From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 4 16:59:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA39289; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 16:59:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onyx.glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:c200::face]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D428FC0C; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 16:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:8:1205:2:2:0:100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by onyx.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F29723F645; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 11:59:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 11:59:34 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9?= Ladan Subject: Re: authors.ent and developers.ent ? Message-ID: <20121104165934.GB1343@glenbarber.us> References: <5095AF77.2070908@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5095AF77.2070908@freebsd.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FBSD Doc project X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 16:59:38 -0000 --UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 12:57:43AM +0100, Ren=E9 Ladan wrote: > Hi, >=20 > author entities are defined both in authors.ent (with email address) and= =20 > developers.ent (without email address). The latter is used in e.g.=20 > htdocs/administration.xml, resulting in cumbersome lines like >=20 >
  • &a.name; < href=3D"mailto:name@FreeBSD.org">name@FreeBSD.org>
  • >=20 > where just >=20 >
  • &a.name;
  • would be clearer. >=20 > So would there be some way to merge these two files (both docbook-wise=20 > and content-wise) to avoid having to maintain two files and avoiding=20 > cumbersome lines? >=20 I'm a bit baffled by this, to be honest. Perhaps we can merge these files together, and have each developer entity consist of two lines, one for name only, one for name + email? Something like this, maybe? gjb@FreeBSD.org"> This would allow us to keep the current multi-format entries, and consolidate them into one file. Thoughts? Glen PS: That idea is conceptual, I haven't actually tried this change. --UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQlp72AAoJEFJPDDeguUaju48H/jVDepFjZ7flPTmhiPp5AFMi q2IfW8lIk4kIwbi5vgs8x7gYcWjYvavySssUXWCwJ2bxcYD1YSkO85qa1emT/F/t W2ZmTbmvrAFzKBLhHcgCDdHgxCwaaWWC/5qQzmvyEMPHB0aOfEcdKx4BDfuNET2d uJp+uA/vTjo9acAhI1Hf7pvB4ocpOux9KLfLEhQERJmWzvxFwEi5CproYrRRzvEO YgApaCFo4et6bgI9p+uCF0LHUoh7ZAq73jDsB9XkV13zeOBUu8zPwCe3Ww9JlZPp 7ivRJb5gMcqMSDHKyfJuXIPrLO99KUAckEnMeDIp7r8DleQPojDfRU2UlqjaHBw= =cMri -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB--