From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan  8 11:30:14 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE91106566B
	for <freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  8 Jan 2012 11:30:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7EA48FC0A
	for <freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  8 Jan 2012 11:30:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q08BUDqK099334
	for <freebsd-amd64@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 11:30:13 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q08BUDvk099331;
	Sun, 8 Jan 2012 11:30:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 11:30:13 GMT
Message-Id: <201201081130.q08BUDvk099331@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org
From: umage <umage@netvor.sk>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 11:46:50 +0000
Cc: 
Subject: Re: amd64/160561: no C-states on atom D525
X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: umage <umage@netvor.sk>
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform <freebsd-amd64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 11:30:14 -0000

The following reply was made to PR amd64/160561; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: umage <umage@netvor.sk>
To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, theultramage@gmail.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: amd64/160561: no C-states on atom D525
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:05:42 +0100

 A freebsd user with an identical issue pointed me at
 http://download.intel.com/embedded/processors/prodbrief/323288.pdf which
 lists various atom processors and their "C-states supported". Turns out
 D525 has no C-state power management, so what we encountered was not a
 bug, but an intentional (but not advertised) hardware 'feature'.