From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 28 00:29:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D5B1065670 for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 00:29:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14B68FC16 for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 00:29:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ur.dons.net.au (ppp118-210-181-105.lns20.adl6.internode.on.net [118.210.181.105]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p7S0C4Sa087192 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:42:10 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: "Daniel O'Connor" In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 09:42:04 +0930 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <556ADB48-FC69-4BC1-A1A7-28692A96196F@gsoft.com.au> References: To: Aryeh Friedman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) X-Spam-Score: 2.162 (**) BAYES_00,KHOP_DYNAMIC,RDNS_DYNAMIC X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , Dustyn , Steven Platt Subject: Re: best way to get distfiles added to ports.tgz during make release X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 00:29:37 -0000 On 28/08/2011, at 1:09, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > I have made a custom install USB drive from R/cdrom/dvd1 and pkg_add = works > fine for everything but xorg/nvidia-driver so part of the post install > script I made is "portmaster xorg/nvidia-driver" the only problem is = it then > needs to fetch the distfiles (the target install machine{s) will not = have > nic's attached)... so my questoin is whats the best way to make it so = when > sysinstall unpacks ./8.2-NHK_KIOSK/ports/ports.tgz that the distfiles = are > also unpacked? I would suggest that you don't use ports :) If you want it all ready to go then build all the packages you want and = add then in a script. Alternatively you can do what I do, and create a chroot, build all the = ports you want, then tar it up and splat it onto the destination disk = after a minimal install. That way you can tweak to your hearts content and it is considerably = faster than pkg_add. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 28 00:48:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1C1106566B; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 00:48:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA3E14EC63; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 00:48:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E599061.8010908@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 17:48:33 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110824 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Devin Teske References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD RC , FreeBSD Hackers , FreeBSD Jail , Devin Teske , Dave Robison Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add /etc/rc.d/vimage startup script for creating vnet jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 00:48:35 -0000 Please stop cross-posting to multiple lists. If you want review for an rc.d issue post it to freebsd-rc@. Thanks, Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 29 14:46:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060511065672 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:46:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BC28FC15 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:46:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qy36m-0005Xx-NC for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:46:40 +0200 Received: from 213.202.123.81 ([213.202.123.81]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:46:40 +0200 Received: from ivoras by 213.202.123.81 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:46:40 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:46:29 +0200 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.202.123.81 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:46:42 -0000 On 26/08/2011 19:44, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: > > ... > >> I think that I'll need a 9-CURRENT snapshot on it to run all 128 CPUs, >> right? > > A 9.0-BETA1 snapshot, yes. Well, I'll leave it another half an hour but the 9.9-beta1 shapshot froze on boot after showing a "SRAT: No CPU found for memory domain 4". (all this after the traditional "do-nothing" pause of 10-or so minutes before displaying the copyright banner). From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 29 15:11:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4AA1065670 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:11:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61BF8FC15 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qy3Ur-0008Jw-PP for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:11:33 +0200 Received: from 213.202.123.81 ([213.202.123.81]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:11:33 +0200 Received: from ivoras by 213.202.123.81 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:11:33 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:11:21 +0200 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.202.123.81 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:11:35 -0000 On 29/08/2011 16:46, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 26/08/2011 19:44, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: >> >> ... >> >>> I think that I'll need a 9-CURRENT snapshot on it to run all 128 CPUs, >>> right? >> >> A 9.0-BETA1 snapshot, yes. > > Well, I'll leave it another half an hour but the 9.9-beta1 shapshot > froze on boot after showing a "SRAT: No CPU found for memory domain 4". > > (all this after the traditional "do-nothing" pause of 10-or so minutes > before displaying the copyright banner). No luck - it's frozen. Linux and Windows Server work fine. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 29 15:15:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD36106564A; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:15:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925B78FC14; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:15:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id SAA08862; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:15:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4E5BAD20.7030202@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:15:44 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110705 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:15:47 -0000 on 29/08/2011 17:46 Ivan Voras said the following: > On 26/08/2011 19:44, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: >> >> ... >> >>> I think that I'll need a 9-CURRENT snapshot on it to run all 128 CPUs, >>> right? >> >> A 9.0-BETA1 snapshot, yes. > > Well, I'll leave it another half an hour but the 9.9-beta1 shapshot > froze on boot after showing a "SRAT: No CPU found for memory domain 4". > > (all this after the traditional "do-nothing" pause of 10-or so minutes > before displaying the copyright banner). Not sure if hw.memtest.tests tunable has made it into 9.0-BETA1. Setting it to zero should result in skipping the checks. You may also try to capture and share a verbose dmesg, if possible. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 29 15:20:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713F31065678; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:20:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8827A8FC19; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:20:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id SAA08928; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:20:48 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4E5BAE50.5030407@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:20:48 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110705 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: <4E5BAD20.7030202@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:20:51 -0000 on 29/08/2011 18:18 Ivan Voras said the following: > On 29 August 2011 17:15, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 29/08/2011 17:46 Ivan Voras said the following: >>> On 26/08/2011 19:44, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>>> I think that I'll need a 9-CURRENT snapshot on it to run all 128 CPUs, >>>>> right? >>>> >>>> A 9.0-BETA1 snapshot, yes. >>> >>> Well, I'll leave it another half an hour but the 9.9-beta1 shapshot >>> froze on boot after showing a "SRAT: No CPU found for memory domain 4". >>> >>> (all this after the traditional "do-nothing" pause of 10-or so minutes >>> before displaying the copyright banner). >> >> Not sure if hw.memtest.tests tunable has made it into 9.0-BETA1. >> Setting it to zero should result in skipping the checks. > > If it did, to what should I set it? See one line above your question :-) >> You may also try to capture and share a verbose dmesg, if possible. > > I'll take some photos of the screen. No serial console? :( -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 29 15:32:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BAB3106564A for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:32:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7658FC08 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so5858512gxk.13 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:32:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=MnNVHIN/Ur7NqE89qBaa/SUgywu+aCkCHXVqYDIgUqM=; b=K2wbiIk7OUKAPBadTKSzlg3kFVQ1t36pafGga8+TFRwiKSGdvjbF5P6GB8YyF9EaBi 4EV5tlP1ATcJJZSDIwRoMvWlg3ynJlXoZBtvW1a6XOruadF+qTlc5VmQ7/6DnoUWe/Qm GjpVbFqrci2GM6Rne/hrWKDRvQQP+Jx1GWRjM= Received: by 10.101.180.19 with SMTP id h19mr4022686anp.51.1314631512115; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:25:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: ivoras@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.47.11 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:24:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E5BAE50.5030407@FreeBSD.org> References: <4E5BAD20.7030202@FreeBSD.org> <4E5BAE50.5030407@FreeBSD.org> From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:24:32 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: SAD_WpV1aqJTjTTwuvymRYdG24w Message-ID: To: Andriy Gapon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:32:14 -0000 On 29 August 2011 17:20, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 29/08/2011 18:18 Ivan Voras said the following: >>> Not sure if hw.memtest.tests tunable has made it into 9.0-BETA1. >>> Setting it to zero should result in skipping the checks. >> >> If it did, to what should I set it? > > See one line above your question :-) Sorry :) I blame the ifluence of fan noise on my head :) >>> You may also try to capture and share a verbose dmesg, if possible. >> >> I'll take some photos of the screen. > > No serial console? :( There is on the server side but not on the client... didn't bring my usb2serial cable. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 29 15:49:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EFF8106564A for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:49:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D208FC12 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so5876063gxk.13 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:49:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=JcWO81njN72U7yRbimW6UCwEaRV2iOlEhTt2M3e5pFk=; b=RlPSMgRzDbIBf2At7FBIfzE4qmOHn8iiHmnT0kCGKmoVFMep+LSoEYkDhG6Cn9koFi KAlETb/4p2huAA3Tjie+7ae36eh1yK/9p4b38W/st4PPQBcKfWG0Mlmzha3ny0JLb5K1 5zxblyoBjNzrF/EcF/VPpx0bMeM67Iy+cn3Fs= Received: by 10.101.82.13 with SMTP id j13mr3837979anl.73.1314631167134; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:19:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: ivoras@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.47.11 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:18:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E5BAD20.7030202@FreeBSD.org> References: <4E5BAD20.7030202@FreeBSD.org> From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:18:47 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qLzNehSRgWD-gAZQ0723xFaVEPY Message-ID: To: Andriy Gapon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:49:39 -0000 On 29 August 2011 17:15, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 29/08/2011 17:46 Ivan Voras said the following: >> On 26/08/2011 19:44, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: >>> >>> ... >>> >>>> I think that I'll need a 9-CURRENT snapshot on it to run all 128 CPUs, >>>> right? >>> >>> A 9.0-BETA1 snapshot, yes. >> >> Well, I'll leave it another half an hour but the 9.9-beta1 shapshot >> froze on boot after showing a "SRAT: No CPU found for memory domain 4". >> >> (all this after the traditional "do-nothing" pause of 10-or so minutes >> before displaying the copyright banner). > > Not sure if hw.memtest.tests tunable has made it into 9.0-BETA1. > Setting it to zero should result in skipping the checks. If it did, to what should I set it? > You may also try to capture and share a verbose dmesg, if possible. I'll take some photos of the screen. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 29 17:03:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB0F106566B; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:03:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mdf356@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959628FC13; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:03:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwc9 with SMTP id 9so4268800qwc.13 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:03:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=p8xrOARWg6/llW2wECMeZsnhh1PdlMJNf0CD/Se1fwI=; b=vtYYI5pvQsMbnYwRAVznmZ/U8lW0uSuCcGPZRJTrdgS+F0V3y9HrE7SZzBNSp+DJRI jkf593QQeft7sB2jCgW0YX1j9auolatfs9KeZIL7hqhvOY6Ar8TcUPBwUJ54A1cn5svJ ehkql5fwnOLxDW1zaW7JWzqRPC1sJ2YfwYW8U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.87.137 with SMTP id w9mr5757304qcl.284.1314635609977; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: mdf356@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.98.8 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:33:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:33:29 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ydgK4SNDOcKQUHw0NjIX3dJ_N6s Message-ID: From: mdf@FreeBSD.org To: Ivan Voras Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:03:51 -0000 On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 26/08/2011 19:44, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: >> >> ... >> >>> I think that I'll need a 9-CURRENT snapshot on it to run all 128 CPUs, >>> right? >> >> A 9.0-BETA1 snapshot, yes. > > Well, I'll leave it another half an hour but the 9.9-beta1 shapshot > froze on boot after showing a "SRAT: No CPU found for memory domain 4". This message implies the memory affinity information coming from ACPI is either non-sensical, or you have an unexpected physical setup where there really are CPUs with no memory in the local sockets. You should be able to boot with something like hint.srat.0="disabled" at the boot loader prompt. Thanks, matthew From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 29 17:29:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0831065675 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:29:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B682E8FC1D for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:29:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so5986443gwb.13 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:29:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZKBCFO2AmyCKb7en/gN8hYYQAkRML5KPC2FwoSSXuD0=; b=AvnFDuEc0Ns4EmOwclgcCC659ETxM51V44TTfsyoNqpX+BDagfc2UlSelt8E9pWTOm Gq93IoS+vw2HuujtCmxN1vlRiNLKUGH/VnHhQ+KQchk7B+jBvb2l0PZpq0jz5qkZEnnb h4MlVuJrhdewRnAsw9MP0sxcGwxyAWtWtZNtw= Received: by 10.100.35.1 with SMTP id i1mr4178091ani.139.1314638957124; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:29:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: ivoras@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.47.11 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:28:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 19:28:37 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WLCR3fVsBUhXIhlCLr48cfXoC0M Message-ID: To: mdf@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:29:18 -0000 On 29 August 2011 18:33, wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: >> On 26/08/2011 19:44, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: >>> >>> ... >>> >>>> I think that I'll need a 9-CURRENT snapshot on it to run all 128 CPUs, >>>> right? >>> >>> A 9.0-BETA1 snapshot, yes. >> >> Well, I'll leave it another half an hour but the 9.9-beta1 shapshot >> froze on boot after showing a "SRAT: No CPU found for memory domain 4". > > This message implies the memory affinity information coming from ACPI > is either non-sensical, or you have an unexpected physical setup where > there really are CPUs with no memory in the local sockets. > > You should be able to boot with something like hint.srat.0="disabled" > at the boot loader prompt. Unfortunately, neither the memtest or the srat disabling tunables worked (I also tried disabling srat.4). My time with the machine is over, so I can't do more testing. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 29 18:21:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F41106564A; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:21:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7255C8FC12; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11AF146B17; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:21:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CF468A037; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:21:20 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:15:32 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110617; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201108291415.32605.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:21:20 -0400 (EDT) Cc: mdf@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:21:21 -0000 On Monday, August 29, 2011 1:28:37 pm Ivan Voras wrote: > On 29 August 2011 18:33, wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: > >> On 26/08/2011 19:44, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: > >>> > >>> ... > >>> > >>>> I think that I'll need a 9-CURRENT snapshot on it to run all 128 CPUs, > >>>> right? > >>> > >>> A 9.0-BETA1 snapshot, yes. > >> > >> Well, I'll leave it another half an hour but the 9.9-beta1 shapshot > >> froze on boot after showing a "SRAT: No CPU found for memory domain 4". > > > > This message implies the memory affinity information coming from ACPI > > is either non-sensical, or you have an unexpected physical setup where > > there really are CPUs with no memory in the local sockets. > > > > You should be able to boot with something like hint.srat.0="disabled" > > at the boot loader prompt. > > Unfortunately, neither the memtest or the srat disabling tunables > worked (I also tried disabling srat.4). > > My time with the machine is over, so I can't do more testing. The hint to set would be 'hint.srat.0.disabled=1'. However, the SRAT code just ignores the table when it encounters an issue like this, it doesn't hang. Something else later in the boot must have hung. -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 29 18:38:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 612A31065670 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:38:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rank1seeker@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5B98FC13 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:38:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so6087847fxe.13 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:38:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:subject:date:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer; bh=TbcRKPNKRDlDMd++COxZ5dZlrtVRSFx0xgK+sovQ72k=; b=qBpYrfp7ypVT9E/XGzXTAsKBDzjNqYGsUv8Ma6qYYipy2etbepgNTUbaUkqnc31Zco PfpLVVQd9DD4rNMlvGgi9CDV/hXa6lwe0El+AY0WbPowqa/Ep3K8jCx+UiTb+j3Lk9OX XFTnm+03L+dzLPsNfD6HjTWuPJP6OrVV8jOUY= Received: by 10.223.99.65 with SMTP id t1mr7345302fan.93.1314641328322; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DEV ([82.193.208.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b14sm3949516fak.5.2011.08.29.11.08.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:08:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20110829.180846.937.1@DEV> From: rank1seeker@gmail.com To: hackers@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:08:46 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: POP Peeper (3.7.0.0) Cc: Subject: BUG: Entries in fstab with 'late' option, require order, with ntfs and ufs X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:38:08 -0000 This yields successfull boot=0D=0A--=0D=0A/dev/ufsid/4e5bbdf76b8b4567 = /usr/DOC ufs rw,late 0 0=0D=0A/dev/ufsid/4e5bbe036b8b4567 = /usr/SRC ufs ro,late,noatime 0 0=0D=0A=0D=0A# This are = WinXP drives:=0D=0A/dev/ada0s1 /mnt/win_c ntfs = rw,mountprog=3D/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 = 0=0D=0A/dev/ada0s5 /mnt/win_d ntfs = rw,mountprog=3D/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 = 0=0D=0A/dev/ada0s6 /mnt/win_e ntfs = rw,mountprog=3D/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 = 0=0D=0A--=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0AThis yields kick, in a single user = mode=0D=0A--=0D=0A# This are WinXP drives:=0D=0A/dev/ada0s1 = /mnt/win_c ntfs rw,mountprog=3D/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late = 0 0=0D=0A/dev/ada0s5 /mnt/win_d ntfs = rw,mountprog=3D/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 = 0=0D=0A/dev/ada0s6 /mnt/win_e ntfs = rw,mountprog=3D/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 = 0=0D=0A=0D=0A/dev/ufsid/4e5bbdf76b8b4567 /usr/DOC ufs = rw,late 0 0=0D=0A/dev/ufsid/4e5bbe036b8b4567 /usr/SRC ufs = ro,late,noatime 0 0=0D=0A--=0D=0A=0D=0Admesg = part:=0D=0A--=0D=0AMounting late file systems:NTFS signature is = missing.=0D=0AFailed to mount '/dev/ufsid/4e5bbdf76b8b4567': Invalid = argument=0D=0AThe device '/dev/ufsid/4e5bbdf76b8b4567' doesn't seem to = have a valid NTFS.=0D=0AMaybe the wrong device is used? Or the whole disk = instead of a=0D=0Apartition (e.g. /dev/sda, not /dev/sda1)? Or the other = way around?=0D=0ANTFS signature is missing.=0D=0AFailed to mount = '/dev/ufsid/4e5bbe036b8b4567': Invalid argument=0D=0AThe device = '/dev/ufsid/4e5bbe036b8b4567' doesn't seem to have a valid = NTFS.=0D=0AMaybe the wrong device is used? Or the whole disk instead of = a=0D=0Apartition (e.g. /dev/sda, not /dev/sda1)? Or the other way = around?=0D=0A.=0D=0AMounting /etc/fstab filesystems failed, startup = aborted=0D=0AERROR: ABORTING BOOT (sending SIGTERM to parent)!=0D=0AAug = 29 20:02:31 blackhole init: /bin/sh on /etc/rc terminated abnormally, = going=0D=0Ato single user mode=0D=0AEnter full pathname of shell or = RETURN for /bin/sh:=0D=0A--=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0ADomagoj Smol=E8i=E6 From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 12:16:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899DA106566C for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:16:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6275E8FC12 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:16:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00ABE46B17; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:16:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F40B8A02E; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:16:54 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:16:53 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110617; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201108300816.54198.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:16:54 -0400 (EDT) Cc: hilfi alkaff Subject: Re: pcie initialization with acpi X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:16:55 -0000 On Friday, August 26, 2011 9:02:34 pm hilfi alkaff wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to learn more of the above matter. After the MCFG table gets > discovered with acpi, what does the address given by the > ACPI_MCFG_ALLOCATION* tells you? Does that tell you the address of the > extended configuration space of pci express? No, it tells you about a memory-mapped region you can use for all PCI config access. The region is defined to give the full config space access per device (so the lower N bits in the address are used to address a given config register within a single device). This macro details how the address mapping works: #define PCIE_VADDR(base, reg, bus, slot, func) \ ((base) + \ ((((bus) & 0xff) << 20) | \ (((slot) & 0x1f) << 15) | \ (((func) & 0x7) << 12) | \ ((reg) & 0xfff))) So the lower 12 bits select the register and the next 16 bits specify the device's bus/slot/function. > Also, is BSD distinguishing between reading from pcie config & pci config? > Because there's this pciereg_cfgread() function that seem to do that. I > thought pcie config space is just at the offset of 0x100 from pci config > space? BSD only distinguishes in that it refuses to access registers above 0x100 if MCFG is not in use on x86. If MCFG is in use, it is used for all config access (both "standard" and "extended"). See this routine for an example: /* * Write configuration space register */ void pci_cfgregwrite(int bus, int slot, int func, int reg, u_int32_t data, int bytes) { if (cfgmech == CFGMECH_PCIE && (bus >= pcie_minbus && bus <= pcie_maxbus) && (bus != 0 || !(1 << slot & pcie_badslots))) pciereg_cfgwrite(bus, slot, func, reg, data, bytes); else pcireg_cfgwrite(bus, slot, func, reg, data, bytes); } If the device is on a bus managed by MCFG (pcie_minbus <= bus <= pcie_maxbus) and it's not subject to a quirk we use for some broken HT chipsets (the pcie_badslots that lists known "broken" slots on bus 0 for the broken chipsets), then MCFG is used for all config access. -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 12:24:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03BCE106566B; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:24:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98888FC0C; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:24:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52FB546B2E; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:24:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA7018A02E; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:24:01 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:24:01 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110617; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <20110829.180846.937.1@DEV> In-Reply-To: <20110829.180846.937.1@DEV> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201108300824.01387.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:24:01 -0400 (EDT) Cc: rank1seeker@gmail.com, Craig Rodrigues Subject: Re: BUG: Entries in fstab with 'late' option, require order, with ntfs and ufs X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:24:03 -0000 On Monday, August 29, 2011 2:08:46 pm rank1seeker@gmail.com wrote: > This yields successfull boot > -- > /dev/ufsid/4e5bbdf76b8b4567 /usr/DOC ufs rw,late 0 0 > /dev/ufsid/4e5bbe036b8b4567 /usr/SRC ufs ro,late,noatime= 0 =20 0 >=20 > # This are WinXP drives: > /dev/ada0s1 /mnt/win_c ntfs =20 rw,mountprog=3D/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 0 > /dev/ada0s5 /mnt/win_d ntfs =20 rw,mountprog=3D/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 0 > /dev/ada0s6 /mnt/win_e ntfs =20 rw,mountprog=3D/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 0 > -- >=20 >=20 > This yields kick, in a single user mode > -- > # This are WinXP drives: > /dev/ada0s1 /mnt/win_c ntfs =20 rw,mountprog=3D/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 0 > /dev/ada0s5 /mnt/win_d ntfs =20 rw,mountprog=3D/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 0 > /dev/ada0s6 /mnt/win_e ntfs =20 rw,mountprog=3D/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 0 >=20 > /dev/ufsid/4e5bbdf76b8b4567 /usr/DOC ufs rw,late 0 0 > /dev/ufsid/4e5bbe036b8b4567 /usr/SRC ufs ro,late,noatime= 0 =20 0 > -- >=20 > dmesg part: > -- > Mounting late file systems:NTFS signature is missing. > Failed to mount '/dev/ufsid/4e5bbdf76b8b4567': Invalid argument > The device '/dev/ufsid/4e5bbdf76b8b4567' doesn't seem to have a valid NTF= S. > Maybe the wrong device is used? Or the whole disk instead of a > partition (e.g. /dev/sda, not /dev/sda1)? Or the other way around? > NTFS signature is missing. > Failed to mount '/dev/ufsid/4e5bbe036b8b4567': Invalid argument > The device '/dev/ufsid/4e5bbe036b8b4567' doesn't seem to have a valid NTF= S. > Maybe the wrong device is used? Or the whole disk instead of a > partition (e.g. /dev/sda, not /dev/sda1)? Or the other way around? > . > Mounting /etc/fstab filesystems failed, startup aborted > ERROR: ABORTING BOOT (sending SIGTERM to parent)! > Aug 29 20:02:31 blackhole init: /bin/sh on /etc/rc terminated abnormally,= =20 going > to single user mode > Enter full pathname of shell or RETURN for /bin/sh: Hmm, seems like mountprog isn't being "cleared". Try this patch to=20 sbin/mount: Index: mount.c =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =2D-- mount.c (revision 225077) +++ mount.c (working copy) @@ -589,6 +589,9 @@ mountfs(const char *vfstype, const char *spec, con for (i =3D 1; i < mnt_argv.c; i++) (void)printf(" %s", mnt_argv.a[i]); (void)printf("\n"); + free(optbuf); + free(mountprog); + mountprog =3D NULL; return (0); } =20 @@ -599,6 +602,8 @@ mountfs(const char *vfstype, const char *spec, con } =20 free(optbuf); + free(mountprog); + mountprog =3D NULL; =20 if (verbose) { if (statfs(name, &sf) < 0) { > -- >=20 >=20 > Domagoj Smol=E8i=E6 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 =2D-=20 John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 12:27:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24183106564A for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:27:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D779F8FC14 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:27:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QyNPX-00019A-29 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:27:23 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:27:23 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:27:23 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:27:06 +0200 Lines: 11 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Thunderbird/3.1.6 X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: 9-beta1 installer - partition editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:27:26 -0000 Am I doing something wrong or the BETA1 installer cannot be used to manually create the partition scheme? 1) it doesn't accept "freebsd-swap" as partition type ("invalid argument") 2) it doesn't recognize that I have actually created a root (/) mount point; since it doesn't show mountpoints maybe it forgets the input from the dialog? The partition editor looks very rudimentary and feature-less. It really should show "space left" on the drive. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 15:05:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C00106564A; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:05:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from falkman@gamozo.org) Received: from fireblade.netcore2k.net (fireblade.netcore2k.net [92.48.127.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A128FC15; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:05:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fireblade.netcore2k.net with ESMTP id p7UEaFdJ019376 ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:36:16 +0100 Message-ID: <4E5CF577.7040600@gamozo.org> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 10:36:39 -0400 From: Brandon Falk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9-beta1 installer - partition editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:05:44 -0000 On 8/30/2011 8:27 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: > Am I doing something wrong or the BETA1 installer cannot be used to > manually create the partition scheme? > > 1) it doesn't accept "freebsd-swap" as partition type ("invalid > argument") > 2) it doesn't recognize that I have actually created a root (/) mount > point; since it doesn't show mountpoints maybe it forgets the input > from the dialog? > > The partition editor looks very rudimentary and feature-less. It > really should show "space left" on the drive. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > What is the rev you are using, as well as the arch? I've had no issues ever with partitioning (less the limitations of the partitioner) on numerous revs of 9, although all of my testing has been done on the exact same arch. I also use guided partitioning, and partition entire disk, then I go through and delete all the partitioning info, and start from scratch (why I do this, I have no clue). As for size left, that's something that really bothers me. I usually go through into command line, and use gpart to set up my system instead. I do not have BETA1 available right now on CD, but I do have BETA2 rev 225251. On this system I'm not able to replicate your issue (amd64). I know I'm using a newer rev, but I've been using 9 for a long time now, and I've yet to have an issue with the partitioner. As for your second question, where did you create the root mount point prior to the editor? Or was it still on the editor that you made it? -Brandon Falk From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 15:11:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED556106566C; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:11:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freebsd.org) Received: from argol.doit.wisc.edu (argol.doit.wisc.edu [144.92.197.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26CD8FC14; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:11:11 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Received: from avs-daemon.smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu by smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.05 32bit (built Jul 30 2009)) id <0LQQ00604VEM2K00@smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:11:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from comporellon.tachypleus.net (adsl-76-208-70-152.dsl.mdsnwi.sbcglobal.net [76.208.70.152]) by smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.05 32bit (built Jul 30 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0LQQ005NOVEI9H00@smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:11:06 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:11:05 -0500 From: Nathan Whitehorn In-reply-to: To: Ivan Voras Message-id: <4E5CEF79.7070508@freebsd.org> X-Spam-Report: AuthenticatedSender=yes, SenderIP=76.208.70.152 X-Spam-PmxInfo: Server=avs-13, Version=5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2011.8.30.135715, SenderIP=76.208.70.152 References: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110827 Thunderbird/6.0 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9-beta1 installer - partition editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:11:12 -0000 On 08/30/11 07:27, Ivan Voras wrote: > Am I doing something wrong or the BETA1 installer cannot be used to > manually create the partition scheme? > > 1) it doesn't accept "freebsd-swap" as partition type ("invalid > argument") > 2) it doesn't recognize that I have actually created a root (/) mount > point; since it doesn't show mountpoints maybe it forgets the input > from the dialog? > > The partition editor looks very rudimentary and feature-less. It > really should show "space left" on the drive. It does show mountpoints, and of course does support swap partitions. You can use the partition editor to create quite complicated multi-disk partition layouts over a variety of schemes, and in that way it is wildly more featureful than what was in sysinstall. Can you describe more what you were trying to do, in terms of what partition scheme you were using, etc.? The "invalid argument" is a message coming from the kernel, so something must be very wrong in your setup. -Nathan From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 00:00:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A756C1065670 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:00:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D368FC14 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QyYDt-0007xw-V9 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:00:05 +0200 Received: from cpe-188-129-116-21.dynamic.amis.hr ([188.129.116.21]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:00:05 +0200 Received: from ivoras by cpe-188-129-116-21.dynamic.amis.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:00:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 01:59:39 +0200 Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <4E5CF577.7040600@gamozo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpe-188-129-116-21.dynamic.amis.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 In-Reply-To: <4E5CF577.7040600@gamozo.org> Subject: Re: 9-beta1 installer - partition editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:00:07 -0000 On 30.8.2011. 16:36, Brandon Falk wrote: > On 8/30/2011 8:27 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: >> Am I doing something wrong or the BETA1 installer cannot be used to >> manually create the partition scheme? > I do not have BETA1 available right now on CD, but I do have BETA2 rev > 225251. On this system I'm not able to replicate your issue (amd64). I > know I'm using a newer rev, but I've been using 9 for a long time now, > and I've yet to have an issue with the partitioner. Ok, then it's probably fixed by now. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 00:08:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C70106564A for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:08:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1E08FC13 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QyYLf-0001w9-13 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:08:07 +0200 Received: from cpe-188-129-116-21.dynamic.amis.hr ([188.129.116.21]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:08:07 +0200 Received: from ivoras by cpe-188-129-116-21.dynamic.amis.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:08:07 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:07:40 +0200 Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: <4E5CEF79.7070508@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpe-188-129-116-21.dynamic.amis.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 In-Reply-To: <4E5CEF79.7070508@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 9-beta1 installer - partition editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:08:09 -0000 On 30.8.2011. 16:11, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 08/30/11 07:27, Ivan Voras wrote: >> Am I doing something wrong or the BETA1 installer cannot be used to >> manually create the partition scheme? >> >> 1) it doesn't accept "freebsd-swap" as partition type ("invalid >> argument") >> 2) it doesn't recognize that I have actually created a root (/) mount >> point; since it doesn't show mountpoints maybe it forgets the input >> from the dialog? >> >> The partition editor looks very rudimentary and feature-less. It >> really should show "space left" on the drive. > > It does show mountpoints, and of course does support swap partitions. > You can use the partition editor to create quite complicated multi-disk > partition layouts over a variety of schemes, and in that way it is > wildly more featureful than what was in sysinstall. > > Can you describe more what you were trying to do, in terms of what > partition scheme you were using, etc.? The "invalid argument" is a > message coming from the kernel, so something must be very wrong in your > setup. It was a plain install on a RAID volume which appears as ordinary da0 drive. I did do a couple of start-overs so it could be that some state got lost. It definitely did NOT show mount points in the dialog which lists newly created partitions. I'm sure you've looked around but just in case you missed it, here's how Ubuntu's text-mode installer looks like (note its partition editor): http://www.debianadmin.com/ubuntu-lamp-server-installation-with-screenshots.html From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 00:15:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832CA1065679 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:15:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E288FC0A for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:15:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QyYSR-0003sz-PC for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:15:07 +0200 Received: from cpe-188-129-116-21.dynamic.amis.hr ([188.129.116.21]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:15:07 +0200 Received: from ivoras by cpe-188-129-116-21.dynamic.amis.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:15:07 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:11:56 +0200 Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <201108291415.32605.jhb@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpe-188-129-116-21.dynamic.amis.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 In-Reply-To: <201108291415.32605.jhb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:15:10 -0000 On 29.8.2011. 20:15, John Baldwin wrote: > However, the SRAT code just ignores the table when it encounters an issue like > this, it doesn't hang. Something else later in the boot must have hung. Anyway... that machine can in its maximal configuration be populated with eight 10-core CPUs, i.e. 80 physical / 160 logical, so here's a vote from me to bump the shiny new cpuset infrastructure maximum CPU count to 256 before 9.0. http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/5U/5086/SYS-5086B-TRF.cfm From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 00:59:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4CA106566C; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:59:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.icecube.wisc.edu (trout.icecube.wisc.edu [128.104.255.119]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE378FC16; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:59:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.icecube.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942D2582D4; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:40:29 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at icecube.wisc.edu Received: from mail.icecube.wisc.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (trout.icecube.wisc.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id 5dDj1Cmvr9wn; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:40:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wanderer.tachypleus.net (adsl-76-208-70-152.dsl.mdsnwi.sbcglobal.net [76.208.70.152]) by mail.icecube.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42199582CB; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:40:29 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4E5D82FC.2020909@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:40:28 -0500 From: Nathan Whitehorn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: <4E5CEF79.7070508@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9-beta1 installer - partition editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:59:08 -0000 On 08/30/11 19:07, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 30.8.2011. 16:11, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >> On 08/30/11 07:27, Ivan Voras wrote: >>> Am I doing something wrong or the BETA1 installer cannot be used to >>> manually create the partition scheme? >>> >>> 1) it doesn't accept "freebsd-swap" as partition type ("invalid >>> argument") >>> 2) it doesn't recognize that I have actually created a root (/) mount >>> point; since it doesn't show mountpoints maybe it forgets the input >>> from the dialog? >>> >>> The partition editor looks very rudimentary and feature-less. It >>> really should show "space left" on the drive. >> >> It does show mountpoints, and of course does support swap partitions. >> You can use the partition editor to create quite complicated multi-disk >> partition layouts over a variety of schemes, and in that way it is >> wildly more featureful than what was in sysinstall. >> >> Can you describe more what you were trying to do, in terms of what >> partition scheme you were using, etc.? The "invalid argument" is a >> message coming from the kernel, so something must be very wrong in your >> setup. > > It was a plain install on a RAID volume which appears as ordinary da0 > drive. I did do a couple of start-overs so it could be that some state > got lost. It definitely did NOT show mount points in the dialog which > lists newly created partitions. > Which partitioning scheme did you use? How did you lay out the partitions? -Nathan From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 06:43:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9063E106564A for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 06:43:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ae@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04375154882 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 06:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E5DD7E3.8020200@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:42:43 +0400 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110429 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=10C8A17A Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigBEE52BF074D1C7DDB43982DB" Subject: Re: 9-beta1 installer - partition editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 06:43:31 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigBEE52BF074D1C7DDB43982DB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 30.08.2011 16:27, Ivan Voras wrote: > Am I doing something wrong or the BETA1 installer cannot be used to > manually create the partition scheme? >=20 > 1) it doesn't accept "freebsd-swap" as partition type ("invalid argumen= t") Not all partitioning schemes supports "freebsd-swap" partition type. E.g. MBR does not support it. --=20 WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov --------------enigBEE52BF074D1C7DDB43982DB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOXdfoAAoJEAHF6gQQyKF67jEH/2bjmRSq+UorfsRAuQYOFfpD AlQ1de4hnBmq8GRTl/1I+geqewmdzmat8HG3Uzwgws27JwYXH5WWmb7XD4alq8m1 yQ3I+deJiX3GnNoIeOLBSwTPxkUABASgEi31/vrWoRmXpYjeg44fJdPki7FAAkPv iUuw9AT51biIxgwsf4MT1RE9lJAjiGXoMHpQWKvW3ORT3SzTkK1WuxPYCBExxxm5 PoEsMjrzbPG5xQLymFrDMra5pZXSXasoy/21jXO77bpj/jBMnyTf0pJQrjfCgyi9 n8FE/aS1+KoKZ1Z3/jibRyChnfXOGcQcd4HG7kIGMfEPVnYmXgpHaU3YpjobuJ0= =WPdg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigBEE52BF074D1C7DDB43982DB-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 10:16:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE17E1065673 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:16:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230978FC17 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QyhqL-0000e9-8J for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:16:25 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:16:25 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:16:25 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:16:13 +0200 Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <4E5DD7E3.8020200@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: <4E5DD7E3.8020200@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: Re: 9-beta1 installer - partition editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:16:29 -0000 On 31/08/2011 08:42, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > On 30.08.2011 16:27, Ivan Voras wrote: >> Am I doing something wrong or the BETA1 installer cannot be used to >> manually create the partition scheme? >> >> 1) it doesn't accept "freebsd-swap" as partition type ("invalid argument") > > Not all partitioning schemes supports "freebsd-swap" partition type. > E.g. MBR does not support it. This could very well be the cause of my problems! The dialog should definitely not include suggestions to create "freebsd-swap" partitions if the partitioning scheme does not support it. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 10:20:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37D3106572C for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:20:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9648F8FC15 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:20:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qyhtw-00022o-3m for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:20:08 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:20:08 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:20:08 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:19:27 +0200 Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <4E5CEF79.7070508@freebsd.org> <4E5D82FC.2020909@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: <4E5D82FC.2020909@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: Re: 9-beta1 installer - partition editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:20:15 -0000 On 31/08/2011 02:40, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 08/30/11 19:07, Ivan Voras wrote: >> It was a plain install on a RAID volume which appears as ordinary da0 >> drive. I did do a couple of start-overs so it could be that some state >> got lost. It definitely did NOT show mount points in the dialog which >> lists newly created partitions. >> > > Which partitioning scheme did you use? How did you lay out the partitions? I did not deviate from defaults until the partition editor, where I deleted existing partitions (Linux) and tried to create new ones. So, it's a MBR scheme, and I intended to create three partitions, for "/", for "/srv" and a swap partition. I think Andrey's idea about what went wrong with the swap partition is most probably correct, so this only leaves the inability to register mount points with the partitions. However, if as Brandon suggested this is already fixed, don't bother. I'll try the BETA2 when ISOs become available and will post screenshots (IPMI) if it fails again. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 12:45:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310021065701; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:45:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.icecube.wisc.edu (trout.icecube.wisc.edu [128.104.255.119]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95DE8FC0C; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:45:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.icecube.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3E8582DB; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:45:55 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at icecube.wisc.edu Received: from mail.icecube.wisc.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (trout.icecube.wisc.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id Hp2gPuwECnEA; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:45:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wanderer.tachypleus.net (adsl-76-208-70-152.dsl.mdsnwi.sbcglobal.net [76.208.70.152]) by mail.icecube.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A992F582D9; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:45:54 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4E5E2D01.3000400@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:45:53 -0500 From: Nathan Whitehorn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: <4E5CEF79.7070508@freebsd.org> <4E5D82FC.2020909@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9-beta1 installer - partition editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:45:56 -0000 On 08/31/11 05:19, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 31/08/2011 02:40, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >> On 08/30/11 19:07, Ivan Voras wrote: > > >>> It was a plain install on a RAID volume which appears as ordinary da0 >>> drive. I did do a couple of start-overs so it could be that some state >>> got lost. It definitely did NOT show mount points in the dialog which >>> lists newly created partitions. >>> >> >> Which partitioning scheme did you use? How did you lay out the >> partitions? > > I did not deviate from defaults until the partition editor, where I > deleted existing partitions (Linux) and tried to create new ones. > > So, it's a MBR scheme, and I intended to create three partitions, for > "/", for "/srv" and a swap partition. I think Andrey's idea about what > went wrong with the swap partition is most probably correct, so this > only leaves the inability to register mount points with the partitions. > > However, if as Brandon suggested this is already fixed, don't bother. > I'll try the BETA2 when ISOs become available and will post screenshots > (IPMI) if it fails again. > The help text for straight MBR partitioning (which has never worked for FreeBSD) has been modified for BETA2 to suggest "freebsd" (which has always been the default) instead of "freebsd-ufs" etc. It does let you set mountpoints, and displays them, and always has, but not for bsdlabel container partitions (MBR type "freebsd"), since they aren't filesystems. Is this what you were trying to do? -Nathan From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 13:29:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F7E1065686 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:29:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218558FC08 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:29:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so70935gwb.13 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 06:29:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=xAo9+c/7oMq2A+7XgDdl/niAP4q4M3PqgaHVwhAd5Eo=; b=YTCIIpXNJPjOYhJg/FURecRkrkDz/HbdqS96nTN0a/vauZxAv4WiSOtZVRgEd9eCKq N3g6AgDxkLalxj/MIH4Dh8BceMP3rexJg/GmGZTvnZTlGjfBMC0IcuZcpYQLOBvJHQ5K avnC6IvhW8OY/ctufPX8oGPUPksmOKP1yvLmY= Received: by 10.101.180.19 with SMTP id h19mr308543anp.51.1314797354257; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 06:29:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: ivoras@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.123.18 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 06:28:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E5E2D01.3000400@freebsd.org> References: <4E5CEF79.7070508@freebsd.org> <4E5D82FC.2020909@freebsd.org> <4E5E2D01.3000400@freebsd.org> From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:28:34 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8UK_nmvVsJQPZhalQjxURa4FZJc Message-ID: To: Nathan Whitehorn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9-beta1 installer - partition editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:29:15 -0000 On 31 August 2011 14:45, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > It does let you set mountpoints, and displays them, and always has, but not > for bsdlabel container partitions (MBR type "freebsd"), since they aren't > filesystems. Is this what you were trying to do? Very probably - it was unclear to me that it still keeps the old slice-partition division but reverses the names. But, look at the screenshots here and see what went wrong: http://ivoras.imgur.com/installer__partitioner If it is as you say, then the dialog where I entered "/" and "/srv" should definitely NOT have that field on it. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 13:35:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F43106564A; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:35:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.icecube.wisc.edu (trout.icecube.wisc.edu [128.104.255.119]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7338FC08; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.icecube.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266CF582E6; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:35:18 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at icecube.wisc.edu Received: from mail.icecube.wisc.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (trout.icecube.wisc.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id VhFOqAcpYria; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:35:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wanderer.tachypleus.net (adsl-76-208-70-152.dsl.mdsnwi.sbcglobal.net [76.208.70.152]) by mail.icecube.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE4F582E4; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:35:17 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4E5E3895.4090400@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:35:17 -0500 From: Nathan Whitehorn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: <4E5CEF79.7070508@freebsd.org> <4E5D82FC.2020909@freebsd.org> <4E5E2D01.3000400@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9-beta1 installer - partition editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:35:18 -0000 On 08/31/11 08:28, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 31 August 2011 14:45, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > >> It does let you set mountpoints, and displays them, and always has, but not >> for bsdlabel container partitions (MBR type "freebsd"), since they aren't >> filesystems. Is this what you were trying to do? > > Very probably - it was unclear to me that it still keeps the old > slice-partition division but reverses the names. But, look at the > screenshots here and see what went wrong: > > http://ivoras.imgur.com/installer__partitioner OK, that's exactly what happened. It also doesn't reverse the names -- it just drops the term "slice" completely. > If it is as you say, then the dialog where I entered "/" and "/srv" > should definitely NOT have that field on it. Well, no. It only applies to bsdlabel containers. For instance, were I to want to mount an ext2 or fat32 partition directly under MBR, which the installer can do (and create, in the case of fat32), the mountpoint field is very important. What we *can* do is add a check that rejects mountpoints for partitions of type "freebsd". I'll see if I can code that up; it's too late for BETA2, however. -Nathan From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 13:53:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40459106566C; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:53:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yi0-f54.google.com (mail-yi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB888FC15; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yib19 with SMTP id 19so722725yib.13 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 06:53:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=fucVPJrXFSs4Ez2k0EXzcwYbA7YJiSohXPOSzE2DPdo=; b=ixylOaO0d80MEv+9Tlr7p9umQR7ggG5DW2X0IP5hy/PC4HksXhke98xZ7yS6I0rC4D w4eBwpFA3QHFpnSY6mOcvpWGQaaush0feR6cD13zSIXQJayWRLeAC5uSHqL1YoA0yVuO 8rNkR/AbHuF/wKwmmC/Ie8ze0EQRkC9Osvyeo= Received: by 10.101.82.13 with SMTP id j13mr329021anl.73.1314798793140; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 06:53:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: ivoras@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.123.18 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 06:52:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E5E3895.4090400@freebsd.org> References: <4E5CEF79.7070508@freebsd.org> <4E5D82FC.2020909@freebsd.org> <4E5E2D01.3000400@freebsd.org> <4E5E3895.4090400@freebsd.org> From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:52:33 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Pd65BLizsFoGET8e4e0AcFJ1SQI Message-ID: To: Nathan Whitehorn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9-beta1 installer - partition editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:53:14 -0000 On 31 August 2011 15:35, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 08/31/11 08:28, Ivan Voras wrote: >> If it is as you say, then the dialog where I entered "/" and "/srv" >> should definitely NOT have that field on it. > > Well, no. It only applies to bsdlabel containers. For instance, were I to > want to mount an ext2 or fat32 partition directly under MBR, which the > installer can do (and create, in the case of fat32), the mountpoint field is > very important. What we *can* do is add a check that rejects mountpoints for > partitions of type "freebsd". I'll see if I can code that up; it's too late > for BETA2, however. As you probably know, nothing precludes users to create UFS (or any other file system) directly under the MBR partition or the disk itself, so in fact what I showed in the screenshots should have been a valid operation. I think the dialogs are confusing, especially for users not used to the FreeBSD way of doing things. How about these *minimal* changes to the partition editor: 1) Before the partition editor starts, show an informational dialog box describing in short (one screen, no scrolling) that they can choose to either use a "normal" partitioning scheme like Linux, Windows and others and just create simple partitions or they can go the weird BSD way and create nested partitions (i.e. disklabels under a MBR partition). 2) Have a helpful message / line in the partition editor saying that if a "freebsd"-type partition is created without a mountpoint specified, the editor will allow creating second-level bsdlabel under them. I am very much trying to emphasize that any assumption that users will know these two pieces of information before they use the installer will only cause them to fill the mailing lists with bug reports such as mine or worse - just silently give up. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 14:20:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABB8106564A for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:20:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from falkman@gamozo.org) Received: from fireblade.netcore2k.net (fireblade.netcore2k.net [92.48.127.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7198FC08 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:20:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fireblade.netcore2k.net with ESMTP id p7VEKKco023962 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:20:21 +0100 Message-ID: <4E5E433C.80007@gamozo.org> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:20:44 -0400 From: Brandon Falk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <4E5E42F4.4010401@gamozo.org> In-Reply-To: <4E5E42F4.4010401@gamozo.org> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <4E5E42F4.4010401@gamozo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: 9-beta1 installer - partition editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:20:22 -0000 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: 9-beta1 installer - partition editor Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:19:32 -0400 From: Brandon Falk To: Ivan Voras On 8/31/2011 6:19 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 31/08/2011 02:40, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >> On 08/30/11 19:07, Ivan Voras wrote: > > >>> It was a plain install on a RAID volume which appears as ordinary da0 >>> drive. I did do a couple of start-overs so it could be that some state >>> got lost. It definitely did NOT show mount points in the dialog which >>> lists newly created partitions. >>> >> >> Which partitioning scheme did you use? How did you lay out the >> partitions? > > I did not deviate from defaults until the partition editor, where I > deleted existing partitions (Linux) and tried to create new ones. > > So, it's a MBR scheme, and I intended to create three partitions, for > "/", for "/srv" and a swap partition. I think Andrey's idea about what > went wrong with the swap partition is most probably correct, so this > only leaves the inability to register mount points with the partitions. > > However, if as Brandon suggested this is already fixed, don't bother. > I'll try the BETA2 when ISOs become available and will post > screenshots (IPMI) if it fails again. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Sorry, I was using GPT, so that could be why my results differed. -Brandon Falk From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 19:19:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1001065674 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:19:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seanbru@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com [69.147.107.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CF88FC12 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (rideseveral.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.160.231]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id p7VJIhad097285; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:18:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1314818323; bh=2gtTYXsnsj4p8+XhYpracvoAcDaQtoI+2lMO418RgCY=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-ID:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=NUtTtHz/7+16ktOJrr5Mr2gW63ns9PkHpnSQSvsNVw1VS5kZJqhLzCR1F0oonlPav xXoyayUnUbkzIA/B0tbOUvCzKqHUL/9oRIrdL32gjYoupJ5QJ/8nO0p7xRg3nffeT0 IiXz/mazS7dry1y9Vaf2Xdw4kAxRy8BgmxUjI8SY= From: Sean Bruno To: Ivan Voras In-Reply-To: References: <201108291415.32605.jhb@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:18:42 -0700 Message-ID: <1314818323.2610.6.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 (2.32.2-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:19:07 -0000 On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 17:11 -0700, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 29.8.2011. 20:15, John Baldwin wrote: > > > However, the SRAT code just ignores the table when it encounters an issue like > > this, it doesn't hang. Something else later in the boot must have hung. > > Anyway... that machine can in its maximal configuration be populated > with eight 10-core CPUs, i.e. 80 physical / 160 logical, so here's a > vote from me to bump the shiny new cpuset infrastructure maximum CPU > count to 256 before 9.0. > > http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/5U/5086/SYS-5086B-TRF.cfm Doesn't that (MAXCPU) seriously impact VM usage, lock contention etc ... ? I mean, if we have 2 cpus in a machine, but MAXCPU is set to 256, there is a bunch of "lost" memory and higher levels of lock contention? I thought that attilio was taking a stab at enhancing this, but at the current time anything more than a value of 64 for MAXCPU is kind of a "caveat emptor" area of FreeBSD. Sean P.S. I say 64 as yahoo has been running 64 cpus with local patches for a while, so I know that this works fairly well. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 12:41:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A642106564A for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 12:41:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk) Received: from mail.tdx.com (mail.tdx.com [62.13.128.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906668FC0A for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 12:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from HexaDeca64.dmpriest.net.uk (HPQuadro64.dmpriest.net.uk [62.13.130.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.tdx.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Kp) with ESMTP id p81CSvov085107 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:28:57 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:28:37 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <076DA148E8CBB414C3CC3DEB@HexaDeca64.dmpriest.net.uk> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Using underlying adX devices as well as ar0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:41:32 -0000 Hi, I posted this question in -Questions about a week ago, and didn't get any replies :( I'm just trying to check - we have a number of 8.2-STABLE amd64 systems where the onboard RAID shows up as '/dev/ar0' (which we use for filesystems, i.e. /dev/ar0s1d et'al), and the underlying devices for that RAID1 array show up as '/dev/ad12', '/dev/ad14'. Is it OK to run smartmontools / smartd / smartctl against the underlying adX devices, whilst ar0 is in use? I can't see anywhere that seems to indicate it's bad - and I can't seem to find anywhere that seems to say it's Ok... Thanks, -Karl From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 12:46:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435141065674 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 12:46:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from mwi1.coffeenet.org (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBE88FC15 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 12:46:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=wo5JMCRUeOvUgx91oLFlhGn50gMt86bkpvMf0I6VfNI=; b=sSn9BUO5xaoGTstar7/fqTCPqLyqpbRzSLaH0zRj9GLFPNv6mxKNtCaYeqrc1S2DMAJMqPpbVvHZZTYstWFPy1KuvO/EoZZcEehg8zpKNjz/EUeWZ7crGWTEExxviH31; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by mwi1.coffeenet.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Qz6iI-000FVH-Ir for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 07:49:47 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.3) with esmtpsa id 1314881379-1948-1947/4/11; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 12:49:39 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <076DA148E8CBB414C3CC3DEB@HexaDeca64.dmpriest.net.uk> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 07:45:57 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <076DA148E8CBB414C3CC3DEB@HexaDeca64.dmpriest.net.uk> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.0 Subject: Re: Using underlying adX devices as well as ar0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:46:06 -0000 On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 07:28:37 -0500, Karl Pielorz wrote: > Is it OK to run smartmontools / smartd / smartctl against the underlying > adX devices, whilst ar0 is in use? Yes. :-) From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 13:17:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289C4106566B for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:17:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rank1seeker@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E8C8FC08 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:17:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so892825fxe.13 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 06:17:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:subject:date:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer; bh=hbS3OkksedLQcGc9mNY9AiA5eNB1yeDvIbxAbTItsxM=; b=Wr/t49p341SxFsoSXfBq6ItLNK/+JvjCBl6NU8h6JTDlP869Wi6PtffUiJxsaRkbwC M4g1OpywMnybM9m+Zamlj5n1/7LgrWyjMVpFV3lmjaqj3oRix0YIiD72pRjcUUCzvAyi +Malhn2PkCDgEJAaEBlplKUJOtgw8nWpe3lvg= Received: by 10.223.101.90 with SMTP id b26mr346138fao.15.1314883063617; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 06:17:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DEV ([82.193.208.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y21sm28095faj.23.2011.09.01.06.17.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 01 Sep 2011 06:17:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20110901.131731.343.1@DEV> From: rank1seeker@gmail.com To: hackers@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:17:31 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: POP Peeper (3.8.0.0) Cc: Subject: 8.2R i386 bassed md root, doesn't like all machines X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:17:45 -0000 Works excellent!=0D=0AI boot it from USB stick.=0D=0A=0D=0ANow I added ~150 = MB of ports to it.=0D=0AFrom that point on, it doesn't boot on all = machines.=0D=0A=0D=0ABooting 2 times in a row on laptop with 4 gb = ram:=0D=0Ahttp://www.starforce.biz/md_root_1.jpg=0D=0Ahttp://www.starforce.biz/md_root_2.jpg=0D=0A=0D=0AWithout = ports, it did booted fine!=0D=0A=0D=0AThen I plug it in desktop with 2 GB = of ram and booted it and it works!=0D=0AI've did it again, just to be = sure.=0D=0A=0D=0ABack to my laptop and same fail = again.=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0ADomagoj Smol=E8i=E6 From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 14:11:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0781065740 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:11:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asmrookie@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7E38FC25 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:11:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwe5 with SMTP id 5so1234971wwe.1 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 07:11:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9avCe1ovYV8z3XzSDWXE098ME9LFiGyjdes3Zw3DYSk=; b=BTR6LfHSKoDwy8S5YI/wurvZQSZyH9eoOybo8Jt9xNjZqDLsE9E5TwZyHJcpu019R5 69aCpn2vzQp6ELdP3GQAqVHgoROpEluH2Je6cMv8zRMarxlHcoVK1rtiLHFmcSDVd8g+ mOB6qtVKM0+fnapP7TZHfCr32twzsZ0jVpoBs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.3.2 with SMTP id 2mr1733744wbl.4.1314886315818; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 07:11:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: asmrookie@gmail.com Received: by 10.227.206.139 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 07:11:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1314818323.2610.6.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> References: <201108291415.32605.jhb@freebsd.org> <1314818323.2610.6.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:11:55 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2l1GKAvuU0kOMOgeOARF3QhuIf4 Message-ID: From: Attilio Rao To: Sean Bruno Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , Ivan Voras Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:11:57 -0000 2011/8/31 Sean Bruno : > On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 17:11 -0700, Ivan Voras wrote: >> On 29.8.2011. 20:15, John Baldwin wrote: >> >> > However, the SRAT code just ignores the table when it encounters an is= sue like >> > this, it doesn't hang. =C2=A0Something else later in the boot must hav= e hung. >> >> Anyway... that machine can in its maximal configuration be populated >> with eight 10-core CPUs, i.e. 80 physical / 160 logical, so here's a >> vote from me to bump the shiny new cpuset infrastructure maximum CPU >> count to 256 before 9.0. >> >> http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/5U/5086/SYS-5086B-TRF.cfm > > Doesn't that (MAXCPU) seriously impact VM usage, lock contention > etc ... ? > > I mean, if we have 2 cpus in a machine, but MAXCPU is set to 256, there > is a bunch of "lost" memory and higher levels of lock contention? > > I thought that attilio was taking a stab at enhancing this, but at the > current time anything more than a value of 64 for MAXCPU is kind of a > "caveat emptor" area of FreeBSD. With newest current you can redefine MAXCPU in your kernel config, so you don't need to bump the default value. I think 64 as default value is good enough. Removing MAXCPU dependency from the KBI is an important project someone should adopt and bring to conclusion. Thanks, Attilio --=20 Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 14:18:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C393106566C for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:18:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marktinguely@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4C68FC0C for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:18:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxn22 with SMTP id 22so493589yxn.13 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 07:18:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sqPGDY+oVUfOh84Rjq5z4lz1daUZQkUJlrUdDf+ODGU=; b=Kgq4MWNmknjubjR1ghio8vX2E6QKXJkMr5w/ao5ApxXmPgoPgNFRBqoDELxKZuAOZd UrKyZS7w5pYEZcfwz65aaVHVD2F74SknBIMuNqmSG7R/2ZSogyLGf60JO5B7S91zDslK WtByBvvAdwGqff84XRwnX1OBenN3Z9XCUx34o= Received: by 10.42.189.69 with SMTP id dd5mr204278icb.152.1314885275251; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 06:54:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.111] ([206.188.254.192]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h3sm64410icx.9.2011.09.01.06.54.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 01 Sep 2011 06:54:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E5F8E91.3060206@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 08:54:25 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rank1seeker@gmail.com References: <20110901.131731.343.1@DEV> In-Reply-To: <20110901.131731.343.1@DEV> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.2R i386 bassed md root, doesn't like all machines X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:18:42 -0000 On 9/1/2011 8:17 AM, rank1seeker@gmail.com wrote: > Works excellent! > I boot it from USB stick. > > Now I added ~150 MB of ports to it. > From that point on, it doesn't boot on all machines. > > Booting 2 times in a row on laptop with 4 gb ram: > http://www.starforce.biz/md_root_1.jpg > http://www.starforce.biz/md_root_2.jpg > > Without ports, it did booted fine! > > Then I plug it in desktop with 2 GB of ram and booted it and it works! > I've did it again, just to be sure. > > Back to my laptop and same fail again. > > > Domagoj Smolèiæ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > This must be a 32 bit i386 kernel. From the vm_thread_new() error messages, your kernel virtual memory map is depleted. The OS uses KVA for a physical page attribute table. Therefore the 4GB machine will use more KVA than a 2GB. Apparently this difference is a enough to cause you problems. Either increase your KVA (KVA_PAGES setting in your kernel configuration file; see sys/i386/include/pmap.h look for values) or decrease your KVA use (memory drive?). --Mark From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 14:53:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F47106564A for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:53:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk) Received: from mail.tdx.com (mail.tdx.com [62.13.128.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771808FC16 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:53:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from HexaDeca64.dmpriest.net.uk (HPQuadro64.dmpriest.net.uk [62.13.130.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.tdx.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Kp) with ESMTP id p81ErOVq000260 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:53:24 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:53:00 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz To: Mark Felder , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <5F7DD9B483D9D9B0EE93A881@HexaDeca64.dmpriest.net.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <076DA148E8CBB414C3CC3DEB@HexaDeca64.dmpriest.net.uk> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: Using underlying adX devices as well as ar0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:53:49 -0000 --On 01 September 2011 07:45 -0500 Mark Felder wrote: >> Is it OK to run smartmontools / smartd / smartctl against the underlying >> adX devices, whilst ar0 is in use? > > Yes. :-) Thanks :-) I'll look for other reasons why one of the machines mysteriously locked up with everything hung in 'ufs' [you can see why I asked now! :)] -Karl From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 14:59:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F0D7106566B; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:59:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB91A8FC14; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywo32 with SMTP id 32so1838439ywo.13 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 07:59:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=MCh8OfYfFkYYRI9fr6pSZZ+V+ZfdK+Ye9wEXe6p+e9c=; b=LCt5GNxbwazmJvpWKX0Wb0m9c/OWjmHUPHRCtEU2G3Wz1RBNf1XdGA93mq4jCK8wAY tx7LJc0+51xumNsWrIeNjIu9QrvWJcxFZyDuwqGX4lbio0hhRZ+64uoxTC8G2AKwihfA a1Vzf23hGvPcOW8M8ztyYvstZcUykmHBZU2TQ= Received: by 10.101.5.21 with SMTP id h21mr300663ani.123.1314889151163; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 07:59:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: ivoras@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.134.4 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 07:58:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201108291415.32605.jhb@freebsd.org> <1314818323.2610.6.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:58:31 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: TH08ThmvnU5Jq1-Xkz_0YCHQHr0 Message-ID: To: Attilio Rao Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , Sean Bruno Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:59:12 -0000 On 1 September 2011 16:11, Attilio Rao wrote: >> I mean, if we have 2 cpus in a machine, but MAXCPU is set to 256, there >> is a bunch of "lost" memory and higher levels of lock contention? >> >> I thought that attilio was taking a stab at enhancing this, but at the >> current time anything more than a value of 64 for MAXCPU is kind of a >> "caveat emptor" area of FreeBSD. > > With newest current you can redefine MAXCPU in your kernel config, so > you don't need to bump the default value. > I think 64 as default value is good enough. > > Removing MAXCPU dependency from the KBI is an important project > someone should adopt and bring to conclusion. That's certainly one half of it and thanks for the work, but the real question in this thread is what Sean asked: what are the negative side-effects of simply bumping MAXCPU to 256 by default? AFAIK, there are not that many structures which are statically sized by MAXCMPU and most use the runtime-detected smp_cpus? From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 15:48:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA040106566B for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:48:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rank1seeker@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 106FF8FC08 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so1060363fxe.13 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 08:48:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:subject:date:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer; bh=1cXWD8sgs3QFcADs6+xqm2V/sLjXGo8MsYRiODECrBI=; b=tw/+pkpjv+hrnK843grvL2zQdQ+H3XLDo9rWpiITLAgV+sMfD9wRPoF02MRcXx714v Hz3tXrBeBHo+vl4a/6kcPrqUjclXXAFcLlHP9DVFAneIgbi2n9CRKvTOFJyp7s0PQEso no6p6kCa7M1aH094i+snctSzGgvICQFBrj/YE= Received: by 10.223.24.21 with SMTP id t21mr8653fab.24.1314892087982; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 08:48:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DEV ([82.193.208.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c4sm133698fac.11.2011.09.01.08.48.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 01 Sep 2011 08:48:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20110901.154750.578.2@DEV> From: rank1seeker@gmail.com To: hackers@freebsd.org, "John Baldwin" Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:47:50 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <201108300824.01387.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <20110829.180846.937.1@DEV> <201108300824.01387.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: POP Peeper (3.8.0.0) Cc: Subject: Re: BUG: Entries in fstab with 'late' option, require order, with ntfs and ufs X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:48:09 -0000 ----- Original Message -----=0D=0AFrom: John Baldwin = =0D=0ATo: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org=0D=0ACc: = rank1seeker@gmail.com, Craig Rodrigues =0D=0ADate: = Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:24:01 -0400=0D=0ASubject: Re: BUG: Entries in fstab = with 'late' option, require order, with ntfs and ufs=0D=0A=0D=0A> On = Monday, August 29, 2011 2:08:46 pm rank1seeker@gmail.com wrote:=0D=0A> > = This yields successfull boot=0D=0A> > --=0D=0A> > = /dev/ufsid/4e5bbdf76b8b4567 /usr/DOC ufs rw,late 0 = 0=0D=0A> > /dev/ufsid/4e5bbe036b8b4567 /usr/SRC ufs = ro,late,noatime 0 =0D=0A> 0=0D=0A> > =0D=0A> > # This are WinXP = drives:=0D=0A> > /dev/ada0s1 /mnt/win_c ntfs =0D=0A> = rw,mountprog=3D/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 0=0D=0A> > = /dev/ada0s5 /mnt/win_d ntfs =0D=0A> = rw,mountprog=3D/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 0=0D=0A> > = /dev/ada0s6 /mnt/win_e ntfs =0D=0A> = rw,mountprog=3D/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 0=0D=0A> > = --=0D=0A> > =0D=0A> > =0D=0A> > This yields kick, in a single user = mode=0D=0A> > --=0D=0A> > # This are WinXP drives:=0D=0A> > /dev/ada0s1 = /mnt/win_c ntfs =0D=0A> = rw,mountprog=3D/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 0=0D=0A> > = /dev/ada0s5 /mnt/win_d ntfs =0D=0A> = rw,mountprog=3D/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 0=0D=0A> > = /dev/ada0s6 /mnt/win_e ntfs =0D=0A> = rw,mountprog=3D/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g,late 0 0=0D=0A> > = =0D=0A> > /dev/ufsid/4e5bbdf76b8b4567 /usr/DOC ufs = rw,late 0 0=0D=0A> > /dev/ufsid/4e5bbe036b8b4567 /usr/SRC = ufs ro,late,noatime 0 =0D=0A> 0=0D=0A> > --=0D=0A> > =0D=0A> > dmesg = part:=0D=0A> > --=0D=0A> > Mounting late file systems:NTFS signature is = missing.=0D=0A> > Failed to mount '/dev/ufsid/4e5bbdf76b8b4567': Invalid = argument=0D=0A> > The device '/dev/ufsid/4e5bbdf76b8b4567' doesn't seem = to have a valid NTFS.=0D=0A> > Maybe the wrong device is used? Or the = whole disk instead of a=0D=0A> > partition (e.g. /dev/sda, not = /dev/sda1)? Or the other way around?=0D=0A> > NTFS signature is = missing.=0D=0A> > Failed to mount '/dev/ufsid/4e5bbe036b8b4567': Invalid = argument=0D=0A> > The device '/dev/ufsid/4e5bbe036b8b4567' doesn't seem = to have a valid NTFS.=0D=0A> > Maybe the wrong device is used? Or the = whole disk instead of a=0D=0A> > partition (e.g. /dev/sda, not = /dev/sda1)? Or the other way around?=0D=0A> > .=0D=0A> > Mounting = /etc/fstab filesystems failed, startup aborted=0D=0A> > ERROR: ABORTING = BOOT (sending SIGTERM to parent)!=0D=0A> > Aug 29 20:02:31 blackhole = init: /bin/sh on /etc/rc terminated abnormally, =0D=0A> going=0D=0A> > to = single user mode=0D=0A> > Enter full pathname of shell or RETURN for = /bin/sh:=0D=0A> =0D=0A> Hmm, seems like mountprog isn't being "cleared". = Try this patch to =0D=0A> sbin/mount:=0D=0A> =0D=0A> Index: = mount.c=0D=0A> = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=0D=0A> = --- mount.c (revision 225077)=0D=0A> +++ mount.c (working copy)=0D=0A> @@ = -589,6 +589,9 @@ mountfs(const char *vfstype, const char *spec, = con=0D=0A> for (i =3D 1; i < mnt_argv.c; i++)=0D=0A> = (void)printf(" %s", mnt_argv.a[i]);=0D=0A> (void)printf("\n");=0D=0A> = + free(optbuf);=0D=0A> + free(mountprog);=0D=0A> + mountprog =3D = NULL;=0D=0A> return (0);=0D=0A> }=0D=0A> =0D=0A> @@ -599,6 +602,8 = @@ mountfs(const char *vfstype, const char *spec, con=0D=0A> }=0D=0A> = =0D=0A> free(optbuf);=0D=0A> + free(mountprog);=0D=0A> + mountprog =3D = NULL;=0D=0A> =0D=0A> if (verbose) {=0D=0A> if (statfs(name, &sf) < = 0) {=0D=0A> =0D=0A> =0D=0A> =0D=0A> John Baldwin=0D=0A> = =0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0AI failed to apply your patch on 8.2 RELEASE = i386=0D=0A--=0D=0Acd /usr/src/sbin/mount=0D=0Apatch < = ~/mount_patch.diff=0D=0A--=0D=0APatch complained about line = 6=0D=0A=0D=0AAnyway, I've patched it manually and it works now!=0D=0AGood = job John ...=0D=0A;)=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0ADomagoj Smol=E8i=E6=0D=0A = =0D=0A From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 16:57:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E892106564A for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:57:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crmartin@sgi.com) Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.sgi.com [192.48.179.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFB18FC12 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:57:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from xmail.sgi.com (pv-excas3-dc21-nlb.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.207]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B4C304062 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 09:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.3.0.220] (10.3.0.220) by xmail.sgi.com (137.38.102.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.289.1; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 11:57:05 -0500 Message-ID: <4E5FB956.1020206@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:56:54 -0600 From: Charlie Martin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110805 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.3.0.220] Subject: kldload dtraceall exec format error X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:57:07 -0000 Okay, I'll grant this is probably a horrid noob question, but then on the Free kernel I'm a horrid noob so I guess it makes sense. This is for FreeBSD FreeBSD psmdev1 8.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 per uname -a. We have a FreeBSD based product on the AMD64 architecture; I'm trying to enable DTrace. The file amd64/conf/GENERIC with which the kernel was compiled has the required lines options KDTRACE_FRAME # Ensure frames are compiled in options KDTRACE_HOOKS # Kernel DTrace hooks options DDB_CTF # for DTrace but when I try kldload dtraceall I get kldload: can't load dtraceall: Exec format error From Google I get that this probably means some mismatch in compiles, but I'm unclear what to look for. Also, another big part of the product, compiled from the same master Makefile, *does* have dtrace enabled successfully. Hints, suggestions, and pointers to documentation gleefully accepted. -- Charles R. (Charlie) Martin Senior Software Engineer SGI logo 1900 Pike Road Longmont, CO 80501 Phone: 303-532-0209 E-Mail: CRMartin@sgi.com Website: www.sgi.com From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 17:22:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35671065670; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:22:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asmrookie@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A618FC08; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwe5 with SMTP id 5so1430731wwe.1 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:22:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=1y753kbTGsAQL94X6B5HzNupkkG/Gq0i5efPSLjFUOc=; b=r7/HRqiSPT2guGQv1RD430tr8/HJXWxMWW88kC8MkcgzITQX5SKSUwnwsTUpXLbjn1 rVhXG3+z035KAO5uybYYNdtpk4pZgzwLHhIrFEqhnMQHxEA/02/mRr/moSlC3gle9IWL GpI3rM93PMOFdIgJjwPwLcJSx9M9lkltQ7BP0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.28.70 with SMTP id l6mr95057wbc.34.1314897767048; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:22:47 -0700 (PDT) Sender: asmrookie@gmail.com Received: by 10.227.206.139 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:22:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201108291415.32605.jhb@freebsd.org> <1314818323.2610.6.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 19:22:47 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: AYs3JoteibTA095AEHTmBh0ZHSs Message-ID: From: Attilio Rao To: Ivan Voras Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , Sean Bruno Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:22:48 -0000 2011/9/1 Ivan Voras : > On 1 September 2011 16:11, Attilio Rao wrote: > >>> I mean, if we have 2 cpus in a machine, but MAXCPU is set to 256, there >>> is a bunch of "lost" memory and higher levels of lock contention? >>> >>> I thought that attilio was taking a stab at enhancing this, but at the >>> current time anything more than a value of 64 for MAXCPU is kind of a >>> "caveat emptor" area of FreeBSD. >> >> With newest current you can redefine MAXCPU in your kernel config, so >> you don't need to bump the default value. >> I think 64 as default value is good enough. >> >> Removing MAXCPU dependency from the KBI is an important project >> someone should adopt and bring to conclusion. > > That's certainly one half of it and thanks for the work, but the real > question in this thread is what Sean asked: what are the negative > side-effects of simply bumping MAXCPU to 256 by default? AFAIK, there > are not that many structures which are statically sized by MAXCMPU and > most use the runtime-detected smp_cpus? > Well, there are quite a few statically allocated, but as I said, making the kernel MAXCPU-agnostic (or sort of agnostic) is a goal and a good project. Thanks, Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 17:23:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F39106566C for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6048FC14 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:23:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so1442135qyk.13 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:23:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cSCbiHnFHBoqORtJUDWv+3gjN0oJDQeJgpaEway1gYI=; b=NoisNVgUcs0LxJPraAZnN67VB28wwkg7u6Gj4IZfCYG+GolOoRfrWKdmUoTaSljhBB fw8R3iPiLuLJWBy2S+fMlJpHfV08O12UVtGCcytKRtvcFSLJy1hDO8kfdyV3pn0kMqwE PSHIewjt53sa/zUaq7W2aDj/YnAwBKxlaVdFU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.180.136 with SMTP id bu8mr79968qab.142.1314897814294; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:23:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.37.83 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:23:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E5FB956.1020206@sgi.com> References: <4E5FB956.1020206@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:23:34 -0700 Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: Charlie Martin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kldload dtraceall exec format error X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:23:35 -0000 On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Charlie Martin wrote: > Okay, I'll grant this is probably a horrid noob question, but then on the > Free kernel I'm a horrid noob so I guess it makes sense. =A0This is for > FreeBSD > > FreeBSD psmdev1 8.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 > > per uname -a. > > We have a FreeBSD based product on the AMD64 architecture; I'm trying to > enable DTrace. =A0The file amd64/conf/GENERIC with which the kernel was > compiled has the required lines > > options =A0 =A0 KDTRACE_FRAME =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0# Ensure frames are compiled= in > options =A0 =A0 KDTRACE_HOOKS =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0# Kernel DTrace hooks > options =A0 =A0 DDB_CTF =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 # for DTrace > > but when I try kldload dtraceall I get > > kldload: can't load dtraceall: Exec format error > > From Google I get that this probably means some mismatch in compiles, but > I'm unclear what to look for. =A0Also, another big part of the product, > compiled from the same master Makefile, *does* have dtrace enabled > successfully. > > Hints, suggestions, and pointers to documentation gleefully accepted. What does dmesg say? Thanks, -Garrett From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 17:27:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F29E1065673 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:27:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crmartin@sgi.com) Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.sgi.com [192.48.179.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280438FC16 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from xmail.sgi.com (pv-excas3-dc21-nlb.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.207]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B260D304059; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:27:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.3.0.220] (10.3.0.220) by xmail.sgi.com (137.38.102.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.289.1; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 12:27:26 -0500 Message-ID: <4E5FC073.5000101@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 11:27:15 -0600 From: Charlie Martin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110805 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garrett Cooper References: <4E5FB956.1020206@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.3.0.220] Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kldload dtraceall exec format error X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:27:27 -0000 On 2011-09-01 11:23, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Charlie Martin wrote: >> Okay, I'll grant this is probably a horrid noob question, but then on the >> Free kernel I'm a horrid noob so I guess it makes sense. This is for >> FreeBSD >> >> FreeBSD psmdev1 8.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 >> >> per uname -a. >> >> We have a FreeBSD based product on the AMD64 architecture; I'm trying to >> enable DTrace. The file amd64/conf/GENERIC with which the kernel was >> compiled has the required lines >> >> options KDTRACE_FRAME # Ensure frames are compiled in >> options KDTRACE_HOOKS # Kernel DTrace hooks >> options DDB_CTF # for DTrace >> >> but when I try kldload dtraceall I get >> >> kldload: can't load dtraceall: Exec format error >> >> From Google I get that this probably means some mismatch in compiles, but >> I'm unclear what to look for. Also, another big part of the product, >> compiled from the same master Makefile, *does* have dtrace enabled >> successfully. >> >> Hints, suggestions, and pointers to documentation gleefully accepted. > What does dmesg say? > Thanks, > -Garrett > link_elf_obj: symbol lapic_cyclic_clock_func undefined linker_load_file: Unsupported file type KLD profile.ko: depends on cyclic - not available or version mismatch linker_load_file: Unsupported file type KLD dtraceall.ko: depends on profile - not available or version mismatch linker_load_file: Unsupported file type link_elf_obj: symbol lapic_cyclic_clock_func undefined linker_load_file: Unsupported file type KLD profile.ko: depends on cyclic - not available or version mismatch linker_load_file: Unsupported file type KLD dtraceall.ko: depends on profile - not available or version mismatch linker_load_file: Unsupported file type Aha, dmesg. Thanks. -- Charles R. (Charlie) Martin Senior Software Engineer SGI logo 1900 Pike Road Longmont, CO 80501 Phone: 303-532-0209 E-Mail: CRMartin@sgi.com Website: www.sgi.com From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 20:09:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C820106568B for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 20:09:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crmartin@sgi.com) Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.sgi.com [192.48.179.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4954B8FC1C for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 20:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from xmail.sgi.com (pv-excas3-dc21-nlb.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.207]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73DC8F8065; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:09:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.3.0.220] (10.3.0.220) by xmail.sgi.com (137.38.102.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.289.1; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:09:49 -0500 Message-ID: <4E5FE682.9020205@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:09:38 -0600 From: Charlie Martin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110805 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garrett Cooper References: <4E5FB956.1020206@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.3.0.220] Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kldload dtraceall exec format error X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 20:09:54 -0000 okay, dmesg begins to give a clue. Here's a question: if this FreeBSD 8 is being built on a FreeBSD 7 machine, would that account for it? On 2011-09-01 11:23, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Charlie Martin wrote: >> Okay, I'll grant this is probably a horrid noob question, but then on the >> Free kernel I'm a horrid noob so I guess it makes sense. This is for >> FreeBSD >> >> FreeBSD psmdev1 8.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 >> >> per uname -a. >> >> We have a FreeBSD based product on the AMD64 architecture; I'm trying to >> enable DTrace. The file amd64/conf/GENERIC with which the kernel was >> compiled has the required lines >> >> options KDTRACE_FRAME # Ensure frames are compiled in >> options KDTRACE_HOOKS # Kernel DTrace hooks >> options DDB_CTF # for DTrace >> >> but when I try kldload dtraceall I get >> >> kldload: can't load dtraceall: Exec format error >> >> From Google I get that this probably means some mismatch in compiles, but >> I'm unclear what to look for. Also, another big part of the product, >> compiled from the same master Makefile, *does* have dtrace enabled >> successfully. >> >> Hints, suggestions, and pointers to documentation gleefully accepted. > What does dmesg say? > Thanks, > -Garrett > -- Charles R. (Charlie) Martin Senior Software Engineer SGI logo 1900 Pike Road Longmont, CO 80501 Phone: 303-532-0209 E-Mail: CRMartin@sgi.com Website: www.sgi.com From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 20:28:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1D7106566C for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 20:28:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4FD8FC0C for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 20:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so418359qyk.13 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:28:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rb5wqeAJg/AY3XIZdTMsTK9aKOaILYuiXxHWGCFbYsE=; b=NkP/blBvysN2YhSmtTF0hfH540S2mCv5fCSOPkhK+dayFdMJymXo8labJsQtcH8vNf GcpcXnyv0Rhn4L7SqbbEIfJvFdL2k/umt2OhlHgqKXWKG0Ng3o3m1cLXux+ZKU2Sdvlv hbokg+aaZqQVfitaGe4cPkJZ4FPf9RfHz92Xs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.191.202 with SMTP id dn10mr254976qab.42.1314908885997; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:28:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.37.83 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:28:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E5FE682.9020205@sgi.com> References: <4E5FB956.1020206@sgi.com> <4E5FE682.9020205@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:28:05 -0700 Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: Charlie Martin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kldload dtraceall exec format error X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 20:28:06 -0000 On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Charlie Martin wrote: > okay, dmesg begins to give a clue. =A0Here's a question: if this FreeBSD = 8 is > being built on a FreeBSD 7 machine, would that account for it? The problem is that you only have built some -- not all -- of the modules required for dtraceall. HTH, -Garrett From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 2 01:04:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E701065670 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 01:04:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED86A8FC13 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 01:04:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyh15 with SMTP id 15so2417841wyh.13 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:04:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=R+rc+0LCsbV/L8F/zrtLm3d+4QhQ+RlcnKWcBrt6eY4=; b=m2W+z7T3UOjXuu1l3kmosSMvYR3YGYw036qgewzGSkVLQ0rPLJewsGIdaAIFiBIsDg RzXTjMB8fN5euyX054OK40Lx5Y/cM5y2xe2TNcKHRDKvNvfWV+zyarnLC3fjiTJJhUiD 5eQIzZNUuEWsa3OVMouOHneiI/9AaO4038eew= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.87.206 with SMTP id y56mr453627wee.6.1314925475232; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:04:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.74.5 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 18:04:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E5FC073.5000101@sgi.com> References: <4E5FB956.1020206@sgi.com> <4E5FC073.5000101@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 20:04:35 -0500 Message-ID: From: Brandon Gooch To: Charlie Martin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Garrett Cooper , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kldload dtraceall exec format error X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 01:04:37 -0000 On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Charlie Martin wrote: > > > On 2011-09-01 11:23, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Charlie Martin =A0wrot= e: >>> >>> Okay, I'll grant this is probably a horrid noob question, but then on t= he >>> Free kernel I'm a horrid noob so I guess it makes sense. =A0This is for >>> FreeBSD >>> >>> FreeBSD psmdev1 8.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 >>> >>> per uname -a. >>> >>> We have a FreeBSD based product on the AMD64 architecture; I'm trying t= o >>> enable DTrace. =A0The file amd64/conf/GENERIC with which the kernel was >>> compiled has the required lines >>> >>> options =A0 =A0 KDTRACE_FRAME =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0# Ensure frames are compil= ed in >>> options =A0 =A0 KDTRACE_HOOKS =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0# Kernel DTrace hooks >>> options =A0 =A0 DDB_CTF =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 # for DTrace >>> >>> but when I try kldload dtraceall I get >>> >>> kldload: can't load dtraceall: Exec format error >>> >>> =A0From Google I get that this probably means some mismatch in compiles= , >>> but >>> I'm unclear what to look for. =A0Also, another big part of the product, >>> compiled from the same master Makefile, *does* have dtrace enabled >>> successfully. >>> >>> Hints, suggestions, and pointers to documentation gleefully accepted. >> >> What does dmesg say? >> Thanks, >> -Garrett >> > link_elf_obj: symbol lapic_cyclic_clock_func undefined > linker_load_file: Unsupported file type > KLD profile.ko: depends on cyclic - not available or version mismatch > linker_load_file: Unsupported file type > KLD dtraceall.ko: depends on profile - not available or version mismatch > linker_load_file: Unsupported file type > link_elf_obj: symbol lapic_cyclic_clock_func undefined > linker_load_file: Unsupported file type > KLD profile.ko: depends on cyclic - not available or version mismatch > linker_load_file: Unsupported file type > KLD dtraceall.ko: depends on profile - not available or version mismatch > linker_load_file: Unsupported file type > > Aha, dmesg. =A0Thanks. > I'm guessing you've read this: http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace Make certain you've configure your kernel correctly, and that you've rebuilt your kernel and modules... -Brandon From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 2 14:22:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6FB106564A for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:22:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlpetz@internode.on.net) Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.141]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526388FC19 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:22:47 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAJLfYE55LH3F/2dsb2JhbAAoGqhkeYFNCAIdARIcGBgFBmIgEAEOAQQeBQuHWyOXLaBEhmUEm2uIYA Received: from ppp121-44-125-197.lns20.syd6.internode.on.net (HELO Minx) ([121.44.125.197]) by ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 02 Sep 2011 23:37:30 +0930 From: "Jarrod Lee Petz" To: Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 00:07:28 +1000 Message-ID: <007301cc6979$a690f9a0$f3b2ece0$@internode.on.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AcxpeEKFkWLUXoe+QOu0aKUpR9MsVA== Content-Language: en-au Subject: TIME_WAIT Assassination in FreeBSD??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: petz@nisshoko.net List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:22:48 -0000 Hi All, This is a repost (to mailing list) of my forum post here. http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=26075 All links to RFCs can be found in that forum post. Please excuse my lack of mailing list decorum or ASCII formatting (I am new here). In my day to day work I have just run into a particular issue. Given it is at the foundations of the TCP stack I am obviously out of my depth here. I would like to know if anyone can tell me. 1. The best or most correct solution to my problem (this is not a FreeBSD related question)? Do I need TIME_WAIT assassination? Or a better port randomisation algorithm? Is it a problem with the Windows OS? 2. Is this even a problem in the FTP stack? Is it just bad design in active mode FTP? Will other protocols be impacted (a big concern of mine)? 3. Does FreeBSD handle this situation? How? I can't seem to find much info on TIME_WAIT assassination in FreeBSD is mentioned in RFC 6056 MY PROBLEM -------------------------------------------------------------------------- We have an AIX system which performs a number of FTP (active mode) mget & mdelete operations against a Windows 2003 R2 SP2 x64 FTP server(IIS). This all worked fine until we upgraded the AIX system from 5.3 TL8 to 6.1 TL6. When we did this, FTP would now hang forever for no apparent reason. However we found that two things had happened which had caused this. The first item revealed the second (bug). 1. As of AIX 6.1 TL6 & AIX 7.1. Ephemeral port allocation by the TCP/IP stack is now random instead of linear (for security). See ---> "IBM IZ73313:TCP/IP VULNERABILITY PROTECTION PHASE 1" 2. AIX FTP implementation was busted. Fixes provided by IBM to retry operation for default 90 seconds on receipt of FTP response 425 & then continue on if it still gets no incoming connection on PORT provided to server. So now that we have the FTP fixes for item 2.(above). Everything works you ask? Well kind of. FTP no longer hangs which is good. But we still see problems when AIX decides to use the same Ephemeral in close succession. For example. Step 1. AIX client sends FTP server request for data connection on port 38672. Step 2. Windows FTP server opens data link to 38672, Does its business & closes the connections. This leaves the socket/port on AIX in the CLOSED state. However the windows server the port is held in TIME_WAIT state for 2MSL(default 120 minimum configurable 30). Step 3. AIX client sends FTP server another request for data connection on port 38672 (reusable as it was CLOSED). Windows server responds with 425 because the port cannot be used. It is still in TIME_WAIT and is likely going to stay in that state longer then 90 seconds (default period FTP is retying for). The only thing I can find that would seem to address this circumstance is "RFC1122 TCP TIME_WAIT Assassination" But it seems to have reported issues "RFC1337 TIME-WAIT Assassination Hazards in TCP" and here "IETF Internet Draft - Problems with TCP Connections Terminated by RSTs or Timer draft-heavens-problems-rsts-00.txt - Ian Heavens - July 1995" I'm not sure how keen IBM is to change their TCP stack for a small fry like me. They seem to be wanting me to just reduce the 2MSL on the windows side. But I don't like this because 1. I will still have a delay sometimes, from 0-30 seconds (minimum 2MSL for Windows OS). 2. I don't know if other protocols will be or are being impacted. This looks interesting too. "RFC 6056 - Recommendations for Transport-Protocol Port Randomization" I was initially thinking along the same lines, why go to the trouble of assassination if you can just avoid it. Perhaps the randomisation algorithm IBM are using could be better. I have no idea what they do though. I do know though that our server is not busy(heaps of free ports) and the ports seem to get re-used quickly!! Regards Jarrod From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 2 14:59:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922C2106564A for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:59:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from kabab.cs.huji.ac.il (kabab.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ECE98FC0C for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:59:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32] ident=danny) by kabab.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1QzVDY-0005cH-La for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:59:40 +0300 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:59:40 +0300 From: Daniel Braniss Message-ID: Subject: mini pci express - 3g modem X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:59:43 -0000 Hi, Just saw that PCEngines has a new board, with SIM socket, but to get it working, it needs a mimi pci express modem, and from http://www.pcengines.ch/alix6e1.htm 'On Alix, only USB 2.0 connectivity is supported' ... does this means the modem appears as a usb device? cheers, danny From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 2 16:55:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17451065672 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:55:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crmartin@sgi.com) Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.sgi.com [192.48.152.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886698FC17 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:55:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from xmail.sgi.com (pv-excas3-dc21.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.206]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0428AC009; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 09:55:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.3.0.220] (10.3.0.220) by xmail.sgi.com (137.38.102.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.289.1; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:55:53 -0500 Message-ID: <4E610A8F.4010908@sgi.com> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:55:43 -0600 From: Charlie Martin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110805 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brandon Gooch References: <4E5FB956.1020206@sgi.com> <4E5FC073.5000101@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.3.0.220] Cc: Garrett Cooper , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kldload dtraceall exec format error X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 16:55:55 -0000 Yeah, and the same overall Makefile is successfully building in dtrace on the other part of the product, which is actually using FreeBSD 7-something. I'm sure there's some tiny difference, but it would sure help to have some idea of what those dmesg messages are telling me. It's not that the .ko's are missing, I checked that first thing. On 2011-09-01 19:04, Brandon Gooch wrote: > I'm guessing you've read this: > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace > > Make certain you've configure your kernel correctly, and that you've > rebuilt your kernel and modules... > > -Brandon -- Charles R. (Charlie) Martin Senior Software Engineer SGI logo 1900 Pike Road Longmont, CO 80501 Phone: 303-532-0209 E-Mail: CRMartin@sgi.com Website: www.sgi.com From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 2 19:35:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6995106564A for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 19:35:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114298FC15 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 19:35:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id WAA22918; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 22:35:01 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1QzZW1-000EwF-14; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 22:35:01 +0300 Message-ID: <4E612FE4.7070507@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 22:35:00 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110901 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Charlie Martin References: <4E5FB956.1020206@sgi.com> <4E5FC073.5000101@sgi.com> <4E610A8F.4010908@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <4E610A8F.4010908@sgi.com> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Brandon Gooch , Garrett Cooper , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kldload dtraceall exec format error X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 19:35:09 -0000 on 02/09/2011 19:55 Charlie Martin said the following: > Yeah, and the same overall Makefile is successfully building in dtrace on the > other part of the product, which is actually using FreeBSD 7-something. I'm > sure there's some tiny difference, but it would sure help to have some idea of > what those dmesg messages are telling me. > > It's not that the .ko's are missing, I checked that first thing. The message was expressly telling you that your cyclic.ko and your kernel are out of sync - built from different sources. > On 2011-09-01 19:04, Brandon Gooch wrote: >> I'm guessing you've read this: >> >> http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace >> >> Make certain you've configure your kernel correctly, and that you've >> rebuilt your kernel and modules... >> >> -Brandon > -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 2 19:57:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF72106566B for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 19:57:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crmartin@sgi.com) Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.sgi.com [192.48.179.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2398FC13 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 19:57:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from xmail.sgi.com (pv-excas3-dc21-nlb.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.207]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902B5304062; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 12:57:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.3.0.220] (10.3.0.220) by xmail.sgi.com (137.38.102.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.289.1; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:57:49 -0500 Message-ID: <4E61353B.5070404@sgi.com> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 13:57:47 -0600 From: Charlie Martin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110805 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andriy Gapon References: <4E5FB956.1020206@sgi.com> <4E5FC073.5000101@sgi.com> <4E610A8F.4010908@sgi.com> <4E612FE4.7070507@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E612FE4.7070507@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.3.0.220] Cc: Brandon Gooch , Garrett Cooper , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kldload dtraceall exec format error X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 19:57:50 -0000 On 2011-09-02 13:35, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 02/09/2011 19:55 Charlie Martin said the following: >> Yeah, and the same overall Makefile is successfully building in dtrace on the >> other part of the product, which is actually using FreeBSD 7-something. I'm >> sure there's some tiny difference, but it would sure help to have some idea of >> what those dmesg messages are telling me. >> >> It's not that the .ko's are missing, I checked that first thing. > The message was expressly telling you that your cyclic.ko and your kernel are > out of sync - built from different sources. Thanks. Puzzling ... it *seems* to be the same sources. >> On 2011-09-01 19:04, Brandon Gooch wrote: >>> I'm guessing you've read this: >>> >>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace >>> >>> Make certain you've configure your kernel correctly, and that you've >>> rebuilt your kernel and modules... >>> >>> -Brandon > -- Charles R. (Charlie) Martin Senior Software Engineer SGI logo 1900 Pike Road Longmont, CO 80501 Phone: 303-532-0209 E-Mail: CRMartin@sgi.com Website: www.sgi.com From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 2 20:37:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30FA106566B; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 20:37:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crmartin@sgi.com) Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.sgi.com [192.48.179.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B78A8FC0A; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 20:37:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from xmail.sgi.com (pv-excas3-dc21-nlb.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.207]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D43304043; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 13:37:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.3.0.220] (10.3.0.220) by xmail.sgi.com (137.38.102.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.289.1; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 15:37:51 -0500 Message-ID: <4E613E9E.2070105@sgi.com> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:37:50 -0600 From: Charlie Martin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110805 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Charlie Martin References: <4E5FB956.1020206@sgi.com> <4E5FC073.5000101@sgi.com> <4E610A8F.4010908@sgi.com> <4E612FE4.7070507@FreeBSD.org> <4E61353B.5070404@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <4E61353B.5070404@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.3.0.220] Cc: Brandon Gooch , Garrett Cooper , Andriy Gapon , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kldload dtraceall exec format error X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 20:37:52 -0000 All right, now it works. There's some flaw in the build which causes the FreeBSD 8 to get the modules built for FreeBSD 7. Thanks all. On 2011-09-02 13:57, Charlie Martin wrote: > > > On 2011-09-02 13:35, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 02/09/2011 19:55 Charlie Martin said the following: >>> Yeah, and the same overall Makefile is successfully building in >>> dtrace on the >>> other part of the product, which is actually using FreeBSD >>> 7-something. I'm >>> sure there's some tiny difference, but it would sure help to have >>> some idea of >>> what those dmesg messages are telling me. >>> >>> It's not that the .ko's are missing, I checked that first thing. >> The message was expressly telling you that your cyclic.ko and your >> kernel are >> out of sync - built from different sources. > > Thanks. Puzzling ... it *seems* to be the same sources. > >>> On 2011-09-01 19:04, Brandon Gooch wrote: >>>> I'm guessing you've read this: >>>> >>>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace >>>> >>>> Make certain you've configure your kernel correctly, and that you've >>>> rebuilt your kernel and modules... >>>> >>>> -Brandon >> > -- Charles R. (Charlie) Martin Senior Software Engineer SGI logo 1900 Pike Road Longmont, CO 80501 Phone: 303-532-0209 E-Mail: CRMartin@sgi.com Website: www.sgi.com From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 2 20:48:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D74106568E; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 20:48:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF2E8FC18; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 20:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwg2 with SMTP id 2so2447241qwg.17 for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 13:48:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WUfxGY6cnt5O6rkpN9mQ+7pIwP/SIVsCzKe1eB950VI=; b=ElAIr81JonoIieYYXBXx60r1VNz+VsH5nh4hHp94xqJ3QPF/1C8wxdGc/iirTXNSwd 9w7UgmZKvleiGkdt+R+mjkoihr9RunMjfJCAw5OYJ07ZNMPrvigKrLB7tnoMXqdEqBhs 2EUtlSpJltt6A+mqmNfNXhQzvn6eb2awHOres= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.195.10 with SMTP id ea10mr1076400qab.342.1314996490252; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 13:48:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.37.83 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 13:48:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E613E9E.2070105@sgi.com> References: <4E5FB956.1020206@sgi.com> <4E5FC073.5000101@sgi.com> <4E610A8F.4010908@sgi.com> <4E612FE4.7070507@FreeBSD.org> <4E61353B.5070404@sgi.com> <4E613E9E.2070105@sgi.com> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 13:48:10 -0700 Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: Charlie Martin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Brandon Gooch , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: kldload dtraceall exec format error X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 20:48:11 -0000 On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Charlie Martin wrote: > All right, now it works. =A0There's some flaw in the build which causes t= he > FreeBSD 8 to get the modules built for FreeBSD 7. That assumption seems questionable. Do you have more details you can provide (i.e. where each source tree is located, how you're building things, etc)? Thanks, -Garrett From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 2 21:27:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7123106566B; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 21:27:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crmartin@sgi.com) Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.sgi.com [192.48.152.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACF68FC13; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 21:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from xmail.sgi.com (pv-excas3-dc21.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.206]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C360AC005; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:27:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.3.0.220] (10.3.0.220) by xmail.sgi.com (137.38.102.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.289.1; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:27:46 -0500 Message-ID: <4E614A51.8000809@sgi.com> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 15:27:45 -0600 From: Charlie Martin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110805 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garrett Cooper References: <4E5FB956.1020206@sgi.com> <4E5FC073.5000101@sgi.com> <4E610A8F.4010908@sgi.com> <4E612FE4.7070507@FreeBSD.org> <4E61353B.5070404@sgi.com> <4E613E9E.2070105@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.3.0.220] Cc: Brandon Gooch , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: kldload dtraceall exec format error X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 21:27:48 -0000 Sorry, I mean *our* build, and having just made it work by running our build and making sure which modules I was getting, I'm pretty confident. On 2011-09-02 14:48, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Charlie Martin wrote: >> All right, now it works. There's some flaw in the build which causes the >> FreeBSD 8 to get the modules built for FreeBSD 7. > That assumption seems questionable. Do you have more details you > can provide (i.e. where each source tree is located, how you're > building things, etc)? > Thanks, > -Garrett > -- Charles R. (Charlie) Martin Senior Software Engineer SGI logo 1900 Pike Road Longmont, CO 80501 Phone: 303-532-0209 E-Mail: CRMartin@sgi.com Website: www.sgi.com From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 2 21:49:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9906106566C; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 21:49:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com (mail-pz0-f45.google.com [209.85.210.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845648FC14; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 21:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so10440484pzk.18 for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:49:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=zsvoDR1Sh7H6cpGEHGlARoIUu38D761kiQx9hVMIOik=; b=aUqV52p9R5plA0MhcDrQJkzj6vaK5m2osPexGJCXzVFxd4KiWjG+MZDyVuI2N6FjaR vETLmwhtL/Mvc7gmWHlyc4p9i4WGqrmxwVQQmmkQGArB742pvWseRq8ftOEYpNUU9ROp S8X574hIBpBjtb1jXqxI1v7LplAIZo+7CtPQI= Received: by 10.68.33.201 with SMTP id t9mr2761077pbi.148.1315000168853; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:49:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from c-24-6-49-154.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (c-24-6-49-154.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.6.49.154]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x6sm989592pba.5.2011.09.02.14.49.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:49:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:49:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Garrett Cooper To: Charlie Martin In-Reply-To: <4E614A51.8000809@sgi.com> Message-ID: References: <4E5FB956.1020206@sgi.com> <4E5FC073.5000101@sgi.com> <4E610A8F.4010908@sgi.com> <4E612FE4.7070507@FreeBSD.org> <4E61353B.5070404@sgi.com> <4E613E9E.2070105@sgi.com> <4E614A51.8000809@sgi.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Garrett Cooper , Brandon Gooch , Andriy Gapon , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kldload dtraceall exec format error X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 21:49:29 -0000 On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Charlie Martin wrote: > Sorry, I mean *our* build, and having just made it work by running our build > and making sure which modules I was getting, I'm pretty confident. > > On 2011-09-02 14:48, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Charlie Martin wrote: >>> All right, now it works. There's some flaw in the build which causes the >>> FreeBSD 8 to get the modules built for FreeBSD 7. >> That assumption seems questionable. Do you have more details you >> can provide (i.e. where each source tree is located, how you're >> building things, etc)? Ok. There's a variable -- MODULES_OVERRIDE -- which will allow you to specify additional modules (overriding the generic list, which is all), which might get you on the right track. There are more variables documented in build(7) and other places that might help as well.. HTH, -Garrett From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 2 23:57:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BAA11065670 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 23:57:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4234914DB45; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 23:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E616D6E.4030903@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 16:57:34 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110901 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: petz@nisshoko.net References: <007301cc6979$a690f9a0$f3b2ece0$@internode.on.net> In-Reply-To: <007301cc6979$a690f9a0$f3b2ece0$@internode.on.net> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Jarrod Lee Petz Subject: Re: TIME_WAIT Assassination in FreeBSD??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 23:57:36 -0000 On 09/02/2011 07:07, Jarrod Lee Petz wrote: > We have an AIX system It's not clear to me what the FreeBSD related problem is here. -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 3 00:52:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D5F106564A for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 00:52:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlpetz@internode.on.net) Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.141]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78DE8FC0A for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 00:51:59 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAL12YU55LH3F/2dsb2JhbABCqGp5gUYBAQUIAh4SHC8BAwIGAxEEAQEBJwcZIA0JCAIEARILBQu/PIZqBJtriGA Received: from ppp121-44-125-197.lns20.syd6.internode.on.net (HELO Minx) ([121.44.125.197]) by ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2011 10:21:58 +0930 From: "Jarrod Lee Petz" To: "'Doug Barton'" , References: <007301cc6979$a690f9a0$f3b2ece0$@internode.on.net> <4E616D6E.4030903@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E616D6E.4030903@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 10:51:56 +1000 Message-ID: <001701cc69d3$aea9a0b0$0bfce210$@internode.on.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQHuPCHqJDmDdIw669xIXvDN9LM1EADkjGxslO/+gBA= Content-Language: en-au Cc: Subject: RE: TIME_WAIT Assassination in FreeBSD??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: petz@nisshoko.net List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 00:52:01 -0000 Hi Doug, The problem itself is currently seen on AIX yes. However, I am more after. 1. Insight into the TCP/IP stack. Is it broken here? 2. Insight into whether active FTP is flawed in design? Or perhaps just this implementation of it? Solution is to use passive FTP which seems fine. 3. Would FreeBSD have the same issue? According to RFC6056, FreeBSD uses "algorithm 1" which "is biased towards the first available port after a sequence of unavailable port numbers." So unless it does something fancy like TIME_WAIT assassination. I think it would behave similar to AIX when doing multiple active FTP data connections & encounter the same issue. Regards Jarrod -----Original Message----- From: Doug Barton [mailto:dougb@FreeBSD.org] Sent: Saturday, 3 September 2011 9:58 AM To: petz@nisshoko.net Cc: Jarrod Lee Petz; freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: TIME_WAIT Assassination in FreeBSD??? On 09/02/2011 07:07, Jarrod Lee Petz wrote: > We have an AIX system It's not clear to me what the FreeBSD related problem is here. -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 3 05:25:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A467F106566C for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 05:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D287151B1F; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 05:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E61BA37.2060204@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 22:25:11 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110901 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: petz@nisshoko.net References: <007301cc6979$a690f9a0$f3b2ece0$@internode.on.net> <4E616D6E.4030903@FreeBSD.org> <001701cc69d3$aea9a0b0$0bfce210$@internode.on.net> In-Reply-To: <001701cc69d3$aea9a0b0$0bfce210$@internode.on.net> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, Jarrod Lee Petz Subject: Re: TIME_WAIT Assassination in FreeBSD??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 05:25:13 -0000 On 09/02/2011 17:51, Jarrod Lee Petz wrote: > Hi Doug, > > The problem itself is currently seen on AIX yes. So you're much more likely to get help on an AIX list. -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 3 13:58:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2C7106566B for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 13:58:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp05.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp05.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.153.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7495D8FC14 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 13:58:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c83-255-51-20.bredband.comhem.se ([83.255.51.20]:49029 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp05.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QzqY0-0003BZ-HF for freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 15:46:14 +0200 Received: (qmail 56150 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2011 15:46:09 +0200 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 3 Sep 2011 15:46:09 +0200 Received: (qmail 55683 invoked by uid 1001); 3 Sep 2011 15:46:34 +0200 Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 15:46:34 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20110903134634.GA55652@owl.midgard.homeip.net> References: <007301cc6979$a690f9a0$f3b2ece0$@internode.on.net> <4E616D6E.4030903@FreeBSD.org> <001701cc69d3$aea9a0b0$0bfce210$@internode.on.net> <4E61BA37.2060204@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E61BA37.2060204@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Originating-IP: 83.255.51.20 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1QzqY0-0003BZ-HF. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp05.sth.basefarm.net 1QzqY0-0003BZ-HF 1c4b791afcda2f6f10715427c9e48a39 Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, petz@nisshoko.net, Jarrod Lee Petz Subject: Re: TIME_WAIT Assassination in FreeBSD??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 13:58:44 -0000 On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 10:25:11PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 09/02/2011 17:51, Jarrod Lee Petz wrote: > > Hi Doug, > > > > The problem itself is currently seen on AIX yes. > > So you're much more likely to get help on an AIX list. Unlikely, since what he primarily asked about was if the problem in question also exists on FreeBSD. That is something that AIX people are unlikely to know anything about. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 3 23:34:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A5C106564A for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 23:34:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76AFB14E5E8; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 23:34:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E62B99C.6020707@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 16:34:52 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110901 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erik Trulsson References: <007301cc6979$a690f9a0$f3b2ece0$@internode.on.net> <4E616D6E.4030903@FreeBSD.org> <001701cc69d3$aea9a0b0$0bfce210$@internode.on.net> <4E61BA37.2060204@FreeBSD.org> <20110903134634.GA55652@owl.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20110903134634.GA55652@owl.midgard.homeip.net> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, petz@nisshoko.net, Jarrod Lee Petz Subject: Re: TIME_WAIT Assassination in FreeBSD??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 23:34:54 -0000 On 09/03/2011 06:46, Erik Trulsson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 10:25:11PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 09/02/2011 17:51, Jarrod Lee Petz wrote: >>> Hi Doug, >>> >>> The problem itself is currently seen on AIX yes. >> >> So you're much more likely to get help on an AIX list. > > Unlikely, since what he primarily asked about was if the problem in > question also exists on FreeBSD. That is something that AIX people are > unlikely to know anything about. I'd argue with "primarily," but since one other person has told me privately that they think my response was wrong, I'll respond publicly with my rationale. 1. His question is unlikely to get answered 2. ... at least in part because he mailed the wrong list 3. ... therefore I'm trying to manage expectations. Now, oddly enough, I notice that my responses to the OP are a hot topic of conversation, but no one has bothered to actually answer his questions. Hmmmmm..... Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/