From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 19 02:29:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2567E1065672 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 02:29:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@rewt.org.uk) Received: from mx.as41113.net (abby.lhr1.as41113.net [91.208.177.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B8E8FC13 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 02:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.11.44] (unknown [91.208.177.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lists@rewt.org.uk) by smtp.as41113.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8655C2280F; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 02:29:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F405E96.9020804@rewt.org.uk> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 02:29:42 +0000 From: Joe Holden User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Raymond Wagner References: <4F3F4810.6070501@rewt.org.uk> <4F3F6D95.1000605@wagnerrp.com> <4F3FD501.4060307@rewt.org.uk> <4F3FF6F2.90002@wagnerrp.com> In-Reply-To: <4F3FF6F2.90002@wagnerrp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic after vnet/jail destroy X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 02:29:51 -0000 On 18/02/2012 19:07, Raymond Wagner wrote: > On 2/18/2012 11:42, Joe Holden wrote: >> On 18/02/2012 09:21, Raymond Wagner wrote: >>> On 2/18/2012 01:41, Joe Holden wrote: >>>> jail_relay_exec_poststop0="ifconfig bridge0 deletem epair0a" >>>> jail_relay_exec_poststop1="ifconfig epair0a destroy" >>>> jail_relay_exec_poststop2="ifconfig bridge1 deletem epair1a" >>>> jail_relay_exec_poststop3="ifconfig epair1a destroy" >>> >>> The kernel panics when you try to destroy an epair. This is a known >>> issue, and not a new issue. I've see the same problem at least as far >>> back as 8.1. The current work around is to simply not destroy them >>> when you bring down your jails. Of course this does mean you will >>> build up a collection of unused epairs. >> Hm really? I haven't seen it when not using the jailv2 stuff, is there a >> pr for this? > > I don't know off hand if there are any open tickets related to this, > but a quick search came up with... > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/2011-January/000628.html > aha, thanks! J