From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 18 02:47:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1BC016A474 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 02:46:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) Received: from vonnegut.anholt.net (69-30-77-85.dq1sn.easystreet.com [69.30.77.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6861543D48 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 02:46:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) Received: from vonnegut.anholt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vonnegut.anholt.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5I2jSJY033424; Sat, 17 Jun 2006 19:45:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) Received: (from anholt@localhost) by vonnegut.anholt.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k5I2jRNi033420; Sat, 17 Jun 2006 19:45:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) X-Authentication-Warning: vonnegut.anholt.net: anholt set sender to eric@anholt.net using -f From: Eric Anholt To: Mikhail Teterin In-Reply-To: <200606071336.33440.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> References: <200606071336.33440.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mmlWe2fu0bNrZyQXLixa" Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 19:45:25 -0700 Message-Id: <1150598725.3474.9.camel@vonnegut> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: another Radeon fiasco :-( X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 02:47:00 -0000 --=-mmlWe2fu0bNrZyQXLixa Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 13:36 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > This is on a machine in the office. A dual-core Pentium-4 with two dual-h= eaded=20 > Radeons (a PCIe one and an older PCI one). Identified thus: >=20 > pci0: driver added > found-> vendor=3D0x8086, dev=3D0x27da, revid=3D0x01 > bus=3D0, slot=3D31, func=3D3 > class=3D0c-05-00, hdrtype=3D0x00, mfdev=3D0 > cmdreg=3D0x0101, statreg=3D0x0280, cachelnsz=3D0 (dwords) > lattimer=3D0x00 (0 ns), mingnt=3D0x00 (0 ns), maxlat=3D0x00 (0 ns= ) > intpin=3Db, irq=3D17 > pci0:31:3: reprobing on driver added > pci1: driver added > found-> vendor=3D0x1002, dev=3D0x5b62, revid=3D0x00 > bus=3D1, slot=3D0, func=3D0 > class=3D03-00-00, hdrtype=3D0x00, mfdev=3D1 > cmdreg=3D0x0003, statreg=3D0x0010, cachelnsz=3D16 (dwords) > lattimer=3D0x00 (0 ns), mingnt=3D0x00 (0 ns), maxlat=3D0x00 (0 ns= ) > intpin=3Da, irq=3D16 > powerspec 2 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 > MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit > pci1:0:0: reprobing on driver added > drm0: port 0xdc00-0xdcff mem=20 > 0xe0000000-0xefffffff,0xfe9e0000-0xfe9effff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 > info: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.24.0 20060225 > found-> vendor=3D0x1002, dev=3D0x5b72, revid=3D0x00 > bus=3D1, slot=3D0, func=3D1 > class=3D03-80-00, hdrtype=3D0x00, mfdev=3D0 > cmdreg=3D0x0007, statreg=3D0x0010, cachelnsz=3D16 (dwords) > lattimer=3D0x00 (0 ns), mingnt=3D0x00 (0 ns), maxlat=3D0x00 (0 ns= ) > powerspec 2 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 > pci1:0:1: reprobing on driver added > pci2: driver added > pci3: driver added > pci4: driver added > found-> vendor=3D0x1002, dev=3D0x5159, revid=3D0x00 > bus=3D4, slot=3D0, func=3D0 > class=3D03-00-00, hdrtype=3D0x00, mfdev=3D0 > cmdreg=3D0x0080, statreg=3D0x0290, cachelnsz=3D16 (dwords) > lattimer=3D0x40 (1920 ns), mingnt=3D0x08 (2000 ns), maxlat=3D0x00= (0 ns) > intpin=3Da, irq=3D16 > powerspec 2 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 > pci4:0:0: reprobing on driver added > drm1: port 0xcc00-0xccff mem=20 > 0xf0000000-0xf7ffffff,0xfe5b0000-0xfe5bffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci4 > info: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.24.0 20060225 >=20 > I rebuilt the kernel on May 30th, and the graphics/dri today (should I be= =20 > using some other driver?). When starting Xorg with dri enabled, I get not= hing=20 > but four blank screens (I tried to disable all other modules except glx a= nd=20 > dri -- same results)... >=20 > With dri disabled, all four heads work as expected -- and slow. The Xorg'= s log=20 > files are availale here: >=20 > http://aldan.algebra.com/~mi/mi.Xorg.0.log.dri.txt > http://aldan.algebra.com/~mi/mi.Xorg.0.log.nondri.txt >=20 > The verbose dmesg is at >=20 > http://aldan.algebra.com/~mi/mi.dmesg.verbose.txt >=20 > and the xorg.conf (with dri disabled) -- at: >=20 > http://aldan.algebra.com/~mi/mi.xorg.conf >=20 > Please, advise. Thank you, >=20 > -mi >=20 > P.S. Does anyone even care for such bug reports, or are the radeon proble= ms=20 > too numerous to address withing FreeBSD and we must just wait for better=20 > drivers from maintainers? I suspect you've made a configuration nobody's tested before. As far as I knew, the DRI should have disabled itself due to Xinerama being used in your config. This should be filed upstream. --=20 Eric Anholt anholt@FreeBSD.org eric@anholt.net eric.anholt@intel.com --=-mmlWe2fu0bNrZyQXLixa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBElL5FHUdvYGzw6vcRAslIAJ9TN0UbF8c+qOdUl8+3JL3dqz50nwCfVXpF qq08UB4GZgD7VN+6hvMTXdw= =JqYw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-mmlWe2fu0bNrZyQXLixa-- From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 18 03:48:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05BA16A474 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 03:48:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33D943D45 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 03:48:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id m7so382382nzf for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2006 20:48:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=a1nmTus+mdEDuFLJ7PIr3rPynuc+UqlogEvdV256pk/DW7WJvvJLVYM3ZdQbgk0TOp8RRDHg3ZwJXDiJNGCcv2iQFDWLuqI7gt9aY8mlQcWyNhXnCXgTRgDVGMowaDO5r6lZ453rz2AABugZjKpKHKt23P6Eure7CBTEhzzZjqc= Received: by 10.36.251.45 with SMTP id y45mr5819010nzh; Sat, 17 Jun 2006 20:48:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.182.7 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Jun 2006 20:48:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 22:48:03 -0500 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Mikhail Teterin" In-Reply-To: <200606071336.33440.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200606071336.33440.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: another Radeon fiasco :-( X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 03:48:04 -0000 On 6/7/06, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > This is on a machine in the office. A dual-core Pentium-4 with two dual-headed > Radeons (a PCIe one and an older PCI one). Identified thus: > > > http://aldan.algebra.com/~mi/mi.Xorg.0.log.dri.txt > http://aldan.algebra.com/~mi/mi.Xorg.0.log.nondri.txt > > The verbose dmesg is at > > http://aldan.algebra.com/~mi/mi.dmesg.verbose.txt > > and the xorg.conf (with dri disabled) -- at: > > http://aldan.algebra.com/~mi/mi.xorg.conf > > Please, advise. Thank you, > Yep, this card is to blame --> . I run a triple head ATI setup and I'm in the same boat as you... supposedly this problem is fix in X.org 7.1. -- BSD Podcasts @: http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/ http://freebsdforall.