From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 30 01:01:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28EE2106564A for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 01:01:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72908FC0A for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 01:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0U11Oli029976; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 01:01:24 GMT Received: from orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (80-45-152-196.static.dsl.as9105.com [80.45.152.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0U11N5w029972; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 01:01:23 GMT Received: by orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 38DAC33C3D; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 01:01:23 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 01:01:23 +0000 From: Frank Shute To: Joseph Olatt Message-ID: <20110130010123.GA93025@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <20110129050836.GA26596@shell.eskimo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110129050836.GA26596@shell.eskimo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-RC2 amd64 X-Organisation: 'shute.org.uk' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/ports/x11-wm/awesome problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 01:01:29 -0000 On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 09:08:36PM -0800, Joseph Olatt wrote: > > Hi, > > Anybody on the list having recent problems with the awesome window > manager? I get the following error when I try to run awesome: > > W: awesome: image_new_from_file:288: cannot load image /usr/local/share/awesome/icons/awesome16.png: unknown error, that's really bad > /usr/local/share/awesome/lib/awful/menu.lua:221: attempt to compare number with nil > W: awesome: image_new_from_file:288: cannot load image /usr/local/share/awesome/icons/awesome16.png: unknown error, that's really bad > /usr/local/share/awesome/lib/awful/menu.lua:221: attempt to compare number with nil > > > > /usr/local/share/awesome/icons/awesome16.png exists, is readable and can > be displayed fine with display(1). > > > I did csup the ports tree and recompiled both awesome and imlib2, but > did not succeed. > > > The entire output of startx is: > > X.Org X Server 1.7.5 > Release Date: 2010-02-16 > X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 > Build Operating System: FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE i386 > Current Operating System: FreeBSD mint 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE #0: Fri Jan 21 05:05:00 CST 2011 root@mint:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MINT i386 > Build Date: 27 January 2011 07:56:40PM > > Current version of pixman: 0.18.4 > Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org > to make sure that you have the latest version. > Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, > (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, > (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. > (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Fri Jan 28 21:43:23 2011 > (==) Using default built-in configuration (30 lines) > (EE) Failed to load module "fbdev" (module does not exist, 0) > NTSC > XRANDR name: VGA-0 > Connector: VGA > CRT1: INTERNAL_DAC1 > DDC reg: 0x60 > XRANDR name: DVI-0 > Connector: DVI-D > DFP1: INTERNAL_TMDS1 > DDC reg: 0x64 > XRANDR name: LVDS > Connector: LVDS > LCD1: INTERNAL_LVDS > DDC reg: 0x6c > XRANDR name: S-video > Connector: S-video > TV1: INTERNAL_DAC2 > DDC reg: 0x0 > finished output detect: 0 > finished output detect: 1 > finished output detect: 2 > finished output detect: 3 > finished all detect > Entering TV Save > Save TV timing tables > saveTimingTables: reading timing tables > TV Save done > disable primary dac > disable FP1 > disable TV > init memmap > init common > init crtc1 > init pll1 > restore memmap > restore common > restore crtc1 > restore pll1 > set RMX > set LVDS > enable LVDS > disable primary dac > disable FP1 > disable TV > record: RECORD extension enabled at configure time. > record: This extension is known to be broken, disabling extension now.. > record: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20500 > W: awesome: image_new_from_file:288: cannot load image /usr/local/share/awesome/icons/awesome16.png: unknown error, that's really bad > /usr/local/share/awesome/lib/awful/menu.lua:221: attempt to compare number with nil > W: awesome: image_new_from_file:288: cannot load image /usr/local/share/awesome/icons/awesome16.png: unknown error, that's really bad > /usr/local/share/awesome/lib/awful/menu.lua:221: attempt to compare number with nil > E: awesome: main:505: couldn't find any rc file Missing rc file. Copy and edit the example one distributed in the package/port to your $HOME. Hopefully, that will get rid of most of the warnings. > > waiting for X server to shut down xmessage: not found > xmessage: not found > finished PLL2 > finished PLL1 > Entering Restore TV > Restore TV PLL > Restore TVHV > Restore TV Restarts > Restore Timing Tables > Restore TV standard > Leaving Restore TV > Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 30 05:55:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4193D106564A for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 05:55:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D9D8FC0C for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 05:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.186]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E425C44 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:02:49 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D44FC9B.5010404@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:52:27 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101227 Thunderbird/3.0.11 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4D437DD6.4030202@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: PF firewall rules and documentation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 05:55:45 -0000 On 01/29/11 23:50, Iñigo Ortiz de Urbina wrote: > I think that kind of user should never be in charge of anything security related > Reading my own post I realise I forgot my question due to kiddie issues that were occuring in my vicinity. That is, how would one go about this? As for user suitability, how else does one learn if not through practice? > On 1/29/11, Da Rock wrote: > >> I spent some time playing with pf and pf.conf, and followed the >> directions in the handbook. It redirected me to the openbsd site for >> pf.conf, and recommended it as the most comprehensive documentation for pf. >> >> Firstly, I didn't find that. I had to translate the instructions into >> the current version used in FreeBSD, OpenBSD appears to be further >> advanced than this based on the current docs. >> >> Secondly, some of the rules don't appear to be following. From my >> understanding based on the documentation in the handbook and on the site >> pf is default allowing traffic. So explicit rules to block should be set >> first and then rules set to allow what is needed in. Some assumptions >> are made in the rules by the interpreter, so according to OpenBSD one >> can (even in the older versions) simply state block and it is >> interpreted as 'block on $interfaces all'. This turned out to not be the >> case. >> >> I know this has come up before, but I think it might be time to document >> pf.conf properly. It seems to be a bit of security risk not to. Users >> may be mistaken in their belief of their security on the network using >> pf, and may be less likely to trust again when it breaks. >> >> Cheers >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 30 09:27:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8E9106564A; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:27:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87498FC0C; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:27:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [93.104.82.115] (helo=localhost.my.domain) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PjTZ2-0003Hh-Gb; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:27:21 +0100 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p0U9RIJH011178; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:27:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id p0U9RIf2011177; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:27:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:27:17 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110130092717.GA11156@tinyCurrent> References: <20110125132757.GA3479@current.Sisis.de> <20110126134015.GA1709@current.Sisis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20110126134015.GA1709@current.Sisis.de> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 93.104.82.115 Cc: Subject: Re: snd_es137x && no recording from headset micro X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:27:23 -0000 El día Wednesday, January 26, 2011 a las 02:40:15PM +0100, Matthias Apitz escribió: > > $ cat /dev/sndstat > > FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 32bit 2007061600/i386) > > Installed devices: > > pcm0: at io 0x2040 irq 16 kld snd_es137x [MPSAFE] (2p:4v/1r:4v channels duplex default) > > > > i.e. there is only pcm0 and no pcm1 (should it?) > > I did some more tests and have now a clear picture: > > 1) > in Win7 you can control (System-control-->Sound-->Input) the input > devices (build-in micro ./. headset micro), you can test them there and > you can define which one is the default; if you set 'headset micro' as > default and pull it out, the default switches to build-in micro and back > again if you plug it in again; > > 2) > if you start the VM while a) headset micro is pluged-in and b) set as > default, the recording in Skype works from headset micro; YES, it works! > > 3) > if you pull out the headset micro, the recording (also in the VM with > Skype) falls back to build-in micro; but you can't switch back by > pluging it in again, is stays with build-in micro; even a FreeBSD guest > system reboot does not change it back; only a restart of VMWare bring > the headset micro again as default; > > It looks like a bug in VMWare or Win7, I think, and nothing we could > address here in FreeBSD world, or? > > Just for the record, se also http://communities.vmware.com/thread/300335 One last note to end this thread here: 4) If you plug-in the headset micro and disable in Win7 the build-in micro, sound gets recorded in the FreeBSD guest again from the headset micro. This is not a fine solution, but a least a workaround. matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 30 14:52:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A5B1065673 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E078FC18 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:52:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.186]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id C692C5C44 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:59:28 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D457A34.30306@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:48:20 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101227 Thunderbird/3.0.11 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: linux PF_PACKET compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:52:24 -0000 "In recent versions of the Linux kernel (post-2.0 releases) a new protocol family has been introduced, named PF_PACKET. This family allows an application to send and receive packets dealing directly with the network card driver, thus avoiding the usual protocol stack-handling (e.g., IP/TCP or IP/UDP processing). That is, any packet sent through the socket will be directly passed to the Ethernet interface, and any packet received through the interface will be directly passed to the application." I've been chasing the answer to a FreeBSD version of this (approx. anyway), but I needed to find out what exactly PF_PACKET was first. Finally found this answer here: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/4659 I looked up man socket and I can see possibilities (in my mind anyway), but I thought I'd be best to check if the gurus here might have a better idea. My reason for this is I'm attempting to build l2tpns (which supposedly builds on 7.2?! with no trouble), and I'm chasing the errors which appear to be linuxisms mostly. So in man socket simply looking at the list of protocol families I'd say network driver level would be PF_LINK link layer interface? Is there another man page I should be looking at as well? FWIW my gmake output is this: gcc -Wall -Wformat-security -Wno-format-zero-length -g -O3 -I. -I/usr/include -I/usr/local/include -DLIBDIR='"/lib/l2tpns"' -DETCDIR='"/etc/l2tpns"' -DSTATISTICS -DSTAT_CALLS -DRINGBUFFER -DHAVE_EPOLL -DBGP -c -o arp.o arp.c arp.c: In function 'sendarp': arp.c:34: error: storage size of 'sll' isn't known arp.c:59: error: 'PF_PACKET' undeclared (first use in this function) arp.c:59: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once arp.c:59: error: for each function it appears in.) arp.c:62: error: 'AF_PACKET' undeclared (first use in this function) arp.c:34: warning: unused variable 'sll' gmake: *** [arp.o] Error 1 Cheers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 30 16:49:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5EC1065695 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:49:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carl@chave.us) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C868FC15 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:49:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so5090242fxm.13 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 08:49:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.79.74 with SMTP id o10mr4986793fak.63.1296406140220; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 08:49:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.79.2 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 08:49:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:49:00 -0500 Message-ID: From: Carl Chave To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Bridge Interface Members X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:49:01 -0000 Trying to configure a bridge interface with two member interfaces, fxp0 and re0. Configuring the interface from scratch manually works fine but when I add config entries to rc.conf the two member interfaces aren't added at boot. Bridge0 is created it just doesn't have any members. From the serial console I can manually add the two member interfaces and everything is fine but obviously I'd like it to work without manual intervention. Any ideas? Here's my rc.conf entries: cloned_interfaces="bridge0" ifconfig_bridge0="addm fxp0 addm re0" ifconfig_fxp0="up" ifconfig_re0="up" ifconfig_bridge0="inet 10.0.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 up" Any ideas? Troubleshooting is bit of a pain as I'm booting zfs root from a USB stick and there's a 5 minute (yes, 5 minutes!) delay at the BTX loader before the boot loader menu is displayed. I haven't figured out what's causing that but it makes tweaking and rebooting a slow process! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 30 23:20:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8876106564A for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 23:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joji@eskimo.com) Received: from ultra7.eskimo.com (ultra7.eskimo.com [204.122.16.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6638FC1C for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 23:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shell.eskimo.com (root@shell.eskimo.com [204.122.16.72]) by ultra7.eskimo.com (8.14.0/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p0UNK9JA006391; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:20:09 -0800 Received: from shell.eskimo.com (joji@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shell.eskimo.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p0UNKBDp030196; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:20:12 -0800 Received: (from joji@localhost) by shell.eskimo.com (8.14.3/8.12.10/Submit) id p0UNKBWE030195; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:20:11 -0800 Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:20:11 -0800 From: Joseph Olatt To: Frank Shute Message-ID: <20110130232011.GA30143@shell.eskimo.com> References: <20110129050836.GA26596@shell.eskimo.com> <20110130010123.GA93025@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110130010123.GA93025@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Joseph Olatt , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/ports/x11-wm/awesome problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 23:20:14 -0000 On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 01:01:23AM +0000, Frank Shute wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 09:08:36PM -0800, Joseph Olatt wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Anybody on the list having recent problems with the awesome window > > manager? I get the following error when I try to run awesome: > > > > W: awesome: image_new_from_file:288: cannot load image /usr/local/share/awesome/icons/awesome16.png: unknown error, that's really bad > > /usr/local/share/awesome/lib/awful/menu.lua:221: attempt to compare number with nil > > W: awesome: image_new_from_file:288: cannot load image /usr/local/share/awesome/icons/awesome16.png: unknown error, that's really bad > > /usr/local/share/awesome/lib/awful/menu.lua:221: attempt to compare number with nil > > > > > > > > /usr/local/share/awesome/icons/awesome16.png exists, is readable and can > > be displayed fine with display(1). > > > > > > I did csup the ports tree and recompiled both awesome and imlib2, but > > did not succeed. > > > > > > The entire output of startx is: > > > > X.Org X Server 1.7.5 > > Release Date: 2010-02-16 > > X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 > > Build Operating System: FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE i386 > > Current Operating System: FreeBSD mint 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE #0: Fri Jan 21 05:05:00 CST 2011 root@mint:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MINT i386 > > Build Date: 27 January 2011 07:56:40PM > > > > Current version of pixman: 0.18.4 > > Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org > > to make sure that you have the latest version. > > Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, > > (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, > > (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. > > (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Fri Jan 28 21:43:23 2011 > > (==) Using default built-in configuration (30 lines) > > (EE) Failed to load module "fbdev" (module does not exist, 0) > > NTSC > > XRANDR name: VGA-0 > > Connector: VGA > > CRT1: INTERNAL_DAC1 > > DDC reg: 0x60 > > XRANDR name: DVI-0 > > Connector: DVI-D > > DFP1: INTERNAL_TMDS1 > > DDC reg: 0x64 > > XRANDR name: LVDS > > Connector: LVDS > > LCD1: INTERNAL_LVDS > > DDC reg: 0x6c > > XRANDR name: S-video > > Connector: S-video > > TV1: INTERNAL_DAC2 > > DDC reg: 0x0 > > finished output detect: 0 > > finished output detect: 1 > > finished output detect: 2 > > finished output detect: 3 > > finished all detect > > Entering TV Save > > Save TV timing tables > > saveTimingTables: reading timing tables > > TV Save done > > disable primary dac > > disable FP1 > > disable TV > > init memmap > > init common > > init crtc1 > > init pll1 > > restore memmap > > restore common > > restore crtc1 > > restore pll1 > > set RMX > > set LVDS > > enable LVDS > > disable primary dac > > disable FP1 > > disable TV > > record: RECORD extension enabled at configure time. > > record: This extension is known to be broken, disabling extension now.. > > record: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20500 > > W: awesome: image_new_from_file:288: cannot load image /usr/local/share/awesome/icons/awesome16.png: unknown error, that's really bad > > /usr/local/share/awesome/lib/awful/menu.lua:221: attempt to compare number with nil > > W: awesome: image_new_from_file:288: cannot load image /usr/local/share/awesome/icons/awesome16.png: unknown error, that's really bad > > /usr/local/share/awesome/lib/awful/menu.lua:221: attempt to compare number with nil > > E: awesome: main:505: couldn't find any rc file > > Missing rc file. Copy and edit the example one distributed in the > package/port to your $HOME. > > Hopefully, that will get rid of most of the warnings. Frank, Thanks for your response. I did try copying over the required rc file soon after I sent out my first email. All it did was stop complaining about it. But, the other errors persisted. I suspect that there is a problem with the imlib2 routines. I may have to write some code using the imlib2 routines before I can confirm this. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 06:00:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7221065679 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:00:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0F18FC0A for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:00:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0V60EKK014744 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:00:14 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p0V60EKK014744 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1296453614; bh=QUUy3/aLj0aPavclgBimkZMUYIRAqWfrlTSOtTkqUZE=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4D464FE6.7060200@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20M on,=2031=20Jan=202011=2006:00:06=20+0000|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20en-US=3B=20r v:1.9.2.13)=20Gecko/20101207=20Thunderbird/3.1.7|MIME-Version:=201 .0|To:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Bridge=20I nterface=20Members|References:=20|In-Reply-To:=20|X-Enigmail-Version:= 201.1.1|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed= 3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-sign ature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enig3845EC5006BDDE61F8D6 D077"; b=sOe4X26RjkyvASxFNH51DCJKz4llAuVvNuvrTuSOPur6hh2iz0yYan8JX/FSxArqU Va88idGjV6M+vLNyEOTDD8pr2yoQAjyKyrvYkerMCPz440opiSlOZP6LoMpA2nEkNA 1efptEd75AMjcelVwg612moHEggGGUQIzvqtqdKM= Message-ID: <4D464FE6.7060200@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:00:06 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3845EC5006BDDE61F8D6D077" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: Bridge Interface Members X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:00:20 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3845EC5006BDDE61F8D6D077 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 30/01/2011 16:49, Carl Chave wrote: > Trying to configure a bridge interface with two member interfaces, > fxp0 and re0. Configuring the interface from scratch manually works > fine but when I add config entries to rc.conf the two member > interfaces aren't added at boot. Bridge0 is created it just doesn't > have any members. From the serial console I can manually add the two > member interfaces and everything is fine but obviously I'd like it to > work without manual intervention. Any ideas? >=20 > Here's my rc.conf entries: >=20 > cloned_interfaces=3D"bridge0" > ifconfig_bridge0=3D"addm fxp0 addm re0" > ifconfig_fxp0=3D"up" > ifconfig_re0=3D"up" > ifconfig_bridge0=3D"inet 10.0.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 up" >=20 > Any ideas? Yes. You overwrite your first ifconfig_bridge0 setting with the second one. These are shell variable initializations, not executable statements= =2E There are various ways to fix the problem. Try this for example: replace the second ifconfig_bridge0 line with: ipv4_addrs_bridge0=3D"10.0.1.2/24" Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig3845EC5006BDDE61F8D6D077 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1GT+4ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxYjACdFL4+k9Vy9YrdCAYIXGMWxNhy tGcAn3kEXtcqgCE9ZUjbKAuSrdC4OgdE =m7UQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3845EC5006BDDE61F8D6D077-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 10:22:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5DB106564A for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:22:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38358FC21 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:22:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj21 with SMTP id 21so2058467gwj.13 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 02:22:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=1d8+vzHQMBZMNTqY9Y8zj82Q02ZEVXbcUkzd2inbUZo=; b=Bz1SlaH3wKOycE2+wQrM2rzapOvLEBGG39s0LVW4XpLbJklV+nUayFQ/lat5AW5c/q 0hXIj/4MeBOVT8rbOZwF70a4B15MjFw4wr3dKa10hRlmu4y8rGD6/kkHw7Dwmn/wvoV9 Lmg0CHdctmxA7FiW+GhHV4E6kPgcKGzWWJw+E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; b=k25jVpbGsLV9qTTIBk/PzVJ3hdgp/DTBH+cLorH4LsSUeWRvdeHs3RgFHXMssEVlaa UTxfBblIeIbhYJgJhQfFjuK+bcD1qUY/YE69s8STzRP/GF0N4KDSriDt6ZhsPbSsc2Cx DYxnbpaI7sCNCvp5D8N9WzzAK+vmfsDfJ65pk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.108.167 with SMTP id q27mr12068878yhg.36.1296469350222; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 02:22:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.105.197 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 02:22:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 05:22:30 -0500 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: Da Rock Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: linux PF_PACKET compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:22:32 -0000 Da Rock wrote: ... > I've been chasing the answer to a FreeBSD version of this (approx. > anyway), but I needed to find out what exactly PF_PACKET was first. > Finally found this answer here: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/4659 > > I looked up man socket and I can see possibilities (in my mind anyway), > but I thought I'd be best to check if the gurus here might have a better > idea. My reason for this is I'm attempting to build l2tpns (which > supposedly builds on 7.2?! with no trouble), and I'm chasing the errors > which appear to be linuxisms mostly. > > So in man socket simply looking at the list of protocol families I'd say > network driver level would be PF_LINK link layer interface? Is there > another man page I should be looking at as well? In the past, those wishing to use similar functionality on FreeBSD have turned to pcap(3), bpf(4), or ng_etf(4), and the underlying code. This kind of question is better directed to the freebsd-hackers and freebsd-net lists. b. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 10:31:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411F51065673 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:31:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [91.121.44.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0977B8FC1E for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr129041.univ-rennes1.fr (mr129041.cri.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.129.41]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A21866332BE; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:30:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from mr129041.univ-rennes1.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mr129041.univ-rennes1.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A46B872; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:30:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:30:58 +0100 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110131113058.71d4e4e8@mr129041.univ-rennes1.fr> In-Reply-To: <4D437DD6.4030202@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4D437DD6.4030202@herveybayaustralia.com.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Da Rock Subject: Re: PF firewall rules and documentation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:31:00 -0000 Le Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:39:18 +1000, Da Rock a écrit : > I spent some time playing with pf and pf.conf, and followed the > directions in the handbook. It redirected me to the openbsd site for > pf.conf, and recommended it as the most comprehensive documentation > for pf. > > Firstly, I didn't find that. I had to translate the instructions into > the current version used in FreeBSD, OpenBSD appears to be further > advanced than this based on the current docs. Yes, you should refer to the OpenBSD 4.1 Packet FAQ : http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/doc/history/pf-faq41.pdf > Secondly, some of the rules don't appear to be following. From my > understanding based on the documentation in the handbook and on the > site pf is default allowing traffic. According to a current discussion on misc@openbsd.org. It allows traffic to pass but without creating states. > So explicit rules to block > should be set first and then rules set to allow what is needed in. > Some assumptions are made in the rules by the interpreter, so > according to OpenBSD one can (even in the older versions) simply > state block and it is interpreted as 'block on $interfaces all'. This > turned out to not be the case. Ah? Do have an example for this? > I know this has come up before, but I think it might be time to > document pf.conf properly. It seems to be a bit of security risk not > to. Users may be mistaken in their belief of their security on the > network using pf, and may be less likely to trust again when it > breaks. This is true, many things are now more precise in the manual page of OpenBSD's PF. But it will be hard to merge only these precisions in our pf.conf manual page. There are some plans to update PF to a more recent version. So may be it will be better. Regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 10:51:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5EF1065674 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:51:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643888FC18 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.186]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652695C44 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:58:11 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D46934B.7060505@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:47:39 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101227 Thunderbird/3.0.11 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: linux PF_PACKET compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:51:06 -0000 On 01/31/11 20:22, b. f. wrote: > Da Rock wrote: > ... > >> I've been chasing the answer to a FreeBSD version of this (approx. >> anyway), but I needed to find out what exactly PF_PACKET was first. >> Finally found this answer here: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/4659 >> >> I looked up man socket and I can see possibilities (in my mind anyway), >> but I thought I'd be best to check if the gurus here might have a better >> idea. My reason for this is I'm attempting to build l2tpns (which >> supposedly builds on 7.2?! with no trouble), and I'm chasing the errors >> which appear to be linuxisms mostly. >> >> So in man socket simply looking at the list of protocol families I'd say >> network driver level would be PF_LINK link layer interface? Is there >> another man page I should be looking at as well? >> > In the past, those wishing to use similar functionality on FreeBSD > have turned to pcap(3), bpf(4), or ng_etf(4), and the underlying code. > This kind of question is better directed to the freebsd-hackers and > freebsd-net lists. > > I figured it might be. Having trouble with hackers atm though- can't subscribe... :( Thx From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 11:01:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B561065675 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:01:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB288FC14 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:01:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.186]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 995845C44 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:08:56 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D4695D0.1040604@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:58:24 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101227 Thunderbird/3.0.11 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4D437DD6.4030202@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20110131113058.71d4e4e8@mr129041.univ-rennes1.fr> In-Reply-To: <20110131113058.71d4e4e8@mr129041.univ-rennes1.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: PF firewall rules and documentation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:01:51 -0000 On 01/31/11 20:30, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > Le Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:39:18 +1000, > Da Rock a écrit : > > >> I spent some time playing with pf and pf.conf, and followed the >> directions in the handbook. It redirected me to the openbsd site for >> pf.conf, and recommended it as the most comprehensive documentation >> for pf. >> >> Firstly, I didn't find that. I had to translate the instructions into >> the current version used in FreeBSD, OpenBSD appears to be further >> advanced than this based on the current docs. >> > Yes, you should refer to the OpenBSD 4.1 Packet FAQ : > http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/doc/history/pf-faq41.pdf > > >> Secondly, some of the rules don't appear to be following. From my >> understanding based on the documentation in the handbook and on the >> site pf is default allowing traffic. >> > According to a current discussion on misc@openbsd.org. It allows > traffic to pass but without creating states. > Exactly. 'permitting' is the term in the handbook I believe. > >> So explicit rules to block >> should be set first and then rules set to allow what is needed in. >> Some assumptions are made in the rules by the interpreter, so >> according to OpenBSD one can (even in the older versions) simply >> state block and it is interpreted as 'block on $interfaces all'. This >> turned out to not be the case. >> > Ah? Do have an example for this? > Yes. Me unfortunately, but I did manage to pick it up quite quickly though. I had a little thief attack one of my ports and attempt login on the firewall. I had to change it to 'block in $log on $ext_if all block out $log on $ext_if all' to actually block the traffic. Bit of a doozy really, I'm still monitoring the traffic very closely with tcpdump on the interface and not the log. Thankfully I was also getting ready to update and completely rebuild most (scratch that- all) of my systems to newer and more manageable levels. > > >> I know this has come up before, but I think it might be time to >> document pf.conf properly. It seems to be a bit of security risk not >> to. Users may be mistaken in their belief of their security on the >> network using pf, and may be less likely to trust again when it >> breaks. >> > This is true, many things are now more precise in the manual page of > OpenBSD's PF. But it will be hard to merge only these precisions in our > pf.conf manual page. > > There are some plans to update PF to a more recent version. So may > be it will be better. > Actually, that sounds like a better idea than mine ;) Kills 2 birds with one stone then... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 11:42:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCDD1065670 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:42:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carl@chave.us) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E286D8FC0C for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:42:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so5720360fxm.13 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 03:42:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.53.68 with SMTP id l4mr5927993fag.44.1296474146476; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 03:42:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.79.2 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 03:42:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D464FE6.7060200@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <4D464FE6.7060200@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:42:26 -0500 Message-ID: From: Carl Chave To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Bridge Interface Members X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:42:28 -0000 > Yes. =A0You overwrite your first ifconfig_bridge0 setting with the second > one. =A0These are shell variable initializations, not executable statemen= ts. > > There are various ways to fix the problem. =A0Try this for example: > replace the second ifconfig_bridge0 line with: > > ipv4_addrs_bridge0=3D"10.0.1.2/24" > Doh! Of course, thanks. Rookie mistake. Carl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 09:32:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002E71065674 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:32:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E2B8FC1A for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pjq7D-00027g-FJ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:32:07 +0100 Received: from office.cellnetrix.com ([80.243.14.38]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:32:07 +0100 Received: from konstantin.vasiliev by office.cellnetrix.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:32:07 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Konstantin Vasilyev Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:30:25 +0300 Lines: 52 Message-ID: References: <20110127075618.GA53094@jackstaff.jumbobrian.com> <20110127093155.GA54987@jackstaff.jumbobrian.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: office.cellnetrix.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 In-Reply-To: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:27:55 +0000 Subject: Re: Problem with freebsd-update on 7.3-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: konstantin.vasiliev@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:32:10 -0000 27.01.2011 15:19, Konstantin Vasilyev ÐÉÛÅÔ: > Ok. > Things a not good :-( > freebsd-update produce a lot of output like this >> /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c has SHA256 hash 893beadfcf15784f31553ea142867c2949422d6937cb61f11a0f42ae3d7727fc, but should have SHA256 hash ce374f0d9434d08ee35769f8cbad7ca074506b814394b30d19d2aebcf3b2a29c. >> /usr/src/sys/nfsclient/nfs_vfsops.c has SHA256 hash 7a69b307a5df13994c8c229946e3f20cdb22268ca967f596c70477c82250c7d2, but should have SHA256 hash 397e464eea58b339597b4a3ee6117ad9b58827814462131153070c2a067e357d. >> /usr/src/sys/nfsclient/nfs_vfsops.c has SHA256 hash 7a69b307a5df13994c8c229946e3f20cdb22268ca967f596c70477c82250c7d2, but should have SHA256 hash c54c0c265e22fdb7a323680ccbc25859fc171ebec485a68a06eae774683321ab. >> /usr/src/usr.bin/lex/mkskel.sh has 0755 permissions, but should have 0744 permissions. >> /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/tkpkg has 0755 permissions, but should have 0754 permissions. > My system is out of sync now. > Question is How can I sync my system? > > -- > With best regards, > Konstantin Vasilyev > > > 27.01.2011 12:31, Brian DeFreitas ÐÉÛÅÔ: >> Konstantin Vasilyev wrote: >>> I know about how freedsd-update work. >>> I use for a long time. >>> But I don't understand why is freebsd-update going to update >>>> FreeBSD ota2.cellnetrix.com 7.3-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE-p4 >>> to >>>> The following files will be updated as part of updating to 7.3-RELEASE-p4:... >> >> Ah, I see the problem now. >> >> The only thing I can think of is that your kernel and world might be out >> of sync, but if you're used to freebsd-update that seems unlikely. >> >> What's the output of 'freebsd-update IDS' ? I've had luck running that >> to see what freebsd-update thinks is going on with the system. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I'm trying to refresh post. Please give me an idea how to make my system updatable via freebsd-update. -- With best regards, Konstantin Vasilyev From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 14:40:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433F8106564A for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:40:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.wilcox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0026D8FC14 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so2129495gyf.13 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:40:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mVzBocvq4JjCJ0/Oi7B1LmhcoSbj+NXFuRiQvHEhrSs=; b=sgb97Rrcb+JCd/BdoUBZos4ax5VjR0/RD3Ko9mEMy7UmxMvh/ak6C5SLHJj5wpC34b 4BlFTvno+36POzSgyO1PP7OvkubOh1kZnwMB0Kt8r+6Yg6XsAz3ooyZ6xB++IRUCd9N6 QjDeV3fmQvhNDHgtJ3fdynt41mWWfNdu7DaCE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=xUHkpqgKlS1rW84XahIflwvn11Ifp3Zc7e97khEyIdN399CgiQNMIjlxbe/v7Dhcjs SMGJbz2tjl0vf/S6sFYJgU2UugDmxHTC/YCQR9l0TXQAWyP6qWiPnMtQldSCVnqD0mMg q1rSE1yk8qG858tUJOADl4MaUSYscGD1iTLZc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.248.28 with SMTP id v28mr8891162agh.168.1296484855102; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:40:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.79.10 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:40:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D4695D0.1040604@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4D437DD6.4030202@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20110131113058.71d4e4e8@mr129041.univ-rennes1.fr> <4D4695D0.1040604@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:40:54 -0500 Message-ID: From: Kevin Wilcox To: Da Rock Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PF firewall rules and documentation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:40:56 -0000 On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 05:58, Da Rock wrote: > Yes. Me unfortunately, but I did manage to pick it up quite quickly though. > I had a little thief attack one of my ports and attempt login on the > firewall. I had to change it to 'block in $log on $ext_if all > block out $log on $ext_if all' to actually block the traffic. Bit of a doozy > really, I'm still monitoring the traffic very closely with tcpdump on the > interface and not the log. Unless you have an explicit need to block in/out, it's easier to maintain a ruleset that uses block log on $ext_if For example, I use the following as a "starting point" for some of my routing firewalls: ============================= int_if=bge1 ext_if=bge0 set skip on lo # block everything block # NAT rule pass out log(all) on $ext_if from ($int_if:network) to any nat-to ($ext_if) # allow traffic in on the internal interface pass in on $int_if from ($int_if:network) to any keep state ============================= There are at least three things in that basic config that some people would jump on me for. 1) why block all if I'm then allowing every in on the internal interface? 2) why block all if I'm allowing everything out on the external interface? 3) why not pass everything on the internal interface and then filter on the external? The shortest answer is because I happen to like that starting point and it serves as a syntactical reminder if I deploy without a pf reference handy. Regarding 1) and 2), the longer answer is that I like to control traffic flow. I don't want to allow inbound connections on the external interface and I don't have a need for the firewall to connect to machines inside the NAT. On my bridges I'll set skip on the internal interface and filter on the other but I don't like doing that for a router. >> There are some plans to update PF to a more recent version. So may >> be it will be better. >> > > Actually, that sounds like a better idea than mine ;) Kills 2 birds with one > stone then... I am truly excited about this as the NAT and RDR stuff was significantly cleaned up (and the OpenBSD pf FAQ is a great resource). I'm even more excited about the patch to tcpdump that Daniel just sent to freebsd-pf@ that allows you to tcpdump a pfsync device and pull the state creation/updates - in my opinion, that's the weakest area for a BSD firewall (we'll ignore span ports on routers since you can bridge two addressed interfaces and create a span of that bridge) and being able to easily pull those NAT translations fulfills some serious accountability issues. If you need a reliable printed reference, you should really consider picking up Hansteen's _The Book of PF_, available from No Starch Press: http://nostarch.com/pf2.htm I have the first edition and it's incredible but somewhat dated. The author suggests the second edition for FreeBSD 8.x+. kmw From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 16:03:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883FA106566B for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:03:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=00126c72a7=kalts@estcard.ee) Received: from smtp.estcard.ee (smtp.estcard.ee [194.204.11.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D06C8FC16 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:03:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fserv.internal ([192.168.10.3]) by smtp.estcard.ee with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.73) (envelope-from ) id 1Pjvyy-0004CW-4Q for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:48:00 +0200 Received: from myhakas.internal ([192.168.21.128]) by fserv.internal with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pjvyy-00050c-2d for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:48:00 +0200 Received: from kalts by myhakas.internal with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pjvyx-0004dL-Vg for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:48:00 +0200 Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:47:59 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110131154759.GA17485@hape.internal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: FreeBSD 8.2: state of Kerberos, GSS-API and (Cyrus) SASL? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalts@estpak.ee List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:03:45 -0000 Hi I have the pleasure to post again to the FreeBSD list. Once a young die-hard FreeBSD user I was pressured to "make do" with Linux for reasons which I could not challenge. Part of those reasons have been lifted so I'm considering FreeBSD again. Googling for the subject keywords gave me quite disturbing overall feeling. I have no personal experience but it seems that things are broken from the second half of 2010 and still not recovered? I got KDC up and working on 8.2-RC2 base Heimdal without any glitch, but this is to be expected. What's the state about GSS-API and cyrus-sasl2 integration with base Heimdal? With ports Heimdal? Can I replace base Heimdal with one from ports, is it supported? Any make.conf knobs to fiddle with? Any info appreciated. thanks, -- Vallo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 16:43:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB8C106564A for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:43:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-hamburg.de (mailhost.uni-hamburg.de [134.100.32.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7678FC19 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:43:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.uni-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3702490083; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:43:19 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by University of Hamburg (RRZ/mailhost) Received: from mailhost.uni-hamburg.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailhost.uni-hamburg.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id kzeJ-EFAWBwj; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:43:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from pc911.math.uni-hamburg.de (pc911.math.uni-hamburg.de [134.100.220.198]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: fmjv004) by mailhost.uni-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 179A390023; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:43:19 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4D46E6A8.8040408@janh.de> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:43:20 +0100 From: Jan Henrik Sylvester User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101219 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vallo Kallaste References: <20110131154759.GA17485@hape.internal> In-Reply-To: <20110131154759.GA17485@hape.internal> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions-list freebsd Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.2: state of Kerberos, GSS-API and (Cyrus) SASL? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:43:21 -0000 On 01/-10/-28163 20:59, Vallo Kallaste wrote: > Googling for the subject keywords gave me quite disturbing overall > feeling. I have no personal experience but it seems that things are > broken from the second half of 2010 and still not recovered? I got GSSAPI of Heimdal 1.1 in FreeBSD base is still broken, GSSAPI of Heimdal 1.4 in ports is supposed to work, but I have not been successful with Cyrus SASL (see below). > KDC up and working on 8.2-RC2 base Heimdal without any glitch, but > this is to be expected. What's the state about GSS-API and > cyrus-sasl2 integration with base Heimdal? With ports Heimdal? Can I > replace base Heimdal with one from ports, is it supported? Any > make.conf knobs to fiddle with? Any info appreciated. I am struggling with exactly the same problem. Unfortunately, I got no reply on this list about it: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2011-January/226495.html If you get any further, please, tell me. I am thinking about reposting my question to a different list: stable as that is where the earlier discussions happened or ports as that seems more appropriate. What I have not tried, yet, is using MIT Kerberos from ports instead of Heimdal, but since we use Heimdal here for everything, I am kind of reluctant. (Otherwise, I would have to setup some Linux server...) Cheers, Jan Henrik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 17:37:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48671065670 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:37:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlmichael70@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654778FC18 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:37:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so5969821wyf.13 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:37:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NnFecxBZXAkIkLvGCgRWa67O7hIb4byTY0p3N2crpq8=; b=GozNpQLrnu/d7HLdmvqSa/yEXrwHaSxliBiyRSDKh3+96/TbSCxMGVxT5Yj+ggOKod sFq3oYepH2WnQqMCoTyaAcDqtMjF1+8h7SLq+39opGPS2OgEYmtYCrt4FzvA96ItPQB3 ZL+wpi6xSu9l4pCVgXuHmo9CJx3wDb5QsKmbE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Eh1Xmp4Jqr/HSzPbQBA28nhxh5DmJ/kShobaD+L8jjVfk/QO4Q/5OhqqgfD5+TTp3l DvZihc8dZPVfb12FP7aT1+HycDa4M7TqfRPj06M9peEwaFjUYMLbdHgJMPt9C1Y70FiV MtW1q30emqJW1UE99rEn/eN2k7r8gX3TLPPb8= Received: by 10.227.157.1 with SMTP id z1mr6540474wbw.23.1296495453064; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:37:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from prime.nonspace ([82.132.211.22]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f35sm15333760wbf.20.2011.01.31.09.37.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:37:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D46F363.8020708@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:37:39 +0000 From: Michael User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101215 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CyberLeo Kitsana References: <4D42DF1B.7080604@gmail.com> <4D4417E5.1040807@cyberleo.net> In-Reply-To: <4D4417E5.1040807@cyberleo.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: syslog and chrooted isc-dhcpd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:37:34 -0000 On 29/01/2011 13:36, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote: > On 01/28/2011 09:22 AM, Michael wrote: >> I'm running my isc-dhcp41-server with chroot option. >> Is it possible to get it working with syslog? I don't know how to let >> chrooted dhcpd to talk with my syslog. > > Apparently, you can either provide the -l flag via rc.conf > (syslogd_flags) or add the full log socket path to > /var/run/syslogd.sockets on the host. > Thanks a lot! Now I'm getting logs with syslogd_flags. Just to confirm - is it normal that they don't come with local7 facility (as set up in dhcpd.conf) but I need to do !dhcpd *.* /var/log/dhcpd.log in my syslogd configuration file? Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 17:48:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D275106564A for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:48:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441F78FC08 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:48:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so5563945qyk.13 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:48:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OBB8VV6Cajz8Xj51kvqWiKAaIsm6kTd6IV37+rUhj2I=; b=L9WMJW5qktXa9WT/RpR35XMC1w+wTSj3LYGkYc9/CtrtZX7nHvxSo+6pgrG2rmkvg7 NtsmBlpnwIZ2Ng5Pdzod6kfGKaoIrlGXVQ3ZxfzjAMDKl4mNtc29Mgu49d0QU3PqlioN maKZbvWebD+DToVxwjC2bmnKQtZmzdFgXI7f8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=FlVbemaFIncv04t6+E1nhf1NE1HBn+UA4cXC4Qn7Fbd9dW2sX0LVRqp2cgjRpEejSN g8S1jkJAxXOAQZ2F9pWGLI9U9Py6BHjUq1+Ro31gfXgP/Kc2Q/QV/cALl6hcfq+Jxu3h mKZLfRqOC423Za/VGzziONDIci4V4Riz8qDbc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.89.74 with SMTP id d10mr6465124qam.335.1296494484629; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:21:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.175.141 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:21:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:21:23 +0100 Message-ID: From: Paul B Mahol To: Eitan Adler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: computer panics when wifi settings are touched. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:48:51 -0000 On 1/25/11, Eitan Adler wrote: > Recently I tried to connect to the same AP described in the following > thread: > http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-questions@freebsd.org/msg238799.html > > It worked relatively well until now. > > Whenever I try to use ifconfig, wpa_supplicant, dhclient, or any > related tool on the wlan0 interface it results in a system freeze. The > only way to get out of this is to hard reset the computer - but I do > not see the typical backtrace associated with a panic (even when X is > not running). > > What debugging information is needed to help solve the problem? FreeBSD version. Steps to reproduce the problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 18:55:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482051065675 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:55:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gull@gull.us) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBD08FC14 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyf6 with SMTP id 6so2838307eyf.13 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:55:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.11.147 with SMTP id 19mr7311643eex.14.1296500132490; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:55:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.119.1 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:55:32 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [128.95.17.251] In-Reply-To: <84r5bz13ai.fsf@maxwell.cjones.org> References: <84r5bz13ai.fsf@maxwell.cjones.org> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:55:32 -0800 Message-ID: From: David Brodbeck To: weif@weif.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Issue upgrading to 7.4, looking for guidance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:55:34 -0000 I ran into a similar issue upgrading from 7.2 to 7.3. Here's the thread where I worked it out; it might be helpful in your case: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2010-July/218443.html My eventual solution was here, if you don't want to read through the whole thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2010-July/218884.html On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Keith Seyffarth wrote: > > I recently was having problems with Firefox crashing, which appear to be > related to a requirement for semaphore support for Firefox after the > upgrade to the new version of GTK. > > Anyway, this left me with a 7.4 kernel and a 7.2 world. Which I > understand is supposed to work. > > > However, this broke CUPS for printing, and I need to be able to print to > pdf. This error is generated if I try to build cups, or when cups tries > to load on startup: > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: ./mantohtml: invalid PT_PHDR > > > >From looking around on-line, it looks like somewhere between 7.2 and 7.4 > there was an incompatibility that causes this error in a number of places > (printing, samba, etc.) > > > So, it looks like I need to upgrade the rest of the way. But I can't get > the upgrade to work. I thought this was where to start: > > # freebsd-update -r 7.4-RELEASE upgrade > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. > Fetching public key from update5.FreeBSD.org... failed. > Fetching public key from update4.FreeBSD.org... failed. > Fetching public key from update2.FreeBSD.org... failed. > Fetching public key from update3.FreeBSD.org... failed. > No mirrors remaining, giving up. > > So I ran uname -a to find that this is 7.4-PRERELEASE > > FreeBSD janet.weif.net 7.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.4-PRERELEASE #0: Thu Jan > 20 19:39:15 MST 2011 =A0 =A0 weif@janet.weif.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/JAN= ET > i386 > > > so I tried this: > > # freebsd-update -r 7.4-PRERELEASE upgrade > freebsd-update: Cannot upgrade from 7.4-PRERELEASE to itself > > > so, um, what do I need to do to address this error: > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: ./mantohtml: invalid PT_PHDR > > > Keith S. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 19:25:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295A2106566B for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:25:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weif@weif.net) Received: from maxwell.cjones.org (mail.cjones.org [69.146.226.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010B68FC08 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:25:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by maxwell.cjones.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 6DA3D4A64C7; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:25:37 -0700 (MST) From: Keith Seyffarth To: David Brodbeck In-Reply-To: (message from David Brodbeck on Mon, 31 Jan 2011 10:55:32 -0800) References: <84r5bz13ai.fsf@maxwell.cjones.org> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:25:37 -0700 Message-ID: <84hbcolvta.fsf@maxwell.cjones.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Issue upgrading to 7.4, looking for guidance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: weif@weif.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:25:39 -0000 David, > I ran into a similar issue upgrading from 7.2 to 7.3. Here's the > thread where I worked it out; it might be helpful in your case: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2010-July/218443.html > My eventual solution was here, if you don't want to read through the > whole thread: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2010-July/218884.html I ended up getting instructions from a friend n manually running # make buildworld # mergemaster -p # make installworld # mergemaster -i to get the world upgraded to 7.4-PRERELEASE. After this a bunch of removing, reinstalling, and upgrading of ports was necessary, but everything appears to be working now. Of course, not having a FreeBSD CD for any version of FreeBSD would make copying a file from the CD rather difficult... ;) Keith S. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 19:28:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2FE106566B for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:28:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noah-list@enabled.com) Received: from enabled.com (www-virt.enabled.com [174.143.253.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE038FC13 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:28:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcpx-199-125.corp.yahoo.com (nat-dip6.cfw-a-gci.corp.yahoo.com [209.131.62.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by enabled.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8331D58D13 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:12:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D470991.4050003@enabled.com> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:12:17 -0800 From: Noah User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: open source scheduling system for shift workers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:28:20 -0000 Hi there, Is there a good open source scheduling system that somebody can recommendation? Basically I need to track people who perform duties on 4 to 8 hour shifts. I am sure there is something written out there. I have found limitations with phpscheduleit for creating 4 hour slices multiple times a day. Maybe recent improvements to the code has fixed this. But are there other options out there. Cheers, Noah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 20:36:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CDB106566C for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:36:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi.sergio@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898DA8FC1D for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:36:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxa40 with SMTP id 40so399262vxa.13 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:36:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references :content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=jTZB8fZnVFwz4LxchMC7c3HleEe04ueGVy7uj/vCk7I=; b=veAtNj+E6e/x19nduFethmoXnNx73/auklf++9gXlqAw7QVJ/C+xYFLOUQi8651vP2 yKwMEVj8jvwf8zSZ6GescL92dT/M0TZFAnSDxrltLENx73u/DNA9DArin22RfKYC30cV mlhu8VSDN/pU0v2+z7anqExqSebz6eHeARCzo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=Rpa185JA7Ng1NWl2wRd9tmcgA/0r/onEBoSQuW3giMWZOP0H0zlx7eaW+/2tr7krpx iRqWg4VZSAXWZ6b2RMEG+t0JSRMJSI7UhDmhS6Ca8vQOs5I0KXOoXfiJztYByaAsebuC QsBXGV3MZOfKwLxoWAkX8xjq//8teTJZABT7g= Received: by 10.220.176.11 with SMTP id bc11mr1669447vcb.149.1296506217544; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:36:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.6.230] ([201.21.166.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y15sm7201229vch.29.2011.01.31.12.36.54 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:36:56 -0800 (PST) From: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi To: David Brodbeck In-Reply-To: References: <84r5bz13ai.fsf@maxwell.cjones.org> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:36:52 -0200 Message-ID: <1296506212.5414.12.camel@z6000.lenzinote> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: weif@weif.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Issue upgrading to 7.4, looking for guidance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:36:59 -0000 For me I used a "quick and dirty" solution for upgrade 1) build a machine (or a virtual one...) with the freebsd version you want, for example=8.2 cvsup the kernel in /usr/src 2) export KERNCONF=xxxxxx the name of the kernel config file you want to build 3) cd /usr/src;make buildworld buildkernel 4) mkdir /tmp/dist 5) export DESTDIR=/tmp/dist 6) make installworld installkernel 7) (cd /tmp/dist;tar cvzf - * ) > /tmp/newsystem.tar.gz 8) move the newsystem.tar.gz to the machine you want to upgrade 9) /rescue/tar -xpvf newsystem.tar.gz -C / the system will not respond to comands any more because of rewrite of almost all libs... so the solution is fastboot When the system comes up, it shows the release you built from this way you can go from 7.0 to 8.2 in one single step. for me it worked in internet all times but, you are warned: use at you own risk... Sergio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 31 20:41:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7324A1065670 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:41:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=00126c72a7=kalts@estcard.ee) Received: from smtp.estcard.ee (smtp.estcard.ee [194.204.11.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68268FC1A for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fserv.internal ([192.168.10.3]) by smtp.estcard.ee with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.73) (envelope-from ) id 1Pk0YW-0007hn-5n; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:41:02 +0200 Received: from myhakas.internal ([192.168.21.128]) by fserv.internal with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pk0YW-0003WD-3q; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:41:00 +0200 Received: from kalts by myhakas.internal with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pk0YV-0005LJ-Tl; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:40:59 +0200 Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:40:59 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste To: Jan Henrik Sylvester Message-ID: <20110131204059.GB17485@hape.internal> References: <20110131154759.GA17485@hape.internal> <4D46E6A8.8040408@janh.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D46E6A8.8040408@janh.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: questions-list freebsd Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.2: state of Kerberos, GSS-API and (Cyrus) SASL? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalts@estpak.ee List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:41:06 -0000 On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 05:43:20PM +0100, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > >cyrus-sasl2 integration with base Heimdal? With ports Heimdal? Can I > >replace base Heimdal with one from ports, is it supported? Any > >make.conf knobs to fiddle with? Any info appreciated. > > I am struggling with exactly the same problem. Unfortunately, I got > no reply on this list about it: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2011-January/226495.html > > If you get any further, please, tell me. I am thinking about > reposting my question to a different list: stable as that is where > the earlier discussions happened or ports as that seems more > appropriate. > > What I have not tried, yet, is using MIT Kerberos from ports instead > of Heimdal, but since we use Heimdal here for everything, I am kind > of reluctant. (Otherwise, I would have to setup some Linux > server...) > I looked around for knobs to disable building base Heimdal and other kerberised bits in hope that security/heimdal could be installed into /usr. Nothing in make.conf but I found new /etc/src.conf file, sure things have changed since 5.1 days when I left. Oh the horror days of 5.x, but I digress. Anyway, I think that by fiddling with src.conf knobs one can suppress building the base Heimdal and all other kerberised things. After one modified build and installworld the old bits lying around should be removed and Heimdal port installed into /usr by defining HEIMDAL_HOME. This is for start, clean base for further exploration. On the other hand I found the following patches in the security/heimdal commit log: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/152030 I will try that first, but this will be no-go in production because those patches aren't probably committed to -STABLE. -- Vallo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 00:37:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788F8106564A for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 00:37:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dirk.scheerlinck@telenet.be) Received: from winston.telenet-ops.be (winston.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408688FC0C for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 00:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from juliette.telenet-ops.be (unknown [195.130.137.74]) by winston.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114A81BC8D3 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 01:25:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from freebsds4.WORKGROUP ([213.119.0.47]) by juliette.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id 2QRu1g00510qkPp06QRuPc; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 01:25:54 +0100 Message-ID: <4D476124.4030006@telenet.be> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 01:25:56 +0000 From: ds User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100630) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: ntfs-3g X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:37:18 -0000 Hello, I have installed ntfs-3g on freebsd 8.1 and even after tuning the ntfs-3g environment variables the writing speed from the ufs2-freebsd disk to a windows xp disk is only about 10 MB/s while writing to ext2 or ufs2 disks from the same brand and type is between 40 and 50 MB/s, so at least 4 times as fast. With slackware 13.1 and ntfs-3g the writing speed to the same windows xp disk is about 40 MB/s Are there any patches or alternatives to fix this problem in freebsd 8.1 ? Kind regards, Dirk Scheerlinck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 02:41:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21EC106564A for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 02:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3648D8FC0C for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 02:40:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so6298457wwf.31 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:40:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=InQ4QOFMcveho5CN9ayO0VEyV64fKG3knkUi+bST/jg=; b=bm4TilO7Qy9Tv5rHV9CVX9giFGlSsuNv/H5suooaH8XA/MsMbfwf8/dkQTTEiIENaX PoaMJGSUskI7iHeH6BbCoqrJYWnwaCMaxZE7HqIlLxwIoiBlo/by26Ds8GW2LR/9CsLl d7tcqVDt7e4OAklB0kCrG9yM0hlZu44wslc8w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=YXkVvsNq8JjWkraPc+IRuzbSoXINysfUGLBYSW19sPetv/mbB2v8cbvi5OHrZ8Fngj 2FsYbdvz2qoQFdOFNnq1ATE+ABmd/6S8AXrZpTyRtJjoNlWOxtuvP+Ai6EPiC/y6n0Um Ak2gqAjzkHeCqmCIPIDiPm5EXomu8o3uMK7QY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.154.83 with SMTP id g61mr7267618wek.87.1296526340134; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:12:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.36.71 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:12:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:12:19 -0600 Message-ID: From: Brandon Gooch To: Axel Barnabas Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Ettercap segmentation fault.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 02:41:00 -0000 On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Axel Barnabas wrote: > Hello, > > I have compiles ettercap from ports without incident. However, when I att= empt to run ettercap in any way, after a short while the program crashes an= d I am presented with an error message which is as follows: > > > Ooops ! This shouldn't happen... > Segmentation Fault... > > Please recompile in debug mode, reproduce the bug and send a bugreport > > > I have deinstalled and recompiled to program twice, yielding no results. > Some additional information which may be useful- > > #pkg_info | grep ettercap > ettercap-gtk2-0.7.3_10,1 A network sniffer/interceptor/injector/logger fo= r switched > > #uname -a > FreeBSD =A08.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov 21 15:02:08 UTC 20= 09 =A0 =A0 root@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC =A0amd64 > > If anyone wishes me to recompile in debug mode, you will have to tell me = how; I am not familiar with the process. > > Axel Try this: Before building the port (if you're starting from scratch), run: Code: # cd /usr/ports/net-mgmt/ettercap # make fetch # make extract In the file "/usr/ports/net-mgmt/ettercap/work/ettercap-NG-0.7.3/src/protoc= ols/ec_tcp.c" on line 119, change the following line from: Code: opt_end =3D (u_char *)((int)tcp + tcp->off * 4); To: Code: opt_end =3D (u_char *)(tcp + tcp->off * 4); ...using your favorite text editor. Then, run the typical: Code: # make config # make build # make install After all of that, give the program a run or two, and see if it's working. Let us all know. -Brandon [Refer to FreeBSD Forum Thread: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3D15719] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 07:52:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AABA5106564A for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plaine@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A2E8FC16 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:52:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so6362060iwn.13 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:52:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=zA7gH7UwbMBVtoRPv8lu5CbPyWyo8LWmdJ3vwGlV9kU=; b=xmIsUri4ArO0avq3icAk5TvYFQqVfR11ikNHT3g+2BRo8cX8ewiDpIFDJVTXVQbxRe p/JmMi48tnIu8pmRGQ8CiX4Fn7o6rh6OvCTIl/wTiPJ2baJxt79t9qQinp8qavAhgpzq xLW5p+zQwbOG3xPXuum3qlTK5l//7KsUMzIBY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=S7f2j34SBT2LeB1kdPlPJw73V0lf6sR11hxpIpTHCI+y546YFWKUZhr7fUdUCBJfjC g++BtV//lx6dOP1Kw7E7obwnRk7mjccyegqObZ4oQY4jRm+jiu43Ow6dwBErmTlZmGje +w28y2zpaM9cM6k9ratIqnWGYRwPv0fUPFYp8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.176.202 with SMTP id bf10mr9118533icb.235.1296545359570; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:29:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.241.9 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:29:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:29:19 +0200 Message-ID: From: pepe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: ipv6 problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 07:52:23 -0000 I have 2001:14b8:10:402::/64 ipv6 from my isp and I cant get it working. Ifconfig should be ok: backup# ifconfig rl0 inet6 rl0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8 inet6 2001:14b8:10:402:2::1 prefixlen 64 default gateway is set to 2001:14b8:10:402:1::1. When I try to traceroute irc server for example I get this: traceroute6: Warning: irc.cc.tut.fi has multiple addresses; using 2001:708:310:4952:4320:5365:7276:6572 traceroute6 to irc.cc.tut.fi (2001:708:310:4952:4320:5365:7276:6572) from 2001:14b8:10:402:2::1, 64 hops max, 12 byte packets 1 2001:14b8:10:402:2::1 2026.908 ms !A 2999.587 ms !A 3000.423 ms !A So. Could this be problem in my configs or is this because of something wrong at the isp side? -- pepe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 13:09:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674FE106564A for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:09:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahman.linux@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2738FC1A for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:09:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so6492559qyk.13 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 05:09:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=WUBsYgjVZg5kz7fqtuJbkgD0jeDatBA4tcOiPAD+4tU=; b=D/BDQUgO5duO56apVxW7co4yaRZI2gpcEfxbWKnU+QXlrFmqKXxQ7ArLzynz+3FR70 CfidgyWY4efaGa+xf2krQf1qkUisyeMyZUJ3HgcPgX+FDhQu+xEKkNL02w5RypzdlqQq Vmt6or4PcSmrD+Akd6H0NqkuWB/lQ+K4Hw9KU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=DgI72ToNaxAbc2AX4NzbuAoTnCYyoXLyTEhwoccpt+PZEK7siSehow9iLARIUM8HID FQYQl0B+7urTs8fEGJRnhba6FO192N57uInxFeePQPXhHYXirvFmv9aTtlvOrWA4v4HI W57nL3rBj4nuXbJM+482TjSKhn6XzNNxkTW90= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.19.209 with SMTP id c17mr7510699qab.266.1296565749127; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 05:09:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.195.137 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 05:09:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:39:09 +0330 Message-ID: From: Bahman Kahinpour To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Using Megabyte, Gigabyte, ... in fdisk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:09:10 -0000 Hello, I have a small question. How may I use Kilobyte, Megabyte, ... in "fdisk" interactive mode? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 13:39:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2B9106564A for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:39:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7EA48FC18 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:39:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.186]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959275C44 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 23:46:38 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D480C43.6060301@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 23:36:03 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101227 Thunderbird/3.0.11 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Using Megabyte, Gigabyte, ... in fdisk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:39:34 -0000 On 02/01/11 23:09, Bahman Kahinpour wrote: > Hello, > I have a small question. How may I use Kilobyte, Megabyte, ... in > "fdisk" interactive mode? > > Usually just k, m, or g to the end of the digits you enter. HTH From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 13:49:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158231065672 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:49:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8298FC0A for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.186]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF755C44 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 23:56:22 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D480E8B.8050207@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 23:45:47 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101227 Thunderbird/3.0.11 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4D437DD6.4030202@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20110131113058.71d4e4e8@mr129041.univ-rennes1.fr> <4D4695D0.1040604@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: PF firewall rules and documentation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:49:17 -0000 On 02/01/11 00:40, Kevin Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 05:58, Da Rock > wrote: > > >> Yes. Me unfortunately, but I did manage to pick it up quite quickly though. >> I had a little thief attack one of my ports and attempt login on the >> firewall. I had to change it to 'block in $log on $ext_if all >> block out $log on $ext_if all' to actually block the traffic. Bit of a doozy >> really, I'm still monitoring the traffic very closely with tcpdump on the >> interface and not the log. >> > Unless you have an explicit need to block in/out, it's easier to > maintain a ruleset that uses > > block log on $ext_if > > For example, I use the following as a "starting point" for some of my > routing firewalls: > > ============================= > > int_if=bge1 > ext_if=bge0 > > set skip on lo > > # block everything > block > > # NAT rule > pass out log(all) on $ext_if from ($int_if:network) to any nat-to ($ext_if) > # allow traffic in on the internal interface > pass in on $int_if from ($int_if:network) to any keep state > > ============================= > > There are at least three things in that basic config that some people > would jump on me for. > > 1) why block all if I'm then allowing every in on the internal interface? > 2) why block all if I'm allowing everything out on the external interface? > 3) why not pass everything on the internal interface and then filter > on the external? > > The shortest answer is because I happen to like that starting point > and it serves as a syntactical reminder if I deploy without a pf > reference handy. > > Regarding 1) and 2), the longer answer is that I like to control > traffic flow. I don't want to allow inbound connections on the > external interface and I don't have a need for the firewall to connect > to machines inside the NAT. On my bridges I'll set skip on the > internal interface and filter on the other but I don't like doing that > for a router. > > No jumping here- just a big fat ditto! But that was the point of this whole thread- that block statement doesn't cut it. I started there and noticed a little sneak getting through anyway. Set it to the block explicitly and bam! No problem. Just a little heads up anyway... >>> There are some plans to update PF to a more recent version. So may >>> be it will be better. >>> >>> >> Actually, that sounds like a better idea than mine ;) Kills 2 birds with one >> stone then... >> > I am truly excited about this as the NAT and RDR stuff was > significantly cleaned up (and the OpenBSD pf FAQ is a great resource). > I'm even more excited about the patch to tcpdump that Daniel just sent > to freebsd-pf@ that allows you to tcpdump a pfsync device and pull the > state creation/updates - in my opinion, that's the weakest area for a > BSD firewall (we'll ignore span ports on routers since you can bridge > two addressed interfaces and create a span of that bridge) and being > able to easily pull those NAT translations fulfills some serious > accountability issues. > You think?! Man I was scratching a bit trying to translate between versions there- not too long, but long enough to a PITA. It would be nice to have it all nice and tidy... > If you need a reliable printed reference, you should really consider > picking up Hansteen's _The Book of PF_, available from No Starch > Press: > > http://nostarch.com/pf2.htm > > I have the first edition and it's incredible but somewhat dated. The > author suggests the second edition for FreeBSD 8.x+. > > kmw > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 13:55:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F291065674 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:55:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070E18FC25 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:55:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkGhF-00037a-HY for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:55:05 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:55:05 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:55:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:52:15 +0100 Lines: 6 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: Re: Using Megabyte, Gigabyte, ... in fdisk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:55:09 -0000 On 01/02/2011 14:09, Bahman Kahinpour wrote: > Hello, > I have a small question. How may I use Kilobyte, Megabyte, ... in > "fdisk" interactive mode? It is best not to use fdisk at all until it gets rewritten. Use gpart. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 14:32:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308691065670 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:32:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alessandro.baggi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87F88FC0A for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:32:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so6994890wyf.13 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:32:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QUuamtv+zZawE5DNiFVsmYrmqUPz1FYuKaSc8XdQecM=; b=L8TInspXUKqAiW6ozMX/YNfpA+JvgLpJI83y/J2J98yWOBN6ZSEefa76mEkEld3hFX PGY25PfVAPW11/V249T0l6JSZP8x0erfSQ/xYTkdEB8SCRAkeWdF2OkF5P/DwJ0OwqB1 3XmhGu/hjTzK4T01qjPxhJTYwWO40A6Z1xFvI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pyrQtD9CeV3SqWa+MdHJ0LDtb9dSLU+J89jkJh0TzNd4IRvzzQYXmF8b3keSzy3HmE 4//5qpOcN0gHkZnzYqpWi9dHvMwZUPfF7goZJdLZHJ55L0LEq3WEqaqUgSdZ/mS0u7CJ pY+DnZULKmEA7q16L+//xl4n+E3VgqlGOTpfU= Received: by 10.227.156.15 with SMTP id u15mr1043043wbw.220.1296570741716; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:32:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.4.58] (ip-75-125-ull.customer.panservice.it [212.66.125.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f35sm16112494wbf.14.2011.02.01.06.32.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:32:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100 From: Alessandro Baggi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; it; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:32:23 -0000 Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix? thanks in advance From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 14:39:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66FB10656C5 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:39:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.wilcox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yi0-f54.google.com (mail-yi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E878FC22 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yie19 with SMTP id 19so2641239yie.13 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:39:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=L8fo1b/9wfc5z7q1DWYbAH6piwai6pQEsdhYuJrBiX8=; b=Q6JY8Fjs+iAUDX/bT8cKypJLtJThIU2fWm70GnhNFxZthfAD/e1Fw8nAU2Q27AvH6b mKNeErtwH4VZbFp2y+r1Gjn23LqtlXTEKGSdhQ7vtUm1KqkQoKUo1ggIrXuqVLyO9SrM 5UTW0KNxithRDNA++r77XCFgcjMsjagDedDeQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=sMCjPVAIiv/YTBetqrhlSmhfcbiy5vpx2CqYqqBeXnEtKnagJno2RuiYHoRl6Z/dht Z18Q+R8wmZcqOi7aJeqGSSxbo5UwoJBiwCWbyPWgOEUcEYyuceKshHF2cMECkkA5RCU1 kmOslmWc1ijCKYyibs6MfBI89kUTWtVuUpUE8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.248.28 with SMTP id v28mr10653945agh.168.1296571161357; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:39:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.79.10 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 06:39:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:39:21 -0500 Message-ID: From: Kevin Wilcox To: Alessandro Baggi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:39:23 -0000 On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 09:32, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix? > > thanks in advance That's a loaded question. Both have advocates, just like "vi or emacs", "Linux or Nothing", "FreeBSD or OpenBSD", "OS X or Windows" and "X Window System or CLI". That said, if you know neither and your requirements are met by both of them, I'd opt for postfix. It isn't as burdened with dependencies and, from what I can tell, it enjoys a larger, more active support community. kmw From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 15:23:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A3A1065672 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:23:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA4308FC18 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxh35 with SMTP id 35so2660131yxh.13 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 07:23:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.100.14 with SMTP id x14mr10705620agb.56.1296573784764; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 07:23:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-070-216-068.nc.res.rr.com [71.70.216.68]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 50sm5303643yhl.29.2011.02.01.07.23.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 01 Feb 2011 07:23:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F264E54824 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:23:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:23:01 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20110201102301.2ae55810@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:23:06 -0000 On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100 Alessandro Baggi articulated: > Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix? "qmail" is not actively supported by its developer. It requires numerous patches, etc to bring it up to acceptable servicable standards. "Postfix" is actively maintained and is constantly being upgraded by its author. Its mail forum is robust and Postfix has outstanding documentation; perhaps the best of any software available in the FOSS world. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 15:23:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C564F1065697 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:23:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Received: from ifdnrg29.ifdnrg.com (outbound.ifdnrg.com [193.200.98.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63EFD8FC19 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:23:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.85] (93-97-172-73.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.172.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by ifdnrg29.ifdnrg.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p11FNiFm056295 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:23:44 GMT (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Message-ID: <4D48257F.7030800@ifdnrg.com> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:23:43 +0000 From: Paul Macdonald User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: serial config handbook: /boot.conf or /boot.config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:23:47 -0000 I'm trying to get the dell bmc +sol serial thing working, kin dof getting there, but noticed this inconsistency in the handbook: Is it boot.conf or boot.config? Create boot.config in the root directory of the a partition on the boot drive. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialconsole-setup.html#SERIALCONSOLE-HOWTO 7.2 Create the /boot.conf file http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/console-server/freebsd.html Paul. -- ------------------------- Paul Macdonald IFDNRG Ltd Web and video hosting ------------------------- t: 0131 5548070 m: 07534206249 e: paul@ifdnrg.com w: http://www.ifdnrg.com ------------------------- IFDNRG 40 Maritime Street Edinburgh EH6 6SA ------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 15:41:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3462106564A for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:41:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=0006ef84c5=johnl@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [64.57.183.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319798FC0A for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:41:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25059 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 15:14:38 -0000 Received: from mail1.iecc.com (64.57.183.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 1 Feb 2011 15:14:38 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=11d57.4d48235e.k1102; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=iuhLh0Iwc0qtVhWFAcvHBcl9lVNVJpSmUD+UA7sVMzw=; b=ORkwz9KMqjlllUZajOR7PEkatxWir8Bv2tedNFLXHGKDHj2nBdNeZfXD0I8rSFsMOuJTZiJZ81YUO9BXajjptWkYtedhoAlh03WaotcV7gn8FUCthQ7n7i7dAGmGLzhDPQyjv7hoQ7UJDjeRBY2pGoqt0xFasdLYflMRef/s7zE= VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org Date: 1 Feb 2011 15:14:38 -0000 Message-ID: <20110201151438.73046.qmail@joyce.lan> From: John Levine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: alessandro.baggi@gmail.com Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:41:20 -0000 I like qmail, but I would, having written a book about it. If you want something that works reasonably well out of the box, I'd use Postfix. If you want something you can tweak to do whatever you want, qmail is more of a toolkit. Don't use the version of qmail in ports, it includes way too many sloppily written patches. netqmail 1.06 is a reasonable place to start. http://qmail.org/netqmail/ I've replaced the qmail SMTP daemon with Bruce Guenter's mailfront, which is in the ports collection. It has a flexible plugin design which I've used to do better logging, spamassassin and DCC during the SMTP session, etc. Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 17:08:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D44B1065670 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 17:08:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18AC18FC17 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 17:07:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PkJhu-0004p9-MS for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:07:58 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PkJhu-00049F-Ix for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:07:58 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p11H7wvj005504 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 17:07:58 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p11H7wTl005503 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 17:07:58 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 17:07:58 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110201170757.GA5484@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: same function name in multiple archives - bad idea? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:08:00 -0000 Is it wrong to have functions with the same name in multiple archives? E.g: % ar -t /usr/local/lib/libslatec.a | grep fdump.o fdump.o % ar -t /usr/local/lib/libcmlib.a | grep fdump.o fdump.o Which "fdump" function will be used if I then link against -larchive1.a -larchive2.a? And is there an easy way to find functions belonging in multiple archives? Many thanks Anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 18:11:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E160106566C for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:11:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from PMahan@adaranet.com) Received: from barracuda.adaranet.com (smtp.adaranet.com [72.5.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0013F8FC13 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:11:46 +0000 (UTC) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1296583091-5549675f0001-jLrpzn Received: from SJ-EXCH-1.adaranet.com ([10.10.1.29]) by barracuda.adaranet.com with ESMTP id gdMcgV7CdPQccRjb; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:58:11 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: PMahan@adaranet.com Received: from SJ-EXCH-1.adaranet.com ([fe80::7042:d8c2:5973:c523]) by SJ-EXCH-1.adaranet.com ([fe80::7042:d8c2:5973:c523%14]) with mapi; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:58:11 -0800 From: Patrick Mahan X-Barracuda-BBL-IP: fe80::7042:d8c2:5973:c523 X-Barracuda-RBL-IP: fe80::7042:d8c2:5973:c523 To: Paul Macdonald , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:58:08 -0800 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: serial config handbook: /boot.conf or /boot.config Thread-Topic: serial config handbook: /boot.conf or /boot.config Thread-Index: AcvCJCCpwOkKP0ZqRVuE6YxdLGpVKgAFT9BA Message-ID: <32AB5C9615CC494997D9ABB1DB12783C024CC075B2@SJ-EXCH-1.adaranet.com> References: <4D48257F.7030800@ifdnrg.com> In-Reply-To: <4D48257F.7030800@ifdnrg.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[10.10.1.29] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1296583091 X-Barracuda-URL: http://172.16.10.203:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at adaranet.com Cc: Subject: RE: serial config handbook: /boot.conf or /boot.config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:11:47 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Paul Macdonald > Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 7:24 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: serial config handbook: /boot.conf or /boot.config > > > I'm trying to get the dell bmc +sol serial thing working, kin dof > getting there, but noticed this inconsistency in the handbook: > > Is it boot.conf or boot.config? > > Create boot.config in the root directory of the a partition on the boot > drive. > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialconsole- > setup.html#SERIALCONSOLE-HOWTO > > 7.2 Create the /boot.conf file > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/console- > server/freebsd.html > Here on my HP Proliant 350's I use - /boot.conf This is with FreeBSD 8.0. Patrick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 18:21:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970AF106564A for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:21:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from PMahan@adaranet.com) Received: from barracuda.adaranet.com (smtp.adaranet.com [72.5.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784C68FC14 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:21:46 +0000 (UTC) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1296583430-5549676a0001-jLrpzn Received: from SJ-EXCH-1.adaranet.com ([10.10.1.29]) by barracuda.adaranet.com with ESMTP id YCPCfgjNlPFxVOjf; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:03:50 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: PMahan@adaranet.com Received: from SJ-EXCH-1.adaranet.com ([fe80::7042:d8c2:5973:c523]) by SJ-EXCH-1.adaranet.com ([fe80::7042:d8c2:5973:c523%14]) with mapi; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:03:50 -0800 From: Patrick Mahan X-Barracuda-BBL-IP: fe80::7042:d8c2:5973:c523 X-Barracuda-RBL-IP: fe80::7042:d8c2:5973:c523 To: Anton Shterenlikht , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:03:49 -0800 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: same function name in multiple archives - bad idea? Thread-Topic: same function name in multiple archives - bad idea? Thread-Index: AcvCMr2LsscjCzvGRdWK4N5ORAS20QABvO7A Message-ID: <32AB5C9615CC494997D9ABB1DB12783C024CC075B6@SJ-EXCH-1.adaranet.com> References: <20110201170757.GA5484@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110201170757.GA5484@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[10.10.1.29] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1296583430 X-Barracuda-URL: http://172.16.10.203:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at adaranet.com Cc: Subject: RE: same function name in multiple archives - bad idea? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:21:46 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Anton Shterenlikht > Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 9:08 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: same function name in multiple archives - bad idea? > > Is it wrong to have functions with the same name > in multiple archives? E.g: > > % ar -t /usr/local/lib/libslatec.a | grep fdump.o > fdump.o > % ar -t /usr/local/lib/libcmlib.a | grep fdump.o > fdump.o > > Which "fdump" function will be used if I then link > against -larchive1.a -larchive2.a? > > And is there an easy way to find functions belonging > in multiple archives? > Anton, I believe for ELF images the linker will stop looking after finding it, so = the order of -l controls which one will be used. If you want to see w= hich one was used during linking, use the ld options '-M -Map --cref' = which will create a map file with cross references. Patrick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 18:27:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E77106566B for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:27:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from the.lists@mgm51.com) Received: from oneyou.mcmli.com (oneyou.mcmli.com [216.194.67.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E5A8FC13 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sentry.24cl.com (c-76-28-47-52.hsd1.ct.comcast.net [76.28.47.52]) by oneyou.mcmli.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61A4284BA for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:27:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from BigBloat (unknown [10.23.90.40]) by sentry.24cl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BA11FBBE for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:27:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <201102011326580606.004CE418@sentry.24cl.com> In-Reply-To: <20110201102301.2ae55810@scorpio> References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> <20110201102301.2ae55810@scorpio> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.09.1098 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (P) Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:26:58 -0500 From: "Mike." To: "FreeBSD" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:27:01 -0000 On 2/1/2011 at 10:23 AM Jerry wrote: |On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100 |Alessandro Baggi articulated: | |> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix? | |"qmail" is not actively supported by its developer. It requires |numerous patches, etc to bring it up to acceptable servicable standards. | |"Postfix" is actively maintained and is constantly being upgraded by |its author. Its mail forum is robust and Postfix has outstanding |documentation; perhaps the best of any software available in the FOSS |world. ============= It is a good thing I read all the replies before I posted mine, as your reply is almost word-for-word identical to what I was going to say. :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 18:30:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3C01065772 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:30:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA778FC1A for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:30:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so3460875ewy.13 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:30:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=m1/hi2v7mdF8i94CbdmcEPQpuFIfjktJUHyOr3ZJbFU=; b=Ns+K7gBHzWt60ceCrCreHBrHA4ypgD7ewKs2mvPS8tfeRsMbOzIcZJTQKCSkVaPM5i /tRbxQmypDCWjiyI1O0y62/XkwST6An2od7A/SuOEzVMs/5/PTmDDt0lOt13BEoYol7b UMjyRTTLFpEy4emciZeBmavfGinc1rNDKE9TU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=GD/Eec8QFLg4kTM6qTFJ7CYN6qceZiFfMMp59qxQEqJtTxh75wH/bTTD1i7u34Yt66 rbbami1xOLKaH8FfkrDmsjFfC22RIoosa4J89+bnynBbHwFByxg/4V9guFRQEq20ryQ9 pojjSe3ow4ZRTNHrKmS/bMAvzKX85Sjjqu+ic= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.119.14 with SMTP id m14mr298700eeh.24.1296585020298; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:30:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.48.75 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:30:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201102011326580606.004CE418@sentry.24cl.com> References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> <20110201102301.2ae55810@scorpio> <201102011326580606.004CE418@sentry.24cl.com> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:30:20 -0500 Message-ID: From: Outback Dingo To: "Mike." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:30:34 -0000 On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Mike. wrote: > On 2/1/2011 at 10:23 AM Jerry wrote: > > |On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100 > |Alessandro Baggi articulated: > | > |> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix? > | > |"qmail" is not actively supported by its developer. It requires > |numerous patches, etc to bring it up to acceptable servicable > standards. > | > |"Postfix" is actively maintained and is constantly being upgraded by > |its author. Its mail forum is robust and Postfix has outstanding > |documentation; perhaps the best of any software available in the FOSS > |world. > ============= > > > It is a good thing I read all the replies before I posted mine, as your > reply is almost word-for-word identical to what I was going to say. :) Postfix hands down is better, recent, well maintained and excellently documented From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 18:31:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67F21065782 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:31:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A428FC15 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:31:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyf6 with SMTP id 6so3476349eyf.13 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:31:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=qLLiHYLtFM2XzypPEGsXDjd48dfaJgni6lycK3zwp4I=; b=rtUQRwx2vnUNCoCGMPfghwpcZppV9ftrZL+Bu1UYlqr9clh7mLNngFZXDYld6mEP/C AgbYs7pSA9bKLufr51/NfLofwAHdo+lsGUEledX49P9IUOIFHyrClrI+J/M+6QfqyC/4 XG2uKC4z1UHsMgk5V3hxUg0GSUG9twBjMprk8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=CDCFSEyy5zC0mYvRbh8Hyb9a2XZJl8sDM21Ku+zMJ4wW2urZ67nvSFer/Ld+6CCDtl ygoR5NSHQq+x4/5OfF7325ZsE9/0Y14sadOWNMMb1MA7kt8mHBjfRO/PTBDAyotI5P9r UnrJlMb1ylT1saXcb1kC85TTEsD1SJB3qUY30= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.10.208 with SMTP id 56mr1384836eev.31.1296585066983; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:31:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.48.75 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:31:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201102011326580606.004CE418@sentry.24cl.com> References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> <20110201102301.2ae55810@scorpio> <201102011326580606.004CE418@sentry.24cl.com> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:31:06 -0500 Message-ID: From: Outback Dingo To: "Mike." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:31:09 -0000 On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Mike. wrote: > On 2/1/2011 at 10:23 AM Jerry wrote: > > |On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100 > |Alessandro Baggi articulated: > | > |> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix? > | > |"qmail" is not actively supported by its developer. It requires > |numerous patches, etc to bring it up to acceptable servicable > standards. > | > |"Postfix" is actively maintained and is constantly being upgraded by > |its author. Its mail forum is robust and Postfix has outstanding > |documentation; perhaps the best of any software available in the FOSS > |world. > ============= > > > It is a good thing I read all the replies before I posted mine, as your > reply is almost word-for-word identical to what I was going to say. :) yeah... what he said... !!! :) > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 19:48:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADADD1065672 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 19:48:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from red.stonehenge.com (red.stonehenge.com [IPv6:2607:f2f8:3080::]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A358FC28 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 19:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by red.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 52D2A28EC; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:48:03 -0800 (PST) From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: Outback Dingo References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> <20110201102301.2ae55810@scorpio> <201102011326580606.004CE418@sentry.24cl.com> x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.18.1.11; tzolkin = 4 Chuen; haab = 4 Pax Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:48:03 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Outback Dingo's message of "Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:31:06 -0500") Message-ID: <861v3rzgcs.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Mike." , FreeBSD Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:48:03 -0000 >>>>> "Outback" == Outback Dingo writes: >> |"Postfix" is actively maintained and is constantly being upgraded by >> |its author. Its mail forum is robust and Postfix has outstanding >> |documentation; perhaps the best of any software available in the FOSS >> |world. >> ============= >> >> >> It is a good thing I read all the replies before I posted mine, as your >> reply is almost word-for-word identical to what I was going to say. :) Outback> yeah... what he said... !!! :) +1 :) No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix, and pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :) But I've never found postfix without a knob to do something I want it to do, and most of the knobs are set properly right out of the box. (And reasonably named too!) -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 19:52:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08931065672 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 19:52:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email2.allantgroup.com (email2.emsphone.com [199.67.51.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B0C8FC1B for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 19:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email2.allantgroup.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p11JqEIB076997 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:52:14 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p11JqEFb097323 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:52:14 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p11JqD23097315; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:52:13 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:52:13 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Patrick Mahan Message-ID: <20110201195213.GR75125@dan.emsphone.com> References: <4D48257F.7030800@ifdnrg.com> <32AB5C9615CC494997D9ABB1DB12783C024CC075B2@SJ-EXCH-1.adaranet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <32AB5C9615CC494997D9ABB1DB12783C024CC075B2@SJ-EXCH-1.adaranet.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.4 at email2.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (email2.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:52:15 -0600 (CST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 199.67.51.78 Cc: Paul Macdonald , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: serial config handbook: /boot.conf or /boot.config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:52:23 -0000 In the last episode (Feb 01), Patrick Mahan said: > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Paul Macdonald > > I'm trying to get the dell bmc +sol serial thing working, kin dof > > getting there, but noticed this inconsistency in the handbook: > > > > Is it boot.conf or boot.config? > > > > Create boot.config in the root directory of the a partition on the boot > > drive. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialconsole-setup.html#SERIALCONSOLE-HOWTO > > > > 7.2 Create the /boot.conf file > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/console-server/freebsd.html > > Here on my HP Proliant 350's I use - > > /boot.conf > > This is with FreeBSD 8.0. I don't see anything in /usr/src/sys/boot that reads a "/boot.conf". boot2 reads "/boot.config", and the loader will read "/boot/boot.conf" but that path is deprecated. I have -D in /boot.config on my SOL-enabled Dell 1950, which allows for both serial and keyboard input during the boot process. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 20:11:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D492106564A for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:11:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from PMahan@adaranet.com) Received: from barracuda.adaranet.com (smtp.adaranet.com [72.5.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1304A8FC1B for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:11:45 +0000 (UTC) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1296590139-554969280001-jLrpzn Received: from SJ-EXCH-1.adaranet.com ([10.10.1.29]) by barracuda.adaranet.com with ESMTP id dFp2duHshlXEGQDi; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:55:39 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: PMahan@adaranet.com Received: from SJ-EXCH-1.adaranet.com ([fe80::7042:d8c2:5973:c523]) by SJ-EXCH-1.adaranet.com ([fe80::7042:d8c2:5973:c523%14]) with mapi; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:55:39 -0800 From: Patrick Mahan X-Barracuda-BBL-IP: fe80::7042:d8c2:5973:c523 X-Barracuda-RBL-IP: fe80::7042:d8c2:5973:c523 To: Dan Nelson Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:55:27 -0800 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: serial config handbook: /boot.conf or /boot.config Thread-Topic: serial config handbook: /boot.conf or /boot.config Thread-Index: AcvCSYhpmDcC3e4uSM6Mig8rVdT0CAAAGEMg Message-ID: <32AB5C9615CC494997D9ABB1DB12783C024CC075D8@SJ-EXCH-1.adaranet.com> References: <4D48257F.7030800@ifdnrg.com> <32AB5C9615CC494997D9ABB1DB12783C024CC075B2@SJ-EXCH-1.adaranet.com> <20110201195213.GR75125@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20110201195213.GR75125@dan.emsphone.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-cr-hashedpuzzle: FQH7 H0V+ I+pi I/eY NRMN NkTE N2cB OGrq Qq2m RYZl VBic W+rP dTgG fCu8 g7Re howD; 3; ZABuAGUAbABzAG8AbgBAAGEAbABsAGEAbgB0AGcAcgBvAHUAcAAuAGMAbwBtADsAZgByAGUAZQBiAHMAZAAtAHEAdQBlAHMAdABpAG8AbgBzAEAAZgByAGUAZQBiAHMAZAAuAG8AcgBnADsAcABhAHUAbABAAGkAZgBkAG4AcgBnAC4AYwBvAG0A; Sosha1_v1; 7; {82B7DA41-5110-41B5-BD32-E85EECB9BAC8}; cABtAGEAaABhAG4AQABhAGQAYQByAGEAbgBlAHQALgBjAG8AbQA=; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:55:27 GMT; UgBFADoAIABzAGUAcgBpAGEAbAAgAGMAbwBuAGYAaQBnACAAaABhAG4AZABiAG8AbwBrADoAIAAgAC8AYgBvAG8AdAAuAGMAbwBuAGYAIABvAHIAIAAvAGIAbwBvAHQALgBjAG8AbgBmAGkAZwA= x-cr-puzzleid: {82B7DA41-5110-41B5-BD32-E85EECB9BAC8} acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[10.10.1.29] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1296590139 X-Barracuda-URL: http://172.16.10.203:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at adaranet.com Cc: Paul Macdonald , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: serial config handbook: /boot.conf or /boot.config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:11:46 -0000 It's at the root - # echo /boot.conf -P Patrick ---------------------------------------------------- Patrick Mahan Lead Technical Kernel Engineer Adara Networks Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are solely the responsibility of th= e author and are not to be construed as an official opinion of Adara Networks. > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Nelson [mailto:dnelson@allantgroup.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 11:52 AM > To: Patrick Mahan > Cc: Paul Macdonald; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: serial config handbook: /boot.conf or /boot.config > > In the last episode (Feb 01), Patrick Mahan said: > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Paul Macdonald > > > I'm trying to get the dell bmc +sol serial thing working, kin dof > > > getting there, but noticed this inconsistency in the handbook: > > > > > > Is it boot.conf or boot.config? > > > > > > Create boot.config in the root directory of the a partition on the bo= ot > > > drive. > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859- > 1/books/handbook/serialconsole-setup.html#SERIALCONSOLE-HOWTO > > > > > > 7.2 Create the /boot.conf file > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/console- > server/freebsd.html > > > > Here on my HP Proliant 350's I use - > > > > /boot.conf > > > > This is with FreeBSD 8.0. > > I don't see anything in /usr/src/sys/boot that reads a "/boot.conf". boo= t2 > reads "/boot.config", and the loader will read "/boot/boot.conf" but that > path is deprecated. > > I have -D in /boot.config on my SOL-enabled Dell 1950, which allows for > both > serial and keyboard input during the boot process. > > -- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 20:16:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8991065672 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:16:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahman.linux@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9DB8FC2D for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:16:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so6949615qwj.13 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 12:16:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=q/1XmxXh9VOYybMs3XoLsWbLS2Gzgy/sFVI6P+Qg8NY=; b=XQI0s8GVVVCICYLxqELPjQGQeJMMdQfiCfQfWMmQH2AVlz7z4Ug5HbB7Ec6sVlbzn7 JM3lWCQwtVuO1uqGXT9Eiapm1QlXszKCMA0XPikST5vjzP4JdIVleOXZWX1CYIlemXL1 gRln7QZOE8ZVqCIl2L+/mE2ObIV1AF8/HDw4U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=x3j3qn6eMgt644GLC9Y/VcTNYuaJE68qydvVaJKfBKV587WdBMGI39KkpJyykjEkSP Rgg4ecooMfnReqEp5XE5lbMBslX1atVXhJozaI8axGROhhARGSUpj+OhqdVDVbbAnE0K AN/Vh06HZehq6vYlzqubW5koQSsw53Zlc/hxU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.37.20 with SMTP id v20mr7856743qad.216.1296591400768; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 12:16:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.195.137 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 12:16:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 23:46:40 +0330 Message-ID: From: Bahman Kahinpour To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Make FreeBSD read the slice table and partition table again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:16:42 -0000 Hello When I destroy the partition table with the following command: # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad1 bs=1k count=10 The entries /dev/ad1s1a, ... still exist in /dev. This means that the kernel has not found out that the slices and partitions do not exist anymore. How may I make the kernel read the slice/partition table again? Something like modprobe command in Linux? Thanks in advance From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 20:29:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6324106566B for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:29:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668FB8FC14 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:29:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyf6 with SMTP id 6so3583467eyf.13 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 12:29:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=E1DMpAh/AYmwEmxx4mhLFGUfCaOVjrkIen8QbsMuM24=; b=LnnmGwRrNyA18RiKq2Ml2ryQmZW6PpX74jB9wiM4IZ5GLgkMkRcZTMMUqldGq5nJkW D/RtUlmBCYsfgg8LfPuIKizsIae2IPJn55kLgk3pFDFu1pjA0S4u1Kq4sZTJNSGexvzV ubr2pl5yLoiAFClyICtkJ3wVp3/WF3e7lbjAo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=jptJ02nK8vZ33Lz+AIw5lEk40YsrBrS4HS4CHxmd1xh4+oSoGpqvXl73buasw3xmrO Ob9rJ5Q2rgkfXN2y91s/lRskynp+XYhIpq0rkfXfXv2Srv2w3B+SEGUw9UTm0sJozc// hnY7eH+TCmqo0uJuTaPiIwoqoTiE/fqKyksr4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.85.204 with SMTP id p12mr7892906fal.146.1296592167256; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 12:29:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.114.4 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 12:29:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:29:27 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Bahman Kahinpour Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Make FreeBSD read the slice table and partition table again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:29:28 -0000 On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Bahman Kahinpour wrote: > Hello > When I destroy the partition table with the following command: > # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad1 bs=1k count=10 > The entries /dev/ad1s1a, ... still exist in /dev. This means that the > kernel has not found out that the slices and partitions do not exist > anymore. > Um AFAIK, GEOM tastes the provider on closing so that command should have updated the device entries. And it works properly in VM here so I'm unsure the problem you are having. A "true > /dev/ad1" would also cause GEOM to retaste it. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 20:44:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53B2106566B for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:44:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Received: from ifdnrg29.ifdnrg.com (outbound.ifdnrg.com [193.200.98.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC378FC19 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.85] (93-97-172-73.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.172.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by ifdnrg29.ifdnrg.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p11KiP5a061143 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:44:25 GMT (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Message-ID: <4D4870A8.3060706@ifdnrg.com> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:44:24 +0000 From: Paul Macdonald User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: FreeBSD References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> <20110201102301.2ae55810@scorpio> <201102011326580606.004CE418@sentry.24cl.com> <861v3rzgcs.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> In-Reply-To: <861v3rzgcs.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:44:28 -0000 On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > > No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix, and > pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :) > > But I've never found postfix without a knob to do something I want it to > do, and most of the knobs are set properly right out of the box. (And > reasonably named too!) > so for us folks still using sendmail (which works fine for me) what benefits do we get with postfix that'd outweigh the hassles of changing? -- ------------------------- Paul Macdonald IFDNRG Ltd Web and video hosting ------------------------- t: 0131 5548070 m: 07534206249 e: paul@ifdnrg.com w: http://www.ifdnrg.com ------------------------- IFDNRG 40 Maritime Street Edinburgh EH6 6SA ------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 21:04:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82EFA106564A for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:04:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EAB8FC0A for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:04:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so2839073gyf.13 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:04:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.203.5 with SMTP id a5mr1561924ybg.323.1296594288244; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:04:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-070-216-068.nc.res.rr.com [71.70.216.68]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v8sm14436724yba.2.2011.02.01.13.04.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:04:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF6EEE54824 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:04:45 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:04:44 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20110201160444.0fd512f3@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4D4870A8.3060706@ifdnrg.com> References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> <20110201102301.2ae55810@scorpio> <201102011326580606.004CE418@sentry.24cl.com> <861v3rzgcs.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <4D4870A8.3060706@ifdnrg.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 21:04:49 -0000 On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:44:24 +0000 Paul Macdonald articulated: > so for us folks still using sendmail (which works fine for me) > what benefits do we get with postfix that'd outweigh the hassles of > changing? Without knowing your exact configuration and requirements, answering that question is at best a guess. In addition, as a long time subscriber to the theory, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it", the only way to ascertain that answer would be to study the Postfix documentation and then decide if it offers better methods of doing whatever it is you are now doing with your present MTA and if changing MTAs would serve a useful purpose. Postfix-2.8 has an impressive feature, "postscreen" built into it. You can check the documentation for its use and implementation. I don't believe that Sendmail has any such native function. The Postfix forum could provide answers to any reasonable question that you might have regarding the two MTAs. I have no knowledge of what support is available for Sendmail. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 21:59:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366A51065693 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:59:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy3-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.54.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1C538FC0C for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:59:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9442 invoked by uid 0); 1 Feb 2011 21:59:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 21:59:30 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=iA1RVg4+4ZUdEKqhymjowoCPCniy3UXhLjEp8Ud7QEwuMDuuxJHwTGJOCagkmgWkbSxUAwlgpo+8RZilSqcf/y/Snxvw0apaLmiuUQjZNrZG/yb2iUMb+YOMUYPi4STA; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkOG1-0005vg-Hr for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:59:30 -0700 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:49:44 -0700 Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:49:44 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20110201214944.GA233@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> <20110201102301.2ae55810@scorpio> <201102011326580606.004CE418@sentry.24cl.com> <861v3rzgcs.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <4D4870A8.3060706@ifdnrg.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D4870A8.3060706@ifdnrg.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 21:59:32 -0000 --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 08:44:24PM +0000, Paul Macdonald wrote: > On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > > > >No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix, and > >pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :) > > > >But I've never found postfix without a knob to do something I want it to > >do, and most of the knobs are set properly right out of the box. (And > >reasonably named too!) > > > so for us folks still using sendmail (which works fine for me) >=20 > what benefits do we get with postfix that'd outweigh the hassles of=20 > changing? Probably nothing, if you're asking about changing a current MTA deployment when you're satisfied with what you have. If you are looking for an alternative to replace what you have because of frustrations with your current setup, or if you are considering new deployments and whether it is worthwhile to learn something new, that is another story altogether. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk1If/gACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXc8QCeOyAcQSqDbuwx0UnKIFGHFTwX ZWgAn3TdxgnCNmtMPTFqRiWtkvwBXKrw =SV/x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 23:02:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C80C10656A9 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 23:02:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from clegendre@zeropenalty.com) Received: from tormoxadmin01.zeropenalty.com (mailbox01.netpresentservices.com [96.45.197.76]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D078FC21 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 23:02:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.70.2.200] (206-223-191-5.beanfield.net [206.223.191.5] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by tormoxadmin01.zeropenalty.com (8.14.4/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p11MpaOt002588 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 17:51:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from clegendre@zeropenalty.com) Message-ID: <4D488F01.6030800@zeropenalty.com> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:53:53 -0500 From: Colin Legendre Organization: Zero Penalty User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.5 at tormoxadmin01.zeropenalty.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Issues with ar0(Host Raid) adaptec after upgrade to 8.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: clegendre@zeropenalty.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 23:02:20 -0000 Hey All, I'm having an odd issue, and the only thing I can imagine is that there has been a major change between 8.1 and 8.2. Using the 8.1 kernel everything is dandy. But when I try to use a newly compiled kernel from 8.2(GENERIC) I have no luck. Root will not mount. Here are relevant kernel messages under 8.1... FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 #2: Mon Jan 31 19:25:14 EST 2011 atapci2: port 0x30d8-0x30df,0x30cc-0x30cf,0x30d0-0x30d7,0x30c8-0x30cb,0x3060-0x307f mem 0xc0000400-0xc00007ff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 atapci2: [ITHREAD] atapci2: AHCI called from vendor specific driver atapci2: AHCI v1.10 controller with 4 3Gbps ports, PM not supported ata4: on atapci2 ata4: [ITHREAD] ata5: on atapci2 ata5: [ITHREAD] ad8: 286168MB at ata4-master UDMA100 SATA 3Gb/s ad10: 286168MB at ata5-master UDMA100 SATA 3Gb/s ar0: 286168MB status: READY ar0: disk0 READY (master) using ad8 at ata4-master ar0: disk1 READY (mirror) using ad10 at ata5-master GEOM: ad8s1: geometry does not match label (255h,63s != 16h,63s). GEOM: ad10s1: geometry does not match label (255h,63s != 16h,63s). GEOM: ufsid/4bb50de139c19cf4: geometry does not match label (255h,63s != 16h,63s). Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ar0s1a WARNING: ufsid/47f409368a08243c expected rawoffset 0, found 63 WARNING: ufsid/4bb50de139c19cf4 expected rawoffset 0, found 63 WARNING: ar0s1a expected rawoffset 0, found 63 WARNING: ad10s1a expected rawoffset 0, found 63 WARNING: ad8s1a expected rawoffset 0, found 63 WARNING: ar0s1 expected rawoffset 0, found 63 WARNING: ad10s1 expected rawoffset 0, found 63 WARNING: ad8s1 expected rawoffset 0, found 63 GEOM: ufsid/4bb50de139c19cf4c: geometry does not match label (255h,63s != 16h,63s). GEOM: ad10s1a: geometry does not match label (255h,63s != 16h,63s). GEOM: ad10s1c: geometry does not match label (255h,63s != 16h,63s). GEOM: ad8s1a: geometry does not match label (255h,63s != 16h,63s). GEOM: ad8s1c: geometry does not match label (255h,63s != 16h,63s). Under 8.2 I don't see... --->atapci2: AHCI called from vendor specific driver --->atapci2: AHCI v1.10 controller with 4 3Gbps ports, PM not supported at all, I don't see the drives, nothing It drops to the 'mountroot' prompt and when I do ? the only drive I see is the cd drive. If I boot back with to 'kernel.old' which is 8.1 Release I have no issues. Any ideas? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 01:32:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632F6106566C for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 01:32:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EA68FC14 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 01:32:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p121Vm40004175; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:31:48 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p121VmtQ004172; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:31:48 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:31:48 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Patrick Mahan In-Reply-To: <32AB5C9615CC494997D9ABB1DB12783C024CC075D8@SJ-EXCH-1.adaranet.com> Message-ID: References: <4D48257F.7030800@ifdnrg.com> <32AB5C9615CC494997D9ABB1DB12783C024CC075B2@SJ-EXCH-1.adaranet.com> <20110201195213.GR75125@dan.emsphone.com> <32AB5C9615CC494997D9ABB1DB12783C024CC075D8@SJ-EXCH-1.adaranet.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:31:48 -0700 (MST) Cc: Paul Macdonald , Dan Nelson , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: serial config handbook: /boot.conf or /boot.config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 01:32:03 -0000 On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Patrick Mahan wrote: > It's at the root - > > # echo /boot.conf > -P Line 78 of sys/boot/i386/boot2/boot2.c says: #define PATH_CONFIG "/boot.config" Also, there's boot.config(5). If boot.conf also works, maybe it's only looking for a match on the first 8 or 9 characters. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 01:50:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0652F1065672 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 01:50:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75C98FC16 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 01:50:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p121oa73004251; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:50:36 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p121oZ0x004248; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:50:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:50:35 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Patrick Mahan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <4D48257F.7030800@ifdnrg.com> <32AB5C9615CC494997D9ABB1DB12783C024CC075B2@SJ-EXCH-1.adaranet.com> <20110201195213.GR75125@dan.emsphone.com> <32AB5C9615CC494997D9ABB1DB12783C024CC075D8@SJ-EXCH-1.adaranet.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:50:36 -0700 (MST) Cc: Paul Macdonald , Dan Nelson , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: serial config handbook: /boot.conf or /boot.config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 01:50:46 -0000 On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Patrick Mahan wrote: > >> It's at the root - >> >> # echo /boot.conf >> -P > > Line 78 of sys/boot/i386/boot2/boot2.c says: > > #define PATH_CONFIG "/boot.config" > > Also, there's boot.config(5). If boot.conf also works, maybe it's only > looking for a match on the first 8 or 9 characters. Just tested this on an 8.1-stable VM, with a file containing only a "-s" (no quotes): /boot.conf - no effect /boot.config - boots into single-user mode From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 02:31:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39A1106564A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 02:31:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.59.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95DEE8FC0C for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 02:31:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta24.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.76]) by qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2qGH1g0051ei1Bg5CqHosR; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 02:17:48 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta24.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2qHl1g00M46zqiB3kqHnAe; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 02:17:48 +0000 Message-ID: <4D48BEC7.4030705@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:17:43 -0800 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110131 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Opening Opera as user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 02:31:03 -0000 I installed linux-opera, and I guess I made a mistake by opening it the first time as root, when I should have opened as user. At any rate, I can now only open the browser as root, and when I do I get this message: opera: $HOME set to /root. Use -personaldir if you do not want to use /root/.opera/ Can someone give me a heads up on how to fix this, as the above message is a mystery to me. Thank you! Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 02:43:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4648C1065675 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 02:43:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 839273@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E718FC23 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 02:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj21 with SMTP id 21so2973449gwj.13 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:43:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=/0OpifWwkxyVEOWY4Rv4oB41ROdCKKG42btArBga2CI=; b=We0KB89pcvJm0b2tSDBcXig1uNF7D2ZTM8HuLyrBo0BypkxBo0GjDIPuf6uBFYuHbJ 2kdtr16ISR5cfeHkxMKyijlHEV+UK4zh32wtIrC538I+9h9sk4IPX0+dNduDaQCNtiTf ybrxp4bX4KJHatwY99dsxJ1NHLgCF9ew9e9is= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=q6Fr7K5cNe761AMKaBQ+wyQ8Ydl0ADYRqUw44OTjoMLdZktT5Kb4xjGArzKca7GRrL b67xN18X4Uq5x2V/RjWF6pzJlJleNhH586KChxGsUjSR+wv2y+TBZBTEXvTyujlPG4ml 4951eOwflZRg67GKzRuYHMuK8S+Xd3M/LIqmk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.219.8 with SMTP id r8mr10098932ybg.401.1296612697722; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:11:37 -0800 (PST) Sender: 839273@gmail.com Received: by 10.151.110.10 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:11:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:41:37 -0430 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7KwopjlnfyiPiH-u8TEp-n3J4JU Message-ID: From: Andres Perera To: Alessandro Baggi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: 839273@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 02:43:40 -0000 On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix? qmail is more secure... but the design is just as alien to unix as sendmail is for example, the fact that qmail uses custom libc, or at least did so on the version i tried. that turns off certain maintainers, and it would put me off aswell postfix on the other hand is more in tune with the rest of the system > > thanks in advance > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 03:09:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A812106564A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 03:09:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from EXHUB015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034D28FC17 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 03:09:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from philip.hq.rws (174.79.184.239) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:59:06 -0800 Message-ID: <4D48C873.4050703@p6m7g8.com> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 02:58:59 +0000 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6M7G8 Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101213 Thunderbird/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig513E1A527410FB36D4033F9F" Cc: Subject: Replacing failed disk in raidz2 zfs (and gpt) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 03:09:10 -0000 --------------enig513E1A527410FB36D4033F9F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, I have a zroot(mirror)+zmysql(raidz2) setup on a MySQL db box. One drive failed (mfid3). We've since replaced it. I can't for the life of me get zpool to replace it. I can't remember why I used gpt instead of direct disks for the zmysql pool (but thats how it is). I've tried all of the following commands with different errors, and I must say I'm stumped. I've done this several times before for the ASF (but no gpt at play there). $ zpool scrub zmysql just runs, and completes, no error $ zpool replace zmysql gpt/disk3 cannot replace gpt/disk3 with gpt/disk3: one or more devices is currently unavailable $ zpool remove zmysql gpt/disk3 cannot remove gpt/disk3: only inactive hot spares or cache devices can be removed $ zpool offline zmysql gpt/disk3 cannot offline gpt/disk3: no valid replicas $ zpool add zmysql gpt/disk3 invalid vdev specification use '-f' to override the following errors: mismatched replication level: pool uses raidz and new vdev is disk I would say thats b/c I didn't run gpt commands on it, but see below. I think got copied over via raid card pass through, or it just hasn't rescaned it yet. $ zpool online zmysql gpt/disk3 warning: device 'gpt/disk3' onlined, but remains in faulted state use 'zpool replace' to replace devices that are no longer present $ zpool add zmysql spare gpt/disk3 cannot add to 'zmysql': one or more devices is currently unavailable $ zpool replace zmysql gpt/disk3 gpt/disk3 cannot replace gpt/disk3 with gpt/disk3: one or more devices is currently unavailable Below is some system information. More details on request. No, I can not import/export the pool, or reboot the box. Thanks in advance! $ zpool status -v zmysql pool: zmysql state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is missing or invalid. Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue functioning in a degraded state. action: Replace the device using 'zpool replace'. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-4J scrub: scrub completed after 0h16m with 0 errors on Tue Feb 1 21:13:41 2011 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM zmysql DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz2 DEGRADED 0 0 0 gpt/disk2 ONLINE 0 0 0 gpt/disk3 UNAVAIL 15 6.96M 0 experienced I/O failur= es gpt/disk4 ONLINE 0 0 0 gpt/disk5 ONLINE 0 0 0 gpt/disk6 ONLINE 0 0 0 gpt/disk7 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors $ zpool upgrade This system is currently running ZFS pool version 13. All pools are formatted using this version. $ zfs upgrade This system is currently running ZFS filesystem version 3. All filesystems are formatted with the current version. $ hd -v /dev/mfid3p1 | head hd: /dev/mfid3p1: Input/output error $ hd -v /dev/gpt/disk3 | head hd: /dev/gpt/disk3: Input/output error $ ls /dev/mfid3* crw-r----- 1 root operator - 0, 97 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 mfid3 crw-r----- 1 root operator - 0, 107 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 mfid3p1 crw-r----- 1 root operator - 0, 108 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 mfid3p2 crw-r----- 1 root operator - 0, 109 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 mfid3p3 $ ls /dev/gpt total 1 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel - 512 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 ./ dr-xr-xr-x 7 root wheel - 512 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 ../ crw-r----- 1 root operator - 0, 117 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 disk0 crw-r----- 1 root operator - 0, 122 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 disk1 crw-r----- 1 root operator - 0, 127 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 disk2 crw-r----- 1 root operator - 0, 132 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 disk3 crw-r----- 1 root operator - 0, 149 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 disk4 crw-r----- 1 root operator - 0, 154 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 disk5 crw-r----- 1 root operator - 0, 159 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 disk6 crw-r----- 1 root operator - 0, 164 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 disk7 crw-r----- 1 root operator - 0, 115 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 swap0 crw-r----- 1 root operator - 0, 120 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 swap1 crw-r----- 1 root operator - 0, 125 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 swap2 crw-r----- 1 root operator - 0, 130 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 swap3 crw-r----- 1 root operator - 0, 147 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 swap4 crw-r----- 1 root operator - 0, 152 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 swap5 crw-r----- 1 root operator - 0, 157 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 swap6 crw-r----- 1 root operator - 0, 162 Nov 17 08:03:12 2010 swap7 (yes, I know its time to update, I'm waiting on 8.2) $ uname -a FreeBSD x 8.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 #1 r203057: Wed Jan 27 06:42:10 UTC 2010 root@Z:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/X amd64 gpart show =3D> 34 142081981 mfid0 GPT (68G) 34 128 1 freebsd-boot (64K) 162 50331648 2 freebsd-swap (24G) 50331810 90177536 3 freebsd-zfs (43G) 140509346 1572669 - free - (768M) =3D> 34 142081981 mfid1 GPT (68G) 34 128 1 freebsd-boot (64K) 162 50331648 2 freebsd-swap (24G) 50331810 90177536 3 freebsd-zfs (43G) 140509346 1572669 - free - (768M) =3D> 34 142081981 mfid2 GPT (68G) 34 128 1 freebsd-boot (64K) 162 50331648 2 freebsd-swap (24G) 50331810 90177536 3 freebsd-zfs (43G) 140509346 1572669 - free - (768M) =3D> 34 142081981 mfid3 GPT (68G) 34 128 1 freebsd-boot (64K) 162 50331648 2 freebsd-swap (24G) 50331810 90177536 3 freebsd-zfs (43G) 140509346 1572669 - free - (768M) =3D> 34 142081981 mfid4 GPT (68G) 34 128 1 freebsd-boot (64K) 162 50331648 2 freebsd-swap (24G) 50331810 90177536 3 freebsd-zfs (43G) 140509346 1572669 - free - (768M) =3D> 34 142081981 mfid5 GPT (68G) 34 128 1 freebsd-boot (64K) 162 50331648 2 freebsd-swap (24G) 50331810 90177536 3 freebsd-zfs (43G) 140509346 1572669 - free - (768M) =3D> 34 142081981 mfid6 GPT (68G) 34 128 1 freebsd-boot (64K) 162 50331648 2 freebsd-swap (24G) 50331810 90177536 3 freebsd-zfs (43G) 140509346 1572669 - free - (768M) =3D> 34 142081981 mfid7 GPT (68G) 34 128 1 freebsd-boot (64K) 162 50331648 2 freebsd-swap (24G) 50331810 90177536 3 freebsd-zfs (43G) 140509346 1572669 - free - (768M) $ pciconf -lv |grep .... mfi0@pci0:2:14:0: class=3D0x010400 card=3D0x1f031028 chip=3D0x00151= 028 rev=3D0x00 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'Dell Computer Corporation' device =3D 'Integrated RAID controller (PERC 5/i RAID Controller)= ' console/dmesg during hot swap: mfi0: sense error 0, sense_key 0, asc 0, ascq 0 mfid3: hard error cmd=3Dread fsbn 50331810 mfi0: 17960 (349585200s/0x0020/info) - Patrol Read started mfi0: 18038 (349586341s/0x0020/info) - Patrol Read complete mfi0: 18039 (349891840s/0x0002/WARN) - Removed: PD 03(e1/s3) mfi0: 18040 (349891840s/0x0002/info) - Removed: PD 03(e1/s3) Info: enclPd=3D08, scsiType=3D0, portMap=3D08, sasAddr=3D5000c50001439195,00000= 00000000000 mfi0: 18041 (349891840s/0x0002/info) - State change on PD 03(e1/s3) from UNCONFIGURED_BAD(1) to FAILED(11) mfi0: 18042 (349891840s/0x0002/info) - State change on PD 03(e1/s3) from FAILED(11) to UNCONFIGURED_BAD(1) mfi0: 18043 (349891857s/0x0002/info) - Inserted: PD 03(e1/s3) mfi0: 18044 (349891857s/0x0002/info) - Inserted: PD 03(e1/s3) Info: enclPd=3D08, scsiType=3D0, portMap=3D08, sasAddr=3D5000c5001ce0e065,00000= 00000000000 mfi0: 18045 (349891857s/0x0002/info) - State change on PD 03(e1/s3) from UNCONFIGURED_BAD(1) to UNCONFIGURED_GOOD(0) --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Sr. System Admin, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. --------------enig513E1A527410FB36D4033F9F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFNSMh4dbiP+9ubjBwRAhwwAJwOPiL7q29sKr3E0PxVMavBC723VgCdHWJ2 uy71SUlrnLXWLP9xxUYOhD4= =wLdP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig513E1A527410FB36D4033F9F-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 03:56:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1FFC1065672 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 03:56:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jarrod.sl@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7908FC12 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 03:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so7857840fxm.13 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:56:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=M12o0BkvYB9lwkT4IyT6TaM6N4NdBn0Y80ql+hnU+kQ=; b=doEpNLAgJ1CNjwms3w+9aqzogI4E33vYjFOnSve6Pd8R07Zyi0r+BwUGcVPbOadBv8 9J6Iotv6BNTFcqY/QERPxnjvJq4Eoxscbk7fdp+K0N2v1iuxUaR0V+pFP4L6yh9Gz7DM biNhxn0eOCkwOzd6gi1La3lMfw/OWYpbPoY5Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=wq3CS2uc9zVSm5/Z1NkHOn99JS6ZWwcB+rJfDayt6yF7OQhbGwJo1Wk3Tc8f0XeKlF Rh/N25bAJH+1EGDFUXo5hGLHkC+LYpLit906kFtpB/zVRaCr5Jg0BBlyUQDeSxT5H794 4xcU8Guth/+GPPvgITbKq5Wpk+FeDU/4wksX0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.93.144 with SMTP id v16mr7500812fam.35.1296618995358; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:56:35 -0800 (PST) Sender: jarrod.sl@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.2.206 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 19:56:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:56:35 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: TuG0CVFe9WU_xNEfdp98nQWjZpU Message-ID: From: Jarrod Slick To: 839273@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 03:56:38 -0000 Calling qmail more secure is pretty much just echoing conjecture at this point. Sure, it was designed to be secure (years and years ago) and the original author even held a contest with a monetary reward for anyone who could find a vulnerability -- that said, AFAIK that person no longer maintains the project. It requires lots of third party patches to be as functional as postfix, so to what extent these patches counteract the original coder's (apparent) secure coding practices is open to debate. If you know of any specific problems with postfix that would substantiate your claim I encourage you to inform the project's maintainers. From personal experience I can say that I've run a postfix config for years without problems. Also, in most networks I don't think the MTA is a very prominent attack vector; people are probably much more likely to get in through that old wordpress installation you've been meaning to upgrade for 6 months (for instance). On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Andres Perera wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Alessandro Baggi > wrote: > > Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix? > > qmail is more secure... but the design is just as alien to unix as sendmail > is > > for example, the fact that qmail uses custom libc, or at least did so on > the > version i tried. that turns off certain maintainers, and it would put me > off > aswell > > postfix on the other hand is more in tune with the rest of the system > > > > > thanks in advance > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 04:37:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E111065679 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 04:37:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 839273@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38E68FC25 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 04:37:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk8 with SMTP id 8so3002516gxk.13 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:37:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pMCVbb6buasac/hQgQ3MVlhYkvwcPWAttZiozUpwPcM=; b=n1uEtqBI/uxoylW8YslXAZNJVIX4b2evaMInz7lYy+ozG+ANvLukSIV+6IfeWxCPaQ QjbMvrJ0ZbC0qBUXgoXPbamyinhhKLmnKVEka7UOI8lSI2dZHIpKQ6dmnBwJzgT7ddEI bTh3RRyG6/AAVqxrAn7DOdBbrL+bwVCKAvsWg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=R9itc5de6WRwF9W/PjK12CxS+TU8de3zMypsLH1ESmrEYSyMoO+YNvbCeQXXurAMM+ Kpv7yGO1z+15JCd9Rt6GRz5zD/mUpF3YTzOItqIA3ZnAD3XKrJZ4qX5Ac4xr9NeWMV7c dwmC+vUDM3lWO0m08ghRZgQEQIWjb/O9+/bjc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.12.13 with SMTP id 13mr10628911ybl.59.1296621435023; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:37:15 -0800 (PST) Sender: 839273@gmail.com Received: by 10.151.110.10 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:37:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 00:07:14 -0430 X-Google-Sender-Auth: i4Yx56XoPv3sKTlXuymVTp_MwII Message-ID: From: Andres Perera To: Jarrod Slick Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: 839273@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 04:37:16 -0000 On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Jarrod Slick wr= ote: > Calling qmail more secure is pretty much just echoing conjecture at this > point. =C2=A0Sure, it was designed to be secure (years and years ago) and= the > original author even held a contest with a monetary reward for anyone who > could find a vulnerability -- that said, AFAIK that person no longer > maintains the project. =C2=A0It requires lots of third party patches to b= e as > functional as postfix, so to what extent these patches counteract the > original coder's (apparent) secure coding practices is open to debate. that would be besides the point. having the ability to patch up freebsd doe= sn't grant me the authority of claiming that my work is the official version, or atleast doesn't guarantee that i'll have an audience for my claim > If you know of any specific problems with postfix that would substantiate > your claim I encourage you to inform the project's maintainers. =C2=A0Fro= m > personal experience I can say that I've run a postfix config for years > without problems. =C2=A0Also, in most networks I don't think the MTA is a= very > prominent attack vector; people are probably much more likely to get in > through that old wordpress installation you've been meaning to upgrade fo= r 6 > months (for instance). you seem to be confused by what i posted i don't have an explicit example (e.g., buffer overflow) to show that qmail= is more secure. it has to do with the design principles of each and how the sy= stem is layed out. while it's true that postfix is partitioned, qmail goes a lit= tle further than that by taking a big dump on libc that's not to say that postfix is inherently insecure From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 04:52:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 360F51065670 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 04:52:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43D18FC08 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 04:52:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so7567592wwf.31 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:52:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=eFIi/dVPZvuR1syHHjC/Bw8Aame3XiJbmUeBVtsi0lQ=; b=DPQnS0EKMtepi42GRdByIP4fUhk2PAmHqvA3aLKDz/KqAJTFwwPxufrdFHk2PUOddb +/arhPQESNK0pU0vqjquUWFLfMAqJIUVzN871HFXMBB5E6pzAO5+yxCm6LxxYfvdPRA3 qT04jp1rP9wa4BDIRDwSf0NWXvugld2TvQrlM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=i8jeVm71YvwI2NrqTftNfK+2dDQdFLSLB3yyBiR/NdxkR+TH+252Pz/+0aTwDzPTRd YKRSIAp/PZP5ntNav3/4oLqjDZRoo3fhX3pFR0D7m4F6Ezy3Pl/y2I6eXue5d9Ijhv7V uKLh38DhKzrMFEwmk3emAswZPTCRCQnnrCVqs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.11.205 with SMTP id 55mr1380639wex.72.1296622352527; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:52:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.0.8 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:52:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 04:52:32 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: 4k drives and zfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 04:52:34 -0000 Hi All, A quick question. Im upgrading my filer at home to have 2x 2tb samsung F4EG drives. I believe these are 4k drives. I'm intending to use the gnop trick to get zfs ashift to 12. Will this make my pool unbootable. I have read a few threads aluding to this. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 04:56:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A771065673 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 04:56:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from neshort@yahoo.com) Received: from web161611.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (web161611.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.211.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C37468FC08 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 04:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10656 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Feb 2011 04:56:28 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1296622588; bh=PT9JVssriNOea5aJb0WeCDx8ibpuWrLx3+5wjcOZX5g=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=EVJdrD5xv7PF0cTtyu+Id+qJDMGL0Yn2chwFFyV9ubz08VdlAcko1GZoT9fu7W3pNkLV8kZn/vq59UewvH3P561mmjA5Rh19MkCAfOTNMZjjDAhc9wFMLuAQqsdo5N0V1sT0wDqsO0Knu1uQuMl0ZWe4TULH4R7008ocaL6K8Eo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CuXi3ABaLZh5pXjDoaK+VmicjKHau61gPO0iWz/rIy4KqL+laoilTULKpzxSuQpexzyT1nsu4OaOGsAUM+akWn16anGrXXMU2w1Xx43j6G60wQ7jqB33m+bmIqy5ncK+Bo5hurmSKvvWINDsIr5ryDxsZc5HfmqyGpTTjl7PBBE=; Message-ID: <120019.9166.qm@web161611.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: OomrQW0VM1m0iFsP92ZsC6S3FqrglyW28euNSmVatkKgVkx JOSWucGhNFQRUYdkCO_cj.wdzqWWhAZj2m.qxHXLOrflScsKyTVwvyfOjVdK wdkDYa1mpjKWkRzOcsrbD8dGW1RoySTwpdtDKGIk601xQT42H4x8a.TR8.cS 89grE03E_vsTN5Sk82HGK3TsSpLis26selLRHq9WWY6daxqhbvcQsoMQY0uV Rodl.orA8NVASyY0rY2bNh39W9eP7EsfY7P14qY6Z8KzaR_7JzTxzKMAoajw azf_cqw-- Received: from [174.18.250.109] by web161611.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:56:28 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:56:28 -0800 (PST) From: Neil Short To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: AHCI dvd woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 04:56:29 -0000 old problem on HP laptops. the workaround has been to go to the BIOS and switch from AHCI to IDE interface; but my BIOS doesn't support switching. is anybody working on this? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 05:36:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03298106566B for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 05:36:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfarmer@predatorlabs.net) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8B68FC08 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 05:36:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so7374070qwj.13 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 21:36:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=predatorlabs.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cwg2sjIGHQ6XkKYEIbbmEZFe4Ez8pZfCmo16abBEtN8=; b=c0dVpnp87wXvHZ3xQpTcAbCj0/y3YOBEDs8kUIUW2mTltAdqPqPWXXBNKMxBhKBcZB W6IgWNPc/N8/6FGVXQD7Graz5hpsBGIHYC0gm/VSuUiuQ/0gL+yYm+5ONojCr3S0/sG1 dRsTsP9PV9nxtvps2qFMuGPXKm2s0QAmopr64= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=predatorlabs.net; s=google; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=HeFNqg4AZkPFoPPNB03gRq8ok7a6aaYIgasRdJAc285WDt7UJmVgZSBj9iuvWQ8xrw sklTlDRvlJoet1MkTGbb67bgBWDaO15h9qrgubx3kp76Zu7EPaBOZLYg/pE/u+jnNBe/ FJMsRdxhV9zV9OnAWVE/dhmeEApdgd7YD2AG8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.98.135 with SMTP id q7mr7885525qcn.270.1296624959621; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 21:35:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.198.138 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:35:59 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [128.95.133.118] In-Reply-To: <4D48BEC7.4030705@comcast.net> References: <4D48BEC7.4030705@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:35:59 -0800 Message-ID: From: Rob Farmer To: Rem P Roberti Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Opening Opera as user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:36:01 -0000 On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote: > I installed linux-opera, and I guess I made a mistake by opening it the > first time as root, when I should have opened as user. =A0At any rate, I = can > now only open the browser as root, and when I do I get this message: > > opera: $HOME set to /root. Use -personaldir if you do not want to use > /root/.opera/ > > Can someone give me a heads up on how to fix this, as the above message i= s a > mystery to me. > Most likely, it is trying to use /root/.opera for your profile and is crashing early in the startup because the regular user can't write there. I would save any bookmarks or other useful items and then delete the folder. I haven't run into this in FreeBSD but you can get similar problems in Windows if a global profile is created in C:\Program Files\Opera by an administrator. --=20 Rob Farmer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 05:47:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1DF106564A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 05:47:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089C38FC14 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 05:47:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta24.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.76]) by qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2tk01g0021ei1Bg56tnFKm; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:47:15 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta24.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2tnC1g00F46zqiB3ktnE5h; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:47:15 +0000 Message-ID: <4D48EFDF.90109@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 21:47:11 -0800 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110131 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rob Farmer References: <4D48BEC7.4030705@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Opening Opera as user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:47:15 -0000 > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote: >> I installed linux-opera, and I guess I made a mistake by opening it the >> first time as root, when I should have opened as user. At any rate, I can >> now only open the browser as root, and when I do I get this message: >> >> opera: $HOME set to /root. Use -personaldir if you do not want to use >> /root/.opera/ >> >> Can someone give me a heads up on how to fix this, as the above message is a >> mystery to me. >> > Most likely, it is trying to use /root/.opera for your profile and is > crashing early in the startup because the regular user can't write > there. I would save any bookmarks or other useful items and then > delete the folder. I haven't run into this in FreeBSD but you can get > similar problems in Windows if a global profile is created in > C:\Program Files\Opera by an administrator. > That's interesting. The problem is that there is no /root/.opera folder. As a matter of fact there doesn't seem to be any folders at all that refer to the linux-opera browser, in my /home/user directory, or anywhere else. So I have no idea where the program is storing the profile info. Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 06:00:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588F5106566B for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 06:00:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfarmer@predatorlabs.net) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F050D8FC13 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 06:00:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so4885420qyk.13 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:00:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=predatorlabs.net; s=google; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0Sf3kVbVnwQlf6CIJ0hSnigHA4f7yIig0AU7fIETzGY=; b=SEVrPtHfU2F9dNQGy0lXgxBvF+vaDdlv1RskoaURctyzBKm2CxbgqkZii21J3gbHAX BHf1Z1RkIojGqOxmMZNiuZzvArxmhAHT4/U/ZiOKiXnqhtAkP9rSJz5SPgFpImnZPDg6 9YCwVZ9p8daUU5xIkO9g8oWHOgk6VqqxonyT0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=predatorlabs.net; s=google; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=G0uZl32AvtWtqeaxJYrfetXjzrSAzY39MH1/qrz6oteiw9x826AX4fd/qfgVjnbQIt Cxy+4yFx41D3riEDwKCxdGQ0NJhxBzxD2MC8sc9kTh5Qf6uVgh5eTVSje5TB489R3iIK yX5Ti6OpqWNdzuCF1WDNz0m7t+yTSwoFpM1qs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.80.143 with SMTP id t15mr8450206qak.41.1296626407882; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:00:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.198.138 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 22:00:07 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [128.95.133.118] In-Reply-To: <4D48EFDF.90109@comcast.net> References: <4D48BEC7.4030705@comcast.net> <4D48EFDF.90109@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 22:00:07 -0800 Message-ID: From: Rob Farmer To: Rem P Roberti Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Opening Opera as user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:00:09 -0000 On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Rem P Roberti wrote: > That's interesting. =A0The problem is that there is no /root/.opera folde= r. > =A0As a matter of fact there doesn't seem to be any folders at all that r= efer > to the linux-opera browser, in my /home/user directory, or anywhere else. > =A0So I have no idea where the program is storing the profile info. > > Rem > I think /usr/local/bin/opera is a shell script that sets a couple environment variables and starts the real binary, so maybe you could open it and see if there are any clues. Otherwise, I have no other idea. Sorry :( --=20 Rob Farmer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 06:16:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51747106564A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 06:16:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from armin@frozen-zone.org) Received: from mailbackup.inode.at (mailbackup.inode.at [213.229.60.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1648FC15 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 06:16:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [62.99.145.2] (port=9920 helo=mx.inode.at) by mailbackup.inode.at with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PkVif-0001hY-Ht for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:57:33 +0100 Received: from [84.119.22.236] (port=9037 helo=fz-sub1.local) by smartmx-02.inode.at with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkVic-0000Mx-4m; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:57:30 +0100 Message-ID: <4D48F247.4000007@frozen-zone.org> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:57:27 +0100 From: Armin Pirkovitsch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101212 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rem P Roberti References: <4D48BEC7.4030705@comcast.net> <4D48EFDF.90109@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <4D48EFDF.90109@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Opening Opera as user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:16:40 -0000 Could you post your environment variables? btw. how do you login / start x? (eg login in the console and use startx, or using any login manager like xdm, kdm, gdm, slim...) Armin On 02/02/11 06:47, Rem P Roberti wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Rem P Roberti >> wrote: >>> I installed linux-opera, and I guess I made a mistake by opening it the >>> first time as root, when I should have opened as user. At any rate, I >>> can >>> now only open the browser as root, and when I do I get this message: >>> >>> opera: $HOME set to /root. Use -personaldir if you do not want to use >>> /root/.opera/ >>> >>> Can someone give me a heads up on how to fix this, as the above >>> message is a >>> mystery to me. >>> >> Most likely, it is trying to use /root/.opera for your profile and is >> crashing early in the startup because the regular user can't write >> there. I would save any bookmarks or other useful items and then >> delete the folder. I haven't run into this in FreeBSD but you can get >> similar problems in Windows if a global profile is created in >> C:\Program Files\Opera by an administrator. >> > > That's interesting. The problem is that there is no /root/.opera folder. > As a matter of fact there doesn't seem to be any folders at all that > refer to the linux-opera browser, in my /home/user directory, or > anywhere else. So I have no idea where the program is storing the > profile info. > > Rem > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 06:27:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B033106564A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 06:27:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6C78FC08 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 06:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.92]) by qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2u9i1g0031zF43QA8uEilA; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:14:42 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2uEh1g00B46zqiB8kuEhcn; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:14:42 +0000 Message-ID: <4D48F650.3060205@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:14:40 -0800 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110131 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Armin Pirkovitsch References: <4D48BEC7.4030705@comcast.net> <4D48EFDF.90109@comcast.net> <4D48F247.4000007@frozen-zone.org> In-Reply-To: <4D48F247.4000007@frozen-zone.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Opening Opera as user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:27:53 -0000 > Could you post your environment variables? > > btw. how do you login / start x? (eg login in the console and use > startx, or using any login manager like xdm, kdm, gdm, slim...) > > Armin > >> >>> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Rem P Roberti >>> wrote: >>>> I installed linux-opera, and I guess I made a mistake by opening it >>>> the >>>> first time as root, when I should have opened as user. At any rate, I >>>> can >>>> now only open the browser as root, and when I do I get this message: >>>> >>>> opera: $HOME set to /root. Use -personaldir if you do not want to use >>>> /root/.opera/ >>>> >>>> Can someone give me a heads up on how to fix this, as the above >>>> message is a >>>> mystery to me. >>>> >>> Most likely, it is trying to use /root/.opera for your profile and is >>> crashing early in the startup because the regular user can't write >>> there. I would save any bookmarks or other useful items and then >>> delete the folder. I haven't run into this in FreeBSD but you can get >>> similar problems in Windows if a global profile is created in >>> C:\Program Files\Opera by an administrator. >>> >> >> That's interesting. The problem is that there is no /root/.opera folder. >> As a matter of fact there doesn't seem to be any folders at all that >> refer to the linux-opera browser, in my /home/user directory, or >> anywhere else. So I have no idea where the program is storing the >> profile info. >> >> Rem I log in directly from the console using 'startx'. And I hate to sound really ignorant, but I'm still pretty much a newbie and not sure where the environment variables are found. Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 06:37:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A6C106566B for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 06:37:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9AFF8FC17 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 06:37:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so7958910fxm.13 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:37:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=C9CnCNTG7sAsLGkkZyDgUW9SUNzY7UGt+1dU9S4WkY8=; b=IK5fVg+sbV823gCPeYEnF+/T0CUrVDfHU0r3MPKFUglVPlw/P/GSmuqy68l0SMdb/s d8hTc/CajHL3BzhMTl9t7QwcmgJWaaFYLudjO3G090lGpDnfHo1vZyBuqkr3W0MOIFee B0DW5U7KXMfvvm5xaA5XWbqNCR8jT2L3en3JY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=uwkDUwRa57QiSUzyHAxRkNh9hjkNhCMUTn6MIcD0jNqoVWZtrSgCIva+sP2//BLjzJ i9E4pKqa2WnnEd2ZvRXltHMeTAwMzIaHEpxHy9pqv9n0hGeLkW0hRgTnHRs+pBsk0/EL 8De/fkaW86LFcnfoAvaZWnQUxIldN2zpBNSYE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.85.204 with SMTP id p12mr8329619fal.146.1296628658809; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:37:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.114.4 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 22:37:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D48F650.3060205@comcast.net> References: <4D48BEC7.4030705@comcast.net> <4D48EFDF.90109@comcast.net> <4D48F247.4000007@frozen-zone.org> <4D48F650.3060205@comcast.net> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 00:37:38 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Rem P Roberti Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Armin Pirkovitsch , FreeBSD Subject: Re: Opening Opera as user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:37:40 -0000 On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Rem P Roberti wrote: > I log in directly from the console using 'startx'. And I hate to sound > really ignorant, but I'm still pretty much a newbie and not sure where the > environment variables are found. You should be doing this step as your normal user, not root if that is what you are doing. Otherwise whatever you run from X with start as root. If you see a '#' at the end of your prompt, it's a root prompt. You may find it easier to follow the handbook's guide on desktop environments using the auto startup methods. Some of the DE prevent you from logging in as root so you wouldn't have been able to run into this issue. If you do plan on using this as a desktop system, a desktop environment can make things easier anyway. You can always drop down to a console if needed but most of the time it's a lot more convient to use the DE's terminal or konsole or whatever. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 06:47:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8726106564A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 06:47:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.59.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0048FC0A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 06:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.12]) by qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2umy1g0010Fqzac5FunHlg; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:47:17 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2unF1g00B46zqiB3UunGov; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:47:17 +0000 Message-ID: <4D48FDF1.5040504@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:47:13 -0800 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110131 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More References: <4D48BEC7.4030705@comcast.net> <4D48EFDF.90109@comcast.net> <4D48F247.4000007@frozen-zone.org> <4D48F650.3060205@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Armin Pirkovitsch , FreeBSD Subject: Re: Opening Opera as user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:47:17 -0000 > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Rem P Roberti > wrote: > > I log in directly from the console using 'startx'. And I hate to > sound really ignorant, but I'm still pretty much a newbie and not > sure where the environment variables are found. > > > You should be doing this step as your normal user, not root if that is > what you are doing. Otherwise whatever you run from X with start as > root. If you see a '#' at the end of your prompt, it's a root > prompt. You may find it easier to follow the handbook's guide on > desktop environments using the auto startup methods. Some of the DE > prevent you from logging in as root so you wouldn't have been able to > run into this issue. If you do plan on using this as a desktop > system, a desktop environment can make things easier anyway. You can > always drop down to a console if needed but most of the time it's a > lot more convient to use the DE's terminal or konsole or whatever. > I always start x as user. I learned early on not to make the mistake of starting X as root. I use Fluxbox with X, and had a terminal window open there with root invoked for that window. That's when I first tried to open linux-opera. Naturally, it opened fine, but will not open if I try to do the same thing from a terminal window as user. I would like to set up Opera to open from the Fluxbox menu, but in order for that to happen the program needs to be opened as user, which is just what I can't do. Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 06:52:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBE6106566B for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 06:52:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6808FC08 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 06:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so7966754fxm.13 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:52:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=yVlLAmGYHX3+3qgqbkQY7hAJsjVGjjzo1osBjgMGWdo=; b=qeTS/btXTKsV6wuMj2YpR/66Vfv/Xl/lUaxzzvnucRRsq8015DnDEppFB0Gj58dmkd sDsyaarpYZ8EIS6q/EezTn2wkbD6sgNzpdK8C9DGti3Gb2IrUue5GLZOn54W4iTRlH33 iiEiaxb2pRDACCAo4yt6scvjT9f5r+zYuX8+g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=eEcFe114e+u1Iywzg/JPYGy5+DdSvYzVAXpR8XAp9jHoHtcPWEfXyqpAByc8r8jx0z 9WkGv1N1jyp4DmK992EGPesAQC+0TtVrKIm3cyai9V8NUgvSP1UHtmU0ngjFXzVuu8tQ o158Hg7MzWCb1CbYRflD0mdTxeUq8evpOT5B0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.95.202 with SMTP id e10mr791871fan.32.1296629520533; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:52:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.114.4 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 22:52:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D48FDF1.5040504@comcast.net> References: <4D48BEC7.4030705@comcast.net> <4D48EFDF.90109@comcast.net> <4D48F247.4000007@frozen-zone.org> <4D48F650.3060205@comcast.net> <4D48FDF1.5040504@comcast.net> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 00:52:00 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Rem P Roberti Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Armin Pirkovitsch , FreeBSD Subject: Re: Opening Opera as user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:52:02 -0000 On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Rem P Roberti wrote: > I always start x as user. I learned early on not to make the mistake of > starting X as root. I use Fluxbox with X, and had a terminal window open > there with root invoked for that window. That's when I first tried to open > linux-opera. Naturally, it opened fine, but will not open if I try to do > the same thing from a terminal window as user. I would like to set up Opera > to open from the Fluxbox menu, but in order for that to happen the program > needs to be opened as user, which is just what I can't do. > I'm not an opera user so maybe there's a reason I'm not aware of, but why are you using linux-opera and not the native version? You can try to run it under truss(1) to see if that gives any clues as where it's failing. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 07:22:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7A4106566B for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:22:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C6B8FC13 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:22:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.71]) by qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2vM81g0011Y3wxoA1vNXh8; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:22:31 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2vNV1g00P46zqiB8bvNWhu; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:22:31 +0000 Message-ID: <4D490635.8090601@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 23:22:29 -0800 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110131 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More References: <4D48BEC7.4030705@comcast.net> <4D48EFDF.90109@comcast.net> <4D48F247.4000007@frozen-zone.org> <4D48F650.3060205@comcast.net> <4D48FDF1.5040504@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Armin Pirkovitsch , FreeBSD Subject: Re: Opening Opera as user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:22:32 -0000 > > I always start x as user. I learned early on not to make the > mistake of starting X as root. I use Fluxbox with X, and had a > terminal window open there with root invoked for that window. > That's when I first tried to open linux-opera. Naturally, it > opened fine, but will not open if I try to do the same thing from > a terminal window as user. I would like to set up Opera to open > from the Fluxbox menu, but in order for that to happen the program > needs to be opened as user, which is just what I can't do. > > > I'm not an opera user so maybe there's a reason I'm not aware of, but > why are you using linux-opera and not the native version? > > You can try to run it under truss(1) to see if that gives any clues as > where it's failing. > The reason that I installed linux-opera, as opposed to the native version, is that all of the linux plugins seem to work quite well with this version. Flash, for example, works beautifully, which is something that I have never had success using with any other browser and FreeBSD. Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 09:05:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7EF11065672; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:05:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64598FC13; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:05:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1PkYPT-0006q2-8w>; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:49:55 +0100 Received: from telesto.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.198]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1PkYPT-0006Mh-6J>; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:49:55 +0100 Message-ID: <4D491AB4.7090700@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:49:56 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" Organization: Freie =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Universit=E4t_Berlin?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101210 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.198 Cc: Subject: editors/openoffice-org-3.3.0: serious issue with X11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:05:16 -0000 Hello. I just upgraded openoffice-3.2.1 to openoffice-org-3.3.0 and found myself in a serious issue. Opening openoffice works only sporadically, in most cases I get the error: XDM authorization key matches an existing client!/usr/local/openoffice.org-3.3.0/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin X11 error: Can't open display: Set DISPLAY environment variable, use -display option or check permissions of your X-Server (See "man X" resp. "man xhost" for details) Deleting .Xauthority or restarting the session via resetting xdm/Xorg or removing ~/.openoffice didn't help anyway. Any suggestions are appreciated. Thanks in advance, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 09:25:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0352E106564A; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:25:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swell.k@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62DD28FC1A; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyf6 with SMTP id 6so3790408eyf.13 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 01:25:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=70228rVqWiy7oG8GClkipCO5mmYh5sxasPn6uSf62Bo=; b=l7qdk4H4yqLOVvZSI7Zy7rDU8Uke0+ZiAZ/T5TkjMpPodfXpA2dujxLNvwgmjpVfJn ONcwqysQVuWWFHIa0OhPCcy1LrzbX2/ri/ubUNLyAlJc/3flEaO9tmJpUWYruRF/6NYQ JQ3k6lJor/qEcyvoaurwuHid5MVUNEeKTTRmk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=j/7LQAfDR1HMscQ/3PqwGmUXyDevQQOKRy68lEoqsMcCEbGECr7ZEjKfW5SnS0RViU FS/5ZVheVzfSIsUs1GiGw0prw4S1tQguDFcr2UGHO8KSnnDgl78TBML87DTxvQy/RU28 lVRvEF+fuAzcUmVNStYUrJTZDxaeVuEfbLUis= Received: by 10.213.28.141 with SMTP id m13mr94186ebc.50.1296638732144; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 01:25:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (tor-exit-readme.hands.com [83.142.228.14]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t50sm18031151eeh.0.2011.02.02.01.25.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 02 Feb 2011 01:25:31 -0800 (PST) From: Anonymous To: "O. Hartmann" References: <4D491AB4.7090700@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:25:08 +0300 In-Reply-To: <4D491AB4.7090700@zedat.fu-berlin.de> (O. Hartmann's message of "Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:49:56 +0100") Message-ID: <8662t2okjv.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: editors/openoffice-org-3.3.0: serious issue with X11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:25:34 -0000 "O. Hartmann" writes: > Hello. > I just upgraded openoffice-3.2.1 to openoffice-org-3.3.0 and found > myself in a serious issue. Opening openoffice works only sporadically, > in most cases I get the error: > > XDM authorization key matches an existing > client!/usr/local/openoffice.org-3.3.0/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin > X11 error: Can't open display: > Set DISPLAY environment variable, use -display option > or check permissions of your X-Server > (See "man X" resp. "man xhost" for details) Have you tried to add the following to xdm-config DisplayManager*authName: MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 or adjusting permissions using xhost(1)? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 10:49:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3765106570B for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:49:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779FD8FC0A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so8004005wyf.13 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 02:49:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=J5w/QA5fbNhq+8m1aS8QLLGLAzHTbxwgCUl7JGL3pEQ=; b=F2M+xGMgzzThtNKbXSjDM92+QxvipjQb1/v27RWGOy/Bw8iBB6GPezXNl/pEPqvAgO 7Y1m5IEvhbu8SSl3jRGuap1h7UBaMu3/F4UxdYrECkGIHDaIzvzZZj4cW30QKJf26AQC JXtZyNHDChqrdptpn1y7XoZG2xVNCqkut0nQ0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dYLm8RcKDLDkiUkc2k82HrGiTRpGcPVxPXG7xg3F05nGhLutJsdKDczO8VSiKIxzYV KkjcFHg89bppZmE3Kw6brHoOR7qO89xOOb9a1530DjZSEr1Htvz2s3v67Jo4UQwvH09p wBeDipq+fSXE9TXw7IA4UPQVtgIWvhG8Nho2Y= Received: by 10.216.145.135 with SMTP id p7mr752733wej.38.1296643771269; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 02:49:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m6sm12039105wej.10.2011.02.02.02.49.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 02 Feb 2011 02:49:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:49:26 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110202104926.2c2a0f2f@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <4D48BEC7.4030705@comcast.net> References: <4D48BEC7.4030705@comcast.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Opening Opera as user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 10:49:33 -0000 On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:17:43 -0800 Rem P Roberti wrote: > I installed linux-opera, and I guess I made a mistake by opening it > the first time as root, when I should have opened as user. At any > rate, I can now only open the browser as root, and when I do I get > this message: > > opera: $HOME set to /root. Use -personaldir if you do not want to use > /root/.opera/ > Don't focus on this because you shouldn't be running it as root at all. What actually happens when you try to run it as an normal user? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 11:12:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B819106566B for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:12:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from red.stonehenge.com (red.stonehenge.com [IPv6:2607:f2f8:3080::]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148688FC12 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by red.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D08AD229B; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 03:12:36 -0800 (PST) From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: Jarrod Slick References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.18.1.12; tzolkin = 5 Eb; haab = 5 Pax Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 03:12:36 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Jarrod Slick's message of "Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:56:35 -0700") Message-ID: <86r5bqy9jv.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, 839273@gmail.com Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:12:37 -0000 >>>>> "Jarrod" == Jarrod Slick writes: Jarrod> If you know of any specific problems with postfix that would Jarrod> substantiate your claim I encourage you to inform the project's Jarrod> maintainers. In fact, given the legacy of other security tools created by the author of Postfix (Wietse Venema) (SATAN, TCP Wrappers, Coroner's Toolkit), I'd say that postfix was *also* designed from the start as a secure MTA. It certainly looks that way. I've met Wietse in person... he's an upstanding guy. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 11:27:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DABDF1065672 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:27:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vhost0033404@web03.nl05.pcextreme.nl) Received: from se09.mail.pcextreme.nl (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:101:22c3::9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913A78FC23 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:27:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vhosting-relay.mail.pcextreme.nl ([85.92.129.251]) by se09.mail.pcextreme.nl with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pkas9-0002c9-Kk for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:27:43 +0100 Received: from web03.nl05.pcextreme.nl (unknown [10.0.5.62]) by vhosting-relay.mail.pcextreme.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10EED102D1 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:27:32 +0100 (CET) Received: by web03.nl05.pcextreme.nl (Postfix, from userid 38404) id 0EDF844A00C; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:27:32 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Order Department MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20110202112732.0EDF844A00C@web03.nl05.pcextreme.nl> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:27:32 +0100 (CET) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Warning: web03.nl05.pcextreme.nl has no MX records X-Filter-ID: XtLePq6GTMn8G68F0EmQvTbVZtIjUkb5NuUG88DCUVDkfrUbc76B96E4u45xNjWlvQl4/iLHDUqh Rzu9BMWf1/djzQ6YC7Heg3Xf7O1TOd5cCqj0jJG5N7TvCoLLlBm+GWcJxOZxfho2OMfTsvH7l3dy ngrddynzbKMUN01mJdT/ejmpy7akzCaofoycQKHngE5UXd46N4SWVaOroji1U4gifFDW9AARsCeO 4OUmpOFm4zuNRcgRKiGg7nXFaZTx9ZLvppnKerAAyv0wyEnvGuuT6WOvnKa28/3CAG2Fd3ckiHVH TWUw6avHFtix1LegimIH6wVBgcE5j4/jQ8L8fUQGwGuWeh5hUtFY8OXoJniMf7teyhU7h6PQfzfq 9JwxcYCtB6ETXyLfzLzoD5jbaS4c6jGH4B+v+gACTlJyh2ZDsCSDVwh36Cp1rAV3eDkos6atvRHW szzmk8HXeZJmbpQImSQlyoK+Nq0qt+6+DsHzN6xuX11FBkFaiV7r52q9u3XM+7mPIjlzVF0XL2gi R9mQO8IQpwhqmEbPgTTfBEc= X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Class: ham; X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Score: 0.00113838031332 X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Evidence: 'ole': 0.50; 'direct': 0.50; 'spambayes.global_tokens': 0.22; 'pyzor': 0.50; 'sa': 0.00; 'os': 0.43; 'dkim': 0.50; 'dnsbl': 0.01; 'sender': 0.50 X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Thermostat: ----- X-Originating-IP: 85.92.129.251 Subject: Mail Order. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: sale_manigalerie_inc@yahoo.es List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:27:44 -0000 Pleasant Day to you, I want to place an Art order in your store,and I will like to know if yo= u ship to ESPANA (Spain) and my method of payment will be credit card. So= please let me know if you can assist me with the order before ending of = these month,and please do not forget to include your web page in your rep= lying back to my mail. I will await your prompt response as soon as you receive this mail,I will= be very glad if you treat this email with good concern. Warmest Regards. Order Department. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 11:29:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B0C106564A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:29:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC4F8FC0A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:29:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so7587075qyk.13 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 03:29:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.184.7 with SMTP id ci7mr6305483qcb.241.1296646190012; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 03:29:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.102.19 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 03:29:49 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [93.221.172.50] In-Reply-To: <4D4870A8.3060706@ifdnrg.com> References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> <20110201102301.2ae55810@scorpio> <201102011326580606.004CE418@sentry.24cl.com> <861v3rzgcs.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <4D4870A8.3060706@ifdnrg.com> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:29:49 +0100 Message-ID: From: "C. P. Ghost" To: Paul Macdonald Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:29:52 -0000 On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Paul Macdonald wrote: > On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: >> >> No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix, and >> pretty darn good at m4. =A0Or is that m4()dnl()? :) >> >> But I've never found postfix without a knob to do something I want it to >> do, and most of the knobs are set properly right out of the box. (And >> reasonably named too!) >> > so for us folks still using sendmail (which works fine for me) > > what benefits do we get with postfix that'd outweigh the hassles of > changing? sendmail's support of a UUCP backend maybe? But apparently, it's possible to do that in postfix too[1] so I don't really know of any compelling reason to stick to sendmail, except for being accustomed to configuring and managing it, which is a purely subjective matter. [1]: http://www.postfix.org/UUCP_README.html -cpghost. --=20 Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 12:18:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07681065672 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:18:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895C18FC14 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:18:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkbfG-0007kC-Ht for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:18:26 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:18:26 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:18:26 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:18:09 +0100 Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: Re: 4k drives and zfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:18:41 -0000 On 02/02/2011 05:52, krad wrote: > Hi All, > > A quick question. Im upgrading my filer at home to have 2x 2tb samsung > F4EG drives. I believe these are 4k drives. I'm intending to use the > gnop trick to get zfs ashift to 12. Will this make my pool unbootable. > I have read a few threads aluding to this. There have been bugs which make such drives unbootable but they have been fixed at least in CURRENT (I haven't tried it). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 12:38:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F80106566C for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:38:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@cpcnw.co.uk) Received: from relay.pcl-ipout01.plus.net (relay.pcl-ipout01.plus.net [212.159.7.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646378FC08 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:38:09 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgkGAO/XSE3Unw4U/2dsb2JhbACJZ40PgSaMfXO8KQ2FRgQ Received: from outmx08.plus.net ([212.159.14.20]) by relay.pcl-ipout01.plus.net with ESMTP; 02 Feb 2011 12:09:17 +0000 Received: from custompc.plus.com ([212.159.115.167] helo=admin) by outmx08.plus.net with smtp (Exim) id 1PkbWP-0002dU-5E for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:09:17 +0000 Message-ID: <8BB19CF584084C298AA7F3BD4F3AC385@admin> From: "Graham Bentley" To: References: <20110202120033.349E710657CC@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:09:11 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994 Subject: Starting from Scratch! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:38:10 -0000 After several months away from FreeBSD I am asking for advice on versions for general desktop / interest use [non critical learning platform] Should I hang on a bit for 8.2 to go current? Or will I easily be able to update RC3 in any case? Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 12:55:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D63106566C for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:55:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from egoitz@ramattack.net) Received: from webmail.ramattack.net (ks200575.kimsufi.com [91.121.111.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3318FC17 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.ramattack.net (webmail.ramattack.net [127.0.0.50]) by webmail.ramattack.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p128dEdD039030 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:39:14 GMT (envelope-from egoitz@ramattack.net) Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.ramattack.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p128dEFj039029; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:39:14 GMT (envelope-from egoitz@ramattack.net) X-Authentication-Warning: webmail.ramattack.net: www set sender to egoitz@ramattack.net using -f To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:39:14 +0100 From: egoitz@ramattack.net In-Reply-To: References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: egoitz@ramattack.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.5-beta Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:55:06 -0000 >> version i tried. that turns off certain maintainers, and it would >> put me >> off >> aswell >> >> postfix on the other hand is more in tune with the rest of the >> system >> >> > >> > thanks in advance >> > _______________________________________________ >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Nowadays I think Postfix is much more complete and efficient mail system than Qmail although this one it's a pretty small and good code by design mail system... but the problem is that you'll probably need more features than qmail-1.03 gave unless... so you will need to patch it, so you're entering non qmail native code... By my professional experience... Postfix will give you more "oportunities and features" for things going well... Some years ago I set up qmail servers and I like qmail and I like playing with it's code... but.... should say that nowadays unless IMHO... Postfix is basically the nowadays opensource mail system. Bye!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 13:03:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC25106566C for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:03:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F978FC1C for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:03:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so7728864iwn.13 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:03:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=QgiG5heDscqtS2rZMZUgVls/4ktbVgAWhcKvOybDqNE=; b=jDxXS5Urx/4zRGqq/THv2XLdvL++8tv2jAodSCYM/1o1h1oWxxB63XSGnsQeSmFXqI vVnfrGrn39dWz7SyhinruMo8E2gjcQQwXQF1CYABTStHB8NRqcQM+vg4AAmdrZTdKOpb cHPc7or15qAKptPRuTaMqecFv6Qqr7ZlR+gPI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=J4FBZcWC0q7hPzxejZj69nf3mRj/BzQvcQjX0ByAfbd2UkEjANcuByz7xqch0VuUjF BVvXSbj316IawLKzl6GiR3vULaNaNICAMOJGpC5lEUfIBPJp32tRzqhOn3lbinugwHLj QoLBl1tgegiqXwHspiJrarUaolENuF8wxunFo= Received: by 10.231.16.68 with SMTP id n4mr9992034iba.94.1296651804319; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:03:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from athena.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 34sm19815029ibi.8.2011.02.02.05.03.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:03:23 -0800 (PST) From: ajtiM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:03:32 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.5.5; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201102020703.33098.lumiwa@gmail.com> Subject: perl - update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:03:25 -0000 Hi! My system: FreeBSD 8.1 I like to update perl to higher version and I don't want to screw up... I red /usr/ports/UPDATING: "perl-after-upgrade" script supplied with lang/perl5.12 If I update to perl 5.12.3 is it enough that I run above script, please? In /etc/make.conf I have: # added by use.perl 2010-11-05 17:40:46 PERL_VERSION=5.8.9 I have above from version 8.0. Do I need to change version from 5.8.9 to 5.12 or to 5.12.3? Thank you very much. Mitja -------- http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 13:14:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7681065698 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:14:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00218FC27 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:14:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyf6 with SMTP id 6so3857236eyf.13 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:14:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fHrgDYp+gtQNKsQcnVUYVyZPooci5NgZq0Rbd/S2g2E=; b=sQkdYrH6cyYhxDIk4jvgAi/3XE4528AMHtiv2tE++EIuWwFnJXXhmSF0EbUFwp3JRi FF6UQiI4fPBo5dtOwMIqhE+gCP5EzHyZZa4MwfyzXxTkSeS+0sq4VrsdKSIsrvvpqVDt YMrqOzWJBNl+TQekLQw+8SZL/qmpdGJXLwqSs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HI1ltUkmyPNVYEphbpDC6aJEDGC4MkWmx5mJ8+rNteWYPFCE4oyYbTnBIDCl7MCjaX NZ0seAswMNrUvMb3b2dDVHhIQZVa5/h7pe0mXMXev91x71H/6PA0M59TmTDKtvC4zo7M 5fkHmpMMJh3VFA1zJFOInRCx2kxNRvFRkleUM= Received: by 10.216.3.144 with SMTP id 16mr1988313weh.45.1296652376870; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:12:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n78sm12101874weq.3.2011.02.02.05.12.54 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:12:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:12:52 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110202131252.4c8563df@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <8BB19CF584084C298AA7F3BD4F3AC385@admin> References: <20110202120033.349E710657CC@hub.freebsd.org> <8BB19CF584084C298AA7F3BD4F3AC385@admin> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Starting from Scratch! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:14:14 -0000 On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:09:11 -0000 "Graham Bentley" wrote: > After several months away from FreeBSD I am asking > for advice on versions for general desktop / interest > use [non critical learning platform] > > Should I hang on a bit for 8.2 to go current? > > Or will I easily be able to update RC3 in any case? Updating from RC's is normally straightforward. I don't think it's supported by freebsd-update though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 13:15:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A98106564A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:15:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc2-cmbg14-2-0-cust883.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [86.26.3.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786A28FC12 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:15:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.73 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PkcC6-000AAe-7f for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:52:22 +0000 Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:52:22 +0000 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110202125222.GB3267@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20110202120033.349E710657CC@hub.freebsd.org> <8BB19CF584084C298AA7F3BD4F3AC385@admin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SFyWQ0h3ruR435lw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8BB19CF584084C298AA7F3BD4F3AC385@admin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE amd64 Sender: Daniel Bye Subject: Re: Starting from Scratch! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:15:14 -0000 --SFyWQ0h3ruR435lw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:09:11PM -0000, Graham Bentley wrote: > After several months away from FreeBSD I am asking > for advice on versions for general desktop / interest > use [non critical learning platform] >=20 > Should I hang on a bit for 8.2 to go current? Nah, install now and upgrade when 8.2 is released - after all, your stated use for the system is learning! >=20 > Or will I easily be able to update RC3 in any case? Yes, very easily, provided you follow the prescribed technique. Full details in the handbook, of course. Dan --=20 Daniel Bye _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --SFyWQ0h3ruR435lw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk1JU4YACgkQixf5fBYiFmqtfACeKjkdZxq8uCklK5RlSdYRxrv2 uFMAoJeuJ7mgjFlQYI0hG0J9B9IOYBlJ =ziad -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SFyWQ0h3ruR435lw-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 13:20:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0C01065670 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:20:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327158FC15 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so8140860wyf.13 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:20:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CEtZS8NlE861eMcbu3yGRObIv2UZ8Ge5n7r8BFtammA=; b=VVhZhytuLrq2TvrZhonEq+dKr2MzZYxvS0bFJYHaJxTrVbl40xh/TRSrE2iuA6hXvp +/mt2+11Q7oWbgapiKG016oxKlPSg+CON3X19f+OvrYnD0jF5WDmcTunwnqRZORCfy9+ VhDNZhMJpJMCjK5kSqleSBX3msubM8HHl/IdA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ulaMh1+mlNvn8UFzXYwN5LrjMEqStXgP8bR59H9sVRein+O5XPKH0imbiXZKpZWHaf vtGTixk0YRSTtYIkfbQXBsESyAyyOWHH/XPfQjfWMllvkW5y02qx9wDT/y8/5Gul1UVj KO+HJB8YzTQb73y2FsbSl8x/XXOiFFXw6lApk= Received: by 10.227.134.144 with SMTP id j16mr3659537wbt.70.1296652846851; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:20:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u2sm9503399weh.36.2011.02.02.05.20.45 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:20:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:20:43 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110202132043.40ade6f3@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <201102020703.33098.lumiwa@gmail.com> References: <201102020703.33098.lumiwa@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: perl - update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:20:48 -0000 On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:03:32 -0600 ajtiM wrote: > Hi! > > My system: FreeBSD 8.1 > > I like to update perl to higher version and I don't want to screw > up... I red /usr/ports/UPDATING: > > "perl-after-upgrade" script supplied with lang/perl5.12 > > If I update to perl 5.12.3 is it enough that I run above script, > please? In /etc/make.conf I have: > # added by use.perl 2010-11-05 > 17:40:46 PERL_VERSION=5.8.9 > > I have above from version 8.0. Do I need to change version from 5.8.9 > to 5.12 or to 5.12.3? > In UPDATING it also says: " If you want to switch to lang/perl5.12 from lang/perl5.{8,10} please follow instructions in the entry 20100715 in this file." Note that 5.8.9 is built out of a different port to 5.12.3 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 13:46:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451A5106564A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:46:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05468FC14 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so7769663iwn.13 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:46:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; bh=8fMdYYFg2KU7+kf16GGi42dkzWR9WD31EAXPgoT6MrM=; b=cK4pgjESpWXDo68eYypVCGtiEdVKYq8mjzQ7HZuRmdpN/kcIvpr0EcmXicqiYI60Lz 2poz1X8ORXuiMqxk1S1kndWKF75GAkipEk9BkNyjt65lJJQKSrUsZsRKCVcehuZLs1NH sxFaVTLwm3wYFgv4OVbxH0JN03K9UzOWonAOE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=XiUIzzNsJQiZBOpGeP6OK98+kv5XWf9O/E1wh/EO/I2PoicgxdrM2oWpERA46Vutfr 3gmTqxqACYemKsxjeaABpfC91JcS9ReYasws3IBPJAi9MFOGn1oEA92uu+FHwR5Bcoll TxBEkEDxNgqqiRwJgDSshgphVbwFJAfBawGbM= Received: by 10.42.225.10 with SMTP id iq10mr11243690icb.508.1296654413106; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:46:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from athena.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z4sm19847775ibg.7.2011.02.02.05.46.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:46:52 -0800 (PST) From: ajtiM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:47:02 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.5.5; i386; ; ) References: <201102020703.33098.lumiwa@gmail.com> <20110202132043.40ade6f3@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20110202132043.40ade6f3@gumby.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201102020747.02768.lumiwa@gmail.com> Subject: Re: perl - update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:46:54 -0000 On Wednesday February 2 2011 07:20:43 RW wrote: > On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:03:32 -0600 > > ajtiM wrote: > > Hi! > > > > My system: FreeBSD 8.1 > > > > I like to update perl to higher version and I don't want to screw > > up... I red /usr/ports/UPDATING: > > > > "perl-after-upgrade" script supplied with lang/perl5.12 > > > > If I update to perl 5.12.3 is it enough that I run above script, > > please? In /etc/make.conf I have: > > # added by use.perl 2010-11-05 > > 17:40:46 PERL_VERSION=5.8.9 > > > > I have above from version 8.0. Do I need to change version from 5.8.9 > > to 5.12 or to 5.12.3? > > In UPDATING it also says: > > " If you want to switch to lang/perl5.12 from lang/perl5.{8,10} please > follow instructions in the entry 20100715 in this file." > > > Note that 5.8.9 is built out of a different port to 5.12.3 > Thank you very much. But I like to know if I need to change entry in make.conf: # added by use.perl 2010-11-05 17:40:46 PERL_VERSION=5.8.9 to PERL_VERSION=5.12.3 or just delete those line. Thanks in advance. Mitja -------- http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 13:59:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5879B106564A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:59:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sorem-real-atualcard@sorem.onda.com.br) Received: from sorem.onda.com.br (sorem.onda.com.br [200.195.197.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83868FC1A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:59:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by sorem.onda.com.br (Postfix, from userid 0) id 10B9A2269376; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:32:38 -0200 (BRST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: CARTÕES MAIS BARATO Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SOREM-Campaign-ID: 38_801806001296647285 X-Mailer: SOREM Message-Id: <20110202133238.10B9A2269376@sorem.onda.com.br> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:32:38 -0200 (BRST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?1000__Cart=F5es_de_Visita_por_17=2C00?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: CARTÕES MAIS BARATO List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:59:09 -0000 [1]Cartões Mais Barato Pensando no Produto mais barato que existe? Só aqui é mais barato! [2]Cartões de visita Para você vender mais e lucrar mais. [3]Varios pontos de distribuição em São paulo Entregas em todo Brasil [4]Cartões Mais Barato A Cartoes Mais Barato é contra o spam na rede. Caso você não queira receber nossos e-mails, clique neste [5]link. References 1. http://sorem.onda.com.br/sorem/click.php?s=3b2acc10de360834510fd6e70329c0af&e=7d4dfaf7a6317b3dc81e950f98287e59&u=http://www.cartoesmaisbarato.com.br 2. http://sorem.onda.com.br/sorem/click.php?s=3b2acc10de360834510fd6e70329c0af&e=7d4dfaf7a6317b3dc81e950f98287e59&u=http://www.cartoesmaisbarato.com.br/produtos/cartoes-de-visita-verniz-total-frente/5.htm 3. http://sorem.onda.com.br/sorem/click.php?s=3b2acc10de360834510fd6e70329c0af&e=7d4dfaf7a6317b3dc81e950f98287e59&u=http://cartoesmaisbarato.com.br/index/pontos 4. http://sorem.onda.com.br/sorem/click.php?s=3b2acc10de360834510fd6e70329c0af&e=7d4dfaf7a6317b3dc81e950f98287e59&u=http://www.cartoesmaisbarato.com.br 5. http://sorem.onda.com.br/sorem/optout.php?s=3b2acc10de360834510fd6e70329c0af&e=7d4dfaf7a6317b3dc81e950f98287e59&u=http://www.ondaexpress.com.br From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 14:20:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0856106566B for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:20:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from judmarc@fastmail.fm) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892048FC1E for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651D52074F; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:20:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:20:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; s=smtpout; bh=ZzAe8yB+87eAMnOZ81IxGsuPfAU=; b=hV2HJ9zJ7aUqI9LpRpNeQpuQyQxjgVw0c2Fj7uu5E/qTPggCfVjuZN6LW1Q5p5p5WBJheUpthGUGNj0x/GbyYwglvoxueMQlTg/EIFGpEc4rhTnOtUW/fpk50sKbZhmt/yI2dLIDi9RVslCsIu/0prehFf0VL0C/AftwBwq0IMA= X-Sasl-enc: GbN8V1RS5sMjGasz7gaHa0tn55tsytZFjF8szNRU6K/7 1296656426 Received: from [10.0.0.192] (unknown [12.104.121.82]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22954406FC0; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:20:26 -0500 (EST) References: <4D48BEC7.4030705@comcast.net> <4D48EFDF.90109@comcast.net> <4D48F247.4000007@frozen-zone.org> <4D48F650.3060205@comcast.net> <4D48FDF1.5040504@comcast.net> <4D490635.8090601@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <4D490635.8090601@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8C148a) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <846A306B-270D-48FF-8856-2504791814A4@fastmail.fm> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8C148a) From: Jud Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:20:23 -0500 To: Rem P Roberti Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Opening Opera as user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:20:27 -0000 Just wanted to mention that Flash works fine for me with native Opera and th= e opera-linuxplugins port. So did you install linux-Opera from the port? I haven't run linux-Opera on = FreeBSD in a while (I run it in Linux:), so I don't recall - is the binary c= alled "opera" or "linux-opera"? Jud Sent from my iPhone On Feb 2, 2011, at 2:22 AM, Rem P Roberti wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> I always start x as user. I learned early on not to make the >> mistake of starting X as root. I use Fluxbox with X, and had a >> terminal window open there with root invoked for that window. That= 's when I first tried to open linux-opera. Naturally, it >> opened fine, but will not open if I try to do the same thing from >> a terminal window as user. I would like to set up Opera to open >> from the Fluxbox menu, but in order for that to happen the program >> needs to be opened as user, which is just what I can't do. >>=20 >>=20 >> I'm not an opera user so maybe there's a reason I'm not aware of, but why= are you using linux-opera and not the native version? >>=20 >> You can try to run it under truss(1) to see if that gives any clues as wh= ere it's failing. >>=20 >=20 > The reason that I installed linux-opera, as opposed to the native version,= is that all of the linux plugins seem to work quite well with this version.= Flash, for example, works beautifully, which is something that I have neve= r had success using with any other browser and FreeBSD. >=20 > Rem > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 14:27:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52038106566B for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:27:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63C48FC12 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so9770wwf.31 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:27:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=m2STk5/fkZbYkc5k0nQYL7DlYat5V7Q4FfukRHNwO5Y=; b=dynmTYYcG6sL1aZy+ct0iCFltp8qMZIRqS0QrT0FMi79CuAPpes3v03aZHz4YPZBDU e7PBnl6Tprry4ZOF9uVlvrE96IAF6zK5ZdcCsCxCicnkUar4XjrkBo8uWlG9vGzyevlc lWCbBcnxh5uKHXV++Guf4IU1D8zUHdNcjpZXw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UJSdqXyVSYLD+NRfJwqi2HImZ/UJ0j9qRWSFFgJg7dccaSLaM4gO5B99KRnQTHIDrt j5yoF40L5RV7nwlUAgCb0lsilbzmI9PSNcq9arhFSbWUYivZiuTpAlHCxtxExak2JY66 eM78GrHnedFdABUk8jCpoV6fTy0krQ6gsAlHQ= Received: by 10.216.178.138 with SMTP id f10mr8146607wem.98.1296656858782; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:27:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t5sm12134447wes.33.2011.02.02.06.27.36 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:27:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:27:35 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110202142735.0366b69d@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <201102020747.02768.lumiwa@gmail.com> References: <201102020703.33098.lumiwa@gmail.com> <20110202132043.40ade6f3@gumby.homeunix.com> <201102020747.02768.lumiwa@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: perl - update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:27:40 -0000 On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:47:02 -0600 ajtiM wrote: > Thank you very much. But I like to know if I need to change entry in > make.conf: > # added by use.perl 2010-11-05 > 17:40:46 PERL_VERSION=5.8.9 > > to PERL_VERSION=5.12.3 > > or just delete those line. You don't need to do anything, it'll be updated by installing the new version of perl. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 14:57:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895EA1065670 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:57:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from the.lists@mgm51.com) Received: from oneyou.mcmli.com (oneyou.mcmli.com [216.194.67.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673FF8FC23 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:57:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sentry.24cl.com (c-76-28-47-52.hsd1.ct.comcast.net [76.28.47.52]) by oneyou.mcmli.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7263B284C0 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:57:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from BigBloat (unknown [10.23.90.40]) by sentry.24cl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F0EE1FBBE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:57:25 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <201102020957230235.00262C7C@sentry.24cl.com> In-Reply-To: <4D4870A8.3060706@ifdnrg.com> References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> <20110201102301.2ae55810@scorpio> <201102011326580606.004CE418@sentry.24cl.com> <861v3rzgcs.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <4D4870A8.3060706@ifdnrg.com> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.09.1098 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (P) Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:57:23 -0500 From: "Mike." To: "FreeBSD" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:57:26 -0000 On 2/1/2011 at 8:44 PM Paul Macdonald wrote: |On 01/02/2011 19:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: |> |> No, seriously... I was using sendmail before discovering postfix, and |> pretty darn good at m4. Or is that m4()dnl()? :) |> |> But I've never found postfix without a knob to do something I want it to |> do, and most of the knobs are set properly right out of the box. (And |> reasonably named too!) |> |so for us folks still using sendmail (which works fine for me) | |what benefits do we get with postfix that'd outweigh the hassles of |changing? ============= If you are happy with sendmail, why change a working thing? For me, the need to move to Postfix became very apparent once I wanted to make some [what I thought to be] simple configuration changes (different transports for different domains, virtual mailboxes, etc.). I found sendmail's configuration to be daunting. So I looked elsewhere. About ten years ago I started using Postix and I've not looked back. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 15:21:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B26106564A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:21:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5827D8FC08 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so63416wwf.31 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:21:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SPHT2msKeugaHhHRqsgMNmF9Pn5503y9qN9T5r9x8ys=; b=sF3dF6whrebPN2L/y+y67ij+u3llTt6iTjddQNFqszF3Vw1ATi1dVeuJalWTbZWHES 3FUCKqrRtXQotFCytkasq22G3ZLTOxor8+ib3psFWiVQBVDb3E+x0QfM+iMy+aRqMSQ7 nwiq8McnuoW88rQ3l1b+BlWKcWpIy2TBERm1U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=qHigZDHJyImtuoSqbxzTN0iUnCj35dS13/t4jEcW5w8Q9axUqulVFRQ8kgTNRCexL8 cJu8/PfubYjtn5qeOnh8wEOYdTTQ/ZVwKKHMiyYZ2pc2se5F76hUS1k3Un45ra+QJ5Qe uHQ9Y/NJ0EFF9PLXlGyazz66U+ERD7vc6yIe8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.142.224 with SMTP id i74mr2276419wej.83.1296660043579; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:20:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.80.147 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:20:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:20:43 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Ivan Voras Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4k drives and zfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:21:13 -0000 On 2 February 2011 12:18, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 02/02/2011 05:52, krad wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> A quick question. Im upgrading my filer at home to have 2x 2tb samsung >> F4EG drives. I believe these are 4k drives. I'm intending to use the >> gnop trick to get zfs ashift to 12. Will this make my pool unbootable. >> I have read a few threads aluding to this. > > There have been bugs which make such drives unbootable but they have been > fixed at least in CURRENT (I haven't tried it). > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > where they related to any type of pools in particular as im just mirroring From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 15:51:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC185106566C for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:51:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.27.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09858FC1A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.60]) by qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 33hS1g0011HpZEsAB3rUpH; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:51:28 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 33rT1g00Z46zqiB8a3rUhT; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:51:28 +0000 Message-ID: <4D497D7F.80505@comcast.net> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:51:27 -0800 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110131 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RW References: <4D48BEC7.4030705@comcast.net> <20110202104926.2c2a0f2f@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20110202104926.2c2a0f2f@gumby.homeunix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Opening Opera as user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:51:29 -0000 >> I installed linux-opera, and I guess I made a mistake by opening it >> the first time as root, when I should have opened as user. At any >> rate, I can now only open the browser as root, and when I do I get >> this message: >> >> opera: $HOME set to /root. Use -personaldir if you do not want to use >> /root/.opera/ >> > Don't focus on this because you shouldn't be running it as root at all. > What actually happens when you try to run it as an normal user? Nothing. No error messages. The program will simply not open at all if I try to do so as user. Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 15:56:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C66106566B for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:56:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05518FC08 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:56:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.44]) by qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 33td1g00C0xGWP8583wS2u; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:56:26 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 33wQ1g00h46zqiB3Y3wRtf; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:56:25 +0000 Message-ID: <4D497EA6.5020500@comcast.net> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:56:22 -0800 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110131 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jud References: <4D48BEC7.4030705@comcast.net> <4D48EFDF.90109@comcast.net> <4D48F247.4000007@frozen-zone.org> <4D48F650.3060205@comcast.net> <4D48FDF1.5040504@comcast.net> <4D490635.8090601@comcast.net> <846A306B-270D-48FF-8856-2504791814A4@fastmail.fm> In-Reply-To: <846A306B-270D-48FF-8856-2504791814A4@fastmail.fm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Opening Opera as user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:56:26 -0000 > Just wanted to mention that Flash works fine for me with native Opera and the opera-linuxplugins port. > > So did you install linux-Opera from the port? I haven't run linux-Opera on FreeBSD in a while (I run it in Linux:), so I don't recall - is the binary called "opera" or "linux-opera"? > > Jud > > >>> I always start x as user. I learned early on not to make the >>> mistake of starting X as root. I use Fluxbox with X, and had a >>> terminal window open there with root invoked for that window. That's when I first tried to open linux-opera. Naturally, it >>> opened fine, but will not open if I try to do the same thing from >>> a terminal window as user. I would like to set up Opera to open >>> from the Fluxbox menu, but in order for that to happen the program >>> needs to be opened as user, which is just what I can't do. >>> >>> >>> I'm not an opera user so maybe there's a reason I'm not aware of, but why are you using linux-opera and not the native version? >>> >>> You can try to run it under truss(1) to see if that gives any clues as where it's failing. >>> >> The reason that I installed linux-opera, as opposed to the native version, is that all of the linux plugins seem to work quite well with this version. Flash, for example, works beautifully, which is something that I have never had success using with any other browser and FreeBSD. >> >> Rem I installed the program from the ports. And, yes, the binary is called linux-opera. If I can't figure out why the program refuses to open as user I will probably do a pkg_delete and start over, especially since you seem to have the plug-ins working fine with the native program. Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 16:14:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C4C106566B for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grullonbb@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A548FC08 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:14:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws9 with SMTP id 9so62182vws.13 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:14:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=XrKKeFLV5IAowphnWMxGuDEfVDwgsTCjUyV4BVhuavY=; b=XW2Vv5yc6YahEq7/15MCaeiy1XEDtEE+j/1NN9/itdOkCZoX08l9tl/TQXGl6iHGgN /EmtnU0SWZTe/OMaVGfHvYkYzWNBrOFAdeQqR7VO37zU4pE7xYv4KDj0PH67mYuqn5/7 /nrL4TTD/GAnXTFAoIGMyYJr2g9zmzG0a58qg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=HkUb/Tm39Dl56z1qlalWkPKFcNCrzxB4ytzs//1lhGrWAgjtKlhiqZh/lvng8xLzbL 4BAREYWg1kuF0oJIHUqEQTHwXG+YLlBC+JPTzwskNDqxl74RonNjAy1cIojE4T4HDAkd gFzfv/3ItkXjpEjUEW7e7pzhzlHPJkvQ/12CY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.182.196 with SMTP id cd4mr4586702qcb.215.1296661526985; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:45:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.183.9 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:44:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:44:26 -0500 Message-ID: From: Lisandro Grullon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: default route desappear. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:14:29 -0000 Dear list, I have been doing some remote work using ssh and BPF. From time to time I feel like restarting /etc/rc.d/netif using a static configuration and noticed that my default route gets delete even when I have everything se as static under /etc/rc.conf. The only way I can get my default route back is by restarting /etc/rc.d/routing which is uncomfortable besides doing the manual route add default xx.xx.xx.xx. Why is this behavior happening when rc.conf has the propoer setting for defaultrouter? Thank you ina dvance. Lisandro From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 16:22:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7022C106564A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:22:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFED8FC08 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta23.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.90]) by qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 32wd1g00A1wfjNsA84Nrey; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:22:51 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta23.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 34No1g00c46zqiB8j4NpLV; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:22:49 +0000 Message-ID: <4D4984D8.4030701@comcast.net> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:22:48 -0800 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110131 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jud References: <4D48BEC7.4030705@comcast.net> <4D48EFDF.90109@comcast.net> <4D48F247.4000007@frozen-zone.org> <4D48F650.3060205@comcast.net> <4D48FDF1.5040504@comcast.net> <4D490635.8090601@comcast.net> <846A306B-270D-48FF-8856-2504791814A4@fastmail.fm> <4D497EA6.5020500@comcast.net> <8A885D72-5025-48D1-8AD4-E8B10802FE12@fastmail.fm> In-Reply-To: <8A885D72-5025-48D1-8AD4-E8B10802FE12@fastmail.fm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Opening Opera as user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:22:52 -0000 > When you run whereis linux-opera as root, what is the result ( other than the port directory)? > > Jud > whereis linux-opera linux-opera: /usr/local/bin/linux-opera /usr/local/man/man1/linux-opera.1.gz /usr/ports/www/linux-opera Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 16:29:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5875810656A5 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:29:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02CE8FC0A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p12GT2xN002192 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:29:02 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <4D49864E.9070108@qeng-ho.org> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:29:02 +0000 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101218 Thunderbird/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ZFS and switching from ad to ada disks. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:29:05 -0000 I'm currently running 8.1-R without AHCI enabled, with a raidz zpool based on /dev/ad* disks, plus one system disk that's UFS2, mounted using partition labels. I need to enable AHCI in order to get hot pluggable eSata capability, and that's going to rename the disks to /dev/ada*. Will zfs handle that OK, or should I zpool export before the switch and zpool import after? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 16:33:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3DD106566B for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:33:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Received: from ifdnrg29.ifdnrg.com (outbound.ifdnrg.com [193.200.98.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6238FC18 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:32:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.85] (93-97-172-73.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.172.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by ifdnrg29.ifdnrg.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p12GWvbL081981; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:32:58 GMT (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Message-ID: <4D498736.4080909@ifdnrg.com> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:32:54 +0000 From: Paul Macdonald User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lisandro Grullon References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: default route desappear. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:33:00 -0000 On 02/02/2011 15:44, Lisandro Grullon wrote: > Dear list, > I have been doing some remote work using ssh and BPF. From time to time I > feel like restarting /etc/rc.d/netif using a static configuration and > noticed that my default route gets delete even when I have everything se as > static under /etc/rc.conf. The only way I can get my default route back is > by restarting /etc/rc.d/routing which is uncomfortable besides doing the > manual route add default xx.xx.xx.xx. Why is this behavior happening when > rc.conf has the propoer setting for defaultrouter? Thank you ina dvance. > Lisandro > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I do /etc/rc.d/netif restart && /etc/rc.d/routing restart then you don't need to manually add the route again -- ------------------------- Paul Macdonald IFDNRG Ltd Web and video hosting ------------------------- t: 0131 5548070 m: 07534206249 e: paul@ifdnrg.com w: http://www.ifdnrg.com ------------------------- IFDNRG 40 Maritime Street Edinburgh EH6 6SA ------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 16:37:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D082106566C for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:37:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC298FC15 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:37:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p12GbvnY030153; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:37:57 GMT Received: from orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (80-45-152-196.static.dsl.as9105.com [80.45.152.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p12GbukA030144; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:37:56 GMT Received: by orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 34FF233C3D; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:37:56 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:37:56 +0000 From: Frank Shute To: Alessandro Baggi Message-ID: <20110202163756.GC2363@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-RC2 amd64 X-Organisation: 'shute.org.uk' Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:37:59 -0000 On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 03:32:26PM +0100, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > > Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix? > > thanks in advance I've used both and both have their advocates/supporters. I used qmail for about 10 yrs and picked it when basically the choice was qmail, sendmail and smail. It worked well and was install and configure and don't do anything else for 10 years. Then a few years ago I was building a new machine and decided to re-assess the MTA; I chose Postfix and am very pleased with it. I chose Postfix because more people run it and support was likely easier to come across, not because of any perceived inadequacies of qmail. When you do decide on your MTA, I'd recommend buying a book which documents it. What I'd also say is that Postfix is probably easier to install and configure. I installed qmail from source but used the port for Postfix. Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 17:12:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A47106566B for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:12:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C148FC0C for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:12:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so173906wwf.31 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:12:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0AwyjF+twvuxR5UQ49bcaeucpUXWt32r0lcqeIDvlo8=; b=DegvxYpD6Mlg3z8BE5fTTOOreMzqqbvcNKlBSX44iv3T16IFbPONLBKYUdZZ+VHZfs CP+jqg3p/Ib30fA0eRscOyF40Uxb7xl7N0SHGPIuxA7k4i6u7XUpudJyAIT14r5tQpAC Fpm6OKJOcjMbM9XxF69/qjmn2/07IHQtL8iIw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=wo+bAbyaCPKluTGWbxR7ZGfx0aEUk3vj8u6s2FfSDw96almjT7khyWnT2ErUi8nxeU VABBG8eIha6qTJebdCq3JoXf0AAC/W6kJ4gUyNrIOsUdywYCDupVBDpFUnfmwu5DBYHI 8bS2uOkab2p42uFfBmv3sjIwkXe7dGtq05/ww= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.13.194 with SMTP id b44mr8396134web.68.1296666725729; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:12:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.80.147 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:12:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D49864E.9070108@qeng-ho.org> References: <4D49864E.9070108@qeng-ho.org> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:12:05 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Arthur Chance Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: ZFS and switching from ad to ada disks. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:12:07 -0000 On 2 February 2011 16:29, Arthur Chance wrote: > I'm currently running 8.1-R without AHCI enabled, with a raidz zpool based > on /dev/ad* disks, plus one system disk that's UFS2, mounted using partition > labels. I need to enable AHCI in order to get hot pluggable eSata > capability, and that's going to rename the disks to /dev/ada*. Will zfs > handle that OK, or should I zpool export before the switch and zpool import > after? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > should handle it ok, especially as you are not booting from the pool. After all you can import a solaris pool into the fbsd box and vice versa, and the device names there are wildly different From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 17:54:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4691065670 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:54:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1258FC0C for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:54:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p12HmN2r025378; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:48:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id p12HmNWi025377; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:48:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:48:23 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Graham Bentley Message-ID: <20110202174823.GA25290@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20110202120033.349E710657CC@hub.freebsd.org> <8BB19CF584084C298AA7F3BD4F3AC385@admin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8BB19CF584084C298AA7F3BD4F3AC385@admin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Starting from Scratch! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:54:01 -0000 On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:09:11PM -0000, Graham Bentley wrote: > After several months away from FreeBSD I am asking > for advice on versions for general desktop / interest > use [non critical learning platform] > > Should I hang on a bit for 8.2 to go current? > > Or will I easily be able to update RC3 in any case? It really depends on how much in a hurry you are. If timeing and a little wait doesn't matter, I would wait for 8.2. It is always just a trifle easier to install from scratch than update. But, having said that, it should not be very difficult to move to 8.2 from 8.1. ////jerry > > Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 18:13:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05CA1065675 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:13:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from judmarc@fastmail.fm) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FD78FC12 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:13:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08389207AF; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:13:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:13:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; s=smtpout; bh=TkZZJyLqBTd+n0Ra4eppBEcjdA8=; b=X4VvkEYFORcMadzYzn5au1xVA+vA8jSZFyMK/6fUbQ3R8ip0wa9fvSa7iaD0d3wXb7RAFXBojreirnODekBpQNanFWSRbveeIX+wRXL4jIMFM1cZ0k6NN1tutsatWpsFdzrlXedQFHi3Nk8oQt0CKnvnATK7BTgDVHH7HoXRkiw= X-Sasl-enc: Lb2yCaG3IgOAiyMVMyF42jA6q3u6RU5wzSeiuxrta7/I 1296670425 Received: from [10.119.233.133] (unknown [166.137.9.143]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C6104443D0; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:13:45 -0500 (EST) References: <4D48BEC7.4030705@comcast.net> <4D48EFDF.90109@comcast.net> <4D48F247.4000007@frozen-zone.org> <4D48F650.3060205@comcast.net> <4D48FDF1.5040504@comcast.net> <4D490635.8090601@comcast.net> <846A306B-270D-48FF-8856-2504791814A4@fastmail.fm> <4D497EA6.5020500@comcast.net> <8A885D72-5025-48D1-8AD4-E8B10802FE12@fastmail.fm> <4D4984D8.4030701@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <4D4984D8.4030701@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8C148a) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <14C4D5FA-D703-473C-A83D-42E53BF0F763@fastmail.fm> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8C148a) From: Jud Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:13:40 -0500 To: Rem P Roberti Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Opening Opera as user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:13:47 -0000 Right place, so all I can figure is when you initially ran it, the .opera or= .linux-opera folder, whichever it is, was put in /root instead of /home/$US= ER. Looking as root or super-user, got such a folder in /root? Jud Sent from my iPhone On Feb 2, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Rem P Roberti wrote: >=20 >> When you run whereis linux-opera as root, what is the result ( other than= the port directory)? >>=20 >> Jud >>=20 >=20 > whereis linux-opera > linux-opera: /usr/local/bin/linux-opera /usr/local/man/man1/linux-opera.1.= gz /usr/ports/www/linux-opera >=20 > Rem >=20 >=20 >=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 18:31:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36ABA1065675 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:31:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1ED38FC15 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p12IUwD3015401; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:30:58 GMT Received: from orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (80-45-152-196.static.dsl.as9105.com [80.45.152.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p12IUvLb015393; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:30:57 GMT Received: by orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1778C33C3D; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:30:57 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:30:57 +0000 From: Frank Shute To: Graham Bentley Message-ID: <20110202183057.GE2363@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <20110202120033.349E710657CC@hub.freebsd.org> <8BB19CF584084C298AA7F3BD4F3AC385@admin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8BB19CF584084C298AA7F3BD4F3AC385@admin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-RC2 amd64 X-Organisation: 'shute.org.uk' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Starting from Scratch! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:31:01 -0000 On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:09:11PM -0000, Graham Bentley wrote: > > After several months away from FreeBSD I am asking > for advice on versions for general desktop / interest > use [non critical learning platform] > > Should I hang on a bit for 8.2 to go current? > > Or will I easily be able to update RC3 in any case? > > Thanks! Graham, you might want to consider doing your installation with a copy of PC-BSD. It's got a better installer than FreeBSD's sysinstall and you can use ZFS if you like. Here's an article which shows the PC-BSD installer in action: http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2010/08/17/pc-bsd-8-1-review/ If I was you, I wouldn't wait for 8.2, I'd get stuck in and treat the inevitable upgrade as a learning experience. Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 18:54:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CD51065673 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:54:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahman.linux@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DA98FC23 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 18:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so292103qwj.13 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 10:54:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=h2sTYE5HAzEtlj6oajey2dFxYl5+cH7XG67NOozKRPQ=; b=tNnIc502T1O6TF46wKaw0zliUsC27P5oic+MCuHuyN9Vx6yMrImj8zUG/kZZ9c1kMG e8ek2Wp8RqJoG1AWcXwO0qGCaYk0Wtu6SgTR1kRu4+Urt41XZa/l5G4A5HSQ7UX01/Xx j+V9loPumOwvCJ0ro/w3+FFeS4Q28ZjNApXs0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=t53Zl+1zljhAZzSPuK8ygVi5nioV5ZHSzBNF2VBbfm2WtH/dBpsR66FAP6peAF5eS6 u4bgUmtZPkYB+HaQIBYcGYmJrVNlPdWaXLGECAsSxG4iidJxDoPpeIsPopzYhi79Ghjo rOe77hUIsg+gdmHBNiesqlpS9Rswc43Cquya0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.37.20 with SMTP id v20mr8873071qad.216.1296672882268; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 10:54:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.195.137 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:54:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 22:24:42 +0330 Message-ID: From: Bahman Kahinpour To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Using foo2zjs filter without CUPS (with FreeBSD's standard LPD instead) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:54:43 -0000 Hello, I have a HP LaserJet P1102 printer and I managed to get it working with CUPS and "foo2zjs" filter from foo2zjs.rkkda.com. I am interested in removing the CUPS and using the native LPD system of FreeBSD. But I have a question. What command should I specify as "if" Input Filter or "of" Output Filter in the /etc/printcap file for using it with LPD and foo2zjs filter? The point is that I am sure it will work with foo2zjs and LPD as /dev/ulpt0 is recognized and works fine and I may simply use that as output port and there is nothing CUPS-dependent in foo2zjs. Thanks in advance Good Luck Bahman Kahinpour From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 19:40:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097EF106567A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 19:40:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.27.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79498FC14 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 19:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.27]) by qmta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 37aN1g00A0b6N64AC7ge8u; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:40:38 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 37gc1g00R46zqiB8P7gd4X; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:40:38 +0000 Message-ID: <4D49B334.6010308@comcast.net> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:40:36 -0800 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110131 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jud References: <4D48BEC7.4030705@comcast.net> <4D48EFDF.90109@comcast.net> <4D48F247.4000007@frozen-zone.org> <4D48F650.3060205@comcast.net> <4D48FDF1.5040504@comcast.net> <4D490635.8090601@comcast.net> <846A306B-270D-48FF-8856-2504791814A4@fastmail.fm> <4D497EA6.5020500@comcast.net> <8A885D72-5025-48D1-8AD4-E8B10802FE12@fastmail.fm> <4D4984D8.4030701@comcast.net> <14C4D5FA-D703-473C-A83D-42E53BF0F763@fastmail.fm> In-Reply-To: <14C4D5FA-D703-473C-A83D-42E53BF0F763@fastmail.fm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Opening Opera as user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:40:39 -0000 > Right place, so all I can figure is when you initially ran it, the .opera or .linux-opera folder, whichever it is, was put in /root instead of /home/$USER. Looking as root or super-user, got such a folder in /root? > > Jud > Nope...that was the weird thing. There was nothing in /root that referred to either opera or linux-opera. But the problem is now moot. I deleted the linux-opera package and installed the native opera package along with linux-operaplugins and everything seems to be working fine. Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 20:35:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C65F5106564A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 20:35:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863308FC18 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 20:35:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-143-131.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.143.131]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E933D10B; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 21:35:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id p12KZcxG001588; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 21:35:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 21:35:37 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Bahman Kahinpour Message-Id: <20110202213537.18134b47.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using foo2zjs filter without CUPS (with FreeBSD's standard LPD instead) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 20:35:40 -0000 On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 22:24:42 +0330, Bahman Kahinpour wrote: > Hello, > > I have a HP LaserJet P1102 printer and I managed to get it working > with CUPS and "foo2zjs" filter from foo2zjs.rkkda.com. I am interested > in removing the CUPS and using the native LPD system of FreeBSD. But I > have a question. > > What command should I specify as "if" Input Filter or "of" Output > Filter in the /etc/printcap file for using it with LPD and foo2zjs > filter? Something like this (not tested) should work: p1102:HP LaserJet P1102:sh:lp=/dev/ulpt0:sd=/var/spool/lpd/p1102:lf=/var/log/lpd:if=/opt/bin/filter-p1102 Then /opt/bin/filter-p1102 is where the printer filter resides. In "my" nomenclature, /opt is for everything that is not managed by the ports or by the system. Maybe you chose a better location, e. g. /etc/filter-p1102 or /usr/local/filters/filter-p1102, just as you like. Also make sure the spool directory and the log file do exist. The file filter-p1102 itself is just a shell script. It works as a wrapper for your foo2 filter, foo2zjs in your case: #!/bin/sh export PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin /usr/local/bin/foo2zjs-wrapper It reads from stdin and outputs to stdout, and this mechanism is embedded in lpd's processing chain, as far as I understood. > The point is that I am sure it will work with foo2zjs and LPD as > /dev/ulpt0 is recognized and works fine and I may simply use that as > output port and there is nothing CUPS-dependent in foo2zjs. True. Get rid of the CUPS monster and use the excellent system tools to do this simple job. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 22:04:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F1D106564A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 22:04:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C4D8FC16 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 22:04:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so456559iwn.13 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:04:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=QbmqP2EFD34J88s6Fl3b3OX7VjAqp469+owUJuGga+U=; b=K7JqRWR50bYt7dSL9bb7CqfYMrcN6TJEZcbamjqV6fVN67rhXL09XflLJONq/pGvnq Jz0e8pnHc+fTliJrb4kPaUl7vbyVFx+8X76/2WHlOEpNm1fzoBa72kQlT4enHHGodJWt AHS+szxeUjsKOueSCeHx9htLM4ovBRmlBUa9I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=M4anE8ozKx3UEpg10PDe0Sa0MCjMFFhSZvHxiEp0hxEG+yIEns/jTMEYleuEqPncNa bhBW7Lq1dI85z6DmSSur6NPD5vHnuxwxhnxFFPS1MVH2WnjPkJD7S2LH74K+7HWzIeEo jZkHRw4F3RXLU8wNxsV3uEpVHymoqOjIIlZ3c= Received: by 10.231.31.13 with SMTP id w13mr10680386ibc.125.1296684263371; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:04:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from athena.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gy41sm58595ibb.17.2011.02.02.14.04.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:04:21 -0800 (PST) From: ajtiM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:04:07 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.5.5; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201102021604.08298.lumiwa@gmail.com> Subject: perl update again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 22:04:24 -0000 Hi! Again me with the perl update from 5.8 to 5.12. I did portmaster -o lang/perl5.12 /lang/perl5.8 and upgrade was without problem. Than I ran portmaster -r perl- and there were also for rebuild "arts", "qt33" which I dont have installed and portmaster --check-depends doesn't shows any problems. I went back to version 5.8 because I don't want to install those ports which I don't have. Did I do something wrong? Thanks in advance. Mitja -------- http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 00:23:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58885106566B for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 00:23:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pedro@dehumanizer.com) Received: from kang.dehumanizer.com (kang.dehumanizer.com [206.125.172.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355FA8FC18 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 00:23:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kang.dehumanizer.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kang.dehumanizer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A234503C for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 00:06:50 +0000 (WET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=dehumanizer.com; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=deh01; bh=gNZMaYbZ9tNUwVocNfNURaEe2+o=; b=g8SGOuG5roaYdHboJtfoakPt3JT8 +vVroNquWaEFRzA1s7aRJ08XbUjZBwQgeTU84xWOd5Q/kk4cVhnx8diPRz0bylnZ HaT6UFha6zquPMHRuG2ZSbj5G9TjZ8wJmFN8W3oAcqHb8rxqP2Rq1NApATxU/Ley jkGExfZfhif7KIE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=dehumanizer.com; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= deh01; b=PO26hru1ktrAZRSQuM+A1W1Z93c5f+/AGWgbVpm3Vkb2POmpGVu7E3C tmfl+dWQXbbCkXj8v9xAB2k+7qkQhFm4UOShw1O5mQIqd7LrQNMvFSL6OwZAPNmZ 0cahsTQoXeX+SCe0kqb2JvSlpYaMVcR339q01O7cDls2cw33lNBc= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (a79-169-228-105.cpe.netcabo.pt [79.169.228.105]) by kang.dehumanizer.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9AB84501E for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 00:06:49 +0000 (WET) Message-ID: <4D49F197.5080304@dehumanizer.com> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:06:47 +0000 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGVkcm8gVGltw7N0ZW8=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> <20110202163756.GC2363@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110202163756.GC2363@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 110202-1, 02-02-2011), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:23:01 -0000 On 02-02-2011 16:37, Frank Shute wrote: > What I'd also say is that Postfix is probably easier to install and > configure. Agreed. Postfix is *really* easy and well documented; so much that I've seen people claim that it "can't be that good" since it's so easy to configure, with great defaults and human-readable config files, and "powerful means hard to configure". From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 02:44:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CEB1065672 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 02:44:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=0008e0cf97=johnl@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [64.57.183.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0668FC13 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 02:44:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68018 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2011 02:17:19 -0000 Received: from mail1.iecc.com (64.57.183.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 3 Feb 2011 02:17:19 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=10f6.4d4a102f.k1102; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=xLsCDKI3gvnrZESLTNfOHiakqpOPuvs3iwT8D51S1E8=; b=C1ywK1LZy1JmftAXSLry6Te7BkoRXHOgXQLeGo6nwLywQQx0s2cW4cI58v0eogmEVf6kXMg8jPWNHV9GLUlfZij/qi6Fh2DSqZM9oZ9o1VhZmk8Hwn9jXnjE/U+t3KpfwvHJ/rIBJgJHf5dStv+cGAOKWLBz6GxxBVKNcv02H0E= VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org Date: 3 Feb 2011 02:17:18 -0000 Message-ID: <20110203021718.4341.qmail@joyce.lan> From: John Levine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20110202163756.GC2363@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: frank@shute.org.uk Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 02:44:01 -0000 >When you do decide on your MTA, I'd recommend buying a book which >documents it. Oh, definitely. Particularly if you decide on qmail. R's, John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 05:15:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6E31065694 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 05:15:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglistmember@mgwigglesworth.net) Received: from mail.mgwigglesworth.net (mail.mgwigglesworth.net [75.146.26.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440918FC13 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 05:15:25 +0000 (UTC) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:14:48 -0500 Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <4D4A39C8.2030305@mgwigglesworth.net> From: "Martes G Wigglesworth" Received: from devsecure.mgwigglesworth.net (comserver1010 [192.168.5.10]) by mail.mgwigglesworth.net; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:13:23 -0500 Organization: M. G. Wigglesworth Holdings, LLC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: CF-Card Install for post FBSD-8.x systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mailinglistmember@mgwigglesworth.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 05:15:26 -0000 Hey guys. Does anyone know what the new "minimal" install size is? I remember running across a blurb about FBSD-7 and above require more space and supposedly won't fit on less than 512MB or something like that. What are these specs? And I feel like I should still be able to product an 8-20MB image for an embedded firewall/network appliance. I am attempting to port my firewall and vpn appliance to a CF-Card, or to the user-loadable flash on this old PIII motherboard which runs this system. I am having a bit of a time locating information in reference to this task, which does not reference 4.x and netbsd. -- Respectfully, Martes G Wigglesworth M. G. Wigglesworth Holdings, LLC www.mgwigglesworth.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 05:21:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C8F1065672 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 05:21:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97278FC0C for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 05:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyf6 with SMTP id 6so481325eyf.13 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 21:21:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CBS3B5SD5H0oTJvTfxChmzqqk2rvyhChOiac9cirdgQ=; b=NUUa1cq5m1Dvm1wA6DZrXV6XM1sVejzL21pFvbpvhlfFDaqQHLh0u59hXkn0TC9M1h X7ENBW0RktO05KPDVSIrLwm68mnZWfMdWYupLjgqgEHoXDVv+mQVChoR3VERda1LlOCS lXZwIGSxsNDfY/aONy1QCfKHG2dioxl+OdnfU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=JQRdNOmYxWAIFljhvNmYocHKSgvpF42hXSOAU52sNnfHC4HBkJ4Y2tztcld42H+1m3 +I4iaQdTzifaPBAm+cbQ+hD2d6tduiLMYRms+uiYHXAVjKX4xWuzERy/h975n/oIh5xn PT7ZTWBoHCkZTZE8UYrbD48o+ZJQugZU5P7OI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.0.133 with SMTP id 5mr293115eeb.10.1296710474993; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 21:21:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.48.75 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 21:21:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D4A39C8.2030305@mgwigglesworth.net> References: <4D4A39C8.2030305@mgwigglesworth.net> Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 00:21:14 -0500 Message-ID: From: Outback Dingo To: mailinglistmember@mgwigglesworth.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CF-Card Install for post FBSD-8.x systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 05:21:17 -0000 a recent 9-HEAD build shows mfsbsd does a build in about 27M Jan 30 19:37 mfsboot.img, so depending on your needs I do know with the bsdbox patch set and some tweaks you can get a working system in 11MB cutting out alot of what a firewall doesnt need :) On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Martes G Wigglesworth < mailinglistmember@mgwigglesworth.net> wrote: > > Hey guys. > > Does anyone know what the new "minimal" install size is? > > I remember running across a blurb about FBSD-7 and above require more > space and supposedly won't fit on less than 512MB or something like that. > > What are these specs? > > And I feel like I should still be able to product an 8-20MB image for an > embedded firewall/network appliance. > > I am attempting to port my firewall and vpn appliance to a CF-Card, or to > the user-loadable flash on this old PIII motherboard which runs this system. > > I am having a bit of a time locating information in reference to this task, > which does not reference 4.x and netbsd. > > -- > Respectfully, > > > Martes G Wigglesworth > M. G. Wigglesworth Holdings, LLC > www.mgwigglesworth.net > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 06:19:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04646106566C for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 06:19:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jan0sch@gmx.net) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 665238FC14 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 06:19:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Feb 2011 06:19:39 -0000 Received: from dslb-088-074-032-211.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO magni) [88.74.32.211] by mail.gmx.net (mp042) with SMTP; 03 Feb 2011 07:19:39 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1545395 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+xRPB/VhWx/J1/775M/RYVD9VcRD7r13N4IxPB6F TkzmZb/COxORO1 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:19:10 +0100 From: Jens Jahnke To: freebsd questions Message-Id: <20110203071910.bdfa18e0.jan0sch@gmx.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.3 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) X-Face: &?!P`87-36gaG)/K:yi&ixw=uy]y'?$vrc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA512"; boundary="Signature=_Thu__3_Feb_2011_07_19_10_+0100_o+OIKyaMthWZwPFx" X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Experience with o2 surf stick X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 06:19:42 -0000 --Signature=_Thu__3_Feb_2011_07_19_10_+0100_o+OIKyaMthWZwPFx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I consider buying a so called "surf stick" for mobile internet access when travelling with my laptop. Has anyone experience with the o2 surf stick (germany) hsdpa & hsupa using freebsd 8? Regards, Jens --=20 03. Hornung 2011, 07:15 Homepage : http://www.jan0sch.de In Mexico we have a word for sushi: bait. -- Josi Simon --Signature=_Thu__3_Feb_2011_07_19_10_+0100_o+OIKyaMthWZwPFx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iQG8BAEBCgAGBQJNSkjxAAoJED2+SXzzbciGa9QM/R/KGG5TH380dc1iLZ2Eo12u fBWS1ewpCu6wFWPPPyGXtVxpCwAjL8QyX5g0nfDcYoAguM8+uU0ZwgqIW3A9ALW+ eHJRwHwF/IGuaTVEWHXdEWXxVn5dKLI0uSebsz0zvGx62BRVDIMsP4oh1a1qtPyL bJZVtzL18axkRn1GGRVn0ajDMlwMyNbNSRFso5iptWuceiP2LlBlnFeWb6pszf4y q6Pf1HIvykXCSzQocIoq2sQPnmES+8WKEDEuZGxOtdhLf3EE/2cABDZUa23Fp2zI l92Polvzn3sQPkpsLZ/kEujsi7G0CMRJS2wwF53GHjeh4P0wc+Ydu3UlN9L9rnqD rGuLBdvczitwWTW9S3qjbZJ9Gw6Q37SEPoQonpQ3bI0HjM3SsDfrHaQjnmbxPfTE jtA9Cse0SVzI8tbnoza+H7kjSxfz5t+I17W9SuFDJPpnVFUzISzjB2pkI8wUkB/V iW+ielO0f4IBx0seejjE3R+ZuvE7OlXrLSJvd3+5kozptjaLHAk2/hKsu1eLtBXP SJxcxnu5sOFuYW5mfy12 =2b6y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__3_Feb_2011_07_19_10_+0100_o+OIKyaMthWZwPFx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 06:51:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154E51065674 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 06:51:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B2E8FC1C for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 06:51:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [193.31.11.193] (helo=current.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pkt1w-0002uZ-6p for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 07:51:00 +0100 Received: from current.Sisis.de (current [127.0.0.1]) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p136oxCU076841 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:50:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p136oxtj076840 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:50:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: current.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:50:59 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110203065059.GA76783@current.Sisis.de> References: <20110203071910.bdfa18e0.jan0sch@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20110203071910.bdfa18e0.jan0sch@gmx.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 193.31.11.193 Subject: Re: Experience with o2 surf stick X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 06:51:03 -0000 El día Thursday, February 03, 2011 a las 07:19:10AM +0100, Jens Jahnke escribió: > Hi, > > I consider buying a so called "surf stick" for mobile internet access > when travelling with my laptop. Has anyone experience with the o2 surf > stick (germany) hsdpa & hsupa using freebsd 8? > > Regards, Hello Jens, "surf stick" is marketing speech and you never know what the ship today below this label and tomorrow, I think. You should convince them and plug it in and see what appears in /var/log/messages, i.e. what vendor and product ID it is. > > Jens > > -- > 03. Hornung 2011, 07:15 > Homepage : http://www.jan0sch.de > > In Mexico we have a word for sushi: bait. > -- Josi Simon comida cebo :-) matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ ¡Ya basta! ¡Tropas de OTAN, fuera de Afghanistan! There's an end of it! NATO troups out of Afghanistan! Schluss jetzt endlich! NATO raus aus Afghanistan! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 08:42:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68261065674 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:42:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDB38FC08 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:42:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1PkulS-0006I4-Fx>; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:42:06 +0100 Received: from e178021119.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.21.119] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1PkulS-0007Wa-D8>; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:42:06 +0100 Message-ID: <4D4A6A5E.7030408@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:42:06 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110129 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anonymous References: <4D491AB4.7090700@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <8662t2okjv.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8662t2okjv.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.21.119 Cc: "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: editors/openoffice-org-3.3.0: serious issue with X11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 08:42:07 -0000 On 02/02/11 10:25, Anonymous wrote: > "O. Hartmann" writes: > >> Hello. >> I just upgraded openoffice-3.2.1 to openoffice-org-3.3.0 and found >> myself in a serious issue. Opening openoffice works only sporadically, >> in most cases I get the error: >> >> XDM authorization key matches an existing >> client!/usr/local/openoffice.org-3.3.0/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin >> X11 error: Can't open display: >> Set DISPLAY environment variable, use -display option >> or check permissions of your X-Server >> (See "man X" resp. "man xhost" for details) > > Have you tried to add the following to xdm-config > > DisplayManager*authName: MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 > > or adjusting permissions using xhost(1)? I did. Adding DisplayManager*authName: MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 to xdm-config didn't make the problem disappear, only a global 'xhost +' helped. I also tried xhost + localhost:0.0 and all IP- or name-based combinations even FQDN/IP of the host, without success, except pure 'xhost +'. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 09:33:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324C8106564A for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:33:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sir_dog@onet.com.ua) Received: from mail.noname.com.ua (mail.sphere.kharkov.com [193.33.48.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F288FC08 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.noname.com.ua (Postfix, from userid 8) id 4ADD71160E68; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:14:15 +0200 (EET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1-gr1 (2007-05-02) on ginger.airbites.kh.ua X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.1-gr1 Received: from mail.noname.com.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.noname.com.ua (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624631160E6B for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:14:14 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail.noname.com.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.noname.com.ua (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037191160E68; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:14:14 +0200 (EET) Received: from 212.1.112.9 (SquirrelMail authenticated user sir_dog@onet.com.ua) by mail.airbites.kh.ua with HTTP; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:14:14 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <50051.212.1.112.9.1296724454.squirrel@mail.airbites.kh.ua> In-Reply-To: <4D4A6A5E.7030408@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <4D491AB4.7090700@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <8662t2okjv.fsf@gmail.com> <4D4A6A5E.7030408@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:14:14 +0200 (EET) From: "Pavlo Greenberg" To: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.10a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP (mail.noname.com.ua) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: editors/openoffice-org-3.3.0: serious issue with X11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:33:59 -0000 > On 02/02/11 10:25, Anonymous wrote: >> "O. Hartmann" writes: >> >>> Hello. >>> I just upgraded openoffice-3.2.1 to openoffice-org-3.3.0 and found >>> myself in a serious issue. Opening openoffice works only sporadically, >>> in most cases I get the error: >>> >>> XDM authorization key matches an existing >>> client!/usr/local/openoffice.org-3.3.0/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin >>> X11 error: Can't open display: >>> Set DISPLAY environment variable, use -display option >>> or check permissions of your X-Server >>> (See "man X" resp. "man xhost" for details) >> >> Have you tried to add the following to xdm-config >> >> DisplayManager*authName: MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 >> >> or adjusting permissions using xhost(1)? > > I did. Adding DisplayManager*authName: MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 to xdm-config > didn't make the problem disappear, only a global 'xhost +' helped. I > also tried xhost + localhost:0.0 and all IP- or name-based combinations > even FQDN/IP of the host, without success, except pure 'xhost +'. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I solved the problem by adding "xhost +local:" in ~/.xsession (I don't use any DE anymore, just WM, so in case of KDE or GNOME it may be another config file). But I'm agree with you, OOo's behavior after the last update is abnormal. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 10:32:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C70A1065674 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:32:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailtrap@401.cx) Received: from mailscan.gavlenet.com (shire.gavlenet.com [IPv6:2001:b48::25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B538FC0C for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:32:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.222] (unknown [213.141.83.3]) by mailscan.gavlenet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37C7E7E29D for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:32:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4D4A843B.9090100@401.cx> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 11:32:27 +0100 From: mailtrap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gavlenet-MailScanner-ID: D37C7E7E29D.C89DC X-Gavlenet-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Gavlenet-MailScanner-From: mailtrap@401.cx X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Subject: FreeBSD on Dell r210 (SAS 6/ir) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 10:32:36 -0000 Hi list. We are looking for a small, cheap, decent performing 19" server to run FreeBSD or possibly FreeNAS, and found the Dell R210 which suits our needs perfectly. However, a lot of people seem to have problems with the SAS 6/ir controller under FreeBSD. According to what I've found on Google, it works, but the performance is horrible. This is a complete showstopper in this case, since the plan was to use the servers as offsite storagenodes. Does anyone have firsthand experience with the SAS 6/ir, or the PERC S100 in the somewhat more expensive Xeon version of the R210? Or does anyone know of another server with similar size, that is 19" wide and only ~40 cm deep? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 10:47:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F73D106566B for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:47:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19498FC16 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p13AlQex020535; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:47:28 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <4D4A87BE.5080805@qeng-ho.org> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 10:47:26 +0000 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101218 Thunderbird/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mailinglistmember@mgwigglesworth.net References: <4D4A39C8.2030305@mgwigglesworth.net> In-Reply-To: <4D4A39C8.2030305@mgwigglesworth.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CF-Card Install for post FBSD-8.x systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 10:47:31 -0000 On 02/03/11 05:14, Martes G Wigglesworth wrote: > Does anyone know what the new "minimal" install size is? Minimal, no, but a recent thread about DruidBSD (a rescue system) said that the whole lot was 24 MB, so that gives you an upper limit. > I remember running across a blurb about FBSD-7 and above require more > space and supposedly won't fit on less than 512MB or something like that. > > What are these specs? > > And I feel like I should still be able to product an 8-20MB image for an > embedded firewall/network appliance. > > I am attempting to port my firewall and vpn appliance to a CF-Card, or > to the user-loadable flash on this old PIII motherboard which runs this > system. > > I am having a bit of a time locating information in reference to this > task, which does not reference 4.x and netbsd. Have you looked at man 8 nanobsd? Intended to deal with just this sort of use. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 10:51:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF35106564A for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:51:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from axelbsd@ymail.com) Received: from nm15.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (nm15.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.146.183.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 736748FC1F for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:51:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [217.146.183.183] by nm15.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Feb 2011 10:51:24 -0000 Received: from [77.238.184.77] by tm14.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Feb 2011 10:51:24 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp146.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Feb 2011 10:51:24 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1296730284; bh=qr3Gvx1+38JrDQKh6rnwQ5ZF61W8w62h2kZSWpFGxUs=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:Received:MIME-Version:Received:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=kwaz/w1wwj5nJT7INbMp6Xx6pYqdmfK9serW9T0fOp38FuzwR2KEmZ0JwwcCL7QCbmZ7CbBDvkjCFz2cgeNUR7NyitON5TYrqlNqDdrQN6uDabz0SXLcTraazk24I+pTr3rU+kpslPHdCbe06O4K4q3pMR6JeTqNWbBX3/fRGzY= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 520296.50927.bm@smtp146.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (axelbsd@74.125.82.50 with plain) by smtp146.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 03 Feb 2011 10:51:24 +0000 GMT X-Yahoo-SMTP: S65s63SswBDjU54Gjqw2GSWlZmfgiEU_X3tN1_9u X-YMail-OSG: CsejFZUVM1nZa4oxkn0os5fIKMR9hZF0se6B4QcfTETm_nW cWTQIhZ78o3Sn5BL.Mkf.o.6G0NvpK69t3th64Lq9ZdGQtbfHzZvi6LdEcGk isH2KDnBKKqiEplTj9P0DrZu6rk_3ApUZrODM5tcROJKweQT1b2kmP9WcIjz zHZTSwRzXDDjtpH_7dtCMaiHEyVRxiT3fRlxtCDg_wNiStvQcKu1bSGriKiV rVsLnsDXMH5BultyLxWvTh4cUeGfbEgubcXkeLw-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so974495wwf.31 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 02:51:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.143.138 with SMTP id v10mr10495599wbu.24.1296730283977; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 02:51:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.154.144 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 02:51:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50051.212.1.112.9.1296724454.squirrel@mail.airbites.kh.ua> References: <4D491AB4.7090700@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <8662t2okjv.fsf@gmail.com> <4D4A6A5E.7030408@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <50051.212.1.112.9.1296724454.squirrel@mail.airbites.kh.ua> From: Alexandre Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:51:03 +0100 Message-ID: To: Pavlo Greenberg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: editors/openoffice-org-3.3.0: serious issue with X11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 10:51:26 -0000 On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Pavlo Greenberg wrote: > [SNIP] > But I'm agree with you, OOo's behavior after the last update is abnormal. Why not give a try to LibreOffice, that is in ports : http://www.freshports.org/editors/libreoffice/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 12:22:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E222F1065670 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 12:22:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grullonbb@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8424C8FC12 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 12:22:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws9 with SMTP id 9so580822vws.13 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 04:21:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=xIW/u4fQn5dlcIFjdzkM+NyfZgRtWSezh6FdHp0Bnkg=; b=LGjgPLJPXM03AizdzoLpxLtTzmeD4RL3krgLWaNYyXMjWwGzx8yrP1/aoZBkYoxbxG q9BWt/wOp+/9isoYVZTDYULlACJiHfc+QI8UQOINXE/NBGgRdJF03Y5qONOn26H2Nuiq 712zA7SaOU6uFHJn7FFQLR7v3hc1tu9TKmUCo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=HnL9+7j78QUpqEpnY3fp1D9HqeFicg3iwI99NpRgoDBudICuJuV2fCdSNLCqep4BPO 3Y3gRf4mXtyyXh0gEvcV6vP0zT92XhXQOn0ZO4WZk/MCeWwbse+KkLtYEJaws/4W1xVR +MenFlrBpXeYMpULa3rvJm4lpHDnY2T5hwxFU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.175.134 with SMTP id ba6mr2703424vcb.86.1296735719743; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 04:21:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.183.9 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 04:21:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D498736.4080909@ifdnrg.com> References: <4D498736.4080909@ifdnrg.com> Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:21:59 -0500 Message-ID: From: Lisandro Grullon To: Paul Macdonald Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: default route desappear. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:22:01 -0000 That's clever but I mean is this normal behavior with netif, have never seem this before in other *nix base systems. Thanks for the tip. I'll keep it on my belt now. Lisandro On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Paul Macdonald wrote: > On 02/02/2011 15:44, Lisandro Grullon wrote: > >> Dear list, >> I have been doing some remote work using ssh and BPF. From time to time I >> feel like restarting /etc/rc.d/netif using a static configuration and >> noticed that my default route gets delete even when I have everything se >> as >> static under /etc/rc.conf. The only way I can get my default route back is >> by restarting /etc/rc.d/routing which is uncomfortable besides doing the >> manual route add default xx.xx.xx.xx. Why is this behavior happening when >> rc.conf has the propoer setting for defaultrouter? Thank you ina dvance. >> Lisandro >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > I do /etc/rc.d/netif restart && /etc/rc.d/routing restart > > then you don't need to manually add the route again > > -- > ------------------------- > Paul Macdonald > IFDNRG Ltd > Web and video hosting > ------------------------- > t: 0131 5548070 > m: 07534206249 > e: paul@ifdnrg.com > w: http://www.ifdnrg.com > ------------------------- > IFDNRG > 40 Maritime Street > Edinburgh > EH6 6SA > ------------------------- > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 13:12:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF11106564A for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:12:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670538FC0C for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.37]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2011 08:12:55 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id ASF16079; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:12:54 -0500 Received: from 209-6-91-204.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.91.204]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2011 08:12:54 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19786.43478.21177.288707@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:12:54 -0500 To: Alexandre In-Reply-To: References: <4D491AB4.7090700@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <8662t2okjv.fsf@gmail.com> <4D4A6A5E.7030408@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <50051.212.1.112.9.1296724454.squirrel@mail.airbites.kh.ua> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Pavlo Greenberg , "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: editors/openoffice-org-3.3.0: serious issue with X11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:12:56 -0000 Alexandre writes: > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Pavlo Greenberg wrote: > > > [SNIP] > > But I'm agree with you, OOo's behavior after the last update is abnormal. > > Why not give a try to LibreOffice, that is in ports : > http://www.freshports.org/editors/libreoffice/ I switched yesterday, having not known it was available. It seems to work on all OOo-generated material (as one would expect), and build cleanly and (subjectively) somewhat faster than OO. (This is on an 4x3ghz amd64 machine with 8 gb of memory.) Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 14:35:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49FC106564A for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 14:35:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi.sergio@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2D88FC15 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 14:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywp6 with SMTP id 6so504869ywp.13 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 06:35:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references :content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=LV2yQZO1gKdZKFzlF636O/bPDfVGNy9BJtUIDUkGUbg=; b=YOcJkshOyIwQxHxp4CLtzjPcDHtc+T4IwBLGD0tyteHDcWGCi4QtIveDAsxWDeZVL0 IQYbby1Dk3smQvZFVer9ECnoVP2vbBggJC0dml7zKEdvsxKxmy6fGl46rmsenOrQuCm0 z3hrxpGR6/o9O5cG06peY+YUCJ6YF6MGb1Yvk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=IRK7PMAB0I51zmHI447T1lWZYiV5whKuYm2ddzbuwis+Hqu3hg74RGtbRGEBzqRsD8 r1697COVmgwExPyDWs+lIGhm3Cww428hlvgTrB9Ts37xYX4b2Bmwfe2LDKJdlojZAmsW HyNYOlI4MZiG4u88MGOczXsaRC7XlbN3HRUiM= Received: by 10.151.86.13 with SMTP id o13mr12652793ybl.392.1296743715752; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 06:35:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.6.230] ([201.21.166.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k1sm365500ybj.0.2011.02.03.06.35.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 03 Feb 2011 06:35:14 -0800 (PST) From: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi To: mailtrap In-Reply-To: <4D4A843B.9090100@401.cx> References: <4D4A843B.9090100@401.cx> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:35:10 -0200 Message-ID: <1296743711.30294.5.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Dell r210 (SAS 6/ir) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:35:16 -0000 Hello, I have a dell with 2 dual xeon 6 cores, dual thread cpus (24 logical cpus) with that famous perc6 controller, running FreeBSD 8.2 and with journaling FS (one partition) and 2 SAS drivers of 160GB. The controller blocks almost all the time.. message is timeout..... I used the mfi config utility (in the ports) and enable write cache. it now works ok (no more timeouts) but sometimes (once a week) it panics the system. A fix in the gjournal appears today (cvsup) and I hope it can fix the problem... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 16:10:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439F61065698 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:10:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsduser@paradisegreen.co.uk) Received: from mail.paradisegreen.co.uk (almaz.paradisegreen.co.uk [81.187.228.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB2B8FC0A for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:10:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (cpc1-hudd10-0-0-cust784.4-1.cable.virginmedia.com [86.3.71.17]) by mail.paradisegreen.co.uk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id p13FrC8N061603; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 15:53:14 GMT (envelope-from freebsduser@paradisegreen.co.uk) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=default; d=paradisegreen.co.uk; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pDmOLzLkZkFEFgIswTWsOpbAqDymlkvvziLnUP+1E+E/mfq/xZ/KWa1vjff1WqUGs zBv4h1Z0D8AKluG7w6hCQ== Message-ID: <4D4ACF69.8090808@paradisegreen.co.uk> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:53:13 +0000 From: Thomas Sandford User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VERIFIED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on almaz.paradisegreen.co.uk Cc: pepe Subject: Re: ipv6 problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:10:23 -0000 On 01/02/2011 07:29, pepe wrote: > I have 2001:14b8:10:402::/64 ipv6 from my isp and I cant get it working. > Ifconfig should be ok: > backup# ifconfig rl0 inet6 > > rl0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=8 > inet6 2001:14b8:10:402:2::1 prefixlen 64 Looks a bit odd - I would expect to see a link-local address too - eg %ifconfig bge0 inet6 bge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8009b inet6 fe80::20b:cdff:fef2:9a57%bge0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet6 2001:8b0:cae3:1:20b:cdff:fef2:9a57 prefixlen 64 autoconf > default gateway is set to 2001:14b8:10:402:1::1. That sounds a slightly odd comment, since in general IPv6 routing is done with auto-discovery. Especially given the fact that the default route quoted lies within the same subnet (2001:14b8:10:402:: prefixlen 64) as the host in question. When I try to traceroute > irc server for example > I get this: > > traceroute6: Warning: irc.cc.tut.fi has multiple addresses; using > 2001:708:310:4952:4320:5365:7276:6572 I get this message too - because the host irc.cc.tut.fi DOES have multiple addresses: %dig irc.cc.tut.fi aaaa ; <<>> DiG 9.6.2-P2 <<>> irc.cc.tut.fi aaaa ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 24710 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;irc.cc.tut.fi. IN AAAA ;; ANSWER SECTION: irc.cc.tut.fi. 3134 IN AAAA 2001:708:310:4952:4320:5365:7276:6572 irc.cc.tut.fi. 3134 IN AAAA 2001:708:310:4952:4320:436c:6965:6e74 ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: cc.tut.fi. 172334 IN NS ns-secondary.funet.fi. cc.tut.fi. 172334 IN NS kaustinen.cc.tut.fi. cc.tut.fi. 172334 IN NS ressu.cc.tut.fi. ;; Query time: 0 msec ;; SERVER: 81.187.228.6#53(81.187.228.6) ;; WHEN: Thu Feb 3 15:34:06 2011 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 164 > traceroute6 to irc.cc.tut.fi (2001:708:310:4952:4320:5365:7276:6572) from > 2001:14b8:10:402:2::1, 64 hops max, 12 byte packets > 1 2001:14b8:10:402:2::1 2026.908 ms !A 2999.587 ms !A 3000.423 ms !A From the traceroute6 manpage !A Destination Unreachable - Address Unreachable. It also appears that your first hop address is the same as your source address, which does suggest that routing is more than a little bit screwy. On my system I get: %traceroute6 -n irc.cc.tut.fi traceroute6: Warning: irc.cc.tut.fi has multiple addresses; using 2001:708:310:4952:4320:436c:6965:6e74 traceroute6 to irc.cc.tut.fi (2001:708:310:4952:4320:436c:6965:6e74) from 2001:8b0:cae3:1:20b:cdff:fef2:9a57, 64 hops max, 12 byte packets 1 2001:8b0:cae3:1:21a:a2ff:fe34:e50b 1.349 ms 0.969 ms 1.011 ms 2 2001:8b0:0:53:203:97ff:fe05:8000 129.118 ms 143.449 ms 119.622 ms 3 2001:7f8:4::50e8:1 132.075 ms 119.009 ms 117.983 ms 4 2001:7f8:4::1b1b:1 123.832 ms 114.424 ms 119.675 ms 5 2001:7f8:4::a2b:1 114.905 ms 119.009 ms 118.030 ms 6 2001:948:1:8::3 134.205 ms 143.579 ms 130.875 ms 7 2001:948:1:2::3 145.068 ms 145.049 ms 156.321 ms 8 2001:948:3:2::3 165.258 ms 171.228 ms 156.591 ms 9 2001:708:0:f000:0:60:3060:2 233.114 ms 163.319 ms 158.668 ms 10 2001:708:310::2 67.252 ms 58.513 ms 59.656 ms 11 2001:708:310:4952:4320:436c:6965:6e74 58.906 ms 58.310 ms 58.045 ms (I ran it with -n as I think in this case the raw IPv6 addresses are more informative than the rDNS lookups). > So. Could this be problem in my configs or is this because of something > wrong at the isp side? It does look as though there is something a little odd with your configs. It's difficult to be more specific because you've given very little information. If things at the router (whether yours or at the isp) are set up correctly then the single line in /etc/rc.conf ipv6_enable="YES" should be sufficient to autoconfigure BOTH ipv6 address and routing using Router Discovery. This is all that I had to do on the machine I generated the above config dumps & traces from. In my case my ISP (AAISP in the UK) have allocated me a /48 2001:8b0:cae3:: Traffic comes to me over a 6to4 tunnel from the ISP terminated on a Cisco router (though I tested it on a FreeBSD host before I got the 6to4 tunnel set up on the router). The LAN side interface of the router has Router Advertisements enabled which means that the above rc.conf line is all that is required for everything to "just work". -- Thomas Sandford From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 17:21:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C863A1065670 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:21:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DAD88FC13 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:21:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1Pl2sB-0004vc-NE>; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:21:35 +0100 Received: from telesto.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.198]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1Pl2sB-0000EM-LF>; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:21:35 +0100 Message-ID: <4D4AE421.4040807@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:21:37 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" Organization: Freie =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Universit=E4t_Berlin?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101210 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexandre References: <4D491AB4.7090700@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <8662t2okjv.fsf@gmail.com> <4D4A6A5E.7030408@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <50051.212.1.112.9.1296724454.squirrel@mail.airbites.kh.ua> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.198 Cc: Pavlo Greenberg , "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: editors/openoffice-org-3.3.0: serious issue with X11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:21:37 -0000 On 02/03/11 11:51, Alexandre wrote: > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Pavlo Greenberg > wrote: > > [SNIP] > But I'm agree with you, OOo's behavior after the last update is > abnormal. > > Why not give a try to LibreOffice, that is in ports :=C2 > http://www.freshports.org/editors/libreoffice/ I'll try, but when I installed/updated OO, I explicitely looked for=20 LibreOffice (that was a couple of days ago, when OO 3.3.0 got into the=20 ports), but it wasn't there. I'll try. Thanks for that hint. Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 17:30:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F3D106564A for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:30:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plaine@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348A68FC1A for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:30:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so1395458wyf.13 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:30:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SrOtHDOQQXIIGVvLPxX4FeP8unTEi4cSwgsznN+VQmM=; b=sP9/w0SuprQ0CZFN4r2pdrCvZuIoemEMRycsK2dwl+nL6nW+3wP/tKjqdCgtHpvo78 L9xGzclSYQYL8UyhCnvROUz1gnj0iJx+U+Ei7wFEFyUKkUCMkTp8QLiSAgkoIJwYsBYc EN43wRFL54HpsyWR0i4sd2tsMbvUcF49u4Q7E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dd0qfOA5rQFe5eTb/NwtwqjmHSVUk+2YCf/BBTzdHvtQ2jrZ92uuzCn3KGAd1M73qG SyHY8oZPcKITFJkHVQwlxEyY+coxtLrhBtV+yiZAAjLqVrkZkRMK4xK/UHYBfnXTDjSD 2tmxE2q9ybnBPDipXiXWe+gGttQAhSaf01k60= Received: by 10.227.181.138 with SMTP id by10mr10918506wbb.216.1296754256715; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:30:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.30] (78-27-68-136.bb.dnainternet.fi [78.27.68.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w25sm755357wbd.23.2011.02.03.09.30.54 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:30:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D4AE64E.8020205@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 19:30:54 +0200 From: pepe User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4D4ACF69.8090808@paradisegreen.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4D4ACF69.8090808@paradisegreen.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ipv6 problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:30:58 -0000 On 3.2.2011 17:53, Thomas Sandford wrote: > On 01/02/2011 07:29, pepe wrote: >> I have 2001:14b8:10:402::/64 ipv6 from my isp and I cant get it working. >> Ifconfig should be ok: >> backup# ifconfig rl0 inet6 >> >> rl0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 >> options=8 >> inet6 2001:14b8:10:402:2::1 prefixlen 64 > > Looks a bit odd - I would expect to see a link-local address too - eg > > %ifconfig bge0 inet6 > bge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > > options=8009b > inet6 fe80::20b:cdff:fef2:9a57%bge0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > inet6 2001:8b0:cae3:1:20b:cdff:fef2:9a57 prefixlen 64 autoconf > >> default gateway is set to 2001:14b8:10:402:1::1. > > That sounds a slightly odd comment, since in general IPv6 routing is > done with auto-discovery. Especially given the fact that the default > route quoted lies within the same subnet (2001:14b8:10:402:: prefixlen > 64) as the host in question. > > When I try to traceroute >> irc server for example >> I get this: >> >> traceroute6: Warning: irc.cc.tut.fi has multiple addresses; using >> 2001:708:310:4952:4320:5365:7276:6572 > > I get this message too - because the host irc.cc.tut.fi DOES have > multiple addresses: > > %dig irc.cc.tut.fi aaaa > > ; <<>> DiG 9.6.2-P2 <<>> irc.cc.tut.fi aaaa > ;; global options: +cmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 24710 > ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 0 > > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;irc.cc.tut.fi. IN AAAA > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > irc.cc.tut.fi. 3134 IN AAAA 2001:708:310:4952:4320:5365:7276:6572 > irc.cc.tut.fi. 3134 IN AAAA 2001:708:310:4952:4320:436c:6965:6e74 > > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: > cc.tut.fi. 172334 IN NS ns-secondary.funet.fi. > cc.tut.fi. 172334 IN NS kaustinen.cc.tut.fi. > cc.tut.fi. 172334 IN NS ressu.cc.tut.fi. > > ;; Query time: 0 msec > ;; SERVER: 81.187.228.6#53(81.187.228.6) > ;; WHEN: Thu Feb 3 15:34:06 2011 > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 164 > > >> traceroute6 to irc.cc.tut.fi (2001:708:310:4952:4320:5365:7276:6572) from >> 2001:14b8:10:402:2::1, 64 hops max, 12 byte packets >> 1 2001:14b8:10:402:2::1 2026.908 ms !A 2999.587 ms !A 3000.423 ms !A > > From the traceroute6 manpage > !A Destination Unreachable - Address Unreachable. > > It also appears that your first hop address is the same as your source > address, which does suggest that routing is more than a little bit screwy. > > On my system I get: > > %traceroute6 -n irc.cc.tut.fi > traceroute6: Warning: irc.cc.tut.fi has multiple addresses; using > 2001:708:310:4952:4320:436c:6965:6e74 > traceroute6 to irc.cc.tut.fi (2001:708:310:4952:4320:436c:6965:6e74) > from 2001:8b0:cae3:1:20b:cdff:fef2:9a57, 64 hops max, 12 byte packets > 1 2001:8b0:cae3:1:21a:a2ff:fe34:e50b 1.349 ms 0.969 ms 1.011 ms > 2 2001:8b0:0:53:203:97ff:fe05:8000 129.118 ms 143.449 ms 119.622 ms > 3 2001:7f8:4::50e8:1 132.075 ms 119.009 ms 117.983 ms > 4 2001:7f8:4::1b1b:1 123.832 ms 114.424 ms 119.675 ms > 5 2001:7f8:4::a2b:1 114.905 ms 119.009 ms 118.030 ms > 6 2001:948:1:8::3 134.205 ms 143.579 ms 130.875 ms > 7 2001:948:1:2::3 145.068 ms 145.049 ms 156.321 ms > 8 2001:948:3:2::3 165.258 ms 171.228 ms 156.591 ms > 9 2001:708:0:f000:0:60:3060:2 233.114 ms 163.319 ms 158.668 ms > 10 2001:708:310::2 67.252 ms 58.513 ms 59.656 ms > 11 2001:708:310:4952:4320:436c:6965:6e74 58.906 ms 58.310 ms 58.045 ms > > (I ran it with -n as I think in this case the raw IPv6 addresses are > more informative than the rDNS lookups). > >> So. Could this be problem in my configs or is this because of something >> wrong at the isp side? > > It does look as though there is something a little odd with your > configs. It's difficult to be more specific because you've given very > little information. > > If things at the router (whether yours or at the isp) are set up > correctly then the single line in /etc/rc.conf > > ipv6_enable="YES" > > should be sufficient to autoconfigure BOTH ipv6 address and routing > using Router Discovery. This is all that I had to do on the machine I > generated the above config dumps & traces from. > > In my case my ISP (AAISP in the UK) have allocated me a /48 2001:8b0:cae3:: > > Traffic comes to me over a 6to4 tunnel from the ISP terminated on a > Cisco router (though I tested it on a FreeBSD host before I got the 6to4 > tunnel set up on the router). The LAN side interface of the router has > Router Advertisements enabled which means that the above rc.conf line is > all that is required for everything to "just work". > This one got solved at freebsd-net already with more information about my configs and system... It is problem at isp side instead of my configs... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 18:08:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62BAE106566B for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 18:08:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jan0sch@gmx.net) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BCE668FC14 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 18:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Feb 2011 18:08:56 -0000 Received: from dslb-088-072-235-173.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO magni) [88.72.235.173] by mail.gmx.net (mp063) with SMTP; 03 Feb 2011 19:08:56 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1545395 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18Ev7Mxd2oEI6EEyo1JDO5jM/HtUo8Z4ItTJZTG3O jlPGMTYWUUi8ep Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:08:26 +0100 From: Jens Jahnke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20110203190826.697a87ff.jan0sch@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20110203065059.GA76783@current.Sisis.de> References: <20110203071910.bdfa18e0.jan0sch@gmx.net> <20110203065059.GA76783@current.Sisis.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.3 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) X-Face: &?!P`87-36gaG)/K:yi&ixw=uy]y'?$vrc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA512"; boundary="Signature=_Thu__3_Feb_2011_19_08_26_+0100_p7S8MMv5U+P5_D4z" X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: Experience with o2 surf stick X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:08:59 -0000 --Signature=_Thu__3_Feb_2011_19_08_26_+0100_p7S8MMv5U+P5_D4z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:50:59 +0100 Matthias Apitz wrote: MA> Hello Jens, MA>=20 MA> "surf stick" is marketing speech and you never know what the ship MA> today below this label and tomorrow, I think. You should convince MA> them and plug it in and see what appears in /var/log/messages, i.e. MA> what vendor and product ID it is. thanks for the tip. I'll try that. :) Regards, Jens --=20 03. Hornung 2011, 19:07 Homepage : http://www.jan0sch.de If you don't do the things that are not worth doing, who will? --Signature=_Thu__3_Feb_2011_19_08_26_+0100_p7S8MMv5U+P5_D4z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iQG8BAEBCgAGBQJNSu8tAAoJED2+SXzzbciGx+oNAIeZWgkSM3kkFtCoZFv/P3Lb 9CEEe22won6QPSHdN/dgSy3ukWLnqm8YOcoGerxJu67aROxI8tXMnAGAUDUdKXuC IMYNTX1GS+UfuULrMwuWBZXJl09GIO3IgZ4DUdjeTRK5FFATfgittRdT5UoyyHzn EsB3GQxDcpQCte9fiweKMvCOJSaT0bA8g5P7I21j4qQb4E0zndFL+kilRMFcCo1p FoRQyJ2c3MGVNy+h515JqJ8IjjDCq06gQTT0ViUxcbckhUbT9YAIi1JoKq2DX8wF 1TJlFvUAbmAYTSA6fRfEfUwndT7u0YsrKt2vAiDBO1HpzJT4SWdSoBFDEqRgPco7 hhV8f1lMsLVS/3CjmgRj8PKbSElbIkem2xBkFp+NRYeNK+yoTIdTA7X7UAxKCbnD 6AlFA0Rze56uInrZ8YgrGPFFhvar/XI1M0zQo6lhiiky5Pb6ovrtCUgGU06Cbp7j cjHcuRJOr+bQXfnoYcUBOAuzTdVqXfUfs5n1599ZBGYpGFIvrrpkJKOmSNgC4+4F FAx3IFRm+V/5FmbSufcX =xoKa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__3_Feb_2011_19_08_26_+0100_p7S8MMv5U+P5_D4z-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 18:18:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E68B106564A for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 18:18:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=0015394c74=kalts@estcard.ee) Received: from smtp.estcard.ee (smtp.estcard.ee [194.204.11.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6832C8FC0A for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 18:18:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fserv.internal ([192.168.10.3]) by smtp.estcard.ee with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.73) (envelope-from ) id 1Pl3Mn-0005M7-Ia; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 19:53:18 +0200 Received: from myhakas.internal ([192.168.21.128]) by fserv.internal with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pl3Mn-0006NN-Go; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 19:53:13 +0200 Received: from kalts by myhakas.internal with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pl3Mn-0006iU-Fy; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 19:53:13 +0200 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:53:13 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste To: Jan Henrik Sylvester Message-ID: <20110203175313.GA25099@hape.internal> References: <20110131154759.GA17485@hape.internal> <4D46E6A8.8040408@janh.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D46E6A8.8040408@janh.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: questions-list freebsd Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.2: state of Kerberos, GSS-API and (Cyrus) SASL? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalts@estpak.ee List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:18:38 -0000 On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 05:43:20PM +0100, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > GSSAPI of Heimdal 1.1 in FreeBSD base is still broken, GSSAPI of > Heimdal 1.4 in ports is supposed to work, but I have not been > successful with Cyrus SASL (see below). > > >KDC up and working on 8.2-RC2 base Heimdal without any glitch, but > >this is to be expected. What's the state about GSS-API and > >cyrus-sasl2 integration with base Heimdal? With ports Heimdal? Can I > >replace base Heimdal with one from ports, is it supported? Any > >make.conf knobs to fiddle with? Any info appreciated. > > I am struggling with exactly the same problem. Unfortunately, I got > no reply on this list about it: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2011-January/226495.html > > If you get any further, please, tell me. I am thinking about > reposting my question to a different list: stable as that is where > the earlier discussions happened or ports as that seems more > appropriate. > > What I have not tried, yet, is using MIT Kerberos from ports instead > of Heimdal, but since we use Heimdal here for everything, I am kind > of reluctant. (Otherwise, I would have to setup some Linux > server...) > This is what I have done so far. I used the patches from http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/152030 and instructions from http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?23,1289579281,newer As a side remark, no matter how I try this freebsd-questions thread will not show up by using the search engine: http://www.freebsd.org/search/search.html#mailinglists After installing 8.2-RC2 I csup'ed RELENG_8 sources and fresh port tree, built and installed new world by using the instructions in the handbook. With new kernel, mergemaster x2 and all that stuff. Then I set WITHOUT_KERBEROS=1 in /etc/src.conf and repeated build-installworld. After completing and reboot I hunted down as much base Heimdal bits as I could and sent 'em to binary heaven: /usr/include: asn1_err.h heim_asn1.h cms_asn1.h rfc2459_asn1.h krb5_asn1.h pkinit_asn1.h pkcs8_asn1.h pkcs9_asn1.h pkcs12_asn1.h digest_asn1.h kx509_asn1.h hdb-private.h hdb-protos.h hdb.h hdb_asn1.h hdb_err.h heimntlm.h heimntlm-protos.h hx509-private.h hx509-protos.h hx509.h hx509_err.h ocsp_asn1.h pkcs10_asn1.h kafs.h heim_err.h heim_threads.h k524_err.h krb5-protos.h krb5-types.h krb5.h krb5_err.h krb5-v4compat.h krb_err.h roken.h roken-common.h gssapi.h kadm5/ gssapi/ /usr/lib: libroken.a libroken.so libroken.so.10 libroken_p.a libkadm5srv.a libkadm5srv.so libkadm5srv.so.10 libkadm5srv_p.a libkafs5.a libkafs5.so libkafs5.so.10 libkafs5_p.a libkrb5.a libkrb5.so libkrb5.so.10 libkrb5_p.a libgssapi_krb5.a libgssapi_krb5.so libgssapi_krb5.so.10 libgssapi_krb5_p.a libgssapi_ntlm.a libgssapi_ntlm.so libgssapi_ntlm.so.10 libgssapi_ntlm_p.a libgssapi_spnego.a libgssapi_spnego.so libgssapi_spnego.so.10 libgssapi_spnego_p.a libhdb.a libhdb.so libhdb.so.10 libhdb_p.a libheimntlm.a libheimntlm.so libheimntlm.so.10 libheimntlm_p.a libhx509.a libhx509.so libhx509.so.10 libhx509_p.a libkadm5clnt.a libkadm5clnt.so libkadm5clnt.so.10 libkadm5clnt_p.a libasn1.a libasn1.so libasn1.so.10 libasn1_p.a pam_krb5.so pam_krb5.so.5 pam_ksu.so pam_ksu.so.5 libgssapi.a libgssapi.so libgssapi.so.10 libgssapi_p.a librpcsec_gss.a librpcsec_gss.so librpcsec_gss.so.1 /usr/share/man/man1: kdestroy.1.gz kinit.1.gz klist.1.gz kpasswd.1.gz krb5-config.1.gz /usr/share/man/man3: gssapi.3.gz gss_accept_sec_context.3.gz gss_acquire_cred.3.gz gss_add_cred.3.gz gss_add_oid_set_member.3.gz gss_canonicalize_name.3.gz gss_compare_name.3.gz gss_context_time.3.gz gss_create_empty_oid_set.3.gz gss_delete_sec_context.3.gz gss_display_name.3.gz gss_display_status.3.gz gss_duplicate_name.3.gz gss_export_name.3.gz gss_export_sec_context.3.gz gss_get_mic.3.gz gss_import_name.3.gz gss_import_sec_context.3.gz gss_indicate_mechs.3.gz gss_init_sec_context.3.gz gss_inquire_context.3.gz gss_inquire_cred.3.gz gss_inquire_cred_by_mech.3.gz gss_inquire_mechs_for_name.3.gz gss_inquire_names_for_mech.3.gz gss_process_context_token.3.gz gss_release_buffer.3.gz gss_release_cred.3.gz gss_release_name.3.gz gss_release_oid_set.3.gz gss_test_oid_set_member.3.gz gss_unwrap.3.gz gss_verify_mic.3.gz gss_wrap.3.gz gss_wrap_size_limit.3.gz gss_sign.3.gz gss_unseal.3.gz gss_verify.3.gz gss_seal.3.gz rpcsec_gss.3.gz rpc_gss_seccreate.3.gz rpc_gss_set_defaults.3.gz rpc_gss_max_data_length.3.gz rpc_gss_get_error.3.gz rpc_gss_mech_to_oid.3.gz rpc_gss_oid_to_mech.3.gz rpc_gss_qop_to_num.3.gz rpc_gss_get_mechanisms.3.gz rpc_gss_get_mech_info.3.gz rpc_gss_get_versions.3.gz rpc_gss_is_installed.3.gz rpc_gss_set_svc_name.3.gz rpc_gss_getcred.3.gz rpc_gss_set_callback.3.gz rpc_gss_get_principal_name.3.gz rpc_gss_svc_max_data_length.3.gz kafs5.3.gz k_afs_cell_of_file.3.gz k_hasafs.3.gz k_pioctl.3.gz k_setpag.3.gz k_unlog.3.gz kafs.3.gz kafs_set_verbose.3.gz kafs_settoken.3.gz kafs_settoken5.3.gz kafs_settoken_rxkad.3.gz krb5_afslog.3.gz krb5_afslog_uid.3.gz krb_afslog.3.gz krb_afslog_uid.3.gz krb5.3.gz krb524_convert_creds_kdc.3.gz krb5_425_conv_principal.3.gz krb5_acl_match_file.3.gz krb5_address.3.gz krb5_aname_to_localname.3.gz krb5_appdefault.3.gz krb5_auth_context.3.gz krb5_c_make_checksum.3.gz krb5_ccache.3.gz krb5_check_transited.3.gz krb5_compare_creds.3.gz krb5_config.3.gz krb5_context.3.gz krb5_create_checksum.3.gz krb5_creds.3.gz krb5_crypto_init.3.gz krb5_data.3.gz krb5_digest.3.gz krb5_eai_to_heim_errno.3.gz krb5_encrypt.3.gz krb5_expand_hostname.3.gz krb5_find_padata.3.gz krb5_generate_random_block.3.gz krb5_get_all_client_addrs.3.gz krb5_get_credentials.3.gz krb5_get_creds.3.gz krb5_get_forwarded_creds.3.gz krb5_get_in_cred.3.gz krb5_get_init_creds.3.gz krb5_get_krbhst.3.gz krb5_getportbyname.3.gz krb5_init_context.3.gz krb5_is_thread_safe.3.gz krb5_keyblock.3.gz krb5_keytab.3.gz krb5_krbhst_init.3.gz krb5_kuserok.3.gz krb5_mk_req.3.gz krb5_mk_safe.3.gz krb5_openlog.3.gz krb5_parse_name.3.gz krb5_principal.3.gz krb5_rcache.3.gz krb5_rd_error.3.gz krb5_rd_safe.3.gz krb5_set_default_realm.3.gz krb5_set_password.3.gz krb5_storage.3.gz krb5_string_to_key.3.gz krb5_ticket.3.gz krb5_timeofday.3.gz krb5_unparse_name.3.gz krb5_verify_init_creds.3.gz krb5_verify_user.3.gz krb5_warn.3.gz krb5_425_conv_principal_ext.3.gz krb5_524_conv_principal.3.gz krb5_addr2sockaddr.3.gz krb5_address_compare.3.gz krb5_address_order.3.gz krb5_address_search.3.gz krb5_addresses.3.gz krb5_anyaddr.3.gz krb5_append_addresses.3.gz krb5_copy_address.3.gz krb5_copy_addresses.3.gz krb5_free_address.3.gz krb5_free_addresses.3.gz krb5_h_addr2addr.3.gz krb5_h_addr2sockaddr.3.gz krb5_make_addrport.3.gz krb5_max_sockaddr_size.3.gz krb5_parse_address.3.gz krb5_print_address.3.gz krb5_sockaddr2address.3.gz krb5_sockaddr2port.3.gz krb5_sockaddr_uninteresting.3.gz krb5_appdefault_boolean.3.gz krb5_appdefault_string.3.gz krb5_appdefault_time.3.gz krb5_auth_con_free.3.gz krb5_auth_con_genaddrs.3.gz krb5_auth_con_getaddrs.3.gz krb5_auth_con_getflags.3.gz krb5_auth_con_getkey.3.gz krb5_auth_con_getlocalsubkey.3.gz krb5_auth_con_getrcache.3.gz krb5_auth_con_getremotesubkey.3.gz krb5_auth_con_getuserkey.3.gz krb5_auth_con_init.3.gz krb5_auth_con_initivector.3.gz krb5_auth_con_setaddrs.3.gz krb5_auth_con_setaddrs_from_fd.3.gz krb5_auth_con_setflags.3.gz krb5_auth_con_setivector.3.gz krb5_auth_con_setkey.3.gz krb5_auth_con_setlocalsubkey.3.gz krb5_auth_con_setrcache.3.gz krb5_auth_con_setremotesubkey.3.gz krb5_auth_con_setuserkey.3.gz krb5_auth_getauthenticator.3.gz krb5_auth_getcksumtype.3.gz krb5_auth_getkeytype.3.gz krb5_auth_getlocalseqnumber.3.gz krb5_auth_getremoteseqnumber.3.gz krb5_auth_setcksumtype.3.gz krb5_auth_setkeytype.3.gz krb5_auth_setlocalseqnumber.3.gz krb5_auth_setremoteseqnumber.3.gz krb5_cc_close.3.gz krb5_cc_copy_cache.3.gz krb5_cc_cursor.3.gz krb5_cc_default.3.gz krb5_cc_default_name.3.gz krb5_cc_destroy.3.gz krb5_cc_end_seq_get.3.gz krb5_cc_gen_new.3.gz krb5_cc_get_name.3.gz krb5_cc_get_ops.3.gz krb5_cc_get_principal.3.gz krb5_cc_get_type.3.gz krb5_cc_get_version.3.gz krb5_cc_initialize.3.gz krb5_cc_next_cred.3.gz krb5_cc_ops.3.gz krb5_cc_register.3.gz krb5_cc_remove_cred.3.gz krb5_cc_resolve.3.gz krb5_cc_retrieve_cred.3.gz krb5_cc_set_default_name.3.gz krb5_cc_set_flags.3.gz krb5_cc_store_cred.3.gz krb5_fcc_ops.3.gz krb5_mcc_ops.3.gz krb5_config_get_bool_default.3.gz krb5_config_get_int_default.3.gz krb5_config_get_string_default.3.gz krb5_config_get_time_default.3.gz krb5_checksum_is_collision_proof.3.gz krb5_checksum_is_keyed.3.gz krb5_checksumsize.3.gz krb5_verify_checksum.3.gz krb5_crypto_destroy.3.gz krb5_copy_data.3.gz krb5_data_alloc.3.gz krb5_data_copy.3.gz krb5_data_free.3.gz krb5_data_realloc.3.gz krb5_data_zero.3.gz krb5_free_data.3.gz krb5_free_data_contents.3.gz krb5_decrypt.3.gz krb5_decrypt_EncryptedData.3.gz krb5_encrypt_EncryptedData.3.gz krb5_get_all_server_addrs.3.gz krb5_free_krbhst.3.gz krb5_get_krb524hst.3.gz krb5_get_krb_admin_hst.3.gz krb5_get_krb_changepw_hst.3.gz krb5_free_context.3.gz krb5_keytab_entry.3.gz krb5_kt_add_entry.3.gz krb5_kt_close.3.gz krb5_kt_compare.3.gz krb5_kt_copy_entry_contents.3.gz krb5_kt_cursor.3.gz krb5_kt_default.3.gz krb5_kt_default_name.3.gz krb5_kt_end_seq_get.3.gz krb5_kt_free_entry.3.gz krb5_kt_get_entry.3.gz krb5_kt_get_name.3.gz krb5_kt_get_type.3.gz krb5_kt_next_entry.3.gz krb5_kt_ops.3.gz krb5_log.3.gz krb5_kt_read_service_key.3.gz krb5_kt_register.3.gz krb5_kt_remove_entry.3.gz krb5_kt_resolve.3.gz krb5_kt_start_seq_get.3.gz krb5_krbhst_format_string.3.gz krb5_krbhst_free.3.gz krb5_krbhst_get_addrinfo.3.gz krb5_krbhst_next.3.gz krb5_krbhst_next_as_string.3.gz krb5_krbhst_reset.3.gz krb5_addlog_dest.3.gz krb5_addlog_func.3.gz krb5_closelog.3.gz krb5_initlog.3.gz krb5_log_msg.3.gz krb5_vlog.3.gz krb5_vlog_msg.3.gz krb5_get_default_principal.3.gz krb5_build_principal.3.gz krb5_build_principal_ext.3.gz krb5_build_principal_va.3.gz krb5_build_principal_va_ext.3.gz krb5_copy_principal.3.gz krb5_free_principal.3.gz krb5_make_principal.3.gz krb5_parse_name_flags.3.gz krb5_parse_nametype.3.gz krb5_princ_realm.3.gz krb5_princ_set_realm.3.gz krb5_principal_compare.3.gz krb5_principal_compare_any_realm.3.gz krb5_principal_get_comp_string.3.gz krb5_principal_get_realm.3.gz krb5_principal_get_type.3.gz krb5_principal_match.3.gz krb5_principal_set_type.3.gz krb5_realm_compare.3.gz krb5_sname_to_principal.3.gz krb5_sock_to_principal.3.gz krb5_unparse_name_flags.3.gz krb5_unparse_name_fixed.3.gz krb5_unparse_name_fixed_flags.3.gz krb5_unparse_name_fixed_short.3.gz krb5_unparse_name_short.3.gz krb5_free_host_realm.3.gz krb5_get_default_realm.3.gz krb5_get_default_realms.3.gz krb5_get_host_realm.3.gz krb5_us_timeofday.3.gz krb5_verify_opt_init.3.gz krb5_verify_opt_set_flags.3.gz krb5_verify_opt_set_keytab.3.gz krb5_verify_opt_set_secure.3.gz krb5_verify_opt_set_service.3.gz krb5_verify_user_lrealm.3.gz krb5_verify_user_opt.3.gz krb5_err.3.gz krb5_errx.3.gz krb5_set_warn_dest.3.gz krb5_verr.3.gz krb5_verrx.3.gz krb5_vwarn.3.gz krb5_vwarnx.3.gz krb5_warnx.3.gz /usr/share/man/man5: krb5.conf.5.gz mech.5.gz qop.5.gz /usr/share/man/man8: gssd.8.gz kadmin.8.gz kstash.8.gz ktutil.8.gz verify_krb5_conf.8.gz hprop.8.gz hpropd.8.gz kadmind.8.gz kcm.8.gz kdc.8.gz kpasswdd.8.gz kerberos.8.gz pam_krb5.8.gz pam_ksu.8.gz /usr/bin: kadmin kdestroy kinit klist kpasswd krb5-config ksu verify_krb5_conf /usr/sbin: gssd kstash ktutil /usr/libexec: ipropd-master ipropd-slave hprop hpropd kadmind kdc kpasswdd kcm /usr/share/info: heimdal.info.gz /etc: gss/ (I let this be) Next step was to install security/heimdal port. The latest Heimdal port has capability to provide Kerberos for base system build. In other words the Heimdal port installed into /usr/local can replace base system Kerberos. After installing Heimdal port I patched base system sources with 8-STABLE patch provided by Joerg Pulz in PR ports/152030. Then set WITH_KERBEROS_PORT=1 (in addition to WITHOUT_KERBEROS=1) in src.conf, HEIMDAL_HOME=/usr/local in /etc/make.conf, then built and installed world. It worked well. But after installing security/cyrus-sasl2 the included pluginviewer told that GSSAPI isn't one of supported SASL mechanisms. Althought the /usr/local/lib/sasl2/libgssapiv2.so.2 module is present it will not be loaded and the errors can be seen in /var/log/messages: Feb 3 10:53:43 kdc2 server: unable to dlopen /usr/local/lib/sasl2/libgssapiv2.so.2: /usr/local/lib/sasl2/libgssapiv2.so.2: Undefined symbol "gss_nt_service_name" This can be cured by using yet another patch by Joerg Pulz in PR ports/152071. This did not apply cleanly and I did it by hand. The diff against cyrus-sasl-2.1.23.tar.gz distribution 'configure' follows, replace the security/cyrus-sasl2/files/patch-configure with this: ====================================================================== --- configure.dist 2011-02-03 18:17:18.000000000 +0200 +++ configure 2011-02-03 18:16:36.000000000 +0200 @@ -1586,6 +1586,7 @@ fi echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: yes" >&5 echo "${ECHO_T}yes" >&6 +program_prefix=NONE test "$program_prefix" != NONE && program_transform_name="s,^,$program_prefix,;$program_transform_name" # Use a double $ so make ignores it. @@ -5147,7 +5148,7 @@ fi saved_LIBS=$LIBS - for dbname in db-4.4 db4.4 db44 db-4.3 db4.3 db43 db-4.2 db4.2 db42 db-4.1 db4.1 db41 db-4.0 db4.0 db-4 db40 db4 db-3.3 db3.3 db33 db-3.2 db3.2 db32 db-3.1 db3.1 db31 db-3 db30 db3 db + for dbname in ${with_bdb} db-4.4 db4.4 db44 db-4.3 db4.3 db43 db-4.2 db4.2 db42 db-4.1 db4.1 db41 db-4.0 db4.0 db-4 db40 db4 db-3.3 db3.3 db33 db-3.2 db3.2 db32 db-3.1 db3.1 db31 db-3 db30 db3 db do LIBS="$saved_LIBS -l$dbname" cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF @@ -5157,6 +5158,7 @@ cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF /* end confdefs.h. */ +#include #include int main () @@ -5904,7 +5906,7 @@ fi saved_LIBS=$LIBS - for dbname in db-4.4 db4.4 db44 db-4.3 db4.3 db43 db-4.2 db4.2 db42 db-4.1 db4.1 db41 db-4.0 db4.0 db-4 db40 db4 db-3.3 db3.3 db33 db-3.2 db3.2 db32 db-3.1 db3.1 db31 db-3 db30 db3 db + for dbname in ${with_bdb} db-4.4 db4.4 db44 db-4.3 db4.3 db43 db-4.2 db4.2 db42 db-4.1 db4.1 db41 db-4.0 db4.0 db-4 db40 db4 db-3.3 db3.3 db33 db-3.2 db3.2 db32 db-3.1 db3.1 db31 db-3 db30 db3 db do LIBS="$saved_LIBS -l$dbname" cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF @@ -5914,6 +5916,7 @@ cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF /* end confdefs.h. */ +#include #include int main () @@ -7215,6 +7218,8 @@ SASLAUTHD_TRUE='#' SASLAUTHD_FALSE= fi +SASLAUTHD_TRUE='#' +SASLAUTHD_FALSE= echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking if I should include saslauthd" >&5 echo $ECHO_N "checking if I should include saslauthd... $ECHO_C" >&6 @@ -10672,7 +10677,7 @@ echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 else ac_check_lib_save_LIBS=$LIBS -LIBS="-lgssapi ${GSSAPIBASE_LIBS} -lgssapi -lkrb5 -lasn1 -lroken ${LIB_CRYPT} ${LIB_DES} -lcom_err ${LIB_SOCKET} $LIBS" +LIBS="${GSSAPIBASE_LIBS} `krb5-config --libs gssapi` $LIBS" cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF #line $LINENO "configure" /* confdefs.h. */ @@ -11082,7 +11087,7 @@ GSSAPIBASE_STATIC_LIBS="$GSSAPIBASE_LIBS $gssapi_dir/libgssapi_krb5.a $gssapi_dir/libkrb5.a $gssapi_dir/libk5crypto.a $gssapi_dir/libcom_err.a ${K5SUPSTATIC}" elif test "$gss_impl" = "heimdal"; then CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -DKRB5_HEIMDAL" - GSSAPIBASE_LIBS="$GSSAPIBASE_LIBS -lgssapi -lkrb5 -lasn1 -lroken ${LIB_CRYPT} ${LIB_DES} -lcom_err" + GSSAPIBASE_LIBS="$GSSAPIBASE_LIBS `krb5-config --libs gssapi`" GSSAPIBASE_STATIC_LIBS="$GSSAPIBASE_STATIC_LIBS $gssapi_dir/libgssapi.a $gssapi_dir/libkrb5.a $gssapi_dir/libasn1.a $gssapi_dir/libroken.a $gssapi_dir/libcom_err.a ${LIB_CRYPT}" elif test "$gss_impl" = "cybersafe03"; then # Version of CyberSafe with two libraries @@ -11119,7 +11124,7 @@ # in gssapi\rfckrb5.h # if test "$gssapi" != "no"; then - if test "$gss_impl" = "cybersafe" -o "$gss_impl" = "cybersafe03"; then + if test "$gss_impl" = "cybersafe" -o "$gss_impl" = "cybersafe03" -o "$gss_impl" = "heimdal"; then cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF #line $LINENO "configure" /* confdefs.h. */ @@ -11190,7 +11195,7 @@ fi - if test "$gss_impl" = "cybersafe" -o "$gss_impl" = "cybersafe03"; then + if test "$gss_impl" = "cybersafe" -o "$gss_impl" = "cybersafe03" -o "$gss_impl" = "heimdal"; then cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF #line $LINENO "configure" /* confdefs.h. */ @@ -11920,7 +11925,7 @@ echo $ECHO_N "(cached) $ECHO_C" >&6 else ac_check_lib_save_LIBS=$LIBS -LIBS="-lpq $LIBS" +LIBS="-lpq $GSSAPIBASE_LIBS $LIBS" cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF #line $LINENO "configure" /* confdefs.h. */ ====================================================================== After replacing the patch-configure install security/cyrus-sasl2 port and try out pluginviewer, in my case: [root@kdc2 ~]# pluginviewer -s Installed SASL (server side) mechanisms are: NTLM LOGIN ANONYMOUS PLAIN GSSAPI OTP DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 EXTERNAL List of server plugins follows Plugin "ntlm" [loaded], API version: 4 SASL mechanism: NTLM, best SSF: 0, supports setpass: no security flags: NO_ANONYMOUS|NO_PLAINTEXT features: WANT_CLIENT_FIRST Plugin "login" [loaded], API version: 4 SASL mechanism: LOGIN, best SSF: 0, supports setpass: no security flags: NO_ANONYMOUS features: Plugin "anonymous" [loaded], API version: 4 SASL mechanism: ANONYMOUS, best SSF: 0, supports setpass: no security flags: NO_PLAINTEXT features: WANT_CLIENT_FIRST Plugin "plain" [loaded], API version: 4 SASL mechanism: PLAIN, best SSF: 0, supports setpass: no security flags: NO_ANONYMOUS features: WANT_CLIENT_FIRST|PROXY_AUTHENTICATION Plugin "gssapiv2" [loaded], API version: 4 SASL mechanism: GSSAPI, best SSF: 56, supports setpass: no security flags: NO_ANONYMOUS|NO_PLAINTEXT|NO_ACTIVE|PASS_CREDENTIALS|MUTUAL_AUTH features: WANT_CLIENT_FIRST|PROXY_AUTHENTICATION Plugin "otp" [loaded], API version: 4 SASL mechanism: OTP, best SSF: 0, supports setpass: no security flags: NO_ANONYMOUS|NO_PLAINTEXT|FORWARD_SECRECY features: WANT_CLIENT_FIRST|PROXY_AUTHENTICATION Plugin "digestmd5" [loaded], API version: 4 SASL mechanism: DIGEST-MD5, best SSF: 128, supports setpass: no security flags: NO_ANONYMOUS|NO_PLAINTEXT|MUTUAL_AUTH features: PROXY_AUTHENTICATION Plugin "crammd5" [loaded], API version: 4 SASL mechanism: CRAM-MD5, best SSF: 0, supports setpass: no security flags: NO_ANONYMOUS|NO_PLAINTEXT features: SERVER_FIRST I have not tried yet to build and use apps which make use of Kerberos authentication via SASL, but clearly the first step is that pluginviewer must consider GSSAPI mechanism as worthy. My thanks go to Joerg Pulz who did all the heavy lifting and provided patches to the public. Thank you. -- Vallo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 19:25:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9E0106564A for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:25:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30898FC16 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so1508099wyf.13 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 11:25:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YfPSmJUDcCJ086PEOE4lEuevgvASOn0XKz74JWp4ivQ=; b=SZMrgNfmKDg09vzaOxebUfShDCqKa2Cm2QuZIzUCJicX4ei1AoMHhv5TQD6M6Ry0x5 msmU+gjjCR7K98McVvYPh08tmdvOMKxEhoK0zbTUSyZHxbtANkjplZx1n/Z0XIqkLT+D +Q+G6EaL2M6Hfs548oQhk0mC0d9tkF34qKfGk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ogVm8q4vxMO59d6Vjfwzh7SIb/buR0luxkruvSeewAbbuoF+p2SI/Uqxn7kkU9WGQt m0TUUuR22lIpnqA4VEqiOjTY4x9XvV0ZW38YMIllsn+fDvQpjOXfT1iGtBJVfsRh73c4 fagAyMytud1E6mQDlwCywSPKadkoQ/g3wJ09o= Received: by 10.227.146.21 with SMTP id f21mr7383111wbv.183.1296761147915; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 11:25:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from Melon.malikania.fr (65.21.102-84.rev.gaoland.net [84.102.21.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u9sm847153wbg.0.2011.02.03.11.25.45 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 03 Feb 2011 11:25:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D4B012B.1020606@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 20:25:31 +0100 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110125 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <120019.9166.qm@web161611.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <120019.9166.qm@web161611.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: AHCI dvd woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 19:25:51 -0000 On 02/02/2011 05:56, Neil Short wrote: > old problem on HP laptops. the workaround has been to go to the BIOS and switch from AHCI to IDE interface; but my BIOS doesn't support switching. > > is anybody working on this? > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" What's your problem exactly ? If you're not using ahci(4) and using AHCI interface on your laptop you may encounter troubles yes. I personnally prefere switching to IDE it works better, but because you can't try the ahci(4) driver. Cheers, -- David Demelier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 19:43:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1999C10656A6 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:43:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from listreader@lazlarlyricon.com) Received: from mailgw22.surf-town.net (mail12.surf-town.net [212.97.132.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95F48FC19 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mailgw22.surf-town.net (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 11CF9F1880; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:43:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw22.surf-town.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC093F18CA for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:43:22 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mailgw22.surf-town.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.44 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.44 tagged_above=-999 required=7 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.44] Received: from mailgw22.surf-town.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailgw22.surf-town.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id oW0pKOAESRbh for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:43:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from lazlar.kicks-ass.net (c-0987e355.09-42-6e6b7010.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [85.227.135.9]) by mailgw22.surf-town.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CC72DF18BD for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:43:16 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4D4B0553.8080306@lazlarlyricon.com> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 20:43:15 +0100 From: Rolf Nielsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110117 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Status of UDF driver on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 19:43:25 -0000 Hello, I've never given this any thought, until I recently bought a Blu-ray drive, and realised that I can neither mount commercial Blu-ray discs or watch the films with mplayer. As I understand the problem, it is because FreeBSD has no support for newer versions of UDF and that Blu-ray films use UDF 2.50 or 2.60. I did find some suggestion for a Summer of Code project to port the NetBSD implementation of UDF, and that that has support for newer versions, and also write support. So my question is, is there any work being done on this, and if so, what is its status? Sincerely, Rolf Nielsen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 19:47:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69921065674 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:47:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=0015394c74=kalts@estcard.ee) Received: from smtp.estcard.ee (smtp.estcard.ee [194.204.11.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755838FC20 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 19:47:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fserv.internal ([192.168.10.3]) by smtp.estcard.ee with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.73) (envelope-from ) id 1Pl58p-0006jc-LK; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:47:01 +0200 Received: from myhakas.internal ([192.168.21.128]) by fserv.internal with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pl58p-0000jq-Ge; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:46:55 +0200 Received: from kalts by myhakas.internal with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pl58p-0006yf-F9; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:46:55 +0200 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 21:46:55 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste To: Jan Henrik Sylvester Message-ID: <20110203194655.GA26551@hape.internal> References: <20110131154759.GA17485@hape.internal> <4D46E6A8.8040408@janh.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D46E6A8.8040408@janh.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: questions-list freebsd Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.2: state of Kerberos, GSS-API and (Cyrus) SASL? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalts@estpak.ee List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 19:47:02 -0000 On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 05:43:20PM +0100, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > I am struggling with exactly the same problem. Unfortunately, I got > no reply on this list about it: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2011-January/226495.html > > If you get any further, please, tell me. I am thinking about > reposting my question to a different list: stable as that is where > the earlier discussions happened or ports as that seems more > appropriate. > Installed net/openldap24-server port defining WITH_SASL=YES and it seems that SASL/GSSAPI authentication works: [vallo@kdc2 ~]$ klist Credentials cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_NoXXXX Principal: vallo@EXAMPLE.COM Issued Expires Principal Feb 3 21:20:48 Feb 4 21:02:45 krbtgt/EXAMPLE.COM@EXAMPLE.COM Feb 3 21:25:44 Feb 4 21:02:45 ldap/kdc2.internal@EXAMPLE.COM [vallo@kdc2 ~]$ ldapsearch -Y GSSAPI -b '' -s base '(objectclass=*)' namingContexts SASL/GSSAPI authentication started SASL username: vallo@EXAMPLE.COM SASL SSF: 56 SASL data security layer installed. # extended LDIF # # LDAPv3 # base <> with scope baseObject # filter: (objectclass=*) # requesting: namingContexts # # dn: namingContexts: dc=example,dc=com # search result search: 4 result: 0 Success # numResponses: 2 # numEntries: 1 Slapd needs read access to /etc/krb5.keytab or separate keytab. Keytab must contain ldap service account of course. This example was done on the system the slapd runs on. Please let me know if you get it working (or not). -- Vallo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 20:35:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138B210656A8 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:35:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=0008e0cf97=johnl@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [64.57.183.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD958FC18 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:35:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36312 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2011 20:35:21 -0000 Received: from mail1.iecc.com (64.57.183.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 3 Feb 2011 20:35:21 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=145ca.4d4b1189.k1102; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=www6QPOBRRdA/YlW9Ci2t3jtJviKxGyTT2yuqiRt0tE=; b=drtQ+zyrdZ5oh6cIiDppe8XoTc+Z+zxM1n93/SfGSeLii0k/RDh9H4aOUUwL9oksBSOfrLPcEZZnKqenDmF8IzYZ9Xmkf9A4YUPZpYl+fWC0sQvR7oxHm8PzgCICpbAG++ib5Klb6FtikYXXS0iv9Gba+aDgIh2eIB2qVlILnAM= VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org Date: 3 Feb 2011 20:35:21 -0000 Message-ID: <20110203203521.83401.qmail@joyce.lan> From: John Levine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4D4AE421.4040807@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de Subject: Re: editors/openoffice-org-3.3.0: serious issue with X11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 20:35:23 -0000 I just installed the current 3.3 snapshot openoffice.org-3.3.20110121 from good-day.net and it seems to work fine on my 8.1 amd64 gnome laptop. Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 20:36:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5871065693 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:36:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82838FC14 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:36:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so1541627wwf.31 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:36:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UBy0SIrN0RFP2kw9W9jfOb0Q7zPLhtgnJp1+xyfjQLQ=; b=AvJIwBogQ29OF2ZfSvgRL2ZNhLMFDI/9BuHTzBSzBSkgdDq5B+S0FOX2xddft7cCcv zPKLk8k21gUo8xpMwVPxUNZZKJ36eUWi24mwN/DJ2BduihAFvmIFIBsTcf3dyBgOLz2n XjsxIqAMMnaxb/7UtsAUELJLdS80Jw9eWgc9A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=diOSlQS4OL+ZxsmU6j46knvzgLm8EODbGa6t9hvMToW/USsmVqYjIgPSyxk5mdUdFH LT4dLH+tuM0gjEla14JJp2L5gzulhpBPvMWTtF+MmSiyJqR2Ze+vAQFixD0PdxQlvlKt r2kCaVyrPWCo6UTjsDz6IqzyaZe/VQVPAg+2Q= Received: by 10.227.155.197 with SMTP id t5mr11088449wbw.3.1296765408760; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:36:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from Melon.malikania.fr (65.21.102-84.rev.gaoland.net [84.102.21.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u9sm897780wbg.0.2011.02.03.12.36.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:36:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D4B11D0.3050709@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:36:32 +0100 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110125 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Can't burn with ahci(4) and cdrecord X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 20:36:50 -0000 Hello, I tried to burn a little iso with ahci(4) instead of old ata drivers and it fails to burn with : markand@Melon ~ $ sudo cdrecord downloads/ubuntu-10.10-desktop-i386.iso cdrecord: No write mode specified. cdrecord: Assuming -sao mode. cdrecord: If your drive does not accept -sao, try -tao. cdrecord: Future versions of cdrecord may have different drive dependent defaults. Cdrecord-ProDVD-ProBD-Clone 3.00 (amd64-unknown-freebsd8.2) Copyright (C) 1995-2010 Jörg Schilling Using libscg version 'schily-0.9'. No target specified, trying to find one... Using dev=1,0,0. Device type : Removable CD-ROM Version : 0 Response Format: 2 Capabilities : Vendor_info : 'hp ' Identifikation : 'DVDRAM GT20L ' Revision : 'DC05' Device seems to be: Generic mmc2 DVD-R/DVD-RW/DVD-RAM. Using generic SCSI-3/mmc CD-R/CD-RW driver (mmc_cdr). Driver flags : MMC-3 SWABAUDIO BURNFREE Supported modes: TAO PACKET SAO SAO/R96P SAO/R96R RAW/R16 RAW/R96P RAW/R96R LAYER_JUMP Starting to write CD/DVD/BD at speed 24 in real SAO mode for single session. Last chance to quit, starting real write 0 seconds. Operation starts. Turning BURN-Free off cdrecord: WARNING: Drive returns wrong startsec (0) using -150 cdrecord: Input/output error. write_g1: scsi sendcmd: retryable error CDB: 2A 00 FF FF FF 6A 00 00 20 00 status: 0x2 (CHECK CONDITION) Sense Bytes: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Sense Key: 0xFFFFFFFF [], Segment 0 Sense Code: 0x00 Qual 0x00 (no additional sense information) Fru 0x0 Sense flags: Blk 0 (not valid) resid: 65536 cmd finished after 13.147s timeout 200s write track pad data: error after 0 bytes BFree: 597 K BSize: 597 K cdrecord: Input/output error. write_g1: scsi sendcmd: retryable error CDB: 2A 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20 00 status: 0x2 (CHECK CONDITION) Sense Bytes: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Sense Key: 0xFFFFFFFF [], Segment 0 Sense Code: 0x00 Qual 0x00 (no additional sense information) Fru 0x0 Sense flags: Blk 0 (not valid) resid: 65536 cmd finished after 0.001s timeout 200s write track data: error after 0 bytes cdrecord: A write error occured. cdrecord: Please properly read the error message above. This is happening on my HP Probook 4510s with 8.2-RC2 amd64. -- David Demelier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 21:00:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2C11065670; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 21:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B0A8FC14; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 21:00:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so1602635wyf.13 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:00:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qKHRP/+hVbeM/Z+4yhp/oIJaZUYy0qapMBZIZAwu+OQ=; b=PA4vrmyPFWNpufiDDQs29Zi3Rukf2uLzW8jsWjnbeW8HaryzE/gSRC6QoVI+nikB32 5R1gpWvlJ+Y3jlM4nGA9+JKBh2xVZ1trzj5mmC2l67ggQj3bYY8D/LBKgzHamg8bj5GA j1kUKXvB3c65kLTZpqU+au4WKAGhAoX39NXnY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sycPv5+OswPj0ZdcpB5FQrh7T3ytWd1X7QjLqZnfC/LiZJVPqjoOuwahFD3EC2goto 7HXQDBhwCz/kN7zIjFQJGrJxcQIxqxWohoG7miHm/Mm73S/b5eYbA3A//O+Q3nFbJqOI E6vdnzX3VGo2+qXkz+aF1N2q7n3hPUlX8C9BA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.173.147 with SMTP id v19mr10828612wel.102.1296766828153; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:00:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.36.71 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:00:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D4B11D0.3050709@gmail.com> References: <4D4B11D0.3050709@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 15:00:28 -0600 Message-ID: From: Brandon Gooch To: David Demelier Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de, Alexander Motin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't burn with ahci(4) and cdrecord X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:00:30 -0000 On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:36 PM, David Demelier w= rote: > Hello, > > I tried to burn a little iso with ahci(4) instead of old ata drivers and = it > fails to burn with : > > markand@Melon ~ $ sudo cdrecord downloads/ubuntu-10.10-desktop-i386.iso > cdrecord: No write mode specified. > cdrecord: Assuming -sao mode. > cdrecord: If your drive does not accept -sao, try -tao. > cdrecord: Future versions of cdrecord may have different drive dependent > defaults. > Cdrecord-ProDVD-ProBD-Clone 3.00 (amd64-unknown-freebsd8.2) Copyright (C) > 1995-2010 J=F6rg Schilling > Using libscg version 'schily-0.9'. > No target specified, trying to find one... > Using dev=3D1,0,0. > Device type =A0 =A0: Removable CD-ROM > Version =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0: 0 > Response Format: 2 > Capabilities =A0 : > Vendor_info =A0 =A0: 'hp =A0 =A0 =A0' > Identifikation : 'DVDRAM GT20L =A0 =A0' > Revision =A0 =A0 =A0 : 'DC05' > Device seems to be: Generic mmc2 DVD-R/DVD-RW/DVD-RAM. > Using generic SCSI-3/mmc =A0 CD-R/CD-RW driver (mmc_cdr). > Driver flags =A0 : MMC-3 SWABAUDIO BURNFREE > Supported modes: TAO PACKET SAO SAO/R96P SAO/R96R RAW/R16 RAW/R96P RAW/R9= 6R > LAYER_JUMP > Starting to write CD/DVD/BD at speed 24 in real SAO mode for single sessi= on. > Last chance to quit, starting real write =A0 =A00 seconds. Operation star= ts. > Turning BURN-Free off > cdrecord: WARNING: Drive returns wrong startsec (0) using -150 > cdrecord: Input/output error. write_g1: scsi sendcmd: retryable error > CDB: =A02A 00 FF FF FF 6A 00 00 20 00 > status: 0x2 (CHECK CONDITION) > Sense Bytes: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 = 00 > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > Sense Key: 0xFFFFFFFF [], Segment 0 > Sense Code: 0x00 Qual 0x00 (no additional sense information) Fru 0x0 > Sense flags: Blk 0 (not valid) > resid: 65536 > cmd finished after 13.147s timeout 200s > write track pad data: error after 0 bytes > BFree: 597 K BSize: 597 K > cdrecord: Input/output error. write_g1: scsi sendcmd: retryable error > CDB: =A02A 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20 00 > status: 0x2 (CHECK CONDITION) > Sense Bytes: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 = 00 > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > Sense Key: 0xFFFFFFFF [], Segment 0 > Sense Code: 0x00 Qual 0x00 (no additional sense information) Fru 0x0 > Sense flags: Blk 0 (not valid) > resid: 65536 > cmd finished after 0.001s timeout 200s > write track data: error after 0 bytes > cdrecord: A write error occured. > cdrecord: Please properly read the error message above. > > This is happening on my HP Probook 4510s with 8.2-RC2 amd64. Are you on 8.x or 9? I think this is due to a known issue [1]. Alexander Motin has patches for 9-CURRENT [2] that fix the issue for me (and others). He hasn't had time to clean up the patches for committal to the tree, and the patches may no longer cleanly apply -- I haven't re-patched since my last few updates. Let us know if the patches work for you. -Brandon [1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2010-November/020944= .html [2] http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/sense/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 21:35:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id 7B910106566C; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 21:35:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 21:35:05 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: David Demelier Message-ID: <20110203213505.GA73226@freebsd.org> References: <4D4B11D0.3050709@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4D4B11D0.3050709@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't burn with ahci(4) and cdrecord X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:35:05 -0000 On Thu Feb 3 11, David Demelier wrote: > Hello, > > I tried to burn a little iso with ahci(4) instead of old ata drivers and > it fails to burn with : i have similar issues. for me using "-tao" solved the error. cheers. alex > > markand@Melon ~ $ sudo cdrecord downloads/ubuntu-10.10-desktop-i386.iso > cdrecord: No write mode specified. > cdrecord: Assuming -sao mode. > cdrecord: If your drive does not accept -sao, try -tao. > cdrecord: Future versions of cdrecord may have different drive dependent > defaults. > Cdrecord-ProDVD-ProBD-Clone 3.00 (amd64-unknown-freebsd8.2) Copyright > (C) 1995-2010 Jörg Schilling > Using libscg version 'schily-0.9'. > No target specified, trying to find one... > Using dev=1,0,0. > Device type : Removable CD-ROM > Version : 0 > Response Format: 2 > Capabilities : > Vendor_info : 'hp ' > Identifikation : 'DVDRAM GT20L ' > Revision : 'DC05' > Device seems to be: Generic mmc2 DVD-R/DVD-RW/DVD-RAM. > Using generic SCSI-3/mmc CD-R/CD-RW driver (mmc_cdr). > Driver flags : MMC-3 SWABAUDIO BURNFREE > Supported modes: TAO PACKET SAO SAO/R96P SAO/R96R RAW/R16 RAW/R96P > RAW/R96R LAYER_JUMP > Starting to write CD/DVD/BD at speed 24 in real SAO mode for single session. > Last chance to quit, starting real write 0 seconds. Operation starts. > Turning BURN-Free off > cdrecord: WARNING: Drive returns wrong startsec (0) using -150 > cdrecord: Input/output error. write_g1: scsi sendcmd: retryable error > CDB: 2A 00 FF FF FF 6A 00 00 20 00 > status: 0x2 (CHECK CONDITION) > Sense Bytes: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > Sense Key: 0xFFFFFFFF [], Segment 0 > Sense Code: 0x00 Qual 0x00 (no additional sense information) Fru 0x0 > Sense flags: Blk 0 (not valid) > resid: 65536 > cmd finished after 13.147s timeout 200s > write track pad data: error after 0 bytes > BFree: 597 K BSize: 597 K > cdrecord: Input/output error. write_g1: scsi sendcmd: retryable error > CDB: 2A 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20 00 > status: 0x2 (CHECK CONDITION) > Sense Bytes: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > Sense Key: 0xFFFFFFFF [], Segment 0 > Sense Code: 0x00 Qual 0x00 (no additional sense information) Fru 0x0 > Sense flags: Blk 0 (not valid) > resid: 65536 > cmd finished after 0.001s timeout 200s > write track data: error after 0 bytes > cdrecord: A write error occured. > cdrecord: Please properly read the error message above. > > This is happening on my HP Probook 4510s with 8.2-RC2 amd64. > > -- > David Demelier -- a13x From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 21:38:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id 7A7FC1065672; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 21:38:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 21:38:46 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: Rolf Nielsen Message-ID: <20110203213846.GB73226@freebsd.org> References: <4D4B0553.8080306@lazlarlyricon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D4B0553.8080306@lazlarlyricon.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of UDF driver on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:38:46 -0000 On Thu Feb 3 11, Rolf Nielsen wrote: > Hello, > > I've never given this any thought, until I recently bought a Blu-ray > drive, and realised that I can neither mount commercial Blu-ray discs or > watch the films with mplayer. As I understand the problem, it is because > FreeBSD has no support for newer versions of UDF and that Blu-ray films > use UDF 2.50 or 2.60. I did find some suggestion for a Summer of Code > project to port the NetBSD implementation of UDF, and that that has > support for newer versions, and also write support. So my question is, > is there any work being done on this, and if so, what is its status? i don't think anybody is working on this atm. please also note that there's a PR related to this issue [1]. also openbsd seems to have support for udf 2.50 and 2.60, too. cheers. alex [1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/120989 > > Sincerely, > > Rolf Nielsen -- a13x From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 21:41:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F211065672 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 21:41:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.27.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A141C8FC0C for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 21:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta18.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.74]) by qmta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 3X4E1g0041bwxycAFZhVbs; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:41:29 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta18.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 3ZhR1g00J46zqiB8eZhSek; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:41:26 +0000 Message-ID: <4D4B2104.7080802@comcast.net> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:41:24 -0800 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110131 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Running Xsane as user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:41:29 -0000 Boy, this kind of problem has been following around lately. When I attempt to start Xsane as user I get an error message telling me "No device available." One of the help options states that the permissions for the device file may not allow its use---try as root. Naturally, when I start the program as root it recognizes the scanner and works perfectly. But I sure don't want to run this program as root. I thought that I had all of my permissions taken care of in /etc/devfs.conf, but apparently I don't. Either that or it really isn't a permissions problem to begin with, in which case I'm not sure where to start looking for a solution. Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 22:13:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255AE1065694 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 22:13:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973888FC19 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 22:13:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.net (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p13MD52v055101; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 23:13:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E2757BABC; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 23:13:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 23:13:04 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Rem P Roberti Message-ID: <20110203221304.GA36175@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: <4D4B2104.7080802@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D4B2104.7080802@comcast.net> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Running Xsane as user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:13:10 -0000 --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 01:41:24PM -0800, Rem P Roberti wrote: > Boy, this kind of problem has been following around lately. When I=20 > attempt to start Xsane as user I get an error message telling me "No=20 > device available." One of the help options states that the permissions= =20 > for the device file may not allow its use---try as root. Naturally,=20 > when I start the program as root it recognizes the scanner and works=20 > perfectly. But I sure don't want to run this program as root. I=20 > thought that I had all of my permissions taken care of in=20 > /etc/devfs.conf, but apparently I don't. Either that or it really isn't= =20 > a permissions problem to begin with, in which case I'm not sure where to= =20 > start looking for a solution. The file devfs.conf is only for devices that are connected at boot. For devices like USB that are plugged in after booting, you should use devfs.rules. Read the manpages for devfs.conf and devfs.rules.=20 I've got the following in my /etc/devfs.rules for USB devices; add path 'usb/*' mode 0660 group usb add path 'ugen*' mode 0660 group usb Of course my user-id is in the usb group. If you trust all users of the sys= tem then 'mode 0666' would suffice, and you don't need to use a special group. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk1LKHAACgkQEnfvsMMhpyWroACcD3+gFzA0C+doz5sumAg8DIS1 FpwAnAqZpHNO6xYgkZyWQn3iv36Yu8SQ =NDKe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 22:54:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3B0106564A for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 22:54:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from neshort@yahoo.com) Received: from web161613.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (web161613.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.211.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C9BF8FC15 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 22:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78653 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Feb 2011 22:54:08 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1296773648; bh=jVZXC4pYH1BhewcgPBV3FQcNqW/X/85oiBPwjOT5HTQ=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uWASwIZ82jGamsbNuWM9dsKfCtLdw9uDj6aAgQlhNPn53HwGeM2LicA5UqH+s6bHy94ZKA8Nw9b22aCQG1TrTviZ0Le6W/RHhl7bim+kduvKgRCkptQj7+p4+h4s6EuwQj9iZqz9aUDd3X+CY8xmB73Qb5/0ejl8mm0PjieiIVg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=xKNXLR2eak54sWUadJgMqqpvUpbwAKgmtvSUkEtwzDp10idFg2ICsa3zxMvJDn5aINkWLfJTOo7wgAeq1Q9jhhDyjBYtPWEfpBeSUATKmkti4laJ7gxo6SRWj72IXoqftHCV5Uznozrbjtfj2gdthwtHJjxUfHxTxKYIG4Moo0g=; Message-ID: <192348.76874.qm@web161613.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: un6srIYVM1kREeCn.Z7p2jK9_rP3yy9yfG_zzZ9zGW1DrLz viQ9YFjPXCRFgIEwrNocG6LHY4NLazTMIQ9.VDd2hmP68i0BvvZ7wn3bh3t7 dEHsuC16jJXJq63_Ay.PnqDDRfAvuoclPq5nBSl45e9O32OcmbCXehsASfjM U_mdbDqHqev7uuEbcp8rsNEm.7aH1NWAx78CYzFCj6NUjZ3.jVNAB4Jf6MqR tw0vYKk4wAaJIyOjR9rI5mKKjEclUBQ1YKKQ3P2vZYnj2hLFhLqdyUonuY0T aplaWtwA- Received: from [174.18.252.145] by web161613.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:54:08 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.108.291010 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 14:54:08 -0800 (PST) From: Neil Short To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: AHCI dvd woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:54:09 -0000 old problem on HP laptops. the workaround has been to go to the BIOS and switch from AHCI to IDE interface; but my BIOS doesn't support switching. is anybody working on this? details: /$ mplayer dvd:// MPlayer SVN-r30341-snapshot-4.2.1 (C) 2000-2009 MPlayer Team Playing dvd://. libdvdread: Using libdvdcss version 1.2.10 for DVD access There are 6 titles on this DVD. There are 1 angles in this DVD title. libdvdread: Attempting to retrieve all CSS keys libdvdread: This can take a _long_ time, please be patient libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VIDEO_TS.VOB at 0x0000012a libdvdread: Error cracking CSS key for /VIDEO_TS/VIDEO_TS.VOB (0x0000012a) libdvdread: Elapsed time 11 libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_01_0.VOB at 0x0000042c libdvdread: Error cracking CSS key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_01_0.VOB (0x0000042c) libdvdread: Elapsed time 10 libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_01_1.VOB at 0x00000a3d libdvdread: Error cracking CSS key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_01_1.VOB (0x00000a3d)!! libdvdread: Elapsed time 10 libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_02_0.VOB at 0x00210848 libdvdread: Error cracking CSS key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_02_0.VOB (0x00210848) libdvdread: Elapsed time 10 libdvdread: Get key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_02_1.VOB at 0x00210bef libdvdread: Error cracking CSS key for /VIDEO_TS/VTS_02_1.VOB (0x00210bef)!! libdvdread: Elapsed time 10 libdvdread: Found 2 VTS's libdvdread: Elapsed time 51 audio stream: 0 format: ac3 (5.1) language: en aid: 128. audio stream: 1 format: ac3 (stereo) language: en aid: 129. number of audio channels on disk: 2. subtitle ( sid ): 0 language: en subtitle ( sid ): 1 language: es number of subtitles on disk: 2 Cache fill: 0.00% (0 bytes) Exiting... (End of file) console shows: acd0: FAILURE - SEND_KEY timed out acd0: FAILURE - SEND_KEY timed out acd0: FAILURE - SEND_KEY timed out acd0: FAILURE - SEND_KEY timed out acd0: FAILURE - SEND_KEY timed out acd0: FAILURE - SEND_KEY timed out acd0: FAILURE - SEND_KEY timed out acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x6f ascq=0x03 acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x6f ascq=0x03 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 3 23:10:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB2E1065672 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 23:10:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from listreader@lazlarlyricon.com) Received: from mailgw9.surf-town.net (mail8.surf-town.net [212.97.132.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBBA98FC19 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 23:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mailgw9.surf-town.net (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 1CC279B5D3; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 00:10:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw9.surf-town.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF449B5D6; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 00:10:32 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mailgw9.surf-town.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.44 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.44 tagged_above=-999 required=7 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.44] Received: from mailgw9.surf-town.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailgw9.surf-town.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id YoL3vNyM+hns; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 00:10:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from lazlar.kicks-ass.net (c-0987e355.09-42-6e6b7010.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [85.227.135.9]) by mailgw9.surf-town.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8B85A9B5D0; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 00:09:58 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4D4B35C6.7010609@lazlarlyricon.com> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:09:58 +0100 From: Rolf Nielsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110117 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Best References: <4D4B0553.8080306@lazlarlyricon.com> <20110203213846.GB73226@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20110203213846.GB73226@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of UDF driver on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 23:10:35 -0000 2011-02-03 22:38, Alexander Best skrev: > On Thu Feb 3 11, Rolf Nielsen wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've never given this any thought, until I recently bought a Blu-ray >> drive, and realised that I can neither mount commercial Blu-ray discs or >> watch the films with mplayer. As I understand the problem, it is because >> FreeBSD has no support for newer versions of UDF and that Blu-ray films >> use UDF 2.50 or 2.60. I did find some suggestion for a Summer of Code >> project to port the NetBSD implementation of UDF, and that that has >> support for newer versions, and also write support. So my question is, >> is there any work being done on this, and if so, what is its status? > > i don't think anybody is working on this atm. please also note that there's > a PR related to this issue [1]. also openbsd seems to have support for udf > 2.50 and 2.60, too. > > cheers. > alex > > [1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/120989 I see. Thanks. It's not that important to me, because I am able to create UDF Blu-ray discs (e.g. with matroska files or audio files) that are readable in my Blu-ray player, and that seems more important than being able to play films on my computer. However, it would be fun to have a bdauthor similar to dvdauthor, and being able to create BD Video discs (that may of course be possible without being able to actually read the discs on the computer; I've never been able to get anything vcdimager creates to work on my computer, but they work perfectly on every DVD player I've tried). Discussions about such an authoring app isn't for this list though, and that's why I brought up only the UDF bit. Anyway, thanks for replying. Rolf > >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Rolf Nielsen > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 01:07:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6759106566C for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 01:07:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.27.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978398FC08 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 01:07:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.27]) by qmta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 3cuH1g0050b6N64ACd7Vjg; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 01:07:29 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 3d7T1g00C46zqiB8Pd7Upj; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 01:07:28 +0000 Message-ID: <4D4B514F.4060908@comcast.net> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:07:27 -0800 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110131 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland Smith References: <4D4B2104.7080802@comcast.net> <20110203221304.GA36175@slackbox.erewhon.net> In-Reply-To: <20110203221304.GA36175@slackbox.erewhon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Running Xsane as user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 01:07:29 -0000 > Boy, this kind of problem has been following around lately. When I >> attempt to start Xsane as user I get an error message telling me "No >> device available." One of the help options states that the permissions >> for the device file may not allow its use---try as root. Naturally, >> when I start the program as root it recognizes the scanner and works >> perfectly. But I sure don't want to run this program as root. I >> thought that I had all of my permissions taken care of in >> /etc/devfs.conf, but apparently I don't. Either that or it really isn't >> a permissions problem to begin with, in which case I'm not sure where to >> start looking for a solution. > The file devfs.conf is only for devices that are connected at boot. For > devices like USB that are plugged in after booting, you should use > devfs.rules. Read the manpages for devfs.conf and devfs.rules. > > I've got the following in my /etc/devfs.rules for USB devices; > > add path 'usb/*' mode 0660 group usb > add path 'ugen*' mode 0660 group usb > > Of course my user-id is in the usb group. If you trust all users of the system > then 'mode 0666' would suffice, and you don't need to use a special group. > > Roland Yep...I was a bit quick on the trigger. Object lesson: IT PAYS TO READ THE HANDBOOK!:-) But thank you for responding. Once I created the usb group and put the appropriate entries in /etc/devfs.rules all was well. This was a good learn for me, however, since I now understand the difference between devfs.conf and devfs.rules. Cheers... Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 02:02:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF935106566C for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 02:02:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965708FC0C for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 02:02:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.71]) by qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 3dzM1g0011Y3wxoA4e2Bsv; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 02:02:11 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 3e291g01446zqiB8be2Ayb; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 02:02:10 +0000 Message-ID: <4D4B5E21.5060107@comcast.net> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:02:09 -0800 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110131 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Scanner recommendation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 02:02:11 -0000 Now that I understand how to get a scanner working, if there are any photographers out there who are using scanners with FreeBSD for negatives or slides I would love to hear a recommendation. I have an Epson V500, but it is unsupported, and the only scanner that I have that is supported is an old HP Scanjet 3970, which is a poor scanner for doing negatives or slides. Cheers... Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 03:03:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85A81065679 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 03:03:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dwassman@cricpa.com) Received: from sv4-mta-52a.us.emailfiltering.com (sv4-mta-52a.emailfiltering.com [208.87.136.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4238FC15 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 03:03:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 66-112-105-100.stat.centurytel.net ([66.112.105.100]) by sv4-mta-52a.us.emailfiltering.com with emfmta (version 4.8.0.417) by TLS id 872114420 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; 750a5bb28c09426b; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:45:51 -0800 Received: from CRI-EXCH-01.cri.local ([fe80::24d5:afa7:e27b:9d6d]) by CRI-EXCH-01.cri.local ([fe80::24d5:afa7:e27b:9d6d%11]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:45:49 -0600 From: "David M. Wassman" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , "samba@lists.samba.org" Thread-Topic: PAM authentication with winbind and AD Thread-Index: AcvEDUc7uYb2rluZS2CcthReHnraUg== Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 02:45:49 +0000 Message-ID: <584186951FAB6942B6F9E82B8B9A8EEE1E24A724@CRI-EXCH-01.cri.local> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [184.252.67.249] x-exclaimer-md-config: eee4f18d-0e3e-4794-96f0-cd298a2861ee x-exclaimer-md-bifurcation-instance: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Subject: PAM authentication with winbind and AD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 03:03:34 -0000 All, After two days of googling, reading, swearing and cursing, I am finally adm= itting I cannot solve this one. I have three production FreeBSD servers run= ning various network utilities (DHCP, bacula, zabix, syslog, rsync). These = have been running fine for several years. As a primary Windows domain (acco= unting firm. Not much choice), I like to centralize all logins into AD whic= h is currently mixed 2003/2008 DCs. To achieve this with FreeBSD, I have be= en using the following instructions since FreeBSD 6.1 and Samba 3.0 with th= e exception that I built all the ports through the ports collection: http://oslabs.mikro-net.com/fbsd_samba.html It has always worked for several years through FreeBSD 7.1 and Samba 3.2 wi= th the current AD structure but recently I decided to upgrade the Samba por= t and now I am having issues. To troubleshoot, I have setup a clean install= of FreeBSD 8.1 with the follow ports built with the following options and = setup: openntpd heimdal 1.4 IPV6=3Don KCM=3Don BDB=3Doff SQLITE=3Doff LDAP=3Doff PKINIT=3Don DIGEST=3Don KX509=3Don KRB4=3Doff CRACKLIB=3Doff X11=3Doff cyprus-sasl2 BDB=3Don MYSQL=3Doff PGSQL=3Doff SQLITE=3Doff DEV_URANDOM=3Doff ALWAYSTRUE=3Doff KEEP_DB_OPEN=3Doff AUTHDAEMOND=3Doff LOGIN=3Doff PLAIN=3Doff CRAM=3Doff DIGEST=3Doff OTP=3Doff NTLM=3Doff openldap24-sasl-client SASL=3Don FETCH=3Don samba 3.5 LDAP=3Don ADS=3Don CUPS=3Doff WINBIND=3Don SWAT=3Doff ACL_SUPPORT=3Don AIO_SUPPORT=3Don FAM_SUPPORT=3Don SYSLOG=3Don QUOTAS=3Don UTMP=3Don PAM_SMBPASS=3Don DNSUPDATE=3Doff AVAHI=3Doff EXP_MODULES=3Don POPT=3Don IPV6=3Doff MAX_DEBUG=3Doff SMBTORTURE=3Doff After setting up as I have before, I can get ldapsearch, wbinfo -u and gete= nt passwd username to display the correct info. It appears that winbind is = communicating with AD. But the login command fails with a signal 11 (core d= ump) and no other info. I have included configs and an abridged log below as well. Some information= in the configs and logs have been edited for security but I am sure they a= re set correctly in the real files. I would appreciate any help. If there is easier, newer and/or better way to= authenticate users to AD on FreeBSD, please let me know. I don't use Samba= for file shares, just for authentication. /etc/krb5.conf [logging] default =3D SYSLOG:AUTH:INFO kdc =3D SYSLOG:AUTH:INFO admin_server =3D SYSLOG:AUTH:INFO [libdefaults] default_domain =3D EXAMPLE.COM [realms] EXAMPLE.COM =3D { kdc =3D gnv-dc3-tmp.example.com default_domain =3D example.com admin_server =3D gnv-dc3-tmp.example.com } [domain_realm] .example.com =3D EXAMPLE.COM example.com =3D EXAMPLE.COM .EXAMPLE.COM =3D EXAMPLE.COM [appdefaults] pam =3D { debug =3D false ticket_lifetime =3D 36000 renew_lifetime =3D 36000 forwardable =3D true krb4_convert =3D false } /usr/local/etc/openldap/ldap.conf host gnv-dc3-tmp.example.com base dc=3Dexample,dc=3Dcom ldap_version 3 URI ldap://gnv-dc3-tmp.example.com binddn cn=3Dusername,cn=3DGNV,cn=3DAllUsers,dc=3Dexample,dc=3Dcom bindpw p@55w0rd scope sub pam_login_attribute sAMAccountName pam_passwd md5 idle_timeout 3600 nss_base_passwd dc=3Dexample,dc=3Dcom?one nss_base_group dc=3Dexample,dc=3Dcom?one sasl_secprops maxssf=3D0 krb5_ccname FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 /etc/pam.d/login auth sufficient pam_winbind.so auth sufficient pam_self.so no_warn auth include system # account account sufficient pam_winbind.so account requisite pam_securetty.so account required pam_nologin.so account include system # session session include system # password password include system /etc/nsswitch.conf group: files winbind group_compat: nis hosts: files dns networks: files passwd: files winbind passwd_compat: nis shells: files services: compat services_compat: nis protocols: files rpc: files /usr/local/etc/smb.conf [global] realm =3D EXAMPLE.COM security =3D ADS encrypt passwords =3D yes socket options =3D TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE SO_SNDBUF=3D8192= SO_RCVBUF=3D8192 workgroup =3D EXAMPLE server string =3D allow trusted domains =3D no idmap backend =3D idmap_rid:EXAMPLE=3D100000-200000 idmap uid =3D 100001-200000 idmap gid =3D 100001-200000 netbios name =3D GNV-NS2-TMP winbind use default domain =3D yes syslog =3D 3 syslog only =3D yes template shell =3D /bin/tcsh restrict anonymous =3D 2 client ntlmv2 auth =3D yes /var/log/all.log Feb 3 16:09:38 gnv-ns2-tmp ntpd[29094]: ntp engine ready Feb 3 16:09:40 gnv-ns2-tmp ntpd[29093]: set local clock to Thu Feb 3 16:0= 9:40 EST 2011 (offset 1.713505s) Feb 3 16:10:03 gnv-ns2-tmp ntpd[29094]: peer 192.168.4.19 now valid Feb 3 16:12:27 gnv-ns2-tmp ntpd[29094]: clock is now synced Feb 3 16:13:31 gnv-ns2-tmp ntpd[29096]: adjusting local clock by 0.032613s Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp smbd[25927]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.413455, 1] s= mbd/files.c:193(file_init) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp smbd[25927]: file_init: Information only: req= uested 16384 open files, 11075 are available. Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25932]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.458752, = 0] winbindd/winbindd_cache.c:3076(initialize_winbindd_cache) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 932]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.458752, 0] winbindd/winbindd_cache.c:3076(initi= alize_winbindd_cache) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25932]: initialize_winbindd_cache: c= learing cache and re-creating with version number 1 Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 932]: initialize_winbindd_cache: clearing cache and re-creating with vers= ion number 1 Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.559938, = 1] winbindd/idmap.c:438(idmap_init_passdb_domain) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: Could not init passdb idmap = domain Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.560226, = 1] winbindd/idmap.c:244(parse_idmap_module) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: idmap_init: idmap backend us= es deprecated 'idmap_' prefix. Please replace 'idmap_rid:EXAMPLE=3D10000-2= 0000' by 'rid:EXAMPLE=3D10000-20000' Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.567300, = 0] winbindd/idmap.c:201(smb_register_idmap_alloc) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.567300, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:201(smb_register_id= map_alloc) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: idmap_alloc module ldap alre= ady registered! Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: idmap_alloc module ldap already registered! Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.567417, = 0] winbindd/idmap.c:201(smb_register_idmap_alloc) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.567417, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:201(smb_register_id= map_alloc) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: idmap_alloc module tdb alrea= dy registered! Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: idmap_alloc module tdb already registered! Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.567495, = 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_idmap) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.567495, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_id= map) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: Idmap module passdb already = registered! Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: Idmap module passdb already registered! Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.567564, = 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_idmap) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.567564, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_id= map) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: Idmap module nss already reg= istered! Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: Idmap module nss already registered! Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.567711, = 1] winbindd/idmap.c:244(parse_idmap_module) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: idmap_init: idmap backend us= es deprecated 'idmap_' prefix. Please replace 'idmap_rid:EXAMPLE=3D10000-2= 0000' by 'rid:EXAMPLE=3D10000-20000' Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.567852, = 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_idmap) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.567852, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_id= map) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: Idmap module rid already reg= istered! Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: Idmap module rid already registered! Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.567928, = 0] lib/module.c:69(do_smb_load_module) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.567928, 0] lib/module.c:69(do_smb_load_module) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: Module '/usr/local/lib/samba= /idmap/rid.so' initialization failed: NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: Module '/usr/local/lib/samba/idmap/rid.so' initialization failed: N= T_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.568051, = 1] winbindd/idmap.c:580(idmap_alloc_init) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: could not find idmap alloc m= odule idmap_rid:EXAMPLE=3D10000-20000 Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.571473, = 0] winbindd/idmap.c:201(smb_register_idmap_alloc) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.571473, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:201(smb_register_id= map_alloc) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: idmap_alloc module ldap alre= ady registered! Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: idmap_alloc module ldap already registered! Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.571564, = 0] winbindd/idmap.c:201(smb_register_idmap_alloc) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.571564, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:201(smb_register_id= map_alloc) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: idmap_alloc module tdb alrea= dy registered! Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: idmap_alloc module tdb already registered! Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.571612, = 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_idmap) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.571612, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_id= map) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: Idmap module passdb already = registered! Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: Idmap module passdb already registered! Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.571697, = 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_idmap) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.571697, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_id= map) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: Idmap module nss already reg= istered! Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: Idmap module nss already registered! Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.571776, = 1] winbindd/idmap.c:244(parse_idmap_module) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: idmap_init: idmap backend us= es deprecated 'idmap_' prefix. Please replace 'idmap_rid:EXAMPLE=3D10000-2= 0000' by 'rid:EXAMPLE=3D10000-20000' Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.571864, = 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_idmap) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.571864, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_id= map) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: Idmap module rid already reg= istered! Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: Idmap module rid already registered! Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.571911, = 0] lib/module.c:69(do_smb_load_module) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.571911, 0] lib/module.c:69(do_smb_load_module) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: Module '/usr/local/lib/samba= /idmap/rid.so' initialization failed: NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 934]: Module '/usr/local/lib/samba/idmap/rid.so' initialization failed: N= T_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: [2011/02/03 17:07:37.571965, = 1] winbindd/idmap.c:580(idmap_alloc_init) Feb 3 17:07:37 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25934]: could not find idmap alloc m= odule idmap_rid:EXAMPLE=3D10000-20000 Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25932]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.165476, = 0] winbindd/winbindd.c:195(winbindd_sig_term_handler) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 932]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.165476, 0] winbindd/winbindd.c:195(winbindd_sig= _term_handler) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25932]: Got sig[15] terminate (is_pa= rent=3D1) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 932]: Got sig[15] terminate (is_parent=3D1) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp smbd[25988]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.248114, 1] s= mbd/files.c:193(file_init) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp smbd[25988]: file_init: Information only: req= uested 16384 open files, 11075 are available. Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25993]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.282040, = 0] winbindd/winbindd_cache.c:3076(initialize_winbindd_cache) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 993]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.282040, 0] winbindd/winbindd_cache.c:3076(initi= alize_winbindd_cache) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25993]: initialize_winbindd_cache: c= learing cache and re-creating with version number 1 Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 993]: initialize_winbindd_cache: clearing cache and re-creating with vers= ion number 1 Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.398792, = 1] winbindd/idmap.c:438(idmap_init_passdb_domain) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: Could not init passdb idmap = domain Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.399131, = 1] winbindd/idmap.c:244(parse_idmap_module) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: idmap_init: idmap backend us= es deprecated 'idmap_' prefix. Please replace 'idmap_rid:EXAMPLE=3D100000-= 200000' by 'rid:EXAMPLE=3D100000-200000' Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.406877, = 0] winbindd/idmap.c:201(smb_register_idmap_alloc) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.406877, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:201(smb_register_id= map_alloc) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: idmap_alloc module ldap alre= ady registered! Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: idmap_alloc module ldap already registered! Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.407014, = 0] winbindd/idmap.c:201(smb_register_idmap_alloc) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.407014, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:201(smb_register_id= map_alloc) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: idmap_alloc module tdb alrea= dy registered! Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: idmap_alloc module tdb already registered! Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.407095, = 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_idmap) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.407095, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_id= map) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: Idmap module passdb already = registered! Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: Idmap module passdb already registered! Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.407172, = 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_idmap) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.407172, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_id= map) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: Idmap module nss already reg= istered! Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: Idmap module nss already registered! Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.407321, = 1] winbindd/idmap.c:244(parse_idmap_module) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: idmap_init: idmap backend us= es deprecated 'idmap_' prefix. Please replace 'idmap_rid:EXAMPLE=3D100000-= 200000' by 'rid:EXAMPLE=3D100000-200000' Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.407467, = 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_idmap) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.407467, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_id= map) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: Idmap module rid already reg= istered! Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: Idmap module rid already registered! Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.407551, = 0] lib/module.c:69(do_smb_load_module) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.407551, 0] lib/module.c:69(do_smb_load_module) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: Module '/usr/local/lib/samba= /idmap/rid.so' initialization failed: NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: Module '/usr/local/lib/samba/idmap/rid.so' initialization failed: N= T_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.407672, = 1] winbindd/idmap.c:580(idmap_alloc_init) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: could not find idmap alloc m= odule idmap_rid:EXAMPLE=3D100000-200000 Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.410954, = 0] winbindd/idmap.c:201(smb_register_idmap_alloc) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.410954, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:201(smb_register_id= map_alloc) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: idmap_alloc module ldap alre= ady registered! Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: idmap_alloc module ldap already registered! Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.411104, = 0] winbindd/idmap.c:201(smb_register_idmap_alloc) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.411104, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:201(smb_register_id= map_alloc) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: idmap_alloc module tdb alrea= dy registered! Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: idmap_alloc module tdb already registered! Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.411184, = 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_idmap) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.411184, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_id= map) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: Idmap module passdb already = registered! Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: Idmap module passdb already registered! Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.411265, = 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_idmap) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.411265, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_id= map) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: Idmap module nss already reg= istered! Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: Idmap module nss already registered! Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.411356, = 1] winbindd/idmap.c:244(parse_idmap_module) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: idmap_init: idmap backend us= es deprecated 'idmap_' prefix. Please replace 'idmap_rid:EXAMPLE=3D100000-= 200000' by 'rid:EXAMPLE=3D100000-200000' Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.411493, = 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_idmap) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.411493, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:149(smb_register_id= map) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: Idmap module rid already reg= istered! Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: Idmap module rid already registered! Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.411573, = 0] lib/module.c:69(do_smb_load_module) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.411573, 0] lib/module.c:69(do_smb_load_module) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: Module '/usr/local/lib/samba= /idmap/rid.so' initialization failed: NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25= 995]: Module '/usr/local/lib/samba/idmap/rid.so' initialization failed: N= T_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: [2011/02/03 17:08:25.411663, = 1] winbindd/idmap.c:580(idmap_alloc_init) Feb 3 17:08:25 gnv-ns2-tmp winbindd[25995]: could not find idmap alloc m= odule idmap_rid:EXAMPLE=3D100000-200000 Feb 3 17:09:04 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: pid 1530 (login), uid 0: exited on sign= al 11 (core dumped) Feb 3 17:09:53 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: pid 26004 (login), uid 0: exited on sig= nal 11 (core dumped) Feb 3 17:11:13 gnv-ns2-tmp kernel: pid 26007 (login), uid 0: exited on sig= nal 11 (core dumped) David M. Wassman, MCSE, CCENT, Security+ Carr, Riggs & Ingram, LLC 4010 NW 25th Place Gainesville, FL 32606 Voice: 352-372-6300 Fax: 352-375-1583 http://www.cricpa.com ***************************************************************************= *********************** In compliance with IRS Circular 230: Any statements or tax advice that are contained in this email are not inten= ded or written to be used, and cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purp= ose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidentia= l and protected from disclosure. It is intended exclusively for the individ= ual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain info= rmation that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legall= y exempt from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended= recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message= to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,= distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If y= ou have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately = by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. C= arr, Riggs & Ingram LLC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 06:15:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47C8106564A for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 06:15:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94618FC0A for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 06:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.27]) by qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 3iBt1g0010bG4ec56iFBbv; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 06:15:11 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 3iFA1g00W46zqiB3PiFBkz; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 06:15:11 +0000 Message-ID: <4D4B996D.4000407@comcast.net> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:15:09 -0800 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110131 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Why can't I install icu? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 06:15:12 -0000 Icu is a necessary dependency for Gimp, but I can't get it to install. I checked UPDATING and it states that icu4 is now deprecated, and one should install /devel/icu. But when I try to do that the file that is downloaded is icu4c, and the install goes along until it chokes with this error message: SUMMARY: ******* [Total error count: 1] Errors in [/tsformat/ccaltst/TestCalendar] Elapsed Time: 00:00:48.205 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/icu. Very frustrating. I need to get Gimp onto my computer, and I can install it as a package, but if I try to upgrade the program the upgrade always chokes on icu at the same place, and with the same error message. Anyone? Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 08:35:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4601D1065672 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 08:35:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B835F8FC0A for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 08:35:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PlH8C-0003o3-73 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:35:04 +0100 Received: from 93-139-225-172.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([93.139.225.172]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:35:04 +0100 Received: from gour by 93-139-225-172.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:35:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Gour Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 08:41:10 +0100 Lines: 51 Message-ID: <20110204084110.0dc8d3ff@atmarama.noip.me> References: <4D4B5E21.5060107@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/7Ot9jm2/kEO6p.SoDKOj/Ja"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 93-139-225-172.adsl.net.t-com.hr X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: 3Cy8q3pLN"sFiKpp%e^3=GTSm2xV5z:O1:| :WC~ei/w@ List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 08:35:06 -0000 --Sig_/7Ot9jm2/kEO6p.SoDKOj/Ja Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:02:09 -0800 Rem P Roberti wrote: > Now that I understand how to get a scanner working, if there are any=20 > photographers out there who are using scanners with FreeBSD for=20 > negatives or slides I would love to hear a recommendation. I have an=20 > Epson V500, but it is unsupported, and the only scanner that I have > that is supported is an old HP Scanjet 3970, which is a poor scanner > for doing negatives or slides. On Linux I'm very satisfied with VueScan (having Epson V700) which is, imho, much better than all the free-source tools, but wonder whether it works via Linux emulation? Sincerely, Gour --=20 Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA ---------------------------------------------------------------- --Sig_/7Ot9jm2/kEO6p.SoDKOj/Ja Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNS62WAAoJECrfh83NvxfK1zUP/1KBDVKN94NDCDf5PbmV431Z fIPHT3GR5PuK6nSOmOp9rPfBe5fpqvDu198MutVzOnJxP89WenrRGCtjqbQJz+B1 QBQHvy2PHNGivEz0zFczvdWF/u/PzDbYxL7hHOp0f5kyFBdtcmyeUm21Id8HaNdR IToo9Bc+OaEa6YvLcDcegT9Bl23bqWZUXPzZcBo9GkiZlia77pEYeL2B6AXePbrL /wO3dskwcZ2XZqYwtvBOlyRMxoGgdsELny6uVYAetWFehOKTWkXZ5HpfWhFsWg49 l1CkxQ+C6RfNczdvdL8Vn2NZ20b94uCiqc8RUqmMvHTh6/hoKEv2W25MmFuBglTW bu4kT2tYp16EIvM/NcFl5zk/5jPw1iYf/BiTMYxihGfawCdCc91G0IN2PuBXdwGn fI52AxpYrUr+XbIHKveEnl2odUSVze+6LdfOdQjYIzrIb+RWkjywp+rrBiFd7RBM /5x+S6ta4Kk0goJMC3qHIIGoDchmd6ixb5lDRlPj2J3HPMLb2qCPvm2DFT34ndSm /nx4OhYI3HbDSlQkvRfx32x72GazJugfmGsx3Jd9WeEQeKVcjK8vPSUDIfe23hWv kguiElB3AYAdMDDfbQ98wnkBesj1sot/Pk/Y4R/T6i3WMXUTxdR+dgqKgx+VQ/p3 w6SWIsl7lBpKicHFHB76 =YBQo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/7Ot9jm2/kEO6p.SoDKOj/Ja-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 09:30:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58604106566B for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:30:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [91.121.44.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 221928FC0A for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE9D6332C0; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 10:30:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122462CF69B; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 10:30:31 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 10:30:30 +0100 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: Rem P Roberti Message-ID: <20110204103030.7908fefe@davenulle.org> In-Reply-To: <4D4B996D.4000407@comcast.net> References: <4D4B996D.4000407@comcast.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Why can't I install icu? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:30:31 -0000 Le Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:15:09 -0800, Rem P Roberti a écrit : > Icu is a necessary dependency for Gimp, but I can't get it to > install. I checked UPDATING and it states that icu4 is now > deprecated, and one should install /devel/icu. But when I try to do > that the file that is downloaded is icu4c, and the install goes along > until it chokes with this error message: > > SUMMARY: > ******* [Total error count: 1] > Errors in > [/tsformat/ccaltst/TestCalendar] > Elapsed Time: 00:00:48.205 > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/icu. > > Very frustrating. I need to get Gimp onto my computer, and I can > install it as a package, but if I try to upgrade the program the > upgrade always chokes on icu at the same place, and with the same > error message. Are you using a locale? I've been hit in the past with bugs in the ICU tests suite when using fr_FR. It is just an idea... Regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 16:46:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC723106566C for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:46:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19678FC0C for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta17.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.73]) by qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 3rmA1g0071afHeLA9smchJ; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:46:36 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta17.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 3sma1g00W46zqiB8dsmbtJ; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:46:36 +0000 Message-ID: <4D4C2D6A.205@comcast.net> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 08:46:34 -0800 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110131 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick Lamaiziere References: <4D4B996D.4000407@comcast.net> <20110204103030.7908fefe@davenulle.org> In-Reply-To: <20110204103030.7908fefe@davenulle.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Why can't I install icu? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:46:37 -0000 > Le Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:15:09 -0800, > Rem P Roberti a écrit : > >> Icu is a necessary dependency for Gimp, but I can't get it to >> install. I checked UPDATING and it states that icu4 is now >> deprecated, and one should install /devel/icu. But when I try to do >> that the file that is downloaded is icu4c, and the install goes along >> until it chokes with this error message: >> >> SUMMARY: >> ******* [Total error count: 1] >> Errors in >> [/tsformat/ccaltst/TestCalendar] >> Elapsed Time: 00:00:48.205 >> *** Error code 1 >> Stop in /usr/ports/devel/icu. >> >> Very frustrating. I need to get Gimp onto my computer, and I can >> install it as a package, but if I try to upgrade the program the >> upgrade always chokes on icu at the same place, and with the same >> error message. > Are you using a locale? I've been hit in the past with bugs in the > ICU tests suite when using fr_FR. > > It is just an idea... Regards. > > > Interesting. When I installed 8.1 I naturally set my local area (west coast US) for the time zone. Is that what you refer to? I also scrolled further up the test list and found this, which is apparently where the test is failing: tsformat { ccaltst { TestCalendar { !! FAIL: ucal_getDefaultTimeZone() => U_BUFFER_OVERFLOW_ERROR } ---[1 ERRORS in /tsformat/ccaltst/TestCalendar] (13ms) Cheers... Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 16:53:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920E2106566C for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:53:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.27.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765C88FC1B for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:53:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta18.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.74]) by qmta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 3rmm1g0021bwxycAFst7T7; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:53:07 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta18.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 3st51g01g46zqiB8est6Rt; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:53:07 +0000 Message-ID: <4D4C2EF1.6060208@comcast.net> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 08:53:05 -0800 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110131 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gour References: <4D4B5E21.5060107@comcast.net> <20110204084110.0dc8d3ff@atmarama.noip.me> In-Reply-To: <20110204084110.0dc8d3ff@atmarama.noip.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Scanner recommendation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:53:08 -0000 >> Now that I understand how to get a scanner working, if there are any >> photographers out there who are using scanners with FreeBSD for >> negatives or slides I would love to hear a recommendation. I have an >> Epson V500, but it is unsupported, and the only scanner that I have >> that is supported is an old HP Scanjet 3970, which is a poor scanner >> for doing negatives or slides. > On Linux I'm very satisfied with VueScan (having Epson V700) which is, > imho, much better than all the free-source tools, but wonder whether > it works via Linux emulation? > I use Vuescan with Windoze, and you are right, it is infinitely better than any free source software. However, it is not available for use with FreeBSD. Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 17:24:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC061065670 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:24:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CBF8FC16 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:24:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PlPOi-00020n-Pe for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:24:40 +0100 Received: from 93-139-215-35.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([93.139.215.35]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:24:40 +0100 Received: from gour by 93-139-215-35.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:24:40 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Gour Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 18:24:10 +0100 Lines: 62 Message-ID: <20110204182410.412e584b@atmarama.noip.me> References: <4D4B5E21.5060107@comcast.net> <20110204084110.0dc8d3ff@atmarama.noip.me> <4D4C2EF1.6060208@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/7ESsfH/1RtQF54bxqA=NpSI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 93-139-215-35.adsl.net.t-com.hr X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: 3Cy8q3pLN"sFiKpp%e^3=GTSm2xV5z:O1:| :WC~ei/w@ List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:24:45 -0000 --Sig_/7ESsfH/1RtQF54bxqA=NpSI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 08:53:05 -0800 Rem P Roberti wrote: > I use Vuescan with Windoze, and you are right, it is infinitely > better than any free source software. =20 It's really puzzling how one-man shop can support write software which is so much better than any free software with support for so many scanners. =20 > However, it is not available for use with FreeBSD. I would not like to keep Windoze for one app, but curious if it would be possible to use VueScan via linux emulation on FreeBSD? Sincerely, Gour p.s. U+I've found some posts that VueScan might be working under Virtualbox, so if everything else fails, we'll keep Archlinux as guest OS. :-) --=20 Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA ---------------------------------------------------------------- --=20 Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA ---------------------------------------------------------------- --Sig_/7ESsfH/1RtQF54bxqA=NpSI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNTDY6AAoJECrfh83NvxfKI1UQAJGGW1Q7aJSD+sIf7Rar1iK+ Y9zqWuK+6BxvBBDaihUdY5tkUxBW3Q7Hw+eNFy0brrAf3svaFh3ljyG/yQU3XtVF ynaWiT2oUaBejEFTp8STYSy9AzSOYXwik3sgon8pL8Iy+DouDWfux3DqFAaKNOCQ 5by4wloMh3u5jf47RNYZKpW5zRqP77lRLimux4K3FVL/7/fhiG0320qOQg1MwMb5 du+vGBUdjfvuYQ6isvTI3DXjcmlidewNeeD/LuD1sT0aCrap+gViocnioXr+3N5A oio5cwhGjGz6knI/LFMth7jXgyEUzgZfrjtrVU8gN4sboVmkRbyweG0hVJ3ON6j4 fge91PTjyeErkFmRrfhznhTVmA2UJn3iGYawe/s8pORdnoz5g4TonTHnfz0uwbPg z0uZWyzRbgnpUdaoW9z68LmL+gaX1k1/iCjp/Z9Xch7iMIwo27XHnFKj+kkfuhJB dOc2FgKzoDlzsxTfBgnSgvNBE1y/oPf/SVBzrad/EuHVBmNQybxOHOxegl8P8+CB YRkIKM/nVJAIoxkPly4hzHuY7kz/rhjl4q9bCZVDovZeLFgDNOuO4exAneeijXVU 8momaMfkhlQAgRL1Q+WoeeY3h3KTBNfZrBZWo6gQuhyWWlKniuAVdqGuH0K3g8VL ZRva6yaACKWewWiMTuEx =+sHv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/7ESsfH/1RtQF54bxqA=NpSI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 17:27:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD50F1065670; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:27:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahman.linux@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8068FC0A; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxa40 with SMTP id 40so783880vxa.13 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:27:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=aUkxUN21kDbiioRrKBLWrfP/4kBcpXaZ+tJR3fO6xvA=; b=NX9OigNCZUq65MM7i/PPIs4gO4ciA4KjS+nQR2GErAER5FtiP6gfI3twU/Jl5pMMu7 5vjBlqrur+5uhAuF2xSwS9HFOzD4KzhJgUN7xm1AqJT0/j3BrZPBtSFuXYld9ZGIG7MG ITBeyajkXAQghHbZyChE57wbj1N1212RGVVMg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=iXWcivVwo4Or134ndxb4RM6V6wjcN07kOznatCfhPuX2HBjlNMGevijJRGGOxH1cQ6 5K2nz1G9VoV9sd62S7f6U2RmLa9Yo3W/lhKP77SojLKUftC+xQ3vQF83BKqlUa3MhSJz Ces+04rPKYvwUW7gtOPV1KhmevF74yt+zqe0g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.112.18 with SMTP id u18mr3135465vcp.261.1296840471546; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:27:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.175.197 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:27:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 20:57:51 +0330 Message-ID: From: Bahman Kahinpour To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: KDE on FreeBSD 8.1 - Akonadi Control Process Not Registered at D-Bus X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:27:53 -0000 Hello, I have installed X.org and KDE on my FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (directly from the packages collection on the Installation DVD-ROM) and I have taken these steps: +/etc/rc.conf: dbus_enable="YES" +/etc/rc.conf: hald_enable="YES" and also: I have added startkde4 to .xinitrc While using KDE, I continuously receive these errors: Akonadi Control Process Not Registered at D-Bus Akonadi Server Process Not Registered at D-Bus . . . What is this Akonadi problem all about? How may I fix this thing? Thanks Bahman Kahinpour From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 18:19:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0781065673 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 18:19:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bill@celestial.com) Received: from dorsai-02.celestial.com (dorsai-02.celestial.com [192.136.111.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023FD8FC12 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 18:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by dorsai-02.celestial.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1324720676D9 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:53:27 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at celestial.com Received: from dorsai-02.celestial.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dorsai-02.celestial.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Kcj6CkxHfwsH for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:53:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from ayn.mi.celestial.com (hayek.celestial.com [192.136.111.12]) by dorsai-02.celestial.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C920420676D5 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:53:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ayn.mi.celestial.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8E651319; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:53:26 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mi.celestial.com Received: from ayn.mi.celestial.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ayn.mi.celestial.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5taHKbgIXxmr; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:53:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by ayn.mi.celestial.com (Postfix, from userid 203) id B00E751326; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:53:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:53:26 -0800 From: Bill Campbell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110204175326.GA12226@ayn.mi.celestial.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4D4B5E21.5060107@comcast.net> <20110204084110.0dc8d3ff@atmarama.noip.me> <4D4C2EF1.6060208@comcast.net> <20110204182410.412e584b@atmarama.noip.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110204182410.412e584b@atmarama.noip.me> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 OpenPKG/CURRENT (2009-01-05) Subject: Re: Scanner recommendation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@celestial.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:19:36 -0000 On Fri, Feb 04, 2011, Gour wrote: >On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 08:53:05 -0800 >Rem P Roberti wrote: > >> I use Vuescan with Windoze, and you are right, it is infinitely >> better than any free source software. > >It's really puzzling how one-man shop can support write software which >is so much better than any free software with support for so many >scanners. Possibly because the author, Ed Hamrick, has more incentive than people writing free software? He has always been extremely good responding to my questions and requests regarding VueScan which I got originally for my Mac Mini when HP stopped supporting my old ScanJet. FWIW, I have been extremely disappointed with HP's driver support, particularly for older scanners. I had purchased a new ScanJet 5590 in April 2009 which worked fine with VueScan on top of HP's low-end drivers on my PPC Mac Mini running Leopard. When I got a new Macbook Pro in August 2009 running Snow Leopard, HP didn't have drivers for it, and their older drivers didn't work. Their web site said they would have Snow Leopard drivers in September or October of 2009, but they didn't come out until sometime in the 2nd quarter of 2010. For that reason, I will be looking at other hardware vendors the next time I'm in the market for a scanner. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@celestial.com Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way Voice: (206) 236-1676 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820 Fax: (206) 232-9186 Skype: jwccsllc (206) 855-5792 It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brushfires of freedom in the minds of men. -- Samuel Adams From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 18:44:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9435106566B for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 18:44:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from overlapped@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB838FC0A for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 18:44:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so2965559bwz.13 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:44:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc :references:in-reply-to:x-face:disposition-notification-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=JR4ZIrhUrHdtBdtYNJR8JaEZCqepRDe+SMW+CwcyEGI=; b=tYsy/NVdczPda2tnnjxTHfokL/z/uQ4NX2nIb+lymNmpcJT/swklm7RPDoOn+BA3rE C7W/hLeyUG8fenjVP/I/Mw3csdWO4rIRMsI0kQg1lG8KQ4Lyc6pxL9UtwSrqupX3wsE7 8zY5O1uELgj7swoctnEFii3WdjlEDTFgkKgdM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references :in-reply-to:x-face:disposition-notification-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=Pf+/jKbk6ibzpN72fOkmGXNzM8PLY724lw7Kn+US7wfngNDF/YQyAZaZm0vrP7oiwb 5P1tbl7/WWM2n0LoA5UCISk+9nlj9Bwr67TpQnEaN4Q9lM2FHK43Y/HnGd+gMlUID23o yZ3ZpMYaIer33IIZCx5UhMEaEj57Fxnpqxr9c= Received: by 10.204.66.130 with SMTP id n2mr1578852bki.175.1296843508918; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:18:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from karfagen.mshome (b-internet.213.228.88.104.snt.ru [213.228.88.104]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b6sm590580bkb.10.2011.02.04.10.18.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:18:28 -0800 (PST) From: Alexey Serebryakoff Organization: Home Server To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 00:23:31 +0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (FreeBSD/8.0-RELEASE-p4; KDE/4.4.4; i386; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: X-Face: "#M1JOx;_Lh}+n')7wLS*]1lI%"-oR2%nJ,j>x9tO:>9Cx" =?koi8-r?q?=0A=09vk?=>Vj4>yy@.iMoa$Z5gF\[~C35||9k4uBF+`C]~tn$u[!0u&Yx{w)A3KzfCor, Nj4oE8, =?koi8-r?q?n=0A=09vziH6+=7DESc=7D54y1=23Ro?=, S+i[_s$:1{G`SbN&Cyr0j+m-'uM!-IHOp&f\^lI9nK MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4359691.Rx50VLBTUV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201102050023.33370.overlapped@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Bahman Kahinpour Subject: Re: KDE on FreeBSD 8.1 - Akonadi Control Process Not Registered at D-Bus X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:44:51 -0000 --nextPart4359691.Rx50VLBTUV Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is my /etc/rc.conf =2E.. hald_enable=3D"YES" = = =20 polkitd_enable=3D"YES" = = =20 dbus_enable=3D"YES" = = =20 local_startup=3D"${local_startup} /usr/local/kde4/etc/rc.d" = = =20 kdm4_enable=3D"YES" =2E.. =46reeBSD karfagen.mshome 8.0-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p4 #1: Tue Jul= 27=20 21:49:43 NOVST 2010 karfagen.mshome:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KARFAGEN i386 =2D-=20 Best regards, Alexey Serebryakoff PGP Public Key: 0xB71BE1472B075100 =F7 =D3=CF=CF=C2=DD=C5=CE=C9=C9 =CF=D4 =F0=D1=D4=CE=C9=C3=C1 04 =C6=C5=D7= =D2=C1=CC=D1 2011 23:27:51 =C1=D7=D4=CF=D2 Bahman Kahinpour=20 =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC: > Hello, >=20 > I have installed X.org and KDE on my FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (directly > from the packages collection on the Installation DVD-ROM) and I have > taken these steps: > +/etc/rc.conf: dbus_enable=3D"YES" > +/etc/rc.conf: hald_enable=3D"YES" > and also: > I have added startkde4 to .xinitrc >=20 > While using KDE, I continuously receive these errors: > Akonadi Control Process Not Registered at D-Bus > Akonadi Server Process Not Registered at D-Bus > . > . > . >=20 > What is this Akonadi problem all about? How may I fix this thing? >=20 > Thanks > Bahman Kahinpour > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --nextPart4359691.Rx50VLBTUV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk1MRCUACgkQtxvhRysHUQB/sACfY7FPuWOXdKzk9gRZu4vyOu0P +a0AoJlzEeXoysx4aZPv6EcmfMeYbjss =EJ3a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4359691.Rx50VLBTUV-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 19:39:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B0F106566B for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 19:39:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88278FC13 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 19:39:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1PlRUs-0002gI-33>; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:39:10 +0100 Received: from e178011217.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.11.217] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1PlRUr-0004dh-W0>; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:39:10 +0100 Message-ID: <4D4C55DD.1070808@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:39:09 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110129 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Huff References: <4D491AB4.7090700@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <8662t2okjv.fsf@gmail.com> <4D4A6A5E.7030408@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <50051.212.1.112.9.1296724454.squirrel@mail.airbites.kh.ua> <19786.43478.21177.288707@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <19786.43478.21177.288707@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.11.217 Cc: Pavlo Greenberg , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Alexandre Subject: Re: editors/openoffice-org-3.3.0: serious issue with X11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 19:39:15 -0000 On 02/03/11 14:12, Robert Huff wrote: > Alexandre writes: > >> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Pavlo Greenbergwrote: >> >> > [SNIP] >> > But I'm agree with you, OOo's behavior after the last update is abnormal. >> >> Why not give a try to LibreOffice, that is in ports : >> http://www.freshports.org/editors/libreoffice/ > > I switched yesterday, having not known it was available. > It seems to work on all OOo-generated material (as one would > expect), and build cleanly and (subjectively) somewhat faster than > OO. (This is on an 4x3ghz amd64 machine with 8 gb of memory.) > > > Robert Huff > LibreOffice seems not to be that kind of 'replacement' I'd expected. Trying to start 'spadmin' for setting up printers fails with some libraries not found - I had to append paths to the right (weird) lib-path to /etc/ld-elf.so.conf. Done this, spadmin and sibblings will start but whatever I do have as printers (CUPS based on all of our systems), I'm incapable of having these printers for usage listed in LibreOffice! OpenOffice works fine. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 20:36:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D759106566B for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 20:36:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06678FC16 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 20:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywp6 with SMTP id 6so1133658ywp.13 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:36:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.106.4 with SMTP id e4mr7820661anc.81.1296851795209; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:36:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-070-216-068.nc.res.rr.com [71.70.216.68]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 17sm1286826anx.13.2011.02.04.12.36.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:36:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A17EE54824 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:36:32 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:36:23 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20110204153623.2fa2927a@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <201102050023.33370.overlapped@gmail.com> References: <201102050023.33370.overlapped@gmail.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/a2V6j.slm6pMn_h9==HqiiJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: KDE on FreeBSD 8.1 - Akonadi Control Process Not Registered at D-Bus X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:36:36 -0000 --Sig_/a2V6j.slm6pMn_h9==HqiiJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 00:23:31 +0600 Alexey Serebryakoff articulated: > This is my /etc/rc.conf >=20 > ... > hald_enable=3D"YES" = = =20 > polkitd_enable=3D"YES" = = =20 > dbus_enable=3D"YES" = = =20 > local_startup=3D"${local_startup} /usr/local/kde4/etc/rc.d" = = =20 > kdm4_enable=3D"YES" > ... I had a friend who had a problem with Akonadi also, although it was failing with MySQL and dbus. For whatever reason, he ran "mysql_upgrade", rebooted the system and the problem went away. Perhaps it was just a coincidence. In any event, he does not have a "polkitd_enable" statement in the rc.conf file, nor a "local_startup" one either. --=20 Jerry =E2=9C=8C FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ --Sig_/a2V6j.slm6pMn_h9==HqiiJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNTGNPAAoJEHdwsA8xwKhFT+UIAMiT3REC9v5MO2/VNSq5lawW Ct2q7HDGzMsCvp/fLBi5Juv7hV0pFy4mAxQ0M5Ff6yiX+wFOYWPsmeco3+wMiBn7 aUMtCX34+A26HYcJpgTjPjY31TYcOI8AvCEUXkkwKAoLb3tm0EU0vhMfV9CbkGeF IBGKTmaQmYtyIQ2OrFZZ0Q6BfkZNdsz7uGpsxQJZxnnpYgHAwr5QIhqo+tIUvwvd 5j9qqjm06uoVidKY4XxuhYCK/Jv5ezvEkgtj0U4LVkZM+XYtYnhgfndIp1R/xWO7 7OM+MUiB18rpI9cA4sxDQtEbucEIWVMy3kxYuyMGiJ3A4eTefliaSypM8ZHADbw= =fsXR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/a2V6j.slm6pMn_h9==HqiiJ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 22:10:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4131065673 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 22:10:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crtb@cape.com) Received: from mrelay1.cape.com (mrelay1.cape.com [216.237.97.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E208FC0C for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 22:10:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tomato (209-213-65-25.meganet.net [209.213.65.25]) by mrelay1.cape.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACC430E80A; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:53:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:53:15 -0500 (EST) From: Chuck Bacon X-X-Sender: crtb@tomato.local To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Chuck Bacon Subject: Why does my 8.2-RC3 dvd1 boot DOS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 22:10:45 -0000 I downloaded it yesterday. Here's the facts: 1. md5 matches CHECKSUM.MD5 2. When I boot off the BIOS, it takes a half minute or so, and then: voila! PC-DOS boots, and for all the world look as though it will boot a larger system; except it doesn't have a clue. Here's the hypothesis: The FreeBSD-8.3-RC3 boot loader doesn't satisfy my BIOS, and the BIOS looks through the dvd until it finds one of the DOS boot loaders provided by some fdisk variant. Any ideas why? If nothing else, I'll download disc1. Praps that'll work! Many thanks, Chuck Bacon -- crtb@cape.com ABHOR SECRECY -- DEFEND PRIVACY From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 23:02:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AC2106564A for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 23:02:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (craigslist.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418F38FC12 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 23:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id p14N3ZcI081924; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:03:35 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:03:35 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201102042303.p14N3ZcI081924@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, gour@atmarama.net In-Reply-To: <20110204182410.412e584b@atmarama.noip.me> Cc: Subject: Re: Scanner recommendation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 23:02:15 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Feb 4 11:26:25 2011 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > From: Gour > Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 18:24:10 +0100 > Subject: Re: Scanner recommendation > > --Sig_/7ESsfH/1RtQF54bxqA=NpSI > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: > quoted-printable > > On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 08:53:05 -0800 Rem P Roberti > wrote: > > > I use Vuescan with Windoze, and you are right, it is infinitely better > > than any free source software. =20 > > It's really puzzling how one-man shop can support write software which is > so much better than any free software with support for so many scanners. Money *IS* a poweful incentive. Somebody saying "I'll buy it, if it supports _this_ scanner" is motivation. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 23:59:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D4C106564A for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 23:59:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB3DB8FC15 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 23:59:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.52]) by qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 3zye1g00317UAYkA8zzUGY; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 23:59:28 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 3zzS1g00V46zqiB8ZzzTpr; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 23:59:28 +0000 Message-ID: <4D4C92DD.4070300@comcast.net> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:59:25 -0800 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110131 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Bonomi References: <201102042259.p14Mxc6c081870@mail.r-bonomi.com> In-Reply-To: <201102042259.p14Mxc6c081870@mail.r-bonomi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why can't I install icu? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 23:59:29 -0000 > *NO* he's refering to the _locale_, not the timezone. They're totally > separate and unrelated concepts. "Locale" is a means for specifying a > bunch of national/regional things. like what the currency symbol (dollar-, > pound-, euro-, yen-, whatever-sign) is, whether one uses ',' or '.' for > marking off thousands multiples in large numbers, whether one uses ',' or > '.' for the 'decimal point', etc., etc. The way the U.S. does things is > the default, so you'd probably never need to set the locale. do an > 'apropos locale', and read the manpages for the 'non-X' and 'non-perl' > items and you'll have the basis for an understanding of locale referenes. > > Got it. Another new learn. Still no luck installing /devel/icu. Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 01:04:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A40106564A for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:04:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620FA8FC15 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1514hTj027745; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 18:04:43 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p1514gqv027742; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 18:04:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 18:04:42 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Rem P Roberti In-Reply-To: <4D4C2EF1.6060208@comcast.net> Message-ID: References: <4D4B5E21.5060107@comcast.net> <20110204084110.0dc8d3ff@atmarama.noip.me> <4D4C2EF1.6060208@comcast.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:04:43 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Gour Subject: Re: Scanner recommendation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 01:04:47 -0000 On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Rem P Roberti wrote: >> On Linux I'm very satisfied with VueScan (having Epson V700) which is, >> imho, much better than all the free-source tools, but wonder whether >> it works via Linux emulation? >> > > I use Vuescan with Windoze, and you are right, it is infinitely better than > any free source software. However, it is not available for use with FreeBSD. If the Linux version won't run on FreeBSD, the Windows version may run in Wine. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 01:04:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555E81065693 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:04:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 141298FC12 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:04:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so1195083gyf.13 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:04:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=XwI/nl5Lx/YGRC3vgJiDJz9Bxo1qs8jcF16cv99neFM=; b=qyW1L32+UvH0Fn+NN1ks1Y8W/hE+vcPf1TcdBSHtuwJSHT5xgIooY0I3U1+XxhzRHW cz8213Hi48IcBxSYUWMTNrN1c/24xH3+9tiNOQTsepvi5YraduQ+wd9NIhMtx8GmCgOY /CijDSFBy+lZLvh0bTebi++GYW8tz7CFDwA+E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; b=ZZbjEHdKdj8iwbu0gnULA6rokdFghQWXw1wnsWAegtlausJtXppGVCy7tiruWRyNFc jwXieG4NvDIu8Ohw8/AoX0u8jdcVBceEFSzsSh9vN6QFoVcm4hI34Axh5XSQBRUz+q9/ XShaY0eQ0cFc4XF8p4hJDqzRPHTnQs80f5DWs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.103.38 with SMTP id e26mr3565399yhg.88.1296867067119; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:51:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.105.197 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:51:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 19:51:07 -0500 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: Rem P Roberti Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Why can't I install icu? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 01:04:58 -0000 > Icu is a necessary dependency for Gimp, but I can't get it to install. > I checked UPDATING and it states that icu4 is now deprecated, and one > should install /devel/icu. But when I try to do that the file that is > downloaded is icu4c, and the install goes along until it chokes with > this error message: > > SUMMARY: > ******* [Total error count: 1] > Errors in > [/tsformat/ccaltst/TestCalendar] > Elapsed Time: 00:00:48.205 > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/icu. > > Very frustrating. I need to get Gimp onto my computer, and I can > install it as a package, but if I try to upgrade the program the upgrade > always chokes on icu at the same place, and with the same error message. > > Anyone? Try again, with a clean build, after having made sure that you've removed all remnants of the earlier icu versions; and make a transcript of the build: pkg_delete -fv "icu2-*" "icu-*" script /tmp/icu.log make -C /usr/ports/devel/icu deinstall clean install exit If the problem still occurs, then you should file a problem report: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/problem-reports/article.html Make sure you attach the config.log from the failed build (look for it in the work directory of the port before cleaning up), as well as the transcript (/tmp/icu.log) of the failed build. If there aren't any pre-built binary packages of the latest versions of icu and gimp available, and you don't want to wait for them to be produced, or for the problem to be fixed; and (as apparently is the case) the build is working, but only the post-build tests are failing; then first disable the tests and then try to build and install icu. You can do that by editing the port Makefile and commenting-out the following line: post-build test regression-test: iotest cintltst intltest (Of course, this change will probably be wiped out each time you update your ports tree.) b. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 02:00:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E8D106566B for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 02:00:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (asmtp5.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170028FC18 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 02:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1515Emc030313; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:05:14 GMT Received: from orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (80-45-152-196.static.dsl.as9105.com [80.45.152.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1515EeH030309; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:05:14 GMT Received: by orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0A3B533C3D; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:05:14 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:05:14 +0000 From: Frank Shute To: Chuck Bacon Message-ID: <20110205010514.GA23857@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-RC2 amd64 X-Organisation: 'shute.org.uk' Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why does my 8.2-RC3 dvd1 boot DOS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 02:00:08 -0000 On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 04:53:15PM -0500, Chuck Bacon wrote: > > I downloaded it yesterday. Here's the facts: > > 1. md5 matches CHECKSUM.MD5 > > 2. When I boot off the BIOS, it takes a half minute or so, and > then: voila! PC-DOS boots, and for all the world look as > though it will boot a larger system; except it doesn't have > a clue. > > Here's the hypothesis: The FreeBSD-8.3-RC3 boot loader doesn't > satisfy my BIOS, and the BIOS looks through the dvd until it finds > one of the DOS boot loaders provided by some fdisk variant. > Any ideas why? > > If nothing else, I'll download disc1. Praps that'll work! > > Many thanks, Your BIOS isn't clever enough to look through the DVD and find an OS (an OS that's not shipped with FreeBSD AFAIK). The PC-DOS bootloader must reside in the boot blocks of your HDD or DVD. Sometimes manufacturers ship PC-DOS on the HDD if the machine comes with "no OS"; maybe that's what you are seeing. Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 02:08:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E112106566C for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 02:08:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22848FC13 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 02:08:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-143-131.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.143.131]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2B61E4F4; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 03:08:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id p1528njs005715; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 03:08:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 03:08:49 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Frank Shute Message-Id: <20110205030849.bf6049c0.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20110205010514.GA23857@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <20110205010514.GA23857@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Chuck Bacon Subject: Re: Why does my 8.2-RC3 dvd1 boot DOS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 02:08:53 -0000 On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:05:14 +0000, Frank Shute wrote: > Sometimes manufacturers ship PC-DOS on the HDD if the machine comes > with "no OS"; maybe that's what you are seeing. Or it could be part of a "service partition", a modern means to get rid of installation media to be shipped with PCs that come with an OEM provided OS. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 03:16:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E201B1065670 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 03:16:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remegius@comcast.net) Received: from qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.59.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4A48FC22 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 03:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.59]) by qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 43FW1g0061GhbT85D3GU3R; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 03:16:28 +0000 Received: from remegius.comcast.net ([67.180.204.190]) by omta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 43GS1g00g46zqiB3T3GUbt; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 03:16:28 +0000 Message-ID: <4D4CC109.4040102@comcast.net> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 19:16:25 -0800 From: Rem P Roberti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110131 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bf1783@gmail.com References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "b. f." , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Why can't I install icu? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 03:16:29 -0000 > Try again, with a clean build, after having made sure that you've > removed all remnants of the earlier icu versions; and make a > transcript of the build: > > pkg_delete -fv "icu2-*" "icu-*" > script /tmp/icu.log > make -C /usr/ports/devel/icu deinstall clean install > exit > > If the problem still occurs, then you should file a problem report: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/problem-reports/article.html > > Make sure you attach the config.log from the failed build (look for it > in the work directory of the port before cleaning up), as well as the > transcript (/tmp/icu.log) of the failed build. > > If there aren't any pre-built binary packages of the latest versions > of icu and gimp available, and you don't want to wait for them to be > produced, or for the problem to be fixed; and (as apparently is the > case) the build is working, but only the post-build tests are failing; > then first disable the tests and then try to build and install icu. > You can do that by editing the port Makefile and commenting-out the > following line: > > post-build test regression-test: iotest cintltst intltest > > (Of course, this change will probably be wiped out each time you > update your ports tree.) > > b. > Thank you for your excellent, detailed instructions. I have followed them to the letter. The build did not make after doing a pkg_delete and deinstall, so I sent a pr-send with a copy of the icu.log and config.log. BTW, the build failed at the same place it always has---during the test. I went ahead and commented out the suggested line in the Makefile and the install took place as expected. I realize that during subsequent upgrades I will have to do the same drill. Thanks again for your help. Cheers... Rem From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 03:59:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83721065789 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 03:59:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB698FC08 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 03:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so2845036iwn.13 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 19:59:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=FcqgeFpxB/OngdzHr7IPT4j25Kq0vHm7h5EPldwuLXM=; b=uU8pgzXSiezIzWZk60SWyvj1QhqMdiruwlJ4qQrFuYo4w4fuEAIEQO4GP15/6hGEpr GTZi21fxwsaV+UH2k6kGsKjmghWTFJAXFQpQ4n2DSZGZs9EC7wLBUmk1GuWEHt4jx+5A cG90RuFwLt+UFccH/HfMw983xuUd3Va8mf+kM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=QEu8pv8Ijlp9mtJHfFilXectDuy6uJMuddrTvavHzbaKqbG860vAQyLoR9MIp2Mxih v2eVNw8FWcOaeg7f6i/FA1N9g8EGd+pwJI8k1/veAUeCt7ATTLrexMKz3D2V69Mjkl5G vgsJBhp92BBmILCZO8yzFlnG4hhjldbI214N8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.192.73 with SMTP id dp9mr13908036ibb.20.1296876566520; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 19:29:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.144.11 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 19:29:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 22:29:26 -0500 Message-ID: From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: Chuck Bacon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why does my 8.2-RC3 dvd1 boot DOS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 03:59:20 -0000 On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Chuck Bacon wrote: > I downloaded it yesterday. Here's the facts: > > 1. md5 matches CHECKSUM.MD5 > > 2. When I boot off the BIOS, it takes a half minute or so, and > then: voila! PC-DOS boots, and for all the world look as > though it will boot a larger system; except it doesn't have > a clue. > > Here's the hypothesis: The FreeBSD-8.3-RC3 boot loader doesn't > satisfy my BIOS, and the BIOS looks through the dvd until it finds > one of the DOS boot loaders provided by some fdisk variant. > Any ideas why? > > If nothing else, I'll download disc1. Praps that'll work! > > Many thanks, > Chuck Bacon -- crtb@cape.com > ABHOR SECRECY -- DEFEND PRIVACY > In FreeBSD DVD , there is NO any PC-DOS . Please , check your BIOS boot device sequence list . In that list CD/DVD drive should come before HDD , if it exists in that list . If CD/DVD drive is listed before HDD , but it is NOT booting from DVD : Your DVD is NOT burned properly , or , your BIOS is NOT able to boot from DVD . In that case CD may be used . For that case , manual of your computer may be helpful to understand its booting ability . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 04:49:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8678D1065673 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 04:49:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rglowe@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F678FC16 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 04:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so3147960fxm.13 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:49:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RPuBUZn7ZZG37lW+e+CFdDzj1dg1EtAwKlO85rbEGT4=; b=n5DWNpUp1Hdg0BioFpDIkVhXGJM7TJ31LFuHWQ8fIgxs2B+VRNpuJVgRqIOZTgo0YY QTWS5Gy+ncwOg0mluv37gV98zgDLa0jVnqjqQ0VNngB+JfpAhspBQYXWvnQllsOxzpjy U3iE9zI3np/lvnaDeJt7JSP8OmzbsobqjNpCU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=o3cER6yZJTkAo3ZxH46YQQm0pcQ7EYC4dH75SMRqLqj75d4sJGhILxS/OL7oFobEyz yRGegJfjA33NxEsYKz8zGnm7fJyDoSXT/AY/cLUnt28PUOpTAsPHDxGAxLZ9NBYWoEAV 5LxdVivJ2X1TXcnhmqP+dTcaKgQvz6k9ilwTU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.98.204 with SMTP id r12mr12167965fan.102.1296879871085; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:24:31 -0800 (PST) Sender: rglowe@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.86.131 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 20:24:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 14:24:31 +1000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: lQKU9ypCTf1z92rpU9sCNFylUVw Message-ID: From: Rob To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: manual page formatting issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 04:49:43 -0000 Hi, I'm running FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (running on VMWare Server 2.0.2) and am having some odd issues the formatting of man pages. If I view a man page (as root) in the console it displays correctly. If I view the man page (again, as root) in a (PuTTY) terminal session, the bold formatting of the command line arguments is missing. See the following screen shot examples: Console: http://imageupload.org/?di=612968791464 Terminal: http://imageupload.org/?di=112968791464 In the console session I have the TERM=cons25. In the terminal session I have it set to TERM=xterm. My PuTTY settings are pretty much the default, including the "Connection->Data->Terminal-type string" set to xterm. The pager in both sessions is set to more. I've played around with various terminal settings, to no avail. Can someone please offer some pointers as to how I might fix this? Thanks, Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 05:07:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5275B106564A for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 05:07:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF47D8FC14 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 05:07:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so3155782fxm.13 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:07:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:x-authentication-warning:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=WnRAb7DCluEMSSX9hNNSeGVZefFHPLhkx/fHaXpbLQI=; b=qQ8T/TOUvT31jJItepXpJDvNpOxxzO0oeRWOcbgr3VlD8SYSYGA0eZGiUOF3xwHQQI ioj43ReU/L1Z8B1p7qgTc1DXceQ95zR3NgUnpCsnLt4Jfgqxes+GqeCCb/Fs8ExZYzoe l9DHVX5uRnSXOE2k4Wd3HDkV6gNQ1Y8/dhp50= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=x-authentication-warning:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=fX9+cbQkzWsVHQB0Nk1EjqY9e5FWLYkqqyuIWmB3KA3KIc1qvuTJ522HLwEHZuwmKq TtGGPGT8ZiGHL+EVK+6FhviSWcroqBOOck23J8DM+PjbSVRqJ6kAeKkwnrwYF94NjAXF YyzY/sy2vT1admFzeK2PmXeB9BCHKRXFBfPYI= Received: by 10.223.73.202 with SMTP id r10mr6469735faj.133.1296882424418; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:07:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from darklight.org.ru ([213.132.76.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f24sm496890fak.0.2011.02.04.21.07.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:07:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from darklight.org.ru (yuri@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by darklight.org.ru (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p15570Os003592; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 08:07:00 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: (from yuri@localhost) by darklight.org.ru (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p155702K003591; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 08:07:00 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: darklight.org.ru: yuri set sender to yuri.pankov@gmail.com using -f Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 08:07:00 +0300 From: Yuri Pankov To: Rob Message-ID: <20110205050527.GA1530@darklight.org.ru> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: manual page formatting issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 05:07:06 -0000 On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 02:24:31PM +1000, Rob wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (running on VMWare Server 2.0.2) and am > having some odd issues the formatting of man pages. > > If I view a man page (as root) in the console it displays correctly. If I > view the man page (again, as root) in a (PuTTY) terminal session, the bold > formatting of the command line arguments is missing. > > See the following screen shot examples: > > Console: http://imageupload.org/?di=612968791464 > > Terminal: http://imageupload.org/?di=112968791464 > > In the console session I have the TERM=cons25. > > In the terminal session I have it set to TERM=xterm. My PuTTY settings are > pretty much the default, including the "Connection->Data->Terminal-type > string" set to xterm. > > The pager in both sessions is set to more. > > I've played around with various terminal settings, to no avail. Can someone > please offer some pointers as to how I might fix this? > > Thanks, > Rob You probably forgot to change Window->Colors->Default Bold Foreground color values in PuTTY (works just fine here). HTH, Yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 07:15:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3ABF1065679 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 07:15:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D778FC17 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 07:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PlcMN-0003Md-FW for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 08:15:07 +0100 Received: from 93-139-215-35.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([93.139.215.35]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 08:15:07 +0100 Received: from gour by 93-139-215-35.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 08:15:07 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Gour Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 08:14:49 +0100 Lines: 48 Message-ID: <20110205081449.0d7011c2@atmarama.net> References: <20110204182410.412e584b@atmarama.noip.me> <201102042303.p14N3ZcI081924@mail.r-bonomi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/jaON13l/1YX2nVuufbavvpR"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 93-139-215-35.adsl.net.t-com.hr X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: 3Cy8q3pLN"sFiKpp%e^3=GTSm2xV5z:O1:| :WC~ei/w@ List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 07:15:09 -0000 --Sig_/jaON13l/1YX2nVuufbavvpR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:03:35 -0600 (CST) Robert Bonomi wrote: > Money *IS* a poweful incentive. >=20 > Somebody saying "I'll buy it, if it supports _this_ scanner" is > motivation. Well, I'm not astonished that he does it, but amazed that the whole open-source community behind SANE is so much behind one-man-shop. :-/ Sincerely, Gour --=20 Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA ---------------------------------------------------------------- --Sig_/jaON13l/1YX2nVuufbavvpR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNTPjpAAoJECrfh83NvxfKccIQAK6NW6Gfu7BXaV/telwB61l3 6dbd8HlY0iWS5wEDyB+THDf67B/0VMewU1pBWPE99NFq1syxYyGRffUtniXiqYcr lz2omdTvKgcm17SLLBIDhTHCIOfCwIqGoMPw3gVVV0eOCikkrpQMB9pMxdIs1gpi 3fuEvd5C9RmpVV1DYVUwbJflwaR98MZicKa8j1zyCfZasxWracbOkU0v7V+3faxN 5cSbDYmQVI7EVelP/BH5rVw4k05eVh2S4iOrY5vE8VYEKYlFuzmaRWMhvlmK95Ro ZPZSmr/wT4f1CWCfe2V/TjE4SLaeDQayQ45obkEe9p5lqi3DjN+wSn5z0+INGRzl XH/ZNPd05imEke+B2pw4xZIWcyjLXSIZpQWaE3Q7+DqUcV4+027GGEi6DS08TN3o qBwjdY3gwboHksLrSmcitjSR7S+Wc4PJRJ9HgKI4iz3x3uddCAzv09T2xXEYsO4M y0JKF3gYUKJpmzN939SeA9VOHt/WYSkS5AVLtdgPad8nvLRt7ymZRpYxfjRlRopR HYD0SSKr1OQgrr2tEJJXGxeeaAlpVEt0xGmaXGD0Q8DYDz9LhuBRgo9MtToIRudl wIyo1Neck4V9jpAxqV1Z1t4ql4cPk9r5uREpQNFfp1gSr/LxhfygUBYcJVRzg51s lFKV1vrnWxh31Y4v6/ne =zLCB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/jaON13l/1YX2nVuufbavvpR-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 09:00:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE87106566C for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 09:00:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F18D8FC0C for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 09:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p1590btl003059 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:00:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p1590bEk003058; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:00:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA28190; Sat, 5 Feb 11 00:54:25 PST Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 00:53:00 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com Message-Id: <4d4d0fec.HyCzRPm6kct8RHaK%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <201102042303.p14N3ZcI081924@mail.r-bonomi.com> In-Reply-To: <201102042303.p14N3ZcI081924@mail.r-bonomi.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, gour@atmarama.net Subject: Re: Scanner recommendation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 09:00:43 -0000 Robert Bonomi wrote: > Somebody saying "I'll buy it, if it supports _this_ scanner" > is motivation. So perhaps what is needed is for N FreeBSD users to say "I'll buy it, if it runs on FreeBSD." Any guesses on how large an N would be needed to provide sufficient motivation? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 09:06:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69EE81065670 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 09:06:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rglowe@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00998FC08 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 09:06:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so3259831fxm.13 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 01:06:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=L9uwscp6+KNnXef2gP5L77vnytGJ/ADWfn5qxQT6pFE=; b=STH6YtmiDcZiBthy+8KMMgZYrx8775LUpy8/41DzK3dDutRrERfAhDba+B/Cd4UM5v MOosuaTYfx7NqSKSeehmkHBMR1cejDOC5RB0qVnHuGhdZz+iUSB0OdzKPAGy4rs2RTTf bbVx5ZSMbiK5IoFTOEY3fH2ZjomYFxdxJyELs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=NiRb6OmxFlA1+zKn+zQFwMlRNAaQ2dLVQI/FNcCCLNTOm1tRxfBZ2lKEYJBxiv6riw nKB+otD2CTXFDJkuUoD8D0o3p4wIIPNHf7FdV8WTGwoIwRGt/LchkbwMmFFWhKDg7G7r EPJj0OE9zLzi66l+gYZd2Fb//8XaCZ5zCmMIg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.81.76 with SMTP id w12mr1614038fak.26.1296896799911; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 01:06:39 -0800 (PST) Sender: rglowe@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.86.131 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:06:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110205050527.GA1530@darklight.org.ru> References: <20110205050527.GA1530@darklight.org.ru> Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 19:06:39 +1000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: M_OcYoZjefT7nMjMQvpl4-jYuGM Message-ID: From: Rob To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: manual page formatting issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 09:06:42 -0000 Yep, that was it. Thanks very much Yuri. On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Yuri Pankov wrote: > On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 02:24:31PM +1000, Rob wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm running FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE (running on VMWare Server 2.0.2) and am > > having some odd issues the formatting of man pages. > > > > If I view a man page (as root) in the console it displays correctly. If I > > view the man page (again, as root) in a (PuTTY) terminal session, the > bold > > formatting of the command line arguments is missing. > > > > See the following screen shot examples: > > > > Console: http://imageupload.org/?di=612968791464 > > > > Terminal: http://imageupload.org/?di=112968791464 > > > > In the console session I have the TERM=cons25. > > > > In the terminal session I have it set to TERM=xterm. My PuTTY settings > are > > pretty much the default, including the "Connection->Data->Terminal-type > > string" set to xterm. > > > > The pager in both sessions is set to more. > > > > I've played around with various terminal settings, to no avail. Can > someone > > please offer some pointers as to how I might fix this? > > > > Thanks, > > Rob > > You probably forgot to change Window->Colors->Default Bold Foreground > color values in PuTTY (works just fine here). > > > HTH, > Yuri > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 09:27:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1340106564A for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 09:27:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8C08FC0C for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 09:27:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PleQA-00065M-SJ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:27:10 +0100 Received: from 93-139-215-35.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([93.139.215.35]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:27:10 +0100 Received: from gour by 93-139-215-35.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:27:10 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Gour Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 10:26:54 +0100 Lines: 57 Message-ID: <20110205102654.3b005c10@atmarama.net> References: <201102042303.p14N3ZcI081924@mail.r-bonomi.com> <4d4d0fec.HyCzRPm6kct8RHaK%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/cU6Q6L8XeNyEqTP_R02ZHCP"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 93-139-215-35.adsl.net.t-com.hr X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: 3Cy8q3pLN"sFiKpp%e^3=GTSm2xV5z:O1:| :WC~ei/w@ List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 09:27:12 -0000 --Sig_/cU6Q6L8XeNyEqTP_R02ZHCP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 00:53:00 -0800 perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > So perhaps what is needed is for N FreeBSD users to say "I'll buy > it, if it runs on FreeBSD." Any guesses on how large an N would > be needed to provide sufficient motivation? Heh...when I asked Ed about support for 64-bit version of VueScan, his reply was that number of Linux users is so low that he is considering whether to even support the OS. Fortunately, in the meantime, he added 64bit Linux support, but I'm not sure what he would say to add FreeBSD support considering general popularity of Linux vs. BSD. :) Sincerely, Gour --=20 Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA ---------------------------------------------------------------- --=20 Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA ---------------------------------------------------------------- --Sig_/cU6Q6L8XeNyEqTP_R02ZHCP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIbBAEBAgAGBQJNTRfeAAoJECrfh83NvxfKNJ0P9joc0XscdhEaxf36zRgqN5hf v72JRSVjeShvWg4x+AM7EqY+g1mthiBi6zkBqw7WLIC8ET0U9uNap4G/FRQdHus9 33ofeP+uoE0CnlcWnSRvJ7bYsvGiDa40LwKV9sKTYYVH1eNSy1QZGD36a690POaA sikNqFeE7N+LHBtt5LUBLyoVtc1X5EwtYAFeCbFbt5K/onZhdUbDwTFRNg6BRFcc Pxhts3aQMgW7vHlvw8ZbV7xokASaP9QYXbU4fvJqqUingpAzOpD93OSmdXdUG3AP o335SK7MbPyoy2HWkCed2tnKsk8cKUt/4orJQar3qeoRuEuXgM01W8ZIP91TtTiB mKew77FLLUBz/giDt33FmYBhM9yWHsTinbgSoB2ShrjAieUmXJzYgeZskUwY+9IX 7xzuYDnQzzpTxOSdtyErcNwe9n8BDfCuvWuz+5IfcFpTm7z6Rr3SaTYO4VgYVTf+ 6fI7qE7YdSArDFif1Z5XCxCSKdWVfE/Km/zxttg585Y2kFLhHc59vqI/JHhEG+s+ UPhSewjrdoQLOCVsZ6iiHzXAMIpt2FTQc9ojRUXm1gj9oQIWFqZ4Qn20+Rtgglxp JJXkCDDeY+9cLkEsUrnK9Nu1qiDuHWMtKq53MxKTAeJLqL5DsTZYAZXs+UtO5oeq AKGZFHM/QTU9TGamxgE= =ljde -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/cU6Q6L8XeNyEqTP_R02ZHCP-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 10:38:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A749A106566B for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 10:38:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi.sergio@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4C08FC13 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 10:38:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so1279948gyf.13 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 02:38:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references :content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=bq1TWnCcLoEIwcWW1UKmGVumCr0FV1zqAgm6MK52+p8=; b=tjTxdE2SsDDpzGlZyCF1NxKsZT0tjVvYum5Rlu6mtinc9ZmEHn5lXq2G1KXihca0O6 5gPn8hH9zyr7/Eoej3cXUDVHEtlqRCExWGJa5GzEGfsGcLCriW61lEjCTjdEuJI6Fr9Y GJSwjxc8Loj44SbLEPGMKTVw+C99PC3rSNPVo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer; b=ZY5MWCcV0iRIY38FWG6OaxGsnO/tFx4FbIvxwbN+HJslgLsLDTjGupKQuTrpDlITCg JrASnnZI7z6tfit7w9ZqUXyI0DEt6Fg6NleBg6aOtQFSSp0JOADeqOvYIiCJiIjn8eWj nBhYog5XJg+DJTgtv85zLlup1NxiLbCuKcvG4= Received: by 10.90.78.10 with SMTP id a10mr16842752agb.89.1296902317543; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 02:38:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.6.230] ([201.21.166.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w6sm2204869anf.6.2011.02.05.02.38.35 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 05 Feb 2011 02:38:36 -0800 (PST) From: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4d4d0fec.HyCzRPm6kct8RHaK%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <201102042303.p14N3ZcI081924@mail.r-bonomi.com> <4d4d0fec.HyCzRPm6kct8RHaK%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 08:38:32 -0200 Message-ID: <1296902312.20328.13.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Scanner recommendation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:38:38 -0000 Em Sáb, 2011-02-05 às 00:53 -0800, perryh@pluto.rain.com escreveu: > Robert Bonomi wrote: > > > Somebody saying "I'll buy it, if it supports _this_ scanner" > > is motivation. > > So perhaps what is needed is for N FreeBSD users to say "I'll buy > it, if it runs on FreeBSD." Any guesses on how large an N would > be needed to provide sufficient motivation? My experience (many, many years) says that the question is something different: How much $$$ do you need to produce (compile) a FreeBSD version??? 300, 500, 5000??? Money talks. If ou make this question to Adobe, they will never hear you, but a small company (Ed) may be he will. As FreeBSD comes out with a new version about a year (or two..) 7.x -> 8.x -> 9.x a version of the sofware needs to be done (compiled) seldom. Let's say the ammount of money that interests Ed is US$5000.00 I am considering this kind of approach, various: 1) collect money in the freebsd community US$10 each you would need only 500 persons 2) Found an org, and using tax reduction program to finance software: here is is possible... Any new ideas??? Sergio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 12:40:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7C9106564A for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 12:40:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0978FC08 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 12:40:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.37]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 05 Feb 2011 07:40:39 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id ASH74178; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 07:39:51 -0500 Received-SPF: None identity=pra; client-ip=209.6.91.204; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-sender="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.6.91.204; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-sender="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None identity=helo; client-ip=209.6.91.204; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-sender="postmaster@jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received: from 209-6-91-204.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.91.204]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 05 Feb 2011 07:39:52 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19789.17673.156683.275881@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 07:39:37 -0500 To: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi In-Reply-To: <1296902312.20328.13.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> References: <201102042303.p14N3ZcI081924@mail.r-bonomi.com> <4d4d0fec.HyCzRPm6kct8RHaK%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <1296902312.20328.13.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Scanner recommendation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 12:40:41 -0000 Sergio de Almeida Lenzi writes: > As FreeBSD comes out with a new version about a year (or two..) > 7.x -> 8.x -> 9.x a version of the sofware needs to be done > (compiled) seldom. If the program is well-written, it may well be that re-compiling is all that needs to be done. (And I believe tha goal for new .0 versions is more like 18-24 months.) > 2) Found an org, and using tax reduction program to finance > software: here is is possible... > > Any new ideas??? Yes: skip phase 2. Have a person with s good reputation agree to do the work - accept pledges, talk to the author, then collect and transfer money. In the U.S., there's no reason not to ... but there's no strong reason to, either. Respectfully, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 17:56:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5BE106566C; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 17:56:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204618FC13; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 17:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so3397489wyf.13 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 09:56:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=XEzPkRyxftEzkUO0coEOeCKKTrrOK8CpqT3mgpLc7gk=; b=pk9L8FPr85tCBamvQZnb0zzGmarAG18rU9ZJ/cZ67ODYmElokae72fMRHVdh1hJIPK aiGhJxYLvMbpNLvzfoK3Kyrc38PwFMmgcuU0CC6G+axDCqM3+7Q/QI/08Xu4UyvRBbNQ LTzp7KrU37BNtU8glEj1d2qC7QHb5adRFTQdg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=aygts4w44tHOIvaieZkRXnYGuMYQe5JNjlXOi3eFR86uGY2WdoUIB0sncT2JIB9kP+ 5DREXFFlVkrFX8LUrJI9Io9IMq57rNf/11nE+bdeNCQeTezDmBgB7x0Vou+cPmodNBS3 k5abHZjtgF69Nj3FQ/gygmUH6jscSpZAbMO2U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.13.194 with SMTP id b44mr11953065web.68.1296928569107; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 09:56:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.80.147 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 09:56:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 17:56:09 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Ivan Voras Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4k drives and zfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 17:56:11 -0000 On 2 February 2011 15:20, krad wrote: > On 2 February 2011 12:18, Ivan Voras wrote: >> On 02/02/2011 05:52, krad wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> A quick question. Im upgrading my filer at home to have 2x 2tb samsung >>> F4EG drives. I believe these are 4k drives. I'm intending to use the >>> gnop trick to get zfs ashift to 12. Will this make my pool unbootable. >>> I have read a few threads aluding to this. >> >> There have been bugs which make such drives unbootable but they have been >> fixed at least in CURRENT (I haven't tried it). >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > where they related to any type of pools in particular as im just mirroring > well they are in. i tested with the gnop trick and without. It didnt seem to make much difference to the performance of the drives. Certainly not enough for me to worry about. Thinking about it though as I was addin it to the existing pool as a mirror and then dropping the old drives out one by one, i was probably forced into the 512k sectors anyway. Just finishing up now by filling the pool with urandom, and reading it back. Its taking a while though. Do these values seem similar to what others get? Bare in mind I have a dd of /dev/zero and /dev/urandom running in parallel with a bs=128k # zpool iostat system 5 capacity operations bandwidth pool used avail read write read write ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- system 1.12T 709G 149 212 8.48M 15.8M system 1.12T 708G 2 336 2.44K 30.2M system 1.12T 708G 2 541 3.12K 57.0M system 1.12T 708G 1 349 6.05K 32.8M system 1.12T 708G 1 581 599 62.9M system 1.12T 707G 3 320 5.46K 30.7M # iostat -d 5 ad4 ad5 ad6 ad7 KB/t tps MB/s KB/t tps MB/s KB/t tps MB/s KB/t tps MB/s 92.50 10 0.93 102.35 245 24.50 91.86 10 0.93 102.02 246 24.49 0.00 0 0.00 106.64 268 27.95 0.00 0 0.00 115.60 413 46.64 0.00 0 0.00 109.72 590 63.19 0.00 0 0.00 103.79 437 44.33 0.00 0 0.00 113.48 349 38.72 0.00 0 0.00 115.70 432 48.84 0.00 0 0.00 106.66 547 57.02 0.00 0 0.00 103.98 461 46.84 0.00 0 0.00 117.52 406 46.62 0.00 0 0.00 117.12 407 46.59 0.00 0 0.00 110.43 565 60.92 0.00 0 0.00 109.64 601 64.37 0.00 0 0.00 119.11 282 32.81 0.00 0 0.00 117.87 254 29.27 # zpool status pool: system state: ONLINE scrub: scrub completed after 2h2m with 0 errors on Sat Feb 5 11:47:21 2011 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM system ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 label/red ONLINE 0 0 0 label/blue ONLINE 0 0 0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 19:43:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D6D106566C for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 19:43:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@vfemail.net) Received: from vfemail.net (dotsevenfive.vfemail.net [69.11.239.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDBF28FC12 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 19:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51459 invoked by uid 89); 5 Feb 2011 19:43:26 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO freequeue.vfemail.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Feb 2011 19:43:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 51432 invoked by uid 89); 5 Feb 2011 19:43:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www-51-2.vfemail.net) (vfemail@172.16.100.51) by FreeQueue with SMTP; 5 Feb 2011 19:43:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 39124 invoked by uid 89); 5 Feb 2011 19:43:16 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 39106, pid: 39121, t: 0.2898s scanners:none Received: from unknown (HELO Bacchus.vfemail.net) (cGV0ZXJAdmZlbWFpbC5uZXQ=@67.101.12.44) by 172.16.100.51 with ESMTPA; 5 Feb 2011 19:43:15 -0000 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:42:47 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: peter@vfemail.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <20110205194334.33D6D106566C@hub.freebsd.org> Subject: Trying to Make an Alias Execute a Perl Script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 19:43:34 -0000 I have a couple of entries in my /etc/mail/aliases that manipulate the contents of an e-mail message. For example, file: "| cat > /home/user/file.incoming" receives an e-mail message and writes it to the hard drive. Another example: format: "| sed 's/^.$/~~/g' | sed 's/^$/~~/g' | tr -s ' ' ' ' | fmt 63 64 | sed 's/^ *//g' | tr '~' '\\012\' | mail user" receives a message, reformats the contents, and sends the reformatted material back to me by e-mail. I'm trying to create a new alias that will receive an e-mail message, use a Perl command to scan for for all e-mail addresses, and return a list of any e-mail addresses found to me by e-mail. This little Perl command does a great job of identifying e-mail addresses and producing a list of them: perl -wne 'while(/[\S\.]+@[\S\.]+\w+/g){print "$&\n"}' and I can use this from the command line these ways to extract e-mail addresses from a file: perl -wne 'while(/[\S\.]+@[\S\.]+\w+/g){print "$&\n"}' datafile perl -wne 'while(/[\S\.]+@[\S\.]+\w+/g){print "$&\n"}' < datafile cat datafile | perl -wne 'while(/[\S\.]+@[\S\.]+\w+/g){print "$&\n"}' I've tried this entry in my /etc/mail/aliases file, but it returns an empty e-mail messages: extract: "| perl -wne 'while(/[\S\.]+@[\S\.]+\w+/g){print "$&\n"}' | mail user" I tried modifying it to create a datafile and then examine the datafile: extract: "| cat > datafile | perl -wne 'while(/[\S\.]+@[\S\.]+\w+/g){print "$&\n"}' < datafile | mail user" but it is still returning an empty e-mail message rather than a list of e-mail addresses. What am I overlooking? ------------------------------------------------- This message sent via VFEmail.net http://www.vfemail.net $14.95 Lifetime accounts! 15GB disk! No bandwidth quotas! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 20:22:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA35106564A for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 20:22:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dieterbsd@engineer.com) Received: from imr-ma06.mx.aol.com (imr-ma06.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CC38FC13 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 20:22:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imo-da02.mx.aol.com (imo-da02.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.200]) by imr-ma06.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p15KMU9w020267; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 15:22:30 -0500 Received: from dieterbsd@engineer.com by imo-da02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id n.f11.11a3558c (34934); Sat, 5 Feb 2011 15:22:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtprly-dd03.mx.aol.com (smtprly-dd03.mx.aol.com [205.188.84.131]) by cia-da04.mx.aol.com (v129.8) with ESMTP id MAILCIADA047-d4054d4db17d167; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 15:22:25 -0500 Received: from web-mmc-m06 (web-mmc-m06.sim.aol.com [64.12.224.139]) by smtprly-dd03.mx.aol.com (v129.8) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDD031-d4054d4db17d167; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 15:22:21 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 15:22:21 -0500 X-AOL-IP: 67.206.164.162 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI Received: from 67.206.164.162 by web-mmc-m06.sysops.aol.com (64.12.224.139) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Sat, 05 Feb 2011 15:22:21 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: dieterbsd@engineer.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Mail.com Webmail 33189-STANDARD Message-Id: <8CD938986F06744-660-2F4AE@web-mmc-m06.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag: NO X-AOL-SENDER: dieterbsd@engineer.com Cc: freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com Subject: Why does printf(9) hang network? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 20:22:40 -0000 Why would doing a printf(9) in a device driver (usb, firewire, probably others) cause an obscenely long lockout on /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_sockbuf.c:148 (sx:so_rcv_sx) ? Printf(9) alone isn't the problem, adding printfs to chown(2) does not cause the problem, but printfs from device drivers do. Grep says that uipc_sockbuf.c is the only file that locks/unlocks sb_sx. The device drivers and printf don't even know that sb_sx exists. 135 int 136 sblock(struct sockbuf *sb, int flags) 137 { 138 139 KASSERT((flags & SBL_VALID) =3D=3D flags, 140 ("sblock: flags invalid (0x%x)", flags)); 141 142 if (flags & SBL_WAIT) { 143 if ((sb->sb_flags & SB_NOINTR) || 144 (flags & SBL_NOINTR)) { 145 sx_xlock(&sb->sb_sx); 146 return (0); 147 } 148 return (sx_xlock_sig(&sb->sb_sx)); 149 } else { 150 if (sx_try_xlock(&sb->sb_sx) =3D=3D 0) 151 return (EWOULDBLOCK); 152 return (0); 153 } 154 } More info at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D118093 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 21:48:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0526E106566C for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 21:48:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fred@blakemfg.com) Received: from mail.getnet.net (mail.getnet.net [216.19.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A08F98FC19 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 21:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24014 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2011 21:48:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Feb 2011 21:48:24 -0000 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at getnet.net Received: from mail.getnet.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.getnet.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yHoCdjUK4VBx for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 14:48:23 -0700 (MST) Received: (qmail 24009 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2011 21:48:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blakemfg.com) (fredb@216.19.219.132) by mail.getnet.net with ESMTPA; 5 Feb 2011 21:48:23 -0000 Sender: fred Message-ID: <4D4DC23E.5C7F0654@blakemfg.com> Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:33:50 -0700 From: Fred Boatwright X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.6 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: nedit problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 21:48:26 -0000 Hello, After updating all ports on 8.1-RELEASE, nedit has a problem. The right mouse button works ok in the toolbar but if it is pressed in the text area, for example to copy a block of text, the cursor changes shape and the X session becomes completely locked up. I have to stop X and restart it. I have tried to deinstall nedit and rebuild it but this didn't help. It is nedit-5.5 with Motif 2.2.3. Also, when nedit is started the following warnings are given: Cannot convert string "-*-helvetica-medium-r-normal-*-*-120-*-*-*-iso8859-1" to type FontStruct Cannot convert string "-*-helvetica-bold-r-normal-*-*-120-*-*-*-iso8859-1" to type FontStruct Cannot convert string "-*-helvetica-medium-o-normal-*-*-120-*-*-*-iso8859-1" to type FontStruct Cannot convert string "-*-courier-medium-r-normal-*-*-120-*-*-*-iso8859-1" to type FontStruct Cannot convert string "-*-courier-bold-r-normal-*-*-120-*-*-*-iso8859-1" to type FontStruct Cannot convert string "-*-courier-medium-o-normal-*-*-120-*-*-*-iso8859-1" to type FontStruct These warnings have been happening for some time but nedit otherwise has been working ok until the port update. xpdf gives similar warnings but seems to work ok. What can I do to resolve at least the lockup problem? Best regards, Fred From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 21:54:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A771065693 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 21:54:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4F18FC18 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2011 21:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Plq4x-0005lj-5K for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 22:54:03 +0100 Received: from cpe-188-129-80-149.dynamic.amis.hr ([188.129.80.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 22:54:03 +0100 Received: from ivoras by cpe-188-129-80-149.dynamic.amis.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 22:54:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 22:53:46 +0100 Lines: 44 Message-ID: References: <8CD938986F06744-660-2F4AE@web-mmc-m06.sysops.aol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpe-188-129-80-149.dynamic.amis.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: <8CD938986F06744-660-2F4AE@web-mmc-m06.sysops.aol.com> Subject: Re: Why does printf(9) hang network? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 21:54:06 -0000 On 05/02/2011 21:22, dieterbsd@engineer.com wrote: > Why would doing a printf(9) in a device driver (usb, firewire, probably > others) cause an obscenely long lockout on > /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_sockbuf.c:148 (sx:so_rcv_sx) ? You should ask this question on freebsd-hackers@. > > Printf(9) alone isn't the problem, adding printfs to chown(2) does not > cause the problem, but printfs from device drivers do. > > Grep says that uipc_sockbuf.c is the only file that locks/unlocks sb_sx. > The device drivers and printf don't even know that sb_sx exists. > > 135 int > 136 sblock(struct sockbuf *sb, int flags) > 137 { > 138 > 139 KASSERT((flags& SBL_VALID) == flags, > 140 ("sblock: flags invalid (0x%x)", flags)); > 141 > 142 if (flags& SBL_WAIT) { > 143 if ((sb->sb_flags& SB_NOINTR) || > 144 (flags& SBL_NOINTR)) { > 145 sx_xlock(&sb->sb_sx); > 146 return (0); > 147 } > 148 return (sx_xlock_sig(&sb->sb_sx)); > 149 } else { > 150 if (sx_try_xlock(&sb->sb_sx) == 0) > 151 return (EWOULDBLOCK); > 152 return (0); > 153 } > 154 } > > More info at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118093 > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >