From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 00:56:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD23106566B for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 00:56:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702A08FC0C for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 00:56:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4T0uh9U003154; Sat, 28 May 2011 18:56:43 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p4T0uhAN003151; Sat, 28 May 2011 18:56:43 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 18:56:43 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Antonio Olivares In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 28 May 2011 18:56:43 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Out of Range ..., troubleshoot xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 00:56:45 -0000 On Sat, 28 May 2011, Antonio Olivares wrote: > I have a machine that was working fine with a flat panel monitor at > work. I brought the machine home to connect to a TV with PC input and > I get Out of Range message. X does not start. Remove the Modes setting in xorg.conf and let X figure it out based on the monitor's EDID data. For example, leaving out the Screen section entirely has worked for me with monitors from 1024x768 up to 1920x1200 or so. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 01:18:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB871065670 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 01:18:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5B68FC13 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 01:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so3122268bwz.13 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 18:18:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fEq/lkAAxnakx0ndUYkccRA4VRLA2KP7Qws1mWsTopw=; b=WJgzrOSMJbXuKwDOdosBAM+3RqiB71afyVeH+mNRAQwUBckV/D2NPX5aGCEYbTsDYz DnCWJnDBpdIu7j9K8lpLP0tEuteq7EdySACOdEy36IxUZKuWkVHgpC6c5kg1F2CjJ185 eQuHUzkihzTVY00iiPvOxj9+iglaj6jcd6T3c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gkpadCxetxpgjwjQFy9hNqPDQ2t8Ghc0K+Cb5imfoAg2lHIuTDvpxOAJ1g56ilJqE5 Yf/qEmAyJuZI6CPZqeH+pHQlaS9xueBD1ATq/XxhNuJTDnaywdXPDFzlqzsfhBsvfudv TRQxhzqQjYIfFMjBgqo2FviiPEwnhfgp7H7P8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.83.212 with SMTP id g20mr2966655bkl.55.1306631909722; Sat, 28 May 2011 18:18:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.176.82 with HTTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 18:18:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 01:18:29 +0000 Message-ID: From: Antonio Olivares To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Out of Range ..., troubleshoot xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 01:18:31 -0000 On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Warren Block wrote: > On Sat, 28 May 2011, Antonio Olivares wrote: > >> I have a machine that was working fine with a flat panel monitor at >> work. =A0I brought the machine home to connect to a TV with PC input and >> I get Out of Range message. =A0X does not start. > > Remove the Modes setting in xorg.conf and let X figure it out based on th= e > monitor's EDID data. =A0For example, leaving out the Screen section entir= ely > has worked for me with monitors from 1024x768 up to 1920x1200 or so. > I have no Xorg.conf file and I try to generate it, it the process just hangs :(, # Xorg -configure and then test the /root/xorg.conf.new file with the given command returns Monitor out of Range. in the xorg.conf file, there is no Monitor Name and Monitor Model, the lines are empty with no HorizSync or VertRefresh. I try the same with a livecd(linux) and I don't get a HorizSync or VertRefresh settings either :( bash-4.1# cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf | grep "Monitor" Section "Monitor" Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "Monitor Vendor" ModelName "Monitor Model" Monitor "Monitor0" # xrandr -q returns bash-4.1# xrandr -q Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1360 x 768, maximum 4096 x 4096 VGA-1 connected 1360x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 930mm x 523mm 1360x768 60.0*+ 59.8 1024x768 60.0 800x600 60.3 640x480 60.0 I am looking to try a magical command sort of like xrandr 1360x768 ..... after logging in and then startx, after successfull, the command will be added to .bash_login which starts X automagicallly as configured before. Thanks Warren for helping me out. But my experiences with xrandr are limited. I knew how to troubleshoot with HorizSync and VertRefresh and add them to xorg.conf in /etc/X11/xorg.conf, but I don't appear to get any :( Regards, Antonio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 01:50:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AF2106566B for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 01:50:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F2A8FC15 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 01:50:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4T1ons0003275; Sat, 28 May 2011 19:50:49 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p4T1on5w003272; Sat, 28 May 2011 19:50:49 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 19:50:49 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Antonio Olivares In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 28 May 2011 19:50:49 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Out of Range ..., troubleshoot xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 01:50:50 -0000 On Sun, 29 May 2011, Antonio Olivares wrote: > bash-4.1# xrandr -q > Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1360 x 768, maximum 4096 x 4096 > VGA-1 connected 1360x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y > axis) 930mm x 523mm > 1360x768 60.0*+ 59.8 > 1024x768 60.0 > 800x600 60.3 > 640x480 60.0 > > > I am looking to try a magical command sort of like > xrandr 1360x768 ..... xrandr --output VGA-1 --mode 1360x768 But that's what it's already using, indicated by the *. Check the menus of the TV for an overscan setting, or computer/tv or AV/PC mode. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 02:06:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBCB106566C for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 02:06:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3F78FC08 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 02:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so3137791bwz.13 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 19:06:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SIngafvDy6z5YIIdKUTXgBveL/Q0DFF/Yu4Sp/7ETkM=; b=u515/RI5/SvqdNW8l0Ji3HJ9PxwSl9GW3AOvhL2VSvSn3XsHOlD/nt2NIequAVh9eo 1MOF+OixaCd3hq24GDew8+lRAQOQIpR4DFNhM65XHml28E+9RLcrQDCkJOx9wiiMUs16 oqxkU0qeV99A/9QCWnErpcHIdo8LmdtcMtWcg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FKdkaZC7vP6DlRdEL52O/XGwxgIHf5M/Uln1U+8IdH638peJ+fxtheU+WhCNsZu6wp csIWdxAnxHSdGT/zpxWOH7blh+ZgUMix8A2yCQsg7C9kmTJisuo9m0HnI4m2Kl8ESFWF uFtH8wvGAOGLvto3vYscqoJbjgPGIauHFcpjc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.20.147 with SMTP id f19mr3062164bkb.163.1306634783597; Sat, 28 May 2011 19:06:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.176.82 with HTTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 19:06:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 21:06:23 -0500 Message-ID: From: Antonio Olivares To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Out of Range ..., troubleshoot xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 02:06:25 -0000 On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 29 May 2011, Antonio Olivares wrote: > >> bash-4.1# xrandr -q >> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1360 x 768, maximum 4096 x 4096 >> VGA-1 connected 1360x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y >> axis) 930mm x 523mm >> =A01360x768 =A0 =A0 =A0 60.0*+ =A0 59.8 >> =A01024x768 =A0 =A0 =A0 60.0 >> =A0800x600 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A060.3 >> =A0640x480 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A060.0 >> >> >> I am looking to try a magical command sort of like >> xrandr 1360x768 ..... > > xrandr --output VGA-1 --mode 1360x768 > > But that's what it's already using, indicated by the *. =A0Check the menu= s of > the TV for an overscan setting, or computer/tv or AV/PC mode. > Warren, That output above was with a linux live cd :(, I managed to get X working, but the display is HUGE :( [olivares@tricorehome /usr/home/olivares]$ xrandr -q xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default Screen 0: minimum 320 x 240, current 1360 x 768, maximum 1360 x 768 default connected 1360x768+0+0 0mm x 0mm 1360x768 60.0* 1024x768 60.0 800x600 60.0 72.0 640x480 60.0 512x384 60.0 400x300 72.0 60.0 320x240 60.0 [olivares@tricorehome /usr/home/olivares]$ I press CTRL + ALT + (PLUS/MINUS KEYS) on numerical keypad part of keyboard= . [olivares@tricorehome /usr/home/olivares]$ uname -a FreeBSD tricorehome 8.2-RELEASE-p0 FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p0 #0: Sat Apr 2 15:06:58 UTC 2011 root@hybrid.freebsdgr.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [olivares@tricorehome /usr/home/olivares]$ I have tried messing with the TV menu settings, but that is not getting me anywhere. Thank you for your help. I am closer, but not there yet. Regards, Antonio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 02:15:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1DC1065693 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 02:15:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258668FC17 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 02:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so3141202bwz.13 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 19:15:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5IAU0NOsQzvm2XN4lXb15oW1E4Xn632PF+LoiRixBUE=; b=VszztSB9e5gBQwfDRcPXNCiXbwTJ5+UqWHD4a8Un0MAe2VCw9oD5QTGMHU2r13CPDY GaeoUKTv4Y4ZaLBbAyj9XLoTf87udYRfDYJZNpRNlOEGpE65sBeNdOBZ8ldBWsGiKQgM km0C8Hrwhq7/ntwHa8pBCvE+dTl7DsUFR5X+c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=anC/JGJ9yde3AS6NVkJGYuCuSAdXD2tJMk5hJ+TFfSyxG3q9u1ik4fvrkN1gIx08/j p64lvlLOe6tmgBezEe3ADcH18FvtNCj4vBYQj/HUs2cPtWE4QT3omBoITGGK9MO3aqp8 HhtrAKyjtMqP8UOxmDzcSJaHgn4riA1qLSfPQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.7.156 with SMTP id d28mr3141867bkd.28.1306635347953; Sat, 28 May 2011 19:15:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.176.82 with HTTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 19:15:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 21:15:47 -0500 Message-ID: From: Antonio Olivares To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Out of Range ..., troubleshoot xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 02:15:49 -0000 On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote: > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Warren Block wrote: >> On Sun, 29 May 2011, Antonio Olivares wrote: >> >>> bash-4.1# xrandr -q >>> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1360 x 768, maximum 4096 x 4096 >>> VGA-1 connected 1360x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y >>> axis) 930mm x 523mm >>> =A01360x768 =A0 =A0 =A0 60.0*+ =A0 59.8 >>> =A01024x768 =A0 =A0 =A0 60.0 >>> =A0800x600 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A060.3 >>> =A0640x480 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A060.0 >>> >>> >>> I am looking to try a magical command sort of like >>> xrandr 1360x768 ..... >> >> xrandr --output VGA-1 --mode 1360x768 >> >> But that's what it's already using, indicated by the *. =A0Check the men= us of >> the TV for an overscan setting, or computer/tv or AV/PC mode. >> > > Warren, > > That output above was with a linux live cd :(, > I managed to get X working, but the display is HUGE :( > > [olivares@tricorehome /usr/home/olivares]$ xrandr -q > xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default > Screen 0: minimum 320 x 240, current 1360 x 768, maximum 1360 x 768 > default connected 1360x768+0+0 0mm x 0mm > =A0 1360x768 =A0 =A0 =A0 60.0* > =A0 1024x768 =A0 =A0 =A0 60.0 > =A0 800x600 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A060.0 =A0 =A0 72.0 > =A0 640x480 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A060.0 > =A0 512x384 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A060.0 > =A0 400x300 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A072.0 =A0 =A0 60.0 > =A0 320x240 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A060.0 > [olivares@tricorehome /usr/home/olivares]$ > > I press CTRL + ALT + (PLUS/MINUS KEYS) on numerical keypad part of keyboa= rd. > > [olivares@tricorehome /usr/home/olivares]$ uname -a > FreeBSD tricorehome 8.2-RELEASE-p0 FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p0 #0: Sat Apr > 2 15:06:58 UTC 2011 > root@hybrid.freebsdgr.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC =A0amd64 > [olivares@tricorehome /usr/home/olivares]$ > > I have tried messing with the TV menu settings, but that is not > getting me anywhere. > > Thank you for your help. =A0I am closer, but not there yet. > > Regards, > > Antonio > I have output /var/log/Xorg.0.log in http://pastebin.com/UcJmZzyn To see how I can get this working better. Thank you in advance, Antonio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 03:07:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4823A1065686 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 03:07:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-announce@chthonic.com) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.freeshell.org [192.94.73.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5E78FC1C for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 03:07:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:ja@otaku.freeshell.org [192.94.73.16]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p4T2itL1006691 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 02:44:55 GMT Received: (from ja@localhost) by sdf.org (8.14.4/8.12.8/Submit) id p4T2isGG019694 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 May 2011 02:44:54 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: otaku.freeshell.org: ja set sender to freebsd-announce@chthonic.com using -f Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 02:44:54 +0000 From: Joe Altman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110529024454.GA26543@SDF.ORG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Building misc/freebsd-doc-en fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 03:07:05 -0000 Greetings... uname -a FreeBSD whisperer.chthonixia.net 8.1-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p4 #0: Sat May 28 21:25:00 EDT 2011 root@whisperer.chthonixia.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WHISPERER amd64 Sources, including ports, updated on May 28 after the bind security notice. Here is the tail of the error: ================================================ ===> en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products (all) groff -p -S -Wall -mtty-char -man /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-branches.pic > /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-branches.ps groff -p -S -Wall -mtty-char -man /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-organization.pic > /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-organization.ps /bin/rm -f docbook.css /bin/cat /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/share/misc/docbook.css > docbook.css /usr/local/bin/gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dSAFER -dDELAYSAFER -sPAPERSIZE=letter -r72 -sDEVICE=bbox -sOutputFile=/dev/null /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-branches.ps >/usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-branches.eps 2>&1 /usr/local/bin/gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dSAFER -dDELAYSAFER -sPAPERSIZE=letter -r72 -sDEVICE=bbox -sOutputFile=/dev/null /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-organization.ps >/usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-organization.eps 2>&1 *** Error code 1 *** Error code 1 2 errors *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en. ================================================ Any clues on how to fix this? I chose only split HTML as the output. Please feel free to Cc: me as I'm not on the list; but I will check the web interface for the list. Thank you for any help, and best regards, Joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 03:56:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140D5106566B for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 03:56:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E2D8FC13 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 03:56:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4T3uM0M003569; Sat, 28 May 2011 21:56:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p4T3uMqr003566; Sat, 28 May 2011 21:56:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 21:56:22 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Antonio Olivares In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 28 May 2011 21:56:23 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Out of Range ..., troubleshoot xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 03:56:24 -0000 On Sat, 28 May 2011, Antonio Olivares wrote: >> I managed to get X working, but the display is HUGE :( Relatively low resolution on a large display makes for big pixels! >> I have tried messing with the TV menu settings, but that is not >> getting me anywhere. > > I have output /var/log/Xorg.0.log in > > http://pastebin.com/UcJmZzyn Looks like X is choosing 1360x768 and working. It's the TV that's being snooty about showing the signal it receives. You could try forcing it to one of the lower modes in xorg.conf, like 1024x768. Section "Monitor" Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "TSB" ModelName "205" VertRefresh 59-72 EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Card0" Monitor "Monitor0" SubSection "Display" Modes "1024x768" EndSubSection EndSection The log shows that it gets this information from the monitor already, and is already trying to use the right resolution. Hard to say what the TV is doing. If it's touchy about refresh rate, that can be restricted to just a single rate: VertRefresh 60 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 05:56:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B26106566C for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 05:56:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plaine@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC3A8FC13 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 05:56:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so1346265ewy.13 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 22:56:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gzmDFwVg+SOCcH5JrIXJ4Sk/m32bUxb2WVKOM2MZelo=; b=Tgs4DoK+QnfALGnO93TiAun1370lCO8h/8jBk/l718F/fHcGrR4HZ0atx+0EWzU6cQ 9p878GbWVZMsH+J4rldJt1pLARt7W9HAjNet1IH6za1iCNzijxChNvuDvbZSQURDWxiZ 528LWtq+eKIiLXEh1rIpqRTjHEaK14m8x8eUk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=V/T56THY7Yb9feu1F8suBYPk1JB3jrjLiW68JyEBjvA4ltglkDjCCNSDqEplLBm/C4 zKL1ZxpcGSDdg1IXQHnRkPVFxAJpLC0xfTJ+o/CTaMRZIkwqnenPZ6HkjQHg1VXiuR5f gHLncZr0iEnM3uwxTt9s5udFqUQG9ETuFbaYA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.11.136 with SMTP id 8mr1237172eex.70.1306648582629; Sat, 28 May 2011 22:56:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.45.8 with HTTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 22:56:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 08:56:22 +0300 Message-ID: From: pepe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: remote password change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 05:56:25 -0000 On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 8:17 AM, pepe wrote: > > I have two FreeBSD 8 servers running. Server A is for shell access and > > server B for www pages. On B there is only scp/sftp access and no shell > > login. > > Now I'm looking for solution for people to be able to change password for > > server B from inside server A. Or better yet, automatic migration of > > password so if user changes password for server A it would change in > server > > B too. Are there some solutions to do this? > > NIS was mentioned, another option is Kerberos5. The effect would be > the same: centralization of authentication. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kerberos5.html > _______________________________________________ > Ty. I'll look into those later. I didn't mention earlier that I have some users on server A that are not in server B and other way around. Does those (nis and kerberos5) still work so only users on both server will be effected and other users will work unaffected? -- pepe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 06:06:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E8F1065670 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 06:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1C88FC08 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 06:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so2840128fxm.13 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 23:05:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=rlTcnwW3HmXyEwoiqtAB2sUkCu1zOn0dRRg87QKL0/Y=; b=bLn46J36SUgYw1hPzoKYFhEzKm4q0QMNVkOXMZqkkGqL7dgyD3BaIaEKuTS2rK6Xo6 bVkHONkI0K8YCG7TbzYyx35lVAxPTADQevr0GNjoP6F/E958P0w0S+T/9t/PF4iymWct f5KHgDyOMmO06hGv9Hnr+iV6sZDKxt850Om9I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=PVgMnirkWAW6lCbBz27bk1lAKoEjM39p5RpOeaw1jN5Gta7b77aMimej4C30QEgjyA h5jL37YOAQRXfK90RYHrQAoS0vJpI3zV3a9mf7y972PXF3ygQYm+oFwSpDWaiMkhVlTR hBC8A3CQ5BS2Fzo7GXmWmshUGGumvCoLHY5Mk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.17.142 with SMTP id s14mr4088145faa.145.1306649159256; Sat, 28 May 2011 23:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.118.148 with HTTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 23:05:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110529024454.GA26543@SDF.ORG> References: <20110529024454.GA26543@SDF.ORG> Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 01:05:58 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Joe Altman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building misc/freebsd-doc-en fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 06:06:01 -0000 On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Joe Altman wrote: > ===> en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products (all) groff -p -S -Wall > -mtty-char -man > > /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-branches.pic > > > > /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/ > freebsd-branches.ps > groff -p -S -Wall -mtty-char -man > > /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-organization.pic > > > > /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/ > freebsd-organization.ps > /bin/rm -f docbook.css /bin/cat > /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/share/misc/docbook.css > > docbook.css /usr/local/bin/gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dSAFER > -dDELAYSAFER -sPAPERSIZE=letter -r72 -sDEVICE=bbox > -sOutputFile=/dev/null > > /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/ > freebsd-branches.ps > > >/usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-branches.eps > 2>&1 /usr/local/bin/gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dSAFER -dDELAYSAFER > -sPAPERSIZE=letter -r72 -sDEVICE=bbox -sOutputFile=/dev/null > > /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/ > freebsd-organization.ps > > >/usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-organization.eps > 2>&1 > *** Error code 1 > *** Error code 1 > 2 errors > *** Error code 2 > 1 error > *** Error code 2 > 1 error > *** Error code 2 > 1 error > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en. > > ================================================ > > Any clues on how to fix this? I chose only split HTML as the output. > > Please feel free to Cc: me as I'm not on the list; but I will check the web > interface for the list. > Seems like there should be more detail. Try make clean && make -j1 -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 06:07:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA4C106566C for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 06:07:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390598FC16 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 06:07:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so2840346fxm.13 for ; Sat, 28 May 2011 23:07:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=vKFPJ8ce/t7AgB/rOVACsj2kULOTnFv/Jlaph325dts=; b=GtrYSIT2c3jNDAPZJhHd6pCWgTY8FkOb/zsQIljLpFYNYZOH5CRXO3yvV3QuChVOYk Hb/a7gJGoqPF1Ng0k1Q1viduaySgJAHomLyF9KjDiWgK5BMCcv1ixg58dXLbR9dveMNU WzSgEY+/s7LqGpTXLTJGzZGTXtFObkydJcHrc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=xOk0ZpB1+qOpCT5tw5y9vAf7kQ8iRvdHulss6bM+YDw7XU3kjsooFO+TyTYjKq89aZ t2pB3+f5i4uDC+DymfNQM2GvVN1xAma7UJUaSjib0UbqNqWtDYs6z/gL4ZCfKskFu8rK YFr9kMUK2v0NDfBot2unIKpEJRdOoIYBN7Te0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.22.130 with SMTP id n2mr4121161fab.50.1306649228479; Sat, 28 May 2011 23:07:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.118.148 with HTTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 23:07:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20110529024454.GA26543@SDF.ORG> Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 01:07:08 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Joe Altman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building misc/freebsd-doc-en fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 06:07:10 -0000 On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Joe Altman > wrote: > >> ===> en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products (all) groff -p -S -Wall >> -mtty-char -man >> >> /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-branches.pic >> > >> >> /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/ >> freebsd-branches.ps >> groff -p -S -Wall -mtty-char -man >> >> /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-organization.pic >> > >> >> /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/ >> freebsd-organization.ps >> /bin/rm -f docbook.css /bin/cat >> /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/share/misc/docbook.css > >> docbook.css /usr/local/bin/gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dSAFER >> -dDELAYSAFER -sPAPERSIZE=letter -r72 -sDEVICE=bbox >> -sOutputFile=/dev/null >> >> /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/ >> freebsd-branches.ps >> >> >/usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-branches.eps >> 2>&1 /usr/local/bin/gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dSAFER -dDELAYSAFER >> -sPAPERSIZE=letter -r72 -sDEVICE=bbox -sOutputFile=/dev/null >> >> /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/ >> freebsd-organization.ps >> >> >/usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-organization.eps >> 2>&1 >> *** Error code 1 >> *** Error code 1 >> 2 errors >> *** Error code 2 >> 1 error >> *** Error code 2 >> 1 error >> *** Error code 2 >> 1 error >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en. >> >> ================================================ >> >> Any clues on how to fix this? I chose only split HTML as the output. >> >> Please feel free to Cc: me as I'm not on the list; but I will check the >> web interface for the list. >> > > Seems like there should be more detail. Try > > make clean && make -j1 > Err, wait the make clean isn't necessary. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 08:30:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002C5106566C for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 08:30:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45168FC16 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 08:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p4T8UG9u007559 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 29 May 2011 01:30:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p4T8UGYr007558; Sun, 29 May 2011 01:30:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA07913; Sun, 29 May 11 01:24:08 PDT Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 01:26:34 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: plaine@gmail.com Message-Id: <4de2033a.Co0RoXNxZi2/VUcw%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: remote password change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 08:30:17 -0000 pepe wrote: > I didn't mention earlier that I have some users on server A > that are not in server B and other way around. Does those > (nis and kerberos5) still work so only users on both server > will be effected and other users will work unaffected? For NIS, yes, if correctly configured. Each server can have its own set of local users in addition to those authenticated via NIS. Dunno about K5. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 12:00:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F993106564A for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 12:00:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jan0sch@gmx.net) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A08638FC16 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 11:59:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 May 2011 11:59:56 -0000 Received: from dslb-088-072-229-230.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO magni.rostock.home) [88.72.229.230] by mail.gmx.net (mp066) with SMTP; 29 May 2011 13:59:56 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1545395 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19XiRZfS9tX1SAQTyUzazZ8ynYR5moSHBAZaUFkmY 7YQBX+wZDOgx5U Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 13:59:11 +0200 From: Jens Jahnke To: freebsd questions Message-Id: <20110529135911.faca7a4c.jan0sch@gmx.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.0 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) X-Face: &?!P`87-36gaG)/K:yi&ixw=uy]y'?$vrc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA512"; boundary="Signature=_Sun__29_May_2011_13_59_11_+0200_VTNiWkPow/BpUgLn" X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Problems with Realtek ALC885 PCM using snd_hda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 12:00:00 -0000 --Signature=_Sun__29_May_2011_13_59_11_+0200_VTNiWkPow/BpUgLn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, because of some issues with the windows side of my dual boot system I deciced to unplug my old sb live und use the internal soundchip (realtek alc885). Which works great under windows but now I have some issues under bsd. The first one was that snd_hda detected more than one sound device. I was able to solve this using some lines in /etc/rc.local which set the default sound unit. But to my unsolved problems: 1.) The sound playback works fine for some minutes and then I get micro interrupts (skipping half a second or so) every few seconds. I tried to increase the buffersize of the pcm device but that did not help. 2.) I can't get more than one connector running. Right now there are 6 connectors at the rear and two at the front. I've read the manpage of snd_hda regarding device hints but to be honest I didn't understand a single word of it. :-p I tried some hints randomly but failed of course. Currently one connector at the rear (line-out) works but all others are dead. Furthermore the manpage states that rear output should be muted=20 if a headphone is jacked in which also does not work. I'd like to have two connectors running at the rear for my 4.1 speaker system and the headphone on the front panel. Found connectors by snd_hda: hdac0: Patched pins configuration: hdac0: nid 20 0x01014410 as 1 seq 0 Line-out Jack jack 1 loc 1 c= olor Green misc 4 hdac0: nid 21 0x01011412 as 1 seq 2 Line-out Jack jack 1 loc 1 c= olor Black misc 4 hdac0: nid 22 0x01016411 as 1 seq 1 Line-out Jack jack 1 loc 1 c= olor Orange misc 4 hdac0: nid 23 0x01012414 as 1 seq 4 Line-out Jack jack 1 loc 1 c= olor Grey misc 4 hdac0: nid 24 0x01a19c40 as 4 seq 0 Mic Jack jack 1 loc 1 c= olor Pink misc 12 hdac0: nid 25 0x02a19c50 as 5 seq 0 Mic Jack jack 1 loc 2 c= olor Pink misc 12 hdac0: nid 26 0x0181344f as 4 seq 15 Line-in Jack jack 1 loc 1 c= olor Blue misc 4 hdac0: nid 27 0x02214c20 as 2 seq 0 Headphones Jack jack 1 loc 2 c= olor Green misc 12 hdac0: nid 28 0x593301f0 as 15 seq 0 CD None jack 3 loc 25 c= olor Unknown misc 1 [DISABLED] hdac0: nid 30 0x014b6130 as 3 seq 0 SPDIF-out Jack jack 11 loc 1 c= olor Orange misc 1 hdac0: nid 31 0x01cb7160 as 6 seq 0 SPDIF-in Jack jack 11 loc 1 c= olor Yellow misc 1 BTW: I tried audio/oss which solved the first but not the second problem. Regards, Jens --=20 29. Wonnemond 2011, 13:43 Homepage : http://www.jan0sch.de Thirty days hath Septober, April, June, and no wonder. all the rest have peanut butter except my father who wears red suspenders. --Signature=_Sun__29_May_2011_13_59_11_+0200_VTNiWkPow/BpUgLn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iQG8BAEBCgAGBQJN4jUyAAoJED2+SXzzbciGZAsNAJj8reQNs/1oGFcIlLYbTeg4 /+XQuUdTNEhUT04p4FOZT43uFiOcxOfbxihkdTV0euhLgxcVM98Qkp3WsBroUTqU ydhMHlzMbsxh7mr8Q3Oqt+jByXl74qodTQsvRTqFTl/IjBD+lFn93qCjWj2/xH8+ lxFpG8lCvhhQ2fv+CsFPf96oI7sy1rde36fdieUnUP8jYMTxdqnCsLdIS/bT+EoP YTidEKhLA1zec7cgBNs9JlZWxwx+o4WXo2/BQlOLO7b3fdPb10pDyB63LOD9IT4P QjxLeoLYHSegyyZLsZy/phE029APL/5SlC8rLo+tYj2xpe/nsJyoiSE0ltrD0f9i VL7yl3sF6vPMsTw+s41xmKuBp/zKsFj1UMh1FRwO+t5EkeLO8+2UqrA68Aams3tY l8RM91NAZ2agkEh1zvRnRkisGKUZtLMOTXdC/kcFzmkUMzU4rWVYmDEU1pBqQWmV oobn5Ww7meGKMFFHULpDBRkVZ2oFRnoO4wc6R7fKETXhHEXhNPMUAsoHUmhBaM8A 6fYc5ZRT5Ij59J9dIFsa =v7Bp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sun__29_May_2011_13_59_11_+0200_VTNiWkPow/BpUgLn-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 11:53:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A890F1065670 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 11:53:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pwnedomina@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFE08FC12 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 11:53:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so2868833wyf.13 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 04:53:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=B6yGxqCA+xXIeXy1ktm3ZTbLw/UNV//IOcVwUO3Pvck=; b=HvSw4tmyLtQQzI8w/GC7530UzV4AumFHdxiuQIpe8St93mGTC0y9kY8iShqTEG2gn8 PvsqBV7oX+/lYnbm6u12N+wTNOsWx9y0gJBIRpzzT4wSuMGl+C+DuXP90SFG7RPp7pYu khu/Mh0gFz46thECYUR2xXaPI3IgtIFQN/z0s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=nYBJauyBJA3URVx9VM61sh1r3/49MLM97w6r/itd4HQomeJnPVCZg1GB79gCM3huYR FhLTeixGTBtZ8xmXwULCGdhOI43DOWO8Ulzqf/Qy76mI+Hc5pZTnWYbHloW1owNBZO0n LKIE2R6+LyErFWv6fqT3iNwN8e1fxSac0XH/8= Received: by 10.227.152.132 with SMTP id g4mr3761208wbw.24.1306669995912; Sun, 29 May 2011 04:53:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.71] (bl16-97-246.dsl.telepac.pt [188.81.97.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ej7sm2372670wbb.53.2011.05.29.04.53.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 29 May 2011 04:53:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DE233A5.5010706@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 12:53:09 +0100 From: pwnedomina User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 29 May 2011 12:31:10 +0000 Cc: Subject: fluxbox and rox-filer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 11:53:17 -0000 anyone here uses fluxbox with rox-filer? im having some troubles installing new themes.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 14:32:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560DF106566C for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 14:32:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-announce@chthonic.com) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.freeshell.org [192.94.73.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C808FC0C for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 14:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:ja@otaku.freeshell.org [192.94.73.16]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p4TEWc69020384 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 14:32:38 GMT Received: (from ja@localhost) by sdf.org (8.14.4/8.12.8/Submit) id p4TEWb5J010833 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 May 2011 14:32:37 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: otaku.freeshell.org: ja set sender to freebsd-announce@chthonic.com using -f Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 14:32:37 +0000 From: Joe Altman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110529143237.GA16057@SDF.ORG> References: <20110529024454.GA26543@SDF.ORG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: Building misc/freebsd-doc-en fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 14:32:39 -0000 > On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Adam Vande More wrote: > > > > Seems like there should be more detail. Try > > > > make clean && make -j1 Interesting: ===> Building for en-freebsd-doc-20110521 /bin/cat /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/pkg-plist.html-split /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/pkg-plist.html-common /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/pkg-plist.extras /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/pkg-plist.common > /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/pkg-plist ===> en_US.ISO8859-1 (all) ===> en_US.ISO8859-1/articles (all) ===> en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/5-roadmap (all) ===> en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/bsdl-gpl (all) ===> en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products (all) /usr/bin/perl /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/share/misc/epsgeom -offset 100 100 /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-organization.eps | /usr/local/bin/gs -q -dBATCH -dGraphicsAlphaBits=4 -dTextAlphaBits=4 -dEPSCrop -r100x100 -dNOPAUSE -dSAFER -sDEVICE=pnm -sOutputFile=- -g`/usr/bin/perl /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/share/misc/epsgeom -geom 100 100 /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-organization.eps` - | /usr/local/bin/pnmtopng > /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-organization.png /usr/bin/perl /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/share/misc/epsgeom -offset 100 100 /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-branches.eps | /usr/local/bin/gs -q -dBATCH -dGraphicsAlphaBits=4 -dTextAlphaBits=4 -dEPSCrop -r100x100 -dNOPAUSE -dSAFER -sDEVICE=pnm -sOutputFile=- -g`/usr/bin/perl /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/share/misc/epsgeom -geom 100 100 /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-branches.eps` - | /usr/local/bin/pnmtopng > /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/work/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/building-products/../../../share/images/articles/building-products/freebsd-branches.png Error: no BoundingBox found. Error: no BoundingBox found. Error: no BoundingBox found. pnmtopng: bad magic number - not a ppm, pgm, or pbm file *** Error code 1 Error: no BoundingBox found. pnmtopng: bad magic number - not a ppm, pgm, or pbm file *** Error code 1 2 errors *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 1 1 error *** Error code 2 There is this thread from 2009, and it looks like the same issue as the one in this message: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-December/209892.html It looks like I'll need to open a bug report with the Doc project team. Thanks for the pointer, Adam. Best regards, Joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 14:46:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E2F106564A for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 14:46:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E148FC0A for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 14:46:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so3442611bwz.13 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 07:46:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QLlYwSTqt6cRw7315Yeb4Lo0wS63mww5jHGLtx72meA=; b=tt9c4CegR8/Qi0MFSxzabdTmYbe1q+EwDNVsyNeOZcOG2edOmvAivC28yO5oHwjtJm vs6W1k4lzQ1YikgtAchUUt/P76qeGT3mWJZ2OuOW7agOSEAqvdrlbYDzPLYcAmI8bRn5 UH7j2d4y7NL1c253Jw12gt11zSqr22sRnYmJ0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=usQx4Ee2cBqe3+TTu8zMvDROlKU7nfni289PpzdX+4VBWh9C4jR031yuTeAS/mVUM4 xtSadjTiL8JZVfDlF8CoSGxOR/FMxsugX1tvO9ETvTYmVljWF0HDtnpKCpkLtDD+1GDV 9EZNl0HMzNWw9q/sdQJLpj7fh1DExRhtuqtB4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.3.146 with SMTP id 18mr3523670bkn.1.1306680415962; Sun, 29 May 2011 07:46:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.176.82 with HTTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 07:46:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 09:46:55 -0500 Message-ID: From: Antonio Olivares To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Out of Range ..., troubleshoot xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 14:46:59 -0000 On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Sat, 28 May 2011, Antonio Olivares wrote: > >>> I managed to get X working, but the display is HUGE :( > > Relatively low resolution on a large display makes for big pixels! > >>> I have tried messing with the TV menu settings, but that is not >>> getting me anywhere. >> >> I have output /var/log/Xorg.0.log in >> >> http://pastebin.com/UcJmZzyn > > Looks like X is choosing 1360x768 and working. =A0It's the TV that's bein= g > snooty about showing the signal it receives. =A0You could try forcing it = to > one of the lower modes in xorg.conf, like 1024x768. > > Section "Monitor" > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Identifier =A0 "Monitor0" > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0VendorName =A0 "TSB" > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ModelName =A0 =A0"205" > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0VertRefresh =A059-72 > EndSection > > Section "Screen" > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Identifier "Screen0" > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Device =A0 =A0 "Card0" > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Monitor =A0 =A0"Monitor0" > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0SubSection "Display" > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Modes "1024x768" > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0EndSubSection > EndSection > > The log shows that it gets this information from the monitor already, and= is > already trying to use the right resolution. =A0Hard to say what the TV is > doing. =A0If it's touchy about refresh rate, that can be restricted to ju= st a > single rate: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0VertRefresh =A060 > Warren, I appreciate the help, but I could not get it to work. I put in Modes "1024x768" "800x600", etc and changed the VertRefresh several times and it was a no GO :(, still Monitor out of Range or "No Video Signal". I have swapped the two monitors and now I can at least see the desktop :) using an ACER AL2216W with 1680x1050 display : [olivares@tricorehome /usr/home/olivares]$ xrandr -q xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default Screen 0: minimum 320 x 240, current 1680 x 1050, maximum 1680 x 1050 default connected 1680x1050+0+0 0mm x 0mm 1680x1050 60.0* 1400x1050 60.0 75.0 1280x1024 75.0 60.0 1440x900 75.0 60.0 1280x960 60.0 1366x768 60.0 1152x864 75.0 1024x768 75.0 70.0 60.0 896x672 60.0 832x624 75.0 800x600 75.0 72.0 60.0 56.0 65.0 700x525 75.0 60.0 640x512 75.0 60.0 640x480 75.0 73.0 67.0 60.0 720x400 70.0 576x432 75.0 512x384 75.0 70.0 60.0 416x312 75.0 400x300 75.0 72.0 60.0 56.0 320x240 75.0 73.0 60.0 Thank you for hanging in there with me. I appreciate it. Regards, Antonio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 15:02:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2CD1065785 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 15:02:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492038FC14 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 15:02:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyg13 with SMTP id 13so1633656gyg.13 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 08:02:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KTkgIb4pdcMSrPMlp+dt9vYDpg2ppmUI93ybrGQiE4o=; b=V2lfmaRxaW+A2nizZIF7jJMtsVAjQvLNi82fbBhGoVt4wuLMVVVQzP7q44TK7hyKyj 3c+LQjdslCy8uZ56wekfUyqhvrrvJHHp/K2GBfWFZ228Tp6M+do0KDWScamkItF46Fx1 Bqn+XTmNWZym6J+6gtD+MVazRfJTmB72melNQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lXlL7vyAyuFSrMeo67vlZc4oWaGJs1kgNQAEE4m6lmaECNwzQzOcPPpE7AL2nwUivj BXWhakt5MoZY+AgaPZNmyDQsNIWlXeMzQdrv9HCx6GH8J9axJn7GO5hUCJmajTeJhDUj IGp9YpPR+NM5GmDmsJBEUNgVv3UpRvhjkXQwU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.28.33 with SMTP id f33mr2615713anj.36.1306681347356; Sun, 29 May 2011 08:02:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.131.9 with HTTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 08:02:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4de2033a.Co0RoXNxZi2/VUcw%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4de2033a.Co0RoXNxZi2/VUcw%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 11:02:27 -0400 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: remote password change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 15:02:28 -0000 On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 4:26 AM, wrote: > For NIS, yes, if correctly configured. =A0Each server can have its > own set of local users in addition to those authenticated via NIS. > Dunno about K5. Yes, by using .k5users and .k5login you can administrate which k5 principles can access which accounts on the box in question. Further reading: http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/ http://www.faqs.org/faqs/kerberos-faq/general/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 15:16:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85366106566C for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 15:16:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C358FC0C for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 15:16:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4TFGJh9005608; Sun, 29 May 2011 09:16:19 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p4TFGJaQ005605; Sun, 29 May 2011 09:16:19 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 09:16:19 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Antonio Olivares In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 29 May 2011 09:16:19 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Out of Range ..., troubleshoot xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 15:16:20 -0000 On Sun, 29 May 2011, Antonio Olivares wrote: > I appreciate the help, but I could not get it to work. I put in Modes > "1024x768" "800x600", etc and changed the VertRefresh several times > and it was a no GO :(, still Monitor out of Range or "No Video > Signal". It's probably worth trying 1366x768, which is a standard mode and probably the native resolution. It might work. Could you identify the make and model of the TV? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 15:33:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F117B106564A for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 15:33:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7907F8FC12 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 15:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so3465874bwz.13 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 08:33:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uMJZp3hQ2YWbkplmSxjOQRRpLXgnQT+kJRpElZLAO2s=; b=GgwWZkyDc27Q0QnGQTYOn0oQjohK5oUOFTWvYtgaYKaDBKfLU74roHbIQJynEAurkp tjEl5znDHt9P+S/577cmKCd/NMcURKBfLJEgYWasEDC/vtmri07jdSDRpn07kMDFqdAz 4LtplOI2JnGWWinpYKX0iKLssDQhVkyJ2P1Iw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=syDB5MvHLCCRYucwWtjQmmbx/AM1Lku2QiZzurcRQTuaGkEZKzrKM77LuJ5lmQC3K3 e1kR54KMyyGtzuNYWC+JIpUiXO4jao9V6p3+q5exlAxz/TiNrRV56MiA+6TkM1A2wpfZ XiPhj9RDw5bT9dZWBwC9y29jSzKLJ/OngYatI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.24.4 with SMTP id t4mr1189118bkb.109.1306683188245; Sun, 29 May 2011 08:33:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.176.82 with HTTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 08:33:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 10:33:08 -0500 Message-ID: From: Antonio Olivares To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Out of Range ..., troubleshoot xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 15:33:10 -0000 On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 29 May 2011, Antonio Olivares wrote: > >> I appreciate the help, but I could not get it to work. =A0I put in Modes >> "1024x768" "800x600", etc and changed the VertRefresh several times >> and it was a no GO :(, still Monitor out of Range or "No Video >> Signal". > > It's probably worth trying 1366x768, which is a standard mode and probabl= y > the native resolution. =A0It might work. =A0Could you identify the make a= nd > model of the TV? > Make: TOSHIBA Model#: 26AV502U 120V ~60HZ I had found an xorg.conf file previously generated before and I copied the Monitor Section parts Section "Monitor" Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "TSB" ModelName "TOSHIBA-TV" HorizSync 31.0 - 49.0 VertRefresh 59.0 - 72.0 Option "DPMS" EndSection and it did not work :( I even thought about cd'd to /usr/ports/x11-drivers and compiling nouveau or nvidia to see if it would work?, but I guess just swap the monitors with another machine that I have at home and be happy :? :) or :( root@slax:~# cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "X.org Configured" Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" EndSection Section "Files" RgbPath "/usr/share/X11/rgb" ModulePath "/usr/lib/xorg/modules" FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/TTF" FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/OTF" FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/Type1" FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/misc" FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" EndSection Section "Module" Load "GLcore" Load "dbe" Load "dri" Load "extmod" Load "glx" Load "record" Load "xtrap" Load "freetype" Load "type1" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Keyboard0" Driver "kbd" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" EndSection Section "Monitor" Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "TSB" ModelName "TOSHIBA-TV" HorizSync 31.0 - 49.0 VertRefresh 59.0 - 72.0 Option "DPMS" EndSection Section "Device" Identifier "Card0" Driver "radeon" VendorName "ATI Technologies Inc" BoardName "Radeon X1200 Series" BusID "PCI:1:5:0" EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Card0" Monitor "Monitor0" SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 1 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 4 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 8 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 15 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 16 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 24 EndSubSection EndSection Thanks for your help and suggestions. Regards, Antonio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 16:05:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECC5106564A for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 16:05:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6C68FC13 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 16:05:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4TG5dpC005772; Sun, 29 May 2011 10:05:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p4TG5duE005769; Sun, 29 May 2011 10:05:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 10:05:39 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Antonio Olivares In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 29 May 2011 10:05:39 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Out of Range ..., troubleshoot xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 16:05:40 -0000 On Sun, 29 May 2011, Antonio Olivares wrote: > On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Warren Block wrote: >> On Sun, 29 May 2011, Antonio Olivares wrote: > > I even thought about cd'd to /usr/ports/x11-drivers and compiling > nouveau or nvidia to see if it would work?, but I guess just swap the > monitors with another machine that I have at home and be happy :? :) > or :( The nVidia binary drivers and associated settings programs might do it. I don't have nVidia stuff and can't really help there, but did find this Linux thread about that monitor and problems with what sounds like DPI and "no video" errors: http://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=42279&p=244507 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 20:08:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53570106564A for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 20:08:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward9.mail.yandex.net (forward9.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28708FC15 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 20:08:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp7.mail.yandex.net (smtp7.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.55]) by forward9.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 27198CE1A3B; Mon, 30 May 2011 00:08:04 +0400 (MSD) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1306699684; bh=hOj1Sa0MvfDGaiR9rLntxGC7MaqTkTLUOQ2M1xzWM7g=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=M1F0DgVjuCyUQHwnVLDeDLALt8XSldIIUcIFknm0M/ZiBmywtObzBXOQvMmtk99l8 NoqtgZZMpAgc/H+1S2GF3lpDqzmkth/Mkr5ZY09XIUztwXJqA3UP/o8F7opvB0eYSM oFsclbcTBB5JIyZ/9TTIv1lLYpNEEOUGvEIZl9oM= Received: from HOMEUSER (unknown [77.93.52.4]) by smtp7.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTPA id 99FF548C8052; Mon, 30 May 2011 00:08:03 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 23:08:03 +0300 From: =?koi8-r?B?68/O2MvP1yDl18fFzsnK?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: =?koi8-r?B?/vAg68/O2MvP1ywgRnJlZUxpbmU=?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <854814211.20110529230803@yandex.ru> To: Adam Vande More In-Reply-To: References: <1857504788.20110518220129@yandex.ru> <469A67A7-8F08-4A02-8AB2-03019FDE5065@mac.com> <218834106.20110518220711@yandex.ru> <15710232314.20110518222125@yandex.ru> <3D67F8F7-8892-494C-985C-581DDF6CA4AD@mac.com> <120581865.20110518231534@yandex.ru> <936691689.20110528214641@yandex.ru> <4DE14694.1020309@gmx.de> <1678374264.20110528235537@yandex.ru> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Yandex-Spam: 1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 29 May 2011 20:17:00 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Lokadamus , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[4]: How to install doc for 9-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?koi8-r?B?68/O2MvP1yDl18fFzsnK?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 20:08:06 -0000 Zdravstvujte, Adam. Vy pisali 29 maya 2011 g., 1:53:41: > 2011/5/28 Adam Vande More <[1]amvandemore@gmail.com> 2011/5/28 Kon'kov Evgenij <[2]kes-kes@yandex.ru> I take snapshot from that. It is not include doc. while installing it says: 'Can not find doc packages....' [3]ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9-current/doc s/ You probably want to run the latest RELEASE or STABLE, not CURRENT. CURRENT is for individuals who are familiar with FreeBSD and able to solve such problems on their own. The other branches are tested much more. sorry, but that is not what I am looking for. How to install 'man' pages? they are not included in .iso and there are not on link you advice. -- S uvazheniem, Kon'kov [4]mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru References 1. mailto:amvandemore@gmail.com 2. mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru 3. ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9-current/docs/ 4. mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 22:29:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553EC1065670 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 22:29:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-announce@chthonic.com) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.freeshell.org [192.94.73.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8A68FC08 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 22:29:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:ja@otaku.freeshell.org [192.94.73.16]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p4TMTAxS022501 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 22:29:10 GMT Received: (from ja@localhost) by sdf.org (8.14.4/8.12.8/Submit) id p4TMT9RM026188 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 May 2011 22:29:09 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: otaku.freeshell.org: ja set sender to freebsd-announce@chthonic.com using -f Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 22:29:09 +0000 From: Joe Altman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110529222909.GA11577@SDF.ORG> References: <20110529024454.GA26543@SDF.ORG> <20110529143237.GA16057@SDF.ORG> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110529143237.GA16057@SDF.ORG> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: Building misc/freebsd-doc-en fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 22:29:11 -0000 On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 02:32:37PM +0000, Joe Altman wrote: > > There is this thread from 2009, and it looks like the same issue as > the one in this message: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-December/209892.html > > It looks like I'll need to open a bug report with the Doc project > team. After reading the thread referenced above, and looking at the output of my build, I noticed that the build was failing in different areas. So I decided to run make on the port multiple times, and eventually the port installed successfully. However, the port in my tree (dated # $FreeBSD: ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/Makefile,v 1.36 2011/05/22 14:28:49 blackend Exp $) in a fresh tree made only through 2010, according to the copyright at the top of the handbook. Individual files in that doc tree were variously dated; the newest being 8/2010. So I ran make, multiple times, on the source; and that gave me a doc tree dated 2011. Most of the files there were dated 5/29/11. A few exceptions were found in image files dated 3/2010, which all loaded in SeaMonkey, except for some files in: advanced-networking, security, vinum, geom. I may have missed others in other books. To summarize: 1) It appears that make is, in this case, a hammer that must be applied more than once to either the source or the port. 2) Not all images are seen as valid, and according to make may have bad magic numbers. If building from source is used on a fresh tree, it may be possible to have make ignore all the errors by using the -k flag. 3) I have no idea how things will go with an upgrade to the doc source; I normally use portupgrade, so I suppose I will find out later. I've submitted a bug report. Best regards, Joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 00:04:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3B2106566C for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 00:04:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pwnedomina@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D208FC0C for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 00:04:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so3279221wwc.31 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 17:04:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LzGh7VbAByKwtII64YLBhu7cvTK1EDlry7hY6u+q4qM=; b=B4p4hCgHeOCSQCch1NRZNu64aqUKl37EVW/Jt3cOkzIg3kymU2dDveTnKjbZPsZ2Wc Ga3LEcEumpd4eMpgrLI1AclEDvqdkJWoUCBiW/q83a97sKi/dnS+IyJKG+vH2F+z1uWY qFbbL/GiwvCuMp9RWqoqE/OjfHBW8mZtZ3P2Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SUCBoWNYpjZF0TKHB2dPhAJY1cT9I9bOIBnJCXUDunXZt+HUV4LzTkzTz4XksoNpoN Y99ylzyAP6CydHUl0S3zD6jzi6KsZbZZ6ri+uVaLtQbgO/4C+Qv8cVYhEiXjKITf2d3y cgTIozjS48hWTmqstp67ipRIj6G41cDMmwdXY= Received: by 10.227.199.80 with SMTP id er16mr4184829wbb.78.1306713849773; Sun, 29 May 2011 17:04:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.71] (bl16-97-246.dsl.telepac.pt [188.81.97.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id en1sm2682339wbb.18.2011.05.29.17.04.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 29 May 2011 17:04:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DE2DEF8.2070301@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 01:04:08 +0100 From: pwnedomina User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 30 May 2011 00:50:24 +0000 Cc: Subject: root-portal compilation problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 00:04:11 -0000 while trying to compile root-portal i get this error process.h:59: error: extra qualification 'Procchange::' on member 'updated' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/user/root-portal-0.5.2/src/modules/process. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/user/root-portal-0.5.2/src/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/user/root-portal-0.5.2/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/user/root-portal-0.5.2. can someone reproduce the same problem? i need to get this working.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 01:54:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BFFD1065672 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 01:54:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1FD8FC14 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 01:54:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so3188719fxm.13 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 18:54:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=xzykxXEhmugdoE+OyQ6CK19VhAD3aETUkwFKRXngs3Q=; b=Cv7QwQl4JYBhebvgwWh6B1wrX2RJ3VhHqU5y7s67oh3sviXlCiVNThqbuWOWyCyEX6 uwzqfwKWu9OTRarI2z9tKLY0Uf/4cKzadlme6hVGDpklW5mN9+vFnyIHwzMcWWDY8jPC nV6+TwMkpOzwA1fF6a9CZdbb4hoeYaAgzEEek= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=bA7w9bQqLW9E8b6ldAvU4tnnxIeRcCo+zdPNaUxv1/sJam7JiLUzrL4+Px4fhjijNC MWF6/Xw7x9UuLH6zxbumQNAMxRBVqSa+uBIvZ4lX0cziBiK6jLyfqiYr6LpeVjK2pb6R fTD4yw51/ofUCrxRRvVpmUFEw9JtwAygSIfmU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.17.142 with SMTP id s14mr4895337faa.145.1306720458485; Sun, 29 May 2011 18:54:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.118.148 with HTTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 18:54:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <854814211.20110529230803@yandex.ru> References: <1857504788.20110518220129@yandex.ru> <469A67A7-8F08-4A02-8AB2-03019FDE5065@mac.com> <218834106.20110518220711@yandex.ru> <15710232314.20110518222125@yandex.ru> <3D67F8F7-8892-494C-985C-581DDF6CA4AD@mac.com> <120581865.20110518231534@yandex.ru> <936691689.20110528214641@yandex.ru> <4DE14694.1020309@gmx.de> <1678374264.20110528235537@yandex.ru> <854814211.20110529230803@yandex.ru> Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 20:54:18 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: =?KOI8-R?B?68/O2MvP1yDl18fFzsnK?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Lokadamus , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re[4]: How to install doc for 9-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 01:54:20 -0000 2011/5/29 =EB=CF=CE=D8=CB=CF=D7 =E5=D7=C7=C5=CE=C9=CA > sorry, but that is not what I am looking for. > > How to install 'man' pages? they are not included in .iso and there are n= ot > on link you advice. > I don't know how to install the man pages from the snapshot cd, but if you have the source for your version you can do: cd /usr/src/share/man make install --=20 Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 02:50:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FCE3106564A for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 02:50:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-yi0-f54.google.com (mail-yi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343C58FC14 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 02:50:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yie12 with SMTP id 12so1822990yie.13 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 19:50:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.181.163 with SMTP id l23mr3350166yhm.206.1306723824547; Sun, 29 May 2011 19:50:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from papi.localnet ([187.112.18.31]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d50sm2114343yhh.24.2011.05.29.19.50.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 29 May 2011 19:50:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Mario Lobo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 23:49:50 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-STABLE; KDE/4.6.2; amd64; ; ) X-KMail-Markup: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201105292349.50921.lobo@bsd.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Funny thing with portsclean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 02:50:26 -0000 # Papi/root [23:28:52] [~]>portsclean -D Detecting unreferenced distfiles... <-- !! Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/akonadi-1.5.2.tar.bz2 Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdeaccessibility-4.6.2.tar.bz2 Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdeadmin-4.6.2.tar.bz2 Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdeartwork-4.6.2.tar.bz2 Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdebase-4.6.2.tar.bz2 Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdebase-runtime-4.6.2.tar.bz2 Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdebase-workspace-4.6.2.tar.bz2 Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdebindings-4.6.2.tar.bz2 Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdeedu-4.6.2.tar.bz2 Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdegames-4.6.2.tar.bz2 Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdegraphics-4.6.2.tar.bz2 Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdelibs-4.6.2.tar.bz2 Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdemultimedia-4.6.2.tar.bz2 Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdenetwork-4.6.2.tar.bz2 Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdepimlibs-4.6.2.tar.bz2 Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdeplasma-addons-4.6.2.tar.bz2 Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdesdk-4.6.2.tar.bz2 Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdetoys-4.6.2.tar.bz2 Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdeutils-4.6.2.tar.bz2 Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdewebdev-4.6.2.tar.bz2 Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/oxygen-icons-4.6.2.tar.bz2 How can these files be unreferenced if I've those installed?? # Papi/root [23:36:17] [~]>pkg_info | grep kde akonadi-1.5.2 Storage server for kdepim kde4-4.6.2 The "meta-port" for KDE kde4-freebsd-carddeck-1.0 FreeBSD themed deck for KDE card games kde4-icons-oxygen-4.6.2 The Oxygen icon theme for KDE kde4-shared-mime-info-1.1 Handles shared MIME database under ${KDE4_PREFIX} kde4-xdg-env-1.0 Script which hooks into startkde and helps KDE pick up XDG kdeaccessibility-4.6.2 Accessibility applications for KDE4 kdeadmin-4.6.2 KDE Admin applications kdeartwork-4.6.2 KDE Artworks Themes kdebase-4.6.2 Basic applications for the KDE system kdebase-runtime-4.6.2_1 Basic applications for the KDE system kdebase-workspace-4.6.2 Basic applications for the KDE system kdebindings-python-4.6.2 Meta port of Python bindings for KDE kdebindings-smoke-4.6.2 SMOKE bindings for Qt/KDE kdeedu-4.6.2 Collection of entertaining, educational programs for KDE kdegames-4.6.2 Games for the KDE integrated X11 desktop kdegraphics-4.6.2_2 Graphics utilities for the KDE4 integrated X11 desktop kdehier-1.0_11 Utility port which installs a hierarchy of shared KDE kdehier4-1.0.7 Utility port that creates hierarchy of shared KDE4 kdelibs-3.5.10_7 Base set of libraries needed by KDE programs kdelibs-4.6.2 Base set of libraries needed by KDE programs kdemultimedia-4.6.2 KDE Multimedia applications kdenetwork-4.6.2_1 KDE Network applications kdepim-4.4.11.1 Libraries for KDE-PIM applications kdepim-runtime-4.4.11.1 Libraries for KDE-PIM applications kdepimlibs-4.6.2 Libraries for KDE-PIM applications kdeplasma-addons-4.6.2 Extra plasmoids for KDE4 kdesdk-4.6.2 KDE Software Development Kit kdetoys-4.6.2 Collection of entertaining programs for KDE kdeutils-4.6.2 Utilities for the KDE4 integrated X11 Desktop Is portsclean doing something wrong here or am I missing something? isn't it supposed to cross info with the installed packeges database before deleting the distfiles, even if you "csuped" the ports tree? -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 04:18:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5AB1065676 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 04:18:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0FD68FC14 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 04:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxl31 with SMTP id 31so1840749yxl.13 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 21:18:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WvvyaLTp/JGgdYvn1rozOkBpE65B30u4lpRYMRcAwrU=; b=vHdaoz7ljqkUWmXzs64f/zmdk0aDcbl9mcEW/i+mX9H9YuvgFw/GXtqIV09XDmngro 9TwOlTJz5KgP3OdvLv5s4V0RvUgIgVEv+TKsHAx5D9F5ZjLsnYtybZ7XR2k5s95mlNaO J5gWc14nTLnOjTXCkLjCf9IuxFhs3nqgXR9bI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tll1jJHjdwBJCHlH94qw4ARo6sFhhzcAnNZg3hh/BxdDtL1UdBMPdzUcRvtA9eROS3 JpqtY4jC19KrmiVdDcq8h6nLS171MQ9wBZw006kvvwrlMdWTp2lYIp2Zkh6O+j1dABQe cOuWOQa0Dv/JuKSfnps6I13B1jQkmFhRTC4Zk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.180.22 with SMTP id h22mr2887836anp.80.1306729079892; Sun, 29 May 2011 21:17:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.131.9 with HTTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 21:17:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201105292349.50921.lobo@bsd.com.br> References: <201105292349.50921.lobo@bsd.com.br> Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 00:17:59 -0400 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Funny thing with portsclean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 04:18:01 -0000 On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: > # Papi/root [23:28:52] > [~]>portsclean -D > > Detecting unreferenced distfiles... <-- !! > > Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/akonadi-1.5.2.tar.bz2 > Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdeaccessibility-4.6.2.tar.bz2 > Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdeadmin-4.6.2.tar.bz2 > Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdeartwork-4.6.2.tar.bz2 > Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdebase-4.6.2.tar.bz2 > Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdebase-runtime-4.6.2.tar.bz2 > Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdebase-workspace-4.6.2.tar.bz2 > Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdebindings-4.6.2.tar.bz2 > Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdeedu-4.6.2.tar.bz2 > Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdegames-4.6.2.tar.bz2 > Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdegraphics-4.6.2.tar.bz2 > Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdelibs-4.6.2.tar.bz2 > Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdemultimedia-4.6.2.tar.bz2 > Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdenetwork-4.6.2.tar.bz2 > Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdepimlibs-4.6.2.tar.bz2 > Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdeplasma-addons-4.6.2.tar.bz2 > Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdesdk-4.6.2.tar.bz2 > Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdetoys-4.6.2.tar.bz2 > Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdeutils-4.6.2.tar.bz2 > Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/kdewebdev-4.6.2.tar.bz2 > Delete /usr/ports/distfiles/KDE/oxygen-icons-4.6.2.tar.bz2 > > How can these files be unreferenced if I've those installed?? > > # Papi/root [23:36:17] > [~]>pkg_info | grep kde > akonadi-1.5.2 =A0 =A0 =A0 Storage server for kdepim > kde4-4.6.2 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0The "meta-port" for KDE > kde4-freebsd-carddeck-1.0 FreeBSD themed deck for KDE card games > kde4-icons-oxygen-4.6.2 The Oxygen icon theme for KDE > kde4-shared-mime-info-1.1 Handles shared MIME database under ${KDE4_PREFI= X} > kde4-xdg-env-1.0 =A0 =A0Script which hooks into startkde and helps KDE pi= ck up XDG > kdeaccessibility-4.6.2 Accessibility applications for KDE4 > kdeadmin-4.6.2 =A0 =A0 =A0KDE Admin applications > kdeartwork-4.6.2 =A0 =A0KDE Artworks Themes > kdebase-4.6.2 =A0 =A0 =A0 Basic applications for the KDE system > kdebase-runtime-4.6.2_1 Basic applications for the KDE system > kdebase-workspace-4.6.2 Basic applications for the KDE system > kdebindings-python-4.6.2 Meta port of Python bindings for KDE > kdebindings-smoke-4.6.2 SMOKE bindings for Qt/KDE > kdeedu-4.6.2 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Collection of entertaining, educational progr= ams for KDE > kdegames-4.6.2 =A0 =A0 =A0Games for the KDE integrated X11 desktop > kdegraphics-4.6.2_2 Graphics utilities for the KDE4 integrated X11 deskto= p > kdehier-1.0_11 =A0 =A0 =A0Utility port which installs a hierarchy of shar= ed KDE > kdehier4-1.0.7 =A0 =A0 =A0Utility port that creates hierarchy of shared K= DE4 > kdelibs-3.5.10_7 =A0 =A0Base set of libraries needed by KDE programs > kdelibs-4.6.2 =A0 =A0 =A0 Base set of libraries needed by KDE programs > kdemultimedia-4.6.2 KDE Multimedia applications > kdenetwork-4.6.2_1 =A0KDE Network applications > kdepim-4.4.11.1 =A0 =A0 Libraries for KDE-PIM applications > kdepim-runtime-4.4.11.1 Libraries for KDE-PIM applications > kdepimlibs-4.6.2 =A0 =A0Libraries for KDE-PIM applications > kdeplasma-addons-4.6.2 Extra plasmoids for KDE4 > kdesdk-4.6.2 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0KDE Software Development Kit > kdetoys-4.6.2 =A0 =A0 =A0 Collection of entertaining programs for KDE > kdeutils-4.6.2 =A0 =A0 =A0Utilities for the KDE4 integrated X11 Desktop > > > Is portsclean doing something wrong here or am I missing something? isn't= it > supposed to cross info with the installed packeges database before deleti= ng > the distfiles, even if you "csuped" the ports tree? The version of KDE in the ports tree is 4.6.3, the current May updates version. You may have brought your ports tree up to date, and portsclean is just removing the unreferenced 4.6.2 files. Whether you have them installed or not is not the key. It is whether they are referenced by a port in *your* ports tree, which they are not. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 04:20:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A9C106566C for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 04:20:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6E78FC08 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 04:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywf7 with SMTP id 7so1871543ywf.13 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 21:20:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Tu7226qKPKiGk45VPcDvoYzsxbH94IN6NDYspIIZ0+c=; b=OHI4d2dteFMeBSgSsC8aQ0Inyeq0Wskz7ph3V6t2XPaxBuRuQDP11XhnpT95xQl7Bw Z+CFSJVBeARaHHBr6hTTbPKpTgwGwJ9GjQi4WYMn3C+27EvbtFbjFtUBMs59gppt4Ljn nMcZs1CNlidBUqiaDmqEZPwHkqN0oa+qH4BHQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=BwCw7IezWdxM9H34MXXoctJiOsEhlnc2d6ZdaRZJUu1LW7kcHcphSsIXi9AwX99QqG NDWq3xS91qlAxt/c9Z++tMD630FihK8zFP03I7ANoKmv9GnWuuaSCG6fRXgsD670hd/p DsafU2VrTrd6AkuM/r+dzsKG2o0QJcb5vRc1o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.205.22 with SMTP id h22mr2885400anq.14.1306729242051; Sun, 29 May 2011 21:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.131.9 with HTTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 21:20:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201105292349.50921.lobo@bsd.com.br> References: <201105292349.50921.lobo@bsd.com.br> Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 00:20:42 -0400 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Funny thing with portsclean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 04:20:43 -0000 Sorry, I didn't mention why. You need use -DD if you don't want that to happen, and you want it to follow installed packages as well. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 06:24:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08ABE106566C for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:24:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plaine@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CC18FC18 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:24:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so1602974ewy.13 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 23:24:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=a9bYDD1jtcGP8anOUgbapcRqtfwDXJupjAW76gb8ctU=; b=trgvPqKK3QtaPqWEOEcI4GeXreYXvJhQeeRyrkuRheI4gURPOkRFu5HFDdG9eQku5R sb4oWvGkts6ufJYNGE+A8MeG096MUgSdCvzPMGUcN01WV8Uh6ntp0xIurOmTRUG8Uwtu MsjTvf1E/09TzObFLCslAWOzCNAozFUWNDlpc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=IOCJiZnXl3bnG/z0iRyR2vN5ATqnL/EJoiv3efXLOieDRhpygaUMy7G2I9dGBsp+GG eLxUXjg3DVdsbfQvFks0aKJIpTTbZhHuh7pgF+yqhm2Siuh/15yIZlL+FwoO6RQpwqhB euCD/HmGtw4ZvpY17BgUk1ARJ3cJvfmV9KCOM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.38.84 with SMTP id z60mr1566410eea.6.1306736645585; Sun, 29 May 2011 23:24:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.45.8 with HTTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 23:24:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 09:24:05 +0300 Message-ID: From: pepe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: remote password change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 06:24:08 -0000 On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 7:17 AM, pepe wrote: > >> Or better yet, automatic migration of >> password so if user changes password for server A it would change in >> server >> B too. Are there some solutions to do this? >> > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-nis.html > > -- > Adam Vande More > I ran into little problem with NIS. problem is that UIDs are different for all users in both server. So is it still possible to sync passwords with NIS with different UIDs? -- pepe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 06:31:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEE6106564A for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:31:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plaine@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9528FC17 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so1604617ewy.13 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 23:31:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=v8v8vLTHUi8/CIB0yhQX9lvks9tEOY9UkSX56MLpIFc=; b=prhd7T1fsA9x5TmUSlMeSoOB0lmVyCEt14/Ys8AgIMVzEr7YlekkYghsl9e0w5NrV1 FUmGrkZikl8meh7LNMy+pYeyx+8L1XNlDnL3vWUhRw1+r3CQ2ao3GeD5o0DTbaoonMls L01KznAImyE/rAJmWu8A3PGx47qI3REBgs6u8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=k0VuULP/8ZJPWbw8Dm1kjlfXVpX44TMQWJ9FIdMsDKkcq2HrUxBPt3SAcLAmQC8Z0F VLbdYRoUIFOfFC/FyzV5vxfufSYYsPGZb2QODii0QVJ/+lIVmdYA3HlHYlofl+qy76Qp aCi1psRELL/nfTq8F5kkQo6T3JgwFe65ep9jc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.38.84 with SMTP id z60mr1568336eea.6.1306737092268; Sun, 29 May 2011 23:31:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.45.8 with HTTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 23:31:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 09:31:32 +0300 Message-ID: From: pepe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: remote password change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 06:31:34 -0000 On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 3:17 PM, pepe wrote: > I have two FreeBSD 8 servers running. Server A is for shell access and > server B for www pages. On B there is only scp/sftp access and no shell > login. > Now I'm looking for solution for people to be able to change password for > server B from inside server A. Or better yet, automatic migration of > password so if user changes password for server A it would change in server > B too. Are there some solutions to do this? > > -- > pepe > So. I did look into NIS but it seems little problematic with different UIDs on all users in different servers. And the thing is I don't really need to sync passwords that much. It would be enough if there is way to just change passwords in ftp/scp server with shell access only into other server. If there is not this kind of solution then web-application would be ok too if there are any? NIS would be good, but seems little heavy solution since all that I really need right now between these servers is access for some people to change their ftp password... -- pepe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 06:48:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B24D1065677 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:48:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ndhertbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAFCF8FC18 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyj12 with SMTP id 12so4171742iyj.13 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 23:48:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=dy6Qrgk9v2pKEENrWIrfhHZMIE2gWmycR5LJ8261P+A=; b=tBTcUIS40leTp48XjPE7CKeVsYfF9/CA5ctfN6gvk47fwuBuZD9pfB2zTkZzwH7Ucn JkJEcZMNPEPzVJEo8VHEcioYha8mYHuZzAZB1jBwxkO+RQVtlBCF4KnpELVs3w3K+tEC st0SgWbJLUD4ja0uFHlR16QLWzkiW3olBfJ2Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=PZf4gcq0VtmpEpMOHrKh5PSpwfPHD6bqNl6sGzJaN2jXz7I/YfFiNR26IvGSUHFtiz /GjvglbmljHh7NUsbcjoIi8aWEglxITCRsVpbXNLTr90n5Z9TU+8DtrIDBh8XD3fE94z zD+6koNwm0rydr3WuTieNkiG4WC+JBAkBuMfI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.1.12 with SMTP id 12mr9401690ice.366.1306738098238; Sun, 29 May 2011 23:48:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.208.81 with HTTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 23:48:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 08:48:18 +0200 Message-ID: From: n dhert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: cmpsfont-1.0_7 checksum mismatch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 06:48:19 -0000 There seems to be an error with the recently (5 days ago) distributed new 1.0_7 version of cmpsfont: ---> Upgrading 'cmpsfont-1.0_6' to 'cmpsfont-1.0_7' (print/cmpsfont) ---> Build of print/cmpsfont started at: Mon, 30 May 2011 08:29:15 +0200 ---> Building '/usr/ports/print/cmpsfont' ===> Cleaning for cmpsfont-1.0_7 ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE ===> Extracting for cmpsfont-1.0_7 => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for cmps-unix.tar.gz. ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: cmps-unix.tar.gz ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE => cmps-unix.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.ctex.org/pub/tex/fonts/type1/cmps-unix.tar.gz ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for cmps-unix.tar.gz. ===> Giving up on fetching files: cmps-unix.tar.gz How to deal with it? Or wait for a better version? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 09:09:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75569106566B for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 09:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mx1.bjare.net (mx1.bjare.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CE18FC13 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 09:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796D65E008 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 10:48:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx1.bjare.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.442 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.442 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.158, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] Received: from mx1.bjare.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.bjare.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id abvDXjQmWZeS for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 10:48:46 +0200 (CEST) X-BN-MX1: ja X-BN-MailInfo: BjareNet Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7914C5E053 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 10:48:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4DE35A02.6000406@eskk.nu> Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 10:49:06 +0200 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110527 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: After freebsd-update.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 09:09:56 -0000 My system still is shows #0 8.2-RELEASE #0 Following the latest FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-11:02.bind I did # freebsd-update fetch # freebsd-update install And a reboot, but my system doesn't indicate the update! Any suggestions ? Thanks /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 10:09:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01022106564A for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 10:09:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC318FC13 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 10:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.local (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p4UA9AEw089706 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 11:09:17 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p4UA9AEw089706 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1306750157; bh=OmQwFgTroJVncYSQN5oO1LMSY6gfvmKk98Zn3U/gBOg=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4DE36CBF.6060602@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20M on,=2030=20May=202011=2011:09:03=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20en-US=3B=20r v:1.9.2.17)=20Gecko/20110414=20Thunderbird/3.1.10|MIME-Version:=20 1.0|To:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20After=20f reebsd-update....|References:=20<4DE35A02.6000406@eskk.nu>|In-Repl y-To:=20<4DE35A02.6000406@eskk.nu>|X-Enigmail-Version:=201.1.1|Ope nPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg =3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0 D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enigED7583C18B1358FD368490BD"; b=bBIDx1+3re8Oh/yBCA1G3PsKIuYCfIlD+iqjOxQZiP42vXPVRiwXfOyr4kP7ZWdOV Pnzn8ijVZERmsSUHhRPBBqUUiWIb+be+Oocp/8WpFzKqBiGAgz1+AHXCXgzhs115Wg rarFA0azAfl5c5/T1eQryrwZZwoihVlnQgYSbwuA= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163] claimed to be seedling.local Message-ID: <4DE36CBF.6060602@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 11:09:03 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4DE35A02.6000406@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: <4DE35A02.6000406@eskk.nu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigED7583C18B1358FD368490BD" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: After freebsd-update.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 10:09:22 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigED7583C18B1358FD368490BD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 30/05/2011 09:49, Leslie Jensen wrote: >=20 > My system still is shows #0 >=20 > 8.2-RELEASE #0 >=20 >=20 > Following the latest FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-11:02.bind >=20 > I did >=20 > # freebsd-update fetch > # freebsd-update install >=20 > And a reboot, but my system doesn't indicate the update! >=20 > Any suggestions ? You have applied the update successfully. You won't see any difference in the output from uname(1) because this update when applied via freebsd-update(8) doesn't touch the kernel. It only affects named(8). This is the patched version in 8.2-STABLE: % /usr/sbin/named -v BIND 9.6.-ESV-R4-P1 Since this update doesn't touch the kernel, it isn't necessary to reboot to apply it: simply restart named(8) if you're running it. If you're not running named then the vulnerability addressed by the patch doesn't exist on your server. You should however be concerned about the version of named running on any recursive resolvers listed in /etc/resolv.conf. Even if you aren't running named(8) it's worth applying the update just in case you do later decide to run it. If you had applied the security patches to the source code and recompiled, or had updated to the latest X.Y-STABLE sources, you would have an updated newvers.sh and consequently an updated output from uname(1) -- but this is just bookkeeping and makes no functional difference to the system. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigED7583C18B1358FD368490BD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk3jbMYACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxOqQCfVMtTaAfbJs13FtJHSFyyFAxM i68An2LQsqr+3qMf/uu75RXfd2tcoPRk =rL+3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigED7583C18B1358FD368490BD-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 10:29:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE2E1065672 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 10:29:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07B28FC18 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 10:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bb.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.89]) by services.ipt.ru with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1QQzGh-000A4H-Ls; Mon, 30 May 2011 14:00:15 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov To: =?utf-8?B?0JrQvtC90YzQutC+0LIg0JXQstCz0LXQvdC40Lk=?= References: <1857504788.20110518220129@yandex.ru> <469A67A7-8F08-4A02-8AB2-03019FDE5065@mac.com> <218834106.20110518220711@yandex.ru> <15710232314.20110518222125@yandex.ru> <3D67F8F7-8892-494C-985C-581DDF6CA4AD@mac.com> <120581865.20110518231534@yandex.ru> <936691689.20110528214641@yandex.ru> <4DE14694.1020309@gmx.de> <1678374264.20110528235537@yandex.ru> <854814211.20110529230803@yandex.ru> Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 14:00:14 +0400 In-Reply-To: <854814211.20110529230803@yandex.ru> (=?utf-8?B?ItCa0L7QvdGM?= =?utf-8?B?0LrQvtCyINCV0LLQs9C10L3QuNC5Iidz?= message of "Sun, 29 May 2011 23:08:03 +0300") Message-ID: <47001617@bb.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to install doc for 9-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 10:29:38 -0000 On Sun, 29 May 2011 23:08:03 +0300 Коньков Евгений wrote: > How to install 'man' pages? they are not included in .iso and there > are not on link you advice. If you use current, then you know how to build and install world. Just do it. ;-) -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 11:04:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3377E106566B for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 11:04:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@probikesllc.com) Received: from relay00.pair.com (relay00.pair.com [209.68.5.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5D978FC08 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 11:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71604 invoked from network); 30 May 2011 11:04:50 -0000 Received: from 24.3.206.175 (HELO ?172.16.70.114?) (24.3.206.175) by relay00.pair.com with SMTP; 30 May 2011 11:04:50 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 24.3.206.175 Message-ID: <4DDEB7E6.4000106@probikesllc.com> Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 16:28:22 -0400 From: Brian Seklecki Organization: CE-Pro Bikes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jaime Kikpole References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dell R210 "no disks found" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: seklecki@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 11:04:52 -0000 On 5/26/2011 3:16 PM, Jaime Kikpole wrote: > I am attempting to install FreeBSD 8.2 amd64 from a CD onto a Dell > R210 server. When I boot and run fdisk from sysinstall (under > "Custom"), it tells me "No disks found!" and then points me to the > hardware guide. Nothing in the hardware guide really seems to apply. Does it have a SAS 6/ir controller? Or a PERC variant? The former is software-assist and the driver is brand new. Remember, Dell and LSI would club a baby seal over the head to save a buck. That driver is in 8.2 but you'll need to get us a copy of the DMESG from your CD boot. If you cant get the network to come up from the FixIt image, try copy'ing /var/run/dmesg to a thumb drive and sneaker-net it. Post the dmesg to http://www.nycbug.org/index.php?NAV=dmesgd;SQLIMIT=20 ~BAS > Any one else get FreeBSD installed on an R210? Is there a BIOS > setting that I need to check or something? I've spent about a week on > this and will need to return both R210s soon if I can't get them > working. > > Thanks, > Jaime Kikpole > -- Brian A. Seklecki CE-Pro Bikes, LLC 412-378-3823 (m) PGP Key Available Upon Request From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 11:19:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0AB1106564A for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 11:19:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74DAB8FC17 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 11:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywf7 with SMTP id 7so2001846ywf.13 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 04:19:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.115.168 with SMTP id e28mr5400329yhh.334.1306754385945; Mon, 30 May 2011 04:19:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (twdp-174-109-142-001.nc.res.rr.com [174.109.142.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v44sm2401880yhl.27.2011.05.30.04.19.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 30 May 2011 04:19:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3Qjb7z5wgdz2CG44 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 07:19:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 07:19:43 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20110530071943.09c27cac@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4DDEB7E6.4000106@probikesllc.com> References: <4DDEB7E6.4000106@probikesllc.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Dell R210 "no disks found" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 11:19:48 -0000 On Thu, 26 May 2011 16:28:22 -0400 Brian Seklecki articulated: > Remember, Dell and LSI would club a baby seal over the head to save a > buck. A buck that I dare say you don't mind saving when purchasing said unit. -- Jerry ✌ jerry+fbsd@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or ignored. Do not CC this poster. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 11:45:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F236D106566B for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 11:45:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from www.liukuma.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:28:38a::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7AD8FC13 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 11:45:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.liukuma.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43E01CC8F for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 14:45:29 +0300 (EEST) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 www.liukuma.net E43E01CC8F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=liukuma.net; s=liukudkim; t=1306755930; bh=RxQ3HOG8+FDQ3G65KJseinT1K+elSmMEzx2pBc+VUJE=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; z=X-Virus-Scanned:=20amavisd-new=20at=20liukuma.net|X-DKIM:=20Sendm ail=20DKIM=20Filter=20v2.8.3=20www.liukuma.net=207DDC21CC8D|Messag e-ID:=20<37D0F07B1C3040A79FBB8EC06C589241@rivendell>|From:=20"Reko =20Turja"=20|To:=20|References:=20<4DE35A02.6000406@eskk.nu>=20<4DE36CBF.6060 602@infracaninophile.co.uk>|In-Reply-To:=20<4DE36CBF.6060602@infra caninophile.co.uk>|Subject:=20Re:=20After=20freebsd-update....|Dat e:=20Mon,=2030=20May=202011=2014:45:36=20+0300|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=0D=0A=09format=3Dflowed=3B=0D=0A=09 charset=3D"iso-8859-1"=3B=0D=0A=09reply-type=3Doriginal|Content-Tr ansfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable|X-Priority:=203|X-MSMail-Prior ity:=20Normal|Importance:=20Normal|X-Mailer:=20Microsoft=20Windows =20Live=20Mail=2014.0.8117.416|X-MimeOLE:=20Produced=20By=20Micros oft=20MimeOLE=20V14.0.8117.416; b=PwMyW5mN1NV5lMq0bybkQyL+zRfaTTeHp8ZUbPdhiK2JM8W5qNqk9ffoWt6NusC7J xjLdvW2MI4Cx7ioo3n2XYlcCQ+itp/lMuqQ/KXWtdz5m+/9iJWC8pIDrMgiZAYDPDa Iu85Rnw7wdpbOX3YOB3Y5JfR3+MhsG5x6/IWEadc= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at liukuma.net Received: from www.liukuma.net ([127.0.0.1]) by www.liukuma.net (www.liukuma.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 8-qA-bu3d82g for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 14:45:25 +0300 (EEST) Received: from rivendell (a91-155-174-194.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.155.174.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: ignatz@www.liukuma.net) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DDC21CC8D for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 14:45:25 +0300 (EEST) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 www.liukuma.net 7DDC21CC8D Message-ID: <37D0F07B1C3040A79FBB8EC06C589241@rivendell> From: "Reko Turja" To: References: <4DE35A02.6000406@eskk.nu> <4DE36CBF.6060602@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4DE36CBF.6060602@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 14:45:36 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 Subject: Re: After freebsd-update.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 11:45:55 -0000 > You have applied the update successfully. You won't see any=20 > difference > in the output from uname(1) because this update when applied via > freebsd-update(8) doesn't touch the kernel. It only affects=20 > named(8). > This is the patched version in 8.2-STABLE: > % /usr/sbin/named -v > BIND 9.6.-ESV-R4-P1 Interestingly my system updated from source shows still: /usr/src# /usr/sbin/named -v BIND 9.6.-ESV-R3 ncache.c was updated though, but version number nor any other bind=20 files were touched. -Reko=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 12:25:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECBE106564A for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 12:25:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C54D8FC08 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 12:25:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QR1Xe-0007My-GA for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 05:25:54 -0700 Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 05:25:54 -0700 (PDT) From: timp To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1306758354492-4439202.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <37D0F07B1C3040A79FBB8EC06C589241@rivendell> References: <4DE35A02.6000406@eskk.nu> <4DE36CBF.6060602@infracaninophile.co.uk> <37D0F07B1C3040A79FBB8EC06C589241@rivendell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: After freebsd-update.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 12:25:55 -0000 did you rebuild the world? -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/After-freebsd-update-tp4438777p4439202.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 12:49:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6619F1065780 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 12:49:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from www.liukuma.net (www.liukuma.net [IPv6:2001:470:28:38a::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C0F8FC14 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 12:49:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.liukuma.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 825371CC8D for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 15:49:17 +0300 (EEST) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 www.liukuma.net 825371CC8D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=liukuma.net; s=liukudkim; t=1306759757; bh=bO1QuZCz1pTdAVjJ1F6uBcnaVQBlbYKP2a6SYYp8nPg=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; z=X-Virus-Scanned:=20amavisd-new=20at=20liukuma.net|X-DKIM:=20Sendm ail=20DKIM=20Filter=20v2.8.3=20www.liukuma.net=20CE5F01CC8B|Messag e-ID:=20<611E099F8A6D45FDAFBAC61D98C57294@rivendell>|From:=20"Reko =20Turja"=20|To:=20|References:=20<4DE35A02.6000406@eskk.nu><4DE36CBF.6060602 @infracaninophile.co.uk><37D0F07B1C3040A79FBB8EC06C589241@rivendel l>=20<1306758354492-4439202.post@n5.nabble.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<13 06758354492-4439202.post@n5.nabble.com>|Subject:=20Re:=20After=20f reebsd-update....|Date:=20Mon,=2030=20May=202011=2015:49:25=20+030 0|MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=0D=0A=09format =3Dflowed=3B=0D=0A=09charset=3D"iso-8859-1"=3B=0D=0A=09reply-type= 3Doriginal|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable|X-Priorit y:=203|X-MSMail-Priority:=20Normal|Importance:=20Normal|X-Mailer:= 20Microsoft=20Windows=20Live=20Mail=2014.0.8117.416|X-MimeOLE:=20P roduced=20By=20Microsoft=20MimeOLE=20V14.0.8117.416; b=sI4/CiytqngwmFw9bIUdSRVQ2u5jCIdEeP2yehD0/CJb6hdOn0CHfNmyGkjpUIT8J P+S8fVqnk0A5nbdHg2kzufNl95qCEU2xTQqvyCaeRG6S8cKQcQ2mJITLoYy7qHkPlh ezGt4vVllIvssUKNLUZJkVd9c1tiTtnaIcIy2z20= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at liukuma.net Received: from www.liukuma.net ([127.0.0.1]) by www.liukuma.net (www.liukuma.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 2ySr6oSMUIXv for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 15:49:14 +0300 (EEST) Received: from rivendell (a91-155-174-194.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.155.174.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: ignatz@www.liukuma.net) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE5F01CC8B for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 15:49:13 +0300 (EEST) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 www.liukuma.net CE5F01CC8B Message-ID: <611E099F8A6D45FDAFBAC61D98C57294@rivendell> From: "Reko Turja" To: References: <4DE35A02.6000406@eskk.nu><4DE36CBF.6060602@infracaninophile.co.uk><37D0F07B1C3040A79FBB8EC06C589241@rivendell> <1306758354492-4439202.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1306758354492-4439202.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 15:49:25 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 Subject: Re: After freebsd-update.