From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 19 11:07:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF951065687 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:07:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC928FC1D for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:07:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8JB78PG073545 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:07:08 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p8JB77Je073543 for freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:07:07 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:07:07 GMT Message-Id: <201109191107.p8JB77Je073543@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:07:08 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/159918 jail [jail] inter-jail communication failure o kern/156111 jail [jail] procstat -b not supported in jail o misc/155765 jail [patch] `buildworld' does not honors WITHOUT_JAIL o conf/154246 jail [jail] [patch] Bad symlink created if devfs mount poin o conf/149050 jail [jail] rcorder ``nojail'' too coarse for Jail+VNET s conf/142972 jail [jail] [patch] Support JAILv2 and vnet in rc.d/jail o conf/141317 jail [patch] uncorrect jail stop in /etc/rc.d/jail o kern/133265 jail [jail] is there a solution how to run nfs client in ja o kern/119842 jail [smbfs] [jail] "Bad address" with smbfs inside a jail o bin/99566 jail [jail] [patch] fstat(1) according to specified jid o bin/32828 jail [jail] w(1) incorrectly handles stale utmp slots with 11 problems total. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 20 15:22:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3A91065674; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:22:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from moritz@barfooze.de) Received: from barfooze.de (barfooze.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:7d:200:0:4e2e:75d4:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8578FC1C; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:22:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moritz by barfooze.de with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1R6291-0002Dr-P0; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:21:59 +0200 Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:21:59 +0200 From: Moritz Wilhelmy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110920152159.GK22957@barfooze.de> References: <20110919151641.GI22957@barfooze.de> <20110920105948.GJ22957@barfooze.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110920105948.GJ22957@barfooze.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, moritz@wzff.de Subject: Re: Passing additional options to jail(8) via rc.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:22:02 -0000 On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:59:48 +0200, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote: > if it really is impossible to pass parameters like ip4=inherit to > jail(8) via the rc.conf mechanism, I consider this a serious limitation. > Can I possibly make this a feature request? :) Alright, just for the record, apparently there is a (suspended) PR (conf/142972) which requests /etc/rc.d/jail to be switched over to "new style" jail(8) invocation (with -c/-m parameters), which, unlike "old-style" invocation supports passing additional parameters, which has worked for me in the past, when done by hand. On previous servers, I ended up putting something in my rc.local, but as already mentioned, I'd very much prefer the rc.conf-sugar. This PR was filed about a year ago, and I'm a bit disappointed, because one of the main reasons for me to pick FreeBSD was the jail support, which is pretty amazing if you ask me, if only there was a way to start them *with* parameters... :-( Please do something. I know freebsd-questions is the wrong list for this (so I will be posting it to freebsd-jail as well), but my initial post ended up there. I don't care whether you end up with an /etc/jail.d as proposed in conf/116416, but IMHO, there should be some *documented* way, which is officially supported and available on a default installation of FreeBSD, to start a jail with all parameters advertised in the manpage. Please keep me in CC, I am not subscribed to freebsd-jail. Best regards, Moritz From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 20 16:54:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF621065670; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:54:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mx1.sbone.de (mx1.sbone.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:130:3ffc::401:25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE278FC08; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:54:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 621B925D3888; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:54:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86FCEBD3C8E; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:54:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) by content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B1c-45eugV68; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orange-en1.sbone.de (orange-en1.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31:cabc:c8ff:fecf:e8e3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 875A2BD3C32; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" In-Reply-To: <20110920152159.GK22957@barfooze.de> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:54:33 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <3B59556D-3799-41E5-8F8A-FFBBA5A3963C@lists.zabbadoz.net> References: <20110919151641.GI22957@barfooze.de> <20110920105948.GJ22957@barfooze.de> <20110920152159.GK22957@barfooze.de> To: Moritz Wilhelmy X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Passing additional options to jail(8) via rc.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:54:38 -0000 On Sep 20, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote: > Please keep me in CC, I am not subscribed to freebsd-jail. Which is your problem as the real solution is being discussed there and is really looking for more eyes. Search for Jamie's posts in the list archive. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 20 17:25:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BDB1106566B; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:25:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from moritz@barfooze.de) Received: from barfooze.de (barfooze.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:7d:200:0:4e2e:75d4:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06028FC0A; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moritz by barfooze.de with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1R644E-0000ZE-Ii; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:25:10 +0200 Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:25:10 +0200 From: Moritz Wilhelmy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110920172510.GN22957@barfooze.de> References: <20110919151641.GI22957@barfooze.de> <20110920105948.GJ22957@barfooze.de> <20110920152159.GK22957@barfooze.de> <3B59556D-3799-41E5-8F8A-FFBBA5A3963C@lists.zabbadoz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3B59556D-3799-41E5-8F8A-FFBBA5A3963C@lists.zabbadoz.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, moritz@wzff.de Subject: Re: Passing additional options to jail(8) via rc.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:25:12 -0000 On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 16:54:33 +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Sep 20, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote: > > > Please keep me in CC, I am not subscribed to freebsd-jail. > > Which is your problem as the real solution is being discussed there and > is really looking for more eyes. Search for Jamie's posts in the list > archive. I wasn't subscribed to freebsd-questions either, back in July. I had some FreeBSDs running before, but I really wasn't reading any mailing lists. I thought I should ask -questions first, because it is the most busy one, with all the chatter and noise. Guess I will either patch jail(8) or do it via rc.local on 8.2 and wait for the release of 9, which seems to be quite an improvement in general. I'm also not that actively involved in FreeBSD, and I try not to subscribe too many mailing lists in general. I thought the PR was the only thing there was, and google tricked me into believing this. Maybe someone could close the PR in case this is resolved. My apologies. Thanks to Jamie for adding support for the config file. Best regards, Moritz From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 20 19:57:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30005106566C for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:57:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mx1.sbone.de (mx1.sbone.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:130:3ffc::401:25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1398FC12 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1456325D3872; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:57:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10851BD3C3B; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:57:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) by content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z3eSoJvqehoH; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orange-en1.sbone.de (orange-en1.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31:cabc:c8ff:fecf:e8e3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28EB8BD3BF0; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" In-Reply-To: <20110920172510.GN22957@barfooze.de> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:57:41 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1ED103BB-8D20-4296-9F1C-20AC96539A48@lists.zabbadoz.net> References: <20110919151641.GI22957@barfooze.de> <20110920105948.GJ22957@barfooze.de> <20110920152159.GK22957@barfooze.de> <3B59556D-3799-41E5-8F8A-FFBBA5A3963C@lists.zabbadoz.net> <20110920172510.GN22957@barfooze.de> To: Moritz Wilhelmy X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: freebsd-jail Subject: Re: Passing additional options to jail(8) via rc.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:57:53 -0000 On Sep 20, 2011, at 5:25 PM, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 16:54:33 +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >> On Sep 20, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote: >> >>> Please keep me in CC, I am not subscribed to freebsd-jail. >> >> Which is your problem as the real solution is being discussed there and >> is really looking for more eyes. Search for Jamie's posts in the list >> archive. > > I wasn't subscribed to freebsd-questions either, back in July. I had > some FreeBSDs running before, but I really wasn't reading any mailing > lists. I thought I should ask -questions first, because it is the most > busy one, with all the chatter and noise. Guess I will either patch > jail(8) or do it via rc.local on 8.2 and wait for the release of 9, > which seems to be quite an improvement in general. I'm also not that > actively involved in FreeBSD, and I try not to subscribe too many > mailing lists in general. I thought the PR was the only thing there was, > and google tricked me into believing this. Maybe someone could close the > PR in case this is resolved. > > My apologies. Thanks to Jamie for adding support for the config file. It's not in 9 for 9.0. But we'd appreciate if you'd give it a try:) If you have questions, posting them to freebsd-jail should give you help. Bjoern -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 22 07:54:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA4A1065670 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:54:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from moritz@barfooze.de) Received: from barfooze.de (barfooze.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:7d:200:0:4e2e:75d4:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB67A8FC13 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:54:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moritz by barfooze.de with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1R6e7O-0003vO-AK for freebsd-jail@freebsd.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:54:50 +0200 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:54:50 +0200 From: Moritz Wilhelmy To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110922075450.GQ22957@barfooze.de> References: <20110919151641.GI22957@barfooze.de> <20110920105948.GJ22957@barfooze.de> <20110920152159.GK22957@barfooze.de> <3B59556D-3799-41E5-8F8A-FFBBA5A3963C@lists.zabbadoz.net> <20110920172510.GN22957@barfooze.de> <1ED103BB-8D20-4296-9F1C-20AC96539A48@lists.zabbadoz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1ED103BB-8D20-4296-9F1C-20AC96539A48@lists.zabbadoz.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Getting jail(8) config file support into future FreeBSD releases (Was: Re: Passing additional options to jail(8) via rc.conf) X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:54:52 -0000 On Sep 20, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote: > Please keep me in CC, I am not subscribed to freebsd-jail. Disregard that, now I'm subscribed :-P On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 19:57:41 +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > It's not in 9 for 9.0. But we'd appreciate if you'd give it a try:) > If you have questions, posting them to freebsd-jail should give you help. Is there any chance to get it into 9.1? It doesn't seem that critical that it should be necessary to wait until 10.0, but then again, I'm no expert on what's release critical for FreeBSD releases. Would you please explain? Best regards, Moritz From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 22 16:26:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B8B1065670 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:26:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779578FC0A for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:26:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so4210213vws.13 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:26:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EyBQdcGkofef++TaCQGik3NMlHQKyM+YzZeHps0NMW4=; b=f1pmqADVVQzOxtTWjc2QyVbwx29liucZh0eVZtacON1j4BtKhoDNx6o4+bt+5iaZMw 9xPZxL+vHRUWS9KyXXGs7Eks7WoUbv+wY7L1EAvAypWdWRfAOUaMxl273HYH9er9fpqS Uunsk30K8CTEUqJjB11fN45L2sYvtN03gi/Cg= Received: by 10.52.100.3 with SMTP id eu3mr2137115vdb.123.1316708328915; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:18:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from schism.local (75-146-225-65-Philadelphia.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [75.146.225.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id du1sm6936793vdb.11.2011.09.22.09.18.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:18:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E7B5FE7.30509@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:18:47 -0400 From: Glen Barber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Moritz Wilhelmy References: <20110919151641.GI22957@barfooze.de> <20110920105948.GJ22957@barfooze.de> <20110920152159.GK22957@barfooze.de> <3B59556D-3799-41E5-8F8A-FFBBA5A3963C@lists.zabbadoz.net> <20110920172510.GN22957@barfooze.de> <1ED103BB-8D20-4296-9F1C-20AC96539A48@lists.zabbadoz.net> <20110922075450.GQ22957@barfooze.de> <4E7B5DB5.6050505@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E7B5DB5.6050505@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting jail(8) config file support into future FreeBSD releases (Was: Re: Passing additional options to jail(8) via rc.conf) X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:26:07 -0000 On 9/22/11 12:09 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > If this feature is in 9-STABLE (which it is), then it will be in > 9.1-RELEASE. > Meh, forget I said that. There is no 9-STABLE yet. I misread a previous post as "This is in 9 not for 9.0." Sorry about that. But, if it does make it to 9-STABLE when that is available, then this will be in 9.1-RELEASE. -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 22 16:37:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEB4106564A for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:37:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B618FC16 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwb8 with SMTP id 8so6693289qwb.3 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:37:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vRQ5lRr6QiHHEd2ydF7o1/T2y+YvyYmL9/lAAGYeMR8=; b=ikQxAD6GbEDeK7PjTrtUiWCKdmbiee8a0sDmVG0QnA7OuQN/KWdU27I+wYQppdli7z GNsZw9fGZO3xgzmMYemblFHh0vCTcI3pc6LdlSnejWn3rb866uTmEKVzut4DjAtMB2xD mEg+gsdXCfdsK9AWmPAJTgO7yGf5GT7pcR+8s= Received: by 10.224.199.130 with SMTP id es2mr1962240qab.356.1316707768901; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:09:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from schism.local (75-146-225-65-Philadelphia.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [75.146.225.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id he10sm1132381qab.25.2011.09.22.09.09.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:09:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E7B5DB5.6050505@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:09:25 -0400 From: Glen Barber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Moritz Wilhelmy References: <20110919151641.GI22957@barfooze.de> <20110920105948.GJ22957@barfooze.de> <20110920152159.GK22957@barfooze.de> <3B59556D-3799-41E5-8F8A-FFBBA5A3963C@lists.zabbadoz.net> <20110920172510.GN22957@barfooze.de> <1ED103BB-8D20-4296-9F1C-20AC96539A48@lists.zabbadoz.net> <20110922075450.GQ22957@barfooze.de> In-Reply-To: <20110922075450.GQ22957@barfooze.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting jail(8) config file support into future FreeBSD releases (Was: Re: Passing additional options to jail(8) via rc.conf) X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:37:12 -0000 Hi, On 9/22/11 3:54 AM, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote: > Is there any chance to get it into 9.1? It doesn't seem that critical > that it should be necessary to wait until 10.0, but then again, I'm no > expert on what's release critical for FreeBSD releases. Would you please > explain? > If this feature is in 9-STABLE (which it is), then it will be in 9.1-RELEASE. Regards, -- Glen Barber