From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 8 01:25:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699B5106566B; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 01:25:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44BAB8FC08; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 01:25:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 059EE56205; Sat, 7 Apr 2012 20:25:58 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 20:25:58 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Jason Helfman Message-ID: <20120408012557.GB12126@lonesome.com> References: <4F809513.9090600@passap.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Chris Rees , Scot Hetzel , Boris Samorodov , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 01:25:58 -0000 portmgr's policy is to honor removal requests, no matter the circumstances. If someone wants to fork the last free release and host it somewhere, I would be less concerned in that case. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 8 08:23:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68909106564A for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 08:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8D848FC14 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 08:23:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Apr 2012 08:23:45 -0000 Received: from g230105221.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO mandree.no-ip.org) [92.230.105.221] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 08 Apr 2012 10:23:45 +0200 X-Authenticated: #428038 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/bOydx5Lbb94X2pGna6BPpyCbN5T+y5wV/Appezm 3ZClbyUL2iRKP7 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4758923CF4E for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 10:23:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4F814B10.3010109@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 10:23:44 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120313 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20120404065640.177c6b73@scorpio> <20348.13284.963931.392595@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20120404082712.26acc4b2@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120404082712.26acc4b2@scorpio> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: Updating GnuTLS to latest version X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 08:23:53 -0000 Am 04.04.2012 14:27, schrieb Jerry: > On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 07:43:32 -0400 > Robert Huff articulated: > >> >> Jerry writes: >> >>> GnuTLS v3.0.18 was released on 2012-04-02. The latest port's >>> versions are "gnutls-2.12.18" and "gnutls-devel-2.99.4" >>> respectively. >>> >>> GnuTLS v3.0.18 is considered the latest stable build by the >>> authors. Are there any plans to update the ports system to this >>> version. In addition, since the port's "gnutls-devel-2.99.4" >>> version is really not the latest experimental version any longer, >>> shouldn't it be removed to avoid any confusion? >> >> Looking at the list of ports down-stream, I suspect this will >> require substantial testing before any upgrade is puvlished. And >> that doesn't count ports that may simply be unable to use it. > > The answer then is to simply do what has been done with other ports > that have numerous major version numbers; i.e. Bash, MySQL, etcetera. > Create a GnuTLS-2 and a GnuTLS-3 port and maintain the latest versions > in each respective port. In fact, it is probably the only logical way > to maintain this port correctly. Perhaps even creating a > "GNUTLS_DEFAULT_VERSION=3" directive for the "/etc/make.conf" file. > There are definitely numerous ways to handle this problem. Yes, there are. However, we're currently in a state of feature freeze, where we shall not be making any potentially disruptive and/or sweeping changes like those if it can be helped. I suggest that you read the porter's handbook, create the necessary changes, test them, revise them, and when they're good, submit them. Chances are that by that time, the feature freeze will have been lifted so we can go forward. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 8 11:34:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0494106564A; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 11:34:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@passap.ru) Received: from forward14.mail.yandex.net (forward14.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CC58FC0A; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 11:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (smtp12.mail.yandex.net [95.108.131.191]) by forward14.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id B2ABD19810E7; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:34:31 +0400 (MSK) Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 6C96A16A04AF; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:34:31 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 46.38.39.187.tel.ru (46.38.39.187.tel.ru [46.38.39.187]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id YU1WwmnP-YU1WaoF6; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:34:30 +0400 Message-ID: <4F8177C6.2070401@passap.ru> Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 15:34:30 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111114 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: <4F809513.9090600@passap.ru> <20120408012557.GB12126@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20120408012557.GB12126@lonesome.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:34:49 +0000 Cc: Chris Rees , Scot Hetzel , Jason Helfman , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 11:34:33 -0000 08.04.2012 05:25, Mark Linimon пишет: > portmgr's policy is to honor removal requests, no matter the circumstances. > If someone wants to fork the last free release and host it somewhere, I > would be less concerned in that case. Yes, It's just what I think: As the maintainer of the port I should remove it under the author's request. If someone create a fork then the port may be restored from attick. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 8 13:51:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8668F106566B; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 13:51:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.tsatsenko@gmail.com) Received: from mx.tsatsenko.ru (y7nz.x.rootbsd.net [204.109.61.86]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E76A8FC0A; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 13:51:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hm1.bsdroot.ru ([92.255.201.25] helo=[192.168.0.7]) by mx.tsatsenko.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1SGsWg-000GGF-UG; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 17:51:31 +0400 Message-ID: <4F8197DF.9060701@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 17:51:27 +0400 From: Mikhail Tsatsenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: <4F809513.9090600@passap.ru> <20120408012557.GB12126@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20120408012557.GB12126@lonesome.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chris Rees , Scot Hetzel , Boris Samorodov , Jason Helfman , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:51:39 -0000 On 08.04.2012 05:25, Mark Linimon wrote: > portmgr's policy is to honor removal requests, no matter the circumstances. > If someone wants to fork the last free release and host it somewhere, I > would be less concerned in that case. > > mcl I'd like to create a fork, but I didn't find last distfile anywhere. Author removed it from his website and ftp.FreeBSD.org hosts only previous version 1.133. Does anybody have 1.135 distfile? -- Milhail From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 8 13:58:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E825106564A; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 13:58:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B448FC0A; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 13:58:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so6598296iah.13 for ; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 06:58:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=C2OH8q2Z+GjPEVzLE8irsFW+uIzQ0o9EdiQZWlc5kHw=; b=J6AcdjXXTJiTY37WwVX8Oh9zoeehGNbbEppMtykt9+/Jk7bJ1b8GAMZeJ+3pxQ6jff SHJxrFIAMro53C3kshriN3CT+d+4l6RuQdK6HXNAaY1EZ5vhIE7Ppw9B9n+J6jMkBlYL 8XxeuLzZ5RShKCMkN7PP5MwVu+7iqU2hzGrfzORba6lvRSR/B8VGcqIdAo3WTYM2uGBx YT6HvtkYt9I/pqcNSKjt7t3zJLacTI/85hhcO5E4zNFd6kCY6tdO6vqC7xC/+g2pL0P2 PXKKw+MHQRDX96bsOBUUHF/vyY6AdeAw5VzQdQS65hpLtoW0bfLegNviOEfwOyEsZzbA 50KA== Received: by 10.50.181.194 with SMTP id dy2mr2742725igc.48.1333893511721; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 06:58:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from luna.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com. [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cg9sm27193121igb.17.2012.04.08.06.58.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 08 Apr 2012 06:58:31 -0700 (PDT) From: ajtiM To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 08:58:21 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-RELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201204080858.21327.lumiwa@gmail.com> Subject: texinfo X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:58:33 -0000 I tried to update /print/texinfo on FreeBSD 9.0 Release and I got: ===>>> Starting build for print/texinfo <<<=== ===>>> All dependencies are up to date ===> Cleaning for texinfo-4.13.20120406 ===>>> Waiting on fetch & checksum for print/texinfo <<<=== ===>>> Waiting on fetch & checksum for print/texinfo <<<=== are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/texinfo. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/texinfo. ===> Deleting distfiles for texinfo-4.13.20120406 make: don't know how to make texinfo.tex. Stop ===>>> Waiting on fetch & checksum for print/texinfo <<<=== ===> Deleting distfiles for texinfo-4.13.20120406 make: don't know how to make texinfo.tex. Stop ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE => texinfo-4.13.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//. => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo-4.13.tar.gz texinfo-4.13.tar.gz 2686 kB 735 kBps => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo-4.13.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo.tex. => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texi2dvi. ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: texi2dvi ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE ===> Extracting for texinfo-4.13.20120406 => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo-4.13.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo.tex. => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texi2dvi. ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: texi2dvi ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE => texi2dvi doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//. => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi fetch: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: Requested Range Not Satisfiable => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo-4.13.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo.tex. => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texi2dvi. ===> Giving up on fetching files: texi2dvi Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/usr/ports/print/texinfo/distinfo) are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/texinfo. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/texinfo. ===>>> make failed for print/texinfo ===>>> Aborting update Terminated Terminated Thanks in advance. Mitja -------- http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 8 14:45:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B21106564A; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 14:45:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E158FC08; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 14:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so3712060bkc.13 for ; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 07:45:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=j/xxDAzbj8euPvmmhuctnTyLtpjui6UIBeL8rk7jO8A=; b=hOts5jHH8In/mqw20ej/KjaJgGBrkK8l/n097JwOzWSrL6o8X1D9Xd8xC6QsHbPBZ/ YwiL3cHEjWPyXvUt0/U/8oh3jMGBNGfSlMoZYRY3w6vcBxWJliojBXgCvOgMVnNbcHTP ZFqvWsOlLstIlyk3zAWFW/T9iBnlSK2Mc30C0rBIA33Tk4Ql7u28x1FjkBBao4cZ0MF1 rrCRGEntXJYGxAzvoFqpcr00bvw/QTVXg8Qvx0QZM0xC0HCxJ4hN874fxRW+QAvHRzrv JbfrwX+i7LOtLzRdvRKUvxfoKkOLdwkEtRW6d/0uP0CWWUkXHConj2GT7RtBALGcTihb tWLw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.150.86 with SMTP id x22mr1903083bkv.136.1333896314936; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 07:45:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 07:45:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 07:45:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F8197DF.9060701@gmail.com> References: <4F809513.9090600@passap.ru> <20120408012557.GB12126@lonesome.com> <4F8197DF.9060701@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:45:14 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: bHwAt1YpBJYvIuuFNsCtntfzJ3U Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Mikhail Tsatsenko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Mark Linimon , Scot Hetzel , Boris Samorodov , Jason Helfman , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 14:45:17 -0000 On 8 Apr 2012 14:51, "Mikhail Tsatsenko" wrote: > > On 08.04.2012 05:25, Mark Linimon wrote: >> >> portmgr's policy is to honor removal requests, no matter the circumstances. >> If someone wants to fork the last free release and host it somewhere, I >> would be less concerned in that case. >> >> mcl > > I'd like to create a fork, but I didn't find last distfile anywhere. Author removed it from his website and ftp.FreeBSD.org hosts only previous version 1.133. > Does anybody have 1.135 distfile? > You might have luck with a Debian mirror, and there's always inurl: Googling. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 8 15:14:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF028106566C for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:14:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3D98FC08 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so6664140iah.13 for ; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 08:14:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=mV7jlMYoDm3eMilA9PTRb1zWY3il/9VFfyaLPOCOa6s=; b=pbiYHC0+DN6JlczyGEOpRrRdmESytTwNmuni6qKTaszuJ3phdMpMrMt/r1w1U5V29x l+gnFC8eZkpLMyLHva4thTBB0lvj7BRzQwNEVK51eyS/dHL/KYIsfiPCfotINzQRgHOA gXjP+Ogl+IDEAn2r9fGpOKt40kSIciw1OMmGy7X8x34wY0arAr8hOk8IEvdSVYamqOfs 5TTXlLu3poZWWazzIxPqe8umqHrGiMgd9nNko/fpbkrwKhEc2cUDCjAEGgN3yzzEuDy3 BifNTr8F7YcH/yRb5P0oLAt69NUHqKzXBSESb/mkqBMHYTzmqeyLNTPp+SpYjBjSU+3m okyw== Received: by 10.50.57.129 with SMTP id i1mr2897971igq.33.1333898062714; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 08:14:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from luna.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com. [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id wf10sm11884010igb.8.2012.04.08.08.14.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 08 Apr 2012 08:14:22 -0700 (PDT) From: ajtiM To: Rainer Hurling Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 10:14:13 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-RELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; i386; ; ) References: <201204080858.21327.lumiwa@gmail.com> <4F819EFF.60000@gwdg.de> In-Reply-To: <4F819EFF.60000@gwdg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201204081014.13852.lumiwa@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: texinfo X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 15:14:23 -0000 On Sunday 08 April 2012 09:21:51 Rainer Hurling wrote: > On 08.04.2012 15:58 (UTC+1), ajtiM wrote: > > I tried to update /print/texinfo on FreeBSD 9.0 Release and I got: > > > > ===>>> Starting build for print/texinfo<<<=== > > > > ===>>> All dependencies are up to date > > > > ===> Cleaning for texinfo-4.13.20120406 > > > > ===>>> Waiting on fetch& checksum for print/texinfo<<<=== > > > > > > ===>>> Waiting on fetch& checksum for print/texinfo<<<=== > > are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this > > check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/print/texinfo. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/print/texinfo. > > ===> Deleting distfiles for texinfo-4.13.20120406 > > make: don't know how to make texinfo.tex. Stop > > > > > > ===>>> Waiting on fetch& checksum for print/texinfo<<<=== > > ===> Deleting distfiles for texinfo-4.13.20120406 > > make: don't know how to make texinfo.tex. Stop > > ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > > => texinfo-4.13.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//. > > => Attempting to fetch > > http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo-4.13.tar.gz texinfo-4.13.tar.gz > > 2686 kB 735 kBps => SHA256 Checksum OK > > for texinfo-4.13.tar.gz. > > => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo.tex. > > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texi2dvi. > > ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: texi2dvi > > > > > > ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > > ===> Extracting for texinfo-4.13.20120406 > > => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo-4.13.tar.gz. > > => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo.tex. > > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texi2dvi. > > ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: texi2dvi > > ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > > => texi2dvi doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//. > > => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi > > fetch: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: Requested Range Not > > Satisfiable => Attempting to fetch > > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi > > ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > > => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo-4.13.tar.gz. > > => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo.tex. > > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texi2dvi. > > ===> Giving up on fetching files: texi2dvi > > Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file > > (/usr/ports/print/texinfo/distinfo) are up to date. If you are > > absolutely sure you want to override this check, type "make > > NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/print/texinfo. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/print/texinfo. > > > > ===>>> make failed for print/texinfo > > ===>>> Aborting update > > > > Terminated > > Terminated > > Removing the old distfiles does help for me. > > > Thanks in advance. > > Mitja > > -------- > > http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa It not works for me. Mitja -------- http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 8 15:23:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F981065670 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:23:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from fmailer.gwdg.de (fmailer.gwdg.de [134.76.11.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC4F8FC14 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from p5dc3f85e.dip.t-dialin.net ([93.195.248.94] helo=krabat.raven.hur) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SGt07-0002CJ-6K; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 16:21:55 +0200 Message-ID: <4F819EFF.60000@gwdg.de> Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 16:21:51 +0200 From: Rainer Hurling User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120317 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ajtiM References: <201204080858.21327.lumiwa@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201204080858.21327.lumiwa@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated: Id:rhurlin X-Spam-Level: - X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by exiscan+sophie Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: texinfo X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 15:23:58 -0000 On 08.04.2012 15:58 (UTC+1), ajtiM wrote: > I tried to update /print/texinfo on FreeBSD 9.0 Release and I got: > > ===>>> Starting build for print/texinfo<<<=== > > ===>>> All dependencies are up to date > > ===> Cleaning for texinfo-4.13.20120406 > > ===>>> Waiting on fetch& checksum for print/texinfo<<<=== > > > ===>>> Waiting on fetch& checksum for print/texinfo<<<=== > are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this > check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/print/texinfo. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/print/texinfo. > ===> Deleting distfiles for texinfo-4.13.20120406 > make: don't know how to make texinfo.tex. Stop > > > ===>>> Waiting on fetch& checksum for print/texinfo<<<=== > ===> Deleting distfiles for texinfo-4.13.20120406 > make: don't know how to make texinfo.tex. Stop > ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > => texinfo-4.13.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//. > => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo-4.13.tar.gz > texinfo-4.13.tar.gz 2686 kB 735 kBps > => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo-4.13.tar.gz. > => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo.tex. > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texi2dvi. > ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: texi2dvi > > > ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > ===> Extracting for texinfo-4.13.20120406 > => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo-4.13.tar.gz. > => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo.tex. > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texi2dvi. > ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: texi2dvi > ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > => texi2dvi doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//. > => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi > fetch: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: Requested Range Not Satisfiable > => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi > ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo-4.13.tar.gz. > => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo.tex. > => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texi2dvi. > ===> Giving up on fetching files: texi2dvi > Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/usr/ports/print/texinfo/distinfo) > are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this > check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/print/texinfo. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/print/texinfo. > > ===>>> make failed for print/texinfo > ===>>> Aborting update > > Terminated > Terminated Removing the old distfiles does help for me. > Thanks in advance. > Mitja > -------- > http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 8 15:28:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F3E1065670; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:28:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.tsatsenko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5684F8FC0A; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbcwz17 with SMTP id wz17so4277747pbc.13 for ; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 08:28:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=F4yoNfjBJo70N1mZCyVD76df6Z4GqCB1uDKZZqYbHK8=; b=fESegZeYg7q15WnXp3QdqVozwBb7+/zjaorciJONMZVAj0EUPmuCmbL33mi19toK+9 roTpV8+QU+hUivSPfKBFrIBDivrD7SN6/fJCoBpuUgNuAcu7o4rz6DctKRLl8GNbdLuE hLtaupVBXGPSO5wy/Mh+dtNr4zOPq2TKOr93C8VujAt6g3DOjDpQOyaj8LwrBWA6iqUu 9c+f3rPKpfRYAtTPgqOB9Nw0QPQsAvosQU6/pUwSuwryAPLSrvcs9DaK+D53Pdzb87yv 9G+76TL0wJnf2P7tZqFh9ZVleiCn8W09nlfnVexG/dTazspu49+jX3+6cYvUcQn4VfzM 4MHw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.132.101 with SMTP id ot5mr12264599pbb.103.1333898902933; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 08:28:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.226.7 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 08:28:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4F809513.9090600@passap.ru> <20120408012557.GB12126@lonesome.com> <4F8197DF.9060701@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 19:28:20 +0400 Message-ID: From: Mikhail Tsatsenko To: Chris Rees Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=047d7b15a677468f3204bd2c8aa3 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Mark Linimon , Scot Hetzel , Boris Samorodov , Jason Helfman , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 15:28:23 -0000 --047d7b15a677468f3204bd2c8aa3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > You might have luck with a Debian mirror, and there's always inurl: I have tried it already, but had no luck. Currently I created a fork of 1.133 version (named imaputils to avoid name collision with original software). Can anybody having ports commit bit import it in the ports tree, please. In case if somebody will provide most recent free version of imaptools I'll submit an update. -- Mikhail --047d7b15a677468f3204bd2c8aa3-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 8 16:04:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C4D106566B for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 16:04:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward11.mail.yandex.net (forward11.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 512208FC0C for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 16:04:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp13.mail.yandex.net (smtp13.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.68]) by forward11.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 9E322E81640; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 20:04:32 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1333901072; bh=BIGtejdpoFgDuSn4CEp2pAQgl9rmrCQCzw+wZZCIudM=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=flLGUu3sUWCtYC3NQcZgtSDd9uqN9nEj6PLaIKYhyi/Z2GesrUXhIjPPYdfJ2nVTs JT+VTFGKkHh82RY69hKu8HrEC1vx3PAnYjhk7jB1itS+XPgQwkKoezb5+WiT8dw4Fi 6BQCuOnudUrlnyoIAdsxT6GAwoBldW4PvriIjADU= Received: from smtp13.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp13.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 80106E40502; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 20:04:32 +0400 (MSK) Received: from unknown (unknown [178.76.224.133]) by smtp13.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id 4VBK4kj0-4WBWYMqN; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 20:04:32 +0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1333901072; bh=BIGtejdpoFgDuSn4CEp2pAQgl9rmrCQCzw+wZZCIudM=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=EXFnDZTklfuyXm8IPZ2EGR8rhy415aeF7k4ilF7ku/nefQbdlOGxz9H32BNJFGxDp vlnw1NxsIrGBsXBqxKWFJdA8MjZvgYnaFu/SK5IossdZia5Aaw4rjK5DjBPJXYsv7R CJ9Usjc4/6t+aigIhyJ18W8pQeE2Z0HiAiK2rBRw= Message-ID: <4F81B6EF.5010207@yandex.ru> Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 20:03:59 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ajtiM References: <201204080858.21327.lumiwa@gmail.com> <4F819EFF.60000@gwdg.de> <201204081014.13852.lumiwa@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201204081014.13852.lumiwa@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: texinfo X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 16:04:35 -0000 ajtiM wrote on 08.04.2012 19:14: > On Sunday 08 April 2012 09:21:51 Rainer Hurling wrote: >> On 08.04.2012 15:58 (UTC+1), ajtiM wrote: >>> I tried to update /print/texinfo on FreeBSD 9.0 Release and I got: >>> >>> ===>>> Starting build for print/texinfo<<<=== >>> >>> ===>>> All dependencies are up to date >>> >>> ===> Cleaning for texinfo-4.13.20120406 >>> >>> ===>>> Waiting on fetch& checksum for print/texinfo<<<=== >>> >>> >>> ===>>> Waiting on fetch& checksum for print/texinfo<<<=== >>> are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this >>> check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop in /usr/ports/print/texinfo. >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop in /usr/ports/print/texinfo. >>> ===> Deleting distfiles for texinfo-4.13.20120406 >>> make: don't know how to make texinfo.tex. Stop >>> >>> >>> ===>>> Waiting on fetch& checksum for print/texinfo<<<=== >>> ===> Deleting distfiles for texinfo-4.13.20120406 >>> make: don't know how to make texinfo.tex. Stop >>> ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE >>> => texinfo-4.13.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//. >>> => Attempting to fetch >>> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texinfo-4.13.tar.gz texinfo-4.13.tar.gz >>> 2686 kB 735 kBps => SHA256 Checksum OK >>> for texinfo-4.13.tar.gz. >>> => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo.tex. >>> => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texi2dvi. >>> ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: texi2dvi >>> >>> >>> ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE >>> ===> Extracting for texinfo-4.13.20120406 >>> => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo-4.13.tar.gz. >>> => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo.tex. >>> => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texi2dvi. >>> ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: texi2dvi >>> ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE >>> => texi2dvi doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles//. >>> => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi >>> fetch: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi: Requested Range Not >>> Satisfiable => Attempting to fetch >>> ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo/texi2dvi >>> ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE >>> => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo-4.13.tar.gz. >>> => SHA256 Checksum OK for texinfo.tex. >>> => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for texi2dvi. >>> ===> Giving up on fetching files: texi2dvi >>> Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file >>> (/usr/ports/print/texinfo/distinfo) are up to date. If you are >>> absolutely sure you want to override this check, type "make >>> NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop in /usr/ports/print/texinfo. >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop in /usr/ports/print/texinfo. >>> >>> ===>>> make failed for print/texinfo >>> ===>>> Aborting update >>> >>> Terminated >>> Terminated >> >> Removing the old distfiles does help for me. >> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> Mitja >>> -------- >>> http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa > > It not works for me. > > Mitja > -------- > http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa Hi Mitja, I just checked - all is ok with new distfiles. That mismatch error is because you have previously downloaded texi2dvi file in /usr/ports/distfiles. Try to execute `make distclean' in print/tex2dvi and check again - it should work. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 8 16:43:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A472A106564A for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 16:43:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDFB8FC0C for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 16:43:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D58D23C04 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 12:43:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DBB2D23C03 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 12:43:47 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4F81C045.3030301@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 12:43:49 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org> <63ca1b333a310ecc2b1d1f0e1e1542a1.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> <4F7338C3.8020003@p6m7g8.com> <4F733C3A.7020004@missouri.edu> <4F734524.2000400@p6m7g8.com> <4F735340.1020103@FreeBSD.org> <4F7379FD.9040802@p6m7g8.com> <20120329200243.GA76833@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20120330131625.GA30070@atarininja.org> <4F75F3ED.9000508@p6m7g8.com> <4F75FA31.2030806@p6m7g8.com> <4F760FB3.6020708@FreeBSD.org> <4F761921.7030505@p6m7g8.com> <4F7DFAC9.1080806@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F7DFAC9.1080806@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 16:43:54 -0000 On 4/5/12 4:04 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > > On 3/30/12 4:35 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >> o When pkg-plist changes (except for fixing >>> .ifdef/NOPORT(DOCS|EXAMPLES)) >> #1 covers this, this is the OPTIONS case (default vs not) >> > perfect example, real world. > > And, in exactly this situation, I have submitted several pr's without > portrevision bumps, and they have all been committed like that. no > portrevision bump. > (did I mention I didn't commit them? other, more senior members of > the port team, who were the maintainers did?) > > Also, there is this one: waiting for maintainer timeout, > > on pointyhat, package won't change, since pointyhat does not define NOPORT(DOCS|EXAMPLES), so, package does not change. So, for all conditions: ie: we do/don't want pointyhat to rebuild pkg... this would be a noop. if we do/don't think the OP would want to rebuild pkg.. if they don't assign NOPORT*, then its a noop. (and if they are concerned, can rm the files.) and, no, pav is wrong ;-) you don't want to have your port do a rm -rf /usr/local/share. At least two ports that I know of put critical files in there, and, if you do that, the portupgrade/portmaster/make delinstall will squeal to the next system OP that there is something bad wrong, because pkg-plist is wrong, and it can't delete files, can't em dirs, and did not delete the package. anyone important want to commit this pr? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/165820 -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 9 08:14:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2005A1065674; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:14:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6229E8FC1A; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:14:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so4094420bkc.13 for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 01:14:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=F6BKDWT5AQ3Ggb0WR7INHzH1je+W5VNm67GgMJ4HoBg=; b=U193U1+jfQ7+4G2PCkTheflahx4iRkociLOha4WvP8rJpWsawrG+9iOS7aDbwcrNeR zMGziKkTqbcjPyPYhz5JaJGPhV36ShFl8PAuIyO/NQrGkSa0erOpfWTYxi8P6nu8t0xF DDVd0sJOnPyDsx/4GPlI2SLlrg6lkxy7neqBbBYC/EN9WSwaLY5xQRTRtPjl78PH7Ry9 kuOxuKI7Z3Zv0rRyGzO1uKEbvfPKDa3hp1FonM6Lcx8TqE/A2ZMl28yXLWOiwokrl2FC 19gOb+oIiTZ4Nhwv85UjOsz6BqA+Rz4BjCy125hd7sYPry/36otIDOD1H1OkfjYJWogF 6FEQ== Received: by 10.204.128.65 with SMTP id j1mr2754956bks.74.1333959264416; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 01:14:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 01:13:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4F809513.9090600@passap.ru> <20120408012557.GB12126@lonesome.com> <4F8197DF.9060701@gmail.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:13:54 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4UWp3NLpB4uZIn0VDB3zx7Mbst4 Message-ID: To: Mikhail Tsatsenko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Mark Linimon , Scot Hetzel , Boris Samorodov , Jason Helfman , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 08:14:26 -0000 On 8 April 2012 15:28, Mikhail Tsatsenko wrote: >> You might have luck with a Debian mirror, and there's always inurl: > > I have tried it already, but had no luck. Currently I created a fork > of 1.133 version (named imaputils to avoid name collision with > original software). Can anybody having ports commit bit import it in > the ports tree, please. > In case if somebody will provide most recent free version of imaptools > I'll submit an update. > New port added, with minor changes. Thanks! Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 9 08:16:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E111065670; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:16:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.tsatsenko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107628FC12; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:16:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbcwz17 with SMTP id wz17so4831900pbc.13 for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 01:16:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=F9XH8BmKJJSQ+0wNM7xGyNlIgyh9CW7fEM2l1X6QkZM=; b=DQpKWt7hu6ltqVHyyJ3MLAGmnloOVzw1MrrL7XyiV9P11oZAUCxd1PgWRwZFyLSjoG uYT1awy+8PnJ4ZXJ6FvyGx2KQp27SwaAmhaqnHB2dNbsL5jlUkrxaqi8/7nWO1Og4B/c Xw1cOpVIZsUaEQeCaB5QAo9nZ8wHrrgwnOueMpYr1eiEMZFjIPHuxr6h7h87I56BCkyU /gMrfb/QSpHaH2LLrdS4ch1ozIZvsL5rP4Ne7YrlG4+R1aZAMBv38JftLpvm2I0PthGG 8LjEuN76lAufG4z2uYwTRQ9p2wuLXwaWplZ/K7kVU87KUEjxPQX1oOe/p+VC8izOjVv/ zIsw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.220.39 with SMTP id pt7mr17339722pbc.166.1333959377798; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 01:16:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.226.7 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 01:16:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4F809513.9090600@passap.ru> <20120408012557.GB12126@lonesome.com> <4F8197DF.9060701@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 12:16:17 +0400 Message-ID: From: Mikhail Tsatsenko To: Chris Rees Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Mark Linimon , Scot Hetzel , Boris Samorodov , Jason Helfman , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 08:16:18 -0000 > New port added, with minor changes. > > Thanks! > > Chris Thank you There is a PR 166757 which may be closed now. -- Mikhail From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 9 08:20:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 335EF106566B; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:20:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1E68FC12; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:20:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so4097533bkc.13 for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 01:20:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=vjF+xwdsU6sdOPBO8Ehn0FuE+ecb1D0bw0xF3Corhkw=; b=AaGWWNav+086lHbiVGDSQ1LXOmKfhf03b46RiBddLr9cnGO6Mww1wQAVYbkQ0+ixVf 48px4IPyNjbYYUYNE2bf/5CVV6M0BO6GYUUdFibGoSIzQoReQ4xc9iuXWHafk56OgrJw BN5+t6MQ1g3ieaBh1CcgNOgVcFWegrCKWkjRgLs0FWs5rJrjBBeZtj9/dZX2NpbR4OQ7 RLWP/CB+Lv5nA1VzPNw9tbZm8f6J7BoZ2f83AB7fcS6ITtvdsOM6doTelPcMHdBi+P88 d7CEWvOnYwPJGBjevmUAXd6WZvx24cygMjGVhxfClUOf2z69SwtylEs2k6Bel4MkeYvS 07QA== Received: by 10.204.12.10 with SMTP id v10mr2635701bkv.1.1333959631206; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 01:20:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 01:20:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4F809513.9090600@passap.ru> <20120408012557.GB12126@lonesome.com> <4F8197DF.9060701@gmail.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:20:01 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: vUFzPcHvpw86biZBVR4ruYZAsV0 Message-ID: To: Mikhail Tsatsenko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Mark Linimon , Scot Hetzel , Boris Samorodov , Jason Helfman , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 08:20:33 -0000 On 9 April 2012 08:16, Mikhail Tsatsenko wrote: >> New port added, with minor changes. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Chris > Thank you > There is a PR 166757 which may be closed now. Closed, thanks. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 9 08:34:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2287E106566C; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:34:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745D08FC12; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so4105752bkc.13 for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 01:34:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y5VAD1+aELc8jnthULaQaEuarBYEBsw9B33REslyi6w=; b=RS3m9Qrbm7FztL/R/HwsokK6SgJmzskr7Q1LNseWAOLlgimEQ5FEA5jTH8ioFrpYMP BeNFlqKqPVAFOtvYSEeyNQFiBLc0y7pX6HI+1BvqbMR4pVsL+L5A6cOepnKEX/LHlVi6 Cvo/tK16kCTKO2xeMA9VCKOErL8MtVsY6O7gj62RePK7gujo6G0hZKE+pHR//CMOm7qd YK+9zIK/Rt3RzQ3xle9u4OtwmtbZgogycjStfPKFIobpY2c+SD8RHI7s8Bn+d98QSJYS 5DeA1IIS7w3+2AduaFIJu9MMF2fzq6Z6isHAM8uCeF7+HCxEbOtk+mG1Il6LRW11eSQp eeig== Received: by 10.205.117.15 with SMTP id fk15mr2680148bkc.133.1333960481588; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 01:34:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 01:34:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1372520876.20120401212732@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <792848519.20120401165840@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4F785246.60804@freebsd.org> <498407961.20120401205358@serebryakov.spb.ru> <322863489.20120401212236@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1372520876.20120401212732@serebryakov.spb.ru> From: Chris Rees Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:34:11 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: HgEnct1IUoj4TheGuIRDWVLvS-0 Message-ID: To: lev@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BUILD_DEPENDS and libraries -- how to express build-time-only dependency on library? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 08:34:43 -0000 On 1 April 2012 17:27, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Chris. > You wrote 1 =D0=B0=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8F 2012 =D0=B3., 21:22:36: > >>>>>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0Is it possible to express build-time-only dependency on= library? >>>>> BUILD_DEPENDS=3D${LOCALBASE}/lib/libfoo.a:${PORTSDIR}/foo/libfoo ? >>>> =C2=A0It works, but here are other problem: if iconv or gettext or >>>> something like this are used, they added after all libs anyway :( >>> Well, don't iconv and gettext require it? =C2=A0In that case it needs >>> registering. =C2=A0Otherwise iconv and gettext should have their deps >>> fixed.... >> =C2=A0 My port builds with static linkage. After port is built and >> installed, it doesn't need any other ports in system. But if I use >> USE_ICONV, and, later do something like this: > >> OLD_LIB_DEPENDS:=3D >> ${LIB_DEPENDS:S!^!${LOCALBASE}/lib/lib!:C!(\.[0-9]+)?:!.a:!} >> BUILD_DEPENDS+=3D =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 ${OLD_LIB_DEPENDS} >> LIB_DEPENDS=3D >> =C2=A0I have proper BUILD_DEPENDS which is built from MY libraries, but >> iconv, gettext & Ko are in LIB_DEPENDS anyway :( > =C2=A0USE_GETTEXT could be set to "build" but not USE_ICONV and USE_BDB. > And all my manipulations with *_DEPENDS goes before effect of these > options :( I suppose bsd.port.pre.mk doesn't help here, does it? USE_ICONV=3D yes USE_BDB=3D yes .include # mess with dependencies .include From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 9 11:06:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3811065672 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:06:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA89B8FC14 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:06:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q39B68kq038711 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:06:08 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q39B67PC038708 for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:06:07 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:06:07 GMT Message-Id: <201204091106.q39B67PC038708@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: FreeBSD ports list Cc: Subject: Current unassigned ports problem reports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:06:09 -0000 (Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o ports/166782 [MAINTAINER] databases/sqlite3: update to 3.7.11 o ports/166778 revise port: lang/urweb f ports/166777 some warnings with net-mgmt/mrtg o ports/166776 update net-mgmt/mrtg f ports/166768 [maintainer update] math/ess 5.12.8 -> 12.04.00 o ports/166756 [PATCH] databases/cassandra: update to 1.0.9 o ports/166754 [maintainer] [patch] lang/harbour: update to 3.0.0 and f ports/166752 mail/imapsync: update to 1.487 f ports/166749 [PATCH]deskutils/cairo-dock-plugins 2.3.0~3_2 AlsaMixe f ports/166748 [PATCH]deskutils/cairo-dock 2.3.0~3 not sound(Resend) f ports/166747 [PATCH]deskutils/cairo-dock-plugins 2.3.0~3_2 GMenu er o ports/166745 [UPDATE] graphics/mupdf to 1.0rc1 o ports/166743 [UPDATE] x11-fonts/hanazono-fonts-ttf to 20120202 f ports/166733 Update and adopt port: sysutils/condor o ports/166728 New port: science/fvcom-mpi o ports/166726 New port: science/fvcom o ports/166725 New port: science/dlpoly-classic o ports/166722 graphics/ufraw: port fails to build if "GTK" option is o ports/166716 New ports: chinese/fcitx-libpinyin & chinese/libpinyin o ports/166711 New port: japanese/fcitx-mozc - Mozc Japanese input me o ports/166689 [UPDATE] chinese/fcitx and its addons to 4.2.1 o ports/166680 Maintainer update: sysutils/desktop-installer o ports/166670 New Port :converter/libb64 Base64 Encoding/Decoding Ro o ports/166669 [PATCH] mail/roundcube-sieverules: update to 1.16 f ports/166666 sysutils/qjail update -b removes uglyperlhack o ports/166665 java/jboss-as: JBoss 7.1 new port o ports/166662 www/asterisk-stat - pgsql select substring() problem o ports/166661 maintainer update: devel/pysvn o ports/166658 audio/rplay: rplayd crashes on amd64 o ports/166645 emulators/virtio-kmod: rxcsum breaks checksum for loca f ports/166607 [PATCH]deskutils/cairo-dock-plugins 2.3.0~3_2 AlsaMixe f ports/166606 [PATCH]deskutils/cairo-dock 2.3.0~3 not sound o ports/166593 [MAINTAINER] ports-mgmt/porttools: CVS expansion of $F o ports/166587 Maintainer update: sysutils/radmind o ports/166572 New port: deskutils/devd-notifier - a simple daemon f ports/166534 finance/openerp-server, finance/openerp-web: OpenERP m o ports/166522 lang/f77: Fortran 77 compiler always exits with error o ports/166506 www/py-prewikka bug using [auth cgi] o ports/166504 security/prelude-pflogger fails to compile o ports/166438 New port: devel/libarms: library for developing SMFv2/ o ports/166435 Update devel/libedit with local patches f ports/166388 security/libgcrypt is broken o ports/166341 devel/valgrind crash on binaries built with gcc46 f ports/166313 please, update net-mgmt/zabbix-server to 1.8.11 o ports/166275 [new port] sysutils/automount devd(8) based automounte o ports/166248 sendmail dies of signal 11 on freebsd in a virtualbox o ports/166244 [maintainer update] databases/powerarchitect version u o ports/166243 New port databases/jdbc-oracle10g: JDBD driver for Ora o ports/166237 New port: devel/arduino-glcd: A Graphical LCD library o ports/166209 [PATCH] cad/verilog-mode.el port update f ports/166204 Update port: print/reportlab2 Fix fonts search path f ports/166136 [patch] databases/freetds-devel properly link tds modu o ports/166117 add knobs in math/grace to make features selectable an o ports/166058 New port sysutils/py-XenAPI f ports/166055 [patch] x11/fireflies does not build with x11-toolkits o ports/166006 Problem with mail/postfix and mail/mailman integration f ports/166004 www/squid31 3.1.19 crashes on first request o ports/165926 [patch] deskutils/cairo-dock-plugins fix many bugs o ports/165925 [patch] deskutils/cairo-dock fix many bugs f ports/165918 unable to build net-mgmt/zenoss with subversion o ports/165900 [new port] emulators/linux_base-c6 f ports/165899 devel/wand-libconfig and devel/libconfig conflict (sam f ports/165898 deskutils/cairo-dock-plugins 2.3.0~3_2 (The icon effec o ports/165865 New port: devel/pure-stllib: Deprecate pure-stldict & o ports/165842 [maintainer-update] games/ioquake3 and slaves o ports/165799 utmpx fix for japanese/emacs-emcws f ports/165672 sysutils/bacula-server doesn't install all symlinks ne o ports/165586 New port german/lx-office-erp, sql-ledger fork with ex o ports/165361 x11-wm/e17-module-mem counts memory incorrectly s ports/165353 ports-mgmt/portupgrade can't parse date anymore o ports/165337 new port: sysutils/fusefs-mp3fs Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A4B1065670; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 17:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D258FC14; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 17:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBE001.dip.t-dialin.net [217.251.224.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q39HmpkH030247; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 17:48:51 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q39HoHIq053505; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 19:50:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q39HnYsF092884; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 19:49:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201204091749.q39HnYsF092884@fire.js.berklix.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Sat, 07 Apr 2012 20:28:18 -0000." Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:49:34 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: Chris Rees , Mark Linimon , Scot Hetzel , Boris Samorodov Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 17:49:01 -0000 > From: Chris Rees > > Well, whatever he says, he can't revoke the license of what's already > been distributed. > > ############################################################################ > # Copyright (c) 2008 Rick Sanders # > # # > # Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any # > # purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above # > # copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies. # ... Exactly ! > From: Mark Linimon > portmgr's policy is to honor removal requests, no matter the circumstances. ................................................ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Irresponsible. Real 'Managers' shoulder responsibility. So ... In /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, define a warning variable after NO_CDROM, NO_PACKAGE, [ RESTRICTED_FILES ], with example: WARNING+="Generic author tried to retrospectively withdraw sources." # Maintainer suggest see files/... & http://... Allow individual ports Maintainers to indicate status of issues. Allow individual installers to decide their Own take on issues, Not Yours ! - Ports wrappers belong to FreeBSD, not generic authors. - Sources once published can't be unpublished. (IMO No need of a new project & port name to excuse retention). - Distfiles if not on freebsd.org site are not even our problem. portmgr should retain respect by dumping a foolish policy. sticking to technical & avoiding programmers guesses & fears about laws, or assumptions USA law controls global law or whatever else. Stay technical. The globe has 196 countries with their own legal jurisdictions, individual installers should be able to make their own decision on law & risks & morality as localy appropriate. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 9 18:09:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130D8106566C for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 18:09:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853448FC0A for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 18:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so4569452bkc.13 for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:09:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zReJcsbAsqMZUEYh7EZn6I5ofE46QwEhJuc3zoDhci0=; b=IG6TzroeWLhcsce1B+5Vv8J194FLtA2BexcdxKMC8q6PCnLXw4PvlHnSwtnj5IUI/h UESC/BJHca13bbz3eeI7B2SQRwnCs31wvqnlr3sPCtgHLBT8TynjqdJviT65K5Ch/yrH tLR6k0nXYsBSNuiv8xc+zp4x2DzKA4Y2WdtH0Zy5Gemwd+xXwXgh2KMQgAlo6s6c9Tba M67ntdbe+SDI7BCOuP4uN7x1HabHQVe6nDIf6O8ptoOg0xb6Bof9b9WZIT6vPpU9sYTZ 36Cw0CFLCrJmF51UNm4fH+/6UMDhAmsngv6QOaC63yurbo0wqFX53ltpWBaHlncP6VOT pdIA== Received: by 10.205.117.15 with SMTP id fk15mr3370372bkc.133.1333994991138; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:09:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:09:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201204091749.q39HnYsF092884@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <201204091749.q39HnYsF092884@fire.js.berklix.net> From: Chris Rees Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 18:09:20 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: JiiYSjm8ICpbcwkLPLbJu3w1C1c Message-ID: To: "Julian H. Stacey" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Mark Linimon , Scot Hetzel , Boris Samorodov , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 18:09:53 -0000 On 9 April 2012 17:49, Julian H. Stacey wrote: >> From: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Chris Rees >> >> Well, whatever he says, he can't revoke the license of what's already >> been distributed. >> >> ########################################################################= #### >> # Copyright (c) 2008 Rick Sanders =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0# >> # =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0= =A0# >> # Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any = =A0 =A0# >> # purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above= =A0 # >> # copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies. =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0# > > ... > > Exactly ! > > >> From: Mark Linimon > >> portmgr's policy is to honor removal requests, no matter the circumstanc= es. > ................................................ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^= ^^^^ > > > Irresponsible. =A0Real 'Managers' shoulder responsibility. =A0So ... > > In /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, define a warning variable after > NO_CDROM, NO_PACKAGE, [ RESTRICTED_FILES ], with example: > > =A0WARNING+=3D"Generic author tried to retrospectively withdraw sources." > =A0# =A0 =A0 Maintainer suggest see files/... & http://... > > Allow individual ports Maintainers to indicate status of issues. > Allow individual installers to decide their Own take on issues, Not Yours= ! > > - Ports wrappers belong to FreeBSD, not generic authors. > - Sources once published can't be unpublished. > =A0(IMO No need of a new project & port name to excuse retention). > - Distfiles if not on freebsd.org site are not even our problem. > > portmgr should retain respect by dumping a foolish policy. =A0sticking > to technical & avoiding programmers guesses & fears about laws, or > assumptions USA law controls global law or whatever else. Stay > technical. =A0The globe has 196 countries with their own legal > jurisdictions, individual installers should be able to make their > own decision on law & risks & morality as localy appropriate. Hi Julian, I understand your viewpoint, but given the horrible experiences certain people had on this kind of thing (you were around then, too), I think that the 'make a fork and port that instead' is perfectly reasonable. At least then the software has a maintainer. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 9 18:27:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2FF106564A for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 18:27:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DFA8FC17 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 18:27:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 98F8B56209; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 13:27:31 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 13:27:31 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: jhs@berklix.com Message-ID: <20120409182731.GA31438@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <201204091749.q39HnYsF092884@fire.js.berklix.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: "Julian H. Stacey" , Scot Hetzel , Boris Samorodov , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 18:27:32 -0000 On 9 April 2012 17:49, Julian H. Stacey wrote: >> portmgr's policy is to honor removal requests, no matter the circumstances. > ................................................ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Irresponsible. Real 'Managers' shoulder responsibility. So ... Real managers get paid. Real managers get paid by companies. Real managers get paid by companies with legal departments who will defend them from frivolous lawsuits, and pay them during the period of time while the frivolous lawsuit works its way through the US court system. I have given thousands of hours of free work to this project. I'm damned sure not going to incur any legal liability on top of that, even if due to someone wanting to take an unreasonable position. Perhaps the legal system in Germany is less broken than the US. I certainly hope so. But until you sit in my seat, and have been threatened with lawsuits in the past for equally unreasonable situations, you simply don't know what you're talking about. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 9 22:04:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33BF106566C for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 22:04:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98F18FC12 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 22:04:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q39M4k18055134 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 22:04:46 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q39M4kS5055133 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 22:04:46 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:04:42 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20120409220442.GE90364@azathoth.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X3gaHHMYHkYqP6yf" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Subject: Time to kill php4, who stands up to save it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 22:04:47 -0000 --X3gaHHMYHkYqP6yf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi, Apparently we are still sheaping php4 and his friends, which is EOLed by upstream since 2008. on the ports tree we have two consumer of php4, once which seems to be able to run with php5 according to upstream website and the second which already have a newer version using php5 in the ports tree. So if you really have reason to save php4, please stand up. regards, Bapt --X3gaHHMYHkYqP6yf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+DXPoACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ey1QACeJuhbBsOR6SWOtj6Pl8eXjQxI I78An07KdBtnnTo5H+MdI0bdTTVVnuNk =AN1a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X3gaHHMYHkYqP6yf-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 9 22:21:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126B21065674 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 22:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B448FC08 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 22:21:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE83D5C22 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:35:08 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F8360EB.6090605@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:21:31 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <201204091749.q39HnYsF092884@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: <201204091749.q39HnYsF092884@fire.js.berklix.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 22:21:33 -0000 On 04/10/12 03:49, Julian H. Stacey wrote: >> From: Chris Rees >> >> Well, whatever he says, he can't revoke the license of what's already >> been distributed. >> >> ############################################################################ >> # Copyright (c) 2008 Rick Sanders # >> # # >> # Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any # >> # purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above # >> # copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies. # > ... > > Exactly ! > > >> From: Mark Linimon >> portmgr's policy is to honor removal requests, no matter the circumstances. > ................................................ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > Irresponsible. Real 'Managers' shoulder responsibility. So ... > > In /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, define a warning variable after > NO_CDROM, NO_PACKAGE, [ RESTRICTED_FILES ], with example: > > WARNING+="Generic author tried to retrospectively withdraw sources." > # Maintainer suggest see files/...& http://... > > Allow individual ports Maintainers to indicate status of issues. > Allow individual installers to decide their Own take on issues, Not Yours ! > > - Ports wrappers belong to FreeBSD, not generic authors. > - Sources once published can't be unpublished. > (IMO No need of a new project& port name to excuse retention). > - Distfiles if not on freebsd.org site are not even our problem. > > portmgr should retain respect by dumping a foolish policy. sticking > to technical& avoiding programmers guesses& fears about laws, or > assumptions USA law controls global law or whatever else. Stay > technical. The globe has 196 countries with their own legal > jurisdictions, individual installers should be able to make their > own decision on law& risks& morality as localy appropriate. To stick my nose where it probably doesn't belong: indeed. This is one area where linux annoys the most for that very reason. Let the user decide and bear the responsibility. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 9 22:26:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50731065673; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 22:26:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: from mail.droso.net (grizzly.droso.dk [IPv6:2a01:4f8:100:9424::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A848FC12; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 22:26:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 54DA92A6A; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:26:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:26:53 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20120409222652.GK66606@droso.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24" Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/amd64 9.0-RELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Subject: [HEADSUP]: Ports tree unfrozen X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 22:26:55 -0000 --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable With the final builds starting for 8.3-RELEASE, the feature freeze has been lifted. Erwin --=20 Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Prediction is very difficult especially about the future erwin@FreeBSD.org --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFPg2Isqy9aWxUlaZARAssmAJ9bxyuQJOH8/EG9feiczI/AERDl5QCgrdOT OyjQ5A22GI0TPnfIuxaz4Ag= =oKwu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 9 22:30:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D59106564A for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 22:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D5A150589; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 22:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F83631C.3080807@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:30:52 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120404 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Da Rock References: <201204091749.q39HnYsF092884@fire.js.berklix.net> <4F8360EB.6090605@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4F8360EB.6090605@herveybayaustralia.com.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 22:30:53 -0000 On 04/09/2012 15:21, Da Rock wrote: > To stick my nose where it probably doesn't belong: indeed. This is one > area where linux annoys the most for that very reason. > > Let the user decide and bear the responsibility. If you want to put up a server with all the encumbered software and let people download it, go right ahead. Meanwhile, the project has chosen (wisely) not to run the risk of legal entanglements. ... not to mention the common courtesy of following the wishes of those who created the software in the first place. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 9 22:49:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E6D1065782 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 22:49:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A87B8FC14 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 22:49:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7803A5C22 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:03:12 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F83677F.2060809@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:49:35 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <201204091749.q39HnYsF092884@fire.js.berklix.net> <4F8360EB.6090605@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F83631C.3080807@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F83631C.3080807@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 22:49:37 -0000 On 04/10/12 08:30, Doug Barton wrote: > On 04/09/2012 15:21, Da Rock wrote: >> To stick my nose where it probably doesn't belong: indeed. This is one >> area where linux annoys the most for that very reason. >> >> Let the user decide and bear the responsibility. > If you want to put up a server with all the encumbered software and let > people download it, go right ahead. Meanwhile, the project has chosen > (wisely) not to run the risk of legal entanglements. > > ... not to mention the common courtesy of following the wishes of those > who created the software in the first place. Part of the beauty of FreeBSD is ports, so that the user downloads from the source (or somewhere appropriate) and _not_ the project's servers. The only possible area for the 'entanglement' is the fact the framework lists where to download from. As for the wishes of the author... plain english is plain english- when you relinquish a right you can't un-relinquish it (if that is actually a word). Even the legal system has trouble (or simply cannot do it) with putting the cat back in the bag, unbolting the horse, etc, when there is a legal right to do so; to say nothing about this case. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 9 22:55:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BD0106566B for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 22:55:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFCE1576ED; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 22:55:00 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F8368C3.8040603@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:54:59 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120404 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Da Rock References: <201204091749.q39HnYsF092884@fire.js.berklix.net> <4F8360EB.6090605@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F83631C.3080807@FreeBSD.org> <4F83677F.2060809@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4F83677F.2060809@herveybayaustralia.com.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 22:55:00 -0000 I think it's great that you have thoughts and ideas about this topic. Feel free to put them into practice. Meanwhile, the FreeBSD project has different thoughts and ideas about this topic, and is overwhelmingly unlikely to change them. So, time to move on. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 9 23:01:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE155106566C for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 23:01:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CA18FC12 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 23:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 208D75C22 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:15:35 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F836A65.7080402@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:01:57 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F7E498E.7070007@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F804679.2040803@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F80D4F9.9020207@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4F80D4F9.9020207@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba34-3.4.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 23:02:00 -0000 On 04/08/12 09:59, Da Rock wrote: > On 04/08/12 00:02, Chris Rees wrote: >> On 7 April 2012 13:51, Da >> Rock wrote: >>> On 04/06/12 13:20, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote: >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> Can you show the build output? Port should't directly dipend from >>>> anything like this. >>> Sorry, it was on a clients system and I couldn't get the info >>> across. I can >>> only say for sure that installing libnet fixed the issue. >>> >>> The build error was an undeclared function or const (most likely >>> const) that >>> was supplied by libnet. >>> >>> Sorry I can't tell you any more information; I emailed this to >>> notify of the >>> fix, and for others if they come across the issue in the future. >>> Googling >>> was what put me on to this fix as well. >> If you could give some idea of the site that advised this, that could >> probably help too. > > Again, my apologies. Let me try this again and see if I can be a > little more organised with my description. > > This was a clean, fresh install on an amd64 (Atom cpu, although I did > try on a real cpu too). I tried 3.6 first, it didn't build. Then I > tried 3.5, when that didn't work (same error) I looked at the handbook > and it was still on 3.4, and during my googling I noticed that there > could be an issue with incompatibility with the libsmbclient; so I > reverted to 3.4. It didn't build either, and they all had the same error. > > So I googled some more on this error, but there wasn't much on it at > all. I did notice a lot of comments on samba, tdb, and libnet, and > there was a clue in the error of a libnet dependency (sorry I just > can't remember, so much has happened in the 24 hr period); so I tried > installing libnet and then built samba 3.4 (to avoid further issues > and conflicts) and presto! it all built. > > That was the day prior to my post, and I figured someone could run a > clean build and find this as well; failing that, someone would come > across this again in the future. As you can see it wasn't anything in > particular that set me on this, just a hunch I followed and lucked out > on a resolution, but it worked :) > > I hope that helps someone... To drag this up again, I was thinking about the number of cases I've found like this recently, and I was considering what the most appropriate action to take here. This one is obviously controversial, and I didn't have the time to do more or test further, but for future reference I'd like some clarification. I'd say a PR is not really appropriate as a response to an issue such as this (unless the maintainer offers no response at all), but should I create a patch to assist the maintainer? Or is that over doing it? If I were to create a patch, what is the correct (usable) procedure? And for something like this it would be an adjustment to BUILD_DEPENDS, correct? Thanks for the clarification guys. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 9 23:13:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69EDF106566B for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 23:13:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from nk11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com (nk11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com [17.158.161.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489388FC0C for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 23:13:19 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (unknown [17.209.4.71]) by nk11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01(7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0M2800GERJ5EXI80@nk11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 23:12:51 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.6.7498,1.0.260,0.0.0000 definitions=2012-04-09_03:2012-04-09, 2012-04-09, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1204090287 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <4F836A65.7080402@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 16:12:49 -0700 Message-id: References: <4F7E498E.7070007@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F804679.2040803@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F80D4F9.9020207@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F836A65.7080402@herveybayaustralia.com.au> To: Da Rock X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba34-3.4.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 23:13:19 -0000 Hi-- On Apr 9, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Da Rock wrote: > To drag this up again, I was thinking about the number of cases I've found like this recently, and I was considering what the most appropriate action to take here. This one is obviously controversial, and I didn't have the time to do more or test further, but for future reference I'd like some clarification. > > I'd say a PR is not really appropriate as a response to an issue such as this (unless the maintainer offers no response at all), but should I create a patch to assist the maintainer? Or is that over doing it? > > If I were to create a patch, what is the correct (usable) procedure? And for something like this it would be an adjustment to BUILD_DEPENDS, correct? If you think there is a missing dependency, then doing send-pr with the fix is a reasonable procedure. However, you might first want to look into what was different in your case from pointyhat, since the builds of samba-3.x worked fine: http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-latest-logs/samba34-3.4.14.log http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-latest-logs/samba35-3.5.11.log http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-latest-logs/samba36-3.6.3.log Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 00:26:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A52106566B for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:26:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53CD8FC14 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0EDE25C22 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:39:53 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F837E27.8070503@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:26:15 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F7E498E.7070007@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F804679.2040803@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F80D4F9.9020207@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F836A65.7080402@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba34-3.4.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:26:23 -0000 On 04/10/12 09:12, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Hi-- > > On Apr 9, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Da Rock wrote: >> To drag this up again, I was thinking about the number of cases I've found like this recently, and I was considering what the most appropriate action to take here. This one is obviously controversial, and I didn't have the time to do more or test further, but for future reference I'd like some clarification. >> >> I'd say a PR is not really appropriate as a response to an issue such as this (unless the maintainer offers no response at all), but should I create a patch to assist the maintainer? Or is that over doing it? >> >> If I were to create a patch, what is the correct (usable) procedure? And for something like this it would be an adjustment to BUILD_DEPENDS, correct? > If you think there is a missing dependency, then doing send-pr with the fix is a reasonable procedure. I was only thinking the maintainer might want to know and fix and test themselves before commit. I know I would as a maintainer. > However, you might first want to look into what was different in your case from pointyhat, since the builds of samba-3.x worked fine: > > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-latest-logs/samba34-3.4.14.log > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-latest-logs/samba35-3.5.11.log > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-latest-logs/samba36-3.6.3.log Hmmm. You're right. I can narrow it down to the SWAT or AIO option (most likely given the obvious network connection there), but it could be ADS, ACL, or FAM; but I doubt that very much. You have me intrigued now, I have to look into it to know :) So what should the patch look like? Am I correct in my understanding of the BUILD_DEPENDS, or have I chased a goose on that one? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 02:27:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4050106566C for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:27:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4BA8FC16 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:27:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3A221oe038074 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 21:02:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Message-ID: <4F839499.8050103@missouri.edu> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 21:02:01 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: autodetecting dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:27:20 -0000 So suppose we are building port A. It turns out that the configure in port A autodetects whether package B is present or not. It will build either way. But if built with package B, it will not operate without it. So suppose I build port A on machine X which has package B installed. Then I create a package from A, and copy the package to machine Y. Machine Y does not have package B installed, and so when package A is installed, it doesn't work on machine Y. What are the accepted ways of handling this? 1. Don't worry about it. tinderbox builds will never build port A in the presence of package B. 2. Have the Makefile of port A detect whether package B is installed, and if it is then add B as a dependency of A. 3. Cripple the configure in port A so that it doesn't autodetect for package B. (Sometimes this can be done using a suitable CONFIGURE_ARGS, but not in my particular situation.) I prefer the answer (1). But I am interested in other people's opinions. One problem with (2) or (3) is that the creator of the port might never find out which packages could be autodetected by port A's configure without performing an exhaustive search of the source code of A. Thanks, Stephen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 02:56:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FCF5106564A for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:56:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513C88FC15 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E586A7E843 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 18:56:56 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4F83A164.8060107@acsalaska.net> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:56:36 +0200 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F839499.8050103@missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <4F839499.8050103@missouri.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: autodetecting dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:56:58 -0000 On 4/10/2012 04:02, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > 1. Don't worry about it. tinderbox builds will never build port A in > the presence of package B. > > 2. Have the Makefile of port A detect whether package B is installed, > and if it is then add B as a dependency of A. > > 3. Cripple the configure in port A so that it doesn't autodetect for > package B. (Sometimes this can be done using a suitable CONFIGURE_ARGS, > but not in my particular situation.) 4. Add OPTION PACKAGE_B. And cripple configure through EXTRA_PATCH if set to off. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 03:14:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C70106566C for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:14:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C338FC08 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:14:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EAF7E843 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 19:14:49 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4F83A595.9090806@acsalaska.net> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 05:14:29 +0200 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F7E498E.7070007@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F804679.2040803@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F80D4F9.9020207@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F836A65.7080402@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F837E27.8070503@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4F837E27.8070503@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba34-3.4.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:14:51 -0000 On 4/10/2012 02:26, Da Rock wrote: > So what should the patch look like? Am I correct in my understanding of > the BUILD_DEPENDS, or have I chased a goose on that one? I'd like to divert your attention to the libnet source directory in samba distribution. It's built by default and integrated into pretty much every binary through libnetapi. Your focus should shift to the compilation error itself, your solution of installing the port libnet masked the actual problem. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 03:50:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD58106566B; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:50:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com) Received: from idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca (idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED008FC15; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:50:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pd2ml2so-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.141.134]) by pd2mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 09 Apr 2012 21:50:09 -0600 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=FBhiVrZmCxhz+jlnxOWeJaR14+PwdUeacMZGNnSzbtQ= c=1 sm=1 a=rUrS5ZphJAYA:10 a=QrugwKR0C_UA:10 a=wAGQQ9Az6v0A:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=ICAaq7hcmGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=IbtKDeXwb2+SRU442/pi3A==:17 a=BWvPGDcYAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=TzLO879s3_73-xjNRjkA:9 a=nAR0nFkXhI4oBUEX_MUA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=V7tsTZBp22UA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Received: from unknown (HELO spqr.komquats.com) ([96.50.7.119]) by pd2ml2so-dmz.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 09 Apr 2012 21:50:09 -0600 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy3.cwsent.com [10.1.3.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E2F171; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 20:50:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slippy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3A3o8SN005881; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 20:50:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com) Message-Id: <201204100350.q3A3o8SN005881@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3 From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.komquats.com/ To: Baptiste Daroussin In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:04:42 +0200." <20120409220442.GE90364@azathoth.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:50:08 -0700 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Time to kill php4, who stands up to save it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Cy Schubert List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:50:15 -0000 In message <20120409220442.GE90364@azathoth.lan>, Baptiste Daroussin writes: > Hi, > > Apparently we are still sheaping php4 and his friends, which is EOLed by > upstream since 2008. > > on the ports tree we have two consumer of php4, once which seems to be able t > o > run with php5 according to upstream website and the second which already have > a > newer version using php5 in the ports tree. > > So if you really have reason to save php4, please stand up. I see no reason to keep php4. On a tangential issue, php52 should probably be kept around, at least for now. I know of at least one port (www/gallery) which breaks under the latest PHP due to deprecated function calls which make a mess of websites using the port (warning messages that should go to a logfile are displayed on the webpage itself). I think these ports should be deprecated, giving users ample time to migrate to newer ports (e.g. migration of gallery to gallery3 is somewhat involved). -- Cheers, Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 04:14:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1561B106566B for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:14:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4D88FC14 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:14:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70AB75C22 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:27:56 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F83B39B.3070301@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:14:19 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F7E498E.7070007@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F804679.2040803@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F80D4F9.9020207@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F836A65.7080402@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F837E27.8070503@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F83A595.9090806@acsalaska.net> In-Reply-To: <4F83A595.9090806@acsalaska.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba34-3.4.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:14:21 -0000 On 04/10/12 13:14, Mel Flynn wrote: > On 4/10/2012 02:26, Da Rock wrote: > >> So what should the patch look like? Am I correct in my understanding of >> the BUILD_DEPENDS, or have I chased a goose on that one? > I'd like to divert your attention to the libnet source directory in > samba distribution. It's built by default and integrated into pretty > much every binary through libnetapi. > Your focus should shift to the compilation error itself, your solution > of installing the port libnet masked the actual problem. I'll look into it then. I'm still trying to determine what sets it off. I'm fairly sure ADS is a major factor, though simply disabling it merely grows another failure elsewhere... :/ I'll start posting the logs soon. Is there a particular reason why a dependency on libnet is an issue? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 06:30:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3FA110656B4 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:30:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from nk11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com (nk11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com [17.158.161.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C53D8FC14 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:30:21 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [17.153.61.129] (unknown [17.153.61.129]) by nk11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01(7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0M29009BM3EI5580@nk11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:30:21 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.6.7498,1.0.260,0.0.0000 definitions=2012-04-09_07:2012-04-09, 2012-04-09, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1204090425 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <4F837E27.8070503@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 23:30:17 -0700 Message-id: References: <4F7E498E.7070007@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F804679.2040803@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F80D4F9.9020207@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F836A65.7080402@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F837E27.8070503@herveybayaustralia.com.au> To: Da Rock X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba34-3.4.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:30:22 -0000 On Apr 9, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Da Rock wrote: [ ... ] >> If you think there is a missing dependency, then doing send-pr with the fix is a reasonable procedure. > > I was only thinking the maintainer might want to know and fix and test themselves before commit. I know I would as a maintainer. Sure-- a PR with a change to a port will be assigned to the maintainer to test and approve. >> However, you might first want to look into what was different in your case from pointyhat, since the builds of samba-3.x worked fine: >> >> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-latest-logs/samba34-3.4.14.log >> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-latest-logs/samba35-3.5.11.log >> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-latest-logs/samba36-3.6.3.log > > Hmmm. You're right. > > I can narrow it down to the SWAT or AIO option (most likely given the obvious network connection there), but it could be ADS, ACL, or FAM; but I doubt that very much. You have me intrigued now, I have to look into it to know :) > > So what should the patch look like? Am I correct in my understanding of the BUILD_DEPENDS, or have I chased a goose on that one? Don't know-- I don't recall having a build of Samba fail for me any time recently, but if you can confirm that a specific option causes the build failure, that would help reproduce. Note that I'd gotten the impression that you had installed libnet separately, which would be a library and not just a build dependency... Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 06:43:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605B51065672; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:43:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF73E8FC15; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so5012850bkc.13 for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 23:43:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=EjkMqEbaEQcbW5x9G83kui+X1DWqVuxQKdNJP3vSJ1s=; b=t7qucGpE8I1k2ZzipJ3wDtMADg9MYBxK+zRMTbKgtg2Ot76cRhg/rts1joTdAQqerV P8zinu3xrG0w23lewXiGhG58erUqD+enQ5G1QBBHBVtQ9VIab0XNU1ICxokFepbg1ff4 CTJsfgX0jj53L8IiVzt3MZ6+20nUKPOlD6oB/qGDBdfC4tt7nI8Wg91TtfTDcrkZYzTZ 0FRdkkWz6n7Zpuelc9Jzjslr/QXYbNhqOBQpxdOsEP7TTtYXYnSGPe+eG724lztj0L49 KeHMO6spjQrq4yGWsSp5BNdyqrhG1F5uJ0MK4bZ0JhSTprZhPsX4PcPcX2UoXSpyMuR3 VGZA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.12.10 with SMTP id v10mr4000539bkv.1.1334040213065; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 23:43:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 23:43:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 23:43:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201204100350.q3A3o8SN005881@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <20120409220442.GE90364@azathoth.lan> <201204100350.q3A3o8SN005881@slippy.cwsent.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:43:32 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Cy Schubert Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: Time to kill php4, who stands up to save it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:43:40 -0000 On 10 Apr 2012 04:50, "Cy Schubert" wrote: > > In message <20120409220442.GE90364@azathoth.lan>, Baptiste Daroussin writes: > > Hi, > > > > Apparently we are still sheaping php4 and his friends, which is EOLed by > > upstream since 2008. > > > > on the ports tree we have two consumer of php4, once which seems to be able t > > o > > run with php5 according to upstream website and the second which already have > > a > > newer version using php5 in the ports tree. > > > > So if you really have reason to save php4, please stand up. > > I see no reason to keep php4. > > On a tangential issue, php52 should probably be kept around, at least for > now. The PHP maintainer disagreed on this point last week-ish. Chris > > FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org > > The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 07:57:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D061106564A for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:57:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4E68FC0A for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:57:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F4BE5C22 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:11:09 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F83E7EC.10906@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:57:32 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F7E498E.7070007@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F804679.2040803@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F80D4F9.9020207@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F836A65.7080402@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F837E27.8070503@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba34-3.4.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:57:35 -0000 On 04/10/12 16:30, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Apr 9, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Da Rock wrote: > [ ... ] >>> If you think there is a missing dependency, then doing send-pr with the fix is a reasonable procedure. >> I was only thinking the maintainer might want to know and fix and test themselves before commit. I know I would as a maintainer. > Sure-- a PR with a change to a port will be assigned to the maintainer to test and approve. Ah. I wasn't aware that was the case, especially if the maintainer cannot specifically commit. > >>> However, you might first want to look into what was different in your case from pointyhat, since the builds of samba-3.x worked fine: >>> >>> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-latest-logs/samba34-3.4.14.log >>> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-latest-logs/samba35-3.5.11.log >>> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-latest-logs/samba36-3.6.3.log >> Hmmm. You're right. >> >> I can narrow it down to the SWAT or AIO option (most likely given the obvious network connection there), but it could be ADS, ACL, or FAM; but I doubt that very much. You have me intrigued now, I have to look into it to know :) >> >> So what should the patch look like? Am I correct in my understanding of the BUILD_DEPENDS, or have I chased a goose on that one? > Don't know-- I don't recall having a build of Samba fail for me any time recently, but if you can confirm that a specific option causes the build failure, that would help reproduce. So far all the options are causing _a_ failure- swat, ads, aio, acl, fam. I'm still going, but I think thats all of them. > Note that I'd gotten the impression that you had installed libnet separately, which would be a library and not just a build dependency... I am still looking into it as time permits, but I'm not sure I understand the difference? I had to install libnet separately in order to build. How does that fit in your comment? I'm still a very newbie developer so I'm not always accurately understanding the terms, I think. If I start getting these terms right I think I might just get better at this stuff in the makefiles :) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 08:07:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5653A1065672 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:07:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timur@bat.ru) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE7C8FC08 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:07:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wern13 with SMTP id n13so4049515wer.13 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:07:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=LVkvLmHxX1fIBVkIs/P+jR9TARTYrYK0e397LIDOQH8=; b=fOInyeRYrDg6SSVj+2OSGaPK0uM13AT8VOV+xKS1v/DrKToBmuuf3e+FtDeHscQPXs bsrtiO+7tTbDKk7mOQQSgsaRExk0iRLiSZ4Vz++J0D2+wPIL6JTPLj3nfoKn4B0y01ic XYCJJCVrLn+0naBegY9nmdlagBvqgvEew0EOfdHPMQ66uAWEWwSKXVafamYTGdKVt4aK IdPAnOn3zyR6Djeexxrn3z9V4Brb5cby9iyKjuU0FOckyadTZcvFBpLjeCVBxGiKt+Aj 5FWnvWtjX8a/UHNgg9ymIY5QgS5+8tdPOJXl0jnk/nFkAAfCA3VI1k6Rpjd5QAVfdD/H /J4w== Received: by 10.180.105.194 with SMTP id go2mr4572389wib.22.1334045242707; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:07:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.127.206 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:06:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F83E7EC.10906@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4F7E498E.7070007@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F804679.2040803@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F80D4F9.9020207@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F836A65.7080402@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F837E27.8070503@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F83E7EC.10906@herveybayaustralia.com.au> From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:06:59 +0200 Message-ID: To: Da Rock Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlYzatToQzI6p38KKqQ2GaepRDZkju07EZLu4/p17eyA7l9SfMbNa503begjepzyQtv207K Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba34-3.4.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:07:24 -0000 On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Da Rock wrote: > On 04/10/12 16:30, Chuck Swiger wrote: >> >> On Apr 9, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Da Rock wrote: >> [ ... ] >>>> >>>> If you think there is a missing dependency, then doing send-pr with the >>>> fix is a reasonable procedure. >>> >>> I was only thinking the maintainer might want to know and fix and test >>> themselves before commit. I know I would as a maintainer. >> >> Sure-- a PR with a change to a port will be assigned to the maintainer to >> test and approve. > > > Ah. I wasn't aware that was the case, especially if the maintainer cannot > specifically commit. >> Note that I'd gotten the impression that you had installed libnet >> separately, which would be a library and not just a build dependency... > > I am still looking into it as time permits, but I'm not sure I understand > the difference? I had to install libnet separately in order to build. How > does that fit in your comment? I'm still a very newbie developer so I'm not > always accurately understanding the terms, I think. I'm not sure, which libnet you are referring to. None of the Sambas should really depend from anything called libnet. At least - externally. Also, please show the content of your /etc/make.conf, it could be that you are mangling include flags. With regards, Timur Bakeyev. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 09:08:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE16C106564A for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:08:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A124A8FC14 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:08:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB79D23D0B for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 05:08:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93006D23D05 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 05:08:30 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4F83F893.7040500@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 05:08:35 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: .if ARCH / BROKEN, or 'NOT_FOR_ARCH'? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:08:32 -0000 I believe there was a discussion a while back, and if you used this: .if ${ARCH} == "sparc64" BROKEN= does not compile on sparc64: assertion failed .endif it is POSSIBLE that cluster runs that test broken ports could fix them (accidentally), but, wasn't the opinion that you might as well use ' NOT_FOR_ARCH(s)? ' -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 09:12:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2EB71065673; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:12:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4598FC0C; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBE001.dip.t-dialin.net [217.251.224.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q3A9CfB4046358; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:12:42 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3A9E8c0056674; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:14:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3A9DbPc008384; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:13:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201204100913.q3A9DbPc008384@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Mikhail Tsatsenko From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Sun, 08 Apr 2012 17:51:27 +0400." <4F8197DF.9060701@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:13:37 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: Scot Hetzel , Chris Rees , Jason Helfman , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon , Boris Samorodov Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:12:49 -0000 Mikhail Tsatsenko wrote: > On 08.04.2012 05:25, Mark Linimon wrote: > > portmgr's policy is to honor removal requests, no matter the circumstances. > > If someone wants to fork the last free release and host it somewhere, I > > would be less concerned in that case. > > > > mcl > I'd like to create a fork, but I didn't find last distfile anywhere. > Author removed it from his website and ftp.FreeBSD.org hosts only > previous version 1.133. > Does anybody have 1.135 distfile? http://ftp2.uk.freebsd.org/sites/ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/distfiles/%5Bpage=123%5D I just downloaded a copy for security as its a mirror 108952 bytes MD5 (imap_tools_V1.135.tar.gz) = a7c34141b7512bff69f6ea86952c83bb & I will private mail you a copy. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 09:16:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78EDB1065670 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:16:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: from mail.droso.net (grizzly.droso.dk [78.46.50.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3158FC08 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9851A5821; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:16:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:16:19 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120410091619.GS66606@droso.net> References: <4F83F893.7040500@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F83F893.7040500@FreeBSD.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/amd64 9.0-RELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Subject: Re: .if ARCH / BROKEN, or 'NOT_FOR_ARCH'? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:16:27 -0000 On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 05:08:35AM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: > I believe there was a discussion a while back, and if you used this: > > .if ${ARCH} == "sparc64" > BROKEN= does not compile on sparc64: assertion failed > .endif > > it is POSSIBLE that cluster runs that test broken ports could fix them (accidentally), but, wasn't the opinion that you might as well use ' > NOT_FOR_ARCH(s)? ' > The rationele is that we use NOT_FOR_ARCHS and ONLY_FOR_ARCHS for ports that are not supported on those architecture from the upstream or for some other reasone are known to not work and never will work on those architectures. BROKEN is for less permanent or unknown breakage, like errors on pointyhat where the one analyzing the logs doesn't have detailed knownledge of each port and its breakage, and is used as a warning to users, so they don't try to build a port and get disappointed after installing all its dependencies, and as a message to the maintainer that something is wrong. There are quite a few large grey areas between those, but that's the general outline. Erwin -- Erwin Lansing http://droso.dk erwin@FreeBSD.org http:// www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 09:31:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF224106567E for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:31:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957F98FC1B for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:31:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC5135C22 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:44:51 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F83FDE1.1050804@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:31:13 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F7E498E.7070007@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F804679.2040803@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F80D4F9.9020207@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F836A65.7080402@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F837E27.8070503@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F83E7EC.10906@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba34-3.4.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:31:16 -0000 On 04/10/12 18:06, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Da Rock > wrote: >> On 04/10/12 16:30, Chuck Swiger wrote: >>> On Apr 9, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Da Rock wrote: >>> [ ... ] >>>>> If you think there is a missing dependency, then doing send-pr with the >>>>> fix is a reasonable procedure. >>>> I was only thinking the maintainer might want to know and fix and test >>>> themselves before commit. I know I would as a maintainer. >>> Sure-- a PR with a change to a port will be assigned to the maintainer to >>> test and approve. >> >> Ah. I wasn't aware that was the case, especially if the maintainer cannot >> specifically commit. >>> Note that I'd gotten the impression that you had installed libnet >>> separately, which would be a library and not just a build dependency... >> I am still looking into it as time permits, but I'm not sure I understand >> the difference? I had to install libnet separately in order to build. How >> does that fit in your comment? I'm still a very newbie developer so I'm not >> always accurately understanding the terms, I think. > I'm not sure, which libnet you are referring to. None of the Sambas > should really depend from anything called libnet. At least - > externally. Thats what I'm trying to figure out now, well, as my time permits anyway :) > > Also, please show the content of your /etc/make.conf, it could be that > you are mangling include flags. make.conf: end of make.conf ;) Well thats not entirely accurate, I only have a USE_OPENSSL_BASE and the usual perl stuff and thats all. I get a bit of a kick out of that when someone asks if there's something in the make.conf- I only use some of the kerberos options on occasion when called for (not lately), but I learnt my lesson a long time ago: don't touch the make.conf! I created some issues in the past doing that... :) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 09:33:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE791065676 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:33:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6D58FC0A for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:33:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9872DD23C04 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 05:33:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4302D23C03 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 05:33:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4F83FE52.5010501@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 05:33:06 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <4F83F893.7040500@FreeBSD.org> <20120410091619.GS66606@droso.net> In-Reply-To: <20120410091619.GS66606@droso.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: .if ARCH / BROKEN, or 'NOT_FOR_ARCH'? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:33:03 -0000 On 4/10/12 5:16 AM, Erwin Lansing wrote: > maintainer that something is wrong. > > There are quite a few large grey areas between those, but that's the > general outline. so, if the maintainer knows something, and knows it won't ever get fixed, then 'NOT_FOR_ARCHS' is best, if its an unknown/ maybe osversion, something the maintainer didn't know about, portmgr might mark it broken wrapped in a .if ${ARCH}. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 09:39:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE412106566B; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:39:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472AC8FC0A; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:39:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so5173707bkc.13 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:39:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9jTj0QloFWXwPoFgePt81Q/Le2JXQ7pDvA55kT/2NUc=; b=qGJZHYwd9vmibo5/awe6ePBXyLG8mc4yqOe4NYTGfa/Ch9glithoHBM3CLnnJsMj09 +mLQ1xzJcnqRvBoZg5p3diDU/rU+rkXcwm6NHSBIE85tbKxvF9x5DkqIdE3hTBDt4Neq HYVpwj12FCcsWvqeAhPHuwD83zkTdDt0AMRe2B5sW9wacR3fZrFQ6pXC2zKepUJwiXta 8PBVJeQfrl+NyXK1xXYBwe4GI/PxbrhdQypCK0nsqJ759SZenut5H04jRzYoyOSJOpb/ ZN0fSQ3H7s6PT7tgIbWt5itQiNirpTyDBmFbRAQPhPYEkmsKRg9KJfpkMrdt3yeBPO/B qBbQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.128.65 with SMTP id j1mr4443367bks.74.1334050775156; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:39:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:39:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:39:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F83FE52.5010501@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F83F893.7040500@FreeBSD.org> <20120410091619.GS66606@droso.net> <4F83FE52.5010501@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:39:35 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Michael Scheidell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: .if ARCH / BROKEN, or 'NOT_FOR_ARCH'? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:39:37 -0000 On 10 Apr 2012 10:33, "Michael Scheidell" wrote: > > > > On 4/10/12 5:16 AM, Erwin Lansing wrote: >> >> maintainer that something is wrong. >> >> There are quite a few large grey areas between those, but that's the >> general outline. > > so, if the maintainer knows something, and knows it won't ever get fixed, then 'NOT_FOR_ARCHS' is best, > if its an unknown/ maybe osversion, something the maintainer didn't know about, portmgr might mark it broken wrapped in a .if ${ARCH}. > > Yes. Bsd.port.options.mk is required beforehand of course. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 10:08:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AEEB106564A; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:08:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gahr@gahr.no-ip.org) Received: from cpanel05.rubas-s05.net (cpanel05.rubas-s05.net [195.182.222.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DAE8FC08; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:08:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 175-3.192-178.cust.bluewin.ch ([178.192.3.175] helo=gahr.no-ip.org) by cpanel05.rubas-s05.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SHXAq-0003XN-CO; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:15:40 +0200 Received: by gahr.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D49704505F; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:15:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:15:38 +0200 From: Pietro Cerutti To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20120410091537.GK98668@gahrfit.gahr.ch> References: <201204092351.q39Npi6F025202@repoman.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Ls2Gy6y7jbHLe9Od" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201204092351.q39Npi6F025202@repoman.freebsd.org> X-PGP-Key: 0x9571F78E X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1203 92B5 3919 AF84 9B97 28D6 C0C2 6A98 9571 F78E User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cpanel05.rubas-s05.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - gahr.no-ip.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: bapt@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/8kingdoms Makefile ports/misc/airoflash Makefile ports/graphics/autopano-sift Makefile ports/x11/avant-window-navigator-xfce4 Makefile ports/lang/boo Makefile ports/x11/cl-clx-sbcl Makefile ports/palm/coldsync ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gahr@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:08:50 -0000 --Ls2Gy6y7jbHLe9Od Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have strong opinions against this, at least for ports with an active maintainer. I really see these deprecation campaigns as treading on somebody's toes. I really like linimon's periodic emails "FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently marked broken", which I see as a reminder that there are ports of mine that require action, but going further than that and deprecate a port that I maintain without even informing me in an official way is not what I consider collaboration. Even more so because I don't see any advantage in moving a port from BROKEN to DEPRECATED state. If a user has a working version of the port installed, he will stick to that, otherwise, installation will be frown upon anyway. I and bapt have already exchanged opinions on this subject more than once, and I would now like to see what other people (other maintainers in particular) think about it. Can we please stop this? On 2012-Apr-09, 23:51, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > bapt 2012-04-09 23:51:44 UTC >=20 > FreeBSD ports repository >=20 > Modified files: > games/8kingdoms Makefile=20 > misc/airoflash Makefile=20 > graphics/autopano-sift Makefile=20 > x11/avant-window-navigator-xfce4 Makefile=20 > lang/boo Makefile=20 > x11/cl-clx-sbcl Makefile=20 > palm/coldsync Makefile=20 > print/cups-magicolor Makefile=20 > deskutils/doodle Makefile=20 > games/flightgear-atlas Makefile=20 > games/freeorion Makefile=20 > net-p2p/gnunet Makefile=20 > audio/gstreamer-plugins-flite Makefile=20 > x11-themes/gtk-qt-engine Makefile=20 > science/hdf Makefile=20 > databases/hypertable Makefile=20 > www/kazehakase Makefile=20 > x11-themes/kde-icons-amaranth Makefile=20 > x11-themes/kde-icons-amaranth-althaea Makefile=20 > x11-themes/kde-icons-krystaline Makefile=20 > x11-themes/kde-icons-realistic Makefile=20 > misc/kde3-i18n-hsb Makefile=20 > misc/kde3-i18n-mt Makefile=20 > misc/kde3-i18n-nso Makefile=20 > editors/komodo-edit Makefile=20 > graphics/linux-ac3d Makefile=20 > sysutils/linux-megamgr Makefile=20 > mail/lmtpd Makefile=20 > graphics/long-exposure-tools Makefile=20 > multimedia/moonlight Makefile=20 > devel/nana Makefile=20 > databases/ocaml-pgocaml Makefile=20 > math/octave-devel Makefile=20 > multimedia/p5-Video-Info Makefile=20 > security/pantera Makefile=20 > databases/pear-MDB2_Driver_ibase Makefile=20 > net/perldap Makefile=20 > math/petsc Makefile=20 > math/petsc-mpich Makefile=20 > databases/pg_filedump Makefile=20 > net-im/pino Makefile=20 > chinese/cxterm Makefile=20 > net-p2p/py-bittorrent Makefile=20 > net-p2p/py-bittorrent-core Makefile=20 > games/rigsofrods Makefile=20 > databases/ruby-kyotocabinet Makefile=20 > devel/rubygem-vmc Makefile=20 > cad/salome-gui Makefile=20 > math/scilab-toolbox-sivp Makefile=20 > games/secretmaryochronicles Makefile=20 > games/sfbol Makefile=20 > graphics/solang Makefile=20 > net/spnetkit Makefile=20 > databases/sqlrelay Makefile=20 > devel/subcommander2 Makefile=20 > sysutils/thunar-volman-plugin Makefile=20 > games/wesnoth-devel Makefile=20 > x11/x3270 Makefile=20 > games/xchadance Makefile=20 > x11-drivers/xf86-video-rdc Makefile=20 > deskutils/xfce4-volstatus-icon Makefile=20 > multimedia/xfmedia-remote-plugin Makefile=20 > x11-toolkits/xforms-i18n Makefile=20 > Log: > Mark as deprecated and set expiration to 2012-05-10 for ports that are = mark as broken for more than 6 month > =20 > Revision Changes Path > 1.3 +3 -0 ports/audio/gstreamer-plugins-flite/Makefile > 1.6 +3 -0 ports/cad/salome-gui/Makefile > 1.35 +3 -0 ports/chinese/cxterm/Makefile > 1.8 +3 -0 ports/databases/hypertable/Makefile > 1.6 +3 -0 ports/databases/ocaml-pgocaml/Makefile > 1.7 +3 -0 ports/databases/pear-MDB2_Driver_ibase/Makefile > 1.6 +3 -0 ports/databases/pg_filedump/Makefile > 1.14 +3 -0 ports/databases/ruby-kyotocabinet/Makefile > 1.70 +3 -0 ports/databases/sqlrelay/Makefile > 1.23 +3 -0 ports/deskutils/doodle/Makefile > 1.4 +3 -0 ports/deskutils/xfce4-volstatus-icon/Makefile > 1.13 +3 -0 ports/devel/nana/Makefile > 1.5 +3 -0 ports/devel/rubygem-vmc/Makefile > 1.26 +3 -0 ports/devel/subcommander2/Makefile > 1.18 +3 -0 ports/editors/komodo-edit/Makefile > 1.12 +3 -0 ports/games/8kingdoms/Makefile > 1.32 +3 -0 ports/games/flightgear-atlas/Makefile > 1.31 +3 -0 ports/games/freeorion/Makefile > 1.16 +3 -0 ports/games/rigsofrods/Makefile > 1.25 +3 -0 ports/games/secretmaryochronicles/Makefile > 1.15 +3 -0 ports/games/sfbol/Makefile > 1.101 +3 -0 ports/games/wesnoth-devel/Makefile > 1.20 +3 -0 ports/games/xchadance/Makefile > 1.14 +3 -0 ports/graphics/autopano-sift/Makefile > 1.30 +3 -0 ports/graphics/linux-ac3d/Makefile > 1.9 +3 -0 ports/graphics/long-exposure-tools/Makefile > 1.18 +3 -0 ports/graphics/solang/Makefile > 1.7 +3 -0 ports/lang/boo/Makefile > 1.35 +3 -0 ports/mail/lmtpd/Makefile > 1.107 +3 -0 ports/math/octave-devel/Makefile > 1.5 +3 -0 ports/math/petsc-mpich/Makefile > 1.38 +3 -0 ports/math/petsc/Makefile > 1.13 +3 -0 ports/math/scilab-toolbox-sivp/Makefile > 1.13 +3 -0 ports/misc/airoflash/Makefile > 1.29 +3 -0 ports/misc/kde3-i18n-hsb/Makefile > 1.60 +3 -0 ports/misc/kde3-i18n-mt/Makefile > 1.38 +3 -0 ports/misc/kde3-i18n-nso/Makefile > 1.27 +3 -0 ports/multimedia/moonlight/Makefile > 1.11 +3 -0 ports/multimedia/p5-Video-Info/Makefile > 1.16 +3 -0 ports/multimedia/xfmedia-remote-plugin/Makefile > 1.11 +3 -0 ports/net-im/pino/Makefile > 1.91 +3 -0 ports/net-p2p/gnunet/Makefile > 1.6 +3 -0 ports/net-p2p/py-bittorrent-core/Makefile > 1.66 +3 -0 ports/net-p2p/py-bittorrent/Makefile > 1.19 +3 -0 ports/net/perldap/Makefile > 1.5 +3 -0 ports/net/spnetkit/Makefile > 1.44 +3 -0 ports/palm/coldsync/Makefile > 1.20 +3 -0 ports/print/cups-magicolor/Makefile > 1.50 +3 -0 ports/science/hdf/Makefile > 1.7 +3 -0 ports/security/pantera/Makefile > 1.6 +3 -0 ports/sysutils/linux-megamgr/Makefile > 1.22 +3 -0 ports/sysutils/thunar-volman-plugin/Makefile > 1.84 +3 -0 ports/www/kazehakase/Makefile > 1.7 +3 -0 ports/x11-drivers/xf86-video-rdc/Makefile > 1.38 +3 -0 ports/x11-themes/gtk-qt-engine/Makefile > 1.5 +3 -0 ports/x11-themes/kde-icons-amaranth-althaea/Makefi= le > 1.3 +3 -0 ports/x11-themes/kde-icons-amaranth/Makefile > 1.7 +3 -0 ports/x11-themes/kde-icons-krystaline/Makefile > 1.3 +3 -0 ports/x11-themes/kde-icons-realistic/Makefile > 1.3 +3 -0 ports/x11-toolkits/xforms-i18n/Makefile > 1.3 +3 -0 ports/x11/avant-window-navigator-xfce4/Makefile > 1.6 +3 -0 ports/x11/cl-clx-sbcl/Makefile > 1.40 +3 -0 ports/x11/x3270/Makefile --=20 Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project gahr@FreeBSD.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp --Ls2Gy6y7jbHLe9Od Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+D+jkACgkQwMJqmJVx944TPACggMhIXl4HkYrUQ2VcJcId0ypk PTkAn0QH13NHsFQA1n1GEL9SH8J9LqTZ =FFSL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Ls2Gy6y7jbHLe9Od-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 11:00:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3950106566B for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:00:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559428FC0A for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:00:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl9 with SMTP id l9so2684743yen.13 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:00:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=Bx+cnAMriJCbhEMF56WmqdzuimfBSZlaFzgwdlhdUUc=; b=AHbx9cgkve8FLlfUnLTtDHby/BWKKY+W+mntaeEuuqRxt57G9vf3Re0nqcn9E33kTq A5gsXACLSnSWOE4lHFTSaBfuhzCXKef6W6psDbqbYtOsWsF3HhoSRKx/YmAXPiwXnunj WpWCQTG3It3EQ3Mr4+q1DLCPgmSUsb55ap+9/ogdFuZfoLbam/0/ANOYjwM5h3yR+YRb 7U/8pWGXL+wXB6CYR1+XtreNkqNQwlg96XlWTqGb4ZIZ4CfaePEWtYpltTi8F+GblYOF TseNmmRN6eAplEHpoV7jPKrxotdFrr3jhwn/LluwxC5hnueYL94N+XzjFAQiZNNhLnt1 nmJg== Received: by 10.101.137.39 with SMTP id p39mr2812624ann.57.1334055617479; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:00:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k35sm31351632ani.3.2012.04.10.04.00.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:00:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3VRllf6dtNz2CG5m for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:00:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:00:14 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120410070014.7a2ee2f7@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4F83FDE1.1050804@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4F7E498E.7070007@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F804679.2040803@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F80D4F9.9020207@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F836A65.7080402@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F837E27.8070503@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F83E7EC.10906@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F83FDE1.1050804@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnc7fydb6bGwM8QGVuX+6ifBSZaLIOv0EoNPzx6vwW/ym0LRQKHnywhFKdUx59UoIln4RVX Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba34-3.4.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:00:23 -0000 On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:31:13 +1000 Da Rock articulated: > > Also, please show the content of your /etc/make.conf, it could be > > that you are mangling include flags. > > make.conf: > > > end of make.conf ;) > > Well thats not entirely accurate, I only have a USE_OPENSSL_BASE and > the usual perl stuff and thats all. > > I get a bit of a kick out of that when someone asks if there's > something in the make.conf- I only use some of the kerberos options > on occasion when called for (not lately), but I learnt my lesson a > long time ago: don't touch the make.conf! I created some issues in > the past doing that... :) You have effectively shown us nothing. If you don't want to reveal the contents of your "make.conf" file, then simply say so. This poppycock nonsense about the "usual perl stuff" is useless. I checked, and I have exactly two lines that reference perl: # added by use.perl 2012-03-08 19:17:29 PERL_VERSION=5.14.2 Are these the "usual perl stuff" you are referencing? If so, then your "make.conf" file consists of only three lines; two if you don't count comments. Is that a correct statement? I have samba34-3.4.14 installed and it works fine and I did not have to mangle the "Makefile" or install additional software in order to accomplish that feat. Since you, according to you, appear to be the only user afflicted by this condition, it is readily apparent that the problem exists on your end. Your unwillingness to supply unredacted information and documentation raises doubts as to the validity of your claims. For grins, have you tried doing a "make rmconfig-recursive" in the samba port and then running something like: "portmanager net/samba34 -f -l" which would effectively rebuild samba and all of the ports it depends on? You should probably remove "libnet" or what ever extraneous port you installed to get samba to install in the first place first. While you are at it, move your "/etc/make.conf" file out of the way and have the port build with a truly "empty" file. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 11:41:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C49106566C for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:41:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67EFA8FC12 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B572A7E821 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:41:15 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4F841C45.6070003@acsalaska.net> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:40:53 +0200 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F7E498E.7070007@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F804679.2040803@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F80D4F9.9020207@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F836A65.7080402@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F837E27.8070503@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F83A595.9090806@acsalaska.net> <4F83B39B.3070301@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4F83B39B.3070301@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba34-3.4.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:41:18 -0000 On 4/10/2012 06:14, Da Rock wrote: > On 04/10/12 13:14, Mel Flynn wrote: >> On 4/10/2012 02:26, Da Rock wrote: >> >>> So what should the patch look like? Am I correct in my understanding of >>> the BUILD_DEPENDS, or have I chased a goose on that one? >> I'd like to divert your attention to the libnet source directory in >> samba distribution. It's built by default and integrated into pretty >> much every binary through libnetapi. >> Your focus should shift to the compilation error itself, your solution >> of installing the port libnet masked the actual problem. > I'll look into it then. I'm still trying to determine what sets it off. > I'm fairly sure ADS is a major factor, though simply disabling it merely > grows another failure elsewhere... :/ > > I'll start posting the logs soon. Is there a particular reason why a > dependency on libnet is an issue? If you'd just post the error message and the compilation line that caused it, there'd be a lot of info there that can narrow things down. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 11:45:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4EE106566B; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:45:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from culot@0xd0.org) Received: from 0xd0.org (0xd0.org [91.121.92.146]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D5C8FC08; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:45:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 0xd0.org (doudou.0xd0.org [172.16.0.254]) by 0xd0.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3ABjcPc061314; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:45:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from culot@0xd0.org) Received: (from culot@localhost) by 0xd0.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q3ABjcI9061313; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:45:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from culot) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:45:38 +0200 From: Frederic Culot To: Pietro Cerutti Message-ID: <20120410114537.GL17460@culot.org> References: <201204092351.q39Npi6F025202@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120410091537.GK98668@gahrfit.gahr.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120410091537.GK98668@gahrfit.gahr.ch> X-PGP-Key: http://culot.org/public/pgp-key.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, bapt@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/8kingdoms Makefile ports/misc/airoflash Makefile ports/graphics/autopano-sift Makefile ports/x11/avant-window-navigator-xfce4 Makefile ports/lang/boo Makefile ports/x11/cl-clx-sbcl Makefile ports/palm/coldsync ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:45:46 -0000 --z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > I have strong opinions against this, at least for ports with an active > maintainer. I really see these deprecation campaigns as treading on > somebody's toes. >=20 > I really like linimon's periodic emails "FreeBSD ports that you maintain > which are currently marked broken", which I see as a reminder that there > are ports of mine that require action, but going further than that and > deprecate a port that I maintain without even informing me in an > official way is not what I consider collaboration. >=20 > Even more so because I don't see any advantage in moving a port from > BROKEN to DEPRECATED state. If a user has a working version of the port > installed, he will stick to that, otherwise, installation will be frown > upon anyway. >=20 > I and bapt have already exchanged opinions on this subject more than > once, and I would now like to see what other people (other maintainers > in particular) think about it. >=20 > Can we please stop this? >=20 > --=20 > Pietro Cerutti > The FreeBSD Project > gahr@FreeBSD.org >=20 > PGP Public Key: > http://gahr.ch/pgp As you inquire people's opinion, I would say that I find this way of procee= ding a bit pushy and I consider it a good example of closed communication as I f= ind it: - non-caring: such a commit is a detached and impersonal way to give the information to a maintainer that has not unbroken his port for a long time - dogmatic: it looks like an unwillingness to accept the maintainer's point= of view or at least to hear about his work on maintaining the port - superior: deprecating without prior communication with the maintainer str= esses differences in status between portmgr/committer and maintainers Hence I am not surprised when you say you feel someone is treading on your = toes, and more generally I fear this does not do any good to maintainer's motivat= ion and commitment to the project. On the other hand I also believe those deprecation actions are necessary an= d I thank bapt for his work on this. To conciliate such a necessary action without hurting the feelings of those maintainers who despite their work could not update the state of their port= in a timely manner, maybe it would be good to be more verbose in the log of such commits. Inspired by linimon's emails, something like the following could be added: "As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeB= SD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been mark= ed as broken for a period of at least six months. As a maintainer of one of those ports, feel free to remove the deprecate status if you need more time to fi= x the breakage and do not hesitate to contact portmgr@ if you need additional information on this policy." I hope this brings something to the discussion. -- Frederic Culot culot@FreeBSD.org --z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+EHVsACgkQtzkaJjSHbFu0TACdEziSdBWtqmxJQEMOjBBJNijL 2pUAoKGsLGWbWpz1ZsAJn66qTreF67fw =0pa5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 11:46:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C988E106566B; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:46:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A5F8FC12; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 32C5D56205; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:46:24 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:46:24 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Erwin Lansing Message-ID: <20120410114624.GA2456@lonesome.com> References: <4F83F893.7040500@FreeBSD.org> <20120410091619.GS66606@droso.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120410091619.GS66606@droso.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: .if ARCH / BROKEN, or 'NOT_FOR_ARCH'? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:46:24 -0000 On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:16:19AM +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote: > BROKEN is for less permanent or unknown breakage, like errors on pointyhat > where the one analyzing the logs doesn't have detailed knownledge of each > port and its breakage, and is used as a warning to users, so they don't try > to build a port and get disappointed after installing all its dependencies, > and as a message to the maintainer that something is wrong. As a further clarification, we have a switch that we can throw on pointyhat to try to build things with BROKEN: '-trybroken'. We don't often do this, but should probably start doing so more often now that we have the hardware. Once something is marked with ARCHS it will not be attempted on pointyhat no matter what. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 11:56:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711A6106566B; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:56:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B848FC15; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 145B356205; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:56:30 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:56:30 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Frederic Culot Message-ID: <20120410115630.GB2456@lonesome.com> References: <201204092351.q39Npi6F025202@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120410091537.GK98668@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20120410114537.GL17460@culot.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120410114537.GL17460@culot.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, bapt@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, Pietro Cerutti Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/8kingdoms Makefile ports/misc/airoflash Makefile ports/graphics/autopano-sift Makefile ports/x11/avant-window-navigator-xfce4 Makefile ports/lang/boo Makefile ports/x11/cl-clx-sbcl Makefile ports/palm/coldsync ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:56:30 -0000 On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 01:45:38PM +0200, Frederic Culot wrote: > To conciliate such a necessary action without hurting the feelings of those > maintainers who despite their work could not update the state of their port in a > timely manner, maybe it would be good to be more verbose in the log of such > commits. Inspired by linimon's emails, something like the following could be > added: I do get some responses from maintainers to those emails, and (except in the cases where the email gets stuck in my mbox) I honor their requests for an extension. OTOH in general I get personal replies and not replies to the list, so people aren't seeing that interaction in public. >From my standpoint, by the time something has been broken for 6 months, the maintainer will have already gotten multiple emails from portsmon. So, I'm going to have to say I'm a little frustrated if I need to send another round of mail even on top of that. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 12:21:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0FD5106566C; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:21:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gahr@gahr.no-ip.org) Received: from cpanel05.rubas-s05.net (cpanel05.rubas-s05.net [195.182.222.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1A38FC0C; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 175-3.192-178.cust.bluewin.ch ([178.192.3.175] helo=gahr.no-ip.org) by cpanel05.rubas-s05.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SHa4s-0001tM-UG; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:21:42 +0200 Received: by gahr.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BBA124505F; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:21:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:21:42 +0200 From: Pietro Cerutti To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20120410122141.GA73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> References: <201204092351.q39Npi6F025202@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120410091537.GK98668@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20120410114537.GL17460@culot.org> <20120410115630.GB2456@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120410115630.GB2456@lonesome.com> X-PGP-Key: 0x9571F78E X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1203 92B5 3919 AF84 9B97 28D6 C0C2 6A98 9571 F78E User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cpanel05.rubas-s05.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - gahr.no-ip.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Frederic Culot , bapt@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/8kingdoms Makefile ports/misc/airoflash Makefile ports/graphics/autopano-sift Makefile ports/x11/avant-window-navigator-xfce4 Makefile ports/lang/boo Makefile ports/x11/cl-clx-sbcl Makefile ports/palm/coldsync ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gahr@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:21:44 -0000 --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2012-Apr-10, 06:56, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 01:45:38PM +0200, Frederic Culot wrote: > > To conciliate such a necessary action without hurting the feelings of t= hose > > maintainers who despite their work could not update the state of their = port in a > > timely manner, maybe it would be good to be more verbose in the log of = such > > commits. Inspired by linimon's emails, something like the following cou= ld be > > added: >=20 > I do get some responses from maintainers to those emails, and (except > in the cases where the email gets stuck in my mbox) I honor their requests > for an extension. OTOH in general I get personal replies and not replies > to the list, so people aren't seeing that interaction in public. >=20 > From my standpoint, by the time something has been broken for 6 months, > the maintainer will have already gotten multiple emails from portsmon. > So, I'm going to have to say I'm a little frustrated if I need to send > another round of mail even on top of that. That's exactly my point: maintainers are very likely to know the situation by the time these deprecation campaigns set off, and committing to their ports without prior approval is in contrast with our policy. I still do not see the necessity to deprecate maintained ports, even though a port might be maintained as broken for a long period of time. The maintainer might be waiting for something to happen either upstream or in our infrastructure, which could release the port from brokenness. --=20 Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project gahr@FreeBSD.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+EJdUACgkQwMJqmJVx945iawCeKwOswiUrwD9T1W68V/8yXPpZ NuEAn22EjoshP779m2cjxcKX0VkHmvVA =KRWJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 12:32:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A92106566C; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:32:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from araujobsdport@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B558FC18; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghrr20 with SMTP id r20so2739392ghr.13 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 05:32:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SrEqxVM52D7S6q/yCajZfZ1dnSLAQdAn/aXFKfxvblA=; b=Vp1B8PbclM6EQYP6hi6/7SkSSfhsDeWtPVg2G+i1ztFO9eGX+FzsZsGHxrJ/UL41fB SIaE9qHOEQnFXzMtBChMTlYa50FfR7Do46rIprnWOTB5RQNI+n2Rg1jzc9i053z7FMoe aBylSeCSoAakrkYtRGpjKHGhUmQRcsH4sohnaj0KGoWVVfHo2SXCRecqjUa2yOr/yZu0 1FnVgIzxJnw2Z1wmJoCfjunPQkcOls8fe+t6cB5AgQn4+9Yku+ei/K0K8ciIjBEaIY6V S0zQaTXPM6qUe56qDSw6zqUZeLd/oGojEyGYa97Y80g1w8Hi5pCEocwRm7j2wjM2LDE4 ghgg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.186.129 with SMTP id fk1mr2060147igc.73.1334061167411; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 05:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.183.203 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 05:32:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120410115630.GB2456@lonesome.com> References: <201204092351.q39Npi6F025202@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120410091537.GK98668@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20120410114537.GL17460@culot.org> <20120410115630.GB2456@lonesome.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:32:47 -0300 Message-ID: From: Marcelo Araujo To: Mark Linimon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: bapt@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, Frederic Culot , Pietro Cerutti , cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/8kingdoms Makefile ports/misc/airoflash Makefile ports/graphics/autopano-sift Makefile ports/x11/avant-window-navigator-xfce4 Makefile ports/lang/boo Makefile ports/x11/cl-clx-sbcl Makefile ports/palm/coldsync ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: araujo@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:32:49 -0000 2012/4/10 Mark Linimon > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 01:45:38PM +0200, Frederic Culot wrote: > > To conciliate such a necessary action without hurting the feelings of > those > > maintainers who despite their work could not update the state of their > port in a > > timely manner, maybe it would be good to be more verbose in the log of > such > > commits. Inspired by linimon's emails, something like the following > could be > > added: > > I do get some responses from maintainers to those emails, and (except > in the cases where the email gets stuck in my mbox) I honor their requests > for an extension. OTOH in general I get personal replies and not replies > to the list, so people aren't seeing that interaction in public. > > From my standpoint, by the time something has been broken for 6 months, > the maintainer will have already gotten multiple emails from portsmon. > So, I'm going to have to say I'm a little frustrated if I need to send > another round of mail even on top of that. > > I strongly agree with the bapt's action to set some ports that are often broken to deprecated or even some of them that are broken for a long time to deprecated. There is nothing more frustrating than try to install a port an it doesn't fetch or doesn't build. Also to avoid some problems with fetch, we can use public distfile or even mirror the tarball/zipball(or whatever it is) in a fashion way. And in my opinion a bunch of new emails with some warnings could be useful just in the beggining, after while those ports maybe will have still problem to be fetch. Maybe something that might work would be something quite similar like the QAT provided by itetcu a long time ago, send some message to the developers@ list and wait for someone to fix that. Best Regards, -- Marcelo Araujo araujo@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 12:33:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7394C106566C; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:33:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE4F8FC12; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBFED2.dip.t-dialin.net [217.251.254.210]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q3ACXktx048117; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:33:47 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3ACZIcP057549; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:35:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3ACYniS011864; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:34:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201204101234.q3ACYniS011864@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Chris Rees From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Mon, 09 Apr 2012 18:09:20 -0000." Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:34:49 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: Mark Linimon , Scot Hetzel , Boris Samorodov , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:33:50 -0000 Hi Chris, > I understand your viewpoint, but given the horrible experiences > certain people had on this kind of thing (you were around then, too), > I think that the 'make a fork and port that instead' is perfectly > reasonable. At least then the software has a maintainer. > > Chris OK, if people will repack rather than loosing; though creating replacement ports wrappers with new names will be hastle not only for freebsd.org, but also for FreeBSD users who may have their own overlay trees of eg ports/*/Makefile.local with SUBDIR+= a port. (hastle of variant SUBDIR += needing to be maintained for different uname -r bases for various local hosts). When a generic author causes trouble, trying to unpublish published sources, I suggest FreeBSD insures itself against more trouble by adding a list of people prepared to witness they saw the published sources with attached licence, at which URL, on what date. Witnesses need not be users of a port, nor programmers (so a wider pool). If some witnesses are non users of a port, it may be seen as more independent. Maintainer of mail/imaptools (Boris) is welcome to add me to a list of witnesses: Distfile:\ SIZE:\ MD5:\ URL:\ WITNESS:\ CONTACT:\ DATE imap_tools_V1.135.tar.gz:\ 108952:\ a7c34141b7512bff69f6ea86952c83bb:\ http://ftp7.freebsd.org/sites/ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/%5Bpage=123%5D \ -> \ http://ftp7.freebsd.org/sites/ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/imap_tools_V1.135.tar.gz\ Julian H. Stacey:\ http://berklix.com/~jhs/contact/:\ Tue Apr 10 14:30:17 CEST 2012 Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 12:35:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F161065672; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:35:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF87C8FC15; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:35:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 76B2B56205; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:35:14 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:35:14 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Pietro Cerutti Message-ID: <20120410123514.GD5264@lonesome.com> References: <201204092351.q39Npi6F025202@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120410091537.GK98668@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20120410114537.GL17460@culot.org> <20120410115630.GB2456@lonesome.com> <20120410122141.GA73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120410122141.GA73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Frederic Culot , bapt@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/8kingdoms Makefile ports/misc/airoflash Makefile ports/graphics/autopano-sift Makefile ports/x11/avant-window-navigator-xfce4 Makefile ports/lang/boo Makefile ports/x11/cl-clx-sbcl Makefile ports/palm/coldsync ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:35:15 -0000 On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 02:21:42PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > The maintainer might be waiting for something to happen either upstream > or in our infrastructure, which could release the port from brokenness. Putting a comment about that in the Makefile might go a long way to minimizing frustration all around. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 12:40:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76520106566B; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:40:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F1C8FC17; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:40:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 0E4DF56205; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:40:09 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:40:09 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: araujo@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20120410124009.GE5264@lonesome.com> References: <201204092351.q39Npi6F025202@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120410091537.GK98668@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20120410114537.GL17460@culot.org> <20120410115630.GB2456@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: bapt@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, Frederic Culot , Pietro Cerutti , cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/8kingdoms Makefile ports/misc/airoflash Makefile ports/graphics/autopano-sift Makefile ports/x11/avant-window-navigator-xfce4 Makefile ports/lang/boo Makefile ports/x11/cl-clx-sbcl Makefile ports/palm/coldsync ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:40:09 -0000 On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:32:47AM -0300, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > There is nothing more frustrating than try to install a port and it > doesn't fetch or doesn't build. That's been my main point of worry all along (more personally than as portmgr), and why I think the deprecation campaigns do more good than harm. Obviously some folks do not agree :-/ We'll have to agree to disagree on that point. I'll also note that not every port that gets deprecated actually gets removed. In English we have this saying "the carrot and the stick". I'd certainly rather use the carrot than the stick, but sometimes the stick (setting DEPRECATED) is effective. Finally, I agree that FreeBSD can't "guarantee" any given ports will work, but I think we owe the users the effort to make sure if a port is included, it's at least not completely useless. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 12:44:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2056106564A; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:44:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gahr@gahr.no-ip.org) Received: from cpanel05.rubas-s05.net (cpanel05.rubas-s05.net [195.182.222.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C6A8FC08; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 175-3.192-178.cust.bluewin.ch ([178.192.3.175] helo=gahr.no-ip.org) by cpanel05.rubas-s05.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SHaRG-0006n7-9h; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:44:50 +0200 Received: by gahr.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 52BE94505F; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:44:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:44:50 +0200 From: Pietro Cerutti To: araujo@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20120410124449.GB73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> References: <201204092351.q39Npi6F025202@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120410091537.GK98668@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20120410114537.GL17460@culot.org> <20120410115630.GB2456@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: 0x9571F78E X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1203 92B5 3919 AF84 9B97 28D6 C0C2 6A98 9571 F78E User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cpanel05.rubas-s05.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - gahr.no-ip.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: bapt@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, Frederic Culot , cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/8kingdoms Makefile ports/misc/airoflash Makefile ports/graphics/autopano-sift Makefile ports/x11/avant-window-navigator-xfce4 Makefile ports/lang/boo Makefile ports/x11/cl-clx-sbcl Makefile ports/palm/coldsync ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gahr@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:44:52 -0000 --MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2012-Apr-10, 09:32, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > 2012/4/10 Mark Linimon >=20 > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 01:45:38PM +0200, Frederic Culot wrote: > > > To conciliate such a necessary action without hurting the feelings of > > those > > > maintainers who despite their work could not update the state of their > > port in a > > > timely manner, maybe it would be good to be more verbose in the log of > > such > > > commits. Inspired by linimon's emails, something like the following > > could be > > > added: > > > > I do get some responses from maintainers to those emails, and (except > > in the cases where the email gets stuck in my mbox) I honor their reque= sts > > for an extension. OTOH in general I get personal replies and not repli= es > > to the list, so people aren't seeing that interaction in public. > > > > From my standpoint, by the time something has been broken for 6 months, > > the maintainer will have already gotten multiple emails from portsmon. > > So, I'm going to have to say I'm a little frustrated if I need to send > > another round of mail even on top of that. > > > > > I strongly agree with the bapt's action to set some ports that are often > broken to deprecated or even some of them that are broken for a long time > to deprecated. >=20 > There is nothing more frustrating than try to install a port an it doesn't > fetch or doesn't build. I might agree on that. But how is a DEPRECATED port better than a BROKEN one in this regard? --=20 Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project gahr@FreeBSD.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp --MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+EK0EACgkQwMJqmJVx946M1gCgubu6IJLJpEh0eLYGZzgYN1FF UdIAn30H+0XciAoBmgDTz8BJ+5vraQZg =Hn2u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 12:56:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953471065687; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:56:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@passap.ru) Received: from forward12.mail.yandex.net (forward12.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B308FC0C; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp11.mail.yandex.net (smtp11.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.67]) by forward12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 50490C2239B; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:56:01 +0400 (MSK) Received: from smtp11.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp11.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id F38B07E04C1; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:56:00 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 87.249.28.58.tel.ru (87.249.28.58.tel.ru [87.249.28.58]) by smtp11.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id u0QG0QuE-u0QqjTKj; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:56:00 +0400 Message-ID: <4F842DE0.6090509@passap.ru> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:56:00 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120214 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Julian H. Stacey" References: <201204101234.q3ACYniS011864@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: <201204101234.q3ACYniS011864@fire.js.berklix.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chris Rees , Mark Linimon , Scot Hetzel , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:56:03 -0000 On 10.04.2012 16:34, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Maintainer of mail/imaptools (Boris) is welcome to add me to a list of witnesses: Thanks for your help but there is no need at the particular case. The port was fixed yesterday and the distfile is at FreeBSD distfile server. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 13:04:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002DA106566C for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:04:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9304C8FC17 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:04:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghrr20 with SMTP id r20so2762839ghr.13 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:04:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=E3Zr1KsvVY02P7xXhq8cHUgtQnk5+DhWaSBAK+WEY9A=; b=exgBMPpxQnWSp5uo8r1rQlcap5ohthK/K2LI417DOeuJPCsorQ8asFAOrKVc+xBMwq V9f11hO3puGaf81VDo/rb6zzrG+j1dP+b4A9W0xJc54I6Jj3n+xRvfnnL2KWrrOEWKgb gF+I0KkzPOIa7oCJlcKJQiOOc/CKxtNtNFkCoGdjv73NJ/4GbP/MqF8/k/qAG7SZJRAe C1UsTzZS9CtTT0yvbIYMg7Ki2dOVvHpTWhIyFFn9fxQ9CbPzyBf4X5iF0wUIIQoBwxCJ c9JRRzYD7z0y57UbMy1tLxiALOTGsF7YgiiE7LPZwblM8UlJMnvTwr2I7wJNdzmza7gr ZTAg== Received: by 10.100.244.26 with SMTP id r26mr2887877anh.53.1334063067098; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p18sm31842776ano.20.2012.04.10.06.04.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:04:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3VRpVw4shPz2CG5m for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:04:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:04:24 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120410090424.5511702c@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120410124009.GE5264@lonesome.com> References: <201204092351.q39Npi6F025202@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120410091537.GK98668@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20120410114537.GL17460@culot.org> <20120410115630.GB2456@lonesome.com> <20120410124009.GE5264@lonesome.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkEgIjXK0opZfUxWjnZOvxJUwXJfDo4qlUFyr4yc2t/okKYq2/SbMoZ3gw+VEUHVVzkd14+ Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/8kingdoms Makefile ports/misc/airoflash Makefile ports/graphics/autopano-sift Makefile ports/x11/avant-window-navigator-xfce4 Makefile ports/lang/boo Makefile ports/x11/cl-clx-sbcl Makefile ports/palm/coldsync ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:04:28 -0000 On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:40:09 -0500 Mark Linimon articulated: > Finally, I agree that FreeBSD can't "guarantee" any given ports will > work, but I think we owe the users the effort to make sure if a port > is included, it's at least not completely useless. To "guarantee" that the port will work is certainly beyond the scope of the ports system; however, to guarantee that it is fetch-able and build-able is an implied action by the simple fact that it is included in the ports structure. If, after a reasonable amount of time, a solution for a port's inability to properly build or if the port is just plain not able to be fetched, then it should be removed from the port system. There is no upside to keeping ports that will not build, or cannot be fetched. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 13:27:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F7F7106566C; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:27:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCFD08FC08; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:27:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBFED2.dip.t-dialin.net [217.251.254.210]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q3ADR7rR048632; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:27:08 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3ADSdld057766; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:28:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3ADS8v6012383; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:28:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201204101328.q3ADS8v6012383@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Boris Samorodov From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:56:00 +0400." <4F842DE0.6090509@passap.ru> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:28:08 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: Chris Rees , Mark Linimon , Scot Hetzel , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:27:10 -0000 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On 10.04.2012 16:34, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > Maintainer of mail/imaptools (Boris) is welcome to add me to a list of witnesses: > > Thanks for your help but there is no need at the particular case. > The port was fixed yesterday and the distfile is at FreeBSD distfile > server. OK, thanks. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 13:35:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9551C106566B for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:35:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0CB8FC12 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D3AD7E837 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 05:35:12 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4F8436FB.4070000@acsalaska.net> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:34:51 +0200 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <201204092351.q39Npi6F025202@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120410091537.GK98668@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20120410114537.GL17460@culot.org> <20120410115630.GB2456@lonesome.com> <20120410124449.GB73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> In-Reply-To: <20120410124449.GB73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/8kingdoms Makefile ports/misc/airoflash Makefile ports/graphics/autopano-sift Makefile ports/x11/avant-window-navigator-xfce4 Makefile ports/lang/boo Makefile ports/x11/cl-clx-sbcl Makefile ports/palm/coldsync ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:35:16 -0000 On 4/10/2012 14:44, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > I might agree on that. But how is a DEPRECATED port better than a BROKEN > one in this regard? In theory, it tickles administrators to look for alternatives if they depend on the port or fork a working copy of the port in their local infrastructure and provides a deadline for this to action to be completed. BROKEN is supposed to be a temporary state, leading to a fix. DEPRECATED is a temporary state leading to removal. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 14:00:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8441C106564A; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:00:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com) Received: from idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca (idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350698FC1B; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pd3ml2so-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.141.138]) by pd4mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 10 Apr 2012 08:00:25 -0600 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=w8ylZ/s5/CpB4NtJ57cq/Y3wf+h+jIFeVVN4WVEh/uc= c=1 sm=1 a=rUrS5ZphJAYA:10 a=QrugwKR0C_UA:10 a=wAGQQ9Az6v0A:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=ICAaq7hcmGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=IbtKDeXwb2+SRU442/pi3A==:17 a=BWvPGDcYAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=kagqW63r4v7asJ7i6KgA:9 a=v3Bw4fk7f5W5M-5wLI8A:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=V7tsTZBp22UA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Received: from unknown (HELO spqr.komquats.com) ([96.50.7.119]) by pd3ml2so-dmz.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 10 Apr 2012 08:00:25 -0600 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [10.1.1.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5752B5; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:00:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slippy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3AE0OKq004332; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:00:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com) Message-Id: <201204101400.q3AE0OKq004332@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3 From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.komquats.com/ To: Chris Rees In-Reply-To: Message from Chris Rees of "Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:43:32 -0000." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:00:24 -0700 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: Time to kill php4, who stands up to save it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Cy Schubert List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:00:26 -0000 In message , Chris Rees writes: > --0015174c427a04100904bd4d714b > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 10 Apr 2012 04:50, "Cy Schubert" wrote: > > > > In message <20120409220442.GE90364@azathoth.lan>, Baptiste Daroussin > writes: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Apparently we are still sheaping php4 and his friends, which is EOLed by > > > upstream since 2008. > > > > > > on the ports tree we have two consumer of php4, once which seems to be > able t > > > o > > > run with php5 according to upstream website and the second which > already have > > > a > > > newer version using php5 in the ports tree. > > > > > > So if you really have reason to save php4, please stand up. > > > > I see no reason to keep php4. > > > > On a tangential issue, php52 should probably be kept around, at least for > > now. > > The PHP maintainer disagreed on this point last week-ish. Then ports which break should be removed as well. One of my websites broke when I upgraded PHP from 5.3 to 5.5. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 14:20:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B991065670; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:20:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from araujobsdport@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1823C8FC16; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:20:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so2827343yhg.13 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:20:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=AmMBY0wpV7S7rnZA1VLsIcd7ODxj8ZAOd49lIFGRxUk=; b=tV0Gy5vYfa0DeW4VEFPQIopjedcXchxeTt7xCU7tMioRao7HGZBZBAnCiBQX+4Qe8P z+TGNzY1i+RHX7IZIHyj1rJJZtHHoXOamybbmEkc1OAyCUWJdfAL/D4YfTj5R88JU+Dp HtcqUodcDPPpkJwTj21Wslv0CA/0aF5kIJCwepByYloDObxasnnVlEXNRgRgydhslIqO Ep/CaRVNt531Xk98EinpJR2WkeQIioHRB2Fgm79wEqKFT4NFz532D1CTz6wEI7Yfcr6N Xbnx+yh6oCOsDi2Fue/fZvuo73yRSqAjhSsrJLdUyrDcHEliqWrgrImovcc0n+O8Dt69 P7Aw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.216.136 with SMTP id oq8mr2541621igc.63.1334067656347; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:20:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.183.203 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:20:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120410124449.GB73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> References: <201204092351.q39Npi6F025202@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120410091537.GK98668@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20120410114537.GL17460@culot.org> <20120410115630.GB2456@lonesome.com> <20120410124449.GB73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:20:56 -0300 Message-ID: From: Marcelo Araujo To: gahr@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: bapt@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, Frederic Culot , cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/8kingdoms Makefile ports/misc/airoflash Makefile ports/graphics/autopano-sift Makefile ports/x11/avant-window-navigator-xfce4 Makefile ports/lang/boo Makefile ports/x11/cl-clx-sbcl Makefile ports/palm/coldsync ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: araujo@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:20:59 -0000 2012/4/10 Pietro Cerutti > > > I might agree on that. But how is a DEPRECATED port better than a BROKEN > one in this regard? > > In my point of view, no make sense have a bunch of ports that actually doesn't works or because there is a fetch problem or even it is set as BROKEN. Who never was upset when need and find a port but it is BROKEN for some reason, In my view, have a port BROKEN or haven't it, is the same. Of course, I mean when a port is BROKEN for all plataforms as well as for all FreeBSD version. I believe set it as DEPRECATED is a good way to make the maintainer take attention to fix it soon as possible, due he has put effort to insert this software on the ports tree in the past. In case that has any issue related with the ports framework that make the ports be broken, he can ping any developer to give him more time to fix or even rollback the DEPRECATED commit with a proper message on the commit's log. It also will let us know, what's happen with that port and maybe someone else could give a hand to help the maintainer to fix it. Best Regards, -- Marcelo Araujo araujo@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 14:47:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0EF9106566C; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:47:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gahr@gahr.no-ip.org) Received: from cpanel05.rubas-s05.net (cpanel05.rubas-s05.net [195.182.222.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207348FC14; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:47:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 175-3.192-178.cust.bluewin.ch ([178.192.3.175] helo=gahr.no-ip.org) by cpanel05.rubas-s05.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SHcMB-0007dD-9b; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:47:43 +0200 Received: by gahr.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0F3354505F; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:47:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:47:41 +0200 From: Pietro Cerutti To: araujo@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20120410144741.GC73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> References: <201204092351.q39Npi6F025202@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120410091537.GK98668@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20120410114537.GL17460@culot.org> <20120410115630.GB2456@lonesome.com> <20120410124449.GB73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kfjH4zxOES6UT95V" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: 0x9571F78E X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1203 92B5 3919 AF84 9B97 28D6 C0C2 6A98 9571 F78E User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cpanel05.rubas-s05.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - gahr.no-ip.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: bapt@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, Frederic Culot , cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/8kingdoms Makefile ports/misc/airoflash Makefile ports/graphics/autopano-sift Makefile ports/x11/avant-window-navigator-xfce4 Makefile ports/lang/boo Makefile ports/x11/cl-clx-sbcl Makefile ports/palm/coldsync ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gahr@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:47:45 -0000 --kfjH4zxOES6UT95V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2012-Apr-10, 11:20, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > 2012/4/10 Pietro Cerutti > > > > > > I might agree on that. But how is a DEPRECATED port better than a BROKEN > > one in this regard? > > > > > In my point of view, no make sense have a bunch of ports that actually > doesn't works or because there is a fetch problem or even it is set as > BROKEN. Who never was upset when need and find a port but it is BROKEN for > some reason, In my view, have a port BROKEN or haven't it, is the same. Of > course, I mean when a port is BROKEN for all plataforms as well as for all > FreeBSD version. I agree on that. >=20 > I believe set it as DEPRECATED is a good way to make the maintainer take > attention to fix it soon as possible, due he has put effort to insert this > software on the ports tree in the past. What about submitting a PR, as we usually do for anything else? If it's ok to wait 15 days (maintainer timeout) to commit an update to a port that brings in important features, it is even more so to wait to deprecate one. > In case that has any issue related with the ports framework that make the > ports be broken, he can ping any developer to give him more time to fix or > even rollback the DEPRECATED commit with a proper message on the commit's > log. This is awkward. We're not supposed to spend our time rolling back unwanted commits. We're supposed to make sure that a commit made to someone else's port is wanted in the first place. > It also will let us know, what's happen with that port and maybe someone > else could give a hand to help the maintainer to fix it. Well, as I see it, marking a port as DEPRECATED is kind of a final decision. I.e., I'll start to look at alternatives and forget about it. If you mark a port as DEPRECATED and 12 hours later I back off your chance with a comment "I'm working on it", a really unconsistent and confused message will pass. --=20 Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project gahr@FreeBSD.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp --kfjH4zxOES6UT95V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+ESA0ACgkQwMJqmJVx947+UQCgs7tk7eBZcI52xCD5Ntn+54Oc m2wAnid+1bfqh2GIg63OXwmbULdvWzOj =gTA9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kfjH4zxOES6UT95V-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 14:56:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D65106566B for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:56:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gahr@gahr.no-ip.org) Received: from cpanel05.rubas-s05.net (cpanel05.rubas-s05.net [195.182.222.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF498FC08 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:56:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 175-3.192-178.cust.bluewin.ch ([178.192.3.175] helo=gahr.no-ip.org) by cpanel05.rubas-s05.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SHcUk-0000vL-Ee for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:56:34 +0200 Received: by gahr.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 529264505F; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:56:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:56:33 +0200 From: Pietro Cerutti To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120410145632.GD73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> References: <201204092351.q39Npi6F025202@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120410091537.GK98668@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20120410114537.GL17460@culot.org> <20120410115630.GB2456@lonesome.com> <20120410124009.GE5264@lonesome.com> <20120410090424.5511702c@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120410090424.5511702c@scorpio> X-PGP-Key: 0x9571F78E X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1203 92B5 3919 AF84 9B97 28D6 C0C2 6A98 9571 F78E User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cpanel05.rubas-s05.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - gahr.no-ip.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/8kingdoms Makefile ports/misc/airoflash Makefile ports/graphics/autopano-sift Makefile ports/x11/avant-window-navigator-xfce4 Makefile ports/lang/boo Makefile ports/x11/cl-clx-sbcl Makefile ports/palm/coldsync ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gahr@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:56:36 -0000 --jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2012-Apr-10, 09:04, Jerry wrote: > On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:40:09 -0500 > Mark Linimon articulated: >=20 > > Finally, I agree that FreeBSD can't "guarantee" any given ports will > > work, but I think we owe the users the effort to make sure if a port > > is included, it's at least not completely useless. >=20 > To "guarantee" that the port will work is certainly beyond the scope > of the ports system; however, to guarantee that it is fetch-able > and build-able is an implied action by the simple fact that it is > included in the ports structure. If, after a reasonable amount of time, > a solution for a port's inability to properly build or if the port is > just plain not able to be fetched, then it should be removed from the > port system. There is no upside to keeping ports that will not build, > or cannot be fetched. For the record, the port in question was fetchable / buildable / runnable. For some reason, some python class sometimes doesn't get byte-compiled, resulting in packaging (PLIST) errors. --=20 Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project gahr@FreeBSD.