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 18 15:49:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41EA16A474 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 15:49:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7932A43D45 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 15:49:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5IFnkTw055982 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Jun 2006 11:49:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k5IFnhck055981; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 11:49:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin To: Eric Anholt Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 11:49:42 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200606071336.33440.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <1150598725.3474.9.camel@vonnegut> In-Reply-To: <1150598725.3474.9.camel@vonnegut> X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Cc: Mikhail Teterin , x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: another Radeon fiasco :-( X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 15:49:49 -0000 On Saturday 17 June 2006 22:45, Eric Anholt wrote: = I suspect you've made a configuration nobody's tested before. šAs far as = I knew, the DRI should have disabled itself due to Xinerama being used = in your config. šThis should be filed upstream. Strictly speaking, this is not a Xinerama. The four monitors are arranged into have two dual screen displays: :0.0 and :0.1 (each with their pseudo-Xinerama provided by the radeon driver). I was hoping to see DRI working on, at least, one of them... -mi From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 19 01:29:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E493116A47B for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 01:29:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C8943D48 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 01:29:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from pinot.fmjassoc.com (209.218.101.53.bvi2.wizwire.com [209.218.101.53]) by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k5J0TIgF018801 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2006 17:29:19 -0700 From: Frank Jahnke To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 18:18:02 -0700 Message-Id: <1150679882.937.20.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-WizWire-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@sonatabio.com Subject: MergedFB and Matrox X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 01:29:31 -0000 I am looking to get hardware acceleration/OpenGL running on my Matrox G450 that drives dual monitors. The best way for me to do that is in MergedFB mode, as I don't care much for independent X sessions. In the XFree days, that entailed including mga_hal and patching mga_drv to enable pseudo-Xinerama mode (not strictly necessary, but it made life a lot easier). Things have changed with X.org 6.9, where mga_hal no longer worked when I last looked. Since I did not need it for Xinerama, I ignored it until now. Has mga_hal been tended to? Also, has the pseudo-Xinerama patch been included with the mga_drv driver, or is installing that still necessary? Thanks! Frank From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 19 07:20:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3408516A479 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 07:20:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F304743D46 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 07:20:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5J7KOjI048690 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 07:20:24 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k5J7KO4Z048689; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 07:20:24 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 07:20:24 GMT Message-Id: <200606190720.k5J7KO4Z048689@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org From: Boris Popov Cc: Subject: Re: ports/85132: XOrg 6.8.2 won't start on Toshiba Satellite 1800-554 equipped with Trident CyberBlade A1i X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Boris Popov List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 07:20:25 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/85132; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Boris Popov To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: dysoft@kco.com.pl Subject: Re: ports/85132: XOrg 6.8.2 won't start on Toshiba Satellite 1800-554 equipped with Trident CyberBlade A1i Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:19:19 +0600 I can confirm that stock 6.1-release kernel gives the same sympthoms on Toshiba Satellite 1800-700 with similar graphics card and Xorg 6.9.0 server. This is not a problem of Xorg drivers and can be resolved: 1. Disable ACPI (one may try to enable it later). 2. Create GENERIC based custom kernel config file and remove "device eisa" line, remove all other drivers which are not necessary. Enable apm device. Install new kernel and reboot. 3. Edit xorg configuration file: add "Option "NoDDC"" to the corresponding "device" section. Try to start Xes, if computer still hangs (even C-A-D doesn't work) add also "Option "NoPCIBurst"" to the same section (don't remove NoDDC). -- Boris Popov http://rbp.euro.ru From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 19 11:03:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2EE316A6F9 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:03:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCD143D48 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:03:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5JB3KG2064403 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:03:20 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k5JB3J1j064399 for freebsd-x11@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:03:19 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:03:19 GMT Message-Id: <200606191103.k5JB3J1j064399@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:03:21 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2005/10/28] ports/88115 x11 ivview (installed by inventor port) end i s [2005/11/15] ports/89074 x11 Segmentation Violation during "make insta o [2006/01/20] ports/92071 x11 Problem with Xorg and SIS630/730 integrat o [2006/01/22] ports/92137 x11 x11-server/xorg-{server,nestserver,prints a [2006/01/22] ports/92169 x11 Xorg 6.9, Matrox mga, dri broken (MGAGetB o [2006/02/01] ports/92672 x11 X.org 6.9.0 brak down sync mga_hal dirver o [2006/02/09] ports/93071 x11 x11-servers/xorg-server: Resume fails on o [2006/02/24] ports/93777 x11 Starting xorg-server requires reloading s o [2006/05/08] ports/96966 x11 Fatal server error: xf86EnableIO: Failed o [2006/05/10] ports/97084 x11 Xorg 6.9.0 Locks Up Keyboard and Mouse o [2006/05/16] ports/97367 x11 vlc and gmplayer crash with X error 11 problems total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- s [2004/11/09] ports/73743 x11 XOrg/XFree xauth add/startx problem s [2005/08/19] ports/85132 x11 XOrg 6.8.2 won't start on Toshiba Satelli s [2005/10/16] ports/87528 x11 Missing koi8-r encoding for xorg-fonts-en f [2005/11/21] ports/89349 x11 xorg problem: math/gnuplot: BadAtom (inva o [2006/02/21] ports/93667 x11 x11/xorg-libraries: undefined symbol in l o [2006/03/07] ports/94167 x11 [patch] x11/xorg-clients: install xdm/Xst o [2006/03/11] ports/94331 x11 x11/xorg: advocating for DRI support for o [2006/04/27] ports/96436 x11 [patch] x11/xorg-clients: logging on xdm 8 problems total. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 19 13:56:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7186816A494 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:56:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C60543D45 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:56:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id m7so576547nzf for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 06:56:09 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=dTqx4JtnWk8n+iSswPnB2hLMlR5N1mPWVOGV7IOHkQ5835j1PyCkDkcwkj4K8QFb76LVBaRWtCWQipwjgst5MdhHHR9UjdYXVd7grVt6ZCfWCeEE6YHoMYra6qiP4TjyWUw4B+0rDLT8Lp+tMDhV0AauNnw4Jdtq4rri3GvBOis= Received: by 10.36.252.74 with SMTP id z74mr776228nzh; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 06:56:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.182.7 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 06:56:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 08:56:09 -0500 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: What cards are supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:56:10 -0000 I need a list of cards officially supported by X.org and FreeBSD **AND** have working dri/drm bullshit... without proprietary drivers. I'll started the list off: RV100 ATI Cards: Not Supported. R200 ATI Cards: Supported. RV250 ATI Cards: ? RV280 ATI Cards: ? R300 ATI Cards: ? Matrox: ? Nvidia (all): Not Supported? -- BSD Podcasts @: http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/ http://freebsdforall.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 19 22:16:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: x11@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCBD16A47B for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 22:16:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indigo23@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDD843D55 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 22:16:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from indigo23@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so1156269nfe for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:16:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=EoRTkP+uuXEwhoGtBmkmUhZhxl8R5qkFY+Z3zenZ7XM9oQSG0MoCcnWi8ftCK3zbRVEitvOSod5pBcAPnIlQQNFAKsSxC86s25y/JlFoIVtCXQyOrXqMfCUO6WD/RKh72CVBkKHXoZBN7GiJYOYBJi6EkbG1mXCXdjK2xOWeABk= Received: by 10.49.31.1 with SMTP id i1mr4994895nfj; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:16:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.243.2 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:16:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6f50eac40606191516j2a2d8714j1d5887538a60d881@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:16:56 -0400 From: "Indigo 23" To: anholt@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Curious about X11R7.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 22:16:59 -0000 I am just wondering if you guys are working on updating the FreeBSD port of x11/xorg to the latest release, which seems to be 7.1. I ask this because I am hoping that XGL/compiz support comes with this update. If you are working on updating it, could you please provide a rough estimation/timeline of when you think it will be ready? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 20 08:34:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: x11@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E64E16A47A; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:34:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CED843D62; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:34:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id B0A742EBB; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 03:34:44 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 03:34:44 -0500 To: Indigo 23 Message-ID: <20060620083444.GD9929@soaustin.net> References: <6f50eac40606191516j2a2d8714j1d5887538a60d881@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6f50eac40606191516j2a2d8714j1d5887538a60d881@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: anholt@FreeBSD.org, x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Curious about X11R7.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:34:46 -0000 It's coming. anholt just got back from a long vacation, and also portmgr is attempting to catch up on a backlog of other things that need regression testing on the build cluster as well. This change is significant enough that it will probably be its own, single, regression test. These take 4-5 days apiece (if there are no problems found, of course). mcl From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 21 02:49:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EAF916A481; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 02:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A59243D45; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 02:49:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (linimon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5L2nlW4019144; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 02:49:47 GMT (envelope-from linimon@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k5L2nlp0019140; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 02:49:47 GMT (envelope-from linimon) Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 02:49:47 GMT From: Mark Linimon Message-Id: <200606210249.k5L2nlp0019140@freefall.freebsd.org> To: linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/99206: x11-servers/XFree86-4-Server broken (make patch fails) X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 02:49:47 -0000 Old Synopsis: port XFree86-4-Server broken (make patch fails) New Synopsis: x11-servers/XFree86-4-Server broken (make patch fails) Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-x11 Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jun 21 02:48:41 UTC 2006 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer(s). http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=99206 From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 21 04:27:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41DCB16A494 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 04:27:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (mail-in-09.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E382643D49 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 04:27:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-11-z2.arcor-so.net (mail-in-11-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.28]) by mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE72D333C55; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 06:27:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (mail-in-09.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.49]) by mail-in-11-z2.arcor-so.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991FF3CE785; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 06:27:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (dslb-084-061-141-203.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.61.141.203]) by mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62014333C8B; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 06:27:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kiste.my.domain (root@kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k5L4RbVt080293 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Jun 2006 06:27:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from kiste.my.domain (lofi@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kiste.my.domain (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5L4Rbjg082383; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 06:27:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by kiste.my.domain (8.13.6/8.13.4/Submit) id k5L4Ral6082382; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 06:27:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kiste.my.domain: lofi set sender to lofi@freebsd.org using -f From: Michael Nottebrock To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 06:27:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: In-Reply-To: X-Face: =Ym$`&q\+S2X$4`X%x%6"L4>Y,$]<":'L%c9"#7#`2tb&E&wsN31on!N\)3BD[g<=?utf-8?q?=2EjnfV=5B=0A=093=23?=>XchLK,o; >bD>c:]^; :>0>vyZ.X[,63GW`&M>}nYnr]-Fp``,[[@lJ!QL|sfW!s)=?utf-8?q?A2!*=0A=09vNkB/=7CL-?=>&QdSbQg X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: Subject: Re: What cards are supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 04:27:52 -0000 --nextPart6973513.tAjC8kbNLJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday, 19. June 2006 15:56, Nikolas Britton wrote: > I need a list of cards officially supported by X.org and FreeBSD > **AND** have working dri/drm bullshit... without proprietary drivers. 'Officially'? > I'll started the list off: > > RV100 ATI Cards: Not Supported. I've had an R100-based AGP card (Radeon DDR 32, later known as Radeon 7200)= =20 working with DRI/DRM a good long while ago. My current system does not have= =20 an AGP slot anymore however. I ran this card on a mainboard with an Intel=20 ICH2 AGPset. Not quite the same as an R*V*100-based card, but close. :) > RV280 ATI Cards: ? That was my last AGP card before I switched mainboards, a Radeon 9200 (no S= E).=20 That one also had working DRI/DRM on an ICH2 mainboard. Cheers, =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart6973513.tAjC8kbNLJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQBEmMq4Xhc68WspdLARAhnGAJkBlPhL/7GQ5LHDKG52K8yjCHbs/wCXUAJf OO5wuMZoekDbdRHyowjs4Q== =M0oT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6973513.tAjC8kbNLJ-- From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 21 05:09:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B346216A474 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 05:09:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62EE843D46 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 05:09:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5L59PdW029971 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:09:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.6/8.13.1/Submit) id k5L59PRA029970 for freebsd-x11@freebsd.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:09:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:09:25 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060621050925.GA29935@dragon.NUXI.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: 6.9.0, the wheel scroll behaves diff? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@NUXI.com List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 05:09:26 -0000 On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 01:43:49PM -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:22:38 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > >Looks like it's xorg's new bug. I found someone has a same issue that is > >using Debian in the freedesktop bugzilla. I have added my details over > >there. > > > >https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5483 > > > >I have added a comment of workaround for avoid the scroll up + right > >click in bugzilla too. > > I have found a solution, just backout > xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/input/mouse/mouse.c to rev 1.18. See more > details in the same place above url. > > This http://tinyurl.com/comzf is causing problem for IntelliMouse Optical, > but I don't know about other mouses. Was this ever fixed in the FreeBSD port? I recently upgraded two different machine to 6.9.0_3 and both have lost their mouse wheel. :-( -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 21 06:55:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2BB16A59C for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 06:55:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) Received: from leguin.anholt.net (69-30-77-85.dq1sn.easystreet.com [69.30.77.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12D943D46 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 06:55:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) Received: from leguin.anholt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leguin.anholt.net (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k5L6thUd035341; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 23:55:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) Received: (from anholt@localhost) by leguin.anholt.net (8.13.6/8.13.1/Submit) id k5L6tg8Z035340; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 23:55:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) X-Authentication-Warning: leguin.anholt.net: anholt set sender to eric@anholt.net using -f From: Eric Anholt To: Nikolas Britton In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-yuUqBNrV6fkq5Aabdjp2" Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 23:55:42 -0700 Message-Id: <1150872942.39506.1.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What cards are supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 06:55:46 -0000 --=-yuUqBNrV6fkq5Aabdjp2 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 08:56 -0500, Nikolas Britton wrote: > I need a list of cards officially supported by X.org and FreeBSD > **AND** have working dri/drm bullshit... without proprietary drivers. >=20 > I'll started the list off: >=20 > RV100 ATI Cards: Not Supported. Supported > R200 ATI Cards: Supported. Supported > RV250 ATI Cards: ? Supported > RV280 ATI Cards: ? Supported > R300 ATI Cards: ? Supported > Matrox: ? Supported (G200-G550) > Nvidia (all): Not Supported? Not supported. --=20 Eric Anholt anholt@FreeBSD.org eric@anholt.net eric.anholt@intel.com --=-yuUqBNrV6fkq5Aabdjp2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEmO1uHUdvYGzw6vcRAj9aAJ4lJGQcxdaFgt/SW9Xwh8VVMoZO/gCfdPSZ cn78D42qtI+7cwtFG8hPXeY= =io+m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-yuUqBNrV6fkq5Aabdjp2-- From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 21 10:05:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E6816A47F for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:05:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fenner+portsurvey@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2174243D7F for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:04:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fenner+portsurvey@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (fenner@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5LA4qQF050927 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:04:52 GMT (envelope-from fenner+portsurvey@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k5LA4q8j050926; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:04:52 GMT (envelope-from fenner+portsurvey) Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:04:52 GMT Message-Id: <200606211004.k5LA4q8j050926@freefall.freebsd.org> From: fenner@freebsd.org (Bill "distfiles" Fenner) To: x11@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: FreeBSD ports: 1 unfetchable distfile: x11-servers/xorg-server-snap X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ports@freebsd.org List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:05:05 -0000 Dear x11@freebsd.org, You are listed as the FreeBSD port maintainer for 1 port whose distfiles are not fetchable from their MASTER_SITES. Could you please visit http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/x11@freebsd.org.html and correct the problems listed there? The individual port with a problem is x11-servers/xorg-server-snap. If you have already corrected the problems and submitted a PR, please accept my thanks and apologies for the delay in getting the fixes into the tree. This reminder is created automatically and does not (yet) have a way to know if a PR fixing the problem has been submitted. Please do *NOT* send your response to me directly; I do not necessarily have time to commit your fix; please instead submit a PR via 'send-pr' so it doesn't get lost. Problems are usually of two types: 1. The software package has been upgraded and the version in the port has been removed. The best solution to this problem is to upgrade the port to the most current version of the software package. If you are a FreeBSD committer, then you can just upgrade the port directly. If not, you should create the updated port on your own machine, test it (and maybe even run "portlint" on it), and then use "send-pr" to submit a "diff -uNr old-port updated-port". If you added or deleted any files, please make an explicit note of it. 2. The mirror site being used no longer contains the software package in question, or no longer exists. Solutions include: a) If there are other mirror sites, just remove the bad site from the list. (Make sure that what appears to be a bad site isn't actually a problem of type 1, upgrade) b) If the README or other support files in the software documentation mention where to get the software package, use one of those sites. c) Use a search engine to find another place to get the original DISTFILES. Make sure that you don't pick a FreeBSD distfiles mirror -- if you can't find any other places where the file exists, it can be a LOCAL_PORT or you can simply comment out the MASTER_SITES= line, with a comment explaining why. Once you have a solution, use "send-pr" to submit a "diff -u" of the Makefile. Note that this isn't an urgent issue, as people who try to build the port now will just fall back to the FreeBSD distfiles mirror. Please just put it on your list to do and get to it when you have time. These messages will continue to arrive twice a month until the fix is committed, as a reminder. Thanks, Bill "distfiles" Fenner. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 21 21:41:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F2216A479 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:41:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from james@wgold.demon.co.uk) Received: from anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.92]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B585A43D46 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:41:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james@wgold.demon.co.uk) Received: from wgold.demon.co.uk ([158.152.96.124] helo=thor) by anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1FtAS5-00016h-Du for freebsd-x11@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:41:33 +0000 Received: from 127.0.0.1 by thor ([127.0.0.1] running VPOP3) with SMTP for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:42:09 +0100 From: "James Mansion" To: Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:42:07 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-Server: VPOP3 V1.5.0k - Registered Subject: Via PD6000 motherboard integrated UniChrome adapter X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:41:35 -0000 I'm having trouble configuring FreeBSD 6.1 or PC-BSD 1.1 on my Via system. When I try to use the X configuratio tool, I don't see the Chrome driver listed or anything for 'Via'. Modern (and some fairly old) Linux systems seem happy to detect and use the UniChrome adapter though. I just slammed Suse 10.1 onto the box, and it claims to have found Via Technologies CLE266. I thought the X server had 'caught up'? James From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 17:17:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2D716A4A7 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:17:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D32943DCA for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:17:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5NHHM1S077695 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:17:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k5NHHMT8077694 for x11@freebsd.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:17:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin To: x11@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:17:21 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Cc: Subject: gears vs. glxgears; i915 for Linux binaries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:17:47 -0000 First of all, allow me to thank you for the working DRI on my laptop with i915 chipset. Although none of my Radeon desktops work yet, this is very welcome progress. After installing the linux_dri port, I wanted to compare the simple (glx)gears results between the Linux and the native binaries. The /compat/linux/usr/X11R6/bin/gears appears to be the same beast, as the ${X11BASE]/bin/glxgears installed by the native Xorg port. Running the Linux gears seemed VERY fast -- they were spinning like crazy but the program reports just 1800 frames per 5 seconds -- around 380 FPS (all for the default small window). Running the native glxgears appeared much slower, but the reported stats were ~2.5 times higher -- around 950 FPS. Now, the reported speed difference is, likely, due to the fact, that the linux_dri does not (yet?) install the i915_dri.so, so no DRI is (yet?) possible for Linux programs on my laptop. But why does it *appear* to be faster? Thanks! -mi From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 17:28:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62ABC16A47C for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:28:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45F643D45 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:28:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from admin.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FtpS1-000CLH-56; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:28:13 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FtpT7-000CP2-07; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:29:21 +0400 To: Mikhail Teterin References: <200606231317.21964@aldan> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:29:20 +0400 In-Reply-To: <200606231317.21964@aldan> (Mikhail Teterin's message of "Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:17:21 -0400") Message-ID: <83238575@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gears vs. glxgears; i915 for Linux binaries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:28:17 -0000 On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:17:21 -0400 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > First of all, allow me to thank you for the working DRI on my laptop with i915 > chipset. Although none of my Radeon desktops work yet, this is very welcome > progress. > After installing the linux_dri port, I wanted to compare the simple (glx)gears > results between the Linux and the native binaries. > The /compat/linux/usr/X11R6/bin/gears appears to be the same beast, as the > ${X11BASE]/bin/glxgears installed by the native Xorg port. > Running the Linux gears seemed VERY fast -- they were spinning like crazy but > the program reports just 1800 frames per 5 seconds -- around 380 FPS (all for > the default small window). > Running the native glxgears appeared much slower, but the reported stats were > ~2.5 times higher -- around 950 FPS. > Now, the reported speed difference is, likely, due to the fact, that the > linux_dri does not (yet?) install the i915_dri.so, so no DRI is (yet?) > possible for Linux programs on my laptop. But why does it *appear* to be > faster? It's an optical effect. Haven't you ever see a wheel (a car or bicycle) which *seems* to spin the wrong direction? It's the same here. ;-) WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 17:29:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA2416A561 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:29:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) Received: from leguin.anholt.net (69-30-77-85.dq1sn.easystreet.com [69.30.77.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF64C43D46 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:29:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) Received: from leguin.anholt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leguin.anholt.net (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k5NHSf8v018949; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:28:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) Received: (from anholt@localhost) by leguin.anholt.net (8.13.6/8.13.1/Submit) id k5NHSeO1018948; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:28:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) X-Authentication-Warning: leguin.anholt.net: anholt set sender to eric@anholt.net using -f From: Eric Anholt To: Mikhail Teterin In-Reply-To: <200606231317.21964@aldan> References: <200606231317.21964@aldan> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-78OGp5RJoTnVaSvFL9kw" Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:28:39 -0700 Message-Id: <1151083719.18920.5.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gears vs. glxgears; i915 for Linux binaries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:29:10 -0000 --=-78OGp5RJoTnVaSvFL9kw Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 13:17 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > First of all, allow me to thank you for the working DRI on my laptop with= i915=20 > chipset. Although none of my Radeon desktops work yet, this is very welco= me=20 > progress. >=20 > After installing the linux_dri port, I wanted to compare the simple (glx)= gears=20 > results between the Linux and the native binaries. >=20 > The /compat/linux/usr/X11R6/bin/gears appears to be the same beast, as th= e=20 > ${X11BASE]/bin/glxgears installed by the native Xorg port. >=20 > Running the Linux gears seemed VERY fast -- they were spinning like crazy= but=20 > the program reports just 1800 frames per 5 seconds -- around 380 FPS (all= for=20 > the default small window). >=20 > Running the native glxgears appeared much slower, but the reported stats = were=20 > ~2.5 times higher -- around 950 FPS. >=20 > Now, the reported speed difference is, likely, due to the fact, that the=20 > linux_dri does not (yet?) install the i915_dri.so, so no DRI is (yet?)=20 > possible for Linux programs on my laptop. But why does it *appear* to be=20 > faster? The gears move at a constant rate of change per frame. You're blitting frames to the screen faster than the screen outputs them. So, you get some subset of the frames gears drew, which don't necessarily give you the animation you expect. Sometimes the gears will even appear to go backwards (just like hubcaps on a car in movies will sometimes). I think glxgears is dumb for not syncing to vblank, and I run most of my apps with syncing to vblank on. You can use driconf to set this. You're getting software rendering with linux_dri. LIBGL_DEBUG=3Dverbose is the way to debug DRI issues, but I can shortcut here and yes, the absence of i915_dri.so is the problem. We need to get linux_dri updated to a set of recent Mesa binaries. I wonder what our current linux_base's package of dri modules looks like? --=20 Eric Anholt anholt@FreeBSD.org eric@anholt.net eric.anholt@intel.com --=-78OGp5RJoTnVaSvFL9kw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEnCTHHUdvYGzw6vcRApP+AJ4mS50CwR5bsurZQNf8DS4PZ/c73ACfS6me RN9GT9VPE4gMiMsQ3e0jmgQ= =BiU+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-78OGp5RJoTnVaSvFL9kw-- From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 18:06:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A33D516A4C9 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:06:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1B143D4C for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:06:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from srv.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1]) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ftq3K-000CPa-Ob; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:06:46 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ftq4Q-000CR8-Gc; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:07:54 +0400 To: Eric Anholt References: <200606231317.21964@aldan> <1151083719.18920.5.camel@leguin> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:07:54 +0400 In-Reply-To: <1151083719.18920.5.camel@leguin> (Eric Anholt's message of "Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:28:39 -0700") Message-ID: <95716261@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: x11@freebsd.org, Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: gears vs. glxgears; i915 for Linux binaries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:06:56 -0000 On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:28:39 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote: > You're getting software rendering with linux_dri. LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose > is the way to debug DRI issues, but I can shortcut here and yes, the > absence of i915_dri.so is the problem. We need to get linux_dri updated > to a set of recent Mesa binaries. I wonder what our current There are some efforts. :-) But no "when" so far. > linux_base's package of dri modules looks like? Linux_base doesn't have any X-related stuff. Nore does current linux X-port (linux-xorg-libs). We do have only graphics/linux_dri based on XFree86-4.4.0. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 18:10:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3732516A57F; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:10:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928A843D4C; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:10:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5NIAVZc078189 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:10:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k5NIAUhK078188; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:10:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin To: Eric Anholt , emulation@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:10:30 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200606231317.21964@aldan> <1151083719.18920.5.camel@leguin> In-Reply-To: <1151083719.18920.5.camel@leguin> X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gears vs. glxgears; i915 for Linux binaries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:10:34 -0000 On Friday 23 June 2006 13:28, Eric Anholt wrote: = You're getting software rendering with linux_dri. šLIBGL_DEBUG=verbose = is the way to debug DRI issues, but I can shortcut here and yes, the = absence of i915_dri.so is the problem. Yes, setting LIBGL_DEBUG to "yes" is how I figured, the i915_dri.so is missing. = We need to get linux_dri updated to a set of recent Mesa binaries. šI wonder = what our current linux_base's package of dri modules looks like? That's the question to the folks at emulation@. CC-ed... -mi From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 18:19:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C09416A494; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:19:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990C143D5A; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:19:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from admin.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FtqFj-000CRU-HI; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:19:35 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FtqGp-000CRa-8O; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:20:43 +0400 To: Mikhail Teterin References: <200606231317.21964@aldan> <1151083719.18920.5.camel@leguin> <200606231410.30740@aldan> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:20:43 +0400 In-Reply-To: <200606231410.30740@aldan> (Mikhail Teterin's message of "Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:10:30 -0400") Message-ID: <47559956@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, Eric Anholt , x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gears vs. glxgears; i915 for Linux binaries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:19:44 -0000 On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:10:30 -0400 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > On Friday 23 June 2006 13:28, Eric Anholt wrote: > = You're getting software rendering with linux_dri. šLIBGL_DEBUG=verbose > = is the way to debug DRI issues, but I can shortcut here and yes, the > = absence of i915_dri.so is the problem. > Yes, setting LIBGL_DEBUG to "yes" is how I figured, the i915_dri.so is > missing. > = We need to get linux_dri updated to a set of recent Mesa binaries. šI wonder > = what our current linux_base's package of dri modules looks like? > That's the question to the folks at emulation@. CC-ed... I've already asked to x11@... WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 18:23:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2151D16A4A6; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:23:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B045E43D53; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:23:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from stat.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FtqJ1-000CSZ-GT; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:22:59 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FtqK7-000CRq-7J; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:24:07 +0400 To: Mikhail Teterin References: <200606231317.21964@aldan> <1151083719.18920.5.camel@leguin> <200606231410.30740@aldan> <47559956@srv.sem.ipt.ru> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:24:07 +0400 In-Reply-To: <47559956@srv.sem.ipt.ru> (Boris Samorodov's message of "Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:20:43 +0400") Message-ID: <81479752@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, Eric Anholt , x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gears vs. glxgears; i915 for Linux binaries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:23:22 -0000 On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:20:43 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:10:30 -0400 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > On Friday 23 June 2006 13:28, Eric Anholt wrote: > > = You're getting software rendering with linux_dri. šLIBGL_DEBUG=verbose > > = is the way to debug DRI issues, but I can shortcut here and yes, the > > = absence of i915_dri.so is the problem. > > Yes, setting LIBGL_DEBUG to "yes" is how I figured, the i915_dri.so is > > missing. > > = We need to get linux_dri updated to a set of recent Mesa binaries. šI wonder > > = what our current linux_base's package of dri modules looks like? > > That's the question to the folks at emulation@. CC-ed... > I've already asked to x11@... Doh! It should be "I've already answered to x11@..." Sorry. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 19:36:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8091B16A5DE for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:36:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED1143D58 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:36:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5NJanqG078576 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:36:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k5NJani3078575; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:36:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin To: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:36:48 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200606231317.21964@aldan> <1151083719.18920.5.camel@leguin> <95716261@srv.sem.