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 12:49:19 -0000 > did you rebuild the world? Ran makeworld and installworld twice to be sure of the version number=20 staying the same :) -Reko=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 14:02:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA8E106566B for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 14:02:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E4A8FC0C for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 14:02:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so4305117bwz.13 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 07:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.81.196 with SMTP id y4mr4386763bkk.111.1306764137832; Mon, 30 May 2011 07:02:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from st62.public.fotolog.net (angel.c-mal.com [82.241.189.111]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x6sm3447131bkv.12.2011.05.30.07.02.15 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 30 May 2011 07:02:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DE3A364.5040404@my.gd> Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 16:02:12 +0200 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Dell R210 "no disks found" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 14:02:20 -0000 On 5/26/11 9:16 PM, Jaime Kikpole wrote: > I am attempting to install FreeBSD 8.2 amd64 from a CD onto a Dell > R210 server. When I boot and run fdisk from sysinstall (under > "Custom"), it tells me "No disks found!" and then points me to the > hardware guide. Nothing in the hardware guide really seems to apply. > > Any one else get FreeBSD installed on an R210? Is there a BIOS > setting that I need to check or something? I've spent about a week on > this and will need to return both R210s soon if I can't get them > working. > > Thanks, > Jaime Kikpole > If your r210 has a h200 RAID card, then it is *not* supported in the 8.2 iso images. It is supported through the mps driver in 8.2-RELEASE though. You'll need to go in the RAID setup to destroy the logical device. Next, you'll need to download Martin Matuska's MFSBSD and rebuild it with the 8.2-RELEASE sources to include the mps driver in the kernel. Once you've booted from that, you'll be able to see your hard drives as /dev/da0 and /dev/da1 You will have to create a software RAID using either gmirror or ZFS, and install the OS on your mirror. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 14:50:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D7C106564A for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 14:50:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DAE38FC13 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 14:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4UEo2Rk010075 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 08:50:02 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p4UEo2FS010072 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 08:50:02 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 08:50:02 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 30 May 2011 08:50:02 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Subject: I486_CPU or I586_CPU in kernel config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 14:50:03 -0000 Some time back, there was a post on one of the mailing lists that suggested it was better to leave either I486_CPU or I586_CPU enabled in a kernel config even for much newer processors. For performance reasons, AFAIR. Naturally I didn't save that post or a link to it. Can anyone find that message, or explain why it would be good to keep either of those cpu options in a kernel that will only run on much newer CPUs? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 15:29:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310D210656E8 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 15:29:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from griffin@gnix.co.uk) Received: from think.gnix.co.uk (griffin.gnix.co.uk [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915488FC19 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 15:29:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from think.gnix.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by think.gnix.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4UFTE3J017897 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 16:29:14 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from griffin@gnix.co.uk) Received: (from jpg@localhost) by think.gnix.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p4UFTDwT017896 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 16:29:13 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from griffin@gnix.co.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: think.gnix.co.uk: jpg set sender to griffin@gnix.co.uk using -f Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 16:29:13 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110530152913.GA17861@think.gnix.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP-Key: http://www.gnix.co.uk/~jpg/jpg-pubkey.asc X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE X-URL: http://www.gnix.co.uk/~jpg/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: editors/openoffice.org-3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 15:29:16 -0000 Hello the build of this port fails due to a problem with the 'moz' module: ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/000330_m20/moz [ ... ] I found a thread sent to freebsd-openoffice@ earlier this month where several people said they had experienced this problem, the last message in it was dated 15 May 2011. No update after and no indication when the problem might be fixed. I wondered if anyone here has any more information about this? best wishes, jamie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 16:20:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B25106564A for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 16:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 159A28FC17 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 16:20:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from park.js.berklix.net (p5DCBD371.dip.t-dialin.net [93.203.211.113]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p4UGK8xX001356; Mon, 30 May 2011 16:20:09 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by park.js.berklix.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4UGK0p7029851; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:20:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p4UGJo7n011497; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:19:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201105301619.p4UGJo7n011497@fire.js.berklix.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Mon, 30 May 2011 16:29:13 BST." <20110530152913.GA17861@think.gnix.co.uk> Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 18:19:50 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: Jamie Paul Griffin Subject: Re: editors/openoffice.org-3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 16:20:11 -0000 Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: > Hello > the build of this port fails due to a problem with the 'moz' module: > ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making > /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/000330_m20/moz > [ ... ] > I found a thread sent to freebsd-openoffice@ earlier this month where > several people said they had experienced this problem, the last message > in it was dated 15 May 2011. No update after and no indication when the > problem might be fixed. > > I wondered if anyone here has any more information about this? I subscribed openoffice@freebsd.org list a few days back to catch any replies from my post Wed May 25 18:28:12 UTC 2011 about an error with instsetoo_native/ on both i386 & amd64 8.2-REL & current/poprts. Also no reply so far, Maybe not enough responsive people subscribed to openoffice@freebsd.org ? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-openoffice/2011-May/date.html Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Mail plain text; Not quoted-printable, Not HTML, Not base 64. Reply below text sections not at top, to avoid breaking cumulative context. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 16:31:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71661106566B for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 16:31:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from griffin@gnix.co.uk) Received: from think.gnix.co.uk (griffin.gnix.co.uk [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB938FC13 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 16:31:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from think.gnix.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by think.gnix.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4UGVYYF051111 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 17:31:35 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from griffin@gnix.co.uk) Received: (from jpg@localhost) by think.gnix.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p4UGVYOS051110 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 17:31:34 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from griffin@gnix.co.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: think.gnix.co.uk: jpg set sender to griffin@gnix.co.uk using -f Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 17:31:34 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110530163134.GA51087@think.gnix.co.uk> References: <20110530152913.GA17861@think.gnix.co.uk> <201105301619.p4UGJo7n011497@fire.js.berklix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201105301619.p4UGJo7n011497@fire.js.berklix.net> X-PGP-Key: http://www.gnix.co.uk/~jpg/jpg-pubkey.asc X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE X-URL: http://www.gnix.co.uk/~jpg/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: editors/openoffice.org-3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 16:31:36 -0000 On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 06:19:50PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > I subscribed openoffice@freebsd.org list a few days back to catch > any replies from my post Wed May 25 18:28:12 UTC 2011 about an error > with instsetoo_native/ on both i386 & amd64 8.2-REL & current/poprts. > Also no reply so far, > Maybe not enough responsive people subscribed to openoffice@freebsd.org ? Yes that was my reason for posting here in the hope i'd reach more people. I guess we'll just have to wait until someone gets round to fixing the problems. I wouldn't mind using one of the packages but they want perl version 5.12 and I don't want to use that just for OO. jamie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 16:39:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06295106566B for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 16:39:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plaine@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9048FC12 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 16:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so1809836ewy.13 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 09:39:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3H5YnRsjJ3dV0xt3+GOcKqw14BBhU0M1ENDDHV/0xJA=; b=ezpVWvn8euCuuAL1rXDCcRd8SPnCh+8zR1HS53xkvj+3MiiG6ztpOI6cfSyX/BSIQr wCe12jSmK1adV2k8WOdP4Ce1XR7ePEkVel5lZIlpcRsv3mxfsxoYhdO5Y6P7FVH01o9/ dkO0HiT6/8OGBmA684LgrWBCSVdLCRiG2Hhg4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=YP1Z8pRqZke3vvTGlScUp18Otou4QqiM8jAiFbet6iROx81qWxdRQxrsTvXxCvdCTc oZmR68m0HgK7sbB+FVcVVSw1sW0IqF1EDqLKamxtXhLPBU+/JUEyB8mvd/pddcbKU4B6 rOChcH54YRvBOAk26Aj1zYxvvO3WdvdMnNK6g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.18.19 with SMTP id k19mr1829582eek.166.1306773543399; Mon, 30 May 2011 09:39:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.45.8 with HTTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 09:39:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 19:39:03 +0300 Message-ID: From: pepe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: remote password change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 16:39:05 -0000 On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 9:31 AM, pepe wrote: > > > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 3:17 PM, pepe wrote: > >> I have two FreeBSD 8 servers running. Server A is for shell access and >> server B for www pages. On B there is only scp/sftp access and no shell >> login. >> Now I'm looking for solution for people to be able to change password for >> server B from inside server A. Or better yet, automatic migration of >> password so if user changes password for server A it would change in server >> B too. Are there some solutions to do this? >> >> -- >> pepe >> > > > So. I did look into NIS but it seems little problematic with different UIDs > on all users in different servers. And the thing is I don't really need to > sync passwords that much. It would be enough if there is way to just change > passwords in ftp/scp server with shell access only into other server. If > there is not this kind of solution then web-application would be ok too if > there are any? NIS would be good, but seems little heavy solution since all > that I really need right now between these servers is access for some people > to change their ftp password... > > -- > pepe > Ok. Problem solved. I just had to run nis server on other server B and then password can be changed from server A with yppasswd -h host.server.A Thank's for suggestions everyone! -- pepe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 17:34:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053961065677 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 17:34:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.de) Received: from pukruppa.de (pd95cabe3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.92.171.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4B28FC1C for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 17:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pukruppa.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pukruppa.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4UH8dBx018221 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 19:08:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.de) Message-ID: <4DE3CF17.6020704@pukruppa.de> Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 19:08:39 +0200 From: "Kruppa, Peter Ulrich" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; de-DE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110309 Thunderbird/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20110530152913.GA17861@think.gnix.co.uk> <201105301619.p4UGJo7n011497@fire.js.berklix.net> <20110530163134.GA51087@think.gnix.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110530163134.GA51087@think.gnix.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: editors/openoffice.org-3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 17:34:24 -0000 Hi! Am 30.05.2011 18:31, schrieb Jamie Paul Griffin: > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 06:19:50PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > >> I subscribed openoffice@freebsd.org list a few days back to catch >> any replies from my post Wed May 25 18:28:12 UTC 2011 about an >> error with instsetoo_native/ on both i386& amd64 8.2-REL& >> current/poprts. Also no reply so far, Maybe not enough responsive >> people subscribed to openoffice@freebsd.org ? > > Yes that was my reason for posting here in the hope i'd reach more > people. I guess we'll just have to wait until someone gets round to > fixing the problems. I am watching this list for some time now and really am afraid the OOo porting team seriously lacks manpower. So if you can't help you better install with pkg_add -f option - that will probably work. Greetings Peter. > > I wouldn't mind using one of the packages but they want perl version > 5.12 and I don't want to use that just for OO. > > jamie _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To > unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Peter Ulrich Kruppa Wuppertal Germany From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 17:41:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14575106566B for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 17:41:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dieterbsd@engineer.com) Received: from mailout-us.mail.com (mailout-us.gmx.com [74.208.5.67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 962BF8FC16 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 17:41:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10353 invoked by uid 0); 30 May 2011 17:41:02 -0000 Received: from 67.206.163.100 by rms-us012.v300.gmx.net with HTTP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 17:41:00 +0000 From: "Dieter BSD" Message-ID: <20110530174102.95230@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Authenticated: #74169980 X-Flags: 0001 X-Mailer: GMX.com Web Mailer x-registered: 0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-GMX-UID: n+TFZRqCiDz7blSaAW9pFpZrZml1ZBgf Subject: xpdf does not accept input from keyboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 17:41:04 -0000 FreeBSD 8.2  amd64 xpdf version 3.02 whines: Warning: translation table syntax error: Unknown keysym name:  osfActivate Warning: ... found while parsing ':osfActivate:            ManagerParentActivate()' Warning: String to TranslationTable conversion encountered errors Warning: translation table syntax error: Unknown keysym name:  osfBeginLine Warning: ... found while parsing ':osfBeginLine:           ManagerGadgetTraverseHome()' Warning: String to TranslationTable conversion encountered errors Warning: translation table syntax error: Unknown keysym name:  osfHelp Warning: ... found while parsing ':osfHelp:                        ManagerGadgetHelp()' Warning: String to TranslationTable conversion encountered errors Warning: Cannot allocate colormap entry for default background. Warning: translation table syntax error: Unknown keysym name:  osfActivate Warning: ... found while parsing ':osfActivate:    PrimitiveParentActivate()' Warning: String to TranslationTable conversion encountered errors Warning: translation table syntax error: Unknown keysym name:  osfHelp Warning: ... found while parsing ':osfHelp:                Help()' ... Warning: translation table syntax error: Unknown keysym name:  osfCancel Warning: ... found while parsing 'osfCancel:                       MenuEscape()' Warning: String to TranslationTable conversion encountered errors Warning: translation table syntax error: Unknown keysym name:  osfActivate Warning: ... found while parsing ':osfActivate:    PrimitiveParentActivate()' Warning: String to TranslationTable conversion encountered errors Warning: translation table syntax error: Unknown keysym name:  osfSelect Warning: ... found while parsing ':osfSelect:      ArmAndActivate()' Warning: String to TranslationTable conversion encountered errors Warning: Cannot convert string "-*-times-bold-i-normal--20-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1" to type FontStruct Warning: Cannot convert string "-*-times-medium-r-normal--14-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1" to type FontStruct Warning: Color name "LightYellow" is not defined And then seems to mostly work, except that it does not notice any input from the keyboard.  Clicking on buttons with the mouse works as expected, but attempting to paste text into the find text box does not work. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 20:47:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F3C1065674 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 20:47:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF368FC0C for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 20:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so3793452fxm.13 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 13:47:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=D7pxbxOnwgJ+tyieFg8fn9sgHAVN3gHbj+g9hxyUV3A=; b=xN1TOMBM4gkaI1Na+WKf2vMiRigjOY49osWbb5p1zjzYm5dUrEBGasYKYlggGdQBpK dyi6YorrBDYHeFp1NFQBU9FT83AGwgmb23e6e0KilivwT/gnORKg/c6cYegUbhIfiuub ZXSOIhWY3zbRfLGDsaGoQpp0bhef/oWzUSa1o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=kinX/MuBnPm+slqyaZGyNgdWXCmNO2+A5OAYImUtGnhVR19VthThbUr72j+nxeRONO xpKO6nvGazTe1SQT7vPf0Bv4ijSDhjFTu3cAy/tRih/rsMfNwpgzXRP5icFgxXfsfUda I+M/xt0R3aEw1fwe3DSw/RwnZAfyAphWIhqBs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.21.215 with SMTP id k23mr1107053fab.88.1306788075454; Mon, 30 May 2011 13:41:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.118.148 with HTTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 13:41:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 15:41:15 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I486_CPU or I586_CPU in kernel config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 20:47:59 -0000 On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Warren Block wrote: > >> Some time back, there was a post on one of the mailing lists that >> suggested it was better to leave either I486_CPU or I586_CPU enabled in a >> kernel config even for much newer processors. For performance reasons, >> AFAIR. Naturally I didn't save that post or a link to it. >> >> Can anyone find that message, or explain why it would be good to keep >> either of those cpu options in a kernel that will only run on much newer >> CPUs? >> > > Um, I don't recall seeing that and have removed them automatically for a > long time. Here is one that suggests keeping I586_CPU with results that > seem less than conclusive. > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-December/020702.html > Perhaps this is the one you meant? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-January/190568.html Actually the two threads touch on the same subject, and it seems removal of those options is still desirable on newer CPU's. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 21:03:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF4E1065672 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 21:03:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A675E8FC08 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 21:03:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so3800068fxm.13 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 14:03:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=L0QZgbl7lFSQkcwpHAkU4/u5WoX7NUzIBjwLWJ+oR1o=; b=W5wqBkyuhOQcPmxwfZEihR80NYdkQ9MQIe0/CnIBR0HrzvUgYjv1/EpVVuKTQb0Sdd WxDi3+aCnHpC6/sw7CJaF8BhNaRuIl5OSyi0iCQpclR0qXhLT57b80uXRIUwr3IMsA4g daW3+6FQBGRTCHjiHMCNB2y9ygCWlm8YwRfzo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ST4xFUTdXvJNoXtyqIP3Q5BGIiZJRmuMHhJGUp0yEWMOmQFhpmr8sMQioZ+oqfRNr9 yhZZmE5Q0UmT1M5hb74QaOLFCu/iMXrYLjZ9hnT06+oLdcl69ZFyB215FhisvjfR5tO8 dalnbpOfwXzNYXggBfIRIAipN1rMJ4n8c85Oo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.13.10 with SMTP id z10mr502004faz.69.1306787730352; Mon, 30 May 2011 13:35:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.118.148 with HTTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 13:35:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 15:35:30 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I486_CPU or I586_CPU in kernel config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 21:03:19 -0000 On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Warren Block wrote: > Some time back, there was a post on one of the mailing lists that suggested > it was better to leave either I486_CPU or I586_CPU enabled in a kernel > config even for much newer processors. For performance reasons, AFAIR. > Naturally I didn't save that post or a link to it. > > Can anyone find that message, or explain why it would be good to keep > either of those cpu options in a kernel that will only run on much newer > CPUs? > Um, I don't recall seeing that and have removed them automatically for a long time. Here is one that suggests keeping I586_CPU with results that seem less than conclusive. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-December/020702.html -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 20:39:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6309D1065673 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 20:39:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward9.mail.yandex.net (forward9.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64548FC21 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 20:39:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp8.mail.yandex.net (smtp8.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.54]) by forward9.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id DCC00CE11F8; Tue, 31 May 2011 00:39:14 +0400 (MSD) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1306787954; bh=/bpoJEe8y128++gxe/NQpqJcGADx2KCY2QMxhrKuTjw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=eV7yyb3PJsWEc7vUhZvn4y9osMwWAqvcyagFivnA19+O4OFpxl5sKkXizdkja3frB Oae1suB+un67THWc0Ath+ZmpzcBquMVMNkIAZB3PraaL6g6V/+JIy8dU7WSZkBHMZ3 vANak+/dcYl6ZP6QVqouQ40ciwXBmwv74d1PL2sc= Received: from HOMEUSER (unknown [77.93.52.4]) by smtp8.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTPA id 74D60419006F; Tue, 31 May 2011 00:39:14 +0400 (MSD) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 23:39:14 +0300 From: =?koi8-r?B?68/O2MvP1yDl18fFzsnK?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: =?koi8-r?B?/vAg68/O2MvP1ywgRnJlZUxpbmU=?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <6117764.20110530233914@yandex.ru> To: Adam Vande More In-Reply-To: References: <1857504788.20110518220129@yandex.ru> <469A67A7-8F08-4A02-8AB2-03019FDE5065@mac.com> <218834106.20110518220711@yandex.ru> <15710232314.20110518222125@yandex.ru> <3D67F8F7-8892-494C-985C-581DDF6CA4AD@mac.com> <120581865.20110518231534@yandex.ru> <936691689.20110528214641@yandex.ru> <4DE14694.1020309@gmx.de> <1678374264.20110528235537@yandex.ru> <854814211.20110529230803@yandex.ru> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Yandex-Spam: 1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 30 May 2011 21:23:38 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Lokadamus , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[6]: How to install doc for 9-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?koi8-r?B?68/O2MvP1yDl18fFzsnK?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 20:39:17 -0000 Hello, Adam. That does not help. #man locate No manual entry for locate # > 2011/5/29 Kon'kov Evgenij <[1]kes-kes@yandex.ru> sorry, but that is not what I am looking for. How to install 'man' pages? they are not included in .iso and there are not on link you advice. I don't know how to install the man pages from the snapshot cd, but if you have the source for your version you can do: cd /usr/src/share/man make install -- Adam Vande More -- S uvazheniem, Kon'kov [2]mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru References 1. mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru 2. mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 21:51:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA70D106566B for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 21:51:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81D48FC18 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 21:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([10.128.143.51]) by hrndva-qmta03.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20110530213844018.WYXT3687@hrndva-qmta03.mail.rr.com> for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 21:38:44 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=NmbQexcdgr4rtO3OwYGrP5Q3rTMpacrTPhuaXkv4uP8= c=1 sm=0 a=ug5KbfaGlwcA:10 a=R5FhY6rjjCMA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=ihdCVQocfTjEhADgW3QxCA==:17 a=hzGsBIjeAAAA:8 a=_eQ5QOhl7B6k50OZ9CMA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=ihdCVQocfTjEhADgW3QxCA==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 98.155.227.43 Received: from [98.155.227.43] ([98.155.227.43:33511] helo=localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com) by hrndva-oedge01.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 8A/42-08391-D1E04ED4; Mon, 30 May 2011 21:37:34 +0000 Received: by localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8A0765C21; Mon, 30 May 2011 11:40:56 -1000 (HST) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 11:40:56 -1000 From: parv To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110530214056.GA4980@holstein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20110530152913.GA17861@think.gnix.co.uk> <201105301619.p4UGJo7n011497@fire.js.berklix.net> <20110530163134.GA51087@think.gnix.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110530163134.GA51087@think.gnix.co.uk> Subject: Re: editors/openoffice.org-3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 21:51:12 -0000 in message <20110530163134.GA51087@think.gnix.co.uk>, wrote Jamie Paul Griffin thusly... > > I wouldn't mind using one of the packages but they want perl version > 5.12 and I don't want to use that just for OO. Do you have another perl installed such that installing version 5.12 would cause much churn even if only to be replaced later? - parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 23:06:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E980106566C for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:06:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alekstef@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC11B8FC0A for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:06:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so1905586ewy.13 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 16:06:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-pgp-agent:x-mailer; bh=TcXQHTKgBnoGe/oKXKptNsfxEqSFahs+PXPhIpXvShg=; b=KPVLCHNZ0A0LyU4awEk9rCBX9l/Ghdslh5dMjynMePVSPio7eaiGTR25VwBcIUerMC VuH184U4gK6pTg1iq3fUpibhLmA1Y97AwQQjPwm6cUbIKUkOsv0RL15zCQ3Wu2zoZHT2 lxpSNGvN0D6YNUSxY2xybFnpRuCwKocHKnBhY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-pgp-agent :x-mailer; b=TxqZJWTBwj+RheXj8zeaksDVLchODyloCye9jiI4FwtPXYP2JDqQ6bjyy7UP98QM58 dZW84TNaI4fYgQSHFuQCs/uxlLBC8QhCP32RJkoyjLGuO7QhbfURdeqQbllLgZWvs61T Uz9sIzaqgaWXFDztc+Vhks5E7Sdl4vORpaUPo= Received: by 10.14.50.3 with SMTP id y3mr1867690eeb.225.1306795229716; Mon, 30 May 2011 15:40:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mbp-aleks.lan (21.80-202-249.nextgentel.com [80.202.249.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x3sm399697eef.3.2011.05.30.15.40.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 30 May 2011 15:40:28 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) From: Aleksander Steffensen In-Reply-To: <00c901cc1ba2$4ef08820$ecd19860$@wakefield.sch.uk> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 00:40:26 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <00c901cc1ba2$4ef08820$ecd19860$@wakefield.sch.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.3.3 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: Re: Trouble with LDAP-authentication to Apple Open Directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 23:06:23 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Anyone? If this is not the right place to ask, can someone please point = me in the right direction? Best regards, Aleksander Steffensen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN5BzbAAoJELxlbnDhBkKId8AIAKT0xR10dHOovyjSDCeoi5OA alAmkOY3lDk9Xa7k8I63VU4X80xvO/NjiHbRUPYFNmYCKMbAMJgnLnm5cQRiT6o0 xMJmMUX56NAmejxHl4k60DwMhb749WPF3FzUsWmR5nmZrK2Elk8yw8vDqn/Uqp0P 542oD6G9UfyDr6y1QOaRgaluJiGj/KliXw9pSPlAHQZQaNMUByk2u3ENjaMdnUR5 pDdXYmlnoV7UX2V8yB1JXb6VJWHinOOlufN9CcjDb8aKb4Q/6LYUCfdhuFDekMXB hNPq7Xn8Nk2RysU0E1nvQA1s2+j8llyM0KLm+w9/du4J5vkX2aGBy5uvMhqEtxA=3D =3DWYUb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 23:16:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226151065674 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:16:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C468FC0C for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so2281980gwb.13 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 16:16:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.99.18 with SMTP id b18mr3398004anm.120.1306797389969; Mon, 30 May 2011 16:16:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from papi.localnet ([177.17.101.111]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i6sm3596182anm.51.2011.05.30.16.16.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 30 May 2011 16:16:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Mario Lobo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 20:15:53 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-STABLE; KDE/4.6.2; amd64; ; ) References: <201105292349.50921.lobo@bsd.com.br> In-Reply-To: X-KMail-Markup: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201105302015.53954.lobo@bsd.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Robert Simmons Subject: Re: Funny thing with portsclean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 23:16:31 -0000 On Monday 30 May 2011 01:20:42 Robert Simmons wrote: > Sorry, I didn't mention why. You need use -DD if you don't want that > to happen, and you want it to follow installed packages as well. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Ahhhh !! It was my bad then. Thanks for the previous explanation also, Robert. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 23:20:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75992106566B for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:20:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378218FC14 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:20:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxl31 with SMTP id 31so2290069yxl.13 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 16:20:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.147.135.41 with SMTP id m41mr1551854yan.10.1306797625388; Mon, 30 May 2011 16:20:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from papi.localnet ([177.17.101.111]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g30sm2451316yhn.71.2011.05.30.16.20.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 30 May 2011 16:20:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Mario Lobo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 20:19:49 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-STABLE; KDE/4.6.2; amd64; ; ) References: <20110530152913.GA17861@think.gnix.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110530152913.GA17861@think.gnix.co.uk> X-KMail-Markup: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201105302019.50215.lobo@bsd.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Jamie Paul Griffin Subject: Re: editors/openoffice.org-3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 23:20:26 -0000 On Monday 30 May 2011 12:29:13 Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: > Hello > > the build of this port fails due to a problem with the 'moz' module: > > ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making > /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/000330_m20/moz > > [ ... ] > > I found a thread sent to freebsd-openoffice@ earlier this month where > several people said they had experienced this problem, the last message > in it was dated 15 May 2011. No update after and no indication when the > problem might be fixed. > > I wondered if anyone here has any more information about this? > > best wishes, > > jamie > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I just went ahead and compiled WITHOUT_MOZILLA. The error didn't show and OO compiled, installed and runs fine. I must say that I don't know precisely what functionality I am loosing with this though. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 23:32:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BFB106564A for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:32:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=01242b4d74=johnl@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [64.57.183.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A178FC13 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50869 invoked from network); 30 May 2011 23:06:11 -0000 Received: from mail1.iecc.com (64.57.183.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 30 May 2011 23:06:11 -0000 Date: 30 May 2011 23:05:49 -0000 Message-ID: <20110530230549.996.qmail@joyce.lan> From: "John Levine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20110530214056.GA4980@holstein.holy.cow> Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: editors/openoffice.org-3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 23:32:53 -0000 >> I wouldn't mind using one of the packages but they want perl version >> 5.12 and I don't want to use that just for OO. Either use -f to force it to go ahead anyway, and then pkgdb -F to fix the dependencies, or else unpack it, edit the dependecy file, repack it, and install it. The latter sounds gross but actually takes about five minutes. R's, John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 23:53:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E09E106564A for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:53:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F0408FC12 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 23:53:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4UNrXIa011649; Mon, 30 May 2011 17:53:33 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p4UNrWuh011646; Mon, 30 May 2011 17:53:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 17:53:32 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Adam Vande More In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 30 May 2011 17:53:33 -0600 (MDT) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I486_CPU or I586_CPU in kernel config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 23:53:34 -0000 On Mon, 30 May 2011, Adam Vande More wrote: > Perhaps this is the one you meant? > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-January/190568.html That's the one! Thanks! > Actually the two threads touch on the same subject, and it seems > removal of those options is still desirable on newer CPU's. sys/i386/i386/support.s is mentioned, but doesn't seem to have anything explicitly specific for 586. There are some i686 entries. A test for cpu_class==CPUCLASS_586 in /sys/i386/isa/npx.c is mentioned in the thread, but that check isn't in the current code. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 00:39:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8E9106564A for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 00:39:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319BB8FC0C for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 00:39:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so3879260fxm.13 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 17:39:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0RXx3AR/e/TMpTdUFd/L0AYm1YWZATCEtdWStJBxrx0=; b=VLX8s2+JFqJ/BbtXRWrPjihtOcHPYXAwrMuhjz5eN+12xPtom+XB2om2MpviFTXpvg lyMmrEBeYbSgqocrlsfkDnBzT91oNF4qI1Ah4Ja0MGQGWe5WkRpbCguwOhPylZ93PNS9 ZPNvf3qOkyHGxwuQ3HxGsEmteSWAb1jPssT4Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=J1fqsMwHFRfavvMVQx2vatMmpHdlWXmwDLkMhnL5WBDmWdgaOgU02/n5wPVabXvIVA H6bBodGfphibdnf7AJ/EGjDTTD4z+ect+dERinUiQznApHe7q4vrKoBxTJtkJjwTHWlI nsz/hxxrlgrUzHnkQiz7PheGS6tjMYdoZAU4U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.144.136 with SMTP id z8mr6188556fau.31.1306802395918; Mon, 30 May 2011 17:39:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.118.148 with HTTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 17:39:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 19:39:55 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I486_CPU or I586_CPU in kernel config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 00:39:57 -0000 On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Warren Block wrote: > sys/i386/i386/support.s is mentioned, but doesn't seem to have anything > explicitly specific for 586. There are some i686 entries. > > A test for cpu_class==CPUCLASS_586 in /sys/i386/isa/npx.c is mentioned in > the thread, but that check isn't in the current code. > Yeah, there doesn't seem to be concrete answer that's within my ability to diagnose. If you have some time and the burning desire, you could try some benchmark runs on each kernel to see if 686 is as preformant as 686/586. The first thread I posted seemed indicate a fairly noticeable slowdown when both were enabled, but there were perhaps problems with test methodology and of course that is quite old. Also seems like a good candidate question for hackers@ -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 01:16:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 813851065674 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 01:16:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0B48FC1F for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 01:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so4000917wyf.13 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:16:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2bUPpdm+SIBByn73jXneazyg/siyZMTR1vSvAnHYxLA=; b=EUe5i2O5N/OVLYPsDOktX4LNJ6a+rNonJ+K8PaVR+y4fXrQM6D7R2c/1XapDXR0m9K GTo5ReL/axA0YKlgfcLZPTaUsfDUPMvwF5BVXrzr+y8i1xoWeIDiiFdii0Ovlq1aPB/Q NmV5LbB9yJOtjmbuc+fzPaMBB5lZLRbeKmAYU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FpKXjzws8x3ibgkzEQa2EkTmKpAypLAnX5a92FLKOOVsLIxSPuMsZyIENgg1AxNnsH DNb77C5zurvRHyvfOrF88bOgRy4O9PbsiIsQZkmFni/5Swc5OletLKE4g+t8sEbq5srs bTzPf1Dzlnv+TaN2Vlew4zhgqEcLoqK4qxlNo= Received: by 10.217.2.202 with SMTP id p52mr3425196wes.28.1306804606920; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:16:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g2sm2800926weg.38.2011.05.30.18.16.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 30 May 2011 18:16:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 02:16:42 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110531021642.713c6a99@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <201105302015.53954.lobo@bsd.com.br> References: <201105292349.50921.lobo@bsd.com.br> <201105302015.53954.lobo@bsd.com.br> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Funny thing with portsclean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 01:16:48 -0000 On Mon, 30 May 2011 20:15:53 -0300 Mario Lobo wrote: > On Monday 30 May 2011 01:20:42 Robert Simmons wrote: > > Sorry, I didn't mention why. You need use -DD if you don't want > > that to happen, and you want it to follow installed packages as > > well. _______________________________________________ > > Ahhhh !! It was my bad then. Your mistake was assuming it was to do with the distfiles used to build installed packages, but the above comment is wrong -D deletes any distfile that doesn't have a hash value recorded anywhere in your complete ports tree. i.e. it only deletes files that have no use. -DD deletes any distfile that doesn't have a hash value recorded for the installed ports i.e. it additionally deletes distfiles that correspond to deleted packages, even though such files are still potentially useful if you need to reinstall. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 01:23:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562CD106566C for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 01:23:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68E28FC0A for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 01:23:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4V1FcBH015637; Tue, 31 May 2011 02:15:38 +0100 Received: from orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (80-45-152-196.static.dsl.as9105.com [80.45.152.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4V1FcGf015630; Tue, 31 May 2011 02:15:38 +0100 Received: by orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EA1B533C52; Tue, 31 May 2011 02:23:01 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 02:23:01 +0100 From: Frank Shute To: n dhert Message-ID: <20110531012301.GA5085@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE amd64 X-Organisation: 'shute.org.uk' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cmpsfont-1.0_7 checksum mismatch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 01:23:05 -0000 --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 08:48:18AM +0200, n dhert wrote: > > There seems to be an error with the recently (5 days ago) distributed new > 1.0_7 version of cmpsfont: >=20 > ---> Upgrading 'cmpsfont-1.0_6' to 'cmpsfont-1.0_7' (print/cmpsfont) > ---> Build of print/cmpsfont started at: Mon, 30 May 2011 08:29:15 +0200 > ---> Building '/usr/ports/print/cmpsfont' > =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for cmpsfont-1.0_7 > =3D=3D=3D> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > =3D=3D=3D> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > =3D=3D=3D> Extracting for cmpsfont-1.0_7 > =3D> SHA256 Checksum mismatch for cmps-unix.tar.gz. > =3D=3D=3D> Refetch for 1 more times files: cmps-unix.tar.gz > =3D=3D=3D> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > =3D=3D=3D> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > =3D> cmps-unix.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > =3D> Attempting to fetch > http://ftp.ctex.org/pub/tex/fonts/type1/cmps-unix.tar.gz > =3D=3D=3D> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > =3D=3D=3D> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > =3D> SHA256 Checksum mismatch for cmps-unix.tar.gz. > =3D=3D=3D> Giving up on fetching files: cmps-unix.tar.gz > > How to deal with it? > Or wait for a better version? send-pr(1) or drop the maintainer an email (he's probably forgotten to update the distinfo). If you must have the port *now* you can edit the port with the new checksum calculated using sha256(1).=20 (Edit /usr/ports/print/cmpsfont/distinfo) Regards, --=20 Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk3kQvUACgkQHduKvUAgeK56WACguCY2AlWMWB5bLt8hKgTdiS9Z uN8An10OPDDhYdj4RM9QLU8md/bCaidG =M4hb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 02:32:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B45106564A for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 02:32:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Received: from kane.compar.com (kane.compar.com [207.236.25.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6C18FC1B for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 02:32:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hermes (CPE002129cfd480-CM001ac3584898.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.236.129.198]) by kane.compar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3ED515B290B for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 22:19:46 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matt Emmerton" To: References: <20110531012301.GA5085@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110531012301.GA5085@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 22:13:16 -0400 Message-ID: <001901cc1f38$4dfe8fe0$e9fbafa0$@on.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcwfMjl55s6Rp0xVRV2i2RTfsfK6zwABT2sg Content-Language: en-us Subject: RE: cmpsfont-1.0_7 checksum mismatch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 02:32:05 -0000 On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 08:48:18AM +0200, n dhert wrote: > > There seems to be an error with the recently (5 days ago) distributed > new > 1.0_7 version of cmpsfont: > > ---> Upgrading 'cmpsfont-1.0_6' to 'cmpsfont-1.0_7' (print/cmpsfont) > ---> Build of print/cmpsfont started at: Mon, 30 May 2011 08:29:15 > ---> +0200 Building '/usr/ports/print/cmpsfont' > ===> Cleaning for cmpsfont-1.0_7 > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> License > check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE ===> Extracting for > cmpsfont-1.0_7 => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for cmps-unix.tar.gz. > ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: cmps-unix.tar.gz ===> > Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> License check > disabled, port has not defined LICENSE => cmps-unix.tar.gz doesn't > seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch > http://ftp.ctex.org/pub/tex/fonts/type1/cmps-unix.tar.gz > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> License > check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE => SHA256 Checksum > mismatch for cmps-unix.tar.gz. > ===> Giving up on fetching files: cmps-unix.tar.gz > > How to deal with it? > Or wait for a better version? send-pr(1) or drop the maintainer an email (he's probably forgotten to update the distinfo). If you must have the port *now* you can edit the port with the new checksum calculated using sha256(1). (Edit /usr/ports/print/cmpsfont/distinfo) ---------- Or this: cd /usr/ports/print/cmpsfont make fetch make makesum -- Matt Emmerton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 03:19:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841D61065672 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 03:19:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA27D8FC16 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 03:19:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so4865485bwz.13 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 20:19:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=5jfZZut95pRDROiVLN/VyUQ8hkm74XaF4cwwijXddcg=; b=W7OG9lqQjW9Zra5Xr6m6W6owXimcnYh/ayC14k98Aofv6nMfme7NxaUW0mAkoIKT/w xRPt2bE6zXPYCin+8Nd7+iwtais+VkUOxBaXeppkXeXK9wGkg82J0ae3zAT86G3t3tJv SbQ9f65ItmsZLJOrDLtUHQIu0kBza7Vgxt2KQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=cUBcoyq4s2zB5t0t0Yu1dFxSyd8BZGAEWAPA5QF5WtdnQIwbXVjKqrRxboXXcTT+f+ 5V7W7m8jzzF2MOyLHGnCrvlPtK/MidWwbmrbkW188Di9RKitrOIYege1O4y9PE9I1pLs gJFIy84+mxu4tviTcyjGf7ti2x1CHBwTBTRFU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.3.196 with SMTP id 4mr3105587bko.188.1306811980280; Mon, 30 May 2011 20:19:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.25.78 with HTTP; Mon, 30 May 2011 20:19:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 23:19:40 -0400 Message-ID: From: Xn Nooby To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: A small script to customize FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 03:19:42 -0000 Hello. I wrote a script to install FreeBSD 8.2 on to a real machine, or a 64-bit Virtualbox VM. It has a modular approach where you can pick which functions will be run on a different target system. It can be tweaked easily. I wrote it so that I could do a quick "plain vanilla install", and then run this script to set up my user, SVN server, gnome, firefox4, flash, nvidia driver, vbox additons, and other things. I thought I would post it in case other beginners need some thing like this to help them configure a machine. I started off with detailed notes, then thought I might as well script it. When you run it, the only user interaction is having to enter the user password twice. Let me know if anyone has any suggestions. #!/bin/sh loadMe() { echo loadMe... pw useradd -n theuser -s /bin/csh -m pw usermod theuser -G wheel,operator passwd theuser echo '#exec openbox-session' >> /home/theuser/.xinitrc chown theuser:theuser /home/theuser/.xinitrc chmod u+x /home/theuser/.xinitrc echo '#!