From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 04:47:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6CD1065670 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 04:47:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-emulation@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09DE8FC1C for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 04:47:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 047F35C22 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:00:58 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F6EA35B.1050308@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:47:23 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <4F5D48E6.9010802@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F5F2CC5.80608@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F615D09.8030009@mittelstaedt.us> <4F617C63.9030106@mittelstaedt.us> <4F618F2B.7040709@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F642D63.10600@mittelstaedt.us> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Fwd: Kernel memory usage X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 04:47:27 -0000 On 03/18/12 00:49, Super Bisquit wrote: > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Ted Mittelstaedtwrote: > >> On 3/14/2012 11:41 PM, Da Rock wrote: >> >>> On 03/15/12 15:21, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >>> >>>> A number of FreeBSD kernel structures are dynamically created at >>>> boot time - based on the amount of ram in the system. I would guess >>>> if you boot your stripped BSD image on a virtual system with 64Mb of >>>> ram you wouldn't see the kernel grow to 32MB >>>> >>> So how do I find out how large the "kernel" is then in memory? >>> >> Boot it! From: >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_**US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/** >> configtuning-kernel-limits.**html >> >> "...The variable kern.maxusers is automatically sized at boot based on >> >> the amount of memory available in the system, and may be determined at >> >> run-time by inspecting the value of the read-only kern.maxusers sysctl..." >> >> A whole bunch of kernel parameters are calculated at boot based on this >> figure. Those make the kernel bigger or smaller. >> >> As to how "large" it is, the file descriptors, clusters and so on that >> are calculated at boot are considered part of the kernel from a memory >> standpoint. I'll take a closer look at that- I missed the significance. >> >> >> And how >> >>> did this conversation make it to emulation@? :) >>> >>> >> beats me. > > From working with qemu, asking questions, researching. This seemed to be a > better place for your situation. Ahh. I see now... Thanks for the info guys. 'I'll be back...' I'm sure :) > >> >> Actually, another question comes to mind: is it possible to limit how >>> large the kernel structures grow? >>> >> The handbook seems to imply that once they are all setup the kernel >> doesn't grow. >> >> >> >>>> It would be interesting to see FreeBSD running on a Smartphone. >>>> >>> Thats what I'm interested in for the long term, but not necessarily in >>> this instance. This really has become an interesting thread... for every >>> answer there are more questions- a hydra ;) >>> >> Heh. >> >> Ted >> >> >> >>>> Ted >>>> >>>> On 3/14/2012 9:03 PM, Super Bisquit wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 3/14/12, Ted Mittelstaedt> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> What do you regard as a "low memory" machine? >>>>>> >>>>> On real hardware I've used: >>>>> HTC Apache 64/128 ROM/RAM >>>>> Embedded 486 with 5M RAM >>>>> Older tower maxed at 128M >>>>> >>>>> I'd say anything less than 64M RAM for normal hardware, less than 32 >>>>> for embedded. >>>>> >>>>> Some systems do not have small memory modules. I have two SunBlade >>>>> 1000s that can be stripped down to 128M. >>>>> >>>>> I'm also aware that the environment limits what the machine can have >>>>> installed. >>>>> >>>>> There are older systems and embedded devices which run/ran on 16kb of >>>>> RAM. I'm certain that the oldest electronic led calculators used even >>>>> less memory. >>>>> I digress. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Ted >>>>>> >>>>>> On 3/13/2012 8:30 AM, Super Bisquit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>>>> From: Da Rock<9Phackers@**herveybayaustralia.com.au<9Phackers@herveybayaustralia.com.au> >>>>>>> Date: Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:17 AM >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Kernel memory usage >>>>>>> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 03/13/12 05:40, Super Bisquit wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> CPU architecture and model have a lot to do with performance. >>>>>>>> You will also get different results if you used qemu in place of >>>>>>>> VirtualBox. Qemu allows you to choose different emulated >>>>>>>> architectures, CPUs, and machine bases. What's the downside? You have >>>>>>>> to use the command line. >>>>>>>> Install qemu and run a series of virtual machines. >>>>>>>> Embedded devices also include Power(PC), ARMv?, Coldfire, et al; >>>>>>>> you're only dealing with i386 and/or the 64 bit extension (AMD64). >>>>>>>> CISC- which does not contain any hardware modification to be a RISC >>>>>>>> replacement- runs fewer instructions than RISC due to the limited >>>>>>>> number of registers. Take this into consideration every time a >>>>>>>> program runs. >>>>>>>> Everything else also matters on real and emulated systems: >>>>>>>> Is it ide, scsi, sdd, flashdevice for the hard drive? >>>>>>>> What type of RAM? >>>>>>>> Dedicated or shared disk? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm a little confused by the response, I was interested if someone >>>>>>> knew >>>>>>> what determines the size of kernel in memory (or wired); I only >>>>>>> considered >>>>>>> the embedded list because they have a greater interest in the >>>>>>> memory size >>>>>>> working with so little. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is academic as I'm trying to understand the kernel internals, as >>>>>>> well >>>>>>> as >>>>>>> understand what works with low memory so I can tune accordingly. I >>>>>>> understand the different CPU instruction sets (roughly), although I >>>>>>> would >>>>>>> be interested as to the size of the kernel in each. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What my question was about was the wired memory size and what makes it >>>>>>> grow >>>>>>> (to put it super simply :) ). I know some growth would be expected, >>>>>>> but >>>>>>> this seems obese; how would I find out how much memory a process >>>>>>> structure >>>>>>> takes? Or else what am I missing? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That said I'll have a crack at what you suggest as that follows a >>>>>>> whole >>>>>>> new >>>>>>> interesting tangent :) I have used qemu before, but found VBox a >>>>>>> bit more >>>>>>> responsive (and, I will admit, easier...) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 3/11/12, Da >>>>>>>> Rock<9Phackers@**herveybayaust**ralia.com.au >>>>>>>> <9Phackers@**herveybayaustralia.com.au<9Phackers@herveybayaustralia.com.au> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I may be required to move this to embedded, but I am only looking >>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>> generalisation. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Recently a thread came up on questions regarding memory usage, and a >>>>>>>>> post was made regarding wired memory being nearly all kernel- >>>>>>>>> something >>>>>>>>> I was ready to dispute, but then I thought I'd better make sure. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So I tested a few theories first off: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 1. Comparing memory usage across machines >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I checked servers and desktops as well as vm's for memory usage, >>>>>>>>> and I >>>>>>>>> found some interesting results. On a firewall with no apps installed >>>>>>>>> only 35M wired is used, on a desktop up to 700M~ can be used. >>>>>>>>> Even as a >>>>>>>>> dedicated server with a few services used it remains around 35M. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Surely this means that the wired memory used is not just kernel? >>>>>>>>> But I >>>>>>>>> held off my assumptions as it was still plausible that the >>>>>>>>> structures >>>>>>>>> used by the kernel could balloon that far, too. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2. Stripped down, lean mean, kernel machine >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I then (using a vm I was building a kernel for anyway) stripped >>>>>>>>> down a >>>>>>>>> kernel in a VBox VM using le drivers for network to see what >>>>>>>>> could be >>>>>>>>> achieved. This is my kernel conf: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> include GENERIC >>>>>>>>> ident VPN >>>>>>>>> options IPSEC >>>>>>>>> options IPSEC_DEBUG >>>>>>>>> options IPSEC_NAT_T >>>>>>>>> device crypto >>>>>>>>> device enc >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> # minimise kernel >>>>>>>>> nooptions UFS_GJOURNAL >>>>>>>>> nooptions MD_ROOT >>>>>>>>> nooptions NFSCL >>>>>>>>> nooptions NFSD >>>>>>>>> nooptions NFSLOCKD >>>>>>>>> nooptions NFS_ROOT >>>>>>>>> nooptions MSDOSFS >>>>>>>>> nooptions CD9660 >>>>>>>>> nooptions PROCFS >>>>>>>>> nooptions PSEUDOFS >>>>>>>>> nodevice fdc >>>>>>>>> nodevice mvs >>>>>>>>> nodevice siis >>>>>>>>> nodevice ahc >>>>>>>>> nodevice ahd >>>>>>>>> nodevice esp >>>>>>>>> nodevice hptiop >>>>>>>>> nodevice isp >>>>>>>>> nodevice mpt >>>>>>>>> nodevice mps >>>>>>>>> nodevice sym >>>>>>>>> nodevice trm >>>>>>>>> nodevice adv >>>>>>>>> nodevice adw >>>>>>>>> nodevice aic >>>>>>>>> nodevice bt >>>>>>>>> nodevice ses >>>>>>>>> nodevice amr >>>>>>>>> nodevice arcmsr >>>>>>>>> nodevice ciss >>>>>>>>> nodevice dpt >>>>>>>>> nodevice hptmv >>>>>>>>> nodevice hptrr >>>>>>>>> nodevice irr >>>>>>>>> nodevice ips >>>>>>>>> nodevice mly >>>>>>>>> nodevice twa >>>>>>>>> nodevice aac >>>>>>>>> nodevice aacp >>>>>>>>> nodevice ida >>>>>>>>> nodevice mfi >>>>>>>>> nodevice mlx >>>>>>>>> nodevice twe >>>>>>>>> nodevice tws >>>>>>>>> nodevice splash >>>>>>>>> nodevice cbb >>>>>>>>> nodevice pccard >>>>>>>>> nodevice cardbus >>>>>>>>> nodevice uart >>>>>>>>> nodevice ppc >>>>>>>>> nodevice ppbus >>>>>>>>> nodevice lpt >>>>>>>>> nodevice plip >>>>>>>>> nodevice ppi >>>>>>>>> nodevice puc >>>>>>>>> nodevice bxe >>>>>>>>> nodevice de >>>>>>>>> nodevice em >>>>>>>>> nodevice igb >>>>>>>>> nodevice ixgbe >>>>>>>>> nodevice ti >>>>>>>>> nodevice txp >>>>>>>>> nodevice vx >>>>>>>>> nodevice miibus >>>>>>>>> nodevice ae >>>>>>>>> nodevice age >>>>>>>>> nodevice alc >>>>>>>>> nodevice ale >>>>>>>>> nodevice bce >>>>>>>>> nodevice bfe >>>>>>>>> nodevice bge >>>>>>>>> nodevice dc >>>>>>>>> nodevice et >>>>>>>>> nodevice fxp >>>>>>>>> nodevice jme >>>>>>>>> nodevice lge >>>>>>>>> nodevice msk >>>>>>>>> nodevice nfe >>>>>>>>> nodevice nge >>>>>>>>> nodevice pcn >>>>>>>>> nodevice re >>>>>>>>> nodevice rl >>>>>>>>> nodevice sf >>>>>>>>> nodevice sge >>>>>>>>> nodevice sis >>>>>>>>> nodevice sk >>>>>>>>> nodevice ste >>>>>>>>> nodevice stge >>>>>>>>> nodevice tl >>>>>>>>> nodevice tx >>>>>>>>> nodevice vge >>>>>>>>> nodevice vr >>>>>>>>> nodevice wb >>>>>>>>> nodevice xl >>>>>>>>> nodevice cs >>>>>>>>> nodevice ed >>>>>>>>> nodevice ex >>>>>>>>> nodevice ep >>>>>>>>> nodevice fe >>>>>>>>> nodevice sn >>>>>>>>> nodevice xe >>>>>>>>> nodevice wlan >>>>>>>>> nooptions IEEE80211_DEBUG >>>>>>>>> nooptions IEEE80211_AMPDU_AGE >>>>>>>>> nooptions IEEE80211_SUPPORT_MESH >>>>>>>>> nodevice wlan_wep >>>>>>>>> nodevice wlan_ccmp >>>>>>>>> nodevice wlan_tkip >>>>>>>>> nodevice wlan_amrr >>>>>>>>> nodevice an >>>>>>>>> nodevice ath >>>>>>>>> nodevice ath_pci >>>>>>>>> nodevice ath_hal >>>>>>>>> nooptions AH_SUPPORT_AR5416 >>>>>>>>> nodevice ath_rate_sample >>>>>>>>> nodevice ipw >>>>>>>>> nodevice iwi >>>>>>>>> nodevice iwn >>>>>>>>> nodevice malo >>>>>>>>> nodevice mwl >>>>>>>>> nodevice ral >>>>>>>>> nodevice wi >>>>>>>>> nodevice wpi >>>>>>>>> nodevice md >>>>>>>>> nooption USB_DEBUG >>>>>>>>> nodevice uhci >>>>>>>>> nodevice ohci >>>>>>>>> nodevice ehci >>>>>>>>> nodevice xhci >>>>>>>>> nodevice usb >>>>>>>>> nodevice uhid >>>>>>>>> nodevice ukbd >>>>>>>>> nodevice ulpt >>>>>>>>> nodevice umass >>>>>>>>> nodevice ums >>>>>>>>> nodevice urio >>>>>>>>> nodevice u3g >>>>>>>>> nodevice uark >>>>>>>>> nodevice ubsa >>>>>>>>> nodevice uftdi >>>>>>>>> nodevice uipaq >>>>>>>>> nodevice uplcom >>>>>>>>> nodevice uslcom >>>>>>>>> nodevice uvisor >>>>>>>>> nodevice uvscom >>>>>>>>> nodevice aue >>>>>>>>> nodevice axe >>>>>>>>> nodevice cdce >>>>>>>>> nodevice cue >>>>>>>>> nodevice kue >>>>>>>>> nodevice rue >>>>>>>>> nodevice udav >>>>>>>>> nodevice rum >>>>>>>>> nodevice run >>>>>>>>> nodevice uath >>>>>>>>> nodevice upgt >>>>>>>>> nodevice ural >>>>>>>>> nodevice urtw >>>>>>>>> nodevice zyd >>>>>>>>> #nodevice firewire >>>>>>>>> nodevice fwe >>>>>>>>> nodevice fwip >>>>>>>>> #nodevice dcons >>>>>>>>> #nodevice dcons_rom >>>>>>>>> nodevice sound >>>>>>>>> nodevice snd_es137x >>>>>>>>> nodevice snd_hda >>>>>>>>> nodevice snd_ich >>>>>>>>> nodevice snd_uaudio >>>>>>>>> nodevice snd_via8233 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> World was also rebuilt as recommended by the handbook. As you can >>>>>>>>> see I >>>>>>>>> was rebuilding for IPSEC (for testing purposes only note). I >>>>>>>>> couldn't >>>>>>>>> remove dcons (not sure why- missing defined references), and that >>>>>>>>> pulled >>>>>>>>> in firewire too. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The result was surprising: a 14M kernel became 6.3M, and when >>>>>>>>> running I >>>>>>>>> found it only used 19M used for wired (whoopee!) as opposed to >>>>>>>>> 35M. No >>>>>>>>> services were running per se, only the usual suspects in base: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> vpn-test# ps ax >>>>>>>>> PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND >>>>>>>>> 0 ?? DLs 0:00.11 [kernel] >>>>>>>>> 1 ?? ILs 0:00.01 /sbin/init -- >>>>>>>>> 2 ?? DL 0:00.00 [crypto] >>>>>>>>> 3 ?? DL 0:00.00 [crypto returns] >>>>>>>>> 4 ?? DL 0:00.00 [sctp_iterator] >>>>>>>>> 5 ?? DL 0:00.00 [xpt_thrd] >>>>>>>>> 6 ?? DL 0:00.10 [pagedaemon] >>>>>>>>> 7 ?? DL 0:00.00 [vmdaemon] >>>>>>>>> 8 ?? DL 0:00.01 [pagezero] >>>>>>>>> 9 ?? DL 0:00.30 [bufdaemon] >>>>>>>>> 10 ?? DL 0:00.00 [audit] >>>>>>>>> 11 ?? RL 589:34.00 [idle] >>>>>>>>> 12 ?? WL 0:38.64 [intr] >>>>>>>>> 13 ?? DL 0:12.21 [geom] >>>>>>>>> 14 ?? DL 0:03.30 [yarrow] >>>>>>>>> 15 ?? DL 0:04.40 [syncer] >>>>>>>>> 16 ?? DL 0:00.63 [vnlru] >>>>>>>>> 17 ?? DL 0:00.53 [softdepflush] >>>>>>>>> 104 ?? Is 0:00.00 adjkerntz -i >>>>>>>>> 582 ?? Is 0:00.00 /sbin/devd >>>>>>>>> 737 ?? Ss 0:00.09 /usr/sbin/syslogd -s >>>>>>>>> 912 ?? Ss 0:02.68 /usr/sbin/ntpd -c /etc/ntp.conf -p >>>>>>>>> /var/run/ntpd.pid >>>>>>>>> 977 ?? Is 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/sshd >>>>>>>>> 984 ?? Ss 0:00.81 sendmail: accepting connections (sendmail) >>>>>>>>> 988 ?? Is 0:00.01 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for >>>>>>>>> /var/spool/client >>>>>>>>> 994 ?? Ss 0:00.12 /usr/sbin/cron -s >>>>>>>>> 2061 ?? Is 0:00.03 sshd: admin [priv] (sshd) >>>>>>>>> 2064 ?? S 0:00.04 sshd: admin@pts/0 (sshd) >>>>>>>>> 1052 v0 Is 0:00.01 login [pam] (login) >>>>>>>>> 1060 v0 I+ 0:00.02 -csh (csh) >>>>>>>>> 1053 v1 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv1 >>>>>>>>> 1054 v2 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv2 >>>>>>>>> 1055 v3 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv3 >>>>>>>>> 1056 v4 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv4 >>>>>>>>> 1057 v5 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv5 >>>>>>>>> 1058 v6 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv6 >>>>>>>>> 1059 v7 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv7 >>>>>>>>> 2065 0 Is 0:00.02 -csh (csh) >>>>>>>>> 2068 0 I 0:00.01 su >>>>>>>>> 2069 0 S 0:00.04 _su (csh) >>>>>>>>> 2414 0 R+ 0:00.00 ps ax >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> After some minutes though, the usage went up to 39M. WTF? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So I'm now thoroughly confused. Google didn't really show up any >>>>>>>>> real >>>>>>>>> answers either. Aside from discovering the true nature of what was >>>>>>>>> discussed in the posts, my hypothetical theorising is for my own >>>>>>>>> academics as well; and I'm trying to slim down my kernels to see >>>>>>>>> if I >>>>>>>>> can improve performance with low memory systems. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Can process structures cause this much ballooning? I find that >>>>>>>>> hard to >>>>>>>>> believe given not much is running here. My only other thought >>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>>> pipe or network structures? Anything I'm missing? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> FWIW, my trimmed down, slim and slender, aerodynamic kernel can >>>>>>>>> boot in >>>>>>>>> seconds as opposed to minutes. Sweet! Although compiling clang took >>>>>>>>> years... and gcc was built as well :/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>> ______________________________****_________________ >>>>>>>>> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>>>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/****mailman/listinfo/freebsd-****hackers >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@**** >>>>>>>>> freebsd.org >>>>>>>>>> " >>>>>>>>> ______________________________****_________________ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/****mailman/listinfo/freebsd-****hackers >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@**** >>>>>>>> freebsd.org >>>>>>>>> " >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> ______________________________****_________________ >>>>>>> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/****mailman/listinfo/freebsd-****hackers >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>>>> "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@**freebsd.org >>>>>>> " >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm fowarding this thread in the event the individual, "da Rock" >>>>>>> will be >>>>>>> able to receive more help. >>>>>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>>>>>> freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**emulation >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>>>> "freebsd-emulation-**unsubscribe@freebsd.org >>>>>>> " >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>> No virus found in this message. >>>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>>>>>> Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4871 - Release Date: >>>>>>> 03/14/12 >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> ----- >>>>> No virus found in this message. >>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>>>> Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4871 - Release Date: >>>>> 03/14/12 >>>>> >>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>>> freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**emulation >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-emulation-**unsubscribe@freebsd.org >>>> " >>>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**emulation >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-emulation-**unsubscribe@freebsd.org >>> " >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> No virus found in this message. >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>> Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4875 - Release Date: 03/16/12 >>> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**emulation >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-** >> unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 26 00:31:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D241065670; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:31:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slavs34@ef-law.com) Received: from host78.190-224-33.telecom.net.ar (host78.190-224-33.telecom.net.ar [190.224.33.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D348FC1E; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:31:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from apache by vbvdbaiedaha.wonderware.com with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <, , >) id 4ARAGK-6Z39CT-28 for , , ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 21:31:39 -0300 To: , , X-PHP-Script: vbvdbaiedaha.marston.com/sendmail.php for 190.224.33.78 From: , , X-Sender: , , X-Mailer: PHP X-Priority: 1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 21:31:39 -0300 Cc: Subject: Position opening in your area X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:31:40 -0000 I would like to take this time to welcome you to our hiring process and give you a brief synopsis of the position's benefits and requirements. If you are taking a career break, are on a maternity leave, recently retired or simply looking for some part-time job, this position is for you. Occupation: Flexible schedule 1 to 3 hours per day. We can guarantee a minimum 20 hrs/week occupation Salary: Starting salary is 3000 EUR per month plus commission. Region: Europe Please note that there are no startup fees or deposits to start working for us. To request an application form, schedule your interview and receive more information about this position please reply to Alexander@jobdayseu.com,with your personal identification number for this position IDNO: 1665 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 26 11:07:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D85A1065674 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:07:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E1D58FC23 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:07:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2QB720l018238 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:07:02 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2QB71FP018236 for freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:07:01 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:07:01 GMT Message-Id: <201203261107.q2QB71FP018236@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:07:02 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/159646 emulation [linux] [patch] bump Linux version in linuxulator f kern/156691 emulation [vmware] [panic] panic when using hard disks as RAW de o kern/156353 emulation [ibcs2] ibcs2 binaries that execute on 4.x not working o kern/155577 emulation [boot] BTX halted after install. Reboot during install o kern/155040 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux recvfrom doesn't handle proto fa o kern/153990 emulation [hyper-v]: Will not install into Hyper-V on Server 200 o kern/153887 emulation [linux] Linux emulator not understand STB_GNU_UNIQUE b o kern/153243 emulation [ibcs2] Seg fault whne running COFF binary using iBCS2 o kern/151714 emulation [linux] print/acroread9 not usable due to lack of supp a bin/150262 emulation [patch] truss(1) -f doesn't follow descendants of the a kern/150186 emulation [parallels] [panic] Parallels Desktop: CDROM disconnec o ports/148097 emulation [patch] suggested addition to linux_base-* packages to o ports/148096 emulation emulators/linux_base-* can not be built from ports on o kern/147793 emulation [vmware] [panic] cdrom handling, panic, possible race o kern/146237 emulation [linux] Linux binaries not reading directories mounted p kern/144584 emulation [linprocfs][patch] bogus values in linprocfs o ports/142837 emulation [patch] emulators/linux_base-* packages fails to insta o kern/140156 emulation [linux] cdparanoia fails to read drive data f kern/138944 emulation [parallels] [regression] Parallels no longer works in o kern/138880 emulation [linux] munmap segfaults after linux_mmap2 stresstest o ports/135337 emulation [PATCH] emulators/linux_base-f10: incorrect bash usage s kern/133144 emulation [linux] linuxulator 2.6 crashes with nvidias libGL.so. o kern/129169 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux Emulation ENOTCONN error using n o kern/126232 emulation [linux] Linux ioctl TCGETS (0x5401) always fails o kern/86619 emulation [linux] linux emulator interacts oddly with cp a kern/72920 emulation [linux] path "prefixing" is not done on unix domain so o kern/41543 emulation [patch] [request] easier wine/w23 support o kern/39201 emulation [linux] [patch] ptrace(2) and rfork(RFLINUXTHPN) confu o kern/36952 emulation [patch] [linux] ldd(1) command of linux does not work o kern/11165 emulation [ibcs2] IBCS2 doesn't work correctly with PID_MAX 9999 30 problems total. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 26 19:24:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6277D1065687; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:24:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from humanitarianismyfp4627@mthai.com) Received: from host238-42-dynamic.58-82-r.retail.telecomitalia.it (host238-42-dynamic.58-82-r.retail.telecomitalia.it [82.58.42.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC508FC1A; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:24:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 82.58.42.238(helo=freebsd.org) by freebsd.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MMZSD-6772kb-38 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:24:07 +0100 From: , To: , Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:24:07 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: siiz.76 Message-ID: <5156648461.9HEVDGMQ233319@jjudskpwrrarosg.mombp.com> Cc: Subject: Vacancy - apply online X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:24:08 -0000 I would like to take this time to welcome you to our hiring process and give you a brief synopsis of the position's benefits and requirements. If you are taking a career break, are on a maternity leave, recently retired or simply looking for some part-time job, this position is for you. Occupation: Flexible schedule 1 to 3 hours per day. We can guarantee a minimum 20 hrs/week occupation Salary: Starting salary is 3000 EUR per month plus commission. Region: Europe Please note that there are no startup fees or deposits to start working for us. To request an application form, schedule your interview and receive more information about this position please reply to Gustavo@jobdayseu.com,with your personal identification number for this position IDNO: 3082 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 21:44:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D25106566C for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:44:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158048FC0A for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:44:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.yuri.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2SLWoQD012847 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:32:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Message-ID: <4F738382.9090702@rawbw.com> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:32:50 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120218 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: emulation@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: virtualbox-4.1.10: Xorg CPU usage is 100% after Ubuntu guest is hanging idle for a while X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:44:34 -0000 I observed this few times after guest was totally idle for hours. Other X programs become very sluggish. Closing the guest lowers xorg CPU to <10%. 3D acceleration option is "off". It doesn't look like this happens every time, something triggers this. virtualbox-ose-4.1.10 NVidia driver, amd64 9.0 Yuri From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 09:40:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22AF106566B; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:40:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F648FC1C; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:40:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2T9eKpK068380; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:40:20 GMT (envelope-from edwin@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from edwin@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2T9eKPv068376; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:40:20 GMT (envelope-from edwin) Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:40:20 GMT Message-Id: <201203290940.q2T9eKPv068376@freefall.freebsd.org> To: edwin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, emulation@FreeBSD.org From: edwin@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/166485: www/linux-f10-flashplugin11 is vulnerable X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:40:20 -0000 Synopsis: www/linux-f10-flashplugin11 is vulnerable Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->emulation Responsible-Changed-By: edwin Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Mar 29 09:40:20 UTC 2012 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166485 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 17:27:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE58F106566C for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:27:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D158FC1B for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:27:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.yuri.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2THR546060775; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:27:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Message-ID: <4F749B69.5050103@rawbw.com> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:27:05 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120316 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <4F5D9666.5000209@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: <4F5D9666.5000209@rawbw.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Bernhard Froehlich Subject: Re: Screen of Ubuntu64 guest doesn't update when 3D acceleration option is "on" X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:27:08 -0000 On 03/11/2012 23:23, Yuri wrote: > Once I enabled 3D acceleration in "Display options", Ubuntu64 guest > screen stopped updating after guest window is covered by some other > host window. So that areas that became invisible are filled with > garbage until some window is closed or moved in guest and it repaints > the whole screen. > > This doesn't happen with Windows7 guest with 2D and 3D acceleration. > > vbox-4.1.8 on 9.0 amd64 host > > Update: I tried this with 32bit Ubuntu and it has the same issue with 3D option, and also same on vbox-4.1.10. I exported 32bit Ubuntu as an appliance and imported it into Mac OS 32bit, and Ubuntu guest doesn't even show panels there at all with 3D option. I filed the PR upstream: https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/10392 Yuri From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 19:19:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94DA106566B for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:19:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjuanino@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6818FC14 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:19:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so3061424bkc.13 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:19:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=L9Vv8UG61gxqwwea33gECWTa37og0B9YEwYCb05sfi4=; b=zkc3irznelIMGxF+8dSSbQN3ruzOx7ccrEsp0H0wafeD892M8ibxE+OHAi3CE36dCE q+RmwDoyOQlV85eC/Z72sJ+FMTZM8OGuh/zOvjmA0d6YoXGxrX2hWGO0DKoDbmNT/jS6 827SZcVnsx1HQBpxX5vXib4bscFWKkQfd158hOTFIb/USCKSEOtpsRdvGv2Z6c4IrYY/ AOFp122Yb8FiHnsVSwIyCu+IML/p+jHpz/HFbyQyvjkUoj+8HvMnI+25gltiC/ENdK2e dg8IRLfN09a1J/xN+X2i1MJwVVeuvB/+Vc6F8FiA7mbGXsZQqybkqsQKa8KmC0aaYo/1 cEsA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.132.145 with SMTP id hu17mr14788446bkc.66.1333048747731; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:19:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.81.70 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:19:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:19:07 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Garc=EDa_Juanino?= To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: sqlplus crashes receiving INT signal (only for 11.2.0 release database server) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:19:09 -0000 Hi, I am running FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE. My company has several Oracle Database servers. At this moment, we are using 11.2.0 on Sun Solaris. After start sqlplus oracle client and doing a CONTROL+C, client connection crashes: $ uname FreeBSD $ sqlplus /nolog SQL> connect user/password@database11_2_0 Connected. SQL> [Hit CONTROL+C to send INT signal to sqlplus] (At this point, sockstat -c4 -p 1521 shows a socket between my host and the oracle server) SQL> select 1 from dual; select 1 from dual * ERROR at line 1: ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel ERROR: ORA-03114: not connected to ORACLE (At this point, the previous socket has gone out) The ktrace - linux_kdump shows: "SQL> " 29849 sqlplus RET write 5 29849 sqlplus CALL linux_fstat64(0,0xbfbf8d3c,0x34ee4ff4) 29849 sqlplus UNKNOWN(8) 29849 sqlplus RET linux_fstat64 0 29849 sqlplus CALL linux_mmap2(0,0x1000,0x3,0x22,0xffffffff,0) 29849 sqlplus RET linux_mmap2 886091776/0x34d0b000 29849 sqlplus CALL read(0,0x34d0b000,0x1000) 29849 sqlplus RET read RESTART 29849 sqlplus PSIG SIGINT caught handler=3D0x347fec2c mask=3D0x0 code=3D= 0x0 29849 sqlplus CALL linux_rt_sigprocmask(0,0xbfbf8bec,0,0x8) 29849 sqlplus RET linux_rt_sigprocmask 0 29849 sqlplus CALL linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x1,0xbfbf8bec,0,0x8) 29849 sqlplus RET linux_rt_sigprocmask 0 29849 sqlplus CALL linux_rt_sigreturn(0xbfbf8d50) 29849 sqlplus RET linux_rt_sigreturn JUSTRETURN 29849 sqlplus CALL read(0,0x34d0b000,0x1000) 29849 sqlplus GIO fd 0 read 1 byte " " 29849 sqlplus RET read 1 29849 sqlplus CALL write(0x1,0x34d0a000,0x1) 29849 sqlplus GIO fd 1 wrote 1 byte " " 29849 sqlplus RET write 1 29849 sqlplus CALL write(0x1,0x34d0a000,0x5) 29849 sqlplus GIO fd 1 wrote 5 bytes "SQL> " 29849 sqlplus RET write 5 29849 sqlplus CALL read(0,0x34d0b000,0x1000) 29849 sqlplus GIO fd 0 read 26 bytes "select 1 from dual; " 29849 sqlplus RET read 26/0x1a 29849 sqlplus CALL gettimeofday(0xbfbfae44,0) 29849 sqlplus RET gettimeofday 0 29849 sqlplus CALL linux_socketcall(0x9,0xbfbf5b00) 29849 sqlplus GIO fd 4 wrote 1 byte "!" 29849 sqlplus RET linux_socketcall 1 29849 sqlplus CALL write(0x4,0xbfbf5d00,0xb) 29849 sqlplus GIO fd 4 wrote 11 bytes "\0\v\0\0\f\0\0\0\^A\0\^B" 29849 sqlplus RET write 11/0xb 29849 sqlplus CALL read(0x4,0x80caf7e,0x810) 29849 sqlplus GIO fd 4 read 10 bytes "\0 \0\0\^F\0\0\0\0@" 29849 sqlplus RET read 10/0xa 29849 sqlplus CALL linux_socketcall(0xe,0xbfbf64b4) 29849 sqlplus RET linux_socketcall 0 29849 sqlplus CALL linux_socketcall(0xe,0xbfbf64b4) 29849 sqlplus RET linux_socketcall 0 29849 sqlplus CALL close(0x4) 29849 sqlplus RET close 0 29849 sqlplus CALL close(0x3) 29849 sqlplus RET close 0 29849 sqlplus CALL linux_fcntl64(0x80bdcb0,0x2,0x1) 29849 sqlplus RET linux_fcntl64 -1 errno 9 Bad file descriptor 29849 sqlplus CALL write(0x1,0x34d0a000,0x19) 29849 sqlplus GIO fd 1 wrote 25 bytes "select 1 from dual " 29849 sqlplus RET write 25/0x19 29849 sqlplus CALL write(0x1,0x34d0a000,0x2) 29849 sqlplus GIO fd 1 wrote 2 bytes "* " 29849 sqlplus RET write 2 29849 sqlplus CALL write(0x1,0x34d0a000,0x11) 29849 sqlplus GIO fd 1 wrote 17 bytes "ERROR at line 1: " 29849 sqlplus RET write 17/0x11 29849 sqlplus CALL write(0x1,0x34d0a000,0x30) 29849 sqlplus CALL write(0x1,0x34d0a000,0x30) 29849 sqlplus GIO fd 1 wrote 48 bytes "ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel The same issue happens with oracle linux instantclient 10.2.0.5 and 11.2.0.3, but it does *not* arise when oracle database server version is 10.2.0. Here you can see a similar ktrace-linux_kdump, but with a Oracle Database Server version =3D 10.2.0: "SQL> " 30272 sqlplus RET write 5 30272 sqlplus CALL linux_fstat64(0,0xbfbf8d3c,0x34ee4ff4) 30272 sqlplus UNKNOWN(8) 30272 sqlplus RET linux_fstat64 0 30272 sqlplus CALL linux_mmap2(0,0x1000,0x3,0x22,0xffffffff,0) 30272 sqlplus RET linux_mmap2 886091776/0x34d0b000 30272 sqlplus CALL read(0,0x34d0b000,0x1000) 30272 sqlplus RET read RESTART 30272 sqlplus PSIG SIGINT caught handler=3D0x347fec2c mask=3D0x0 code=3D= 0x0 30272 sqlplus CALL linux_rt_sigprocmask(0,0xbfbf8bec,0,0x8) 30272 sqlplus RET linux_rt_sigprocmask 0 30272 sqlplus CALL linux_rt_sigprocmask(0x1,0xbfbf8bec,0,0x8) 30272 sqlplus RET linux_rt_sigprocmask 0 30272 sqlplus CALL linux_rt_sigreturn(0xbfbf8d50) 30272 sqlplus RET linux_rt_sigreturn JUSTRETURN 30272 sqlplus CALL read(0,0x34d0b000,0x1000) 30272 sqlplus GIO fd 0 read 1 byte " " 30272 sqlplus RET read 1 30272 sqlplus CALL write(0x1,0x34d0a000,0x1) 30272 sqlplus GIO fd 1 wrote 1 byte " " 30272 sqlplus RET write 1 30272 sqlplus CALL write(0x1,0x34d0a000,0x5) 30272 sqlplus GIO fd 1 wrote 5 bytes "SQL> " 30272 sqlplus RET write 5 30272 sqlplus CALL read(0,0x34d0b000,0x1000) 30272 sqlplus GIO fd 0 read 20 bytes "select 1 from dual; " 30272 sqlplus RET read 20/0x14 30272 sqlplus CALL gettimeofday(0xbfbfae44,0) 30272 sqlplus RET gettimeofday 0 30272 sqlplus CALL linux_socketcall(0x9,0xbfbf5b00) 30272 sqlplus GIO fd 4 wrote 1 byte "!" 30289 sqlplus RET linux_socketcall 1 30289 sqlplus CALL write(0x4,0xbfbf5d00,0xb) 30289 sqlplus GIO fd 4 wrote 11 bytes "\0\v\0\0\f\0\0\0\^A\0\^B" 30289 sqlplus RET write 11/0xb 30289 sqlplus CALL read(0x4,0x80ca796,0x810) 30289 sqlplus GIO fd 4 read 11 bytes "\0\v\0\0\f\0\0\0\^A\0\^B" 30289 sqlplus RET read 11/0xb 30289 sqlplus CALL read(0x4,0x80c83e6,0x810) 30289 sqlplus GIO fd 4 read 101 bytes "\0e\0\0\^F\0\0\0\0\0\^D\^A\^A\^A\^X\^A\^A\^B\^C=F5\0\0\^A\^C\0/\0\0= \0\0\ \0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\^Z\0\^A\^A\0\0\0\0006ORA-01013: user requested can= cel\ of current operation " 30289 sqlplus RET read 101/0x65 30289 sqlplus CALL write(0x4,0x80c8c06,0x55) 30289 sqlplus GIO fd 4 wrote 85 bytes "\0U\0\0\^F\0\0\0\0\0\^Qi\^[\^A\^A\^B\^A\^A\^A\^C\^C^\^\\^B\M^@a\0\^= A\ \^A\^R\^A\^A\r\0\^A\0\^A\^A\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\^A\^A\0\0\0\^A\^Rselect 1= fr\ om dual\^A\^A\0\0\0\0\0\0\^A\^A\0\0\0\0\0" 30289 sqlplus RET write 85/0x55 30289 sqlplus CALL read(0x4,0x80ca796,0x810) 30289 sqlplus GIO fd 4 read 147 bytes "\0\M^S\0\0\^F\0\0\0\0\0\^P\^W}M=C9=B4#=F0=BC=FBQ\^Br=ED=AA=E0\M^V= =C8xp\^C\^]\^V\^B\^C\^A\ \^B\^A\^AM\^B\0\0\0\^A\^B\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\^A\^A\^A\^A\^A1\0\0\0\^A\a\= axp\ \^C\^]\^V\^R\^B\^A\^A\^B\^_=E8\^A\^B\^A\^B\^F\^B\^A\^A\0\^A\^A\0\0\= 0\a\ \^B=C1\^B\b\^A\^F\^D=D9E\^V"\^A\^B\^A\^A\0\0\0\0\0\0\^D\^A\^A\^A\^Z= \^A\^A\ \0\0\0\^A\^A\0\^C\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\^\\0\^A\^A\0\0\0\0" 30289 sqlplus RET read 147/0x93 30289 sqlplus CALL write(0x4,0x80c8c06,0x11) 30289 sqlplus GIO fd 4 wrote 17 bytes "\0\^Q\0\0\^F\0\0\0\0\0\^C\^E\^]\^A\^A\^A\^O" 30289 sqlplus RET write 17/0x11 30289 sqlplus CALL read(0x4,0x80c83e6,0x810) 30289 sqlplus GIO fd 4 read 72 bytes "\0H\0\0\^F\0\0\0\0\0\^D\^A\^A\^A\^[\^A\^A\^B\^E{\0\0\^A\^A\0\^C\0\0= \0\ \0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\^]\0\^A\^A\0\0\0\0\^YORA-01403: no data found " 30289 sqlplus RET read 72/0x48 30289 sqlplus CALL write(0x1,0x34d0a000,0x1) 30289 sqlplus GIO fd 1 wrote 1 byte " " 30289 sqlplus RET write 1 30289 sqlplus CALL write(0x1,0x34d0a000,0x4) 30289 sqlplus GIO fd 1 wrote 4 bytes " 1 " 30289 sqlplus RET write 4 30289 sqlplus CALL write(0x1,0x34d0a000,0xb) 30289 sqlplus GIO fd 1 wrote 11 bytes Any advice will be appreciated, and sorry for my poor english. Please keep me in Cc: as I am not subscribed to the list. Best regards From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 08:14:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744BE106564A; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:14:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from decke@FreeBSD.org) Received: from groupware.itac.at (groupware.itac.at [91.205.172.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15F98FC15; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.bluelife.at (93.104.210.95) by groupware.itac.at (Axigen) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 2EE796; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:13:58 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:13:57 +0200 From: Bernhard Froehlich To: Mikolaj Golub In-Reply-To: <867gyg77h0.fsf@kopusha.home.net> References: <867gyg77h0.fsf@kopusha.home.net> Message-ID: <12f5de744d0ca920d3b204aa291b4084@bluelife.at> X-Sender: decke@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.7.2 X-AxigenSpam-Level: 1 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0205.4F756B46.000F,ss=1,pt=R_264747,fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [patch] VirtualBox-4.0.14 + FreeBSD/CURRENT + VIMAGE: crash on vm shutdown X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:14:05 -0000 On 19.03.2012 20:48, Mikolaj Golub wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a patch that fixes the issue I have been observing recently: > running > on VIMAGE enabled kernel VirtualBox causes the kernel crash when vm > is powered > off: > > ng_unref_node(8b156880,0,1,101,0,...) at ng_unref_node+0x74 > ng_snd_item(8d060d40,0,8b0e18f0,0,0,...) at ng_snd_item+0x2a5 > ng_send_fn(8b156880,0,8b0e18f0,0,0,...) at ng_send_fn+0x35 > ng_rmnode_self(8b156880,89f840e0,8b0dbcc0,deec88cc,8b0d9ffa,...) at > ng_rmnode_self+0x4a > > vboxNetFltOsDeleteInstance(89f84010,89f84014,89f84010,deec88ec,8b0da0f4,...) > at vboxNetFltOsDeleteInstance+0x63 > vboxNetFltRelease(89f84010,0,0,0,89f84014,...) at > vboxNetFltRelease+0x6a > > vboxNetFltPortDisconnectAndRelease(89f84014,2710,87748bd4,87748bd4,deec8930,...) > at vboxNetFltPortDisconnectAndRelease+0x64 > _end(8b15ed10,89f84210,877456b0,0,deec8990,...) at 0x8cffe057 > SUPR0ObjRelease(8b15ed10,89f4b810,deec89c8,deec89a0,0,...) at > SUPR0ObjRelease+0x133 > _end(8b15eb90,898a0e10,877456b0,0,89f4b810,...) at 0x8cffe4bb > > supdrvCleanupSession(8162bac0,89f4b810,89f4b810,deec89f4,8160e52f,...) > at supdrvCleanupSession+0xef > supdrvCloseSession(8162bac0,89f4b810,8ceecb18,deec8a18,8ceecaa0,...) > at supdrvCloseSession+0x19 > VBoxDrvFreeBSDClose(89ee6c00,3,2000,8adcc5c0,8adcc5c0,...) at > VBoxDrvFreeBSDClose+0x2f > devfs_close(deec8a78,8ceecaa0,80400,80f8caac,133,...) at > devfs_close+0x2ca > VOP_CLOSE_APV(81095960,deec8a78,80f8caac,133,2,...) at > VOP_CLOSE_APV+0xda > vn_close(8ceecaa0,3,8b24b380,8adcc5c0,80f792e0,...) at vn_close+0x190 > vn_closefile(89f8cd58,8adcc5c0,0,89f8cd58,0,...) at vn_closefile+0xe4 > devfs_close_f(89f8cd58,8adcc5c0,0,0,89f8cd58,...) at > devfs_close_f+0x35 > > _fdrop(89f8cd58,8adcc5c0,0,deec8b80,0,8adcc670,81273398,810a7620,89e50c2c,79d,80f7401d,deec8b90,80a2f81e,89e50c2c,8,80f7401d,79d,0,89f8cd58) > at _fdrop+0x43 > closef(89f8cd58,8adcc5c0,79d,79a,8adcc670,...) at closef+0x2b0 > fdfree(8adcc5c0,0,80f74dc6,107,deec8c18,...) at fdfree+0x3ea > exit1(8adcc5c0,0,deec8d1c,80db7aee,8adcc5c0,...) at exit1+0x57a > sys_sys_exit(8adcc5c0,deec8cec,80fd0bf8,80f53607,8adbf5c0,...) at > sys_sys_exit+0x1d > syscall(deec8d28) at syscall+0x2de > Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x21 Sorry for the late response and thanks for the patch. Is this patch still required for 4.1.8? My guess is yes but it would be great if you could confirm that with the latest port. Do you aggree that this patch is under MIT License so that I can push it upstream? -- Bernhard Froehlich http://www.bluelife.at/ From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 31 18:13:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA7C106564A for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:13:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE388FC0A for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:13:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.yuri.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2VIDHEU073767 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:13:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Message-ID: <4F77493C.2090600@rawbw.com> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:13:16 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120316 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: emulation@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: VirtualBox-4.1.10: Mouse gets trapped in the FreeBSD-9.0 guest with additions installed X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:13:23 -0000 I had 9.0 amd64 guest installed under the older VirtualBox. Now host was upgraded to 4.1.10, but additions in FreeBSD 9.0 guest were still 4.1.2 and it worked fine. Once I upgraded additions to 4.1.10, now mouse began getting trapped in the guest window, like there were no additions at all. Otherwise, guest still works fine, ex. window resize works. Yuri From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 31 19:08:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58176106564A for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:08:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89C28FC0A for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:08:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhj6 with SMTP id hj6so1223142wib.13 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:08:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=I8wU/RpAR47quZdhgDh73+cRoXCrjKIQDAPPsKJvJ30=; b=LGPbWkD2K22n6HzbGDSbYSTiCQHig99dlDG1An7Q6Lfr3WOzZ+AZi2+mtmNmo+BGvY QaifRR1vEHSSEuB8iUgyHlDSHC91pKmd7P3Y/WBArFxbx+eoJc1qAXoVoilZb3V1xAW8 h2hk5eKai85f2E9+AXrz9oIuQK3ngvZju0T0m1OcUHCOLXEZc48Rphd/+VQORd+z26vT Zui5WXJPbBhW/ndrsWSp8G6FGCXw/0pNV2sT7XbfIfq6JZb+WuELuG6PbE89jv9wDvoo CUNlBOvtOLp9LAGOBqPqDFKH2LrQKf5A7u+BjCkMEPvFUxt7fF5uHXfPLkegbci2eIT8 DwCQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.85.69 with SMTP id f5mr8556602wiz.18.1333220928819; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.54.207 with HTTP; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:08:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F77493C.2090600@rawbw.com> References: <4F77493C.2090600@rawbw.com> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:08:48 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: Yuri Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VirtualBox-4.1.10: Mouse gets trapped in the FreeBSD-9.0 guest with additions installed X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:08:50 -0000 On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Yuri wrote: > I had 9.0 amd64 guest installed under the older VirtualBox. Now host was > upgraded to 4.1.10, but additions in FreeBSD 9.0 guest were still 4.1.2 and > it worked fine. > Once I upgraded additions to 4.1.10, now mouse began getting trapped in the > guest window, like there were no additions at all. Otherwise, guest still > works fine, ex. window resize works. > > Yuri > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I assume that you tried to release the pointer? I have seen some strange behavior with 4.1.10 involving both mouse and keyboard, but not FreeBSD related. I see them on my Ubuntu guest on my Windows 7 host, too. Particularly I've had odd issues with mouse clicks on the host system after starting the VM and I, too, have had the pointer trapped on occasion, but not consistently. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 31 19:27:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B759106564A for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:27:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0879C8FC1B for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.yuri.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2VJRIUL088654; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:27:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Message-ID: <4F775A96.2090103@rawbw.com> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:27:18 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120316 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Oberman References: <4F77493C.2090600@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VirtualBox-4.1.10: Mouse gets trapped in the FreeBSD-9.0 guest with additions installed X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:27:20 -0000 On 03/31/2012 12:08, Kevin Oberman wrote: > I assume that you tried to release the pointer? Yes, releases it. And I see this consistently now with FreeBSD 9.0 guest, but not with Ubuntu or Windows 7 guests. All on the same amd64 FreeBSD 9.0 host. Yuri From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 31 21:41:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F27F1065673 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:41:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD7F8FC20 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:41:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhr17 with SMTP id hr17so1527912wib.1 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:41:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=tkJcsNT8rm1DV5Sl2WNfa/5jSmleUZ4olgoqCOviZGE=; b=jU2rhXi8uN+j3gcIyvJpY5P610y+GhuiDhOdpUzEZkIU4D5jPVoy5fqas2pm4nOyCr kXUi67i/g0EpkmmGpUycbU+ninR5RhNEr1b5DuQFLPZdduHDM5ScMZjBqD6XX/vM7oh1 qQBoYuRcOmXPRTldCGMQHS5b5MA7GjllPI7doXI4fK+S/UJdMVFXMaUd8813YQAQdqVp wPFtmOtPzS/fE4xJWl5hT6+/+3UDByocayBdi/z3Wndw5u4KX2Yu7VOD6juvVJwcUJKJ sg6tzAR5FjFIoQ4HiSsDYkJhHP4YNGQ+thRLTFcxozmS2tzD/FMxsxS53BD8c0+ks+ne beBw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.24.35 with SMTP id r3mr10172445wif.7.1333230112289; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:41:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.94.73 with HTTP; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:41:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F775A96.2090103@rawbw.com> References: <4F77493C.2090600@rawbw.com> <4F775A96.2090103@rawbw.com> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:41:52 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Yuri Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VirtualBox-4.1.10: Mouse gets trapped in the FreeBSD-9.0 guest with additions installed X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:41:59 -0000 On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Yuri wrote: > Yes, releases it. > And I see this consistently now with FreeBSD 9.0 guest, but not with > Ubuntu or Windows 7 guests. > All on the same amd64 FreeBSD 9.0 host. VBox creates a log for each VM instance, and it generally logs info about this kind of stuff. Did you try restarting the VM to insure all nessecary services have been restarted? -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 31 22:57:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C082D1065670 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 22:57:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5128FC24 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 22:57:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wern13 with SMTP id n13so1332811wer.13 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:57:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WRSEN3rufFbmu92hqxjqTCx16ThdxRMZVxljN4dWf+E=; b=BKD9mUy+WWJE1WBONK1hjH3Fs0Mc0iC64pWdSYQ8vfeIJFbvypbuUMdbe2VUARwXqW 17gWwTk3N/13SdIrljvddONpto41oZmY5LPt2SgOHXuqrFleERTp43y6ADlEIkmuFXl1 yGwEo1Y96SXnIxcWg4S0qrBesb2L/nZJKr2Ae7KwcFRbkiqV8LGp1T14/m3qCXuLslGP t/NP0klAwjD0w185rzSRPH3+Ikr+sErhJi0H2JD0izQAvaUW1sV9numZ5DbsNVG8+a4C pl5Msy+eIX8BomvT/20gFvPADvV6tm0be5C4KNfEN+a6ED9j51gTuZgA3IQrVYLmeory ARrw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.96.168 with SMTP id dt8mr9818991wib.18.1333234665023; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:57:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.54.207 with HTTP; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:57:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4F77493C.2090600@rawbw.com> <4F775A96.2090103@rawbw.com> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:57:44 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: Adam Vande More Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VirtualBox-4.1.10: Mouse gets trapped in the FreeBSD-9.0 guest with additions installed X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 22:57:46 -0000 On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Adam Vande More wr= ote: > On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Yuri wrote: >> >> Yes, =A0releases it. >> And I see this consistently now with FreeBSD 9.0 guest, but not with >> Ubuntu or Windows 7 guests. >> All on the same amd64 FreeBSD 9.0 host. > > > VBox creates a log for each VM instance, and it generally logs info about > this kind of stuff.=A0 Did you try restarting the VM to insure all nessec= ary > services have been restarted? I confirm the same behavior on my FreeBSD guest on a Window 7 server. I installed the latest guest services and confirmed their set-up in rc.conf as well as my account being in the wheel group. Where would I look for this log? On the host or the guest and in what locat= ion? --=20 R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com