From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 11:07:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BD61065675 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:07:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2968FC21 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:07:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q09B716S042148 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:07:01 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q09B71BC042146 for freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:07:01 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:07:01 GMT Message-Id: <201201091107.q09B71BC042146@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:07:02 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/159646 emulation [linux] [patch] bump Linux version in linuxulator f kern/156691 emulation [vmware] [panic] panic when using hard disks as RAW de o kern/156353 emulation [ibcs2] ibcs2 binaries that execute on 4.x not working o kern/155577 emulation [boot] BTX halted after install. Reboot during install o kern/155040 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux recvfrom doesn't handle proto fa o kern/153990 emulation [hyper-v]: Will not install into Hyper-V on Server 200 o kern/153887 emulation [linux] Linux emulator not understand STB_GNU_UNIQUE b o kern/153243 emulation [ibcs2] Seg fault whne running COFF binary using iBCS2 o kern/151714 emulation [linux] print/acroread9 not usable due to lack of supp a bin/150262 emulation [patch] truss(1) -f doesn't follow descendants of the a kern/150186 emulation [parallels] [panic] Parallels Desktop: CDROM disconnec o ports/148097 emulation [patch] suggested addition to linux_base-* packages to o ports/148096 emulation emulators/linux_base-* can not be built from ports on o kern/147793 emulation [vmware] [panic] cdrom handling, panic, possible race o kern/146237 emulation [linux] Linux binaries not reading directories mounted p kern/144584 emulation [linprocfs][patch] bogus values in linprocfs o ports/142837 emulation [patch] emulators/linux_base-* packages fails to insta o kern/140156 emulation [linux] cdparanoia fails to read drive data f kern/138944 emulation [parallels] [regression] Parallels no longer works in o kern/138880 emulation [linux] munmap segfaults after linux_mmap2 stresstest o ports/135337 emulation [PATCH] emulators/linux_base-f10: incorrect bash usage s kern/133144 emulation [linux] linuxulator 2.6 crashes with nvidias libGL.so. o kern/129169 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux Emulation ENOTCONN error using n o kern/126232 emulation [linux] Linux ioctl TCGETS (0x5401) always fails o kern/86619 emulation [linux] linux emulator interacts oddly with cp a kern/72920 emulation [linux] path "prefixing" is not done on unix domain so o kern/41543 emulation [patch] [request] easier wine/w23 support o kern/39201 emulation [linux] [patch] ptrace(2) and rfork(RFLINUXTHPN) confu o kern/36952 emulation [patch] [linux] ldd(1) command of linux does not work o kern/11165 emulation [ibcs2] IBCS2 doesn't work correctly with PID_MAX 9999 30 problems total. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 18:16:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C9310656D0; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:16:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CF68FC22; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbdt14 with SMTP id dt14so1795899wgb.1 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:16:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=3J91wM8haOdinhrsTBvcGa4AvK2QKBPemFEa4wmGxds=; b=m4QyvpbBk/tV3Zq0p2nu+aV1SpBAZY2hIi86axHAefzcDK5G1s2UbJxCXxqcvkJ9dO S2UhuI4KmyNLaez9E3LQ34nec3oYQr/Io268Sm98I2ea10+gqGqj0VF0gDWXYycUjJDv b6zt4eS8vTEvhFFUcR8XwBYFi85yXiOHm+Kaw= Received: by 10.180.95.199 with SMTP id dm7mr6569551wib.9.1326132963183; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:16:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.dg (41-135-148-93.dsl.mweb.co.za. [41.135.148.93]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g11sm46071369wbo.6.2012.01.09.10.16.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:16:02 -0800 (PST) From: David Naylor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 20:17:14 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-RC2; KDE/4.7.1; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4108101.g2rYJc9dk8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201092017.19776.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.3.36 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:16:05 -0000 --nextPart4108101.g2rYJc9dk8 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.3.36 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. =20 There are many reports that wine does not work with a clang compiled world= =20 (help in fixing this problem is appreciated as it affects quite a few users= ). =20 The patch [3] for nVidia users is now included in the package and is run on= =20 installation (if the relevant files are accessable). Please read the=20 installation messages for further information. =20 Regards, David [1]=20 MD5 (freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.3.36,1.tbz) =3D 019cdde0ff7fad7dc877ed1e3bc3c= 481 MD5 (freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.3.36,1.txz) =3D 7fe1bbd75c8c6af1d3fe6f0a03841= fa2 [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 [3] The patch is located at /usr/local/share/wine/patch-nvidia.sh --nextPart4108101.g2rYJc9dk8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk8LLy8ACgkQUaaFgP9pFrKrpwCfVS8oG8EBEd/sQCFZ8BYfTMGE SAsAn0CRy0f7FX1RCg2qqLQ3EaygwD8s =S9Wh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4108101.g2rYJc9dk8-- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 18:20:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C0C106566C for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:20:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from break19@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29678FC22 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl9 with SMTP id l9so1888060yen.13 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:20:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YLOZIbUiF/W1O56kno2NirglIEW/Tm6A180REliqQgM=; b=g5LH/bsSTuNSLhF+Q++JBNdmE9ie8Xp/b3Am+ZCRcygbMzEieDrH8GKYMrwjrwP23B wFjQgxITnY/4hIA3dLmTTbUbkxOOjuy6IsBiZQvQMwy5Q2gJLQmYVQgBapC+U3GjJlIF QJrm8eVHA81Vr4AgdTa4Pi08OPvbGMMmMUuZo= Received: by 10.236.173.202 with SMTP id v50mr21951115yhl.102.1326133200073; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:20:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.4.45] (c-98-230-64-224.hsd1.al.comcast.net. [98.230.64.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u9sm166307337anh.20.2012.01.09.10.19.58 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:19:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F0B2FC4.7090002@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:19:48 -0600 From: Chuck Burns User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120106 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <201201092017.19776.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201201092017.19776.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.3.36 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:20:01 -0000 On 01/09/12 12:17, David Naylor wrote: > Hi, > > Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.3.36 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. > > There are many reports that wine does not work with a clang compiled world > (help in fixing this problem is appreciated as it affects quite a few users). > > The patch [3] for nVidia users is now included in the package and is run on > installation (if the relevant files are accessable). Please read the > installation messages for further information. > > Regards, > > David > > [1] > MD5 (freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.3.36,1.tbz) = 019cdde0ff7fad7dc877ed1e3bc3c481 > MD5 (freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.3.36,1.txz) = 7fe1bbd75c8c6af1d3fe6f0a03841fa2 > [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 > [3] The patch is located at /usr/local/share/wine/patch-nvidia.sh Have you put any thought into getting both wine and wine64 (for Wow64 apps) working? There have been more than a few people hopping onto IRC asking about wine64 (full 64bit wine) -- Chuck Burns The Southern Libertarian http://www.thesouthernlibertarian.com/ From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 16:48:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEBDB1065672 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:48:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764EC8FC15 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:48:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhr1 with SMTP id hr1so5558834wib.13 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:48:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=InaJx8YlxCxMpAKPj3zhC/EjEYlkrRTtoMr4sRFSFdI=; b=qUEmNgHWxswf20Mx0Z8t8RhzxaCt/Vj98UiookD1xTHxVSrJgEmgNJeZOyUooA2rXc NOmxU2wpFE+A0z9mxVjLk99wL6GznQbBKxwk/MhI4WJW/m79lVmT/MXu4exwM53NsdUv 8lTOU6EbbGEy2WuR44QqQIth+utDTmgR+v/Ro= Received: by 10.180.93.193 with SMTP id cw1mr36308192wib.5.1326214094306; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:48:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.dg (41-135-148-93.dsl.mweb.co.za. [41.135.148.93]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k33sm41861386wbo.5.2012.01.10.08.48.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:48:12 -0800 (PST) From: David Naylor To: Chuck Burns Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:49:26 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-RC2; KDE/4.7.1; amd64; ; ) References: <201201092017.19776.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> <4F0B2FC4.7090002@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F0B2FC4.7090002@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2676245.VDDAadqoPJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201101849.29845.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.3.36 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:48:16 -0000 --nextPart2676245.VDDAadqoPJ Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday, 9 January 2012 20:19:48 Chuck Burns wrote: > On 01/09/12 12:17, David Naylor wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.3.36 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. > >=20 > > There are many reports that wine does not work with a clang compiled > > world (help in fixing this problem is appreciated as it affects quite a > > few users). > >=20 > > The patch [3] for nVidia users is now included in the package and is run > > on installation (if the relevant files are accessable). Please read the > > installation messages for further information. > >=20 > > Regards, > >=20 > > David > >=20 > > [1] > >=20 > > MD5 (freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.3.36,1.tbz) =3D > > 019cdde0ff7fad7dc877ed1e3bc3c481 MD5 > > (freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.3.36,1.txz) =3D > > 7fe1bbd75c8c6af1d3fe6f0a03841fa2 > >=20 > > [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 > > [3] The patch is located at /usr/local/share/wine/patch-nvidia.sh >=20 > Have you put any thought into getting both wine and wine64 (for Wow64 > apps) working? There have been more than a few people hopping onto IRC > asking about wine64 (full 64bit wine) I wasn't aware of WoW64 (and how it will make my packages redundent :->). = I=20 see there are two wiki pages: + http://wiki.winehq.org/Wine64 + http://wiki.winehq.org/Wine64ForPackagers The latter makes this statement "Wine 64bit works at the moment only on=20 Linux." which would indicate that, at this stage, FreeBSD is precluded. Th= at,=20 however, is just my speculation. =20 To answer your question directly, I have put no thought or effort into wine= 64. =20 --nextPart2676245.VDDAadqoPJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk8MbBkACgkQUaaFgP9pFrIh1gCghzswqMbzb9pgU/6DsPxKyole /WUAoICBOy6Nhys0XCNfLHUJw8Fv8Uch =5SIp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2676245.VDDAadqoPJ-- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 23:20:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786AA106564A for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:20:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from break19@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F8C18FC0C for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iazz13 with SMTP id z13so217178iaz.13 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:20:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=veAXqY21edqM1O/F46gcXy1a8zr6YmfbHpgZ3mK1S3g=; b=X+nBq8HEwzX6/ih3jFngXjiRW+/E6+yO1CQavlgY79f5b+tEMORvAbw3RH64PN82+0 h5MHcn5yHE4dNWYFxbxwQqbEDdTCLIGwK7OWlYz2QMKD/GAA6KO8IMXf/17pxBm3Xe4Y 7Axxqa4/lEpEWQ7CaP05jzLxr/cWJCzTYY5Gk= Received: by 10.50.135.1 with SMTP id po1mr4485571igb.26.1326237608477; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:20:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.4.45] (c-98-230-64-224.hsd1.al.comcast.net. [98.230.64.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r18sm268108276ibh.4.2012.01.10.15.20.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:20:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F0CC7A4.4010707@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:20:04 -0600 From: Chuck Burns User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120106 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Naylor References: <201201092017.19776.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> <4F0B2FC4.7090002@gmail.com> <201201101849.29845.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201201101849.29845.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.3.36 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:20:09 -0000 On 01/10/12 10:49, David Naylor wrote: > I wasn't aware of WoW64 (and how it will make my packages redundent :->). I > see there are two wiki pages: > + http://wiki.winehq.org/Wine64 > + http://wiki.winehq.org/Wine64ForPackagers > > The latter makes this statement "Wine 64bit works at the moment only on > Linux." which would indicate that, at this stage, FreeBSD is precluded. That, > however, is just my speculation. > > To answer your question directly, I have put no thought or effort into wine64. There is still a need for the 32bit wine, as the wow64 build will ONLY run 64bit windows apps, so for the majority of applications and games, we'll still need the 32bit wine. -- Chuck Burns The Southern Libertarian http://www.thesouthernlibertarian.com/ From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 16:35:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46F4106566C for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:35:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@lispworks.com) Received: from lwfs1-cam.cam.lispworks.com (mail.lispworks.com [193.34.186.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0F38FC16 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from higson.cam.lispworks.com (higson [192.168.1.7]) by lwfs1-cam.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q0BGOMBv091571; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:24:22 GMT (envelope-from martin@lispworks.com) Received: from higson.cam.lispworks.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by higson.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.4) id q0BGOMxs030096; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:24:22 GMT Received: (from martin@localhost) by higson.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q0BGOLlk030092; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:24:21 GMT Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:24:21 GMT Message-Id: <201201111624.q0BGOLlk030092@higson.cam.lispworks.com> From: Martin Simmons To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <4F0CC7A4.4010707@gmail.com> (message from Chuck Burns on Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:20:04 -0600) References: <201201092017.19776.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> <4F0B2FC4.7090002@gmail.com> <201201101849.29845.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> <4F0CC7A4.4010707@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.3.36 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:35:24 -0000 >>>>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:20:04 -0600, Chuck Burns said: > > On 01/10/12 10:49, David Naylor wrote: > > I wasn't aware of WoW64 (and how it will make my packages redundent :->). I > > see there are two wiki pages: > > + http://wiki.winehq.org/Wine64 > > + http://wiki.winehq.org/Wine64ForPackagers > > > > The latter makes this statement "Wine 64bit works at the moment only on > > Linux." which would indicate that, at this stage, FreeBSD is precluded. That, > > however, is just my speculation. > > > > To answer your question directly, I have put no thought or effort into wine64. > > There is still a need for the 32bit wine, as the wow64 build will ONLY > run 64bit windows apps, so for the majority of applications and games, > we'll still need the 32bit wine. Is that because wow64 is unstable in wine64? Wow64's reason for existence is to run 32-bit Windows binaries on 64-bit Windows/Wine and it works pretty well for most applications. __Martin From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 17:47:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AF9106566C for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:47:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from break19@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478148FC08 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:47:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iazz13 with SMTP id z13so2118434iaz.13 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:47:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xWCcbwAZvl7Bd3PVs+UZs0OU8134hJGrQ5Y0NdaBqcU=; b=k4IeDtqb9UabAjkkp//319Sc9c6TReP/e8Sx+TfZ7ZnK4i52Qy3cZiIC7h1aggrdCi e/NeLN2khEIO81SuqKGGCVxThUQsf91xWGFWPbZXrmne0lC1bdqUbDqUPtGPwgClDnEl QSp48s+Et1/fdrPELw3b71LL3oI3MCvN0dap4= Received: by 10.50.184.134 with SMTP id eu6mr8206056igc.17.1326304058954; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:47:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.4.45] (c-98-230-64-224.hsd1.al.comcast.net. [98.230.64.