/bin/sh' > /home/theuser/init_theuser.sh echo 'nspluginwrapper -v -a -i' >> /home/theuser/init_theuser.sh chown theuser:theuser /home/theuser/init_theuser.sh chmod u+x /home/theuser/init_theuser.sh } loadPorts() { echo loadPorts... freebsd-update fetch install portsnap fetch extract } loadX11() { echo loadX11... pkg_add -r xorg echo 'dbus_enable="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf echo 'hald_enable="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf /usr/local/etc/rc.d/hald start /usr/local/etc/rc.d/dbus start Xorg -configure sed ' /Section "Device"/ a\ Option "DRI" "Off" ' xorg.conf.new > xorg.conf.sed cp xorg.conf.sed /etc/X11/xorg.conf } loadSoundHP() { echo loadsoundHP... kldload snd_driver cat /dev/sndstat echo 'snd_atiixp_load="YES"' >> /boot/loader.conf echo 'snd_uaudio_load="YES"' >> /boot/loader.conf } loadSoundVMW() { echo loadsoundVMW... kldload snd_driver cat /dev/sndstat echo 'snd_es137x_load="YES"' >> /boot/loader.conf } loadSoundXPS() { echo loadsoundXPS... kldload snd_driver cat /dev/sndstat echo 'snd_hda_load="YES"' >> /boot/loader.conf } loadSoundVBX() { echo loadsoundVBX... kldload snd_driver cat /dev/sndstat echo 'snd_ich_load="YES"' >> /boot/loader.conf } loadFF() { echo loadFF... pkg_add -r firefox echo 'sem_load="YES"' >> /boot/loader.conf } loadApps() { echo loadApps... apps="bash unzip p7zip vlc xmms subversion mplayer openbox icewm cmdwatch xfe miro filezilla" for x in $apps do pkg_add -r $x done } loadVboxAdds() { echo loadVboxAdds... #cd /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-additions #make install clean pkg_add -r virtualbox-ose-additions echo 'vboxguest_enable="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf sed ' /Section "Screen"/ a\ DefaultDepth 24 ' /etc/X11/xorg.conf > /etc/X11/xorg.conf.sed cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf.sed /etc/X11/xorg.conf sed ' /Depth 24/ a\ Modes "1024x768" ' /etc/X11/xorg.conf > /etc/X11/xorg.conf.sed cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf.sed /etc/X11/xorg.conf sed -e 's/"vesa"/"vboxvideo"/' /etc/X11/xorg.conf > /etc/X11/xorg.conf.sed cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf.sed /etc/X11/xorg.conf echo '#!/bin/sh' >> /etc/rc.local echo '/usr/local/sbin/VBoxService' >> /etc/rc.local chmod a+x /etc/rc.local } loadFonts() { echo loadFonts... cd /usr/ports/x11-fonts/webfonts make install clean pkg_add -r dejavu cd sed ' /Section "Module"/ a\ Load "freetype"\ Load "type1" ' /etc/X11/xorg.conf > /etc/X11/xorg.conf.sed cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf.sed /etc/X11/xorg.conf sed ' /Section "Files"/ a\ FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/webfonts/"\ FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/dejavu/" ' /etc/X11/xorg.conf > /etc/X11/xorg.conf.sed cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf.sed /etc/X11/xorg.conf fc-cache -f -v } loadFlash() { echo loadFlash... kldload linux #cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10 #make install clean pkg_add -r linux_base-f10 echo 'linux_enable="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf echo 'linproc /usr/compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0' >> /etc/fstab mount -a #cd /usr/ports/www/nspluginwrapper #make install clean pkg_add -r nspluginwrapper cd /usr/ports/www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 make makesum make install clean cd mkdir /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins ln -s /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins/ rehash } loadVB() { echo loadVB... pkg_add -r virtualbox-ose echo 'vboxnet_enable="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf echo 'vboxdrv_load="YES"' >> /boot/loader.conf pw groupmod vboxusers -m theuser } loadSvn() { echo loadSvn... pkg_add -r subversion mkdir /home/svn-repo pw user add -n svn -u 3690 -d /home/svn-repo chsh -s /bin/false svn echo 'svnserve_enable="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf echo 'svnserve_data="/home/svn-repo"' >> /etc/rc.conf echo 'svnserve_user="svn"' >> /etc/rc.conf echo 'svnserve_group="svn"' >> /etc/rc.conf rehash svnadmin create /home/svn-repo cd /home/svn-repo/conf echo 'theuser = theuserpw' >> passwd sed ' /# anon-acces/ a\ anon-access = none\ auth-access = write\ password-db = passwd ' svnserve.conf > svnserve.conf.sed cp svnserve.conf.sed svnserve.conf cd chown -R svn:svn /home/svn-repo/ chmod -R 770 /home/svn-repo/* /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start } testy() { echo testy... } loadGnome() { echo loadGnome... pkg_add -r gnome2 pkg_add -r gnome2-fifth-toe pkg_add -r gnome2-hacker-tools pkg_add -r gnome2-office pkg_add -r gnome2-power-tools echo 'proc /proc procfs rw 0 0' >> /etc/fstab echo '#gnome_enable="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf echo '#exec gnome-session' >> /home/theuser/.xinitrc } loadnVidia() { echo loadnVidia... cd /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver make install clean echo 'nvidia_load="YES"' >> /boot/loader.conf sed -e 's/"nv"/"nvidia"/' /etc/X11/xorg.conf > /etc/X11/xorg.conf.sed cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf.sed /etc/X11/xorg.conf cd /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-xconfig make install clean cd /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-settings make install clean } # ======================= itype=xps # enable export to track 8.2-STABLE export PACKAGESITE="ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-8-stable/Latest/" # ======================= if [ $itype = vbox64 ]; then loadPorts loadX11 loadFF loadApps loadFonts loadFlash loadMe loadSvn loadVboxAdds loadSoundVBX #loadGnome fi # ======================= if [ $itype = xps ]; then loadPorts loadX11 loadFF loadApps loadFonts loadFlash loadMe loadSvn loadSoundXPS loadGnome loadVB loadnVidia fi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 07:15:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06358106566B for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 07:15:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from griffin@gnix.co.uk) Received: from think.gnix.co.uk (griffin.gnix.co.uk [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847AA8FC14 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 07:15:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from think.gnix.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by think.gnix.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4V7FRFv060435 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 08:15:27 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from griffin@gnix.co.uk) Received: (from jpg@localhost) by think.gnix.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p4V7FR4d060434 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 08:15:27 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from griffin@gnix.co.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: think.gnix.co.uk: jpg set sender to griffin@gnix.co.uk using -f Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 08:15:27 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110531071527.GA60403@think.gnix.co.uk> References: <20110530152913.GA17861@think.gnix.co.uk> <201105301619.p4UGJo7n011497@fire.js.berklix.net> <20110530163134.GA51087@think.gnix.co.uk> <20110530214056.GA4980@holstein.holy.cow> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110530214056.GA4980@holstein.holy.cow> X-PGP-Key: http://www.gnix.co.uk/~jpg/jpg-pubkey.asc X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE X-URL: http://www.gnix.co.uk/~jpg/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: editors/openoffice.org-3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 07:15:30 -0000 On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:40:56AM -1000, parv wrote: > in message <20110530163134.GA51087@think.gnix.co.uk>, > wrote Jamie Paul Griffin thusly... > > > > I wouldn't mind using one of the packages but they want perl version > > 5.12 and I don't want to use that just for OO. > > Do you have another perl installed such that installing version > 5.12 would cause much churn even if only to be replaced later? well, I upgraded it to 5.14 last week and had quite a few a few issues in the process which took several hours to put right. I'm just going to force install it, if there are problems i'll just have to persevere. jamie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 09:20:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71821065675 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 09:20:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1C28FC18 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 09:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so5128286bwz.13 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 02:20:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=J2UdbJxY+GyU0VkN+fcoGOKJcZ2c7zS/QxiTQkjeqwY=; b=gudfnfg7Xq/r8WCoNLG9hcQuAkpjf1z1SjJg96M2rgjCZ8KpwPtmsH8O0swBxbxhOa wc9/i9cIVja80dTR34hqLE2n+HuMIWEnAunXxE1leOyIPUdyh2Ty35diXugbLODFvQpy U/ZTE7TA7Zr9v8aoWojTYO4tM9Kpnlqudjf8U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jRNDFsHKuUuS1hX5JD+FAezA5OYpgJHtc4AYQxWpoEkJkX8EtwR2jQnr9Y4YrI1QD5 bCXc6yzRi2dsR9JQEWBOQxLVFmoUgW1ANMWlnnhylBEJVZNcDEjEOvYjj8bAi3WvAlPc yHc4JGeiy0dOYdWOXeRoBPP+U8IhEyzH6Yixc= Received: by 10.204.14.144 with SMTP id g16mr5389104bka.34.1306833620158; Tue, 31 May 2011 02:20:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.66.81 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 02:19:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Chris Rees Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 10:19:50 +0100 Message-ID: To: Xn Nooby Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: A small script to customize FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 09:20:22 -0000 On 31 May 2011 04:19, Xn Nooby wrote: > Hello. =A0I wrote a script to install FreeBSD 8.2 on to a real machine, > or a 64-bit Virtualbox VM. =A0It has a modular approach where you can > pick which functions will be run on a different target system. It can > be tweaked easily. =A0I wrote it so that I could do a quick "plain > vanilla install", and then run this script to set up my user, SVN > server, gnome, firefox4, flash, nvidia driver, vbox additons, and > other things. I thought I would post it in case other beginners need > some thing like this to help them configure a machine. =A0I started off > with detailed notes, then thought I might as well script it. When you > run it, the only user interaction is having to enter the user password > twice. =A0Let me know if anyone has any suggestions. How about using $1 instead of theuser? You could always have ${1:-theuser} instead to have a default of theuser, but take the value for username as the first argument. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 13:04:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0483106566C for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 13:04:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E7988FC12 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 13:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so5366218bwz.13 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 06:04:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/YTuJibb+e51MVjszA6SGSHKIvjPRwvN7dpfnubmFwk=; b=szff9Bb0mhxFzBqsi+DZ/bo+Hr8B94tlni+oSTvsMACsQgUJqfhF1/3rx+wPxH3C92 tJpk2wAVw4HOAMgeLvCF4J5PLZISNCLGGniPYCRNOHRsIyJM5izk0QhQSSR2S1zFnXXR EBHcDQjANVOGca7J43OXeNEx6cMGhurbUQxWw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xmVyIrbfhJCY3Dn4FHu6tkzQ9kc+1KLMKDxtMbzlJ36WoCxrOmywqp3RZejh1+zpjt dW498DLhfXIVV79MxI1grwXf1IwFbUKyr+h78Z1Hoa7SSDZOF4o49/DrcEAcgrOIIZOC C+PzZCdTpuG+VRIXpKm9e0fVm1mjVay8UrOdY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.82.224 with SMTP id c32mr486072bkl.161.1306847070124; Tue, 31 May 2011 06:04:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.25.78 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 06:04:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 09:04:30 -0400 Message-ID: From: Xn Nooby To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: A small script to customize FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 13:04:31 -0000 On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > On 31 May 2011 04:19, Xn Nooby wrote: >> Hello. =A0I wrote a script to install FreeBSD 8.2 on to a real machine, >> or a 64-bit Virtualbox VM. =A0It has a modular approach where you can >> pick which functions will be run on a different target system. It can >> be tweaked easily. =A0I wrote it so that I could do a quick "plain >> vanilla install", and then run this script to set up my user, SVN >> server, gnome, firefox4, flash, nvidia driver, vbox additons, and >> other things. I thought I would post it in case other beginners need >> some thing like this to help them configure a machine. =A0I started off >> with detailed notes, then thought I might as well script it. When you >> run it, the only user interaction is having to enter the user password >> twice. =A0Let me know if anyone has any suggestions. > > How about using $1 instead of theuser? > > You could always have ${1:-theuser} instead to have a default of > theuser, but take the value for username as the first argument. > > Chris > That's a good idea. The user was originally called "me", but I wanted something that could be searched and replaced without breaking "gnome" and "home". Using a parameter would be even better, thanks!. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 19:01:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3674C106566C for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:01:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50948FC18 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:01:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so4903985vws.13 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 12:01:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=R/ymXn4NtAawBDskji7FZXWgq6QHCSy634eJXEfU/0k=; b=RamD3MBxxCM7aqNiPoHZnHaRHXq4IK29PJBtzdeC+ezqn8P811FrDPfNW9I80UgrFr Y/sEfe8cXJftdUOlKLGV7Fl/scIfd9AP1e0Ic+IBwXnBaE74L8llBeNCB2YlN8wBsLsE 97aUidOIJmwM2M+ZtfASuOkhAQCtpFbJp7X6M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=jzg31kNbTHC8fr/1QaNvbwAtfM8haDihI17cQOCMTLKkEtUrXG1t8yqrS8CZMtPzD9 byOY9ByiXbG42NECCySSollX85qWUCL/aVsCqHFN54X8t9MpLPYLaOzx5rxtLcXf39dE +HLuZJSgu/30FHuK9KVKMVDAGETG8o5AAtEZ4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.96.195 with SMTP id du3mr804295vdb.276.1306868485876; Tue, 31 May 2011 12:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.184.100 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 12:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 15:01:25 -0400 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: I486_CPU or I586_CPU in kernel config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 19:01:27 -0000 Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 30 May 2011, Adam Vande More wrote: > > > Perhaps this is the one you meant? > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-January/190568.html > > That's the one! Thanks! > > > Actually the two threads touch on the same subject, and it seems > > removal of those options is still desirable on newer CPU's. > > sys/i386/i386/support.s is mentioned, but doesn't seem to have anything > explicitly specific for 586. There are some i686 entries. > > A test for cpu_class==CPUCLASS_586 in /sys/i386/isa/npx.c is mentioned > in the thread, but that check isn't in the current code. Removed: http://svnweb.FreeBSD.org/base?view=revision&revision=209460 There was a discussion about the implications for performance, although I don't remember when it took place, and whether it was on the mailing lists or in a PR audit trail. If you're interested you can track down the details. b. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 23:02:00 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05959106566C for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 23:02:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816288FC12 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 23:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so6037841bwz.13 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:01:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AuRt4yTBUZGWh1WDjlLzdCQu9YizoQ2hgiNThc/Ewk4=; b=Rfbg+xrXrpyRMzgi1Q+Q1h6sDvlJUFvrXfXzhgT/mmFPRWAWcRMFGI1qfiGG+Aepc7 KX2oU8GmQe9q1Rl0hImZQleChuJgaQdjQLTMlDu2kYFiGE3UTNv1vUI3BwU+LUBRL1m/ +5zh8H86r2Pf2V3GDGc/meam/5oStOG4LjlSI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Czj593ADDWEMLxma0fLxFSjlnnvCu5d8HZyrJ1bw4+RGV3aooMSKcrEKpV/UMUTQ7y U9I6sHuFoL1hR6ATdZCpa8Ihn3mpg+srfpti4AiZcU1cegzGUOuwtEj2osqbO97tSWss x8pJtjgOVQ7IFJ5+IK85J4v4240Muw4iF8l4o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.170.193 with SMTP id e1mr5558972bkz.136.1306882918057; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:01:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.176.82 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:01:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 18:01:58 -0500 Message-ID: From: Antonio Olivares To: Xn Nooby Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: A small script to customize FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 23:02:00 -0000 >> You could always have ${1:-theuser} instead to have a default of >> theuser, but take the value for username as the first argument. >> >> Chris >> > > That's a good idea. =A0The user was originally called "me", but I wanted > something that could be searched and replaced without breaking "gnome" > and "home". =A0Using a parameter would be even better, thanks!. > _______________________________________________ For the sound setup: loadSoundVBX() { echo loadsoundVBX... kldload snd_driver cat /dev/sndstat echo 'snd_ich_load=3D"YES"' >> /boot/loader.conf } kldload snd_driver will load the sound driver that it thinks would be the best, but then the driver is changed to ``snd_ich`` in the script. If a user has ``snd_hda``, then the script should output snd_hda and substitute in the loading statement. I see the following code could do the job, but it might need some testing := ( #!/bin/sh # # Detect sound driver for driver in /boot/kernel/snd_*; do driver=3D$(echo ${driver} | sed 's|/boot/kernel/snd_||') if [ ${driver} =3D "driver.ko" ]; then continue; fi kldload snd_${driver} if [ -c /dev/mixer0 ]; then echo "I'm smelling 'snd_${driver}'" echo "snd_${driver}_load=3D\"YES\"" >> /boot/loader.conf exit 0 fi kldunload snd_${driver} done This found in here: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3D22726 The script looks very nice and it could be a valuable asset for the future. Still, there are some things that we(users) need to do by hand and get our hands dirty :) In my case, I could not determine my sound card, I did not get very nice information from cat /dev/sndstat [olivares@tricorehome ~]$ cat /dev/sndstat FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 64bit 2009061500/amd64) Installed devices: pcm0: (play/rec) default pcm1: (play) pcm2: (play) But thanks to list members and their experience, someone suggested to use snd_hda and it worked to perfection :) Regards, Antonio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 02:29:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0343A1065676 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:29:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816728FC14 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 02:29:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so6183157bwz.13 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:29:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Kq9QVRNezDL1iNlbhRdakAY3R0lF/Tav1Vvf3OXc680=; b=ewNgCZRv4dcEFX7P4uSNNnCQUm8K68ymCKuxoaZ4EyCO1muTEIy49GxVrNAfRqTkQD NnuNYMqdxq2AFbS/M7WsXjXU3GQXUGYlR0MG7VTji6MezrBDlB3pMXhkhVrKmAzMRfP0 h9PWywETfo2fEP7O5dAmYDVX+Ro2lq/JWBeH4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=e0xG5fhu7UEnEsCK1HR8Mr1iJM6Y0bXaHDUwCHhZSasVEDugo8+cnnEotjLgUDCZv6 TvVKZp6OpOvJvOu4SS3VoyYzMZG3s/ZjtQZEGCoN8fJoiFZcZrin7BzlthQTcnfR982r P/JIdyg3t7YKWOWqW5f1x7de1bH4anTC0/cOA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.19.5 with SMTP id y5mr3060154bka.194.1306895384136; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:29:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.51.84 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 19:29:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:29:44 -0400 Message-ID: From: Xn Nooby To: Antonio Olivares Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: A small script to customize FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:29:46 -0000 > kldload snd_driver > will load the sound driver that it thinks would be the best, but then I considered using the auto-detect driver, I probably should in a script used by many people. I did not know if there were any disadvantages to using it. > I see the following code could do the job, but it might need some testing :( That is an interesting script - is there an advantage over loading the auto-detect driver? I have trouble knowing which driver to load, even when the system tells what it loaded using the auto-detect driver, lol. > Antonio thanks for the suggestion! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 03:29:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7565F106564A for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 03:29:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexmiroslav@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3774E8FC08 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 03:29:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxl31 with SMTP id 31so3064744yxl.13 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:29:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=JMuFcikmy3/qQcvIDIHcZdLRVYHD1BTZxUKyOJpnNKc=; b=KsdueNq5GLYpkiYQlEJjOl1s29Gx5CH0ZuoowqbmSLYn8g0y0OZ48WTfrHTp8DJRCM KthH7uIldft5iFjLnlvpZM1vKCE+b/I58eCAZQ6jsXmTqMtT0jddQgPHEMxGo4OqzrX0 1nWlIPl1aVRgUs1a08zWgXpJU/qaG9MHhhlJs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Cs29+LcV+tWgPnYQo8bMTYQb2zIPhE+/nbLM3mOUMutPyDrHLeluiKNt/O5ZasvS02 YKMxEYPTuqq5s0wgANv2zMzq8xzZdPw9tSQDukls/AiXwX8pf4AYlQ7vW/28FNesUcU5 yGQb0DsV2mxd1d3l5MLErkRmmamtuz3FU6iGw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.139.197 with SMTP id c45mr1215880yhj.522.1306897219462; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:00:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.63.166 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:00:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 23:00:19 -0400 Message-ID: From: Aleksandr Miroslav To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: src upgrading jails (no ezjail, no "service" jails) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 03:29:17 -0000 I have 4 jails that are running 8.2-RELEASE that I would like to upgrade. The host system, which was also running 8.2-RELEASE, has been successfully upgraded to 8.2-p2. I have /usr/src ready with the new world and new kernel. I did not create the jails using ezjails, so I cannot use that utility to upgrade it. I did not create the jails using the "template" method described in Handbook (section 15.6.1.2), so the method recommended to upgrade them, i.e.: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/jails-application.html#JAILS-SERVICE-JAILS-UPGRADING would not work for me. What is the proper way for me to upgrade these jails? thanks, Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 10:37:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2FC106566B for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:37:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from k0802647@telus.net) Received: from defout.telus.net (defout.telus.net [204.209.205.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 763CD8FC17 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edmwcm02 ([204.209.205.13]) by priv-edmwes23.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.8.01.03.00 201-2260-125-20100507) with ESMTP id <20110601101607.PWIK27452.priv-edmwes23.telusplanet.net@edmwcm02> for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:16:07 -0600 Received: from oliver.bc.lan ([50.92.188.219]) by edmwcm02 with bizsmtp id qaG61g01h4kTNxu01aG7ZS; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 04:16:07 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=7P9dubtIXLU1uTYoeGISe4WxsS6EUAmv3Yv6BAFyrkg= c=1 sm=2 a=PFWxWM63tqYA:10 a=l-LGobScgMQA:10 a=ZOSeop9BJjQA:10 a=LGgl8L9ij00A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=SCo1hh1FAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=i6GbxSaJAAAA:8 a=VaV1ZpDUAAAA:20 a=2VLN4lmkWlN3FsJxSPoA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=KXuLW65_DLEA:10 a=vpciK5hXH9IA:10 a=gA6IeH5FQcgA:10 a=NWVoK91CQyQA:10 X-Telus-Outbound-IP: 50.92.188.219 Received: from [10.111.111.111] (unknown [10.111.111.111]) by oliver.bc.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2DA6472; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 03:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DE61166.2030601@telus.net> Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 03:16:06 -0700 From: Carl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FTP server at freebsd.isc.org is broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:37:38 -0000 During an unattended, non-interactive build of many ports this evening I ran into what I think indicates that the FTP server at freebsd.isc.org is broken. Here is what I believe to be evidence, performed from a FreeBSD 8.2 server at one site: site1# fetch -vvp ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/GD-Arrow-0.01.tar.gz scheme: [ftp] user: [] password: [] host: [ftp.freebsd.org] port: [0] document: [/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/GD-Arrow-0.01.tar.gz] ---> ftp.freebsd.org:21 looking up ftp.freebsd.org connecting to ftp.freebsd.org:21 <<< 220 Welcome to freebsd.isc.org. >>> USER anonymous <<< 331 Please specify the password. >>> PASS agile@rose.agile.lan <<< 500 OOPS: cannot change directory:/home/ftp fetch: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/GD-Arrow-0.01.tar.gz: Syntax error, command unrecognized # echo $FTP_PASSIVE_MODE YES site1# ftp freebsd.isc.org Trying 204.152.184.73... Connected to freebsd.isc.org. 220 Welcome to freebsd.isc.org. Name (freebsd.isc.org:agile): anonymous 331 Please specify the password. Password: 500 OOPS: cannot change directory:/home/ftp ftp: Login failed. ftp> bye 500 OOPS: priv_sock_get_cmd There's no reason that I know of for anything on my end to be referencing /home/ftp. I get this on a Windoze system from a second site (different LAN, different WAN address, same city, same ISP): C:\>ftp freebsd.isc.org Connected to freebsd.isc.org. 220 Welcome to freebsd.isc.org. User (freebsd.isc.org:(none)): anonymous 331 Please specify the password. Password: 500 OOPS: cannot change directory:/home/ftp 500 OOPS: priv_sock_get_cmd Connection closed by remote host. And I found this blog entry dated today in which the author is seeing the same problem: http://salihsblog.blogspot.com/2011/05/freebsd-pkgadd-error-syntax-error.html (http://tinyurl.com/42g7dv5) When problems like this arise, shouldn't the FreeBSD port building mechanisms take advantage of the redundant FreeBSD mirrors to roll over to another working server? I use portmaster for port building and it terminates with this sort of output when this scenario arises: => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/gd-2.0.35.tar.bz2 fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/gd-2.0.35.tar.bz2: Syntax error, command unrecognized => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles// and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/gd. What is the recommended way to enable portmaster to be more resilient against such failures? Carl / K0802647 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 13:12:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FCA6106564A for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:12:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glarkin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.sourcehosting.net (mail1.sourcehosting.net [74.205.51.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6398FC12 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:12:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 68-189-245-235.dhcp.oxfr.ma.charter.com ([68.189.245.235] helo=cube.entropy.prv) by mail1.sourcehosting.net with esmtp (Exim 4.73 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1QRl9q-0006BR-Uj; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 09:08:28 -0400 Received: from v104.entropy.prv (v104.entropy.prv [192.168.1.104]) by cube.entropy.prv (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4DDA4EB1825; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:11:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4DE63A9D.2090509@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 09:11:57 -0400 From: Greg Larkin Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aleksandr Miroslav References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=1C940290 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.189.245.235 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: glarkin@FreeBSD.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail1.sourcehosting.net X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC,SARE_SUB_OBFU_OTHER, TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.sourcehosting.net) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: src upgrading jails (no ezjail, no "service" jails) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: glarkin@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 13:12:05 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 5/31/11 11:00 PM, Aleksandr Miroslav wrote: > I have 4 jails that are running 8.2-RELEASE that I would like to upgrade. > > The host system, which was also running 8.2-RELEASE, has been > successfully upgraded to 8.2-p2. I have /usr/src ready with the new > world and new kernel. > > I did not create the jails using ezjails, so I cannot use that utility > to upgrade it. > > I did not create the jails using the "template" method described in > Handbook (section 15.6.1.2), so the method recommended to upgrade > them, i.e.: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/jails-application.html#JAILS-SERVICE-JAILS-UPGRADING > > would not work for me. > > What is the proper way for me to upgrade these jails? > > thanks, > Alex Hi Alex, You can do this: cd /usr/src make installworld DESTDIR= make distribution DESTDIR= ... ... make installworld DESTDIR= make distribution DESTDIR= Then restart your jails. Regards, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. http://twitter.com/cpucycle/ - Follow you, follow me -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk3mOp0ACgkQ0sRouByUApAvyQCfYDh/dwd5/PB2zElwPuz1NC+D I8kAoJ+tS9UaQqMDHmxophZ8F+dBuMuI =eiBQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 15:31:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8DBE1065672 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:31:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ndhertbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4FA48FC16 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyj12 with SMTP id 12so6919949iyj.13 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 08:31:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=8tOn2zBreOPOoBoaI7TuTT9EgkcJodFk2fAt535/CjA=; b=O0G9mbVwfE3vh89ZosyOtWLhFhXMdXqcYBPb4Ke3jSi7ryrXSeNWAD3MbalNHFjbVs zUNHXcnoNquH/O7j0W9aKCjv4I+6AViYLpe4zOC86JUss7XfgApdNIXBiSeW3ukd5TR4 GBlnNBdlAM44x/NDWilRlJndxl0sa16P9WkyA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=WPC15uR+JuWX8/M04TZZleFaPqlpjpfdlDuAKj8kPFp0msmma3ly0LN2ACsVnDLw8l v67/MG2DTZgylnndYYIX9Gd6DhYMIc3rTwqNhUhgq1XO6fdaG+yejofV2ANK+V8svygi OEc1u2DcUOehM4qdHbt4DIzOImDe9ddGsF41A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.24.193 with SMTP id w1mr9480336ibb.41.1306942274027; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 08:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.208.81 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 08:31:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:31:13 +0200 Message-ID: From: n dhert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: perl5.12 -> perl5.14 upgrade problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:31:15 -0000 I try to upgrade perl5.12 to perl5.14 according to /usr/ports/UPDATING of date 110517 the step " Reinstall everything that depends on Perl ": # portupgrade -fr perl in my case, needs to recompile 318 packages (pkg_info -R perl-5.14.0 | wc -l ) but I get: ... make: don't know how to make /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.0/mach/CORE/cc_runtime.h. Stop causing not to rebuild the following packages Stop in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp Stop in /usr/ports/www/p5-HTML-Parser Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/p5-XML-Parser Stop in /usr/ports/databases/p5-DBI Stop in /usr/ports/devel/p5-IO-Tty Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/p5-Tk Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/p5-GD Stop in /usr/ports/databases/rrdtool Stop in /usr/ports/www/mod_perl2 Stop in /usr/ports/converters/p5-MIME-Base64 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/ImageMagick and checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly causes not to rebuild: Stop in /usr/ports/misc/shared-mime-info Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/polkit Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/policykit and the recompile of another 58 packages were skipped 'because requisite package failed' (one of the above) So it seems to all boil down to that one cause: I DO NOT have a file /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.0/mach/CORE/cc_runtime.h in the /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.0/mach/CORE directory 1. why, what's wrong and how to fix ? 2. when fixed, if I do a # portupgrade -fr perl again, it there some way to avoid recompiling everything that already compiled successfully ? ( so far some 250 packages compiled successfully but this took 10 hours ...) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 18:42:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE7BE106564A for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:42:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B558FC0C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:42:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so108542vws.13 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:42:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=xnh2FOfGzdxtivXgrBGxzTs0B+fuSIaBwwHaOK3sz/E=; b=gSgvwf/KStqqjGQtNTel6gFnhVoG7mqhQpv9bHB414GWRCKvbfuIrNm5x5FiKMnUZS hj196oj//QNzEqqzRfHzvuLWrticbvaGrjr9iEa6IzR3EBjQItuUZO3yN27wvQmnXnOS CoJI8sx9qSS+k1xzlXa49/VIgBJ6h4VDjbIX4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=g1HT7zihO6On8sbTQfAkEVdoxudNqbhGN7mSx9uFGdI22p9zjSE4HoymljyzcjSN8k R2MbRuMSl7Ht52xJFQkKF/KlpMSOQUIF28RC4gKPKSrpprvc6eXHVRc/ywBl0uFIEd7G LEf6npsC1ezmplav4Yq+mSGvvTqVki2EObadw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.98.40 with SMTP id ef8mr2504830vdb.54.1306953760693; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:42:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.184.136 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:42:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:42:40 +0200 Message-ID: From: David Naylor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulators@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.3.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:42:42 -0000 Hi, Packages for wine-fbsd64-1.3.21 have been uploaded to mediafire [1]. nVidia uses should rerun patch-wine-nvidia.sh after updating wine. Regards, David [1] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 18:56:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835A21065676 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:56:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from fsm2.ukr.net (fsm2.ukr.net [195.214.192.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFF98FC14 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:56:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=fsm; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=IweNS+R/NdNCut734PGrT9x+Dl5RHJ6WqsbI3w6+WZI=; b=Mm46vNrVT4DMFZOTo+c22zdjZFBkYMHwudZ9LfdTfviZdVd54Woj1g9S/XZQ+lJZC94msZqMqa7kdE6YG7CYDcc8oYGBD38fK5wWGU2vdDjHhv2hgw+gcU68aiyEOyYGhnUeesGY1xgoVESAFyLa0Foau3PNvNQiEUK0VHIV4n0=; Received: from [46.185.0.73] (helo=localhost) by fsm2.ukr.net with esmtps ID 1QRqb8-000KyT-2w ; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:56:54 +0300 Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 21:56:52 +0300 From: Ivan Klymenko To: David Naylor Message-ID: <20110601215652.3eaca2b4@ukr.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulators@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.3.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:56:56 -0000 =D0=92 Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:42:40 +0200 David Naylor =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > Hi, >=20 > Packages for wine-fbsd64-1.3.21 have been uploaded to mediafire [1]. >=20 > nVidia uses should rerun patch-wine-nvidia.sh after updating wine. >=20 > Regards, >=20 > David >=20 > [1] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 19:36:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C3E1065673 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:36:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexmiroslav@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886068FC19 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so87705gxk.13 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:36:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=gCFVOSc+BnQXSVSuFZPOOF4lX2Hgc45tNa8rswVEEY8=; b=ZK2mn7KK6yFdnhemIiEMcqOvO4rMbeJlbKJXw8L+W236HsDiM6JfgfyCl0Wa2uohht HwkNCrCPuyxOVRyoA7PZOMpD3V8s9XdxA2Kk+9qHnEvxaZ63j+w/CdunTWrgRagXfHK6 aTBDkeXXu6IyJayyw1S1WoW0TmQUfaQcwFA5M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=COwWZbfnsMRQTfYlEwlLsHM9sMecY8ta/o1Io58BGxW8SRB3Et3NwZNXFB9w9yXhAx mRzWWYhSkqm7mgbuQ0r93CaSIm1EOQjDAiDEdS0Andt3KC7m7uqpPJAod7kMoINtXTTj WKDOYZhVo6iaAIJPpuVBvUCVwljKzUWLcyyI0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.189.2 with SMTP id b2mr9378478yhn.388.1306956969713; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:36:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.63.166 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 12:36:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DE63A9D.2090509@FreeBSD.org> References: <4DE63A9D.2090509@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:36:09 -0400 Message-ID: From: Aleksandr Miroslav To: glarkin@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: src upgrading jails (no ezjail, no "service" jails) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:36:11 -0000 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Greg Larkin wrote: > > I have 4 jails that are running 8.2-RELEASE that I would like to > > upgrade. > > > > I did not create the jails using ezjails > > I did not create the jails using the "template" method > > You can do this: > cd /usr/src > make installworld DESTDIR= > make distribution DESTDIR= Would this not overwrite the data I already had in the existing jails? Also, presumably, I would have to run mergemaster in jail after doing this, correct? Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 20:44:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 459BC106564A for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:44:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glarkin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.sourcehosting.net (mail1.sourcehosting.net [74.205.51.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196CF8FC13 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 68-189-245-235.dhcp.oxfr.ma.charter.com ([68.189.245.235] helo=cube.entropy.prv) by mail1.sourcehosting.net with esmtp (Exim 4.73 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1QRsDq-0009Bu-9u; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:41:02 -0400 Received: from v104.entropy.prv (v104.entropy.prv [192.168.1.104]) by cube.entropy.prv (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACBB4EB4822; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 16:44:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4DE6A4B1.70105@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:44:33 -0400 From: Greg Larkin Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aleksandr Miroslav References: <4DE63A9D.2090509@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=1C940290 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.189.245.235 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: glarkin@FreeBSD.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail1.sourcehosting.net X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC,SARE_SUB_OBFU_OTHER, TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.sourcehosting.net) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: src upgrading jails (no ezjail, no "service" jails) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: glarkin@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:44:40 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 6/1/11 3:36 PM, Aleksandr Miroslav wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Greg Larkin wrote: >>> I have 4 jails that are running 8.2-RELEASE that I would like to >>> upgrade. >>> >>> I did not create the jails using ezjails >>> I did not create the jails using the "template" method >> >> You can do this: >> cd /usr/src >> make installworld DESTDIR= >> make distribution DESTDIR= > > Would this not overwrite the data I already had in the existing jails? > > Also, presumably, I would have to run mergemaster in jail after doing > this, correct? > > Alex Hi Alex, Those commands will update the base system in the jail directory "jaildir1" with the latest bits that were previously compiled with "make buildworld". I don't believe they will disturb any other data in /usr/local, if that's what you are concerned about. Yes, you will also need to run mergemaster - I forgot about that step. You can run it outside of the jail in question if you use the "-D" option. I use ezjail here, and it will automate a lot of these steps for you. Is there a reason that you can't use it? Regards, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. http://twitter.com/cpucycle/ - Follow you, follow me -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk3mpLEACgkQ0sRouByUApDi/gCeJ7Bdcs+R3bzKqL029M3nIZFV 1psAoKcSsfvhC+ydizhfH35G2gz8nOZA =cg9H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 20:46:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4781065673 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:46:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6238FC0C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:46:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p51KkM6W019557; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:46:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p51KkMmv019554; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:46:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:46:22 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Adam Vande More In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:46:22 -0600 (MDT) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I486_CPU or I586_CPU in kernel config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:46:23 -0000 On Mon, 30 May 2011, Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 30 May 2011, Adam Vande More wrote: > >> Perhaps this is the one you meant? >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-January/190568.html > > That's the one! Thanks! > >> Actually the two threads touch on the same subject, and it seems removal of >> those options is still desirable on newer CPU's. > > sys/i386/i386/support.s is mentioned, but doesn't seem to have anything > explicitly specific for 586. There are some i686 entries. > > A test for cpu_class==CPUCLASS_586 in /sys/i386/isa/npx.c is mentioned in the > thread, but that check isn't in the current code. A little empirical testing: Times for buildworld after a fresh reboot, /usr/obj/usr deleted, GENERIC included, running ccache: default (486/586 included) 9:05.84 nocpu I486, nocpu I586_CPU 9.27.88 nocpu I486_CPU 8.53.86 So maybe a 6% increase by removing 486 but leaving 586... These were not rigorous benchmarks, it might just be measurement noise. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 23:00:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA01106564A for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:00:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Received: from mail2.nber.org (mail2.nber.org [66.251.72.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF608FC08 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nber6.nber.org (nber6.nber.org [66.251.72.76]) by mail2.nber.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p51MXCZ7000408; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:33:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Received: from localhost (feenberg@localhost) by nber6.nber.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p51MQVi1000738; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:26:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: nber6.nber.org: feenberg owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:26:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Feenberg X-X-Sender: feenberg@nber6 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Linux Mail Server 5.6.39/RELEASE, bases: 20110601 #5434008, check: 20110601 clean Cc: Mohan Ramanujan Subject: Can FreeBSD 8.2 install on an EFI motherboard? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:00:34 -0000 I have an ASUS P8P67 motherboard, and the install programs in 8.1 and 8.2 are unable to write files to the disks, so the install fails after choosing the what to install. Partitioning and newfs went fine, however. Could this be because the ASUS MB uses EFI instead of a BIOS? (It does). I have installed a score of different FreeBSD systems on a score of different motherboards, and never had a compatibility issue, but I have found some posts saying that special procedures are required to install on an EFI motherboard. They were sufficiently complex that I would probably just get another motherboard. Daniel Feenberg feenberg@nber.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 00:22:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687291065675 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:22:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mnorwick@centurytel.net) Received: from mail940c35.nsolutionszone.com (mail940c35.nsolutionszone.com [209.235.152.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1820C8FC16 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:22:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Authenticated-User: mnorwick.centurytel.net Received: from [192.168.1.45] (174-124-44-91.dyn.centurytel.net [174.124.44.91] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail940c35.nsolutionszone.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p520Mo7h026655 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:22:52 GMT Message-ID: <4DE6D7DA.7010304@centurytel.net> Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:22:50 -0500 From: "Michael D. Norwick" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=1.1 cv=4JSZwFbTLKO36TlkcVUHJUs4fiAFncqPKy8bWJ9Udmc= c=1 sm=1 a=NA7G0gPBIugA:10 a=wkrYFMhVKOEA:10 a=3WPTVEtZbjMA:10 a=b_L0_URf4zIA:10 a=FRf1OoTDWRHtxozzwt0xeQ==:17 a=9I5xiGouAAAA:8 a=TSbVqHtbAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=SNLoE5IOAAAA:8 a=ouwCTJWdD9GOIIdIj7QA:9 a=VKKV_X6-ETHJKGUuQb0A:7 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=qcCZaJiyPlYA:10 a=gWmOFBW1Y4AA:10 a=V909qaoyyQFbx8ldQNIA:9 a=4ZYltol2vojWxCYKUEIA:7 a=FRf1OoTDWRHtxozzwt0xeQ==:117 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Build failure /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3 on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:22:54 -0000 Good Day; It appears that I cannot build openoffice.org-3 from ports due to an error similar to this; http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/OpenOffice-3-2-fails-to-build-on-FreeBSD-8-0-STABLE-amd64-td3873768.html 1 module(s): nss need(s) *to* be rebuilt Reason(s): ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /usr/*ports*/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/nss/ Attention: if you *build* and deliver *the* above module(s) you may prolongue your *the* *build* issuing command "*build* --*from* nss" and ... http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel.openoffice/2805 1 module(s): instsetoo_native need(s) to be rebuilt Reason(s): ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work /OOO330_m20/instsetoo_native/util Attention: if you fix the errors in above module(s) you may prolongue your the build issuing command: build --from instsetoo_native ***** Error code 1 I am sorry that I cannot give you the exact error message because I did 'make clean' in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3 during my troubleshooting. Google produced the above hits and they are the same type of module build error I am seeing. My build error is in module moz. #uname -a 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD #0 r21908M: Wed Mar 2 08:29:52 CET 2011 root@www4:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 The kernel, system and userland are from binaries downloaded from ftp.freebsd.org on 05/29/2011. portsnap fetch/extract on 05/30/2011. I have made no adjustments to /etc/make.conf. Reading /usr/ports/UPDATING back to 20100617 yields no clues. I am downloading the package from http://files.bsdroot.lv/my/FreeBSD/office-amd64/ right now. I would like to know if something is amiss with dependencies on amd64. Or, should I just forget building from source for now? Thank You, Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 00:44:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94A71065674 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:44:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david+dated+1307406265.598e7c@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F148FC17 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:44:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p520OPns077379 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:24:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from david+dated+1307406265.598e7c@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.13.8/8.14.1/Submit) id p520OPaD077363 for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:24:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from david+dated+1307406265.598e7c@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1307406265.598e7c@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:24:25 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:24:24 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110602002424.GA76622@skytracker.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) From: David Banning Cc: Subject: installing rpm wavemaker X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:44:05 -0000 I have installed wavemaker but while attempting to run wavemaker it is asking for libjli.so It appears that library may be installed from the port java - I'm wondering if this bsd native port can be used or if I must install a Linux version of java. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 00:51:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C4F106564A for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:51:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4CA8FC16 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:51:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-63-204.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.63.204]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0651D922; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 02:51:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id p520pXB9004139; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 02:51:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 02:51:32 +0200 From: Polytropon To: David Banning Message-Id: <20110602025132.567bf17f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20110602002424.GA76622@skytracker.ca> References: <20110602002424.GA76622@skytracker.ca> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: installing rpm wavemaker X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:51:36 -0000 On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 20:24:24 -0400, David Banning wrote: > I have installed wavemaker but while attempting to run wavemaker it is > asking for libjli.so > > It appears that library may be installed from the port java - I'm wondering > if this bsd native port can be used or if I must install a Linux version > of java. As the program itself requires the Linux ABI, I would assume that the jli library does the same. The request for libjli.so seems to refer to a Linux library, so you will need to install some Linux-Java in order to get that working. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 02:08:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FC3106566B for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 02:08:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F58C8FC17 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 02:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so628347fxm.13 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:08:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zbhOjAtfKHWhIRJvrxIFzGIeH0un5ZeLMHMa1bxy0v0=; b=QVVvrmB8DK/3aTv+fDTFvoYIN1nw4LlrZnOfeUsM5yxaNhS2nHQ7sazBttZNT3JoCJ rDr7UoEXk2ivlA9kP6Q+iCChp8K5k7wkAm+bHrbgZ3uoOUQjXUZ8hvamZuxAIs7JIrT/ Lg+j8Ye9OW2HlYICAeXN2xQhPggPsQuO9SS0M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=By1mQnMn/9p2LN7NsRkiyd0ZC5Aan3mEYhn1qANkhZU7gc9PSDohpoDKsAze1+B5bK 7kLqMDW0LaUwhiC4s55OibUlxsHOyU1DW7SCoYKYpql1R8bb1nDRRlGb3LL05WoZpO1q HDDThX48sTjF7oirag+wK2w8LWZqWGJIEBvmY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.21.215 with SMTP id k23mr169682fab.88.1306980517326; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:08:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.107.67 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:08:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 21:08:37 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I486_CPU or I586_CPU in kernel config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 02:08:39 -0000 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Warren Block wrote: > A little empirical testing: > > Times for buildworld after a fresh reboot, /usr/obj/usr deleted, GENERIC > included, running ccache: > > default (486/586 included) 9:05.84 > nocpu I486, nocpu I586_CPU 9.27.88 > nocpu I486_CPU 8.53.86 > > So maybe a 6% increase by removing 486 but leaving 586... These were not > rigorous benchmarks, it might just be measurement noise. > Good to know, thanks. 6% is nothing to sneeze at. I've already updated my nanobsd builds. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 05:14:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24C7106566B for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 05:14:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aussieang@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675E18FC0C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 05:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxc34 with SMTP id 34so545374vxc.13 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 22:14:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=UQclm21fFAhZKZa3jNOx7VEAWe4sLk3FAiPcNBFVRvM=; b=WQEuruHPX38tIYaXRhAlNAEKqleHNOdy7c1RTFF6NU9XB3pIJ3QK3C9vuRKBm+PeUW g5oe0vpWRZOyQjadZ5zNy9na6Q2o25QgYD0soBKrJymn1m3UasCIPA9GykAG9amB8Dx5 P0AJuNAn/P2W09VORPtImRPCWOSMNE9Imw4BE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Rt8wyjxtPQq10yBq751qVb9afSliBZQGELs1E6WChfnUOF0+VBBSl7/72dNmcV/f5a w5dCw4Z3mRK0wz+uaiy/cDfraPnJb6nVm67x5yhuYV1NWsaP6bHh/v0BfBySWYZoLpTG VsKc5QbbqjB1z2tkIbbR2vwSsgG3UpiBuVO2g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.68.147 with SMTP id w19mr382689vdt.152.1306991638139; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 22:13:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.185.225 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:13:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:13:58 -0700 Message-ID: From: Angelo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Install ImageMagick configured with Autotrace switch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 05:14:02 -0000 Thanks Peter but I can't seem to build this thing. I've tried just about everything I can think of to pass the argument "--with-autotrace" and it throws exceptions or just ignores the command. The output of the configure in ImageMagick's delegate configuration is --with-autotrace=no and I'm trying to change it to =yes before I build. When I run "make configure --with-autotrace=yes" ("./configure" won't work) or any other combination, the build is without the option set to yes just the default no. When I add the argument to the make file directly, it stops at "/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lMagickWand" Also, make doesn't recognize "-- -" and throws exceptions there too when I enclose it with ' '. When I install autotrace first, it automatically installs ImageMagick as well but the delegate config in ImageMagick is still set to no. Last but not least (this may be tied to the problem or add clues) when I install ImageMagick and test (passes all internal tests), the system won't recognize any shell commands like "convert" but will in a php script via IMagick which still doesn't produce the correct svg xml since autotrace isn't being used for the vectorization conversion. Would be nice to run php scripting with ImageMagick commands from the shell but at this point I'll take just about anything. Cheers! Angelo ______________________ A> I am trying to install ImageMagick and Autotrace ports but I need to A> configure Imagemagick to work with Autotrace so it processes raster images A> to the vector svg format properly. A> A> This is what is recommended from the imagemagick website to do, but I don't A> know the commands to type in freebsd to accomplish: Quote: "For this to work A> however the 'development' "AutoTrace" library must be installed, and IM A> configured with a "--with-autotrace" switch. You'd better tweak the graphics/ImageMagick port for this. Its Makefile should have the 'CONFIGURE_ARGS =+' -like strings you can use as a sample for the WITH_* option you can easily add. Be sure to include the DEPENDS variable update for your library, too. Feel free to submit patch for that port then. The dependence library port should be already present on the ports tree, too. A> So do I install with "make --with-autotrace" then "make A> install --with-autotrace" and lastly "make clean"? This is about ImageMagick's ./configure I think. A> I already have ImageMagick and Autotrace installed but not configured A> together so I'm assuming I will have to uninstall imagemagick first then A> reinstall it with the autotrace switch? uninstall and compile anew, 'make clean' is the best to ensure this before 'make'. 73! Peter pgp: A0E26627 (4A42 6841 2871 5EA7 52AB 12F8 0CE1 4AAC A0E2 6627) -- http://vereshagin.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 10:18:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43535106564A for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:18:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from notification+F34709933@netlogmail.com) Received: from mx05-2.netlogmail.com (mx05-2.netlogmail.com [193.164.158.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B9308FC13 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:18:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=netlogmail.com; s=netlog; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=netlogmail.com; t=1307009113; h=From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=GvzlfyiT2GassUr3o1qMri9nAeI=; b=t01tXrMj98wnmXltkjJ9lv6WfGryRg2ofH54fO4ypZujllIjQhD/ehiybv63V7Rh SE+GeeIMS4xCAxqdw4qRlL26fuotwJM9gJ6Eu57davkB8756aoUYsYZme5j71kuQ fusTDjK6dbu67t+ikDKJyJU985BabAsaWv/z1CmdvRs=; DomainKey-Signature: q=dns; a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=netlog; d=netlogmail.com; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:Sender:Subject:Date:X-MM-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=efKCPExMqyGnBv7FltGv2Hkp5N0xchP898toIZrTo5gtAYbcDpMqBGxLmA2cNbRt mWXttEaaP0zjmVB0N9yPQY0P4tWAMD6RrwATYBG+q5CLig/tB1RiJeqMgJWNYNgT CpZSThAdX4aXYBOeX/+cruzajzQ/qBoA2TOz4+YzDFg= Received: from [192.168.10.5] ([192.168.10.5:56667] helo=web) by mx19.netlogmail.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.0.26.37820 r(37820)) with ESMTP id C1/8A-21270-95067ED4; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:05:13 +0200 Message-ID: From: Netlog To: shashatielias Sender: notification+F34709933@netlogmail.com Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:18:49 +0000 X-MM-ID: -3aWQ9RjM0NzA5OTMzLHR5cGU9MSxkaXN0cm89ZW4sZGlzdHJvaWQ9MTgyOTg3NjQ2NSxkYXRlPTEzMDcwMDk5Mjksc3VidHlwZT0wLHZlcnNpb249Nyxjdj12Ni4wMCx1aWQ9MTU3MzYwOTQxLG1pZD0w MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Netlog update: lyjeanewr wants to be your friend X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:18:52 -0000 Hi Elias, You receive this mail because you're a Netlog member. Your Netlog account: http://en.netlog.com/shashatielias 1 Netlog member wants to be your friend. http://en.netlog.com/go/friends/requests Status -- You don't have a profile picture yet. Add a profile picture: http://en.netlog.com/go/manage/photos/view=add Upload a picture: http://en.netlog.com/go/manage/photos/view=add Write a blog message: http://en.netlog.com/go/manage/blog/view=add Shout @ your friends: http://en.netlog.com/shashatielias/shouts/view=withfriends&add=1 Top brands -- adidas: http://en.netlog.com/adidas sonyericsson: http://en.netlog.com/sonyericsson Pendulum: http://en.netlog.com/Pendulum puma: http://en.netlog.com/puma Predictor: http://en.netlog.com/Predictor Popular videos -- 2201 http://en.netlog.com/go/explore/videos/videoid=en-4220335 Viewed 28 274 times Enrique Iglesias - Ring my bells on Netlog http://en.netlog.com/go/explore/videos/videoid=en-1484152 Viewed 23 467 times 2103 http://en.netlog.com/go/explore/videos/videoid=en-4342676 Viewed 21 526 times 1905 http://en.netlog.com/go/explore/videos/videoid=en-4342652 Viewed 17 065 times the Netlog Team ---------------------------------------------------------------- You receive this mail because you're a Netlog member. Your Netlog account: http://en.netlog.com/shashatielias You no longer want to receive these updates by e-mail? Edit your Settings: http://en.netlog.com/go/settings/email ---------------------------------------------------------------- Netlog NV/SA. E. Braunplein 18. B-9000 Gent. Belgium BE0859635972. abuse-en@netlog.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 10:58:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D21106564A for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:58:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F688FC0A for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:58:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so442373gxk.13 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 03:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.191.200 with SMTP id g48mr648137yhn.437.1307012285862; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 03:58:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (twdp-174-109-142-001.nc.res.rr.com [174.109.142.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k10sm305726yhj.64.2011.06.02.03.58.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 02 Jun 2011 03:58:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3QlQWY1JJpz2CG44 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:58:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 06:58:00 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20110602065800.4a6b220d@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4DE6D7DA.7010304@centurytel.net> References: <4DE6D7DA.7010304@centurytel.net> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Build failure /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3 on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:58:08 -0000 On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:22:50 -0500 Michael D. Norwick articulated: > Good Day; > > It appears that I cannot build openoffice.org-3 from ports due to an > error similar to > this; > > http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/OpenOffice-3-2-fails-to-build-on-FreeBSD-8-0-STABLE-amd64-td3873768.html > > 1 module(s): > nss > need(s) *to* be rebuilt > > Reason(s): > > ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making > /usr/*ports*/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/nss/ > > Attention: if you *build* and deliver *the* above module(s) you may > prolongue your *the* *build* issuing command "*build* --*from* nss" > > and ... > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel.openoffice/2805 > > 1 module(s): > instsetoo_native > need(s) to be rebuilt > > Reason(s): > > ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making > /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work > /OOO330_m20/instsetoo_native/util > > Attention: if you fix the errors in above module(s) you may prolongue > your the build issuing command: > > build --from instsetoo_native > > ***** Error code 1 > > I am sorry that I cannot give you the exact error message because I > did 'make clean' in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3 during my > troubleshooting. Google produced the above hits and they are the > same type of module build error I am seeing. > My build error is in module moz. > > #uname -a > 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD #0 r21908M: Wed Mar 2 08:29:52 CET 2011 > root@www4:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > The kernel, system and userland are from binaries downloaded from > ftp.freebsd.org on 05/29/2011. portsnap fetch/extract on 05/30/2011. > > I have made no adjustments to /etc/make.conf. Reading > /usr/ports/UPDATING back to 20100617 yields no clues. > > I am downloading the package from > http://files.bsdroot.lv/my/FreeBSD/office-amd64/ right now. I would > like to know if something is amiss with dependencies on amd64. Or, > should I just forget building from source for now? Maybe it is time to consider using a different product. From, Oracle proposes OpenOffice.org to Apache Incubator. OO was never more than a poor clone of MS Office 97 anyway. LibreOffice is a possibility. Arguably the biggest additions to Microsoft Office in recent years have been OneNote, the fantastically useful note taking application, and SharePoint Workspace which allows collaborative working. Sadly, there's just nothing like either in LibreOffice 3.3. It's a release that would have been stunning in 2000, but is now slightly anachronistic and dull. However; depending on your individual needs, it might just fit the bill for you. Plus, it is in the ports system: Port: libreoffice-3.3.2 Path: /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice Info: Full integrated office productivity suite -- Jerry ✌ jerry+fbsd@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or ignored. Do not CC this poster. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 10:58:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8567106566B for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:58:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miklosovic.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867548FC13 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:58:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so442715gxk.13 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 03:58:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=hUevHRHgYouxynBSvDUQtNBDbfZvIq5pFMhM+5qXuCA=; b=J3XlvEgx1/o5hTAt079ixX3SzrYMZuvURNb+okpeT2wnQ4nNNBMm6eXeh/RF0tUu4q Ar/912AOHJMPXxo6TL8JU1+tNgeszxhGUL2XSMVsT0mI2xygQ5yRZTVSogSZ784x7BhC CZVpODcY9LdoPsV87PUBy+CoXgm23Y1xJMODA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=WkjnIskPag1+0+ak3nbd9CW2BaWtQRBCwwj6HE7m9u92wV3Vwpfm68VtPUqHK2O7f5 wCoatSkf3cneUFHZP+py4oQvNdXjwDqffI8sxBGeXeWC2DiRAb4hnWUsrIukj1agVyWo j/RP+ez0KLPqUnNiqdNigr9DpmKH+m2s38+rQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.79.226 with SMTP id i62mr615851yhe.282.1307010724950; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 03:32:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.34.198 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 03:32:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:32:04 +0200 Message-ID: From: Stefan Miklosovic To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: custom iso with /etc/src.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:58:57 -0000 Hi all, I know I can build custom iso with make release but this is my question: In order to get some custom build, e.g. for jails, I used to write some things to /etc/src.conf for not installing / compiling some software (games, daemons etc), so my jail is really thin. But now, I would REALLY love to make this jail system as default bsd system which I can install to pc from installer, which would be at iso. Well, this would not be just like jail, there would be kernel as well and so on ... >From what I know, there are several stages in make release, from release(7) I see that release: Uses ``make installworld'' to install a clean system into a chroot(8) environment on the file system. Checks out the specified version of the source code and then rebuilds the entire system in the clean environment with ``make buildworld''. The detailed steps that follow are then executed to package up the different distributions, build the installation floppy disks, build release documenta- tion, and so on. I have cvs repository localy installed in /home/ncvs. But, if I compile it (/usr/src with /etc/src.conf) and than make release, it will fail because even I install it, it fails to buildworld in make release stage, because I have not make + compiler toolchain and other things in that "clean system" after installworld. So my question is, how to make it in that way, that I "make release", full system is installed to chroot and than system suitable for my needs (/etc/src.conf options what to compile and what not) is build and isos are made. Thank you very much Stefan Miklosovic From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 11:44:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76A4106564A for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:44:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from griffin@gnix.co.uk) Received: from think.gnix.co.uk (griffin.gnix.co.uk [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5648C8FC0C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from think.gnix.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by think.gnix.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p52BioNC018823 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:44:50 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from griffin@gnix.co.uk) Received: (from jpg@localhost) by think.gnix.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p52Bio30018822 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:44:50 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from griffin@gnix.co.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: think.gnix.co.uk: jpg set sender to griffin@gnix.co.uk using -f Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:44:50 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110602114449.GA18797@think.gnix.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP-Key: http://www.gnix.co.uk/~jpg/jpg-pubkey.asc X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE X-URL: http://www.gnix.co.uk/~jpg/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: acroread9 - kernel module load error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:44:52 -0000 Hello Installed this port but the kernel won't load and produces the following error: think# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/linux_adobe start kldload: can't load /usr/local/libexec/linux_adobe/linux_adobe.ko: Exec format error /usr/local/etc/rc.d/linux_adobe: WARNING: Unable to load kernel module /usr/local/libexec/linux_adobe/linux_adobe.ko Has anyone else experienced this? Does anyone have any suggestions to fix it? best wishes jamie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 12:16:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892661065679 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:16:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from cp-out7.libero.it (cp-out7.libero.it [212.52.84.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F308FC19 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:16:11 +0000 (UTC) X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0204.4DE77F0A.0013,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-libjamoibt: 1555 Received: from soth.ventu (151.41.174.43) by cp-out7.libero.it (8.5.133) id 4DD240550270ED27 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:16:09 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p52CG1p0094864 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:16:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4DE77F01.1050900@netfence.it> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:16:01 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; it-IT; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110429 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.1.2.13 Subject: Critical issues with WD green drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:16:12 -0000 Hello. In a server of mine (7.3p4/i386) I replaced a 1TB Hitachi SATA drive (which worked perfectly), with two brand new Western Digital 2TB disks. Now I'm having critical problems, ranging from the disks getting stuck, to the box rebooting. Those are not the main disks in the box, so they are currently unmounted; I wasn't even able to run newfs on them, since every process that tries to use these disk will hang after a while (and can't be killed either). The box is based on an Intel S5000 motherboard and the drives are attached on the MB in an hot-swap enclosure. First, what I think might be the relevant part of dmesg: > FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE-p4 #1: Wed Dec 15 11:53:13 CET 2010 > root@xxxxx.xxxxxxxx.xx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/XXXXX i386 > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz (2004.99-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x10676 Stepping = 6 > Features=0xbfebfbff > Features2=0xce33d > AMD Features=0x20100000 > AMD Features2=0x1 > Cores per package: 4 > real memory = 2143289344 (2044 MB) > avail memory = 2090176512 (1993 MB) > ACPI APIC Table: > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs > ... > acpi0: on motherboard > acpi0: [ITHREAD] > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed > Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 > acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x408-0x40b on acpi0 > acpi_hpet0: iomem 0xfed00000-0xfed003ff on acpi0 > Timecounter "HPET" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 900 > acpi_button0: on acpi0 > acpi_button1: on acpi0 > pcib0: port 0xca2,0xca3,0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 > pci0: on pcib0 > pcib1: at device 2.0 on pci0 > pci1: on pcib1 > pcib2: irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 > pci2: on pcib2 > pcib3: irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2 > pci3: on pcib3 > pcib4: at device 0.0 on pci3 > pci4: on pcib4 > ... > pcib5: at device 0.2 on pci3 > pci5: on pcib5 > pcib6: irq 18 at device 2.0 on pci2 > pci6: on pcib6 > ... > pcib7: at device 0.3 on pci1 > pci7: on pcib7 > ... > pcib8: at device 3.0 on pci0 > pci8: on pcib8 > pcib9: at device 4.0 on pci0 > pci9: on pcib9 > pcib10: at device 5.0 on pci0 > pci10: on pcib10 > pcib11: at device 6.0 on pci0 > pci11: on pcib11 > pcib12: at device 7.0 on pci0 > pci12: on pcib12 > pci0: at device 8.0 (no driver attached) > pcib13: irq 16 at device 28.0 on pci0 > pci13: on pcib13 > ... > pcib14: at device 30.0 on pci0 > pci14: on pcib14 > ... > atapci1: port 0x40d8-0x40df,0x40f4-0x40f7,0x40d0-0x40d7,0x40f0-0x40f3,0x4020-0x403f mem 0xb9000000-0xb90003ff irq 20 at device 31.2 on pci0 > atapci1: [ITHREAD] > atapci1: AHCI called from vendor specific driver > atapci1: AHCI Version 01.10 controller with 6 ports detected > ata2: on atapci1 > ata2: [ITHREAD] > ata3: on atapci1 > ata3: [ITHREAD] > ata4: on atapci1 > ata4: [ITHREAD] > ata5: on atapci1 > ata5: [ITHREAD] > ata6: on atapci1 > ata6: [ITHREAD] > ata7: on atapci1 > ata7: [ITHREAD] > ... > ad4: 1907729MB at ata2-master SATA300 > ad8: 1907729MB at ata4-master SATA300 > ... > GEOM_STRIPE: Device backup created (id=912470894). > GEOM_STRIPE: Disk ad4 attached to backup. > GEOM_STRIPE: Disk ad8 attached to backup. > GEOM_STRIPE: Device backup activated. > ... Following are some samples of the messages I get in the logs: > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SMART taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad8: WARNING - SMART taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad8: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad8: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad8: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SET_MULTI taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: FAILURE - SMART timed out > ad8: WARNING - SMART freeing taskqueue zombie request > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad8: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SET_MULTI taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad8: WARNING - SET_MULTI taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad8: FAILURE - SMART timed out > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad8: WARNING - ATA_IDENTIFY taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SET_MULTI taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: FAILURE - SET_MULTI timed out > ad8: WARNING - ATA_IDENTIFY freeing taskqueue zombie request > ad8: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SET_MULTI taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE requeued due to channel reset > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE requeued due to channel reset > ad8: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad8: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad8: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SMART taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad8: WARNING - SET_MULTI taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad8: FAILURE - ATA_IDENTIFY timed out LBA=0 > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad8: WARNING - ATAPI_IDENTIFY taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SET_MULTI taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: FAILURE - SMART timed out > ad8: WARNING - ATAPI_IDENTIFY freeing taskqueue zombie request > ad8: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad8: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SET_MULTI taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad8: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad8: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad4: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly smartctl -a gives: > smartctl 5.40 2010-10-16 r3189 [FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE-p4 i386] (local build) > Copyright (C) 2002-10 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net > > === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === > Model Family: Western Digital Caviar Green (Adv. Format) family > Device Model: WDC WD20EARS-00MVWB0 > Serial Number: WD-WMAZA4718261 > Firmware Version: 51.0AB51 > User Capacity: 2,000,398,934,016 bytes > Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show] > ATA Version is: 8 > ATA Standard is: Exact ATA specification draft version not indicated > Local Time is: Thu Jun 2 14:08:08 2011 CEST > SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability. > SMART support is: Enabled > > === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === > SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED > > General SMART Values: > Offline data collection status: (0x82) Offline data collection activity > was completed without error. > Auto Offline Data Collection: Enabled. > Self-test execution status: ( 41) The self-test routine was interrupted > by the host with a hard or soft reset. > Total time to complete Offline > data collection: (38580) seconds. > Offline data collection > capabilities: (0x7b) SMART execute Offline immediate. > Auto Offline data collection on/off support. > Suspend Offline collection upon new > command. > Offline surface scan supported. > Self-test supported. > Conveyance Self-test supported. > Selective Self-test supported. > SMART capabilities: (0x0003) Saves SMART data before entering > power-saving mode. > Supports SMART auto save timer. > Error logging capability: (0x01) Error logging supported. > General Purpose Logging supported. > Short self-test routine > recommended polling time: ( 2) minutes. > Extended self-test routine > recommended polling time: ( 255) minutes. > Conveyance self-test routine > recommended polling time: ( 5) minutes. > SCT capabilities: (0x3035) SCT Status supported. > SCT Feature Control supported. > SCT Data Table supported. > > SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16 > Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: > ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE > 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x002f 100 253 051 Pre-fail Always - 0 > 3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0027 253 253 021 Pre-fail Always - 1058 > 4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 9 > 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 200 140 Pre-fail Always - 0 > 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x002e 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 > 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 22 > 10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0032 100 253 000 Old_age Always - 0 > 11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x0032 100 253 000 Old_age Always - 0 > 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 8 > 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 7 > 193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 67 > 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 118 114 000 Old_age Always - 32 > 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 > 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 > 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0030 200 200 000 Old_age Offline - 0 > 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 > 200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x0008 200 200 000 Old_age Offline - 11 > > SMART Error Log Version: 1 > No Errors Logged > > SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1 > Num Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error > # 1 Extended captive Interrupted (host reset) 90% 21 - > # 2 Extended captive Interrupted (host reset) 90% 21 - > # 3 Conveyance captive Completed without error 00% 20 - > # 4 Short captive Completed without error 00% 20 - > # 5 Short captive Interrupted (host reset) 90% 1 - > > SMART Selective self-test log data structure revision number 1 > SPAN MIN_LBA MAX_LBA CURRENT_TEST_STATUS > 1 0 0 Not_testing > 2 0 0 Not_testing > 3 0 0 Not_testing > 4 0 0 Not_testing > 5 0 0 Not_testing > Selective self-test flags (0x0): > After scanning selected spans, do NOT read-scan remainder of disk. > If Selective self-test is pending on power-up, resume after 0 minute delay. (This is for one drive, but the other is almost identical). Notice I can't complete a long test, since the box will crash, dump and reboot. Following is a backtrace from one of the crash dumps: > # kgdb kernel.debug /var/crash/vmcore.14 > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are > welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. > Type "show copying" to see the conditions. > There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. > This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"... > > Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: > ad8: WARNING - SET_MULTI taskqueue timeout - completing request directly > ad8: WARNING - SET_MULTI requeued due to channel reset > ad8: FAILURE - SET_MULTI timed out > > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 > fault virtual address = 0x188 > fault code = supervisor read, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc05553d4 > stack pointer = 0x28:0xe8efca8c > frame pointer = 0x28:0xe8efcaa4 > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 8125 (smartctl) > trap number = 12 > panic: page fault > cpuid = 0 > Uptime: 37m18s > Physical memory: 2033 MB > Dumping 151 MB: 136 120 104 88 72 56 40 24 8 > > Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/splash_bmp.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/splash_bmp.ko.symbols...done. > done. > Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/splash_bmp.ko > Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/geom_stripe.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/geom_stripe.ko.symbols...done. > done. > Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/geom_stripe.ko > Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/acpi.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/acpi.ko.symbols...done. > done. > Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/acpi.ko > #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:196 > 196 __asm __volatile("movl %%fs:0,%0" : "=r" (td)); > (kgdb) bt > #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:196 > #1 0xc0563d48 in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:418 > #2 0xc0564025 in panic (fmt=Variable "fmt" is not available. > ) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:574 > #3 0xc0732764 in trap_fatal (frame=0xe8efca4c, eva=392) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:950 > #4 0xc07329b4 in trap_pfault (frame=0xe8efca4c, usermode=0, eva=392) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:863 > #5 0xc0733351 in trap (frame=0xe8efca4c) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:541 > #6 0xc0718abb in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:166 > #7 0xc05553d4 in _mtx_lock_sleep (m=0xc5d84acc, tid=3328172032, opts=0, file=0x0, line=0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_mutex.c:339 > #8 0xc056300b in _sema_post (sema=0xc5d84acc, file=0x0, line=0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_sema.c:79 > #9 0xc047cf0c in ata_completed (context=0xc5d84a80, dummy=0) at /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-queue.c:490 > #10 0xc047c7d5 in ata_queue_request (request=0xc5d84a80) at /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-queue.c:112 > #11 0xc046439f in ata_device_ioctl (dev=0xc507d200, cmd=3224920420, data=0xc5cc12c0 "¡") at /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c:493 > #12 0xc04769e9 in ad_ioctl (disk=0xc53cac00, cmd=3224920420, data=0xc5cc12c0, flag=1, td=0xc65fe000) at /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-disk.c:373 > #13 0xc050d83b in g_disk_ioctl (pp=0xc5572d00, cmd=3224920420, data=0xc5cc12c0, fflag=1, td=0xc65fe000) at /usr/src/sys/geom/geom_disk.c:231 > #14 0xc050cc3e in g_dev_ioctl (dev=0xc5556600, cmd=3224920420, data=0xc5cc12c0 "¡", fflag=1, td=0xc65fe000) at /usr/src/sys/geom/geom_dev.c:332 > #15 0xc0502dbf in devfs_ioctl_f (fp=0xc64aba18, com=3224920420, data=0xc5cc12c0, cred=0xc63ee100, td=0xc65fe000) at /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:602 > #16 0xc059d075 in kern_ioctl (td=0xc65fe000, fd=3, com=3224920420, data=0xc5cc12c0 "¡") at file.h:269 > #17 0xc059d1ad in ioctl (td=0xc65fe000, uap=0xe8efccfc) at /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:571 > #18 0xc0732cf5 in syscall (frame=0xe8efcd38) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:1101 > #19 0xc0718b20 in Xint0x80_syscall () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:262 > #20 0x00000033 in ?? () > Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) > (kgdb) Please, I'm really desperate; any help is appreciated. Is this a known problem? Should I upgrade? Is there any settings I can try? Patches? Bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 12:23:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C89D1065740 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:23:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5228A8FC0C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:23:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.37]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 02 Jun 2011 08:23:38 -0400 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.2.3-GA) with ESMTP id AXI26691; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 08:23:38 -0400 Received: from 209-6-91-204.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.91.204]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 02 Jun 2011 08:23:23 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19943.32954.598809.565910@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 08:23:22 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20110602114449.GA18797@think.gnix.co.uk> References: <20110602114449.GA18797@think.gnix.co.uk> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: acroread9 - kernel module load error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:23:39 -0000 Jamie Paul Griffin writes: > Installed this port but the kernel won't load and produces the following > error: > > think# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/linux_adobe start > kldload: can't load /usr/local/libexec/linux_adobe/linux_adobe.ko: Exec > format error > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/linux_adobe: WARNING: Unable to load kernel module > /usr/local/libexec/linux_adobe/linux_adobe.ko > > Has anyone else experienced this? Does anyone have any suggestions to > fix it? It means your kernel and kernel sources are not in sync. The solution is to (re-)build the kernel and program using the same source tree. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 13:13:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A2A1065672 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:13:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from griffin@gnix.co.uk) Received: from think.gnix.co.uk (griffin.gnix.co.uk [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6192A8FC1E for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:13:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from think.gnix.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by think.gnix.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p52DDa1R019061 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:13:37 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from griffin@gnix.co.uk) Received: (from jpg@localhost) by think.gnix.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p52DDaIH019060 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:13:36 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from griffin@gnix.co.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: think.gnix.co.uk: jpg set sender to griffin@gnix.co.uk using -f Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:13:36 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110602131336.GB18797@think.gnix.co.uk> References: <20110602114449.GA18797@think.gnix.co.uk> <19943.32954.598809.565910@jerusalem.litteratus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <19943.32954.598809.565910@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-PGP-Key: http://www.gnix.co.uk/~jpg/jpg-pubkey.asc X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE X-URL: http://www.gnix.co.uk/~jpg/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: acroread9 - kernel module load error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:13:39 -0000 On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:23:22AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: > > Jamie Paul Griffin writes: > > > Installed this port but the kernel won't load and produces the following > > error: > > > > think# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/linux_adobe start > > kldload: can't load /usr/local/libexec/linux_adobe/linux_adobe.ko: Exec > > format error > > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/linux_adobe: WARNING: Unable to load kernel module > > /usr/local/libexec/linux_adobe/linux_adobe.ko > > > > Has anyone else experienced this? Does anyone have any suggestions to > > fix it? > > It means your kernel and kernel sources are not in sync. > The solution is to (re-)build the kernel and program using the > same source tree. ok, thanks for the info. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 14:41:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3714C106566B for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:41:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5FE8FC08 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p52EfQPV023600; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 08:41:26 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p52EfQpm023597; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 08:41:26 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 08:41:26 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Angelo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 02 Jun 2011 08:41:26 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Install ImageMagick configured with Autotrace switch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:41:27 -0000 On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Angelo wrote: > Thanks Peter but I can't seem to build this thing. Please don't top-post, and please trim responses. > I've tried just about everything I can think of to pass the argument > "--with-autotrace" and it throws exceptions or just ignores the command. Patching the ImageMagick Makefile is not too bad: --- graphics/ImageMagick/Makefile.orig 2011-06-02 08:13:35.000000000 -0600 +++ graphics/ImageMagick/Makefile 2011-06-02 08:22:51.000000000 -0600 @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ OPTIONS=\ IMAGEMAGICK_16BIT_PIXEL "16bit pixel support" on \ + IMAGEMAGICK_AUTOTRACE "Autotrace support" off \ IMAGEMAGICK_BZLIB "Bzlib support" on \ IMAGEMAGICK_DJVU "DJVU format support (needs threads)" off \ IMAGEMAGICK_DOT "GraphViz dot graphs support" off \ @@ -228,6 +229,11 @@ CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --without-fftw .endif +.if defined(WITH_IMAGEMAGICK_AUTOTRACE) +LIB_DEPENDS+= autotrace:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/autotrace +CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --with-autotrace +.endif + # Produce BZip compressed MIFF images .if defined(WITHOUT_IMAGEMAGICK_BZLIB) CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --without-bzlib And that seems to produce a working ImageMagick, at least one that can convert jpeg to svg. There may be correctness issues, like whether autotrace requires other ImageMagick options to be enabled (like SVG). The problem is that autotrace depends on ImageMagick, and the patched ImageMagick now depends on autotrace. I don't know enough about either port to fix that. Hopefully someone can, because this seems like a useful addition. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 14:42:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96EA8106566C; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:42:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexmiroslav@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E5B8FC16; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:42:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so565735gxk.13 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 07:42:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mXsfe1o6i7diMDHSMFVfF+1oXnvMe/BPNcKtbPNOHeY=; b=eOYwMl0ioxQ0CqVblDclV/F6yzU3qWYpIe7SdAgMnJEd7XTw4EpToIKpBw2Er3v52T Ymg0mTmOVma+i6hsehnUIIJCYohmNiCyxTpRzOL/fPXsU+t5xnGrml1Lk5l+Kj3FKA/W q/Gzy04cWb2A8PApzxOdBRSlMNkoHDnaJalc4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=M+am7YSgpwW8FuvBjxPrbRj4vL2fKBsr7HtJoQcaQSeyV8oXbglR8tstLQ+ar4kEyL aCf9kC9Hb9wpZJNDgA8NODh3LEji3QlE0PUl2XJCN4BI98XcE2hn6Lp1kvQqnRZJCfBL vR69xB6k0tttAi2e3wh8lLtkb9f5OipgwoEXI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.116.1 with SMTP id f1mr890753yhh.522.1307025727568; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 07:42:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.95.38 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 07:42:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DE6A4B1.70105@FreeBSD.org> References: <4DE63A9D.2090509@FreeBSD.org> <4DE6A4B1.70105@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:42:07 -0400 Message-ID: From: Aleksandr Miroslav To: glarkin@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: src upgrading jails (no ezjail, no "service" jails) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:42:08 -0000 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Greg Larkin wrote: > Those commands will update the base system in the jail directory > "jaildir1" with the latest bits that were previously compiled with > "make buildworld". don't believe they will disturb any other data in > /usr/local, if that's what you are concerned about. Yeah, I ran it and it mostly worked, although running "mergemaster -p -D /path/to/jail" before installworld didn't really back up files like it normally does, but I was able to pull the most recent backup and fix that. > I use ezjail here, and it will automate a lot of these steps for you. > Is there a reason that you can't use it? I didn't create these jails with ezjails, so I was working under the impression that I could not use ezjail to upgrade them. Is that not correct? Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 14:53:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D9B106566B for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:53:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glarkin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.sourcehosting.net (mail1.sourcehosting.net [74.205.51.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873558FC0A for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:53:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 68-189-245-235.dhcp.oxfr.ma.charter.com ([68.189.245.235] helo=cube.entropy.prv) by mail1.sourcehosting.net with esmtp (Exim 4.73 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1QS9Du-000Gcl-TE; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:50:15 -0400 Received: from v104.entropy.prv (v104.entropy.prv [192.168.1.104]) by cube.entropy.prv (Postfix) with ESMTP id B02754EBBB8C; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:53:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4DE7A3FD.5020505@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:53:49 -0400 From: Greg Larkin Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aleksandr Miroslav References: <4DE63A9D.2090509@FreeBSD.org> <4DE6A4B1.70105@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=1C940290 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.189.245.235 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: glarkin@FreeBSD.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail1.sourcehosting.net X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC,SARE_SUB_OBFU_OTHER, TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.sourcehosting.net) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: src upgrading jails (no ezjail, no "service" jails) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: glarkin@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:53:55 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 6/2/11 10:42 AM, Aleksandr Miroslav wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Greg Larkin wrote: >> Those commands will update the base system in the jail directory >> "jaildir1" with the latest bits that were previously compiled with >> "make buildworld". don't believe they will disturb any other data in >> /usr/local, if that's what you are concerned about. > > Yeah, I ran it and it mostly worked, although running "mergemaster -p -D > /path/to/jail" before installworld didn't really back up files like it > normally does, but I was able to pull the most recent backup and fix > that. > >> I use ezjail here, and it will automate a lot of these steps for you. >> Is there a reason that you can't use it? > > I didn't create these jails with ezjails, so I was working under the > impression that I could not use ezjail to upgrade them. Is that not > correct? I should have written that sentence a bit differently. I was wondering why you didn't use ezjail to create the jails in the first place, not that you weren't using it to upgrade them now. Would it be painful to migrate your current jails to ezjail to make future updates easier? Regards, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. http://twitter.com/cpucycle/ - Follow you, follow me -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk3no/0ACgkQ0sRouByUApASpwCfccMPb2A9vLvvHRNPX7if/A95 F+IAnR2pBsKioXWwqoyPcBMZDQ4P8GGk =uKBs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 14:54:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2626106566B for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:54:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379E78FC1E for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:54:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236AEE6303; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:54:53 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=rveLtu6j6KC2 ZGbfN6Gj7kIZM4I=; b=ryvgBB9fgtj2ZGG+j8Ng7r+buFXJ7f5oqO495CINiLxL aIx1ASofwdfzaSKuQ/3dUo0DADDDV7YuDYp1yfdQi+sMU1tcM2vJhhfaxIpE5ENM Qk7m5Zmqq/1oNsM2MwUKEYnJuHVe3JnH5VS2jtZGYFMLNuLJQfX93Nev6Zvmd+o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=BezTdS tm2ODhRlDTKOPWQEB2kefBbKnBPyS0GmABB0EZl/E7wf5oGM4mbtIgaPMxHJegd1 Kb7gb9vQQtp6wcA8/wA/x7guytk+OgTTo8D6L3/TwvJf6uajvdztCStSdoKTDKmr Kgd70layx9ShgZ/ugdCAnAsS2uEBS0mA7P52M= Received: from unknown (188-222-18-231.zone13.bethere.co.uk [188.222.18.231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D43ECE62D2; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:54:52 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:54:52 +0100 From: Bruce Cran To: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <20110602155452.00006775@unknown> In-Reply-To: <4DE77F01.1050900@netfence.it> References: <4DE77F01.1050900@netfence.it> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8cvs47 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Critical issues with WD green drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:54:57 -0000 On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:16:01 +0200 Andrea Venturoli wrote: > In a server of mine (7.3p4/i386) I replaced a 1TB Hitachi SATA drive > (which worked perfectly), with two brand new Western Digital 2TB > disks. Now I'm having critical problems, ranging from the disks > getting stuck, to the box rebooting. > Those are not the main disks in the box, so they are currently > unmounted; I wasn't even able to run newfs on them, since every > process that tries to use these disk will hang after a while (and > can't be killed either). I'd guess this is probably due to their overly-aggressive power management. If you can, run wdidle3.exe from a Windows environment to turn off the default idle timer. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 15:06:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C472106566C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from griffin@gnix.co.uk) Received: from think.gnix.co.uk (griffin.gnix.co.uk [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC5A8FC1B for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:06:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from think.gnix.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by think.gnix.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p52F6IAb006872 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:06:18 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from griffin@gnix.co.uk) Received: (from jpg@localhost) by think.gnix.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p52F6IFX006871 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:06:18 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from griffin@gnix.co.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: think.gnix.co.uk: jpg set sender to griffin@gnix.co.uk using -f Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:06:18 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110602150618.GA6853@think.gnix.co.uk> References: <20110602114449.GA18797@think.gnix.co.uk> <19943.32954.598809.565910@jerusalem.litteratus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <19943.32954.598809.565910@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-PGP-Key: http://www.gnix.co.uk/~jpg/jpg-pubkey.asc X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p2 X-URL: http://www.gnix.co.uk/~jpg/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: acroread9 - kernel module load error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:06:20 -0000 On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:23:22AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: > > Jamie Paul Griffin writes: > > > Installed this port but the kernel won't load and produces the following > > error: > > > > think# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/linux_adobe start > > kldload: can't load /usr/local/libexec/linux_adobe/linux_adobe.ko: Exec > > format error > > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/linux_adobe: WARNING: Unable to load kernel module > > /usr/local/libexec/linux_adobe/linux_adobe.ko > > > > Has anyone else experienced this? Does anyone have any suggestions to > > fix it? > > It means your kernel and kernel sources are not in sync. > The solution is to (re-)build the kernel and program using the > same source tree. ok, i've just been through make buildworld, etc. and rebuilt the port but still the same problem? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 16:09:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 626A51065674 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:09:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from cp-out9.libero.it (cp-out9.libero.it [212.52.84.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7028FC1B for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:09:54 +0000 (UTC) X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0203.4DE7B5D1.008E,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-libjamoibt: 1555 Received: from soth.ventu (151.41.174.43) by cp-out9.libero.it (8.5.133) id 4DD242330286318E; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:09:53 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p52G9kOZ003420; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:09:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4DE7B5CA.5040207@netfence.it> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:09:46 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; it-IT; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110429 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Reid Linnemann References: <4DE77F01.1050900@netfence.it> <20110602155452.00006775@unknown> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.1.2.13 Cc: Bruce Cran , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Critical issues with WD green drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:09:55 -0000 On 06/02/11 18:02, Reid Linnemann wrote: > I've gotten similar errors before with a failing power supply. After > an electrical storm I started getting HD errors all over the place. I > replaced drives, futzed with SATA cables, booted, rebooted, and when > the machine got stable finally I just tried to leave it alone. Finally > I bought a new atom board, thinking that some component on the > mainboard had been killed by the storm. Problems persisted until my > mini-itx case came in with a fresh (less powerful) power supply. > Thanks, but in my case this is unlikely. I have reduntant power supplies and 4 SAS drives which work flawlessly. Only the two SATA have problems. bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 16:31:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23066106566B for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:31:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linnemannr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1218FC0A for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyj12 with SMTP id 12so1222651iyj.13 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:31:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=RoJY54zyw/y+GzOGMYbPGS9ij385YTgn8dHSm8+Jtdg=; b=W4TAdUVDoVWiyDvMzqXATH2v2ZjbWz+x25FlaJWtJ7X2bxvrK7ogaeGC+tAD6DOWEV khGh/9dOl56QbDXvFEEGCuAu6+jhgBp9QfCLR4rPIlmiHhIf1zM4xC3poeCddLqfHZ8H XnO6V2vY/vnK24jpZn05W+GnsUoJKT34uMLUc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=goAeAcKK35d3tzxHHgz5niw7In4PmhRYAsEcV21QrrjqYoJtmKYeh1uj99Kw9BcnQ5 wKhkWD5WQfX2Q+oaSsZ93qEMbhSj/wBPcvO758RkDMuSW0udCOWihuOJI5mwTE/iqC6M CdUhzA64g8kjv9SD64U54Eot5DXOAVceYAUxw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.181.98 with SMTP id bx34mr1008255ibb.161.1307030561449; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:02:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linnemannr@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.144.71 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:02:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110602155452.00006775@unknown> References: <4DE77F01.1050900@netfence.it> <20110602155452.00006775@unknown> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:02:41 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: raZytZA7AHKKF1YVECCT28iMuDc Message-ID: From: Reid Linnemann To: Bruce Cran Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Critical issues with WD green drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:31:15 -0000 On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:16:01 +0200 > Andrea Venturoli wrote: > >> In a server of mine (7.3p4/i386) I replaced a 1TB Hitachi SATA drive >> (which worked perfectly), with two brand new Western Digital 2TB >> disks. Now I'm having critical problems, ranging from the disks >> getting stuck, to the box rebooting. >> Those are not the main disks in the box, so they are currently >> unmounted; I wasn't even able to run newfs on them, since every >> process that tries to use these disk will hang after a while (and >> can't be killed either). > > I'd guess this is probably due to their overly-aggressive power > management. If you can, run wdidle3.exe from a Windows environment to > turn off the default idle timer. > > -- > Bruce Cran > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I've gotten similar errors before with a failing power supply. After an electrical storm I started getting HD errors all over the place. I replaced drives, futzed with SATA cables, booted, rebooted, and when the machine got stable finally I just tried to leave it alone. Finally I bought a new atom board, thinking that some component on the mainboard had been killed by the storm. Problems persisted until my mini-itx case came in with a fresh (less powerful) power supply. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 16:35:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD15E106564A for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:35:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from inyaoo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44BE38FC13 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:35:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyg7 with SMTP id 7so452104eyg.13 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:35:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=htO/Ue5J/BVFPafwHobQySnnyyjBJRtAVFwLTd0FWk8=; b=BR1niKSVgjxQWq1bBA/Vky8rbC+qpfpS3xDBrBzVmW73ZEzxws9Qi6muRCOwQ4H/WP It1KFj07qCa8zKcoXzEQ/hD9Wlyi7PtaDDGRmzCV5OjidO4ZiLY7oPHrpMqTAfn0tD3r vOpsnIsHrIfhljjhVwNWHod93VGkExbz1Jv+U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=mFj2b0Nz1oh5zzhmJ0WDIcXW944z15lh+jug/VtlvaEnMKMz86m2zgi1zPOiq01WxP +sr8xHE6WoT+7Insh975s7SbPsBnKvzOlLYG0AgwjcAM6EloDovTefxIVrRobcdK+QFw woD4gwxL/7IRiWiEg1K5Yr/CL7XdN2n1+bSCM= Received: by 10.213.27.22 with SMTP id g22mr2488377ebc.120.1307032518432; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:35:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([72.46.129.46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b19sm508635eec.8.2011.06.02.09.35.12 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:35:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Pan Tsu To: Warren Block References: Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:35:00 +0400 In-Reply-To: (Warren Block's message of "Thu, 2 Jun 2011 08:41:26 -0600 (MDT)") Message-ID: <86lixk8a4r.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Angelo , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Install ImageMagick configured with Autotrace switch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:35:20 -0000 Warren Block writes: > On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Angelo wrote: > >> Thanks Peter but I can't seem to build this thing. > > Please don't top-post, and please trim responses. > >> I've tried just about everything I can think of to pass the argument >> "--with-autotrace" and it throws exceptions or just ignores the command. > > Patching the ImageMagick Makefile is not too bad: > > --- graphics/ImageMagick/Makefile.orig 2011-06-02 08:13:35.000000000 -0600 > +++ graphics/ImageMagick/Makefile 2011-06-02 08:22:51.000000000 -0600 > @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ > > OPTIONS=\ > IMAGEMAGICK_16BIT_PIXEL "16bit pixel support" on \ > + IMAGEMAGICK_AUTOTRACE "Autotrace support" off \ > IMAGEMAGICK_BZLIB "Bzlib support" on \ > IMAGEMAGICK_DJVU "DJVU format support (needs threads)" off \ > IMAGEMAGICK_DOT "GraphViz dot graphs support" off \ > @@ -228,6 +229,11 @@ > CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --without-fftw > .endif > > +.if defined(WITH_IMAGEMAGICK_AUTOTRACE) > +LIB_DEPENDS+= autotrace:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/autotrace > +CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --with-autotrace > +.endif > + > # Produce BZip compressed MIFF images > .if defined(WITHOUT_IMAGEMAGICK_BZLIB) > CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --without-bzlib > > And that seems to produce a working ImageMagick, at least one that can > convert jpeg to svg. There may be correctness issues, like whether > autotrace requires other ImageMagick options to be enabled (like SVG). > > The problem is that autotrace depends on ImageMagick, and the patched > ImageMagick now depends on autotrace. I don't know enough about > either port to fix that. Hopefully someone can, because this seems > like a useful addition. In a circular dependency with x264 (lavf input) <-> ffmpeg (x264 encoder) was resolved in favor of x264 autodetecting presence of ffmpeg which makes x264 in the package unable to read popular formats. I wonder which frontend is more useful for enconding in h264... As autotrace leverages ImageMagick for reading more formats but can work without. Why not make it autodetect it then? %% Index: graphics/autotrace/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /a/.cvsup/ports/graphics/autotrace/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.52 diff -u -p -r1.52 Makefile --- graphics/autotrace/Makefile 2 May 2011 12:44:35 -0000 1.52 +++ graphics/autotrace/Makefile 2 Jun 2011 16:13:03 -0000 @@ -14,8 +14,7 @@ MASTER_SITES= SF/${PORTNAME}/AutoTrace/$ MAINTAINER= ports@FreeBSD.org COMMENT= Convert bitmap to vector graphics -LIB_DEPENDS= png.6:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/png \ - MagickWand.4:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/ImageMagick +LIB_DEPENDS= png.6:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/png USE_AUTOTOOLS= libtool USE_LDCONFIG= yes %% From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 19:59:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249CA106564A for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Dave.Robison@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E027A8FC0C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SBHFISLREXT03 ([10.132.254.62]) by SCSFISLTC02 (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p52Jga3h030888 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:42:36 -0500 Received: from SBHFISLTCGW04.FNFIS.COM (Not Verified[10.132.248.123]) by SBHFISLREXT03 with MailMarshal (v6, 5, 4, 7535) id ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:43:21 -0500 Received: from sbhfisltcgw02.FNFIS.COM ([10.132.248.122]) by SBHFISLTCGW04.FNFIS.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:42:36 -0500 Received: from lefty.vicor.com ([10.132.254.136]) by sbhfisltcgw02.FNFIS.COM over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:42:35 -0500 Message-ID: <4DE7E7A7.7040509@fisglobal.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:42:31 -0700 From: "Robison, Dave" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110120 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4DE77F01.1050900@netfence.it> <20110602155452.00006775@unknown> <4DE7B5CA.5040207@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <4DE7B5CA.5040207@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jun 2011 19:42:36.0405 (UTC) FILETIME=[394EEA50:01CC215D] Subject: Re: Critical issues with WD green drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: david.robison@fisglobal.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:59:35 -0000 On 06/02/2011 09:09, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 06/02/11 18:02, Reid Linnemann wrote: > >> I've gotten similar errors before with a failing power supply. After >> an electrical storm I started getting HD errors all over the place. I >> replaced drives, futzed with SATA cables, booted, rebooted, and when >> the machine got stable finally I just tried to leave it alone. Finally >> I bought a new atom board, thinking that some component on the >> mainboard had been killed by the storm. Problems persisted until my >> mini-itx case came in with a fresh (less powerful) power supply. >> > > Thanks, but in my case this is unlikely. > I have reduntant power supplies and 4 SAS drives which work flawlessly. > Only the two SATA have problems. > > bye & Thanks > av. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I've had serious problems with those drives, including more than one which was dead right out of the box. Dave -- Dave Robison Sales Solution Architect II FIS Banking Solutions 510/621-2089 (w) 530/518-5194 (c) 510/621-2020 (f) daver@vicor.com david.robison@fisglobal.com _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _____________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 20:13:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5932C106566B for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:13:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redtick@sbcglobal.net) Received: from nm1-vm1.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm1-vm1.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.94.236.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A4758FC0A for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:13:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [66.94.237.198] by nm1.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2011 20:13:24 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.118] by tm9.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2011 20:13:24 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1023.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2011 20:13:24 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 470521.48712.bm@omp1023.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 2025 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Jun 2011 20:13:24 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s1024; t=1307045604; bh=3zVse8ZpmQHkZxL8vbQ6EMZMz83y78wAe54N0DuUZFo=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MP147wGNJOVUv4ZFtnT9am9JdT1VWDIeFLuY2uD8LGeZ3OcJan3w20rdYhLj8gc/WLyqt6Ok/v0VD4lzguDUZOo3utYymGZCeAfgVhH1uNDEQRa7I7suHqJZo/tGhP3e6zCotmXksur5sgkzhp5+qF8h20wtfaFo/PMw8QgrjNw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pAMzTL1yfMTn1LB+hxtsfCo3PXVbIgBVsVsmOJZ0Xdvzm/BMJpsh6jyxpzSp414w3N9F/7Ao2TQNw6SV077joFvv+xO2jmW06Y26mYR8Msy/g4U/j3ZOsLEhKUvdJaZG8Ju1sE1qUZb1+p0JEY6PwwpeW+xDmqpHJ2uxire5zk8=; Message-ID: <249574.99100.qm@web81202.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 4FIZrwoVM1k5F4M9aG0.h5P9ZpTOCdr54wjLeZfGP.NN3V9 NYLeFFCE9oyvgRqVb01JsurnDHNJmAo2StnsYuDfzXDJij5q0uvHVs5HycnY Ssmo_dhF_7lOLSk0RgVyDE_gUTOD9.MnMxUCHQq8B.nyxqm_ljaY_dgdASJG Iv.FEQIwgr5g8MGbXS7c72CQMj.WsSZ5veNb1j_.Uf9cCOqXWV0IomWB4Km. oj5D1j8oXylN51BAxJ88mvoxeNosYYRYDMOeL.kTStx5Zd3IEYehuF.6Fwso GC.tCcTRQGNfaoDDBIN3ydeGZdU.6U7qLizFX325nd5cFzsJAwqhAqpTPd0W G2sxOktNq25yblQxfdtNl_FLjJYa5eRgt8jHH13Z9GaVuSLNRqMRX_PMhwj3 ZVbdlW12fTl7ATv_V Received: from [75.41.234.83] by web81202.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:13:24 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/14.0.1 YahooMailWebService/0.8.111.303096 Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:13:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark To: help help In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Critical issues with WD green drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:13:25 -0000 --- On Thu, 6/2/11, Reid Linnemann wrote: > From: Reid Linnemann > Subject: Re: Critical issues with WD green drives > To: "Bruce Cran" > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Thursday, June 2, 2011, 11:02 AM > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Bruce > Cran > wrote: > > On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:16:01 +0200 > > Andrea Venturoli > wrote: > > > >> In a server of mine (7.3p4/i386) I replaced a 1TB > Hitachi SATA drive > >> (which worked perfectly), with two brand new > Western Digital 2TB > >> disks. Now I'm having critical problems, ranging > from the disks > >> getting stuck, to the box rebooting. > >> Those are not the main disks in the box, so they > are currently > >> unmounted; I wasn't even able to run newfs on > them, since every > >> process that tries to use these disk will hang > after a while (and > >> can't be killed either). > > > > I'd guess this is probably due to their > overly-aggressive power > > management. If you can, run wdidle3.exe from a Windows > environment to > > turn off the default idle timer. > > > > -- > > Bruce Cran > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > I've gotten similar errors before with a failing power > supply. After > an electrical storm I started getting HD errors all over > the place. I > replaced drives, futzed with SATA cables, booted, rebooted, > and when > the machine got stable finally I just tried to leave it > alone. Finally > I bought a new atom board, thinking that some component on > the > mainboard had been killed by the storm. Problems persisted > until my > mini-itx case came in with a fresh (less powerful) power > supply. My "duh" moment not too long ago. I found that the sata power "adapters" had pins that were to small for a proper connection to the power supply. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 20:20:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686B1106564A for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:20:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noc@hdk5.net) Received: from moku60.aloha50.net (moku60.aloha50.net [66.180.132.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3193F8FC1D for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:20:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mohawk7.intra.net (unknown [66.180.149.18]) by moku60.aloha50.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFEBD1703E; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:01:18 -1000 (HST) Message-ID: <4DE7EC0D.2010303@hdk5.net> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:01:17 -1000 From: Al Plant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071128 FreeBSD/i386 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: FreeBSD Questions off line? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: noc@hdk5.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:20:27 -0000 Aloha, I havent seen any FreeBSD questions on line for 2 days. Any body have any knowledge about this? ~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii - Phone: 808-284-2740 + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org + + http://aloha50.net - Supporting - FreeBSD 7.2 - 8.0 - 9* + < email: noc@hdk5.net > "All that's really worth doing is what we do for others."- Lewis Carrol From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 20:25:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29171106566B for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:25:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C8F8FC17 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so1889526bwz.13 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.82.1 with SMTP id z1mr211859bkk.150.1307046325235; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:25:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.82.199 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:25:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DE7EC0D.2010303@hdk5.net> References: <4DE7EC0D.2010303@hdk5.net> From: Chris Brennan Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:25:05 -0400 Message-ID: To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: FreeBSD Questions off line? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:25:27 -0000 On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Al Plant wrote: Aloha, > > I havent seen any FreeBSD questions on line for 2 days. Any body have any > knowledge about this? > Well, it's not offline, your mail came though just fine ... maybe no one has sent anything? -- > A: Yes. > >Q: Are you sure? > >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 20:29:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB97106566B for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:29:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noeldude@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E5A8FC14 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:29:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so779490gxk.13 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:29:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hhZRFVS58tcblw2hct6WHbqU3nwqMK9nDBMyebIga/s=; b=oRDEpZ+/QZpYJ0phAsc45Y5RtRa/pJ94LDD89bnnmGBqHlt2S/8zk+eziIMfKTU+uJ vpLaS8fS5sN4ewbu/v2xCIbSosGQhIpuC2hXm7/caGmeOG8Y7YPxRosTRYHmnvFX2itz FlUvcfm0WKT4Ty4DPvTXpm+jUqJoVVf2NZFIg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tB6/qPrjzlSiu2amaFjzRnTni2yO3eeL2Gdq8gaCgVT0b9tfwSjVKnl2hKP2NPdQiR fYIhI8pEcxY7wQvQI351ST80vXthZHl05RmcxbFnB9eiksHMzoQvl3yBXeKsyrbkK7Ck tfQ5gkL2gA53TBV5pws71UXXlkHeC0lFXPlgI= Received: by 10.101.178.5 with SMTP id f5mr787079anp.105.1307046564692; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:29:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.1.1.173] (97-82-84-54.static.kgpt.tn.charter.com [97.82.84.54]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x32sm665017anx.32.2011.06.02.13.29.22 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:29:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DE7F2A5.2030209@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:29:25 -0500 From: Noel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: noc@hdk5.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4DE7EC0D.2010303@hdk5.net> In-Reply-To: <4DE7EC0D.2010303@hdk5.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD Questions off line? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:29:26 -0000 The archives show 30+ messages yesterday and today. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2011-June/date.html Check your mail server, your subscription, etc. -- Noel Jones On 6/2/2011 3:01 PM, Al Plant wrote: > Aloha, > > I havent seen any FreeBSD questions on line for 2 days. Any > body have any knowledge about this? > > > ~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii - Phone: 808-284-2740 > + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org + > + http://aloha50.net - Supporting - FreeBSD 7.2 - 8.0 - > 9* + > < email: noc@hdk5.net > > "All that's really worth doing is what we do for others."- > Lewis Carrol > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 21:43:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C741065670 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:43:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [91.121.44.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3186E8FC12 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:43:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (6.176.97.84.rev.sfr.net [84.97.176.6]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A327863307B for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:43:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE54B73087 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:43:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:43:51 +0200 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110602234351.640130dc@davenulle.org> In-Reply-To: <19943.32954.598809.565910@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <20110602114449.GA18797@think.gnix.co.uk> <19943.32954.598809.565910@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: acroread9 - kernel module load error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:43:54 -0000 Le Thu, 2 Jun 2011 08:23:22 -0400, Robert Huff a écrit : > > think# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/linux_adobe start > > kldload: can't load /usr/local/libexec/linux_adobe/linux_adobe.ko: > > Exec format error > > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/linux_adobe: WARNING: Unable to load kernel > > module /usr/local/libexec/linux_adobe/linux_adobe.ko > > > > Has anyone else experienced this? Does anyone have any suggestions > > to fix it? > > It means your kernel and kernel sources are not in sync. > The solution is to (re-)build the kernel and program using the > same source tree. We need a kernel module to see some pdf with acrobat now? Oh my god. Regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 22:14:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8766A1065673 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 22:14:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCBA8FC16 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 22:14:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-63-204.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.63.204]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E711DD8B; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 00:14:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id p52MEaJW001815; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 00:14:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 00:14:36 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Patrick Lamaiziere Message-Id: <20110603001436.80c4e074.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20110602234351.640130dc@davenulle.org> References: <20110602114449.GA18797@think.gnix.co.uk> <19943.32954.598809.565910@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20110602234351.640130dc@davenulle.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: acroread9 - kernel module load error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:14:40 -0000 On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:43:51 +0200, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > We need a kernel module to see some pdf with acrobat now? I was thinking exactly the same (without further investigation). Luckily xpdf and gv, as well as Gnome's and KDE's PDF viewer don't need kernel modules. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 01:36:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7C9106566C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 01:36:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480598FC12 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 01:36:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p531DPZ3099496 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:13:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p531DP1f099495; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:13:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA16547; Thu, 2 Jun 11 18:01:11 PDT Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:01:11 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: freebsd@edvax.de, patfbsd@davenulle.org Message-Id: <4de83257.W27NJ7RJWQamsMHt%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20110602114449.GA18797@think.gnix.co.uk> <19943.32954.598809.565910@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20110602234351.640130dc@davenulle.org> <20110603001436.80c4e074.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20110603001436.80c4e074.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: acroread9 - kernel module load error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 01:36:22 -0000 Polytropon wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:43:51 +0200, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > > We need a kernel module to see some pdf with acrobat now? > > I was thinking exactly the same (without further investigation). I suspect it's because FreeBSD uses Linux Acroread, so we need the Linuxulator, plus (I suppose) an additional API or 3. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 01:38:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D1B106566C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 01:38:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from newsbox@mjws.net) Received: from mail2.mjws.net (mail2.mjws.net [68.183.109.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38A18FC0C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 01:38:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail2.mjws.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.mjws.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847FEE83F; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 01:20:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mjws.net Received: from mail2.mjws.net ([127.0.0.1]) by mail2.mjws.net (mail2.mjws.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qP5Ppw+xFlep; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 01:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from secure.mjws.net (www.mjws.net [68.183.109.239]) by mail2.mjws.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3669CE83D; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 01:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 68.183.109.181 (SquirrelMail authenticated user newsbox@mjws.net) by secure.mjws.net with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:20:03 -0700 Message-ID: <9a6e2271cc3970126017f13be03fd12f.squirrel@secure.mjws.net> In-Reply-To: <20110529222909.GA11577@SDF.ORG> References: <20110529024454.GA26543@SDF.ORG> <20110529143237.GA16057@SDF.ORG> <20110529222909.GA11577@SDF.ORG> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:20:03 -0700 From: newsbox@mjws.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Joe Altman Subject: Re: Building misc/freebsd-doc-en fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 01:38:18 -0000 > On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 02:32:37PM +0000, Joe Altman wrote: >> >> There is this thread from 2009, and it looks like the same issue as >> the one in this message: >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-December/209892.html >> >> It looks like I'll need to open a bug report with the Doc project >> team. > > After reading the thread referenced above, and looking at the output > of my build, I noticed that the build was failing in different areas. > > So I decided to run make on the port multiple times, and eventually > the port installed successfully. However, the port in my tree (dated # > $FreeBSD: ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en/Makefile,v 1.36 2011/05/22 > 14:28:49 blackend Exp $) in a fresh tree made only through > 2010, according to the copyright at the top of the > handbook. Individual files in that doc tree were variously dated; the > newest being 8/2010. > > So I ran make, multiple times, on the source; and that gave me a doc > tree dated 2011. Most of the files there were dated 5/29/11. A few > exceptions were found in image files dated 3/2010, which all loaded in > SeaMonkey, except for some files in: advanced-networking, security, > vinum, geom. I may have missed others in other books. > > To summarize: > > 1) It appears that make is, in this case, a hammer that must be > applied more than once to either the source or the port. > > 2) Not all images are seen as valid, and according to make may have > bad magic numbers. If building from source is used on a fresh tree, it > may be possible to have make ignore all the errors by using the -k > flag. > > 3) I have no idea how things will go with an upgrade to the doc > source; I normally use portupgrade, so I suppose I will find out > later. > > I've submitted a bug report. > > Best regards, > > Joe > > > > > Hi, This might not be the same as an issue I had because I'm not really sure how the docs are built. I did not have doc in my cvs supfile at first. I have the following in my cvs supfile: src-all ports-all tag=. doc-all tag=. And my issue went away if I remember correctly. Regards, Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 10:12:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C42B1065678 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 10:12:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from griffin@gnix.co.uk) Received: from think.gnix.co.uk (griffin.gnix.co.uk [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C010D8FC17 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 10:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from think.gnix.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by think.gnix.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p53ACjXU010014 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:12:46 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from griffin@gnix.co.uk) Received: (from jpg@localhost) by think.gnix.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p53ACjLt010013 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:12:45 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from griffin@gnix.co.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: think.gnix.co.uk: jpg set sender to griffin@gnix.co.uk using -f Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:12:45 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110603101245.GB9958@think.gnix.co.uk> References: <20110602114449.GA18797@think.gnix.co.uk> <19943.32954.598809.565910@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20110602234351.640130dc@davenulle.org> <20110603001436.80c4e074.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110603001436.80c4e074.freebsd@edvax.de> X-PGP-Key: http://www.gnix.co.uk/~jpg/jpg-pubkey.asc X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p2 X-URL: http://www.gnix.co.uk/~jpg/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: acroread9 - kernel module load error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 10:12:48 -0000 On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 12:14:36AM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 23:43:51 +0200, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > > We need a kernel module to see some pdf with acrobat now? > > I was thinking exactly the same (without further investigation). > Luckily xpdf and gv, as well as Gnome's and KDE's PDF viewer > don't need kernel modules. :-) Which is exactly the way i've headed. It's just not worth the hassle. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 12:18:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACA9106566B for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from woodbine.london.02.net (woodbine.london.02.net [87.194.255.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964858FC12 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:18:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (93.97.24.219) by woodbine.london.02.net (8.5.133) id 4D8CD8C901C941D6 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 13:18:19 +0100 Message-ID: <4DE8D108.6060701@onetel.com> Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:18:16 +0100 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User Questions References: <4DE6D7DA.7010304@centurytel.net> In-Reply-To: <4DE6D7DA.7010304@centurytel.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Build failure /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3 on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 12:18:21 -0000 Michael D. Norwick wrote: > Good Day; > > It appears that I cannot build openoffice.org-3 from ports due to an > error similar to > this; > > http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/OpenOffice-3-2-fails-to-build-on-FreeBSD-8-0-STABLE-amd64-td3873768.html > > > 1 module(s): > nss > need(s) *to* be rebuilt > > Reason(s): > > ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making > /usr/*ports*/editors/openoffice.org-3/work/OOO320_m12/nss/ > > Attention: if you *build* and deliver *the* above module(s) you may > prolongue your *the* *build* issuing command "*build* --*from* nss" > > and ... > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel.openoffice/2805 > > 1 module(s): > instsetoo_native > need(s) to be rebuilt > > Reason(s): > > ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making > /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3/work > /OOO330_m20/instsetoo_native/util > > Attention: if you fix the errors in above module(s) you may prolongue > your the build issuing command: > > build --from instsetoo_native > > ***** Error code 1 > > I am sorry that I cannot give you the exact error message because I did > 'make clean' in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-3 during my > troubleshooting. Google produced the above hits and they are the same > type of module build error I am seeing. > My build error is in module moz. Try building it with WITHOUT_MOZILLA see http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=208692+0+current/freebsd-questions Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 12:37:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E688106564A for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:37:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kayasaman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216A58FC21 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so1903623wyf.13 for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 05:37:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=B3hpUmlFJ4+hxe3zStSbcdv/WpVHJwpnoQ/vC2s9+J4=; b=K6fn4HRNzIQh3tqeAYHzOw+VR7iXec1K5xY5hqwfrRA2eqDRlRr811BtFdNxiG8R+H DdagfJc3PHbKoToYx+OaiHDNNeaENW+TOOYT4qjYACheu/ArqsaC5P8zBp6mJbLJcjvn CH1Hz7bkVWZao1eOqTnbNZrFVyL+GBsYCgS1s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ViqEqKFBBURyXJ5SKzzpunqg+TomKyI5BP5zQGOzx/QCjG7Am0PmWNMTjQXqirAmMT m9AfP8o8Jz4dii0xNNWYj/IGFDDACg+86jKlcMjvDQ1CtIkApsaxzqKKPzzJTxwsvW6y 2fHFS7Afi/mTwTdNQjhuAE5KuaPtUBKWdl2xo= Received: by 10.227.178.202 with SMTP id bn10mr1905557wbb.16.1307103004598; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 05:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.16.0.3] ([78.186.130.149]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fm14sm1005606wbb.7.2011.06.03.05.09.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 03 Jun 2011 05:09:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DE8CF13.1040304@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:09:55 +0300 From: Kaya Saman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Strange system lockups - kernel saying disk error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 12:37:30 -0000 Hi, I have an ancient pre-HT PIV machine with <500MB RAM. The system has an extra PCI->SATA card installed so I can make use of modern high capacity drives. Everything was running fine until round about 2 days ago when the system started locking up on me? Current drive configuration for the system is: 40GB IDE drive as root (ad2) - UFS2 500GB IDE drive for storage (ad3) - EXT3 1TB SATA drive for storage (ad4) - UFS2 750GB SATA drive for storage (ad8) - EXT3 I had an issue with the 750GB drive which the file system seemed to have got corrupted so I powered down and backed the information up to a 2TB SATA drive using ddrescue and the Gentoo Linux based System Rescue CD. I put the 2TB drive in place of the 1TB ad4 drive physically. Once backed up I powered down again and re-installed the 1TB SATA drive into ad4 position on system and completely removed the 2TB backup. When booted back into FreeBSD upon boot I received this error: WARNING: Kernel Errors Present ad4: FAILURE - WRITE_DMA48 status=51 error=4 LBA=1 ...: 1 Time(s) g_vfs_done():ad4e[WRITE(offset=974444691456, length=16384)]error = 5 ...: 1 Time(s) The current status of the disks seemed to be ok though: 1 Time(s): ad2: 38166MB at ata1-master UDMA33 1 Time(s): ad2: DMA limited to UDMA33, controller found non-ATA66 cable 1 Time(s): ad3: 476940MB at ata1-slave UDMA33 1 Time(s): ad3: DMA limited to UDMA33, controller found non-ATA66 cable 1 Time(s): ad4: 953869MB at ata2-master SATA150 1 Time(s): ad8: 715404MB at ata4-master SATA150 1 Time(s): agp0: on hostb0 1 Time(s): ata0: on atapci0 1 Time(s): ata0: [ITHREAD] 1 Time(s): ata1: on atapci0 1 Time(s): ata1: [ITHREAD] 1 Time(s): ata2: on atapci1 1 Time(s): ata2: [ITHREAD] 1 Time(s): ata3: on atapci1 1 Time(s): ata3: [ITHREAD] 1 Time(s): ata4: on atapci1 1 Time(s): ata4: [ITHREAD] 1 Time(s): ata5: on atapci1 In order to test if the error was due to disk failure I powered down and disconnected the ad4 and ad3 disks and powered back up. The system still seems to be locking on me and I can't understand why? Through Google'ing a discovered a post by Jeremy Chadwick about these kinds of errors: http://wiki.freebsd.org/JeremyChadwick/ATA_issues_and_troubleshooting however since the system board is pre-SATA is doesn't even have S.M.A.R.T. so I'm totally lost on how to fix this. I mean the best remedy would be to get a new computer and migrate the stored information (something like this is on the way) but currently I don't have access to any of the disks at all and to make matters worse no NTP or DNS server as I was running these services on the same machine or TFTP boot server for my IP phones. - I do run multiboot UNIX on my notebook so Bind9 is naturally installed hence me writing this but I only activate in emergencies. I mean one way I thought of for fixing this would be to grab a USB -> ATA/SATA adapter: http://www.startech.com/product/USB2SATAIDE-USB-20-to-IDE-or-SATA-Adapter-Cable and hook the drives up to both Linux and FreeBSD in my notebook and copy the information across to the new system when it arrives in a few months. Aside from that is there anyway to fix the kernel error quickly? Thanks, Kaya 1 Time(s): ata5: [ITHREAD] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 14:30:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67D61065675 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xammep@mail.ru) Received: from fallback1.mail.ru (fallback1.mail.ru [94.100.176.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057398FC17 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:30:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from f121.mail.ru (f121.mail.ru [217.69.128.80]) by fallback1.mail.ru (mPOP.Fallback_MX) with ESMTP id DEF5139A54C2 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:49:28 +0400 (MSD) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ru; s=mail; h=Message-Id:Content-Type:Reply-To:Date:Mime-Version:Subject:To:From; bh=k00V4RbwWCrFLf56Nh3QFm0Zob3TErzSNaU1NPq4WIM=; b=tK9igyuyGZYaBTqI6Sh4Joo1AA+38w4FI7GJ+HrjVt4NUxLj2ZYiP0NRNMvktDuAbcgAPrcP9BYNe3zWkO6+Ncf4N8HtoUE5x/mqgqrqFwvFr9vquWoCPxZPEKSHkR1y; Received: from mail by f121.mail.ru with local id 1QSUkh-0002DX-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:49:27 +0400 Received: from [91.206.127.119] by e.mail.ru with HTTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:49:27 +0400 From: Oleg To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [91.206.127.119] Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:49:27 +0400 Message-Id: X-Spam: Not detected X-Mras: Ok Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Benq Scanner 5000 works from time to time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Oleg List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:30:05 -0000 SGkgYWxsIQoKSSB1c2U6CkJlbnEgU2Nhbm5lciA1MDAwCnNhbmUtYmFja2VuZHMtMS4wLjIxIApG cmVlQlNEIDcuNC1TVEFCTEUKJ2Zpcm13YXJlIC9ob21lL3VzZXIvZnRwLzIwRjhWMTE5LmJpbicg aW4gc25hcHNjYW4uY29uZgoKVGhlIHByb2JsZW0gaXMgc2Nhbm5lciB3b3JrcyB1bnN0YWJsZSAo ZnJvbSB0aW1lIHRvIHRpbWUpLiBJdCB0YWtlcyBtdWx0aXBsZSBhdHRlcHRzIG9mICdzY2FuaW1h Z2UgPiBmaWxlLnBwbScgdG8gZ2V0IHRoZSBzY2FuLiBPbmx5ICdsc3VzYicgY2FuIGFsd2F5cyBz ZWUgdGhlIHNjYW5uZXIgd2hpbGUgJ3NhbmUtZmluZC1zY2FubmVyJyBhbmQgJ3NjYW5pbWFnZSAt TCcgY2FuIHNlZSBpdCBmcm9tIHRpbWUgdG8gdGltZS4KSSd2ZSB0cmllZCBjaGFuZ2luZyBmaXJt d2FyZSB0byAyMEY4VjExNi5iaW4sIDIwRjhWMTE0LmJpbiwgMjBGOFYxMTIuYmluIC0gdGhlIHBy b2JsZW0gcmVwZWF0cy4KVGhlIHNjYW5uZXIgd29ya3MgZmluZSB1bmRlciBXaW5kb3dzIDcgYW5k IExpbnV4IChTbGF4IDYuMS4yIExpdmVDRCwgc2FuZSAxLjAuMjApLCBzbyB0aGUgaGFyZHdhcmUg aXMgb2ssIHByb2JhYmx5IGl0IGlzIE9TLXJlbGF0ZWQgcHJvYmxlbS4gSW4gc2FuZSdzIFtzYW5l LWRldmVsXSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QgaSBnb3QgcmVjb21tZW5kYXRpb24gdG8gYXNrIG9uIHNvbWUg ZnJlZWJzZCBmb3J1bXMuCgpBbGwgbXkgYWN0aW9ucyBoYXZlIGJlZW4gdGVzdGVkIGluIDIgY2Fz ZXM6CjEuIHdpdGggbGlidXNiIChrZXJuZWwgd2l0aG91dCAnZGV2aWNlIHVzY2FubmVyJykgCjIu IHdpdGggdXNjYW5uZXI6CihlY2hvICdwcm9kdWN0IEFDRVJQIEFDRVJTQ0FOXzUwMDAgMHgyMGY4 IEJlbnEgNTAwMCcgPj4gL3Vzci9zcmMvc3lzL2Rldi91c2IvdXNiZGV2cyAKZWNobyAne3sgVVNC X1ZFTkRPUl9BQ0VSUCwgVVNCX1BST0RVQ1RfQUNFUlBfQUNFUlNDQU5fNTAwMCB9LCAwIH0sJyA+ PiAvdXNyL3NyYy9zeXMvZGV2L3VzYi91c2Nhbm5lci5jCnJlY29tcGlsZWQga2VybmVsIHdpdGgg J2RldmljZSB1c2Nhbm5lcicpCgpDYXNlMTogCkJlbnEgNTAwMCBwb3dlcmVkIG9uIGZpcnN0IHRp bWU6CgojIGxzdXNiCkJ1cyAvZGV2L3VzYjIgRGV2aWNlIC9kZXYvdWdlbjA6IElEIDA0YTU6MjBm OCBBY2VyIFBlcmlwaGVyYWxzIEluYy4gKG5vdyBCZW5RIENvcnAuKSBCZW5xIDUwMDAKCnNhbmUt ZmluZC1zY2FubmVyIGZvdW5kIHRoZSBzY2FubmVyIG9uIHRoZSBmb3VydGggYXR0ZW1wdDoKCiMg c2FuZS1maW5kLXNjYW5uZXIgLXEKIyBzYW5lLWZpbmQtc2Nhbm5lciAtcQojIHNhbmUtZmluZC1z Y2FubmVyIC1xCiMgc2FuZS1maW5kLXNjYW5uZXIgLXEKZm91bmQgVVNCIHNjYW5uZXIgKHZlbmRv cj0weDA0YTUgW0NvbG9yXSwgcHJvZHVjdD0weDIwZjggWyBGbGF0YmVkU2Nhbm5lciAyMl0pIGF0 IGxpYnVzYjovZGV2L3VzYjI6L2Rldi91Z2VuMAoKYW5kIHNjYW5pbWFnZSBmb3VuZCBpdCBvbiB0 aGUgdGhpcmQgYXR0ZW1wdDoKCiMgc2NhbmltYWdlIC1MCgpObyBzY2FubmVycyB3ZXJlIGlkZW50 aWZpZWQuIC4uLi4KLgouCi4KCiMgc2NhbmltYWdlIC1MCmRldmljZSBgc25hcHNjYW46bGlidXNi Oi9kZXYvdXNiMjovZGV2L3VnZW4wJyBpcyBhIEFjZXIgRmxhdGJlZFNjYW5uZXI0MiBmbGF0YmVk IHNjYW5uZXIKCmFmdGVyIDYgYXR0ZW1wdHMgb2Y6CiMgc2NhbmltYWdlIC0tcXVhbGl0eS1jYWw9 bm8gPiBpbWFnZS03LnBwbQpzY2FuaW1hZ2U6IG5vIFNBTkUgZGV2aWNlcyBmb3VuZAoKd2UgZ290 IHRoZSBzY2FuOgojIHNjYW5pbWFnZSAtLXF1YWxpdHktY2FsPW5vID4gaW1hZ2UtNy5wcG0KIwoK YW5kIG5leHQ6CiMgc2NhbmltYWdlIC1MCgpObyBzY2FubmVycyB3ZXJlIGlkZW50aWZpZWQuLi4u LgoKQW5kIGkgaGF2ZSB0byB3YWl0IHNldmVyYWwgbWludXRlcyBnZXR0aW5nIHRoaXMgZXJyb3Jz IHRvIGdldCB0aGUgbmV4dCBzY2FuLgoKQ2FzZTI6IApCZW5xIDUwMDAgcG93ZXJlZCBvbiBmaXJz dCB0aW1lIGl0IGlzIGZvdW5kIGJ5IHNhbmUtZmluZC1zY2FubmVyIGFuZCBzY2FuaW1hZ2Ugc3Vj Y2Vzc2Z1bGx5OgoKIyBzYW5lLWZpbmQtc2Nhbm5lciAtcQpmb3VuZCBVU0Igc2Nhbm5lciAodmVu ZG9yPTB4MDRhNSwgcHJvZHVjdD0weDIwZjgpIGF0IC9kZXYvdXNjYW5uZXIwCgojIHNjYW5pbWFn ZSAtTApkZXZpY2UgYHNuYXBzY2FuOi9kZXYvdXNjYW5uZXIwJyBpcyBhIEFjZXIgRmxhdGJlZFNj YW5uZXIyMiBmbGF0YmVkIHNjYW5uZXIKCiMgc2NhbmltYWdlIC0tcXVhbGl0eS1jYWw9bm8gPiBp bWFnZS0xLnBwbQpbc25hcHNjYW5dIFNjYW5uZXIgd2FybWluZyB1cCAtIHdhaXRpbmcgMzEgc2Vj b25kcy4KIwoKT0suIFdlIGdvdCB0aGUgc2Nhbi4KQWZ0ZXIgMyBtaW51dGVzOgoKIyBzY2FuaW1h Z2UgLS1xdWFsaXR5LWNhbD1ubyA+IGltYWdlLTIucHBtCgpoYW5ncyBmb3JldmVyLi4uCgpJZiBp IGtpbGwgc2NhbmltYWdlIGFuZCB1c2Ugc2FuZS1maW5kLXNjYW5uZXI6CiMgc2FuZS1maW5kLXNj YW5uZXIgLXEKIyBzYW5lLWZpbmQtc2Nhbm5lciAtcQouCi4KLgppIGhhdmUgbm90aGluZy4KCgpJ IHdvdWxkIGJlIHZlcnkgZ3JhdGVmdWwgaWYgYW55Ym9keSBwb2ludHMgbWUgb24gdGhlIHJvb3Qg b2YgdGhpcyBpbnN0YWJpbGl0eS4KVGhhbmtzIGZvciB5b3VyIHRpbWUhCgotLSAKT2xlZwoK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 15:08:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1567D106567E for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brent@beanfield.com) Received: from smtp02.beanfield.com (smtp02.beanfield.com [76.9.193.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7DE8FC0A for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:08:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No X-beanfield-mta02-MailScanner-From: brent@beanfield.com X-beanfield-mta02-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.9, required 6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90) X-beanfield-mta02-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-beanfield-mta02-MailScanner-ID: 1QSVFR-000AhI-SU Received: from [66.207.193.249] (helo=Brent-Bloxams-Mac-mini.local) by mta02.beanfield.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QSVFR-000AhI-SU for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 10:21:13 -0400 Message-ID: <4DE8EDD9.3010804@beanfield.com> Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 10:21:13 -0400 From: Brent Bloxam Organization: Beanfield Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: freebsd-update 7.0->7.4 problem: rmdir "Directory not empty" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:08:51 -0000 I'm going through the freebsd-update process to move from 7.0 to 7.4. I followed the handbook, rebooted to GENERIC and followed up with `freebsd-update install` and got the following output: > # freebsd-update install > Installing updates...rmdir: ///usr/share/man/ja: Directory not empty > rmdir: ///usr/share/man/en.ISO8859-1/cat8: Directory not empty > rmdir: ///usr/share/man/en.ISO8859-1/cat4: Directory not empty > rmdir: ///usr/share/man/cat8: Directory not empty > rmdir: ///usr/share/man/cat4: Directory not empty > done. Are these rmdir lines something to be concerned about? Should I remove them and their content? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 15:18:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922BE1065674 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:18:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkikpole@cairodurham.org) Received: from na3sys009aog114.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog114.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71708FC0C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:18:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yx0-f179.google.com ([209.85.213.179]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob114.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTej7VQu1+gUFBFauU+KNjJgXHEekfi9f@postini.com; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:18:46 PDT Received: by mail-yx0-f179.google.com with SMTP id 8so269141yxk.24 for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:18:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.156.234 with SMTP id m70mr2972156yhk.204.1307114325640; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:18:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.63.169 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 08:18:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DDEB581.9060403@comcast.net> References: <4DDEB581.9060403@comcast.net> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:18:45 -0400 Message-ID: From: Jaime Kikpole To: Steve Polyack Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dell R210 "no disks found" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:18:48 -0000 On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Steve Polyack wrote: > I'm assuming these have the PERC H200 cards in them. =A0If so, you will n= eed > the mps(4) driver which is only available in FreeBSD 8-STABLE built somet= ime > after the 8.2 release. =A0You can find ISO snapshots of 8-STABLE builds h= ere > http://pub.allbsd.org/FreeBSD-snapshots/. =A0Search the list archives for > "PERC H200" for more information. I made a DVD from the ISO and then it booted. I had to destroy the RAID array, unfortunately. It looks 8-STABLE can see the disks as /dev/da0 and /dev/da1, but it can't see the array. My next issue is this: I can use the DVD to install 8.2-RELEASE, but not 8-STABLE. However, 8.2-RELEASE can't boot, sinc eit doesn't have the driver for the HDs. Am I missing something? Thanks, Jaime Kikpole --=20 Network Administrator Cairo-Durham Central School District http://cns.cairodurham.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 19:18:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCF31065670 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 19:18:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrisom@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D8D8FC08 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 19:18:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so2551984iwn.13 for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 12:18:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=23mdFdh5uPhsGavB3ZG35LtreOxPB4KVE94/zGXlYg8=; b=x4rX+Hpvd0cTDvpJ7odJ60UZDpVrAtTkZkWw/c5jLghcMUoe4XEZR3Q6qE5TCkekut Uf0q7Lt5zwxXVQZwhyFnHQctUjULznmibIKsleERoza1d+vZLWVZWQazAXD6kALZeQ2e JnylnHQ/R5D/ScYSiY6wgsAc6XrmHNP4P4xug= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WTF6kxUHemsROXhl8OrWLC5wEnxSKfT2V+ijJNwNlYiQB1TaeeY6/juXVEUxB+kS++ 1Y6zYGcll9SDg+qAyYLljJkW8h3Q2AqcvVB4MLudkv8yBtPzlOGiNy9hNQ0jl7TquW/E e+go88Y05yj5K7KIdJeVEIf5Q/FSKRFTf3FeM= Received: by 10.42.163.138 with SMTP id c10mr4139737icy.269.1307127058957; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:50:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (c-98-212-201-29.hsd1.il.comcast.net [98.212.201.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d6sm552713ibj.6.2011.06.03.11.50.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:50:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DE92D10.1050703@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:50:56 -0500 From: Joshua Isom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Hardware sensors on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 19:18:12 -0000 I was wondering if anyone knew of better software for FreeBSD for monitoring hardware sensors like CPU temp and fan speeds. I'm using an athlon II x4 and the amdtemp driver seems like it's 20C below what it really is but does change. I've tried using mbmon and it detects the it87 chip but it never updates. It's as if whatever temps it finds at boot are what it'll always show, and the fan speed listed is a quarter of what it really is. I tried stress linux to test lmsensors to make sure it wasn't a motherboard issue and lmsensors works relatively fine. The voltages are junk but temperature seems accurate and varies with the load. I've yet to see any update about the openbsd sensors framework, and I imagine the patch is so old it won't apply cleanly. Is there a better method to monitor system health under FreeBSD or am I stuck with decade old software and a kernel driver that's off by 20C? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 21:15:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4761065686 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:15:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from levitch@iglou.com) Received: from rdsmtp.iglou.com (rdsmtp.iglou.com [192.107.41.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975E48FC18 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:15:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iglou.com; s=alpha; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=q0V3hSYtqVxt6eHhxIkBMYZaR6iMowo7YkryvXmDLkU=; b=dX5k2JYP0xbwmcqXIpbDXL7dmhn4oOpJqrrzvVSFmjtcTfEAcc88PtpYOrwunr93IF7Dw0tfLA/TDHguGj3CsAK++CvdVBXOxzgssY6ULI6bPyl9baIAJd2q6446jRnV50m5CGzeZOtqZUvXMVJQwCwkgB3H4sHmSUDQfc6GtO4=; Received: from iglou1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.3]:63653 helo=mail.iglou.com) by rdsmtp.iglou.com with esmtpa (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1QSbB4-0006lB-CK by authid with igloumta_auth for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:41:06 -0400 Received: from shell1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.17]:33351 helo=shell1) by mail.iglou.com with esmtps (TLS cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1QSbB3-0001wl-Tu for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:41:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:41:05 -0400 (EDT) From: levitch@iglou.com X-X-Sender: levitch@shell1 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Originating-IP: 192.107.41.17 X-IgLou-Customer: 3cb6f76205bd20f518810676a67a982b Subject: failure to create zfs storage pool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:15:47 -0000 Hello, After getting a couple of Hitachi 1T 7200 rpm drives, it seemed like time for ZFS on FreeBSD82, having not had Z file system subsequent to retiring whatever OpenSolaris was around. Basically, I followed this article: /doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/remote-install/installation.html Previous to this, I had been using sysinstall. dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad4 count=2 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad6 count=2 fdisk -BI ad4 fdisk -BI ad6 bsdlabel -wB /dev/ad4s1 bsdlabel -wB /dev/ad6s1 ------------------------------------------------- bsdlabel -e /dev/ad4s1 a: 1G 16 4.2BSD 1024 8192 0 b: 5G * swap c: blah,blah d: 20G * 4.2BSD 2048 16384 0 e: 20G * 4.2BSD 2048 16384 0 f: * * unused 0 0 ------------------------------------------------- bsdlabel /dev/ad4s1 > /tmp/bsdlabel.txt && bsdlabel -R \ /dev/ad6s1 /tmp/bsdlabel.txt Now it was way past midnight, I cannot recall but might have run this: gmirror label -nb round-robin gm0 ad4s1 ad6s1 I ran these: gmirror label root ad4s1a ad6s1a gmirror label var ad4s1d ad6s1d gmirror label usr ad4s1e ad6s1e gmirror label -F swap ad4s1b ad6s1b gmirror load newfs -b 8192 -f 1024 /dev/mirror/root newfs /dev/mirror/var newfs /dev/mirror/usr mount /dev/mirror/root /mnt mkdir /mnt/var /mnt/usr mount /dev/mirror/var /mnt/var mount /dev/mirror/usr /mnt/usr So I got the files with 'ftp passive' and followed the article all to the 'reboot' command. Seemed okay. Now at the next page of the article: /doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/remote-install/zfs.html Having read several articles and the zpool manual page, I still have failed to create any kind of ZFS storage pool. Darrel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 23:13:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265B21065670 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:13:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070138FC13 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p53NDYit022655 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:13:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p53NDYIB022654; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:13:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA19912; Fri, 3 Jun 11 16:00:45 PDT Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:00:43 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: kayasaman@gmail.com Message-Id: <4de9679b.AE3DPW9jNqVtiL2D%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4DE8CF13.1040304@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4DE8CF13.1040304@gmail.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange system lockups - kernel saying disk error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:13:49 -0000 Kaya Saman wrote: > I have an ancient pre-HT PIV machine with <500MB RAM. > ... > Everything was running fine until round about 2 days > ago when the system started locking up on me? > > ... is there anyway to fix the kernel error quickly? Did you apply any updates shortly before it started to fail? If not, this is likely to be a hardware problem. I'd suggest checking the power supply and the fans, running memtest86, and taking a close look at the electrolytic filter capacitors on the system board -- the last because it sounds as if this system may be about the right age to have been built with some bad ones. (If any of the capacitors are bulging, either those caps, or the entire board, need to be replaced.) Power and heat problems can cause all sorts of strange symptoms. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 23:17:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458681065672 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:17:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@socket.net) Received: from mf1.socket.net (mf1.socket.net [216.106.88.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A0918FC13 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:17:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [216.106.88.17]) by mf1.socket.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 2EC0345933 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:17:39 -0500 (CDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jhall@socket.net X-Apparently-from: jhall@mail.socket.net X-Remote-Host: 216.106.31.249 User-Agent: Socket WebMail Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:17:39 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20110603231740.458681065672@hub.freebsd.org> Subject: Installing a root certificate in openssl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jhall@socket.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:17:40 -0000 I am attempting to get TLS with Postfix working and I have run into a problem and nothing I have tried seems to resolve the problem. When a TLS connection is started, I see the following in /var/log/maillog Jun 3 17:38:13 mo-bak-s1 postfix/smtp[41281]: certificate verification failed for abc.org.s9a1.def.com[WW.XX.YY.ZZ]:25: untrusted issuer /C=US/O=Equifax/OU=Equifax Secure Certificate Authority I have downloaded the Equifax Secure Certificate Authority.cer, converted it to PEM format. Then, I added the certificate to my certfile and restarted Postfix. I had the same result. My guess is that I am doing something wrong importing the Equifax certificate. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Have a nice weekend. Thanks for your help. Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 01:18:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3180F106564A for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 01:18:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yi0-f54.google.com (mail-yi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB93B8FC14 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 01:18:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yie12 with SMTP id 12so1498468yie.13 for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:18:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.207.30 with SMTP id j30mr1776102anq.86.1307150302876; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:18:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (twdp-174-109-142-001.nc.res.rr.com [174.109.142.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b25sm1544708anb.20.2011.06.03.18.18.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:18:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3QmPYm3k96z2CG44 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:18:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:18:19 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20110603211819.52f7dd62@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20110603231740.458681065672@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20110603231740.458681065672@hub.freebsd.org> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Installing a root certificate in openssl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 01:18:24 -0000 On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:17:39 -0500 jhall@socket.net articulated: > I am attempting to get TLS with Postfix working and I have run into a > problem and nothing I have tried seems to resolve the problem. > > When a TLS connection is started, I see the following > in /var/log/maillog > > Jun 3 17:38:13 mo-bak-s1 postfix/smtp[41281]: certificate > verification failed for abc.org.s9a1.def.com[WW.XX.YY.ZZ]:25: > untrusted issuer /C=US/O=Equifax/OU=Equifax Secure Certificate > Authority > > I have downloaded the Equifax Secure Certificate Authority.cer, > converted it to PEM format. Then, I added the certificate to my > certfile and restarted Postfix. I had the same result. > > My guess is that I am doing something wrong importing the Equifax > certificate. > > Any suggestions would be appreciated. Have a nice weekend. Did you run: "c_rehash" on the file? In any event, this is probably best asked on the Postfix forum. Follow the directions located here for best results: ; particularly those under: Reporting problems to postfix-users@postfix.org -- Jerry ✌ jerry+fbsd@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or ignored. Do not CC this poster. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 07:52:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC79A1065670 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 07:52:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kayasaman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486D48FC0A for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 07:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so2550880wyf.13 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 00:52:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9X3ur6GS5puiL0/dYwLUspCHeBUSCDDXMn5NG+Rr4qU=; b=iDLAecJB53XNIMyFlai6Qwixq2JSiMi9NADxGmw0aH8EYB9SjwXPV9BfizrXnsz8sm uLcRwkzr004ct+gewUG7R7P0f0/38gWZce677Ar3Mua2ywqhEges7KQnpS0YF/iSR+zC fkMJwPTx0nqv80Gs16L30n/7XKqHMwjAyJSDo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Cv3Xhkb0EOuQ9ZfPJ3EihZ40qgcYNU62SRdnCECIz7K+6TkJjslFfOGsu6RU2uvM/k EC9zm5tY17xnu8Vo3TAqN659GwR71IaKY9p9BTA58eapu9agdABDZqGQJhPSJ8llybS9 6+zbeeUNnQLVb9MQLCTsMS1HO6963LakAV/2M= Received: by 10.216.68.2 with SMTP id k2mr268498wed.90.1307173972146; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 00:52:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.16.0.3] ([78.186.130.149]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o19sm1503361wbh.4.2011.06.04.00.52.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 04 Jun 2011 00:52:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DE9E44E.3080707@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 10:52:46 +0300 From: Kaya Saman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: perryh@pluto.rain.com References: <4DE8CF13.1040304@gmail.com> <4de9679b.AE3DPW9jNqVtiL2D%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4de9679b.AE3DPW9jNqVtiL2D%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange system lockups - kernel saying disk error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 07:52:53 -0000 Many thanks for the response! On 06/04/2011 02:00 AM, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Kaya Saman wrote: > > >> I have an ancient pre-HT PIV machine with<500MB RAM. >> ... >> Everything was running fine until round about 2 days >> ago when the system started locking up on me? >> >> ... is there anyway to fix the kernel error quickly? >> > Did you apply any updates shortly before it started to fail? > No updates! I did however, install unrar through ports. > If not, this is likely to be a hardware problem. I'd suggest > checking the power supply and the fans, running memtest86, and > taking a close look at the electrolytic filter capacitors on > the system board -- the last because it sounds as if this system > may be about the right age to have been built with some bad ones. > (If any of the capacitors are bulging, either those caps, or the > entire board, need to be replaced.) Power and heat problems can > cause all sorts of strange symptoms. > I guess, I mean I did mention that the system was old and also I've been running in 24/7 online for the past year and half as this box got passed down to me by a family member. It has a Gigabyte system board. Not sure about the capacitors; I'll check. I remember on other boards that went on me in the past with capacitor issues, a bunch of orange stuff starts leaking out of them when they blow up. Also the chassis doesn't have any cooling fans either since it was bought extremely cheaply by the family member but not sure that's the culprit neither power problems as the system has run in high outside ambient temps in the past with no A/C in the room and also was working fine on the PSU installed with the 4 disks. I guess it's hardware related somehow as something's blown up, either the PSU, system board or so...... As I explained in the beginning if there's no clear way to fix the problem easily then I'll wait a bit. - I have a 16 disk Promise DAS on the way and will build a server using a Chenbro industrial rack chassis and Supermicro AMD based 8-12 core system board. These systems will fit better in the 2 racks I have in my living room. This should be a bit more stable and also give me higher capacity too! Regards, Kaya From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 08:14:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D3DC1065672 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 08:14:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6A38FC08 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 08:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so1564669gxk.13 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 01:14:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ASBYdd8FjrbbMBqTeqfTPRs+QmP4UV2S1Vry6Ofby5I=; b=CuF7vTTeAW0Wl88hbReLJIT6EQXXYTeXjWwFvtl0GhdSWKihRuWfBzJthgngwO0ctO 0m9MpMyNgxW1Kd7qN1p34780NHqp2Nf3Qynvhac1r9RQw4587ZSmXngGFvCAc4pRvI14 rvhJzNTRKM02+GVS7E5ISr9nTnXDcQXL5lMmA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=VUvF/p0RX3kT1bkradEKAMTLZ6cqONFDCsBcrUzrxqOJMt8eITKpiukq1V0ia1qHHJ wKQD6F3FtWziNCAEapN0iLqw4dck2wCDB2KuJlKZbewElns/krTFMPN9371rps4PgjYi Am5vihYErNbBjedXY8ngCc9vCq4Iv6EZQ0J7k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.202.67 with SMTP id c43mr3768611yho.80.1307175239453; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 01:13:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.136.167 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 01:13:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 09:13:59 +0100 Message-ID: From: krad To: levitch@iglou.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: failure to create zfs storage pool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 08:14:02 -0000 On 3 June 2011 21:41, wrote: > Hello, > > After getting a couple of Hitachi 1T 7200 rpm drives, it seemed > like time for ZFS on FreeBSD82, having not had Z file system > subsequent to retiring whatever OpenSolaris was around. > > Basically, I followed this article: > > /doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/remote-install/installation.html > > Previous to this, I had been using sysinstall. > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad4 count=2 > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad6 count=2 > > fdisk -BI ad4 > fdisk -BI ad6 > > bsdlabel -wB /dev/ad4s1 > bsdlabel -wB /dev/ad6s1 > > ------------------------------------------------- > bsdlabel -e /dev/ad4s1 > > a: 1G 16 4.2BSD 1024 8192 0 > b: 5G * swap > c: blah,blah > d: 20G * 4.2BSD 2048 16384 0 > e: 20G * 4.2BSD 2048 16384 0 > f: * * unused 0 0 > ------------------------------------------------- > > bsdlabel /dev/ad4s1 > /tmp/bsdlabel.txt && bsdlabel -R \ > /dev/ad6s1 /tmp/bsdlabel.txt > > Now it was way past midnight, I cannot recall but might have run > this: > > gmirror label -nb round-robin gm0 ad4s1 ad6s1 > > I ran these: > > gmirror label root ad4s1a ad6s1a > gmirror label var ad4s1d ad6s1d > gmirror label usr ad4s1e ad6s1e > gmirror label -F swap ad4s1b ad6s1b > gmirror load > > newfs -b 8192 -f 1024 /dev/mirror/root > newfs /dev/mirror/var > newfs /dev/mirror/usr > > mount /dev/mirror/root /mnt > mkdir /mnt/var /mnt/usr > mount /dev/mirror/var /mnt/var > mount /dev/mirror/usr /mnt/usr > > So I got the files with 'ftp passive' and followed the article all > to the 'reboot' command. Seemed okay. > > Now at the next page of the article: > > /doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/remote-install/zfs.html > > Having read several articles and the zpool manual page, I still > have failed to create any kind of ZFS storage pool. > > Darrel > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > are you trying to do zfs root or just have a freebsd system with a zpool? You could take the real easy way of getting zfsroot, and install freebsd via pc-bsd install cd and that would do all the hard work From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 08:31:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BFB8106564A for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 08:31:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DAB8FC13 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 08:31:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gamma.wifi.locolomo.org (gamma.wifi.locolomo.org [172.16.1.5]) by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C9011C0841 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 10:31:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4DE9ED56.9020504@locolomo.org> Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 10:31:18 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "questions@FreeBSD.org Questions" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Where's my disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 08:31:21 -0000 Hi: I'm moving my server to new hardware, but I will preserve the disk making the necessary changes to the configuration before the move. The first problem is that I have no idea how my disk will be recognized, now the root partition is on /dev/ad6s1a. The second problem is that the server is headless. I pretty much have to guess and remember. I have no way of knowing if a command was successful. oh, and the third problem is that this new one uses a USB keyboard and I only have a PS2 keyboard. This means that I need to figure out how the hard disk will be recognized so it will be mounted properly at first attempt. Or else have to go out investing in a lot of extra hardware. Any trick for doing this? Thanks, Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 08:48:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A67A106564A for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 08:48:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD008FC13 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 08:48:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-63-204.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.63.204]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938143C95C; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 10:48:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id p548mCI1003815; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 10:48:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 10:48:12 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Erik =?ISO-8859-1?Q?N=F8rgaard?= Message-Id: <20110604104812.dfbf2888.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4DE9ED56.9020504@locolomo.org> References: <4DE9ED56.9020504@locolomo.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "questions@FreeBSD.org Questions" Subject: Re: Where's my disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 08:48:15 -0000 On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 10:31:18 +0200, Erik N=F8rgaard = wrote: > The first problem is that I have no idea how my disk will be recognized,= =20 > now the root partition is on /dev/ad6s1a. A good approach is to apply a label or use the UFSID of the partitions (which don't depend on controller position) instead of the device names. > The second problem is that the server is headless. I pretty much have to= =20 > guess and remember. I have no way of knowing if a command was successful. Maybe you have the chance to prepare access with a serial terminal (real one or per terminal emulator)? > oh, and the third problem is that this new one uses a USB keyboard and I= =20 > only have a PS2 keyboard. The kernel will detect it and attach it to the ukbd driver, together with the kbdmuxer you should be able to just use it, even if an AT style PS/2 keyboard interface is present on the system (but without the possibility to connect a keyboard). --=20 Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 09:12:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5F1106564A for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 09:12:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A402B8FC1C for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 09:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gamma.wifi.locolomo.org (gamma.wifi.locolomo.org [172.16.1.5]) by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8CF0E1C0841; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:12:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4DE9F6FC.7060705@locolomo.org> Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:12:28 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <4DE9ED56.9020504@locolomo.org> <20110604104812.dfbf2888.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20110604104812.dfbf2888.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "questions@FreeBSD.org Questions" Subject: Re: Where's my disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 09:12:30 -0000 On 4/6/11 10:48 AM, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 10:31:18 +0200, Erik Nørgaard wrote: >> The first problem is that I have no idea how my disk will be recognized, >> now the root partition is on /dev/ad6s1a. > > A good approach is to apply a label or use the UFSID of > the partitions (which don't depend on controller position) > instead of the device names. Thanks, I tried to add labels, and all file systems are labeled, except the root file system, it gives an error alpha# tunefs -L root /dev/ad6s1a tunefs: /dev/ad6s1a: failed to write superblock Can I use the fsid in fstab? alpha# mount -v /dev/ad6s1a on / (ufs, local, fsid c18a2f44f29adbc0) devfs on /dev (devfs, local, multilabel, fsid 00ff000606000000) /dev/ufs/local on /usr/local (ufs, local, fsid c58a2f44da5dfaa7) /dev/ufs/var on /var (ufs, local, fsid c98a2f44462bb250) /dev/ufs/tmp on /tmp (ufs, local, fsid d38a2f44b88ac8e5) /dev/ufs/home on /home (ufs, local, fsid d58a2f449675649f) /dev/ufs/share on /home/share (ufs, local, fsid e28a2f4464800a20) devfs on /var/named/dev (devfs, local, multilabel, fsid 01ff000606000000) As for the screen I've usually done without, I know my system well, but if the disk moves, I'm lost. For the keyboard, maybe a PS2 to USB adapter? Thanks, Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 09:36:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C642106564A for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 09:36:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003578FC17 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 09:36:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-63-204.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.63.204]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615721D9E8; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:36:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id p549aF56003961; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:36:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:36:15 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Erik =?ISO-8859-1?Q?N=F8rgaard?= Message-Id: <20110604113615.61f59d5b.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4DE9F6FC.7060705@locolomo.org> References: <4DE9ED56.9020504@locolomo.org> <20110604104812.dfbf2888.freebsd@edvax.de> <4DE9F6FC.7060705@locolomo.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "questions@FreeBSD.org Questions" Subject: Re: Where's my disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 09:36:18 -0000 On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:12:28 +0200, Erik N=F8rgaard = wrote: > Thanks, I tried to add labels, and all file systems are labeled, except=20 > the root file system, it gives an error >=20 > alpha# tunefs -L root /dev/ad6s1a > tunefs: /dev/ad6s1a: failed to write superblock >=20 > Can I use the fsid in fstab? >=20 > alpha# mount -v > /dev/ad6s1a on / (ufs, local, fsid c18a2f44f29adbc0) > devfs on /dev (devfs, local, multilabel, fsid 00ff000606000000) > /dev/ufs/local on /usr/local (ufs, local, fsid c58a2f44da5dfaa7) > /dev/ufs/var on /var (ufs, local, fsid c98a2f44462bb250) > /dev/ufs/tmp on /tmp (ufs, local, fsid d38a2f44b88ac8e5) > /dev/ufs/home on /home (ufs, local, fsid d58a2f449675649f) > /dev/ufs/share on /home/share (ufs, local, fsid e28a2f4464800a20) > devfs on /var/named/dev (devfs, local, multilabel, fsid 01ff000606000000) That should work (as the kernel supports this feature or the corresponding module has been loaded). Maybe you can check this in the "old setting"? > As for the screen I've usually done without, I know my system well, but=20 > if the disk moves, I'm lost. For the keyboard, maybe a PS2 to USB adapter? If you have a USB keyboard, you can directly use that - after the kernel has come up, the keyboard can be used. PRIOR to that point, it may needed to enable some kind of "USB keyboard legacy support" in the BIOS / CMOS setup. I'm using a native USB keyboard here (Sun Type 7) which can't be used until the kernel loads ukbd; for emergency purposes, I still have to attach a regular PS/2 keyboard to the powerless system... or use the HIL plug to plug the keyboard cord into the keyboard - yes, it's an IBM model M. :-) An adapter from PS/2 to USB (if you don't have a USB, but a PS/2 keyboard) should also work. I have a cheap one (from China) here, works very good. But as I mentioned, it's also possible to make FreeBSD booting to and accessing from a serial console, no matter if you use a real serial terminal (e. g. DEC vt100), a laptop with a serial cable and a terminal program (e. g. cu), or a means to connect to the serial port that provides telnet access (such devices are often found in datacenters, and some of them allow accessing a system's serial console through a web interface). In the past, I had some headless Sun boxes (Sparcs and Ultras) that I connected to using a real serial terminal - fully sufficient, used less than once per year. :-) --=20 Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 10:44:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE8D106564A for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 10:44:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from levitch@iglou.com) Received: from rdsmtp.iglou.com (rdsmtp.iglou.com [192.107.41.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99608FC12 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 10:44:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iglou.com; s=alpha; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Subject:cc:To:From:Date; bh=q4lhB2+YzxVnh5kYsAkUyjQu4VNZDK7ePsyPYCm6dTs=; b=g/FNjNqWtcx8fvWZAsye7Y2crM1kgMCEhTC04lzHmUOVRCbHcbaNllw4fyDpLdqUF9zMSicsBebdaAaw0RURycqLVk/dJHbVzvxGI7a3uwXzYdbbHl2Wc5iIpI62moTb71qMSRTLZz+sDbDgfhShwGU8u41EJVqCE3SL4+IxibA=; Received: from iglou3.iglou.com ([192.107.41.6]:53740 helo=mail.iglou.com) by rdsmtp.iglou.com with esmtpa (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1QSoLC-0006sW-PF by authid with igloumta_auth for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 06:44:26 -0400 Received: from shell1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.17]:35481 helo=shell1) by mail.iglou.com with esmtps (TLS cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1QSoLC-0005Ze-5H; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 06:44:26 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 06:44:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Darrel X-X-Sender: levitch@shell1 To: krad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Originating-IP: 192.107.41.17 X-IgLou-Customer: 3cb6f76205bd20f518810676a67a982b Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: failure to create zfs storage pool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 10:44:28 -0000 >> After getting a couple of Hitachi 1T 7200 rpm drives, it seemed >> like time for ZFS on FreeBSD82, having not had Z file system >> subsequent to retiring whatever OpenSolaris was around. >> >> Basically, I followed this article: >> >> /doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/remote-install/installation.html >> >> Previous to this, I had been using sysinstall. >> >> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad4 count=2 >> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad6 count=2 >> >> fdisk -BI ad4 >> fdisk -BI ad6 >> >> bsdlabel -wB /dev/ad4s1 >> bsdlabel -wB /dev/ad6s1 >> >> ------------------------------------------------- >> bsdlabel -e /dev/ad4s1 >> >> a: 1G 16 4.2BSD 1024 8192 0 >> b: 5G * swap >> c: blah,blah >> d: 20G * 4.2BSD 2048 16384 0 >> e: 20G * 4.2BSD 2048 16384 0 >> f: * * unused 0 0 >> ------------------------------------------------- >> >> bsdlabel /dev/ad4s1 > /tmp/bsdlabel.txt && bsdlabel -R \ >> /dev/ad6s1 /tmp/bsdlabel.txt >> >> Now it was way past midnight, I cannot recall but might have run >> this: >> >> gmirror label -nb round-robin gm0 ad4s1 ad6s1 >> >> I ran these: >> >> gmirror label root ad4s1a ad6s1a >> gmirror label var ad4s1d ad6s1d >> gmirror label usr ad4s1e ad6s1e >> gmirror label -F swap ad4s1b ad6s1b >> gmirror load >> >> newfs -b 8192 -f 1024 /dev/mirror/root >> newfs /dev/mirror/var >> newfs /dev/mirror/usr >> >> mount /dev/mirror/root /mnt >> mkdir /mnt/var /mnt/usr >> mount /dev/mirror/var /mnt/var >> mount /dev/mirror/usr /mnt/usr >> >> So I got the files with 'ftp passive' and followed the article all >> to the 'reboot' command. Seemed okay. >> >> Now at the next page of the article: >> >> /doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/remote-install/zfs.html >> >> Having read several articles and the zpool manual page, I still >> have failed to create any kind of ZFS storage pool. >> > > > are you trying to do zfs root or just have a freebsd system with a zpool? > > You could take the real easy way of getting zfsroot, and install freebsd via > pc-bsd install cd and that would do all the hard work > Having mirrored SATA disks with a simple zpool on FreeBSD was the original goal. Thank you for the idea. I can not think of any reason not to have zfs root. What is a drag is that I have already built a new kernel and just this morning already ran portsnap fetch and extract. Perhaps this might also be an opportunity to learn gpart and geom as well, limiting usage of fdisk, bsdlabel, and sysinstall moving forward. Darrel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 11:22:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7192B106564A for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:22:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B6C8FC08 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:22:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p54BEPrh015922; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 12:14:25 +0100 Received: from orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (80-45-152-196.static.dsl.as9105.com [80.45.152.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p54BEOYA015915; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 12:14:24 +0100 Received: by orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 290C633C52; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 12:22:12 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 12:22:12 +0100 From: Frank Shute To: Brent Bloxam Message-ID: <20110604112212.GA34129@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <4DE8EDD9.3010804@beanfield.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DE8EDD9.3010804@beanfield.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE amd64 X-Organisation: 'shute.org.uk' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update 7.0->7.4 problem: rmdir "Directory not empty" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:22:17 -0000 --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 10:21:13AM -0400, Brent Bloxam wrote: > > I'm going through the freebsd-update process to move from 7.0 to 7.4. I= =20 > followed the handbook, rebooted to GENERIC and followed up with=20 > `freebsd-update install` and got the following output: >=20 > ># freebsd-update install > >Installing updates...rmdir: ///usr/share/man/ja: Directory not empty > >rmdir: ///usr/share/man/en.ISO8859-1/cat8: Directory not empty > >rmdir: ///usr/share/man/en.ISO8859-1/cat4: Directory not empty > >rmdir: ///usr/share/man/cat8: Directory not empty > >rmdir: ///usr/share/man/cat4: Directory not empty > > done. >=20 > Are these rmdir lines something to be concerned about? Should I remove=20 > them and their content? I wouldn't worry too much about that. I've still got those dirs on my 7.3 machine. The worst case scenario, I think, is that you may have some old manpages lying around. Regards, --=20 Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk3qFWMACgkQHduKvUAgeK4zUQCeNKk4oYeQ1mgnPHFFYhx5+Un9 PRIAoM+JaSabVxsCoEDAi5Y/vG7BNNVa =LtnY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 11:25:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083F3106566C for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:25:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986338FC12 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:25:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so2389471wwc.31 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 04:25:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.69.194 with SMTP id a2mr2866205wbj.57.1307186735285; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 04:25:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.47] (paris.c-mal.com [88.170.200.60]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m8sm1591416wbh.62.2011.06.04.04.25.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 04 Jun 2011 04:25:34 -0700 (PDT) References: <4DDEB581.9060403@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8J2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <155048F0-4EF5-46EA-AC04-DFA0C999D8EA@my.gd> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8J2) From: Damien Fleuriot Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 13:25:26 +0200 To: Jaime Kikpole Cc: Steve Polyack , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Dell R210 "no disks found" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:25:37 -0000 On 3 Jun 2011, at 17:18, Jaime Kikpole wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Steve Polyack wrote:= >> I'm assuming these have the PERC H200 cards in them. If so, you will nee= d >> the mps(4) driver which is only available in FreeBSD 8-STABLE built somet= ime >> after the 8.2 release. You can find ISO snapshots of 8-STABLE builds her= e >> http://pub.allbsd.org/FreeBSD-snapshots/. Search the list archives for >> "PERC H200" for more information. >=20 > I made a DVD from the ISO and then it booted. I had to destroy the > RAID array, unfortunately. It looks 8-STABLE can see the disks as > /dev/da0 and /dev/da1, but it can't see the array. >=20 This is both normal and excpected, at this point in time the mps driver can'= t work with h200's hard raid. > My next issue is this: I can use the DVD to install 8.2-RELEASE, but > not 8-STABLE. However, 8.2-RELEASE can't boot, sinc eit doesn't have > the driver for the HDs. Am I missing something? >=20 You need to get mfsbsd by Martin Matuska. Then, prepare a 8.2 world along with the kernel containing the mps driver an= d/or module. Once your image is done, install a dummy Linux on your box. Next, inject your mfsbsd image in the disks with dd , and reboot. Once you reboot you'll have a fully functional bsd running from ram. You will then be able to perform a manual install as I roughly describe here= : http://my.gd/bsd.htm(l) You will also need, once your install is done, to recopy a kernel including t= he mps driver, seeing the one from the 8.2 isos doesn't. > Thanks, > Jaime Kikpole >=20 > --=20 > Network Administrator > Cairo-Durham Central School District > http://cns.cairodurham.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 11:28:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48760106566C for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:28:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7218FC08 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:28:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwk4 with SMTP id 4so269198wwk.1 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 04:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.239.68 with SMTP id b46mr2869466wer.38.1307186883683; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 04:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.47] (paris.c-mal.com [88.170.200.60]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o75sm1282074weq.40.2011.06.04.04.28.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 04 Jun 2011 04:28:02 -0700 (PDT) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8J2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <1700D703-4C8A-4793-9FCB-F792CCE4C646@my.gd> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8J2) From: Damien Fleuriot Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 13:27:56 +0200 To: "levitch@iglou.com" Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: failure to create zfs storage pool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:28:05 -0000 On 3 Jun 2011, at 22:41, levitch@iglou.com wrote: > Hello, >=20 > After getting a couple of Hitachi 1T 7200 rpm drives, it seemed > like time for ZFS on FreeBSD82, having not had Z file system > subsequent to retiring whatever OpenSolaris was around. >=20 > Basically, I followed this article: >=20 > /doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/remote-install/installation.html >=20 > Previous to this, I had been using sysinstall. >=20 > dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3D/dev/ad4 count=3D2 > dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3D/dev/ad6 count=3D2 >=20 > fdisk -BI ad4 > fdisk -BI ad6 >=20 > bsdlabel -wB /dev/ad4s1 > bsdlabel -wB /dev/ad6s1 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------- > bsdlabel -e /dev/ad4s1 >=20 > a: 1G 16 4.2BSD 1024 8192 0 > b: 5G * swap > c: blah,blah > d: 20G * 4.2BSD 2048 16384 0 > e: 20G * 4.2BSD 2048 16384 0 > f: * * unused 0 0 > ------------------------------------------------- >=20 > bsdlabel /dev/ad4s1 > /tmp/bsdlabel.txt && bsdlabel -R \ > /dev/ad6s1 /tmp/bsdlabel.txt >=20 > Now it was way past midnight, I cannot recall but might have run > this: >=20 > gmirror label -nb round-robin gm0 ad4s1 ad6s1 >=20 > I ran these: >=20 > gmirror label root ad4s1a ad6s1a > gmirror label var ad4s1d ad6s1d > gmirror label usr ad4s1e ad6s1e > gmirror label -F swap ad4s1b ad6s1b > gmirror load >=20 > newfs -b 8192 -f 1024 /dev/mirror/root > newfs /dev/mirror/var > newfs /dev/mirror/usr >=20 > mount /dev/mirror/root /mnt > mkdir /mnt/var /mnt/usr > mount /dev/mirror/var /mnt/var > mount /dev/mirror/usr /mnt/usr >=20 > So I got the files with 'ftp passive' and followed the article all > to the 'reboot' command. Seemed okay. >=20 > Now at the next page of the article: >=20 > /doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/remote-install/zfs.html >=20 > Having read several articles and the zpool manual page, I still > have failed to create any kind of ZFS storage pool. >=20 > Darrel > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" How about you scrape the gmirror altogether and use ZFS's mirror instead ? This way, you could also use the whole disks for ZFs instead of having to cr= eate labels and slices...= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 12:13:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0675B106566B for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 12:13:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD618FC13 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 12:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so2412133wwc.31 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 05:13:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xLhmfVB97iKhS5h2nUatUmtEQ/pssHUwK7rdR5EHlDI=; b=djVTa+Zy3tewtJQ+wpt0zIQlHLig9909jm3/mb02kiT0Jobl/n3FFxI11bncq7gGu4 /ag8al1T4yPnSbnMFlE1BsnwuZQ9mNp3/AOoYGl+4f65RnnC4P7yLPWwnkvA3JeAMeu1 Xb2CiU3xpQgFQcc5YVen64ZLkBqI/v/tXwCV4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fWwpHvhLQLTBDkaa2r7rl9rPwUdZMD04a1pU9hjkYXTmnG0O4+P4DBekokQ1CYC1vk L9gptsQblvA2R0nKZvwJCmtKYbc+gw1TG73oEVOAfmRcYxFvUgoGj3jAuhjZbgAzUIBr QAP4KS/86cwP05QHxqLhZmmqLas+rQ/Bbe+bo= Received: by 10.227.205.14 with SMTP id fo14mr2921786wbb.79.1307189611271; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 05:13:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d19sm1617536wbh.8.2011.06.04.05.13.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 04 Jun 2011 05:13:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 13:13:26 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110604131326.74141ad8@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20110604104812.dfbf2888.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <4DE9ED56.9020504@locolomo.org> <20110604104812.dfbf2888.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Where's my disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 12:13:33 -0000 On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 10:48:12 +0200 Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 10:31:18 +0200, Erik N=F8rgaard > wrote: > > The first problem is that I have no idea how my disk will be > > recognized, now the root partition is on /dev/ad6s1a. >=20 > A good approach is to apply a label or use the UFSID of > the partitions (which don't depend on controller position) > instead of the device names. Additionally do a swapoff and use "glabel label" to label any swap partitions. Don't forget to update fstab before doing a swapon or rebooting or you might overwrite the label.=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 13:09:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25136106566B for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 13:09:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D950A8FC15 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 13:09:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p54D9sJd032162; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 07:09:54 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p54D9s5G032159; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 07:09:54 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 07:09:54 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= In-Reply-To: <4DE9F6FC.7060705@locolomo.org> Message-ID: References: <4DE9ED56.9020504@locolomo.org> <20110604104812.dfbf2888.freebsd@edvax.de> <4DE9F6FC.7060705@locolomo.