From owner-freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 17:05:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1BD106564A for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:05:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F2A8FC17 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iagz16 with SMTP id z16so1898537iag.13 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:05:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=6PwdxjhgOUmO7HuFMdd+4XQY5ahdIV2e1g6IqGMIy9Y=; b=m7D+mHFW85ilBq3n2b4NPY0Cheppv9foFT10BA/11ZZZqASM+sjOUDMB6gw+1nxpXw CnJq0QbINZMxg9IRMJOa5eWiD2jCS9O6rEy8Xl/Bo2dwjXVxuoIoeSQ5ADExg/eJmDEP UQuqucC86RAsrvjGhAGQloTWuaJC5GPMDWKuw= Received: by 10.42.246.71 with SMTP id lx7mr4373389icb.54.1326559308431; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:41:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.207.7 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:41:17 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Rees Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 16:41:17 +0000 Message-ID: To: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Gnats port disappeared?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Coordination of the Problem Report handling effort." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:05:39 -0000 Hey Mark, Got a bit of a shock: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/databases/gnats/Attic/Makefile Did you know about this? It's innocent and reasonable, but possibly a mistake. I was going to prepare a patch for GNATS so it didn't get confused by subjects like Fwd: Re: ports/152537: [patch] database/postgresql90-server no longer needs Would there be interest in such a patch? Would you like the port resurrected, or should I just let you use a local copy? Chris