From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 16 10:28:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B452106568B; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:28:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rink@rink.nu) Received: from mx1.rink.nu (gloom.rink.nu [213.34.49.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA9C8FC16; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.rink.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7057E6D423; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:30:33 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rink.nu Received: from mx1.rink.nu ([213.34.49.2]) by localhost (gloom.rink.nu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jwyW5B7-jg7u; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:30:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mx1.rink.nu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0B82B6D41E; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:30:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:30:30 +0200 From: Rink Springer To: Robert Watson Message-ID: <20090816103030.GA11725@rink.nu> References: <20090803152202.GB61519@rink.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: David Boyd , Rink Springer , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FW: 8.0-BETA2 sysinstall ignoring setting of nonInteractive X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:28:33 -0000 On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 07:33:35PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Rink Springer wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:04:31AM -0400, David Boyd wrote: > >> Can someone "PLEASE" commit this fix. > > > > This fix looks OK to me; I'll ask re@ for permission. > > Just a status update: this is in the re@ queue but approval is pending > completion of the stable/7 branch. The plan is that this should appear in > beta3. It has been committed (r196272) and merged to 8, which means it will be in BETA3 and 8.0-RELEASE. Thank you for your persistance and patience. Regards, -- Rink P.W. Springer - http://rink.nu "Beauty often seduces us on the road to truth." - Dr. Wilson From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 16 14:59:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6917F1065690; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:59:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver.pntr@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25CA8FC60; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:59:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 13so564835fge.12 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 07:59:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8hpT8qrPz6aYuULIuuoZF1l13fF2+vHKt5bUjlIm25Q=; b=hzDo6NB5sICyGHgYT0PtQnMxqfxNy37RApEwczUHp2LZID6lfC/oBIb+5Ms1NWFZ7j iHGAoBexJdbPSKKky1kQIlPc2akF36jUywpGCzSpndf2eWN9EGM2p9NHftVl5+bXnrRn HZhdEPzWfBnZY90MSI2n+dHeYJ/5u3UWz/y3A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jL3avMIIK1Op667h/8+CKGj27CE+9pN1lISgcCPm7a7hP1/t2tq6WWadPQGTOxCBTp m0pDceFaoO5NamFQFZ4/b31zg5DvZFFQibCYXnj9fCOZ50X0Qo6nF1WYsdFdSUfzn/CL WHZpdQYyOyojuM2o7M3/BivWrZjDJ+o9iKPuI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.227.26 with SMTP id z26mr1958693fgg.76.1250434776368; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 07:59:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6101e8c40907121321v3e307e06l27c318ed3956197@mail.gmail.com> References: <6101e8c40907091755n5aefe289r6eec14cf7f4287dc@mail.gmail.com> <6101e8c40907100517q2d2e5891m62b0b7d57496b10@mail.gmail.com> <6101e8c40907121321v3e307e06l27c318ed3956197@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 16:59:36 +0200 Message-ID: <6101e8c40908160759w6ba32493jac233be83d23f2b9@mail.gmail.com> From: Oliver Pinter To: "Robert N. M. Watson" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: smbfs panic when lost connection or unmount --force X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:59:38 -0000 hi! Have you any sequel in this error / bug? On 7/12/09, Oliver Pinter wrote: > On 7/12/09, Robert N. M. Watson wrote: >> >> On 10 Jul 2009, at 13:17, Oliver Pinter wrote: >> >>> I know, that the bt is useful, but ddb works with usb keyboard? >>> At nigth then I send the log. >> >> Unfortunately, a known issue with FreeBSD 8.0 is that the new USB >> stack, while a vast improvement over the previous USB stack in >> countless ways, does not support polled access from DDB. You will need >> to use a serial port, firewire port, ps/2, or AT keyboard in order to >> get interactive DDB support. >> > it worked with usb keyboard, the pictured and the last log is made > with usb keyboard.. > >> If that's not feasible, or if it's just easier, you may be able to use >> the DDB scripting facility + textdumps to run DDB commands >> automatically on panic to produce useful debugging output. Take a look >> at the textdump(4) man page for details. This can be combined with a >> traditional crashdump to capture both DDB output and normal dump data >> for use with kgdb. > jeah, I readed the man (ddb and textdump), and I used a small script.. > >> >> Robert >> > > thanks for the help >>> >>> //sorry for bad english >>> >>> ps.: attached the config >>> >>> On 7/10/09, Robert Watson wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Oliver Pinter wrote: >>>> >>>>> It is a kernel panic, when force unmount the smbfs volume or lost >>>>> the >>>>> connection with the samba server. >>>> >>>> This is a NULL pointer dereference in the kernel. Per Attilio's e- >>>> mail, a >>>> stack trace should help us track it down. Thanks! >>>> >>>> Robert N M Watson >>>> Computer Laboratory >>>> University of Cambridge >>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Thes OS is: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> kern.ostype: FreeBSD >>>>> kern.osrelease: 7.2-STABLE >>>>> kern.osrevision: 199506 >>>>> kern.version: FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #4: Sat Jun 27 21:44:32 CEST 2009 >>>>> root@oliverp:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/stable >>>>> kern.osreldate: 702103 >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> make.conf: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> CPUTYPE?=core2 >>>>> CFLAGS= -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe >>>>> MODULES_OVERRIDE=smbfs libiconv libmchain zfs opensolaris drm cd9660 >>>>> cd9660_iconv >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> panic message: >>>>> >>>>> Jul 10 01:58:39 oliverp syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/ >>>>> kernel >>>>> Jul 10 01:58:39 oliverp kernel: kernel trap 12 with interrupts >>>>> disabled >>>>> Jul 10 01:58:39 oliverp kernel: >>>>> Jul 10 01:58:39 oliverp kernel: >>>>> Jul 10 01:58:39 oliverp kernel: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in >>>>> kernel >>>>> mode >>>>> Jul 10 01:58:39 oliverp kernel: cpuid = 2; apic id = 02 >>>>> Jul 10 01:58:39 oliverp kernel: fault virtual address = 0x30 >>>>> Jul 10 01:58:39 oliverp kernel: fault code = supervisor read data, >>>>> page not present >>>>> Jul 10 01:58:39 oliverp kernel: instruction pointer = >>>>> 0x8:0xffffffff80327fd0 >>>>> Jul 10 01:58:39 oliverp kernel: stack pointer = >>>>> 0x10:0xffffff8078360940 >>>>> Jul 10 01:58:39 oliverp kernel: frame pointer = >>>>> 0x10:0xffffff0004c31390 >>>>> Jul 10 01:58:39 oliverp kernel: code segment = base 0x0, limit >>>>> 0xfffff, type 0x1b >>>>> Jul 10 01:58:39 oliverp kernel: = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, >>>>> gran 1 >>>>> Jul 10 01:58:39 oliverp kernel: processor eflags = resume, IOPL = 0 >>>>> Jul 10 01:58:39 oliverp kernel: current process = 60406 (smbiod0) >>>>> Jul 10 01:58:39 oliverp kernel: trap number = 12 >>>>> Jul 10 01:58:39 oliverp kernel: panic: page fault >>>>> Jul 10 01:58:39 oliverp kernel: cpuid = 2 >>>>> Jul 10 01:58:39 oliverp kernel: Uptime: 6h51m16s >>>>> Jul 10 01:58:39 oliverp kernel: Physical memory: 4087 MB >>>>> Jul 10 01:58:39 oliverp kernel: Dumping 2448 MB:Copyright (c) >>>>> 1992-2009 The FreeBSD Project. >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org >>>>> >>>>> " >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 16 17:32:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E541065695 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:32:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jensrasmus@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com (mail-bw0-f219.google.com [209.85.218.219]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9002F8FC59 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:32:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so2638203bwz.37 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:32:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type; bh=qEFqU2//VSFbptLiTtHwcpXIs+lacuMEc435zIwIXzY=; b=XQObXchkbl1eK5aTJkYpZzmQC0jHr6h+ggtRNOLciI50G0IWLVUQVODCNKVkJO7Rky 9ogkWqzc9X6bOXu34TSzfTvlQQVjLvTvjN8YDRYb5SFk/qoNru0To+r9cnvXcILQR6mt cJDrxQyaUH1XonfbW2NEmKp5Q+2jUtf8cK7ew= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; b=llDcmqS0XYS3oLEJleyKF0wa8yuynqqlwAxBFuP4lalgcy54A8CrEPdSCEnaGUzijq wlIHdPfLRldQyxpZKO1Y6H14zFbm9ACmvML4dQyDXJXB2tgFM1O9wH8sd/+/LBEkvr2f 6BxiGweBoct14uEXE76a4a0v7/lU8H8+7fsxs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.123.200 with SMTP id q8mt1783298bkr.199.1250443937212; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:32:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <63e02e980907310725t2b38d1d3iff66aca3948ac8dd@mail.gmail.com> <63e02e980908020954r65b6b4b5n8288f0f5e3b14568@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 19:32:17 +0200 Message-ID: <63e02e980908161032y60c4c966v2918b34c83397fee@mail.gmail.com> From: Jens Rasmus Liland Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: How do I mount an external ntfs formatted harddisk manually and through /etc/fstab? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:32:19 -0000 Hi, Sorry for the late reply - I went on vacation for a while. I think 'mount_ntfs-3g' did the trick in terms of mounting /dev/da0s1 manually. But I tried to add /dev/da0s1 /homewd ntfs-3g ro 0 0 ... but then the computer panicked, and went into single user mode. I think it happened because the ntfs-3g module is loaded later with the fusefs-stuff. How to get around this one? On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:19 PM, CmdLnKid wrote: > On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 12:54 -0000, jensrasmus wrote: > > I'm forwarding this to -stable list, since i appears to get no response on >> -fs. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Jens Rasmus Liland >> Date: Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:25 PM >> Subject: How do I mount an external ntfs formatted harddisk manually and >> through /etc/fstab? >> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org >> >> >> Hi, >> >> How do I mount an NTFS formatted external harddisk plugged into the >> computer >> using a usb cable? And what do i write in the /etc/fstab after being able >> to >> successfully mount it manually? >> >> I have some blurry understanding after reading a bit in handbook that the >> harddisk's NTFS partition is at /dev/da0s1 by default. I have installed >> ntfs-3g from ports. >> >> /Rasmus >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> > Try mount_ntfs-3g /dev/da0s1 /path/to/mountpoint > > Manuals and other such documentation serve as a pretty good medium. > > -- > > - (2^(N-1)) > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 16 18:02:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7E8106568C for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:02:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC69D8FC15 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:02:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Mcjn5-0003X1-RQ for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:45:11 -0700 Message-ID: <24995981.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:45:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Umar To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: unix.co@gmail.com Subject: Netowrk Card BCE not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:02:19 -0000 Dear Members! I have recently Install FreeBSD 7.2 amd64 on DELL R610. After successfuly installation network cards are not working and i got error bce0: /usr/src/dev/bce/if_bce.c(1386): Unable to write CTX memory: cid_addr = 0x0000008, offset = 0x00000080 Would you please help me what should I do? Regards, Umar -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Netowrk-Card-BCE-not-working-tp24995981p24995981.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 16 19:25:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F24106568D; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 19:25:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cliftonr@lava.net) Received: from outgoing02.lava.net (pie.lava.net [IPv6:2001:1888:0:1:230:48ff:fe5b:3b8c]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B4F8FC41; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 19:25:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from malasada.lava.net (malasada.lava.net [64.65.64.17]) by outgoing02.lava.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85E41707B5; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 09:25:22 -1000 (HST) Received: by malasada.lava.net (Postfix, from userid 102) id 36A8F153882; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 09:25:22 -1000 (HST) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 09:25:22 -1000 From: Clifton Royston To: Jens Rasmus Liland Message-ID: <20090816192521.GA4926@lava.net> Mail-Followup-To: Jens Rasmus Liland , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <63e02e980907310725t2b38d1d3iff66aca3948ac8dd@mail.gmail.com> <63e02e980908020954r65b6b4b5n8288f0f5e3b14568@mail.gmail.com> <63e02e980908161032y60c4c966v2918b34c83397fee@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <63e02e980908161032y60c4c966v2918b34c83397fee@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: How do I mount an external ntfs formatted harddisk manually and through /etc/fstab? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 19:25:23 -0000 On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 07:32:17PM +0200, Jens Rasmus Liland wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for the late reply - I went on vacation for a while. > > I think 'mount_ntfs-3g' did the trick in terms of mounting /dev/da0s1 > manually. But I tried to add > > /dev/da0s1 /homewd ntfs-3g ro 0 0 > > ... but then the computer panicked, and went into single user mode. I think > it happened because the ntfs-3g module is loaded later with the > fusefs-stuff. How to get around this one? Solution 1: Try changing "ro" to "ro,noauto" and mount it later. Solution 2: Instead, try adding "late" to the options, so that it will not be mounted until later in the boot process, after /usr and other normal filesystems are mounted. As you say the filesystem type was added from ports, your problem might be that the OS is trying to mount it before /usr is mounted, and the fs module is not available, although that shouldn't generate a panic. My 2 cents, -- Clifton -- Clifton Royston -- cliftonr@iandicomputing.com / cliftonr@lava.net President - I and I Computing * http://www.iandicomputing.com/ Custom programming, network design, systems and network consulting services From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 16 19:38:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B176C106568B for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 19:38:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pluknet@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f205.google.com (mail-fx0-f205.google.com [209.85.220.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1068E8FC5A for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 19:38:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm1 with SMTP id 1so1940417fxm.7 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:38:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=iWVK0McqImzHRkilKg+ZgDkfMSpqvwDjFBZAvs17Pts=; b=YL8zgCDn8yw4daEytUkPNnS7SyN8IPw4bntxwg9i6hA4r5S5q4xPxqG6kYBB24ze2k ODxdanV0A6J+bZuBPSxB81rfRB4P1Ulj/qQblK/x5cL9Ge3zM+kwtZ2TRUJyrLZkxvv9 A1saTHEB9GK0/TKtakzLPmUfRFseINHujJ4gE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wYXNOQqQhK43Iws1tLYxQEDrhhnPfHAN2CR1FAQhCehwiXGOmmu3xfaqJT0xkj+KV9 zo28ppxiF15eNFFhbIsdHT0swyMpy6/T4O61/7GnTgb4BmaxketYQtOsZQ34aHzqpyj9 ZV16SV8+x4AUs6K61Zksai8Wn/crUwh4yfXdE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.64.136 with SMTP id e8mr1429558bki.49.1250451497901; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:38:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <63e02e980908161032y60c4c966v2918b34c83397fee@mail.gmail.com> References: <63e02e980907310725t2b38d1d3iff66aca3948ac8dd@mail.gmail.com> <63e02e980908020954r65b6b4b5n8288f0f5e3b14568@mail.gmail.com> <63e02e980908161032y60c4c966v2918b34c83397fee@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:38:17 +0400 Message-ID: From: pluknet To: Jens Rasmus Liland Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: How do I mount an external ntfs formatted harddisk manually and through /etc/fstab? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 19:38:19 -0000 2009/8/16 Jens Rasmus Liland : > Hi, > > Sorry for the late reply - I went on vacation for a while. > > I think 'mount_ntfs-3g' did the trick in terms of mounting /dev/da0s1 > manually. But I tried to add > > /dev/da0s1 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0/homewd =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 ntfs-3g =A0= =A0ro =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00 =A0 =A0 =A0 0 > Since 7.2 new parameter -o mountprog was introduced so you should be able to set in fstab mounting with 3th party program like this: /dev/acd0 /mnt ntfs ro,noauto,mountprog=3D/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g 0 0 > ... but then the computer panicked, and went into single user mode. I thi= nk > it happened because the ntfs-3g module is loaded later with the > fusefs-stuff. Or due to the wrong/unsupported syntax. --=20 wbr, pluknet From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 17 07:18:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E41106568D for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:18:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@kkip.pl) Received: from mainframe.kkip.pl (kkip.pl [87.105.164.