From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 14 00:07:01 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF1016A417 for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 00:07:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@ysarro.com) Received: from wroot.nepharia.org (205-200-74-154.static.mts.net [205.200.74.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1E213C45D for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 00:06:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@ysarro.com) Received: from nepharia.org (unknown [10.0.0.100]) by wroot.nepharia.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3822422864 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:06:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: by nepharia.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 dave@ysarro.com; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:06:58 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:06:57 -0500 From: Dave Curry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071014000657.GA7139@shaftoe.nepharia.org> References: <20071013035725.GA14352@shaftoe.nepharia.org> <20071014003743.38adc0d0@gumby.homeunix.com.> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071014003743.38adc0d0@gumby.homeunix.com.> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Re: PPPoE dialer CPU usage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 00:07:01 -0000 On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 12:37:43AM +0100, RW wrote: > On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:57:25 -0500 > Dave Curry wrote: > > > Hi. I was wondering if anyone had any idea what might be causing > > excessive CPU usage by the rp-pppoe dialer. What I've been running > > into is since the 5th, the message "Unexpected packet code 9" has > > been showing up every 10 seconds in syslog, the CPU usage is maxed, I > > seem to be getting pinged by my PPPoE gateway every 10 seconds, and I > > can't seem to find out what the cause of this is. Have checked other > > net traffic to no avail, tried compiling the dialer with debugging > > options which did nothing, and any sort of insight that could be > > offered at this point is dearly welcome. > > > Is there any particular reason for using the roaring-penguin version? > > ppp in the base-system works fine for me, and it uses next to no > cpu time. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Yeah, I had mistakenly compiled ppp without netgraph support (Just found that out today), so I was using rp-pppoe. Since I fixed the problem with ppp it's not vitally important to find out what hosed rp-pppoe now, though if anyone can offer info on what caused this it'd be nice to know for curiosity's sake. -- David Michael Curry (Dave) () ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org | Against proprietary extensions