Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:13:32 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Alex Kozlov <spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua> Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, mi@aldan.algebra.com, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: X11BASE still in use in ports Message-ID: <4FE7910C.6070807@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120624123714.GA83824@ravenloft.kiev.ua> References: <4FE6F010.80609@FreeBSD.org> <20120624123714.GA83824@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/24/2012 05:37, Alex Kozlov wrote: > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 03:46:40AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> I noticed a failure in one of my ports today while doing an upgrade, and >> was embarrassed to find that it was due to my port still using X11BASE. >> That led me to do a quick grep of the tree, which seems to indicate that >> there are a non-zero number of uses of it which seem to be erroneous: >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/x11base-ports.txt >> >> Note, some of these are actually Ok, I haven't made an attempt to filter >> them out yet. >> >> Is there any interest in cleaning these up? Should we restore the >> definition of X11BASE until all of the ports that are using it are fixed? >> >> I'm kind of surprised by this problem, since the usual way of removing >> something like this is to make sure all of the consumers have been fixed >> first. > I have done a basic analysis. Ports that need to be fixed ('?' - not sure, > '<D>' - should be deleted): http://people.freebsd.org/~ak/x11base.log Thanks Alex! I fixed the obvious ones. Of the ports@ ones, ports/games/ezquake needs a look, since it probably needs more than just a quick edit. I added emulation@ so that they can look at the linux-base ports on your list. It wasn't clear to me how/if those should be changed. And ports/math/wingz3 needs a look too, I'm not sure what _X11BASE_ is about there. hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FE7910C.6070807>