Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:07:32 +0200
From:      Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>
To:        Boris Kochergin <spawk@acm.poly.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject:   TCPv4 vs. INET6 [was: Re: status of freebsd on ultrasparc?]
Message-ID:  <20080622120732.GA9540@alchemy.franken.de>
In-Reply-To: <4856CC3D.1080501@acm.poly.edu>
References:  <6e5cf6a70806051341x95eb814j6222c04dbfd7fb2d@mail.gmail.com> <20080609211208.GA66541@alchemy.franken.de> <20080609231419.F13655@ury.york.ac.uk> <484DBB64.5050607@FreeBSD.org> <20080609234022.GA18959@soaustin.net> <484DD7F1.9000003@alaska.net> <20080616191629.GA590@soaustin.net> <4856CC3D.1080501@acm.poly.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 04:25:33PM -0400, Boris Kochergin wrote:
> 
> I have a bunch of Ultra 5s which I know to work fine (with the exception 
> of 
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64/2008-March/005455.html), 

Could you please give a kernel built without INET6 but with
the patch at:
http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/in_cksum.h.diff
a try?

Marius




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080622120732.GA9540>