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-902635197-1807335974-1307192994=:32054" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 04 Jun 2011 07:09:54 -0600 (MDT) Cc: "questions@FreeBSD.org Questions" , Polytropon Subject: Re: Where's my disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:09:58 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---902635197-1807335974-1307192994=:32054 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Erik Nørgaard wrote: > On 4/6/11 10:48 AM, Polytropon wrote: >> On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 10:31:18 +0200, Erik Nørgaard >> wrote: >>> The first problem is that I have no idea how my disk will be recognized, >>> now the root partition is on /dev/ad6s1a. >> >> A good approach is to apply a label or use the UFSID of >> the partitions (which don't depend on controller position) >> instead of the device names. > > Thanks, I tried to add labels, and all file systems are labeled, except the > root file system, it gives an error > > alpha# tunefs -L root /dev/ad6s1a > tunefs: /dev/ad6s1a: failed to write superblock The filesystem has to be unmounted or mounted ro to set a label. http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/labels.html ---902635197-1807335974-1307192994=:32054-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 13:16:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB835106566B for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 13:16:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9271B8FC0C for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 13:16:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gamma.wifi.locolomo.org (gamma.wifi.locolomo.org [172.16.1.5]) by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A7151C0841; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 15:16:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4DEA3035.4000206@locolomo.org> Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 15:16:37 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block References: <4DE9ED56.9020504@locolomo.org> <20110604104812.dfbf2888.freebsd@edvax.de> <4DE9F6FC.7060705@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "questions@FreeBSD.org Questions" , Polytropon Subject: Re: Where's my disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:16:39 -0000 On 4/6/11 3:09 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Erik Nørgaard wrote: >> Thanks, I tried to add labels, and all file systems are labeled, >> except the root file system, it gives an error >> >> alpha# tunefs -L root /dev/ad6s1a >> tunefs: /dev/ad6s1a: failed to write superblock > > The filesystem has to be unmounted or mounted ro to set a label. Thanks, but not enough: alpha# mount -f -o ro / alpha# mount /dev/ad6s1a on / (ufs, local, read-only) devfs on /dev (devfs, local, multilabel) /dev/ufs/local on /usr/local (ufs, local) /dev/ufs/var on /var (ufs, local) /dev/ufs/tmp on /tmp (ufs, local) /dev/ufs/home on /home (ufs, local) /dev/ufs/share on /home/share (ufs, local) devfs on /var/named/dev (devfs, local, multilabel) alpha# tunefs -L root /dev/ad6s1a tunefs: /dev/ad6s1a: failed to write superblock BR, Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 13:29:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ABA6106566C for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 13:29:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from claudiu.vasadi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D212A8FC19 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 13:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so2686014wyf.13 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 06:29:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Uo2DGbc0zdz4sUUVLzNyjb9LIU2ZPlScV1b3+KNB3hs=; b=ZnJguXuQ3pyoyq0ZchfLW2P9C1Ye6JKebTVYuv/V8wpa7djvUTdl3lx1/rpdENKRmm pBf8fDWCEdX2BhQmorIWULUwT9e4kTZmOZIuw+N/TTUgUk/ioJp1j+LOGPKfw7Y0cx2A EsOFuOpHK8c1d+S1hbHOPtU90okZLc3jcRySk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=aId2s4zbfJuGktc6a+C7SnfxBQcdL77yJZ2PPM22IyFnqn1QX9YJolQYr2AHVNht6Z CVER6I2Wf1ESwscMeKtXsSgd6lt71ktqQDHOaHPSWjgc9AOwvNnDZ21HfnY02sjG/s6O sMTunUaN134hRK4zr6gDXJdmnc69OfEafU5nI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.64.145 with SMTP id c17mr2920290wed.56.1307194168895; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 06:29:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.6.131 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 06:29:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DEA3035.4000206@locolomo.org> References: <4DE9ED56.9020504@locolomo.org> <20110604104812.dfbf2888.freebsd@edvax.de> <4DE9F6FC.7060705@locolomo.org> <4DEA3035.4000206@locolomo.org> Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 15:29:28 +0200 Message-ID: From: claudiu vasadi To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= , FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Where's my disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:29:30 -0000 Try booting into single user mode and then: # mount -u / # tunefs -L root /dev/ad6s1a # reboot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 14:50:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3D2106564A for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 14:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@vereshagin.org) Received: from mx1.skyriver.ru (ns1.skyriver.ru [89.108.118.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F698FC13 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 14:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (tor12.anonymizer.ccc.de [62.113.219.5]) by mx1.skyriver.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D8FB5AEE for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 18:26:12 +0400 (MSD) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 18:49:49 +0400 From: Peter Vereshagin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110604144949.GA5337@external.screwed.box> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: ' X-Face: 8T>{1owI$Byj]]a; ^G]kRf*dkq>E-3':F>4ODP[#X4s"dr?^b&2G@'3lukno]A1wvJ_L(~u 6>I2ra/<,j1%@C[LN=>p#_}RIV+#:KTszp-X$bQOj,K Subject: Re: perl5.12 -> perl5.14 upgrade problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 14:50:04 -0000 You're face to face with man who sold the world, freebsd-questions! 2011/06/01 17:31:13 +0200 n dhert => To freebsd-questions@freebsd.org : nd> # portupgrade -fr perl nd> make: don't know how to make nd> /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.0/mach/CORE/cc_runtime.h. nd> Stop nd> checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is nd> required for intltool nd> I DO NOT have a file /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.0/mach/CORE/cc_runtime.h nd> in the /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.0/mach/CORE directory perl-after-upgrade(1) ? 73! Peter pgp: A0E26627 (4A42 6841 2871 5EA7 52AB 12F8 0CE1 4AAC A0E2 6627) -- http://vereshagin.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 15:11:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05651065670 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 15:11:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from levitch@iglou.com) Received: from rdsmtp.iglou.com (rdsmtp.iglou.com [192.107.41.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482B78FC16 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 15:11:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iglou.com; s=alpha; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Subject:cc:To:From:Date; bh=Ij7Ols8fj+zs9LcqZSurohaURCF/HQy0bidwWuGFSw4=; b=rPJbd0lmFiAYjU2Xpz7xeYPBllBHO9r2iLp3VcIXdigvuOB0Rgbw6udIhhGWRuuMi5GIK3JJD9GTlWtRpvCC540ZFwjge5x0l2GnyQ5cDZLxTA505BrFMxKfmWG1hZoP3WwnmoYz5OXZLqq2qCUk8VNFFYwhyRfvdQ3nJpk04r4=; Received: from iglou3.iglou.com ([192.107.41.6]:60387 helo=mail.iglou.com) by rdsmtp.iglou.com with esmtpa (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1QSsVk-0001rO-Ny by authid with igloumta_auth for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:11:36 -0400 Received: from shell1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.17]:36123 helo=shell1) by mail.iglou.com with esmtps (TLS cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1QSsVj-00021h-Vm; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:11:36 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:11:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Darrel X-X-Sender: levitch@shell1 To: Damien Fleuriot In-Reply-To: <1700D703-4C8A-4793-9FCB-F792CCE4C646@my.gd> Message-ID: References: <1700D703-4C8A-4793-9FCB-F792CCE4C646@my.gd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Originating-IP: 192.107.41.17 X-IgLou-Customer: 3cb6f76205bd20f518810676a67a982b Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: failure to create zfs storage pool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 15:11:37 -0000 >> >> After getting a couple of Hitachi 1T 7200 rpm drives, it seemed >> like time for ZFS on FreeBSD82, having not had Z file system >> subsequent to retiring whatever OpenSolaris was around. >> >> Basically, I followed this article: >> >> /doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/remote-install/installation.html >> >> Previous to this, I had been using sysinstall. >> >> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad4 count=2 >> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad6 count=2 >> >> fdisk -BI ad4 >> fdisk -BI ad6 >> >> bsdlabel -wB /dev/ad4s1 >> bsdlabel -wB /dev/ad6s1 >> >> ------------------------------------------------- >> bsdlabel -e /dev/ad4s1 >> >> a: 1G 16 4.2BSD 1024 8192 0 >> b: 5G * swap >> c: blah,blah >> d: 20G * 4.2BSD 2048 16384 0 >> e: 20G * 4.2BSD 2048 16384 0 >> f: * * unused 0 0 >> ------------------------------------------------- >> >> bsdlabel /dev/ad4s1 > /tmp/bsdlabel.txt && bsdlabel -R \ >> /dev/ad6s1 /tmp/bsdlabel.txt >> >> Now it was way past midnight, I cannot recall but might have run >> this: >> >> gmirror label -nb round-robin gm0 ad4s1 ad6s1 >> >> I ran these: >> >> gmirror label root ad4s1a ad6s1a >> gmirror label var ad4s1d ad6s1d >> gmirror label usr ad4s1e ad6s1e >> gmirror label -F swap ad4s1b ad6s1b >> gmirror load >> >> newfs -b 8192 -f 1024 /dev/mirror/root >> newfs /dev/mirror/var >> newfs /dev/mirror/usr >> >> mount /dev/mirror/root /mnt >> mkdir /mnt/var /mnt/usr >> mount /dev/mirror/var /mnt/var >> mount /dev/mirror/usr /mnt/usr >> >> So I got the files with 'ftp passive' and followed the article all >> to the 'reboot' command. Seemed okay. >> >> Now at the next page of the article: >> >> /doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/remote-install/zfs.html >> >> Having read several articles and the zpool manual page, I still >> have failed to create any kind of ZFS storage pool. >> > > > How about you scrape the gmirror altogether and use ZFS's mirror instead ? > > This way, you could also use the whole disks for ZFs instead of having to create labels and slices... Well, I might even do this today. I still intend to run FreeBSD on it. So, perhaps something like this?: http://www.b0rken.org/freebsd/zfs.html Darrel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 16:38:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8467106564A for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 16:38:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@g8kbv.demon.co.uk) Received: from lon1-post-1.mail.demon.net (lon1-post-1.mail.demon.net [195.173.77.148]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09CE8FC12 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 16:38:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.225.105.201] (helo=[192.168.42.12]) by lon1-post-1.mail.demon.net with esmtpa (AUTH g8kbv) (Exim 4.69) id 1QStrk-0000Pb-Wn for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:38:24 +0000 From: "Dave" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 17:38:23 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4DEA5F7F.28256.4CD05C6A@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <4DE8CF13.1040304@gmail.com> References: <4DE8CF13.1040304@gmail.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.61) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Subject: Re: Strange system lockups - kernel saying disk error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:38:25 -0000 On 3 Jun 2011 at 15:09, Kaya Saman wrote: > Hi, > > I have an ancient pre-HT PIV machine with <500MB RAM. > > The system has an extra PCI->SATA card installed so I can make use of > modern high capacity drives. > > Everything was running fine until round about 2 days ago when the > system started locking up on me? > > > Current drive configuration for the system is: > > 40GB IDE drive as root (ad2) - UFS2 > 500GB IDE drive for storage (ad3) - EXT3 > 1TB SATA drive for storage (ad4) - UFS2 > 750GB SATA drive for storage (ad8) - EXT3 > > I had an issue with the 750GB drive which the file system seemed to > have got corrupted so I powered down and backed the information up to > a 2TB SATA drive using ddrescue and the Gentoo Linux based System > Rescue CD. I put the 2TB drive in place of the 1TB ad4 drive > physically. > > Once backed up I powered down again and re-installed the 1TB SATA > drive into ad4 position on system and completely removed the 2TB > backup. > > When booted back into FreeBSD upon boot I received this error: > > > WARNING: Kernel Errors Present > ad4: FAILURE - WRITE_DMA48 status=51 > error=4 LBA=1 ...: 1 Time(s) > g_vfs_done():ad4e[WRITE(offset=974444691456, length=16384)]error > = 5 ...: 1 Time(s) > > > The current status of the disks seemed to be ok though: > > 1 Time(s): ad2: 38166MB at ata1-master > UDMA33 1 Time(s): ad2: DMA limited to UDMA33, controller found > non-ATA66 cable 1 Time(s): ad3: 476940MB > at ata1-slave UDMA33 1 Time(s): ad3: DMA limited to UDMA33, > controller found non-ATA66 cable 1 Time(s): ad4: 953869MB HD103SJ 1AJ10001> at ata2-master SATA150 1 Time(s): ad8: > 715404MB at ata4-master SATA150 1 > Time(s): agp0: on hostb0 1 Time(s): > ata0: on atapci0 1 Time(s): ata0: [ITHREAD] 1 > Time(s): ata1: on atapci0 1 Time(s): ata1: [ITHREAD] > 1 Time(s): ata2: on atapci1 1 Time(s): ata2: > [ITHREAD] 1 Time(s): ata3: on atapci1 1 Time(s): > ata3: [ITHREAD] 1 Time(s): ata4: on atapci1 1 > Time(s): ata4: [ITHREAD] 1 Time(s): ata5: on atapci1 > > > In order to test if the error was due to disk failure I powered down > and disconnected the ad4 and ad3 disks and powered back up. > > > The system still seems to be locking on me and I can't understand why? > > > Through Google'ing a discovered a post by Jeremy Chadwick about these > kinds of errors: > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/JeremyChadwick/ATA_issues_and_troubleshooting > > however since the system board is pre-SATA is doesn't even have > S.M.A.R.T. so I'm totally lost on how to fix this. I mean the best > remedy would be to get a new computer and migrate the stored > information (something like this is on the way) but currently I don't > have access to any of the disks at all and to make matters worse no > NTP or DNS server as I was running these services on the same machine > or TFTP boot server for my IP phones. - I do run multiboot UNIX on my > notebook so Bind9 is naturally installed hence me writing this but I > only activate in emergencies. > > I mean one way I thought of for fixing this would be to grab a USB -> > ATA/SATA adapter: > > http://www.startech.com/product/USB2SATAIDE-USB-20-to-IDE-or-SATA-Adap > ter-Cable > > and hook the drives up to both Linux and FreeBSD in my notebook and > copy the information across to the new system when it arrives in a few > months. > > > Aside from that is there anyway to fix the kernel error quickly? > > > Thanks, > > > Kaya > Hmmm... No backups then? First, check the drive data cables. Many do fail with age. Some SATA types are made with Aluminium not copper, and are extremley fragile when they age. If that doenst shed some light... Take a look at http://www.grc.com/spinrite.htm Will often restore a failling drive to full use, if it's not mechanicaly damaged. It can take time though, if any sector corruption is very bad. Days, weeks, even months have been see in some cases, but if the software keeps going, it usualy does the job. It's not a Windows program, if anyting it's a DOS program, but comes with it's own FreeDOS system to boot and run from, so you don't even need an OS on the machine to test! It will work with IDE or SATA types, even over a USB adapter if needed (but then it can't access any SMART data the drive may have) but it'll run a lot slower as it won't be aware of the drive's detailed physical timing etc. I've used it on WIndows and Linux machines in anger, and the FreeBSD box when I got it (an old Gateway E-1400) to make sure the drive was healthy. It's the hard drive equivalent of Memtest86, and you know how good that is. Even if it doesn't report any problems found, often it will cause the drive to maitain things itself, improving performance as a result. Even if the recovered drive is still less than 100% happy, or some of your data is not recoverable, you can then get the rest of your data off it, onto something new, fairly sure you have a good copy. (How to you "*Know*" you have a good copy, if you just do a bitcopy of the suspect drive?) OK, so it's not free, but if it works for you once, it's paid for itself many times over. I (and others) also use it to check new drives before putting into use. Even new-out-the-box drives can have latent problems the makers have not found. This will find and flag them, preventing your OS from using bad sectors. Anyone who has ever repaired hard drives of old (the old 14" types) to component level, also physicaly changing platters and re-aligning them, will appreciate just what this program can do. If however the drive does not identify itself to the host PC correctly, chances are, it's a "Lobster" (throw it.) But if you have identical drives, swapping the electronics card can sometimes get your data back. Best Regards DaveB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 16:42:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1357F1065670 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 16:42:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@g8kbv.demon.co.uk) Received: from lon1-post-2.mail.demon.net (lon1-post-2.mail.demon.net [195.173.77.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5288FC13 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 16:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.225.105.201] (helo=[192.168.42.12]) by lon1-post-2.mail.demon.net with esmtpa (AUTH g8kbv) (Exim 4.69) id 1QStvN-0000XK-bV for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:42:09 +0000 From: "Dave" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 17:42:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4DEA6060.4158.4CD3CCC9@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <4DE9E44E.3080707@gmail.com> References: <4DE8CF13.1040304@gmail.com>, <4de9679b.AE3DPW9jNqVtiL2D%perryh@pluto.rain.com>, <4DE9E44E.3080707@gmail.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.61) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Subject: Re: Strange system lockups - kernel saying disk error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:42:11 -0000 On 4 Jun 2011 at 10:52, Kaya Saman wrote: > Many thanks for the response! > > On 06/04/2011 02:00 AM, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > Kaya Saman wrote: > > > > > >> I have an ancient pre-HT PIV machine with<500MB RAM. > >> ... > >> Everything was running fine until round about 2 days > >> ago when the system started locking up on me? > >> > >> ... is there anyway to fix the kernel error quickly? > >> > > Did you apply any updates shortly before it started to fail? > > > > No updates! I did however, install unrar through ports. > > > If not, this is likely to be a hardware problem. I'd suggest > > checking the power supply and the fans, running memtest86, and > > taking a close look at the electrolytic filter capacitors on > > the system board -- the last because it sounds as if this system may > > be about the right age to have been built with some bad ones. (If > > any of the capacitors are bulging, either those caps, or the entire > > board, need to be replaced.) Power and heat problems can cause all > > sorts of strange symptoms. > > > > I guess, I mean I did mention that the system was old and also I've > been running in 24/7 online for the past year and half as this box got > passed down to me by a family member. It has a Gigabyte system board. > Not sure about the capacitors; I'll check. I remember on other boards > that went on me in the past with capacitor issues, a bunch of orange > stuff starts leaking out of them when they blow up. > > Also the chassis doesn't have any cooling fans either since it was > bought extremely cheaply by the family member but not sure that's the > culprit neither power problems as the system has run in high outside > ambient temps in the past with no A/C in the room and also was working > fine on the PSU installed with the 4 disks. > > I guess it's hardware related somehow as something's blown up, either > the PSU, system board or so...... > > > As I explained in the beginning if there's no clear way to fix the > problem easily then I'll wait a bit. - I have a 16 disk Promise DAS on > the way and will build a server using a Chenbro industrial rack > chassis and Supermicro AMD based 8-12 core system board. These systems > will fit better in the 2 racks I have in my living room. This should > be a bit more stable and also give me higher capacity too! > > > Regards, > > > Kaya > > > Hmmm Hard drives do not like heat! Check the PSU voltages with a meter, for accuracy and ripple. Failing SMPS's can do all sorts of odd things. Capacitor problems. Been there done that. They can be changed for very low cost, other than your time. DaveB You might guess by know, I know far more about hardware than I do about software, but for the latter to run well, the former must be good. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 18:35:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205FD1065672 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 18:35:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kayasaman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997C58FC18 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 18:35:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so2586419wwc.31 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:35:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=y9jjd3JFEZqAPxbwWyDp9hJcUOmHOySljkgn8k6Fig8=; b=WnC0sJfJqAFrS9kawC+6ngToTywE9NtesDLBDgujZd+jCb5Kk+eMAciiADucPGRSoR vggSrlyh5uiSLtB8+Gu/AF5HqKjmV2QqrMDH/DOKuNEC+egCzcRpWrwrsvakE4ANNDu/ VmWQQfCiXtbbqtXk0DhrunWffZ6s32QdsTPyg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; b=lxAL4aX+0pHYT+54/m1TUR28I5oS7b+BAcnEpF7bhS52fyTaarpm3gvYgNrLYgVcpg N0BT4vVI7jeYBKWQrhcBBxhwm+GaOzKbSoMtcC1VFpDYL1rq8O/VbZsZy+SCgHLu4ABu SxK59ospmK7THbj/gsxcKovKfqi3lzDsaB6PE= Received: by 10.227.24.146 with SMTP id v18mr3180756wbb.84.1307212512408; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:35:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.16.0.3] ([78.186.130.149]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fm14sm1782956wbb.58.2011.06.04.11.35.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:35:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DEA7ADA.40804@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 21:35:06 +0300 From: Kaya Saman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave References: <4DE8CF13.1040304@gmail.com>, <4de9679b.AE3DPW9jNqVtiL2D%perryh@pluto.rain.com>, <4DE9E44E.3080707@gmail.com> <4DEA6060.4158.4CD3CCC9@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4DEA6060.4158.4CD3CCC9@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange system lockups - kernel saying disk error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:35:14 -0000 [...] > Hmmm Hard drives do not like heat! Check the PSU voltages with a > meter, for accuracy and ripple. Failing SMPS's can do all sorts of odd > things. > > Capacitor problems. Been there done that. They can be changed for very > low cost, other than your time. > > DaveB > > You might guess by know, I know far more about hardware than I do about > software, but for the latter to run well, the former must be good. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Many thanks Dave for all the suggestions!!! To be honest I think the drives are fine but the system is just soooo old including the IDE drives. I mean if I get a SATA/IDE USB adapter I should be able to backup the drives to the new DAS system I will have in place shortly since I am much more in favor of running Nexenta Core 3 OS with ZFS spanning the 16x drives meaning a total of 36TB with 2 internal drives used for logging and caching. Then this system will be obsolete. However, I will keep your suggestion of using *spinwrite* in mind next time I encounter issues! BTW I respect your H/W knowledge that's quite in deep :-) thank you for your insight. Best regards, Kaya From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 19:01:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615411065676 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 19:01:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from laraujofe@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC508FC1D for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 19:01:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so2674176fxm.13 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 12:01:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=qkDurNe+TccSPTZ9k9Ny2lmSYdaE6wz3NQgBZfnLr/o=; b=pT+FQsceVVzGzo2nbFDef2+Qj6x6nZqbH3k6cWOcktW/AvyEM3Lyx8kvDL9Aajtns4 5rKp+lU/d53D6rY26wAoh3oqRlGbiKWJTIH7r85G/bpzV0MvZU4CssIf+U4dSsFbndqg 8t3EEjun7dDMyfuBOgTG9GjlzWcXHP8M7E5Lo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=PmfW5hyjbxx61hxNAR/NaPHhPHnJSmmoFTrmdxUyGgzirDPPuzWTGvlmq3ZvhZenZJ 8pSDDFu2SG7+e0S1VF5NW3jDqFHJUVwwe6DPwO8hwagWRcRlCTYry0H149T1oeENJwoV CTy4w7B4iE17WJXWeERZLTc3DeSkbJSdoir7M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.38.149 with SMTP id b21mr3423131fae.18.1307212246962; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:30:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.83.132 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:30:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 15:30:46 -0300 Message-ID: From: Lucas Araujo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: e2fsprogs trouble on freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 19:01:57 -0000 I'm trying to install systemimageer on freebsd 8.1 .But I'm having troubles with the e2fsprogs package.When I use the ./configure in the directory of SI package the system says: ************************************************************ - libuuid not found! - Try installing the e2fsprogs-devel package ************************************************************ So i've installed all the packages called e2fsprogs in ports. And the problems still remains . From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 19:17:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95615106564A for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 19:17:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scott.gasch@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B468FC17 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 19:17:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so3779144bwz.13 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 12:17:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=xTehphAtmwrwsJRyoDB0h1MbZB4DP7gkgMjv56i5Chg=; b=T+Ig2kvVtYaklG3VvSA5BvNwejsJf6NFGpBlKv1RfFCfpzUb4BhoV/XAYyVrDXmZ5u U/yswmZVXC6MvNyPPbO6+yl5ZgkuUAigiycm7SrzkWmoUmewL3V4GkAJij3rxA/EWRr/ eFrQ/9r98Z5K2+mgThaxH3ggB47ly2oHx2sZ8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=romjoFs1Nw/Pz8zZEHCWnBZBPY5sEoCGa9vK0W7Ajiw2sIbm4eSFjo0BuG7fA2CZxq aQ4NP6TposzTxwzFeOA1Pd+s7YwU5Oyfha25zKpDvBDQ7SU/Dj/pwNynmaoMGgWNBxGj t1omiEcF0c9gg5Pq2/4ANUD20oVcGqbszP1fw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.11.22 with SMTP id r22mr3077305bkr.172.1307213194622; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:46:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.79.225 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:46:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:46:34 -0700 Message-ID: From: Scott Gasch To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Usb printers take the same port deterministically? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 19:17:11 -0000 Hi, I have two usb printers on my freebsd machine and I'm using cups. One of the things I've done is publish a raw (no driver) printer for each of them and use that to share them with other machines in the house that have drivers. My problem is that every once in a while, when I boot up, the order of the printers on the usb ports seems to change. For example, right now I've got: Jun 4 11:24:34 foo kernel: ulpt0: on uhub1 Jun 4 11:24:34 foo kernel: ulpt0: using bi-directional mode Jun 4 11:28:13 foo kernel: ulpt1: on uhub7 But when I lost power the other night the machine came up with them reversed -- the brother on ulpt1 and the epson on ulpt0. As far as I can tell, cups printers.conf ties to a particular port. So, you can probably see where this is going... when they bind in the wrong order and someone prints I get a ton of crap printed out and waste a ton of paper. How can I make it so that a particular printer binds to a particular usb port deterministically? Thx, Scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 20:48:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80EF7106564A for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 20:48:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberleo@cyberleo.net) Received: from paka.cyberleo.net (paka.cyberleo.net [66.219.31.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600A88FC0A for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 20:48:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.44.4] (den.cyberleo.net [66.253.36.39]) by paka.cyberleo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 868B22841D; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 16:48:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4DEA9A28.1090907@cyberleo.net> Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 15:48:40 -0500 From: CyberLeo Kitsana User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110508 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lucas Araujo References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: e2fsprogs trouble on freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 20:48:42 -0000 On 06/04/2011 01:30 PM, Lucas Araujo wrote: > I'm trying to install systemimageer on freebsd 8.1 .But I'm having troubles > with the e2fsprogs package.When I use the ./configure in the directory of SI > package the system says: > ************************************************************ > - libuuid not found! > - Try installing the e2fsprogs-devel package > ************************************************************ > > So i've installed all the packages called e2fsprogs in ports. And the > problems still remains . Did you try this one? Port: e2fsprogs-libuuid-1.41.14 Path: /usr/ports/misc/e2fsprogs-libuuid Info: UUID library from e2fsprogs package A quick glance suggests that SystemImager a Linux-centric software package; if the above does not work, perhaps it needs to be told that the library is installed in /usr/local ? -- Fuzzy love, -CyberLeo Technical Administrator CyberLeo.Net Webhosting http://www.CyberLeo.Net Furry Peace! - http://wwww.fur.com/peace/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 20:54:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A32C106566B for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 20:54:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yi0-f54.google.com (mail-yi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52EE08FC21 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 20:54:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yie12 with SMTP id 12so1731645yie.13 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:54:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=pB9Y1AgMLl5l1PYu1P+r1O75nVTEjRcnrwqMZEeFgnM=; b=tX+t1ATyiZzWnN7V301SQpNwCFnGDPnPAz6bDDaeozKZTCg0m/5EUSgxvEXZ263fPm 8VR7JV6uTlbCvAgYyYK/YkF2N5S58cYeXjoYAhLXZv1lWmg91OoX5jr7d/6fMfaaJOOd dhMTjXzRWE55jjT0jM3rS09jhcxZaGsJEm9Us= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=qIIvQN00p1AQwg4S6NAgPnZLPxoccULKLgKnA0ThV4i6UsOewAo/vTvkxc5GuTVite 6BzQvdmDtfE2oRBCH9BlXrGWHBeqCPUmqCWqRxtJSm8Ngoss1fnne2111pL8i80a0V6Q gqgaaCCWJqS5qAgfuotslp5b2/QSnwsJHO3hs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.153.130 with SMTP id f2mr4290727yhk.281.1307220879399; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:54:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.155.67 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 13:54:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 21:54:39 +0100 Message-ID: From: krad To: Darrel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: failure to create zfs storage pool X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 20:54:40 -0000 On 4 June 2011 11:44, Darrel wrote: > > After getting a couple of Hitachi 1T 7200 rpm drives, it seemed >>> like time for ZFS on FreeBSD82, having not had Z file system >>> subsequent to retiring whatever OpenSolaris was around. >>> >>> Basically, I followed this article: >>> >>> /doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/remote-install/installation.html >>> >>> Previous to this, I had been using sysinstall. >>> >>> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad4 count=2 >>> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad6 count=2 >>> >>> fdisk -BI ad4 >>> fdisk -BI ad6 >>> >>> bsdlabel -wB /dev/ad4s1 >>> bsdlabel -wB /dev/ad6s1 >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------- >>> bsdlabel -e /dev/ad4s1 >>> >>> a: 1G 16 4.2BSD 1024 8192 0 >>> b: 5G * swap >>> c: blah,blah >>> d: 20G * 4.2BSD 2048 16384 0 >>> e: 20G * 4.2BSD 2048 16384 0 >>> f: * * unused 0 0 >>> ------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> bsdlabel /dev/ad4s1 > /tmp/bsdlabel.txt && bsdlabel -R \ >>> /dev/ad6s1 /tmp/bsdlabel.txt >>> >>> Now it was way past midnight, I cannot recall but might have run >>> this: >>> >>> gmirror label -nb round-robin gm0 ad4s1 ad6s1 >>> >>> I ran these: >>> >>> gmirror label root ad4s1a ad6s1a >>> gmirror label var ad4s1d ad6s1d >>> gmirror label usr ad4s1e ad6s1e >>> gmirror label -F swap ad4s1b ad6s1b >>> gmirror load >>> >>> newfs -b 8192 -f 1024 /dev/mirror/root >>> newfs /dev/mirror/var >>> newfs /dev/mirror/usr >>> >>> mount /dev/mirror/root /mnt >>> mkdir /mnt/var /mnt/usr >>> mount /dev/mirror/var /mnt/var >>> mount /dev/mirror/usr /mnt/usr >>> >>> So I got the files with 'ftp passive' and followed the article all >>> to the 'reboot' command. Seemed okay. >>> >>> Now at the next page of the article: >>> >>> /doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/remote-install/zfs.html >>> >>> Having read several articles and the zpool manual page, I still >>> have failed to create any kind of ZFS storage pool. >>> >>> >> >> are you trying to do zfs root or just have a freebsd system with a zpool? >> >> You could take the real easy way of getting zfsroot, and install freebsd >> via >> pc-bsd install cd and that would do all the hard work >> >> > Having mirrored SATA disks with a simple zpool on FreeBSD was the > original goal. Thank you for the idea. I can not think of any > reason not to have zfs root. > > What is a drag is that I have already built a new kernel and just > this morning already ran portsnap fetch and extract. > > Perhaps this might also be an opportunity to learn gpart and geom > as well, limiting usage of fdisk, bsdlabel, and sysinstall moving > forward. > > Darrel > well you have 2x disks dont you. Break the mirrors and then you have a free drive. Setup the pool how you want on this then rsync all your os build over onto it. Make any zfs root tweaks you want then boot onto the drive. If all is good then copy across the partition table from the zfs drive to the new one (gpart backup/restore) and attach the relevent slice/partition to pool. Finally put the boot blocks onto the drive, job done no work lost From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 21:47:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E6C106564A for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 21:47:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8EB8FC13 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 21:47:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28840 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2011 21:47:50 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 4 Jun 2011 21:47:50 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766225081F; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 17:47:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id EEC7F39822; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 17:47:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Lucas Araujo References: Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 17:47:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Lucas Araujo's message of "Sat, 4 Jun 2011 15:30:46 -0300") Message-ID: <448vth1d6p.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: e2fsprogs trouble on freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 21:47:51 -0000 Lucas Araujo writes: > I'm trying to install systemimageer on freebsd 8.1 .But I'm having troubles > with the e2fsprogs package.When I use the ./configure in the directory of SI > package the system says: > ************************************************************ > - libuuid not found! > - Try installing the e2fsprogs-devel package > ************************************************************ > > So i've installed all the packages called e2fsprogs in ports. And the > problems still remains . You can define the library path (/usr/local/lib) in LDFLAGS, and you'll get past this step. But after that, you'll need to get past a few more Linux-specific bits to get it working. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 22:09:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9204E1065673 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 22:09:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5220B8FC08 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 22:09:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p54M9RdR034241; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 16:09:27 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p54M9R4U034238; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 16:09:27 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 16:09:27 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: claudiu vasadi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <4DE9ED56.9020504@locolomo.org> <20110604104812.dfbf2888.freebsd@edvax.de> <4DE9F6FC.7060705@locolomo.org> <4DEA3035.4000206@locolomo.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:09:27 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Where's my disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 22:09:28 -0000 On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, claudiu vasadi wrote: > Try booting into single user mode and then: > > # mount -u / > # tunefs -L root /dev/ad6s1a > # reboot Single user yes, but don't remount the filesystem. Just label it and reboot. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 22:14:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8306106566B for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 22:14:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710FA8FC0A for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 22:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gamma.wifi.locolomo.org (gamma.wifi.locolomo.org [172.16.1.5]) by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED2F11C0841 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 00:14:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4DEAAE54.1050508@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 00:14:44 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "questions@FreeBSD.org Questions" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Partitioning with gpart or old style slices? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 22:14:46 -0000 Hi: I just realized how many years ago I haven't been partitioning any disks .. this system is so stable :) So, now I see I have gpart as alternative to fdisk/bsdlabel. I have a 320GB disk which will be dedicated to FBSD, is there any advantage - or any problems (problems as in I've never tried that before) - using gpart instead of the "old" scheme? Do I need kernel modules not in the generic kernel or create extra boot partition? Thanks, Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 22:19:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F27106566B for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 22:19:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACCA8FC14 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 22:19:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p54MJ0qU034280; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 16:19:00 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p54MJ0lR034277; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 16:19:00 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 16:19:00 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Scott Gasch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:19:00 -0600 (MDT) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Usb printers take the same port deterministically? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 22:19:01 -0000 On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Scott Gasch wrote: > Hi, > > I have two usb printers on my freebsd machine and I'm using cups. One of > the things I've done is publish a raw (no driver) printer for each of them > and use that to share them with other machines in the house that have > drivers. > > My problem is that every once in a while, when I boot up, the order of the > printers on the usb ports seems to change. For example, right now I've got: > > Jun 4 11:24:34 foo kernel: ulpt0: 2.00/1.00, addr 2> on uhub1 > Jun 4 11:24:34 foo kernel: ulpt0: using bi-directional mode > Jun 4 11:28:13 foo kernel: ulpt1: 0/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2> on uhub7 > > > But when I lost power the other night the machine came up with them reversed > -- the brother on ulpt1 and the epson on ulpt0. > > As far as I can tell, cups printers.conf ties to a particular port. So, you > can probably see where this is going... when they bind in the wrong order > and someone prints I get a ton of crap printed out and waste a ton of paper. > How can I make it so that a particular printer binds to a particular usb > port deterministically? devd.conf. But I don't think there's any control over ulpt. Instead, maybe create links so /dev/ulpt-hl2140 and /dev/ulpt-epson12 are linked to the right devices, and use those where static devices are needed. Untested... attach 20 { device-name "ulpt[0-9]"; match "vendor" "0x1234"; # Brother match "product" "0x4321"; # HL-2140 action "ln -s /dev/$device-name /dev/ulpt-hl2140"; }; detach 20 { device-name "ulpt[0-9]"; match "vendor" "0x1234"; # Brother match "product" "0x4321"; # HL-2140 action "rm /dev/ulpt-hl2140"; }; From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 23:22:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75BE9106566B for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 23:22:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yi0-f54.google.com (mail-yi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350CE8FC0A for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 23:22:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yie12 with SMTP id 12so1757015yie.13 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:22:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bEWNnT0RehLr+uomT861Fi72i6N2bijO6vnrgPej1qY=; b=VOTsziKFGfW1ppDvdCGSBL7l6WvDgYoJgv3zND0mDpyOf4Xp/2qzyg0TH0EVcrD+43 hFOXgfqqaifMdu1Qv2K48yOb9YpYKh8yp+WPVAGKm/fUCgZ3xnCjcBdG6MMFs15zR0Pg FhdKI70ZXfStM3Ja6eUq0axS5+JmNLbM6NsR0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lrRCZWNVakGInX+gjit4YW4GPGAisl3reLlwNrGkuqpH/c+6oJdm4RoziHOi0+l7gK adE1j/2DDUOnFt7aj3aN7WbXfDpNaD0uLasEhI6KCONkcbf6bjd6lodJnJwJ8KDbeIHO yB8HyXg8nycgdCRur6V8NC5HvCelmBNiK4BzY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.152.37 with SMTP id e37mr2543019ano.124.1307229330624; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:15:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.227.17 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 16:15:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DEAAE54.1050508@locolomo.org> References: <4DEAAE54.1050508@locolomo.org> Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 19:15:30 -0400 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: "questions@FreeBSD.org Questions" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: Partitioning with gpart or old style slices? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 23:22:45 -0000 On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Erik N=F8rgaard wro= te: > - or any problems (problems as in I've never tried that before) - using > gpart instead of the "old" scheme? Sorry for the double post, but the only problem that I've encountered is after creating a encrypted provider with geli(8), that provider cannot be partitioned using the GPT scheme. You can still partition it using gpart(8), but the scheme must be BSD or MBR. I am not sure whether this is a bug or just the way GPT partitions work, but it is not that big of a problem unless you want to have very large encrypted providers that are GPT scheme partitions. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 23:28:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52B0106564A for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 23:28:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scott.gasch@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F358FC14 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 23:28:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so3875478bwz.13 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:28:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=8yhg5WlbcyxpXkRIr9nyUAWSAEUvaFurP7Rn0jB6CKg=; b=qj31nmEWvVJoKdWnFmqVPPqzJrEPgYYGEM0fo7LoZuMm7zP0IzSjcKdKR2gfZ1347u Hhoac6L/DS0gmjUaLd6Fqtdrcrj7uP6Tkn/OHoLFVJIbVcajZN4Q0gwbdcmQlzfZWHc0 DNuhdJCPnAvYIQ8vUxoZKt/Smg4QgW5i8XA0w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=j03V8tat1ygPyNory+/qeVygRJxj/VICHc/kMnz3/4/uqiE9gKaDQlaU3W6EgkwrmR 4R2vpVjqHneiqruOuDHJw0lqMZD8EwtZf4po/P0rNlEapAwJGRktQ2hGiTeJQxfAba8c k9OB/OerPoTF+V++/YOaYWmyzt+hAvylWMaIY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.11.22 with SMTP id r22mr3253108bkr.172.1307230116076; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:28:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.79.225 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 16:28:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 16:28:36 -0700 Message-ID: From: Scott Gasch To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Usb printers take the same port deterministically? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 23:28:37 -0000 Thanks, Warren. Works great, mostly :) I actually need the "unlpt*" device because of publishing the raw printers. Hooking the attach/detach of those device names directly did not work. Adding an action to the "ulpt" device does work... but I then ran into the problem of pulling the number out of the $device variable to figure out what port just attached. After some messing around (I tried to match the device and serial variables) I gave up and just made two entries per printer: one for ulpt0 and one for ulpt1 (see below). Just because I'm a pain, how does this work if you have two printers from the same vendor? Epson's product code 0x0009, for example, means "high speed usb 2.0 printer". So I'm guessing, really, that any epson printer would match? Thx, Scott Here's the final working version for the archives: attach 20 { device-name "ulpt0"; match "vendor" "0x04f9"; # Brother match "product" "0x0033"; # HL-2140 action "ln -s /dev/$device-name /dev/ulpt-brother"; action "ln -s /dev/unlpt0 /dev/unlpt-brother"; }; attach 20 { device-name "ulpt1"; match "vendor" "0x04f9"; # Brother match "product" "0x0033"; # HL-2140 action "ln -s /dev/$device-name /dev/ulpt-brother"; action "ln -s /dev/unlpt1 /dev/unlpt-brother"; }; detach 20 { device-name "ulpt[0-9]"; match "vendor" "0x04f9"; # Brother match "product" "0x0033"; # HL-2140 action "rm -f /dev/ulpt-brother"; action "rm -f /dev/unlpt-brother"; }; # --- attach 20 { device-name "ulpt0"; match "vendor" "0x04b8"; # Epson match "product" "0x0007"; # Photostylus R800 action "ln -s /dev/$device-name /dev/ulpt-epson"; action "ln -s /dev/unlpt0 /dev/unlpt-epson"; }; attach 20 { device-name "ulpt1"; match "vendor" "0x04b8"; # Epson match "product" "0x0007"; # Photostylus R800 action "ln -s /dev/$device-name /dev/ulpt-epson"; action "ln -s /dev/unlpt1 /dev/unlpt-epson"; }; detach 20 { device-name "ulpt[0-9]"; match "vendor" "0x04b8"; # Epson match "product" "0x0007"; # Photostylus R800 action "rm -f /dev/ulpt-epson"; action "rm -f /dev/unlpt-epson"; }; On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Scott Gasch wrote: > > Hi, >> >> I have two usb printers on my freebsd machine and I'm using cups. One of >> the things I've done is publish a raw (no driver) printer for each of them >> and use that to share them with other machines in the house that have >> drivers. >> >> My problem is that every once in a while, when I boot up, the order of the >> printers on the usb ports seems to change. For example, right now I've >> got: >> >> Jun 4 11:24:34 foo kernel: ulpt0: > 2.00/1.00, addr 2> on uhub1 >> Jun 4 11:24:34 foo kernel: ulpt0: using bi-directional mode >> Jun 4 11:28:13 foo kernel: ulpt1: > 0/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2> on uhub7 >> >> >> But when I lost power the other night the machine came up with them >> reversed >> -- the brother on ulpt1 and the epson on ulpt0. >> >> As far as I can tell, cups printers.conf ties to a particular port. So, >> you >> can probably see where this is going... when they bind in the wrong order >> and someone prints I get a ton of crap printed out and waste a ton of >> paper. >> How can I make it so that a particular printer binds to a particular usb >> port deterministically? >> > > devd.conf. But I don't think there's any control over ulpt. Instead, > maybe create links so /dev/ulpt-hl2140 and /dev/ulpt-epson12 are linked to > the right devices, and use those where static devices are needed. > Untested... > > attach 20 { > device-name "ulpt[0-9]"; > match "vendor" "0x1234"; # Brother > match "product" "0x4321"; # HL-2140 > action "ln -s /dev/$device-name /dev/ulpt-hl2140"; > }; > > detach 20 { > device-name "ulpt[0-9]"; > match "vendor" "0x1234"; # Brother > match "product" "0x4321"; # HL-2140 > action "rm /dev/ulpt-hl2140"; > }; > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 23:31:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527BC1065676 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 23:31:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yi0-f54.google.com (mail-yi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BC38FC21 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 23:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yie12 with SMTP id 12so1758369yie.13 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:31:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P5YoHcX9GJbkLxkOEo7dM5dwkY63mwITcksW3SISAvM=; b=gMbJKX8QBbZMR5xL2jbEfsX3dd2uk97t+xH1W+mUwyJdwFVGEevQ2zxW/t+KS3WOBv WsTBV2/kBe8121jgk4IIeAVkzGNWcsgrmJCj01q2sFvfqwvk6YaJWV8JB+rIt2vbYQkn mc6LwW29jpY/NongszAmgdDkmCrLI7/Uk729k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JhPz/NiJT94QGlgwvOzf12Edc77+ui20YeYaJgc7BXErj9AAUeHYVy6ElztAlJAPl6 QB9Cq7IH7srn30cIm2LQrylI3RQ2PnDOnCRaWnK/Fnoou7sVkpdSEz5KtEhxnjYUFXZt xHfsnniMbt7lHjjbqFxY4TlYyRPRFJo9TBhic= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.28.33 with SMTP id f33mr2462092anj.36.1307228951829; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:09:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.227.17 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 16:09:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DEAAE54.1050508@locolomo.org> References: <4DEAAE54.1050508@locolomo.org> Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 19:09:11 -0400 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: "questions@FreeBSD.org Questions" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: Partitioning with gpart or old style slices? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 23:31:25 -0000 On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Erik N=F8rgaard wro= te: > I just realized how many years ago I haven't been partitioning any disks = .. > this system is so stable :) So, now I see I have gpart as alternative to > fdisk/bsdlabel. gpart(8) from my experience is far superior to all the older tools. > > I have a 320GB disk which will be dedicated to FBSD, is there any advanta= ge > - or any problems (problems as in I've never tried that before) - using > gpart instead of the "old" scheme? It is clean and clear as to what you are doing, and it supports GPT scheme partitions. > > Do I need kernel modules not in the generic kernel or create extra boot > partition? If you use it to make GPT partitions, you will need a freebsd-boot partition with the proper bootcode for what you want to do. If you search this mailing list's archive, I've posted basic instructions for gpart/GPT partitioning recently, perhaps there needs to be a section added to Handbook 18.3.2 describing the basics. Unfortunately, the only mention in the handbook is a link to the man page in section 18.3.