From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 10 23:59:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772E2106566C; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14DCE8FC0A; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so5788383iah.13 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 15:59:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Hm6LeMO7x7yt0TQbK7jvNQk84RqVPp13BEpRULfSag0=; b=Nk0XCpIPrAVBczrUkKKX2p3R8LSRZcM3/I9/3uuQReZSUlPuhOMb/gbWyOr0UvtVsX 5Tez2JPSCL+ZgheyeTAbAoO8WMp89m+UJNmMGE69LUtlAFe/ONXi7J7j/9Bz7FkPFPi0 A+Zp7rq8TuO+TyQJXt7LZsQxeS3zxPgwvj+aFi65fAAV6Ml58JWEQznc7Ic4WxRRC4ng EkqpH4UZlu2iWpRFXXH4dntrKE4ARHnmlnrGU2SWtA/pZyWR2X+iRU2+XozPyIRkxO+j OyNcxcxhwh4XJUFVf/s3y8jWz7KoLu1alxYzOJ/iRKQQGkg3Cu0Yq/Lp0eY8MH8rHK6b WLCQ== Received: by 10.50.181.228 with SMTP id dz4mr11894547igc.9.1331423974585; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 15:59:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.53.67 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 15:59:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4F55E619.3080305@FreeBSD.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:59:04 +0000 Message-ID: To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: kuriyama@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports , pgsql@freebsd.org Subject: Re: databases/pglessog, databases/pg_rman problems after the last bsd.database.mk update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:59:35 -0000 On 6 March 2012 20:57, Chris Rees wrote: > On 6 March 2012 20:50, Chris Rees wrote: >> On 6 March 2012 10:25, Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> I noticed this when building indexes. =A0Seems that databases/pglesslog >>> and databases/pg_rman are unhappy as a consequence of the last >>> bsd.database.mk update, but only if postgresql (other than version 8.3) >>> is already installed: >>> >>> Initially -- with postgresql-client-9.0.7_1 installed: >>> >>> databases/pglesslog:# make -V PGSQL_VER >>> >>> databases/pglesslog:# make -V BUILD_DEPENDS >>> /nonexistent:/usr/ports/databases/postgresql-server:build >>> gmake:/usr/ports/devel/gmake >>> >>> >>> PGSQL_VER ends up empty, causing the BUILD_DEPENDS to refer to a >>> non-existent 'postgresql-server' port. >>> >>> Simply deleting the postgresql client ... >>> >>> databases/pglesslog:# pkg delete -x postgresql >>> The following packages will be deinstalled: >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0postgresql-client-9.0.7_1 >>> >>> The deinstallation will save 8 MB >>> >>> Proceed with deinstalling packages [y/N]: y >>> Deinstalling postgresql-client-9.0.7_1... done >>> >>> >>> ... fixes the INDEX: >>> >>> databases/pglesslog:# make -V PGSQL_VER >>> 83 >>> databases/pglesslog:# make -V BUILD_DEPENDS >>> /nonexistent:/usr/ports/databases/postgresql83-server:build >>> gmake:/usr/ports/devel/gmake >>> >>> Since this is dependent on postgresql !8.3 already being installed I >>> guess it wouldn't have shown up in testing. =A0It seems that these are = the >>> only two ports affected. >> >> Yes-- these ports will have IGNORE set for them, so the INDEX entry >> will be bogus anyway. > > I meant to add-- now the preferred way to depend on the server is to use: > > USE_PGSQL=3D server > > (also still depends on -client, but then so does -server) > > I'll work on getting server:extract to work-- looks popular. I've just committed a fix that solves your INDEX problem for now [1], but I'll still get kuriyama@ to use the new server:extract when it comes in. Chris [1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Mk/bsd.database.mk.diff?r1= =3D1.68;r2=3D1.69 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 07:29:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217D81065672; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 07:29:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EADA8FC16; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 07:29:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2B7ThSE002817 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Mar 2012 07:29:50 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q2B7ThSE002817 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q2B7ThSE002817; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none Message-ID: <4F5C545D.90202@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 07:29:33 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4F55E619.3080305@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD5CF0DE2301C8C30CB20A3BA" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: kuriyama@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports , pgsql@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: databases/pglessog, databases/pg_rman problems after the last bsd.database.mk update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 07:29:55 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD5CF0DE2301C8C30CB20A3BA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/03/2012 23:59, Chris Rees wrote: > I've just committed a fix that solves your INDEX problem for now [1], > but I'll still get kuriyama@ to use the new server:extract when it > comes in. >=20 > Chris >=20 > [1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Mk/bsd.database.mk.diff= ?r1=3D1.68;r2=3D1.69 Great -- that seems to work fine, and the resulting index line looks reasonable: lucid-nonsense:/usr/ports:% grep ^pglesslog INDEX-9 pglesslog-1.2|/usr/ports/databases/pglesslog|/usr/local|Reduce size of PostgreSQL archive log files by replacing backup blocks|/usr/ports/databases/pglesslog/pkg-descr|kuriyama@FreeBSD.org|data= bases|gettext-0.18.1.1 gmake-3.82 libiconv-1.13.1_2 libxml2-2.7.8_2 openssl-1.0.0_9 pkg-config-0.25_1 postgresql-client-9.1.3 postgresql-server-9.1.3|gettext-0.18.1.1 libiconv-1.13.1_2 libxml2-2.7.8_2 openssl-1.0.0_9 pkg-config-0.25_1 postgresql-client-9.1.3|http://pglesslog.projects.postgresql.org/||| Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enigD5CF0DE2301C8C30CB20A3BA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9cVGYACgkQ8Mjk52CukIy0owCfaoHG/LZt84LXf+0+FXcFqsWb 76UAnjeCLI7rcoOZuGRtFp/giU+FB274 =ycpa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD5CF0DE2301C8C30CB20A3BA-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 08:13:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A508106566B for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:13:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kron24@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF4E8FC15 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:13:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wern13 with SMTP id n13so552108wer.13 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 00:13:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xDD257o3XUu3HiK2vCKFe/zwmRaBydP3XPJggG4N1cI=; b=z2F/4Q3iGU2vzQvasR2gfyM0uO1lT6iqHS9GmRgDdtHHT2QR30bR+JpkSsFX3utz+Q +3EaB7bfiGMLZvNEmP3TwiK1D4TZUGosQ9BCzw9Z0JjBnfX2OTWLigE/dWWOx1aeB5Tu tTa7WzoYPn6z6seri9TDU3iX2H7u72QNY7KL7bf5TaodbnAOiRqgb731g6xEn5mkdZ/1 U6iVMw21utm3ZSJOu8VJt5BZbnsxV/s/7uQ+N+MbEtI7tCb2H7wt9yvZGM9xee80PZcE JwVcjmFrYhJ1pU7Zm/lm8qRFj9BYC38La+DbgpXrzX0QKYa20rEio3zk8reiK/aZh6pW +3pA== Received: by 10.180.86.105 with SMTP id o9mr17999357wiz.4.1331453624070; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 00:13:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from nbvk.local (uidzr185150.sattnet.cz. [212.96.185.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h19sm21869769wiw.9.2012.03.11.00.13.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 11 Mar 2012 00:13:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F5C5EB3.40408@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:13:39 +0100 From: kron User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120218 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr, fidaj@ukr.net References: <4F46110C.6060508@gmail.com> <20120223152625.35396f19@nonamehost.> <20120223135253.GD20841@Alien.Universe> <20120306195609.GF5143@Alien.Universe> In-Reply-To: <20120306195609.GF5143@Alien.Universe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: conky does not build X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:13:45 -0000 On 2012/03/06 20:56, Nikos Ntarmos wrote: > FYI patch attached and also submitted as follow-up to ports/164893[1]. > > Cheers. > > \n\n Excuse me coming late, I was away and couldn't test. Everything is OK now. Many thanks to Nikos and Ivan. BR, Oli From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 08:51:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7543106564A; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kuriyama.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FAE8FC18; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:51:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcmm1 with SMTP id m1so3756476vcm.13 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 00:51:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wQJ26ef7h4AHeqeGSzrkA8OJbZ6NgA42EEtSGgO0m9Y=; b=sFRLaKL7TpO0BVGHbjq9xgtRTb05uMBzjQe4fZqOojYvLu3h2NlxtEhkpYGNL57IBL qWdUDGJQ0Nh9TuGcC55tIvVYO7w9FoI7JuLdt6pLCUQmqQqpo+9GOPUNnStLFPrQKw5R yhNRwf9Hg0ZnqTBX4//k63erWVt6bw6ug/OUUGLugQxyq+ztmYVdWYZASFOCzBvDUBqH FyG5pFkHO5U0tWRis6Gv69QfnDiWFeEMtD6TDgpIzhaZhZ++IMtbhNHH4cby41azN1z5 tgnuySuvc0xbxrHws3IthsbBcFEuTMCz9k1LYxwoTrZ0nQdpLGwmXLKBTW7D+S8TKnUR oc2Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.64.234 with SMTP id r10mr11914345vds.39.1331455881843; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 00:51:21 -0800 (PST) Sender: kuriyama.bsd@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.99.166 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 00:51:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4F55E619.3080305@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:51:21 +0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Cd7QnDKD8iezwMGoN7_LWU-0hec Message-ID: From: Jun Kuriyama To: Chris Rees Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Matthew Seaman , pgsql@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports Subject: Re: databases/pglessog, databases/pg_rman problems after the last bsd.database.mk update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:51:23 -0000 > I've just committed a fix that solves your INDEX problem for now [1], > but I'll still get kuriyama@ to use the new server:extract when it > comes in. I don't have INDEX generate testing environment for now, so can you commit a fix? --=20 Jun Kuriyama // FreeBSD Project =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0 // S2 Factory, Inc. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 09:06:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C54E106571A; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:06:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458D38FC12; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so2725889bkc.13 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 01:06:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=U2ELcH8+q0lJETjZEKhS6I1g4nic3MCqWiqr6A/v3Ik=; b=atqOnpMvgT53C/4n22rDz0NSt7eYNlNFjCwD8mPDq7UsHYy0S7SL5jNHoPmFeFsimg cCTb0wYvdaWrCEqdB82Mzb64VDEP9hBbPeeN8C+K9ehiCz8FoeyixvqT5EJXi/sxD6dJ XyKjqavt49wwFIQO1CHg53EFnHt4VNbmHCI1xmjxbgzviFpcDrDDGdrQTRZV9eI0uFun e4ZQv06iGwRx14JzEKTR9NdwyfHo2Kis7TyRkES4Ob5TlwaJ3VAnvOsP45RbADDLWrrj vgjUC9RuCCIAVqnTOCxykzeqyEcCHOWA8hQ1rGsToAHv/hIXdBfI/DdFo++v4lr2PAuT 9AqQ== Received: by 10.204.148.82 with SMTP id o18mr3354236bkv.108.1331456765159; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 01:06:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 01:05:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4F55E619.3080305@FreeBSD.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:05:35 +0000 Message-ID: To: Jun Kuriyama Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Matthew Seaman , pgsql@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports Subject: Re: databases/pglessog, databases/pg_rman problems after the last bsd.database.mk update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:06:07 -0000 On 11 March 2012 08:51, Jun Kuriyama wrote: >> I've just committed a fix that solves your INDEX problem for now [1], >> but I'll still get kuriyama@ to use the new server:extract when it >> comes in. > > I don't have INDEX generate testing environment for now, so can you > commit a fix? Sure, thanks. Didn't realise you were CC'd in! I'll make sure I test it properly. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 09:34:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0FB1065672 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:34:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from barbara.xxx1975@libero.it) Received: from outrelay01.libero.it (outrelay01.libero.it [212.52.84.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003128FC17 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:34:16 +0000 (UTC) X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0203.4F5C7197.0187,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-libjamoibt: 1821 Received: from wmail22 (172.31.0.74) by outrelay01.libero.it (8.5.140) id 4F59E874002D563C for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:34:15 +0100 Message-ID: <3233376.2357761331458455846.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:34:15 +0100 (CET) From: Barbara To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SenderIP: 80.182.115.135 X-libjamv: KDLWMql4Rxg= X-libjamsun: yAWX0pGW7Q1fyx2N0SDutaV2UZMnBjXJZfKIbCNvkEo= Subject: portsnap not fetching X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Barbara List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:34:17 -0000 Portsnap isn't fetching new ports since yesterday. If I'm not wrong the last fetched is devel/xxdgb. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 12:11:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6491065670 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herby@mailbox.sk) Received: from smtp-in1.antik.sk (smtp-in1.antik.sk [88.212.10.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FE58FC0C for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-in1.antik.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F0A176F22 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:05:39 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at smtp-in1.antik.sk Received: from smtp-in1.antik.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-in1.antik.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k66HjGvNZAEY for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:05:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailserver.antik.sk (mailserver.antik.sk [88.212.10.6]) by smtp-in1.antik.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B457176F21 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:05:37 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 642 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2012 13:05:37 +0100 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 637, pid: 638, t: 0.0245s scanners: regex: 1.4.0 attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.96.5/m:46/d:7367 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.94?) (10.56.102.50) by mailserver.antik.sk with SMTP; 11 Mar 2012 13:05:37 +0100 Message-ID: <4F5C950F.2020203@mailbox.sk> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:05:35 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?SGVyYnkgVm9qxI3DrWs=?= User-Agent: Postbox Express 1.0.1 (Windows/20100705) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: portsnap problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:11:34 -0000 Hello, for a day already, portsnap fetch seems not to fetch newest changes. freshports shows lots of changes, port portsnap fetch says there everything is up to date. I checked that the ports are really newer in freshports than in my machine. I also removed everything in /usr/ports and /var/db/portsnap and issued portsnap fetch extract, but it did not help. Maybe some job that creates patches for portsnap died? Herby From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 12:38:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA80D1065672 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:38:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720538FC12 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:38:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so6794643iah.13 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 05:38:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=QSMkJFt0jI6BuXcZ61hOdaEmA+INotVidxjMK2ZmcUQ=; b=m1gXEuZwVADLEjWS6SHDD6r1XQOJIxtREkSShJogb+Vpis61+FehcqlCa1z2qBzhcT NmJj6/oChcNEdDMztlfSIX1RBAOopgjhJwuwfeP4nCgCXNBbGrflDhIbJ+LFvqEj3zpu FgBcIMUcy/P987pe7tV/lfD8Tg25TpPRxEGvnrw0As4Fi+O498yzcIJF3BClWYswAnkb /qlueMCE3yJmldlr8T2EW3xFx8SvsC98Lq1fSmd0b6qI/6lf3pDE6LZcMLh5eN56RwdS 572mq3DqCnfLynE49bMLRv1aYXmVtIiRCXFhmTnNxuvCyzDj7/iQn8SheHxLj0yhnnYh 7lGg== Received: by 10.50.154.200 with SMTP id vq8mr13852221igb.14.1331469491984; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 05:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from luna.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com. [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id df2sm15449984igb.0.2012.03.11.05.38.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 11 Mar 2012 05:38:11 -0700 (PDT) From: ajtiM To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 07:38:02 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-RELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; i386; ; ) References: <4F5C950F.2020203@mailbox.sk> In-Reply-To: <4F5C950F.2020203@mailbox.sk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201203110738.02969.lumiwa@gmail.com> Subject: Re: portsnap problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:38:12 -0000 On Sunday 11 March 2012 07:05:35 Herby Voj=C4=8D=C3=ADk wrote: > Hello, >=20 > for a day already, portsnap fetch seems not to fetch newest changes. > freshports shows lots of changes, port portsnap fetch says there > everything is up to date. > I checked that the ports are really newer in freshports than in my machin= e. > I also removed everything in /usr/ports and /var/db/portsnap and issued > portsnap fetch extract, but it did not help. >=20 > Maybe some job that creates patches for portsnap died? >=20 > Herby > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I have the same "problem" on my 9.0-Release. Mitja =2D------- http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 12:55:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BE8106566B for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:55:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi.sergio@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D9C48FC12 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:55:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnk4 with SMTP id k4so2162332ggn.13 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 05:55:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references :disposition-notification-to:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer; bh=GMxPhux5rECyiaMjlM4wsrF+yWHO9RFLaSG3wO7slfI=; b=aAdKqZU8EVaPtK8mIEeYeozqjoK4O/IxJQd6kUJjlzzirX6/aACWxN94ozPbycvFuK 7DjCjUq/rjqsK66lkmNO7yhGRqlILKkwpqv8AOkL+1x5CQSTE7I2iUSNIwS7ZZvaaPkq IxxiRTSoMab5zPqm6K3SvtiZhyBuySgrbu2EUVow2JskfqNlgVyJAwhVUo2EGnAGsT8D tV5UPRpCFfU8LqRpCNZ+I6JCTs8KbVXD5/yJX9JRsSMddJdsaXDXl2gee44LpCCIbZWd 3hcG9k5x6SOYo1qpiR/46i2/olGJ5FqZxOrQ6pG/vphAUT/dU5erwcyEljZDzp60GVEI x/xQ== Received: by 10.236.134.211 with SMTP id s59mr9739671yhi.131.1331470532401; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 05:55:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.6.230] ([189.32.4.71]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h30sm30447758yhk.4.2012.03.11.05.55.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 11 Mar 2012 05:55:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi To: ajtiM In-Reply-To: <201203110738.02969.lumiwa@gmail.com> References: <4F5C950F.2020203@mailbox.sk> <201203110738.02969.lumiwa@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:55:27 -0300 Message-ID: <1331470527.25467.4.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:55:33 -0000 Em Dom, 2012-03-11 às 07:38 -0500, ajtiM escreveu: > On Sunday 11 March 2012 07:05:35 Herby Vojčík wrote: > > Hello, > > > > for a day already, portsnap fetch seems not to fetch newest changes. > > freshports shows lots of changes, port portsnap fetch says there > > everything is up to date. > > I checked that the ports are really newer in freshports than in my machine. > > I also removed everything in /usr/ports and /var/db/portsnap and issued > > portsnap fetch extract, but it did not help. > > > > Maybe some job that creates patches for portsnap died? > > Or just that ports system is "frozen" because of the 8.3 release??? Occam's razor: when you have two or more competing theories that make exactly the same predictions, the simpler one is the better. [] Sergio From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 13:00:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0879106566C for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:00:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679658FC08 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:00:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhj6 with SMTP id hj6so1943038wib.13 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 05:59:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sqeSEQXnL+ZSBFjKlGGJ+8B3VcPpwuYpf39SYiBPdKk=; b=Kd5AsCuVV4zonvjhjPyZ8XlrN0AC2KZ3OnDXw0+Na479SGd+O0vAGFvx2lyNWVdsUw AqQvZdx8TFvhVKnVFzWT8rIgCG1sr5YJkgkRZQN7OEp6tMUrpfrKAc4SMZibwAAFguRB aE5+rfDBZ5A/WhQ26Xxms3+W4AmbBbXS6hHIFyhKOX9lRbXf65mKKm7r7nCd7gj7agly 6gfL4rESPAon0fkJuZZdK0wkrKNQHy1xIGm/+acFRqlfmay6CFB+X2bcWA+ihYeP7bDY 2jQlKycytwW2NUIuCKI/A1sqnjUCegpzzsASch4W+PjdOh0Px2FDNMh9qsg4DqjXj86g 7G2A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.19.196 with SMTP id h4mr15565494wie.12.1331470799296; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 05:59:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.106.234 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 05:59:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1331470527.25467.4.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> References: <4F5C950F.2020203@mailbox.sk> <201203110738.02969.lumiwa@gmail.com> <1331470527.25467.4.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:59:59 +0100 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?= To: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ajtiM , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:00:01 -0000 http://www.rene-ladan.nl/ GPG fingerprint =3D E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0=C2=A0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net) 2012/3/11 Sergio de Almeida Lenzi : > Em Dom, 2012-03-11 =C3=A0s 07:38 -0500, ajtiM escreveu: > >> On Sunday 11 March 2012 07:05:35 Herby Voj=C4=8D=C3=ADk wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > for a day already, portsnap fetch seems not to fetch newest changes. >> > freshports shows lots of changes, port portsnap fetch says there >> > everything is up to date. >> > I checked that the ports are really newer in freshports than in my mac= hine. >> > I also removed everything in /usr/ports and /var/db/portsnap and issue= d >> > portsnap fetch extract, but it did not help. >> > >> > Maybe some job that creates patches for portsnap died? >> > > > Or just that ports system is "frozen" because of the 8.3 release??? > No, Herby's theory is far more likely. The ports system is open as ususal, except that no big changes can go in and all commits have to be tagged with the "Feature safe" tag (and actually be feature safe). Ren=C3=A9 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 13:01:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343E51065687; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:01:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293DD8FC0A; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:01:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so2809185bkc.13 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 06:01:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/GL+SLAPzeaYGyOCEdZY1tHREYurDqV1H6bA2Cf3wYA=; b=dpupj4mERxMXLp3XRhQ6Vb1TQ4zJL0FccA9Jvrj8EDcsJbnHk6dS9foFXFmhzX62IV MiN8V02Q/kF8HCuxzwbW3wqY6Wmn4WazX7JcAIzNuR2L4S72IK/sAGF0IEj27v8NBzg0 IuOioBh8CuCVQ5KVfULMpvzgs2Zn035KHSXWMFlQj6vG839YofqOmm+MRj3MHIoUixEL 4TEnDlDghfczqTDEbR/DJiCS2a9EzEW3oE6YJ8iKO1Py9ao2ESKfRWVaNXyilC8wSl3G q0STfNHCLywhvp0TX4SVmoLMMjethdwpD3D5+AINq2fg1egKYaSx+Lp+2qfJRDvUj2vu CN3Q== Received: by 10.204.156.201 with SMTP id y9mr846586bkw.90.1331470867152; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 06:01:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 06:00:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1331470527.25467.4.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> References: <4F5C950F.2020203@mailbox.sk> <201203110738.02969.lumiwa@gmail.com> <1331470527.25467.4.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:00:37 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: KfITkX5IDot2gjpWAW1hD3NJFN0 Message-ID: To: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ajtiM , Colin Percival , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: portsnap problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:01:09 -0000 On 11 March 2012 12:55, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wr= ote: > Em Dom, 2012-03-11 =C3=A0s 07:38 -0500, ajtiM escreveu: > >> On Sunday 11 March 2012 07:05:35 Herby Voj=C4=8D=C3=ADk wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > for a day already, portsnap fetch seems not to fetch newest changes. >> > freshports shows lots of changes, port portsnap fetch says there >> > everything is up to date. >> > I checked that the ports are really newer in freshports than in my mac= hine. >> > I also removed everything in /usr/ports and /var/db/portsnap and issue= d >> > portsnap fetch extract, but it did not help. >> > >> > Maybe some job that creates patches for portsnap died? >> > > > Or just that ports system is "frozen" because of the 8.3 release??? > > Occam's razor: > > when you have two or more competing theories > that make exactly the same predictions, > the simpler one is the better. CC: portsnap maintainer Although that might be a reasonable explanation, it's much more likely that portsnap data is not being generated right now. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 13:07:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD98C1065670 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:07:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBA18FC08 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2BD7QHS008311 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:07:26 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q2BD7QHS008311 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q2BD7QHS008311; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none Message-ID: <4F5CA387.9070008@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:07:19 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <4F5C950F.2020203@mailbox.sk> <201203110738.02969.lumiwa@gmail.com> <1331470527.25467.4.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> In-Reply-To: <1331470527.25467.4.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig77FBD71010B463E4F36209FC" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Subject: Re: portsnap problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:07:31 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig77FBD71010B463E4F36209FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/03/2012 12:55, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: > Em Dom, 2012-03-11 =C3=A0s 07:38 -0500, ajtiM escreveu: >=20 >> On Sunday 11 March 2012 07:05:35 Herby Voj=C4=8D=C3=ADk wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> for a day already, portsnap fetch seems not to fetch newest changes. >>> freshports shows lots of changes, port portsnap fetch says there >>> everything is up to date. >>> I checked that the ports are really newer in freshports than in my ma= chine. >>> I also removed everything in /usr/ports and /var/db/portsnap and issu= ed >>> portsnap fetch extract, but it did not help. >>> >>> Maybe some job that creates patches for portsnap died? >>> >=20 > Or just that ports system is "frozen" because of the 8.3 release??? >=20 > Occam's razor: >=20 > when you have two or more competing theories=20 > that make exactly the same predictions, > the simpler one is the better. That's not it. Ports only gets frozen completely for a matter of an hour or so as part of the release process. Instead, it spends much of the period leading up to a release in "Slush" -- which is the case at the moment. Slush doesn't mean that ports stop being updated. On the contrary, there have been some twenty-odd ports updated just this morning as I can see from the cvs-ports@ mailing list. Slush does mean that changes with large scale ramifications are not permitted, so last week's perl-related updates for instance, would not be allowed right now. The portsnap thing is a real problem. No idea what or why or how long to fix, but I'd hazard a guess that the answer to the last is "by later today." Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig77FBD71010B463E4F36209FC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9co40ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyN9ACfU3BJvLVBmgwuNc1D/XL7yGq5 sSgAnR/2752GpD0rMOd+TZryYqE4xC2L =b7f7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig77FBD71010B463E4F36209FC-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 13:08:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99FCB106572E for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:08:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces+73574-4ea6-freebsd-ports=freebsd.org@sendgrid.me) Received: from o5.shared.sendgrid.net (o5.shared.sendgrid.net [74.63.236.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D4AD8FC12 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:08:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sendgrid.info; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpapi; bh=0bRrey6hGi2PXUOK9bcN0bgiUCo=; b=HPoL99EWLYaL7pYlQx20PZphjr9U qlKKlaOyQAr3HVJzKE0sXGEFD7BwyrdQDh9TxJAldNQkTeTTAJOgy5vdU4DT2rzw bX0WJKKx8T67qWXhiDp7bcfLPECf492NJxndSaYmujm8nJjSK7dCUdOtFTPTSEyI G4YSlKSlRLZU2d4= Received: by 10.41.149.108 with SMTP id f04-05.12891.4F5CA38D2 Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:07:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.tarsnap.com (unknown [10.41.149.212]) by i04-02 (SG) with ESMTP id 4f5ca3f1.3f51.55e2729 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19786 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2012 13:04:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clamshell.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.tarsnap.com with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2012 13:04:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 77452 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2012 13:07:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clamshell.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1) by clamshell.daemonology.net with SMTP; 11 Mar 2012 13:07:38 -0000 Message-ID: <4F5CA39A.7000401@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 06:07:38 -0700 From: Colin Percival User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120218 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4F5C950F.2020203@mailbox.sk> <201203110738.02969.lumiwa@gmail.com> <1331470527.25467.4.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sendgrid-EID: Vb+Anvs0EfIvXbjCHlZrgTi2P99w3zdT2hDloNa5MO4cwTOhqRyDcaP5aIGFvm+bYxWqoiXYplVKvjuPHoopIX0JTHWxcy5YESiLOjmt1SXFci6IcJ0VDABvyhLbwfugqP2J+uz0RiSNfz2B6Z6cA/8XpRKfrieY3XmMu986fck= Cc: ajtiM , Sergio de Almeida Lenzi , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: portsnap problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:08:08 -0000 On 03/11/12 06:00, Chris Rees wrote: > CC: portsnap maintainer Thanks! I don't regularly read freebsd-ports (funny for the portsnap maintainer to not be subscribed, I know, but I get way too much email already...). > Although that might be a reasonable explanation, it's much more likely > that portsnap data is not being generated right now. Almost correct -- I just restarted the portsnap builds a few minutes ago. They were broken for about 18 hours; I'm not entirely certain of the cause but I suspect a freebsd.org DNS glitch was at least partly responsible. -- Colin Percival Security Officer, FreeBSD | freebsd.org | The power to serve Founder / author, Tarsnap | tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 13:22:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B73106566C for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:22:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E6B8FC0C for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:22:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghrr20 with SMTP id r20so2160065ghr.13 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 06:22:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=GdJ4R3yKym1IW+thWPszzB6wT2a+FpvH43VKC4j/qqU=; b=iZz6GIJfkUCNdHwOscTc+cqpMknW8pzrmrcaCPf3pSGIGWf7mDWh6dp4r+XXp4GTxV jM5EqzllTVP8874WYi9PnwbD1tSQDYIssfIhXYMVc6IuCjYstKa7RwRRtmwbAsyxtLSi K+G11Ydm6JTvY58vCwsfeTDmcFad1LV5jgyTwG5cs95JU37M/oLcnWVMnOugjtqqpxvJ Y710NtXI4zVa7C5BU4SEwiEOcWybNdbjJIkc3r0n5nSZDjBJTMzQpnk5z3V+2jYUmbjk C7nA+A7VyXwRRlnPPFEUPXS5OcHxIflJiTA9oTLaAUFF+EigdiHy75/WV5bUiOPsQP0N GLaw== Received: by 10.236.116.195 with SMTP id g43mr9819351yhh.26.1331472136255; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 06:22:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q5sm18682655anm.21.2012.03.11.06.22.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 11 Mar 2012 06:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3V5NKK5VjXz2CG4t for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:22:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:22:13 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120311092213.55f4663b@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <1331470527.25467.4.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> References: <4F5C950F.2020203@mailbox.sk> <201203110738.02969.lumiwa@gmail.com> <1331470527.25467.4.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmicHAFv/7cE1JHbj/PQbLV43vUcZ8lZ8jPpLhVBpItrEnPgpUuan3ABfV7YtYsFNV55Eqv Subject: Re: portsnap problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:22:17 -0000 On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:55:27 -0300 Sergio de Almeida Lenzi articulated: > Or just that ports system is "frozen" because of the 8.3 release??? > > Occam's razor: > > when you have two or more competing theories > that make exactly the same predictions, > the simpler one is the better. Actually, there are numerous "razors", Occam's being only one. Occam's razor (also written as Ockham's razor) is the English equivalent of the Latin lex parsimoniae --- the law of parsimony, economy or succinctness. It is a principle urging one to select among competing hypotheses that which makes the fewest assumptions and thereby offers the simplest explanation of the effect. It is usually translated as, "simpler explanations are, other things being equal, generally better than more complex ones". The key phase being "other things being equal". Personally, I am a strong believer in "Murphy's Law". -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 13:36:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FA8106564A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:36:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi.sergio@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C654B8FC0C for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl9 with SMTP id l9so2165173yen.13 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 06:36:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:disposition-notification-to :content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=E9piGsAEJzM4TQsz1HSGW+ygSL6XC6V9jSRj1Ih3K5w=; b=vVm/9hVBnu/NOFKwLSML07m7b5uzxp5bUXySmUHqS17wiHrqoqDBOCQKZbZeWJKtIg 6Kz995vP9M43YBiCXXBq7qoBGYp78tBBJfVLgbM3vxQRjpyV6YN/FCa4G5ZZSbl7SF09 AI9aYzHs6EyaDdb1DPU+4KKNnFMZQeRFASvwX6faXwwcdKxCg+2nBsvj6xy/c+9ygZF+ GrPgHIhdck0lpOv04pZGBgM1Prq0evQv83inXSSuJs98aQh+8nNnvqwrS9TVQvYd5Qly +YlK+p8voCATDbVx5SHP+BGTP54osgv4Gjl23nYm0AxvZaxBFCipF0DCZitQgyOwp7c8 V8Hw== Received: by 10.236.192.138 with SMTP id i10mr10288322yhn.3.1331472974214; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 06:36:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.6.230] ([189.32.4.71]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g49sm30586496yhk.20.2012.03.11.06.36.11 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 11 Mar 2012 06:36:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20120311092213.55f4663b@scorpio> References: <4F5C950F.2020203@mailbox.sk> <201203110738.02969.lumiwa@gmail.com> <1331470527.25467.4.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> <20120311092213.55f4663b@scorpio> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:36:09 -0300 Message-ID: <1331472969.25467.11.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: portsnap problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:36:15 -0000 Em Dom, 2012-03-11 às 09:22 -0400, Jerry escreveu: > Actually, there are numerous "razors", Occam's being only one. Seems that "Murphy's Law". wins in this case... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 15:25:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFEBF106566B for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:25:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrm@ftfl.ca) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A878FC19 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:25:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcmm1 with SMTP id m1so4008178vcm.13 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:25:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=Xf8IdzGAs4x+jaRxaJ9ammN3+id/O5oGnhlZ3zPT4PU=; b=Wt7wBnHdSmgfdn2c6yPwaZKC9py9TLk3kZnWgJHAZoVgYjYQRtrHm5NGR6prMs3oFA Xnmsw89Sz70JISIguV+G3ikmaaHVU1M3UlV8cP9Rfsc533kCrOpYWtOjV1xYs7x4I98I xYGH9bNaJMijOVFQx3XaRcpvhx6WMqJZLoXnCqQaL9VU0bfZZB2K+2CtaBM4V9ppoUgm xI2GM4H5iZDBGjsH8g0TWMrb2a8XjDpp2mU6Wd/Uw1S58pnLScTgqi6b4/w/EHetCnVd 2bCt0V3aV4NaLMvAqTcQ8pI45TZkPUUiJdMOTBMMN+8RHsoSkr7n4szrSMgeagDsZA1P HgAA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.19.196 with SMTP id h4mr12196043vde.91.1331479508767; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:25:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.36.1 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:25:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [100.42.243.5] Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:25:08 -0300 Message-ID: From: Joseph Mingrone To: itetcu@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmQTmAwtG/F6R1CvTSBy4/x9MUsPzxv/fgdP4DxpbtLVkB8UyCpXhqoIY8TPBJYytv6GX+3 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: skype-2.1.0.81,1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:25:09 -0000 Hello; After installing net-im/skpe, the application starts up fine, but when I try to connect it times out after a few minutes and tells me "P2P Connect failed". In syslog I see Code: kernel: linux: pid 3175 (skype): ioctl fd=3D11, cmd=3D0x564a ('V',74) is not implemented. % uname -a: Code: FreeBSD phe.ath.cx 8.3-RC1 FreeBSD 8.3-RC1 #0: Sun Mar 4 00:42:38 UTC 2012 root@almeida.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386. % kldstat: Code: Id Refs Address Size Name 1 39 0xc0400000 c68d94 kernel 2 1 0xc1069000 f9d4 if_iwi.ko 3 1 0xc1079000 7120 snd_ich.ko 4 2 0xc1081000 57908 sound.ko 5 1 0xc10d9000 4f90 atapicam.ko 6 1 0xc10de000 4a64 cuse4bsd.ko 7 1 0xc575f000 8000 linprocfs.ko 8 1 0xc5777000 28000 linux.ko 9 1 0xc581d000 4000 fdescfs.ko 10 1 0xc598b000 30000 iwi_bss.ko 11 1 0xc5c2d000 68000 radeon.ko 12 1 0xc5c96000 14000 drm.ko net-im/skype-devel connects and generally seems to work fine, but video unfortunately doesn't work with the devel port. I've tried moving ~/.Skype, but no luck. I also tried creating a new skype account from the client, but this also times out. =CE=91m I doing something wrong? Cheers, J From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 15:29:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530E5106566C for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:29:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svyatoslav.lempert@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24498FC12 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:29:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so4016090lag.13 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:29:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=+S2nfhV96O1Z7bCD1VCVMU8iYc8EIftJ53pdIBWapOo=; b=KGELRHk9FHjOZF1mJMD8El5O3SoXIinNUv5dxV5Q4vDNLqnBrHLcKncnvwa5OyEtp0 8ctNGOBF1Mnnq08obH70y8V1HIfED8IaXWYGojGLru4kudQX7xcLukdUOFJkQFXDQi76 uKKxMPE/vViLarWyB4A++z2R/6nENNS8+6qYxjzCh2mFkPlgSTPuu73cUrec/4ZmIjqU tqGK2zKKrKR1fAOaEgw61KULC2Y09b39v2qERz3mh+J4JvtICE5TIuCFTxU2g8iDnkYC zxeqZ4mNFyTwrVp7X0TpwzDXyK6bPmuhgnpV9lT8lcSWChCh0QvYjIoZu285f6+ni9rd JYeQ== Received: by 10.112.27.199 with SMTP id v7mr3457139lbg.36.1331479769471; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:29:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.99.101 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:29:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Svyatoslav Lempert Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:29:09 +0900 Message-ID: To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: PHP 5.4.0 : lang/php54 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:29:31 -0000 Hello, please look http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165933 -- Svyatoslav From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 16:17:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840EC1065674; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:17:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6218FC17; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [88.217.84.198] (helo=localhost.my.domain) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S6lSJ-0005I6-0K; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:17:11 +0100 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2BGH92W003904; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:17:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id q2BGH8NG003903; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:17:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:17:07 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: Joseph Mingrone Message-ID: <20120311161707.GA3795@tinyCurrent> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT r214444 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 88.217.84.198 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, itetcu@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: skype-2.1.0.81,1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:17:14 -0000 El día Sunday, March 11, 2012 a las 12:25:08PM -0300, Joseph Mingrone escribió: > Hello; > > After installing net-im/skpe, the application starts up fine, but when > I try to connect it times out after a few minutes and tells me "P2P > Connect failed". In syslog I see > Code: > > kernel: linux: pid 3175 (skype): ioctl fd=11, cmd=0x564a ('V',74) is > not implemented. This means only that one of the V4L2 ioctls is not supported in the Linux emulation; it is perhaps unrelated to your connection problem; are you using some proxy or Skype over HTTPS; see the protocol connect and login sequence described in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skype_protocol and watch with tcpdump what is going on during connect; HIH matthias > > % uname -a: > Code: > > FreeBSD phe.ath.cx 8.3-RC1 FreeBSD 8.3-RC1 #0: Sun Mar 4 00:42:38 UTC > 2012 root@almeida.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386. > > % kldstat: > Code: > > Id Refs Address Size Name > 1 39 0xc0400000 c68d94 kernel > 2 1 0xc1069000 f9d4 if_iwi.ko > 3 1 0xc1079000 7120 snd_ich.ko > 4 2 0xc1081000 57908 sound.ko > 5 1 0xc10d9000 4f90 atapicam.ko > 6 1 0xc10de000 4a64 cuse4bsd.ko > 7 1 0xc575f000 8000 linprocfs.ko > 8 1 0xc5777000 28000 linux.ko > 9 1 0xc581d000 4000 fdescfs.ko > 10 1 0xc598b000 30000 iwi_bss.ko > 11 1 0xc5c2d000 68000 radeon.ko > 12 1 0xc5c96000 14000 drm.ko > > net-im/skype-devel connects and generally seems to work fine, but > video unfortunately doesn't work with the devel port. I've tried > moving ~/.Skype, but no luck. I also tried creating a new skype > account from the client, but this also times out. Αm I doing something > wrong? > > Cheers, > > J > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11 | UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2 | FreeBSD since 2.2.5 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 16:26:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CDD1106564A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:26:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru) Received: from eu1sys200aog117.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog117.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B76D18FC14 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:26:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob117.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKT1zSHLjV77K6lrhtUP0HGxSKMLlGRQtu@postini.com; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:26:05 UTC Received: by bkwq16 with SMTP id q16so2595925bkw.0 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:26:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :x-gm-message-state; bh=fLy469bDlpPatR8kcor135OXiPXtkbywMJg80XTHxtA=; b=Fu61kt35eiPel+TpPZKH+6S8VlYLZaRAo2wA6EKk4h47SCmwoCrsAORG2jQRrLnJ7T n8Pr4RAuYl8cHGzrwyJB3y0BoT6SeuyhzBXDpI+tfcZld6aGhbxBbIVqdSVLQPH2o4Tb 9fpbTl/xLHJruFWbiViTQVTwHiW2wIst1GHpir49yTLxJjV9jfAkwneGw+wmeWq8pYWE iiaTWVtXZ+kwdeECZD6rQYU7B53lZKzb7g3Oa2yJP7BtXww5h11atFykets6tgmzMZ8p /2H/udbz74Hea2RwexwwMoB0B8AI3GB0DeP6u/TwTenIZVpdO3Htkyhz9nwu0JXAJYwo vX6A== Received: by 10.205.133.210 with SMTP id hz18mr3574187bkc.117.1331483164074; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:26:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gizmo.my.domain (nat140-249-205-109.tvoe.tv. [109.205.249.140]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jc4sm20049161bkc.7.2012.03.11.09.26.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:26:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Mr Dandy To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:26:30 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-STABLE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201203112026.30630.subbsd@gmail.com> X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkpebqU7b+mDqAkW11jZK+i91L5QV2L9cHCuRWCL1Xcqz9omqClodj3rZ/8+4FF/HrBXVJj Cc: Svyatoslav Lempert , Alex Dupre Subject: Re: PHP 5.4.0 : lang/php54 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:26:06 -0000 On Sunday 11 March 2012 19:29:09 Svyatoslav Lempert wrote: > Hello, > please look http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165933 May be more correctly set PHP 5.4 by default to lang/php5, and repocopy current lang/php5 into lang/php53? Probably current maintainer of php (@ale) has the plan ;) PS: It will be nice to add an option for build PHP with DTRACE support: --- php54.orig/Makefile 2012-03-11 19:52:35.235493071 +0400 +++ php54/Makefile 2012-03-11 19:48:13.000000000 +0400 @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ MULTIBYTE "Enable zend multibyte support" off \ IPV6 "Enable ipv6 support" on \ MAILHEAD "Enable mail header patch" off \ + DTRACE "Build with DTrace probes" off CONFLICTS= php4-4* php5-pcre-* php5-spl-* php52-* @@ -132,6 +133,10 @@ CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--disable-ipv6 .endif +.if defined(WITH_DTRACE) +CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--enable-dtrace +.endif + post-patch: @${TOUCH} ${WRKSRC}/ext/php_config.h @${REINPLACE_CMD} "s|^\(extension_dir\)|; \1|" ${WRKSRC}/php.ini-* From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 17:04:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693BA106566B for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:04:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svyatoslav.lempert@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01078FC15 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:04:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so4061047lag.13 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:04:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=s0xAn+U6LlQciNGy+wfMrvwlmxSymUsnOTUvaCIfFgs=; b=slUq5BPl6dZt0RwbBqWYngIZ02+8u4nFYfCSYT+JzOptcvJp6dZ1RX7DroHS8Foamz XoHuF5wWp99/e58N77JtOaKt07oosvzE0gEGTvdJ6RqcrBdKbPi90cY7rmyi9J05bewp J5m3iyN2QlfH0z7nk3msj/yxfXPEtA6FxXG9buY1b06ohoZhxFATKJ4vbj1urQkOMkcN wfQoFF3972g5QVZZTbnCYUI3EQl+Jm4Ep9x/4AWkrj5/zo6Hs55JfmQ/VyUoM0hkFlWW 2S4BdF4hI02nw7GE2U+BM8OpJetbAlY1Z98LkggZaoKAkMNJYbg9MpJXW5cbii+J7vTt WeVQ== Received: by 10.112.37.40 with SMTP id v8mr2819148lbj.8.1331485493707; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:04:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.99.101 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:04:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201203112026.30630.subbsd@gmail.com> References: <201203112026.30630.subbsd@gmail.com> From: Svyatoslav Lempert Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:04:33 +0900 Message-ID: To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Alex Dupre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: Re: PHP 5.4.0 : lang/php54 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:04:55 -0000 2012/3/12 Mr Dandy : >> please look http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165933 > > May be more correctly set PHP 5.4 by default to lang/php5, and repocopy > current lang/php5 into lang/php53? > No, I wrote about this a few weeks ago to ports@ - PHP 5.4 is not compatible with PHP 5.3, depricated funtions now removed. > Probably current maintainer of php (@ale) has the plan ;) > > PS: It will be nice to add an option for build PHP with DTRACE support: > Of course all this discussion, I posted "actually draft" -- Svyatoslav From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 17:23:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B96D1065673 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:23:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrm@ftfl.ca) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4EC88FC16 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:23:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcmm1 with SMTP id m1so4099837vcm.13 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:23:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=1krnMyK7IWDcI0RrRVaBgd5HgVQirYVeni3UkYuuhYM=; b=QblyC5Tbzrf/O2NN9H6eYsGEeuPfmp7A6bVovj+NDXn79j08oBOXjA05oV8mUw3YIb qqIUhyewhSBMKyAcdHDJV+A53FtFQ2FCz68DFRmd7X9dSpzgcsxPTbpzVUoNpxK09AMQ dba1+EGFYErVzdKWE3uabpKcH/EcY14wVsF9Vo0JThqu+pwaTqlFlQoZBnazZAtAUsWV RO1H6CajL9vHYY1RgMipmUeA3Gkb9IJ1b41KvwBlG3wNqBDYqwxT2h5nPElktaStacm+ jIpF3xsF4UZimdclQQjQws3UQ+gVzH3zvbxxBJwf7IHiAv2va95Gry4Pwe01Vwg/EiCU 4QAg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.28.228 with SMTP id e4mr12530284vdh.57.1331486636128; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:23:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.36.1 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:23:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [100.42.243.5] In-Reply-To: <20120311161707.GA3795@tinyCurrent> References: <20120311161707.GA3795@tinyCurrent> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:23:56 -0300 Message-ID: From: Joseph Mingrone To: Matthias Apitz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmUc4LvQSpK1nQgTELxb4Az+wmF8yerJrglopqZoTWGxe9s+/hqqTVwE6B3WNd2QBVEZCnV Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: skype-2.1.0.81,1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:23:57 -0000 Hi Matthia, ports; Thanks for you reply. I think I'm getting closer to finding out what's going on. I have a small LAN, which normally just has a single laptop and a skype phone behind a Buffalo wireless access point / router. The skype phone is usually on all the time and I haven't had problems with it for the two or three years I've owned it. Last night when I was testing the skype client on my laptop I turned the phone off. So this morning when I got your message, I uninstalled net-im/skype-devel and reinstalled net-im/skype and it signed in immediately. But now, the skype phone has the problem the client had last night: it won't sign in. Even when I sign out with both the client and the phone and try the phone it won't sign in, but the client has no problems at all today. I thought there must be a problem with the router, so I rebooted, but the result is the same: client has no problems, but no luck with the phone. Is this a networking issue on my end or is it something to do with skype? J From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 17:33:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBEA91065670 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:33:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA568FC19 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:33:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [88.217.84.198] (helo=localhost.my.domain) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S6meC-0002Ep-9O; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:33:32 +0100 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2BHXUXt004129; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:33:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id q2BHXTbk004128; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:33:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:33:29 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: Joseph Mingrone Message-ID: <20120311173329.GA4093@tinyCurrent> References: <20120311161707.GA3795@tinyCurrent> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT r214444 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 88.217.84.198 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: skype-2.1.0.81,1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:33:35 -0000 El da Sunday, March 11, 2012 a las 02:23:56PM -0300, Joseph Mingrone escribi: > Hi Matthia, ports; > > Thanks for you reply. I think I'm getting closer to finding out > what's going on. > > I have a small LAN, which normally just has a single laptop and a > skype phone behind a Buffalo wireless access point / router. The > skype phone is usually on all the time and I haven't had problems with > it for the two or three years I've owned it. Last night when I was > testing the skype client on my laptop I turned the phone off. > > So this morning when I got your message, I uninstalled > net-im/skype-devel and reinstalled net-im/skype and it signed in > immediately. But now, the skype phone has the problem the client had > last night: it won't sign in. Even when I sign out with both the > client and the phone and try the phone it won't sign in, but the > client has no problems at all today. I thought there must be a > problem with the router, so I rebooted, but the result is the same: > client has no problems, but no luck with the phone. > > Is this a networking issue on my end or is it something to do with skype? This is difficult to guess and impossible to solve from remote. It sounds a bit like some NAT issue in the router and the first client connecting to Skype wins. No sure, though. HIH matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11 | UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2 | FreeBSD since 2.2.5 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 17:34:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C582C106566B; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:34:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexanderchuranov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED938FC20; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:34:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaaf13 with SMTP id f13so841036eaa.13 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:34:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=1lx+T+hO7fLuFt6PioTY3yC7txmUgv4w+qWF0s28I8s=; b=GBOkV8tqznoUiBaYz0d4e8pR3vfFPJXGmxXHoa/0tIVG9Fsr5zTGC/1IKIWL6jiLT4 dhu2lg8DYoXnxGPc9A7W65UAOZufNBghVdmQ840PsRmhnDUxOE7z3R7naBvdtMMZRbRW vz4Qag5dB54OBt7knnUEqnkBUKdm2lDmLmIEHWEGGHS6xTCMNua8rRonMs9JqpZJpHjm VefCxJTQB2CSG8maXa51bjyos2Y6p8Oh5wDG+Tnsy69Z0gsRw1lyF7cBrAt1qvL4Ie4j N9Oj0vmILESz2oLZzObq2zGc/0W4YClk6QTdIISfHSdQnJYZc53ZaWdvxG9lsbnNnb1L IyQg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.17.205 with SMTP id t13mr813197eba.4.1331487240990; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:34:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.31.133 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:34:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:34:00 +0400 Message-ID: From: Alexander Churanov To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: avg@freebsd.org, dev2@heesakkers.info, boost-ports , sem@freebsd.org, linimon@lonesome.com, martymac@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boost ports update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:34:02 -0000 Folks, I've fixed devel/sdts++. The patch is here: http://alexanderchuranov.com/boost-port/devel-sdts++-boost-148-2012-03-11_20-23-23.diff Alexander Churanov, maintainer of devel/boost-* From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 17:40:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46C3106564A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:40:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CAF8FC18 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:40:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E03828426; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:33:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (ip-86-49-61-235.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.61.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0ED2528424; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:33:48 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F5CE1FA.8080905@quip.cz> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:33:46 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mr Dandy References: <201203112026.30630.subbsd@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201203112026.30630.subbsd@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Svyatoslav Lempert , Alex Dupre , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PHP 5.4.0 : lang/php54 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:40:16 -0000 Mr Dandy wrote: > On Sunday 11 March 2012 19:29:09 Svyatoslav Lempert wrote: >> Hello, >> please look http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165933 > > May be more correctly set PHP 5.4 by default to lang/php5, and repocopy > current lang/php5 into lang/php53? It is to early to make it a default PHP port. 5.4 is not backward compatible with 5.3 and it will be really bad for users to accidentaly upgrade to 5.4 instead of just update 5.3 install. +1 for make it lang/php54 for those who need it / want it to testing and development. Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 17:59:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CBB11065670 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:59:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrm@ftfl.ca) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4198C8FC0A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcmm1 with SMTP id m1so4126199vcm.13 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:59:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=4DISAYUFfoz3NOgm5gVUvEvl1f+ZKAniM5oH1NdfxBE=; b=QieAuaAlwiqpWe0lq4WMHmT4IBRjqchRpI16xvD1fJ3e1qildBLzadqUr/nhmNvwoB YNxn8SuwGzsPVR20Kv9TQ1ofaeyhR4MCsIAgR1eSCieRwYPTTkCHAXpMaYR/jeYBuOak M0SxLi5AvsNYPRuXRs+nGN976kezabmBms7M683kT730tsAEL+Ui6bSIdA6b034P22zT +J5861tYUx2RZqLdq7rTQcsUNrBPkRQ8ZqUeMxh12TxiEZiibArSOSn407nJUhgUIy8N 1O5yPUC61p4MGSaABcFMMQSe2h2H0ltKNRDylhxFiEhSm0rBTgCMhPnIKvmT8fviSTw8 1l8Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.24.40 with SMTP id r8mr12433740vdf.108.1331488751535; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:59:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.36.1 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:59:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [100.42.243.5] In-Reply-To: <20120311173329.GA4093@tinyCurrent> References: <20120311161707.GA3795@tinyCurrent> <20120311173329.GA4093@tinyCurrent> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:59:11 -0300 Message-ID: From: Joseph Mingrone To: ports@freebsd.org, Matthias Apitz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlW44+4mYhGavFAQwEDRPVxhpQsnLNLd+Po75Sm8W0pFssfdh7H/YJ0tSebgv4a1ubpwJsS Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: skype-2.1.0.81,1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:59:12 -0000 On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 14:33, Matthias Apitz wrote: > It sounds a bit like some NAT issue in the router and the first client > connecting to Skype wins. No sure, though. I'm going on a few assumptions that I'll have to verify, but a reboot of the router should flush the "first" client, but as of today,it's always the laptop client who wins and the phone who fails. Thanks for your help. J From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 18:09:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F63106564A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:09:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cg@drimsel.org) Received: from core.mokelbu.de (core.mokelbu.de [85.10.222.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76CF8FC12 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.103] (port-92-201-171-65.dynamic.qsc.de [92.201.171.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by core.mokelbu.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A134C49297; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:37:00 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F5CE2B9.7050002@drimsel.org> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:36:57 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Carsten_Gn=F6rlich?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20111110 Icedove/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "C. P. Ghost" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------070909000806020608020009" Cc: chalpin@cs.wisc.edu, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, carsten@dvdisaster.org Subject: Re: sysutils/dvdisaster coredumps on FreeBSD/amd64 RELENG_9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:09:59 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070909000806020608020009 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi C. P. and all, > @Carsten: I hope you can pinpoint the problem. I suspect > a change in FreeBSD's CAM layer API/ABI that causes some > sort of buffer overrun on RELENG_9. The patch points to the > exact line of code that causes dvdisaster 0.72.3 to crash. Thanks for the report. You're right about the memory corruption occurring in the line you commented out; it's a data size mismatch triggered by a size change in struct scsi_sense_data. The attached patch corrects the problem. A new upstream release will be made after some more testing. Cheers, Carsten -- Carsten Gnrlich * Project homepage http://www.dvdisaster.org dvdisaster: Additional error correction for CD and DVD media. GnuPG FP: 12B3 1535 AF90 3ADE 9E73 BA7E 5A59 0EFE F5F6 C46C --------------070909000806020608020009 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="freebsd.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="freebsd.patch" --- /dev/shm/dvdisaster-0.72.3/scsi-freebsd.c 2011-10-02 20:32:04.000000000 +0200 +++ scsi-freebsd.c 2012-03-11 18:19:09.000000000 +0100 @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ Stop("illegal data_mode: %d", data_mode); } - cam_fill_csio(&ccb->csio, 1, NULL, flags, CAM_TAG_ACTION_NONE,//MSG_SIMPLE_Q_TAG, buf, size, sizeof(struct scsi_sense_data), cdb_size, 120*1000); /* 120 secs timeout */ @@ -194,7 +193,7 @@ /* Extract sense data */ - memcpy(sense, &(ccb->csio.sense_data), sizeof(struct scsi_sense_data)); + memcpy(sense, &(ccb->csio.sense_data), sizeof(Sense)); if((ccb->ccb_h.status & CAM_STATUS_MASK) == CAM_REQ_CMP) return 0; @@ -204,8 +203,6 @@ status = ccb->csio.scsi_status; return -1; - - } #endif /* SYS_FREEBSD */ --------------070909000806020608020009-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 18:15:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609781065678 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:15:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chalpin+d+1332353238.6ade2a@cs.wisc.edu) Received: from sabe.cs.wisc.edu (sabe.cs.wisc.edu [128.105.6.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1848FC0A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spiff.home.crhalpin.org (eagleheights-105-18.resnet.wisc.edu [146.151.105.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by sabe.cs.wisc.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q2BI7OxC032592 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:07:24 -0500 Received: by spiff.home.crhalpin.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F288E1CC37; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:07:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hobbes.home.crhalpin.org (suzie.home.crhalpin.org [192.168.1.1]) by spiff.home.crhalpin.org (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:07:11 -0500 Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:07:11 -0500 To: Carsten =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gn=F6rlich?= Message-ID: <20120311180711.GA2089@hobbes.home.crhalpin.org> References: <4F5CE2B9.7050002@drimsel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0F1p//8PRICkK4MW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F5CE2B9.7050002@drimsel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) From: Corey Halpin X-Primary-Address: chalpin@cs.wisc.edu X-Hashcash: 1:26:120302:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org::HUt5XZzi78w1PvFv:000000000PlKU Cc: "C. P. Ghost" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysutils/dvdisaster coredumps on FreeBSD/amd64 RELENG_9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Corey Halpin List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:15:44 -0000 --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That's excellent. Thank you, Carsten. I'll update the FreeBSD port to= =20 include your patch, and will be watching for the new upstream release. CPGhost: thank you for your work to track this down. ~crh On 2012-03-11, Carsten Gn=F6rlich wrote: >Hi C. P. and all, > >> @Carsten: I hope you can pinpoint the problem. I suspect >> a change in FreeBSD's CAM layer API/ABI that causes some >> sort of buffer overrun on RELENG_9. The patch points to the >> exact line of code that causes dvdisaster 0.72.3 to crash. > >Thanks for the report. You're right about the memory >corruption occurring in the line you commented out; >it's a data size mismatch triggered by a size change >in struct scsi_sense_data. > >The attached patch corrects the problem. >A new upstream release will be made after some >more testing. > >Cheers, > Carsten > >--=20 >Carsten Gn=F6rlich * Project homepage http://www.dvdisaster.org >dvdisaster: Additional error correction for CD and DVD media. >GnuPG FP: 12B3 1535 AF90 3ADE 9E73 BA7E 5A59 0EFE F5F6 C46C >--- /dev/shm/dvdisaster-0.72.3/scsi-freebsd.c 2011-10-02 20:32:04.00000000= 0 +0200 >+++ scsi-freebsd.c 2012-03-11 18:19:09.000000000 +0100 >@@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ > Stop("illegal data_mode: %d", data_mode); > } >=20 >- > cam_fill_csio(&ccb->csio, 1, NULL, flags, CAM_TAG_ACTION_NONE,//MSG_SI= MPLE_Q_TAG, > buf, size, sizeof(struct scsi_sense_data), cdb_size,=20 > 120*1000); /* 120 secs timeout */ >@@ -194,7 +193,7 @@ >=20 > /* Extract sense data */ >=20 >- memcpy(sense, &(ccb->csio.sense_data), sizeof(struct scsi_sense_data)); >+ memcpy(sense, &(ccb->csio.sense_data), sizeof(Sense)); >=20 > if((ccb->ccb_h.status & CAM_STATUS_MASK) =3D=3D CAM_REQ_CMP) > return 0; >@@ -204,8 +203,6 @@ > status =3D ccb->csio.scsi_status; >=20 > return -1; >- >- =20 > } >=20 > #endif /* SYS_FREEBSD */ --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iF4EAREIAAYFAk9c6c4ACgkQR8PgTIRJoTXYuQD9HZZyf8hC7eoCQHzH2oU+pXnG m1CZX4jy7Br2aCmtm2cBAIHFhQpGz/jdmQGal04tC9iWgADMHKqPxeNo4NtJnNSH =jPlB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 18:39:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C88D106564A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:39:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1683D8FC1F for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:39:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871B17E873; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:39:10 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4F5CF147.6060606@acsalaska.net> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:39:03 +0100 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joseph Mingrone References: <20120311161707.GA3795@tinyCurrent> <20120311173329.GA4093@tinyCurrent> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Matthias Apitz Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: skype-2.1.0.81,1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:39:12 -0000 On 3/11/2012 18:59, Joseph Mingrone wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 14:33, Matthias Apitz wrote: >> It sounds a bit like some NAT issue in the router and the first client >> connecting to Skype wins. No sure, though. > > I'm going on a few assumptions that I'll have to verify, but a reboot > of the router should flush the "first" client, but as of today,it's > always the laptop client who wins and the phone who fails. I've had issues like this when I was still using Skype. Very hard to trace, but I had the feeling that a login gets bound to a client-id or client version and that failed attempts to log in mark a client-id/client version invalid. When this happened to me, I used the website password reset feature and it would then let me sign on with the new client. It's a shot in the dark, but worth testing. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 18:39:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246C1106566C for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:39:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0E18FC15 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:39:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.204.138.72] (helo=tiny.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S6nfx-0003yz-4C; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:39:25 +0100 Received: from tiny.Sisis.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2BIdMij001169; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:39:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q2BIdKXR001168; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:39:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: tiny.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:39:20 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: Joseph Mingrone Message-ID: <20120311183920.GA1105@tiny> References: <20120311161707.GA3795@tinyCurrent> <20120311173329.GA4093@tinyCurrent> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r226986 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.138.72 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: skype-2.1.0.81,1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:39:28 -0000 El da Sunday, March 11, 2012 a las 02:59:11PM -0300, Joseph Mingrone escribi: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 14:33, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > It sounds a bit like some NAT issue in the router and the first client > > connecting to Skype wins. No sure, though. > > I'm going on a few assumptions that I'll have to verify, but a reboot > of the router should flush the "first" client, but as of today,it's > always the laptop client who wins and the phone who fails. You are sure that the Skype in the laptop is really down, are yoy? Sometimes it is only away from the desktop and sits (connected) in the background, depending how you close it ... HIH matthias -- Matthias Apitz e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 18:46:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF402106567A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:46:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrm@ftfl.ca) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA448FC14 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:46:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcmm1 with SMTP id m1so4162855vcm.13 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:46:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=daqir1Z8oGQgrwX1Z2dKa0/Ht9o616GffmQL79qG4GM=; b=ptCgsbJ6W+jMgSVnDuCcWwZd60+LIArSFryen9I41u8h7biy04VVuu3M4Fr0A7Zssx FYX2CwzuFtq/Pv5nYAuUQmVF6bRaO/nOlsiC4HA6/+RbBP1+46t+5dMNqEa/cpP7sVEW aSqNCG6NHZXKEN/Zj+6lsJL33P0uTOj9kdmeI9Cc0GUt/L5MRutrGhuA2Da1V3bq5DFI W9tCWm1fTb47ddLVa0xtHK6MLaJPnUnux6Rb0ElrdqHGcUSNvdGlrRNGC7hKrh7bqdmU Tg0Clt7iisp/Rb8toTjkmQ0wAqfJzFjS1AQBYAy40oPkLHYZVGKR5bEnd5ORIoBHuqdM XnZA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.93.18 with SMTP id cq18mr12681227vdb.40.1331491580702; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:46:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.36.1 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:46:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [100.42.243.5] In-Reply-To: <4F5CF147.6060606@acsalaska.net> References: <20120311161707.GA3795@tinyCurrent> <20120311173329.GA4093@tinyCurrent> <4F5CF147.6060606@acsalaska.net> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:46:20 -0300 Message-ID: From: Joseph Mingrone To: Mel Flynn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnxFFz3W2faUAv86wuzSPldKsBdLK/C6hwvMxd9pcOZYRsZPPUn15sxfAceCUlc6XowibWD Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Matthias Apitz Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: skype-2.1.0.81,1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:46:21 -0000 On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 15:39, Mel Flynn wrote: > I've had issues like this when I was still using Skype. Very hard to > trace, but I had the feeling that a login gets bound to a client-id or > client version and that failed attempts to log in mark a > client-id/client version invalid. When this happened to me, I used the > website password reset feature and it would then let me sign on with the > new client. Thanks Mel. This seems plausible, but for the moment won't be necessary because to reset anything because after about an hour the phone successfully signed in while the laptop client was already signed in. I'm starting to understand why you stopped using skype. Searching for alternatives has moved a few places up my priority list. Thanks again Mel and Matthias. J From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 19:39:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76A51065670 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:39:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2C88FC14 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:39:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1S6oby-0006PH-Py>; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:39:22 +0100 Received: from e178023062.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.23.62] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1S6oby-0005Ns-K4>; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:39:22 +0100 Message-ID: <4F5CFF64.3020902@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:39:16 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120223 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ports FreeBSD X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB2880957F3EFD8F7A6F1AF20" X-Originating-IP: 85.178.23.62 Cc: Subject: Building a port with math/superlu fails: linking a shared obj library adding archive superlu.a fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:39:24 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB2880957F3EFD8F7A6F1AF20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm about to build a port of the AMES stereopipeline on FreeBSD. Regrettably, a portion of the sources expect to have superlu's library and this library is added as a shared object dependency in IsisIO. As expected, compiling fails with the error [...] IsisInterfaceMapLineScan.cc:92:11: warning: variable 'lon_lat_radius' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] CXX IsisAdjustCameraModel.lo CXXLD libaspIsisIO.la /usr/local/bin/ld: /usr/local/lib/libsuperlu.a(dgssvx.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/local/lib/libsuperlu.a: could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status *** [libaspIsisIO.la] Error code 1 [...] Well, the portion in the GNU automake Makefile.am controlling the build of the library in IsisIO looks like this: =3D=3D # __BEGIN_LICENSE__ # Copyright (C) 2006-2011 United States Government as represented by # the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.= # All Rights Reserved. # __END_LICENSE__ #########################################################################= # sources #########################################################################= if MAKE_MODULE_ISISIO include_HEADERS =3D BaseEquation.h Equation.h PolyEquation.h \= RPNEquation.h DiskImageResourceIsis.h \ IsisCameraModel.h \ IsisInterface.h IsisInterfaceFrame.h \ IsisInterfaceLineScan.h IsisInterfaceMapFrame.h \ IsisInterfaceMapLineScan.h IsisAdjustCameraModel.h libaspIsisIO_la_SOURCES =3D DiskImageResourceIsis.cc Equation.cc \= PolyEquation.cc RPNEquation.cc IsisInterface.cc \ IsisInterfaceFrame.cc IsisInterfaceLineScan.cc \ IsisInterfaceMapFrame.cc IsisInterfaceMapLineScan.cc \ IsisAdjustCameraModel.cc libaspIsisIO_la_LIBADD =3D @MODULE_ISISIO_LIBS@ lib_LTLIBRARIES =3D libaspIsisIO.la endif #########################################################################= # general #########################################################################= AM_CPPFLAGS =3D @ASP_CPPFLAGS@ AM_LDFLAGS =3D @ASP_LDFLAGS@ -version-info @LIBTOOL_VERSION@ SUBDIRS =3D . tests includedir =3D $(prefix)/include/asp/IsisIO include $(top_srcdir)/config/rules.mak =3D=3D libaspIsisIO_la_LIBADD =3D @MODULE_ISISIO_LIBS@ seems the bad place causing the error, since MODULE_ISISIO_LIBS is expanded containing -lsuperlu, but the "lib" is an archive /usr/local/lib/superlu.a. Well, I didn't check how the thing called Linux is welding together this library and what they do by compiling the AMES Stereo Pipeline. Well, contact me by MAIL (do not subscribe this list!), if you have suggestions or tips and want to share with me. Regards, Oliver --------------enigB2880957F3EFD8F7A6F1AF20 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPXP9pAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8RRMH/R0YRfv65ednPZ4asMR6Dg0+ 1qCensSUpc6mA7nS5193HyABqrBezaLYPJadZemcn69bkBGRKCMN++XC0GAYT8Xe guj8B7xmCFDX0U48N/347vPexQl8Z8+H1XRUwe+9SF93Idk680cbr3erPA+qdG0L PKzW0eT8Cujoz44nX50CjJDUVU3JA8d3+milDV/j/Zdw3jJ/jta92iCb74Qe6NQU SgMXnFvFKI5YpMMRtdJb5OC/DCgG6s4PhkSAIMp+7MExdTVAVqX4FqpTRPylCrtv TWJN8zFsDgEd5Zx1xX9QaxShyb717FPKrBN0F/VOX+CozPx+V0SWUD2GQDqY2fY= =nEcL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB2880957F3EFD8F7A6F1AF20-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 20:47:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E74106566B for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:47:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86038FC16 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C3F7E84C; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:47:38 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4F5D0F62.9050001@acsalaska.net> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:47:30 +0100 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "O. Hartmann" References: <4F5CFF64.3020902@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <4F5CFF64.3020902@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ports FreeBSD Subject: Re: Building a port with math/superlu fails: linking a shared obj library adding archive superlu.a fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:47:40 -0000 On 3/11/2012 20:39, O. Hartmann wrote: > [...] > IsisInterfaceMapLineScan.cc:92:11: warning: variable 'lon_lat_radius' > set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] > CXX IsisAdjustCameraModel.lo > CXXLD libaspIsisIO.la > /usr/local/bin/ld: /usr/local/lib/libsuperlu.a(dgssvx.o): relocation > R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used when making a > shared object; recompile with -fPIC > /usr/local/lib/libsuperlu.a: could not read symbols: Bad value > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > *** [libaspIsisIO.la] Error code 1 Are you using USE_AUTOTOOLS=libtool but not automake? I'm seeing similar issues with zarafa if I do just that. If I let the port use the provided libtool *or* use the entire autotools toolchain, then all is well. Also, adding --with-pic to CONFIGURE_ARGS does not change either outcome. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 21:40:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47CD6106564A; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:40:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from emx.nitro.dk (emx.nitro.dk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:120:7384::102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049F08FC16; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:40:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailscan.leto.nitro.dk (mailscan.leto.nitro.dk [127.0.1.4]) by emx.nitro.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E84E21313B; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from emx.nitro.dk ([127.0.1.2]) by mailscan.leto.nitro.dk (mailscan.leto.nitro.dk [127.0.1.4]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id MJxxggS-aNes; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.4.23] (unknown [89.100.2.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by emx.nitro.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0031E213139; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:40:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Simon L. B. Nielsen" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:40:26 +0000 References: <201203112132.q2BLWwTZ074498@repoman.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org, security@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <0E8E530C-BD7D-46BD-80A0-BE947D73429E@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Cc: Subject: Upgrade port audit now! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:40:31 -0000 Hey, If you have portaudit installed, you should upgrade sooner rather than = later! Begin forwarded message: > From: "Simon L. Nielsen" > Subject: cvs commit: ports/ports-mgmt/portaudit Makefile pkg-plist = ports/ports-mgmt/portaudit/files portaudit-cmd.sh > Date: 11 March 2012 21:32:58 GMT > To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, = cvs-all@FreeBSD.org >=20 > simon 2012-03-11 21:32:58 UTC >=20 > FreeBSD ports repository >=20 > Modified files: > ports-mgmt/portaudit Makefile pkg-plist=20 > ports-mgmt/portaudit/files portaudit-cmd.sh=20 > Log: > Portaudit 0.6.0: >=20 > Fix remote code execution which can occur with a specially crafted > audit file. The attacker would need to get the portaudit(1) to > download the bad audit database, e.g. by performing a man in the > middle attack. >=20 > Add signature verification of the portaudit database. The public key > is for the database generated for portaudit.FreeBSD.org is included > in the distribution. >=20 > Submitted by: Michael Gmelin > Reported by: Michael Gmelin , Joerg Scheinert > Security: Remote code execution > Security: = http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/6d329b64-6bbb-11e1-9166-001e4f0fb9b1.html > Feature safe: yes > With hat: so --=20 Simon L. B. Nielsen FreeBSD Deputy Security Officer From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 21:53:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC2E106564A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:53:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41B58FC12 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:53:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1S6qhb-0002N6-VQ>; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:53:20 +0100 Received: from e178023062.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.23.62] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1S6qhb-0003LR-Pt>; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:53:19 +0100 Message-ID: <4F5D1EC6.9040403@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:53:10 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120223 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mel Flynn References: <4F5CFF64.3020902@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4F5D0F62.9050001@acsalaska.net> In-Reply-To: <4F5D0F62.9050001@acsalaska.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDAF1E48FFD59D904781A65C3" X-Originating-IP: 85.178.23.62 Cc: Ports FreeBSD Subject: Re: Building a port with math/superlu fails: linking a shared obj library adding archive superlu.a fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:53:21 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDAF1E48FFD59D904781A65C3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/11/12 21:47, Mel Flynn wrote: > On 3/11/2012 20:39, O. Hartmann wrote: >=20 >> [...] >> IsisInterfaceMapLineScan.cc:92:11: warning: variable 'lon_lat_radius'= >> set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] >> CXX IsisAdjustCameraModel.lo >> CXXLD libaspIsisIO.la >> /usr/local/bin/ld: /usr/local/lib/libsuperlu.a(dgssvx.o): relocation >> R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used when making a >> shared object; recompile with -fPIC >> /usr/local/lib/libsuperlu.a: could not read symbols: Bad value >> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status >> *** [libaspIsisIO.la] Error code 1 >=20 > Are you using USE_AUTOTOOLS=3Dlibtool but not automake? Neither, nor. I need to run a script called "autogen" in the root folder provided with the sources as a pre-configure tagged operation. I tried using USE_AUTOTOOLS=3D autogen, but this fails. I got it now working so far, except the described error. It isn't possible to compile xxx_la_LTLIBRARIES by merging different libraries with an archive. As of my understanding, the archive of superlu needs to be treated like an ordinary .o file that is compiled into a to-be-created shared object. And in this task I fail, since the whole build logic does not consider an archive. Could math/superlu be compiled that way that it produce a shared object instead of this clumsy ordinary superlu.a archive? > I'm seeing similar issues with zarafa if I do just that. If I let the > port use the provided libtool *or* use the entire autotools toolchain, > then all is well. Also, adding --with-pic to CONFIGURE_ARGS does not > change either outcome. --------------enigDAF1E48FFD59D904781A65C3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPXR7PAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8dtMIALUiz6w30+UsPE8UgJB16NAg zB2d0D1ZMHddQM55J+yL9sVO0IexczfKwD1SZqTjmAFBd9iLJWIXgRe1acsZhtLn bSWeLMWjN16W9mzrU4fQTNGaCGF9sF+qBwIJaPQaFNXqlg49mnKiGhE1oDrh5i2H SxwM3GSD5TPGKWed0frFpY8kQwiNZpf/44XcVM5tBCK2frJWv/KcTPEloAJdaKKU vCAjRLhpFYlF7CD3rAte2nEfzoOHRwdLpfAr7QC+VO2si7Yeg7ekwhehbGUZT66D rIsGuQI/nBGPB+DRJm01233SHKjgG11Npo/2R3evEIrs4dC3fR0+r7d2ABkbork= =/UjY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDAF1E48FFD59D904781A65C3-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 05:01:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A54106564A for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 05:01:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@experts-exchange.com) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.pub.dw.redsrci.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4758FC15 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 05:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C925771811B; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:55:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=e-e.com; h= user-agent:organization:in-reply-to:content-type:content-type :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:subject:from:from :date:date:received:received:received; s=ee; t=1331528115; x= 1333342515; bh=lAO4bH074VEdQrhYTUdvjs0zKqsNEASHmZfkwQkD3DY=; b=J x2BN5ob3647rVzeCYLBJL9h9ZKe5isyLRAkVRi9N1h5KXR/yVFLEhnyj3V7xf6/G MVArIWSROm8yhaxlD9DbDy6YWoBiM2S/SzES4oh6WVakb1eMgV3ztdBA+7AGZF7y 1rXJ2VmjKRr8M0HwDA+7/TyYpHQWctUzIOfrBSywcc= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.dw.redsrci.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xlm1v6peeQb4; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:55:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from experts-exchange.com (unknown [192.168.103.120]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A5B6571811A; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:55:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 32296 invoked by uid 1001); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 04:54:30 -0000 Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:54:30 -0700 From: Jason Helfman To: carmel_ny@hotmail.com Message-ID: <20120312045430.GA32251@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> References: <20120228230200.GA68943@closedsrc.org> <20120228235517.GC98785@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed In-Reply-To: <20120228235517.GC98785@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE amd64 Organization: Experts-Exchange, LLC. http://www.experts-exchange.com X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Linh Pham , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating getmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 05:01:19 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 03:55:17PM -0800, Jason Helfman thus spake: >>> Are there any plans to update getmail version 4.23.0 released:20 >>> November 2011 to version 4.25.0 released 1 February 2012? >> >>I am on a business trip right now, but if you want to submit a PR with >>the changes to the new version, I'm would greatly welcome that. I've just committed this update. Thanks for the report! - -jgh - -- Jason Helfman System Administrator experts-exchange.com http://www.experts-exchange.com/M_4830110.html E4AD 7CF1 1396 27F6 79DD 4342 5E92 AD66 8C8C FBA5 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iF4EAREIAAYFAk9dgYYACgkQXpKtZoyM+6XneQD+Icj/8bb5nnpzJqusFtxlDKqB Uiw5IcesexgvRy88WK4A/0aW37wIiUW3iSM6PEAukzGU0rTgfvBK+caF1Ip2gT5J =RUNB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 06:37:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEB3106566C for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 06:37:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@freebsd.org) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (cl-414.sto-01.se.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:16d8:ff00:19d::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47B58FC19 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 06:37:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (c-98-234-218-159.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.234.218.159]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 471868FC27; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:37:46 +0400 (MSK) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Stanislav Sedov In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 23:37:42 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <39525998-1498-49DD-AE3D-45C23C4B85C9@freebsd.org> References: To: Royce Williams X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -> portmaster Rosetta Stone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 06:37:49 -0000 On Feb 25, 2012, at 10:21 AM, Royce Williams wrote: > I noticed that the portupgrade port got returned to ports@ with this note: > > ports-mgmt/portupgrade > - Reassign to ports@ > please consider using ports-mgmt/portmaster > > Discussed with: bugmeister(eadler, linimon), ruby(swills, pgollucci) via > #bsdports > 22 Feb 2012 - pgollucci > http://www.freshports.org/ports-mgmt/portupgrade/ > > > To ease the transition, does anyone know of a Rosetta Stone table, or > "portmaster for native speakers of port upgrade" Please note, however, that this does not mean that port upgrade disappears. The latest version is available on the github and the portupgrade-devel port was set up to track the github version. Not sure what happened to that port since then. The recommendation to switch is just seems to be an opinion of the people listed on the "discussed with" line. The application itself was never supported by ports people and mostly is a work of two outstanding individuals, Akinori MUSHA and Sergey Matveychuk. I'm trying to keep it in a working shape as much as I could. -- ST4096-RIPE From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 07:20:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285881065672; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:20:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0534F8FC15; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 8CAA6561EC; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:19:59 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:19:59 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Stanislav Sedov Message-ID: <20120312071959.GA7668@lonesome.com> References: <39525998-1498-49DD-AE3D-45C23C4B85C9@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <39525998-1498-49DD-AE3D-45C23C4B85C9@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Royce Williams , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -> portmaster Rosetta Stone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:20:00 -0000 On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:37:42PM -0700, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > The application itself was never supported by ports people and mostly is a > work of two outstanding individuals, Akinori MUSHA and Sergey Matveychuk. > I'm trying to keep it in a working shape as much as I could. And all of this hard work has been appreciated. OTOH I has assumed that since you had given up your ports commit bit you weren't interested in working on ports issues anymore. I apologize if I was mistaken. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 08:38:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256E51065679; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:38:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexanderchuranov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B718FC14; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaaf13 with SMTP id f13so946060eaa.13 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 01:38:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=z7LY9hb1BdGUl+/xAjtMQTr51mv6HTX5t8SSt7CUT8M=; b=SJOh0iYStwXaW/Ae389/SWZmGXDahnvLGoYHIxeL/UreCMIYQWbunCZvNbFCnAl7fs MXf0yk/jgMSbvgJ3lav6id5ip/3qNEC44w3ddhWAqN+XhG+ZMLNCAAfvQZiVGm1fHyHk fawnXW2/EtaR9gRk4VcyZg/vNgIUWywOQ1GIpY1Y+Aksx9j1jzx5ddHFaChUb2OEUFS+ iOt7ghHHRnB/d4L17/iZ4r9RmX1mBxrNT0Wx42pep3PctyhzsUDiUZQheHHSwqVJYpqi SlqRsTrcj3iGptWk2/AM5KAbFg8jOvzmYVaLJhSZUqs7TTf0SVdKrC6idyhHFhEK5uVy ZCUw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.183.194 with SMTP id q42mr1609320eem.130.1331541501944; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 01:38:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.31.133 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 01:38:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:38:21 +0400 Message-ID: From: Alexander Churanov To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: fiziologus@gmail.com, avg@freebsd.org, dev2@heesakkers.info, boost-ports , sem@freebsd.org, linimon@lonesome.com, martymac@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boost ports update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:38:30 -0000 Folks, I've fixed build for games/frogatto with Boost 1.48. http://alexanderchuranov.com/boost-port/games-frogatto-boost-148-2012-03-12_11-14.diff Alexander Churanov, maintainer of devel/boost-* From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 08:52:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CF11065670 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:52:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from andxor.it (relay.andxor.it [195.223.2.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73CF08FC16 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:52:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1732 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2012 08:45:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO alex.andxor.it) (192.168.2.30) by andxor.it with SMTP; 12 Mar 2012 08:45:59 -0000 Message-ID: <4F5DB7C7.6090308@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:45:59 +0100 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120221 Firefox/10.0.2 SeaMonkey/2.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mr Dandy References: <201203112026.30630.subbsd@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201203112026.30630.subbsd@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Svyatoslav Lempert , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PHP 5.4.0 : lang/php54 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:52:43 -0000 Mr Dandy wrote: > May be more correctly set PHP 5.4 by default to lang/php5, and repocopy > current lang/php5 into lang/php53? > > Probably current maintainer of php (@ale) has the plan ;) I've already created patches to update the current php5 port to 5.4. I'm waiting for fixes to other main php-related ports and the end of ports freeze to make them public and then commit them. I'm tired to listen at every PHP release that we should not update because everything broke (and on the other side people asking me when the port will be update, because it has incredible new features). Updating php port is a big task and will be done with the correct timing. Functions removed in php5.4 have been deprecated 10 year ago, if you still rely on them after more than 2 years PHP 5.3.0 has been released, then probably you should stick to lang/php52 port, or find a maintainer and a committer willing to create and maintain lang/php53. -- Alex Dupre From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 09:28:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC5C106566B for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:28:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF068FC0A for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:28:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S71YJ-00055c-Nd for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:28:27 -0700 Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:28:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1331544507726-5557072.post@n5.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: portaudit pubkey X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:28:28 -0000 What's up with portaudit? It's still (since first yesterday portaudit update) complaining about missing key. portaudit: Public key /usr/local/etc/portaudit.pubkey not found. => Please update your ports tree and try again. *** Error code 1 regards, - Jakub Lach -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/portaudit-pubkey-tp5557072p5557072.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 10:17:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6495106566B for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:17:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EEE58FC14 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:17:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2CAHBdb075905 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:17:11 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q2CAHBdb075905 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1331547432; bh=9nJcPaXLrMoBtGOq5ZuKB2JQSidnpoEBAvxA+flfvuM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:Content-Type: Message-ID:Mime-Version; b=qscb3+lZvuz40Mx+o5JH5b08hoYxRP+L8VxKeE+KyYGZSJA93Ch2xDwNskHqpw0zK FhJOWpLnxiXR1plGLF/Yj33IAVA1hBD/GbuiNN8x7IPckw+YXtIgRT3Zncdr7fz+Jz 3G1RaUsJSSd75xUKGkhDyqsPY+FH0guzJvg6zYNE= Message-ID: <4F5DCD20.4050707@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:17:04 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <1331544507726-5557072.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1331544507726-5557072.post@n5.nabble.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC113EEC5A1CBEED6608D34D3" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_ALL,DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: portaudit pubkey X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:17:17 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC113EEC5A1CBEED6608D34D3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/03/2012 09:28, Jakub Lach wrote: > What's up with portaudit? >=20 > It's still (since first yesterday portaudit update) complaining=20 > about missing key. >=20 > portaudit: Public key /usr/local/etc/portaudit.pubkey not found. > =3D> Please update your ports tree and try again. > *** Error code 1 Try portsnap or csup again. The key was added in a separate commit after the other changes, and it didn't propagate simultaneously with everything else. However, it had definitely propagated to servers near me by about 23:00UTC yesterday and I imagine that it's propagated everywhere in the hours since. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigC113EEC5A1CBEED6608D34D3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9dzSYACgkQ8Mjk52CukIy1qQCfYr4jBic7hOfMXPTaie7gqjGj vCYAn3mLBx3SmUUbZVtuH4QMrr7fu953 =4FZ2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC113EEC5A1CBEED6608D34D3-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 11:06:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8299E1065670 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:06:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700D08FC08 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2CB69PE071544 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:06:09 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2CB68RZ071541 for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:06:08 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:06:08 GMT Message-Id: <201203121106.q2CB68RZ071541@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: FreeBSD ports list Cc: Subject: Current unassigned ports problem reports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:06:09 -0000 (Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o ports/165949 lang/expect and astro/weather both install /usr/local/ o ports/165948 [MAINTAINER] editors/scite: update to 3.0.4 o ports/165946 [MAINTAINER] x11-toolkits/scintilla: update to 3.0.4 o ports/165938 sysutils/dvdisaster: Fix segfault/drive detection fail o ports/165933 [new port] lang/php54 o ports/165932 [MAINTAINER] audio/liquidsoap: update to 1.0.0 o ports/165926 [patch] deskutils/cairo-dock-plugins fix many bugs o ports/165925 [patch] deskutils/cairo-dock fix many bugs o ports/165919 building multimedia/xine-0.99.6_4 fails f ports/165918 unable to build net-mgmt/zenoss with subversion o ports/165912 [patch] x11/xcolorsel: fix build error with imake f ports/165911 update graphics/xfractint to patchlevel 12 o ports/165900 [new port] emulators/linux_base-c6 f ports/165899 devel/wand-libconfig and devel/libconfig conflict (sam f ports/165898 deskutils/cairo-dock-plugins 2.3.0~3_2 (The icon effec o ports/165865 New port: devel/pure-stllib: Deprecate pure-stldict & o ports/165864 [UPDATE] lang/pure to 0.52 o ports/165842 [maintainer-update] games/ioquake3 and slaves o ports/165799 utmpx fix for japanese/emacs-emcws o ports/165787 port/dvdisaster dumps core on RELENG_9/amd64 o ports/165708 New port: net-p2p/tahoe-lafs o ports/165706 print/ghostscript9 forces dependency of dns/libidn whi f ports/165678 Maintainer update: sysutils/desktop-installer o ports/165677 update of misc/freeswitch-scripts o ports/165676 Update of misc/freeswitch-pizzademo o ports/165675 Update of net/freeswitch-core f ports/165672 sysutils/bacula-server doesn't install all symlinks ne f ports/165659 [PATCH] net/nss-pam-ldapd: update to 0.8.6 o ports/165586 New port german/lx-office-erp, sql-ledger fork with ex o ports/165522 New port: sysutils/automount devd(8) based automounter o ports/165483 [patch] graphics/sane-backends creates a circular rcor o ports/165409 [UPDATE] www/MT: update to 5.13 o ports/165361 x11-wm/e17-module-mem counts memory incorrectly s ports/165353 ports-mgmt/portupgrade can't parse date anymore o ports/165337 new port: sysutils/fusefs-mp3fs Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C575B106564A; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:19:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241808FC08; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:19:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6FA28424; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:19:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (ip-86-49-61-235.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.61.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A59C828423; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:19:41 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F5DE9DC.8050005@quip.cz> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:19:40 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Dupre References: <201203112026.30630.subbsd@gmail.com> <4F5DB7C7.6090308@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F5DB7C7.6090308@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mr Dandy , Svyatoslav Lempert , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PHP 5.4.0 : lang/php54 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:19:44 -0000 Alex Dupre wrote: > Mr Dandy wrote: >> May be more correctly set PHP 5.4 by default to lang/php5, and repocopy >> current lang/php5 into lang/php53? >> >> Probably current maintainer of php (@ale) has the plan ;) > > I've already created patches to update the current php5 port to 5.4. I'm > waiting for fixes to other main php-related ports and the end of ports > freeze to make them public and then commit them. > I'm tired to listen at every PHP release that we should not update > because everything broke (and on the other side people asking me when > the port will be update, because it has incredible new features). > Updating php port is a big task and will be done with the correct > timing. Functions removed in php5.4 have been deprecated 10 year ago, if > you still rely on them after more than 2 years PHP 5.3.0 has been > released, then probably you should stick to lang/php52 port, or find a > maintainer and a committer willing to create and maintain lang/php53. I really understand that you don't have a time or will to maintain more than 1 version of PHP - it is not an easy task. But what is the difference between more versions of PHP in the ports tree and more versions of Python, Perl, MySQL, Postgresql, Postfix... and many more ports? There is always some reason why they are there. Some of them (Perl 5.8 comes to my mind) are/were in the tree for a long time after upstream EOL. Personally - I don't need older PHP versions for webaplications written by my-self, but there are many hosted websites depending on an older versions on our webhosting servers. Customers must wait for update from their vedors etc. Even some mainstream Open Source CMS and other applications lags behind PHP development. Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 13:31:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99F9106566B for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:31:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7938FC08 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghrr20 with SMTP id r20so3021849ghr.13 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 06:31:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=N+bL5exWMpjhB7qXqMJfuGjJwc0PIX8EL0+uOjGzcV8=; b=Ta7It87ajVpn2yTDtZsMdSbmsE0d1BEez2/sBNYcqg8oyuVp3jI3sa9O24SW3MUx6g nt3Iz63n9dHo4c+PpsQ9rGtxEgJEHdEzaADvvLsCey1xboQjz6OKMNL9xL4KKdr2X5cM TQSiGkr5fU730wKKcd+KY4WGHix9YD+hj6oAmiQZFoBieFaFdiB6ysskQDWFPTIWiG+a nJ1Uz70zKf9M2T8eQW1gSOgLbfSF2jNpZzmkEjvOZsDvs3vzLb5nJrcH1mUKO3bGkkAS 3NrgR7C11OGRz/8PJ0XeQ+WEnBLG1a6T5gMPRXDWtjFjo6oObk0KbIrV2DXsTVgPQuEh CEjw== Received: by 10.236.185.4 with SMTP id t4mr13558958yhm.129.1331559090064; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 06:31:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g21sm22738235ani.13.2012.03.12.06.31.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 06:31:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3V60TW2clfz2CG4t for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:31:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:31:26 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120312093126.4420939f@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4F5DE9DC.8050005@quip.cz> References: <201203112026.30630.subbsd@gmail.com> <4F5DB7C7.6090308@FreeBSD.org> <4F5DE9DC.8050005@quip.cz> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkicR2OGFeamuHrMEsQKK0Q13j4gAkKK+e8oPQv1hnnkGcOx70XT41m9PinqX6LE7CyWLZ/ Subject: Re: PHP 5.4.0 : lang/php54 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:31:37 -0000 On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:19:40 +0100 Miroslav Lachman articulated: > I really understand that you don't have a time or will to maintain > more than 1 version of PHP - it is not an easy task. But what is the > difference between more versions of PHP in the ports tree and more > versions of Python, Perl, MySQL, Postgresql, Postfix... and many more > ports? There is always some reason why they are there. > Some of them (Perl 5.8 comes to my mind) are/were in the tree for a > long time after upstream EOL. > > Personally - I don't need older PHP versions for webaplications > written by my-self, but there are many hosted websites depending on > an older versions on our webhosting servers. Customers must wait for > update from their vedors etc. Even some mainstream Open Source CMS > and other applications lags behind PHP development. The primary reason that so many older/EOL'd versions of programs are still in existence is because by nature most individuals are just plain lazy. Face it, man only invented electricity because watching TV by candle light was not very convenient. Seriously though, all too many users have to be dragged into the future or else they will just rot in the past. If support for EOL'd crap was implemented immediately, support for the newer versions would be instituted lickety-split. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 13:34:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA3D10656B7 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from endzed@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B118FC19 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wern13 with SMTP id n13so1794985wer.13 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 06:34:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=IDVQaKaKcFJklB5kV4XIKUQfgxH8PCBMMonz88tyUik=; b=D1tTn/l1SoRs8PonJOe0j4KyByESmJfsg67hnDNg1ZjQ4HLIAXh8ac+40MgayVsWSy qji6qidQE9VRS9sKMCVrZrsZJiuRqEitmMbWrGFxS7WrwuzGepGVHHgWglRsKByRjURY UecXG1BicL76IiqQ2l74uo2W1vroubbqJTdHU189X2+fftPdrQ1+8ZDHhr/yca9cElcX Vx10p+H5WVbr2ggLytw47gxl6kkavAdaXzlxpy9kSEaoU3esd6UEiwXPwn28liLQKnhQ uucKt3RaEwvhBLAASctD5RLP01hURxwADzDEGr6pgfLV+SOd5wrkqlx3M89yoB7niqDT d+Vw== Received: by 10.180.14.73 with SMTP id n9mr27342685wic.16.1331559248315; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 06:34:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (178-211-251-49.dhcp.sevj.net. [178.211.251.49]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id be4sm58172983wib.8.2012.03.12.06.34.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 06:34:06 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) From: endzed@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <4F5DB7C7.6090308@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:34:03 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5814CD2B-BDA0-4FA5-A85D-4ACED1B64869@gmail.com> References: <201203112026.30630.subbsd@gmail.com> <4F5DB7C7.6090308@FreeBSD.org> To: FreeBSD-Ports X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Subject: Re: PHP 5.4.0 : lang/php54 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:34:10 -0000 Le 12 mars 2012 =E0 09:45, Alex Dupre a =E9crit : > Mr Dandy wrote: >> May be more correctly set PHP 5.4 by default to lang/php5, and = repocopy=20 >> current lang/php5 into lang/php53?=20 >>=20 >> Probably current maintainer of php (@ale) has the plan ;) >=20 > I've already created patches to update the current php5 port to 5.4. = I'm > waiting for fixes to other main php-related ports and the end of ports > freeze to make them public and then commit them. > I'm tired to listen at every PHP release that we should not update > because everything broke (and on the other side people asking me when > the port will be update, because it has incredible new features). > Updating php port is a big task and will be done with the correct > timing. Functions removed in php5.4 have been deprecated 10 year ago, = if > you still rely on them after more than 2 years PHP 5.3.0 has been > released, then probably you should stick to lang/php52 port, or find a > maintainer and a committer willing to create and maintain lang/php53. As a small ISP/hosting company I understand very well both sides, since = we have boxes on which we will need to keep php52, and other boxes on = which we want to use php54 as soon as it will be ready in ports. But as others said, I think that the issue should be addressed the same = way as for i.e. python or perl, I mean one port per version lang/php52 = lang/php53 lang/php54 etc. and by consequence no lang/php port Why ? because this would be safer for users (no accidental version = upgrade), and easier to handle for admin. Imho I would even try to = separate completely php version and allow install of several versions in = parallel. Maybe this is harder to "insert" in ports tree - you know certainly = better that I - but some other ports could then set dependencies over = specific PHP version.=20 The point that you have no time to maintain more than one version at a = time is not a real problem btw, we all know the enormous/great work = you're doing on this since years, and I would not complain if from time = to time you say "I'm moving to new php version". Older versions will = then enter in "looking for new maintainer port" list and stay in port = tree until someone can take care of it, or until some security/age = stuffs push it in removed port list... My 2 cts. David, a happy user ;) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 13:38:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D02B106566B for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:38:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fwall@inotronic.de) Received: from mail.inotronic.de (mail.inotronic.de [77.73.248.111]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C8F8FC08 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phosphorus (mail [77.73.248.111]) by mail.inotronic.de (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2CDc51S058816 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:38:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fwall@inotronic.de) X-Filter-Status: scanned by inotronic CheckMAIL Received: from mail.inotronic.de ([77.73.248.111]) by phosphorus (phosphorus.dmz.inotronic.de [77.73.248.111]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id l5z0cHvnUpa3 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:38:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from boron.inotronic.de (boron.inotronic-intern.de [10.1.2.10]) by mail.inotronic.de (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2CDbl92058779 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:37:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fwall@inotronic.de) X-Receipient-To: Received: from pcfw2.inotronic-intern.de (pcfw2.inotronic-intern.de [10.1.2.235]) by boron.inotronic.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2CDbkw3075099; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:37:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fwall@inotronic.de) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:30:05 +0100 From: Frank Wall To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120312133004.GC22754@pcfw2.inotronic-intern.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Porting OpenVAS 5.0 (BETA) - Current state? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:38:07 -0000 Hi, is anyone working on porting OpenVAS 5 to FreeBSD or has anyone tried to do it in the past? Any known problems, caveats or linuxisms? I've seen some posts about a year ago regarding OpenVAS 4, but it seems nothing has happended since then. I would like to continue work on OpenVAS if someone has started a port but didn't finished it yet. Thanks for your feedback. - Frank From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 14:00:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C460B1065670 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:00:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EB118FC0C for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2012 14:00:42 -0000 Received: from hu5.abaxx.de (EHLO [10.6.25.100]) [213.61.170.110] by mail.gmx.net (mp070) with SMTP; 12 Mar 2012 15:00:42 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1956535 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/+ra4jcZb+jRHSqNbQNYruq/c0W8lYFlS+XuEoeD as3Mb4vaXK4EvP Message-ID: <4F5E018A.1070602@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:00:42 +0100 From: olli hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Frank Wall References: <20120312133004.GC22754@pcfw2.inotronic-intern.de> In-Reply-To: <20120312133004.GC22754@pcfw2.inotronic-intern.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Subject: Re: Porting OpenVAS 5.0 (BETA) - Current state? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:00:44 -0000 On 2012-03-12 14:30, Frank Wall wrote: > Hi, > > is anyone working on porting OpenVAS 5 to FreeBSD or has > anyone tried to do it in the past? Any known problems, > caveats or linuxisms? > > I've seen some posts about a year ago regarding OpenVAS 4, > but it seems nothing has happended since then. I would > like to continue work on OpenVAS if someone has started a > port but didn't finished it yet. > > > Thanks for your feedback. > I tried a to port OPenVAS 4 last year but give up because of to many linuxisms in the codebase. (special for detecting network settings, interfaces ...) I don't think this has changed meanwhile ... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 14:00:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBEC8106564A for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:00:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F1D8FC19 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:00:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A8F28426; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:00:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (ip-86-49-61-235.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.61.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BEFA528424; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:00:51 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F5E0192.8000301@quip.cz> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:00:50 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <201203112026.30630.subbsd@gmail.com> <4F5DB7C7.6090308@FreeBSD.org> <4F5DE9DC.8050005@quip.cz> <20120312093126.4420939f@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120312093126.4420939f@scorpio> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jerry Subject: Re: PHP 5.4.0 : lang/php54 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:00:54 -0000 Jerry wrote: > On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:19:40 +0100 > Miroslav Lachman articulated: > >> I really understand that you don't have a time or will to maintain >> more than 1 version of PHP - it is not an easy task. But what is the >> difference between more versions of PHP in the ports tree and more >> versions of Python, Perl, MySQL, Postgresql, Postfix... and many more >> ports? There is always some reason why they are there. >> Some of them (Perl 5.8 comes to my mind) are/were in the tree for a >> long time after upstream EOL. >> >> Personally - I don't need older PHP versions for webaplications >> written by my-self, but there are many hosted websites depending on >> an older versions on our webhosting servers. Customers must wait for >> update from their vedors etc. Even some mainstream Open Source CMS >> and other applications lags behind PHP development. > > The primary reason that so many older/EOL'd versions of programs are > still in existence is because by nature most individuals are just plain > lazy. Face it, man only invented electricity because watching TV by > candle light was not very convenient. > > Seriously though, all too many users have to be dragged into the future > or else they will just rot in the past. If support for EOL'd crap was > implemented immediately, support for the newer versions would be > instituted lickety-split. It is not about EoL in the first place. PHP 5.3 is still maintained branch by vendor. And if we are talking about more than one branch... FreeBSD exists in 3 parallel branches + HEAD. Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 14:36:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37CB3106566C for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:36:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from endzed@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92348FC0A for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:36:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wern13 with SMTP id n13so1889282wer.13 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:36:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=7fjuhYkwZKqZw7G1sBEdfWxmnQ/aRyWl6OWipx68TMI=; b=w4hfkGiD6dv2fa1VrV4FTzz3KT/syIFfQDUyYFHv+VnAwxLpjzNOptUwmogc9IQ7F0 v2gnwCQm79Mwf1Ivy5HshtoICQIsJCBgPds+9I/5vSoZejBD7ch2cc2WovjTmiHt07/e Q1FBOEY6JBiFcEM8y6yoqGqP12DnxUHC9biB98zyBDAoo4eSd0BeL6u/rq6curBvvfjD ryX+MYbeRLN7Kl3VT59JEULEvfFXlD1da+vxll61GiEXGo4uunbxHcS9I0scP5r1R0A4 9TDBfTmtulujZPUlrB0K07XE5kepO5QHnGHcmiLHXa48oVon2U4FoFc3bmy2R13316zU dmtA== Received: by 10.180.76.74 with SMTP id i10mr25465749wiw.2.1331563002686; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:36:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (178-211-251-49.dhcp.sevj.net. [178.211.251.49]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n8sm58809297wix.10.2012.03.12.07.36.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:36:41 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) From: endzed@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <4F5E0192.8000301@quip.cz> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:36:38 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1018A8F3-A4E6-468C-8097-E60349E121F5@gmail.com> References: <201203112026.30630.subbsd@gmail.com> <4F5DB7C7.6090308@FreeBSD.org> <4F5DE9DC.8050005@quip.cz> <20120312093126.4420939f@scorpio> <4F5E0192.8000301@quip.cz> To: FreeBSD-Ports X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Subject: Re: PHP 5.4.0 : lang/php54 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:36:44 -0000 Le 12 mars 2012 =E0 15:00, Miroslav Lachman a =E9crit : > Jerry wrote: >> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:19:40 +0100 >> Miroslav Lachman articulated: >>=20 >>> I really understand that you don't have a time or will to maintain >>> more than 1 version of PHP - it is not an easy task. But what is the >>> difference between more versions of PHP in the ports tree and more >>> versions of Python, Perl, MySQL, Postgresql, Postfix... and many = more >>> ports? There is always some reason why they are there. >>> Some of them (Perl 5.8 comes to my mind) are/were in the tree for a >>> long time after upstream EOL. >>>=20 >>> Personally - I don't need older PHP versions for webaplications >>> written by my-self, but there are many hosted websites depending on >>> an older versions on our webhosting servers. Customers must wait for >>> update from their vedors etc. Even some mainstream Open Source CMS >>> and other applications lags behind PHP development. >>=20 >> The primary reason that so many older/EOL'd versions of programs are >> still in existence is because by nature most individuals are just = plain >> lazy. Face it, man only invented electricity because watching TV by >> candle light was not very convenient. >>=20 >> Seriously though, all too many users have to be dragged into the = future >> or else they will just rot in the past. If support for EOL'd crap was >> implemented immediately, support for the newer versions would be >> instituted lickety-split. >=20 > It is not about EoL in the first place. PHP 5.3 is still maintained = branch by vendor. > And if we are talking about more than one branch... FreeBSD exists in = 3 parallel branches + HEAD. Plus this way of thinking does not let place for inertia of big = projects. Especially collaborative projects where you can have thousand = of developers btw. You cannot ask all projects/piece of code to be ready = to upgrade to new version at the same time, and I'm not speaking of = projects that involve many other technologies than PHP. Some projects = simply cannot follow the vendor versioning rate just because of inertia, = just to say. Maybe this could also be a way to go here at some point, I = cannot tell. Anyway I think that the steps of launching a new port/port usage/port = deprecation is necessary for this exact reason. The other way would be = to freeze all the tree from time to time (i.e. several months) and ask = projects maintainers/developers to stick to each freeze. FreeBSD system = do that, but in userland it is imho not possible due to the big amount = of ports available, dependencies, conflicts, etc. But as I said, this is only my point of view, we will conform to any = change since we have not enough ressources to handle or maintain a port = like PHP. For the moment, I can say that this is not a lazy task when = you have tens of servers to maintain, and this is why I started to post = in this thread... >=20 > Miroslav Lachman > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 15:59:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C67106564A for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:59:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fwall@inotronic.de) Received: from mail.inotronic.de (mail.inotronic.de [77.73.248.111]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433488FC0C for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:59:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phosphorus (mail [77.73.248.111]) by mail.inotronic.de (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2CFxa1U071440; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:59:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fwall@inotronic.de) X-Filter-Status: scanned by inotronic CheckMAIL Received: from mail.inotronic.de ([77.73.248.111]) by phosphorus (phosphorus.dmz.inotronic.de [77.73.248.111]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id fYg6KTE7WI3t; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:59:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from boron.inotronic.de (boron.inotronic-intern.de [10.1.2.10]) by mail.inotronic.de (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2CFxV8f071429 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:59:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fwall@inotronic.de) X-Receipient-To: Received: from pcfw2.inotronic-intern.de (pcfw2.inotronic-intern.de [10.1.2.235]) by boron.inotronic.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2CFxVJZ047134; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:59:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fwall@inotronic.de) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:51:49 +0100 From: Frank Wall To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120312155149.GE22754@pcfw2.inotronic-intern.de> References: <20120312133004.GC22754@pcfw2.inotronic-intern.de> <4F5E018A.1070602@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F5E018A.1070602@gmx.de> Organization: inotronic Computers GmbH User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: olli hauer Subject: Re: Porting OpenVAS 5.0 (BETA) - Current state? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:59:37 -0000 Hi olli, On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 03:00:42PM +0100, olli hauer wrote: > I tried a to port OPenVAS 4 last year but give up because > of to many linuxisms in the codebase. > (special for detecting network settings, interfaces ...) do you still have your partial work somewhere around? Every piece of porting effort would help. So in case you still have Makefiles, patches, etc. I would be interested. Thanks - Frank From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 16:59:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0181065670 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:59:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepo202.cox.net (eastrmfepo202.cox.net [68.230.241.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB378FC14 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:59:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo109.cox.net ([68.230.241.222]) by eastrmfepo202.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20120312165927.UINM1165.eastrmfepo202.cox.net@eastrmimpo109.cox.net> for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:59:27 -0400 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.84.176]) by eastrmimpo109.cox.net with bizsmtp id kgzS1i00b3oG0Ji02gzTLJ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:59:27 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A02020A.4F5E2B6F.008F,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=XApQh1NwS0kk9y5VQg1IQe/r8Q/VmA0LM7eT14yPc6s= c=1 sm=1 a=8-l7vjrPXwIA:10 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=qwmwShWo9LG1Fa0ONy89vg==:17 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=kFZIdiT98-kE3pfrMmIA:9 a=fCqyQ_TZduNGnahj3bwA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=qwmwShWo9LG1Fa0ONy89vg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2CGxQ4q082462 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:59:26 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:59:21 -0500 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20120312115921.360cda97@cox.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Is imake broken with current xorg? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:59:33 -0000 I'm seeing the following with any port that uses imake: imake -DUseInstalled -I/usr/local/lib/X11/config In file included from Imakefile.c:16: In file included from /usr/local/lib/X11/config/Imake.tmpl:109: /usr/local/lib/X11/config/FreeBSD.cf:451:35: error: '#' is not followed by a macro parameter #define IncludeMakefile(file) @@# dependencies are in .depend ^ In file included from Imakefile.c:16: In file included from /usr/local/lib/X11/config/Imake.tmpl:316: /usr/local/lib/X11/config/Imake.rules:1674:27: error: empty character constant for flag in ${MAKEFLAGS} ''; do \ @@\ ^ /usr/local/lib/X11/config/Imake.rules:1897:35: error: '#' is not followed by a macro parameter #define IncludeMakefile(file) @@# dependencies are in .depend ^ In file included from Imakefile.c:16: /usr/local/lib/X11/config/Imake.tmpl:2144:10: fatal error: ' X11 .rules' file not found #include ProjectRulesFile ^ /usr/local/lib/X11/config/Imake.tmpl:2142:35: note: expanded from: # define ProjectRulesFile Concat3(<,TopLevelProject,.rules>) ^ /usr/local/lib/X11/config/Imake.rules:256:23: note: expanded from: #define Concat3(a,b,c)a/**/b/**/c ^ 4 errors generated. imake: Exit code 1. Stop. Looks like imake doesn't play nice with our current xorg? -- Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 17:06:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47CEE106566C; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:06:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0480F8FC15; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S78Qb-00034R-OW; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:48:57 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S78Qb-00004a-Kg; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:48:57 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2CGmv7k018859; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:48:57 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2CGmvl0018858; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:48:57 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bris.ac.uk using -f Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:48:57 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: portmgr@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20120312164857.GA18845@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: pkg2ng duplicate file listing warnings X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:06:00 -0000 Running pkg2ng on r231193M ia64 gave these warnings: Registering CalculiX-2.4... pkg: duplicate file listing: /usr/local/share/doc/CalculiX/ccx/node580.tml, ignoring Registering binutils-2.22_1... pkg: lstat(/usr/local/bin/ld.gold): No such file or directory Registering docbook-4.4_2... pkg: duplicate directory listing: /usr/local/share/doc/docbook/4.4/, inoring Registering docbook-4.5_2... pkg: duplicate directory listing: /usr/local/share/doc/docbook/4.5/, inoring Registering font-bh-ttf-1.0.3... pkg: duplicate directory listing: /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/, inoring done. Registering font-misc-ethiopic-1.0.3... pkg: duplicate directory listing: /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TF/, ignoring pkg: duplicate directory listing: /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/OTF/, ignoring done. Registering font-misc-meltho-1.0.3... pkg: duplicate directory listing: /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/OT/, ignoring done. Registering openldap-sasl-client-2.4.26... pkg: duplicate directory listing: /usr/local/etc/openlda/, ignoring done. Registering pkg-config-0.25_1... pkg: duplicate directory listing: /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/, ignorng done. Shall I chase these up with the respective ports maintainters? Or are these false positives? Or perhaps bugs in pkgng? -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 17:19:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCFC106566C; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:19:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlaffaye.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F708FC1C; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:19:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eekd17 with SMTP id d17so1433244eek.13 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:19:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f7c9ndoEnSqodNbVAa6sMJFuuXB+Ioajhl1gMbcBwtU=; b=wXRWXcXtEsMBAIoNJv5u5gzB5F+g3QpYZy8kZczvfROWGojhedAWdUan2PrlXOQWBL VAKAHpGTTogodMukF9wf5aAzOckjAFTkL/yxAcxs98fU4C7xL7Mz3xOxKqK2vOd/f2x3 Sma3SkOj4lF4huF6eDGkrUxvUi0Xwsx80yAO1+18KTIvTU+CpK9tgX0ZwSJXMY4R6MiS uu1ndi14CyDHeFSZxB2ZW94rBa/OUJT+pNXbdmW7b01/9jG5IDtiuQqyX+wkEBPluO/L G3nzPhAD4gwJ8l26QVapcU/SiqUrV/ePViuBhYCnQ+31bHDKLdH11AkUg8QqUJrt01n4 oTJg== Received: by 10.213.6.211 with SMTP id a19mr520362eba.35.1331572752816; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.42.116.106] (proxy.ovh.net. [213.186.50.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h47sm51870040eea.10.2012.03.12.10.19.11 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:19:11 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Julien Laffaye Message-ID: <4F5E300E.5070402@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:19:10 +0100 From: Julien Laffaye User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anton Shterenlikht References: <20120312164857.GA18845@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20120312164857.GA18845@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: pkg2ng duplicate file listing warnings X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:19:14 -0000 On 03/12/2012 05:48 PM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Running pkg2ng on r231193M ia64 gave these warnings: > > Registering CalculiX-2.4... pkg: duplicate file listing: /usr/local/share/doc/CalculiX/ccx/node580.tml, ignoring > Registering binutils-2.22_1... pkg: lstat(/usr/local/bin/ld.gold): No such file or directory > Registering docbook-4.4_2... pkg: duplicate directory listing: /usr/local/share/doc/docbook/4.4/, inoring > Registering docbook-4.5_2... pkg: duplicate directory listing: /usr/local/share/doc/docbook/4.5/, inoring > Registering font-bh-ttf-1.0.3... pkg: duplicate directory listing: /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/, inoring > done. > Registering font-misc-ethiopic-1.0.3... pkg: duplicate directory listing: /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TF/, ignoring > pkg: duplicate directory listing: /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/OTF/, ignoring > done. > Registering font-misc-meltho-1.0.3... pkg: duplicate directory listing: /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/OT/, ignoring > done. > Registering openldap-sasl-client-2.4.26... pkg: duplicate directory listing: /usr/local/etc/openlda/, ignoring > done. > Registering pkg-config-0.25_1... pkg: duplicate directory listing: /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/, ignorng > done. > > > Shall I chase these up with the respective ports maintainters? Yes, pkgng is more strict :) > Or are these false positives? > Or perhaps bugs in pkgng? Well, they should not :p From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 18:06:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0FD106566B for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:06:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C908FC19 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:06:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S79di-0003Fy-8v for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:06:34 -0700 Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:06:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1331575594146-5558587.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <4F5DCD20.4050707@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <1331544507726-5557072.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F5DCD20.4050707@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portaudit pubkey X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:06:35 -0000 That would be too obvious, I've had fresh snapshots downloaded for several times since first and second commit, last one is from Mon Mar 12 18:46:26 CET I believe. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/portaudit-pubkey-tp5557072p5558587.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 18:37:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4331065670 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:37:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@theusgroup.com) Received: from theusgroup.com (theusgroup.com [64.122.243.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686988FC0A for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:37:49 +0000 (UTC) To: Jakub Lach In-reply-to: <1331544507726-5557072.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1331544507726-5557072.post@n5.nabble.com> Comments: In-reply-to Jakub Lach message dated "Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:28:27 -0700." Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:31:33 -0700 From: John Message-Id: <20120312183133.CE3D47E1@server.theusgroup.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portaudit pubkey X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:37:53 -0000 >What's up with portaudit? > >It's still (since first yesterday portaudit update) complaining >about missing key. > >portaudit: Public key /usr/local/etc/portaudit.pubkey not found. >=> Please update your ports tree and try again. >*** Error code 1 I ran into this same problem on the first machine I upgraded which occured between the 2 commits. Even after deleting everything in ports-mgmt/portaudit and doing a new csup with the second commit I was still getting the above error. I ended up manually copying the pubkey to /usr/local/etc and then had to delete /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz John Theus TheUs Group TheUsGroup.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 18:40:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A841065670 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:40:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6B08FC0C for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:40:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2CIe487084276 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:40:04 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q2CIe487084276 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q2CIe487084276; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none Message-ID: <4F5E42F9.809@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:39:53 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <1331544507726-5557072.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F5DCD20.4050707@infracaninophile.co.uk> <1331575594146-5558587.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1331575594146-5558587.post@n5.nabble.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig562D21344D9ED46FF688DF41" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Subject: Re: portaudit pubkey X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:40:09 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig562D21344D9ED46FF688DF41 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/03/2012 18:06, Jakub Lach wrote: > That would be too obvious, I've had fresh > snapshots downloaded for several times > since first and second commit, last one > is from Mon Mar 12 18:46:26 CET I believe. Well, I managed to get all the latest portaudit bits last night including the pubkey both through portsnap and through csup (on different systems.) If you're using csup, perhaps try another server? Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig562D21344D9ED46FF688DF41 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9eQwMACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxcywCdHDlKFnDqHV33I4oPpEVEZH+t oWAAn0tV4N74dlnW7wznLV1TfXqoWS/6 =FxkZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig562D21344D9ED46FF688DF41-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 18:54:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFDA106566C for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:54:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE418FC0A for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:54:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S7AOH-0001Na-77 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:54:41 -0700 Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:54:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1331578481212-5558739.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <4F5E42F9.809@FreeBSD.org> References: <1331544507726-5557072.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F5DCD20.4050707@infracaninophile.co.uk> <1331575594146-5558587.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F5E42F9.809@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portaudit pubkey X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:54:41 -0000 Thanks for such attention. I'm using portsnap with main portsnap server. > Even after deleting everything in ports-mgmt/portaudit > and doing a new csup with the second commit I was > still getting the above error. Exactly. Now, since I've finally found pubkey (I was looking in wrong places, and yesterday google's 0 hits with "portaudit.pubkey" didn't help either), I have a feeling that my problem is over, thanks for help. best regards, - Jakub Lach -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/portaudit-pubkey-tp5557072p5558739.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 21:17:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB5A106564A for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:17:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74B848FC19 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:17:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2012 21:17:35 -0000 Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.0.100]) [87.139.233.65] by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 12 Mar 2012 22:17:35 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1956535 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/KYH0L2ifKWAtbrm5MVJwRAe6Wrge76lQx9n/gkF SD9JSiWXdgmc7h Message-ID: <4F5E67EF.7090302@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:17:35 +0100 From: olli hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20120312133004.GC22754@pcfw2.inotronic-intern.de> <4F5E018A.1070602@gmx.de> <20120312155149.GE22754@pcfw2.inotronic-intern.de> In-Reply-To: <20120312155149.GE22754@pcfw2.inotronic-intern.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Frank Wall Subject: Re: Porting OpenVAS 5.0 (BETA) - Current state? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:17:44 -0000 On 2012-03-12 16:51, Frank Wall wrote: > Hi olli, > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 03:00:42PM +0100, olli hauer wrote: >> I tried a to port OPenVAS 4 last year but give up because >> of to many linuxisms in the codebase. >> (special for detecting network settings, interfaces ...) > > do you still have your partial work somewhere around? > Every piece of porting effort would help. So in case you > still have Makefiles, patches, etc. I would be interested. > Hi Frank, unfortunately not on my actual machine, but I will look if I have them in some old backups. -- Regards, olli From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 23:15:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB511065672 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:15:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9E78FC0A for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhq7 with SMTP id hq7so3704489wib.13 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:15:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=fAfR5BckuS9eJ2sMPhAhSZUgjXyYOOGNyXPrtLbqO9o=; b=mQnXPZpD4mk3fKvEAzMOpfqIZrM2D/rO10LuexY2ZM2+XunKFQph3JBv1Aws1xSzqI qchSx9LRp5SYRELtzMdu5poqZpT0dwPpR28gd5iVUwAHHHgECE8P0tcWc4xTUIiSYbgC TzmknlL+j5lZfwKMAJiqRiJhdm4Pg7Utla+vhLIYzdzgSXXx8N8StYW9Aj+Ek62Out62 pZuFxyaR82HVoW/sgvhFJtkLyNIwH6sR+DRjt0MH+8oYFtoQSOpPLA+/iQcSfNMPFoUc fpHgL0jmQUJL6LJt4xskxNmtlGPSUutFgo1y0INLLs3jGSy56Z9fAlafU5zRtkpSkRNm iAbw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.134.27 with SMTP id r27mr8277278wei.107.1331594130579; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:15:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.143.3 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:15:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1331578481212-5558739.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1331544507726-5557072.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F5DCD20.4050707@infracaninophile.co.uk> <1331575594146-5558587.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F5E42F9.809@FreeBSD.org> <1331578481212-5558739.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:15:30 -0800 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: Jakub Lach Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portaudit pubkey X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:15:32 -0000 On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Jakub Lach wrote: > Thanks for such attention. > > I'm using portsnap with main portsnap server. > >> Even after deleting everything in ports-mgmt/portaudit >> and doing a new csup with the second commit I was >> still getting the above error. > > Exactly. Now, since I've finally found pubkey (I was > looking in wrong places, and yesterday google's 0 hits > with "portaudit.pubkey" didn't help either), I have a > feeling that my problem is over, thanks for help. The easy fix is just 'portaudit -F'. then everything went fine on all of my systems. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 23:25:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6544106566B for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:25:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6F18FC0A for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S7Eck-0007wk-1N for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:25:54 -0700 Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:25:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1331594754036-5559419.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1331544507726-5557072.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F5DCD20.4050707@infracaninophile.co.uk> <1331575594146-5558587.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F5E42F9.809@FreeBSD.org> <1331578481212-5558739.post@n5.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portaudit pubkey X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:25:54 -0000 If I recall correctly 'portaudit -Fa' didn't change anything for me, and some attempt at updating of portaudit bombed after portaudit have been already deleted, so without pubkey I couldn't install portaudit again. But I may be wrong, I haven't exactly paid attention from the beginning.. best regards, - Jakub Lach -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/portaudit-pubkey-tp5557072p5559419.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 23:35:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8511106566C for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:35:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 628268FC12 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wern13 with SMTP id n13so2567940wer.13 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:35:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3b1eKbcqJYl68Nda5+pYDwaMi2Yf3EwP9yyxTJB2vJY=; b=zf/48Bj7o1yMVsuipwrh/C3xYzvt0ZTKGqrRc+WXD606rhgtzxh36pZEjoEk/kiGlH qyj4LqKbJbMZi9NxZytWQ7fYP4snUke+5KpK0ikfMg8u4XPlwgwI84K50O0KqA3P1vs6 UUDUAndETHNPewhg/pqj7+1YdeuLCyvLM8UP0art0HCsTj2YmrAmfK+MZHhMW6YNzaDU xiup1QeT8+Ne8xYOeq/a9XbgMQUApYc6wabWllAToNk/S4PwwhRmTZ/fCz2DSEG3ojKd byYfOx9ou0RiMaM9BJZEMJ590xQWQ6UOojnHCyHu+QCtjMl+7n4BnZKgc4TqKJhHHk3x Bqhw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.78.233 with SMTP id e9mr2125971wix.0.1331595318493; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:35:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.143.3 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:35:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1331594754036-5559419.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1331544507726-5557072.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F5DCD20.4050707@infracaninophile.co.uk> <1331575594146-5558587.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F5E42F9.809@FreeBSD.org> <1331578481212-5558739.post@n5.nabble.com> <1331594754036-5559419.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:35:18 -0800 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: Jakub Lach Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portaudit pubkey X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:35:25 -0000 On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Jakub Lach wrote: > If I recall correctly 'portaudit -Fa' didn't > change anything for me, and some attempt > at updating of portaudit bombed after > portaudit have been already deleted, so > without pubkey I couldn't install portaudit > again. > > But I may be wrong, I haven't exactly > paid attention from the beginning.. While I didn't think it relevant, maybe it is significant that I always did 'portmaster portaudit and THEN did ' portaudit -F' and re-ran portmaster. I don't know if portmaster vs. portupdate is relevant, either. Oddly, if I updated multiple ports (portmaster portaudit ImageMagick), the last port, regardless of what it was, reported this error. Of course, ports updated before portaudit worked, but if portaudit was the last port to be updated, it failed. If I updated ImageMagick AFTER portaudit, portaudit succeeded and ImageMagick failed. But, in either case 'portaudit -F' allowed the remaining port(s) to build and install normally. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 13 01:30:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36734106566B; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:30:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35A48FC1A; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:30:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so50128iah.13 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:30:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4XChDJY1UtVaPggHwOf7pGaOTC4WsnW7Eog7YlTK3EE=; b=0F7hWwa/9LVCesv9o1yu7YmioiJYVZwTB5xbh1T5hYCV/WAk8Blp2r7oF+EkiWcBX6 AsLi9mVZ2GFKpQ7lWDRWIiK7EkPuvqOrpNC0jy5sT0+/Ka/OhG4XkyXAZqUOD4OrnXs0 zex1MwNlRfXWRWBnU7DFRdkgkF/9W3IwHiPrmyLVtJgIT0OQcR9saPH4GDC/TcEb3Pcy YqfMhzE6HF1ypfsYuVhUNyoIz6ViySY5TIx8A/5jtBR0Br6ERr9giXuhctEhYhMVVxbL s5OOybKc3WvjCb2q8fJMxm/MVNIiReqwQvRR9UvvetuhNVMMWcIA/oCZo430/nYcla0f PcnQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.154.130 with SMTP id vo2mr1533947igb.34.1331602225437; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:30:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.217.202 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:30:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F572D7E.40404@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120304121947.GC1250@kloomba> <4F54826C.7070701@FreeBSD.org> <20120307050004.GA2988@fsol> <4F572D7E.40404@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:30:25 -0500 Message-ID: From: Jeremy Messenger To: Alex Dupre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Roman Bogorodskiy Subject: Re: libtool question again X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:30:26 -0000 On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Alex Dupre wrote: > Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: >>> USE_AUTOTOOLS=3D =A0 =A0 =A0 libtool >>> USE_GNOME=3D =A0 ltverhack >>> >>> to avoid bumping. >> >> I'm using it and it doesn't help: libgnutls.so.47 becomes >> libgnutls.so.48 (where 48 is 'current'). > > Probably you have not set LIBTOOLFILES to include all the 'configure' > scripts. Yep, that's correct. The gnutls has more than one configure, so its Makefile will need to set it to this: LIBTOOLFILES=3D configure lib/configure libextra/configure Cheers, Mezz > In any case, a bump will be necessary, because the shared version number > will decrease, but at least it won't be necessary next times. > > -- > Alex Dupre --=20 mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 13 07:18:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1134106564A; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 07:18:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexanderchuranov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC70B8FC15; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 07:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eekd17 with SMTP id d17so44838eek.13 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:17:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9B3+NiDRwWkjVM4vIGfYDp4Nk8OVapoNP6UUyCjFhOA=; b=q/klFb029+xWJusNel1IrBD7rBJFniWWOXky8oxO7VOLy/LsPmzXQpK96qbsilalOD 8OLTB44Na+RWpVdS7Oj9yZZ4FmB7hzqSgiiFUhEEcPZpnXtrESir0a0ZnJRk5WTyWxt6 toUjVcZCwgOG1xUI3y4WLLTMl+ZsgKhRe8wYFuF2gEMq7lDLbzCLNRLjkHmMtAMsLDdI pdPGMa8itOKlwYRbZylxbPdjkHz62GZ4AvpfVj1Q1tFBeBKErzO6T+vEPj0XYkElrAQn 1/B0CivK/+YVlnUiuPWNH3v+s+HXeQ1QFyNF0flITglg6rPEnciVcvHeJqbNJOedAXXy UISw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.206.129 with SMTP id l1mr2161825eeo.67.1331623078579; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:17:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.31.133 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:17:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:17:58 +0400 Message-ID: From: Alexander Churanov To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: fiziologus@gmail.com, avg@freebsd.org, dev2@heesakkers.info, boost-ports , sem@freebsd.org, linimon@lonesome.com, martymac@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boost ports update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 07:18:00 -0000 Folks, There is good news: editors/koffice-kde4 builds successfully with Boost 1.48. It was failing in my tests because of conflict with qt33. The only dependent port left that fails after update to 1.48 is deskutils/kdepim4. For others we either have fixes or a plan how to cope with failures. I am going to find out what makes kdepim4 fail, then fix Boost for amd64 and submit an updated patch after that. Alexander Churanov, maintainer of devel/boost-* From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 13 10:00:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C3B1065716; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fabiodive@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835608FC18; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl9 with SMTP id l9so412526yen.13 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 03:00:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=FC7GgHHWWW5RjWPgzDiWE6s1K8xb2NOsjCflx2Q4qcU=; b=gvs/wPpLDqbfbB7FlBR0Bhe3CJIEvy7y5utbl7AY1qMAFXkaCuwR9blssRidv7JYgD FC8+iUJKjey38SQkHCMUy1GMea59sKVNkZKBSXS0IwjOseRaviN2/4FbKCL9jifSn+1g DZvQkEmF2RgILpX4HNJZ10gfckfGM0j3YOG4J8qPu6YK3omAYGBqjXOHz0on0I/+HtnI V+sItvD3iS1WzsDPjQnKHpoKHL3VCrmM0VCSNHP7Z5bEYznVNgHlwJbkOVkDgE6Q/8RP zBOlE6aMxTJb84zJSd/4lkTaheFYs75BUn7DJGmukAFtWsu62Pux9CUYrwQtTNsWjAcE JL2Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.207.70 with SMTP id fx6mr11658654qab.79.1331632813901; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 03:00:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.163.204 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 03:00:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:00:13 +0000 Message-ID: From: Fabio Dive To: clsung@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: py27-pyramid-1.2_1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:00:14 -0000 Hello, I am Fabio.. I am a proudly pyramid python user and BSD admin since some time, I would like to help you to prepare the port of the last version and maybe give a look further to see if we need to port some other related packages as well. Thank you Fabio Balzano From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 13 11:19:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D08D106566C; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:19:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from makc@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.issp.ac.ru (mail.issp.ac.ru [77.236.34.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978AA8FC18; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:19:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mercury.ph.man.ac.uk [130.88.75.175:17365] (HELO/EHLO mercury.ph.man.ac.uk, authenticated with LOGIN) by mail.issp.ac.ru with ESMTP/inet id q2DBJmjL070147 (using TLSv1/SSLv3, with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits), verified NO) Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:19:49 +0400 (MSK) From: Max Brazhnikov To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Alberto Villa Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:20:30 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-STABLE; KDE/4.8.1; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201203131120.30727.makc@freebsd.org> Cc: linimon@lonesome.com, Alexander Churanov Subject: Re: Boost ports update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:19:47 -0000 On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:17:58 +0400, Alexander Churanov wrote: > Folks, > > There is good news: editors/koffice-kde4 builds successfully with Boost 1.48. > It was failing in my tests because of conflict with qt33. > > The only dependent port left that fails after update to 1.48 is > deskutils/kdepim4. What's the problem with kdepim4? I've started test build with boost 1.48 on my tinderbox, but it will take some time to rebuild ports. > For others we either have fixes or a plan how to > cope with failures. > > I am going to find out what makes kdepim4 fail, then fix Boost for > amd64 and submit an updated patch after that. > > Alexander Churanov, > maintainer of devel/boost-* From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 13 14:13:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FE1106564A for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:13:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (dns1.vizion2000.net [62.49.197.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA52B8FC14 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:13:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix, from userid 1004) id BE970119C26; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 06:01:52 -0700 (PDT) From: David Southwell Organization: Vizion Communications To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 06:01:52 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-RELEASE; KDE/4.7.3; amd64; ; ) X-KMail-Markup: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201203130601.52466.admin@vizion2000.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: qpopper compile failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: david@vizion2000.net List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:13:52 -0000 qpopper has been working fine (amd64 running postfix) but on portupgrade I am Getting the following error: set MISSING_OBJS to base64.o set MISSING_SRCS to base64.c Set AR_FLAG = -r ; RANLIB_CMD = checking for sendmail program... ERROR: The sendmail program cannot be located ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. sendmail is [root@dns1 /usr/ports/mail/qpopper]# whereis sendmail sendmail: /usr/local/sbin/sendmail /usr/local/man/man1/sendmail.1.gz /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail qpopper config log includes the following lines: PATH: /usr/local/kde4/bin PATH: /sbin PATH: /bin PATH: /usr/sbin PATH: /usr/bin PATH: /usr/games PATH: /usr/local/sbin PATH: /usr/local/share/lprof PATH: /usr/local/bin PATH: /home/admin/bin Does anyone have any idea why this error might occur? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 13 14:23:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B44106566B for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:23:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832FD8FC17 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2DENiOA024068 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:23:44 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q2DENiOA024068 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1331648624; bh=xM8Vsg8z4Ah+48TrwD60x5tSLTK96/sKfAmy1WEBzV8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:Content-Type: Message-ID:Mime-Version; b=IWCHqxiq/I0wMEhCOtH9OW6ZUkdeZS89D4HUrR33WDS+qIiMjlKXEHFVBez/LPBgv nyppkDiUNTJzLa6sR5bViGTdwb55z1rv7LB3hBvlvSfn6NtQhuTx6+JNHcTGLBNfYn T7lKX504jaf1aCjii04NMjRkzoOWTZrXKw6F0Yjk= Message-ID: <4F5F5869.3010607@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:23:37 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <201203130601.52466.admin@vizion2000.net> In-Reply-To: <201203130601.52466.admin@vizion2000.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5D32B3AC6E184E425399A9A6" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_ALL,DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: qpopper compile failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:23:49 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5D32B3AC6E184E425399A9A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 13/03/2012 13:01, David Southwell wrote: > qpopper has been working fine (amd64 running postfix) but on portupgrad= e I am > Getting the following error: >=20 > set MISSING_OBJS to base64.o=20 > set MISSING_SRCS to base64.c=20 > Set AR_FLAG =3D -r ; RANLIB_CMD =3D=20 > checking for sendmail program... ERROR: The sendmail program cannot be = located > =3D=3D=3D> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. >=20 >=20 > sendmail is=20 > [root@dns1 /usr/ports/mail/qpopper]# whereis sendmail=20 > sendmail: /usr/local/sbin/sendmail /usr/local/man/man1/sendmail.1.gz=20 > /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail >=20 > qpopper config log includes the following lines: >=20 >=20 >=20 > PATH: /usr/local/kde4/bin > PATH: /sbin > PATH: /bin > PATH: /usr/sbin > PATH: /usr/bin > PATH: /usr/games > PATH: /usr/local/sbin > PATH: /usr/local/share/lprof > PATH: /usr/local/bin > PATH: /home/admin/bin >=20 > Does anyone have any idea why this error might occur? Yes. All unix apps that send e-mail expect to do it by piping the mail into /usr/sbin/sendmail. Despite the name, on FreeBSD that is not actually sendmail-brand sendmail, but mailwrapper(8) -- a handy program that redirects that piped input into the MTA of your choice. (sendmail q.v. is actually in /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail) Restore /usr/sbin/sendmail and verify that the contents of /etc/mail/mailer.conf are sane, and qpopper should spring into life again= =2E Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig5D32B3AC6E184E425399A9A6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9fWHAACgkQ8Mjk52CukIziFACcCP1wicar1LdUdnDTuV+m9dnI LSkAn1nCy/oUpRIC63mgtubZLWSVWNxM =HD5m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5D32B3AC6E184E425399A9A6-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 13 16:59:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB179106566C; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:59:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from makc@issp.ac.ru) Received: from mail.issp.ac.ru (mail.issp.ac.ru [77.236.34.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9558FC12; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:59:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mercury.ph.man.ac.uk [130.88.75.175:53573] (HELO/EHLO mercury.ph.man.ac.uk, authenticated with LOGIN) by mail.issp.ac.ru with ESMTP/inet id q2DGxrJj094506 (using TLSv1/SSLv3, with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits), verified NO) Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:59:54 +0400 (MSK) From: Max Brazhnikov To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:00:35 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-STABLE; KDE/4.8.1; amd64; ; ) References: <201203131120.30727.makc@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201203131120.30727.makc@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201203131700.36175.makc@issp.ac.ru> Cc: Alberto Villa , linimon@lonesome.com, Alexander Churanov Subject: Re: Boost ports update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:59:55 -0000 On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:20:30 +0000, Max Brazhnikov wrote: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:17:58 +0400, Alexander Churanov wrote: > > Folks, > > > > There is good news: editors/koffice-kde4 builds successfully with Boost 1.48. > > It was failing in my tests because of conflict with qt33. > > > > The only dependent port left that fails after update to 1.48 is > > deskutils/kdepim4. > What's the problem with kdepim4? I've started test build with boost 1.48 on my tinderbox, but it will take some time to rebuild ports. Well, the build have just finished, no problem with kdepim. Max From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 13 21:59:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30D9106564A; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexus@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D9F8FC0C; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wern13 with SMTP id n13so1383350wer.13 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:59:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=aH5AyX0L1lz7fKUATvSvaHjhrCvWOWCiIew2vrdW2yA=; b=og3Cvv8vQnUl2KCpF+uoQVV9tqJ3bS75zsr0+m8NQQFbRYD518SKwaWkn6NImURKHs b7ZJXxcvCCezG4NiQ2SwwIi8f/MjlehN6/jL+IVM55J/grm12Rd/Du0dFQrQ700p53X2 aoYt9OuyXe4QpVYA/3NQyq3D8q76y3Arch41E6Vuzg1iWXPBKSSPxqeogjGq8EFMeCGS 3Mn0KvaTHVz1IH4U9yWn74WrJSnK40qlIUBXnEmNH9zToEELxM5nqaOgaLJF9sSV/FGu ipzNIuOs2HBt0rJoiHFF8cgJH3JDLuK0lLFzQ0VLHMYAJQjVNlQOdfYCuAMtqrPYFgBj 8qCw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.104.65 with SMTP id gc1mr475884wib.13.1331675974004; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:59:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.11.7 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:59:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:59:33 -0400 Message-ID: From: alexus To: apache@FreeBSD.org, ale@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: apache-2.4.X & php5-5.4.X X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:59:36 -0000 Hello, sorry if I'm jumping the gun, but as you probably already know Apache httpd 2.4 released yet no updates at or at least I didn't find any at: http://wiki.freebsd.org/bsd.apache.mk in terms of when package/port would be created slightly off topic yet still _VERY_ important peace and _VERY_ widely used is mod_php. I know that was discussed about million times through mailing lists and other ways but, many would agree that mod_php is so widely used it should be incorporated into a separate package by itself and while we're on this topic new php-fpm should also be available through a package installed rather then ports. I understand that goal can be reached through /usr/ports but for one reason or another that may not be an option for someone and as I mention before I'd say majority of FreeBSD's web servers are using it and only minor amount of servers are not using it, so why is FreeBSD targeting minority vs majority? http://alexus.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 13 22:11:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5083C1065676; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:11:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28378FC0A; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:11:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl9 with SMTP id l9so1376193yen.13 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:11:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=XZF4DVlGTKmbNse0PlfTkGYfWmhDmV+mpv4TR7cKSZc=; b=NzA7TR7bI4uQhT0ab1qbmovAsnmw+QME+M00ntnIzdKnKoDQyFFeDOagUoTaNNUwiG +qma5H/mGZ7s/KNmx+jgZilBnOIM4aCkWLF4tVOx0rbhqqpFbnqULoBOeFUHaZb0lU6f vwG2ujzXdlsy1No6488P/AmZ8Xi4Kdha5csoas25Wr4NPdZFIzREMIgkq0b0wm90v+Pm 6jNNov6ONrZ3AhF1CYXTURHU63lwuChQND1thI0ObrWS2ZNZIGzud+RsdyUkPsCYjsF7 61uTQoIt6oRWyNx0uZhYBPHLbjXXej2GuIVy6weUb38yO+I1gbbkqI2zk//C+7Nh0jOQ uH9Q== Received: by 10.224.179.78 with SMTP id bp14mr669934qab.6.1331676713098; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:11:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from philip.hq.rws (wsip-174-79-184-239.dc.dc.cox.net. [174.79.184.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o8sm5629270qan.11.2012.03.13.15.11.51 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:11:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F5FC624.10006@p6m7g8.com> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:11:48 +0000 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6M7G8 Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111029 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: alexus References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC8D88896D0B24889D0DCD357" Cc: ports@freebsd.org, apache@freebsd.org, ale@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: apache-2.4.X & php5-5.4.X X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:11:54 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC8D88896D0B24889D0DCD357 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/13/12 21:59, alexus wrote: > sorry if I'm jumping the gun, but as you probably already know Apache > httpd 2.4 released yet no updates at or at least I didn't find any at: > http://wiki.freebsd.org/bsd.apache.mk in terms of when package/port > would be created Largely mine and ohaurer's schedule. The biggie is that it is *not* a repo copy so that files/ starts out empty of local patches unless we upstream them. Hopefully we can do it after the 8.3 freeze+slush --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Director Operations, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. --------------enigC8D88896D0B24889D0DCD357 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFPX8YmdbiP+9ubjBwRAmRIAJ9Nyamn6UAccME2r8/Q2ivivxhpQwCeLWOD eYMG1md0ps2NDM6Fun9f51A= =IXEK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC8D88896D0B24889D0DCD357-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 01:41:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93631106564A; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 01:41:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexus@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928AE8FC14; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 01:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wern13 with SMTP id n13so1542545wer.13 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:41:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ct9e8UNFA7emHXTFtpNmX69ZlebJ5B6U7zgjH/4kLq0=; b=DVZBDku05/8/CpAkDa3izJ+yKbpygwaZDzUqBqQPQt+GlOFtPJAxFc6chUjQwyNZKn T7gxIZhEhF9h4wE8iuGVf2IHs9AVT+nCc8E2flYTcfQIg1Lwim1sG7Je0PPHBOp1qjhC f+sRrME+xSI96YtwwRr0qltvUs2FGRKfeLI8ovNsL6W0StzRl1xSgEdUmkchJzK+7Qak mK0TClilK964iSmeM3ao/WhEwZw/BTJ/e/QnIUha9OYREwRyN5t84dgo+YpNFdqDl/p4 JAIT/yMf4kA+eWD/iYOdUG0AtflpfG+Fpr8aexELqn1vInslAX0RsPZksqCgfhSXg86X d32w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.135.106 with SMTP id t84mr392287wei.74.1331689295430; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:41:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.11.7 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:41:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F5FC624.10006@p6m7g8.com> References: <4F5FC624.10006@p6m7g8.com> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:41:35 -0400 Message-ID: From: alexus To: "Philip M. Gollucci" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ports@freebsd.org, apache@freebsd.org, ale@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: apache-2.4.X & php5-5.4.X X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 01:41:42 -0000 .. on behalf of a lot of FreeBSD users I'd like to thank you for your time and effort that you put into this project (a lot of us really appreciate that ;)) one more time outline the so called "requirements": 1) apache24 2) mod_php - *stand alone packages* (not just port (which already available= )). 3) php-fpm (comes w/ 5.4.0RC2) - also a stand alone package (not just port (which is also already available)) thank you so much again :) On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Philip M. Gollucci w= rote: > On 03/13/12 21:59, alexus wrote: >> sorry if I'm jumping the gun, but as you probably already know Apache >> httpd 2.4 released yet no updates at or at least I didn't find any at: >> http://wiki.freebsd.org/bsd.apache.mk in terms of when package/port >> would be created > Largely mine and ohaurer's schedule. =C2=A0The biggie is that it is *not*= a > repo copy so that files/ starts out empty of local patches unless we > upstream them. > > Hopefully we can do it after the 8.3 freeze+slush > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 =C2=A03F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C > Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 > Member, =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Apache Software Foundation > Committer, =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0FreeBSD Foundation > Consultant, =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 P6M7G8 Inc. > Director Operations, =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Ride= charge Inc. > > Work like you don't need the money, > love like you'll never get hurt, > and dance like nobody's watching. > --=20 http://alexus.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 05:54:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27AD2106566B for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 05:54:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from IrishDayLove@telia.com) Received: from 108-166-93-10.static.cloud-ips.com (108-166-93-10.static.cloud-ips.com [108.166.93.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49F18FC0A for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 05:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 05:45:36 +0000 From: =?UTF-8?Q?IrishDay=20Love?= To: ports Message-ID: <20120314$407f6a5d$1f39cc6$sxm@108-166-93-10.static.cloud-ips.com> X-Message-ID: 20120314$407f6a5d$1f39cc6$sxm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Receive Fantastic Love at IrishDay Discounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 05:54:46 -0000 If you can not display pic, [1]=09click here [2]3D=22UjivUIpkYgE8IsEYRYFmP3MtCQVxQ4p= [3]3D=22tU1oKNODELGLmGH3ZqaqZY3fUH=22 <= /td> [4]3D=22TY6OpQ7UPVGMVVktKmsT=22 [5]3D=22IcyM0NT6pMQgZPJZTAeqtmb0=22 [6]3D=22S9K9EATbvrhOyoa4oXKfutxv4OGz5EI= [7]3D=22pJ1ZgeePQLEieHL9d2zoW8A68BIQgFE= [8]3D=221yTX5KARHbuM8rRn=22 [9]3D=22kmO1vIH1YmIOWi9ypSqxoe6Z8ZFwVTk= [10]3D=22m8y4blQmY8AgHdVzOARTkAy5VImDml3= [11]3D=22O9rqkdY8qHGrDnzcz=22 [12]3D=220oXfOKZgonQeZUqvy9ql5nc=22 [13]3D=22FW89cfYkGMSXlo9UV7i=22 [14]3D=22R5Mu4nUnj082141jp4JcSrUm=22 [15]3D=22R6X8w79VCuGPjQze8kA0q2qXTK=22 = [16]3D=22yFwrDCbGvaGURxALXZ4cFrWU43uG6f= [17]3D=223F2PlfVXVoqBDdol9qZH1XZ=22 [18]3D=22Jb8OqvyZWNwkWb3BZZcp7SP5fw=22 = [19]3D=22ucMA7LDRlEp2W5Sl6ErACxW4sAWj5= [20]3D=22awGIsPF7H07xd8h5op=22 [21]3D=229mAz0JwUKRWgvw21O9ITL592p8yttR= [22]3D=222sKs1jbEgbgNGtHXtXNgHNivXQGvRh= [23]3D=22XqhPQNLgPnQBZGaboTMxe4ux5zi8Vz= [24]3D=228vWcbBTWRmiIGSoI=22 [25]3D=22DEycQ1y3ujVZxJFyGQAkTSj3vzUTFH= [26]3D=22SHOvThBM4IkPjbL2NJI8T4aO65Zawu= [27]3D=22zzIrvanPj6xxuo2B4Te3UVpGDti84R= [28]3D=22RTyc3gVbVUS28jcQYjIMPZ=22 [29]3D=22hmji0oOpkKTVEdamWvT1xsjcxJ2PCP= [30]3D=2278qtm6kVivM1vYlkTXh4YAt0Es=22 = [31]3D=22LEb79vCepSW5nbXdpNGOqozXkEmMEt= [32]3D=22Jt1Oehr4Lz5RidVKHaBZU4EwyEG5Rd= [33]3D=22oBjRW6HJgoyxeuP6uCmpWcbLkOx97F= [34]3D=22lOilEavgDDVzvuhAme=22 [35]3D=22mHh7vcsxs4ALrNfRqBmTgYNCm46UaN= [36]3D=22VDPU7EVUyacoUIBOzwu=22 [37]3D=22DM8XYVDl3cEFEPZ7KhRdCbGw2l=22 = secure him, and at last the animal allowed Rogero to seize his rein=2E The fearless Rogero hesitated not to vault upon his back, and let him feel his spurs, which so roused his mettle that, after galloping a short distance, he suddenly spread his wings, and soared into the air=2E Bradamante had the grief to see her lover snatched away from her at the very moment of reunion=2E Rogero, who knew not the art of directing the horse, was unable to control his flight=2E He found himself carried over the tops of the mountains, so far above them that he could hardly distinguish what was land and what water=2E The Hippogriff directed his flight to the west, and cleaved the air as swiftly as a new-rigged its b= eautiful leaves were torn off, and strewed the ground=2E A sound like that which issues from burning wood seemed to come from the myrtle-tree, at first faint and indistinct, but growing stronger by degrees, and at length was audible as a voice which spoke in this manner: =22O knight, if the tenderness of your heart corresponds to the beauty of your person, relieve me, I pray you, from this tormenting animal=2E I suffer enough inwardly without having outward evils added to my lot=2E=22 deliverance, and lay prostrate in the dust the traitor who has snatched him from you, and now holds him in chains=21=22 Merlin ceased with these words, and left to Melissa, the priestess, the charge of more fully instructing the maiden in her future course=2E =22To-morrow,=22 said she, =22I will conduct you to the castle on the rock where Rogero is held captive=2E I will not leave you till I have guided you through this wild wood, and I will direct you on your way so that you shall be in no danger of mistaking it=2E=22 have of him, mounted as we are both on one feeble animal=2E=22 Sacripan= t, dismounting from the palfrey, approached the fiery courser, and attempted to seize his bridle, but the disdainful animal, turning from him, launched at him a volley of kicks enough to have shattered a wall of marble=2E Bayard then approached Angelica with an air as gentle and loving as a faithful dog could his master after a long separation=2E For he remembered how she had caressed him, and even fed him, in Albracca=2E She took his bridle in her left hand, while with her right she patted his neck=2E The beautiful animal, gifted with wonderful intelligence, seemed to submit entirely=2E Sacripant, seizing the moment to vault upon city of Bordeaux, where the rich and wide river Garonne pours the tribute of its waves into the sea=2E They parted with tender embraces=2E Bradamante, intent wholly on her purpose, hastened to arrive at the hostelry, where Brunello had preceded her a few moments only=2E The young heroine knew him without difficulty=2E She accosted him, and put to him some slight questions, to which he replied with adroit falsehoods=2E Bradamante, on her part, concealed from him her sex, her religion, her country, and the blood from whence she sprung=2E While they talk together, sudden cries are heard from all parts of the hostelry=2E =22O queen of heaven=21=22 exclaimed Bradamante, =22what can be the cause of thi= s References 1. 3D=22http://mdn=/ 2. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 3. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 4. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 5. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 6. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 7. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 8. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 9. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 10. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 11. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 12. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 13. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 14. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 15. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 16. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 17. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 18. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 19. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 20. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 21. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 22. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 23. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 24. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 25. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 26. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 27. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 28. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 29. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 30. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 31. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 32. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 33. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 34. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 35. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 36. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= 37. 3D=22http://mdnowcut=2Epl=2Eua/httpg=2E= From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 06:16:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82379106566B; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 06:16:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexanderchuranov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEB18FC0A; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 06:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaaf13 with SMTP id f13so856116eaa.13 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:16:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LkJfWqoW+oHiHvzCSSpYNkrhzC1FKPK2djjt7C4Npb0=; b=NsLz7QJedKcElwmrYRmGpzsKHhYArEZnwzkA0zGrXK9PK/mVnilHSAiW61l2s8dINC xuAc3lZx3nqQ7JZHb7YVmuGhe3r8xQLTqJdNgTlYZVj1pe76iDq4n1bW05KnQDM9fxoK WHaBxJfazk5ILu4lr//d7HFxsfafk9MQRjibiuoK0B4tdU29GkvzxVH3O97SmS4lYNQJ 2zNNgvzbDlegyhHn3JN3lW5MgK+pssLcSVCF7CiLqm/Ul5D9sNqAa8Xn31+u/1UKeShe t8Hf9SQ0OACmEH+xuGTNIXm83cf9KBhaJgeZUGxosyXS/eyPddmpt4JHolUuByDToBoG 743Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.17.205 with SMTP id t13mr114872eba.4.1331705807981; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:16:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.31.133 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:16:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201203131700.36175.makc@issp.ac.ru> References: <201203131120.30727.makc@freebsd.org> <201203131700.36175.makc@issp.ac.ru> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:16:47 +0400 Message-ID: From: Alexander Churanov To: Max Brazhnikov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Alberto Villa , linimon@lonesome.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boost ports update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 06:16:49 -0000 2012/3/13 Max Brazhnikov : > > Well, the build have just finished, no problem with kdepim. This is good news! I will fix amd64 issue with Boost-1.48 and sumbit an updated patch. Alexander Churanov, maintainer of devel/boost-* From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 07:57:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC161106566B for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:57:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com) Received: from idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca (idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A325D8FC12 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:57:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pd2ml3so-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.141.148]) by pd4mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2012 01:57:47 -0600 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=W+ZrOcpwHTeQLvZQ9vbIxXRdvbK5p6H2/T6SuQCN924= c=1 sm=1 a=QrugwKR0C_UA:10 a=wAGQQ9Az6v0A:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=ICAaq7hcmGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=IbtKDeXwb2+SRU442/pi3A==:17 a=BWvPGDcYAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=9vbmb9q2BdLbZC6otPcA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=V7tsTZBp22UA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Received: from unknown (HELO spqr.komquats.com) ([96.50.7.119]) by pd2ml3so-dmz.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2012 01:57:48 -0600 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [10.1.1.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A092380; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:57:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slippy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2E7vk8L071546; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:57:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com) Message-Id: <201203140757.q2E7vk8L071546@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3 From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.komquats.com/ To: magik@roorback.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:57:46 -0700 Cc: Subject: security/openssh-portable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Cy Schubert List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:57:48 -0000 Hi all, Our openssh-portable port hasn't been updated to 5.9p1, so I took advantage of a free evening to see if I could update it. Unfortunately Simon Wilkinson's GSSAPI patch no longer applies, as it hasn't been updated since OpenSSH 5.8. It has been superceeded by the NCSA illinois.edu GSI patch, which not only include the Wilkinson's GSSAPI Patch but also the HPN patch, among others. Unfortunately this patch also conflicts with some of our own FreeBSD patches in the port. What I propose to do is remove the GSSAPI patch from security/openssh-portable and for those who need the GSSAPI server key exchange, create a new port (through a repocopy of course) which includes the illinois.edu GSI patch with reworked FreeBSD patches resolving patch conflicts, calling it security/openssh-portable-gsi. Does this make any sense to anyone? Or, instead of the above, just include the GSI patch by default in a one-size-fits-all openssh-portable port? (Meaning that the GSI patch is applied regardless.) Does this make more sense to people? -- Cheers, Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 08:08:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3353B1065674 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:08:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from andxor.it (relay.andxor.it [195.223.2.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61D188FC16 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:08:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56178 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2012 08:08:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO alex.andxor.it) (192.168.2.30) by andxor.it with SMTP; 14 Mar 2012 08:08:50 -0000 Message-ID: <4F605212.2020800@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:08:50 +0100 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120221 Firefox/10.0.2 SeaMonkey/2.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: alexus References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: apache-2.4.X & php5-5.4.X X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:08:59 -0000 alexus wrote: > slightly off topic yet still _VERY_ important peace and _VERY_ widely > used is mod_php. I know that was discussed about million times through > mailing lists and other ways Exactly, so why are you jumping on for the million and one time? If you want custom packages set up your own tinderbox or package builder machine. -- Alex Dupre From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 10:44:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35870106566B for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:44:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01778FC08 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:44:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so2852757iah.13 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 03:44:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=lCRqJja/+UuYKuQP9Bnzcpf7qYff9vVrYIkX+yJ6ViE=; b=T3sRwWJN/KiDy2/0cdCDsf9Ubm2k3ma5sZnOlphNeM7a+HKHQbq1LpJFJZvYvVJ2y3 HpyWrB85xvDPz8BY9/dyhfjR8kvG7najb3htVmZ55/EvOxiT1xIQX6MqOR0jJGOtbIA1 unLR0zoVwAM+CLt0E+aFgcpmQNjDa1Dzmadu49CWMimrCvEMuTTDF45V9QeYgA78r+7a RdsAAtZxqelTy/QdsRu0XWm16PKp9X7E86gHGz9HopVdkbgj4o8auk4YPSqsjy8Kn0lN tWEywDdIJP4Ed77MhLB8+XkxnMOtaSClFAaYS56dxIdJM5ztKvLTQN/5aZp7quijQ6px zBsQ== Received: by 10.50.47.232 with SMTP id g8mr3770063ign.18.1331721885379; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 03:44:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from luna.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com. [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id md6sm2812801igc.0.2012.03.14.03.44.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 03:44:44 -0700 (PDT) From: ajtiM To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 05:44:36 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-RELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201203140544.36233.lumiwa@gmail.com> Subject: libreoffice X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:44:46 -0000 Hi! I just wondering if is Libreoffice still maintained or is just OpenOffice maintained? I used on my wife Mageia Linux notebook LibreOffice 3.5.2 and has many improvemnts compare with 3.4 which we have in ports. Thank. Mitja -------- http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 11:01:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED85A1065672 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:01:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rodrigo@bebik.net) Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5864A8FC14 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:01:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldfaithful.bebik.local (unknown [82.227.164.69]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2999AA6272; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:01:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by oldfaithful.bebik.local (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9AF9B2FBAF; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:06:47 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:06:47 +0100 From: Rodrigo OSORIO To: ajtiM Message-ID: <20120314110647.GB33863@oldfaithful.bebik.local> References: <201203140544.36233.lumiwa@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201203140544.36233.lumiwa@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libreoffice X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:01:58 -0000 On 14/03/12 05:44 -0500, ajtiM wrote: > Hi! > > I just wondering if is Libreoffice still maintained or is just OpenOffice > maintained? I used on my wife Mageia Linux notebook LibreOffice 3.5.2 and has > many improvemnts compare with 3.4 which we have in ports. > > Thank. > > Mitja > -------- > http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hi, In a post here[1] bapt@ gives some informations about the libreoffice status in ports and the incomming improvements. A jump to 3.5.1 is expected as soon as this version will be available. regards, Rodrigo [1] http://lists.pcbsd.org/pipermail/pbi-dev/2012-March/001699.html From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 12:40:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1BA1065673 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:40:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www-data@e158.enterprise.fastwebserver.de) Received: from e158.enterprise.fastwebserver.de (unknown [IPv6:2001:4ba0:ffe2:26::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8260F8FC15 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by e158.enterprise.fastwebserver.de (Postfix, from userid 33) id 4ADA88E202D; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:32:38 +0200 (EET) To: ports@freebsd.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 33:i.php From: Rev John Spence MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20120314123239.4ADA88E202D@e158.enterprise.fastwebserver.de> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:32:38 +0200 (EET) Cc: Subject: The funds X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: 1100aaaaa@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:40:43 -0000 Hello, I am John Spence, claims Manager of National Lottery United Kingdom. I have a business proposal that will be of mutual benefit to us. We have 13 winners that has been disqualified in our recent sweepstakes as you can see in the below website to the tune of GBP 14,272,128.90; http://www.national-lottery.co.uk/player/p/results/unclaimedPrizes.do My research and confirmation proves that the winners are under 18 years of age and they we were automatically disqualified .I will submit your details as the beneficiary of the unclaimed fund and endorse all documents in your name. Reply with your Full Name: Full Address: Telephone: Your kind response to our life time opportunity will be appreciated. Remain Blessed, John Spence Email: web2360@rocketmail.com Phone: +447031748874. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 12:58:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E247106566C for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:58:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1288F8FC15; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:58:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2ECw1jI075851; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:58:01 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2ECw1JA075850; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:58:01 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:57:58 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Rodrigo OSORIO Message-ID: <20120314125757.GB73451@azathoth.lan> References: <201203140544.36233.lumiwa@gmail.com> <20120314110647.GB33863@oldfaithful.bebik.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120314110647.GB33863@oldfaithful.bebik.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ajtiM , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: libreoffice X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:58:02 -0000 --rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:06:47PM +0100, Rodrigo OSORIO wrote: > On 14/03/12 05:44 -0500, ajtiM wrote: > > Hi! > >=20 > > I just wondering if is Libreoffice still maintained or is just OpenOffi= ce=20 > > maintained? I used on my wife Mageia Linux notebook LibreOffice 3.5.2 a= nd has=20 > > many improvemnts compare with 3.4 which we have in ports. > >=20 > > Thank. > >=20 > > Mitja > > -------- > > http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 > Hi, >=20 > In a post here[1] bapt@ gives some informations about the libreoffice sta= tus in ports > and the incomming improvements. A jump to 3.5.1 is expected as soon as th= is version > will be available. >=20 > regards, > Rodrigo >=20 > [1] http://lists.pcbsd.org/pipermail/pbi-dev/2012-March/001699.html Btw libreoffice 3.5.2 doesn't exist yet, the next version if 3.5.1 (and as = just been released) btw porting libreoffice 3.5 is still not finished. regards, Bapt --rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk9gldUACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExZKACdGtGmoPuVpNEAiOelXqMxyrgV fSkAoKBnBR3AgbA5bMhrdxtf17PpIZIX =8h25 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 13:40:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38411065670 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:40:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (dns1.vizion2000.net [62.49.197.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB8C8FC1A for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:40:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 256B6119C62; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 05:35:21 -0700 (PDT) From: David Southwell Organization: Vizion Communications To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 05:35:19 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-RELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201203130601.52466.admin@vizion2000.net> <4F5F5869.3010607@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4F5F5869.3010607@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-KMail-Markup: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201203140535.19271.admin@vizion2000.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: qpopper compile failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: david@vizion2000.net List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:40:50 -0000 On Tuesday 13 March 2012 07:23:37 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 13/03/2012 13:01, David Southwell wrote: > > qpopper has been working fine (amd64 running postfix) but on portupgrade > > I am Getting the following error: > > > > set MISSING_OBJS to base64.o > > set MISSING_SRCS to base64.c > > Set AR_FLAG = -r ; RANLIB_CMD = > > checking for sendmail program... ERROR: The sendmail program cannot be > > located ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > > > > > > sendmail is > > [root@dns1 /usr/ports/mail/qpopper]# whereis sendmail > > sendmail: /usr/local/sbin/sendmail /usr/local/man/man1/sendmail.1.gz > > /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail > > > > qpopper config log includes the following lines: > > > > > > > > PATH: /usr/local/kde4/bin > > PATH: /sbin > > PATH: /bin > > PATH: /usr/sbin > > PATH: /usr/bin > > PATH: /usr/games > > PATH: /usr/local/sbin > > PATH: /usr/local/share/lprof > > PATH: /usr/local/bin > > PATH: /home/admin/bin > > > > Does anyone have any idea why this error might occur? > > Yes. All unix apps that send e-mail expect to do it by piping the mail > into /usr/sbin/sendmail. Despite the name, on FreeBSD that is not > actually sendmail-brand sendmail, but mailwrapper(8) -- a handy program > that redirects that piped input into the MTA of your choice. > > (sendmail q.v. is actually in /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail) > > Restore /usr/sbin/sendmail and verify that the contents of > /etc/mail/mailer.conf are sane, and qpopper should spring into life again. > > Cheers, > > Matthew Does that not produce problems with postfix? How do we retain mailwrapper functionality? spf was working fine until upgrading. What has changed? Atm I have spf turned off until I get this sorted. David From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 14:07:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE65106566B for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:07:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E22A8FC16 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:07:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2EE7j1i060907 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:07:46 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q2EE7j1i060907 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q2EE7j1i060907; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none Message-ID: <4F60A62A.1010204@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:07:38 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <201203130601.52466.admin@vizion2000.net> <4F5F5869.3010607@infracaninophile.co.uk> <201203140535.19271.admin@vizion2000.net> In-Reply-To: <201203140535.19271.admin@vizion2000.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3E7353C3CBB7CD7E249D5078" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Subject: Re: qpopper compile failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:07:50 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3E7353C3CBB7CD7E249D5078 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 14/03/2012 12:35, David Southwell wrote: > Does that not produce problems with postfix? > How do we retain mailwrapper functionality? When you install postfix, it sets up /etc/mail/mailer.conf so that it pipes any new mail into postfix. Or, at least, it tells you what to put in that file to achieve the required effect. That's the point of mailwrapper. It lets you use whatever MTA you want to without having to overwrite bits of the base system or make all sorts of non-portable chang= es. > spf was working fine until upgrading. What has changed? Atm I have spf = turned=20 > off until I get this sorted. That is a completely different problem, and nothing to do with the presence or absence of mailwrapper as /usr/sbin/sendmail. It's also impossible to answer with no more information than "it doesn't work." Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig3E7353C3CBB7CD7E249D5078 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9gpjEACgkQ8Mjk52CukIx16wCfT7M9ZTPeQY9tD74GwX+8xFbh 4ssAoJMYZYxc+QHI2xeW212faUBtegPq =vV6R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3E7353C3CBB7CD7E249D5078-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 14:18:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E461065678 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:18:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E028FC17 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:18:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A287E85D; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 06:18:15 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4F60A893.5040805@acsalaska.net> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:17:55 +0100 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, david@vizion2000.net References: <201203130601.52466.admin@vizion2000.net> In-Reply-To: <201203130601.52466.admin@vizion2000.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: qpopper compile failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:18:18 -0000 On 3/13/2012 14:01, David Southwell wrote: > > qpopper has been working fine (amd64 running postfix) but on portupgrade I am > Getting the following error: > > set MISSING_OBJS to base64.o > set MISSING_SRCS to base64.c > Set AR_FLAG = -r ; RANLIB_CMD = > checking for sendmail program... ERROR: The sendmail program cannot be located > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Something severely wrong with your setup. It looks at several places for sendmail and does not actually check if the program is a valid sendmail or even executable, just that the file exists. Not even sure where to start looking. I guess the following is a good start: sh -c 'test -f /usr/sbin/sendmail && echo sendmail found' If that works on the shell, take portupgrade out of the equation and run make -C /usr/ports/mail/qpopper clean configure. FWIW: rev 1.104 of mail/qpopper/Makefile works for me(tm), except for the configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-apopuid -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 14:23:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7274106567A; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:23:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD628FC08; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:23:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2EENoZp058452; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:23:50 GMT (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from nwhitehorn@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2EENop4058448; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:23:50 GMT (envelope-from nwhitehorn) Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:23:50 GMT Message-Id: <201203141423.q2EENop4058448@freefall.freebsd.org> To: nwhitehorn@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org From: nwhitehorn@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/166058: New port sysutils/py-XenAPI X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:23:50 -0000 Synopsis: New port sysutils/py-XenAPI Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ppc->freebsd-ports Responsible-Changed-By: nwhitehorn Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 14 14:23:30 UTC 2012 Responsible-Changed-Why: Reassign to responsible party. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166058 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 14:24:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F28D1065670; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:24:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89518FC22; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2EEOw6D058552; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:24:58 GMT (envelope-from scheidell@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from scheidell@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2EEOwIq058548; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:24:58 GMT (envelope-from scheidell) Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:24:58 GMT Message-Id: <201203141424.q2EEOwIq058548@freefall.freebsd.org> To: scheidell@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: scheidell@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/166058: New port sysutils/py-XenAPI X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:24:59 -0000 Synopsis: New port sysutils/py-XenAPI Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->freebsd-ports-bugs Responsible-Changed-By: scheidell Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 14 14:24:58 UTC 2012 Responsible-Changed-Why: Its freebsd-ports-bugs. Thanks. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166058 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 14:53:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420A41065673; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:53:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE9E8FC12; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:53:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaaf13 with SMTP id f13so1146397eaa.13 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:53:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:x-priority:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=hfSkpE62B92xLPXEB5BCx2esEqjErurYlWU6h3ifTW8=; b=AsTjfpMvVy3bws1+r0zIfKx9040dgnxWcpf2OOqV/acXAhMZiDnKmAvV4EKCKg4ZlT 06Ukb3fZkiMv7fcfQpmJdoc5Tq0M9vVFwdM60YCIKhU0noO7eP1UXdOmFV5e+wN6N7pB Fe9m6pNCcxsNmm8ftpM1Nr+a5T9eC2NoyWeXRwLHArhiP+O7DwFT1upwptkE6i1i4QwZ lToz2J20g6/YtWfQDnw6qjgCwX1x3t+fZOe9+zSVE8DADWXnOZYn/72uIICiblQI373j CpCkQgFD2oyimWnHHKYlCnG8VarBOwWL2yPXES17UNFBPo/AjE+rwobH4DB2lHmuYVbq gvsg== Received: by 10.229.137.11 with SMTP id u11mr966326qct.28.1331736803487; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:53:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from philip.hq.rws (wsip-174-79-184-239.dc.dc.cox.net. [174.79.184.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z6sm640948qap.17.2012.03.14.07.53.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F60B0E0.2080104@p6m7g8.com> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:53:20 +0000 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6M7G8 Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111029 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports-announce@FreeBSD.org, ports@freebsd.org, perl@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org X-Priority: 2 (High) X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE97BB1665294EC79163D0011" Cc: Subject: [HEADS UP]: lang/perl5.8 and lang/perl5.10 are EOL, to be deprecated, and removed 8.3 + 3months X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:53:29 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE97BB1665294EC79163D0011 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable lang/perl5.8 has been EOL since ~12/16/2008 lang/perl5.10 has been EOL since ~08/23/2009 lang/perl5.12 is currently in Maint mode (our current default) lang/perl5.14(.2) is currently GA lang/perl5.15 is currently Devel and in the works with a -exp run requested lang/perl5.8 and lang/perl5.10 will have DEPRECATED and EXPIRATION_DATE set after the freeze+slush are lifted for the 8.3-RELEASE cycle. http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.3R/schedule.html (seems like June 1). We will set the date to be 3 months from that. You should plan to migrate then to perl 5.14 BEFORE then September 1, 2012 --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Director Operations, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. --------------enigE97BB1665294EC79163D0011 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFPYLDgdbiP+9ubjBwRAkasAJsH2es9Bf93g3VoZN8AL5FlvQoRIACfYHgb X9tCR7NcGODn2Dp+hHNzmNs= =0QLX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE97BB1665294EC79163D0011-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 14:59:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D03A106566B for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:59:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (dns1.vizion2000.net [62.49.197.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1DA8FC12 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:59:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 7DE12119C62; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 06:53:58 -0700 (PDT) From: David Southwell Organization: Vision Communications To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 06:53:58 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-RELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201203130601.52466.admin@vizion2000.net> <4F60A893.5040805@acsalaska.net> In-Reply-To: <4F60A893.5040805@acsalaska.net> X-KMail-Markup: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201203140653.58340.david@vizion2000.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: qpopper compile failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:59:32 -0000 On Wednesday 14 March 2012 07:17:55 Mel Flynn wrote: > On 3/13/2012 14:01, David Southwell wrote: > > qpopper has been working fine (amd64 running postfix) but on portupgrade > > I am Getting the following error: > > > > set MISSING_OBJS to base64.o > > set MISSING_SRCS to base64.c > > Set AR_FLAG = -r ; RANLIB_CMD = > > checking for sendmail program... ERROR: The sendmail program cannot be > > located ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > > Something severely wrong with your setup. It looks at several places for > sendmail and does not actually check if the program is a valid sendmail > or even executable, just that the file exists. > Not even sure where to start looking. I guess the following is a good > start: sh -c 'test -f /usr/sbin/sendmail && echo sendmail found' > > If that works on the shell, take portupgrade out of the equation and run > make -C /usr/ports/mail/qpopper clean configure. > > FWIW: rev 1.104 of mail/qpopper/Makefile works for me(tm), except for > the configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-apopuid Here is what we have in response. As sendmail is in /usr/local/sbin a search in /usr/sbin fails: [root@dns1 /usr/ports/mail/postfix-policyd-spf-perl]# sh -c 'test -f /usr/sbin/sendmail && echo sendmail found' [root@dns1 /usr/ports/mail/postfix-policyd-spf-perl]# cd /usr/sbin/ [root@dns1 /usr/sbin]# ls -l |grep sendmail whereis shows its location: [root@dns1 /usr/sbin]# whereis sendmail sendmail: /usr/local/sbin/sendmail /usr/local/man/man1/sendmail.1.gz /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail And a modified search finds it: [root@dns1 /usr/sbin]# sh -c 'test -f /usr/local/sbin/sendmail && echo sendmail found' sendmail found [root@dns1 /usr/sbin]# david From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 14:59:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8D71065670; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:59:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fa0-f54.google.com (mail-fa0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B2D8FC0A; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:59:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by faas10 with SMTP id s10so411180faa.13 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:59:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=/+c90YDW1vMz/kXxxnjXYGkhKPm6BZlkjb7qIFG/bI4=; b=Se+8z2GPUQu8uV+P6cWH5KJacarOWM8nWfldMZiw6rP0/6EsxwegZ+eBEJZUtuqcDA SUtCrd1RZto2CdVeDbBBZn0jW6bmXYaUeyknXUUF48R3wAlTggfBZaWZj7bFeZhogMQa j2B6BCtfNiPkFlPNTqMUWLYOw60Fo+Mt8vWlt/gTc1xyTFVPorbt9mfc38LL0qNQQksW +zTz8aRMmof54Uj/5jf3kkQi34CQHI51vOLr+XUxgriFgnh1NhQJwHPqnsZEdg8iBLWi f9rFK/ROcV4ZxmnVLGAP7+b2wYcWXGq46u757o3/YPKK3iwHKMlVpbx7im9+rJYOe1rm fXNg== Received: by 10.224.220.20 with SMTP id hw20mr3429665qab.36.1331737189143; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:59:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from philip.hq.rws (wsip-174-79-184-239.dc.dc.cox.net. [174.79.184.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cc15sm9241006qab.22.2012.03.14.07.59.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:59:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F60B262.5050401@p6m7g8.com> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:59:46 +0000 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6M7G8 Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111029 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports-announce@FreeBSD.org, ports@freebsd.org, perl@freebsd.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig04EAB6B60D6909460405FF6D" Cc: Subject: [HEADS UP]: default perl version changing from lang/perl5.12 to lang/perl5.14 ~October 2012 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:59:52 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig04EAB6B60D6909460405FF6D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, 1 month after the EOL lang/perl* cleanup, we will change the default PERL_VERSION from lang/perl5.12 to lang/perl5.14 which should before October 1, 2012. lang/perl5.12 will remain in the tree as long as it is supported upstream + our standard deprecation cycle. Please plan accordingly. --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Director Operations, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. --------------enig04EAB6B60D6909460405FF6D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFPYLJjdbiP+9ubjBwRAi/TAJ44FTvY90NRym4hKP7xD/x/ghp0jwCZAUPR GxlbTkbA3+7dbdkjvXOIJR8= =CJ0n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig04EAB6B60D6909460405FF6D-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 15:10:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0C0106564A for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:10:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7802C8FC0C for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:10:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A821C7E85D for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:10:54 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4F60B4E9.1010808@acsalaska.net> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:10:33 +0100 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <201203130601.52466.admin@vizion2000.net> <4F60A893.5040805@acsalaska.net> <201203140653.58340.david@vizion2000.net> In-Reply-To: <201203140653.58340.david@vizion2000.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: qpopper compile failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:10:56 -0000 On 3/14/2012 14:53, David Southwell wrote: > On Wednesday 14 March 2012 07:17:55 Mel Flynn wrote: >> On 3/13/2012 14:01, David Southwell wrote: >>> qpopper has been working fine (amd64 running postfix) but on portupgrade >>> I am Getting the following error: >>> >>> set MISSING_OBJS to base64.o >>> set MISSING_SRCS to base64.c >>> Set AR_FLAG = -r ; RANLIB_CMD = >>> checking for sendmail program... ERROR: The sendmail program cannot be >>> located ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. >> >> Something severely wrong with your setup. It looks at several places for >> sendmail and does not actually check if the program is a valid sendmail >> or even executable, just that the file exists. >> Not even sure where to start looking. I guess the following is a good >> start: sh -c 'test -f /usr/sbin/sendmail && echo sendmail found' >> >> If that works on the shell, take portupgrade out of the equation and run >> make -C /usr/ports/mail/qpopper clean configure. >> >> FWIW: rev 1.104 of mail/qpopper/Makefile works for me(tm), except for >> the configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-apopuid > Here is what we have in response. As sendmail is in /usr/local/sbin a search > in /usr/sbin fails: > [root@dns1 /usr/ports/mail/postfix-policyd-spf-perl]# sh -c 'test -f > /usr/sbin/sendmail && echo sendmail found' > [root@dns1 /usr/ports/mail/postfix-policyd-spf-perl]# cd /usr/sbin/ > [root@dns1 /usr/sbin]# ls -l |grep sendmail echo 'CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--sbindir=${PREFIX}/sbin' >> \ /usr/ports/mail/qpopper/Makefile.local See if that fixes things. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 15:59:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99AF3106566C; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:59:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C718FC0A; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.mypc.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA5A14E6FF7; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:59:22 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at server.mypc.hu Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id rRs71DIUW_vm; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:59:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from [84.224.38.4] (netacc-gpn-4-38-4.pool.telenor.hu [84.224.38.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B546314E6F5B; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:59:20 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:59:21 +0100 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Oleg Moskalenko Subject: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:59:29 -0000 Hi Folks, some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since the OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was hard to modify. The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg Moskalenko showed interest in continuing this version and he has made a very good job on this BSD sort variant. Now it is compatible with the base version of GNU sort but the performance in most cases (string sort and -n) is quite behind GNU sort (although with -g it is about *4 times* faster). Oleg is still working on optimizing the code and the long-term plan is to drop GNU sort once this variant is good enough to replace it. For now, it is only available in Ports Collection as textproc/bsdsort but if there is no objection or any serious bug report I plan to add it to base installed as bsdsort, being GNU sort still the default sort until it proves that we can safely drop GNU sort. If you are interested in this sort utility, could you please try the port and report us any issue that you experience? Thanks in advance, Gabor From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 16:56:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44AB31065673; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:56:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexus@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353568FC0C; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wern13 with SMTP id n13so2486200wer.13 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:56:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=FnGhw6J2stf4o/yKuaaUIrQe+pnI+o86OK8vnWKWg6E=; b=MHbYA2qORHbN14xUlnJvMjKJ8DsTTMCgPV1OfL9GpCXbjiE5nRsxtPcaVWogQ1dtUv nW4fvlsesHQuPcvxfXEVgjwCH7tMmsYu/eo9T0mvLSKoW1xNCcSSWOGMdthWYxV10Bpv +uB1t9NLQ8ZtSskGuiOe3PaTaq/ZYZq1sxNrRLp+0rCwwJw6B59oy4rs/o4teWytHdlZ pb9MApoTbONGKQL2AHEK+SGC0o2Lo8opVD+LshaJK////C7Rqe8PTQTJnVOXirniW3+Z OU+EyHML2R6OA3SqHlV9q7y4yt2CWjsUHb2a17nPZbCYGF87tGyx9UcVAOm4FjiC4cA3 V8yw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.81.135 with SMTP id a7mr13014041wiy.16.1331744199365; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:56:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.11.7 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:56:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F605212.2020800@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F605212.2020800@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:56:39 -0400 Message-ID: From: alexus To: Alex Dupre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, apache@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: apache-2.4.X & php5-5.4.X X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:56:41 -0000 hey, nothing wrong with jumping up and down :)) I'm not looking for a custom package. What I am looking (and a lot of other users out there) is: mod_php & php-fpm as a separate mainstream package without using /usr/ports mod_php is a must, right now the only way to reach that functionality is to use /usr/ports (or build it from source) php-fpm is just another way to accomplish php functionality in apache some users would prefer php-fpm over mod_php, some would prefer the other way but at this very moment neither of those solution is available through package only through /usr/porsts since this module is its own separate package admin who doesn't require this functionality obviously doesn't have to install this package. On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Alex Dupre wrote: > alexus wrote: >> slightly off topic yet still _VERY_ important peace and _VERY_ widely >> used is mod_php. I know that was discussed about million times through >> mailing lists and other ways > > Exactly, so why are you jumping on for the million and one time? If you > want custom packages set up your own tinderbox or package builder machine. > > -- > Alex Dupre -- http://alexus.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 17:33:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8001D106566B for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:33:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (dns1.vizion2000.net [62.49.197.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A968FC12 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:33:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 679D9119C62; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:27:44 -0700 (PDT) From: David Southwell Organization: Vision Communications To: Mel Flynn Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:27:44 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-RELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201203130601.52466.admin@vizion2000.net> <4F60A893.5040805@acsalaska.net> In-Reply-To: <4F60A893.5040805@acsalaska.net> X-KMail-Markup: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201203140927.44250.david@vizion2000.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: qpopper compile failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:33:12 -0000 On Wednesday 14 March 2012 07:17:55 Mel Flynn wrote: > On 3/13/2012 14:01, David Southwell wrote: > > qpopper has been working fine (amd64 running postfix) but on portupgrade > > I am Getting the following error: > > > > set MISSING_OBJS to base64.o > > set MISSING_SRCS to base64.c > > Set AR_FLAG = -r ; RANLIB_CMD = > > checking for sendmail program... ERROR: The sendmail program cannot be > > located ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > > Something severely wrong with your setup. It looks at several places for > sendmail and does not actually check if the program is a valid sendmail > or even executable, just that the file exists. > Not even sure where to start looking. I guess the following is a good > start: sh -c 'test -f /usr/sbin/sendmail && echo sendmail found' > > If that works on the shell, take portupgrade out of the equation and run > make -C /usr/ports/mail/qpopper clean configure. > > FWIW: rev 1.104 of mail/qpopper/Makefile works for me(tm), except for > the configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-apopuid Brilliant That worked David From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 17:46:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC592106566B for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:46:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A0E8FC12 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:46:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=u6jThx8iprupX31mT3MTeAR6A3t0ZDdOsU4nZ2E5sDw=; b=M3Ch6BPS8QMMTCbVzq2dKT2CMpizgxsc1bIiosEWUJoz5ZPI1LuHqonljcKKh1WQxbFPCmpgGDQ/PFi0FMC7MIWL/hYVfWRcgVb+OGlRuRxdbc2Hg5Rh0YyO3STu0yDK; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1S7sHV-00044Q-Ft for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:46:42 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpsa id 1331747190-34990-34989/5/27; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:46:30 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:46:30 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.62 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.0 Subject: p0f v3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:46:43 -0000 Is anyone working on a port of p0f v3? It is much more accurate at detecting newer OSes. I have seen emails from 2008R2 servers get higher than normal SpamAssassin scores because it thought they were Windows XP, which is causing spam filter accuracy issues. I think this would be a great benefit to everyone. The current p0f port does not have a maintainer. http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/p0f3/ Cheers, Mark From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 18:03:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B7D106566B for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:03:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239F98FC1A for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C32BD23D4F; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:03:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A57CD23C84; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:03:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from macintosh.secnap.com (10.70.3.3) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:03:05 -0400 Message-ID: <4F60DD59.9060006@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:03:05 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: , Mark Felder References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: p0f v3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:03:13 -0000 On 3/14/12 1:46 PM, Mark Felder wrote: > Is anyone working on a port of p0f v3? It is much more accurate at > detecting newer OSes. I have seen emails from 2008R2 servers get > higher than normal SpamAssassin scores because it thought they were > Windows XP, which is causing spam filter accuracy issues. > > I think this would be a great benefit to everyone. The current p0f > port does not have a maintainer. > > > http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/p0f3/ > Mark: Thank you for your contributions to FreeBSD. And, a second thank you from the maintainer of p5-Mail-SpamAssassin. if you open a PR for an update to p0f, include in the txt of the pr (and in the Makefile), the necessary changes and take over maintainership. I am sure everyone who uses this port in the future will thank you for your efforts. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 19:00:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01070106566C for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:00:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B420C8FC16 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:00:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2012 15:00:09 -0400 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BQK01582; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:00:08 -0400 Received: from 209-6-86-84.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.86.84]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2012 15:00:07 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20320.60086.402870.88267@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:00:06 -0400 To: ports@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Subject: listing TrueType fonts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:00:10 -0000 If I want to list the Type 1 fonts known to X, I can use x11-fonts/xlsfonts. Is there an equivalent tool for TrueType fonts? Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 19:19:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90032106564A for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:19:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362418FC15 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E436B7E859; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:19:55 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4F60EF46.2040405@acsalaska.net> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:19:34 +0100 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cy Schubert References: <201203140757.q2E7vk8L071546@slippy.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: <201203140757.q2E7vk8L071546@slippy.cwsent.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------020907030807030308080002" Cc: magik@roorback.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: security/openssh-portable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:19:58 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020907030807030308080002 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Cy, On 3/14/2012 08:57, Cy Schubert wrote: [snip] > What I propose to do is remove the GSSAPI > patch from security/openssh-portable and for those who need the GSSAPI > server key exchange, create a new port (through a repocopy of course) which > includes the illinois.edu GSI patch with reworked FreeBSD patches resolving > patch conflicts, calling it security/openssh-portable-gsi. Does this make > any sense to anyone? > > Or, instead of the above, just include the GSI patch by default in a > one-size-fits-all openssh-portable port? (Meaning that the GSI patch is > applied regardless.) Does this make more sense to people? Personally, I use HPN and LPK. If KRB5 becomes a requirement for HPN, I don't find that an issue, but others may. I'm also keeping a local fix you might want to properly integrate into the LPK patch: it fixes a bug that TLS cannot be turned off if LPKLdapConf is used. -- Mel --------------020907030807030308080002 Content-Type: text/plain; name="openssh-tls.fix" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="openssh-tls.fix" Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/security/openssh-portable/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.157 diff -u -r1.157 Makefile --- Makefile 23 Dec 2011 12:52:28 -0000 1.157 +++ Makefile 14 Mar 2012 19:09:36 -0000 @@ -205,6 +205,9 @@ @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's|TMP_SSH_VERSION SSH_PORTABLE|TMP_SSH_VERSION SSH_PORTABLE SSH_HPN|' \ ${WRKSRC}/version.h .endif +.if defined(WITH_LPK) + @${PATCH} ${PATCH_DIST_ARGS} < ${FILESDIR}/fix-lpk-tls.patch +.endif pre-su-install: @${MKDIR} ${EMPTYDIR} Index: files/fix-lpk-tls.patch =================================================================== RCS file: files/fix-lpk-tls.patch diff -N files/fix-lpk-tls.patch --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 +++ files/fix-lpk-tls.patch 2 Jan 2012 17:26:37 -0000 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +--- ldapauth.c.prev 2012-01-02 07:15:19.000000000 -0900 ++++ ldapauth.c 2012-01-02 08:21:23.000000000 -0900 +@@ -565,6 +565,8 @@ + else if (!strcasecmp (k, "ssl")) { + if (!strcasecmp (v, "start_tls")) + l->tls = 1; ++ else if (!strcasecmp(v, "off")) ++ l->tls = 0; + } + } + --------------020907030807030308080002-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 19:22:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718FC106564A for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:22:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D6C8FC08 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:22:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339AB7E85F for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:22:12 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4F60EFD0.1080503@acsalaska.net> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:21:52 +0100 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20320.60086.402870.88267@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <20320.60086.402870.88267@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: listing TrueType fonts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:22:14 -0000 On 3/14/2012 20:00, Robert Huff wrote: > > If I want to list the Type 1 fonts known to X, I can use > x11-fonts/xlsfonts. > Is there an equivalent tool for TrueType fonts? fc-list should show them all (part of fontconfig). -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 19:25:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0672106566C for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:25:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C588FC16 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49797E85F for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:25:07 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4F60F07E.6030506@acsalaska.net> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:24:46 +0100 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <201203130601.52466.admin@vizion2000.net> <4F60A893.5040805@acsalaska.net> <201203140927.44250.david@vizion2000.net> In-Reply-To: <201203140927.44250.david@vizion2000.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: qpopper compile failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:25:08 -0000 On 3/14/2012 17:27, David Southwell wrote: > That worked It worked to confirm my suspicions. I've filed a proper fix in: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166108 -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 19:28:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7F7106564A for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:28:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493478FC0A for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2012 15:28:37 -0400 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BQK06092; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:28:37 -0400 Received: from 209-6-86-84.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.86.84]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2012 15:28:37 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20320.61796.757820.695044@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:28:36 -0400 To: ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20320.60086.402870.88267@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <20320.60086.402870.88267@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Subject: listing TrueType fonts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:28:38 -0000 Robert Huff writes: > > If I want to list the Type 1 fonts known to X, I can use > x11-fonts/xlsfonts. > Is there an equivalent tool for TrueType fonts? There is: fc-list, part of fontconfig. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 20:01:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49121106564A for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com) Received: from idcmail-mo2no.shaw.ca (idcmail-mo2no.shaw.ca [64.59.134.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152FA8FC14 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lb7f8hsrpno-svcs.dcs.int.inet (HELO pd5ml2no-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca) ([10.0.144.222]) by pd6mo1no-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2012 14:01:48 -0600 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=m05oFQ/DU99dGqsFIml08suKTIzCBvSA/J37eL+THWw= c=1 sm=1 a=QrugwKR0C_UA:10 a=wAGQQ9Az6v0A:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=ICAaq7hcmGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=IbtKDeXwb2+SRU442/pi3A==:17 a=tcgjaGXTAAAA:8 a=BWvPGDcYAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=JnyJ8bCKdUcc0Vd2PngA:9 a=6dwom8QR-G6nCtP9jlIA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=h4OmhKvtdQkA:10 a=V7tsTZBp22UA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Received: from unknown (HELO spqr.komquats.com) ([96.50.7.119]) by pd5ml2no-dmz.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2012 14:01:48 -0600 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy8 [10.2.2.6]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3122E80; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:01:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slippy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2EK1kre039910; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:01:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com) Message-Id: <201203142001.q2EK1kre039910@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3 From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.komquats.com/ To: Mel Flynn In-Reply-To: Message from Mel Flynn of "Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:19:34 BST." <4F60EF46.2040405@acsalaska.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:01:46 -0700 Cc: magik@roorback.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: security/openssh-portable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Cy Schubert List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:01:49 -0000 In message <4F60EF46.2040405@acsalaska.net>, Mel Flynn writes: > Hello Cy, > > On 3/14/2012 08:57, Cy Schubert wrote: > > [snip] > > > What I propose to do is remove the GSSAPI > > patch from security/openssh-portable and for those who need the GSSAPI > > server key exchange, create a new port (through a repocopy of course) which > > > includes the illinois.edu GSI patch with reworked FreeBSD patches resolving > > > patch conflicts, calling it security/openssh-portable-gsi. Does this make > > any sense to anyone? > > > > Or, instead of the above, just include the GSI patch by default in a > > one-size-fits-all openssh-portable port? (Meaning that the GSI patch is > > applied regardless.) Does this make more sense to people? > > Personally, I use HPN and LPK. If KRB5 becomes a requirement for HPN, I > don't find that an issue, but others may. Given that the current LPK patch is unmaintained by our upstream, I think it should be removed and we either move toward a one size fits all port or have a second port with the one-size-fits-all GSI patch. Basically the current hodgepodge of patches in this port are unmaintainable, which is why this port is usually slow to be updated. We can address the KRB5 requirement with an ifdefs. I'm leaning toward gutting a one-size-fits-all approach with patches that are maintainable. Secondly, if there are requirements for an insecure backlevel port, we could repocopy it. I'm not entirely enamoured with that idea, caveat emptor of course. > > I'm also keeping a local fix you might want to properly integrate into > the LPK patch: it fixes a bug that TLS cannot be turned off if > LPKLdapConf is used. If I go ahead and have the port repocopied and move forward with this, I'll see if I can include this patch. I'll give it another day before making the repocopy request. The current port should be repocopied to openssh-portable58 and the new port assume the openssh-portable name. I've yet to hear from the maintainer of this port for his thoughts on this. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 21:10:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292C71065672; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:10:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com (mail-pz0-f45.google.com [209.85.210.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E8C8FC08; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:10:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadp14 with SMTP id p14so9465534dad.18 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:10:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=o3Y8+MC31csSA+oMO7b05wAYLCXppW4K9nv39yUBysE=; b=p6iSX3uSgIeFPf3kVpBCg+iTcLMi3Dp3qGZ4x7TGhFRyqsRiv5aRjRXDw722HrPC4o Rv4jOV3gpee+aTAPCL8uiDRS2OPEhVOLq82tPGwcMCvnYrhr2ag1pSEMNp6Ti+JmwGYG JVAxeF2yQgT7Sm/neJr6DOaxx8sp2NrRgpugI2daUG8Bde5CsHB6216FTKmvU51+KXO+ aHJ3cKCXPzE599JBL+y8wb7oMYKnTydKCmtO8i0ni6jpvKiyXcmcDH/NX3l1HghAH6xY RVK3uIjC/7CPnhp2Ot6Zu9KgrnBe5kODMlDEsiZHphsMNDGs9KuTxZ1wQ/ziC+KKsh9h 4ylQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.136.231 with SMTP id qd7mr4894083pbb.28.1331759435684; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:10:35 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.143.33.5 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:10:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:10:35 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9-OwfOCDaJE-cHRB1yPWhY7VhOE Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Gabor Kovesdan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Oleg Moskalenko , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:10:36 -0000 On 14 March 2012 08:59, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since the > OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was hard to modify. > The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg Moskalenko > showed interest in continuing this version and > he has made a very good job on this BSD sort variant. Now it is compatible > with the base version of GNU sort but the performance in most cases (string > sort and -n) is quite behind GNU sort (although with -g it is about *4 > times* faster). Oleg is still working on optimizing the code and the > long-term plan is to drop GNU sort once this variant is good enough to > replace it. For now, it is only available in Ports Collection as > textproc/bsdsort but if there is no objection or any serious bug report I > plan to add it to base installed as bsdsort, being GNU sort still the > default sort until it proves that we can safely drop GNU sort. If you are > interested in this sort utility, could you please try the port and report us > any issue that you experience? Hi, This makes me think of the whole debian-y way of replacing the mailer programs using some magic alias program. So you could intall gnusort, bsdsort, and then some config file would determine which was used. 'sort' would then be a symlink to said magic program, that'd look at its argv[0], look at the contents of that file, and exec() the right one. Would that be helpful herE? Adrian From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 21:38:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFC6106566C; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:38:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B658FC12; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl9 with SMTP id l9so2848836yen.13 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:38:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=6EGbgSX1UOcQK0rV/wKfHufPgWbu4kBG8w8vj4AxiIM=; b=GBrVv5cPFPDxpVWDaqEt3aZ2rJTUWissm7pNc4/q7XpuQsZHyEU5ojIUJuQ08Gqo89 pq5C5LpYWsNDtKOzFuewl3zqgQdt5rKAms5e7C9kGYQD8Uv3/Vsi7iZThZmHyatIYF5C VjhI1L6x6X2bpij6/EiUhHsl9z2wLg8D/mqdzp1vQioO3pfL0WKpANMTG7LH/BJxkZAT 40/BCZAt6AUo6e/0JCuHqOczLDwR4aPS5bIC2c+eeYBRIfX+sZUZLWxgzeKuruZns9LX ZzzIQjy1Lz1Jh3e83Sh0yvMuPyZthREkcfpIcn6rO6PryuYekOP5ezMXwmJRt1ZePBAj a+jg== Received: by 10.50.184.228 with SMTP id ex4mr7109899igc.50.1331761132524; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:38:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from luna.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com. [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ub10sm15138655igb.7.2012.03.14.14.38.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:38:51 -0700 (PDT) From: ajtiM To: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:38:38 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-RELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; i386; ; ) References: <201203140544.36233.lumiwa@gmail.com> <20120314110647.GB33863@oldfaithful.bebik.local> <20120314125757.GB73451@azathoth.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120314125757.GB73451@azathoth.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201203141638.38717.lumiwa@gmail.com> Cc: Rodrigo OSORIO , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libreoffice X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:38:54 -0000 On Wednesday 14 March 2012 07:57:58 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:06:47PM +0100, Rodrigo OSORIO wrote: > > On 14/03/12 05:44 -0500, ajtiM wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > I just wondering if is Libreoffice still maintained or is just > > > OpenOffice maintained? I used on my wife Mageia Linux notebook > > > LibreOffice 3.5.2 and has many improvemnts compare with 3.4 which we > > > have in ports. > > > > > > Thank. > > > > > > Mitja > > > -------- > > > http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > Hi, > > > > In a post here[1] bapt@ gives some informations about the libreoffice > > status in ports and the incomming improvements. A jump to 3.5.1 is > > expected as soon as this version will be available. > > > > regards, > > Rodrigo > > > > [1] http://lists.pcbsd.org/pipermail/pbi-dev/2012-March/001699.html > > Btw libreoffice 3.5.2 doesn't exist yet, the next version if 3.5.1 (and as > just been released) btw porting libreoffice 3.5 is still not finished. > > regards, > Bapt Thank you ta everyone... 3.5.2 was mistyping. For Linux is recomandation for source 3.5.1 which I have. Mitja -------- http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 00:54:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B986106566B for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:54:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from code@apotheon.net) Received: from oproxy5-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy5.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 338CB8FC0C for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:54:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2073 invoked by uid 0); 15 Mar 2012 00:54:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 15 Mar 2012 00:54:54 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apotheon.net; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=OtQap7E5h7vPaxA32o8ycSB9A65gOvpB+YD2q9jjxvQ=; b=vXjolF/wUeRPo/gKla3GKN9XqBFiDDamCrDOyykz22NBQ3osCJ9T/oPFgpJrJQSaDq+IDd9jTJuUWXVWfIULxm+ThCO/ISijHYYKmULXnwWhCWdSSbs1mAwyY5PeCJUB; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=localhost) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S7yxy-00069o-3I for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:54:54 -0600 Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:54:50 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120315005450.GB20239@hemlock.hydra> References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.net} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with code@apotheon.net} Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:54:55 -0000 On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 04:59:21PM +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > > some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch > since the OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was > hard to modify. The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg > Moskalenko showed interest in > continuing this version and he has made a very good job on this BSD > sort variant. Now it is compatible with the base version of GNU sort > but the performance in most cases (string sort and -n) is quite > behind GNU sort (although with -g it is about *4 times* faster). > Oleg is still working on optimizing the code and the long-term plan > is to drop GNU sort once this variant is good enough to replace it. > For now, it is only available in Ports Collection as > textproc/bsdsort but if there is no objection or any serious bug > report I plan to add it to base installed as bsdsort, being GNU sort > still the default sort until it proves that we can safely drop GNU > sort. If you are interested in this sort utility, could you please > try the port and report us any issue that you experience? I meant to send this email yesterday. It's on Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/CopyfreeNews/status/179985533911576576 I'll be testing the bsdsort for my own purposes, and report back if I have any problems. Thanks for the hard work! -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 01:02:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A175106564A; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:02:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from superbisquit@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com (mail-pz0-f45.google.com [209.85.210.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476108FC0A; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:02:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadp14 with SMTP id p14so10391604dad.18 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:02:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5mUdU68FiGKZDnRvtqP41hLJCj91oUOCFJuELFq3jj8=; b=ntQE/2d40l/Vo/tmtQyBIfl8YPP7lHnIeVDKqt//StrWOBrBrvj+oKc9TVBR+7Qsc6 qC0ktWtR9N+I1p5hJQtKxemeFr/g6FjzgqlNaHMeVlLmSJF3vRct0QzkuADVJcbOXuzw oUXVQU352/MO1PLgtJJ8g8IwtFLAI1ZSEjVPDk7l9TAmYkg81rmq3S1FZNUdLTP2CMX2 baxsD7duVECgaL8tVurV7+NhqjPByc7ogjUNZBpAz/X7jQrJYFhGXfCDiQLzwe1o2QaL TVVM5bRhQC5d9UXiKsDq8bn6xRTGSEkvPsae46K15V4AZxs1ZshKnQQkS//+3YOD+reR cMgA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.132.41 with SMTP id or9mr550335pbb.8.1331773342845; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:02:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.208.168 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:02:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201203141424.q2EEOwIq058548@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201203141424.q2EEOwIq058548@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:02:22 -0400 Message-ID: From: Super Bisquit To: scheidell@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/166058: New port sysutils/py-XenAPI X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:02:23 -0000 Be sure to let people know that it is for powerpc64 only. The hypervisor was not present in powerpc 32bit cpus. On 3/14/12, scheidell@freebsd.org wrote: > Synopsis: New port sysutils/py-XenAPI > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->freebsd-ports-bugs > Responsible-Changed-By: scheidell > Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 14 14:24:58 UTC 2012 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > Its freebsd-ports-bugs. Thanks. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166058 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 01:04:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6C31065673; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:04:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan.robert.anderson@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698F18FC12; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhj6 with SMTP id hj6so6579762wib.13 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:04:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.99.100 with SMTP id ep4mr11089683wib.7.1331773441423; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:04:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from joe.jonandchrissy?.ca ([85.210.163.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l5sm873700wia.11.2012.03.14.18.03.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:04:00 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) From: Jonathan Anderson In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:14:28 +0000 Message-Id: References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> To: Adrian Chadd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Gabor Kovesdan , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Oleg Moskalenko Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:04:03 -0000 On 14 Mar 2012, at 21:10, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi, >=20 > This makes me think of the whole debian-y way of replacing the mailer > programs using some magic alias program. >=20 > So you could intall gnusort, bsdsort, and then some config file would > determine which was used. >=20 > 'sort' would then be a symlink to said magic program, that'd look at > its argv[0], look at the contents of that file, and exec() the right > one. In fact, the runtime behaviour of the Debian "alternatives" system is = simpler than that: http://segfault.in/2010/04/using-the-debian-alternatives-system/ The custom Perl script with a config file is used to set up symlinks, = which at runtime are... well, just symlinks. For instance, /usr/bin/vim = is a symlink to /etc/alternatives/vim, which is itself a symlink to a = binary like vim.gtk (example shamelessly stolen from the linked page, = since I no longer have any Debian boxes to check for myself on :). No = magic binaries or argv[0] fu. In one way, it's an elegant solution. On the other, it's a classic = example of Wheeler's Law in action. :) Jon -- Jonathan Anderson Research Student, Security Group Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge +44 (1223) 763747 jonathan.anderson@cl.cam.ac.uk= From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 01:19:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E914106566C; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:19:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oleg.moskalenko@citrix.com) Received: from SMTP02.CITRIX.COM (smtp02.citrix.com [66.165.176.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B248FC1B; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:19:43 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,587,1325480400"; d="scan'208,217";a="186006432" Received: from sjcpmailmx02.citrite.net ([10.216.14.75]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 14 Mar 2012 21:19:37 -0400 Received: from SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net ([10.216.4.73]) by SJCPMAILMX02.citrite.net ([10.216.14.75]) with mapi; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:19:36 -0700 From: Oleg Moskalenko To: 'Jonathan Anderson' , Adrian Chadd Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:19:35 -0700 Thread-Topic: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available Thread-Index: Ac0CR4QCJ+mkrdXrTzOakoM5BzhhCQAAbabw Message-ID: <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2A3@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" , Gabor Kovesdan , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:19:44 -0000 This is true, debians do the symlinks trick. In Ubuntu : /usr/bin/java -> /etc/alternatives/java /etc/alternatives/java - >/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/bin/java Oleg From: Jonathan Anderson [mailto:jonathan.anderson@cl.cam.ac.uk] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 3:14 PM To: Adrian Chadd Cc: Gabor Kovesdan; freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Oleg Moskalenko; freebsd-p= orts@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available On 14 Mar 2012, at 21:10, Adrian Chadd wrote: Hi, This makes me think of the whole debian-y way of replacing the mailer programs using some magic alias program. So you could intall gnusort, bsdsort, and then some config file would determine which was used. 'sort' would then be a symlink to said magic program, that'd look at its argv[0], look at the contents of that file, and exec() the right one. In fact, the runtime behaviour of the Debian "alternatives" system is simpl= er than that: http://segfault.in/2010/04/using-the-debian-alternatives-system/ The custom Perl script with a config file is used to set up symlinks, which= at runtime are... well, just symlinks. For instance, /usr/bin/vim is a sym= link to /etc/alternatives/vim, which is itself a symlink to a binary like v= im.gtk (example shamelessly stolen from the linked page, since I no longer = have any Debian boxes to check for myself on :). No magic binaries or argv[= 0] fu. In one way, it's an elegant solution. On the other, it's a classic example = of Wheeler's Law in action. :) Jon -- Jonathan Anderson Research Student, Security Group Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge +44 (1223) 763747 jonathan.anderson@cl.cam.ac.uk From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 01:26:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACBE106566B; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:26:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com (mail-pz0-f45.google.com [209.85.210.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912BA8FC1E; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:26:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadp14 with SMTP id p14so10488428dad.18 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:26:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=G88ACyOJl3FZ3Me6oFoKO9+bOl6JhQjTLT2Nte91vls=; b=0XyFspvbYH8gtg208yQtAxR/5NAVw3HEBncVhVToUP4xQD0miCUvAZBrdgCykpinPM v+OCSOIvwqcI8Y9cm+/iFYQrqdlHZnd14v4l1BV58wPVzQu1srzKdmd3rwOq07dJ3/rH NmETCrExljXrzaWN0BXumf17zUAm+xa6MqouUqvgAoLL56+wwPommUfyiuLQtp65g9PT Kst3upVO18+pRydHEOHIai3Bs8YLzYwJxjbXxAG8F5KtCRsS3Eg0fNpRguTYlXdmF5nS 5IX3WThF8Ttwua7BW/U+VW44tmEfC5BCLQBd2zulZ2JiXI8nhiyM6pyjDVLiyGqdV1/G j5NA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.225.104 with SMTP id rj8mr442439pbc.135.1331774783239; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:26:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.143.33.5 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:26:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2A3@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2A3@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:26:23 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WKgsOATIXM1ZkpMg2acyQ9QEXrs Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Oleg Moskalenko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Jonathan Anderson , Gabor Kovesdan , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:26:23 -0000 I must be thinking of our mailer trick then? I know i've seen it somewhere before. Alternatives sounds fun though? ADrian From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 01:34:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4207D106566B for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:34:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwinlculp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97028FC12 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:34:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so2378788bkc.13 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:34:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jbvg3ixnbRPlB+n64A0Di+MGR6a5IsHGLo/abpfipHM=; b=UmX/hkgVTHyh3csxrEggVbISnG8j5sxpp23zOkv6ReTdQrww+JLpejJPdTp+o3hFzH pQ+iViFidTJm/tdVb1ik0gG1gtKsBCqDovVIrQp1GjhTQQ13xYjYpb1WXtMOwCWb2C6E 5IFfxmGJ40OhxsTx4hjTEof0q6RjPSfzh/DAT5y4ufodj5U+L+y9Dqsf+1YHyBLaowGQ 0vQ3dbXcL3oq8N9errSBV/Noy9R9HByuwLDzaWV662efM1W8jXxAf8afrBxZfG5K5cF/ Ffod4JFkPswoYJ0oLlidqQkydLfEZClfI0WY0bV2Fq6DFEzb9MqqcbXhn3WUSXOTZCdb aR/g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.156.206 with SMTP id y14mr1831195bkw.14.1331775283840; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:34:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.123.79 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:34:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:34:43 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Edwin L. Culp W." To: freebsd-ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: skype-devel-2.2.0.35 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:34:45 -0000 I am running 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #89 r229960M: Mon Mar 12 05:11:09 CST 2012 amd64. I am not a big skype user but the last couple of weeks it hasn't worked and I've actually enjoyed the silence;) but someday I need to get it going. World and all ports are up to date and the skype configuration that may be different than default Video support not checked Audio is oss on all The rest should be the same. When I try to call I get an immediate call failed. Messages don't go through and I never see a user on line. It almost seems like it isn't connected but I don't see how. I also tried going back to the 2.1.0.81 version and the same problem. This must be something DUMB that I have done but . . . . . Thanks for any suggestions, ed From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 07:17:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BF3106564A for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 07:17:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from magik@roorback.net) Received: from roorback.net (ec2-50-17-44-204.compute-1.amazonaws.com [50.17.44.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997158FC14 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 07:17:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.1.1.66] (unknown [157.25.200.146]) by roorback.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5EB9D22804; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:12:21 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F619653.3080103@roorback.net> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:12:19 +0100 From: Grzegorz Blach User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120130 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cy Schubert References: <201203142001.q2EK1kre039910@slippy.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: <201203142001.q2EK1kre039910@slippy.cwsent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mel Flynn , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: security/openssh-portable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 07:17:46 -0000 On 03/14/2012 09:01 PM, Cy Schubert wrote: > In message<4F60EF46.2040405@acsalaska.net>, Mel Flynn writes: >> Hello Cy, >> >> On 3/14/2012 08:57, Cy Schubert wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>> What I propose to do is remove the GSSAPI >>> patch from security/openssh-portable and for those who need the GSSAPI >>> server key exchange, create a new port (through a repocopy of course) which >> >>> includes the illinois.edu GSI patch with reworked FreeBSD patches resolving >> >>> patch conflicts, calling it security/openssh-portable-gsi. Does this make >>> any sense to anyone? >>> >>> Or, instead of the above, just include the GSI patch by default in a >>> one-size-fits-all openssh-portable port? (Meaning that the GSI patch is >>> applied regardless.) Does this make more sense to people? >> >> Personally, I use HPN and LPK. If KRB5 becomes a requirement for HPN, I >> don't find that an issue, but others may. > > Given that the current LPK patch is unmaintained by our upstream, I think > it should be removed and we either move toward a one size fits all port or > have a second port with the one-size-fits-all GSI patch. Basically the > current hodgepodge of patches in this port are unmaintainable, which is why > this port is usually slow to be updated. > > We can address the KRB5 requirement with an ifdefs. > > I'm leaning toward gutting a one-size-fits-all approach with patches that > are maintainable. Secondly, if there are requirements for an insecure > backlevel port, we could repocopy it. I'm not entirely enamoured with that > idea, caveat emptor of course. > >> >> I'm also keeping a local fix you might want to properly integrate into >> the LPK patch: it fixes a bug that TLS cannot be turned off if >> LPKLdapConf is used. > > If I go ahead and have the port repocopied and move forward with this, I'll > see if I can include this patch. > > I'll give it another day before making the repocopy request. The current > port should be repocopied to openssh-portable58 and the new port assume the > openssh-portable name. > > I've yet to hear from the maintainer of this port for his thoughts on this. > > I (maintainer of security/openssh-portable) need one or two days to review GSI patch and other patches which are available for openssh-5.9. But repocopy security/openssh-portable to security/openssh-portable58 and upgrade security/openssh-portable to 5.9 sound reasonable. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 08:13:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A56106566C for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:13:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au) Received: from nskntmtas06p.mx.bigpond.com (nskntmtas06p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.168.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6434E8FC0C for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:13:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nskntcmgw05p ([61.9.169.165]) by nskntmtas06p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20120315081302.NUHM10884.nskntmtas06p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntcmgw05p>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:13:02 +0000 Received: from hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au ([58.172.112.105]) by nskntcmgw05p with BigPond Outbound id lkD01i0042GVmci01kD0RN; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:13:02 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=OYIa/2vY c=1 sm=1 a=0GO/22z+lHYfckWJ4naYnw==:17 a=twTT4oUKOlYA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=UIxaDq86FqtBmL3qBkQA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=0GO/22z+lHYfckWJ4naYnw==:117 Received: from white (white.hs [10.0.5.2]) by hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au (8.14.5/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q2F8BLAC090742 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:11:23 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au) From: "Dewayne Geraghty" To: "'Cy Schubert'" , , References: <201203140757.q2E7vk8L071546@slippy.cwsent.com> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:11:21 +1100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <201203140757.q2E7vk8L071546@slippy.cwsent.com> Thread-Index: Ac0BuEUw/h+3pyxBQEOfq0Fui5zDtwAyXwaw X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Cc: Subject: RE: security/openssh-portable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:13:03 -0000 Cy, If the option of splitting openssh into two ports means that one of those ports is closer to the base system's openssh, and the base system's openssh requires the FreeBSD patch-set, for base, then this is a commendable suggestion. Otherwise, I would vote for one kit, subject of course to Grzegorz' nod. Like Mel, I enjoy the benefit of HPN and keys only. Kind regards, Dewayne. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 09:11:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8AC106566B for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from magik@roorback.net) Received: from fbsdmon.org (194-28-50-218.arpa.teredo.pl [194.28.50.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF728FC14 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.1.1.66] (unknown [157.25.200.146]) by roorback.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A59B610954CC for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:03:54 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F61B06F.3090003@roorback.net> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:03:43 +0100 From: Grzegorz Blach User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120130 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <201203142001.q2EK1kre039910@slippy.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: <201203142001.q2EK1kre039910@slippy.cwsent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: security/openssh-portable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:11:34 -0000 I (maintainer of security/openssh-portable) need one or two days to review GSI patch and other patches which are available for openssh-5.9. But repocopy security/openssh-portable to security/openssh-portable58 and upgrade security/openssh-portable to 5.9 sound reasonable for me. Beginning from FreeBSD 9.0 openssh in base system has applied HPN patches, so I think it isn't a good idea to maintain port which is very close to system's openssh. In this case simply use openssh from base system. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 12:37:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2A6106564A for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:37:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8468FC0C for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A0ED23C1B for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:37:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 348C7D23C04 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:37:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from MikeBook-Air.local (10.80.0.4) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:37:36 -0400 Message-ID: <4F61E28F.9060407@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:37:35 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Quick compile test,new port? sparc64, ppc, ia64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:37:38 -0000 Just put in a nice new port, dns/knot (as in NOT bind ... I think). authoritative ONLY dns server. looks nice. I have I386 and AMD64 tinderboxes, and am looking to see if this compiles on sparc64, ppc, and or ia64. (vendor README mentions special flags and configuration args for 'WITH_X86_64' which autoconf seems to have taken care of) I don't need to know if it works yet, just looking to see if it compiles. I have left the PR open for comments till Saturday. (will sparc64 compile a port by Saturday ;-)? If I have any failures, I'll update port with (not for arch? only for arch? if arch broken?), Ill make that decision Saturday. Thanks. (post results as followup to pr please) -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 13:26:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9769C106566B; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:26:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kazuaki@aliceblue.jp) Received: from p024afb.tokyff01.ap.so-net.ne.jp (p024afb.tokyff01.ap.so-net.ne.jp [121.2.74.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553648FC0C; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:26:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from undine.local (unknown [192.168.11.46]) by p024afb.tokyff01.ap.so-net.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43580193DC7; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:18:07 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <4F61EC0E.8060809@aliceblue.jp> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:18:06 +0900 From: Kazuaki ODA User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gabor Kovesdan References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Oleg Moskalenko , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:26:30 -0000 (12/03/15 0:59), Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > Hi Folks, > > some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since > the OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was hard to > modify. The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg Moskalenko > showed interest in continuing this version > and he has made a very good job on this BSD sort variant. Now it is > compatible with the base version of GNU sort but the performance in most > cases (string sort and -n) is quite behind GNU sort (although with -g it > is about *4 times* faster). Oleg is still working on optimizing the code > and the long-term plan is to drop GNU sort once this variant is good > enough to replace it. For now, it is only available in Ports Collection > as textproc/bsdsort but if there is no objection or any serious bug > report I plan to add it to base installed as bsdsort, being GNU sort > still the default sort until it proves that we can safely drop GNU sort. > If you are interested in this sort utility, could you please try the > port and report us any issue that you experience? > > Thanks in advance, > Gabor > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" bsdsort is one of my long awaiting ports. Because GNU sort has a numeric sort bug in some multi-byte locales. For example, ls -l /usr/bin | env LANG=en_US.UTF-8 sort -n -k 5 (we expect the result is sorted by file size.) shows invalid result. bsdsort does not has such a bug, so I hope our base system will include bsdsort in the near future. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 15:12:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE581065673 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:12:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from code@apotheon.net) Received: from oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy7.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BE918FC16 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:12:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2483 invoked by uid 0); 15 Mar 2012 15:12:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by oproxy7.bluehost.com with SMTP; 15 Mar 2012 15:12:08 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apotheon.net; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=vPtVuTyfRlz2mqynpfeGalmKdBgn1U5Gv88Gpp0Xb44=; b=AUyW12+Rid/C9SFRNs1uIzLB0OvWak3QZ9b1bbnuqblD5IiJhM25aTPxhufIBmT2vFGYesMiTn6LWrbEg2riJv8tmVVFfkMCC6Yirgro2CdNRFoGe2cPhAxenCbKUeTR; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=localhost) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S8CLY-0002Kq-6g for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:12:08 -0600 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:12:08 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120315151208.GA28534@hemlock.hydra> References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.net} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with code@apotheon.net} Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:12:09 -0000 On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:14:28PM +0000, Jonathan Anderson wrote: > > In fact, the runtime behaviour of the Debian "alternatives" system is simpler than that: > http://segfault.in/2010/04/using-the-debian-alternatives-system/ > > The custom Perl script with a config file is used to set up symlinks, > which at runtime are... well, just symlinks. For instance, /usr/bin/vim > is a symlink to /etc/alternatives/vim, which is itself a symlink to a > binary like vim.gtk (example shamelessly stolen from the linked page, > since I no longer have any Debian boxes to check for myself on :). No > magic binaries or argv[0] fu. > > In one way, it's an elegant solution. On the other, it's a classic > example of Wheeler's Law in action. :) I'm peripherally aware of at least three different things known to at least someone as Wheeler's Law. The only Wheeler's Law that comes to mind as being relevant here is Wheeler's Law of Hype (which, ironically, applies to itself to reduce the measure its own importance and significance to one quarter according to how Andrew Wheeler stated the law, but to one half according to his examples): Each adjective reduces, by half, the importance and significance of a blurb or award description. Is that the Wheeler's Law you mean? -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 16:28:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9103106566B for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:28:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751768FC08 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1S8DXT-0002K7-BB; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:28:31 +0100 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:28:31 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Mark Felder Message-ID: <20120315162831.GQ44287@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: p0f v3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:28:33 -0000 Hi! > Is anyone working on a port of p0f v3? It is much more accurate at > detecting newer OSes. I have seen emails from 2008R2 servers get higher > than normal SpamAssassin scores because it thought they were Windows XP, > which is causing spam filter accuracy issues. > > I think this would be a great benefit to everyone. The current p0f port > does not have a maintainer. As I've read your mail, I had a look at p0f 3. It looks doable. I'll give it a try. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 8 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 18:02:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F84A106566C for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:02:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC36E8FC17 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:02:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=6I4wfNbHuf3UaWmYLLvxYVTljxr8KbdT3CQlNykWuzQ=; b=NDhpXKBF4QeDBHVpnQ6dbisEAnZG4kd7ZiexSGmslg9hjCgKq+ZBmOS2SMalHNLBE7Yp9IFQApGYAOApcPewEq6FLKLl3CzGf63zetBqa0DDREIpKp1ogOgdyO0pX8mm; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1S8F0E-000Gym-9x for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:02:19 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpsa id 1331834532-34990-34989/5/30; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:02:12 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20120315162831.GQ44287@home.opsec.eu> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:02:12 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20120315162831.GQ44287@home.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.62 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: p0f v3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:02:21 -0000 On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:28:31 -0500, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > As I've read your mail, I had a look at p0f 3. It looks doable. I've been busy and didn't have a chance to reply earlier -- I look forward to your work. I am preparing a test environment soon so I can push some emails through one of our filters with an updated p0f port. If I don't get to the port before you I would be able to at least test it. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 19:43:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D846106566C for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:43:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27E98FC1C for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.41]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3084A71525 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:18:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 8789 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2012 19:18:13 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 22354, pid: 20847, t: 0.1619s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Mar 2012 19:18:12 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2308533C32; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:18:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id D139C39860; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:18:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Gabor Kovesdan References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:18:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> (Gabor Kovesdan's message of "Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:59:21 +0100") Message-ID: <44pqcd8yhd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Oleg Moskalenko , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:43:18 -0000 Gabor Kovesdan writes: > some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since > the OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was hard to > modify. The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg > Moskalenko showed interest in continuing > this version and he has made a very good job on this BSD sort > variant. Now it is compatible with the base version of GNU sort but > the performance in most cases (string sort and -n) is quite behind GNU > sort (although with -g it is about *4 times* faster). Oleg is still > working on optimizing the code and the long-term plan is to drop GNU > sort once this variant is good enough to replace it. For now, it is > only available in Ports Collection as textproc/bsdsort but if there is > no objection or any serious bug report I plan to add it to base > installed as bsdsort, being GNU sort still the default sort until it > proves that we can safely drop GNU sort. If you are interested in this > sort utility, could you please try the port and report us any issue > that you experience? portsdb(1) (from portupgrade) doesn't seem to like it; apparently it is missing a '-2' option, which I haven't tracked down yet... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 19:50:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D66B106564A; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:50:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BF28FC19; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so5795731iah.13 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:50:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SF0uxS62uF6pgtRmNKQMRRiCjzU5efeFPTRBtf7MqFs=; b=Cr5alB+rHJPwZZkbkDOxb3fALalrFHPglBVBvIcLZN481d7cySfatzBuB4Xh0gJzcw GPAk2GpOXXMX5uEAx+xiT1VKUZsv785zIhCbImlqlZcX6g09Dpdpg3UZgtd5KeoiVGti Tmfy3XkeCRAPn55Zi2PIQg2k+TSbIBPiV8JgKf6rmljKqW+I3BZ8Q122CXxX/pEeThiA ckM7QwFAN+SZpkRONO1pWW9XZwx6mbrZlmJuQzt0LSSCpDng3FjLRo6r7iKWF2sISpGc sxMdDo9mc7lgIfGaTa65UeOEAAIcS1rJsPqExYWrK/50IB3gwGTRRxnwKYLBML9VAoyZ JMpA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.147.67 with SMTP id m3mr9510664icv.34.1331841047410; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:50:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.217.202 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:50:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:50:47 -0500 Message-ID: From: Jeremy Messenger To: lua@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List Subject: lang/lua: It does need gmake. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:50:48 -0000 I get a build failure on amd64: --------------------------------- /usr/bin/ld: lapi.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `luaO_nilobject_' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC lapi.o: could not read symbols: Bad value *** Error code 1 --------------------------------- I got it fixed by add USE_GMAKE=yes in the Makefile and now I can get it built ok. If you compare the build log between make and gmake. You will see it has different output. This http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/162279 has broken it. May I commit it by add USE_GMAKE=yes back in? Thanks, Mezz -- mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 19:53:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14EF106566B; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:53:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272DC8FC14; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:53:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so3306077bkc.13 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:53:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=Vg/xjY7wpZve6gNEpApnyp3xLzWJq7A70x7ErdACMSM=; b=TUT3HCSfaC4i98t2B8lBLgsbPcQFoEWbd5qJ2BFMVtThyXp2nd3qWMWLD1sGAD/uKI N5dasDj7nnBzUzwHRGjy9MkpbHdQETOxPFEGAgy3mUb5MTCbpKDm+o9VCOu6g7e3RcxY KUNbfuk8S3eLwSuXVf5HXoERsuWPu2e2giiHCKyum7inAvBR2aWeDaiIGFFbfhpJXOsX CWOUZh0hBb4nbTQIXSHq29MoDkUEmawELKWrCNVc+3jNgd1SW2cjLWC47bhYLZyATtLr rK0ZPtjq0vDe+XwKIZRPiiJe7rfyGdhSwgqi/caxGF5T6hyNojMfV2k8XZnDbtX6K7OQ 8RtQ== Received: by 10.205.137.15 with SMTP id im15mr2982048bkc.54.1331841230019; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:53:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:50:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <44pqcd8yhd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <44pqcd8yhd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> From: Chris Rees Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:50:29 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: YaqJnyCjORacH-8TbzYcQx7FNdw Message-ID: To: Lowell Gilbert Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Oleg Moskalenko , Gabor Kovesdan , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:53:51 -0000 On 15 March 2012 19:18, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Gabor Kovesdan writes: > >> some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since >> the OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was hard to >> modify. The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg >> Moskalenko showed interest in continuing >> this version and he has made a very good job on this BSD sort >> variant. Now it is compatible with the base version of GNU sort but >> the performance in most cases (string sort and -n) is quite behind GNU >> sort (although with -g it is about *4 times* faster). Oleg is still >> working on optimizing the code and the long-term plan is to drop GNU >> sort once this variant is good enough to replace it. For now, it is >> only available in Ports Collection as textproc/bsdsort but if there is >> no objection or any serious bug report I plan to add it to base >> installed as bsdsort, being GNU sort still the default sort until it >> proves that we can safely drop GNU sort. If you are interested in this >> sort utility, could you please try the port and report us any issue >> that you experience? > > portsdb(1) (from portupgrade) doesn't seem to like it; > apparently it is missing a '-2' option, which I haven't > tracked down yet... Fails with gnusort too anyway: [crees@pegasus]~% gsort -2 gsort: invalid option -- '2' Try `gsort --help' for more information. [crees@pegasus]~% Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 20:24:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BA91065670 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:24:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwidger@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC958FC17 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:24:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl9 with SMTP id l9so4238782yen.13 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:24:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SpMcm9m1Xzz8da3iXp8Sb+RFop/E8SdMhGsbw4+tKDQ=; b=vwmeXt7JWsCE39eQOtbVV8dlji2c5H0PVG6AT07BMrPXaW959DB0A5e8dJhA7hrU5s KHoqhedEpgqTZl/08GSRvHsUKmLs88R0YjjO3aVGCWlUp0uGnH8wGs1e7baafCvUw73o mz0PUNysf3e8esGKTB0DhCt+41hOW9bWexYyiQGq4BM5jLvWbAtFPs/N3b7GzQNMId/z dR7iDloqbzcfWWlLNcpRey/XnqJy956bQCUnEhHS894G8759AwuooRhkcyf6ak7i4ux3 wWEILVfGXHDf7i1W+JZQa+xkISONpf6vBKPpMGP6fO+Hk0cCUNUl3RFTOLi7EUDvp7Wy T7Uw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.187.2 with SMTP id cu2mr598329qab.88.1331843086131; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:24:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.77.7 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:24:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:24:45 -0700 Message-ID: From: Chris Widger To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Swatch rc script X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:24:47 -0000 There's a bug in the rc script for /usr/ports/securit/swatch With the bug swatch can be started, but getting status or stopping the process' always fail. To fix this bug I had to change: procname=/usr/local/bin/perl to: procname=/usr/local/bin/swatch With this change all instances of swatch start, stop, and report status correctly. thanks, -Chris Widger From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 20:29:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A602106566B; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:29:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oleg.moskalenko@citrix.com) Received: from SMTP.CITRIX.COM (smtp.citrix.com [66.165.176.