From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 26 01:16:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9716106566B for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 01:16:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-apache@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 612A98FC0C for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 01:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop3.herveybayaustralia.com.au (unknown [192.168.0.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD4ED5C29; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 11:31:42 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <503978DF.9080007@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 11:16:15 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120728 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: olli hauer References: <503625D3.8040005@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <50363B55.2070400@gmx.de> <50364CC4.90609@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <50365344.60901@gmx.de> <5037576E.30400@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <50376EA9.2030702@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <50376EA9.2030702@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dav_lock not enabled? X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 01:16:24 -0000 On 08/24/12 22:08, olli hauer wrote: > On 2012-08-24 12:29, Da Rock wrote: >> On 08/24/12 01:59, olli hauer wrote: >>> On 2012-08-23 17:31, Da Rock wrote: >>>> On 08/24/12 00:16, olli hauer wrote: >>>>> On 2012-08-23 14:45, Da Rock wrote: >>>>>> I'm attempting to get a working webdav system going on my apache- and I'm having some issues with locking. Apparently my only means of doing this is using mod_dav_lock. And before any nay sayers pipe up, neither openoffice or libreoffice will work without it - just for starters. >>>>>> > [...] > >>> Regards, >>> olli >> Thanks Olli. I was thinking along those lines, but it was late and I was turning into a pumpkin :) Just couldn't quite get my head around all the details... >> >> Cheers for the patch - it appears to all work btw. >> > Thanks for the reports. > > I have to think if this module should be ON by default ... > > From http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_dav_lock.html > > Summary > This module implements a generic locking API which can be used by any backend provider of mod_dav. It requires at least the service of mod_dav. *But without a backend provider which makes use of it, it's useless and should not be loaded into the server*. A sample backend module which actually utilizes mod_dav_lock is mod_dav_svn, the subversion provider module. > > *Note that mod_dav_fs does not need this generic locking module, because it uses its own more specialized version.* > > In order to make mod_dav_lock functional, you just have to specify the location of the lock database using the DavGenericLockDB directive described below. > > > So this explains why subversion can handle locks even without the module but why does libre/open-office need the module? > Shouldn't libre/open-office work properly with mod_fav_fs ?? I'm just going through this now; libreoffice has the ability to access webdav directly but because of certificate issues it won't (besides, its just not easy user wise), so I'm using wdfs to mount the store. wdfs appears to hold the key here now, I've gone through everything else. I'm looking at the logs and debug output from wdfs, and it appears to be locking, retrieving, locking again (x2), which apache is returning a 423 (normal behaviour), but wdfs is reading as somebody else has it and returns a readonly to the app. This is happening across all apps now as well. At least it is locking now, I checked this with cadaver and it appears normal with the dav_lock enabled. I'm just reviewing the code for wdfs to see why it is behaving this way; an interesting point is that locking is not enabled by default with wdfs. That causes *office to go into coniptions and misbehave, but it may be disabled due to the issues here. Wierd... can't find much in the way of support because the site is mainly in german which I can't quite read :) so I've let the author know my findings so far. See how it goes... Thanks again Olli. With regards turning on the module in the build, I'd say to just have it as an option or even just a knob that can be enabled when required. I can't imagine there'd be many users out there besides myself. Cheers From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 26 04:34:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A18106567D for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 04:34:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce@handicapgambling.com) Received: from falcon257.startdedicated.com (falcon257.startdedicated.com [199.217.113.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997DD8FC26 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 04:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from falcon257.startdedicated.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by falcon257.startdedicated.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C38013401804 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 06:34:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www.mailservernet.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by falcon257.startdedicated.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 06:34:09 +0200 (CEST) To: apache@freebsd.org Message-ID: Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 06:00:03 +0200 From: "Steve McMahon" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer-LID: 16 X-Mailer-RecptId: 457003 X-Mailer-SID: 31 X-Mailer-Sent-By: 1 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Steve McMahon tips X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: macca@handicapgambling.com List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 04:34:10 -0000 [http://www.mailservernet.com/int/link.php?M=457003&N=31&L=4&F=T greatest Hang Cheng tipping service PRIVATELINE88 is the World's BEST Asian Handicap Tipping Service Hello, I'm Steve McMahon, leading presenter on ESPN Star Sports. I'm part of the very successful group here at Privateline88. Using our inside contacts, we specialise in providing accurate Asian Handicap tips to our members. Our members receive between 7 & 10 tips every week, and our strike rate is an amazing 90%+. Subscribe now to find out why PRIVATELINE88 IS THE BEST ASIAN HANDICAP TIPPING SERVICE. [http://www.mailservernet.com/int/link.php?M=457003&N=31&L=7&F=T hangchengbetting all rights reserved. You are receiving this email as you registered at www.hangchengbetting.com [http://www.mailservernet.com/int/link.php?M=457003&N=31&L=2&F=T] Our mailing address is: Macau, Tau AlaPera Dr. Ben H, Assumpcao, No 668-672, Cheng Feng Centro Comercial, 3 Andar H If you prefer to no longer receive our emails, please unsubscribe [mailto:macca@handicapgambling.com] here. From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 27 11:06:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D00D106567B for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:06:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D688FC2A for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:06:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7RB6FK3085140 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:06:15 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7RB6EUQ085138 for apache@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:06:14 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:06:14 GMT Message-Id: <201208271106.q7RB6EUQ085138@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: apache@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to apache@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:06:15 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o ports/167965 apache if to make port (www/apache22) with an option: WITH_AL o ports/165809 apache add mod_proxy patch to www/apache22 o ports/157554 apache www/apache22: Apache RLimitNPROC does not work as inte o ports/156787 apache www/mod_auth_kerb2 fails on undefined symbol with base o ports/147282 apache errors when starting www/apache22 after installation o o ports/137729 apache www/mod_auth_kerb2 port broken on 8.0-BETA2 due to sec o ports/130479 apache www/apache22 configure_args busted o ports/125183 apache www/apache22 wrong SUEXEC_DOCROOT o ports/124375 apache security/heimdal: www/mod_auth_kerb doesn't compile ag 9 problems total. From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 27 17:40:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9B4106564A for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:40:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D1C8FC12 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7RHe3MU062369 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:40:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7RHe3Wn062368; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:40:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:40:03 GMT Message-Id: <201208271740.q7RHe3Wn062368@freefall.freebsd.org> To: apache@FreeBSD.org From: Jo Rhett Cc: Subject: Re: ports/159608: www/apache22: apache WITH_BDB_BASE settings described in UPDATING do not work X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jo Rhett List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:40:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/159608; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jo Rhett To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/159608: www/apache22: apache WITH_BDB_BASE settings described in UPDATING do not work Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:14:04 -0700 --Apple-Mail=_1390C092-11FC-4BF0-9B9A-25EA06E29CAA Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii When did this change? It absolutely wasn't broken since apache 1.3. I = was happily using the WITH_BDB_BASE settings with apache 2.0 and then = 2.2 right up until I tried to recompile for 2.2.21. So it was broken = between 2.2.17 and 2.2.21. Finally, the dbmmanage which ships with apache only works with the built = in db, so clearly it is intended to work. Something was broken in the = port. --=20 Jo Rhett Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet = projects. --Apple-Mail=_1390C092-11FC-4BF0-9B9A-25EA06E29CAA Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii When = did this change? It absolutely wasn't broken since apache 1.3.  I = was happily using the WITH_BDB_BASE settings with apache 2.0 and then = 2.2 right up until I tried to recompile for 2.2.21. So it was broken = between 2.2.17 and 2.2.21.

Finally, the dbmmanage = which ships with apache only works with the built in db, so clearly it = is intended to work. Something was broken in the = port.

-- 
Jo = Rhett
Net Consonance : net philanthropy = to improve open source and internet projects.

= --Apple-Mail=_1390C092-11FC-4BF0-9B9A-25EA06E29CAA-- From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 27 19:43:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146F0106564A for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:43:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 76D598FC25 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2012 19:43:32 -0000 Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.0.100]) [87.139.233.65] by mail.gmx.net (mp072) with SMTP; 27 Aug 2012 21:43:32 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1956535 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/UGKJIEyrU1Lz8IiX5BYJgmm9J8lK5G5lVTMIPLU D9HUwptQOzeQah Message-ID: <503BCDE3.1080706@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 21:43:31 +0200 From: olli hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: apache@FreeBSD.org References: <201208271740.q7RHe3Wn062368@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201208271740.q7RHe3Wn062368@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Jo Rhett Subject: Re: ports/159608: www/apache22: apache WITH_BDB_BASE settings described in UPDATING do not work X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 19:43:35 -0000 On 2012-08-27 19:40, Jo Rhett wrote: > The following reply was made to PR ports/159608; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Jo Rhett > To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org > Cc: > Subject: Re: ports/159608: www/apache22: apache WITH_BDB_BASE settings described in UPDATING do not work > Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:14:04 -0700 > > --Apple-Mail=_1390C092-11FC-4BF0-9B9A-25EA06E29CAA > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset=us-ascii > > When did this change? It absolutely wasn't broken since apache 1.3. I = > was happily using the WITH_BDB_BASE settings with apache 2.0 and then = > 2.2 right up until I tried to recompile for 2.2.21. So it was broken = > between 2.2.17 and 2.2.21. > > Finally, the dbmmanage which ships with apache only works with the built = > in db, so clearly it is intended to work. Something was broken in the = > port. Ok, lets take a look to the apache related configure parameters. $> httpd-2.2.2 # ./configure --help | grep -i -e db -e ber --enable-authn-dbm DBM-based authentication control --enable-authn-dbd SQL-based authentication control --enable-authz-dbm DBM-based authorization control --enable-dbd Apache DBD Framework --enable-static-htdbm Build a statically linked version of htdbm httpd-2.2.22 # ./configure --help | grep -i -e db -e ber --enable-authn-dbm DBM-based authentication control --enable-authn-dbd SQL-based authentication control --enable-authz-dbm DBM-based authorization control --enable-dbd Apache DBD Framework --enable-static-htdbm Build a statically linked version of htdbm --enable-static-httxt2dbm Build a statically linked version of httxt2dbm So we can confirm the WITH_DB... parameters in Makefile.modules was a leftover from the bundled apr. May 5 2010: - 2/5: Update to httpd 2.2.15, default to using devel/apr instead of bundled apr http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=253782 May 18 2010 (PORTVERSION=2.2.15): - Remove WITH_APR_FROM_PORTS option. Always use devel/apr1 port now. Bundled srclib/apr is never used now. http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=254535 Now if we go back to RELENG_6_0 and look into the apr port then we can find the following line - LIB_DEPENDS+= db-4.2.2:${PORTSDIR}/databases/db42 http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/tags/RELEASE_6_0_0/devel/apr/Makefile?annotate=145534 which was changed Apr 6 2006 to - WITH_BDB= 42+ http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/devel/apr1/Makefile?r1=158941&r2=158942& Knowing this, we can say with the removal of the bundled apr/apr-util in May 18 2010 was the last version which supported WITH_BDB_BASE. Also we can say not an httpd but an apr-util limitation. Meanwhile apache also bundles APR-1.4.5 and APR-Util-1.4.1 and they have no BDB_BASE support. What we really don't want is to backport everything like RHEL, (they are using apr-1.3.x but together with db47) The reason to not use the bundled apr/apr-util is we can update both independent in the port devel/apr, and in case there are security issues or other fixes we can update this port. If you have a fix for apr-util which will be accepted upstream I'm happy to include the patch. PS: Please send plain text only mails to the list. -- Regards, olli From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 03:21:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0924106566B for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 03:21:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@webottimizzazione.com) Received: from webottimizzazione.com (ecos0080.atman.pl [213.189.52.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2016E8FC14 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 03:21:31 +0000 (UTC) To: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org From: "Seo-Web Contatti" Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 05:21:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20120828_032143_006423.info@webottimizzazione.com> X-Mailer: MAIL Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Ottimizzazione delle pagine Web X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 03:21:33 -0000 Buongiorno, se vi state chiedendo a cosa possa esservi utile l'ottimizzazione del Vostro sito internet, provate a porvi una delle domande di seguito elencate e se la risposta ad almeno una di esse sarà SÌ, allora vuol dire che l'ottimizzazione è per Voi più che necessaria! - ricevi poche visite al tuo sito internet. - il tuo sito non si riesce a trovare sui vari motori di ricerca - il tuo sito web non viene presentato correttamente sui motori di ricerca, - i clienti non riescono a trovare le informazioni loro necessarie ed abbandonano velocemente il Tuo sito, - i clienti acquistano dalla concorrenza e non da Te, - vuoi essere certo che il tuo sito web sia sicuro, - la concorrenza ha fatto dei passi avanti e Tu desideri superarla. Ecco alcuni dei più importanti vantaggi della ottimizzazione: - l'incremento delle visite e della visibilità del vostro sito, - l'acquisizione di una clientela ben definita, realmente interessata ai prodotti oppure ai servizi proposti, - un migliore posizionamento sui vari motori di ricerca, ad esempio google, - l'incremento delle vendite, - l'aumento della riconoscibilità Aziendale, ad un costo bassissimo, - l'aumento del prestigio Aziendale, grazie all'utilizzo di tecnologie avanzate, - la possibilità di competere con le migliori aziende e maggiormente conosciute del paese, - una migliore indicizzazione del sito web sui vari motori di ricerca, - l'assensa di abbonamento Ma soprattutto la consapevolezza che dopo sole due settimane, dal momento in cui avremo dato il via all'ottimizzazione del Vostro sito, Vi ritroverete nella prima pagina dei maggiori motori di ricerca. Sperando vogliate usufruire dei Nostri servizi, Vi invitiamo a visitare il nostro sito internet: http://www.web-ottimizzazione.com Cordiali saluti --- Web-Ottimizzazione SeoWeb ITALY --- http://www.web-ottimizzazione.com From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 22:10:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534D4106564A; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:10:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276568FC20; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:10:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7SMAucB041376; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:10:56 GMT (envelope-from edwin@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from edwin@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7SMAuXN041372; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:10:56 GMT (envelope-from edwin) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:10:56 GMT Message-Id: <201208282210.q7SMAuXN041372@freefall.freebsd.org> To: edwin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, apache@FreeBSD.org From: edwin@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/171148: New port: www/mod_umask Apache 2.x module to set umask X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:10:56 -0000 Synopsis: New port: www/mod_umask Apache 2.x module to set umask Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->apache Responsible-Changed-By: edwin Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Aug 28 22:10:55 UTC 2012 Responsible-Changed-Why: apache@ wants this port PRs (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=171148 From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 28 22:55:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9868106564A; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:55:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0E48FC1C; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:55:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7SMtMSQ047561; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:55:22 GMT (envelope-from ohauer@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from ohauer@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7SMtMae047557; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:55:22 GMT (envelope-from ohauer) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:55:22 GMT Message-Id: <201208282255.q7SMtMae047557@freefall.freebsd.org> To: gebhart@secnetix.de, ohauer@FreeBSD.org, apache@FreeBSD.org, ohauer@FreeBSD.org From: ohauer@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/171148: New port: www/mod_umask Apache 2.x module to set umask X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:55:22 -0000 Synopsis: New port: www/mod_umask Apache 2.x module to set umask State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: ohauer State-Changed-When: Tue Aug 28 22:54:46 UTC 2012 State-Changed-Why: Committed, Thanks! Responsible-Changed-From-To: apache->ohauer Responsible-Changed-By: ohauer Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Aug 28 22:54:46 UTC 2012 Responsible-Changed-Why: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=171148 From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 09:38:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8BC106577C; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:38:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gebhart@secnetix.de) Received: from pluto.secnetix.de (pluto.secnetix.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:1141::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86D28FC21; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:38:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pluto.secnetix.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pluto.secnetix.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7T9crE4016050; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:38:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from gebhart@pluto.secnetix.de) Received: (from gebhart@localhost) by pluto.secnetix.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q7T9crMl016049; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:38:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from gebhart) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:38:53 +0200 From: Ralf Gebhart To: ohauer@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20120829093853.GI86537@secnetix.de> References: <201208282255.q7SMtMae047557@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <201208282255.q7SMtMae047557@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (pluto.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:38:53 +0200 (CEST) Cc: apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/171148: New port: www/mod_umask Apache 2.x module to set umask X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:38:55 -0000 On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:55:22PM +0000, ohauer@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Synopsis: New port: www/mod_umask Apache 2.x module to set umask > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: ohauer > State-Changed-When: Tue Aug 28 22:54:46 UTC 2012 > State-Changed-Why: > Committed, > Thanks! > > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: apache->ohauer > Responsible-Changed-By: ohauer > Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Aug 28 22:54:46 UTC 2012 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=171148 Thanx for committing it so fast, but I guess you made a mistake in ports/www/Makefile . Shouldn't it be SUBDIR += mod_umask instead of SUBDIR += mod_mask ? -- Ralf Gebhart secnetix GmbH & Co KG - Marktplatz 29 - 85567 Grafing http://www.secnetix.de , Handelsregister: Registergericht München HRA 74606 From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 17:42:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127CD106566C for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:42:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-src@helfman.org) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A358FC08 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so3606071pbb.13 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:42:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :x-operating-system:organization:x-living-the-dream :x-pgp-fingerprint:x-pgp-key:user-agent:x-gm-message-state; bh=/iMMzVj6UAjuQOOrMybCQj+IL663xSZ+/ZJd+i9Q2IM=; b=hc6G2U0QXD1hWG0A9pPuKVXSRZwMSn/Fo9x1OW6DMcLDWNkYWbqhJGOJOGnVqjqcHi o3rCDaz9CVqxrwlBOCdQTqnyJZGvZfyewBrDvd8NQHlXxXRo5g7DiKXsTnGudejIjbQx KCUJCooTO7Mg+GzXp+ah3RYTv6f8+KIekXsgs8OBVXBKosTP8gSA1+XG/x1x8jP5pVOa RpZCHb1sx2VyDAYhqA5O+qaOslEkhAbwE7wuUw0zFKWJjAZ5XMx/h5U4DHjzrtRMzsoY P/CfvpWhHvhI6AZmpD7as6DoUAA4i4OzqefNwxliU95qxbg6dSzNCr93XSQGEl7ntz29 Gc3w== Received: by 10.68.227.165 with SMTP id sb5mr12488715pbc.82.1346348567327; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:42:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dormouse.experts-exchange.com ([72.29.164.238]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id vf8sm1922534pbc.27.2012.08.30.10.42.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:42:46 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Jason Helfman Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:40:29 -0700 From: Jason Helfman To: apache@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120830174029.GM63706@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE amd64 Organization: The FreeBSD Project, http://www.freebsd.org X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! X-PGP-FingerPrint: 8E0D C457 9A0F C91C 23F3 0454 2059 9A63 4150 D3DC X-PGP-Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh/jgh.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlzvpDF6LFw+m/tZv13Z8dfXpyGubnIzV3sKR2mp54h/d/UTBheiApyHZRjAahwuvnt4qQa Cc: Subject: apache-2.2.22_6 question X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:42:48 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I was wondering what implications there are of building apache-2.2.22_6 against pcre version of 8.02? I believe a patch addressed a deprecated function of pcre, however at the moment I am unable to update a snapshotted portstree to a current version, or even move to a newer tree. I don't know if it would build with that patch, or without the patch, and if that would be good, or not, and what implications there may be as a result. Many Thanks! - -jgh - -- Jason Helfman FreeBSD Committer | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh | The Power To Serve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQP6WNAAoJECBZmmNBUNPcMx8H/Atq2oGNkuTOtl4GNYlDytCG CsGWLqg0p99q+bCij6U64hC0A3KBcqegGKR5cvbAyuXQCklo8mP/HYzXuQLZv+mX MBsOWvkWpJLzTnDWcJFtkuBQXnXDUe7XHuq1ediCUmoCJxdPLmJo8AEuUQaseOU/ p9nFNe2SObWTQH/Vh1NOHCHSKX0vTr2+G5/nowM71C92qS6WKMdbtIH5LcN+/zP8 cuepj1yxt1P/MHxiyz2WI7oSNqosKHH0cRfUKRPkTrLVI7o9+STKWg7BHF7uSUqo CJJSX1f+MLFGP2v3Ckdm5hfHBXYxUzYKaDgjKS8yNr+o8b+0BtsSg02zupr0lOg= =1DLn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 18:17:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44FBF106566B; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:17:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.139.233.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F283C8FC15; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cde1100.uni.vrs [192.168.0.100]) (Authenticated sender: ohauer) by p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7747E208C3; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:16:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <503FAE12.8070201@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:16:50 +0200 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: apache@freebsd.org References: <20120830174029.GM63706@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> In-Reply-To: <20120830174029.GM63706@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jason Helfman Subject: Re: apache-2.2.22_6 question X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "apache@FreeBSD.org" List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:17:06 -0000 On 2012-08-30 19:40, Jason Helfman wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering what implications there are of building apache-2.2.22_6 > against pcre version of 8.02? > > I believe a patch addressed a deprecated function of pcre, however at the > moment I am unable to update a snapshotted portstree to a current > version, or even move to a newer tree. > > I don't know if it would build with that patch, or without the patch, and if > that would be good, or not, and what implications there may be as a result. > > Many Thanks! > > -jgh > Hi Jason, exact, the bump and patch was done because pcre removed a (long) deprecated function. pcre-8.02 will full support the patch because the new api was in this version already the default. file pcre-8.02/pcreposix.c (around line 265) -------------------------------------------- preg->re_nsub = pcre_info((const pcre *)preg->re_pcre, NULL, NULL); return 0; } apache22/files/files/patch-server__util_pcre.c ---------------------------------------------- -preg->re_nsub = pcre_info((const pcre *)preg->re_pcre, NULL, NULL); +pcre_fullinfo((const pcre *)preg->re_pcre, NULL, + PCRE_INFO_CAPTURECOUNT, &(preg->re_nsub)); -- Regards, olli From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 18:36:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9B7106566B for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:36:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 760A98FC0A for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:36:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2012 18:36:19 -0000 Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.0.100]) [87.139.233.65] by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 30 Aug 2012 20:36:19 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1956535 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/UYOIJHinU5IKg/qvrnL87mOt9knbZoPu05gdxCk dEpN2/6upayJY9 Message-ID: <503FB2A2.7080007@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:36:18 +0200 From: olli hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "apache@FreeBSD.org" References: <20120830174029.GM63706@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <503FAE12.8070201@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <503FAE12.8070201@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Jason Helfman Subject: Re: apache-2.2.22_6 question X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "apache@FreeBSD.org" List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:36:22 -0000 On 2012-08-30 20:16, Olli Hauer wrote: > On 2012-08-30 19:40, Jason Helfman wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I was wondering what implications there are of building apache-2.2.22_6 >> against pcre version of 8.02? >> >> I believe a patch addressed a deprecated function of pcre, however at the >> moment I am unable to update a snapshotted portstree to a current >> version, or even move to a newer tree. >> >> I don't know if it would build with that patch, or without the patch, and if >> that would be good, or not, and what implications there may be as a result. >> >> Many Thanks! >> >> -jgh >> > > Hi Jason, > > exact, the bump and patch was done because pcre removed a (long) deprecated function. > pcre-8.02 will full support the patch because the new api was in this version already > the default. > > file pcre-8.02/pcreposix.c (around line 265) > -------------------------------------------- > preg->re_nsub = pcre_info((const pcre *)preg->re_pcre, NULL, NULL); > return 0; > } > > > apache22/files/files/patch-server__util_pcre.c > ---------------------------------------------- > -preg->re_nsub = pcre_info((const pcre *)preg->re_pcre, NULL, NULL); > +pcre_fullinfo((const pcre *)preg->re_pcre, NULL, > + PCRE_INFO_CAPTURECOUNT, &(preg->re_nsub)); > > Ups, pcre_info != pcre_fullinfo. But pcre_fullinfo is already in 8.02 present, so I assume it will work with the patch. -- Regards, olli From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 18:39:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79AEE1065673 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:39:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-src@helfman.org) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407838FC12 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:39:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadr6 with SMTP id r6so1388314dad.13 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:39:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-operating-system :organization:x-living-the-dream:x-pgp-fingerprint:x-pgp-key :user-agent:x-gm-message-state; bh=jv219IlrVBMR2OIuQwNp0W4zpqsWcEQxp8B2cxMBRN8=; b=mAJjr3cBhmNDRmBolDyyX1kiGMSes5l5ew5pQY2G9qaqvFDc/+BQbvba9u26poyEy/ 7Q9tQCko7Cgpw+qlGIA0KYJvSCqeuG8Jevc9JlKkvtDZBifWWhnnu8StrV3m/YoCPAdT ISLvwZPm2wWRxjp0VXO3Kri6NwJXlXtgC1QnvVyUXmNWlX56j9D7WB77j+X9TGil6ErW CE6GbiN7BrwtzueYvGlnTLfp/DShfekYY7xVGKGtZKn50GoT3TP6RRvVIYh7LMXc3XDI nht2cFvxucSNf7J93q/zxtAMoZAGCsQA1419eyU7b773F9WLeJQ3Hec2LioPLsie7gjA 1i+g== Received: by 10.68.223.164 with SMTP id qv4mr9448830pbc.20.1346351946476; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:39:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dormouse.experts-exchange.com ([72.29.164.238]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ky8sm1989902pbc.43.2012.08.30.11.39.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:39:05 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Jason Helfman Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:36:48 -0700 From: Jason Helfman To: "apache@FreeBSD.org" Message-ID: <20120830183648.GA36263@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> References: <20120830174029.GM63706@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <503FAE12.8070201@FreeBSD.org> <503FB2A2.7080007@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <503FB2A2.7080007@gmx.de> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE amd64 Organization: The FreeBSD Project, http://www.freebsd.org X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! X-PGP-FingerPrint: 8E0D C457 9A0F C91C 23F3 0454 2059 9A63 4150 D3DC X-PGP-Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh/jgh.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnK6Ih7RxKqdWTONuDhwfWnevCqmmLdSc2I4E5FYIXYYaaydZpOai4TTr5QLBO3w+5vF1u9 Cc: Subject: Re: apache-2.2.22_6 question X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:39:07 -0000 On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 08:36:18PM +0200, olli hauer thus spake: >On 2012-08-30 20:16, Olli Hauer wrote: >> On 2012-08-30 19:40, Jason Helfman wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was wondering what implications there are of building apache-2.2.22_6 >>> against pcre version of 8.02? >>> >>> I believe a patch addressed a deprecated function of pcre, however at the >>> moment I am unable to update a snapshotted portstree to a current >>> version, or even move to a newer tree. >>> >>> I don't know if it would build with that patch, or without the patch, and if >>> that would be good, or not, and what implications there may be as a result. >>> >>> Many Thanks! >>> >>> -jgh >>> >> >> Hi Jason, >> >> exact, the bump and patch was done because pcre removed a (long) deprecated function. >> pcre-8.02 will full support the patch because the new api was in this version already >> the default. >> >> file pcre-8.02/pcreposix.c (around line 265) >> -------------------------------------------- >> preg->re_nsub = pcre_info((const pcre *)preg->re_pcre, NULL, NULL); >> return 0; >> } >> >> >> apache22/files/files/patch-server__util_pcre.c >> ---------------------------------------------- >> -preg->re_nsub = pcre_info((const pcre *)preg->re_pcre, NULL, NULL); >> +pcre_fullinfo((const pcre *)preg->re_pcre, NULL, >> + PCRE_INFO_CAPTURECOUNT, &(preg->re_nsub)); >> >> > >Ups, pcre_info != pcre_fullinfo. > >But pcre_fullinfo is already in 8.02 present, so I assume it will work with the patch. Is there any testing that we can do that would verify this? Perhaps doing any particular tests that would exercise the regular expression library? Thanks, again. -jgh -- Jason Helfman FreeBSD Committer | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh | The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 18:54:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F7B106566C; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:54:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.139.233.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F71C8FC15; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cde1100.uni.vrs [192.168.0.100]) (Authenticated sender: ohauer) by p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09F65208C3; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:54:09 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <503FB6D0.5050302@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:54:08 +0200 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "apache@FreeBSD.org" References: <20120830174029.GM63706@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <503FAE12.8070201@FreeBSD.org> <503FB2A2.7080007@gmx.de> <20120830183648.GA36263@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> In-Reply-To: <20120830183648.GA36263@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jason Helfman Subject: Re: apache-2.2.22_6 question X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "apache@FreeBSD.org" , ohauer@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:54:12 -0000 On 2012-08-30 20:36, Jason Helfman wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 08:36:18PM +0200, olli hauer thus spake: >> On 2012-08-30 20:16, Olli Hauer wrote: >>> On 2012-08-30 19:40, Jason Helfman wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I was wondering what implications there are of building apache-2.2.22_6 >>>> against pcre version of 8.02? >>>> >>>> I believe a patch addressed a deprecated function of pcre, however at the >>>> moment I am unable to update a snapshotted portstree to a current >>>> version, or even move to a newer tree. >>>> >>>> I don't know if it would build with that patch, or without the patch, and if >>>> that would be good, or not, and what implications there may be as a result. >>>> >>>> Many Thanks! >>>> >>>> -jgh >>>> >>> >>> Hi Jason, >>> >>> exact, the bump and patch was done because pcre removed a (long) deprecated function. >>> pcre-8.02 will full support the patch because the new api was in this version already >>> the default. >>> >>> file pcre-8.02/pcreposix.c (around line 265) >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> preg->re_nsub = pcre_info((const pcre *)preg->re_pcre, NULL, NULL); >>> return 0; >>> } >>> >>> >>> apache22/files/files/patch-server__util_pcre.c >>> ---------------------------------------------- >>> -preg->re_nsub = pcre_info((const pcre *)preg->re_pcre, NULL, NULL); >>> +pcre_fullinfo((const pcre *)preg->re_pcre, NULL, >>> + PCRE_INFO_CAPTURECOUNT, &(preg->re_nsub)); >>> >>> >> >> Ups, pcre_info != pcre_fullinfo. >> >> But pcre_fullinfo is already in 8.02 present, so I assume it will work with the patch. > > Is there any testing that we can do that would verify this? Perhaps doing > any particular tests that would exercise the regular expression library? > I'm not aware of any test, maybe mm@ (has done the pcre update and written the patch) knows if there is any impact with/without the patch and pcre-8.02 -- Regards, olli From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 31 15:10:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1AEC106564A; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:10:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85ACC8FC14; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7VFAIio030995; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:10:18 GMT (envelope-from edwin@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from edwin@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7VFAImX030991; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:10:18 GMT (envelope-from edwin) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:10:18 GMT Message-Id: <201208311510.q7VFAImX030991@freefall.freebsd.org> To: edwin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, apache@FreeBSD.org From: edwin@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/171210: [patch] www/mod_rivet -- DIO requires itcl X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:10:18 -0000 Synopsis: [patch] www/mod_rivet -- DIO requires itcl Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->apache Responsible-Changed-By: edwin Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Aug 31 15:10:18 UTC 2012 Responsible-Changed-Why: apache@ wants this port PRs (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=171210 From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 31 15:10:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7989106564A; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:10:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5238FC1A; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:10:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7VFAM6o031073; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:10:22 GMT (envelope-from edwin@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from edwin@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7VFAMcQ031069; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:10:22 GMT (envelope-from edwin) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:10:22 GMT Message-Id: <201208311510.q7VFAMcQ031069@freefall.freebsd.org> To: gahr@FreeBSD.org, edwin@FreeBSD.org, apache@FreeBSD.org From: edwin@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/171210: [patch] www/mod_rivet -- DIO requires itcl X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:10:23 -0000 Synopsis: [patch] www/mod_rivet -- DIO requires itcl State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: edwin State-Changed-When: Fri Aug 31 15:10:22 UTC 2012 State-Changed-Why: Awaiting maintainers feedback (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=171210 From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 31 15:20:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91D6106564A for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF41D8FC14 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7VFK3aw033134 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:20:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7VFK3hQ033133; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:20:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:20:03 GMT Message-Id: <201208311520.q7VFK3hQ033133@freefall.freebsd.org> To: apache@FreeBSD.org From: Edwin Groothuis Cc: Subject: Re: ports/171210: [patch] www/mod_rivet -- DIO requires itcl X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Edwin Groothuis List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:20:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/171210; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Edwin Groothuis To: cowbert@gmail.com Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/171210: [patch] www/mod_rivet -- DIO requires itcl Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:10:20 UT Maintainer of www/mod_rivet, Please note that PR ports/171210 has just been submitted. If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch and a committer will take care of it. The full text of the PR can be found at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/171210 -- Edwin Groothuis via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool edwin@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 1 17:15:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DBD6106566C; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 17:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.139.233.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1528FC17; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 17:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cde1100.uni.vrs [192.168.0.100]) (Authenticated sender: ohauer) by p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 664A5208C8; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 19:15:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <504242B1.10002@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 19:15:29 +0200 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "apache@FreeBSD.org" , FreeBSD Ports X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: apache22 options NG rewrite testers wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 17:15:38 -0000 Hi all, I need some testers specially on 9/10-current to test the www/apache22 optionsNG rewrite. I have a report from a 10-current user where we see a make regression, but it is not clear if the regression is in make or the ports framework therefore I need some more testers. What does the patch address - optons NG rewrite of bsd.apache.mk and apache22 - rename port to apache22 so we have no conflicts with upcoming apache24 (pkg install apache22) - apr/apr-util specific options are gone, apr/apu-util will be used now to control the build (THREADS, PGSQL, MYSQL ...) - PR 130479 - PR 153406 - PR 158565 - PR 167965 - PR 168769 - PR 165143 devel/apr1 long outstanding update and removal of PKGNAMESUFFIX The patch should be applied from /usr/ports (contains fixes for Mk/ www/ and devel/ ) http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/apache/apache22_optionsNG_2012-09-01.diff Thanks for your help, olli From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 1 17:45:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB2E1065678; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 17:45:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: from z.umatar.com (z.umatar.com [66.135.39.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD2CE8FC25; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 17:45:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from z.umatar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q81HjigZ072394; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 10:45:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: (from uzimac@localhost) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q81HjiSW072392; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 10:45:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) X-Authentication-Warning: z.umatar.com: uzimac set sender to uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com using -f From: "Waitman Gobble" To: Olli Hauer Message-Id: <1346521544.72387@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Originating-IP: 75.36.153.130 X-Mailer: Usermin 1.510 In-Reply-To: <504242B1.10002@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 10:45:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1346521544" Cc: FreeBSD Ports , "apache@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: apache22 options NG rewrite testers wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 17:45:46 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1346521544 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Olli Hauer wrote .. > Hi all, > > I need some testers specially on 9/10-current to test the www/apache22 > optionsNG rewrite. > > I have a report from a 10-current user where we see a make regression, but > it is not clear if the regression is in make or the ports framework > therefore I need some more testers. > > What does the patch address > - optons NG rewrite of bsd.apache.mk and apache22 > - rename port to apache22 so we have no conflicts with upcoming apache24 > (pkg install apache22) > - apr/apr-util specific options are gone, apr/apu-util will be used now > to control the build (THREADS, PGSQL, MYSQL ...) > - PR 130479 > - PR 153406 > - PR 158565 > - PR 167965 > - PR 168769 > > - PR 165143 > devel/apr1 long outstanding update and removal of PKGNAMESUFFIX > > The patch should be applied from /usr/ports > (contains fixes for Mk/ www/ and devel/ ) > > http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/apache/apache22_optionsNG_2012-09-01.diff > > Thanks for your help, > olli > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hi Olli, Looks like there have been quite a few updates since 8/11, last time I did a rebuild. Patch didn't work on my src... I'll take some time tomorrow to csup and rebuild and try out your patch. -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA --bound1346521544-- From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 1 17:56:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC59106564A; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 17:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.139.233.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297F28FC0C; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 17:56:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cde1100.uni.vrs [192.168.0.100]) (Authenticated sender: ohauer) by p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6B0B20491; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 19:55:57 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <50424C32.9070902@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 19:56:02 +0200 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Waitman Gobble References: <1346521544.72387@da3m0n8t3r.com> In-Reply-To: <1346521544.72387@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Ports , "apache@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: apache22 options NG rewrite testers wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 17:56:02 -0000 On 2012-09-01 19:45, Waitman Gobble wrote: > Olli Hauer wrote .. >> Hi all, >> >> I need some testers specially on 9/10-current to test the www/apache22 >> optionsNG rewrite. >> >> I have a report from a 10-current user where we see a make regression, but >> it is not clear if the regression is in make or the ports framework >> therefore I need some more testers. >> >> What does the patch address >> - optons NG rewrite of bsd.apache.mk and apache22 >> - rename port to apache22 so we have no conflicts with upcoming apache24 >> (pkg install apache22) >> - apr/apr-util specific options are gone, apr/apu-util will be used now >> to control the build (THREADS, PGSQL, MYSQL ...) >> - PR 130479 >> - PR 153406 >> - PR 158565 >> - PR 167965 >> - PR 168769 >> >> - PR 165143 >> devel/apr1 long outstanding update and removal of PKGNAMESUFFIX >> >> The patch should be applied from /usr/ports >> (contains fixes for Mk/ www/ and devel/ ) >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/apache/apache22_optionsNG_2012-09-01.diff >> >> Thanks for your help, >> olli > > Hi Olli, > > Looks like there have been quite a few updates since 8/11, last time I did a rebuild. Patch didn't work on my src... > I'll take some time tomorrow to csup and rebuild and try out your patch. > Thanks, I haven't tested the patches against csup ports there the $FreeBSD$ header is different, so I just shaped a tar archive. http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/apache/apache22_optNG.tar.bz2 -- Regards, olli From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 1 18:28:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CDC9106566B; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 18:28:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: from z.umatar.com (z.umatar.com [66.135.39.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750368FC14; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 18:28:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from z.umatar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q81ISrOR074123; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 11:28:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: (from uzimac@localhost) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q81ISrGX074122; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 11:28:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) X-Authentication-Warning: z.umatar.com: uzimac set sender to uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com using -f From: "Waitman Gobble" To: Olli Hauer Message-Id: <1346524133.74117@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Originating-IP: 75.36.153.130 X-Mailer: Usermin 1.510 In-Reply-To: <50424C32.9070902@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 11:28:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1346524133" Cc: FreeBSD Ports , "apache@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: apache22 options NG rewrite testers wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 18:28:54 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1346524133 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Olli Hauer wrote .. > On 2012-09-01 19:45, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > Olli Hauer wrote .. > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I need some testers specially on 9/10-current to test the www/apache22 > >> optionsNG rewrite. > >> > >> I have a report from a 10-current user where we see a make regression, but > >> it is not clear if the regression is in make or the ports framework > >> therefore I need some more testers. > >> > >> What does the patch address > >> - optons NG rewrite of bsd.apache.mk and apache22 > >> - rename port to apache22 so we have no conflicts with upcoming apache24 > >> (pkg install apache22) > >> - apr/apr-util specific options are gone, apr/apu-util will be used now > >> to control the build (THREADS, PGSQL, MYSQL ...) > >> - PR 130479 > >> - PR 153406 > >> - PR 158565 > >> - PR 167965 > >> - PR 168769 > >> > >> - PR 165143 > >> devel/apr1 long outstanding update and removal of PKGNAMESUFFIX > >> > >> The patch should be applied from /usr/ports > >> (contains fixes for Mk/ www/ and devel/ ) > >> > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/apache/apache22_optionsNG_2012-09-01.diff > >> > >> Thanks for your help, > >> olli > > > > Hi Olli, > > > > Looks like there have been quite a few updates since 8/11, last time I did a > rebuild. Patch didn't work on my src... > > I'll take some time tomorrow to csup and rebuild and try out your patch. > > > > Thanks, > > I haven't tested the patches against csup ports there the $FreeBSD$ header is different, > so I just shaped a tar archive. > http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/apache/apache22_optNG.tar.bz2 > > -- > Regards, > olli > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Thanks, I tried the following, no issues. machine - # uname -a FreeBSD hunny.waitman.net 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Sat Aug 11 13:25:18 PDT 2012 root@hunny.waitman.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KEYSHIA amd64 I did not previously have www/apache22 installed on this machine. replace devel/apr1 www/apache22 Mk/bsd.apache.mk # cd /usr/ports/www/apache22 # make -- OK # make install -- OK # make package -- OK # make deinstall -- OK # pkg_add apache22-2.2.22_7.tbz -- OK # make deinstall -- OK # pkg_add apache22-2.2.22_7.tbz -- OK # pkg_delete apache22-2.2.22_7 -- OK # make install -- OK # make readme -- OK # kldload accf_http # /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start -- OK # wget http://localhost --2012-09-01 11:23:22-- http://localhost/ Resolving localhost (localhost)... 127.0.0.1, ::1 Connecting to localhost (localhost)|127.0.0.1|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 44 [text/html] Saving to: `index.html' 100%[======================================>] 44 --.-K/s in 0s 2012-09-01 11:23:22 (6.60 MB/s) - `index.html' saved [44/44] # cat index.html

It works!

Is there anything you'd like me to test? I have another machine sitting here running 9 I can test if you like. But it's busy for the day transcoding a boatload of video, so I can do that one tomorrow if you likes. # uname -a FreeBSD kamira.waitman.net 9.1-RC1 FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 #0: Tue Aug 14 04:25:06 UTC 2012 root@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA --bound1346524133-- From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 1 18:54:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7E410657B9 for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 18:54:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C3C058FC15 for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 18:54:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Sep 2012 18:53:59 -0000 Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.0.100]) [87.139.233.65] by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 01 Sep 2012 20:53:59 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1956535 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18GClwoksUGdtqPGYDUrINflHovwhuu382gFQzo+u qvjn0Kotdc33sE Message-ID: <504259CB.4010004@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 20:54:03 +0200 From: olli hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Waitman Gobble References: <1346524133.74117@da3m0n8t3r.com> In-Reply-To: <1346524133.74117@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: FreeBSD Ports , "apache@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: apache22 options NG rewrite testers wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 18:54:03 -0000 On 2012-09-01 20:28, Waitman Gobble wrote: > Olli Hauer wrote .. >> On 2012-09-01 19:45, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>> Olli Hauer wrote .. >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I need some testers specially on 9/10-current to test the www/apache22 >>>> optionsNG rewrite. >>>> >>>> I have a report from a 10-current user where we see a make regression, but >>>> it is not clear if the regression is in make or the ports framework >>>> therefore I need some more testers. >>>> >>>> What does the patch address >>>> - optons NG rewrite of bsd.apache.mk and apache22 >>>> - rename port to apache22 so we have no conflicts with upcoming apache24 >>>> (pkg install apache22) >>>> - apr/apr-util specific options are gone, apr/apu-util will be used now >>>> to control the build (THREADS, PGSQL, MYSQL ...) >>>> - PR 130479 >>>> - PR 153406 >>>> - PR 158565 >>>> - PR 167965 >>>> - PR 168769 >>>> >>>> - PR 165143 >>>> devel/apr1 long outstanding update and removal of PKGNAMESUFFIX >>>> >>>> The patch should be applied from /usr/ports >>>> (contains fixes for Mk/ www/ and devel/ ) >>>> >>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/apache/apache22_optionsNG_2012-09-01.diff >>>> >>>> Thanks for your help, >>>> olli >>> >>> Hi Olli, >>> >>> Looks like there have been quite a few updates since 8/11, last time I did a >> rebuild. Patch didn't work on my src... >>> I'll take some time tomorrow to csup and rebuild and try out your patch. >>> >> >> Thanks, >> >> I haven't tested the patches against csup ports there the $FreeBSD$ header is different, >> so I just shaped a tar archive. >> http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/apache/apache22_optNG.tar.bz2 >> >> -- >> Regards, >> olli >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Thanks, > I tried the following, no issues. > machine - > # uname -a > FreeBSD hunny.waitman.net 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Sat Aug 11 13:25:18 PDT 2012 root@hunny.waitman.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KEYSHIA amd64 > > I did not previously have www/apache22 installed on this machine. > > > replace devel/apr1 www/apache22 Mk/bsd.apache.mk > > # cd /usr/ports/www/apache22 > # make -- OK > # make install -- OK > # make package -- OK > # make deinstall -- OK > # pkg_add apache22-2.2.22_7.tbz -- OK > # make deinstall -- OK > # pkg_add apache22-2.2.22_7.tbz -- OK > # pkg_delete apache22-2.2.22_7 -- OK > # make install -- OK > # make readme -- OK > > > # kldload accf_http > # /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start -- OK > # wget http://localhost > --2012-09-01 11:23:22-- http://localhost/ > Resolving localhost (localhost)... 127.0.0.1, ::1 > Connecting to localhost (localhost)|127.0.0.1|:80... connected. > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK > Length: 44 [text/html] > Saving to: `index.html' > > 100%[======================================>] 44 --.-K/s in 0s > > 2012-09-01 11:23:22 (6.60 MB/s) - `index.html' saved [44/44] > > # cat index.html >

It works!

> > > > Is there anything you'd like me to test? > > > I have another machine sitting here running 9 I can test if you like. But it's busy for the day transcoding a boatload of video, so I can do that one tomorrow if you likes. > > # uname -a > FreeBSD kamira.waitman.net 9.1-RC1 FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 #0: Tue Aug 14 04:25:06 UTC 2012 root@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > Hm yes, we found on a 10-current system a regression in case ALIAS, AUTHN_ALIAS, VHOST_ALIAS was selected. As soon you hit OK in 'make config' the line OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=ALIAS changed to OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=ALIAS in /var/db/ports/apache22/options Will be nice if you could 'grep ALIAS /var/db/ports/apache22/options' Adjust with 'make config' and grep again (or save the option file and do a diff) We investigate at the moment if this was a specific 10-current issue or an issue in the ports/options/apache framework. (but this will take some time longer because of 10 hours tz difference) Thanks, olli From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 1 19:06:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE59106564A; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 19:06:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: from z.umatar.com (z.umatar.com [66.135.39.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635B88FC16; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 19:06:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from z.umatar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q81J6cCi030159; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 12:06:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: (from uzimac@localhost) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q81J6cHa030158; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 12:06:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) X-Authentication-Warning: z.umatar.com: uzimac set sender to uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com using -f From: "Waitman Gobble" To: olli hauer Message-Id: <1346526398.30153@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Originating-IP: 75.36.153.130 X-Mailer: Usermin 1.510 In-Reply-To: <504259CB.4010004@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 12:06:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1346526398" Cc: FreeBSD Ports , "apache@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: apache22 options NG rewrite testers wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 19:06:39 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1346526398 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit olli hauer wrote .. > On 2012-09-01 20:28, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > Olli Hauer wrote .. > >> On 2012-09-01 19:45, Waitman Gobble wrote: > >>> Olli Hauer wrote .. > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> I need some testers specially on 9/10-current to test the www/apache22 > >>>> optionsNG rewrite. > >>>> > >>>> I have a report from a 10-current user where we see a make regression, but > >>>> it is not clear if the regression is in make or the ports framework > >>>> therefore I need some more testers. > >>>> > >>>> What does the patch address > >>>> - optons NG rewrite of bsd.apache.mk and apache22 > >>>> - rename port to apache22 so we have no conflicts with upcoming apache24 > >>>> (pkg install apache22) > >>>> - apr/apr-util specific options are gone, apr/apu-util will be used now > >>>> to control the build (THREADS, PGSQL, MYSQL ...) > >>>> - PR 130479 > >>>> - PR 153406 > >>>> - PR 158565 > >>>> - PR 167965 > >>>> - PR 168769 > >>>> > >>>> - PR 165143 > >>>> devel/apr1 long outstanding update and removal of PKGNAMESUFFIX > >>>> > >>>> The patch should be applied from /usr/ports > >>>> (contains fixes for Mk/ www/ and devel/ ) > >>>> > >>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/apache/apache22_optionsNG_2012-09-01.diff > >>>> > >>>> Thanks for your help, > >>>> olli > >>> > >>> Hi Olli, > >>> > >>> Looks like there have been quite a few updates since 8/11, last time I did > a > >> rebuild. Patch didn't work on my src... > >>> I'll take some time tomorrow to csup and rebuild and try out your patch. > >>> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> I haven't tested the patches against csup ports there the $FreeBSD$ header is > different, > >> so I just shaped a tar archive. > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/apache/apache22_optNG.tar.bz2 > >> > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> olli > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > Thanks, > > I tried the following, no issues. > > machine - > > # uname -a > > FreeBSD hunny.waitman.net 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Sat Aug 11 13:25:18 > PDT 2012 root@hunny.waitman.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KEYSHIA amd64 > > > > I did not previously have www/apache22 installed on this machine. > > > > > > replace devel/apr1 www/apache22 Mk/bsd.apache.mk > > > > # cd /usr/ports/www/apache22 > > # make -- OK > > # make install -- OK > > # make package -- OK > > # make deinstall -- OK > > # pkg_add apache22-2.2.22_7.tbz -- OK > > # make deinstall -- OK > > # pkg_add apache22-2.2.22_7.tbz -- OK > > # pkg_delete apache22-2.2.22_7 -- OK > > # make install -- OK > > # make readme -- OK > > > > > > # kldload accf_http > > # /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start -- OK > > # wget http://localhost > > --2012-09-01 11:23:22-- http://localhost/ > > Resolving localhost (localhost)... 127.0.0.1, ::1 > > Connecting to localhost (localhost)|127.0.0.1|:80... connected. > > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK > > Length: 44 [text/html] > > Saving to: `index.html' > > > > 100%[======================================>] 44 --.-K/s in 0s > > > > 2012-09-01 11:23:22 (6.60 MB/s) - `index.html' saved [44/44] > > > > # cat index.html > >

It works!

> > > > > > > > Is there anything you'd like me to test? > > > > > > I have another machine sitting here running 9 I can test if you like. But it's > busy for the day transcoding a boatload of video, so I can do that one tomorrow > if you likes. > > > > # uname -a > > FreeBSD kamira.waitman.net 9.1-RC1 FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 #0: Tue Aug 14 04:25:06 UTC > 2012 root@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > > > > Hm yes, we found on a 10-current system a regression in case ALIAS, AUTHN_ALIAS, > VHOST_ALIAS was selected. > As soon you hit OK in 'make config' the line > OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=ALIAS changed to > OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=ALIAS in /var/db/ports/apache22/options > > Will be nice if you could 'grep ALIAS /var/db/ports/apache22/options' > Adjust with 'make config' and grep again (or save the option file and do a diff) > > We investigate at the moment if this was a specific 10-current issue or an issue > in the ports/options/apache framework. > (but this will take some time longer because of 10 hours tz difference) > > Thanks, > olli > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" OK, I can do that... BUT those three options were 'already' selected when i did the test... # grep ALIAS /var/db/ports/apache22/options _FILE_COMPLETE_OPTIONS_LIST= AUTH_BASIC AUTH_DIGEST AUTHN_ALIAS AUTHN_ANON AUTHN_DBD AUTHN_DBM AUTHN_DEFAULT AUTHN_FILE AUTHZ_DBM AUTHZ_DEFAULT AUTHZ_GROUPFILE AUTHZ_HOST AUTHZ_OWNER AUTHZ_USER AUTHNZ_LDAP LDAP DBD CACHE DISK_CACHE FILE_CACHE MEM_CACHE DAV DAV_FS DAV_LOCK ACTIONS ALIAS ASIS AUTOINDEX CERN_META CGI CGID CHARSET_LITE DEFLATE DIR DUMPIO ENV EXPIRES HEADERS IMAGEMAP INCLUDE INFO LOG_CONFIG LOGIO MIME MIME_MAGIC NEGOTIATION REWRITE SETENVIF SPELING STATUS UNIQUE_ID USERDIR USERTRACK VHOST_ALIAS FILTER SUBSTITUTE VERSION SSL SUEXEC SUEXEC_RSRCLIMIT SUEXEC_USERDIR REQTIMEOUT PROXY BUCKETEER CASE_FILTER CASE_FILTER_IN EXT_FILTER LOG_FORENSIC OPTIONAL_HOOK_EXPORT OPTIONAL_HOOK_IMPORT OPTIONAL_FN_IMPORT OPTIONAL_FN_EXPORT IPV6 IPV4_ONLY IPV6_ONLY PROXY_AJP PROXY_BALANCER PROXY_CONNECT PROXY_FTP PROXY_HTTP PROXY_SCGI OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=AUTHN_ALIAS OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=ALIAS OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=VHOST_ALIAS Do you want me to 'deselect' them? Running 'make config' and leaving them selected doesn't change the options. here's 'make config' de-selecting those three options: # grep ALIAS /var/db/ports/apache22/options _FILE_COMPLETE_OPTIONS_LIST= AUTH_BASIC AUTH_DIGEST AUTHN_ALIAS AUTHN_ANON AUTHN_DBD AUTHN_DBM AUTHN_DEFAULT AUTHN_FILE AUTHZ_DBM AUTHZ_DEFAULT AUTHZ_GROUPFILE AUTHZ_HOST AUTHZ_OWNER AUTHZ_USER AUTHNZ_LDAP LDAP DBD CACHE DISK_CACHE FILE_CACHE MEM_CACHE DAV DAV_FS DAV_LOCK ACTIONS ALIAS ASIS AUTOINDEX CERN_META CGI CGID CHARSET_LITE DEFLATE DIR DUMPIO ENV EXPIRES HEADERS IMAGEMAP INCLUDE INFO LOG_CONFIG LOGIO MIME MIME_MAGIC NEGOTIATION REWRITE SETENVIF SPELING STATUS UNIQUE_ID USERDIR USERTRACK VHOST_ALIAS FILTER SUBSTITUTE VERSION SSL SUEXEC SUEXEC_RSRCLIMIT SUEXEC_USERDIR REQTIMEOUT PROXY BUCKETEER CASE_FILTER CASE_FILTER_IN EXT_FILTER LOG_FORENSIC OPTIONAL_HOOK_EXPORT OPTIONAL_HOOK_IMPORT OPTIONAL_FN_IMPORT OPTIONAL_FN_EXPORT IPV6 IPV4_ONLY IPV6_ONLY PROXY_AJP PROXY_BALANCER PROXY_CONNECT PROXY_FTP PROXY_HTTP PROXY_SCGI OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=AUTHN_ALIAS OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=ALIAS OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=VHOST_ALIAS and 'make config' RE-selecting the three options: # grep ALIAS /var/db/ports/apache22/options _FILE_COMPLETE_OPTIONS_LIST= AUTH_BASIC AUTH_DIGEST AUTHN_ALIAS AUTHN_ANON AUTHN_DBD AUTHN_DBM AUTHN_DEFAULT AUTHN_FILE AUTHZ_DBM AUTHZ_DEFAULT AUTHZ_GROUPFILE AUTHZ_HOST AUTHZ_OWNER AUTHZ_USER AUTHNZ_LDAP LDAP DBD CACHE DISK_CACHE FILE_CACHE MEM_CACHE DAV DAV_FS DAV_LOCK ACTIONS ALIAS ASIS AUTOINDEX CERN_META CGI CGID CHARSET_LITE DEFLATE DIR DUMPIO ENV EXPIRES HEADERS IMAGEMAP INCLUDE INFO LOG_CONFIG LOGIO MIME MIME_MAGIC NEGOTIATION REWRITE SETENVIF SPELING STATUS UNIQUE_ID USERDIR USERTRACK VHOST_ALIAS FILTER SUBSTITUTE VERSION SSL SUEXEC SUEXEC_RSRCLIMIT SUEXEC_USERDIR REQTIMEOUT PROXY BUCKETEER CASE_FILTER CASE_FILTER_IN EXT_FILTER LOG_FORENSIC OPTIONAL_HOOK_EXPORT OPTIONAL_HOOK_IMPORT OPTIONAL_FN_IMPORT OPTIONAL_FN_EXPORT IPV6 IPV4_ONLY IPV6_ONLY PROXY_AJP PROXY_BALANCER PROXY_CONNECT PROXY_FTP PROXY_HTTP PROXY_SCGI OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=AUTHN_ALIAS OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=ALIAS OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=VHOST_ALIAS -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA --bound1346526398-- From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 1 19:23:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF75F1065673 for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 19:23:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32B168FC12 for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 19:23:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Sep 2012 19:23:43 -0000 Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.0.100]) [87.139.233.65] by mail.gmx.net (mp024) with SMTP; 01 Sep 2012 21:23:43 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1956535 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19BmnAH6tJB4iLxnybPnQe6zTsTSARYT4904I5qvJ 6HiwMQTUTw1Uqz Message-ID: <504260C4.3010602@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 21:23:48 +0200 From: olli hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Waitman Gobble References: <1346526398.30153@da3m0n8t3r.com> In-Reply-To: <1346526398.30153@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: FreeBSD Ports , "apache@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: apache22 options NG rewrite testers wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 19:23:45 -0000 On 2012-09-01 21:06, Waitman Gobble wrote: > olli hauer wrote .. >> On 2012-09-01 20:28, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>> Olli Hauer wrote .. >>>> On 2012-09-01 19:45, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>>>> Olli Hauer wrote .. >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I need some testers specially on 9/10-current to test the www/apache22 >>>>>> optionsNG rewrite. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have a report from a 10-current user where we see a make regression, but >>>>>> it is not clear if the regression is in make or the ports framework >>>>>> therefore I need some more testers. >>>>>> >>>>>> What does the patch address >>>>>> - optons NG rewrite of bsd.apache.mk and apache22 >>>>>> - rename port to apache22 so we have no conflicts with upcoming apache24 >>>>>> (pkg install apache22) >>>>>> - apr/apr-util specific options are gone, apr/apu-util will be used now >>>>>> to control the build (THREADS, PGSQL, MYSQL ...) >>>>>> - PR 130479 >>>>>> - PR 153406 >>>>>> - PR 158565 >>>>>> - PR 167965 >>>>>> - PR 168769 >>>>>> >>>>>> - PR 165143 >>>>>> devel/apr1 long outstanding update and removal of PKGNAMESUFFIX >>>>>> >>>>>> The patch should be applied from /usr/ports >>>>>> (contains fixes for Mk/ www/ and devel/ ) >>>>>> >>>>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/apache/apache22_optionsNG_2012-09-01.diff >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for your help, >>>>>> olli >>>>> >>>>> Hi Olli, >>>>> >>>>> Looks like there have been quite a few updates since 8/11, last time I did >> a >>>> rebuild. Patch didn't work on my src... >>>>> I'll take some time tomorrow to csup and rebuild and try out your patch. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> I haven't tested the patches against csup ports there the $FreeBSD$ header is >> different, >>>> so I just shaped a tar archive. >>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/apache/apache22_optNG.tar.bz2 >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> olli >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> I tried the following, no issues. >>> machine - >>> # uname -a >>> FreeBSD hunny.waitman.net 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Sat Aug 11 13:25:18 >> PDT 2012 root@hunny.waitman.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KEYSHIA amd64 >>> >>> I did not previously have www/apache22 installed on this machine. >>> >>> >>> replace devel/apr1 www/apache22 Mk/bsd.apache.mk >>> >>> # cd /usr/ports/www/apache22 >>> # make -- OK >>> # make install -- OK >>> # make package -- OK >>> # make deinstall -- OK >>> # pkg_add apache22-2.2.22_7.tbz -- OK >>> # make deinstall -- OK >>> # pkg_add apache22-2.2.22_7.tbz -- OK >>> # pkg_delete apache22-2.2.22_7 -- OK >>> # make install -- OK >>> # make readme -- OK >>> >>> >>> # kldload accf_http >>> # /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start -- OK >>> # wget http://localhost >>> --2012-09-01 11:23:22-- http://localhost/ >>> Resolving localhost (localhost)... 127.0.0.1, ::1 >>> Connecting to localhost (localhost)|127.0.0.1|:80... connected. >>> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK >>> Length: 44 [text/html] >>> Saving to: `index.html' >>> >>> 100%[======================================>] 44 --.-K/s in 0s >>> >>> 2012-09-01 11:23:22 (6.60 MB/s) - `index.html' saved [44/44] >>> >>> # cat index.html >>>

It works!

>>> >>> >>> >>> Is there anything you'd like me to test? >>> >>> >>> I have another machine sitting here running 9 I can test if you like. But it's >> busy for the day transcoding a boatload of video, so I can do that one tomorrow >> if you likes. >>> >>> # uname -a >>> FreeBSD kamira.waitman.net 9.1-RC1 FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 #0: Tue Aug 14 04:25:06 UTC >> 2012 root@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 >>> >>> >> >> Hm yes, we found on a 10-current system a regression in case ALIAS, AUTHN_ALIAS, >> VHOST_ALIAS was selected. >> As soon you hit OK in 'make config' the line >> OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=ALIAS changed to >> OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=ALIAS in /var/db/ports/apache22/options >> >> Will be nice if you could 'grep ALIAS /var/db/ports/apache22/options' >> Adjust with 'make config' and grep again (or save the option file and do a diff) >> >> We investigate at the moment if this was a specific 10-current issue or an issue >> in the ports/options/apache framework. >> (but this will take some time longer because of 10 hours tz difference) >> >> Thanks, >> olli >> > > OK, I can do that... BUT those three options were 'already' selected when i did the test... snip ... So it seems more and more the reported issue is a local one. Thanks, olli From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 1 23:48:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07A3106564A; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 23:48:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: from z.umatar.com (z.umatar.com [66.135.39.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1B18FC0C; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 23:48:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from z.umatar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q81NmipH015841; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 16:48:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: (from uzimac@localhost) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q81Nmi5t015840; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 16:48:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) X-Authentication-Warning: z.umatar.com: uzimac set sender to uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com using -f From: "Waitman Gobble" To: olli hauer Message-Id: <1346543324.15749@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Originating-IP: 75.36.153.130 X-Mailer: Usermin 1.510 In-Reply-To: <504260C4.3010602@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 16:48:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1346543324" Cc: FreeBSD Ports , "apache@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: apache22 options NG rewrite testers wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 23:48:46 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1346543324 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit olli hauer wrote .. > On 2012-09-01 21:06, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > olli hauer wrote .. > >> On 2012-09-01 20:28, Waitman Gobble wrote: > >>> Olli Hauer wrote .. > >>>> On 2012-09-01 19:45, Waitman Gobble wrote: > >>>>> Olli Hauer wrote .. > >>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I need some testers specially on 9/10-current to test the www/apache22 > >>>>>> optionsNG rewrite. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I have a report from a 10-current user where we see a make regression, but > >>>>>> it is not clear if the regression is in make or the ports framework > >>>>>> therefore I need some more testers. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What does the patch address > >>>>>> - optons NG rewrite of bsd.apache.mk and apache22 > >>>>>> - rename port to apache22 so we have no conflicts with upcoming apache24 > >>>>>> (pkg install apache22) > >>>>>> - apr/apr-util specific options are gone, apr/apu-util will be used now > >>>>>> to control the build (THREADS, PGSQL, MYSQL ...) > >>>>>> - PR 130479 > >>>>>> - PR 153406 > >>>>>> - PR 158565 > >>>>>> - PR 167965 > >>>>>> - PR 168769 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> - PR 165143 > >>>>>> devel/apr1 long outstanding update and removal of PKGNAMESUFFIX > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The patch should be applied from /usr/ports > >>>>>> (contains fixes for Mk/ www/ and devel/ ) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/apache/apache22_optionsNG_2012-09-01.diff > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks for your help, > >>>>>> olli > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Olli, > >>>>> > >>>>> Looks like there have been quite a few updates since 8/11, last time I did > >> a > >>>> rebuild. Patch didn't work on my src... > >>>>> I'll take some time tomorrow to csup and rebuild and try out your patch. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> > >>>> I haven't tested the patches against csup ports there the $FreeBSD$ header > is > >> different, > >>>> so I just shaped a tar archive. > >>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/apache/apache22_optNG.tar.bz2 > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Regards, > >>>> olli > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> I tried the following, no issues. > >>> machine - > >>> # uname -a > >>> FreeBSD hunny.waitman.net 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Sat Aug 11 > 13:25:18 > >> PDT 2012 root@hunny.waitman.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KEYSHIA amd64 > >>> > >>> I did not previously have www/apache22 installed on this machine. > >>> > >>> > >>> replace devel/apr1 www/apache22 Mk/bsd.apache.mk > >>> > >>> # cd /usr/ports/www/apache22 > >>> # make -- OK > >>> # make install -- OK > >>> # make package -- OK > >>> # make deinstall -- OK > >>> # pkg_add apache22-2.2.22_7.tbz -- OK > >>> # make deinstall -- OK > >>> # pkg_add apache22-2.2.22_7.tbz -- OK > >>> # pkg_delete apache22-2.2.22_7 -- OK > >>> # make install -- OK > >>> # make readme -- OK > >>> > >>> > >>> # kldload accf_http > >>> # /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start -- OK > >>> # wget http://localhost > >>> --2012-09-01 11:23:22-- http://localhost/ > >>> Resolving localhost (localhost)... 127.0.0.1, ::1 > >>> Connecting to localhost (localhost)|127.0.0.1|:80... connected. > >>> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK > >>> Length: 44 [text/html] > >>> Saving to: `index.html' > >>> > >>> 100%[======================================>] 44 --.-K/s in 0s > >>> > >>> 2012-09-01 11:23:22 (6.60 MB/s) - `index.html' saved [44/44] > >>> > >>> # cat index.html > >>>

It works!

> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Is there anything you'd like me to test? > >>> > >>> > >>> I have another machine sitting here running 9 I can test if you like. But it's > >> busy for the day transcoding a boatload of video, so I can do that one tomorrow > >> if you likes. > >>> > >>> # uname -a > >>> FreeBSD kamira.waitman.net 9.1-RC1 FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 #0: Tue Aug 14 04:25:06 > UTC > >> 2012 root@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > >>> > >>> > >> > >> Hm yes, we found on a 10-current system a regression in case ALIAS, AUTHN_ALIAS, > >> VHOST_ALIAS was selected. > >> As soon you hit OK in 'make config' the line > >> OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=ALIAS changed to > >> OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=ALIAS in /var/db/ports/apache22/options > >> > >> Will be nice if you could 'grep ALIAS /var/db/ports/apache22/options' > >> Adjust with 'make config' and grep again (or save the option file and do a diff) > >> > >> We investigate at the moment if this was a specific 10-current issue or an issue > >> in the ports/options/apache framework. > >> (but this will take some time longer because of 10 hours tz difference) > >> > >> Thanks, > >> olli > >> > > > > OK, I can do that... BUT those three options were 'already' selected when i did > the test... > > snip ... > > > So it seems more and more the reported issue is a local one. > > Thanks, > olli > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I agree. So you *don't* need testing on my 9 machine, right? -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA --bound1346543324--