Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 10 Mar 2012 18:55:07 -0800
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Offtopic: Linus on binary compatibility
Message-ID:  <CAJ-VmonCXXh1pcu2TeUvFYZ8tn6Fe8%2B27fJsXbHJw7S9s6zrKQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <jjgk1g$rhb$1@dough.gmane.org>
References:  <jjgk1g$rhb$1@dough.gmane.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10 March 2012 14:19, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/8/495
>
> Awww, how cute, the little OS is growing up :)
>
> Seriously, FreeBSD's ability to run binaries compiled on 3.x on 9.x is
> incredibly awesome!

.. and someone should write an lkml article on the challenges in doing
exactly that.



Adrian

> Now it's only a matter of time when Linus gets it that the kernel ABI
> should also fall under such rules, and in just a few short years we will
> have another usable / non-broken OS ;)
>
> [end tongue-in-cheek transmission]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmonCXXh1pcu2TeUvFYZ8tn6Fe8%2B27fJsXbHJw7S9s6zrKQ>