From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 22 05:42:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68CB16A402 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 05:42:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kobus@cits.com.na) Received: from mx01.africaonline.com.na (smtp.africaonline.com.na [196.44.140.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22DE413C459 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 05:42:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kobus@cits.com.na) Received: from [196.44.146.194] (port=56478 helo=custompc1) by mx01.africaonline.com.na with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1H8rX2-0006bI-FN for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 05:15:48 +0000 Message-ID: <00fe01c73de5$86be6be0$0b64400a@custompc1> From: "Kobus de Wit" To: Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 07:24:01 +0200 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original Sender: kobus@africaonline.com.na Subject: ALTERNATIVE TO USE OF IP-ADDRESS ALIASES X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kobus de Wit List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 05:42:48 -0000 Hi All, It is my understanding that there is a better way for a server to listen for traffic destined for a specific IP address than to use the ip address alias function. Will somebody be so kind and point me in the right direction (i.e. location of file(s) to edit). Regards Kobus From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 22 09:21:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91F916A401 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phi@evilphi.com) Received: from mail.twinthornes.com (mail.twinthornes.com [65.75.198.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B41D13C455 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phi@evilphi.com) Received: from [10.9.70.4] (c-24-20-142-99.hsd1.or.comcast.net [24.20.142.99]) by mail.twinthornes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B1241; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:52:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45B47B4C.80004@evilphi.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:52:28 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kobus de Wit References: <00fe01c73de5$86be6be0$0b64400a@custompc1> In-Reply-To: <00fe01c73de5$86be6be0$0b64400a@custompc1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ALTERNATIVE TO USE OF IP-ADDRESS ALIASES X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:21:00 -0000 Kobus de Wit wrote: > It is my understanding that there is a better way for a server to > listen for traffic destined for a specific IP address than to use the ip > address alias function. Where did you hear/read this? -- Darren Pilgrim From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 23 12:07:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E2016A401 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:07:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kobus@cits.com.na) Received: from mx01.africaonline.com.na (smtp.africaonline.com.na [196.44.140.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31C413C44B for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:07:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kobus@cits.com.na) Received: from [196.44.146.194] (port=60412 helo=custompc1) by mx01.africaonline.com.na with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1H9KQn-0000vk-3k; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:07:18 +0000 Message-ID: <000e01c73ee8$2e988230$0b64400a@custompc1> From: "Kobus de Wit" To: "Darren Pilgrim" References: <00fe01c73de5$86be6be0$0b64400a@custompc1> <45B47B4C.80004@evilphi.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:15:33 +0200 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response Sender: kobus@africaonline.com.na Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ALTERNATIVE TO USE OF IP-ADDRESS ALIASES X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kobus de Wit List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:07:36 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Darren Pilgrim" To: "Kobus de Wit" Cc: Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 10:52 AM Subject: Re: ALTERNATIVE TO USE OF IP-ADDRESS ALIASES > Kobus de Wit wrote: >> It is my understanding that there is a better way for a server to >> listen for traffic destined for a specific IP address than to use the >> ip address alias function. > > Where did you hear/read this? > > -- > Darren Pilgrim > It was posted to this list during, if I remember correctly, May/June last year (2006). The idea is to forward traffic to a mail server that resides behind the firewall. Kobus _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 23 15:39:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9162316A400; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:39:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rapopp@eastcentral.edu) Received: from ecmail.eastcentral.edu (ecmail.eastcentral.edu [198.209.216.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F74413C461; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:39:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rapopp@eastcentral.edu) Received: from barbados.eastcentral.edu ([10.15.0.132]) by ecmail.eastcentral.edu (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l0NFOkMd027658; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:24:46 -0600 From: "Reuben A. Popp" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:24:59 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1551696.7E2Cj8MWU0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701230925.11930.rapopp@eastcentral.edu> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Best HBA cards to get? X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rapopp@eastcentral.edu List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:39:38 -0000 --nextPart1551696.7E2Cj8MWU0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Morning everyone :) I was curious if anyone could reccomend the best supported/stable HBA cards= =20 available. I've poked around a bit and found that there is support for the= =20 Qlogic cards using isp(4), but that dosen't seem to cover most (if not all)= =20 of their newer cards. Anyone have a suggestion please? Thanks in advance=20 Reuben A. Popp =2D-=20 Reuben A. Popp Systems Administrator Information Technology Department East Central College 1+ 636 583 5195 x2480 --nextPart1551696.7E2Cj8MWU0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFtijXf+ihZq7YgSMRAtJtAJ9n3bH1iAdKmHKgXnym+DzInbsDJACeMzGD uabNyGmhmANdQutVDvZ2O1k= =s4HM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1551696.7E2Cj8MWU0-- From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 23 18:51:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21EA16A403 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:51:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phi@evilphi.com) Received: from mail.twinthornes.com (mail.twinthornes.com [65.75.198.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D309D13C4BC for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:51:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phi@evilphi.com) Received: from [10.9.70.4] (c-24-20-142-99.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [24.20.142.99]) by mail.twinthornes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3068573; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:51:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45B65946.9060804@evilphi.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:51:50 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kobus de Wit References: <00fe01c73de5$86be6be0$0b64400a@custompc1> <45B47B4C.80004@evilphi.com> <000e01c73ee8$2e988230$0b64400a@custompc1> In-Reply-To: <000e01c73ee8$2e988230$0b64400a@custompc1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ALTERNATIVE TO USE OF IP-ADDRESS ALIASES X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:51:58 -0000 Kobus de Wit wrote: >> Kobus de Wit wrote: >>> It is my understanding that there is a better way for a server to >>> listen for traffic destined for a specific IP address than to use the >>> ip address alias function. >> Where did you hear/read this? > > It was posted to this list during, if I remember correctly, May/June > last year (2006). The idea is to forward traffic to a mail server that > resides behind the firewall. I'm not going to do your searching for you. Quote the message or give me a URL for it in an archive and I'll have a look. -- Darren Pilgrim From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 23 22:10:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9D516A401; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:10:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jgrosch@mooseriver.com) Received: from gdead.mooseriver.com (gdead.mooseriver.com [205.166.121.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7852813C4C9; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:10:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jgrosch@mooseriver.com) Received: by gdead.mooseriver.com (Postfix, from userid 2010) id 45B873C9EEC; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:46:22 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on gdead.mooseriver.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=no version=3.1.7 Received: from mooseriver.com (adsl-75-61-201-134.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [75.61.201.134]) by gdead.mooseriver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4223C9EE8; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:46:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by mooseriver.com (Postfix, from userid 200) id 7D06F2E5C10; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:46:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:46:19 -0800 From: Josef Grosch To: "Reuben A. Popp" Message-ID: <20070123214619.GA71508@mooseriver.com> References: <200701230925.11930.rapopp@eastcentral.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200701230925.11930.rapopp@eastcentral.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Organization: Moose River, LLC Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best HBA cards to get? X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jgrosch@MooseRiver.com List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:10:10 -0000 --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:24:59AM -0600, Reuben A. Popp wrote: > Morning everyone :) >=20 > I was curious if anyone could reccomend the best supported/stable HBA car= ds=20 > available. I've poked around a bit and found that there is support for t= he=20 > Qlogic cards using isp(4), but that dosen't seem to cover most (if not al= l)=20 > of their newer cards. Anyone have a suggestion please? >=20 > Thanks in advance=20 > Reuben A. Popp We have had a lot of luck with the Qlogic HBA cards. We tried the LSI but we could not get it to work correctly. Stick with the Qlogic. Josef --=20 Josef Grosch | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD 6.2 jgrosch@MooseRiver.com | Micro$oft free world | Berkeley, Ca. --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFFtoIqy8prLS1GYSERAgTHAKDjPvuc0h/hxEzNOPCCpFwo4OeD5wCgyL4w L1EWUFfyazDeNkUpCunhimE= =d2vB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+-- From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 24 01:25:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A858916A400 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:25:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CD5B13C468 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:25:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 14907 invoked by uid 399); 24 Jan 2007 01:25:09 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.5?