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp --jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEUEARECAAYFAk+ESiAACgkQwMJqmJVx944HHgCfV3GJtIfR3vrlv0kj2c/bjHnx rhgAmMGnIbNg/2VGzGftishm35yZxC8= =yP0x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 15:14:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0597C106566B; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:14:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from araujobsdport@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C76A8FC0A; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:14:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so10051137iah.13 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:14:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0iHhEGegmuLnuboVH9hIbGqQa1VtHKNHIBC5goUxXmM=; b=oR+nncxOkErDnHQ64JvNfohnXZS479stB3uaJ5RXhhiSp2hliFJkj+MKkwvamKmJaB A48KLKYYVvHR/U/g+OPofJFvOJ5Fi+AJzyrjO8xLXZudANQ+5m3qsgZjSTD+ZUfa2CBF Ay+JRm1VaJOnDAaB+jMtC3aTKyt9D3bCJpW3OuFSUXAa8w4kaihbYm9q1Ra+3cu5BRN4 HU8t58CNBZ5j+PjUTkBZfqW/p7beKvIAivvDzvTuFncKXTzakf5JBuP44HCxxkPnC8fH UGgmnOkopr64UR73OPCI5Pn+ORb+jZjoIEDU/2JwcOmT6m2YBYyMXJAYfCujNKZEMw7l ovRQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.46.167 with SMTP id w7mr2729260igm.73.1334070863614; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.183.203 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:14:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120410144741.GC73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> References: <201204092351.q39Npi6F025202@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120410091537.GK98668@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20120410114537.GL17460@culot.org> <20120410115630.GB2456@lonesome.com> <20120410124449.GB73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20120410144741.GC73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:14:23 -0300 Message-ID: From: Marcelo Araujo To: gahr@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: bapt@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, Frederic Culot , cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/8kingdoms Makefile ports/misc/airoflash Makefile ports/graphics/autopano-sift Makefile ports/x11/avant-window-navigator-xfce4 Makefile ports/lang/boo Makefile ports/x11/cl-clx-sbcl Makefile ports/palm/coldsync ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: araujo@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:14:25 -0000 2012/4/10 Pietro Cerutti > On 2012-Apr-10, 11:20, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > > 2012/4/10 Pietro Cerutti > > > > > > > > > I might agree on that. But how is a DEPRECATED port better than a > BROKEN > > > one in this regard? > > > > > > > > In my point of view, no make sense have a bunch of ports that actually > > doesn't works or because there is a fetch problem or even it is set as > > BROKEN. Who never was upset when need and find a port but it is BROKEN > for > > some reason, In my view, have a port BROKEN or haven't it, is the same. > Of > > course, I mean when a port is BROKEN for all plataforms as well as for > all > > FreeBSD version. > > I agree on that. > > > > > I believe set it as DEPRECATED is a good way to make the maintainer tak= e > > attention to fix it soon as possible, due he has put effort to insert > this > > software on the ports tree in the past. > > What about submitting a PR, as we usually do for anything else? If it's > ok to wait 15 days (maintainer timeout) to commit an update to a port > that brings in important features, it is even more so to wait to > deprecate one. > That is a very good point, if someone send a PR, nobody need to make it DEPRECATED, but unfortunately, sometimes it doesn=92t happens. And as I can see, almost all ports that switch from BROKEN to DEPRECATED, is because no one send a PR. > > > In case that has any issue related with the ports framework that make t= he > > ports be broken, he can ping any developer to give him more time to fix > or > > even rollback the DEPRECATED commit with a proper message on the commit= 's > > log. > > This is awkward. We're not supposed to spend our time rolling back > unwanted commits. We're supposed to make sure that a commit made to > someone else's port is wanted in the first place. > I agree with you, maybe there is another better way. > > > It also will let us know, what's happen with that port and maybe someon= e > > else could give a hand to help the maintainer to fix it. > > Well, as I see it, marking a port as DEPRECATED is kind of a final > decision. I.e., I'll start to look at alternatives and forget about it. > If you mark a port as DEPRECATED and 12 hours later I back off your > chance with a comment "I'm working on it", a really unconsistent and > confused message will pass. > Here depends! Usually when I need a port that is set as DEPRECATED, first I take a look why it is set like this, and then, I start to looking for an alternative in case I can=92t fix that port or it is really obsolete becaus= e the software is dead for some reason. Best Regards, --=20 Marcelo Araujo araujo@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 15:18:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97AF2106566C; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:18:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590498FC08; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86BF7E849; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:18:07 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4F844F19.8070005@acsalaska.net> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:17:45 +0200 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gahr@freebsd.org References: <201204092351.q39Npi6F025202@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120410091537.GK98668@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20120410114537.GL17460@culot.org> <20120410115630.GB2456@lonesome.com> <20120410124449.GB73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20120410144741.GC73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> In-Reply-To: <20120410144741.GC73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/8kingdoms Makefile ports/misc/airoflash Makefile ports/graphics/autopano-sift Makefile ports/x11/avant-window-navigator-xfce4 Makefile ports/lang/boo Makefile ports/x11/cl-clx-sbcl Makefile ports/palm/coldsync ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:18:09 -0000 On 4/10/2012 16:47, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 2012-Apr-10, 11:20, Marcelo Araujo wrote: >> 2012/4/10 Pietro Cerutti >>> >>> >>> I might agree on that. But how is a DEPRECATED port better than a BROKEN >>> one in this regard? >>> >>> >> In my point of view, no make sense have a bunch of ports that actually >> doesn't works or because there is a fetch problem or even it is set as >> BROKEN. Who never was upset when need and find a port but it is BROKEN for >> some reason, In my view, have a port BROKEN or haven't it, is the same. Of >> course, I mean when a port is BROKEN for all plataforms as well as for all >> FreeBSD version. > > I agree on that. > >> >> I believe set it as DEPRECATED is a good way to make the maintainer take >> attention to fix it soon as possible, due he has put effort to insert this >> software on the ports tree in the past. > > What about submitting a PR, as we usually do for anything else? If it's > ok to wait 15 days (maintainer timeout) to commit an update to a port > that brings in important features, it is even more so to wait to > deprecate one. Not to discredit your work in any way, but 6 months of being BROKEN can be classified as maintainer timeout in the general case. Also given the error you're seeing it sounds like a very specific case that shouldn't affect the generally solid deprecation policy that is in effect - the bulk of the deprecation cases are upstream abandonware with an equally absent maintainer. I check the list of deprecated ports regularly when I feel nostalgic for , java-based rollover menus and "News" from the previous millennium. On a more constructive note - why don't you mention the specific port? Maybe some of us on the list can help you figure out why some files sometimes don't get byte compiled or provide you with a work-around solution (dynamically generated plist comes to mind). -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 15:23:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D474B106564A; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:23:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304F98FC19; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:23:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so5580357bkc.13 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:23:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=itgFg7tRi0qugPWS21nWZa3zIE4Lhm7mVuJPA8EAkvI=; b=Aa9nMBvk4DTSQy4adCkhk1rmB498ol/bfDZXqjFykOXmsZhqcjODUUz0+d8KM9M+FS RqKexJzCbW64TXVfeqIPK0a3z1Nx8nswFISvW+4ehdaBHQ9ZqNceKdQjmICYAfLrS8vP 2fCQVcB2a6VajnzG1yp6E6ZeP7Dih3rkGNHOzD4gR90ZA0nqq0cAUPIUSu2BO439WhK2 ITZyMVASQqnKu2YRpQrtSpJ3tM6ZhWUqzxthaAAoSjcgQtYvqg9yOcNTT982S+n9OSHp 1M1MP5N2ZWFKpUbASKRir6LLRHm8Om2tjmEDgn0MEOvi9PTQlYH6g9e5h5aEhadn2Zml c2Ww== Received: by 10.204.150.86 with SMTP id x22mr4976276bkv.136.1334071429271; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:23:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:23:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120410145632.GD73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> References: <201204092351.q39Npi6F025202@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120410091537.GK98668@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20120410114537.GL17460@culot.org> <20120410115630.GB2456@lonesome.com> <20120410124009.GE5264@lonesome.com> <20120410090424.5511702c@scorpio> <20120410145632.GD73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> From: Chris Rees Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:23:19 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: YI5d0EAX-B4-WPi_m7VF2I1ITlU Message-ID: To: gahr@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/8kingdoms Makefile ports/misc/airoflash Makefile ports/graphics/autopano-sift Makefile ports/x11/avant-window-navigator-xfce4 Makefile ports/lang/boo Makefile ports/x11/cl-clx-sbcl Makefile ports/palm/coldsync ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:23:50 -0000 On 10 April 2012 14:56, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 2012-Apr-10, 09:04, Jerry wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:40:09 -0500 >> Mark Linimon articulated: >> >> > Finally, I agree that FreeBSD can't "guarantee" any given ports will >> > work, but I think we owe the users the effort to make sure if a port >> > is included, it's at least not completely useless. >> >> To "guarantee" that the port will work is certainly beyond the scope >> of the ports system; however, to guarantee that it is fetch-able >> and build-able is an implied action by the simple fact that it is >> included in the ports structure. If, after a reasonable amount of time, >> a solution for a port's inability to properly build or if the port is >> just plain not able to be fetched, then it should be removed from the >> port system. There is no upside to keeping ports that will not build, >> or cannot be fetched. > > For the record, the port in question was fetchable / buildable / > runnable. For some reason, some python class sometimes doesn't get > byte-compiled, resulting in packaging (PLIST) errors. > BUILD_ENV= PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=yes usually helps. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 15:30:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F4A1065679 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:30:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gahr@gahr.no-ip.org) Received: from cpanel05.rubas-s05.net (cpanel05.rubas-s05.net [195.182.222.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3E98FC21 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 175-3.192-178.cust.bluewin.ch ([178.192.3.175] helo=gahr.no-ip.org) by cpanel05.rubas-s05.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SHd1a-0008Fy-S1; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:30:30 +0200 Received: by gahr.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 727ED4505F; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:30:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:30:28 +0200 From: Pietro Cerutti To: Mel Flynn Message-ID: <20120410153027.GE73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> References: <201204092351.q39Npi6F025202@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120410091537.GK98668@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20120410114537.GL17460@culot.org> <20120410115630.GB2456@lonesome.com> <20120410124449.GB73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20120410144741.GC73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <4F844F19.8070005@acsalaska.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ytoMbUMiTKPMT3hY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F844F19.8070005@acsalaska.net> X-PGP-Key: 0x9571F78E X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1203 92B5 3919 AF84 9B97 28D6 C0C2 6A98 9571 F78E User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cpanel05.rubas-s05.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - gahr.no-ip.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/8kingdoms Makefile ports/misc/airoflash Makefile ports/graphics/autopano-sift Makefile ports/x11/avant-window-navigator-xfce4 Makefile ports/lang/boo Makefile ports/x11/cl-clx-sbcl Makefile ports/palm/coldsync ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gahr@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:30:33 -0000 --ytoMbUMiTKPMT3hY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2012-Apr-10, 17:17, Mel Flynn wrote: > On 4/10/2012 16:47, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > On 2012-Apr-10, 11:20, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > >> 2012/4/10 Pietro Cerutti > >>> > >>> > >>> I might agree on that. But how is a DEPRECATED port better than a BRO= KEN > >>> one in this regard? > >>> > >>> > >> In my point of view, no make sense have a bunch of ports that actually > >> doesn't works or because there is a fetch problem or even it is set as > >> BROKEN. Who never was upset when need and find a port but it is BROKEN= for > >> some reason, In my view, have a port BROKEN or haven't it, is the same= =2E Of > >> course, I mean when a port is BROKEN for all plataforms as well as for= all > >> FreeBSD version. > >=20 > > I agree on that. > >=20 > >> > >> I believe set it as DEPRECATED is a good way to make the maintainer ta= ke > >> attention to fix it soon as possible, due he has put effort to insert = this > >> software on the ports tree in the past. > >=20 > > What about submitting a PR, as we usually do for anything else? If it's > > ok to wait 15 days (maintainer timeout) to commit an update to a port > > that brings in important features, it is even more so to wait to > > deprecate one. >=20 > Not to discredit your work in any way, but 6 months of being BROKEN can > be classified as maintainer timeout in the general case. That's your opinion, and while I agree on the general idea that six months is a lot, I would like actions / behavior to be based on policies previously agreed upon and documented. "15 days --> implicit approval (maintainer timeout)" is documented "6 months --> implicit deprecation of broken ports" is not > On a more constructive note - why don't you mention the specific port? > Maybe some of us on the list can help you figure out why some files > sometimes don't get byte compiled or provide you with a work-around > solution (dynamically generated plist comes to mind). The port is editors/komodo-edit. sbz@ gave me a hint about forcing byte-compilation of all the python classes using=20 post-install: @${PYTHON_CMD} -O -m compileall -q ${DATADIR} || true @${PYTHON_CMD} -m compileall -q ${DATADIR} || true but I never got to commit that. I'm testing it right now and unbreak the port very soon. Thank you! --=20 Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project gahr@FreeBSD.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp --ytoMbUMiTKPMT3hY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+EUhIACgkQwMJqmJVx945XoACaAhCrplQEtftkDNdP87l4Fs4w PRcAnjhvof9Mn5jsES4Lf0ofzBRW3rxS =99XN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ytoMbUMiTKPMT3hY-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 15:38:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA1C106566B; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:38:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from h-saeki@wmail.plala.or.jp) Received: from msa01b.plala.or.jp (msa01.plala.or.jp [IPv6:2400:7800:0:5010::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944498FC15; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from msc02.plala.or.jp ([172.23.12.32]) by msa01b.plala.or.jp with ESMTP id <20120410153806.YOEX8888.msa01b.plala.or.jp@msc02.plala.or.jp>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:38:06 +0900 Received: from freud.jp-media-lab.com.local ([121.115.132.154]) by msc02.plala.or.jp with ESMTP id <20120410153807.QWQJ14730.msc02.plala.or.jp@freud.jp-media-lab.com.local>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:38:07 +0900 Message-ID: <4F8453B1.8020809@wmail.plala.or.jp> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:37:21 +0900 From: Hiroshi Saeki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; ja-JP; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110622 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: chromium@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-VirusScan: Outbound; msa01b; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:38:06 +0900 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: chromium-18.0.1025.151 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:38:10 -0000 Hi, this mail is from Japan. I tried to portupgrade from 'chromium-17.0.963.79' to 'chromium-18.0.1025.151', only to fail. OS : FreeBSD/amd64 8.2-RELEASE-p6 hiroshi@freud~% uname -a FreeBSD freud.jp-media-lab.com.local 8.2-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p6 #8: Tue Jan 31 01:34:38 JST 2012 hiroshi@freud.jp-media-lab.com.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 Options for chromium 18.0.1025.151 is like that: CODECS Compile and enable patented codecs like H.264 X GCONF Use GConf2 for preferences X PULSEAUDIO Enable Pulse Audio support X CLANG Build Chromium with Clang GCC46 Build Chromium with GCC 4.6+ X DEBUG Compile with debug symbols and verbose output For compiler, gcc46 and clang show the same error. gcc46 : In file included from ./base/memory/weak_ptr.h:63:0, from ./media/audio/pulse/pulse_output.h:25, from media/audio/pulse/pulse_output.cc:5: ./base/logging.h: In function 'std::string* logging::CheckEQImpl(const t1&, const t2&, const char*) [with t1 = scoped_refptr, t2 = MessageLoop*, std::string = std::basi c_string]': media/audio/pulse/pulse_output.cc:129:3: instantiated from here ./base/logging.h:555:1: error: no match for 'operator==' in 'v1 == v2' ./base/logging.h:555:1: note: candidates are: ./base/logging.h:555:1: note: operator==(MessageLoop*, MessageLoop*) ./base/logging.h:555:1: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from 'const scoped_refptr' to 'MessageLoop*' ./base/logging.h:555:1: note: operator==(base::MessageLoopProxy*, base::MessageLoopProxy*) ./base/logging.h:555:1: note: no known conversion for argument 2 from 'MessageLoop* const' to 'base::MessageLoopProxy*' ./base/memory/scoped_ptr.h:224:6: note: template bool operator==(C*, const scoped_ptr&) ./base/memory/scoped_ptr.h:336:6: note: template bool operator==(C*, const scoped_array&) ./base/memory/scoped_ptr.h:462:6: note: template bool operator==(C*, const scoped_ptr_malloc&) ./base/logging.h:555:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] gmake: *** [out/Release/obj.target/media/media/audio/pulse/pulse_output.o] エラー 1 gmake: *** 未完了のジョブを待っています.... *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/chromium. *** Error code 1 clang : DEFINE_CHECK_OP_IMPL(EQ, ==) ^[[0;1;32m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ ^[[0m./base/logging.h:548:12: note: expanded from: if (v1 op v2) return NULL; \ ^[[0;1;32m ~~ ^ ~~ ^[[0m^[[1mmedia/audio/pulse/pulse_output.cc:129:3: ^[[0m^[[0;1;30mnote: ^[[0min instantiation of function template specialization 'logging::CheckEQImpl, M essageLoop *>' requested here^[[0m DCHECK_EQ(stream->manager_->GetMessageLoop(), MessageLoop::current()); ^[[0;1;32m ^ ^[[0m./base/logging.h:744:31: note: expanded from: #define DCHECK_EQ(val1, val2) DCHECK_OP(EQ, ==, val1, val2) ^[[0;1;32m ^ ^[[0m./base/logging.h:719:9: note: expanded from: logging::Check##name##Impl((val1), (val2), \ ^[[0;1;32m ^ ^[[0m^[[1m./base/memory/scoped_ptr.h:224:6: ^[[0m^[[0;1;30mnote: ^[[0mcandidate template ignored: failed template argument deduction^[[0m bool operator==(C* p1, const scoped_ptr& p2) { ^[[0;1;32m ^ ^[[0m^[[1m./base/memory/scoped_ptr.h:336:6: ^[[0m^[[0;1;30mnote: ^[[0mcandidate template ignored: failed template argument deduction^[[0m bool operator==(C* p1, const scoped_array& p2) { ^[[0;1;32m ^ ^[[0m^[[1m./base/memory/scoped_ptr.h:462:6: ^[[0m^[[0;1;30mnote: ^[[0mcandidate template ignored: failed template argument deduction^[[0m bool operator==(C* p, const scoped_ptr_malloc& b) { ^[[0;1;32m ^ ^[[0m1 error generated. gmake: *** [out/Release/obj.target/media/media/audio/pulse/pulse_output.o] エラー 1 gmake: *** 未完了のジョブを待っています.... *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/chromium. *** Error code 1 In my environment, pulseaudio is newest. pulseaudio-0.9.23 Sound server for UNIX Please fix. Yours sincerely, Hiroshi Saeki. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 15:48:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993BB106566B for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:48:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FD38FC08 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBFED2.dip.t-dialin.net [217.251.254.210]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q3AFmIPO049761; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:48:19 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3AFnnCv058304; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:49:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3AFnI1n013764; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:49:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201204101549.q3AFnI1n013764@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Mark Linimon From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:27:31 CDT." <20120409182731.GA31438@lonesome.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:49:18 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: Scot Hetzel , Boris Samorodov , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:48:22 -0000 Hi, Mark Linimon wrote: > On 9 April 2012 17:49, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > >> portmgr's policy is to honor removal requests, no matter the circumstances. > > ................................................ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > Irresponsible. Real 'Managers' shoulder responsibility. So ... > > Real managers get paid. > > Real managers get paid by companies. > > Real managers get paid by companies with legal departments who will > defend them from frivolous lawsuits, and pay them during the period > of time while the frivolous lawsuit works its way through the US court > system. > > I have given thousands of hours of free work to this project. I'm > damned sure not going to incur any legal liability on top of that, > even if due to someone wanting to take an unreasonable position. OK > Perhaps the legal system in Germany is less broken than the US. I > certainly hope so. I believe Britain (& maybe Germany) have a lower percentage of lawyers than USA. > But until you sit in my seat, and have been threatened with lawsuits > in the past for equally unreasonable situations, you simply don't > know what you're talking about. "Been there, Done that, Got the T shirt" ;-) I've been personaly legaly threatened even just managing a company's law suit against a Canadian debtor. Learnt: Their game: intimidation, their message: "Our lawyer is richer than your lawyer" I've sued (& won) for debt: Learnt: Even trivial law cases can take Years. I've helped head a club with events with risk to life, Learnt: Insurance! Have you enquired for FreeBSD if the Foundation could afford insurance for key named central staff ? It's something companies that donate might relate to, & if added to Foundation web, might attract extra donations. I've helped run a club that left volunteers in office too long till they felt the club owed them, some got fractious & some burnt out. Learnt: That's why boards of directors have compulsory resignation by rotation. (with option to stand for re-election) The name 'Manager' asserts both authority & responsibility. As portsmgr can't take decisions with risk of responsibility, ... Change portmgr@ to match reality, (port-adm@ maybe ?). Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 15:51:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EEE106566C for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:51:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4BC8FC0C for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [128.206.184.213] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3AFox6X021738; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:50:59 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Message-ID: <4F8456E3.2040908@missouri.edu> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:50:59 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mel Flynn References: <4F839499.8050103@missouri.edu> <4F83A164.8060107@acsalaska.net> In-Reply-To: <4F83A164.8060107@acsalaska.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: autodetecting dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:51:02 -0000 On 04/09/12 21:56, Mel Flynn wrote: > On 4/10/2012 04:02, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > >> 1. Don't worry about it. tinderbox builds will never build port A in >> the presence of package B. >> >> 2. Have the Makefile of port A detect whether package B is installed, >> and if it is then add B as a dependency of A. >> >> 3. Cripple the configure in port A so that it doesn't autodetect for >> package B. (Sometimes this can be done using a suitable CONFIGURE_ARGS, >> but not in my particular situation.) > > 4. Add OPTION PACKAGE_B. And cripple configure through EXTRA_PATCH if > set to off. > > Package B doesn't seem to offer any extra functionality to port A. I ended up going with option 3, because it turned out to be easier than I thought it would be. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 15:55:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55936106566B; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:55:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E418FC0A; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:55:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBFED2.dip.t-dialin.net [217.251.254.210]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q3AFtSlB049814; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:55:29 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3AFuxbB058342; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:56:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3AFulSx013821; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:56:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201204101556.q3AFulSx013821@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Doug Barton From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:30:52 PDT." <4F83631C.3080807@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:56:47 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: Da Rock , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:55:32 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > On 04/09/2012 15:21, Da Rock wrote: > > To stick my nose where it probably doesn't belong: indeed. This is one > > area where linux annoys the most for that very reason. > > > > Let the user decide and bear the responsibility. > > If you want to put up a server with all the encumbered software and let > people download it, go right ahead. Meanwhile, the project has chosen > (wisely) not to run the risk of legal entanglements. > > .. not to mention the common courtesy of following the wishes of those > who created the software in the first place. Also not to mention the uncommon dis-courtesy of someone publishing code free to the world, gaining users, then retracting code [to go commercial]. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 16:11:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58FC8106566B for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:11:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (m209-73.dsl.rawbw.com [198.144.209.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA548FC08 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:11:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3AGBue8008695 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:11:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q3AGBufY008694 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:11:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:11:56 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120410161156.GE1606@albert.catwhisker.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2qXFWqzzG3v1+95a" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: upgrade sqlite3-3.7.10 -> sqlite3-3.7.11 appears to break svnversion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:11:57 -0000 --2qXFWqzzG3v1+95a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I updated my stable/8 slice before upgrading the installed ports on my laptop, so when I ran portmaster, it was running: FreeBSD g1-227.catwhisker.org 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #360 23= 4093M: Tue Apr 10 04:22:16 PDT 2012 root@g1-227.catwhisker.org:/common/= S1/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY i386 There were no whines from portmaster that I can see. (I did the upgrade within script, and can provide the typescript to interested folks.) But now, if I run "svnversion," I see: d134(8.3-P)[33] /usr/local/bin/svnversion /usr/src/ svn: E200030: sqlite: callback requested query abort svn: E200030: sqlite: callback requested query abort d134(8.3-P)[34]=20 svn appears to generally be working, otherwise. Should I rebuild the subversion port? Is there an ABI change that may require a corresponding change in subversion? The phase of the moon jsut the wrong color? Thanks! Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --2qXFWqzzG3v1+95a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+EW8sACgkQmprOCmdXAD1gowCfYVUllOmerOBYUuS+tspZwp+R bLsAoIL2RdhhHuEFgJ0Cpzt0HhyM1AeH =iy1j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2qXFWqzzG3v1+95a-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 16:22:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D778106564A for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:22:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E55D8FC16 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:22:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CA97E849; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:22:46 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4F845E40.5010207@acsalaska.net> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:22:24 +0200 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Wolfskill References: <20120410161156.GE1606@albert.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <20120410161156.GE1606@albert.catwhisker.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrade sqlite3-3.7.10 -> sqlite3-3.7.11 appears to break svnversion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:22:48 -0000 On 4/10/2012 18:11, David Wolfskill wrote: > svn: E200030: sqlite: callback requested query abort Does svn cleanup in /usr/src fix the issue? -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 16:26:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF50106566B for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:26:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (m209-73.dsl.rawbw.com [198.144.209.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33CD98FC0C for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3AGQ64m008741; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:26:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q3AGQ6rt008740; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:26:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:26:06 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: Mel Flynn Message-ID: <20120410162606.GF1606@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20120410161156.GE1606@albert.catwhisker.org> <4F845E40.5010207@acsalaska.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5CUMAwwhRxlRszMD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F845E40.5010207@acsalaska.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrade sqlite3-3.7.10 -> sqlite3-3.7.11 appears to break svnversion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:26:08 -0000 --5CUMAwwhRxlRszMD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 06:22:24PM +0200, Mel Flynn wrote: > On 4/10/2012 18:11, David Wolfskill wrote: > > svn: E200030: sqlite: callback requested query abort >=20 > Does svn cleanup in /usr/src fix the issue? > ... Huh -- it seems to do precisely that -- thanks! Is this something that should be done ... often? Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --5CUMAwwhRxlRszMD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+EXx0ACgkQmprOCmdXAD0lfACeJA3rtPx9dOMt8+4mkmHEVd+k ZY0AoIcnRFpM9b3RxzPRz2JQ5fha4hWd =mDiP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5CUMAwwhRxlRszMD-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 16:33:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2E310658FE for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:33:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3548FC18 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0087E849; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:33:48 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4F8460D5.1040607@acsalaska.net> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:33:25 +0200 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Wolfskill References: <20120410161156.GE1606@albert.catwhisker.org> <4F845E40.5010207@acsalaska.net> <20120410162606.GF1606@albert.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <20120410162606.GF1606@albert.catwhisker.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrade sqlite3-3.7.10 -> sqlite3-3.7.11 appears to break svnversion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:33:50 -0000 On 4/10/2012 18:26, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 06:22:24PM +0200, Mel Flynn wrote: >> On 4/10/2012 18:11, David Wolfskill wrote: >>> svn: E200030: sqlite: callback requested query abort >> >> Does svn cleanup in /usr/src fix the issue? >> ... > > Huh -- it seems to do precisely that -- thanks! > > Is this something that should be done ... often? I suspect this is something that svn upgrade should have taken care of as I've only seen the issue with working directories checked out with pre-1.7 subversion and subsequently upgraded to the new format. But I don't have enough data points or insight into subversion code to make that definitive. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 17:03:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FC91065673; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:03:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395558FC16; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3AH3jNW068443; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:03:45 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q3AH3iTO068441; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:03:44 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@freebsd.org using -f Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:03:40 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Pietro Cerutti Message-ID: <20120410170340.GA61339@azathoth.lan> References: <201204092351.q39Npi6F025202@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120410091537.GK98668@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20120410114537.GL17460@culot.org> <20120410115630.GB2456@lonesome.com> <20120410124449.GB73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20120410144741.GC73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120410144741.GC73185@gahrfit.gahr.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: araujo@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, Frederic Culot , cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/8kingdoms Makefile ports/misc/airoflash Makefile ports/graphics/autopano-sift Makefile ports/x11/avant-window-navigator-xfce4 Makefile ports/lang/boo Makefile ports/x11/cl-clx-sbcl Makefile ports/palm/coldsync ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:03:45 -0000 --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 04:47:41PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 2012-Apr-10, 11:20, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > > 2012/4/10 Pietro Cerutti > > > > > > > > > I might agree on that. But how is a DEPRECATED port better than a BRO= KEN > > > one in this regard? > > > > > > > > In my point of view, no make sense have a bunch of ports that actually > > doesn't works or because there is a fetch problem or even it is set as > > BROKEN. Who never was upset when need and find a port but it is BROKEN = for > > some reason, In my view, have a port BROKEN or haven't it, is the same.= Of > > course, I mean when a port is BROKEN for all plataforms as well as for = all > > FreeBSD version. >=20 > I agree on that. >=20 > >=20 > > I believe set it as DEPRECATED is a good way to make the maintainer take > > attention to fix it soon as possible, due he has put effort to insert t= his > > software on the ports tree in the past. >=20 > What about submitting a PR, as we usually do for anything else? If it's > ok to wait 15 days (maintainer timeout) to commit an update to a port > that brings in important features, it is even more so to wait to > deprecate one. >=20 That is a good option, next time I'll do that for maintained ports that are= mark as BROKEN. I didn't intend to be disrespectful on other's work, I'm sorry if that is t= he fealing some could get, next time, I'll be more careful about this and send= the deprecation stuff as PR. regards, Bapt --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+EZ+wACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExJagCeM8Tb+qJDtd6RC1l7BxyDMT1a 6BgAoLpWTZNc5M8YwUdkSuZ1RWVLxvHp =/dga -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 18:11:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BF4106566C for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:11:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nanoman@nanoman.ca) Received: from mail.nanoman.ca (mail.nanoman.ca [76.10.173.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71AAD8FC08 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nanocomputer.nanoman.ca (nanocomputer.nanoman.ca [192.168.1.9]) by mail.nanoman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD7A115FB; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:04:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nanocomputer.nanoman.ca (Postfix, from userid 62661) id 19DC817258; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:04:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:04:05 -0400 From: "A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman)" To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith Message-ID: <20120410180405.GD19377@nanocomputer.nanoman.ca> References: <4F839499.8050103@missouri.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="Hf61M2y+wYpnELGG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F839499.8050103@missouri.edu> Organization: Nanoman's Company User-Agent: Mutt (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: autodetecting dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nanoman@nanoman.ca List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:11:36 -0000 --Hf61M2y+wYpnELGG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >So suppose we are building port A. It turns out that the configure in >port A autodetects whether package B is present or not. It will build >either way. But if built with package B, it will not operate without it. > >So suppose I build port A on machine X which has package B installed. >Then I create a package from A, and copy the package to machine Y. >Machine Y does not have package B installed, and so when package A is >installed, it doesn't work on machine Y. > >What are the accepted ways of handling this? > >1. Don't worry about it. tinderbox builds will never build port A in >the presence of package B. > >2. Have the Makefile of port A detect whether package B is installed, >and if it is then add B as a dependency of A. > >3. Cripple the configure in port A so that it doesn't autodetect for >package B. (Sometimes this can be done using a suitable CONFIGURE_ARGS, >but not in my particular situation.) > >I prefer the answer (1). But I am interested in other people's >opinions. One problem with (2) or (3) is that the creator of the port >might never find out which packages could be autodetected by port A's >configure without performing an exhaustive search of the source code of A. > >Thanks, Stephen In my opinion, it's best to use the OPTIONS framework and to avoid automati= c detection entirely. Consider this problem: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120304190922.GA58789 For your example, I would add this line to port A's Makefile: OPTIONS=3D PORT_B "Enable Port B" off I would then replace the automatic detection part of port A's Makefile with= something like this: =2Eif defined(WITH_PORT_B) && !defined(WITHOUT_PORT_B) RUN_DEPENDS+=3D portb-1.0:${PORTSDIR}/category/portb =2Eendif So, if you don't want port A built with package B as a dependency, you'd us= e the default on port A's OPTIONS "dialog" screen, otherwise, you'd put a c= heck beside "PORT_B". --=20 A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign Nanoman's Company | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail E-mail: nanoman@nanoman.ca | X - No proprietary attachments WWW: http://www.nanoman.ca/ | / \ - Respect for open standards --Hf61M2y+wYpnELGG Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIIPCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIIO/DCCDvgCAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCC DHcwggUyMIIDGqADAgECAgMLj20wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAweTEQMA4GA1UEChMHUm9vdCBD QTEeMBwGA1UECxMVaHR0cDovL3d3dy5jYWNlcnQub3JnMSIwIAYDVQQDExlDQSBDZXJ0IFNp Z25pbmcgQXV0aG9yaXR5MSEwHwYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhJzdXBwb3J0QGNhY2VydC5vcmcwHhcN MTIwNDAzMTkwNjMwWhcNMTIwOTMwMTkwNjMwWjA9MRgwFgYDVQQDEw9DQWNlcnQgV29UIFVz ZXIxITAfBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWEm5hbm9tYW5AbmFub21hbi5jYTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEB BQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAK9WRGqRDUDjWwNIfZTBp4FL5bI0kY3ZqvM6tEO+Sqp5YxATre8F a+BYbeNp/8MKfuPrRgE2jRzlePAx7kpvZUhRTGAZpncmHC7Z3FDl8Ugid4193ReCfPypb9Gs 3ZgPfzJyNuDeCM3amz/cDXC/makJLpmLzu95D91hD+V30iActE5j1tNewMq9qJRoEdr5Tqus bUjjDm8kiK5sz9JzQjFoufuaWIR57w2Sm1gDVZ0MH46fxZ/SwLDDzt4VC2u+1oS4KSmVUm6X Wv1/Fmdf2sOOu9Ro2xVjJHW+j16lsFPPj+lkDv5tb0G7I2vBoKEQg/s+h8J4F+l/xPL3O5xB c68CAwEAAaOB/jCB+zAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMFYGCWCGSAGG+EIBDQRJFkdUbyBnZXQgeW91 ciBvd24gY2VydGlmaWNhdGUgZm9yIEZSRUUgaGVhZCBvdmVyIHRvIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuQ0Fj ZXJ0Lm9yZzBABgNVHSUEOTA3BggrBgEFBQcDBAYIKwYBBQUHAwIGCisGAQQBgjcKAwQGCisG AQQBgjcKAwMGCWCGSAGG+EIEATAyBggrBgEFBQcBAQQmMCQwIgYIKwYBBQUHMAGGFmh0dHA6 Ly9vY3NwLmNhY2VydC5vcmcwHQYDVR0RBBYwFIESbmFub21hbkBuYW5vbWFuLmNhMA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBBQUAA4ICAQAQUEMT2uupQXvmCVOcJWoZOZR6WielH7H4ewoCjQxCqEkqtrn4P4GV DyV9v9suQ1uLu6uZFZAlmkDa0hKdpaz01rgLARMwR9XGBBnRuq17HoNkt9kBFWWCjwegfw5M kXdCkXu/cQ0TVA1guhJz6tJ/LHg8deUGu5FGbw/+Om6haUX1udId3XtaqdONEOpqv2SPsVvg qeu5SyxJVJJvAXp9iA1W6yk3JAatO4X9LjntzNsFcFkVGGssbsqQdnp6rPCXD3MqYI7TSSn9 nUvHe9lxcxAbeP/6jU033NSFqSIjrcliB1VLeElbCE1vhZF1bAUMzxR4Fpa670O3Q9bycnDI SUjzJVKYEg2AtD2GVrN9NjE9+N+xvJ4ixweumoFy3Ojp85OcAP5gb7oLYDJaHERwrz6psyQa LWrCEqY+lwZVq/Mw+gOQkFhq/zu+hK4xYw5NpexYB+Qf/OKi2/CGNKj8xi+8XMTdNBzW1JOy 8b8XYoTCb0BBuyBWpgibnm6E2EMuDWFtTX9V1hx7NG1nC5qsc1aLGdaXm1W48TL1cOqOMwuf 6RO/AZKdCikqoswCz7Fl1kRIeAjN1jv5EIR60hxfWrcOFzA44Er7oQ23S+t2Xl77QenuTa5B RJOEBfs34ll8vanK3ltorR5rwAYyjYIkrknaxf1+JFeR9/cAcbWy1jCCBz0wggUloAMCAQIC AQAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAweTEQMA4GA1UEChMHUm9vdCBDQTEeMBwGA1UECxMVaHR0cDov L3d3dy5jYWNlcnQub3JnMSIwIAYDVQQDExlDQSBDZXJ0IFNpZ25pbmcgQXV0aG9yaXR5MSEw HwYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhJzdXBwb3J0QGNhY2VydC5vcmcwHhcNMDMwMzMwMTIyOTQ5WhcNMzMw MzI5MTIyOTQ5WjB5MRAwDgYDVQQKEwdSb290IENBMR4wHAYDVQQLExVodHRwOi8vd3d3LmNh Y2VydC5vcmcxIjAgBgNVBAMTGUNBIENlcnQgU2lnbmluZyBBdXRob3JpdHkxITAfBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWEnN1cHBvcnRAY2FjZXJ0Lm9yZzCCAiIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggIPADCCAgoC ggIBAM4iwOJGfew2KAdQlvKgM0CMS/E7Zj8x5WsCNtvWfPbxiI9OdzYFQZX5CfASz0aGc2C3 bn7owFhkrs2wrUUXDGP6Zwro1tK/PueYxPBM+uADuzVdbCHeniDZus1mMjdy+vcI9cfNWMmO 5w5e6j7+HKEUChVshoRbZGYqeqlLU3n1iKJ77i8KYSuNsn5NVqUT7Orakp6sREEeWGBlBWb4 wES9y5T3Qn4L92VomFEF8PMFkQQdGxeC7MhXu8NreojxsHLMJVsgkewWAhKPMukXGEjQxwUu AjBCuCWcBWs/qjqn61NI9+jStgeY3BvGNH9/yRyCegVYKwhb8ziiqxddZsmY154Qi6LS3XSa 93EMcmDfzW+YM52WNHY+JHqSsA6VHm/moEU4R6rXQe1KtxL21xuDig8u2Am2WdeqBP/Sk31o Lt2LS6tYui+N6pWnoMNUiaX724tRIp2yw74RviyRhouWeK0g04ovGj/G0FFlhyGxGQFlf0Uc h/V80EFMTymYIf0zH3UMBFH6GXfb1BQc7oHDHfWYt2kGkSLdAFDMgTGsEgd7ONpoW+Yr1H7J X63o63JM8wHlSyC/mqZXypEAAYuhdSE3tWMNZz5GT3AgZ87F1lnbAuDw0svNumK3kEHo3SDk KbxkKULIItx4mv9D7JgbCVFLWlrCcfHEy3Op5aELAgMBAAGjggHOMIIByjAdBgNVHQ4EFgQU FrUyG9TH8+DmjvO90rA67rI5GNEwgaMGA1UdIwSBmzCBmIAUFrUyG9TH8+DmjvO90rA67rI5 GNGhfaR7MHkxEDAOBgNVBAoTB1Jvb3QgQ0ExHjAcBgNVBAsTFWh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY2FjZXJ0 Lm9yZzEiMCAGA1UEAxMZQ0EgQ2VydCBTaWduaW5nIEF1dGhvcml0eTEhMB8GCSqGSIb3DQEJ ARYSc3VwcG9ydEBjYWNlcnQub3JnggEAMA8GA1UdEwEB/wQFMAMBAf8wMgYDVR0fBCswKTAn oCWgI4YhaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuY2FjZXJ0Lm9yZy9yZXZva2UuY3JsMDAGCWCGSAGG+EIBBAQj FiFodHRwczovL3d3dy5jYWNlcnQub3JnL3Jldm9rZS5jcmwwNAYJYIZIAYb4QgEIBCcWJWh0 dHA6Ly93d3cuY2FjZXJ0Lm9yZy9pbmRleC5waHA/aWQ9MTAwVgYJYIZIAYb4QgENBEkWR1Rv IGdldCB5b3VyIG93biBjZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBmb3IgRlJFRSBoZWFkIG92ZXIgdG8gaHR0cDov L3d3dy5jYWNlcnQub3JnMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4ICAQAox+6cggK6XIASyjUKHYFviWqZ zPJoD3+n4Y1YlT698gbDkFqstWD2mUMBo4hwnJ1inaSHr2dYDTA2O+atSNPLdAKGcT7iKwNo 8TRiQEY7U+oo9Kz7ZpVTik1d/TvZYNfKeWk7sWWSpsaBglyczetNAYql3xFVqhXKHzfAgphw YdtqfJajji5UPk8hqZDv3IK/3OhFrU2Qcwg8lGWwBJl2f+K8wmoVqpcENyTYHpRObQ5RvtbE j8qWbfdD3+gwZSc7e7tDQ2PEQ/ey7GjM4RmOIvuY4XtaPgE3O4sIsKLzlU4ay5vNmrHbsnDw LUrb2LDjb0VIMxL//jwyKlT3xPeK8Igjwkf+ZHpxwNEepmOwB36kL9MBj9yfK7bGCKkPk0gl /BL9n0Lc88Q+9lew191p0QZ3NApL0sqg/xzGjMkWvsTMMjdoc18I+1H3SVM2BQqVAkzyeRoQ 9tg6dZzzHfGiDXBnhhuzFvUv5aTreYb5PQvCcwulmaxv/Ge45S8LphgkjXvRSDUpGECsk2Dh loZQtHpZ2I8hC5/PgpHGO79r3AeRuZdWI6q2bJTGSAY85M5OquT2LwncU28u/HTrOmOZwqas ibynskSgDYoQ42zyJMv6m59wRy7eFIvUsiAJlqJk8SQc3KE1nBWy1LxVLn0G9ZwOVfRa1pPa dq0lc0zFQzGCAlwwggJYAgEBMIGAMHkxEDAOBgNVBAoTB1Jvb3QgQ0ExHjAcBgNVBAsTFWh0 dHA6Ly93d3cuY2FjZXJ0Lm9yZzEiMCAGA1UEAxMZQ0EgQ2VydCBTaWduaW5nIEF1dGhvcml0 eTEhMB8GCSqGSIb3DQEJARYSc3VwcG9ydEBjYWNlcnQub3JnAgMLj20wCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCB sTAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0xMjA0MTAxODA0 MDVaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBRXFfDw+hm25enqExK/V37swSizgjBSBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8x RTBDMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMC BzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCAQBSgfBIXvCloLCsH8LpM9TU5Ir+ gchiPuwD2wtcuS1FuFVkRhn2DUj3SJ2iG8ZTxJeut2sc4ONL+Fukb73CfmhROcKtrC74MwZv qFp/y2tOq3gqT95X8tjYB9vn/fDnwgwLO9BWGPOnEiJl+3Co7W05aobLJdB02yH8rbOOOZuW Vdrp/UfC8GwUwPZgMZMKeJDgrrQas0MkBdE59H1UDJIhT8MlDW8KwBxQAazVBLrndQbHGWz/ J3zJuJvDfLhpv0sgsohMUl6pWywFRwE+ABUuFjfyR8PWUaRHRQ5DafVGaCf7XKqNYpPgrmdh RKoQdBSV065UpYDomzwo580ylshL --Hf61M2y+wYpnELGG-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 18:38:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E91106566B for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:38:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pinnacle@korax.net) Received: from vsd10.korax.net (vsd10.korax.net [216.201.101.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1658FC08 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:38:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vsd10.korax.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 31DCE114FD; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:29:09 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: andrewjones231@gmail.com Message-Id: <20120410182909.31DCE114FD@vsd10.korax.net> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:29:09 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: I found this great article on Jobhawk.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: andrewjones231@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:38:16 -0000 Hi freebsd-ports@freebsd.org I found the article How To Save On Electricity Bills http://payspree.com/6702/jhakz I thought may interest you. You can find it at [1]http://www.jobhawk.com/blank.php http://payspree.com/6702/jhakz References 1. http://www.jobhawk.com/blank.php From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 19:05:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0DE6106566C; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:05:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F438FC0C; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so141715vbm.13 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:05:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=aeBhY2Zi/mGnoPevFzgk1CtDOLiqTAdnkJT8sTXiUIE=; b=F6kQGKHoPcl3b9D0tX0lSw9Vu8eC103OcHRIxI6DlMOEvmnEvPlU27wdJgZ0roac0m pR2JIWmireGaY8iP0UuKufDybuaa13dF4vT7v3NuMaqIyIxLel0xwKI/xHPMARaM9QTW Tyg6LCuhRpCGuYWjmeksOAUwk1xnx9pFS3hZ7FTmd1LfhU6BUDEQWGBC3yrbPLcMU8YM c8ofhHEIi7l9T9LQED2Og1dT7ID/s4mKkSDO+/65gz39StUuYSQOKBdhs0QI7uHY5LfH 0ot522eI6sYgTslg6HrRxQT8CJNqgPL8wlAkzpDjhIrRHA2+PF+20pRF+TLBKyzDk2ZJ 5b+Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.24.170 with SMTP id v10mr5148439vdf.74.1334084733362; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:05:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.28.98 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:05:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:05:33 +0200 Message-ID: From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: demon@freebsd.org, thorsten.greiner@web.de Subject: Memory leak in xfce4-netload-plugin and xfce4-systemload-plugin - only on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:05:40 -0000 I see a memory leak (or something like that) in the ports sysutils/xfce4-netload-plugin sysutils/xfce4-systemload-plugin The ports start out using less than 100M of memory (taken from the SIZE column in top), but over a short time (about a week or two) grows to almost 1000M. An example is my workstation, which has been up for about three days now: tingo@kg-v2$ uname -a FreeBSD kg-v2.kg4.no 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #5: Fri Apr 6 21:35:20 CEST 2012 root@kg-v2.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 tingo@kg-v2$ uptime 8:49PM up 3 days, 22:19, 20 users, load averages: 0.12, 0.21, 0.23 xfce4-netload-plugin is now at 670M and xfce4-systemload-plugin is at 509M Ports on the machine are updated: root@kg-v2# pv | grep netload xfce4-netload-plugin-1.1.0 = up-to-date with port root@kg-v2# pv | grep systemload xfce4-systemload-plugin-1.0.0_2 = up-to-date with port Does anyone else see this? I reported it originally in the Forums[1] , but didn't get any response. And how can I diagnose the problem further, so that I can provide a better error report References: 1) http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=28698 -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 19:36:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0F31065672; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:36:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward20.mail.yandex.net (forward20.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1402::5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE678FC1D; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:36:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp18.mail.yandex.net (smtp18.mail.yandex.net [95.108.252.18]) by forward20.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 1DA0010402F4; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:36:23 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1334086583; bh=CteftB7zeTtCE0bvw8H72viA98bZTsv7ItRp06ZuR3E=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=SNIPoSq9Hp2dOWfLkcvBbh1PKXlgMoAIw87nyvBCwpzn4Txk+sIU+V4CIjqtrXjks 7bJ+os7SkKWUakJ2RArYCN+0NrLj41OCN7+AqqXUpvgDMpQFdVwij8mYxD2FOsjzlW LjQ8RzSB4ZVKz6hLLB5iSx3dBRuEhdiT7JKyRinM= Received: from smtp18.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp18.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id F172018A0194; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:36:22 +0400 (MSK) Received: from unknown (unknown [178.76.224.133]) by smtp18.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id aMNeIO3b-aMNSTnFT; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:36:22 +0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1334086582; bh=CteftB7zeTtCE0bvw8H72viA98bZTsv7ItRp06ZuR3E=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=daWXCQdFKYOTiCkKuoA6kxKE/8ssP8//ey8AkhnlXZTXHwQW/m+QIWbcfCERbG2T7 CWanzBpfJ6OKVM5bfTHr+k9LYCEpAJEvtmS9L4Ccw5UA/OKzwWpl6geNMiGybbFguV gfNZFP9v9tmtCn1PLvbZtl6WDxb5fykTtbxdkKdc= Message-ID: <4F848B92.8000504@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:35:46 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Timur I. Bakeyev" References: <4F7E498E.7070007@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F804679.2040803@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F80D4F9.9020207@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4F80D4F9.9020207@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba34-3.4.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:36:25 -0000 Completely offtopic, but we have a nice unauthenticated remote root here: http://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2012-1182 -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 19:56:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53CD31065670 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:56:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB498FC0A for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHhAO-0004lW-3a for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:56:02 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHhAD-0001Mw-TH for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:55:41 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3AJtfaa062088 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:55:41 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q3AJtf35062087 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:55:41 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bris.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:55:41 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120410195541.GA62066@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: pkg version -Xs foo shows all ports, not just foo X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:56:11 -0000 BUZI> pkg version -Xs Image CalculiX-2.4 = GraphicsMagick-1.1.15_3,1 = ImageMagick-6.7.5.10 = ORBit2-2.14.19 = OpenEXR-1.6.1_3 = R-2.14.2 = ^C BUZI> The man page seems to indicate that the above options should only show ImageMagick. What am I doing wrong? Thanks -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 20:24:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E8E106566B for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5398FC18 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:24:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds12 with SMTP id ds12so189910wgb.31 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:24:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Jq+ICyFK5IPIYyFJWUmpQyQLzjbhNlCPHNLgfdyjtYE=; b=V5uJSC2rO6wS8NYiiS65aUZSS/M4LwJPk4B5oMg3ALjCF0GOrTPhfy3k1JFurjJY7+ 8TCue4c2Jtb1EgN3NZ3TXSVnEdUDKw0HzxMLmsGqxRPfQj4xa3e3hBUEJT9kzMGajGs+ znjS4hjBTHNWuhkNmFi5c/9swGxxVTbUjrmiI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=Jq+ICyFK5IPIYyFJWUmpQyQLzjbhNlCPHNLgfdyjtYE=; b=JUZyF6tW/7OfnMKp7Jqj+qCBqAm6e3M68wPMYPd4EoM00HsLaWJUdibEI4kzQcHpiT /9BW4yxsx49VGQAZnoqUEF/POiuC41nSOtLxifxyPdE2bMNzkgk4TAifWwjMtu0cApO+ iIGWIFC+Qo42dq1046EerYYhT8HYH+JSYytHrMAmP0e+cRS3vls6DJeF7zlrfy4z7sOq 8oAxJ+/imi6X/hxjrX+Xlv5UmFD+IhJAVLMKdDb++eYDRXWO3xlWV8i6u0Fkm8TEpN9q KMuNAxu8yts992imyST+SoyZI93ReKISB2ziLFlK/a2xZe8Us9ewFJmKNPTB2V81BIO3 fLyg== Received: by 10.180.91.165 with SMTP id cf5mr10136359wib.2.1334089463918; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:24:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.63.4 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:23:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F839499.8050103@missouri.edu> References: <4F839499.8050103@missouri.edu> From: Eitan Adler Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:23:53 -0400 Message-ID: To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnEKPYa2RMAUx7yFiMBsuJulf/6Xl48+7DbYnVmt8lLtmmYBobwJOnfTonSqdu52z6A4tCK Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: autodetecting dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:24:25 -0000 On 9 April 2012 22:02, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrot= e: > So suppose we are building port A. =C2=A0It turns out that the configure = in port > A autodetects whether package B is present or not. =C2=A0It will build ei= ther > way. =C2=A0But if built with package B, it will not operate without it. > > So suppose I build port A on machine X which has package B installed. The= n I > create a package from A, and copy the package to machine Y. Machine Y doe= s > not have package B installed, and so when package A is installed, it does= n't > work on machine Y. > > What are the accepted ways of handling this? > > 1. =C2=A0Don't worry about it. =C2=A0tinderbox builds will never build po= rt A in the > presence of package B. > > 2. =C2=A0Have the Makefile of port A detect whether package B is installe= d, and > if it is then add B as a dependency of A. > > 3. =C2=A0Cripple the configure in port A so that it doesn't autodetect fo= r > package B. =C2=A0(Sometimes this can be done using a suitable CONFIGURE_A= RGS, but > not in my particular situation.) The current answer for "automagical dependencies" is to fix (not cripple) the configure option to not autodetect for package B. Any port which currently has automatic detection is buggy and should be fixed. You can use the OPTIONS framework to enable or disable the option. --=20 Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 21:01:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FCC106564A for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331938FC0A for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so248083vbm.13 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:01:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ImteuuR8NqgPfgotH5I1hPuhWpvVzkUYRsVjgiYxfGk=; b=nc4pS8zDWEIleUmjL44ZiUCoH8jkZPiCcatMtNFeA7N7HnYFQ8zXVMkPlCo/pwcuw5 s0D6ENYI9xZLUNM1PgXI9FaOak9lOVpdoO7vK6XkZ5psB3tAWOAptXC7YZl0rw9LiBjg cY22vtHCMNrPC+MFBw+5l3DbNQZ6EvI97xfqEOghMhFZiACqpbm0S3EH5FSctJ+pD6Xx HNSyS9eFAzqmI+Kz/3Aw2ZkLF/9d5b+AJ4n+d+FE53uMZ/GWqhT0pmGp5Zc8gG1tZs+T 02O/byV6PKW4Rv2WN6jKpTsxHGCYtKgWElBoQyu3gtBqMhMPmACyL2VPv90luGgXYkPJ MB1g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.154.2 with SMTP id m2mr6484963vcw.55.1334091708203; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:01:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.28.98 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:01:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:01:48 +0200 Message-ID: From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Memory leak in xfce4-netload-plugin and xfce4-systemload-plugin - only on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:01:49 -0000 Reason for resending: It doesn't look like the ports@ address works. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Torfinn Ingolfsen Date: Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:05 PM Subject: Memory leak in xfce4-netload-plugin and xfce4-systemload-plugin - only on FreeBSD? To: FreeBSD Ports Cc: demon@freebsd.org, thorsten.greiner@web.de I see a memory leak (or something like that) in the ports sysutils/xfce4-netload-plugin sysutils/xfce4-systemload-plugin The ports start out using less than 100M of memory (taken from the SIZE column in top), but over a short time (about a week or two) grows to almost 1000M. An example is my workstation, which has been up for =A0about three days now= : tingo@kg-v2$ uname -a FreeBSD kg-v2.kg4.no 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #5: Fri Apr =A06 21:35:20 CEST 2012 root@kg-v2.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC =A0amd64 tingo@kg-v2$ uptime =A08:49PM =A0up 3 days, 22:19, 20 users, load averages: 0.12, 0.21, 0.23 xfce4-netload-plugin is now at 670M and xfce4-systemload-plugin is at 509M Ports on the machine are updated: root@kg-v2# pv | grep netload xfce4-netload-plugin-1.1.0 =A0=3D =A0up-to-date with port root@kg-v2# pv | grep systemload xfce4-systemload-plugin-1.0.0_2 =A0=3D =A0up-to-date with port Does anyone else see this? I reported it originally in the Forums[1] , but didn't get any response. And how can I diagnose the problem further, so that I can provide a better error report References: 1) http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3D28698 -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 21:09:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925BA106564A for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:09:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from portland1.byshenk.net (portland1.byshenk.net [69.168.54.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428138FC08 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:09:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portland1.byshenk.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by portland1.byshenk.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3AKlbfo001831; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:47:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from byshenknet@portland1.byshenk.net) Received: (from byshenknet@localhost) by portland1.byshenk.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q3AKlbde001830; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:47:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from byshenknet) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:47:37 -0700 From: Greg Byshenk To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20120410204737.GA1737@portland1.byshenk.net> References: <20120410195541.GA62066@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120410195541.GA62066@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on portland1.byshenk.net Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg version -Xs foo shows all ports, not just foo X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:09:33 -0000 On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:55:41PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > BUZI> pkg version -Xs Image > CalculiX-2.4 = > GraphicsMagick-1.1.15_3,1 = > ImageMagick-6.7.5.10 = > ORBit2-2.14.19 = > OpenEXR-1.6.1_3 = > R-2.14.2 = > ^C > BUZI> > > The man page seems to indicate that the > above options should only show ImageMagick. > > What am I doing wrong? I'm not sure if it's a bug or a feature, but pkg_version seems to want the arguments separately. $ pkg_version -X -s Image ImageMagick = $ Although in this particular case, 'pkg_version -s Image' (without the '-X') seems to do just fine, as well. -- greg byshenk - gbyshenk@byshenk.net - Leiden, NL - Portland, OR USA From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 11 01:51:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16EAB106566B for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 01:51:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maho.nakata@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63C58FC0A for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 01:51:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbcwz17 with SMTP id wz17so684091pbc.13 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:51:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:message-id:to:cc:subject:from:x-mailer:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1kV9lDHf/GIg2ZKD9vv7vsJqO7jdxpacOeyIMm6AJxg=; b=M79vTDF21QN9AR1amwo9wR3ZbFNVsksPGy2SeCEts1izz/f0QrkEjHRIEGbabnkPha 8Rn9hQP2nM7nQws/iO3/zDDx7LDgdEpq/Jf5LJobxDsaiYtmXoyXi0EdqyHLnO4chrFr 2OStvsL7KDjgpjcRLQeYtQjBHjY3j/8SbDWWWt5ZieZTlLG3XOsnr1U11DVbvY9vdnEd vPiI7//Z3Mv6UotcKYQQdVeaifsL5PDzyW2qRN6JZmOobtOYAkpSEAokmLwKkEUKCXN+ Yp8AigYc9p0EPz16AYEZnWIDP1thfQSvOB5zf0ezfYCQANiIDGFs/tk0BFi3Oc7eajCD chHA== Received: by 10.68.220.65 with SMTP id pu1mr34558595pbc.32.1334109115494; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:51:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (rikad42.riken.jp. [134.160.214.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b4sm1431951pbc.7.2012.04.10.18.51.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:51:54 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Maho NAKATA Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:51:51 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20120411.105151.2170094387724287111.maho@FreeBSD.org> To: stephen@missouri.edu From: Maho NAKATA X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.4 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) In-Reply-To: <20120409222652.GK66606@droso.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="--Next_Part(Wed_Apr_11_10_51_51_2012_794)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: octave port will be updated to 3.6.1 and all the octave-forge ports will be updated accordingly. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 01:51:56 -0000 ----Next_Part(Wed_Apr_11_10_51_51_2012_794)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Stephen, and ports@ I would like to ask you the final check of our patch against octave and octave-forge-* port. I also e-mail to port@ since it is a sweeping commit. Now ports tree has been unfrozen. Octave 3.6.1 is out and I would like to update with attached patch. Since this is an API change to octave, it seemed appropriate to me to bump the portrevision of every single octave-forge port. But a few of the ports needed further patches to make them work: ad, communications, parallel, odepkg. es package doesn't build so we switched off. Sorry, we are not sure all octave-forge-* ports will run without problems. Thanks Nakata Maho From: Erwin Lansing Subject: [HEADSUP]: Ports tree unfrozen Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:26:53 +0200 > With the final builds starting for 8.3-RELEASE, the feature freeze has > been lifted. > > Erwin > > -- > Erwin Lansing http://droso.org > Prediction is very difficult > especially about the future erwin@FreeBSD.org -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , JA OOO http://ja.openoffice.org/ http://blog.goo.ne.jp/nakatamaho/ ,GPG: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.txt ----Next_Part(Wed_Apr_11_10_51_51_2012_794)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename=patch-octave-and-forges ? ports/math/octave-forge-ad/files ? ports/math/octave-forge-odepkg/files ? ports/math/octave-forge-parallel/files/patch-configure Index: ports/benchmarks/octave-forge-benchmark/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/benchmarks/octave-forge-benchmark/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.9 Makefile --- ports/benchmarks/octave-forge-benchmark/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:39 -0000 1.9 +++ ports/benchmarks/octave-forge-benchmark/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-benchmark PORTVERSION= 1.1.1 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= benchmarks math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.137 diff -u -r1.137 Makefile --- ports/math/octave/Makefile 14 Feb 2012 12:45:24 -0000 1.137 +++ ports/math/octave/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -6,8 +6,7 @@ # PORTNAME= octave -PORTVERSION= 3.4.3 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTVERSION= 3.6.1 CATEGORIES= math MASTER_SITES= ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/octave/ \ ftp://ftp.u-aizu.ac.jp/pub/SciEng/numanal/Octave/bleeding-edge/ @@ -126,7 +125,7 @@ @${FIND} -s $d -type d -depth | \ ${SED} -e 's,^${PREFIX}/,@dirrm ,' >> ${WRKDIR}/PLIST .endfor -.for d in ${PREFIX}/libexec/octave/${OCTAVE_VERSION} ${PREFIX}/libexec/octave/api-v45+ ${PREFIX}/libexec/octave/site ${PREFIX}/lib/octave/site +.for d in ${PREFIX}/libexec/octave/${OCTAVE_VERSION} ${PREFIX}/libexec/octave/api-v45+ ${PREFIX}/libexec/octave/api-v48+ ${PREFIX}/libexec/octave/site ${PREFIX}/lib/octave/site @${FIND} -s $d -type d -empty | \ ${SED} -e 's,^${PREFIX}/,@exec ${MKDIR} %D/,' \ -e 's,$$, 2>/dev/null || true,' >> ${WRKDIR}/PLIST Index: ports/math/octave/distinfo =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave/distinfo,v retrieving revision 1.35 diff -u -r1.35 distinfo --- ports/math/octave/distinfo 8 Nov 2011 09:28:31 -0000 1.35 +++ ports/math/octave/distinfo 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -SHA256 (octave-3.4.3.tar.bz2) = 94d119cc93a38465e9c00dd36b9cc063abbda7ae8cb39407cf88a2bddc9dc148 -SIZE (octave-3.4.3.tar.bz2) = 15085117 +SHA256 (octave-3.6.1.tar.bz2) = f8073ee7570d8ff78864868027ef1e08409a78e0798d8800fac67e7e714eadf6 +SIZE (octave-3.6.1.tar.bz2) = 15387369 Index: ports/math/octave-forge/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.53 diff -u -r1.53 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge/Makefile 16 Feb 2012 15:57:02 -0000 1.53 +++ ports/math/octave-forge/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge PORTVERSION= 20120206 -PORTREVISION= 1 +PORTREVISION= 2 CATEGORIES= math MASTER_SITES= #none DISTFILES= #none @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ DICOM "Install package: dicom" On \ ECONOMETRICS "Install package: econometrics" On \ ENGINE "Install package: engine" On \ - ES "Install package: es" On \ + ES "Install package: es" Off \ FENV "Install package: fenv" On \ FITS "Install package: fits" On \ FINANCIAL "Install package: financial" On \ Index: ports/math/octave-forge-actuarial/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-actuarial/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.5 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-actuarial/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:33 -0000 1.5 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-actuarial/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-actuarial PORTVERSION= 1.1.0 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTREVISION= 3 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-ad/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-ad/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.12 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-ad/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:39 -0000 1.12 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-ad/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,12 +7,14 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-ad PORTVERSION= 1.0.6 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org COMMENT= Octave-forge package ${OCTAVE_PKGNAME} + GNU_CONFIGURE= yes +USE_DOS2UNIX= yes .include .include "${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.octave.mk" Index: ports/math/octave-forge-audio/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-audio/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.12 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-audio/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:39 -0000 1.12 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-audio/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-audio PORTVERSION= 1.1.4 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-bim/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-bim/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.18 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-bim/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:34 -0000 1.18 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-bim/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-bim PORTVERSION= 1.0.2 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-bioinfo/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-bioinfo/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-bioinfo/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:40 -0000 1.11 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-bioinfo/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-bioinfo PORTVERSION= 0.1.2 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-civil-engineering/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-civil-engineering/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-civil-engineering/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:40 -0000 1.11 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-civil-engineering/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-civil-engineering PORTVERSION= 1.0.7 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-combinatorics/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-combinatorics/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.12 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-combinatorics/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:40 -0000 1.12 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-combinatorics/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-combinatorics PORTVERSION= 1.0.9 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-communications/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-communications/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.15 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-communications/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:34 -0000 1.15 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-communications/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-communications PORTVERSION= 1.1.0 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org @@ -24,6 +25,9 @@ .include .include "${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.octave.mk" +post-patch: + ${REINPLACE_CMD} -e s/LU/galoisLU/g ${WRKSRC}/* + post-build: ${RM} -f ${WRKSRC}/Makefile ${WRKSRC}/configure cd ${WRKDIR} && ${TAR} cfz ${DISTNAME}.tar.gz ${OCTSRC} Index: ports/math/octave-forge-control/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-control/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.26 diff -u -r1.26 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-control/Makefile 12 Feb 2012 22:26:51 -0000 1.26 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-control/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-control PORTVERSION= 2.2.5 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-data-smoothing/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-data-smoothing/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.14 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-data-smoothing/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:34 -0000 1.14 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-data-smoothing/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-data-smoothing PORTVERSION= 1.2.3 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-dataframe/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-dataframe/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.7 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-dataframe/Makefile 23 Feb 2012 16:44:47 -0000 1.7 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-dataframe/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-dataframe PORTVERSION= 0.9.1 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-dicom/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-dicom/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.3 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-dicom/Makefile 2 Jan 2012 17:06:34 -0000 1.3 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-dicom/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-dicom PORTVERSION= 0.1.1 -PORTREVISION= 1 +PORTREVISION= 2 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-econometrics/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-econometrics/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-econometrics/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:41 -0000 1.11 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-econometrics/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-econometrics PORTVERSION= 1.0.8 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-engine/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-engine/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.12 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-engine/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:41 -0000 1.12 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-engine/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-engine PORTVERSION= 1.0.9 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-es/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-es/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.7 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-es/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:34 -0000 1.7 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-es/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,12 +7,14 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-es PORTVERSION= 0.0.4 -PORTREVISION= 3 +PORTREVISION= 4 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org COMMENT= Octave-forge package ${OCTAVE_PKGNAME} +BROKEN= "Does not build" + # OCTSRC is the name of the directory of the package. # It is usually ${OCTAVE_PKGNAME} or ${DISTNAME}. OCTSRC= ${OCTAVE_PKGNAME} Index: ports/math/octave-forge-fenv/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-fenv/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.5 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-fenv/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:34 -0000 1.5 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-fenv/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-fenv PORTVERSION= 0.1.0 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTREVISION= 3 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-financial/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-financial/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.12 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-financial/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:41 -0000 1.12 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-financial/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-financial PORTVERSION= 0.3.2 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-fits/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-fits/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.8 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-fits/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:35 -0000 1.8 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-fits/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-fits PORTVERSION= 1.0.1 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-fl-core/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-fl-core/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.5 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-fl-core/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:35 -0000 1.5 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-fl-core/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-fl-core PORTVERSION= 1.0.0 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTREVISION= 3 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-fpl/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-fpl/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -r1.16 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-fpl/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:35 -0000 1.16 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-fpl/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-fpl PORTVERSION= 1.2.0 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTREVISION= 3 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-fuzzy-logic-toolkit/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-fuzzy-logic-toolkit/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.8 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-fuzzy-logic-toolkit/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:35 -0000 1.8 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-fuzzy-logic-toolkit/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-fuzzy-logic-toolkit PORTVERSION= 0.3.0 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-ga/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-ga/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.14 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-ga/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:35 -0000 1.14 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-ga/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-ga PORTVERSION= 0.9.8 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTREVISION= 3 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-general/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-general/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.14 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-general/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:35 -0000 1.14 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-general/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-general PORTVERSION= 1.2.2 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTREVISION= 3 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-generate_html/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-generate_html/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.10 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-generate_html/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:35 -0000 1.10 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-generate_html/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-generate_html PORTVERSION= 0.1.3 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTREVISION= 3 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-geometry/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-geometry/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.13 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-geometry/Makefile 25 Jan 2012 17:58:57 -0000 1.13 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-geometry/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-geometry PORTVERSION= 1.4.0 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-gnuplot/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-gnuplot/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.5 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-gnuplot/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:36 -0000 1.5 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-gnuplot/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-gnuplot PORTVERSION= 1.0.1 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTREVISION= 3 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-gsl/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-gsl/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.15 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-gsl/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:42 -0000 1.15 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-gsl/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-gsl PORTVERSION= 1.0.8 -PORTREVISION= 8 +PORTREVISION= 9 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-ident/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-ident/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-ident/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:43 -0000 1.11 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-ident/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-ident PORTVERSION= 1.0.7 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-image/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-image/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -r1.16 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-image/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:36 -0000 1.16 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-image/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-image PORTVERSION= 1.0.15 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-informationtheory/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-informationtheory/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.12 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-informationtheory/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:43 -0000 1.12 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-informationtheory/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-informationtheory PORTVERSION= 0.1.8 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-integration/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-integration/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-integration/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:43 -0000 1.11 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-integration/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-integration PORTVERSION= 1.0.7 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-io/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-io/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -r1.19 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-io/Makefile 28 Feb 2012 03:43:20 -0000 1.19 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-io/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-io PORTVERSION= 1.0.17 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-irsa/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-irsa/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-irsa/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:43 -0000 1.11 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-irsa/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-irsa PORTVERSION= 1.0.7 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-linear-algebra/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-linear-algebra/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.15 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-linear-algebra/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:36 -0000 1.15 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-linear-algebra/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-linear-algebra PORTVERSION= 2.1.0 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-mapping/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-mapping/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-mapping/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:44 -0000 1.11 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-mapping/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-mapping PORTVERSION= 1.0.7 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-mechanics/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-mechanics/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.6 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-mechanics/Makefile 7 Jan 2012 01:07:17 -0000 1.6 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-mechanics/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-mechanics PORTVERSION= 1.2.0 -PORTREVISION= 1 +PORTREVISION= 2 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-miscellaneous/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-miscellaneous/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.14 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-miscellaneous/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:36 -0000 1.14 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-miscellaneous/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-miscellaneous PORTVERSION= 1.0.11 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTREVISION= 3 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-missing-functions/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-missing-functions/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-missing-functions/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:44 -0000 1.11 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-missing-functions/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-missing-functions PORTVERSION= 1.0.2 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-msh/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-msh/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -r1.16 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-msh/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:37 -0000 1.16 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-msh/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-msh PORTVERSION= 1.0.2 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTREVISION= 3 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-multicore/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-multicore/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.12 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-multicore/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:44 -0000 1.12 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-multicore/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-multicore PORTVERSION= 0.2.15 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-nan/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-nan/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -r1.17 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-nan/Makefile 10 Feb 2012 23:08:16 -0000 1.17 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-nan/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-nan PORTVERSION= 2.5.2 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-nlwing2/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-nlwing2/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.12 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-nlwing2/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:37 -0000 1.12 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-nlwing2/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-nlwing2 PORTVERSION= 1.2.0 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTREVISION= 3 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-nnet/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-nnet/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.14 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-nnet/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:37 -0000 1.14 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-nnet/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-nnet PORTVERSION= 0.1.13 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTREVISION= 3 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-nurbs/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-nurbs/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.15 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-nurbs/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:37 -0000 1.15 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-nurbs/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-nurbs PORTVERSION= 1.3.5 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-ocs/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-ocs/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -r1.16 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-ocs/Makefile 23 Jan 2012 13:59:47 -0000 1.16 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-ocs/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-ocs PORTVERSION= 0.1.3 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-oct2mat/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-oct2mat/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.9 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-oct2mat/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:45 -0000 1.9 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-oct2mat/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-oct2mat PORTVERSION= 1.0.7 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-octcdf/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-octcdf/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -r1.16 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-octcdf/Makefile 22 Feb 2012 14:38:29 -0000 1.16 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-octcdf/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-octcdf PORTVERSION= 1.1.4 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-octclip/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-octclip/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.4 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-octclip/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:37 -0000 1.4 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-octclip/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-octclip PORTVERSION= 1.0.0 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTREVISION= 3 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-octgpr/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-octgpr/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.13 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-octgpr/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:38 -0000 1.13 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-octgpr/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-octgpr PORTVERSION= 1.2.0 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTREVISION= 3 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-octproj/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-octproj/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.7 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-octproj/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:38 -0000 1.7 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-octproj/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-octproj PORTVERSION= 1.0.2 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTREVISION= 3 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-odebvp/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-odebvp/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-odebvp/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:46 -0000 1.11 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-odebvp/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-odebvp PORTVERSION= 1.0.6 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-odepkg/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-odepkg/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -r1.17 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-odepkg/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:38 -0000 1.17 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-odepkg/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-odepkg PORTVERSION= 0.8.0 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTREVISION= 3 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-optim/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-optim/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.18 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-optim/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:38 -0000 1.18 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-optim/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-optim PORTVERSION= 1.0.17 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-optiminterp/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-optiminterp/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.13 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-optiminterp/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:38 -0000 1.13 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-optiminterp/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-optiminterp PORTVERSION= 0.3.3 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTREVISION= 3 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-outliers/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-outliers/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-outliers/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:46 -0000 1.11 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-outliers/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-outliers PORTVERSION= 0.13.9 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-parallel/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-parallel/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.15 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-parallel/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:38 -0000 1.15 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-parallel/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-parallel PORTVERSION= 2.0.5 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTREVISION= 3 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-pdb/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-pdb/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-pdb/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:47 -0000 1.11 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-pdb/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-pdb PORTVERSION= 1.0.7 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-physicalconstants/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-physicalconstants/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-physicalconstants/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:47 -0000 1.11 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-physicalconstants/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-physicalconstants PORTVERSION= 0.1.7 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-plot/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-plot/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.14 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-plot/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:38 -0000 1.14 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-plot/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-plot PORTVERSION= 1.1.0 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-pt_br/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-pt_br/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.15 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-pt_br/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:39 -0000 1.15 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-pt_br/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-pt_br PORTVERSION= 1.0.9 -PORTREVISION= 3 +PORTREVISION= 4 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-quaternion/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-quaternion/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.7 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-quaternion/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:47 -0000 1.7 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-quaternion/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-quaternion PORTVERSION= 1.0.0 -PORTREVISION= 4 +PORTREVISION= 5 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-queueing/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-queueing/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -r1.1 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-queueing/Makefile 6 Feb 2012 19:42:56 -0000 1.1 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-queueing/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-queueing PORTVERSION= 1.0.0 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-secs1d/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-secs1d/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-secs1d/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:47 -0000 1.11 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-secs1d/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-secs1d PORTVERSION= 0.0.8 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-secs2d/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-secs2d/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-secs2d/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:47 -0000 1.11 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-secs2d/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-secs2d PORTVERSION= 0.0.8 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-secs3d/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-secs3d/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.3 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-secs3d/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:39 -0000 1.3 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-secs3d/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-secs3d PORTVERSION= 0.0.1 -PORTREVISION= 1 +PORTREVISION= 2 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-signal/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-signal/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -r1.16 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-signal/Makefile 18 Jan 2012 22:56:28 -0000 1.16 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-signal/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-signal PORTVERSION= 1.1.2 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-simp/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-simp/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.8 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-simp/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:48 -0000 1.8 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-simp/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-simp PORTVERSION= 1.1.0 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-sockets/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-sockets/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.13 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-sockets/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:39 -0000 1.13 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-sockets/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-sockets PORTVERSION= 1.0.7 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTREVISION= 3 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-specfun/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-specfun/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.14 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-specfun/Makefile 15 Dec 2011 03:47:23 -0000 1.14 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-specfun/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-specfun PORTVERSION= 1.1.0 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-special-matrix/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-special-matrix/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-special-matrix/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:48 -0000 1.11 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-special-matrix/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-special-matrix PORTVERSION= 1.0.7 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-spline-gcvspl/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-spline-gcvspl/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.12 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-spline-gcvspl/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:48 -0000 1.12 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-spline-gcvspl/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-spline-gcvspl PORTVERSION= 1.0.8 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-splines/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-splines/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-splines/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:48 -0000 1.11 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-splines/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-splines PORTVERSION= 1.0.7 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-statistics/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-statistics/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.15 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-statistics/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:39 -0000 1.15 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-statistics/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-statistics PORTVERSION= 1.1.0 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-strings/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-strings/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-strings/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:49 -0000 1.11 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-strings/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-strings PORTVERSION= 1.0.7 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-struct/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-struct/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.14 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-struct/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:39 -0000 1.14 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-struct/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-struct PORTVERSION= 1.0.9 -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTREVISION= 3 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-symband/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-symband/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.12 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-symband/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:49 -0000 1.12 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-symband/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-symband PORTVERSION= 1.0.10 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-symbolic/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-symbolic/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -r1.17 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-symbolic/Makefile 21 Nov 2011 01:17:40 -0000 1.17 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-symbolic/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-symbolic PORTVERSION= 1.1.0 -PORTREVISION= 1 +PORTREVISION= 2 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-tcl-octave/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-tcl-octave/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.12 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-tcl-octave/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:49 -0000 1.12 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-tcl-octave/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-tcl-octave PORTVERSION= 0.1.8 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-time/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-time/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-time/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:49 -0000 1.11 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-time/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-time PORTVERSION= 1.0.9 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-tsa/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-tsa/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -r1.16 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-tsa/Makefile 13 Feb 2012 14:37:39 -0000 1.16 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-tsa/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-tsa PORTVERSION= 4.2.2 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-video/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-video/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.15 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-video/Makefile 16 Feb 2012 15:57:02 -0000 1.15 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-video/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-video PORTVERSION= 1.0.2 -PORTREVISION= 8 +PORTREVISION= 9 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-xraylib/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-xraylib/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.12 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-xraylib/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:50 -0000 1.12 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-xraylib/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-xraylib PORTVERSION= 1.0.8 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org Index: ports/math/octave-forge-zenity/Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge-zenity/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 Makefile --- ports/math/octave-forge-zenity/Makefile 30 Jun 2011 20:55:50 -0000 1.11 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-zenity/Makefile 11 Apr 2012 01:43:39 -0000 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= octave-forge-zenity PORTVERSION= 0.5.7 -PORTREVISION= 5 +PORTREVISION= 6 CATEGORIES= math MAINTAINER= stephen@FreeBSD.org --- /dev/null 2012-04-11 10:44:12.000000000 +0900 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-odepkg/files/patch-odepkg_auxiliary_functions.cc 2012-04-02 13:59:35.000000000 +0900 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +--- odepkg_auxiliary_functions.cc-orig 2012-03-30 23:51:38.000000000 +0000 ++++ odepkg_auxiliary_functions.cc 2012-03-30 23:52:36.000000000 +0000 +@@ -454,8 +454,8 @@ + // eg. if the code should be debuged or something like this + vt = octave_value (vtstore); + vy = octave_value (vystore); +- vt.print_with_name (octave_stdout, "vt", true); +- vy.print_with_name (octave_stdout, "vy", true); ++ vt.print_with_name (octave_stdout, "vt"); ++ vy.print_with_name (octave_stdout, "vy"); + break; + } + --- /dev/null 2012-04-11 10:44:33.000000000 +0900 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-ad/files/patch-src_ov-grad.cc 2012-04-02 13:59:35.000000000 +0900 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +--- src/ov-grad.cc-orig 2012-03-30 23:31:24.000000000 +0000 ++++ src/ov-grad.cc 2012-03-30 23:31:56.000000000 +0000 +@@ -71,10 +71,10 @@ + + void octave_gradient::print (std::ostream& os, bool pr_as_read_syntax) const + { +- x ().print_with_name (os, "value", true); ++ x ().print_with_name (os, "value"); + // print (partial) derivative(s), + // following convention i-th row = nabla(x_i)T +- jacobian ().print_with_name (os, "(partial) derivative(s)", true); ++ jacobian ().print_with_name (os, "(partial) derivative(s)"); + } + + octave_value_list octave_gradient::dotref (const octave_value_list& idx) --- /dev/null 2012-04-11 10:45:01.000000000 +0900 +++ ports/math/octave-forge-parallel/files/patch-configure 2012-04-02 13:59:35.000000000 +0900 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +--- configure-orig 2012-03-30 23:58:04.000000000 +0000 ++++ configure 2012-03-30 23:58:24.000000000 +0000 +@@ -4208,7 +4208,7 @@ + { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: yes" >&5 + $as_echo "yes" >&6; } + +-$as_echo "#define OCTAVE_LE_3_2_4 1" >>confdefs.h ++$as_echo "#undef OCTAVE_LE_3_2_4" >>confdefs.h + + fi + ----Next_Part(Wed_Apr_11_10_51_51_2012_794)---- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 11 02:05:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9871065670 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 02:05:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org) Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.49.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E17A8FC14 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 02:05:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2F4B85C3A; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:05:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:05:34 -0400 From: Wesley Shields To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120411020534.GC11697@atarininja.org> References: <4F7E498E.7070007@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F804679.2040803@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F80D4F9.9020207@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F848B92.8000504@yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F848B92.8000504@yandex.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba34-3.4.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 02:05:34 -0000 On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:35:46PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Completely offtopic, but we have a nice unauthenticated remote root > here: http://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2012-1182 It looks like the ports have just been updated. Please let the update mirror out and then update quickly! This one is particularly nasty. -- WXS From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 11 02:31:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9201106564A; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 02:31:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0BCA8FC12; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 02:31:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3B2VSHo068775; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:31:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Message-ID: <4F84ED00.50806@missouri.edu> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:31:28 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maho NAKATA References: <20120411.105151.2170094387724287111.maho@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120411.105151.2170094387724287111.maho@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: octave port will be updated to 3.6.1 and all the octave-forge ports will be updated accordingly. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 02:31:36 -0000 On 04/10/2012 08:51 PM, Maho NAKATA wrote: > Hi Stephen, and ports@ > > I would like to ask you the final check of our patch against > octave and octave-forge-* port. I also e-mail to port@ since > it is a sweeping commit. > > Now ports tree has been unfrozen. > Octave 3.6.1 is out and I would like to update with attached patch. Let me add that after this patch has been committed by Maho, I will update quite a few of the octave-forge ports: anything dated on or after 2012-03-01 on http://sourceforge.net/projects/octave/files/Octave%20Forge%20Packages/Individual%20Package%20Releases/ The reason I am delaying these updates until octave-3.6.1 is installed is that these updates only seem to work with octave-3.6.0 and later. The reason I am telling people this is that when the octave port has been updated, you might like to wait a short while before rebuilding the octave-forge ports until I have committed these later updates. Stephen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 11 03:06:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7985A106566C for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 03:06:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maho.nakata@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483438FC19 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 03:06:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbcwz17 with SMTP id wz17so741948pbc.13 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:06:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:message-id:to:cc:subject:from:in-reply-to:references :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Qx/Bh4xCE1o0ezRqjW2w0WCfiKBaH28wAfQ3wiZNr5w=; b=I8liPreWYW99wXwt+QW+05P5Pf6EZj4GeuKTY/kWrulmC6i4tfg3J0RGPRm5n5eyo6 Dfq5KkA8xAVItYQfLkjfvp95xpqK/qCTYDQVIp9NZPgPjMIOO8UUMzLE/Y9N2ytwsA2R +7Ou2eaoTGYrwr3MbmErBVH6vIJo8btK3RHFfJB/QHqlg/Ed93gMmI8dBJFGyJPjDgfy Aaoq6MtNMdElF6+cxPHjLSLLy7UH3YPkhlvF3yaif0IFDbkOo1w+Q4wAc4u40QlXcrhj y4EBRLzRvaG2VpAuPMKgbGwAZ3959WAIvjGohQUEZ4d9BzHBABalnqO/BWYFMgMCQHkb HOow== Received: by 10.68.195.233 with SMTP id ih9mr13474666pbc.128.1334113562023; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:06:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (rikad42.riken.jp. [134.160.214.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gh7sm1587172pbc.8.2012.04.10.20.06.00 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:06:01 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Maho NAKATA Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:05:58 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20120411.120558.1098872334715923093.maho@FreeBSD.org> To: stephen@missouri.edu From: Maho NAKATA In-Reply-To: <4F84ED00.50806@missouri.edu> References: <20120411.105151.2170094387724287111.maho@FreeBSD.org> <4F84ED00.50806@missouri.edu> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.4 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: octave port will be updated to 3.6.1 and all the octave-forge ports will be updated accordingly. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 03:06:02 -0000 Hi Stephen, Done from my side, now it's your turn! Best Nakata Maho From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith Subject: Re: octave port will be updated to 3.6.1 and all the octave-forge ports will be updated accordingly. Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:31:28 -0500 > On 04/10/2012 08:51 PM, Maho NAKATA wrote: >> Hi Stephen, and ports@ >> >> I would like to ask you the final check of our patch against >> octave and octave-forge-* port. I also e-mail to port@ since >> it is a sweeping commit. >> >> Now ports tree has been unfrozen. >> Octave 3.6.1 is out and I would like to update with attached patch. > > Let me add that after this patch has been committed by Maho, I will > update quite a few of the octave-forge ports: anything dated on or > after 2012-03-01 on > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/octave/files/Octave%20Forge%20Packages/Individual%20Package%20Releases/ > > The reason I am delaying these updates until octave-3.6.1 is installed > is that these updates only seem to work with octave-3.6.0 and later. > > The reason I am telling people this is that when the octave port has > been updated, you might like to wait a short while before rebuilding > the octave-forge ports until I have committed these later updates. > > Stephen > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 11 04:31:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A37C1065673; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:31:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward18.mail.yandex.net (forward18.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1402::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC8B8FC08; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:31:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp19.mail.yandex.net (smtp19.mail.yandex.net [95.108.252.19]) by forward18.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 458A11780DA7; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:31:38 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1334118698; bh=sfW+ZR25SAdLVIbiQ9ZQ6l1MnhqKSxwcO2Ie0Kzco7k=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=SITGe4lLHrnmGntBqGOk2fy8JuasFki3OcGcjoGrjE1tntNzSLCfBHJFRKdrZWKnz c2x6aZEYcmUAkY+X61amZJfuaNGlqT5dexURLFzBYYT+O0nbTNvKUa1RzIkGO1Wnzw WxDsumr3RXfpWQ6VrUjDCrjRqXjAHMcTYYVqG740= Received: from smtp19.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp19.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 192A3BE030D; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:31:38 +0400 (MSK) Received: from unknown (unknown [178.76.224.133]) by smtp19.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id Vb9eqEwX-Vb9GVChO; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:31:37 +0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1334118698; bh=sfW+ZR25SAdLVIbiQ9ZQ6l1MnhqKSxwcO2Ie0Kzco7k=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ao1qH7nBF2RyZ1je7RU72kzAtvmlW32W+ljD6Bdpcsx8MVqb32F4sKZb9PsQQyqQE tvT95yPowMoAaNkC+lB64yVEAPZnnAYzNtlIL/tZwi+PFg/5x9t6/mvHAprYdKR9pY BrNk1e1rendv2IItWDaWFbXivytl8klDT7u6wd9s= Message-ID: <4F850904.5040804@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:31:00 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wesley Shields References: <4F7E498E.7070007@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F804679.2040803@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F80D4F9.9020207@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F848B92.8000504@yandex.ru> <20120411020534.GC11697@atarininja.org> In-Reply-To: <20120411020534.GC11697@atarininja.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Xin LI , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba34-3.4.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:31:40 -0000 Wesley Shields wrote on 11.04.2012 06:05: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:35:46PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: >> Completely offtopic, but we have a nice unauthenticated remote root >> here: http://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2012-1182 > > It looks like the ports have just been updated. Please let the update > mirror out and then update quickly! This one is particularly nasty. > > -- WXS Yes, that was extremely quick update. Thank you Xin Li! But at least for samba34 I was forced to fetch tarball manually because of "Moved permanently" messages. Some MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR updates should be done to make it work. Thanks. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 11 05:41:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DF71065755; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 05:41:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53AE08FC0A; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 05:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3B5fM7B081810; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:41:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Message-ID: <4F851982.7030004@missouri.edu> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:41:22 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maho NAKATA References: <20120411.105151.2170094387724287111.maho@FreeBSD.org> <4F84ED00.50806@missouri.edu> <20120411.120558.1098872334715923093.maho@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120411.120558.1098872334715923093.maho@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: octave port will be updated to 3.6.1 and all the octave-forge ports will be updated accordingly. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 05:41:23 -0000 I'm now done as well. On 04/10/2012 10:05 PM, Maho NAKATA wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > Done from my side, now it's your turn! > > Best > Nakata Maho > > From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith > Subject: Re: octave port will be updated to 3.6.1 and all the octave-forge ports will be updated accordingly. > Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:31:28 -0500 > >> On 04/10/2012 08:51 PM, Maho NAKATA wrote: >>> Hi Stephen, and ports@ >>> >>> I would like to ask you the final check of our patch against >>> octave and octave-forge-* port. I also e-mail to port@ since >>> it is a sweeping commit. >>> >>> Now ports tree has been unfrozen. >>> Octave 3.6.1 is out and I would like to update with attached patch. >> >> Let me add that after this patch has been committed by Maho, I will >> update quite a few of the octave-forge ports: anything dated on or >> after 2012-03-01 on >> >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/octave/files/Octave%20Forge%20Packages/Individual%20Package%20Releases/ >> >> The reason I am delaying these updates until octave-3.6.1 is installed >> is that these updates only seem to work with octave-3.6.0 and later. >> >> The reason I am telling people this is that when the octave port has >> been updated, you might like to wait a short while before rebuilding >> the octave-forge ports until I have committed these later updates. >> >> Stephen >> > > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 11 06:09:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 955761065673 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:09:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@acm.org) Received: from fallbackmx06.syd.optusnet.com.au (fallbackmx06.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 215218FC0C for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:09:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail30.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail30.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.133.193]) by fallbackmx06.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q3B69k46009572 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:09:46 +1000 Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (c220-239-251-180.belrs5.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.251.180]) by mail30.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q3B69cq0027167 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:09:39 +1000 X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (localhost.vk2pj.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3B69cjj063962; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:09:38 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q3B69bbK063961; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:09:37 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:09:37 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith Message-ID: <20120411060937.GA62949@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <4F839499.8050103@missouri.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F839499.8050103@missouri.edu> X-PGP-Key: http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: autodetecting dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:09:54 -0000 --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2012-Apr-09 21:02:01 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >So suppose we are building port A. It turns out that the configure in=20 >port A autodetects whether package B is present or not. It will build=20 >either way. But if built with package B, it will not operate without it. =2E.. >What are the accepted ways of handling this? > >1. Don't worry about it. tinderbox builds will never build port A in=20 >the presence of package B. > >2. Have the Makefile of port A detect whether package B is installed,=20 >and if it is then add B as a dependency of A. > >3. Cripple the configure in port A so that it doesn't autodetect for=20 >package B. Preference order is 3, 2, 1. 1 is the least desirable because the resultant packages may include implicit dependencies without explicit dependencies. It can also cause subtle problems when port B is updated without updating port A. --=20 Peter Jeremy --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+FICEACgkQ/opHv/APuIfWGACfcS9edoYHBZ2ZprJUm8SN84/c WTYAn0wqN2bDsnb5fflqfLSRdImF9Tl5 =80f4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 11 06:16:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B5F1065670 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:16:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ws@au.dyndns.ws) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:2:6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E188FC0A for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:16:16 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArUEAJAghU+WZWdv/2dsb2JhbABCgym3LIIJAQEEAXkFCwsOCi5XBhOICQS3PJE/BIhYkwaKRIJ3 Received: from ppp103-111.static.internode.on.net (HELO lillith-iv.ovirt.dyndns.ws) ([150.101.103.111]) by ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2012 15:46:14 +0930 X-Envelope-From: ws@au.dyndns.ws X-Envelope-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from [172.17.17.134] (ws@[172.17.17.134]) by lillith-iv.ovirt.dyndns.ws (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3B6G2A5077440; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:46:03 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from ws@au.dyndns.ws) From: Wayne Sierke To: Greg Byshenk In-Reply-To: <20120410204737.GA1737@portland1.byshenk.net> References: <20120410195541.GA62066@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120410204737.GA1737@portland1.byshenk.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ASCII" Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:46:01 +0930 Message-ID: <1334124961.1385.7.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 172.17.17.142 X-Scanned-By: SpamAssassin 3.003002(2011-06-06) X-Scanned-By: ClamAV X-Spam-Score: -2.9 () ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 Cc: Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg version -Xs foo shows all ports, not just foo X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:16:17 -0000 On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 13:47 -0700, Greg Byshenk wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:55:41PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > BUZI> pkg version -Xs Image > > CalculiX-2.4 = > > GraphicsMagick-1.1.15_3,1 = > > ImageMagick-6.7.5.10 = > > ORBit2-2.14.19 = > > OpenEXR-1.6.1_3 = > > R-2.14.2 = > > ^C > > BUZI> > > > > The man page seems to indicate that the > > above options should only show ImageMagick. > > > > What am I doing wrong? Is it a transcription error or are you really using a command named "pkg" rather than pkg_version(1)? > I'm not sure if it's a bug or a feature, but pkg_version seems to > want the arguments separately. > > $ pkg_version -X -s Image > ImageMagick = > $ Works ok here: $ uname -v ; pkg_version -Xs "lib[Xx]c" FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 #0: Tue Sep 27 18:45:57 UTC 2011 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC libXcomposite = libXcursor = libxcb = $ %uname -v ; pkg_version -Xs "lib[Xx]c" FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 #0: Tue Sep 27 18:07:27 UTC 2011 root@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC libXcomposite = libXcursor = libxcb = %pkg_version -Xs Image ImageMagick = % From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 11 07:07:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1D6106564A for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:07:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlaffaye.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C921D8FC0A for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:07:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaaf13 with SMTP id f13so128039eaa.13 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:07:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Swu8b5NZy9g242K7eJ8O0AeOwZuxrOsTJJilJs3p++g=; b=cBdFFD2ZY9KdjOhOCMlySr9dSSiQRqGZTMA2aD2yF1SVe0QfTy8G/c4bumOqEg4vaU 5v+9lo5lmYv9K8vXhBNxIEd+1piOcLvUURonA1JjCqUNXcNyTfnO5W0t4ncYubwzcaLY L57Cl+22kzmI3uYiGgYjLSSVyM+9l2J8qirQGF1ByG0Q+uHPgPnn0+zSVFRXwqPstnW9 iIusExhXuJsVu5ce5gX+tc+QqBf+zTTpcNpkx2/sVbf2li9rL5xcBu0nv9o6PdWwzUmL DqN4hD+bM9tVh3kBx6wFy0RcWXgK0M+nqk6TTsYRDxoFXMLGGJdopT6CSF2U7+yqkau4 6Z7g== Received: by 10.213.105.132 with SMTP id t4mr902580ebo.107.1334128027084; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:07:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (lantea.jlaffaye.net. [109.190.125.169]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d54sm8089707eei.9.2012.04.11.00.07.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:07:05 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Julien Laffaye Message-ID: <4F852DA1.4020900@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:07:13 +0200 From: Julien Laffaye User-Agent: Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wayne Sierke References: <20120410195541.GA62066@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120410204737.GA1737@portland1.byshenk.net> <1334124961.1385.7.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> In-Reply-To: <1334124961.1385.7.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Greg Byshenk Subject: Re: pkg version -Xs foo shows all ports, not just foo X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:07:14 -0000 On 4/11/2012 8:16 AM, Wayne Sierke wrote: > On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 13:47 -0700, Greg Byshenk wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:55:41PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >>> BUZI> pkg version -Xs Image >>> CalculiX-2.4 = >>> GraphicsMagick-1.1.15_3,1 = >>> ImageMagick-6.7.5.10 = >>> ORBit2-2.14.19 = >>> OpenEXR-1.6.1_3 = >>> R-2.14.2 = >>> ^C >>> BUZI> >>> >>> The man page seems to indicate that the >>> above options should only show ImageMagick. >>> >>> What am I doing wrong? > Is it a transcription error or are you really using a command named > "pkg" rather than pkg_version(1)? I think he is using pkgng. >> I'm not sure if it's a bug or a feature, but pkg_version seems to >> want the arguments separately. >> >> $ pkg_version -X -s Image >> ImageMagick = >> $ > Works ok here: > > $ uname -v ; pkg_version -Xs "lib[Xx]c" > FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 #0: Tue Sep 27 18:45:57 UTC 2011 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > libXcomposite = > libXcursor = > libxcb = > $ > %uname -v ; pkg_version -Xs "lib[Xx]c" > FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 #0: Tue Sep 27 18:07:27 UTC 2011 root@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > libXcomposite = > libXcursor = > libxcb = > %pkg_version -Xs Image > ImageMagick = > % > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 11 07:49:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73CD106566B; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spil.oss@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301AC8FC0A; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaaf13 with SMTP id f13so139809eaa.13 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:49:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=fFMRu6CvLm7lM21cGBN5XbFBf/Qm+BmdeQi1Wr9Sl/k=; b=LnoiOXPngYccgZqK/5Fk3HSWiOmKm0g+JpSF3/flTvbqLMJzQyUAYHy9WKkRya+gg/ LGDzlYr5mYw8s4o3+DYNufvON7D9GPnToWGUL5BQk0YsTBOHfEWqlsccswKLrLHoxzNT HGwhBkRGtr8Lw7NiArpoEN77dSVl7MyZjjbVEMsxFIBMtSj0m3dYNIHocHYLXcyZnpaX cclhdX3d22DfxlKXDh8vxSMruiqkm+hbfIMuNHDm2zR1vP0o6APRq30hxMp1YQqIIcu1 FC4+eeDx0j2HwCqXcdnONocF0UNBYAAxVGaKtMyMBUmTsDDNVJ2dQQnX+byZkXiQb/d+ jjJA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.101.74 with SMTP id a50mr1808532eeg.60.1334130586361; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:49:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.22.148 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:49:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201204102321.q3ANLVph019715@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201204102321.q3ANLVph019715@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:49:46 +0200 Message-ID: From: Spil Oss To: miwi@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: ports/160821: audio/libmp3splt: Building WITHOUT_ID3 fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: spil.oss@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:49:47 -0000 On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:21 AM, wrote: > Synopsis: audio/libmp3splt: Building WITHOUT_ID3 fails > > State-Changed-From-To: suspended->closed > State-Changed-By: miwi > State-Changed-When: Tue Apr 10 23:21:31 UTC 2012 > State-Changed-Why: > close, feedback timeout > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=160821 Hi, Upstream has patched this and released new versions of mp3splt and libmp3splt. Now creating patches for both ports, will report back in this thread. Kind regards, Spil. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 11 08:01:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B1D106564A; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:01:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spil.oss@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1763B8FC08; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:01:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eekd17 with SMTP id d17so149293eek.13 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 01:01:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+gc1fom776A4fVe5PDKTVhNjh9vBeXKeW6hlRlBabvs=; b=UTOzoYo6kxISc0K2wb0XfFdOma6RCEc4w/q2T1jOp3d/hHwqmc+jkSnHnFGqUMzphy R7Plns5q304RN1b/HZpd6U+hNIo4iMrzyiRCkzP4mkdlHf5dv3nHr4vkvr9Qiivb3ZZY oS8adXFvi03lADdoBXTJNDubZ1KmPrZwENCV6fajqzn8CykO/JcLwF6BMdcBD/dcbv4R RgIJRzTVHDp8gxl3qDznn8k9dULINzBGkygAQj9FHpNoGlsd5Lkb9Gbt+oRjC16Rwi3n BiO66toZBLcVsVsBVklVrkLbWGAsYEyvjVv8tWUSVyWiIUYsJzNNLN+FMgaA0ZHwD0SK Xtcw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.16.75 with SMTP id n11mr868128eba.175.1334131317909; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 01:01:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.22.148 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 01:01:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201204102321.q3ANLVph019715@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:01:57 +0200 Message-ID: From: Spil Oss To: miwi@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Anton Yuzhaninov Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=0015174c169e49aaa004bd62a7a4 Cc: Subject: Re: ports/160821: audio/libmp3splt: Building WITHOUT_ID3 fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: spil.oss@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:01:59 -0000 --0015174c169e49aaa004bd62a7a4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Please find patches for libmp3splt and mp3splt attached. libmp3splt from 0.7_1 to 0.7.1 and mp3splt 2.4 to 2.4.1 as per upstream http://mp3splt.sourceforge.net/mp3splt_page/downloads.php Tested build with clang Tested libmp3splt WITH_ID3 and WITHOUT_ID3 both working Kind regards, Spil. On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Spil Oss wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:21 AM, =A0 wrote: >> Synopsis: audio/libmp3splt: Building WITHOUT_ID3 fails >> >> State-Changed-From-To: suspended->closed >> State-Changed-By: miwi >> State-Changed-When: Tue Apr 10 23:21:31 UTC 2012 >> State-Changed-Why: >> close, feedback timeout >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D160821 > > Hi, > > Upstream has patched this and released new versions of mp3splt and libmp3= splt. > > Now creating patches for both ports, will report back in this thread. > > Kind regards, > > Spil. --0015174c169e49aaa004bd62a7a4 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="libmp3splt-0.7.1.patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="libmp3splt-0.7.1.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_h0w3abuo0 ZGlmZiAtcnVOIGxpYm1wM3NwbHQub3JpZy9NYWtlZmlsZSBsaWJtcDNzcGx0L01ha2VmaWxlCi0t LSBsaWJtcDNzcGx0Lm9yaWcvTWFrZWZpbGUJMjAxMi0wNC0xMSAwOTo1MTowNS4wMDAwMDAwMDAg KzAyMDAKKysrIGxpYm1wM3NwbHQvTWFrZWZpbGUJMjAxMi0wNC0xMSAwOTo0MDo1NS4wMDAwMDAw MDAgKzAyMDAKQEAgLTYsOCArNiw4IEBACiAjCiAKIFBPUlROQU1FPQlsaWJtcDNzcGx0Ci1QT1JU VkVSU0lPTj0JMC43Ci1QT1JUUkVWSVNJT049CTEKK1BPUlRWRVJTSU9OPQkwLjcuMQorUE9SVFJF VklTSU9OPQkwCiBDQVRFR09SSUVTPQlhdWRpbwogTUFTVEVSX1NJVEVTPQlTRi9tcDNzcGx0LyR7 UE9SVE5BTUV9LyR7UE9SVFZFUlNJT059CiAKZGlmZiAtcnVOIGxpYm1wM3NwbHQub3JpZy9kaXN0 aW5mbyBsaWJtcDNzcGx0L2Rpc3RpbmZvCi0tLSBsaWJtcDNzcGx0Lm9yaWcvZGlzdGluZm8JMjAx Mi0wNC0xMSAwOTo1MToyOC4wMDAwMDAwMDAgKzAyMDAKKysrIGxpYm1wM3NwbHQvZGlzdGluZm8J MjAxMi0wNC0xMSAwOTo0MjoxMS4wMDAwMDAwMDAgKzAyMDAKQEAgLTEsMiArMSwyIEBACi1TSEEy NTYgKGxpYm1wM3NwbHQtMC43LnRhci5neikgPSBmNzMwOTNkZTFiZmYyNDkyZDVmNTJiMWZhYjI2 MDhiNGZiNWVjZDAyN2M4ZDYyNjcyZWZiOTJmZGU1ZjVkYjI2Ci1TSVpFIChsaWJtcDNzcGx0LTAu Ny50YXIuZ3opID0gNjI4Mzg0CitTSEEyNTYgKGxpYm1wM3NwbHQtMC43LjEudGFyLmd6KSA9IGMw MDY0MzZkYjI5M2EyMWRhMmViYzY1Y2VhZWNmNzc1Y2JmNjk0YjgyYjIwYTg1MDZiODI3ZTIzNmQ3 ZTBlNzMKK1NJWkUgKGxpYm1wM3NwbHQtMC43LjEudGFyLmd6KSA9IDYzODY3MgpkaWZmIC1ydU4g bGlibXAzc3BsdC5vcmlnL2ZpbGVzL3BhdGNoLXNyYy1vZm9ybWF0X3BhcnNlci5jIGxpYm1wM3Nw bHQvZmlsZXMvcGF0Y2gtc3JjLW9mb3JtYXRfcGFyc2VyLmMKLS0tIGxpYm1wM3NwbHQub3JpZy9m aWxlcy9wYXRjaC1zcmMtb2Zvcm1hdF9wYXJzZXIuYwkyMDEyLTA0LTExIDA5OjUxOjUxLjAwMDAw MDAwMCArMDIwMAorKysgbGlibXAzc3BsdC9maWxlcy9wYXRjaC1zcmMtb2Zvcm1hdF9wYXJzZXIu YwkyMDEyLTA0LTExIDA5OjQ2OjMyLjAwMDAwMDAwMCArMDIwMApAQCAtMSwxMSArMSwxMSBAQAot LS0tIHNyYy9vZm9ybWF0X3BhcnNlci5jLm9yaWcJMjAxMC0wOS0wNyAwNToxMjowNS4wMDAwMDAw MDAgKzA4MDAKLSsrKyBzcmMvb2Zvcm1hdF9wYXJzZXIuYwkyMDEwLTA5LTI5IDE2OjEyOjExLjAw MDAwMDAwMCArMDgwMAotQEAgLTc2MCw3ICs3NjAsNyBAQAotICAgaWYgKHRvdGFsX3RpbWUgPiAw KQorLS0tIHNyYy9vZm9ybWF0X3BhcnNlci5jLm9yaWcJMjAxMS0xMS0xMSAyMjoxNDowMy4wMDAw MDAwMDAgKzAxMDAKKysrKyBzcmMvb2Zvcm1hdF9wYXJzZXIuYwkyMDEyLTA0LTExIDA5OjQ1OjUy LjAwMDAwMDAwMCArMDIwMAorQEAgLTMwMSw3ICszMDEsNyBAQAorICAgfQorIAorICAgbG9uZyBt aW51dGVzID0gdG90YWxfdGltZSAvIDEwMCAvIDYwOworLSAgaW50IGkgPSAoaW50KSAobG9nMTBs KChsb25nIGRvdWJsZSkgbWludXRlcykpOworKyAgaW50IGkgPSAoaW50KSAobG9nMTAobWludXRl cykpOworICAgY2hhciBudW1iZXJfb2ZfZGlnaXRzID0gKGNoYXIpIChpICsgJzEnKTsKKyAgIGlm IChudW1iZXJfb2ZfZGlnaXRzID09ICcxJykKICAgIHsKLSAgICAgbG9uZyBtaW51dGVzID0gdG90 YWxfdGltZSAvIDEwMCAvIDYwOwotLSAgICBpbnQgaSA9IChpbnQpIChsb2cxMGwoKGxvbmcgZG91 YmxlKSBtaW51dGVzKSk7Ci0rICAgIGludCBpID0gKGludCkgKGxvZzEwKG1pbnV0ZXMpKTsKLSAg ICAgY2hhciBudW1iZXJfb2ZfZGlnaXRzID0gKGNoYXIpIChpICsgJzEnKTsKLSAgICAgaWYgKG51 bWJlcl9vZl9kaWdpdHMgPT0gJzEnKQotICAgICB7Cg== --0015174c169e49aaa004bd62a7a4 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="mp3splt-2.4.1.patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="mp3splt-2.4.1.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_h0w3aotj1 ZGlmZiAtcnVOIG1wM3NwbHQub3JpZy9NYWtlZmlsZSBtcDNzcGx0L01ha2VmaWxlCi0tLSBtcDNz cGx0Lm9yaWcvTWFrZWZpbGUJMjAxMS0wOS0yNCAwMDoyMTowNy4wMDAwMDAwMDAgKzAyMDAKKysr IG1wM3NwbHQvTWFrZWZpbGUJMjAxMi0wNC0xMSAwOTo1NDowOS4wMDAwMDAwMDAgKzAyMDAKQEAg LTYsNyArNiw3IEBACiAjCiAKIFBPUlROQU1FPQltcDNzcGx0Ci1QT1JUVkVSU0lPTj0JMi40CitQ T1JUVkVSU0lPTj0JMi40LjEKIENBVEVHT1JJRVM9CWF1ZGlvCiBNQVNURVJfU0lURVM9CVNGCiAK ZGlmZiAtcnVOIG1wM3NwbHQub3JpZy9kaXN0aW5mbyBtcDNzcGx0L2Rpc3RpbmZvCi0tLSBtcDNz cGx0Lm9yaWcvZGlzdGluZm8JMjAxMS0wOS0xNiAxODowMDozNi4wMDAwMDAwMDAgKzAyMDAKKysr IG1wM3NwbHQvZGlzdGluZm8JMjAxMi0wNC0xMSAwOTo1NDoxMi4wMDAwMDAwMDAgKzAyMDAKQEAg LTEsMiArMSwyIEBACi1TSEEyNTYgKG1wM3NwbHQtMi40LnRhci5neikgPSBiYmQ1OTMyZGE4MmRj NGJmMDIwNTJmOGFkMTQ4ODg0MTRkNTcwNTZmMGYyZjU2YTllNTc5OWM0MGUwM2FhMWE4Ci1TSVpF IChtcDNzcGx0LTIuNC50YXIuZ3opID0gMjMyMTcwCitTSEEyNTYgKG1wM3NwbHQtMi40LjEudGFy Lmd6KSA9IGU2MjViZjdkM2YxMWQ2OTU3Mjc5NGE4YjllODU3MjljNWMwYjk5YWQ1MmY1ZGJjNGVh ZmRlYTQ2NDQ0MDBkNmUKK1NJWkUgKG1wM3NwbHQtMi40LjEudGFyLmd6KSA9IDIzNjEwMwo= --0015174c169e49aaa004bd62a7a4-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 11 08:19:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839581065673 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:19:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john.marshall@riverwillow.com.au) Received: from mail1.riverwillow.net.au (mail1.riverwillow.net.au [203.58.93.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5078FC19 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.25.24.200] (rwpc13.mby.riverwillow.net.au [172.25.24.200]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail1.riverwillow.net.au (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3B840BV016966 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:04:06 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=riverwillow.com.au; s=m1001; t=1334131446; bh=zjtkl7u9mse8akQFEjcSq6uU0xl5tKRzhzq3ixZqbaA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=c5AoWzMjUolNuru1KOiReqERik4vww+mJG5J5Atd1UunazOPSIXZURtNynjUbxMLS wANS0E53s23bwBh2pYh3Yv2gfIVmxXbR21SaAH0gCBSxL+Mv3KKe0nhlED2uAPP6JM e0u0/l1xEDq72dJkKHrlhFJI6MZRVBm3M/aon1Jg= Message-ID: <4F853AE5.6030708@riverwillow.com.au> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:03:49 +1000 From: John Marshall Organization: Riverwillow Pty Ltd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120322 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 OpenPGP: id=A29A84A2; url=http://pki.riverwillow.com.au/pgp/johnmarshall.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5198932A36A4E10A720CEC42" Subject: Re: Memory leak in xfce4-netload-plugin and xfce4-systemload-plugin - only on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:19:17 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5198932A36A4E10A720CEC42 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/04/2012 05:05, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > I see a memory leak (or something like that) in the ports > sysutils/xfce4-netload-plugin > sysutils/xfce4-systemload-plugin >=20 > The ports start out using less than 100M of memory (taken from the > SIZE column in top), but over a short time (about a week or two) grows > to almost 1000M. > An example is my workstation, which has been up for about three days n= ow: > tingo@kg-v2$ uname -a > FreeBSD kg-v2.kg4.no 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #5: Fri Apr > 6 21:35:20 CEST 2012 > root@kg-v2.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > tingo@kg-v2$ uptime > 8:49PM up 3 days, 22:19, 20 users, load averages: 0.12, 0.21, 0.23 > xfce4-netload-plugin is now at 670M and > xfce4-systemload-plugin is at 509M >=20 > Ports on the machine are updated: > root@kg-v2# pv | grep netload > xfce4-netload-plugin-1.1.0 =3D up-to-date with port > root@kg-v2# pv | grep systemload > xfce4-systemload-plugin-1.0.0_2 =3D up-to-date with port >=20 > Does anyone else see this? I reported it originally in the Forums[1] , > but didn't get any response. I have observed the same behaviour on 9.0-RELEASE i386 after several days= =2E > And how can I diagnose the problem further, so that I can provide a > better error report >=20 > References: > 1) http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3D28698 --=20 John Marshall --------------enig5198932A36A4E10A720CEC42 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+FOu8ACgkQw/tAaKKahKIs+ACgnmg8xgNWa3gHjmAIiTeZBc1l FUYAn2MXRMvx4P3iwhvgXzq/YX43Kqlo =uOXt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5198932A36A4E10A720CEC42-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 11 10:39:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD70106566B; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:39:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from citrin@citrin.ru) Received: from mail-chaos.rambler.ru (mail-chaos.rambler.ru [81.19.68.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7E78FC0C; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:39:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from citrin.office.vega.ru (office-nat.spylog.net [193.169.234.6]) (Authenticated sender: citrin@citrin.ru) by mail-chaos.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16F6917036; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:39:57 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <4F855F7C.1090306@citrin.ru> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:39:56 +0400 From: Anton Yuzhaninov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110922 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: spil.oss@gmail.com References: <201204102321.q3ANLVph019715@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, miwi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/160821: audio/libmp3splt: Building WITHOUT_ID3 fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:39:59 -0000 On 04/11/12 12:01, Spil Oss wrote: > Please find patches for libmp3splt and mp3splt attached. > libmp3splt from 0.7_1 to 0.7.1 and mp3splt 2.4 to 2.4.1 as per > upstreamhttp://mp3splt.sourceforge.net/mp3splt_page/downloads.php > > Tested build with clang > Tested libmp3splt WITH_ID3 and WITHOUT_ID3 both working There is minor issues with suggested patches. libmp3splt: PORTREVISION= 0 should not be added to Makefile mp3splt: distfile location on SF mirrors has been changed. Makefile should be updated. corrected patches: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8798217/tmp/libmp3splt-0.7.1.patch http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8798217/tmp/mp3splt-2.4.1.patch -- Anton Yuzhaninov From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 11 11:29:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF8D106566C; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:29:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ws@au.dyndns.ws) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:2:7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F698FC0A; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:29:45 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjAFALFqhU+WZWdv/2dsb2JhbABFgxyzJ4QKggkBAQV5EAsOCi5XBoggun+RPwSIWJMGikSCdw Received: from ppp103-111.static.internode.on.net (HELO lillith-iv.ovirt.dyndns.ws) ([150.101.103.111]) by ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2012 20:59:43 +0930 X-Envelope-From: ws@au.dyndns.ws X-Envelope-To: freebsd@byshenk.net Received: from [172.17.17.134] (ws@[172.17.17.134]) by lillith-iv.ovirt.dyndns.ws (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3BBTV4l082615; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:59:31 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from ws@au.dyndns.ws) From: Wayne Sierke To: Julien Laffaye In-Reply-To: <4F852DA1.4020900@freebsd.org> References: <20120410195541.GA62066@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120410204737.GA1737@portland1.byshenk.net> <1334124961.1385.7.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> <4F852DA1.4020900@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ASCII" Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:59:30 +0930 Message-ID: <1334143770.1385.13.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 172.17.17.142 X-Scanned-By: SpamAssassin 3.003002(2011-06-06) X-Scanned-By: ClamAV X-Spam-Score: -2.9 () ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 Cc: Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Greg Byshenk Subject: Re: pkg version -Xs foo shows all ports, not just foo X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:29:46 -0000 On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 09:07 +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote: > On 4/11/2012 8:16 AM, Wayne Sierke wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 13:47 -0700, Greg Byshenk wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:55:41PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >>> BUZI> pkg version -Xs Image > >>> CalculiX-2.4 = > >>> GraphicsMagick-1.1.15_3,1 = > >>> ImageMagick-6.7.5.10 = > >>> ORBit2-2.14.19 = > >>> OpenEXR-1.6.1_3 = > >>> R-2.14.2 = > >>> ^C > >>> BUZI> > >>> > >>> The man page seems to indicate that the > >>> above options should only show ImageMagick. > >>> > >>> What am I doing wrong? > > Is it a transcription error or are you really using a command named > > "pkg" rather than pkg_version(1)? > I think he is using pkgng. Ah, ok. I hadn't looked at pkgng yet. Looks like those options aren't implemented yet: mika# pwd ; grep -En -C1 "VERSION_STRING|VERSION_EREGEX" ./pkg/version.c /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg/work/pkg-1.0-beta10 208- case 'X': 209: opt |= VERSION_EREGEX; 210- break; 211- case 's': 212: opt |= VERSION_STRING; 213- break; mika# grep -Ewr "VERSION_STRING|VERSION_EREGEX" . ./pkg/pkgcli.h:#define VERSION_EREGEX (1<<6) ./pkg/pkgcli.h:#define VERSION_STRING (1<<7) ./pkg/version.c: opt |= VERSION_EREGEX; ./pkg/version.c: opt |= VERSION_STRING; mika# From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 11 12:48:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00518106564A; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:48:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A688F8FC0A; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:48:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwxj-00051K-Cq; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:48:01 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwx6-0003yq-BR; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:47:14 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3BCkxRS041464; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:46:59 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q3BCkx0S041463; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:46:59 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bris.ac.uk using -f Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:46:59 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Wayne Sierke Message-ID: <20120411124659.GA41440@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20120410195541.GA62066@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120410204737.GA1737@portland1.byshenk.net> <1334124961.1385.7.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> <4F852DA1.4020900@freebsd.org> <1334143770.1385.13.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1334143770.1385.13.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Greg Byshenk , Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Julien Laffaye Subject: Re: pkg version -Xs foo shows all ports, not just foo X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:48:11 -0000 On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 08:59:30PM +0930, Wayne Sierke wrote: > On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 09:07 +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote: > > On 4/11/2012 8:16 AM, Wayne Sierke wrote: > > > On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 13:47 -0700, Greg Byshenk wrote: > > >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:55:41PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > >>> BUZI> pkg version -Xs Image > > >>> CalculiX-2.4 = > > >>> GraphicsMagick-1.1.15_3,1 = > > >>> ImageMagick-6.7.5.10 = > > >>> ORBit2-2.14.19 = > > >>> OpenEXR-1.6.1_3 = > > >>> R-2.14.2 = > > >>> ^C > > >>> BUZI> > > >>> > > >>> The man page seems to indicate that the > > >>> above options should only show ImageMagick. > > >>> > > >>> What am I doing wrong? > > > Is it a transcription error or are you really using a command named > > > "pkg" rather than pkg_version(1)? > > I think he is using pkgng. > > Ah, ok. I hadn't looked at pkgng yet. > > Looks like those options aren't implemented yet: yes, no problem. I just wanted to ask in case I was doing something wrong. By the way, many thanks to the whole pkgng team for their work! -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 11 14:14:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89532106566B; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:14:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681858FC1C; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3BEE2w9093705; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:14:02 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q3BEE2cD093704; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:14:02 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:13:58 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Wayne Sierke Message-ID: <20120411141358.GA2401@azathoth.lan> References: <20120410195541.GA62066@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120410204737.GA1737@portland1.byshenk.net> <1334124961.1385.7.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> <4F852DA1.4020900@freebsd.org> <1334143770.1385.13.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1334143770.1385.13.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Greg Byshenk , Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Julien Laffaye Subject: Re: pkg version -Xs foo shows all ports, not just foo X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:14:02 -0000 --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 08:59:30PM +0930, Wayne Sierke wrote: > On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 09:07 +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote: > > On 4/11/2012 8:16 AM, Wayne Sierke wrote: > > > On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 13:47 -0700, Greg Byshenk wrote: > > >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:55:41PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > >>> BUZI> pkg version -Xs Image > > >>> CalculiX-2.4 =3D > > >>> GraphicsMagick-1.1.15_3,1 =3D > > >>> ImageMagick-6.7.5.10 =3D > > >>> ORBit2-2.14.19 =3D > > >>> OpenEXR-1.6.1_3 =3D > > >>> R-2.14.2 =3D > > >>> ^C > > >>> BUZI> > > >>> > > >>> The man page seems to indicate that the > > >>> above options should only show ImageMagick. > > >>> > > >>> What am I doing wrong? > > > Is it a transcription error or are you really using a command named > > > "pkg" rather than pkg_version(1)? > > I think he is using pkgng. >=20 > Ah, ok. I hadn't looked at pkgng yet. >=20 > Looks like those options aren't implemented yet: >=20 > mika# pwd ; grep -En -C1 "VERSION_STRING|VERSION_EREGEX" ./pkg/version.c > /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg/work/pkg-1.0-beta10 > 208- case 'X': > 209: opt |=3D VERSION_EREGEX; > 210- break; > 211- case 's': > 212: opt |=3D VERSION_STRING; > 213- break; > mika# grep -Ewr "VERSION_STRING|VERSION_EREGEX" . > ./pkg/pkgcli.h:#define VERSION_EREGEX (1<<6) > ./pkg/pkgcli.h:#define VERSION_STRING (1<<7) > ./pkg/version.c: opt |=3D VERSION_EREGEX; > ./pkg/version.c: opt |=3D VERSION_STRING; > mika#=20 >=20 >=20 implemented now:=20 https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/commit/faac85fec181eafc539c8d5473c045a4e34eb= fcf in what I think is a better way (without s and with more option): pkg version -X foo =3D Extended regular expression=20 pkg version -x foo =3D regular expression pkg version -g foo =3D glob pkg version -e foo =3D exact match regards, Bapt --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+FkaYACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EziSQCdGMFanzQy08iepyi59woZfI69 qh4An3zDBHNLyg1oZClO7Cdmr69/4UrI =ewLq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 02:02:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486011065676 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 02:02:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryan@shatow.net) Received: from secure.xzibition.com (secure.xzibition.com [173.160.118.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90788FC0C for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 02:02:32 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=shatow.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:content-type; q=dns; s= sweb; b=sL/TLD4fogw24rTW3jmNmJ+bS/vMO937AEfyH9bu56PaAjPQtNO9Nqsk YmBnR68F9vt9gmFhiW//i5Kr2aSNp5w74u6SnY2piWJDH+pAdHdXerWIX1koNczo q2CdTm9lEMpnhQmZPjWXBAqqY/JaUHA+biD5Kic6gVLssfghqIQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=shatow.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:content-type; s=sweb; bh=S Z0n4T/otdnIe8ouySROkSmlLwf0mfEpkeYoQV3abvQ=; b=zvrjYgdAdAyrIo1ef JEdL7W4dktY7Ck2eHKnBS8nZWyCZ8DtP/X165vG+7UF/RcvzZtGg2PmfwBo8j5Gs C+JfD2ppo4Elff2hjopgwtWPPk1/5WVOG5tiThBUKW7OByDrz+FdHilCoMYp/ULl Z4hNx7of0L1Dsj3x2kNm71zCc8= Received: (qmail 35612 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2012 20:55:49 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.1.87?) (bryan@shatow.net@10.10.1.87) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 11 Apr 2012 20:55:49 -0500 Message-ID: <4F863615.80203@shatow.net> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:55:33 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgollucci@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 OpenPGP: id=3C9B0CF9; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig28D226A66269D28C2DCC98B0" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: bapt@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: ports-mgmt/portupgrade - Deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 02:02:33 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig28D226A66269D28C2DCC98B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Phillip, Your last commit on portupgrade [1] indicates to consider portmaster instead. What are the thoughts on this? Just the lack of a maintainer? I was considering writing/submitting a patch to support pkgng with portupgrade. 1. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=3D719045+0+/usr/local/www/db/= text/2012/cvs-ports/20120226.cvs-ports Thanks, Bryan Drewery --------------enig28D226A66269D28C2DCC98B0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPhjYbAAoJEG54KsA8mwz5gyUP/AiIEw8Mp7o4Q1q50go5shnt 7cYc4tdESny5U2Gedx+r6E0BxxqpE9t36wgLBbsyzO6M5c+V0AO3X3Xvb2omcTtV j4nqQqqXrMOGLFy8Jeaj8j4nCwYyCN/RG53ZthXUW//VKlbHp2dHd8NC2xUP7OAk tP8HwfmJv1R52ikdmyARKmM78PVlYdMIYwTtoqrQGHDS2Bg/ITwflwaVGF1zfsbr 5FksIQ3IeTmgEgy+dMv1pvc/LpiZJUw8HAQ286NZx0NP2WJUyBoN/YGsoXVOMMTj CmRy4wTu9vRqOgxNy7r4IOhjLJDDWOsmQ3G6cjwSx3bYczkudvsM8LbLCI9AkroN 4OabueCwhy1UqWVlm9hghWBA2RyOKJ2jdo1qT6fBP6n1B9vAvlumEtuIYvNo73cn uVY4V+f+vw53vJTL9NI2l2A9zBEbZR0srlRn6iwf5F1T+rjEOhQ+loHzGgwwEgCR HXDUo+pXDPaCnuIRUII62rI5d8I3N9rU8WPpovskLmqxlpMMNb6T3cpKKhuBUHfC IntSUM7B0y5pKzAtvFzaIUUzBtZLjNJ27Wd9F6zA27Hmg7HjFhVRbrskxFCkr3Ai uRC96HswN52EDWqkKbSjSMLtfeFOwsWxJq4wORjdlBAozuAe1adGWGXmEk6zQajm 7SWKC2ToW12g0axqkr0V =P8lO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig28D226A66269D28C2DCC98B0-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 03:40:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51AC9106566C for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 03:40:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D055E8FC08 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 03:40:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds12 with SMTP id ds12so1542660wgb.31 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:40:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=XqTvEaCdbcPYHg3qPeqIQkl01Br7H9c70zwE2rebXks=; b=eNTpBXBducDkekTH6GzQxxrGp9bqR/ycUW1XM0w5cJi4hWZipvQM+q6KCDkDyQcCLI t6dgSbZtSfWclCasaRLWkTuwzs1QcyKfVwBKesKnxwTxYO8MxJLXEAPn2PxSFsRI3TQe ZpHQzNOOr/pdrjP+g0+m5ad+fwyB4oc2eCKJk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=XqTvEaCdbcPYHg3qPeqIQkl01Br7H9c70zwE2rebXks=; b=Hkzaa9K2gbV8XOwLv3Tl8+w6+E4n6+gyqzpVWWAaTZD5qSixv4ktZmXoQBEn/PlWUO yfUHQpIqpjveHHwE3e4U+Ru34Yb7B5DQVOvdHkACzgnjA/P4n+vYpZlo7dlgAPT9JOIU M1bi0uwPGFFUNAGJLrqXJ0PyvGeKMh/9sSpPPybzkoc6zMHDyGiJCkXzK7i3Z5nmz7An g04STgu7Wb5WrL830b8b8OBWMY3MVnYYHxPdwsXCPzJVsmBIkDge1kI7gxgOBDCK1BoU M8IEdaRe+E9bwm7l7pxxIIGMeJ8XPmy7TLJwASQC5x5TQVgsgg9ToONMtlbpHT7/PQbg +dBQ== Received: by 10.180.92.71 with SMTP id ck7mr2053143wib.2.1334202004461; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:40:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.63.4 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:39:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F863615.80203@shatow.net> References: <4F863615.80203@shatow.net> From: Eitan Adler Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:39:34 -0400 Message-ID: To: Bryan Drewery Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkRiwbbHKCQIrilas3AjPu8ENwyY0YtHYGkgQhcZDtLCaAMV2QCUFxSZa3BHrG5xeLy/xSQ Cc: pgollucci@freebsd.org, bapt@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade - Deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 03:40:13 -0000 On 11 April 2012 21:55, Bryan Drewery wrote: > Hi Phillip, > > Your last commit on portupgrade [1] indicates to consider portmaster > instead. What are the thoughts on this? Just the lack of a maintainer? Open PRs that indicate long lasting bugs with no upstream maintainer. If you would like to pick up development of portupgrade please go ahead! > I was considering writing/submitting a patch to support pkgng with > portupgrade. There are many that would be thankful. If you wish to become the upstream maintainer and release new versions, fix bugs, deal with existing PRs please do so. I'll be happy to commit the new version. -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 03:41:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78531065674; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 03:41:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f42.google.com (mail-qa0-f42.google.com [209.85.216.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E308FC14; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 03:41:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qafi31 with SMTP id i31so4140359qaf.15 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:41:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=syZwg1Bo7HsRGy47oeFGDmDUjnWQlqbXmhaeNOLIDuE=; b=FloGdZEuqcRNU8wLE5cRm27WOe+IRsh6jVBrTAbv0nRBdUvEfGMQoqLYiuGqcK28FB lleRfZHZZBDfZQs9dsi8NEYzygQTOR5JbgMB+Zyr2yvOU9TcWL+qbYgu0ECD4rxuRDgy pJQJ+zeKevTwIWieTzBXXR/VjUeJB4lfrBDNpJ3lPKaYoQ3HvkFKqcFmna83h9+c/68P OsNghRBCRrxVKVvtRZ7lOTZBU4IuuE54ezzpq6vtAsXDjoBm5bm7QZ7Odr/gPATSNKrh vRZyGbhit+miGkRqOzpCtQSYS59+YrVpNvWEI2uo8GnwX+7WN2dCj3lItKYfbOyWHeXS Q9gQ== Received: by 10.224.109.65 with SMTP id i1mr1890859qap.39.1334202098154; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:41:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from philip.hq.rws (wsip-174-79-184-239.dc.dc.cox.net. [174.79.184.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m6sm9524996qah.2.2012.04.11.20.41.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:41:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F864EEE.4010508@p6m7g8.com> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 03:41:34 +0000 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6M7G8 Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111029 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eitan Adler References: <4F863615.80203@shatow.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD336B6171BAFCAD909B1FCAA" Cc: pgollucci@freebsd.org, bapt@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Bryan Drewery Subject: Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade - Deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 03:41:45 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD336B6171BAFCAD909B1FCAA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/12/12 03:39, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 11 April 2012 21:55, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> Hi Phillip, >> >> Your last commit on portupgrade [1] indicates to consider portmaster >> instead. What are the thoughts on this? Just the lack of a maintainer?= >=20 > Open PRs that indicate long lasting bugs with no upstream maintainer. > If you would like to pick up development of portupgrade please go > ahead! >=20 >> I was considering writing/submitting a patch to support pkgng with >> portupgrade. >=20 > There are many that would be thankful. If you wish to become the > upstream maintainer and release new versions, fix bugs, deal with > existing PRs please do so. I'll be happy to commit the new version. >=20 I'd say with Eitan said, but the architecture and dependencies of portupgrade make this a daunting task to say the least; however, feel free to try. --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Director Operations, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. --------------enigD336B6171BAFCAD909B1FCAA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFPhk7wdbiP+9ubjBwRAoeVAJ99maS7nAFgbJOUmd04ck0nvTCdCACfQSxc 4Wiabh7DfUZKH6scOlaCUOM= =T0A4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD336B6171BAFCAD909B1FCAA-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 08:21:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC681065674 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:21:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from andxor.it (relay.andxor.it [195.223.2.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D1E28FC19 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76833 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2012 08:15:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO alex.andxor.it) (192.168.2.30) by andxor.it with SMTP; 12 Apr 2012 08:15:03 -0000 Message-ID: <4F868F07.8010501@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:15:03 +0200 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120315 Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <20120409220442.GE90364@azathoth.lan> <201204100350.q3A3o8SN005881@slippy.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: Time to kill php4, who stands up to save it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:21:46 -0000 Chris Rees ha scritto: >> On a tangential issue, php52 should probably be kept around, at least for >> now. > > The PHP maintainer disagreed on this point last week-ish. Eh?! I never said it. It' fine to keep a maintained (not by me) php52, since php5 will be updated to 5.4 branch. -- Alex Dupre From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 08:23:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6DA106566C; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:23:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911628FC0A; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so1768009bkc.13 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 01:23:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=gx038wKK3q1Yj8saUwhYiu73ZXBrv1IuWUJXau6ZHFs=; b=ns4y+JJKDqtTEthJukRksJSHlOOk54ktDVNneco+X+AsrC8FDef203eoTo4a2kUfZb z6AbZAYTuLBFkAVgqtxDWSw4mLreH3dO1B+hDqT4AQ2ydvU38+pAm9zq/21kPUXTGj6f 0UPtqUly1rcs0MeMCu9/FousSm/jeKHWheVIuoVEbNhsKnZ5OqY69CETfXpg0ceEefXp o/bpvVJyUGsuzLJO+wuG8eqfgZmmvkPHDgYv4qDJyFxwm7rB2qbA1G4pwy5uhGn7t7D8 XDLvKONhA53AoDFLjhmGpfOWaaggVzET0FYOV4yQebjvdXg9dFJfi7R4QTrqs5hG24f3 rB6g== Received: by 10.204.128.65 with SMTP id j1mr456309bks.74.1334219031526; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 01:23:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 01:23:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F868F07.8010501@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120409220442.GE90364@azathoth.lan> <201204100350.q3A3o8SN005881@slippy.cwsent.com> <4F868F07.8010501@FreeBSD.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:23:21 +0000 Message-ID: To: Alex Dupre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: Time to kill php4, who stands up to save it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:23:58 -0000 On 12 April 2012 08:15, Alex Dupre wrote: > Chris Rees ha scritto: >>> On a tangential issue, php52 should probably be kept around, at least for >>> now. >> >> The PHP maintainer disagreed on this point last week-ish. > > Eh?! I never said it. It' fine to keep a maintained (not by me) php52, > since php5 will be updated to 5.4 branch. Oops, that's what you said, sorry. I had hastily jumped to the conclusion that no-one else would be crazy enough to want to maintain it either, but we could be surprised ;) Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 08:25:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126E01065676 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:25:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spil.oss@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96CBD8FC1F for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaaf13 with SMTP id f13so460423eaa.13 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 01:25:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OxlmkbdNiybHSXC7fY6Uyc/LgpHYX1Nw2I4abfZLiCY=; b=X8bklCGRrHGYj1hUs/QV0A1lpMEUVvMYgULr4q79BhZnp8DtM74nfZ4FzQJtzM5QY1 CjLByAQm2+lqoWZ16UU15Sgk47SuY3esGwjGjbAbR5y2NjfEi0Woc/yBHLo0j+FCG+lG 3QkgXTvpsIX04//9EHvmA0kA07dwbdXjftUXgnmd8S4TfvVPeH0KKZgG7Uj/kKZPdKcP PwDgrTqQjFERPqFedP+Jr1ht/KbZKjg26yKTDvCgxwAelzK5G3+d/kJMrjlJLLuUoCNl 5Di8wc61dxm5BpEhLD/v034WaLHPBQkMCfBSGpMfxd1eXpejMTE15RFeH1TzEd9Gn/bn FOqA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.15.143 with SMTP id k15mr121787eba.251.1334219121834; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 01:25:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.22.148 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 01:25:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F855F7C.1090306@citrin.ru> References: <201204102321.q3ANLVph019715@freefall.freebsd.org> <4F855F7C.1090306@citrin.ru> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:25:21 +0200 Message-ID: From: Spil Oss To: Anton Yuzhaninov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/160821: audio/libmp3splt: Building WITHOUT_ID3 fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: spil.oss@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:25:29 -0000 On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote= : > On 04/11/12 12:01, Spil Oss wrote: >> >> Please find patches for libmp3splt and mp3splt attached. >> libmp3splt from 0.7_1 to 0.7.1 and mp3splt 2.4 to 2.4.1 as per >> upstreamhttp://mp3splt.sourceforge.net/mp3splt_page/downloads.php >> >> >> Tested build with clang >> Tested libmp3splt WITH_ID3 and WITHOUT_ID3 both working > > > There is minor issues with suggested patches. > > libmp3splt: > PORTREVISION=3D =A00 > should not be added to Makefile > > mp3splt: > distfile location on SF mirrors has been changed. Makefile should be > updated. > > corrected patches: > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8798217/tmp/libmp3splt-0.7.1.patch > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8798217/tmp/mp3splt-2.4.1.patch > > -- > =A0Anton Yuzhaninov Hi Anton, Will you be submitting the patches to ports? I could create a new PR for it if you wish... Kind regards, Spil. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 09:15:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5003106564A for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:15:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from april.london.02.net (april.london.02.net [87.194.255.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599F88FC16 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:15:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muji2.config (87.194.237.233) by april.london.02.net (8.5.140) id 4F728CFB00627349 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:13:54 +0100 Message-ID: <4F869CD2.2040702@onetel.com> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:13:54 +0100 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100924 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org References: <4F863615.80203@shatow.net> <4F864EEE.4010508@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <4F864EEE.4010508@p6m7g8.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade - Deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:15:27 -0000 On 12/04/2012 04:41, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > On 04/12/12 03:39, Eitan Adler wrote: >> On 11 April 2012 21:55, Bryan Drewery wrote: >>> Hi Phillip, >>> >>> Your last commit on portupgrade [1] indicates to consider portmaster >>> instead. What are the thoughts on this? Just the lack of a maintainer? >> >> Open PRs that indicate long lasting bugs with no upstream maintainer. >> If you would like to pick up development of portupgrade please go >> ahead! >> >>> I was considering writing/submitting a patch to support pkgng with >>> portupgrade. >> >> There are many that would be thankful. If you wish to become the >> upstream maintainer and release new versions, fix bugs, deal with >> existing PRs please do so. I'll be happy to commit the new version. >> > > I'd say with Eitan said, but the architecture and dependencies of > portupgrade make this a daunting task to say the least; however, feel > free to try. > Hi I'm only a lurker and lowly user but could I humbly request that portmanager is brought back into use? It's simple to use and does what it does extremely well and without fuss. I think the fact that it still "just works" after all this time is a mark of it's worth. thanks Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 09:57:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F86106566C for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:57:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB79A8FC08 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:57:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so1857631bkc.13 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 02:57:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fkQyfbTuHHTmtNi/5Ikv0XXrbZBjjqg/4qTUl9YwBA0=; b=S/DT0J7Q3OzsifUFhA1oY8+gsa54ZIXys8d99fxosrRyH3WLf1LoMyqbVmhaIM8njm 4Mh7YZ5VY7RRouWOfcoBW1n7XfxiWJ7kCNQNO9Sj7+Z+XMNNAy40Hcm6QlDiTNHnKHaM w0V2Dx7idiS5D8ascAm1Xo3g+dRDbYawSpqVKNCve60zUb0tcBeehyA4pabMXTgjsDau MlIzZBIQQO4qt7cs1A9teZWGtBRUPn2NI1bcUYM2PYCSFdhO8HRuEm4OD51yUDLyfw+j IFmWetBUoE3Og8Z4yzZdNfCv/iMRuGB6ZXvXi6bW8ToSSKfL/0kBxcOLYX2frHj4RJEA tRwg== Received: by 10.205.130.133 with SMTP id hm5mr502049bkc.115.1334224672883; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 02:57:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 02:57:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F869CD2.2040702@onetel.com> References: <4F863615.80203@shatow.net> <4F864EEE.4010508@p6m7g8.com> <4F869CD2.2040702@onetel.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:57:22 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 63-hiK_ba4wvfGwryCPrpMr1tss Message-ID: To: Chris Whitehouse Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade - Deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:57:54 -0000 On 12 April 2012 09:13, Chris Whitehouse wrote: > On 12/04/2012 04:41, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >> >> On 04/12/12 03:39, Eitan Adler wrote: >>> >>> On 11 April 2012 21:55, Bryan Drewery =A0wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Phillip, >>>> >>>> Your last commit on portupgrade [1] indicates to consider portmaster >>>> instead. What are the thoughts on this? Just the lack of a maintainer? >>> >>> >>> Open PRs that indicate long lasting bugs with no upstream maintainer. >>> If you would like to pick up development of portupgrade please go >>> ahead! >>> >>>> I was considering writing/submitting a patch to support pkgng with >>>> portupgrade. >>> >>> >>> There are many that would be thankful. If you wish to become the >>> upstream maintainer and release new versions, fix bugs, deal with >>> existing PRs please do so. I'll be happy to commit the new version. >>> >> >> I'd say with Eitan said, but the architecture and dependencies of >> portupgrade make this a daunting task to say the least; however, feel >> free to try. >> > > Hi > > I'm only a lurker and lowly user but could I humbly request that portmana= ger > is brought back into use? It's simple to use and does what it does extrem= ely > well and without fuss. I think the fact that it still "just works" after = all > this time is a mark of it's worth. Unfortunately, many of us do not find that it 'just works'. There is no-one to ask for support, so people resort to asking ports@ or in IRC. It is also unmaintained, and has many bugs against it: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?text=3Dportupgrade Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 10:03:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6543D1065710; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:03:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B938D8FC1A; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3CA3g2h015207 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:03:42 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.1 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q3CA3g2h015207 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q3CA3g2h015207; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none Message-ID: <4F86A87D.7030309@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:03:41 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4F863615.80203@shatow.net> <4F864EEE.4010508@p6m7g8.com> <4F869CD2.2040702@onetel.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig750BE61CA8D66842959B11F2" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Chris Whitehouse Subject: Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade - Deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:03:46 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig750BE61CA8D66842959B11F2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/04/2012 10:57, Chris Rees wrote: >> I'm only a lurker and lowly user but could I humbly request that portm= anager >> > is brought back into use? It's simple to use and does what it does e= xtremely >> > well and without fuss. I think the fact that it still "just works" a= fter all >> > this time is a mark of it's worth. > Unfortunately, many of us do not find that it 'just works'. There is > no-one to ask for support, so people resort to asking ports@ or in > IRC. >=20 > It is also unmaintained, and has many bugs against it: >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?text=3Dportupgrade He said *portmanager* There aren't any open PRs against portmanager and it has a maintainer. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig750BE61CA8D66842959B11F2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+GqH4ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyd8wCggucVHMK038AfnLbzsBpvOxs7 VosAmwTqMOk6S09LQlDGrI3CpJnsK65X =eqn8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig750BE61CA8D66842959B11F2-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 10:09:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C596106566B; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:09:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36CB8FC08; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so1869711bkc.13 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 03:09:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bWle2yyco6FXwg10O0V6B2qbb5PuUWFGT6Zjp7kXLqI=; b=NXeOAHZDjT6RTpDu2p4grKsMWsCCcOLFTz3Ih74P1XLRqiAsIFOtx4+B0qSka3IL7L DPPID+MtRNapCzZAwWWhjVu17YEQRncUKKu79SMkn1g8hzEwJPYyYK5s0hvpovXfOhzr 7utdjUZMICcPoiWc8WeJ/Lm5fiwmEhYVyTAfdpzR0/h5gWZXohVzs8kSdIcRz9Dc4MNE XBxKDVRM6cynQtvtXblglT/stoQQReEOdie5EdyC1zxzPkUXTw3U9rwxCjX0JAAMJs+m HsEFs61ETlvQ9ghQahSB4X7g1ERw4nh12VMCzH79u+zb7f48M9F8ELAKBhkBjTKrB7cT 60rg== Received: by 10.204.128.65 with SMTP id j1mr557223bks.74.1334225397721; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 03:09:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 03:09:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F86A87D.7030309@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F863615.80203@shatow.net> <4F864EEE.4010508@p6m7g8.com> <4F869CD2.2040702@onetel.com> <4F86A87D.7030309@FreeBSD.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:09:27 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Gs3ZOXLijS252tTY5Z_D3nycago Message-ID: To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Chris Whitehouse Subject: Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade - Deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:09:59 -0000 On 12 April 2012 10:03, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 12/04/2012 10:57, Chris Rees wrote: >>> I'm only a lurker and lowly user but could I humbly request that portma= nager >>> > is brought back into use? It's simple to use and does what it does ex= tremely >>> > well and without fuss. I think the fact that it still "just works" af= ter all >>> > this time is a mark of it's worth. > >> Unfortunately, many of us do not find that it 'just works'. =A0There is >> no-one to ask for support, so people resort to asking ports@ or in >> IRC. >> >> It is also unmaintained, and has many bugs against it: >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?text=3Dportupgrade > > > He said *portmanager* =A0There aren't any open PRs against portmanager an= d > it has a maintainer. Ouch, sorry -- got confused with the plethora of portupgrade threads I'm in at the moment :/ Chris, I did misread your email-- portmanager appears absolutely fine, and is in no danger of removal :) Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 11:23:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6A81065688 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:23:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@heesakkers.info) Received: from server4.ohos.nl (server4.ohos.nl [IPv6:2a00:d880:0:6::c951:214d]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BAB8FC0C for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:23:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [78.40.193.205] (helo=huis.heesakkers.info) by server4.ohos.nl with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SII7y-0000Zx-S5 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:23:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:23:50 +0200 From: Oliver Heesakkers To: Message-ID: X-Sender: freebsd@heesakkers.info User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8-beta Subject: security/openssl so bump w/o mention in UPDATING X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:23:54 -0000 security/openssl was brought up to 1.0.1 recently which includes bumping OPENSSL_SHLIBVER from 7 to 8. Which means, that in order not to break surprisingly many ports on my desktop I have to "portmaster -r" this port. "portmaster -w" might have also done the trick and I'll leave mentions of other ports-mgmt tools to whomever who will commit this to UPDATING as I believe should happen. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 11:29:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BA7106566C; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:29:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas.edel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85D78FC1B; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:29:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghrr20 with SMTP id r20so1176794ghr.13 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 04:29:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Y4QK2SdshXkxCFgvMWQ+mV76WiCNUEXu516oiYUtpts=; b=hvQMLlOXu5KA8u8w6NwcshavOUk0dK113XzJTzK2Xi46Y7/VhOYXgSxZfWcibh+ayy G45+bgk60lsWxRNS8WQ+d9Mf8KbUrFdxaoWMoIdbiil9gqKYVokPWDTV3xxC6NkxsBWs w1ic4tcSHY2gwITc9rZU91YUN+3yBfkqBl86sdbvvdu08rL4zyeOkaQpv7E/ANGt/gGS 5yTdctThZcKWY//GPNfjwoWo+9+RSczBqGbIIPSah+ldV/gx05gAgPicfvtLWe2zsGOb Om7wk7yJHUA0GqJmfRzXo1PQYd7OeFYd0F57glPKilMAX4W7AOaQZkP2GxjbPt1Wl7mF HiPA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.166.4 with SMTP id t4mr529935ano.17.1334230188565; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 04:29:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.56.21 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 04:29:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:29:48 +0200 Message-ID: From: Nicolas Edel To: bf@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: sbcl-1.0.55.0,1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:29:50 -0000 Hi, Just to let you know I did a portupdate on my FreeBSD 9.0 machine and then updated the sbcl port (sbcl-1.0.55.0,1); it fails building if config set the pdf documentation option. Cheers, :Nicolas From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 14:10:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 785E6106566C for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:10:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryan@shatow.net) Received: from secure.xzibition.com (secure.xzibition.com [173.160.118.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ACF58FC1C for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:10:58 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=shatow.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sweb; b=MrfJ/i l02YvePP6E2y4K2jDFZnF4AtfaAXH6gbBLfaXLJmloKTicM/W51QeTqB49y9Ipkd vVhdqbDfOq0Tit6UFFUDlC5HRnu9zr9Hqk2maVwCVM3uCZwqB3OIPRn6esK8dK65 4CM30x9Fi+gxHdHRi9aBU9bbcitCwIVIl5Quk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=shatow.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sweb; bh=1iTTOFQPuXD3 TVPyQChf1721QZyzF9owIcdyb1frQ5E=; b=3V/CccYICR9i3NVZsiOluHwhUUBT CZrxvtghsbNJDVhFCeKL9c61mI4R/jjn7DbZTy00MU1/po/Km2EuC3M6T0LokWWC XzK1NTw8mSKEJeeN9/eewnT52mT4/m2utiZ65pfqDK0ASu0hw9KBosrJQsc6mjpi rLwIngyQ3hCUp2s= Received: (qmail 72319 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2012 09:10:55 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.107?) (bryan@shatow.net@74.94.87.209) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 12 Apr 2012 09:10:55 -0500 Message-ID: <4F86E26D.2050009@shatow.net> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:10:53 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4F863615.80203@shatow.net> <4F864EEE.4010508@p6m7g8.com> <4F869CD2.2040702@onetel.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, lists@eitanadler.com, pgollucci@gmail.com, Chris Whitehouse Subject: Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade - Deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:10:58 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/12/2012 04:57 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > Unfortunately, many of us do not find that it 'just works'. There > is no-one to ask for support, so people resort to asking ports@ or > in IRC. > > It is also unmaintained, and has many bugs against it: I am going to attempt to take over the upstream and maintainership. I use it quite a bit and don't want to see it go away. Thanks, Bryan Drewery -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPhuJoAAoJEG54KsA8mwz5IUYP/jR3gPaA7EK3jnWA2Nzm8j+e yAzds/oY2UsKJSs0Uk9Ogpbb64s5EIS44W+F9Y7DBuGxXXpnduzQ/42BChf1fy0/ S9Uxb8+wCbqpvVYZToTjWeZt1N/7yw+Us7WZlBGXQzvzzUkujNWjReqS3gbqwUai LbroSA3YMoRUkyA9taHr+9ONyOJzOdMXDcZG/FKCMZrXm6Jc80KEUNT7IwujfSN5 MrIIdpeof8UfyiRpyArfnHAXJ0b7ABo91la0iv5VcPp6xnS3M0TlUBXcygSo2N7U lq0VARHyiM68FosW2t7YMQXYbyvPjnF5AJthN+tvMcSM5SiSgoT46Gy35wPqkGs1 jJlrp6O+5opGSP5TmuSaMiqGjOLSILjtd5tELKylI+u5W9MOW2mmNx3BFEdhNdSr jL49q7pOogRRWmeyJ2ntBKZdatB0e5c9dR5adXqB9XDAqppGWT0Qm7qlLgCUsOB6 Jrp4iAcbso+AW2lHlWyhrtpfbN/duKHPVRobj3bN1EDDNi81ssYr8Hqdc6jxcL/j htF9vVyCfMawxKAXtszgPQghs65gFPWqXGuLmJ/HD+fM9uyRYwiKqDprm2p7o1Rr 9dPSrn5diUe3Jb0me1MW1W+nc3PVoxB1bU3jUlDxdC4B64yU/6fgDHYiPjaYjKIp 66MnUhu9tyFLhLgeOogA =OC2T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 15:08:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E04106566B; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:08:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D858FC16; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 8438D56205; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:08:08 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:08:08 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Cy Schubert Message-ID: <20120412150808.GB15996@lonesome.com> References: <20120409220442.GE90364@azathoth.lan> <201204100350.q3A3o8SN005881@slippy.cwsent.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201204100350.q3A3o8SN005881@slippy.cwsent.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: Time to kill php4, who stands up to save it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:08:08 -0000 On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:50:08PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: > On a tangential issue, php52 should probably be kept around, at least > for now. [...] I think these ports should be deprecated, giving > users ample time to migrate to newer ports AFAIK all the php52 ports are indeed already marked deprecated. If there any missing, let's fix that. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 15:30:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AFE7106564A for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:30:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@dataix.net) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D998FC0C for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so3827609iah.13 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:30:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dataix.net; s=rsa; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition; bh=z7pXpX2HGs/tdvMcKLQPYeUR95ln2joRU/BNbTiKO+Y=; b=cIXKln1Xk7dxg3e4NUECAzcg6Hdgeeeb54KsdowlIG6V3qJesH77BUEpecPnlTQfGw Fplc/qVHgs5CtE15J/J2IdzXsDSLmjh2pebgyYfoEs9tNmzBvELLvN49kD++e3BcVfej izc8q2lGvUHE9b99AYSVYoinqgsrwsfx11lCA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:x-gm-message-state; bh=z7pXpX2HGs/tdvMcKLQPYeUR95ln2joRU/BNbTiKO+Y=; b=lvi3c+xOo4fZ3D12aPljL3iAm6Xeju6i9+tPFD8QmrB1dnft42UoVRuUKAewubrjQt n3hjEd0l4XLorx+7R2ifo0FPCbLmhWv4YP2WNdZhWAzSJEApI3GjNSzkGUsODgDwhjzQ xVbO7K/ISutRr/Vv+CaJulJSeRnphCgCZpYNJ7Y1oif06HSFm0Dw7F+4cSR3r7EUmxoM LBKBqTLCfhvogOumUxzVL+TwrhzmJwJi8OTuCUDLdgA3qyy7NxtmZ8CWwWZ2ohnhmq8F OgdwRDC9N+zIAJKLLgNszQBBjoE28QDhWji1ONcmdlUC/m5xEsjMG8y5pmvSkGZjETpz E0xg== Received: by 10.50.89.168 with SMTP id bp8mr6647959igb.3.1334244635654; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (adsl-99-181-142-73.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net. [99.181.142.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ls3sm7471381igc.12.2012.04.12.08.30.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3CFUM2D048293 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:30:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Received: (from jhellenthal@localhost) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q3CFUM9v048292; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:30:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:30:22 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120412153021.GA23231@DataIX.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd" Content-Disposition: inline X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk5rbTOLuV8z6j/TkY6bPxQ/NFPsy6BTK90hyy8VmYppXT5b2nMtBB2l1V6KO9OM09ZUlWU Cc: lev@freebsd.org Subject: devel/subversion 1.7.4_1 & svnversion errors "E200030: sqlite: callback requested query abort" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:30:36 -0000 --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable After going through a few problem solving sessions with subversion and the errors it prints doing a svnversion on /usr/src/sys "E200030: sqlite: callback requested query abort" I came to the conclusion that either svnversion is broken in its path discovery or they are implying a new syntax on which svnversion should be used. newvers.sh calls svnversion on (.) while in /usr/src/sys which omits the error: E200030: sqlite: callback requested query abort. If svnversion is called on the root directory "/usr/src" there is no error so I believe either we need to adjust newvers.sh to work on (../) or create a patch for the current subversion to adjust svnversions path discovery. Keep in mind that I have already been through (svn cleanup) and other such methods of trying to fix this. Console# sqlite3 .svn/wc.db "pragma integrity_check"=20 ok Console# cd /usr/src/sys/ Console# svnversion=20 svn: E200030: sqlite: callback requested query abort svn: E200030: sqlite: callback requested query abort Console# svnversion ../ 234182M There have been reports that a checkout after the upgrade to the newer subversion and sqlite3 that it solves the problem but I have not verified that at all. Working changes are currently fairly busy. Thoughts ? Suggestions ? --=20 ;s =3D; --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPhvUNAAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+pGMH/1UFzjTb44jlVPbRgcd/VqEV SSXi1IZ50T0+QMuGOGcUYsusUDZLWXZzwW6QdW1vK9VygcF/ZBiYhwxvD/s7Myno 8IZYTQOCLtLx72RpTQ2oHGkn0z9Lp1/WPl40Ue8//+zYM3Siw5aOiRLJ5n59pOoR X8eE8cYFcx8LcmLdSHOQrKr5uCCTMG6mr6iT8LZNMS0EF9sbkf7Xfi8MnKLXUMVg 1U6qCVDYzzpXby0o3ztok0uPLXbfJ9Z+Lb7y0LIjRX8mHV71F/Db9DBkfpZQ8CKG EM0KL9fJ9UtiiWBA74SCmgGld2ddheVq8IEBGTnpfp6fxL3pxHapfiOTmgVeA8s= =7KT+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 16:13:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7EE1065670 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:13:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30CE8FC0C for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds12 with SMTP id ds12so2168810wgb.31 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:13:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Y++zAyyX7uA9tSK0RmokFGUHaUqSSUkvjzzQDX2sn8c=; b=p7AsNboLZybl13dLCYERzzyAXxvb7jR81D+GBXM4EJtaNdNjSqUUSwlrxuMMSkk9Cr hNJyD/ozStti4rOqoUC5cDz+mgKD08VfzIHBQex1+hDdR/q2O/CgbYCbhaiUwsj0eNFd dc+E4mCnEy8RWRQRAoGWhkntbESNTC5AR20hvv4S6fYuFN58Plimbx+xlrSs2QkCAwiM lR249elXKWUEV66DNHsFCxGWbeHHbFzUNWOqxLJH4SEgBSrHzVMr4P99FnQSIPq4oz8q 2Cfwzl6G0lNUMhaglNCZ/POIt2gbGJAUOydzvjcb/Ndq+DwlmRv6lTa9/IcuCatlh5V/ g0IA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.132.98 with SMTP id n76mr1818998wei.101.1334247198066; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:13:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.54.207 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:13:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:13:18 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: Oliver Heesakkers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: security/openssl so bump w/o mention in UPDATING X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:13:19 -0000 On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Oliver Heesakkers wrote: > security/openssl was brought up to 1.0.1 recently which includes bumping > OPENSSL_SHLIBVER from 7 to 8. > > Which means, that in order not to break surprisingly many ports on my > desktop > I have to "portmaster -r" this port. > > "portmaster -w" might have also done the trick and I'll leave mentions of > other ports-mgmt tools to whomever who will commit this to UPDATING as I > believe should happen. Sorry to sound like a broken record, but using 'portmaster -r' for this is using a .50 cal. machine gun to kill a fly. Serious over-kill! Install sysutils/bsdadminscripts, update the port (with -w if you want) and use 'pkg_libchk -o'. It will l list just the ports that actually link to the library in question. Then just re-install these ports. The number of ports needing re-installation will often drop from hundreds to a dozen or so. Not many things depend directly on openssl, but those ports' libraries are linked to a great many more. Just '-w' is of limited value if you update ports (and it appears that you do) as you will start getting rtld errors when an executable links to two shareables, one of which is linked to the old version and one to the new. For something like openssl, this will happen a lot and getting rid of references to the old openssl shareable is the only way to fix it. Because a fer ports do their own linking to shareables (java comes to mind), pkg_chklib will generate a few false positives. If you pipe the output to a grep for the shareable in question, you can avoid updating ports that don't need it. As pkg_libchk is just a shell script and one that can be a huge time-saver, I think I may start pushing to either be integrated into portmaster (I doubt Doug will go for that and I probably wouldn't, either) or made a standard tool for the system. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 17:53:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5051065672; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:53:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807BC8FC17; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:53:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C817E818; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:53:47 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4F87168B.4060707@acsalaska.net> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:53:15 +0200 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Hellenthal References: <20120412153021.GA23231@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <20120412153021.GA23231@DataIX.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, lev@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devel/subversion 1.7.4_1 & svnversion errors "E200030: sqlite: callback requested query abort" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:53:56 -0000 On 4/12/2012 17:30, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > Console# sqlite3 .svn/wc.db "pragma integrity_check" > ok Does that mean /usr/src/sys/.svn is a directory? -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 18:04:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46803106564A for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:04:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flo@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165AE8FC16 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:04:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nibbler-wlan.fritz.box (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3CI4pNV089748 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:04:52 GMT (envelope-from flo@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4F871943.8020403@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:04:51 +0200 From: Florian Smeets User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120410 Thunderbird/12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports ML References: <201203112026.30630.subbsd@gmail.com> <4F5DB7C7.6090308@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F5DB7C7.6090308@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: PHP 5.4.0 : lang/php54 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:04:53 -0000 On 12.03.12 09:45, Alex Dupre wrote: > Mr Dandy wrote: >> May be more correctly set PHP 5.4 by default to lang/php5, and repocopy >> current lang/php5 into lang/php53? >> >> Probably current maintainer of php (@ale) has the plan ;) > > released, then probably you should stick to lang/php52 port, or find a > maintainer and a committer willing to create and maintain lang/php53. > Just so everyone knows. I'm working on keeping PHP 5.3 and all it's slave ports. Other volunteers welcome of course. Florian From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 18:19:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EFB1065670 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:19:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@heesakkers.info) Received: from server4.ohos.nl (server4.ohos.nl [IPv6:2a00:d880:0:6::c951:214d]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5928FC0A for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:19:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [78.40.193.205] (helo=huis.heesakkers.info) by server4.ohos.nl with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SIOcL-000JkD-OS for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:19:39 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:19:38 +0200 From: Oliver Heesakkers To: In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5479d7fdf8836152540bfe9fbfa42c3b@huis.heesakkers.info> X-Sender: freebsd@heesakkers.info User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8-beta Subject: Re: security/openssl so bump w/o mention in UPDATING X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:19:40 -0000 Kevin Oberman schreef op 12.04.2012 18:13: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Oliver Heesakkers > wrote: >> security/openssl was brought up to 1.0.1 recently which includes >> bumping >> OPENSSL_SHLIBVER from 7 to 8. >> >> Which means, that in order not to break surprisingly many ports on >> my >> desktop >> I have to "portmaster -r" this port. >> >> "portmaster -w" might have also done the trick and I'll leave >> mentions of >> other ports-mgmt tools to whomever who will commit this to UPDATING >> as I >> believe should happen. > > Sorry to sound like a broken record, but using 'portmaster -r' for > this is using a .50 cal. machine gun to kill a fly. Serious > over-kill! > > Install sysutils/bsdadminscripts, update the port (with -w if you > want) and use 'pkg_libchk -o'. It will l list just the ports that > actually link to the library in question. Then just re-install these > ports. The number of ports needing re-installation will often drop > from hundreds to a dozen or so. Not many things depend directly on > openssl, but those ports' libraries are linked to a great many more. > > Just '-w' is of limited value if you update ports (and it appears > that > you do) as you will start getting rtld errors when an executable > links > to two shareables, one of which is linked to the old version and one > to the new. For something like openssl, this will happen a lot and > getting rid of references to the old openssl shareable is the only > way > to fix it. > > Because a fer ports do their own linking to shareables (java comes to > mind), pkg_chklib will generate a few false positives. If you pipe > the > output to a grep for the shareable in question, you can avoid > updating > ports that don't need it. > > As pkg_libchk is just a shell script and one that can be a huge > time-saver, I think I may start pushing to either be integrated into > portmaster (I doubt Doug will go for that and I probably wouldn't, > either) or made a standard tool for the system. Yes, you're quite right. I'll rephrase: IMHO *something* should be said in UPDATING, what exactly is up to maintainer / committer(s). From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 18:28:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6124A106564A; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:28:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B49D8FC0C; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so2212405vbm.13 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:28:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=QkeMtucLlO0CYW9+svdyPg1Et/W67eHyJTuK9ACBpbU=; b=SUVfvxrA1xMYYlrD/y1Lbi9tes9wx2xXSFXWAXxbFeOIdVHsPXffGtjf6/KQlhBB64 wFcGyA5FwzvXsXILT9Fn5+nb+o0AnO8BTtpR80BR7z0GV0cOrTikf5cTkUPJjC7g5ziW xkxoa5Io17WBTwMAPX2gUf83KTD9XaVu2VcXHA62OnyKmAIcca3leqinga8KiRuKLZUD /kA76BP00QMRlzs+zKeZ3+NamsvB0T+xt6Ve0GmIZNvLI7mw7kp6aDg4FkPzwy3kQG02 l40gNSdB80ajjrV+QqqMAVrio3znzp9kE1g2Mw8jX/QRVqHj7oZVUcIta5aT4eB+AVO3 epzg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.91.16 with SMTP id ca16mr1416411vdb.125.1334255286430; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:28:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.38.1 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:28:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:28:06 +0200 Message-ID: From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: timur@FreeBSD.org Subject: net/samba35 "needs" to have winbindd_enable set to yes - this can't be right X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:28:07 -0000 After I upgraded net/samba35 to version 3.5.14, I noticed this: root@kg-quiet# service samba status Cannot 'status' samba. Set winbindd_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or use 'onestatus' instead of 'status'. root@kg-quiet# service samba start Cannot 'start' samba. Set winbindd_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or use 'onestart' instead of 'start'. What? Since when? Ok, let's try to explicit set winbindd_enable to NO then: root@kg-quiet# grep winbind /etc/rc.conf winbindd_enable="NO" root@kg-quiet# service samba status Cannot 'status' samba. Set winbindd_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or use 'onestatus' instead of 'status'. root@kg-quiet# service samba start Cannot 'start' samba. Set winbindd_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or use 'onestart' instead of 'start'. Well, that defeats the purpose of having winbindd_enable at all. Yes, my Samba is built with WINBIND=on, but still it shouldn't fail this way. Here is my options: root@kg-quiet# make showconfig ===> The following configuration options are available for samba35-3.5.14: LDAP=on "With LDAP support" ADS=off "With Active Directory support" CUPS=on "With CUPS printing support" WINBIND=on "With WinBIND support" SWAT=off "With SWAT WebGUI" ACL_SUPPORT=off "With ACL support" AIO_SUPPORT=on "With Asyncronous IO support" FAM_SUPPORT=off "With File Alteration Monitor" SYSLOG=off "With Syslog support" QUOTAS=off "With Disk quota support" UTMP=off "With UTMP accounting support" PAM_SMBPASS=off "With PAM authentication vs passdb backends" DNSUPDATE=off "With dynamic DNS update(require ADS)" AVAHI=off "With Bonjour service discovery support" EXP_MODULES=off "With experimental modules" POPT=on "With system-wide POPT library" IPV6=on "With IPv6 support" MAX_DEBUG=off "With maximum debugging" SMBTORTURE=off "With smbtorture" ===> Use 'make config' to modify these settings and my FreeBSD version: root@kg-quiet# uname -a FreeBSD kg-quiet.kg4.no 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #1: Sat Jan 7 14:05:57 CET 2012 root@kg-quiet.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 How do I fix it? -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 19:14:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60853106566C for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:14:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5CD18FC1E for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:14:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhj6 with SMTP id hj6so5014966wib.13 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:14:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=262Idk4IWza5VdAJFhdwnqVRGWj2VgHq53H9rWL5K6A=; b=XItZfCXh+sZ0UjVnATuagphRQWk3SkN0lc5suiCKNs7E8KfJ5a1ulY1eCEgIfK9iQz jsGewumNFin+mxBHYJgz0ImZ1lmikfLVRwMbFu8aUT4VUFcmfjMRGWdlT+ilQOEm5ALH /5oKZjBss76FKw3RYUvbEz/rd5wS/jlfh8hvL5xTk3hxm97RfnuhliWqTDuAWawT0WZt EzsEuqBAWf3TVafQmytApCWdtap9gWYvkd+SoEIZ7+QWZxDhitv98QouURHJi39P4dzq nHF7jAe09HVdwpGNCvsy5KJTUg0BmNS1kFmRnUm+GXiBmqh60jyWSdIaFiJtHr+4LpM4 d7Iw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.104.230 with SMTP id gh6mr8411974wib.22.1334258092908; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:14:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.54.207 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:14:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5479d7fdf8836152540bfe9fbfa42c3b@huis.heesakkers.info> References: <5479d7fdf8836152540bfe9fbfa42c3b@huis.heesakkers.info> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:14:52 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: Oliver Heesakkers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: security/openssl so bump w/o mention in UPDATING X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:14:54 -0000 On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Oliver Heesakkers wrote: > Kevin Oberman schreef op 12.04.2012 18:13: >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Oliver Heesakkers >> wrote: >>> >>> security/openssl was brought up to 1.0.1 recently which includes bumpin= g >>> OPENSSL_SHLIBVER from 7 to 8. >>> >>> Which means, that in order not to break surprisingly many ports on my >>> desktop >>> I have to "portmaster -r" this port. >>> >>> "portmaster -w" might have also done the trick and I'll leave mentions = of >>> other ports-mgmt tools to whomever who will commit this to UPDATING as = I >>> believe should happen. >> >> >> Sorry to sound like a broken record, but using 'portmaster -r' for >> this is using a .50 cal. machine gun to kill a fly. Serious over-kill! >> >> Install sysutils/bsdadminscripts, update the port (with -w if you >> want) =A0and use 'pkg_libchk -o'. It will l list just the ports that >> actually link to the library in question. =A0Then just re-install these >> ports. The number of ports needing re-installation will often drop >> from hundreds to a dozen or so. Not many things depend directly on >> openssl, but those ports' libraries are linked to a great many more. >> >> Just '-w' is of limited value if you update ports (and it appears that >> you do) as you will start getting rtld errors when an executable links >> to two shareables, one of which is linked to the old version and one >> to the new. For something like openssl, this will happen a lot and >> getting rid of references to the old openssl shareable is the only way >> to fix it. >> >> Because a fer ports do their own linking to shareables (java comes to >> mind), pkg_chklib will generate a few false positives. If you pipe the >> output to a grep for the shareable in question, you can avoid updating >> ports that don't need it. >> >> As pkg_libchk is just a shell script and one that can be a huge >> time-saver, I think I may start pushing to either be integrated into >> portmaster (I doubt Doug will go for that and I probably wouldn't, >> either) or made a standard tool for the system. > > > Yes, you're quite right. I'll rephrase: > > IMHO *something* should be said in UPDATING, what exactly is up to > maintainer / committer(s). Indeed! I was a bit surprised that there was no entry. And, to accurately (and less hyperbolicly) state the advantage of using pkg_libchk, I am re-installing 64 ports while 'portmaster -r openssl' would have updated 364. Not quite the disparity I have seen with some ports that bumped shareable versions, but still very significant. (The system I am using is my old laptop with 1380 ports including gnome2 installed, so it's near worst case, I suspect.) --=20 R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 20:03:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACDB106564A for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:03:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8992A8FC08 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:03:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghrr20 with SMTP id r20so1633482ghr.13 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:03:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=fmOV14gR/YKkRGfHSdghcG0qPYituD/lslmXU78Lcv8=; b=dzgcdTiimKK731qvXNhuphp0tsI/xMhnYBMxrEa9dOMI2zyuCM3aF9G+8UcVE3RjWC 6eLb6Ri/6twtUrWMLr5cZ4xaQuB3b+wLv/8jyO32xY9Pa/OlCSiFvoue7Mqpddtxg7iV UJ5Ifu1VPN+wDPaACAmPdas2audjLPK2dwZHvI5gYs/9Du2Y+/PccoEpl0wrjHcjPMcg 8SXUlo9RW3xUY6gKIeeWYMRTdu3OiLEVFZ1D1AWUFoB+KZyI3wrK6815h+fG/nm+3KOy aXhZTGQ60gOFWN98fP0sdaBfDhWfydSakYmzkEVg6F5MJN13rf/pqBgUzPgT4IRFgREK Yw/w== Received: by 10.101.180.40 with SMTP id h40mr1050923anp.4.1334260980266; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:03:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o15sm12096994anj.1.2012.04.12.13.02.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:02:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3VTChx16Ydz2CG44 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:02:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:02:56 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120412160256.0feac5cf@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4F869CD2.2040702@onetel.com> References: <4F863615.80203@shatow.net> <4F864EEE.4010508@p6m7g8.com> <4F869CD2.2040702@onetel.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEUAAABYRlwJCw4FAgAIBwKprDkBAQFQLR0BAgCir7VRttp8AAACAUlEQVQ4jZWUTYvbMBCGTVl8V2hX6Gg5G5FbWQdBj0lEfE7BhN4cyzi5Wt1E5L70roWy6N92xok/skkP+5IYrMcz78xIduDWpNM3vFzuA/jX5EY1AI6KHFwW/CzFuQAwqUBbV12p+CzIh6Awq7sg33pn5D64SQXAexffeuQlA/L35RrkaB551OjGfP/cAO8mCNaDcgvfky5ijoD0pAXlCQCnljiAjsJD9Ax05Ko5sZxbnLQcmM+dZg5IjREfZrWIHK0JuwU68pAGwHvfRxBundRzTxxz3r9dNUikPsEihjz2Dc4kjp1hKsJGuot4EDxaxzMoC7XqhxhOSfZrTS6gSX1JVdjp+o1PvWfekXgw3WL0g70nDEwA0H0HQsEZc8sTmFMTkWUfYWC/vdR1zQy3xLQgLwzu90QnlnFLjeiGWBjwhb4Sa42IqOg2qqS4O1/zhKokFUb1Q8Rj4Eb69WVflXEehJ35DgChVTE5n50eaGyMLOfH8AOodoSM4PVYAQgQdBulOa+knklYks3vAuQ+uX492lTl+A+e8qBV2AKoXalVKFfyuUp0pUp1ARaUHh82lv9MN+Ig7CZtgE6FNYvjlywT2VP2dMgOG46gTIWcqdfvuwyXNz0oMJNd/N5lh1YNiJt19ADTUo3VuFSNeQwVqRSrGjSCp53fk2g+Mvfk/gfoPxHeUS8MH9vRAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlU0D3hc/tyyqTMe1j4xS+NCLZBu/sBVZDCOIOoJU0KCzmFR3StQG0oGQdjJsXPz4HBL4x6 Subject: Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade - Deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:03:07 -0000 On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:13:54 +0100 Chris Whitehouse articulated: > I'm only a lurker and lowly user but could I humbly request that > portmanager is brought back into use? It's simple to use and does > what it does extremely well and without fuss. I think the fact that > it still "just works" after all this time is a mark of it's worth. I totally agree. While I do use "portupgrade" from time to time, "portmanager" seems to fix problems that "portupgrade" can't and that "portmaster" just makes worse. Plus, "portmanager" is much faster than "portmaster" Then again, that is just my 2¢. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 20:15:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976D9106566C for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:15:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3BF8FC18 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:15:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl9 with SMTP id l9so1647297yen.13 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:15:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=jk9RaCVlvByArO4o0B2G6q+jSa7c8DmvrZGDHQiSsJU=; b=f8izynGrVfMhc0AXbEfjx5N4g4rfiUGssNGIqqYLX1uo2H8hnKV6MIKDq+sHgmxNBl O4Awk17fPXTwbYV++uFrtuX1EG9V8+s1lfrgxEC9W972jnaciQWNdDz6y1RMfOsUo7YR zs2pOtq+ZfafermdCsQIy7NkFHlq43ajwiLWUa5t8mfYZ50KrC0Ds1FK6JmVG46zDHEs 7tYPGCccSflgUr2qu5fgcwdebAt14AeBP9oSfnrENs2DKIB77m9FHWzdWPZEOHDGKlld kRqnSPvF3MzPFp6h8LBVzJxW8YhhDgJZb/eF031R+E40klL6jYuodal++BKkygcReF0D 2bLg== Received: by 10.100.244.33 with SMTP id r33mr1057689anh.54.1334261721430; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:15:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o6sm12152524ank.2.2012.04.12.13.15.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:15:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3VTCzB2v6Fz2CG44 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:15:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:15:17 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120412161517.7531647f@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQms/l7A7wNOa7LgP8idnfaJje4vkyiyA9NiobZ1+bUEaDSrR1/+AIR+RsphJGVHeyPRdK+e Subject: Re: net/samba35 "needs" to have winbindd_enable set to yes - this can't be right X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:15:22 -0000 On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:28:06 +0200 Torfinn Ingolfsen articulated: > After I upgraded net/samba35 to version 3.5.14, I noticed this: > root@kg-quiet# service samba status > Cannot 'status' samba. Set winbindd_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or > use 'onestatus' instead of 'status'. > root@kg-quiet# service samba start > Cannot 'start' samba. Set winbindd_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or > use 'onestart' instead of 'start'. > > What? Since when? > Ok, let's try to explicit set winbindd_enable to NO then: > root@kg-quiet# grep winbind /etc/rc.conf > winbindd_enable="NO" > > root@kg-quiet# service samba status > Cannot 'status' samba. Set winbindd_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or > use 'onestatus' instead of 'status'. > root@kg-quiet# service samba start > Cannot 'start' samba. Set winbindd_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or > use 'onestart' instead of 'start'. > > Well, that defeats the purpose of having winbindd_enable at all. > Yes, my Samba is built with WINBIND=on, but still it shouldn't fail > this way. Here is my options: > root@kg-quiet# make showconfig > ===> The following configuration options are available for > samba35-3.5.14: LDAP=on "With LDAP support" > ADS=off "With Active Directory support" > CUPS=on "With CUPS printing support" > WINBIND=on "With WinBIND support" > SWAT=off "With SWAT WebGUI" > ACL_SUPPORT=off "With ACL support" > AIO_SUPPORT=on "With Asyncronous IO support" > FAM_SUPPORT=off "With File Alteration Monitor" > SYSLOG=off "With Syslog support" > QUOTAS=off "With Disk quota support" > UTMP=off "With UTMP accounting support" > PAM_SMBPASS=off "With PAM authentication vs passdb backends" > DNSUPDATE=off "With dynamic DNS update(require ADS)" > AVAHI=off "With Bonjour service discovery support" > EXP_MODULES=off "With experimental modules" > POPT=on "With system-wide POPT library" > IPV6=on "With IPv6 support" > MAX_DEBUG=off "With maximum debugging" > SMBTORTURE=off "With smbtorture" > ===> Use 'make config' to modify these settings > > and my FreeBSD version: > root@kg-quiet# uname -a > FreeBSD kg-quiet.kg4.no 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #1: Sat Jan 7 > 14:05:57 CET 2012 > root@kg-quiet.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > How do I fix it? I had a similar experience with Samba-3.4 recently. I entered the "WINBINDD_ENABLED=YES" in the /etc/rc.conf file to get Samba working. Since I don't need the "winbindd" service, I reconfigured the Samba port to not build with it and then rebuilt the port. Personally, I believe that "WINBINDD" should be "OFF" by default; however, it is easy enough to configure the port not to build with it. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 21:09:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FD0106564A for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:09:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5EC8FC14 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:09:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcmm1 with SMTP id m1so2318755vcm.13 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:09:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P6lcANy+UZ59mE4liLvV6A/AWepIyIDsEX79KhuPmeI=; b=vg2W9rfig+P2a9V82iUsWG/ZKtXw9DlLhrdspa3b+eaIDEypZTHC/04/vYfJsRLlDc CaHr6jkBQ7NiU2WnqZRcgh+s9d7FRKFtYPPYSNKp3gUwUrt7uTZ0Z02u1y3eNZt/H8KA ysoZCpUhFz1z32NZgwjsu3JwdcMhogR6+nmzfSskqONNFYA6T60voqW8S7XZ9JCfL7ZT Y7VILFV14or69qo43Ucf4PW6rqxVGbSEQum2D+MXdNWQ5Uwjes9j3vkO6EXUiDJH7ySn gtBamzfkpOdLDDhJWWGSrLbkoGsTT7IEdj3dRZLxgyzV/z6KdaoBDLQ1QEylVwh+YAAq AGNg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.24.40 with SMTP id r8mr1613953vdf.108.1334264967706; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:09:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.38.1 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:09:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120412161517.7531647f@scorpio> References: <20120412161517.7531647f@scorpio> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:09:27 +0200 Message-ID: From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: net/samba35 "needs" to have winbindd_enable set to yes - this can't be right X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:09:28 -0000 On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Jerry wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:28:06 +0200 > Torfinn Ingolfsen articulated: > >> After I upgraded net/samba35 to version 3.5.14, I noticed this: >> root@kg-quiet# service samba status >> Cannot 'status' samba. Set winbindd_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or >> use 'onestatus' instead of 'status'. >> root@kg-quiet# service samba start >> Cannot 'start' samba. Set winbindd_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or >> use 'onestart' instead of 'start'. >> >> What? Since when? >> Ok, let's try to explicit set winbindd_enable to NO then: >> root@kg-quiet# grep winbind /etc/rc.conf >> winbindd_enable=3D"NO" >> >> root@kg-quiet# service samba status >> Cannot 'status' samba. Set winbindd_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or >> use 'onestatus' instead of 'status'. >> root@kg-quiet# service samba start >> Cannot 'start' samba. Set winbindd_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or >> use 'onestart' instead of 'start'. >> >> Well, that defeats the purpose of having winbindd_enable at all. >> Yes, my Samba is built with WINBIND=3Don, but still it shouldn't fail >> this way. Here is my options: >> root@kg-quiet# make showconfig >> =3D=3D=3D> The following configuration options are available for >> samba35-3.5.14: LDAP=3Don "With LDAP support" >> =A0 =A0 =A0ADS=3Doff "With Active Directory support" >> =A0 =A0 =A0CUPS=3Don "With CUPS printing support" >> =A0 =A0 =A0WINBIND=3Don "With WinBIND support" >> =A0 =A0 =A0SWAT=3Doff "With SWAT WebGUI" >> =A0 =A0 =A0ACL_SUPPORT=3Doff "With ACL support" >> =A0 =A0 =A0AIO_SUPPORT=3Don "With Asyncronous IO support" >> =A0 =A0 =A0FAM_SUPPORT=3Doff "With File Alteration Monitor" >> =A0 =A0 =A0SYSLOG=3Doff "With Syslog support" >> =A0 =A0 =A0QUOTAS=3Doff "With Disk quota support" >> =A0 =A0 =A0UTMP=3Doff "With UTMP accounting support" >> =A0 =A0 =A0PAM_SMBPASS=3Doff "With PAM authentication vs passdb backends= " >> =A0 =A0 =A0DNSUPDATE=3Doff "With dynamic DNS update(require ADS)" >> =A0 =A0 =A0AVAHI=3Doff "With Bonjour service discovery support" >> =A0 =A0 =A0EXP_MODULES=3Doff "With experimental modules" >> =A0 =A0 =A0POPT=3Don "With system-wide POPT library" >> =A0 =A0 =A0IPV6=3Don "With IPv6 support" >> =A0 =A0 =A0MAX_DEBUG=3Doff "With maximum debugging" >> =A0 =A0 =A0SMBTORTURE=3Doff "With smbtorture" >> =3D=3D=3D> Use 'make config' to modify these settings >> >> and my FreeBSD version: >> root@kg-quiet# uname -a >> FreeBSD kg-quiet.kg4.no 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #1: Sat Jan =A07 >> 14:05:57 CET 2012 >> root@kg-quiet.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC =A0amd64 >> >> How do I fix it? > > I had a similar experience with Samba-3.4 recently. I entered the > "WINBINDD_ENABLED=3DYES" in the /etc/rc.conf file to get Samba working. > Since I don't need the "winbindd" service, I reconfigured the Samba > port to not build with it and then rebuilt the port. But did you report that the port wasn't working as intended? > Personally, I believe that "WINBINDD" should be "OFF" by default; > however, it is easy enough to configure the port not to build with it. > I agree that it is easy to reconfigure and rebuild the port. But - the port still has a startup script that isn't working as intended; that is an error in the port. Such errors should be reported so that port maintainers so that errors might be corrected. Which is what I have done. --=20 Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 22:13:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F8F1065670 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:13:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@dataix.net) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F988FC0C for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:13:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so4369831iah.13 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:13:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dataix.net; s=rsa; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=R4Gx8VYoHcoIzF8c+oIecGkMnCORTtfq2O5lGoSF6m0=; b=djKM/ur5ww0zyEhCQST8VGe9gmTMErK2HBkKxqJwpAHywN1EUmGm7+D945K7R+KxLi Q9WxTjTDlkXQmJS9LaOEFgEF9VLIxgCNczWITUa8tERMuWO7BNiS/J9+F9X/fbe1diWH +nIEVhNmDTXm4lz2U0uNxT5cBmZIYmpgiKA84= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-gm-message-state; bh=R4Gx8VYoHcoIzF8c+oIecGkMnCORTtfq2O5lGoSF6m0=; b=U/y/RiQ0edDyqeJ0p5kZ0KeK+E0EwcD78J+uV6NKVXHybszRNizQFn76+R9cZmwRfs QWVs2/JIqkiqFnbpOyJzPvfriOEEJkODj3GvcxKUkwtF8zWsSMHPHKoZ/fuR+Mw+RDNm qFJEQKCrH2VGknBRRWRjoWmOVQmQuAdCafu+xzo302DsNEtdpaxJgH5pdUi5wU2IelN2 PvHTortuPjkFjiSRrKC4MiThXH+M4QbMflAk7EEeCYOeaJH2sm5UvIcZG+gNZVrq2zfx 56uVhXB/KfgZrq1kLk0qDmOQhZA01tGsmqAPj8lCNFQ7mZuK8Ek/nSyjqbJUuN8sa48N RVjQ== Received: by 10.50.191.169 with SMTP id gz9mr4234481igc.5.1334268807253; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:13:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (adsl-99-181-142-73.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net. [99.181.142.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i6sm455344igq.3.2012.04.12.15.13.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:13:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3CMDOOO086034 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:13:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Received: (from jhellenthal@localhost) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q3CMDN94086033; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:13:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:13:23 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal To: Mel Flynn Message-ID: <20120412221323.GA86016@DataIX.net> References: <20120412153021.GA23231@DataIX.net> <4F87168B.4060707@acsalaska.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F87168B.4060707@acsalaska.net> X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnTVhDn7DWEN7p6p9Mowj5HcDigP2IgTaJ5lUb96gUtphlSFlbauDJv/KYBequ9LHDy5LgR Cc: ports@freebsd.org, lev@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devel/subversion 1.7.4_1 & svnversion errors "E200030: sqlite: callback requested query abort" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:13:28 -0000 In 1.7 and upgrade results in only one .svn directory located in /usr/src/.svn. On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 07:53:15PM +0200, Mel Flynn wrote: > On 4/12/2012 17:30, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > > Console# sqlite3 .svn/wc.db "pragma integrity_check" > > ok > > Does that mean /usr/src/sys/.svn is a directory? > > -- > Mel -- ;s =; From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 13 02:21:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A817E106566C for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 02:21:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 130478FC0A for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 02:21:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2012 02:21:45 -0000 Received: from f055058105.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO mandree.no-ip.org) [78.55.58.105] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 13 Apr 2012 04:21:45 +0200 X-Authenticated: #428038 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19EIbt/rDdEIQQyU9c4RDV2eSj/XkN/r610jqX/C4 Ycy+YRDU7psM7M Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57CD23CEAF for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 04:21:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4F878DB8.5010600@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 04:21:44 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120313 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F863615.80203@shatow.net> <4F864EEE.4010508@p6m7g8.com> <4F869CD2.2040702@onetel.com> <20120412160256.0feac5cf@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120412160256.0feac5cf@scorpio> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade - Deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 02:21:53 -0000 Am 12.04.2012 22:02, schrieb Jerry: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:13:54 +0100 > Chris Whitehouse articulated: > >> I'm only a lurker and lowly user but could I humbly request that >> portmanager is brought back into use? It's simple to use and does >> what it does extremely well and without fuss. I think the fact that >> it still "just works" after all this time is a mark of it's worth. > > I totally agree. While I do use "portupgrade" from time to time, > "portmanager" seems to fix problems that "portupgrade" can't and that > "portmaster" just makes worse. Plus, "portmanager" is much faster than > "portmaster" I'm pretty sure that Doug Barton would be quite interested to read concise and detailed descriptions of situations where portmaster makes problems worse. I've been using portmaster for quite a while now without functional issues. It has the occasional usability quirk, doesn't attempt to recover from a build issue (unlike portupgrade). That proves nothing, of course, particularly not the absense of bugs, might be that I'm lucky or not using buggy functions... The point I'm trying to make is that portmaster alone is quite reliable for me -- YMMV -- but then again I'm not mixing portupgrade in. I'm not sure how much testing Doug has done when portmaster is supposed to repair damage that portupgrade might have inflicted earlier. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 13 09:06:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA28106566C for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from anakin.london.02.net (anakin.london.02.net [87.194.255.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D296F8FC08 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muji2.config (87.194.237.233) by anakin.london.02.net (8.5.140) id 4EEB63D20217A0AE for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:06:26 +0100 Message-ID: <4F87EC92.6010003@onetel.com> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:06:26 +0100 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100924 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4F863615.80203@shatow.net> <4F864EEE.4010508@p6m7g8.com> <4F869CD2.2040702@onetel.com> <4F86A87D.7030309@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade - Deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:06:34 -0000 On 12/04/2012 11:09, Chris Rees wrote: > > Chris, I did misread your email-- portmanager appears absolutely fine, > and is in no danger of removal :) That's good to know thank you. Sorry, portupgrade to portmanager was a bit of a sneaky corner. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 13 09:41:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546EE106566C for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:41:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46FC14E3FC; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:41:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 02:41:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Torfinn Ingolfsen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20120412161517.7531647f@scorpio> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: net/samba35 "needs" to have winbindd_enable set to yes - this can't be right X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:41:55 -0000 This is fixed in the latest version. Sorry for the inconvenience. Doug -- It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short. Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 13 12:57:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89638106564A for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:57:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rodrigo@bebik.net) Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7562A8FC0A for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldfaithful.bebik.local (unknown [82.227.164.69]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE5EA6285 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:57:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: by oldfaithful.bebik.local (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 252752EE98; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:04:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:04:10 +0200 From: Rodrigo OSORIO To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120413130409.GA17320@oldfaithful.bebik.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: nginx security update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:57:55 -0000 Hi, A new entry seems to be needed in the vuxml database to report this new security issue for both nginx < 1.0.5 and nginx-dev < 1.1.19. Regards, Rodrigo OSORIO On 13/04/12 12:11 +0000, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > osa 2012-04-13 12:11:04 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > www/nginx Makefile distinfo > Log: > Security update from 1.0.14 to 1.0.15. > > > > *) Security: specially crafted mp4 file might allow to overwrite memory > locations in a worker process if the ngx_http_mp4_module was used, > potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution (CVE-2012-2089). > Thanks to Matthew Daley. > > *) Bugfix: in the ngx_http_mp4_module. > > > > Revision Changes Path > 1.318 +1 -1 ports/www/nginx/Makefile > 1.276 +2 -2 ports/www/nginx/distinfo > _______________________________________________ > cvs-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ----- End forwarded message ----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 13 19:04:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E794106566B for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:04:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nacho319@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEDB8FC0A for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl9 with SMTP id l9so2245385yen.13 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:04:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MJQCGWBxpPb4K6QCeA4OdsyFmk2X/1kLQz6HCK5wiDA=; b=k6I555AiaBQJ/HCGvgssDdkIgp+yGs1yQzBNDR3Xv3ZCOqZVChzuIvNHH/1q0YtEdF MX951qvyp0zqrkT6pfCMaDTTDwP4bcBlHsiU06mhudALxvdq/MXK2Y1yoTSUevNjFVXf /gj/U1ISBRrjjrv3s3ML8AtTvHit0o3mBLEMyRnWXnsu7vZSwLMf8OTFM4KctplAGODx R3OIfNLBkaaJVMrLdphVznRmp0o3AC7jd4u/triJ7SmXQKGmnPeVJs3d+NwyYmuarmUO YcOqX3P3SooB9+OZ6EDiLnHC3KXariy16esKnkjNKw8xQs11uD+H5T7k7qTSh34iCJlj +TJQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.114.200 with SMTP id c48mr2848850yhh.23.1334343885264; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:04:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.146.153.2 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:04:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:04:45 -0400 Message-ID: From: Chris Inacio To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: port variants X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:04:51 -0000 Hello all, I was recently asked to do some FreeBSD ports support work. I mostly use a Mac and the MacPorts system. MacPorts has the concept of a variant for a port, but I can't find the analogue in the FreeBSD system. Does the FreeBSD ports system have the concept of a variant? If so, can someone point me in the right direction on how to create one? Thanks, Chris Inacio From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 13 19:39:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E50106564A for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:39:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D44C8FC12 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:39:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcmm1 with SMTP id m1so3208555vcm.13 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:39:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Pr79an8h3+j5WVc5/aUl3IQ0T8WeDdrIPJeA2dla4Iw=; b=IO7ejCmAv2rao+d88nX98KxWBsLZxvT39/jXGxwzru7+wIOx/e4Yb9WTSm3/MapJgh sLf5jDz3+NJqDq0ECwZDX6ZKi2RTZu6ftQwM7A+aj6ri4K6yhMxXmKZyepcoYNcP9h17 m2uCI6+Uerm02g1/IA0AwBm1A3GhM3GoR86vBi1vsNPa0sLLMGchNEPEK8fdRsHVxpLr 42Nfs5RorM2tAsi+6FV8DH3vMj64sDOFXzgPFhLzyAaRlx4PfJhpIc4IadMSSQwMfUgC od9Vqn/3csxunJytD+/M/T0ofnHCuZ0rLx/fjO+7z9PfrKa+6MGseySArlf1NEx2SQt7 BTSw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.155.7 with SMTP id q7mr1331174vcw.71.1334345992191; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:39:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.180.198 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:39:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:39:52 -0700 Message-ID: From: Freddie Cash To: Chris Inacio Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port variants X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:39:58 -0000 On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Chris Inacio wrote: > I was recently asked to do some FreeBSD ports support work. =C2=A0I mostl= y use a > Mac and the MacPorts system. =C2=A0MacPorts has the concept of a variant = for a > port, but I can't find the analogue in the FreeBSD system. > > Does the FreeBSD ports system have the concept of a variant? =C2=A0If so,= can > someone point me in the right direction on how to create one? Describing what a "variant" is, how it works in MacPorts, and what you are trying to do would help a lot. :) The closest guess I could make would be "slave port", but I don't think that works the same way. --=20 Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 13 19:54:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26660106564A for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:54:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward10.mail.yandex.net (forward10.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:202::5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8508FC0A for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:54:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp7.mail.yandex.net (smtp7.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.55]) by forward10.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 184C91020F69; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 23:54:16 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1334346856; bh=PHlyiHA/7NXTTYOa7wSk4tVkgJaUUdz8eqvKWvi/Gcc=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=jk0Z1xmRVi+lUyEbllIUO4FS6xAl2ajqUTDbyp4CCj3Y4Izr3gl7Qj2UcYDZEbnCB dnovy3h3gNOx5qHDcRwAoEaLreUP8S8efL6s6FE8aJFhBEq7RIB26GjB5apuZ12Bg5 MQ32SJ9Vath2fuTsoYwZFD5xCuD+8xxrdQDT8PLk= Received: from smtp7.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp7.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id DC8F71580408; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 23:54:15 +0400 (MSK) Received: from unknown (unknown [178.76.224.133]) by smtp7.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id sFwqrvHQ-sFw4vrW5; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 23:54:15 +0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1334346855; bh=PHlyiHA/7NXTTYOa7wSk4tVkgJaUUdz8eqvKWvi/Gcc=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=iTOSZ84xk6O/uq9OTBoY9DfGX9ddGAtpdlo0EP3kx5M6n2W2G9XeAZVLHW6xqL4M2 10h9GTKG8nvqpPdgiOeP8PamPRk7NNHm9cXgDPEa0ddyYWGitI+IBzQkJ+/3MvO9P8 qyvEHTXKIdx8Wjlwr8zhH2hlHw7a595kDM5oW5l4= Message-ID: <4F888440.2080408@yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 23:53:36 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freddie Cash References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Chris Inacio Subject: Re: port variants X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:54:18 -0000 Freddie Cash wrote on 13.04.2012 23:39: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Chris Inacio wrote: >> I was recently asked to do some FreeBSD ports support work. I mostly use a >> Mac and the MacPorts system. MacPorts has the concept of a variant for a >> port, but I can't find the analogue in the FreeBSD system. >> >> Does the FreeBSD ports system have the concept of a variant? If so, can >> someone point me in the right direction on how to create one? > > Describing what a "variant" is, how it works in MacPorts, and what you > are trying to do would help a lot. :) > > The closest guess I could make would be "slave port", but I don't > think that works the same way. http://guide.macports.org/chunked/reference.variants.html Chris, the job needed should be described in more detail, but at glance options framework - it's what you looking for [1]. [1] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/book.html#MAKEFILE-OPTIONS -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 13 19:55:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314A4106566C for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:55:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nacho319@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f42.google.com (mail-qa0-f42.google.com [209.85.216.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B8D8FC0C for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:55:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qafi31 with SMTP id i31so5665697qaf.15 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:55:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to :message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=VmysVoLnmA3o0feGTy/2f0OA9l0fRZe/IpHcjsuLSMg=; b=Wh4Y2qiIzJx79ZngCasRf7VYA/+wbCzYHMqtAK7JtSEdd/+QZd99eZhg1hU0Zws7KN 5QhSMJPyheQVOVyhxqmkVjcZhGMyghkUqeghGJCVC99VahvFaH6ggX3bs6y7goCeFik4 f1HX3PDFVKxnDfjmpGI0C70hZGM4JaGsxY8q7OfI44me0P+rH6hfTx+in9wAsVCnySmL 6fEtDTkXgwSsveG+b6+ush3Hv90ogj0iI02yc8Tqn6biCm5b7buE0Ha8mVVe7ojivxeE GqwlVN9dcCM+434dRPOeD3oiu4QBridYx+YMCA6UUI14P0jOWX33DDdKHa0qzvxSCPR8 fj4A== Received: by 10.224.173.139 with SMTP id p11mr4497247qaz.14.1334346945163; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:55:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.22] (pool-96-236-157-241.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net. [96.236.157.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gw8sm19201823qab.7.2012.04.13.12.55.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:55:44 -0700 (PDT) References: From: Chris Inacio Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B176) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <0E61DE82-499B-47EF-9EEA-F9F3EB166A0A@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:55:42 -0400 To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: port variants X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:55:46 -0000 On Apr 13, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Chris Inacio wrote:= >> I was recently asked to do some FreeBSD ports support work. I mostly use= a >> Mac and the MacPorts system. MacPorts has the concept of a variant for a= >> port, but I can't find the analogue in the FreeBSD system. >>=20 >> Does the FreeBSD ports system have the concept of a variant? If so, can >> someone point me in the right direction on how to create one? >=20 > Describing what a "variant" is, how it works in MacPorts, and what you > are trying to do would help a lot. :) >=20 > The closest guess I could make would be "slave port", but I don't > think that works the same way. >=20 Sorry, you're right.=20 For example, a port of say Emacs could have a variant of X11.=20 So Emacs or Emacs+X11.=20 The X11 variant would (somewhat obviously) include building regular Emacs bu= t also the X11 toolbar etc. while Emacs wouldn't include any X11 features (&= dependencies).=20 On the Mac, we can build universal binaries (PowerPC, ia32, and x86_64), at t= he cost of disk space. So we can build almost any package with the +universa= l variant.=20 Is that a reasonable explanation? Chris > --=20 > Freddie Cash > fjwcash@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 13 19:58:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5C51065670 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:58:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00028FC14 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so3272946vbm.13 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:58:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jr+AEM4igOQwT4JJizF46uPEy31qmmjUgoAnPrrZJ88=; b=xtaSXru5QQe8LWXvw38ZQtaOyMpcsPzJv+6n4F4MjRaFmU52IVnXF/vlF1LCwKixjj UMd5GYI1SeH30HUas/MuRTsghGjxhAGjZ+HXmLGlkOEI2jIpcD9yH7MygcioUMjO4fqf myXxy5OR5hpSADuT3jHERmw9f5OkHIIGRQvGfn9XPAwD2ZtQUyELvyo/nUf23e7zwRO+ 2YpZuMp/xGUZ4LogMyf4P7JRBz+caBQaTKZ62ajYwB5gKOdHRXUo56yg2efQC1AvXlGW ARry+Rkhc4fTLv+m9qQSMJkCYtqTe6I3eO0pIIpkwU4ASxtsD0OOaQMHx0h9uOS8ldlI b/Qg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.107.208 with SMTP id c16mr1366822vcp.65.1334347090844; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:58:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.38.1 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:58:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120412161517.7531647f@scorpio> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:58:10 +0200 Message-ID: From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: net/samba35 "needs" to have winbindd_enable set to yes - this can't be right X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:58:12 -0000 On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Doug Barton wrote: > This is fixed in the latest version. Sorry for the inconvenience. Quickly fixed - Thanks! BTW, to the ones who reported and fixed it - also thanks for the previous quick upgrade which fixed the security vulnerability. > > Doug > > -- > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DN= S. > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Yours for the right price. =A0:) =A0http://SupersetSolutio= ns.com/ > --=20 Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 13 20:01:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65566106566C for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:01:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from annulen@yandex.ru) Received: from forward17.mail.yandex.net (forward17.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1402::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB2B8FC18 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:01:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web24.yandex.ru (web24.yandex.ru [95.108.253.233]) by forward17.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 61EAB1061768; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:01:05 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1334347265; bh=jbPvq81Dqn2wszOLLu/qIEUrRahFnBrfq9uaydtez6s=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:MIME-Version:Message-Id: Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type; b=q2wf3nCy1LFRIWSnjSeblRWUTYcWSu5smbpHbM6QKTPyZJTJxiSG+zQv0A/a2K1rF TIZVXYDLf4dG6J9Va8mt97IH7NPoSLt1xaxSRwtH/5mkq5uNx/wil6sG1w+PmCVR3c 0lW0shNVmpNzL0x0kMj2XeFTBCWLMGACZEodKavc= Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by web24.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 1E0EE3AA0016; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:01:05 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1334347265; bh=jbPvq81Dqn2wszOLLu/qIEUrRahFnBrfq9uaydtez6s=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:MIME-Version:Message-Id: Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type; b=q2wf3nCy1LFRIWSnjSeblRWUTYcWSu5smbpHbM6QKTPyZJTJxiSG+zQv0A/a2K1rF TIZVXYDLf4dG6J9Va8mt97IH7NPoSLt1xaxSRwtH/5mkq5uNx/wil6sG1w+PmCVR3c 0lW0shNVmpNzL0x0kMj2XeFTBCWLMGACZEodKavc= Received: from [212.119.246.21] ([212.119.246.21]) by web24.yandex.ru with HTTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:01:04 +0400 From: Konstantin Tokarev To: Chris Inacio In-Reply-To: <0E61DE82-499B-47EF-9EEA-F9F3EB166A0A@gmail.com> References: <0E61DE82-499B-47EF-9EEA-F9F3EB166A0A@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <866281334347264@web24.yandex.ru> Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:01:04 +0400 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: port variants X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:01:07 -0000 13.04.2012, 23:55, "Chris Inacio" : > On Apr 13, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Chris Inacio wrote: >>> I was recently asked to do some FreeBSD ports support work. I mostly use a >>> Mac and the MacPorts system. MacPorts has the concept of a variant for a >>> port, but I can't find the analogue in the FreeBSD system. >>> >>> Does the FreeBSD ports system have the concept of a variant? If so, can >>> someone point me in the right direction on how to create one? >> Describing what a "variant" is, how it works in MacPorts, and what you >> are trying to do would help a lot. :) >> >> The closest guess I could make would be "slave port", but I don't >> think that works the same way. > > Sorry, you're right. > > For example, a port of say Emacs could have a variant of X11. > > So Emacs or Emacs+X11. > > The X11 variant would (somewhat obviously) include building regular Emacs but also the X11 toolbar etc. while Emacs wouldn't include any X11 features (& dependencies). > > On the Mac, we can build universal binaries (PowerPC, ia32, and x86_64), at the cost of disk space. So we can build almost any package with the +universal variant. > > Is that a reasonable explanation? Seems like you need makefile options: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-options.html -- Regards, Konstantin From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 13 22:38:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925331065676 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 22:38:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com (mail-wg0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ADA88FC20 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 22:38:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so6213576wgb.1 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:38:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eJzxcfk96hoQCWO6+NwCcNSaenXoU8xCzrYLZ/50oEo=; b=WecWGXD/s4NmzmgPbQs/4/4ymPSvqxlqFqZHLO8Hj3z5pxx1c2H7obwpNYcdKTmC7B yZ8SCD1CQf4PdXL8vNIPiTetdwMap4tquWHW9t+OCHn96GQ2vGr36KhwFZ9bbdrkpA+w s7hIH+XQh4P1/1Ohcjox7ZTuicIAN0hH782M/Drpe+xhSwB8GuZE8T2qhWdYze6NPDn5 dGITrdVgiCJ+1Sws0Z/KdQpDPcOKnQEUMaT1T+Jc6v83sNsHGnd8gajwb1fo/rGTkfHY AnWUSYT7qYWn0EsISKREzrZQLhSYfwzRTihWeCdTebOLlbOvhz79Jy+omUALIC8hvB/5 Ocjg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.135.223 with SMTP id u73mr1872474wei.117.1334356691772; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.54.207 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:38:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <866281334347264@web24.yandex.ru> References: <0E61DE82-499B-47EF-9EEA-F9F3EB166A0A@gmail.com> <866281334347264@web24.yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:38:11 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: Konstantin Tokarev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , Chris Inacio Subject: Re: port variants X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 22:38:13 -0000 2012/4/13 Konstantin Tokarev : > > > 13.04.2012, 23:55, "Chris Inacio" : >> On Apr 13, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: >> >>> =A0On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Chris Inacio = wrote: >>>> =A0I was recently asked to do some FreeBSD ports support work. =A0I mo= stly use a >>>> =A0Mac and the MacPorts system. =A0MacPorts has the concept of a varia= nt for a >>>> =A0port, but I can't find the analogue in the FreeBSD system. >>>> >>>> =A0Does the FreeBSD ports system have the concept of a variant? =A0If = so, can >>>> =A0someone point me in the right direction on how to create one? >>> =A0Describing what a "variant" is, how it works in MacPorts, and what y= ou >>> =A0are trying to do would help a lot. =A0:) >>> >>> =A0The closest guess I could make would be "slave port", but I don't >>> =A0think that works the same way. >> >> Sorry, you're right. >> >> For example, a port of say Emacs could have a variant of X11. >> >> So Emacs or Emacs+X11. >> >> The X11 variant would (somewhat obviously) include building regular Emac= s but also the X11 toolbar etc. while Emacs wouldn't include any X11 featur= es (& dependencies). >> >> On the Mac, we can build universal binaries (PowerPC, ia32, and x86_64),= at the cost of disk space. So we can build almost any package with the +un= iversal variant. >> >> Is that a reasonable explanation? > > Seems like you need makefile options: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-options.htm= l While I think makefile-options is the way to go, I should also point out that for the specific case of emacs and X11, it is not used due to the very large differences. Other "variants" are handled via options, but there are separate emacs and emacs-nox11 ports. Most obviously, all of the emacs options are X11 related and there is no way that I know to have two sets of options with one list dependent on the other. If there are only a coupe of cases of this, it may be noted on the options like: THREADS " Build with thread support" On \ FOO "Foo support (requires THREADS)" OFF \ The port maintainer/developer has to make a call as to which approach is more practical, but I suspect portmgr@ will press for maximum use of makefile-options. --=20 R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 14 03:06:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7964106566C for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 03:06:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.tsatsenko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00B68FC0A for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 03:06:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadz14 with SMTP id z14so15315788dad.17 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:06:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/8vziPCNeIk8DJzMomXp8A9+osm+utvOEHrcYqAe+A0=; b=rjehAdFRXiS+RmsintKyCGiEaURfXmZ3+U1LRVq7dqEkl+xhKYq9bECjVSgDVoNj27 yVFpc8i7Fh9wnw/7bgpqflF+2nWfTcG7MQiEV5xYHmiWER7eRd3A7ul4DaKcb1CBo0it GLP/JQhBtsiuAnB1/ye8mmDk1mSy6dh8dFruG8LdsToBxnyONC+o4mhw3TIn1QE9OjWL s3GBVrhkvpVV5hFwoaWGQPsNtx4k5VrUN958BhvZV6lLDZQX8qXW8AniGk32cqA2d9DM K9UU3Ds2qJMd7J2IOmzr5ZCdSJkcC46oamVURDsuCCn+HwZZBLLvBxinEdjmVPPtOyZ8 DFSA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.132.232 with SMTP id ox8mr9194632pbb.145.1334372765642; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:06:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.226.7 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:06:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:06:05 +0400 Message-ID: From: Mikhail Tsatsenko To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: databases/sqlrelay DEPRECATED X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 03:06:07 -0000 Although the port currently does not build there is a PR 166409 containing a patch to fix it. With this patch applied port builds just fine. So I suggest to unDEPRECATE sqlrelay port or at least to shift an EXPIRATION DATE. -- Mikhail From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 14 03:25:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6EA1065673 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 03:25:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@e-e.com) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.pub.dw.redsrci.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140FE8FC19 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 03:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D729A713726; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:25:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=e-e.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :user-agent:from:from:subject:subject:date:date:references :in-reply-to:message-id:received:received:received; s=ee; t= 1334373929; x=1336188329; bh=ipt/2YhuB5SlwmnxtS7ls+S+IrgWncbx2Zl cFvjDpJc=; b=ATpIoVzuouWmivZl5r/vxqELqW9cquG6LCUuX29Bf6EC7RHrwQy oTAGy4UXlchaMldKQQhewlCt1q0jSNoSnAPc1M4N+td7Y4NNBFWbyE0x8GK6Cstf jq8eQszbd7Q0ndXzmoY/Yob2+b++sTxzyIitUXAZ2dJfnBMF4H7Nyl7A= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.dw.redsrci.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id augwnghTcW4x; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:25:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9685B713422; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:25:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 66.122.76.184 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhelfman) by mail.experts-exchange.com with HTTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:25:29 -0700 Message-ID: <60f4f4334f50b47a069002113ce780bb.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:25:29 -0700 From: "Jason Helfman" To: "Mikhail Tsatsenko" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: databases/sqlrelay DEPRECATED X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 03:25:35 -0000 > Although the port currently does not build there is a PR 166409 > containing a patch to fix it. With this patch applied port builds just > fine. > So I suggest to unDEPRECATE sqlrelay port or at least to shift an > EXPIRATION DATE. > > -- > Mikhail Is this comment still true from the pr: Sqlrelay 0.44 requires newer rudiments 0.35 If so, I am building what the patch is now, however the portstree does have rudiments 0.35, now. I am taking care of this now, and can get it updated soon. -jgh From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 14 03:42:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126CA1065675 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 03:42:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.tsatsenko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB368FC0C for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 03:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbcwz17 with SMTP id wz17so4623861pbc.13 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:42:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=i25uTsyaFF17sk/Icn0/H1vGuKjWlncHIkVhpxMzXnY=; b=BXS83ccJyOIiEyMWG/a0l/fJ1EnzG5A8Bqz4gOdZMOx0ShEwgQriWJXj31RU89QNmQ Nctyy2xSuwSjYXntyzMI3uOIWSvSq9FbwEYVnRQcZ6HVoWiIdRtmyIupwhbqzJLOjE6T JkBTcr4L+1LOzSpDzY4yotkorQZq1FTTyu+9J8Nn/9aZY1SECqCI0MviwNXf8Gv5VfvH iCAYj5+3OCxp/tR16Bzots/sJn0lkrsIZqL7SKO9cnu1w06AjHbvrgUjUgX8GM1HKChl PXj3VqVZV2Mxuuta344F823DxNnqfERrLCyceqUbRxOv2jytTlF4qxiPYmtw1Vbh/ekA A/Sw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.226.168 with SMTP id rt8mr9503543pbc.103.1334374923410; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:42:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.226.7 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:42:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <60f4f4334f50b47a069002113ce780bb.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> References: <60f4f4334f50b47a069002113ce780bb.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:42:03 +0400 Message-ID: From: Mikhail Tsatsenko To: Jason Helfman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: databases/sqlrelay DEPRECATED X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 03:42:04 -0000 > Is this comment still true from the pr: > Sqlrelay 0.44 requires newer rudiments 0.35 Yes, It is. I just successfully built sqlrelay 0.44 against rudiments 0.35 > If so, I am building what the patch is now, however the portstree does > have rudiments 0.35, now. Looks like I have missed this update while submitting PR. The patch to update sqlrelay to 0.44 is still trivial http://pastebin.com/gAAnguwE -- Mikhail > I am taking care of this now, and can get it updated soon. > > -jgh > > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 14 04:33:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C42F106566B for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 04:33:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@e-e.com) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.pub.dw.redsrci.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54FE58FC0A for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 04:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 274C37136D5; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:33:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=e-e.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :user-agent:from:from:subject:subject:date:date:references :in-reply-to:message-id:received:received:received; s=ee; t= 1334378021; x=1336192421; bh=tBSPZmOouXQt/4eONaFjoaUaVZFSq7NL0a/ ebPSct24=; b=NqxYE8ZAMEUO9LiImTNYRNZ72qxJ5V7Wgb+nbiKx6gZxytnegAi JMbJQ4Cfn8ZENniHJ8YH2HDA45ubZtNDwezOr5x6ITBmOzzzU+NXyhKMyAnkM4jN lf+6H1lbSBCaJxfY342y+79QFz4olmibr9cWL9o274epdfCPxY/rg6wk= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.dw.redsrci.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kxaRE0B4YCbj; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:33:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4127136AE; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:33:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 66.122.76.184 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhelfman) by mail.experts-exchange.com with HTTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:33:40 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <60f4f4334f50b47a069002113ce780bb.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:33:40 -0700 From: "Jason Helfman" To: "Mikhail Tsatsenko" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: databases/sqlrelay DEPRECATED X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 04:33:42 -0000 >> Is this comment still true from the pr: >> Sqlrelay 0.44 requires newer rudiments 0.35 > Yes, It is. I just successfully built sqlrelay 0.44 against rudiments 0.35 >> If so, I am building what the patch is now, however the portstree does >> have rudiments 0.35, now. > Looks like I have missed this update while submitting PR. > The patch to update sqlrelay to 0.44 is still trivial > http://pastebin.com/gAAnguwE > > -- > Mikhail >> I am taking care of this now, and can get it updated soon. >> >> -jgh >> >> > > Committed! -jgh From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 14 05:13:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61CA106564A for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 05:13:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE908FC14 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 05:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id q3E5D7Ao053082 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 13 Apr 2012 22:13:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.14.2/Submit) with UUCP id q3E5D7Or053081; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 22:13:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA11771; Fri, 13 Apr 12 22:00:50 PDT Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 05:00:34 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: kob6558@gmail.com Message-Id: <4f8966e2.OcinJeOK1WxrXm51%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <0E61DE82-499B-47EF-9EEA-F9F3EB166A0A@gmail.com> <866281334347264@web24.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: annulen@yandex.ru, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, nacho319@gmail.com Subject: Re: port variants X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 05:13:08 -0000 Kevin Oberman wrote: > While I think makefile-options is the way to go, I should also > point out that for the specific case of emacs and X11, it is > not used due to the very large differences. Other "variants" > are handled via options, but there are separate emacs and > emacs-nox11 ports. > ... > The port maintainer/developer has to make a call as to which > approach is more practical, but I suspect portmgr@ will press > for maximum use of makefile-options. One reason to use a slave port instead of an option is so that both configurations will be routinely build-tested, and corresponding packages made available. Any one port can have only one "default" configuration. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 14 13:57:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84B5106568A for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:57:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D418FC25 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:57:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE7A0621C06 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:57:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15B45621C03 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:57:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4F898235.1040701@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:57:09 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: doublechecking: repocopy X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:57:14 -0000 just doublechecking so I don't muck up cvs: repocopy. ircd-ratbox-devel is at 3.0.7 (the official release now) maintainer has asked for a repocopy. I have assigned the pr to portmgr, with state of 'open' (should it have been feedback?) once repocopy is done and assigned back to me, I do a cvs rm on irc/ircd-ratbox on my local box, then cp the -devel directory over to original. (including the CVS files?: rsync -av --delete irc/ircd-ratbox-devel/ irc/ircd-ratbox/ or without? rsync -avC --delete irc/ircd-ratbox-devel/ irc/ircd-ratbox/ then I make a MOVED entry? or not? and depending on if the maintainer wants to keep -devel or remove it, I cvs rm those files and edit ./irc/Makefile to remove -devel as well, right? all atomically so that pointyhat doesn't choke? INDEX build doesn't choke? or temporarly edit ./irc/Makefile to keep INDEX from building or not? set MFC days? or is that mostly for source code? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 14 14:05:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0781B1065672 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:05:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846B28FC0A for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wern13 with SMTP id n13so3319144wer.13 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:04:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=tsug1WNikSXGVhvuqnHR96WM2BtTtMz/L8GaDfGGaMg=; b=oNWd0INkhYvKicAinQlqOBF9grkBbmSLB/sHn/RzvDC8Jbk8N4WQlSRGXzCGdZEJdb faLP+IN7ILSfqp7kKMhA99WOmhSBMbpmc6kR1Dna1OQt1n1b/1TsKogjUVaEMJyHqNoz DRN9L5MUdaUzQ2YTyiu0zA3STMxtbE45nZZBc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=tsug1WNikSXGVhvuqnHR96WM2BtTtMz/L8GaDfGGaMg=; b=nioaRXhUPyqKi6Z+tEz1aZ5GL800jJB2Fb/fnX8tz8yV/Azu0e8Vw+75GoWO39d0Zu HT9F4HFRZc4ELED0nbyoSJJ4goS2k7XJMAhBxCsklU6fGxZtWzsv8xemipWa+/A+Y1ey 6ZE1ZyEHWJ48pUEMUiqSFN+3K9Lk9fnYl0RqwbbPZD+RVzZAYAVDJcTCvHzLCLG6OAHe JQ6bFmzQlXjjKuFJ7/BzXs6dhmNsCD/ldZVTp0qGGyI1XNEJT1FYCmuhZUVX72UgRLZB rTx6mJj28qtL92tjp1EDiW5qa0HD64gNOtcNHXbPpyxWw5ly07oYXkXgBp/1JmQdxajk Em1w== Received: by 10.180.91.165 with SMTP id cf5mr4464329wib.2.1334412297791; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:04:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.63.4 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:04:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F898235.1040701@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F898235.1040701@FreeBSD.org> From: Eitan Adler Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:04:27 -0400 Message-ID: To: Michael Scheidell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkowjE3ddEWhUIJ919nd4Cpa1hO74FfPrkoM0TieYuZRieTVPkN7+IwT4PL4z/4IoEVcbyd Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: doublechecking: repocopy X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:05:00 -0000 On 14 April 2012 09:57, Michael Scheidell wrote: > just doublechecking so I don't muck up cvs: > > repocopy. > ircd-ratbox-devel is at 3.0.7 (the official release now) > maintainer has asked for a repocopy. > I have assigned the pr to portmgr, with state of 'open' (should it have been > feedback?) the state should be 'repocopy' > once repocopy is done and assigned back to me, I do a cvs rm on > irc/ircd-ratbox on my local box, then cp the -devel directory over to > original. The repocopy is the copy action. Once it is done there will be identical copies of files in the tree. Only one port will be connected to the build - the one which was originally connected. At this point you can do what you want with the files. You can delete the old copy, change the new copy and connect it, add a MOVED entry, or anything else that you would normally do. > set MFC days? or is that mostly for source code? MFC only applies to src because of the branching model. -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 14 14:51:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB10106566C; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:51:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80DE98FC1C; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:51:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so3911221bkc.13 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:51:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Lsl+wHiizEkJqnQm6rnT/MK6RJqtiW1IMx6EIhnpOQA=; b=hnbC4Wf+yp4T2wHac/ZKny3Dh7hR2ycXjtN5Z4QdyxZV6bq+xVSL8zxHD2ITKbnCAR UimKbDzH3Ks77Wb0ZELERbTC8//sIOwwDEuC59HIgWXS+FgjHS71VmwqaqBfdeUn6W2m iVe/wRDeM5zJbY4yGCebG1YrEyib+mHP52tLFA0ECTOlHJAWj6PFO5kUYXPFZKm8nTrM 40NKe6QXCgPnHkCh7oLDmbUh0UkWflQBVrfspzNgIJqP0So5Srt0yrhg/7PT0L7zJfYy Qok4TA7xG6+AyTBx4r708GANzWFwj77033IJ1N9GvvCiKeGdWYe/P1+ThbctbPX/8SKj pkLQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.12.10 with SMTP id v10mr1519282bkv.1.1334415079152; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:51:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:51:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F898235.1040701@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F898235.1040701@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:51:18 +0100 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Michael Scheidell , Moggie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: doublechecking: repocopy X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:51:26 -0000 On 14 Apr 2012 14:57, "Michael Scheidell" wrote: > > just doublechecking so I don't muck up cvs: > > repocopy. > ircd-ratbox-devel is at 3.0.7 (the official release now) > maintainer has asked for a repocopy. > I have assigned the pr to portmgr, with state of 'open' (should it have been feedback?) > > once repocopy is done and assigned back to me, I do a cvs rm on irc/ircd-ratbox on my local box, then cp the -devel directory over to original. > (including the CVS files?: > > rsync -av --delete irc/ircd-ratbox-devel/ irc/ircd-ratbox/ > > or without? > > rsync -avC --delete irc/ircd-ratbox-devel/ irc/ircd-ratbox/ > > then I make a MOVED entry? or not? > > and depending on if the maintainer wants to keep -devel or remove it, I cvs rm those files and edit ./irc/Makefile to remove -devel as well, right? > > all atomically so that pointyhat doesn't choke? INDEX build doesn't choke? or temporarly edit ./irc/Makefile to keep INDEX from building or not? > > set MFC days? or is that mostly for source code? > No repocopy required or permitted; if ircd-ratbox exists then a repocopy over it will lose history. Grab the PR back and just commit the new files in place. By the way, 'state' should be 'repocopy'. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 14 14:56:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A101065670 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:56:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44DD78FC1B for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC61621C06; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:56:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A39D5621C03; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:56:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4F898FFE.3090009@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:55:58 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4F898235.1040701@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Moggie , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: doublechecking: repocopy X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:56:07 -0000 On 4/14/12 10:51 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > > Grab the PR back and just commit the new files in place. > than it loses history of the -devel branch. I guess you can't keep it all.. PR taken back. Will think about it a little more. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 14 14:57:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747FD106566C for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:57:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426068FC1B for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:57:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7114AD23C04; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:57:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90109D23C03; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:57:35 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4F89905C.70508@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:57:32 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4F898235.1040701@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: doublechecking: repocopy X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:57:37 -0000 On 4/14/12 10:51 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > > Grab the PR back and just commit the new files in place. > and I am going to want to do something similar to p5-Mail-SpamAssassin. repocopy to -devel (isn't one yet), add ../mail/Makefile entry. edit/test/fix -devel for a while then copy it back over to p5-Mail-SpamAssassin/ rm -devel entry in Makefile put a 'MOVED' entry to document removal of -devel. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 14 16:09:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332661065673; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:09:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from moggie@elasticmind.net) Received: from mail.axonbirch.com (mail.axonbirch.com [IPv6:2001:67c:26e8:5::71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90768FC12; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:09:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.75] (host86-176-167-244.range86-176.btcentralplus.com [86.176.167.244]) by mail.axonbirch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C820BF3BC; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 17:09:20 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4F89A165.6050204@elasticmind.net> Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 17:10:13 +0100 From: Moggie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4F898235.1040701@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-AxonBirch-MailScanner-Information: contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details X-AxonBirch-MailScanner-ID: 7C820BF3BC.A3F8F X-AxonBirch-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-AxonBirch-MailScanner-From: moggie@elasticmind.net X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Michael Scheidell Subject: Re: doublechecking: repocopy X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:09:37 -0000 On 14/04/2012 15:51, Chris Rees wrote: > > > On 14 Apr 2012 14:57, "Michael Scheidell" > wrote: > > > > just doublechecking so I don't muck up cvs: > > > > repocopy. > > ircd-ratbox-devel is at 3.0.7 (the official release now) > > maintainer has asked for a repocopy. > > I have assigned the pr to portmgr, with state of 'open' (should it > have been feedback?) > > > > once repocopy is done and assigned back to me, I do a cvs rm on > irc/ircd-ratbox on my local box, then cp the -devel directory over to > original. > > (including the CVS files?: > > > > rsync -av --delete irc/ircd-ratbox-devel/ irc/ircd-ratbox/ > > > > or without? > > > > rsync -avC --delete irc/ircd-ratbox-devel/ irc/ircd-ratbox/ > > > > then I make a MOVED entry? or not? > > > > and depending on if the maintainer wants to keep -devel or remove > it, I cvs rm those files and edit ./irc/Makefile to remove -devel as > well, right? > > > > all atomically so that pointyhat doesn't choke? INDEX build doesn't > choke? or temporarly edit ./irc/Makefile to keep INDEX from building > or not? > > > > set MFC days? or is that mostly for source code? > > > > No repocopy required or permitted; if ircd-ratbox exists then a > repocopy over it will lose history. > > Grab the PR back and just commit the new files in place. > > By the way, 'state' should be 'repocopy'. > > Chris > Sorry, I used bad terminology... At the time I thought repocopy was a euphemism for "updating or syncing one port's current files with another", but have come to understand that it is certainly not. I definitely don't wish for the ports to be repocopied, sorry for the confusion! To clarify; the "-devel" release of ircd-ratbox is now considered stable, meaning there is currently no development version available. I've updated irc/ircd-ratbox-devel to the most recent release and meant to ask if the two ports could please be synchronised, such that the deprecated (old "stable") version of the port is updated to the current release branch (by copying irc/ircd-ratbox-devel files over irc/ircd-ratbox and then applying the supplied patch). Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 14 16:37:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB6B106564A for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:37:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2F68FC08 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so3953288bkc.13 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:37:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=D09aDfn8ZlXGp5jJE/ok2+q/pcy6L/n5voo5VBcY+xU=; b=WrG8is9NdFw2Ob//ZAjhrCDlWynKjkfXnBfuWFbBxbXG+dgGkVQQfgeAXRN0kE0QHm YOUeCIZ8LevQRXoBh8qkXaZqDA7+VST0RAwosvb8Fk+2QTCxh7ufI3mK59vFAe/C1qQv Sf5U85ilYWwx/IRPIELWKKjPXDcpZVhwvY7YO5HGRcsufo3OrNVS3PaWNJYhov6cXcVA V0PBhL6u+IckXPiQViPM+FExvZDIiTnn8+Bam10JCB28g0Bbs7R6+POPTSAXzvRbJ+pX IKzhen/FRODAvxsx2kG7HaAKHXAzjB4jtDxJq5H1j/Lh1DMPdRgvfYI7ChLPHxGRCShO E63A== Received: by 10.204.156.69 with SMTP id v5mr1764384bkw.5.1334421454629; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:37:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:37:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <0E61DE82-499B-47EF-9EEA-F9F3EB166A0A@gmail.com> <866281334347264@web24.yandex.ru> From: Chris Rees Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 17:37:04 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 06wsMcxXzBJ4jqBCljDhOS16oHo Message-ID: To: Kevin Oberman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , Konstantin Tokarev , Chris Inacio Subject: Re: port variants X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:37:36 -0000 On 13 April 2012 23:38, Kevin Oberman wrote: > 2012/4/13 Konstantin Tokarev : >> 13.04.2012, 23:55, "Chris Inacio" : >>> On Apr 13, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: >>> >>>> =A0On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Chris Inacio = wrote: >>>>> =A0I was recently asked to do some FreeBSD ports support work. =A0I m= ostly use a >>>>> =A0Mac and the MacPorts system. =A0MacPorts has the concept of a vari= ant for a >>>>> =A0port, but I can't find the analogue in the FreeBSD system. >>>>> >>>>> =A0Does the FreeBSD ports system have the concept of a variant? =A0If= so, can >>>>> =A0someone point me in the right direction on how to create one? >>>> =A0Describing what a "variant" is, how it works in MacPorts, and what = you >>>> =A0are trying to do would help a lot. =A0:) >>>> >>>> =A0The closest guess I could make would be "slave port", but I don't >>>> =A0think that works the same way. >>> >>> Sorry, you're right. >>> >>> For example, a port of say Emacs could have a variant of X11. >>> >>> So Emacs or Emacs+X11. >>> >>> The X11 variant would (somewhat obviously) include building regular Ema= cs but also the X11 toolbar etc. while Emacs wouldn't include any X11 featu= res (& dependencies). >>> >>> On the Mac, we can build universal binaries (PowerPC, ia32, and x86_64)= , at the cost of disk space. So we can build almost any package with the +u= niversal variant. >>> >>> Is that a reasonable explanation? >> >> Seems like you need makefile options: >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-options.ht= ml > > While I think makefile-options is the way to go, I should also point > out that for the specific case of emacs and X11, it is not used due to > the very large differences. Other "variants" are handled via options, > but there are separate emacs and emacs-nox11 ports. > > Most obviously, all of the emacs options are X11 related and there is > no way that I know to have two sets of options with one list dependent > on the other. If there are only a coupe of cases of this, it may be > noted on the options like: > THREADS =A0 =A0 =A0 " Build with thread support" > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0On \ > FOO =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0"Foo support (requires THREADS)" > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 OFF \ > > The port maintainer/developer has to make a call as to which approach > is more practical, but I suspect portmgr@ will press for maximum use > of makefile-options. It's unusual for portmgr to intervene in individual ports-- if the maintainer takes the trouble to make test and support OPTIONS, then great, but it's by no means mandatory. It's better to be slightly less flexible than have loads of OPTIONS which break other ports in subtle ways. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 14 16:52:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10795106564A; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:52:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crees@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81F68FC14; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:52:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3EGqOqY079662; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:52:24 GMT (envelope-from crees@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from crees@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q3EGqOLZ079658; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:52:24 GMT (envelope-from crees) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:52:24 GMT Message-Id: <201204141652.q3EGqOLZ079658@freefall.freebsd.org> To: crees@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: crees@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: bin/162681: pkg_add(1): new installer does not add doc packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:52:25 -0000 Synopsis: pkg_add(1): new installer does not add doc packages Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->freebsd-ports-bugs Responsible-Changed-By: crees Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Apr 14 16:52:16 UTC 2012 Responsible-Changed-Why: Canonicalise assignment. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=162681 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 14 22:15:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CAC106566B for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:15:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 5u623l20@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC748FC14 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so3877537vbm.13 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:15:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=KMunR3cc6o/Ehon4M1kZElHIdAznPBLpnkh5yugf/7U=; b=Ly/yV1MKU8rda96z28IEAUwd2gPBZ2R6q+u/mUYYeG5a+tWfb9xxLKggHmvSDsHfKJ e6UkOtsfPJ1vvyJaQH0mtJba9G3wtxj5Fq/zKE2PapNYXrL4HJfNvVa9zmAZZibDcxqz UB9cNO1VA+F509TfpYxYJ4XfEHnJqJLGNszBDCDiH7XxsSFwE982omw5kJKmGFRy6tny mo/q8eDg6Mf+KEAGZqZPuzg87gzTUMpL8xdPn9hRAt9R9BH+VyDrrbnQ+h2Q4jmrcURa 7I+QVzaKRsvd/MMIm9zd8fqo13Mi6Oba4P4oED+9KkD0W7bH6pGAnTwH8UYipL+anj2M zhNA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.90.175 with SMTP id bx15mr2697188vdb.31.1334441735928; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:15:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.177.193 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:15:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 04:15:35 +0600 Message-ID: From: Muhammad Moinur Rahman <5u623l20@gmail.com> To: paul+usenet@w6yx.stanford.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mason 2 - anyone updating? (www/p5-HTML-Mason) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:15:37 -0000 I have submitted a PR for Mason 2. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/166952 Regards, Muhammad On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Muhammad Moinur Rahman <5u623l20@gmail.com>wrote: > Sorry to disappoint you but one of it's pre-requisites is not yet in the > Ports Tree yet. However I have submitted a PR for the pre-requisite itself. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166591 > > As soon as this one gets committed I will submit the PR for Mason 2. > > Happy porting. > > Regards, > Muhammad > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Muhammad Moinur Rahman <5u623l20@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> I hope to submit a PR sometimes tonight. >> >> Regards, >> Muhammad >> >> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:00 PM, G. Paul Ziemba < >> pz-freebsd-ports@ziemba.us> wrote: >> >>> 5u623l20@gmail.com (Muhammad Moinur Rahman) writes: >>> >>> >Can you give any link towards 2.X branch? Ports tree has 1.45 while CPAN >>> >has 1.48. >>> >>> http://search.cpan.org/~jswartz/Mason-2.17/ >>> -- >>> G. Paul Ziemba >>> FreeBSD unix: >>> 1:56AM up 42 days, 10:49, 29 users, load averages: 0.21, 0.19, 0.17 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 14 23:04:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B10E1065672 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 23:04:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@dataix.net) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16258FC14 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 23:04:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so7551872iah.13 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:04:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dataix.net; s=rsa; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition; bh=PVnK5gDn5R4SG9B4DB+uIecT8lxzrXac/FznmRKiyAE=; b=FaJ7Qp+gKePcrBy9MB/7lHQxuFcbRsdiS1Bo9r6AjtJVEYQaDP2mXbkXCHLc1XiL0j MC7Cf0Jtx5xzi2cyL5yND0F3vHdIaerrCL+M0t5kvNEGkwwLd1D/ndfvim3PX2zitWWd M23OkhroPNPCXl0DhBkUW1s2taxfe1WOvFAeI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:x-gm-message-state; bh=PVnK5gDn5R4SG9B4DB+uIecT8lxzrXac/FznmRKiyAE=; b=YOZPd+Hk6G1VKlzqBv4fsaIipQe1bqnjkwF9sChXL65Q++M2c4wmPIPWjMhnLUoi2s a6/+D4ee7VrO+ttTF6BN115AU7RivWb9p3qdchZysvy9DnA6yM2tQ+MebocZ9sb/1tUh 8/fJD+ONkKjmqCBqtje1Cn/rXHnkGbPM/QEh9xhQArDpJhFA6GBnqAvIFRrUakLxjExZ 826mKUdIs8ZWwYwvfarJpkFwenjXd2apYUsSrrnExWpdJdmxJFFMSNd4x5XLNNYuqAsE wKdqb4lnU9/5rmw59dMdVMqhSqMHotpTQqalq/ZfiQYDbHHil2ue0r5O7qO+uzW3wVE+ JShw== Received: by 10.50.158.166 with SMTP id wv6mr2018454igb.39.1334444697427; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:04:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (adsl-108-195-136-95.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net. [108.195.136.95]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id vq7sm9795379igb.16.2012.04.14.16.04.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:04:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3EN4tiH013475 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 14 Apr 2012 19:04:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Received: (from jhellenthal@localhost) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q3EN4ruf013474; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 19:04:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 19:04:53 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal To: ohauer@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20120414230453.GA13461@DataIX.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3" Content-Disposition: inline X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm0vWahRHc/ttjQXCseu6N8f6TUOCQ4MzNpY5DZQislv0iRIWS35zJAQhPIqjvKQI/8pSv8 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: security/pulledpork & p5-Switch with perl 5.14.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 23:04:58 -0000 --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Switch's use in perl has been deprecated for some time now. On one hand pulledpork has made use of p5-Switch but yet does not require it as a runtime dependancy. Could you update the port to require lang/p5-Switch please ? Thanks --=20 ;s =3D; --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPigKVAAoJEBSh2Dr1DU7WggMIAJZW0ZcqI4gRqOBQT2WkNlNl qVMbYte2eMpQp8fWZeQ+15bSVjw5SrY2CuOIvtGgImEmEP/A0SpGOB7zHbiGp8sr 4gstcMo2e2dLzWGF4T4xMoY+IZtSdbmPOFx165rbmFkA2Fn3dHRIRoMV7gWN54Kh 8gFasDms1o6GY4oOlrpcDczCLhz0EcJM/k7NV97/gcQO/x1VnrUXkjdLKqavm/Dz FfdWomWMPvTI8yB/Ng4ayyahArIfAh+ppnc0aljzSVRgQLPjY3/A4+HNgvlKfVge 0qA+eMq11Ygd0jD2nt9CTLADfz2FKRA4/onZJa8GtUl+JEwcxZdE8On8DeluUxc= =fk0h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3--