From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 25 11:07:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93011106564A for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 11:07:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7727D8FC25 for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 11:07:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n4PB70sB092952 for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 11:07:00 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n4PB6xBj092948 for freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 11:06:59 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 11:06:59 GMT Message-Id: <200905251106.n4PB6xBj092948@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 11:07:00 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/134488 scsi [mpt] MPT SCSI driver probes max. 8 LUNs per device o amd64/132394 scsi [isp] - bad underruns with QLogic qla2300 and amd64 o kern/132250 scsi [ciss] ciss driver does not support more then 15 drive o kern/132206 scsi [mpt] system panics on boot when mirroring and 2nd dri o kern/131032 scsi [panic] hald causing panic in scsi_sg o kern/130735 scsi [cam] [patch] pass M_NOWAIT to the malloc() call insid o kern/130621 scsi [mpt] tranfer rate is inscrutable slow when use lsi213 o kern/129602 scsi [ahd] ahd(4) gets confused and wedges SCSI bus o kern/128452 scsi [sa] [panic] Accessing SCSI tape drive randomly crashe o kern/128245 scsi [scsi] "inquiry data fails comparison at DV1 step" [re o kern/127927 scsi [isp] isp(4) target driver crashes kernel when set up o kern/126866 scsi [isp] [panic] kernel panic on card initialization o kern/124667 scsi [amd] [panic] FreeBSD-7 kernel page faults at amd-scsi o kern/123674 scsi [ahc] ahc driver dumping o kern/123666 scsi [aac] attach fails with Adaptec SAS RAID 3805 controll o sparc/121676 scsi [iscsi] iscontrol do not connect iscsi-target on sparc o kern/120487 scsi [sg] scsi_sg incompatible with scanners o kern/120247 scsi [mpt] FreeBSD 6.3 and LSI Logic 1030 = only 3.300MB/s o kern/119668 scsi [cam] [patch] certain errors are too verbose comparing o kern/114597 scsi [sym] System hangs at SCSI bus reset with dual HBAs o kern/110847 scsi [ahd] Tyan U320 onboard problem with more than 3 disks o kern/99954 scsi [ahc] reading from DVD failes on 6.x [regression] o kern/94838 scsi Kernel panic while mounting SD card with lock switch o o kern/92798 scsi [ahc] SCSI problem with timeouts o kern/90282 scsi [sym] SCSI bus resets cause loss of ch device o kern/76178 scsi [ahd] Problem with ahd and large SCSI Raid system o kern/74627 scsi [ahc] [hang] Adaptec 2940U2W Can't boot 5.3 s kern/61165 scsi [panic] kernel page fault after calling cam_send_ccb o kern/60641 scsi [sym] Sporadic SCSI bus resets with 53C810 under load o kern/60598 scsi wire down of scsi devices conflicts with config s kern/57398 scsi [mly] Current fails to install on mly(4) based RAID di o kern/52638 scsi [panic] SCSI U320 on SMP server won't run faster than o kern/44587 scsi dev/dpt/dpt.h is missing defines required for DPT_HAND o kern/40895 scsi wierd kernel / device driver bug o kern/39388 scsi ncr/sym drivers fail with 53c810 and more than 256MB m o kern/38828 scsi [dpt] [request] DPT PM2012B/90 doesn't work o kern/35234 scsi World access to /dev/pass? (for scanner) requires acce 37 problems total. From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 25 14:00:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1930E1065670 for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 14:00:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from francisco.cabrita@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f165.google.com (mail-bw0-f165.google.com [209.85.218.165]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9745D8FC14 for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 14:00:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from francisco.cabrita@gmail.com) Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so3210235bwz.43 for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 07:00:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=a9NxlSLX46KUxAFC/i5UekFK4gJqdAJto1u8DDNwmtM=; b=vYmm/koPEMfniQSOUnaPD5b07JM8wP4TnOdnYLDXfDSqCCYYJ/ceD//QlkJyNn0w4B gqWOUfIswBfGcYnGWP45qrglZLLjA6awdLvN4HOR4aouzFG+Q4kH5FVkxuNLk/oWdWax bKtdvf6U6ASI+81KUdRH/34nvSgp8/ltrWUGs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=RPYrIal+MxczSmqBiljbp9X8VEkGFv0+oo/fUqBsrdtr7QNmsrVzVmkl6x09MGv/6f nRW/qam6O+FS1RsVRushgQvkOLyBRpxV8q6moluMJCQ+FJBxuIFwijTMfG4ssPV2RouC I/R/1hgKUsv+ZQSGViIv1+zlsqeedBUAXMufQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.66.17 with SMTP id l17mr7020130bki.51.1243258240276; Mon, 25 May 2009 06:30:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 