Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 18 Dec 2011 01:01:42 +0100
From:      Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
To:        mdf@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r228625 - head/usr.bin/csup
Message-ID:  <4EED2D66.3000304@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAMBSHm9=0%2BZ%2BC687097WW_mGaNUpJ7Tbo7SZa4XLr7g0L2ecOQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201112171314.pBHDEjtQ060509@svn.freebsd.org> <CAMBSHm9cBbCxZ9MvgPvKgYfSxPSpeofgTq0NnJo=e3tR5idxEQ@mail.gmail.com> <4EED0F99.2020306@FreeBSD.org> <CAMBSHm9=0%2BZ%2BC687097WW_mGaNUpJ7Tbo7SZa4XLr7g0L2ecOQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2011-12-18 00:49, mdf@FreeBSD.org wrote:
...
> Also, long long is a bit of a hack that came in before C99
> standardized on a few wider types, and the PRIu64 macros are really
> hideous.

I agree they're ugly, but C99 should simply have defined length
modifiers for int64_t and friends, then the PRI macros could have been
avoided.  (Although not without backwards compatibility problems, but
you would have those anyway. :)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EED2D66.3000304>