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6ECB8FC0C; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:29:49 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,593,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="23124632" Received: from sjcpmailmx02.citrite.net ([10.216.14.75]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 15 Mar 2012 16:29:49 -0400 Received: from SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net ([10.216.4.73]) by SJCPMAILMX02.citrite.net ([10.216.14.75]) with mapi; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:29:48 -0700 From: Oleg Moskalenko To: 'Chris Rees' , Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:29:48 -0700 Thread-Topic: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available Thread-Index: Ac0C5WG2n0gTQCqsRxySUIRRiXml2gABKq6Q Message-ID: <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2A6@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <44pqcd8yhd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Gabor Kovesdan , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:29:51 -0000 There is no option "-2" in the new BSD sort or in the GNU sort. There is no= such option in Posix standard, too. What is this option about, do we need to add something ? Thanks Oleg -----Original Message----- From: utisoft@gmail.com [mailto:utisoft@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Chris Rees Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:50 PM To: Lowell Gilbert Cc: Gabor Kovesdan; Oleg Moskalenko; freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available On 15 March 2012 19:18, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Gabor Kovesdan writes: > >> some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since >> the OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was hard to >> modify. The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg >> Moskalenko showed interest in continuing >> this version and he has made a very good job on this BSD sort >> variant. Now it is compatible with the base version of GNU sort but >> the performance in most cases (string sort and -n) is quite behind GNU >> sort (although with -g it is about *4 times* faster). Oleg is still >> working on optimizing the code and the long-term plan is to drop GNU >> sort once this variant is good enough to replace it. For now, it is >> only available in Ports Collection as textproc/bsdsort but if there is >> no objection or any serious bug report I plan to add it to base >> installed as bsdsort, being GNU sort still the default sort until it >> proves that we can safely drop GNU sort. If you are interested in this >> sort utility, could you please try the port and report us any issue >> that you experience? > > portsdb(1) (from portupgrade) doesn't seem to like it; > apparently it is missing a '-2' option, which I haven't > tracked down yet... Fails with gnusort too anyway: [crees@pegasus]~% gsort -2 gsort: invalid option -- '2' Try `gsort --help' for more information. [crees@pegasus]~% Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 20:29:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0671065674 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:29:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A108FC14 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:29:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977F8D23D4F; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:29:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BC5CD23C84; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:29:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from macintosh.secnap.com (10.70.3.3) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:29:51 -0400 Message-ID: <4F62513F.7090708@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:29:51 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: , References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Swatch rc script X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:29:53 -0000 On 3/15/12 4:24 PM, Chris Widger wrote: > There's a bug in the rc script for /usr/ports/securit/swatch > > With the bug swatch can be started, but getting status or stopping the > process' always fail. > > To fix this bug I had to change: > > procname=/usr/local/bin/perl > > to: > > procname=/usr/local/bin/swatch > > With this change all instances of swatch start, stop, and report status > correctly. no, don't do that. look at all the patches to and from, back and forth, if you patch it yourself, some of your installation will work, others won't. to to freebsd.org, support, search bug reports, single line, 'swatch', include closed reports. procname depends on the size of your cmd_arg, maybe the os version, maybe the arch. Depending on these, procname needs to be one or the other. What is your version of rc file? # $FreeBSD: ports/security/swatch/files/swatch.in,v 1.7 2012/01/14 08:56:53 dougb Exp $ -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 20:33:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674EC106566B; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:33:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oleg.moskalenko@citrix.com) Received: from SMTP.CITRIX.COM (smtp.citrix.com [66.165.176.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC67A8FC12; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:33:09 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,593,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="23124759" Received: from sjcpmailmx02.citrite.net ([10.216.14.75]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 15 Mar 2012 16:33:08 -0400 Received: from SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net ([10.216.4.73]) by SJCPMAILMX02.citrite.net ([10.216.14.75]) with mapi; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:33:08 -0700 From: Oleg Moskalenko To: Oleg Moskalenko , 'Chris Rees' , 'Lowell Gilbert' Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:33:07 -0700 Thread-Topic: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available Thread-Index: Ac0C5WG2n0gTQCqsRxySUIRRiXml2gABKq6QAAAp2XA= Message-ID: <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2A7@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <44pqcd8yhd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2A6@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> In-Reply-To: <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2A6@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: 'Gabor Kovesdan' , "'freebsd-ports@freebsd.org'" Subject: RE: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:33:10 -0000 In the "old" BSD sort, originated from OpenBSD, there was no -2 option, as = far as I can see. Oleg -----Original Message----- From: Oleg Moskalenko=20 Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 1:30 PM To: 'Chris Rees'; Lowell Gilbert Cc: Gabor Kovesdan; freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: RE: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available There is no option "-2" in the new BSD sort or in the GNU sort. There is no= such option in Posix standard, too. What is this option about, do we need to add something ? Thanks Oleg -----Original Message----- From: utisoft@gmail.com [mailto:utisoft@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Chris Rees Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:50 PM To: Lowell Gilbert Cc: Gabor Kovesdan; Oleg Moskalenko; freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available On 15 March 2012 19:18, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Gabor Kovesdan writes: > >> some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since >> the OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was hard to >> modify. The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg >> Moskalenko showed interest in continuing >> this version and he has made a very good job on this BSD sort >> variant. Now it is compatible with the base version of GNU sort but >> the performance in most cases (string sort and -n) is quite behind GNU >> sort (although with -g it is about *4 times* faster). Oleg is still >> working on optimizing the code and the long-term plan is to drop GNU >> sort once this variant is good enough to replace it. For now, it is >> only available in Ports Collection as textproc/bsdsort but if there is >> no objection or any serious bug report I plan to add it to base >> installed as bsdsort, being GNU sort still the default sort until it >> proves that we can safely drop GNU sort. If you are interested in this >> sort utility, could you please try the port and report us any issue >> that you experience? > > portsdb(1) (from portupgrade) doesn't seem to like it; > apparently it is missing a '-2' option, which I haven't > tracked down yet... Fails with gnusort too anyway: [crees@pegasus]~% gsort -2 gsort: invalid option -- '2' Try `gsort --help' for more information. [crees@pegasus]~% Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 20:33:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A425E1065670 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:33:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746E58FC16 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:33:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E88D23C1B; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:33:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D68D5D23C04; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:33:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from macintosh.secnap.com (10.70.3.3) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:33:14 -0400 Message-ID: <4F62520A.7030300@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:33:14 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: , References: <4F62513F.7090708@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4F62513F.7090708@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Swatch rc script X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:33:16 -0000 On 3/15/12 4:29 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > > # $FreeBSD: ports/security/swatch/files/swatch.in,v 1.7 2012/01/14 > 08:56:53 dougb Exp $ > or this one? # $FreeBSD: ports/security/swatch/files/swatch.in,v 1.8 2012/02/10 14:37:30 scheidell Exp $ sb swatch 3.2.3_2 -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 21:14:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6635106564A; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:14:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@daemonic.se) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (mail.lysator.liu.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:17:f0a0::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F0F8FC0C; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:14:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D790040013; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:14:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix, from userid 1004) id CC6114000E; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:14:36 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bernadotte.lysator.liu.se X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 Received: from mx.daemonic.se (mx.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 942BB40006; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:14:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::6]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C2FB119D3D; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:14:36 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mx.daemonic.se ([IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::3]) (using TLS with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA) by mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [2001:470:dca9:0:1::6]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTPS id zaIAjAm58eoZ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:14:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::4]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8C29119D3C; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:14:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:1::4] (vivi.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:1::4]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E2DC12B089; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:14:33 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F625BB3.4060700@daemonic.se> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:14:27 +0100 From: Niclas Zeising User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Messenger References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , lua@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: lang/lua: It does need gmake. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:14:39 -0000 On 2012-03-15 20:50, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > I get a build failure on amd64: > > --------------------------------- > /usr/bin/ld: lapi.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `luaO_nilobject_' > can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC > lapi.o: could not read symbols: Bad value > *** Error code 1 > --------------------------------- > > I got it fixed by add USE_GMAKE=yes in the Makefile and now I can get > it built ok. If you compare the build log between make and gmake. You > will see it has different output. This > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/162279 has broken it. > > May I commit it by add USE_GMAKE=yes back in? > > Thanks, > Mezz > > Hi! I can't reproduce the error. I just tried and succeeded in compiling and linking lua on a x86_64 virtual machine. The md5 sum of liblua-5.1.so.1 is also the same, regardless of using make or gmake. Regards! -- Niclas From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 21:46:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF47F1065673 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:46:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951068FC17 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E5450827 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:46:23 -0700 (PDT) To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:46:23 -0700 Message-ID: <86781.1331847983@tristatelogic.com> From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Cc: Subject: graphics/dri maintainer? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:46:31 -0000 Who is allegedly maintaining the graphics/dri port at this moment in time? I would rather like to know, because it is in serious need of updating. (The version upon which the port was based was apparently released on June 23, 2009, and there have been numerous new releases since then.) I wouldn't care, except that gthumb was crashing on me (SIGSEGV) and a stack backtrace clearly showed that the problem resides within the Mesa/DRI library. Of course, I asked the Mesa/DRI dudes for help and advice, and of course they suggested that I consider using a rather more current version. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 22:03:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281ED106564A for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:03:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72518FC0C for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:03:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnk4 with SMTP id k4so4372759ggn.13 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:03:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=CCIJXdeFKQlicEswaRBa2m7f5jVkh3trLYD/Hd0JKxY=; b=UJM1TAzPTi2fHpWAKhhOeU+MaP7KtDyZQBpPDjffcvaQ2xHYZvo1lyK2r8CJgc7A5r hSL7Pp7CqjbjqN4iyXfLX2CMtUvVnHYHjtR1eGr/fZthlyqSV8AI4soN86IGVwlEzfQu VSMC58H9SL+Xw5+54JU2tugqbHhEyZdLcX54lVWcS6LTYFV9PaKuFjduzlBS0kiyxkmL WazQdux8kwFurD49Z4wBXuT7wLI5QQUm2ZIdTkL4cVNVhRfniqAFpYobe0AsvwvMX3Kk rQcuDXFO1kfEhxqYuNbG+T6ovTu7ON9yg8N7K4aHcAZE6L+yQQgqEqV20BdorPFF7Y4q mnwQ== Received: by 10.236.190.5 with SMTP id d5mr390684yhn.13.1331849031895; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i4sm3956714anm.5.2012.03.15.15.03.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3V83jK3TSyz2CG4w for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:03:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:03:49 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120315180349.7f8aa4a8@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <86781.1331847983@tristatelogic.com> References: <86781.1331847983@tristatelogic.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnVYZlJqsDOZGWb2L8nvHG/CFdh2tgtkuMJGnhNZ5/QYtmYTuBXykjO0RsFWi2T+AIS/mos Subject: Re: graphics/dri maintainer? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:03:53 -0000 On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:46:23 -0700 Ronald F. Guilmette articulated: > Who is allegedly maintaining the graphics/dri port at this moment in > time? x11@FreeBSD.org -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 22:15:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083011065757 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:15:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C898FC1B for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:15:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.48]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B07A71AF7 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:15:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 19790 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2012 22:15:13 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 8624, pid: 17776, t: 0.1554s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Mar 2012 22:15:13 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21BA33C1E; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:15:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 1151139860; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:15:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Oleg Moskalenko References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <44pqcd8yhd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2A6@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:15:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2A6@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> (Oleg Moskalenko's message of "Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:29:48 -0700") Message-ID: <44d38d8qad.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: 'Chris Rees' , Lowell Gilbert , Gabor Kovesdan , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:15:20 -0000 Oleg Moskalenko writes: > There is no option "-2" in the new BSD sort or in the GNU sort. There is no such option in Posix standard, too. > > What is this option about, do we need to add something ? No, clearly I have misdiagnosed the problem. I'll take another look. Sorry for the confusion. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 22:16:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8621065674 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:16:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from fsm2.ukr.net (fsm2.ukr.net [195.214.192.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323548FC17 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:16:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=fsm; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=vfyF1r1/kx+tp5fO/IuVRvUA+T5VqEFGY4D6TDnwkfA=; b=uKQ6UYu1IMVdC1OJ88DIg+K4sLFav9ZNevGE95bwPKQt9eSeC9E2wPRbfWQWhts1frvYB+hiWB0acAAYel75Jlk/XXIpBUGlH+aU/yk86xKGZ2P2rqv0Wr083VVz77mY2aYQmJmYpjoD21XMEhEliPZJJdFI1AIo5se+Iqs4UlE=; Received: from [178.137.138.140] (helo=nonamehost.) by fsm2.ukr.net with esmtpsa ID 1S8Ixv-000MRN-2Y ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:16:11 +0200 Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:16:09 +0200 From: Ivan Klymenko To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Message-ID: <20120316001609.43339bbb@nonamehost.> In-Reply-To: <86781.1331847983@tristatelogic.com> References: <86781.1331847983@tristatelogic.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: graphics/dri maintainer? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:16:22 -0000 =D0=92 Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:46:23 -0700 "Ronald F. Guilmette" =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1= =82: >=20 >=20 > Who is allegedly maintaining the graphics/dri port at this moment in > time? >=20 > I would rather like to know, because it is in serious need of > updating. (The version upon which the port was based was apparently > released on June 23, 2009, and there have been numerous new releases > since then.) >=20 > I wouldn't care, except that gthumb was crashing on me (SIGSEGV) and a > stack backtrace clearly showed that the problem resides within the > Mesa/DRI library. >=20 > Of course, I asked the Mesa/DRI dudes for help and advice, and of > course they suggested that I consider using a rather more current > version. Take a look here: http://miwi.bsdcrew.de/2011/02/cft-xorg-7-5-miwi1-freebsd-edition/ or you can select a new Mesa in this repository: svn co https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/ports/trunk My current ports: xorg-server-1.12.0,1 libGL-8.0.1 libGLU-8.0.1 ... etc... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 23:08:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14CB1065673 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:08:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE828FC17 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.42]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81526A71BEE for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:08:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 9478 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2012 23:08:57 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 6420, pid: 24119, t: 0.1536s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Mar 2012 23:08:57 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484DB33C1E; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:08:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id D702439860; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:08:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Oleg Moskalenko References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <44pqcd8yhd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2A6@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <44d38d8qad.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:08:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <44d38d8qad.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> (Lowell Gilbert's message of "Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:15:06 -0400") Message-ID: <447gyl8nss.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: 'Chris Rees' , Gabor Kovesdan , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:08:59 -0000 Lowell Gilbert writes: > Oleg Moskalenko writes: > >> There is no option "-2" in the new BSD sort or in the GNU sort. There is no such option in Posix standard, too. >> >> What is this option about, do we need to add something ? > > No, clearly I have misdiagnosed the problem. > I'll take another look. > > Sorry for the confusion. I think I'll need to dig into portsdb itself a bit. > Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait.. > sort: invalid option -- 2 I'll let you know what I find. - Lowell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 23:18:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9861065670; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:18:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB418FC0A; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:18:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so6085869iah.13 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:18:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rmdutQRlh0AAkela9QhUSWBjOGRLShx3bFSj483uBj4=; b=0/xc2uB1HPVigedAR9jQ9I9YR9BwjSbWdOm7Mepb1DVuYBao7ngezRJmqDq3lGfGBb ceAupOYM44gseqUtcHgmGICFBtEUcEf658fpzXeaJEeEpa0saeGUMYyvKkSTnLPCLa3f cyFjRB7D5x8urbgAeTiFEbb7cqdR9W/UOgSqODxE+h93YFm4D/cWGZV0XMfmXcG46w54 jlh/H2lbeYMGmaiTM50E5Aw/1FQIDUojqU2ENb8sCODFEtHVsTWdcshu1TvPUO567I1+ RDVB+etc5JD5BYlbTC3o1XcklNJrgj8RAJpZUwEA8wdHH8F90ljl2I9lgUdFFwZfDeiB Bq1w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.135.74 with SMTP id pq10mr18045283igb.62.1331853523981; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:18:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.217.202 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:18:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F625BB3.4060700@daemonic.se> References: <4F625BB3.4060700@daemonic.se> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:18:43 -0500 Message-ID: From: Jeremy Messenger To: Niclas Zeising Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , lua@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lang/lua: It does need gmake. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:18:44 -0000 On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 2012-03-15 20:50, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> I get a build failure on amd64: >> >> --------------------------------- >> /usr/bin/ld: lapi.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `luaO_nilobject_' >> can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC >> lapi.o: could not read symbols: Bad value >> *** Error code 1 >> --------------------------------- >> >> I got it fixed by add USE_GMAKE=yes in the Makefile and now I can get >> it built ok. If you compare the build log between make and gmake. You >> will see it has different output. This >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/162279 has broken it. >> >> May I commit it by add USE_GMAKE=yes back in? >> >> Thanks, >> Mezz >> >> > > Hi! > I can't reproduce the error. I just tried and succeeded in compiling and > linking lua on a x86_64 virtual machine. Figured out. Add custom CFLAGS in the make.conf and you will get a build failure with make but not gmake. Here's what I have in my make.conf: CFLAGS= -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -g STRIP= Cheers, Mezz > The md5 sum of liblua-5.1.so.1 is also the same, regardless of using > make or gmake. > Regards! > -- > Niclas -- mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 23:28:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2438106564A for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:28:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2548FC14 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.42]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C8CA716CA for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:28:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 7469 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2012 23:28:04 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 14084, pid: 4795, t: 0.1595s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Mar 2012 23:28:04 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CFDF33C1E; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:27:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 20D2339860; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:27:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Oleg Moskalenko References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <44pqcd8yhd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2A6@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <44d38d8qad.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <447gyl8nss.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:27:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <447gyl8nss.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> (Lowell Gilbert's message of "Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:08:51 -0400") Message-ID: <4439998mwx.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:28:05 -0000 Lowell Gilbert writes: > Lowell Gilbert writes: > >> Oleg Moskalenko writes: >> >>> There is no option "-2" in the new BSD sort or in the GNU sort. There is no such option in Posix standard, too. >>> >>> What is this option about, do we need to add something ? >> >> No, clearly I have misdiagnosed the problem. >> I'll take another look. >> >> Sorry for the confusion. > > I think I'll need to dig into portsdb itself a bit. > >> Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait.. >> sort: invalid option -- 2 > > I'll let you know what I find. This is taking longer than I had hoped; apparently I am handicapped by the fact that I do not know ruby at all. I am having difficulty finding a call out to the sort program, as opposed to sort routines implemented in ruby. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 23:32:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883001065670 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:32:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jos@catnook.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154868FC1B for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:32:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaaf13 with SMTP id f13so2312043eaa.13 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:32:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=ZqfMnKa9FqnkWcZM437Pn0kyoXtnk66try+xBMEBLbc=; b=XUV3OjrZY1wIR7D1G4814FL0L0xVpn83LT/ra4qmNkT+mtw3IQtHONrQhCt5FsibVK GUWBaauXbWo4/3YO3oFybjiCeZT+O6wSIbvZ3f3jXppZ96iCTl4q3FVVykrYw1OqzIdb v3hpW+dynXO19qOwxNcq4LQbsIIW4OW3SU9zkN5bN18Gj38Oj9ofUApveTuORU6zIOhz ZWD0VPz4uSuB35LRJez6fTlZEoHWpJWMW58m0de3YayiZn+yyqv28BW9D5lWsvJSVE1i ZWSkDP4oDg1fZMR3bCIzmr6oZlIq6XAmP5nx5grdsDF+U0uPGqzjWcxgvwwECqxcYG// u+3A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.136.16 with SMTP id v16mr50235eei.126.1331854325897; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:32:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.94.199 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:32:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4439998mwx.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <44pqcd8yhd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2A6@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <44d38d8qad.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <447gyl8nss.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <4439998mwx.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:32:05 -0700 Message-ID: From: Jos Backus To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnNNq7AuDE+nuzf2CF+Pj2EcfacB2LZthKfZRGp8I3IeHIbX0/P6cfoGpAsLO6UcuAfHsXg Cc: Oleg Moskalenko Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:32:07 -0000 On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Lowell Gilbert writes: > >> Lowell Gilbert writes: >> >>> Oleg Moskalenko writes: >>> >>>> There is no option "-2" in the new BSD sort or in the GNU sort. There = is no such option in Posix standard, too. >>>> >>>> What is this option about, do we need to add something ? >>> >>> No, clearly I have misdiagnosed the problem. >>> I'll take another look. >>> >>> Sorry for the confusion. >> >> I think I'll need to dig into portsdb itself a bit. >> >>> =A0 =A0Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait.= . >>> =A0 =A0sort: invalid option -- 2 >> >> I'll let you know what I find. > > This is taking longer than I had hoped; apparently I am handicapped by > the fact that I do not know ruby at all. I am having difficulty finding > a call out to the sort program, as opposed to sort routines implemented > in ruby. portsdb.rb: open("| sort #{index_files}", 'r:utf-8') do |f| Hth, Jos _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 Jos Backus jos at catnook.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 23:32:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70BD3106566B; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:32:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE948FC1A; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so6104882iah.13 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:32:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=pZavkQst5SAAYz0tav3q69K9/2iOsh10720Las0lWFg=; b=JMdK3Y940AelyZNwNAUWhs7VD+womuwz6Tkr9pxaTO5qnH3jktYWBbsdIzMO5tDz2o ByeoHHBSioir0Q1CJXVjX7cxnNtZFTcY40raBN6+asbLjOZ7PqBEVu/vfBxcul1sLj9o 7XLXmT3yCbI148xqQrE5gLY6Wzq+GIkJmx+ZU2zplEHkAsuHZfXDvcnxWH2pgYMHB7cR OBAsajO/tpBDi9zhP/Cp6Ocqt/XeNqYU8YymGXuDbRTw1HWFFWVWxQIB8m/Ou6KvlBB0 mx0WYtHpflhDH4p+V4x+t2GTtCSPnmVmZUzcmmK7Gp6c2F3zBrCyZfcf7V75W34F6hSh P//A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.147.67 with SMTP id m3mr308282icv.34.1331854348527; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:32:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.217.202 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:32:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <29F62249-E361-4484-A888-B569CE371506@mac.com> References: <4F625BB3.4060700@daemonic.se> <29F62249-E361-4484-A888-B569CE371506@mac.com> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:32:28 -0500 Message-ID: From: Jeremy Messenger To: Chuck Swiger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , lua@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lang/lua: It does need gmake. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:32:29 -0000 On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Mar 15, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> Figured out. Add custom CFLAGS in the make.conf and you will get a >> build failure with make but not gmake. Here's what I have in my >> make.conf: >> >> CFLAGS= -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -g >> STRIP= > > Does it work properly if you use "CFLAGS+=" instead? It will, but you do not need to put '+' in make.conf. I have same CFLAGS for years and years, btw. Cheers, Mezz > Regards, > -- > -Chuck -- mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 16 00:05:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35277106566C for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:05:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E379E8FC08 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:05:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.53]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E5FA723F5 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:05:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 4679 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2012 00:05:43 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 17543, pid: 7416, t: 0.1815s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:13495 Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 16 Mar 2012 00:05:43 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8D733C1E; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:05:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id C90E039860; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:05:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Jos Backus References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <44pqcd8yhd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2A6@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <44d38d8qad.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <447gyl8nss.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <4439998mwx.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:05:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Jos Backus's message of "Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:32:05 -0700") Message-ID: <44ty1p76lq.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Oleg Moskalenko , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:05:45 -0000 Jos Backus writes: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Lowell Gilbert > wrote: >> Lowell Gilbert writes: >> >>> Lowell Gilbert writes: >>> >>>> Oleg Moskalenko writes: >>>> >>>>> There is no option "-2" in the new BSD sort or in the GNU sort. There= is no such option in Posix standard, too. >>>>> >>>>> What is this option about, do we need to add something ? >>>> >>>> No, clearly I have misdiagnosed the problem. >>>> I'll take another look. >>>> >>>> Sorry for the confusion. >>> >>> I think I'll need to dig into portsdb itself a bit. >>> >>>> =A0 =A0Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait= .. >>>> =A0 =A0sort: invalid option -- 2 >>> >>> I'll let you know what I find. >> >> This is taking longer than I had hoped; apparently I am handicapped by >> the fact that I do not know ruby at all. I am having difficulty finding >> a call out to the sort program, as opposed to sort routines implemented >> in ruby. > > portsdb.rb: open("| sort #{index_files}", 'r:utf-8') do |f| > > Hth, > Jos Thanks, it does help somewhat. Unfortunately, I had already tried to instrument that line, and didn't get anything useful. I probably still need to learn a bit more ruby in order to figure out precisely where the '2' comes in. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 16 02:35:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2D61065674 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 02:35:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B1D8FC0C for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 02:35:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wern13 with SMTP id n13so4555426wer.13 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:35:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=L7hBVqMWGMGbU/rWRNTfnIyWVOQZhSI2oporBKYg4sk=; b=fsnfCkRX1oYmkbAJnG3vtMmqNsNmODJ3qrLc/g/o0CtwkAxzvEAL5ZuZ60poy/Ivwb VtUcwN5Z1bwfUsD9cEdK8EXFoQkBiE3zuTFJX7ukU2ThDCGD9pcMzF2Hec8FEgONRNVX YIbivK4bZEvwKVCD6aOq8SOIOkQQtDIXS0Xag= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=L7hBVqMWGMGbU/rWRNTfnIyWVOQZhSI2oporBKYg4sk=; b=Ndi2HTCk/JX876xBVk4aP49QKNIEhRpBK/yWkPMR9geu9V+INexUDpLSNmsc98yVyv rDC2P+xElBBOeaBsGkXmyOtKT06J5NwFGj3S4GJGf3bOCNSROW76q71fMOBfMnPF79Xv 5RfDSnfTGE5sPrvo0rB5YORkmA2qypfO1zNOmkAIHfQaTsWI84Hl/Wt6Gxc85oL61IQF JS6HB629XQ31pImfxIUafL3EqxSeYCJ2uHKxsk+GO+CdsjkycJ9ErPw+hoZiq3pVWLgp 8QDEC+GllB4sok1146YcFzRsbJuwdiiVKNdmHRfUbwUVSuORL9we4txMyhm3iabc9G0N LnTQ== Received: by 10.180.84.164 with SMTP id a4mr2474508wiz.2.1331865341647; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:35:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.78.204 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:35:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86781.1331847983@tristatelogic.com> References: <86781.1331847983@tristatelogic.com> From: Eitan Adler Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:35:11 -0400 Message-ID: To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmwWKdOFFyDjtioUd2s03q1OgK1icsUFBwGgezXXRx/ipH/hjn6TszpyPouDhO1kMx4Cdj/ Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: graphics/dri maintainer? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 02:35:43 -0000 On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > Of course, I asked the Mesa/DRI dudes for help and advice, and of course > they suggested that I consider using a rather more current version. x11@ has an experimental repository available (information here http://wiki.freebsd.org/Xorg) with an updated version. Note that if you have an Intel card you will have to patch your kernel. We plan on merging the repository to mainline after the release of 8.3. -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 16 10:50:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E5E1065676 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:50:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC7F8FC08 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wern13 with SMTP id n13so4943525wer.13 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:50:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ZolhfWHJID54vIRG3rtw2O15VngU2oUrh6xUUhRFKrw=; b=ILLw6Xg43QCsGvqUREthUSrmkhz+RyPTZurvzsag+p99HHOJEBIuLh12pN7ua6GbRF SQtPWwo5Yc4czW0hPmtpdxekcT0Ue/S7wVG6xK9WaQyWSTcrUCICqYUbo+Aapv1caAB7 YVJjBk9odBE8Z/vn5tSPyj+vHXl56zbvDhjcrQfUdzaygK/edXeea5hx4+PUMWqa7saD denbi6K4kvlP+1Hk2GY8BW9G+5hszSVvLDe6NlY2bYHcguJYpLAlKsDNaxsGoVdVQzps vckuBmbYTDz8RkUOOHIbepXQSw7s9M/NoQSLUAVH8Q7ULLIJTaMix65HE3ycKWqM1k9G nt6g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.132.222 with SMTP id o72mr1194479wei.95.1331894999994; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:49:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.106.42 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:49:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:49:59 +0000 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Jeremy Messenger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: lang/lua: It does need gmake. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:50:01 -0000 Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: > > On Mar 15, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > >> Figured out. Add custom CFLAGS in the make.conf and you will get a > >> build failure with make but not gmake. Here's what I have in my > >> make.conf: > >> > >> CFLAGS= -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -g > >> STRIP= > > > > Does it work properly if you use "CFLAGS+=" instead? > > It will, but you do not need to put '+' in make.conf. I have same > CFLAGS for years and years, btw. If you have been making these assignments unconditionally, then for years and years you have been in danger of breaking or damaging the builds for many ports that explicitly invoke make(1) more than once (and thus read make.conf more than once), by clobbering prior changes to CFLAGS or STRIP that are made in port makefiles. Despite the misleading examples in the base-system example make.conf, this kind of customization is not supported for Ports, and not encouraged. You should take steps to ensure that your custom values are set only once, before any top-level port Makefile is parsed. You can define them conditionally, or move them to another makefile that is included only once, or disable multiple inclusions of make.conf for Ports by using something like "__MAKE_CONF=/dev/null" in the right place. b. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 16 12:19:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D3C106566B for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:19:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from victor@bsdes.net) Received: from equilibrium.bsdes.net (244.Red-217-126-240.staticIP.rima-tde.net [217.126.240.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6198FC15 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by equilibrium.bsdes.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 974A039844; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:12:59 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:12:59 +0100 From: Victor Balada Diaz To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20120316121259.GH5886@equilibrium.bsdes.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Subject: Jython as PYTHON_VENDOR in bsd.python.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:19:29 -0000 Hello, I'm trying to port django-jython[1] to FreeBSD. Jython[2] is a python interpreter written in java. Django is a popular web framework written in python. For it to work under java i need django-python which have some database specific drivers. The problem is that while i tried porting, seems i can't use bsd.python.mk because USE_PYTHON doesn't have a way to recognize jython as a python interpreter. Does anyone know what's the best approach for porting this? I think that maybe jython should be added as python vendor in the same way we have JAVA_VENDOR for java. What do you think? Thanks a lot. Regards. [1]: http://code.google.com/p/django-jython/ [2]: http://www.jython.org/ -- La prueba ms fehaciente de que existe vida inteligente en otros planetas, es que no han intentado contactar con nosotros. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 16 18:13:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB30106578B for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:13:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEAD8FC0A for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:13:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcmm1 with SMTP id m1so6328746vcm.13 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:13:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=xe7uqkDxyeYCBNZLW46fYRogzMHSyEVmypIORXSUEow=; b=roYAVGsGW6u3fkFb9dj9zMBSWoIKXgO8f2u8ONgyN1icfRBVnMWl2Kyy1sXLFOj4K6 GmkRYftlPtanE280HSaBu069WKN3CuqRfRirfAlydE8x87xaJfHh8pBUuZSQP2swm6ha jreNOUUvk+yjl3tN0SokHIrZj5Hm7dbKhz/d5YdLZJ1eR4vs1KSQzjhHSKCkRmuE57Ff N/l6f3/yFxuB32xdHA08YTjN73+u7x0/8bGZSRWTF5eRlT7eCUVa3lkOJAj1zyN86j5Y MLIWOFx8EPrxskHuQlEF3mog1TZrdltytMBuzYJDV/sMGTeJM5RdiTjEgeN1MrvreDyt qYFQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.24.40 with SMTP id r8mr1799888vdf.108.1331921632851; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:13:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.70.200 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:13:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <44ty1p76lq.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <44pqcd8yhd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2A6@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <44d38d8qad.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <447gyl8nss.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <4439998mwx.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <44ty1p76lq.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:13:52 +0100 Message-ID: From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:13:54 -0000 On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Thanks, it does help somewhat. > > Unfortunately, I had already tried to instrument that line, and didn't > get anything useful. I probably still need to learn a bit more ruby in > order to figure out precisely where the '2' comes in. Quick guess: look for troubles with stdin, stdout or stderr. HTH -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 16 18:18:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mandree.no-ip.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A181065678; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:18:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mandree@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6BD23CE8A; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:18:51 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F63840B.6040401@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:18:51 +0100 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.27) Gecko/20120216 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Messenger References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , lua@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: lang/lua: It does need gmake. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:18:52 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 15.03.2012 20:50, schrieb Jeremy Messenger: > I get a build failure on amd64: > > --------------------------------- > /usr/bin/ld: lapi.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `luaO_nilobject_' > can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC > lapi.o: could not read symbols: Bad value > *** Error code 1 > --------------------------------- > > I got it fixed by add USE_GMAKE=yes in the Makefile and now I can get > it built ok. If you compare the build log between make and gmake. You > will see it has different output. This > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/162279 has broken it. > > May I commit it by add USE_GMAKE=yes back in? Jeremy, rather not -- let's not add dependencies if we can help it; MAKE_ARGS= CFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" seems to do the trick for me (I could reproduce your problem on 9-STABLE amd64). I've committed that (without bumping port revision) after short discussion with Niclas and some Tinderbox and "port test" smoke tests, please let us know if it doesn't help. I suppose the issue is that GNU make passes variables from environment in a different way than BSD make does, or CFLAGS are assembled in a different way, but I lack the time to investigate before end of March. Since stuffing CFLAGS onto the command line helps, I think we should be fine though. Feel free to shed some light and/or investigate. Best regards Matthias -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk9jg/4ACgkQvmGDOQUufZWMoACg0maMPVq0vYhk9fq+vOHB8+TG ua8AoIp6CzQ8/kBunjja1V8pL0q9Ae66 =ITMi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 16 19:14:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (pointyhat.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::2b]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7D2106564A for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:14:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@freebsd.org) Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2GJEqFj001624 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:14:52 GMT (envelope-from erwin@pointyhat.freebsd.org) Received: (from erwin@localhost) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id q2GJEp6U001623 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:14:51 GMT (envelope-from erwin) Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:14:51 GMT From: Erwin Lansing Message-Id: <201203161914.q2GJEp6U001623@pointyhat.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: INDEX build failed for 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:14:52 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: dbmail-2.2.17 Committers on the hook: dhn dinoex jhb mandree mm rm sunpoet Most recent CVS update was: U databases/leveldb/Makefile U databases/leveldb/distinfo U devel/p5-Symbol-Util/Makefile U devel/p5-Symbol-Util/distinfo U devel/pear-channel-horde/Makefile U devel/pear-channel-horde/files/pear.horde.org.reg U irc/xchat-ruby/Makefile U irc/xchat-ruby/files/patch-Makefile U irc/xchat-ruby/files/rubypath.rb U lang/lua/Makefile U mail/Makefile U mail/dbmail22/Makefile U mail/dbmail22/distinfo U mail/dbmail22/pkg-descr U mail/dbmail22/pkg-plist U mail/dbmail22/files/dbmail-imapd.sh.in U mail/dbmail22/files/dbmail-lmtpd.sh.in U mail/dbmail22/files/dbmail-pop3d.sh.in U mail/dbmail22/files/dbmail-timsieved.sh.in U mail/dbmail22/files/pkg-message.in U net/p5-Net-Server/Makefile U net/wired/Makefile U sysutils/etcupdate/Makefile U sysutils/etcupdate/src/etcupdate.8 U sysutils/etcupdate/src/etcupdate.sh U textproc/p5-XML-LibXML-PrettyPrint/Makefile U textproc/p5-XML-LibXML-PrettyPrint/distinfo From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 16 20:25:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB81106564A for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:25:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwinlculp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85CA8FC15 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:25:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so4372938bkc.13 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:25:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=531u/xxPP+fn3Xel6XG0K2A131LesZ/nSTNXkqPBhvk=; b=rU1geCrO5C4NdRasKhuxGShmbbecpTOrsm6NTXiWVO2kPVp5F/071VuATZmm6Zpgwc URxulYPpW5qwq+xr/lxV0t86ouqOBhocv8oUpXvzqpfM7jiQof7KLyb6A9oLtzJIq7d2 cXSfbRsrZSOFcNacr12aXvVz+X7N8KDtjSdUpAqSqqyUQ6qegkeB3Z2Rhn0jKyqZ3Qwc zKjxL8+MSgQ9THTs/uHrpmgjMcUHbc2XNqivaefubw5MFLVr3bG5vkAz7Bu6mrMdkGtD Ed8DibI8m7Vxp5KsKtKW6DLOHETeajaVu9EUwnWj6jKv92MpIofAkXihzSpfUTaZRqZe wiTg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.143.151 with SMTP id v23mr1502811bku.63.1331929504825; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:25:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.174.203 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:25:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:25:04 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Edwin L. Culp W." To: freebsd-ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: skype-devel-2.2.0.35 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:25:06 -0000 2012/3/14 Edwin L. Culp W. > I am running 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #89 r229960M: Mon Mar 12 > 05:11:09 CST 2012 amd64. I am not a big skype user but the last couple of > weeks it hasn't worked and I've actually enjoyed the silence;) but someday > I need to get it going. > > World and all ports are up to date and the skype configuration that may > be different than default > > Video support not checked > Audio is oss on all > > The rest should be the same. > > When I try to call I get an immediate call failed. Messages don't go > through and I never see a user on line. It almost seems like it isn't > connected but I don't see how. I also tried going back to the 2.1.0.81 > version and the same problem. This must be something DUMB that I have done > but . . . . . > > Thanks for any suggestions, > > ed > > I have been trying to get more information by executing it on the command line and see nothing, I finally checked log/messages and found: Mar 16 14:14:47 home kernel: linux: pid 35294 (skype): syscall inotify_init not implemented Mar 16 14:14:47 home kernel: linux: pid 35285 (skype): ioctl fd=23, cmd=0x8b01 ('<8B>',1) is not implemented Mar 16 14:14:47 home last message repeated 11 times Mar 16 14:14:47 home kernel: pid 35293 (skype), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) Mar 16 14:14:57 home kernel: linux: pid 35285 (skype): ioctl fd=23, cmd=0x8b01 ('<8B>',1) is not implemented Mar 16 14:14:57 home last message repeated 11 times I have no idea what is "not implemented" nor why but at least maybe someone else will. I haven't changed anything since it worked except keep everything up to date (ports and world) Thanks for any help ws From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 16 21:56:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5251065675 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:56:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740488FC15 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:56:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so8088359iah.13 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:56:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wdnfrayIdKs1oPF+RFNe+muVWWxIQHK8T/g+dEBqv7k=; b=vX6ogEgUJUlew85cSj+NqJWe8qqUXQpnjjujSukLLxlSfIOv9KmHcOIbRMqy0EueXR t0rLkL0Bi9/T7GXPZCCeigKd4tgy4CXcNFRMcI6pEI+Mktnod7Ate1ToZSluz6Pppnei De9KKP1clfLNWVrkH1cRzO8u9E3LqT92XHTKCvRL1pRC49FO7NthbfMyfeQ2iU0TyfyV +2K0KnJuh90ko4Tn6u7kDauUH5VodnAb0C9TegJvq8ikTOa/3ITPALED7JS9t3b4JK1b wbvjtJ0ydwVYxpbRtvpMBj99Jc4q7KLDjoxoYLvbUvC/De7VTIPDmAvF6UG41/0dMCqH Llbw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.42.134 with SMTP id o6mr529363igl.72.1331934982023; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:56:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.217.202 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:56:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:56:21 -0500 Message-ID: From: Jeremy Messenger To: bf1783@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lang/lua: It does need gmake. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:56:22 -0000 On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:49 AM, b. f. wrote: > Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote= : >> > On Mar 15, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> >> Figured out. Add custom CFLAGS in the make.conf and you will get a >> >> build failure with make but not gmake. Here's what I have in my >> >> make.conf: >> >> >> >> CFLAGS=3D -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -g >> >> STRIP=3D >> > >> > Does it work properly if you use "CFLAGS+=3D" instead? >> >> It will, but you do not need to put '+' in make.conf. I have same >> CFLAGS for years and years, btw. > > If you have been making these assignments unconditionally, then for > years and years you have been in danger of breaking or damaging the > builds for many ports that explicitly invoke make(1) more than once > (and thus read make.conf more than once), by clobbering prior changes > to CFLAGS or STRIP that are made in port makefiles. =A0Despite the > misleading examples in the base-system example make.conf, this kind of > customization is not supported for Ports, and not encouraged. =A0You > should take steps to ensure that your custom values are set only once, > before any top-level port Makefile is parsed. =A0You can define them > conditionally, or move them to another makefile that is included only > once, or disable multiple inclusions of make.conf for Ports by using > something like "__MAKE_CONF=3D/dev/null" in the right place. Any ports have to respect the CFLAGS, see the porter handbook. If it fails to do then it needs to be fixed. Add '+' in the make.conf is not right way to do it as it's merely add in exists CFLAGS. mandree, thanks for took care of it! Cheers, Mezz > b. --=20 mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 16 22:12:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (pointyhat.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::2b]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA38D1065672 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:12:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@freebsd.org) Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2GMCtTH056856 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:12:55 GMT (envelope-from erwin@pointyhat.freebsd.org) Received: (from erwin@localhost) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id q2GMCtew056841 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:12:55 GMT (envelope-from erwin) Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:12:55 GMT From: Erwin Lansing Message-Id: <201203162212.q2GMCtew056841@pointyhat.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: INDEX now builds successfully on 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:12:56 -0000 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 16 22:37:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25CA1065676 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:37:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E448FC18 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.48]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D77A7167F for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:37:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 22986 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2012 22:37:30 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 8010, pid: 4268, t: 0.1967s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 16 Mar 2012 22:37:30 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6C133C1E; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:37:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 984B139860; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:37:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <44pqcd8yhd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:37:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Chris Rees's message of "Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:50:29 +0000") Message-ID: <4462e46ul7.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Chris Rees , Oleg Moskalenko , Gabor Kovesdan Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:37:32 -0000 Chris Rees writes: > On 15 March 2012 19:18, Lowell Gilbert > wrote: >> Gabor Kovesdan writes: >> >>> some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since >>> the OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was hard to >>> modify. The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg >>> Moskalenko showed interest in continuing >>> this version and he has made a very good job on this BSD sort >>> variant. Now it is compatible with the base version of GNU sort but >>> the performance in most cases (string sort and -n) is quite behind GNU >>> sort (although with -g it is about *4 times* faster). Oleg is still >>> working on optimizing the code and the long-term plan is to drop GNU >>> sort once this variant is good enough to replace it. For now, it is >>> only available in Ports Collection as textproc/bsdsort but if there is >>> no objection or any serious bug report I plan to add it to base >>> installed as bsdsort, being GNU sort still the default sort until it >>> proves that we can safely drop GNU sort. If you are interested in this >>> sort utility, could you please try the port and report us any issue >>> that you experience? >> >> portsdb(1) (from portupgrade) doesn't seem to like it; >> apparently it is missing a '-2' option, which I haven't >> tracked down yet... > > Fails with gnusort too anyway: > > [crees@pegasus]~% gsort -2 > gsort: invalid option -- '2' > Try `gsort --help' for more information. > [crees@pegasus]~% As it turns out, this *is* something that Gnu sort supports, although the documentation claims that the syntax is obsolete -- and doesn't document it very well. [5022] (lowell-desk) ~> printf "fee\nfie\nfoe\nfum\nfoo\nbaz" |gsort -t 'a' +1 -2 fee fie foe foo fum baz [5022] (lowell-desk) ~> It wouldn't be bad if BSD sort supported it, but it should definitely be fixed in the ports Makefile. I have submitted the fix in a PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166188 Personally, I'd don't see any reason for bsdsort to include this functionality... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 16 22:39:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC225106566C for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:39:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8805C8FC0C for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:39:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.48]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5744A702C6 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:39:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 7220 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2012 22:39:32 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 29705, pid: 2010, t: 0.1375s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 16 Mar 2012 22:39:32 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9BFB33C1E for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:39:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 8E08039860; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:39:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <44pqcd8yhd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <4462e46ul7.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:39:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4462e46ul7.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> (Lowell Gilbert's message of "Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:37:24 -0400") Message-ID: <44vcm45fxd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:39:33 -0000 Lowell Gilbert writes: > It wouldn't be bad if BSD sort supported it, but it should definitely be > fixed in the ports Makefile. I have submitted the fix in a PR: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166188 And I forgot to mark the PR with [PATCH]... Grumble. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 16 22:50:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656D21065675; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:50:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oleg.moskalenko@citrix.com) Received: from SMTP02.CITRIX.COM (smtp02.citrix.com [66.165.176.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26D58FC0A; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:50:16 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,601,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="186348349" Received: from sjcpmailmx01.citrite.net ([10.216.14.74]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 16 Mar 2012 18:50:09 -0400 Received: from SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net ([10.216.4.73]) by SJCPMAILMX01.citrite.net ([10.216.14.74]) with mapi; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:50:08 -0700 From: Oleg Moskalenko To: 'Lowell Gilbert' , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:50:08 -0700 Thread-Topic: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available Thread-Index: Ac0DxWHVmSNnWAK3QLWbmwoMshgz1wAAPU9g Message-ID: <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2AB@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <44pqcd8yhd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <4462e46ul7.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <4462e46ul7.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Chris Rees , Gabor Kovesdan Subject: RE: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:50:17 -0000 Yes, indeed, there was an old sort syntax, where they supported it in a for= m "+POS1 -POS2". It is a non-POSIX obsolete syntax, so we did not implement= it in the new BSD sort. I can add it, if necessary. Regards, Oleg -----Original Message----- From: Lowell Gilbert [mailto:freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org]=20 Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 3:37 PM To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Chris Rees; Gabor Kovesdan; Oleg Moskalenko Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available Chris Rees writes: > On 15 March 2012 19:18, Lowell Gilbert > wrote: >> Gabor Kovesdan writes: >> >>> some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since >>> the OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was hard to >>> modify. The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg >>> Moskalenko showed interest in continuing >>> this version and he has made a very good job on this BSD sort >>> variant. Now it is compatible with the base version of GNU sort but >>> the performance in most cases (string sort and -n) is quite behind GNU >>> sort (although with -g it is about *4 times* faster). Oleg is still >>> working on optimizing the code and the long-term plan is to drop GNU >>> sort once this variant is good enough to replace it. For now, it is >>> only available in Ports Collection as textproc/bsdsort but if there is >>> no objection or any serious bug report I plan to add it to base >>> installed as bsdsort, being GNU sort still the default sort until it >>> proves that we can safely drop GNU sort. If you are interested in this >>> sort utility, could you please try the port and report us any issue >>> that you experience? >> >> portsdb(1) (from portupgrade) doesn't seem to like it; >> apparently it is missing a '-2' option, which I haven't >> tracked down yet... > > Fails with gnusort too anyway: > > [crees@pegasus]~% gsort -2 > gsort: invalid option -- '2' > Try `gsort --help' for more information. > [crees@pegasus]~% As it turns out, this *is* something that Gnu sort supports, although the documentation claims that the syntax is obsolete -- and doesn't document it very well. [5022] (lowell-desk) ~> printf "fee\nfie\nfoe\nfum\nfoo\nbaz" |gsort -t= 'a' +1 -2 fee fie foe foo fum baz [5022] (lowell-desk) ~>=20 It wouldn't be bad if BSD sort supported it, but it should definitely be fixed in the ports Makefile. I have submitted the fix in a PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D166188 Personally, I'd don't see any reason for bsdsort to include this functionality... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 17 00:34:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6DD106564A for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 00:34:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CCE58FC12 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 00:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so4497942bkc.13 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:34:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=7QEcO0+l/ZUzAy5NGck0w/IA4vX6cSX/N0OVcvLrUoY=; b=kHcAJgtT+sTPdt3bHu9Rv7FF7S/xmVk5b3p+/yy5OxLP0My6ONyEMFLTWHAuLbe3Hk zZVWxbrj0Ao2GVsbXJ5UlAmo2R54rEVOlXwJVADTxouYo/kCA47m604VYjRiuAagPEcs 9fCEcjz3OOe/gl9GO3dX3J1JiKOmtMI/yX1xKnIftawFRhAobtmJYuRlcUG+I5E5n5Iu whw0B5t8uvSR/OiN4PZq2rY0yQbxS/O1yGkb4+4Kv9YvPvE2uA8YpaGxuZERcf745t1o ywyfLZ/e6wpXsjxTnBtrSpfa+pYkVGFBbklXlAQdxRjiAYEqNY1wxZyk5c6jTan253S2 cs8Q== Received: by 10.204.157.135 with SMTP id b7mr88768bkx.90.1331944448978; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:34:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:33:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <44vcm45fxd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <44pqcd8yhd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <4462e46ul7.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <44vcm45fxd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> From: Chris Rees Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 00:33:38 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: XbOkxyQspJBOt5Yrb_9v3J0OMVE Message-ID: To: Lowell Gilbert Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 00:34:10 -0000 On 16 March 2012 22:39, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Lowell Gilbert writes: > >> It wouldn't be bad if BSD sort supported it, but it should definitely be >> fixed in the ports Makefile. I have submitted the fix in a PR: >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166188 > > And I forgot to mark the PR with [PATCH]... > > Grumble. Fixed :) Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 17 01:25:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F651106566B; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 01:25:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FF41502B4; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 01:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F63E809.1080606@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:25:29 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120224 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Anderson References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Adrian Chadd , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Gabor Kovesdan , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Oleg Moskalenko Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 01:25:30 -0000 On 03/14/2012 15:14, Jonathan Anderson wrote: > In fact, the runtime behaviour of the Debian "alternatives" system is simpler than that: > http://segfault.in/2010/04/using-the-debian-alternatives-system/ > > The custom Perl script with a config file is used to set up symlinks, which at runtime are... well, just symlinks. For instance, /usr/bin/vim is a symlink to /etc/alternatives/vim, which is itself a symlink to a binary like vim.gtk (example shamelessly stolen from the linked page, since I no longer have any Debian boxes to check for myself on :). No magic binaries or argv[0] fu. This sounds like a good solution to more than one problem. Does anyone know why they indirect through 2 sets of symlinks? That article doesn't touch on the "why?" only the what. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 17 01:57:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A998A106566C; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 01:57:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eric@vangyzen.net) Received: from smtp.vangyzen.net (173-165-232-89-minnesota.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.165.232.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9D98FC0A; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 01:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from latitude.vangyzen.net (dhcp-28.vangyzen.net [192.0.2.28]) by smtp.vangyzen.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CC2B839; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:47:13 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4F63ED21.60302@vangyzen.net> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:47:13 -0500 From: Eric van Gyzen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120209 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <4F63E809.1080606@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F63E809.1080606@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Adrian Chadd , Oleg Moskalenko , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Jonathan Anderson , Gabor Kovesdan , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 01:57:12 -0000 On 03/16/2012 08:25 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 03/14/2012 15:14, Jonathan Anderson wrote: >> In fact, the runtime behaviour of the Debian "alternatives" system is simpler than that: >> http://segfault.in/2010/04/using-the-debian-alternatives-system/ [...] > This sounds like a good solution to more than one problem. Does anyone > know why they indirect through 2 sets of symlinks? That article doesn't > touch on the "why?" only the what. Do you mean, why do they do /usr/bin/vim -> /etc/alternatives/vim -> /usr/bin/vim.gtk instead of /usr/bin/vim -> /usr/bin/vim.gtk ? Someone's choice of a vi-like editor would be considered configuration, so it belongs in /etc. I agree, it does sound like a good solution. As simple as possible, but no less. ;) Eric From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 17 03:45:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B831065673 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 03:45:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BD51511D1; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 03:45:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F6408E4.7040901@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:45:40 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120224 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Widger References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Swatch rc script X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 03:45:46 -0000 On 03/15/2012 13:24, Chris Widger wrote: > There's a bug in the rc script for /usr/ports/securit/swatch > > With the bug swatch can be started, but getting status or stopping the > process' always fail. > > To fix this bug I had to change: > > procname=/usr/local/bin/perl > > to: > > procname=/usr/local/bin/swatch > > With this change all instances of swatch start, stop, and report status > correctly. That script shouldn't be using procname at all. It should set command_interpreter on the line after command= -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 17 04:08:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BFC5106566B; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 04:08:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA4314E4D2; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 04:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F640E54.1040401@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:08:52 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120224 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric van Gyzen References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <4F63E809.1080606@FreeBSD.org> <4F63ED21.60302@vangyzen.net> In-Reply-To: <4F63ED21.60302@vangyzen.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Adrian Chadd , Oleg Moskalenko , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Jonathan Anderson , Gabor Kovesdan , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 04:08:54 -0000 On 03/16/2012 18:47, Eric van Gyzen wrote: > On 03/16/2012 08:25 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 03/14/2012 15:14, Jonathan Anderson wrote: >>> In fact, the runtime behaviour of the Debian "alternatives" system is >>> simpler than that: >>> http://segfault.in/2010/04/using-the-debian-alternatives-system/ > [...] >> This sounds like a good solution to more than one problem. Does anyone >> know why they indirect through 2 sets of symlinks? That article doesn't >> touch on the "why?" only the what. > > Do you mean, why do they do > /usr/bin/vim -> /etc/alternatives/vim -> /usr/bin/vim.gtk > instead of > /usr/bin/vim -> /usr/bin/vim.gtk > ? > > Someone's choice of a vi-like editor would be considered configuration, > so it belongs in /etc. If that's the *only* reason then it seems to me that it would be better solved by being able to express that in a config file in /usr/local/etc which the alternate-updater script takes into account. But I need to install debian for other reasons anyway, so I'll look at this in more detail. Thanks. -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 17 04:23:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842F5106566B for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 04:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D198FC20 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 04:23:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wern13 with SMTP id n13so5890983wer.13 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:23:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CPUqFaz6pVmUkRy+XBd7/98YAikYx/ndEbAE3lL0aUI=; b=APD4MS7DEqabR9xN1K/zE4DhGWGnc8kWm592b5qWucBQOsSiWOnaTL9II3ZV3RHiBO Vk2EHtYxg5t2Uh+Vrdi5odpWkxpkVkX+35GNdoifa6jjrnPewBlh7sBxyDm0uzwJ75+5 L5sQ6CMUrzIQRzxUwqn28xGuH4x00eidW3BdUycETuKhzKldNfB1fqpP9v2NB1H7yNN9 s9OtnK0Hlvk+cZ5i4EWp9kUUQrX4WpR0vBKjdGveTr2CvS/MUyN+3K1rECgSNMlqpgKf wsLika1JPqDYZITk/lSHOFUgTOr4EJ2eKvXTcETwdNngxw8hOc9o1PPWvmDfb8EWvFpK yFTA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.105.69 with SMTP id gk5mr4401322wib.3.1331958232019; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:23:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.106.42 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:23:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 04:23:51 +0000 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: Jeremy Messenger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lang/lua: It does need gmake. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 04:23:53 -0000 On 3/16/12, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:49 AM, b. f. wrote: >> Jeremy Messenger wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: >>> > On Mar 15, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >>> >> Figured out. Add custom CFLAGS in the make.conf and you will get a >>> >> build failure with make but not gmake. Here's what I have in my >>> >> make.conf: >>> >> >>> >> CFLAGS= -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -g >>> >> STRIP= >>> > >>> > Does it work properly if you use "CFLAGS+=" instead? >>> >>> It will, but you do not need to put '+' in make.conf. I have same >>> CFLAGS for years and years, btw. >> >> If you have been making these assignments unconditionally, then for >> years and years you have been in danger of breaking or damaging the >> builds for many ports that explicitly invoke make(1) more than once >> (and thus read make.conf more than once), by clobbering prior changes >> to CFLAGS or STRIP that are made in port makefiles. Despite the >> misleading examples in the base-system example make.conf, this kind of >> customization is not supported for Ports, and not encouraged. You >> should take steps to ensure that your custom values are set only once, >> before any top-level port Makefile is parsed. You can define them >> conditionally, or move them to another makefile that is included only >> once, or disable multiple inclusions of make.conf for Ports by using >> something like "__MAKE_CONF=/dev/null" in the right place. > > Any ports have to respect the CFLAGS, see the porter handbook. If it > fails to do then it needs to be fixed. Add '+' in the make.conf is not > right way to do it as it's merely add in exists CFLAGS. What we actually require is that if you pass a reasonable set of CFLAGS to the top-level of a port build, in the environment or an included makefile, then the port uses those flags, *with as few additions or changes as may be necessary to successfully build the port*. It does *not* necessarily mean that the port will only use the user-defined CFLAGS, and very few ports do so -- most ports make reasonable and necessary changes to the flags for parts of the port, either in the port Makefile, the included makefiles in ports/Mk, or the distribution makefiles. These changes may be contained in CFLAGS or another variable, or they may be explicit. They typically include aliasing switches, rpath instructions, changes to the search directories for headers and libraries, parameter definitions, PIC-related flags, etc. The fact that ports can alter CFLAGS itself is explicitly mentioned in the Porter's Handbook, and is evident in the ports infrastructure: ports/Mk makefiles routinely alter CFLAGS; CFLAGS are typically passed to distribution makefiles in MAKE_ENV, not in MAKE_ARGS, so that they will be mutable in those makefiles; etc. I think that this should be clear to a committer of your experience. As I wrote before, your unconditional assignment of CFLAGS in make.conf can break or damage many ports, and you should not ask or expect port maintainers to add unnecessary patches to ports in order to support this unsafe practice. I already mentioned several ways in which you can safely customize the CFLAGS (without "+=") in my previous message. > > mandree, thanks for took care of it! > On the contrary, the port is now damaged. This is a good example of the harmful consequences of make.conf abuse. lang/lua now confusingly and unnecessarily passes CFLAGS to the distribution makefiles both in the environment and on the command-line. More importantly, the CFLAGS+= -Wall $(MYCFLAGS) in ${WRKSRC}/src/Makefile no longer works, because adding CFLAGS to MAKE_ARGS has made CFLAGS immutable in the distribution makefiles. This means that the components are built without -DLUA_USE_LINUX, so functionality has been removed from the port. This change should be reverted. b. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 17 10:27:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE16D106564A; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 10:27:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F268FC1A; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 10:27:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2HAR79B051944; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 10:27:07 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2HAR6ts051943; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 10:27:06 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 11:27:02 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20120317102702.GC83408@azathoth.lan> References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <4F63E809.1080606@FreeBSD.org> <4F63ED21.60302@vangyzen.net> <4F640E54.1040401@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TYecfFk8j8mZq+dy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F640E54.1040401@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Adrian Chadd , Eric van Gyzen , Oleg Moskalenko , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Gabor Kovesdan , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Jonathan Anderson Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 10:27:07 -0000 --TYecfFk8j8mZq+dy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:08:52PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 03/16/2012 18:47, Eric van Gyzen wrote: > > On 03/16/2012 08:25 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > >> On 03/14/2012 15:14, Jonathan Anderson wrote: > >>> In fact, the runtime behaviour of the Debian "alternatives" system is > >>> simpler than that: > >>> http://segfault.in/2010/04/using-the-debian-alternatives-system/ > > [...] > >> This sounds like a good solution to more than one problem. Does anyone > >> know why they indirect through 2 sets of symlinks? That article doesn't > >> touch on the "why?" only the what. > >=20 > > Do you mean, why do they do > > /usr/bin/vim -> /etc/alternatives/vim -> /usr/bin/vim.gtk > > instead of > > /usr/bin/vim -> /usr/bin/vim.gtk > > ? > >=20 > > Someone's choice of a vi-like editor would be considered configuration, > > so it belongs in /etc. >=20 > If that's the *only* reason then it seems to me that it would be better > solved by being able to express that in a config file in /usr/local/etc > which the alternate-updater script takes into account. But I need to > install debian for other reasons anyway, so I'll look at this in more > detail. Thanks. >=20 As I already said I started working on something equivalent for freebsd: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/alternative.txt but never found time to fin= ish. Why to symlink, this is 1/ because it concerns user/admin configuration, 2 = it allows to change it even with your /usr/local/bin mounted RO. regards, Bapt --TYecfFk8j8mZq+dy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk9kZvUACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwmWACgms2qPCVdeEmcCEh0+s6zgl6o kjUAoLjl6CzO+5OR42m4nAx0v+iOdpDK =MAdC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TYecfFk8j8mZq+dy-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 17 16:34:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0FE1065674 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 16:34:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from levi@toya.net.pl) Received: from mailt.toya.net.pl (mailt.toya.net.pl [217.113.224.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D5C8FC08 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 16:34:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.toya.net.pl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.toya.net.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C042000098E for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 17:34:39 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.toya.net.pl (Postfix, from userid 5001) id DC10E2000098B; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 17:34:39 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mail.toya.net.pl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from [85.89.177.115] (staticline1060.toya.net.pl [85.89.177.115]) (Authenticated sender: levi@toya.net.pl) by mail.toya.net.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5804C20000988; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 17:34:36 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F64BD12.1070802@toya.net.pl> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 17:34:26 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?xYF1a2Fzeg==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: i@levsha.me Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:12:11 +0000 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: liquidsoap-0.9.3_1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 16:34:41 -0000 Could you be kind and make a new port for liquidsoap 1.0 ? thank you :) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 17 20:43:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810B9106564A for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 20:43:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from i@levsha.me) Received: from expo.ukrweb.net (mail.univua.net [91.202.128.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E967B8FC0A for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 20:43:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [46.201.104.43] (helo=laptop.levsha.me) by expo.ukrweb.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1S90TO-000KPN-L0; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 22:43:37 +0200 Received: from levsha by laptop.levsha.me with local (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1S90TH-000IWQ-SP; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 22:43:27 +0200 Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 22:43:27 +0200 From: Mykola Dzham To: =?utf-8?Q?=C5=81ukasz?= Message-ID: <20120317204327.GA5270@laptop.levsha.me> References: <4F64BD12.1070802@toya.net.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4F64BD12.1070802@toya.net.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: Mykola Dzham X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 46.201.104.43 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: i@levsha.me X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on expo.ukrweb.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Level: -- X-Spam-Report: -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0002] Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: liquidsoap-0.9.3_1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 20:43:39 -0000 Łukasz wrote: > Could you be kind and make a new port for liquidsoap 1.0 ? > thank you :) I'm submitted port update: ports/165932 Sorry for too long delay: many changes in release and little free time :( -- LEFT-(UANIC|RIPE) JID: levsha@jabber.net.ua PGP fingerprint: 1BCD 7C80 2E04 7282 C944 B0E0 7E67 619E 4E72 9280 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 17 21:26:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C04D106564A for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 21:26:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E075F8FC0C for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 21:26:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhq7 with SMTP id hq7so1832695wib.13 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 14:26:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a5SxEgrQ2pfPkFlq6GD0BOT6GbMxgJE2s4eUJcBvHWc=; b=rd+421E/H9aPH1mf1U8ap/MW4YEGsmTbo7EkOkuD+O15e2VXu0wITvt+gxuGlEDjA3 gx38c3NW3XYTeJ3A24F4sBwKX47nlP9Ggy9Al4pU1Uwt4zX5ET0b9XbfRykbirPRlmbu mrrLFdmtpYXTxzFo9Rh7ik5OqNz4WOnbb6as4TltrPBmIX4yI1UpF3eno7pyD4TUQ3pw I4ambB4FKMSRK1GLiJ+wC0CMQoq5uoZ0RI3eIYWNp9ztrC0ZclIZ/pnumD8xPEL9K+ho OYAxvPw+gYl0hJu7kwIK+wGtWb7tPl0AdIGfzwQ6hmauXAxtPddJQIzqnMbvTJy7kXEn qJng== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.101.230 with SMTP id fj6mr8448264wib.13.1332019563957; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 14:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: r.c.ladan@gmail.com Received: by 10.180.88.3 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 14:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 22:26:03 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qZz6SbLj7Y__IyqzJIXKkXVynb0 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?= To: freebsd ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: ROS (robot operating system) ports [team?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 21:26:05 -0000 Hi, Some (somewhat brain dump mode) thoughts about the ROS (devel/ros*) ports [1] below: - are there people who would be interested in forming a team? Together with Chromium, Xfce, the Dutch translations, and "real life" this becomes a bit too much for one person (I guess I underestimated the effort :( ). Although the currently ported release (1.4) is still supported upstream, release 1.6 has been there for some months - since the ROS ecosystem and therefore the units in which these are packaged seem get more finegrained at each release (1.0, 1.2, .. 1.8 which should be out soon), the question arises whether to keep just the software originally planned (devel/ros-tutorials and devel/ros-nxt [2] + dependencies) or also the software split off (which means more ports, more testing, and more repocopies). - because of the nature of the software, all ports need to be updated to the next release in one commit to avoid breakage, although new ports could be committed earlier as long as they are not connected to the build. - a generally positive development is that each release decreases the amount of third party software built-in (this depends on the status of several Linux distributions), but that also means that some newly required third party might not be ported to FreeBSD yet and thus even more ports to maintain. - there is a lot more ROS software out there (enough for around 2000 ports), but some of it is only useful when run on the robots intended. Obviously way too much for one person. [1] ftp://rene-ladan.nl/pub/ros-freebsd.pdf [2] http://www.ros.org/wiki/nxt (ROS bindings for the LEGO NXT robot) Ren=E9 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 17 23:34:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2B3106566C; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 23:34:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339DD14F0B9; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 23:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F651F86.40200@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 16:34:30 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120218 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <4F63E809.1080606@FreeBSD.org> <4F63ED21.60302@vangyzen.net> <4F640E54.1040401@FreeBSD.org> <20120317102702.GC83408@azathoth.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120317102702.GC83408@azathoth.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Adrian Chadd , Eric van Gyzen , Oleg Moskalenko , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Gabor Kovesdan , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Jonathan Anderson Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 23:34:32 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 03/17/2012 03:27, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Why to symlink, this is 1/ because it concerns user/admin > configuration, I get that, but why is a conf file not the right answer? We could even put the conf file in /etc if we decide that this is a feature that should be in the base. Having 2 symlinks just seems like overkill. > 2 it allows to change it even with your /usr/local/bin mounted RO. I don't understand this bit, sorry. Aren't we talking about symlinks in / and /usr pointing to alternate versions in either /, /usr, or /usr/local? I don't see how anything would need to be written in /usr/local with either 1 symlink or 2. Doug - -- This .signature sanitized for your protection -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPZR+GAAoJEFzGhvEaGryER/sH/A8nuMDQ18cmm1OkboCn1ZKY DFb8THBfCwiXlpN7VYqz6YaYwumIooTO6108sKPbBoC3UPE7sZN7F9ENFbihkYrg Gq3YPhn6h6Wkvt61s+2Om/fkJEUQvy0u+9WMJE5YExBKpeIBMSxkhmTj9B7WKfS5 hONNUVWww4pSvBF4eMCTf41mtI54jlsOrPZYJofTMvOc26T8qLlzgJEPLp+uAlOx /92rRcKklIkLokUzWzFO/XdnmzqkpeLw0Oo46iIWer/4uFUzQl5+WcJ+kDwykRzB l2Oai0X5IOA/YKuEsToVvLOydBpZ2uBqgfSEe5Hzn2P0Vts/i5ckVHqFN5txPkw= =Jvry -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----