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03288FC61 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:18:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mb01.admin.lan.kkip.pl ([10.66.3.254]) by mainframe.kkip.pl with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1McwTr-0000Hu-36; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:18:13 +0200 Message-ID: <4A890433.1070809@kkip.pl> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:18:11 +0200 From: Bartosz Stec User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johan Hendriks References: <57200BF94E69E54880C9BB1AF714BBCB5DEAEB@w2003s01.double-l.local> In-Reply-To: <57200BF94E69E54880C9BB1AF714BBCB5DEAEB@w2003s01.double-l.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-User: admin@kkip.pl X-Authenticator: plain X-Sender-Verify: SUCCEEDED (sender exists & accepts mail) X-Spam-Score: -8.9 X-Spam-Score-Int: -88 X-Exim-Version: 4.69 (build at 07-Jul-2009 09:56:56) X-Date: 2009-08-17 09:18:13 X-Connected-IP: 10.66.3.254:1511 X-Message-Linecount: 60 X-Body-Linecount: 46 X-Message-Size: 2169 X-Body-Size: 1480 X-Received-Count: 1 X-Recipient-Count: 3 X-Local-Recipient-Count: 3 X-Local-Recipient-Defer-Count: 0 X-Local-Recipient-Fail-Count: 0 Cc: Dan Allen , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Going to BSD 8 from RELENG_7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:18:18 -0000 Johan Hendriks pisze: > Be aware that if you go from 7 to 8 you will need to rebuild all your > installed ports. > ALso if you do a buildworld from 7 to 8 do not do the make delete-old > and the make delete-old-libs before you have rebuild your ports. > If you do the make delete-old and make delete-old-libs runs, all ports > depending on the FreeBSD 7 libs will not work any more. << read: most > likely all your ports. > If you have changed for example your Shell for root to a ports based > shell like bash and you do the make delete-old-libs you can not log in > anymore, because bash depends on the 7 libs wich are not there anymore. > > And as usual MAKE A GOOD BACKUP !!!! > > Regards, > Johan > > > As I remember when I did upgrade from FreBSD 6.4 to 7.0, I ran 'portupgrade -afi' after thar, BUT as I remember all my ports in fact works before they were upgraded. If I understand correctly, the reason of this was not making delete-old and delete-old-libs? So should following upgrade procedure be painless? 0. Backup! 1. cvsup 8.0-stable 2. make buildworld && make buildkernel 3. make installkernel 4. reboot and jump to single user mode 5. make installworld && mergemastger 6. take a deep breath & reboot 7. portupgrade -afi 8. make delete-old && make delete-old-libs 9. reboot 10. Hooray! My concern is - will my ports works after point 6. ? Quite important thing when machine can't be offline by hours during portupgrade -afi .... -- Bartosz Stec From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 17 08:25:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F97710656DD for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:25:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (tunnel490.ipv6.xs4all.nl [IPv6:2001:888:10:1ea::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851838FC16 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:25:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n7H8PLSd004626; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:25:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n7H8PLlu004625; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:25:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:25:20 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot To: Bartosz Stec Message-ID: <20090817082520.GA4448@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , Bartosz Stec , Johan Hendriks , Dan Allen , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <57200BF94E69E54880C9BB1AF714BBCB5DEAEB@w2003s01.double-l.local> <4A890433.1070809@kkip.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A890433.1070809@kkip.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ei.bzerk.org X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (ei.bzerk.org [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:25:24 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Dan Allen , Johan Hendriks , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Going to BSD 8 from RELENG_7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:25:40 -0000 On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 09:18:11AM +0200, Bartosz Stec typed: > > > >And as usual MAKE A GOOD BACKUP !!!! > > > >Regards, > >Johan > > > As I remember when I did upgrade from FreBSD 6.4 to 7.0, I ran > 'portupgrade -afi' after thar, BUT as I remember all my ports in fact > works before they were upgraded. If I understand correctly, the reason > of this was not making delete-old and delete-old-libs? > > So should following upgrade procedure be painless? > > 0. Backup! > 1. cvsup 8.0-stable > 2. make buildworld && make buildkernel > 3. make installkernel > 4. reboot and jump to single user mode > 5. make installworld && mergemastger > 6. take a deep breath & reboot > 7. portupgrade -afi > 8. make delete-old && make delete-old-libs > 9. reboot > 10. Hooray! > > My concern is - will my ports works after point 6. ? Quite important > thing when machine can't be offline by hours during portupgrade -afi .... What do you want to hear? "Yes, all will be fine" ? There's never such guarantee. If it means that much to you, MAKE A GOOD BACKUP. And be prepared to restore it. And if the machine really can't be offline for some hours, you should have a fallback machine anyway which you could use to test it on. cheers, Ruben From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 17 08:40:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CFFA106568B for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:40:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@kkip.pl) Received: from mainframe.kkip.pl (kkip.pl [87.105.164.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA9E8FC41 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:40:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mb01.admin.lan.kkip.pl ([10.66.3.254]) by mainframe.kkip.pl with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1McxlX-00047V-O1; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:40:34 +0200 Message-ID: <4A89177F.5090908@kkip.pl> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:40:31 +0200 From: Bartosz Stec User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruben de Groot , Johan Hendriks , Dan Allen , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <57200BF94E69E54880C9BB1AF714BBCB5DEAEB@w2003s01.double-l.local> <4A890433.1070809@kkip.pl> <20090817082520.GA4448@ei.bzerk.org> In-Reply-To: <20090817082520.GA4448@ei.bzerk.org> X-Stationery: 0.4.10 X-Authenticated-User: admin@kkip.pl X-Authenticator: plain X-Sender-Verify: SUCCEEDED (sender exists & accepts mail) X-Spam-Score: -8.9 X-Spam-Score-Int: -88 X-Exim-Version: 4.69 (build at 07-Jul-2009 09:56:56) X-Date: 2009-08-17 10:40:34 X-Connected-IP: 10.66.3.254:2429 X-Message-Linecount: 170 X-Body-Linecount: 154 X-Message-Size: 6040 X-Body-Size: 5265 X-Received-Count: 1 X-Recipient-Count: 4 X-Local-Recipient-Count: 4 X-Local-Recipient-Defer-Count: 0 X-Local-Recipient-Fail-Count: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Going to BSD 8 from RELENG_7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:40:37 -0000 Ruben de Groot pisze: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 09:18:11AM +0200, Bartosz Stec typed: > >>> And as usual MAKE A GOOD BACKUP !!!! >>> >>> Regards, >>> Johan >>> >>> >> As I remember when I did upgrade from FreBSD 6.4 to 7.0, I ran >> 'portupgrade -afi' after thar, BUT as I remember all my ports in fact >> works before they were upgraded. If I understand correctly, the reason >> of this was not making delete-old and delete-old-libs? >> >> So should following upgrade procedure be painless? >> >> 0. Backup! >> 1. cvsup 8.0-stable >> 2. make buildworld && make buildkernel >> 3. make installkernel >> 4. reboot and jump to single user mode >> 5. make installworld && mergemastger >> 6. take a deep breath & reboot >> 7. portupgrade -afi >> 8. make delete-old && make delete-old-libs >> 9. reboot >> 10. Hooray! >> >> My concern is - will my ports works after point 6. ? Quite important >> thing when machine can't be offline by hours during portupgrade -afi .... >> > > What do you want to hear? "Yes, all will be fine" ? There's never such guarantee. > If it means that much to you, MAKE A GOOD BACKUP. And be prepared to restore it. > And if the machine really can't be offline for some hours, you should have a > fallback machine anyway which you could use to test it on. > > cheers, > Ruben > > Oh well, I don't want to hear any guarantees :) . Simple 'It should be OK' or 'You will probably get into troubles with this procedure so use test machine first' would be great. Fortunately Johan Hendriks already gave me answer that explained everything: > If the old libs are still there all ports will work after the reboot. > So a reboot should do no harm. > To test this, try it First on a spare box. > this way you will see the problems, or issues if they arise. > > Also make sure your hardware is fully supported by FreeBSD 8, I always > put in a livecd and try all my drive's and mirrors and so on. > > Also be aware that the libusb port is in the base system on 8. > And i do not know if they work on a 8 system with the libusb port > installed. > > But it sounds like a server so there should be little ports that needs > libusb. Thank you Johan. -- Bartosz Stec From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 17 09:07:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B277106568D for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:07:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ari@ish.com.au) Received: from fish.ish.com.au (eth5921.nsw.adsl.internode.on.net [59.167.240.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0DF38FC41 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:07:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ip-149.ish.com.au ([203.29.62.149]:54597) by fish.ish.com.au with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MczKI-0003tH-2F; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:20:30 +1000 Message-ID: <4A891DBE.2070403@ish.com.au> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:07:10 +1000 From: Aristedes Maniatis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3pre) Gecko/20090807 Shredder/3.0b4pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Allen References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List Subject: Re: Going to BSD 8 from RELENG_7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:07:14 -0000 On 14/08/09 11:12 AM, Dan Allen wrote: > I cvsup and build RELENG_7 many times a week. This has served me well > (except for the ZFS boot problem I had that went in and was backed > out) for quite a while. > > I like to track a STABLE release. When BSD 7 went to 7.1 and to 7.2, > it all just happened automatically with the way I do things. > > Now I am interested on one of my BSD machines to try 8.0. I need to > change my cvsup target from RELENG_7 to CURRENT I believe. Is that > true? When will STABLE become 8.0? Since I see you are updating from 7 to 8 and are running ZFS, you may be bitten by the fact that ZFS will not work after you install the new kernel. See the last comment here: http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2009-07-11-freebsd-update-to-8.0-beta1.html Ari --------------------------> ish http://www.ish.com.au Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001 GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 17 09:21:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 857BE106568B; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:21:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from mail-gw0.york.ac.uk (mail-gw0.york.ac.uk [144.32.128.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E948FC43; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:21:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gw6.york.ac.uk (mail-gw6.york.ac.uk [144.32.129.26]) by mail-gw0.york.ac.uk (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n7H8oBIv004613; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:50:11 +0100 (BST) Received: from buffy-128.york.ac.uk ([144.32.128.160] helo=buffy.york.ac.uk) by mail-gw6.york.ac.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Mcxut-0002At-Lf; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:50:11 +0100 Received: from buffy.york.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by buffy.york.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n7H8oBxB033008; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:50:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: (from ga9@localhost) by buffy.york.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n7H8oBvL033007; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:50:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: buffy.york.ac.uk: ga9 set sender to gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk using -f From: Gavin Atkinson To: Jens Rasmus Liland In-Reply-To: <63e02e980908161032y60c4c966v2918b34c83397fee@mail.gmail.com> References: <63e02e980907310725t2b38d1d3iff66aca3948ac8dd@mail.gmail.com> <63e02e980908020954r65b6b4b5n8288f0f5e3b14568@mail.gmail.com> <63e02e980908161032y60c4c966v2918b34c83397fee@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:50:10 +0100 Message-Id: <1250499010.32945.1.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-York-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-York-MailScanner-From: gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: How do I mount an external ntfs formatted harddisk manually and through /etc/fstab? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:21:10 -0000 On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 19:32 +0200, Jens Rasmus Liland wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for the late reply - I went on vacation for a while. > > I think 'mount_ntfs-3g' did the trick in terms of mounting /dev/da0s1 > manually. But I tried to add > > /dev/da0s1 /homewd ntfs-3g ro 0 0 > > ... but then the computer panicked, and went into single user mode. I think > it happened because the ntfs-3g module is loaded later with the > fusefs-stuff. How to get around this one? Make sure you have recompiled fusefs, ntfs-3g and any other ports that they rely on since you last upgraded your kernel/world. The fusefs kernel module seems to be quite sensitive to changes in the kernel itself. Gavin From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 17 09:29:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B669C106568B for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:29:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de) Received: from mrelay1.uni-hannover.de (mrelay1.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.106]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01AF58FC57 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.pmp.uni-hannover.de (www.pmp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.117.2]) by mrelay1.uni-hannover.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n7H9EZ2Q010066; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:14:36 +0200 Received: from pmp.uni-hannover.de (arc.pmp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.117.1]) by www.pmp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 03BD04F; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:14:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:14:34 +0200 From: Gerrit =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChn?= To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20090817111434.3de57a6a.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> In-Reply-To: <20090309083306.GL5039@michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <8dfae1c10901070639x67945324jeeecfcac647d7976@mail.gmail.com> <200901191833.51320.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <20090120024519.GB79785@cdnetworks.co.kr> <200903071717.57915.ianjhart@ntlworld.com> <20090308023642.GB1531@michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr> <20090309092131.790f719d.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <20090309083306.GL5039@michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr> Organization: Albert-Einstein-Institut (MPI =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=FCr?= Gravitationsphysik & IGP =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Universit=E4t?= Hannover) X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.5.5.374460, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.1.369594, Antispam-Data: 2009.8.17.90623 Cc: pyunyh@gmail.com Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.1 (and 7.2) Breaks re and rl Network Interface Drivers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:29:38 -0000 On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 17:33:06 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon wrote about Re: FreeBSD 7.1 Breaks re and rl Network Interface Drivers: PY> > I cannot say if the actual issue I had with 7.1-stable has gone PY> > away, too, because this only occured after a longer time of PY> > operation. However, up to now everything looks nice. PY> Ok, if you find any re(4) instability feel free to contact me. Ok, took some time, but here I am. :-) It seems I have two different version of the Jetway mainboard here (one with 25W total power consumption and one with 12W I guess). Anyway, my version of 7.1 with your patches is running fine on this board: --- Copyright (c) 1992-2009 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE #0: Tue Mar 24 12:46:03 CET 2009 root@xenon:/usr/tmp/usr/obj/usr/work/current/src/sys/FIREFLY Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: VIA C7-D Processor 1500MHz (1500.02-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "CentaurHauls" Id = 0x6d0 Stepping = 0 Features=0xa7c9baff Features2=0x4001 VIA Padlock Features=0xffcc real memory = 1055784960 (1006 MB) avail memory = 1023750144 (976 MB) kbd1 at kbdmux0 cryptosoft0: on motherboard padlock0: on motherboard acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: [ITHREAD] acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed acpi0: reservation of 100000, 3ede0000 (3) failed Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x408-0x40b on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci_link2: BIOS IRQ 5 for 0.9.INTA is invalid pci_link2: BIOS IRQ 5 for 0.16.INTC is invalid pci_link2: BIOS IRQ 5 for 0.17.INTC is invalid pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 vgapci0: mem 0xf4000000-0xf7ffffff,0xfb000000-0xfbffffff irq 11 at device 0.0 on pci1 re0: port 0xf000-0xf0ff mem 0xfdfff000-0xfdfff0ff irq 10 at device 9.0 on pci0 re0: Chip rev. 0x18000000 re0: MAC rev. 0x00000000 miibus0: on re0 rgephy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 rgephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto re0: Ethernet address: 00:30:18:a7:8a:1c re0: [FILTER] re1: port 0xf200-0xf2ff mem 0xfdffe000-0xfdffe0ff irq 10 at device 11.0 on pci0 re1: Chip rev. 0x18000000 re1: MAC rev. 0x00000000 miibus1: on re1 rgephy1: PHY 1 on miibus1 rgephy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto re1: Ethernet address: 00:30:18:a7:8a:1d re1: [FILTER] atapci0: port 0xff00-0xff07,0xfe00-0xfe03,0xfd00-0xfd07,0xfc00-0xfc03,0xfb00-0xfb0f,0xf400-0xf4ff irq 11 at device 15.0 on pci0 atapci0: [ITHREAD] ata2: on atapci0 ata2: [ITHREAD] ata3: on atapci0 ata3: [ITHREAD] atapci1: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xfa00-0xfa0f at device 15.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci1 ata0: [ITHREAD] ata1: on atapci1 ata1: [ITHREAD] uhci0: port 0xf900-0xf91f irq 11 at device 16.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci0: [ITHREAD] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: on usb0 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xf800-0xf81f irq 11 at device 16.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci1: [ITHREAD] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: on usb1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0xf700-0xf71f irq 11 at device 16.2 on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci2: [ITHREAD] usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: on usb2 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3: port 0xf600-0xf61f irq 11 at device 16.3 on pci0 uhci3: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci3: [ITHREAD] usb3: on uhci3 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: on usb3 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xfdffd000-0xfdffd0ff irq 10 at device 16.4 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ehci0: [ITHREAD] usb4: EHCI version 1.0 usb4: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3 usb4: on ehci0 usb4: USB revision 2.0 uhub4: on usb4 uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered isab0: at device 17.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: at device 17.5 (no driver attached) acpi_tz0: on acpi0 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio0: [FILTER] sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A sio1: [FILTER] atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] atkbd0: [ITHREAD] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: [ITHREAD] psm0: model IntelliMouse Explorer, device ID 4 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcf7ff pnpid ORM0000 on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1500015037 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec ad0: 3919MB at ata0-master PIO4 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s2a re0: link state changed to UP re1: link state changed to UP fuse4bsd: version 0.3.9-pre1, FUSE ABI 7.8 --- It was only last week when I noticed that this version will not run very well on the other board type. Meanwhile I updated the machine to 7.2-stable, but it still comes around with lots of weird re-problems after a few hours of operation: --- Copyright (c) 1992-2009 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #0: Thu Aug 13 19:08:58 CEST 2009 root@xenon:/usr/tmp/usr/obj/usr/work/stable/src/sys/FIREFLY Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: VIA C7 Processor 1500MHz (1500.01-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "CentaurHauls" Id = 0x6d0 Stepping = 0 Features=0xa7c9baff Features2=0x4181 VIA Padlock Features=0xffcc real memory = 1055784960 (1006 MB) avail memory = 1023733760 (976 MB) kbd1 at kbdmux0 cryptosoft0: on motherboard padlock0: on motherboard acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: [ITHREAD] acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed acpi0: reservation of 100000, 3ede0000 (3) failed Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x408-0x40b on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci_link2: BIOS IRQ 5 for 0.9.INTA is invalid pci_link2: BIOS IRQ 5 for 0.16.INTC is invalid pci_link2: BIOS IRQ 5 for 0.17.INTC is invalid pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 vgapci0: mem 0xf4000000-0xf7ffffff,0xfb000000-0xfbffffff irq 11 at device 0.0 on pci1 re0: port 0xf000-0xf0ff mem 0xfdfff000-0xfdfff0ff irq 10 at device 9.0 on pci0 re0: Chip rev. 0x18000000 re0: MAC rev. 0x00000000 miibus0: on re0 rgephy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 rgephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto re0: Ethernet address: 00:30:18:ab:d0:19 re0: [FILTER] re1: port 0xf200-0xf2ff mem 0xfdffe000-0xfdffe0ff irq 10 at device 11.0 on pci0 re1: Chip rev. 0x18000000 re1: MAC rev. 0x00000000 miibus1: on re1 rgephy1: PHY 1 on miibus1 rgephy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto re1: Ethernet address: 00:30:18:ab:d0:1a re1: [FILTER] atapci0: port 0xff00-0xff07,0xfe00-0xfe03,0xfd00-0xfd07,0xfc00-0xfc03,0xfb00-0xfb0f,0xf400-0xf4ff irq 11 at device 15.0 on pci0 atapci0: [ITHREAD] ata2: on atapci0 ata2: [ITHREAD] ata3: on atapci0 ata3: [ITHREAD] atapci1: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xfa00-0xfa0f at device 15.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci1 ata0: [ITHREAD] ata1: on atapci1 ata1: [ITHREAD] uhci0: port 0xf900-0xf91f irq 11 at device 16.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci0: [ITHREAD] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: on usb0 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xf800-0xf81f irq 11 at device 16.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci1: [ITHREAD] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: on usb1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0xf700-0xf71f irq 11 at device 16.2 on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci2: [ITHREAD] usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: on usb2 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3: port 0xf600-0xf61f irq 11 at device 16.3 on pci0 uhci3: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci3: [ITHREAD] usb3: on uhci3 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: on usb3 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xfdffd000-0xfdffd0ff irq 10 at device 16.4 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ehci0: [ITHREAD] usb4: EHCI version 1.0 usb4: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3 usb4: on ehci0 usb4: USB revision 2.0 uhub4: on usb4 uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered isab0: at device 17.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: at device 17.5 (no driver attached) acpi_tz0: on acpi0 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio0: [FILTER] sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A sio1: [FILTER] atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] atkbd0: [ITHREAD] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: [ITHREAD] psm0: model IntelliMouse Explorer, device ID 4 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_perf0: on cpu0 acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcffff pnpid ORM0000 on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1500012699 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec ad0: 3919MB at ata0-master PIO4 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s2a re0: link state changed to UP re1: link state changed to UP fuse4bsd: version 0.3.9-pre1, FUSE ABI 7.8 re1: link state changed to DOWN re1: link state changed to UP re1: link state changed to DOWN re1: link state changed to UP re1: link state changed to DOWN re1: link state changed to UP re1: link state changed to DOWN re1: link state changed to UP re1: link state changed to DOWN re1: link state changed to UP re1: link state changed to DOWN re1: link state changed to UP re1: link state changed to DOWN re1: link state changed to UP re1: link state changed to DOWN re1: link state changed to UP re0: link state changed to DOWN re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) arplookup 192.32.96.115 failed: host is not on local network re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) re1: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967292 pkt len 4294967292) [...] --- It works for some time (typically not more than a few hours) and then goes nuts with some kind of networking problems. Apart from what I've shown above I have also seen complaints about "runt packages" (whatever this may be :-) and lots of other stuff. This seems to happen on both onboard interfaces, but not at the same time (after one has crashed, the other one sometimes still works). The crash goes along with dropping the link from 1000TX to 100TX. It won't come back to 1000TX. Turning off checksum-offloading and the other features does not help either. The interface is basically dead afterwards, even tcpdump won't see any package anymore. Simply rebooting does not remedy the problem either, you have to unplug the power to get networking back. Any hints? cu Gerrit From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 17 15:35:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B25106564A for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:35:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cowens@greatbaysoftware.com) Received: from portcityhosting.com (bayringfw.portcityweb.com [64.140.243.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DBBB8FC67 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:35:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([173.14.128.81]) by portcityhosting.com with MailEnable ESMTP; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:55:55 -0400 X-WatchGuard-Mail-Exception: Allow Message-ID: <4A897014.4020706@greatbaysoftware.com> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:58:28 -0400 From: Charles Owens MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------030006060007040302040401" X-WatchGuard-AntiVirus: part scanned. clean action=allow X-ME-Bayesian: 0.000000 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: READ_BIG w/DVD-pata motion? (kern/133122) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:35:54 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030006060007040302040401 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WatchGuard-AntiVirus: part scanned. clean action=allow Hello, Just under a month ago I added a comment to this bug, to share that we're seeing this issue consistently with one of the HP appliance platforms that we support (with both FreeBSD 7.0 and 7.1). This bug (marked as "serious") is still in the "open" state, with as yet no sign that anyone is working on it. Does anyone have a sense as to when it might be given a good look? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/133122 Thanks much, Charles -- **Charles Owens** *Great Bay Software***** --------------030006060007040302040401-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 17 16:58:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEC4106568B for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:58:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gavin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail-gw1.york.ac.uk (mail-gw1.york.ac.uk [144.32.128.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4533B8FC51 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:58:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gw7.york.ac.uk (mail-gw7.york.ac.uk [144.32.129.30]) by mail-gw1.york.ac.uk (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n7HGRUDw014096; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:27:30 +0100 (BST) Received: from buffy-128.york.ac.uk ([144.32.128.160] helo=buffy.york.ac.uk) by mail-gw7.york.ac.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Md53S-00026v-4A; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:27:30 +0100 Received: from buffy.york.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by buffy.york.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n7HGRTZM035480; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:27:29 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from gavin@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from ga9@localhost) by buffy.york.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n7HGRTGU035479; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:27:29 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from gavin@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: buffy.york.ac.uk: ga9 set sender to gavin@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Gavin Atkinson To: Charles Owens In-Reply-To: <4A897014.4020706@greatbaysoftware.com> References: <4A897014.4020706@greatbaysoftware.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:27:29 +0100 Message-Id: <1250526449.32945.37.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-York-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-York-MailScanner-From: gavin@freebsd.org Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: READ_BIG w/DVD-pata motion? (kern/133122) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:58:54 -0000 On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 10:58 -0400, Charles Owens wrote: > Just under a month ago I added a comment to this bug, to share that > we're seeing this issue consistently with one of the HP appliance > platforms that we support (with both FreeBSD 7.0 and 7.1). This bug > (marked as "serious") is still in the "open" state, with as yet no > sign > that anyone is working on it. Does anyone have a sense as to when it > might be given a good look? A few bits of information are missing from that PR, it would be useful if you could add the following to it: - A full verbose dmesg - two outputs of "vmstat -i", say 10 seconds apart, both before and after the problems start. FWIW, I'm not convinced that your problem is the same as the submitter's problem - he's complaining only on issues when he hits the last block of the CD, and you're having problems with slow reads throughout the whole CD. If you're not using a "JMicron JMB363 SATA300 controller" it's likely your issue is different to kern/133122 and it would be worth creating a new PR with a full description of exactly what symptoms you see, and the above information. Gavin From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 17 18:19:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E12106568E for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:19:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cowens@greatbaysoftware.com) Received: from portcityhosting.com (bayringfw.portcityweb.com [64.140.243.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62458FC3D for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([173.14.128.81]) by portcityhosting.com with MailEnable ESMTP; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:19:47 -0400 X-WatchGuard-Mail-Exception: Allow Message-ID: <4A899FDC.1070709@greatbaysoftware.com> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:22:20 -0400 From: Charles Owens MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gavin Atkinson References: <4A897014.4020706@greatbaysoftware.com> <1250526449.32945.37.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <1250526449.32945.37.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080304040604050806070309" X-WatchGuard-AntiVirus: part scanned. clean action=allow X-ME-Bayesian: 0.000000 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: READ_BIG w/DVD-pata motion? (kern/133122) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:19:48 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080304040604050806070309 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WatchGuard-AntiVirus: part scanned. clean action=allow Gavin Atkinson wrote: > On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 10:58 -0400, Charles Owens wrote: > >> Just under a month ago I added a comment to this bug, to share that >> we're seeing this issue consistently with one of the HP appliance >> platforms that we support (with both FreeBSD 7.0 and 7.1). This bug >> (marked as "serious") is still in the "open" state, with as yet no >> sign >> that anyone is working on it. Does anyone have a sense as to when it >> might be given a good look? >> > > A few bits of information are missing from that PR, it would be useful > if you could add the following to it: > > - A full verbose dmesg > - two outputs of "vmstat -i", say 10 seconds apart, both before and > after the problems start. > > FWIW, I'm not convinced that your problem is the same as the submitter's > problem - he's complaining only on issues when he hits the last block of > the CD, and you're having problems with slow reads throughout the whole > CD. If you're not using a "JMicron JMB363 SATA300 controller" it's > likely your issue is different to kern/133122 and it would be worth > creating a new PR with a full description of exactly what symptoms you > see, and the above information. > > Gavin > Thanks... we'll work on submitting a new PR as you've suggested. Charles --------------080304040604050806070309-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 17 20:01:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA141065690 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:01:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD5C8FC52 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Md8Op-0005Py-6B for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:01:47 -0700 Message-ID: <25013231.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:01:47 -0700 (PDT) From: FreeBSD User To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <24995981.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: freebsdtemp@mailinator.com References: <24995981.post@talk.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Netowrk Card BCE not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:01:48 -0000 We are having the same issue on 8.0-BETA2 with a Dell R610. Google shows users with Dell M610 (blade server), and T610 (tower server) models having this problem as well. Please fix for 7.2-RELEASE and patch in time for 8.0-RELEASE! Umar wrote: > > Dear Members! > > I have recently Install FreeBSD 7.2 amd64 on DELL R610. > > After successfuly installation network cards are not working and i got > error > > bce0: /usr/src/dev/bce/if_bce.c(1386): Unable to write CTX memory: > cid_addr = 0x0000008, offset = 0x00000080 > > Would you please help me what should I do? > > Regards, > > Umar > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Netowrk-Card-BCE-not-working-tp24995981p25013231.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 17 21:58:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C58106568C for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from mailgw.es.net (mail2.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:107:1::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF0B8FC16 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:58:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:910::29]) by mailgw.es.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n7HLw0fP022893 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:58:01 -0700 Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id C7F191CC09; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:58:00 -0700 (PDT) To: Bartosz Stec In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:18:11 +0200." <4A890433.1070809@kkip.pl> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:58:00 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20090817215800.C7F191CC09@ptavv.es.net> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2009-08-17_13:2009-08-11, 2009-08-17, 2009-08-17 signatures=0 Cc: Dan Allen , Johan Hendriks , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Going to BSD 8 from RELENG_7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:58:10 -0000 > Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:18:11 +0200 > From: Bartosz Stec > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > Johan Hendriks pisze: > > Be aware that if you go from 7 to 8 you will need to rebuild all your > > installed ports. > > ALso if you do a buildworld from 7 to 8 do not do the make delete-old > > and the make delete-old-libs before you have rebuild your ports. > > If you do the make delete-old and make delete-old-libs runs, all ports > > depending on the FreeBSD 7 libs will not work any more. << read: most > > likely all your ports. > > If you have changed for example your Shell for root to a ports based > > shell like bash and you do the make delete-old-libs you can not log in > > anymore, because bash depends on the 7 libs wich are not there anymore. > > > > And as usual MAKE A GOOD BACKUP !!!! > > > > Regards, > > Johan > > > > > > > As I remember when I did upgrade from FreBSD 6.4 to 7.0, I ran > 'portupgrade -afi' after thar, BUT as I remember all my ports in fact > works before they were upgraded. If I understand correctly, the reason > of this was not making delete-old and delete-old-libs? > > So should following upgrade procedure be painless? > > 0. Backup! > 1. cvsup 8.0-stable > 2. make buildworld && make buildkernel > 3. make installkernel > 4. reboot and jump to single user mode > 5. make installworld && mergemastger > 6. take a deep breath & reboot > 7. portupgrade -afi > 8. make delete-old && make delete-old-libs > 9. reboot > 10. Hooray! > > My concern is - will my ports works after point 6. ? Quite important > thing when machine can't be offline by hours during portupgrade -afi .... You can compress 2 and 3 into: make buildworld && make kernel. To save a LOT of time on SMP systems, use -jN where N is at least (numcpus + 1). IF you get an error with -j, build again without '-jN' and with '-DNO_CLEAN" to quickly find the real error. Do a delete-old. Hold off on delete-old-libs for a bit. (It's generally the old header files which bite, but keeping libs is "safe".) The problem is that, when you start updating ports, you will eventually (and probably pretty quickly) end up with a port that links to two libraries which, in turn, link to a "common" library, but one links to the old and one to the new. When this happens, the real-time loader (rtld) will object strongly and one or more ports are rendered un-runnable. libmap.conf(5) can usually be used as a temporary way to get things working again, but it does not always work. Version numbers are only bumped because there is a reason (I hope). I suggest that you install packages (-P) for any ports that are not using special options. It can save hours of time. Also, use script or something else to keep a copy of the output of the portupgrade. It can be very handy in fixing any problems that crop up. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 18 16:55:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10819106568B for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:55:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manishv@lineratesystems.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f180.google.com (mail-vw0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24EE8FC45 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:55:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws10 with SMTP id 10so3226369vws.7 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:55:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.12.73 with SMTP id w9mr7276562vcw.71.1250613237060; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:33:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5bc218350908171524m5a46c3dbm3e6af625c51370d0@mail.gmail.com> References: <5bc218350908171524m5a46c3dbm3e6af625c51370d0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:33:57 -0600 Message-ID: <5bc218350908180933q22e7dc22s835fd54f35ca764b@mail.gmail.com> From: Manish Vachharajani To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Dropped vs. missed packets in the ixgbe driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:55:50 -0000 I've been doing some performance testing on freebsd 7.2 and noticed that the ixgbe driver does not report missed packets as dropped when queried via netstat -id (the ixgbe driver in the 8.0 =A0beta has a similar issue). =A0A missed packet is a packet that was correctly received by the NIC but because it was out of descriptors and internal memory, the packet had to be dropped by the NIC itself -- a hardware register counts such events. =A0Instead the driver only reports drops that are due to the driver itself, i.e., the NIC DMAed the packet to memory but the driver had to drop something because it was out of mbufs. =A0Is the miss count reported elsewhere (besides via a kernel printf from the driver)? =A0At the end of the email I give a stats dump from the driver and from netstat, note the number of packets dropped is 0 as reported by netstat but the Missed field in the dmesg output shows many missed packets. >From my perspective, it is disconcerting to see performance degradation on the link, along with TCP ack retransmits, packet reordering, etc. (on a point-to-point link with no switch in between) but then see no drops reported by netstat because the driver didn't drop the packet, the NIC did. =A0The fix should be straight-forward and I'll gladly make a patch assuming that it is indeed a bug and not a conscious design choice. Here is the relevant netstat output Name =A0 =A0Mtu Network =A0 =A0 =A0 Address =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Ipkt= s Ierrs =A0 =A0Opkts Oerrs =A0Coll Drop ix0 =A0 =A01500 =A0 =A0 =A000:30:48:94:60:ec =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00 =A0 = =A0 0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A01 =A00 =A0 =A0 0 =A0 =A00 ix0 =A0 =A01500 192.168.105.0 192.168.105.2 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00 =A0 = =A0 - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00 =A0- =A0 =A0 - =A0 =A0- ix1 =A0 =A01500 =A0 =A0 =A000:30:48:94:60:ed =A0 =A0 =A011M =A0 = =A0 0 =A0 =A0 6.1M =A00 =A0 =A0 0 =A0 =A00 ix1 =A0 =A01500 192.168.5.0 =A0 192.168.5.2 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A010M =A0 = =A0 - =A0 =A0 6.1M =A0- =A0 =A0 - =A0 =A0- And here is the dmesg output after doing a sysctl dev.ix.1.stats=3D1 ix1: Std Mbuf Failed =3D 0 ix1: Missed Packets =3D 413872 ix1: Receive length errors =3D 0 ix1: Crc errors =3D 0 ix1: Driver dropped packets =3D 0 ix1: watchdog timeouts =3D 0 ix1: XON Rcvd =3D 616428212235 ix1: XON Xmtd =3D 0 ix1: XOFF Rcvd =3D 616428212235 ix1: XOFF Xmtd =3D 0 ix1: Total Packets Rcvd =3D 12424533 ix1: Good Packets Rcvd =3D 12010661 ix1: Good Packets Xmtd =3D 6419128 ix1: TSO Transmissions =3D 0 Manish -- Manish Vachharajani manishv@lineratesystems.com From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 19 10:20:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91858106568C for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:20:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@dino.sk) Received: from loki.netlab.sk (ns3.netlab.sk [84.245.65.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED358FC51 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:20:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from via.dino.sk (fw1.dino.sk [84.245.95.252]) (AUTH: PLAIN milan, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by loki.netlab.sk with esmtp; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:19:13 +0200 id 0002E00F.4A8BD1A1.00012CA4 From: Milan Obuch To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:20:13 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200908191220.13678.freebsd-stable@dino.sk> Subject: ntpdate with u3g - synchronisation problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:20:27 -0000 Hi, I have a box connected via u3g (Huawei E169) running OpenVPN with PKI certificates. It needs to synchronise time. I added ntpdate_enable="YES" ntpdate_flags="-b " into rc.conf. Problem is, ntpdate timeouts, because network starts slowly in this case. I need ntpdate to wait somehow until ntp server is reachable. Due to USB used to connect 3G modem, ppp is started via devd event. Network start is a bit asynchronous, not ordered in rcorder sense. Could someone shed some lite on this for me? It looks a bit like synchronous DHCP - at least I think so. Any help appreciated. Regards, Milan From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 19 11:19:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55E4106568C for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:19:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CCD8FC43 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n7JBGXPg003802; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:16:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <200908191116.n7JBGXPg003802@lava.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:19:42 -0400 To: Milan Obuch , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <200908191220.13678.freebsd-stable@dino.sk> References: <200908191220.13678.freebsd-stable@dino.sk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: ntpdate with u3g - synchronisation problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:19:48 -0000 At 06:20 AM 8/19/2009, Milan Obuch wrote: >Hi, > >I have a box connected via u3g (Huawei E169) running OpenVPN with PKI >certificates. It needs to synchronise time. I added Better to fire it when the ppp link actually comes up. This could be well after the machine boots since you might not immediately have signal. If your ppp label is called gprs for example, in /etc/ppp/ppp.linkup add gprs: ! /usr/sbin/ntpdate -s ---Mike >ntpdate_enable="YES" >ntpdate_flags="-b " > >into rc.conf. Problem is, ntpdate timeouts, because network starts slowly in >this case. I need ntpdate to wait somehow until ntp server is reachable. Due >to USB used to connect 3G modem, ppp is started via devd event. Network start >is a bit asynchronous, not ordered in rcorder sense. > >Could someone shed some lite on this for me? It looks a bit like synchronous >DHCP - at least I think so. > >Any help appreciated. > >Regards, >Milan >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 19 23:15:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8280106568D; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:15:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688298FC16; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n7JNF5eY012807; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:15:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: (from tinderbox@localhost) by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n7JNF5Rq012803; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:15:05 GMT (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:15:05 GMT Message-Id: <200908192315.n7JNF5Rq012803@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> X-Authentication-Warning: freebsd-current.sentex.ca: tinderbox set sender to FreeBSD Tinderbox using -f Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Cc: Subject: [releng_8 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:15:36 -0000 TB --- 2009-08-19 23:15:04 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2009-08-19 23:15:04 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2009-08-19 23:15:04 - mkdir /tinderbox/RELENG_8 TB --- 2009-08-19 23:15:04 - ERROR: /tinderbox/RELENG_8/amd64/amd64: File exists TB --- 2009-08-19 23:15:04 - 0.02 user 0.01 system 0.04 real http://tinderbox.des.no/tinderbox-releng_8-RELENG_8-amd64-amd64.full From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 20 02:34:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE96106568D for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:34:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF16C8FC45 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (inchoate.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7K2YS9a033059 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:04:29 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:04:13 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5065802.6FKKfXtbGd"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908201204.24914.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -3.6 () ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 203.31.81.10 Subject: Blocked process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:34:32 -0000 --nextPart5065802.6FKKfXtbGd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, We have several systems doing data acquisition and I had originally=20 thought we were seeing the interrupt handler for out PCI card not being=20 called quickly enough, however I misread the diagnostics :) The digitised data is fed into a FIFO and when it is part full=20 (32kbytes) an interrupt is generated. The IRQ routine reads 32kbyte=20 chunks into a kernel buffer (4Mbyte) until part full goes away. If the=20 =46IFO full flag is seen (it is latched by the hardware) then acquisition=20 is halted. The problem appears to now be that the userland process that reads data=20 out of the kernel is being stalled for over 4 seconds. This process=20 reads from the kernel and does some minor processing and then writes it=20 out to a child process to do some more work on it. I ran 'ps -xaulwww' in a loop every second to see what ELSE was using=20 the CPU when it was stalled and found that my script stalled for 7=20 seconds. I tried increasing the buffer inside the kernel (to 8Mb) which seemed to=20 have no effect, however renice'ing the process from -5 to -20 has=20 greatly reduced the frequency of occurrence. WRT the buffer size - I=20 would expect that if I increased it more it would reduce the problem=20 but since I have only increased it to ~4 seconds worth and the stall is=20 longer I see no effect. Given that renice'ing has an effect it seems to be a scheduler problem,=20 I don't see how it can be something to do with the motherboard stalling=20 the whole system otherwise the FIFO full error would occur, however I=20 only see the 4Mb kernel buffer filling up. One other possibility would be something holding a lock for too long=20 that blocks both the DAQ readout process and ps, however I am not sure=20 how I would find out what. Unfortunately the system is in Finland and I'm in Australia so I can't=20 sit at the console :( I am hoping to be able to replicate the HW & SW locally at some stage=20 but haven't been able to yet. Any help appreciated, thanks! =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart5065802.6FKKfXtbGd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBKjLYw5ZPcIHs/zowRAqa7AJ9W8IABIKjqB7Owy1Bn3n3d3H5rzACfS93E 1rl/XRZzeFggAjs0MhDFCLw= =hOG1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5065802.6FKKfXtbGd-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 20 07:04:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00BD0106568B for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:04:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from mx0.gid.co.uk (mx0.gid.co.uk [194.32.164.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A018FC16 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:04:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gidgate.gid.co.uk (80-46-130-69.static.dsl.as9105.com [80.46.130.69]) by mx0.gid.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n7K6h76B073005; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:43:08 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.0.240] (host-84-9-193-12.dslgb.com [84.9.12.193] (may be forged)) by gidgate.gid.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7K6h0sL068602; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:43:00 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Message-Id: <1C09D3DE-5DA2-4AC6-B546-DA8E6715E1F4@gid.co.uk> From: Bob Bishop To: "Daniel O'Connor" In-Reply-To: <200908201204.24914.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:42:55 +0100 References: <200908201204.24914.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blocked process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:04:26 -0000 Hi, On 20 Aug 2009, at 03:34, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > [...] > The problem appears to now be that the userland process that reads > data > out of the kernel is being stalled for over 4 seconds. This process > reads from the kernel and does some minor processing and then writes > it > out to a child process to do some more work on it. > > [...] > Given that renice'ing has an effect it seems to be a scheduler > problem, [etc] Which scheduler are you using? Have you tried the other one? -- Bob Bishop rb@gid.co.uk From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 20 07:25:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E00106568E for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:25:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8AB8FC69 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:25:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (inchoate.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7K7PD68040548 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:55:13 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Bob Bishop Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:55:00 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <200908201204.24914.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <1C09D3DE-5DA2-4AC6-B546-DA8E6715E1F4@gid.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1C09D3DE-5DA2-4AC6-B546-DA8E6715E1F4@gid.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1632803.zyBB5vPTYh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908201655.08711.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -3.599 () ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blocked process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:25:17 -0000 --nextPart1632803.zyBB5vPTYh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Bob Bishop wrote: > Hi, > > On 20 Aug 2009, at 03:34, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > [...] > > The problem appears to now be that the userland process that reads > > data > > out of the kernel is being stalled for over 4 seconds. This process > > reads from the kernel and does some minor processing and then > > writes it > > out to a child process to do some more work on it. > > > > [...] > > Given that renice'ing has an effect it seems to be a scheduler > > problem, [etc] > > Which scheduler are you using? Have you tried the other one? This is running in 6.2 ish using 4BSD, I was under the impression ULE=20 wasn't very stable in 6.2. I could probably try it though... =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1632803.zyBB5vPTYh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBKjPpU5ZPcIHs/zowRAjHIAKCrKB2g3skAaST4GWD/yT836VuhZgCdHqKR o+OaEFE4HRwhs/8H5LtmYVw= =AfFw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1632803.zyBB5vPTYh-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 20 07:47:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E59106568B for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:47:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from mx0.gid.co.uk (mx0.gid.co.uk [194.32.164.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCF58FC43 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gidgate.gid.co.uk (80-46-130-69.static.dsl.as9105.com [80.46.130.69]) by mx0.gid.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n7K7lHhp074270; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:47:17 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.0.240] (host-84-9-193-12.dslgb.com [84.9.12.193] (may be forged)) by gidgate.gid.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7K7lCtj069031; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:47:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Message-Id: <5A8B04B7-6110-4D00-8727-3311DC935019@gid.co.uk> From: Bob Bishop To: "Daniel O'Connor" In-Reply-To: <200908201655.08711.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:47:07 +0100 References: <200908201204.24914.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <1C09D3DE-5DA2-4AC6-B546-DA8E6715E1F4@gid.co.uk> <200908201655.08711.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blocked process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:47:20 -0000 On 20 Aug 2009, at 08:25, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > This is running in 6.2 ish using 4BSD, I was under the impression ULE > wasn't very stable in 6.2. > > I could probably try it though... Hmm. ISTR having similar problems around the 6.1-2 era. You might try 6.4 if that's possible for you. -- Bob Bishop rb@gid.co.uk From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 20 09:50:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C168106568E for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:50:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45678FC3D for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (ppp121-45-173-89.lns11.adl2.internode.on.net [121.45.173.89]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7K9oBYQ044510 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:20:11 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Bob Bishop Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:19:56 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <200908201204.24914.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200908201655.08711.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <5A8B04B7-6110-4D00-8727-3311DC935019@gid.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <5A8B04B7-6110-4D00-8727-3311DC935019@gid.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1756453.1xXVXFvMs9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908201920.06795.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -1.509 () AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blocked process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:50:14 -0000 --nextPart1756453.1xXVXFvMs9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Bob Bishop wrote: > On 20 Aug 2009, at 08:25, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > This is running in 6.2 ish using 4BSD, I was under the impression > > ULE wasn't very stable in 6.2. > > > > I could probably try it though... > > Hmm. ISTR having similar problems around the 6.1-2 era. You might try > 6.4 if that's possible for you. Someone is going to visit it, but if I can't solve it remotely I'll=20 probably just update it to 7.2 or so. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1756453.1xXVXFvMs9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBKjRxO5ZPcIHs/zowRAgWZAJwJQ0JWOqAMiI3yBR0nnMlEdP3BoQCeKcc2 qzCn6riUnHcIZXcRBzwUUMA= =i+Tb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1756453.1xXVXFvMs9-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 20 10:18:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CF31065672 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:18:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jespasac@minibofh.org) Received: from xen-smtp03.cdmon.com (smtp03.cdmon.com [212.36.74.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4D88FC57 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jespasac.cdmon.com (249.Red-88-2-209.staticIP.rima-tde.net [88.2.209.249]) by xen-smtp03.cdmon.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BF3BFC04B4 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:06:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4A8D2169.9050500@minibofh.org> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:11:53 +0200 From: Jordi Espasa Clofent User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: nscd in 6.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:18:26 -0000 Hi all, I want to implement nscd in a lot of servers which has diferents releseases of 6.x and 7.x branches. No problem with 7.x branches: nscd seems part of the system now: # whereis nscd && uname -r nscd: /usr/sbin/nscd /usr/share/man/man8/nscd.8.gz /usr/src/usr.sbin/nscd 7.0-RELEASE-p4 But not appears in 6.2: # whereis nscd && uname -r nscd: 6.2-RELEASE-p11 or 6.3 # whereis nscd && uname -r nscd: 6.3-RELEASE-p3 Moreover I've updated the src of one 6.3 to see if this it was included in 6.4 sources but also it's not there: # grep nscd /usr/src/sbin/ ¿Can I use nscd in 6.x branch? ¿Is there some 'alternative'? I've read about "cached" but I don't find anywhere in 6.3 (for example); the only one reference I've found is the port /usr/ports/databases/memcached, but I think it's not nscd-related at all. -- Thanks, Jordi Espasa Clofent From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 20 11:06:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F42106568E for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:06:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7CF8FC6B for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:06:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (ppp121-45-173-89.lns11.adl2.internode.on.net [121.45.173.89]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7KB6O9R046294 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:36:24 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Bob Bishop Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:36:10 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <200908201204.24914.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <5A8B04B7-6110-4D00-8727-3311DC935019@gid.co.uk> <200908201920.06795.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200908201920.06795.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2832017.rAQBnN6YdI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908202036.20367.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -1.513 () AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blocked process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:06:27 -0000 --nextPart2832017.rAQBnN6YdI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Bob Bishop wrote: > > On 20 Aug 2009, at 08:25, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > > This is running in 6.2 ish using 4BSD, I was under the impression > > > ULE wasn't very stable in 6.2. > > > > > > I could probably try it though... > > > > Hmm. ISTR having similar problems around the 6.1-2 era. You might > > try 6.4 if that's possible for you. > > Someone is going to visit it, but if I can't solve it remotely I'll > probably just update it to 7.2 or so. What sort of problems did you have BTW? =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart2832017.rAQBnN6YdI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBKjS4s5ZPcIHs/zowRAgDJAJoC0gEektWtfsz+NC44PaIxGBIulQCfZCxK KRjwIHocaIwsC8vmLNYE8k0= =G7bm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2832017.rAQBnN6YdI-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 20 11:35:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFE4106568E for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:35:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from mx0.gid.co.uk (mx0.gid.co.uk [194.32.164.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB268FC73 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:35:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gidgate.gid.co.uk (80-46-130-69.static.dsl.as9105.com [80.46.130.69]) by mx0.gid.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n7KBZvUH078437; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:35:57 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.0.240] (host-84-9-193-12.dslgb.com [84.9.12.193] (may be forged)) by gidgate.gid.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7KBZqoO070843; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:35:52 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Message-Id: From: Bob Bishop To: "Daniel O'Connor" In-Reply-To: <200908202036.20367.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:35:46 +0100 References: <200908201204.24914.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <5A8B04B7-6110-4D00-8727-3311DC935019@gid.co.uk> <200908201920.06795.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200908202036.20367.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blocked process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:35:59 -0000 On 20 Aug 2009, at 12:06, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Daniel O'Connor wrote: >> On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Bob Bishop wrote: >>> On 20 Aug 2009, at 08:25, Daniel O'Connor wrote: >>>> This is running in 6.2 ish using 4BSD, I was under the impression >>>> ULE wasn't very stable in 6.2. >>>> >>>> I could probably try it though... >>> >>> Hmm. ISTR having similar problems around the 6.1-2 era. You might >>> try 6.4 if that's possible for you. >> >> Someone is going to visit it, but if I can't solve it remotely I'll >> probably just update it to 7.2 or so. > > What sort of problems did you have BTW? Things like ls on the console might take several seconds to respond when the box didn't seem to be very busy (but wasn't idle, maybe serving a little NFS). It wasn't the shell getting swapped out or anything else obvious. This was on SMP, not using X. The problem went away with 6.4R (had to stay with 6.x for unrelated reasons). -- Bob Bishop rb@gid.co.uk From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 20 11:48:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0CF106568B for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:48:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from mail.zoral.com.ua (skuns.zoral.com.ua [91.193.166.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0CA8FC89 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:48:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by mail.zoral.com.ua (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n7KBme0p036920 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:48:41 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n7KBmb1B046535; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:48:40 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n7KBm7Mm046532; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:48:07 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:48:07 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov To: Bob Bishop Message-ID: <20090820114807.GQ9623@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <200908201204.24914.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <5A8B04B7-6110-4D00-8727-3311DC935019@gid.co.uk> <200908201920.06795.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200908202036.20367.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8jcWiON1L7A8HfS7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blocked process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:48:46 -0000 --8jcWiON1L7A8HfS7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:35:46PM +0100, Bob Bishop wrote: >=20 > On 20 Aug 2009, at 12:06, Daniel O'Connor wrote: >=20 > >On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > >>On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Bob Bishop wrote: > >>>On 20 Aug 2009, at 08:25, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > >>>>This is running in 6.2 ish using 4BSD, I was under the impression > >>>>ULE wasn't very stable in 6.2. > >>>> > >>>>I could probably try it though... > >>> > >>>Hmm. ISTR having similar problems around the 6.1-2 era. You might > >>>try 6.4 if that's possible for you. > >> > >>Someone is going to visit it, but if I can't solve it remotely I'll > >>probably just update it to 7.2 or so. > > > >What sort of problems did you have BTW? >=20 > Things like ls on the console might take several seconds to respond =20 > when the box didn't seem to be very busy (but wasn't idle, maybe =20 > serving a little NFS). It wasn't the shell getting swapped out or =20 > anything else obvious. This was on SMP, not using X. The problem went =20 > away with 6.4R (had to stay with 6.x for unrelated reasons). 6.1 was released with a bug in NFS server, causing serious slowdown when non-MPSAFE fs was exported. --8jcWiON1L7A8HfS7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqNN/cACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4gvkwCg78bEGfbIvylL00sJB1TIiF6S ewcAoITXJH/E5gMvTJMJHN3q8SplUN2I =EA18 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8jcWiON1L7A8HfS7-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 20 11:51:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A8F106568B for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:51:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from mail-gw1.york.ac.uk (mail-gw1.york.ac.uk [144.32.128.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD568FC6F for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:51:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gw6.york.ac.uk (mail-gw6.york.ac.uk [144.32.129.26]) by mail-gw1.york.ac.uk (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n7KBpXE1018259; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:51:33 +0100 (BST) Received: from buffy-128.york.ac.uk ([144.32.128.160] helo=buffy.york.ac.uk) by mail-gw6.york.ac.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Me6B3-0007AA-83; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:51:33 +0100 Received: from buffy.york.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by buffy.york.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n7KBpWRp069471; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:51:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: (from ga9@localhost) by buffy.york.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n7KBpWA4069470; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:51:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: buffy.york.ac.uk: ga9 set sender to gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk using -f From: Gavin Atkinson To: Jordi Espasa Clofent In-Reply-To: <4A8D2169.9050500@minibofh.org> References: <4A8D2169.9050500@minibofh.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:51:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1250769092.68602.5.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-York-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-York-MailScanner-From: gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nscd in 6.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:51:38 -0000 On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 12:11 +0200, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: > # whereis nscd && uname -r > nscd: > 6.3-RELEASE-p3 >=20 > Moreover I've updated the src of one 6.3 to see if this it was included=20 > in 6.4 sources but also it's not there: > # grep nscd /usr/src/sbin/ >=20 > =BFCan I use nscd in 6.x branch? =BFIs there some 'alternative'? I've rea= d=20 > about "cached" but I don't find anywhere in 6.3 (for example); the only=20 > one reference I've found is the port /usr/ports/databases/memcached, but=20 > I think it's not nscd-related at all. "cached" was the original name for the nscd implementation in 7.x, it was renamed before 7.0 was released. You may be able to backport it from 7.x to 6.x, I have no idea how easy this would be though. Gavin From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 20 12:42:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809E1106568B for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:42:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7EB98FC64 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:42:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (ppp121-45-173-89.lns11.adl2.internode.on.net [121.45.173.89]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7KCgOVb049061 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:12:24 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Kostik Belousov Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:12:20 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <200908201204.24914.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20090820114807.GQ9623@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20090820114807.GQ9623@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1417129.K1UdWuLWqV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908202212.22831.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -1.518 () AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blocked process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:42:27 -0000 --nextPart1417129.K1UdWuLWqV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > Things like ls on the console might take several seconds to respond > > when the box didn't seem to be very busy (but wasn't idle, maybe > > serving a little NFS). It wasn't the shell getting swapped out or > > anything else obvious. This was on SMP, not using X. The problem > > went away with 6.4R (had to stay with 6.x for unrelated reasons). > > 6.1 was released with a bug in NFS server, causing serious slowdown > when non-MPSAFE fs was exported. Hmmm.. this is 6.2 (and a half) so I guess that's not my problem. Next! ;) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1417129.K1UdWuLWqV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBKjUSu5ZPcIHs/zowRAmZyAJ9qcGfukK916aZogpZdKtO8o6KUuQCgmuGD uxoErC5nkshHVCRc8GGWzPo= =MAJ8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1417129.K1UdWuLWqV-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 20 16:08:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805EC106568F for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:08:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ambrisko@ambrisko.com) Received: from mail.ambrisko.com (mail.ambrisko.com [64.174.51.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C83E8FC52 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:08:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Ambrisko-Me: Yes Received: from server2.ambrisko.com (HELO www.ambrisko.com) ([192.168.1.2]) by ironport.ambrisko.com with ESMTP; 20 Aug 2009 08:41:05 -0700 Received: from ambrisko.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.ambrisko.com (8.14.3/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n7KFdpo8004948; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:39:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ambrisko@ambrisko.com) Received: (from ambrisko@localhost) by ambrisko.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n7KFdpjJ004947; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:39:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ambrisko) From: Doug Ambrisko Message-Id: <200908201539.n7KFdpjJ004947@ambrisko.com> In-Reply-To: <24995981.post@talk.nabble.com> To: Umar Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:39:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL94b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Netowrk Card BCE not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:08:02 -0000 Umar writes: | Dear Members! | | I have recently Install FreeBSD 7.2 amd64 on DELL R610. | | After successfuly installation network cards are not working and i got error | | bce0: /usr/src/dev/bce/if_bce.c(1386): Unable to write CTX memory: cid_addr = 0x0000008, offset = 0x00000080 | | Would you please help me what should I do? A new version of firmware should be coming out from Dell that should resolve this issue. The firmware can be updated via DOS or Linux but not from FreeBSD using Linux emulation (atleast not yet) :-( A short time solution is to find a diag utility for the NIC and then disable management function in all NICs. Doug A. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 20 23:26:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528831065690 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:26:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LukeD@pobox.com) Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com [208.72.237.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199448FC55 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:26:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610731279F; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:25:59 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=date:from :reply-to:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type; s=sasl; bh=ToybqwpkMPmgWwWa9v5ti527g w4=; b=Komuw6uqAdyjg9wwAu8JzPVjJP/Y5s2dp2YDtBbexb/extq+XEWbqLjjr KyVEjwrIY6fKgdXe4NFiCwtY8tvUAyOGOXE/KVy0YSYPvt1Q/SGJLc3DophA19u1 dGIIMMKpr9v3gbIQiz4JSlRjE9wHLqeUeQOuoXnLaiT5s5QFtA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=date:from :reply-to:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=lem3D7WZCYE/vYblevq e7I09lxnUux8yaiusMmLTiQAnvuXbyD3ydamnXmsTIZTLDLbo7ht7ZmpECuyLN32 WM66x6jwWGvSjKFvOjAnUUk3/SOVsU6EwoAAbSMO4OGTC8oAKFGSfaTnLA8flI+0 SNOMa9+f7FMyzIs5DzbSm97s= Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2241279D; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:25:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lukas.is-a-geek.org (unknown [71.112.210.71]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A4E312797; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:25:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:25:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Luke Dean X-X-Sender: lukas@border.lukas.is-a-geek.org To: Luke Dean In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D0CAA3FE-8DE0-11DE-8CEF-CA0F1FFB4A78-96347044!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB mouse not detected on boot of 7-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Luke Dean List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:26:01 -0000 On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Luke Dean wrote: > > > On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Warren Block wrote: > >> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Luke Dean wrote: >> >>> >>> I'm tracking 7-STABLE. >>> Recently.. within the last month or so.. my simple USB mouse stopped >>> being detected at boot time. >>> The /dev/ums0 device simply does not appear unless I unplug the mouse >>> and plug it back in again. Then it is detected. >>> >>> I don't even know where to begin looking for answers to this one. >>> >>> Is there something I can do to force the system to rescan for my mouse >>> to save me from crawling around on the floor whenever I reboot? >> >> Do you have "Legacy USB support" enabled in the BIOS? If so, try turning >> it off. > > I tried it both ways. > I get some "waiting for BIOS to give up control" messages for some of my > /dev/usb devices in the dmesg now too, even with legacy USB support > disabled in the BIOS. > Thanks for the suggestions. Maybe I'll try upgrading to 8 soon. > Replying to myself... Upgrading to 8 fixed the problem. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 20 23:56:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0E5106568F for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:56:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from mailgw.es.net (mail2.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:107:1::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25EAB8FC3F for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:910::29]) by mailgw.es.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n7KNuq8F022935 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:56:52 -0700 Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id EFE271CC09 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:56:51 -0700 (PDT) To: stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:56:51 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20090820235651.EFE271CC09@ptavv.es.net> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2009-08-21_01:2009-08-11, 2009-08-21, 2009-08-20 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0907200000 definitions=main-0908200121 Cc: Subject: livelocks and deadlocks on 8.0BETA2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:56:53 -0000 I have a quad-core system that I updated to 8.0 about 2 weeks ago. It ran fine until yesterday when I used the PATA/ATAPI DVD drive to read a disk. Then the fun began. I saw two totally different presentations, but I hope that they both are manifestations of the same problem. First, the livelock. When attempting to play video off of the disk (xine or mplayer) while the CPU was busy, xorg would lock up solid. All CPUs were running a threaded code that run them all at 100%, but they were running niced to 10. Couldn't kill xorg, even with a 'kill -9'. Ate 100% of a CPU, though the CPU it was running on changed periodically. Could not switch to vty. The display was frozen and I could do nothing from the console. I could log in from another system and the system behaved normally. While I could not free the console, I could and did manage to shut down the system and reboot. This happened repeatedly and within a few seconds of starting the video playing. Now the deadlock. This one is weird in one instance. I had finished with a disk and unmounted it. No problems. Then I ejected the unmounted disk. (Yes, df(1) did not show it.) After the disk ejected, the system deadlocked. Frozen completely. Could not even ping it on the net, so it was in the kernel. I had no luck doing anything, so I had to kill power. Then it got worse. The second time this happened, I inserted an erased DVD while the system was in POST. The system started to boot, but, shortly after probing acd0, while the boot was "waiting for: usbus7 usbus6 usbus5 usbus4 usbus3 usbus2 usbus1 usbus0", and about the time it should have probed for cd0 (atapicam), the system locked up and would not finish the boot. This is prior to mounting root. After several repeats of this, I ejected the disk from the drive and it booted just fine. Clearly something with ATAPI is not happy. Should I not be using atapicam with 8.0? I won't have access to this system until next Tuesday and the time I have to tinker will be limited, but I can try setting up to break into the debugger (if the system is even seeing the keyboard) or do something else to get an idea of what is going on. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 21 02:41:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9A4106568E for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:41:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jason.harmening@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f206.google.com (mail-bw0-f206.google.com [209.85.218.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479E68FC6D for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so242660bwz.43 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:41:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W/XYso6A47KXxBPa+F2Q0GfQPzV3e76BDwPXmaASniM=; b=ML9b8+5YZ6cS+HMBZsBxzboj3QqMfl0dCI6N0locI76sD65lcWCFmW/U9CYYH8IYnn apuGOE53x4aYTJbQoQEJikOM/t7e96v1XXQvc5gsCtQMXoWEujkjRNXxzT5au0h9TDL9 iHmO1/3lJxVgUl/xrUBFu3SN60qk4tUxElpB0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=xe4lMc8i6padJjcKBxYPO1r7eSn/PVEhw6ebGS37rfLIQMtxTQLj/8sVi/0uRCpdlJ xecvdar79Iq23u+6f9FE5bA0gwHU9pttKBNPHBQSjf30zQorg3aEyKR79TkaxkkPxZis pt3xmnRDjgskin23dYbG0Sd7rgltIQGY1DT04= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.81.65 with SMTP id w1mr113546fak.46.1250821003313; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:16:43 -0500 Message-ID: <2d1264630908201916od427177kc5dd5fc699e93096@mail.gmail.com> From: Jason Harmening To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Fatal trap 30 w/ latest 8.0-BETA2/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:41:10 -0000 Sorry for the partial dump--I don't (yet) have a swap partition, so I can't do postmortem: Machine is nehalem (4 cores + HT): FreeBSD riviera.austin.rr.com 8.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 8.0-BETA2 #1: Thu Aug 20 09:06:25 CDT 2009 jason@riviera.austin.rr.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM amd64 current process = 11 (idle: cpu1) [Thread pid 11 tid 100009 ] Stopped at acpi_cpu_c1+0x6: popq %rbp Tracing pid 11 tid 100009 td 0xffffff000169dab0 acpi_cpu_c1() at acpi_cpu_c1+0x6 acpi_cpu_idle() at acpi_cpu_idle+0x13b cpu_idle_acpi() at cpu_idle_acpi+0x1f cpu_idle() at cpu_idle+0x1c sched_idletd() at sched_idletd+0x258 fork_exit() at fork_exit+0x147 fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0xe --- trap 0, rip = 0, rsp = 0xffffff8000076d30, rbp = 0 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 21 03:21:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A296210656C9 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 03:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmdlnkid@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f199.google.com (mail-yw0-f199.google.com [209.85.211.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5104A8FC57 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 03:21:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh37 with SMTP id 37so579278ywh.28 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:20:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:message-id:references:user-agent:x-openpgp-key-id :x-openpgp-key-fingerprint:mime-version:content-type; bh=HXainx2M4RXgnQmiTH1PKr0f8Jf0MNUnNo7WMupHvGI=; b=lkP7fJMWhkPt+0UaADtuM/pctoTMzAmKx1QD59hRbTfjD8DLkuLFmuY2eARuiYd8x+ qxR/krxLziX2g6GJS0mvjs7vwyHiytgyv47v30p3oUuYzvC9cBmUomvtvJtqgCddNlFi fgDi11+AZmCRHu1Obj9FDxF/DH/XojN1BFH14= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:x-openpgp-key-id:x-openpgp-key-fingerprint:mime-version :content-type; b=YOl0CatotuiNXNWSPrWlhXr5LXgT9q/cIvm6hwwkjxmC+r7Bm6+wgfg3bekHt1dBYX TlG9nm+yW2bmscYhbjmHsawty4U+fOyQaroktkJVECNOmgHYR76mI76ylz6UA/erjLSj ffBpBhiG6T/BvyUsr4YRyPg9O8nRSngj/lSy0= Received: by 10.91.161.34 with SMTP id n34mr503703ago.78.1250824859800; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:20:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from firewall.5p.local (adsl-99-19-46-123.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net [99.19.46.123]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm1473618agb.65.2009.08.20.20.20.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:20:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:20:44 -0400 From: CmdLnKid To: Daniel O'Connor In-Reply-To: <200908202212.22831.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Message-ID: References: <200908201204.24914.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20090820114807.GQ9623@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <200908202212.22831.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 0xDFFDD218 X-OpenPGP-Key-Fingerprint: 2924 1C72 A6C2 852A 2094 25EE 9968 2636 DFFD D218 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Kostik Belousov , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: Blocked process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 03:21:00 -0000 On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:42 -0000, doconnor wrote: > On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Kostik Belousov wrote: >>> Things like ls on the console might take several seconds to respond >>> when the box didn't seem to be very busy (but wasn't idle, maybe >>> serving a little NFS). It wasn't the shell getting swapped out or >>> anything else obvious. This was on SMP, not using X. The problem >>> went away with 6.4R (had to stay with 6.x for unrelated reasons). >> >> 6.1 was released with a bug in NFS server, causing serious slowdown >> when non-MPSAFE fs was exported. > > Hmmm.. this is 6.2 (and a half) so I guess that's not my problem. > > Next! ;) > I had a problem like this once when the NFS mount stopped responding and any command that was issued seemed to hang. This all was happening while not paying attention to the NFS mount and that mount being various directories under /var and including /var/mail. A little deeper I eventually came across and what made me feel pretty stupid is that the "$SHELL" whether it be csh, ksh, bash or sh checks for mail on command completion or invocation and being so that the NFS mount stopped responding the process would hang until the mount came back or the machine was rebooted. I continued for a while using /var/mail over NFS while setting or unset mail variables for the shell. You may also want to check into whether something is trying to acquire a lock on a file over that NFS mount which could accrue some extra time making it seem like a process is hung. -- - (2^(N-1)) From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 21 08:18:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88088106564A for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:18:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oloringr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f209.google.com (mail-ew0-f209.google.com [209.85.219.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6308FC62 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy5 with SMTP id 5so1044428ewy.36 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:18:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=V6QLz6gn+xgfFgIhKKrU7zNZhX8R+KWO0MT+4U8Uegs=; b=fVXk0Y6sNa8ozZgP21SuXO6r/Xo4fT98PM+DW1RLHPfJc9w4/M6vyWwa2MQbLj8+dO dAYWSVDZI/4AzyibjcG/EklyT6jCBhUcD2mHsTedPrNOTppyX1Hh9CKhdj1X0NZc8Y4n uLFHgN9AVo5SGQZJ8FObSZa/01uETt+DRl+aw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=Bo3NPh/uY5RVUONYWnAFGi/vr/NwqdzhyQGvWyOmRNgbzDhIWHWOaOtusIhUAeB4Ve davwMnNEGTBIeEl/IktP8vLS3Ids85jBrTHCIDR3NeNezn4e+PuAY7eUV0FiAdkm3qvC Rf7FLPcFx3L+q0nfbecvZZ4AA4c4KSY6XtqfM= Received: by 10.216.30.81 with SMTP id j59mr148691wea.50.1250841150179; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:52:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from media.localnet (adsl202-15.kln.forthnet.gr [79.103.15.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p10sm8552033gvf.4.2009.08.21.00.52.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:52:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Ed Jobs To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:52:30 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.0 (Linux/2.6.30-ARCH; KDE/4.3.0; i686; ; ) References: <20090820235651.EFE271CC09@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: <20090820235651.EFE271CC09@ptavv.es.net> X-Face: %5EDs|At1pm>WE%P0}6)Hi*s, JH2J${69~j)R"Yu'^P9R3#fvi{LmpsCzxvX*38/, kxcUd QVrlS0G,}-ll{||\P]; *'Gz`RTG+dzconmNyDY3rJHBmpEJkFj|; %vZO&~T")='B<; 88~[ Cltx6#}N*E MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6105455.fntTbTakut"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908211052.30697.oloringr@gmail.com> Subject: Re: livelocks and deadlocks on 8.0BETA2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:18:41 -0000 --nextPart6105455.fntTbTakut Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday 21 August 2009 02:56, Kevin Oberman wrote: > I have a quad-core system that I updated to 8.0 about 2 weeks=20 ago. It > ran fine until yesterday when I used the PATA/ATAPI DVD drive to=20 read a > disk. Then the fun began. I saw two totally different presentations,=20 but > I hope that they both are manifestations of the same problem. > [snip] i have no idea about the second problem, but the 1st one it's not=20 fbsd-specific. it has happened to me on a linux box. repeatedly i=20 might add. after a couple of hours playing videos, X would use 100%=20 of cpu and i wasn't able to switch to a VTY or kill it via ctrl-alt- backspace. i think it might be a problem related to mplayer, but i'm not sure,=20 cause it did not crash, so no bad-behavour log. on the linux box, it's easy to handle (just /etc/rc.d/kdm restart via=20 ssh). But since fbsd doesn't use kdm it's only reboot. i don't use mplayer or X on my fbsd box so i don't really know on what=20 version X or mplayer are. The problem has stopped happening on the=20 linux box. it uses mplayer 29411-3 and xorg-server 1.6.3-3. just my 2 cents --nextPart6105455.fntTbTakut Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkqOUj4ACgkQBPpdVEWKA33RiQCg3GnqTrBGNwsU99HKywST6a8S UNcAnimHkOPXkASk2yD+ls8VvrwewKbt =M2RL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6105455.fntTbTakut-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 21 14:50:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD13106568E for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:50:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikael@t-online.hu) Received: from thor.iszerviz.hu (thor.iszerviz.hu [62.77.131.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34FB48FC55 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:50:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.2.2.230] (m0n0.iszerviz.hu [62.77.131.200]) by thor.iszerviz.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520755006F for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:26:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4A8EAE86.2000108@t-online.hu> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:26:14 +0200 From: Mikael Bak User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Upgrade FreeBSD 7.1 to 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:50:05 -0000 Hi list, I would like to do a binary upgrade from 7.1 to 7.2. I've seen the instructions here: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.2R/announce.html I've heard that it's safest to start the machine in single user mode when doing upgrades, but I see no notice about it in the announcement. So my question is: Is it ok to do this binary upgrade without start single user mode first? If no, must I reboot my machine to enter single user mode? TIA, Mikael From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 21 15:15:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50BC8106568F for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:15:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from mailgw.es.net (mail4.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:6000:6::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D288FC13 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:15:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:910::29]) by mailgw.es.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n7LFFqH4006546 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:15:55 -0700 Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 11B3B1CC09; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:15:52 -0700 (PDT) To: Ed Jobs In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:52:30 +0300." <200908211052.30697.oloringr@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:15:52 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20090821151552.11B3B1CC09@ptavv.es.net> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2009-08-21_10:2009-08-11, 2009-08-21, 2009-08-21 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0907200000 definitions=main-0908210034 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: livelocks and deadlocks on 8.0BETA2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:15:57 -0000 > From: Ed Jobs > Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:52:30 +0300 > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > On Friday 21 August 2009 02:56, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > I have a quad-core system that I updated to 8.0 about 2 weeks > ago. It > > ran fine until yesterday when I used the PATA/ATAPI DVD drive to > read a > > disk. Then the fun began. I saw two totally different presentations, > but > > I hope that they both are manifestations of the same problem. > > > > [snip] > > i have no idea about the second problem, but the 1st one it's not > fbsd-specific. it has happened to me on a linux box. repeatedly i > might add. after a couple of hours playing videos, X would use 100% > of cpu and i wasn't able to switch to a VTY or kill it via ctrl-alt- > backspace. > i think it might be a problem related to mplayer, but i'm not sure, > cause it did not crash, so no bad-behavour log. > on the linux box, it's easy to handle (just /etc/rc.d/kdm restart via > ssh). But since fbsd doesn't use kdm it's only reboot. > > i don't use mplayer or X on my fbsd box so i don't really know on what > version X or mplayer are. The problem has stopped happening on the > linux box. it uses mplayer 29411-3 and xorg-server 1.6.3-3. Okay. Since it shows up with very different players (mplayer and xine), it sounds like an Xorg issue. Could you tell me what graphics card you are running on the Linux box? I have an NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT with the NV driver and a pair of 1280x1024 screens. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 21 16:10:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422C2106568B for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oloringr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f209.google.com (mail-ew0-f209.google.com [209.85.219.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCFB28FC0C for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy5 with SMTP id 5so1346015ewy.36 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:10:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=EQbbSTA/0eM3T8UE8DSaV8505XbfYVWIxn2//nOQYdU=; b=t2EMu/d0dItPqpuewpla8OGMlFaMPleTom1iqM6Ei0lnYN0oA+JWn19JOcYlws+z/4 dq/264HLa1U2Q9uweJGVoi93w2MOOzpNg8D8OF7mI/UwT0cOxkTOK6mOWTKNSIpXiiJ3 GD/T/nfzGXYkMm9jw/1N6St5XVZ38Kdd9n9pk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=E9gAIdjzW4BzMQ2bKGeN6i98ZJ9UDk5BBLX7cXZVloIVdYrNbn9WX7sWASQTa3TmyB pUSuJCv4Dy2PPVvjREKeDAaeaPix4y0TBi8t53D46EPGo2c8ulVEjb17K6MZZOr+JAxp yxlYLkUFDfDpLk8DATb7jn/3qQh+mxkHX1s90= Received: by 10.216.1.81 with SMTP id 59mr236876wec.155.1250871011639; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:10:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from media.localnet (adsl202-15.kln.forthnet.gr [79.103.15.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x6sm10154455gvf.24.2009.08.21.09.10.10 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:10:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Ed Jobs To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:10:11 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.0 (Linux/2.6.30-ARCH; KDE/4.3.0; i686; ; ) References: <20090821151552.11B3B1CC09@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: <20090821151552.11B3B1CC09@ptavv.es.net> X-Face: %5EDs|At1pm>WE%P0}6)Hi*s, JH2J${69~j)R"Yu'^P9R3#fvi{LmpsCzxvX*38/, kxcUd QVrlS0G,}-ll{||\P]; *'Gz`RTG+dzconmNyDY3rJHBmpEJkFj|; %vZO&~T")='B<; 88~[ Cltx6#}N*E MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1943275.AthRyMABGO"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908211910.11541.oloringr@gmail.com> Subject: Re: livelocks and deadlocks on 8.0BETA2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:10:13 -0000 --nextPart1943275.AthRyMABGO Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday 21 August 2009 18:15, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > From: Ed Jobs > > Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:52:30 +0300 > > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > > > On Friday 21 August 2009 02:56, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > I have a quad-core system that I updated to 8.0 about 2 weeks > > > > ago. It > > > > > ran fine until yesterday when I used the PATA/ATAPI DVD drive to > > > > read a > > > > > disk. Then the fun began. I saw two totally different=20 presentations, > > > > but > > > > > I hope that they both are manifestations of the same problem. > > > > [snip] > > > > i have no idea about the second problem, but the 1st one it's=20 not > > fbsd-specific. it has happened to me on a linux box. repeatedly i > > might add. after a couple of hours playing videos, X would use=20 100% > > of cpu and i wasn't able to switch to a VTY or kill it via ctrl-alt- > > backspace. > > i think it might be a problem related to mplayer, but i'm not sure, > > cause it did not crash, so no bad-behavour log. > > on the linux box, it's easy to handle (just /etc/rc.d/kdm restart via > > ssh). But since fbsd doesn't use kdm it's only reboot. > > > > i don't use mplayer or X on my fbsd box so i don't really know on=20 what > > version X or mplayer are. The problem has stopped happening on=20 the > > linux box. it uses mplayer 29411-3 and xorg-server 1.6.3-3. > > Okay. Since it shows up with very different players (mplayer and=20 xine), > it sounds like an Xorg issue. Could you tell me what graphics card=20 you > are running on the Linux box? > > I have an NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT with the NV driver and a pair of > 1280x1024 screens. i use the nvidia driver on a GTX280 driver version: 185.18.31 --nextPart1943275.AthRyMABGO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkqOxuMACgkQBPpdVEWKA31IeACg0l7NhcxJdUAm1VvaVqg/ayhk liMAoNi3RjetuY2Qtdcdj5apyhxJj9pc =vCnJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1943275.AthRyMABGO-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 21 16:16:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C0F1065691 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:16:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Carlos.Paniago@cnptia.embrapa.br) Received: from plutao.cnptia.embrapa.br (plutao.cnptia.embrapa.br [200.0.70.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D4E8FC0C for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:16:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.cnptia.embrapa.br [127.0.0.1]) by plutao.cnptia.embrapa.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id E830C846C3 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:59:31 -0300 (BRT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cnptia.embrapa.br Received: from plutao.cnptia.embrapa.br ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (plutao.cnptia.embrapa.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id d9ZyXZd6hAsR for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:59:28 -0300 (BRT) Received: from [10.129.3.27] (a027.cnptia.embrapa.br [10.129.3.27]) by plutao.cnptia.embrapa.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F59846C1 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:59:28 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <4A8EC460.2020903@cnptia.embrapa.br> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:59:28 -0300 From: Carlos Fernando Assis Paniago User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090811) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Compilation problem in 7.2-STABLE - module cpuctl.c X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:16:19 -0000 when compiling a 7.2 STABLE kernel in an amd64 machine I found: ===> coda5 (all) ===> coretemp (all) ===> cpuctl (all) cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -std=c99 -nostdinc -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/A027/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -fno-common -fno-omit-frame-pointer -I/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/A027 -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -c /usr/src/sys/modules/cpuctl/../../dev/cpuctl/cpuctl.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cpuctl/../../dev/cpuctl/cpuctl.c: In function 'cpuctl_ioctl': /usr/src/sys/modules/cpuctl/../../dev/cpuctl/cpuctl.c:162: error: 'CPUCTL_MSRSBIT' undeclared (first use in this function) /usr/src/sys/modules/cpuctl/../../dev/cpuctl/cpuctl.c:162: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once /usr/src/sys/modules/cpuctl/../../dev/cpuctl/cpuctl.c:162: error: for each function it appears in.) /usr/src/sys/modules/cpuctl/../../dev/cpuctl/cpuctl.c:163: error: 'CPUCTL_MSRCBIT' undeclared (first use in this function) /usr/src/sys/modules/cpuctl/../../dev/cpuctl/cpuctl.c: In function 'cpuctl_do_msr': /usr/src/sys/modules/cpuctl/../../dev/cpuctl/cpuctl.c:239: error: 'CPUCTL_MSRSBIT' undeclared (first use in this function) /usr/src/sys/modules/cpuctl/../../dev/cpuctl/cpuctl.c:245: error: 'CPUCTL_MSRCBIT' undeclared (first use in this function) *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/cpuctl. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/A027. a027# Someone with the same problem? Do you know a solution? Paniago. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 21 16:30:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6172106568B for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:30:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B188FC13 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:30:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.codelab.cz [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2097F19E047; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:30:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (r5bb235.net.upc.cz [86.49.61.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB3A419E044; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:30:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4A8ECB9C.2020909@quip.cz> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:30:20 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: cz, cs, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mikael Bak References: <4A8EAE86.2000108@t-online.hu> In-Reply-To: <4A8EAE86.2000108@t-online.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade FreeBSD 7.1 to 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:30:25 -0000 Mikael Bak wrote: > Hi list, > > I would like to do a binary upgrade from 7.1 to 7.2. I've seen the > instructions here: > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.2R/announce.html > > I've heard that it's safest to start the machine in single user mode > when doing upgrades, but I see no notice about it in the announcement. > > So my question is: Is it ok to do this binary upgrade without start > single user mode first? > > If no, must I reboot my machine to enter single user mode? I always did upgrade in multiuser for minimalising the downtime of servers. Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 21 19:07:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97FBB106568E for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:07:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D7C8FC12 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:07:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12437 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2009 18:40:22 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 21 Aug 2009 18:40:22 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 9120D5082B; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:40:20 -0400 (EDT) To: Mikael Bak References: <4A8EAE86.2000108@t-online.hu> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:40:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A8EAE86.2000108@t-online.hu> (Mikael Bak's message of "Fri\, 21 Aug 2009 16\:26\:14 +0200") Message-ID: <44bpm9t3hn.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade FreeBSD 7.1 to 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:07:03 -0000 Mikael Bak writes: > I would like to do a binary upgrade from 7.1 to 7.2. I've seen the > instructions here: > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.2R/announce.html > > I've heard that it's safest to start the machine in single user mode > when doing upgrades, but I see no notice about it in the announcement. The announcement explicitly points to the FreeBSD Handbook for the procedure for doing source upgrades, which does indeed including booting the new kernel into single-user mode before doing the installworld. > So my question is: Is it ok to do this binary upgrade without start > single user mode first? Sure. It's riskier; if the new kernel doesn't boot, but you already have the new userland installed, you're stuck. You'll need to recover from some other bootable media, which may well take quite a while. Just how risky it is depends on how big a version jump you're making. > If no, must I reboot my machine to enter single user mode? Rebooting is at least as important as getting into single-user mode. You want to know your kernel is good. Single-user mode is good, too, because you don't want to change utilities out from under running processes if you can help it. All of that said, though, I do it all the time on lightly loaded machines. I always reboot after completing the upgrade, and usually also in between the installkernel and installworld. Trying the upgrade on a test machine first helps reduce the risk as well. Unfortunately, machines that you want to avoid downtime on are usually the same ones that you really can't afford to fail an upgrade... From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 22 08:56:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4DF106568D for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:56:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C72A8FC08 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:56:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kuzbass.ru (kost [213.184.65.82]) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7M8jV5U082718; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:45:31 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru) Message-ID: <4A8FB02B.A2F7294F@kuzbass.ru> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:45:31 +0800 From: Eugene Grosbein Organization: SVZServ X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Oberman References: <20090820235651.EFE271CC09@ptavv.es.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: livelocks and deadlocks on 8.0BETA2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:56:24 -0000 Kevin Oberman wrote: > Then it got worse. The second time this happened, I inserted an erased > DVD while the system was in POST. The system started to boot, but, > shortly after probing acd0, while the boot was "waiting for: usbus7 > usbus6 usbus5 usbus4 usbus3 usbus2 usbus1 usbus0", and about the time it > should have probed for cd0 (atapicam), the system locked up and would not > finish the boot. This is prior to mounting root. > > After several repeats of this, I ejected the disk from the drive and it > booted just fine. Clearly something with ATAPI is not happy. Should I > not be using atapicam with 8.0? This one is old one. I get it sometimes since 7.0 (perhaps, 6.x affected too) on my desktop and it sometimes repeats with 8.0-BETA2 too (GENERIC kernel). It's some kind of race condition because it does not always hang, but often enough to be annoying. There should be a media in drive to make it happen, blank or written. Eugene Grosbein From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 22 10:04:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92D3106568F; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:04:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83488FC13; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:04:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B6A646B66; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 06:04:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:04:52 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: current@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Quick 8.0 update: BETA3 builds in progress X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:04:53 -0000 For those tracking the 8.0 release process, BETA3 builds have now started. They were held up for a few days while a few critical issues were resolved: - Changes to make newbus MPSAFE were reverted as they lead to reports of a number of WITNESS warnings and panics during device driver attach/detach. - Another nit in the Subversion->CVS updater was resolved. - The flowtable crash at boot reported by several users has been resolved. - A boot-time hang for users of the htprr driver has been resolved. - ZFS zpool import was fixed. - freebsd-update now backs up the old kernel before installing a new one. You can find a regularly updated release status, the above information, and much more, on the 8.0 release engineering wiki page: http://wiki.freebsd.org/8.0TODO I don't have a specific ETA on BETA3 going out the door, except to say that so far several architectures have reported back on successful builds, so probably quite soon. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 22 11:32:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD351106568C for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:32:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880008FC21 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:32:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0424246B92; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 07:32:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:32:11 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <4A8ECB9C.2020909@quip.cz> Message-ID: References: <4A8EAE86.2000108@t-online.hu> <4A8ECB9C.2020909@quip.cz> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Mikael Bak , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade FreeBSD 7.1 to 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:32:12 -0000 On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >> I would like to do a binary upgrade from 7.1 to 7.2. I've seen the >> instructions here: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.2R/announce.html >> >> I've heard that it's safest to start the machine in single user mode when >> doing upgrades, but I see no notice about it in the announcement. >> >> So my question is: Is it ok to do this binary upgrade without start single >> user mode first? >> >> If no, must I reboot my machine to enter single user mode? > > I always did upgrade in multiuser for minimalising the downtime of servers. I always do it this way, but accept the risk involved. I actually did my 7.x -> 8.x upgrade on my web/shell server this way, with users logged in, but I think that's probably only for the brave of heart. FWIW, the main problem I ran into with my 8.0 upgrade is that 8.0 uses the uart(4) driver for serial ports, and sio(4), 7.2's default, has been removed. They require mutually exclusive lines in device.hints and different /etc/ttys lines. If you rely on a serial console, I would recommend first switching 7.2 to using uart, pausing for a bit, and then switching forward to 8 so that you separate the risks associated with changing console drivers from those associated with sliding a major kernel version. Robert From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 22 12:13:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836DD106564A for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward13.yandex.ru (forward13.yandex.ru [95.108.130.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3BB8FC21 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp15.yandex.ru (smtp15.yandex.ru [95.108.130.69]) by forward13.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id B2E83A78268 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:52:08 +0400 (MSD) Received: from smeshariki.local (unknown [77.66.147.84]) by smtp15.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTPSA id 7DA814E28263 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:52:08 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <4A8FDAFF.2070800@yandex.ru> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:48:15 +0400 From: "R.Mahmatkhanov" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090626) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Yandex-TimeMark: 1250941928 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 X-Yandex-Front: smtp15.yandex.ru Subject: RELENG_8: buildworld stops on usr.bin/rpcgen X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:13:14 -0000 Good day! I'm want to build the system from RELENG_8 (BETA3 for now) tree to give it a try. # mv /usr/src /usr/src.old # csup stable-supfile { *default host=cvsup.FreeBSD.org, *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 } # cat /etc/make.conf WITH_GECKO=libxul WITH_PYTHON=yes WITHOUT_JAVA=yes PERL_VERSION=5.10.0 WITH_APACHE=2.2+ MALLOC_PRODUCTION=yes # ls -l /etc/malloc.conf lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 2 21 авг 15:45 /etc/malloc.conf -> aj # uname -srp FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE i386 # sysctl kern.osreldate kern.osreldate: 702104 # cd /usr/src # make clean && rm -rf /usr/obj/* # make buildworld && make kernel KERNCONF=BEST8 <...> ===> usr.bin/rpcgen (obj,depend,all,install) /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/src/usr.bin/rpcgen created for /usr/src/usr.bin/rpcgen rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/include /usr/src/usr.bin/rpcgen/rpc_main.c /usr/src/usr.bin/rpcgen/rpc_clntout.c /usr/src/usr.bin/rpcgen/rpc_cout.c /usr/src/usr.bin/rpcgen/rpc_hout.c /usr/src/usr.bin/rpcgen/rpc_parse.c /usr/src/usr.bin/rpcgen/rpc_sample.c /usr/src/usr.bin/rpcgen/rpc_scan.c /usr/src/usr.bin/rpcgen/rpc_svcout.c /usr/src/usr.bin/rpcgen/rpc_tblout.c /usr/src/usr.bin/rpcgen/rpc_util.c /usr/src/usr.bin/rpcgen/rpc_clntout.c:46:23: error: rpc/types.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/usr.bin/rpcgen/rpc_parse.c:46:23: error: rpc/types.h: No such file or directory mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/rpcgen. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. # grep \$FreeBSD /usr/src/sys/rpc/types.h * $FreeBSD: src/sys/rpc/types.h,v 1.13.4.1 2009/08/03 08:13:06 kensmith Exp $ # grep \$FreeBSD /usr/src/include/rpc/types.h grep: /usr/src/include/rpc/types.h: No such file or directory Can anybody confirm this or it's some my local problem? Thanks in advance, Ruslan From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 22 12:41:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23694106564A for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:41:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A89C8FC08 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:41:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (ppp121-45-173-89.lns11.adl2.internode.on.net [121.45.173.89]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7MCftu5069397 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 22 Aug 2009 22:11:55 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: CmdLnKid Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 22:11:51 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <200908201204.24914.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200908202212.22831.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2189034.H4FRexxu99"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908222211.52878.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -1.527 () AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: Kostik Belousov , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: Blocked process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:41:58 -0000 --nextPart2189034.H4FRexxu99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, CmdLnKid wrote: > came back or the machine was rebooted. I continued for a while using > /var/mail over NFS while setting or unset mail variables for the > shell. You may also want to check into whether something is trying to > acquire a lock on a file over that NFS mount which could accrue some > extra time making it seem like a process is hung. We don't have any NFS mounts so I don't think that's it :( =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart2189034.H4FRexxu99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBKj+eQ5ZPcIHs/zowRAvhTAJ9Q3u9q3KoXyHNhXMeIvY084iOmtQCeNnAA MlUPbiiZcARK9NGp+eoqAKg= =kRe8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2189034.H4FRexxu99-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 22 12:45:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259841065690 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:45:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91EF8FC16 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:45:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n7MCPb5Z029349; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:25:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <200908221225.n7MCPb5Z029349@lava.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:28:51 -0400 To: Robert Watson , current@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quick 8.0 update: BETA3 builds in progress X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:45:44 -0000 At 06:04 AM 8/22/2009, Robert Watson wrote: >I don't have a specific ETA on BETA3 going out the door, except to >say that so far several architectures have reported back on >successful builds, so probably quite soon. Just an FYI about builds, the HEAD tinderbox after getting a hardware update is now building RELENG_8 as well http://tinderbox.freebsd.org/ ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 22 14:07:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95811106568C; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:07:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from constantine.ticketswitch.com (constantine.ticketswitch.com [IPv6:2002:57e0:1d4e:1::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D60B8FC13; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dilbert.rattatosk ([10.64.50.6] helo=dilbert.ticketswitch.com) by constantine.ticketswitch.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1MerFf-000Ilj-LA; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:07:27 +0100 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ticketswitch.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1MerFf-000ARg-KF; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:07:27 +0100 To: current@FreeBSD.org, rwatson@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:07:27 +0100 Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Quick 8.0 update: BETA3 builds in progress X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:07:41 -0000 > I don't have a specific ETA on BETA3 going out the door, except to say that so > far several architectures have reported back on successful builds, so probably > quite soon. Is there any point in making bug reports for BETA2 at this point ? I only got to try it a coupleof days ago, and had a big issue with installing (had to use 7.2 to partition the drive) but I am thinkingthat maybe just waiting and re-doing the test with BETA3 is better ? cheers, -pete. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 22 14:13:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2AA1065692; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:13:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874238FC1A; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:13:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED75C46B1A; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:13:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:13:09 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Pete French In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Quick 8.0 update: BETA3 builds in progress X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:13:10 -0000 On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Pete French wrote: >> I don't have a specific ETA on BETA3 going out the door, except to say that >> so far several architectures have reported back on successful builds, so >> probably quite soon. > > Is there any point in making bug reports for BETA2 at this point ? I only > got to try it a coupleof days ago, and had a big issue with installing (had > to use 7.2 to partition the drive) but I am thinkingthat maybe just waiting > and re-doing the test with BETA3 is better ? I think it's probably more useful to wait a day and retry with BETA3. I don't know that the issue you're experiencing has been fixed, but given that there were some partitioning-related fixes (see the wiki page for a complete list) it's possible that something like it was. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 22 14:21:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8C3106568C for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:21:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CFD8FC1F for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:21:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E9DF46B09; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:21:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:21:50 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Daniel O'Connor In-Reply-To: <200908222211.52878.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Message-ID: References: <200908201204.24914.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200908202212.22831.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200908222211.52878.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Kostik Belousov , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: Blocked process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:21:50 -0000 On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, CmdLnKid wrote: >> came back or the machine was rebooted. I continued for a while using >> /var/mail over NFS while setting or unset mail variables for the shell. You >> may also want to check into whether something is trying to acquire a lock >> on a file over that NFS mount which could accrue some extra time making it >> seem like a process is hung. > > We don't have any NFS mounts so I don't think that's it :( Hi Daniel-- A number of issues were corrected over the course of the 6.x life span involving scheduing, including some relating to "lost wakeups". Many bug fixes relating to threading were also introduced (not sure if that's relevant to your workload). While it's never a particularly fun recommendation, I think I'd suggest sliding forward to the most recent 6.x kernel (but otherwise identical configuration), perhaps sticking with your current userspace, and seeing if that resolves the issue. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 22 23:14:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4395C106568B; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 23:14:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB6D8FC0C; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 23:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (ppp121-45-173-89.lns11.adl2.internode.on.net [121.45.173.89]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7MNE7Nh077085 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 23 Aug 2009 08:44:07 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Robert Watson Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 08:43:53 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <200908201204.24914.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200908222211.52878.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1828320.9GPGPxByzW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908230844.01585.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -1.533 () AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: Kostik Belousov , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: Blocked process X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 23:14:10 -0000 --nextPart1828320.9GPGPxByzW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Robert Watson wrote: > On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, CmdLnKid wrote: > >> came back or the machine was rebooted. I continued for a while > >> using /var/mail over NFS while setting or unset mail variables for > >> the shell. You may also want to check into whether something is > >> trying to acquire a lock on a file over that NFS mount which could > >> accrue some extra time making it seem like a process is hung. > > > > We don't have any NFS mounts so I don't think that's it :( > > A number of issues were corrected over the course of the 6.x life > span involving scheduing, including some relating to "lost wakeups".=20 > Many bug fixes relating to threading were also introduced (not sure > if that's relevant to your workload). While it's never a > particularly fun recommendation, I think I'd suggest sliding forward > to the most recent 6.x kernel (but otherwise identical > configuration), perhaps sticking with your current userspace, and > seeing if that resolves the issue. OK, should be feasible to do that I think. Luckily people at this site=20 don't need to drive for a few hours to fix the PC :) Thanks. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1828320.9GPGPxByzW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBKkHu55ZPcIHs/zowRAqVEAJ9H7AyzgmE1AuPVTmMA6TLSMxAhHQCfRn3B rnsIELjInNd2kKZv3rC4CgI= =NN6D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1828320.9GPGPxByzW--