From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 00:15:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B61106566C for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 00:15:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@dataix.net) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469598FC21 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 00:15:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so8486302iah.13 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:15:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dataix.net; s=rsa; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-disposition; bh=bTj3gcekUH1El3k8a+d14DI7Zsw+eVK7J2TS87/xgWo=; b=P/1B34dOljLX3/5xn62y/xvtr9gARkMP4Bf5TYmJ2lcRufLs5NRZ5wa0kPx0ztrn1m Pukr8V51j4jOyH60DwpE0BsDXB9pU5M/9zsiFroJq6nEQ4uQgm/0bbpP3JLL0hovsgsA uHL+nwRiX3mVR/clvfvG6Y5qovr6MVu4zUOsE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :in-reply-to:x-gm-message-state:content-type:content-disposition; bh=bTj3gcekUH1El3k8a+d14DI7Zsw+eVK7J2TS87/xgWo=; b=YaCq3WDeDehVAeickcqfUazDy6U25JrxV7QLw0zv+JUpkEycQnQLLqhvtmCP+TlUrq tB0xGdhKWFZu9cLWCeJTMbWR25CdxPKSZ8vErBb3CkcdY7+wivQsnnAohuhC+wwD7Wd1 toj7/K6Q5krdnBDsV7gPQHl/vCxrzpaL5Uk6cgwkFGS9HlgTOQUXMbknFNt1iAeHKfp5 CN9fdfquwb9pVZIgWoBFxMpTE3WHBJkCwKP8Lq1sLKhL1a+Zz9X6Tdiif2pEy24pgK34 X5AOHx0nZ5R1Ssc13z53ZpBlxReEAWo5ebHq8e8yqOF0+4P05cP/sol7Gp5Y0w5KQtlT nD3Q== Received: by 10.50.158.234 with SMTP id wx10mr2309257igb.71.1332634509737; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:15:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (adsl-99-181-142-190.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net. [99.181.142.190]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id rd7sm6851016igb.14.2012.03.24.17.15.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:15:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2P0F6DF036932 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 24 Mar 2012 20:15:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Received: (from jhellenthal@localhost) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2P0F65Y036849; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 20:15:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 20:15:06 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20120325001506.GA24159@DataIX.net> References: <20120323154105.GB84340@DataIX.net> <4F6E40BC.6020400@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4F6E40BC.6020400@FreeBSD.org> X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnBmEVORbvUzEWIcq8hS/7QMHIjuQwznw9b2P+YyKXWWJvexR92qV2zbv/75T9/2FEviKhZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: named/bind98... rather ports usage and base interaction. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 00:15:10 -0000 On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 02:46:36PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 3/23/2012 8:41 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > > > Hey Doug, > > > > Do you know of anything we could do to stop the following from happening > > ? > > Yes, see below. > > > If you set world to build without BIND and it is your intention to use > > bind from ports... upon running (make delete-old) > > I don't like the delete-old stuff, and make no efforts to support it. > That said, the solution to your problem is to not use WITHOUT_BIND, but > to use the various other WITHOUT_BIND_* knobs, except for > WITHOUT_BIND_ETC. Yes, this is clunky; no, I have no plans to change it. > Jeeze that was simpler than I thought it was going to be... Thanks! Doug > > hth, > > Doug > > -- > > This .signature sanitized for your protection -- ;s =; From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 00:43:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52DB51065673 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 00:43:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from skvortsov42@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4548FC14 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 00:43:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wern13 with SMTP id n13so4598113wer.13 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:43:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=vsLCloPU7kMPqnYRJWIPbkG/Zlf5cAiOXPimFkePKUk=; b=D/omlPudqcOXSD7/buqS48psqETENua+ab+eFXu2jNnBewzm4DTxyHVVJxxP0eZgOH ivo2RVje1cg4jzAZ7ieiy2OugWeJVip1Ix9Uv978uHwDtdcXPkvDwxJtBm+CHgd/3oJ+ mxVGXn4sMh03LzBPpHCkCzvbMBa82XR5xva1THWM/x4pIVNH8lQske43FKiODEgarfut v8IGdX4R4ihGQdyqU7FwVXoFKkbPJZAODvVAYLSdKAeV7dnk7tEmLFqHn3V9J5QaKSRR kxnEDPFYBXky5JS3qhmmlWBUkDwzKSWs8VsdxzNOzD+XbplhlcU0/PBa0P+dDDVC9Wn1 4Wcw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.106.9 with SMTP id gq9mr7839350wib.17.1332636224859; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:43:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.143.222 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:43:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120322194736.196f72e7@scorpio> References: <4F6B5A9F.1070006@freebsd.org> <20120322194736.196f72e7@scorpio> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:43:44 -0700 Message-ID: From: Chris To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: What about Firefox 11? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 00:43:46 -0000 On 3/22/12, Jerry wrote: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:00:15 +0100 > Florian Smeets articulated: > >> Yes, after the ports freeze. We decided to stay with firefox 10.0.x >> for now and update www/firefox to 11 after the FreeBSD 8.3 release is >> out. > > Considering that Firefox is in a race to get to version 20 before the > Mayan Doomsday December 21, I think you should revise that to at least > Firefox 12 or better. Is there any chance of the 10-ESR release being turned into its own port? Some of us hate the way Mozilla devs keep changing the interface between versions, and the ESR release should make Firefox updates less painful for a year or so. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 02:42:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B3A71065678 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 02:42:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rocky@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C9D8FC16 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 02:42:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D7C15C22; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:56:23 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F6E8629.3080909@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:42:49 +1000 From: R Skinner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Wolfskill , FreeBSD Ports References: <4F6DC852.2080401@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120324133102.GF1525@albert.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <20120324133102.GF1525@albert.catwhisker.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: FFMpeg port video4linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 02:42:51 -0000 On 03/24/12 23:31, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 11:12:50PM +1000, R Skinner wrote: >> I'm at a loss here; I could be tired, but I cant find if video4linux >> has been enabled in ffmpeg (or disabled). There's nothing in the >> makefile either. For the life of me I cannot get it use a webcamd device >> - all I get is "unknown input format". >> >> I'm using ffplay (not that should make a difference here), and this is >> the cmd: >> >> $ffplay -f video4linux2 /dev/video0 >> >> Just "video4linux" fails similarly. >> ... >> Can anyone point me to how to get this to work? Or why it doesn't? What >> do I need to do to make this happen? > This may be a usefule clue: > > g1-227(9.0-S)[1] cd /usr/ports/multimedia/ > g1-227(9.0-S)[2] make search key=video4linux > Port: libv4l-0.8.4_1 > Path: /usr/ports/multimedia/libv4l > Info: Video4Linux library > Maint: hselasky@FreeBSD.org > B-deps: gettext-0.18.1.1 gmake-3.82 jpeg-8_3 libiconv-1.13.1_2 v4l_compat-1.0.20110720 > R-deps: jpeg-8_3 > WWW: http://freshmeat.net/projects/libv4l > > Port: linux-f10-libv4l-0.6.2 > Path: /usr/ports/multimedia/linux-f10-libv4l > Info: Collection of video4linux support libraries (Fedora 10) > Maint: emulation@FreeBSD.org > B-deps: > R-deps: linux_base-f10-10_4 > WWW: http://hansdegoede.livejournal.com/3636.html > > Port: pwcview-1.4.1_4 > Path: /usr/ports/multimedia/pwcview > Info: The Video4Linux PWC webcam viewer > Maint: hselasky@FreeBSD.org > B-deps: aalib-1.4.r5_6 damageproto-1.2.1 dri2proto-2.3 expat-2.0.1_2 fixesproto-5.0 jpeg-8_3 kbproto-1.0.5 libGL-7.4.4 libGLU-7.4.4 libX11-1.4.4,1 libXau-1.0.6 libXdamage-1.1.3 libXdmcp-1.1.0 libXext-1.3.0_1,1 libXfixes-5.0 libXrandr-1.3.2 libXrender-0.9.6 libXxf86vm-1.1.1 libdrm-2.4.12_1 libiconv-1.13.1_2 libpthread-stubs-0.3_3 libv4l-0.8.4_1 libxcb-1.7 pkg-config-0.25_1 randrproto-1.3.2 renderproto-0.11.1 sdl-1.2.15,2 v4l_compat-1.0.20110720 xextproto-7.2.0 xf86vidmodeproto-2.3.1 xproto-7.0.22 > R-deps: aalib-1.4.r5_6 damageproto-1.2.1 dri2proto-2.3 expat-2.0.1_2 fixesproto-5.0 jpeg-8_3 kbproto-1.0.5 libGL-7.4.4 libGLU-7.4.4 libX11-1.4.4,1 libXau-1.0.6 libXdamage-1.1.3 libXdmcp-1.1.0 libXext-1.3.0_1,1 libXfixes-5.0 libXrandr-1.3.2 libXrender-0.9.6 libXxf86vm-1.1.1 libdrm-2.4.12_1 libiconv-1.13.1_2 libpthread-stubs-0.3_3 libv4l-0.8.4_1 libxcb-1.7 pkg-config-0.25_1 randrproto-1.3.2 renderproto-0.11.1 sdl-1.2.15,2 xextproto-7.2.0 xf86vidmodeproto-2.3.1 xproto-7.0.22 > WWW: http://raaf.atspace.org/ > > Port: v4l-utils-0.8.4 > Path: /usr/ports/multimedia/v4l-utils > Info: Video4Linux utilities > Maint: nox@FreeBSD.org > B-deps: argp-standalone-1.3_2 gettext-0.18.1.1 gmake-3.82 jpeg-8_3 libiconv-1.13.1_2 libv4l-0.8.4_1 v4l_compat-1.0.20110720 > R-deps: argp-standalone-1.3_2 jpeg-8_3 libv4l-0.8.4_1 > WWW: http://freshmeat.net/projects/libv4l > > Port: v4l_compat-1.0.20110720 > Path: /usr/ports/multimedia/v4l_compat > Info: Video4Linux IOCTL header files > Maint: multimedia@FreeBSD.org > B-deps: > R-deps: > WWW: > > g1-227(9.0-S)[3] I appreciate that, but if it was that simple I would not have asked. I have both libv4l and v4l_compat installed already, but if not then ffmpeg should have installed them anyway. This lies in the ffmpeg build somewhere; it should be automatically enabled but somehow it is missed... There is no --enable-indev in the configure script, just disable. So where else should I be looking? Why would it be disabled (not in the Makefile BTW)? Cheers From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 02:45:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E75E106566C for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 02:45:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luizgustavo@luizgustavo.pro.br) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11CB8FC08 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 02:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl9 with SMTP id l9so4089878yen.13 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:45:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=6VkUmogFhmajAEh+x0rAgDHWLE5b99rmqCa4/I98msI=; b=Q83y47xJMBzyhZTFhz578AlPLBqAk2ri0uVexYOP0DvFbfKxeyovH3nwWha3vOuF3R d8kShuCbuDws1gr5el2zOUnoQqY1KMCu7k8kZTpzPxRSNsjf6PrY77Hy4dPE94d4AbLE iTXRgwTUuDBeI+hgtXgsSQjw/M6Wh8T0qwC7FKb1zEnySfClcJlitur9xX559piI9+gV IIrexEeKCnEj0dtk544pqF5i0am6zxJY4VCNFF1eK6pgFiLMoCGHSi3/p2vj8/AK2hFu dbsj8UiYM8uN7Q3B4JrQwQU5MxCRJKM7zX5UXbZ9obtI05OLAAw2c4DfUqG9EiRfLVoT tYGw== Received: by 10.236.136.4 with SMTP id v4mr17324431yhi.44.1332643506033; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from desktop ([187.108.176.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q14sm16521053anj.9.2012.03.24.19.45.03 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:45:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 23:49:49 -0300 From: Luiz Gustavo To: Jason Helfman Message-Id: <20120324234949.80c6736b.luizgustavo@luizgustavo.pro.br> In-Reply-To: <20120324214625.GB34210@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> References: <20120324013050.e387433f.luizgustavo@luizgustavo.pro.br> <20120324115505.730b6480.luizgustavo@luizgustavo.pro.br> <20120324214625.GB34210@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.3 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk4xje3jJV+tXmorLEsJhb3nq9e9MiEoIxHm+CgO1sgvPIq6oB//wXsEuRYu+UtLG6ndkWW Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: luakit port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 02:45:07 -0000 On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:46:25 -0700 Jason Helfman wrote: > On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 11:55:05AM -0300, Luiz Gustavo thus spake: > >On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 01:30:50 -0300 > >Luiz Gustavo wrote: > > > >> Hi List ! > >> > >> This is my first port, then please do not mind if you find any errors, I'm still learning how to create ports ;) > >> > >> This port is of Luakit (www.luakit.org). Is a light browser (see pkg-desc): > >> > >> Luakit is a highly configurable, micro-browser framework based on the WebKit web content engine and the GTK+ toolkit. It is very fast, extensible by Lua and licensed under the GNU GPLv3 license. It is primarily targeted at power users, developers and any people with too much time on their hands who want to have fine-grained control over their web browsers behaviour and interface. > >> > >> WWW: http://luakit.org > >> > >> Please, test this port and if someone wants to adopt and commit to do, I'll be happy! > >> > >> Source: http://mundounix.com.br/~gugabsd/luakit-ports.tar.gz > >> > >> PS: Very thanks garga, is a nice tool !!! > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> --- > >> Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD) > >> *+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+ > >> mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre > >> http://www.mundounix.com.br > >> ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: contato@mundounix.com.br > >> Tel: 55 (21) 4063-7110 / 8194-1905 / (11) 4063-0407 > >> Blog: http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br > > > >For a better development, i make a new repository for this ports: > > > >https://bitbucket.org/gugabsd/freebsd_ports/downloads > > > >Thanks ! > > > >--- > >Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD) > > This may be committed more speedily if you follow the recommended path for > submitting new ports. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting.html > > Nonetheless, thank you for all the work on this! > -jgh > > -- > Jason Helfman > System Administrator > experts-exchange.com > http://www.experts-exchange.com/M_4830110.html > E4AD 7CF1 1396 27F6 79DD 4342 5E92 AD66 8C8C FBA5 Hi Jason, Thanks for you attention. I already sent a new a new PR for this. I'm learning ;) --- Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD) *+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+ mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre http://www.mundounix.com.br ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: contato@mundounix.com.br Tel: 55 (21) 4063-7110 / 8194-1905 / (11) 4063-0407 Blog: http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 03:58:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F05E106566C; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 03:58:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from marvin.chruetertee.ch (marvin.chruetertee.ch [217.150.245.55]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2632B8FC12; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 03:58:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.11.78] (197.214.32.202.bf.2iij.net [202.32.214.197]) (authenticated bits=0) by marvin.chruetertee.ch (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2P3wBiK080540 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 25 Mar 2012 03:58:19 GMT (envelope-from beat@FreeBSD.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beat_G=E4tzi?= In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 05:58:07 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <4F6B5A9F.1070006@freebsd.org> <20120322194736.196f72e7@scorpio> To: Chris X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: What about Firefox 11? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 03:58:27 -0000 On Mar 25, 2012, at 1:43 AM, Chris wrote: > On 3/22/12, Jerry wrote: >> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:00:15 +0100 >> Florian Smeets articulated: >> >>> Yes, after the ports freeze. We decided to stay with firefox 10.0.x >>> for now and update www/firefox to 11 after the FreeBSD 8.3 release is >>> out. >> >> Considering that Firefox is in a race to get to version 20 before the >> Mayan Doomsday December 21, I think you should revise that to at least >> Firefox 12 or better. > > Is there any chance of the 10-ESR release being turned into its own > port? Yes, there is: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/165790 HTH, Beat From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 05:13:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554C1106566B for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 05:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@dataix.net) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0985C8FC12 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 05:13:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so8669639iah.13 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:13:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dataix.net; s=rsa; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CIj+ruImqKykKVGGE0vzxyogsFYV+aAGvALaAJd9+zU=; b=MTolgWmp/VEGnLhGDXORhGDOEQfQ6ouF8974zlNz4Py58r3QcRIRujnoayE0NW5VIz JeAMNJUrRIqLUrWV4NzcmyPw2hrxKWjMNWrKk5ywltD5lbBc0ebanwCY+h7En/ks8xtf RlstghLaJDrvrwKWsWySBxpNoLCC0+T6HKpuc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-gm-message-state; bh=CIj+ruImqKykKVGGE0vzxyogsFYV+aAGvALaAJd9+zU=; b=Dmal5Q/GP94mdDWqnfWXwKiKMiaIh22rfW6BeUL+FZ0rA6xpi2J14c1BTYXJcDZZ/J SdPzWjkHNG6p/1Z/+ONTXwSOkX/ka01SwjpuRduX9sltbqcJ00VbwgXpsOECG2e7nPJA uRKyRo6JReiFOQL2o7XOSnIL6HQe5+xCkYT7uQngf4WoTgJ7vpRm3Cup2Sbft49uVgtF DzfGMe0DVy/r8ChD9cu6Djbb345w9WSRWEJIfKIY0kxAXkdv3hRUrbhzuYuvqJgAnkHI Mp73ys2b7pshUazZPVnjzPp4SbSeMOf1QixJ8s0DJ0odDOMDGTY1owqxxKqsbDM6S9xj cGhA== Received: by 10.42.150.131 with SMTP id a3mr2335713icw.6.1332652383594; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (adsl-99-181-142-190.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net. [99.181.142.190]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ba4sm10443190igb.14.2012.03.24.22.13.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:13:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2P5D0H4085085 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 25 Mar 2012 01:13:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Received: (from jhellenthal@localhost) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2P5D0Nb084793; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 01:13:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 01:13:00 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20120325051300.GA78476@DataIX.net> References: <20120323154105.GB84340@DataIX.net> <4F6E40BC.6020400@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F6E40BC.6020400@FreeBSD.org> X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmQ5t0FeYxvHctomCvRffIu+zLkCHZ7PUrVpxwMmyxmcVx5qhPHhnv87/No39u5PbWRTHPh Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: named/bind98... rather ports usage and base interaction. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 05:13:04 -0000 On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 02:46:36PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 3/23/2012 8:41 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > > > Hey Doug, > > > > Do you know of anything we could do to stop the following from happening > > ? > > Yes, see below. > > > If you set world to build without BIND and it is your intention to use > > bind from ports... upon running (make delete-old) > > I don't like the delete-old stuff, and make no efforts to support it. > That said, the solution to your problem is to not use WITHOUT_BIND, but > to use the various other WITHOUT_BIND_* knobs, except for > WITHOUT_BIND_ETC. Yes, this is clunky; no, I have no plans to change it. > > Just to followup and say thanks again... This is what I was looking for. I ended up with just these to accomplish what I wanted on stable/8 machines: /etc/src.conf WITHOUT_BIND_DNSSEC=YES WITHOUT_BIND_LIBS_LWRES=YES WITHOUT_BIND_NAMED=YES WITHOUT_BIND_UTILS=YES And did not use: WITHOUT_BIND_ETC WITHOUT_BIND_MTREE Works as expected. Thanks again Doug. -- ;s =; From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 06:07:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D24106566B for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 06:07:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4078FC14 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 06:07:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SBgbW-0000sU-KV for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 08:07:02 +0200 Received: from g224054105.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.224.54.105]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 08:07:02 +0200 Received: from rotkap by g224054105.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 08:07:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Heino Tiedemann Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 08:06:16 +0200 Organization: yes Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <4F6B5A9F.1070006@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: g224054105.adsl.alicedsl.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (berkeley-unix) X-Face: v6Lci{Mw=kwHf$`7C?L-U#BHn7O\wqF-1qg#Vk%}nUQv\i^mM/.p=wU+cr)yXf#Ob+foOOxW; ir"QI!|25wG3`ywF)yh~@V.kKtr.qp+v.R; w?c@ZzM#!'/7r_+)$NjMN:]qo-]`&z~KlP}|cERO'%s9":6\ZnN/O List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 06:07:11 -0000 Florian Smeets wrote: > On 22.03.2012 17:54, Heino Tiedemann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> Firefox 11 is out! >> >> Is there a time line oder a date when it comes into ports? >> > > Yes, after the ports freeze. We decided to stay with firefox 10.0.x for > now and update www/firefox to 11 after the FreeBSD 8.3 release is out. thank you fpr information. > For those who cannot wait we are always looking for testes ;) > > svn co > https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/freebsd-gecko/branches/experimental/www/firefox/ I asked because auf the "new way" to show stand allone Images (on a neutral grey backgruund). For that I use seamonkey - until firefox 11 comes :) Heino From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 10:31:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7576106566C for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 10:31:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7948FC19 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 10:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A62E5C29 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 20:44:58 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F6EF3FA.7050809@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 20:31:22 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F6B5A9F.1070006@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: What about Firefox 11? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 10:31:25 -0000 On 03/25/12 16:06, Heino Tiedemann wrote: > Florian Smeets wrote: > > >> For those who cannot wait we are always looking for testes ;) >> >> svn co >> https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/freebsd-gecko/branches/experimental/www/firefox/ >> LOL. Do you mean those with the balls enough to try it out? Or is that a typo? :) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 12:51:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA87106566B; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:51:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hsn@filez.com) Received: from ponto.amerinoc.com (ponto.amerinoc.com [64.6.108.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59AD18FC18; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fbsd8.localdomain (205.83.broadband7.iol.cz [88.102.83.205]) (authenticated bits=128) by ponto.amerinoc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2PCp6jU015733 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:51:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hsn@filez.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.0.0.1]) by fbsd8.localdomain (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2PCp0uP040183; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:51:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hsn@filez.com) Message-ID: <4F6F14AF.9070501@filez.com> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:50:55 +0200 From: Radim Kolar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120325-0, 25.03.2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Postgresql 8.2 branch - keep it in tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:51:16 -0000 please do not remove this pgsql branch. its newest branch using old postgresql-contrib full text search engine. Upgrading to 8.3+ is not possible for such applications. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 12:54:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36C3106566C; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBFC8FC17; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so4683927bkc.13 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 05:54:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=h3KXGusuXF7j4h5LDJvUww2nRaaD5SESTqD64xMV8Tw=; b=ybDUBeewagsiCbI9yNdAadxaQCtw7xYVe50JOo4qadjYN9LD/sJtud8V+hhcfZfqdn xtG3cnmYx9aED24/qAf1Y2gvG5700xD2JEZk83PGpew8THMWQlh7zW9WvSwDSpvv5eol jqlw5sn40TKyyLrp3UdGXw+DrV88FWJYzKR/RRy64MMBaUFctKg3E+u1jJWNFkOgHlrv waAC64dyP5HZcZyQnXoklMsXGSEQ7H1DwdFlN4D8lj33WjTKWcI/nSkp4kDbOCl/JWFS oQwFnOoLOz9/25irH3RTn/3JWF0dB7iMvklEoNIy48t41l+UluL3sFZpPCkZnbcuQlXL 2Ktg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.141.25 with SMTP id k25mr7080463bku.72.1332680076628; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 05:54:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 05:54:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 05:54:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F6F14AF.9070501@filez.com> References: <4F6F14AF.9070501@filez.com> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:54:36 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Radim Kolar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pgsql@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Postgresql 8.2 branch - keep it in tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:54:44 -0000 On 25 Mar 2012 13:51, "Radim Kolar" wrote: > > please do not remove this pgsql branch. its newest branch using old postgresql-contrib full text search engine. Upgrading to 8.3+ is not possible for such applications. I'm afraid it's not only end of life by upstream, but also vulnerable in more than one CVE, and will not be fixed. Can you give more detail on exactly what you are trying to do? Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 15:18:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BFB106566B; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:18:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from mail.zoral.com.ua (mx0.zoral.com.ua [91.193.166.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC48E8FC1D; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:18:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.zoral.com.ua (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q2PFIGPk028792; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:18:16 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2PFIG5Z017143; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:18:16 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2PFIGLb017142; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:18:16 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:18:16 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Chris Rees Message-ID: <20120325151816.GZ2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <4F6F14AF.9070501@filez.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lBe/Si07TENnq+bY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pgsql@freebsd.org, Radim Kolar Subject: Re: Postgresql 8.2 branch - keep it in tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:18:30 -0000 --lBe/Si07TENnq+bY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 12:54:36PM +0000, Chris Rees wrote: > On 25 Mar 2012 13:51, "Radim Kolar" wrote: > > > > please do not remove this pgsql branch. its newest branch using old > postgresql-contrib full text search engine. Upgrading to 8.3+ is not > possible for such applications. >=20 > I'm afraid it's not only end of life by upstream, but also vulnerable in > more than one CVE, and will not be fixed. Why is presence of a CVE relevant for 90% of all port users ? Sigh. >=20 > Can you give more detail on exactly what you are trying to do? >=20 > Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --lBe/Si07TENnq+bY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk9vNzgACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4iJQwCfUEnc/S75IUE24uw2HUzkMYbC da0AoJROBlKra0fw3Vy0yna6f0aALnR1 =LFAa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lBe/Si07TENnq+bY-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 15:26:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50DF5106564A; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:26:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bogorodskiy@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28DC8FC08; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:26:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so4741668bkc.13 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 08:26:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=cX03G2u3rImmWimEy7hs6Wl2uG107TCgJdDE1n2Uo4s=; b=NM6sLkGMUrOXbgJZgRUWPf/dePmxr/EhARJA23lVMhk9UVAUr6f6aZD+fDNsMw+GdB fLW4JLBwuflaREHiUpO7cEH4wcGPaUyWFcCP+NE4EzfgIpSWHB4czde3WdQnyLVYIozg kPPTTKpfOhwvFxgYYVpEW9nzzmVf+9B3xJf+1gi3vWk+xRJUk3eE5LxfcZMQLl7oxWw4 i6cYraLGXozaejS/+twchU1kKHQLQxFEMP581YblnjivJhvLn01eIVsB/Rq4ZwTtNwrw T6n+ybkykcJWSeDq7PcahgNXxgoDvRLfurORfF1997BsoqCBJnCnSjoU1rKOWqNNgvgv jIqw== Received: by 10.205.130.13 with SMTP id hk13mr7163526bkc.26.1332689196718; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 08:26:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kloomba ([95.104.129.104]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z17sm18440217bkw.12.2012.03.25.08.26.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 25 Mar 2012 08:26:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 19:26:34 +0400 From: Roman Bogorodskiy To: Jason Hellenthal Message-ID: <20120325152632.GC1293@kloomba> References: <20120324172937.GA43822@DataIX.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9UV9rz0O2dU/yYYn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120324172937.GA43822@DataIX.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, novel@freebsd.org Subject: Re: security/gnutls update when... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:26:38 -0000 --9UV9rz0O2dU/yYYn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jason Hellenthal wrote: >=20 > Apparently this port has fell two versions behind. Is there anything > that is going to happen to update it to the current stable version ? >=20 >=20 > These advisories have been out for a week now. And the current version > is 2.12.18. >=20 >=20 > Database created: Sat Mar 24 13:15:03 EDT 2012 > Affected package: gnutls-2.12.16 > Type of problem: libtasn1 -- ASN.1 length decoding vulnerability. > Reference: > http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/2e7e9072-73a0-11e1-a883-001cc0a36e12.html >=20 > Affected package: gnutls-2.12.16 > Type of problem: gnutls -- possible overflow/Denial of service > vulnerabilities. > Reference: > http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/aecee357-739e-11e1-a883-001cc0a36e12.html >=20 > 2 problem(s) in your installed packages found. The port was updated to 2.12.18 with some hacks to prevent shlib version bump. Please report if you have any problems with that. Roman Bogorodskiy --9UV9rz0O2dU/yYYn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPbzkoAAoJEMltX/4IwiJqzrUIAMD0SDuqhdQeT36S3fjotpvb Mmri9xsL/3LcBtJMRSGbjXSIbLYQYqwuuilstgw8VpFv3GLx1JPMNswjnJjk4/QA 8Zjs78Q2j2Jj3XezfAwdPtDdGNLteGpmCJ1DqdQF13YdFPQ0/l7WaB8sWg7ATvfr pjkdAFmpsDiDECGXuhhtuZIXqRY3pkqp3ZH9QULT7B0HFt+lxW0i5bMeRF95OSyW lAXbgBan1cdKfn0w7S6KlVrYt2zMXhzeNLyqlyN+H5BYuBV6xDoep0dgDX6e6ZJE 77TaZk/9A1dyCnxJKzQE4XIqTiVgc9JKkMe9Xq0r7cynnL1kt2bApp++IvICeYQ= =nYKS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9UV9rz0O2dU/yYYn-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 16:22:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107001065670 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 16:22:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.scheidell@secnap.com) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7FF8FC1F for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 16:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF53D23C15 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:22:46 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secnap.com; h= mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id:content-type :content-type:content-language:accept-language:message-id:date :date:subject:subject:from:from; s=dkim; t=1332692565; x= 1334506965; bh=XS0b3LlUbFXP3eHpgHTVN0SYiHodsCmRmktT2E+cIig=; b=X pF/syEtpZvXuzmocp3mANH8tqx8RkXeBJaCkFvhgzVG/V8XU85vdoYHgfEvjG3vh CY5nYAXNC3HrVIk9JyI404AH+bqE2Q4X04z3vjQb2ENr/ukk7i57FmIijo6lXfMa rpIqxCGAAWpdFRecpMYMV/N/x48Kii/e4ZXgemL7co= X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3C13D23C06 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:22:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com ([10.70.1.1]) by USBCTDC001 ([10.70.1.1]) with mapi; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:22:45 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell To: "ports@freebsd.org" Thread-Topic: _DEPENDS+= and make index speed Thread-Index: Ac0Ko4IhjDU8R1BLSLy3jtgiSAZp+Q== Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 16:22:57 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <32416fa7-6bf5-43ec-a932-5dbb1b648194> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Subject: _DEPENDS+= and make index speed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 16:22:53 -0000 TWF5YmUgaXQgaXMgYmVjYXVzZSB0aGUgbGFzdCB0d28gcHJzIGluIGEgcm93IGhhZCBpdCBhbmQg dGhhdCBtYWRlIG1lIG5vdGljZSwgb3IgbWF5YmUgSSBhbSBzcGVuZGluZyBtb3JlIHRpbWUgbG9v a2luZyBvdmVyIE1ha2VmaWxlLCBidXQgSSBoYXZlIHNlZW4gYSBjb3VwbGUgb2YgcG9ydHMgd2l0 aCBCVUlMRF9ERVBFTkRTKz0gaW4gY2FzZXMgd2hlcmUgaXQgd2FzIG5vdCBuZWVkZWQuDQoNCldh c24ndCBhIG1hc3RlciBvciBzbGF2ZSBwb3J0LiBXYXMgbm90IHdyYXBwZWQgaW4gYSAuaWZkZWYu ICBwb3J0IGhhZCBubyBvcHRpb25zIHRvIHNlbGVjdCBvciBub3QuDQoNCkkgZG9uJ3QgdGhpbmsg aXQgIGh1cnRzIGFueXRoaW5nIGJ1dCBpZiB5b3UgaGF2ZSBhIGJ1bmNoIG9mIHBvcnRzIGRvaW5n IHRoaXMsIGRvZXNuJ3QgaXQgaGF2ZSB0byBzbG93IGRvd24gbWFrZSBpbmRleD8gVGhlIGV4dHJh IGNoZWNrIGZvciwgcmVhc3NpZ24gYW5kIGNhdCBhbiB1bmRlZmluZWQgdmFyIGhhcyB0byB0YWtl IG1vcmUgY3B1IHRoYW4gYSBzdHJpY3QgYXNzaWduLCByaWdodCBvciBhbSBJIGp1c3Qgbml0cGlj a2luZz8NCg0KTm90aGluZyBJIHRoaW5rIHdlIG5lZWQgdG8gZ28gb24gdGhlIGh1bnQgZm9yIG9y IHB1YmxpY2x5ICBidXQgaXMgaXQgc29tZXRoaW5nIHRoYXQgY29tbWl0dGVycyBhbmQgcG9ydHMg bWFpbnRhaW5lcnMgc2hvdWxkIGp1c3QgZml4PyBSaWdodD8NCg0KDQotLQ0KTWljaGFlbCBTY2hl aWRlbGwsIENUTw0KPnxTRUNOQVAgTmV0d29yayBTZWN1cml0eQ0K From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 17:34:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C95106564A for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 17:34:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720D08FC0A for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 17:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2PHXsgk026343 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:33:54 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q2PHXsgk026343 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q2PHXsgk026343; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none Message-ID: <4F6F56FB.4030704@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:33:47 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig736C26BEFC81B9353F3493B1" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Subject: Re: _DEPENDS+= and make index speed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 17:34:00 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig736C26BEFC81B9353F3493B1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 25/03/2012 17:22, Michael Scheidell wrote: > I don't think it hurts anything but if you have a bunch of ports > doing this, doesn't it have to slow down make index? The extra check > for, reassign and cat an undefined var has to take more cpu than a > strict assign, right or am I just nitpicking? Unlikely to make a significant difference. Most of the time in building the INDEX is spent doing file IO -- opening all those Makefiles, and the files they include, etc., ad nauseam. -- and then parsing the thousands of lines of make code. And then doing all over again for the next port. Couple of assignments using +=3D in a couple of port specific Makefiles isn't much compared to that. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig736C26BEFC81B9353F3493B1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9vVwIACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxGXQCfVkpw8JmYyDLufOKWZ4/+Okuz wu8AnRBohtkP5dQEF9fLoRa2NhVzDkua =i0s8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig736C26BEFC81B9353F3493B1-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 18:29:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F4D106566C for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:29:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ports@webrz.net) Received: from webrz.xs4all.nl (webrz.xs4all.nl [82.95.248.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F02A8FC17 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:29:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webrz.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webrz.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F9A508AE for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 20:25:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.10.10.44] (chimea.webrz.net [10.10.10.44]) by webrz.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B065050855 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 20:25:42 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4F6F6354.4070608@webrz.net> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 20:26:28 +0200 From: Jos Chrispijn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP @triton.webrz.net Subject: FreeBSD 6.4 stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:29:44 -0000 I just re-animated an my old FreeBSD server but have some serious issues with updating my ports collection: fetch: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-6.bz2: Not Found *** Error code 1 I already tried: portupgrade make fetchindex portupgrade make index but every time the first error comes up. Can someone tell me how solve this? regards, Jos Chrispijn From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 18:34:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF4C106564A for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:34:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650EC8FC08 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC68AD23C03 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:34:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4A96D23C01 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:34:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from MikeBook-Air.local (10.80.0.4) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:34:53 -0400 Message-ID: <4F6F6555.1030203@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:35:01 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <4F6F6354.4070608@webrz.net> In-Reply-To: <4F6F6354.4070608@webrz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.4 stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:34:56 -0000 On 3/25/12 2:26 PM, Jos Chrispijn wrote: > I just re-animated an my old FreeBSD server but have some serious > issues with updating my ports collection: > > fetch: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-6.bz2: Not Found > *** Error code 1 > > I already tried: > portupgrade make fetchindex > portupgrade make index > > but every time the first error comes up. Can someone tell me how solve > this? > upgrade to FreeBSD 7.3 or 7.4 6.4 is not supported by ports tree anymore. Not only will you have problems with INDEX, but a lot of ports you want to (re)?build will have dependencies or libraries that don't exist in 6.4. (its not all that painful. build a 7.3/7.4 kernel with 6.x support, install it like 'make kernel KODIR=/boot/testkernel' nextboot -f testkernel (i think that is syntax) if it boots, follow instructions on rebuilding world and ports, make sure you put 7.3/4 kernel back on: make installkernel. if it doesn't boot, well, power cycle and it will boot your old 6.4 (but, ps, strange, I have a test machine still running 6.4 and I test ports on it. never had that issue) but the real answer is, upgrade so you don't have support problems. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 19:45:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369B8106566C for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 19:45:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 782218FC17 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 19:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2012 19:45:06 -0000 Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.0.100]) [87.139.233.65] by mail.gmx.net (mp069) with SMTP; 25 Mar 2012 21:45:06 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1956535 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18GuyhmCeIGK8V5DldPusxLRx32ikvXuDq5sXJ5KK xkL+gTCqjkSlAl Message-ID: <4F6F75C5.7000602@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 21:45:09 +0200 From: olli hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F6F6354.4070608@webrz.net> In-Reply-To: <4F6F6354.4070608@webrz.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Jos Chrispijn Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.4 stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 19:45:08 -0000 On 2012-03-25 20:26, Jos Chrispijn wrote: > I just re-animated an my old FreeBSD server but have some serious issues with updating my ports collection: > > fetch: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-6.bz2: Not Found > *** Error code 1 > > I already tried: > portupgrade make fetchindex > portupgrade make index > > but every time the first error comes up. Can someone tell me how solve this? > 6.4 is EOL but it seems the index is build for portsnap. Even in 8.3-RC2 you can find the following lines in /etc/portsnap.conf INDEX INDEX-6 DESCRIBE.6 INDEX INDEX-7 DESCRIBE.7 INDEX INDEX-8 DESCRIBE.8 At last on my 8.3-RC2 system INDEX-6 will be renewed per default during "portsnap update" So if you use portsnap you have a real chance to get INDEX-6 but ports are not guarantied to build since most of the 6.x specific parts are already removed from the ports tree. If you want to try portsnap rename /usr/ports to ports.old so you have your old tree as fall-back. -- Regards, olli From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 20:25:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AFB81065672 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 20:25:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F388FC19 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 20:25:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.25.8] (unknown [91.93.38.115]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 80A5C3F41B for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 16:25:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 23:24:59 +0300 (EEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Subject: Where are conventions like -devel ports documented? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 20:25:05 -0000 Perhaps I am missing the obvious and will be rewarded with embarrassement, but where are conventions like the use and naming of -devel ports described? I would have expected this to be covered in http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.html but -- it is not. (If this is an omission, can someone more closely involved than I have been so far donate a paragraph or two?) Gerald PS: I am thinking to split the existing emulators/wine port into two, the regular one (tracking releases of Wine) and a -devel port that tracks the bi-weekly snapshots that will lead to the next release in a year or two. Somehow I would prefer something like wine-stable / wine instead of wine / wine-devel, but the latter is more in line with how we are doing things, right? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 25 20:39:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B27B1065672 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 20:39:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@heesakkers.info) Received: from server4.ohos.nl (server4.ohos.nl [IPv6:2a00:d880:0:6::c951:214d]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1D48FC24 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 20:39:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [2001:470:1f15:1555::2] (helo=pcoliver.heesakkers.info) by server4.ohos.nl with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SBuDh-000ODH-SR for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 22:39:23 +0200 From: Oliver Heesakkers To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 22:39:20 +0200 Message-ID: <2292653.CCsfIzVvdP@pcoliver.heesakkers.info> User-Agent: KMail/4.7.3 (FreeBSD/9.0-RELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: Where are conventions like -devel ports documented? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 20:39:25 -0000 Op zo 25 mrt 2012 23:24:59 schreef Gerald Pfeifer: > Perhaps I am missing the obvious and will be rewarded with > embarrassement, but where are conventions like the use and > naming of -devel ports described? > > I would have expected this to be covered in > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.html > but -- it is not. > Try this section: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.html#PORTING-PKGNAME From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 26 02:37:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE7F106566B for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 02:37:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org) Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.49.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40998FC18 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 02:37:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2CF1B5C45; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 22:37:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 22:37:38 -0400 From: Wesley Shields To: Gerald Pfeifer Message-ID: <20120326023738.GA44926@atarininja.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Where are conventions like -devel ports documented? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 02:37:44 -0000 On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 11:24:59PM +0300, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Perhaps I am missing the obvious and will be rewarded with > embarrassement, but where are conventions like the use and > naming of -devel ports described? > > I would have expected this to be covered in > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.html > but -- it is not. > > (If this is an omission, can someone more closely involved than > I have been so far donate a paragraph or two?) > > Gerald > > PS: I am thinking to split the existing emulators/wine port into > two, the regular one (tracking releases of Wine) and a -devel port > that tracks the bi-weekly snapshots that will lead to the next > release in a year or two. Somehow I would prefer something like > wine-stable / wine instead of wine / wine-devel, but the latter is > more in line with how we are doing things, right? Correct, the latter is how things are done. I think of it this way: as a user of wine I want the "wine" port/package to give me the best working version while "wine-devel" to give me a development version, for whatever "development version" means. It is clear to me that I'm getting something not as well tested as the latest release. -- WXS From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 26 06:30:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4911065670; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 06:30:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE97E8FC1C; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 06:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2Q6UUJr027958; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 06:30:30 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2Q6UUXh027942; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 06:30:30 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:30:25 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Konstantin Belousov Message-ID: <20120326063024.GB7318@azathoth.lan> References: <4F6F14AF.9070501@filez.com> <20120325151816.GZ2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120325151816.GZ2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, pgsql@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees , Radim Kolar Subject: Re: Postgresql 8.2 branch - keep it in tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 06:30:30 -0000 --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 06:18:16PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 12:54:36PM +0000, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 25 Mar 2012 13:51, "Radim Kolar" wrote: > > > > > > please do not remove this pgsql branch. its newest branch using old > > postgresql-contrib full text search engine. Upgrading to 8.3+ is not > > possible for such applications. > >=20 > > I'm afraid it's not only end of life by upstream, but also vulnerable in > > more than one CVE, and will not be fixed. > Why is presence of a CVE relevant for 90% of all port users ? How are we supposed to know how people are using the ports? It is impossibl= e to know how much the CVE will impact our users, keeping ports with known unfix= ed CVE is proposing potentially risky software to our users, which is not acceptab= le. If upstream has dropped their support for a given version, a maintainer has= two choices: do himself the active support instead of upstream, or follow upstr= eam policy and drop the port. regards, Bapt --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk9wDQAACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExUFACgnxWGEXSgAf+LB9LVn5avnrob azAAoKLQgnLjDO48IHsh1Rr59V/2VFl/ =8x8b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 26 07:26:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51755106564A; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:26:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hsn@filez.com) Received: from ponto.amerinoc.com (ponto.amerinoc.com [64.6.108.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12DE78FC0A; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:26:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fbsd8.localdomain (205.83.broadband7.iol.cz [88.102.83.205]) (authenticated bits=128) by ponto.amerinoc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2Q7QfqI023908 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:26:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hsn@filez.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.0.0.1]) by fbsd8.localdomain (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2Q7QZO0051952; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:26:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hsn@filez.com) Message-ID: <4F701A27.6010806@filez.com> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:26:31 +0200 From: Radim Kolar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4F6F14AF.9070501@filez.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120325-1, 25.03.2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pgsql@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Postgresql 8.2 branch - keep it in tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:26:45 -0000 > I'm afraid it's not only end of life by upstream, but also vulnerable in more than one CVE, and will not be fixed. CVE Yes, but if you need particular DB version for your app, user will install it anyway. For security related point of view it does not matter if he installs it from ports or not. > Can you give more detail on exactly what you are trying to do? > According to app supplier it does not work in newer pgsql because: 1. Tsearch2 module changed 2. system catalogue changed 3. string escaping is slightly different There are no plans to update application to newer pgsql at this moment. Similar problem will be with postgresql 8.3. It is only known version which works with hyperic hq, hibernate complains on other version - "cant store XXXX class". 2) Booting tomcat 5.5 from tree is the same problem. It will be still in use for years, supported upstream or not. Most java apps today are still for tomcat 5.5 People dont care about CVE, they care about applications. Mark these ports as vulnerable, but keep them in port tree. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 26 11:06:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248FD106566B for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:06:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBF88FC1F for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2QB68qe017502 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:06:08 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2QB68QT017500 for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:06:08 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:06:08 GMT Message-Id: <201203261106.q2QB68QT017500@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: FreeBSD ports list Cc: Subject: Current unassigned ports problem reports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:06:09 -0000 (Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o ports/166410 New port: math/bargraph - Clustered/Stacked Filled Bar o ports/166389 [NEW PORT] multimedia/bino: 3D video player with multi f ports/166388 security/libgcrypt is broken o ports/166370 [patch] ports/unreal does not build on system without o ports/166341 devel/valgrind crash on binaries built with gcc46 o ports/166326 new port: x11/metalock o ports/166320 [maintainer] update security/heimdal to 1.5.2 f ports/166313 please, update net-mgmt/zabbix-server to 1.8.11 o ports/166301 New slave port: editors/lazarus-qt4 FreePascal editor o ports/166300 New slave port: editors/lazarus-gtk2 FreePascal editor o ports/166288 new port: devel/ultragetopt o ports/166275 [new port] sysutils/automount devd(8) based automounte o ports/166244 [maintainer update] databases/powerarchitect version u o ports/166243 New port databases/jdbc-oracle10g: JDBD driver for Ora o ports/166237 New port: devel/arduino-glcd: A Graphical LCD library o ports/166209 [PATCH] cad/verilog-mode.el port update o ports/166206 audio/freeswitch-music update o ports/166204 Update port: print/reportlab2 Fix fonts search path o ports/166167 [patch] mail/mailman Port reinstall Patch f ports/166136 [patch] databases/freetds-devel properly link tds modu o ports/166117 add knobs in math/grace to make features selectable an o ports/166058 New port sysutils/py-XenAPI f ports/166055 [patch] x11/fireflies does not build with x11-toolkits o ports/166006 Problem with mail/postfix and mail/mailman integration f ports/166004 www/squid31 3.1.19 crashes on first request o ports/165933 [new port] lang/php54 o ports/165926 [patch] deskutils/cairo-dock-plugins fix many bugs o ports/165925 [patch] deskutils/cairo-dock fix many bugs f ports/165918 unable to build net-mgmt/zenoss with subversion o ports/165900 [new port] emulators/linux_base-c6 f ports/165899 devel/wand-libconfig and devel/libconfig conflict (sam f ports/165898 deskutils/cairo-dock-plugins 2.3.0~3_2 (The icon effec o ports/165865 New port: devel/pure-stllib: Deprecate pure-stldict & o ports/165842 [maintainer-update] games/ioquake3 and slaves o ports/165799 utmpx fix for japanese/emacs-emcws f ports/165672 sysutils/bacula-server doesn't install all symlinks ne o ports/165586 New port german/lx-office-erp, sql-ledger fork with ex o ports/165361 x11-wm/e17-module-mem counts memory incorrectly s ports/165353 ports-mgmt/portupgrade can't parse date anymore o ports/165337 new port: sysutils/fusefs-mp3fs Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95481065672 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:24:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sfrwly@yahoo.com) Received: from nm28-vm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm28-vm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FB7A8FC0C for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:24:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.138.90.56] by nm28.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Mar 2012 16:24:21 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.175] by tm9.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Mar 2012 16:24:21 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1031.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Mar 2012 16:24:21 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 556344.21995.bm@omp1031.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 10499 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Mar 2012 16:24:21 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1332779061; bh=iBP6TSpJOZ6n7lAWlezZ0dFLslw6Ug8pqoqX9Dq9oLE=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=BYLo+Qrpw+bx+97bz6rtff0BB52TypY2X+aNRCw35TdKdkrAqty923mjTtceNzXr1u1fe9++6PB12Gn+oZC7hzjepzvfUyUWpWZ7LR3qwW571q/ulR0Klhw3p7Amv25jsQLOGn7iZsixlRcjuXnt+1ow9lbAs/hfoVp9NjpUzDs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=OZJyOTi3L1Jw1HMSghs3DlTNypM74iUIp120/bsmPbD2KtYPcJTCXDFcJZhPX4vntd0/XkVkS20MTP1+/O6yFixXasH1XwlJ7Ovs21VIqTXBeWDVCoeDyUBzudBmYnl35Xk5ztns1bxgHdSfkaY0frSJ+ALQ7SPjgL9z/YWUnbg=; X-YMail-OSG: dDCS464VM1kk.ISPM5gtRhKFgwRYxY1q5gYEMFYH7kAUWGB gqxghRisr Received: from [84.72.7.76] by web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:24:20 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.117.340979 Message-ID: <1332779060.10007.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:24:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Steve Frowly To: "ports@freebsd.org" , "henry.hu.sh@gmail.com" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: x11/slim env data gets lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Steve Frowly List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:24:27 -0000 Hi=0A=0AI started using x11/slim a week ago and I must say I love it. One t= hing I noticed is that some environment variables don't get set which I nor= mally have when I login at the console. To analyze the problem I run:=0A=0A= # logging in via syscons=0A=0A$ env | sort > normal-login=0A=0A# logging in= via slim and then invoking an xterm=0A$ env | sort > slim-login=0A=0AA dif= f showed the following difference:=0A=0A-PATH=3D/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/b= in:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/home/stvy/bin:/home/stvy/bin:= /home/stvy/bin=0A+PATH=3D/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/home/stvy/bin=0A=A0= =0A-SHLVL=3D2=0A+SHLVL=3D1=0A=A0=0A-XTERM_LOCALE=3Den_US.UTF-8=A0=A0=A0 =0A= +XTERM_LOCALE=3DC=0A=0A=0A-FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=3DYES=0A=0ADoes anyone have an = idea what's going wrong? I noticed that FTP_PASSIVE_MODE gets set in /etc/l= ogin.conf.=0A=0AIt's as if slim does not load /etc/login.conf=0A=0AThanks y= ou for your help.=0A=0A--=0A=0ASteve=0A From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 26 18:56:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F871065670 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:56:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andy@neu.net) Received: from mail.neu.net (unknown [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:d300:216:3eff:fe54:f1c6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621C28FC0A for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from neu.net (neu.net [199.48.129.194]) by mail.neu.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2QIuUYn098030 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:56:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@neu.net) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:56:30 -0400 (EDT) From: AN To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HS_INDEX_PARAM, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.neu.net Subject: new port request X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:56:37 -0000 I would like to request the following app be added to the ports tree. I am not a developer or I would try to do it myself. Packet Tracer Version 5.3.3 www.mediafire.com/?sx7on7xjuowncl3 It is a Cisco application that is very helpful for learning networking, and studying for Cisco exams. It would be a useful tool to have on FreeBSD. Thanks in advance to anyone who may work on this. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 26 18:57:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22AE91065676 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:57:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EEE8FC18 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:57:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaaf13 with SMTP id f13so1775846eaa.13 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:57:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JL9jyodocJqti+I3l/1p11eFsQ57fyG7ms9//qsWUS0=; b=BkkanyTip+R/sCkWClIS0Zc3KLfqZ6uB0T9lcoSdhWsADyyZIsFb4WYSDyZRdaqyW1 iZnLhDJmh7E24OSWdjDPAAx7mbS4/Azn+Z5PljsLk8xCXXBrSDCN7EU/vr5RBcATBOzk Br7KwrGJ4MHKGiMP47q2t43CDcICiO9wysPau064CUYGYqqZi/LL0401ig4rcFqisLCF D2HAXxQim/7Tg6ItAnn5eeo6MagSxF5wE+FSSnbweEl6cdpIC1693H6SD3E7z4FFXSQf NtOjHWj68i7x08TTAvN0+qmU0N5cVgftbckjmKt/uzXC21AIUfs+ev78sEbEMSKJdzl7 lcFg== Received: by 10.213.25.78 with SMTP id y14mr1653685ebb.40.1332788275656; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:57:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Groseille.malikania.fr (197.21.102.84.rev.sfr.net. [84.102.21.197]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d54sm61301446eei.9.2012.03.26.11.57.52 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F70BC30.5070700@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:57:52 +0200 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120320 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <1332779060.10007.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1332779060.10007.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: x11/slim env data gets lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:57:57 -0000 On 26/03/2012 18:24, Steve Frowly wrote: > Hi > > I started using x11/slim a week ago and I must say I love it. One thing I noticed is that some environment variables don't get set which I normally have when I login at the console. To analyze the problem I run: > > # logging in via syscons > > $ env | sort> normal-login > > # logging in via slim and then invoking an xterm > $ env | sort> slim-login > > A diff showed the following difference: > > -PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/home/stvy/bin:/home/stvy/bin:/home/stvy/bin > +PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/home/stvy/bin > > -SHLVL=2 > +SHLVL=1 > > -XTERM_LOCALE=en_US.UTF-8 > +XTERM_LOCALE=C > > > -FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES > > Does anyone have an idea what's going wrong? I noticed that FTP_PASSIVE_MODE gets set in /etc/login.conf. > > It's as if slim does not load /etc/login.conf > > Thanks you for your help. > > -- > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" The login via the tty is done using a full login, the problem with slim is that it only calls a shell to run a .xinitrc (or .xsession) located in the user home directory thus removing every environment variable. Because I never found a solution, I removed slim :( Cheers, -- David Demelier From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 26 19:06:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C43E106566B for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:06:19 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 X-List-Administrivia: yes Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Errors-To: owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Your message to freebsd-chat awaits moderator approval X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:06:20 -0000 Your mail to 'freebsd-chat' with the subject New job vacancy - see details Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: SpamAssassin identified this message as possible spam Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel this posting, please visit the following URL: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/confirm/freebsd-chat/97dc921e1a285cbe9027d34ca416b50613c0a11b PLEASE NOTE! If you would like to post freely to the list, please subscribe first. If you post from multiple addresses, you can subscribe each address and go into the options page and select 'no mail' for all but one address. This will allow you to post without delay in the future. Sorry for the hassle, but certain immature people made this necessary. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 26 19:06:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FBB106566C for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:06:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:06:30 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 X-List-Administrivia: yes Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Errors-To: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Your message to freebsd-isp awaits moderator approval X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:06:32 -0000 Your mail to 'freebsd-isp' with the subject New job vacancy - see details Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: SpamAssassin identified this message as possible spam Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel this posting, please visit the following URL: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/confirm/freebsd-isp/9dcde4cfdd96d5cba8e7aebb1214429a6baccfdd PLEASE NOTE! If you would like to post freely to the list, please subscribe first. If you post from multiple addresses, you can subscribe each address and go into the options page and select 'no mail' for all but one address. This will allow you to post without delay in the future. Sorry for the hassle, but certain immature people made this necessary. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 26 19:09:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07EA21065670; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:09:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gradedceo@uky.edu) Received: from telesp.net.br (189-68-45-207.dsl.telesp.net.br [189.68.45.207]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D0A8FC15; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:09:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F70BE03.104020@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:09:28 -0300 From: , , , , User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: , , , , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Employment opportunity X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:09:30 -0000 I would like to take this time to welcome you to our hiring process and give you a brief synopsis of the position's benefits and requirements. If you are taking a career break, are on a maternity leave, recently retired or simply looking for some part-time job, this position is for you. Occupation: Flexible schedule 1 to 3 hours per day. We can guarantee a minimum 20 hrs/week occupation Salary: Starting salary is 3000 EUR per month plus commission. Region: Europe Please note that there are no startup fees or deposits to start working for us. To request an application form, schedule your interview and receive more information about this position please reply to Walter@jobdayseu.com,with your personal identification number for this position IDNO: 8060 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 26 19:10:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF86106564A for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:10:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.139.233.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4AD8FC17 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cde1100.uni.vrs [192.168.0.100]) (Authenticated sender: ohauer) by p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C41120818; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:10:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4F70BF13.5050409@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:10:11 +0200 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: AN Subject: Re: new port request X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:10:19 -0000 On 2012-03-26 20:56, AN wrote: > I would like to request the following app be added to the ports tree. I am not a developer or I would try to do it myself. > > Packet Tracer Version 5.3.3 > www.mediafire.com/?sx7on7xjuowncl3 > > It is a Cisco application that is very helpful for learning networking, and studying for Cisco exams. It would be a useful tool to have on FreeBSD. Thanks in advance to anyone who may work on this. No! http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/netacad/course_catalog/PacketTracer.html The Packet Tracer software is available free of charge ONLY to Networking Academy instructors, students, alumni, and administrators that are registered Academy Connection users. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 26 19:13:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A689106564A; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:13:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68A28FC08; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so5881458bkc.13 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:13:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=kyLc8xjWmA02w3Ds6nOx2eANrvw09f4iZIufFxnfR/w=; b=ZrTfDyQCPdV9unAyZcQ8MmlfpHUTTIoxOv9VGoh7KXVsLMfOeRv0lhp0ZotO4ZGwuf zRu+mCrdcFYzG9JKlx8x9ykqKTeErJD53huejziDviYPELysfFWzh6/Lzzzk2wfwcwKy m/j3xzDObVGniE/Us1mvBNnimzo7UuL25PAMfTf9hOk82uOIT8rCaW1EDCBdo4NvUpmH WahbgbnaLnzTlhZNHaO3OSawl/eNmMrRZk/6NOE+csKlP5udnQkbgMNMyUYGUECN4AFr 05lH/ZLKTW4NAV9pObJIuYidpDjYkEweN6OLqBGcbFeLUhic6DH7jYdGlBpnR0tbLVYH TIwg== Received: by 10.204.148.82 with SMTP id o18mr9174179bkv.108.1332789190621; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:13:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:12:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F701A27.6010806@filez.com> References: <4F6F14AF.9070501@filez.com> <4F701A27.6010806@filez.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:12:40 +0000 Message-ID: To: Radim Kolar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, pgsql@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Postgresql 8.2 branch - keep it in tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:13:12 -0000 On 26 March 2012 07:26, Radim Kolar wrote: >> I'm afraid it's not only end of life by upstream, but also vulnerable in >> more than one CVE, and will not be fixed. > CVE Yes, but if you need particular DB version for your app, user will > install it anyway. For security related point of view it does not matter if > he installs it from ports or not. > > >> Can you give more detail on exactly what you are trying to do? >> > According to app supplier it does not work in newer pgsql because: > 1. Tsearch2 module changed > 2. system catalogue changed > 3. string escaping is slightly different > > There are no plans to update application to newer pgsql at this moment. > Similar problem will be with postgresql 8.3. It is only known version which > works with hyperic hq, hibernate complains on other version - "cant store > XXXX class". > > 2) Booting tomcat 5.5 from tree is the same problem. It will be still in use > for years, supported upstream or not. Most java apps today are still for > tomcat 5.5 > > People dont care about CVE, they care about applications. Mark these ports > as vulnerable, but keep them in port tree. Radim, if you ever need the port in future, the following will come in handy: #!/bin/sh cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@anoncvs.fr.FreeBSD.org:/home/ncvs login for dir in server client contrib do cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@anoncvs.fr.FreeBSD.org:/home/ncvs co -D 2012-03-26 ports/databases/postgresql82-${dir} done You can always get the port's files-- they will not disappear forever. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 26 19:23:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB411065694 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:23:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95658FC0A for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:23:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnk4 with SMTP id k4so5042290ggn.13 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:23:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hKAWcBn7DT/7RuR1KinmGg7/iGbx0Og4wDKJjtUuwN4=; b=FvXQLrE65Zy4hJOO9n6XXc9/9oH2dijojj+4KTWChrMCY9OxU5eLRmN3VNndz15HGj 50w497K/mRP6tVRUGjAB76fUhpP1v6TWW8PCcVwuWSrmH1oSgMSafVyx1K2xt9awvn/C fM4I8K33Evgm4Ba8d+1E84CaQKdkrBQu9lpYTyK0I79TgcD6fjwpLtbrBxpD8Z7tOi2w YgZTu77Zujer5/6WITqNMRRsSpxbgiqMrEGdxy4/kow4U0vFd9CIMQXDPCEjB5nd1OuJ PX+KjH4wyI5owzlEeXRUwoyBRm9ZBsBgP5u6h77uNT7wER1KIO3QrTD85C6BJiAmjvE7 /00g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.212.97 with SMTP id nj1mr6595194igc.65.1332789780949; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:23:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.78.81 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:23:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:23:00 -0500 Message-ID: From: Jeremy Messenger To: AN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new port request X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:23:02 -0000 On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:56 PM, AN wrote: > I would like to request the following app be added to the ports tree. =A0= I am > not a developer or I would try to do it myself. > > Packet Tracer Version 5.3.3 > > > It is a Cisco application that is very helpful for learning networking, a= nd > studying for Cisco exams. =A0It would be a useful tool to have on FreeBSD= . > Thanks in advance to anyone who may work on this. http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/netacad/course_catalog/PacketTracer.html "The Packet Tracer software is available free of charge ONLY to Networking Academy instructors, students, alumni, and administrators that are registered Academy Connection users. To Download Packet Tracer: =95Log in to Academy Connection (you must be a registered Networking Academy student, alumni, instructor, or administrator)" --=20 mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 01:16:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5474106566B for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:16:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6A28FC12 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhq7 with SMTP id hq7so4038014wib.13 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:16:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yYuyCQDZs+FA1icY67RQH/GKXhNqAqDZIRW8sduww7I=; b=Tn7hmkIeNcGlhLGdxt6e8RH3gzm02DgFwhBLjvhmzMzEYio9ahDlDO8ncama0eIS58 zr9MqrK3F06Uh+JHbbM9+l+DaikLc4KYGyxkoaEVr25krbw1eSY2AnwqmkgXgqfLYhgD TfIXFdmROCdv9QA+a+TA5kKfoYiNwDeCQNw/c= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=yYuyCQDZs+FA1icY67RQH/GKXhNqAqDZIRW8sduww7I=; b=K/R1yIIukdY/KGx3IxX4bEGMAkpLq86hQ5cCM51ZFXl6w42JJtP8d6Ycp+Vk2SWq5j zpH1yeSNX7cSRbILd5GXEbWs14SToybSg3tv4aDE/M2dQRWMlemKwcwDSVFYdH2i4ARv Vz2nURuLP/qVRiYnA8ShftIk5SLue0gydSFOav8xHQf0DWTUMfTEZ2QRT/Fc/+/Pbmc0 G7w0iV8mf3uisQDmD6oZF/DnJSl7eB+LTpwnKUHHg4RU+PD8TcuB2AZnVcSWHuKkLA2S tSFVxmLPVw+ZC2e2gTfG/ROYEPN4vVWnY/u9Rzd53jBzZzWe0CjlP2JQBRRGxnJkSWQY OBuw== Received: by 10.180.83.72 with SMTP id o8mr23052515wiy.5.1332810964143; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:16:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.63.4 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:15:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F70BF13.5050409@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F70BF13.5050409@FreeBSD.org> From: Eitan Adler Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:15:33 -0400 Message-ID: To: freebsd-ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmVHUg+XRChGN4V7KpRLiKt0GNk/8xF693Ki1Yj8hr1W78Z56k6rqSL8P0A68OCQ4lY4Gus Cc: AN Subject: Re: new port request X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:16:05 -0000 On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Olli Hauer wrote: > On 2012-03-26 20:56, AN wrote: >> I would like to request the following app be added to the ports tree. = =C2=A0I am not a developer or I would try to do it myself. >> >> Packet Tracer Version 5.3.3 >> www.mediafire.com/?sx7on7xjuowncl3 >> >> It is a Cisco application that is very helpful for learning networking, = and studying for Cisco exams. =C2=A0It would be a useful tool to have on Fr= eeBSD. Thanks in advance to anyone who may work on this. > > No! We allow propitiatory, commercial, or otherwise restricted software in the tree. I don't see why the request should be denied on these grounds. --=20 Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 01:47:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9045106566C for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:47:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:47:49 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 X-List-Administrivia: yes Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Errors-To: owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Your message to freebsd-chat awaits moderator approval X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:47:50 -0000 Your mail to 'freebsd-chat' with the subject Position opening in your area Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: SpamAssassin identified this message as possible spam Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel this posting, please visit the following URL: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/confirm/freebsd-chat/5f54e9c3d2134a1e738634ffc9821fd8895c20e6 PLEASE NOTE! If you would like to post freely to the list, please subscribe first. If you post from multiple addresses, you can subscribe each address and go into the options page and select 'no mail' for all but one address. This will allow you to post without delay in the future. Sorry for the hassle, but certain immature people made this necessary. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 01:48:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E5A106564A for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:48:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:48:00 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 X-List-Administrivia: yes Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Errors-To: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Your message to freebsd-isp awaits moderator approval X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:48:02 -0000 Your mail to 'freebsd-isp' with the subject Position opening in your area Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: SpamAssassin identified this message as possible spam Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel this posting, please visit the following URL: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/confirm/freebsd-isp/e45229ec6351e91684666cf40b0d37f95ab2d77e PLEASE NOTE! If you would like to post freely to the list, please subscribe first. If you post from multiple addresses, you can subscribe each address and go into the options page and select 'no mail' for all but one address. This will allow you to post without delay in the future. Sorry for the hassle, but certain immature people made this necessary. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 06:44:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50B6106564A for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 06:44:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0F78FC12 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 06:44:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so6293399bkc.13 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 23:44:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=h0B+rp0+eaxu97KS1SNAn3ldYxcbjSmnL/MGCLoUJEU=; b=kJy2JPd0iP32dctiaAO4LcdRtHN/ZvpNNzfJ1h16C1C51JpMbqmfg5KxvDkDmJyav0 gsUJDB+5/1zPfZTf8BxId5hbV7z0ExzIsxm6RAilzqymbE+dUuA2o/thqVFkTusuvm1g RvpzJBfuPAxWtLNw1OssTyO+LaPT0ruflmyrVFAw2y2wkDyTJekNfWT3sN8NYun8RsSA bDvrWW/OpqkdrRDbmBmq3GUQ3wReLoiOlM55pOSsPpWFtAkIYzCLtXsxZsLATTPw/5/5 4lHdWBDWG+SkyYNnP1wAx9iDKG00rx2KtPkqePgrkCfb12EYbgBIxdOsbMNtmuwCLbCP cPJg== Received: by 10.204.148.82 with SMTP id o18mr9803727bkv.108.1332830156110; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 23:35:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 23:35:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4F70BF13.5050409@FreeBSD.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 06:35:25 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: SxcdmAZYhE-NPzAGlRQbQRbwkuU Message-ID: To: Eitan Adler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: AN , freebsd-ports Subject: Re: new port request X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 06:44:16 -0000 On 27 March 2012 01:15, Eitan Adler wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Olli Hauer wrote: >> On 2012-03-26 20:56, AN wrote: >>> I would like to request the following app be added to the ports tree. = =A0I am not a developer or I would try to do it myself. >>> >>> Packet Tracer Version 5.3.3 >>> www.mediafire.com/?sx7on7xjuowncl3 >>> >>> It is a Cisco application that is very helpful for learning networking,= and studying for Cisco exams. =A0It would be a useful tool to have on Free= BSD. Thanks in advance to anyone who may work on this. >> >> No! > > We allow propitiatory, commercial, or otherwise restricted software in > the tree. I don't see why the request should be denied on these > grounds. I question the usefulness of a manual-fetch port for such a trivial bit of software... Half the time these things get broken and they're never noticed by the package building systems. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 09:11:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A581065677; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:11:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD318FC1B; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1SCSAU-0004EI-Fw>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:54:18 +0200 Received: from telesto.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.198]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1SCSAU-0003zQ-Bl>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:54:18 +0200 Message-ID: <4F718034.8090501@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:54:12 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Current FreeBSD , Ports FreeBSD X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF8A59F99BC60FF9A1B70085A" X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.198 Cc: Subject: PostgreSQL server 9.1.3 rejects connections after update: Error connection to the server: FATAL: frontend-protocol 1234.5887 not supported: server supports 1.0 through 3.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:11:11 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF8A59F99BC60FF9A1B70085A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Since the last PostgreSQL port update, server and client are version 9.1.3 and a newly build of the FreeBSD OS (both 9.0-STABLE and 10.0-CURRENT, amd64), clients like pgadmin3 or webinterfaces like those from refdb reject connection to the PostgreSQL server with the error message: Error connection to the server: FATAL: frontend-protocol 1234.5887 not supported: server supports 1.0 through 3.0 All users, execept a local admin and the psql user, are kept in OpenLDAP. It seems, that the LDAP connection got messed up somehow. I tried to recompile everything required by OpenLDAP, PostgreSQL via portmaster -f, since I realized changes in Heimdal on FreeBSD 10.0-CUR and I deleted the old libs via delete-old-libs/files. Does anyone see this problem, too? Regards, Oliver --------------enigF8A59F99BC60FF9A1B70085A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPcYA6AAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8R9sH+gMAZJCpXcBBlFDlrT3L8xgh rekiQSgiStBR62IJoRivfMAkJ2xr1CDR8m+qL/ZjzhMS+RKWi9S5KT0AG0UDXJzq kFeuVc26xnCN8KmHAFz/7l8jgnW7PKI/71VP83aFzpIX8/yo/HcpC7/BKxn67jjU C/bJgG1uPNnfCoUbsDqR7dakihJXilUYHCLoNuTuTH1TxQruJOD6BsqvUSrRY0G/ s+VNrzob1OYy8dFESQZLfdCGu4opRT3sgvoS+M8Pa/TSHQLUw2D3uaHK/EYoa+je rHqoPuSkRJiD9L1b+jtYJbCfoSBXG4Q2YCehrI2105MMmzb0yeWCukk+cM04muY= =8PoZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF8A59F99BC60FF9A1B70085A-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 11:42:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD0B106564A for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:42:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014EC8FC08 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 854DD5C22 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:55:36 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F71A789.3030502@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:42:01 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: libreoffice-3.4.5.2 failing to build X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:42:03 -0000 I've been hunting down some info on why this is failing, but all I keep running into is the previous versions failings... :( I'm building libreoffice on 9.0-Release amd64, and I'm getting build errors qa testing(?) sd. I followed the instructions, but it still failed. It spits out this: scripting deliver deliver -- version: 275594 module 'scripting' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 28 files unchanged terminate called after throwing an instance of 'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException' /usr/local/bin/bash: line 1: 2019 Abort trap: 6 (core dumped) [ a whole lot of code (I'm copying by hand, so it is a bit overwhelming) - involving clone/impress/sd/unxfbsd.pro, solver, and qa_unit ] dmake: Error code 134, while making 'test' gb_LinkTarget_add_library_objects,CppunitTest/libtest_sc_ucalc.so,sc gb_LinkTarget_add_linktarget_objects,CppunitTest/libtest_sc_ucalc.so,Library/libscfb.so [ build all ] top level modules: sc [ build all ] loaded modules: sc [ build cut ] sc_ucalc Abort trap (core dumped) terminate called after throwing an instance of 'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException' gmake[1]: *** [/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-bootstrap-3.4.5.2/solver/340/unxfbsd.pro/workdir/CppunitTest/sc_ucalc.test] Error 1 dmake: Error code 2, while making 'all' [ build all ] top level modules: sw [ build all ] loaded modules: sw [ build all ] loaded modules: sw [ build log ] sw sw deliver deliver -- version: 275594 Module 'sw' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 1 files unchanged ----------------------------------------------------- [ standard error message with webpage link to debug page ] internal build errors: ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-bootstrap-3.4.5.2/sd/qa/unit ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-bootstrap-3.4.5.2/sc/prj [ instructions to build sd part of the build to isolate the issue ] As I mentioned I followed the directions and still hit the same error filed above (if more of the data is needed I guess I'll have to find a way to post it...). I'm on a deadline for this one, so I have to get this to work. How should I further debug this to fix it? Or failing that (as an extreme last resort), will an older package already built work IF it is built for 8.2? TIA guys From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 11:26:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1231065691 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:26:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ilgvars.bkc@bkc.lv) Received: from mx2.bkc.lv (mail.bkc.lv [195.244.128.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93938FC15 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lambda (unknown [195.244.128.57]) by mx2.bkc.lv (Postfix) with SMTP id D945C3198FD; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:06:15 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <3F6F33072DB543C1A80A6ADD10C8D0D6@bkc.lv> From: "Ilgvars Rukers" To: Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:06:15 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="windows-1257"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:56:50 +0000 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: popd-2.2.2a_5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ilgvars Rukers List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:26:50 -0000 Hello! I simply clicked on 'maintainer' at freebsd.org ports ... Seems I've found a long-living bug in subj and I have a rather strong wish to report it to somebody interested. Well, it means I wish to donate (at last...) something like two bytes to open-source community :) Somebody interested? If yes, the story will follow. MBR, --- Ilgvars From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 12:15:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF63106564A for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianf@freislich.nom.za) Received: from brane.freislich.nom.za (brane.freislich.nom.za [41.154.0.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0218FC16 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.2.220] (helo=clue.co.za) by brane.freislich.nom.za with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1SCUwa-000BXw-MS; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:52:08 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=clue.co.za) by clue.co.za with esmtp (Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1SCUwX-000Hza-Ih; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:52:05 +0200 To: "Ilgvars Rukers" From: Ian FREISLICH In-Reply-To: <3F6F33072DB543C1A80A6ADD10C8D0D6@bkc.lv> References: <3F6F33072DB543C1A80A6ADD10C8D0D6@bkc.lv> X-Attribution: BOFH Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:52:05 +0200 Message-Id: X-Missing-rDNS: 10.0.2.220 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: popd-2.2.2a_5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:15:17 -0000 "Ilgvars Rukers" wrote: > Hello! > I simply clicked on 'maintainer' at freebsd.org ports ... > Seems I've found a long-living bug in subj and I have a rather strong wish > to report it to somebody interested. Well, it means I wish to donate (at > last...) something like two bytes to open-source community :) Somebody > interested? If yes, the story will follow. As the author, I'll bite. Ian -- Ian Freislich From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 14:35:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8B71065670 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:35:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kozlov@ravenloft.kiev.ua) Received: from ravenloft.kiev.ua (ravenloft.kiev.ua [94.244.131.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8708FC1C for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:35:28 +0300 From: Alex Kozlov To: Gerald Pfeifer , ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20120327143528.GA2152@ravenloft.kiev.ua> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: Subject: Re: Where are conventions like -devel ports documented? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:35:30 -0000 On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 11:24:59PM +0300, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Perhaps I am missing the obvious and will be rewarded with > embarrassement, but where are conventions like the use and > naming of -devel ports described? > > I would have expected this to be covered in > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.html > but -- it is not. > > (If this is an omission, can someone more closely involved than > I have been so far donate a paragraph or two?) > > Gerald > > PS: I am thinking to split the existing emulators/wine port into > two, the regular one (tracking releases of Wine) and a -devel port > that tracks the bi-weekly snapshots that will lead to the next > release in a year or two. Somehow I would prefer something like > wine-stable / wine instead of wine / wine-devel, but the latter is > more in line with how we are doing things, right? In general, $port / $port-devel more common, but in case of wine I think wine-stable or even wine14 / wine would be better. I suspect that not mouch people would stick with wine release. -- Adios From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 15:35:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF1C106566C for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@dataix.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154778FC19 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:35:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so35136yhg.13 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:35:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dataix.net; s=rsa; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-disposition; bh=vJqKQkgNMjweaGicvSkLES3axP4pCxGmWN00lrng/FI=; b=JOmNos/z3OCIn5XmssfX9a3XKp64w554p12DJPqUeu94BqYDJnH7o8BoJsulCmNOQI +d34OCTUNY8qMB0/Fxr32rto/rUcs/bvuQtC9RCHJZNKfuDxAEgjbXiWSvktGlqX0ZbG W8Co46vBvBVrj9dvYH9V4miSPlpzGwy6OZrk4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :in-reply-to:x-gm-message-state:content-type:content-disposition; bh=vJqKQkgNMjweaGicvSkLES3axP4pCxGmWN00lrng/FI=; b=AWzqj6PdzVju+uzuhZg2VdjQir8ZMHquTchCU7dENixASxP0bL3CQepSrBql9Xa3tB TOlSFdHrWixxmbNDPWzUxpl4AZoo88DgFV8ERiudVJSlGzUPPVRVfClA1qXORoTNLZaI HrozVKCLzduyZ9nrZJLVsaNhmErB6XI34kfLLCFYjKXKTYyZma1U3tOFzcSKKA1NZ2JO M0qIaClzLu+QS/YDbGfOwtdAb1wy0FDwIXFeLw7+oJAu21YXWTRHjucFv4GUYQrXun4m 2pBxySlMENNXbO1Of8qUZqccCp/RH/5pzbGrpjp4Fn8HV8xQ8jLlFlIMVvMBCZeOBOOK 3Yig== Received: by 10.50.88.165 with SMTP id bh5mr8553635igb.50.1332862555100; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:35:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (adsl-108-73-114-173.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net. [108.73.114.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a10sm8772780igj.10.2012.03.27.08.35.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:35:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2RFZoxZ045457 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:35:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Received: (from jhellenthal@localhost) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2RFZoKa042400; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:35:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:35:50 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal To: AN Message-ID: <20120327153549.GA52582@DataIX.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnZVJvEhk/Hr6xU/iZHvd0/6SbcFGLTjFvDXfqs/wZJSIHpT8QhSjd2S/kIciB83fa3VQy2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new port request X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:35:56 -0000 Translation... On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:56:30PM -0400, AN wrote: I would like this to be a port.... > I would like to request the following app be added to the ports tree. I > am not a developer or I would try to do it myself. > Here is its pirated address... > Packet Tracer Version 5.3.3 > www.mediafire.com/?sx7on7xjuowncl3 > > It is a Cisco application that is very helpful for learning networking, > and studying for Cisco exams. It would be a useful tool to have on FreeBSD. > Thanks in advance to anyone who may work on this. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- ;s =; From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 15:45:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA950106564A for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:45:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.139.233.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822E68FC0A for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:45:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cde1100.uni.vrs [192.168.0.100]) (Authenticated sender: ohauer) by p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24368205DE; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:45:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4F71E0A8.1070706@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:45:44 +0200 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20120327153549.GA52582@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <20120327153549.GA52582@DataIX.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: AN Subject: Re: new port request X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:45:51 -0000 On 2012-03-27 17:35, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > Translation... > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:56:30PM -0400, AN wrote: > > I would like this to be a port.... > >> I would like to request the following app be added to the ports tree. I >> am not a developer or I would try to do it myself. >> > > Here is its pirated address... ... This was my reason for the NO. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 15:48:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFCF9106564A for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:48:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588BF8FC15 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id jc3so48954bkc.13 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:48:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=2dJq5I2j6Pz9RdqgjNu0PTUo2k5xw8o2epyy8LIzZc4=; b=QOIAOL/BBesGkrfVCYYdPkTnJdLlv9Bs8/e8s06Iq8EQ2clhjY/WM5Zezsvp3hA6+L TlHff+inCXIThlXlD8mLwIqzmcv194sHQks5Lj0+1hF2wC9fg7y8j7ZVM4bxNQcpfQ9x Z43uP8KsPcCdWUW4jqu10NgcRvqcvpajIV4jLFCe6vH5/KYKw8EMdHk/ZpJYBr2oTOUc fjcg0K4yExgQrUirA8q/07AOrsX4f+JTZ/7mWBRs6s2qSvz4Q9q2qGLGYMEIQ/8b0cx+ uIuQHd7NCYnnazt/88m9dhQ3+D7nSms28iNgdsPPIri/1MeZwGRkdygZ2SLQL6jyuX66 SK/Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.151.89 with SMTP id b25mr4190555bkw.18.1332863313958; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:48:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120327153549.GA52582@DataIX.net> References: <20120327153549.GA52582@DataIX.net> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:48:33 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Jason Hellenthal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: AN , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new port request X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:48:34 -0000 On 27 Mar 2012 16:36, "Jason Hellenthal" wrote: > > > Translation... > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:56:30PM -0400, AN wrote: > > I would like this to be a port.... > > > I would like to request the following app be added to the ports tree. I > > am not a developer or I would try to do it myself. > > > > Here is its pirated address... > > > Packet Tracer Version 5.3.3 > > www.mediafire.com/?sx7on7xjuowncl3 > > > > It is a Cisco application that is very helpful for learning networking, > > and studying for Cisco exams. It would be a useful tool to have on FreeBSD. > > Thanks in advance to anyone who may work on this. > > Let's please give him a break... I'm sure he's not intent on destroying FreeBSD with his evil plans! Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 15:12:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8976106564A for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:12:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rocky@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B588FC14 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:12:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3FD05C22 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:25:39 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F71D8C4.3020502@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:12:04 +1000 From: R Skinner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:06:36 +0000 Cc: Subject: openjdk6 fails to build - jobs issue? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:12:07 -0000 I'm trying to build openjdk6 but it is failing as well. Can someone confirm if I'm seeing gmake[x] if this is running as parallel jobs? I'm running every invocation I can find to prevent it (MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=true, DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS, env settings), but it insists... Its possible something may have changed with the variables, but can't be sure and I don't believe so; at any rate it fails compiling 'hotspot'. I get output with gmake[6], gmake[5], gmake[4]... sorry I can't be clearer, its on a different machine not on the network. Cheers From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 16:54:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4FAD106564A for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:54:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=426bc5e0b=pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from ip-001.utdallas.edu (ip-001.utdallas.edu [129.110.20.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6248FC15 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:54:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Group: None X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhoHAEfwcU+BbgogU2dsb2JhbABFFqhUj3QBGwYCEBSCbwKBYxoTiAoLmgyXLokJkCxjBIhYjhqSIQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,658,1325484000"; d="scan'208";a="94278690" Received: from zxtm01.utdallas.edu (HELO [129.110.200.11]) ([129.110.10.32]) by ip-001.utdallas.edu with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 27 Mar 2012 11:53:49 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:53:49 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: FreeBSD Ports List Message-ID: <270429E98891B3D790767DDE@localhost> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; size=434 Subject: Master Site problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:54:59 -0000 I'm trying to create a new port for a Perl module: CIF::Client. You can find it here: I can't figure out how to define the Master Site so this thing will download. Hopefully one of you perl cpan gurus can help. -- Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/infosecurity/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 17:05:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24448106564A for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:05:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E4B8FC14 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so134224bkc.13 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:05:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vi0Rrqw6fia4cZDYcqQ8dCQg/2qfORV7Khx2lcvAG7k=; b=JTcQk+WPHXBcuC8cP/LpcXsWRbZthIlCAWlUCftgwpzaCuyLdSJy52QSYNgo4RPtDG mCg8R6lc7HHslNB2onxNtPH9K9lByuNLgGvPNPU/f6ZatdkRk6e777+lRV9eThRZiBS3 NrKRPdMPcyw+wlgkkmoewj3hE6YHW3dO5a4z/Msy1I19HvSRX5HZy0qacRWr8NUv9ujW Nl6t/BjC98mBtwFR6GO4Bgz3upC6lgBQcFRFi5zNvZDmRCqJTOJkdUctOCkYyWVTuWlM U+0kR6hSWUU0F5yzHUwJlbNyhymRFg2DPiWk2Xu/seglk2N6ZbZdvf1CJBX2ci8DNuEM D6Fg== Received: by 10.204.148.82 with SMTP id o18mr10655478bkv.108.1332867902167; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:05:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:04:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <270429E98891B3D790767DDE@localhost> References: <270429E98891B3D790767DDE@localhost> From: Chris Rees Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:04:31 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: vldU5B88Tpe_6Bf9-NTvNvGtvrM Message-ID: To: Paul Schmehl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Ports List Subject: Re: Master Site problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:05:04 -0000 On 27 March 2012 16:53, Paul Schmehl wrote: > I'm trying to create a new port for a Perl module: CIF::Client. =A0You ca= n > find it here: > > > I can't figure out how to define the Master Site so this thing will > download. =A0Hopefully one of you perl cpan gurus can help. MASTER_SITES=3D CPAN MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR=3D CPAN:SAXJAZMAN/cif Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 17:12:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BDD5106566C for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:12:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.139.233.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85C78FC14 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:12:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cde1100.uni.vrs [192.168.0.100]) (Authenticated sender: ohauer) by p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1A50205DE; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:12:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4F71F506.2050708@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:12:38 +0200 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports List References: <270429E98891B3D790767DDE@localhost> In-Reply-To: <270429E98891B3D790767DDE@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Paul Schmehl Subject: Re: Master Site problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:12:44 -0000 On 2012-03-27 18:53, Paul Schmehl wrote: > I'm trying to create a new port for a Perl module: CIF::Client. You can find it here: > > I can't figure out how to define the Master Site so this thing will download. Hopefully one of you perl cpan gurus can help. > Hi Paul, try the following a) PORTNAME= CIF-Client MASTER_SITES= CPAN MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= CPAN:SAXJAZMAN/cif b) PORTNAME= cif-client MASTER_SITES= CPAN MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= CPAN:SAXJAZMAN/cif DISTNAME= CIF-Client-${PORTVERSION} -- Regards, olli From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 17:15:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDE0106566C for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:15:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5FD48FC0A for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so148906bkc.13 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:15:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sOe57RidcO50idPZmuC3a71PqiHIS7u3XwCXt4wQx4c=; b=fxl36CLKMmB2HvI21q3HiYo92B62wJUsnTjDrh/0nH1uwdaKj7oVHc+PtWHzpqcEgo Fm1rZkWz0TOJpGjEYd6PWnonbJ66okf5JOeg/5PRAht6zkidq2lX7uUNKcAn6wdhCaR6 K5lAXNQb7dpggk+/FDPYa3nIZyrTerSzOpHNhe7d6GsRSYkX9P5RIlh+ame7MNcP31SK DOOjz8bUwe/+gTuUPxRbkl/pI/CPLdy7+s9akhfYs2mAtfpo3AYJy8/BgIR4WmLuiHI2 XTUD6SOG2rajaZsbZ0Ik0YicH8krXUwTQwVGKd+4h8zaKpaE4rfljMg+GrTJgGXNIODa Eqsg== Received: by 10.204.151.89 with SMTP id b25mr4316737bkw.18.1332868530555; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:15:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:15:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F71F506.2050708@FreeBSD.org> References: <270429E98891B3D790767DDE@localhost> <4F71F506.2050708@FreeBSD.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:15:00 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ixQmPvtxwmFQ9--jj9NJE5fpXZM Message-ID: To: freebsd-ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Paul Schmehl Subject: Re: Master Site problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:15:32 -0000 On 27 March 2012 17:12, Olli Hauer wrote: > On 2012-03-27 18:53, Paul Schmehl wrote: >> I'm trying to create a new port for a Perl module: CIF::Client. =A0You c= an find it here: >> >> I can't figure out how to define the Master Site so this thing will down= load. =A0Hopefully one of you perl cpan gurus can help. >> > > Hi Paul, > > try the following > > a) > PORTNAME=3D =A0 =A0 =A0 CIF-Client > MASTER_SITES=3D =A0 CPAN > MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR=3D =A0 =A0 CPAN:SAXJAZMAN/cif > > b) > PORTNAME=3D =A0 =A0 =A0 cif-client > MASTER_SITES=3D =A0 CPAN > MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR=3D =A0 =A0 CPAN:SAXJAZMAN/cif > DISTNAME=3D =A0 =A0 =A0 CIF-Client-${PORTVERSION} ^^^^^^^ I thought we tried to keep CaPiTaLiSaTiOn of PORTNAME consistent with upstream, just having the origin lowercase, or am I mistaken? Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 17:23:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A403106566B; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:23:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.139.233.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A528FC14; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cde1100.uni.vrs [192.168.0.100]) (Authenticated sender: ohauer) by p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 897C3205DE; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:23:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4F71F78A.4050506@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:23:22 +0200 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <270429E98891B3D790767DDE@localhost> <4F71F506.2050708@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Master Site problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:23:26 -0000 On 2012-03-27 19:15, Chris Rees wrote: > On 27 March 2012 17:12, Olli Hauer wrote: >> On 2012-03-27 18:53, Paul Schmehl wrote: >>> I'm trying to create a new port for a Perl module: CIF::Client. You can find it here: >>> >>> I can't figure out how to define the Master Site so this thing will download. Hopefully one of you perl cpan gurus can help. >>> >> >> Hi Paul, >> >> try the following >> >> a) >> PORTNAME= CIF-Client >> MASTER_SITES= CPAN >> MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= CPAN:SAXJAZMAN/cif >> >> b) >> PORTNAME= cif-client >> MASTER_SITES= CPAN >> MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= CPAN:SAXJAZMAN/cif >> DISTNAME= CIF-Client-${PORTVERSION} > ^^^^^^^ > > I thought we tried to keep CaPiTaLiSaTiOn of PORTNAME consistent with > upstream, just having the origin lowercase, or am I mistaken? > Sure ... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 19:18:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 628BB1065672; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:18:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=426bc5e0b=pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from ip-002.utdallas.edu (ip-002.utdallas.edu [129.110.20.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2AD8FC19; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:18:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Group: None X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgwIAKEQck+BbgogU2dsb2JhbABFFoUqoyyPfQEbBgIQFIIwAQEEASMVQQULCw4KAgImAgJDFAYTiAUFC6ggiHuJCYEvjkg1YwSIWI4akiE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,658,1325484000"; d="scan'208";a="89589679" Received: from zxtm01.utdallas.edu (HELO [129.110.200.11]) ([129.110.10.32]) by ip-002.utdallas.edu with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 27 Mar 2012 14:10:15 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:10:14 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: Chris Rees Message-ID: <4B6E1B8CBFF5FFBFA26B999D@localhost> In-Reply-To: References: <270429E98891B3D790767DDE@localhost> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline; size=702 Cc: FreeBSD Ports List Subject: Re: Master Site problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:18:30 -0000 --On March 27, 2012 12:04:31 PM -0500 Chris Rees wrote: > On 27 March 2012 16:53, Paul Schmehl wrote: >> I'm trying to create a new port for a Perl module: CIF::Client. = =C2=A0You can >> find it here: >> >> >> I can't figure out how to define the Master Site so this thing will >> download. =C2=A0Hopefully one of you perl cpan gurus can help. > > MASTER_SITES=3D CPAN > MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR=3D CPAN:SAXJAZMAN/cif > Thanks Chris. That did the trick. --=20 Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/infosecurity/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 22:02:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73543106566C for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:02:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34EF8FC27 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds12 with SMTP id ds12so350583wgb.31 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:02:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UunxllxK8jFkAdXYlxrKffTd7l/xWh8bUHgat/zqFA0=; b=KBz9Um4ds76nUKf0eiZP4TSBTtIC9s3unzmrI/lAqXSZzlLEjuvHhODaZQt5bTpyie rTEhspEryMamO6RVdq4nqdHM2WOJf9JjWn5zk2NwJ8+fsqt+7za5QG0537Bva652ly0j jJOlALUGXNxjM/eQREFPc7LSmaYR8Pevm2ThwB2hqP5i+aG2xXSkigT8fdscZyLlP9Zn db7vUXrWTV5b0IDBEJk34kPcGXTEApbpmmYba06FLrFO13fWWcriZTrD8ckppIGJbPqu ngLAWcy98gl2ptOGSY3GXF775dYfD7wXWtFdxa0vbuBdBb7MU7ufBXUwmRyjyFAM9jjn b2Qg== Received: by 10.216.135.219 with SMTP id u69mr15304116wei.89.1332885775508; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:02:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (ip18-43-209-87.adsl2.static.versatel.nl. [87.209.43.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k6sm52739540wie.9.2012.03.27.15.02.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:02:54 -0700 (PDT) Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9_Ladan?= Message-ID: <4F72390D.1040101@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:02:53 +0200 From: Rene Ladan Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120315 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Whytcross References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: boinc-setiathome-enhanced-6.12_2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:02:57 -0000 On 24-03-2012 08:04, David Whytcross wrote: > Hi guys, > am hoping you may be able to assist with an enquiry > my FreeBSD 9.0 machine is fitted with an NVIDIA GEForce 210 card > is it possible to utilize its CUDA GPU operability into > boinc_setiathome_enhanced 6.12_1 Currently not I guess, I guess this would also require CUDA support from the X.org drivers. Regards, Renй -- http://www.rene-ladan.nl:8080/ GPG fingerprint = ADBC ECCD EB5F A6B4 549F 600D 8C9E 647A E564 2BFC (subkeys.pgp.net) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 04:03:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5AA106564A; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 04:03:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C568FC14; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 04:03:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhr17 with SMTP id hr17so5278682wib.1 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:03:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nbRS9QQ4XmXxSWZ/wgNYcHWIc0hbFeePEe2ZpmoDZ3A=; b=f1ZEEQ4PgVswFH2Qw5bGiFemNK5TS1j3VkLZ9upDQyvtnjassqlgvDTZ/FlUIbvybO VyxH3MaO/rovNhr8rD90VRLqCWdsKE/LjsDyoCd0dDKRTph2AhR14Fz7UJcIBnPXYhXU Fq0SrBk2oH1q0sCk1w0WXfyAGcEHj1uCcg+HKY5/ZH0oBma66GlEqfeddBKZu7s7i5bn 08c/3ad6JSLoauR5t+PWdUnqSZi5Gf2+tQp7NsEvzXXDHeGtClRDJwvNFFLUnk2/Vkcj 8llPxaDFbvY3n230gACH53AyheRiynw+dcCfrxTY87RPHvbZ+ltFdJ0BEC5wjPnfkXwR 5iTg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.131.30 with SMTP id l30mr15955031wei.111.1332907412361; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:03:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.54.207 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:03:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <270429E98891B3D790767DDE@localhost> <4F71F506.2050708@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:03:32 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: Chris Rees Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Master Site problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 04:03:34 -0000 On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > On 27 March 2012 17:12, Olli Hauer wrote: >> On 2012-03-27 18:53, Paul Schmehl wrote: >>> I'm trying to create a new port for a Perl module: CIF::Client. =A0You = can find it here: >>> >>> I can't figure out how to define the Master Site so this thing will dow= nload. =A0Hopefully one of you perl cpan gurus can help. >>> >> >> Hi Paul, >> >> try the following >> >> a) >> PORTNAME=3D =A0 =A0 =A0 CIF-Client >> MASTER_SITES=3D =A0 CPAN >> MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR=3D =A0 =A0 CPAN:SAXJAZMAN/cif >> >> b) >> PORTNAME=3D =A0 =A0 =A0 cif-client >> MASTER_SITES=3D =A0 CPAN >> MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR=3D =A0 =A0 CPAN:SAXJAZMAN/cif >> DISTNAME=3D =A0 =A0 =A0 CIF-Client-${PORTVERSION} > =A0^^^^^^^ > > I thought we tried to keep CaPiTaLiSaTiOn of PORTNAME consistent with > upstream, just having the origin lowercase, or am I mistaken? I believe that by our conventions it should be" PORTNAME=3D p5-CIF-Client it's much easier to deal with perl version updates when you can just 'portmanager p5-'. Currently I use about 100 perl ports and only two fail to follow this convention and they are top-level apps that happen to be written in perl (net-snmp and dvd::rip). --=20 R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 11:06:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A855106566C for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:06:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rocky@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C0A8FC0C for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 330665C22 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:20:25 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F72F0C9.6060206@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:06:49 +1000 From: R Skinner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F71D8C4.3020502@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4F71D8C4.3020502@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [SOLVED] But question still needs to be answered - Re: openjdk6 fails to build - jobs issue? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:06:58 -0000 On 03/28/12 01:12, R Skinner wrote: > I'm trying to build openjdk6 but it is failing as well. Can someone > confirm if I'm seeing gmake[x] if this is running as parallel jobs? > I'm running every invocation I can find to prevent it > (MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=true, DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS, env settings), but it > insists... > > Its possible something may have changed with the variables, but can't > be sure and I don't believe so; at any rate it fails compiling > 'hotspot'. I get output with gmake[6], gmake[5], gmake[4]... I did finally get this to build - I don't know why it worked, but I'm not complaining. I ran portsclean -CDD, rebooted, portsnap update, and tried again: must have been a patch somewhere in the build; so thank you stranger :) I do still want a clarification, I'm still getting a handle on makefiles and building large projects: What does the gmake[n] mean? Is it parallel builds? I'm not even sure what to google for... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 11:15:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE62106564A for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:15:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC8A8FC0A for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A0D25C22 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:28:47 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F72F2C0.4040907@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:15:12 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: x11/fireflies build fail - typo X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:15:14 -0000 Not trying to piss everyone off here with all these build failures I'm throwing in :) Can I get a confirmation on this one though? I was installing xscreensaver and this came port up as a failed build due to missing file. Due to a break in convention I had to edit /usr/ports/x11/fireflies/work/firelies-2.07/libgfx/src/gui.cxx: -#include +#include Build was successful once this change was made. If someone else can confirm I'll notify the maintainer. Cheers From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 15:21:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5CF106566C for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:21:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCED38FC14 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610F1D23C15 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:21:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DBB2D23C01 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:21:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from MikeBook-Air.local (10.80.0.4) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:21:45 -0400 Message-ID: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:21:45 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:21:48 -0000 Looking for an FAQ on PORTREVISION bumps on commits, pr's. Basically, I make the decision based on 'hey, if I was running a cronjob to do a portupgrade -Rr every night, would I want this to be upgraded'? I know if something is broken across all builds, it doesn't need a portrevision bump. If portversion is bumped, portrevision needs to be reset to 0 (line deleted from Makefile) pkg-plist changed (except for tweaks for portdocs/portexamples) options change? I would think so, I see 'make config' called sometimes on portrevision bump, so I assume if I change the defaults, or add an option that changes build, I should bump it. What about things like removing a run_depends that isn't nessessary? ie: build_depends= This \ That \ TheOther run_depends+= $build_depends but, in reality, you only need 'that' to run. build_depends= This \ That \ TheOther run_depends = that Would the average OP want to rebuild the package just to eliminate the extra run depends? I am thinking, not. why bother? make deinstall/reinstall via portupgrade or portmanager won't really do anything make package/ pkg_delete/ pkg_add won't do anything. So, is there a definitive list? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 15:39:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EEBA106564A; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:39:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECFBC8FC08; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:39:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so1395928bkc.13 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:39:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9iWgydx7qvyoyHxv5x8YzvK1HULHBgpL2+h1WJdVqb8=; b=ib40utkHDdcSBsOnZ0rmKvJScuixbRHYBhTrLhPGvXqQ39tjrfIQgYKjIoPmpTKwW+ E0QN8zxB0YdGITNgTveql2jHvLZ40hS70sOSQVKJl9UGDB4lIo9T5WoSF5u7vz2niASF NCsn3TqLgEImk/hBfbdQo3y4bQqplv7uARWWsflxDurvHqvYgkf5UleKVlowPzc98WcX XI2flCfrWZvIW9JGI/oaeK9pqH3WP4/0mRK6L2jqTqremtKaar+Jy/A0mmIk0BBg9uDM 3nJ/SMwN6r3IEK0qG3nKCj02zFzm+879BJVi2JgOPdtWF/SLpuUfdfSUsJRETOn2CvJM QcNQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.151.89 with SMTP id b25mr6043020bkw.18.1332949160802; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:39:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:39:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:39:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:39:20 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Michael Scheidell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:39:22 -0000 On 28 Mar 2012 16:22, "Michael Scheidell" wrote: > > Looking for an FAQ on PORTREVISION bumps on commits, pr's. > > Basically, I make the decision based on 'hey, if I was running a cronjob to do a portupgrade -Rr every night, would I want this to be upgraded'? > > I know if something is broken across all builds, it doesn't need a portrevision bump. > If portversion is bumped, portrevision needs to be reset to 0 (line deleted from Makefile) > pkg-plist changed (except for tweaks for portdocs/portexamples) > > options change? I would think so, I see 'make config' called sometimes on portrevision bump, so I assume if I change the defaults, or add an option that changes build, I should bump it. > > What about things like removing a run_depends that isn't nessessary? ie: > > build_depends= This \ That \ TheOther > run_depends+= $build_depends > > but, in reality, you only need 'that' to run. > > build_depends= This \ That \ TheOther > run_depends = that > > Would the average OP want to rebuild the package just to eliminate the extra run depends? I am thinking, not. why bother? > > make deinstall/reinstall via portupgrade or portmanager won't really do anything > make package/ pkg_delete/ pkg_add won't do anything. > > So, is there a definitive list? > You also need to consider that packages are rebuilt on a bump, so if the RUN_DEPEND removal were a real monster, the pkg_add -r users will thank you for that. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 15:54:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381D1106566B for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:54:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2188FC16 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:54:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57325621C3A; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:54:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACFBB621C29; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:54:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from MikeBook-Air.local (10.80.0.4) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:54:25 -0400 Message-ID: <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:54:26 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:54:27 -0000 On 3/28/12 11:39 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > You also need to consider that packages are rebuilt on a bump, so if > the RUN_DEPEND removal were a real monster, the pkg_add -r users will > thank you for that. Im guessing perl would qualify for that :-).. needs perl to build, but not run. python, bison, things like that, right? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 15:57:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DEE106566B; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:57:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@e-e.com) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.pub.dw.redsrci.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318278FC15; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:57:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47446EFA58; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:57:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=e-e.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :user-agent:from:from:subject:subject:date:date:references :in-reply-to:message-id:received:received:received; s=ee; t= 1332950273; x=1334764673; bh=mhjyog1GrNYfUgykQ+X45+fc3rHBPLnyMqt BaCah120=; b=eL80CjQlGxulcTCnocB1sj1HPSh6jW+8tPoMLSYLczbj3j9EspE +z4n05catS+HnnNYEk5qBglJALkVL6ka4iYqbMaoXYuUHgjEHVFoZIsbbtLm+Asx y1lQmzMNBILGUelkk0Yt6PXArp1h/pjcRxnNwdysFUGYHLFa4Im0W+L4= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.dw.redsrci.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kw92pY8sjeru; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92CEC6EFA40; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 76.251.118.198 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhelfman) by mail.experts-exchange.com with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:57:53 -0700 Message-ID: <63ca1b333a310ecc2b1d1f0e1e1542a1.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> In-Reply-To: <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:57:53 -0700 From: "Jason Helfman" To: "Michael Scheidell" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Chris Rees Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:57:54 -0000 > > > On 3/28/12 11:39 AM, Chris Rees wrote: >> You also need to consider that packages are rebuilt on a bump, so if >> the RUN_DEPEND removal were a real monster, the pkg_add -r users will >> thank you for that. > Im guessing perl would qualify for that :-).. needs perl to build, but > not run. > > python, bison, things like that, right? Maybe we can address anything here that needs tuning/adding/removing: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/book.html#MAKEFILE-NAMING-REVEPOCH -jgh From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 16:14:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C20106566B; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:14:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5418FC14; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so929700qcs.13 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:14:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=32Aa6/h4HXRq7Sfkv8LNL4m1CAx1svaRevPDFKbIYgI=; b=EdldWL3J3hEKGbkLstGLUyeuJ75j/ogTcjD6r0RKtC4yYxhG5BPIvyIS+/GJRmgBm7 WOXGeEB633RPJptCG7oKP95UWckUDFsJMXf0uSVbVZrlMQgGlcpFV0ehNZk12qLhpN/K jrEMUXSiO7ULXhe8TGEjd6bqgZz3DxjNlvhRF2SWxb93oE6SApqEGhs3SkT3AqaNZK6r p7ny+6zKLzTS09i8YXzzdaPWel+OYpEJtmWn8UD0Qw/HGP+lCcTW46403gcTgZByMcEw l3y52FsujbhEEAaJA8NBLXXnhL6yG5oahCXwclzuxQi3WzGPprR+WxYqaI4IacJls9ie BHQg== Received: by 10.229.135.140 with SMTP id n12mr11815837qct.12.1332951240088; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:14:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from philip.hq.rws (wsip-174-79-184-239.dc.dc.cox.net. [174.79.184.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g9sm2213312qae.16.2012.03.28.09.13.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:13:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F7338C3.8020003@p6m7g8.com> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:13:55 +0000 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6M7G8 Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111029 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Helfman References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org> <63ca1b333a310ecc2b1d1f0e1e1542a1.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> In-Reply-To: <63ca1b333a310ecc2b1d1f0e1e1542a1.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig96F9D846EC59465DB9BDC0D6" Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Michael Scheidell , Chris Rees Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:14:01 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig96F9D846EC59465DB9BDC0D6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable PORTREVISION is historically bumped when you change the resultant package under the default OPTIONS. Basically if you cause the package to be rebuilt on pointyhat then you need to bump it. On 03/28/12 15:57, Jason Helfman wrote: >> >> >> On 3/28/12 11:39 AM, Chris Rees wrote: >>> You also need to consider that packages are rebuilt on a bump, so if >>> the RUN_DEPEND removal were a real monster, the pkg_add -r users will= >>> thank you for that. >> Im guessing perl would qualify for that :-).. needs perl to build, but= >> not run. >> >> python, bison, things like that, right? >=20 > Maybe we can address anything here that needs tuning/adding/removing: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/book.html#MAKEFILE= -NAMING-REVEPOCH >=20 > -jgh >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " >=20 --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Director Operations, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. --------------enig96F9D846EC59465DB9BDC0D6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFPczjFdbiP+9ubjBwRAnvMAJ4qV51dO3IY2o2wK/rkmEG6MA6HXwCdExJb lZvv7LJcBXp5rOXYcsgHQ/A= =IqxV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig96F9D846EC59465DB9BDC0D6-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 16:19:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458E11065675 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:19:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsdsolarux@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f42.google.com (mail-qa0-f42.google.com [209.85.216.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB3268FC15 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:19:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qafi31 with SMTP id i31so694680qaf.15 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:19:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=TqPC0CVA1MGZnQaT3uctEsaeEV57gODfY/BFRNLAzXM=; b=FQuGi1PQMh0wUs4AQaiZ7p4RC3+66kgSHCmZq9HPvBOrdRposyP9ghp7Dvej7jGYpN TXTlNMh59PtvzLyq5Kd9M9/XgrM1M+7vywFsxx30p1gR+PqhtMbzZGKDhJeEaaPVPVyY WV7DxU0W1KjYXD38j3D3dv0tHcPCw3x+jEgWJL9o3pixmwz6QeAndtGDg9RDyJN4GJPa 168LGywIS2E0oeYjGyrqJZTL4875MDpw7l0PoJGXUq3w5elB/hMO6gPHvAb7zJikdLGL pPmNea3sBZHiPAXcvu2ur+ISDHkNiCACwyKzICVO47JV4mliPan5lzlL3sZKz5EBebC/ UvzQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.181.198 with SMTP id bz6mr38874914qab.74.1332951566804; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:19:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.55.202 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:19:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:19:26 -0400 Message-ID: From: Richard N To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: "gsimplecal" - simple-lightweight gtk Calendar X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:19:28 -0000 First off, I would like to thank the author, as listed below, for helping making the "gsimplecal" desktop-tool available for installation, for FreeBSD. Project home: http://code.google.com/p/gsimplecal/ https://github.com/dmedvinsky/gsimplecal Downloads: https://github.com/dmedvinsky/gsimplecal/downloads Home page and Description: http://dmedvinsky.github.com/gsimplecal/ The above should be self-explanatory, but basically, gsimplecal, is a "very" light-weight calendar (dock)applet for the "tint2" trayer-panel, in the "Openbox" environment. Optionally, of course, it can also be used with other DE's, such as Fluxbox, lxde,..., with a variety of other "panel's" as well. ### The below are the recommended Pre-requisite pkg's for "gsimplecal" ################### atk-2.0.1 atkmm-2.22.5 automake-1.11.1 -(This is Required !) automake-wrapper-20101119 cairo-1.10.2_2,1 cairomm-1.10.0 dbus-glib-0.94 dejavu-2.33 freetype2-2.4.7 gdk-pixbuf-2.23.5_1 gio-fam-backend-2.28.8 glib-2.28.8_2 glib-networking-2.28.7_3 glibmm-2.28.2,1 gtk-2.24.6 gtk-engines2-2.20.2 gtk-theme-switch-2.0.0.r2_4 gtk-update-icon-cache-2.24.6 gtk2-qtcurve-theme-1.8.12 gtkmm-2.24.2 linux-f10-atk-1.24.0 linux-f10-cairo-1.8.0_1 linux-f10-gtk2-2.14.7_3 linux-f10-pango-1.28.3 linux-f10-png-1.2.37_1 linux_base-f10-10_4 openbox-3.5.0 -(This or LXDE, Fluxbox, Gnome, ..., is advisable) pango-1.28.4 pangomm-2.28.2 pixman-0.24.0 png-1.4.8 poppler-glib-0.18.0 py27-cairo-1.8.10 py27-gtk-2.24.0 X11/Xorg, ..., xorg-fonts, ... -(This is definitely Required !) ### The below pkg's (optionally) "Enhance" the use of gsimplecal, with tint2, ..., for example.###### tint2-0.11 xcompmgr-1.1.5 xineramaproto-1.2.1 xrandr-1.3.5 INSTALLATION (alternatives): ######################################################################### https://github.com/dmedvinsky/gsimplecal/downloads -(download the "latest", which is, in this example: gsimplecal-1.5.tar.gz) # tar -zxvf gsimplecal-1.5.tar.gz cd gsimplecal-1.5 ./configure; sudo make; sudo make install -(you can now run it from "/usr/local/bin/gsimplecal" # Or, you can also install it via this method: # git clone git://github.com/dmedvinsky/gsimplecal.git cd gsimplecal git pull ./autoreconf.sh ./configure make ./src/gsimplecal (to run it) # Or sudo make install (to run it from "/usr/local/bin/gsimplecal") ########################################################################## For example, with OpenBox/Fluxbox, + tint2: If I simply add this line: "clock_lclick_command =3D gsimplecal" to my ~/.config/tint2/tint2rc file, I get a simple "toggling" calendar. Right now, there is NO "gsimplecal", in our FreeBSD ports/pkg's systems. Yes, I realize there is a heavier "osmo" alternative, however, it would still be great to also have this "gsimplecal" available in our FreeBSD "ports" as maybe: "/usr/ports/deskutils/gsimplecal" ??? HISTORY, and BUG Fixes to "make" gsimplecal work in FreeBSD9: ###########################################################################= ######################################## Below is some excerpts from how the "Author's" fixed "gsimplecal" to make it installable, and useable in FreeBSD9: (Please read these excerpts, with respect for the Author:) "...First, BSD uses different layout of /proc. On Linux the path for current binary is stored as a symbolic link in /proc/self/exe, on BSD it's /proc/curproc/file. I actually knew it would break into pieces on something different from Linux, as I indicated that in the comment in the source long time ago (https://github.com/dmedvinsky/gsimplecal/blob/master/src/Unique.cpp#L23-24 ). The second bug is that I use semaphores to store current PID for the second instance to kill the first one to implement toggling behaviour (when you first run `gsimplecal` it starts, when you run it again, it exits) without any external dependencies, like libunique. It works for most users, because the PIDs are usually small enough (smaller than 32767 that is), but for some reason, on your system gsimplecal gets PIDs like 38207 or something. Sadly, values that big cannot be assigned to semaphores. So if I can easily fix the first problem =97 in fact, I already did it =97 I can't fix the second one easily. I need to ponder about it and figure some way to do this." Basically, it now works great in FreeBSD: "Well, gsimplecal is BSD licensed, so I guess it plays nice with *BSD systems. :-)" ###########################################################################= ######################################### What would we like ?: ##################################################################### I would like "gsimplecal" to be officially ported over to the FreeBSD "ports" system. Feel free to make any changes you need, to make it install easier in FreeBSD, if you like. Also, if you need any other help or details please let me know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- Thanks. Rick. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 16:34:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CB0106564A for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:34:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dedigame295@hosting-2.verygames.net) Received: from hosting.verygames.net (hosting.verygames.net [213.186.52.163]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23BF8FC08 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hosting-2.verygames.net (hosting-2.priv.verygames.net [10.0.1.192]) by hosting.verygames.net (Postfix) with SMTP id EBFBCF8967D for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:34:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: (nullmailer pid 27982 invoked by uid 12295); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:34:03 -0000 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: PayPal Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:34:03 +0200 Message-Id: <1332952443.955456.27981.nullmailer@hosting-2.verygames.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Your PayPal account has been limited! RX 54872G X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:34:23 -0000 Dear PayPal Costumer, It has come to our attention that your PayPal^® account information needs to be updated as part of our continuing commitment to protect your account and to reduce the instance of fraud on our website. If you could please take 5-10 minutes out of your online experience and update your personal records you will not run into any future problems with the online service. However, failure to update your records will result in account suspension. Please update your records before Mars 23, 2012. Once you have updated your account records, your PayPal^® account activity will not be interrupted and will continue as normal. [1]Click here to update your PayPal account information Copyright © 1999-2012 PayPal. All rights reserved. [2]Information about FDIC pass-through insurance References Visible links 1. http://paypal-shoppingcard.com/acounte/ 2. http://paypal-shoppingcard.com/acounte/ Hidden links: 3. http://www.cnlrq.org/medias/images/redirection.php From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 16:39:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882E7106566C; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:39:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5498FC0A; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:39:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so1478103bkc.13 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:39:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=zWQUyEDIFnVKyJRa2o7ueDD4E+owOO3CalGVd9T0ggY=; b=ovzFQ5OMQrz0GQsUHTV/GmLI3eLH4EUa+JlGyEWFVbsDU//WT2kfyrgqZFC7C9nhjB C4PnGs2P8Zu6Nim/HBvGsBaYFwYF+ZNUOF7T15NUbQigasAJnvcqEZUXM4JW59OQy9+z UtNXxNuiyF/J4wZIxh8eN7DlcD0guqwyBWuHmHfoPKAJu5UJt62o4+PEd8YGfwJYgFAi qbXePXO47nYKRSthi61QF6dsCgon0YbMN2efyVuHwBbc1H3zv6Adulsb/sBHi7mzRmdQ vv25VCaxh0vo/ctl3djm4lX743AU+Bwu2glu3SymwteOTFoOexQV4HQgfTQ9OQMtn3+a sfqw== Received: by 10.204.128.201 with SMTP id l9mr12275243bks.90.1332952747748; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:39:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:38:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1332950121.79747@da3m0n8t3r.com> References: <1332950121.79747@da3m0n8t3r.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:38:37 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: EsIWQlrEYVLRcNTKrg7y4l_Cnzc Message-ID: To: Waitman Gobble Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: kde@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: blank window form with qtcreator package X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:39:09 -0000 Forwarding to more appropriate list, and CCing kde@ On 28 March 2012 15:55, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > Hi, > > I am having an issue with qtcreator (using pkg_add) from http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages/Latest/ > running FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64/SMP > > When I start qtcreator a grey window form appears which is totally blank. Note that the other Qt apps appear to function (ie, qtdesigner). > > On another machine running FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT i386 (32bit) with the corresponding Qt packages installed, qtcreator runs as expected. > > Pointers for troubleshooting appreciated! > > Thanks, > > -- > Waitman Gobble > San Jose California USA From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 16:52:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3BD106564A; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:52:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250C38FC08; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:52:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2SGSgkn050378; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:28:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Message-ID: <4F733C3A.7020004@missouri.edu> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:28:42 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Philip M. Gollucci" References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org> <63ca1b333a310ecc2b1d1f0e1e1542a1.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> <4F7338C3.8020003@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <4F7338C3.8020003@p6m7g8.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Jason Helfman , Chris Rees , Michael Scheidell Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:52:41 -0000 On 03/28/2012 11:13 AM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > PORTREVISION is historically bumped when you change the resultant > package under the default OPTIONS. Basically if you cause the package > to be rebuilt on pointyhat then you need to bump it. I was going to say the same thing. But then I thought: this will cause PORTREVISION to be bumped anytime a RUN_DEPENDS or LIB_DEPENDS is updated (because the package will change in +CONTENTS). But, for example, it seems to me that PORTREVISION should NOT be bumped if a LIB_DEPENDS changes, and it is not a major library revision change. For example, in this case the portmaster program reinstalls the library only, and changes the +CONTENTS and +REQUIRED_BY of the various installed packages appropriately. And the program will still work just fine. So PORTREVISION should not be bumped. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 16:52:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE4C106564A for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:52:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsdsolarux@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021D68FC0A for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so962768qcs.13 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:52:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=eAsMDpoVCEucMXmjvdQ+Fu+onQkVUsuYUqSRyXTRjt0=; b=W+w+vHCfAw95xvrWINZY7eV2wNDskgmt/k54TQ/I/vpKywTnDSu03fg9jfy2RjcGWk +XKCcbv0+LkkkthetkswH95hYvshLgdb/5uxwHfiwLAhWg9uvdPiAoiLwDqjY1uUlk0L kLMsl2HIaHNAHLqUBkIU4yyoOG8MgyKKft7mQGluOcpv9oAx9xu65MgXRrJjPXC6rDUD pDZ8Zl/nl0cfJPEnVP/zpLEq1TkKgmKkW+jW4o8DjKyiDrV8IDeyabRlqaojiMFFWEwm eYRjVhIFk+ZPFOefKCfzDwcm+rY5QO4evb9duFh+AK6Cx4P8irgKNKYddXyXc+FlINAB p6QA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.17.202 with SMTP id t10mr38707296qaa.87.1332953562791; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:52:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.55.202 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:52:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:52:42 -0400 Message-ID: From: Richard N To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: "gsimplecal" - simple-lightweight gtk Calendar X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:52:44 -0000 testing? ; is this mailing list that I "subscribed" to even accepting my email ??? On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Richard N wrote: > First off, I would like to thank the author, as listed below, for helpin= g > making the "gsimplecal" desktop-tool available for installation, for > FreeBSD. > > Project home: > http://code.google.com/p/gsimplecal/ > https://github.com/dmedvinsky/gsimplecal > > Downloads: > https://github.com/dmedvinsky/gsimplecal/downloads > > Home page and Description: > http://dmedvinsky.github.com/gsimplecal/ > > The above should be self-explanatory, but basically, gsimplecal, is a > "very" light-weight calendar (dock)applet for the "tint2" trayer-panel, i= n > the "Openbox" environment. > Optionally, of course, it can also be used with other DE's, such as > Fluxbox, lxde,..., with a variety of other "panel's" as well. > > ### The below are the recommended Pre-requisite pkg's for "gsimplecal" > ################### > atk-2.0.1 > atkmm-2.22.5 > automake-1.11.1 -(This is Required !) > automake-wrapper-20101119 > cairo-1.10.2_2,1 > cairomm-1.10.0 > dbus-glib-0.94 > dejavu-2.33 > freetype2-2.4.7 > gdk-pixbuf-2.23.5_1 > gio-fam-backend-2.28.8 > glib-2.28.8_2 > glib-networking-2.28.7_3 > glibmm-2.28.2,1 > gtk-2.24.6 > gtk-engines2-2.20.2 > gtk-theme-switch-2.0.0.r2_4 > gtk-update-icon-cache-2.24.6 > gtk2-qtcurve-theme-1.8.12 > gtkmm-2.24.2 > linux-f10-atk-1.24.0 > linux-f10-cairo-1.8.0_1 > linux-f10-gtk2-2.14.7_3 > linux-f10-pango-1.28.3 > linux-f10-png-1.2.37_1 > linux_base-f10-10_4 > openbox-3.5.0 -(This or LXDE, Fluxbox, Gnome, ..., is advisable) > pango-1.28.4 > pangomm-2.28.2 > pixman-0.24.0 > png-1.4.8 > poppler-glib-0.18.0 > py27-cairo-1.8.10 > py27-gtk-2.24.0 > X11/Xorg, ..., xorg-fonts, ... -(This is definitely Required !) > ### The below pkg's (optionally) "Enhance" the use of gsimplecal, with > tint2, ..., for example.###### > tint2-0.11 > xcompmgr-1.1.5 > xineramaproto-1.2.1 > xrandr-1.3.5 > > INSTALLATION (alternatives): > ######################################################################### > https://github.com/dmedvinsky/gsimplecal/downloads > -(download the "latest", which is, in this example: gsimplecal-1.5.tar.gz= ) > # > tar -zxvf gsimplecal-1.5.tar.gz > cd gsimplecal-1.5 > ./configure; sudo make; sudo make install > -(you can now run it from "/usr/local/bin/gsimplecal" > # > Or, you can also install it via this method: > # > git clone git://github.com/dmedvinsky/gsimplecal.git > cd gsimplecal > git pull > ./autoreconf.sh > ./configure > make > ./src/gsimplecal (to run it) > # Or > sudo make install (to run it from "/usr/local/bin/gsimplecal") > #########################################################################= # > > For example, with OpenBox/Fluxbox, + tint2: > If I simply add this line: "clock_lclick_command =3D gsimplecal" to my > ~/.config/tint2/tint2rc file, I get a simple "toggling" calendar. > > Right now, there is NO "gsimplecal", in our FreeBSD ports/pkg's systems. > Yes, I realize there is a heavier "osmo" alternative, however, > it would still be great to also have this "gsimplecal" available in our > FreeBSD "ports" > as maybe: > "/usr/ports/deskutils/gsimplecal" ??? > > HISTORY, and BUG Fixes to "make" gsimplecal work in FreeBSD9: > > #########################################################################= ########################################## > Below is some excerpts from how the "Author's" fixed "gsimplecal" to mak= e > it installable, and useable in FreeBSD9: > (Please read these excerpts, with respect for the Author:) > > "...First, BSD uses different layout of /proc. On Linux the path for > current binary is stored as a symbolic link in /proc/self/exe, on BSD > it's /proc/curproc/file. I actually knew it would break into pieces on > something different from Linux, as I indicated that in the comment in > the source long time ago > ( > https://github.com/dmedvinsky/gsimplecal/blob/master/src/Unique.cpp#L23-2= 4 > ). > > The second bug is that I use semaphores to store current PID for the > second instance to kill the first one to implement toggling behaviour > (when you first run `gsimplecal` it starts, when you run it again, it > exits) without any external dependencies, like libunique. It works for > most users, because the PIDs are usually small enough (smaller than > 32767 that is), but for some reason, on your system gsimplecal gets > PIDs like 38207 or something. Sadly, values that big cannot be > assigned to semaphores. So if I can easily fix the first problem =97 in > fact, I already did it =97 I can't fix the second one easily. I need to > ponder about it and figure some way to do this." > > Basically, it now works great in FreeBSD: > "Well, gsimplecal is BSD licensed, so I guess it plays nice with *BSD > systems. :-)" > > #########################################################################= ########################################### > > What would we like ?: > ##################################################################### > I would like "gsimplecal" to be officially ported over to the FreeBSD > "ports" system. > Feel free to make any changes you need, to make it install easier in > FreeBSD, if you like. > Also, if you need any other help or details please let me know. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------- > > Thanks. > > Rick. > > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 17:06:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D002F106564A; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:06:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686F78FC14; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:06:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so974068qcs.13 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:06:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=WgmM+bwK/PTy+W7szc4pxWfdV9QLGIoGbMWHUavEj3k=; b=OGAv38tXm9+0KUbZRSBmAC+oZFblGYTHHCRAuI+Nz/0R1nTcYvGuJQHYpc64WEq8jX Xvcf6FsFJJ035qDl5hHQVnZOXAT2ocKSaUiPidzSm4j60Q3eIIdnhyoXnAvoESb+Kmdw A8ADQxCT1OPteyb4lAV0WiIC3jqzqAdM/wdl+ZT4WlViBNbyJQpy+2Q/4IffSagas6/C gYxsW947CuvdTmPCwJzfpEeo8w5q5fAQegw21cC52jetyhUeEKWrLVHuJB8XqhofLkB2 uQS7K+0SgV+MIUpys/YgCvti1MyMICk0TE9z9Lt7FZUXoHeOvvv+lV2b1sETY2YUIJcT w0xw== Received: by 10.224.183.132 with SMTP id cg4mr10616368qab.81.1332954408925; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:06:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from philip.hq.rws (wsip-174-79-184-239.dc.dc.cox.net. [174.79.184.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cv8sm7466851qab.12.2012.03.28.10.06.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:06:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F734524.2000400@p6m7g8.com> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:06:44 +0000 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6M7G8 Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111029 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org> <63ca1b333a310ecc2b1d1f0e1e1542a1.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> <4F7338C3.8020003@p6m7g8.com> <4F733C3A.7020004@missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <4F733C3A.7020004@missouri.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFB298D8911933627FCC9162C" Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Jason Helfman , Chris Rees , "Philip M. Gollucci" , Michael Scheidell Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:06:50 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFB298D8911933627FCC9162C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/28/12 16:28, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > But, for example, it seems to me that PORTREVISION should NOT be bumped= > if a LIB_DEPENDS changes, and it is not a major library revision change= =2E > For example, in this case the portmaster program reinstalls the librar= y > only, and changes the +CONTENTS and +REQUIRED_BY of the various > installed packages appropriately. And the program will still work just= > fine. So PORTREVISION should not be bumped. I'm fairly sure thats exactly backwards. I believe you're talking about our 'Chase sh lib version bump' commits which most definitely require a bump even if the major version doesn't change, b/c the old packages will reference the old library. Take devel/apr-1 for example. --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Director Operations, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. --------------enigFB298D8911933627FCC9162C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFPc0UmdbiP+9ubjBwRAu8gAJ9EJJU70Zk0/wFjfseFeasmlMu46wCfZhAi o2VZGrTDemAkDFbnIpqXUA4= =YZqp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFB298D8911933627FCC9162C-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 18:06:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3794106566C for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:06:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5388FC14 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8749BD23C15; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:06:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0824AD23C03; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:06:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from MikeBook-Air.local (10.80.0.4) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:06:56 -0400 Message-ID: <4F735340.1020103@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:06:56 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Philip M. Gollucci" References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org> <63ca1b333a310ecc2b1d1f0e1e1542a1.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> <4F7338C3.8020003@p6m7g8.com> <4F733C3A.7020004@missouri.edu> <4F734524.2000400@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <4F734524.2000400@p6m7g8.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Stephen Montgomery-Smith , ports@freebsd.org, Chris Rees , Jason Helfman Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:06:59 -0000 On 3/28/12 1:06 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > On 03/28/12 16:28, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >> But, for example, it seems to me that PORTREVISION should NOT be bumped >> if a LIB_DEPENDS changes, and it is not a major library revision change. >> For example, in this case the portmaster program reinstalls the library >> only, and changes the +CONTENTS and +REQUIRED_BY of the various >> installed packages appropriately. And the program will still work just >> fine. So PORTREVISION should not be bumped. > I'm fairly sure thats exactly backwards. I believe you're talking about > our 'Chase sh lib version bump' commits which most definitely require a > bump even if the major version doesn't change, b/c the old packages will > reference the old library. > > Take devel/apr-1 for example. So, basically, you do enough pr's, you will bump portrevision and someone will complain, and you will skip bumping portrevision and someone will complain :-) 10 programmers, 15 opinions. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 18:55:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60B4106564A; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:55:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34EB88FC0C; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so1665236bkc.13 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:55:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/SdQukkYOxcPJ/Rslixvf4Qid+i0cbQMbdvEgaRSzVo=; b=GbghiP1zInBCe7SJkSaQerx3NXoeTl6eTfLMqPLjn1CegKmRsAi4L8vIBvW6vhNamM 8DiXYVOCb/GPMHi1uEQ2+RmcVP8Vgs8RjAMtVR39/Ye2L4p7lx5of95f09vS4YZxXuXm zkU44sCJnk0Sp/FiRz58vPnxCA4qQyks/o/4uJprN8L7/lQzerB3VYdDI1YLZ9p7tVti q2jgc+qt4OBu/7r8flWlSv76eCgXaAil813XuFLgYrgtukk8Covqf2q4BbzPD1kLNSUx 2yemwVfXW22ubNnhZpSPJAZBemAqGxG4ACAPISAEb52499AamSi8GvyIyQ+axD86dGSg FPdQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.141.25 with SMTP id k25mr12344287bku.72.1332960932919; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:55:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:55:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:55:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F735340.1020103@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org> <63ca1b333a310ecc2b1d1f0e1e1542a1.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> <4F7338C3.8020003@p6m7g8.com> <4F733C3A.7020004@missouri.edu> <4F734524.2000400@p6m7g8.com> <4F735340.1020103@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:55:32 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Michael Scheidell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Stephen Montgomery-Smith , Jason Helfman , ports@freebsd.org, "Philip M. Gollucci" Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:55:36 -0000 On 28 Mar 2012 19:06, "Michael Scheidell" wrote: > > > > On 3/28/12 1:06 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >> >> On 03/28/12 16:28, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >>> >>> But, for example, it seems to me that PORTREVISION should NOT be bumped >>> if a LIB_DEPENDS changes, and it is not a major library revision change. >>> For example, in this case the portmaster program reinstalls the library >>> only, and changes the +CONTENTS and +REQUIRED_BY of the various >>> installed packages appropriately. And the program will still work just >>> fine. So PORTREVISION should not be bumped. >> >> I'm fairly sure thats exactly backwards. I believe you're talking about >> our 'Chase sh lib version bump' commits which most definitely require a >> bump even if the major version doesn't change, b/c the old packages will >> reference the old library. >> >> Take devel/apr-1 for example. > > So, basically, you do enough pr's, you will bump portrevision and someone will complain, and you will skip bumping portrevision and someone will complain :-) > > 10 programmers, 15 opinions. > > ... which is why an FAQ page is good to point at if people moan! I look forward to the comments on your proposed list ;) Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 20:20:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B4A1106564A; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:20:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: from z.umatar.com (z.umatar.com [66.135.39.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23858FC0C; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:20:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from z.umatar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2SKKZaP043377; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:20:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: (from uzimac@localhost) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q2SKKZu8043376; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:20:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) X-Authentication-Warning: z.umatar.com: uzimac set sender to uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com using -f From: "Waitman Gobble" To: Chris Rees Message-Id: <1332966035.43371@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Originating-IP: 70.90.171.37 X-Mailer: Usermin 1.500 In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:20:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1332966035" Cc: kde@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: blank window form with qtcreator package X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:20:36 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1332966035 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chris Rees wrote .. > Forwarding to more appropriate list, and CCing kde@ > > On 28 March 2012 15:55, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I am having an issue with qtcreator (using pkg_add) from http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages/Latest/ > > running FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64/SMP > > > > When I start qtcreator a grey window form appears which is totally blank. Note > that the other Qt apps appear to function (ie, qtdesigner). > > > > On another machine running FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT i386 (32bit) with the corresponding > Qt packages installed, qtcreator runs as expected. > > > > Pointers for troubleshooting appreciated! > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- > > Waitman Gobble > > San Jose California USA other details: using Xfce4. new system build within past few days so packages/system should be "close-to" latest. Thank you, -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA --bound1332966035-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 20:52:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B3D1065672; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:52:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D468FC16; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:52:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so1307856yhg.13 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:52:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=P4bpFVqHVw7DjIkj9ZGQwePUX48SVTIVjnxNaHybfj8=; b=XlRqYiCyTt9qLY4Z2z6xo/Oj9sgn2JAQfLDA9RkNUw6KO5+rWuZz0r7sV+MeGjnYNI db7z/yv9J+kg9klzI2wmOreoJJiCJT89wmw804LMkIoDco6tMKIFyKEyXzHYVCfsbDAm Zt8jz77d2iBW3w8Q1HxCDMaYPFrUuyLcFzexaSqgwc9ncYXwtqaT4iypHfUD0CuKK9u5 IFcHReIFog28OI2n0JLm8sZZ1VVHZgGbOBtHPQWvx8KqgRfPhJNcc7t7s0sTI39Jg0Y1 btwp77a+weJQhcPq4fIwMsDjFIihKe7bFtYEy/i3F6TV+EAa0OBFQMquDN8qNbtBuqfh fGiA== Received: by 10.236.193.41 with SMTP id j29mr7898702yhn.14.1332967938150; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from philip.hq.rws (wsip-174-79-184-239.dc.dc.cox.net. [174.79.184.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v26sm10778268yhk.1.2012.03.28.13.52.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:52:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F7379FD.9040802@p6m7g8.com> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:52:13 +0000 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6M7G8 Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111029 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Scheidell References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org> <63ca1b333a310ecc2b1d1f0e1e1542a1.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> <4F7338C3.8020003@p6m7g8.com> <4F733C3A.7020004@missouri.edu> <4F734524.2000400@p6m7g8.com> <4F735340.1020103@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F735340.1020103@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD3EB7BD6D009FEDFB27A8F0B" Cc: Stephen Montgomery-Smith , ports@freebsd.org, Chris Rees , "Philip M. Gollucci" , Jason Helfman Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:52:19 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD3EB7BD6D009FEDFB27A8F0B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/28/12 18:06, Michael Scheidell wrote: > So, basically, you do enough pr's, you will bump portrevision and > someone will complain, and you will skip bumping portrevision and > someone will complain Absolutely, b/c we maintain PORTREVISION for pointyhat not the end users which you blow anyway with your 1st custom option; however, afaik, what I said is what potmgr says typically, but I won't speak for them official= ly. --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Director Operations, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. --------------enigD3EB7BD6D009FEDFB27A8F0B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFPc3n/dbiP+9ubjBwRAuNAAJ92QTya1o8AmW3sICS4fP9V8f9A+gCfWQxY 6PX7z0NPyNcDxnQfFIdSsb4= =QgGg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD3EB7BD6D009FEDFB27A8F0B-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 23:52:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32B31065670; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:52:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dwhytcross@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989398FC08; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:52:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbcwz17 with SMTP id wz17so2883327pbc.13 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:52:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:reply-to:from:to:cc:references:subject:date:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority :x-mailer:x-mimeole; bh=UiqBoUUB0xQYgFA0B2Kjg8Vi9JEccBRIsrmMU+JZVIQ=; b=wzNK4Ak3O7Bc44KkVw0D0NdHIpAtspAOmm5Ee3e0N+DzgijAeoaGJowr4N/57RtQBu Z2vL19vApcaU5+xUlxiFvlcvj1IVKHDN0m9RAvmORTCaxPlPvCAP2zmyK+SFlybPhRSt hsMk58/oZkktvDrvrbCFvdimVTQEcrUKWjl/Sc14em3GBJmak08xhHQjSRSOW2Qv9Qhr QWOkjEFgi7ix+c8xhQ+mkITgrjMB88EJfWbg7wifvv/7GJno9/qdraUlh/l2UvrxG/M3 Zf9jHlhMJFO65hDwtAM8LOzxr3kFtKa9NcRlYIutRMEJ9+n7Bo+GgRW+4JkbobiGkAcW 2liA== Received: by 10.68.203.38 with SMTP id kn6mr619208pbc.54.1332978774002; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:52:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from astrolap (CPE-120-146-199-17.static.vic.bigpond.net.au. [120.146.199.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b1sm3658347pbm.68.2012.03.28.16.52.51 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:52:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <307C751D3D134663BCAB6B32C8A8AAD9@astrolap> From: "David Whytcross" To: "Rene Ladan" References: <4F72390D.1040101@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:52:49 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:16:19 +0000 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: boinc-setiathome-enhanced-6.12_2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: David Whytcross List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:52:54 -0000 thanks for your reply Rene, I wish I knew how to help with this I guess CUDA support is being worked on by someone somewhere in the FreeBSD world, as I see many similar requests to mine on the search engines hopefully more FreeBSD users can get excited by SETI and help spur things along regards, David Whytcross ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rene Ladan" To: "David Whytcross" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 9:02 AM Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: boinc-setiathome-enhanced-6.12_2 > On 24-03-2012 08:04, David Whytcross wrote: >> Hi guys, >> am hoping you may be able to assist with an enquiry >> my FreeBSD 9.0 machine is fitted with an NVIDIA GEForce 210 card >> is it possible to utilize its CUDA GPU operability into >> boinc_setiathome_enhanced 6.12_1 > Currently not I guess, I guess this would also require CUDA support from > the X.org drivers. > > Regards, > Renй > -- > http://www.rene-ladan.nl:8080/ > > GPG fingerprint = ADBC ECCD EB5F A6B4 549F 600D 8C9E 647A E564 2BFC > (subkeys.pgp.net) > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 00:06:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0655F1065670; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:06:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dwhytcross@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6588FC12; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so1401336yhg.13 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:06:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:reply-to:from:to:cc:references:subject:date:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority :x-mailer:x-mimeole; bh=fAB6vPMAHOrNGA72E7JtA9RYeIWHWoYt48O4TCTUUpI=; b=KVg3rbW5xSla5gIdnzSTBfUNuGi4XE/wvdGPVkIfukXzGYOg3wH04tEku9eoC/dvqJ zslwlm9nyAMBric2Dig0BHmmME/i33uJ1RJbrBLSwR6i2e0z751UgfYHFaoo2P5WLekJ Bptk7ZD5Mc1WgYaxz08xThBecxgzJwiiW2YtEDPY93aLCpuRujBBaAf00AScaQjeiDIu bdl/2BWxrT7UpAVJEPzpBKHLpyTh2gQ58/9BIQrLpRguRq2Ct4ZWx2qtnDcQMj0y1t6S Q/9BEwpeX0m+KOpIaOW2uASyNjSox+NCcUDLxM2tBGeeS9TbXyQqXo/RZRLub5kzdkcc WUXA== Received: by 10.68.226.225 with SMTP id rv1mr698857pbc.149.1332979570405; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:06:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from astrolap (CPE-120-146-199-17.static.vic.bigpond.net.au. [120.146.199.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z7sm3681087pbk.63.2012.03.28.17.06.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <15A605BE5B474FBC891D2E526C71528E@astrolap> From: "David Whytcross" To: References: <502308ECD5BE42E982E6660844445CC6@astrolap> <1332576755.28174.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:06:07 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-2"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:16:34 +0000 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: boinc-einsteinathome-4.18_4,2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: David Whytcross List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:06:12 -0000 thanks for your reply Pav, I wish I knew how to help with this I guess CUDA support is being worked on by someone somewhere in the FreeBSD world, as I see many similar requests to mine on the search engines hopefully more FreeBSD users can get excited by BOINC projects and help spur things along PS. you have some great images on your oook.cz website regards, David Whytcross ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pav Lucistnik" To: "David Whytcross" Cc: Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 7:12 PM Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: boinc-einsteinathome-4.18_4,2 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 03:37:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA411065673; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 03:37:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: from z.umatar.com (z.umatar.com [66.135.39.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31A98FC15; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 03:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from z.umatar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2T3bkuj093987; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:37:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: (from uzimac@localhost) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q2T3bkUq093986; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:37:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) X-Authentication-Warning: z.umatar.com: uzimac set sender to uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com using -f From: "Waitman Gobble" To: "Waitman Gobble" Message-Id: <1332992265.93641@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Originating-IP: 75.36.145.148 X-Mailer: Usermin 1.500 In-Reply-To: <1332966035.43371@da3m0n8t3r.com> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:37:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1332992266" Cc: kde@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: blank window form with qtcreator package X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 03:37:48 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1332992266 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Waitman Gobble wrote .. > Chris Rees wrote .. > > Forwarding to more appropriate list, and CCing kde@ > > > > On 28 March 2012 15:55, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am having an issue with qtcreator (using pkg_add) from http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages/Latest/ > > > running FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64/SMP > > > > > > When I start qtcreator a grey window form appears which is totally blank. Note > > that the other Qt apps appear to function (ie, qtdesigner). > > > > > > On another machine running FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT i386 (32bit) with the corresponding > > Qt packages installed, qtcreator runs as expected. > > > > > > Pointers for troubleshooting appreciated! > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -- > > > Waitman Gobble > > > San Jose California USA > > other details: using Xfce4. new system build within past few days so packages/system > should be "close-to" latest. > > Thank you, > > -- > Waitman Gobble > San Jose California USA Figured out the problem, I was looking at reinstalling Qt and noticed pkg_updating.. mentions issue 2012-03-13 about MIT-SHM. I didn't catch this error before using the launcher icon, but when starting qtcreator from terminal I notice the error about MIT-SHM.. searched a bit and found this page: http://forums.freebsd.org/archive/index.php/t-29770.html seems that # sysctl kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed=1 fixes the problem... qtcreator then starts properly with stuff on the form (ie, not blank). so... I suppose the explanation seems to be that qt4-gui-4.7.4_1 is not yet available in the /Latest amd64 packages... (?) checking this out now. Thank you, -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA --bound1332992266-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 03:53:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51721106566B; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 03:53:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: from z.umatar.com (z.umatar.com [66.135.39.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1416D8FC0C; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 03:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from z.umatar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2T3rw2Y055913; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:53:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: (from uzimac@localhost) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q2T3rwIH055912; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:53:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) X-Authentication-Warning: z.umatar.com: uzimac set sender to uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com using -f From: "Waitman Gobble" To: "Waitman Gobble" Message-Id: <1332993238.55656@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Originating-IP: 75.36.145.148 X-Mailer: Usermin 1.500 In-Reply-To: <1332992265.93641@da3m0n8t3r.com> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:53:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1332993238" Cc: kde@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: blank window form with qtcreator package X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 03:53:59 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1332993238 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Waitman Gobble wrote .. > Waitman Gobble wrote .. > > Chris Rees wrote .. > > > Forwarding to more appropriate list, and CCing kde@ > > > > > > On 28 March 2012 15:55, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I am having an issue with qtcreator (using pkg_add) from http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages/Latest/ > > > > running FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64/SMP > > > > > > > > When I start qtcreator a grey window form appears which is totally blank. > Note > > > that the other Qt apps appear to function (ie, qtdesigner). > > > > > > > > On another machine running FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT i386 (32bit) with the corresponding > > > Qt packages installed, qtcreator runs as expected. > > > > > > > > Pointers for troubleshooting appreciated! > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Waitman Gobble > > > > San Jose California USA > > > > other details: using Xfce4. new system build within past few days so packages/system > > should be "close-to" latest. > > > > Thank you, > > > > -- > > Waitman Gobble > > San Jose California USA > > Figured out the problem, I was looking at reinstalling Qt and noticed pkg_updating.. > mentions issue 2012-03-13 about MIT-SHM. I didn't catch this error before using > the launcher icon, but when starting qtcreator from terminal I notice the error > about MIT-SHM.. searched a bit and found this page: > > http://forums.freebsd.org/archive/index.php/t-29770.html > > seems that > # sysctl kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed=1 > > fixes the problem... qtcreator then starts properly with stuff on the form (ie, > not blank). > > so... I suppose the explanation seems to be that > qt4-gui-4.7.4_1 is not yet available in the /Latest amd64 packages... (?) checking > this out now. > > > > Thank you, > > -- > Waitman Gobble > San Jose California USA Looks like i'm missing qt4-gui-4.7.4_1 :-) waitman@hunny:/usr/home/waitman# uname -a FreeBSD hunny.waitman.net 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #1: Mon Mar 26 19:48:52 PDT 2012 waitman@hunny.waitman.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KEYSHIA amd64 waitman@hunny:/usr/home/waitman# pkg_info | grep qt4 qt4-4.7.4 Multiplatform C++ application framework (metaport) qt4-accessible-4.7.4 Qt accessibility widgets qt4-assistant-4.7.4_1 Qt documentation browser qt4-clucene-4.7.4 QtCLucene full text search library wrapper qt4-corelib-4.7.4 Qt core library qt4-dbus-4.7.4 Qt4 bindings for the D-BUS messaging system qt4-declarative-4.7.4 Qt4 framework for building highly dynamic user interfaces qt4-designer-4.7.4_1 Qt ui editor qt4-doc-4.7.4 Multiplatform C++ application framework qt4-graphicssystems-opengl-4.7.4 OpenGL rendering engine (experimental) qt4-gui-4.7.4 Qt graphical user interface library qt4-help-4.7.4 QtHelp module provides QHelpEngine API and is used by Assis qt4-iconengines-4.7.4 Qt SVG icon engine plugin qt4-imageformats-4.7.4 Qt imageformat plugins for GIF, JPEG, MNG and SVG qt4-inputmethods-4.7.4 Qt input method plugins qt4-l10n-4.7.4 Qt translations messages qt4-multimedia-4.7.4 Qt4 low-level multimedia API qt4-network-4.7.4 Qt network library qt4-opengl-4.7.4 Qt OpenGL library qt4-qdbusviewer-4.7.4 Qt4 D-BUS viewer qt4-qt3support-4.7.4 Qt3 compatibility library qt4-qtconfig-4.7.4 Qt graphical configuration utility qt4-qtestlib-4.7.4 Qt unit testing library qt4-qvfb-4.7.4 Qt virtual framebuffer utility qt4-script-4.7.4 Qt script qt4-scripttools-4.7.4 Qt script qt4-sql-4.7.4 Qt SQL library qt4-sqlite-plugin-4.7.4 Qt SQLite 3.x database plugin qt4-svg-4.7.4 Qt SVG library qt4-webkit-4.7.4 Qt4 WebKit engine qt4-xml-4.7.4 Qt XML library qt4-xmlpatterns-4.7.4 XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 support for Qt4 qt4-xmlpatterns-tool-4.7.4 Qt4 command line utility for running XQueries waitman@hunny:/usr/home/waitman# pkg_info | grep qtcreator qtcreator-2.4.1 Qt Creator IDE and tools interestingly I found that on my 386 machine qtcreator version is 2.0.1 but qt4 version 4.7.4 Not sure at the moment how I managed to fetch an old version of qtcreator... which seems to work without the MIT_SHM problem. I checked and 2.4.1 is whats on 368/latest packages. -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA --bound1332993238-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 04:11:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2571065670 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:11:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F268FC12 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 808115C22 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:25:09 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F73E0F5.6080304@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:11:33 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F71A789.3030502@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4F71A789.3030502@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: libreoffice-3.4.5.2 failing to build X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:11:36 -0000 On 03/27/12 21:42, Da Rock wrote: > I've been hunting down some info on why this is failing, but all I > keep running into is the previous versions failings... :( > > I'm building libreoffice on 9.0-Release amd64, and I'm getting build > errors qa testing(?) sd. I followed the instructions, but it still > failed. It spits out this: > > scripting deliver > deliver -- version: 275594 > module 'scripting' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 28 files > unchanged > terminate called after throwing an instance of > 'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException' > /usr/local/bin/bash: line 1: 2019 Abort trap: 6 (core dumped) > [ a whole lot of code (I'm copying by hand, so it is a bit > overwhelming) - involving clone/impress/sd/unxfbsd.pro, solver, and > qa_unit ] > dmake: Error code 134, while making 'test' > gb_LinkTarget_add_library_objects,CppunitTest/libtest_sc_ucalc.so,sc > gb_LinkTarget_add_linktarget_objects,CppunitTest/libtest_sc_ucalc.so,Library/libscfb.so > > [ build all ] top level modules: sc > [ build all ] loaded modules: sc > [ build cut ] sc_ucalc > Abort trap (core dumped) > terminate called after throwing an instance of > 'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException' > gmake[1]: *** > [/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-bootstrap-3.4.5.2/solver/340/unxfbsd.pro/workdir/CppunitTest/sc_ucalc.test] > Error 1 > dmake: Error code 2, while making 'all' > [ build all ] top level modules: sw > [ build all ] loaded modules: sw > [ build all ] loaded modules: sw > [ build log ] sw > sw deliver > deliver -- version: 275594 > Module 'sw' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 1 files unchanged > > ----------------------------------------------------- > [ standard error message with webpage link to debug page ] > > internal build errors: > > ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making > /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-bootstrap-3.4.5.2/sd/qa/unit > ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making > /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-bootstrap-3.4.5.2/sc/prj > > [ instructions to build sd part of the build to isolate the issue ] > > As I mentioned I followed the directions and still hit the same error > filed above (if more of the data is needed I guess I'll have to find a > way to post it...). > > I'm on a deadline for this one, so I have to get this to work. How > should I further debug this to fix it? Or failing that (as an extreme > last resort), will an older package already built work IF it is built > for 8.2? After a portsnap update I still get core dumps in the calc/sc/cppunittester and the impress/sd/qa/unit/cppunittester. I've tried turning off make jobs, and I also checked the core files (when I finally found them). The only clue I have is this: #0 0x00000008016bca7c in ?? This is in _both_ core files, and although its not very helpful it says its stopping in exactly the same place (duh). Seriously guys, where do I go from here? Googling isn't exactly offering up much - my searches can be as much as 7 results (usually my own stuff or duplicates of the same). Or, as my last resort, can I use the 8.2 package instead? Need some serious pointers, pleeease... :) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 05:02:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D3E8106566C; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 05:02:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from royce.williams@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F2D8FC14; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 05:02:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so3210826iah.13 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:02:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=79PQf5BTHrXAxhqPrFLj2iqA1l0TkwpkH+146+HEBcw=; b=C1JTm8L9JOj3GlE5lrkDlzUaYLK7/5Sj5t7gE6xksypqOiNlzK/qU4VikLSqZYbU4D YiC5XfgJnvAyiI0wVBiL55qgrw9guhVzE79+JKRMbZVbmMVvVwrbtip8uH7LcY97tmFV 7h+b9ORYvGF6KclnlBgykZhllqyZ03ZMs2/ZvfKt59eHUEj4Nd0BpB+I7zHrNiWDsT+h EfzfgbotP8nO3yUDgrMtbGr9pRSGG0hE6mRZ0nCyqJG4QAXNTXug2Jdvk9w0vROGvJs+ KbaH3Cj9zAB+kzTXSTpU8w6ULmT1gvMVasdC8kLcwZlzoBUH3oxGoOsMmXIdF5c6+9dO NWTg== Received: by 10.50.155.226 with SMTP id vz2mr451248igb.39.1332997336203; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:02:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.39.20 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:01:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F72390D.1040101@freebsd.org> References: <4F72390D.1040101@freebsd.org> From: Royce Williams Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:01:55 -0800 Message-ID: To: Rene Ladan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, David Whytcross Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: boinc-setiathome-enhanced-6.12_2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 05:02:17 -0000 On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Rene Ladan wrote: > On 24-03-2012 08:04, David Whytcross wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> am hoping you may be able to assist with an enquiry >> my FreeBSD 9.0 machine is fitted with an NVIDIA GEForce 210 card >> is it possible to utilize its CUDA GPU operability into >> boinc_setiathome_enhanced 6.12_1 > > Currently not I guess, I guess this would also require CUDA support from the > X.org drivers. Previously, jhb had some CUDA rigged up using linux_base on amd64: http://blogs.freebsdish.org/jhb/2010/07/20/using-cuda-with-the-native-freebsdamd64-nvidia-driver/ Royce From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 07:42:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A41106566B; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:42:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055AD14DE41; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F74124D.3000801@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:42:05 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Scheidell References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:42:06 -0000 On 3/28/2012 8:21 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > Looking for an FAQ on PORTREVISION bumps on commits, pr's. If the package is going to change, it needs to be bumped. It's unfortunate that we don't have more flexibility in the system, but it is what it is. > Basically, I make the decision based on 'hey, if I was running a cronjob > to do a portupgrade -Rr every night, would I want this to be upgraded'? > > I know if something is broken across all builds, it doesn't need a > portrevision bump. Personally, if it's broken for i386 and amd64, it doesn't need a bump. The likelihood that it's broken for those 2 but working on anything else is near-zero, and the likelihood that anyone would care is even smaller. > If portversion is bumped, portrevision needs to be reset to 0 (line > deleted from Makefile) > pkg-plist changed (except for tweaks for portdocs/portexamples) portdocs/portexamples are included by default, so changes there need a bump. > options change? I would think so, I see 'make config' called sometimes > on portrevision bump, so I assume if I change the defaults, or add an > option that changes build, I should bump it. Right. > What about things like removing a run_depends that isn't nessessary? Yes, that changes the package. > ie: > > build_depends= This \ That \ TheOther > run_depends+= $build_depends > > but, in reality, you only need 'that' to run. > > build_depends= This \ That \ TheOther > run_depends = that Also changes the package, and in a way that's particularly important to the package itself, since only run deps get installed along with it. > Would the average OP want to rebuild the package just to eliminate the > extra run depends? I am thinking, not. why bother? See above. Also the PH section on why we have a separation between RUN_ and BUILD_ in the first place. hth, Doug From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 07:49:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F5C106564A for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:49:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 850A514D985; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:49:52 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F741420.1030403@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:49:52 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Frowly References: <1332779060.10007.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1332779060.10007.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" , "henry.hu.sh@gmail.com" Subject: Re: x11/slim env data gets lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:49:53 -0000 On 3/26/2012 9:24 AM, Steve Frowly wrote: > It's as if slim does not load /etc/login.conf I like slim for its small size, but it doesn't play nice with a variety of things (this is one of them). I solved the problem you described with environment variables by actually including them in my .xsession file. (In order to accommodate a variety of WMs my .xinitrc just calls .xsession, so everything gets the same environment.) Setting those things in .xsession isn't elegant, but it works, and ensures that the WM/DE itself has the same basic stuff (such as PATH) as my shells do. hth, Doug From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 07:54:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE8B1065673 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:54:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E94164499; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:54:23 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F74152F.4090302@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:54:23 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How useful is %%DATADIR%%, anyway? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:54:57 -0000 On 3/23/2012 1:14 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > Just as a thought, I decided to try stripping out all mentions of > %%DATADIR%%, %%DOCSDIR%% etc from pkg-plist, and replacing them with > PORTDOCS=*, PORTDATA=* in the Makefiles etc. How much time does creating the dynamic plists take for ports with larger numbers of docs/data, vs. the static lists; and how many ports would be adversely affected, if any? In regards to the idea itself, I like dynamic (or more dynamic) plist generation whenever possible, so I think you're going the right direction. One small note, some of us use a construction like this: PORTDOCS= foo bar baz post-install: .for file in ${PORTDOCS} ... .endfor So taking into consideration that '*' might not always be literally '*', I'm in favor. hth, Doug From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 11:44:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07BE1106564A; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:44:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7478FC14; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:44:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F5A7E821; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 03:44:56 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4F744B21.2020401@acsalaska.net> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:44:33 +0200 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman , Ports FreeBSD References: <4F6CE755.8020502@FreeBSD.org> <4F6D07C0.5040602@freebsd.org> <4F6D0BF9.2090700@acsalaska.net> <4F6D99F7.2010103@FreeBSD.org> <4F6E676A.70409@acsalaska.net> <4F6EE163.3000804@FreeBSD.org> <4F6F20B7.1060801@acsalaska.net> <4F6F424A.4040608@FreeBSD.org> <4F737CF1.3030008@acsalaska.net> <4F742150.9040207@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F742150.9040207@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: PORTWWW proposal (Was: Re: How useful is %%DATADIR%%, anyway?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:44:59 -0000 Hi all, so we took this off list for a bit to work out an implementation. On 3/29/2012 10:46, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 28/03/2012 22:04, Mel Flynn wrote: >> I'm not sure about exclusion. I have an implementation up here: >> http://redports.org/browser/melflynn/net-mgmt/observium/bsd.www.mk >> >> The problem with -not -path $glob is that it isn't the inverse of inclusion: >> PORTWWW= html >> will only find the dir html and everything below it. >> PORTWWWEXCLUDE= html >> will only exclude the html dir but not everything below it. The correct >> way to write this would be: >> PORTWWWEXCLUDE= html html/* >> >> I also can't see a way to do this, since: >> html/* - won't match the file named html and we can't test for -d/-f >> html* - will also match the paths html.php and htmladmin which may be >> undesired. >> >> I suppose one can document it to not abuse the exclusion for directories >> but strictly for files. > > Hmmm... yes. The '-not -path "/foo/bar"' construction (not using > wildcards) really only works with files. To stop find(1) recursing into > a whole directory subtree by naming the top of that subtree you'ld use > -prune. With wildcards, yes, it is different, . Since -prune is always true, it's a whole different beast that requires wrapping any other arguments into -o \( ... -print \). It won't work well here. > There is some precedence for using separate variables for files vs > directories: see PLIST_DIRS, PLIST_DIRSTRY and PLIST_FILES. If we separate exclusion into files and dirs, things get a lot easier, as we can simply use -not -path '${WWWDIR}/${glob}' -not -path '${WWWDIR}/${glob}/*' for a directory. The only question is whether to use PORTWWWEXCLUDE_FILES explicitly or have PORTWWWEXCLUDE be the files one. > There's also the @dirrm vs @dirrmtry question. Yes, I thought about that. I think it can be done with some post-processing, rewriting @dirrm foo to @dirrmtry foo for dirs matching PORTWWW_DIRSTRY. > Anyhow, would you consider publishing your work on freebsd-ports@... so > more interested parties can comment on it? I think it has promise and > I'll have a go trying to apply it to some of my ports over the next week > or so. If it can work correctly with www/rt40 then it should work for > anything. I'll have these changes incorporated later tonight. While there's now a lot of variables to consider, it's hard to loose sight of the fact that the common case will only use PORTWWW=* + the exclusion of one or two configuration files. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 14:45:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE07F1065673 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:45:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kayasaman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f42.google.com (mail-qa0-f42.google.com [209.85.216.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838FE8FC12 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:45:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qafi31 with SMTP id i31so469999qaf.15 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:45:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aRcsTExDX1dzIy/kBQbcht1pGnUvEdwEGADwS2qejKI=; b=JKLplDga+yh4h/IYnA40Y/ZD9fZz5rRR7LERq6QGJBMNZeUHkYSHmLm1/RzGSRhOZc eTm2U1//c0ZvxNBNyOk26rQlJOO+Hfyzmw+aXkHYhmg6FwW57WB88UKPeS8kszmVY8XJ The0Wv9L/x8PbXkOxLiwwuAc5G/R5IWgDbOa/SjUjNQRnCFoLhp/awh9EtDqlPppZG/x dXrrD5oYKP96qBetIM6WPdmmFC8x9XmQ/ysmPjpos2ToXiVRjJSIFPKTnYeHqQgLM2uU VOhv8gwNxQpJj8GrD4d6+w1ZRv7whe8gStoQrGX4KwjFvZ1OSG1d/e1aBFFAh5VIhEqX w0Hg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.180.1 with SMTP id bs1mr627994qab.2.1333032331703; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:45:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.187.130 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:45:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:45:31 +0100 Message-ID: From: Kaya Saman To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: jabberd port doesn't come with any certificates and is not allowing authorization? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:45:40 -0000 Hi, I've recently built the jabberd port and upgraded to the latest version: 2.x I'm having major problems in configuring it though and was wondering if someone could either give me a hand or help me generate certificates for it which are mentioned in the config file but not within the /usr/local/etc/jabberd directory. I'm experiencing this issue: Mar 29 16:33:48 JABBER jabberd/c2s[1498]: [8] [10.0.0.10, port=59032] connect Mar 29 16:33:48 JABBER jabberd/c2s[1498]: [8] got pre STARTTLS packet, dropping Mar 29 16:33:48 JABBER jabberd/c2s[1498]: [8] [10.0.0.10, port=59032] disconnect jid=unbound, packets: 1 This is my realm information: jabber.com jabber.com may publicly exist however, this is a trial done in Vbox and totally offline just so I can understand the necessary mechanisms involved as to learn how the jabberd server functions! I'm using Pidgin as the IM client who is configured like: Username: user Domain: jabber.com Password: Local Alias: user_alias Use encrypted connections if available Allow plaintext auth over unencrypted streams Connect server: srv.jabber.com On the client I keep getting: "Policy Violation" error. It's really weird but there seems to be a lack of documentation as I managed to find the stuff for jabberd version 1.4, for version 2.x I've followed some URL's: http://www.jms1.net/jabberd2/ http://www.indiangnu.org/2009/how-to-configure-jabber-jabberd2-with-mysqlpam-as-auth-database/ http://bionicraptor.co/2011/07/25/how-to-encrypt-jabberd2-communications/ http://bionicraptor.co/2011/05/20/how-to-install-and-configure-japperd2-with-mysql/ But still nothing is working, I believe it's to do with the security as in using encrypted or unencrypted connections but I can't be certain... there doesn't seem to be any mysql DB creation script either that I could find?? Is there a fix or am I stuck?? Regards, Kaya From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 14:52:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF9E106566C; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:52:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: from z.umatar.com (z.umatar.com [66.135.39.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F97C8FC16; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:52:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from z.umatar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2TEqKQH061237; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:52:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: (from uzimac@localhost) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q2TEqKbN061236; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:52:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) X-Authentication-Warning: z.umatar.com: uzimac set sender to uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com using -f From: "Waitman Gobble" To: "Waitman Gobble" Message-Id: <1333032740.60573@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Originating-IP: 75.36.145.148 X-Mailer: Usermin 1.500 In-Reply-To: <1332993238.55656@da3m0n8t3r.com> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:52:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1333032740" Cc: kde@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: blank window form with qtcreator package (update: building from ports) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:52:21 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1333032740 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Waitman Gobble wrote .. > Waitman Gobble wrote .. > > Waitman Gobble wrote .. > > > Chris Rees wrote .. > > > > Forwarding to more appropriate list, and CCing kde@ > > > > > > > > On 28 March 2012 15:55, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I am having an issue with qtcreator (using pkg_add) from http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages/Latest/ > > > > > running FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64/SMP > > > > > > > > > > When I start qtcreator a grey window form appears which is totally blank. > > Note > > > > that the other Qt apps appear to function (ie, qtdesigner). > > > > > > > > > > On another machine running FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT i386 (32bit) with the corresponding > > > > Qt packages installed, qtcreator runs as expected. > > > > > > > > > > Pointers for troubleshooting appreciated! > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Waitman Gobble > > > > > San Jose California USA > > > > > > other details: using Xfce4. new system build within past few days so packages/system > > > should be "close-to" latest. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > -- > > > Waitman Gobble > > > San Jose California USA > > > > Figured out the problem, I was looking at reinstalling Qt and noticed pkg_updating.. > > mentions issue 2012-03-13 about MIT-SHM. I didn't catch this error before using > > the launcher icon, but when starting qtcreator from terminal I notice the error > > about MIT-SHM.. searched a bit and found this page: > > > > http://forums.freebsd.org/archive/index.php/t-29770.html > > > > seems that > > # sysctl kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed=1 > > > > fixes the problem... qtcreator then starts properly with stuff on the form (ie, > > not blank). > > > > so... I suppose the explanation seems to be that > > qt4-gui-4.7.4_1 is not yet available in the /Latest amd64 packages... (?) checking > > this out now. > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > -- > > Waitman Gobble > > San Jose California USA > > > Looks like i'm missing qt4-gui-4.7.4_1 :-) > > > > waitman@hunny:/usr/home/waitman# uname -a > FreeBSD hunny.waitman.net 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #1: Mon Mar 26 19:48:52 > PDT 2012 waitman@hunny.waitman.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KEYSHIA amd64 > > waitman@hunny:/usr/home/waitman# pkg_info | grep qt4 > qt4-4.7.4 Multiplatform C++ application framework (metaport) > qt4-accessible-4.7.4 Qt accessibility widgets > qt4-assistant-4.7.4_1 Qt documentation browser > qt4-clucene-4.7.4 QtCLucene full text search library wrapper > qt4-corelib-4.7.4 Qt core library > qt4-dbus-4.7.4 Qt4 bindings for the D-BUS messaging system > qt4-declarative-4.7.4 Qt4 framework for building highly dynamic user interfaces > qt4-designer-4.7.4_1 Qt ui editor > qt4-doc-4.7.4 Multiplatform C++ application framework > qt4-graphicssystems-opengl-4.7.4 OpenGL rendering engine (experimental) > qt4-gui-4.7.4 Qt graphical user interface library > qt4-help-4.7.4 QtHelp module provides QHelpEngine API and is used by Assis > qt4-iconengines-4.7.4 Qt SVG icon engine plugin > qt4-imageformats-4.7.4 Qt imageformat plugins for GIF, JPEG, MNG and SVG > qt4-inputmethods-4.7.4 Qt input method plugins > qt4-l10n-4.7.4 Qt translations messages > qt4-multimedia-4.7.4 Qt4 low-level multimedia API > qt4-network-4.7.4 Qt network library > qt4-opengl-4.7.4 Qt OpenGL library > qt4-qdbusviewer-4.7.4 Qt4 D-BUS viewer > qt4-qt3support-4.7.4 Qt3 compatibility library > qt4-qtconfig-4.7.4 Qt graphical configuration utility > qt4-qtestlib-4.7.4 Qt unit testing library > qt4-qvfb-4.7.4 Qt virtual framebuffer utility > qt4-script-4.7.4 Qt script > qt4-scripttools-4.7.4 Qt script > qt4-sql-4.7.4 Qt SQL library > qt4-sqlite-plugin-4.7.4 Qt SQLite 3.x database plugin > qt4-svg-4.7.4 Qt SVG library > qt4-webkit-4.7.4 Qt4 WebKit engine > qt4-xml-4.7.4 Qt XML library > qt4-xmlpatterns-4.7.4 XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 support for Qt4 > qt4-xmlpatterns-tool-4.7.4 Qt4 command line utility for running XQueries > > waitman@hunny:/usr/home/waitman# pkg_info | grep qtcreator > qtcreator-2.4.1 Qt Creator IDE and tools > > interestingly I found that on my 386 machine qtcreator version is 2.0.1 but qt4 > version 4.7.4 > Not sure at the moment how I managed to fetch an old version of qtcreator... which > seems to work without the MIT_SHM problem. > I checked and 2.4.1 is whats on 368/latest packages. > > > -- > Waitman Gobble > San Jose California USA For some reason qt4 package on amd64 does not install qmake. (I might need a tools package or something, but i don't remember doing that on the 386 machine) anyway, I removed Qt4 packages and built from src / ports tree. make in /usr/ports/devel/qt4 fails with 'ld cannot find -lQtDbus' - looks like it's in the webkit build section when it fails. to get it going, make install in /usr/ports/devel/dbus-qt4/ (or /usr/ports/devel/qt4-qdbusviewer/) then return to /usr/ports/devel/qt4 and make will continue... for some reason it's not catching the dependency... might be an issue to check out (?) Thanks, -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA --bound1333032740-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 15:30:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27A01065670 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:30:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E158FC1A for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:30:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2TFUTc9099402 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:30:35 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q2TFUTc9099402 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q2TFUTc9099402; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none Message-ID: <4F74800E.6070503@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:30:22 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kaya Saman References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig252CBA57D459114E55279E92" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: jabberd port doesn't come with any certificates and is not allowing authorization? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:30:39 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig252CBA57D459114E55279E92 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 29/03/2012 15:45, Kaya Saman wrote: > I've recently built the jabberd port and upgraded to the latest version= : 2.x Actually jabberd2 (net-im/jabberd) is a completely different different project to jabberd14 (net-im/jabber) -- it's not "upgrading" so much as switching to a different piece of software. In any case, jabberd2 is the correct choice: it is being actively developed and is keeping abreast of the various XMPP extensions that are being published. > I'm having major problems in configuring it though and was wondering > if someone could either give me a hand or help me generate > certificates for it which are mentioned in the config file but not > within the /usr/local/etc/jabberd directory. >=20 >=20 > I'm experiencing this issue: >=20 > Mar 29 16:33:48 JABBER jabberd/c2s[1498]: [8] [10.0.0.10, port=3D59032]= connect > Mar 29 16:33:48 JABBER jabberd/c2s[1498]: [8] got pre STARTTLS packet, = dropping > Mar 29 16:33:48 JABBER jabberd/c2s[1498]: [8] [10.0.0.10, port=3D59032]= > disconnect jid=3Dunbound, packets: 1 Your client is attempting to switch its connection to using TLS. This is good, especially if you are using a SASL method of LOGIN or PASSWORD -- otherwise it would send passwords across the net in plain test. > This is my realm information: >=20 >=20 > pemfile=3D'/usr/local/etc/jabberd/server.pem' > verify-mode=3D'0' > cachain=3D'/usr/local/etc/jabberd/client_ca_certs.pem' > require-starttls=3D'false' > register-enable=3D'true' > instructions=3D'Enter a username and password to register with > this server.' > register-oob=3D'http://srv.jabber.com/register' > password-change=3D'true' > >jabber.com > >=20 >=20 > jabber.com may publicly exist however, this is a trial done in Vbox > and totally offline just so I can understand the necessary mechanisms > involved as to learn how the jabberd server functions! You've got both 'register-enable' and 'register-oob' -- you probably don't want both of those, unless you do have an out-of-band method to create user accounts. Presumably you have created the required server x509 certificate. If you're doing it on the cheap, that means a self-signed certificate. In which case there simply won't be a cain of CA certs to worry about. I'd also recommend require-starttls=3D'true' Of course, there's a lot more to setting up jabberd than just this little section of one of the config files. > I'm using Pidgin as the IM client who is configured like: >=20 > Username: user > Domain: jabber.com > Password: > Local Alias: user_alias > Use encrypted connections if available <<<---*** > Allow plaintext auth over unencrypted streams <<<---*** > Connect server: srv.jabber.com Those two marked items are not a good idea. If you're using login to authenticate the SASL libraries expect you to use TLS to secure the transaction, and the way of least resistance is to do so. > On the client I keep getting: "Policy Violation" error. >=20 >=20 > It's really weird but there seems to be a lack of documentation as I > managed to find the stuff for jabberd version 1.4, for version 2.x > I've followed some URL's: >=20 > http://www.jms1.net/jabberd2/ >=20 > http://www.indiangnu.org/2009/how-to-configure-jabber-jabberd2-with-mys= qlpam-as-auth-database/ >=20 > http://bionicraptor.co/2011/07/25/how-to-encrypt-jabberd2-communication= s/ >=20 > http://bionicraptor.co/2011/05/20/how-to-install-and-configure-japperd2= -with-mysql/ >=20 >=20 > But still nothing is working, I believe it's to do with the security > as in using encrypted or unencrypted connections but I can't be > certain... there doesn't seem to be any mysql DB creation script > either that I could find?? Look in /usr/local/share/doc/jabberd I originally implemented jabberd2 using a MySQL database, but have switched to PostgreSQL. Which RDBMs you use won't make a whole lot of difference unless your traffic levels grow to pretty enormous levels. In fact, for a lightly used system, sqlite would be a reasonable choice. > Is there a fix or am I stuck?? Well, I have jabberd2 up and running quite happily. I don't remember setting it up as being particularly traumatic. I just read the docco, followed the install guide here: https://github.com/Jabberd2/jabberd2/wiki/InstallGuide (which is linked to from the jabberd2 home page at http://jabberd2.xiaoka.com/) and the comments in the sample .xml files and it all worked fine after the usual sort of testing and debugging. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig252CBA57D459114E55279E92 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk90gBUACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzQeQCfXqVn4iFS719JXI7NJTpDcaHx q64AoIpGA5lGLohZYZlymzAiuh6qO1n+ =cZxg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig252CBA57D459114E55279E92-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 18:50:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FAC106566C for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:50:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@experts-exchange.com) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.pub.dw.redsrci.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D0D8FC08 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:50:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280C86FF955 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:50:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=e-e.com; h= user-agent:organization:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:message-id:subject:subject:from:from :date:date:received:received:received; s=ee; t=1333047017; x= 1334861417; bh=bZ2XpRsntSXjAkENr6VD7IVjL8SQmEUdfHGrBNwZ2ho=; b=R nIBszXTmhVbHsU5FONuHTLW9v25KeoGmSju8kIITKIccZOsyA9pYmPzXtW8u9anz t69ufM0q3LYQyrStbQCa04ckIzvgcWH9L4yc5yIBRKVPfm83cmZHSbi1VZHlRlGJ TjPj6DFt4WB3YD2RlVUKT8rVS9ck4OVZe81HV1sU4w= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.dw.redsrci.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NCJTb6ZsTV7M for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:50:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from experts-exchange.com (unknown [192.168.103.120]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 05CE66FF948 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:50:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 2072 invoked by uid 1001); Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:49:22 -0000 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:49:21 -0700 From: Jason Helfman To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120329184921.GA2021@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE amd64 Organization: Experts-Exchange, LLC. http://www.experts-exchange.com X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: post-deinstall target is invalid X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:50:23 -0000 Howdy Porters, I just finished clobbering all of the post-deinstall targets that were in the portstree. Currently, this is an invalid target to use in a port. Please use the default pkg-deinstall file: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/book.html#PKG-FILES or, use SUB_FILES: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/book.html#USING-SUB-FILES I will work on a effort, as well, to get some supporting documentation into the Porter's Handbook. Many thanks, Jason -- Jason Helfman System Administrator experts-exchange.com http://www.experts-exchange.com/M_4830110.html E4AD 7CF1 1396 27F6 79DD 4342 5E92 AD66 8C8C FBA5 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 19:47:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76FC106564A for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:47:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529AC8FC08 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:47:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.mypc.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD98D14E71A2; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:47:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at server.mypc.hu Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9qE26n0RyweB; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:47:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.117] (catv-80-98-232-12.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.232.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B9DC14E7175; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:47:42 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4F74BC4F.70801@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:47:27 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0a2) Gecko/20120301 Thunderbird/12.0a2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Helfman References: <20120329184921.GA2021@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> In-Reply-To: <20120329184921.GA2021@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: post-deinstall target is invalid X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:47:52 -0000 On 2012.03.29. 20:49, Jason Helfman wrote: > I will work on a effort, as well, to get some supporting documentation > into > the Porter's Handbook. Jason, thanks for this cleanup work. Have you checked if there is any portlint check for this? It would also be very valuable. Gabor From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 20:03:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3C71065676 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:03:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@acm.org) Received: from fallbackmx09.syd.optusnet.com.au (fallbackmx09.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6307C8FC1C for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail27.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail27.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.133.168]) by fallbackmx09.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q2TK2q0o032376 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:02:52 +1100 Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (c220-239-116-103.belrs4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.116.103]) by mail27.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q2TK2itb026863 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:02:45 +1100 X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (localhost.vk2pj.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2TK2hwG077003; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:02:43 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2TK2hc5077002; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:02:43 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:02:43 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: "Philip M. Gollucci" Message-ID: <20120329200243.GA76833@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org> <63ca1b333a310ecc2b1d1f0e1e1542a1.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> <4F7338C3.8020003@p6m7g8.com> <4F733C3A.7020004@missouri.edu> <4F734524.2000400@p6m7g8.com> <4F735340.1020103@FreeBSD.org> <4F7379FD.9040802@p6m7g8.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F7379FD.9040802@p6m7g8.com> X-PGP-Key: http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:03:00 -0000 --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2012-Mar-28 20:52:13 +0000, "Philip M. Gollucci" w= rote: >Absolutely, b/c we maintain PORTREVISION for pointyhat not the end users This is completely backwards. The Project exists for end-users and end users need a way to determine when there's been a change to a port that needs them to re-install that port. Pointyhat provides automated testing facilities as a way to improve the quality of FreeBSD because not all committers are sufficiently careful. If PORTREVISION cannot adequately serve both end users & pointyhat, then the ports system needs an additional, new flag to trigger pointyhat. --=20 Peter Jeremy --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk90v+MACgkQ/opHv/APuIfODgCgiA3WJS5KrhWulnlgarzbQWWV VEsAnAoKKEuVCjeEauGJ9gFwv52v7OWB =43zR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 20:12:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F293106567A for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:12:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5F38FC1C for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DACF621C37 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:12:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFE32621C0E for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:12:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from macintosh.secnap.com (10.70.3.3) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:12:46 -0400 Message-ID: <4F74C23E.7060808@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:12:46 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org> <63ca1b333a310ecc2b1d1f0e1e1542a1.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> <4F7338C3.8020003@p6m7g8.com> <4F733C3A.7020004@missouri.edu> <4F734524.2000400@p6m7g8.com> <4F735340.1020103@FreeBSD.org> <4F7379FD.9040802@p6m7g8.com> <20120329200243.GA76833@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20120329200243.GA76833@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:12:48 -0000 On 3/29/12 4:02 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2012-Mar-28 20:52:13 +0000, "Philip M. Gollucci" wrote: >> Absolutely, b/c we maintain PORTREVISION for pointyhat not the end users > This is completely backwards. The Project exists for end-users and There are no end users. You must belong to that 'end user' cult, and me and the MCP will have to educate you. There are no end users. The computer exists for the MCP, and the MCP only. Q: have you now, or do you know anyone who thinks they saw an end user? Can you give me their names and email addresses so we can re-educate them? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 20:41:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9E9106564A; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:41:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@experts-exchange.com) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.pub.dw.redsrci.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0338FC15; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:41:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D41B6FFB59; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:41:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=e-e.com; h= user-agent:organization:in-reply-to:content-disposition :content-type:content-type:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:subject:from:from:date:date:received:received:received; s=ee; t=1333053671; x=1334868071; bh=1wZ1fNy9U3ONfOCWYmBawuEuZq soqSxXw+p+APW7pPQ=; b=Q55UtV2oTMuG9ufyYPxXmrH3kX33Ful8D7gwpqe78g V5SUuEahQXq10uG2mxMiRrMHitSlWsH1NX0teRPTMzowx4S5x9/7D6EVnrjk4+Oe RZnws/TtFxOWY6bG9J/Ql3J9PshOEeJWo9dGzMlQLc5W48dd+MzYpz4L8Y1TZoFg A= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.dw.redsrci.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 95t5IUCL+T0v; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:41:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from experts-exchange.com (unknown [192.168.103.120]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 59DB16FFB56; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:41:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 8588 invoked by uid 1001); Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:40:16 -0000 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:40:16 -0700 From: Jason Helfman To: Gabor Kovesdan Message-ID: <20120329204016.GT82505@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> References: <20120329184921.GA2021@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <4F74BC4F.70801@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F74BC4F.70801@FreeBSD.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE amd64 Organization: Experts-Exchange, LLC. http://www.experts-exchange.com X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: post-deinstall target is invalid X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:41:12 -0000 On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 09:47:27PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan thus spake: >On 2012.03.29. 20:49, Jason Helfman wrote: >> I will work on a effort, as well, to get some supporting documentation >> into >> the Porter's Handbook. >Jason, thanks for this cleanup work. Have you checked if there is any >portlint check for this? It would also be very valuable. > >Gabor > Your welcome, and thanks. I did consider it, however it was also noted to me that portlint shouldn't take the place of poor port coding. That doesn't mean it can't be done, but I also tend to agree with this. Perhaps adding logic to bpm would be a good way to wrap it up, as well. -jgh -- Jason Helfman System Administrator experts-exchange.com http://www.experts-exchange.com/M_4830110.html E4AD 7CF1 1396 27F6 79DD 4342 5E92 AD66 8C8C FBA5 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 23:30:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80DC01065675 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:30:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@dataix.net) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00FA8FC1B for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so135852iah.13 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:30:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dataix.net; s=rsa; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=T/ocRPTtviMWuvMLVTSvujFZQOKe9hJyRrx6Imjk5nY=; b=HaMa7tMMqk/csmTJaZVMyGk0J53dUbfRJA/UXKiYCXYvCHqtxA6ECkNOGXBQScN8XG 617FWQbvmKhU7vkJEgArxJ3y2P9t90IEcrtSa0NsGpNXfqWRupmtuSpDLtD6U6by7CG+ ZWIkz3ebv9nX9xOrOq8WjU01Tt1xKNnG3a7NI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-gm-message-state; bh=T/ocRPTtviMWuvMLVTSvujFZQOKe9hJyRrx6Imjk5nY=; b=T6ViP0lvF/SXe8VbS1ePpFtK/vtUyzRHQllETjgTHmkb5mMiRfyiknNfwLCv49iUma Ey7ZLLR9wTAzt+cqgFHU3ZVaOC0eYlkoaTSvwgOrfQ9b8KOuhZl21K+k6FENf5bW99tv 1GOUNmTZ+P/IO8VI4L+vSM5fjowtC3jY+hP9HOntSGLzgYs/ij2qGo9uyJ6AVcrrP2vX 3bZHW5ZLtu9EDtTpTLZqe/B1EPDpYX+CzdrKuWFYvPeYdtImnAL8slG5PSlFcTSQfoKf vK8f4ojBH0O7pA2776uXG5DdT0a6QEP5bfd7Z27yD2r0AbIfpHhmiGN6BtWUpaCKqQfw t2dg== Received: by 10.50.185.230 with SMTP id ff6mr2986509igc.70.1333063841399; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (adsl-99-19-43-184.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net. [99.19.43.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id kn3sm268774igc.15.2012.03.29.16.30.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:30:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2TNUcY9086410 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:30:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Received: (from jhellenthal@localhost) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2TNUc7g085923; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:30:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:30:38 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal To: Roman Bogorodskiy Message-ID: <20120329233037.GA98244@DataIX.net> References: <20120324172937.GA43822@DataIX.net> <20120325152632.GC1293@kloomba> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120325152632.GC1293@kloomba> X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlDsAApjW2wWnoV+yQMEXIg6ilEMt1fDb3FdJ1PpieGXXjTip1tZwwozWFm+rz0aTHsRF3B Cc: ports@freebsd.org, novel@freebsd.org Subject: Re: security/gnutls update when... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:30:43 -0000 --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable There are no problems with this that can be seen. Thank you Roman. On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 07:26:34PM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > Jason Hellenthal wrote: >=20 > >=20 > > Apparently this port has fell two versions behind. Is there anything > > that is going to happen to update it to the current stable version ? > >=20 > >=20 > > These advisories have been out for a week now. And the current version > > is 2.12.18. > >=20 > >=20 > > Database created: Sat Mar 24 13:15:03 EDT 2012 > > Affected package: gnutls-2.12.16 > > Type of problem: libtasn1 -- ASN.1 length decoding vulnerability. > > Reference: > > http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/2e7e9072-73a0-11e1-a883-001cc0a36e12.html > >=20 > > Affected package: gnutls-2.12.16 > > Type of problem: gnutls -- possible overflow/Denial of service > > vulnerabilities. > > Reference: > > http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/aecee357-739e-11e1-a883-001cc0a36e12.html > >=20 > > 2 problem(s) in your installed packages found. >=20 > The port was updated to 2.12.18 with some hacks to prevent shlib version > bump. Please report if you have any problems with that. >=20 > Roman Bogorodskiy --=20 ;s =3D; --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPdPCdAAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+60cH/Ao3Kdfy+XiVqFrmojGnJTZo 6BrwOo35pfJK4HD6LI3L/6lhA0sQRmSZs8gqgdkMzpIOKsYXa4Y6e6Xq2bD5ItG4 etvCN5E0nDRndLGX3TPf049QpE224AoD3a2XGqu3Ayw27w/HllLV6KdZRhVvC7qq OPbGLxqiKJWeyKGC5c77Goxv4B+/L2kuk/4f9FB4asejwrbm8aQ/BJybjZmuIe7p ZWOKCdo1q5VHQ4Hek1sgcat9j+VB9X5g9p7LIRRqhRzy3F9/Req5zf7NHE63XuX6 jUdANkE6qf8fEOZbrPo2jMKDRFtjgiMi94IoP2Xgi/ny/iTqOo8QEyN/fDZX+sA= =7k83 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 23:59:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B0A106566C for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:59:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john.marshall@riverwillow.com.au) Received: from mail1.riverwillow.net.au (mail1.riverwillow.net.au [203.58.93.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243B68FC1C for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:59:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rwpc13.mby.riverwillow.net.au (rwpc13.mby.riverwillow.net.au [172.25.24.200]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail1.riverwillow.net.au (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2TNi6Vw040599 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:44:06 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=riverwillow.com.au; s=m1001; t=1333064647; bh=ElBQUKqqT2Ajkqd0fhDxl7PjEfAu5A/cEH1Pq1OiB+0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=S8X6NMpWnz+FIVvnt0Xoz1Y1vq63KuEEt1SnVFC5dy3XmK/LFONgb9VWnj7ZsaHlj AFHyS3O3jmWeGa/utscO2FrgUrhIvHhySZXdvxzAMVoMurloIJp/V3CRDV2M8joKqJ HA6hqLvUMHtcwynqcFrBgJPioLCi1Nap5sH2J3mo= Received: from rwpc13.mby.riverwillow.net.au (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rwpc13.mby.riverwillow.net.au (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2TNi6Hk050531 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:44:06 +1100 (AEDT) (envelope-from john.marshall@riverwillow.com.au) Received: (from john@localhost) by rwpc13.mby.riverwillow.net.au (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2TNi6iS050530 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:44:06 +1100 (AEDT) (envelope-from john) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:44:06 +1100 From: John Marshall To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120329234406.GA23602@rwpc13.mby.riverwillow.net.au> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i OpenPGP: id=A29A84A2; url=http://pki.riverwillow.com.au/pgp/johnmarshall.asc Subject: databases/mysql55-client 5.5.22 fails to build on i386 WITH_OPENSSL X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:59:22 -0000 --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Attempts to build this port on i386 with WITH_OPENSSL (the default option) fail for me. I have tried four systems: 2 x 8.3-RC2 and 2 x 9.0-RELEASE. I don't have a 64-bit system available for test. All builds stop at the same place. Builds succeed on all systems if I set WITHOUT_OPENSSL. Build log: http://pastebin.com/eWczYT23 PR filed: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D166503 Note: In the PR I incorrectly refer to WITH_SSL instead of WITH_OPENSSL. Note: This has nothing to do with OpenSSL. The port's option name is misleading and simply includes/excludes the bundled yassl stuff. =3D=3D=3D> Building for mysql-client-5.5.22 ----< snip >---- Scanning dependencies of target yassl Scanning dependencies of target taocrypt ----< snip >---- [ 8%] Building CXX object extra/yassl/taocrypt/CMakeFiles/taocrypt.dir/src= /integer.cpp.o /usr/ports/databases/mysql55-client/work/mysql-5.5.22/extra/yassl/taocrypt/= src/integer.cpp: In member function 'typename TaoCrypt::AlignedAllocator= ::pointer TaoCrypt::AlignedAllocator::allocate(typename TaoCrypt::Alloca= torBase::size_type, const void*)': /usr/ports/databases/mysql55-client/work/mysql-5.5.22/extra/yassl/taocrypt/= src/integer.cpp:76: error: there are no arguments to 'max_size' that depend= on a template parameter, so a declaration of 'max_size' must be available /usr/ports/databases/mysql55-client/work/mysql-5.5.22/extra/yassl/taocrypt/= src/integer.cpp:76: error: (if you use '-fpermissive', G++ will accept your= code, but allowing the use of an undeclared name is deprecated) [ 9%] Building CXX object extra/yassl/CMakeFiles/yassl.dir/src/timer.cpp.o /usr/ports/databases/mysql55-client/work/mysql-5.5.22/extra/yassl/taocrypt/= src/integer.cpp: At global scope: /usr/ports/databases/mysql55-client/work/mysql-5.5.22/extra/yassl/taocrypt/= src/integer.cpp:1137: warning: 'TaoCrypt::s_RunAtStartupSetPentiumFunctionP= ointers' defined but not used *** Error code 1 1 error *** Error code 2 [ 9%] Building CXX object extra/yassl/CMakeFiles/yassl.dir/src/yassl_error= .cpp.o [ 10%] Building CXX object extra/yassl/CMakeFiles/yassl.dir/src/yassl_imp.c= pp.o [ 10%] Building CXX object extra/yassl/CMakeFiles/yassl.dir/src/yassl_int.c= pp.o [ 11%] Building CXX object extra/yassl/CMakeFiles/yassl.dir/src/template_in= stnt.cpp.o Linking CXX static library libyassl.a [ 11%] Built target yassl 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql55-client. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql55-client. --=20 John Marshall --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk9088YACgkQw/tAaKKahKIv9wCfYS+nD4GizvL/CtjI0iZAFnLi b/4AoI/pqWuqKdUHfRNi3YvoGWEbPTg0 =+AW6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 03:45:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A96106566B for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 03:45:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john.marshall@riverwillow.com.au) Received: from mail1.riverwillow.net.au (mail1.riverwillow.net.au [203.58.93.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D0688FC14 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 03:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.25.24.200] (rwpc13.mby.riverwillow.net.au [172.25.24.200]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail1.riverwillow.net.au (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2U3jQiE086859 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:45:27 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=riverwillow.com.au; s=m1001; t=1333079127; bh=MGCELGDN0ZwOdtj6I8HhG3Bf0teS6hmn3xYZzTBVFWQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=SYw7BhMad6A+qivMlWQ8N+LBrSzwyQSRshRGiKOYSdcpaa431hXriLpbu87XgtOwB A4mTFpoDxNiRDNqrLbmS825F5b4liA27hRbtfMJt3kCU2jZ+HqGYyva7PVdePPrJMR zmlNMShhXKIccHvVV95phNEDzHwNpkGyjkFrwXF0= Message-ID: <4F752C4D.2040504@riverwillow.com.au> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:45:17 +1100 From: John Marshall Organization: Riverwillow Pty Ltd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120322 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20120329234406.GA23602@rwpc13.mby.riverwillow.net.au> In-Reply-To: <20120329234406.GA23602@rwpc13.mby.riverwillow.net.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 OpenPGP: id=A29A84A2; url=http://pki.riverwillow.com.au/pgp/johnmarshall.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig479CEE74010CD752ED2F1197" Subject: Re: databases/mysql55-client 5.5.22 fails to build on i386 WITH_OPENSSL X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 03:45:31 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig479CEE74010CD752ED2F1197 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 30/03/2012 10:44, John Marshall wrote: > Attempts to build this port on i386 with WITH_OPENSSL (the default > option) fail for me. I have tried four systems: 2 x 8.3-RC2 and 2 x > 9.0-RELEASE. I don't have a 64-bit system available for test. All > builds stop at the same place. Builds succeed on all systems if I set > WITHOUT_OPENSSL. Builds OK WITH_OPENSSL on amd64 (8.2-RELEASE-p2) --=20 John Marshall --------------enig479CEE74010CD752ED2F1197 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk91LFQACgkQw/tAaKKahKIERgCbBR1nriEjhykexjiigX1Dc9eP aRQAoJAlQW6bZrl/1M0n7BzUFs1XtYw3 =oq2J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig479CEE74010CD752ED2F1197-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 06:22:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CDB1065673 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:22:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C683E8FC0C; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2U6MOA4031760; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:22:24 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2U6MOMZ031759; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:22:24 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:22:20 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Da Rock Message-ID: <20120330062219.GA49266@azathoth.lan> References: <4F71A789.3030502@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F73E0F5.6080304@herveybayaustralia.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F73E0F5.6080304@herveybayaustralia.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: libreoffice-3.4.5.2 failing to build X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:22:25 -0000 --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 02:11:33PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > On 03/27/12 21:42, Da Rock wrote: > > I've been hunting down some info on why this is failing, but all I=20 > > keep running into is the previous versions failings... :( > > > > I'm building libreoffice on 9.0-Release amd64, and I'm getting build=20 > > errors qa testing(?) sd. I followed the instructions, but it still=20 > > failed. It spits out this: > > > > scripting deliver > > deliver -- version: 275594 > > module 'scripting' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 28 files=20 > > unchanged > > terminate called after throwing an instance of=20 > > 'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException' > > /usr/local/bin/bash: line 1: 2019 Abort trap: 6 (core dumped) > > [ a whole lot of code (I'm copying by hand, so it is a bit=20 > > overwhelming) - involving clone/impress/sd/unxfbsd.pro, solver, and=20 > > qa_unit ] > > dmake: Error code 134, while making 'test' > > gb_LinkTarget_add_library_objects,CppunitTest/libtest_sc_ucalc.so,sc > > gb_LinkTarget_add_linktarget_objects,CppunitTest/libtest_sc_ucalc.so,Li= brary/libscfb.so=20 > > > > [ build all ] top level modules: sc > > [ build all ] loaded modules: sc > > [ build cut ] sc_ucalc > > Abort trap (core dumped) > > terminate called after throwing an instance of=20 > > 'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException' > > gmake[1]: ***=20 > > [/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-bootstrap-3.4.5.2/solv= er/340/unxfbsd.pro/workdir/CppunitTest/sc_ucalc.test]=20 > > Error 1 > > dmake: Error code 2, while making 'all' > > [ build all ] top level modules: sw > > [ build all ] loaded modules: sw > > [ build all ] loaded modules: sw > > [ build log ] sw > > sw deliver > > deliver -- version: 275594 > > Module 'sw' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 1 files unchanged > > > > ----------------------------------------------------- > > [ standard error message with webpage link to debug page ] > > > > internal build errors: > > > > ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making=20 > > /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-bootstrap-3.4.5.2/sd/qa= /unit > > ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making=20 > > /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-bootstrap-3.4.5.2/sc/prj > > > > [ instructions to build sd part of the build to isolate the issue ] > > > > As I mentioned I followed the directions and still hit the same error= =20 > > filed above (if more of the data is needed I guess I'll have to find a= =20 > > way to post it...). > > > > I'm on a deadline for this one, so I have to get this to work. How=20 > > should I further debug this to fix it? Or failing that (as an extreme= =20 > > last resort), will an older package already built work IF it is built= =20 > > for 8.2? > After a portsnap update I still get core dumps in the=20 > calc/sc/cppunittester and the impress/sd/qa/unit/cppunittester. >=20 > I've tried turning off make jobs, and I also checked the core files=20 > (when I finally found them). The only clue I have is this: >=20 > #0 0x00000008016bca7c in ?? >=20 > This is in _both_ core files, and although its not very helpful it says= =20 > its stopping in exactly the same place (duh). >=20 > Seriously guys, where do I go from here? Googling isn't exactly offering= =20 > up much - my searches can be as much as 7 results (usually my own stuff= =20 > or duplicates of the same). >=20 > Or, as my last resort, can I use the 8.2 package instead? >=20 > Need some serious pointers, pleeease... :) is you 9.0-RELEASE a freshly built system? or installed installed from installers or upgraded? regards, Bapt --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk91URsACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ex10ACfTMYjqX9ZdSSisGuNPbmfnC+0 CSUAoIakwb6ubpyQIqiDaPjxvVPok6Xw =cy3/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 07:04:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B426B1065670 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:04:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E418FC15 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47C2A5C22 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:17:35 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F755ADF.50106@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:03:59 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F71A789.3030502@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F73E0F5.6080304@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120330062219.GA49266@azathoth.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120330062219.GA49266@azathoth.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: libreoffice-3.4.5.2 failing to build X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:04:08 -0000 On 03/30/12 16:22, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 02:11:33PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: >> On 03/27/12 21:42, Da Rock wrote: >>> I've been hunting down some info on why this is failing, but all I >>> keep running into is the previous versions failings... :( >>> >>> I'm building libreoffice on 9.0-Release amd64, and I'm getting build >>> errors qa testing(?) sd. I followed the instructions, but it still >>> failed. It spits out this: >>> >>> scripting deliver >>> deliver -- version: 275594 >>> module 'scripting' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 28 files >>> unchanged >>> terminate called after throwing an instance of >>> 'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException' >>> /usr/local/bin/bash: line 1: 2019 Abort trap: 6 (core dumped) >>> [ a whole lot of code (I'm copying by hand, so it is a bit >>> overwhelming) - involving clone/impress/sd/unxfbsd.pro, solver, and >>> qa_unit ] >>> dmake: Error code 134, while making 'test' >>> gb_LinkTarget_add_library_objects,CppunitTest/libtest_sc_ucalc.so,sc >>> gb_LinkTarget_add_linktarget_objects,CppunitTest/libtest_sc_ucalc.so,Library/libscfb.so >>> >>> [ build all ] top level modules: sc >>> [ build all ] loaded modules: sc >>> [ build cut ] sc_ucalc >>> Abort trap (core dumped) >>> terminate called after throwing an instance of >>> 'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException' >>> gmake[1]: *** >>> [/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-bootstrap-3.4.5.2/solver/340/unxfbsd.pro/workdir/CppunitTest/sc_ucalc.test] >>> Error 1 >>> dmake: Error code 2, while making 'all' >>> [ build all ] top level modules: sw >>> [ build all ] loaded modules: sw >>> [ build all ] loaded modules: sw >>> [ build log ] sw >>> sw deliver >>> deliver -- version: 275594 >>> Module 'sw' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 1 files unchanged >>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------- >>> [ standard error message with webpage link to debug page ] >>> >>> internal build errors: >>> >>> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making >>> /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-bootstrap-3.4.5.2/sd/qa/unit >>> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making >>> /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-bootstrap-3.4.5.2/sc/prj >>> >>> [ instructions to build sd part of the build to isolate the issue ] >>> >>> As I mentioned I followed the directions and still hit the same error >>> filed above (if more of the data is needed I guess I'll have to find a >>> way to post it...). >>> >>> I'm on a deadline for this one, so I have to get this to work. How >>> should I further debug this to fix it? Or failing that (as an extreme >>> last resort), will an older package already built work IF it is built >>> for 8.2? >> After a portsnap update I still get core dumps in the >> calc/sc/cppunittester and the impress/sd/qa/unit/cppunittester. >> >> I've tried turning off make jobs, and I also checked the core files >> (when I finally found them). The only clue I have is this: >> >> #0 0x00000008016bca7c in ?? >> >> This is in _both_ core files, and although its not very helpful it says >> its stopping in exactly the same place (duh). >> >> Seriously guys, where do I go from here? Googling isn't exactly offering >> up much - my searches can be as much as 7 results (usually my own stuff >> or duplicates of the same). >> >> Or, as my last resort, can I use the 8.2 package instead? >> >> Need some serious pointers, pleeease... :) > is you 9.0-RELEASE a freshly built system? or installed installed from > installers or upgraded? Completely clean install last week, and ports tree refreshed since on wed. I've been on the libreoffice-dev lists and the only advice is to disable the tests - but if the test is failing it must be for a reason don't you think? So why? Thanks for these couple of responses, still need help though :) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 07:36:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (pointyhat.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::2b]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C78106564A for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:36:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@freebsd.org) Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2U7aShq071043 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:36:28 GMT (envelope-from erwin@pointyhat.freebsd.org) Received: (from erwin@localhost) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id q2U7aS20071017 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:36:28 GMT (envelope-from erwin) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:36:28 GMT From: Erwin Lansing Message-Id: <201203300736.q2U7aS20071017@pointyhat.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: INDEX build failed for 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:36:29 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: lazarus-0.9.30 Committers on the hook: scheidell wen Most recent CVS update was: U editors/Makefile U editors/lazarus-gtk2/Makefile U editors/lazarus-gtk2/pkg-descr U textproc/p5-ODF-lpOD/Makefile U textproc/p5-ODF-lpOD/distinfo U www/mediawiki/Makefile U www/mediawiki/distinfo U www/py-pywebdav/Makefile U www/py-pywebdav/distinfo U www/py-pywebdav/pkg-plist U www/py-routes/Makefile U www/py-routes/distinfo U www/py-routes/pkg-plist From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 07:57:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B49B106564A; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:57:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kayasaman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f42.google.com (mail-qa0-f42.google.com [209.85.216.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5CCA8FC17; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:57:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qafi31 with SMTP id i31so289553qaf.15 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:57:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nw2YvtzujbqlC0Jo9zw6zZVG0NRngEWWVaFOTMgLSZg=; b=0mC/HLkUNwy9RvIGPT1dj1FXcoJBcbF8oOfGeqa5//cXR6xEIhbScsRVxegQLNzCOe lY0icjACRH+UH0AgP+8iuazzt4w/fimP4DKb4IkL+6qm1aApAPqoGTiPZZNr2+7u9oYl sNbz62cuKHiZEs/y8yUeUXoNINNKEvg9vjE8H9iFesRpUq/GMR2H8e7Rj9EgzAbjpZAt 4HWpnt560ylpd9AC8Az27diAfWMV5H3+SqAHvGYecHrNaOMF9zyk5kpeeIR8/zlAQtU5 xnONt3I3C7HC71o+4AEGxg8gyinMb193bKmNWlaT6g14HZixstP2G0DW+wgFotIM3UK+ YODA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.33.134 with SMTP id h6mr4252055qad.15.1333094274022; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:57:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.187.130 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:57:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F74800E.6070503@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F74800E.6070503@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:57:53 +0100 Message-ID: From: Kaya Saman To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jabberd port doesn't come with any certificates and is not allowing authorization? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:57:55 -0000 On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote= : > On 29/03/2012 15:45, Kaya Saman wrote: >> I've recently built the jabberd port and upgraded to the latest version:= 2.x > > Actually jabberd2 (net-im/jabberd) is a completely different different > project to jabberd14 (net-im/jabber) -- it's not "upgrading" so much as > switching to a different piece of software. > > In any case, jabberd2 is the correct choice: it is being actively > developed and is keeping abreast of the various XMPP extensions that are > being published. Ok so I'm on the right track then :-) > >> I'm having major problems in configuring it though and was wondering >> if someone could either give me a hand or help me generate >> certificates for it which are mentioned in the config file but not >> within the /usr/local/etc/jabberd directory. >> >> >> I'm experiencing this issue: >> >> Mar 29 16:33:48 JABBER jabberd/c2s[1498]: [8] [10.0.0.10, port=3D59032] = connect >> Mar 29 16:33:48 JABBER jabberd/c2s[1498]: [8] got pre STARTTLS packet, d= ropping >> Mar 29 16:33:48 JABBER jabberd/c2s[1498]: [8] [10.0.0.10, port=3D59032] >> disconnect jid=3Dunbound, packets: 1 > > Your client is attempting to switch its connection to using TLS. =A0This > is good, especially if you are using a SASL method of LOGIN or PASSWORD > -- otherwise it would send passwords across the net in plain test. Hmm... so I guess pidgin doesn't do non-encrypted connections then? I totally agree with using encryption however, I just want to learn how to setup jabberd first in its most basic state before getting more advanced. > >> This is my realm information: >> >> >> =A0 =A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 pemfile=3D'/usr/local/etc/jabberd/server.pem' >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 verify-mode=3D'0' >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 cachain=3D'/usr/local/etc/jabberd/client_ca_certs.pem' >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 require-starttls=3D'false' >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 register-enable=3D'true' >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 instructions=3D'Enter a username and password to registe= r with >> this server.' >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 register-oob=3D'http://srv.jabber.com/register' >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 password-change=3D'true' >> =A0 =A0 >jabber.com >> =A0 =A0 >> >> >> jabber.com may publicly exist however, this is a trial done in Vbox >> and totally offline just so I can understand the necessary mechanisms >> involved as to learn how the jabberd server functions! > > You've got both 'register-enable' and 'register-oob' -- you probably > don't want both of those, unless you do have an out-of-band method to > create user accounts. Actually to allow IM clients to register will be better, though later on when I do a full implementation I will need to authenticate to either PAM or AD. > > Presumably you have created the required server x509 certificate. =A0If > you're doing it on the cheap, that means a self-signed certificate. =A0In > which case there simply won't be a cain of CA certs to worry about. =A0I'= d > also recommend require-starttls=3D'true' I don't have an x509 cert, I discovered this though: http://www.stanbarber.com/freebsd/creating-self-signed-ssl-certificates-on-= freebsd-with-openssl Is that what you mean or is the x509 different from the SSL self signed cer= t? > > Of course, there's a lot more to setting up jabberd than just this > little section of one of the config files. Means a lot more to learn.... > >> I'm using Pidgin as the IM client who is configured like: >> >> Username: user >> Domain: jabber.com >> Password: >> Local Alias: user_alias >> Use encrypted connections if available =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <<<---*** >> Allow plaintext auth over unencrypted streams =A0<<<---*** >> Connect server: srv.jabber.com > > Those two marked items are not a good idea. =A0If you're using login to > authenticate the SASL libraries expect you to use TLS to secure the > transaction, and the way of least resistance is to do so. Once cert has been created I will adjust accordingly! > >> On the client I keep getting: "Policy Violation" error. >> >> >> It's really weird but there seems to be a lack of documentation as I >> managed to find the stuff for jabberd version 1.4, for version 2.x >> I've followed some URL's: >> >> http://www.jms1.net/jabberd2/ >> >> http://www.indiangnu.org/2009/how-to-configure-jabber-jabberd2-with-mysq= lpam-as-auth-database/ >> >> http://bionicraptor.co/2011/07/25/how-to-encrypt-jabberd2-communications= / >> >> http://bionicraptor.co/2011/05/20/how-to-install-and-configure-japperd2-= with-mysql/ >> >> >> But still nothing is working, I believe it's to do with the security >> as in using encrypted or unencrypted connections but I can't be >> certain... there doesn't seem to be any mysql DB creation script >> either that I could find?? > > Look in /usr/local/share/doc/jabberd > > I originally implemented jabberd2 using a MySQL database, but have > switched to PostgreSQL. =A0Which RDBMs you use won't make a whole lot of > difference unless your traffic levels grow to pretty enormous levels. > In fact, for a lightly used system, sqlite would be a reasonable choice. > >> Is there a fix or am I stuck?? > > Well, I have jabberd2 up and running quite happily. =A0I don't remember > setting it up as being particularly traumatic. =A0I just read the docco, > followed the install guide here: > https://github.com/Jabberd2/jabberd2/wiki/InstallGuide =A0(which is linke= d > to from the jabberd2 home page at http://jabberd2.xiaoka.com/) and the > comments in the sample .xml files and it all worked fine after the usual > sort of testing and debugging. Ok will check it out....... and hopefully understand more on jabberd rather then going blind :-) > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Cheers, > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Matthew > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey > > Regards, Kaya From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 08:11:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3251A106564A for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:11:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward15.mail.yandex.net (forward15.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DBE8FC0A for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:11:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (smtp12.mail.yandex.net [95.108.131.191]) by forward15.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 4290C9E2948 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:11:55 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1333095115; bh=1A+VoHMGaB0XBcWPuClQNlDv5Em1CrnDD8hFpzyfMuE=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=DIYvP6EXqzuEvqeDwAJPmsy4ceMSm3WXGZu1j0fp6soR0a+F8ct2GOisaWprL1mjT kcjOX++R1c93ffKjRn2GdTqxarGAt/3SnFBVMAGCsUSjZ0nkvliajiWmdf+eVHvvBZ HFM1X2IyfwgtKvn5TtGgbJyWFGNVEumNuIf2pZYo= Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 2555E16A0554 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:11:55 +0400 (MSK) Received: from unknown (unknown [213.27.65.65]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id Bs1ixfIT-Bs1WZ22T; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:11:54 +0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1333095115; bh=1A+VoHMGaB0XBcWPuClQNlDv5Em1CrnDD8hFpzyfMuE=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=LPTnhu4eW+4Q4/AwANuHaRoZMQf0ZvfRTfb3qAL7DgOh3hYfRgNFkAq6NQTHCKBTL hD2cOVnWnGF81ZFWsDrItwNKk62bEOCaRPB07ZPnnVEmZ6VryF70eKio4hBNai7Aro v/Jn4kzA2VY/unZxWeYcVUJuf4uSLMa8H1PijTQU= Message-ID: <4F756AB4.5040705@yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:11:32 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Can please with anybody sparc64 try to build devel/py-pylib? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:11:57 -0000 Subj. This port is marked IGNORE on sparc64 for a long time, and I suspect that it's no more valid. Can please anybody with sparc64 provide me with a buildlog of devel/py-pylib (with IGNORE line removed). Thanks in advance. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 09:12:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3670D1065672; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:12:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40018FC0A; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:12:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2U9CjGd019040; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:12:45 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2U9Cj53019039; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:12:45 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:12:42 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: ports@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20120330091241.GC49266@azathoth.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HG+GLK89HZ1zG0kk" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Subject: [HEADSUP] pkgng 1.0-beta9 please test X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:12:46 -0000 --HG+GLK89HZ1zG0kk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi, On behalf of pkgng crew, I'm happy to announce pkg 1.0-beta9 - changes: * query -f has been replaced by query -F when querying a package (file) for consistency with pkg info * fix autoremove recursion * pkg set -o oldorigin:neworigin allow the user to modify the origin of a packages (useful for MOVED) * several fixes on powerpc * pkg query evaluation expression now accept != * pkg2ng is now able to migrate a local database without needed the ports tree * speed up pkg check by only loading the informations needed for the operation it will do * code cleanup in the library * fix uname/gname lookup when creating packages * new periodic script for pkg audit * new keyword shlib, pkgng is able to load information about the needed shlibs for a package (disable by default) * pkg info act as pkg info -a by default * new install timestamp in the package database, available using pkg query "%t" * pkg updating can now take a port name as argument to only show related UPDATING informations) * -q (quiet) for install, delete, upgrade, update and autoremove * new ABI detection string Concerning the new ABI, to be able to determine which package can be installed on which destination, pkgng couldn't rely on the simple: os version/machine, because some arches have incompatible ABIs. Can compute on its own the ABI, the string is the followin: OSNAME:OSMAJORVERSION:OSARCH:OSCLASS(:...) .. means the arch specific extensions. which means on: * amd64: freebsd:9:x86:64 * i386: freebsd:9:x86 * arm: freebsd:9:arm:eb:oabi:softvp etc Be careful all the packages (.txz) files have to be rebuilt!!! When binary upgradeing from pkg beta8, on amd64 do the following: UNAME_m=freebsd:9:x86:64 pkg install -f pkg on i386 UNAME_m=freebsd:9:x86:32 pkg install -f pkg Bonus when run on a chroot/jail where ABI is different from the host, pkgng will dynamically determine the destination ABI. Please note that normally this will be the last beta version, regards, Bapt --HG+GLK89HZ1zG0kk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk91eQkACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwqawCff6+9uH+gRqAIvVFZIZPfjid8 Vk4AnipLRFcWtcNcWdF0KmnrGAFWa3J0 =fqh0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HG+GLK89HZ1zG0kk-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 09:16:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B670106564A for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:16:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083358FC1B for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:16:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7096F621C36 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:16:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFA41621C2D for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:16:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from MikeBook-Air.local (10.80.0.4) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:16:18 -0400 Message-ID: <4F7579E7.9020704@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:16:23 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <4F756AB4.5040705@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <4F756AB4.5040705@yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Can please with anybody sparc64 try to build devel/py-pylib? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:16:20 -0000 On 3/30/12 4:11 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > > Subj. > > This port is marked IGNORE on sparc64 for a long time, and I suspect > that it's no more valid. Can please anybody with sparc64 provide me > with a buildlog of devel/py-pylib (with IGNORE line removed). Thanks > in advance. I have a 6.4 box, that do any good? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 09:43:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E169106564A; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:43:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C6B8FC0C; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:43:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1SDYMz-000053-4a>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:43:45 +0200 Received: from telesto.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.198]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1SDYMz-0003kp-0K>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:43:45 +0200 Message-ID: <4F75804B.6000907@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:43:39 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Current FreeBSD , Ports FreeBSD X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig4BC4816D3FF31323F78D2886" X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.198 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 and SSL connections to PostgreSQL 9.1.3: broken! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:43:46 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4BC4816D3FF31323F78D2886 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A couple of days ago I updated FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT and deleted old libs and old files via "make delete-old-XXX" in /usr/src, as I saw that Kerberos5/Heimdal got an update. After that, several server/applications didn't work correctly anymore due to missing, already deleted libraries. So i recompiled nearly every port, especially Subversion, OpenLDAP (amongst Cyrus SASL, pam_ldap and nss_ldap). PostgreSQL has also got an update from 9.1.2 to 9.1.3 that time. My hurting problem is, that ALL FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT based servers using OpenLDAP or SSL connections now fail. I can not exactly nail down the problem, but these (already completely with portmaster -f recompiled applications) ports fail connecting to PostgreSQL when using OpenLDAP/SSL= : pgadmin3 (users in pg_hba are, except superuser, on OpenLDAP) refdb (refdb users are OpenLDAP backed) Mediawiki (Mediawiki users are OpenLDAP backed) These ports connect to PostgreSQL and use for user's authentication OpenLDAP. Our boxes also use OpenLDAP for user authentication, this works, so I assume PostgreSQL is the failing point. In the log I get that a pg_hba entry with SSL off is missing. Somehow, SSL doesn't work anymore or the certificate got invalidated (created with a CA on FreeBSD 9, now used on FBSD 10). Does anyone also experience this weird behaviour? Regards, Oliver --------------enig4BC4816D3FF31323F78D2886 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPdYBQAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8COUH/3TeMzG1H7Szon+iVmH1XcuW KpvdIrfOFE1bJRhJ5UVkoJ8QvcDZRPr6lAI72cnDZ2PwZj892tO6jbh7NGBa+Z6I ilLYpchW0m04HuM9/Jx3RInImqHXHixbu9d5GKd7Wha1ue39YbDPGZ0AlnB0vZPS +ltydP+E/zvMImdvituRe376rxnPcQvX9fODlpyec0n1sLNHf+/hUqOHQTlPiWZO 3vy9sij5Oglz20YTLQ9oYyNpEZNDqwXWOI8FlLbqr6ODNtsYE+BwLShmKOlY11jz oYHZy5sEsoNRxCcLQCN6HKWeVT5oOa5+OLabUxgjHQb3/Km+0gBieyfvGL9VezM= =COKj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4BC4816D3FF31323F78D2886-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 09:44:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD729106567D; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:44:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527E88FC19; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsd.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.59] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SDYN5-0006QS-0a; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:43:57 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SDYMm-0002K9-KG; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:43:32 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2U9hWki017864; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:43:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2U9hWwx017863; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:43:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bris.ac.uk using -f Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:43:32 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Michael Scheidell Message-ID: <20120330094332.GA17827@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <4F756AB4.5040705@yandex.ru> <4F7579E7.9020704@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F7579E7.9020704@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can please with anybody sparc64 try to build devel/py-pylib? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:44:02 -0000 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 05:16:23AM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: > > > On 3/30/12 4:11 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > > > >Subj. > > > >This port is marked IGNORE on sparc64 for a long time, and I suspect > >that it's no more valid. Can please anybody with sparc64 provide me > >with a buildlog of devel/py-pylib (with IGNORE line removed). Thanks > >in advance. Seems fine on sparc64 r230787M: Script started on Fri Mar 30 10:37:50 2012 make install package ===> License MIT accepted by the user ===> Extracting for py27-pylib-1.4.7 => SHA256 Checksum OK for py-1.4.7.zip. ===> py27-pylib-1.4.7 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/unzip - found ===> Patching for py27-pylib-1.4.7 ===> py27-pylib-1.4.7 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/easy_install-2.7 - found ===> py27-pylib-1.4.7 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found ===> Configuring for py27-pylib-1.4.7 running config ===> Building for py27-pylib-1.4.7 running bdist_egg running egg_info writing py.egg-info/PKG-INFO writing top-level names to py.egg-info/top_level.txt writing dependency_links to py.egg-info/dependency_links.txt reading manifest file 'py.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' reading manifest template 'MANIFEST.in' writing manifest file 'py.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' installing library code to build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg running install_lib running build_py creating build creating build/lib creating build/lib/py copying py/__init__.py -> build/lib/py copying py/__metainfo.py -> build/lib/py copying py/_apipkg.py -> build/lib/py copying py/_builtin.py -> build/lib/py copying py/_error.py -> build/lib/py copying py/_iniconfig.py -> build/lib/py copying py/_std.py -> build/lib/py copying py/_xmlgen.py -> build/lib/py copying py/test.py -> build/lib/py creating build/lib/py/_code copying py/_code/__init__.py -> build/lib/py/_code copying py/_code/_assertionnew.py -> build/lib/py/_code copying py/_code/_assertionold.py -> build/lib/py/_code copying py/_code/assertion.py -> build/lib/py/_code copying py/_code/code.py -> build/lib/py/_code copying py/_code/source.py -> build/lib/py/_code creating build/lib/py/_io copying py/_io/__init__.py -> build/lib/py/_io copying py/_io/capture.py -> build/lib/py/_io copying py/_io/saferepr.py -> build/lib/py/_io copying py/_io/terminalwriter.py -> build/lib/py/_io creating build/lib/py/_log copying py/_log/__init__.py -> build/lib/py/_log copying py/_log/log.py -> build/lib/py/_log copying py/_log/warning.py -> build/lib/py/_log creating build/lib/py/_path copying py/_path/__init__.py -> build/lib/py/_path copying py/_path/cacheutil.py -> build/lib/py/_path copying py/_path/common.py -> build/lib/py/_path copying py/_path/local.py -> build/lib/py/_path copying py/_path/svnurl.py -> build/lib/py/_path copying py/_path/svnwc.py -> build/lib/py/_path creating build/lib/py/_process copying py/_process/__init__.py -> build/lib/py/_process copying py/_process/cmdexec.py -> build/lib/py/_process copying py/_process/forkedfunc.py -> build/lib/py/_process copying py/_process/killproc.py -> build/lib/py/_process creating build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64 creating build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg creating build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py copying build/lib/py/__init__.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py copying build/lib/py/__metainfo.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py copying build/lib/py/_apipkg.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py copying build/lib/py/_builtin.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py copying build/lib/py/_error.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py copying build/lib/py/_iniconfig.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py copying build/lib/py/_std.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py copying build/lib/py/_xmlgen.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py copying build/lib/py/test.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py creating build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_code copying build/lib/py/_code/__init__.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_code copying build/lib/py/_code/_assertionnew.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_code copying build/lib/py/_code/_assertionold.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_code copying build/lib/py/_code/assertion.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_code copying build/lib/py/_code/code.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_code copying build/lib/py/_code/source.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_code creating build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_io copying build/lib/py/_io/__init__.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_io copying build/lib/py/_io/capture.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_io copying build/lib/py/_io/saferepr.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_io copying build/lib/py/_io/terminalwriter.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_io creating build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_log copying build/lib/py/_log/__init__.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_log copying build/lib/py/_log/log.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_log copying build/lib/py/_log/warning.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_log creating build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_path copying build/lib/py/_path/__init__.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_path copying build/lib/py/_path/cacheutil.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_path copying build/lib/py/_path/common.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_path copying build/lib/py/_path/local.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_path copying build/lib/py/_path/svnurl.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_path copying build/lib/py/_path/svnwc.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_path creating build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_process copying build/lib/py/_process/__init__.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_process copying build/lib/py/_process/cmdexec.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_process copying build/lib/py/_process/forkedfunc.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_process copying build/lib/py/_process/killproc.py -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_process byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/__init__.py to __init__.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/__metainfo.py to __metainfo.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_apipkg.py to _apipkg.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_builtin.py to _builtin.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_error.py to _error.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_iniconfig.py to _iniconfig.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_std.py to _std.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_xmlgen.py to _xmlgen.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/test.py to test.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_code/__init__.py to __init__.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_code/_assertionnew.py to _assertionnew.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_code/_assertionold.py to _assertionold.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_code/assertion.py to assertion.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_code/code.py to code.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_code/source.py to source.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_io/__init__.py to __init__.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_io/capture.py to capture.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_io/saferepr.py to saferepr.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_io/terminalwriter.py to terminalwriter.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_log/__init__.py to __init__.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_log/log.py to log.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_log/warning.py to warning.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_path/__init__.py to __init__.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_path/cacheutil.py to cacheutil.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_path/common.py to common.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_path/local.py to local.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_path/svnurl.py to svnurl.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_path/svnwc.py to svnwc.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_process/__init__.py to __init__.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_process/cmdexec.py to cmdexec.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_process/forkedfunc.py to forkedfunc.pyc byte-compiling build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/py/_process/killproc.py to killproc.pyc creating build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/EGG-INFO copying py.egg-info/PKG-INFO -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/EGG-INFO copying py.egg-info/SOURCES.txt -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/EGG-INFO copying py.egg-info/dependency_links.txt -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/EGG-INFO copying py.egg-info/not-zip-safe -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/EGG-INFO copying py.egg-info/top_level.txt -> build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg/EGG-INFO creating dist creating 'dist/py-1.4.7-py2.7.egg' and adding 'build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg' to it removing 'build/bdist.freebsd-9.9-CURRENT-sparc64/egg' (and everything under it) ===> Installing for py27-pylib-1.4.7 ===> py27-pylib-1.4.7 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/easy_install-2.7 - found ===> py27-pylib-1.4.7 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if devel/py-pylib already installed running easy_install Processing py-1.4.7-py2.7.egg creating /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/py-1.4.7-py2.7.egg Extracting py-1.4.7-py2.7.egg to /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages Adding py 1.4.7 to easy-install.pth file Installed /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/py-1.4.7-py2.7.egg install -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/ports/devel/py-pylib/work/py-1.4.7/CHANGELOG /usr/ports/devel/py-pylib/work/py-1.4.7/README.txt /usr/local/share/doc/py-pylib ===> Registering installation for py27-pylib-1.4.7 ===> Building package for py27-pylib-1.4.7 Script done on Fri Mar 30 10:38:06 2012 -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 09:47:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8871065675 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:47:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A428FC15 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2U9lIMi020119 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:47:19 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q2U9lIMi020119 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q2U9lIMi020119; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none Message-ID: <4F75811F.40205@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:47:11 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kaya Saman References: <4F74800E.6070503@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig00BE997E109F5A863875B737" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: jabberd port doesn't come with any certificates and is not allowing authorization? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:47:24 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig00BE997E109F5A863875B737 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 30/03/2012 08:57, Kaya Saman wrote: >> You've got both 'register-enable' and 'register-oob' -- you probably >> > don't want both of those, unless you do have an out-of-band method t= o >> > create user accounts. > Actually to allow IM clients to register will be better, though later > on when I do a full implementation I will need to authenticate to > either PAM or AD. The point was that 'register-enable' turns on jabberd's internal account creation functions, whereas 'register-oob' says to go to a separate site in order to create the account. If you're using a user database from elsewhere (pam or AD for instance), then you'ld want neither of those options. >> > Presumably you have created the required server x509 certificate. I= f >> > you're doing it on the cheap, that means a self-signed certificate. = In >> > which case there simply won't be a cain of CA certs to worry about. = I'd >> > also recommend require-starttls=3D'true' > I don't have an x509 cert, I discovered this though: >=20 > http://www.stanbarber.com/freebsd/creating-self-signed-ssl-certificates= -on-freebsd-with-openssl >=20 > Is that what you mean or is the x509 different from the SSL self signed= cert? Hmmm... actually that article describes setting up your own Certification Authority. You certainly can do that if you want to -- but I'd recommend using security/tinyca rather than the fairly rudimentary setup using little more than what comes with openssl described above. A self-signed certificate is actually a bit different to what the above would get you. They're both x509 certificates (where x509 means it just adheres to a standard format published by the International Telecomunications Union) -- a "certificate" in cryptography-speak is simply a public key plus some other data describing how it is used, which has been digitally signed to prevent tampering. "self-signed" means that the /private/ key used to sign the certificate is the counterpart to the /public/ key contained in it. You can tell from a self-signed certificate that it hasn't been tampered with, but you have no prima-facie way of telling who the certificate belongs to and whether you should place any trust in it. So this sort of certificate is generally only useful for low value situations or within a small organization where you already know the people behind whatever it is that uses the certificate. Now, all normal certificates are actually self-signed. The difference is that a cert you would buy from a recognised CA is also signed by the CA's private key. This is a way of saying that the certification authority has gone through the due diligence of establishing that you are in fact who you say you are and that by signing the certificate they will vouch for you to third parties[*]. By setting up your own CA you can reliably identify certificates you issued yourself. That's all fine and dandy, but probably over the top for a throwaway key used in development and almost certainly not good enough for a service open to the general public. Anyhow, enough of this essay on public key cryptography. To create a self-signed certificate: 1) Create a new public/private key pair. openssl genrsa -out foo.key 1024 (note: this creates the key *without* a passphrase, which is what you usually want for services like jabber. Since it has no passphrase, it is particularly vulnerable to being stolen, so take care to keep it safe.) 2) Create a 'Certificate Signing Request' -- this is where you enter all the auxiliary data about what the key should be used for. openssl req -new -key foo.key -out foo.csr You'll be prompted for various identifying data. Fill them in as far as you can be bothered -- the only really important one is the 'Common Name' which should be the FQDN of your jabber server. You don't need to fill in 'Email Address' -- that's really only necessary for a certificate used for authentication by a person. Nor do you need to bother with any 'Challenge Password' or optional company name -- those can be used by some CAs as part of their authentication procedures. 3) Sign the public key (part of the contents of the CSR) with its own private key to generate the certificate openssl x509 -req -days 365 -in foo.csr -signkey foo.key -out foo.crt Adjust '-days 365' to taste, as you'll need to repeat this signing step to renew the cert once that period of validity has passed. 4) Specifically for jabberd2, concatenate the key and cert into one file: cat foo.key foo.crt > foo.pem This is an application specific thing: some apps like key and cert together like this, others use separate files for key and cert. Cheers, Matthew [*] Which just begs the question of "who is this CA and why should I trust them to vouch for anyone else?" Well, there's a hierarchy of certification authorities. The CA can itself issue a certificate for its certificate-signing key that is itself signed by some higher CA saying that they are fit and proper people to take that role. And so on, ad nauseam. Eventually you get to the top level, so called 'root' CAs, which are presumed to be so well known by everyone that you can just trust them without further quibble. (Yeah, right.) --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig00BE997E109F5A863875B737 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk91gSYACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwMkwCZARJ6rjdsZdOOaFUMbL3GE5Uu X3UAoJQVKeUCNi0ohpjePANMDQZ+hv34 =f0RG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig00BE997E109F5A863875B737-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 09:52:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4B2106566C; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:52:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward12.mail.yandex.net (forward12.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02818FC16; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:52:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp13.mail.yandex.net (smtp13.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.68]) by forward12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 4F998C211B3; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:52:53 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1333101173; bh=cIGOAWYXSxWN/QEPQiD3fjW/CofafjPw8c3rUlpH0qg=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=KJFAAxWWMiAXntJIUvWDErdfvVa5f9i4aQ93TbS9orlYHaSxv3OAwOVXhZI6icfJy r992llUuzLspueSOpzC9vbs6K44q4BognK4Wpuqv9VDKdaoBowGhmBadFbMVKjmMDt Q+kFpjv5HzKsBEcCSW4mBRExfqNtbUWIpBc1SSvM= Received: from smtp13.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp13.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 21F17E40482; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:52:53 +0400 (MSK) Received: from unknown (unknown [213.27.65.65]) by smtp13.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id qpBujMGJ-qqBuaYau; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:52:52 +0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1333101173; bh=cIGOAWYXSxWN/QEPQiD3fjW/CofafjPw8c3rUlpH0qg=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=QY4D2o+GwHgSg7bi0oCwdYMah4jfNdca4B4OWCCSLwlpSqP46ApUoirepS7QMH/E8 s6/wRDAE1r1MDyB7yJsK1oMvZpruyldQ2/2LRkPffkXYrNYzMYYkIuSAVNH4lbhvXD hfwKCfKIB2dP0YaRTZBwwLCd1uCUoosAxwhnaP6k= Message-ID: <4F75825D.6080600@yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:52:29 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anton Shterenlikht References: <4F756AB4.5040705@yandex.ru> <4F7579E7.9020704@FreeBSD.org> <20120330094332.GA17827@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20120330094332.GA17827@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Michael Scheidell , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can please anybody with sparc64 try to build devel/py-pylib? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:52:55 -0000 Anton Shterenlikht wrote on 30.03.2012 13:43: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 05:16:23AM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: >> >> >> On 3/30/12 4:11 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: >>> >>> Subj. >>> >>> This port is marked IGNORE on sparc64 for a long time, and I suspect >>> that it's no more valid. Can please anybody with sparc64 provide me >>> with a buildlog of devel/py-pylib (with IGNORE line removed). Thanks >>> in advance. > > Seems fine on sparc64 r230787M: Ok, thanks a bunch, Anton! Michael, thanks you, I seems got all I need already. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 10:09:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CB6106564A for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:09:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96D28FC0C for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505B5621C36 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:09:54 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABB58621C2D for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:09:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from MikeBook-Air.local (10.80.0.4) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:09:53 -0400 Message-ID: <4F758674.2040704@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:09:56 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <201203300736.q2U7aS20071017@pointyhat.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201203300736.q2U7aS20071017@pointyhat.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: INDEX build failed for 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:09:55 -0000 On 3/30/12 3:36 AM, Erwin Lansing wrote: > INDEX build failed with errors: > Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: lazarus-0.9.30 > > Committers on the hook: > scheidell wen mine. new port / lazarus-gtk2 slave port of lazarus. Worse yet, installs binary in same place as lazarus. Adding in CONFLICTS and fixes now. (but its 6am, need my first coffee.. haven't figured out how to fix this and the lazarus-qt4 slave port. I ASSUME I can 'maintainer (implicit) add a CONFLICTS to lazurus/Makefile? last pr timed out? or should I request that last committer do it? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 10:27:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C39106566B; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:27:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward13.mail.yandex.net (forward13.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E2A8FC12; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp14.mail.yandex.net (smtp14.mail.yandex.net [95.108.131.192]) by forward13.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id F200E143D2E; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:13:17 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1333102398; bh=juufnJcmsvVPgYaTD5FT8q184hLXP1J2dQHrCDQ5smw=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=LGZP1FSQ1AewgdkjriCjPO8Gx5QsHPB/8yXf9C6BXSTrPZ/lJnucPozLO1N4p1aDd KcmlBnF+Mj10Lz03EiYDRSu7hVVWyKY8KVFkg0oxKr0mSdHtKD2vOBkLxzW+jdqjFR gm9UmyhUn+w5Ai2/IOYEyPwBFLT1ljzieyI+qkfs= Received: from smtp14.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp14.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id D2E421B6072C; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:13:17 +0400 (MSK) Received: from unknown (unknown [213.27.65.65]) by smtp14.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id DGF09fqI-DHFaeJGs; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:13:17 +0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1333102397; bh=juufnJcmsvVPgYaTD5FT8q184hLXP1J2dQHrCDQ5smw=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=RHbthtpV9wJ6N86Izf+iA2ypLOBeLjMt3IDY4rxLA48GXgC/cFoeOzUl7i5Kvyr6M ZbyHEBDbuUODUlVG7zaDgv6BDy+sekm7n9MczfMOEXe0U+GdE/xW7GaBObR9Puog9a A1LnOzS/pB9sa2GNismIzdDa2TvzDWlJYjCdhma0= Message-ID: <4F758726.4060601@yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:12:54 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Scheidell References: <201203300736.q2U7aS20071017@pointyhat.freebsd.org> <4F758674.2040704@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F758674.2040704@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INDEX build failed for 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:27:00 -0000 Michael Scheidell wrote on 30.03.2012 14:09: > > > On 3/30/12 3:36 AM, Erwin Lansing wrote: >> INDEX build failed with errors: >> Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. >> Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: lazarus-0.9.30 >> >> Committers on the hook: >> scheidell wen > mine. > > new port / lazarus-gtk2 slave port of lazarus. > Worse yet, installs binary in same place as lazarus. > Adding in CONFLICTS and fixes now. > (but its 6am, need my first coffee.. haven't figured out how to fix this > and the lazarus-qt4 slave port. > I ASSUME I can 'maintainer (implicit) add a CONFLICTS to lazurus/Makefile? > last pr timed out? or should I request that last committer do it? > I believe you do not need an approval to fix things you broke. :) -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 10:35:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37848106564A; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:35:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vmagerya@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E5D8FC12; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so461373bkc.13 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 03:35:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I65ok6jFgKTDgb0GPzibEXrIlb19fMcUwu2U9PfVGMk=; b=deWCRJ6NqYISbYD7J5saUT8hc/nsvRN9UHgE7XV/LQ6s726c3Um3TwQjpYNdlJFlZ6 ZiaS+miHqe0nxh6AGBxJe3/8hlIuHnFn5uHniZmUFY3cWdZ1djWDIDOV+MfUs4DgJfRf yzdByJ14DZa8b30XRJs6aEClRjjq4kRfbGaD/wDz5vsvrtliGGqdUQRMGIP1kZ5pcYNX hfDVaZ4hf+8RVEfAPaB/snpDAZIC7EdWEM4cBSFttyNYb7nN+NE00jRXzXnBpX4YjaMf lSv4hR8HuyQ4UiwsErE8CVvdTyFdMm9V2FXlf1FSOtuAcivXvmpk/BAQRW/JF6yimDiB qsXQ== Received: by 10.204.143.151 with SMTP id v23mr747615bku.63.1333103710145; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 03:35:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.29.1.142] (altimet-gw.cs2.dp.wnet.ua. [217.20.178.