From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 13 01:26:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01128106566B; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:26:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C260D14E9D6; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4EBF1CBE.7080907@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 17:26:22 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111110 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bernhard_Fr=F6hlich?= References: <4EBE2673.2010209@FreeBSD.org> <1321085020.6227.11.camel@Nokia-N900-42-11> In-Reply-To: <1321085020.6227.11.camel@Nokia-N900-42-11> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: vbox@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod fails on HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:26:23 -0000 On 11/12/2011 00:03, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: > look for the patch in ports/162186 Thanks. I found the patch, but if I download it and turn it into patch-foo and try to build the port, all hunks fail to apply. Normally I'd just apply by hand and regenerate, but it's a big patch. Has anyone produced a working version? Doug -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 13 09:13:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2F6106564A; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 09:13:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from decke@FreeBSD.org) Received: from groupware.itac.at (groupware.itac.at [91.205.172.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F3C8FC08; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 09:13:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.bluelife.at (93.104.210.95) by groupware.itac.at (Axigen) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 096705; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:13:45 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:13:45 +0100 From: Bernhard Froehlich To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: <4EBF1CBE.7080907@FreeBSD.org> References: <4EBE2673.2010209@FreeBSD.org> <1321085020.6227.11.camel@Nokia-N900-42-11> <4EBF1CBE.7080907@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: X-Sender: decke@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.6 X-AxigenSpam-Level: 1 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B020C.4EBF8A48.0085,ss=1,fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Cc: vbox@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod fails on HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 09:13:46 -0000 On 13.11.2011 02:26, Doug Barton wrote: > On 11/12/2011 00:03, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: >> look for the patch in ports/162186 > > Thanks. I found the patch, but if I download it and turn it into > patch-foo and try to build the port, all hunks fail to apply. > Normally > I'd just apply by hand and regenerate, but it's a big patch. Has > anyone > produced a working version? That's because of the windows line endings. Don't know where they came from but this patch applies fine now for 4.0.12 and 4.1.4. http://home.bluelife.at/patches/patch-cdev-fixes.diff -- Bernhard Froehlich http://www.bluelife.at/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 13 07:34:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC6D106566B; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 07:34:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61BC08FC16; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 07:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwg14 with SMTP id 14so4999145wwg.31 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:34:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=LqE44ioQWkdkb2qZ3rkrY/sx/NFLs+xjdzZ3/Z78wBk=; b=uRfBJ52aqfBZMKTQjNXnZrUm38FVfz4Kr45q94/0UN2e1Aoed8OjyhFM/4hdcgJZi5 H/zzZcPWAdXziCf/iG7G0E+0BBjfXOTrJ4JcVnijPOkVs7RkojsCvv76fwIlWllTvWis OJjiVDT//v4NMf1qLAcXuLFZhEmm4zETqyt3Y= Received: by 10.216.137.42 with SMTP id x42mr414605wei.56.1321169672203; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:34:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.21.133 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:34:01 -0800 (PST) From: Eitan Adler Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 02:34:01 -0500 Message-ID: To: amdmi3@freebsd.org, kuriyama@freebsd.org, llwang@infor.org, miwi@freebsd.org, nivit@freebsd.org, perl@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, renchap@cocoa-x.com, sklauder@trimind.de, trasz@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:08:32 +0000 Cc: Subject: Small typos in COMMENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 07:34:34 -0000 Hi, The following ports have a small typo in the COMMENT line. Can you please commit the change below or permit me to commit this patch? Index: iso12083/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/textproc/iso12083/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.14 Makefile --- iso12083/Makefile 7 Jul 2003 11:51:38 -0000 1.14 +++ iso12083/Makefile 13 Nov 2011 07:29:32 -0000 @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ EXTRACT_ONLY= # empty MAINTAINER= kuriyama@FreeBSD.org -COMMENT= SGML DTDs from the The Electronic Publishing Special Interest Group +COMMENT= SGML DTDs from The Electronic Publishing Special Interest Group RUN_DEPENDS= ${XMLCATMGR}:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/xmlcatmgr Index: jpilot-picsnvideos/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/palm/jpilot-picsnvideos/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.4 Makefile --- jpilot-picsnvideos/Makefile 23 Sep 2011 22:24:56 -0000 1.4 +++ jpilot-picsnvideos/Makefile 13 Nov 2011 07:29:32 -0000 @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ PKGNAMEPREFIX= jpilot- MAINTAINER= sklauder@trimind.de -COMMENT= JPilot plugin to to download photos and videos +COMMENT= JPilot plugin to download photos and videos RUN_DEPENDS= jpilot:${PORTSDIR}/palm/jpilot BUILD_DEPENDS= jpilot:${PORTSDIR}/palm/jpilot Index: noegnud-littlehack/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/games/noegnud-littlehack/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -r1.16 Makefile --- noegnud-littlehack/Makefile 28 Mar 2010 06:35:23 -0000 1.16 +++ noegnud-littlehack/Makefile 13 Nov 2011 07:29:32 -0000 @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ EXTRACT_ONLY= ${DISTNAME}_linux_src-minimal${EXTRACT_SUFX} MAINTAINER= llwang@infor.org -COMMENT= The noeGNUd UI for the the LittleHack variation of Nethack +COMMENT= The noeGNUd UI for the LittleHack variation of Nethack RUN_DEPENDS= ${LOCALBASE}/share/${NOEGNUDVERSION}/data/gui:${PORTSDIR}/games/noegnud-data Index: p5-DBICx-Deploy/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/databases/p5-DBICx-Deploy/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.6 Makefile --- p5-DBICx-Deploy/Makefile 24 Sep 2011 22:02:35 -0000 1.6 +++ p5-DBICx-Deploy/Makefile 13 Nov 2011 07:29:32 -0000 @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ PKGNAMEPREFIX= p5- MAINTAINER= miwi@FreeBSD.org -COMMENT= Perl 5 module to deploy a a DBIx::Class schema +COMMENT= Perl 5 module to deploy a DBIx::Class schema BUILD_DEPENDS= p5-DBIx-Class>=0.07003:${PORTSDIR}/databases/p5-DBIx-Class \ p5-SQL-Translator>=0:${PORTSDIR}/databases/p5-SQL-Translator \ Index: p5-Rose-DBx-Object-MoreHelpers/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/databases/p5-Rose-DBx-Object-MoreHelpers/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.5 Makefile --- p5-Rose-DBx-Object-MoreHelpers/Makefile 24 Sep 2010 00:44:18 -0000 1.5 +++ p5-Rose-DBx-Object-MoreHelpers/Makefile 13 Nov 2011 07:29:32 -0000 @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ PKGNAMEPREFIX= p5- MAINTAINER= miwi@FreeBSD.org -COMMENT= Perl 5 module to deploy a a DBIx::Class schema +COMMENT= Perl 5 module to deploy a DBIx::Class schema RUN_DEPENDS= p5-Rose-DB-Object>=0.7730,1:${PORTSDIR}/databases/p5-Rose-DB-Object \ p5-Data-Dump>=1.06:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-Data-Dump Index: py-nevow/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/www/py-nevow/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -r1.17 Makefile --- py-nevow/Makefile 26 Jul 2011 19:59:58 -0000 1.17 +++ py-nevow/Makefile 13 Nov 2011 07:29:32 -0000 @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ EXTRACT_SUFX= .tar.gz?format=raw MAINTAINER= nivit@FreeBSD.org -COMMENT= A web application templating system, based on the the Twisted Woven +COMMENT= A web application templating system, based on the Twisted Woven BROKEN= does not build -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 13 14:49:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9BB106564A; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 14:49:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6380D8FC0A; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 14:49:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [93.104.92.191] (helo=localhost.my.domain) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RPbNM-0005e4-Kd; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:49:40 +0100 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pADEneeh007514; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:49:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id pADEndMB007513; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:49:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:49:39 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: Chris Rees Message-ID: <20111113144939.GA7447@tinyCurrent> References: <20111112151001.GA3289@tinyCurrent> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 93.104.92.191 Cc: kwm@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libgee-0.6.2.1: error in pkg-plist X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 14:49:44 -0000 El día Saturday, November 12, 2011 a las 03:35:25PM +0000, Chris Rees escribió: > This isn't a plist problem; it's an > autotools-doesn't-understand-FreeBSD-10 problem. > > On previous versions it works fine; > > [crees@pegasus]~/libgee% grep '^pkgconfigdir' work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile > pkgconfigdir = $(prefix)/libdata/pkgconfig > [crees@pegasus]~/libgee% Seems so. If you do it step-by-step and check the Makefile for it it looks like this: caracas# make clean ===> Cleaning for libgee-0.6.2.1 caracas# make extract ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE ===> Extracting for libgee-0.6.2.1 => SHA256 Checksum OK for libgee-0.6.2.1.tar.xz. caracas# grep '^pkgconfigdir' work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile* work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile.am:pkgconfigdir = $(libdir)/pkgconfig work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile.in:pkgconfigdir = $(libdir)/pkgconfig caracas# make configure ... caracas# grep '^pkgconfigdir' work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile* work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile:pkgconfigdir = $(prefix)/libdata/pkgconfig work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile.am:pkgconfigdir = $(libdir)/pkgconfig work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile.in:pkgconfigdir = $(prefix)/libdata/pkgconfig work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile.in.bak:pkgconfigdir = $(libdir)/pkgconfig caracas# make ... caracas# grep '^pkgconfigdir' work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile* work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile:pkgconfigdir = $(libdir)/pkgconfig work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile.am:pkgconfigdir = $(libdir)/pkgconfig work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile.in:pkgconfigdir = $(libdir)/pkgconfig work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile.in.bak:pkgconfigdir = $(libdir)/pkgconfig as you see the 'make' changes the Makefile again produced by 'make configure', why? All the above is with UNAME_r set to 9.0-CURRENT; if you set in addition OSVERSION to 9.0, all is fine; matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 13 16:37:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B48106566B; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 16:37:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kwm@rainbow-runner.nl) Received: from fep17.mx.upcmail.net (fep17.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D94A8FC08; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 16:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge04.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.239]) by viefep17-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.02.02 201-2260-120-106-20100312) with ESMTP id <20111113163733.RVNV1911.viefep17-int.chello.at@edge04.upcmail.net>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:37:33 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([178.84.137.57]) by edge04.upcmail.net with edge id wgdY1h00n1EUzH604gdZj1; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:37:33 +0100 X-SourceIP: 178.84.137.57 Message-ID: <4EBFF245.9010909@rainbow-runner.nl> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:37:25 +0100 From: Koop Mast User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthias Apitz References: <20111112151001.GA3289@tinyCurrent> <20111113144939.GA7447@tinyCurrent> In-Reply-To: <20111113144939.GA7447@tinyCurrent> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 111113-1, 13-11-2011), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=1spcbIYDqsXqpWho1FqXt/RH1HhH/N0x2ckrrSfPMwM= c=1 sm=0 a=yAP4_T4JbDAA:10 a=eIhxMilvRf8A:10 a=QGpF-o_vkpAA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=uI32pRSmiIZWGj7n3GsA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Cc: Chris Rees , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libgee-0.6.2.1: error in pkg-plist X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 16:37:36 -0000 On 13-11-2011 15:49, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Saturday, November 12, 2011 a las 03:35:25PM +0000, Chris Rees escribió: > >> This isn't a plist problem; it's an >> autotools-doesn't-understand-FreeBSD-10 problem. >> >> On previous versions it works fine; >> >> [crees@pegasus]~/libgee% grep '^pkgconfigdir' work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile >> pkgconfigdir = $(prefix)/libdata/pkgconfig >> [crees@pegasus]~/libgee% > Seems so. If you do it step-by-step and check the Makefile for it it > looks like this: > > caracas# make clean > ===> Cleaning for libgee-0.6.2.1 > > caracas# make extract > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > ===> Extracting for libgee-0.6.2.1 > => SHA256 Checksum OK for libgee-0.6.2.1.tar.xz. > caracas# grep '^pkgconfigdir' work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile* > work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile.am:pkgconfigdir = $(libdir)/pkgconfig > work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile.in:pkgconfigdir = $(libdir)/pkgconfig > > caracas# make configure > ... > caracas# grep '^pkgconfigdir' work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile* > work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile:pkgconfigdir = $(prefix)/libdata/pkgconfig > work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile.am:pkgconfigdir = $(libdir)/pkgconfig > work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile.in:pkgconfigdir = > $(prefix)/libdata/pkgconfig > work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile.in.bak:pkgconfigdir = $(libdir)/pkgconfig > > caracas# make > ... > caracas# grep '^pkgconfigdir' work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile* > work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile:pkgconfigdir = $(libdir)/pkgconfig > work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile.am:pkgconfigdir = $(libdir)/pkgconfig > work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile.in:pkgconfigdir = $(libdir)/pkgconfig > work/libgee-0.6.2.1/Makefile.in.bak:pkgconfigdir = $(libdir)/pkgconfig > > as you see the 'make' changes the Makefile again produced by 'make > configure', why? All the above is with UNAME_r set to 9.0-CURRENT; > > if you set in addition OSVERSION to 9.0, all is fine; > > matthias This should be fixed by a commit done on wednesday. Can you update your ports tree and try again? -Koop From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 13 20:04:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6991D106566C for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:04:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@acm.org) Received: from mail30.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail30.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.133.193]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F069A8FC0A for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (c220-239-116-103.belrs4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.116.103]) by mail30.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id pADK4YZo029015 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:04:36 +1100 X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (localhost.vk2pj.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pADK4YaE089415; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:04:34 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.5/8.14.4/Submit) id pADK4Vte089414; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:04:31 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:04:31 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: Stanislav Sedov Message-ID: <20111113200431.GA89348@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <20111109124325.17efc0d1.stas@deglitch.com> <20111109222435.GD92221@azathoth.lan> <20111110110637.GA3514@hades.panopticon> <4EBCC587.10701@FreeBSD.org> <20111111100708.GA24126@hades.panopticon> <20111111124012.3ec48cb3.stas@deglitch.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111111124012.3ec48cb3.stas@deglitch.com> X-PGP-Key: http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Dmitry Marakasov Subject: Re: Recent ports removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:04:59 -0000 --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2011-Nov-11 12:40:12 -0800, Stanislav Sedov wrote: >Because portmgr@ is using it? There're numerous cases when unmaintained, = buggy, >vulnerable and plainly dangerous stuff stays in tree because someone in po= rtmgr >gang likes it when other applications not used by them being removed witho= ut >prior discussion notice. Because your opinion doesn't matter. Neither is= mine. I am getting heartily tired of your continuous tirade against the portmgr@ community. Please provide evidence to backup your accusations or retract them. As for the removal of obsolete ports - it has been made perfectly clear on many occasions that a MAINTAINER of ports@ means that port is _not_ maintained. If it's a port you use, feel free to take over maintainership. Otherwise that port is subject to removal if any problems with it crop up. --=20 Peter Jeremy --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk7AIs8ACgkQ/opHv/APuIc+mwCcDGJmhQgLPoeYl/bfP/IGNEyf 4MEAn2khGQFYP1LGHl/7ugaWO7FizC6G =COq2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 13 21:20:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A2F106566C; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 21:20:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4CEF1532F3; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 21:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4EC0349D.9070307@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:20:29 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111110 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mikhail T." References: <20111109124325.17efc0d1.stas@deglitch.com> <20111109222435.GD92221@azathoth.lan> <20111110110637.GA3514@hades.panopticon> <4EBD9D25.7020406@FreeBSD.org> <4EC027D4.60808@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <4EC027D4.60808@aldan.algebra.com> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Baptiste Daroussin , Dmitry Marakasov Subject: Re: Recent ports removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 21:20:30 -0000 On 11/13/2011 12:25, Mikhail T. wrote: > You've gone from "small minority of other interested parties" to "no one > has made a peep" in a single e-mail! If this is the quality of the rest > of your reasoning, than you should not be surprised, that it has not > really resonated despite the "endless repetition"... You turned a comparison of the discussion of the concept of ports removal generally to the removal of individual ports and turned it into an ad hominem attack on the quality of *my* reasoning. This is an excellent example of why I, for one, don't bother replying substantively to your messages anymore. Doug -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 13 21:31:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB7B106564A; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 21:31:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F57F8FC0A; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 21:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iakl21 with SMTP id l21so7327635iak.13 for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:31:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gL1k/j55jy6fyISae7/hZ61g8/ViSkkLRs5QfgTkJQM=; b=H1eG7A23kqdCBJZRzfAoF1Mv5npCDjvRDeL2rdnY+xDAGXCWB8yyHtggcJo4GufCGz buLwf7h3HvSc0Z5gHn76bej0Oa+66UeV/NCgGGLmcUP/D7MeHzHTqbrzyaBL7D7iFVVC G5fd2L1Nd/C6tRZstUNaohdmTZmUstcn+BzKk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.67.211 with SMTP id s19mr5111234ibi.91.1321219901761; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:31:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.11.140 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:31:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.11.140 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:31:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EC0349D.9070307@FreeBSD.org> References: <20111109124325.17efc0d1.stas@deglitch.com> <20111109222435.GD92221@azathoth.lan> <20111110110637.GA3514@hades.panopticon> <4EBD9D25.7020406@FreeBSD.org> <4EC027D4.60808@aldan.algebra.com> <4EC0349D.9070307@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 21:31:41 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Doug Barton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, "Mikhail T." , Dmitry Marakasov , Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: Recent ports removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 21:31:43 -0000 On 13 Nov 2011 21:20, "Doug Barton" wrote: > > On 11/13/2011 12:25, Mikhail T. wrote: > > You've gone from "small minority of other interested parties" to "no one > > has made a peep" in a single e-mail! If this is the quality of the rest > > of your reasoning, than you should not be surprised, that it has not > > really resonated despite the "endless repetition"... > > You turned a comparison of the discussion of the concept of ports > removal generally to the removal of individual ports and turned it into > an ad hominem attack on the quality of *my* reasoning. This is an > excellent example of why I, for one, don't bother replying substantively > to your messages anymore. > > > Doug Oh my.... it's two months ago. Is it? Can we move on? Ports are deprecated and removed. Insecure/unmaintained ports are harmful. If you care, step up to maintain them. Seriously. Or stop complaining. Chris PS only replying to Doug because it's the latest email, not because I think he disagrees with me. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 13 20:54:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433EF1065678; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:54:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5AF28FC08; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2011 15:25:57 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.2.3-GA) with ESMTP id BKG89750; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:25:57 -0500 Received-SPF: None identity=pra; client-ip=209.6.61.133; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com"; x-sender="mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.6.61.133; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com"; x-sender="mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None identity=helo; client-ip=209.6.61.133; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com"; x-sender="postmaster@[192.168.1.8]"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-Auth-ID: anat Received: from 209-6-61-133.c3-0.sbo-ubr1.sbo.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO [192.168.1.8]) ([209.6.61.133]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2011 15:25:57 -0500 Message-ID: <4EC027D4.60808@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:25:56 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110926 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <20111109124325.17efc0d1.stas@deglitch.com> <20111109222435.GD92221@azathoth.lan> <20111110110637.GA3514@hades.panopticon> <4EBD9D25.7020406@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4EBD9D25.7020406@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 04:18:51 +0000 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Baptiste Daroussin , Dmitry Marakasov Subject: Re: Recent ports removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:54:46 -0000 On -10.01.-28163 14:59, Doug Barton wrote: > Yes, we realize that you, and a small minority of other interested > parties, have this belief in spite of endless repetition of the > reasoning, by the people who do the actual work to keep the ports tree > functional, as to why your desire to keep every port is not a workable > solution. I'm one of this "small minority" and can't recall hearing the actual "reasoning" repeated even once -- without every argument being soundly rebutted by myself and other "interested parties". The last discussion, that I can recall ended with an assurance, that the matter is being discussed by the portmgr@ and that the discussion's results will soon be delivered to the unwashed masses. If, indeed, the sound arguments exist, then, perhaps, they can be summarized on a web-page of some sort -- together with the attempts at rebuttal and the counter-rebuttals? There is clearly a vocal share of contributors that currently disagree with portmgr's line -- and our claim to represent a sizable portion of users is just as good as your claim, that we are nothing but a "small minority". Please, convince us so we can all go along with the consensus -- and relieve you from having to repeat your reasoning (whatever it is) monthly... Thanks! > However the fact that no one has made a peep about them is a pretty strong indication that they were simply dead > weight that we were carrying for no good reason. You've gone from "small minority of other interested parties" to "no one has made a peep" in a single e-mail! If this is the quality of the rest of your reasoning, than you should not be surprised, that it has not really resonated despite the "endless repetition"... -mi From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 03:52:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3651065670; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 03:52:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E8F8FC08; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 03:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2011 22:52:49 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.2.3-GA) with ESMTP id BKH21829; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:52:49 -0500 Received-SPF: None identity=pra; client-ip=209.6.61.133; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com"; x-sender="mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.6.61.133; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com"; x-sender="mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None identity=helo; client-ip=209.6.61.133; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com"; x-sender="postmaster@[192.168.1.8]"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-Auth-ID: anat Received: from 209-6-61-133.c3-0.sbo-ubr1.sbo.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO [192.168.1.8]) ([209.6.61.133]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2011 22:52:48 -0500 Message-ID: <4EC09090.6070305@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:52:48 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110926 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20111109124325.17efc0d1.stas@deglitch.com> <20111109222435.GD92221@azathoth.lan> <20111110110637.GA3514@hades.panopticon> <4EBD9D25.7020406@FreeBSD.org> <4EC027D4.60808@aldan.algebra.com> <4EC0349D.9070307@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4EC0349D.9070307@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 04:38:06 +0000 Cc: Chris Rees , Baptiste Daroussin , Doug Barton , Dmitry Marakasov Subject: Re: Recent ports removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 03:52:51 -0000 On 13.11.2011 16:20, Doug Barton wrote: > You turned a comparison of the discussion of the concept of ports > removal generally to the removal of individual ports and turned it into > an ad hominem attack on the quality of*my* reasoning. Huh? > This is an excellent example of why I, for one, don't bother replying substantively > to your messages anymore. And yet, you are going to have to... Because you are not doing your removals as an individual committer (if you were, your desire to remove a port could've been stopped by *my* desire to keep it). And as long as you imply having some sort of governing authority behind you (such as a portmgr hat -- permanent or temporary), you need to justify your actions to keep the consent of the governed. But I'm not asking you to reply to the uncivil, sarcastic, and otherwise flawed *me*. My proposal was for you and the rest of the "removers" to articulate your reasoning on a web-page. That would carry your message (calmly thought-through and edited) to all users and colleagues alike, including those too polite to question your actions publicly. Please, oblige. On 13.11.2011 16:31, Chris Rees wrote: > Oh my.... it's two months ago. Yes. And my recollection from back then is that portmgr was reviewing the issue (in the quiet of Olympus away from the noise of all the silly mortals) and was going to render their decision (eloquently and convincingly to all)... That has not happened, but the removals continue to this day... > Can we move on? Ports are deprecated and removed. > Insecure/unmaintained ports are harmful. No, we can not move on. It should, by now, be obvious to all, that there is no consensus on when a port should be removed. And yet, a fraction of the committers take it upon themselves to remove ports based on their own credentials -- much to the dissatisfaction of the opposing fraction. I fail to see, why or how the opinion of crees@ and dougb@ outweighs that of stas@ and mi@. To be sure, both factions have other members, but nobody conducted a vote -- and we don't even know, what such a vote would mean anyway. Yours, -mi From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 07:32:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB3E106566B for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:32:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D368FC13 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:32:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RPr21-0000md-Md for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:32:41 +0100 Received: from g224056152.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.224.56.152]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:32:41 +0100 Received: from rotkap by g224056152.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:32:41 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Heino Tiedemann Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:32:11 +0100 Organization: yes Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <4EBC0FBE.2090704@cassiba.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: g224056152.adsl.alicedsl.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix) X-Face: v6Lci{Mw=kwHf$`7C?L-U#BHn7O\wqF-1qg#Vk%}nUQv\i^mM/.p=wU+cr)yXf#Ob+foOOxW; ir"QI!|25wG3`ywF)yh~@V.kKtr.qp+v.R; w?c@ZzM#!'/7r_+)$NjMN:]qo-]`&z~KlP}|cERO'%s9":6\ZnN/O List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:32:45 -0000 Sam Cassiba wrote: > On 11/10/11 11:35, Heino Tiedemann wrote: >> Hi Folks, >> >> >> - misc/xfce4-weather-plugin (marked as IGNORE) >> >> Why? >> >> >> Heino >> >> > > The commit history reveals all: > > http://www.freshports.org/misc/xfce4-weather-plugin "the weather applet will need a new data provider, because that new feed won't be free." Well, what about the dataprovider who feeds the KDE wheather applet? Heino From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 11:06:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851C1106567B for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:06:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731558FC17 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:06:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAEB67OQ082743 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:06:07 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id pAEB66uS082741 for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:06:06 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:06:06 GMT Message-Id: <201111141106.pAEB66uS082741@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: FreeBSD ports list Cc: Subject: Current unassigned ports problem reports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:06:07 -0000 (Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- f ports/162559 regression in ospfd after upgrade net/quagga to 0.99.2 o ports/162556 Can't install editors/libreoffice. Again o ports/162526 Sigbus in minidlna port because read_random_bytes trea f ports/162518 www/shellinabox o ports/162516 New port: games/minecraft-client A block building game o ports/162515 New port: games/minecraft-server Server for the game M o ports/162511 [NEW PORT] net-im/imspector-devel devel version of ims f ports/162506 Tools/scripts/checknewver.sh: add missing closing quot f ports/162496 sysutils/zfs-periodic periodic script error f ports/162483 python -c "import rpm" crashes with a segfault o ports/162480 New port: net-mgmt/cacti-with-plugins Web-driven graph f ports/162447 net/isc-dhcp41-server: starting with rc-script fails f ports/162383 [PATCH] sysutils/smartmontools Remove cd* from the lis f ports/162378 x11/yakuake-kde4 doesn't honor WITHOUT_NLS f ports/162377 databases/mysql++3: portability fix for gcc-4.6 o ports/162375 net/openafs doesn't compile on 9-RC1 o ports/162349 build fix for audio/aureal-kmod o ports/162341 new port: devel/easypbi o ports/162340 Update: net-p2p/eiskaltdcpp-{lib,daemon,qt,gtk} o ports/162335 New port: net-p2p/solidcoin Alternative Bitcoin peer-t o ports/162313 print/foo2zfs: example devd rules o ports/162301 [maintainer-update] games/ioquake3-devel and slaves o ports/162297 [Maintainer] x11-toolkits/fltk2: update to snapshot r9 f ports/162281 [UPDATE] textproc/apache-solr: update to 3.4.0 f ports/162242 [patch] security/py-pycrypto: update to 2.4 o ports/162240 net/nss-pam-ldapd should allow openldap24-sasl-client f ports/162231 [PATCH] Update www/xxxterm to 1.8.0 f ports/162221 9.0-RC1 new problem building lang/spidermonkey f ports/162218 mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin: sa-learn can't parse mbox o f ports/162217 Broken translation because of typo in net-mgmt/mrtg o ports/162207 audio/cdparanoid: crash while building the port. f ports/162194 [UPDATE] www/py-gunicorn to 0.13.4 o ports/162177 mail/opendkim - make dependency to Sendmail optional f ports/162167 New port: sysutils/torque2 f ports/162148 can't build net-p2p/eiskaltdcpp-lib f ports/162107 audio/clementine-player does nor play OGG audio files o ports/162085 duplicate file name in open-motif-2.3.3 and tcl-8.5.10 f ports/162082 [patch] databases/mongodb: fix strip binaries o ports/162053 [NEW PORT] devel/php5-msgpack PHP extension for interf f ports/162052 [update][fix] devel/fb303 o ports/162045 print/ghostview 1.5_2 coredumps on certain files o ports/162041 [new port] print/harfbuzz: OpenType text shaping engin o ports/162039 update for lang/qore from 0.8.0 to 0.8.3 f ports/162026 Update www/davical to version 0.9.9.7 f ports/162025 devel/php-libawl upgrade to version 0.49 o ports/162017 [patch] lang/sbcl: mark BROKEN on freebsd 9/10 (THREAD o ports/162016 BSDPAN::ExtUtils::Packlist->get_dir_list can go into a f ports/162013 [patch update] sysutils/b43-fwcutter 012 -> 015 o ports/161989 OpenOCD port (devel/openocd) update 0.4.0 -> 0.5.0 o ports/161977 New port: sysutils/volman FreeBSD specific volume mana s ports/161965 Update Ports mail/assp to latest version o ports/161963 [MAINTAINER] net-p2p/py26-BitTornado: [SUMMARIZE CHANG f ports/161951 mail/dovecot2-antispam-plugin hangs fails when built w o ports/161938 New port www/pyLoad a fast, lightweight and full featu o ports/161932 net-mgmt/net-snmp reports bogus data in UCD-SNMP-MIB:: o ports/161922 [maintainer][patch] math/saga: cleanup unneeded helper o ports/161894 New port databases/datamodeler: Database modeling tool o ports/161867 Revised Port: www/web-traceroute f ports/161845 [update] [patch] multimedia/mplayer-skins Bring in ups f ports/161844 [PATCH] graphics/geos: update to 3.3.1 o ports/161814 [patch] security update www/linux-opera to 11.52 o ports/161800 [new ports] 2 new Pure bindings: math/pure-mpfr & deve o ports/161701 New port: games/chocolate-doom Doom port f ports/161694 sysutils/dvd+rw-tools: growisofs fails to close disc o ports/161690 New port: games/prboom-plus Port of ID Software's Doom o ports/161578 devel/strace is not working f ports/161569 [MAINTAINER] audio/libaacplus: aacplus.h has comma at o ports/161539 New port: audio/gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large amou f ports/161518 [patch] update/add devel/scons version 2.1.0 o ports/161502 [patch] lang/sbcl: allow bootstrapping on 10.0-CURRENT f ports/161470 [patch] www/squid31 unintentionally picks up libmd5 as o ports/161462 net-mgmt/zabbix-agent: Zabbix_agentd opens a lot of fi o ports/161455 multimedia/transcode should depend on ffmpeg o ports/161444 [PATCH] lang/sbcl: update to 1.0.52.0 o ports/161442 [MAINTAINER] devel/gps: Update to version 5.0.1 o ports/161440 [NEW PORT] devel/libk8055: Velleman K8055 USB experime f ports/161406 [PATCH] net-mgmt/netdisco: update to 1.1 o ports/161379 security/openssl compile error caused by abbreviated-r f ports/161299 science/paraview: CLANG: Linking CXX shared library . f ports/161271 [patch] x11/cl-clx: loading with clozure fails, dep-op o ports/161268 sysutils/fusefs-ntfs fails to mount ntfs "invalid argu f ports/161244 [PATCH] audio/libmikmod: fix failed patching o ports/161239 Graphics/pgplot fails to build w/gcc46 o ports/161231 [NEW PORT] www/sencha-touch: The First HTML5 Mobile We o ports/161226 security/fprint_demo: Updates to last git version o ports/161225 security/pam_fprint: Updates to the last git version o ports/161167 security/botan configure does not work with python 3.1 f ports/161139 restore sysutils/gpart o ports/161106 sysutils/openipmi is dropping core o ports/161103 graphics/rawtherapee fails to build f ports/161070 infinite loop for graphics/xfig on 9.0-CURRENT f ports/161005 graphics/geos: CLANG : for functional-style cast from f ports/160991 net/opennx : Unexpected termination of nxssh o ports/160969 [patch] sysutils/zfs-snapshot-mgmt: embed ruby version f ports/160927 lang/gauche: needs upgrade f ports/160870 www/mod_security port not updated o ports/160861 New port: security/racoon-tool Manage setkey and racoo o ports/160825 [MAINTAINER] www/MT: Perl modules introduced when usin o ports/160823 [NEW PORT] devel/pecl-amqp: AMQP API f ports/160821 audio/libmp3splt: Building WITHOUT_ID3 fails o ports/160817 Can not build mew port with zh_TW.Big5 as value of LC_ o ports/160714 [patch] misc/{py-,}xdelta3: update to 3.0.0 (stable re f ports/160667 [patch] audio/xmmix: fix WARNING pid 4826 (xmmix): ioc f ports/160626 [patch] www/py-rssdler: deprecate in favor of www/py-f o ports/160579 [PATCH] audio/firefly: portlint(1) fixes and more o ports/160566 [new port] mail/dbmail-devel: dbmail upgraded to versi f ports/160539 [PATCH] security/botan: update to 1.10.1 f ports/160511 [PATCH] make math/py-graphtool actually work o ports/160492 [patch] lang/ocaml: respect CC o ports/160366 New port: misc/xmonad-log-applet An applet that will d o ports/160323 [PATCH] japanese/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin. fix sa-update, o ports/160313 New port:databases/pg_reorg o ports/160273 [patch] Fix distfile sources for port net/AquaGatekeep o ports/160265 [NEW PORT] lang/pypy 1.6 o ports/160262 New port: net-mgmt/better-cacti-templates - better Cac f ports/160257 [patch] mail/ssmtp: pkg-message needs further descript f ports/160233 [patch][update] devel/pinba_engine Update to new revis f ports/160210 [update] devel/php5-pinba o ports/160208 [NEW PORT} print/py27-pdfcolorsplit - script to split o ports/160207 [NEW PORT] devel/php5-dav: The PHP WebDAV extension o ports/160178 [NEW PORT] www/vimprobable1 - webkit browser inspired o ports/160177 [NEW PORT] www/vimprobable2 - webkit browser inspired f ports/160033 [maintainer] update port devel/libffi o ports/160031 [PATCH] devel/yajl add yajl.pc f ports/160017 [new port] NeoRouter client & server o ports/160006 [new port] devel/premake4: cross-platform build script f ports/159976 new port: games/blackjack f ports/159951 [patch] www/woof to support Python 2.7 o ports/159894 [new port] databases/php52-rrdtool f ports/159874 [patch] sysutils/zfs-snapshot-mgmt: respect local time f ports/159821 [patch] www/squid31: dnsserver does not build f ports/159791 x11-fonts/terminus-font patch apply fails f ports/159728 sysutils/htop 0.9.0_1 is broken (does not show process o ports/159636 [patch] net/freevrrpd: RC script for freevrrpd that co o ports/159631 New port: sysutils/amount FreeBSD specific auto mount f ports/159619 net-mgmt/netams install cgi scripts without exec permi f ports/159607 Update port: graphic/mahotas Efficient Image Processin f ports/159516 [patch] Port comms/mlan3 update to 310r2 version f ports/159409 [PATCH] devel/py-boto: update to 2.0 o ports/159378 [NEW PORT] lang/php-plua: PLua is a PHP extension whic f ports/159313 sysutils/uhidd: uhidd-devd.conf.sample doesn't work f ports/159205 net-mgmt/zabbix-agent: No active checks on server: hos o ports/159187 [patch] sysutils/am-utils patch to add nolockd to nfs f ports/159177 sysutils/muse on 8.2-STABLE o ports/159121 net/freevrrpd: Make adv_int a runtime configurable opt f ports/159108 sysutils/fusefs-smbnetfs update to 0.5.3 o ports/159102 sysutils/fusefs-kmod: fusefs daemonizes before mount i o ports/159083 [NEW PORT] www/py27-django_compressor: Compresses link o ports/159003 devel/cross-gcc attempts to use $PRFIX/../../ranlib on o ports/159001 devel/cross-gcc: 4.5.2 libiberty fails on missing sys/ s ports/158983 [NEW PORT] devel/pecl-dtrace: PHP DTrace provider f ports/158968 Update port: lang/mosh version 0.2.7 f ports/158907 [PATCH] www/interchange: update to 5.6.3 f ports/158904 [PATCH] finance/openerp-web: update to 6.0.2 f ports/158898 [PATCH] www/libecap: update to 0.2.0 o ports/158878 [patch] textproc/dadadodo assumes long is 32 bits o ports/158781 New port: games/drcreep Platform Puzzle Game a ports/158744 [Maintainer] textproc/scim-kmfl-imengine: fix pkg-plis f ports/158703 New port: mail/mailutils o ports/158692 devel/cross-gcc: minor patch to enable arm-none-eabi s f ports/158533 [NEW PORT] devel/tiled: 2D game map editor o ports/158506 In multimedia/emotion leave only one backend enabled b o ports/157320 [NEW PORT] databases/pecl-pdo_user: PECL classes provi o ports/157301 [New port] net-mgmt/zbxlog: Syslog server receives mes f ports/157109 conflict between net/netpipes and sysutils/timelimit f ports/157107 conflict between mail/p5-Mail-SPF and mail/libspf2 f ports/157021 multimedia/mplayer: does not build with multimedia/lib o ports/156881 devel/valgrind: Fix build with newer gcc o ports/156834 New port: games/fairymax-devel latest version of games f ports/156747 multimedia/mplayer: fix 24-bits OSS + some improvement o ports/156472 [new port] devel/ocaml-react - OCaml library for react f ports/156376 [PATCH] graphics/optipng: update to 0.6.5 o ports/156362 New port: games/rftg Race for the Galaxy AI f ports/156252 New port: devel/radar Opensource tools to disasm, debu f ports/156171 port multimedia/mplayer patch-libao2-ao_oss.c is incor f ports/156143 New port: devel/arduino-mk: Build Arduino sketches fro f ports/156075 [new port] graphics/openfst: library for constructing, f ports/156034 print/lyx-devel spell checking with enchant does not w f ports/155941 mwserv library support is not included in nepenthes.co f ports/155898 Update port devel/libthai f ports/155697 ports-mgmt/pkg_replace doesn't want to replace java/op o ports/155593 lang/mpd .16.1 ignores embedded cue sheets in FLAC fil f ports/155538 new port devel/radlib radlib developer library. Event- o ports/155166 update deskutils/org-mode.el to 7.4 o ports/155157 devel/libdispatch don't build with clang on 8.2-RELEAS f ports/155115 devel/doxygen: dependancy loop o ports/154711 security/heimdal: kadmin: hdb_open: hdb_open failed in o ports/154682 net/iaxmodem: add rc script for running more than 1 ia f ports/154546 update port: games/gemrb to version 0.6.3 o ports/154502 xdm authorization failure when used with E17 window ma o ports/154401 New port: www/jetty7 - newer fork by Eclipse/Codehaus o ports/154352 [patch] multimedia/xmms: update using desktop and mime o ports/154217 New port: ports-mgmt/portsreinstall o ports/154031 New port: audio/shoutcast2: SHOUTcast Distributed Netw o ports/153810 [PATCH] Fix usb_interrupt_read() in devel/libusb for f o ports/153429 [patch] Fix explicite uses of unzip in ports o ports/153386 devel/valgrind does not build/include man pages o ports/153128 graphics/ocaml-lablgl fails to build o ports/152982 [patch] net/nss_ldap, ignore option nss_initgroups_ign f ports/152915 russian/xmms v. 1.2.11_12 don't see cdinfo and tag's i o ports/152899 devel/valgrind: unhandled syscall: 506 o ports/152236 [patch] x11/slim: Enable pam support, add hald and dbu s ports/152195 [PATCH] deskutils/pinot update to xapian-core 1.2.3 f ports/152192 [PATCH] databases/xapian-bindings update to 1.2.3 o ports/152191 [PATCH] databases/xapian-core update to 1.2.3 o ports/152118 New port: deskutils/linux-tahometer A worktime trackin o ports/151930 [PATCH] net-mgmt/netams links to libmysqlclient/libpq o ports/151747 new port: emulators/wine-fbsd64: request for (a variat o ports/151318 [repocopy][new port] x11-wm/stumpwm: rename to x11-wm/ o ports/151306 devel/libdispatch fails to install static version of t o ports/151296 [patch] ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod build fails: MNT_NF o ports/150425 www/squid31: rc.d/squid's squid_fib setting ineffectiv o ports/150086 [NEW PORT] net-im/tkabber-plugins-devel: External Plug o ports/149958 x11-toolkits/ocaml-lablgtk2's varcc should (maybe) be f ports/148871 bad packages: p5-XML-Parser-2.36_1 p5-XML-SAX-Expat-0. o ports/148006 Update of devel/ocaml-camomile to 0.7.3 s ports/147829 Improved net/ucarp startup script: multiple VHID and F o ports/146145 [patch] net-mgmt/flow-tools: add OPTIONS support o ports/144982 x11-toolkits/ocaml-lablgtk2 problem: ocamlfind won't f o ports/142743 [PATCH] devel/cross-binutils: installed by *-rtems-gcc f ports/139872 [PATCH] ports-mgmt/porttools: improve port's directory a ports/139203 sysutils/freebsd-snapshot more careful patch not depen o ports/137729 www/mod_auth_kerb2 port broken on 8.0-BETA2 due to sec f ports/122333 net/arping - patch to lookup for interface and src ip, o ports/92651 graphics/gmt - WITH_EVERYTHING doesn't fetch o ports/57498 HEIMDAL_HOME should be defined in src or ports Makefil 226 problems total. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 13:37:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09FC1065678 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:37:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CEF8FC16 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywe9 with SMTP id 9so3501091ywe.13 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 05:37:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.191.164 with SMTP id g24mr15039229yhn.54.1321277836613; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 05:37:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y58sm30903048yhi.17.2011.11.14.05.37.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 05:37:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3ShtF618Dmz2CG5d; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:37:14 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:37:13 -0500 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: sahil@FreeBSD.org Subject: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:37:17 -0000 The "postfix-current" port is still marked as broken: .if ${ARCH} == "amd64" BROKEN= fails during installation .endif Since all previous releases of Postfix worked on FreeBSD, and since Postfix is/was developed on FreeBSD, I was wondering what the problem is with this release. Is there a possibility that this phenomena might be rectified in the near future? -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 13:59:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41CF106564A for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:59:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64DB8FC1A for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:59:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.204.137.226] (helo=tiny.Sisis.de.) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RPx4B-0004WL-8B; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:59:21 +0100 Received: from tiny.Sisis.de. (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiny.Sisis.de. (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pAEDxN97001327; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:59:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by tiny.Sisis.de. (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id pAEDxLvF001326; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:59:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: tiny.Sisis.de.: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:59:21 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111114135921.GA1314@tiny> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 89.204.137.226 Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: 10-CURRENT && ports/devel/gvfs does not compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:59:25 -0000 Hello, I have WITH_FBSD10_FIX=1 in /etc/make.conf and /usr/ports is from CVS from today; caracas# make ... CC gvfsd_archive-daemon-main.o CC gvfsd_archive-daemon-main-generic.o CCLD gvfsd-archive /usr/bin/ld: warning: libcrypto.so.6, needed by /usr/lib/libarchive.so, may conflict with libcrypto.so.7 /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_code@XZ_5.0' /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_stream_decoder@XZ_5.0' /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_lzma_preset@XZ_5.0' /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_alone_encoder@XZ_5.0' /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_end@XZ_5.0' /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_alone_decoder@XZ_5.0' /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_memusage@XZ_5.0' /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_stream_encoder@XZ_5.0' gmake[4]: *** [gvfsd-archive] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/gvfs/work/gvfs-1.6.6/daemon' as well setenv UNAME_r and OSVERSION do not help; Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 14:03:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B590F106566B for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:03:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miwi.freebsd@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9098FC13 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:03:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so25434400pzk.3 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:03:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=U3M2JBnqtAbYmNA9DxgCDukYodTJ457yWMCe6bKMffM=; b=HtodkB5stNsejz4bxuKwP2CbjwQo8QcU7M2IrheC5VnqakZxgsoh+NtqMEAMzqPJtC jCFUMbCw+VbtJUFMKw7whvRw4XYe8XP3qZTGbdJy6yIIN+7nGSaZhFXtaFd9IG44P/Nk ZKlRmesXgHsKGweT/oRFvmN/tb6i4aNI1NEQA= Received: by 10.68.24.231 with SMTP id x7mr49633872pbf.33.1321279420973; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:03:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from yakim.homeunix.com ([175.143.137.32]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p10sm56775402pbd.15.2011.11.14.06.03.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:03:39 -0800 (PST) Sender: Martin Wilke Message-ID: <4EC19021.6070703@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:03:13 +0000 From: Martin Wilke Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111110 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthias Apitz References: <20111114135921.GA1314@tiny> In-Reply-To: <20111114135921.GA1314@tiny> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 10-CURRENT && ports/devel/gvfs does not compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: miwi@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:03:41 -0000 On 11/14/2011 13:59, Matthias Apitz wrote: > Hello, > > I have WITH_FBSD10_FIX=1 in /etc/make.conf and /usr/ports is from CVS from > today; Please update your portstree, WITH_FBSD10_FIX=1 in /etc/make.conf is no longer needed , because its now globally. > > caracas# make > ... > CC gvfsd_archive-daemon-main.o > CC gvfsd_archive-daemon-main-generic.o > CCLD gvfsd-archive > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libcrypto.so.6, needed by /usr/lib/libarchive.so, may conflict with libcrypto.so.7 also i think u never run make delete-old and make delete-old-libs after rebuilding ur world/kernel. - Martin > /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_code@XZ_5.0' > /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_stream_decoder@XZ_5.0' > /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_lzma_preset@XZ_5.0' > /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_alone_encoder@XZ_5.0' > /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_end@XZ_5.0' > /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_alone_decoder@XZ_5.0' > /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_memusage@XZ_5.0' > /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_stream_encoder@XZ_5.0' > gmake[4]: *** [gvfsd-archive] Error 1 > gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/gvfs/work/gvfs-1.6.6/daemon' > > as well setenv UNAME_r and OSVERSION do not help; > > Thanks > > matthias Please update your portstree, WITH_FBSD10_FIX=1 in /etc/make.conf is no longer needed , because its now globally. also i think u never run make delete-old and make delete-old-libs before u rebuild all ports :) -- +-----------------oOO--(_)--OOo-------------------------+ With best Regards, Martin Wilke (miwi_(at)_FreeBSD.org) Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 14:40:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0970A1065673; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:40:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965B38FC13; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:40:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.204.137.226] (helo=tiny.Sisis.de.) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RPxiE-0002mV-5c; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:40:44 +0100 Received: from tiny.Sisis.de. (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiny.Sisis.de. (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pAEEepO6001360; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:40:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by tiny.Sisis.de. (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id pAEEeofY001359; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:40:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: tiny.Sisis.de.: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:40:49 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: Martin Wilke Message-ID: <20111114144048.GA1345@tiny> References: <20111114135921.GA1314@tiny> <4EC19021.6070703@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4EC19021.6070703@FreeBSD.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 89.204.137.226 Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 10-CURRENT && ports/devel/gvfs does not compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:40:47 -0000 El día Monday, November 14, 2011 a las 10:03:13PM +0000, Martin Wilke escribió: > On 11/14/2011 13:59, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have WITH_FBSD10_FIX=1 in /etc/make.conf and /usr/ports is from CVS from > > today; > Please update your portstree, My portstree was from November, 3 and is now from November, 14. I think it is higly uptodate; > > WITH_FBSD10_FIX=1 in /etc/make.conf > > is no longer needed , because its now globally. Setting WITH_FBSD10_FIX=1 was the hint I got last week in current@, do you want me to recompile all ports without this now, or is it just anyway that it is set in /etc/make.conf? > > > > > caracas# make > > ... > > CC gvfsd_archive-daemon-main.o > > CC gvfsd_archive-daemon-main-generic.o > > CCLD gvfsd-archive > > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libcrypto.so.6, needed by /usr/lib/libarchive.so, may conflict with libcrypto.so.7 > > also i think u never run make delete-old and make delete-old-libs after > rebuilding ur world/kernel. correct; I did this now; but the result is the same; the /usr/lib/libarchive.so is from November, 1 (whenn I installed world and kernel), also libcrypt.so.6 in /lib; the libcrypto.so.7 was installed by openssl-1.0.0_6 port and I have recompiled it again; the result for gvfs is the same; thanks for your hints; matthias -- Matthias Apitz e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 15:04:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF365106566C; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:04:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBA48FC15; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.204.137.226] (helo=tiny.Sisis.de.) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RPy5A-0003Uh-Te; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:04:26 +0100 Received: from tiny.Sisis.de. (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiny.Sisis.de. (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pAEF4cdB001401; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:04:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by tiny.Sisis.de. (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id pAEF4bvK001400; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:04:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: tiny.Sisis.de.: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:04:37 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: Martin Wilke , gnome@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20111114150436.GA1384@tiny> References: <20111114135921.GA1314@tiny> <4EC19021.6070703@FreeBSD.org> <20111114144048.GA1345@tiny> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20111114144048.GA1345@tiny> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 89.204.137.226 Cc: Subject: Re: 10-CURRENT && ports/devel/gvfs does not compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:04:31 -0000 El día Monday, November 14, 2011 a las 03:40:49PM +0100, Matthias Apitz escribió: > > > caracas# make > > > ... > > > CC gvfsd_archive-daemon-main.o > > > CC gvfsd_archive-daemon-main-generic.o > > > CCLD gvfsd-archive > > > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libcrypto.so.6, needed by /usr/lib/libarchive.so, may conflict with libcrypto.so.7 > > > > also i think u never run make delete-old and make delete-old-libs after > > rebuilding ur world/kernel. > > correct; I did this now; but the result is the same; the > /usr/lib/libarchive.so is from November, 1 (whenn I installed world and > kernel), also libcrypt.so.6 in /lib; the libcrypto.so.7 was installed by > openssl-1.0.0_6 port and I have recompiled it again; > > the result for gvfs is the same; I nailed it down; there was installed some port archivers/xz; it was installed yesterday, don't know by which other port on the flight; this provided some shared libs in /usr/local/lib/liblzma.* without the missing symbols; after removing this port, gvfs installes fine; matthias -- Matthias Apitz e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 15:23:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4297C106564A; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:23:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (worf.ds9.tecnik93.com [81.196.207.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F5FC8FC0A; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:23:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [81.181.146.246]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CEE122C55E7; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:23:49 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:23:51 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Eitan Adler Message-ID: <20111114172351.2dd53527@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:42:51 +0000 Cc: nivit@freebsd.org, sklauder@trimind.de, renchap@cocoa-x.com, kuriyama@freebsd.org, miwi@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, perl@freebsd.org, amdmi3@freebsd.org, llwang@infor.org, trasz@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Small typos in COMMENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:23:52 -0000 Just go ahead and commit them all. Thanks. On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 02:34:01 -0500 Eitan Adler wrote: > Hi, > > The following ports have a small typo in the COMMENT line. Can you > please commit the change below or permit me to commit this patch? > > Index: iso12083/Makefile > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/textproc/iso12083/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.14 > diff -u -r1.14 Makefile > --- iso12083/Makefile 7 Jul 2003 11:51:38 -0000 1.14 > +++ iso12083/Makefile 13 Nov 2011 07:29:32 -0000 > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ > EXTRACT_ONLY= # empty > > MAINTAINER= kuriyama@FreeBSD.org > -COMMENT= SGML DTDs from the The Electronic Publishing Special > Interest Group +COMMENT= SGML DTDs from The Electronic > Publishing Special Interest Group > > RUN_DEPENDS= ${XMLCATMGR}:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/xmlcatmgr > Index: jpilot-picsnvideos/Makefile > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/palm/jpilot-picsnvideos/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.4 > diff -u -r1.4 Makefile > --- jpilot-picsnvideos/Makefile 23 Sep 2011 22:24:56 > -0000 1.4 +++ jpilot-picsnvideos/Makefile 13 Nov 2011 > 07:29:32 -0000 @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ > PKGNAMEPREFIX= jpilot- > > MAINTAINER= sklauder@trimind.de > -COMMENT= JPilot plugin to to download photos and videos > +COMMENT= JPilot plugin to download photos and videos > > RUN_DEPENDS= jpilot:${PORTSDIR}/palm/jpilot > BUILD_DEPENDS= jpilot:${PORTSDIR}/palm/jpilot > Index: noegnud-littlehack/Makefile > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/games/noegnud-littlehack/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.16 > diff -u -r1.16 Makefile > --- noegnud-littlehack/Makefile 28 Mar 2010 06:35:23 > -0000 1.16 +++ noegnud-littlehack/Makefile 13 Nov 2011 > 07:29:32 -0000 @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ > EXTRACT_ONLY= ${DISTNAME}_linux_src-minimal${EXTRACT_SUFX} > > MAINTAINER= llwang@infor.org > -COMMENT= The noeGNUd UI for the the LittleHack variation of > Nethack +COMMENT= The noeGNUd UI for the LittleHack variation > of Nethack > > RUN_DEPENDS= > ${LOCALBASE}/share/${NOEGNUDVERSION}/data/gui:${PORTSDIR}/games/noegnud-data > > Index: p5-DBICx-Deploy/Makefile > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/databases/p5-DBICx-Deploy/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.6 > diff -u -r1.6 Makefile > --- p5-DBICx-Deploy/Makefile 24 Sep 2011 22:02:35 -0000 > 1.6 +++ p5-DBICx-Deploy/Makefile 13 Nov 2011 07:29:32 -0000 > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ > PKGNAMEPREFIX= p5- > > MAINTAINER= miwi@FreeBSD.org > -COMMENT= Perl 5 module to deploy a a DBIx::Class schema > +COMMENT= Perl 5 module to deploy a DBIx::Class schema > > BUILD_DEPENDS= > p5-DBIx-Class>=0.07003:${PORTSDIR}/databases/p5-DBIx-Class \ > p5-SQL-Translator>=0:${PORTSDIR}/databases/p5-SQL-Translator \ Index: > p5-Rose-DBx-Object-MoreHelpers/Makefile > =================================================================== > RCS > file: /home/pcvs/ports/databases/p5-Rose-DBx-Object-MoreHelpers/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.5 Makefile --- > p5-Rose-DBx-Object-MoreHelpers/Makefile 24 Sep 2010 00:44:18 > -0000 1.5 +++ p5-Rose-DBx-Object-MoreHelpers/Makefile > 13 Nov 2011 07:29:32 -0000 @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ PKGNAMEPREFIX= p5- > > MAINTAINER= miwi@FreeBSD.org > -COMMENT= Perl 5 module to deploy a a DBIx::Class schema > +COMMENT= Perl 5 module to deploy a DBIx::Class schema > > RUN_DEPENDS= > p5-Rose-DB-Object>=0.7730,1:${PORTSDIR}/databases/p5-Rose-DB-Object \ > p5-Data-Dump>=1.06:${PORTSDIR}/devel/p5-Data-Dump > Index: py-nevow/Makefile > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/www/py-nevow/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.17 > diff -u -r1.17 Makefile > --- py-nevow/Makefile 26 Jul 2011 19:59:58 -0000 1.17 > +++ py-nevow/Makefile 13 Nov 2011 07:29:32 -0000 > @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ > EXTRACT_SUFX= .tar.gz?format=raw > > MAINTAINER= nivit@FreeBSD.org > -COMMENT= A web application templating system, based on the > the Twisted Woven +COMMENT= A web application templating > system, based on the Twisted Woven > > BROKEN= does not build > > -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 17:01:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E20106566C for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:01:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) Received: from mailrelay007.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay007.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C950D8FC17 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:01:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAAhJwU5bscXj/2dsb2JhbABCqX6BBoFyAQEFJy8jEAsYLjkeGYgEBrgcBIZqgxUEh1+eSQ Received: from 227.197-177-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.177.197.227]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 14 Nov 2011 18:01:12 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pAEH1BM3004864; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:01:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) From: Tijl Coosemans To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:01:01 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-BETA1; KDE/4.6.5; i386; ; ) References: <201111101608.00906.aorchid@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <201111101608.00906.aorchid@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1657975.hnuX7WL49v"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201111141801.09469.tijl@coosemans.org> Cc: kde@freebsd.org, Aric Gregson Subject: Re: Upgrading KDE 4.6.5 -> 4.7.2 Kmail Errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:01:15 -0000 --nextPart1657975.hnuX7WL49v Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday 11 November 2011 01:08:00 Aric Gregson wrote: > I am receiving new Kmail errors that I have not seen previously, although= I=20 > do see reports of similar on the web. >=20 > Error while uploading message > Could not upload the message dated Today 08:47:52 AM from "SoANDSo"=20 > with subject "FW: SomeSubject" to the server. > The destination folder was: Mednet/inbox. > The server reported: > Command Argument Error. 12 >=20 > This never happened with 4.6.5. I have reinstalled all components of kde= =20 > that I can think of (portmaster kde, plus py-keybinding stuff).=20 >=20 > Any ideas why this may be happening? https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D279702 But that bug has been closed unfortunately because Kontact 4.4.10 is no longer supported. --nextPart1657975.hnuX7WL49v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iF4EABEIAAYFAk7BSVUACgkQfoCS2CCgtis0AgD+Odxl4WGV1TRI3NztGhhky+tV gG5ShwJRQ32wrvVbzJ8A/09yjZGRM/ULtMyKkUKKyk9AEmhumHan194pM3j6vo4l =HGW8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1657975.hnuX7WL49v-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 17:19:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83E0106566C for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:19:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aorchid@mac.com) Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org (mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org [204.13.248.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD458FC08 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dsl081-084-161.lax1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.84.161] helo=[10.0.1.4]) by mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RQ0CL-0009qC-Pj; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:19:58 +0000 X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 64.81.84.161 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX186fJgHAzmVCO3KI0E3KYtK Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:19:56 -0800 From: Aric Gregson To: Tijl Coosemans Message-ID: <20111114091956010047.d48c2f3b@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <201111141801.09469.tijl@coosemans.org> References: <201111101608.00906.aorchid@mac.com> <201111141801.09469.tijl@coosemans.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: GyazMail version 1.5.11 Cc: kde@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading KDE 4.6.5 -> 4.7.2 Kmail Errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:19:58 -0000 On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:01:01 +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279702 > > But that bug has been closed unfortunately because Kontact 4.4.10 is no > longer supported. Thanks for the link and I see that one needs to move to Kontact 4.7.1? Has that not been included in 4.7.2 for FreeBSD? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 17:26:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE971106566C; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:26:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from villa.alberto@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9D18FC15; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:26:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwg14 with SMTP id 14so6603693wwg.31 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:26:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; bh=PGHPmOQgCBZ9gpNiXZD7wmu2y52+bWoZ5jMFZ+fpnew=; b=H1ZguumSLsFeSFhywD4hMZQ89YTEPJzF056J7DN99lU0nPzAtGXnXOvY8g7B87AGFi RqhqHhi4dkMUMmWbExvy06E+O/syw3WpuD3l/phFxQs9KlRIqdh9k33rYNw/Wg8mV9XL wHeXi/xKnAFBzKyCtFAVh8B5+oYCzMl5PLG/8= Received: by 10.216.52.16 with SMTP id d16mr4214607wec.88.1321291573021; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:26:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from woodstock.peanuts (host177-66-dynamic.10-188-r.retail.telecomitalia.it. [188.10.66.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fw16sm25582728wbb.13.2011.11.14.09.26.11 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:26:12 -0800 (PST) Sender: Alberto Villa From: Alberto Villa Organization: The FreeBSD Project To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:26:05 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-RC2; KDE/4.7.2; amd64; ; ) References: <201111101608.00906.aorchid@mac.com> <201111141801.09469.tijl@coosemans.org> <20111114091956010047.d48c2f3b@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20111114091956010047.d48c2f3b@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5373255.Ds4vb4bDRT"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201111141826.10477.avilla@freebsd.org> Cc: Tijl Coosemans , kde@freebsd.org, Aric Gregson Subject: Re: Upgrading KDE 4.6.5 -> 4.7.2 Kmail Errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:26:14 -0000 --nextPart5373255.Ds4vb4bDRT Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday 14 November 2011 18:19:56 Aric Gregson wrote: > Thanks for the link and I see that one needs to move to Kontact 4.7.1? > Has that not been included in 4.7.2 for FreeBSD? Kontact 4.7.3 is in kde@ testing repository, and can be installed in place = of=20 4.4.11.1: http://freebsd.kde.org/area51.php Ask, if you want help. We decided to hold it back because it has proven to be unstable, but we're= =20 constantly testing it on every new release waiting for it to be production= =20 ready. Should you want to give it a try, we ask you to report back about=20 your experience. =2D-=20 Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla You shall judge of a man by his foes as well as by his friends. -- Joseph Conrad --nextPart5373255.Ds4vb4bDRT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iJwEAAECAAYFAk7BTzIACgkQ3xiC6kQ1Cots9QP/chx896zBnBB00PqbeU6D1rhy LHrJu/R6J9nvl+s433S/jP/suyKyPy1tAUwCPAeXxJWhBEQ9LmkoE48cWj1xyKgq Oxf7w/dzJqapw/m9+Jkuy1NVW4sD3ffacyphgWLbZkAA9f1yE8uLoH52r/k80uS+ AD0hw3eFEq8ecQUpwcc= =S85T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5373255.Ds4vb4bDRT-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 17:35:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8610F106564A; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:35:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aorchid@mac.com) Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org (mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org [204.13.248.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033CC8FC0A; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:35:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dsl081-084-161.lax1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.84.161] helo=[10.0.1.4]) by mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RQ0R0-0005EM-BS; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:35:06 +0000 X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 64.81.84.161 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+M9qnbtxIthnjPnlYoCy/V Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:35:04 -0800 From: Aric Gregson To: Alberto Villa Message-ID: <20111114093504817328.1e9c4adb@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <201111141826.10477.avilla@freebsd.org> References: <201111101608.00906.aorchid@mac.com> <201111141801.09469.tijl@coosemans.org> <20111114091956010047.d48c2f3b@mac.com> <201111141826.10477.avilla@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: GyazMail version 1.5.11 Cc: Tijl Coosemans , kde@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading KDE 4.6.5 -> 4.7.2 Kmail Errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:35:07 -0000 On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:26:05 +0100, Alberto Villa wrote: > Kontact 4.7.3 is in kde@ testing repository, and can be installed in > place of 4.4.11.1: http://freebsd.kde.org/area51.php [snip] Thanks for your prompt reply. Given that you don't feel it is stable yet, I'll try turning off all Kmail filters for now and see who it goes. I do need at least one stable email program. Thanks again, Aric From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 19:39:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5417C1065680 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:39:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@passap.ru) Received: from forward13.mail.yandex.net (forward13.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17948FC0A for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (smtp12.mail.yandex.net [95.108.131.191]) by forward13.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 61A2B1460BF for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:39:33 +0400 (MSK) Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 42FFA16A02D7 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:39:33 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 46.38.32.118.tel.ru (46.38.32.118.tel.ru [46.38.32.118]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id dWcCMie3-dWcOtEOP; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:39:33 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Message-ID: <4EC16E74.7040903@passap.ru> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:39:32 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111114 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: multimedia/phonon: CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:58 (if): X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:39:35 -0000 Hi List, I've got an error while multimedia/phonon building: ----- % uname -a FreeBSD srv.bb.tel.ru 9.0-RC2 FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 #0: Sun Nov 13 03:46:26 SAMT 2011 bsam@srv.bb.tel.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BB i386 % sudo make -C /usr/ports/multimedia/phonon [...] -- Performing Test __KDE_HAVE_GCC_VISIBILITY -- Performing Test __KDE_HAVE_GCC_VISIBILITY - Success CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:58 (if): if given arguments: "AND" "PHONON_BUILD_DESIGNER_PLUGIN" Unknown arguments specified -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! *** Error code 1 ----- I found alike problem but it's a warning while for me it's an error: http://kde.ixsystems.com/index.php?action=display_markup_log&build=9-area51&id=689 Any help is appreciated. Thanks! -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 19:59:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mandree.no-ip.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A893C1065674 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:59:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mandree@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C708723D2E4 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:59:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4EC17327.6030905@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:59:35 +0100 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110922 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20111109124325.17efc0d1.stas@deglitch.com> <20111109222435.GD92221@azathoth.lan> <20111110110637.GA3514@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <20111110110637.GA3514@hades.panopticon> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Recent ports removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:59:47 -0000 Am 10.11.2011 12:06, schrieb Dmitry Marakasov: > Why should we go through it again and again? If it's not broken, it's > useable, you may not remove it, period. It appears to me that yours - although shared with mi@ - is a minority vote, and on top of that, also one with little weight because -- and this is my personal perception that is likely to differ -- it is from one of the people who nag about the policy of fact, and rather talk, than grab a port and fix it so it can stay. Where "work" in the previous paragraph can be substituted with providing other resources, like recruiting new volunteers, bribing current contributors, or thereabout. Nagging from your seat isn't helpful. Now, let's get constructive, here are my ideas for the current round of port removal nagging: 1. I'd like to officially propose to remove the MAINTAINER=ports@FreeBSD.org tag from unmaintained ports and have the ports/Mk/bsd.*.mk stuff be explicit about the port being unmaintained, so as to pull this rug from underneath the naggers so they can no longer delude anyone to believe a port were "maintained by ports@". 2. We could see to exposing deprecations or somethings more clearly. portmaster -L is a contributor here, but I think it needs to move closer to the baseline source. Marking such mars in INDEX (dougb@ mentioned that) sounds useful to me, if it's viable. Else we can consider bumping PORTREVISION when marking a port FORBIDDEN or DEPRECATED so that this change gets exposed. 3. Perhaps we should also consider not to build packages for ports that have the slightest mar (DEPRECATED, unmaintained, whatever) -- but that requires more discussion and thought. You won't leave footprints (read: make any difference to existing practice) unless and until you walk (read: work). From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 20:02:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mandree.no-ip.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 565861065672 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:02:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mandree@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976D123D2E4 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:02:24 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4EC173D0.5080208@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:02:24 +0100 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110922 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20111109124325.17efc0d1.stas@deglitch.com> <20111109222435.GD92221@azathoth.lan> <20111110110637.GA3514@hades.panopticon> <4EBD9D25.7020406@FreeBSD.org> <4EC027D4.60808@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <4EC027D4.60808@aldan.algebra.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Recent ports removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:02:25 -0000 If it were to be "consensus" we wouldn't be moving anywhere as a project, so that certainly won't count. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 21:29:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5819C106564A for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:29:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14CD98FC08 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:29:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RQ45s-00050h-MO for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:29:32 +0100 Received: from 189.61.210.138 ([189.61.210.138]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:29:32 +0100 Received: from rakuco by 189.61.210.138 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:29:32 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Raphael Kubo da Costa Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:29:17 -0200 Lines: 37 Message-ID: <87mxbyo0k2.fsf@FreeBSD.org> References: <4EC16E74.7040903@passap.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 189.61.210.138 User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (berkeley-unix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:CEPKvDzajG89LyzKKFXex/WWGu0= Subject: Re: multimedia/phonon: CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:58 (if): X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:29:34 -0000 Boris Samorodov writes: > Hi List, > > I've got an error while multimedia/phonon building: > ----- > % uname -a > FreeBSD srv.bb.tel.ru 9.0-RC2 FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 #0: Sun Nov 13 03:46:26 > SAMT 2011 bsam@srv.bb.tel.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BB i386 > > % sudo make -C /usr/ports/multimedia/phonon > [...] > -- Performing Test __KDE_HAVE_GCC_VISIBILITY > -- Performing Test __KDE_HAVE_GCC_VISIBILITY - Success > CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:58 (if): > if given arguments: > > "AND" "PHONON_BUILD_DESIGNER_PLUGIN" > > Unknown arguments specified > > > -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! > *** Error code 1 > ----- > > I found alike problem but it's a warning while for me it's an error: > http://kde.ixsystems.com/index.php?action=display_markup_log&build=9-area51&id=689 > > Any help is appreciated. Thanks! Thanks, I've just fixed this upstream and added my fix to area51 (r7826). I'll commit it to ports as soon as I get an OK from avilla or makc. BTW, you were supposed to get a warning instead of an error too, do you have some special setting that raises the severity of warnings? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 22:39:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D378106564A; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:39:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from poyopoyo@puripuri.plala.or.jp) Received: from msa03b.plala.or.jp (msa03.plala.or.jp [IPv6:2400:7800:0:5010::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6EB08FC0C; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:39:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from i220-220-25-30.s02.a026.ap.plala.or.jp ([220.220.25.30]) by msa03b.plala.or.jp with ESMTP id <20111114223907.XSON5763.msa03b.plala.or.jp@i220-220-25-30.s02.a026.ap.plala.or.jp>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:39:07 +0900 Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:39:06 +0900 Message-ID: <86ty66qqgl.wl%poyopoyo@puripuri.plala.or.jp> From: poyopoyo@puripuri.plala.or.jp To: Matthias Apitz In-Reply-To: <20111114135921.GA1314@tiny> References: <20111114135921.GA1314@tiny> Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, gnome@freebsd.org, poyopoyo@puripuri.plala.or.jp User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-2022-JP-2?B?R29qGyQoRCtXGyhC?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/23.3 (amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-VirusScan: Outbound; msa03b; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:39:07 +0900 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:05:44 +0000 Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 10-CURRENT && ports/devel/gvfs does not compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:39:09 -0000 At Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:59:21 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > caracas# make > ... > CC gvfsd_archive-daemon-main.o > CC gvfsd_archive-daemon-main-generic.o > CCLD gvfsd-archive > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libcrypto.so.6, needed by /usr/lib/libarchive.so, may conflict with libcrypto.so.7 > /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_code@XZ_5.0' > /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_stream_decoder@XZ_5.0' > /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_lzma_preset@XZ_5.0' > /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_alone_encoder@XZ_5.0' > /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_end@XZ_5.0' > /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_alone_decoder@XZ_5.0' > /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_memusage@XZ_5.0' > /usr/lib/libarchive.so: undefined reference to `lzma_stream_encoder@XZ_5.0' > gmake[4]: *** [gvfsd-archive] Error 1 > gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/gvfs/work/gvfs-1.6.6/daemon' It is likely with you to have xz from ports or something other than base. Remove it and everything should go fine. -- kuro From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 02:39:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA383106564A; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:39:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from spartan.hamla.org (spartan.hamla.org [206.251.255.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89658FC12; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3622317088; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:24:06 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tandon.net; h= user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:subject:from:from:date:date:received:received; s=aegis; t=1321323845; bh=+pAP6juXV310NI5GfVYgrOyvK2Gq7ByNJWRD0Hs4dpw=; b= BbloZHD216W3akR3eI30ELg2ceLu/Y41mjFKJqV6enUNyjVl27/tm46avHw4aOrG amVwV7/dr45dibdyt9KzQdUZzUB6svtOPC5l0EozI0iS5cySmE1MkrmZBBh46jWI hQS6lJAOnNWbpMh0ByQ2spAz0v91fRCzMOzQk4j3SHU= X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at spartan.hamla.org Received: from spartan.hamla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spartan.hamla.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with LMTP id BWq72a5a3m69; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:24:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from magic.hamla.org (cpe-68-174-92-20.nyc.res.rr.com [68.174.92.20]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0130517042; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:24:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:24:30 -0500 From: Sahil Tandon To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> References: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: swills@FreeBSD.org, freebsd@beardz.net, pav@FreeBSD.org, eadler@FreeBSD.org, gjb@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:39:22 -0000 [ pav@ and those who tested mail/postifx-current on amd64 added to Cc: ] On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 08:37:13 -0500, Jerry wrote: > The "postfix-current" port is still marked as broken: > > .if ${ARCH} == "amd64" > BROKEN= fails during installation > .endif > > Since all previous releases of Postfix worked on FreeBSD, and since > Postfix is/was developed on FreeBSD, I was wondering what the problem > is with this release. Is there a possibility that this phenomena might > be rectified in the near future? Thanks for your report, Jerry. You are correct that FreeBSD is the main development platform for Postfix. It seems that pointyhat's amd64 machine throws an error during the install phase. Pav noticed this and marked the port BROKEN; however, neither I nor a few others I've enlisted can reproduce the error. Would you mind removing the conditional that marks this port BROKEN, try to build/install in your amd64 environment, and report the results? Pav, if nobody else can reproduce the error seen on pointyhat, can portmgr look into whether there is something quirky with the amd64 pointyhat machine? -- Sahil Tandon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 02:46:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B7B1065673 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:46:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [199.48.134.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A137A8FC19 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:46:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18435 invoked by uid 0); 14 Nov 2011 21:46:02 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO glenbarber.us) (76.124.49.145) by 0 with SMTP; 14 Nov 2011 21:46:02 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:45:57 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20111115024556.GA23021@glenbarber.us> References: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: swills@FreeBSD.org, freebsd@beardz.net, pav@FreeBSD.org, eadler@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:46:03 -0000 --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 09:24:30PM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote: > [ pav@ and those who tested mail/postifx-current on amd64 added to Cc: ] >=20 > On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 08:37:13 -0500, Jerry wrote: >=20 > > The "postfix-current" port is still marked as broken: > >=20 > > .if ${ARCH} =3D=3D "amd64" > > BROKEN=3D fails during installation > > .endif > >=20 > > Since all previous releases of Postfix worked on FreeBSD, and since > > Postfix is/was developed on FreeBSD, I was wondering what the problem > > is with this release. Is there a possibility that this phenomena might > > be rectified in the near future? >=20 > Thanks for your report, Jerry. You are correct that FreeBSD is the main > development platform for Postfix. It seems that pointyhat's amd64 > machine throws an error during the install phase. Pav noticed this and > marked the port BROKEN; however, neither I nor a few others I've > enlisted can reproduce the error. Would you mind removing the > conditional that marks this port BROKEN, try to build/install in your > amd64 environment, and report the results?=20 >=20 > Pav, if nobody else can reproduce the error seen on pointyhat, can > portmgr look into whether there is something quirky with the amd64 > pointyhat machine? >=20 I don't have the successful build logs anymore, so I've just re-queued a build of postfix-current on 9-STABLE (-RC2) amd64 in my tinderbox if the results are of interest to those that can investigate any potential pointyhat anomalies. Regards, Glen --=20 Glen Barber | gjb@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Documentation Project --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOwdJkAAoJEFJPDDeguUajheMIALt7jK6luOL5XhyF0vdwvfo1 ked7VBdc1qcMhSzLA7Opn51lJ1M6eB8RHvQqwZJemtFDvYfyd5EvUw5/MDSItJ9U wDvWAXvaIHBoK1XIixcyuDWVyjon+lDra/vT7YFjM3OCAz0//Klg9PhK246ESYmM 7z94BGTrkHyvr9FyyGyUGsoPAp7mg+5YYTqcedPkdfYEAvwmGG6EXQ+UH40LwIVO za5bu3Qm0NYbK8tM9XEjDwQ58GO4DDFW0+QPBI4Bn8u09do6zWRnbhyza2pIhUck VW83xf0oVt6gMBI0vubQd/DnWjh94Z9pms2mGffLtx+4HouTNz2GpH2A5GTmoNs= =rLxP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 03:00:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D315A106564A; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 03:00:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aorchid@mac.com) Received: from out-76.smtp.ucla.edu (smtp-15.smtp.ucla.edu [IPv6:2607:f010:3fe:102:101c:23ff:fed0:93ec]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4B48FC0A; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 03:00:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-15.smtp.ucla.edu (smtp-15.smtp.ucla.edu [169.232.46.242]) by out-76.smtp.ucla.edu with ESMTP id pAF30ig2008117; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:00:44 -0800 Received: from mail.ucla.edu (mail.ucla.edu [169.232.46.158]) by smtp-15.smtp.ucla.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pAF30ig2008117; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:00:44 -0800 Received: from freeenv.localnet ([149.142.103.17]) (user=aorchid mech=PLAIN bits=0) by mail.ucla.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAF30hI9031343 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:00:43 -0800 From: Aric Gregson Organization: Slow Children at Play Productions To: Alberto Villa Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:00:39 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.7.2; amd64; ; ) References: <201111101608.00906.aorchid@mac.com> <20111114091956010047.d48c2f3b@mac.com> <201111141826.10477.avilla@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201111141826.10477.avilla@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201111141900.40376.aorchid@mac.com> X-Probable-Spam: no X-Spam-Hits: 0.654 X-Spam-Score: * X-Spam-Report: SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Scanned-By: smtp.ucla.edu on 169.232.46.242 Cc: Tijl Coosemans , kde@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading KDE 4.6.5 -> 4.7.2 Kmail Errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 03:00:52 -0000 On Monday, November 14, 2011 09:26:05 AM Alberto Villa wrote: > Should you want to give it a try, we ask you to report back about > your experience. OK, I've changed my mind. KMail is won't stop with the warnings and it is distracting. It is possible to just replace Kontact and not the rest of KDE, right? Aric From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 07:19:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D562106566C; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:19:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from villa.alberto@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D408FC13; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:19:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so6265214wyf.13 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:19:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; bh=J6kwC1lo4UslVhWc7QdESwx4Ju4f5Z+xkU5+wpd9KVE=; b=jpOStDq/MZjORyHow3iRKkSlqMnUN5tooMZ5AZj4L9FCKfWPGJSX0lxQT3i6v0T+Ii S49o5STkDee9hhjQtCXurdR5FZ5Yfwtms49kG9V4W46LqEWuufeC5tidCcUWQpv6SlrC Ke5cLwPvu9GpryPR9LLn1M8TYD7bIKCNJ5wVM= Received: by 10.180.81.163 with SMTP id b3mr28756403wiy.20.1321341582443; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:19:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from woodstock.peanuts (wifinat-16.polito.it. [130.192.232.16]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f18sm13727119wiv.14.2011.11.14.23.19.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:19:41 -0800 (PST) Sender: Alberto Villa From: Alberto Villa Organization: The FreeBSD Project To: Aric Gregson Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:19:37 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-RC2; KDE/4.7.3; amd64; ; ) References: <201111101608.00906.aorchid@mac.com> <201111141826.10477.avilla@freebsd.org> <201111141900.40376.aorchid@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <201111141900.40376.aorchid@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1903234.uNOsYI2Y7g"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201111150819.40756.avilla@freebsd.org> Cc: Tijl Coosemans , kde@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading KDE 4.6.5 -> 4.7.2 Kmail Errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:19:44 -0000 --nextPart1903234.uNOsYI2Y7g Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 15 November 2011 04:00:39 Aric Gregson wrote: > OK, I've changed my mind. KMail is won't stop with the warnings and it is > distracting. It is possible to just replace Kontact and not the rest of > KDE, right? Yes. Uninstall kdepim4 and kdepim4-runtime, checkout area51, run=20 `kdemerge -m /usr/ports` (warning: this will pollute your ports tree... we= =20 will try to fix this - alternatively, you can just replace those two ports = with=20 those in area51), and install kdepim4. =2D-=20 Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla =46irst Rule of History: History doesn't repeat itself -- historians merely repeat each other. --nextPart1903234.uNOsYI2Y7g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iJwEAAECAAYFAk7CEowACgkQ3xiC6kQ1Cotk3wP/WOQ4nFc4Y0shzTCgX5u3/7N/ yW4MfUyaCjd728s/tUbPF36T013XW0on2p1ZlKHFSMQpeiKGm6MgFBk37G2O+BNv AIDXSo0RTGHXpDPvsX8goX+tnNUWqkacNbdPApud8afzBXLVFgyj2dfW9ZZAAYQS oPk9uQ/Jv4dpUfwoCvo= =lj0t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1903234.uNOsYI2Y7g-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 07:38:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E32106566C for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:38:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (trang.nuxi.org [74.95.12.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F188A8FC08 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:38:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pAF6xVKT074826; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:59:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.5/8.14.4/Submit) id pAF6xVEB074825; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:59:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:59:31 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Jason Hellenthal Message-ID: <20111115065931.GB74790@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <20111107011158.GA24314@DataIX.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111107011158.GA24314@DataIX.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT X-to-the-FBI-CIA-and-NSA: HI! HOW YA DOIN? User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: shells/bash 4.1 -> 4.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:38:44 -0000 On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 08:11:58PM -0500, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > Are there any plans to update this port to 4.2 yet ? Not until FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE is done. Bash is *way* too widely used to chance a problem with a new version. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 10:17:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F36106564A for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:17:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ftp51246-2575596@sh4-5.1blu.de) Received: from sh4-5.1blu.de (sh4-5.1blu.de [213.83.63.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA108FC0A for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ftp51246-2575596 by sh4-5.1blu.de with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RQFcw-0002xf-7M for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:48:26 +0100 Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:48:26 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111115094823.GA9461@sh4-5.1blu.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Subject: cvs checkout ./. csup X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:17:49 -0000 Hello, Since many years I'm fetching or updating /usr/ports with # cd /usr # setenv CVSROOT :pserver:anoncvs@anoncvs.fr.FreeBSD.org:/home/ncvs # cvs checkout ports and later do the updating just with: # cd /usr/ports # cvs update # portupgrade -ai The FreeBSD handbook describes (or recommends?) using 'csup' for updating ports tree... What is the advantage (or reason, if any)? Thanks in advance matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 10:18:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B90D106564A; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:18:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sup.oook.cz (sup.oook.cz [94.23.0.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C96A8FC13; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:18:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.23] (ip-78-102-160-251.net.upcbroadband.cz [78.102.160.251]) (authenticated bits=0) by sup.oook.cz (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAF9jJvJ068385; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:45:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) From: Pav Lucistnik To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> References: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-VpjmggtiR476n8KPSg6+" Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:45:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1321350319.84509.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 94.23.0.135 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: sup.oook.cz; Sender-ip: 78.102.160.251; Sender-helo: [192.168.0.23]; ) Cc: swills@FreeBSD.org, freebsd@beardz.net, eadler@FreeBSD.org, gjb@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:18:58 -0000 --=-VpjmggtiR476n8KPSg6+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 1) The problem is not amd64 specific 2) No point unmarking BROKEN, it currently fails on i386 pointyhat nodes too 3) Diagnosis is hard because the postfix-install shell script prints no useful progress messages Example failure log: http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.8.20111103071512/po= stfix-current-2.9.20111012,4.log Sahil Tandon p=ED=B9e v po 14. 11. 2011 v 21:24 -0500: > [ pav@ and those who tested mail/postifx-current on amd64 added to Cc: ] >=20 > On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 08:37:13 -0500, Jerry wrote: >=20 > > The "postfix-current" port is still marked as broken: > >=20 > > .if ${ARCH} =3D=3D "amd64" > > BROKEN=3D fails during installation > > .endif > >=20 > > Since all previous releases of Postfix worked on FreeBSD, and since > > Postfix is/was developed on FreeBSD, I was wondering what the problem > > is with this release. Is there a possibility that this phenomena might > > be rectified in the near future? >=20 > Thanks for your report, Jerry. You are correct that FreeBSD is the main > development platform for Postfix. It seems that pointyhat's amd64 > machine throws an error during the install phase. Pav noticed this and > marked the port BROKEN; however, neither I nor a few others I've > enlisted can reproduce the error. Would you mind removing the > conditional that marks this port BROKEN, try to build/install in your > amd64 environment, and report the results?=20 >=20 > Pav, if nobody else can reproduce the error seen on pointyhat, can > portmgr look into whether there is something quirky with the amd64 > pointyhat machine? >=20 --=20 --=20 Pav Lucistnik Two sausages are in a frying pan. One says, "Geez, it's hot in here isn't it?" And the other one says, "Aaaaaah! A talking sausage!" --=-VpjmggtiR476n8KPSg6+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk7CNKkACgkQntdYP8FOsoIWMQCgjALErTQiWg6yuSLZkvo9XQ29 YAkAnjdMRCEKYLFJSk7E9ryF5ICbWML2 =QYi9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-VpjmggtiR476n8KPSg6+-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 11:01:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4F2106566C for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:01:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409668FC19 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:01:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pAFB18XS063814 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:01:08 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.1 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk pAFB18XS063814 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1321354868; bh=3CGlbkE8lSyTSZH0haAtETPKt8DC4vj0/bxcjln8AsE=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc; b=phWQaSmHJVhQi7+Et46+3ISW1f//f+u7OWVStCysTFi6O7T5TWpNFZbqMwTueWD1c wFBEw8UA8pIbopj4fu96XjMSeW/HBd7jrW8CviN2WxJMs9LVeDUog/T++famrwtRBg icHzXlTxXRjITu9vTCcut6jDgN2bhltycBC8CMYA= Message-ID: <4EC2466B.3020808@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:00:59 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20111115094823.GA9461@sh4-5.1blu.de> In-Reply-To: <20111115094823.GA9461@sh4-5.1blu.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig407A6CBA3330C0B5115475B1" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: cvs checkout ./. csup X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:01:17 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig407A6CBA3330C0B5115475B1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 15/11/2011 09:48, Matthias Apitz wrote: > Since many years I'm fetching or updating /usr/ports with >=20 > # cd /usr > # setenv CVSROOT :pserver:anoncvs@anoncvs.fr.FreeBSD.org:/home/ncvs > # cvs checkout ports >=20 > and later do the updating just with: >=20 > # cd /usr/ports > # cvs update > # portupgrade -ai >=20 > The FreeBSD handbook describes (or recommends?) using 'csup' for > updating ports tree... What is the advantage (or reason, if any)? Efficiency, basically. csup should require less bandwidth and put less load on servers than using cvs directly. It works like rsync, only transferring the parts of the files that changed but exploiting the cvs revision history to produce more specific and minimal deltas than you can get just by using the standard rsync algorithm. However csup(1) doesn't give you any of the VCS features you'ld get by doing a cvs checkout -- so no simple way to diff a local copy against the repo, etc. etc. 'cvs checkout' of all or parts of the ports is still frequently preferable for developing rather than just using the ports. There are also many more cvsup servers worldwide than there are anon-cvs servers. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig407A6CBA3330C0B5115475B1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7CRnMACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwn/gCeN6TCityuCC6psHbN8v9gcJIW wYgAn1BRfLXoZ27D9Tv7sNjkFnWIomjG =CDGG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig407A6CBA3330C0B5115475B1-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 11:39:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFEE3106564A for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:39:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 624658FC13 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:39:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2011 11:12:39 -0000 Received: from hu5.abaxx.de (EHLO [10.6.25.100]) [213.61.170.110] by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 15 Nov 2011 12:12:39 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1956535 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18l7NhicoQlPPthC7EBX3arxc00EW1TAXAam+O0U5 FIyfp6hHPafwdK Message-ID: <4EC24926.3090308@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:12:38 +0100 From: olli hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pav@FreeBSD.org References: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> <1321350319.84509.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <1321350319.84509.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: swills@FreeBSD.org, freebsd@beardz.net, eadler@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, gjb@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:39:22 -0000 On 2011-11-15 10:45, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > 1) The problem is not amd64 specific > > 2) No point unmarking BROKEN, it currently fails on i386 pointyhat nodes > too > > 3) Diagnosis is hard because the postfix-install shell script prints no > useful progress messages > > Example failure log: > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.8.20111103071512/postfix-current-2.9.20111012,4.log Seems It stops at the point where the ${WRKSRC}/conf/post-install script is executed pointyhat: ... Updating /usr/local/share/doc/postfix/scache.8.html... Updating /usr/local/share/doc/postfix/tlsmgr.8.html... *** Error code 1 Stop in /a/ports/mail/postfix-current. *** Error code 1 tinderbox: ... Updating /usr/local/share/doc/postfix/scache.8.html... Updating /usr/local/share/doc/postfix/tlsmgr.8.html... Warning: you still need to edit myorigin/mydestination/mynetworks parameter settings in /usr/local/etc/postfix/main.cf. Can you test this silly patch? --- Makefile.orig 2011-11-15 11:26:05.000000000 +0100 +++ Makefile 2011-11-15 12:07:33.000000000 +0100 @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ @${ECHO} '$$html_directory/$f:f:root:-:644' \ >> ${WRKSRC}/conf/postfix-files .endfor + ${ECHO} '#!/bin/sh' > ${WRKSRC}/conf/post-install && ${CHMOD} 755 ${WRKSRC}/conf/post-install do-configure: (cd ${WRKSRC} && ${MAKE} -f Makefile.init makefiles ${MAKEFILEFLAGS} \ -- Regards, olli From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 13:36:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D9271065692 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnebdal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A7A8FC0A for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:36:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iakl21 with SMTP id l21so10402051iak.13 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:36:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GbPngjYCd0HfQJ06Y2U7JdNibWmGFQw9C2OMtxSrn+s=; b=sjTTBSYRK9I9QFR7dzUdIXEQECcbskm8W1ZJ4sZJP0hA/1oVU6CXlPr8bCbg+mE4T0 QW+6unRDvOfZYwssigoNfZcbVRh75eAFYqkMhjq+6/0tR9xJMz+sC3+o3o4zyTvFDMj9 tXLlb+TfoceUV1PhO6UpeqE2x00I1vBAdhd40= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.45.9 with SMTP id c9mr6152668ibf.73.1321362323697; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:05:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.33.205 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:05:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EC2466B.3020808@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20111115094823.GA9461@sh4-5.1blu.de> <4EC2466B.3020808@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:05:23 +0100 Message-ID: From: Daniel Nebdal To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: cvs checkout ./. csup X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:36:03 -0000 On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 15/11/2011 09:48, Matthias Apitz wrote: >> Since many years I'm fetching or updating /usr/ports with >> >> # cd /usr >> # setenv CVSROOT :pserver:anoncvs@anoncvs.fr.FreeBSD.org:/home/ncvs >> # cvs checkout ports >> >> and later do the updating just with: >> >> # cd /usr/ports >> # cvs update >> # portupgrade -ai >> >> The FreeBSD handbook describes (or recommends?) using 'csup' for >> updating ports tree... What is the advantage (or reason, if any)? > > Efficiency, basically. =A0csup should require less bandwidth and put less > load on servers than using cvs directly. =A0It works like rsync, only > transferring the parts of the files that changed but exploiting the cvs > revision history to produce more specific and minimal deltas than you > can get just by using the standard rsync algorithm. > > However csup(1) doesn't give you any of the VCS features you'ld get by > doing a cvs checkout -- so no simple way to diff a local copy against > the repo, etc. etc. 'cvs checkout' of all or parts of the ports is still > frequently preferable for developing rather than just using the ports. > > There are also many more cvsup servers worldwide than there are anon-cvs > servers. > There's also portsnap, which has been in the base system for a while now. It has some of the same drawbacks as csup/cvsup (no VCS features), but is in my experience faster than them. In short, you can use "portsnap fetch extract" to download a complete compressed tarball of current ports and extract it, and after doing that you can use "portsnap fetch update" to update to the current state. Read the manpage; there are some important details. It uses a binary patch system that's quite efficient, so if you just want an updated /usr/ports , it's probably the fastest solution. (I think the exact method is that "fetch" grabs a tarball if it doesn't exist. If it does exist, it gets the binary patches required to update it to the current state. With it in place, "extract" unpacks the entire thing, and "update" only extracts the files touched by the last "fetch"-command.) It has a handbook page: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/portsnap.html --=20 Daniel Nebdal From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 14:32:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC351065672; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:32:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from spartan.hamla.org (spartan.hamla.org [206.251.255.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 360628FC15; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:32:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CB017088; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:32:34 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tandon.net; h= date:date:subject:subject:from:from:x-mailer:message-id :content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:received:received; s=aegis; t=1321367553; bh=vO4qVHt7JEum8Et7ybAK+jo4SG8uqIBJxjtyqzKiRGI=; b= e5mgP7QRnKuk+0Q3qeJETYWaRnPtCJerOSs/ezM5c1NjDMgrsV57o0BKWABtELPg XOFSUVoPpWhTbYmzLvNA2VeHCfe/S2JiVersZX4ObDRgcnID6nou8VB1WcaCH9gS 80seqLfZ4rMBOeUyPy3du9OotvHvUa1HplL3Lhpsdl4= X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at spartan.hamla.org Received: from spartan.hamla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spartan.hamla.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with LMTP id H1RJ0yqeSUrM; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:32:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.83.137.59] (mobile-166-137-137-074.mycingular.net [166.137.137.74]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 268E517042; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:32:31 -0500 (EST) References: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> <1321350319.84509.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <1321350319.84509.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Message-Id: <2859B9B3-0A75-40FD-B444-8885A6589A37@tandon.net> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9A405) From: Sahil Tandon Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:31:49 -0500 To: "pav@FreeBSD.org" Cc: "swills@FreeBSD.org" , "freebsd@beardz.net" , "eadler@FreeBSD.org" , "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" , "gjb@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:32:04 -0000 It was marked broken on a particular architecture, hence the genesis of this= thread. I appreciate that diagnosis is difficult; perhaps Olli's suggestio= n is helpful in isolating the issue. I do not know how else to troubleshoot= since these pointyhat errors are not - AFAIK - reproducible by others, on e= ither i386 or amd64 platforms. On Nov 15, 2011, at 4:45 AM, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > 1) The problem is not amd64 specific >=20 > 2) No point unmarking BROKEN, it currently fails on i386 pointyhat nodes > too >=20 > 3) Diagnosis is hard because the postfix-install shell script prints no > useful progress messages >=20 > Example failure log: > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.8.20111103071512/p= ostfix-current-2.9.20111012,4.log >=20 > Sahil Tandon p=C3=AD=C5=A1e v po 14. 11. 2011 v 21:24 -0500: >> [ pav@ and those who tested mail/postifx-current on amd64 added to Cc: ] >>=20 >> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 08:37:13 -0500, Jerry wrote: >>=20 >>> The "postfix-current" port is still marked as broken: >>>=20 >>> .if ${ARCH} =3D=3D "amd64" >>> BROKEN=3D fails during installation >>> .endif >>>=20 >>> Since all previous releases of Postfix worked on FreeBSD, and since >>> Postfix is/was developed on FreeBSD, I was wondering what the problem >>> is with this release. Is there a possibility that this phenomena might >>> be rectified in the near future? >>=20 >> Thanks for your report, Jerry. You are correct that FreeBSD is the main >> development platform for Postfix. It seems that pointyhat's amd64 >> machine throws an error during the install phase. Pav noticed this and >> marked the port BROKEN; however, neither I nor a few others I've >> enlisted can reproduce the error. Would you mind removing the >> conditional that marks this port BROKEN, try to build/install in your >> amd64 environment, and report the results?=20 >>=20 >> Pav, if nobody else can reproduce the error seen on pointyhat, can >> portmgr look into whether there is something quirky with the amd64 >> pointyhat machine? >>=20 >=20 > --=20 > --=20 > Pav Lucistnik > > Two sausages are in a frying pan. One says, "Geez, it's hot in here > isn't it?" And the other one says, "Aaaaaah! A talking sausage!" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 14:52:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3DAB1065670 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:52:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207848FC08 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:52:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id QAA01328; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:34:22 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4EC2786E.5060907@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:34:22 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111003 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chris Rees , Baptiste Daroussin , Doug Barton Subject: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:52:57 -0000 Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its distfile (via my FreeBSD account). Maintaining the port should be rather easy as it can not have any security issues by definition and at the moment there is no active upstream, so no code changes are expected. P.S. Sorry that I've missed its deprecation. I haven't noticed the activity until I needed to use it at yet another system. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 15:07:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB0D1065673; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:07:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F208FC08; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:07:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAFF7dYG077672; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:07:39 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id pAFF7ds3077671; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:07:39 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:07:35 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Andriy Gapon Message-ID: <20111115150735.GA96251@azathoth.lan> References: <4EC2786E.5060907@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EC2786E.5060907@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FreeBSD Ports , Chris Rees , Doug Barton Subject: Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:07:39 -0000 --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:34:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: >=20 > Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? > If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. > I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its distfile= (via my > FreeBSD account). >=20 > Maintaining the port should be rather easy as it can not have any securit= y issues > by definition and at the moment there is no active upstream, so no code c= hanges > are expected. >=20 > P.S. Sorry that I've missed its deprecation. I haven't noticed the activ= ity until > I needed to use it at yet another system. >=20 I often use sysutils/stress don't know if that fits your needs? regards, Bapt --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk7CgDcACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwLTQCeI+et88AyF3xhSN3RLO0+2Jr8 GGYAmwc7iQbZvuqGvifvLO/6YRi5Gxvr =nHSG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 15:31:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32337106566B for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:31:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D94AF8FC0A for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:31:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl11 with SMTP id l11so3428258yen.13 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:31:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.19.5 with SMTP id 5mr1879511ans.156.1321371114232; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:31:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m33sm74849625ann.4.2011.11.15.07.31.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:31:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3SjXkv1d9yz2CG5m for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:31:51 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:31:50 -0500 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111115103150.04ab0e04@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <2859B9B3-0A75-40FD-B444-8885A6589A37@tandon.net> References: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> <1321350319.84509.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> <2859B9B3-0A75-40FD-B444-8885A6589A37@tandon.net> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:31:55 -0000 On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:31:49 -0500 Sahil Tandon articulated: > It was marked broken on a particular architecture, hence the genesis > of this thread. I appreciate that diagnosis is difficult; perhaps > Olli's suggestion is helpful in isolating the issue. I do not know > how else to troubleshoot since these pointyhat errors are not - AFAIK > - reproducible by others, on either i386 or amd64 platforms. It would seem to me, and please correct me if my logic is faulty here, that if the problem is ONLY reproducible on "pointyhat" and not on other systems that the problem would therefore reside with "pointyhat". Sahil, I know from time to time that you post on the "Postfix" forum. Have you tried contacting Wietse, aka "Mr Grumpy" personally and asking him for his take on the problem? -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ If you don't know the difference between a 'burro' and a 'burrow', then you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 15:33:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C45E1065670 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:33:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from decke@FreeBSD.org) Received: from groupware.itac.at (groupware.itac.at [91.205.172.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CBE8FC1C for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.bluelife.at (93.104.210.95) by groupware.itac.at (Axigen) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 06E7B4; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:18:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:18:41 +0100 From: Bernhard Froehlich To: Baptiste Daroussin In-Reply-To: <20111115150735.GA96251@azathoth.lan> References: <4EC2786E.5060907@FreeBSD.org> <20111115150735.GA96251@azathoth.lan> Message-ID: <80428c551054d45fb8717e5643867307@bluelife.at> X-Sender: decke@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.6 X-AxigenSpam-Level: 1 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B020C.4EC282D0.01AF,ss=1,fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Cc: FreeBSD Ports , Chris, Doug Barton , Rees , Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:33:49 -0000 On 15.11.2011 16:07, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:34:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? >> If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. >> I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its >> distfile (via my >> FreeBSD account). >> >> Maintaining the port should be rather easy as it can not have any >> security issues >> by definition and at the moment there is no active upstream, so no >> code changes >> are expected. >> >> P.S. Sorry that I've missed its deprecation. I haven't noticed the >> activity until >> I needed to use it at yet another system. >> > > I often use sysutils/stress don't know if that fits your needs? I've just noticed that cpuburn is gone and stress is not an alternative for my task. Why? Because I use cpuburn to verify the undervolting capabilities of AMD cpus's for sysutils/cpupowerd which needs to explicitly hammer the CPU with MMX instructions and parallel with normal CPU instructions while lowering vcore. -- Bernhard Froehlich http://www.bluelife.at/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 16:04:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8B0106566B; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:04:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD90E8FC15; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:04:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iakl21 with SMTP id l21so10661983iak.13 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:04:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=32cOE7YPV0M0Nus7F4jSoeCFOukiNcBi7OyG07ZABSc=; b=MWE8X90XzJ6M4R1ip2xUpKfVg/DSD1SJFumQ/QgBjEB9hr3508fg061l4m6I1Pbv12 I0wXfNDG+eYRAZF/rgQyUUjIzs86oiIEzQrB0i12/nhOUcdalPv22zL2gV4GftuqREXj 2KnJFDDcBDXSelRsbDB9nW0nYVjuzDid9wvLM= Received: by 10.42.41.143 with SMTP id p15mr28042749ice.9.1321373077158; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:04:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.11.140 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:04:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EC2786E.5060907@FreeBSD.org> References: <4EC2786E.5060907@FreeBSD.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:04:06 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: L9YeeadsL_nhc1ieb3lZVZDzBS8 Message-ID: To: Andriy Gapon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Ports , Baptiste Daroussin , Doug Barton , Bernhard Froehlich Subject: Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:04:38 -0000 On 15 November 2011 14:34, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? > If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. > I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its distfile= (via my > FreeBSD account). > > Maintaining the port should be rather easy as it can not have any securit= y issues > by definition and at the moment there is no active upstream, so no code c= hanges > are expected. If you can host it and maintain it, fantastic. I notice you're not a ports guy, so if if you like, feel free to send me a new url for the MASTER_SITES and I'll do the dirty work for you (no patronising intended) > P.S. Sorry that I've missed its deprecation. =A0I haven't noticed the act= ivity until > I needed to use it at yet another system. Resurrection is easy :) Thanks for helping to keep the tree in good shape. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 16:26:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246861065690; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:26:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miwi@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490F58FC15; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:26:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAFGQUg9051434; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:26:30 GMT (envelope-from miwi@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from miwi@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id pAFGQT95051428; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:26:29 GMT (envelope-from miwi) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:26:29 GMT Message-Id: <201111151626.pAFGQT95051428@freefall.freebsd.org> To: tmb_ports@maddog.u-net.com, miwi@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org From: miwi@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/16254: New port: www/cronolog X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:26:31 -0000 Synopsis: New port: www/cronolog State-Changed-From-To: closed->open State-Changed-By: miwi State-Changed-When: Tue Nov 15 16:26:29 UTC 2011 State-Changed-Why: Maintainer has approved. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=16254 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 16:51:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874421065674; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:51:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@beardz.net) Received: from svr06-mx.btshosting.co.uk (mx-2.btshosting.co.uk [178.63.196.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AABE8FC0A; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:51:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.65] (027ecff8.bb.sky.com [2.126.207.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by svr06-mx.btshosting.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1C1041B38; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:32:02 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=beardz.net; s=default; t=1321374723; bh=8sITB7Gd+NQFQfzzwwhW2MlGSQs37WDSJ/nk3nF/Zrg=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gglBCWVDgr/2REMI6eBLDHswCSOXgQACtioVLedsAU/wL2qSJthwkQ2CvyyoNzdDl hLucICqdH6gumOx4fWkYD2F0O1lJHlapVFU4rLqD5RfL08lc/3sfaxtav6I8KiXNYc qymawlUj3AbpAxFGoBGvFEX+SA7oGGpFNtzOw9no= Message-ID: <4EC293FF.2000607@beardz.net> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:31:59 +0000 From: Jase Thew User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sahil Tandon References: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> <1321350319.84509.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> <2859B9B3-0A75-40FD-B444-8885A6589A37@tandon.net> In-Reply-To: <2859B9B3-0A75-40FD-B444-8885A6589A37@tandon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "eadler@FreeBSD.org" , "swills@FreeBSD.org" , "gjb@FreeBSD.org" , "freebsd@beardz.net" , "pav@FreeBSD.org" , "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:51:34 -0000 On 15/11/2011 14:31, Sahil Tandon wrote: > It was marked broken on a particular architecture, hence the genesis of this thread. I appreciate that diagnosis is difficult; perhaps Olli's suggestion is helpful in isolating the issue. I do not know how else to troubleshoot since these pointyhat errors are not - AFAIK - reproducible by others, on either i386 or amd64 platforms. Hi all, The install is failing during a call to $wrksrc/conf/post-install. Taken from the pointyhat logs : ./postconf -d) |egrep -v '^(myhostname|mydomain|mynetworks) ' >../../conf/main.cf.default ./postconf: fatal: socket: Protocol not supported Postconf is dying with a fatal socket error. This binary is used in various places, including $wrksrc/conf/post-install. There are various tests in this post-install script that will exit with 1 should executing postconf fail for any reason. Therefore, fixing the reason for postconf throwing a fatal error will fix the build/install. What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have sufficiently different to break the socket code inside of postconf)? Regards, Jase Thew. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 16:51:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510301065744; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:51:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miwi@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287B08FC15; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAFGpnv2079801; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:51:49 GMT (envelope-from miwi@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from miwi@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id pAFGpmwe079797; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:51:48 GMT (envelope-from miwi) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:51:48 GMT Message-Id: <201111151651.pAFGpmwe079797@freefall.freebsd.org> To: tmb_ports@maddog.u-net.com, miwi@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org From: miwi@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/16254: New port: www/cronolog X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:51:49 -0000 Synopsis: New port: www/cronolog State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: miwi State-Changed-When: Tue Nov 15 16:51:48 UTC 2011 State-Changed-Why: close again was a mistake http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=16254 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 16:56:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19A6106564A; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:56:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sup.oook.cz (sup.oook.cz [94.23.0.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC2B8FC18; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:56:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.20.102] (78-136-154-58.client.ufon.cz [78.136.154.58]) (authenticated bits=0) by sup.oook.cz (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAFGu3et004009; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:56:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) From: Pav Lucistnik To: Jase Thew In-Reply-To: <4EC293FF.2000607@beardz.net> References: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> <1321350319.84509.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> <2859B9B3-0A75-40FD-B444-8885A6589A37@tandon.net> <4EC293FF.2000607@beardz.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-XiUlcpt8d9qgCA0JGdcn" Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:55:57 +0100 Message-ID: <1321376158.2315.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 94.23.0.135 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: sup.oook.cz; Sender-ip: 78.136.154.58; Sender-helo: [192.168.20.102]; ) Cc: "swills@FreeBSD.org" , "eadler@FreeBSD.org" , "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" , Sahil Tandon , "gjb@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:56:15 -0000 --=-XiUlcpt8d9qgCA0JGdcn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jase Thew p=ED=B9e v =FAt 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +0000: > What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have=20 > sufficiently different to break the socket code inside of postconf)? It is a purposefully no-networking sandbox jail. What networking activity postconf wants to run? --=20 --=20 Pav Lucistnik You have acquired a scroll entitled 'irk gleknow mizk' (n). This is an IBM Manual scroll. You are permanently confused. --=-XiUlcpt8d9qgCA0JGdcn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk7CmZkACgkQntdYP8FOsoLZEQCdEzSvXnZ6L9hd03SqnYD7+5v9 weMAnRopwXubcYYqDWyjfI2O+SS0TRDq =qZAG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-XiUlcpt8d9qgCA0JGdcn-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 17:15:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B531065690 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:15:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh1.interactivevillages.com (ca.2e.7bae.static.theplanet.com [174.123.46.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB788FC1F for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 184-78-197-203.war.clearwire-wmx.net ([184.78.197.203] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh1.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RQMIc-0003P0-7A for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:55:31 -0800 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:55:52 -0800 Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:55:52 -0800 From: Chip Camden To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111115165552.GC18788@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20111115094823.GA9461@sh4-5.1blu.de> <4EC2466B.3020808@infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8X7/QrJGcKSMr1RN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh1.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: cvs checkout ./. csup X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:15:14 -0000 --8X7/QrJGcKSMr1RN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Daniel Nebdal on Tuesday, 15 November 2011: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Matthew Seaman > wrote: > > On 15/11/2011 09:48, Matthias Apitz wrote: > >> Since many years I'm fetching or updating /usr/ports with > >> > >> # cd /usr > >> # setenv CVSROOT :pserver:anoncvs@anoncvs.fr.FreeBSD.org:/home/ncvs > >> # cvs checkout ports > >> > >> and later do the updating just with: > >> > >> # cd /usr/ports > >> # cvs update > >> # portupgrade -ai > >> > >> The FreeBSD handbook describes (or recommends?) using 'csup' for > >> updating ports tree... What is the advantage (or reason, if any)? > > > > Efficiency, basically. =A0csup should require less bandwidth and put le= ss > > load on servers than using cvs directly. =A0It works like rsync, only > > transferring the parts of the files that changed but exploiting the cvs > > revision history to produce more specific and minimal deltas than you > > can get just by using the standard rsync algorithm. > > > > However csup(1) doesn't give you any of the VCS features you'ld get by > > doing a cvs checkout -- so no simple way to diff a local copy against > > the repo, etc. etc. 'cvs checkout' of all or parts of the ports is still > > frequently preferable for developing rather than just using the ports. > > > > There are also many more cvsup servers worldwide than there are anon-cvs > > servers. > > >=20 > There's also portsnap, which has been in the base system for a while > now. It has some of the same drawbacks as csup/cvsup (no VCS > features), but is in my experience faster than them. In short, you can > use "portsnap fetch extract" to download a complete compressed tarball > of current ports and extract it, and after doing that you can use > "portsnap fetch update" to update to the current state. Read the > manpage; there are some important details. >=20 > It uses a binary patch system that's quite efficient, so if you just > want an updated /usr/ports , it's probably the fastest solution. (I > think the exact method is that "fetch" grabs a tarball if it doesn't > exist. If it does exist, it gets the binary patches required to update > it to the current state. With it in place, "extract" unpacks the > entire thing, and "update" only extracts the files touched by the last > "fetch"-command.) >=20 > It has a handbook page: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/portsnap.html >=20 In my experience, portsnap is much faster than csup for updating ports. I've tried both (at different times) updating almost daily for months at a time. --=20 =2EO. | Sterling (Chip) Camden | http://camdensoftware.com =2E.O | sterling@camdensoftware.com | http://chipsquips.com OOO | 2048R/D6DBAF91 | http://chipstips.com --8X7/QrJGcKSMr1RN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOwpmYAAoJEIpckszW26+RZuIH/jHh5NgXfWAOJwYtc7JKgYlr v++pYZvhLibVHCc/p1tUTW2RAkhmN4GVucJDZIYEeq86QMuSiLcoNT5zlRqDHgfo n5bP/MHwhUFi+OuTB//FL7v1+w/qvH8ThGrMmrWSEyIBmarVPAsSCV7sw1BLAnSu 2lnweO3506r041y2oIZiT8QpsHsreA+MVQi0ki0cQBQrYKVFGZrtPwUAseF1EEKI pv3sDn7EpbM9fsgSuS7vy14fRykMVlbibknoz9hpZFvGya84Tunn2q2DjExwx5ov gxDVb/m7DfJ1ghBLJLwO7MyvS2BddTrFAOzR5GGFlgnVwzHCnqayU57y6kl/Veo= =zD6V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8X7/QrJGcKSMr1RN-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 17:37:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D84106564A; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:37:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735338FC14; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:37:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id TAA04947; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:37:31 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4EC2A35B.8050300@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:37:31 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111003 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <4EC2786E.5060907@FreeBSD.org> <20111115150735.GA96251@azathoth.lan> In-Reply-To: <20111115150735.GA96251@azathoth.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:37:34 -0000 on 15/11/2011 17:07 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:34:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? >> If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. >> I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its distfile (via my >> FreeBSD account). >> >> Maintaining the port should be rather easy as it can not have any security issues >> by definition and at the moment there is no active upstream, so no code changes >> are expected. >> >> P.S. Sorry that I've missed its deprecation. I haven't noticed the activity until >> I needed to use it at yet another system. >> > > I often use sysutils/stress don't know if that fits your needs? I didn't know about this tool before... Unfortunately I do not see a detailed description of how exactly it loads CPU and if it does any validation/verification. cpuburn is more explicit about this and is kind of proven. Besides it has additional stuff like e.g. burnBX/burnMMX. So, I would I love to still have it. Thank you for pointing me to sysutils/stress in any case. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 17:44:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E116A106566C; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:44:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 087468FC1B; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id TAA05036; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:44:26 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4EC2A4FA.3010101@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:44:26 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111003 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4EC2786E.5060907@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:44:29 -0000 on 15/11/2011 18:04 Chris Rees said the following: > On 15 November 2011 14:34, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? >> If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. >> I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its distfile (via my >> FreeBSD account). >> >> Maintaining the port should be rather easy as it can not have any security issues >> by definition and at the moment there is no active upstream, so no code changes >> are expected. > > If you can host it and maintain it, fantastic. > > I notice you're not a ports guy, so if if you like, feel free to send > me a new url for the MASTER_SITES and I'll do the dirty work for you > (no patronising intended) It should be MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL} MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= avg once the directory is picked up by ftp-master from freefall and propagated to the mirrors (may take a while, it seems). >> P.S. Sorry that I've missed its deprecation. I haven't noticed the activity until >> I needed to use it at yet another system. > > Resurrection is easy :) Thanks for helping to keep the tree in good shape. Thank you for your help! -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 18:07:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272EC106566B; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:07:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from spartan.hamla.org (spartan.hamla.org [206.251.255.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C311F8FC14; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:07:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF2A170E5; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:07:56 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tandon.net; h= date:date:subject:subject:from:from:x-mailer:message-id :content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:received:received; s=aegis; t=1321380476; bh=M8BNQJdVTijgx59iX0w9P8lkLuBZfhmZNAUzbpVldXA=; b= JvDt1BNP3spIe8Ugxx0DVd4qV7804+uECqtjBniuSoTpUltRfPjAqFZzl+t+8Ybf apl2tCLVdb8S67/afg2TYzf3VjhA7XMHAd5Y7t40/m/FIABHTdCaIlWuzUH6wozx 0yJikh08lhNn1etlX5XqX+e6yXWYmt6CWcYv/7jMOyM= X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at spartan.hamla.org Received: from spartan.hamla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spartan.hamla.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with LMTP id Yj0SRC-GelGD; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:07:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.83.137.59] (mobile-166-137-137-074.mycingular.net [166.137.137.74]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9736C17088; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:07:55 -0500 (EST) References: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> <1321350319.84509.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> <2859B9B3-0A75-40FD-B444-8885A6589A37@tandon.net> <4EC293FF.2000607@beardz.net> <1321376158.2315.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <1321376158.2315.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Message-Id: <4B6ED3ED-AF8F-4900-B415-27603CDFE603@tandon.net> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9A405) From: Sahil Tandon Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:07:16 -0500 To: "pav@FreeBSD.org" Cc: "swills@FreeBSD.org" , Jase Thew , "eadler@FreeBSD.org" , "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" , "gjb@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:07:27 -0000 On Nov 15, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Jase Thew p=C3=AD=C5=A1e v =C3=BAt 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +0000: >=20 >> What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have=20 >> sufficiently different to break the socket code inside of postconf)? >=20 > It is a purposefully no-networking sandbox jail.=20 I have an idea; unless someone else figures it out before then, I'll take a l= ook in a few hours when I'm back in front of a computer. Thanks all for the= help.= From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 19:02:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89E6106564A for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:02:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518138FC12 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.local (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pAFJ20qL010531 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:02:00 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.1 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk pAFJ20qL010531 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1321383720; bh=E9c0lRwYboS2op6Cb6nPalyelBQOBs08E47vsWFZiuQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc; b=dx6c1vecrJL2luXug1dxOeJmhlh9B3DRsNT5A2IjdKz6lkQO60kYgxXg933oR+Ifo cDAKAm6Eo4T26d/xMCxOmGIiO48/DmHQo7dljKI605LrSAumxMZdc8T+7gzTxOTct9 4WZgW0xeunNX6oDIo1eJ9s6f75E4YfgLWYik8e3I= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163] claimed to be seedling.local Message-ID: <4EC2B720.4000605@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:01:52 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20111109124325.17efc0d1.stas@deglitch.com> <20111109222435.GD92221@azathoth.lan> <20111110110637.GA3514@hades.panopticon> <4EBCC587.10701@FreeBSD.org> <20111111100708.GA24126@hades.panopticon> <20111111124012.3ec48cb3.stas@deglitch.com> <20111111213817.GB8896@lonesome.com> <4EBD9E6F.3040708@delphij.net> <4EBDA077.5070105@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4EBDA077.5070105@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigCC1835E9E88A0FC1D396CD72" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: Recent ports removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:02:06 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigCC1835E9E88A0FC1D396CD72 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------030609050806060901070805" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030609050806060901070805 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: >> By its >> > nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, port= >> > tools like portmaster, portupgrade will not even see it because no >> > PORTREVISION bump happen. > portmaster -L will warn you about ports marked > DEPRECATED/FORBIDDEN/IGNORE/BROKEN if you run it against an updated > ports tree. One area where we actually can improve here is to also put > this information in the INDEX. I have an idea for that, just haven't > been able to put the time into making it happen. How about something like the attached? Rather than adding to the INDEX, this appends DEPRECATED, FORBIDDEN, IGNORE, BROKEN and EXPIRATION_DATE values to pkg-message, creating one if the port doesn't already have it. The duplication of echoing messages to STDOUT as well as the pkg-message file is not ideal, but displaying pkg-message at install time is not automatic when installing from ports. It might be an idea to have a standard port-install target to display ${PKGMESSAGE} if the file exists.= Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------030609050806060901070805 Content-Type: text/plain; x-mac-type="0"; x-mac-creator="0"; name="p5-FreeBSD-Portindex.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="p5-FreeBSD-Portindex.diff" Index: Makefile =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/ports-mgmt/p5-FreeBSD-Portindex/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.20 diff -u -u -r1.20 Makefile --- Makefile 29 Aug 2011 04:43:56 -0000 1.20 +++ Makefile 26 Oct 2011 08:14:43 -0000 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ # $FreeBSD: ports/ports-mgmt/p5-FreeBSD-Portindex/Makefile,v 1.20 2011/0= 8/29 04:43:56 dougb Exp $ =20 PORTNAME=3D FreeBSD-Portindex -PORTVERSION=3D 2.4 +PORTVERSION=3D 2.6 CATEGORIES=3D ports-mgmt perl5 MASTER_SITES=3D http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/portindex/ PKGNAMEPREFIX=3D p5- @@ -15,9 +15,20 @@ =20 LICENSE=3D BSD =20 +# GraphViz not required for portindex to run or generate GraphViz +# format output: this is only needed to render the output on the same +# machine. +OPTIONS=3D GRAPHVIZ "Add GraphViz run-time dependency" off + BUILD_DEPENDS=3D ${SITE_PERL}/${PERL_ARCH}/BerkeleyDB.pm:${PORTSDIR}/dat= abases/p5-BerkeleyDB RUN_DEPENDS:=3D ${BUILD_DEPENDS} =20 +.include + +.if defined(WITH_GRAPHVIZ) && !defined(WITHOUT_GRAPHVIZ) +RUN_DEPENDS+=3D dot:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/graphviz +.endif + USE_XZ=3D yes PERL_CONFIGURE=3D yes =20 Index: distinfo =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/ports-mgmt/p5-FreeBSD-Portindex/distinfo,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -u -r1.15 distinfo --- distinfo 29 Aug 2011 04:43:56 -0000 1.15 +++ distinfo 26 Oct 2011 08:14:43 -0000 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -SHA256 (FreeBSD-Portindex-2.4.tar.xz) =3D 78f461e35dcadb9fb79665c698825f= d54e081030858cf023bedfeb47b73891d0 -SIZE (FreeBSD-Portindex-2.4.tar.xz) =3D 50724 +SHA256 (FreeBSD-Portindex-2.6.tar.xz) =3D 909ea1b4ff67ea08617a54452b6ed9= e999787d6ff3458cb59fb6aa81ecc67c13 +SIZE (FreeBSD-Portindex-2.6.tar.xz) =3D 51828 Index: pkg-plist =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/ports-mgmt/p5-FreeBSD-Portindex/pkg-plist,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -u -r1.5 pkg-plist --- pkg-plist 14 Mar 2011 16:05:35 -0000 1.5 +++ pkg-plist 26 Oct 2011 08:14:43 -0000 @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ @exec [ ! -f %B/portindex.cfg ] && cp -p %B/%f %B/portindex.cfg || true %%SITE_PERL%%/FreeBSD/Portindex/Config.pm %%SITE_PERL%%/FreeBSD/Portindex/Category.pm +%%SITE_PERL%%/FreeBSD/Portindex/GraphViz.pm %%SITE_PERL%%/FreeBSD/Portindex/Port.pm %%SITE_PERL%%/FreeBSD/Portindex/Tree.pm %%SITE_PERL%%/FreeBSD/Portindex/TreeObject.pm --------------030609050806060901070805-- --------------enigCC1835E9E88A0FC1D396CD72 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7CtygACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyswgCePP5+L91lSoSr/1v6A5MHcH6V 3nEAnR2+qU8KkUVbPYir+4Q/kNlenxOS =ScGD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigCC1835E9E88A0FC1D396CD72-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 19:19:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208C6106566B for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:19:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7131C8FC12 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:19:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.local (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pAFJJGKq010759 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:19:16 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.1 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk pAFJJGKq010759 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1321384756; bh=XGnpW4Z/wCBmM471IbalfO6EGypU+DkaZOB0t1XKujc=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc; b=xLRg4QQs7jBzbJHMzp+rtgqH8VuvKPX9WFiHsDEko/TntZhZlFz/J3cYUCXOkJFuw fevvxT8UteXWCmEjShcA/OgTEs8RTUci+LKTsHEkE43R6dMUG7DVtHyGer8BY4Z4Vh 0W1gn7VFxL2ieH4c+AgNLR/o724bR0+4Mq/WQOhQ= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163] claimed to be seedling.local Message-ID: <4EC2BB2E.7060404@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:19:10 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20111109124325.17efc0d1.stas@deglitch.com> <20111109222435.GD92221@azathoth.lan> <20111110110637.GA3514@hades.panopticon> <4EBCC587.10701@FreeBSD.org> <20111111100708.GA24126@hades.panopticon> <20111111124012.3ec48cb3.stas@deglitch.com> <20111111213817.GB8896@lonesome.com> <4EBD9E6F.3040708@delphij.net> <4EBDA077.5070105@FreeBSD.org> <4EC2B720.4000605@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4EC2B720.4000605@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig30AD3C8C7F22EDB2AE64BBD8" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: Recent ports removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:19:23 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig30AD3C8C7F22EDB2AE64BBD8 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080503050607070302080206" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080503050607070302080206 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 15/11/2011 19:01, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: >>> By its >>>> nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, port= >>>> tools like portmaster, portupgrade will not even see it because no >>>> PORTREVISION bump happen. >=20 >> portmaster -L will warn you about ports marked >> DEPRECATED/FORBIDDEN/IGNORE/BROKEN if you run it against an updated >> ports tree. One area where we actually can improve here is to also put= >> this information in the INDEX. I have an idea for that, just haven't >> been able to put the time into making it happen. >=20 > How about something like the attached?=20 Ooops. Wrong diff. Like this: --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------080503050607070302080206 Content-Type: text/plain; x-mac-type="0"; x-mac-creator="0"; name="bsd.port.mk.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="bsd.port.mk.diff" Index: bsd.port.mk =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk,v retrieving revision 1.699 diff -u -u -r1.699 bsd.port.mk --- bsd.port.mk 9 Nov 2011 08:53:12 -0000 1.699 +++ bsd.port.mk 15 Nov 2011 18:59:49 -0000 @@ -4293,8 +4293,9 @@ _BUILD_SEQ=3D build-message pre-build pre-build-script do-build \ post-build post-build-script _INSTALL_DEP=3D build -_INSTALL_SEQ=3D install-message check-install-conflicts run-depends lib-= depends apply-slist pre-install \ - pre-install-script generate-plist check-already-installed +_INSTALL_SEQ=3D install-message check-install-conflicts run-depends lib-= depends \ + apply-slist deprecate-and-expire pre-install pre-install-script \ + generate-plist check-already-installed=20 _INSTALL_SUSEQ=3D check-umask install-mtree pre-su-install \ pre-su-install-script create-users-groups do-install \ install-desktop-entries install-license install-rc-script \ @@ -5615,6 +5616,34 @@ .endif .endif =20 +.if !target(deprecate-and-expire) +deprecate-and-expire: +.if defined(DEPRECATED) || defined(FORBIDDEN) || defined(BROKEN) || \ + defined(IGNORE) || defined(EXPIRATION_DATE) + @if [ -f ${_PKGMESSAGE_SAVE} -a ! -f ${PKGMESSAGE} ] ; then \ + ${CP} ${_PKGMESSAGE_SAVE} ${PKGMESSAGE} ; \ + fi +.for i in DEPRECATED FORBIDDEN BROKEN +.if defined(${i}) + @${ECHO_MSG} "=3D=3D=3D> This port is ${i}: ${${i}}" + @${ECHO_CMD} "=3D=3D=3D> This port is ${i}: ${${i}}" >> ${PKGMESSAGE} +.endif +.endfor +.if defined(IGNORE) + @${ECHO_MSG} "=3D=3D=3D> This port should have been IGNORED: ${IGNORE}= " + @${ECHO_CMD} "=3D=3D=3D> This port should have been IGNORED: ${IGNORE}= " >> \ + ${PKGMESSAGE} +.endif +.if defined(EXPIRATION_DATE) + @${ECHO_MSG} "=3D=3D=3D> EXPIRATION DATE is set to: ${EXPIRATION_DATE}= " + @${ECHO_CMD} "=3D=3D=3D> EXPIRATION DATE is set to: ${EXPIRATION_DATE}= " >> \ + ${PKGMESSAGE} +.endif +_PKGMESSAGE_SAVE :=3D ${PKGMESSAGE} +PKGMESSAGE =3D ${WRKDIR}/${_PKGMESSAGE_SAVE:T} +.endif +.endif + # Generate packing list. Also tests to make sure all required package # files exist. =20 --------------080503050607070302080206-- --------------enig30AD3C8C7F22EDB2AE64BBD8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7CuzQACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxiqACeKmJO1LLQ9zsuTayg7UXpgDUh zLAAn0Zb78Ucuk8NNjCFe3g1biYDjQ6R =rFeZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig30AD3C8C7F22EDB2AE64BBD8-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 19:26:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F49E1065672 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:26:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05AE8FC12 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywe9 with SMTP id 9so5897175ywe.13 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:26:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ogxHzRgdRyyUxGZIbI567xyeEW8XkhsOw1GOKH2A7+w=; b=JWrEnoyBWGYgMjx2W9wh22wWbstyeIiPS1G3jCoLKQn+l/q5v/ufEWInUAfrszVegM Yr9WV/NXjqk1/tUKCkxgYkpwZh+rkaSepYAGeH0QNZWjEEOFeLGz2qJGyrQrxTFqj4Az 5dfREnCXy17uVMKlREpksc9O/7XjBiwdIDvq4= Received: by 10.50.158.227 with SMTP id wx3mr29301339igb.52.1321385172157; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:26:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.11.140 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:25:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EC2BB2E.7060404@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20111109124325.17efc0d1.stas@deglitch.com> <20111109222435.GD92221@azathoth.lan> <20111110110637.GA3514@hades.panopticon> <4EBCC587.10701@FreeBSD.org> <20111111100708.GA24126@hades.panopticon> <20111111124012.3ec48cb3.stas@deglitch.com> <20111111213817.GB8896@lonesome.com> <4EBD9E6F.3040708@delphij.net> <4EBDA077.5070105@FreeBSD.org> <4EC2B720.4000605@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4EC2BB2E.7060404@infracaninophile.co.uk> From: Chris Rees Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:25:41 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: cBtjOAiHN2_XimqKHOdFt2ncpfc Message-ID: To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent ports removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:26:13 -0000 On 15 November 2011 19:19, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 15/11/2011 19:01, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: >>>> By its >>>>> nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, port >>>>> tools like portmaster, portupgrade will not even see it because no >>>>> PORTREVISION bump happen. >> >>> portmaster -L will warn you about ports marked >>> DEPRECATED/FORBIDDEN/IGNORE/BROKEN if you run it against an updated >>> ports tree. One area where we actually can improve here is to also put >>> this information in the INDEX. I have an idea for that, just haven't >>> been able to put the time into making it happen. >> >> How about something like the attached? > > Ooops. =A0Wrong diff. =A0Like this: Why have you included IGNOREd? Just curious.... Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 19:50:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334A1106564A; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:50:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A7D8FC1C; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:50:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.local (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pAFJoawE011321 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:50:36 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.1 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk pAFJoawE011321 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1321386636; bh=ReZJwraFr686juZA2of1AbIU9l9qA8pZTBASY4i6m+0=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=AAGZ9P/2MdFVs/0XJStUYjMjRCt2cxmnr5/4fWVkOfiUb3bJKTTs78OiFNtdCPHrn 8f+klIXG/PeFuwXTGCU/DzEFUTLi16zkp0aUqiThfRy+AqF852d2YIZSHOKE26d+55 VZRKxhq3WuDaPHzoKs0g8I8zh6bW6BtDE5F1So0c= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163] claimed to be seedling.local Message-ID: <4EC2C285.7090601@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:50:29 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <20111109124325.17efc0d1.stas@deglitch.com> <20111109222435.GD92221@azathoth.lan> <20111110110637.GA3514@hades.panopticon> <4EBCC587.10701@FreeBSD.org> <20111111100708.GA24126@hades.panopticon> <20111111124012.3ec48cb3.stas@deglitch.com> <20111111213817.GB8896@lonesome.com> <4EBD9E6F.3040708@delphij.net> <4EBDA077.5070105@FreeBSD.org> <4EC2B720.4000605@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4EC2BB2E.7060404@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3D0BC532F2203BDDBEBE684C" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent ports removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:50:43 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3D0BC532F2203BDDBEBE684C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 15/11/2011 19:25, Chris Rees wrote: > On 15 November 2011 19:19, Matthew Seaman > wrote: >> On 15/11/2011 19:01, Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: >>>>> By its >>>>>> nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, po= rt >>>>>> tools like portmaster, portupgrade will not even see it because no= >>>>>> PORTREVISION bump happen. >>> >>>> portmaster -L will warn you about ports marked >>>> DEPRECATED/FORBIDDEN/IGNORE/BROKEN if you run it against an updated >>>> ports tree. One area where we actually can improve here is to also p= ut >>>> this information in the INDEX. I have an idea for that, just haven't= >>>> been able to put the time into making it happen. >>> >>> How about something like the attached? >> >> Ooops. Wrong diff. Like this: >=20 > Why have you included IGNOREd? >=20 > Just curious.... A pedantic desire to cover all possibilities. It probably doesn't need to be there, but my (admittedly cursory) reading of the code suggests that by defining NO_IGNORE it could still be possible to build a pkg. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig3D0BC532F2203BDDBEBE684C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7CwowACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyWZgCfZwSPvYL5m9K5YaPUBBdMC6Ht nooAoINyaLKqlM7fVtVpufnbRY1EhGAV =EuZW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3D0BC532F2203BDDBEBE684C-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 20:00:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DA2106564A; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:00:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@passap.ru) Received: from forward15.mail.yandex.net (forward15.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6308FC14; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:00:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp14.mail.yandex.net (smtp14.mail.yandex.net [95.108.131.192]) by forward15.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 9A9B59E7D99; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:00:02 +0400 (MSK) Received: from smtp14.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp14.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 7EDDF1B603D0; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:00:02 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 46.38.32.118.tel.ru (46.38.32.118.tel.ru [46.38.32.118]) by smtp14.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id 01wSeXE9-02wqVaAL; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:00:02 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Message-ID: <4EC2C4C1.30302@passap.ru> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:00:01 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111004 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Raphael Kubo da Costa References: <4EC16E74.7040903@passap.ru> <87mxbyo0k2.fsf@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <87mxbyo0k2.fsf@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multimedia/phonon: CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:58 (if): X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:00:04 -0000 15.11.2011 01:29, Raphael Kubo da Costa пишет: > Thanks, I've just fixed this upstream and added my fix to area51 > (r7826). I'll commit it to ports as soon as I get an OK from avilla or > makc. Great, the port compiles now. Thanks! > BTW, you were supposed to get a warning instead of an error too, do you > have some special setting that raises the severity of warnings? Strange, but I don't have one. The only non-default option is that the system was built by clang. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 21:36:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641AB106566C; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:36:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (worf.ds9.tecnik93.com [81.196.207.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10AE88FC16; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (unknown [188.27.97.222]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15EA322C5490; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:36:26 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:36:14 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Zhihao Yuan Message-ID: <20111115233614.22d3984e@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/2O=ILm5KHzqHDDCkGvBLF+q"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Wen Heping , FreeBSD Ports ML , portmgr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Plan to add a bsd.pure.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:36:28 -0000 --Sig_/2O=ILm5KHzqHDDCkGvBLF+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:02:38 -0600 Zhihao Yuan wrote: > Hi, >=20 > The PR which updates all pure-* ports was passed to portmgr for a long > time, since it seem that to put a >=20 > .if defined(USE_PURE) > .include "${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.pure.mk" > .endif >=20 > In bsd.port.mk may a be better choice. Though Pure is not as popular > as some languages like PHP or Python, but it does and it will have > more ports than like Go. To include bsd.pure.mk under Mk/ can lower 2 > lines in ~20 ports (or I have to leave it under lang/pure's private > directory). How many pure ports are there ATM? --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B --Sig_/2O=ILm5KHzqHDDCkGvBLF+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk7C21kACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeXXjQCbBGpxir5v+H6M650cHLscdzVL N6oAnjMq1d254zeUG9RB+QEiNbIB4169 =5amI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/2O=ILm5KHzqHDDCkGvBLF+q-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 22:37:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED0A1065670; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:37:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lichray@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F108FC12; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:37:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so8266462eyd.13 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:37:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=eaChx3eMTSPxsgWynpstcElC/+1FQmRPrL3zBDKCmgM=; b=heRvT0iYSIXauPPqBGIlLAgNQe6i+fI9yECRwVtgqAyypgBMsYe/xed2BlvF4KC14M fRPHPNkzwQ8X1Jfb4l9G7dj9/eg1umTaX+eYvwfvfYZC3kZCVH0qvGnEhuJlqZQo0Raz Vd9YiLjMV7UG3g7QoG9yw8tJqOuFQWm0FmyLc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.35.77 with SMTP id o13mr47903ebd.19.1321396506397; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:35:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.102.17 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:35:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111115233614.22d3984e@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <20111115233614.22d3984e@it.buh.tecnik93.com> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:35:06 -0600 Message-ID: From: Zhihao Yuan To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Wen Heping , FreeBSD Ports ML , portmgr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Plan to add a bsd.pure.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:37:41 -0000 Currently, 12. Plus 3 committed, 1 unsubmitted, 3~4 planning to port. The total existing addons are listed here: http://code.google.com/p/pure-lang/wiki/Addons I probably not going to port all of them, but this list is growing. On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:02:38 -0600 > Zhihao Yuan wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The PR which updates all pure-* ports was passed to portmgr for a long > > time, since it seem that to put a > > > > .if defined(USE_PURE) > > .include "${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.pure.mk" > > .endif > > > > In bsd.port.mk may a be better choice. Though Pure is not as popular > > as some languages like PHP or Python, but it does and it will have > > more ports than like Go. To include bsd.pure.mk under Mk/ can lower 2 > > lines in ~20 ports (or I have to leave it under lang/pure's private > > directory). > > How many pure ports are there ATM? > > -- > IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" > "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" > FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B > -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___________________________________________________ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 01:56:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD9B1065675; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 01:56:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from spartan.hamla.org (spartan.hamla.org [206.251.255.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BABC8FC13; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 01:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D21170E5; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:56:29 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tandon.net; h= user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:subject:from:from:date:date:received:received; s=aegis; t=1321408589; bh=X6I6piW43gKWPPmWscDEnH2MBCpyTctOxvltmgZY2vU=; b= e/AqT/3yxhswtLUr7dV0JWCoBTQxiqtte2HhP116Y/VMtF6lAv4LogyanoYwHYsO +aI85YccuehrkTAo+eBwHH6ODhK//c5WMY6nxIchwRwgL0EMvr4ebIJ6UO4/00e9 ZpGMQwEoiHwVmTN4gguN81zg3Iw76sYaPV7BwHpONhM= X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at spartan.hamla.org Received: from spartan.hamla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spartan.hamla.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with LMTP id s4zcW73u60nI; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:56:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from magic.hamla.org (cpe-68-174-92-20.nyc.res.rr.com [68.174.92.20]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7911F17088; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:56:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:56:55 -0500 From: Sahil Tandon To: Pav Lucistnik Message-ID: <20111116015655.GB20552@magic.hamla.org> References: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> <1321350319.84509.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> <2859B9B3-0A75-40FD-B444-8885A6589A37@tandon.net> <4EC293FF.2000607@beardz.net> <1321376158.2315.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="envbJBWh7q8WU6mo" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1321376158.2315.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: "swills@FreeBSD.org" , Jase Thew , "eadler@FreeBSD.org" , "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" , "gjb@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 01:56:00 -0000 --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:55:57 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Jase Thew p=C3=AD=C5=A1e v =C3=BAt 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +0000: >=20 > > What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have=20 > > sufficiently different to break the socket code inside of postconf)? >=20 > It is a purposefully no-networking sandbox jail. What networking > activity postconf wants to run? Wietse, in a post[1] on the Postfix mailing list, lends further credence to a suspicion that this issue is particular to pointyhat: Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). I have heard about bizarre errors on FreeBSD (jail) systems where the user-land library was out of sync with kernel-land, resulting in data structure mis-matches and system calls returning nonsensical results.=20 [1] http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2011-11/0385.html --=20 Sahil Tandon --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOwxhnAAoJENvQYAHAFtl3EmsIAJGf07vExgiVZF3EaE/5R8NR I8LgpeFNMnIzVy5rH+ZFm7/otsgpaaUJE7VBior00pNPrPBFGxlbLcQBGGDPVpTv 5XJPbP+CcwdoPqqSmnwRYtBgkmf97oC1GAcJDXPdVmZE6eoSm9wha/AwIsU+Ek1F 6jEccdUGYLEHdKUZColdo1b9WSIuHATFkwXdxoF8aLVsWQu0HrD4hJype8gzBsAW JJf98Lmux5uNZ+H6DT/VmSVeJdTZ1ZHjqyvK6iyKplzzyatF56qV+Ya/cjDMU5gg RAPsjUcCVJafb7zZqvRe7aPvkpfkGZNf19/k6hUzhTZgWQROGGpBx6lgeh0xFKM= =MIpY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 06:36:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CBB9106564A for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:36:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0606B8FC12 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:36:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrouter.bsdlabs.com (mailrouter.bsdlabs.com [172.16.1.19]) by neonpark.inter-sonic.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34228284031 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:17:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailrouter.bsdlabs.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailrouter.bsdlabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFCD2C902B for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:17:00 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB Received: from mailrouter.bsdlabs.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mailrouter.bsdlabs.com (mailrouter.bsdlabs.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dQUP828hppOL for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:16:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from kreutzman.h.inter-sonic.com (kreutzman.h.inter-sonic.com [172.16.2.17]) by kreutzman.h.inter-sonic.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55C2FE04C0 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:16:59 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4EC3555B.9020706@intersonic.se> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:16:59 +0100 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111013 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: horde4-base www moved X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:36:42 -0000 Hi, I did a make deinstall/reinstall of horde4-base and to my surprise the installation placed the web accessible files in /usr/local/lib/php/pear/www/horde/ and they used to be in /usr/local/www/horde Is this intentional or did I mess anything up somewhere? I have no special options set anywhere. Thanks, From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 08:19:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63FA106564A; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:19:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622ED14E337; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4EC371F5.1050008@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:19:01 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111110 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andriy Gapon References: <4EC2786E.5060907@FreeBSD.org> <4EC2A4FA.3010101@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4EC2A4FA.3010101@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chris Rees , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:19:02 -0000 On 11/15/2011 09:44, Andriy Gapon wrote: > It should be > > MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL} > MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= avg Um, no. That's not an advantage over the previous situation, where the distfile mirror became the only working master site by default. Please provide a proper master site, or ask for help from someone who can. -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 08:20:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99CC51065675 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:20:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3B0177FD2; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:20:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4EC3724F.4030006@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:20:31 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111110 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <20111109124325.17efc0d1.stas@deglitch.com> <20111109222435.GD92221@azathoth.lan> <20111110110637.GA3514@hades.panopticon> <4EBCC587.10701@FreeBSD.org> <20111111100708.GA24126@hades.panopticon> <20111111124012.3ec48cb3.stas@deglitch.com> <20111111213817.GB8896@lonesome.com> <4EBD9E6F.3040708@delphij.net> <4EBDA077.5070105@FreeBSD.org> <4EC2B720.4000605@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4EC2B720.4000605@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent ports removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:20:37 -0000 On 11/15/2011 11:01, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: >>> By its >>>> nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, port >>>> tools like portmaster, portupgrade will not even see it because no >>>> PORTREVISION bump happen. > >> portmaster -L will warn you about ports marked >> DEPRECATED/FORBIDDEN/IGNORE/BROKEN if you run it against an updated >> ports tree. One area where we actually can improve here is to also put >> this information in the INDEX. I have an idea for that, just haven't >> been able to put the time into making it happen. > > How about something like the attached? Rather than adding to the INDEX, > this appends DEPRECATED, FORBIDDEN, IGNORE, BROKEN and EXPIRATION_DATE > values to pkg-message, creating one if the port doesn't already have it. Won't work for my use case, which is 'portmaster -L --index-only' -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 08:27:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BDD106564A; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:27:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B0B8FC0C; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:27:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iakl21 with SMTP id l21so413076iak.13 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:27:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MYIr9cjXfN1bJLTVyVBKRuNNa2xsC9mtvHAh361orK4=; b=wFuiQe4Kif4Vc2Fz1LtA0W2iD8bdYpqhVfyvwyE/ZfQBjpT16zsOABQn1I4hSTjZEC SWkCnqmVrn7ZOm4bGP8BSHfIDVdH7WoigBAWSZsV00EyrM7agmKfcCbLT6EV+4BwRUUb B8As9r74LsbPpkJk50mOA6Nk0Qk0RBISdYiQw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.63.209 with SMTP id c17mr7854436ibi.65.1321432051672; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:27:31 -0800 (PST) Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.11.140 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:27:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.11.140 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:27:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EC371F5.1050008@FreeBSD.org> References: <4EC2786E.5060907@FreeBSD.org> <4EC2A4FA.3010101@FreeBSD.org> <4EC371F5.1050008@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:27:31 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: cU6f_0RYVmgZu-uQKNPMlak2KyM Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Doug Barton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Ports , Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:27:32 -0000 On 16 Nov 2011 08:19, "Doug Barton" wrote: > > On 11/15/2011 09:44, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > It should be > > > > MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL} > > MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= avg > > Um, no. That's not an advantage over the previous situation, where the > distfile mirror became the only working master site by default. > > Please provide a proper master site, or ask for help from someone who can. > I'll provide mine. We now have a proper maintainer for the port, which was the majority of the problem. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 08:28:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E5C1065670; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:28:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B46A179EC4; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:28:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4EC3742B.9070203@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:28:27 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111110 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4EC2786E.5060907@FreeBSD.org> <4EC2A4FA.3010101@FreeBSD.org> <4EC371F5.1050008@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Ports , Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:28:29 -0000 On 11/16/2011 00:27, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 16 Nov 2011 08:19, "Doug Barton" > wrote: >> >> On 11/15/2011 09:44, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> > It should be >> > >> > MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL} >> > MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= avg >> >> Um, no. That's not an advantage over the previous situation, where the >> distfile mirror became the only working master site by default. >> >> Please provide a proper master site, or ask for help from someone who can. >> > > I'll provide mine. > > We now have a proper maintainer for the port, which was the majority of > the problem. Sounds great, thanks for volunteering. :) -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 08:43:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54CD51065670; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:43:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95208FC0A; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsd.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.59] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RQb5Z-0007lU-1u; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:43:25 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RQb5Y-0001zf-UK; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:43:24 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pAG8hOBd045288; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:43:24 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id pAG8hOxs045285; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:43:24 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:43:24 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: ale@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111116084324.GA36691@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: can't fetch math/mpfr X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:43:26 -0000 ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> License LGPL3 accepted by the user => patch02 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//mpfr-3.1.0. => Attempting to fetch http://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-current/patch02 fetch: transfer timed out => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/mpfr-3.1.0/patch02 fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/mpfr-3.1.0/patch02: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles//mpfr-3.1.0 and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/math/mpfr. Is the double slash in the path an error? -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 08:47:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3081065680; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:47:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01968FC08; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:47:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RQb9N-00008U-6b; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:47:21 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RQb9N-0007Wj-2O; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:47:21 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pAG8lKHs048476; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:47:20 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id pAG8lKuh048475; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:47:20 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:47:20 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20111116084720.GA47476@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20111116084324.GA36691@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111116084324.GA36691@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, ale@freebsd.org Subject: SOLVED: Re: can't fetch math/mpfr X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:47:22 -0000 On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:43:24AM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > ===> License LGPL3 accepted by the user > => patch02 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//mpfr-3.1.0. > => Attempting to fetch http://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-current/patch02 > fetch: transfer timed out > => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/mpfr-3.1.0/patch02 > fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/mpfr-3.1.0/patch02: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) > => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this > => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles//mpfr-3.1.0 and try again. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/math/mpfr. All is fine now. -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 08:52:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297B91065675; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870008FC1C; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:52:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pAG8qI10023904 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:52:18 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.1 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk pAG8qI10023904 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1321433539; bh=skP578ueCABY75bsGkWbBxkjZurUDnKopQrzLFFGKL8=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=VQ8mwat5Wn0qHEr5FqsWNmVnOeaCR7ogXFU/x9awhGJXQ7AUkfNZcK4m0tvbwBNQb ODQthllgV1Y+wsNeMi18QlPosPsx8rxJ6ClCsnFkJ4KhT+paDc3jao2Sft5iRDgycR fo9BUF+D2QQ62xeF45U6LRzLg2Soici0pH91TVZ8= Message-ID: <4EC379BA.1060800@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:52:10 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <20111109124325.17efc0d1.stas@deglitch.com> <20111109222435.GD92221@azathoth.lan> <20111110110637.GA3514@hades.panopticon> <4EBCC587.10701@FreeBSD.org> <20111111100708.GA24126@hades.panopticon> <20111111124012.3ec48cb3.stas@deglitch.com> <20111111213817.GB8896@lonesome.com> <4EBD9E6F.3040708@delphij.net> <4EBDA077.5070105@FreeBSD.org> <4EC2B720.4000605@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4EC3724F.4030006@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4EC3724F.4030006@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig63ECDE6EF196F387472C482F" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Recent ports removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:52:23 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig63ECDE6EF196F387472C482F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 16/11/2011 08:20, Doug Barton wrote: > On 11/15/2011 11:01, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 11/11/2011 22:23, Doug Barton wrote: >>>> By its >>>>> nature, deprecated ports tends not to be updated for long time, por= t >>>>> tools like portmaster, portupgrade will not even see it because no >>>>> PORTREVISION bump happen. >> >>> portmaster -L will warn you about ports marked >>> DEPRECATED/FORBIDDEN/IGNORE/BROKEN if you run it against an updated >>> ports tree. One area where we actually can improve here is to also pu= t >>> this information in the INDEX. I have an idea for that, just haven't >>> been able to put the time into making it happen. >> >> How about something like the attached? Rather than adding to the INDE= X, >> this appends DEPRECATED, FORBIDDEN, IGNORE, BROKEN and EXPIRATION_DATE= >> values to pkg-message, creating one if the port doesn't already have i= t. >=20 > Won't work for my use case, which is 'portmaster -L --index-only' Orthogonal to your use case: adding this sort of stuff to the INDEX is a good idea too. Not everyone uses portmaster though. Also changing the format of the INDEX has ramifications with various 3rd party software that uses it, so it's going to be some effort to get it all sorted and debugged. (BTW. Very happy to code up any proposed experimental INDEX formats in my FreeBSD::Portindex modules or receive patches.) The change I propose here is fairly minimal, and it should ensure that any user of ports or packages sees notification through mechanisms that already exist. Since they will see this at the point they install a deprecated port -- coupling that with bumping PORTREVISION at the point the port is deprecated should bring such changes to the attention of users in time for them to raise any objections / provide fixes etc. In fact, as I think about it this morning, another idea is this sort of mechanism could be used to notify users of unmaintained ports and ask for volunteers to maintain them. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig63ECDE6EF196F387472C482F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7DecEACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyLOACcDUFxS8egVYo/bpODsyAXMqGO FnQAoIpqoNk9sb92EWj9Wt8KIZp3zkQe =bfVT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig63ECDE6EF196F387472C482F-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 09:20:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589BF1065670; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:20:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9A48FC14; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id LAA17663; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:20:45 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1RQbfg-0008Mx-Rh; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:20:44 +0200 Message-ID: <4EC3806A.6080901@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:20:42 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111108 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4EC2786E.5060907@FreeBSD.org> <4EC2A4FA.3010101@FreeBSD.org> <4EC371F5.1050008@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4EC371F5.1050008@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chris Rees , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:20:48 -0000 on 16/11/2011 10:19 Doug Barton said the following: > On 11/15/2011 09:44, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> It should be >> >> MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL} >> MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= avg > > Um, no. That's not an advantage over the previous situation, where the > distfile mirror became the only working master site by default. Umm, I am not sure I understand the reasoning here, so would appreciate an explanation. I agree that this is not a great improvement over the previous status quo (except that it is now clear that the distfile is hosted by us on purpose, not by accident). But do you suggest that having is much better than just ? Because it doesn't appear to be that way to me. Thank you. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 09:28:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910C6106566B; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:28:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sup.oook.cz (sup.oook.cz [94.23.0.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6CE8FC1E; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pav.hide.vol.cz ([212.24.129.198]) (authenticated bits=0) by sup.oook.cz (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAG9S8Sb079663 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:28:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4EC38223.1090400@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:28:03 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111021 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> <1321350319.84509.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> <2859B9B3-0A75-40FD-B444-8885A6589A37@tandon.net> <4EC293FF.2000607@beardz.net> <1321376158.2315.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20111116015655.GB20552@magic.hamla.org> In-Reply-To: <20111116015655.GB20552@magic.hamla.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 94.23.0.135 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: sup.oook.cz; Sender-ip: 212.24.129.198; Sender-helo: pav.hide.vol.cz; ) Cc: "swills@FreeBSD.org" , Jase Thew , "eadler@FreeBSD.org" , Sahil Tandon , "gjb@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:28:23 -0000 On 2011/11/16 02:56, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:55:57 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > >> Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +0000: >> >>> What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have >>> sufficiently different to break the socket code inside of postconf)? >> >> It is a purposefully no-networking sandbox jail. What networking >> activity postconf wants to run? > > Wietse, in a post[1] on the Postfix mailing list, lends further credence > to a suspicion that this issue is particular to pointyhat: > > Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it > determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). > > I have heard about bizarre errors on FreeBSD (jail) systems where the > user-land library was out of sync with kernel-land, resulting in data > structure mis-matches and system calls returning nonsensical results. > > [1] http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2011-11/0385.html That's entirely possible. Is it a clever idea to hardcode local interfaces on build machine into a package that will then be redistributed to other machines? Sounds like postfix will have to do without official packages on FreeBSD from now on. -- Pav Lucistnik From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 12:07:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F212106564A for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:07:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094CE8FC18 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:07:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.113.99.167] (helo=tiny.Sisis.de.) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RQeGs-0003iQ-QD; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:07:21 +0100 Received: from tiny.Sisis.de. (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiny.Sisis.de. (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pAGC2ss0001313; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:07:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by tiny.Sisis.de. (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id pAGC2r8X001312; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:02:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: tiny.Sisis.de.: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:02:53 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111116120252.GA1298@tiny> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 82.113.99.167 Cc: marcus@freebsd.org Subject: 10-CURRENT && ports/net/wireshark does not compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:07:27 -0000 Hello, /usr/ports is uptodate as of CVS of yesterday, kernel/world are r226986; the above mentioned port does not compile, it gives: # make install =2E.. libtool: compile: cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I./../.. -I./.. -I/u= sr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/p11-kit-1 -I/usr/local/ nclude -I/usr= /local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include/pcap -I/usr/local/lib/in= clude -I/usr/include -DPLUGIN_DIR=3D\"/usr/local/l b/wireshark/plugins/1.6.= 2\" -DINET6 "-D_U_=3D__attribute__((unused))" -O2 -pipe -funit-at-a-time -f= no-strict-aliasing -Wall -W -Wextra -Wd claration-after-statement -Wendif-l= abels -Wpointer-arith -Wno-pointer-sign -Wcast-align -Wformat-security -I/u= sr/local/include -I/usr/lo al/include -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/lo= cal/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/local/include/a= tk-1.0 -I/usr local/include/cairo -I/usr/local/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/us= r/local/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/gio-unix-2.0/ -I/usr/local/i= clude -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/l= ocal/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/pcap -I/usr/local/lib/in lude -I/usr/= include -MT libdissectors_la-packet-kerberos.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libdissec= tors_la-packet-kerberos.Tpo -c packet-kerberos.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/libd= issectors_la-packet-kerberos.o packet-kerberos.c: In function 'read_keytab_file': packet-kerberos.c:653: error: 'krb5_principal_data' has no member named 'na= me' packet-kerberos.c:654: error: 'krb5_principal_data' has no member named 'na= me' packet-kerberos.c:654: error: 'krb5_principal_data' has no member named 'na= me' packet-kerberos.c:657: warning: format '%s' expects type 'char *', but argu= ment 4 has type 'krb5_data' packet-kerberos.c:657: warning: format '%s' expects type 'char *', but argu= ment 4 has type 'krb5_data' packet-kerberos.c:660: error: 'krb5_keytab_entry' has no member named 'keyb= lock' packet-kerberos.c:661: error: 'krb5_keytab_entry' has no member named 'keyb= lock' packet-kerberos.c:662: error: 'krb5_keytab_entry' has no member named 'keyb= lock' packet-kerberos.c:662: error: 'krb5_keytab_entry' has no member named 'keyb= lock' packet-kerberos.c: In function 'decrypt_krb5_data': packet-kerberos.c:702: error: 'krb5_crypto' undeclared (first use in this f= unction) packet-kerberos.c:702: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only = once packet-kerberos.c:702: error: for each function it appears in.) packet-kerberos.c:702: error: expected ';' before 'crypto' packet-kerberos.c:703: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code packet-kerberos.c:710: error: 'krb5_keytab_entry' has no member named 'keyb= lock' packet-kerberos.c:711: error: 'krb5_keytab_entry' has no member named 'keyb= lock' packet-kerberos.c:712: error: 'krb5_keytab_entry' has no member named 'keyb= lock' packet-kerberos.c:713: warning: implicit declaration of function 'krb5_cryp= to_init' packet-kerberos.c:713: error: 'krb5_keytab_entry' has no member named 'keyb= lock' packet-kerberos.c:713: error: 'crypto' undeclared (first use in this functi= on) packet-kerberos.c:725: warning: implicit declaration of function 'krb5_decr= ypt_ivec' packet-kerberos.c:735: warning: implicit declaration of function 'krb5_cryp= to_destroy' gmake[5]: *** [libdissectors_la-packet-kerberos.lo] Error 1 gmake[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/wireshark/work/wireshark-1.6.2/= epan/dissectors' gmake[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/wireshark/work/wireshark-1.6.2/= epan/dissectors' gmake[3]: *** [all] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/wireshark/work/wireshark-1.6.2/= epan/dissectors' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/wireshark/work/wireshark-1.6.2/= epan' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/wireshark/work/wireshark-1.6.2' --=20 Matthias Apitz e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 12:11:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B1A1065674 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:11:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [199.48.134.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41B748FC16 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:11:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26662 invoked by uid 0); 16 Nov 2011 07:11:17 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO glenbarber.us) (76.124.49.145) by 0 with SMTP; 16 Nov 2011 07:11:17 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:11:07 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: Pav Lucistnik Message-ID: <20111116121107.GA1207@glenbarber.us> References: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> <1321350319.84509.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> <2859B9B3-0A75-40FD-B444-8885A6589A37@tandon.net> <4EC293FF.2000607@beardz.net> <1321376158.2315.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20111116015655.GB20552@magic.hamla.org> <4EC38223.1090400@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EC38223.1090400@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Jase Thew , Sahil Tandon , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:11:18 -0000 --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:28:03AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Is it a clever idea to hardcode local interfaces on build machine into a= =20 > package that will then be redistributed to other machines? >=20 Am I misunderstanding something, or is this a local configuration script that customizes the installation for the target machine in a similar way the mai/qmail port runs post-install 'config/config-fast' scripts to identify the system hostname (which then populates the 'me' file, for example)? --=20 Glen Barber --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOw6hbAAoJEFJPDDeguUaj7VsH/jJj6hj0hfITp/tZlLSd/rj0 zetgdk8U7XS4wbogGvseuJA3lq1anATHRO2iNGIgYTtZyZoktUU0uZPxsnvUTL5f GpMoOi6d5bxj0x+PNcg5CPQMZV/q3hSIrR0F2VucawWLAT1VXABE4j384vZY0xpn H5uR0YJqQZVNfKkiCf18XKPjIx/kFb5mR4+zZ4AGrgGj2XmU+Lh8g1mP1bk9sOXv 3Rf/8+x25Loo0O8eq13BDxFyLLQdnMLaAAWfvZn36qH6tTSkmp+6YnQmfSjfPhp/ PAisMSAlwP1B/5DRZ6Subda425995mMxD6uE94PHDJTJRtkr/7ONiLSIPwm7fm4= =NPLQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 12:46:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097241065673 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:46:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC8C8FC18 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:46:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywe9 with SMTP id 9so7244368ywe.13 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 04:46:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.192.200 with SMTP id i48mr892249yhn.125.1321447587144; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 04:46:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v5sm85846302anf.3.2011.11.16.04.46.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 16 Nov 2011 04:46:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3Sk51W4b7bz2CG5m for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:46:23 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:46:23 -0500 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111116074623.57d21ec1@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4EC38223.1090400@FreeBSD.org> References: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> <1321350319.84509.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> <2859B9B3-0A75-40FD-B444-8885A6589A37@tandon.net> <4EC293FF.2000607@beardz.net> <1321376158.2315.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20111116015655.GB20552@magic.hamla.org> <4EC38223.1090400@FreeBSD.org> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:46:28 -0000 On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:28:03 +0100 Pav Lucistnik articulated: > On 2011/11/16 02:56, Sahil Tandon wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:55:57 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > >> Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +0000: > >> > >>> What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have > >>> sufficiently different to break the socket code inside of > >>> postconf)? > >> > >> It is a purposefully no-networking sandbox jail. What networking > >> activity postconf wants to run? > > > > Wietse, in a post[1] on the Postfix mailing list, lends further > > credence to a suspicion that this issue is particular to pointyhat: > > > > Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it > > determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). > > > > I have heard about bizarre errors on FreeBSD (jail) systems where > > the user-land library was out of sync with kernel-land, resulting > > in data structure mis-matches and system calls returning > > nonsensical results. > > > > [1] http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2011-11/0385.html > > That's entirely possible. > > Is it a clever idea to hardcode local interfaces on build machine > into a package that will then be redistributed to other machines? > > Sounds like postfix will have to do without official packages on > FreeBSD from now on. I would find that unacceptable. If the problem is with FreeBSD as Wietse has indicated, then the problem should be rectified on the FreeBSD side of the equation. In any case, since Postfix does apparently build on FreeBSD with the exception of "pointyhat", perhaps the "BROKEN" tag should be removed from the port and just a warning message displayed that "pointyhat" cannot build/install the port successfully but that the end users mileage may vary. At the very least, it would be a more honest approach to the problem. -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 12:52:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C735106566C for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:52:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC0CC8FC12 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1RQeyo-00088a-Lr; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:52:42 +0100 Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:52:42 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111116125242.GH68080@home.opsec.eu> References: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> <1321350319.84509.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> <2859B9B3-0A75-40FD-B444-8885A6589A37@tandon.net> <4EC293FF.2000607@beardz.net> <1321376158.2315.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20111116015655.GB20552@magic.hamla.org> <4EC38223.1090400@FreeBSD.org> <20111116074623.57d21ec1@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111116074623.57d21ec1@scorpio> Cc: wietse@porcupine.org Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:52:44 -0000 Hi! > > > Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it > > > determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). [quote http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2011-11/0385.html] > > > I have heard about bizarre errors on FreeBSD (jail) systems where > > > the user-land library was out of sync with kernel-land, resulting > > > in data structure mis-matches and system calls returning > > > nonsensical results. > > Is it a clever idea to hardcode local interfaces on build machine > > into a package that will then be redistributed to other machines? No. > > Sounds like postfix will have to do without official packages on > > FreeBSD from now on. > > I would find that unacceptable. If the problem is with FreeBSD as > Wietse has indicated, then the problem should be rectified on the > FreeBSD side of the equation. Well, the problem is on both sides. On FreeBSD, one can have "systems" without any interface -- and postfix assumes that every system it is built on has some kind of interface. So, maybe it's time to change that assumption for the postfix built process, if possible ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 9 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 13:03:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB231065670 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:03:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wietse@porcupine.org) Received: from spike.porcupine.org (spike.porcupine.org [IPv6:2604:8d00:189::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B038FC13 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by spike.porcupine.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3Sk5Nt4sX9zk2RT; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:03:10 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=porcupine.org; s=dktest; t=1321448590; bh=/ww3u6UkYSq9jEu8XqaaOchTBFJxjowCeTISK1zPEuw=; h=Subject:In-Reply-To:To:Date:Sender:From:CC:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Message-Id; b=N9apcv9vL/KmGUzxZxDQvnU0DeLY2xWHJwbKI/yRMJUlrHTup7Tq85JJhgBDlokBL fj7OivUut9xhQKSXLt7/AlAUJEe4FhlQH8puYhEkuCHcmf1Dmh5GVrwT2D5yK0RV1q l68XQOGFB5toL8k8rI7VwAU6a7Ci7hmrqP50rAMo= In-Reply-To: <20111116125242.GH68080@home.opsec.eu> To: Kurt Jaeger Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:03:10 -0500 (EST) Sender: wietse@porcupine.org From: Wietse Venema X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124d (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-Id: <3Sk5Nt4sX9zk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> Cc: wietse@porcupine.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:03:12 -0000 Kurt Jaeger: > Hi! > > > > > Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it > > > > determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). > > [quote > http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2011-11/0385.html] > > > > I have heard about bizarre errors on FreeBSD (jail) systems where > > > > the user-land library was out of sync with kernel-land, resulting > > > > in data structure mis-matches and system calls returning > > > > nonsensical results. > > > > Is it a clever idea to hardcode local interfaces on build machine > > > into a package that will then be redistributed to other machines? > > No. Postfix does none of that. Can someone please explain what socket call is failing, and what the reasons for that might be? I tend to believe that network-less build environments are not representative for the environment where an Internet MTA would run, but hey, what do I know. Wietse From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 13:18:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7FE10656A6 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:18:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 570078FC16 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:18:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2011 13:18:44 -0000 Received: from hu5.abaxx.de (EHLO [10.6.25.100]) [213.61.170.110] by mail.gmx.net (mp023) with SMTP; 16 Nov 2011 14:18:44 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1956535 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18PZN96o5QPBKSPfsisVdSjOWhViFJWrk7OgrDhnU IJIgNl5p8uT3pz Message-ID: <4EC3B832.4020004@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:18:42 +0100 From: olli hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> <1321350319.84509.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> <2859B9B3-0A75-40FD-B444-8885A6589A37@tandon.net> <4EC293FF.2000607@beardz.net> <1321376158.2315.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20111116015655.GB20552@magic.hamla.org> <4EC38223.1090400@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4EC38223.1090400@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050404040604040501090605" X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: "eadler@FreeBSD.org" , "swills@FreeBSD.org" , Sahil Tandon , "gjb@FreeBSD.org" , Jase Thew , Pav Lucistnik Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:18:48 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050404040604040501090605 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2011-11-16 10:28, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > On 2011/11/16 02:56, Sahil Tandon wrote: >> On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:55:57 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: >> >>> Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +0000: >>> >>>> What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have >>>> sufficiently different to break the socket code inside of postconf)? >>> >>> It is a purposefully no-networking sandbox jail. What networking >>> activity postconf wants to run? >> >> Wietse, in a post[1] on the Postfix mailing list, lends further credence >> to a suspicion that this issue is particular to pointyhat: >> >> Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it >> determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). >> >> I have heard about bizarre errors on FreeBSD (jail) systems where the >> user-land library was out of sync with kernel-land, resulting in data >> structure mis-matches and system calls returning nonsensical results. >> >> [1] http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2011-11/0385.html > > That's entirely possible. > > Is it a clever idea to hardcode local interfaces on build machine into a package that will then be redistributed to other machines? > > Sounds like postfix will have to do without official packages on FreeBSD from now on. What about the attached diff until we found the exact issue. Unbreak the port, and use MANUAL_PACKAGE_BUILD instead. Additional bump to latest postfix-current. Since postfix-current should be current and not months behind I see no issue if we do not provide packages which are not updated regularly enough to reflect current. -- Regards, olli --------------050404040604040501090605 Content-Type: text/plain; name="postfix-current.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="postfix-current.diff" SW5kZXg6IE1ha2VmaWxlDQo9PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09DQpSQ1MgZmlsZTogL2hvbWUvcGN2cy9w b3J0cy9tYWlsL3Bvc3RmaXgtY3VycmVudC9NYWtlZmlsZSx2DQpyZXRyaWV2aW5nIHJldmlz aW9uIDEuMjYzDQpkaWZmIC11IC1yMS4yNjMgTWFrZWZpbGUNCi0tLSBNYWtlZmlsZQkyNiBP Y3QgMjAxMSAyMjo0NDo1MCAtMDAwMAkxLjI2Mw0KKysrIE1ha2VmaWxlCTE2IE5vdiAyMDEx IDEzOjExOjAzIC0wMDAwDQpAQCAtNiw3ICs2LDcgQEANCiAjDQogDQogUE9SVE5BTUU9CXBv c3RmaXgNCi1ESVNUVkVSU0lPTj0JMi45LTIwMTExMDEyDQorRElTVFZFUlNJT049CTIuOS0y MDExMTExMw0KIFBPUlRFUE9DSD0JNA0KIENBVEVHT1JJRVM9CW1haWwgaXB2Ng0KIE1BU1RF Ul9TSVRFUz0JZnRwOi8vZnRwLnBvcmN1cGluZS5vcmcvbWlycm9ycy9wb3N0Zml4LXJlbGVh c2UvZXhwZXJpbWVudGFsLyBcDQpAQCAtMjUsNiArMjUsNyBAQA0KIAkJcG9zdGZpeC1jdXJy ZW50LTIuWzAtOF0qIHBvc3RmaXgtY3VycmVudC1iYXNlLTIuWzAtOF0qIFwNCiAJCXNlbmRt YWlsLTguKiBzZW5kbWFpbCsqLTguKiBzbWFpbC0zLiogem1haWxlci0yLioNCiANCitNQU5V QUxfUEFDS0FHRV9CVUlMRD0JYnVpbGQgT0sgaW4gdGluZGVyYm94LCBicm9rZW4gb24gcG9p bnR5aGF0IChpc3N1ZSBub3QgaWRlbnRpZmllZCkNCiAuaWYgIWRlZmluZWQoQkFUQ0gpICYm ICFkZWZpbmVkKFBBQ0tBR0VfQlVJTERJTkcpDQogSVNfSU5URVJBQ1RJVkU9CXllcw0KIC5l bmRpZg0KQEAgLTkyLDEwICs5Myw2IEBADQogSFRNTDE9CWJvZHlfY2hlY2tzLjUuaHRtbCBi b3VuY2UuNS5odG1sIHBvc3RmaXgtcG93ZXIucG5nIFwNCiAJc2NhY2hlLjguaHRtbCB0bHNt Z3IuOC5odG1sDQogDQotLmlmICR7QVJDSH0gPT0gImFtZDY0Ig0KLUJST0tFTj0JCWZhaWxz IGR1cmluZyBpbnN0YWxsYXRpb24NCi0uZW5kaWYNCi0NCiAuaWYgIWRlZmluZWQoREVCVUcp DQogTUFLRUZJTEVGTEFHUys9CURFQlVHPQ0KIC5lbmRpZg0KSW5kZXg6IGRpc3RpbmZvDQo9 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09DQpSQ1MgZmlsZTogL2hvbWUvcGN2cy9wb3J0cy9tYWlsL3Bvc3RmaXgt Y3VycmVudC9kaXN0aW5mbyx2DQpyZXRyaWV2aW5nIHJldmlzaW9uIDEuMTk2DQpkaWZmIC11 IC1yMS4xOTYgZGlzdGluZm8NCi0tLSBkaXN0aW5mbwkxOCBPY3QgMjAxMSAwMTo1MDo0MSAt MDAwMAkxLjE5Ng0KKysrIGRpc3RpbmZvCTE2IE5vdiAyMDExIDEzOjExOjAzIC0wMDAwDQpA QCAtMSwyICsxLDIgQEANCi1TSEEyNTYgKHBvc3RmaXgvcG9zdGZpeC0yLjktMjAxMTEwMTIu dGFyLmd6KSA9IGZiM2Q1NWM4YTE2YzY4N2JjZWU3ZTdhMjZhODRjNjllODc2NWNjMTliYTdh YjQ3NjIwZTdhYzZiMTllZmQzYmUNCi1TSVpFIChwb3N0Zml4L3Bvc3RmaXgtMi45LTIwMTEx MDEyLnRhci5neikgPSAzNjczNTk2DQorU0hBMjU2IChwb3N0Zml4L3Bvc3RmaXgtMi45LTIw MTExMTEzLnRhci5neikgPSBjOGY0OTNiOTIwNmI0YWM1MmZkZmRhZTcyZmVlMjE0ZDIyZDI5 MjA2ZDM1M2E2MTEwMTg4MzA1MDE5ZDkwNmUzDQorU0laRSAocG9zdGZpeC9wb3N0Zml4LTIu OS0yMDExMTExMy50YXIuZ3opID0gMzY4NTQ1MA0K --------------050404040604040501090605-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 14:02:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35C8106564A for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:02:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A68C8FC17 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:02:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1RQg4F-0009HX-9e; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:02:23 +0100 Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:02:23 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Wietse Venema Message-ID: <20111116140223.GI68080@home.opsec.eu> References: <20111116125242.GH68080@home.opsec.eu> <3Sk5Nt4sX9zk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3Sk5Nt4sX9zk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:02:22 -0000 Hi! > > > > > Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it > > > > > determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). [...] > Postfix does none of that. The fbsd postfix-current port during the post-install script does something which fails on a jail-based build-cluster where the jail itself has no network connectivity. See this message for some analysis: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-November/071419.html And this message explains it: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-November/071421.html It says: ---------- It is a purposefully no-networking sandbox jail. What networking activity postconf wants to run? ---------- > Can someone please explain what socket call is failing, and what > the reasons for that might be? The reason is that postconf is called during post-install and fails because the build jail is without any interface. > I tend to believe that network-less build environments are not > representative for the environment where an Internet MTA would run, > but hey, what do I know. The build environment seems to be network-less. It's not the environment where the package will run. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 9 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 14:34:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CA3106564A; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:34:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sup.oook.cz (sup.oook.cz [94.23.0.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3018B8FC08; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pav.hide.vol.cz ([212.24.129.198]) (authenticated bits=0) by sup.oook.cz (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAGEYVMO002663 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:34:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4EC3C9F2.2060606@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:34:26 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111021 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: olli hauer References: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> <1321350319.84509.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> <2859B9B3-0A75-40FD-B444-8885A6589A37@tandon.net> <4EC293FF.2000607@beardz.net> <1321376158.2315.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20111116015655.GB20552@magic.hamla.org> <4EC38223.1090400@FreeBSD.org> <4EC3B832.4020004@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4EC3B832.4020004@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 94.23.0.135 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: sup.oook.cz; Sender-ip: 212.24.129.198; Sender-helo: pav.hide.vol.cz; ) Cc: "eadler@FreeBSD.org" , "swills@FreeBSD.org" , Sahil Tandon , "gjb@FreeBSD.org" , Jase Thew , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:34:36 -0000 On 2011/11/16 14:18, olli hauer wrote: > On 2011-11-16 10:28, Pav Lucistnik wrote: >> On 2011/11/16 02:56, Sahil Tandon wrote: >>> On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 17:55:57 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: >>> >>>> Jase Thew píše v út 15. 11. 2011 v 16:31 +0000: >>>> >>>>> What networking/DNS configuration is Pointyhat lacking (or have >>>>> sufficiently different to break the socket code inside of postconf)? >>>> >>>> It is a purposefully no-networking sandbox jail. What networking >>>> activity postconf wants to run? >>> >>> Wietse, in a post[1] on the Postfix mailing list, lends further credence >>> to a suspicion that this issue is particular to pointyhat: >>> >>> Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it >>> determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). >>> >>> I have heard about bizarre errors on FreeBSD (jail) systems where the >>> user-land library was out of sync with kernel-land, resulting in data >>> structure mis-matches and system calls returning nonsensical results. >>> >>> [1] http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2011-11/0385.html >> >> That's entirely possible. >> >> Is it a clever idea to hardcode local interfaces on build machine into a package that will then be redistributed to other machines? >> >> Sounds like postfix will have to do without official packages on FreeBSD from now on. > > > What about the attached diff until we found the exact issue. > > Unbreak the port, and use MANUAL_PACKAGE_BUILD instead. MANUAL_PACKAGE_BUILD is fine with me. -- Pav Lucistnik From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 16:00:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33994106564A for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:00:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wietse@porcupine.org) Received: from spike.porcupine.org (spike.porcupine.org [IPv6:2604:8d00:189::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3AA08FC0A for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by spike.porcupine.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3Sk9KR4s2czk2RT; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:00:27 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=porcupine.org; s=dktest; t=1321459227; bh=KEkyDao7qbhVSR26SgD7BkDLuFOsZuNpVWzKEdAZ1jY=; h=Subject:In-Reply-To:To:Date:Sender:From:CC:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Message-Id; b=zekVwGDZH3oq4oviULoiOQ8WmFI0QXuMt5WqbS/xqV9+YtJt7PtkZd84kecnmWL2+ TyjoOciwzdALTQNsEuk3HWEJHiKNh40NpnXP6B4UxwpWBNX+1fidSaaWSm9KbpG8d3 DM5fsNC3ltkNHjrSMA9SZ9V4+CsjCXk6oMdHAmAI= In-Reply-To: <20111116140223.GI68080@home.opsec.eu> To: Kurt Jaeger Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:00:27 -0500 (EST) Sender: wietse@porcupine.org From: Wietse Venema X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124d (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-Id: <3Sk9KR4s2czk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Wietse Venema Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:00:34 -0000 Kurt Jaeger: > Hi! > > > > > > > Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it > > > > > > determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). > [...] > > Postfix does none of that. > > The fbsd postfix-current port during the post-install script does > something which fails on a jail-based build-cluster where the > jail itself has no network connectivity. Would it be possible to give the jail a loopback interface? I don't mind if FreeBSD improves its build environment such that it breaks the build after 12 years. If adding a loopback interface fixes this, then we can all move on to more interesting things. Wietse From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 16:08:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E501065689 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:08:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (dns1.vizion2000.net [62.49.197.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A34D08FC21 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:08:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 79675119C53; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:07:17 -0800 (PST) From: David Southwell Organization: Vision Communications To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:07:17 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-RELEASE; KDE/4.7.2; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201111160707.17270.david@vizion2000.net> Subject: science/avogadro compile failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:08:53 -0000 avogadro fails with the error reports shown below. Thanks in advance for any guidance David Scanning dependencies of target avogadro-app [ 90%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/editcommands.cpp.o [ 90%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/projecttreeitem.cpp.o [ 90%] Building C object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/__/gl2ps/gl2ps.c.o [ 91%] Building CXX object libavogadro/src/python/CMakeFiles/python- module.dir/moleculefile.cpp.o [ 91%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/projectdelegates/atomdelegate.cpp.o [ 91%] Building CXX object libavogadro/src/python/CMakeFiles/python- module.dir/toolgroup.cpp.o [ 91%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/projectdelegates/bonddelegate.cpp.o [ 92%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/projectdelegates/labeldelegate.cpp.o [ 92%] Building CXX object libavogadro/src/python/CMakeFiles/python- module.dir/pluginmanager.cpp.o [ 92%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/projectdelegates/moleculedelegate.cpp.o [ 92%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/projectdelegates/residuedelegate.cpp.o [ 92%] Building CXX object libavogadro/src/python/CMakeFiles/python- module.dir/cube.cpp.o [ 92%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/projectdelegates/selectiondelegate.cpp.o [ 92%] Building CXX object libavogadro/src/python/CMakeFiles/python- module.dir/atom.cpp.o [ 92%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/projecttreemodel.cpp.o [ 93%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/projecttreemodeldelegate.cpp.o [ 93%] Building CXX object libavogadro/src/python/CMakeFiles/python- module.dir/elementtranslator.cpp.o [ 93%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/pluginitemmodel.cpp.o [ 93%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/flattabwidget.cpp.o [ 93%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/engineitemdelegate.cpp.o [ 94%] Building CXX object libavogadro/src/python/CMakeFiles/python- module.dir/eigen.cpp.o [ 94%] Building CXX object libavogadro/src/python/CMakeFiles/python- module.dir/tool.cpp.o [ 94%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/engineitemmodel.cpp.o [ 94%] Building CXX object libavogadro/src/python/CMakeFiles/python- module.dir/periodictableview.cpp.o [ 94%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/engineviewwidget.cpp.o [ 94%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/primitiveitemmodel.cpp.o [ 94%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/aboutdialog.cpp.o [ 94%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/pluginlistview.cpp.o [ 94%] Building CXX object libavogadro/src/python/CMakeFiles/python- module.dir/primitivelist.cpp.o [ 94%] Building CXX object libavogadro/src/python/CMakeFiles/python- module.dir/camera.cpp.o [ 94%] Building CXX object libavogadro/src/python/CMakeFiles/python- module.dir/sip.cpp.o [ 95%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/detachedview.cpp.o [ 95%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/glgraphicsview.cpp.o /usr/ports/science/avogadro/work/avogadro-1.0.1/libavogadro/src/python/sip.cpp: In static member function 'static void* QClass_converters::QClass_from_PyQt(PyObject*)': /usr/ports/science/avogadro/work/avogadro-1.0.1/libavogadro/src/python/sip.cpp:207: error: 'struct sipSimpleWrapper' has no member named 'u' [ 95%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/enginelistview.cpp.o *** Error code 1 [ 95%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/primitivetreeview.cpp.o [ 95%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/enginecolorswidget.cpp.o [ 95%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/projecttreeeditor.cpp.o 1 error *** Error code 2 [ 95%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/application.cpp.o [ 95%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro-app.dir/main.cpp.o [ 95%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/savedialog.cpp.o [ 96%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/addenginedialog.cpp.o [ 96%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/pluginsettings.cpp.o [ 96%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/settingsdialog.cpp.o [ 97%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/engineprimitiveswidget.cpp.o [ 97%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/importdialog.cpp.o [ 98%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/mainwindow.cpp.o [ 98%] Building CXX object avogadro/src/CMakeFiles/avogadro- app.dir/qrc_avogadro.cxx.o Linking CXX executable ../../bin/avogadro [ 98%] Built target avogadro-app 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/science/avogadro. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/science/avogadro. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 16:24:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685A01065678; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD36C8FC0C; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:24:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnk3 with SMTP id k3so12860782ggn.13 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:24:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=h0JY8tRIR6NHtFz3zekfr8VmZcS21B5fquvz6fesgFM=; b=FSK75dbYj3/DbtC98h4+BTx6WKt1KPPHjDd2U74iwEBcbIc2aFALiusfK2RD9p04SN nqLiIR7bXIvHxEhOmKpGW/zcqMED6vvBXe7HV4TobIBPMJz1IBFVUKzt1Nb5oG+Vf4TG hDZ38czg8LkK2gwqGA/z9KkRdlmQULZ/HSmns= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.104.137 with SMTP id ge9mr32940479igb.38.1321460663622; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:24:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.11.140 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:24:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.11.140 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:24:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3Sk9KR4s2czk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> References: <20111116140223.GI68080@home.opsec.eu> <3Sk9KR4s2czk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:24:23 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Wietse Venema Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Kurt Jaeger , Renato Botelho , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:24:25 -0000 On 16 Nov 2011 16:00, "Wietse Venema" wrote: > > Kurt Jaeger: > > Hi! > > > > > > > > > Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value (it > > > > > > > determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). > > [...] > > > Postfix does none of that. > > > > The fbsd postfix-current port during the post-install script does > > something which fails on a jail-based build-cluster where the > > jail itself has no network connectivity. > > Would it be possible to give the jail a loopback interface? > > I don't mind if FreeBSD improves its build environment such that > it breaks the build after 12 years. If adding a loopback interface > fixes this, then we can all move on to more interesting things. > > Wietse > Clamav uses loopback on its testing phase, and works fine on the build cluster. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 16:37:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F601065670 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:37:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from spartan.hamla.org (spartan.hamla.org [206.251.255.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0240D8FC08 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:37:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAFCE170E5; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:37:34 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tandon.net; h= date:date:subject:subject:from:from:x-mailer:message-id :content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:received:received; s=aegis; t=1321461454; bh=UQrwb4n9bKaWvCleyzdKcY2NKJXQiwg5Pm+PaGJTfKA=; b= Xn4ZHBv9bT7KdC31238seaRCdZ6a7b5dmzVS+5gcjoFL+uAFKURsC9yAzPK4vmCI m/tgkk7ndVmtgJgo5gjoPp4c5m97FyaPGDm6IIsjnWUIxxWa0QRO5Z9Xa31Rdo+h NrUywgwjus31sVfJukOg5oqY0S3yJjk/ibY/53D+ru8= X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at spartan.hamla.org Received: from spartan.hamla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spartan.hamla.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with LMTP id OQoBuqj2Peyd; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:37:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.45.153.126] (mobile-166-137-136-107.mycingular.net [166.137.136.107]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62FE217042; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:37:33 -0500 (EST) References: <20111116140223.GI68080@home.opsec.eu> <3Sk9KR4s2czk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <837B0CE2-F5DE-4D75-9FAE-044574D00E30@tandon.net> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9A405) From: Sahil Tandon Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:36:57 -0500 To: Chris Rees Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , Kurt Jaeger , Renato Botelho , Wietse Venema Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:37:05 -0000 On Nov 16, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > On 16 Nov 2011 16:00, "Wietse Venema" wrote: >>=20 >> Kurt Jaeger: >>> Hi! >>>=20 >>>>>>>> Postconf opens a socket to determine the mynetworks value > (it >>>>>>>> determines the local interfaces and their netmasks). >>> [...] >>>> Postfix does none of that. >>>=20 >>> The fbsd postfix-current port during the post-install script does >>> something which fails on a jail-based build-cluster where the >>> jail itself has no network connectivity. >>=20 >> Would it be possible to give the jail a loopback interface? >>=20 >> I don't mind if FreeBSD improves its build environment such that >> it breaks the build after 12 years. If adding a loopback interface >> fixes this, then we can all move on to more interesting things. >>=20 >> Wietse >>=20 >=20 > Clamav uses loopback on its testing phase, and works fine on the build > cluster. What irks me is that all other Postfix versions (that also call postconf) ha= ve no problem building/installing on the cluster.= From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 18:16:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413941065670; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:16:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wietse@porcupine.org) Received: from spike.porcupine.org (spike.porcupine.org [IPv6:2604:8d00:189::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E0C8FC16; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by spike.porcupine.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3SkDLV1vVVzk2RT; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:16:34 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=porcupine.org; s=dktest; t=1321467394; bh=8RrhequJHspWNGrSs/GK/mFKYUufcqkbITxV0LTlF+M=; h=Subject:In-Reply-To:To:Date:Sender:From:CC:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Message-Id; b=OMORbCeVXKCYLCfv+1plAH9ThkJd/7zJj9gK9fR9D37ZjGvFyzLHzvovsrSSAdfeA HOUp2h+Ou8Z6F7g8dr7dDRMDHjCGPR9POvqcYwLzcNxOJmu/60gMLaNJ2pTBEugQkj Z3Et2b8p2VK3pIEhg8fTCHeEptotYi0YAYmvk8WM= In-Reply-To: <837B0CE2-F5DE-4D75-9FAE-044574D00E30@tandon.net> To: Sahil Tandon Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:16:34 -0500 (EST) Sender: wietse@porcupine.org From: Wietse Venema X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124d (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-Id: <3SkDLV1vVVzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> Cc: Renato Botelho , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , Kurt Jaeger , Wietse Venema , Chris Rees Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:16:35 -0000 Wietse: > Would it be possible to give the jail a loopback interface? > > I don't mind if FreeBSD improves its build environment such that > it breaks the build after 12 years. If adding a loopback interface > fixes this, then we can all move on to more interesting things. On Nov 16, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > Clamav uses loopback on its testing phase, and works fine on the build > cluster. Sahil Tandon: > What irks me is that all other Postfix versions (that also call > postconf) have no problem building/installing on the cluster. It would be immensely helpful if run-time details could be made available including line of source code, and any system configuration details that are necessary to reproduce the condition. If this turns out to be highly-classified information, then we can communicate off-list. My PGP key is linked off http://www.porcupine.org/wietse/. Wietse From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 19:53:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6CE41065673; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:53:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de) Received: from smtp.kn-bremen.de (gelbbaer.kn-bremen.de [78.46.108.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F688FC0A; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:53:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kn-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id A32EE1E000C6; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:53:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from triton8.kn-bremen.de (noident@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by triton8.kn-bremen.de (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pAGJpSFU057249; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:51:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nox@triton8.kn-bremen.de) Received: (from nox@localhost) by triton8.kn-bremen.de (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id pAGJpSOU057248; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:51:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nox) From: Juergen Lock Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:51:28 +0100 To: freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20111116195128.GA54448@triton8.kn-bremen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Subject: ardour3 beta1 (use a midi keyboard with FreeBSD...) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:53:41 -0000 Hi! I still haven't got around to porting lv2 ui and more plugins (help highly welcome there :) - but after the ardour guys posted a beta1 release of ardour3, http://ardour.org/node/4658 I prepared another port update: http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/ardour-3.0beta1-preliminary-r10637.patch As posted earlier, this depends on an lv2core port change, http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/lv2core-lv2config.patch as well as lilv, serd, and sord: http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/serd-0.5.0.shar http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/sord-0.5.0.shar http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/lilv-0.5.0r3601.shar Here are some (hopefully) useful links again: http://ardour.org/a3_features http://ardour.org/a3_features_midi http://ardour.org/a3_features_midi_editing http://ardour.org/plugins http://www.archive.org/details/Introduction_to_Ardour_3.0_MIDI My original ardour3 alpha10 thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-multimedia/2011-September/012432.html I tested this with qjackctl, jack_umidi, and fluidsynth, as well as with linuxsampler, here is a blog post about linuxsampler, including about using it as an lv2 plugin with ardour3: (the LV2CORE knob with the audio/linuxsampler port) http://wootangent.net/2011/07/everything-you-always-wanted-to-know-about-linuxsampler/ The mentioned linuxsampler frontend gui that you can run with java -jar: http://linuxsampler.org/downloads.html http://downloads.sourceforge.net/jsampler/Fantasia-0.9.jar And a piano bank .gig (Maestro Concert Grand) that you can use with linuxsampler: http://sonimusicae.free.fr/matshelgesson-maestro-en.html TODO: - Test (and possibly fix) the VST stuff (it uses wine and thus probably only works on i386 and I'm on amd64 so I didn't attempt to build it.) - Maybe fix the port so it respects C{,XX}FLAGS? (it now uses waf which seems to ignore them.) - Installation is not really supported yet by the ardour guys for the betas so there may be files not getting installed, if you notice something missing you can run the build from below the work/ dir by invoking: (also without installing the port, i.e. after just doing `make' in the port dir not `make install') work/ardour-3.0alpha10_10000/gtk2_ardour/ardev - Test! (are the Ardour devs interested in FreeBSD bugreports? I don't know. :) What I do know is they don't want the alphas/betas discussed in their webforums, quote: -------snip----------- This is a beta version of Ardour 3.0. You are respectfully requested NOT to ask for assistance with build issues and not to report issues with Ardour 3.0 on the forums at ardour.org. Please use IRC, the bug tracker and/or the ardour mailing lists (-dev or -user) Thanks for your co-operation with our development process. -------snip----------- Enjoy, :) Juergen PS: The export function in the gui doesn't work for midi tracks, but you can fork a track and after that grab a midi file out of: /interchange//midifiles From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 21:47:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A4A01065672; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:47:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeremie@le-hen.org) Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (smtp5-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F0B8FC1E; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:47:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from endor.tataz.chchile.org (unknown [82.233.239.98]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C655D4836E; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:47:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from felucia.tataz.chchile.org (felucia.tataz.chchile.org [192.168.1.9]) by endor.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EEB7B72; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:47:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by felucia.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 45C3713433; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:47:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:47:19 +0100 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20111116214718.GD11894@felucia.tataz.chchile.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: sunpoet@FreeBSD.org, jeremie@le-hen.org Subject: [sysutils/pwsafe] Useless X11 dependency X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:47:30 -0000 Hi, Pleaese Cc: me when replying, I'm not subscribed. I'm using sysutils/pwsafe on a headless server. My recent upgrade of the port pulled in numerous useless X11 libs. - The port doesn't seem to agree to issue the password on the terminal anymore; - The port compiles cleanly when the Makefile is reverted to rev 1.4. Can you please revert your change, or at least provide a WITHOUT_X11 knob as many other ports? Thanks. Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen Men are born free and equal. Later on, they're on their own. Jean Yanne From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 21:59:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED7A106564A for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:59:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepo201.cox.net (eastrmfepo201.cox.net [68.230.241.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67BA28FC14 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:59:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo306.cox.net ([68.230.241.238]) by eastrmfepo201.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20111116215931.BSOL4752.eastrmfepo201.cox.net@eastrmimpo306.cox.net>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:59:31 -0500 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.86.236]) by eastrmimpo306.cox.net with bizsmtp id xxzW1h00c55wwzE02xzWvL; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:59:31 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020209.4EC43243.0048,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=sGR9G2hYIFXa2xB4aZiX1SVRJ2zjCAfsdSGqvGTS29E= c=1 sm=1 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=uAbGmPAyUfLL1M3oYAsfuA==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=1nrbeWX0AHh4eKlUcCwA:9 a=aVWRlX4Tf53J16TWqCsA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=x0uADENsyE8A:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=uAbGmPAyUfLL1M3oYAsfuA==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pAGLxTI6093971; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:59:30 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:59:24 -0600 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: Matthias Apitz Message-ID: <20111116155924.00c6a41f@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20111115094823.GA9461@sh4-5.1blu.de> References: <20111115094823.GA9461@sh4-5.1blu.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs checkout ./. csup X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:59:37 -0000 On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:48:26 +0100 Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Since many years I'm fetching or updating /usr/ports with > > # cd /usr > # setenv CVSROOT :pserver:anoncvs@anoncvs.fr.FreeBSD.org:/home/ncvs > # cvs checkout ports > > and later do the updating just with: > > # cd /usr/ports > # cvs update > # portupgrade -ai > > The FreeBSD handbook describes (or recommends?) using 'csup' for > updating ports tree... What is the advantage (or reason, if any)? Basically, for doing updates across the network, csup is the preferred method (for reasons of efficiency and less strain on the server). If you do need the versioning information provided by CVS (for example, to create a diff to submit for a ports patch, or simply for convenient access to the CVS history of a particular file), then you may want to try the following method: Use csup to maintain a local copy (default directory /home/ncvs) of the parts of the CVS repo you need (src, ports, doc, etc.), using a modified copy of /usr/share/examples/cvsup/cvs-supfile. You'll probably want to setup a cron job to do this automatically at regular intervals. Then use cvs to update your /usr/{src,ports,doc} trees from your local copy of the CVS repo. Note that having a local CVS repo also eliminates the need to use the pserver access method, if you're updating on the same machine where the repo resides. If you decide to do this, you'll need to remove your current working {src,ports,doc} tree(s) and then do a 'cvs checkout' the first time to setup the CVS-versioned tree(s). For example: export CVSROOT=/home/ncvs cd /usr rm -rf ports cvs checkout ports After having done the initial checkout, you can then use "cvs update" (or simply "make update") to maintain the tree. This gives you the best of both worlds: fast, efficient updates across the network, while still providing access to all the versioning features of CVS. Hope this helps. :-) -- Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 16 23:29:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA8A106564A; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:29:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from spartan.hamla.org (spartan.hamla.org [206.251.255.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B048FC0C; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACD2170F7; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:30:16 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tandon.net; h= user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:subject:from:from:date:date:received:received; s=aegis; t=1321486216; bh=Ti64nCJJflCCKUJ5RNXClzm4fvDlDiyEfvLwvHpAtxs=; b= tT+0xyDpzjLmD/AH7cyEHbYDHkkPUVgZfr9rao8qGFuBne/LymBgvkBo4Ufh9kLs v8z2kbQ2hChxBDks27z/J3I4yKE2v5EWK2jBX9lJZMqt43FaiQUVjqGlmvPoF6zM S/9Z0aNhcXkn8He07zDIZ1ZLv3AWLmXv/E0VwWxgumE= X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at spartan.hamla.org Received: from spartan.hamla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spartan.hamla.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with LMTP id 5VzVm1YBGP7B; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:30:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from magic.hamla.org (cpe-68-174-92-20.nyc.res.rr.com [68.174.92.20]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA5A817042; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:30:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:30:43 -0500 From: Sahil Tandon To: Wietse Venema Message-ID: <20111116233043.GA20979@magic.hamla.org> References: <837B0CE2-F5DE-4D75-9FAE-044574D00E30@tandon.net> <3SkDLV1vVVzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3SkDLV1vVVzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Chris Rees , Kurt Jaeger , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , Renato Botelho Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:29:47 -0000 On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 13:16:34 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > Wietse: > > Would it be possible to give the jail a loopback interface? > > > > I don't mind if FreeBSD improves its build environment such that > > it breaks the build after 12 years. If adding a loopback interface > > fixes this, then we can all move on to more interesting things. > > On Nov 16, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > > Clamav uses loopback on its testing phase, and works fine on the build > > cluster. > > Sahil Tandon: > > What irks me is that all other Postfix versions (that also call > > postconf) have no problem building/installing on the cluster. > > It would be immensely helpful if run-time details could be made > available including line of source code, and any system configuration > details that are necessary to reproduce the condition. +1 I hope someone with access to the cluster machine can provide this information. As much as I've tried to mimic the cluster conditions myself, I am unable to reproduce the fatal socket error on any FreeBSD version. -- Sahil Tandon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 02:02:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC301065670 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 02:02:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@beardz.net) Received: from svr06-mx.btshosting.co.uk (mx-2.btshosting.co.uk [178.63.196.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA0F8FC15 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 02:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.65] (027ecff8.bb.sky.com [2.126.207.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by svr06-mx.btshosting.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C475941936; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 02:02:29 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=beardz.net; s=default; t=1321495350; bh=StKSNPIpJV34wa/Hk9JdyraNFxkly/e17Uqaobnqa9A=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=AXsre/KoA8qTUHA4P4VchBjPIxmuA2tk7olLOi1LNY96McRXemhTbuRxmIysNxwkE CkqQsYmZWLAVRBLTCvDLOLL5W0Rf0AK2cwTXtaW51wIUOUV7tHtQ1SWdXcv3L2t0PT RXV3f+i7yy9Alo7YEvpZurlYrsCNpDijhqfhAfZo= Message-ID: <4EC46B2B.40104@beardz.net> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 02:02:19 +0000 From: Jase Thew User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <837B0CE2-F5DE-4D75-9FAE-044574D00E30@tandon.net> <3SkDLV1vVVzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> <20111116233043.GA20979@magic.hamla.org> In-Reply-To: <20111116233043.GA20979@magic.hamla.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Renato Botelho , Chris Rees , Kurt Jaeger , Sahil Tandon , Wietse Venema Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 02:02:33 -0000 On 16/11/2011 23:30, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 13:16:34 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > [SNIP] >> It would be immensely helpful if run-time details could be made >> available including line of source code, and any system configuration >> details that are necessary to reproduce the condition. > > +1 > > I hope someone with access to the cluster machine can provide this > information. As much as I've tried to mimic the cluster conditions > myself, I am unable to reproduce the fatal socket error on any FreeBSD > version. > I've just managed to reproduce the fatal socket error locally. It can occur when IPv6 is enabled, but you don't have any IPv6 addresses configured on any interfaces. (Yes, having an IPv6 enabled interface with no addresses assigned is non-RFC3513 compliant, but it can and does occur). The cause (at least locally) is the socket call on line 214 in util/inet_proto.c which fails with errno 43 (EPROTONOSUPPORT - Protocol not supported). Regards, Jase. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 02:56:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6CC106567E for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 02:56:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sunpoet@sunpoet.net) Received: from sunpoet.net (sunpoet.net [220.133.12.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432808FC15 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 02:56:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by sunpoet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 86D2F1674; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:39:21 +0800 (CST) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:39:21 +0800 From: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh To: Jeremie Le Hen Message-ID: <20111117023921.GB7628@bonjour.sunpoet.net> References: <20111116214718.GD11894@felucia.tataz.chchile.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3Gf/FFewwPeBMqCJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111116214718.GD11894@felucia.tataz.chchile.org> Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [sysutils/pwsafe] Useless X11 dependency X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 02:56:24 -0000 --3Gf/FFewwPeBMqCJ Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="4jXrM3lyYWu4nBt5" Content-Disposition: inline --4jXrM3lyYWu4nBt5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:47:19PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Pleaese Cc: me when replying, I'm not subscribed. >=20 > I'm using sysutils/pwsafe on a headless server. My recent upgrade of > the port pulled in numerous useless X11 libs. >=20 > - The port doesn't seem to agree to issue the password on the terminal > anymore; > - The port compiles cleanly when the Makefile is reverted to rev 1.4. >=20 > Can you please revert your change, or at least provide a WITHOUT_X11 > knob as many other ports? >=20 > Thanks. > Regards, > --=20 > Jeremie Le Hen >=20 > Men are born free and equal. Later on, they're on their own. > Jean Yanne Hi, Please test the attached patch. It defaults to not bring in X11 deps. If it works, I'll submit a PR for it. Thanks. Regards, sunpoet --4jXrM3lyYWu4nBt5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Description: pwsafe.patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="diff,pwsafe" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Index: Makefile =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/sysutils/pwsafe/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.5 Makefile --- Makefile 21 Oct 2011 02:28:23 -0000 1.5 +++ Makefile 17 Nov 2011 01:58:46 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ =20 PORTNAME=3D pwsafe PORTVERSION=3D 0.2.0 -PORTREVISION=3D 1 +PORTREVISION=3D 2 CATEGORIES=3D sysutils MASTER_SITES=3D http://nsd.dyndns.org/pwsafe/releases/ =20 @@ -18,19 +18,25 @@ =20 GNU_CONFIGURE=3D yes USE_GMAKE=3D yes -USE_XORG=3D ice sm x11 xmu =20 MAN1=3D pwsafe.1 PLIST_FILES=3D bin/pwsafe =20 -.include +.if defined(WITH_X11) +CONFIGURE_ARGS=3D --with-x +USE_XORG=3D ice sm x11 xmu +.else +CONFIGURE_ARGS=3D ac_cv_have_x=3D"have_x=3Dno" \ + ac_cv_lib_ICE_IceConnectionNumber=3Dno \ + ac_cv_lib_X11_XOpenDisplay=3Dno \ + ac_cv_lib_Xmu_XmuInternAtom=3Dno +.endif =20 do-install: - ${INSTALL_PROGRAM} ${WRKSRC}/pwsafe ${PREFIX}/bin - ${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKSRC}/pwsafe.1 ${PREFIX}/man/man1 + ${INSTALL_PROGRAM} ${WRKSRC}/pwsafe ${PREFIX}/bin/ + ${INSTALL_MAN} ${WRKSRC}/pwsafe.1 ${MAN1PREFIX}/man/man1/ .if defined(WITH_SETUID) ${CHMOD} u+s ${PREFIX}/bin/pwsafe .endif =20 -.include - +.include --4jXrM3lyYWu4nBt5-- --3Gf/FFewwPeBMqCJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOxHPYAAoJENxEJH7MV+NrzXcP/RJUMQrwsJNayL4OBn9RxQ3I HlviNVQ8Huz+SfyxEvzq+eviYOR02N2YMSiVMgr4yCDWjQ8TC2UciBgIQawYP8xm zvEbpmg69YZloL63JTzEWZ16bPbTSZX9M8eNV8Yxv2eczAHF5zFDaAkLeHL2Qt1J MD1yfYGSow3Bu21CjHmFqTJZOQO5O3upgJ8V3f7Ma4meIKujCGvO0GJOYwCql2JU qmSj618wjiifMWFRBaSeE7KBJKxiQOYtVhmjnFQFXd2Z7K6CJF/Flw2YaXseJC3y 6U5VzQebL/F+GuDAcjVY5oQ2w0txdh8lv90sC60zUI7tl9PS2eAcj3qtSlrwxOou hrIbk1aLPZAxon7sYE3LOHxomTA3JEAdYBAO/d8N+br9vb2L0o/zV+0cyffuHrWN qSfe02EMV6J29W2qcuvAJrHjeLJ5AuuylTvUi0l/d4DtXxmYimscbRHnfGbv4F04 +Q3jtfmJEvxISbH0H5kjPo9z6K1u/ZMGF9O5121KbZi+9oybVpSNCyD4XJcKEYlV oz6QFB4KYIP6Ao2eee6BqoC4jJ8F0XwwbIyj7n3s03KAAXdkq+Z2WzowH+OZTt9v Q8g0krnKf+6rzcxcXBuEp0ft/ko92okms1H2x2ki2D33c3cFcJrSusw5cKP5Yczk nClivcrZ6AFzcYpfN9Fe =Sj9q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3Gf/FFewwPeBMqCJ-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 04:10:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0481E106566C for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 04:10:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B6D14E0FD; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 04:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4EC48951.2070908@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:10:57 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111110 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wietse Venema References: <3Sk5Nt4sX9zk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> In-Reply-To: <3Sk5Nt4sX9zk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 04:10:59 -0000 On 11/16/2011 05:03, Wietse Venema wrote: > I tend to believe that network-less build environments are not > representative for the environment where an Internet MTA would run, > but hey, what do I know. I think you're right that having a network makes the MTA more useful. :) However given the prevalence and popularity of pre-packaged software in the Unix world it's probably worth thinking about what parts of the build/configuration process need to be done at build time, and what parts should be done at run time. Not only do I work on the FreeBSD project generally, I also maintain a package building system that we use at $JOB to install packages on the various remote hosts. Having those packages do the right thing even if the package builder and the remote systems don't have identical configurations is a huge advantage. Doug -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 06:28:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2664B1065670; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:28:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeremie@le-hen.org) Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (smtp5-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23848FC15; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from endor.tataz.chchile.org (unknown [82.233.239.98]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6E9D48094; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:28:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from felucia.tataz.chchile.org (felucia.tataz.chchile.org [192.168.1.9]) by endor.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0DACA8; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by felucia.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8DF4B1360F; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:28:30 +0100 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh Message-ID: <20111117062830.GF11894@felucia.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20111116214718.GD11894@felucia.tataz.chchile.org> <20111117023921.GB7628@bonjour.sunpoet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111117023921.GB7628@bonjour.sunpoet.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Jeremie Le Hen , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [sysutils/pwsafe] Useless X11 dependency X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:28:40 -0000 Hi, On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:39:21AM +0800, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:47:19PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Pleaese Cc: me when replying, I'm not subscribed. > > > > I'm using sysutils/pwsafe on a headless server. My recent upgrade of > > the port pulled in numerous useless X11 libs. > > > > - The port doesn't seem to agree to issue the password on the terminal > > anymore; > > - The port compiles cleanly when the Makefile is reverted to rev 1.4. > > > > Can you please revert your change, or at least provide a WITHOUT_X11 > > knob as many other ports? > > > Hi, > > Please test the attached patch. It defaults to not bring in X11 deps. > If it works, I'll submit a PR for it. > Thanks. > Thanks for your swift answer. It works, please go ahead. Cheers, -- Jeremie Le Hen Men are born free and equal. Later on, they're on their own. Jean Yanne From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 08:57:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA141065674 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:57:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from fsm2.ukr.net (fsm2.ukr.net [195.214.192.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9659D8FC18 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:57:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=fsm; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=4l312y0JBYhxPDD8ZBdtOE1tGTvpzsWE7k+9+zPcYpo=; b=Cqx830nOLnMNz1CaKc8rP1bOslBO7IrJkpHUpbl/TOL4lQ7UeC5ihBZrj1FhT42f3T/PzWnmyz5jXr9y7PD3ao55C5TD1ohDg7AJFocviAmK6p9jO4BKWWfSFf52l6DVBhWz6Ngub4Ov/WTJQSWysgP2j1ETugUuqg33CsF11A4=; Received: from [81.23.24.119] (helo=nonamehost.) by fsm2.ukr.net with esmtpsa ID 1RQxQD-000Dtb-Ov for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:34:14 +0200 Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:33:47 +0200 From: Ivan Klymenko To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111117103347.22a3067b@nonamehost.> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [CFT] multimedia/cinelerra-devel port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:57:26 -0000 Hello! Need help in the testing native program of Cinelerra. http://svn.bluelife.at/index.cgi/blueports/browse/multimedia/cinelerra-devel/ Thanks! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 13:38:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (pointyhat.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::2b]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9931065676; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:38:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@freebsd.org) Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pAHDcXxR060995; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:38:33 GMT (envelope-from erwin@pointyhat.freebsd.org) Received: (from erwin@localhost) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id pAHDcXBZ060986; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:38:33 GMT (envelope-from erwin) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:38:33 GMT From: Erwin Lansing Message-Id: <201111171338.pAHDcXBZ060986@pointyhat.freebsd.org> To: fbsd@grid.einherjar.de, ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:38:34 -0000 Dear port maintainers, The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting each other in the packages/Latest directory. If your ports conflict with ports maintained by another person, please coordinate your efforts with them. Thanks, Erwin "Annoying Reminder Guy III" Lansing LATEST_LINK PORTNAME MAINTAINER ========================================================================== idnkit dns/idnkit2 fbsd@grid.einherjar.de idnkit dns/idnkit ports@FreeBSD.org Total: 2 ports From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 13:39:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E321065678 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:39:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wietse@porcupine.org) Received: from spike.porcupine.org (spike.porcupine.org [168.100.189.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2428FC0C for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by spike.porcupine.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3Skk8Y0rVxzk2RT; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:39:41 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=porcupine.org; s=dktest; t=1321537181; bh=VI6eGJBpeNdVkGlO0SWeFFG/ocA/30jPb/soSl8mPTI=; h=Subject:In-Reply-To:To:Date:Sender:From:CC:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Message-Id; b=n5tyYqrfVZVE5v6uZofseZZVt/W5Ch4dipg3LupLjlyTeeSkl/9WM/9rp+w1Y1xlN WB7b8zhRYbppkjCFbVsFdzPmiFS/ncclDV2v0frZy/NogJsgQXzTzaOZ/zlAtT5c85 rilsXehtHR3tLqzr41K+usmhaip29z9qqbK7EGdI= In-Reply-To: <4EC48951.2070908@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:39:41 -0500 (EST) Sender: wietse@porcupine.org From: Wietse Venema X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124d (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-Id: <3Skk8Y0rVxzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> Cc: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Wietse Venema Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:39:43 -0000 Doug Barton: > On 11/16/2011 05:03, Wietse Venema wrote: > > I tend to believe that network-less build environments are not > > representative for the environment where an Internet MTA would run, > > but hey, what do I know. > > I think you're right that having a network makes the MTA more useful. :) > However given the prevalence and popularity of pre-packaged software in > the Unix world it's probably worth thinking about what parts of the > build/configuration process need to be done at build time, and what > parts should be done at run time. > > Not only do I work on the FreeBSD project generally, I also maintain a > package building system that we use at $JOB to install packages on the > various remote hosts. Having those packages do the right thing even if > the package builder and the remote systems don't have identical > configurations is a huge advantage. Yup, hence my request for the immensely helpful information about your build environment. Obviously, yours differs from mine; addressing this in a responsible manner requires that I can reproduce conditions that are currently unspecified ("no network" is too vague). Wietse From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 13:54:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247421065672; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:54:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wietse@porcupine.org) Received: from spike.porcupine.org (spike.porcupine.org [IPv6:2604:8d00:189::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FF18FC08; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by spike.porcupine.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3SkkT66wwmzk2RT; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:54:02 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=porcupine.org; s=dktest; t=1321538042; bh=y3dkAlMjJS/fu74glIi/mtAZAeh5Y7nPpz+4JuiwfGY=; h=Subject:In-Reply-To:To:Date:Sender:From:CC:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Message-Id; b=pPMvsWQzCU4YZWN/7Gf9oofe5+UQuOuskcrNIC5Ld/H8UKqsWz4Ii2prPSt+Bkq1j uJ59ER0hEFtAIwteeY8hOEBKgJd4m9wRXmOa14s7FTdS+LXcE8uu1ETsUa248e8FMH dJ9bdzk6zWwoTPqCvH/lBOIJbr/CJjoMegxfsPeo= In-Reply-To: <4EC46B2B.40104@beardz.net> To: Jase Thew Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:54:02 -0500 (EST) Sender: wietse@porcupine.org From: Wietse Venema X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124d (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-Id: <3SkkT66wwmzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> Cc: Wietse Venema , Sahil Tandon , Renato Botelho , Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:54:04 -0000 Jase Thew: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > On 16/11/2011 23:30, Sahil Tandon wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 13:16:34 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > [SNIP] > >> It would be immensely helpful if run-time details could be made > >> available including line of source code, and any system configuration > >> details that are necessary to reproduce the condition. > > > > +1 > > > > I hope someone with access to the cluster machine can provide this > > information. As much as I've tried to mimic the cluster conditions > > myself, I am unable to reproduce the fatal socket error on any FreeBSD > > version. > > > > I've just managed to reproduce the fatal socket error locally. > > It can occur when IPv6 is enabled, but you don't have any IPv6 addresses > configured on any interfaces. (Yes, having an IPv6 enabled interface > with no addresses assigned is non-RFC3513 compliant, but it can and does > occur). > > The cause (at least locally) is the socket call on line 214 in > util/inet_proto.c which fails with errno 43 (EPROTONOSUPPORT - Protocol > not supported). Thanks, this is very helpful. That code has not changed in 6 years, so we are looking at an incompatible change in build environment. Would it be better to make the build environment RFC-compliant? It is easy enough for me to work around a non-standard socket() result (*), but the same bug may trip up other packages in the future, especially packages that pay attention to errors. Sloppy programmers should never be rewarded. Wietse (*) Add a test for EPROTONOSUPPORT, to the existing test for EAFNOSUPPORT. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 16:08:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE84106564A for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:08:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF848FC0A for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:08:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnk5 with SMTP id k5so1310799ggn.13 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:08:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.190.99 with SMTP id d63mr10823839yhn.73.1321546124353; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:08:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w17sm23098669anl.13.2011.11.17.08.08.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:08:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3SknST0TZsz2CG5m for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:08:41 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:08:40 -0500 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111117110840.47f0d509@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <3SkkT66wwmzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> References: <4EC46B2B.40104@beardz.net> <3SkkT66wwmzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:08:45 -0000 On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:54:02 -0500 (EST) Wietse Venema articulated: > Sloppy programmers should never be rewarded. I couldn't agree more fully. Unfortunately, they all too often are. -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ It is not a good omen when goldfish commit suicide. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 16:42:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B241065674 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:42:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=130202ED7D=athiel@yourdatacenter.com) Received: from mail.newposeidon.com (mail.newposeidon.com [72.68.153.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9528FC18 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:42:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yourdatacenter.com; s=ATlantis; h=DomainKey-Signature:Received: Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=xu0m4t1c7XmmLqoOjotESgL1JzxORKmanW 6JN4hyzDk=; b=S1A1K9jTHZrcXf7D/4gSFCcSi/3+CPbTRibgYB1rIk/Dqc1ekM OIlIhcYONvSyTMd9LSt1AfMU9HS/aKq0LkvxxEJS2yVeJNEg/591fGH0SN2HDA8g lnb0zFiuDJRsZT DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=ATlantis; d=yourdatacenter.com; b=me+4nXYF+HBc7S/VO7eqAwrf9F12SfAHH+uoHFrQYHPiLFtw0CAuzrRMnFqt6chhewvxE0BWny47aF8K2oxcLh5UuAlm13fJUfVnE9AVUZGOyYtHewSLCSL8yEarqzrE Received: from yourdatacenter.com (unverified [127.0.0.1]) by mail.newposeidon.com (Vircom SMTPRS 5.1.1024.13396) with ESMTP id for (AUTH = athiel@yourdatacenter.com); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:31:56 -0500 X-Modus-BlackList: 127.0.0.1=OK;athiel@yourdatacenter.com=OK X-Modus-Trusted: 127.0.0.1=YES X-Modus-Audit: FALSE;0;0;0 Message-ID: X-EM-APIVersion: 2, 0, 2, 6 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) From: "Albert Thiel" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:31:56 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: BIND 9 question X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:42:05 -0000 I have been hearing that since last night DNS 0-day exploitation is taking p= lace all over the net=2E =20 ISC mentions recursion=2E Is this vulnerability only on DNS that allows rec= ursive queries? (if so mine=20 is safe thankfully)=2E Is there a patch to the BSD flavor of BIND expected t= o address this? Thanks for your assistance, Al Albert Thiel athiel@yourdatacenter=2Ecom =20 Your Data Center Incorporated The home of HostLongIsland=2Ecom We are a Google Favorite Place! http://www=2EYourDataCenter=2Ecom Hewlett, New York Phone: (516)256-DATA Nassau County, NY: (516)279-1346 Suffolk County, NY: (631)479-3345 New York City: (212)203-8964 Toll-Free USA/Canada: (800)651-YDCI London England (UK): 020=2E33181929 Remote Live Support:=20 http://www=2Eyourdatacenter=2Ecom/support=2Ehtml =20 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 16:55:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DCC71065672; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:55:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD858FC0C; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iakl21 with SMTP id l21so3408895iak.13 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:55:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=qgG2NeUMcxilEq+8Iw8NYq8LzQJms37fm8nwUvz4+aA=; b=vu2oqpYpeUJnk/Eec6nSWv+phsj0D6UorPKTWiFryqheydGVW8L6t9LK0wl6xhYFCA yAdXnIFDDd7McGF47TXCT41O/Y+DNtbDJdF8DnzNeYePFNz1yIDVCHPDYgfN49tCze+d n4ihmGlDnBuio2yA8o6oLhGlYGIyrAFT5MqpA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.148.136 with SMTP id r8mr43117652icv.1.1321548952486; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:55:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.11.140 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:55:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.11.140 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:55:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201111171338.pAHDcXBZ060986@pointyhat.freebsd.org> References: <201111171338.pAHDcXBZ060986@pointyhat.freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:55:52 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Erwin Lansing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, fbsd@grid.einherjar.de Subject: Re: Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:55:53 -0000 On 17 Nov 2011 13:38, "Erwin Lansing" wrote: > > Dear port maintainers, > > The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate > LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique > LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting > each other in the packages/Latest directory. If your ports conflict with > ports maintained by another person, please coordinate your efforts with > them. > > > Thanks, > Erwin "Annoying Reminder Guy III" Lansing > > > LATEST_LINK PORTNAME MAINTAINER > ========================================================================== > idnkit dns/idnkit2 fbsd@grid.einherjar.de > idnkit dns/idnkit ports@FreeBSD.org > > Total: 2 ports > Sorry, my fault. I'll fix it later tonight. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 17:04:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 813D0106564A for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:04:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232378FC15 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnk5 with SMTP id k5so1423689ggn.13 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:04:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.137.3 with SMTP id p3mr11293761ann.140.1321549491448; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:04:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k20sm97594408ann.15.2011.11.17.09.04.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:04:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3SkpjD0f5Vz2CG5m; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:04:48 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:04:47 -0500 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111117120447.73447103@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEUAAABYRlwJCw4FAgAIBwKprDkBAQFQLR0BAgCir7VRttp8AAACAUlEQVQ4jZWUTYvbMBCGTVl8V2hX6Gg5G5FbWQdBj0lEfE7BhN4cyzi5Wt1E5L70roWy6N92xok/skkP+5IYrMcz78xIduDWpNM3vFzuA/jX5EY1AI6KHFwW/CzFuQAwqUBbV12p+CzIh6Awq7sg33pn5D64SQXAexffeuQlA/L35RrkaB551OjGfP/cAO8mCNaDcgvfky5ijoD0pAXlCQCnljiAjsJD9Ax05Ko5sZxbnLQcmM+dZg5IjREfZrWIHK0JuwU68pAGwHvfRxBundRzTxxz3r9dNUikPsEihjz2Dc4kjp1hKsJGuot4EDxaxzMoC7XqhxhOSfZrTS6gSX1JVdjp+o1PvWfekXgw3WL0g70nDEwA0H0HQsEZc8sTmFMTkWUfYWC/vdR1zQy3xLQgLwzu90QnlnFLjeiGWBjwhb4Sa42IqOg2qqS4O1/zhKokFUb1Q8Rj4Eb69WVflXEehJ35DgChVTE5n50eaGyMLOfH8AOodoSM4PVYAQgQdBulOa+knklYks3vAuQ+uX492lTl+A+e8qBV2AKoXalVKFfyuUp0pUp1ARaUHh82lv9MN+Ig7CZtgE6FNYvjlywT2VP2dMgOG46gTIWcqdfvuwyXNz0oMJNd/N5lh1YNiJt19ADTUo3VuFSNeQwVqRSrGjSCp53fk2g+Mvfk/gfoPxHeUS8MH9vRAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org Subject: Updating Bash X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:04:52 -0000 I understand that there seems to be some reluctance to updating the "shells/bash" port until after the release of FreeBSD-9.0 at some future date. I am not sure I understand the reasoning behind this logic. If there is a problem with the newer version of Bash, currently 4.1.11 in ports with version 4.2.x currently available and the soon to be released version of 4.3 on the horizon; wouldn't it make more sense to find out if there is in fact a problem with this shell version prior to the release of FreeBSD-9.0? Bash is a commonly used shell and I cannot see what the goal of abstaining from updating it now is? It would certainly seem that if waiting for FBSD-9.0's release and subsequently finding out that the newer version of Bash fails would compound fixing the problem. -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ The best way to avoid responsibility is to blame it on someone else. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 18:08:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E61E106566C for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:08:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (trang.nuxi.org [74.95.12.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 501D98FC08 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:08:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pAHHfMCV005142; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:41:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.5/8.14.4/Submit) id pAHHfMhT005141; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:41:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:41:22 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: jerry@seibercom.net Message-ID: <20111117174122.GA5072@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <20111117120447.73447103@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111117120447.73447103@scorpio> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT X-to-the-FBI-CIA-and-NSA: HI! HOW YA DOIN? User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating Bash X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:08:45 -0000 On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:04:47PM -0500, Jerry wrote: > I understand that there seems to be some reluctance to updating the > "shells/bash" port until after the release of FreeBSD-9.0 at some > future date. I am not sure I understand the reasoning behind this > logic. If there is a problem with the newer version of Bash, currently > 4.1.11 in ports with version 4.2.x currently available and the soon to > be released version of 4.3 on the horizon; wouldn't it make more sense > to find out if there is in fact a problem with this shell version prior > to the release of FreeBSD-9.0? No, I do not think it would not make more sense. I really do not fully follow your argument. FreeBSD 9.0 is now in the Release Candidate stage. That means release is imminent. How long do you think it would take to determine if version 4.2 was suitable for burning on the 9.0-RELEASE DVD? If the community does not find any issues with 4.2 (either due to the code itself, or interactions with dependency ports and how we build things in /usr/ports) within say... 5 days -- does that really mean major problems won't be discovered in 10 days? Or the day after the 9.0-RELEASE ISO images are posted? To better help me understand your point of view, can you explain your immediate need for version 4.2 vs. 4.1.11? What feature or bug fix have you identified as majorly affecting you? > Bash is a commonly used shell and I cannot see what the goal of ^^^^^^^^^^ an extremely > abstaining from updating it now is? It would certainly seem that if > waiting for FBSD-9.0's release and subsequently finding out that the > newer version of Bash fails would compound fixing the problem. What problem would be compounded? And how would it be compounded? If the Bash using community truly wants version 4.2 in FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE I am willing to do the upgrade now -- but there needs to be a super majority calling for its upgrade. [Or a directive from Portsmgr] -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 18:23:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32AD106566C for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:23:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wietse@porcupine.org) Received: from spike.porcupine.org (spike.porcupine.org [168.100.189.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C378FC1C for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by spike.porcupine.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3SkrRf563xzk2RT; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:23:10 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=porcupine.org; s=dktest; t=1321554190; bh=QY59uTUwsdBdz0ZNfJJYkhMxxBnU+KGSSr8boI75GXI=; h=Subject:In-Reply-To:To:Date:Sender:From:CC:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Message-Id; b=Q3p5Yeyk3ZF4L0Ln9zXTZSpA9nxAhpKEgBRiFa5MHRlxf0Fj/wSTHU6yr7mScg28y /Tc+UiyQ5pP86PzsHq3AukhMwJkd4OWQGMqKoA0BRDSWhkufq0d6Qc3LUx9l7FK+Ch 1dNYHTodIe3TXOp9EjiveGWxpmkY3n4qWFX3a4QY= In-Reply-To: <3SkkT66wwmzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> To: Wietse Venema Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:23:10 -0500 (EST) Sender: wietse@porcupine.org From: Wietse Venema X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124d (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-Id: <3SkrRf563xzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> Cc: Sahil Tandon , Renato Botelho , Jase Thew , Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:23:12 -0000 Wietse Venema: > Jase Thew: > > It can occur when IPv6 is enabled, but you don't have any IPv6 addresses > > configured on any interfaces. (Yes, having an IPv6 enabled interface > > with no addresses assigned is non-RFC3513 compliant, but it can and does > > occur). ... > Thanks, this is very helpful. That code has not changed in 6 years, > so we are looking at an incompatible change in build environment. Actually, a Postfix built-in default setting changed on 20110918. It now enables IPv6 unless this is turned off in a configuration file. I can fix that at compile time, and thereby not trigger the error on build systems with unexpected IPv6 configurations. Wietse From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 18:23:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D631065672; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6418FC15; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:23:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl11 with SMTP id l11so2104306yen.13 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:23:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.146.200.27 with SMTP id x27mr2619215yaf.31.1321554232229; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:23:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i31sm76131824anm.19.2011.11.17.10.23.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:23:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3SkrSP3dyrz2CG5m; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:23:49 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:23:49 -0500 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111117132349.7ac73ce5@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20111117174122.GA5072@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <20111117120447.73447103@scorpio> <20111117174122.GA5072@dragon.NUXI.org> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Updating Bash X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:23:53 -0000 On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:41:22 -0800 David O'Brien articulated: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:04:47PM -0500, Jerry wrote: > > I understand that there seems to be some reluctance to updating the > > "shells/bash" port until after the release of FreeBSD-9.0 at some > > future date. I am not sure I understand the reasoning behind this > > logic. If there is a problem with the newer version of Bash, > > currently 4.1.11 in ports with version 4.2.x currently available > > and the soon to be released version of 4.3 on the horizon; wouldn't > > it make more sense to find out if there is in fact a problem with > > this shell version prior to the release of FreeBSD-9.0? > > No, I do not think it would not make more sense. > > I really do not fully follow your argument. > > FreeBSD 9.0 is now in the Release Candidate stage. That means release > is imminent. How long do you think it would take to determine if > version 4.2 was suitable for burning on the 9.0-RELEASE DVD? If the > community does not find any issues with 4.2 (either due to the code > itself, or interactions with dependency ports and how we build things > in /usr/ports) within say... 5 days -- does that really mean major > problems won't be discovered in 10 days? Or the day after the > 9.0-RELEASE ISO images are posted? Ports are being updated everyday. I am assuming that they will be included on the 9.0-RELEASE DVD. Personally, I never use the CD/DVD for installation for other than the very basic system anyway. I prefer using the FTP method to download the very latest updates in the ports systems. It saves valuable time in not having to update a freshly installed system immediately after installing it (usually anyway). Furthermore, why would you consider finding a potential problem in Bash any different than finding a problem in KDE ten days or so after it has been release. In fact, I would say the odds of finding a problem in KDE would be a multitude of times greater than that of Bash. > To better help me understand your point of view, can you explain your > immediate need for version 4.2 vs. 4.1.11? What feature or bug fix > have you identified as majorly affecting you? > > > > Bash is a commonly used shell and I cannot see what the goal of > ^^^^^^^^^^ > an extremely > > > abstaining from updating it now is? It would certainly seem that if > > waiting for FBSD-9.0's release and subsequently finding out that the > > newer version of Bash fails would compound fixing the problem. > > What problem would be compounded? And how would it be compounded? The problem that I am attempting to elevate is the one where I install FreeBSD-9.0 with my shell of choice, Bash and then have to update it when you decide to update the port to a version that is presently all ready available. This doesn't fall into the catastrophic category but rather the annoyance category. In any case, since you have waited so long on updating to the 4.2 version, released on 13-Feb-2011, you might as well wait for the 4.3 version to be release. From what I have read, its release is imminent. > If the Bash using community truly wants version 4.2 in FreeBSD > 9.0-RELEASE I am willing to do the upgrade now -- but there needs > to be a super majority calling for its upgrade. > [Or a directive from Portsmgr] -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 19:10:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51A61065672 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:10:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from fsm2.ukr.net (fsm2.ukr.net [195.214.192.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B9738FC1B for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:10:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=fsm; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=u45RNTN8riw59gaFEcENAIxYhQCIKAli9o8EMC1LIKM=; b=jnLJXHfz7Jf0Dw6z4oDEagodlUlEiglST0gvHflFeTEUbGD6wncw8DbW1H2LXiCeMr4G4XAYuwDKdefTM2ak7rymdKzyUCBKiBmg1NBYnLNoz9VzRlde/SuzUxjN4bLHJMyUjF+9led3a387A3B74Ix8UlvlWy6uaSy98HAlYVA=; Received: from [81.23.24.119] (helo=nonamehost.) by fsm2.ukr.net with esmtpsa ID 1RR7M5-000APQ-4f ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:10:38 +0200 Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:09:59 +0200 From: Ivan Klymenko To: Ivan Klymenko Message-ID: <20111117210959.1cb77bff@nonamehost.> In-Reply-To: <20111117103347.22a3067b@nonamehost.> References: <20111117103347.22a3067b@nonamehost.> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] multimedia/cinelerra-devel port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:10:39 -0000 =D0=92 Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:33:47 +0200 Ivan Klymenko =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > Hello! > Need help in the testing native program of Cinelerra. >=20 > http://svn.bluelife.at/index.cgi/blueports/browse/multimedia/cinelerra-de= vel/ >=20 > Thanks! If someone have problems with access to the svn Here's the archive port - the same revision (r1403) and that in svn at the present moment... http://www.bsdstore.ru/fidaj/cinelerra-devel.tar.bz2 Thanks! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 19:49:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4647A1065673 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from code@apotheon.net) Received: from oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy1.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07FEC8FC12 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:49:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19829 invoked by uid 0); 17 Nov 2011 19:49:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by oproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 17 Nov 2011 19:49:21 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apotheon.net; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=otNjjcORYuMKXPCFVr+iiCaPCcr5aZpxorIMPkFsM8g=; b=V0HNI6cpkgxswrU8SA0XkqZ8HUboo5N5ZxUTn7Cnn7CxQsH7e2ks5VKpsWfoPr6s7KPQYRRZyog6gMCU45xgvFQFuejJvhZw6i3yje+Gpa7nPszQ4+pTTHpHNwZlHl2K; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RR7xY-0003AO-ME for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:49:21 -0700 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:46:38 -0700 Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:46:38 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111117194638.GA45380@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20111117120447.73447103@scorpio> <20111117174122.GA5072@dragon.NUXI.org> <20111117132349.7ac73ce5@scorpio> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111117132349.7ac73ce5@scorpio> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: Updating Bash X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:49:22 -0000 --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 01:23:49PM -0500, Jerry wrote: >=20 > Ports are being updated everyday. I am assuming that they will be > included on the 9.0-RELEASE DVD. Personally, I never use the CD/DVD for > installation for other than the very basic system anyway. I prefer using > the FTP method to download the very latest updates in the ports > systems. It saves valuable time in not having to update a freshly > installed system immediately after installing it (usually anyway). Unfortunately, you are not the only user they must consider. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk7FZJ4ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXyNgCgoAlNFfI+JPIRbA1O3aqMhi8N Se4AoPkaTHwU1sGJ7e7eBIIHrX4M8jN1 =R0E2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 19:54:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33134106566C; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:54:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (m209-73.dsl.rawbw.com [198.144.209.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020C98FC0C; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pAHJiCkZ031680; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:44:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id pAHJiCEV031679; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:44:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david) Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:44:12 -0800 From: David Wolfskill To: ehaupt@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20111117194412.GP1706@albert.catwhisker.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aC33ObtQAkNdOZ6b" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Support for running xterm within a jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:54:13 -0000 --aC33ObtQAkNdOZ6b Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8WA4ILJSyYAmUzbY" Content-Disposition: inline --8WA4ILJSyYAmUzbY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At $WORK, we have recently been reminded that xterm doesn't cope all that well with being invoked in an environment that returns ENOENT on xterm's attempt to open /dev/tty (in main.c). (The environment in question is a jailed 32-bit FreeBSD running on a FreeBSD/amd64 host. Developers need to build in the jail; apparently they also want to run things like emacs in the jails.) In looking at the xterm sources, I found that there's some code (near main.c:3311 - 3329) to take evasive action if the attempt to open /dev/tty fails. There's even a bit to effectively ignore ENOENT -- if __CYGWIN__ is defined. But that's not our case -- and we don't want to be defining __CYGWIN__ when we're building xterm for FreeBSD. Given that FreeBSD (with devfs) *can* return ENOENT to the attempt to open /dev/tty, it isn't clear to me why that aprticular "error" condition isn't ignored unconditionally (in a FreeBSD environment, at least). Accordingly, I cobbled up a patch (attached), and a colleague has verified that it avoids the issue we were encountering: it allows xterm to run in the jail. Do you think the xterm folks would be receptive to either making the "ignore ENOENT" unconditional or conditioning it on (say) "__CYGWIN_" being defined or "__FREEBSD__" being defined? Failing that (or in the mean time) would you be receptive to a patch to the FreeBSD xterm port to patch xterm in a way similar to the attached patch? (I realize we're approaching 9.0-RELEASE; I'm not asking anyone to make changes before that release date.) Thanks! Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --8WA4ILJSyYAmUzbY Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="xterm_ENOENT.diff" --- main.c.orig 2011-09-04 11:04:33.000000000 -0700 +++ main.c 2011-11-14 20:12:29.000000000 -0800 @@ -3311,19 +3311,18 @@ * necessary. ENXIO is what is normally returned if there is * no controlling terminal, but some systems (e.g. SunOS 4.0) * seem to return EIO. Solaris 2.3 is said to return EINVAL. - * Cygwin returns ENOENT. + * Cygwin returns ENOENT. FreeBSD can return ENOENT, especially + * if xterm is run within a jail. */ #if USE_NO_DEV_TTY no_dev_tty = False; #endif if (ttyfd < 0) { if (tty_got_hung || errno == ENXIO || errno == EIO || + errno == ENOENT || #ifdef ENODEV errno == ENODEV || #endif -#ifdef __CYGWIN__ - errno == ENOENT || -#endif errno == EINVAL || errno == ENOTTY || errno == EACCES) { #if USE_NO_DEV_TTY no_dev_tty = True; --8WA4ILJSyYAmUzbY-- --aC33ObtQAkNdOZ6b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk7FZAsACgkQmprOCmdXAD29sACfWc6m5hTq3HfLitIG2/wE3XSk iWoAnjNjLrYr1wCqk3lCEYB5j27D/TNn =f/Xo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aC33ObtQAkNdOZ6b-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 20:13:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29D1106566C for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:13:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sup.oook.cz (sup.oook.cz [94.23.0.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA648FC13 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:13:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.23] (ip-78-102-160-251.net.upcbroadband.cz [78.102.160.251]) (authenticated bits=0) by sup.oook.cz (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAHKDVfg036440; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:13:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) From: Pav Lucistnik To: Wietse Venema In-Reply-To: <3SkrRf563xzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> References: <3SkrRf563xzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ZdzetWsABd2/cH2SR/gI" Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:13:25 +0100 Message-ID: <1321560805.6735.15.camel@hood.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 94.23.0.135 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: sup.oook.cz; Sender-ip: 78.102.160.251; Sender-helo: [192.168.0.23]; ) Cc: Sahil Tandon , Renato Botelho , Jase Thew , Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:13:37 -0000 --=-ZdzetWsABd2/cH2SR/gI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wietse Venema p=ED=B9e v =E8t 17. 11. 2011 v 13:23 -0500: > Wietse Venema: > > Jase Thew: > > > It can occur when IPv6 is enabled, but you don't have any IPv6 addres= ses=20 > > > configured on any interfaces. (Yes, having an IPv6 enabled interface= =20 > > > with no addresses assigned is non-RFC3513 compliant, but it can and d= oes=20 > > > occur). > ... > > Thanks, this is very helpful. That code has not changed in 6 years, > > so we are looking at an incompatible change in build environment. >=20 > Actually, a Postfix built-in default setting changed on 20110918. >=20 > It now enables IPv6 unless this is turned off in a configuration > file. I can fix that at compile time, and thereby not trigger > the error on build systems with unexpected IPv6 configurations. This is interesting. The build jails are configured to have only IPv4 address on lo0, but the host have both IPv4 and IPv6 configured on its lo0. Changing the jail configuration is possible but if a reasonable workaround can be made in postfix-current port I'd prefer not to touch pointyhat configuration (unexpected consequences and all that...) --=20 --=20 Pav Lucistnik MIPS: Meaningless Information Provided by Salesmen --=-ZdzetWsABd2/cH2SR/gI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk7FauQACgkQntdYP8FOsoLxNgCgz1YVUF1X4MEZFigVrEmGWzNr DBUAnj6bvHNVGpMfg2TQ5Vk2cIUEzoVm =EPYm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ZdzetWsABd2/cH2SR/gI-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 20:41:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 833A6106564A; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:41:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wietse@porcupine.org) Received: from spike.porcupine.org (spike.porcupine.org [IPv6:2604:8d00:189::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6948FC1A; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:41:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by spike.porcupine.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3SkvVw2ZYzzk2RT; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:41:12 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=porcupine.org; s=dktest; t=1321562472; bh=t4sw2d/kHgoAk5FpkgqWvgBrg1qZJdW5+PeHJMvzsxg=; h=Subject:In-Reply-To:To:Date:Sender:From:CC:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Message-Id; b=DkQQDXAkVBMyme3X6r1tEvCmVY4KNeKQi/mBPKShBjK2qm/R86GfEbXN9Byssbp9A sMojhXisjmMl0c7OiSVSVLGYinhQLQMjkYQas1kvrS4WZIRj+/R9I42DkkpPPX4TET XSCMEilhAsU5JGQU9ig50jWjlUz6mCaqZoNqJNiw= In-Reply-To: <1321560805.6735.15.camel@hood.oook.cz> To: pav@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:41:12 -0500 (EST) Sender: wietse@porcupine.org From: Wietse Venema X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124d (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-Id: <3SkvVw2ZYzzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> Cc: Wietse Venema , Sahil Tandon , Renato Botelho , Jase Thew , Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:41:13 -0000 Pav Lucistnik: > Wietse Venema p??e v ?t 17. 11. 2011 v 13:23 -0500: > > Actually, a Postfix built-in default setting changed on 20110918. > > > > It now enables IPv6 unless this is turned off in a configuration > > file. I can fix that at compile time, and thereby not trigger > > the error on build systems with unexpected IPv6 configurations. > > This is interesting. > > The build jails are configured to have only IPv4 address on lo0, > but the host have both IPv4 and IPv6 configured on its lo0. > > Changing the jail configuration is possible but if a reasonable > workaround can be made in postfix-current port I'd prefer not to touch > pointyhat configuration (unexpected consequences and all that...) I can competely fix this specific error instance with a one-line config file change, but I don't want to end up in the same boat again when some other program needs to be run during build time. A more proactive workaround would be to treat "protocol not supported" as a non-fatal error, just like "address family not supported" is. Please let me know if this works in the build cluster. It will log a warning but that should be justfied, because the system does have an abnormal configuration. Wietse *** src/util/inet_proto.c- Tue Jan 8 15:36:13 2008 --- src/util/inet_proto.c Thu Nov 17 08:49:31 2011 *************** *** 219,225 **** pf->dns_atype_list = make_unsigned_vector(3, T_A, T_AAAA, 0); pf->sa_family_list = make_uchar_vector(3, AF_INET, AF_INET6, 0); break; ! } else if (errno == EAFNOSUPPORT) { msg_warn("%s: IPv6 support is disabled: %m", context); msg_warn("%s: configuring for IPv4 support only", context); /* FALLTHROUGH */ --- 219,225 ---- pf->dns_atype_list = make_unsigned_vector(3, T_A, T_AAAA, 0); pf->sa_family_list = make_uchar_vector(3, AF_INET, AF_INET6, 0); break; ! } else if (errno == EAFNOSUPPORT || errno == EPROTONOSUPPORT) { msg_warn("%s: IPv6 support is disabled: %m", context); msg_warn("%s: configuring for IPv4 support only", context); /* FALLTHROUGH */ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 21:20:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCEE8106564A for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:20:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E900B1549CE; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:20:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4EC57AA2.9000104@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:20:34 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111110 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Albert Thiel References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND 9 question X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:20:35 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 11/17/2011 08:31, Albert Thiel wrote: > I have been hearing that since last night DNS 0-day exploitation is > taking place all over the net. I dislike the term "0-day" because it means different things to different people. What is true is that a large number of BIND recursive name servers have been crashing with the same error messages, which seems to be the result of an active and heretofore unknown exploit. https://www.isc.org/software/bind/advisories/cve-2011-4313 > ISC mentions recursion. Is this vulnerability only on DNS that > allows recursive queries? (if so mine is safe thankfully). At this time it appears true that authoritative-only servers are not vulnerable. > Is there a patch to the BSD flavor of BIND expected to address > this? The ports, 10-current, stable/8 and stable/7 were all updated yesterday shortly after ISC publicly released the code. hth, Doug - -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOxXqiAAoJEFzGhvEaGryElTgH/A1c38kgpXaRhl2W9v/PBgvz 1fI8pZP49eh9aw7pWfMEvWh/UwkL4CNQUhFoG+XMIbHLtQbH1412w/CrVuGQJ2bN H7a1fm07K3I8FiP5yO5v8fOiSjEQV1nmP5GPrFUTZxvh4Xeh6gWzGxCL/HVL2CK+ uPzgLv5oCfxYEdySFUyvJXRgcUBBg3efuR3LyhxpSjWhBC/FpbgxG2GS2dyfk/FP nT4XxTg/0y4n96dfryskmLAT1j+cuoxyqFNp5goiz9Nl0/AisPIZ6kDVJD1wKtlP QnkEAPHgowzeKKDFK2dkrmOszSHxGAdUki3D+iFxwEOn7lFgcPC6hDEgT6Y4oPw= =IxSX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 05:01:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8687B106566B; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:01:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6372C8FC14; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:01:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id pAI51f06029856 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:01:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id pAI51fxb029855; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:01:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA03253; Thu, 17 Nov 11 20:49:07 PST Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:48:49 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: pav@freebsd.org Message-Id: <4ec64621.5VnWOe6lq5n/i0BQ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <3SkrRf563xzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> <1321560805.6735.15.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <1321560805.6735.15.camel@hood.oook.cz> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: wietse@porcupine.org, sahil+freebsd-ports@tandon.net, garga@freebsd.org, freebsd@beardz.net, lists@opsec.eu, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, utisoft@gmail.com Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:01:50 -0000 Pav Lucistnik wrote: > The build jails are configured to have only IPv4 address on lo0, > but the host have both IPv4 and IPv6 configured on its lo0. Even disregarding RFC3513, is an IPv6-enabled kernel without an IPv6 address on lo0 a realistic configuration for a "real" FreeBSD system? If not, I'd think it worthwhile to make pointyhat more realistic. (Either way, it seems unobjectionable to improve the robustness of postfix, making it more liberal in what it accepts.) > Changing the jail configuration is possible but if a reasonable > workaround can be made in postfix-current port I'd prefer not to > touch pointyhat configuration (unexpected consequences and all > that...) It may be a bit late in the 9.0 release cycle to be messing with the pointyhat configuration, but an adjustment might be considered after 9.0-RELEASE is done. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 08:24:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2CB61065670 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:24:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from buryanov@ukr.net) Received: from ffe10.ukr.net (ffe10.ukr.net [195.214.192.60]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FC68FC15 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:24:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=ffe; h=Date:Message-Id:From:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=vzuHbOD+pE946ZvzA1OaM504wFTTP7cXdTl1LsYqMoU=; b=A/qJHGitktzfueMI5Vc392FHc8Er87WeYmTClTGeAAa9b+BdlgYyXXL/glf1aL8/eP8FThIG3NUTdUb/r4kmgA5h4oxwlbqAACuBYSNRKiq8zC19KBCERVbHe1HooXTw3rnLgC1UWIBjTkoWZXqOIIhmkm4LNndX0mWiuVIGpRk=; Received: from mail by ffe10.ukr.net with local ID 1RRJTq-000FxX-Gs for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:07:26 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: =?WINDOWS-1251?B?xOzo8vDo6SDB8/D8/+3u4g==?= X-Mailer: freemail.ukr.net 4.0 X-Originating-Ip: [82.117.234.6] Message-Id: <60619.1321603646.1220542315353538560@ffe10.ukr.net> X-Browser: Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1; U; uk) Presto/2.9.168 Version/11.52 Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:07:26 +0200 Subject: ospfd daemon (quagga-0.99.20_2) not work on freebsd 8.2#0 x64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:24:59 -0000 zebra.log 2011/11/18 09:26:08 OSPF: ospf_recv_packet read length mismatch: ip_len is 64, but recvmsg returned 84 2011/11/18 09:26:15 OSPF: LSA[Refresh]:ospf_lsa_refresh_walker(): start 2011/11/18 09:26:15 OSPF: LSA[Refresh]: ospf_lsa_refresh_walker(): next index 192 2011/11/18 09:26:15 OSPF: LSA[Refresh]: ospf_lsa_refresh_walker(): refresh index 191 2011/11/18 09:26:15 OSPF: LSA[Refresh]: ospf_lsa_refresh_walker(): end 2011/11/18 09:26:15 OSPF: ISM[vlan464:192.168.224.131]: Timer (Hello timer expire) on /usr/ports/net/quagga/files/patch-ospfd__ospf_packet.c --- ospfd/ospf_packet.c.orig 2011-09-29 18:59:32.000000000 +0600 +++ ospfd/ospf_packet.c 2011-11-12 12:02:58.000000000 +0600 @@ -2116,7 +2116,7 @@ ip_len = iph->ip_len; -#if !defined(GNU_LINUX) && (OpenBSD < 200311) +#if !defined(GNU_LINUX) && (OpenBSD < 200311) && (__FreeBSD_version >= 1000000) /* * Kernel network code touches incoming IP header parameters, * before protocol specific processing. can change +#if !defined(GNU_LINUX) && (OpenBSD < 200311) && (__FreeBSD_version >= 1000000) to +#if !defined(GNU_LINUX) && (OpenBSD < 200311) && (__FreeBSD_version < 1000000) Dmytro Burianov buryanov@ukr.net icq: 118639660 skype: buryanov 380-50-343-74-70 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 09:11:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D423E106564A for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:11:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from mail.zoral.com.ua (mx0.zoral.com.ua [91.193.166.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C8D8FC16 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:11:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alf.home (alf.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.177]) by mail.zoral.com.ua (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id pAI9BlZJ001017 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:11:47 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from alf.home (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alf.home (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pAI9BlHo016823; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:11:47 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by alf.home (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id pAI9BkDP016822; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:11:46 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: alf.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:11:46 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov To: David Wolfskill Message-ID: <20111118091146.GZ50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20111117194412.GP1706@albert.catwhisker.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GKlHQQh5GQ4Mg0aN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111117194412.GP1706@albert.catwhisker.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, ehaupt@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Support for running xterm within a jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:11:57 -0000 --GKlHQQh5GQ4Mg0aN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:44:12AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > At $WORK, we have recently been reminded that xterm doesn't cope all > that well with being invoked in an environment that returns ENOENT on > xterm's attempt to open /dev/tty (in main.c). >=20 > (The environment in question is a jailed 32-bit FreeBSD running on a > FreeBSD/amd64 host. Developers need to build in the jail; apparently > they also want to run things like emacs in the jails.) >=20 > In looking at the xterm sources, I found that there's some code (near > main.c:3311 - 3329) to take evasive action if the attempt to open > /dev/tty fails. >=20 > There's even a bit to effectively ignore ENOENT -- if __CYGWIN__ is > defined. >=20 > But that's not our case -- and we don't want to be defining __CYGWIN__ > when we're building xterm for FreeBSD. >=20 > Given that FreeBSD (with devfs) *can* return ENOENT to the attempt to > open /dev/tty, it isn't clear to me why that aprticular "error" > condition isn't ignored unconditionally (in a FreeBSD environment, at > least). >=20 > Accordingly, I cobbled up a patch (attached), and a colleague has > verified that it avoids the issue we were encountering: it allows xterm > to run in the jail. >=20 > Do you think the xterm folks would be receptive to either making the > "ignore ENOENT" unconditional or conditioning it on (say) "__CYGWIN_" > being defined or "__FREEBSD__" being defined? >=20 > Failing that (or in the mean time) would you be receptive to a patch to > the FreeBSD xterm port to patch xterm in a way similar to the attached > patch? >=20 > (I realize we're approaching 9.0-RELEASE; I'm not asking anyone to make > changes before that release date.) I am sure that the issue is a misconfiguration of the jail or attempt to start xterm from the process that has no control terminal. For jail misconfiguration, I mean either failure to properly mount devfs into the jail /dev, or a rule that hides /dev/tty from the jail. I use very similar configuration (32bit stable/8 jail on amd64 stable/9 kernel) and have no issues starting xterm. That said, you should diagnose the issue further, otherwise I think the patch is unneccessary. --GKlHQQh5GQ4Mg0aN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk7GIVIACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4jJCACeKyZbTS4RktMjn2pZ+FckiPap wRUAnj5chFlE9dFgQPLvF62q80WDOy2d =HGKP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GKlHQQh5GQ4Mg0aN-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 12:53:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABBB2106564A for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:53:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB3C8FC13 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.113.99.128] (helo=tiny.Sisis.de.) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RRNwu-0008QU-Mn; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:53:46 +0100 Received: from tiny.Sisis.de. (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiny.Sisis.de. (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pAICs5oM001268; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:54:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by tiny.Sisis.de. (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id pAICs4FX001267; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:54:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: tiny.Sisis.de.: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:54:04 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111118125403.GA1255@tiny> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 82.113.99.128 Cc: makc@freebsd.org Subject: ports/textproc/stardict3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:53:47 -0000 Hello, The port (ports tree from CVS) ports/textproc/stardict3 ports/textproc/stardict3 PORTVERSION= 3.0.3 MAINTAINER= makc@FreeBSD.org installs fine on 10-CURRENT, but the application just crahes or runs into a CPU loop; if it runs into CPU loop there is a core file of 'troff', i.e. it seems that it started for some man page reason the troff(1) and after this it loops; I went back for this port only to # cvs update -r RELEASE_8_2_0 which brings> PORTVERSION= 3.0.1 PORTREVISION= 5 and this works just fine with all my dictionaries. I could go back to 3.0.3 and provide more details of the crash, but I can't debug or solve this on my own. Or should I file a bug report? HIH matthias -- Matthias Apitz e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 13:39:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AE41065678 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:39:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7318FC19 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:39:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghbg20 with SMTP id g20so582493ghb.13 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:39:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.181.234 with SMTP id l70mr4831372yhm.49.1321623574954; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:39:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d63sm943259yhl.10.2011.11.18.05.39.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:39:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3SlL5v5kg0z2CG4m for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:39:31 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:39:31 -0500 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111118083931.12bf0500@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4ec64621.5VnWOe6lq5n/i0BQ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <3SkrRf563xzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> <1321560805.6735.15.camel@hood.oook.cz> <4ec64621.5VnWOe6lq5n/i0BQ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:39:36 -0000 On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:48:49 -0800 perryh@pluto.rain.com articulated: > Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > The build jails are configured to have only IPv4 address on lo0, > > but the host have both IPv4 and IPv6 configured on its lo0. > > Even disregarding RFC3513, is an IPv6-enabled kernel without an IPv6 > address on lo0 a realistic configuration for a "real" FreeBSD system? > If not, I'd think it worthwhile to make pointyhat more realistic. > (Either way, it seems unobjectionable to improve the robustness of > postfix, making it more liberal in what it accepts.) > > > Changing the jail configuration is possible but if a reasonable > > workaround can be made in postfix-current port I'd prefer not to > > touch pointyhat configuration (unexpected consequences and all > > that...) > > It may be a bit late in the 9.0 release cycle to be messing with the > pointyhat configuration, but an adjustment might be considered after > 9.0-RELEASE is done. "postfix-current" -- 2.9.20111012,4 has been unmarked BROKEN on amd64 and builds without incident. I hope the actual current version, ie postfix-2.9-20111117.tar.gz will be in the ports system soon. I would like to thank Sahil Tandon for his efforts in getting this valuable port problem corrected. Interestingly enough, and I cannot prove it to anyone's satisfaction, but I did mention to a colleague that if I posted on the ports forum regrading this problem and could get Wietse involved, the problem would be corrected within 24 hours. -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 13:49:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF31C1065672 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:49:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christer.solskogen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A13C8FC18 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:49:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwg14 with SMTP id 14so5015647wwg.31 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:49:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=k90CqD58qEt87a4IWa6AYVxCUgqWDOYaji/hETy8wyE=; b=dWcrtvqtPIlvxcm5rb8NCZVyFNhW/XxuD/p+FdwTfUPgLhMIj5PpvPanMk5m16msU3 5Pmg1xGRssocZrv6DuoBTqiPdZbjFD78Jg12P2B3tVBs8Opn3pgwFGZrj7nPlWSqn8r2 fwx03yHSaVBkMJILrZG+0VOhqrRsgcwtPc+s0= Received: by 10.180.14.134 with SMTP id p6mr3276930wic.25.1321624152104; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:49:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.195.204 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:48:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EC57AA2.9000104@FreeBSD.org> References: <4EC57AA2.9000104@FreeBSD.org> From: Christer Solskogen Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:48:51 +0100 Message-ID: To: Doug Barton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Albert Thiel , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND 9 question X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:49:14 -0000 On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > The ports, 10-current, stable/8 and stable/7 were all updated yesterday > shortly after ISC publicly released the code. But not releng/*? -- chs, From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 14:05:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B59106564A; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:05:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luchesar.iliev@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719338FC1B; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:05:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkbzs8 with SMTP id zs8so4673813bkb.13 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 06:05:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oVhrQKXTKlNU4ZDEhx8Vq0lTeC0zkYxI5bn0CL/K7s8=; b=W9Yano18/f+3H5hOBxtTTqym4ckoEozbITcqstitIvmgR9Hcx/bACJnbtk6FPyaAEy 9UFEjgMJjZfXGeWnApOP0msrzjhTrIEpYZv9mM7rj7u9sWGaujsh57rxn73JwhrEKbdE It/Ol9hNuAhcW/AIXVr8Lh9yS6QvXFTikNzBM= Received: by 10.205.130.1 with SMTP id hk1mr3525617bkc.68.1321625123245; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 06:05:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from [79.124.93.41] ([79.124.93.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a21sm5440176fao.18.2011.11.18.06.05.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 18 Nov 2011 06:05:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EC66620.5010308@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:05:20 +0200 From: "Luchesar V. ILIEV" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111108 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christer Solskogen References: <4EC57AA2.9000104@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=9A1FEEFF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Doug Barton , Albert Thiel , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND 9 question X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:05:25 -0000 On 18/11/2011 15:48, Christer Solskogen wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >> The ports, 10-current, stable/8 and stable/7 were all updated yesterday >> shortly after ISC publicly released the code. > > But not releng/*? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2011-November/006081.html HTH, Luchesar From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 14:13:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86821065670 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:13:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (m209-73.dsl.rawbw.com [198.144.209.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA758FC0C for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:13:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pAIEDLB8040050; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 06:13:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id pAIEDKm4040049; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 06:13:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 06:13:20 -0800 From: David Wolfskill To: Kostik Belousov Message-ID: <20111118141320.GV1706@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20111117194412.GP1706@albert.catwhisker.org> <20111118091146.GZ50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="B8YbZbqleQryf2nq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111118091146.GZ50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Support for running xterm within a jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:13:22 -0000 --B8YbZbqleQryf2nq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:11:46AM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > ... > I am sure that the issue is a misconfiguration of the jail or attempt to > start xterm from the process that has no control terminal. For jail > misconfiguration, I mean either failure to properly mount devfs into > the jail /dev, or a rule that hides /dev/tty from the jail. >=20 > I use very similar configuration (32bit stable/8 jail on amd64 stable/9 > kernel) and have no issues starting xterm. >=20 > That said, you should diagnose the issue further, otherwise I think the > patch is unneccessary. I appreciate that, but admit that I'm not especially familiar with working with jails. i also admit that the use case is one that strikes me as perverse, in that I would expect someone to run an xterm locally. In the case in question, the folks encountering the problem do not have local X servers; they use MS Windows (with which I am almost completely unfamiliar -- and in which I have no interest) on their desktops. As I type, I am logged in to my desktop machine at work remotely (from home, in another xterm). From that xterm, I can run (e.g.): dwolf-bsd(8.2-S)[10] ssh -Yfn dwolf-bsd xterm -T testing and get a new xterm up, running on my desktop with DISPLAY set to a value that will allow me to run other X clients from it. This is the functionality that is wanted. If, instead, I do something similar to one of our older build machines: dwolf-bsd(8.2-S)[11] ssh -Yfn dwolf.svl-lb xterm -T testing I get a similar result -- an xterm running on the build machine with DISPLAY set so I could run other X clients (e.g., emacs). If I do the same for one of the jails: dwolf-bsd(8.2-S)[12] ssh -Yfn svl-jail xterm -T testing dwolf-bsd(8.2-S)[13] xterm: Error 14, errno 2: No such file or directory Reason: spawn: open() failed on /dev/tty If I use ssh & login to the jail: dwolf-bsd(8.2-S)[13] ssh -Y svl-jail =2E.. svl-jail(7.1-R)[1]=20 I can manually fire off xterm because /dev/tty exists and I am already running an X server locally: svl-jail(7.1-R)[1] ls -lTio /dev/tty 135 crw--w---- 1 dwolf tty - 0, 135 Nov 18 05:59:58 2011 /dev/tty But if I terminate that connection, then try to perform that "ls" command (as the only thing I want ssh to do for me), that only works if I include the "-t" on the ssh invocation. So if I try adding -t when I try to start the remote xterm, I see: dwolf-bsd(8.2-S)[17] ssh -Ytfn svl-jail xterm -T testing Pseudo-terminal will not be allocated because stdin is not a terminal. dwolf-bsd(8.2-S)[18] xterm: Error 14, errno 2: No such file or directory Reason: spawn: open() failed on /dev/tty So I think it's apparent that we don't have a case where /dev/tty is never available, but I don't know how to make it show up for the intended use case. And there already exists code in xterm to ignore the ENOENT case for CygWin, so it seems that there really isn't much of a reason to treat ENOENT on /dev/tty as a fatal error for xterm invocation. Further, applying the patch in question does provide the desired functionality. If you (or anyone else) could provide some clues as to where to direct my attention, that would be wonderful. (In the mean time, upstream xterm developer has agreed to make the change for xterm-277, and ehaupt@ has updated the x11/xterm port to include the patch, pending xterm-277.) Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --B8YbZbqleQryf2nq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk7GaAAACgkQmprOCmdXAD3f6wCcDk7wr4A3dD5bWNDyNgAn6aHK 8OYAn2P+VPeFbuOBSoSLmZIVJk2ky2XW =/eAh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --B8YbZbqleQryf2nq-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 14:51:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA46106564A for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:51:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from mail.zoral.com.ua (mx0.zoral.com.ua [91.193.166.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677818FC13 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alf.home (alf.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.177]) by mail.zoral.com.ua (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id pAIEpAaB083594 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:51:10 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from alf.home (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alf.home (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pAIEpAcV018658; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:51:10 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by alf.home (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id pAIEpAcf018657; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:51:10 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: alf.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:51:10 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov To: David Wolfskill Message-ID: <20111118145110.GG50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20111117194412.GP1706@albert.catwhisker.org> <20111118091146.GZ50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20111118141320.GV1706@albert.catwhisker.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2m8r6DNGXlsmV3Rl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111118141320.GV1706@albert.catwhisker.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Support for running xterm within a jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:51:31 -0000 --2m8r6DNGXlsmV3Rl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 06:13:20AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:11:46AM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > ... > > I am sure that the issue is a misconfiguration of the jail or attempt to > > start xterm from the process that has no control terminal. For jail > > misconfiguration, I mean either failure to properly mount devfs into > > the jail /dev, or a rule that hides /dev/tty from the jail. > >=20 > > I use very similar configuration (32bit stable/8 jail on amd64 stable/9 > > kernel) and have no issues starting xterm. > >=20 > > That said, you should diagnose the issue further, otherwise I think the > > patch is unneccessary. >=20 > I appreciate that, but admit that I'm not especially familiar with > working with jails. i also admit that the use case is one that > strikes me as perverse, in that I would expect someone to run an > xterm locally. >=20 > In the case in question, the folks encountering the problem do not have > local X servers; they use MS Windows (with which I am almost completely > unfamiliar -- and in which I have no interest) on their desktops. >=20 > As I type, I am logged in to my desktop machine at work remotely (from > home, in another xterm). From that xterm, I can run (e.g.): >=20 > dwolf-bsd(8.2-S)[10] ssh -Yfn dwolf-bsd xterm -T testing >=20 > and get a new xterm up, running on my desktop with DISPLAY set to a > value that will allow me to run other X clients from it. This is the > functionality that is wanted. >=20 >=20 > If, instead, I do something similar to one of our older build machines: >=20 > dwolf-bsd(8.2-S)[11] ssh -Yfn dwolf.svl-lb xterm -T testing >=20 > I get a similar result -- an xterm running on the build machine with > DISPLAY set so I could run other X clients (e.g., emacs). >=20 >=20 > If I do the same for one of the jails: >=20 > dwolf-bsd(8.2-S)[12] ssh -Yfn svl-jail xterm -T testing > dwolf-bsd(8.2-S)[13] xterm: Error 14, errno 2: No such file or directory > Reason: spawn: open() failed on /dev/tty >=20 > If I use ssh & login to the jail: >=20 > dwolf-bsd(8.2-S)[13] ssh -Y svl-jail > ... > svl-jail(7.1-R)[1]=20 >=20 > I can manually fire off xterm because /dev/tty exists and I am already > running an X server locally: >=20 > svl-jail(7.1-R)[1] ls -lTio /dev/tty > 135 crw--w---- 1 dwolf tty - 0, 135 Nov 18 05:59:58 2011 /dev/tty >=20 >=20 > But if I terminate that connection, then try to perform that "ls" > command (as the only thing I want ssh to do for me), that only works if > I include the "-t" on the ssh invocation. >=20 > So if I try adding -t when I try to start the remote xterm, I see: >=20 > dwolf-bsd(8.2-S)[17] ssh -Ytfn svl-jail xterm -T testing > Pseudo-terminal will not be allocated because stdin is not a terminal. > dwolf-bsd(8.2-S)[18] xterm: Error 14, errno 2: No such file or directory > Reason: spawn: open() failed on /dev/tty >=20 >=20 > So I think it's apparent that we don't have a case where /dev/tty is > never available, but I don't know how to make it show up for the > intended use case. The ssh is explicitely saying you what is going on. Did you note the 'Pseudo-terminal will not be allocated because stdin is not a terminal.' line ?=20 It telling that the control terminal will not be allocated. As a consequenc= e, /dev/tty cannot be opened. This has nothing to do with jail. % ssh -Ytfn localhost tty Pseudo-terminal will not be allocated because stdin is not a terminal. not a tty % >=20 > And there already exists code in xterm to ignore the ENOENT case for > CygWin, so it seems that there really isn't much of a reason to treat > ENOENT on /dev/tty as a fatal error for xterm invocation. Further, > applying the patch in question does provide the desired functionality. >=20 > If you (or anyone else) could provide some clues as to where to direct > my attention, that would be wonderful. >=20 > (In the mean time, upstream xterm developer has agreed to make the > change for xterm-277, and ehaupt@ has updated the x11/xterm port to > include the patch, pending xterm-277.) >=20 > Peace, > david > --=20 > David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org > Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil. >=20 > See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --2m8r6DNGXlsmV3Rl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk7GcN4ACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4ig8wCg3BsyD6hyiV+170FGHoDLbWDg 5JAAn3NE6tO1zeWLTUplhBP4yUdNPC3z =snZe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2m8r6DNGXlsmV3Rl-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 15:57:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639FC106566B for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:57:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com) Received: from idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca (idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F4A8FC0C for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:57:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pd2ml3so-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.141.148]) by pd4mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 18 Nov 2011 08:42:57 -0700 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=1h8qd3w5pbyJS47frJc7V6h9QwwiBhgsQMy9mbCO+wA= c=1 sm=1 a=QrugwKR0C_UA:10 a=wAGQQ9Az6v0A:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=ICAaq7hcmGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=2Er20JxOMs3KTlR2XTlUiQ==:17 a=40EnbplkAAAA:8 a=BWvPGDcYAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=Ve1JEfWOS3QrQ-pzEcEA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=V7tsTZBp22UA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Received: from unknown (HELO spqr.komquats.com) ([24.68.73.211]) by pd2ml3so-dmz.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 18 Nov 2011 08:42:57 -0700 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy2 [10.1.2.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE2C46B6C for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:42:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from slippy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pAIFguLP008283 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:42:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com) Message-Id: <201111181542.pAIFguLP008283@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3 From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.komquats.com/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:42:56 -0800 Subject: Makefile Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Cy Schubert List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:57:58 -0000 Hi everyone, Can anyone enlighten me as to why this following make fragment doesn't work? It falls through to .else. PKGNAMESUFFIX= -devel .if defined(PKGNAMESUFFIX) && !empty(PKGNAMESUFFIX) MASTER_SITES= http://www.fwbuilder.org/nightly_builds/fwbuilder-5.0/build- ${BUILD}/ PORTVERSION= ${DISTVERSION}.b${BUILD} .else MASTER_SITES= SF/${PORTNAME}/Current_Packages/${PORTVERSION} DISTVERSIONSUFFIX= .${BUILD} .endif If I replace PKGNAMESUFFIX= -devel and the .if defined... with PKGNAMESUFFIX= "-devel" .if defined(PKGNAMESUFFIX) && ${PKGNAMESUFFIX} == "-devel" it works. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 17:21:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550AF1065673; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:21:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@beardz.net) Received: from svr06-mx.btshosting.co.uk (mx-2.btshosting.co.uk [178.63.196.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09EC78FC13; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:21:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.65] (027ecff8.bb.sky.com [2.126.207.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by svr06-mx.btshosting.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 226B441ECF; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:21:05 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=beardz.net; s=default; t=1321636865; bh=tV2XjKVI/P5Up5tOfWtolepVDUMlwNcJtXbsN5csxyI=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=PslXfgYXhMR+ZOmH3ivMQHGtlP10RTb5EQ5sPqtvhyki9coGYait8gu99RzoODNbL F8ZzEme1vC6887+R0JwHr2i4ccNYYkRsPHyrblOK23m/BTgkWkdOhV7on9NufN9f36 1Ddk9rmagGrh9IpVlPytp/XLtvDX7pjs/jPhORFU= Message-ID: <4EC693FB.1010409@beardz.net> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:20:59 +0000 From: Jase Thew User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: perryh@pluto.rain.com References: <3SkrRf563xzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> <1321560805.6735.15.camel@hood.oook.cz> <4ec64621.5VnWOe6lq5n/i0BQ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4ec64621.5VnWOe6lq5n/i0BQ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: wietse@porcupine.org, lists@opsec.eu, sahil+freebsd-ports@tandon.net, garga@freebsd.org, freebsd@beardz.net, pav@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, utisoft@gmail.com Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:21:07 -0000 On 18/11/2011 11:48, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Pav Lucistnik wrote: > >> The build jails are configured to have only IPv4 address on lo0, >> but the host have both IPv4 and IPv6 configured on its lo0. > > Even disregarding RFC3513, is an IPv6-enabled kernel without an IPv6 > address on lo0 a realistic configuration for a "real" FreeBSD system? > If not, I'd think it worthwhile to make pointyhat more realistic. > (Either way, it seems unobjectionable to improve the robustness of > postfix, making it more liberal in what it accepts.) > FreeBSD jails only expose the IP addresses they are configured to use. So if you have an IPv6 enabled host (which is the default) with jails that are configured with only IPv4 addresses, then yes, it is very realistic. Furthermore, by default, jails don't have any v4 addresses assigned to the loopback interface - 127.0.0.1 and inaddr_loopback are automagically aliased to the primary v4 IP assigned to the jail. Jase. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 19:01:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E84106564A; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:01:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC028FC08; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAIJ1Uu1073757; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:01:30 GMT (envelope-from glebius@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id pAIJ1T43073745; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:01:29 GMT (envelope-from glebius) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:01:29 GMT Message-Id: <201111181901.pAIJ1T43073745@freefall.freebsd.org> To: lichray@gmail.com, glebius@FreeBSD.org, glebius@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org From: glebius@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/162665: [patch] [update] graphics/pinpoint to 0.1.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:01:30 -0000 Synopsis: [patch] [update] graphics/pinpoint to 0.1.4 Responsible-Changed-From-To: glebius->freebsd-ports Responsible-Changed-By: glebius Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Nov 18 19:01:15 UTC 2011 Responsible-Changed-Why: Back to ports. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=162665 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 19:10:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5046D106564A for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:10:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FBC98FC0C for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAIJAAoO077094 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:10:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id pAIJAAUw077093; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:10:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:10:10 GMT Message-Id: <201111181910.pAIJAAUw077093@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org From: Zhihao Yuan Cc: Subject: Re: ports/162665: [patch] [update] graphics/pinpoint to 0.1.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Zhihao Yuan List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:10:10 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/162665; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Zhihao Yuan To: bug-followup@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/162665: [patch] [update] graphics/pinpoint to 0.1.4 Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:08:09 -0600 --000e0cd1e058c8ad6b04b2070e68 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 1. pkg-plist should not included any LICENSE file; bsd.port.mk will do it. 2. This should be upgrade after ports/159928 (clutter upgrade), which is hang by gnome@, so I can neither accept nor deny your work, sorry... -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___________________________________________________ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/ --000e0cd1e058c8ad6b04b2070e68 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
1. pkg-plist should not included any=C2=A0LICENSE=C2=A0file; = bsd.port.mk will do it.
2. This should be upgrade after=C2=A0ports/159928 (clutter upgrade), w= hich is hang by gnome@, so I can neither accept nor deny your work, sorry..= .

--
Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray
The best way = to predict the future is to invent it.
___________________________________________________
4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/
--000e0cd1e058c8ad6b04b2070e68-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 19:18:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BA8106566B; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miwi@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA468FC0A; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:18:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAIJIKiT087052; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:18:20 GMT (envelope-from miwi@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from miwi@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id pAIJIKl4087048; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:18:20 GMT (envelope-from miwi) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:18:20 GMT Message-Id: <201111181918.pAIJIKl4087048@freefall.freebsd.org> To: lichray@gmail.com, miwi@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, miwi@FreeBSD.org From: miwi@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/162665: [patch] [update] graphics/pinpoint to 0.1.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:18:20 -0000 Synopsis: [patch] [update] graphics/pinpoint to 0.1.4 Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->miwi Responsible-Changed-By: miwi Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Nov 18 19:18:19 UTC 2011 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'll take it. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=162665 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 19:48:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848761065678 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:48:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B84B150ED2; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4EC6B68C.1060706@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:48:28 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111110 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Luchesar V. ILIEV" References: <4EC57AA2.9000104@FreeBSD.org> <4EC66620.5010308@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4EC66620.5010308@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Christer Solskogen , Albert Thiel , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND 9 question X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:48:42 -0000 On 11/18/2011 06:05, Luchesar V. ILIEV wrote: > On 18/11/2011 15:48, Christer Solskogen wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >>> The ports, 10-current, stable/8 and stable/7 were all updated yesterday >>> shortly after ISC publicly released the code. >> >> But not releng/*? I cannot emphasize this point highly enough: The BIND in the base is intended primarily for use as a local resolver. If you are doing serious, mission-critical work with BIND you should be using a port, preferably dns/bind98. The ability to quickly update in the event of a security issue is one reason, another is the ability to use the same version of BIND across your network regardless of the underlying version of FreeBSD. If you are in any way worried that your flavor of FreeBSD isn't being upgraded soon enough, you are (by definition) in the category that should be using BIND from ports instead. hth, Doug -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 19 09:53:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABFFC1065672; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 09:53:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christer.solskogen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190508FC08; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 09:53:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwg14 with SMTP id 14so6496080wwg.31 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 01:53:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=CcD4IW7MbuokjLZ4t7qSDF8h/lFZijsHNzK3KvrP548=; b=RI+5KoqOoNiG5jaa0cEI6/gv2gKt6pKvg54g43YWED8CUJ8WGEQKtUa24jOJYg9sIT 8oyx2ihijpu6xRbVTR+QsqdCFRIy9N/3RnmxxGsQLvH99XT5pJzXi6Cwh8KKcSBFLFfA TkiB7xc+m7HWCT35FWudE7PsOV4nkuAwLv3fY= Received: by 10.227.206.6 with SMTP id fs6mr223277wbb.0.1321696404548; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 01:53:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.195.204 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 01:53:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EC6B68C.1060706@FreeBSD.org> References: <4EC57AA2.9000104@FreeBSD.org> <4EC66620.5010308@gmail.com> <4EC6B68C.1060706@FreeBSD.org> From: Christer Solskogen Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:53:04 +0100 Message-ID: To: Doug Barton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "Luchesar V. ILIEV" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Albert Thiel Subject: Re: BIND 9 question X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 09:53:28 -0000 On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > I cannot emphasize this point highly enough: Point is very very taken :-) -- chs, From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 19 10:55:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B884106566B for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:55:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (dns1.vizion2000.net [62.49.197.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C46F8FC08 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 1BF15119C26; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 01:54:00 -0800 (PST) From: David Southwell Organization: Vision Communications To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 01:53:59 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-RELEASE; KDE/4.7.3; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201111190153.59986.david@vizion2000.net> Subject: epson r2400/2880 printers on freebsd8.2 amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:55:38 -0000 Hi Anyone up to date on how to do high quality printing with epson inkjet printers (in my case r2400 and r2880) on freebsd8.2 amd64 systems. print/pips* reports they require 386 and do not compile on amd64. Thanks in advance for useful pointers David From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 19 11:40:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4D71065676; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de) Received: from smtp.kn-bremen.de (gelbbaer.kn-bremen.de [78.46.108.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16ADB8FC0A; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:40:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kn-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id DE3901E000F6; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 12:40:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from triton8.kn-bremen.de (noident@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by triton8.kn-bremen.de (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pAJBbJ52021290; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 12:37:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nox@triton8.kn-bremen.de) Received: (from nox@localhost) by triton8.kn-bremen.de (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id pAJBbJoq021289; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 12:37:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nox) From: Juergen Lock Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 12:37:19 +0100 To: freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20111119113719.GA20783@triton8.kn-bremen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: mickael.maillot@gmail.com Subject: xbmc pvr in ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:40:21 -0000 Hi! So I learned there are actually releases of xbmc pvr already, which means nothing should stop us from committing it to ports too? :) Now I'm wondering if this needs to be repocopied from the xbmc port first since it's kind of a fork... Few patches still apply and I see libreoffice also wasn't repocopied from openoffice, so maybe not? The patch against the xbmc port is here: http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/xbmc-pvr-ppa-odk55.patch (I just see I haven't added CONFLICTS_INSTALL with xbmc yet, will do that later.) It still seems to work with my older xvdr addon and vdr plugin ports, but maybe I should update those again too before committing: http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/xbmc-addon-xvdr.shar http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/vdr-plugin-xvdr.shar Of course everyone is welcome to test... :) (I only tested with vdr, not with mythtv.) Juergen PS: I haven't seen comments from the xbmc port maintainer yet tho (Cc'd; I also couldn't get hold of him on irc), so I don't know if he wants to maintain xbmc pvr too. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 19 14:23:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51C5106564A for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:23:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17018FC0A for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:23:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfl10 with SMTP id fl10so386946vcb.13 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 06:23:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=KYHqTBEw7BEfsyLU1ZYd3gvvpmZx53hc1r0gwiVfv8w=; b=CWvgmLJxaxma3KnYkjN908fguLJ+3PP52bR/yIkb+Pgfz4HpRVoKbx7s3+CZOE4Tyy 9ybnjqrPuoggRnBhrCEO/oxliic0mnnzzrk4LY1Hrc1cM85nKfMuosO7fIrxkHJ9NZHr J5zdBNyfAksLCKaKrzg+xd/rVDpKKPbNmycU4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.35.70 with SMTP id f6mr7949692vdj.84.1321712633962; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 06:23:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.113.168 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 06:23:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201111190153.59986.david@vizion2000.net> References: <201111190153.59986.david@vizion2000.net> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:23:53 +0100 Message-ID: From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: epson r2400/2880 printers on freebsd8.2 amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:23:55 -0000 Hello, On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:53 AM, David Southwell wrote: > Hi > > Anyone up to date on how to do high quality printing with epson inkjet > printers (in my case r2400 and r2880) on freebsd8.2 amd64 systems. print/pips* > reports > they require 386 and do not compile on amd64. > > Thanks in advance for useful pointers FWIW, I got pipslite (mostly) working with my Epson printer, see this thread: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=23793 I haven't fixed the last snags with the install yet, so I haven't made a port of it. I don't know if your printer is supported. Also don't know if pipslite does high quality enough. HTH -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 19 15:12:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549ED106566B for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:12:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Received: from astart2.astart.com (99-111-96-109.uvs.sndgca.sbcglobal.net [99.111.96.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7108FC1C for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:12:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop_81.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by astart2.astart.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAJEiTaU096804 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 06:44:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Message-ID: <4EC7C0CC.4090105@astart.com> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 06:44:28 -0800 From: Patrick Powell Organization: Astart Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110312 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <201111190153.59986.david@vizion2000.net> In-Reply-To: <201111190153.59986.david@vizion2000.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: epson r2400/2880 printers on freebsd8.2 amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: papowell@astart.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:12:10 -0000 On 11/19/11 01:53, David Southwell wrote: > Hi > > Anyone up to date on how to do high quality printing with epson inkjet > printers (in my case r2400 and r2880) on freebsd8.2 amd64 systems. print/pips* > reports > they require 386 and do not compile on amd64. > > Thanks in advance for useful pointers > > David > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > If you comment out ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386 in /usr/ports/print/pips800/Makefile.pips you can get it to compile. HOWEVER: there are a slew of warnings about 'cast from pointer to integer of different size' that may cause much grief and pain. Most of these appear to be generated in the GTK library, and apparently by the use of a cast to implement the 'offsetof' capability. Good luck... -- Patrick Powell Astart Technologies papowell@astart.com 1530 Jamacha Road, Suite X, Network and System San Diego, CA 92019 Consulting 858-874-6543 Web Site: www.astart.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 19 16:40:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886A41065672 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:40:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailnull@mips.inka.de) Received: from mail-in-16.arcor-online.net (mail-in-16.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413238FC08 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:40:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-in-10-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-10-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.27]) by mx.arcor.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A45808AF6 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:09:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-in-17.arcor-online.net (mail-in-17.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.57]) by mail-in-10-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919E6C6 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:09:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (dslb-092-075-204-146.pools.arcor-ip.net [92.75.204.146]) by mail-in-17.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6943610D792 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:09:27 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-17.arcor-online.net 6943610D792 Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pAJG9Pnt055845 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:09:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mailnull@lorvorc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id pAJG9Ptb055844 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:09:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mailnull) From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:09:25 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20111115094823.GA9461@sh4-5.1blu.de> <4EC2466B.3020808@infracaninophile.co.uk> Originator: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs checkout ./. csup X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:40:26 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > Efficiency, basically. csup should require less bandwidth and put less > load on servers than using cvs directly. It works like rsync, Actually, csup is much more efficient than rsync because it can cache the meta information and so doesn't have to perform a stat() on each file. That doesn't matter so much on the client (compare plain csup vs. csup -s), but it is quite significant on the server. And anon cvs is just an enormous hog on the server side. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 19 16:45:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D27810656AA for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:45:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailnull@mips.inka.de) Received: from mail-in-16.arcor-online.net (mail-in-16.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2632A8FC08 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-in-15-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-15-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.32]) by mx.arcor.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DBF486F9 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:11:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-in-17.arcor-online.net (mail-in-17.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.57]) by mail-in-15-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B49D33E112 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:11:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (dslb-092-075-204-146.pools.arcor-ip.net [92.75.204.146]) by mail-in-17.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA0CBCC3EE for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:11:25 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-17.arcor-online.net BA0CBCC3EE Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pAJGBOaq055908 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:11:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mailnull@lorvorc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id pAJGBOkl055907 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:11:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mailnull) From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:11:24 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20111115094823.GA9461@sh4-5.1blu.de> <20111116155924.00c6a41f@cox.net> Originator: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs checkout ./. csup X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:45:26 -0000 Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > Then use cvs to update your /usr/{src,ports,doc} trees from your local > copy of the CVS repo. Note that having a local CVS repo also eliminates the > need to use the pserver access method, if you're updating on the same > machine where the repo resides. You can also export the repository by NFS to other machines nearby. A "local" checkout from an NFS file system is more efficient than cvs's remote handling. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 19 18:42:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C843106564A; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:42:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sup.oook.cz (sup.oook.cz [94.23.0.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C753C8FC15; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:42:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.23] (ip-78-102-160-251.net.upcbroadband.cz [78.102.160.251]) (authenticated bits=0) by sup.oook.cz (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAJIg3jC042405; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:42:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) From: Pav Lucistnik To: Wietse Venema In-Reply-To: <3SkvVw2ZYzzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> References: <3SkvVw2ZYzzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vRdVSo67+iaC6XOYw+5A" Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:42:02 +0100 Message-ID: <1321728122.46494.0.camel@hood.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 94.23.0.135 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: sup.oook.cz; Sender-ip: 78.102.160.251; Sender-helo: [192.168.0.23]; ) Cc: Sahil Tandon , Renato Botelho , Jase Thew , Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:42:09 -0000 --=-vRdVSo67+iaC6XOYw+5A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wietse Venema p=ED=B9e v =E8t 17. 11. 2011 v 15:41 -0500: > Pav Lucistnik: > > Wietse Venema p??e v ?t 17. 11. 2011 v 13:23 -0500: > > > Actually, a Postfix built-in default setting changed on 20110918. > > >=20 > > > It now enables IPv6 unless this is turned off in a configuration > > > file. I can fix that at compile time, and thereby not trigger > > > the error on build systems with unexpected IPv6 configurations. > >=20 > > This is interesting. > >=20 > > The build jails are configured to have only IPv4 address on lo0, > > but the host have both IPv4 and IPv6 configured on its lo0. > >=20 > > Changing the jail configuration is possible but if a reasonable > > workaround can be made in postfix-current port I'd prefer not to touch > > pointyhat configuration (unexpected consequences and all that...) >=20 > I can competely fix this specific error instance with a one-line > config file change, but I don't want to end up in the same boat > again when some other program needs to be run during build time. >=20 > A more proactive workaround would be to treat "protocol not supported" > as a non-fatal error, just like "address family not supported" is. >=20 > Please let me know if this works in the build cluster. It will log > a warning but that should be justfied, because the system does have > an abnormal configuration. Yes, this works on the build cluster. Sahil, can I commit it to the port? > Wietse >=20 > *** src/util/inet_proto.c- Tue Jan 8 15:36:13 2008 > --- src/util/inet_proto.c Thu Nov 17 08:49:31 2011 > *************** > *** 219,225 **** > pf->dns_atype_list =3D make_unsigned_vector(3, T_A, T_AAAA, 0); > pf->sa_family_list =3D make_uchar_vector(3, AF_INET, AF_INET6, 0); > break; > ! } else if (errno =3D=3D EAFNOSUPPORT) { > msg_warn("%s: IPv6 support is disabled: %m", context); > msg_warn("%s: configuring for IPv4 support only", context); > /* FALLTHROUGH */ > --- 219,225 ---- > pf->dns_atype_list =3D make_unsigned_vector(3, T_A, T_AAAA, 0); > pf->sa_family_list =3D make_uchar_vector(3, AF_INET, AF_INET6, 0); > break; > ! } else if (errno =3D=3D EAFNOSUPPORT || errno =3D=3D EPROTONOSUPPORT) = { > msg_warn("%s: IPv6 support is disabled: %m", context); > msg_warn("%s: configuring for IPv4 support only", context); > /* FALLTHROUGH */ --=20 --=20 Pav Lucistnik Why does the Earth have colors? --=-vRdVSo67+iaC6XOYw+5A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk7H+GcACgkQntdYP8FOsoIo8gCfdMSyNbMTwt+VsPwOo/DAO8QY +yMAniB3ZPZPzuPivrqF0EvKHZ7wgfnh =2WKD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vRdVSo67+iaC6XOYw+5A-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 19 20:47:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CCF106566C; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:47:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from spartan.hamla.org (spartan.hamla.org [206.251.255.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898F88FC14; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2791711F; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:47:42 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tandon.net; h= user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:subject:from:from:date:date:received:received; s=aegis; t=1321735661; bh=34jQlPb05CSV3DQEx+7WA5PSre88tzrBwm1m8TJZthI=; b= UyY72gDF4NlyajpyfEnjqTu0mqgXdyzaV1VhKs8DUcCiy8I9GtRURTEqcLtNPpRN Ylip1uRdQf7q7szjxh9nHgVhDJqTbAS99SOYRcOFF0C20Wyiv2GgRFxde9SBUrOY l2uH8KfQc5uasToinALzz6+mz0PFd7l3xLXmbb54QNQ= X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at spartan.hamla.org Received: from spartan.hamla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spartan.hamla.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with LMTP id wxYJJ8PSJHGk; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:47:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from magic.hamla.org (cpe-68-174-92-20.nyc.res.rr.com [68.174.92.20]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C56E3170F9; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:47:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:48:11 -0500 From: Sahil Tandon To: Pav Lucistnik Message-ID: <20111119204811.GA24792@magic.hamla.org> References: <3SkvVw2ZYzzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> <1321728122.46494.0.camel@hood.oook.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1321728122.46494.0.camel@hood.oook.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Wietse Venema , Sahil Tandon , Renato Botelho , Jase Thew , Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:47:12 -0000 --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 19:42:02 +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Wietse Venema p=C3=AD=C5=A1e v =C4=8Dt 17. 11. 2011 v 15:41 -0500: > > Pav Lucistnik: > > > Wietse Venema p??e v ?t 17. 11. 2011 v 13:23 -0500: > > > > Actually, a Postfix built-in default setting changed on 20110918. > > > >=20 > > > > It now enables IPv6 unless this is turned off in a configuration > > > > file. I can fix that at compile time, and thereby not trigger > > > > the error on build systems with unexpected IPv6 configurations. > > >=20 > > > This is interesting. > > >=20 > > > The build jails are configured to have only IPv4 address on lo0, > > > but the host have both IPv4 and IPv6 configured on its lo0. > > >=20 > > > Changing the jail configuration is possible but if a reasonable > > > workaround can be made in postfix-current port I'd prefer not to touch > > > pointyhat configuration (unexpected consequences and all that...) > >=20 > > I can competely fix this specific error instance with a one-line > > config file change, but I don't want to end up in the same boat > > again when some other program needs to be run during build time. > >=20 > > A more proactive workaround would be to treat "protocol not supported" > > as a non-fatal error, just like "address family not supported" is. > >=20 > > Please let me know if this works in the build cluster. It will log > > a warning but that should be justfied, because the system does have > > an abnormal configuration. >=20 > Yes, this works on the build cluster. >=20 > Sahil, can I commit it to the port? Wietse has made the change upstream and I plan to commit that in a little bit. Just running it through my tinderbox if folks don't mind the wait (a few hours). --=20 Sahil Tandon --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOyBYLAAoJENvQYAHAFtl3pd8IALqdONTiiDWjgY4wfNvT7Hsc jMPB+vm0BTSmIAXThSAwdbs0hX0gNZt+9fFLgC9mLC2lIrvrfAMQE2BUg4zm6FZZ OiQlnn9nXOyE7KeIAEU0pNXRAzO5kRlVLeLb+OmkPD264AYlw8dhYvJBugBJWzPA ZB9P1nmXmxLHFHdBAAfyftyN9phsRRViEWMiOuNtUK3/r0uKovBOw5Ouq2Ql/2uV HoM16MgqSHjQoZzTqWYBipB3EWfo7mroTAkhS2ZsNxQ3Fn6QtnyXmEF+G26qX98o MEAFbRjBz1TSh/HiiRkxfTM3P5PNDo165+CJ+ZBZ8EZsEc03k/w7S/oZLKsW9mM= =+tns -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 19 22:48:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8E41065670 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 22:48:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bbtruk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84AE8FC14 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 22:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwg14 with SMTP id 14so7317282wwg.31 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:48:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kp0z7hctFZc9pSWxBufNcWzdpvoR4LuNluGlC6WqEYo=; b=AQFYrVgfU6NPttCkVkubwlRjzsipaizM5oqZzfj/rz6CjcB+blMUqtEvaBaeqR3LBL jq+7ICOtkApRhVE1m6UIku+F+O9Y+3/nVZUJInrI6U0HnpGsrdXgngfSG2jbBTMHIFFq RKQUQTMPF2jEPFL3bzrVPhmhmTIpqYUH1bXs4= Received: by 10.227.202.70 with SMTP id fd6mr5365548wbb.27.1321742882819; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:48:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from ss-benat.saindua.dyndns.org (221.85-86-7.dynamic.clientes.euskaltel.es. [85.86.7.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k5sm2632263wiz.9.2011.11.19.14.48.00 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:48:01 -0800 (PST) Sender: Benat Gonzalez Etxepare Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 23:47:58 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Be=F1at?= Gonzalez Etxepare To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20111119234758.e4a46127.bbtruk@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <4EB9771C.5080006@cassiba.com> References: <20111108180947.288e9a42.bbtruk@users.sourceforge.net> <4EB9771C.5080006@cassiba.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.2 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: sam@cassiba.com Subject: Re: Slave ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 22:48:04 -0000 > There are some ports under net-p2p that have qt and gtk slave ports. A > couple others I can think of off the top of my head are apache22 and > php5. Those areas should be good starting places to look over to give > you an idea of how to do it. Sorry for not answering sooner, but I have not been able to study in depth earlier the examples you told me. Now, after having tried to understand better what slave ports are, I am not sure they are the right way to handle my problem. From my understanding they are used between different configurations or parts of the same application, so they share almost entirely the same Makefile. In my case, I need to compile a new port (Double Commander, a file manager) which depends in some other totally different port (Lazarus, an IDE). With Lazarus you are able to compile applications for the toolkit you choose: QT or GTK2. Lazarus itself is compiled using one of them (which can be selected using Makefile's options). All programs compiled with Lazarus should use the same toolkit as the IDE. For this, I can get the selected option from a configuration file (written by Lazarus port) using the != assignment, but it is discouraged. So I need to do it some other way. Are slave ports suited for this (getting a chosen option from some other port)? or is there some other way to solve this? If I'm not being very clear with my problem, tell me and I will try to explain better, because right now I am quite lost at how to solve this in the right way.