From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 24 01:45:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD431065673; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 01:45:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC30156F61; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 01:45:54 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FE67152.8080008@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:45:54 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120621 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eitan Adler References: <4FE2315C.50706@FreeBSD.org> <4FE2F673.2080201@FreeBSD.org> <4FE518FB.1000802@FreeBSD.org> <4FE566CB.406@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: irc/xchat: limit icon blinking time X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 01:45:54 -0000 On 06/23/2012 14:18, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 22 June 2012 23:48, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 06/22/2012 20:14, Eitan Adler wrote: >>> I don't oppose build patches for FreeBSD when the program otherwise >>> works, but the ports collection is not a software development >>> repository. >> >> There are a non-trivial number of examples to the contrary. > > Such as? Several of my ports, to start with. Which is why I'm concerned at your attempt to change policy by fiat. >> Not to >> mention that there is actually no reason for us not to have our own >> stuff in ports. > > Our own stuff is completely unrelated. The question at hand is do we > continue development of third party software by means of patches to > the ports tree? And the answer has always been, "Yes." I have no idea where you got any other idea. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection