Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:18:41 -0800
From:      Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>
To:        Super Bisquit <superbisquit@gmail.com>
Cc:        cluster@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Tinderbox <tinderbox@freebsd.org>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc
Message-ID:  <CAGH67wQdzUaccUieU=bgNJk2WxRKb%2BM--7=n7V0O1z1BaAkbnQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA%2BWntOvfogO7Z8tL_9x6rnd66xyDQTc2tkYqxFHG2G4A9H-j7A@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201201030015.q030FwC1070840@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca> <CA%2BWntOvfogO7Z8tL_9x6rnd66xyDQTc2tkYqxFHG2G4A9H-j7A@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Super Bisquit <superbisquit@gmail.com> wrote:
> I still say that the system should be built natively on powerpc equipment.

    That's not relevant to these errors. For some odd reason tinderbox
takes 1-2 iterations to reach equilibrium when someone makes a data
structure change, even a change to a header and C file are done in the
same commit. It would be really nice to figure out what the issue is
because this is a regular occurrence that pops up on the current@ and
architecture specific mailing lists.
Thanks,
-Garrett



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGH67wQdzUaccUieU=bgNJk2WxRKb%2BM--7=n7V0O1z1BaAkbnQ>