From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 31 15:31:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA16106566B; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:31:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A4C8FC1C; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:31:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5JMg-00027z-7A; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:00:50 +0400 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:00:50 +0400 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: jeff@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110331150050.GK7415@zxy.spb.ru> References: <4D42F87C.7020909@freebsd.org> <20110128172516.GG18170@zxy.spb.ru> <20110129070205.Q7034@besplex.bde.org> <20110201113724.GS18170@zxy.spb.ru> <8979148D-8F2E-49E3-86EE-41CE6F57CDA4@moneybookers.com> <20110201121803.GT18170@zxy.spb.ru> <20110201131501.GV18170@zxy.spb.ru> <20110201144629.GW18170@zxy.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110201144629.GW18170@zxy.spb.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Interrupt performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:31:04 -0000 On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 05:46:29PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 04:15:01PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 02:23:32PM +0200, Stefan Lambrev wrote: > > > > > >> Also in the past ENOBUF was not handled properly in linux. > > > >> > > > >> http://wiki.freebsd.org/AvoidingLinuxisms - Do not rely on Linux-specific socket behaviour. In particular, default socket buffer sizes are different (call setsockopt() with SO_SNDBUF and SO_RCVBUF), and while Linux's send() blocks when the socket buffer is full, FreeBSD's will fail and set ENOBUFS in errno. > > > > > > > > Yes, about ENOBUFS with udp socket I told. > > > > And this behaviour (block on udp socket send) in Solaris too. > > > > I don't know what behaviour is right. > > > > > > Well, according to the man pages in linux and fbsd the bsd behavior is right. I was looking into this long time ago with some red hat linux. > > > > I have't any idea for blocking UDP socket, other then benchmarks. > > > > Now I test TCP and see strange result. > > > > # netperf -H 10.200.0.1 -t TCP_STREAM -C -c -l 60 -- -s 128K -S 128K > > TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 10.200.0.1 (10.200.0.1) port 0 AF_INET > > Recv Send Send Utilization Service Demand > > Socket Socket Message Elapsed Send Recv Send Recv > > Size Size Size Time Throughput local remote local remote > > bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/s % U % U us/KB us/KB > > > > 131072 131072 131072 60.00 522.08 -1.00 -1.00 0.000 -0.314 > > > > Now I run ./loop 2000000000 and see stoping transmit. > > > > procs memory page disk faults cpu > > r b w avm fre flt re pi po fr sr ad0 in sy cs us sy id > > 2 0 0 107M 435M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15939 618 39502 0 77 23 > > 1 0 0 107M 435M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15904 619 39355 0 75 25 > > 1 0 0 107M 435M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16193 615 40085 0 79 21 > > 1 0 0 107M 435M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16028 623 39708 1 74 26 > > 1 0 0 107M 435M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15965 615 39475 0 77 23 > > 1 0 0 107M 435M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16012 636 39666 0 84 16 <-- run ./loop 2000000000 > > 2 0 0 109M 435M 46 0 0 0 9 0 0 9632 507 24041 48 51 1 > > 2 0 0 109M 435M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6592 319 16419 73 27 0 > > 2 0 0 109M 435M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 455 136 1250 100 0 0 > > 2 0 0 109M 435M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 420 127 1170 99 1 0 > > 2 0 0 109M 435M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 395 127 1127 100 0 0 > > 2 0 0 109M 435M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 428 127 1209 100 0 0 > > 2 0 0 109M 435M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 537 130 1434 99 1 0 > > 2 0 0 109M 435M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 449 136 1255 100 0 0 > > 1 0 0 107M 435M 14 0 0 0 37 0 0 7634 400 19044 56 30 14 <- end ./loop (Elapsed 8470990 us) > > 1 0 0 107M 435M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14893 579 37088 0 75 25 > > 1 0 0 107M 435M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16123 615 40163 0 78 22 > > 1 0 0 107M 435M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15220 582 37939 0 72 28 > > > > Wtf? > > Only with ULE sheduler. > No effect with 4BSD sheduler (./loop Elapsed 30611224 us). With last ULE patches === ts->ts_rltick = ticks; td->td_lastcpu = td->td_oncpu; td->td_oncpu = NOCPU; - td->td_flags &= ~TDF_NEEDRESCHED; + if ((flags & SW_PREEMPT) == 0) + td->td_flags &= ~TDF_NEEDRESCHED; td->td_owepreempt = 0; tdq->tdq_switchcnt++; === Strange effect: 0 0 0 97724K 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 115 305 0 0 100 0 0 0 97724K 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 123 318 0 1 99 0 0 0 97724K 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 115 303 0 0 100 0 0 0 97724K 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 115 335 0 0 100 0 0 0 97724K 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 115 305 0 0 100 0 0 0 97724K 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 115 305 0 0 100 0 0 0 97724K 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 123 310 0 0 100 0 0 0 97724K 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 136 342 0 0 100 0 0 0 97724K 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 119 315 0 0 100 1 0 0 99M 436M 144 0 0 0 16 0 0 16866 732 42530 0 65 35 <-- start netperf 1 0 0 99M 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18059 614 45335 0 77 23 1 0 0 99M 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18202 622 45790 0 74 26 1 0 0 99M 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18152 615 45894 0 77 23 1 0 0 99M 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18098 615 45393 0 76 24 ./loop 2000000000 1 0 0 99M 436M 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 17936 635 44907 0 84 16 <-- start loop 2 0 0 100M 436M 46 0 0 0 9 0 0 10522 499 26780 50 47 3 2 0 0 100M 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18207 622 45415 24 76 0 2 0 0 100M 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16818 584 42217 30 70 0 2 0 0 100M 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18090 615 45412 19 81 0 2 0 0 100M 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18005 614 44891 17 83 0 2 0 0 100M 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18221 614 45560 23 77 0 2 0 0 100M 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18062 623 44903 27 73 0 2 0 0 100M 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18165 607 45104 26 74 0 <-- begin degradation 2 0 0 100M 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 522 127 1449 100 0 0 2 0 0 100M 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 478 128 1311 100 0 0 procs memory page disk faults cpu r b w avm fre flt re pi po fr sr ad0 in sy cs us sy id 3 0 0 100M 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 453 128 1267 100 0 0 2 0 0 100M 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 503 136 1383 100 0 0 2 0 0 100M 436M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 551 129 1521 100 0 0 <-- end loop Elapsed 13665127 us