14:30:40 +0100 Message-ID: From: Francisco Cabrita To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Question about iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 14:00:53 -0000 Hi, I don't know if this ML is the right place to post a question about iSCSI. I will write it anyway. info: I have built a NAS server under FreeBSD. Geom RAID5 over 3 hard disks and iSCSI target0 created. It is up and running without problems "exporting" a SCSI driver to a Ms Windows 2000 Server with Microsoft iSCSI Inititator driver. The volume is NTFS. doubt: I have read multiple "old" posts around the web that I can't connect multiple initiators (w2k clients) to the same target. Is this true nowadays? Facts: I really need at least two w2k clients to the same "storage NAS". Any tip about how to solve this? Maybe some kind of failover technique between both w2k servers? I really appreciate your help. Thanks in advance Best Regards Francisco PS: I am thinking about sending this email to FreeBSD Cluster ML too. -- blog: http://sufixo.com/raw http://www.linkedin.com/in/franciscocabrita From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 25 15:17:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E72A106564A for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 15:17:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7E28FC1A for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 15:17:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from [172.17.2.19] (jn@stealth.jnielsen.net [74.218.226.254]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n4PEuAYJ089898; Mon, 25 May 2009 10:56:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 10:56:09 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200905251056.09987.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: Question about iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 15:17:43 -0000 On Monday 25 May 2009 09:30:40 am Francisco Cabrita wrote: > info: > I have built a NAS server under FreeBSD. Geom RAID5 over 3 hard disks > and iSCSI target0 created. > It is up and running without problems "exporting" a SCSI driver to a Ms > Windows 2000 Server with Microsoft iSCSI Inititator driver. > The volume is NTFS. > > doubt: > I have read multiple "old" posts around the web that I can't connect > multiple initiators (w2k clients) to the same target. Is this true > nowadays? You do not want two machines to have write access to the same SCSI device at the same time unless you use a filesystem designed for such access. NTFS is not such a filesystem. Just hooking two win2k boxes to the same iSCSI target to do NTFS will cause problems. Alternatives: Microsoft clustering (two or more nodes coordinate to provide certain services, the disk volume is only active on one of them at any given time) Some real clustered filesystem designed for shared access. I don't know of any for Windows off the top of my head but I haven't ever looked in to it. Use the setup you have already with one w2k client, then use Windows filesharing to export the volume to other clients. Avoid the middleman, drop iSCSI and just use Samba on the NAS box. (Or NFS if you want to dabble in Microsoft's Services for Unix... (cue scary music)) > Facts: > I really need at least two w2k clients to the same "storage NAS". Any > tip about how to solve this? > Maybe some kind of failover technique between both w2k servers? This is similar to the MS clustering option, there may be more manual ways to achieve the same effect. > I really appreciate your help. Thanks in advance > PS: I am thinking about sending this email to FreeBSD Cluster ML too. Note that if you want to stick with iSCSI on the FreeBSD side then your questions are really Microsoft-centered, so non-FreeBSD resources may be more appropriate. Questions about configuring your FreeBSD storage box to allow concurrent access by multiple clients that happen to be running Windows would be appropriate on the FreeBSD-questions mailing list. JN From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 25 15:33:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69B0106564A for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 15:33:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from francisco.cabrita@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B13A8FC08 for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 15:33:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from francisco.cabrita@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so565021fga.12 for ; Mon, 25 May 2009 08:33:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=8+OQSn1svAg9GJdF3wgWMtOHEYs4ZeTf/JlxkY4QguM=; b=xsTuoqdlMKhcKIYn1s5xi5cS34Hv3XM9Xu9Jw8/FVYIykymADTMftmbrxSPhqhm51a ZciVAqCuwzSW9UtLhV0ZnWOt9eK757wUrZI9mLBFWRZ0oXNVPvSVVFuxT5WNIAGIj1/Z PjBfgnTXAkmvXDj2NqlEGcp+Xl8NN9dp4U0O8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=O+VuDIRLkaGKzdZWOoerRrk8jNaegkKXq0xaBc7Ll4IP7Cf2lpax6oFvBcM5VZHxyx D7UsYr4qL1E/Xq+bEbFQ7RSfNGCG2JnH1w2kNdRQ/0VeNEi6XtQTt1nbdzRA9N17hqFJ +r1gW02xpitR7pIyCdc2sS3pAwUMfsYRE5lnk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.164.9 with SMTP id r9mr514250hbd.38.1243265613981; Mon, 25 May 2009 08:33:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200905251056.09987.lists@jnielsen.net> References: <200905251056.09987.lists@jnielsen.net> Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 16:33:33 +0100 Message-ID: From: Francisco Cabrita To: John Nielsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 15:33:36 -0000 Hi John, I first want to say many thanks for your reply. On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:56 PM, John Nielsen wrote: > On Monday 25 May 2009 09:30:40 am Francisco Cabrita wrote: > > info: > > I have built a NAS server under FreeBSD. Geom RAID5 over 3 hard disks > > and iSCSI target0 created. > > It is up and running without problems "exporting" a SCSI driver to a Ms > > Windows 2000 Server with Microsoft iSCSI Inititator driver. > > The volume is NTFS. > > > > doubt: > > I have read multiple "old" posts around the web that I can't connect > > multiple initiators (w2k clients) to the same target. Is this true > > nowadays? > > You do not want two machines to have write access to the same SCSI device > at the same time unless you use a filesystem designed for such access. > NTFS is not such a filesystem. Just hooking two win2k boxes to the same > iSCSI target to do NTFS will cause problems. yep I had such problems. > > > Alternatives: > Microsoft clustering (two or more nodes coordinate to provide certain > services, the disk volume is only active on one of them at any given > time) I need to seek a Windows expert down here :) > > Some real clustered filesystem designed for shared access. I don't know of > any for Windows off the top of my head but I haven't ever looked in to > it. > Use the setup you have already with one w2k client, then use Windows > filesharing to export the volume to other clients. > Avoid the middleman, drop iSCSI and just use Samba on the NAS box. (Or NFS > if you want to dabble in Microsoft's Services for Unix... (cue scary > music)) In another company I have another FreeBSD NAS exporting a NFS volume to another FreeBSD Samba server, on wich I share some directories to Ms XP clients. I have no iSCSI on it and it's just fine. Almost 3 years up and running. Avoiding iSCSI it's a nice possibility but, on this new scenario the volumes are exported to both w2k PDC and w2k BDC. My client relies upon a very granular permission scheme. I don't know if I can handle this without a NTFS volume. (If I'm not wrong, we can't format a NTFS partition under FreeBSD) > > > > Facts: > > I really need at least two w2k clients to the same "storage NAS". Any > > tip about how to solve this? > > Maybe some kind of failover technique between both w2k servers? > > This is similar to the MS clustering option, there may be more manual ways > to achieve the same effect. I prefer not to use manual tasks. > > > I really appreciate your help. Thanks in advance > > PS: I am thinking about sending this email to FreeBSD Cluster ML too. > > Note that if you want to stick with iSCSI on the FreeBSD side then your > questions are really Microsoft-centered, so non-FreeBSD resources may be > more appropriate. Questions about configuring your FreeBSD storage box to > allow concurrent access by multiple clients that happen to be running > Windows would be appropriate on the FreeBSD-questions mailing list. Yes you are totally right. I just want to say I am truly grateful about your reply because my primary doubt was about the possibility or not to "map" multiple initiators to one target. And, where is the best place to ask a thing and get a really valid answer? yep FreeBSD ML :) I will try to explore your tips about MS Clustering. Once again Thanks Francisco Cabrita > > > JN > -- blog: http://sufixo.com/raw http://www.linkedin.com/in/franciscocabrita From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 26 15:05:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7301B1065673 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 15:05:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-scsi@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E962F8FC16 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 15:05:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-scsi@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1M8xtE-0006Sb-MW for freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 14:44:29 +0000 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 14:44:28 +0000 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 14:44:28 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:44:23 +0200 Lines: 42 Message-ID: References: <200905251056.09987.lists@jnielsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig47199D2AED4B58E86DA949EA" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090409) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Sender: news Subject: Re: Question about iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 15:05:02 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig47199D2AED4B58E86DA949EA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Francisco Cabrita wrote: > Avoiding iSCSI it's a nice possibility but, on this new scenario the vo= lumes > are exported to both w2k PDC and w2k BDC. My client relies upon a very > granular permission scheme. I don't know if I can handle this without a= NTFS > volume. (If I'm not wrong, we can't format a NTFS partition under FreeB= SD) No, and it wouldn't be of any use to you since Samba would still see it as a POSIX file system. OTOH, Samba has some rudimentary support for ACLs (it's a built-time option) and UFS2 has ACL support by default, though it needs to be enabled in fstab (see mount(8)), so depending on how convoluted are your requirements, it might or might not work. See for example: http://aisalen.wordpress.com/2007/08/10/acls-on-samba/ --------------enig47199D2AED4B58E86DA949EA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkocAEcACgkQldnAQVacBchc5ACg9Te9NSuTeFKq56ZVtjqPhYu8 6OYAoIHB5L1LNGBEaDQFYU37BlImTjCw =h4rm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig47199D2AED4B58E86DA949EA-- From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 26 15:44:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB64E106566C for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 15:44:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from francisco.cabrita@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com [209.85.218.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FF28FC0A for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 15:44:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from francisco.cabrita@gmail.com) Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so3991918bwz.43 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 08:44:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=rCicnXsmmRoF+6ZyKeraA87ROmhhmI4afvvvdkJ+vz8=; b=vrUOWDmoOSlAb6dP9GOcypQfYAOmunBchSAX0nUa3hqepk5EO+WHAYGybji2RVAhDx ibl0r47fQ62I7Na5bhZVDyx+U9964aCTZ7OaAyLEEQk3EDRo/lBtf//Rr3XTxknFgwk3 fT8S7b0iFwfteUKjcU7hqOfBZeJAe2tf9+OJg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=QBBVkKRqEPBFx/ok9HnjygU4ErAmxHRelHFzE+1ylSxq7IKcI95u+NSqfQM0lJjWEx VIS3BCBJbvTFMj10jsPYOy2+YAmNpR1XsZQSXNJVViZdjc0/tAsV15kvJqeElMb4igRS /11ZvkfnbIQvnz8zVxdbTC365E9gSi+xKXANQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.51.130 with SMTP id d2mr8323263bkg.12.1243352640755; Tue, 26 May 2009 08:44:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <200905251056.09987.lists@jnielsen.net> Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:44:00 +0100 Message-ID: From: Francisco Cabrita To: Ivan Voras Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about iSCSI X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 15:44:03 -0000 Hi Ivan, On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > Francisco Cabrita wrote: > > > Avoiding iSCSI it's a nice possibility but, on this new scenario the > volumes > > are exported to both w2k PDC and w2k BDC. My client relies upon a very > > granular permission scheme. I don't know if I can handle this without a > NTFS > > volume. (If I'm not wrong, we can't format a NTFS partition under > FreeBSD) > > No, and it wouldn't be of any use to you since Samba would still see it > as a POSIX file system. > > > OTOH, Samba has some rudimentary support for ACLs (it's a built-time > option) and UFS2 has ACL support by default, though it needs to be > enabled in fstab (see mount(8)), so depending on how convoluted are your > requirements, it might or might not work. > > See for example: http://aisalen.wordpress.com/2007/08/10/acls-on-samba/ > Oh great! This sounds very very good and simple too! Resume 1) we have "options UFS_ACL" in our generic; so I can use UFS2 to host user data; 2) Build Samba 3 with "ACL_SUPPORT=3Dyes"; 3) Add acls flag to fstab. Et voi l=E1. Tests, lots of tests. You guys really opened my mind! I don't know yet if I'm gonna use this way on this particular project, but is very nice to know this stuff. Once again, Many thanks :) Best Regards, Francisco Cabrita --=20 blog: http://sufixo.com/raw http://www.linkedin.com/in/franciscocabrita