From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 14 09:48:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99741106564A; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 09:48:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from niclas.zeising@gmail.com) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (mail.lysator.liu.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:17:f0a0::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F9F8FC1A; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 09:48:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3B34001B; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:48:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix, from userid 1004) id E2D9A40009; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:48:12 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bernadotte.lysator.liu.se X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 Received: from mx.daemonic.se (mx.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70D3B40005; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:48:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::4]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEAF3119C04; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:48:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:1::4] (vivi.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:1::4]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E6C412B0A0; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:48:10 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E4799D4.8000703@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:48:04 +0200 From: Niclas Zeising User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland Smith References: <4E454ADD.1020201@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110812171611.GA88850@slackbox.erewhon.net> <20110812182108.GA90173@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E457477.4060400@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110812205408.GA9873@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E45ACA8.5070406@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110813072642.GA24239@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E462D0D.8070901@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110813100810.GA27193@slackbox.erewhon.net> In-Reply-To: <20110813100810.GA27193@slackbox.erewhon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: Olivier Smedts , FreeBSD Current , "Hartmann, O." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 09:48:14 -0000 On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote: > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >> On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote: >>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >>>> On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >>>>>>>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz >>> Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the >>> permissions et cetera OK? >>> >>> Roland >> >> No, it does not. >> >> What I did so far over night: >> >> I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again. >> Again failure. >> After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports). >> Everything seems >> all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a >> non-portsnap-created /usr/ports >> and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very >> same failure: >> >> (portsnap fetch extract:) >> /usr/ports/devel/cccc/ >> /usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/ >> /usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/ >> /usr/ports/devel/cdash/ >> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not >> found -- snapshot corrupt. > > I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is generated > by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is looking for a > file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is IMO > > 1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?) > 2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto) > 3) tar (ditto) > > When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks it with > tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm ${SNAPSHOTHASH}.tgz' > in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an > 8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar. If so, that would be a bug! > > Roland Just a "me too!". It happens for me on a recently updated 9-current virtual machine, built with clang. Regards! -- Niclas From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 14 10:17:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3AF91065672; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:17:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68278FC1C; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:17:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1QsXlL-0001xl-SV>; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:17:47 +0200 Received: from e178037016.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.37.16] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1QsXlL-0002Kd-Oz>; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:17:47 +0200 Message-ID: <4E47A0CB.6090002@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:17:47 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110712 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Niclas Zeising References: <4E454ADD.1020201@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110812171611.GA88850@slackbox.erewhon.net> <20110812182108.GA90173@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E457477.4060400@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110812205408.GA9873@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E45ACA8.5070406@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110813072642.GA24239@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E462D0D.8070901@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110813100810.GA27193@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E4799D4.8000703@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E4799D4.8000703@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.37.16 Cc: Olivier Smedts , Roland Smith , FreeBSD Current , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:17:50 -0000 On 08/14/11 11:48, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >>> On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote: >>>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >>>>> On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >>>>>>>>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz >>>> Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the >>>> permissions et cetera OK? >>>> >>>> Roland >>> No, it does not. >>> >>> What I did so far over night: >>> >>> I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again. >>> Again failure. >>> After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports). >>> Everything seems >>> all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a >>> non-portsnap-created /usr/ports >>> and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very >>> same failure: >>> >>> (portsnap fetch extract:) >>> /usr/ports/devel/cccc/ >>> /usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/ >>> /usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/ >>> /usr/ports/devel/cdash/ >>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not >>> found -- snapshot corrupt. >> I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is generated >> by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is looking for a >> file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is IMO >> >> 1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?) >> 2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto) >> 3) tar (ditto) >> >> When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks it with >> tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm ${SNAPSHOTHASH}.tgz' >> in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an >> 8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar. If so, that would be a bug! >> >> Roland > Just a "me too!". It happens for me on a recently updated 9-current > virtual machine, built with clang. > Regards! Just got a notebook, build with the old gcc 4.2 of the system FreeBSD 9.0/amd64 -r224579: portsnap works as expected. I will build a most recent system on that box (with systems's outdated gcc 4.2) and I'll report if the problem is still present. By the way: My boxes of failure are all built with CLANG. Oliver From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 14 11:05:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF6C1065672; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:05:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivier@gid0.org) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AADF8FC08; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:05:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so2830647qyk.13 for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 04:05:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.43.205 with SMTP id x13mr1758073qce.240.1313319934478; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 04:05:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.87.10 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 04:05:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E47A0CB.6090002@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <4E454ADD.1020201@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110812171611.GA88850@slackbox.erewhon.net> <20110812182108.GA90173@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E457477.4060400@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110812205408.GA9873@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E45ACA8.5070406@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110813072642.GA24239@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E462D0D.8070901@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110813100810.GA27193@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E4799D4.8000703@gmail.com> <4E47A0CB.6090002@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:05:34 +0200 Message-ID: From: Olivier Smedts To: "Hartmann, O." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Roland Smith , Niclas Zeising , FreeBSD Current , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:05:36 -0000 2011/8/14 Hartmann, O. : > On 08/14/11 11:48, Niclas Zeising wrote: >> >> On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >>>> >>>> On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a43= 1db398.gz >>>>> >>>>> Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are th= e >>>>> permissions et cetera OK? >>>>> >>>>> Roland >>>> >>>> No, it does not. >>>> >>>> What I did so far over night: >>>> >>>> I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again. >>>> Again failure. >>>> After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports). >>>> Everything seems >>>> all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a >>>> non-portsnap-created /usr/ports >>>> and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very >>>> same failure: >>>> >>>> (portsnap fetch extract:) >>>> /usr/ports/devel/cccc/ >>>> /usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/ >>>> /usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/ >>>> /usr/ports/devel/cdash/ >>>> >>>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398= .gz >>>> not >>>> found -- snapshot corrupt. >>> >>> I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is >>> generated >>> by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is lookin= g >>> for a >>> file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is I= MO >>> >>> 1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?) >>> 2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto) >>> 3) tar (ditto) >>> >>> When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks it >>> with >>> tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm >>> ${SNAPSHOTHASH}.tgz' >>> in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an >>> 8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar. =A0If so, that would be a bug! >>> >>> Roland >> >> Just a "me too!". It happens for me on a recently updated 9-current >> virtual machine, built with clang. >> Regards! > > Just got a notebook, build with the old gcc 4.2 of the system FreeBSD > 9.0/amd64 -r224579: portsnap works as expected. > > I will build a most recent system on that box (with systems's outdated gc= c > 4.2) and I'll report if the problem is still present. > > By the way: My boxes of failure are all built with CLANG. > > Oliver Trying again today, with my 9.0-BETA1 amd64 box built with clang. Not the same error, but the same kind when using "portsnap extract" : /usr/ports/lang/p5-JavaScript-Value-Escape/ /usr/ports/lang/p5-JavaScript/ /usr/ports/lang/p5-List-MoreUtils/ /usr/ports/lang/p5-Modern-Perl/ /usr/ports/lang/p5-POE-Component-Hailo/ files/b54a58da6d23d31f19a9105f70af03ef797aba8db6bdbc03d6deb72e62011d56.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt. This file is not present in /var/db/portsnap/files/. # ll /var/db/portsnap/files/ | wc -l 22862 This was after removing /var/db/portsnap/files/ and /var/db/portsnap/t* and a fresh "portsnap fetch", on the portsnap5 mirror. # fetch http://portsnap5.freebsd.org/s/c9a2c992e8bde0c98309f76a0ecfb00eb765= 58c7c3dcbd0405a88316b775e66b.tgz # tar tf c9a2c992e8bde0c98309f76a0ecfb00eb76558c7c3dcbd0405a88316b775e66b.t= gz | grep b54a58 nothing... I tried on portsnap2 and the file was not present in c9a2c992e8bde0c98309f76a0ecfb00eb76558c7c3dcbd0405a88316b775e66b.tgz --=20 Olivier Smedts=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0 _ =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0= =A0 ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) e-mail: olivier@gid0.org=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 - against HTML email & vCards=A0 X www: http://www.gid0.org=A0 =A0 - against proprietary attachments / \ =A0 "Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : =A0 ceux qui comprennent le binaire, =A0 et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas." From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 14 11:25:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id 4CF7E1065672; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:25:34 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: Niclas Zeising Message-ID: <20110814112534.GA58077@freebsd.org> References: <20110812171611.GA88850@slackbox.erewhon.net> <20110812182108.GA90173@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E457477.4060400@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110812205408.GA9873@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E45ACA8.5070406@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110813072642.GA24239@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E462D0D.8070901@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110813100810.GA27193@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E4799D4.8000703@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E4799D4.8000703@gmail.com> Cc: Roland Smith , Olivier Smedts , FreeBSD Current , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "Hartmann, O." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:25:34 -0000 On Sun Aug 14 11, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > >> On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote: > >>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > >>>> On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > >>>>>>>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz > >>> Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the > >>> permissions et cetera OK? > >>> > >>> Roland > >> > >> No, it does not. > >> > >> What I did so far over night: > >> > >> I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again. > >> Again failure. > >> After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports). > >> Everything seems > >> all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a > >> non-portsnap-created /usr/ports > >> and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very > >> same failure: > >> > >> (portsnap fetch extract:) > >> /usr/ports/devel/cccc/ > >> /usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/ > >> /usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/ > >> /usr/ports/devel/cdash/ > >> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not > >> found -- snapshot corrupt. > > > > I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is generated > > by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is looking for a > > file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is IMO > > > > 1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?) > > 2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto) > > 3) tar (ditto) > > > > When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks it with > > tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm ${SNAPSHOTHASH}.tgz' > > in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an > > 8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar. If so, that would be a bug! > > > > Roland > > Just a "me too!". It happens for me on a recently updated 9-current > virtual machine, built with clang. same here: /usr/ports/databases/gigabase/ /usr/ports/databases/godis/ files/39644d98f9e9b9d9a362cbfc075a996683e8a611a4362d883247c9a2e2fa2658.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt. running r224841 on amd64 built with base clang. > Regards! > -- > Niclas From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 14 11:39:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF240106564A; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:39:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A028FC08; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:39:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.net (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7EBdKuK088077; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:39:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5C03FBAA0; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:39:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:39:20 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Olivier Smedts Message-ID: <20110814113920.GA89946@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: <20110812182108.GA90173@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E457477.4060400@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110812205408.GA9873@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E45ACA8.5070406@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110813072642.GA24239@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E462D0D.8070901@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110813100810.GA27193@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E4799D4.8000703@gmail.com> <4E47A0CB.6090002@zedat.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: Niclas Zeising , FreeBSD Current , "Hartmann, O." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:39:53 -0000 --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 01:05:34PM +0200, Olivier Smedts wrote: > > Just got a notebook, build with the old gcc 4.2 of the system FreeBSD > > 9.0/amd64 -r224579: portsnap works as expected. > > > > I will build a most recent system on that box (with systems's outdated = gcc > > 4.2) and I'll report if the problem is still present. > > > > By the way: My boxes of failure are all built with CLANG. > > > > Oliver >=20 > Trying again today, with my 9.0-BETA1 amd64 box built with clang. >=20 > Not the same error, but the same kind when using "portsnap extract" : > /usr/ports/lang/p5-JavaScript-Value-Escape/ > /usr/ports/lang/p5-JavaScript/ > /usr/ports/lang/p5-List-MoreUtils/ > /usr/ports/lang/p5-Modern-Perl/ > /usr/ports/lang/p5-POE-Component-Hailo/ > files/b54a58da6d23d31f19a9105f70af03ef797aba8db6bdbc03d6deb72e62011d56.gz > not found -- snapshot corrupt. >=20 > This file is not present in /var/db/portsnap/files/. >=20 > # ll /var/db/portsnap/files/ | wc -l > 22862 >=20 > This was after removing /var/db/portsnap/files/ and > /var/db/portsnap/t* and a fresh "portsnap fetch", on the portsnap5 > mirror. >=20 > # fetch http://portsnap5.freebsd.org/s/c9a2c992e8bde0c98309f76a0ecfb00eb7= 6558c7c3dcbd0405a88316b775e66b.tgz > # tar tf c9a2c992e8bde0c98309f76a0ecfb00eb76558c7c3dcbd0405a88316b775e66b= =2Etgz > | grep b54a58 > nothing... I tried the same on 8.2-RELEASE amd64, built with gcc 4.2; _also_ nothing! Isn't the name of the snapshot supposed to be the SHA256 of the tarball? because it doesn't match; # sha256 c9a2c992e8bde0c98309f76a0ecfb00eb76558c7c3dcbd0405a88316b775e66b.t= gz=20 SHA256 (c9a2c992e8bde0c98309f76a0ecfb00eb76558c7c3dcbd0405a88316b775e66b.tg= z) =3D c6dee407367784681374dae8375f4c4cdbf425338c7e73cf72c673291d1d0473 # gunzip c9a2c992e8bde0c98309f76a0ecfb00eb76558c7c3dcbd0405a88316b775e66b.t= gz=20 # sha256 c9a2c992e8bde0c98309f76a0ecfb00eb76558c7c3dcbd0405a88316b775e66b.t= ar=20 SHA256 (c9a2c992e8bde0c98309f76a0ecfb00eb76558c7c3dcbd0405a88316b775e66b.ta= r) =3D f49e05296accfc0457a89157288039eb212f6e57b2d694e05ca09f9f5c1e69f6 The mystery deepens... Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk5Hs+gACgkQEnfvsMMhpyUVqACdF5K+DvEMMvrT4FUam/dO65m8 JfsAn32gaSY08dTSVQXtxyUwmMtOmRMc =0tru -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 14 13:08:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD431065672; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:08:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivier@gid0.org) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0578FC13; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:08:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwc9 with SMTP id 9so2835059qwc.13 for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 06:08:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.95.84 with SMTP id c20mr1783681qcn.278.1313327316053; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 06:08:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.87.10 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 06:08:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110814112534.GA58077@freebsd.org> References: <20110812171611.GA88850@slackbox.erewhon.net> <20110812182108.GA90173@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E457477.4060400@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110812205408.GA9873@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E45ACA8.5070406@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110813072642.GA24239@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E462D0D.8070901@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110813100810.GA27193@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E4799D4.8000703@gmail.com> <20110814112534.GA58077@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 15:08:35 +0200 Message-ID: From: Olivier Smedts To: Alexander Best Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Niclas Zeising , Roland Smith , FreeBSD Current , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "Hartmann, O." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:08:37 -0000 2011/8/14 Alexander Best : > On Sun Aug 14 11, Niclas Zeising wrote: >> On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote: >> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >> >> On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >> >>>> On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote: >> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >> >>>>>>>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a4= 31db398.gz >> >>> Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are t= he >> >>> permissions et cetera OK? >> >>> >> >>> Roland >> >> >> >> No, it does not. >> >> >> >> What I did so far over night: >> >> >> >> I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again= . >> >> Again failure. >> >> After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports). >> >> Everything seems >> >> all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a >> >> non-portsnap-created /usr/ports >> >> and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very >> >> same failure: >> >> >> >> (portsnap fetch extract:) >> >> /usr/ports/devel/cccc/ >> >> /usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/ >> >> /usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/ >> >> /usr/ports/devel/cdash/ >> >> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db39= 8.gz not >> >> found -- snapshot corrupt. >> > >> > I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is g= enerated >> > by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is looki= ng for a >> > file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is = IMO >> > >> > 1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?) >> > 2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto) >> > 3) tar (ditto) >> > >> > When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks i= t with >> > tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm ${SNAPSHOTHA= SH}.tgz' >> > in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an >> > 8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar. =A0If so, that would be a bug! >> > >> > Roland >> >> Just a "me too!". It happens for me on a recently updated 9-current >> virtual machine, built with clang. > > same here: > > /usr/ports/databases/gigabase/ > /usr/ports/databases/godis/ > files/39644d98f9e9b9d9a362cbfc075a996683e8a611a4362d883247c9a2e2fa2658.gz= not found -- snapshot corrupt. > > running r224841 on amd64 built with base clang. Aparently fixed with latest HEAD *kernel* : # svn log -v -r224842 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r224842 | rwatson | 2011-08-13 18:03:40 +0200 (sam 13 ao=FB 2011) | 10 lign= es Chemins modifi=E9s=A0: M /head/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c When falloc() was broken into separate falloc_noinstall() and finstall(), a bug was introduced in kern_openat() such that the error from the vnode open operation was overwritten before it was passed as an argument to dupfdopen(). This broke operations on /dev/{stdin,stdout,stderr}. Fix by preserving the original error number across finstall() so that it is still available. Approved by: re (kib) Reported by: cognet ------------------------------------------------------------------------ You won't be able to buildworld with the buggy kernel, but you can buildkernel and reboot on the new kernel. No problems with portsnap after that (don't know if you have to clean the old portsnap files, I did it). --=20 Olivier Smedts=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0 _ =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0= =A0 ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) e-mail: olivier@gid0.org=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 - against HTML email & vCards=A0 X www: http://www.gid0.org=A0 =A0 - against proprietary attachments / \ =A0 "Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : =A0 ceux qui comprennent le binaire, =A0 et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas." From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 14 13:20:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CAD6106566C for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:20:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rihad@mail.ru) Received: from fallback5.mail.ru (fallback5.mail.ru [94.100.176.59]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED648FC0A for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp5.mail.ru (smtp5.mail.ru [94.100.176.132]) by fallback5.mail.ru (mPOP.Fallback_MX) with ESMTP id 9F7695981449 for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 17:04:58 +0400 (MSD) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ru; s=mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=FdT6Xo4HfMe4eJ/C5ywkaIXg535Xx8VsFgagoePD25w=; b=v+7Hq1SIjCsdgKFytujggZH3QqrT3p47b6106WlBj6fnATtlwiw9jZsEfQ5BhPJj9VQfIKQ1o/6u03mAqZfVvy83Yj0OhBv+y1pqwiKzlcW/l3SVk0/BoCWfBIuvHFs9; Received: from [217.25.27.27] (port=42759 helo=[217.25.27.27]) by smtp5.mail.ru with asmtp id 1QsaN6-0003d9-00 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 17:04:56 +0400 Message-ID: <4E47C7F7.9030001@mail.ru> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 18:04:55 +0500 From: rihad User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected X-Mras: Ok Subject: PostgreSQL 9.0.4 %%PG_USER%% not changed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:20:28 -0000 Hi, I have installed the latest postgresql-server-9.0.4_2 postgresql-client-9.0.4_1 In several places, namely in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/postgresql: postgresql_user=${postgresql_user:-"%%PG_USER%%"} and throughout all of /usr/local/etc/periodic/daily/502.pgsql %%PG_USER%% is left as is, which should have presumably been changed to pgsql by the installation script. What gives? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 14 13:38:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id 2CBBE10656A7; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:38:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:38:14 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: Olivier Smedts Message-ID: <20110814133814.GA77936@freebsd.org> References: <20110812182108.GA90173@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E457477.4060400@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110812205408.GA9873@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E45ACA8.5070406@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110813072642.GA24239@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E462D0D.8070901@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110813100810.GA27193@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E4799D4.8000703@gmail.com> <20110814112534.GA58077@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Cc: Niclas Zeising , Roland Smith , FreeBSD Current , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "Hartmann, O." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:38:14 -0000 On Sun Aug 14 11, Olivier Smedts wrote: > 2011/8/14 Alexander Best : > > On Sun Aug 14 11, Niclas Zeising wrote: > >> On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote: > >> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > >> >> On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote: > >> >>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > >> >>>> On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote: > >> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > >> >>>>>>>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz > >> >>> Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the > >> >>> permissions et cetera OK? > >> >>> > >> >>> Roland > >> >> > >> >> No, it does not. > >> >> > >> >> What I did so far over night: > >> >> > >> >> I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again. > >> >> Again failure. > >> >> After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports). > >> >> Everything seems > >> >> all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a > >> >> non-portsnap-created /usr/ports > >> >> and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very > >> >> same failure: > >> >> > >> >> (portsnap fetch extract:) > >> >> /usr/ports/devel/cccc/ > >> >> /usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/ > >> >> /usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/ > >> >> /usr/ports/devel/cdash/ > >> >> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not > >> >> found -- snapshot corrupt. > >> > > >> > I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is generated > >> > by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is looking for a > >> > file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is IMO > >> > > >> > 1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?) > >> > 2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto) > >> > 3) tar (ditto) > >> > > >> > When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks it with > >> > tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm ${SNAPSHOTHASH}.tgz' > >> > in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an > >> > 8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar.  If so, that would be a bug! > >> > > >> > Roland > >> > >> Just a "me too!". It happens for me on a recently updated 9-current > >> virtual machine, built with clang. > > > > same here: > > > > /usr/ports/databases/gigabase/ > > /usr/ports/databases/godis/ > > files/39644d98f9e9b9d9a362cbfc075a996683e8a611a4362d883247c9a2e2fa2658.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt. > > > > running r224841 on amd64 built with base clang. > > Aparently fixed with latest HEAD *kernel* : > > # svn log -v -r224842 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r224842 | rwatson | 2011-08-13 18:03:40 +0200 (sam 13 aoû 2011) | 10 lignes > Chemins modifiés : > M /head/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c > > When falloc() was broken into separate falloc_noinstall() and finstall(), > a bug was introduced in kern_openat() such that the error from the vnode > open operation was overwritten before it was passed as an argument to > dupfdopen(). This broke operations on /dev/{stdin,stdout,stderr}. Fix > by preserving the original error number across finstall() so that it is > still available. > > Approved by: re (kib) > Reported by: cognet > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > You won't be able to buildworld with the buggy kernel, but you can > buildkernel and reboot on the new kernel. No problems with portsnap > after that (don't know if you have to clean the old portsnap files, I > did it). thanks. switching to a newer revision alone didn't solve the issue. however after doing rm -r /var/db/portsnap/files/; rm /var/db/portsnap/t*; portsnap fetch update everything's back to normal. :) > > -- > Olivier Smedts                                                 _ >                                         ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) > e-mail: olivier@gid0.org        - against HTML email & vCards  X > www: http://www.gid0.org    - against proprietary attachments / \ > >   "Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : >   ceux qui comprennent le binaire, >   et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas." From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 14 16:27:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0FF7106564A for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 16:27:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from spartan.hamla.org (spartan.hamla.org [206.251.255.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89CC28FC0A for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 16:27:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229A2170E5; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:27:54 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tandon.net; h= user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:subject:from:from:date:date:received; s=aegis; t= 1313339273; bh=TjIGyUpxaI4jeRKzbRQ7u1F0vwFo1w75FVZGiiE/XW0=; b=b II4c1Q/+UEA571f5ur+3EPe8eCcBJc3IUAcnuy4UMA0JlkzivROWDguZDasFFMyR P2Bp2xWYtWWkWRu6lPlamrgbEftlk3uUDLnK8HyAhrJ9cXJdp6FP7lD05w0ag8rB HlBvTxffXRsXZSU8oauK8VfbczU31wkJ909STcv5Ac= X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at spartan.hamla.org Received: from spartan.hamla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spartan.hamla.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with LMTP id pBZFRITf5AwR; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:27:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:27:21 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110814162721.GA2609@magic.hamla.org> References: <4E47C7F7.9030001@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E47C7F7.9030001@mail.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: girgen@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.0.4 %%PG_USER%% not changed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 16:27:25 -0000 [ mantainer added to Cc: ] On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 18:04:55 +0500, rihad wrote: > Hi, I have installed the latest > postgresql-server-9.0.4_2 > postgresql-client-9.0.4_1 > > In several places, namely in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/postgresql: > postgresql_user=${postgresql_user:-"%%PG_USER%%"} > > and throughout all of /usr/local/etc/periodic/daily/502.pgsql > > %%PG_USER%% is left as is, which should have presumably been changed > to pgsql by the installation script. > What gives? Based on a quick glance, it seems that the expansion does occur because PG_USER is not set in SUB_LIST. -- Sahil Tandon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 14 20:01:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209DF1065708; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 20:01:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@e-e.com) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7AD8FC1B; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 20:01:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75896FDF6C; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:42:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=e-e.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :user-agent:from:from:subject:subject:date:date:references :in-reply-to:message-id:received:received:received; s=ee; t= 1313350957; x=1315165357; bh=SC5Ci1e8FcM+cuuiom8QGQMJaRo4lS+yROz h0GtuFZY=; b=HodIx2lXeVcrd02kiera6D+Z9xHcJywfBfd35Z9KdSlui2Gb9Qh VNT7pmLur4BSvPXdc8RQn7V7i4JWH2AwdrAKev9JMpE8fa0/CnGmYdSp+dXbd6K+ GyKt6ckxwn3lpQ3ASuaOll72S8Lx+WozzIRjuxTDgSGNzhatg/1MfbCk= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id maEzEbDKL321; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:42:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761456FDF6B; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:42:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 63.201.14.88 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhelfman) by mail.experts-exchange.com with HTTP; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:42:37 -0700 Message-ID: <12cf50a875ef98bf7c7e1c745956eee7.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> In-Reply-To: <20110814162721.GA2609@magic.hamla.org> References: <4E47C7F7.9030001@mail.ru> <20110814162721.GA2609@magic.hamla.org> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:42:37 -0700 From: "Jason Helfman" To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: girgen@freebsd.org, sahil@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.0.4 %%PG_USER%% not changed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 20:01:19 -0000 > [ mantainer added to Cc: ] > > On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 18:04:55 +0500, rihad wrote: > >> Hi, I have installed the latest >> postgresql-server-9.0.4_2 >> postgresql-client-9.0.4_1 >> >> In several places, namely in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/postgresql: >> postgresql_user=${postgresql_user:-"%%PG_USER%%"} >> >> and throughout all of /usr/local/etc/periodic/daily/502.pgsql >> >> %%PG_USER%% is left as is, which should have presumably been changed >> to pgsql by the installation script. >> What gives? > > Based on a quick glance, it seems that the expansion does occur because > PG_USER is not set in SUB_LIST. This commit also changed the ability to configure a different user, as the pgsql isn't part of the base operating system installation, and having a configurable user, group and id, allowed users to change what user was running postgresql as. This is now not the case. This patch was used in addressing this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/153668 The aforementioned PR was submitted as a fix for this PR ( http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/113707 ) which addressed the issue in a non-standard way. I really don't understand why this was done, as this really broke the essence of why this port was changed to support "any" user one would want to run the postgresql server as, and now this functionality is gone. It would be great to see this change back in place so one may run the server as any user they choose, and not just "pgsql," especially since this user isn't in the base system. -jgh From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 14 21:35:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0004A106566C for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:35:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE76C8FC08 for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsd.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.59] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QsiKZ-0001tj-7X for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:34:57 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QsiKN-0005Py-Um for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:34:40 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7ELYdms019739 for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:34:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p7ELYdPq019738 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:34:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:34:39 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110814213439.GD19645@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: commit patch after positive feedback from user X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:35:01 -0000 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152453 I've a positive feedback to the patch from pr originator, confirming that it works fine. Can somebody please commit it. -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 15 08:04:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7FE106566B for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:04:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 552148FC0C for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:04:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iye7 with SMTP id 7so13376669iye.17 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 01:04:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=cGx7sXKpxs9Cka4sk1nTB/LP6lyvgLtp4IDftB+Pkbk=; b=ICM5ewRq/unod40u5FZK+GoiDv4vAe8ZPghJTbL6fCfY8CDSyGD5Q/9cqXfs7V0k0x 7yLAnwoEzNzq3HEMcTBTe61f2tcbuIJQDrFNIceN95ya09O9TZWz4WtSH4KXEWZQE2ki bu3h53h7jcohJ4VZvJmGMU+8V6QVfcGujZRBc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.4.3 with SMTP id 3mr4744493ibp.72.1313395493715; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 01:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.182.77 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 01:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.182.77 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 01:04:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110814213439.GD19645@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20110814213439.GD19645@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:04:53 +0100 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Anton Shterenlikht Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: commit patch after positive feedback from user X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:04:54 -0000 If no-one else has grabbed it by the time I get home, I'll do it. Chris On 14 Aug 2011 22:35, "Anton Shterenlikht" wrote: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152453 > > I've a positive feedback to the patch from pr originator, > confirming that it works fine. > > Can somebody please commit it. > > -- > Anton Shterenlikht > Room 2.6, Queen's Building > Mech Eng Dept > Bristol University > University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK > Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 > Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 15 08:04:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E097C106566C; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:04:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CEFA8FC12; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:04:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-iy0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 7so13376669iye.17 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 01:04:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=R0Me1kQFvI7re0uVNPrcJMeneEcz1lwLOGqYbmbAMwY=; b=GUz+whrj+C1lWs1QL1+LDTPk4/nmrTdISw3wL9A0BACQijFz8JOKAy79K3Y+qkJ7ln pJESg/VO+Lb9I7mFTsNPqEid8xtqOXUJfC9P2a7Enar7tg9atsWXqoBDDgXC6TB2gAEi vopzlN7vKb1cFyVHk0FeBwWzU1Tzr4pAKWETk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.4.99 with SMTP id 35mr7143185ibq.85.1313395495380; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 01:04:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.182.77 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 01:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.182.77 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 01:04:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <12cf50a875ef98bf7c7e1c745956eee7.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> References: <4E47C7F7.9030001@mail.ru> <20110814162721.GA2609@magic.hamla.org> <12cf50a875ef98bf7c7e1c745956eee7.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:04:53 +0100 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Jason Helfman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: girgen@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, sahil@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.0.4 %%PG_USER%% not changed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:04:56 -0000 This might be my fault, I'll invest8gate. Sorry. On 14 Aug 2011 21:02, "Jason Helfman" wrote: >> [ mantainer added to Cc: ] >> >> On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 18:04:55 +0500, rihad wrote: >> >>> Hi, I have installed the latest >>> postgresql-server-9.0.4_2 >>> postgresql-client-9.0.4_1 >>> >>> In several places, namely in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/postgresql: >>> postgresql_user=${postgresql_user:-"%%PG_USER%%"} >>> >>> and throughout all of /usr/local/etc/periodic/daily/502.pgsql >>> >>> %%PG_USER%% is left as is, which should have presumably been changed >>> to pgsql by the installation script. >>> What gives? >> >> Based on a quick glance, it seems that the expansion does occur because >> PG_USER is not set in SUB_LIST. > > This commit also changed the ability to configure a different user, as the > pgsql isn't part of the base operating system installation, and having a > configurable user, group and id, allowed users to change what user was > running postgresql as. This is now not the case. This patch was used in > addressing this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/153668 > > The aforementioned PR was submitted as a fix for this PR ( > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/113707 ) which addressed > the issue in a non-standard way. > > I really don't understand why this was done, as this really broke the > essence of why this port was changed to support "any" user one would want > to run the postgresql server as, and now this functionality is gone. > > It would be great to see this change back in place so one may run the > server as any user they choose, and not just "pgsql," especially since > this user isn't in the base system. > > -jgh > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 15 09:59:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07AC01065670 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:59:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from urb@twe.net) Received: from xerox.twe.net (0107ds2-ba.0.fullrate.dk [90.184.98.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FBC8FC0C for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:59:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from xerox.twe.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xerox.twe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D106D41C for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:40:43 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at twe.net Received: from xerox.twe.net ([127.0.0.1]) by xerox.twe.net (xerox.twe.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KDlIA65E0b05 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:40:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by xerox.twe.net (Postfix, from userid 80) id 520FE6D429; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:40:23 +0200 (CEST) To: X-PHP-Script: www.twe.net/webmail/index.php for 217.74.219.156 X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:func.inc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:40:22 +0200 From: "Uffe R. B. Andersen" Organization: Andersen|nu Mail-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-Sender: urb@twe.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.5.3 Subject: net-snmp-5.7_2 issue with X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: urb@twe.net List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:59:14 -0000 Hi, Since upgrading to version 5.7, the Gauge32 of .1.3.6.1.2.1.6.9.0 (TCP-MIB::tcpCurrEstab.0) only returns zero. The issue exists on at least 8.2-RELEASE-p2 and 7.4-RELEASE. While the free diskspace issue seems fixed in 5.7_2, this problem is still there. -- Med venlig hilsen - Sincerely Uffe R. B. Andersen - mailto:urb@twe.net http://blog.andersen.nu/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 15 11:06:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683831065674 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:06:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6058FC13 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7FB66HH013942 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:06:06 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p7FB652l013940 for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:06:05 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:06:05 GMT Message-Id: <201108151106.p7FB652l013940@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: FreeBSD ports list Cc: Subject: Current unassigned ports problem reports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:06:06 -0000 (Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- f ports/159786 [patch] upgrade of security/ossec-hids-server and secu f ports/159785 dns/libidn: libidn-1.22 cannot install: Unknown compon o ports/159783 [MAINTAINER] net-mgmt/nfdump: update to 1.6.4 o ports/159781 [maintainer update] www/subsonic to 4.5 o ports/159776 [patch] www/subsonic: deprecation of www/tomcat41, upd o ports/159772 [patch] Upgrade lang/jruby to latest version, JRuby 1. o ports/159770 New port: net-mgmt/massh o ports/159769 New port: shells/ambit o ports/159766 cannnot execute sysutil/ezjail on 9.0 BETA1 o ports/159760 New port: devel/libparserutils A library useful when w o ports/159748 comms/rxtx installs improperly with openjdk7 o ports/159747 New port: sysutlis/wiimms : Wii and GameCube ISO Tools o ports/159743 update port databases/dalmp o ports/159735 [patch] adopt and update comms/rxtx o ports/159732 port update: sysutils/cpulimit o ports/159728 sysutils/htop-0.9.0_1 is broken (does not show process f ports/159719 [UPDATE] devel/py-zopeInterface: update to 3.6.5 o ports/159703 NEW PORT: Apache Libcloud 0.5.2 o ports/159668 math/pari update o ports/159656 bsd.database.mk fails to locate installed bdb51 librar o ports/159639 [patch] finance/ledger: update to 2.6.3 o ports/159636 [patch] net/freevrrpd: RC script for freevrrpd that co o ports/159631 New port: sysutils/amount FreeBSD specific auto mount o ports/159626 New port: dns/radns IPv6 DNS server address autoconfig f ports/159619 net-mgmt/netams install cgi scripts without exec permi o ports/159608 www/apache22: apache WITH_BDB_BASE settings described f ports/159607 Update port: graphic/mahotas Efficient Image Processin o ports/159605 Change port version: deskutils/x-tile A tiling applica o ports/159575 [new port] games/stockfish: open source chess engine f ports/159560 [PATCH] devel/php-xdebug: update to 2.1.2 o ports/159550 audo/freeswitch-sounds: update to latest version, othe o ports/159549 [New Port] graphics/ocrfeeder o ports/159544 [New Port] graphics/py-imaging-sane f ports/159526 [PATCH] update to x11-fonts/terminus-font f ports/159516 [patch] Port comms/mlan3 update to 310r2 version o ports/159515 [MAINTAINER] net-mgmt/zabbix-server: update to 1.8.6 f ports/159514 [PATCH] www/pivotx: Added php5-tokenizer as a requirem f ports/159409 [PATCH] devel/py-boto: update to 2.0 o ports/159393 [New port] x11/gnome-color-chooser: customize appearan o ports/159392 [New port] x11-themes/gnome-icons-elementary: Elementa o ports/159381 update lang/php52 o ports/159378 [NEW PORT] lang/php-plua: PLua is a PHP extension whic o ports/159372 new port: net/opennx o ports/159361 sysutils/fusefs-kmod doesn't compile o ports/159325 new port: emulators/joytran f ports/159322 [PATCH] sysutils/fusefs-kmod doesn't build due to rece o ports/159319 databases/postgresql-plpython doesn't build with postg f ports/159313 sysutils/uhidd: uhidd-devd.conf.sample doesn't work o ports/159302 New port:math/geogebra - software for math and geometr o ports/159269 [new port] www/axis2: Provides a Web Services,SOAP and f ports/159249 [patch] multimedia/libva: update to 1.0.14 f ports/159245 sysutils/duplicity updated to 0.6.14 o ports/159242 New port: sysutils/fuse-zip FUSE filesystem to mount Z f ports/159230 [PATCH] fix sysutils/fusefs-kmod for the 64bit mount f a ports/159223 [PATCH] net-mgmt/collectd: update to 5.0.0 o ports/159221 sysutils/ezjail: ezjail-admin command, console option f ports/159218 [patch] update multimedia/ffmpegthumbnailer to 2.0.7, o ports/159217 New port: devel/goprotobuf - Protocol buffers for Go f ports/159213 [patch] net-mgmt/nfdump: update to 1.6.4 o ports/159209 databases/pear-MDB2_Driver_sqlite: the MDB2 SQLite dri f ports/159205 net-mgmt/zabbix-agent: No active checks on server: hos o ports/159204 net-mgmt/zabbix-server - graphs drawn with no data o ports/159187 [patch] sysutils/am-utils patch to add nolockd to nfs f ports/159177 sysutils/muse on 8.2-STABLE o ports/159168 Update port german/tipp10 to current program version o ports/159152 New port: sysutils/battray o ports/159121 net/freevrrpd: Make adv_int a runtime configurable opt f ports/159108 sysutils/fusefs-smbnetfs update to 0.5.3 o ports/159102 sysutils/fusefs-kmod: fusefs daemonizes before mount i o ports/159083 [NEW PORT] www/py27-django_compressor: Compresses link f ports/159050 PORT graphics/fotoxx Makefile update o ports/159025 New port: www/py-tornado2 - An open source scalable, n o ports/159007 New ports: print/linux-f10-cups-libs, security/linux-f s ports/158983 [NEW PORT] devel/pecl-dtrace: PHP DTrace provider o ports/158980 New port: net/py-msrplib Python MSRP client library f ports/158968 Update port: lang/mosh version 0.2.7 o ports/158948 [patch] dns/py-namebench: update to 1.3.1 f ports/158935 [PATCH] print/lpr-wrapper: update to 0.7 o ports/158931 print/perlftlib is not built with perl5.14 o ports/158929 emulators/desmume updated to 0.9.7 f ports/158927 [PATCH] quick patch for ports/math/asir2000 to work o ports/158925 New Port: audio/pithos GNOME Pandora player f ports/158916 [PATCH] textproc/ctpp2: update to 2.7.1 a ports/158910 [PATCH] sysutils/battmond: update to 0.3 f ports/158907 [PATCH] www/interchange: update to 5.6.3 o ports/158906 New port: devel/py-xcaplib Python XCAP client library f ports/158898 [PATCH] www/libecap: update to 0.2.0 f ports/158897 [PATCH] net/phamm: update to 0.5.18 f ports/158889 [PATCH] sysutils/ucspi-proxy: update to 0.98 o ports/158878 [patch] textproc/dadadodo assumes long is 32 bits o ports/158875 New port: devel/py-application Basic building blocks f f ports/158824 devel/flyspray: share/flyspray/flyspray.conf.php remai f ports/158799 [PATCH] devel/pear-PHPUnit: update to new pear channel o ports/158791 Update security/openvas-* o ports/158781 New port: games/drcreep Platform Puzzle Game f ports/158731 sysutils/byobu wants module "snack" o ports/158704 New port: mail/mailfromd o ports/158703 New port: mail/mailutils o ports/158647 audio/bebocd: request for marking it BROKEN and DEPREC o ports/158624 [update] www/xpi-downthemall 1.1.10 to 2.0.7 o ports/158622 [update] www/xpi-torbutton 1.2.5 to 1.4.0 o ports/158600 [maintainer-update] games/ioquake3-devel and slaves f ports/158533 [NEW PORT] devel/tiled: 2D game map editor f ports/158501 [patch] multimedia/mplayer: faad dependency problem o ports/158428 net/xwhois: request for marking it BROKEN and DEPRECAT f ports/158403 New port: mail/dovecot2-deleted-to-trash-plugin: dovec o ports/158204 [PATCH] java/jde: update to 2.4.0.1 o ports/158179 some packages do not fully honor -P dir option in pkg_ o ports/158167 [NEW PORT] databases/percona-server: Multithreaded SQL o ports/158044 Multiple net/iaxmodem instances started o ports/158020 deprecate net-p2p/gift and dependent ports o ports/157791 audo/midimountain fails to copy all xpm files and fail o ports/157738 New port: net/py-ldaptor o ports/157719 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-CheckPing: Provides nagios o ports/157715 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-libvirt: Provides monitori o ports/157505 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-DeviceSearch: Provides the o ports/157504 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-NetApp: Provides monitorin o ports/157503 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-InterfaceGraphs: Provides f ports/157494 lang/ezm3 fails to compile o ports/157320 [NEW PORT] databases/pecl-pdo_user: PECL classes provi o ports/157301 [New port] net-mgmt/zbxlog: Syslog server receives mes o ports/157282 [MAINTAINER PATCH] net/xrdp: effective login name is n o ports/157197 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-deviceAdvDetail: Provides o ports/157196 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-DellMon: Provides addition o ports/157194 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-NtpMonitor: Monitors the o o ports/157191 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-MACReport: Lists MAC addre o ports/157190 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-GraphPortlet: Enables user o ports/157176 [patch] sysutils/heartbeat crashes when clock_t (signe o ports/157136 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-Domain: Provides expiratio o ports/157135 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-DellMonitor: Provides Zeno o ports/157133 [new port] net-mgmt/zenpack-ApacheMonitor: Provides pe f ports/157109 conflict between net/netpipes and sysutils/timelimit f ports/157107 conflict between mail/p5-Mail-SPF and mail/libspf2 o ports/157092 [PATCH] audio/thunar-media-tags-plugin, broken with li f ports/157044 x11-toolkits/slgtk: fails to start f ports/157021 multimedia/mplayer: does not build with multimedia/lib o ports/157014 devel/jam: does not compile on FreeBSD 9.0 CURRENT/amd o ports/156834 New port: games/fairymax-devel latest version of games o ports/156791 New port: security/py-kerberos Python bindings for ker f ports/156747 multimedia/mplayer: fix 24-bits OSS + some improvement o ports/156737 [patch] www/squid31: squid.in startup script fixes to o ports/156693 [PATCH] security/hmap: refine this port a bit o ports/156629 [patch] sysutils/puppet patch to use PACKAGEROOT inste o ports/156539 [NEW PORT] print/frescobaldi: A music score editor for o ports/156472 [new port] devel/ocaml-react - OCaml library for react f ports/156376 [PATCH] graphics/optipng: update to 0.6.5 o ports/156362 New port: games/rftg Race for the Galaxy AI o ports/156343 multimedia/xbmc 10.1_1 mp3 playback problem - CALSADir o ports/156313 [patch][new port] astro/gkrellsun2 (Gkrellm2 Plugin) f ports/156252 New port: devel/radar Opensource tools to disasm, debu f ports/156171 port multimedia/mplayer patch-libao2-ao_oss.c is incor f ports/156143 New port: devel/arduino-mk: Build Arduino sketches fro o ports/156119 x11-fonts/font-manager: ignore a problem caused by the f ports/156075 [new port] graphics/openfst: library for constructing, f ports/156034 print/lyx-devel spell checking with enchant does not w o ports/156002 New port: sysutils/pefs-kmod kernel level stacked cryp f ports/155941 mwserv library support is not included in nepenthes.co f ports/155898 Update port devel/libthai o ports/155788 ports security/cfsd startup -- multiple problems f ports/155697 ports-mgmt/pkg_replace doesn't want to replace java/op o ports/155593 lang/mpd .16.1 ignores embedded cue sheets in FLAC fil f ports/155592 polish/ekg, after polish/libgadu update, contacts are o ports/155570 [patch] devel/py-twistedCore: update to 10.2.0 and oth f ports/155547 java/jboss5 port build failure o ports/155538 new port devel/radlib radlib developer library. Event- o ports/155447 Update ports: net-p2p/eiskaltdcpp-* to 2.2.1, New port f ports/155404 [PATCH] mail/mutt-devel: doesn't build in presence of f ports/155306 multimedia/openshot doesn't work o ports/155225 plz split antlr2 and antlr3 ports. not update antlr2 - o ports/155166 update deskutils/org-mode.el to 7.4 o ports/155120 Update of port devel/php-libawl f ports/155115 devel/doxygen: dependancy loop o ports/155070 NEW PORT: games/CastleVox - new fast strategy board ga f ports/154973 [PATCH] security/ike: fix plist when QTGUI=off, respec o ports/154711 security/heimdal: kadmin: hdb_open: hdb_open failed in o ports/154682 net/iaxmodem: add rc script for running more than 1 ia o ports/154548 textproc/pootle: Pootle's rc.d script don't take into f ports/154546 update port: games/gemrb to version 0.6.3 o ports/154401 New port: www/jetty7 - newer fork by Eclipse/Codehaus o ports/154285 [NEW PORT] java/netty: Java NIO client server framewor o ports/154254 [patch] asmail imap login broken with gmail at al. o ports/154217 New port: ports-mgmt/portsreinstall o ports/154202 New port: security/scannedonly - A Samba VFS virus sca o ports/154031 New port: audio/shoutcast2: SHOUTcast Distributed Netw o ports/153926 New port net/freeswitch-snapshot o ports/153810 [PATCH] Fix usb_interrupt_read() in devel/libusb for f o ports/153612 Update devel/arm-elf-binutils to version 2.17 o ports/153607 Update devel/djgpp-binutils to version 2.17 o ports/153437 [patch] emulators/dgen-sdl: mark BROKEN on non-i386 ar o ports/153429 [patch] Fix explicite uses of unzip in ports o ports/153425 [PATCH] www/limesurvey: Added a switch to use PostgreS o ports/153287 [PATCH] net-mgmt/ndpmon: [SUMMARIZE CHANGES] o ports/153130 sysutils/k3b: problem with k3b and mounting ntfs with o ports/152982 [patch] net/nss_ldap, ignore option nss_initgroups_ign f ports/152915 russian/xmms v. 1.2.11_12 don't see cdinfo and tag's i o ports/152453 textproc/urlview port should install gecko.sh optional o ports/152376 New port: audio/lastfmsubmitd o ports/152236 [patch] x11/slim: Enable pam support, add hald and dbu s ports/152195 [PATCH] deskutils/pinot update to xapian-core 1.2.3 f ports/152192 [PATCH] databases/xapian-bindings update to 1.2.3 o ports/152191 [PATCH] databases/xapian-core update to 1.2.3 o ports/152118 New port: deskutils/linux-tahometer A worktime trackin o ports/151930 [PATCH] net-mgmt/netams links to libmysqlclient/libpq f ports/151783 mail/fetchmail: rc.d script broken in case of MDA use o ports/151747 new port: emulators/wine-fbsd64: request for (a variat f ports/151637 Update port: security/maia Much needed updates for Per o ports/151318 [repocopy][new port] x11-wm/stumpwm: rename to x11-wm/ o ports/151296 [patch] ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod build fails: MNT_NF f ports/150783 mail/qpopper: fails to configure ocasionally o ports/150425 www/squid31: rc.d/squid's squid_fib setting ineffectiv f ports/150316 new port: net/neatx f ports/150235 sysutils/smartmontools build system bug o ports/150194 There is no startup script for databases/cassandra f ports/150169 www/havp: Assertion failed: file llvm/lib/System/Mutex o ports/150086 [NEW PORT] net-im/tkabber-plugins-devel: External Plug o ports/149947 [NEW PORT] devel/smartCVS, a powerful graphical CVS cl o ports/149564 patch for various games/ adding appropriate LICENSEs t o ports/149538 sysutils/fusefs-ntfs panic on writte on 8.1 f ports/148871 bad packages: p5-XML-Parser-2.36_1 p5-XML-SAX-Expat-0. o ports/147943 New port: net/radsecproxy Radsecproxy is a generic RAD s ports/147829 Improved net/ucarp startup script: multiple VHID and F s ports/147169 bsd.ruby.mk: Adding GEM_ARGS o ports/143566 sysutils/diskcheckd runs constantly when using gmirror a ports/139203 sysutils/freebsd-snapshot more careful patch not depen o ports/137378 Advisory locks fail with ports/security/cfs on FreeBSD o ports/133563 security/cfs rc script needs "mntudp" option on 8-CURR f ports/122333 net/arping - patch to lookup for interface and src ip, o ports/57498 HEIMDAL_HOME should be defined in src or ports Makefil 228 problems total. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 15 14:56:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8141065673; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:56:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12A18FC15; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:56:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iye7 with SMTP id 7so14137365iye.17 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 07:56:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pfOzNdJoiLiG12XAVE4tjels/F0tMV0VGl6QTPjs5e4=; b=Ixa5zBEFYvcOvt5tXz0LM4N8Hl7AEJQNMKraB6xx1QMt2FToe6strgkc4Uf3HeMWiA btvBL55hXlWw30uoYFa+NnV5WxJrhmTJ/mrhwld8pqTTlaaFzj6ea0Ox1n/bYuqt/X/l 0fLocXohijnLB2/GBchOzFpjBEQNoOvojRfjc= Received: by 10.43.53.73 with SMTP id vp9mr4280482icb.415.1313420212147; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 07:56:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.182.77 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 07:56:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E47C7F7.9030001@mail.ru> <20110814162721.GA2609@magic.hamla.org> <12cf50a875ef98bf7c7e1c745956eee7.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:56:22 +0100 Message-ID: To: Jason Helfman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: girgen@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, sahil@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.0.4 %%PG_USER%% not changed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:56:53 -0000 On 15 August 2011 09:04, Chris Rees wrote: > This might be my fault, I'll invest8gate. Sorry. > > On 14 Aug 2011 21:02, "Jason Helfman" wrote: >>> [ mantainer added to Cc: ] >>> >>> On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 18:04:55 +0500, rihad wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, I have installed the latest >>>> postgresql-server-9.0.4_2 >>>> postgresql-client-9.0.4_1 >>>> >>>> In several places, namely in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/postgresql: >>>> postgresql_user=3D${postgresql_user:-"%%PG_USER%%"} >>>> >>>> and throughout all of /usr/local/etc/periodic/daily/502.pgsql >>>> >>>> %%PG_USER%% is left as is, which should have presumably been changed >>>> to pgsql by the installation script. >>>> What gives? >>> >>> Based on a quick glance, it seems that the expansion does occur because >>> PG_USER is not set in SUB_LIST. >> >> This commit also changed the ability to configure a different user, as t= he >> pgsql isn't part of the base operating system installation, and having a >> configurable user, group and id, allowed users to change what user was >> running postgresql as. This is now not the case. This patch was used in >> addressing this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/1536= 68 >> >> The aforementioned PR was submitted as a fix for this PR ( >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/113707 ) which addres= sed >> the issue in a non-standard way. >> >> I really don't understand why this was done, as this really broke the >> essence of why this port was changed to support "any" user one would wan= t >> to run the postgresql server as, and now this functionality is gone. >> >> It would be great to see this change back in place so one may run the >> server as any user they choose, and not just "pgsql," especially since >> this user isn't in the base system. >> >> -jgh OK, I've reverted the problem commit (s) [1]. I'm going to take a look at how to do this properly -- we really do need to use the code in bsd.port.mk for creating users rather than using pkg-install files. Rihad, please try csupping / portsnap and check that in postgresql90-server has the line: $FreeBSD: ports/databases/postgresql90-server/Makefile,v 1.222 2011/08/15 14:52:31 crees Exp $ Then reinstall and your problem will be gone. Sorry for the disruption. Chris [1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/2011-August/223423.html --=20 Chris Rees =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| FreeBSD Developer crees@FreeBSD.org =A0 | http://people.freebsd.org/~crees From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 15 15:27:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E509C106566B for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:27:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30F08FC08 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:27:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qsz4S-0000Lq-09 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:27:20 -0700 Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:27:19 -0700 (PDT) From: timp To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1313422039998-4701344.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: net-snmp-5.7_2 issue with X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:27:21 -0000 yea, and sometimes it crashes with 'stack overflow' message -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/net-snmp-5-7-2-issue-with-tp4700460p4701344.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 15 20:50:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAED9106564A for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 20:50:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from mxchg04.rrz.uni-hamburg.de (mxchg04.rrz.uni-hamburg.de [134.100.38.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671A08FC08 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 20:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mxchg04.rrz.uni-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0461EE29A; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:31:52 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by University of Hamburg ( RRZ / mgw01.rrz.uni-hamburg.de ) Received: from mxchg04.rrz.uni-hamburg.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mxchg04.rrz.uni-hamburg.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10424) with ESMTP id UG9ZcNlAbUAu; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:31:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailhost.uni-hamburg.de (mailhost.uni-hamburg.de [134.100.38.99]) by mxchg04.rrz.uni-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:31:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.uni-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491B69000B; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:31:52 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by University of Hamburg (RRZ/mailhost) Received: from mailhost.uni-hamburg.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailhost.uni-hamburg.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id KuZJrq1ZY2k8; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:31:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nb981.math (g224006014.adsl.alicedsl.de [92.224.6.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: fmjv004) by mailhost.uni-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1112B90005; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:31:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E498234.7020009@janh.de> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:31:48 +0200 From: Jan Henrik Sylvester User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110803 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Maintainer timeout for port destroying itself (multimedia/dvdauthor) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 20:50:06 -0000 I have been poking the maintainer of multimedia/dvdauthor three times since the beginning of this year about multimedia/dvdauthor applying a patch to the port itself and thus destroying the port after the second use. Instead of being applied to the port, a patch for the port itself seems to have been copied to the files directory of the port instead. It was later that I found that someone else did report it independently: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/154065 Please, could some committer enforce the maintainer timeout for that pr? Thanks, Jan Henrik From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 15 20:58:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD000106564A for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 20:58:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14F0E8FC13 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 20:58:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2011 20:58:52 -0000 Received: from g227123135.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO apollo.emma.line.org) [92.227.123.135] by mail.gmx.net (mp008) with SMTP; 15 Aug 2011 22:58:52 +0200 X-Authenticated: #428038 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+kBRNT24Kkre5T+1/PMJK60Pyp9hRR1Xz8yDv6gb zcJ/TykAhcgIxT Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3880D23CFA7; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:58:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E49888B.3020607@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:58:51 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Henrik Sylvester References: <4E498234.7020009@janh.de> In-Reply-To: <4E498234.7020009@janh.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: ports-list freebsd Subject: Re: Maintainer timeout for port destroying itself (multimedia/dvdauthor) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 20:58:54 -0000 Am 15.08.2011 22:31, schrieb Jan Henrik Sylvester: > I have been poking the maintainer of multimedia/dvdauthor three times > since the beginning of this year about multimedia/dvdauthor applying a > patch to the port itself and thus destroying the port after the second use. > > Instead of being applied to the port, a patch for the port itself seems > to have been copied to the files directory of the port instead. > > It was later that I found that someone else did report it independently: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/154065 > > Please, could some committer enforce the maintainer timeout for that pr? I'm on it. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 15 21:09:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.emma.line.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E67106564A; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 21:09:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mandree@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B5223CF2B; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 23:09:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E498B11.8010804@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 23:09:37 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Henrik Sylvester , ports-list freebsd References: <4E498234.7020009@janh.de> <4E49888B.3020607@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4E49888B.3020607@gmx.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cpghost@cordula.ws Subject: Re: Maintainer timeout for port destroying itself (multimedia/dvdauthor) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 21:09:39 -0000 Am 15.08.2011 22:58, schrieb Matthias Andree: > Am 15.08.2011 22:31, schrieb Jan Henrik Sylvester: >> I have been poking the maintainer of multimedia/dvdauthor three times >> since the beginning of this year about multimedia/dvdauthor applying a >> patch to the port itself and thus destroying the port after the second use. >> >> Instead of being applied to the port, a patch for the port itself seems >> to have been copied to the files directory of the port instead. >> >> It was later that I found that someone else did report it independently: >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/154065 >> >> Please, could some committer enforce the maintainer timeout for that pr? > > I'm on it. OK. done. I've reset the maintainer of dvdauthor and kino, so that these two are up for grabs. There was an independent request by C. P. Ghost (cc'ed) to upgrade this dvdauthor port to a newer version. I have no interest to handle the actual ports upgrade, is either of you willing to take it? Someone else? Documentation about port upgrades is at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/ and we're happy to help new port maintainers answering questions and giving advice. Thanks, Matthias From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 15 23:58:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8CFB106566C for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 23:58:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepi204.cox.net (eastrmfepi204.cox.net [68.230.241.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7648FC23 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 23:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo03.cox.net ([68.1.16.126]) by eastrmfepo101.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20110815233256.ZATO3909.eastrmfepo101.cox.net@eastrmimpo03.cox.net> for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:32:56 -0400 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.83.25]) by eastrmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id LnYw1h0050YnB6A02nYwkq; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:32:56 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020207.4E49ACA8.00A2,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=mwl0/2xM3ubHJTXa6l4kGPt5l4r2ytuQtfJUKIGJKFg= c=1 sm=1 a=W0zv3UFmrXwA:10 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=2vO5UZG1h46htWAnE/rx2g==:17 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=XoBEgDlDaGeMCMCBvzwA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=2vO5UZG1h46htWAnE/rx2g==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from serene.no-ip.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p7FNWti8090273 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:32:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:32:50 -0500 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20110815183250.69b6560f@serene.no-ip.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.5; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Maintainership request for news/multisuck X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 23:58:39 -0000 Hello, I'd like to assume maintainership of news/multisuck, which currently has no maintainer. I am, in fact, the author of this software package, so it would be a real privilege to also be its maintainer. :-) Thank you. -- Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 16 00:38:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4B6106566C for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:38:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15F98FC18 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:38:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 23AC15615B; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:38:58 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:38:58 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: "Conrad J. Sabatier" Message-ID: <20110816003858.GB27914@lonesome.com> References: <20110815183250.69b6560f@serene.no-ip.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110815183250.69b6560f@serene.no-ip.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Maintainership request for news/multisuck X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:38:58 -0000 Done. In general it's more effective to send-pr rather than post to the mailing list, which is such high-traffic. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 16 04:21:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3108106566B for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 04:21:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rihad@mail.ru) Received: from smtp14.mail.ru (smtp14.mail.ru [94.100.176.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537AC8FC1F for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 04:21:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ru; s=mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=FiWyKvLYmRyWS6SqRNMlPrL21RlQy7YUkPq0rvF44VM=; b=MYBrtJFGM+ilraf4a+4+BSiZ3ZHp6HhwwvpghUkK4gFrNd5zyvmK5Gq0tehW2jT3+VegDyWcz2ovjjL/ZCFygkoYjS7MR9lH1EoVzy/Q089X4t6jhHzGWShSiaDNOKA6; Received: from [217.25.27.27] (port=29105 helo=[217.25.27.27]) by smtp14.mail.ru with asmtp id 1QtB9q-0005JC-00; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:21:42 +0400 Message-ID: <4E49F053.4030101@mail.ru> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:21:39 +0500 From: rihad User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 Followup-To: To: Chris Rees Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected X-Mras: Ok Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.0.4 %%PG_USER%% not changed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 04:21:44 -0000 > OK, I've reverted the problem commit (s) [1]. I'm going to take a look > at how to do this properly -- we really do need to use the code in > bsd.port.mk for creating users rather than using pkg-install files. > > Rihad, please try csupping / portsnap and check that in > postgresql90-server has the line: > > $FreeBSD: ports/databases/postgresql90-server/Makefile,v 1.222 > 2011/08/15 14:52:31 crees Exp $ > > Then reinstall and your problem will be gone. > > Sorry for the disruption. Yup, problem is gone, thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 16 11:27:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11FA8106566B; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:27:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABA48FC1A; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A788328423; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:27:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (ip-86-49-61-235.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.61.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F6E928422; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:27:09 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E4A540C.8010503@quip.cz> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:27:08 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ale@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: mysql-server-5.5.15 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:27:14 -0000 Hi, I am trying MySQL 5.5.15 as it is the default version now, but I have a problem with default charset. I used WITH_CHARSET=utf8 WITH_XCHARSET=all WITH_COLLATION=utf8_czech_ci on all our older MySQL servers (5.0 and 5.1). These knobs are no longer available, so how can I set default charset and collation? I tried following in my.cnf [client] default-character-set = utf8 [mysqld] character-set-server = utf8 collation-server = utf8_czech_ci But it gives me mysql> SHOW VARIABLES LIKE '%collation%'; +----------------------+-----------------+ | Variable_name | Value | +----------------------+-----------------+ | collation_connection | utf8_general_ci | | collation_database | utf8_czech_ci | | collation_server | utf8_czech_ci | +----------------------+-----------------+ mysql> SHOW VARIABLES LIKE '%character%'; +--------------------------+----------------------------------+ | Variable_name | Value | +--------------------------+----------------------------------+ | character_set_client | utf8 | | character_set_connection | utf8 | | character_set_database | utf8 | | character_set_filesystem | binary | | character_set_results | utf8 | | character_set_server | utf8 | | character_set_system | utf8 | | character_sets_dir | /usr/local/share/mysql/charsets/ | +--------------------------+----------------------------------+ On an older versions (compiled with WITH_ knobs) I have: mysql> SHOW VARIABLES LIKE '%collation%'; +----------------------+---------------+ | Variable_name | Value | +----------------------+---------------+ | collation_connection | utf8_czech_ci | | collation_database | utf8_czech_ci | | collation_server | utf8_czech_ci | +----------------------+---------------+ mysql> SHOW VARIABLES LIKE '%character%'; +--------------------------+----------------------------------+ | Variable_name | Value | +--------------------------+----------------------------------+ | character_set_client | utf8 | | character_set_connection | utf8 | | character_set_database | utf8 | | character_set_filesystem | binary | | character_set_results | utf8 | | character_set_server | utf8 | | character_set_system | utf8 | | character_sets_dir | /usr/local/share/mysql/charsets/ | +--------------------------+----------------------------------+ Note the difference in collation_connection! Is there any official way to restore the old behavior, or should I locally modify the port to support WITH_ knobs? It seems related to this bug: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=34980 Thanks in advance Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 16 12:05:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB82A106566C for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:05:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D628FC22 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:05:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QtIP3-0000j6-Uw for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 05:05:53 -0700 Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 05:05:53 -0700 (PDT) From: timp To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1313496353951-4704208.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <4E4A540C.8010503@quip.cz> References: <4E4A540C.8010503@quip.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: mysql-server-5.5.15 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:05:54 -0000 > compiled with WITH_ knobs MySQL 5.5 doesn't use such knobs at compile time. It uses config file when it's starting [root@timbsd] # cat /usr/local/etc/my.cnf [mysqld] #port = 3306 #socket = /tmp/mysql.sock default-storage-engine = InnoDB character-set-server=utf8 collation-server=utf8_general_ci -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-Port-mysql-server-5-5-15-tp4704114p4704208.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 16 12:50:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A611C1065676 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:50:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from andxor.it (relay.andxor.it [195.223.2.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE6798FC17 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5256 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2011 12:50:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO alex.andxor.it) (192.168.2.30) by andxor.it with SMTP; 16 Aug 2011 12:50:17 -0000 Message-ID: <4E4A6789.7000902@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:50:17 +0200 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; it-IT; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110808 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> References: <4E4A540C.8010503@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <4E4A540C.8010503@quip.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: mysql-server-5.5.15 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:50:20 -0000 Miroslav Lachman ha scritto: > Note the difference in collation_connection! > > Is there any official way to restore the old behavior, or should I > locally modify the port to support WITH_ knobs? > > It seems related to this bug: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=34980 As you say, there is an open and verified bug report, but actually are you sure you need such connection collation? I mean, that option has a really limited usefulness. -- Alex Dupre From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 16 15:20:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8515A1065672 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:20:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward12.mail.yandex.net (forward12.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71338FC15 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (smtp12.mail.yandex.net [95.108.131.191]) by forward12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 3533FC25B42 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:20:37 +0400 (MSD) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1313508037; bh=OId2+fgOl97mSCRFeWSyh4m50QpvvJJPMA9yrouD1Ow=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Npy0J57s2scA+FgylYAPL1xS7BWqZqtgzotF/FBL3lL8oK+BRwK/zkLZJeFMmKk2Y aNWo81E7zYTwpzgHGiGuJMnvqjueZ8ullQ+zGuL5s8baZDtd7yOQLZ38MiOOfCmvyU eFUBHZ65ZswFc/J8kTIhdeT61f2zjy2mNzd9P3ok= Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 27A2E16A0181 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:20:37 +0400 (MSD) Received: from unknown (unknown [213.27.65.65]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id Kawa5ueu; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:20:36 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Message-ID: <4E4A8AB7.5080501@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:20:23 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110701 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Some concerns about our postgresql and plpython ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:20:39 -0000 Hi there. We have databases/postgresql-plpython, that is marked as broken with this message: "Does not configure without threaded Python", but this is totally wrong - it actually does. I checked the internets and found this: [1] and [2]. People are actually had problems when building it WITH threaded python (that is built with threads support by default). Rebuilding python w/o threads support do the trick actually. But if you will try to build this port with threads-aware python, you'll get this error message: """ checking whether Python is compiled with thread support... yes configure: error: threaded Python not supported on this platform """ But the funny thing that it actually builds and works fine with threaded python too :). We just need to apply this patch to postgresqlXX-server's configure: - openbsd*|freebsd*) + openbsd*) And then there is no error: """ checking whether Python is compiled with thread support... yes checking for main in -lm... yes """ So what i did - i have tested the build and runtime of 8.4, 9.0, 9.1b3. both with threads-aware python and threadless python (version 2.7.2, runtime is tested only on 9-CURRENT, but with all the three PostgreSQL versions). And all of this configurations works well. For testing i'm used sample function (pymax.sql) from PosgreSQL manual and simple script (plpython.sh), that adds/removes and runs the function: """ [mrk@smeshariki2 plpython]> cat pymax.sql CREATE FUNCTION pymax (a integer, b integer) RETURNS integer AS $$ if a > b: return a return b $$ LANGUAGE plpythonu; """ """ [mrk@smeshariki2 plpython]> cat plpython.sh #!/bin/sh createlang -U pgsql plpythonu test psql -U pgsql test -f pymax.sql psql -U pgsql test -c "select pymax(1,2)" psql -U pgsql test -c "drop function pymax(a integer, b integer)" droplang -U pgsql plpythonu test """ To build databases/postgresql-plpython with PostgreSQL 9.1b3 i've used patch from [4] by Martin Neubauer , it is also included into my patch [3]. Updated regexp also working fine with 8.4 and 9.0. plpython module for 9.0 and 9.1 was renamed to plpython2.so, but there is also plpython.so symlink in 9.0 that points to plpython2.so. 9.1 also installs some extension files, so i fixed pkg-plists accordingly. Since 9.0 PostgreSQL guys use docbook for building all the documentation, including man-pages. They ever listed all the dependencies needed on FreeBSD to make it build. See [5]. But because our postgresql-client ports didn't include needed dependencies, their build are broken. In particular: postgresql91-client is broken on FreeBSD-8.2 postgresql90-client is broken on FreeBSD-7.4 postgresql91-client is broken on FreeBSD-7.4 So i have fixed this too by adding this deps to the ports. And i'm not see another solution. We need man-pages for postgresql9x-client, and man-pages needs all that docbook stuff. To make lang/python27 build without threads under tinderbox, i was forced to fix it's plist. Please see patch [6]. Probably similar patch should be applied against other python versions. The plpython port is unmantained, so please commit this anybody. Below are build logs of various configurations. Threads-aware python: --------------------- 8.2: http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/8.2/postgresql-plpython-8.4.8_1.log 8.2: http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/8.2/postgresql-plpython-9.0.4_1.log 8.2: http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/8.2/postgresql-plpython-9.1.b3_1.log 7.4: http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/7.4/postgresql-plpython-8.4.8_1.log 7.4: http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/7.4/postgresql-client-9.0.4_1.log 7.4: http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/7.4/postgresql-plpython-9.1.b3_1.log Threadless python: ------------------ 8.2: http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/8.2/postgresql-plpython-8.4.8_1-wo-threads.log 8.2: http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/8.2/postgresql-plpython-9.0.4_1-wo-threads.log 8.2: http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/8.2/postgresql-plpython-9.1.b3_1-wo-threads.log 7.4: http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/7.4/postgresql-plpython-8.4.8_1-wo-threads.log 7.4: http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/7.4/postgresql-plpython-9.0.4_1-wo-threads.log 7.4: http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/7.4/postgresql-plpython-9.1.b3_1-wo-threads.log To sum up what is included into patch [3]: - databases/postgresql-plpython no more marked as broken, since it builds both with threaded and threaless python on all supported FreeBSD versions with three major PostgreSQL branches - added configure patch for PostgreSQL 8.4, 9.0, 9.1 to make it able to build plpython threads-aware python - merge changed regexp to make plpython built with 9.1b3 from [4] - fix plists for postgresql9x-server/pkg-plist-plpython (plpython2.so and extensions) - fix build of postgresql9x-client (docbook related deps added) - portrevisions for -client and -plpython bumped I know that 8.2 and 8.3 are still supported branches, but i'm not much interested in them, so hadn't ever tried them, but believe that the same fixes applies. Please let me know if anybody actually need them, so i'll take a look at it in my spare time. Sorry for the long letter and my engrish :) [1] http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=19472 [2] http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Threaded-python-on-FreeBSD-td1955052.html [3] http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/postgresql-plpython-unbreak.diff.txt [4] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/159319 [5] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/docguide-toolsets.html [6] http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/fix-python27-plist-without-threads.diff.txt python -c "import sys; print(int('thread' in sys.builtin_module_names))" postmaster -V | sed -n 's/.*PostgreSQL[^0-9]*\([0-9][0-9]*\)\.\([0-9][0-9]*\).*/\1\2/p' pg_config --version | sed -n 's/PostgreSQL[^0-9]*\([0-9][0-9]*\)\.\([0-9][0-9]*\).*/\1\2/p' -- Regards, Ruslan From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 16 21:56:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE13106564A for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:56:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jessefrgsmith@yahoo.ca) Received: from nm38-vm5.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm38-vm5.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [72.30.239.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8295B8FC19 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.215.141] by nm38.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Aug 2011 21:43:12 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.225] by tm12.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Aug 2011 21:43:12 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1034.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Aug 2011 21:43:12 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 328015.86406.bm@omp1034.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 94793 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2011 21:43:11 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Subject:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-ID:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=2mefcBb/1SkGup8o8hVqwdobJ0JMss0CNRIX0X72EOuVy6ro8yhxVMYIPk2b6MCYvozh/Mx4LAV2OdVd3deL1tRotINRY/PzvszKG+Ne5EshPpRlzYiyVPIp6xSkFtA8bNi8UT3CPEUii/30L7MDrg6gU5KCvwLY17JcmmLUdrw= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.ca; s=s1024; t=1313530991; bh=JEUpy4qNdQX5m6+NGqg1zazOqY4aYoJ56NcEh56G0Ow=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Subject:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-ID:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=05ub3m3++14U5VzkVrFpIyD4g0CR8KLuQi1K/UA0EEoVwpGNDV2BN9nWyK/J5fdqfLGwAgL99NIwI8XAAV7LgbY+j0VKm0jBW8LWn/MBPHbPeqhwFVvLQJa79m0hd/ch2EVXplFvN5ZdJvvHIzOlnlNIl39MXJDYyJK3g6ODacU= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: iaySZMkVM1kOaFJbSwgHu25kugriF35W7.p_vOcZdtQCCjj XxWnwCxxog3sz7o0EIwRIQzCtCai5UbRgtqh3_FpSd6wqydehlhyzLQWV2.g hgXUkQpV_JPu9vcu.ucpHN0ovuUFpZI.7cWlZITMqqMK88Y5BPLLSDYQdfCU gUClGm0WNEXAFQ7sh9lQAHPY2d9jxn2T1CzfSoBrQLjAdhKy1OR1X_IGtPJy KJYD4AiCXc1kfkGrbsgOOTUhb3DnWSXa5njtZl8GKIY0l74F2_zLtIGxhhD4 k6HioIvCv4xI86FCHZ7diKvY7_YWU_OzHivrrE2K9V9d_QkcurIr9JHdIra. faWD_tc05aijhfmTaQQpoHtofGOyrHnBQyOJ6NilQY8kitTs5TNVW1L3y4dt 9KY67R4BrdrkrHac5VLIFycjWF1lMKPsWadz9BhC.U0WYCT9exWV0Wl3oc7f yE5eqbZaRkXicGtKJ2vq2HekVgRmK6K7aw0n4n_PjAJHGIZWEf_sF.7Fuvd8 jGAIptwMNi.WatHZNKVu_UjgoB_oMpV9Nye8- X-Yahoo-SMTP: NPm1JouswBClX_uJxHJINmnKUpROdMKvLL0- Received: from [192.168.0.103] (jessefrgsmith@24.137.101.37 with plain) by smtp145.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Aug 2011 14:43:11 -0700 PDT From: Jesse Smith To: freebsd-ports In-Reply-To: <4E4623DD.3070401@yandex.ru> References: <1313196256.2483.33.camel@hp-laptop> <4E4623DD.3070401@yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:42:53 -0300 Message-ID: <1313530973.3641.42.camel@hp-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Update to Ubuntu One client port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:56:28 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov To: Jesse Smith Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Update to Ubuntu One client port Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 11:12:29 +0400 Jesse Smith wrote on 13.08.2011 04:44: > Here is my third attempt at a port for the Ubuntu One client. I know > it's not pretty yet. I appreciate the feedback and I'll try to clean it > up once the port builds& installs properly. > > Has anyone had any luck getting this port to install and run, besides > me? > > Thanks everyone, > Jesse Hi, check this one. I fixed some stuff, that was pointed earlier in the list, and that is pointed by portlint, but it needs further testing. Also there is message in configure output that you should investigate: checking for icontool-render... false configure: WARNING: icontool is required to generate icons checking for pycentral... no http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/ubuntuone-client.shar.txt Ruslan, Thank you for cleaning up the Makefile (and my mess). This builds and installs nicely. I've since found Ubuntu One has some run-time dependencies I need to clear up, but this gives me a good head start. Jesse From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 17 11:18:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B39106566C for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:18:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4D88FC15 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:18:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iye7 with SMTP id 7so3132268iye.17 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 04:18:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NO3BUPkMbTTVc5VUFl82+Gx75MCMKzKw4ei9FqoxPX0=; b=sLbgMCxy8ZTrElsCSt19eHA2LyaG0u9NlhVoBrikXByvdd4sxgmdVZ08cOoXGFSgCJ Hlfb5pKwLxRrmfda+yxXmtf3RGJ7U/hOftqbu0a0fg6MSsbajZUwkLPodaqZ02sVLHg3 cwTsi9FUnHJIHzcKYvjzVeSg5GiBuaHJSwRfQ= Received: by 10.231.2.13 with SMTP id 13mr1917689ibh.59.1313579915069; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 04:18:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.182.77 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 04:18:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Rees Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:18:05 +0100 Message-ID: To: ports@freebsd.org, Poul-Henning Kamp , ben@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: sysutils/diskcheckd needs fixing and a maintainer X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:18:36 -0000 Hi all, I'm trying to clear some PRs from freebsd-ports-bugs, and I've found that sysutils/diskcheckd is in need of some attention. It doesn't appear to have been developed (or maintained) since 2001, and has a PR associated with it that looks a little tricky (koitsu@ has attempted to investigate a similar of these a while ago). I've set it DEPRECATED to expire in two months, after which I'm going to remove it if it's not fixed... Chris --- PRs --- http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/143566 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/115853 --- cvsweb --- http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/diskcheckd/ --=20 Chris Rees =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| FreeBSD Developer crees@FreeBSD.org =A0 | http://people.freebsd.org/~crees From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 17 13:44:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3452E106564A for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:44:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from troy@twisted.net) Received: from oz.twisted.net (oz.twisted.net [69.211.34.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1D98FC14 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oz.twisted.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oz.twisted.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72AFD101E34C for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:25:07 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Received: from oz.twisted.net ([127.0.0.1]) by oz.twisted.net (oz.twisted.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vwLdGsCmWNEG for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:24:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [172.16.0.5] (sindrome.twisted.net [172.16.0.5]) by oz.twisted.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CED3101DEBA for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:24:57 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4E4BC0A4.2040507@twisted.net> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:22:44 -0500 From: Troy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110808 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: net-snmp startup errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: troy@twisted.net List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:44:08 -0000 I recently updated the net-snmp port and now when I start it up I get the following error. I'm not even using sendmail, the system is using postfix. Anyone know how/where to fix this? Starting snmpd. mibII/mta_sendmail.c:open_sendmailst: could not guess version of statistics file "/var/log/sendmail.st" Error 2 (No such file or directory) could not get the assoclist From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 17 14:54:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D5A106566C; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:54:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1E88FC08; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBE0F5.dip.t-dialin.net [93.203.224.245]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p7HEaJfV003801; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:36:20 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p7HEafxw024604; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:36:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7HEaNYQ071778; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:36:29 GMT (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201108171436.p7HEaNYQ071778@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Chris Rees From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:18:05 BST." Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:36:23 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org, ben@freebsd.org, Poul-Henning Kamp Subject: Re: sysutils/diskcheckd needs fixing and a maintainer X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:54:35 -0000 Hi, Reference: > From: Chris Rees > Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:18:05 +0100 > Message-id: Chris Rees wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to clear some PRs from freebsd-ports-bugs, and I've found > that sysutils/diskcheckd is in need of some attention. > > It doesn't appear to have been developed (or maintained) since 2001, > and has a PR associated with it that looks a little tricky (koitsu@ > has attempted to investigate a similar of these a while ago). > > I've set it DEPRECATED to expire in two months, after which I'm going > to remove it if it's not fixed... I browsed the 2 URLs. It seems extreme to remove a port, just to close those send-prs. Better to leave the port marked as having some run errors in some circumstances, that we dont have manpower for, but leave port in tree. Many are not accustomed to look in Attic. If its still in tree others may find it, & port any newer version. At least it compiles. If removed, some people who look for such a tool might not know it exists & already ported. Fixing a tool that has already been easily found & built, is easier than finding, porting & fixing. Those who have been helped by a pre-existant ports/ Makefile are more likely to contribute a replacement upgrade. Those that have to do their own finding & porting are less likely to contribute their upgrade. If you'r trying to force find/ blackmail ;-) a MAINTAINER, you could also ask: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org + those who filed the 2 x send-pr Jeremy Chadwick Vincent Poy I guess you already notified creator David W. Chapman Jr. (dwcjr@FreeBSD.org) Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below, not above; Indent with "> "; Cumulative like a play script. Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 17 15:47:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC3F106564A for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:47:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B5348FC16 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:47:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxj20 with SMTP id 20so536307yxj.13 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:47:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MjbD3OVH4bjBwt9qYc+X789y0oQJDjUgZran0FQuFiA=; b=flvDoq70fQ6chD+kmpJEvni6tj+6uxKVHfqFlLYKFSiCIpaDDsZCzWQSg4xQ7RDE3Y 1PoNZRctQkbsuRvtFLvB49lo8ZWDGcXe3RevAhDnk4HXE4yLREjF+8UHBLl/RiuXRVvD z87Q2R6db1xGdMb8JbtJgzsIN5lO5Msd+S2pU= Received: by 10.43.53.73 with SMTP id vp9mr993593icb.415.1313596025077; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:47:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.182.77 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:46:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201108171436.p7HEaNYQ071778@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <201108171436.p7HEaNYQ071778@fire.js.berklix.net> From: Chris Rees Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:46:35 +0100 Message-ID: To: "Julian H. Stacey" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ports@freebsd.org, vincepoy@gmail.com Subject: Re: sysutils/diskcheckd needs fixing and a maintainer X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:47:07 -0000 On 17 August 2011 15:36, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi, > Reference: >> From: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Chris Rees >> Date: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:18:05 +0100 >> Message-id: =A0 > > Chris Rees wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm trying to clear some PRs from freebsd-ports-bugs, and I've found >> that sysutils/diskcheckd is in need of some attention. >> >> It doesn't appear to have been developed (or maintained) since 2001, >> and has a PR associated with it that looks a little tricky (koitsu@ >> has attempted to investigate a similar of these a while ago). >> >> I've set it DEPRECATED to expire in two months, after which I'm going >> to remove it if it's not fixed... > > I browsed the 2 URLs. > It seems extreme to remove a port, just to close those send-prs. > Better to leave the port marked as having some run errors in some > circumstances, that we dont have manpower for, but leave port in > tree. We don't want to provide broken software. > Many are not accustomed to look in Attic. =A0If its still in tree > others may find it, & port any newer version. The only sources for the port are in the tree-- upstream is whoever picks it up to maintain. > At least it compiles. =A0If removed, some people who look for such a > tool might not know it exists & already ported. Fixing a tool that > has already been easily found & built, is easier than > finding, porting & fixing. No, see above. We don't provide broken software. > Those who have been helped by a pre-existant ports/ Makefile are > more likely to contribute a replacement upgrade. =A0Those that have > to do their own finding & porting are less likely to contribute > their upgrade. Not sure what you're talking about here. > If you'r trying to force find/ blackmail ;-) a MAINTAINER, you could also= ask: > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0freebsd-fs@freebsd.org > + those who filed the 2 x send-pr > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Jeremy Chadwick Doubt it -- he left us a while ago. > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Vincent Poy The PR he sent was left 18 months with no reply -- since he hasn't provided a patch I don't want to bug him for one. I have updated the PR however which he will receive notice of. > I guess you already notified creator > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0David W. Chapman Jr. (dwcjr@FreeBSD.org) dwcjr moved the program from src to ports, he's not the creator. I copied ben and phk in because they were involved in the original -- I certainly don't want to bother the guy who wanted to remove it in the first place. I'm not trying to force find / blackmail anyone, I'm saying 'This software is broken, if you want FreeBSD to continue to support/provide it someone needs to fix it.' Chris --=20 Chris Rees =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| FreeBSD Developer crees@FreeBSD.org =A0 | http://people.freebsd.org/~crees From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 17 16:15:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406061065673 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:15:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212308FC1F for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 9E58C5607A; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:15:54 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:15:54 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: "Julian H. Stacey" Message-ID: <20110817161554.GA2496@lonesome.com> References: <201108171436.p7HEaNYQ071778@fire.js.berklix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201108171436.p7HEaNYQ071778@fire.js.berklix.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, ben@freebsd.org, Poul-Henning Kamp , Chris Rees Subject: Re: sysutils/diskcheckd needs fixing and a maintainer X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:15:56 -0000 On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 04:36:23PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Better to leave the port marked as having some run errors in some > circumstances, that we dont have manpower for, but leave port in > tree. Then we have the situation of a user spends the time to install it only to figure out it's obsolete, broken, junk. This is not desirable. > At least it compiles. If removed, some people who look for such a > tool might not know it exists & is already ported. But doesn't work. As for contacting: > Jeremy Chadwick no longer involved with the project (since 2008). > David W. Chapman Jr. (dwcjr@FreeBSD.org) no longer involved with the project (since 2001). While FreeBSD can't make the statement "all ports in our Ports Collection are useful and secure", we can at least make the attempt to weed out obviously obsolete and/or broken and/or abandoned ports, so that prospective users of them don't waste their time. That's what this whole deprecation and cleanup work is for: to get rid of the bitrot. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 17 16:20:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9713D106566C for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:20:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F618FC12 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id B508D5615B; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:20:45 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:20:45 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: "Julian H. Stacey" Message-ID: <20110817162045.GB2496@lonesome.com> References: <201108171436.p7HEaNYQ071778@fire.js.berklix.net> <20110817161554.GA2496@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110817161554.GA2496@lonesome.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, ben@freebsd.org, Poul-Henning Kamp , Chris Rees Subject: Re: sysutils/diskcheckd needs fixing and a maintainer X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:20:46 -0000 On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:15:54AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > > Jeremy Chadwick > > no longer involved with the project (since 2008). Actually this statement is false. He's involved with project, but not as a committer since 2008. My apologies. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 17 16:56:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11922106566B for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:56:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward12.mail.yandex.net (forward12.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88ABA8FC15 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (smtp12.mail.yandex.net [95.108.131.191]) by forward12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id DAD49C2647F for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:56:35 +0400 (MSD) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1313600195; bh=LtRMMc7fzRwJI/QfQGoh85BjaJrOwcae0TUh0Tgw/7k=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=FEKGpTbwFjiI0790OCcAnokNdajgjc4NYvUbCJ7TKjCpv2mLg4FxzVr5adADPPRwx aU33+JGZ1djB2I9anKqHK0gkxmt+drXQHQ17Lk0TwZaVYXXvhq8r45xn+kRpMqr8U6 GO1s57eWWsaPdLqlMRBBkiLMiuRiWJMEMImAnTsI= Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id CE60B16A03AE for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:56:35 +0400 (MSD) Received: from unknown (unknown [178.76.212.172]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id uZwCwTHZ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:56:35 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Message-ID: <4E4BF2B5.2020107@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:56:21 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List References: <4E4BF152.3060504@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <4E4BF152.3060504@yandex.ru> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <4E4BF152.3060504@yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Fwd: Re: Some concerns about our postgresql and plpython ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:56:38 -0000 I'm sorry, Mark, but your mailserver still dislikes me, so i can't reply to to you directly: """ : host mail.soaustin.net[66.135.54.68] said: 553 5.7.1 : Sender address rejected: Refused yandex.ru: Blocked due to mail abuse: go away spamming scum (in reply to RCPT TO command) """ -------- ИÑходное Ñообщение -------- Тема: Re: Some concerns about our postgresql and plpython ports Дата: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:50:26 +0400 От: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov Кому: Mark Linimon Mark Linimon wrote on 17.08.2011 20:26: > have you emailed the individual port maintainers? No. plpython is unmantained, postgresql ports are belongs to girgen@, that (by looking at commit's history) is not there, since all the recent changes was committed with "maintainer timeout" message. > > fwiw, I usually recommend send-pr for large fixes (OTOH dividing it up > with one PR for postgresql and one for plpython would make life a little > easier for us.) > > mcl Ok, i'll do right now. But you should take into account that plpython can't be fixed without touching postgresqlXX-server ports. I can split this up to python pkg-plist fix, postgresql9x-client build fix, and the very plpython unbreak. -- Regards, Ruslan From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 17 17:24:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DAE106566C for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:24:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB238FC16 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:24:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iye7 with SMTP id 7so3928843iye.17 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 10:24:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+ic8n/dLUtkB1y5FbfDCvbgsNl2LPP9IyzdJYPBFJs4=; b=U3JWLZmPCXFh33ZU7qvnfF0o+cjIq8WZydUVSHIFoMCHvXZIlo99nhFyEhb+eDd0yh IOl8CwcVPwZ2NtWIG6knRd1LCubQx07Na4yxCj1RHiUUzo///m0ZiiO97zYlJcalvLMA UTcmgcHYdWJA1Z9fQqyVb98JnzwYbATjcefdE= Received: by 10.231.4.99 with SMTP id 35mr2564371ibq.85.1313601863085; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 10:24:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.182.77 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 10:23:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E4BF2B5.2020107@yandex.ru> References: <4E4BF152.3060504@yandex.ru> <4E4BF2B5.2020107@yandex.ru> From: Chris Rees Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:23:53 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WaW9MTnOH4eV4FtkoMjsMJ04F2Y Message-ID: To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov , Mark Linimon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List Subject: Re: Re: Some concerns about our postgresql and plpython ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:24:24 -0000 On 17 August 2011 17:56, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > I'm sorry, Mark, but your mailserver still dislikes me, so i can't reply = to > to you directly: > > """ > : host mail.soaustin.net[66.135.54.68] said: 553 5.= 7.1 > : Sender address rejected: Refused yandex.ru: Blocked = due > to mail abuse: go away spamming scum (in reply to RCPT TO command) > """ > > -------- =E9=D3=C8=CF=C4=CE=CF=C5 =D3=CF=CF=C2=DD=C5=CE=C9=C5 -------- > =F4=C5=CD=C1: Re: Some concerns about our postgresql and plpython ports > =E4=C1=D4=C1: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:50:26 +0400 > =EF=D4: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov > =EB=CF=CD=D5: Mark Linimon > > Mark Linimon wrote on 17.08.2011 20:26: >> >> have you emailed the individual port maintainers? > > No. plpython is unmantained, postgresql ports are belongs to girgen@, > that (by looking at commit's history) is not there, since all the recent > changes was committed with "maintainer timeout" message. >> >> fwiw, I usually recommend send-pr for large fixes (OTOH dividing it up >> with one PR for postgresql and one for plpython would make life a little >> easier for us.) >> >> mcl > > Ok, i'll do right now. But you should take into account that plpython > can't be fixed without touching postgresqlXX-server ports. I can split > this up to python pkg-plist fix, postgresql9x-client build fix, and the > very plpython unbreak. Careful; those timeout commits were only mine from the USERS change (unfortunately I had to revert them too... I wouldn't go so far as to say he's inactive-- in fact I had spoken to him recently IIRC. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 17 17:27:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B12351065670; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:27:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward18.mail.yandex.net (forward18.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1402::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3320E8FC17; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp18.mail.yandex.net (smtp18.mail.yandex.net [95.108.252.18]) by forward18.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 08E8E1782C02; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:27:42 +0400 (MSD) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1313602062; bh=53UUKlLFW0OfFs/8b4OibN4sAqOJ4TxqZgvpvtV6gZE=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=RelL/+4/70RgkiYRgEscYaCcBySKKtmn6Pwr/+T+0E9D7J8pCenOgtnRqpK0E/fqZ FSxwjMuKUDkaKIHCl+Qw+VEybgCXFMbd53HbrbgWb7t00/uHODNlbWMzY8chtyqMiR Wgmv0WR8Pu+07qifIp5PbRreJ3izeTFRw7i+sZw0= Received: from smtp18.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp18.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id DD7CD18A0340; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:27:41 +0400 (MSD) Received: from unknown (unknown [178.76.212.172]) by smtp18.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id RfWeRS4x; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:27:41 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Message-ID: <4E4BF9FF.4080706@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:27:27 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4E4BF152.3060504@yandex.ru> <4E4BF2B5.2020107@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , Mark Linimon Subject: Re: Some concerns about our postgresql and plpython ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:27:48 -0000 Chris Rees wrote on 17.08.2011 21:23: > On 17 August 2011 17:56, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: >> I'm sorry, Mark, but your mailserver still dislikes me, so i can't reply to >> to you directly: >> >> """ >> : host mail.soaustin.net[66.135.54.68] said: 553 5.7.1 >> : Sender address rejected: Refused yandex.ru: Blocked due >> to mail abuse: go away spamming scum (in reply to RCPT TO command) >> """ >> >> -------- ИÑходное Ñообщение -------- >> Тема: Re: Some concerns about our postgresql and plpython ports >> Дата: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:50:26 +0400 >> От: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov >> Кому: Mark Linimon >> >> Mark Linimon wrote on 17.08.2011 20:26: >>> >>> have you emailed the individual port maintainers? >> >> No. plpython is unmantained, postgresql ports are belongs to girgen@, >> that (by looking at commit's history) is not there, since all the recent >> changes was committed with "maintainer timeout" message. >>> >>> fwiw, I usually recommend send-pr for large fixes (OTOH dividing it up >>> with one PR for postgresql and one for plpython would make life a little >>> easier for us.) >>> >>> mcl >> >> Ok, i'll do right now. But you should take into account that plpython >> can't be fixed without touching postgresqlXX-server ports. I can split >> this up to python pkg-plist fix, postgresql9x-client build fix, and the >> very plpython unbreak. > > Careful; those timeout commits were only mine from the USERS change > (unfortunately I had to revert them too... I wouldn't go so far as to > say he's inactive-- in fact I had spoken to him recently IIRC. > > Chris Ok, this is mean i was wrong. -- Regards, Ruslan From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 17 17:54:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7062B106564A; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:54:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward19.mail.yandex.net (forward19.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1402::4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386018FC08; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:54:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp18.mail.yandex.net (smtp18.mail.yandex.net [95.108.252.18]) by forward19.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 5AC621123203; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:54:30 +0400 (MSD) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1313603670; bh=gK3v2lb/bbp7cK/WeD+U+ovvLtgReDjehU9B978Iiio=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=AHs7D807Je1lHVv17L8Cb7+fdzaxab2JiahYQPoR7o8xYQ4TqS8NIjtmox9hGkE+7 hx9Unknz7qoJlDNlAQd6N3+Hzgmp8A+bCT4i+RcWEY5DE3kjY3ScQUa7x2xbXtI3je nJG4+QnrDg6nG2OTChUNIye9XhKQvQljIAWnlS4U= Received: from smtp18.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp18.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 35C7B18A0340; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:54:30 +0400 (MSD) Received: from unknown (unknown [178.76.212.172]) by smtp18.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id sTWed2Mi; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:54:30 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Message-ID: <4E4C0048.5090509@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:54:16 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List References: <4E4A8AB7.5080501@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <4E4A8AB7.5080501@yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chris Rees , Palle Girgensohn Subject: Re: Some concerns about our postgresql and plpython ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:54:33 -0000 So i split this up to three pr's as was suggested by Mark: 1. Python pkg-plist fix for WITHOUT_THREADS case: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=159842 2. postgresql-plpython unbreak: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=159843 3. postgresql9x-client unbreak: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=159844 Palle (maintainer of postgresql ports) cc'ed. Thanks in advance for handling this. PS. I just found that the similar plist fix was submitted for python26 a year ago: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/148406 Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote on 16.08.2011 19:20: > Hi there. > > We have databases/postgresql-plpython, that is marked as broken with > this message: "Does not configure without threaded Python", but this is > totally wrong - it actually does. I checked the internets and found > this: [1] and [2]. People are actually had problems when building it > WITH threaded python (that is built with threads support by default). > Rebuilding python w/o threads support do the trick actually. But if you > will try to build this port with threads-aware python, you'll get this > error message: > > """ > checking whether Python is compiled with thread support... yes > configure: error: threaded Python not supported on this platform > """ > > But the funny thing that it actually builds and works fine with threaded > python too :). We just need to apply this patch to postgresqlXX-server's > configure: > > - openbsd*|freebsd*) > + openbsd*) > > And then there is no error: > > """ > checking whether Python is compiled with thread support... yes > checking for main in -lm... yes > """ > > So what i did - i have tested the build and runtime of 8.4, 9.0, 9.1b3. > both with threads-aware python and threadless python (version 2.7.2, > runtime is tested only on 9-CURRENT, but with all the three PostgreSQL > versions). > And all of this configurations works well. For testing i'm used sample > function (pymax.sql) from PosgreSQL manual and simple script > (plpython.sh), that adds/removes and runs the function: > > """ > [mrk@smeshariki2 plpython]> cat pymax.sql > CREATE FUNCTION pymax (a integer, b integer) > RETURNS integer > AS $$ > if a > b: > return a > return b > $$ LANGUAGE plpythonu; > """ > > """ > [mrk@smeshariki2 plpython]> cat plpython.sh > #!/bin/sh > > createlang -U pgsql plpythonu test > psql -U pgsql test -f pymax.sql > psql -U pgsql test -c "select pymax(1,2)" > psql -U pgsql test -c "drop function pymax(a integer, b integer)" > droplang -U pgsql plpythonu test > """ > > To build databases/postgresql-plpython with PostgreSQL 9.1b3 i've used > patch from [4] by Martin Neubauer , > it is also included into my patch [3]. Updated regexp also working > fine with 8.4 and 9.0. > > plpython module for 9.0 and 9.1 was renamed to plpython2.so, but there > is also plpython.so symlink in 9.0 that points to plpython2.so. 9.1 also > installs some extension files, so i fixed pkg-plists accordingly. > > Since 9.0 PostgreSQL guys use docbook for building all the > documentation, including man-pages. They ever listed all the > dependencies needed on FreeBSD to make it build. See [5]. But because > our postgresql-client ports didn't include needed dependencies, their > build are broken. In particular: > > postgresql91-client is broken on FreeBSD-8.2 > postgresql90-client is broken on FreeBSD-7.4 > postgresql91-client is broken on FreeBSD-7.4 > > So i have fixed this too by adding this deps to the ports. And i'm not > see another solution. We need man-pages for postgresql9x-client, and > man-pages needs all that docbook stuff. > > To make lang/python27 build without threads under tinderbox, i was > forced to fix it's plist. Please see patch [6]. Probably similar patch > should be applied against other python versions. > > The plpython port is unmantained, so please commit this anybody. > Below are build logs of various configurations. > > Threads-aware python: > --------------------- > 8.2: http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/8.2/postgresql-plpython-8.4.8_1.log > 8.2: http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/8.2/postgresql-plpython-9.0.4_1.log > 8.2: > http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/8.2/postgresql-plpython-9.1.b3_1.log > 7.4: http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/7.4/postgresql-plpython-8.4.8_1.log > 7.4: http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/7.4/postgresql-client-9.0.4_1.log > 7.4: > http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/7.4/postgresql-plpython-9.1.b3_1.log > > Threadless python: > ------------------ > 8.2: > http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/8.2/postgresql-plpython-8.4.8_1-wo-threads.log > > 8.2: > http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/8.2/postgresql-plpython-9.0.4_1-wo-threads.log > > 8.2: > http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/8.2/postgresql-plpython-9.1.b3_1-wo-threads.log > > 7.4: > http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/7.4/postgresql-plpython-8.4.8_1-wo-threads.log > > 7.4: > http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/7.4/postgresql-plpython-9.0.4_1-wo-threads.log > > 7.4: > http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/tb/7.4/postgresql-plpython-9.1.b3_1-wo-threads.log > > > To sum up what is included into patch [3]: > - databases/postgresql-plpython no more marked as broken, since it > builds both with threaded and threaless python on all supported > FreeBSD versions with three major PostgreSQL branches > - added configure patch for PostgreSQL 8.4, 9.0, 9.1 to make it able to > build plpython threads-aware python > - merge changed regexp to make plpython built with 9.1b3 from [4] > - fix plists for postgresql9x-server/pkg-plist-plpython (plpython2.so > and extensions) > - fix build of postgresql9x-client (docbook related deps added) > - portrevisions for -client and -plpython bumped > > I know that 8.2 and 8.3 are still supported branches, but i'm not much > interested in them, so hadn't ever tried them, but believe that the same > fixes applies. > Please let me know if anybody actually need them, so i'll take a look > at it in my spare time. > > Sorry for the long letter and my engrish :) > > [1] http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=19472 > [2] > http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Threaded-python-on-FreeBSD-td1955052.html > > [3] http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/postgresql-plpython-unbreak.diff.txt > [4] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/159319 > [5] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/docguide-toolsets.html > [6] > http://happy-nation.by.ru/ports/fix-python27-plist-without-threads.diff.txt > > > > > > > python -c "import sys; print(int('thread' in sys.builtin_module_names))" > postmaster -V | sed -n > 's/.*PostgreSQL[^0-9]*\([0-9][0-9]*\)\.\([0-9][0-9]*\).*/\1\2/p' > pg_config --version | sed -n > 's/PostgreSQL[^0-9]*\([0-9][0-9]*\)\.\([0-9][0-9]*\).*/\1\2/p' > -- Regards, Ruslan From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 17 21:16:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23431065670 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:16:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frankmwuest@yahoo.de) Received: from nm1-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com (nm1-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com [77.238.189.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDD568FC1E for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:16:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [77.238.189.231] by nm1.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Aug 2011 21:03:02 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.245] by tm12.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Aug 2011 21:03:02 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1010.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Aug 2011 21:03:02 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 125566.94316.bm@omp1010.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 17413 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Aug 2011 21:03:02 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.de; s=s1024; t=1313614981; bh=qrWr7Ka6NBvPCNd/D6j3+tVUeU7hF6TFYZxcAfYiN1Q=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=bAcvnMjrxUyhLSgY6KYVthf1Z7cndyMR1jQRxS+7sFPMXQ3oJi1hcKqMV3CKk6AF6IfjNmZK5XXbX0uhAmAVAF9OB0IDjSEC942Lryu4ms8NtfR5xl8AG29aYzJU4RWfXYui0S5dkkYNcWtJTwjvq0X5f9G3XAyHwRDwkqgH6uY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.de; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=b5BnbCA2li14HfYgATxuhGpNDC/hFpmKW66BeyWac1u4/VdjEKM+wja8Djyz/YHdUamFD8aVb/4Kgp1R9af4bCzXxlDYFdxeHVoG+gLgGmbRKDj4A+e4Hcs4cb1fFpFJReK1/VkDqwv+Nz5ckGmY1M/njgzLkGEcpWjiU6UnDk4=; X-YMail-OSG: uhCREeoVM1kaIVNvv1gqUbHKW3MugFi5ieyZVLVEh0jgXEG xqB2l4DPHYvW2vMXkVYzOsmZFtsnMuSUg83jzztK9ljwlHQf2pa5slJi133N gAKOBVH7nQmvJ_lm7HhhLKIGYIH8KBjYu6tOb7GPvamKN5YTp9d8R3rC220F WqpvGX26Q.JysABAVLFPAiuzPCBSYvu4KMzPUiLl6k115rb4MrohRsWHZVPX 1MJP3.CZQuxPhNf1g_lFQSAh2QB4Rpe4xoK6_BnDme9q01YiKgG7Ohmq7MLL md8paZCIwO.fKmQH3cWXe9DVcgw4bwVruziQj0RvWpshVX0Z4vyfJ_JGTQgZ .KPjMB32EGg0tymh5z5fX_KFXHHvNY2MjqKHHHUS.X6KVWAeIFUY4y.rdJV3 2sicONxZobE_Z_N7O Received: from [109.193.62.0] by web24709.mail.ird.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 22:03:01 BST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/14.0.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.113.313619 Message-ID: <1313614981.86294.YahooMailClassic@web24709.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 22:03:01 +0100 (BST) From: Frank Wuest To: ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: mencoder / p5-Unicode-Map8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:16:20 -0000 Hi everyone, I just tried to build mencoder from ports (ports tree is up to date). I had to remove libass subtitle support from the configuration because p5-Unicode-Map8 failed to build: cp Map8/maps/IBM278.bin blib/lib/Unicode/Map8/maps/IBM278.bin /usr/local/bin/perl5.10.1 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.1/ExtUtils/xs= ubpp -typemap /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.10.1/ExtUtils/typemap -typemap typema= p Map8.xs > Map8.xsc && mv Map8.xsc Map8.c Could not find a typemap for C type 'U16*' in Map8.xs, line 229 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/converters/p5-Unicode-Map8/work/Unicode-Map8-0.13. *** Error code 1 Regards, Frank From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 17 23:28:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FFD1065679 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:28:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271D78FC12 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:28:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBF3D6.dip.t-dialin.net [217.251.243.214]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p7HNSm49006815; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:28:50 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p7HNRC7j099038; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 01:27:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7HNR16x069258; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:27:07 GMT (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201108172327.p7HNR16x069258@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Chris Rees From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:46:35 BST." Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 01:27:01 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org, vincepoy@gmail.com Subject: Re: sysutils/diskcheckd needs fixing and a maintainer X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:28:52 -0000 .... > software is broken, if you want FreeBSD to continue to support/provide > it someone needs to fix it.' Thanks for the reply Chris. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below, not above; Indent with "> "; Cumulative like a play script. Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 18 00:59:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2B7106564A; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:59:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320238FC12; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:59:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBE79E.dip.t-dialin.net [93.203.231.158]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p7I0xMAO007328; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:59:23 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p7I0xBWJ001897; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 02:59:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7I0vH1B070035; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:57:33 GMT (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201108180057.p7I0vH1B070035@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Mark Linimon From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:15:54 CDT." <20110817161554.GA2496@lonesome.com> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 02:57:17 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org, ben@freebsd.org, Poul-Henning Kamp , Chris Rees Subject: Re: sysutils/diskcheckd needs fixing and a maintainer X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:59:25 -0000 Hi Mark, > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 04:36:23PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Better to leave the port marked as having some run errors in some > > circumstances, that we dont have manpower for, but leave port in > > tree. > > Then we have the situation of a user spends the time to install it only > to figure out it's obsolete, broken, junk. This is not desirable. > > > At least it compiles. If removed, some people who look for such a > > tool might not know it exists & is already ported. > > But doesn't work. As for contacting: > > > Jeremy Chadwick > > no longer involved with the project (since 2008). > > > David W. Chapman Jr. (dwcjr@FreeBSD.org) > > no longer involved with the project (since 2001). > > While FreeBSD can't make the statement "all ports in our Ports Collection > are useful and secure", we can at least make the attempt to weed out > obviously obsolete and/or broken and/or abandoned ports, so that prospective > users of them don't waste their time. > That's what this whole deprecation and cleanup work is for: to get rid of > the bitrot. I can live with whatever Chris, you & ports team decide on this port, But .. I'd question _why_ valuable people like you & Chris would allow your time to be distracted merely to try to get repair run time capability of a port. Run time performance should be beyond priority remit of central ports team, There's more important work for their rare skills. As Vadim Goncharov just wrote to arch@ Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:10:19 +0000 (UTC) on another thread: "we often have not enough \n time/resources" Only a limited number of people are skilled in ports/ variables & arcane macros etc, many shy away. A great deal more normal *Unix* generic people are perfectly capable of fixing many normal post build problems, eg the run time problems of this port. Ports team members with rare understanding of arcane ports make variables & macros, should be concentrating on that, to enhance the general automatic build capability, so less ports fight with each other & break at build time. Colliding & breaking ports has been The most serious problem of ports for years. far more serious than bit rot in odd old obscure ports, eg run time errors. So, after repeating I can live with whatever Chris, you & ports team decide on this port, I'd suggest ports team spend minimal time on this port & other similar bit rot ports. Don't try to fix run time performance/errors. Don't lose time on merit or de-merit of deleting a port that builds, to allow 2 send-pr to be deleted. Instead invent & apply new variable[s] eg INSTALL_OR_RUN_DEPRECATED="summary of 2 send-prs" aka eg RUN_DEPENDS BUILD_DEPENDS etc Consider that sufficient to allow a closure of send-pr after copying send-prs to a README dir in the port. Leave it & other easy ports runtime problems for less [ports]skilled users to fix. & conserve your valuable time for the hard stuff, eg More compatability automation between competing ports. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below, not above; Indent with "> "; Cumulative like a play script. Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 18 01:14:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0D81065673; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 01:14:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC2E8FC0A; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 01:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p7I1DuPM042347 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:13:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p7I1DuBN042346; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:13:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA08405; Wed, 17 Aug 11 18:03:47 PDT Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 01:03:28 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: utisoft@gmail.com, linimon@lonesome.com Message-Id: <4e4cc750.GqJImeHzdv6k8zld%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <201108171436.p7HEaNYQ071778@fire.js.berklix.net> <20110817161554.GA2496@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20110817161554.GA2496@lonesome.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, ben@freebsd.org, phk@phk.freebsd.dk, jhs@berklix.com Subject: Re: sysutils/diskcheckd needs fixing and a maintainer X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 01:14:01 -0000 Chris Rees wrote: > We don't want to provide broken software. Mark Linimon wrote: > ... it's obsolete, broken, junk ... Unless there is more to this than is reported in those two PRs, I'd call it a considerable exaggeration to describe diskcheckd as "broken". * http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/115853 is shown as "closed", so presumably is no longer a problem. * http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/143566 says "... diskcheckd runs fine when gmirror is not involved ..." and then goes on to describe a problem _when diskcheckd is run on a component of a gmirror_. How anyone got from "in some way incompatible with gmirror" to "broken" escapes me. One could as well claim that gmirror is "broken" because it is incompatible with diskcheckd >:-> I'm currently running diskcheckd on an 8.1 gmirrored system with config file /dev/ad0 * * 8192 -- which should be using about 1/6 of that disk's bandwidth -- and will see what happens when it reaches the end of the disk (sometime tomorrow). So far I have not seen any issues. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 18 06:21:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD51C106564A; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 06:21:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ACA48FC0C; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 06:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywo32 with SMTP id 32so1468736ywo.13 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:21:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P2L+n1Lj8sxYT8M6JQzTTYPo9MUj/9lvBp6Gres5t50=; b=uVuS+QodRMANU+5xVL01ptD/DLsrVCJNJ95wbMBjLqxRg99xSoVoyoNKuI/wFiZ0S1 3FNMK9bS1IiwkUG8WlIj1Zb0bw6xSgYFyQwwoGZWCctZbK0Eimkls/f6r1+VR4dLEQn4 8vIDyRgYgssw+Ap1XiXebXBdxq5Qw9YWe1kZQ= Received: by 10.42.153.135 with SMTP id m7mr414530icw.348.1313648480194; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:21:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.182.77 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:20:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4e4cc750.GqJImeHzdv6k8zld%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <201108171436.p7HEaNYQ071778@fire.js.berklix.net> <20110817161554.GA2496@lonesome.com> <4e4cc750.GqJImeHzdv6k8zld%perryh@pluto.rain.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:20:50 +0100 Message-ID: To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ports@freebsd.org, linimon@lonesome.com, phk@phk.freebsd.dk, jhs@berklix.com, ben@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysutils/diskcheckd needs fixing and a maintainer X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 06:21:22 -0000 On 18 August 2011 09:03, wrote: > Chris Rees wrote: > >> We don't want to provide broken software. > > Mark Linimon wrote: > >> ... it's obsolete, broken, junk ... > > Unless there is more to this than is reported in those two PRs, > I'd call it a considerable exaggeration to describe diskcheckd > as "broken". > > * http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/115853 > =A0is shown as "closed", so presumably is no longer a problem. Wow, would it have been too difficult to actually READ the closing message from Jeremy? I suggest you look again -- I've pasted it here so you can see it. "The problem here is that the code does not do what the manpage says (or vice-versa). The 3rd column does not specify frequency of checking, but rather, over what duration of time to spread a single disk scan over. Thus, 7 days would mean "spread the entire disk check at X rate over the course of 7 days". There is still a bug in the code where large disks will cause problems resulting in updateproctitle() never getting called, and so on, but that's unrelated to this PR. I'm closing the PR because trying to fix all of this should really be ben@'s responsibility. (Sorry for sounding harsh.)" How does that indicate it's fixed? It's an 'abandoned' PR. > * http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/143566 > =A0says "... diskcheckd runs fine when gmirror is not involved ..." > =A0and then goes on to describe a problem _when diskcheckd is run > =A0on a component of a gmirror_. > > How anyone got from "in some way incompatible with gmirror" to > "broken" escapes me. =A0One could as well claim that gmirror is > "broken" because it is incompatible with diskcheckd >:-> No. It's broken because there's no logical reason -- it will probably break with other things. > I'm currently running diskcheckd on an 8.1 gmirrored system with > config file > > =A0/dev/ad0 * * 8192 > > -- which should be using about 1/6 of that disk's bandwidth -- and > will see what happens when it reaches the end of the disk (sometime > tomorrow). =A0So far I have not seen any issues. Thank you for testing and investigating, this is what the port has needed, and two days of being deprecated has achieved more than 18 months of a PR being open. Chris --=20 Chris Rees =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| FreeBSD Developer crees@FreeBSD.org =A0 | http://people.freebsd.org/~crees From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 18 07:14:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.emma.line.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7253106564A for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:14:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mandree@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A73C23CF42 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:14:55 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E4CBBEE.4040302@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:14:54 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <201108171436.p7HEaNYQ071778@fire.js.berklix.net> <20110817161554.GA2496@lonesome.com> <4e4cc750.GqJImeHzdv6k8zld%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: sysutils/diskcheckd needs fixing and a maintainer X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:14:57 -0000 Am 18.08.2011 08:20, schrieb Chris Rees: > On 18 August 2011 09:03, wrote: >> Chris Rees wrote: >> >>> We don't want to provide broken software. >> >> Mark Linimon wrote: >> >>> ... it's obsolete, broken, junk ... >> >> Unless there is more to this than is reported in those two PRs, >> I'd call it a considerable exaggeration to describe diskcheckd >> as "broken". >> >> * http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/115853 >> is shown as "closed", so presumably is no longer a problem. > > Wow, would it have been too difficult to actually READ the closing > message from Jeremy? I suggest you look again -- I've pasted it here > so you can see it. > > "The problem here is that the code does not do what the manpage says (or > vice-versa). The 3rd column does not specify frequency of checking, but > rather, over what duration of time to spread a single disk scan over. > Thus, 7 days would mean "spread the entire disk check at X rate over the > course of 7 days". There is still a bug in the code where large disks > will cause problems resulting in updateproctitle() never getting called, > and so on, but that's unrelated to this PR. I'm closing the PR because > trying to fix all of this should really be ben@'s responsibility. > (Sorry for sounding harsh.)" > > How does that indicate it's fixed? It's an 'abandoned' PR. This would be a case for marking it suspended (or possibly analyzed, depending on which of these two fits best), rather than closing it. The status is also a statement... > Thank you for testing and investigating, this is what the port has > needed, and two days of being deprecated has achieved more than 18 > months of a PR being open. So the bottom line for this case is, we sometimes only get sufficient attention through deprecating ports. Unfortunately that approach might wear off some day. Too bad. :-( Do we need a "think twice before adding a port" habit? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 18 08:51:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA254106564A for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:51:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jindrich@kana.at) Received: from relay8.web4ce.cz (relay8.web4ce.cz [93.190.48.88]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ECE28FC12 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:51:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from scorpio.web4ce.cz (scorpio.s.web4ce.cz [93.190.48.208]) by relay8.web4ce.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D3EB5E0D0 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:33:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: by scorpio.web4ce.cz (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:33:44 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmail.kana.at (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:33:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20110818103344.pn4fkqcqio4csck4@webmail.kana.at> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:33:44 +0200 From: =?utf-8?b?SmluZMWZaWNoIA==?= =?utf-8?b?S8OhxYhh?= To: ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.6) Cc: Subject: apps in ports by license X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:51:12 -0000 Dear All, Maybe stupid question.... but is there any possibility to search, sort apps by license? Thanks much!! Jindra From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 18 09:04:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FEDD106564A for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:04:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from anubis.delphij.net (anubis.delphij.net [IPv6:2001:470:1:117::25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186EA8FC14 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:04:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from delta.delphij.net (c-76-102-50-245.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.102.50.245]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by anubis.delphij.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D38F41564C; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 02:04:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=delphij.net; s=anubis; t=1313658266; bh=LZp0bxw6DKMHz93vAZ6wMhYCJ3DSYthqWoU9wnk+YfA=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=05rg1l4T70kR0Kpbrum8Pggah00T5zD2POhhMyDyb4+6qQiAk51/8VTpMqT084l1b oJHuZRxICw6tvBK3PTu1rs96Vx16y28aXo7LZvEFBIjv53EcJsW3sZ+FUtrboUcQF5 XdfhnkXDnGMgDozZe2xjFfD9O5WhdEfIYe8Z+eEQ= Message-ID: <4E4CD59A.4020801@delphij.net> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 02:04:26 -0700 From: Xin LI Organization: The FreeBSD Project MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20110818103344.pn4fkqcqio4csck4@webmail.kana.at> In-Reply-To: <20110818103344.pn4fkqcqio4csck4@webmail.kana.at> OpenPGP: id=3FCA37C1; url=http://www.delphij.net/delphij.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: apps in ports by license X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: d@delphij.net List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:04:27 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 08/18/11 01:33, JindÅ™ich Káňa wrote: > Dear All, > > Maybe stupid question.... but is there any possibility to search, > sort apps by license? Not currently. This would need a change to INDEX format I think... Cheers, - -- Xin LI https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOTNWaAAoJEATO+BI/yjfBgUQH/3t33gZKSD9G3TWfsAYQBscY HfGxsW82K9Gsn9WTpdtQh7G0fwxE0ZuH01r4IHmwneBjGCcv+n9VGep6FSag1h3+ JkFcG3xe+XxqhTc/qjRk5tdqR8miShQ6XN1cLSaWnQKH2yM4OCenrXcM9s6ieGmu iipHHeKVAyg705EbRAQXhzZUM9B8Zq2lDELJmwYIQVdNsiiG9WO6blWRpA2yNNPx JoaCS3BimjO/Zmxj6oZZ/lzD+cyRetYKJq0SuQOcMQ6F2sbfoSh/DP+vRpSS7ozy AwBLiFhDH+DfP9o22DnwKWZK4t+yZ3pgf0iRZNVpfJg+3Tw1UrFHgbSEyr58eTc= =fg/A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 18 13:01:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79F5106567B for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:01:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A697D8FC0A for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:01:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iye7 with SMTP id 7so6937191iye.17 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 06:01:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nRn/oLv2z+lyLuHHWLfjN4i8DlCeekEuhhi7PwSEQp8=; b=TcGh0hSKxeS49a2Dok93J+9NyQ5kdEY9XLjjgjMDFzOK7seElQ8XyWswpZoQ3BJwu2 QJK0PiqMDvrJbVWz30YKU901UMldEI3+FJkOm9Lw4EFcbyhnSEJTEHTBlof/CoJscLVT QD8XOxbrUsTjDF+eHY7+JXAuFd5eFk5DHgCio= Received: by 10.231.2.13 with SMTP id 13mr1578077ibh.59.1313672473050; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 06:01:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.182.77 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 06:00:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110818103344.pn4fkqcqio4csck4@webmail.kana.at> References: <20110818103344.pn4fkqcqio4csck4@webmail.kana.at> From: Chris Rees Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:00:43 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: PWeOKsevHwHWrIZF9ucfIIZw-4U Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?SmluZMWZaWNoIEvDocWIYQ==?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apps in ports by license X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:01:13 -0000 On 18 August 2011 09:33, Jind=C5=99ich K=C3=A1=C5=88a wr= ote: > Dear All, > > Maybe stupid question.... but is there any possibility to search, sort ap= ps > by license? Not a stupid question -- currently there isn't an easy way, but why would you want to do that anyway? Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 18 19:11:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5301065672 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482F18FC08 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qu805-0005tE-MJ for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:11:33 +0200 Received: from p5dcd6e6c.dip.t-dialin.net ([93.205.110.108]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:11:33 +0200 Received: from jumper99 by p5dcd6e6c.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:11:33 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Helmut Schneider" Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 13 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5dcd6e6c.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: XanaNews/1.19.1.320 X-Ref: news.gmane.org ~XNS:0000020B X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 110818-0, 18.08.2011), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: Big patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:36 -0000 Hi, I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be avoided´at most costs. Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a "SPAM Filter" or at least take 2 days until I get reply. See PR159878-81, I submitted the patches on tuesday. So, what should I do? Still create full pkg-plists and hope that the patch passes the FreeBSD PR system or fall back to dynamic pkg-plists? Thanks, Helmut From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 18 19:58:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105D21065674 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:58:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E018FC0C for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:58:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iye7 with SMTP id 7so7890426iye.17 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:58:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DMBQG/CXCx+6bB9zKFP7LSVJPaGZo57m3c7DDgdWd6w=; b=lbipNOwHrEOBh0gzfgz+UB+iS/AkzNksFH4Al8o3+rYFjpQWLQmbG8pHKJkNTRHyiP 7bFYY3OOXaBU4FoizvJmkrqmRx+AMpm2kbaAvI65pW1ikOV8fha+fWbWvlC/XwALl5sA Q134hphDlFxAhhLXLsDDAWTGeB2rYmnc+UM0Q= Received: by 10.231.2.13 with SMTP id 13mr2416724ibh.59.1313697498088; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:58:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.182.77 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:57:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Chris Rees Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:57:48 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: JN5P6-k2r1fz37Dlcq-YaGCEeVU Message-ID: To: Helmut Schneider Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Big patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:58:19 -0000 On 18 August 2011 20:11, Helmut Schneider wrote: > Hi, > > I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be > avoided=B4at most costs. > > Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a "SPAM Filter" or at > least take 2 days until I get reply. See PR159878-81, I submitted the > patches on tuesday. > > So, what should I do? Still create full pkg-plists and hope that the > patch passes the FreeBSD PR system or fall back to dynamic pkg-plists? > > Thanks, Helmut Do you have any webspace you could upload them to? If not, email them to me and I'll host them for you. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 18 21:05:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0438106566C; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:05:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.139.233.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619C98FC0C; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cde1100.uni.vrs [192.168.0.100]) (Authenticated sender: ohauer) by p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A125D20809; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:05:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E4D7E95.8070808@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:05:25 +0200 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports , apache@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: [HEADS UP] apache22 will be become the default apache version during the next days! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ohauer@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:05:29 -0000 Just a short reminder. We will switch the default apache version during the next days to from apache13 to apache22. apache13 will stay in the portstree for the next months, but will be removed before end of this year! Users who will stay for this time with apache13 should create the following entry in /etc/make.conf. APACHE_PORT= www/apache13 Please take the time and migrate to apache22 now! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 18 21:57:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520CF106566C for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:57:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hopet@ics.muni.cz) Received: from minas.ics.muni.cz (minas.ics.muni.cz [147.251.4.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98A68FC08 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:57:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kloboucek (holub.ics.muni.cz [147.251.23.83]) (authenticated user=hopet@ICS.MUNI.CZ bits=0) by minas.ics.muni.cz (8.13.8/8.13.8/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p7ILd9Wq032246 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:39:09 +0200 From: "Petr Holub" To: Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:38:58 +0200 Message-ID: <00e201cc5def$3faf1ef0$bf0d5cd0$@muni.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acxd7ztUtR16rKaqTSSJHFBN97vMTA== Content-Language: cs X-Muni-Spam-TestIP: 147.251.23.83 X-Muni-Envelope-From: hopet@ics.muni.cz X-Muni-Virus-Test: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (minas.ics.muni.cz [147.251.4.35]); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:39:09 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Subject: Postfix - Dovecot SASL problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:57:33 -0000 Hi, I'm using mail/postfix with WITH_DOVECOT2=yes and mail/dovecot2 with MySQL backend for users from FreeBSD ports: dovecot-2.0.12 postfix-2.8.4,1 I'm unable to get SMTP authentication working using Dovecot SASL with ---- postfix/main.cf: ---- ... smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous, noplaintext smtpd_sasl_tls_security_options = noanonymous ... ---- dovecot/dovecot.conf ---- ... userdb { args = /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot-mysql.conf driver = sql } passdb { args = /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot-mysql.conf driver = sql } service auth { unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth { group = postfix mode = 0660 user = postfix } } ... ---- Postfix works fine if the SASL Auth is turned off. Dovecot works fine per se for accessing mailboxes via POP3 and IMAP. When attempting to use Dovecot for SMTP SASL auth, what I get is ---- 2011-08-18 23:31:57auth: Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/auth Aug 18 23:31:57 mail postfix/smtpd[57411]: fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms 2011-08-18 23:31:57auth: Debug: auth client connected (pid=57411) Aug 18 23:31:58 mail postfix/master[57398]: warning: process /usr/local/libexec/postfix/smtpd pid 57411 exit status 1 Aug 18 23:31:58 mail postfix/master[57398]: warning: /usr/local/libexec/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling ---- even though postfix starts to talk to dovecot accroding to ktrace: ---- 57671 smtpd CALL connect(0xe,0x7fffffffd870,0x6a) 57671 smtpd STRU struct sockaddr { AF_LOCAL, private/auth } 57671 smtpd NAMI "private/auth" 57671 smtpd RET connect 0 57671 smtpd CALL fcntl(0xe,F_GETFL,0) 57671 smtpd RET fcntl 6 57671 smtpd CALL fcntl(0xe,F_SETFL,O_RDWR) 57671 smtpd RET fcntl 0 57671 smtpd CALL gettimeofday(0x801434770,0) 57671 smtpd RET gettimeofday 0 57671 smtpd CALL getpid 57671 smtpd RET getpid 57671/0xe147 57671 smtpd CALL poll(0x7fffffffd860,0x1,0x2710) 57671 smtpd RET poll 1 57671 smtpd CALL write(0xe,0x80144f010,0x17) 57671 smtpd GIO fd 14 wrote 23 bytes "VERSION 1 0 CPID 57671 " 57671 smtpd RET write 23/0x17 57671 smtpd CALL gettimeofday(0x801434770,0) 57671 smtpd RET gettimeofday 0 57671 smtpd CALL poll(0x7fffffffd850,0x1,0x2710) 57671 smtpd RET poll 1 57671 smtpd CALL read(0xe,0x80144f010,0x1000) 57671 smtpd GIO fd 14 read 117 bytes "VERSION 1 1 MECH PLAIN plaintext MECH LOGIN plaintext SPID 57672 CUID 1 COOKIE acc0b5dcc32aed19ae3e6823ad91bc42 DONE " 57671 smtpd RET read 117/0x75 57671 smtpd CALL gettimeofday(0x801434770,0) 57671 smtpd RET gettimeofday 0 57671 smtpd CALL gettimeofday(0x7fffffffca80,0) 57671 smtpd RET gettimeofday 0 57671 smtpd CALL getpid 57671 smtpd RET getpid 57671/0xe147 57671 smtpd CALL sendto(0x7,0x7fffffffcac0,0x52,0,0,0) 57671 smtpd GIO fd 7 wrote 82 bytes "<18>Aug 18 23:33:35 postfix/smtpd[57671]: fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms" 57671 smtpd RET sendto 82/0x52 ---- Any ideas where could be the problem? TIA, Petr From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 18 22:18:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE9C106564A for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 22:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1D58FC14 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 22:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxh11 with SMTP id 11so2769927vxh.13 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:18:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.5.210 with SMTP id 18mr409632vcw.83.1313705900570; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:18:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (twdp-174-109-142-001.nc.res.rr.com [174.109.142.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c13sm1496112vcp.20.2011.08.18.15.18.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:18:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from seibercom.net (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3Rg1yy0K7Pz2CG4y for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:18:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:18:17 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110818181817.0e0c2a9d@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <00e201cc5def$3faf1ef0$bf0d5cd0$@muni.cz> References: <00e201cc5def$3faf1ef0$bf0d5cd0$@muni.cz> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.5; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Postfix - Dovecot SASL problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 22:18:22 -0000 On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:38:58 +0200 Petr Holub articulated: > Any ideas where could be the problem? This question really belongs on either the Postfix or Dovecot forums. I would suggest starting with the Postfix one and proceeding from there. Start with the documentation located here: http://www.postfix.com/DEBUG_README.html Read the "Reporting problems to postfix-users@postfix.org" at the end of that documentation. Be sure to include the output from the saslfinger tool. This can be found at http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/saslfinger/. -- Jerry ✌ jerry+ports@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ Whenever anyone says, "theoretically," they really mean "not really". Dave Parnas From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 18 23:11:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF69E1065670 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:11:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from spartan.hamla.org (spartan.hamla.org [206.251.255.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924B78FC13 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:11:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A0A170E5 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:12:25 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tandon.net; h= user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:subject:from:from:date:date:received; s=aegis; t= 1313709145; bh=rH0UBw/hCdDjn709QuIsodtGrsFSTrLJnaCPbm938xs=; b=S 1YKCJ30HWg4CEVMOkM7xIpRcSjzbacXDr2YeGc2izgwyCqLNfClhrpJGBPjUuWUP fMq2RPX5Nu2RH7ok5/1qrwciP9YunhHDSR731I4/xCy+SoQNp7oW7Db8msNDaSU6 V2kpf78wj6DXWzmYq6t3zWegAFtVXqCVhiLhRvy5+I= X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at spartan.hamla.org Received: from spartan.hamla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spartan.hamla.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with LMTP id 3xugVqyTENig for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:12:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:53 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110818231152.GB308@magic.hamla.org> References: <00e201cc5def$3faf1ef0$bf0d5cd0$@muni.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00e201cc5def$3faf1ef0$bf0d5cd0$@muni.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: Postfix - Dovecot SASL problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:11:56 -0000 [ I agree with Jerry that this question belongs on postfix-users, but I hope my response is helpful ] On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 23:38:58 +0200, Petr Holub wrote: > I'm using mail/postfix with WITH_DOVECOT2=yes and mail/dovecot2 with MySQL > backend for users from FreeBSD ports: > dovecot-2.0.12 > postfix-2.8.4,1 > > I'm unable to get SMTP authentication working using Dovecot SASL with > ---- > postfix/main.cf: Generally, when asking for help with Postfix, it is better to provide the output of 'postconf -n' rather than snippets of your main.cf. > ... > smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous, noplaintext > smtpd_sasl_tls_security_options = noanonymous So you prohibit plaintext SASL authentication unless the session is TLS encrypted. > When attempting to use Dovecot for SMTP SASL auth, what I get is > ---- > 2011-08-18 23:31:57auth: Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/auth > Aug 18 23:31:57 mail postfix/smtpd[57411]: fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms There are no TLS connection lines in your log excerpt; if we assume that no encrypted session was established, then this error makes sense if ... > MECH PLAIN plaintext > MECH LOGIN plaintext dovecot only offers plaintext authentication mechanisms, which you have configured Postfix to explicitly disallow for non-TLS sessions. -- Sahil Tandon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 18 23:19:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3132D106564A for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:19:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout030.mac.com (asmtpout030.mac.com [17.148.16.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF0E8FC12 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:19:11 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp030.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LQ500LIP9Z6AX40@asmtp030.mac.com> for ports@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:18:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813,1.0.211,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-08-18_08:2011-08-18, 2011-08-18, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1108180246 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <00e201cc5def$3faf1ef0$bf0d5cd0$@muni.cz> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:18:41 -0700 Message-id: <6F680A88-344A-43EA-9999-EFA310766657@mac.com> References: <00e201cc5def$3faf1ef0$bf0d5cd0$@muni.cz> To: Petr Holub X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Postfix - Dovecot SASL problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:19:12 -0000 Hi-- On Aug 18, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Petr Holub wrote: > smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous, noplaintext > smtpd_sasl_tls_security_options = noanonymous >From what I've seen in your ktrace, you're only offering "MECH LOGIN plaintext", which isn't going be allowable per the Postfix setting. You need to setup CRAM-MD5 or maybe GSSAPI, or else permit plaintext auth mechanisms if the connection is coming via TLS/SSL: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/CRAM-MD5 Also see: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html "Warning: it appears that clients try authentication methods in the order as advertised by the server (e.g., PLAIN ANONYMOUS CRAM-MD5) which means that if you disable plaintext passwords, clients will log in anonymously, even when they should be able to use CRAM-MD5. So, if you disable plaintext logins, disable anonymous logins too. Postfix treats anonymous login as no authentication." Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 18 23:19:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4931065670 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:19:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52AA58FC14 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id D17785607A; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:19:20 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:19:20 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Helmut Schneider Message-ID: <20110818231920.GB3936@lonesome.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Big patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:19:21 -0000 Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately. GNATS has a spamcatcher for > 500k messages (mostly this catches viruses). Normally I handle such PRs manually before the cleanup process runs, but I forgot to do it this time. (I only took a glance.) Does the plist change dramatically every time the ports are updated? Is there any way around this if so? Such large changes put stress not only on GNATS (it is, after all, a database), but also on the CVS repository when the updates are committed. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 18 23:26:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22861065675 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:26:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from spartan.hamla.org (spartan.hamla.org [206.251.255.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA368FC20 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BC5170E5 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:26:31 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tandon.net; h= user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:subject:from:from:date:date:received; s=aegis; t= 1313709991; bh=BI78u5sIwHtW+lKNShoTd01UUcCpM71XQDaJc22P4HQ=; b=e CoKLZkynM2H7VoP3RFC8nLQoiefEgJwXcS8iQHG6ZJv9aiwjxa6cftl9VxHbDM6G sQ5buGjZepwaz4rv9CnxPX4b0pTJaHzo1Bb3ru/YlPbuIRwe6sKsQ4tu5Iqkoy32 h+qDI6zFeOCl8rA0Lboc99/bOapugAOwjiio0Q/MBA= X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at spartan.hamla.org Received: from spartan.hamla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spartan.hamla.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with LMTP id FZOyIj-hmW70 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:26:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:25:58 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110818232558.GC308@magic.hamla.org> References: <00e201cc5def$3faf1ef0$bf0d5cd0$@muni.cz> <6F680A88-344A-43EA-9999-EFA310766657@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6F680A88-344A-43EA-9999-EFA310766657@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: Postfix - Dovecot SASL problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:26:03 -0000 On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 15:18:41 -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote: >From what I've seen in your ktrace, you're only offering "MECH LOGIN >plaintext", which isn't going be allowable per the Postfix setting. His dovecot configuration also appears to be offering the PLAIN plaintext auth mechanism; not just LOGIN. -- Sahil Tandon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 18 23:36:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263B2106564A for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:36:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout025.mac.com (asmtpout025.mac.com [17.148.16.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8D78FC0C for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:36:03 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LQ500LL0DJYI080@asmtp025.mac.com> for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:35:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.4.6813,1.0.211,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-08-18_09:2011-08-19, 2011-08-18, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1108180259 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <20110818232558.GC308@magic.hamla.org> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:35:58 -0700 Message-id: References: <00e201cc5def$3faf1ef0$bf0d5cd0$@muni.cz> <6F680A88-344A-43EA-9999-EFA310766657@mac.com> <20110818232558.GC308@magic.hamla.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: Subject: Re: Postfix - Dovecot SASL problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:36:04 -0000 On Aug 18, 2011, at 4:25 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: >> From what I've seen in your ktrace, you're only offering "MECH LOGIN >> plaintext", which isn't going be allowable per the Postfix setting. > > His dovecot configuration also appears to be offering the PLAIN > plaintext auth mechanism; not just LOGIN. Yes, that's right-- but they're both plaintext, which Postfix was configured not to allow... Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 18 23:42:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5AD1065674 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:42:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from spartan.hamla.org (spartan.hamla.org [206.251.255.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402BD8FC13 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:42:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D8E170E5 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:42:45 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tandon.net; h= user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:subject:from:from:date:date:received; s=aegis; t= 1313710965; bh=tm4Sa3Ii+LRYae53Bu2h3x9TXCJigr6w+6d9V1N6nTc=; b=L h3HrYL67w39AuRw4NBmSTlUC1+BCtdognivmMPf2E1FioyjKvudk7GFg8/sJKpKd Sf9Itc9z5196rqJZQqrYVPSTRITGzaV5BXutvpEZ5QVqV4cGPL7Znu7QgSIRBV/k vzBpgu/ykusBHyUak7XtF+t3uA76sMH/Ey9bfygcB8= X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at spartan.hamla.org Received: from spartan.hamla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spartan.hamla.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with LMTP id sJCBvSCG6OJI for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:42:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:42:13 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110818234213.GE308@magic.hamla.org> References: <00e201cc5def$3faf1ef0$bf0d5cd0$@muni.cz> <6F680A88-344A-43EA-9999-EFA310766657@mac.com> <20110818232558.GC308@magic.hamla.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: Postfix - Dovecot SASL problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:42:17 -0000 On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 16:35:58 -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Aug 18, 2011, at 4:25 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: > >> From what I've seen in your ktrace, you're only offering "MECH > >> LOGIN plaintext", which isn't going be allowable per the Postfix > >> setting. > > > > His dovecot configuration also appears to be offering the PLAIN > > plaintext auth mechanism; not just LOGIN. > > Yes, that's right-- but they're both plaintext, which Postfix was > configured not to allow... Indeed, as I noted[1] earlier in this thread; I replied to your message for the sake of completeness and posterity. :) [1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-August/069300.html -- Sahil Tandon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 00:05:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49797106564A; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:05:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pranspach@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA19A8FC0A; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:05:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxh11 with SMTP id 11so2833768vxh.13 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:05:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=oNy11MgF3rpob8cIVskmHG/22lplPrT8SZ19gC/E8bQ=; b=Icq+eFgFQpfIt8Fw6NPSXQcqpWZsovwexemjRD1XXyO2I2yAYy5nXHI8sH/PRAjwhV UfGbUp/jyjLuC03P0t21xlSdiKrzo5Us8kKJS2VZOepC2caaUkLWV+0rYg79kDj6UcTK YWz0afZAHUTTDC4yyrulhmoZxHPqL5zumVXcw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.27.233 with SMTP id w9mr1445991vdg.199.1313710790858; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:39:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.163.106 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:39:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:39:50 -0700 Message-ID: From: Patrick Ian To: chromium@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: chromium-13.0.782.112 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:05:03 -0000 Hey, I would like to use the chromedriver target from the chromium port. However, I do not know how to add that target to my local ports chromium configuration. How do I make the chromedriver target? -- -Patrick Ranspach- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 01:21:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505A71065670 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 01:21:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jankyj@unfs.us) Received: from morbid.purplehat.org (morbid.purplehat.org [206.225.83.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E778FC0A for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 01:21:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (morbid.purplehat.org [206.225.83.29]) by morbid.purplehat.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C22985B66E for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:01:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from morbid.purplehat.org ([206.225.83.29]) by localhost (morbid.purplehat.org [206.225.83.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37207-07 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:01:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (mx2.purplehat.org [174.51.182.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ek@purplehat.org) by morbid.purplehat.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA7CE85B0F7 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:01:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E4DB621.1030309@unfs.us> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:02:25 -0600 From: Janketh Jay User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <00e201cc5def$3faf1ef0$bf0d5cd0$@muni.cz> <6F680A88-344A-43EA-9999-EFA310766657@mac.com> <20110818232558.GC308@magic.hamla.org> <20110818234213.GE308@magic.hamla.org> In-Reply-To: <20110818234213.GE308@magic.hamla.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Postfix - Dovecot SASL problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 01:21:10 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/18/2011 05:42 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 16:35:58 -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote: > >> On Aug 18, 2011, at 4:25 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: >>>> From what I've seen in your ktrace, you're only offering "MECH >>>> LOGIN plaintext", which isn't going be allowable per the Postfix >>>> setting. >>> >>> His dovecot configuration also appears to be offering the PLAIN >>> plaintext auth mechanism; not just LOGIN. >> >> Yes, that's right-- but they're both plaintext, which Postfix was >> configured not to allow... > > Indeed, as I noted[1] earlier in this thread; I replied to your message > for the sake of completeness and posterity. :) > > [1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-August/069300.html From what I see, this is exactly correct and the information provided (while not a Postfix or Dovecot mailing list) should definitely be of help. In fact, it is the solution to the problem. Well done! :) Regards, Janky Jay, III -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5NtiEACgkQGK3MsUbJZn4qJQCffNCPfQrzLSw423PZwgLNRG5p 7RoAn2+ubGLvzz2wk/bjn976HIqgAYs7 =JUBJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 07:56:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0FCA1065670 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:56:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4668FC0A for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:56:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QuJvs-0008F0-M7 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:56:00 +0200 Received: from p57915688.dip.t-dialin.net ([87.145.86.136]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:56:00 +0200 Received: from jumper99 by p57915688.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:56:00 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Helmut Schneider" Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:55:50 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <20110818231920.GB3936@lonesome.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p57915688.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: XanaNews/1.19.1.194 X-Ref: news.gmane.org ~XNS:00000028 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 110818-1, 18.08.2011), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: Big patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:56:03 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote: > Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately. > > GNATS has a spamcatcher for > 500k messages (mostly this catches > viruses). Normally I handle such PRs manually before the cleanup > process runs, but I forgot to do it this time. (I only took a > glance.) > > Does the plist change dramatically every time the ports are updated? Yes. > Is there any way around this if so? Such large changes put stress > not only on GNATS (it is, after all, a database), but also on the CVS > repository when the updates are committed. I generated the plist in the past but not very long time ago I was told (and let me quote): "generation the plist is not considered a good practice" :) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 08:10:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3772106564A for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:10:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADC78FC13 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:10:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi36 with SMTP id 36so2811140wwi.31 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 01:10:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=x+QiRAPU/V0IJ9DHgmZa1a2/h5h3a+9zdQe0MLe4YCc=; b=nqINNbrN84ITch/CNZehAVDIc7rvRhzT6ms3mIiuDjjMQv0CJxriS9jk+ntafmeGcH Ekb1efAvxRIlENwvhRWV6iSIeZWHCj7iWjA2Ap43mjZUdAxpJntJiE/Qv6rrT04OZ+s1 94h5raAMit/cK01tvnTmOds0H4XaNjWRWMF74= Received: by 10.216.68.207 with SMTP id l57mr207234wed.46.1313741451116; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 01:10:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.151.230 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 01:10:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20110818231920.GB3936@lonesome.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:10:21 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9akO_Re1IXPh--Cq5DKXfMEW4U4 Message-ID: To: Helmut Schneider Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Big patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:10:52 -0000 On 19 August 2011 08:55, Helmut Schneider wrote: > Mark Linimon wrote: > >> Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately. >> >> GNATS has a spamcatcher for > 500k messages (mostly this catches >> viruses). =A0Normally I handle such PRs manually before the cleanup >> process runs, but I forgot to do it this time. =A0(I only took a >> glance.) >> >> Does the plist change dramatically every time the ports are updated? > > Yes. > >> Is there any way around this if so? =A0Such large changes put stress >> not only on GNATS (it is, after all, a database), but also on the CVS >> repository when the updates are committed. > > I generated the plist in the past but not very long time ago I was told > (and let me quote): "generation the plist is not considered a good > practice" :) > Except when the plist changes dramatically. See Perter's Handbook :) Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 08:53:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D16106564A for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:53:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71818FC0A for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:53:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gate.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.123] helo=h30.sp.ipt.ru) by services.ipt.ru with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1QuKpe-000GKj-OT; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:53:38 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov To: "Helmut Schneider" References: Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:53:37 +0400 In-Reply-To: (Helmut Schneider's message of "Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:22 +0000 (UTC)") Message-ID: <81610638@h30.sp.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Big patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:53:41 -0000 Hi! On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Helmut Schneider wrote: > I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be > avoided=C2=B4at most costs. > Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a "SPAM Filter" or at > least take 2 days until I get reply. See PR159878-81, I submitted the > patches on tuesday. > So, what should I do? Still create full pkg-plists and hope that the > patch passes the FreeBSD PR system or fall back to dynamic pkg-plists? You may try to reduce pkg-plist changes. Are you speaking about www/typo* ports? If yes, those ports have hardcoded PORTVERSION at pkg-plist. One can use make variables to dramatically reduce pkg-plist changes: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/plist.htm= l#PLIST-SUB --=20 WBR, bsam From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 09:54:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05DEA106564A for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:54:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46FA8FC0A for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QuLmc-00066G-3K for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:54:34 +0200 Received: from p57915688.dip.t-dialin.net ([87.145.86.136]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:54:33 +0200 Received: from jumper99 by p57915688.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:54:33 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Helmut Schneider" Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:54:16 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <20110818231920.GB3936@lonesome.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p57915688.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: XanaNews/1.19.1.194 X-Ref: news.gmane.org ~XNS:00000029 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 110818-1, 18.08.2011), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: Big patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:54:40 -0000 Chris Rees wrote: > On 19 August 2011 08:55, Helmut Schneider wrote: > > Mark Linimon wrote: > > > >> Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately. > >> > >> GNATS has a spamcatcher for > 500k messages (mostly this catches > >> viruses).  Normally I handle such PRs manually before the cleanup > >> process runs, but I forgot to do it this time.  (I only took a > >> glance.) > >> > >> Does the plist change dramatically every time the ports are > >> updated? > > > > Yes. > > > >> Is there any way around this if so?  Such large changes put stress > >> not only on GNATS (it is, after all, a database), but also on the > >> CVS repository when the updates are committed. > > > > I generated the plist in the past but not very long time ago I was > > told (and let me quote): "generation the plist is not considered a > > good practice" :) > > > > Except when the plist changes dramatically. See Perter's Handbook :) Will the maintainer who proposed me to create a static plist please stand up, please stand up, please stand up? ;) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 10:18:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91017106564A for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:18:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6FF8FC16 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:18:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QuM9X-0006Qm-C0 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:18:15 +0200 Received: from p57915688.dip.t-dialin.net ([87.145.86.136]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:18:15 +0200 Received: from jumper99 by p57915688.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:18:15 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Helmut Schneider" Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:18:03 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <81610638@h30.sp.ipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p57915688.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: XanaNews/1.19.1.194 X-Ref: news.gmane.org ~XNS:0000002A X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 110818-1, 18.08.2011), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: Big patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:18:16 -0000 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Helmut Schneider wrote: > > > I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be > > avoided´at most costs. > > > Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a "SPAM Filter" or at > > least take 2 days until I get reply. See PR159878-81, I submitted > > the patches on tuesday. > > > So, what should I do? Still create full pkg-plists and hope that the > > patch passes the FreeBSD PR system or fall back to dynamic > > pkg-plists? > > You may try to reduce pkg-plist changes. Are you speaking about > www/typo* ports? If yes, those ports have hardcoded PORTVERSION > at pkg-plist. One can use make variables to dramatically reduce > pkg-plist changes: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/plist.html#PLIST-SUB "dramatically reduce"? How? Currently it seems it gets even bigger: [helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$ ls -s /usr/ports/www/typo3.org/pkg-plist 592 /usr/ports/www/typo3.org/pkg-plist [helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$ ls -s /usr/ports/www/typo3/pkg-plist 672 /usr/ports/www/typo3/pkg-plist [helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 10:24:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74ACF106566B for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:24:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349668FC12 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so2430140gxk.13 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 03:24:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BPWK7a9dITR1WJxbDwgHGG+fn5/V4II1hMh+JNOi8Qc=; b=osF3devwBJ5JUBUpIr+v+bTnQ6/vzv3OFP8pH9RVy38fbk3AYFsQXfydLb1Ks9nzbK GJBKhSMM+ldasjgfSzwACUcLvlvcSUU/qbiIhxY/dwICVZtDKnAhhU3UbxkLRNrtS3tK 1PHiQPdI74+E0vt55itxYLN+otzqMT7heidKU= Received: by 10.236.79.166 with SMTP id i26mr5857963yhe.125.1313749491441; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 03:24:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.182.77 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 03:24:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <81610638@h30.sp.ipt.ru> From: Chris Rees Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:24:21 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BnaAttSJdaxKotu-rPyJPtKt9x8 Message-ID: To: Helmut Schneider Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Big patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:24:52 -0000 On 19 August 2011 11:18, Helmut Schneider wrote: > Boris Samorodov wrote: > >> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Helmut Schneider wrote: >> >> > I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be >> > avoided=B4at most costs. >> >> > Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a "SPAM Filter" or at >> > least take 2 days until I get reply. See PR159878-81, I submitted >> > the patches on tuesday. >> >> > So, what should I do? Still create full pkg-plists and hope that the >> > patch passes the FreeBSD PR system or fall back to dynamic >> > pkg-plists? >> >> You may try to reduce pkg-plist changes. Are you speaking about >> www/typo* ports? If yes, those ports have hardcoded PORTVERSION >> at pkg-plist. One can use make variables to dramatically reduce >> pkg-plist changes: >> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/plist.h= tml#PLIST-SUB > > "dramatically reduce"? How? Currently it seems it gets even bigger: > > [helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$ ls -s /usr/ports/www/typo3.org/pkg-plist > =A0592 /usr/ports/www/typo3.org/pkg-plist > [helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$ ls -s /usr/ports/www/typo3/pkg-plist > =A0672 /usr/ports/www/typo3/pkg-plist > [helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$ > Just the once, but then the _changes_ each time it's updated are smaller. Remember, we keep our ports in CVS, so every _change_ takes up space. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 14:33:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6E3106564A for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:33:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B788FC0C for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:33:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so1961259gwb.13 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:33:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LMhnVkVx1cARamQrGK0VlW96nhySqMCWi17qmghUges=; b=e44MrEN8o7Be/2Q5fJjnd7ZosbnAa/2SFB+zdQD/eASz2TKV+MXV1zcdlYLyUy5ZAo yNMFkm7M/Dk+rVJ774r/Wb392TwWLpGxPuCIeZF9ttlubqlRdeaisFui79Pf4TcItu42 541+4UQ3cijcvdxfnio5WPTsGUexTH+XfYErs= Received: by 10.236.176.33 with SMTP id a21mr7803342yhm.108.1313764393287; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:33:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.182.77 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:32:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Rees Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:32:43 +0100 Message-ID: To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Extra fields in INDEX X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:33:14 -0000 Hi all, I'm having a look at modifying INDEX to have a field at the end (to cause minimum breakage), but I've discovered that in a few ports there (6630 out of 22731) appears to be extra 'stuff' in fields past field 10 (which is for the first WWW: line in pkg-descr). Can anyone with knowledge of make index explain why this is happening? Using the command line at [1] gets a list [crees@hydra]~% alias findextrasinindex "< `make -C /usr/ports -V INDEXDIR`/`make -C /usr/ports -V INDEXFILE` grep -n '^\([^|]*|\)\{11\}[^|]\+'" [crees@hydra]~% findextrasinindex | wc -l 6630 [crees@hydra]~% findextrasinindex | cut -d '|' -f 2 | head /usr/ports/accessibility/atk /usr/ports/accessibility/gnome-mag /usr/ports/accessibility/ruby-atk /usr/ports/archivers/dpkg /usr/ports/archivers/fastjar /usr/ports/archivers/lrzip /usr/ports/archivers/ocaml-bz2 /usr/ports/archivers/ocaml-zip /usr/ports/archivers/p5-Archive-Any /usr/ports/archivers/p5-Archive-Extract [crees@hydra]~% make -C /usr/ports/accessibility/atk describe atk-2.0.1|/usr/ports/accessibility/atk|/usr/local|A GNOME accessibility toolkit (ATK)|/usr/ports/accessibility/atk/pkg-descr|gnome@FreeBSD.org|accessibilit= y devel||/usr/ports/devel/libtool||/usr/ports/devel/gettext /usr/ports/devel/glib20 /usr/ports/devel/gmake /usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection /usr/ports/devel/libtool /usr/ports/devel/pkg-config|/usr/ports/devel/gettext /usr/ports/devel/gio-fam-backend /usr/ports/devel/glib20 /usr/ports/devel/pkg-config|http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gap/ [crees@hydra]~% make -C /usr/ports/archivers/fastjar describe fastjar-0.93.20060808|/usr/ports/archivers/fastjar|/usr/local|A version of JDK's `jar' command written entirely in C|/usr/ports/archivers/fastjar/pkg-descr|maho@FreeBSD.org|archivers java|/usr/ports/lang/perl5.12|/usr/ports/lang/perl5.12||/usr/ports/devel/gm= ake /usr/ports/lang/perl5.12||http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/fastjar But in INDEX: [crees@hydra]~% findextrasinindex | grep '^[^:]\+:[fa][at][sk]\(tjar\)\?-' 7:atk-2.0.1|/usr/ports/accessibility/atk|/usr/local|A GNOME accessibility toolkit (ATK)|/usr/ports/accessibility/atk/pkg-descr|gnome@FreeBSD.org|accessibilit= y devel|cairo-1.10.2_2,1 expat-2.0.1_1 fontconfig-2.8.0_1,1 freetype2-2.4.6 gamin-0.1.10_4 gettext-0.18.1.1 gio-fam-backend-2.28.8 glib-2.28.8 gmake-3.82 gobject-introspection-0.10.8 kbproto-1.0.5 libX11-1.3.6,1 libXau-1.0.6 libXdmcp-1.0.3 libXrender-0.9.5 libffi-3.0.9 libiconv-1.13.1_1 libpthread-stubs-0.3_3 libtool-2.4 libxcb-1.7 pcre-8.13 perl-5.12.4_1 pixman-0.22.0 pkg-config-0.25_1 png-1.4.8 python27-2.7.2_1 renderproto-0.11 xcb-util-0.3.6_1 xproto-7.0.16|gamin-0.1.10_4 gettext-0.18.1.1 gio-fam-backend-2.28.8 glib-2.28.8 libiconv-1.13.1_1 pcre-8.13 perl-5.12.4_1 pkg-config-0.25_1 python27-2.7.2_1|http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gap/||libtool-2.4| 60:fastjar-0.93.20060808|/usr/ports/archivers/fastjar|/usr/local|A version of JDK's `jar' command written entirely in C|/usr/ports/archivers/fastjar/pkg-descr|maho@FreeBSD.org|archivers java|gettext-0.18.1.1 gmake-3.82 libiconv-1.13.1_1 perl-5.12.4_1||http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/fastjar|perl-5.12.4_1|pe= rl-5.12.4_1| They have extra fields on the end ... Where have they come from?? Chris --=20 Chris Rees =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| FreeBSD Developer crees@FreeBSD.org =A0 | http://people.freebsd.org/~crees From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 15:15:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981B81065676 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:15:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524EF8FC1A for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywo32 with SMTP id 32so2625935ywo.13 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:15:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Hyv9dh5mGwcdMBJAOpZG2i8ACjKNQRk/fYkqUrUd4js=; b=AoVK0/3AwfzVtakJwVlr03ux/xNDQL9cdFHY6bxQeuGzqXtDw7XRzYI2PSBhEVgQZx YeFW5uK/qh5pGUfhCgjBFx/uQoviURfcVCGjhMbRgoRjfoP+gVQf/wTbA8GZLjrQ5sD4 CQejdxxgYGzlU/KAIDDjEDW+JWahUjmfqHeHU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.176.33 with SMTP id a21mr8138462yhm.108.1313766930490; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:15:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.182.77 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:15:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.182.77 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:15:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E4CBBEE.4040302@FreeBSD.org> References: <201108171436.p7HEaNYQ071778@fire.js.berklix.net> <20110817161554.GA2496@lonesome.com> <4e4cc750.GqJImeHzdv6k8zld%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4E4CBBEE.4040302@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:15:28 +0100 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Matthias Andree Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysutils/diskcheckd needs fixing and a maintainer X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:15:31 -0000 On 18 Aug 2011 08:15, "Matthias Andree" wrote: > > Am 18.08.2011 08:20, schrieb Chris Rees: > > On 18 August 2011 09:03, wrote: > >> Chris Rees wrote: > >> > >>> We don't want to provide broken software. > >> > >> Mark Linimon wrote: > >> > >>> ... it's obsolete, broken, junk ... > >> > >> Unless there is more to this than is reported in those two PRs, > >> I'd call it a considerable exaggeration to describe diskcheckd > >> as "broken". > >> > >> * http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/115853 > >> is shown as "closed", so presumably is no longer a problem. > > > > Wow, would it have been too difficult to actually READ the closing > > message from Jeremy? I suggest you look again -- I've pasted it here > > so you can see it. > > > > "The problem here is that the code does not do what the manpage says (or > > vice-versa). The 3rd column does not specify frequency of checking, but > > rather, over what duration of time to spread a single disk scan over. > > Thus, 7 days would mean "spread the entire disk check at X rate over the > > course of 7 days". There is still a bug in the code where large disks > > will cause problems resulting in updateproctitle() never getting called, > > and so on, but that's unrelated to this PR. I'm closing the PR because > > trying to fix all of this should really be ben@'s responsibility. > > (Sorry for sounding harsh.)" > > > > How does that indicate it's fixed? It's an 'abandoned' PR. > > This would be a case for marking it suspended (or possibly analyzed, > depending on which of these two fits best), rather than closing it. > The status is also a statement... > > > Thank you for testing and investigating, this is what the port has > > needed, and two days of being deprecated has achieved more than 18 > > months of a PR being open. > > So the bottom line for this case is, we sometimes only get sufficient > attention through deprecating ports. Unfortunately that approach might > wear off some day. Too bad. :-( I don't see how, ignoring a PR, nothing happens. Ignore a depreciation, port dies! Let's get this straight, I was not 'attracting attention', I was saying 'I'm going to remove this port; it's been broken for over a year.' > Do we need a "think twice before adding a port" habit? Yes. Of course, these aren't pointless ports however; while still developed and maintained they were once useful. It's time to go when they break and bitrot. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 15:47:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84F1106564A for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:47:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305848FC08 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBDC10.dip.t-dialin.net [93.203.220.16]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p7JFlPoC039975; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:47:26 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p7JFlC7X035038; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:47:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7JFl0FI010126; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:47:06 GMT (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201108191547.p7JFl0FI010126@fire.js.berklix.net> To: ports@freebsd.org From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Thu, 18 Aug 2011 02:57:17 +0200." <201108180057.p7I0vH1B070035@fire.js.berklix.net> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:47:00 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: Vadim Goncharov Subject: Ports & Packages infrastructure & feature import. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:47:28 -0000 Hi ports team, cc: Vadim Goncharov Senior/ central ports team people who are competent, happy & authorised to hack in /usr/ports/Mk/* & on pkg tools etc, please notice ports & package infrastructure ideas in thread: From Vadim Goncharov Wed Aug 17 23:25:37 UTC 2011 http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2011-August/011412.html Q: How might you get more time to implement / import such ideas ? A: Leave normal individual ports work to other ports maintainers. & ... Q: How will other ports maintainers cope too ? A: Reduce ports/ send-pr flow rate. Add this to send-pr: --- Do not use send-pr for problems in 3rd party software please. For bugs & fixes with generic 3rd party code (from distfiles/), contact (from ports/.../.../Makefile ): GENERIC_MAINTAINER="URL://....." For FreeBSD specific bugs, try to fix first, if fixed use send-pr, For FreeBSD specific bugs you can't fix, contact MAINTAINER= If the port has a problematic run time behaviour, ask to assert: INSTALL_DEPRECATED="summary ... suspended send-pr number" --- No sense FreeBSD accepting more send-pr than we can handle, (else it could pressurise us to dump a port in desperation to reduce send-prs, for lack of an interim INSTALL_DEPRECATED mechanism, per: Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 02:57:17 +0200 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Message-id: <201108180057.p7I0vH1B070035@fire.js.berklix.net> Subject: Re: sysutils/diskcheckd needs fixing and a maintainer http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-August/069288.html If we reduce the rate of ports/ send-prs, ports experts will have more time to step back from the coal face, to study & import more good ideas, whether from FreeBSD people, other BSD or Linux etc. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below, not above; Indent with "> "; Cumulative like a play script. Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 17:04:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44174106564A for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:04:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16C58FC14 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:04:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi36 with SMTP id 36so3290778wwi.31 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:04:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=U34TWhlWVHUf+3MbD/2AqSyH4nRsNTTTKCcX8PDsjSs=; b=JHF9vn29/0vYVl7EBlJ65BltRj5LM4gEJp6gaDJ+U7u+2ItQ3TqV+XIepbBBfG5Pq0 u2LQInVD9jdin4hiFMLJu6tWp1ap8GvD5yDcM9ReGcFLmCO+RzQt9aA4q9W2eKKm4xTj pATFFqfOPJCq/j+U69cVOny2XgYGCXvEzeWFg= Received: by 10.227.155.8 with SMTP id q8mr1927744wbw.100.1313773476780; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:04:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Melon.malikania.fr (65.21.102.84.rev.sfr.net [84.102.21.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ga18sm2732180wbb.5.2011.08.19.10.04.33 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:04:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E4E9788.6070307@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 19:04:08 +0200 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110715 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [patch] mplayer and faad PR still not committed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:04:38 -0000 Hi, Can someone please take a look at this ?.. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158501 Thanks -- David Demelier From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 17:07:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9B5106566C for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB8C8FC14 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:07:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iye7 with SMTP id 7so11006893iye.17 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:07:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=b+T42OEuRVYyGSAwQPPEL+VsAHX5aQzqyC0+oU7Q3/Y=; b=LuokVQ6+TSPhkTD+6T96qvo2CENl6/YBn+nmJ8j2/iHn3SY6uotJ34XwRezLpqogqU Z39agDXU74ghapg46kkRHkn2d2q3H3Regqia3gddIbJd99EYQYvfKgNQyB0eozQ8kO/U 3MJWnEJsf03xcI/6ssjjnxh76bdQ8/CR3HDTQ= Received: by 10.231.2.13 with SMTP id 13mr3528522ibh.59.1313773659077; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:07:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.182.77 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:07:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E4E9788.6070307@gmail.com> References: <4E4E9788.6070307@gmail.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:07:09 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7lwfH4_sPIzkckG4PHXFDKLM8c8 Message-ID: To: David Demelier Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [patch] mplayer and faad PR still not committed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:07:40 -0000 On 19 August 2011 18:04, David Demelier wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone please take a look at this ?.. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158501 > I'm on it. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 20:02:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312271065670 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:02:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naddy@mips.inka.de) Received: from mail-in-16.arcor-online.net (mail-in-16.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9FB8FC13 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-in-01-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-01-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.13]) by mx.arcor.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC7E83C7 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:32:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-in-17.arcor-online.net (mail-in-17.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.57]) by mail-in-01-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CC915B59C for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:32:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (dslb-094-218-182-082.pools.arcor-ip.net [94.218.182.82]) by mail-in-17.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC365CBCC5 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:32:22 +0200 (CEST) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-17.arcor-online.net EC365CBCC5 Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p7JJWMe9073547 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:32:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from naddy@localhost) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id p7JJWMDF073546 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:32:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from naddy) Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:32:22 +0200 From: Christian Weisgerber To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110819193222.GA73212@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: clang vs. schilyware X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:02:31 -0000 It looks like a number of pieces of software by Joerg "schily" Schilling fail to build with clang. A little program avoffset is built and run to generate a header file. If compiled with clang, avoffset gets stuck in an infinite loop. sysutils/sdd is affected by this. Presumably, devel/smake and archivers/star would also suffer from this, but they ignore the CC=clang setting and compile with cc. (I haven't looked at other schilyware.) The problem also shows up elsewhere, e.g., here for cdrtools on MaxOS X: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/30310 -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 21:40:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BEF1065670; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:40:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F63114ECD5; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:40:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E4ED852.3050802@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:40:34 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110819 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mm@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: ImageMagick fails to install X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:40:35 -0000 This is on 7.x i386. Builds fine, and passes all self-tests. Thanks, Doug ( cd PerlMagick && gmake CC='cc -std=gnu99 -std=gnu99' && \ gmake CC='cc -std=gnu99 -std=gnu99' install ) gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/local/tmp/usr/ports/graphics/ImageMagick-nox11/work/ImageMagick-6.7.0-10/PerlMagick' cp Magick.pm blib/lib/Image/Magick.pm AutoSplitting blib/lib/Image/Magick.pm (blib/lib/auto/Image/Magick) /usr/local/bin/perl5.12.4 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.12.4/ExtUtils/xsubpp -typemap /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.4/ExtUtils/typemap Magick.xs > Magick.xsc && mv Magick.xsc Magick.c Could not find a typemap for C type 'Image::Magick' in Magick.xs, line 2404 gmake[3]: *** [Magick.c] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/tmp/usr/ports/graphics/ImageMagick-nox11/work/ImageMagick-6.7.0-10/PerlMagick' gmake[2]: *** [install-exec-perl] Error 2 -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 21:50:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F811065672; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:50:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F268FC0A; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p7JLowP2030121 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:50:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p7JLowaY030120; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:50:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA15715; Fri, 19 Aug 11 14:47:53 PDT Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:47:33 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: utisoft@gmail.com Message-Id: <4e4f3c65.SWjpvhhzZjBepdJu%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <201108171436.p7HEaNYQ071778@fire.js.berklix.net> <20110817161554.GA2496@lonesome.com> <4e4cc750.GqJImeHzdv6k8zld%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4E4CBBEE.4040302@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mandree@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysutils/diskcheckd needs fixing and a maintainer X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:50:59 -0000 Chris Rees wrote: > On 18 Aug 2011 08:15, "Matthias Andree" wrote: > > Am 18.08.2011 08:20, schrieb Chris Rees: > > > On 18 August 2011 09:03, wrote: > > >> Chris Rees wrote: > > >> > > >>> We don't want to provide broken software. > > >> > > >> Mark Linimon wrote: > > >> > > >>> ... it's obsolete, broken, junk ... > > >> > > >> Unless there is more to this than is reported in those two > > >> PRs, I'd call it a considerable exaggeration to describe > > >> diskcheckd as "broken". > > >> > > >> * http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/115853 > > >> is shown as "closed", so presumably is no longer a problem. > > > > > > Wow, would it have been too difficult to actually READ the > > > closing message from Jeremy? I suggest you look again -- I've > > > pasted it here so you can see it. > > > > > > "The problem here is that the code does not do what the > > > manpage says (or vice-versa). The 3rd column does not specify > > > frequency of checking, but rather, over what duration of time > > > to spread a single disk scan over. Thus, 7 days would mean > > > "spread the entire disk check at X rate over the course of 7 > > > days" ... I'm closing the PR because trying to fix all of this > > > should really be ben@'s responsibility ... > > > > > > How does that indicate it's fixed? It's an 'abandoned' PR. If it's OK to close a PR without fixing it, because no one seems interested, maybe we should just close 143566 and be done with it :>-> The only "problem" I can see WRT 115853 is that someone misread the manpage. To me, it is clear that diskcheckd provides two _alternative_ ways of specifying how much bandwidth it should consume: diskcheckd.conf specifies either a length of time over which to spread each pass, or an average data rate. In either case it runs continuously, not intermittently. How else should one interpret the sentence "Naturally, it would be contradictory to specify both the frequency and the rate, so only one of these should be specified."? So it is correct that 115853 is "closed", because it wasn't valid in the first place. The program works as designed. > ... Let's get this straight, I was not 'attracting attention', > I was saying 'I'm going to remove this port; it's been broken > for over a year.' ... which might be justifiable, if it were in fact broken, but AFAICT it is not. I've been running it for a little less than two days now, on a drive which contains a gmirror, and have yet to see it misbehave. (The HDD indicator does stay on, but this is not surprising given that, as noted above, diskcheckd is expected to run continuously.) > > Do we need a "think twice before adding a port" habit? > > Yes. Of course, these aren't pointless ports however; while > still developed and maintained they were once useful. IIUC, diskcheckd started out in base and was later moved to ports (for reasons that are not obvious). I can't see that it is any less useful now than when first developed, or when moved from base to ports. > It's time to go when they break and bitrot. For some definition of "break and bitrot." Again, I haven't seen any actual breakage. diskcheckd could use a little tweaking, e.g. diskcheckd.conf.sample contains a stale reference to "the diskcheckd.conf(5) manual page" which was presumably missed when diskcheckd was moved to ports; it should now be "the diskcheckd(8) manual page". BTW how does one go about fixing a FreeBSD-native port like this? Since we are the upstream, it would make more sense to revise the distfile than to add a patch in the port. I didn't find any mention of this in the Porter's Handbook. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 20 00:25:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C391065672 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 00:25:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mouf.net (mouf.net [204.109.58.86]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E038FC08 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 00:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from meatwad.mouf.net (cpe-065-190-149-241.nc.res.rr.com [65.190.149.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by mouf.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7K0PkmG011230 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:25:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4E4EFF09.8020207@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:25:45 -0400 From: Steve Wills User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110531 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (mouf.net [204.109.58.86]); Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:25:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.2 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: [HEADS UP] Ruby 1.9 will become the default Ruby version this weekend X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 00:25:48 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Barring objections, I'm planning to commit this patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~swills/ruby19_and_gems_changes6.diff tomorrow. It will update Ruby 1.9 and make it the default version. If you wish to continue using Ruby 1.8, set RUBY_VER= 1.8 in /etc/make.conf. There are still some ports which do not work with Ruby 1.9, but most work OK. If you have any objections or questions, please let me know. Thanks, Steve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOTv8JAAoJEPXPYrMgexuhaNgH/i2eFYkup3RKbaIxFWhT9SxC C1p3f2UFtNO9Yqo62Y8+oYq8WG5SYEVD+duP/0hQO2d27NGWZh1la+wQP3fTePMn OWOFF6HL9gF6TsmKZiziKyQoq1WRdt47p07xRw/hTHhOa0tMMgl/nrR4Oi6tmLah KvTqOT1oA01GDPekDbxNpUke+VqnPzUjMHQrG/2ClHAYJSxf+vhjLnaLxUbdxZQb fUaWmsfcHJ81MsNuvof/Ehlxq6XbD712Fho9BG91b/lRIvGrFW2KxYhXUew1HXi4 d9kyKtrwnCnGF8eiBmPSL0hArDXZxwqAna9S89U6vThQSYSZ94Q2rwJsSyRsgP0= =NqG6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 20 07:37:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25994106566B for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 07:37:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@drenet.info) Received: from arpnet.drenet.info (arpnet.drenet.info [174.136.104.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C290A8FC18 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 07:37:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [10.0.0.5]) by arpnet.drenet.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB0AF2CAC for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 02:17:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from arpnet.drenet.info ([10.0.0.5]) by localhost (arpnet.drenet.info [10.0.0.5]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85350-04 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 02:17:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from desktop.drenet.local (c-98-199-43-234.hsd1.tx.comcast.net [98.199.43.234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: andre@drenet.info) by arpnet.drenet.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D838F2BA4 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 02:17:21 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4E4F5F80.5090109@drenet.info> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 02:17:20 -0500 From: Andre Goree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110707 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4E4ED852.3050802@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E4ED852.3050802@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ImageMagick fails to install X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 07:37:29 -0000 On 08/19/2011 16:40, Doug Barton wrote: > This is on 7.x i386. Builds fine, and passes all self-tests. > > > Thanks, > > Doug > > > ( cd PerlMagick&& gmake CC='cc -std=gnu99 -std=gnu99'&& \ > gmake CC='cc -std=gnu99 -std=gnu99' install ) > gmake[3]: Entering directory > `/usr/local/tmp/usr/ports/graphics/ImageMagick-nox11/work/ImageMagick-6.7.0-10/PerlMagick' > cp Magick.pm blib/lib/Image/Magick.pm > AutoSplitting blib/lib/Image/Magick.pm (blib/lib/auto/Image/Magick) > /usr/local/bin/perl5.12.4 > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.12.4/ExtUtils/xsubpp -typemap > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.4/ExtUtils/typemap Magick.xs> Magick.xsc&& > mv Magick.xsc Magick.c > Could not find a typemap for C type 'Image::Magick' in Magick.xs, line 2404 > gmake[3]: *** [Magick.c] Error 1 > gmake[3]: Leaving directory > `/usr/local/tmp/usr/ports/graphics/ImageMagick-nox11/work/ImageMagick-6.7.0-10/PerlMagick' > gmake[2]: *** [install-exec-perl] Error 2 > > I have this same issue, created a post on this list a few days ago. I'm running 8.2-RELEASE-p2 amd64. -- Andre Goree andre@drenet.info From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 20 09:34:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06804106566C for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 09:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0B58FC0A for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 09:34:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iye7 with SMTP id 7so13011842iye.17 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 02:34:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=LglKZtDlSCshyE5na6LMZON+ctzdlLUpadP82t3cmLg=; b=cH2f6e5n1LAm95chuG5z/5J3KPYIqJR3Ww1xoeqCjZrUIfayGHWUWDdv3tXg2zU5Vy infoZfXO3fAz/MukpviKgp30EI7NagX6Of68vtiGyMgO1e2pl3YrRPDGp1FbtBvjms6J z05t+09NYptZvjPGiWgNIbG/KZ6j4Bd20AV98= Received: by 10.231.2.13 with SMTP id 13mr871955ibh.59.1313832848118; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 02:34:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.182.77 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 02:33:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Rees Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:33:38 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: gc2wDnkiVfWR0ia0Y760uHOsk6U Message-ID: To: Thomas Zander Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Christian Weisgerber , David Demelier , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/158501: [patch] multimedia/mplayer: faad dependency problem [was] Re: [patch] mplayer and faad PR still not committed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 09:34:09 -0000 On 20 August 2011 08:25, Thomas Zander wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 22:19, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > >> I mean just add an unconditional CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--disable-faad >> instead of yet another option nobody needs. > > I agree. There is no reason to pull in external dependencies for > codecs covered by ffmpeg. > Yup, that's fine. Testing now... Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 20 10:42:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068A41065670; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:42:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CD18FC08; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iye7 with SMTP id 7so13202956iye.17 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 03:42:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=i7zv7kO3WF55SwGwv4YjI6a8AtRYHV0bTn1Q5rEi4QM=; b=FPZZYPUCpsbphoNmXwFk59wwINUVs2BEQgs+jCIsDZwm8HWhu/NEqaqiGp4aCzDFSi 0XtD2isbsOJ826gKPLmNKpai+/Hxiau5/PD0VteapSTxrIHvXRfLSOtlhQuHi/1n6JZX jmXVv+8Oegi+mm5AYuNGTANzRKrNYGiQt9Q3Y= Received: by 10.42.79.206 with SMTP id s14mr439691ick.348.1313836977056; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 03:42:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.182.77 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 03:42:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4e4f3c65.SWjpvhhzZjBepdJu%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <201108171436.p7HEaNYQ071778@fire.js.berklix.net> <20110817161554.GA2496@lonesome.com> <4e4cc750.GqJImeHzdv6k8zld%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4E4CBBEE.4040302@FreeBSD.org> <4e4f3c65.SWjpvhhzZjBepdJu%perryh@pluto.rain.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:42:27 +0100 Message-ID: To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: mandree@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysutils/diskcheckd needs fixing and a maintainer X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:42:58 -0000 On 20 August 2011 05:47, wrote: >=A0I've been running it for a little less than > two days now, on a drive which contains a gmirror, and have yet > to see it misbehave. =A0(The HDD indicator does stay on, but this is > not surprising given that, as noted above, diskcheckd is expected > to run continuously.) Thank you very much for taking the time to investigate. >> > Do we need a "think twice before adding a port" habit? >> >> Yes. Of course, these aren't pointless ports however; while >> still developed and maintained they were once useful. > > IIUC, diskcheckd started out in base and was later moved to ports > (for reasons that are not obvious). =A0I can't see that it is any > less useful now than when first developed, or when moved from base > to ports. > >> It's time to go when they break and bitrot. > > For some definition of "break and bitrot." =A0Again, I haven't > seen any actual breakage. =A0diskcheckd could use a little tweaking, > e.g. diskcheckd.conf.sample contains a stale reference to "the > diskcheckd.conf(5) manual page" which was presumably missed when > diskcheckd was moved to ports; it should now be "the diskcheckd(8) > manual page". > > BTW how does one go about fixing a FreeBSD-native port like this? > Since we are the upstream, it would make more sense to revise the > distfile than to add a patch in the port. =A0I didn't find any mention > of this in the Porter's Handbook. > This is an unusual case where the sources are kept in the files/ subdir of the port's directory-- nowadays we'd put it in a separate distfile. However, for this case please feel free to submit a diff to the sources there and they can stay as long as the port remains useful. If you can't reproduce the problem I'll ask the submitter of ports/143566 if he still can. Is it logging to syslog? Also, would you be happy to take maintainership of this port? Chris --=20 Chris Rees =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| FreeBSD Developer crees@FreeBSD.org =A0 | http://people.freebsd.org/~crees From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 20 11:24:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3023106564A for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:24:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [199.48.134.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E9758FC15 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82671 invoked by uid 0); 20 Aug 2011 07:09:59 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO schism.local) (gjb@76.124.49.145) by 0 with SMTP; 20 Aug 2011 07:09:59 -0400 Message-ID: <4E4F95FD.907@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 07:09:49 -0400 From: Glen Barber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7771432AC58FD65A5C21018E" Cc: Subject: [Request for Comments] Adding a JAILED meta-variable to bsd.port.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:24:43 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7771432AC58FD65A5C21018E Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080006040103020808090505" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080006040103020808090505 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I would like to propose a change to bsd.port.mk which, similarly to obtaining the OSVERSION, checks if the system on which a port is being built is a jailed environment. This change can allow port maintainers to mark ports that do not run in jailed environments as IGNORE, or adjust PKG_MESSAGE to inform the user of special conditions or changes that will be needed to run a port from within a jail. One particular example of the latter is databases/postgresql*-server, where the user must enable security.jail.sysvipc_allowed. I am sure this feature could expand to other cases I have not considered yet, as well. I have included three patches: 0-Mk-bsd.port.mk.txt - the proposed change to bsd.port.mk 1-ircservices-Makefile.txt - an example usage of disallowing a port from being built within a jail 2-sshguard-Makefile.txt - an example usage of disabling a port from being built within a jail conditionally (in this example, it is assumed security/sshguard-pf is the target port) Comments, etc, are welcome. Regards, Glen --=20 Glen Barber | gjb@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Documentation Project --------------080006040103020808090505 Content-Type: text/plain; name="0-Mk-bsd.port.mk.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0-Mk-bsd.port.mk.txt" --- bsd.port.mk.orig 2011-08-12 12:39:23.000000000 -0400 +++ bsd.port.mk 2011-08-20 06:15:19.644576050 -0400 @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ # "FreeBSD," "NetBSD," or "OpenBSD" as appropriate. # OSREL - The release version (numeric) of the operating system. # OSVERSION - The value of __FreeBSD_version. +# JAILED - The system is a FreeBSD jail. # # This is the beginning of the list of all variables that need to be # defined in a port, listed in order that they should be included @@ -1196,6 +1197,11 @@ .endif .endif =20 +# Check if the system is a jail +.if !defined(JAILED) +JAILED!=3D ${SYSCTL} -n security.jail.jailed +.endif + MASTERDIR?=3D ${.CURDIR} =20 .if ${MASTERDIR} !=3D ${.CURDIR} --------------080006040103020808090505 Content-Type: text/plain; name="1-ircservices-Makefile.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="1-ircservices-Makefile.txt" --- Makefile.orig 2009-08-31 09:50:55.000000000 -0400 +++ Makefile 2011-08-20 06:14:04.987796133 -0400 @@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ =20 .include =20 +.if ${JAILED} +IGNORE=3D Does not run from within a jail +.endif + .if ${OSVERSION} > 700042 CFLAGS+=3D -fno-stack-protector .endif --------------080006040103020808090505 Content-Type: text/plain; name="2-sshguard-Makefile.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="2-sshguard-Makefile.txt" --- Makefile.orig 2011-07-24 14:16:29.000000000 -0400 +++ Makefile 2011-08-20 06:14:24.513106022 -0400 @@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D --mandir=3D${MANPREFIX}/man =20 .if ${SSHGUARDFW} =3D=3D pf +. if ${JAILED} +IGNORE=3D Cannot use with pf within a jail +. endif PKGMSG_FWBLOCK=3D" To activate or configure PF see http://sshguard.sf.n= et/doc/setup/blockingpf.html" .elif ${SSHGUARDFW} =3D=3D ipfw PKGMSG_FWBLOCK=3D" Verify that IPFW is active with \"ipfw show\"." --------------080006040103020808090505-- --------------enig7771432AC58FD65A5C21018E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOT5YGAAoJEFJPDDeguUajzXIIALR/wDzHN7+2KVNduUr6g+37 m8t463rMGZLxWQLCbKTuYKD150qG6ADUMK/RHY7nNHmcuiZFltCMHOpXtCEQB3re rjnrmqrNw/EwDm4LR3pgKnjfjMwY/AKXfex6JxN/9Q7QBrqH31FFcSZa5Q9dkFRA DGTpsqD9d8pjnGEhGeNGl5O1XBte3HFG5lyRwjyg6/nxuopr+QC3HeJ9Rs9FHYfh VT0B+V1MT4NSNIUwvfknIfXYqg2ykAQGIbi1XOm3BtGIsmUhmsOcQTkaiJj+yM/J UDcx1jtH8ZD1djckmkrSARktKWM5IGsBVcRS1EduNCjAfD5H+ggh73b/jE0zxtc= =jqt9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7771432AC58FD65A5C21018E-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 20 11:52:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEFB106564A; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:52:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from mail.zoral.com.ua (mx0.zoral.com.ua [91.193.166.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF298FC18; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:52:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by mail.zoral.com.ua (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p7KBq3oV048720 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 20 Aug 2011 14:52:03 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7KBq3fS084977; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 14:52:03 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p7KBq3E0084976; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 14:52:03 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 14:52:03 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov To: Glen Barber Message-ID: <20110820115203.GH17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <4E4F95FD.907@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CxlMVwprXkXvo17J" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E4F95FD.907@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Request for Comments] Adding a JAILED meta-variable to bsd.port.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:52:08 -0000 --CxlMVwprXkXvo17J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 07:09:49AM -0400, Glen Barber wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I would like to propose a change to bsd.port.mk which, similarly to > obtaining the OSVERSION, checks if the system on which a port is being > built is a jailed environment. >=20 > This change can allow port maintainers to mark ports that do not run in > jailed environments as IGNORE, or adjust PKG_MESSAGE to inform the user > of special conditions or changes that will be needed to run a port from > within a jail. One particular example of the latter is > databases/postgresql*-server, where the user must enable > security.jail.sysvipc_allowed. I am sure this feature could expand to > other cases I have not considered yet, as well. I do not think this is good idea. The machine or environment where the port is built sometimes (or, in my setups, quite often) is not the same as where it is run. Your proposal gives a tool to tightly tie the ports to build environments, that is detrimental for some setups, and also diminish the value of packaging. IMHO. --CxlMVwprXkXvo17J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk5Pn+IACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4jrTgCfd5krJMLW8UODZIpKK+FHZppu zT8An0MJDnhIPyHxDzyXn3PGQF0Q38rE =QwZ5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CxlMVwprXkXvo17J-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 20 12:16:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446D4106566B for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:16:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [199.48.134.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 056128FC15 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83791 invoked by uid 0); 20 Aug 2011 08:16:16 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO schism.local) (gjb@76.124.49.145) by 0 with SMTP; 20 Aug 2011 08:16:16 -0400 Message-ID: <4E4FA589.7070303@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 08:16:09 -0400 From: Glen Barber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kostik Belousov References: <4E4F95FD.907@FreeBSD.org> <20110820115203.GH17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20110820115203.GH17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE4289E3EDB6EC491716708FF" Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Request for Comments] Adding a JAILED meta-variable to bsd.port.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:16:18 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE4289E3EDB6EC491716708FF Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------020809040101020209070607" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020809040101020209070607 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 8/20/11 7:52 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 07:09:49AM -0400, Glen Barber wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to propose a change to bsd.port.mk which, similarly to >> obtaining the OSVERSION, checks if the system on which a port is being= >> built is a jailed environment. >> >> This change can allow port maintainers to mark ports that do not run i= n >> jailed environments as IGNORE, or adjust PKG_MESSAGE to inform the use= r >> of special conditions or changes that will be needed to run a port fro= m >> within a jail. One particular example of the latter is >> databases/postgresql*-server, where the user must enable >> security.jail.sysvipc_allowed. I am sure this feature could expand to= >> other cases I have not considered yet, as well. >=20 > I do not think this is good idea. The machine or environment where > the port is built sometimes (or, in my setups, quite often) is not > the same as where it is run. Your proposal gives a tool to tightly > tie the ports to build environments, that is detrimental for some > setups, and also diminish the value of packaging. IMHO. Hi Kostik, Thank you for the comments. I had neglected that some package building environments are jails with the intent to install the packages on physical hardware or other non-jailed environment, so this change would break those environments. I had only tested the patches in a tinderbox environment. One thing I can think of off-hand to fix this in that case is setting a local environment variable to disable a check for security.jail.jailed. Would this be an ok solution for those cases? If not, I happily agree that this change should not be made then. I have an updated patch to bsd.port.mk that looks for a local environment variable, PKGJAIL - if it is set, then JAILED is unset. Would this be acceptable? Regards, Glen --=20 Glen Barber | gjb@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Documentation Project --------------020809040101020209070607 Content-Type: text/plain; name="0-Mk-bsd.port.mk.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0-Mk-bsd.port.mk.txt" --- bsd.port.mk.orig 2011-08-12 12:39:23.000000000 -0400 +++ bsd.port.mk 2011-08-20 08:07:12.656834897 -0400 @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ # "FreeBSD," "NetBSD," or "OpenBSD" as appropriate. # OSREL - The release version (numeric) of the operating system. # OSVERSION - The value of __FreeBSD_version. +# JAILED - The system is a FreeBSD jail. # # This is the beginning of the list of all variables that need to be # defined in a port, listed in order that they should be included @@ -1196,6 +1197,15 @@ .endif .endif =20 +# Check if the system is a jail +.if !defined(JAILED) +. if !defined(PKGJAIL) +JAILED!=3D ${SYSCTL} -n security.jail.jailed +. else +JAILED=3D +. endif +.endif + MASTERDIR?=3D ${.CURDIR} =20 .if ${MASTERDIR} !=3D ${.CURDIR} --------------020809040101020209070607-- --------------enigE4289E3EDB6EC491716708FF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOT6WQAAoJEFJPDDeguUajjssH+wQRd3a4tsh8DSSQ1zvUInKA zU3vfQv2rrUs80NGqZDvXfbrg05CS1g8/K3QmqUEHSv2MERUAuiZeGFgEFTUwShM B2GpJuUFn5C9epmDYBcxEkBdOTydoWFTYPod4N96pt/bVMp52n63a+ALG7N7XUh+ KPdVC48JI7OX0OW/eb4yUa/b/qm1eaQl6t7fBrdsQjBvhTd9NKHekS9uPfEn5aKN KGD8CfVh9FOio5nPuFFfHu7pW9rcoYxPAQP5phYAcIkVkY6yueHq1uZ0DBezZl2v O6QTHX2ngL9xVcJjsDqW0qZdLY40GfatoF326scwe+qw7hHYTOIEIMSQVqWRMVE= =4OZw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE4289E3EDB6EC491716708FF-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 20 12:44:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488761065672; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:44:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from mail.zoral.com.ua (mx0.zoral.com.ua [91.193.166.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06438FC0A; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by mail.zoral.com.ua (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p7KCiicE051548 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:44:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7KCihqp096826; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:44:43 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p7KCihr6096825; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:44:43 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:44:43 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov To: Glen Barber Message-ID: <20110820124443.GJ17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <4E4F95FD.907@FreeBSD.org> <20110820115203.GH17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4E4FA589.7070303@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KjXfDXQkNfDg3NwV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E4FA589.7070303@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Request for Comments] Adding a JAILED meta-variable to bsd.port.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:44:48 -0000 --KjXfDXQkNfDg3NwV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 08:16:09AM -0400, Glen Barber wrote: > On 8/20/11 7:52 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 07:09:49AM -0400, Glen Barber wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I would like to propose a change to bsd.port.mk which, similarly to > >> obtaining the OSVERSION, checks if the system on which a port is being > >> built is a jailed environment. > >> > >> This change can allow port maintainers to mark ports that do not run in > >> jailed environments as IGNORE, or adjust PKG_MESSAGE to inform the user > >> of special conditions or changes that will be needed to run a port from > >> within a jail. One particular example of the latter is > >> databases/postgresql*-server, where the user must enable > >> security.jail.sysvipc_allowed. I am sure this feature could expand to > >> other cases I have not considered yet, as well. > >=20 > > I do not think this is good idea. The machine or environment where > > the port is built sometimes (or, in my setups, quite often) is not > > the same as where it is run. Your proposal gives a tool to tightly > > tie the ports to build environments, that is detrimental for some > > setups, and also diminish the value of packaging. IMHO. >=20 > Hi Kostik, >=20 > Thank you for the comments. >=20 > I had neglected that some package building environments are jails with > the intent to install the packages on physical hardware or other > non-jailed environment, so this change would break those environments. > I had only tested the patches in a tinderbox environment. >=20 > One thing I can think of off-hand to fix this in that case is setting a > local environment variable to disable a check for security.jail.jailed. > Would this be an ok solution for those cases? If not, I happily agree > that this change should not be made then. >=20 > I have an updated patch to bsd.port.mk that looks for a local > environment variable, PKGJAIL - if it is set, then JAILED is unset. > Would this be acceptable? The change would require user to do a configuration for a thing that previously just worked. What is the point ? Right solution for the ports you provided as examples in your original mail, IMO, is to check and provide a diagnostic at runtime. In fact, I do not see a need in any special diagnostic, e.g. the lack of /dev/pf or lack of permissions to open /dev/pf is enough to refuse to work for program that depends on ability to modify pf configuration. Also, if pf(4) is implemented properly, then jails _can_ modify filter rules if configured so by administrator. Similarly, postgres just work in a properly configured jail. >=20 > Regards, >=20 > Glen >=20 > --=20 > Glen Barber | gjb@FreeBSD.org > FreeBSD Documentation Project > --- bsd.port.mk.orig 2011-08-12 12:39:23.000000000 -0400 > +++ bsd.port.mk 2011-08-20 08:07:12.656834897 -0400 > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ > # "FreeBSD," "NetBSD," or "OpenBSD" as appropriate. > # OSREL - The release version (numeric) of the operating system. > # OSVERSION - The value of __FreeBSD_version. > +# JAILED - The system is a FreeBSD jail. > # > # This is the beginning of the list of all variables that need to be > # defined in a port, listed in order that they should be included > @@ -1196,6 +1197,15 @@ > .endif > .endif > =20 > +# Check if the system is a jail > +.if !defined(JAILED) > +. if !defined(PKGJAIL) > +JAILED!=3D ${SYSCTL} -n security.jail.jailed > +. else > +JAILED=3D > +. endif > +.endif > + > MASTERDIR?=3D ${.CURDIR} > =20 > .if ${MASTERDIR} !=3D ${.CURDIR} --KjXfDXQkNfDg3NwV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk5PrDoACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4iqwwCgp46soM3c/ObeFTnUcq0Mf/z/ UhsAn1lvmh+joz/qYK5r6LGsKeMyWsQG =wD1b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KjXfDXQkNfDg3NwV-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 20 13:43:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70481065672 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:43:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [199.48.134.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 770478FC1A for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86254 invoked by uid 0); 20 Aug 2011 09:43:48 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO schism.local) (gjb@76.124.49.145) by 0 with SMTP; 20 Aug 2011 09:43:48 -0400 Message-ID: <4E4FBA13.4050009@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 09:43:47 -0400 From: Glen Barber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kostik Belousov References: <4E4F95FD.907@FreeBSD.org> <20110820115203.GH17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4E4FA589.7070303@FreeBSD.org> <20110820124443.GJ17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20110820124443.GJ17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Request for Comments] Adding a JAILED meta-variable to bsd.port.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:43:49 -0000 On 8/20/11 8:44 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: >> One thing I can think of off-hand to fix this in that case is setting a >> local environment variable to disable a check for security.jail.jailed. >> Would this be an ok solution for those cases? If not, I happily agree >> that this change should not be made then. >> >> I have an updated patch to bsd.port.mk that looks for a local >> environment variable, PKGJAIL - if it is set, then JAILED is unset. >> Would this be acceptable? > The change would require user to do a configuration for a thing that > previously just worked. What is the point ? > I suppose the specific problem I am trying to solve is a case where a user builds a port within a jail with the expectation that the port will in fact run within the jail with little or no changes. Perhaps security/sshguard-pf and databases/postgresql*-server are not the most ideal examples of where this would be relevant. I agree that a configuration change for something that worked before is not the best solution. So, I retract this change proposal. Again, thank you for the feedback and pointing out that this would have had negative impact on those using jails for package building. Regards, Glen -- Glen Barber | gjb@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Documentation Project From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 20 18:04:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94EC410656D4; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:04:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@e-e.com) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1848FC18; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:04:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F12B7005B5; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:46:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=e-e.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :user-agent:from:from:subject:subject:date:date:references :in-reply-to:message-id:received:received:received; s=ee; t= 1313862374; x=1315676774; bh=5xIFEVrlMvuRWvIBy9Jh+2MFX9iq87qx/kX GPT8wzZ4=; b=X7x60WWj/6a5C4Y9RBs1lJe6EeIsdvEA9lCZTpWSqCBdYe6iJzb 1ISGoeZ8uqWMCVhccamtiq+pkZ27wEP/xYSXFn8P01bsxQlWw6OYLX0I0qZuo6pH 6twtqY+Q8WPzG0X7+I4g5X+Gban6ontZgAK/Ah+GmHUsGRYoQR5B+yD8= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j-d96FTTsAuj; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:46:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29E5700321; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:46:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 63.201.14.88 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhelfman) by mail.experts-exchange.com with HTTP; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:46:14 -0700 Message-ID: <91b826baee57a450a519fee1c7032a5c.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> In-Reply-To: <4E4FBA13.4050009@FreeBSD.org> References: <4E4F95FD.907@FreeBSD.org> <20110820115203.GH17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4E4FA589.7070303@FreeBSD.org> <20110820124443.GJ17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4E4FBA13.4050009@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:46:14 -0700 From: "Jason Helfman" To: "Glen Barber" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Kostik Belousov , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Request for Comments] Adding a JAILED meta-variable to bsd.port.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:04:45 -0000 > On 8/20/11 8:44 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: >>> One thing I can think of off-hand to fix this in that case is setting a >>> local environment variable to disable a check for security.jail.jailed. >>> Would this be an ok solution for those cases? If not, I happily agree >>> that this change should not be made then. >>> >>> I have an updated patch to bsd.port.mk that looks for a local >>> environment variable, PKGJAIL - if it is set, then JAILED is unset. >>> Would this be acceptable? >> The change would require user to do a configuration for a thing that >> previously just worked. What is the point ? >> > > I suppose the specific problem I am trying to solve is a case where a > user builds a port within a jail with the expectation that the port will > in fact run within the jail with little or no changes. Perhaps > security/sshguard-pf and databases/postgresql*-server are not the most > ideal examples of where this would be relevant. > > I agree that a configuration change for something that worked before is > not the best solution. So, I retract this change proposal. > > Again, thank you for the feedback and pointing out that this would have > had negative impact on those using jails for package building. > > Regards, > > Glen > I, myself, have not installed or built enough packages in jails to find this issue, however I am using tinderbox for maintaining my ports, submitting ports, or patches, as well as maintaining a local ports tree. In doing this, and maintaining our operational environment, I am finding may conditions where you may want to do one thing or another, and the possibilities I have found can be endless, so it could be argued to not introduce global functionality for the X number of ports/packages that need it, however to code the port to be aware of these conditions in the packaging scripts. For example, you could test for values of sysctl, or another condition. Based on the result, perform X action. Although, I haven't done this specifically for a jail, I don't see why the same practice couldn't be exercised. These, I believe, can all be take taken advantage of in subsequent pkg-* files. Just a thought. Thanks, Jason From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 20 18:18:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD51106564A for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:18:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AA38FC13 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:18:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iye7 with SMTP id 7so14317941iye.17 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:18:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0WfqY26ulyquUEt7sgBDsFayPSqRgAOpV3qsa7CHvug=; b=HRPVpJZXiIuwGvpQNZLKuWIY4apCEAT//Nrzy0QMk/M20l+NAPg81an2mpkzrPft6x 4YXxm/k/9fX5rV887d9RPAl02zVH4mFU9F4h1wXPq/c0TMwDd53ddF1LMJXRK7hSaa8c 42ARBp/NxlbqD0dhC34DcUoMX7AcBbA3OjBoM= Received: by 10.42.79.206 with SMTP id s14mr798149ick.348.1313864325086; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:18:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.182.77 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:18:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <91b826baee57a450a519fee1c7032a5c.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> References: <4E4F95FD.907@FreeBSD.org> <20110820115203.GH17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4E4FA589.7070303@FreeBSD.org> <20110820124443.GJ17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4E4FBA13.4050009@FreeBSD.org> <91b826baee57a450a519fee1c7032a5c.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 19:18:15 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: lkmHZg_yXD4nnfMU8gYRIlT7dbU Message-ID: To: Jason Helfman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Kostik Belousov , Glen Barber , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Request for Comments] Adding a JAILED meta-variable to bsd.port.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:18:46 -0000 On 20 August 2011 18:46, Jason Helfman wrote: >> On 8/20/11 8:44 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: >>>> One thing I can think of off-hand to fix this in that case is setting = a >>>> local environment variable to disable a check for security.jail.jailed= . >>>> =A0Would this be an ok solution for those cases? =A0If not, I happily = agree >>>> that this change should not be made then. >>>> >>>> I have an updated patch to bsd.port.mk that looks for a local >>>> environment variable, PKGJAIL - if it is set, then JAILED is unset. >>>> Would this be acceptable? >>> The change would require user to do a configuration for a thing that >>> previously just worked. What is the point ? >>> >> >> I suppose the specific problem I am trying to solve is a case where a >> user builds a port within a jail with the expectation that the port will >> in fact run within the jail with little or no changes. =A0Perhaps >> security/sshguard-pf and databases/postgresql*-server are not the most >> ideal examples of where this would be relevant. >> >> I agree that a configuration change for something that worked before is >> not the best solution. =A0So, I retract this change proposal. >> >> Again, thank you for the feedback and pointing out that this would have >> had negative impact on those using jails for package building. >> >> Regards, >> >> Glen >> > I, myself, have not installed or built enough packages in jails to find > this issue, however I am using tinderbox for maintaining my ports, > submitting ports, or patches, as well as maintaining a local ports tree. > > In doing this, and maintaining our operational environment, I am finding > may conditions where you may want to do one thing or another, and the > possibilities I have found can be endless, so it could be argued to not > introduce global functionality for the X number of ports/packages that > need it, however to code the port to be aware of these conditions in the > packaging scripts. > > For example, you could test for values of sysctl, or another condition. > Based on the result, perform X action. Although, I haven't done this > specifically for a jail, I don't see why the same practice couldn't be > exercised. > > These, I believe, can all be take taken advantage of in subsequent pkg-* > files. > Hm, not a fan of getting output of sysctl for many ports -- that'd take forever in INDEX generation for example. Perhaps we could just introduce a JAILED variable and leave it at that? Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 20 18:39:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16ADE1065680 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:39:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5498FC13 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:39:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iye7 with SMTP id 7so14364580iye.17 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:39:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MFUrWk5AX/94tjBdQD9IFPGHqysG3cjYiFfzl5CtmVc=; b=jjJtLrS5/APKJ6VX22A9KdFBwes1/HqvgUMxMYykb0aMihJmjxXVerwfb9bwiH37fK UYyHIu4XtvJY0qBqR3n6vK0lYNsLusPurw7IbkBSPkeg1wzw6It4pX5V+NipDTeBmsvp m7ZH/0t1XuGa5/+zYCV7NsOudOvEMdUu5WvA0= Received: by 10.231.4.3 with SMTP id 3mr1671458ibp.72.1313865547111; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:39:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.182.77 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:38:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Rees Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 19:38:37 +0100 Message-ID: To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Which programs actually use INDEX? [formerly Extra fields in INDEX] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:39:08 -0000 On 19 August 2011 15:32, Chris Rees wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm having a look at modifying INDEX to have a field at the end (to > cause minimum breakage), but I've discovered that in a few ports there > (6630 out of 22731) appears to be extra 'stuff' in fields past field > 10 (which is for the first WWW: line in pkg-descr). > Hi all again, After some kind and encouraging words from Mark I've had a look at Tools/make_index script. I've hacked in support for adding a LICENSE field to the end (patches will be sent to portmgr when properly tested), but I'm a bit concerned about the layout and field order in INDEX: pkgname|portdir|prefix|comment|descrfile|maintainer|categories| which seems fine, until we move onto the next fields: build-dep|run-dep|WWW|extract-dep|patch-dep|fetch-dep[|license] Clearly the extract-dep etc were added later, as an afterthought, but the risk of tool breakage was too great. This makes the INDEXfile horribly unintuitive to read and parse, and I'd really like to look at at least simplifying it or tidying it up (as well as checking edge cases where it's actually making bad assumptions [re pkg_version]). If anyone thinks that their ${FAVOURITE_TOOL} parses, depends on or even looks at INDEX then please either email me or add it to the list at [1]. Thanks, Chris [1] http://wiki.freebsd.org/Index --=20 Chris Rees =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| FreeBSD Developer crees@FreeBSD.org =A0 | http://people.freebsd.org/~crees From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 20 22:34:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD7C1065670; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 22:34:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from geo.liaskos@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A58D8FC0C; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 22:34:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwc9 with SMTP id 9so3314424qwc.13 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:34:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=omg42hrHZa7aO/ndp9W8Bpl2dHJ5MRoYGroT/ACsUQc=; b=Y+2dnOiUDsB+iu1iq6e3cyrw77WPh5KsjnsPT30r9zjQD/pIcpE8s48RAM5r2ZJPvt NxZqxYz8Uv7dZ7Zj6sTJ2gb0XMFHu8g/aL3SicOy+O4tOxAJx3z1sJe92y8aElsDW9Id J2lRpLPrX2kl9p9jSXiJ1Arthpv/M7W+4DXb4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.43.146 with SMTP id w18mr405533qce.277.1313879657457; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:34:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.215.77 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:34:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 01:34:17 +0300 Message-ID: From: George Liaskos To: Patrick Ian Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, chromium@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: chromium-13.0.782.112 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 22:34:18 -0000 On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Patrick Ian wrote: > Hey, > > I would like to use the chromedriver target from the chromium port. > However, I do not know how to add that target to my local ports > chromium configuration. How do I make the chromedriver target? > > -- > -Patrick Ranspach- Hello, Do a make patch in the port's directory, set GYP_DEFINES* and then you can cd into work/chromium-version directory and play with gmake target -jx. I believe that the makefiles are created automatically if they don't exist but if you have problems run the following : python ./build/gyp_chromium chrome/chrome.gyp --depth . I haven't heard of chromedriver before but please report your findings back so we can work on a port option. * setenv GYP_DEFINES "use_system_libxml=1 use_system_ffmpeg=0 use_system_yasm=1 python_ver=2.7 ffmpeg_branding=Chrome use_gconf=1 use_system_vpx=1 disable_nacl=1 use_ibus=0 linux_use_heapchecker=1 linux_link_gsettings=1 linux_link_gnome_keyring=1 use_gnome_keyring=1" Regards, George