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Jan 2007 01:25:09 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <45B6B572.9090901@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:25:06 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (Windows/20070116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kobus de Wit References: <00fe01c73de5$86be6be0$0b64400a@custompc1> <45B47B4C.80004@evilphi.com> <000e01c73ee8$2e988230$0b64400a@custompc1> In-Reply-To: <000e01c73ee8$2e988230$0b64400a@custompc1> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Darren Pilgrim , freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ALTERNATIVE TO USE OF IP-ADDRESS ALIASES X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:25:10 -0000 I think that rather than trying to parse how you think you should solve your problem, we'd be better off if you described what it is that you want to accomplish. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 25 12:55:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A5216A406 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:55:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from NotesGW3/Washington_University@msnotes.wustl.edu) Received: from notes.wustl.edu (notes.wustl.edu [128.252.17.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BE113C44B for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:55:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from NotesGW3/Washington_University@msnotes.wustl.edu) To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: NotesGW3/Washington_University@msnotes.wustl.edu X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 06:39:39 -0600 Message-ID: X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Notes/Washington University at 01/25/2007 06:55:02 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: This message failed an Anti-Virus or File Filter Scan prior to delivery. Please contact your system administrator. X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:55:02 -0000 -----------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- Please do not reply to this message as it was sent from an unattended mailbox. -----------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- If you received this failure message, but didn't send an email, you probably do not have a computer virus, and this message can be deleted.= Many viruses have the ability to forge the sender's name. This can mak= e a message appear to come from you, when it actually did not. If you did send this message, please update your virus scanning softwar= e and check your file attachments before attempting re-delivery. Specific file attachments are not permitted, including .PIF, .SCR, .CMD= , .VBS, and .COM files. If you believe you have received this notification in error, please con= tact your system administrator The scanned document was QUARANTINED. Violation Information: The attachment document1.pif contained the risk W32.Sality.U and was quarantined on server NotesGW3/Washington University. No attempt was m= ade to repair. The filename extension of attachment document1.pif violated the content= filtering rule PIF.= From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 26 09:01:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ECFE16A401 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:01:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "") Received: from mail9.cybercon.com (mail9.cybercon.com [66.165.104.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8EAD13C484 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:01:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "") Received: (qmail 29836 invoked by uid 2458); 26 Jan 2007 08:34:39 -0000 Date: 26 Jan 2007 08:34:39 -0000 From: "System Anti-Virus Administrator" To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-Tnz-Problem-Type: 40 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain Subject: Disallowed attachment type found in sent message "Important document" X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:01:21 -0000 Attention: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org A Disallowed attachment type was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. The Disallowed attachment type was reported to be: pif attachment not allowed Please contact your IT support personnel with any queries regarding this policy. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org RCPT TO: manoj@meeraco.net ... and with the following headers: --- MAILFROM: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from 59.161.43.40.static.vsnl.net.in (HELO meeraco.net) (59.161.43.40) by 0 with SMTP; 26 Jan 2007 08:33:18 -0000 From: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org To: manoj@meeraco.net Subject: Important document Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:03:20 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016----=_NextPart_000_0016" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal --- The original message is kept in: mail9.cybercon.com:/var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine/new/mail9.cybercon.com116980039949029668 where the System Anti-Virus Administrator can further diagnose it. The Email scanner reported the following when it scanned that message: --- ---perlscanner results --- Disallowed attachment type 'pif attachment not allowed' found in file /var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/mail9.cybercon.com116980039949029668/important_document3.pif ---perlscanner results --- Disallowed attachment type 'pif attachment not allowed' found in file /var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/mail9.cybercon.com116980039949029668/important_document3.pif ---