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q30sm7623761ibc.1.2012.01.11.09.47.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:47:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F0DCB3C.4060807@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:47:40 -0600 From: Chuck Burns User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120106 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <201201092017.19776.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> <4F0B2FC4.7090002@gmail.com> <201201101849.29845.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> <4F0CC7A4.4010707@gmail.com> <201201111624.q0BGOLlk030092@higson.cam.lispworks.com> In-Reply-To: <201201111624.q0BGOLlk030092@higson.cam.lispworks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.3.36 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:47:41 -0000 On 01/11/12 10:24, Martin Simmons wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:20:04 -0600, Chuck Burns said: >> >> On 01/10/12 10:49, David Naylor wrote: >>> I wasn't aware of WoW64 (and how it will make my packages redundent :->). I >>> see there are two wiki pages: >>> + http://wiki.winehq.org/Wine64 >>> + http://wiki.winehq.org/Wine64ForPackagers >>> >>> The latter makes this statement "Wine 64bit works at the moment only on >>> Linux." which would indicate that, at this stage, FreeBSD is precluded. That, >>> however, is just my speculation. >>> >>> To answer your question directly, I have put no thought or effort into wine64. >> >> There is still a need for the 32bit wine, as the wow64 build will ONLY >> run 64bit windows apps, so for the majority of applications and games, >> we'll still need the 32bit wine. > > Is that because wow64 is unstable in wine64? > > Wow64's reason for existence is to run 32-bit Windows binaries on 64-bit > Windows/Wine and it works pretty well for most applications. > > __Martin > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" wow64 doesnt -exist- in wine64 unless you compile the 32bit wine alongside it. You have to build it twice, to get two binaries "wine" and "wine64" and if you build them "properly" what happens when you attempt to execute a 64bit app with "wine" it's automatically relaunched with "wine64" But the reverse is NOT true. -- Chuck Burns The Southern Libertarian http://www.thesouthernlibertarian.com/ From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 14:38:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1221065673 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:38:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@lispworks.com) Received: from lwfs1-cam.cam.lispworks.com (mail.lispworks.com [193.34.186.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D258FC19 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from higson.cam.lispworks.com (higson [192.168.1.7]) by lwfs1-cam.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q0CEcPk9035530; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:38:25 GMT (envelope-from martin@lispworks.com) Received: from higson.cam.lispworks.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by higson.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.4) id q0CEcPeq028421; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:38:25 GMT Received: (from martin@localhost) by higson.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q0CEcPFV028417; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:38:25 GMT Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:38:25 GMT Message-Id: <201201121438.q0CEcPFV028417@higson.cam.lispworks.com> From: Martin Simmons To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <4F0DCB3C.4060807@gmail.com> (message from Chuck Burns on Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:47:40 -0600) References: <201201092017.19776.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> <4F0B2FC4.7090002@gmail.com> <201201101849.29845.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> <4F0CC7A4.4010707@gmail.com> <201201111624.q0BGOLlk030092@higson.cam.lispworks.com> <4F0DCB3C.4060807@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.3.36 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:38:29 -0000 >>>>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:47:40 -0600, Chuck Burns said: > > On 01/11/12 10:24, Martin Simmons wrote: > >>>>>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:20:04 -0600, Chuck Burns said: > >> > >> On 01/10/12 10:49, David Naylor wrote: > >>> I wasn't aware of WoW64 (and how it will make my packages redundent :->). I > >>> see there are two wiki pages: > >>> + http://wiki.winehq.org/Wine64 > >>> + http://wiki.winehq.org/Wine64ForPackagers > >>> > >>> The latter makes this statement "Wine 64bit works at the moment only on > >>> Linux." which would indicate that, at this stage, FreeBSD is precluded. That, > >>> however, is just my speculation. > >>> > >>> To answer your question directly, I have put no thought or effort into wine64. > >> > >> There is still a need for the 32bit wine, as the wow64 build will ONLY > >> run 64bit windows apps, so for the majority of applications and games, > >> we'll still need the 32bit wine. > > > > Is that because wow64 is unstable in wine64? > > > > Wow64's reason for existence is to run 32-bit Windows binaries on 64-bit > > Windows/Wine and it works pretty well for most applications. > > > > __Martin > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > wow64 doesnt -exist- in wine64 unless you compile the 32bit wine > alongside it. > > You have to build it twice, to get two binaries "wine" and "wine64" and > if you build them "properly" what happens when you attempt to execute a > 64bit app with "wine" it's automatically relaunched with "wine64" But > the reverse is NOT true. OK, that's what I would call unstable. Eventually though, I would expect a packaged wine64 to include wow64, just like Windows does. __Martin From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 02:24:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E91F106566C for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 02:24:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A50B8FC12 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 02:24:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2EF585C26 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:21:53 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F0F9174.9000208@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:05:40 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: libcups dependencies and linux apps printing X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 02:24:44 -0000 I have chased down the issue with printing with cups and linux apps, particularly acroread. Some of you may know how to do this already, but I've been debugging it myself for the past few hours- and googling my brains out. The port maintainer for linux-f10-libcups is this list, so here I am. The port requires dependencies on linux-f10-libgpg-error and linux-f10-gnutls (also maintained by the list). How do we adjust this? For that matter, the acroread port needs to depend on the libcups too. I'll have to contact the maintainer on that one. My interest in this is that the acroreader is needed in the graphics industry (almost a rule in Oz), and this would go a long way to helping out acceptance in that niche. And before you mention it Alex: I can take over the maintainership of both (if required), but I want to ensure my first works out ok beforehand. Cheers From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 21:45:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE1A1065676 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:45:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de [217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9378FC16 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:45:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p4FC42537.dip.t-dialin.net [79.196.37.55]) by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0498844017; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:45:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from unknown (IO.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.12]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C431D28; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:45:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:45:06 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Da Rock Message-ID: <20120113224506.0000765f@unknown> In-Reply-To: <4F0F9174.9000208@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4F0F9174.9000208@herveybayaustralia.com.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10cvs42 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: D0498844017.AF9B3 X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00) X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1327095911.66572@ZNWN/D5Qtc+EQduB7Aezpw X-EBL-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libcups dependencies and linux apps printing X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:45:24 -0000 On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:05:40 +1000 Da Rock wrote: > I have chased down the issue with printing with cups and linux apps, > particularly acroread. Some of you may know how to do this already, > but I've been debugging it myself for the past few hours- and > googling my brains out. > > The port maintainer for linux-f10-libcups is this list, so here I am. > The port requires dependencies on linux-f10-libgpg-error and > linux-f10-gnutls (also maintained by the list). How do we adjust this? I had a look with "objdump -x ..../libcups* | grep NEEDED" and I only see the dependency to gnutls. I committed this. For the libgpg-error dependency I suggest you search in the the involved binaries and libs with in a similar way than above for the source of the dependency to libgpg-error. > For that matter, the acroread port needs to depend on the libcups > too. I'll have to contact the maintainer on that one. > > My interest in this is that the acroreader is needed in the graphics > industry (almost a rule in Oz), and this would go a long way to > helping out acceptance in that niche. > > And before you mention it Alex: I can take over the maintainership of > both (if required), but I want to ensure my first works out ok > beforehand. For critical dependencies (ports which are depended upon by several ports) it is better when a group of people maintain them (more people are always welcome ;-) ). Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 23:29:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EE1106566C for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:29:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEFF8FC0A for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:29:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E02A5C26 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:41:33 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F10BD60.3040605@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:25:20 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <4F0F9174.9000208@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120113224506.0000765f@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20120113224506.0000765f@unknown> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: libcups dependencies and linux apps printing X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:29:03 -0000 On 01/14/12 07:45, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:05:40 +1000 Da Rock > wrote: > >> I have chased down the issue with printing with cups and linux apps, >> particularly acroread. Some of you may know how to do this already, >> but I've been debugging it myself for the past few hours- and >> googling my brains out. >> >> The port maintainer for linux-f10-libcups is this list, so here I am. >> The port requires dependencies on linux-f10-libgpg-error and >> linux-f10-gnutls (also maintained by the list). How do we adjust this? > I had a look with "objdump -x ..../libcups* | grep NEEDED" and I only > see the dependency to gnutls. I committed this. > > For the libgpg-error dependency I suggest you search in the the > involved binaries and libs with in a similar way than above for the > source of the dependency to libgpg-error. I based this on what worked for me, but I checked anyway. I will clarify that the dependency is between libgnutls on libgpg-error- it was clear in my mind anyway. I have a brain to mouth disfunction... or fingers :) objdump -x ...libgnutls.so.26: NEEDED libgpg-error.so.0 >> For that matter, the acroread port needs to depend on the libcups >> too. I'll have to contact the maintainer on that one. >> >> My interest in this is that the acroreader is needed in the graphics >> industry (almost a rule in Oz), and this would go a long way to >> helping out acceptance in that niche. >> >> And before you mention it Alex: I can take over the maintainership of >> both (if required), but I want to ensure my first works out ok >> beforehand. > For critical dependencies (ports which are depended upon by several > ports) it is better when a group of people maintain them (more people > are always welcome ;-) ). Cool. One less task on my list of things to do. I will help out though. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 09:51:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CD7106566C for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E995E8FC0A for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id q0E9pmdp076955 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 14 Jan 2012 01:51:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.14.2/Submit) with UUCP id q0E9pm2X076954; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 01:51:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA02642; Sat, 14 Jan 12 01:36:58 PST Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:36:34 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: Alexander@Leidinger.net Message-Id: <4f11af12.laG1ZsKm3Q69c5qZ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4F0F9174.9000208@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120113224506.0000765f@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20120113224506.0000765f@unknown> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au Subject: Re: libcups dependencies and linux apps printing X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:51:50 -0000 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > For critical dependencies (ports which are depended upon by > several ports) it is better when a group of people maintain > them (more people are always welcome ;-) ). and yet, having a port maintained by ports@ -- which is quite a large group -- tends _not_ to be considered a good thing :) From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 14:58:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19A8106566B for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:58:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DCB98FC12 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:58:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lahd3 with SMTP id d3so1127061lah.13 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 06:58:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=7M+4TvZvN6ZtBTpf0NNjBqemAm9w/8G3HSiBAvYkuNA=; b=myoF4mJDBOAJWTtrZFPQd1y3pov8sivb7CnCqon1q3r2PdhZAKiZU6ndO5dRydygmk QKXDUeGvFdVkQt4bMyWIVEfWM2+GvvHrdEOls/LHRFrSfPY0+DT7B3MDIM85sk1YQPXq 6tPRpRUMOHgqS69vPIV0y+jkCSgNEuurnDSfQ= Received: by 10.152.144.133 with SMTP id sm5mr2427785lab.38.1326551215305; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 06:26:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.18.227 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 06:26:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4f11af12.laG1ZsKm3Q69c5qZ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4F0F9174.9000208@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120113224506.0000765f@unknown> <4f11af12.laG1ZsKm3Q69c5qZ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> From: Eitan Adler Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:26:24 -0500 Message-ID: To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Alexander@leidinger.net, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au Subject: Re: libcups dependencies and linux apps printing X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:58:04 -0000 On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:36 AM, wrote: > Alexander Leidinger wrote: > >> For critical dependencies (ports which are depended upon by >> several ports) it is better when a group of people maintain >> them (more people are always welcome ;-) ). > > and yet, having a port maintained by ports@ -- which is quite > a large group -- tends _not_ to be considered a good thing :) A maintainer of "ports@freebsd.org" is an exception. It correctly means that there is NO maintainer, not that the entire mailing list maintains it. -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 22:38:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C6B1065675 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:38:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de [217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB42E8FC13 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:38:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p4FC42C30.dip.t-dialin.net [79.196.44.48]) by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 978B8844017; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 23:37:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from unknown (IO.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.12]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E075A1E2E; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 23:37:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 23:37:44 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Da Rock Message-ID: <20120114233744.0000690f@unknown> In-Reply-To: <4F10BD60.3040605@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4F0F9174.9000208@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120113224506.0000765f@unknown> <4F10BD60.3040605@herveybayaustralia.com.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10cvs42 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: 978B8844017.A14E5 X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-0.846, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, TW_BG 0.08, TW_BJ 0.08) X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1327185468.61584@7ADyX/ZigkLcmtOMfpW5yQ X-EBL-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libcups dependencies and linux apps printing X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:38:02 -0000 On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:25:20 +1000 Da Rock wrote: > On 01/14/12 07:45, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:05:40 +1000 Da Rock > > wrote: > > > >> I have chased down the issue with printing with cups and linux > >> apps, particularly acroread. Some of you may know how to do this > >> already, but I've been debugging it myself for the past few hours- > >> and googling my brains out. > >> > >> The port maintainer for linux-f10-libcups is this list, so here I > >> am. The port requires dependencies on linux-f10-libgpg-error and > >> linux-f10-gnutls (also maintained by the list). How do we adjust > >> this? > > I had a look with "objdump -x ..../libcups* | grep NEEDED" and I > > only see the dependency to gnutls. I committed this. > > > > For the libgpg-error dependency I suggest you search in the the > > involved binaries and libs with in a similar way than above for the > > source of the dependency to libgpg-error. > I based this on what worked for me, but I checked anyway. I will > clarify that the dependency is between libgnutls on libgpg-error- it > was clear in my mind anyway. I have a brain to mouth disfunction... > or fingers :) Could also be a misunderstanding on my side... if I look at my bad English above, I think I should have been in bed and sleep. > objdump -x ...libgnutls.so.26: NEEDED libgpg-error.so.0 Committed. Thanks. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 23:50:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41972106566C for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 23:50:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78DA8FC12 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 23:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 165B35C26; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 10:03:02 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F1213E8.50601@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 09:46:48 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <4F0F9174.9000208@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120113224506.0000765f@unknown> <4F10BD60.3040605@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120114233744.0000690f@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20120114233744.0000690f@unknown> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libcups dependencies and linux apps printing X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 23:50:32 -0000 On 01/15/12 08:37, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:25:20 +1000 Da Rock > wrote: > >> On 01/14/12 07:45, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >>> On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:05:40 +1000 Da Rock >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I have chased down the issue with printing with cups and linux >>>> apps, particularly acroread. Some of you may know how to do this >>>> already, but I've been debugging it myself for the past few hours- >>>> and googling my brains out. >>>> >>>> The port maintainer for linux-f10-libcups is this list, so here I >>>> am. The port requires dependencies on linux-f10-libgpg-error and >>>> linux-f10-gnutls (also maintained by the list). How do we adjust >>>> this? >>> I had a look with "objdump -x ..../libcups* | grep NEEDED" and I >>> only see the dependency to gnutls. I committed this. >>> >>> For the libgpg-error dependency I suggest you search in the the >>> involved binaries and libs with in a similar way than above for the >>> source of the dependency to libgpg-error. >> I based this on what worked for me, but I checked anyway. I will >> clarify that the dependency is between libgnutls on libgpg-error- it >> was clear in my mind anyway. I have a brain to mouth disfunction... >> or fingers :) > Could also be a misunderstanding on my side... if I look at my bad > English above, I think I should have been in bed and sleep. No, it was definitely a crossed wire in my brain... > >> objdump -x ...libgnutls.so.26: NEEDED libgpg-error.so.0 > Committed. Thanks. Thanks Alex.