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v2sm19798672bki.7.2012.03.30.03.35.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 03:35:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F758C37.3050800@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:34:31 +0300 From: Vitaly Magerya User-Agent: Thunderbird MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <20120330091241.GC49266@azathoth.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120330091241.GC49266@azathoth.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkgng 1.0-beta9 please test X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:35:12 -0000 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > * pkg set -o oldorigin:neworigin allow the user to modify the origin of a > packages (useful for MOVED) Can such things be tracked automatically? I.e. will "pkg upgrade" upgrade moved packages? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 10:35:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (pointyhat.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::2b]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D241065687 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:35:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@freebsd.org) Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2UAZX7V090952 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:35:33 GMT (envelope-from erwin@pointyhat.freebsd.org) Received: (from erwin@localhost) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id q2UAZX3M090951 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:35:33 GMT (envelope-from erwin) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:35:33 GMT From: Erwin Lansing Message-Id: <201203301035.q2UAZX3M090951@pointyhat.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: INDEX build failed for 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:35:33 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: lazarus-0.9.30 Committers on the hook: bapt delphij pav scheidell wen Most recent CVS update was: U games/gnarr/Makefile U math/p5-Statistics-R/Makefile U math/p5-Statistics-R/distinfo U net/openldap24-server/Makefile U net/openldap24-server/files/slapd.sh.in U ports-mgmt/pkg/Makefile U ports-mgmt/pkg/distinfo U ports-mgmt/pkg/pkg-plist From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 10:41:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8521065673 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:41:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B548FC18 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5955CD23C03; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:41:17 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53AE2D23C01; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:41:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from MikeBook-Air.local (10.80.0.4) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:41:15 -0400 Message-ID: <4F758DCD.80801@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:41:17 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov References: <201203300736.q2U7aS20071017@pointyhat.freebsd.org> <4F758674.2040704@FreeBSD.org> <4F758726.4060601@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <4F758726.4060601@yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INDEX build failed for 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:41:18 -0000 On 3/30/12 6:12 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > I believe you do not need an approval to fix things you broke. :) figured as much, but I didn't 'break' the master port, I wasn't committer.. in theory, eadler did by not considering the CONFLICTS. (don't blame him, but I wish I had seen his commit, and wish he would have followed through and taken the slaves) but, on to this port. silly slaves insist on lazarus-0.9.30 as their version, and I am trying things like PKGPREFIX, and the like to try to get it to change the PORTVERSION/NAME/ index. how do I see what it would use as INDEX name? (its 6:30 am, sun isn't up, haven't made coffee yet, hello there in russia. on a side note, I remember how thrilling it was in '94 to get emails from people with .ru email addresses when working on *BSD code for QNX. it was nice to see that engineers could cooperate, even then politicians could not.) can we tell jokes in ports@? or do I need to put it in my sig? we joke that politicians has its root in two words. poly, meaning many, and ticks, meaning little blood sucking insects. So, politicians means many little blood sucking insects. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 11:04:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99BD71065670 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:04:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66CFB8FC16 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:04:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC2F621C2D for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:04:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 054C0621C29 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:04:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from MikeBook-Air.local (10.80.0.4) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:04:10 -0400 Message-ID: <4F75932C.4020002@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:04:12 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <201203300736.q2U7aS20071017@pointyhat.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201203300736.q2U7aS20071017@pointyhat.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: INDEX build failed for 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:04:12 -0000 On 3/30/12 3:36 AM, Erwin Lansing wrote: > INDEX build failed with errors: > Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: lazarus-0.9.30 > > Committers on the hook: > scheidell wen > > Most recent CVS update was: > U editors/Makefile > U editors/lazarus-gtk2/Makefile > U editors/lazarus-gtk2/pkg-descr I marked port BROKEN for now so INDEX builds. Will get with submitter on his proposed fixes. (Master port needs CONFLICTS added for this and lazarus-qt4 also) -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 11:08:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB65106564A; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:08:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward12.mail.yandex.net (forward12.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809BC8FC1D; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:08:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (smtp12.mail.yandex.net [95.108.131.191]) by forward12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 92014C22328; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:08:13 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1333105693; bh=y65ieJaKpaemHaPOuBIAxcSMAe/HFzfJn06JkL+vO2Y=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=D2ac/0njcUvnbnjp8pQVb+AeAj3RRdNdA8qd03mTodoUlw4hK4akxuOPiNZkNaY5m Vwybeqk3xqlgUjFODS6fxBCgPq7rT8iC6LCQ2Qy0sIyBGtN9sUbcyDm0aRdvYptQsC djrrq1F49ESbdXCgO72tbjuFd3Aw9uDESM34FVCI= Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 7202C16A031C; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:08:13 +0400 (MSK) Received: from unknown (unknown [213.27.65.65]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id 8C1iHJfk-8D1WVWc8; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:08:13 +0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1333105693; bh=y65ieJaKpaemHaPOuBIAxcSMAe/HFzfJn06JkL+vO2Y=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=YfF4Pm1u/0y2Y/SuGksRO/ly1ptmke+gRGI2lqnm1keDxehIiwtng/opeA5mo9xr9 hnKFtczXaUvJ+Zk81I4ST1akk8P0RI5hPewEkpP7kQQOwjotCansZ1QEZ91sOGxcpK T4D9P3zZahHcB5qYuU5pIsUYMYDP/iKUF0PReVLM= Message-ID: <4F759406.5000408@yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:07:50 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Scheidell References: <201203300736.q2U7aS20071017@pointyhat.freebsd.org> <4F758674.2040704@FreeBSD.org> <4F758726.4060601@yandex.ru> <4F758DCD.80801@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F758DCD.80801@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INDEX build failed for 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:08:15 -0000 Michael Scheidell wrote on 30.03.2012 14:41: > > > On 3/30/12 6:12 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: >> I believe you do not need an approval to fix things you broke. :) > figured as much, but I didn't 'break' the master port, I wasn't > committer.. in theory, eadler did by not considering the CONFLICTS. > (don't blame him, but I wish I had seen his commit, and wish he would > have followed through and taken the slaves) > > but, on to this port. > silly slaves insist on lazarus-0.9.30 as their version, and I am trying > things like PKGPREFIX, and the like to try to get it to change the > PORTVERSION/NAME/ index. > > how do I see what it would use as INDEX name? To be honest, I'm not sure how to do this correctly, since I didn't faced with the slave ports yet. But I'd check an existing ports tree for examples and asked more experienced committers on #bsdports. As I understand you always can check if all is ok with an INDEX with `make index`. > > (its 6:30 am, sun isn't up, haven't made coffee yet, hello there in > russia. on a side note, I remember how thrilling it was in '94 to get > emails from people with .ru email addresses when working on *BSD code > for QNX. it was nice to see that engineers could cooperate, even then > politicians could not.) > can we tell jokes in ports@? or do I need to put it in my sig? I believe there is nothing criminal when it's in context :). (this one not in the case) > > we joke that politicians has its root in two words. poly, meaning many, > and ticks, meaning little blood sucking insects. So, politicians means > many little blood sucking insects. Old, but good one. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 11:10:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3BC106566C; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:10:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05CD8FC0A; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:10:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14A96A605B; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:10:43 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.0x20.net Received: from mail.0x20.net ([217.69.76.211]) by mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AQyeLPkRZe0w; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:10:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C4D86A6053; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:10:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2UBAhR9058811; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:10:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q2UBAh6L058072; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:10:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:10:43 +0200 From: Lars Engels To: Baptiste Daroussin Message-ID: <20120330111043.GP88879@e-new.0x20.net> References: <20120330091241.GC49266@azathoth.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h9WqFG8zn/Mwlkpe" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120330091241.GC49266@azathoth.lan> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkgng 1.0-beta9 please test X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:10:45 -0000 --h9WqFG8zn/Mwlkpe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:12:42AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On behalf of pkgng crew, I'm happy to announce pkg 1.0-beta9 > [...] =20 > Please note that normally this will be the last beta version, So we can expect an official package repository with the first RC? --h9WqFG8zn/Mwlkpe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk91lLMACgkQKc512sD3afib0wCePSU4kVWuhzFzXPihFSPrctoI /9EAoKPGtQeo5pBlQVbENtNaWzTNC6Ts =ddcN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h9WqFG8zn/Mwlkpe-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 11:12:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892031065670; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:12:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlaffaye.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61A58FC1D; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaaf13 with SMTP id f13so150351eaa.13 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:12:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6ytwsfIY06W89nJytKW6Hl8ZB6mj7/5MfORoyzKEaYM=; b=FZq2nXSOdOT0KXcycgt6xPtptnEIduTLSKQPxCk8p0y/LzHn3j/kZI5UXV64Nn2/qP Www2/9zW/7CHoB1JpKemVjPDOHCsaT/LDGtfYsaxBv+cQsrQI6ifoYUz9t5q6jqJoUuN CSbD2ACfaYK4IERdQirxTkx0DywPNnQYPFj39IrAWBi4q3GkY98o73nq7P/iACLy79b/ OWGWZFmbyJo6xcVYDOSbcpPGHThoKCHnvlqIvsEeFEVmApjecO+feUMnbsybhZ80pyu/ o7mgV8ah1Tl1FH3kjqyumTmWNnCJCwxy93cqPkeOQWlzV+xFGAysN1O8Q6ze1RfwKo0S jpHA== Received: by 10.14.187.133 with SMTP id y5mr390517eem.73.1333105964725; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:12:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.42.116.106] (proxy.ovh.net. [213.186.50.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p57sm31689172eei.8.2012.03.30.04.12.43 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:12:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Julien Laffaye Message-ID: <4F75952A.80406@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:12:42 +0200 From: Julien Laffaye User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lars Engels References: <20120330091241.GC49266@azathoth.lan> <20120330111043.GP88879@e-new.0x20.net> In-Reply-To: <20120330111043.GP88879@e-new.0x20.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Baptiste Daroussin , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkgng 1.0-beta9 please test X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:12:52 -0000 On 03/30/2012 01:10 PM, Lars Engels wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:12:42AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On behalf of pkgng crew, I'm happy to announce pkg 1.0-beta9 >> > [...] > >> Please note that normally this will be the last beta version, > So we can expect an official package repository with the first RC? A public repo, maybe. An official repo endorsed by portmgr that's another story... :) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 11:17:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C58106566B for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:17:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E238E8FC0C for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:17:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3BF621C36 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:17:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E33E4621C2D for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:17:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from MikeBook-Air.local (10.80.0.4) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:17:48 -0400 Message-ID: <4F75965D.90908@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:17:49 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <20120329234406.GA23602@rwpc13.mby.riverwillow.net.au> In-Reply-To: <20120329234406.GA23602@rwpc13.mby.riverwillow.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: databases/mysql55-client 5.5.22 fails to build on i386 WITH_OPENSSL X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:17:50 -0000 On 3/29/12 7:44 PM, John Marshall wrote: > Attempts to build this port on i386 with WITH_OPENSSL (the default > option) fail for me. I have tried four systems: 2 x 8.3-RC2 and 2 x > 9.0-RELEASE. I don't have a 64-bit system available for test. All > builds stop at the same place. Builds succeed on all systems if I set > WITHOUT_OPENSSL. I could never get it to work, and google shows lots of issues. Also shows suggestions to NOT include ssl (yassl) in mysql itself, but wrap it in stunnel (for performance reasons) -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 11:48:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BC2106566C; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:48:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7BB8FC17; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:48:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so530446bkc.13 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:48:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=DustOI5QvZ2llg+hqtA6JiPeYBvQ8eB1uuJaaUyIxhQ=; b=OEucEKMB3sa/X6IHW0llt/60DBIJyrnLXI4IBCrP0sVR5apuIUybq4GG+sLY4A7lGw TIsmayAgXmFTaO7CF+U/rUR/xmBklj7E3GKdfjJrjyE42FRrO8VXQqlD/FQZWQMJIsTG LZU4/N65BVnehKp9VRMn9DuOGGu/PvhOftFnEuj/mgzJk+9nQ23QtLJn7wCma2897Bsi bNOcP0QzX0cciaNOT29xR2ukk7B9jHido7xC+YycmdKsUc50MJAZePmnLakCR8k2mU0A qKTaz6OzRthMkKCqBzMF12A12SMKuJyv2/I+qp7yeHEsPd4tKfjBZyi8c5Ku0YErIfw7 j6VQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.117.15 with SMTP id fk15mr793986bkc.133.1333108090039; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:48:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:48:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:48:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F75932C.4020002@FreeBSD.org> References: <201203300736.q2U7aS20071017@pointyhat.freebsd.org> <4F75932C.4020002@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:48:09 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Michael Scheidell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INDEX build failed for 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:48:12 -0000 On 30 Mar 2012 12:04, "Michael Scheidell" wrote: > > > > On 3/30/12 3:36 AM, Erwin Lansing wrote: >> >> INDEX build failed with errors: >> Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. >> Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: lazarus-0.9.30 >> >> Committers on the hook: >> scheidell wen >> >> Most recent CVS update was: >> U editors/Makefile >> U editors/lazarus-gtk2/Makefile >> U editors/lazarus-gtk2/pkg-descr > > I marked port BROKEN for now so INDEX builds. Will get with submitter on his proposed fixes. > (Master port needs CONFLICTS added for this and lazarus-qt4 also) BROKEN won't fix index build-- you need to remove the line from the category Makefile; "disconnecting it from the build". Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 12:06:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A31106566C; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:06:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kayasaman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7154B8FC16; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:06:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so359764qcs.13 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:06:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+sDFA7oFYCrZv2sX8wPe1JmnW3QOmvHmyMmb02hsIhE=; b=Se1TtquIAtu1YxrilhgsC3V6Jl+Kx5H/Spe0/FPNw5LsvAr18KhVoHrkWV2f8rt3B0 ThvCpOvZinSAMbEimOVeUoJfQPVVe4xzPoEreOB9HZkQ5x/ehmo78QJpy30LvEdjFRn6 gBARuxJa242u+b/AWEnGvG3k7E3TKhglUF4a46Fhf6FNZKZQkxUdtx896XSNKOfOPHVX 0JwhjJpevlUFAZ5ta3dBxtDQqr9ZsRlZcOcyCZoTVcgy/poMHI2zNvLMuo6v0j80sLZq tDU+3c5yMX5e7vihTSjmdP4/j/vytXO87YsCDsasSXxqFjMhHSm68P8bfOq5hzrInBn2 yjcg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.33.134 with SMTP id h6mr5087762qad.15.1333109175438; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:06:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.187.130 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:06:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F75811F.40205@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F74800E.6070503@FreeBSD.org> <4F75811F.40205@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:06:15 +0100 Message-ID: From: Kaya Saman To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jabberd port doesn't come with any certificates and is not allowing authorization? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:06:16 -0000 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Matthew Seaman wrot= e: > On 30/03/2012 08:57, Kaya Saman wrote: >>> You've got both 'register-enable' and 'register-oob' -- you probably >>> > don't want both of those, unless you do have an out-of-band method to >>> > create user accounts. > >> Actually to allow IM clients to register will be better, though later >> on when I do a full implementation I will need to authenticate to >> either PAM or AD. > > The point was that 'register-enable' turns on jabberd's internal account > creation functions, whereas 'register-oob' says to go to a separate site > in order to create the account. > > If you're using a user database from elsewhere (pam or AD for instance), > then you'ld want neither of those options. That is for the future though, let me just get the base working in order to understand what I'm doing then I'll look at further options for authentication later. :-) > > =A0cat foo.key foo.crt > foo.pem > > =A0 =A0 This is an application specific thing: some apps like key and cer= t > =A0 =A0 together like this, others use separate files for key and cert. I've got this done and referenced it within the c2s.xml file: [...] jabber.com [...] Is now this portion of the c2s.xml file however, I still get: [...] Mar 30 13:55:28 JABBER jabberd/sm[4580]: attempting connection to router at 127.0.0.1, port=3D5347 Mar 30 13:55:28 JABBER jabberd/router[4579]: [127.0.0.1, port=3D23777] conn= ect Mar 30 13:55:28 JABBER jabberd/router[4579]: [127.0.0.1, port=3D19978] conn= ect Mar 30 13:55:28 JABBER jabberd/s2s[4581]: connection to router established Mar 30 13:55:28 JABBER jabberd/router[4579]: [127.0.0.1, port=3D54420] authenticated as jabberd@jabberd-router Mar 30 13:55:28 JABBER jabberd/router[4579]: [s2s] set as default route Mar 30 13:55:28 JABBER jabberd/router[4579]: [s2s] online (bound to 127.0.0.1, port 54420) Mar 30 13:55:28 JABBER jabberd/c2s[4582]: connection to router established Mar 30 13:55:28 JABBER jabberd/router[4579]: [127.0.0.1, port=3D23777] authenticated as jabberd@jabberd-router Mar 30 13:55:28 JABBER jabberd/router[4579]: [c2s] online (bound to 127.0.0.1, port 23777) Mar 30 13:55:28 JABBER jabberd/sm[4580]: connection to router established Mar 30 13:55:28 JABBER jabberd/router[4579]: [127.0.0.1, port=3D19978] authenticated as jabberd@jabberd-router Mar 30 13:55:28 JABBER jabberd/router[4579]: [sm] online (bound to 127.0.0.1, port 19978) Mar 30 13:55:28 JABBER jabberd/sm[4580]: sm ready for sessions Mar 30 13:55:28 JABBER jabberd/router[4579]: [jabber.com] online (bound to 127.0.0.1, port 19978) Mar 30 13:55:28 JABBER jabberd/s2s[4581]: [0.0.0.0, port=3D5269] listening for connections Mar 30 13:55:28 JABBER jabberd/s2s[4581]: ready for connections Mar 30 13:55:28 JABBER jabberd/c2s[4582]: [0.0.0.0, port=3D5222] listening for connections Mar 30 13:55:28 JABBER jabberd/c2s[4582]: ready for connections Mar 30 13:55:42 JABBER jabberd/c2s[4582]: [8] [10.0.0.10, port=3D60660] con= nect Mar 30 13:55:42 JABBER jabberd/c2s[4582]: [8] [10.0.0.10, port=3D60660] disconnect jid=3Dunbound, packets: 0 Mar 30 13:55:45 JABBER jabberd/c2s[4582]: [8] [10.0.0.10, port=3D60661] con= nect Mar 30 13:55:45 JABBER jabberd/c2s[4582]: [8] [10.0.0.10, port=3D60661] disconnect jid=3Dunbound, packets: 0 The IM clients (Pidgin) settings are: Require Encryption Connection Port: 5222 Connection Server: srv.jabber.com Domain: jabber.com username: password: local alias: The Bind9 DNS zone looks like this: $TTL 1h ; default expiration time of all resource records without their own TTL value @ IN SOA ns1.jabber.com. info.jabber.com. ( 2012032802 ; serial number of this zone file 1d ; slave refresh (1 day) 2h ; slave retry time in case of a problem (2 hours) 4w ; slave expiration time (4 weeks) 1h ; maximum caching time in case of failed lookups (1 hour) ) ; @ IN NS ns1.jabber.com. ns1 IN A 10.0.0.1 srv.jabber.com. IN A 10.0.0.7 jabber.com. IN A 10.0.0.7 _xmpp-server._tcp.jabber.com. IN SRV 0 0 5269 srv.jabber.com. _xmpp-client._tcp.jabber.com. IN SRV 0 0 5222 srv.jabber.com. _jabber._tcp.jabber.com. IN SRV 0 0 5269 srv.jabber.com. I'm guessing everything is setup properly but I don't get why the system isn't connecting? The jabberd service starts meaning that it's connecting to the MySQL DB..... and looking at the config files everything else seems to be ok! Regards, Kaya > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Cheers, > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Matthew > > [*] Which just begs the question of "who is this CA and why should I > trust them to vouch for anyone else?" =A0Well, there's a hierarchy of > certification authorities. =A0The CA can itself issue a certificate for > its certificate-signing key that is itself signed by some higher CA > saying that they are fit and proper people to take that role. =A0And so > on, ad nauseam. =A0Eventually you get to the top level, so called 'root' > CAs, which are presumed to be so well known by everyone that you can > just trust them without further quibble. =A0(Yeah, right.) > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey > > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 12:10:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984811065670; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:10:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7848FC0C; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:10:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2UCAMhu080878; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:10:22 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2UCAMWt080857; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:10:22 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:10:18 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Julien Laffaye Message-ID: <20120330121018.GF49266@azathoth.lan> References: <20120330091241.GC49266@azathoth.lan> <20120330111043.GP88879@e-new.0x20.net> <4F75952A.80406@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5Mfx4RzfBqgnTE/w" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F75952A.80406@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Lars Engels , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] pkgng 1.0-beta9 please test X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:10:22 -0000 --5Mfx4RzfBqgnTE/w Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:12:42PM +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote: > On 03/30/2012 01:10 PM, Lars Engels wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:12:42AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On behalf of pkgng crew, I'm happy to announce pkg 1.0-beta9 > >> > > [...] > > > >> Please note that normally this will be the last beta version, > > So we can expect an official package repository with the first RC? > A public repo, maybe. An official repo endorsed by portmgr that's=20 > another story... :) Actually this is the story we will provide a repo for RC for sure regards, Bapt --5Mfx4RzfBqgnTE/w Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk91oqoACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ez5XgCePoNTnZBlOC6Ci3BNHBTdQsyU 95AAmgIRWkVj5Q2u5DqUpMEfNQ7IZwO6 =GzYy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5Mfx4RzfBqgnTE/w-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 13:16:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29751065670 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:16:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org) Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.49.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27708FC08 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A41155C45; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:16:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:16:25 -0400 From: Wesley Shields To: Peter Jeremy Message-ID: <20120330131625.GA30070@atarininja.org> References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org> <63ca1b333a310ecc2b1d1f0e1e1542a1.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> <4F7338C3.8020003@p6m7g8.com> <4F733C3A.7020004@missouri.edu> <4F734524.2000400@p6m7g8.com> <4F735340.1020103@FreeBSD.org> <4F7379FD.9040802@p6m7g8.com> <20120329200243.GA76833@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120329200243.GA76833@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, "Philip M. Gollucci" Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:16:26 -0000 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 07:02:43AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2012-Mar-28 20:52:13 +0000, "Philip M. Gollucci" wrote: > >Absolutely, b/c we maintain PORTREVISION for pointyhat not the end users > > This is completely backwards. The Project exists for end-users and > end users need a way to determine when there's been a change to a port > that needs them to re-install that port. Pointyhat provides automated > testing facilities as a way to improve the quality of FreeBSD because > not all committers are sufficiently careful. > > If PORTREVISION cannot adequately serve both end users & pointyhat, > then the ports system needs an additional, new flag to trigger pointyhat. I think Philip was wrong in his statement. PORTREVISION exists for the reason of telling the ports infrastructure (which pointyhat and the users use) of updates. End users and pointyhat use it constantly. -- WXS From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 13:18:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F63B106564A; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:18:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org) Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.49.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA6B08FC14; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:18:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 91FFC5C3A; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:18:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:18:16 -0400 From: Wesley Shields To: Jason Helfman Message-ID: <20120330131816.GB30070@atarininja.org> References: <20120329184921.GA2021@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <4F74BC4F.70801@FreeBSD.org> <20120329204016.GT82505@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120329204016.GT82505@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Gabor Kovesdan , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: post-deinstall target is invalid X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:18:17 -0000 On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 01:40:16PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 09:47:27PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan thus spake: > >On 2012.03.29. 20:49, Jason Helfman wrote: > >> I will work on a effort, as well, to get some supporting documentation > >> into > >> the Porter's Handbook. > >Jason, thanks for this cleanup work. Have you checked if there is any > >portlint check for this? It would also be very valuable. > > > >Gabor > > > Your welcome, and thanks. > > I did consider it, however it was also noted to me that portlint shouldn't > take the place of poor port coding. That doesn't mean it can't be done, but > I also tend to agree with this. Perhaps adding logic to bpm would be a good > way to wrap it up, as well. I'm not sure we should add anything to bpm. It's a legitimate name of a custom target which maintainers can use if they want. We should be vigilant of code which assumes it will be called though, but there's nothing wrong with it being a custom target that the maintainer wants for one reason or another. -- WXS From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 13:33:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB12B106566B for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:33:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836F68FC0C for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:33:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7CBD23C03 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:33:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BCDDD23C01 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:33:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from MikeBook-Air.local (10.80.0.4) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:33:35 -0400 Message-ID: <4F75B632.3070900@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:33:38 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org> <63ca1b333a310ecc2b1d1f0e1e1542a1.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> <4F7338C3.8020003@p6m7g8.com> <4F733C3A.7020004@missouri.edu> <4F734524.2000400@p6m7g8.com> <4F735340.1020103@FreeBSD.org> <4F7379FD.9040802@p6m7g8.com> <20120329200243.GA76833@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20120330131625.GA30070@atarininja.org> In-Reply-To: <20120330131625.GA30070@atarininja.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:33:38 -0000 On 3/30/12 9:16 AM, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 07:02:43AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: >> > On 2012-Mar-28 20:52:13 +0000, "Philip M. Gollucci" wrote: >>> > >Absolutely, b/c we maintain PORTREVISION for pointyhat not the end users >> I think Philip was wrong in his statement. PORTREVISION exists for the > maybe Philip forgot to put in the smilie face. and was making a joke. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 14:40:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (pointyhat.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::2b]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB47106564A for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:40:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@freebsd.org) Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2UEeccR077396 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:40:38 GMT (envelope-from erwin@pointyhat.freebsd.org) Received: (from erwin@localhost) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id q2UEecvb077386 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:40:38 GMT (envelope-from erwin) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:40:38 GMT From: Erwin Lansing Message-Id: <201203301440.q2UEecvb077386@pointyhat.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: INDEX build failed for 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:40:38 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: lazarus-0.9.30 Committers on the hook: bapt decke delphij ehaupt pav rm scheidell wen Most recent CVS update was: U Mk/bsd.sites.mk U devel/py-pylib/Makefile U devel/py-pylib/pkg-descr U editors/lazarus-gtk2/Makefile U emulators/virtualbox-ose/Makefile U emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod/Makefile U net/Makefile U net/liferea/Makefile U net/liferea/distinfo U net/nyancat/Makefile U net/nyancat/distinfo U net/nyancat/pkg-descr U net/nyancat/files/pkg-message.in U ports-mgmt/pkg/Makefile U ports-mgmt/pkg/files/patch-pkg__check.c From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 15:15:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5540106566B for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:15:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@dataix.net) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A89C8FC15 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so1504017iah.13 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:15:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dataix.net; s=rsa; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=pqztFnzx3x+sNhIYyhCFP2WFaNm0Pu16eOUYgF1VaCM=; b=QGkHwxyRY63rGbt/x6zKgGg8dTaTmz6Y8gAOvsGHeckk6F3QIWVeD4w+fRoCHGJ45r aP8k/9kqK1BEWDWRFj6+0I2jzH2klbkQTFQPQqQKY62eES02uYPb8jQ+gL+yd5mez9YR aFqI0j2G8gHEBfWD5jkGZEciFV1qvRUK2kCb4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :content-type; bh=pqztFnzx3x+sNhIYyhCFP2WFaNm0Pu16eOUYgF1VaCM=; b=PPXiD1RE27mWKPxkDV6HJCA9+pibKPOajTIs8sBFI6p1UtbihR9fk9fWiWkZ1Ch4Ln nvESyh9rkUzpshK1jOaCSimz6KFiUujByQA0UVXjU5xhEjf89ECvmV7pGVySlpRp3lHr ojmLm5oJ2arh4OTh4fSSCiN9Lym3UxvkdPd++eWnBYIm7BqXklNE2qisLD6itTiZ8eqy iFy777JqJtQojhN439OBvC3bcBOaP4lrbmHp9tAVorKJpcxWVJe4u1QavnbRIwZ/BndU T07uRIX02yQZAhODAFJBJ3rzWUqrL1u+QsOPFUb4Hw34vxtEvQhEx8cdR2FEeeAxOVuM EA6g== Received: by 10.42.153.10 with SMTP id k10mr1450173icw.24.1333120554016; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (adsl-99-181-151-192.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net. [99.181.151.192]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id xt2sm1830074igb.6.2012.03.30.08.15.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:15:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2UFFoao056629 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:15:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Received: (from jhellenthal@localhost) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2UFFotO056401 for ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:15:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:15:50 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120330151550.GA78586@DataIX.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmdiCP+7tlR8dA7ielUSp37028yyd41hxKgdSzFV6XRAi5lC9wLcZeXwFtaMXCUNuv7VDdu Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=90e6ba2121f7127ca304bc7751b0 Cc: Subject: FW: [ast-users] Feature request: AST grep as shell built in X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:15:56 -0000 --90e6ba2121f7127ca304bc7751b0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Just a heads up for everyone who may find this interesting... But builtin grep and friends have now been added to ksh93... ----- Forwarded message from Glenn Fowler ----- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:42:05 -0400 =46rom: Glenn Fowler To: gsf@research.att.com, wendlin1974@googlemail.com Cc: ast-users@research.att.com, ast-developers@research.att.com Subject: Re: [ast-users] Feature request: AST grep as shell built in X-Mailer: mailx (AT&T/BSD) 9.9 2012-02-29 ast-cmdtst.2012-03-30.tgz md5 e84b44ba46bef61cf68c4d22dddf3b6b source just posted to www.research.att.com/sw/download/beta/ it requires nmake to build so you will need either the ast-base or ast-open package installed download ast-cmdtst.2012-03-30.tgz lib/package/tgz bin/package read bin/package use # new ksh with viewpath env ready to build cd cmdtst nmake install nmake test then this line in a ksh script to test builtin -f cmdtst grep egrep fgrep xargs all of the standalone grep and xargs tests pass but the builtin environment could introduce new bug vectors -- don't ask me or the list how to build plugins without nmake its encoded in the nmake rules and probe files its portable to all target architectures (including linux hpux aix cygwin u= win mvs macos) it uses the same conditional-free makefile on all target architectures it generates files using the native system file and directory naming conven= tions in general ast { plugins, shared libraries, dlls } require nmake and do not build with the bootstrap mamake/Mamfile=20 that's why bin/package always builds nmake first and then proceeds with the= remaining components _______________________________________________ ast-users mailing list ast-users@research.att.com https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users ----- End forwarded message ----- --=20 ;s =3D; --90e6ba2121f7127ca304bc7751b0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPdc4lAAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+s/kH/0UGwsCa4hj1JeI2rCBSCOd0 MY6X+BmFe/FBg65nc5R/6WIh3rpKfIbzYCSqOFx64o5n5zxrJvFfha8yknyMBpas x9RcVqN2tJRkbD9f3m7VpPV/OECoxnJTaeZ/D8DKgB8/aXLmek/wUBj7vJWb39fY Zwvyq+XgJQzX1mL1QHQfYV1ScgbeEdn6Bgr5nH+IZMYO8UC3WyvHpm5RqDz8Plq/ fNCYbW/zXq7wbB7BXmmMnShpMpXb9sInAAHSU0iS2EjqBMVWIplg30qm8WvLVg45 6cPG+fTx5GI2nAvwQ+m0kgCk20kNUU5u2Hq+o2nCpVP7u//OkGJVIjtR3FYFQL8= =48FL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --90e6ba2121f7127ca304bc7751b0-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 15:42:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2ED1106564A; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:42:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DECB8FC08; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:42:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so846432bkc.13 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:42:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mWto2inDhNq+4Ij5ubU+bCGW3S5g3MEpkcBum3GPnrw=; b=B3Wkfpf9UL6QiTGXHyOG0jGz8M18rLMNUkOjQaFDa2FRGO6PxIlbztnwLS7xHGeP7a e2tgIT/LPX9+JHO365xbb4/M7thA3ez9NAfoj70HDfBoTMCT62GPiFZKEsgSGMCYqhtF SDPBqL1CHrjtDf9PA6PJy2hZSMgdI1NMXyPgwGDIvcXERflieQdpYVfyWhi4P35kq3bz NXQkHhnuNhQYUxBkcRDdNpjHfsRnNtACN1R+g/FiT5SwA+qajWIoytywtsqu1bmpj1h6 cTd2CVctXMx8ra9PuwU0kQFy+cymewYIRwrGfe8MRvW5WiHH5A5aj+CFRuy68zzJnWh1 LxJQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.150.86 with SMTP id x22mr1177119bkv.136.1333122145916; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:42:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:42:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:42:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F75932C.4020002@FreeBSD.org> References: <201203300736.q2U7aS20071017@pointyhat.freebsd.org> <4F75932C.4020002@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:42:25 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Michael Scheidell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INDEX build failed for 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:42:27 -0000 On 30 Mar 2012 12:04, "Michael Scheidell" wrote: > > > > On 3/30/12 3:36 AM, Erwin Lansing wrote: >> >> INDEX build failed with errors: >> Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. >> Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: lazarus-0.9.30 >> >> Committers on the hook: >> scheidell wen >> >> Most recent CVS update was: >> U editors/Makefile >> U editors/lazarus-gtk2/Makefile >> U editors/lazarus-gtk2/pkg-descr > > I marked port BROKEN for now so INDEX builds. Will get with submitter on his proposed fixes. > (Master port needs CONFLICTS added for this and lazarus-qt4 also) > If you tried PKGPREFIX I wouldn't be at all surprised :) Try PKGNAMESUFFIX=-qt4, and check it isn't clobbered in the master Makefile; using hyphens for this in PORTNAME isn't the way to go about it. make -V PKGNAME is your friend here, or even better make describe shows you what the INDEX line will look like (before it's transformed) Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 16:50:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860CA106566B for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:50:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FDE48FC15 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:50:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82171621C06; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:50:32 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B169621C03; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:50:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.22.2] (166.248.76.13) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:50:30 -0400 Message-ID: <4F75E45C.7030307@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:50:36 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <201203300736.q2U7aS20071017@pointyhat.freebsd.org> <4F75932C.4020002@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INDEX build failed for 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:50:38 -0000 On 3/30/12 11:42 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > > make -V PKGNAME is your friend here, or even better make describe > shows you what the INDEX line will look like (before it's transformed) > Think I tried that. if this was a minor mistake by a submitter, or even maybe a minor mistake by the maintainer, I might spend some time on it. But since this is a new port, and this person wants to be trusted at a maintainer, (and I have a day job), I'll see if he can't fix it first. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 16:50:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934FC1065672; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:50:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryao@cs.stonybrook.edu) Received: from edge1.cs.stonybrook.edu (edge1.cs.stonybrook.edu [130.245.9.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322E98FC12; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from HUBCAS1.cs.stonybrook.edu (130.245.9.206) by edge1.cs.stonybrook.edu (130.245.9.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:50:50 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (72.89.250.133) by hubcas1.cs.stonybrook.edu (130.245.9.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:50:54 -0400 Message-ID: <4F75E404.8000104@cs.stonybrook.edu> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:49:08 -0400 From: Richard Yao User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120301 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: , X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig395F2084D9FBB042B112C827" X-Originating-IP: [72.89.250.133] Cc: Subject: emulators/freebsd-kmod X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:50:56 -0000 --------------enig395F2084D9FBB042B112C827 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Ports Maintainers and kuriyama, emulators/freebsd-kmod has a typo in pkg-descr, where it says "lodable" instead of "loadable". In addition, I have done the work necessary to port emulators/freebsd-kmod to Gentoo/FreeBSD. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D410199 The ebuild contains a few improvements on the original FreeBSD port where we copy only the parts of SYSDIR that we need to build the module. We also do hardlinks instead of copies when Gentoo Portage builds with user privileges. The NEEDSUBDIRS part of the ebuild was written by naota AT gentoo.org as part of Gentoo's review process. I have permission from him to upstream the improvements we made on the port. Feel free to adopt any improvements in the attachments in that bug report. Lastly, I have sent an email to gentoo-dev AT lists.gentoo.org and gentoo-bsd AT lists.gentoo.org requesting that the FreeBSD specific parts of the portage tree be relicensed under terms of the BSD-2 license. With a little luck, it will be possible to upstream improvements made in Gentoo/FreeBSD without any hassle in the future. Yours truly, Richard Yao --------------enig395F2084D9FBB042B112C827 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPdeQIAAoJELFAT5FmjZuE48gP/1yNE3Val9V6w2JxuRRDbPTL fmba8qeTapDtPtJ39nkanURZkbv6n2g0oTydx7Hqi+tHjQzUMRK045te60m5Ewki EKt6uLAGmhr45AO7gbdPuxpI/gJogjSyDSVGd1XpRGV++DxDaP6Clw+QYhL4PpOp qRKbNXevydb82InpkvpRJfYk+VOfSBqPV4HFlPk2wZnJXfvgG/WvzN7lL2f6LQgp hTUC7fzvVGA3p9mIvpCuk3rCLW2IAzbGPCfHMD2NHrvjOezAVoNIMDhIk2qEmdw4 ingZDX0fVkVtzqrGnijTT/4EqCRcyZZsiYpTiipmNtS5pmtrZxSrRbED205JFgYk VU6fhC6cTkTDeBEFhJZXqNnnEwRP1Iaw9FMnnd0JK8gBNvr/CkS/ENEIpuC24BwK 6GILz8V8ApNHEgj1v0GHFUtZ9w9aLa82ei34gb86mtE21yuYdOp3UvDO87m/OGY2 GlglioImJOyxqSCmlF1xPLNc95VEmpzAVcSbHVPM3Je+cTjh75nrem/50hZauU5k lXzIGFpM8CJua51AAn8B4AQqWkNvVpaQ20M6+UlNFsB96Qd6qSqnQ29X8kpMwn91 jVdhINsRB1AVX/+brAWEgzjjju0+OcUrwKdUikloY+MYML9HG/UpJZ0pz4rH/UXq rf7b8LUGmpP/bZ6Rpged =HNyw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig395F2084D9FBB042B112C827-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 17:07:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (pointyhat.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::2b]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099741065670 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:07:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@freebsd.org) Received: from pointyhat.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2UH7re6033955 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:07:53 GMT (envelope-from erwin@pointyhat.freebsd.org) Received: (from erwin@localhost) by pointyhat.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id q2UH7rgQ033951 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:07:53 GMT (envelope-from erwin) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:07:53 GMT From: Erwin Lansing Message-Id: <201203301707.q2UH7rgQ033951@pointyhat.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: INDEX now builds successfully on 7.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:07:54 -0000 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 17:57:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A35A1065670; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:57:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f42.google.com (mail-qa0-f42.google.com [209.85.216.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59128FC17; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:57:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qafi31 with SMTP id i31so716534qaf.15 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:57:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=2rZDx6Q2Druko89j0ZSgIXUBfMKftB+12At7E2Hg4+c=; b=zi6MPU92OgJ9/So9NH98eijjvghI095bVZ3Ky3QUzPdmho6AQBcclxIbvFQ2jeRSec M9l0DvLP+RI+HPbM463MC10VsUlZcEugr0wTwTrNg30gTDlS+hXoVpylgf2NnodlSrI/ je/WpPETurUhhSRsSKJ1tYFMFif7LE+ToVNwO4J60C921apPIuTh6peZuu6J1YCGoaO0 hZW2UImf3oVS9hJI6zVYMIevPSscHwLCUI2PIlasryV/jR1rhxKkHxJWjjuOUEY+h7aQ pQYtFntaQ7ke5iXVtaXlwIk5pFpxtOVx3cza4EgqDIIytFt0xqz9xpMNIeNhJgkAk5G5 X/Tw== Received: by 10.229.136.72 with SMTP id q8mr1197842qct.150.1333130235909; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from philip.hq.rws (wsip-174-79-184-239.dc.dc.cox.net. [174.79.184.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gr10sm14458481qab.17.2012.03.30.10.57.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F75F3ED.9000508@p6m7g8.com> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:57:01 +0000 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6M7G8 Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111029 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wesley Shields References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org> <63ca1b333a310ecc2b1d1f0e1e1542a1.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> <4F7338C3.8020003@p6m7g8.com> <4F733C3A.7020004@missouri.edu> <4F734524.2000400@p6m7g8.com> <4F735340.1020103@FreeBSD.org> <4F7379FD.9040802@p6m7g8.com> <20120329200243.GA76833@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20120330131625.GA30070@atarininja.org> In-Reply-To: <20120330131625.GA30070@atarininja.org> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE54AACC5C48A3BE99B195B2E" Cc: ports@freebsd.org, "Philip M. Gollucci" , Peter Jeremy Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:57:23 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE54AACC5C48A3BE99B195B2E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/30/12 13:16, Wesley Shields wrote: > End users and pointyhat use it constantly. I might not agree with my statement myself; however its the way thing are. Historically even. If this was not the case, we would bump when the NON-DEFAULT packages change. (read OPTIONS or different versions of say perl) Rather than contradicting me, it would be great if a portmgr@ could chime in and say one way or the other. --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Director Operations, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. --------------enigE54AACC5C48A3BE99B195B2E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFPdfPvdbiP+9ubjBwRAnVkAJ9P0uLhAsYp9m9YBkU7BpqJWeEolgCgkW2d GwCn7ULGHL7HC//GfktLMHs= =69Pk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE54AACC5C48A3BE99B195B2E-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 18:23:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338E21065672; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:23:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f42.google.com (mail-qa0-f42.google.com [209.85.216.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22AE8FC19; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:23:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qafi31 with SMTP id i31so737112qaf.15 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:23:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=PvSC6gsbJ9CBs7UaTh6Jp0/uAmXk/83mAQkDi2/FbR4=; b=CJKUPZyWBpAkwD2CFb/nSLUQZlmzkN4tKfLm+YerxP3Qs8tE22DtLfypgDYmXhOO6R gTaLgsh1I+m8QerRdwn0N833bzP0LqZFtDbO1TG5f3DYqqtrn7zTdL19OWiGdwA1gbCU 0Lp34TdI7iTFIPfiZfnAwD5sTh4CXxoVjkGaFViEE1/4i1zESzUFSOM7WpqSPu6vy/CV ZpDxHak1LTtZUR8v+eY7VDcnCvk9gKDdHmzvM4Sl8t96PDLG7roAnOXrFo+B2NAankVp didp5SpTX+YJcCmtLFkC2cZdK4W2TqG2C3aYo6quuO1BXCuVWIKUGLJzOq74pE7iPHoU wNtQ== Received: by 10.229.136.76 with SMTP id q12mr1271175qct.63.1333131834829; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:23:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from philip.hq.rws (wsip-174-79-184-239.dc.dc.cox.net. [174.79.184.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i19sm19552856qad.19.2012.03.30.11.23.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F75FA31.2030806@p6m7g8.com> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:23:45 +0000 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6M7G8 Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111029 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Philip M. Gollucci" References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org> <63ca1b333a310ecc2b1d1f0e1e1542a1.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> <4F7338C3.8020003@p6m7g8.com> <4F733C3A.7020004@missouri.edu> <4F734524.2000400@p6m7g8.com> <4F735340.1020103@FreeBSD.org> <4F7379FD.9040802@p6m7g8.com> <20120329200243.GA76833@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20120330131625.GA30070@atarininja.org> <4F75F3ED.9000508@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <4F75F3ED.9000508@p6m7g8.com> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5501E2568309146325517CE3" Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Wesley Shields , Peter Jeremy Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:23:56 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5501E2568309146325517CE3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/30/12 17:57, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > On 03/30/12 13:16, Wesley Shields wrote: >> End users and pointyhat use it constantly. > I might not agree with my statement myself; however its the way thing > are. Historically even. If this was not the case, we would bump when > the NON-DEFAULT packages change. (read OPTIONS or different versions of= > say perl) >=20 > Rather than contradicting me, it would be great if a portmgr@ could > chime in and say one way or the other. >=20 >=20 >=20 I'm already knee deep in this thread, so let me say why we do it this way right now. If you bump it when you change a non-default setting but not the default one, you waste pointyhat resources for no reason. If you don't bump it, you save the resources on pointyhat, but you make "end users" life 'harder'. Personally, I don't care either way, b/c I know what changes result in a package change. Just having a formal policy is all thats needed. --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Director Operations, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. --------------enig5501E2568309146325517CE3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFPdfo4dbiP+9ubjBwRAjNVAJ9jg3Nh3tzX5FfQk4Za9QIlUssGhQCgh2ns 0rWypB6hmd7FmdebzM+Kzag= =4PkK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5501E2568309146325517CE3-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 19:49:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D421065670; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:49:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBEA28FC17; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:49:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2UJnd6P006438; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:49:39 GMT (envelope-from dougb@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from dougb@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2UJnd6g006434; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:49:39 GMT (envelope-from dougb) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:49:39 GMT Message-Id: <201203301949.q2UJnd6g006434@freefall.freebsd.org> To: dougb@FreeBSD.org, dougb@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org From: dougb@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/166248: sendmail dies of signal 11 on freebsd in a virtualbox guest X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:49:40 -0000 Synopsis: sendmail dies of signal 11 on freebsd in a virtualbox guest Responsible-Changed-From-To: dougb->freebsd-ports Responsible-Changed-By: dougb Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Mar 30 19:49:02 UTC 2012 Responsible-Changed-Why: I have no connection to sendmail. You probably want to ask gshapiro. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166248 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 19:55:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FCA1065672 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:55:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28FCC8FC1F for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:55:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1477CD23C03 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:55:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3472D23C01 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:55:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from MikeBook-Air.local (10.80.0.4) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:55:27 -0400 Message-ID: <4F760FB3.6020708@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:55:31 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org> <63ca1b333a310ecc2b1d1f0e1e1542a1.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> <4F7338C3.8020003@p6m7g8.com> <4F733C3A.7020004@missouri.edu> <4F734524.2000400@p6m7g8.com> <4F735340.1020103@FreeBSD.org> <4F7379FD.9040802@p6m7g8.com> <20120329200243.GA76833@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20120330131625.GA30070@atarininja.org> <4F75F3ED.9000508@p6m7g8.com> <4F75FA31.2030806@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <4F75FA31.2030806@p6m7g8.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:55:30 -0000 So, lets start: Am I the only one that finds he is too stupid to actually figure this out? I think it is still the most confusing aspect of committing/maintaining. When to bump PORTREVISION: * If you think the end user needs to rebuild the port. When not to bump PORTREVION: * If you think its a noop/waste of time/cpu for the end user to rebuild the port. Ok, flesh this out: examples When to bump PORTREVISION (when you want end user to build the port) * Mandatory: o When package changes (make package) o When dependencies change (Adding USE_PERL/BUILD_PERL/GETTEXT counts) o When pkg-plist changes (except for fixing .ifdef/NOPORT(DOCS|EXAMPLES)) o When the master port changes o When PORTVERSION CHANGES (must change back to 0, delete line) o When you want to force a relink with an updated (fixed) library o If a patch fixes something in the port o If you add new functionality o If you add/delete an OPTION o If you change the default for an OPTION * port committers have authority to bump PORTREVISION maintainer (implicit) if the master port/library port/dependency port requires any dependency to fit the list above. when NOT to * just fixing .ifdef/NOPORT(DOCS|EXAMPLES)) * if port was broken on any arch. (rebuilding on existing arch is a noop, and fixed arch didn't package anyway) * Fixing typo's in pkg-message, Comment * Updating port maintainer (new one or resetting port maintainer) * just petting portlint ( after name to ), re-order sections (notice I left out pointyhat.. if it is overworked, lets send more hardware) -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 19:56:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5C5106567D for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:56:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496E08FC1C for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:56:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539AF621C0D for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:56:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C52A621C03 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:56:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from MikeBook-Air.local (10.80.0.4) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:56:23 -0400 Message-ID: <4F760FEC.1040309@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:56:28 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <201203301949.q2UJnd6g006434@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201203301949.q2UJnd6g006434@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ports/166248: sendmail dies of signal 11 on freebsd in a virtualbox guest X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:56:26 -0000 On 3/30/12 3:49 PM, dougb@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Synopsis: sendmail dies of signal 11 on freebsd in a virtualbox guest > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: dougb->freebsd-ports > Responsible-Changed-By: dougb > Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Mar 30 19:49:02 UTC 2012 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > > I have no connection to sendmail. You probably want to ask gshapiro. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166248 shouldn't that be freebsd-ports-bugs? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 20:35:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FFF1106564A; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 20:35:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48698FC12; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 20:35:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so722307qcs.13 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:35:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=1Vsmz5+gChCN7aVfgZIWsV53fbM0QXHa9cVp00tQDcY=; b=hYQlHZenUehn2Cg8D09RYiFQZXMIdzfq/T/wybqC96mYu3O22TRJG/gCdU6nGhEsL6 Oq5NXGJpoUDuFkrUTjCDaQtRYmPRkY98+d/xM8MsrQq4rK4JT25eunhklffQJHLzUULw t6CjUcC/gBzIHq++HPIksbBDaSNBsvKatsD21jozvTHKx4VD7eY7KjVQ4CUo0mnlS16F FpRIwHbnsVX1pqgqnZ6htMAhgO2mQq+6wmft7qtLu0389ysq7s0SBqV5chZl7gWp41VE PC9fOBFqF2dfvN6OEHVx58L4m5iyJSYzjexBWijy0G0kK+Je/OThgoSaZCLDGwtdI5sC fxTw== Received: by 10.229.102.88 with SMTP id f24mr1386666qco.117.1333139749940; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from philip.hq.rws (wsip-174-79-184-239.dc.dc.cox.net. [174.79.184.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i8sm20175078qah.4.2012.03.30.13.35.48 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F761921.7030505@p6m7g8.com> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 20:35:45 +0000 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6M7G8 Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111029 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Scheidell References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org> <63ca1b333a310ecc2b1d1f0e1e1542a1.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> <4F7338C3.8020003@p6m7g8.com> <4F733C3A.7020004@missouri.edu> <4F734524.2000400@p6m7g8.com> <4F735340.1020103@FreeBSD.org> <4F7379FD.9040802@p6m7g8.com> <20120329200243.GA76833@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20120330131625.GA30070@atarininja.org> <4F75F3ED.9000508@p6m7g8.com> <4F75FA31.2030806@p6m7g8.com> <4F760FB3.6020708@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F760FB3.6020708@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig33DDD0DDD6A1308C9AE872D0" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 20:35:51 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig33DDD0DDD6A1308C9AE872D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/30/12 19:55, Michael Scheidell wrote: >=20 > * Mandatory: > o When package changes (make package) yes. Lets call this #1 > o When dependencies change (Adding USE_PERL/BUILD_PERL/GETTEXT= > counts) #1 covers this. > o When pkg-plist changes (except for fixing > .ifdef/NOPORT(DOCS|EXAMPLES)) #1 covers this, this is the OPTIONS case (default vs not) > o When the master port changes #1 covers this > o When PORTVERSION CHANGES (must change back to 0, delete line= ) #1 covers this. > o When you want to force a relink with an updated (fixed) libr= ary #1 covers this. This is in the library port itself. The dependencies figure this out. > o If a patch fixes something in the port #1 covers this. > o If you add new functionality #1 covers this. > o If you add/delete an OPTION #1 covers this. (default vs not default OPTIONS). If you count the end user it doesn't matter if its off by default. > o If you change the default for an OPTION #1 covers this. > * port committers have authority to bump PORTREVISION maintainer > (implicit) if the master port/library port/dependency port > requires any dependency to fit the list above. not really relevant. * just fixing .ifdef/NOPORT(DOCS|EXAMPLES)) sure is relevant see above * if port was broken on any arch. (rebuilding on existing arch is a noop, and fixed arch didn't package anyway) removing IGNORE,BROKEN do not require this b/c there was previously no package. * Fixing typo's in pkg-message, Comment Yes, the package changes, but no the functionality doesn't, so this is correct. * Updating port maintainer (new one or resetting port maintainer) Correct. * just petting portlint ( after name to ), re-order sectio= ns Correct. In short what you change is irrelevant. Does the resultant package change. Yes or No. The only question you need to answer is do we bump if the resultant package changes for configs other than default. --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Director Operations, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. --------------enig33DDD0DDD6A1308C9AE872D0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFPdhkjdbiP+9ubjBwRAsJaAJ0XHN9dxeOY9WWlm3IUvTbGN0RAYACgkmFw irWrVI40p6O1ervMx3aUVIY= =MinF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig33DDD0DDD6A1308C9AE872D0-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 23:05:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37CE81065673; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 23:05:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059628FC08; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 23:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2UN524h090134; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 23:05:02 GMT (envelope-from linimon@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2UN52CL090130; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 23:05:02 GMT (envelope-from linimon) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 23:05:02 GMT Message-Id: <201203302305.q2UN52CL090130@freefall.freebsd.org> To: linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: linimon@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/166248: sendmail dies of signal 11 on freebsd in a virtualbox guest X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 23:05:03 -0000 Synopsis: sendmail dies of signal 11 on freebsd in a virtualbox guest Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->freebsd-ports-bugs Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Mar 30 23:04:27 UTC 2012 Responsible-Changed-Why: Canonicalize assignment. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166248 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 31 04:14:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84285106564A; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 04:14:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@e-e.com) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.pub.dw.redsrci.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F668FC14; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 04:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48BF6F2ABA; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:14:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=e-e.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :user-agent:from:from:subject:subject:date:date:references :in-reply-to:message-id:received:received:received; s=ee; t= 1333167242; x=1334981642; bh=0/MMdPvh+cG+PkQcZQ+5jPDOGQTJXE+OuPd hH02L3Ro=; b=ToMuBkoYVIQ3dIEkkEKESw8NMuxFT5ZabCUcZRvq3oXZSRxyJ2A SIwl4I9ozBMOlul35S5MY242y/bIjuiJwS2sk9jSMCJTsAXCt2wsGqlDDdE3olTf DnB2Z5Dwr4E6CfUzTYV9u/9VLUVRnMUigNQgv5waQ4cCKEt5XK0iHho0= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.dw.redsrci.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dy6WKgO705UG; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:14:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640606F2649; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:14:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 76.251.118.198 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhelfman) by mail.experts-exchange.com with HTTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:14:02 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20120330131816.GB30070@atarininja.org> References: <20120329184921.GA2021@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <4F74BC4F.70801@FreeBSD.org> <20120329204016.GT82505@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <20120330131816.GB30070@atarininja.org> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:14:02 -0700 From: "Jason Helfman" To: "Wesley Shields" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Jason Helfman , Gabor Kovesdan , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: post-deinstall target is invalid X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 04:14:09 -0000 > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 01:40:16PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 09:47:27PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan thus spake: >> >On 2012.03.29. 20:49, Jason Helfman wrote: >> >> I will work on a effort, as well, to get some supporting >> documentation >> >> into >> >> the Porter's Handbook. >> >Jason, thanks for this cleanup work. Have you checked if there is any >> >portlint check for this? It would also be very valuable. >> > >> >Gabor >> > >> Your welcome, and thanks. >> >> I did consider it, however it was also noted to me that portlint >> shouldn't >> take the place of poor port coding. That doesn't mean it can't be done, >> but >> I also tend to agree with this. Perhaps adding logic to bpm would be a >> good >> way to wrap it up, as well. > > I'm not sure we should add anything to bpm. It's a legitimate name of a > custom target which maintainers can use if they want. We should be > vigilant of code which assumes it will be called though, but there's > nothing wrong with it being a custom target that the maintainer wants > for one reason or another. > > -- WXS > > I don't completely disagree, however the target is never used, and in all cases it merely performed the actions that were already being done in a pkg-deinstall script, or the action wasn't done due to an assumption that the target was valid. -jgh From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 31 04:14:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67B9106566B; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 04:14:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@e-e.com) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.pub.dw.redsrci.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF51C8FC12; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 04:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6D0700FD8; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:14:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=e-e.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :user-agent:from:from:subject:subject:date:date:references :in-reply-to:message-id:received:received:received; s=ee; t= 1333167270; x=1334981670; bh=0hUe+eDTd6aznACkAhaHToeZeRzA6pKy38l /7+YhEX0=; b=T/Km31Z1WjOgW8EfUrwbEibYWlvCY2lcDppgrGgIj7MT4IVktIp oVLY3coYhs22LvxXuAUeLKliSgXvz7p8UYHOI49lGjPXGySZx9ibcw0d6yntYydU uJQHB+/KymnP6CcUW4YPtHX+Fro/PbWcIjCzEKD8dsWQ8JN8RqBz48rQ= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.dw.redsrci.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S6LtAF2j9EMU; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:14:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB606F3C6B; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:14:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 76.251.118.198 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhelfman) by mail.experts-exchange.com with HTTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:14:30 -0700 Message-ID: <7a415d63aa8f4edf2c89185caf1573db.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> In-Reply-To: <4F760FEC.1040309@FreeBSD.org> References: <201203301949.q2UJnd6g006434@freefall.freebsd.org> <4F760FEC.1040309@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:14:30 -0700 From: "Jason Helfman" To: "Michael Scheidell" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/166248: sendmail dies of signal 11 on freebsd in a virtualbox guest X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 04:14:30 -0000 > > > On 3/30/12 3:49 PM, dougb@FreeBSD.org wrote: >> Synopsis: sendmail dies of signal 11 on freebsd in a virtualbox guest >> >> Responsible-Changed-From-To: dougb->freebsd-ports >> Responsible-Changed-By: dougb >> Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Mar 30 19:49:02 UTC 2012 >> Responsible-Changed-Why: >> >> I have no connection to sendmail. You probably want to ask gshapiro. >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166248 > shouldn't that be freebsd-ports-bugs? > it was reassigned, but yes. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 31 07:01:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mandree.no-ip.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897A5106566C; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 07:01:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mandree@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B522623CEAF; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:01:58 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4F76ABE6.206@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:01:58 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120313 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rm@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: rawtherapee 4.0.7 build failure on 9-STABLE amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 07:01:59 -0000 Ruslan, I cannot build rawtherapee 4.0.7 on 9-STABLE amd64, re-running it after failure with "make MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes" yields: [ 5%] Building CXX object rtengine/CMakeFiles/rtengine.dir/ipresize.cc.o In file included from /var/tmp/usr/ports/graphics/rawtherapee/work/rawtherapee-4.0.7/rtengine/ipresize.cc:20: /var/tmp/usr/ports/graphics/rawtherapee/work/rawtherapee-4.0.7/rtengine/improcfun.h:21:13: warning: extra tokens at end of #ifndef directive In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.2/cmath:54, from /var/tmp/usr/ports/graphics/rawtherapee/work/rawtherapee-4.0.7/rtengine/../rtexif/rtexif.h:28, from /var/tmp/usr/ports/graphics/rawtherapee/work/rawtherapee-4.0.7/rtengine/rtengine.h:28, from /var/tmp/usr/ports/graphics/rawtherapee/work/rawtherapee-4.0.7/rtengine/imageio.h:30, from /var/tmp/usr/ports/graphics/rawtherapee/work/rawtherapee-4.0.7/rtengine/imagefloat.h:25, from /var/tmp/usr/ports/graphics/rawtherapee/work/rawtherapee-4.0.7/rtengine/improcfun.h:25, from /var/tmp/usr/ports/graphics/rawtherapee/work/rawtherapee-4.0.7/rtengine/ipresize.cc:20: /usr/include/math.h:239: error: expected `)' before '/' token *** Error code 1 math.h line 239 declares "double log2(double);", so I presume that patch-rtengine_improcfun.h proves harmful here; the "#ifndef log2(x)" is bogus if log2 isn't declared as macro (and is actually what breaks the compile), and the macro is #define log2(x) ((log(x)/log(2)). It might be more useful to do this instead: static const double lnOf2 = log(2); static inline double log2(double x) { return log(x)/lnOf2; } or possibly checking math.h for log2() before adding the patch. I'm afraid I won't have the time to do that now; could you? Thanks. Best, Matthias From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 31 08:44:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96326106566B; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:44:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward10.mail.yandex.net (forward10.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:202::5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015B38FC0A; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp6.mail.yandex.net (smtp6.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.56]) by forward10.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 98DDC1020240; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:44:00 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1333183440; bh=1W09GtU5earToApyr2sSnk5BD2Uam0XEFRadbCjRHQc=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=oDIczx1hqwsdVmoMn07+HF3P4qj4AFIUq4R6G3x2vtHEOE0K2Pi5tec++ozdpO3fv U4t4RBtrsdKPihs6J7FHtsc763b6Y+MRu1+SmSBrk50JRWUBi/ouyFxIMpZdpU0EpF FAKz6jIwja4xBNuRKwzV/yZTfiifZKRXMveYOokQ= Received: from smtp6.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp6.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 7B94A1640509; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:44:00 +0400 (MSK) Received: from unknown (unknown [178.76.224.133]) by smtp6.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id i0Gubde6-i0GuJJii; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:44:00 +0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1333183440; bh=1W09GtU5earToApyr2sSnk5BD2Uam0XEFRadbCjRHQc=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=J03iy0JwAzrr4jnCnkBNiKNa/Zbw5QZ+u6Q7+tgOTI1VaNxvZvLp7+y3a8nHoCiiy K1MSqJcYmun8I/UdN8+Iaf73RGNvp1EQP26OlBROZLevKY6PmOn2VAUZsNB1kAmL8F P6Oyfj70YUAmRINiSn4SnBF7r/TMmTiYMbSewXFE= Message-ID: <4F76C3B7.5010305@yandex.ru> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:43:35 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthias Andree References: <4F76ABE6.206@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F76ABE6.206@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: rawtherapee 4.0.7 build failure on 9-STABLE amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:44:02 -0000 Matthias Andree wrote on 31.03.2012 11:01: > Ruslan, > > I cannot build rawtherapee 4.0.7 on 9-STABLE amd64, > re-running it after failure with "make MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes" yields: [...] > math.h line 239 declares "double log2(double);", so I presume that > patch-rtengine_improcfun.h proves harmful here; the "#ifndef log2(x)" is > bogus if log2 isn't declared as macro (and is actually what breaks the > compile), and the macro is #define log2(x) ((log(x)/log(2)). > > It might be more useful to do this instead: > > static const double lnOf2 = log(2); > static inline double log2(double x) { return log(x)/lnOf2; } > > or possibly checking math.h for log2() before adding the patch. > > I'm afraid I won't have the time to do that now; could you? > > Thanks. > > Best, > Matthias > > Should be fixed now. That was a last minute change when I realize that it doesn't build on 8.2. I didn't rechecked it on 9/10 after the fix was applied. Apologies and thanks for the hands up. Btw, it builds fine to me on -current amd64 with MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes, should I add this knob to Makefile? -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 31 09:23:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FF1106564A for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:23:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024478FC15 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:23:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (89.112.15.178.pppoe.eltel.net [89.112.15.178]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DFF4C4AC33 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:23:49 +0400 (MSK) Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:23:43 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1265284512.20120331132343@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Strange behavior of ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL}: it trys only one mirror and then fallback to ${MASTER_SITE_BACKUP} X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:23:51 -0000 Hello, Ports. I'm trying to put Subversion Book files to MASTER_SITE_LOCAL, to avoid problem when publisher re-roll files without changing names. It works, file on ftp.freebsd.org (local-distfiles/lev). But when I try check if everything Ok, I get: =3D> svn-book-html-r4259.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/home/lev/dis= tfiles/subversion17. =3D> Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.cn.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/local-d= istfiles/lev/svn-book-html-r4259.tar.bz2 fetch: ftp://ftp.cn.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/local-distfiles/lev/svn-b= ook-html-r4259.tar.bz2: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) =3D> Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/= subversion17/svn-book-html-r4259.tar.bz2 fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/subversion17/svn-b= ook-html-r4259.tar.bz2: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) =3D> Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this =3D> port manually into /usr/home/lev/distfiles/subversion17 and try again. So, ports try only last mirror in list (which is not updated yet) and fallback not to next mirror (and next, and next, till it download it from main site) but to ${MASTER_SITE_BACKUP}. Is it Ok? --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 31 15:27:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27BA106566B; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:27:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org) Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.49.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BF48FC08; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7A2275C45; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:27:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:27:09 -0400 From: Wesley Shields To: Jason Helfman Message-ID: <20120331152709.GA41164@atarininja.org> References: <20120329184921.GA2021@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <4F74BC4F.70801@FreeBSD.org> <20120329204016.GT82505@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <20120330131816.GB30070@atarininja.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Gabor Kovesdan , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: post-deinstall target is invalid X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:27:16 -0000 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 09:14:02PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 01:40:16PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 09:47:27PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan thus spake: > >> >On 2012.03.29. 20:49, Jason Helfman wrote: > >> >> I will work on a effort, as well, to get some supporting > >> documentation > >> >> into > >> >> the Porter's Handbook. > >> >Jason, thanks for this cleanup work. Have you checked if there is any > >> >portlint check for this? It would also be very valuable. > >> > > >> >Gabor > >> > > >> Your welcome, and thanks. > >> > >> I did consider it, however it was also noted to me that portlint > >> shouldn't > >> take the place of poor port coding. That doesn't mean it can't be done, > >> but > >> I also tend to agree with this. Perhaps adding logic to bpm would be a > >> good > >> way to wrap it up, as well. > > > > I'm not sure we should add anything to bpm. It's a legitimate name of a > > custom target which maintainers can use if they want. We should be > > vigilant of code which assumes it will be called though, but there's > > nothing wrong with it being a custom target that the maintainer wants > > for one reason or another. > > > > -- WXS > > > > > I don't completely disagree, however the target is never used, and in all > cases it merely performed the actions that were already being done in a > pkg-deinstall script, or the action wasn't done due to an assumption that > the target was valid. My comment was about adding code to bsd.port.mk. Removing the dead code that was already in the tree was the right thing to do, thank you. -- WXS From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 31 18:20:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040821065675; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:20:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@e-e.com) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.pub.dw.redsrci.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD428FC17; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF5C700E3C; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:20:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=e-e.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :user-agent:from:from:subject:subject:date:date:references :in-reply-to:message-id:received:received:received; s=ee; t= 1333218038; x=1335032438; bh=78Ra81j+KJHD8Lh9mbgFZZe/LG06xVrn2/d k1wLgArI=; b=RVfc9S/KeWcvh2CL0RrD8Vsatw2ozdtd83qNDldfkfXu9F6+vaj yI0Eh5wPecrwwplSfV5tBPJntw9yYVAbbIcKS5JTiYahpzG793F7DYIDqu6xQXFM he0brjScRQVApCkSqR9noQCJyUz7Dlj7jpSSKnE9/DDSOePrRue6dVZs= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.dw.redsrci.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x0C8prjLwhCc; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:20:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A55700B3F; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:20:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 76.251.118.198 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhelfman) by mail.experts-exchange.com with HTTP; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:20:38 -0700 Message-ID: <00f1898c7159ab0c7a7901c1e40aee3e.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> In-Reply-To: <1265284512.20120331132343@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <1265284512.20120331132343@serebryakov.spb.ru> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:20:38 -0700 From: "Jason Helfman" To: lev@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange behavior of ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL}: it trys only one mirror and then fallback to ${MASTER_SITE_BACKUP} X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:20:39 -0000 > Hello, Ports. > > I'm trying to put Subversion Book files to MASTER_SITE_LOCAL, to > avoid problem when publisher re-roll files without changing names. > > It works, file on ftp.freebsd.org (local-distfiles/lev). > > But when I try check if everything Ok, I get: > > => svn-book-html-r4259.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in > /usr/home/lev/distfiles/subversion17. > => Attempting to fetch > ftp://ftp.cn.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/local-distfiles/lev/svn-book-html-r4259.tar.bz2 > fetch: > ftp://ftp.cn.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/local-distfiles/lev/svn-book-html-r4259.tar.bz2: > File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) > => Attempting to fetch > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/subversion17/svn-book-html-r4259.tar.bz2 > fetch: > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/subversion17/svn-book-html-r4259.tar.bz2: > File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) > => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this > => port manually into /usr/home/lev/distfiles/subversion17 and try again. > > So, ports try only last mirror in list (which is not updated yet) > and fallback not to next mirror (and next, and next, till it download > it from main site) but to ${MASTER_SITE_BACKUP}. Is it Ok? > > I had the same issue when I took over daemontools. It needs time to propagate the mirror system. -jgh From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 31 18:44:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6020D106564A; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:44:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D588FC08; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2VIiXW2029077; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:44:33 GMT (envelope-from nox@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from nox@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2VIiXUL029076; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:44:33 GMT (envelope-from nox) From: Juergen Lock Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:44:33 +0000 To: multimedia@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120331184433.GA20967@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: vdr 1.7.27 again; mail issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:44:33 -0000 First: If someone of you tried to email me, the mailserver I'm normally using seems to have a hardware failure, fixing that may take a little while longer, it happened right at the beginning of the weekend... :) So please use my nox at FreeBSD.org email address for now. And re. vdr 1.7.27, I have updated the shar a bit in the meantime, latest version here: http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/vdr-ports-1.7.27-004.shar Thanx! Juergen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 31 19:34:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE5B1065672; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:34:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A7E8FC14; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (89.112.15.178.pppoe.eltel.net [89.112.15.178]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5F7534AC1C; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 23:34:13 +0400 (MSK) Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 23:34:06 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD Project X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <43685403.20120331233406@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: "Jason Helfman" In-Reply-To: <00f1898c7159ab0c7a7901c1e40aee3e.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> References: <1265284512.20120331132343@serebryakov.spb.ru> <00f1898c7159ab0c7a7901c1e40aee3e.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ports@freebsd.org, lev@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Strange behavior of ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL}: it trys only one mirror and then fallback to ${MASTER_SITE_BACKUP} X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:34:21 -0000 Hello, Jason. You wrote 31 =EC=E0=F0=F2=E0 2012 =E3., 22:20:38: >> =3D> svn-book-html-r4259.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in >> /usr/home/lev/distfiles/subversion17. >> =3D> Attempting to fetch >> ftp://ftp.cn.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/local-distfiles/lev/svn-book-= html-r4259.tar.bz2 >> fetch: >> ftp://ftp.cn.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/local-distfiles/lev/svn-book-= html-r4259.tar.bz2: >> File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) >> =3D> Attempting to fetch >> ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/subversion17/svn-book-= html-r4259.tar.bz2 >> fetch: >> ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/subversion17/svn-book-= html-r4259.tar.bz2: >> File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) >> =3D> Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this >> =3D> port manually into /usr/home/lev/distfiles/subversion17 and try aga= in. >> >> So, ports try only last mirror in list (which is not updated yet) >> and fallback not to next mirror (and next, and next, till it download >> it from main site) but to ${MASTER_SITE_BACKUP}. Is it Ok? >> > I had the same issue when I took over daemontools. It needs time to > propagate the mirror system. I understand about mirrors, question is WHY system trys only ONE mirror? --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 31 19:47:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276A9106564A; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:47:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@e-e.com) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.pub.dw.redsrci.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13978FC15; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4EF6EF7F4; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:47:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=e-e.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :user-agent:from:from:subject:subject:date:date:references :in-reply-to:message-id:received:received:received; s=ee; t= 1333223268; x=1335037668; bh=UuPBc14Byj0mwtdvGQuiXpsILguxtm2koHL ga+qigx0=; b=Q4IYPBcUmciWrYr/hDBppmi/7wO7coD97dbRMUCNYy8JS0b5JXo gkka9PR7+KjWOn+tMT0E0tvrcmUhvK+BjnJ4Poe1J1JA2XVdLD4xwAjdDQUphcDr srkLUCXeFNt40lrt0OkiA56UquHK8R5foaO36wYX+iOrAOSmqSRSY/hM= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.dw.redsrci.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Be-Rto7-85+T; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:47:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4D66EE73F; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:47:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 76.251.118.198 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhelfman) by mail.experts-exchange.com with HTTP; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:47:48 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <43685403.20120331233406@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <1265284512.20120331132343@serebryakov.spb.ru> <00f1898c7159ab0c7a7901c1e40aee3e.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> <43685403.20120331233406@serebryakov.spb.ru> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:47:48 -0700 From: "Jason Helfman" To: lev@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange behavior of ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL}: it trys only one mirror and then fallback to ${MASTER_SITE_BACKUP} X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:47:49 -0000 > Hello, Jason. > You wrote 31 марта 2012 г., 22:20:38: > >>> => svn-book-html-r4259.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in >>> /usr/home/lev/distfiles/subversion17. >>> => Attempting to fetch >>> ftp://ftp.cn.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/local-distfiles/lev/svn-book-html-r4259.tar.bz2 >>> fetch: >>> ftp://ftp.cn.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/local-distfiles/lev/svn-book-html-r4259.tar.bz2: >>> File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) >>> => Attempting to fetch >>> ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/subversion17/svn-book-html-r4259.tar.bz2 >>> fetch: >>> ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/subversion17/svn-book-html-r4259.tar.bz2: >>> File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) >>> => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this >>> => port manually into /usr/home/lev/distfiles/subversion17 and try >>> again. >>> >>> So, ports try only last mirror in list (which is not updated yet) >>> and fallback not to next mirror (and next, and next, till it download >>> it from main site) but to ${MASTER_SITE_BACKUP}. Is it Ok? >>> >> I had the same issue when I took over daemontools. It needs time to >> propagate the mirror system. > I understand about mirrors, question is WHY system trys only ONE > mirror? Ah. I see now. That is odd. Haven't come across this issue yet. -jgh From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 31 20:23:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B907106564A for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:23:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9698FC15 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:23:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (89.112.15.178.pppoe.eltel.net [89.112.15.178]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 662BD4AC1C for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 00:23:48 +0400 (MSK) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 00:23:41 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1011966503.20120401002341@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: ports@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <1265284512.20120331132343@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <1265284512.20120331132343@serebryakov.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Soleved: Strange behavior of ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL}: it trys only one mirror and then fallback to ${MASTER_SITE_BACKUP} X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:23:49 -0000 Hello, Ports. You wrote 31 =EC=E0=F0=F2=E0 2012 =E3., 13:23:43: > So, ports try only last mirror in list (which is not updated yet) > and fallback not to next mirror (and next, and next, till it download > it from main site) but to ${MASTER_SITE_BACKUP}. Is it Ok? It is due to group (:group) added, which was added only to last mirror in list, of course. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov