From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 11:06:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B9F1065679 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:06:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161C08FC2C for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2SB6wdt026680 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:06:58 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p2SB6woh026678 for freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:06:58 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:06:58 GMT Message-Id: <201103281106.p2SB6woh026678@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:06:59 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o misc/155765 jail [patch] `buildworld' does not honors WITHOUT_JAIL o conf/154246 jail [jail] [patch] Bad symlink created if devfs mount poin o conf/150599 jail [patch] /etc/rc.d/jail does not set jailname. o conf/149050 jail [jail] rcorder ``nojail'' too coarse for Jail+VNET s conf/142972 jail [jail] [patch] Support JAILv2 and vnet in rc.d/jail o conf/141317 jail [patch] uncorrect jail stop in /etc/rc.d/jail o kern/133265 jail [jail] is there a solution how to run nfs client in ja o kern/119842 jail [smbfs] [jail] "Bad address" with smbfs inside a jail o bin/99566 jail [jail] [patch] fstat(1) according to specified jid o bin/32828 jail [jail] w(1) incorrectly handles stale utmp slots with 10 problems total. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 20:08:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D885F106567C; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 20:08:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from spock-ext.obspm.fr (spock-ext.obspm.fr [145.238.186.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF4A8FC26; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 20:08:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from obspm.fr (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.184.233]) by spock-ext.obspm.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/DIO Observatoire de Paris - 15/04/10) with ESMTP id p2SK8d1D005688 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:08:40 +0200 Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:08:39 +0200 From: Albert Shih To: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <20110328200839.GA16611@obspm.fr> References: <20110322131435.GA5792@obspm.fr> <4D890905.9010000@freebsd.org> <20110323100504.GA8779@obspm.fr> <4D8AE4BC.4080900@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4D8AE4BC.4080900@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.4 (spock-ext.obspm.fr [145.238.186.20]); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:08:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at spock-ext.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setfib mount X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 20:08:43 -0000 Le 23/03/2011 à 23:29:16-0700, Julian Elischer a écrit > >> > > No. > > > > The mount is on the host. > > so then I too am not sure why the mount itself would use the second FIB. > is it possible that some of the mounting is being done automatically > by rc scripts > using /etc/fstab in the jail? No totally «impossible»...;-) But maybe I find something. I need to do some tests (the server is in production) but seem to me it's more complicate then I though. Configuration : Two physical interfaces (bce0 and bce1) The «host» is on the bce0 --> setfib 0 The jail is on the bce1. --> setfib 1 If I try in the /etc/fstab to put the mount he seem to me the connection start from bce1. If I don't put the mount in the /etc/fstab but in something like (or manually) /etc/rc.local with #/usr/sbin/setfib 0 mount -t nfs -o rw,tcp etc... it's working...until the jail try to access to this partition at this moment the connection start from bce1. So to solve my problem I put the mount in the /etc/fstab and make the NFS-server accept connection from bce1. But...I think it's a bug.... If you want me to do some other tests tell me (and give me some time). Regards. JAS -- Albert SHIH DIO batiment 15 Observatoire de Paris Meudon 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26/06 86 69 95 71 Heure local/Local time: lun 28 mar 2011 22:02:00 CEST From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 30 03:56:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0DF1065749 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 03:56:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rob@debank.tv) Received: from smtpout02.onlinespamfilter.nl (smtpout02.onlinespamfilter.nl [217.21.240.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940678FC14 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 03:56:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.onlinespamfilter.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.onlinespamfilter.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E872504B for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 05:37:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.debank.tv (59-80-ftth.onsneteindhoven.nl [88.159.80.59]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.onlinespamfilter.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 05:37:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.debank.tv (smtp.debank.tv [172.16.143.25]) by smtp.debank.tv (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3211DB1C44 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 05:37:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from debank.tv (www.debank.tv [IPv6:2001:1af8:fe30::22]) by smtp.debank.tv (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DA41DB1921 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 05:37:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 192.11.175.219 (SquirrelMail authenticated user rob@debank.tv) by debank.tv with HTTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:37:12 +1300 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:37:12 +1300 From: "Rob Evers" To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP @ debank.tv X-OSF-Virus: CLEAN X-OSF-Outgoing: Innocent X-OSF-SUM: 8b9783c25551c96514f5c25709f1edc8 X-OSF-Info: Checked for spam and viruses Cc: Subject: ipv6 loopback behaviour inside jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 03:56:23 -0000 All, I've got a question about the IPv6 loopback address inside a jail. I've got a bunch of jails configured with both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses all of which are tied to a physical interface (em0). When I'm inside the jail I can ping 127.0.0.1 without any problems: root@imap:~#ping 127.0.0.1 PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.031 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.049 ms ^C A ping6 to ::1 however returns: root@imap:~#ping6 ::1 PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2001:1af8:fe30::26 --> ::1 ping6: sendmsg: Can't assign requested address ping6: wrote ::1 16 chars, ret=-1 ^C When I configure the IPv6 address used by the jail on the loopback interface (lo0) things magically start working: root@test:~#ping6 ::1 PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2001:1af8:fe30::36 --> ::1 16 bytes from 2001:1af8:fe30::36, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64 time=0.092 ms ^C My question; is this supposed to work like this because it feels a bit inconsistent, I could migrate the IPv6 addresses to the loopback interface but prefer to have them directly connected on the LAN. Thanks for any insight! Rob Evers P.S. I can supply any further information needed. -- If we don't believe in free expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all. Noam Chomsky ***deze e-mail is gescand door Onlinespamfilter.nl*** From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 31 20:50:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583551065674 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:50:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mx1.sbone.de (mx1.sbone.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:130:3ffc::401:25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9838FC20 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:50:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7340525D37C7; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F3E9159C08F; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:50:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) by content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k3hv379Dqgnx; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nv.sbone.de (nv.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4F38159C07E; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:50:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" To: Rob Evers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ipv6 loopback behaviour inside jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:50:10 -0000 On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Rob Evers wrote: > P.S. I can supply any further information needed. Which verison of FreeBSD are you running? -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 1 19:09:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04A31065670; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 19:09:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49A78FC12; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 19:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p31J9ohE044602; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 19:09:50 GMT (envelope-from linimon@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p31J9oxi044598; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 19:09:50 GMT (envelope-from linimon) Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 19:09:50 GMT Message-Id: <201104011909.p31J9oxi044598@freefall.freebsd.org> To: linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org From: linimon@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/156111: [jail] procstat -b not supported in jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 19:09:51 -0000 Old Synopsis: procstat -b not supported in jail New Synopsis: [jail] procstat -b not supported in jail Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-jail Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Apr 1 19:09:33 UTC 2011 Responsible-Changed-Why: probably jail-specific. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=156111