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <95716261@srv.sem.ipt.ru> X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Cc: Eric Anholt , x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gears vs. glxgears; i915 for Linux binaries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:36:58 -0000 On Friday 23 June 2006 14:07, Boris Samorodov wrote: = Linux_base doesn't have any X-related stuff. Nore does current linux = X-port (linux-xorg-libs). We do have only graphics/linux_dri based on = XFree86-4.4.0. I replaced the dri/ subdirectory installed by the linux_dri port with that from inside the Fedora Core 4 xorg-x11-6.8.2-37.FC4.49.2.1.i386.rpm . Unfortunately, that is NOT enough. gears and glxinfo both write complain, that ``InitDriver failed'' (in intel_screen.c line 114). What else should I fetch? Thanks! -mi From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 19:44:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C570D16A4A6; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:44:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) Received: from vonnegut.anholt.net (69-30-77-85.dq1sn.easystreet.com [69.30.77.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3088A43D49; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:44:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) Received: from vonnegut.anholt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vonnegut.anholt.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5NJhCuF076592; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:43:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) Received: (from anholt@localhost) by vonnegut.anholt.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k5NJhBCa076591; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:43:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eric@anholt.net) X-Authentication-Warning: vonnegut.anholt.net: anholt set sender to eric@anholt.net using -f From: Eric Anholt To: Boris Samorodov In-Reply-To: <95716261@srv.sem.ipt.ru> References: <200606231317.21964@aldan> <1151083719.18920.5.camel@leguin> <95716261@srv.sem.ipt.ru> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-xfLk9WUuMYbqK+17pSF4" Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:42:53 -0700 Message-Id: <1151091773.7299.2.camel@vonnegut> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org, Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: gears vs. glxgears; i915 for Linux binaries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:44:45 -0000 --=-xfLk9WUuMYbqK+17pSF4 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 22:07 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:28:39 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote: >=20 > > You're getting software rendering with linux_dri. LIBGL_DEBUG=3Dverbos= e > > is the way to debug DRI issues, but I can shortcut here and yes, the > > absence of i915_dri.so is the problem. We need to get linux_dri update= d > > to a set of recent Mesa binaries. I wonder what our current >=20 > There are some efforts. :-) But no "when" so far. >=20 > > linux_base's package of dri modules looks like? >=20 > Linux_base doesn't have any X-related stuff. Nore does current linux > X-port (linux-xorg-libs). We do have only graphics/linux_dri based on > XFree86-4.4.0. OK, I checked what FC4 has, and their big xorg RPM is 6.8.2 and contains DRI drivers. However, I don't think we want to use FC4's, not just because of the size of the RPM, but also because the drivers are likely to be too stale. The DRI driver <-> DDX interface breaks backwards compat much more often than the DRI <-> DRM interface (which in theory never breaks). So, we really want some fresh Mesa 6.4.2+ DRI drivers, which we can't get from FC4. So, that means someone needs to get a linux box with suitable glibc again and roll their own like I used to, probably. Or maybe steal binaries from some other distro. Suggestions? --=20 Eric Anholt anholt@FreeBSD.org eric@anholt.net eric.anholt@intel.com --=-xfLk9WUuMYbqK+17pSF4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEnEQ9HUdvYGzw6vcRAvIyAJ9cis1UUtqMpHwHzhMx+vPiACYrrgCdFTkx cQwycxdw5AFv+luTpU6TZh4= =cdBK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xfLk9WUuMYbqK+17pSF4-- From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 24 19:17:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688CB16A4A9; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 19:17:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D276C43D60; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 19:17:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from doc.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FuDdQ-000FNx-JU; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 23:17:36 +0400 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FuDeS-000EFp-R9; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 23:18:40 +0400 To: Eric Anholt References: <200606231317.21964@aldan> <1151083719.18920.5.camel@leguin> <95716261@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <1151091773.7299.2.camel@vonnegut> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 23:18:40 +0400 In-Reply-To: <1151091773.7299.2.camel@vonnegut> (Eric Anholt's message of "Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:42:53 -0700") Message-ID: <15386511@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org, Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: gears vs. glxgears; i915 for Linux binaries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 19:17:45 -0000 On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:42:53 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote: > On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 22:07 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:28:39 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote: > > > > > You're getting software rendering with linux_dri. LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose > > > is the way to debug DRI issues, but I can shortcut here and yes, the > > > absence of i915_dri.so is the problem. We need to get linux_dri updated > > > to a set of recent Mesa binaries. I wonder what our current > > > > There are some efforts. :-) But no "when" so far. > > > > > linux_base's package of dri modules looks like? > > > > Linux_base doesn't have any X-related stuff. Nore does current linux > > X-port (linux-xorg-libs). We do have only graphics/linux_dri based on > > XFree86-4.4.0. > OK, I checked what FC4 has, and their big xorg RPM is 6.8.2 and contains > DRI drivers. However, I don't think we want to use FC4's, not just > because of the size of the RPM, but also because the drivers are likely > to be too stale. The DRI driver <-> DDX interface breaks backwards > compat much more often than the DRI <-> DRM interface (which in theory > never breaks). So, we really want some fresh Mesa 6.4.2+ DRI drivers, > which we can't get from FC4. > So, that means someone needs to get a linux box with suitable glibc > again and roll their own like I used to, probably. Or maybe steal > binaries from some other distro. Suggestions? The only one candidate I've found so far is Mesa-6.4.2-19.i586.rpm from OpenSuSE: ftp://ftp.chg.ru/.1/Linux/opensuse/distribution/SL-10.1/inst-source/suse/i586/Mesa-6.4.2-19.i586.rpm I'll try to test it soon. Anybody willing may beat me at testing. ;-) WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider