Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 24 Dec 2011 19:58:20 -0500
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@gmail.com>
Cc:        Bjoern Zeeb <bz@freebsd.org>, net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] Minor fixes to netinet6/icmp6.c
Message-ID:  <4EF6752C.4040109@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAE-mSOLryQb6n0RcxM=LHFCLN=25Tfk5bLnLjK1e5XbU5ncmWw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201112231446.38057.jhb@freebsd.org> <CAE-mSOLryQb6n0RcxM=LHFCLN=25Tfk5bLnLjK1e5XbU5ncmWw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/23/11 6:38 PM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> On 23 December 2011 23:46, John Baldwin<jhb@freebsd.org>  wrote:
>> I found these nits while working on the patches to convert if_addr_mtx to an
>> rwlock.  The first change is cosmetic, it just un-inlines a TAILQ_FOREACH().
>> The second change is an actual bug.  The code is currently reading
>> TAILQ_FIRST(&V_ifnet) without holding the appropriate lock.
>>
>> Index: icmp6.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- icmp6.c     (revision 228777)
>> +++ icmp6.c     (working copy)
>> @@ -1780,7 +1780,7 @@ ni6_addrs(struct icmp6_nodeinfo *ni6, struct mbuf
>>         }
>>
>>         IFNET_RLOCK_NOSLEEP();
>> -       for (ifp = TAILQ_FIRST(&V_ifnet); ifp; ifp = TAILQ_NEXT(ifp, if_list)) {
>> +       TAILQ_FOREACH(ifp,&V_ifnet, if_list) {
>>                 addrsofif = 0;
>>                 IF_ADDR_LOCK(ifp);
>>                 TAILQ_FOREACH(ifa,&ifp->if_addrhead, ifa_link) {
>
> FWIW, there are much more of them in netinet6.
> Some time ago I started to un-expand them to queue(3).
> [not unfinished yet..]

I went ahead and did a sweep for queue(3) changes in netinet6.  I went a 
bit further and removed things like the ndpr_next hack, etc.  This only 
includes queue(3) changes though, not your other fixes like moving 
common code out of blocks.  I also fixed a few places to use *_EMPTY() 
instead of checking *_FIRST() against NULL.  There should be no 
functional change.

http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/inet6_queue.patch

-- 
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EF6752C.4040109>