From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 00:54:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF83106564A; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 00:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4DFB8FC18; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 00:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5A0sgT0072128; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 18:54:42 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q5A0sg9P072125; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 18:54:42 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 18:54:42 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: <4FD37B40.2030500@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <201206020012.q520CEcf057568@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120602004230.GA14487@in-addr.com> <201206040224.q542OBqk085897@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604043233.GB32597@lonesome.com> <201206040841.q548fVHa091169@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <201206041841.q54IfUow001060@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604191343.GF10783@isuckatdomains.isuckatdomains.net> <201206041932.q54JWONA001600@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FCDA15C.2000700@digsys.bg> <201206061859.q56IxvLx045828@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FCFC846.5050508@FreeBSD.org> <201206070527.q575R1sX052893@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FD37B40.2030500@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 09 Jun 2012 18:54:42 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Dave Hayes , FreeBSD ports list Subject: Re: Documenting 'make config' options X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 00:54:44 -0000 On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, Doug Barton wrote: > On 06/06/2012 22:27, Dave Hayes wrote: >> Personally, a 'pkg-options-descr' text file would suit me just fine. > > For those on -ports, the context is, "How do we provide more information > about what the various options mean?" This idea seems reasonable to me, > what do others think? The user needs to know what the options mean when they appear, and having to go look them up in another file is just another hassle. Difficult to do in some situations, too. Better to show them when the user scrolls to that option. Here's what I suggested in -stable: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-June/068187.html No new files, only one copy of the descriptions so they don't get out of sync. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 00:58:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75702106566C for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 00:58:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1431519A7; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 00:58:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FD3F149.10602@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 17:58:49 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block References: <201206020012.q520CEcf057568@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120602004230.GA14487@in-addr.com> <201206040224.q542OBqk085897@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604043233.GB32597@lonesome.com> <201206040841.q548fVHa091169@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <201206041841.q54IfUow001060@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604191343.GF10783@isuckatdomains.isuckatdomains.net> <201206041932.q54JWONA001600@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FCDA15C.2000700@digsys.bg> <201206061859.q56IxvLx045828@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FCFC846.5050508@FreeBSD.org> <201206070527.q575R1sX052893@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FD37B40.2030500@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dave Hayes , FreeBSD ports list Subject: Re: Documenting 'make config' options X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 00:58:50 -0000 On 06/09/2012 17:54, Warren Block wrote: > On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, Doug Barton wrote: > >> On 06/06/2012 22:27, Dave Hayes wrote: >>> Personally, a 'pkg-options-descr' text file would suit me just fine. >> >> For those on -ports, the context is, "How do we provide more information >> about what the various options mean?" This idea seems reasonable to me, >> what do others think? > > The user needs to know what the options mean when they appear, and > having to go look them up in another file is just another hassle. > Difficult to do in some situations, too. Better to show them when the > user scrolls to that option. Here's what I suggested in -stable: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-June/068187.html > > No new files, only one copy of the descriptions so they don't get out of > sync. That's a nice idea, how do you make it work with dialog? -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 01:10:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345A5106564A; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 01:10:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA888FC0C; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 01:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5A1A9iZ072218; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 19:10:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q5A1A9lX072215; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 19:10:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 19:10:09 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: <4FD3F149.10602@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <201206020012.q520CEcf057568@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120602004230.GA14487@in-addr.com> <201206040224.q542OBqk085897@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604043233.GB32597@lonesome.com> <201206040841.q548fVHa091169@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <201206041841.q54IfUow001060@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604191343.GF10783@isuckatdomains.isuckatdomains.net> <201206041932.q54JWONA001600@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FCDA15C.2000700@digsys.bg> <201206061859.q56IxvLx045828@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FCFC846.5050508@FreeBSD.org> <201206070527.q575R1sX052893@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FD37B40.2030500@FreeBSD.org> <4FD3F149.10602@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 09 Jun 2012 19:10:10 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Dave Hayes , FreeBSD ports list Subject: Re: Documenting 'make config' options X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 01:10:11 -0000 On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, Doug Barton wrote: > On 06/09/2012 17:54, Warren Block wrote: >> On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, Doug Barton wrote: >> >>> On 06/06/2012 22:27, Dave Hayes wrote: >>>> Personally, a 'pkg-options-descr' text file would suit me just fine. >>> >>> For those on -ports, the context is, "How do we provide more information >>> about what the various options mean?" This idea seems reasonable to me, >>> what do others think? >> >> The user needs to know what the options mean when they appear, and >> having to go look them up in another file is just another hassle. >> Difficult to do in some situations, too. Better to show them when the >> user scrolls to that option. Here's what I suggested in -stable: >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-June/068187.html >> >> No new files, only one copy of the descriptions so they don't get out of >> sync. > > That's a nice idea, how do you make it work with dialog? No idea, this is still the design phase. :) Actually, a message I now can't find suggested that dialog may be able to do it unchanged. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 02:02:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1F91065670 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:02:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9F814E560; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:02:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FD40029.2000807@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 19:02:17 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block References: <201206020012.q520CEcf057568@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120602004230.GA14487@in-addr.com> <201206040224.q542OBqk085897@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604043233.GB32597@lonesome.com> <201206040841.q548fVHa091169@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <201206041841.q54IfUow001060@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604191343.GF10783@isuckatdomains.isuckatdomains.net> <201206041932.q54JWONA001600@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FCDA15C.2000700@digsys.bg> <201206061859.q56IxvLx045828@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FCFC846.5050508@FreeBSD.org> <201206070527.q575R1sX052893@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FD37B40.2030500@FreeBSD.org> <4FD3F149.10602@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dave Hayes , FreeBSD ports list Subject: Re: Documenting 'make config' options X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:02:18 -0000 On 06/09/2012 18:10, Warren Block wrote: >> That's a nice idea, how do you make it work with dialog? > > No idea, this is still the design phase. :) Actually, a message I now > can't find suggested that dialog may be able to do it unchanged. We have a solution that unquestionably will work, now. It's not ideal from a UI standpoint, but it's better than the $nothing that we have now. I would not want to see us wait around for something that may or may not happen in the future. That said, if we can make this work with dialog now, and someone is willing to put the work in to make it happen, then sure, that's a better plan. But let's not let perfect be the enemy of good. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 02:47:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80806106566B; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:47:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FDC158BED; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:47:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FD40AD6.1040608@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 19:47:50 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: miwi@FreeBSD.org References: <20120607203753.2466c63a.miwi@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120607203753.2466c63a.miwi@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Xorg 7.7 ready for testing! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:47:51 -0000 I removed -current since it's out of scope for this. Also, I want to say up front that I'm excited to have the new version available. :) On 06/07/2012 05:37, Martin Wilke wrote: [...] > What I'm trying to say is, I would love to see > the newer xorg released as the default version, but i know this will > break a lot of old hardware. The thing is, when we want to try to > become a Modern Operating System, I dont see any other way to make the > new xorg as default but to give Users the chance to compile the old > xorg with a flag like WITH_OLD_XORG. Agreed, we have to continue supporting the current Xorg alongside the new one. No reason not to drop the oldest one though. If we can swing package support for 7.5 that would be great, we probably only need it for i386 and amd64. You might want to think about having a WITH_XORG flag that takes values of 75 or 77; and implies the right version of mesa. This is probably also a good time to think about changing the naming to be xorg77 and xorg75, rather than just plain xorg. That way the next time we have to go through this users who are at 77 can do the upgrade to what will then be the newer version gracefully. Think php here. > A small merge script to merge the svn checkout into the real portstree > can be found here: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/xorg/xorgmerge This is a good example of where having a projects branch in the new svn ports repo would be really useful. :) I think it's great that you're providing some tools that people can use to test this, but having to redo the patch every time I update my ports tree doesn't really appeal to me. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 03:03:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4780C1065674; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 03:03:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BA3153BCD; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 03:02:57 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FD40E60.50405@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 20:02:56 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Matuska X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD ports list Subject: Imagemagick: FAIL, now in Magick++/demo/analyze.sh X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 03:03:06 -0000 The new version fails in a new location, even with the default options. -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 03:28:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 423F8106566C; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 03:28:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24431161D97; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 03:27:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FD4140F.4010209@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 20:27:11 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rotkap@gmx.de References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Heino Tiedemann , gerald@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: firefox 13.0,1 needs lang/gcc46 -- to RUN?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 03:28:57 -0000 On 06/06/2012 12:18, Heino Tiedemann wrote: > Hi, > > > > Why this ports needs his compiler to RUN?! > > > firefox 13.0,1 It's very common for binaries built with gcc to link to libgcc, and/or libstdc++: ldd firefox-bin | grep gcc libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/gcc46/libstdc++.so.6 (0x802b19000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/gcc46/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x8033a5000) In an ideal world, we would have separate packages for the runtime libs and the build tools so that packages could be more portable, but I would imagine that would be a lot of work. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 05:02:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D52106566C; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 05:02:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07A58FC0A; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 05:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5A52tuY073037; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 23:02:55 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q5A52tlV073034; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 23:02:55 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 23:02:55 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201206020012.q520CEcf057568@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120602004230.GA14487@in-addr.com> <201206040224.q542OBqk085897@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604043233.GB32597@lonesome.com> <201206040841.q548fVHa091169@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <201206041841.q54IfUow001060@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604191343.GF10783@isuckatdomains.isuckatdomains.net> <201206041932.q54JWONA001600@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FCDA15C.2000700@digsys.bg> <201206061859.q56IxvLx045828@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FCFC846.5050508@FreeBSD.org> <201206070527.q575R1sX052893@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FD37B40.2030500@FreeBSD.org> <4FD3F149.10602@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 09 Jun 2012 23:02:55 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Dave Hayes , FreeBSD ports list Subject: Re: Documenting 'make config' options X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 05:02:57 -0000 On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, Warren Block wrote: > On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, Doug Barton wrote: > >> On 06/09/2012 17:54, Warren Block wrote: >>> On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, Doug Barton wrote: >>> >>>> On 06/06/2012 22:27, Dave Hayes wrote: >>>>> Personally, a 'pkg-options-descr' text file would suit me just fine. >>>> >>>> For those on -ports, the context is, "How do we provide more information >>>> about what the various options mean?" This idea seems reasonable to me, >>>> what do others think? >>> >>> The user needs to know what the options mean when they appear, and >>> having to go look them up in another file is just another hassle. >>> Difficult to do in some situations, too. Better to show them when the >>> user scrolls to that option. Here's what I suggested in -stable: >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-June/068187.html >>> >>> No new files, only one copy of the descriptions so they don't get out of >>> sync. >> >> That's a nice idea, how do you make it work with dialog? > > No idea, this is still the design phase. :) Actually, a message I now can't > find suggested that dialog may be able to do it unchanged. Followup: dialog --item-help \ --checklist "Contrived options description example" 21 70 15 \ "ABC" "Enable ABC encapsulation of convoluted insoluble ..." "on" \ "variations when the complementary quantum reversal feature is undesirable" \ "DOCS" "Build and install documentation" "on" "" \ "XYZ" "Enabling XYZ sets compiler go-fast stripes, defeats ...," "off" \ "all safeguards, and begins a wholesale, awesome, breathtaking data mangling" \ "NLS" "Native Language Support via gettext utilities" "on" "" Now some code is needed to break descriptions too long to fit in the standard option box (preferably on spaces), right-justify "..." or maybe "+" at the end to show the line is continued, and integrate that with bsd.port.mk. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 07:38:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A66106566B; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 07:38:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from fsm2.ukr.net (fsm2.ukr.net [195.214.192.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A038FC0C; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 07:38:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=fsm; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=WruAqsFsmd2DuUiMq8ixsOv10rFfvF7oPuZCgh+Z64I=; b=AZPYfBH987Ef6qvfpul3t3FWZqBnsNneU995Hk36s8moTW0/G5+8EmpKyZZXLrW0/kArdiZwaOvopE2Z1cI2sU3pc+J+xaBUoJdTg4J3rWRmX9gopRchhUyj5fRiKnUQmqNeT0fdGA+/psoEjN56WjXhvn19I2o2W/t7pu+22Yk=; Received: from [178.137.138.140] (helo=nonamehost.) by fsm2.ukr.net with esmtpsa ID 1SdcjN-000Kf0-Gt ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:38:37 +0300 Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:38:36 +0300 From: Ivan Klymenko To: miwi@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20120610103836.01758adc@nonamehost.> In-Reply-To: <20120607203753.2466c63a.miwi@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120607203753.2466c63a.miwi@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEWpqak/Pz/i4uIfHx8GBwZwcHAQEBA6o92AAAACHElEQVQ4jWWUTY7bMAyF6QzUPSEoa8PFHEBgqwuM4bVVg7MvZOj+R+ijpMTpjIwgkT7z75EKrdfattpXERG6zqvUOtAr2LCRYfEKcB4l/Q+2cc6XjQH7hv+2YZYreIk5nevZEPvuzUzptizHLzgDMnC5Wpbl7ewJlOEqlQF+DlCjgVLki0WV6FMDMsBxjlJiQulIznwZ+DxHiQyDyIg0wN3Oo6o6ZQ5s5AIfar+W2Wlmz+kCcb8tg6j3voMEwNrBQk69dDBDqw/urpqJH+m+Q6u/4QnoAeYpnUXC/s1iup9rhCd6xMgAqdDyAyFegbKkVAHeLCcOulPLawaoUIDos4M88iLNrVkU7uu5ccTDO6naJzWLum51C6Yb7y4HKKbdArLWir0PBiS8glJRBZHeyHl7J9lENpAC6qT9NlNG4u5hsVYDyJP6mlJJtY3oVju4WSUzHal1sDU17NASoBWSk40J2eBLBJhYrVmzC5gVALGpNIAiQgN6eGstOp9Oa6zFbbLTISYi28BGZDRUJKWeroECkCEkzXjUtbmmaKMfAx2RfbT69/cO+tgHcmx6AfyZOmj3NDIah0F0GB66d4CrdIoplNFFGHSpSheRxbo0W4S8azNItEoMWbw3uXAeJgCrmX5joz7CGXqSg6PcryEhnFr/C1C2ntPxBOYbdwY+8dO3+wZJyFlbMX9s8zNnvp/tLwAv03NB4j3HVpn8Awwm+GrlP6MVAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, x11@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Xorg 7.7 ready for testing! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 07:38:45 -0000 =D0=92 Thu, 7 Jun 2012 20:37:53 +0800 Martin Wilke =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > Hi Fans, >=20 > The FreeBSD Xorg Team is pleased to announce Xorg 7.7 Release. We are > very happy to be able to Call for testing shortly after the Xorg team > annouced 7.7 release. This CFT is also open for discussion on how we > should move forward with xorg release as we are facing some issues and > we would like to ask for your opinion. Right now we have 2 existing > xorg versions in our Ports Tree. The situation is quite bad due to our > poor graphic card support. That means we do not have much choice but > to take it as how it is now. But with regards to mesa support, we > have to face some new challanges. >=20 > With the new mesa 8.0 release, accelerated support for a number of > older graphic cards was dropped. At the moment we are not sure how to > deal with that.We are thinking of just replacing mesa 7.11 with 8.0 or > making a new flag like WITH_MESA=3D 7.11.2 / 8.0 in combination with > WITH_NEW_XORG, and let the mesa 7.6.1 set as default together with the > old xorg version. Obviosly the latter option make the already complex > situation more complex. The problem is, users, especially the new > ones can easily get confused with it. Another issue is, the > packages.We can't deliver a package set with the new Xorg releases. > This means users with new hardware will have to compile everything by > themselves. Though I'm totally fine with compiling, not everyone has > the CPU power to compile everything. What I'm trying to say is, I > would love to see the newer xorg released as the default version, but > i know this will break a lot of old hardware. The thing is, when we > want to try to become a Modern Operating System, I dont see any other > way to make the new xorg as default but to give Users the chance to > compile the old xorg with a flag like WITH_OLD_XORG. >=20 > Some notes regarding KMS support: > KMS Support has been completely migrated to FreeBSD 10. The MFC to 9 > will come soon, that means so long its not MFC'd to 9-Stable, users > need to get the latest patch from our x11 mailing list. >=20 > This testing includes > * libdrm 2.4.34 (including KMS support) > * mesa 8.0.3 > * full Xorg 7.7 release Change log > http://www.x.org/releases/X11R7.7/changelog.html >=20 > Checkout Xorg Development Repo: > You will need to install devel/subversion in order to checkout the > xorg repo. Next, you will need to add WITH_NEW_XORG=3Dyes in > your /etc/make.conf if you want to try out the new Xorg and mesa. Note > that if you are not qualified for the KMS patch, you shouldn=E2=80=99t use > WITH_NEW_XORG=3Dyes because the old intel driver doesn=E2=80=99t build wi= th the > new X server. If you are qualified, you should also set WITH_KMS=3Dyes > in /etc/make.conf. Nvidia and ATI users should set WITH_NEW_XORG=3Dyes. >=20 > svn co https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/ports/trunk >=20 > A small merge script to merge the svn checkout into the real portstree > can be found here: >=20 > http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/xorg/xorgmerge >=20 > The script is a modified version of the old kdemerge script. Please > set the KDEDIR variable to the path of your X.org ports. After > merging, run one of the following command, depending on which tool > you use to manage your installed packages. >=20 > portupgrade -af \* > portmaster -a >=20 >=20 > After installing these, you will have to rebuild all xf86-* ports. We > will bump all releated ports during the commit to the ports tree. >=20 > Roadmap: > Our current plan is to let the CFT running for a while, and see what > the outcome of the discussion above is. We hope to get a lot of > feedback to solve as many problems as possible. Also we are working on > the libglut to freeglut migration, this will definitely complete > before we import Xorg 7.7. So we still have enough time. We are > looking forward for your feedback. >=20 > - miwi on behalf of the FreeBSD X11 Team >=20 > PS: Please reply only to x11@ thanks. >=20 uname -a FreeBSD nonamehost 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r236313: Fri Jun 1= 20:20:31 EEST 2012 ivan@nonamehost:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/mk10 amd64 tree port updated three days ago port x11-servers/xorg-server build error gmake[4]: =D0=92=D1=8B=D1=85=D0=BE=D0=B4 =D0=B8=D0=B7 =D0=BA=D0=B0=D1=82=D0= =B0=D0=BB=D0=BE=D0=B3=D0=B0 `/usr/ports_build/usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-se= rver/work/xorg-server-1.12.2/hw/xfree86/man' gmake[4]: =D0=92=D1=85=D0=BE=D0=B4 =D0=B2 =D0=BA=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BB=D0= =BE=D0=B3 `/usr/ports_build/usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-server/work/xorg-ser= ver-1.12.2/hw/xfree86' CPP=3D'cpp' AWK=3D'gawk' /bin/sh ./sdksyms.sh ../.. -O2 -ftree-vectorize -m= fpmath=3Dsse -mssse3 -pipe -march=3Dcore2 -fno-strict-aliasing -DHAVE_DIX_C= ONFIG_H -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-declarations -Wformat=3D2 -Wstrict-= prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wbad-function-cast -Wold-= style-definition -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wunused -Wuninitialized -Ws= hadow -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-noreturn -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wredundant= -decls -Werror=3Dimplicit -Werror=3Dnonnull -Werror=3Dinit-self -Werror=3Dm= ain -Werror=3Dmissing-braces -Werror=3Dsequence-point -Werror=3Dreturn-type= -Werror=3Dtrigraphs -Werror=3Dwrite-strings -Werror=3Daddress -Werror=3Din= t-to-pointer-cast -Werror=3Dpointer-to-int-cast -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-s= trict-aliasing -D_BSD_SOURCE -DHAS_FCHOWN -DHAS_STICKY_DIR_BIT -D_THREAD_SA= FE -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/local/include/= freetype2 -I../../include -I../../include -I../../Xext -I../../composite = -I../../damageext -I../../xfixes -I../../Xi -I../../mi -I../../miext/sync -= I../../miext/shadow -I../../miext/damage -I../../render -I../../randr -I..= /../fb -fvisibility=3Dhidden -DHAVE_XORG_CONFIG_H -fvisibility=3Dhidden -I= /usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I../../hw/xfree86 -I../../hw/x= free86/include -I../../hw/xfree86/common -I../../hw/xfree86/os-support -I..= /../hw/xfree86/os-support/bus -I../../os -I./parser -I../../miext/cw -I./dd= c -I./i2c -I./modes -I./ramdac CC sdksyms.o In file included from ./modes/xf86Crtc.h:28, from sdksyms.c:84: ../../randr/randrstr.h:594: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'RRTransfor= mCompute' ../../randr/rrtransform.h:70: warning: previous declaration of 'RRTransform= Compute' was here In file included from ./modes/xf86Crtc.h:32, from sdksyms.c:84: ./modes/xf86Modes.h:43: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'xf86ModeHSync' ../../hw/xfree86/common/xf86.h:411: warning: previous declaration of 'xf86M= odeHSync' was here ./modes/xf86Modes.h:44: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'xf86ModeVRefre= sh' ../../hw/xfree86/common/xf86.h:413: warning: previous declaration of 'xf86M= odeVRefresh' was here ./modes/xf86Modes.h:53: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'xf86DuplicateM= ode' ../../hw/xfree86/common/xf86.h:419: warning: previous declaration of 'xf86D= uplicateMode' was here ./modes/xf86Modes.h:55: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'xf86DuplicateM= odes' ../../hw/xfree86/common/xf86.h:421: warning: previous declaration of 'xf86D= uplicateModes' was here ./modes/xf86Modes.h:56: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'xf86SetModeDef= aultName' ../../hw/xfree86/common/xf86.h:415: warning: previous declaration of 'xf86S= etModeDefaultName' was here ./modes/xf86Modes.h:57: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'xf86SetModeCrt= c' ../../hw/xfree86/common/xf86.h:417: warning: previous declaration of 'xf86S= etModeCrtc' was here ./modes/xf86Modes.h:59: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'xf86ModesEqual' ../../hw/xfree86/common/xf86.h:423: warning: previous declaration of 'xf86M= odesEqual' was here ./modes/xf86Modes.h:60: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'xf86PrintModel= ine' ../../hw/xfree86/common/xf86.h:425: warning: previous declaration of 'xf86P= rintModeline' was here ./modes/xf86Modes.h:62: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'xf86ModesAdd' ../../hw/xfree86/common/xf86.h:427: warning: previous declaration of 'xf86M= odesAdd' was here ./modes/xf86Modes.h:67: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'xf86CVTMode' ../../hw/xfree86/common/xf86.h:198: warning: previous declaration of 'xf86C= VTMode' was here In file included from sdksyms.c:92: ./ddc/xf86DDC.h:48: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'xf86DDCGetModes' ./modes/xf86Modes.h:64: warning: previous declaration of 'xf86DDCGetModes' = was here In file included from sdksyms.c:270: ../../include/dixevents.h:84: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'PostSynt= heticMotion' ../../include/input.h:476: warning: previous declaration of 'PostSyntheticM= otion' was here In file included from sdksyms.c:271: ../../include/dixfont.h:148: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'client_au= th_generation' /usr/local/include/X11/fonts/fontproto.h:52: warning: previous declaration = of 'client_auth_generation' was here ../../include/dixfont.h:150: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'DeleteFon= tClientID' /usr/local/include/X11/fonts/fontproto.h:59: warning: previous declaration = of 'DeleteFontClientID' was here ../../include/dixfont.h:152: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'GetClient= Resolutions' /usr/local/include/X11/fonts/font.h:149: warning: previous declaration of '= GetClientResolutions' was here ../../include/dixfont.h:154: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'GetDefaul= tPointSize' /usr/local/include/X11/fonts/fontproto.h:44: warning: previous declaration = of 'GetDefaultPointSize' was here ../../include/dixfont.h:156: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'GetNewFon= tClientID' /usr/local/include/X11/fonts/fontproto.h:60: warning: previous declaration = of 'GetNewFontClientID' was here ../../include/dixfont.h:159: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'init_fs_h= andlers' /usr/local/include/X11/fonts/fontproto.h:47: warning: previous declaration = of 'init_fs_handlers' was here ../../include/dixfont.h:175: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'RegisterF= PEFunctions' /usr/local/include/X11/fonts/fontproto.h:42: warning: previous declaration = of 'RegisterFPEFunctions' was here ../../include/dixfont.h:179: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'remove_fs= _handlers' /usr/local/include/X11/fonts/fontproto.h:50: warning: previous declaration = of 'remove_fs_handlers' was here ../../include/dixfont.h:181: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'StoreFont= ClientFont' /usr/local/include/X11/fonts/fontproto.h:61: warning: previous declaration = of 'StoreFontClientFont' was here sdksyms.c:399: warning: cast discards qualifiers from pointer target type sdksyms.c:453: warning: cast discards qualifiers from pointer target type sdksyms.c:748: warning: cast discards qualifiers from pointer target type sdksyms.c:1002: warning: cast discards qualifiers from pointer target type sdksyms.c:1026: warning: cast discards qualifiers from pointer target type sdksyms.c:1123: warning: cast discards qualifiers from pointer target type sdksyms.c:1124: warning: cast discards qualifiers from pointer target type sdksyms.c:1679: warning: cast discards qualifiers from pointer target type sdksyms.c:1680: warning: cast discards qualifiers from pointer target type sdksyms.c:1681: warning: cast discards qualifiers from pointer target type CCLD Xorg /usr/local/lib/libfontenc.so: undefined reference to `gzgetc_' distcc[21895] ERROR: compile (null) on localhost failed gmake[4]: *** [Xorg] =D0=9E=D1=88=D0=B8=D0=B1=D0=BA=D0=B0 1 gmake[4]: =D0=92=D1=8B=D1=85=D0=BE=D0=B4 =D0=B8=D0=B7 =D0=BA=D0=B0=D1=82=D0= =B0=D0=BB=D0=BE=D0=B3=D0=B0 `/usr/ports_build/usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-se= rver/work/xorg-server-1.12.2/hw/xfree86' gmake[3]: *** [all-recursive] =D0=9E=D1=88=D0=B8=D0=B1=D0=BA=D0=B0 1 gmake[3]: =D0=92=D1=8B=D1=85=D0=BE=D0=B4 =D0=B8=D0=B7 =D0=BA=D0=B0=D1=82=D0= =B0=D0=BB=D0=BE=D0=B3=D0=B0 `/usr/ports_build/usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-se= rver/work/xorg-server-1.12.2/hw/xfree86' gmake[2]: *** [all] =D0=9E=D1=88=D0=B8=D0=B1=D0=BA=D0=B0 2 gmake[2]: =D0=92=D1=8B=D1=85=D0=BE=D0=B4 =D0=B8=D0=B7 =D0=BA=D0=B0=D1=82=D0= =B0=D0=BB=D0=BE=D0=B3=D0=B0 `/usr/ports_build/usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-se= rver/work/xorg-server-1.12.2/hw/xfree86' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] =D0=9E=D1=88=D0=B8=D0=B1=D0=BA=D0=B0 1 gmake[1]: =D0=92=D1=8B=D1=85=D0=BE=D0=B4 =D0=B8=D0=B7 =D0=BA=D0=B0=D1=82=D0= =B0=D0=BB=D0=BE=D0=B3=D0=B0 `/usr/ports_build/usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-se= rver/work/xorg-server-1.12.2/hw' gmake: *** [all-recursive] =D0=9E=D1=88=D0=B8=D0=B1=D0=BA=D0=B0 1 *** [do-build] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-server. *** [build] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-server. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 08:39:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C783106564A for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:39:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller23@insightbb.com) Received: from mail.insightbb.com (smtp.insight.synacor.com [208.47.185.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43668FC12 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:39:47 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=jTbSy0seeGr3lawcuNjWAzxTYqXkd3bnzsbKLWGZh24= c=1 sm=0 a=JD5Lldb2u-MA:10 a=jLN7EqiLvroA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=RNePMsTqcQRwRfu6o3gA:9 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=Q/oqmR4JO1zR3vNQamCQeQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.insight.synacor.com smtp.mail=mueller23@insightbb.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: smtp01.insight.synacor.com header.from=mueller23@insightbb.com; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (smtp01.insight.synacor.com: transitional domain insightbb.com does not designate 74.134.26.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.134.26.53] ([74.134.26.53:59018] helo=localhost) by mail.insightbb.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.40 r(29895/29896)) with ESMTP id 38/C9-31432-C4D54DF4; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 04:39:40 -0400 Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 04:39:40 -0400 Message-ID: <38.C9.31432.C4D54DF4@smtp01.insight.synacor.com> From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Bryan Drewery Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Please convert your ports to new options framework X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:39:48 -0000 from Doug Barton : There's a "What users need to know" section here: http://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/Options/OptionsNG Regards, Bryan Drewery That looks helpful, Thanks! There are also many other useful FreeBSD-pertinent guides on wiki.freebsd.org . Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 08:47:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 638AE1065677; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:47:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC83F8FC14; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [188.174.56.217] (helo=localhost.my.domain) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SddoI-0001aE-Mv; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:47:46 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5A8liDN003025; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:47:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id q5A8li0e003024; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:47:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:47:43 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Max Brazhnikov Message-ID: <20120610084743.GA2999@tinyCurrent> References: <20111118125403.GA1255@tiny> <201111221737.04353.makc@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <201111221737.04353.makc@freebsd.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT r214444 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 188.174.56.217 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/textproc/stardict3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:47:54 -0000 El día Tuesday, November 22, 2011 a las 05:37:03PM +0000, Max Brazhnikov escribió: > On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:54:04 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Hello, > > > > The port (ports tree from CVS) ports/textproc/stardict3 > > > > ports/textproc/stardict3 > > PORTVERSION= 3.0.3 > > MAINTAINER= makc@FreeBSD.org > > > > installs fine on 10-CURRENT, but the application just crahes or runs > > into a CPU loop; if it runs into CPU loop there is a core file of 'troff', > > i.e. it seems that it started for some man page reason the troff(1) and > > after this it loops; > Stardict has plugin for displaying man pages. > > > ... > > I could go back to 3.0.3 and provide more details of the crash, but I > > can't debug or solve this on my own. Or should I file a bug report? > > backtrace would be nice to have. Hi Max, I've installed another fresh 10-CURRENT (r235646, ports from CVS as of May 19) and luckily it crashes again reproduceable; a bt of gdb looks like this: $ gdb /usr/local/bin/stardict stardict.core ... #0 0x2966868b in thr_kill () from /lib/libc.so.7 [New Thread 29c07e00 (LWP 100375/stardict)] [New Thread 29c03300 (LWP 100369/stardict)] [New Thread 29c03080 (LWP 100203/stardict)] (gdb) bt #0 0x2966868b in thr_kill () from /lib/libc.so.7 #1 0x295ffed6 in pthread_sigmask () from /lib/libthr.so.3 #2 0x296005ab in raise () from /lib/libthr.so.3 #3 0x2971ddea in abort () from /lib/libc.so.7 #4 0x291bb6ec in g_assertion_message () from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #5 0x291bbd4d in g_assertion_message_expr () from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #6 0x08118a6b in HttpClient::on_connected () #7 0x0805a232 in ?? () #8 0x0805e63a in ?? () #9 0x080b8e69 in std::operator+, std::allocator > () #10 0x080b8eab in std::operator+, std::allocator > () #11 0x28965591 in gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__VOID () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #12 0x2911bea3 in g_closure_invoke () from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #13 0x29133992 in g_signal_handlers_block_matched () from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #14 0x291359f0 in g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #15 0x29135c70 in g_signal_emit_by_name () from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #16 0x289ce2f2 in gtk_target_list_unref () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #17 0x289ce6a5 in gtk_target_list_unref () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #18 0x289671c4 in gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__VOID () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #19 0x2911a767 in g_ptr_array_get_type () from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #20 0x2911bea3 in g_closure_invoke () from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #21 0x29133b58 in g_signal_handlers_block_matched () from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #22 0x29135706 in g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #23 0x29135d45 in g_signal_emit () from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #24 0x28a8dc66 in gtk_widget_style_attach () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #25 0x289611e5 in gtk_main_do_event () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #26 0x28c49f1a in gdk_add_client_message_filter () from /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 #27 0x291952d7 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #28 0x2919935e in g_main_context_prepare () from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #29 0x29199767 in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #30 0x289615c4 in gtk_main () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #31 0x0806482b in ?? () #32 0x08064db1 in ?? () #33 0x08058a46 in ?? () #34 0x00000001 in ?? () #35 0xbfbfe724 in ?? () #36 0xbfbfe72c in ?? () #37 0xbfbfe6d8 in ?? () #38 0x00000000 in ?? () #39 0x00000000 in ?? () #40 0x00000000 in ?? () #41 0xbfbfe710 in ?? () #42 0xbfbfe720 in ?? () #43 0x00000000 in ?? () #44 0xbfbfe71c in ?? () #45 0x080589c8 in ?? () Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) Does this help? Let me know if you need more info or want me test changes in the source. Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11 | UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2 | FreeBSD since 2.2.5 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 08:48:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E7C1065676; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:48:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yerenkow@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5352B8FC26; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:48:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so6362842obc.13 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 01:48:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=GtHWIgLmbEr20dwnA/gl7vH3nG1Ucdl17FHigQUPHl8=; b=p30asrYggocY4OHuXM3ptFYf1TanO+tZ6BmCbzqjtq7oGBz6lCIoUQJuWFfb6J87lD mknL3LVpeFc0t9GCJ5LWa5tQnzLSiq4CnAGt+JHothozM23Xwun2BU9v+lKvOT/WnPii Amhqzb0rLNXqNdcWzb9HvK4bpN4MDaelwc8a92rp6J/VqBuqf6tIxMoIvA7EtX+LK9Gz wdEVBZc/5JzxNY6FelysZVqI+jLVojuX/qrKjTMfUAtku5H1prUT7vsyNXAHlmJu1TcQ uxJNmq0q7N698OJTRvrP8L4Xwh3o/8YOLZ3VoRbIdRkD9g15XtPeEWGhDLU1sZkSrx9X +hjA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.111.39 with SMTP id if7mr5032979obb.55.1339318121996; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 01:48:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.125.100 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 01:48:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4fd44f39.06db440a.4ccb.ffffe4e1SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> References: <20120607203753.2466c63a.miwi@FreeBSD.org> <4fd44f39.06db440a.4ccb.ffffe4e1SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:48:41 +0300 Message-ID: From: Alexander Yerenkow To: Ivan Klymenko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, miwi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Xorg 7.7 ready for testing! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:48:43 -0000 Is this fresh installation or you were upgrading? I'm preparing now live image with new xorg, and don't saw such errors. But I had yesterday's src/ports tree. -- Regards, Alexander Yerenkow From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 08:55:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C819106566B; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:55:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from fsm2.ukr.net (fsm2.ukr.net [195.214.192.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D648FC12; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:55:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=fsm; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=3HlM9i9GZ/JOTCgxVauym0cHZ8kdeCYin7B07P8jKPE=; b=cpmcmnhw1nuu9a6GGpSTQateUq8xpW7F7O3dPZ2aGzbIWch7ZUh514FwonwDkGU6oPnX5+U2JXTplY7QiLIIgBilmceVL4+T87W+6glDhdsUJCMf+slD52FeazZYKeGgLqr/RlgRXFz/xgGV25/BTb1HJ6OqjGz70rR5g9/3NoM=; Received: from [178.137.138.140] (helo=nonamehost.) by fsm2.ukr.net with esmtpsa ID 1Sddvx-000656-Eh ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:55:41 +0300 Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:55:40 +0300 From: Ivan Klymenko To: Alexander Yerenkow Message-ID: <20120610115540.5536b3a7@nonamehost.> In-Reply-To: References: <20120607203753.2466c63a.miwi@FreeBSD.org> <4fd44f39.06db440a.4ccb.ffffe4e1SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ports@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, miwi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Xorg 7.7 ready for testing! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 08:55:44 -0000 =D0=92 Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:48:41 +0300 Alexander Yerenkow =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > Is this fresh installation or you were upgrading? of course updating > I'm preparing now live image with new xorg, and don't saw such errors. > But I had yesterday's src/ports tree. >=20 >=20 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 09:14:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F531065677; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:14:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from fsm2.ukr.net (fsm2.ukr.net [195.214.192.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DBD98FC20; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:14:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=fsm; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=IpKxpkoGArE9U+S8YTfjGAaVL8fo/r+B3HLIkSi89kI=; b=NwtFynNx0ejmZTefjDU5jp6fD7Y8597Cchh6bZRd0AC8XtSpuELJQk3uU6fO0mIxsOh1ul+ZqzGAPl+nfgeKSnPbu3Vx4rbyqXhcpdC7PT7vrgqlW5SmxmyLaxDDc59X/dUjHnu1AtLzH2KA9aU73dSLdj0wYWZLzRZiodKSfh0=; Received: from [178.137.138.140] (helo=nonamehost.) by fsm2.ukr.net with esmtpsa ID 1SdeDf-0008vz-SP ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:13:59 +0300 Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:13:58 +0300 From: Ivan Klymenko To: Alexander Yerenkow Message-ID: <20120610121358.46026b5d@nonamehost.> In-Reply-To: References: <20120607203753.2466c63a.miwi@FreeBSD.org> <4fd44f39.06db440a.4ccb.ffffe4e1SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ports@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, miwi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Xorg 7.7 ready for testing! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:14:02 -0000 =D0=92 Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:48:41 +0300 Alexander Yerenkow =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > Is this fresh installation or you were upgrading? > I'm preparing now live image with new xorg, and don't saw such errors. > But I had yesterday's src/ports tree. >=20 >=20 Forgot to add - to svn r501 everything is fine build and working... From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 09:16:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D50106564A for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:16:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cjr@cruwe.de) Received: from cruwe.de (cruwe.de [188.40.164.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA458FC0C for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cruwe.de (unknown [127.0.0.4]) by cruwe.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7B9D9A3 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:16:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by cruwe.de (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 2BAF1D9A2; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:16:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.cruwe.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from dijkstra.cruwe.de (p57BDF164.dip.t-dialin.net [87.189.241.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cruwe.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2241AD99F for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:16:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:15:46 +0200 From: "Christopher J. Ruwe" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120610111546.61d7f400@dijkstra.cruwe.de> In-Reply-To: <4FD3A0F4.50802@acsalaska.net> References: <20120608204143.5a1d780a@dijkstra.cruwe.de> <4FD268B5.4050103@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120609132520.42b0af28@dijkstra.cruwe.de> <4FD33B6A.7050206@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4FD3A0F4.50802@acsalaska.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/y0bHpFihGaVNc2zn18oP0xk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV on mail.cruwe.de using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: math/ess CONFLICTS with devel/noweb, help with CONFLICTS= needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:16:18 -0000 --Sig_/y0bHpFihGaVNc2zn18oP0xk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:16:04 +0200 Mel Flynn wrote: > On 9-6-2012 14:02, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 09/06/2012 12:25, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote: > >> Thanks for your quick answer. Incidentally, I am at this moment > >> also preparing a maintainer update for a new version of math/ess. > >> Should I perpare two PRs, one for the CONFLICTS and one for the > >> actual update or is it permissable to pack these two into one? > >=20 > > It is best to put all the changes you want to make into one PR. > > That will get it processed most efficiently. >=20 > And if there's a PR for the conflict problem, then mention in your > update PR that this update "closes PR xxxxxx". >=20 Thanks for reminding me, I would surely have forgotten. However, closing another PR does not apply, I was approached using private mail by a group apparently implementing something like a FreeBSD ports conflicts checker, who are systematically combing the ports tree for conflicts not yet known by the maintainers. Some maintainer update PRs already adress problems thus found.=20 Thanks, cheers,=20 --=20 Christopher J. Ruwe TZ: GMT + 1h --Sig_/y0bHpFihGaVNc2zn18oP0xk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJP1GXSAAoJEJTIKW/o3iwUlScQAIwwAvfjcdM91hZNovDKyU1+ 05auY/yq/stVBcJC/aGqpdvMXTlyhGHQcj8gOstIajScVkJq2GFu7rQcuQ22Lse/ YoK6SKtbu9wX0hpOjF3XzIj3UpUjfXlLUePW42ZZJ8FkXvNYEYibO92mqy10a1/u K5rGKA0g18MEtWs22PJzQFEAPDgTZTb+zm3sv0ERe3o9xcG5Yp5ipdYZiXL0k1BQ Kie3vhMlrUHKQO5VOGHzWj+IUxI/MY/IDXU7BUxCRwYC1cz+eDfB2pr9uO/HqPE2 0VvlFNsnzaXmNcsB+oX7uI0UzF6zxWkyK7I8QgqFPusztQv5Q+h/HvmxlOcdrq/Q 4rQE6XNgzOnvs8bEZ1kRfg4pC6zwsLIYcvur1pkjK6Lolg8rKp5H/zG+fSJqGMa/ FKEgOGB9+r6CI3ckSDiOEGwE/U2j99pntQcaiUPQ+O8NbRBaxWJU3xl2tM6R7doF WE7OlmoDE/On/wqYB8BC9BiKW3E+jmmXbIoQwA2a16K05R06hbyCZ5tlLpcoo2ui E8jiBf5I43RvP1TAy/LvjVpy4ZZUG/YW0vQAG4Lpyf9jTLEAK6ahyQ4/lw3dwIZg lkY7xk+3p1Y128XOM5S75Hn8j6M1lekgLubno8qld33oxH8FG3432IS2jMA2QTfc NwMlQ7JEC1C+DXQ5Fol4 =KN53 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/y0bHpFihGaVNc2zn18oP0xk-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 09:46:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC641065670; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:46:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yerenkow@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68DA78FC18; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:46:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so6425439obc.13 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:46:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=VVjPb/tc8O2n5dQvfxZKIk4SKQgejbNDYd8kTSScn6M=; b=Hv5PvVCM+zmYFGc27hySkf2Bwda0Nm1KMTzGZyAafbiGtJcNniItqqgjPzPK8fuq8Q LJ/3yb//onemNM5Pie2H+9fki06wkJGDK3H/ETH8BFkyWqY3MXTASLYc/Vw+1GRgnamM H37rksa2ZvOPmAamLfBkNLT01PIfS/2uKuwYZ31q24FvWwLxIFlOsAIcZ+PCCo4yyeWP iEmaMUnyDNf33LZ29gpsa/MzJjNvHE7kxUa8Aq2S+/EacrFLp/ZNLsJFQ0jLuf7WB+XH yPrpsxCl6Fk9PxdRf8uHdYr1gPrVG65PueLQll68KhsNisy3oJL2otsQqUw8XLeEVh0i 7gtw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.31.11 with SMTP id w11mr12869231obh.64.1339321597632; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:46:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.125.100 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:46:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4fd465de.c6e5440a.7956.fffff5baSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> References: <20120607203753.2466c63a.miwi@FreeBSD.org> <4fd44f39.06db440a.4ccb.ffffe4e1SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <4fd465de.c6e5440a.7956.fffff5baSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:46:37 +0300 Message-ID: From: Alexander Yerenkow To: Ivan Klymenko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, miwi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Xorg 7.7 ready for testing! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:46:38 -0000 Okay everyone interested - listen up :) http://gits.kiev.ua/FreeBSD/FreeBSD-10-i386-2012-06-08.img.xz Here is the image, which can be dd'ed to 4g+ flash drive. It should be bootable, and contains new xorg, and some soft from ports; - seamonkey (if you want go to internet) - stellarium (it's full of stars) - blender (but it depends on devel/icu which probably built with error, or by some other reason blender produces coredump) - xterm and openbox; How to use: boot, login as root; after passwordless login you can view simple x run script with: cat ./runx.sh or you just launch it ./runx.sh If you have non-intel card, you need edit xorg.conf, and runx.sh (remove load i915kms). Load process and X launching can be a while if you have not very fast flash. I'll continue improving of infrastructure for building such testing images, helps and advises appreciated. -- Regards, Alexander Yerenkow From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 10:00:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4BB1065670; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:00:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vmagerya@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C3C8FC08; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so2225568wgb.31 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 03:00:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=pcpaWphJACsRN2f/dnTqVlYCm8MAjYVdtnruUWNDbRY=; b=Au8nVrL4X/wzl1hWTBw6wNKFUejV6LdTyPCorkfWQi5BLFX1PbnUudovv695PB4jWn D1emWEqIHMJGg/u3dE7fe3NJ6BhT+W2RAgEEHRd9yIubCu4BqXPnnxpRqF2zGhQ3jK2j PI5KNAw2Lmk2vcpdLbSXOtkuxvaowKm+wBA8NIK2tjO5riCdvix3jefJ9t1MUfaPCfYE YXqKd5N3kqnrKiH4c+mLFY3AOiPqtSBWCz/DL7EPtj3pffZpQKZVQLPP+4u0fkxKgAq8 TtkHyTB/O5o8GpUIi3GXt09zQQA3o29oito95WpWBA05u2EvJEfqcPXKEExXGGHgCWbL pUVA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.198.164 with SMTP id v36mr4648364wen.199.1339322405737; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 03:00:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.1.208 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 03:00:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120609172649.GJ60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <201206040841.q548fVHa091169@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <201206041841.q54IfUow001060@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604191343.GF10783@isuckatdomains.isuckatdomains.net> <201206041932.q54JWONA001600@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FCDA15C.2000700@digsys.bg> <201206061859.q56IxvLx045828@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FCFC846.5050508@FreeBSD.org> <201206070527.q575R1sX052893@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FD37B40.2030500@FreeBSD.org> <20120609172649.GJ60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 13:00:05 +0300 Message-ID: From: Vitaly Magerya To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=001636eeec343bd44b04c21b4c9e Cc: Dave Hayes , Doug Barton , FreeBSD ports list Subject: Re: Documenting 'make config' options X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:00:08 -0000 --001636eeec343bd44b04c21b4c9e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > There was a PR[1] to use some dialog(1) feature to expose it to > the user, would be nice if that extended description could > implemented that way (using help button from dialog(1)) I do not > plan to work on this now if someone want to do it that will be > great > > 1: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/123185 I'm attaching a simple patch that allows you to hit F1 and view pkg-options-descr file in the options dialog ("pkg-" prefix should probably be removed, as that file has nothing to do with packages). --001636eeec343bd44b04c21b4c9e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="bsd.port.mk.diff.txt" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="bsd.port.mk.diff.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: file0 LS0tIGJzZC5wb3J0Lm1rLm9yaWcJMjAxMi0wNi0xMCAxMToxMTo0MC4wMDAwMDAwMDAgKzAzMDAK KysrIGJzZC5wb3J0Lm1rCTIwMTItMDYtMTAgMTI6MTU6NDQuMDAwMDAwMDAwICswMzAwCkBAIC0y Mzc0LDYgKzIzNzQsNyBAQAogLmVuZGlmCiAKIERFU0NSPz0JCQkke1BLR0RJUn0vcGtnLWRlc2Ny CitPUFRJT05TX0RFU0NSPz0JJHtQS0dESVJ9L3BrZy1vcHRpb25zLWRlc2NyCiBQTElTVD89CQkJ JHtQS0dESVJ9L3BrZy1wbGlzdAogUEtHSU5TVEFMTD89CSR7UEtHRElSfS9wa2ctaW5zdGFsbAog UEtHREVJTlNUQUxMPz0JJHtQS0dESVJ9L3BrZy1kZWluc3RhbGwKQEAgLTYwNjgsOCArNjA2OSwx NSBAQAogCSgke0VDSE9fTVNHfSAiPT09PiBDYW5ub3QgY3JlYXRlICQke29wdGlvbnNkaXJ9LCBj aGVjayBwZXJtaXNzaW9ucyI7IGV4aXQgMSkKIC5lbmRpZgogCUBUTVBPUFRJT05TRklMRT0kJCht a3RlbXAgLXQgcG9ydG9wdGlvbnMpOyBcCisJaWYgWyAtZSAiJHtPUFRJT05TX0RFU0NSfSIgXTsg dGhlbiBcCisJCWhlbHBvcHQ9Ii0taGZpbGUgJHtPUFRJT05TX0RFU0NSfSI7IFwKKwkJaGVscHRp dGxlPSIgKEYxIGZvciBkZXRhaWxzKSI7IFwKKwllbHNlIFwKKwkJaGVscG9wdD0iIjsgXAorCQlo ZWxwdGl0bGU9IiI7IFwKKwlmaTsgXAogCXRyYXAgIiR7Uk19IC1mICQke1RNUE9QVElPTlNGSUxF fTsgZXhpdCAxIiAxIDIgMyA1IDEwIDEzIDE1OyBcCi0JJHtESUFMT0d9IC0tY2hlY2tsaXN0ICJP cHRpb25zIGZvciAke1BLR05BTUU6Qy8tKFteLV0rKSQvIFwxL30iIDIxIDcwIDE1ICR7REVGT1BU SU9OU30gMj4gJCR7VE1QT1BUSU9OU0ZJTEV9IHx8IHsgXAorCSR7RElBTE9HfSAkJHtoZWxwb3B0 fSAtLWNoZWNrbGlzdCAiT3B0aW9ucyBmb3IgJHtQS0dOQU1FOkMvLShbXi1dKykkLyBcMS99JCR7 aGVscHRpdGxlfSIgMjEgNzAgMTUgJHtERUZPUFRJT05TfSAyPiAkJHtUTVBPUFRJT05TRklMRX0g fHwgeyBcCiAJCSR7Uk19IC1mICQke1RNUE9QVElPTlNGSUxFfTsgXAogCQkke0VDSE9fTVNHfSAi PT09PiBPcHRpb25zIHVuY2hhbmdlZCI7IFwKIAkJZXhpdCAwOyBcCg== --001636eeec343bd44b04c21b4c9e-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 10:04:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D54106566C; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F290F8FC08; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:04:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1Sdf0j-0005t2-He>; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:04:41 +0200 Received: from e178032032.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.32.32] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1Sdf0j-000628-Bx>; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:04:41 +0200 Message-ID: <4FD47138.6090000@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:04:40 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120601 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Yerenkow References: <20120607203753.2466c63a.miwi@FreeBSD.org> <4fd44f39.06db440a.4ccb.ffffe4e1SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <4fd465de.c6e5440a.7956.fffff5baSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig13B34A1CD9120C8E2AFDDB54" X-Originating-IP: 85.178.32.32 Cc: Ivan Klymenko , ports@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, miwi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Xorg 7.7 ready for testing! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:04:43 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig13B34A1CD9120C8E2AFDDB54 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06/10/12 11:46, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: > Okay everyone interested - listen up :) >=20 > http://gits.kiev.ua/FreeBSD/FreeBSD-10-i386-2012-06-08.img.xz >=20 > Here is the image, which can be dd'ed to 4g+ flash drive. > It should be bootable, and contains new xorg, and some soft from ports;= > - seamonkey (if you want go to internet) > - stellarium (it's full of stars) > - blender (but it depends on devel/icu which probably built with > error, or by some other reason blender produces coredump) > - xterm and openbox; >=20 > How to use: > boot, login as root; > after passwordless login you can view simple x run script with: > cat ./runx.sh >=20 > or you just launch it > ./runx.sh >=20 > If you have non-intel card, you need edit xorg.conf, and runx.sh > (remove load i915kms). > Load process and X launching can be a while if you have not very fast f= lash. >=20 > I'll continue improving of infrastructure for building such testing > images, helps and advises appreciated. >=20 This is very nice ;-) Thank you very much. oh --------------enig13B34A1CD9120C8E2AFDDB54 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP1HE4AAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8ZJ0H/0giqJ6pMkPtOm1XEdtq+sfl xqxClD7+04SutiUVsIeLdN8Q6l5WA4XSowqgCT0BShOTLftW6UFEMJ550rSaaf2I Pn2iicud35NOSs5Ca59CywwFVJbtJdvyo2nNvEWXzKt7rTmVU17D4eCu4dHj6yiL mRJrc+11jFuS2qs+P982MCRCyReiMJrvygDoEZxJWVty28FgoJFDcPgNkbQLG95J OUYftNiFqOkV7HMAGA619Rb8berQGWxBveJYAqB4TLaqLv4p5gD3xQpx9USpDVTZ gY7iINLXWBkdNDRvMGV1aFv4bixCmPZMZqWL6Cjdbm9QVdK5HeVEUiPOduLRkzQ= =dDOs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig13B34A1CD9120C8E2AFDDB54-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 11:17:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009D51065785; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:17:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrnils@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE6B8FC15; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:17:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so3519255bkv.13 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 04:17:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ZPPd3lw7XXJyjsCGv9NUWt2sGYpsQT9GIewF1qRLL5s=; b=Jq459m58TuVkc0gMb7A6boE/EYcVaVznkUf3l/dtGZCVWNa3viF4bfHu+z8KOboeEZ O+BzJp2M/IpIuZeenBlfPj7wbgIo4nR0KCcuAsVk7CrZSdAqpUaqp6wdtrwxwP4ZstjS B8ihdbkAQAvSUMJrMEmdjlTQkIORsEfhiSjZ25/RhmplUdesotuMJQtHQNUquAVvr6Yl zDJj71saRPrQRZiZ+qtsEMJqmo4pCWL9zLHAhIRlNtyHTwsf/YcxatzwDz2H86UVoooG UkiuJK8gllgChiCPDjUHdGD2jCGGTEpSfSp4SykEoZ0E6ySDSL/ZBkeXxA/GeHhHmwJz hTJA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.133.212 with SMTP id hz20mr8632727bkc.99.1339327039141; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 04:17:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.100.83 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 04:17:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4fd465a3.46e8440a.7470.0336SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> References: <20120607203753.2466c63a.miwi@FreeBSD.org> <4fd44f39.06db440a.4ccb.ffffe4e1SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <4fd465a3.46e8440a.7470.0336SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 13:17:18 +0200 Message-ID: From: Andreas Nilsson To: Ivan Klymenko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Alexander Yerenkow , x11@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Xorg 7.7 ready for testing! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:17:24 -0000 On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > =D0=92 Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:48:41 +0300 > Alexander Yerenkow =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > > > Is this fresh installation or you were upgrading? > > I'm preparing now live image with new xorg, and don't saw such errors. > > But I had yesterday's src/ports tree. > > > > > > Forgot to add - to svn r501 everything is fine build and working... I checked out the xorg repo yesterday and it built just fine ( on 9.0-RELEASE with drm-all.14.5-releng9.0.patch ). I actually did this in a clone of my root-dataset so I started with pkg_delete -a :) ) Just a thought: shouldn't the new intel driver be part of the OPTIONS of the new xorg-drivers? I'll write back with the results when I get back into the office. Regards From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 11:22:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9231065679 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:22:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from benlaurie@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770628FC17 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfy7 with SMTP id fy7so2040935vcb.13 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 04:22:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=zTHcz1ALAh3LCc8Nia9Qo+IzNlkP73RHQgUmiXRqlwU=; b=vpxpC4UGFcDADj5JRzQseT3M7AmZvMzBNozDc2MBZeLje8UtJCYQqM5JPOCMUBds9o RJA2x7RMClP8tU/CU1+bHErEVWO5Ojxd3u4cgoNBq7VDYcvhtjGyv9uyDbJi0W7Pst0b zIIEuMtEDjaUPz4tCtUCemItWAmR/2me9ThDtV6k2LhXvdxBJdpbBn7MQHVd2MB5+wb/ yaVezCs3GsJlCI/kmPHLBFiyFa88tVZmm+cNgY1fBgMo+qkxZKH8CIE5zq0X5Opa2B9o tc7T/Y+DNXc8UOL/d7N2idcpI+MSMjSLxCseToHgJsYUOQBjXx46gr0apNZzWmZ7SLyF WEoA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.23.144 with SMTP id m16mr8994593vdf.77.1339327372589; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 04:22:52 -0700 (PDT) Sender: benlaurie@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.36.226 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 04:22:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:22:52 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: NtMLGzQXHIKlzlSW8NPxWiyu5AA Message-ID: From: Ben Laurie To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: make {run,build}-depends-list vs. pkg_info -r? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:22:53 -0000 I am confused... In audio/squeezecenter, I get: # make {run,build}-depends-list /usr/ports/archivers/p5-Compress-Zlib /usr/ports/audio/faad /usr/ports/audio/flac /usr/ports/audio/mac /usr/ports/audio/sox /usr/ports/converters/p5-Encode-Detect /usr/ports/converters/p5-JSON-XS /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-server /usr/ports/databases/p5-DBD-mysql /usr/ports/devel/p5-Time-HiRes /usr/ports/graphics/p5-GD /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8 /usr/ports/net/mDNSResponder /usr/ports/security/p5-Digest-SHA1 /usr/ports/textproc/p5-XML-Parser /usr/ports/textproc/p5-YAML-Syck /usr/ports/www/p5-HTML-Parser /usr/ports/www/p5-Template-Toolkit /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8 /usr/ports/sysutils/p5-File-Which but: # pkg_info -r squeezecenter-7.3.3 Information for squeezecenter-7.3.3: Depends on: Dependency: expat-2.0.1_2 Dependency: openssl-1.0.1_2 Dependency: mDNSResponder-333.10 Dependency: mp4v2-1.9.1 Dependency: libvpx-1.0.0 Dependency: perl-5.8.9_7 Dependency: p5-YAML-Syck-1.19 Dependency: p5-XML-Parser-2.41 Dependency: p5-HTML-Tagset-3.20 Dependency: p5-HTML-Parser-3.69 Dependency: p5-Digest-SHA1-2.13 Dependency: png-1.5.10 Dependency: jpeg-8_3 Dependency: gpac-libgpac-0.4.5_6,1 Dependency: x264-0.123.2189_2 Dependency: pkg-config-0.25_1 Dependency: opencv-core-2.3.1_4 Dependency: freetype2-2.4.9_1 Dependency: gd-2.0.35_8,1 Dependency: p5-GD-2.46_1 Dependency: p5-common-sense-3.4 Dependency: p5-Time-HiRes-1.9725,1 Dependency: p5-AppConfig-1.66 Dependency: p5-Template-Toolkit-2.24 Dependency: orc-0.4.16 Dependency: schroedinger-1.0.11 Dependency: libltdl-2.4.2 Dependency: p5-DBI-1.621 Dependency: mysql-client-5.0.95 Dependency: p5-DBD-mysql-4.021 Dependency: mysql-server-5.0.95 Dependency: p5-JSON-XS-2.32 Dependency: p5-Encode-Detect-1.01 Dependency: libiconv-1.14 Dependency: mac-3.99.4.5_1 Dependency: libogg-1.2.2,4 Dependency: libvorbis-1.3.3,3 Dependency: libtheora-1.1.1_2 Dependency: libmad-0.15.1b_2 Dependency: libid3tag-0.15.1b Dependency: libao-1.1.0_1 Dependency: lame-3.99.5 Dependency: gsm-1.0.13 Dependency: flac-1.2.1_2 Dependency: libsndfile-1.0.25_1 Dependency: faad2-2.7_3,1 Dependency: faac-1.28_2 Dependency: ffmpeg-0.7.12_2,1 Dependency: sox-14.3.2_4 Dependency: p5-IO-Compress-Base-2.015 Dependency: p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.054 Dependency: p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.015_1 Dependency: p5-Compress-Zlib-2.015 Why are the dependencies so different? e.g. the p5*Compress* ones... What's going on? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 11:26:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24D1106564A for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:26:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlaffaye.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE768FC17 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:26:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eabm6 with SMTP id m6so50457eab.13 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 04:26:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8NwjulKQNqfTCXzs7M+FXs4RssgZQeAWfZdXzongC1A=; b=j4Wu6Adh2bi28eDaQe/cYhyQa707D36Uu6gqgHYUk4JoodlwEM5GifRU3TDGEHapvU q17i7RKHmYLxBH3N0486welwzOYR4PbyEBTZJbBtL752Hzy2rhh5JY3jx8rw6G73j5+N y+apshxkVrDmdLkFU/NLSB9jGVwYaCU813LBdUV2m3wF8KyDIFI5bpBIHKoJ39eurDYW zyKV5qaicCrKwDppP+SP7lS4rXAtsKZK4xm9DglU+cmBDhAjDiy6gpC5BuYmU+Bnckt9 0JrraZ2gIleZSJaQOXsoQeDukO/9Zvkje6OhTERCQK75EdbhnTcXWwcOg6Gkudf9szrT 0DRA== Received: by 10.14.98.136 with SMTP id v8mr5543319eef.145.1339327587537; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 04:26:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:41d0:fc00:100:6534:f67f:f4a6:d46c? ([2001:41d0:fc00:100:6534:f67f:f4a6:d46c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z5sm41086064eem.3.2012.06.10.04.26.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 10 Jun 2012 04:26:26 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Julien Laffaye Message-ID: <4FD48467.6070309@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 13:26:31 +0200 From: Julien Laffaye User-Agent: Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: make {run,build}-depends-list vs. pkg_info -r? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:26:29 -0000 On 6/10/2012 1:22 PM, Ben Laurie wrote: > I am confused... > > In audio/squeezecenter, I get: > > # make {run,build}-depends-list > /usr/ports/archivers/p5-Compress-Zlib > /usr/ports/audio/faad > /usr/ports/audio/flac > /usr/ports/audio/mac > /usr/ports/audio/sox > /usr/ports/converters/p5-Encode-Detect > /usr/ports/converters/p5-JSON-XS > /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client > /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-server > /usr/ports/databases/p5-DBD-mysql > /usr/ports/devel/p5-Time-HiRes > /usr/ports/graphics/p5-GD > /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8 > /usr/ports/net/mDNSResponder > /usr/ports/security/p5-Digest-SHA1 > /usr/ports/textproc/p5-XML-Parser > /usr/ports/textproc/p5-YAML-Syck > /usr/ports/www/p5-HTML-Parser > /usr/ports/www/p5-Template-Toolkit > /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client > /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8 > /usr/ports/sysutils/p5-File-Which > > but: > > # pkg_info -r squeezecenter-7.3.3 > Information for squeezecenter-7.3.3: > > Depends on: > Dependency: expat-2.0.1_2 > Dependency: openssl-1.0.1_2 > Dependency: mDNSResponder-333.10 > Dependency: mp4v2-1.9.1 > Dependency: libvpx-1.0.0 > Dependency: perl-5.8.9_7 > Dependency: p5-YAML-Syck-1.19 > Dependency: p5-XML-Parser-2.41 > Dependency: p5-HTML-Tagset-3.20 > Dependency: p5-HTML-Parser-3.69 > Dependency: p5-Digest-SHA1-2.13 > Dependency: png-1.5.10 > Dependency: jpeg-8_3 > Dependency: gpac-libgpac-0.4.5_6,1 > Dependency: x264-0.123.2189_2 > Dependency: pkg-config-0.25_1 > Dependency: opencv-core-2.3.1_4 > Dependency: freetype2-2.4.9_1 > Dependency: gd-2.0.35_8,1 > Dependency: p5-GD-2.46_1 > Dependency: p5-common-sense-3.4 > Dependency: p5-Time-HiRes-1.9725,1 > Dependency: p5-AppConfig-1.66 > Dependency: p5-Template-Toolkit-2.24 > Dependency: orc-0.4.16 > Dependency: schroedinger-1.0.11 > Dependency: libltdl-2.4.2 > Dependency: p5-DBI-1.621 > Dependency: mysql-client-5.0.95 > Dependency: p5-DBD-mysql-4.021 > Dependency: mysql-server-5.0.95 > Dependency: p5-JSON-XS-2.32 > Dependency: p5-Encode-Detect-1.01 > Dependency: libiconv-1.14 > Dependency: mac-3.99.4.5_1 > Dependency: libogg-1.2.2,4 > Dependency: libvorbis-1.3.3,3 > Dependency: libtheora-1.1.1_2 > Dependency: libmad-0.15.1b_2 > Dependency: libid3tag-0.15.1b > Dependency: libao-1.1.0_1 > Dependency: lame-3.99.5 > Dependency: gsm-1.0.13 > Dependency: flac-1.2.1_2 > Dependency: libsndfile-1.0.25_1 > Dependency: faad2-2.7_3,1 > Dependency: faac-1.28_2 > Dependency: ffmpeg-0.7.12_2,1 > Dependency: sox-14.3.2_4 > Dependency: p5-IO-Compress-Base-2.015 > Dependency: p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.054 > Dependency: p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.015_1 > Dependency: p5-Compress-Zlib-2.015 > > Why are the dependencies so different? e.g. the p5*Compress* ones... > > What's going on? > pkg_info shows the complete dependencies, and not only the direct dependencies. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 09:21:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986A61065672 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from denkpadje@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F7B8FC1A for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfy7 with SMTP id fy7so2020012vcb.13 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:20:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=sYzuiiVpszDNrptcAIwc21IApNskhxB1yyRwXmz2zeY=; b=Ekz5dyYGlpiiM9n/VOYRIoP1QpVh/bOaBDwJxseZF+gwYLCYC4ASsElI5HDKbiFRZZ +f1XtYlY6PI9vVBZLUqrD1iJwdi8sWY2Y2tVf82RMmfhM0sCysVq7SLpu+9yC2GMRPD8 EFQIdqLHCqldaV/T4qtJkZkHh7B7LxG3060goV38qJkghaXg5S3PSBPFNWNEcRRyv1zp SoP2Mw+tM7RW4Hvrvr3oqoPFIbb87d5uNNnN704v68jEDh3d5dsvLYLLjr1mt6R8wnXf nlEFcPYvfXY5GGYK0GiPk2N0OSw2wkKvpBflwhz+7xY9A4oDv2X/RE6Z/At3b7C7eBHo fO1g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.27.244 with SMTP id w20mr8770849vdg.67.1339320055815; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:20:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.148.195 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:20:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:20:55 +0200 Message-ID: From: Denk Padje To: ports@FreeBSD.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:27:40 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: gnash-0.8.9_4 compiler error X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:21:02 -0000 gnash-0.8.9_4 fails to compile on FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE Options: PLUGIN, GTK, AGG, FFMPEG Installed dependency: ffmpeg-devel-2012.04.25_2 Don't know if this is due to having installed ffmpeg-devel instead of old ffmpeg, but the package manager was fine with it. libtool: compile: c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../libbase -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -I/usr/local/include/libpng -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/include -DCURL_STATICLIB -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/speex -I/usr/local/include -I../libvaapi -DREGISTER_MEDIA_HANDLERS -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=pentium-m -W -Wall -Wcast-align -Wcast-qual -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wunused -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -MT libgnashmedia_la-MediaHandlerFfmpeg.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libgnashmedia_la-MediaHandlerFfmpeg.Tpo -c ffmpeg/MediaHandlerFfmpeg.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/libgnashmedia_la-MediaHandlerFfmpeg.o In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/type_traits/aligned_storage.hpp:11, from /usr/local/include/boost/type_traits.hpp:20, from ../libbase/GnashFactory.h:32, from ./MediaHandler.h:26, from ffmpeg/MediaHandlerFfmpeg.h:22, from ffmpeg/MediaHandlerFfmpeg.cpp:21: /usr/local/include/boost/aligned_storage.hpp:90: warning: enumeral and non-enumeral type in conditional expression In file included from ffmpeg/MediaHandlerFfmpeg.cpp:26: ffmpeg/MediaParserFfmpeg.h:152: error: 'ByteIOContext' does not name a type ffmpeg/MediaParserFfmpeg.h:170: error: 'SampleFormat' has not been declared gmake[2]: *** [libgnashmedia_la-MediaHandlerFfmpeg.lo] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/graphics/gnash/work/gnash-0.8.9/libmedia' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/graphics/gnash/work/gnash-0.8.9' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/gnash. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/gnash. ===>>> make failed for graphics/gnash ===>>> Aborting update Terminated From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 11:07:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59AFF1065670; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:07:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9293D8FC0A; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:07:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eabm6 with SMTP id m6so48128eab.13 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 04:07:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xxZDXVjyLK3M5cAsToAAVBup72YhzKbAZAgZR+1nK0E=; b=hM0/LT9YgPwNgMcL73CGUV8zX2vx9pjr4ZHSFVUoH3CzVPfOP09lSXZjpxOqJR09e0 nkyIBt+ZAuWoN9TZnr859JztJojTD3mqnQFS+Ukq8klU+fJup8/YSRBTol+kxOHoViym Ewy2S9T8fRfmk0cc/GFAfxvsqtdRAzQGiy8EKAO05qnoPHT3f37G7b81kOeVrEU/Adp8 7Ot0/pqQ9GqxV38ADUJ9UopRB2GSCzUU9onY2bDhsLWFH8AIHEepvWyoB8tz5qjo/luX HaSvkpX3fQJCPEXBduwaEbuZ6dqnUmjAmsZDwWLcPXS5cBSFLFa8YHRSV136ddvW+/ST kcXw== Received: by 10.14.127.72 with SMTP id c48mr5465898eei.81.1339326427146; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 04:07:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Melon.malikania.fr (197.21.102.84.rev.sfr.net. [84.102.21.197]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o16sm40881218eeb.13.2012.06.10.04.07.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 10 Jun 2012 04:07:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FD47FD4.90609@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 13:07:00 +0200 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120604 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: x11@freebsd.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, miwi@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:28:04 +0000 Cc: Subject: Removing hal dependency of x11-drivers/xf86-input-synaptics X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:07:14 -0000 Hi, After 4 or 5 emails sent to miwi@ I think Martin just ignore me. It's about a commit for removing a useless HAL dependency added a few weeks ago. In fact, x11-drivers/xf86-input-synaptics may install an old and useless HAL file (.fdi), I have no problem with that, but a RUN_DEPENDS variable has been added against HAL and we need to install HAL and about 30 pulled in depencies. Here's the PR to remove this HAL dependency: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/167533 Please commit it, Cheers. -- David Demelier From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 11:40:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B273E106566C for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:40:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FEA8FC16 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:40:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6BED23C04 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 07:40:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C41DD23C03 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 07:40:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FD48794.70609@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 07:40:04 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <4FD47FD4.90609@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4FD47FD4.90609@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Removing hal dependency of x11-drivers/xf86-input-synaptics X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:40:12 -0000 On 6/10/12 7:07 AM, David Demelier wrote: > Hi, > > In fact, x11-drivers/xf86-input-synaptics may install an old and > useless HAL file (.fdi), I have no problem with that, but a RUN_DEPENDS > variable has been added against HAL and we need to install HAL and > about 30 pulled in depencies. > > Here's the PR to remove this HAL dependency: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/167533 It may be that something that you don't use needs HAL. so wait? x11 (and the new 7.5.2) needs a good shakeout. Additionally, adding an options knob (especially one that changes the default packaging), is usually done if there is significant call for it. Adding an option knob makes a build, rebuild, or upgrade stop in one more place would require a real need. (yes, 30 dependencies would be one indicator), second indicator would be that (some) packages are broken without it. Also, changing the default will change the default package distributed by FreeBSD on clusters. either wait for miwi, and/or always when adding an option knob keep the default behavior. (ps, did you rebuild and test x11/gsynaptics without HAL ? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 12:00:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A22E610658AB; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:00:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gh0-f182.google.com (mail-gh0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1BC8FC08; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:00:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghbz22 with SMTP id z22so2257810ghb.13 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 05:00:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=nA58072OMbMX1ncyXxri6y8fO1ylbdqfpW8DSGs2ce0=; b=u5WtdqT0ZtJRVeGVsT0BEK9EIMOLcpSQjGQkepCxd2dANdEfqK9GwOyCIxBivm6pmY Vj6o34O17pfyAFU/2Ix7wNcMfOE2aJ1vGxBSu1f+WHRjfjmndaiPa7DQ9udCR/gmN1Xk Az54Gk3bjp6hfVUOfdzwjWZLk5kbkMHNrlIbwSfbaxAQ7+abDwUYkkF1fopOKEDmkqMc eIRvZLrIvQ7TX89Nr7hgIcSw34/0QzREo0vodeZwtzzcsDpcOaRxZyXnXTHtNCVU5Kn1 BS8wabRTeO5tPRxKRZBOd1ShJeSoitwutwKxXAHJOtTT3tIJNVlIFw0oWiZfmM+RmMIh iLHA== Received: by 10.236.79.6 with SMTP id h6mr16081775yhe.71.1339329650695; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 05:00:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from luna.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com. [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g4sm43816431yhf.12.2012.06.10.05.00.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 10 Jun 2012 05:00:50 -0700 (PDT) From: ajtiM To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 07:00:26 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-RELEASE; KDE/4.8.3; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201206100700.26815.lumiwa@gmail.com> Subject: opengtl 0.9.17 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:00:51 -0000 On my FreeBSD 9.0-Release building of openglt-0.9.17 doesn't work with gcc 4.6 and with clan 3.0: /usr/ports/graphics/opengtl/work/OpenGTL-0.9.17/OpenGTL/GTLCore/StdTypes.h:93:7: warning: no newline at end of file /usr/ports/graphics/opengtl/work/OpenGTL-0.9.17/OpenGTL/GTLCore/LLVMBackend/CodeGenerator_p.cpp: In static member function 'static llvm::Constant* LLVMBackend::CodeGenerator::stringToConstant(llvm::LLVMContext&, const GTLCore::String&)': /usr/ports/graphics/opengtl/work/OpenGTL-0.9.17/OpenGTL/GTLCore/LLVMBackend/CodeGenerator_p.cpp:1244: error: 'llvm::ConstantDataArray' has not been declared *** Error code 1 [ 42%] Building CXX object OpenGTL/GTLCore/CMakeFiles/GTLCore.dir/LLVMBackend/ExpressionResult_p.cpp.o 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/opengtl. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/opengtl. ===>>> make failed for graphics/opengtl ===>>> Aborting update Mitja -------- http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 13:46:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97FFD1065686 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 13:46:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from geo.liaskos@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f49.google.com (mail-qa0-f49.google.com [209.85.216.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F018FC0A for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 13:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qabj40 with SMTP id j40so1903005qab.15 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 06:46:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Xu77x2sWKB4qiL3JWM8V45KzDDeHN6Dt9eB4anUgISA=; b=grhC/F5httpSdcms3iKcbM1n9mgQhozwp7t1CAEK6EKosvlbXsltxgYpIGUrqcM17f s03tjnVJgS30SHAOWEenc9ZLh5a5dNYsIM8LeaPc31ua4SOPwm/DOK8ur+m1zyqxALXk p4fR/fFZzplTaJUkgXoYTnYEjo/59amaKeXRQvCAuaCP0Q5iVIYok44p1yrcHOFmqvLF vfsX/NJ65dZZyOJroI0oS9dW3opsehRvxzt1qsz/o270MWF1rh40Tcf03G4Een8t7AOM td5RzI/0YoH6NedxYDsD15vLBO0eoG0qN2XhfTO0LwmhTR3P9UFQHofqNPIb6iMELneU aOkw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.188.7 with SMTP id cy7mr8084184qab.34.1339336000872; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 06:46:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.155.2 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 06:46:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:46:40 +0300 Message-ID: From: George Liaskos To: FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: pkgng crashes in make install. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 13:46:42 -0000 Hello, Under 9.0-RELEASE i386 the latest pkg from ports almost always crashes on me when running make install in a port directory. #0 0x282d8ca7 in sbuf_cat () from /lib/libsbuf.so.6 #1 0x282d8d01 in sbuf_cpy () from /lib/libsbuf.so.6 #2 0x280b9269 in sbuf_set (buf=0x2880e104, str=0x3
) at utils.c:61 #3 0x280ca8d0 in pkg_vset (pkg=0x2880e100, ap=0xbfbfe100 "") at pkg.c:269 #4 0x280caa61 in pkg_set2 (pkg=0x2880e100) at pkg.c:312 #5 0x08052ca3 in exec_register (argc=7, argv=0xbfbfea5c) at register.c:122 #6 0x0804fc61 in main (argc=7, argv=0xbfbfea5c) at main.c:313 Regards, George From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 14:29:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A54106566B for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lkchen@k-state.edu) Received: from ksu-sfpop-proxy01.merit.edu (ksu-sfpop-proxy01.merit.edu [207.75.116.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74568FC12 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ksu-sfpop-proxy01.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4ECD1280F6 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:22:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ksu-sfpop-proxy01.merit.edu Received: from ksu-sfpop-proxy01.merit.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ksu-sfpop-proxy01.merit.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Msd5EPq7gKtj for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:22:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ksu-sfpop-mailstore02.merit.edu (ksu-sfpop-mailstore02.merit.edu [10.108.1.211]) by ksu-sfpop-proxy01.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55941280D3 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:22:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:22:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng." To: FreeBSD ports list Message-ID: <112816604.15266766.1339338142827.JavaMail.root@ksu-sfpop-mailstore02> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [68.102.27.50] X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.1.4_GA_2567 (ZimbraWebClient - GC19 (Linux)/7.1.4_GA_2555) Subject: Re: libreoffice, Makefile fix proposal... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:29:21 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- > 2012/6/7 Sergio de Almeida Lenzi : > > Well, now that libreoffice build is > > solved, than =C2=A0what about insert > > a line: > > CONFLICTS_BUILD=3D =C2=A0 =C2=A0boost* > > near line 63 of Makefile??? >=20 > libreoffice does not conflict with boost; > just Makefile has a problem. >=20 > Attached is the patch. This patch didn't work for me. So, I tried the: # portmaster -g boost-libs boost-jam # pkg_delete -f boost-libs-\* boost-jam-\* # postmaster libreoffice # portmaster -PP --local-packagedir=3D/usr/ports/packages boost-libs bo= ost-jam or use pkg_add portmaster libreoffice didn't work...it got stuck =3D=3D=3D>>> Waiting on fetch & checksum for editors/libreoffice <<<=3D=3D= =3D =3D=3D=3D>>> Waiting on fetch & checksum for editors/libreoffice <<<=3D=3D= =3D =3D=3D=3D>>> Waiting on fetch & checksum for editors/libreoffice <<<=3D=3D= =3D =3D=3D=3D>>> Waiting on fetch & checksum for editors/libreoffice <<<=3D=3D= =3D =3D=3D=3D>>> Waiting on fetch & checksum for editors/libreoffice <<<=3D=3D= =3D ended up doing "make deinstall reinstall clean" And, then couldn't use portmaster to get boost-libs boost-jam back....so us= ed pkg_add. However, that was on my home machine. I then tried to do the same on a sys= tem at work....and it complained that boost wasn't installed in the configu= re, hmmmm...oh nevermind. Somebody had set 'CONFIGURE_ARGS=3D"--with-syste= m-boost"' in make.conf. Guess I'l try my steps again.... --=20 Who: Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. - W0LKC - Senior Unix Systems Administrator For: Enterprise Server Technologies (EST) -- & SafeZone Ally Snail: Computing and Telecommunications Services (CTS) Kansas State University, 109 East Stadium, Manhattan, KS 66506-3102 Phone: (785) 532-4916 - Fax: (785) 532-3515 - Email: lkchen@ksu.edu Web: http://www-personal.ksu.edu/~lkchen - Where: 11 Hale Library From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 15:58:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A97106564A; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:58:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coder@tuxfamily.org) Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002998FC19; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:58:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (unknown [88.184.221.231]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FAE6A62B9; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:58:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FD4C427.6080401@tuxfamily.org> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:58:31 +0200 From: "coder.tuxfamily" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120610 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rainer Hurling References: <4FD04971.5050005@gwdg.de> <4FD0A0E2.40801@metrico.lu> <4FD0A453.1030703@gwdg.de> <4FD0B201.9020406@metrico.lu> <4FD2F20C.7000507@tuxfamily.org> In-Reply-To: <4FD2F20C.7000507@tuxfamily.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh , freebsd-ports Subject: Re: [CFT] gdal 1.9.1 update and other changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:58:41 -0000 Le 09.06.2012 08:49, coder.tuxfamily a écrit : > Le 07.06.2012 15:52, Frank Broniewski a écrit : >> Yes, that worked. >> >> I tested it with py-gdal. First I had some problems because there were >> some other programs depending gdal-grass (QGIS, Grass GIS) which linked >> to the older gdal libs, but after deleting gdal-grass, I could import >> the module into python and run successfully some tests against some >> scripts I had written. >> > > Thank you for the works. I will make tests today with all my > scritps/plugins. > > Just a few remarks for now : > > - graphics/gdal > Maybe add this options : > ARMADILLO "Faster TPS transform computation" > CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--with-armadillo=yes > > FREEXL "FreeXL support" > LIB_DEPENDS+= freexl:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/freexl > CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --with-freexl=${LOCALBASE} > > MDB "Include MDB driver (need Java) > CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--with-mdb --with-java= ; Maybe with java bindings ? > > For PDF (Poppler OR podofo) > POPPLER "Poppler support (for PDF)" > LIB_DEPENDS+= poppler:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/poppler > CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--with-poppler=${LOCALBASE} > > PODOFO "PoDoFo support (for PDF)" > LIB_DEPENDS+= podofo:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/podofo > CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--with-podofo=${LOCALBASE} > --with-podofo-lib=${LOCALBASE}/lib > > SPATIALITE "Spatialite support" > CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --with-spatialite=${LOCALBASE} > > > I'm working for the other options, but need add some ports (libgdata ; > ogdi ; ESRI GDB Api ; RASDAMAN) > > > Is it possible to add bindings options directly into graphics/gdal ? > > > For other bindings : > Maybe add java bindings (for MDB protocol, very useful) > > For QGIS port (and maybe other like Grass) > Will need adding py-gdal when python is checked (used by plugins > GdalTools ; fTools ; openlayers ; GoogleLayers ... and many others) > > > Your works is very helpful thank you ! > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" My scripts/softs works fine with the new version. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 16:19:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4956A106566B; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:19:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD0E8FC19; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:19:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so1727148wib.13 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:19:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LvR7AF2vizOEnBGepvDveNVXNmVvToaCpA4YSLiIBtE=; b=NZxoGEt9YYGT4IVNPyQGsip8RcUOvGzTIl7X74UJu3hutaz2pu3X+60LbKyJq/uWx/ r6wPisWdvRf1br2ctfdGppV7WlM5AGCt4XxmzVfgJ00SiybuYgQeVPeYbcoQ/L3BaoIR 36bfvM7JeOzJjB0thNFlOASj8kndeT1UWKSWjZvNAlfWYCvxONgC9tz32llWpkUSMa0u YpfwoZQCDlTWnvEzsJWkk3ehIV8pm3ahnFmPzBWv1VrHxXcO/qfzTCcJJh/fc7TIvbmu Uh08qvNPXaXFd5hZAknxI0o4G1ZHn9DN7w+rbKrTUER0RnCI62A1cQfirxzAm7nYYvMX oqMg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.109.197 with SMTP id hu5mr14470989wib.8.1339345166405; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:19:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.155.4 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:19:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FD40E60.50405@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FD40E60.50405@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 09:19:26 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: Doug Barton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Martin Matuska , FreeBSD ports list Subject: Re: Imagemagick: FAIL, now in Magick++/demo/analyze.sh X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:19:28 -0000 On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > The new version fails in a new location, even with the default options. > Was this an amd64 system? All of my i386 systems installed the new ImageMagick cleanly, but my only amd64 system hit this. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 16:33:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26E51065672; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:33:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from fmailer.gwdg.de (fmailer.gwdg.de [134.76.11.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB848FC1D; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:33:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from p5dc3ecea.dip.t-dialin.net ([93.195.236.234] helo=krabat.raven.hur) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sdl53-0004KV-J2; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:33:33 +0200 Message-ID: <4FD4CC5A.1050107@gwdg.de> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:33:30 +0200 From: Rainer Hurling User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120610 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Oberman References: <4FD40E60.50405@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated: Id:rhurlin X-Spam-Level: - X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by exiscan+sophie Cc: Doug Barton , Martin Matuska , FreeBSD ports list Subject: Re: Imagemagick: FAIL, now in Magick++/demo/analyze.sh X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:33:41 -0000 On 10.06.2012 18:19 (UTC+2), Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >> The new version fails in a new location, even with the default options. >> > > Was this an amd64 system? All of my i386 systems installed the new > ImageMagick cleanly, but my only amd64 system hit this. > Yes, for me too, it fails on CURRENT amd64 system. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 17:10:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33181065670; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:10:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849B88FC0C; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1Sdleg-0003D6-Ho>; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:10:22 +0200 Received: from e178032032.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.32.32] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1Sdleg-00017E-Al>; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:10:22 +0200 Message-ID: <4FD4D4F6.9090805@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:10:14 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120601 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ports FreeBSD References: <20120604110339.GA9426@equilibrium.bsdes.net> <4FD2D4CC.3080109@ateamsystems.com> <4FD3003C.4080109@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4FD352FF.9090101@ateamsystems.com> <4FD357F2.9090901@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4FD35905.9080500@ateamsystems.com> <20120610121210.3ce1bd9d@zelda.sugioarto.com> <20120610165455.1c59e8ae@zelda.sugioarto.com> <4FD4C0AC.4000802@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <4FD4C0AC.4000802@yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigCC49ECD2589BC8743D2423B4" X-Originating-IP: 85.178.32.32 Cc: Current FreeBSD , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: WAS: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? New: port annoyance LibreOffice X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:10:29 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigCC49ECD2589BC8743D2423B4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06/10/12 17:43, John Merryweather Cooper wrote: > On 06/10/12 09:54, Martin Sugioarto wrote: >> Am Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:37:09 +0100 >> schrieb Chris Rees: >> >>> Er... people always test their commits. Sometimes edge cases will >>> creep in, such as the libreoffice failure which was due to different >>> configurations, but to suggest that the commit wasn't tested is quite= >>> frankly insulting-- it built on a clean system perfectly well. >> Hi, >> >> I don't mean to insult anyone. As I have already told, I am really >> thankful that people invest their precious time into updating the port= s >> collection. >> >> Whatever "clean system" means. It is surely not the default case that >> someone has got a freshly installed set of ports. >> >> Among all the default problems with ports, libreoffice[1] adds to the >> group of annoyances[2] at the moment. I don't know when I have seen >> "portmaster -ad" run through successfully last time. I need more and >> more "-x" options to exclude ports which fail to build. >> >> [1] german/libreoffice and libreoffice fails all the time in >> (LOCALIZED_LANG is set to "de"): >> >> Module 'lingucomponent' delivered successfully. 12 files copied, 2 >> files unchanged >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------= - >> Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry ! >> For more help with debugging build errors, please see the section i= n: >> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development >> >> internal build errors: >> >> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while >> making >> /usr/workdir-ports/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core= -3.5.2.2/vcl/prj >> >> >> it seems that the error is inside 'vcl', please re-run build >> inside this module to isolate the error and/or test your fix: >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------= - >> >> >> Whatever this tries to tell me. I don't get it. This is a completely >> useless error message for me. Not even in german/libreoffice. i try to build the standard version and I receive the same error. I can fix this by doing what the buildsystem suggests, but then I have a stop in sfx2 and others and it ends up in some module called tail_XXXX, where the build never ends when performing the repair as suggested. I had once a box running all the night looping building in this folder. >> >> [2] The default annoyances are for example: >> >> - After updating perl, php or whatever, it makes sense to enforce >> updating the modules that belong to these ports. I've seen 100x the= >> same message that p5-XML-Parser does not work and know what it mean= s, >> but this should be resolved by the port system. I mean, when you >> update perl, the perl modules won't work anymore. This is totally >> clear and it makes sense to update them first before going on. I can confirm that. I fixed that for me by "portmaster p5-" in case p5-SAX-XXX failed. >> >> - When specifying WITHOUT_X11 the ports should respect this and not tr= y >> to pull in the X11 variants of ports. I regularly see some ports >> pulling ImageMagick instead of the already installed >> ImageMagick-nox11. I still do not fully understand what is going on= >> with WITHOUT_GNOME, but I'll try to figure it out later. But I am >> quite sure that some ports pull in unneeded Gnome dependencies. >> >> - Ports are being marked as interactive and stop the update process. T= he >> idea behind portmaster was (earlier) to avoid interactive building = of >> ports and ask all the needed questions, before the builds start. I >> mean, earlier, I could get out and enjoy some coffee outdoors, now = I >> have to sit at the keyboard. This is unacceptable! ;) "portmaster" does even more damage. Sometimed a port reels in some newly updates, a port gets deleted. if on of the to be updated prerquisits fail, the port in question isn't there anymore. "portmaster" fails quite often in "oberwriting" remnant files. If a port gets corrupted by accident, like graphics/netpbm, One need to delete all binaries manually from /usr/local/bin, otherwise the installation fails. Somehow I wish to have a "brute force" knob to overwrite everything in a brutal way. >> >> - It would be nice to have a mechanism that tells you that your perl, >> mysql or whatever is not the default version anymore and you should= >> consider updating to the default (and recommended) port. >> >> >> Martin >=20 > From /etc/defaults/periodic.conf: >=20 > # 400.status-pkg > weekly_status_pkg_enable=3D"YES" # Find out-of-date pkgs= > pkg_version=3Dpkg_version # Use this program > pkg_version_index=3D/usr/ports/INDEX-9 # Use this index file >=20 > There's an override script in ports-mgmt/portupgrade that uses it's > database, also. >=20 --------------enigCC49ECD2589BC8743D2423B4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP1NT9AAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8wPgIAN490p9vbsOW6VeCymRZJ7HZ S56xKvXT6b3Fpc62968OdF2Z9Aybsb3vgdKJq2xKRwkkTavlb/sRD+azPrR5udbU Y+zrFDdPeNAL+MBQR4KZY7ply4gfNKr5fs6Z/QQLm8iIdVqqNXW1rEjMSIJCvN+L aVFLQc6PH+ikhco6c+PX1zvqV2mRDnDw8Mde6QJH7YLZagzdhIx5noCdLbQ3eFar 1no9MxJ08kB6az6dllbpJZF6eLpXGF1eR2nEXmCWixmCifGEn98qSB8GMPZ6zoW4 YYBx2VPUvrJsINkfOHN3/Fx2peqGcMyspHOMqeKat36a8vySQe21fYiUnw9c+o4= =5O0E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigCC49ECD2589BC8743D2423B4-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 17:20:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E928106566B; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:20:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F9E8FC1E; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:20:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so3670786bkv.13 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:20:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CWKp+/IMMY7GdfzqEE6IbgsblAgQDomGW2rElGu+RTQ=; b=Wjvag34+nlQ7oRPnHYrTUXRknk9xp1Uj+pN9eVNRXJKAr7LQbnL09kMrgsLnjBC2LA PdXK7a2JGbtAORLxvwTt++V9MZKCrtqNGvCX0FhjPIuVLGIXr1BMzLedUlMTBrF/nWXu 7I4tNIeoGZ3ownkXoZir8umIoGQ+LNrfxnDkVGeq0Xz7+dUzdDzN0xIsEGnwwtugVsSI LMkHk10sw2Zh6Z3biQxQfOxLD7ARNUUkT5zatBW2tXrlvDMG5hTmGPQgxVRgifrr1cs3 6PLPlIi303iPsZCgl4OF8cYVuNhP0T3yDh4AQRAYKUzLyndPHxPBpJSLlU4afdm7i0c8 3hUw== Received: by 10.204.154.214 with SMTP id p22mr8877374bkw.115.1339348851854; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:20:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.171.138 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:20:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FD4D4F6.9090805@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <20120604110339.GA9426@equilibrium.bsdes.net> <4FD2D4CC.3080109@ateamsystems.com> <4FD3003C.4080109@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4FD352FF.9090101@ateamsystems.com> <4FD357F2.9090901@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4FD35905.9080500@ateamsystems.com> <20120610121210.3ce1bd9d@zelda.sugioarto.com> <20120610165455.1c59e8ae@zelda.sugioarto.com> <4FD4C0AC.4000802@yahoo.com> <4FD4D4F6.9090805@zedat.fu-berlin.de> From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:20:21 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0-bF1tgGB35-dG1TY4rvshiiM-4 Message-ID: To: "O. Hartmann" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Current FreeBSD , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ports FreeBSD Subject: Re: WAS: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? New: port annoyance LibreOffice X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:20:54 -0000 On 10 June 2012 18:10, O. Hartmann wrote: > On 06/10/12 17:43, John Merryweather Cooper wrote: >> On 06/10/12 09:54, Martin Sugioarto wrote: >>> Am Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:37:09 +0100 >>> schrieb Chris Rees: >>> >>>> Er... people always test their commits. =A0Sometimes edge cases will >>>> creep in, such as the libreoffice failure which was due to different >>>> configurations, but to suggest that the commit wasn't tested is quite >>>> frankly insulting-- it built on a clean system perfectly well. >>> Hi, >>> >>> I don't mean to insult anyone. As I have already told, I am really >>> thankful that people invest their precious time into updating the ports >>> collection. >>> >>> Whatever "clean system" means. It is surely not the default case that >>> someone has got a freshly installed set of ports. >>> >>> Among all the default problems with ports, libreoffice[1] adds to the >>> group of annoyances[2] at the moment. I don't know when I have seen >>> "portmaster -ad" run through successfully last time. I need more and >>> more "-x" options to exclude ports which fail to build. >>> >>> [1] german/libreoffice and libreoffice fails all the time in >>> (LOCALIZED_LANG is set to "de"): >>> >>> Module 'lingucomponent' delivered successfully. 12 files copied, 2 >>> files unchanged >>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry = ! >>> =A0 =A0For more help with debugging build errors, please see the sectio= n in: >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Developme= nt >>> >>> =A0 =A0internal build errors: >>> >>> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while >>> making >>> /usr/workdir-ports/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-= 3.5.2.2/vcl/prj >>> >>> >>> =A0 it seems that the error is inside 'vcl', please re-run build >>> =A0 inside this module to isolate the error and/or test your fix: >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> Whatever this tries to tell me. I don't get it. This is a completely >>> useless error message for me. > > Not even in german/libreoffice. i try to build the standard version and > I receive the same error. > > I can fix this by doing what the buildsystem suggests, but then I have a > stop in sfx2 and others and it ends up in some module called tail_XXXX, > where the build never ends when performing the repair as suggested. I > had once a box running all the night looping building in this folder. > >>> >>> [2] The default annoyances are for example: >>> >>> - After updating perl, php or whatever, it makes sense to enforce >>> =A0 =A0updating the modules that belong to these ports. I've seen 100x = the >>> =A0 =A0same message that p5-XML-Parser does not work and know what it m= eans, >>> =A0 =A0but this should be resolved by the port system. I mean, when you >>> =A0 =A0update perl, the perl modules won't work anymore. This is totall= y >>> =A0 =A0clear and it makes sense to update them first before going on. > > I can confirm that. I fixed that for me by "portmaster p5-" in case > p5-SAX-XXX failed. There's an UPDATING message written for that very purpose. >>> >>> - When specifying WITHOUT_X11 the ports should respect this and not try >>> =A0 =A0to pull in the X11 variants of ports. I regularly see some ports >>> =A0 =A0pulling ImageMagick instead of the already installed >>> =A0 =A0ImageMagick-nox11. I still do not fully understand what is going= on >>> =A0 =A0with WITHOUT_GNOME, but I'll try to figure it out later. But I a= m >>> =A0 =A0quite sure that some ports pull in unneeded Gnome dependencies. >>> >>> - Ports are being marked as interactive and stop the update process. Th= e >>> =A0 =A0idea behind portmaster was (earlier) to avoid interactive buildi= ng of >>> =A0 =A0ports and ask all the needed questions, before the builds start.= I >>> =A0 =A0mean, earlier, I could get out and enjoy some coffee outdoors, n= ow I >>> =A0 =A0have to sit at the keyboard. This is unacceptable! ;) > > "portmaster" does even more damage. Sometimed a port reels in some newly > updates, a port gets deleted. if on of the to be updated prerquisits > fail, the port in question isn't there anymore. > > "portmaster" fails quite often in "oberwriting" remnant files. If a port > gets corrupted by accident, like graphics/netpbm, One need to delete all > binaries manually from /usr/local/bin, otherwise the installation fails. > > Somehow I wish to have a "brute force" knob to overwrite everything in a > brutal way. FORCE_PKG_REGISTER. >>> >>> - It would be nice to have a mechanism that tells you that your perl, >>> =A0 =A0mysql or whatever is not the default version anymore and you sho= uld >>> =A0 =A0consider updating to the default (and recommended) port. >>> >>> >>> Martin >> >> From /etc/defaults/periodic.conf: >> >> # 400.status-pkg >> weekly_status_pkg_enable=3D"YES" =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0# Find o= ut-of-date pkgs >> pkg_version=3Dpkg_version =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 # Use this program >> pkg_version_index=3D/usr/ports/INDEX-9 =A0 =A0 =A0# Use this index file >> >> There's an override script in ports-mgmt/portupgrade that uses it's >> database, also. >> > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 17:36:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A9B106567B; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:36:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9F48FC22; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:36:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1Sdm3z-0005WY-DA>; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:36:31 +0200 Received: from e178032032.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.32.32] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1Sdm3z-0002M8-6I>; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:36:31 +0200 Message-ID: <4FD4DB19.5090005@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:36:25 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120601 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <20120604110339.GA9426@equilibrium.bsdes.net> <4FD2D4CC.3080109@ateamsystems.com> <4FD3003C.4080109@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4FD352FF.9090101@ateamsystems.com> <4FD357F2.9090901@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4FD35905.9080500@ateamsystems.com> <20120610121210.3ce1bd9d@zelda.sugioarto.com> <20120610165455.1c59e8ae@zelda.sugioarto.com> <4FD4C0AC.4000802@yahoo.com> <4FD4D4F6.9090805@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA551136DDEEFDD43037E3AA0" X-Originating-IP: 85.178.32.32 Cc: Current FreeBSD , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ports FreeBSD Subject: Re: WAS: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? New: port annoyance LibreOffice X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:36:32 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA551136DDEEFDD43037E3AA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06/10/12 19:20, Chris Rees wrote: > On 10 June 2012 18:10, O. Hartmann wrote:= >> On 06/10/12 17:43, John Merryweather Cooper wrote: >>> On 06/10/12 09:54, Martin Sugioarto wrote: >>>> Am Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:37:09 +0100 >>>> schrieb Chris Rees: >>>> >>>>> Er... people always test their commits. Sometimes edge cases will >>>>> creep in, such as the libreoffice failure which was due to differen= t >>>>> configurations, but to suggest that the commit wasn't tested is qui= te >>>>> frankly insulting-- it built on a clean system perfectly well. >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I don't mean to insult anyone. As I have already told, I am really >>>> thankful that people invest their precious time into updating the po= rts >>>> collection. >>>> >>>> Whatever "clean system" means. It is surely not the default case tha= t >>>> someone has got a freshly installed set of ports. >>>> >>>> Among all the default problems with ports, libreoffice[1] adds to th= e >>>> group of annoyances[2] at the moment. I don't know when I have seen >>>> "portmaster -ad" run through successfully last time. I need more and= >>>> more "-x" options to exclude ports which fail to build. >>>> >>>> [1] german/libreoffice and libreoffice fails all the time in >>>> (LOCALIZED_LANG is set to "de"): >>>> >>>> Module 'lingucomponent' delivered successfully. 12 files copied, 2 >>>> files unchanged >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------= --- >>>> Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry ! >>>> For more help with debugging build errors, please see the section= in: >>>> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development >>>> >>>> internal build errors: >>>> >>>> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while >>>> making >>>> /usr/workdir-ports/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-co= re-3.5.2.2/vcl/prj >>>> >>>> >>>> it seems that the error is inside 'vcl', please re-run build >>>> inside this module to isolate the error and/or test your fix: >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------= --- >>>> >>>> >>>> Whatever this tries to tell me. I don't get it. This is a completely= >>>> useless error message for me. >> >> Not even in german/libreoffice. i try to build the standard version an= d >> I receive the same error. >> >> I can fix this by doing what the buildsystem suggests, but then I have= a >> stop in sfx2 and others and it ends up in some module called tail_XXXX= , >> where the build never ends when performing the repair as suggested. I >> had once a box running all the night looping building in this folder. >> >>>> >>>> [2] The default annoyances are for example: >>>> >>>> - After updating perl, php or whatever, it makes sense to enforce >>>> updating the modules that belong to these ports. I've seen 100x t= he >>>> same message that p5-XML-Parser does not work and know what it me= ans, >>>> but this should be resolved by the port system. I mean, when you >>>> update perl, the perl modules won't work anymore. This is totally= >>>> clear and it makes sense to update them first before going on. >> >> I can confirm that. I fixed that for me by "portmaster p5-" in case >> p5-SAX-XXX failed. >=20 > There's an UPDATING message written for that very purpose. And even WITH this message written in /usr/ports/UPDATING and follwoing those instrauctions, I have had the very same problem as for years now with this port. The problem is, if you'd like to do an "automated" or "unattended" update of the ports, you stumble very quickly in such a kind of show stopper. If you do not update on a regular basis, those "problems" develop in very serious problems. By the way, the reason why I update also the ports on a regular basis IS because of 100% sure problems if I wait for weeks or months. >=20 >>>> >>>> - When specifying WITHOUT_X11 the ports should respect this and not = try >>>> to pull in the X11 variants of ports. I regularly see some ports >>>> pulling ImageMagick instead of the already installed >>>> ImageMagick-nox11. I still do not fully understand what is going = on >>>> with WITHOUT_GNOME, but I'll try to figure it out later. But I am= >>>> quite sure that some ports pull in unneeded Gnome dependencies. >>>> >>>> - Ports are being marked as interactive and stop the update process.= The >>>> idea behind portmaster was (earlier) to avoid interactive buildin= g of >>>> ports and ask all the needed questions, before the builds start. = I >>>> mean, earlier, I could get out and enjoy some coffee outdoors, no= w I >>>> have to sit at the keyboard. This is unacceptable! ;) >> >> "portmaster" does even more damage. Sometimed a port reels in some new= ly >> updates, a port gets deleted. if on of the to be updated prerquisits >> fail, the port in question isn't there anymore. >> >> "portmaster" fails quite often in "oberwriting" remnant files. If a po= rt >> gets corrupted by accident, like graphics/netpbm, One need to delete a= ll >> binaries manually from /usr/local/bin, otherwise the installation fail= s. >> >> Somehow I wish to have a "brute force" knob to overwrite everything in= a >> brutal way. >=20 > FORCE_PKG_REGISTER. Enabled by default in /etc/make.conf in my configuration. And the problem still persists ... --------------enigA551136DDEEFDD43037E3AA0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP1NseAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8M4UH/Ar63OEF7tum7LaTVxU8HsLO 0TTem5Bz+Gw6bLwn2Gfcj5J2rRt+t6Ivfstd7NCweG6onFpoaHtd8QWA/oRcNO7V WEwmJnFN9gVSsVjDpwSh84NzWv2MCRP6rvQMMp7K8ZPUhhFSfJW7bcU/QCUn1WtJ 4/bURmMX0t3ih8ri3YPVpQFbuNjSD0q0fjciAtvYNEwpgupyI8E4OSLutZmAfPNz rYK8BuWQ38l0mfGutqHrx9CDh2pbWo+VToLwsxCTVpUgcn+sYRC4zfyd2UQ7TeRv YzED9aGDphBAmprq7NDrk4tSgk8IXaxOreun6raBrfWS6d60sL82KDOAsMDFNDA= =NJ/B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA551136DDEEFDD43037E3AA0-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 17:52:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E941065670 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:52:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ahicks@p-o.co.uk) Received: from mail.p-o.co.uk (ligeti.p-o.co.uk [80.254.233.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040CE8FC08 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alanhicks.plus.com ([80.229.143.200] helo=schnittke.p-o.co.uk) by p-o.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1SdmH5-000NKV-5o; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:50:06 +0100 Message-ID: <4FD4DE45.80108@p-o.co.uk> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:49:57 +0100 From: Alan Hicks Organization: Persistent Objects Ltd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rotkap@gmx.de References: <4FD05DD0.6050401@cyberleo.net> <20120608092750.5b5cecb7@arsenic.lan> <4FD20839.9020708@p-o.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4FD20839.9020708@p-o.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Cc: Heino Tiedemann , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: firefox 13.0,1 needs lang/gcc46 -- to RUN?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:52:45 -0000 On 08/06/2012 15:12, Alan Hicks wrote: > On 08/06/2012 11:09, Heino Tiedemann wrote: >> Maciej Suszko wrote: >> >>> Heino Tiedemann wrote: >>>> >>>> What ist the meaning of >>>> >>>> ,---- >>>> | Use GCC 4.6 to fix build on newer FreeBSD versions >>>> `---- >>>> >>>> >>>> What meians "newer FreeBSD versions" here? >>>> http://www.freshports.org/www/firefox/ >>>> >>>> >>>> And what means >>>> >>>> ,---- >>>> | Don't depend on GCC 4.6 if clang is used >>>> `---- >>>> >>>> >>>> How an I use clang? >>>> http://www.freshports.org/www/firefox/ >>> >>> >>> I just simply built www/firefox with those flags to make: >>> CC=clang CXX=clang++ CPP=clang-cpp >>> >>> If you use portupgrade, this should work: >>> portupgrade -m 'CC=clang CXX=clang++ CPP=clang-cpp' firefox\* >> >> does not work :( >> >> clang++ -o nsUTF8UtilsSSE2.o -c -fvisibility=hidden >> -DMOZ_GLUE_IN_PROGRAM -DMOZILLA_INTERNlude >> -I../../../dist/include/nsprpub -I/usr/local/include >> -I/usr/local/include/nspr -I/usr -I/usr/local/include -fno-rtti >> -Qunused-arguments -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Woverloaded-virtid-offsetof >> -Wno-variadic-macros -Werror=return-type -Wno-unknown-warning-option >> -Wno-retur-std=gnu++0x -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -pipe >> -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -fno-omit-frame-/../../mozilla-config.h >> /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/xpcom/string/src/nsUTF8 >> In file included from >> /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/xpcom/string/src/nsUTF8UtilsSSE2.cpp:3: >> >> In file included from /usr/include/clang/3.0/emmintrin.h:31: >> In file included from /usr/include/clang/3.0/xmmintrin.h:31: >> /usr/include/clang/3.0/mmintrin.h:28:2: error: #error "MMX instruction >> set not enabled" >> #error "MMX instruction set not enabled" >> ^ >> In file included from >> /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/xpcom/string/src/nsUTF8UtilsSSE2.cpp:3: >> >> In file included from /usr/include/clang/3.0/emmintrin.h:31: >> /usr/include/clang/3.0/xmmintrin.h:417:19: error: unknown type name >> '__m64' >> static __inline__ __m64 __attribute__((__always_inline__, __nodebug__)) >> ^ >> /usr/include/clang/3.0/xmmintrin.h:417:25: error: expected unqualified-id >> static __inline__ __m64 __attribute__((__always_inline__, __nodebug__)) >> ^ >> In file included from >> /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/xpcom/string/src/nsUTF8UtilsSSE2.cpp:3: >> >> /usr/include/clang/3.0/emmintrin.h:42:19: error: unknown type name >> '__m128d' >> static __inline__ __m128d __attribute__((__always_inline__, __nodebug__)) >> ^ >> /usr/include/clang/3.0/emmintrin.h:42:27: error: expected unqualified-id >> static __inline__ __m128d __attribute__((__always_inline__, __nodebug__)) >> ^ >> In file included from >> /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/xpcom/string/src/nsUTF8UtilsSSE2.cpp:4: >> >> ../../../dist/include/nsUTF8Utils.h:90:10: error: use of undeclared >> identifier 'UTF8traits' >> if ( UTF8traits::isASCII(c) ) >> ^ >> ../../../dist/include/nsUTF8Utils.h:146:10: error: use of undeclared >> identifier 'UTF8traits' >> if ( UTF8traits::is2byte(c) ) >> ^ >> ../../../dist/include/nsUTF8Utils.h:152:15: error: use of undeclared >> identifier 'UTF8traits' >> else if ( UTF8traits::is3byte(c) ) >> ^ >> ../../../dist/include/nsUTF8Utils.h:158:15: error: use of undeclared >> identifier 'UTF8traits' >> else if ( UTF8traits::is4byte(c) ) >> ^ >> ../../../dist/include/nsUTF8Utils.h:164:15: error: use of undeclared >> identifier 'UTF8traits' >> else if ( UTF8traits::is5byte(c) ) >> ^ >> ../../../dist/include/nsUTF8Utils.h:170:15: error: use of undeclared >> identifier 'UTF8traits' >> else if ( UTF8traits::is6byte(c) ) >> ^ >> ../../../dist/include/nsUTF8Utils.h:186:10: error: use of undeclared >> identifier 'UTF8traits' >> if ( UTF8traits::isInSeq(c) ) >> ^ >> ../../../dist/include/nsUTF8Utils.h:393:18: error: use of undeclared >> identifier 'UTF8traits' >> if ( UTF8traits::isASCII(*p) ) >> ^ >> ../../../dist/include/nsUTF8Utils.h:395:23: error: use of undeclared >> identifier 'UTF8traits' >> else if ( UTF8traits::is2byte(*p) ) >> ^ >> ../../../dist/include/nsUTF8Utils.h:397:23: error: use of undeclared >> identifier 'UTF8traits' >> else if ( UTF8traits::is3byte(*p) ) >> ^ >> ../../../dist/include/nsUTF8Utils.h:399:23: error: use of undeclared >> identifier 'UTF8traits' >> else if ( UTF8traits::is4byte(*p) ) { >> ^ >> ../../../dist/include/nsUTF8Utils.h:442:23: error: use of undeclared >> identifier 'UTF8traits' >> else if ( UTF8traits::is5byte(*p) ) >> ^ >> ../../../dist/include/nsUTF8Utils.h:444:23: error: use of undeclared >> identifier 'UTF8traits' >> else if ( UTF8traits::is6byte(*p) ) >> ^ >> ../../../dist/include/nsUTF8Utils.h:686:24: error: no member named >> 'supports_sse2' in namespace 'mozilla' >> if (mozilla::supports_sse2()) >> ~~~~~~~~~^ >> fatal error: too many errors emitted, stopping now [-ferror-limit=] >> 20 errors generated. >> gmake[5]: *** [nsUTF8UtilsSSE2.o] Error 1 >> gmake[5]: Leaving directory >> `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/xpcom/string/src' >> gmake[4]: *** [libs] Error 2 >> gmake[4]: Leaving directory >> `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/xpcom/string' >> gmake[3]: *** [libs] Error 2 >> gmake[3]: Leaving directory >> `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/xpcom' >> gmake[2]: *** [libs_tier_platform] Error 2 >> gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release' >> gmake[1]: *** [tier_platform] Error 2 >> gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release' >> gmake: *** [default] Error 2 >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. >> > This may be related to clang treating mmx and sse separately, in some of > the Makefiles such as at xpcom/string/src/Makefile.in there are > CXXFLAGS+=-msse2 assignments without mmx which appears to be the issue, > after adding CFLAGS+= -mmmx to the port Makefile firefox appears to be > building ok, it'll be some hours om my ancient machine before it > finishes and I'm able to test. > > Hope this is of some help, > Alan I'm pleased to confirm that adding -mmmx works, after an hour or so firefox 13 is stable and I am happy, thunderbird also builds and is stable. For completeness, the cpu features from dmesg shows: CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2392.09-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf29 Family = f Model = 2 Stepping = 9 Features=0xbfebfbff Alan From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 17:59:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4768910657A8; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:59:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 299F78FC15; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:59:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5AHx2cN095412; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:59:02 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5AHx16l095411; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:59:01 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:58:59 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20120610175859.GN60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <4FD4140F.4010209@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kUBUi7JBpjcBtem/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FD4140F.4010209@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Heino Tiedemann , gerald@FreeBSD.org, rotkap@gmx.de, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: firefox 13.0,1 needs lang/gcc46 -- to RUN?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:59:02 -0000 --kUBUi7JBpjcBtem/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 08:27:11PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 06/06/2012 12:18, Heino Tiedemann wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > > Why this ports needs his compiler to RUN?! > >=20 > >=20 > > firefox 13.0,1 >=20 > It's very common for binaries built with gcc to link to libgcc, and/or > libstdc++: >=20 > ldd firefox-bin | grep gcc > libstdc++.so.6 =3D> /usr/local/lib/gcc46/libstdc++.so.6 (0x802b19000) > libgcc_s.so.1 =3D> /usr/local/lib/gcc46/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x8033a5000) >=20 > In an ideal world, we would have separate packages for the runtime libs > and the build tools so that packages could be more portable, but I would > imagine that would be a lot of work. >=20 > Doug Yes that would be a lot of but it is the way we are doing. the upcoming sta= gedir will open the door to easy package splitting and then allow easily to split= gcc into something like gcc-libs and gcc package or something like that. regards, Bapt --kUBUi7JBpjcBtem/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/U4GMACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyeSACfSQfrOTPQG/yMf64Zxx3792U9 yMsAnjBdKuKnSziDgguZ3QddQfg73vyK =+Pb1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kUBUi7JBpjcBtem/-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 18:06:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D84C106566C; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:06:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4683C8FC1F; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so1769363wib.13 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:06:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=fKLMc5hUKk37hIg5NJ7wKyOXikEAdbYblB3N4jRGX6Q=; b=hwYr8GP0B4VlNIe7E7e8V0qTPBhRMhaME17B7a1jONlLMvzdhVWawlj93MefMZKjGo hTThF+04DPwnCuw14DmdKRGQjAzAIB9fwGq8/haqo3jXzBiYi7ftzyxNB2Net+FvIUOr KjQbdtxCVpWfjN9CmbGLNX8jxpBDrE7JHfYJ3MD7VyvU6/OsL8/FoUnR+ZZBxBjaK6dp fJLEzmvu+jNdNJG+CA+9dvIQo/i/G+FA8+weqRfcGvdAWi/nKNe6NCpW1vCA6ClL/1fd nGmLVKKFiHbEMhRiEF68Fqhd42E4dA20+5lBBRcLgDwGpy0CAWwv/HcyAM5VcCQh/5VC f5Hg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.14.193 with SMTP id r1mr14905530wic.13.1339351560184; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:06:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.155.4 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:06:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4FD40E60.50405@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:06:00 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: Doug Barton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Martin Matuska , FreeBSD ports list Subject: Re: Imagemagick: FAIL, now in Magick++/demo/analyze.sh X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:06:02 -0000 On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >> The new version fails in a new location, even with the default options. >> > > Was this an amd64 system? All of my i386 systems installed the new > ImageMagick cleanly, but my only amd64 system hit this. Never mind. I just had an i386 system fail. > -- > R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer > E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 18:41:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94969106566B; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:41:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028C98FC12; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:41:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Jun 2012 14:40:47 -0400 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BUL24403; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:40:46 -0400 Received: from 209-6-86-84.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.86.84]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Jun 2012 14:40:45 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20436.59944.132324.593718@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:40:40 -0400 To: Rainer Hurling In-Reply-To: <4FD4CC5A.1050107@gwdg.de> References: <4FD40E60.50405@FreeBSD.org> <4FD4CC5A.1050107@gwdg.de> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: FreeBSD ports list , Doug Barton , Martin Matuska , Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: Imagemagick: FAIL, now in Magick++/demo/analyze.sh X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:41:02 -0000 Rainer Hurling writes: > >> The new version fails in a new location, even with the default options. > > > > Was this an amd64 system? All of my i386 systems installed the new > > ImageMagick cleanly, but my only amd64 system hit this. > > Yes, for me too, it fails on CURRENT amd64 system. As of 20 minutes ago, ImageMagick-6.7.7.6 builds using clang and default options), installs, and passes the internal test suite on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Mar 11 08:20:02 EDT 2012 amd64 I haven't tried to _use_ the program, but then I rarely do. Respectfully, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 18:55:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BD21065673 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:55:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B2D8FC0A for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:55:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id VAA20682 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:55:37 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1SdnIW-00006Q-Lx for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:55:36 +0300 Message-ID: <4FD4EDA7.40703@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:55:35 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120503 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=X-VIET-VPS Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: pkg_delete and +DEINSTALL X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:55:39 -0000 While pkgng is growing momentum I have a small suggestion for outgoing pkg_* tools. It seems that pkg_delete performs something like exec(+DEINSTALL, ...). I think that it would be better to do exec(/bin/sh, +DEINSTALL, ...). Rationale: - no need to set x bit on +DEINSTALL - no need to allow exec on /var/db filesystem The problem is discovered by actually using noexec mount option. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 19:02:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CEF1065670; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:02:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF56B8FC18; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:02:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Jun 2012 15:02:20 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BUL25568; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:02:20 -0400 Received-SPF: None identity=pra; client-ip=209.6.86.84; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-sender="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Neutral identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.6.86.84; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-sender="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None identity=helo; client-ip=209.6.86.84; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-sender="postmaster@jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received: from 209-6-86-84.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.86.84]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Jun 2012 15:02:20 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20436.61243.426276.668523@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:02:19 -0400 To: "O. Hartmann" In-Reply-To: <4FD4D4F6.9090805@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <20120604110339.GA9426@equilibrium.bsdes.net> <4FD2D4CC.3080109@ateamsystems.com> <4FD3003C.4080109@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4FD352FF.9090101@ateamsystems.com> <4FD357F2.9090901@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4FD35905.9080500@ateamsystems.com> <20120610121210.3ce1bd9d@zelda.sugioarto.com> <20120610165455.1c59e8ae@zelda.sugioarto.com> <4FD4C0AC.4000802@yahoo.com> <4FD4D4F6.9090805@zedat.fu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Current FreeBSD , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ports FreeBSD Subject: WAS: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? New: port annoyance LibreOffice X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:02:21 -0000 O. Hartmann writes: > >> Among all the default problems with ports, libreoffice[1] adds to the > >> group of annoyances[2] at the moment. I don't know when I have seen > >> "portmaster -ad" run through successfully last time. I need more and > >> more "-x" options to exclude ports which fail to build. > >> > >> [1] german/libreoffice and libreoffice fails all the time in > >> (LOCALIZED_LANG is set to "de"): There is a known problem with libreoffice and boost, specifically a conflict between the boost port and the internal version. There is a work-around; however, at the moment the libreoffice maintainer does not have the time to rectify matters. See the recent/ongoing thread in either ports@ or office@ for more information. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 19:10:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653891065670; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:10:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5138FC0A; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:10:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so3714847bkv.13 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:10:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=AsyNwlkeubNkrhEsjXSLFiiod+Zk1kqFteH9GomG+PQ=; b=j+dS83hJ8/ZU660rBAi1YJ34Z+aWLQWQ4GusS3QjL/17F5tpcEGUixWanqECmMSzpR jIulHEdB8iLMEGjSli90+24uqWbU3v9pp+99ZHoIif/2susy8hxFfk22gAYU5z2aECZW GyVy2MKq07dDR8XfEFeSetym0r4H883S1q3uMCvzcXnsKxkUXRqaHEQXRkLasPKtCyXI d1U94T7SKTdAxNN9aVj7dTONj9j2OazNTRvMCn1nHHPrRcD+qZUde+KrG/ed00yTvAYl RflvE4nPJlIQAiUTxmSlfTeY1y5AQT2OoTsp/ulnAU6+PbNr+RVvWkkYjCCBI5oJNYRa swQQ== Received: by 10.204.154.193 with SMTP id p1mr9024891bkw.102.1339355448410; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:10:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.171.138 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:10:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FD4EDA7.40703@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FD4EDA7.40703@FreeBSD.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:10:18 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 84ZaHAyABORWgGkzAq1-nblLsR8 Message-ID: To: Andriy Gapon , Florent Thoumie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg_delete and +DEINSTALL X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:10:50 -0000 On 10 June 2012 19:55, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > While pkgng is growing momentum I have a small suggestion for outgoing pkg_* tools. > It seems that pkg_delete performs something like exec(+DEINSTALL, ...). > I think that it would be better to do exec(/bin/sh, +DEINSTALL, ...). > Rationale: > - no need to set x bit on +DEINSTALL > - no need to allow exec on /var/db filesystem > The problem is discovered by actually using noexec mount option. I don't think this is a bad idea, so I've copied in flz, the de-facto pkg_install maintainer.... .... but don't forget that pkg_install is very close to death! Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 19:46:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8277D106566C; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:46:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from florent.thoumie@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A7C8FC1B; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so3728766bkv.13 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:46:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4lVsgN418YtvuQDsO69yeeI916SsXvzo6NPNE2ZTMzM=; b=MnYNPQF2SCQIgJGFyt/pK6ZCPbqS2qeJvkBciIpLkgLL53H5eTlYc4hiaqpLpKNrTN /p+VsdbwzDW+Ursu6peFX2CvIVMpy3NMgV+JVsg5H8gvmtN/Uwf35kDSK5kae4hDtRj+ aYN7/OCE0qGCbqdeV3nEM5JuL2cBouayEqxyLysFU687g9YpxFZ0BXC+zd92Vh/2xj6f ArkL98lHGQZl6e4UbMmdCVaP9K3jyBXS3KM8rt26Nz1Qo4oJf8udbKjjR/EXxI0J/kyw XPe22r9xetzOihWUfa19dOJeKyd3HLY0DyA8Bpa79u6CVGa6sfsbE8I6bnKoDsW3L1JT cGbw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.128.201 with SMTP id l9mr9318152bks.68.1339357601477; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:46:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: florent.thoumie@gmail.com Received: by 10.205.116.145 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:46:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4FD4EDA7.40703@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:46:41 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: QtoJvhs-6VroW4Ul2HGiK0vCc4o Message-ID: From: Florent Thoumie To: Chris Rees Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: pkg_delete and +DEINSTALL X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:46:43 -0000 On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > On 10 June 2012 19:55, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> While pkgng is growing momentum I have a small suggestion for outgoing pkg_* tools. >> It seems that pkg_delete performs something like exec(+DEINSTALL, ...). >> I think that it would be better to do exec(/bin/sh, +DEINSTALL, ...). >> Rationale: >> - no need to set x bit on +DEINSTALL >> - no need to allow exec on /var/db filesystem >> The problem is discovered by actually using noexec mount option. > > I don't think this is a bad idea, so I've copied in flz, the de-facto > pkg_install maintainer.... > > .... but don't forget that pkg_install is very close to death! Aye. I've just handed my src commit bit for safekeeping but if you're willing to put in the work, the plan sounds good assuming all scripts have been rewritten in shell (for those that weren't already). -- Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 20:02:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D52106566C; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:02:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879028FC14; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so3735023bkv.13 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 13:02:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=+4aWWPtiTJoE8/cEh5/ebpnU1rCLqMxk1mWk8Hs2CXU=; b=RK1Ax1SFZ7XOojXva0R82M3KJsnHwBFDy5BJpihIi1YKojDazeyVSVVFqiCDS4n353 8SnWoD3ImY8d/Gu3rEPseAdyc8yaW0bYyBtfn7uuNShXyJ2FHN9tfOr8Kc1JwwhoXLqV Mh2JjcNQbHxGl/YqyYjNgMWXOIYHKeBb2LDJXM5L42mpfht2tiSr2OVKiFHG9eUWqpih zoyLHqDediIhV2hIJooHpUVGVqFkh0RdhqQYY0EN08fp/gJgj5sEcBydsBr5Dkq31LSt C9PdPbkz6RfbPOsebuqRyyiiTVULZwyhgr686mtitzCPKy5zVGK1TUfgQRVxUtg+bitH G+wQ== Received: by 10.204.153.15 with SMTP id i15mr9351171bkw.74.1339358545238; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 13:02:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.171.138 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 13:01:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4FD4EDA7.40703@FreeBSD.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:01:54 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1-dJnpmaN-aAnvoTNiMmqyYokzY Message-ID: To: Florent Thoumie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: pkg_delete and +DEINSTALL X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:02:27 -0000 On 10 June 2012 20:46, Florent Thoumie wrote: > On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Chris Rees wrote: >> On 10 June 2012 19:55, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> >>> While pkgng is growing momentum I have a small suggestion for outgoing pkg_* tools. >>> It seems that pkg_delete performs something like exec(+DEINSTALL, ...). >>> I think that it would be better to do exec(/bin/sh, +DEINSTALL, ...). >>> Rationale: >>> - no need to set x bit on +DEINSTALL >>> - no need to allow exec on /var/db filesystem >>> The problem is discovered by actually using noexec mount option. >> >> I don't think this is a bad idea, so I've copied in flz, the de-facto >> pkg_install maintainer.... >> >> .... but don't forget that pkg_install is very close to death! > > Aye. I've just handed my src commit bit for safekeeping but if you're > willing to put in the work, the plan sounds good assuming all scripts > have been rewritten in shell (for those that weren't already). Good point-- I think I nuked the last remaining csh ones, but there might be a few... Be sure to grep the ports tree first! Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 20:10:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E91106566B for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:10:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803988FC14 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:10:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD93D23C61 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:10:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E71B9D23C60 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:10:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FD4FF32.1060402@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:10:26 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: port unmaintained since 2005? drop it? misc/gpt* X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:10:30 -0000 Two unmaintained ports, nothing depends on them, and upstream has not updated source since 2004, ftp server unresponsive. (gpt32: misc/gpt also unmaintained since 2005. ftp server mentioned doesn't respond (ftp.freebsd.org has distfile), upstream unmaintained since 2004, and upstream points to a different distfile (with different checksum and same version number), mentions an alpha version 4.0. nothing depends on this (it is to install 'globus'), which I don't see in ports. ps for misc/gpt has different errors, make -- - 7.4 i386, one on 9.0 amd64 (did I say unmaintained port? ) I don't think anyone has attempted to use this since 4.x days. any objection to me marking these deprecated unless someone steps up to maintain them? (Mel: looks like you tried to offer submitter a fix, but I think this is a lost cause) jan 21 pr: -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 20:16:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352CB1065679 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:16:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11EF8FC16 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:16:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5AKG8cB078090 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:16:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q5AKG8Re078087 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:16:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:16:08 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:16:08 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Subject: NOPORTDOCS and NOPORTEXAMPLES X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:16:09 -0000 So references to NOPORTDOCS should be replaced with references to PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS now? Why that but not NOPORTEXAMPLES? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 20:18:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16D21065676 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:18:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adams-freebsd@ateamsystems.com) Received: from fss.sandiego.ateamservers.com (fss.sandiego.ateamservers.com [69.55.229.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03198FC12 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.15.220] (unknown [118.175.84.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fss.sandiego.ateamservers.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F0F7B9F23 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:18:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FD50115.1070904@ateamsystems.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 03:18:29 +0700 From: Adam Strohl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Retro-actively adjust port's deinstall operations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:18:41 -0000 Hello, I've just submitted a PR to update the CouchDB port from 1.1.0 to 1.2.0: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=168923 Background: CouchDB's local.ini file stores all overridden options and default.ini the defaults, similar to /etc/rc.conf & /etc/defaults/rc.conf. While updating the port I discovered that the existing port lists local.ini directly in pkg-plist instead of installing a local.ini.sample file and doing proper comparisons/tests for changes. So it blindly removes this file on deinstall. If my diff in the above PR is accepted when people uninstall the existing 1.1.0 port it will remove their config file. The new port will see that there is no local.ini and copy in the sample for them but this is really awful for obvious reasons. Is there a way to reach people with a warning about this _before_ they uninstall/reinstall so they can back up the file before upgrading? Or is /usr/ports/UPDATING it? (and do I need to do anything special to have this listed there?) P.S. Any other feedback on the PR/diff is welcome. -- Adam Strohl http://www.ateamsystems.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 20:23:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6422106566B for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:23:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7792C8FC1B for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D8D621C53 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:23:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A0B9621C51 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:23:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FD5022B.9070705@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:23:07 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <4FD4FF32.1060402@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4FD4FF32.1060402@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: port unmaintained since 2005? drop it? misc/gpt* X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:23:16 -0000 On 6/10/12 4:10 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > Two unmaintained ports, nothing depends on them, and upstream has not > updated source since 2004, ftp server unresponsive. > > > (gpt32: misc/gpt also unmaintained since 2005. > > > ftp server mentioned doesn't respond (ftp.freebsd.org has distfile), > upstream unmaintained since 2004, and upstream points to a different > distfile (with different checksum and same version number), mentions > an alpha version 4.0. > > nothing depends on this (it is to install 'globus'), which I don't see > in ports. > and, in fact: grep globus /usr/ports/MOVED net/globus4||2008-12-07|Has expired: Has been broken for more than 6 months -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 20:38:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E9B1065674 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:38:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9638FC0A for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:38:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so3749342bkv.13 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 13:38:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XQv22gmR+sjbV2TpkaVPCGhEHpQ8wD5swbTGzFQ17pk=; b=wUUUEXPQABd0aOo4TzhqunDH8UZw/dFnSsgoUROcoPpKWklm7DmmIBk5RSnLeCiHRi XBeaTz6KEU+ZoED2sUBF8V8TO2HM9imj4jTs6I/9bHaiFz/rDZgTVeqOpG4l5CgtCVGi sZnZlzZDuqDKpFK3+qUzycXF0na2zLTa/vfykpdgBkOxJjOd/7SOwvozAvIAgj8Hw2Zj 2wrf5gCSJEs7HzoA6hepCWctckCIg0ON3N9YXOjsbvye5vMcKM7NzhS3rUSYQm1RzDos qJ17ZkeTD5eE6ryqg3iRG9Y867f6HxaGdtG8875J6KbxdanUoBy1Ce/OrVhaTWTjKwpK Enrg== Received: by 10.204.153.15 with SMTP id i15mr9383615bkw.74.1339360731479; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 13:38:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.171.138 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 13:38:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FD50115.1070904@ateamsystems.com> References: <4FD50115.1070904@ateamsystems.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:38:21 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: g_9lMJFzzXPB0tkxBBi6wivLdaU Message-ID: To: Adam Strohl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Retro-actively adjust port's deinstall operations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:38:53 -0000 On 10 June 2012 21:18, Adam Strohl wrote: > Hello, > > I've just submitted a PR to update the CouchDB port from 1.1.0 to 1.2.0: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D168923 > > Background: CouchDB's local.ini file stores all overridden options and > default.ini the defaults, similar to /etc/rc.conf & /etc/defaults/rc.conf= . > > While updating the port I discovered that the existing port lists local.i= ni > directly in pkg-plist instead of installing a local.ini.sample file and > doing proper comparisons/tests for changes. =A0So it blindly removes this= file > on deinstall. > > If my diff in the above PR is accepted when people uninstall the existing > 1.1.0 port it will remove their config file. =A0The new port will see tha= t > there is no local.ini and copy in the sample for them but this is really > awful for obvious reasons. > > Is there a way to reach people with a warning about this _before_ they > uninstall/reinstall so they can back up the file before upgrading? > > Or is /usr/ports/UPDATING it? (and do I need to do anything special to ha= ve > this listed there?) I'm sorry, you're rather stuffed there. The same happened with a port I took over a while ago. Actually if the older version doesn't install a .sample file (as it doesn't), you could put a big warning in for it: .include .if exists(${PREFIX}/whateverconfigfile) && !exists(${PREFIX}/whateverconfigfile.sample) IGNORE=3D Please see UPDATING note {date} .endif Stick a note in UPDATING (perhaps like 20110815), and send a HEADSUP to por= ts@: BEFORE you deinstall couchdb, make sure you take a backup of default.ini, because the port will clobber it. I've grabbed your PR and will investigate tomorrow. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 21:11:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCAF106566B for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:11:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@e-e.com) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.pub.dw.redsrci.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259C38FC0C for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D816F5335; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:11:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=e-e.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :user-agent:from:from:subject:subject:date:date:references :in-reply-to:message-id:received:received:received; s=ee; t= 1339362682; x=1341177082; bh=h1bq8wgJ34DyW0rc93JHGhIqUmgVvFfGVDN MyNPSNUs=; b=cHylPPgJsM4RpcVQv8HRIBxAWuhX78TpADHms5nYwYWXk9S+P91 EXO29My5gw95rgDTsqLuiv0OOqjpglaMbR1Fl6yLyA30HCH36F7Ns7EkJn3cXa6u CFyOxShskeTVlApkrxWHNVFigVndt0d7re+X4EnyGlLHnxVWWHnWAGG8= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.dw.redsrci.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YxAU3KqO3st2; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:11:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDF26F52AC; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:11:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 66.122.76.184 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhelfman) by mail.experts-exchange.com with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:11:21 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:11:21 -0700 From: "Jason Helfman" To: "Warren Block" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NOPORTDOCS and NOPORTEXAMPLES X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:11:28 -0000 > So references to NOPORTDOCS should be replaced with references to > PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS now? Why that but not NOPORTEXAMPLES? You can use PORT_OPTIONS:MEXAMPLES for this case. I believe I did this recently in www/flot -jgh From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 21:27:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769B2106566B for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:27:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adams-freebsd@ateamsystems.com) Received: from fss.sandiego.ateamservers.com (fss.sandiego.ateamservers.com [69.55.229.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AEB58FC0A for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.15.220] (unknown [118.175.84.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fss.sandiego.ateamservers.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E43C8B9F24 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:27:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FD51147.3040004@ateamsystems.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 04:27:35 +0700 From: Adam Strohl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4FD50115.1070904@ateamsystems.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Retro-actively adjust port's deinstall operations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:27:46 -0000 On 6/11/2012 3:38, Chris Rees wrote: > Actually if the older version doesn't install a .sample file (as it > doesn't), you could put a big warning in for it: > > .include > > .if exists(${PREFIX}/whateverconfigfile)&& > !exists(${PREFIX}/whateverconfigfile.sample) > IGNORE= Please see UPDATING note {date} > .endif Where/when would this trigger? > > Stick a note in UPDATING (perhaps like 20110815), and send a HEADSUP to ports@: > > BEFORE you deinstall couchdb, make sure you take a backup of > default.ini, because the port will clobber it. I'm assuming this was a typo but just in case: Its the local.ini file that is the issue (and contains the overrides against default.ini as well as the admin account usernames and password hashes). > > I've grabbed your PR and will investigate tomorrow. Cool, thanks! -- Adam Strohl http://www.ateamsystems.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 21:30:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B761065670 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:30:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryan@shatow.net) Received: from secure.xzibition.com (secure.xzibition.com [173.160.118.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BD08FC08 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:30:34 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=shatow.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sweb; b=T97mfD +R5NT3CnlSGUgTNG0f9Tmy27AYPQp4vuJfydd6kKQ6kmIFVVGfFuK508r5oXRoDF 9bTi/CZujBAi9rzdNSPKfPZN2/jd9DJo7c2yOre5158NMwxG/pNiLMhxoCHjHyRF 33Ip0hOvVkWu/6edYZ3SmuyolZC3MpS8PSnLQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=shatow.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sweb; bh=KUswo2Pj7USB O4UGbeuY+F+VdgsymdoeZ1hCnac5y3c=; b=BC4xQqn78UY6gR3kFJnI3MQKQXKa Rf7WJFsfoGakhKzEdj6Y0Artx7Lj2Vx9zMIGHub2R2JDq22JqPf05ajqvXLjOZj+ 0VuI62dkPZSahPZTQdRvKD/SpNVYBB1Xj9jBcswS3VqKn0X11uFAAubpjUTaJHPv 3qqanOC+XRlV7w4= Received: (qmail 25146 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2012 16:30:27 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.1.87?) (bryan@shatow.net@10.10.1.87) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 10 Jun 2012 16:30:27 -0500 Message-ID: <4FD511F0.50607@shatow.net> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:30:24 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Strohl References: <4FD50115.1070904@ateamsystems.com> <4FD51147.3040004@ateamsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <4FD51147.3040004@ateamsystems.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=3C9B0CF9; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Retro-actively adjust port's deinstall operations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:30:35 -0000 On 6/10/2012 4:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote: > Where/when would this trigger? This could block the upgrade as soon as they try to build it if they already have the ini and do not have a sample file. Regards, Bryan Drewery From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 21:32:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D111065672 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:32:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adams-freebsd@ateamsystems.com) Received: from fss.sandiego.ateamservers.com (fss.sandiego.ateamservers.com [69.55.229.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADF38FC08 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.15.220] (unknown [118.175.84.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fss.sandiego.ateamservers.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC826B9F22 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:32:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FD51278.10109@ateamsystems.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 04:32:40 +0700 From: Adam Strohl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4FD50115.1070904@ateamsystems.com> <4FD51147.3040004@ateamsystems.com> <4FD511F0.50607@shatow.net> In-Reply-To: <4FD511F0.50607@shatow.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Retro-actively adjust port's deinstall operations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:32:51 -0000 On 6/11/2012 4:30, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 6/10/2012 4:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote: >> Where/when would this trigger? > > This could block the upgrade as soon as they try to build it if they > already have the ini and do not have a sample file. The issue is that most things (ie; people or portupgrade) do a deinstall first, then a reinstall. By the time the Makefile gets called for reinstall its too late and in my testing everything is ignored for deinstall because it uses the package's archived actions. Or would this somehow hook on make deinstall too? -- Adam Strohl http://www.ateamsystems.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 21:36:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FAF1065670 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:36:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryan@shatow.net) Received: from secure.xzibition.com (secure.xzibition.com [173.160.118.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B1A8FC14 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:36:04 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=shatow.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sweb; b=Q6STJg P9Wczhh5VfFEqbKd6j/jqyh4sC/poFk2J2FSwrg1cqdt6EfiL/NdOrZ3u17hbfG9 sbKPBhStKfoB4ElcfxR/ocB5buzJYyXtJxn4tBNit9UxOQnvK2KwrXaE+OdCZ/rP DOHJXN8HR59KNc2St6lwwy4iFYT5SlpxPRAbc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=shatow.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sweb; bh=8LHxCSbv1+sA FmHSeE4szqUDUsF+b1LASTMv98QqYFg=; b=my4Jxqnm36JQxdclIBVu4L4Deufx bDNUMWkG/nWnMEGBLir/h65RouWh8KaK7g3J5xreqP3t0TW7jnzyO52h0PUUHWgz pOpQcy4CHQ0RkqnrFafEI++T1yE4StOfkK5DauXwA0WOrrMzk0svYEbdrNQlZbCW XKfWDdUptH22GaI= Received: (qmail 46215 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2012 16:36:02 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.1.87?) (bryan@shatow.net@10.10.1.87) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 10 Jun 2012 16:36:02 -0500 Message-ID: <4FD51341.1080104@shatow.net> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:36:01 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Strohl References: <4FD50115.1070904@ateamsystems.com> <4FD51147.3040004@ateamsystems.com> <4FD511F0.50607@shatow.net> <4FD51278.10109@ateamsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <4FD51278.10109@ateamsystems.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=3C9B0CF9; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Retro-actively adjust port's deinstall operations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:36:04 -0000 On 6/10/2012 4:32 PM, Adam Strohl wrote: > On 6/11/2012 4:30, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> On 6/10/2012 4:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote: >>> Where/when would this trigger? >> >> This could block the upgrade as soon as they try to build it if they >> already have the ini and do not have a sample file. > > The issue is that most things (ie; people or portupgrade) do a deinstall > first, then a reinstall. By the time the Makefile gets called for > reinstall its too late and in my testing everything is ignored for > deinstall because it uses the package's archived actions. > > Or would this somehow hook on make deinstall too? portupgrade builds the port first, then deinstalls and installs. So I think crees' suggestion will work. Not sure about portmaster, but I imagine it would do the same, as it could take *hours* to build and you would be left without the port in the meantime. Regards, Bryan Drewery From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 21:38:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C3A106564A for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:38:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adams-freebsd@ateamsystems.com) Received: from fss.sandiego.ateamservers.com (fss.sandiego.ateamservers.com [69.55.229.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A228FC08 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.15.220] (unknown [118.175.84.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fss.sandiego.ateamservers.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC034B9F22 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:38:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FD513CA.6040804@ateamsystems.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 04:38:18 +0700 From: Adam Strohl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4FD50115.1070904@ateamsystems.com> <4FD51147.3040004@ateamsystems.com> <4FD511F0.50607@shatow.net> <4FD51278.10109@ateamsystems.com> <4FD51341.1080104@shatow.net> In-Reply-To: <4FD51341.1080104@shatow.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Retro-actively adjust port's deinstall operations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:38:29 -0000 On 6/11/2012 4:36, Bryan Drewery wrote: > portupgrade builds the port first, then deinstalls and installs. > So I think crees' suggestion will work. Ah yes, that's right! It only deinstalls after a successful build! Excellent. > Not sure about portmaster, but I imagine it would do the same, as it > could take *hours* to build and you would be left without the port in > the meantime. Good call. -- Adam Strohl http://www.ateamsystems.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 00:05:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CCBD1065674 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:05:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9688FC16 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5B05nbO078936; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:05:49 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q5B05nH0078933; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:05:49 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:05:49 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Jason Helfman In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:05:49 -0600 (MDT) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NOPORTDOCS and NOPORTEXAMPLES X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:05:52 -0000 On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Jason Helfman wrote: >> So references to NOPORTDOCS should be replaced with references to >> PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS now? Why that but not NOPORTEXAMPLES? > > You can use PORT_OPTIONS:MEXAMPLES for this case. > > I believe I did this recently in www/flot But only after bsd.port.options.mk is included. Here's what I was trying to do: .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS} OPTIONS_DEFINE+= REFDOCS REFDOCS_DESC= Install the reference documents OPTIONS_DEFAULT+= REFDOCS .endif .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MEXAMPLES} OPTIONS_DEFINE+= EXAMPLES EXAMPLES_DESC= Install the example code OPTIONS_DEFAULT+= EXAMPLES .endif .include ...which doesn't work because DOCS and EXAMPLES don't exist yet. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 00:26:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124D91065672 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:26:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@e-e.com) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.pub.dw.redsrci.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2778FC0A for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94EB36F5420; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:26:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=e-e.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :user-agent:from:from:subject:subject:date:date:references :in-reply-to:message-id:received:received:received; s=ee; t= 1339374376; x=1341188776; bh=BsNVUFOu1yEF2eCGtxSe8n2C1mNEpkXv5EG MZm5c4M8=; b=rbNa3yc8XdpAExY4+j93WrU7PMFfRsO+/wM9XZiEWt7XIDWjxt+ u2HAIz9D7+TMjPqLP7MX68nDLrsxtYV2rAq4ljcwwkIeEaFb06oYsQZep/M4JNrt 7JbvJF9r+VBThwzRo1zo3o3RFDgIB4J2wimIBAd2jFRwZwg1pyeNRNY4= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.dw.redsrci.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (mail.dw.redsrci.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Jdfk4ppigaZ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:26:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dw.redsrci.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B7A6F3FA6; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:26:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 66.122.76.184 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhelfman) by mail.experts-exchange.com with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:26:16 -0700 Message-ID: <13629e017227e9bd2be8635d0365a8af.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:26:16 -0700 From: "Jason Helfman" To: "Warren Block" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NOPORTDOCS and NOPORTEXAMPLES X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:26:17 -0000 > On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Jason Helfman wrote: > >>> So references to NOPORTDOCS should be replaced with references to >>> PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS now? Why that but not NOPORTEXAMPLES? >> >> You can use PORT_OPTIONS:MEXAMPLES for this case. >> >> I believe I did this recently in www/flot > > But only after bsd.port.options.mk is included. Here's what I was > trying to do: > > .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS} > OPTIONS_DEFINE+= REFDOCS > REFDOCS_DESC= Install the reference documents > OPTIONS_DEFAULT+= REFDOCS > .endif > > .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MEXAMPLES} > OPTIONS_DEFINE+= EXAMPLES > EXAMPLES_DESC= Install the example code > OPTIONS_DEFAULT+= EXAMPLES > .endif > > .include > > ...which doesn't work because DOCS and EXAMPLES don't exist yet. > > True. I should've mentioned some updated documentation here regarding options, if you didn't know about it already: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-options.html If anything doesn't make sense please raise the issue, and possibly send in a documentation patch if you have time. White space patch doesn't count ;) -jgh From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 00:32:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F0E106566B; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:32:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78ED48FC0C; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:32:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so1912602wib.13 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:32:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Eweta3Sa+zyeC/qkwtrTTfEpmGrr2HViVg00B0Lb0qc=; b=mXkL96G4kL4gPRpw+zxDdZ+aptRoHHDQHiZ0YlJKXyYvA+5ALAw6V0f4KfE/83OV+m 0MymdhdOqrYhjfTW5/wA9ByANmN56I2EgqWTSXfprxzuLJq8BFkYI3RNW19kpgJse64m jr9tRHoqd2drK94ndSoD0r+1TXQNLAoXNvz2CB5NH8tt50bbqzHbcA4v6Z9Mloi0KdzW DdclTOV2qU4Ay9/JEGGkXJ+I39QFXfJdKPx9YqxMJxSqqyqcdkIOp/xyxZGpqfDVOpQR mq5XUNqYBMGqJXRu0X8MXdtTd/CaSfpsVWh8Nb7TJ6IwwIFl1fhyYFXyYymC8exMqhJn NOQw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.78.233 with SMTP id e9mr16420884wix.5.1339374769137; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.155.4 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:32:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20436.59944.132324.593718@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <4FD40E60.50405@FreeBSD.org> <4FD4CC5A.1050107@gwdg.de> <20436.59944.132324.593718@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:32:49 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: Robert Huff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Rainer Hurling , Martin Matuska , FreeBSD ports list , Doug Barton Subject: Re: Imagemagick: FAIL, now in Magick++/demo/analyze.sh X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:32:56 -0000 On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Robert Huff wrote: > > Rainer Hurling writes: > >> =A0>> The new version fails in a new location, even with the default opt= ions. >> =A0> >> =A0> Was this an amd64 system? All of my i386 systems installed the new >> =A0> ImageMagick cleanly, but my only amd64 system hit this. >> >> =A0Yes, for me too, it fails on CURRENT amd64 system. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0As of 20 minutes ago, ImageMagick-6.7.7.6 builds using cla= ng > and default options), installs, and passes the internal test suite > on > > FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Mar 11 08:20:02 EDT 2012 =A0amd64 > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I haven't tried to _use_ the program, but then I rarely do= . Don't know about others, but i am still using gcc. In any case, this won't show up with defaults as the default is to NOT run tests. Tests were disabled by default last October. the commit message gave no reason for why. Of course, this means Doug must be wrong about using defaults. --=20 R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 00:38:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7171E106567A; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:38:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5406D163655; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:37:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FD53DE2.3090908@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:37:54 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Oberman References: <4FD40E60.50405@FreeBSD.org> <4FD4CC5A.1050107@gwdg.de> <20436.59944.132324.593718@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD ports list , Robert Huff , Martin Matuska , Rainer Hurling Subject: Re: Imagemagick: FAIL, now in Magick++/demo/analyze.sh X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:38:17 -0000 On 06/10/2012 17:32, Kevin Oberman wrote: > Of course, this means Doug must be wrong about using defaults. .... or, it means that Doug did 'make rmconfig' followed by 'make config' where I enabled only the tests. I thought that was obvious from context, but I'm happy to clarify. Meanwhile, yes, the system I built it on last night was a 10-current amd64. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 01:38:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F388E106564A; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:38:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08178FC20; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:38:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id q5B1cBJC013263 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:38:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.14.2/Submit) with UUCP id q5B1cBqs013262; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:38:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA14862; Sun, 10 Jun 12 18:33:05 PDT Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:31:54 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: scheidell@freebsd.org Message-Id: <4fd5acfa.idvDPcWpdoIIkuEZ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4FD4FF32.1060402@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4FD4FF32.1060402@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port unmaintained since 2005? drop it? misc/gpt* X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:38:13 -0000 Michael Scheidell wrote: > Two unmaintained ports, nothing depends on them, and upstream has > not updated source since 2004, ftp server unresponsive. > > > (gpt32: misc/gpt also unmaintained since 2005. > > > ftp server mentioned doesn't respond (ftp.freebsd.org has distfile), > upstream unmaintained since 2004, and upstream points to a different > distfile (with different checksum and same version number), mentions > an alpha version 4.0. These are originally from NCSA, but the website mentioned in the pkg-descr (http://www.gridpackagingtools.org/) now seems to be promoting some kind of diet/nutritional approach. The only connection to "middleware" that immediately comes to mind is that such sites tend to be frequented by those concerned about excessive weight around their middle :) Dunno what (if anything) they are currently good for, but it seems that, at a minimum, the PORTVERSION and/or MASTER_SITES -- and the pkg-descr -- need to be updated. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 01:40:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB881065670 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:40:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094FC8FC16 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:40:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.37]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Jun 2012 21:40:31 -0400 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BNM32354; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:40:31 -0400 Received: from 209-6-86-84.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.86.84]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Jun 2012 21:40:31 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <20437.19594.994924.903270@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:40:26 -0400 To: FreeBSD ports list In-Reply-To: References: <4FD40E60.50405@FreeBSD.org> <4FD4CC5A.1050107@gwdg.de> <20436.59944.132324.593718@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: Re: Imagemagick: FAIL, now in Magick++/demo/analyze.sh X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:40:32 -0000 Kevin Oberman writes: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0As of 20 minutes ago, ImageMagick-6.7.7.6 builds us= ing clang > > and default options), installs, and passes the internal test suite= > > on > > In any case, this won't show up with defaults as the default is to N= OT > run tests. Tests were disabled by default last October. the commit > message gave no reason for why. =09I ran the tests using "make test". When I said "defaults", I _meant_ "defaults". =09=09=09=09Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 01:56:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40071065679 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:56:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74498FC0A for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfy7 with SMTP id fy7so2248538vcb.13 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:56:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yR4Fla4EEIDx4G/nwdHObVmZXtPdEXyoq22xxwH7e8s=; b=tmfAg+1MLqS3yneN+ELVBa8MDV23d3ozZmd8gwbh/mNWEVk3Z2juj+M0GKKo6kQlFp Gd7hKpw0es+CrdnBo42gjIt4rTu+Xbj1NuISH5JtrBE5JlCCKDiE+Lagm25xES7rcklI dFlN5NSgEtAleW5pEqNDXUqaXgndmqANvYNtgmXD9Z6C33CDZx1RlG5UKAeCpjHJYLBA gM/53hz94PYsEV7fT989x3eIZzlOqUgV/npAwauw3vzS8uy8J6EXis0bk4RTK3rQybfj 5WUzBl2KsOhJfblTkZR5cSA2/6z36254gJc3QjKI9VDo6BAw2LXEDQxQDUN3GDYKsKnH MMvQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.88.176 with SMTP id bh16mr9614095vdb.132.1339379759960; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:55:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.113.97 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:55:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4fd5acfa.idvDPcWpdoIIkuEZ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4FD4FF32.1060402@FreeBSD.org> <4fd5acfa.idvDPcWpdoIIkuEZ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:55:59 -0400 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: port unmaintained since 2005? drop it? misc/gpt* X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:56:01 -0000 On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:31 AM, wrote: > Michael Scheidell wrote: > >> Two unmaintained ports, nothing depends on them, and upstream has >> not updated source since 2004, ftp server unresponsive. >> >> >> (gpt32: misc/gpt also unmaintained since 2005. >> >> >> ftp server mentioned doesn't respond (ftp.freebsd.org has distfile), >> upstream unmaintained since 2004, and upstream points to a different >> distfile (with different checksum and same version number), mentions >> an alpha version 4.0. > > These are originally from NCSA, but the website mentioned in > the pkg-descr (http://www.gridpackagingtools.org/) now seems to > be promoting some kind of diet/nutritional approach. =A0The only > connection to "middleware" that immediately comes to mind is that > such sites tend to be frequented by those concerned about excessive > weight around their middle :) > > Dunno what (if anything) they are currently good for, but it seems > that, at a minimum, the PORTVERSION and/or MASTER_SITES -- and the > pkg-descr -- need to be updated. I would have to think that that is a remnant of a project that is no longer running. The current owners of that domain are squatters: Registrant ID:DOT-SY49XY2F9J0P Registrant Name:Domain Admin Registrant Organization:Maripon Management, Inc. Registrant Street1:Office 2, 456-458 Strand Registrant Street2:WC2R 0DZ Registrant Street3: Registrant City:London Registrant State/Province:uk Registrant Postal Code:n/a Registrant Country:GB Registrant Phone:+44.12053169373 Registrant Phone Ext.: Registrant FAX: Registrant FAX Ext.: Registrant Email:support@internet-guide.biz From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 03:14:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22757106564A; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 03:14:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847A08FC0C; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 03:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so1969299wib.13 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:14:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1LP2PS5uXWp3Zhr57Bsh2wh9melomkXz6c0hL9zm2PY=; b=h29601fgi/I0qOhG7pCh3syAl3bEaWNF5isW8Sqe9f1a3RleKdEEfHY/FnO5aufRmx ekULTEiUcYvajX8coxxUUGeIVTC2/EeA4uf5VCQwOhdzHqlyCYGzWCxud9rKpSkJhyk8 VUKaGooUvSN5gnmQEr4o9qNmseWVCd2ESY7trNZxsVn9nduexAPMZb6M26JUzACnoQkR van7/dnzf8bHXMP1D1bfTeZI2CXpczl7t9FXOZ9NjHzlRmaZLXKXUoNmXse5ppRoweIA m+HskW+pdKiRNb2r/5H/LCsMOL5ue5/K5hiuoYQtikyow14Vi3BhA60eZV0WUeXk+ILi frBw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.98.201 with SMTP id ek9mr17305946wib.7.1339384440382; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:14:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.102.4 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:14:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:14:00 -0400 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: scheidell@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: port unmaintained since 2005? drop it? misc/gpt* X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 03:14:02 -0000 > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:31 AM, wrote: > > Michael Scheidell wrote: > > > >> Two unmaintained ports, nothing depends on them, and upstream has > >> not updated source since 2004, ftp server unresponsive. > >> > >> > >> (gpt32: misc/gpt also unmaintained since 2005. > >> > >> > >> ftp server mentioned doesn't respond (ftp.freebsd.org has distfile), > >> upstream unmaintained since 2004, and upstream points to a different > >> distfile (with different checksum and same version number), mentions > >> an alpha version 4.0. > > > > These are originally from NCSA, but the website mentioned in > > the pkg-descr (http://www.gridpackagingtools.org/) now seems to > > be promoting some kind of diet/nutritional approach. =C2=A0The only > > connection to "middleware" that immediately comes to mind is that > > such sites tend to be frequented by those concerned about excessive > > weight around their middle :) > > > > Dunno what (if anything) they are currently good for, but it seems > > that, at a minimum, the PORTVERSION and/or MASTER_SITES -- and the > > pkg-descr -- need to be updated. > > I would have to think that that is a remnant of a project that is no > longer running. The current owners of that domain are squatters: The distribution files are at: ftp://ftp.ncsa.uiuc.edu/aces/gpt/releases and the homepage is: http://grid.ncsa.illinois.edu/gpt/ (And Globus is at: http://www.globus.org/toolkit/ ) Time to determine this: < 1 min. b. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 04:30:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6796F106564A for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 04:30:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9E28FC1B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 04:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5B4UFkQ036349 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 04:30:15 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5B4UFXd036340 for ports@Freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 04:30:15 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:30:01 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MmQIYbZiCoQ2kDro" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Subject: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 04:30:16 -0000 --MmQIYbZiCoQ2kDro Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi all, In the ports tree we lack a unique identifier, while we could live without it until now, it is more than needed for 2 upcoming features: pkgng and stage directory support. unique means something that will always be the same what ever the options are and what ever the runtime they use are. But also means unique in term of in the whole ports no other package will share its identifier. currently the only equivalent of this in the ports tree is the origin of a package, which will no more be unique with the upcoming sub package support (coming along with stage directory) aka 1 origin to produce n package. UNIQUENAME and LATEST_LINK fails in that area because they both can change according to the runtime: py27- for example which will become py30- if you change the default python. LATEST_LINK by default also append the PKGNAMEPREFIX which some ports can be really creative with. should we introduce something new, should we fix one of the above? do you have any suggestion? regards, Bapt --MmQIYbZiCoQ2kDro Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/VdEkACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExnggCeJtw6PrJXq1mlGIXYPC0xbRb4 rkkAn0vGaDS9SEd7QUk1uhycl7wYqEaQ =yZi+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MmQIYbZiCoQ2kDro-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 05:18:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C720F1065672 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:18:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F818FC0C; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:18:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5B5I2Qh084048; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:18:02 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5B5I2IS084047; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:18:02 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 07:17:59 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Warren Block Message-ID: <20120611051759.GQ60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="l8yJEXo8J9fv7OFY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Jason Helfman Subject: Re: NOPORTDOCS and NOPORTEXAMPLES X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:18:02 -0000 --l8yJEXo8J9fv7OFY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 06:05:49PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Jason Helfman wrote: >=20 > >> So references to NOPORTDOCS should be replaced with references to > >> PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS now? Why that but not NOPORTEXAMPLES? > > > > You can use PORT_OPTIONS:MEXAMPLES for this case. > > > > I believe I did this recently in www/flot >=20 > But only after bsd.port.options.mk is included. Here's what I was=20 > trying to do: >=20 > .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS} > OPTIONS_DEFINE+=3D REFDOCS > REFDOCS_DESC=3D Install the reference documents > OPTIONS_DEFAULT+=3D REFDOCS > .endif >=20 > .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MEXAMPLES} > OPTIONS_DEFINE+=3D EXAMPLES > EXAMPLES_DESC=3D Install the example code > OPTIONS_DEFAULT+=3D EXAMPLES > .endif >=20 > .include >=20 Why not simply that way: OPTIONS_DEFINE=3D ... DOCS EXAMPLES DOCS_DESC=3D Install the reference documents And done. Condtion an EXAMPLES on EXAMPLES options doesn't make sense to me. by default DOCS and EXAMPLES are on expect if the user set NOPORTDOCS, NOPORTEXAMPLES or OPTIONS_UNSET=3D DOCS EXAMPLES regards, Bapt --l8yJEXo8J9fv7OFY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/Vf4cACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyxRgCgm799XIMHh4HqeAT/8kMZ0t8D +GsAoLkN4GIVfj5vOSBa30sIXxTPluWa =K4e/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --l8yJEXo8J9fv7OFY-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 05:44:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1516C106566B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:44:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D684A8FC0A for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:44:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B11D23C04; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:44:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 908B6D23C03; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:44:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FD585AC.1050906@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:44:12 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "b. f." , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: port unmaintained since 2005? drop it? misc/gpt* X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:44:14 -0000 On 6/10/12 11:14 PM, b. f. wrote: > The distribution files are at: > > ftp://ftp.ncsa.uiuc.edu/aces/gpt/releases > > and the homepage is: > > http://grid.ncsa.illinois.edu/gpt/ > > (And Globus is at: > > http://www.globus.org/toolkit/ ) > > Time to determine this:< 1 min. > > b. glad to know you are volunteering to maintain these ports. I will resurrect globus from the archives (where it has been since 2008, see /usr/ports/MOVED), which email address do you want in the MAINTAINER= line? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 05:44:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26CC1065670 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:44:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: from z.umatar.com (z.umatar.com [66.135.39.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F7D8FC1F for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:44:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from z.umatar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5B5irZ6011973 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 22:44:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: (from uzimac@localhost) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q5B5ir80011972 for ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 22:44:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) X-Authentication-Warning: z.umatar.com: uzimac set sender to uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com using -f From: "Waitman Gobble" To: ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <1339393493.11967@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Originating-IP: 75.36.145.215 X-Mailer: Usermin 1.500 Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 22:44:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1339393493" Cc: Subject: libpng.so.6 missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:44:55 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1339393493 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I was reading the handbook about burning DVD's and thought I would check out K3b as recommended... so I attempted to install from ports. After an hour or so of the make script building a whole bunch of stuff my patience wore out, and I bailed. ports tree csup this morning. Now it seems many things that were working great will no longer load, it's missing libpng.so.6 # SciTE Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by "libpangocairo-1.0.so.0" # qtcreator Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by "libQtGui.so.4" # xxxterm Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by "libwebkitgtk-1.0.so.0" etc, etc. and so on. Anyhow, i am not sure which package 'libpng.so.6' comes from.. anyone have a tip or a pointer? these are installed.. # pkg_info | grep png gstreamer-plugins-libpng-0.10.30,3 Gstreamer png plugin png-1.5.10 Library for manipulating PNG images # uname -a FreeBSD hunny.waitman.net 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Jun 10 08:10:59 PDT 2012 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KEYSHIA amd64 Might be good to have a warning on the DVD page that attempting install of K3b can possibly dork up the entire system (?) Thank you, -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA --bound1339393493-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 05:45:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E891065672 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:45:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957768FC20 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:45:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA6E621C08; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:45:40 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 548AF621C0E; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:45:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FD58604.40806@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:45:40 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <4FD4FF32.1060402@FreeBSD.org> <4fd5acfa.idvDPcWpdoIIkuEZ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4fd5acfa.idvDPcWpdoIIkuEZ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port unmaintained since 2005? drop it? misc/gpt* X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:45:40 -0000 On 6/11/12 4:31 AM, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Dunno what (if anything) they are currently good for, but it seems > that, at a minimum, the PORTVERSION and/or MASTER_SITES -- and the > pkg-descr -- need to be updated. They still don't build. And, they still aren't need by anything in ports tree (again, globus was deleted from ports tree in 2008) anyone want to maintain them? I'll tag your name on the ports for you. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 05:49:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD77B106564A for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DBB08FC15 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:49:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5B5ngnE032426 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:49:43 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q5B5ngnE032426 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1339393783; bh=QQD8cNFuqrwpH9kFUqHAEMS2y9F06TzWcvUibPvV72g=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Cc:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:Message-ID: Mime-Version:References; b=0S8FKZlXCs1qbUN5JfPfDqvFUoam9tDFokN7mGOyhoERmLhEV/8Q5ugIOvLN+F9HP K3Ycne0xkNNtyh/GT8to1uL5utT5o8boW6vRWdBjK2bwTANjjefyT0oRwTjn4/ecrz rYBuEwOge4e/FcKajLhUTJPiKFpjP6mZKC/jN0dg= Message-ID: <4FD586EF.20100@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:49:35 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120601 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB9DFADEE73D7E90DF02164B3" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_ALL,DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Subject: OPTIONSng and OPTIONS_SINGLE, OPTIONS_MULTI X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:49:47 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB9DFADEE73D7E90DF02164B3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear all, In the new OPTIONS framework, we have some great new constructs for doing really useful stuff constraining what different combinations of options may be selected. One of these is OPTIONS_SINGLE which implements a 'radio button' permitting the choice of 1 item out of N options. Well, actually, it allows choosing 1 out of N in its generic form. Eg. OPTIONS_SINGLE=3D EXAMPLE OPTIONS_SINGLE_EXAMPLE=3D FOO BAR BAZ BLURFL (permits at exactly one out of FOO BAR BAZ BLURFL to be selected) Now, supposing the requirement is that 'at most one of those options' should be selected. Currently that is done like this: OPTIONS_DEFINE=3D EXAMPLE OPTIONS_SINGLE=3D EXAMPLE OPTIONS_SINGLE_EXAMPLE=3D FOO BAR BAZ BLURFL (requires at most one of FOO BAR BAZ BLURFL to be selected) I find this unsatisfactory, partly for aesthetic reasons and partly because it doesn't make much sense to me. Why should adding a normal on/off option with the same name as the SINGLE group mean you can choose either zero or one of these? It might work if the way options were presented to the user was more sophisticated than dialog(1), so you could grey-out the SINGLE options when the controlling DEFINE is turned off, but dialog doesn't do that. Surely it is more sensible to say that OPTIONS_SINGLE is strictly 'choose one from these options.' Then you can implement 'zero or one of these options' by: OPTIONS_SINGLE=3D EXAMPLE OPTIONS_SINGLE_EXAMPLE=3D FOO BAR BAZ BLURFL NONE_OF_THE_ABOVE Similar arguments apply to OPTIONS_MULTI. OPTIONS_MULTI=3D EXAMPLE2 OPTIONS_MULTI_EXAMPLE2=3D QUX QUUX QUUUX means 'choose at one or more out of QUX QUUX QUUUX' You can change that to mean 'choose any number out of QUX QUUX QUUUX' by: OPTIONS_DEFINE=3D EXAMPLE2 OPTIONS_MULTI=3D EXAMPLE2 OPTIONS_MULTI_EXAMPLE2=3D QUX QUUX QUUUX However, this is syntactically identical to just using normal on/off options with no constraints between them: OPTIONS_DEFINE=3D QUX QUUX QUUUX so that's just redundant. What do people think? Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigB9DFADEE73D7E90DF02164B3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/VhvYACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxzWACgjuXRJ/vDd7/pIJsi6eLc7ujK 6rcAn02sCV4qVkcml5Q0vpWxjONAb1eW =OUIW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB9DFADEE73D7E90DF02164B3-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 05:51:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86FA1106564A; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:51:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632838FC0A; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:51:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5B5phKN019470; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:51:43 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5B5ph61019447; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:51:43 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@freebsd.org using -f Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 07:51:40 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Vitaly Magerya Message-ID: <20120611055140.GR60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <201206041841.q54IfUow001060@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604191343.GF10783@isuckatdomains.isuckatdomains.net> <201206041932.q54JWONA001600@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FCDA15C.2000700@digsys.bg> <201206061859.q56IxvLx045828@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FCFC846.5050508@FreeBSD.org> <201206070527.q575R1sX052893@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FD37B40.2030500@FreeBSD.org> <20120609172649.GJ60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Ep5m4srWGXPl6O+g" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Dave Hayes , Doug Barton , FreeBSD ports list Subject: Re: Documenting 'make config' options X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:51:44 -0000 --Ep5m4srWGXPl6O+g Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 01:00:05PM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > There was a PR[1] to use some dialog(1) feature to expose it to > > the user, would be nice if that extended description could > > implemented that way (using help button from dialog(1)) I do not > > plan to work on this now if someone want to do it that will be > > great > > > > 1: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/123185 >=20 > I'm attaching a simple patch that allows you to hit F1 and view > pkg-options-descr file in the options dialog ("pkg-" prefix > should probably be removed, as that file has nothing to do with > packages). > --- bsd.port.mk.orig 2012-06-10 11:11:40.000000000 +0300 > +++ bsd.port.mk 2012-06-10 12:15:44.000000000 +0300 > @@ -2374,6 +2374,7 @@ > .endif > =20 > DESCR?=3D ${PKGDIR}/pkg-descr > +OPTIONS_DESCR?=3D ${PKGDIR}/pkg-options-descr > PLIST?=3D ${PKGDIR}/pkg-plist > PKGINSTALL?=3D ${PKGDIR}/pkg-install > PKGDEINSTALL?=3D ${PKGDIR}/pkg-deinstall > @@ -6068,8 +6069,15 @@ > (${ECHO_MSG} "=3D=3D=3D> Cannot create $${optionsdir}, check permission= s"; exit 1) > .endif > @TMPOPTIONSFILE=3D$$(mktemp -t portoptions); \ > + if [ -e "${OPTIONS_DESCR}" ]; then \ > + helpopt=3D"--hfile ${OPTIONS_DESCR}"; \ > + helptitle=3D" (F1 for details)"; \ > + else \ > + helpopt=3D""; \ > + helptitle=3D""; \ > + fi; \ > trap "${RM} -f $${TMPOPTIONSFILE}; exit 1" 1 2 3 5 10 13 15; \ > - ${DIALOG} --checklist "Options for ${PKGNAME:C/-([^-]+)$/ \1/}" 21 70 1= 5 ${DEFOPTIONS} 2> $${TMPOPTIONSFILE} || { \ > + ${DIALOG} $${helpopt} --checklist "Options for ${PKGNAME:C/-([^-]+)$/ \= 1/}$${helptitle}" 21 70 15 ${DEFOPTIONS} 2> $${TMPOPTIONSFILE} || { \ > ${RM} -f $${TMPOPTIONSFILE}; \ > ${ECHO_MSG} "=3D=3D=3D> Options unchanged"; \ > exit 0; \ Besides I might change some naming here, (not much) this looks a really cle= ver way of bringing the features much more clever than what I could have been thinking of. Thank you very much, I do some testing on it soon. what I like is having a complete text to describe options, and not being li= mited to per option description. On the change I'll just change OPTIONS_DESCR to OPTIONS_HELP and pkg-options-descr to options-help Thank you very much for the patch! regards, Bapt --Ep5m4srWGXPl6O+g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/Vh2wACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzMXACgr7PpQ4WuqDaeVp9VOO51RyIb TBUAoKaYQDw2irdHXgjR+Z8AFNxOZAGM =Lmxk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Ep5m4srWGXPl6O+g-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 05:52:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5778B1065673 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:52:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282148FC0C for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:52:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE12CD23C04 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:52:41 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3E9BD23C03 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:52:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FD587A9.7010809@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 01:52:41 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <1339393493.11967@da3m0n8t3r.com> In-Reply-To: <1339393493.11967@da3m0n8t3r.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: libpng.so.6 missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:52:42 -0000 On 6/11/12 1:44 AM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > Hi, > > I was reading the handbook about burning DVD's and thought I would check out K3b as recommended... so I attempted to install from ports. After an hour or so of the make script building a whole bunch of stuff my patience wore out, and I bailed. > > ports tree csup this morning. > > Now it seems many things that were working great will no longer load, it's missing libpng.so.6 > > # SciTE > Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by "libpangocairo-1.0.so.0" > > # qtcreator > Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by "libQtGui.so.4" > > # xxxterm > Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by "libwebkitgtk-1.0.so.0" > > > etc, etc. and so on. > > Anyhow, i am not sure which package 'libpng.so.6' comes from.. anyone have a tip or a pointer? > something is still looking for an old version of png (libpng.so.6), the new version of png uses lib: libpng.so.15. Did you rebuild all packages from source? quick 'cheat' would be to restore libpng.so.6 to compat library from your backup, or another system. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 05:54:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E6A106566B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:54:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A4F8FC16; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5B5sVmt020319; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:54:31 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5B5sVgG020318; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:54:31 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 07:54:29 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20120611055428.GS60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <4FD586EF.20100@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s9pXJW6w71JX4l3T" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FD586EF.20100@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: OPTIONSng and OPTIONS_SINGLE, OPTIONS_MULTI X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:54:32 -0000 --s9pXJW6w71JX4l3T Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 06:49:35AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: >=20 > Dear all, >=20 > In the new OPTIONS framework, we have some great new constructs for > doing really useful stuff constraining what different combinations of > options may be selected. >=20 > One of these is OPTIONS_SINGLE which implements a 'radio button' > permitting the choice of 1 item out of N options. Well, actually, it > allows choosing 1 out of N in its generic form. Eg. >=20 > OPTIONS_SINGLE=3D EXAMPLE > OPTIONS_SINGLE_EXAMPLE=3D FOO BAR BAZ BLURFL >=20 > (permits at exactly one out of FOO BAR BAZ BLURFL to be selected) >=20 > Now, supposing the requirement is that 'at most one of those options' > should be selected. Currently that is done like this: >=20 > OPTIONS_DEFINE=3D EXAMPLE > OPTIONS_SINGLE=3D EXAMPLE > OPTIONS_SINGLE_EXAMPLE=3D FOO BAR BAZ BLURFL >=20 > (requires at most one of FOO BAR BAZ BLURFL to be selected) >=20 > I find this unsatisfactory, partly for aesthetic reasons and partly > because it doesn't make much sense to me. Why should adding a normal > on/off option with the same name as the SINGLE group mean you can choose > either zero or one of these? It might work if the way options were > presented to the user was more sophisticated than dialog(1), so you > could grey-out the SINGLE options when the controlling DEFINE is turned > off, but dialog doesn't do that. >=20 > Surely it is more sensible to say that OPTIONS_SINGLE is strictly > 'choose one from these options.' Then you can implement 'zero or one of > these options' by: >=20 > OPTIONS_SINGLE=3D EXAMPLE > OPTIONS_SINGLE_EXAMPLE=3D FOO BAR BAZ BLURFL NONE_OF_THE_ABOVE >=20 > Similar arguments apply to OPTIONS_MULTI. >=20 > OPTIONS_MULTI=3D EXAMPLE2 > OPTIONS_MULTI_EXAMPLE2=3D QUX QUUX QUUUX >=20 > means 'choose at one or more out of QUX QUUX QUUUX' You can change that > to mean 'choose any number out of QUX QUUX QUUUX' by: >=20 > OPTIONS_DEFINE=3D EXAMPLE2 > OPTIONS_MULTI=3D EXAMPLE2 > OPTIONS_MULTI_EXAMPLE2=3D QUX QUUX QUUUX >=20 > However, this is syntactically identical to just using normal on/off > options with no constraints between them: >=20 > OPTIONS_DEFINE=3D QUX QUUX QUUUX >=20 > so that's just redundant. >=20 > What do people think? >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Matthew >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW >=20 >=20 I 100% agree on that, it should be quite easy to do just needs 2 new names = :) And a patch we shouldn't be complicated (while writting the patch be careful than some ports are already using SINGLE the aesthetic way and need to be patched at the same time. regards, Bapt --s9pXJW6w71JX4l3T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/ViBQACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExCnQCgv9SspcXZQopSYIzexXehNbCG GqQAn3uQ8/mcggs6/ZLZw6hYdjHpyNe4 =JJWp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s9pXJW6w71JX4l3T-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 06:10:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D59106566B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:10:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: from z.umatar.com (z.umatar.com [66.135.39.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44D38FC17 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:10:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from z.umatar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5B6ALpU013800 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:10:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: (from uzimac@localhost) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q5B6ALc2013799 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:10:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) X-Authentication-Warning: z.umatar.com: uzimac set sender to uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com using -f From: "Waitman Gobble" To: Message-Id: <1339395021.13449@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Originating-IP: 75.36.145.215 X-Mailer: Usermin 1.500 In-Reply-To: <4FD587A9.7010809@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:10:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1339395021" Subject: Re: libpng.so.6 missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:10:21 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1339395021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Michael Scheidell wrote .. > > > On 6/11/12 1:44 AM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I was reading the handbook about burning DVD's and thought I would check out > K3b as recommended... so I attempted to install from ports. After an hour or so > of the make script building a whole bunch of stuff my patience wore out, and I > bailed. > > > > ports tree csup this morning. > > > > Now it seems many things that were working great will no longer load, it's missing > libpng.so.6 > > > > # SciTE > > Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by "libpangocairo-1.0.so.0" > > > > # qtcreator > > Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by "libQtGui.so.4" > > > > # xxxterm > > Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by "libwebkitgtk-1.0.so.0" > > > > > > etc, etc. and so on. > > > > Anyhow, i am not sure which package 'libpng.so.6' comes from.. anyone have a > tip or a pointer? > > > something is still looking for an old version of png (libpng.so.6), the > new version of png uses lib: libpng.so.15. > Did you rebuild all packages from source? > quick 'cheat' would be to restore libpng.so.6 to compat library from > your backup, or another system. > > > -- > Michael Scheidell, CTO > >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation > d: +1.561.948.2259 > w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Thank you for your reply. I did not rebuild all ports from source. This system was previously on a low power machine and I used pre-compiled packages as much as possible, because of the system requirements to build from source. I'll pull the libpng.so.6 and see if that fixes it. -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA --bound1339395021-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 06:12:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A515106566C; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:12:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B38C8FC0C; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:12:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so2793868wgb.31 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:12:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UbfOvp9sd1jlTPufy6sePpRtCR9xXrdYw2skODvZSf0=; b=peTbd3ujwWqZCMC+9Dz59Q4x4I2A2lvEyKs24kwkmLKRiqQZQ3+j68meVYL5m5bta5 uG5D6htRNmdQg6WpnOISY4op4Eg3mFO8W7DFl5K/nKPoO/XafxDeylunYY14pIeQQohD ZxugZdUKceZ4O3XbTMBvwK8B7ot5xka1yZsKJ7WKYPcfIRw1fVTzoKq0dreuzwrpo/Ii Xed6FA3uL6an3uhVGURwtMFAk+Rf/i+ZBK9acs/vYPSJIPO8QnBcolV8RLAJS+Z7AIGU fomA+FIrSE+ySWqEc52qZ/hxKtT2e3yFUQvyyrRtfca8FSpg+RIChgtsrAAIeuadpr+c p5fg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.14.193 with SMTP id r1mr17973163wic.13.1339395129647; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:12:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.155.4 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:12:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FD587A9.7010809@FreeBSD.org> References: <1339393493.11967@da3m0n8t3r.com> <4FD587A9.7010809@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:12:09 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: Michael Scheidell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpng.so.6 missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:12:11 -0000 On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > > > On 6/11/12 1:44 AM, Waitman Gobble wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I was reading the handbook about burning DVD's and thought I would check >> out K3b as recommended... so I attempted to install from ports. After an >> hour or so of the make script building a whole bunch of stuff my patienc= e >> wore out, and I bailed. >> >> ports tree csup this morning. >> >> Now it seems many things that were working great will no longer load, it= 's >> missing libpng.so.6 >> >> # SciTE >> Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by >> "libpangocairo-1.0.so.0" >> >> # qtcreator >> Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by "libQtGui.so.4" >> >> # xxxterm >> Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by "libwebkitgtk-1.0.so.= 0" >> >> >> etc, etc. and so on. >> >> Anyhow, i am not sure which package 'libpng.so.6' comes from.. anyone ha= ve >> a tip or a pointer? >> > something is still looking for an old version of png (libpng.so.6), =A0th= e new > version of png uses lib: libpng.so.15. > Did you rebuild all packages from source? > quick 'cheat' would be to =A0restore libpng.so.6 to compat library from y= our > backup, or another system. > Install sysutils/bsdadminscripts and 'pkg_chklib -o | grep libpng | sort'. This will provide a list of ports that need to be re-installed so that they will be linked to the new libpng. As pkg_chklib reports on every file that references the old libpng, you may see ports listed several times, once for every executable or shareable that references libpng.so.6. This will really fix the problem. Pulling in a copy of libpng.so.6 might make things work, but may fail if more than one version of libpng is linked to different shareables or executables. --=20 R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 06:12:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0461C1065672 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:12:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98868FC08 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:12:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8104B621C4D for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 02:12:24 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F11FA621C53 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 02:12:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FD58C48.6050506@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 02:12:24 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <1339395021.13449@da3m0n8t3r.com> In-Reply-To: <1339395021.13449@da3m0n8t3r.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: libpng.so.6 missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:12:25 -0000 On 6/11/12 2:10 AM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > I did not rebuild all ports from source. This system was previously on a low power machine and I used pre-compiled packages as much as possible, looks like one (or more) of the packages still references libpng.so.6. if using portmaster, next time, use -w (preserves old libraries) -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 06:24:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22FFE1065677 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:24:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B7B8FC16 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:24:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so8070903obc.13 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:24:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=B6VMPJuwJ8X0XG/86j+TZeqmqYGBn0i7jYTUHMSq98w=; b=Ty4e9xZOsyHpjHmUrV4oiHtaC4WgQzrek44W4ecT57xyqjZ9y4Iwg5uJBehUV4N2HF VT0jk9ia7HD3uy70Q+VKeMPRstTmdeb6YfXOQD5fXeD92W6+sctwznzPYopdSifF6ti6 DeCewjEXVevzaGYOKQFDh8H6dMLp1h+GybAkU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=B6VMPJuwJ8X0XG/86j+TZeqmqYGBn0i7jYTUHMSq98w=; b=boHB4JfOoyTKPRUKCH3fjabsQ6gDrEJcXm+v87hTtE9COx34CjOmv79rAaeUGPBdmu gXZimrzuRCPcYkA+Yvxqg+l5m0t0kJDc1X20CaBSSHVruaHlXRsyX5SplafKdZ33byxp jgPwiMnNTafJGq4GynSTKTmN5Z7ZntjgYLaGwc+dvIAMqYNZsmE1K5ILTIFRyIw45SvN Ox2rIxxmtGnS0jvgw4u3atVkJrebJyR9q2/SzSonZwRqYhPbaNWYKj60AWefaLjxzLVe 2Gb7DxG0mfwMn49Dd0YotLbsFwIBJ79/LhWYozXDMnsHjtkJeFKOkjqly7ghT2tOl/NU wQ3Q== Received: by 10.60.25.103 with SMTP id b7mr14970010oeg.44.1339395856484; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:24:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.204.69 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:23:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> From: Eitan Adler Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:23:46 -0700 Message-ID: To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlYIIWJmatphkMsLq9uJIYgP6jb7MjdSFCiAAXG5ww5SNML6hit2ZuSJXU6T6KsLYvR1/Ch Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:24:17 -0000 On 10 June 2012 21:30, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi all, > > In the ports tree we lack a unique identifier, while we could live without it > until now, it is more than needed for 2 upcoming features: pkgng and stage > directory support. > > unique means something that will always be the same what ever the options are > and what ever the runtime they use are. But also means unique in term of in the > whole ports no other package will share its identifier. > > currently the only equivalent of this in the ports tree is the origin of a > package, which will no more be unique with the upcoming sub package support > (coming along with stage directory) aka 1 origin to produce n package. Perhaps we could introduce UNIQUE_ORIGIN which is ${ORIGIN}_${SUBPACKAGE} or something of the sort? -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 06:33:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9EF106566B; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:33:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2DE8FC0A; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werg1 with SMTP id g1so2289318wer.13 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:33:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OU5h3snPTVBx3EhsSOtulU+RWMQ1pJvWTrDXlp3BKW8=; b=V/iGPGiGmSCg4w5/gEujyi1chf+yz/raHioHwpSufe0eCu2/kukqwxLET/8ZYTzaPr SL3U6CgKDk7DikOMOS3upzofAFCx0/j7ga+uexItzhHevkYO9iMZysNLZkkNWIQ9PpUa 4FQY4W7TG+uIk+TtcsTAQ0tIikI2om1p8Y88bZygPae429GsD0fshxrl6X3Bbrgp9Obm rpfDT5RcMJJ2MEWxtRTPFXKiEFohSA5E0CWErIEatigil4c+oPph/UFtZ3I8btcp3a4D HbwHrVHFiGIEZxX7G1vBJKr/XhPxwQvm/I/43QtnznLmZ/gTkmAYttOxIhiyfovKprBi wLDw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.214.82 with SMTP id b60mr5810398wep.38.1339396429101; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:33:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.102.4 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:33:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FD585AC.1050906@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FD585AC.1050906@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 02:33:49 -0400 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: Michael Scheidell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port unmaintained since 2005? drop it? misc/gpt* X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:33:53 -0000 On 6/11/12, Michael Scheidell wrote: > > > On 6/10/12 11:14 PM, b. f. wrote: >> The distribution files are at: >> >> ftp://ftp.ncsa.uiuc.edu/aces/gpt/releases >> >> and the homepage is: >> >> http://grid.ncsa.illinois.edu/gpt/ >> >> (And Globus is at: >> >> http://www.globus.org/toolkit/ ) >> >> Time to determine this:< 1 min. >> >> b. > glad to know you are volunteering to maintain these ports. > I will resurrect globus from the archives (where it has been since 2008, > see /usr/ports/MOVED), > which email address do you want in the MAINTAINER= line? > Heh, not so fast. I've got other things to do first. I was just pointing out that it is not so hard to correct some of the stale information, and it is useful to do this as a pointer to those who may wish to more actively maintain the port later, even if it is moved to the attic in a few months. I should add that globus comes with a bundled version of gpt, and I think the Debian port is based upon this -- it's at 3.6.x. Also, that brooks@, who was involved in adding this port and other related software, could probably tell you more about grid software. b. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 06:36:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA10F106564A; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:36:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198088FC12; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:36:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5B6aLJx033290 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 07:36:21 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q5B6aLJx033290 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1339396581; bh=Qcf7PYVCm6N4Geh6bKXCgmflyTys6hhJ5+kLtnDe2Ew=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Message-ID:Mime-Version; b=ckPdd8dajv1xVPX5QlupbHoMEnqdJUYB35eOrgXV+22MAR1aysdKAzoHMQP2/2vPP uxCQn9iuJhTKg6PIw5gFDjo99xO03FQsU8SfvQD3ciqXsFWmDu31+W++BAHCZf/FES RwHdJJpHc+dXuScq2iSacV6z/KwY4mntbFSxR5gQ= Message-ID: <4FD591DF.3060808@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 07:36:15 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120601 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDF15EC2F119C4E73A739BA2A" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_ALL,DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:36:25 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDF15EC2F119C4E73A739BA2A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/06/2012 05:30, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > In the ports tree we lack a unique identifier, while we could live with= out it > until now, it is more than needed for 2 upcoming features: pkgng and st= age > directory support. >=20 > unique means something that will always be the same what ever the optio= ns are > and what ever the runtime they use are. But also means unique in term o= f in the > whole ports no other package will share its identifier. >=20 > currently the only equivalent of this in the ports tree is the origin o= f a > package, which will no more be unique with the upcoming sub package sup= port > (coming along with stage directory) aka 1 origin to produce n package. >=20 > UNIQUENAME and LATEST_LINK fails in that area because they both can cha= nge > according to the runtime: py27- for example which will become py30- if = you > change the default python. > LATEST_LINK by default also append the PKGNAMEPREFIX which some ports c= an be > really creative with. >=20 > should we introduce something new, should we fix one of the above? do y= ou have > any suggestion? I was looking at this. You'ld think from the name that UNIQUENAME is the appropriate variable here. Yet by my calculations there are 1439 ports using non-unique UNIQUENAME variables. Fixing that seems like common sense to me: why call it unique if it isn't? UNIQUENAME importance being because the default location for a port's OPTIONSFILE is derived from it, and non-uniqueness can lead to ports fighting over control of that file? Which is bad when unintentional, but can be useful for some related ports to share the same options settin= gs. Does pkgng really need LATEST_LINK at all? As far as I recall, that only exists so that the user can say: # pkg_add -r firefox without having to look up the version number of the firefox port. But pkg(1) pretty much already lets you do that, maybe with the aid of '-x' or '-X' options. Come the pkgng revolution, LATEST_LINK should be one of the first against the wall. I don't see the problem with port prefixes changing UNIQUENAME. Isn't py27-foo conceptually a different port to py30-foo ? Yes, they are built from the same port ORIGIN, but you already intend dropping the one-to-one correspondence between port ORIGINS and packages with the introduction of sub-ports. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigDF15EC2F119C4E73A739BA2A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/VkeUACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwILgCfVH4X/I10IMvmTmNQVXjW18cP 2lgAoIqsqEf4oEJ0ZtMNA6qHDYkj3r9M =Xf6T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDF15EC2F119C4E73A739BA2A-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 06:40:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A5C106566C; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:40:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: from z.umatar.com (z.umatar.com [66.135.39.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133288FC12; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:40:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from z.umatar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5B6ehIY082626; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:40:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: (from uzimac@localhost) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q5B6eh6k082625; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:40:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) X-Authentication-Warning: z.umatar.com: uzimac set sender to uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com using -f From: "Waitman Gobble" To: Kevin Oberman Message-Id: <1339396843.15431@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Originating-IP: 75.36.145.215 X-Mailer: Usermin 1.500 In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:40:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1339396843" Cc: Michael Scheidell , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpng.so.6 missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 06:40:44 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1339396843 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kevin Oberman wrote .. > On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Michael Scheidell > wrote: > > > > > > On 6/11/12 1:44 AM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I was reading the handbook about burning DVD's and thought I would check > >> out K3b as recommended... so I attempted to install from ports. After an > >> hour or so of the make script building a whole bunch of stuff my patience > >> wore out, and I bailed. > >> > >> ports tree csup this morning. > >> > >> Now it seems many things that were working great will no longer load, it's > >> missing libpng.so.6 > >> > >> # SciTE > >> Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by > >> "libpangocairo-1.0.so.0" > >> > >> # qtcreator > >> Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by "libQtGui.so.4" > >> > >> # xxxterm > >> Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by "libwebkitgtk-1.0.so.0" > >> > >> > >> etc, etc. and so on. > >> > >> Anyhow, i am not sure which package 'libpng.so.6' comes from.. anyone have > >> a tip or a pointer? > >> > > something is still looking for an old version of png (libpng.so.6), =A0the new > > version of png uses lib: libpng.so.15. > > Did you rebuild all packages from source? > > quick 'cheat' would be to =A0restore libpng.so.6 to compat library from your > > backup, or another system. > > > > Install sysutils/bsdadminscripts and 'pkg_chklib -o | grep libpng | > sort'. This will provide a list of ports that need to be re-installed > so that they will be linked to the new libpng. As pkg_chklib reports > on every file that references the old libpng, you may see ports listed > several times, once for every executable or shareable that references > libpng.so.6. > > This will really fix the problem. Pulling in a copy of libpng.so.6 > might make things work, but may fail if more than one version of > libpng is linked to different shareables or executables. > -- > R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer > E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Thank you, I appreciate the information. I will add 'replace-packages' in my package-update script. -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA --bound1339396843-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 07:30:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9301065672 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 07:30:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF848FC21; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 07:30:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5B7ULm8015078; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 07:30:21 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5B7ULJn015069; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 07:30:21 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@freebsd.org using -f Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:30:18 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Eitan Adler Message-ID: <20120611073017.GT60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k8r0khnpBuGu0wUi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 07:30:21 -0000 --k8r0khnpBuGu0wUi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:23:46PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 10 June 2012 21:30, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > In the ports tree we lack a unique identifier, while we could live with= out it > > until now, it is more than needed for 2 upcoming features: pkgng and st= age > > directory support. > > > > unique means something that will always be the same what ever the optio= ns are > > and what ever the runtime they use are. But also means unique in term o= f in the > > whole ports no other package will share its identifier. > > > > currently the only equivalent of this in the ports tree is the origin o= f a > > package, which will no more be unique with the upcoming sub package sup= port > > (coming along with stage directory) aka 1 origin to produce n package. >=20 > Perhaps we could introduce UNIQUE_ORIGIN which is > ${ORIGIN}_${SUBPACKAGE} or something of the sort? >=20 I thought about this one, but while here we should think about package move which keeps being the same package, in that case origin will change, and the uniquename will change which is no good for binary world. regards, Bapt --k8r0khnpBuGu0wUi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/VnokACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ew3owCfRo2vGcpYrh1KhJg6Ax6ApC4F mGEAoJ4AnYm50SqlyntKdBS9so3c8C+A =clVK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k8r0khnpBuGu0wUi-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 10:32:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B599106564A for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:32:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6848FC15; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:32:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BAWPXM002948; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:32:25 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5BAWO3G002915; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:32:24 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@freebsd.org using -f Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:32:22 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20120611103221.GU60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD591DF.3060808@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ULJ2Z7kCM1hyNsWd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FD591DF.3060808@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:32:25 -0000 --ULJ2Z7kCM1hyNsWd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 07:36:15AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 11/06/2012 05:30, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > In the ports tree we lack a unique identifier, while we could live with= out it > > until now, it is more than needed for 2 upcoming features: pkgng and st= age > > directory support. > >=20 > > unique means something that will always be the same what ever the optio= ns are > > and what ever the runtime they use are. But also means unique in term o= f in the > > whole ports no other package will share its identifier. > >=20 > > currently the only equivalent of this in the ports tree is the origin o= f a > > package, which will no more be unique with the upcoming sub package sup= port > > (coming along with stage directory) aka 1 origin to produce n package. > >=20 > > UNIQUENAME and LATEST_LINK fails in that area because they both can cha= nge > > according to the runtime: py27- for example which will become py30- if = you > > change the default python. > > LATEST_LINK by default also append the PKGNAMEPREFIX which some ports c= an be > > really creative with. > >=20 > > should we introduce something new, should we fix one of the above? do y= ou have > > any suggestion? >=20 > I was looking at this. You'ld think from the name that UNIQUENAME is > the appropriate variable here. Yet by my calculations there are 1439 > ports using non-unique UNIQUENAME variables. Fixing that seems like > common sense to me: why call it unique if it isn't? >=20 > UNIQUENAME importance being because the default location for a port's > OPTIONSFILE is derived from it, and non-uniqueness can lead to ports > fighting over control of that file? Which is bad when unintentional, > but can be useful for some related ports to share the same options settin= gs. Well this is the right thing to do but looking at bsd.port.mk and the chang= es needed I get bored and gave up :( >=20 > Does pkgng really need LATEST_LINK at all? As far as I recall, that > only exists so that the user can say: Well no pkgng doesn't need it at all except for pkg itself for the bootstra= p :) >=20 > # pkg_add -r firefox >=20 > without having to look up the version number of the firefox port. But > pkg(1) pretty much already lets you do that, maybe with the aid of '-x' > or '-X' options. Come the pkgng revolution, LATEST_LINK should be one > of the first against the wall. >=20 > I don't see the problem with port prefixes changing UNIQUENAME. Isn't > py27-foo conceptually a different port to py30-foo ? Yes, they are > built from the same port ORIGIN, but you already intend dropping the > one-to-one correspondence between port ORIGINS and packages with the > introduction of sub-ports. Maybe they are different packages, but they have the same options, and from pkgng we should be able to detect it as the same package just a different runtime which is what they are. >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Matthew >=20 > --=20 > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW >=20 >=20 >=20 --ULJ2Z7kCM1hyNsWd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/VyTUACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzhQACfSQ2W9MVYgZ1qzzIgA69i23u5 5eIAnidG4cHg4VaonkRtG7/uMtEIm4NP =YJ1+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ULJ2Z7kCM1hyNsWd-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 11:06:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49085106566C for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:06:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A8A8FC14 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BB698Q052433 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:06:09 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5BB68se052430 for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:06:08 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:06:08 GMT Message-Id: <201206111106.q5BB68se052430@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: FreeBSD ports list Cc: Subject: Current unassigned ports problem reports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:06:09 -0000 (Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o ports/168946 [PATCH] lang/php5-extensions Avoid optionsNG breakage o ports/168945 [patch update take-maint] update devel/soapui 3.5 -> 4 o ports/168943 [patch] [maintainer] unbreak port databases/libudbc o ports/168941 [ERROR] cannot upgrade graphics/ImageMagick to version o ports/168940 [ERROR] cannot upgrade misc/ossp-uuid to version 1.6.2 o ports/168937 [MAINTAINER] emulators/dynagen: fix RUN_DEPENDS o ports/168936 [bsd.pkgng.mk / bsd.options.mk] Fix portmgr options (D f ports/168935 www/firefox-remote shares PORTNAME with www/firefox o ports/168934 update textproc/dikt to 2j o ports/168933 update net/gnu-dico to 2.2 o ports/168932 [NEW PORT] net-mgmt/phpipam: PHPIPAM: PHP IP Address M o ports/168926 Second '59.xxx' out of range 0..59 at security/snort-r o ports/168914 [maintainer update] math/ess 12.04-02 -> 12.04-04 + CO o ports/168906 Update port mail/assp to 1.9.3.6 and update new to new o ports/168905 [NEW PORT] devel/rebar: A build-tool for Erlang that f f ports/168892 [PATCH] benchmarks/polygraph: Update to 4.3.2 - Unmark o ports/168861 devel/tkcvs: tkdiff no longer runs correctly f ports/168841 x11/slim fails to authorize (through kereros) if built o ports/168832 New port: sysutils/bsdinfo a freebsd version of 'arche f ports/168824 [PATCH] astro/gpstk: fix conflict & lib links o ports/168809 [new port] net-im/spectrum: Jabber/XMPP transport/gate f ports/168661 devel/boost-libs fails on make package because of miss f ports/168648 [PATCH] editors/mg: Don't hard code CC in Makefile o ports/168627 [NEW PORT] net/bibtexconv port f ports/168611 conflict: cad/brlcad: Port shares files with other por o ports/168576 [MAINTAINER] sysutils/watchmen: update to 0.07 f ports/168559 Updated lang/clojure to version 1.4.0 f ports/168523 [PATCH] sysutils/smartmontools smartd can't see ada(4) o ports/168515 New port: devel/elasticsearch A search engine in Java o ports/168486 [PATCH] www/sams, warnings "strftime() [function.strft f ports/168484 [patch] update www/cntlm to version 0.92.2 o ports/168483 Maintainer Update: lang/squeak version up to 4.4.7-238 o ports/168466 [PATCH] www/sams, web-interface, needs GetHostnameSam. o ports/168452 New Port: comms/qtel EchoLink Client and SvrLink audio f ports/168444 Segfault in devel/gdb version 7.4.1 f ports/168407 [patch] lang/gauche: update to 0.9.3.2, unbreak o ports/168404 [NEW PORT] databases/dev-sqlite3: This is a developmen o ports/168385 every port has vulnerabilities in case of locale probl o ports/168366 port www/lynx Move lynx conf files form ${LOCALBASE}/e o ports/168334 New port: security/kpcli - Command line interface to K o ports/168321 fix japanese/kon2-16dot f ports/168319 graphics/qiviewer: Not displaying image jpeg o ports/168191 sysutils/ezjail + freebsd9 -stable --> dont work o ports/168177 [NEW PORT] games/asteroids3d: First-person shooter blo f ports/168161 [PATCH] sysutils/conky: update to 1.9.0 f ports/168160 ports-mgmt/jailaudit doesn't return a non-0 exit code o ports/168141 faild to install lang/ezm3 f ports/168139 install net/quagga is failed s ports/167955 [update] graphics/tinyows: Fix dependency to postgis f ports/167950 databases/memcachedb does not work on 10-CURRENT o ports/167943 [PATCH] fix warnings when compiling benchmarks/iozone f ports/167910 [MAINTAINER] databases/mariadb-scripts: add missing de f ports/167824 mail/dovecot: double checks for build options f ports/167691 security/heimdal: problem compiling kerberos/heimdal o ports/167591 security/openssh-portable looks for ecdsa key but none o ports/167554 security/openssh-portable has some drawbacks f ports/167090 sysutils/ezjail: Invalid command line option in ezjail o ports/167042 New port: net-p2p/tahoe-lafs f ports/167031 security/heimdal ignore environment after process call f ports/166987 net/nss_ldap: ports/152982 causes nss_ldap to not func o ports/166826 New port: misc/libphidget The driver for Phidgets devi o ports/166812 New port: mail/bounceHammer o ports/166728 New port: science/fvcom-mpi o ports/166726 New port: science/fvcom o ports/166665 [new port] java/jboss-as: JBoss 7.1 new port o ports/166522 lang/f77: Fortran 77 compiler always exits with error f ports/166388 security/libgcrypt is broken s ports/166244 [maintainer update] databases/powerarchitect version u o ports/166243 New port databases/jdbc-oracle10g: JDBD driver for Ora o ports/166237 New port: devel/arduino-glcd: A Graphical LCD library o ports/166117 add knobs in math/grace to make features selectable an o ports/166006 Problem with mail/postfix and mail/mailman integration f ports/166004 www/squid31 3.1.19 crashes on first request f ports/165672 sysutils/bacula-server doesn't install all symlinks ne o ports/165586 New port german/lx-office-erp, sql-ledger fork with ex f ports/165361 x11-wm/e17-module-mem counts memory incorrectly o ports/165294 accessibility/redshift on freebsd 9 - intel icore I5 i f ports/164941 [UPDATE] [NEW PORTS] jamvm/classpath w/o jdk o ports/164818 sysutils/tty-clock may be fixed on 9.0 o ports/164563 games/sumwars can't run o ports/164306 update mail/mailagent to 3.1.77 and utmpx fix o ports/164277 new port: mail/roundcube-automatic_addressbook o ports/164199 Ports fail to acknowlegde newly created users o ports/164177 audio/squeezeboxserver should require mysql 5.0 server o ports/164060 net/ucarp doesn't work on FreeBSD 9.0-PRERELEASE o ports/164055 sysutils/zfs-periodic: Test if scrubbing is in process o ports/163955 input packet for interface are counted twice a ports/163872 devel/ioncube and distfiles o ports/163850 New port: cad/linux-bricscad o ports/163806 New port: devel/arduino-lib-irremote: A Multi-Protocol o ports/163583 [patch] x11/kdelibs3 conflicts with openssl-1 o ports/163441 databases/couchdb multiple port installation issues. f ports/163126 security/sshguard changed from syslog.conf to daemon b o bin/162681 pkg_add(1): new installer does not add doc packages o ports/162511 [NEW PORT] net-im/imspector-devel devel version of ims o ports/162221 9.0-RC1 new problem building lang/spidermonkey o ports/162045 print/ghostview 1.5_2 coredumps on certain files o ports/161981 [maintainer update] sysutils/samesame to v1.10 f ports/161690 New port: games/prboom-plus Port of ID Software's Doom o ports/161578 devel/strace is not working f ports/161070 infinite loop for graphics/xfig on 9.0-CURRENT f ports/160993 New port: security/sqlcipher f ports/159177 sysutils/muse on 8.2-STABLE f ports/159121 net/freevrrpd: Make adv_int a runtime configurable opt o ports/159003 devel/cross-gcc attempts to use $PRFIX/../../ranlib on o ports/158983 [NEW PORT] devel/pecl-dtrace: PHP DTrace provider f ports/158704 New port: mail/mailfromd o ports/157320 [NEW PORT] databases/pecl-pdo_user: PECL classes provi o ports/157301 [New port] net-mgmt/zbxlog: Syslog server receives mes o ports/157107 conflict between mail/p5-Mail-SPF and mail/libspf2 o ports/156834 New port: games/fairymax-devel latest version of games o ports/155941 net/nepenthes: mwserv library support is not included f ports/155898 Update port devel/libthai f ports/155115 devel/doxygen: dependancy loop o ports/155070 NEW PORT: games/CastleVox - new fast strategy board ga o ports/154711 security/heimdal: kadmin: hdb_open: hdb_open failed in o ports/154682 net/iaxmodem: add rc script for running more than 1 ia o ports/153386 devel/valgrind does not build/include man pages o ports/152915 russian/xmms v. 1.2.11_12 don't see cdinfo and tag's i o ports/152899 devel/valgrind: unhandled syscall: 506 o ports/152118 New port: deskutils/linux-tahometer A worktime trackin o ports/151747 new port: emulators/wine-fbsd64: request for (a variat o ports/151662 ports-mgmt/portupgrade: upgrade of autoconf leaves old o ports/151280 emulators/vmware-guestd6 port install error in /usr/po o ports/150425 www/squid31: rc.d/squid's squid_fib setting ineffectiv s ports/149817 [wishlist] ports-mgmt/portupgrade: portinstall -p opti o ports/140008 ports-mgmt/portupgrade: many papercut omissions on por o ports/129930 ports-mgmt/portupgrade - portinstall tries to install o ports/127889 ports-mgmt/portupgrade detects spurious failures and s f ports/57498 HEIMDAL_HOME should be defined in src or ports Makefil 130 problems total. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 11:08:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52133106564A for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:08:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230798FC23 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BB8xuf054598 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:08:59 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5BB8wUS054595 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:08:58 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:08:58 GMT Message-Id: <201206111108.q5BB8wUS054595@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:08:59 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o ports/168328 ports [REPOCOPY] devel/codeblocks --> devel/codeblocks-devel 1 problem total. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 11:34:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB636106564A; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:34:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F978FC26; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:34:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BBYSJo078483 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:34:29 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q5BBYSJo078483 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1339414469; bh=X/VyJJoEGmoGowHm7jS/KAWvAE9H1NjyQJ8fMAqV78Y=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Message-ID:Mime-Version; b=zNaoiDnFSyWOH4cgBuwrbQdzl83Y2/vtxrFvjvTLmdmOnXReZIRfaZCCLpD7SdoSH 8rShdhtB50Ey1i/HPFvzE2aP8+ubbr2tJocCg/li7m/0WOzOQk9tc+mSLp03pGCdRM LhTwnofu50XqeoUIQYI4DTdsrs/UMnjb7u2cb6uQ= Message-ID: <4FD5D7B8.9080504@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:34:16 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120601 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD591DF.3060808@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611103221.GU60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20120611103221.GU60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7DAD64CC3C9D3B7795A1D430" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_ALL,DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:34:33 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7DAD64CC3C9D3B7795A1D430 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/06/2012 11:32, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> UNIQUENAME importance being because the default location for a port's >> > OPTIONSFILE is derived from it, and non-uniqueness can lead to ports= >> > fighting over control of that file? Which is bad when unintentional= , >> > but can be useful for some related ports to share the same options s= ettings. > Well this is the right thing to do but looking at bsd.port.mk and the c= hanges > needed I get bored and gave up :( I haven't looked at what would be necessary to fix UNIQUENAME collisions in any great detail, but I think a number are due to setting PORTNAME to something basically incorrect. >> > Does pkgng really need LATEST_LINK at all? As far as I recall, that= >> > only exists so that the user can say: > Well no pkgng doesn't need it at all except for pkg itself for the boot= strap :) Hmmm... so there just has to be pkg.txz at some predictable URL(s) on the FBSD mirrors? That doesn't sound like enough to justify keeping LATEST_LINK related bits in the ports tree. >> > I don't see the problem with port prefixes changing UNIQUENAME. Isn= 't >> > py27-foo conceptually a different port to py30-foo ? Yes, they are >> > built from the same port ORIGIN, but you already intend dropping the= >> > one-to-one correspondence between port ORIGINS and packages with the= >> > introduction of sub-ports. > Maybe they are different packages, but they have the same options, and = from > pkgng we should be able to detect it as the same package just a differe= nt > runtime which is what they are. I think I see. You're thinking of packages that install the same files, but maybe in a different location (eg. SITE_PERL) or that register run-time dependencies on a number of different possible providers. Couldn't that boil down to having several alternate .MANIFEST files in the pkg? Plus some sort of final-location-independent way of naming the files to be installed by the package? On the matter of having alternate RUN_DEPENDS to be set at install time? I've wanted to do something like that with databases/phpmyadmin for ages. Most of the optional dependencies there are autodetected by the PHP code at run-time, so it should be possible to just ask the user which of them they want to have during pkg installation. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig7DAD64CC3C9D3B7795A1D430 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/V18QACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxHBACfZ39I2HAY+dmx56DvTUojCuLy OkAAoIJ3GJWj2y8CcyoufwgOYeU0oBWx =f1wY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7DAD64CC3C9D3B7795A1D430-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 11:55:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEDDD106564A for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:55:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13758FC14; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:55:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BBtWpO006041; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:55:32 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5BBtW3j006040; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:55:32 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@freebsd.org using -f Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:55:29 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20120611115529.GV60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD591DF.3060808@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611103221.GU60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD5D7B8.9080504@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Avw2VvEbzfULB0h1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FD5D7B8.9080504@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:55:33 -0000 --Avw2VvEbzfULB0h1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:34:16PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 11/06/2012 11:32, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> UNIQUENAME importance being because the default location for a port's > >> > OPTIONSFILE is derived from it, and non-uniqueness can lead to ports > >> > fighting over control of that file? Which is bad when unintentional, > >> > but can be useful for some related ports to share the same options s= ettings. >=20 > > Well this is the right thing to do but looking at bsd.port.mk and the c= hanges > > needed I get bored and gave up :( >=20 > I haven't looked at what would be necessary to fix UNIQUENAME collisions > in any great detail, but I think a number are due to setting PORTNAME to > something basically incorrect. In fact there are 3 majors guilty: - bsd.python.mk - bsd.ruby.mk - bsd.apache.mk why because they recommand their user to set PKGNAMEPREFIX to ${BLA_PKGNAMEPREFIX} so that their prefix can be set from bsd.port.mk Which mean that until the said bsd.$guilty.mk is included UNIQUENAME name i= s set to ${PKGNAMEPREFIX}${PORTNAME} with PKGNAMEPREFIX being expanded to nothing and once bsd.$guilty.mk is included ${PKGNAMEPREFIX} expands to something a= nd so UNIQUENAME is changed. (btw also break the options framework (old and new) = with the ports because OPTIONSFILE is created using the ${UNIQUENAME} second problem is that uniquename can potentially be shared between ports f= or example nginx and nginx-devel and in general all the -devel ports >=20 > >> > Does pkgng really need LATEST_LINK at all? As far as I recall, that > >> > only exists so that the user can say: >=20 > > Well no pkgng doesn't need it at all except for pkg itself for the boot= strap :) >=20 > Hmmm... so there just has to be pkg.txz at some predictable URL(s) on > the FBSD mirrors? That doesn't sound like enough to justify keeping > LATEST_LINK related bits in the ports tree. Once pkg_install is gone then LATEST_LINK can go away > I think I see. You're thinking of packages that install the same files, > but maybe in a different location (eg. SITE_PERL) or that register > run-time dependencies on a number of different possible providers. >=20 > Couldn't that boil down to having several alternate .MANIFEST files in > the pkg? Plus some sort of final-location-independent way of naming the > files to be installed by the package? >=20 > On the matter of having alternate RUN_DEPENDS to be set at install time? > I've wanted to do something like that with databases/phpmyadmin for > ages. Most of the optional dependencies there are autodetected by the > PHP code at run-time, so it should be possible to just ask the user > which of them they want to have during pkg installation. That is over complicated imho, and I don't like much the interactive instal= lers, most of people would want to automated the whole installing process. regards, Bapt --Avw2VvEbzfULB0h1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/V3LEACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExkvwCcD/ejJLAUbspCRNhmrEzU4jqq nvwAn3/bvjpt9kIKUyYjAJfxInzEaPZd =UqB9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Avw2VvEbzfULB0h1-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 12:32:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA501065673; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:32:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vmagerya@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B752F8FC17; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eabm6 with SMTP id m6so330626eab.13 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:32:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DDsta/7dSqyKsQr5zn6nVPyU1//Z/V13AIXep8ZA6p4=; b=0RLe3bemcY1ymcURG2FN5GmKYNVy8zmoiavVqPXDNuT+fEJxxKmTVBjCpC5bx1AeCv zajhC1toL6+jvG5kGe46OYqTMilCGYPi7MZllNnErJmN0pHje1hU3afW9JAW+E8AbdFY lE3ZK6KR6v6FKUxvnp3Nq20laVw1SJg97P7DZ+yGW4w0xqjB7sye84fSdo1eW/YaskS0 JZYX1sOJRbmp2reBeQmNhnYhd0bldHKBFb4YEP/PTu8YwS3ecQCy5IMsxwaL+5Zs8pIp eQLy4lMVLlaqWC1Nq1T5MKB5M+kY3EeqGasqf0mmoKQgFmo5QehZ+g+RPqrQN8oEhd4h 4veg== Received: by 10.14.47.72 with SMTP id s48mr5997718eeb.130.1339417946266; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:32:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.29.1.142] (altimet-gw.cs2.dp.wnet.ua. [217.20.178.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g46sm23950275eea.14.2012.06.11.05.32.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 05:32:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FD5E522.4020506@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:31:30 +0300 From: Vitaly Magerya User-Agent: Thunderbird MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120611073017.GT60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20120611073017.GT60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Eitan Adler Subject: Re: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:32:33 -0000 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> Perhaps we could introduce UNIQUE_ORIGIN which is >> ${ORIGIN}_${SUBPACKAGE} or something of the sort? > > I thought about this one, but while here we should think about package move > which keeps being the same package, in that case origin will change, and the > uniquename will change which is no good for binary world. Does pkgng handle MOVED during upgrades? If so, ${ORIGIN}_${SUBPACKAGE} will work fine, if not -- then it should; relying on unique name not to change is fragile. For example when audio/polypaudio was renamed to audio/pulseaudio, it would be unreasonable to keep it's unique name as "polyaudio". From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 12:36:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF251065674 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:36:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C760B8FC12 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:36:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B947E852 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 04:36:03 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4FD5E630.3090908@acsalaska.net> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:36:00 +0200 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD591DF.3060808@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611103221.GU60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20120611103221.GU60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:36:05 -0000 On 11-6-2012 12:32, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 07:36:15AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 11/06/2012 05:30, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> In the ports tree we lack a unique identifier, while we could live without it >>> until now, it is more than needed for 2 upcoming features: pkgng and stage >>> directory support. >>> >>> unique means something that will always be the same what ever the options are >>> and what ever the runtime they use are. But also means unique in term of in the >>> whole ports no other package will share its identifier. >>> >>> currently the only equivalent of this in the ports tree is the origin of a >>> package, which will no more be unique with the upcoming sub package support >>> (coming along with stage directory) aka 1 origin to produce n package. >>> >>> UNIQUENAME and LATEST_LINK fails in that area because they both can change >>> according to the runtime: py27- for example which will become py30- if you >>> change the default python. >>> LATEST_LINK by default also append the PKGNAMEPREFIX which some ports can be >>> really creative with. >>> >>> should we introduce something new, should we fix one of the above? do you have >>> any suggestion? UNIQUENAME is a clear name. Abusing it should simply not happen and this is a case of badly chosen defaults. This is a variable that should not have a default as it's too expensive to check whether the chosen default lives up to the standard (being "ports-tree wide unique"), unless you make this a UUID, which is probably not desirable from an operator/transparency perspective to have a hierarchy like: /var/db/ports/PPPP-QQQQ-RRRR-SSSS/options. Ideally, a port maintainer should assign a uniquename and be responsible for it. In turn, bsd.port.mk should throw a fit if UNIQUENAME is not set rather then providing a guess that works "most of the time". >> I was looking at this. You'ld think from the name that UNIQUENAME is >> the appropriate variable here. Yet by my calculations there are 1439 >> ports using non-unique UNIQUENAME variables. Fixing that seems like >> common sense to me: why call it unique if it isn't? >> >> UNIQUENAME importance being because the default location for a port's >> OPTIONSFILE is derived from it, and non-uniqueness can lead to ports >> fighting over control of that file? Which is bad when unintentional, >> but can be useful for some related ports to share the same options settings. If you want to share an options file, you should share the OPTIONSFILE. Knowing what UNIQUENAME is used for should not be a vehicle to using it as in the future it can be used for more things or be disconnected from the functionality you were using it for. > Maybe they are different packages, but they have the same options, and from > pkgng we should be able to detect it as the same package just a different > runtime which is what they are. Not if they install in version-specific "site-packages". Then they really are different packages, since the packing list will be different after expansion of variables. If you count that as "same package", then definitions are getting real fuzzy and I'm not sure how well that's going to play out in the long run. The degradation of UNIQUENAME is an excellent example of how things clearly named end up being not what they are. And finally there's the case where extra stuff gets patched or installed based on the interpreter version. Good example is various perl ports where functionality from a CPAN module has been integrated into the perl port itself. So, older modules installed with older versions have (one or more) extra dependencies. On the plus side, these ports don't change UNIQUENAME, but that is just an implementation issue. I don't know of any python ports that change dependencies based on interpreter version, but I wouldn't be surprised if there are some. All this only enforces my view that we should standardize versioned ports and I've started working on it. bsd.databases.mk will be the victim of my first iteration. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 13:00:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61740106566C for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:00:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCD58FC19 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:00:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CC27E853 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 04:59:58 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4FD5EBCD.5010005@acsalaska.net> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:59:57 +0200 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4FD586EF.20100@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4FD586EF.20100@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: OPTIONSng and OPTIONS_SINGLE, OPTIONS_MULTI X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:00:00 -0000 On 11-6-2012 7:49, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Surely it is more sensible to say that OPTIONS_SINGLE is strictly > 'choose one from these options.' Then you can implement 'zero or one of > these options' by: > > OPTIONS_SINGLE= EXAMPLE > OPTIONS_SINGLE_EXAMPLE= FOO BAR BAZ BLURFL NONE_OF_THE_ABOVE I like this approach and it would be nice if you can have a standard "none" option, rendered in the dialog consistently "none" with text "none of the above", but translated to ${GROUPNAME}_NONE for the port and optionsfile. The group should be indented so one sees what "of the above" applies to. So the definition would look like: OPTIONS_NONEORONE= EXAMPLE OPTIONS_NONEORONE_EXAMPLE= BLONDE BRUNETTE And the port's test would be: .if ${OPTIONS:MEXAMPLE_NONE} # yay, no work for me .else # crap which one he pick .endif -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 13:10:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9314B1065672; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:10:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from cp-out7.libero.it (cp-out7.libero.it [212.52.84.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02058FC18; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:10:39 +0000 (UTC) X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0208.4FD5EE49.01D0,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-libjamoibt: 1555 Received: from soth.ventu (151.41.153.204) by cp-out7.libero.it (8.5.133) id 4FD1BC23007F66D6; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:10:33 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5BDARwi066203; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:10:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4FD5EE43.3050308@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:10:27 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120609 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, sem@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 on 10.1.2.13 Cc: Subject: portupgrade omniORB X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:10:40 -0000 Hello. It looks like I cannot portupgrade omniORB. Solution is to deinstall and reinstall, but I thought I'd report this. bye av. ... ---> Uninstallation of omniORB-4.1.6 ended at: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:55:47 +0200 (consumed 00:00:12) ---> Installation of devel/omniORB started at: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:55:47 +0200 ---> Installing the new version via the port ===> Installing for omniORB-4.1.6 ===> omniORB-4.1.6 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found ===> omniORB-4.1.6 depends on executable: pkg-config - found ===> Generating temporary packing list making install in ./src... gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/local/storage/tmp/usr/ports/devel/omniORB/work/omniORB-4.1.6/src' making install in src/tool... gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/local/storage/tmp/usr/ports/devel/omniORB/work/omniORB-4.1.6/src/tool' making install in src/tool/omkdepend... gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/local/local/storage/tmp/usr/ports/devel/omniORB/work/omniORB-4.1.6/src/tool/omkdepend' + /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel -m 0755 omkdepend /usr/local/bin gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/local/storage/tmp/usr/ports/devel/omniORB/work/omniORB-4.1.6/src/tool/omkdepend' making install in src/tool/omniidl... gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/local/local/storage/tmp/usr/ports/devel/omniORB/work/omniORB-4.1.6/src/tool/omniidl' making install in src/tool/omniidl/cxx... gmake[4]: Entering directory `/usr/local/local/storage/tmp/usr/ports/devel/omniORB/work/omniORB-4.1.6/src/tool/omniidl/cxx' making install in src/tool/omniidl/cxx/cccp... gmake[5]: Entering directory `/usr/local/local/storage/tmp/usr/ports/devel/omniORB/work/omniORB-4.1.6/src/tool/omniidl/cxx/cccp' + /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel -m 0755 omnicpp /usr/local/bin gmake[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/local/storage/tmp/usr/ports/devel/omniORB/work/omniORB-4.1.6/src/tool/omniidl/cxx/cccp' gmake[4]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/local/include/omniORB4/CORBA_sysdep.h', needed by `y.tab.o'. Stop. gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/local/storage/tmp/usr/ports/devel/omniORB/work/omniORB-4.1.6/src/tool/omniidl/cxx' gmake[3]: *** [install] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/local/storage/tmp/usr/ports/devel/omniORB/work/omniORB-4.1.6/src/tool/omniidl' gmake[2]: *** [install] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/local/storage/tmp/usr/ports/devel/omniORB/work/omniORB-4.1.6/src/tool' gmake[1]: *** [install] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/local/storage/tmp/usr/ports/devel/omniORB/work/omniORB-4.1.6/src' gmake: *** [install] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/omniORB. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/omniORB. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade20120611-27468-1wab2uj-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=omniORB-4.1.6 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=4.1.6 make -DFORCE_PKG_REGISTER reinstall ---> Restoring the old version ---> Removing old package' ** Fix the installation problem and try again. ---> Installation of devel/omniORB ended at: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:55:53 +0200 (consumed 00:00:05) ---> Reinstallation of devel/omniORB ended at: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:55:53 +0200 (consumed 00:05:49) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 13:12:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA0D106566B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:12:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C988FC0C; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:12:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BDCOgw081074; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:12:24 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5BDCOWr081073; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:12:24 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@freebsd.org using -f Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:12:22 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Vitaly Magerya Message-ID: <20120611131222.GW60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120611073017.GT60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD5E522.4020506@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RMorpr61ug7CvG36" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FD5E522.4020506@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Eitan Adler Subject: Re: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:12:25 -0000 --RMorpr61ug7CvG36 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 03:31:30PM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> Perhaps we could introduce UNIQUE_ORIGIN which is > >> ${ORIGIN}_${SUBPACKAGE} or something of the sort? > >=20 > > I thought about this one, but while here we should think about package = move > > which keeps being the same package, in that case origin will change, an= d the > > uniquename will change which is no good for binary world. >=20 > Does pkgng handle MOVED during upgrades? If so, ${ORIGIN}_${SUBPACKAGE} > will work fine, if not -- then it should; relying on unique name not to > change is fragile. pkgng doesn't handle MOVED yet and having a unique identifier for for packa= ge would simplify 90% of the move cases. Plus ${ORIGIN}_${SUBPACKAGE} is fragile because you can have a port which = is: lang/mylang with a subpackage bla which will give lang/mylang_bla=20 and a port lang/mylang_bla with no subpackage which will give lang/mylang_= bla regards, Bapt --RMorpr61ug7CvG36 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/V7rYACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExmFwCgvDLVEIA5rJJKiRuMIowcg9Rm 3n4An3naBD2ajVvSsu1aeixLmWNML4RD =dZe0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RMorpr61ug7CvG36-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 13:17:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBA41065672; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:17:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B143B8FC0A; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:17:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BDHTlc080224 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:17:29 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q5BDHTlc080224 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1339420649; bh=5Q90XzreCJX/EivwpsM5GWJipTbyht0t37eTv1t8hds=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Message-ID:Mime-Version; b=y3ghpGQOELz3DdiFzyt8S8f8HdFtcBsmaQKjrTLRuBUnXmoErU2G3oQG0B4Ai1/6f 7fc1LSXg46HExXpPu6VgyEFawVFyPExIHld8bp/AJ5YikM1jG9R51tQHz0BpTHjwZs 6WmUIvEOQC2PmBy0lfDltPQfVtJAmVQSEyFjk6xk= Message-ID: <4FD5EFE1.30200@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:17:21 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120601 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD591DF.3060808@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611103221.GU60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD5D7B8.9080504@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611115529.GV60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20120611115529.GV60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig76A27F98D701ABB48E1B2102" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_ALL,DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:17:38 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig76A27F98D701ABB48E1B2102 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/06/2012 12:55, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > why because they recommand their user to set PKGNAMEPREFIX to > ${BLA_PKGNAMEPREFIX} so that their prefix can be set from bsd.port.mk > Which mean that until the said bsd.$guilty.mk is included UNIQUENAME na= me is set > to ${PKGNAMEPREFIX}${PORTNAME} with PKGNAMEPREFIX being expanded to not= hing > and once bsd.$guilty.mk is included ${PKGNAMEPREFIX} expands to somethi= ng and so > UNIQUENAME is changed. (btw also break the options framework (old and n= ew) with > the ports because OPTIONSFILE is created using the ${UNIQUENAME} A light dawns. Yes. The value of $OPTIONSFILE cannot depend on anything that happens in the port after bsd.port.options.mk is .include'd= =2E How about this (untested): % cvs diff cvs diff: Diffing . Index: bsd.options.mk =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/Mk/bsd.options.mk,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.13 bsd.options.mk --- bsd.options.mk 6 Jun 2012 11:47:29 -0000 1.13 +++ bsd.options.mk 11 Jun 2012 13:03:47 -0000 @@ -8,8 +8,6 @@ # global ones and ending with the ones decided by the maintainer. # Options global to the entire ports tree -OPTIONSFILE?=3D ${PORT_DBDIR}/${UNIQUENAME}/options - #ALL_OPTIONS=3D DOCS \ # NLS Index: bsd.port.mk =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk,v retrieving revision 1.727 diff -u -r1.727 bsd.port.mk --- bsd.port.mk 8 Jun 2012 19:52:39 -0000 1.727 +++ bsd.port.mk 11 Jun 2012 13:06:35 -0000 @@ -1268,6 +1268,10 @@ UNIQUENAME?=3D ${PKGNAMEPREFIX}${PORTNAME} .endif +.if !defined(OPTIONSFILE) +OPTIONSFILE:=3D ${PORT_DBDIR}/${UNIQUENAME}/options +.endif + .endif DOS2UNIX_REGEX?=3D .* So OPTIONSFILE is at least independent of any changes to PKGNAMEPREFIX made by bsd.$guilty.mk? Port maintainers wishing to override the default OPTIONSFILE setting should obviously do that before the inclusion of bsd.port.options.mk Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig76A27F98D701ABB48E1B2102 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/V7+kACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxVNACfS+TWU9IXe1zXGndPPI6deAwB t6oAnAj0QLyT+OwvUMkdtjpkMIgCRCvo =Y8tI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig76A27F98D701ABB48E1B2102-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 13:50:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B12C106564A for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:50:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE238FC0C; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BDokpP014620; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:50:46 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5BDok9B014588; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:50:46 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@freebsd.org using -f Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:50:43 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20120611135043.GX60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD591DF.3060808@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611103221.GU60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD5D7B8.9080504@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611115529.GV60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD5EFE1.30200@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LmcuB6YxSMQAV95c" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FD5EFE1.30200@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:50:47 -0000 --LmcuB6YxSMQAV95c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 02:17:21PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 11/06/2012 12:55, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > why because they recommand their user to set PKGNAMEPREFIX to > > ${BLA_PKGNAMEPREFIX} so that their prefix can be set from bsd.port.mk > > Which mean that until the said bsd.$guilty.mk is included UNIQUENAME na= me is set > > to ${PKGNAMEPREFIX}${PORTNAME} with PKGNAMEPREFIX being expanded to not= hing > > and once bsd.$guilty.mk is included ${PKGNAMEPREFIX} expands to somethi= ng and so > > UNIQUENAME is changed. (btw also break the options framework (old and n= ew) with > > the ports because OPTIONSFILE is created using the ${UNIQUENAME} >=20 > A light dawns. Yes. The value of $OPTIONSFILE cannot depend on > anything that happens in the port after bsd.port.options.mk is .include'd. >=20 > How about this (untested): I tried what you did :) but it doesn't work because On first pass (before bsd.port.options.mk: PORTNAME is test UNIQUENAME is ${PKGNAMEPREFIX}${PORTNAME} and PKGNAMEPREFIX is for example ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX} and ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX} is empty. which means after BLA:=3D ${UNIQUENAME} Only the first level is expanded and so: BLA is now ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}test if use in first pass then it becomes test when used after bsd.port.pre.mk PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX become py27- and so BLA is py27- The joy of make(1) >=20 > % cvs diff > cvs diff: Diffing . > Index: bsd.options.mk > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/Mk/bsd.options.mk,v > retrieving revision 1.13 > diff -u -r1.13 bsd.options.mk > --- bsd.options.mk 6 Jun 2012 11:47:29 -0000 1.13 > +++ bsd.options.mk 11 Jun 2012 13:03:47 -0000 > @@ -8,8 +8,6 @@ > # global ones and ending with the ones decided by the maintainer. > # Options global to the entire ports tree >=20 > -OPTIONSFILE?=3D ${PORT_DBDIR}/${UNIQUENAME}/options > - > #ALL_OPTIONS=3D DOCS \ > # NLS >=20 > Index: bsd.port.mk > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk,v > retrieving revision 1.727 > diff -u -r1.727 bsd.port.mk > --- bsd.port.mk 8 Jun 2012 19:52:39 -0000 1.727 > +++ bsd.port.mk 11 Jun 2012 13:06:35 -0000 > @@ -1268,6 +1268,10 @@ > UNIQUENAME?=3D ${PKGNAMEPREFIX}${PORTNAME} > .endif >=20 > +.if !defined(OPTIONSFILE) > +OPTIONSFILE:=3D ${PORT_DBDIR}/${UNIQUENAME}/options > +.endif > + > .endif >=20 > DOS2UNIX_REGEX?=3D .* >=20 > So OPTIONSFILE is at least independent of any changes to PKGNAMEPREFIX > made by bsd.$guilty.mk? >=20 > Port maintainers wishing to override the default OPTIONSFILE setting > should obviously do that before the inclusion of bsd.port.options.mk >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Matthew >=20 > --=20 > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW >=20 >=20 >=20 --LmcuB6YxSMQAV95c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/V97MACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExoywCfSrK2LZ3ZUwDCj/W4YOW6dvho zf0An2nKh/MGjK/vhope42TK/p1It80G =CaX5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LmcuB6YxSMQAV95c-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 14:00:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93641065672; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:00:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495AF8FC15; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:00:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BE0rcH082843; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:00:53 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q5BE0rmt082840; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:00:53 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:00:53 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Baptiste Daroussin In-Reply-To: <20120611051759.GQ60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> Message-ID: References: <20120611051759.GQ60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:00:54 -0600 (MDT) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Jason Helfman Subject: Re: NOPORTDOCS and NOPORTEXAMPLES X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:00:56 -0000 On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 06:05:49PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: >> On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Jason Helfman wrote: >> >>>> So references to NOPORTDOCS should be replaced with references to >>>> PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS now? Why that but not NOPORTEXAMPLES? >>> >>> You can use PORT_OPTIONS:MEXAMPLES for this case. >>> >>> I believe I did this recently in www/flot >> >> But only after bsd.port.options.mk is included. Here's what I was >> trying to do: >> >> .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS} >> OPTIONS_DEFINE+= REFDOCS >> REFDOCS_DESC= Install the reference documents >> OPTIONS_DEFAULT+= REFDOCS >> .endif >> >> .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MEXAMPLES} >> OPTIONS_DEFINE+= EXAMPLES >> EXAMPLES_DESC= Install the example code >> OPTIONS_DEFAULT+= EXAMPLES >> .endif >> >> .include >> > > Why not simply that way: > > OPTIONS_DEFINE= ... DOCS EXAMPLES > > DOCS_DESC= Install the reference documents > > And done. > > Condtion an EXAMPLES on EXAMPLES options doesn't make sense to me. > > by default DOCS and EXAMPLES are on expect if the user set NOPORTDOCS, > NOPORTEXAMPLES or OPTIONS_UNSET= DOCS EXAMPLES The logic has probably gotten twisted around, and it's been long enough since I did this that I don't recall the situation. I think it was just to prevent the options screen from appearing if NOPORTDOCS and NOPORTEXAMPLES were set. I don't see a way to do that without using the old versions of those variables. The new ones have not been set until after bsd.port.options.mk is included, and by then the dialog has been shown. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 14:07:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17E7106566B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:07:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AA28FC15; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:07:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BE7SAt029682; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:07:28 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5BE7SJK029680; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:07:28 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@freebsd.org using -f Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:07:26 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Warren Block Message-ID: <20120611140725.GY60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120611051759.GQ60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XiX5sJQOWZsNRXst" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Jason Helfman Subject: Re: NOPORTDOCS and NOPORTEXAMPLES X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:07:28 -0000 --XiX5sJQOWZsNRXst Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 08:00:53AM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >=20 > > On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 06:05:49PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > >> On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Jason Helfman wrote: > >> > >>>> So references to NOPORTDOCS should be replaced with references to > >>>> PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS now? Why that but not NOPORTEXAMPLES? > >>> > >>> You can use PORT_OPTIONS:MEXAMPLES for this case. > >>> > >>> I believe I did this recently in www/flot > >> > >> But only after bsd.port.options.mk is included. Here's what I was > >> trying to do: > >> > >> .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS} > >> OPTIONS_DEFINE+=3D REFDOCS > >> REFDOCS_DESC=3D Install the reference documents > >> OPTIONS_DEFAULT+=3D REFDOCS > >> .endif > >> > >> .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MEXAMPLES} > >> OPTIONS_DEFINE+=3D EXAMPLES > >> EXAMPLES_DESC=3D Install the example code > >> OPTIONS_DEFAULT+=3D EXAMPLES > >> .endif > >> > >> .include > >> > > > > Why not simply that way: > > > > OPTIONS_DEFINE=3D ... DOCS EXAMPLES > > > > DOCS_DESC=3D Install the reference documents > > > > And done. > > > > Condtion an EXAMPLES on EXAMPLES options doesn't make sense to me. > > > > by default DOCS and EXAMPLES are on expect if the user set NOPORTDOCS, > > NOPORTEXAMPLES or OPTIONS_UNSET=3D DOCS EXAMPLES >=20 > The logic has probably gotten twisted around, and it's been long enough= =20 > since I did this that I don't recall the situation. I think it was just= =20 > to prevent the options screen from appearing if NOPORTDOCS and=20 > NOPORTEXAMPLES were set. >=20 > I don't see a way to do that without using the old versions of those=20 > variables. The new ones have not been set until after=20 > bsd.port.options.mk is included, and by then the dialog has been shown. Do not put OPTIONS_DEFINE and you won't get a dialog UI but still can test PORT_OPTIONS:MEXAMPLES and PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS regards, Bapt --XiX5sJQOWZsNRXst Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEUEARECAAYFAk/V+50ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExXjQCeKRPoVKOZgreOY6oxkfpgMDux xggAkQHuq0bQA1VWt3xLYycvDsW3UZg= =vJcS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XiX5sJQOWZsNRXst-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 14:17:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF131065674; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:17:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8528C8FC0A; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:17:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BEH8uH082956; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:17:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q5BEH8aV082953; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:17:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:17:08 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Baptiste Daroussin In-Reply-To: <20120611140725.GY60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> Message-ID: References: <20120611051759.GQ60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120611140725.GY60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:17:08 -0600 (MDT) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Jason Helfman Subject: Re: NOPORTDOCS and NOPORTEXAMPLES X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:17:10 -0000 On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> The logic has probably gotten twisted around, and it's been long enough >> since I did this that I don't recall the situation. I think it was just >> to prevent the options screen from appearing if NOPORTDOCS and >> NOPORTEXAMPLES were set. >> >> I don't see a way to do that without using the old versions of those >> variables. The new ones have not been set until after >> bsd.port.options.mk is included, and by then the dialog has been shown. > > Do not put OPTIONS_DEFINE and you won't get a dialog UI but still can test > PORT_OPTIONS:MEXAMPLES and PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS The original: .if !defined(NOPORTDOCS) OPTIONS+= REFDOCS "Install the reference documents" on .endif .if !defined(NOPORTEXAMPLES) OPTIONS+= EXAMPLES "Install the example code" on .endif .include So if the user has set NOPORTDOCS in make.conf, that option does not appear in the dialog. Likewise with NOPORTEXAMPLES, and if both are set, the dialog does not appear at all. If either docs or examples are allowed, the user gets the chance to turn them off for this port. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 14:20:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8481065691 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:20:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91F38FC0A for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BEKdeC082984; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:20:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q5BEKd5i082981; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:20:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:20:39 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Waitman Gobble In-Reply-To: <1339393493.11967@da3m0n8t3r.com> Message-ID: References: <1339393493.11967@da3m0n8t3r.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/Mixed; BOUNDARY=bound1339393493 Content-ID: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:20:39 -0600 (MDT) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpng.so.6 missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:20:46 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --bound1339393493 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-ID: On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote: > Hi, > > I was reading the handbook about burning DVD's and thought I would check out K3b as recommended... so I attempted to install from ports. After an hour or so of the make script building a whole bunch of stuff my patience wore out, and I bailed. > > ports tree csup this morning. > > Now it seems many things that were working great will no longer load, it's missing libpng.so.6 > > # SciTE > Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by "libpangocairo-1.0.so.0" Always, yes, always read /usr/ports/UPDATING before updating ports. And if you've update the ports tree but not updated installed applications from it, do that first. 20120531: AFFECTS: users of graphics/png AUTHOR: dinoex@FreeBSD.org The PNG library has been updated to version 1.5.10. Please rebuild all ports that depend on it. If you use portmaster: portmaster -r png- If you use portupgrade: portupgrade -fr graphics/png --bound1339393493 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: INLINE _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --bound1339393493-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 14:24:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD2A51065670 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:24:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbsd@isgroup.com.ua) Received: from mail.standard.com.ua (mail.isgroup.com.ua [46.229.54.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5908FC1D for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (unused-213.111.71.69.bilink.ua [213.111.71.69] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.standard.com.ua (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5BDvGXg019094 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:57:16 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from mbsd@isgroup.com.ua) From: mbsd To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20120610084743.GA2999@tinyCurrent> References: <20111118125403.GA1255@tiny> <201111221737.04353.makc@freebsd.org> <20120610084743.GA2999@tinyCurrent> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:03:06 +0300 Message-ID: <1339419786.2313.4.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=9.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.isgroup.com.ua Subject: Re: ports/textproc/stardict3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:24:04 -0000 Hi, for me it doesn't build with clang nor with gcc. clang++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/usr/local/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -Wall -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT -DORBIT2=1 -I/usr/local/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/cairo -I/usr/local/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/gio-unix-2.0/ -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/include/libpng15 -I/usr/local/include/drm -I/usr/local/include/libgnomeui-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/libart-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/local/include/gnome-keyring-1 -I/usr/local/include/libgnome-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/libbonoboui-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/libgnomecanvas-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include -I/usr/local/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/libxml2 -I/usr/local/include/gail-1.0 -I.. -I.. -I../src -I../src/lib -I../../lib/src -I/usr/local/include -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -MT t_lookupdata.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/t_lookupdata.Tpo -c -o t_lookupdata.o t_lookupdata.cpp t_lookupdata.cpp:41:30: error: variable length array of non-POD element type 'std::vector' std::vector reslist[dictmask.size()]; ^ 1 error generated. gmake[2]: *** [t_lookupdata.o] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/usr/ports/textproc/stardict3/work/stardict-3.0.3/dict/tests' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/usr/ports/textproc/stardict3/work/stardict-3.0.3/dict' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/stardict3. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/stardict3. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade20120611-5671-f1rp3x env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=stardict-3.0.3 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=3.0.3 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! textproc/stardict3 (stardict-3.0.3) (unknown build error) zsh: exit 1 sudo portupgrade -f stardict-3.0.3 With gcc it crushes in the same line. My system is 9-stable. I built stardict with GNOME support. Png and other ports had already upgraded at the moment of built. Is it problem only mine? On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 10:47 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Tuesday, November 22, 2011 a las 05:37:03PM +0000, Max Brazhnikov escribió: > > > On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:54:04 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > The port (ports tree from CVS) ports/textproc/stardict3 > > > > > > ports/textproc/stardict3 > > > PORTVERSION= 3.0.3 > > > MAINTAINER= makc@FreeBSD.org > > > > > > installs fine on 10-CURRENT, but the application just crahes or runs > > > into a CPU loop; if it runs into CPU loop there is a core file of 'troff', > > > i.e. it seems that it started for some man page reason the troff(1) and > > > after this it loops; > > Stardict has plugin for displaying man pages. > > > > > ... > > > I could go back to 3.0.3 and provide more details of the crash, but I > > > can't debug or solve this on my own. Or should I file a bug report? > > > > backtrace would be nice to have. > > Hi Max, > > I've installed another fresh 10-CURRENT (r235646, ports from CVS as of > May 19) and luckily it crashes again reproduceable; a bt of gdb looks > like this: > > $ gdb /usr/local/bin/stardict stardict.core > ... > #0 0x2966868b in thr_kill () from /lib/libc.so.7 > [New Thread 29c07e00 (LWP 100375/stardict)] > [New Thread 29c03300 (LWP 100369/stardict)] > [New Thread 29c03080 (LWP 100203/stardict)] > (gdb) bt > #0 0x2966868b in thr_kill () from /lib/libc.so.7 > #1 0x295ffed6 in pthread_sigmask () from /lib/libthr.so.3 > #2 0x296005ab in raise () from /lib/libthr.so.3 > #3 0x2971ddea in abort () from /lib/libc.so.7 > #4 0x291bb6ec in g_assertion_message () from > /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #5 0x291bbd4d in g_assertion_message_expr () > from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #6 0x08118a6b in HttpClient::on_connected () > #7 0x0805a232 in ?? () > #8 0x0805e63a in ?? () > #9 0x080b8e69 in std::operator+, > std::allocator > () > #10 0x080b8eab in std::operator+, > std::allocator > () > #11 0x28965591 in gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__VOID () > from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #12 0x2911bea3 in g_closure_invoke () from > /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 > #13 0x29133992 in g_signal_handlers_block_matched () > from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 > #14 0x291359f0 in g_signal_emit_valist () > from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 > #15 0x29135c70 in g_signal_emit_by_name () > from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 > #16 0x289ce2f2 in gtk_target_list_unref () > from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #17 0x289ce6a5 in gtk_target_list_unref () > from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #18 0x289671c4 in gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__VOID () > from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #19 0x2911a767 in g_ptr_array_get_type () > from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 > #20 0x2911bea3 in g_closure_invoke () from > /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 > #21 0x29133b58 in g_signal_handlers_block_matched () > from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 > #22 0x29135706 in g_signal_emit_valist () > from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 > #23 0x29135d45 in g_signal_emit () from > /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 > #24 0x28a8dc66 in gtk_widget_style_attach () > from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #25 0x289611e5 in gtk_main_do_event () from > /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #26 0x28c49f1a in gdk_add_client_message_filter () > from /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #27 0x291952d7 in g_main_context_dispatch () > from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #28 0x2919935e in g_main_context_prepare () > from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #29 0x29199767 in g_main_loop_run () from > /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #30 0x289615c4 in gtk_main () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #31 0x0806482b in ?? () > #32 0x08064db1 in ?? () > #33 0x08058a46 in ?? () > #34 0x00000001 in ?? () > #35 0xbfbfe724 in ?? () > #36 0xbfbfe72c in ?? () > #37 0xbfbfe6d8 in ?? () > #38 0x00000000 in ?? () > #39 0x00000000 in ?? () > #40 0x00000000 in ?? () > #41 0xbfbfe710 in ?? () > #42 0xbfbfe720 in ?? () > #43 0x00000000 in ?? () > #44 0xbfbfe71c in ?? () > #45 0x080589c8 in ?? () > Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) > > Does this help? Let me know if you need more info or want me test > changes in the source. > > Thanks > > matthias > > -- > Matthias Apitz > t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 > e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ > UNIX since V7 on PDP-11 | UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) > UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2 | FreeBSD since 2.2.5 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 14:26:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62427106566C for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:26:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E7C8FC18; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:26:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BEQjdi048127; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:26:45 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5BEQiUJ048126; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:26:44 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@freebsd.org using -f Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:26:42 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Warren Block Message-ID: <20120611142642.GZ60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120611051759.GQ60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120611140725.GY60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5FDiZl1vRbLRjwwc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Jason Helfman Subject: Re: NOPORTDOCS and NOPORTEXAMPLES X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:26:45 -0000 --5FDiZl1vRbLRjwwc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 08:17:08AM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >=20 > >> The logic has probably gotten twisted around, and it's been long enough > >> since I did this that I don't recall the situation. I think it was ju= st > >> to prevent the options screen from appearing if NOPORTDOCS and > >> NOPORTEXAMPLES were set. > >> > >> I don't see a way to do that without using the old versions of those > >> variables. The new ones have not been set until after > >> bsd.port.options.mk is included, and by then the dialog has been shown. > > > > Do not put OPTIONS_DEFINE and you won't get a dialog UI but still can t= est > > PORT_OPTIONS:MEXAMPLES and PORT_OPTIONS:MDOCS >=20 > The original: >=20 > .if !defined(NOPORTDOCS) > OPTIONS+=3D REFDOCS "Install the reference documents" on > .endif > .if !defined(NOPORTEXAMPLES) > OPTIONS+=3D EXAMPLES "Install the example code" on > .endif >=20 > .include >=20 > So if the user has set NOPORTDOCS in make.conf, that option does not=20 > appear in the dialog. Likewise with NOPORTEXAMPLES, and if both are=20 > set, the dialog does not appear at all. >=20 > If either docs or examples are allowed, the user gets the chance to turn= =20 > them off for this port. While I understand it is not consistent and doesn't make much sense. It had sense at the time of the old framework because the old framework wasn't consistent, ie: NOPORTDOCS in make.conf had no effect on the default dialog. But now it is consistent NOPORTDOCS disable DOCS by default. but maybe the = use want to set it on for that particular package. regards, Bapt --5FDiZl1vRbLRjwwc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/WACIACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExNwgCgsT4OPDAo8zN9RIV2Y8ifILlU d8MAoIPLb9dimAfb39hG3v33UavN9Y6l =N5+R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5FDiZl1vRbLRjwwc-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 15:36:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBBC1065672 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:36:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0158FC14; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:36:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BFaH1o015423; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:36:17 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5BFaGTs015421; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:36:16 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@freebsd.org using -f Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:36:14 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20120611153614.GA60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD591DF.3060808@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611103221.GU60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD5D7B8.9080504@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611115529.GV60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD5EFE1.30200@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="azskX66S5GHWoEK7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FD5EFE1.30200@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:36:17 -0000 --azskX66S5GHWoEK7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 02:17:21PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 11/06/2012 12:55, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > why because they recommand their user to set PKGNAMEPREFIX to > > ${BLA_PKGNAMEPREFIX} so that their prefix can be set from bsd.port.mk > > Which mean that until the said bsd.$guilty.mk is included UNIQUENAME na= me is set > > to ${PKGNAMEPREFIX}${PORTNAME} with PKGNAMEPREFIX being expanded to not= hing > > and once bsd.$guilty.mk is included ${PKGNAMEPREFIX} expands to somethi= ng and so > > UNIQUENAME is changed. (btw also break the options framework (old and n= ew) with > > the ports because OPTIONSFILE is created using the ${UNIQUENAME} >=20 > A light dawns. Yes. The value of $OPTIONSFILE cannot depend on > anything that happens in the port after bsd.port.options.mk is .include'd. >=20 > How about this (untested): >=20 > % cvs diff > cvs diff: Diffing . > Index: bsd.options.mk > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/Mk/bsd.options.mk,v > retrieving revision 1.13 > diff -u -r1.13 bsd.options.mk > --- bsd.options.mk 6 Jun 2012 11:47:29 -0000 1.13 > +++ bsd.options.mk 11 Jun 2012 13:03:47 -0000 > @@ -8,8 +8,6 @@ > # global ones and ending with the ones decided by the maintainer. > # Options global to the entire ports tree >=20 > -OPTIONSFILE?=3D ${PORT_DBDIR}/${UNIQUENAME}/options > - > #ALL_OPTIONS=3D DOCS \ > # NLS >=20 > Index: bsd.port.mk > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk,v > retrieving revision 1.727 > diff -u -r1.727 bsd.port.mk > --- bsd.port.mk 8 Jun 2012 19:52:39 -0000 1.727 > +++ bsd.port.mk 11 Jun 2012 13:06:35 -0000 > @@ -1268,6 +1268,10 @@ > UNIQUENAME?=3D ${PKGNAMEPREFIX}${PORTNAME} > .endif >=20 > +.if !defined(OPTIONSFILE) > +OPTIONSFILE:=3D ${PORT_DBDIR}/${UNIQUENAME}/options > +.endif > + > .endif >=20 > DOS2UNIX_REGEX?=3D .* >=20 > So OPTIONSFILE is at least independent of any changes to PKGNAMEPREFIX > made by bsd.$guilty.mk? >=20 > Port maintainers wishing to override the default OPTIONSFILE setting > should obviously do that before the inclusion of bsd.port.options.mk >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Matthew >=20 > --=20 > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW >=20 >=20 >=20 This patch does the trick, I'm now running a script with that patch on to discovers all the uniquename names which are not really uniq regards, Bapt --azskX66S5GHWoEK7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/WEG4ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzM7gCaAoMxOuSV3Zxh8mfZFY1NB0na RgwAmwVCwqcYF1p0MrbCNc6IJWxTcGNN =IS91 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --azskX66S5GHWoEK7-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 15:37:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F4C1065675 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:37:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40678FC24; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:37:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BFb7UH015544; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:37:07 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5BFb7uw015543; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:37:07 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@freebsd.org using -f Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:37:04 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20120611153704.GB60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD591DF.3060808@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611103221.GU60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD5D7B8.9080504@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611115529.GV60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD5EFE1.30200@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611153614.GA60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/w6WUUxYkubDgwa5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120611153614.GA60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:37:07 -0000 --/w6WUUxYkubDgwa5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 05:36:14PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 02:17:21PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 11/06/2012 12:55, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > why because they recommand their user to set PKGNAMEPREFIX to > > > ${BLA_PKGNAMEPREFIX} so that their prefix can be set from bsd.port.mk > > > Which mean that until the said bsd.$guilty.mk is included UNIQUENAME = name is set > > > to ${PKGNAMEPREFIX}${PORTNAME} with PKGNAMEPREFIX being expanded to n= othing > > > and once bsd.$guilty.mk is included ${PKGNAMEPREFIX} expands to somet= hing and so > > > UNIQUENAME is changed. (btw also break the options framework (old and= new) with > > > the ports because OPTIONSFILE is created using the ${UNIQUENAME} > >=20 > > A light dawns. Yes. The value of $OPTIONSFILE cannot depend on > > anything that happens in the port after bsd.port.options.mk is .include= 'd. > >=20 > > How about this (untested): > >=20 > > % cvs diff > > cvs diff: Diffing . > > Index: bsd.options.mk > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/Mk/bsd.options.mk,v > > retrieving revision 1.13 > > diff -u -r1.13 bsd.options.mk > > --- bsd.options.mk 6 Jun 2012 11:47:29 -0000 1.13 > > +++ bsd.options.mk 11 Jun 2012 13:03:47 -0000 > > @@ -8,8 +8,6 @@ > > # global ones and ending with the ones decided by the maintainer. > > # Options global to the entire ports tree > >=20 > > -OPTIONSFILE?=3D ${PORT_DBDIR}/${UNIQUENAME}/options > > - > > #ALL_OPTIONS=3D DOCS \ > > # NLS > >=20 > > Index: bsd.port.mk > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk,v > > retrieving revision 1.727 > > diff -u -r1.727 bsd.port.mk > > --- bsd.port.mk 8 Jun 2012 19:52:39 -0000 1.727 > > +++ bsd.port.mk 11 Jun 2012 13:06:35 -0000 > > @@ -1268,6 +1268,10 @@ > > UNIQUENAME?=3D ${PKGNAMEPREFIX}${PORTNAME} > > .endif > >=20 > > +.if !defined(OPTIONSFILE) > > +OPTIONSFILE:=3D ${PORT_DBDIR}/${UNIQUENAME}/options > > +.endif > > + > > .endif > >=20 > > DOS2UNIX_REGEX?=3D .* > >=20 > > So OPTIONSFILE is at least independent of any changes to PKGNAMEPREFIX > > made by bsd.$guilty.mk? > >=20 > > Port maintainers wishing to override the default OPTIONSFILE setting > > should obviously do that before the inclusion of bsd.port.options.mk > >=20 > > Cheers, > >=20 > > Matthew > >=20 > > --=20 > > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > > Flat 3 > > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > > JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 >=20 >=20 > This patch does the trick, I'm now running a script with that patch on to > discovers all the uniquename names which are not really uniq >=20 > regards, > Bapt Here is the patch :) http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/realuniq.diff --/w6WUUxYkubDgwa5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/WEKAACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExRfQCfZUbxLBoTL7KPlETbEdg5ms0J 4AAAoKm9ghKKpxEVlALWplHkMv56ymp6 =vZh1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/w6WUUxYkubDgwa5-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 15:49:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C764B106566C; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:49:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2615C8FC19; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:49:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BFn5Z8042612 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:49:05 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q5BFn5Z8042612 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1339429745; bh=j46cGBOQL8AnW5wQZ0YgaUcs3t/zujHYFEp1lv4zyOg=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Message-ID:Mime-Version; b=FL4iGvHKD69FbP+MJvbufkEGG+fUy1ZmIrteP+XumCnVZnuRW33CD1eNJ5ATeTsOD K2L8qf3s/9xrrcHXpTnAgqfeChZhXE/lCdWSLe0BwJ9i3qiCRbxQ9pkF0EOqOTY/Cj n6i1bQKIWtuj+vpbp1yV/+y6x/xAJ7a97khbbRgU= Message-ID: <4FD6136A.60704@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:48:58 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120601 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD591DF.3060808@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611103221.GU60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD5D7B8.9080504@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611115529.GV60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD5EFE1.30200@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611153614.GA60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120611153704.GB60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20120611153704.GB60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig28348FD19EB0F426AAE83C84" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_ALL,DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:49:09 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig28348FD19EB0F426AAE83C84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/06/2012 16:37, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> This patch does the trick, I'm now running a script with that patch on= to >> > discovers all the uniquename names which are not really uniq >> >=20 >> > regards, >> > Bapt >=20 > Here is the patch :) http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/realuniq.diff Aren't you going to initialise PKGUNIQUENAMESUFFIX anywhere? Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig28348FD19EB0F426AAE83C84 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/WE3EACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxyNwCeP33DGYDLNssvTx/xiLGdb1Ip yq0AnjEpubpndPZ5sCEM354ZNce8pvkh =p3kB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig28348FD19EB0F426AAE83C84-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 15:52:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED747106566B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:52:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: from z.umatar.com (z.umatar.com [66.135.39.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D228FC17 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:52:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from z.umatar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5BFqHkk013568 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:52:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: (from uzimac@localhost) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q5BFqHv5013567 for ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:52:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) X-Authentication-Warning: z.umatar.com: uzimac set sender to uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com using -f From: "Waitman Gobble" To: ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <1339429936.13538@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Originating-IP: 70.90.171.37 X-Mailer: Usermin 1.500 In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:52:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1339429937" Cc: Subject: Re: libpng.so.6 missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:52:18 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1339429937 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Warren Block wrote .. > On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I was reading the handbook about burning DVD's and thought I would check out > K3b as recommended... so I attempted to install from ports. After an hour or so > of the make script building a whole bunch of stuff my patience wore out, and I > bailed. > > > > ports tree csup this morning. > > > > Now it seems many things that were working great will no longer load, it's missing > libpng.so.6 > > > > # SciTE > > Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by "libpangocairo-1.0.so.0" > > Always, yes, always read /usr/ports/UPDATING before updating ports. And > if you've update the ports tree but not updated installed applications > from it, do that first. > > 20120531: > AFFECTS: users of graphics/png > AUTHOR: dinoex@FreeBSD.org > > The PNG library has been updated to version 1.5.10. Please rebuild all > ports that depend on it. > > If you use portmaster: > portmaster -r png- > If you use portupgrade: > portupgrade -fr graphics/png Thanks for the info, I appreciate it. -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA --bound1339429937 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: INLINE _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --bound1339429937-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 16:05:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC89F106566B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:05:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A148F8FC16; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:05:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BG5n8U042723; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:05:49 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5BG5mCa042718; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:05:48 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@freebsd.org using -f Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:05:45 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20120611160545.GC60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD591DF.3060808@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611103221.GU60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD5D7B8.9080504@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611115529.GV60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD5EFE1.30200@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611153614.GA60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120611153704.GB60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD6136A.60704@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Oh6wehMCKJhhoxlo" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FD6136A.60704@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:05:49 -0000 --Oh6wehMCKJhhoxlo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 04:48:58PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 11/06/2012 16:37, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> This patch does the trick, I'm now running a script with that patch on= to > >> > discovers all the uniquename names which are not really uniq > >> >=20 > >> > regards, > >> > Bapt > >=20 > > Here is the patch :) http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/realuniq.diff >=20 > Aren't you going to initialise PKGUNIQUENAMESUFFIX anywhere? >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Matthew >=20 > --=20 > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW >=20 >=20 >=20 No need except ports willing to have a custom PKGNAMEPREFIX but still wante= d to have a custom prefix anyway. like=20 PKGNAMEPREFIX=3D ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX} PKGUNIQUEPREFIX=3D py- which is not mandatory but can help avoiding UNIQUENAME collision regards, Bapt --Oh6wehMCKJhhoxlo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/WF1kACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyylACgqsK6FkY3ks8s6wmtBQpt3Cqx rEAAn12hTWnK+0PWioKOEUbFzyX/fP7O =JdqD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Oh6wehMCKJhhoxlo-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 16:09:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707B51065676; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:09:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2895E8FC1B; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:09:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsd.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.59] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Se7BZ-0004NG-5L; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:09:45 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Se7BZ-0004hH-0S; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:09:45 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BG9iE8006311; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:09:44 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5BG9imj006310; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:09:44 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bris.ac.uk using -f Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:09:44 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: dinoex@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120611160944.GA6284@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Subject: graphics/graphviz X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:09:46 -0000 On r236740M amd64, building graphics/graphiviz: In file included from gv_php_init.c:14: /usr/local/include/php/main/php.h:298: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype /usr/local/bin/swig1.3 -c++ -php5 -o gv_php.cpp ./gv.i CXX libgv_php_la-gv_php.lo gv_php.cpp: In function 'void* SWIG_ZTS_ConvertResourcePtr(zval*, swig_type_info*, int)': gv_php.cpp:935: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'char*' gmake[4]: *** [libgv_php_la-gv_php.lo] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/graphics/graphviz/work/graphviz-2.28.0/tclpkg/gv' gmake[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/graphics/graphviz/work/graphviz-2.28.0/tclpkg/gv' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/graphics/graphviz/work/graphviz-2.28.0/tclpkg' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/graphics/graphviz/work/graphviz-2.28.0' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** [do-build] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/graphviz. *** [build] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/graphviz. # make showconfig ===> The following configuration options are available for graphviz-2.28.0_1: ICONV=on: Build with ICONV support XPM=on: Build with XPM support DIGCOLA=on: DIGCOLA features in neato layout engine IPSEPCOLA=on: IPSEPCOLA features in neato layout engine NLS=on: Build with gettext support TK=off: Build with TK support PANGOCAIRO=off: build with pangocairo support RSVG=off: build with rsvg library GTK=off: build with gtk plugin GDK_PIXBUF=off: build with gdk pixbuf support GNOMEUI=off: build with libgnomeui support SMYRNA=off: SMYRNA large graph viewer (GTK is required) GVEDIT=off: gvedit (qt is required) MING=off: Build with ming plugin DEVIL=off: Build with devil plugin GHOSTSCRIPT=off: Build with ghostscript plugin PERL=on: Perl bindings (swig) PHP=on: PHP bindings (swig) PYTHON=on: Python bindings (swig) RUBY=on: Ruby bindings (swig) LUA=on: Lua bindings (swig) TCL=on: TCL bindings (swig) GUILE=on: Guile bindings (swig) ===> Use 'make config' to modify these settings # With the default config (no swig), port builds fine. -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 16:12:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054DA1065676; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:12:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF2C8FC12; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BGCnl7031503 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:12:49 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q5BGCnl7031503 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1339431170; bh=dK3qnk1QJLhh7DIoCppXxgzQ+DxW6XSpHAZ948rDMYc=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Message-ID:Mime-Version; b=QjSNuD0KC/s2qZGDbLBZeSU3/53We4SpeMoHnqjj8u14TO/3iJPzVvcvaWqtEhGC6 dhxmBTJH1iIxk8/Xb1tHtzBKCxG18a7smIcFseCsYi+rKvzL9eDNLqyVj2O+YJoy8A JUsQabsi8GG2EQrQVcTSjnwVMggStGccKTkoOhQ0= Message-ID: <4FD61901.3010503@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:12:49 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120601 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD591DF.3060808@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611103221.GU60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD5D7B8.9080504@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611115529.GV60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD5EFE1.30200@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611153614.GA60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120611153704.GB60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD6136A.60704@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611160545.GC60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20120611160545.GC60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig01E6E61A30564A671BFE1F32" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_ALL,DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:12:54 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig01E6E61A30564A671BFE1F32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/06/2012 17:05, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 04:48:58PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 11/06/2012 16:37, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>>> This patch does the trick, I'm now running a script with that patch = on to >>>>> discovers all the uniquename names which are not really uniq >>>>> >>>>> regards, >>>>> Bapt >>> >>> Here is the patch :) http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/realuniq.diff >> >> Aren't you going to initialise PKGUNIQUENAMESUFFIX anywhere? > No need except ports willing to have a custom PKGNAMEPREFIX but still w= anted to > have a custom prefix anyway. >=20 > like=20 > PKGNAMEPREFIX=3D ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX} > PKGUNIQUEPREFIX=3D py- >=20 > which is not mandatory but can help avoiding UNIQUENAME collision Not PREFIX --- SUFFIX. You have: UNIQUENAME?=3D ${PKGUNIQUENAMEPREFIX}${PORTNAME}${PKGUNIQUENAMESUFFIX} ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ or is this part of some cunning plan to do with sub-ports? Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig01E6E61A30564A671BFE1F32 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/WGQEACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyrrgCffIxSXZfHkjN9z3Car/nGTLcM tKUAn1fbjqCvKeilzj0cOD5oM5gMnBIa =Kux+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig01E6E61A30564A671BFE1F32-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 16:22:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878971065675 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:22:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sunner.semmy.ru (sunner.semmy.ru [IPv6:2a00:14d0:0:20::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CDA8FC1A for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:22:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [46.242.19.18] (helo=[172.16.100.20]) by sunner.semmy.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Se7O2-000OXn-Ev for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:22:38 +0400 Message-ID: <4FD61B4E.9060906@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:22:38 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4FD5EE43.3050308@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <4FD5EE43.3050308@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portupgrade omniORB X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:22:40 -0000 11.06.2012 17:10, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > It looks like I cannot portupgrade omniORB. > Solution is to deinstall and reinstall, but I thought I'd report this. > Thanks. I'll take a look. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 18:29:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62C01065673; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:29:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09FFC8FC1A; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so4747527bkv.13 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:29:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q85On9lc4DyYvfOC4Xy+Pmja2FHDmalRsgeacbObOF0=; b=a090vubbMviiTdY9poa3zGSWXqrLDvX+HFSXbkAlJCUdRhRxAyytOjPQBdi1qbECTx z8b7nL5LoIZsaYNC5Uq0/0IpOSC31/IVaw6zbRmPukHzt9YqX8TMAsCTmKByGaI027fv WmFXnJroJH10EvIaKr255iEQLT+t8dkxsaPOna8kUgClzPFXygzHRO1A481ua1AOGaoJ m97FtZFlEr5DxA8asKadYGao5+rwh4Yym3RMwRgcihRmd1oEZX0HTdSx46TGESJmh/jH 4tUAa6ejwXm0BEGdVqMtHX56ao1ojqzxL4X2r7MUxWXvuqTbFBbsvXFOTwot42eVjvwy ollA== Received: by 10.204.156.69 with SMTP id v5mr10467375bkw.133.1339439359915; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:29:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.171.138 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:28:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FD5A4D4.1080707@dssgmbh.de> References: <4FD1A691.8010300@dssgmbh.de> <4FD23FC4.5070609@FreeBSD.org> <4FD5A4D4.1080707@dssgmbh.de> From: Chris Rees Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:28:47 +0100 Message-ID: To: Alfred Bartsch , Martin Wilke Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: "make index" shows missing port directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:29:21 -0000 On 11 June 2012 08:57, Alfred Bartsch wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Am 08.06.2012 22:23, schrieb Chris Rees: >> On Jun 8, 2012 7:10 PM, "Palle Girgensohn" >> wrote: >>> >>> Chris Rees skrev: >>>> On 8 June 2012 08:15, Alfred Bartsch >>>> wrote: >>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>> ... >>>>> Adding this missing entry to the portstree should solve this >>>>> issue. To avoid such problems in the future, it would IMHO be >>>>> preferable to have only one port >>>>> (/usr/ports/databases/p5-DBD-mysql), which is able to handle >>>>> all mysql versions, similar to p5-DBD-Pg. >>>> >>>> Actually, I'm looking at moving p5-DBD-Pg to versioned ports, >>>> since it is less unpredictable to install a versioned port, the >>>> autodetection logic is messy and packages are not built for any >>>> but the default version. >>>> >>>> Chris >>> >>> That is partly true, but it is also strange to have a versioned >>> port where there is no difference other than the dependency? >>> >> >> Oops, haha, I remember looking at it and also thinking what you >> just said. =A0Sorry for the noise. >> >> Alfred, there actually is a port databases/p5-DBD-mysql which is >> the only one that ports should depend on (I had this conversation >> with Alex Dupre IIRC, the maintainer of mysql). >> >> I'll do a quick scan for ports depending on the versioned ports and >> get PRs in. >> >> Chris > > Thank you for taking care of this. I really would appreciate to have > only one port as a BDB - MySQL interface. > > There is another issue with make index: > > Generating INDEX-8 - please wait.. > ... > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: jpeg2ps-a4-1.9_2 > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: openldap-sasl-client-2.4.31_1 > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: a2ps-a4-4.13b_4 > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: c2ps-a4-4.0_1 > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: enscript-a4-1.6.4_5 > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: html2ps-a4-1.0.b7,1 > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: lprps-a4-2.5 > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: mp-a4-3.0.1 > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: psutils-a4-1.17_2 > =A0Done. > > Related settings in /etc/make.conf: > > A4=3Dyes > PAPERSIZE=3Da4 > > The index entries for the "-letter" ports are missing afterwards. > IMHO this primarily happens because the "-letter" (slave-) ports are > used as master ports for the "-a4" ports. > > Are these different ports related to paper format really needed > anymore - in times of libpaper? > > If yes, I would vote for cleaning the ports tree: > - - define "real" master ports (e.g. print/enscript, print/a2ps) > - - change the -letter ports to "real" slave ports > - - change the MASTERDIR entries in "-a4" and "-letterdj" ports > - - take care that PKGNAMESUFFIX is set in the slave ports only > > BTW: There is a tool named p5-FreeBSD-Portindex written by Matthew > Seaman, which creates a complete index file (=3Dcontaining every port > directory), not showing these weaknesses. > > The openldap duplicate entry results of setting port option "SASL". > There is another issue with this port: > The package origin is stored as net/openldap24-client even with option > "SASL" set. This port is a dependancy of some kde ports. Every time > I'm rebuilding one of these ports, portmaster tries to build > openldap24-sasl-client, even if it is already installed. > Manually changing the ORIGIN entry in /var/db/pkg solved this issue > for me. You have stumbled upon a known problem. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/162088 I'm not quite sure I agree with the closure however, since a solution is not made, rather a workaround. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 19:03:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9748A1065670; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:03:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D6F8FC0C; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:03:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BJ3gj0084300; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:03:42 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q5BJ3eMd084297; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:03:40 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:03:40 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201206020012.q520CEcf057568@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120602004230.GA14487@in-addr.com> <201206040224.q542OBqk085897@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604043233.GB32597@lonesome.com> <201206040841.q548fVHa091169@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <201206041841.q54IfUow001060@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604191343.GF10783@isuckatdomains.isuckatdomains.net> <201206041932.q54JWONA001600@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FCDA15C.2000700@digsys.bg> <201206061859.q56IxvLx045828@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FCFC846.5050508@FreeBSD.org> <201206070527.q575R1sX052893@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FD37B40.2030500@FreeBSD.org> <4FD3F149.10602@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-902635197-1832517-1339441422=:84255" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:03:42 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Dave Hayes , FreeBSD ports list Subject: Re: Documenting 'make config' options X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:03:49 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---902635197-1832517-1339441422=:84255 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, Warren Block wrote: >>> That's a nice idea, how do you make it work with dialog? >> >> No idea, this is still the design phase. :) Actually, a message I now >> can't find suggested that dialog may be able to do it unchanged. > > Followup: > > dialog --item-help \ > --checklist "Contrived options description example" 21 70 15 \ > "ABC" "Enable ABC encapsulation of convoluted insoluble ..." "on" \ > "variations when the complementary quantum reversal feature is undesirable" \ > "DOCS" "Build and install documentation" "on" "" \ > "XYZ" "Enabling XYZ sets compiler go-fast stripes, defeats ...," "off" \ > "all safeguards, and begins a wholesale, awesome, breathtaking data mangling" \ > "NLS" "Native Language Support via gettext utilities" "on" "" Here is a patch to do it. To use, apply patch. Pick a port and edit the option descriptions to be longer than 49 characters. Then run 'make config'. Notes: This patch only does descriptions for the plain options right now. Changes to the multi and single options would be the same thing. (Not done because I'm hoping someone better at make(1) will have cleaner methods.) There's a cosmetic problem. The last description line at the bottom of the screen remains after dialog exits. I have not found a way to clear it in dialog. ---902635197-1832517-1339441422=:84255 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name=patch-bsd.port.mk-helpline.diff Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=patch-bsd.port.mk-helpline.diff LS0tIGJzZC5wb3J0Lm1rLm9yaWcJMjAxMi0wNi0xMSAwODo1Mzo0My4wMDAw MDAwMDAgLTA2MDANCisrKyBic2QucG9ydC5tawkyMDEyLTA2LTExIDEyOjUw OjA4LjAwMDAwMDAwMCAtMDYwMA0KQEAgLTYwMTcsMTEgKzYwMTcsMTQgQEAN CiAuaWYgIXRhcmdldChwcmUtY29uZmlnKQ0KIHByZS1jb25maWc6DQogX0NP TVBMRVRFX09QVElPTlNfTElTVDo9CSR7QUxMX09QVElPTlN9DQorVklTX1dJ RFRIPQk0OQ0KIC5mb3Igb3B0IGluICR7QUxMX09QVElPTlN9DQorJHtvcHR9 X0ZJUlNUIT0JJHtFQ0hPfSAkeyR7b3B0fV9ERVNDOlF9IHwgJHtBV0t9IC1G PSJcMDA0IiAneyBPUlM9IiI7IHByaW50IHN1YnN0cigkJDAsMSwke1ZJU19X SURUSH0pOyBpZiAobGVuZ3RoKCQxKT4ke1ZJU19XSURUSH0pe3ByaW50ICIr In0gfScNCiske29wdH1fUkVTVCE9CSR7RUNIT30gJHske29wdH1fREVTQzpR fSB8ICR7QVdLfSAtRj0iXDAwNCIgJ3sgcHJpbnQgc3Vic3RyKCQkMCwke1ZJ U19XSURUSH0rMSkgfScNCiAuICBpZiBlbXB0eShQT1JUX09QVElPTlM6TSR7 b3B0fSkNCi1ERUZPUFRJT05TKz0JJHtvcHR9ICIiJHske29wdH1fREVTQzpR fSBvZmYNCitERUZPUFRJT05TKz0JJHtvcHR9ICIiJHske29wdH1fRklSU1Q6 UX0gb2ZmICIiJHske29wdH1fUkVTVDpRfQ0KIC4gIGVsc2UNCi1ERUZPUFRJ T05TKz0JJHtvcHR9ICIiJHske29wdH1fREVTQzpRfSBvbg0KK0RFRk9QVElP TlMrPQkke29wdH0gIiIkeyR7b3B0fV9GSVJTVDpRfSBvbiAiIiR7JHtvcHR9 X1JFU1Q6UX0NCiAuICBlbmRpZg0KIC5lbmRmb3INCiAuZm9yIG11bHRpIGlu ICR7T1BUSU9OU19NVUxUSX0NCkBAIC02MDY5LDcgKzYwNzIsNyBAQA0KIC5l bmRpZg0KIAlAVE1QT1BUSU9OU0ZJTEU9JCQobWt0ZW1wIC10IHBvcnRvcHRp b25zKTsgXA0KIAl0cmFwICIke1JNfSAtZiAkJHtUTVBPUFRJT05TRklMRX07 IGV4aXQgMSIgMSAyIDMgNSAxMCAxMyAxNTsgXA0KLQkke0RJQUxPR30gLS1j aGVja2xpc3QgIk9wdGlvbnMgZm9yICR7UEtHTkFNRTpDLy0oW14tXSspJC8g XDEvfSIgMjEgNzAgMTUgJHtERUZPUFRJT05TfSAyPiAkJHtUTVBPUFRJT05T RklMRX0gfHwgeyBcDQorCSR7RElBTE9HfSAtLWl0ZW0taGVscCAtLWNoZWNr bGlzdCAiT3B0aW9ucyBmb3IgJHtQS0dOQU1FOkMvLShbXi1dKykkLyBcMS99 IiAyMSA3MCAxNSAke0RFRk9QVElPTlN9IDI+ICQke1RNUE9QVElPTlNGSUxF fSB8fCB7IFwNCiAJCSR7Uk19IC1mICQke1RNUE9QVElPTlNGSUxFfTsgXA0K IAkJJHtFQ0hPX01TR30gIj09PT4gT3B0aW9ucyB1bmNoYW5nZWQiOyBcDQog CQlleGl0IDA7IFwNCg== ---902635197-1832517-1339441422=:84255-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 19:20:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00471065672; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:20:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC228FC1A; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:20:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BJK4o6084397; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:20:04 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q5BJK4Jt084394; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:20:04 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:20:04 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201206020012.q520CEcf057568@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120602004230.GA14487@in-addr.com> <201206040224.q542OBqk085897@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604043233.GB32597@lonesome.com> <201206040841.q548fVHa091169@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <201206041841.q54IfUow001060@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604191343.GF10783@isuckatdomains.isuckatdomains.net> <201206041932.q54JWONA001600@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FCDA15C.2000700@digsys.bg> <201206061859.q56IxvLx045828@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FCFC846.5050508@FreeBSD.org> <201206070527.q575R1sX052893@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FD37B40.2030500@FreeBSD.org> <4FD3F149.10602@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII; FORMAT=flowed Content-ID: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:20:04 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Dave Hayes , FreeBSD ports list Subject: Re: Documenting 'make config' options X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:20:05 -0000 On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Warren Block wrote: > Here is a patch to do it. > > To use, apply patch. Pick a port and edit the option descriptions to be > longer than 49 characters. Then run 'make config'. > > Notes: > > This patch only does descriptions for the plain options right now. Changes to > the multi and single options would be the same thing. (Not done because I'm > hoping someone better at make(1) will have cleaner > methods.) > > There's a cosmetic problem. The last description line at the bottom of the > screen remains after dialog exits. I have not found a way to clear it in > dialog. And another note: VIS_WIDTH is set to 49 because that is the size available for a description on a standard 80x24 terminal (less one column for a "+" indicator). But it can be dynamically determined with dialog --print-maxsize. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 19:44:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95654106566B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:44:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryan@shatow.net) Received: from secure.xzibition.com (secure.xzibition.com [173.160.118.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C75A8FC08 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:44:04 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=shatow.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type; q=dns; s=sweb; b=kpcWyv8t404gzTFfyCcYFAOjgJwjVDSA 0uMsDgtyeOZ68YlkwRntMrYXWNR425nUsyB2vF4DGiEfodDcCZLejy++G8jt9A4B kIRVh2nQl11LDRkMXtTwPgBxLyik8/y2ivRomLX3Ua745yM/NNhD4ItIs+giHrPk MjfoxMEu+w8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=shatow.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type; s=sweb; bh=SyMjrVZKZ842RwVfb5uRQZ97LPU3wwvaOCm+g/ QiBqA=; b=a9cD15xoH/1iVaJueYqEX89UFSvAGoLe+HcwMUbrMKyp06P6N4g55D PpHGLvhHd9pkeZLWN1oiCWixDIrbsR1qjIxcCJMMz4RGxQIjDVVolXIkBJr0ARMa CSHTFoDD4XM15v7GFFsQO/jv8sJCXpSOfqZ1lFHwPCxKLgNnSQXVc= Received: (qmail 61240 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2012 14:44:01 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.74?) (bryan@shatow.net@74.94.87.209) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 11 Jun 2012 14:44:01 -0500 Message-ID: <4FD64A84.4070203@shatow.net> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:44:04 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block References: <201206020012.q520CEcf057568@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120602004230.GA14487@in-addr.com> <201206040224.q542OBqk085897@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604043233.GB32597@lonesome.com> <201206040841.q548fVHa091169@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <201206041841.q54IfUow001060@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604191343.GF10783@isuckatdomains.isuckatdomains.net> <201206041932.q54JWONA001600@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FCDA15C.2000700@digsys.bg> <201206061859.q56IxvLx045828@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FCFC846.5050508@FreeBSD.org> <201206070527.q575R1sX052893@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <4FD37B40.2030500@FreeBSD.org> <4FD3F149.10602@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA1E74684E9D1822545371D2B" Cc: Dave Hayes , Doug Barton , FreeBSD ports list Subject: Re: Documenting 'make config' options X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:44:04 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA1E74684E9D1822545371D2B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 6/11/2012 2:03 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, Warren Block wrote: >=20 >>>> That's a nice idea, how do you make it work with dialog? >>> >>> No idea, this is still the design phase. :) Actually, a message I >>> now can't find suggested that dialog may be able to do it unchanged. >> >> Followup: >> >> dialog --item-help \ >> --checklist "Contrived options description example" 21 70 15 \ >> "ABC" "Enable ABC encapsulation of convoluted insoluble ..." "on" = \ >> "variations when the complementary quantum reversal feature is >> undesirable" \ >> "DOCS" "Build and install documentation" "on" "" \ >> "XYZ" "Enabling XYZ sets compiler go-fast stripes, defeats ...," "off= " \ >> "all safeguards, and begins a wholesale, awesome, breathtaking data >> mangling" \ >> "NLS" "Native Language Support via gettext utilities" "on" "" >=20 > Here is a patch to do it. >=20 > To use, apply patch. Pick a port and edit the option descriptions to b= e > longer than 49 characters. Then run 'make config'. >=20 > Notes: >=20 > This patch only does descriptions for the plain options right now. > Changes to the multi and single options would be the same thing. (Not > done because I'm hoping someone better at make(1) will have cleaner > methods.) >=20 > There's a cosmetic problem. The last description line at the bottom of= > the screen remains after dialog exits. I have not found a way to clear= > it in dialog. >=20 Cool idea. FYI --item-help is not supported on 8.3 and earlier so a OSVERSION check is probably needed. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --------------enigA1E74684E9D1822545371D2B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJP1kqIAAoJEG54KsA8mwz5GkQP+QHXCiFhxynzOPhlxVmu/gs8 Cw3VbQo9E5TL4O989oqCVzcUOJ7TaRfYBDSCS8IG1i4wfRLuxzvLk/Xa3TDOt+Cg P+Z/qLuxRUk1fM833i0Pz2tryk0nwMADIbasqLeGESUWLAX363ob7Xb2v9O95BeO q1jSWM18ORAhzQRYkNQhnlpoAEJQY8YFrqbELSmA90z0VdNKQHi/r3bEAEOJX+Gi AXk6F+tszDb3ZotsrrRMd4Bx2sHDvYvCyshsXNlyAOagBX4Ei/OtHLzI5zExJcv7 WOa4Wq7pRF4J/GEepmbhL1XAT5TqCTkE7PQzjVWgPpgk3WyvoqwQVIBaQbhZPAXp gK7MroumC2+yRBj7aaKdC34RgkW4U/CpW0uFc7HsD4uaGzwyqDwEEJXrc7z8Elpc +dwBVfRA+/FXnPIUgGPFUySwGZCSS/8LnJyP4c7fKr50gciCrt1m+dVDeCwDIsvD AHBSni69+9vJBP4qUzAhN10vgFfNp208Xy0t60D7IwOdT/ghXgRt3i9hbItrZhn8 3JtXCGVclh16RfseacjBK8i2WCMFOwmIv/AJ3sUiw/JFdB7NhvAW3QmOZaYp05Am 6xYWs7sohXd8wevPU6WtFtVAw3y7Ws1Qestk1FV/VL8QRZ/9fR3EtPwWPF98Xusv 9ZMk3d65sLd0mJSVJsWp =JrUm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA1E74684E9D1822545371D2B-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 19:52:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BAC4106567B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john.marshall@riverwillow.com.au) Received: from mail1.riverwillow.net.au (mail1.riverwillow.net.au [203.58.93.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B132E8FC0A for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.25.24.200] (rwpc13.mby.riverwillow.net.au [172.25.24.200]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail1.riverwillow.net.au (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BJq1bN097709 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 05:52:01 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=riverwillow.com.au; s=m1001; t=1339444321; bh=OD+MDJH73Zz183drGbOAd86xVpcQ6x/XXwugza2O4kU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=VowV3CpW4vsDKbRPYxC3nR8d2yWwI99ZZrEFl98LL8K5g02BmIuhZahscbhUHnUiz 1JvzFDGYMp5Xe0F075DYPNyEGZotHTVnb1rIhdHEnwwKWCxcSL5IpZtsWh1ONtopk5 2hLQbyfpMimnz0M2Bog0iF/m7M1nzPAEz022LPF8= Message-ID: <4FD64C51.7040807@riverwillow.com.au> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 05:51:45 +1000 From: John Marshall Organization: Riverwillow Pty Ltd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120610 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20120602035757.GB4052@rwpc13.mby.riverwillow.net.au> <20120602095554.GU85232@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20120602095554.GU85232@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=A29A84A2; url=http://pki.riverwillow.com.au/pgp/johnmarshall.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig52123E6AD9F6A3B6034F3A98" Subject: Re: OPTIONS framework unwell? Additional ports installed unexpectedly X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:52:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig52123E6AD9F6A3B6034F3A98 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/06/2012 19:55, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 01:57:58PM +1000, John Marshall wrote: >> I just had a whole bunch of ports install unexpectedly. >> >> portmaster -D -r png-1.4.11 >> >> One of the ports that pulled in for rebuilding was graphics/php5-gd. >> That's fair enough, and it is depended on by lang/php5-extensions, so >> that got pulled in too. That's fine, but then php5-extensions pulled = in >> all of the other "default" extensions to *install* - all of the ones a= >> have deselected in my config. >> >> =3D=3D=3D>>> Done updating ports that depend on png-1.4.11=20 >> >> =3D=3D=3D>>> The following actions were performed: >> Upgrade of png-1.4.11 to png-1.5.10 >> Upgrade of gd-2.0.35_7,1 to gd-2.0.35_8,1 >> Upgrade of p5-GD-2.46 to p5-GD-2.46_1 >> Installation of archivers/php5-phar (php5-phar-5.4.3) >> Installation of databases/php5-pdo_sqlite (php5-pdo_sqlite-5.4.3) >> Installation of databases/php5-sqlite3 (php5-sqlite3-5.4.3) >> Installation of devel/php5-json (php5-json-5.4.3) >> Installation of devel/php5-tokenizer (php5-tokenizer-5.4.3) >> Re-installation of php5-gd-5.4.3 >> Installation of security/php5-filter (php5-filter-5.4.3) >> Installation of sysutils/php5-posix (php5-posix-5.4.3) >> Installation of textproc/php5-simplexml (php5-simplexml-5.4.3) >> Installation of textproc/php5-xmlreader (php5-xmlreader-5.4.3) >> Installation of textproc/php5-xmlwriter (php5-xmlwriter-5.4.3) >> Re-installation of php5-extensions-1.7 >> Upgrade of rrdtool-1.2.30_1 to rrdtool-1.2.30_2 >> Upgrade of webalizer-geoip-2.23.5 to webalizer-geoip-2.23.5_1 >> >> So, what happened? Those extensions OPTIONS are all disabled in my >> config. (details were shown in OP) > Thanks for reporting, apparently there might be a bug in the code that > regenerate the WITH_/WITHOUT_ stuff needed by the old options stuff. I got frustrated with this and changed lang/php5-extensions/Makefile to use the new options. That avoids the problem and works for me. See: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/168946 --=20 John Marshall --------------enig52123E6AD9F6A3B6034F3A98 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/WTGEACgkQw/tAaKKahKKWswCgkB21eGGea1LDwlKwNoRGAKqd MH8AoKLWwaGPNWF5XpzIjHdV0YP3odae =zWJs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig52123E6AD9F6A3B6034F3A98-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 21:00:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7CF106566B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:00:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438C48FC0C for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id AAA01905; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:00:23 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1SeBip-0003qe-21; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:00:23 +0300 Message-ID: <4FD65C64.3080001@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:00:20 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120503 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mikhail T." X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=X-VIET-VPS Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: graphics/libfpx: use of bsd.lib.mk and warnings X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:00:35 -0000 [Cc-ing mailing list just in case it is useful for other port maintainers] Mikhail, I see that graphics/libfpx uses a custom FreeBSD-specific makefile which makes use of bsd.lib.mk and sets WARNS to 3. I think that this is an unsustainable approach. First, the external libraries are not under our control and may adhere to some different policy with respect to warnings. Second, different compilers (gccXY, clang) may be used to compile ports and they may produce new warnings-come-errors. Right now, this is an issue for me with gcc46 as a ports compiler. I think that the best solution here is NO_WERROR. What do you and other port guys think about this? -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 22:20:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9031065672; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:20:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAE48FC14; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id BAA02679; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 01:20:45 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1SeCya-0003x6-QR; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 01:20:44 +0300 Message-ID: <4FD66F3B.7070306@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 01:20:43 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120503 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports , kde@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=X-VIET-VPS Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: graphics/djview4: QMAKESPEC override? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:20:47 -0000 Writing to both a formal maintainer and a more realistic maintainer. graphics/djview4 Makefile has this: .if defined(CXX) && ${CXX:M*icc} QMAKESPEC?= freebsd-icc .else QMAKESPEC?= freebsd-g++ .endif This snippet is before bsd.port.pre.mk inclusion. Thus, it overrides the logic for QMAKESPEC selection in bsd.qt.mk for no apparent good reason. Removing it doesn't break anything and fixes compilation with gcc46 too. P.S. Does anyone actually uses icc on FreeBSD to build ports? I doubt that very much. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 22:45:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502D71065670; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:45:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D068FC08; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ip-109-84-112-234.web.vodafone.de (ip-109-84-112-234.web.vodafone.de [109.84.112.234]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 456D83F421; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:45:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:45:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Doug Barton , Baptiste Daroussin In-Reply-To: <20120610175859.GN60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> Message-ID: References: <4FD4140F.4010209@FreeBSD.org> <20120610175859.GN60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Chris Rees , Heino Tiedemann , rotkap@gmx.de, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: firefox 13.0,1 needs lang/gcc46 -- to RUN?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:45:31 -0000 On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, Doug Barton wrote: > In an ideal world, we would have separate packages for the runtime libs > and the build tools so that packages could be more portable, but I would > imagine that would be a lot of work. I looked into that last year and found that the FreeBSD ports infrastructure was not exactly helpful. Ideally I would want something like gcc46-runtime and gcc46-java and gcc46 itself, where -runtime is a hard dependency for gcc46 and -java optional. Short of building lang/gcc46 a couple of times via slave ports and packaging different aspects by virtue of different slave ports, or having gcc46 also include the contents of gcc46-runtime, the introduction of a gcc46-DONT-USE-JUST-USED-FOR-SUBPACKAGES dummy port was the only idea I came up with. None of the three approaches really convinced me. On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Yes that would be a lot of but it is the way we are doing. the upcoming > stagedir will open the door to easy package splitting and then allow > easily to split gcc into something like gcc-libs and gcc package or > something like that. Lovely. Looking forward to that! (Chris also indicated he had an idea, let's see. Whatever works. ;-) Gerald From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 23:19:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBBE11065672 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:19:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE3D8FC14 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:19:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so3424587yhg.13 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:19:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:organization:x-mailer:face :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=d2EOj9OgQuj08q1VBicvJsUGNNdXz7/M4YhjFRV6ufg=; b=RQd3PSyfkVN9LDs8KepaBJRLeqAn/U9DaG5CYTASNV8uk8DTxHHr4+AntDWDBS1kic 58ajePQ/SeIJ2nOs9C63BY5XEi9qmBTwmP2Pm8I1bC+/rwAUyJ35kDxVyxohXBCxo0Ce 0Ew8OYoEWEuI8Bl7IEmhiz5KJFplp+rEEjcPQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:organization:x-mailer:face :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=d2EOj9OgQuj08q1VBicvJsUGNNdXz7/M4YhjFRV6ufg=; b=Ii/n5dxsGvB3WLx+5qnDbte6CpOYYmE1HaFSHKBQH/xQ+SubK2hTpp7Y+9VqBKYroc 16k/22YaSY2rgCnTAdXvhB7elbKFWGPVwxqL42rqMbppKNRAoVctN0qFkakJDOMynO4p FjsQsPxn9TxawlxLr8YRyFSjB9ZZDESvxWlMn8t9Rax/ANGEUmPSptA2u8ZkiOzn7khQ SwQBjCZjefKQZW11xo0g5fcWP4x4MgNyEGX6dYHpG1S/wP1r6FRDvjCSfvtXQRyFMhtK 3ovbfPtcSnmAWskJA1s0XFoEZRXy7JYEqZtSV1YJtRgnG+XcFueNCIy74ygyY9/FViYr kceA== Received: by 10.236.155.6 with SMTP id i6mr24122477yhk.11.1339456785811; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:19:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r45sm60729620yhg.18.2012.06.11.16.19.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:19:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3WB9DG6F8wz2CG46 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:19:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:19:42 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120611191942.1bcceb31@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlVSsvdQUKVM7ubMux4HKkd3H9rIJ+QABhs86IXBu+RH/zXuu3kiZ5Vk13ZFFAtYf5saf+Q Subject: "pkg_version -vIL=" outputs several "succeeds index entries." X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:19:46 -0000 {The author of this post has been Chad Perrin approved} I just ran "portsnap" followed by "pkg_version -vIL=" and received this output. Somehow this just doesn't look kosher. bn-freebsd-doc-20120506 > succeeds index (index has 39016) da-freebsd-doc-20120506 > succeeds index (index has 39016) de-freebsd-doc-20120506 > succeeds index (index has 39016) el-freebsd-doc-20120506 > succeeds index (index has 39016) en-freebsd-doc-20120506 > succeeds index (index has 39016) es-freebsd-doc-20120506 > succeeds index (index has 39016) fr-freebsd-doc-20120506 > succeeds index (index has 39016) hu-freebsd-doc-20120506 > succeeds index (index has 39016) it-freebsd-doc-20120506 > succeeds index (index has 39016) ja-freebsd-doc-20120506 > succeeds index (index has 39016) mn-freebsd-doc-20120506 > succeeds index (index has 39016) nl-freebsd-doc-20120506 > succeeds index (index has 39016) pl-freebsd-doc-20120506 > succeeds index (index has 39016) pt-freebsd-doc-20120506 > succeeds index (index has 39016) ru-freebsd-doc-20120506 > succeeds index (index has 39016) sr-freebsd-doc-20120506 > succeeds index (index has 39016) tr-freebsd-doc-20120506 > succeeds index (index has 39016) zh_cn-freebsd-doc-20120506 > succeeds index (index has 39016) zh_tw-freebsd-doc-20120506 > succeeds index (index has 39016) -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 23:51:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D108106566B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:51:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FA78FC12 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so3124851vbm.13 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:51:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EJxbhPn1z//dtVes/nVhAgUCyxirFoRKfy2lOfb5MCc=; b=D7JFox0Dwg1xO+zU9v04V3Sk6H3MxM1fkYHlw3tohb3wYwqgrukO4/NNDd1ttTpbwv 7VwhoEtElwrO5rxM531z+fUY+LFDhCaduhZXgW9z/bjUPAL70fQITHJ9nsDLvV6XUZms DCDev46lxZUHjiHL3DcJJ21KVbbaQQ7pXkkTlMm6U0G/BlUyZb3dt8ZWGLB/6MlP46uc y++WVi4PYVPsgHtFYB6nQVCKoo+xSRMXXqUow9zFhRjh2bE1ZhTEySx6ZqX7qgiIccwE c+JN2Hmvp4WsafKxMzDh1F1ZjsChDgKoghXQMRVScchkpKREXTR+wIA36c95+ZxuwBh9 0CEg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.22.38 with SMTP id a6mr11413867vdf.37.1339458676460; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:51:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.113.97 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:51:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4FD585AC.1050906@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:51:16 -0400 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: port unmaintained since 2005? drop it? misc/gpt* X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:51:17 -0000 On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:33 AM, b. f. wrote: > On 6/11/12, Michael Scheidell wrote: >> >> >> On 6/10/12 11:14 PM, b. f. wrote: >>> The distribution files are at: >>> >>> ftp://ftp.ncsa.uiuc.edu/aces/gpt/releases >>> >>> and the homepage is: >>> >>> http://grid.ncsa.illinois.edu/gpt/ >>> >>> (And Globus is at: >>> >>> http://www.globus.org/toolkit/ =A0 =A0) >>> >>> Time to determine this:< =A01 min. >>> >>> b. >> glad to know you are volunteering to maintain these ports. >> I will resurrect globus from the archives (where it has been since 2008, >> see /usr/ports/MOVED), >> which email address do you want in the MAINTAINER=3D line? >> > > Heh, not so fast. =A0I've got other things to do first. =A0I was just > pointing out that it is not so hard to correct some of the stale > information, and it is useful to do this as a pointer to those who may > wish to more actively maintain the port later, even if it is moved to > the attic in a few months. > > I should add that globus comes with a bundled version of gpt, and I > think the Debian port is based upon this -- it's at 3.6.x. =A0Also, that > brooks@, who was involved in adding this port and other related > software, could probably tell you more about grid software. Well, there may be some users coming out of the woodwork for this port. I noticed the following vulnerability alert today: CVE-2012-3292 http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=3DCVE-2012-3292 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 00:38:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB98106566C; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:38:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156388FC14; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:38:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5C0cLGR085698; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:38:21 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q5C0cK6B085695; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:38:21 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:38:20 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Mel Flynn In-Reply-To: <4FBFF63D.7010404@acsalaska.net> Message-ID: References: <4F578AA7.4060008@FreeBSD.org> <4F990D9A.3090100@FreeBSD.org> <4FA643FA.3050206@FreeBSD.org> <4FAB6E01.50108@FreeBSD.org> <4FAC2EC1.8040708@FreeBSD.org> <20120517014743.GB5348@lonesome.com> <4FBFF63D.7010404@acsalaska.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:38:21 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Chris Rees , Mark Linimon , Scot Hetzel , Andriy Gapon , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UID/GID_OFFSET (Was: Re: WITH_GCC) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:38:25 -0000 On Fri, 25 May 2012, Mel Flynn wrote: > On 20-5-2012 14:06, Chris Rees wrote: > >> Usually. Sometimes it's (ab)used to include the relevant bsd.*.mk >> file without adding dependencies (WANT_GNOME), but normally that's >> what WANT_ is used for. >> >> Definitely add a warning that if you want to use a WANT_ variable you >> should also check the relevant Mk/ files to check for syntax. > > What's also not consistent is the use of: > USE_FOO= 42+ > which is shorthand for: > USE_FOO= yes > WANT_FOO_VER= 42+ > > Anyway, since Warren is on the job, on one of my travels through pmk, I > turned a corner and met these totally awesome user settable variables: > UID_OFFSET > GID_OFFSET > > No docs on them in pmk itself or share/examples/etc/make.conf. What they > do is add the specified number to the UID and GID that a port defines by > using /usr/ports/{UIDS,GIDS}. This is extremely useful if you are using > multiple jails on one machine and don't want the uid's to clash (shared > memory for example). > It's also useful, if you have different providers for uid/gid > information through the use of NSS modules. Knowing that ports won't > ever get into your "module range" makes you sleep better. > Example in /etc/make.conf > UID_OFFSET= 20000 > GID_OFFSET= ${UID_OFFSET} # best to keep them equal > > Installing for example postgresql, will now use uid/gid 20070 instead of 70. Okay, I've finally cleared some room to work on this; sorry about the delay. My main question is where to add these descriptions. Should they go in existing sections where possible? Or are we talking about a new section, and if so, where? At the end of the Dependencies section? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 02:35:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08750106564A; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 02:35:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (lor.one-eyed-alien.net [69.66.77.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651F08FC0C; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 02:35:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5C2Y1wh089141; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:34:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: (from brooks@localhost) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q5C2Y0VD089140; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:34:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from brooks) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:34:00 -0500 From: Brooks Davis To: Michael Scheidell Message-ID: <20120612023400.GA86848@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <4FD4FF32.1060402@FreeBSD.org> <4fd5acfa.idvDPcWpdoIIkuEZ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4FD58604.40806@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FD58604.40806@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, perryh@pluto.rain.com Subject: Re: port unmaintained since 2005? drop it? misc/gpt* X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 02:35:23 -0000 --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 01:45:40AM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 6/11/12 4:31 AM, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > Dunno what (if anything) they are currently good for, but it seems > > that, at a minimum, the PORTVERSION and/or MASTER_SITES -- and the > > pkg-descr -- need to be updated. > They still don't build. > And, they still aren't need by anything in ports tree (again, globus was= =20 > deleted from ports tree in 2008) >=20 > anyone want to maintain them? I'll tag your name on the ports for you. As the person who originally ported and committed them, I say they should be taken out and shot. They were unmaintainable from the start without a significant number of users to drive the upstream to stop making bad decisions. -- Brooks --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFP1qqXXY6L6fI4GtQRAnwkAKDP5JUK+M02uy4d6yny2l8R49wP6wCdGVIn XeuPRY1v/M3iGFi+bOMfa84= =29XI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 03:14:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68928106566C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 03:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: from z.umatar.com (z.umatar.com [66.135.39.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F27E8FC0C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 03:14:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from z.umatar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5C3E50E002599; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:14:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: (from uzimac@localhost) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q5C3E5vP002598; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:14:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) X-Authentication-Warning: z.umatar.com: uzimac set sender to uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com using -f From: "Waitman Gobble" To: Kevin Oberman Message-Id: <1339470844.2302@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Originating-IP: 75.36.149.244 X-Mailer: Usermin 1.500 In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:14:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1339470845" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpng.so.6 missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 03:14:11 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1339470845 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kevin Oberman wrote .. > On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Michael Scheidell > wrote: > > > > > > On 6/11/12 1:44 AM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I was reading the handbook about burning DVD's and thought I would check > >> out K3b as recommended... so I attempted to install from ports. After an > >> hour or so of the make script building a whole bunch of stuff my patience > >> wore out, and I bailed. > >> > >> ports tree csup this morning. > >> > >> Now it seems many things that were working great will no longer load, it's > >> missing libpng.so.6 > >> > >> # SciTE > >> Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by > >> "libpangocairo-1.0.so.0" > >> > >> # qtcreator > >> Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by "libQtGui.so.4" > >> > >> # xxxterm > >> Shared object "libpng.so.6" not found, required by "libwebkitgtk-1.0.so.0" > >> > >> > >> etc, etc. and so on. > >> > >> Anyhow, i am not sure which package 'libpng.so.6' comes from.. anyone have > >> a tip or a pointer? > >> > > something is still looking for an old version of png (libpng.so.6), =A0the new > > version of png uses lib: libpng.so.15. > > Did you rebuild all packages from source? > > quick 'cheat' would be to =A0restore libpng.so.6 to compat library from your > > backup, or another system. > > > > Install sysutils/bsdadminscripts and 'pkg_chklib -o | grep libpng | > sort'. This will provide a list of ports that need to be re-installed > so that they will be linked to the new libpng. As pkg_chklib reports > on every file that references the old libpng, you may see ports listed > several times, once for every executable or shareable that references > libpng.so.6. > > This will really fix the problem. Pulling in a copy of libpng.so.6 > might make things work, but may fail if more than one version of > libpng is linked to different shareables or executables. > -- > R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer > E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Again, thanks for the info. It seems that the script may be pkg_libchk instead of pkg_chklib (?) please confirm. I ran pkg_libchk and it looks like a whole boatload of packages need to be replaced, so I decided to skip to the chase and give the update script a 'replace' option.. it checks the package version available in the packages directory on the freebsd site with what's installed, if there's a newer version it downloads it and does the MD5 check, creates an update.sh script to replace (the update script doesn't actually do any udpating!) Anyhow, with 'replace' it will either replace the existing or use the newer if available. I've been using this script to update the system and it works pretty good for me, except when I veer off path and get into ports like with my libpng issue. :) Anyhow, hopefully this will fix it, I'll try it later tonight. Gotta run. -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA --bound1339470845-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 03:33:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96D0106564A for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 03:33:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A298FC08 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 03:33:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5C3WtXv086393; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:32:55 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q5C3Wtts086390; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:32:55 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:32:55 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Waitman Gobble In-Reply-To: <1339470844.2302@da3m0n8t3r.com> Message-ID: References: <1339470844.2302@da3m0n8t3r.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-ID: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:32:56 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: libpng.so.6 missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 03:33:02 -0000 On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote: > I ran pkg_libchk and it looks like a whole boatload of packages need > to be replaced, so I decided to skip to the chase and give the update > script a 'replace' option.. it checks the package version available in > the packages directory on the freebsd site with what's installed, if > there's a newer version it downloads it and does the MD5 check, > creates an update.sh script to replace (the update script doesn't > actually do any udpating!) Anyhow, with 'replace' it will either > replace the existing or use the newer if available. I've been using > this script to update the system and it works pretty good for me, > except when I veer off path and get into ports like with my libpng > issue. :) There is a pkg_upgrade command in the bsdadminscripts, too. However, pkgng will change all that soon. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 05:07:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3DEA106566B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 05:07:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: from z.umatar.com (z.umatar.com [66.135.39.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741CE8FC0C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 05:07:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from z.umatar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5C57NXi042786; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:07:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: (from uzimac@localhost) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q5C57MlX042782; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:07:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) X-Authentication-Warning: z.umatar.com: uzimac set sender to uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com using -f From: "Waitman Gobble" To: Warren Block Message-Id: <1339477642.42777@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Originating-IP: 75.36.149.244 X-Mailer: Usermin 1.500 In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:07:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1339477642" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: libpng.so.6 missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 05:07:25 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1339477642 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Warren Block wrote .. > On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > > I ran pkg_libchk and it looks like a whole boatload of packages need > > to be replaced, so I decided to skip to the chase and give the update > > script a 'replace' option.. it checks the package version available in > > the packages directory on the freebsd site with what's installed, if > > there's a newer version it downloads it and does the MD5 check, > > creates an update.sh script to replace (the update script doesn't > > actually do any udpating!) Anyhow, with 'replace' it will either > > replace the existing or use the newer if available. I've been using > > this script to update the system and it works pretty good for me, > > except when I veer off path and get into ports like with my libpng > > issue. :) > > There is a pkg_upgrade command in the bsdadminscripts, too. However, > pkgng will change all that soon. Thanks, I tried pkgng a few months ago and it didn't seem to do updates... but I recall many updates on the mail list so I'm sure it's much different now, and works much better. I'll definitely check it out. My update script fixed all problems with libpng, I ran pkg_libchk to verify. I'm glad to know about pkg_libchk, that's a great way to see if there are issues. My system is now working properly, yay. It's really simple, it just looks at what is installed and compares to what's available on freebsd.org, and that's about it. The script does not care about dependencies or what's in ports, etc, which I suppose could be a bad thing. But I've had luck. In my mind the dependencies are already on the system and as long as it's not a major version change there are likely to be no issues. But I've found that (for example) deleting the 2.x pkgs and installing 3.x can cause problems. I am not 100% sure I actually needed to 'reinstall' the packages - b/c it seems like it would essentially pull the same files with same dependencies i think.. Anyhow, I will take a look at the pkg_upgrade script, it would be good to have better automation, as I still have to go through the list of updates and manually mark the ones I don't want to mess with. For example, docbook.. it seems xfce (i think) pulls in like 5 different versions, so the update script gets confused about that. Thanks for the help. -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA --bound1339477642-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 05:37:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1836510656AA for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 05:37:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0ED8FC0A for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 05:37:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042876A601C; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:37:44 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.0x20.net Received: from mail.0x20.net ([217.69.76.211]) by mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WH88vJsDnwfw; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:37:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF8D96A6006; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:37:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5C5bhZQ098143; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:37:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5C5bgT4096395; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:37:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:37:42 +0200 From: Lars Engels To: Waitman Gobble Message-ID: <20120612053742.GE5592@e-new.0x20.net> References: <1339477642.42777@da3m0n8t3r.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BstnvG52tZMVQOpr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1339477642.42777@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Warren Block , Kevin Oberman , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpng.so.6 missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 05:37:45 -0000 --BstnvG52tZMVQOpr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:07:22PM -0700, Waitman Gobble wrote: > Warren Block wrote .. > > On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote: > >=20 > > > I ran pkg_libchk and it looks like a whole boatload of packages need= =20 > > > to be replaced, so I decided to skip to the chase and give the update= =20 > > > script a 'replace' option.. it checks the package version available i= n=20 > > > the packages directory on the freebsd site with what's installed, if= =20 > > > there's a newer version it downloads it and does the MD5 check,=20 > > > creates an update.sh script to replace (the update script doesn't=20 > > > actually do any udpating!) Anyhow, with 'replace' it will either=20 > > > replace the existing or use the newer if available. I've been using= =20 > > > this script to update the system and it works pretty good for me,=20 > > > except when I veer off path and get into ports like with my libpng=20 > > > issue. :) > >=20 > > There is a pkg_upgrade command in the bsdadminscripts, too. However,= =20 > > pkgng will change all that soon. >=20 > Thanks, I tried pkgng a few months ago and it didn't seem to do > updates... but I recall many updates on the mail list so I'm sure it's > much different now, and works much better. I'll definitely check it > out. It does, but you need a working repository for it. --BstnvG52tZMVQOpr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/W1aYACgkQKc512sD3afgO7ACeKTbzgfA9mVSeOvS7zxr5LCrO 5tAAn2s126L2bmNvUr82Ujsi99Jnl9KP =tYke -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BstnvG52tZMVQOpr-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 06:06:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71B1106564A for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 06:06:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: from z.umatar.com (z.umatar.com [66.135.39.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A22648FC12 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 06:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from z.umatar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5C66kW5013618 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:06:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: (from uzimac@localhost) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q5C66k4f013617 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:06:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) X-Authentication-Warning: z.umatar.com: uzimac set sender to uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com using -f From: "Waitman Gobble" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <1339481206.13612@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Originating-IP: 75.36.149.244 X-Mailer: Usermin 1.500 In-Reply-To: <20120612053742.GE5592@e-new.0x20.net> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:06:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1339481206" Subject: Re: libpng.so.6 missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 06:06:46 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1339481206 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lars Engels wrote .. > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:07:22PM -0700, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > Warren Block wrote .. > > > On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > > > > > > I ran pkg_libchk and it looks like a whole boatload of packages need > > > > to be replaced, so I decided to skip to the chase and give the update > > > > script a 'replace' option.. it checks the package version available in > > > > the packages directory on the freebsd site with what's installed, if > > > > there's a newer version it downloads it and does the MD5 check, > > > > creates an update.sh script to replace (the update script doesn't > > > > actually do any udpating!) Anyhow, with 'replace' it will either > > > > replace the existing or use the newer if available. I've been using > > > > this script to update the system and it works pretty good for me, > > > > except when I veer off path and get into ports like with my libpng > > > > issue. :) > > > > > > There is a pkg_upgrade command in the bsdadminscripts, too. However, > > > pkgng will change all that soon. > > > > Thanks, I tried pkgng a few months ago and it didn't seem to do > > updates... but I recall many updates on the mail list so I'm sure it's > > much different now, and works much better. I'll definitely check it > > out. > > It does, but you need a working repository for it. I update ports in my sup file, along with the FreeBSD source. I normally csup at least every two weeks. Is this what you mean by working ports repository? I previously ran into a snag if the package version was different than the ports version, and it seems occasionally packages lag a bit. Thank you, -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA --bound1339481206-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 07:19:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91CE1065670 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:19:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2638FC0A for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:19:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081C26A601C; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:19:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.0x20.net Received: from mail.0x20.net ([217.69.76.211]) by mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zKrZCg2z5MYl; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:18:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1FAB6A6006; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:18:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5C7Ixj0034534; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:18:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5C7IxMI033351; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:18:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:18:59 +0200 From: Lars Engels To: Waitman Gobble Message-ID: <20120612071859.GF5592@e-new.0x20.net> References: <20120612053742.GE5592@e-new.0x20.net> <1339481206.13612@da3m0n8t3r.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ccWoVK0blSAgmhl2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1339481206.13612@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpng.so.6 missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:19:03 -0000 --ccWoVK0blSAgmhl2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:06:46PM -0700, Waitman Gobble wrote: > Lars Engels wrote .. > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:07:22PM -0700, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > > Warren Block wrote .. > > > > On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > > >=20 > > > > > I ran pkg_libchk and it looks like a whole boatload of packages n= eed=20 > > > > > to be replaced, so I decided to skip to the chase and give the up= date=20 > > > > > script a 'replace' option.. it checks the package version availab= le in=20 > > > > > the packages directory on the freebsd site with what's installed,= if=20 > > > > > there's a newer version it downloads it and does the MD5 check,= =20 > > > > > creates an update.sh script to replace (the update script doesn't= =20 > > > > > actually do any udpating!) Anyhow, with 'replace' it will either= =20 > > > > > replace the existing or use the newer if available. I've been usi= ng=20 > > > > > this script to update the system and it works pretty good for me,= =20 > > > > > except when I veer off path and get into ports like with my libpn= g=20 > > > > > issue. :) > > > >=20 > > > > There is a pkg_upgrade command in the bsdadminscripts, too. Howeve= r,=20 > > > > pkgng will change all that soon. > > >=20 > > > Thanks, I tried pkgng a few months ago and it didn't seem to do > > > updates... but I recall many updates on the mail list so I'm sure it's > > > much different now, and works much better. I'll definitely check it > > > out. > >=20 > > It does, but you need a working repository for it. >=20 > I update ports in my sup file, along with the FreeBSD source. I > normally csup at least every two weeks. Is this what you mean by > working ports repository? >=20 > I previously ran into a snag if the package version was different than > the ports version, and it seems occasionally packages lag a bit. No, you need a package repository for pkgng, not the ports tree. You can try=20 # setenv PACKAGESITE "http://pkgbeta.freebsd.org/`uname|tr '[:upper:]' '[:l= ower:]'`-`uname -r|cut -d. -f1`-` uname -m`/latest" # pkg update # pkg upgrade But please take note because pkg can also downgrade a package if the remote repository has an older version that the one that you have installed. --ccWoVK0blSAgmhl2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/W7WMACgkQKc512sD3afiVRwCeMjVzablvOnJtEOkjd05dIx4r 6qEAoKtvUFy2GrvxKrrT5+bCzn0FfbWX =NnTM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ccWoVK0blSAgmhl2-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 07:31:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D4C106566B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:31:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: from z.umatar.com (z.umatar.com [66.135.39.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE538FC0C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from z.umatar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5C7VTER087120 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:31:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: (from uzimac@localhost) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q5C7VTR7087119 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:31:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) X-Authentication-Warning: z.umatar.com: uzimac set sender to uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com using -f From: "Waitman Gobble" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <1339486289.86978@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Originating-IP: 75.36.149.244 X-Mailer: Usermin 1.500 In-Reply-To: <20120612071859.GF5592@e-new.0x20.net> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:31:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1339486289" Subject: Re: libpng.so.6 missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:31:30 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1339486289 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lars Engels wrote .. > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:06:46PM -0700, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > Lars Engels wrote .. > > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:07:22PM -0700, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > > > Warren Block wrote .. > > > > > On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I ran pkg_libchk and it looks like a whole boatload of packages need > > > > > > to be replaced, so I decided to skip to the chase and give the update > > > > > > script a 'replace' option.. it checks the package version available in > > > > > > the packages directory on the freebsd site with what's installed, if > > > > > > there's a newer version it downloads it and does the MD5 check, > > > > > > creates an update.sh script to replace (the update script doesn't > > > > > > actually do any udpating!) Anyhow, with 'replace' it will either > > > > > > replace the existing or use the newer if available. I've been using > > > > > > this script to update the system and it works pretty good for me, > > > > > > except when I veer off path and get into ports like with my libpng > > > > > > issue. :) > > > > > > > > > > There is a pkg_upgrade command in the bsdadminscripts, too. However, > > > > > pkgng will change all that soon. > > > > > > > > Thanks, I tried pkgng a few months ago and it didn't seem to do > > > > updates... but I recall many updates on the mail list so I'm sure it's > > > > much different now, and works much better. I'll definitely check it > > > > out. > > > > > > It does, but you need a working repository for it. > > > > I update ports in my sup file, along with the FreeBSD source. I > > normally csup at least every two weeks. Is this what you mean by > > working ports repository? > > > > I previously ran into a snag if the package version was different than > > the ports version, and it seems occasionally packages lag a bit. > > No, you need a package repository for pkgng, not the ports tree. > You can try > # setenv PACKAGESITE "http://pkgbeta.freebsd.org/`uname|tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]'`-`uname > -r|cut -d. -f1`-` uname -m`/latest" > # pkg update > # pkg upgrade > > But please take note because pkg can also downgrade a package if > the remote repository has an older version that the one that you have > installed. Thanks so much for the info. Do you have an idea about how long it would take to replace 700 packages? -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA --bound1339486289-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 08:41:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4C5106564A; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:41:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mx1.bjare.net (mx1.bjare.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5CC8FC0A; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:41:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B3565E223; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:40:30 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx1.bjare.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.617 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.617 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.619, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.596] Received: from mx1.bjare.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.bjare.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id eqoM6eYMD9Ik; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:40:25 +0200 (CEST) X-BN-MX1: ja X-BN-MailInfo: BjareNet Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-041-102.ekt.thalamus.net [195.216.41.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C2985E28F; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:40:24 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FD700BB.9000802@eskk.nu> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:41:31 +0200 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120610 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kde@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080004080508060601020302" Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: make failed for devel/qca X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:41:39 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080004080508060601020302 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Apart from the error the text is referencing to a file, should be /usr/ports/devel/qca/work/qca-2.0.3/conf.log (not config.log) /bin/mkdir -p /usr/ports/devel/qca/work/qca-2.0.3/libdata/pkgconfig Configuring Qt Cryptographic Architecture (QCA) ... Verifying Qt 4 build environment ... ./configure: .qconftemp/conf: not found fail Reason: Unexpected error launching 'conf' ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to kde@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach the "/usr/ports/devel/qca/work/qca-2.0.3/config.log" including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an `ls /var/db/pkg`). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/qca. ===>>> make failed for devel/qca ===>>> Aborting update ===>>> Update for devel/qca failed ===>>> Aborting update Terminated ===>>> The following actions were performed: Upgrade of qt4-qmake-4.8.2 to qt4-qmake-4.8.2_1 Thanks /Leslie --------------080004080508060601020302 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; name="conf.log" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="conf.log" /usr/local/bin/moc-qt4 -DHAVE_MODULES -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_SHARED -I/usr/local/share/qt4/mkspecs/freebsd-g++ -I. -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore -I/usr/local/include/qt4 -I. -I/usr/local/include/qt4 -I/usr/local/include conf4.cpp -o conf4.moc c -pipe -O2 -Wall -W -DHAVE_MODULES -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_SHARED -I/usr/local/share/qt4/mkspecs/freebsd-g++ -I. -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore -I/usr/local/include/qt4 -I. -I/usr/local/include/qt4 -I/usr/local/include -o conf4.o conf4.cpp gmake: c: Kommandot hittades inte gmake: [conf4.o] Fel 127 (ignoreras) Wl,-O1 -pthread -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib/qt4 -o conf conf4.o -L/usr/local/lib/qt4 -L/usr/local/lib -lQtCore -L/usr/local/lib/qt4 -L/usr/local/lib gmake: Wl,-O1: Kommandot hittades inte gmake: [conf] Fel 127 (ignoreras) --------------080004080508060601020302-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 08:55:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469601065676 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:55:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF13C8FC14 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:55:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55556A601C; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:55:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.0x20.net Received: from mail.0x20.net ([217.69.76.211]) by mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uzd-m0pUoDDw; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:55:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 752CF6A6006; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:55:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5C8tYhl034686; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:55:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5C8tXVi033612; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:55:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:55:33 +0200 From: Lars Engels To: Waitman Gobble Message-ID: <20120612085533.GH5592@e-new.0x20.net> References: <20120612071859.GF5592@e-new.0x20.net> <1339486289.86978@da3m0n8t3r.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cQHT7pPGdkbGIWPi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1339486289.86978@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpng.so.6 missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:55:36 -0000 --cQHT7pPGdkbGIWPi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:31:29AM -0700, Waitman Gobble wrote: > Lars Engels wrote .. > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:06:46PM -0700, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > > Lars Engels wrote .. > > > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:07:22PM -0700, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > > > > Warren Block wrote .. > > > > > > On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > I ran pkg_libchk and it looks like a whole boatload of packag= es need > > > > > > > to be replaced, so I decided to skip to the chase and give th= e update > > > > > > > script a 'replace' option.. it checks the package version ava= ilable in > > > > > > > the packages directory on the freebsd site with what's instal= led, if > > > > > > > there's a newer version it downloads it and does the MD5 chec= k,=20 > > > > > > > creates an update.sh script to replace (the update script doe= sn't=20 > > > > > > > actually do any udpating!) Anyhow, with 'replace' it will eit= her=20 > > > > > > > replace the existing or use the newer if available. I've been= using=20 > > > > > > > this script to update the system and it works pretty good for= me,=20 > > > > > > > except when I veer off path and get into ports like with my l= ibpng=20 > > > > > > > issue. :) > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > There is a pkg_upgrade command in the bsdadminscripts, too. Ho= wever,=20 > > > > > > pkgng will change all that soon. > > > > >=20 > > > > > Thanks, I tried pkgng a few months ago and it didn't seem to do > > > > > updates... but I recall many updates on the mail list so I'm sure= it's > > > > > much different now, and works much better. I'll definitely check = it > > > > > out. > > > >=20 > > > > It does, but you need a working repository for it. > > >=20 > > > I update ports in my sup file, along with the FreeBSD source. I > > > normally csup at least every two weeks. Is this what you mean by > > > working ports repository? > > >=20 > > > I previously ran into a snag if the package version was different than > > > the ports version, and it seems occasionally packages lag a bit. > >=20 > > No, you need a package repository for pkgng, not the ports tree. > > You can try=20 > > # setenv PACKAGESITE "http://pkgbeta.freebsd.org/`uname|tr '[:upper:]' = '[:lower:]'`-`uname > > -r|cut -d. -f1`-` uname -m`/latest" > > # pkg update > > # pkg upgrade > >=20 > > But please take note because pkg can also downgrade a package if > > the remote repository has an older version that the one that you have > > installed. >=20 > Thanks so much for the info. Do you have an idea about how long it would = take to replace 700 packages? Much faster than using ports! ;-) I can't tell, it depends on your internet connection, pkgbeta's current bandwidth, etc. But apart from the download it should be pretty fast. Extracting the txz and updating the sqlite database is faster than extracting the tbz and updating /var/db/pkg/* --cQHT7pPGdkbGIWPi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/XBAUACgkQKc512sD3afjyYACfWOr46xN+XwvQwLkjGwWXG3xo XJ4Anip578JyRKtqmjcPcZw8Mq1DpqJd =g2iP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cQHT7pPGdkbGIWPi-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 10:53:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5FF106564A; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:53:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437B58FC16; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsd.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.59] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SeOjH-0001Oo-Bu; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:53:43 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SeOjH-0001Wi-6X; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:53:43 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5CArgJs029537; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:53:42 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5CArgtO029536; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:53:42 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bris.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:53:42 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: kde@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120612105342.GA29505@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Subject: devel/qt4-moc: ERROR: Cannot set the compiler for the configuration tests X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:53:44 -0000 This is on r236740M with GCC: ===> Cleaning for qt4-moc-4.8.2 ===> No options to configure ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE ===> qt4-moc-4.8.2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Extracting for qt4-moc-4.8.2 => SHA256 Checksum OK for KDE/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2.tar.gz. ===> Patching for qt4-moc-4.8.2 ===> Applying extra patch /usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/../../devel/qt4/files/patch-configure ===> qt4-moc-4.8.2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/qmake-qt4 - found ===> Configuring for qt4-moc-4.8.2 ===> FreeBSD 10 autotools fix applied to /usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2/configure /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|target.path.*|target.path=/usr/local/bin|g' -e 's|^TARGET.*|TARGET=moc-qt4|g' /usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2/src/tools/moc/moc.pro /bin/mkdir -p /usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2/mkspecs /bin/ln -sf /usr/local/bin/qmake-qt4 /usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2/bin/qmake ERROR: Cannot set the compiler for the configuration tests ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to kde@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach the "/usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2/config.log" including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an `ls /var/db/pkg`). *** [do-configure] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc. -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 07:48:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237AD1065676 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:48:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bartsch@dssgmbh.de) Received: from dss.incore.de (dss.incore.de [195.145.1.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5BD8FC15 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:48:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inetmail.dmz (inetmail.dmz [10.3.0.3]) by dss.incore.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7535D6FE; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:48:49 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at incore.de Received: from dss.incore.de ([10.3.0.3]) by inetmail.dmz (inetmail.dmz [10.3.0.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id sTpxeBlBHbys; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:48:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.incore (fwintern.dmz [10.0.0.253]) by dss.incore.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3695D6E5; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:46:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pcadmin.incore (pcadmin.incore [192.168.0.140]) by mail.incore (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 069D345084; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:46:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FD6F3C5.8060807@dssgmbh.de> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:46:13 +0200 From: Alfred Bartsch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111007 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4FD1A691.8010300@dssgmbh.de> <4FD23FC4.5070609@FreeBSD.org> <4FD5A4D4.1080707@dssgmbh.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:16:26 +0000 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: "make index" shows missing port directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:48:51 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 11.06.2012 20:28, schrieb Chris Rees: > On 11 June 2012 08:57, Alfred Bartsch wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> >> Am 08.06.2012 22:23, schrieb Chris Rees: >>> On Jun 8, 2012 7:10 PM, "Palle Girgensohn" >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Chris Rees skrev: >>>>> On 8 June 2012 08:15, Alfred Bartsch >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>> ... >>>>>> Adding this missing entry to the portstree should solve >>>>>> this issue. To avoid such problems in the future, it >>>>>> would IMHO be preferable to have only one port >>>>>> (/usr/ports/databases/p5-DBD-mysql), which is able to >>>>>> handle all mysql versions, similar to p5-DBD-Pg. >>>>> >>>>> Actually, I'm looking at moving p5-DBD-Pg to versioned >>>>> ports, since it is less unpredictable to install a >>>>> versioned port, the autodetection logic is messy and >>>>> packages are not built for any but the default version. >>>>> >>>>> Chris >>>> >>>> That is partly true, but it is also strange to have a >>>> versioned port where there is no difference other than the >>>> dependency? >>>> >>> >>> Oops, haha, I remember looking at it and also thinking what >>> you just said. Sorry for the noise. >>> >>> Alfred, there actually is a port databases/p5-DBD-mysql which >>> is the only one that ports should depend on (I had this >>> conversation with Alex Dupre IIRC, the maintainer of mysql). >>> >>> I'll do a quick scan for ports depending on the versioned ports >>> and get PRs in. >>> >>> Chris >> >> Thank you for taking care of this. I really would appreciate to >> have only one port as a BDB - MySQL interface. >> >> There is another issue with make index: >> >> Generating INDEX-8 - please wait.. ... Warning: Duplicate INDEX >> entry: jpeg2ps-a4-1.9_2 Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: >> openldap-sasl-client-2.4.31_1 Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: >> a2ps-a4-4.13b_4 Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: c2ps-a4-4.0_1 >> Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: enscript-a4-1.6.4_5 Warning: >> Duplicate INDEX entry: html2ps-a4-1.0.b7,1 Warning: Duplicate >> INDEX entry: lprps-a4-2.5 Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: >> mp-a4-3.0.1 Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: psutils-a4-1.17_2 >> Done. >> >> Related settings in /etc/make.conf: >> >> A4=yes PAPERSIZE=a4 >> >> The index entries for the "-letter" ports are missing >> afterwards. IMHO this primarily happens because the "-letter" >> (slave-) ports are used as master ports for the "-a4" ports. >> >> Are these different ports related to paper format really needed >> anymore - in times of libpaper? >> >> If yes, I would vote for cleaning the ports tree: - - define >> "real" master ports (e.g. print/enscript, print/a2ps) - - change >> the -letter ports to "real" slave ports - - change the MASTERDIR >> entries in "-a4" and "-letterdj" ports - - take care that >> PKGNAMESUFFIX is set in the slave ports only >> >> BTW: There is a tool named p5-FreeBSD-Portindex written by >> Matthew Seaman, which creates a complete index file (=containing >> every port directory), not showing these weaknesses. >> >> The openldap duplicate entry results of setting port option >> "SASL". There is another issue with this port: The package origin >> is stored as net/openldap24-client even with option "SASL" set. >> This port is a dependancy of some kde ports. Every time I'm >> rebuilding one of these ports, portmaster tries to build >> openldap24-sasl-client, even if it is already installed. Manually >> changing the ORIGIN entry in /var/db/pkg solved this issue for >> me. > > You have stumbled upon a known problem. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/162088 > > I'm not quite sure I agree with the closure however, since a > solution is not made, rather a workaround. > Thank you for esponding. Yes, you are (partly) right. I was the originator of that PR. It was closed due to "out of ideas". This time I chose a direct mailing instead of posting a follow-up to that closed PR. If you'd take another look at my actual post, you will see that this time I'm trying to propose a solution to this "systemic issue", which has been in the ports tree for a very long time. I'm looking forward to your comments. - -- Regards Alfred Bartsch Data-Service GmbH -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/W88UACgkQ5QGe2JdVf3jwEwCfX0bFWKx84mUxytOvqYYmGofA IQAAnA8p+WznlOCxyt1oKLUkCsJ2pMiV =yBq1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 11:39:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13886106564A; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:39:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14A78FC08; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:39:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so3419209vbm.13 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 04:39:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=NXZua37CXzk2T3k9NQyOW7KcmKJjYKmd52glU2cTuFM=; b=DAfW01H3J2aNUaZaoIBzsdXw7C4nYxwORPNxeJeY0VWlTjk0pqaBI0IKwj6cLU4DQP L2qdv+6HqC8oQMM3v7Rkj9ceM3ZDWCASdfC+H+FpWQSt5zbp7zR13tI4HSUuvhpB9PpQ tUOTU0S0D/UslvzP0QFwM0BVSChQuG3H7CCc1HD1mFZ5ahKofyqrSsc3vkkqXB9OzTNi 48IqG7S4AHQbs5AUcXKrlTiYKtZZvAwmpYFYl5hurXxe9K0RURwDaTuekAHce2CmABNA YOG6p7dzQrEWf73cgxd8STgtfZNbMsSU1Nl3KIcucJnoXQ5FbsL9lcxXJWKyRupCxlPp Vqvw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.240.178 with SMTP id wb18mr11994408vdc.100.1339501157268; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 04:39:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.18.139 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 04:39:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:39:17 +0200 Message-ID: From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: demon@freebsd.org, thorsten.greiner@web.de Subject: Re: Memory leak in xfce4-netload-plugin and xfce4-systemload-plugin - only on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:39:19 -0000 Update: I have now updated to Xfce 4.10 and the problem still persists. Data point: I have a laptop which runs Xubuntu 12.04 (which uses Xfce 4.8). I run the same xfce plugins there, but do not see any memory leak in them. Any hints on how to better narrowing this down, or how to fix it are welcome. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 11:52:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6195106566B; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:52:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from subbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gg0-f182.google.com (mail-gg0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA628FC0C; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:52:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnm2 with SMTP id m2so3757102ggn.13 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 04:52:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=v5WvMH0zU/OslWNaEAjf7PpspteselFqNVWMHtUNVpo=; b=eTrg04cwqQEgQK6PUoO4mI4FWnlTqQppaAnAvyiuXl1S7WZ4He3lxMhC7FoaoNrSrW Sei8vInNRlzGKxC1YNzVOF20Ki2AB/jTvAGFixnBI0L/8X9GIt6c5lzeojdcmcD6BReu Oqv0z5eVNNh37YcvD8bsrNkb51w/e0i3vbXqkoIeNnWWTWSsmadz9qku6P1gGPUKKz1t jVVVRkhpSFmicWxnWVaC1NK4N0S/EFWpmzzFSkbNU1fO4tLbFaqkSI7VMApLjmzt1FXT a7vQ1upvYjKJ38ucPlnBea2Ae/TNv6/hsHGeM4CKDDnUVNzx9p3ZhKZj9UtoJq5U9JrU 4bZQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.23.193 with SMTP id o1mr19962643oef.7.1339501960961; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 04:52:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.8.163 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 04:52:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120612105342.GA29505@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20120612105342.GA29505@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:52:40 +0400 Message-ID: From: Subbsd To: Anton Shterenlikht Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: kde@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devel/qt4-moc: ERROR: Cannot set the compiler for the configuration tests X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:52:42 -0000 On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Anton Shterenlikht w= rote: > This is on r236740M with GCC: > > =3D=3D=3D> =A0Cleaning for qt4-moc-4.8.2 > =3D=3D=3D> No options to configure > =3D=3D=3D> =A0License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE > =3D=3D=3D> =A0 qt4-moc-4.8.2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > =3D=3D=3D> =A0Extracting for qt4-moc-4.8.2 > =3D> SHA256 Checksum OK for KDE/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2.tar.gz= . > =3D=3D=3D> =A0Patching for qt4-moc-4.8.2 > =3D=3D=3D> =A0Applying extra patch /usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/../../devel/q= t4/files/patch-configure > =3D=3D=3D> =A0 qt4-moc-4.8.2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/qmake-qt4 - = found > =3D=3D=3D> =A0Configuring for qt4-moc-4.8.2 > =3D=3D=3D> =A0 FreeBSD 10 autotools fix applied to /usr/ports/devel/qt4-m= oc/work/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2/configure > /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|target.path.*|target.path=3D/usr/local/bin|g' = =A0-e 's|^TARGET.*|TARGET=3Dmoc-qt4|g' =A0/usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-= everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2/src/tools/moc/moc.pro > /bin/mkdir -p /usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-= 4.8.2/mkspecs > /bin/ln -sf /usr/local/bin/qmake-qt4 /usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-eve= rywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2/bin/qmake > ERROR: Cannot set the compiler for the configuration tests > =3D=3D=3D> =A0Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > Please report the problem to kde@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach the > "/usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2/config.= log" > including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might = be > a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your syst= em > (e.g. an `ls /var/db/pkg`). > *** [do-configure] Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc. > some issue on RELENG_9. This port (4.8.2 version) on the current system build successful a week ago. Looks like recently changes in MK file broke build process because any updatings of this server didn't occur. > > -- > Anton Shterenlikht > Room 2.6, Queen's Building > Mech Eng Dept > Bristol University > University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK > Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 > Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 11:58:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F868106566B; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:58:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fluffy@fluffy.khv.ru) Received: from forward14.mail.yandex.net (forward14.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEF18FC1F; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:58:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp11.mail.yandex.net (smtp11.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.67]) by forward14.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 5CB291980F9F; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:57:59 +0400 (MSK) Received: from smtp11.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp11.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 173DC7E0481; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:57:59 +0400 (MSK) Received: from host85.static2.l2tp.ttkdv.ru (host85.static2.l2tp.ttkdv.ru [46.38.1.85]) by smtp11.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id vukeLeef-vvkqEPF8; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:57:58 +0400 X-Yandex-Rcpt-Suid: subbsd@gmail.com X-Yandex-Rcpt-Suid: mexas@bristol.ac.uk X-Yandex-Rcpt-Suid: kde@freebsd.org X-Yandex-Rcpt-Suid: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <4FD72ED0.8010205@fluffy.khv.ru> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 22:58:08 +1100 From: Dima Panov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subbsd References: <20120612105342.GA29505@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: kde@freebsd.org, Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devel/qt4-moc: ERROR: Cannot set the compiler for the configuration tests X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fluffy@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:58:01 -0000 12.06.2012 22:52, Subbsd напиÑал: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> This is on r236740M with GCC: >> >> ===> Cleaning for qt4-moc-4.8.2 >> ===> No options to configure >> ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE >> ===> qt4-moc-4.8.2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found >> ===> Extracting for qt4-moc-4.8.2 >> => SHA256 Checksum OK for KDE/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2.tar.gz. >> ===> Patching for qt4-moc-4.8.2 >> ===> Applying extra patch /usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/../../devel/qt4/files/patch-configure >> ===> qt4-moc-4.8.2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/qmake-qt4 - found >> ===> Configuring for qt4-moc-4.8.2 >> ===> FreeBSD 10 autotools fix applied to /usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2/configure >> /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|target.path.*|target.path=/usr/local/bin|g' -e 's|^TARGET.*|TARGET=moc-qt4|g' /usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2/src/tools/moc/moc.pro >> /bin/mkdir -p /usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2/mkspecs >> /bin/ln -sf /usr/local/bin/qmake-qt4 /usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2/bin/qmake >> ERROR: Cannot set the compiler for the configuration tests >> ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. >> Please report the problem to kde@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach the >> "/usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2/config.log" >> including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be >> a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system >> (e.g. an `ls /var/db/pkg`). >> *** [do-configure] Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc. >> > some issue on RELENG_9. This port (4.8.2 version) on the current > system build successful a week ago. Looks like recently changes in MK > file broke build process because any updatings of this server didn't > occur. > Sorry folks, it was my fault with qmake logic. Fixed now in portstree, please update -- Dima Panov (fluffy@FreeBSD.org) (KDE, Office)@FreeBSD team Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/fluffy.khv IRC: fluffy@EFNet, fluffykhv@FreeNode twitter: fluffy_khv | skype: dima.panov From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 12:17:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603CB1065680 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:17:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin@colinbaker.org) Received: from mail.derivataters.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:0:202::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B068FC1D for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colinb.colo.supranet.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.derivataters.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD37667833 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:08:14 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Received: from mail.derivataters.com ([127.0.0.1]) by colinb.colo.supranet.net (colinb.colo.supranet.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id a1XVQk_5g0J0 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:08:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from colinb.office.supranet.net (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:104:d267:e5ff:fe19:15bd]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.derivataters.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2FD667832 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:08:13 -0500 (CDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-ports Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:18:40 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Colin Baker" Organization: American Parking Federation Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.64 (Linux) Subject: Install of devel/pear hangs X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:17:08 -0000 Hello, Been having some trouble installing devel/pear on a server after migrating PHP packages from php5-* to php53-*. Regardless of whether I use portmaster or 'make install', it hangs at the same spot: # make install ===> Installing for pear-1.9.4_1 ===> pear-1.9.4_1 depends on file: /usr/local/include/php/main/php.h - found ===> pear-1.9.4_1 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/php/20090626/xml.so - found ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if devel/pear already installed where it will happily sit for days if I don't intervene. Is there any way to see what it's trying to do at this stage? Or is this something anybody else has run into? -Colin From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 13:07:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE051065673 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:07:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adams-freebsd@ateamsystems.com) Received: from fss.sandiego.ateamservers.com (fss.sandiego.ateamservers.com [69.55.229.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A6C8FC1D for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:07:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.15.220] (unknown [118.175.84.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fss.sandiego.ateamservers.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4490BB9F24; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:07:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FD73EE9.3050408@ateamsystems.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 20:06:49 +0700 From: Adam Strohl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Colin Baker References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Install of devel/pear hangs X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:07:03 -0000 On 6/12/2012 19:18, Colin Baker wrote: > Hello, > > Been having some trouble installing devel/pear on a server after > migrating PHP packages from php5-* to php53-*. Regardless of whether I > use portmaster or 'make install', it hangs at the same spot: > > # make install > ===> Installing for pear-1.9.4_1 > ===> pear-1.9.4_1 depends on file: /usr/local/include/php/main/php.h - > found > ===> pear-1.9.4_1 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/php/20090626/xml.so - > found > ===> Generating temporary packing list > ===> Checking if devel/pear already installed > > where it will happily sit for days if I don't intervene. Is there any > way to see what it's trying to do at this stage? Or is this something > anybody else has run into? Try using truss (ie; "truss make install") -- Adam Strohl http://www.ateamsystems.com/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 13:48:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8387F106567C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:48:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glarkin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.sourcehosting.net (mail1.sourcehosting.net [74.205.51.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563A18FC19 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 24-181-237-39.dhcp.oxfr.ma.charter.com ([24.181.237.39] helo=Gregory-Larkins-iMac.local) by mail1.sourcehosting.net with esmtp (Exim 4.73 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1SeRS1-0000qR-5P; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:48:11 -0400 Received: from Gregory-Larkins-iMac.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Gregory-Larkins-iMac.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FCA134411C; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:48:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FD74894.2070403@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:48:04 -0400 From: Greg Larkin Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120601 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Colin Baker References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 24.181.237.39 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: glarkin@FreeBSD.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail1.sourcehosting.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC,TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.sourcehosting.net) Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Install of devel/pear hangs X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: glarkin@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:48:18 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 6/12/12 8:18 AM, Colin Baker wrote: > Hello, > > Been having some trouble installing devel/pear on a server after > migrating PHP packages from php5-* to php53-*. Regardless of > whether I use portmaster or 'make install', it hangs at the same > spot: > > # make install ===> Installing for pear-1.9.4_1 ===> > pear-1.9.4_1 depends on file: /usr/local/include/php/main/php.h - > found ===> pear-1.9.4_1 depends on file: > /usr/local/lib/php/20090626/xml.so - found ===> Generating > temporary packing list ===> Checking if devel/pear already > installed > > where it will happily sit for days if I don't intervene. Is there > any way to see what it's trying to do at this stage? Or is this > something anybody else has run into? > > -Colin Hi Colin, Try running the command like this: make -d A install |& tee /tmp/pear.log Once it hangs, press Ctrl-C and check /tmp/pear.log. At the end of the file, you should see the command that make spawned before the install process hung. Hope that helps, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. http://twitter.com/cpucycle/ - Follow you, follow me -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/XSJQACgkQ0sRouByUApDE4QCghI/TnvwSUeS5mK6iTxXUkK6D UbwAn3qnferqldu9hjpd+sZdZIXXl87Q =XBo3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 14:19:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654D8106566B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:19:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: from z.umatar.com (z.umatar.com [66.135.39.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB528FC0C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:19:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from z.umatar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5CEJAAF080998; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:19:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: (from uzimac@localhost) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q5CEJ9vV080997; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:19:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) X-Authentication-Warning: z.umatar.com: uzimac set sender to uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com using -f From: "Waitman Gobble" To: Lars Engels Message-Id: <1339510749.80992@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Originating-IP: 75.36.149.244 X-Mailer: Usermin 1.500 In-Reply-To: <20120612085533.GH5592@e-new.0x20.net> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:19:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1339510749" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpng.so.6 missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:19:12 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1339510749 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lars Engels wrote .. > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:31:29AM -0700, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > Lars Engels wrote .. > > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:06:46PM -0700, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > > > Lars Engels wrote .. > > > > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:07:22PM -0700, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > > > > > Warren Block wrote .. > > > > > > > On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I ran pkg_libchk and it looks like a whole boatload of packages need > > > > > > > > to be replaced, so I decided to skip to the chase and give the update > > > > > > > > script a 'replace' option.. it checks the package version available > in > > > > > > > > the packages directory on the freebsd site with what's installed, > if > > > > > > > > there's a newer version it downloads it and does the MD5 check, > > > > > > > > creates an update.sh script to replace (the update script doesn't > > > > > > > > actually do any udpating!) Anyhow, with 'replace' it will either > > > > > > > > replace the existing or use the newer if available. I've been using > > > > > > > > this script to update the system and it works pretty good for me, > > > > > > > > except when I veer off path and get into ports like with my libpng > > > > > > > > issue. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is a pkg_upgrade command in the bsdadminscripts, too. However, > > > > > > > pkgng will change all that soon. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, I tried pkgng a few months ago and it didn't seem to do > > > > > > updates... but I recall many updates on the mail list so I'm sure it's > > > > > > much different now, and works much better. I'll definitely check it > > > > > > out. > > > > > > > > > > It does, but you need a working repository for it. > > > > > > > > I update ports in my sup file, along with the FreeBSD source. I > > > > normally csup at least every two weeks. Is this what you mean by > > > > working ports repository? > > > > > > > > I previously ran into a snag if the package version was different than > > > > the ports version, and it seems occasionally packages lag a bit. > > > > > > No, you need a package repository for pkgng, not the ports tree. > > > You can try > > > # setenv PACKAGESITE "http://pkgbeta.freebsd.org/`uname|tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]'`-`uname > > > -r|cut -d. -f1`-` uname -m`/latest" > > > # pkg update > > > # pkg upgrade > > > > > > But please take note because pkg can also downgrade a package if > > > the remote repository has an older version that the one that you have > > > installed. > > > > Thanks so much for the info. Do you have an idea about how long it would take > to replace 700 packages? > > Much faster than using ports! ;-) > I can't tell, it depends on your internet connection, pkgbeta's current > bandwidth, etc. But apart from the download it should be pretty fast. > Extracting the txz and updating the sqlite database is faster than > extracting the tbz and updating /var/db/pkg/* Thanks, I'll check it out. I'm looking through the pkgng source code on git. One thing - on the pkgbeta link the packages are a month old... before the libpng update I think... I assume that when pkgng is worked out (based on my search of recent mail list messages it's under development).. the package repository will be current. But at the moment it might be messy to implement on my machine. Last night I think it took about 30 minutes to pkg_delete and pkg_add all packages, apart from downloading. The download and MD5 check happens before any updates so it's separate, I wasn't paying attention to the download time, which isn't really a concern in comparison. -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA --bound1339510749-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 14:20:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E38106566C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin@colinbaker.org) Received: from mail.derivataters.com (colinb.colo.supranet.net [66.170.13.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5B38FC08 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colinb.colo.supranet.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.derivataters.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0676667833 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:11:59 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com Received: from mail.derivataters.com ([127.0.0.1]) by colinb.colo.supranet.net (colinb.colo.supranet.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id mE5UlERsBpPs for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:11:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from colinb.office.supranet.net (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:104:d267:e5ff:fe19:15bd]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.derivataters.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B1BD67832 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:11:58 -0500 (CDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4FD74894.2070403@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:22:25 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Colin Baker" Organization: American Parking Federation Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4FD74894.2070403@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.64 (Linux) Subject: Re: Install of devel/pear hangs X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:20:45 -0000 On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:48:04 -0500, Greg Larkin wrote: > > Hi Colin, > > Try running the command like this: > > make -d A install |& tee /tmp/pear.log > > Once it hangs, press Ctrl-C and check /tmp/pear.log. At the end of > the file, you should see the command that make spawned before the > install process hung. > Thank you, that cleared things up! Turned out to be a third party PHP module that was breaking the CLI php executable. Got it working now, I greatly appreciate the suggestions. -Colin From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 15:44:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0CAE1065750 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:44:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2AD8FC0A for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 9997656205; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:44:56 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:44:56 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Waitman Gobble Message-ID: <20120612154456.GB22912@lonesome.com> References: <20120612085533.GH5592@e-new.0x20.net> <1339510749.80992@da3m0n8t3r.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1339510749.80992@da3m0n8t3r.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Lars Engels , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpng.so.6 missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:44:57 -0000 On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 07:19:09AM -0700, Waitman Gobble wrote: > One thing - on the pkgbeta link the packages are a month old... There's been a regression with how pkgng handles lang/python* and until we fix that we can't upload new packages. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 16:21:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594CB1065670 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coder@tuxfamily.org) Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140148FC08 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:20:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (unknown [88.184.221.231]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771CFA62BE for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:20:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FD76C64.2050303@tuxfamily.org> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:20:52 +0200 From: "coder.tuxfamily" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120610 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Need advice for a new port ?/libgta X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:21:00 -0000 Hello, I finished to make the ports of libgta (http://gta.nongnu.org/libgta.html). But i don't really know what can be the category. Maybe "Math" because the lib is about Array. What is your advice ? Regards, From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 16:45:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC3D106566B for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:45:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: from z.umatar.com (z.umatar.com [66.135.39.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA27F8FC0A for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from z.umatar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5CGj4p1093473; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:45:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: (from uzimac@localhost) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q5CGj4vs093472; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:45:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) X-Authentication-Warning: z.umatar.com: uzimac set sender to uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com using -f From: "Waitman Gobble" To: Mark Linimon Message-Id: <1339519504.93459@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Originating-IP: 70.90.171.37 X-Mailer: Usermin 1.500 In-Reply-To: <20120612154456.GB22912@lonesome.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:45:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1339519504" Cc: Lars Engels , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpng.so.6 missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:45:08 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1339519504 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mark Linimon wrote .. > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 07:19:09AM -0700, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > One thing - on the pkgbeta link the packages are a month old... > > There's been a regression with how pkgng handles lang/python* and > until we fix that we can't upload new packages. > > mcl > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Thanks. Looking forward to updates. I am not familiar with that particular issue but i'll search. Looks like it just missed xfce4.10 update by a couple of days. ie, sqlite> SELECT * FROM packages WHERE `name` LIKE '%xfce4-session'; 11104|x11-wm/xfce4-session|xfce4-session|4.8.3|Session manager .... -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA --bound1339519504-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 17:15:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4530E1065678 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saschaguse@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDC38FC15 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:15:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so11078981obc.13 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:15:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=x+fKhvEerrmQrn32Y7s/u+y4XrwUOosSzvKqBQghNV0=; b=j4Fj5HFbfeFB2WSZxI2ony0FM5HcyCoVXhM8flCaflWNAU6FsDqHAPNUdUUpdPFpmI lJpKeKA4IQoFLlgKVtbQuGrJKUoQjGwqocPknM9YHCWkxV0MMs1gsmssHh50zZ+ph0Hh KIJozDuvuHLfABcfKObX3UC4rR0mKW3it4qqgFIq0ShUpmG6CH/7/Tf0mgGthvpRrjLN /5SEKf+E3+kj6XP4YTDAIgVS9qgh3SM3n04i5qA7piaKab/9dyyzPDAWBCACzTVNNsnY CwXojjf0zDEe3nYIhWnfhDa2ExHb9NndnpBUQ+MBvKNB7wXn2HV0X5yHf0yKzX91avkC GvYA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.202.71 with SMTP id kg7mr21240347obc.56.1339521316417; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:15:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.126.179 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:15:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:15:16 +0200 Message-ID: From: Sascha Guse To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: make failed for print/pdflib X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:15:17 -0000 when installing from lang/php53-extensions with PDFlib support do I get the error: --BEGINNING ===> php53-extensions-1.6 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/php/20090626/pdf.so - not found ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/lib/php/20090626/pdf.so in /usr/ports/print/pecl-pdflib ===> pecl-pdflib-2.1.9 depends on file: /usr/local/include/php/main/php.h - found ===> pecl-pdflib-2.1.9 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/phpize - found ===> pecl-pdflib-2.1.9 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/php/20090626/gd.so - found ===> pecl-pdflib-2.1.9 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf-2.69 - found ===> pecl-pdflib-2.1.9 depends on shared library: pdf.6 - not found ===> Verifying install for pdf.6 in /usr/ports/print/pdflib ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE ===> Found saved configuration for pdflib-7.0.5_1 => PDFlib-Lite-7.0.5.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch http://www.pdflib.com/binaries/PDFlib/705/PDFlib-Lite-7.0.5.tar.gz fetch: http://www.pdflib.com/binaries/PDFlib/705/PDFlib-Lite-7.0.5.tar.gz: Not Found => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/PDFlib-Lite-7.0.5.tar.gz fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/PDFlib-Lite-7.0.5.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /usr/distfiles/ and try again. *** Error code 1 --END It seems that the package PDFlib-Lite-7.0.5.tar.gz no longer available. On the website, there is the packet http://www.pdflib.com/binaries/PDFlib/705/PDFlib-Lite-7.0.5p3.tar.gz. Can you update the port? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 17:40:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8A61065675 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:40:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@dataix.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C728FC18 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:40:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so4211154yhg.13 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:40:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dataix.net; s=rsa; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VcbCFsi6Tu0ycc4zcVPiJB/ios3RtJgDRtB138bId8s=; b=fYp4Z9tNkz8nUmkbt89kvgTKj17VRqLVVhe91RZ+FiF9LE5+DSdk87BaiJWq5lSfAl 7Rzk1HkneiFmH48PmjomS1Qa4m+16Yuifg5Pslr8eqEbZg3x94BPnsAxOzMwDtwL8lbv HUTSCRTqW3kqnKFqsPk59KEfIiWGAFbdFh4DM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=VcbCFsi6Tu0ycc4zcVPiJB/ios3RtJgDRtB138bId8s=; b=C5zPcaXwzbRYZnQWdTTtJ+feewv45CqbUO4wFdGHJnLogoy5eGkGAJzci1RLi8HWxn O8lGndYMdTeROOeQ611gRTffyWWjXxOk/VAm/xjjbcC2gMP/D4fm5egU5w+eap9IRK3R 74WC8CN2Y8hCPC2ZD6fSSgx8voecGJRZOtqX1VylcP1n7dokBF3B7bRhRz44wce/ahH5 3A2KsZG22dUr7z3CG5+fVR0lO0cOcqLsZdDxP8L80h+ifGTf4qhILd7SgvoKIEWt0pBi Hscn992J7x/1/mWlNuem1XfSYO5vjE/DTRH1UWxx/rgemMWrEbhte2V23RkysGPv6+2S j5DA== Received: by 10.101.131.14 with SMTP id i14mr8700399ann.44.1339522802077; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (75-128-120-86.dhcp.aldl.mi.charter.com. [75.128.120.86]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z19sm23632anh.22.2012.06.12.10.40.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:40:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5CHdxcw087908 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:39:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Received: (from jh@localhost) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5CHdxUm087907; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:39:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:39:58 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120612173958.GA78172@DataIX.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmTyRXwd+uH8svcioqPupysxPy1qj8sb964RxbCHUBoYgq2TRmuFqcEAUgVcFwgCPJa8TrF Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: [0x721427d8@gmail.com: [php<=5.4.3] Parsing Bug in PHP PDO prepared statements may lead to access violation] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:40:04 -0000 FYI I verified this on a working system. ----- Forwarded message from 0x721427D8 0x721427D8 <0x721427d8@gmail.com> ----- Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:02:43 +0200 From: 0x721427D8 0x721427D8 <0x721427d8@gmail.com> To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com Subject: [php<=5.4.3] Parsing Bug in PHP PDO prepared statements may lead to access violation [php<=5.4.3] Parsing Bug in PHP PDO prepared statements may lead to access violation Affected Product:     PHP Affected Component:   PDO - PHP Data Objects Affected Versions:    <=5.4.3 (latest version and trunk) PHP Bug Ref:          #61755 Patch:                bug61755.diff Discovery Date:       Feb 2012 Advisory Date:        2012-06-10 Description: ------------ Inconsistent parsing of PHP PDO prepared statements. Erroneous design of parsers state machine. Under special circumstances parsing of prepared statements does not stop leading in cycling the whole stack without terminating on \0. This leads to access violations, accessing of stack data, DoS. Bug Description: ---------------- There are several design errors in the state-machine responsible for parsing PHP PDO based statement objects. These errors are based on the state-machines inability to consistently check the supplied SQL-Query. Under special circumstances an attacker is able to force the responsible PDO code to iterate beyond the termination of the supplied query string resulting in a buffer out of bounds access. This access may lead to uncontrollable as well as attacker controllable behavior and Access Violations caused by the code iterating the whole stack and trying to access addresses beyond the stack end. In very unlikely and constructed environments it may also be possible to force parameter rebinding of prepared statements - even though some context specific input filtering is applied - by utilizing the stack cycling behavior of the state machine. This can be accomplished by 1) pushing a manipulated SQL string containing fake parameter bindings (:named:, ?) onto the stack (e.g. using post variables) 2) manipulating the main SQL query string (see preconditions) to make the pdo_parser cycle the stack 3) until it cycles into the fake query previously pushed to stack where the magic happens. This forces the state machine into cycling into random stack data and then into the previously pushed manipulated SQL string with fake parameter bindings. To finalize this attack the manipulated SQL string then terminates the SQL parsing resulting in rebinding of prepared parameters. The attacker needs to know the original binding names (for named parameters) and the number of bound params for this attack to succeed. This scenario is unlikely to occur but as usual in computer security this may be used in conjunction with other attacks to multiply the impact. Preconditions: -------------- * PDO is used to access the DB * For remote attacks: User must be able to directly control any part of the query string prior its preparation (stm->prepare()). We are well aware that this is a general coding fault which leads to other security relevant implications but sadly enough it’s also quite common in many frameworks, projects to use prepared statements with user controlled data instead of binding them after preparation. State-Machine Graph, Test-Scripts, Traces, PoCs are available. Vendor Response: ---------------- * Patch 2012-04-19 (bug61755.diff) (see php bugref) Patch available, but still not fixed in 5.4.3 (latest) Timeline: --------- * 2012 Feb   - Discovered in 5.3.8, verified for 5.3.0/5.3.10 and 5.4.0 * 2012 March - Responsible Disclosure via SSD/BeyondSecurity * 2012 April - Patch available 2012-04-19 * 2012 May/June - No trace of bugfix in svn for 5.3/5.4/trunk although mentioned in bugref #61755 * 2012 June  - No trace of bugfix in svn for 5.3/5.4/trunk, code ... * 2012 June  - public disclosure CREDITS: -------- Discovered by 0x721427D8 via BeyondSecurity - SecuriTeam Secure Disclosure Refs: ----- http://php.net/ http://www.php.net/manual/en/intro.pdo.php http://svn.php.net/viewvc/php/php-src/trunk/ext/pdo/ http://www.securiteam.com/ ----- End forwarded message ----- -- - (2^(N-1)) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 17:55:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770B01065674; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:55:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from felipensp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f49.google.com (mail-qa0-f49.google.com [209.85.216.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF4F8FC0A; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:55:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qabj40 with SMTP id j40so654697qab.15 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:55:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aVZaGnDwAoeX7G4OruGLtv0RYBfUvsqdByAeKMC6Kt4=; b=LKtA31/su0fKun64BFaszbqFS+0icnSPfciRVnjuDUauP2eUCx/VHoON2I+L+DHkI9 tjLGGlsyS+xOzGEM9QoHFVffoh/br2Is+HxvsdTlh9dvzc1gCeMwksKvfau6sNRFjRgW KKO2JKh/sQshxx/LO7o+mSkM6IPMvmFdnBrwFXU2NFP+l+ehu0SBxpBon8fcA0DEZNhe APSmb4+5NJKjaEImhCgIioo6FrXD2cgqAOQJVhuikeYopMW2HHYj3za4mGZIT46yXff0 4BMk8RxM3ut4i+B0QWi+sE5TIb6Pxh3e/acWnH/tpCu6yCHCwan0GyqjgmOduiB4x6hk GXkA== Received: by 10.229.135.209 with SMTP id o17mr8545642qct.18.1339523717208; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:55:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.99.144 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:54:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120612173958.GA78172@DataIX.net> References: <20120612173958.GA78172@DataIX.net> From: Felipe Pena Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:54:56 -0300 Message-ID: To: Jason Hellenthal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [0x721427d8@gmail.com: [php<=5.4.3] Parsing Bug in PHP PDO prepared statements may lead to access violation] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:55:18 -0000 Hi, 2012/6/12 Jason Hellenthal : [...] > > Timeline: > --------- > * 2012 Feb =C2=A0 - Discovered in 5.3.8, verified for 5.3.0/5.3.10 and 5.= 4.0 > * 2012 March - Responsible Disclosure via SSD/BeyondSecurity > * 2012 April - Patch available 2012-04-19 > * 2012 May/June - No trace of bugfix in svn for 5.3/5.4/trunk although > mentioned in bugref #61755 > * 2012 June =C2=A0- No trace of bugfix in svn for 5.3/5.4/trunk, code ... > * 2012 June =C2=A0- public disclosure > No trace of bugfix in June? It has been fixed in Apr. http://git.php.net/?p=3Dphp-src.git;a=3Dcommitdiff;h=3D1b78aef426a8f413ddd7= 0854eb3fd5fbc95ef675 --=20 Regards, Felipe Pena From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 18:02:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0E4106566C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:02:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7908FC12 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5CI2ixt005625; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:02:45 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Message-ID: <4FD78444.7090808@missouri.edu> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:02:44 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "coder.tuxfamily" References: <4FD76C64.2050303@tuxfamily.org> In-Reply-To: <4FD76C64.2050303@tuxfamily.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Need advice for a new port ?/libgta X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:02:52 -0000 On 06/12/2012 11:20 AM, coder.tuxfamily wrote: > Hello, > > I finished to make the ports of libgta > (http://gta.nongnu.org/libgta.html). But i don't really know what can be > the category. > > Maybe "Math" because the lib is about Array. > > What is your advice ? My suggestion is the "devel" category. Or perhaps the "databases" category, because really it is a format for storing data, but maybe "databases" has more specific meanings like data stored with an index. I don't recommend "math" though. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 18:57:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7908B106566C; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:57:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from subbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gh0-f182.google.com (mail-gh0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240E38FC0A; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:57:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghbz22 with SMTP id z22so4260643ghb.13 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:57:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=fLrWZDv5I2Z4GDbnaryEaW1Iiix6yf+ZcIMAGkXIkKw=; b=CM3yxixYItSDMkIaTQZo9LOaDhnID45RYBzw6vpRbtpC/JMqjESoWg73kZXu6JIfiI QZw04hi8L/SoJwOtZdk4tGwIAwwYiRdN/fbm3fJK4Rd067qrH/9QMBFnOXRv/+sc99rc qYhf3dLDDnZR7JEfYhRpst58c2/kwpx4ZzVRQlOKtq4GUTXYeOYBCVmtjPcYb1M3KHm4 w5YOlLFXijfvCuCLAyu8Y+b4pG5Q/DCgGYw5kuUFjQOhyxsQYtksZKe8dXls5/PbV6mF 79SXk6kmfHzkylY+NnEwLosBfqu2wXuyMnFMlhWEn1c52LwwNFJUgBBVf3ysDjw3Sm9h lmqQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.20.197 with SMTP id p5mr20403439oee.32.1339527464655; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.8.163 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 22:57:44 +0400 Message-ID: From: Subbsd To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: bapt@freebsd.org, dan@langille.org Subject: pkgng detect conflict between bacula-server and bacula-client ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:57:46 -0000 Hi, Ive try to use pkgng ( WITH_PKGNG=yes ) for build new environment and got failed: ... ===> Registering installation for bacula-server-5.2.6 Installing bacula-server-5.2.6...pkg: bacula-server-5.2.6 conflicts with bacula-client-5.2.6 (installs files into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/man/man8/bacula-fd.8.gz *** Error code 3 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-server. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-server. ===>>> Installation of bacula-server-5.2.6 (sysutils/bacula-server) failed ===>>> Aborting update ===>>> Update for sysutils/bacula-server failed ===>>> Aborting update Terminated ... As i see, /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-client/Makefile use /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-server/Makefile. And this looks like bacula-fd.8.gz should be in Makefile or in case(WITH_CLIENT_ONLY) constructions because file relating to *-client port. However, bacula-fd.8.gz will appear in any case with installation of *-server part too: .. .if defined(WITH_CLIENT_ONLY) MAN8= bacula-fd.8 bconsole.8 EXTRA_PATCHES+= ${FILESDIR}/extra__manpages__Makefile.in .else MAN1= bat.1 bsmtp.1 bacula-tray-monitor.1 bacula-bwxconsole.1 MAN8= bacula.8 bacula-dir.8 bacula-fd.8 bacula-sd.8 bconsole.8 \ bcopy.8 bextract.8 bls.8 bregex.8 bscan.8 btape.8 \ btraceback.8 bwild.8 dbcheck.8 .. In this case the logic is broken and I should register PR to a bacula maintainer for spliting conflict files or such situation is normal and isn't considered by pkgng? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 22:05:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B45106564A for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 22:05:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mazhe@alkumuna.eu) Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (smtp1-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0798FC08 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 22:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yggdrasil.alkumuna.eu (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e35:8a74:6e70:232:36ff:fe5c:3a87]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7054D940142 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:05:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from freedom.alkumuna.eu ([192.168.10.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by yggdrasil.alkumuna.eu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5CM5K7i056725 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:05:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mazhe@alkumuna.eu) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:05:20 +0200 From: Matthieu Volat To: ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20120613000520.12015a65.mazhe@alkumuna.eu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.4 (GTK+ 2.24.10; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Imagemagick: FAIL, now in Magick++/demo/analyze.sh X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 22:05:30 -0000 On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > The new version fails in a new location, even with the default options. > It seems to me that this failure cames from the fact that the tests try to dynamicaly load modules from the path where the previous version is installed instead of build dirs. Basicaly, the test do the following (I've cut through various shell wrappers to be able to use gdb): cd /usr/ports/graphics/ImageMagick/work/ImageMagick-6.7.7-7 env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=magick/.libs:wand/.libs:Magick++/lib/.libs MAGICK_CODER_MODULE_PATH=coders/.libs MAGICK_FILTER_MODULE_PATH=filters/.libs ./Magick++/demo/.libs/analyze ./Magick++/demo/model.miff The problem is, you can check by running the test through gdb, that amongst the dlopen-ed libraries, /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.7.7/modules-Q16/filters/analyze.so is used as if the MAGICK_FILTER_MODULE_PATH environment variable was not working. A quick and dirty test is to save /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.7.7/modules-Q16/filters/analyze.so and /usr/local/lib/ImageMagick-6.7.7/modules-Q16/filters/analyze.la, and to replace them with the versions just built. In my case, the test passed. I am not too sure about how to fix that however... If I have some time, I will check that the MAGICK_FILTER_MODULE_PATH value is really checked before the normal installation path. About my setup : I'm running freebsd 9.0, amd64 and building with clang, openmp support is disabled. -- Matthieu Volat From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 02:53:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865A9106564A for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 02:53:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2428FC15 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 02:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x220.ovitrap.com ([122.129.201.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q5D2r5EC028866 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 20:53:06 -0600 From: Erich To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:53:04 +0700 Message-ID: <29122915.NDnaqcIOs3@x220.ovitrap.com> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.3 (Linux/3.3.7-1.fc16.x86_64; KDE/4.8.3; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Why are you NOT using FreeBSD --> an example X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 02:53:12 -0000 Hi, I placed FreeBSD 10 on an empty disk and downloaded then the ports tree= from yesterday. /etc/make/conf looks like this: # Uncomment this if you want to do port builds with no interaction #BATCH=3Dyes # Keep KDE4 in /usr/local, fixes sharing of icons / mime and others KDE4_PREFIX=3D/usr/local # added by use.perl 2012-01-05 20:44:40 PERL_VERSION=3D5.12.4 # # 12.06.12 ed: added to support new Intel KMS. # WITH_NEW_XORG=3Dtrue All the rest is plain default. One thing I have to mention as it might is the cause. I used PCBSD to g= et FreeBSD onto the machine and upgraded then via sources to 10. I extra did not do anything else as I wanted to show how newcomers who = just follow 'official' documentation hit a wall during this procedurefr= ee. I used this page to get information for installing X with Intel KMS sup= port: http://wiki.freebsd.org/Intel_GPU Here is the current status: Ports tree downloaded during the day 12.06.12 Installation of Joe. Joe is always the first port I install as I am used to its commands. I = then download and compile other ports. As I am currently on a low-bandw= idth Internet connection, I try to keep the machine busy during the nig= ht with large downloads. Parallel downloading and compilation of scribus and xorg-server This error came from compiling scribus while xorg was still downloading= : g++ -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -Wall -W -DQT_NO_CAST_FROM_AS= CII -DQT_NO_CAST_TO_ASCII -DQFORMINTERNAL_NAMESPACE -DQT_KEYWORDS -DQT_= NO_DEBUG -DQT_XML_LIB -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_HAVE_MMX -DQT_HAV= E_SSE -DQT_HAVE_MMXEXT -DQT_HAVE_SSE2 -DQT_HAVE_SSE3 -DQT_HAVE_SSSE3 -D= _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -DQT_SHARED -I/usr/local/share/= qt4/mkspecs/freebsd-g++ -I. -I../../../include/QtUiTools -I../../../inc= lude/QtCore -I../../../include/QtGui -I../../../include/QtXml -I../../.= ./include -I../shared -I../../designer/src/uitools -I../../designer/src= /lib/uilib -I.moc/release-shared -I.uic/release-shared -I/usr/local/inc= lude/qt4 -I/usr/local/include -o .obj/release-shared/moc_finddialog.o .= moc/release-shared/moc_finddialog.cpp g++ -Wl,-rpath-link,/usr/ports/devel/qt4-linguist/work/qt-everywhere-op= ensource-src-4.8.2/lib -Wl,-O1 -pthread -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib/qt4 -= Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib/qt4 -o ../../../bin/linguist-qt4 .obj/release-= shared/numerus.o .obj/release-shared/translator.o .obj/release-shared= /translatormessage.o .obj/release-shared/qm.o .obj/release-shared/qph= .o .obj/release-shared/po.o .obj/release-shared/ts.o .obj/release-sh= ared/xliff.o .obj/release-shared/batchtranslationdialog.o .obj/releas= e-shared/errorsview.o .obj/release-shared/finddialog.o .obj/release-s= hared/formpreviewview.o .obj/release-shared/globals.o .obj/release-sh= ared/main.o .obj/release-shared/mainwindow.o .obj/release-shared/mess= ageeditor.o .obj/release-shared/messageeditorwidgets.o .obj/release-s= hared/messagehighlighter.o .obj/release-shared/messagemodel.o .obj/re= lease-shared/phrasebookbox.o .obj/release-shared/phrase.o .obj/releas= e-shared/phrasemodel.o .obj/release-shared/phraseview.o .obj/release-= shared/printout.o .obj/release-shared/recentfiles.o .obj/release-shar= ed/sourcecodeview.o .obj/release-shared/statistics.o .obj/release-sha= red/translatedialog.o .obj/release-shared/translationsettingsdialog.o = .obj/release-shared/simtexth.o .obj/release-shared/moc_batchtranslati= ondialog.o .obj/release-shared/moc_errorsview.o .obj/release-shared/m= oc_finddialog.o .obj/release-shared/moc_formpreviewview.o .obj/releas= e-shared/moc_mainwindow.o .obj/release-shared/moc_messageeditor.o .ob= j/release-shared/moc_messageeditorwidgets.o .obj/release-shared/moc_me= ssagehighlighter.o .obj/release-shared/moc_messagemodel.o .obj/releas= e-shared/moc_phrasebookbox.o .obj/release-shared/moc_phrase.o .obj/re= lease-shared/moc_phrasemodel.o .obj/release-shared/moc_phraseview.o .= obj/release-shared/moc_recentfiles.o .obj/release-shared/moc_sourcecod= eview.o .obj/release-shared/moc_statistics.o .obj/release-shared/moc_= translatedialog.o .obj/release-shared/moc_translationsettingsdialog.o = .obj/release-shared/qrc_linguist.o -L/usr/ports/devel/qt4-linguist/= work/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.8.2/lib -L/usr/local/lib/qt4 -L/usr= /local/lib -L/usr/ports/devel/qt4-linguist/work/qt-everywhere-opensourc= e-src-4.8.2/lib -L/usr/local/lib/qt4 -L/usr/local/lib -lQtUiTools -lQtX= ml -lQtGui -lQtCore .obj/release-shared/mainwindow.o:(.rodata._ZTV19SortedContextsModel[_ZT= V19SortedContextsModel]+0xc0): undefined reference to `QAbstractProxyMo= del::setItemData(QModelIndex const&, QMap const&)' .obj/release-shared/mainwindow.o:(.rodata._ZTV19SortedMessagesModel[_ZT= V19SortedMessagesModel]+0xc0): undefined reference to `QAbstractProxyMo= del::setItemData(QModelIndex const&, QMap const&)' *** [../../../bin/linguist-qt4] Error code 1 1 error *** [first] Error code 2 1 error *** [sub-linguist-make_default] Error code 2 4 errors *** [do-build] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/qt4-linguist. We started to compile xorg-server after the download was finished. There was this error message then: Requested 'dri >=3D 7.8.0' but version of dri is 7.6.1 Obviously, an old version was kept in the ports. Later KDE4 failed with In file included from /usr/ports/accessibility/jovie/work/jovie-4.8.3/l= ibkttsd/filterproc.cpp:153: /usr/ports/accessibility/jovie/work/jovie-4.8.3/libkttsd/filterproc.moc= :47: error: no 'void KttsFilterProc::qt_static_metacall(QObject*, QMeta= Object::Call, int, void**)' member function declared in class 'KttsFilt= erProc' /usr/ports/accessibility/jovie/work/jovie-4.8.3/libkttsd/filterproc.moc= :61: error: 'const QMetaObjectExtraData KttsFilterProc::staticMetaObjec= tExtraData' is not a static member of 'class KttsFilterProc' /usr/ports/accessibility/jovie/work/jovie-4.8.3/libkttsd/filterproc.moc= :63: error: argument of type 'void (KttsFilterProc::)(QObject*, QMetaOb= ject::Call, int, void**)' does not match 'int (*)(QMetaObject::Call, in= t, void**)' /usr/ports/accessibility/jovie/work/jovie-4.8.3/libkttsd/filterproc.moc= :67: error: 'staticMetaObjectExtraData' was not declared in this scope *** [libkttsd/CMakeFiles/kttsd.dir/filterproc.o] Error code 1 [ 10%] Built target kcm_kttsd_automoc 1 error *** [libkttsd/CMakeFiles/kttsd.dir/all] Error code 2 1 error *** [all] Error code 2 1 error *** [do-build] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/accessibility/jovie. *** [run-depends] Error code 1 How can we help newcomers to avoid this kind of problems? Erich From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 04:20:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006C8106564A for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 04:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@dataix.net) Received: from mail-gh0-f182.google.com (mail-gh0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9788FC0A for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 04:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghbz22 with SMTP id z22so89163ghb.13 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:20:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dataix.net; s=rsa; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=FU1OC3qlw+uMx3GHo2/cnc/qktXpO+W7zVWTewFS7kM=; b=GOiUUTseRBuxCVUGOBToiz/xCmVB3Bau8q13aQ93NH429ltlb7y+8AYhsY9nKq1ibk J655D/4S+gSm91yTMTpMy8isufuyKBBscJDHmtLrPtfaMJezPBrXtzABH4qS7NTynnCL Ps3aFBjhTgzgIpfoAHB2327+QhEoKgKgxShSk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:x-gm-message-state; bh=FU1OC3qlw+uMx3GHo2/cnc/qktXpO+W7zVWTewFS7kM=; b=GRneX6B+3UmDs/4xQq/GSft8eMyVJfsEoYiUgAN4jsqGMZ+D8xZWhFO2DLTkx2z87N faoj0L8RYz4eL86nEGEq40tD2pe9sJLdwIrObry/QBAb/6WT+k1Z5epAd1gx0xkXsQlA 28XdpiUu/um0G6sIlBVaav2wcFr6hM767qkkIMZ6qiX68HT5543/I0xmPk4FfnpH27lV 7526MlChaWxKP41Xs9pGKvIHvPd3hQbHdOcY131x0GuuwLgTAiGQBSfX6RlZyKzdAQYh k4y96Z+Hk2Szeq66q3unAfyu0DW68nB3C/Gt47j31tGhvecVE7pkVsRE4W8dSuymbNJi WQhg== Received: by 10.101.28.33 with SMTP id f33mr6243244anj.76.1339561220125; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:20:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (75-128-120-86.dhcp.aldl.mi.charter.com. [75.128.120.86]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i16sm2812742anm.12.2012.06.12.21.20.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:20:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5D4KGjc016079 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:20:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Received: (from jh@localhost) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5D4KGo7016078; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:20:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:20:16 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal To: Erich Message-ID: <20120613042016.GA3206@DataIX.net> References: <29122915.NDnaqcIOs3@x220.ovitrap.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <29122915.NDnaqcIOs3@x220.ovitrap.com> X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnJiBO99gC+45dSTdEkfOIvyP5qtASuXyNYtsoAWh/EHRdkfxegvUrKqUlinXTvhG1mPI6A Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why are you NOT using FreeBSD --> an example X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 04:20:21 -0000 On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:53:04AM +0700, Erich wrote: > Hi, Hi, Do we really need another one of these pointless rambling threads... >=20 > I placed FreeBSD 10 on an empty disk and downloaded then the ports tree f= rom yesterday. >=20 > /etc/make/conf looks like this: >=20 > # Uncomment this if you want to do port builds with no interaction > #BATCH=3Dyes >=20 > # Keep KDE4 in /usr/local, fixes sharing of icons / mime and others > KDE4_PREFIX=3D/usr/local > # added by use.perl 2012-01-05 20:44:40 > PERL_VERSION=3D5.12.4 > # > # 12.06.12 ed: added to support new Intel KMS. > # > WITH_NEW_XORG=3Dtrue >=20 New user probably would not have gotten to this point... Just sayin. > All the rest is plain default. >=20 > One thing I have to mention as it might is the cause. I used PCBSD to get= FreeBSD onto the machine and upgraded then via sources to 10. >=20 > I extra did not do anything else as I wanted to show how newcomers who ju= st follow 'official' documentation hit a wall during this procedurefree. The below page is not official documentation. It is a wiki, its soley devoted to developers & and those that wish to check the current status and or debug problems. >=20 > I used this page to get information for installing X with Intel KMS suppo= rt: >=20 > http://wiki.freebsd.org/Intel_GPU Read the FAQ ? This whole thread would be better suited to be on x11@ as the FAQ states >=20 > Here is the current status: >=20 > Ports tree downloaded during the day 12.06.12 >=20 > Installation of Joe. >=20 > Joe is always the first port I install as I am used to its commands. I th= en download and compile other ports. As I am currently on a low-bandwidth I= nternet connection, I try to keep the machine busy during the night with la= rge downloads. Irrelevant >=20 > Parallel downloading and compilation of scribus and xorg-server >=20 > This error came from compiling scribus while xorg was still downloading: >=20 > g++ -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -Wall -W -DQT_NO_CAST_FROM_ASCI= I -DQT_NO_CAST_TO_ASCII -DQFORMINTERNAL_NAMESPACE -DQT_KEYWORDS -DQT_NO_DEB= UG -DQT_XML_LIB -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_HAVE_MMX -DQT_HAVE_SSE -DQT= _HAVE_MMXEXT -DQT_HAVE_SSE2 -DQT_HAVE_SSE3 -DQT_HAVE_SSSE3 -D_LARGEFILE64_S= OURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -DQT_SHARED -I/usr/local/share/qt4/mkspecs/freebs= d-g++ -I. -I../../../include/QtUiTools -I../../../include/QtCore -I../../..= /include/QtGui -I../../../include/QtXml -I../../../include -I../shared -I..= /../designer/src/uitools -I../../designer/src/lib/uilib -I.moc/release-shar= ed -I.uic/release-shared -I/usr/local/include/qt4 -I/usr/local/include -o .= obj/release-shared/moc_finddialog.o .moc/release-shared/moc_finddialog.cpp > g++ -Wl,-rpath-link,/usr/ports/devel/qt4-linguist/work/qt-everywhere-open= source-src-4.8.2/lib -Wl,-O1 -pthread -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib/qt4 -Wl,-rp= ath,/usr/local/lib/qt4 -o ../../../bin/linguist-qt4 .obj/release-shared/num= erus.o .obj/release-shared/translator.o .obj/release-shared/translatormes= sage.o .obj/release-shared/qm.o .obj/release-shared/qph.o .obj/release-s= hared/po.o .obj/release-shared/ts.o .obj/release-shared/xliff.o .obj/rel= ease-shared/batchtranslationdialog.o .obj/release-shared/errorsview.o .ob= j/release-shared/finddialog.o .obj/release-shared/formpreviewview.o .obj/= release-shared/globals.o .obj/release-shared/main.o .obj/release-shared/m= ainwindow.o .obj/release-shared/messageeditor.o .obj/release-shared/messa= geeditorwidgets.o .obj/release-shared/messagehighlighter.o .obj/release-s= hared/messagemodel.o .obj/release-shared/phrasebookbox.o .obj/release-sha= red/phrase.o .obj/release-shared/phrasemodel.o .obj/release-shared/phrase= view.o .obj/release-shared/printout.o .obj/release-shared/recentfiles.o = =2Eobj/release-shared/sourcecodeview.o .obj/release-shared/statistics.o .= obj/release-shared/translatedialog.o .obj/release-shared/translationsettin= gsdialog.o .obj/release-shared/simtexth.o .obj/release-shared/moc_batchtr= anslationdialog.o .obj/release-shared/moc_errorsview.o .obj/release-share= d/moc_finddialog.o .obj/release-shared/moc_formpreviewview.o .obj/release= -shared/moc_mainwindow.o .obj/release-shared/moc_messageeditor.o .obj/rel= ease-shared/moc_messageeditorwidgets.o .obj/release-shared/moc_messagehigh= lighter.o .obj/release-shared/moc_messagemodel.o .obj/release-shared/moc_= phrasebookbox.o .obj/release-shared/moc_phrase.o .obj/release-shared/moc_= phrasemodel.o .obj/release-shared/moc_phraseview.o .obj/release-shared/mo= c_recentfiles.o .obj/release-shared/moc_sourcecodeview.o .obj/release-sha= red/moc_statistics.o .obj/release-shared/moc_translatedialog.o .obj/relea= se-shared/moc_translationsettingsdialog.o .obj/release-shared/qrc_linguist= =2Eo -L/usr/ports/devel > .obj/release-shared/mainwindow.o:(.rodata._ZTV19SortedContextsModel[_ZTV1= 9SortedContextsModel]+0xc0): undefined reference to `QAbstractProxyModel::s= etItemData(QModelIndex const&, QMap const&)' > .obj/release-shared/mainwindow.o:(.rodata._ZTV19SortedMessagesModel[_ZTV1= 9SortedMessagesModel]+0xc0): undefined reference to `QAbstractProxyModel::s= etItemData(QModelIndex const&, QMap const&)' > *** [../../../bin/linguist-qt4] Error code 1 > 1 error > *** [first] Error code 2 > 1 error > *** [sub-linguist-make_default] Error code 2 > 4 errors > *** [do-build] Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/qt4-linguist. >=20 > We started to compile xorg-server after the download was finished. >=20 > There was this error message then: >=20 > Requested 'dri >=3D 7.8.0' but version of dri is 7.6.1 >=20 > Obviously, an old version was kept in the ports. >=20 > Later KDE4 failed with >=20 > In file included from /usr/ports/accessibility/jovie/work/jovie-4.8.3/lib= kttsd/filterproc.cpp:153: > /usr/ports/accessibility/jovie/work/jovie-4.8.3/libkttsd/filterproc.moc:4= 7: error: no 'void KttsFilterProc::qt_static_metacall(QObject*, QMetaObject= ::Call, int, void**)' member function declared in class 'KttsFilterProc' > /usr/ports/accessibility/jovie/work/jovie-4.8.3/libkttsd/filterproc.moc:6= 1: error: 'const QMetaObjectExtraData KttsFilterProc::staticMetaObjectExtra= Data' is not a static member of 'class KttsFilterProc' > /usr/ports/accessibility/jovie/work/jovie-4.8.3/libkttsd/filterproc.moc:6= 3: error: argument of type 'void (KttsFilterProc::)(QObject*, QMetaObject::= Call, int, void**)' does not match 'int (*)(QMetaObject::Call, int, void**)' > /usr/ports/accessibility/jovie/work/jovie-4.8.3/libkttsd/filterproc.moc:6= 7: error: 'staticMetaObjectExtraData' was not declared in this scope > *** [libkttsd/CMakeFiles/kttsd.dir/filterproc.o] Error code 1 > [ 10%] Built target kcm_kttsd_automoc > 1 error > *** [libkttsd/CMakeFiles/kttsd.dir/all] Error code 2 > 1 error > *** [all] Error code 2 > 1 error > *** [do-build] Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/accessibility/jovie. > *** [run-depends] Error code 1 >=20 > How can we help newcomers to avoid this kind of problems? >=20 By contributing to PRs and the correct mailing list with solutions, outcomes, patches etc... Part of it made it to this thread under a wrong subject line but its a start... --=20 - (2^(N-1)) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 04:31:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41171106566C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 04:31:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C4A8FC12 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 04:31:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so348440obc.13 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:31:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=PgQaBAYXtcGvnN7jSdnQ7u+shl9OSo8US67jAXwTzBs=; b=x2nbzPVKrvXX64xzyw4KCYUfCmNEJoWSI2RitrTh6dj4HfkbdSUn1z/+XjOsiHx8an a5kBYZ7H2kL3y+QVpQln1jsEzYs/byvjwQVEkru7JoNRqD0R7fE2iyWrouyScWmagPTL yawsxxgjEtV614snQaz7bHvsWhpPk+Lup2/vKQf9fsPogDwLNQXLdUzKS14by1cHgUrB wAK8xKHLsiBlrsQR3xc9N4CnMO8+zW4DvtF/LilW3mmBOiwlhb1TFhxY0g+0cTdBcLfd RanKP4/KtX6cezPa42eVupdHYy9wzV6zvqm/O9yGt1WKEEeA1qstSpGfd2TEPlscrQMd Bfjg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.15.137 with SMTP id x9mr9617379igc.8.1339561914383; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:31:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.101.6 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:31:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120613042016.GA3206@DataIX.net> References: <29122915.NDnaqcIOs3@x220.ovitrap.com> <20120613042016.GA3206@DataIX.net> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 23:31:54 -0500 Message-ID: From: Jeremy Messenger To: Jason Hellenthal Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Erich , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why are you NOT using FreeBSD --> an example X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 04:31:55 -0000 On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:53:04AM +0700, Erich wrote: >> Hi, > > Hi, Do we really need another one of these pointless rambling threads... Do not reply to the thread and it will die quickly. Quiet simple. -- mezz.freebsd@gmail.com - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 04:33:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDD2106566B for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 04:33:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jb.1234abcd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E21C8FC0C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 04:33:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so232801yhg.13 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:33:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dmrSr9anMLp56/q5dcaHT6amNdm15Je9/wyd36jvReU=; b=iEQ7LnhaBeMNjtLp4aub60f9E1MiD/SLI2IZRZQm5YYuXVzdQuFqEf0aaG7zcuC0Mq Tlfn0jhZ0YHt/YvYHgrAP7oz1faAczprOAjGZqYVkgQKC++yQrkm/XwYRTJPAbevEOJ7 PvpcwyoAUCBjADVhNrmao+FVToOSx6BAewCiFvKJxria0LOQcGJbsOLtVp0xdqU9lrqZ qQdUVv1oWObL85lm5qhpKMLpDzWCd5AmfuuUCO8VHMDMaeaRSJmyhe4LltTgMtVuSVqC KipZVPjUmWHinD1pNynUCaTVCh++qKv2yqtW6QHdJxnuUlPJvYrGF/2Fx2qG9MQLwbJB hVMg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.115.193 with SMTP id e41mr32458575yhh.4.1339562027418; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:33:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.146.203.9 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:33:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:33:47 +0200 Message-ID: From: J B To: ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: strace dependency X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 04:33:53 -0000 # pkg_add -r strace Fetching ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9.0-release/Latest/strace.tbz... Done. pkg_add: warning: package 'strace-4.5.18_1' requires 'perl-5.12.4_3', but 'perl-5.12.4_4' is installed From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 08:37:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BE31065676 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:37:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivier@gid0.org) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F4F8FC1E for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:37:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by laai10 with SMTP id i10so267267laa.13 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 01:37:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=cf9KUFvHJAoHPK5m6pibtGnwnocSYwOah5BdfmMUB0Q=; b=NaHuYxhR5+3SnsmRkJcSnBgaMQ+AN9uXOsoOO/+zOp423HWHYF52pBLK4/h7+psHmx W8tuRnn3I4OgHQYt/ook8n6oYHZIagLxzJfbzTsyoT/QaSD2rDD3XyKHeyRzsFvMWgiJ rQ8ohVkIrIM5ZXTmIVA1+J8A2uVZj9txFmjbpe7RTZqD17p6rs0Kb+lG3P9il+t6vDLw oyM2cwYQK7NMbLcNMqx/6LoIsSpBUoEdnqcvGo24a9BFoULQcWhLTDjKalotXjDAPi3e ssHDk3gZxmh3bydNbfneFJUElpdbnsi35C6gS4rTeAQUkLpWisWsiPCmaXzX4PxlflS2 PuqA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.124.141 with SMTP id mi13mr23463821lab.50.1339576651394; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 01:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.100.68 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 01:37:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 10:37:31 +0200 Message-ID: From: Olivier Smedts To: J B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkmhpoynzeV2DzkfLUpZ4PFYZQEHgeQW3i36iR5CE97/xG6tOTYHzXUBs+Hcawh+6edmsbk Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strace dependency X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:37:33 -0000 2012/6/13 J B : > # pkg_add -r strace > Fetching ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9.0-releas= e/Latest/strace.tbz... > Done. > pkg_add: warning: package 'strace-4.5.18_1' requires 'perl-5.12.4_3', > but 'perl-5.12.4_4' is installed USE_PERL5=3D yes # for strace-graph --=20 Olivier Smedts=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=A0 _ =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0= =A0 ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) e-mail: olivier@gid0.org=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 - against HTML email & vCards=A0 X www: http://www.gid0.org=A0 =A0 - against proprietary attachments / \ =A0 "Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : =A0 ceux qui comprennent le binaire, =A0 et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas." From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 09:50:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BFFC106566C; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:50:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5E18FC15; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:50:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id MAA21634; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:50:10 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1SekDJ-000BJD-Dt; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:50:09 +0300 Message-ID: <4FD8624F.6080104@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:50:07 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120503 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=x-viet-vps Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: sanity-config issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:50:18 -0000 In some ports I am getting an error message about how make doesn't know how to make sanity-config after exiting from config menu. I see that there is @${MAKE} sanity-config line at the end of the config target script. I use WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj and I noticed that e.g. in the case of mail/thunderbird port the make command was being run from /usr/obj/usr/ports/mail/thunderbird. My workaround was to prepend "cd ${.CURDIR};" before the make command. I see that this is a popular theme in bsd.port.mk, but I am not sure why it is needed and if my workaround is actually correct. Hope that this is useful. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 10:26:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA991065676 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 10:26:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E89B8FC17 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 10:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by laai10 with SMTP id i10so355634laa.13 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 03:26:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=A+luF+FDuVy6tGoh4u4z1gTV6nWnfil/6o2Y+eoKfnI=; b=efaOvrFFPUuOgFMv1u74OntcCyvkx16ARvTU/8oS4npZ+3xw/mqdyNTqWj7mQE2j4C qUba2jzI/68feMFM2r89yJwHwoMWBO6Os6gLxJrztosTXvuY2NHVLQh3yMxv7zrkyE3j 8tuiC8R0kmYu52q1y/VO6DHDPs02VyZZ6/I6AMinyBG8tZvc05Gs/AmJAS7Vi0lQWolX kR7dPwrbRw22iRMb+3Fao2jTGuIUfig8dFjPdjWcIjVjIW04mpxBh166L0Gr0D4usIIE UwkHRqk8VLlVVcA2XuiEmaAmC7gHjI/Y4rKTR6uw+ftZeVg4nXRx0O77UaO5qw4Ia7dk 5Q9A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.146.67 with SMTP id ta3mr23855246lab.27.1339583217072; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 03:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.30.73 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 03:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.30.73 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 03:26:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:26:56 +0100 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: J B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strace dependency X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 10:26:58 -0000 On Jun 13, 2012 5:34 AM, "J B" wrote: > > # pkg_add -r strace > Fetching ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9.0-release/Latest/strace.tbz. .. > Done. > pkg_add: warning: package 'strace-4.5.18_1' requires 'perl-5.12.4_3', > but 'perl-5.12.4_4' is installed > Only difference between these two versions is the pthread option. Is there a problem when you try to run strace? Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 14:11:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9171065676 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:11:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE758FC16 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id RAA26348 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:11:57 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4FD89FAD.2090007@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:11:57 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120610 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports References: <4F252CFE.3000707@FreeBSD.org> <4F2FC948.9050807@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F2FC948.9050807@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: net/vde2: freebsd10 and gcc 4.6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:11:59 -0000 on 06/02/2012 14:36 Andriy Gapon said the following: > > This seems to still be an issue. This is still an issue. > on 29/01/2012 13:26 Andriy Gapon said the following: >> >> At least on FreeBSD 10 with gcc 4.6 as a ports compiler I need the following >> patch to compile net/vde2: >> --- src/vde_pcapplug.c.orig 2012-01-29 13:06:10.495087022 +0200 >> +++ src/vde_pcapplug.c 2012-01-29 13:11:03.344097090 +0200 >> @@ -32,7 +32,6 @@ >> #include >> #define _GNU_SOURCE >> #include >> -#include >> #include >> >> #include >> @@ -41,8 +40,9 @@ >> #include >> >> #ifdef VDE_FREEBSD >> -#include >> +#include >> #endif >> +#include >> >> #if defined(VDE_DARWIN) || defined(VDE_FREEBSD) >> # if defined HAVE_SYSLIMITS_H >> >> >> Explanation: >> - without including net/bpf.h I get compiler errors for BIOCSHDRCMPLT, >> BIOCIMMEDIATE and BIOCFEEDBACK >> - we don't need sys/socket.h under VDE_FREEBSD, because it is already included >> unconditionally earlier in the file >> - pcap.h inclusion has to be after net/bpf.h, because otherwise pcap/bpf.h >> redefines some definitions from net/bpf.h >> >> P.S. my pcap.h comes from libpcap-1.2.1 > > -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 15:21:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01204106566C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:21:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (xmpp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853628FC19 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5DFLHKL038600 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:21:17 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q5DFLHKL038600 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q5DFLHKL038600; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none Message-ID: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:21:16 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120601 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig896C76CD362983F349EF3C1A" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Subject: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:21:23 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig896C76CD362983F349EF3C1A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear all, After recent mention in this list that UNIQUENAME is not actually a unique name for each port and how obviously non-sensical that is, plus how it causes various problems with OPTIONS processing and how having a proper UNIQUENAME will facilitate the new sub-package functionality currently on the drawing board. So, here are some patches: http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/uniquenames.diff There's also some data on the effect these have on OPTIONSFILE and UNIQUENAME values per port in http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/before/* http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/after/* Summarizing the changes: * UNIQUENAME is now unique per port, and is primarily derived from the port directory name. * Where the port directory name isn't unique (eg. accessibility/orca vs graphics/orca) there is a new UNIQUEPREFIX variable to distinguish the affected ports. This is set for all the LANG specific category ports (arabic, chinese, french, german, hebrew, hungarian, japanese, korean, polish, portuguese, russian, ukranian, vietnamese) to the standard 2 character abbreviation for that LANG. Otherwise it is only set for the specific ports where there is a directory name collision, usually based on the category names. * To avoid accidental non-uniqueness, UNIQUENAME should be treated as a read-only variable by port maintainers. UNIQUEPREFIX should only be set where necessary to resolve conflicts. All instances of ports setting UNIQUENAME have been removed: in the majority of cases, this turned out to be a no-op as the new UNIQUENAME turned out to be the same as what most ports were previously overriding it to. * The way UNIQUENAME is defined means that it doesn't now change depending on the version of python, ruby or apache installed on a machine. * UNIQUENAME will have changed for numerous ports -- consequently port OPTIONFILEs may well have changed location. By default now, each port should have an individual OPTIONFILE location. This has removed a number of accidental cases of different (maybe completely unrelated) ports sharing the same OPTIONSFILE. * If you do want to share the same OPTIONSFILE between several different ports, you can modify OPTIONSFILE directly or there is now a new OPTIONS_DIR variable allowing a simple way for you to override the location: OPTIONSFILE is redefined as: OPTIONSFILE=3D ${PORT_DBDIR}/${OPTIONS_DIR}/options with OPTIONS_DIR defaulting (as before) to UNIQUENAME unless overriden. See databases/postgresql91-server for an example. * Other things that may be affected: ports with USE_LDCONFIG or USE_LDCONFIG32 can have ldconfig data written to a different location. This shouldn't make any user-visible change. Per-port options settings (OPTIONSng-style) in /etc/make.conf may need to be modified. Please test. Comments, corrections and bug reports will be most welcome.= Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig896C76CD362983F349EF3C1A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/Yr+0ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwORQCePinWqvYhthHN7vZzEKhX0Tw/ KioAni4mnkYON/slr8DLFZZYpC2T6DFj =/U6g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig896C76CD362983F349EF3C1A-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 15:26:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8CF10656AC for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:26:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryan@shatow.net) Received: from secure.xzibition.com (secure.xzibition.com [173.160.118.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5948FC20 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:26:04 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=shatow.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sweb; b=0FzTiV VZyRoVYhyH+i/VeZTr19qmkxZsflLpNM/PuE3uZe9BJA1/P9DihZz6bDuAgaty30 F08D8chUWlFWGCwWw7+PHFVxWqCAdGB8YAgzLGaSqN1IwbqBxksifOtewEhwBP5W 56B9jByNPkYFYP4gqwUjr27ewQqwTJVE2aF6Y= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=shatow.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sweb; bh=q0k3uWL9UGra eiGECYqXGTTEVCX14IbM6lAsRfKmuq8=; b=G5Y/bsV4x1KxKG5qy3Ev+H9gsiJ3 OBKZJklWtXjBzdJi/yErOAbPwPKhUOxLYfaTraHlSVjKkOIzjyKItOWU6NkDT4dv BlNSOn+b0EvnB9f7Z1UqscqKTLMiXrwhdI6xKalrDHZk/tm7c3NkhdmKdEwda0n5 baqyizi75qWauao= Received: (qmail 69443 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2012 10:26:00 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.74?) (bryan@shatow.net@74.94.87.209) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 13 Jun 2012 10:26:00 -0500 Message-ID: <4FD8B11B.608@shatow.net> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 10:26:19 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andriy Gapon References: <4FD8624F.6080104@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4FD8624F.6080104@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=x-viet-vps Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , Palle Girgensohn , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sanity-config issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:26:05 -0000 On 6/13/2012 4:50 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > In some ports I am getting an error message about how make doesn't know how to > make sanity-config after exiting from config menu. > I see that there is > @${MAKE} sanity-config > line at the end of the config target script. > > I use WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj and I noticed that e.g. in the case of > mail/thunderbird port the make command was being run from > /usr/obj/usr/ports/mail/thunderbird. > > My workaround was to prepend "cd ${.CURDIR};" before the make command. > I see that this is a popular theme in bsd.port.mk, but I am not sure why it is > needed and if my workaround is actually correct. > > Hope that this is useful. > Andriy, Thank you for identifying the cause of this. Some others have reported it as well but I have been unable to recreate. I'll get a patch/PR submitted to fix. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery bdrewery@freenode/EFNet From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 16:41:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4981065679 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manek@ghur.net) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617F98FC25 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:41:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werg1 with SMTP id g1so780453wer.13 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:41:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:mime-version:x-mailer:thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=odGHRUEKRX7EhS2STdPz48hJpcNnq2+9bg11xyF3pZo=; b=Q7i5wZN/Gh8VFOd55jj7O4XjGWai6+PhYSVvaLSZJ6XQKuXLAd74061rqCZv1ZXwBq 1FYrTMzj2QvGUbEWc/DcXeVxkffPv4ujOPkkPRhQHO07ce/SAGV1kMi6VlfXo3aREG4V fRJraVmoIb9OwO3twR36mAnqqdTfb3LXelMQ5vP7QDQksAP/nveFhOCADKzKMbTpfOZe /GDEbFWpgv34YUB4QT+TGIQ9n67K0y+dWdkHFcejp8uIPaoPV2udQI+//y5p66yQSiui 5ZHKjP88NOArf2h2MB4FPatrU9QmPlXLjgHpL2PX2CAZ0UI3Xutp0E68Oxt6xOw8Sk6s l3uQ== Received: by 10.180.78.197 with SMTP id d5mr10039101wix.7.1339605697089; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:41:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Sameer Manek MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac1Jgz+XVNgW7FkzRJaDwAfpV04Zrg== Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:41:34 -0700 Message-ID: <20c11a27477fd9104878f9869db89379@mail.gmail.com> To: ports@freebsd.org, flz@freebsd.org X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnHThL2aEXE0VLcIoL8fkLfn5IGsIpZkK/5BE6Crk+ZPYrofL7tNbOt0FX9Kskjdey8sKsy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: missing ports maintainer & patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:41:38 -0000 It appears that flz@freebsd.org is no longer involved with maintaining ports that are assigned to that id. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?responsible=flz Can someone at least review and commit the patches in ports/168262 and ports/168263 Thanks Sameer From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 18:00:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D871065672 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:00:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10B98FC0A for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfy7 with SMTP id fy7so623092vcb.13 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:00:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tomjudge.com; s=google; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CrFE6Rdtek8Fs5B0f4tOlpI1CFYjMvI0/by0gGfDn6s=; b=W/OpDMHF6USBOL982HGuA92j74yyqFZm97whOi2CfTQZjBSR9nbcQEXrVKHmJVW+GB wnCfTZpoWfhZwZu87j9xiKUh8XAqQ0T7zoB64Fc9JzNtBQywTLI00hZ0xWYBBrnEvXju H++ZpmMm+S7kyEy5p/bZ7Z8Pg08j0BDTVal6Q= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=CrFE6Rdtek8Fs5B0f4tOlpI1CFYjMvI0/by0gGfDn6s=; b=c8DnkO+6772zS/bzndklvDoYf99RP9GaDe9jQdiprSlfapfxAkBAfBD++Q3GyUck+7 ljmPr/OvnekNJldS4N9MzCnFT3K+dwnd5wp8Ln5j251poz0+c/K1iEIhnwG+R8G8clYV z67sK7DZeSbjgLlVeSeGofghnQKeG9OZHnEQX3Sk6+ZbDgRiV/NSpRlYHB+d9o8eW5QM h1tz54TZsAn/pXr00+iVxgGkbnJ0nivmZtkNbmMHLyaNOzcHJWI1MhAC6EJUuYmyJl39 eIA1O3gaZDRULsqfhnr/BS5N+HGVimnEe9xs2aU2bND0w/rpVOruqLNGRGzbrluYulQo l7TA== Received: by 10.220.209.75 with SMTP id gf11mr17425903vcb.56.1339610442847; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Toms-MacBook-Pro-2.local (sf-nat.sourcefire.com. [64.214.53.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cr4sm2652960vdb.7.2012.06.13.11.00.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:00:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FD8D52C.4060803@tomjudge.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:00:12 -0400 From: Tom Judge User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20120607050351.GA11949@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20120607050351.GA11949@lonesome.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQklJSY1SJej0mGD85sOV6ayC8YTtBafik8wggWBFRYbpREwm7vUKfDALTLMh3KhwmSoLoMb Subject: Re: RFC: ports failing in jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:00:44 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/06/2012 01:03, Mark Linimon wrote: > > As bapt, miwi, and I have been trying to analyze the results of > these runs, we keep tripping over these failures. There are too > many for us to tackle, so we'd like your help. > > I've been trying to collect them on the following page: > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsFailingInJails > > Note that ATM the failures are a moving target, so some of these > failures may have already been fixed. If that is the case, please > make a note of them in the "already fixed" section, so that when > reviewing errorlogs we will know to skip over those. > The devel/svnmerge failure seems to be an FP related to bad resolver configuration. Tom -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP2NUsAAoJEEJSM9yB4iIWrosH/iQ67AIe4QzGNsz6UvBGegDx fikKflhghLpAQUdo3EMOBwRGzlmwQiAfFI1nIA/WjTAkf7RIBCo0fNYBElwVC8WE eKcLQlPMsyw9wRKAStXissZ5VK2MJxU8WXKch3pdRRlRrt9dkcdndrqSZVERtglj 8pO51aOvjBkvAPIfGLSQJcDF84E6VqVBlN/oOvsDbXrV1ooeVazJEZoINX+EAO+A kEj0G+OOUgzWue1Lj3D920w78VI+VNgPEPCG/ryTB+6vdastM6uPRmTyxXQcOv8W EZ2FqUWxtVRjQP6V8siZSR+wDK5S+IQj8fTn2KEk6ReqaVjLV7ynI0ETQJgV6SQ= =i1xw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 18:38:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75041106566B for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:38:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@freebsd.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 414B18FC1D for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AAF6621C0E for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:38:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BE27621C09 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:38:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from usbctlt011.secnap.com (10.70.2.19) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:38:22 -0400 Message-ID: <4FD8DE1E.1090903@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:38:22 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <20c11a27477fd9104878f9869db89379@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20c11a27477fd9104878f9869db89379@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: missing ports maintainer & patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:38:29 -0000 On 6/13/12 12:41 PM, Sameer Manek wrote: > It appears that flz@freebsd.org is no longer involved with maintaining > ports that are assigned to that id. > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?responsible=flz > > > > Can someone at least review and commit the patches in ports/168262 and > ports/168263 for one, both of these partches are corrupted. don't know why, but they are. maybe if the submitter used send-pr -a or an approved method to send the patch in, the maintainer might be able to test it. as it is, what, is he supposed to try to cut/paste, guess at where the whitespace goes? run portlint over and over till he guesses right? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 18:43:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A142106568A; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:43:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0D68FC1A; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id VAA29262; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:43:45 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1SesXh-000Bz0-1P; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:43:45 +0300 Message-ID: <4FD8DF5F.9010103@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:43:43 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120503 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=X-VIET-VPS Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: conflicts message is broken with pkgng X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:43:48 -0000 ===> libexttextcat-3.2.0_2 conflicts with installed package(s): They install files into the same place. Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). *** [check-install-conflicts] Error code 1 Cause: for entry in ${conflicts_with}; do echo " ${found}"; done ${found} vs ${entry} -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 19:31:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C0A1065670; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1117F8FC15; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:31:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590E87E876; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:31:03 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4FD8EA75.20305@acsalaska.net> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:31:01 +0200 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block References: <4F578AA7.4060008@FreeBSD.org> <4F990D9A.3090100@FreeBSD.org> <4FA643FA.3050206@FreeBSD.org> <4FAB6E01.50108@FreeBSD.org> <4FAC2EC1.8040708@FreeBSD.org> <20120517014743.GB5348@lonesome.com> <4FBFF63D.7010404@acsalaska.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chris Rees , Mark Linimon , Scot Hetzel , Andriy Gapon , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UID/GID_OFFSET (Was: Re: WITH_GCC) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:31:06 -0000 On 12-6-2012 2:38, Warren Block wrote: > On Fri, 25 May 2012, Mel Flynn wrote: > >> On 20-5-2012 14:06, Chris Rees wrote: >> >>> Usually. Sometimes it's (ab)used to include the relevant bsd.*.mk >>> file without adding dependencies (WANT_GNOME), but normally that's >>> what WANT_ is used for. >>> >>> Definitely add a warning that if you want to use a WANT_ variable you >>> should also check the relevant Mk/ files to check for syntax. >> >> What's also not consistent is the use of: >> USE_FOO= 42+ >> which is shorthand for: >> USE_FOO= yes >> WANT_FOO_VER= 42+ >> >> Anyway, since Warren is on the job, on one of my travels through pmk, I >> turned a corner and met these totally awesome user settable variables: >> UID_OFFSET >> GID_OFFSET >> >> No docs on them in pmk itself or share/examples/etc/make.conf. What they >> do is add the specified number to the UID and GID that a port defines by >> using /usr/ports/{UIDS,GIDS}. This is extremely useful if you are using >> multiple jails on one machine and don't want the uid's to clash (shared >> memory for example). >> It's also useful, if you have different providers for uid/gid >> information through the use of NSS modules. Knowing that ports won't >> ever get into your "module range" makes you sleep better. >> Example in /etc/make.conf >> UID_OFFSET= 20000 >> GID_OFFSET= ${UID_OFFSET} # best to keep them equal >> >> Installing for example postgresql, will now use uid/gid 20070 instead >> of 70. > > Okay, I've finally cleared some room to work on this; sorry about the > delay. > > My main question is where to add these descriptions. Should they go in > existing sections where possible? Or are we talking about a new > section, and if so, where? At the end of the Dependencies section? Ideally in man7/ports.7, but I see that is quite outdated. It shouldn't be in the porters handbook. The variables are useful for end users. The handbook maybe? -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 20:34:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBF310657E7 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:34:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B04A8FC0C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5DK5Kjq037658 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:05:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5DK5KkU037657 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:05:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:05:20 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120613200520.GA37646@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: [PATCH] Fix vtk-python port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:34:24 -0000 --- Makefile 2012-06-09 02:25:25.000000000 -0700 +++ Makefile.new 2012-06-13 12:12:26.000000000 -0700 @@ -15,8 +15,6 @@ tcl84:${PORTSDIR}/lang/tcl84 \ tk84:${PORTSDIR}/x11-toolkits/tk84 -BROKEN= does not build - MASTERDIR= ${.CURDIR}/../vtk WRAP= Python @@ -41,8 +39,9 @@ -DZLIB_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=/usr/include \ -DJPEG_LIBRARY:PATH=${LOCALBASE}/lib/libjpeg.so \ -DJPEG_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=${LOCALBASE}/include \ - -DPNG_LIBRARY:PATH=${LOCALBASE}/lib/libpng.so \ + -DPNG_LIBRARY:PATH=${LOCALBASE}/lib/libpng15.so \ -DPNG_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=${LOCALBASE}/include/libpng15 \ + -DPNG_PNG_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=${LOCALBASE}/include/libpng15 \ -DTIFF_LIBRARY:PATH=${LOCALBASE}/lib/libtiff.so \ -DTIFF_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=${LOCALBASE}/include \ -DTCL_INCLUDE_PATH:PATH=${TCL_INCLUDE_DIR} \ -- Steve From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 20:36:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21DA106566B for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:36:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from fsm2.ukr.net (fsm2.ukr.net [195.214.192.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF468FC1F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:36:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=fsm; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=wt+oykGkVBXlsp3NaosYHw3GsljAPlYk/f/cjDNG4nU=; b=TQikL1EMmHeF/lcDvb2dGM+jB+FU3hf5IdoUGrKhWPIpiBfmmnraJ+qsWg9j/OcHMVBGbZaNvtDE/Y854a0MDkbX6y8Tw2rcBUTY8yIwgMVkURBac0Na1h6izpuNkm50IyLmU+fEWJZEKNvYm/okfwgEAdzMKlxBlKQJl/crJrU=; Received: from [178.137.138.140] (helo=nonamehost) by fsm2.ukr.net with esmtpsa ID 1Set4b-000GUE-Qr ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:17:45 +0300 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:17:45 +0300 From: Ivan Klymenko To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120613221745.23cdf52d@nonamehost> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bapt@freebsd.org, dan@langille.org Subject: pkg is segmentation fault with of the cross-compile port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:36:39 -0000 Hi all! I building the packages of ports in the chroot system FreeBSD 9.0 i386 the parent system FreeBSD 9.0 amd64. pkg is segmentation fault in port devel/libtool. full trace obtained a pkg.core file is here http://privatepaste.com/2c66b1204f ports tree in a chroot - updated today Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 20:43:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027371065672 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:43:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de [217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5468FC26 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:43:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p5796D799.dip.t-dialin.net [87.150.215.153]) by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1EC97844F05; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:28:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from unknown (IO.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.12]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CF8212D1; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:28:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=leidinger.net; s=outgoing-alex; t=1339615708; bh=dZFpUMp6MPLvMlBdMYqrenSYsVdmD1Mk9hwYMJA8zEs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=hZhJL7LcDFoo0JFeZCBPAft8gVjUvAnrxkyMrl/Doylu7PBrcwFXnysSe7o1nn1zQ QlYFNhLcjj7aIYDn3xAr+w06ibiw9d6VVteVerhPop1OdgqfF+5tUrMLUoi636KXsY bFoXTLN40vItpLOj4uSxQ+Dz40d//vltniiHSCl7JgjqjvIXLxSvsFC0ulj5QL3jL+ MLYXHpTb2BIkk+HT35wv+pb3hfE8dJW5gaTseCfw+nFoTF8Kh8UjkjVaP9+KF8LxhC 595JvWzC1VG8thP5n1G/9GdXUWkVUT0e/jnu4UmCayOLRFdAOSdF4tRKm/4zCwnN+y xDtx3z2dxxC2g== Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:28:26 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Baptiste Daroussin Message-ID: <20120613212826.00000bd4@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20120611131222.GW60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120611073017.GT60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD5E522.4020506@gmail.com> <20120611131222.GW60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10cvs42 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: 1EC97844F05.AFDA8 X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-0.921, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, AWL 0.19, DKIM_SIGNED 0.10, DKIM_VALID -0.10, DKIM_VALID_AU -0.10, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD -0.01) X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1340220511.611@oqGH90LgX4Socka6U3RF/w X-EBL-Spam-Status: No Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Eitan Adler , Vitaly Magerya Subject: Re: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:43:55 -0000 On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:12:22 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Plus ${ORIGIN}_${SUBPACKAGE} is fragile because you can have a port > which is: lang/mylang with a subpackage bla which will give > lang/mylang_bla and a port lang/mylang_bla with no subpackage which > will give lang/mylang_bla Chose a delimiter which is unlikely to show up in a portname, ore use e.g. 4 underscores. The generic idea is not bad, you just have to find a suitable delimiter, and IMO it doesn't matter if it is ugly (like ____), or not. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 20:52:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 552FB1065670 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:52:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF428FC19 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so1064933bkv.13 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:52:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sCu1T1L7z66LkyC97DH4/GDz04zFsXxdTRCHx6AKvNU=; b=MJatiAiHKOfCvgCLG2yZxu8/9ik+b9D/q2Sr6OG1Ir1nTUggJSEwJMZ2E/FgUbP2RE lZaDs5rgZdrMA6OKNKf/ysxdowBRPJ1fZr4gVHo3Tj1Hxy1zwtWNKu2zGQhLZg2jeNBB rJtO8KKqxdU3kU4moHDBg5JvfyhqiZpSEcEwcAFABbIEBGY4HvvjOOe/kdiShuD1ZMin zFJ+ZWNlmJGvIctOblz+DaVBWyu9G//xTd5Fm2GgCpPd8FrgVQe7gG3ugOF4IrEgSqcV B47qE0HYTiz7g3PXrZRJeg0DFMux3KRjUJbjxfSTcFFZ/mrsMc4GEn5NRsTENqW4N+OK HpfA== Received: by 10.204.154.214 with SMTP id p22mr13780083bkw.115.1339620747848; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:52:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.171.138 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:51:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120613200520.GA37646@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20120613200520.GA37646@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> From: Chris Rees Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:51:57 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1jwgBmXQzVAJ9Xhdly2cZWh01OE Message-ID: To: Steve Kargl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix vtk-python port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:52:29 -0000 On 13 June 2012 21:05, Steve Kargl wrote= : > > --- Makefile =A0 =A02012-06-09 02:25:25.000000000 -0700 > +++ Makefile.new =A0 =A0 =A0 =A02012-06-13 12:12:26.000000000 -0700 > @@ -15,8 +15,6 @@ > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0tcl84:${PORTSDIR}/lang/tcl84 \ > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0tk84:${PORTSDIR}/x11-toolkits/tk84 > > -BROKEN=3D =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0does not build > - > =A0MASTERDIR=3D =A0 =A0 ${.CURDIR}/../vtk > > =A0WRAP=3D =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Python > @@ -41,8 +39,9 @@ > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-DZLIB_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=3D/usr/include \ > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-DJPEG_LIBRARY:PATH=3D${LOCALBASE}/lib/lib= jpeg.so \ > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-DJPEG_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=3D${LOCALBASE}/inc= lude \ > - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 -DPNG_LIBRARY:PATH=3D${LOCALBASE}/lib/libpn= g.so \ > + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 -DPNG_LIBRARY:PATH=3D${LOCALBASE}/lib/libpn= g15.so \ > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-DPNG_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=3D${LOCALBASE}/incl= ude/libpng15 \ > + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 -DPNG_PNG_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=3D${LOCALBASE}/i= nclude/libpng15 \ > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-DTIFF_LIBRARY:PATH=3D${LOCALBASE}/lib/lib= tiff.so \ > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-DTIFF_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=3D${LOCALBASE}/inc= lude \ > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-DTCL_INCLUDE_PATH:PATH=3D${TCL_INCLUDE_DI= R} \ I'm testing this now. Please send a PR next time to avoid multiple people checking the patch. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 20:59:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960101065686; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:59:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A938FC1A; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfy7 with SMTP id fy7so772459vcb.13 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:59:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wkYWFdc0hEcRcZQYnQWkktLJT6sQQRs1ayxCD6XqX1Q=; b=xKysWgTeqZ2NTv6bEEwRA5ToHeaba1rXEprnwZxnOKU+3HeKhjE9NyR5ZozIaNIz9r xj9LRG8x1UTR+Mp2xEkB6Jts3w/iiOgTorQP/860200D5x0TNImYR8Z6pl78GYxJM/fx Y0Y+sM61QKCgnhUgYBGSVJ7dpTu521f4Frc507IPeyQU/hgoFL0U3yCHLI4UBUw8aEDM t7Ju5uS7Ffp8TMf/HCcj2N2fpB3Uq2FSiX0qvnMmywr3Bcg3LEoiYyvnIXb7IJf3PDr/ GRwnmnSJUSvWM2x+Aukb1M/qOnK78bhpzR7susBaYnT1EmEKCXvurG9NHhXvYmfyeOGt AuzQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.153.136 with SMTP id k8mr4948928vcw.38.1339621173583; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:59:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.18.139 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:59:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:59:33 +0200 Message-ID: From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML , demon@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: p5-Locale-gettext fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:59:34 -0000 What's wrong with devel/p5-Locale-gettext all of a sudden? root@kg-v7# portinstall -R p5-Locale-gettext [Gathering depends for devel/p5-Locale-gettext ..... done] ---> Installing 'p5-Locale-gettext-1.05_3' from a port (devel/p5-Locale-gettext) ---> Building '/usr/ports/devel/p5-Locale-gettext' ===> Cleaning for p5-Locale-gettext-1.05_3 ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE ===> Extracting for p5-Locale-gettext-1.05_3 => SHA256 Checksum OK for gettext-1.05.tar.gz. ===> p5-Locale-gettext-1.05_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.10.1 - found ===> Patching for p5-Locale-gettext-1.05_3 ===> p5-Locale-gettext-1.05_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.10.1 - found ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for p5-Locale-gettext-1.05_3 ===> p5-Locale-gettext-1.05_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.10.1 - found ===> p5-Locale-gettext-1.05_3 depends on shared library: intl - found ===> Configuring for p5-Locale-gettext-1.05_3 checking for gettext... no checking for gettext in -L/usr/local/lib -lintl -I/usr/local/include... yes checking for dgettext in -L/usr/local/lib -lintl -I/usr/local/include... yes checking for ngettext in -L/usr/local/lib -lintl -I/usr/local/include... yes checking for bind_textdomain_codeset in -L/usr/local/lib -lintl -I/usr/local/include... yes Writing Makefile for Locale::gettext ===> Building for p5-Locale-gettext-1.05_3 cp gettext.pm blib/lib/Locale/gettext.pm /usr/local/bin/perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.10.1/ExtUtils/xsubpp -typemap /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.10.1/ExtUtils/typemap gettext.xs > gettext.xsc && mv gettext.xsc gettext.c Please specify prototyping behavior for gettext.xs (see perlxs manual) cc -c -I/usr/local/include -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -DVERSION=\"1.05\" -DXS_VERSION=\"1.05\" -DPIC -fPIC "-I/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.10.1/mach/CORE" gettext.c gettext.c: In function 'boot_Locale__gettext': gettext.c:368: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See for instructions. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/p5-Locale-gettext/work/gettext-1.05. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/p5-Locale-gettext. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portinstall20120613-28920-gbp3yf-0 env make ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! devel/p5-Locale-gettext (segmentation fault) Latest ports (updated today), running on root@kg-v7# uname -a FreeBSD kg-v7.kg4.no 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #7: Sat Jul 9 23:00:31 CEST 2011 root@kg-v7.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 HTH -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 21:04:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAB61065672 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:04:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from florent.thoumie@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC87E8FC19 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:04:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so1075361bkv.13 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:04:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SfjmK6KFy/eKcVoSjGGu7FRAYWenF43wPQ5BLwcOwic=; b=f12gkNM1UfJK71j0a1bCugO3F6d+eHnbOZaJoxxa+A/H4jUaW6W7Uk4tFlXn9YXfaJ XtnGt1CklscuXE6O8eGf/oaBkS1IzkZ8jsC82fSVYnLd/WW6IPx3NF9WJ0zkOwh83CkN lhXUsNMJy9nSANufx7xUxjMroeBZiALclS93EewLMmcrjCpiYLOF7FLzo98JxAUHK9oI Iv0jNUzLYKYuXnA4KcPTAboLgnxDJRSP93AezfNHega53RQxHjUI3nDgQa8JtXKIuSjI GARtRfMKLoBL830ZliRr9lV/bPsUJ1D+7u5AuFsubXTBM1UCCEkJf1w8R2LRtCRCVHo/ O+PQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.152.132 with SMTP id g4mr14835857bkw.88.1339621480013; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:04:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: florent.thoumie@gmail.com Received: by 10.205.116.145 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:04:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20c11a27477fd9104878f9869db89379@mail.gmail.com> References: <20c11a27477fd9104878f9869db89379@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:04:39 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7-fHRAR9os1Kftx9P5YbQEEPk-w Message-ID: From: Florent Thoumie To: Sameer Manek Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: missing ports maintainer & patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:04:41 -0000 On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Sameer Manek wrote: > It appears that flz@freebsd.org is no longer involved with maintaining ports > that are assigned to that id. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?responsible=flz > > Can someone at least review and commit the patches in ports/168262 and > ports/168263 I'm still involved. I'll try to deal with the updates tomorrow, sorry for the delay. -- Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 21:16:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0743C10656DB for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:16:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727398FC18 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:16:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so1085841bkv.13 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:16:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/Bp6YJm2GAC2q8wUXztwEk1R4bU6+cdgxTGL2DrTHXo=; b=B1x0dYRU4aDVYsU6pFnNg98qkx0/JL3Jy5wJP5HsQRiE9EkUiwPxIQIaH6i2oyqSJB +tfkSrYNynkT3UxsgwBqvSLfi9PfEzgL2p9yDMD1oIW4WU1ajItsztdZjRbMcvjXSm5j 8/FX/FkGyTpccywfK2QoN+LJqd7mazC9FI1GJq04MaQeTujIS/RmKaCetCYAemDMGgOD ZaF/SKqT68+txmQirKnqlboRPqNJEi1ABGYnWj5MhUtdkWTUUQ1KCv2qqBH8hgXCxpb/ VfRh0GsyMC+PwKZVMwRZCEbGbmvWJJ47riuV5o4IX9orJ18lf/s6Zik2HROToQgqIwPM qgXA== Received: by 10.204.152.196 with SMTP id h4mr11909840bkw.131.1339622211441; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:16:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.171.138 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:16:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120613200520.GA37646@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> From: Chris Rees Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:16:21 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: mkLIvHnKmyoRNK0oJDOGC-ZTxI8 Message-ID: To: Steve Kargl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix vtk-python port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:16:53 -0000 On 13 June 2012 21:51, Chris Rees wrote: > On 13 June 2012 21:05, Steve Kargl wro= te: >> >> --- Makefile =A0 =A02012-06-09 02:25:25.000000000 -0700 >> +++ Makefile.new =A0 =A0 =A0 =A02012-06-13 12:12:26.000000000 -0700 >> @@ -15,8 +15,6 @@ >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0tcl84:${PORTSDIR}/lang/tcl84 \ >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0tk84:${PORTSDIR}/x11-toolkits/tk84 >> >> -BROKEN=3D =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0does not build >> - >> =A0MASTERDIR=3D =A0 =A0 ${.CURDIR}/../vtk >> >> =A0WRAP=3D =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Python >> @@ -41,8 +39,9 @@ >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-DZLIB_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=3D/usr/include \ >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-DJPEG_LIBRARY:PATH=3D${LOCALBASE}/lib/li= bjpeg.so \ >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-DJPEG_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=3D${LOCALBASE}/in= clude \ >> - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 -DPNG_LIBRARY:PATH=3D${LOCALBASE}/lib/libp= ng.so \ >> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 -DPNG_LIBRARY:PATH=3D${LOCALBASE}/lib/libp= ng15.so \ >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-DPNG_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=3D${LOCALBASE}/inc= lude/libpng15 \ >> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 -DPNG_PNG_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=3D${LOCALBASE}/= include/libpng15 \ >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-DTIFF_LIBRARY:PATH=3D${LOCALBASE}/lib/li= btiff.so \ >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-DTIFF_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=3D${LOCALBASE}/in= clude \ >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-DTCL_INCLUDE_PATH:PATH=3D${TCL_INCLUDE_D= IR} \ > > I'm testing this now. > > Please send a PR next time to avoid multiple people checking the patch. Committed. Thanks! Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 21:18:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79515106564A for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:18:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de [217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A878FC08 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:18:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p5796D799.dip.t-dialin.net [87.150.215.153]) by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63BD0844F05; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:23:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from unknown (IO.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.12]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A425A12D0; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:23:46 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=leidinger.net; s=outgoing-alex; t=1339615426; bh=yl7iCKnxwrxyqS7E/0Xh5ymZdzLScqZE2uqgY3SIF78=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=pYwxZBq+/sZCwAaYn3jIAgClBlC+oYCLztHvcxlRjaj0OTcZ12XWTfuxW2siECRkC FCajq9zwcxN+s4iPja7aVnQtkme/TomAUhy792Cid/NyE6w34fX0ekbYkK3bqOkksO xDWfo9vPzEBQI2ycvJNtuqvqTJoCQ1aZpG3EI1oeO+BT/n0L31Nb8DxQVFb9C8RWz7 7irN4CxzXfuDhh/0uKMY+tqZ2nYiFSv1UAI4dd6uDwNhu7Zsjjhg7qtGh5IfMQmY/3 4JmBkQX11MwyWXz2wpOoYPPS/NzCdjRhPE4fl85WgvaBayV+uMI0tA+fn1PhlVMePl SVEGr8OX6EO5w== Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:23:44 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Baptiste Daroussin Message-ID: <20120613212344.000020ba@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20120611115529.GV60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD591DF.3060808@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611103221.GU60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD5D7B8.9080504@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611115529.GV60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10cvs42 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: 63BD0844F05.A0F60 X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-0.919, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, AWL 0.19, DKIM_SIGNED 0.10, DKIM_VALID -0.10, DKIM_VALID_AU -0.10, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD -0.01) X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1340220229.61561@1z4zZENekO1veaG5Yvn63Q X-EBL-Spam-Status: No Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:18:54 -0000 On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:55:29 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > second problem is that uniquename can potentially be shared between > ports for example nginx and nginx-devel and in general all the -devel > ports Are you sure the user always wants to share options between both? What if they have different options? Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 21:18:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79864106566C; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:18:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34DE98FC1F; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:18:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5DLIrFj051820; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:18:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5DLIrLp051819; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:18:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:18:53 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Chris Rees Message-ID: <20120613211853.GA51802@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20120613200520.GA37646@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix vtk-python port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:18:54 -0000 On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:16:21PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > On 13 June 2012 21:51, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 13 June 2012 21:05, Steve Kargl wrote: > >> > >> --- Makefile    2012-06-09 02:25:25.000000000 -0700 > >> +++ Makefile.new        2012-06-13 12:12:26.000000000 -0700 > >> @@ -15,8 +15,6 @@ > >>                tcl84:${PORTSDIR}/lang/tcl84 \ > >>                tk84:${PORTSDIR}/x11-toolkits/tk84 > >> > >> -BROKEN=                does not build > >> - > >>  MASTERDIR=     ${.CURDIR}/../vtk > >> > >>  WRAP=          Python > >> @@ -41,8 +39,9 @@ > >>                -DZLIB_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=/usr/include \ > >>                -DJPEG_LIBRARY:PATH=${LOCALBASE}/lib/libjpeg.so \ > >>                -DJPEG_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=${LOCALBASE}/include \ > >> -               -DPNG_LIBRARY:PATH=${LOCALBASE}/lib/libpng.so \ > >> +               -DPNG_LIBRARY:PATH=${LOCALBASE}/lib/libpng15.so \ > >>                -DPNG_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=${LOCALBASE}/include/libpng15 \ > >> +               -DPNG_PNG_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=${LOCALBASE}/include/libpng15 \ > >>                -DTIFF_LIBRARY:PATH=${LOCALBASE}/lib/libtiff.so \ > >>                -DTIFF_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=${LOCALBASE}/include \ > >>                -DTCL_INCLUDE_PATH:PATH=${TCL_INCLUDE_DIR} \ > > > > I'm testing this now. > > > > Please send a PR next time to avoid multiple people checking the patch. > > Committed. Thanks! > > Chris You're welcome. -- Steve From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 21:34:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DAA61065673; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:34:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41BF8FC1E; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:34:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBEFB3.dip.t-dialin.net [93.203.239.179]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q5DLYQM4081561; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:34:27 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5DLYJ6n056251; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:34:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5DLY4FP021994; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:34:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Received: (from jhs@localhost) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id q5DLXWqZ021993; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:33:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:33:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <201206132133.q5DLXWqZ021993@fire.js.berklix.net> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org From: "Julian H. Stacey" X-send-pr-version: 3.113 X-GNATS-Notify: Cc: ports@freebsd.org, "Julian H. Stacey" , faust64@gmail.com Subject: Add CONFLICTS_INSTALL=fusefs-ntfs to sysutils/ntfsprogs/Makefile X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Julian H. Stacey" List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:34:29 -0000 >Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator: Julian H. Stacey >Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Linux Unix Consultancy, Munich/Muenchen. >Confidential: no >Synopsis: Add CONFLICTS_INSTALL=fusefs-ntfs to sysutils/ntfsprogs/Makefile >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: ports >Class: change-request >Release: FreeBSD current >Environment: System: FreeBSD fire.js.berklix.net 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #0: Thu Jun 2 23:10:13 CEST 2011 jhs@blak.js.berklix.net:/ad6s4/release/8.2-RELEASE/src/sys/amd64/compile/FIRE64.small amd64 >Description: Please add to: sysutils/ntfsprogs/Makefile This: CONFLICTS_INSTALL= fusefs-ntfs-* To match: ports/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs/Makefile with: CONFLICTS_INSTALL= ntfsprogs-* >How-To-Repeat: Observe clashing deliverables: cd /pub/FreeBSD/branches/-current/ports/sysutils cat fusefs-ntfs/pkg-plist ntfsprogs/pkg-plist | sort | uniq -d bin/ntfscat bin/ntfscluster bin/ntfscmp bin/ntfsfix bin/ntfsinfo bin/ntfsls sbin/mkntfs sbin/ntfsclone sbin/ntfscp sbin/ntfslabel sbin/ntfsresize sbin/ntfsundelete >Fix: Apply diff -c patch (copy below & at URL: http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/ports/gen/sysutils/ntfsprogs/ ------- *** 8.3-RELEASE-and-current/sysutils/ntfsprogs/Makefile.orig Wed Jun 13 23:16:35 2012 --- new/sysutils/ntfsprogs/Makefile Wed Jun 13 23:23:01 2012 *************** *** 15,20 **** --- 15,21 ---- COMMENT= Utilities and library to manipulate NTFS partitions BUILD_DEPENDS= fusefs-libs>2.5:${PORTSDIR}/sysutils/fusefs-libs + CONFLICTS_INSTALL= fusefs-ntfs-* USE_GNOME= pkgconfig USE_BZIP2= yes ------------ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 21:55:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4451065672 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:55:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1283B8FC19; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:55:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5DLttBd056022; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:55:55 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5DLttuq056021; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:55:55 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@freebsd.org using -f Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:55:53 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Subbsd Message-ID: <20120613215553.GR60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LZ92CUgs0ha736zO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: dan@langille.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkgng detect conflict between bacula-server and bacula-client ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:55:56 -0000 --LZ92CUgs0ha736zO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:57:44PM +0400, Subbsd wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Ive try to use pkgng ( WITH_PKGNG=3Dyes ) for build new environment and > got failed: > ... > =3D=3D=3D> Registering installation for bacula-server-5.2.6 > Installing bacula-server-5.2.6...pkg: bacula-server-5.2.6 conflicts > with bacula-client-5.2.6 (installs files into the same place). > Problematic file: /usr/local/man/man8/bacula-fd.8.gz > *** Error code 3 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-server. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-server. >=20 > =3D=3D=3D>>> Installation of bacula-server-5.2.6 (sysutils/bacula-server)= failed > =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update >=20 > =3D=3D=3D>>> Update for sysutils/bacula-server failed > =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update >=20 > Terminated > ... >=20 > As i see, /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-client/Makefile use > /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-server/Makefile. And this looks like > bacula-fd.8.gz should be in Makefile or in case(WITH_CLIENT_ONLY) > constructions because file relating to *-client port. However, > bacula-fd.8.gz will appear in any case with installation of *-server > part too: > .. >=20 > .if defined(WITH_CLIENT_ONLY) > MAN8=3D bacula-fd.8 bconsole.8 > EXTRA_PATCHES+=3D ${FILESDIR}/extra__manpages__Makefile.in > .else > MAN1=3D bat.1 bsmtp.1 bacula-tray-monitor.1 bacula-bwxc= onsole.1 > MAN8=3D bacula.8 bacula-dir.8 bacula-fd.8 bacula-sd.8 > bconsole.8 \ > bcopy.8 bextract.8 bls.8 bregex.8 bscan.8 btape.8= \ > btraceback.8 bwild.8 dbcheck.8 > .. >=20 > In this case the logic is broken and I should register PR to a bacula > maintainer for spliting conflict files or such situation is normal and > isn't considered by pkgng? the bug is in bacula the man page should only be provide once btw bacula-fd= is only provided by the client, the man page should only be installed with the client. regards, Bapt --LZ92CUgs0ha736zO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/ZDGkACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ew2sQCgoExOrPjhFDcuBFyEV4FaTaZu u9kAnic0y23MQb97HBMIMoKLWm3OMUH3 =vRpI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LZ92CUgs0ha736zO-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 22:10:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4050E1065679 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:10:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121868FC0A; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5DMAki5070012; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:10:46 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5DMAkHJ069924; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:10:46 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@freebsd.org using -f Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:10:43 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Ivan Klymenko Message-ID: <20120613221043.GS60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120613221745.23cdf52d@nonamehost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7ufiXnXZuEWu9ktD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120613221745.23cdf52d@nonamehost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: dan@langille.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg is segmentation fault with of the cross-compile port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:10:48 -0000 --7ufiXnXZuEWu9ktD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:17:45PM +0300, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > Hi all! >=20 > I building the packages of ports in the chroot system FreeBSD 9.0 i386 > the parent system FreeBSD 9.0 amd64. > pkg is segmentation fault in port devel/libtool. >=20 > full trace obtained a pkg.core file is here > http://privatepaste.com/2c66b1204f >=20 > ports tree in a chroot - updated today >=20 > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Wow strange I did a lot of tests in chroot for building ports (i386 chroot = on amd64 host) and it always work like a charm. The failure you have also seems to come from a -a argument of pkg register = which is unused and will disappear from next version of pkgng. Can you send the the manifest (should in the ${WORKDIR}/.metadir/+MANIFEST please? regards, Bapt --7ufiXnXZuEWu9ktD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/ZD+MACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzW4gCgkiwB+fQm38u3B20UQUEWj6el 7zoAn3f+0mr1+rjwjQ6F93Ek/RkecXag =AWzU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7ufiXnXZuEWu9ktD-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 22:43:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A0E106564A; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:43:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA3D8FC08; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5DMhavw012021; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:43:36 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q5DMhaw5012018; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:43:36 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:43:36 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Mel Flynn In-Reply-To: <4FD8EA75.20305@acsalaska.net> Message-ID: References: <4F578AA7.4060008@FreeBSD.org> <4F990D9A.3090100@FreeBSD.org> <4FA643FA.3050206@FreeBSD.org> <4FAB6E01.50108@FreeBSD.org> <4FAC2EC1.8040708@FreeBSD.org> <20120517014743.GB5348@lonesome.com> <4FBFF63D.7010404@acsalaska.net> <4FD8EA75.20305@acsalaska.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:43:36 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Chris Rees , Mark Linimon , Scot Hetzel , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: UID/GID_OFFSET (Was: Re: WITH_GCC) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:43:40 -0000 On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Mel Flynn wrote: > On 12-6-2012 2:38, Warren Block wrote: >> On Fri, 25 May 2012, Mel Flynn wrote: >> >>> On 20-5-2012 14:06, Chris Rees wrote: >>> >>>> Usually. Sometimes it's (ab)used to include the relevant bsd.*.mk >>>> file without adding dependencies (WANT_GNOME), but normally that's >>>> what WANT_ is used for. >>>> >>>> Definitely add a warning that if you want to use a WANT_ variable you >>>> should also check the relevant Mk/ files to check for syntax. >>> >>> What's also not consistent is the use of: >>> USE_FOO= 42+ >>> which is shorthand for: >>> USE_FOO= yes >>> WANT_FOO_VER= 42+ >>> >>> Anyway, since Warren is on the job, on one of my travels through pmk, I >>> turned a corner and met these totally awesome user settable variables: >>> UID_OFFSET >>> GID_OFFSET >>> >>> No docs on them in pmk itself or share/examples/etc/make.conf. What they >>> do is add the specified number to the UID and GID that a port defines by >>> using /usr/ports/{UIDS,GIDS}. This is extremely useful if you are using >>> multiple jails on one machine and don't want the uid's to clash (shared >>> memory for example). >>> It's also useful, if you have different providers for uid/gid >>> information through the use of NSS modules. Knowing that ports won't >>> ever get into your "module range" makes you sleep better. >>> Example in /etc/make.conf >>> UID_OFFSET= 20000 >>> GID_OFFSET= ${UID_OFFSET} # best to keep them equal >>> >>> Installing for example postgresql, will now use uid/gid 20070 instead >>> of 70. >> >> Okay, I've finally cleared some room to work on this; sorry about the >> delay. >> >> My main question is where to add these descriptions. Should they go in >> existing sections where possible? Or are we talking about a new >> section, and if so, where? At the end of the Dependencies section? > > Ideally in man7/ports.7, but I see that is quite outdated. It shouldn't > be in the porters handbook. The variables are useful for end users. The > handbook maybe? I understood this to be definitions of the WITH_, USE_, and WANT_ variables in the Porter's Handbook to help maintainers understand when they should use which style. The UID/GID_OFFSET variables should possibly be a separate thing. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 23:45:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D9BF106566C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:45:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3EFE8FC12 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x220.ovitrap.com ([122.129.201.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q5DNj3lF028948; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:45:04 -0600 From: Erich To: Jason Hellenthal Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 06:44:53 +0700 Message-ID: <1443905.ZHsCDgXC9N@x220.ovitrap.com> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.3 (Linux/3.3.7-1.fc16.x86_64; KDE/4.8.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20120613042016.GA3206@DataIX.net> References: <29122915.NDnaqcIOs3@x220.ovitrap.com> <20120613042016.GA3206@DataIX.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why are you NOT using FreeBSD --> an example and a solution X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:45:07 -0000 Hi, On 13 June 2012 0:20:16 Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:53:04AM +0700, Erich wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi, Do we really need another one of these pointless rambling threads... if it helps to keep newcomers with FreeBSD. > > > > > I placed FreeBSD 10 on an empty disk and downloaded then the ports tree from yesterday. > > > > > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/Intel_GPU > > Read the FAQ ? The problem has not much to do with X. > > > Installation of Joe. > > > > Joe is always the first port I install as I am used to its commands. I then download and compile other ports. As I am currently on a low-bandwidth Internet connection, I try to keep the machine busy during the night with large downloads. > > Irrelevant It is as I only get errors like this when I install Joe first. > > > > > Parallel downloading and compilation of scribus and xorg-server > > > > > > How can we help newcomers to avoid this kind of problems? > > > > By contributing to PRs and the correct mailing list with solutions, > outcomes, patches etc... > I am one step further now. As I am getting errors like this very often since I use this method of installing ports I thought that there must be something basic what I am doing wrong. The cause of the problem happens much earlier. I used PCBSD to get FreeBSD onto the disk and did then a source upgrade. This went fine. But PCBSD installed many ports. I assumed now that after deleting them with 'pkg_delete -a' there are all gone and installation can start. Of course, pkg_delete brings some error messages that it could not delete this or that as the package list is wrong. After getting the errors mentioned here, I used to run 'make deinstall' in the affected port. This solved the problem. I wonder now what the difference between pkg_delete and make deinstall is. As I mentioned before, I am getting these errors randomly since around 2007. I obviously never used make deinstall then. I will go back now to the FreeBSD ports installation. > Part of it made it to this thread under a wrong subject line but its a > start... > > Erich From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 00:21:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E671F106566B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:21:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A108FC08 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:21:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhj8 with SMTP id hj8so4776046wib.13 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:21:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=B4M79sBJkHnheZzgKI6roJQYotbyfnRTe7VQfSEhB7Q=; b=fE/MBpeD7Ux18LUufoIWo5qNQnLDZl+C5G0pjpaMM08XaFVVQK7qZvkSzXofMBA8VF ODTL6Pupbpn8PDiEPvavi+3sfc7e7qU0NsrmuNJwPuK4wEQEnN5xKzo9wKMVTs8vBTcc YZIRr4z7FYEBBZdd6I/+aIlYA0I9CIQKMvd1tDgdehFzScdulnqJ08NDXZ8bk34Kd7Ia YmEE2wvjZNpWFZiD4I0YS6ucVFL6SpjrYyNyLqJSxps+6i1567IXcIMd4MuQNh1Wncto 7q/TPl4A2slSudvKuYb3eJutoadIueH2v1heM+tByHZocCxuIPd9Im7tBGyz1jIRHS+k BWXA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.134.145 with SMTP id s17mr11641594wei.22.1339633290704; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.155.4 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:21:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1443905.ZHsCDgXC9N@x220.ovitrap.com> References: <29122915.NDnaqcIOs3@x220.ovitrap.com> <20120613042016.GA3206@DataIX.net> <1443905.ZHsCDgXC9N@x220.ovitrap.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:21:30 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: Erich Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why are you NOT using FreeBSD --> an example and a solution X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:21:33 -0000 On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Erich wrote= : > Hi, > > On 13 June 2012 0:20:16 Jason Hellenthal wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:53:04AM +0700, Erich wrote: >> > Hi, >> >> Hi, Do we really need another one of these pointless rambling threads... > > if it helps to keep newcomers with FreeBSD. >> >> > >> > I placed FreeBSD 10 on an empty disk and downloaded then the ports tre= e from yesterday. >> > >> > >> > http://wiki.freebsd.org/Intel_GPU >> >> Read the FAQ ? > > The problem has not much to do with X. >> >> > Installation of Joe. >> > >> > Joe is always the first port I install as I am used to its commands. I= then download and compile other ports. As I am currently on a low-bandwidt= h Internet connection, I try to keep the machine busy during the night with= large downloads. >> >> Irrelevant > > It is as I only get errors like this when I install Joe first. >> >> > >> > Parallel downloading and compilation of scribus and xorg-server >> > >> > >> > How can we help newcomers to avoid this kind of problems? >> > >> >> By contributing to PRs and the correct mailing list with solutions, >> outcomes, patches etc... >> > I am one step further now. As I am getting errors like this very often si= nce I use this method =A0of installing ports I thought that there must be s= omething basic what I am doing wrong. > > The cause of the problem happens much earlier. I used PCBSD to get FreeBS= D onto the disk and did then a source upgrade. This went fine. But PCBSD in= stalled many ports. I assumed now that after deleting them with 'pkg_delete= -a' there are all gone and installation can start. > > Of course, pkg_delete brings some error messages that it could not delete= this or that as the package list is wrong. > > After getting the errors mentioned here, I used to run 'make deinstall' i= n the affected port. This solved the problem. I wonder now what the differe= nce between pkg_delete and make deinstall is. > > As I mentioned before, I am getting these errors randomly since around 20= 07. I obviously never used make deinstall then. > > I will go back now to the FreeBSD ports installation. > >> Part of it made it to this thread under a wrong subject line but its a >> start... I strongly recommend that you install ports-mgmt/portmaster (if you have not done so) and read the man page (YES! You really need to read it all!) and note the example for re-installing all ports. It will assure that all ports are cleanly re-installed. I do admit that I don't delete /usr/local/*, but I do get rid of most everything in it like bin, lib, include (especially important), libexec, libdata, info, modules, man, and so on. (Almost abbreviated "and so on" to "etc which would have triggered much hilarity and some keyboard smashing!) I never install anything of my own in /usr/local, but use /usr/opt for that. If you do it as suggested, you should end up with a very clean, updated sys= tem. --=20 R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 01:14:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D021065674 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 01:14:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358488FC0C for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 01:14:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x220.ovitrap.com ([122.129.201.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q5E1EdGn018214; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:14:41 -0600 From: Erich To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:14:30 +0700 Message-ID: <1359272.gCyT45lP5v@x220.ovitrap.com> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.3 (Linux/3.3.7-1.fc16.x86_64; KDE/4.8.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <29122915.NDnaqcIOs3@x220.ovitrap.com> <1443905.ZHsCDgXC9N@x220.ovitrap.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: Why are you NOT using FreeBSD --> an example and a solution X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 01:14:42 -0000 Hi, On 13 June 2012 17:21:30 Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Erich wrote: > > On 13 June 2012 0:20:16 Jason Hellenthal wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:53:04AM +0700, Erich wrote: > I strongly recommend that you install ports-mgmt/portmaster (if you I use portupgrade for upgrades. It should lead to the same result. > have not done so) and read the man page (YES! You really need to read > it all!) and note the example for re-installing all ports. It will > assure that all ports are cleanly re-installed. > > I do admit that I don't delete /usr/local/*, but I do get rid of most > everything in it like bin, lib, include (especially important), > libexec, libdata, info, modules, man, and so on. (Almost abbreviated > "and so on" to "etc which would have triggered much hilarity and some > keyboard smashing!) I never install anything of my own in /usr/local, > but use /usr/opt for that. > I never did this. It is a good idea as it really cleans the system and you have your own stuff outside the third-party stuff. > If you do it as suggested, you should end up with a very clean, updated system. > I did not want to upgrade it. I just wanted a fast solution to have FreeBSD running and than start from scratch. This starting from real scratch did not work. It seems that your solution would also solved the problem. I never thought of this. Erich From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 02:26:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759F3106564A for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 02:26:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@larseighner.com) Received: from mail.team1internet.com (mail.team1internet.com [216.110.13.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DA58FC08 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 02:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from larseighner.com (unknown [71.20.75.102]) by mail.team1internet.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 61E4416B4AB for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:26:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: by larseighner.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1001 lars@larseighner.com; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:24:33 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:24:31 -0500 (CDT) From: Lars Eighner X-X-Sender: lars@noos.larseighnerhome.com To: freebsd-ports Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Xscreensaver conflicts X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 02:26:12 -0000 xscreensaver-gnome-hacks will not install if xscreensaver is installed ("write files to the same place") gnome requires xscreensaver-gnome-hacks kde4 requires xscreensaver It appears to me that if you force pkg_delete of xscreensaver and install xscreensaver-gnome-hacks first, you can reinstall xscreensaver without complaints. I grepped UPDATING for xscreensaver without any hits and do not find this documented. I suspect the conflicts line in the Makefile xscreensave-gnome-hacks is not accurate. -- Lars Eighner http://www.larseighner.com/index.html 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 06:05:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3806B1065676 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 06:05:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@dataix.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABB58FC12 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 06:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so1380287yhg.13 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:05:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dataix.net; s=rsa; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition; bh=O+OynmbeSoK7PZsE90Facy/tI0Ge/KkhB0HS4o3Ew4g=; b=Azc3ceI5vByo3g3HfFJYSBmx4hJzImimkBu25WKY6+FN2AZFu11jRWaU0Vut9/2az6 iPEzU+Iw6Y2oaxuhw70ZjqY3tX2KaT5WVixMZGSadde1gFHI7XpLMJ0ZySJJKv63+5Jy /IIxftm8vbvij64Iik70mhQaTW4TGxIEwsxrs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:x-gm-message-state; bh=O+OynmbeSoK7PZsE90Facy/tI0Ge/KkhB0HS4o3Ew4g=; b=MsIT4hHipUCR86iW7wqdZJ9wCo9MtmMpxVe3+Aw+GCo06hwRs9iL7ZdJWgG3tujZ/Y Mi8sJSSJr20YOW6VuHT4n+yOMtGQLYhM2hTYx6N9r21oX8VLdm/bCuaqXXu0UPHceez+ ekOGOQQzmPhLdBGMt+QU82bL/3esZO5Wx1Fs6zbq/NKmNttN5A1D+H1bMNXpN7yzoDkI THw5AWTPTykbz9LfMbElaC1UyPrMnqC/rEt0pa3iy3mdoR2Q421Adf8ExM8DXZuXDNZ0 XBLXzpyf9vPtNyINjBrSmvLVpLJaQ/GK3+HD4oJKTBrzFJGAmbk3kfiMPU4aOCi5Y/P/ /w2g== Received: by 10.236.77.164 with SMTP id d24mr622217yhe.129.1339653907283; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:05:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (75-128-120-86.dhcp.aldl.mi.charter.com. [75.128.120.86]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a34sm17382387yhh.0.2012.06.13.23.05.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:05:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DataIX.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5E654BY005944 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Jun 2012 02:05:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Received: (from jh@localhost) by DataIX.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5E6536A005943; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 02:05:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhellenthal@DataIX.net) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 02:05:03 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal To: David Woodhouse Message-ID: <20120614060503.GA5752@DataIX.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VrqPEDrXMn8OVzN4" Content-Disposition: inline X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmvmHziGJ6w9xPJ+7FEKmLzYy/6DuW6Aien/tPofqE6/pLd12E3plYtiP5HoKp25utrDqYg Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Patches for Review (security/vpnc) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 06:05:08 -0000 --VrqPEDrXMn8OVzN4 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="AqsLC8rIMeq19msA" Content-Disposition: inline --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David, Could you take a look over the following attached patches and comments and make a consideration on these. Thanks. --=20 - (2^(N-1)) --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="vpnc-script-patchset.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r2 | jh | 2012-06-14 01:14:16 -0400 (Thu, 14 Jun 2012) | 4 lines ASCII'fy the copyrights section. less(1) and other tools see it as binary. Index: vpnc-script =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D --- vpnc-script (revision 1) +++ vpnc-script (revision 2) @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ #!/bin/sh # # Originally part of vpnc source code: -# =A9 2005-2012 Maurice Massar, J=F6rg Mayer, Antonio Borneo et al. -# =A9 2009-2012 David Woodhouse +# (c) 2005-2012 Maurice Massar, J=F6rg Mayer, Antonio Borneo et al. +# (c) 2009-2012 David Woodhouse # # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r3 | jh | 2012-06-14 01:25:31 -0400 (Thu, 14 Jun 2012) | 13 lines Adjust checking for if_tun to use kldstat(8) in place of /dev/tun /dev/tun is legacy usage and should be discouraged from further use. When sysctl net.link.tun.devfs_cloning=3D0 there is no /dev/tun device to probe. kldstat(8) and the current flags (-qm) for FreeBSD reach back to 7.X and possibly further, so invoke them. While here kldload if_tun.ko quietly (-q) See if_tun(4), kldstat(8), kldload(8) Index: vpnc-script =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D --- vpnc-script (revision 2) +++ vpnc-script (revision 3) @@ -593,12 +593,12 @@ fi fi elif [ "$OS" =3D "FreeBSD" ]; then - if [ ! -e /dev/tun ]; then - kldload if_tun + if ! kldstat -qm if_tun; then + kldload -q if_tun fi elif [ "$OS" =3D "GNU/kFreeBSD" ]; then - if [ ! -e /dev/tun ]; then - kldload if_tun + if ! kldstat -qm if_tun; then + kldload -q if_tun fi elif [ "$OS" =3D "NetBSD" ]; then : ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r4 | jh | 2012-06-14 01:42:30 -0400 (Thu, 14 Jun 2012) | 11 lines Interface creation and deletion should be handled directly by vpnc and return status should be handed back over to the script for negotiation. For now comment out the implicit tunnel deletion function until it can be reworked. Things to consider are possible legacy use cases net.link.tun.devfs_cloning but should not be depended on. Index: vpnc-script =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D --- vpnc-script (revision 3) +++ vpnc-script (revision 4) @@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ if [ -n "$INTERNAL_IP4_DNS" ]; then $RESTORERESOLVCONF fi - destroy_tun_device + #destroy_tun_device } =20 #### Main ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA-- --VrqPEDrXMn8OVzN4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP2X8OAAoJEBSh2Dr1DU7Wwt0H/Rh7Td7mnKTDmIccbl1cgsaQ qt3Rd+52l3oBpxztSqvA4n2SlzKVx7pZm1hPGkyhozJzuISnbAuyWJtLxD+Tg4fs C9NvH4ocCnSoKUEhXwC/CaBpumHqOu8nL9V5EpZYCF9OoYtwQMJO5xV2K/eV6IwG BqhOU6cBLT0vX4lAbOafQz29GyO0OVltcV9yF+25RxE8SmVuDLc5J25Jp1BBuqi5 7lAheZXi0hQGaXgx9/fu67Bfa6rx0aO2atxTc0F7THZUxvPStCf+9FImSj+g7BVU +ORCqRvNabGSz+AljLxWPztuttAUa0o22kZDxDcfpUQp67/K0xFmw0hF0HOwmEE= =o6Hz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VrqPEDrXMn8OVzN4-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 06:44:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224EC106564A for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 06:44:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from radek.krejca@starnet.cz) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz (exchange.mail.starnet.cz [92.62.224.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810868FC0C for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 06:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::7534:a1f0:da0:e34d]) by EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::7534:a1f0:da0:e34d%15]) with mapi; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:40:19 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Radek_Krej=E8a?= To: "'ports@freebsd.org'" Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:40:19 +0200 Thread-Topic: Proftpd mysql problem after upgrade ports Thread-Index: Ac1J+RaijbSGgG3MT7StmNEK76K/KA== Message-ID: Accept-Language: cs-CZ Content-Language: cs-CZ X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: cs-CZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Subject: Proftpd mysql problem after upgrade ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 06:44:08 -0000 Hi, I have problem with this module. I upgraded ports and I have this proft= pd.conf ServerName "Servername" ServerType standalone ServerIdent on "Servers identifying string" DeferWelcome on DefaultServer on UseIPv6 on DefaultRoot ~ AllowOverwrite on DisplayLogin .welcome # Textfile to display on login DisplayConnect .connect # Textfile to display on connection UseReverseDNS off IdentLookups off Port 21 Umask 022 MaxInstances 15 MaxClientsPerHost 3 "Only %m connections per host allowed" MaxClients 10 "Only %m total simultanious logins all= owed" MaxHostsPerUser 1 User nobody Group nobody ScoreboardFile /var/log/scoreboard # Some logging formats LogFormat default "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %s %b" LogFormat auth "%v [%P] %h %t \"%r\" %s" LogFormat write "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %s %b" # Define log-files to use #TransferLog /var/log/proftpd.xferlog #ExtendedLog /var/log/proftpd.access_log WRITE,READ write #ExtendedLog /var/log/proftpd.auth_log AUTH auth #ExtendedLog /var/log/proftpd.paranoid_log ALL default #SQLLogFile /var/log/proftpd.mysql #QuotaLog /var/log/proftpd.quota # Set up authentication via SQL # =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D SQLEngine on SQLAuthenticate on AuthOrder mod_sql.c SQLAuthTypes Backend SQLConnectInfo proftpd_admin@localhost proftpd_admin pokus=20 SQLUserInfo usertable userid passwd uid gid homedir shell=20 SQLGroupInfo grouptable groupname gid members=20 SQLUserWhereClause "disabled=3D0 and (NOW()<=3Dexpiration or expiratio= n=3D-1 or expiration=3D0)" # Log the user logging in SQLLog PASS counter SQLNamedQuery counter UPDATE "lastlogin=3Dnow(), count=3Dcount+1 WHERE user= id=3D'%u'" usertable # logout log SQLLog EXIT time_logout SQLNamedQuery time_logout UPDATE "lastlogout=3Dnow() WHERE userid=3D'%u'" u= sertable # display last login time when PASS command is given SQLNamedQuery login_time SELECT "lastlogin from usertable where userid=3D'%= u'" SQLShowInfo PASS "230" "Last login was: %{login_time}" # xfer Log in mysql SQLLog RETR,STOR transfer1 SQLNamedQuery transfer1 INSERT "'%u', '%f', '%b', '%h', '%a', '%m', '%T', = now(), 'c', NULL" xfer_stat SQLLOG ERR_RETR,ERR_STOR transfer2 SQLNamedQuery transfer2 INSERT "'%u', '%f', '%b', '%h', '%a', '%m', '%T', = now(), 'i', NULL" xfer_stat # User quotas # =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D #QuotaEngine on #QuotaDirectoryTally on #QuotaDisplayUnits Mb #QuotaShowQuotas on #SQLNamedQuery get-quota-limit SELECT "name, quota_type, per_session, limit= _type, bytes_in_avail, bytes_out_avail, bytes_xfer_avail, files_in_avail, f= iles_out_avail, files_xfer_avail FROM ftpquotalimits WHERE name =3D '%{0}' = AND quota_type =3D '%{1}'" #SQLNamedQuery get-quota-tally SELECT "name, quota_type, bytes_in_used, byt= es_out_used, bytes_xfer_used, files_in_used, files_out_used, files_xfer_use= d FROM ftpquotatallies WHERE name =3D '%{0}' AND quota_type =3D '%{1}'" #SQLNamedQuery update-quota-tally UPDATE "bytes_in_used =3D bytes_in_used += %{0}, bytes_out_used =3D bytes_out_used + %{1}, bytes_xfer_used =3D bytes_= xfer_used + %{2}, files_in_used =3D files_in_used + %{3}, files_out_used = =3D files_out_used + %{4}, files_xfer_used =3D files_xfer_used + %{5} WHERE= name =3D '%{6}' AND quota_type =3D '%{7}'" ftpquotatallies #SQLNamedQuery insert-quota-tally INSERT "%{0}, %{1}, %{2}, %{3}, %{4}, %{5= }, %{6}, %{7}" ftpquotatallies #QuotaLimitTable sql:/get-quota-limit #QuotaTallyTable sql:/get-quota-tally/update-quota-tally/insert-quota-tally AllowStoreRestart on AllowRetrieveRestart on RequireValidShell off #PathDenyFilter "\\.ftp)|\\.ht)[a-z]+$"=20 DenyFilter \*.*/ AllowOverwrite off HideNoAccess off AllowAll DenyGroup !admins AllowOverwrite on HideNoAccess on DenyGroup !admins AllowAll Before upgrade ports I had=20 proftpd-1.3.4a Highly configurable FTP daemon proftpd-mod_sql_mysql-1.3.4a MySQL module for ProFTPD and this config file worked. After upgrade I have=20 proftpd-1.3.4a_2 Highly configurable FTP daemon proftpd-mod_sql_mysql-1.3.4a_2 MySQL module for ProFTPD and after starting I got this message: Fatal: unknown configuration directi= ve 'SQLEngine' on line 43 of '/usr/local/etc/proftpd.conf' It looks like, that mod_sql isnt loaded,=20 Compiled-in modules: mod_core.c mod_xfer.c mod_auth_unix.c mod_auth_file.c mod_auth.c mod_ls.c mod_log.c mod_site.c mod_delay.c mod_facts.c mod_dso.c mod_ident.c mod_auth_pam.c mod_ctrls.c mod_lang.c but I have compiled port proftpd with mod_sql (/var/db/ports/proftpd/option= s OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=3DSQL OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=3DSQL_PASSWD) Where could be a problem? I have fbsd 9.0 latest amd64 generic kernel. Thank you for any suggestion. Radek From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 07:15:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217C2106566B; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:15:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrnils@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 729F08FC08; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:15:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so1438507bkv.13 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:15:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=i+qz09N7ECxDUQqE81tEDmYsgaR+HCK5bxixYIAGSzo=; b=T9OvMdQOtLzYbRNfkqInJt2ES3ybJdJygmAM/u3BWTKXDeJVhmtYrz6eA8SWobSc02 Zb/WxB+fuoR1ogH2N3jiZJZ/XJkK6I/H+ojLn5Jb1Qp5CuCQV6U809QNvX/iOzKYnTCX B2tm2Ej5A2RAMzBgY9ioT1FDEmzoQVL8xfR6irfc9TS9x4uI+tYlG+9cGIqNl10QlJGo /JGWV0Ok16/KkGJlsFiRe7fI5aZQK5/XJXDcUZO/ej/4dPk3Y6JqBoHCChAQfqBzuDB2 S1Rpim8eID0wUysncdNuepX/v6C7cB/iIrxxSNKGzG1dA1gnVDQ6ITMJQSivzX0FR3yi Sktg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.156.217 with SMTP id y25mr315992bkw.65.1339658123508; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:15:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.100.83 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:15:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120607203753.2466c63a.miwi@FreeBSD.org> <4fd44f39.06db440a.4ccb.ffffe4e1SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <4fd465a3.46e8440a.7470.0336SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:15:23 +0200 Message-ID: From: Andreas Nilsson To: Ivan Klymenko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Alexander Yerenkow , x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Xorg 7.7 ready for testing! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:15:25 -0000 On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Andreas Nilsson wrote= : > > > On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > >> =D0=92 Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:48:41 +0300 >> Alexander Yerenkow =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >> >> > Is this fresh installation or you were upgrading? >> > I'm preparing now live image with new xorg, and don't saw such errors. >> > But I had yesterday's src/ports tree. >> > >> > >> >> Forgot to add - to svn r501 everything is fine build and working... > > > I checked out the xorg repo yesterday and it built just fine ( on > 9.0-RELEASE with drm-all.14.5-releng9.0.patch ). I actually did this in = a > clone of my root-dataset so I started with pkg_delete -a :) ) > > Just a thought: shouldn't the new intel driver be part of the OPTIONS of > the new xorg-drivers? > > I'll write back with the results when I get back into the office. > > Regards > So after upgrade to 9-stable xorg-7.7 starts just fine. Lets hope it keeps running. I would prefer to have xorg-7.7 becoming the default version of X, at least on 9 and above. And how does the nvidia binary blob work with xorg-7.7? Regards Andreas From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 07:20:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECF4106564A for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:20:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from BATV+c13489e6fd694e8db9b0+3217+infradead.org+dwmw2@casper.srs.infradead.org) Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [85.118.1.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2C88FC12 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:20:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shinybook.infradead.org ([2001:8b0:10b:1:e6ce:8fff:fe1f:f2c0]) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Sf4M5-0008RO-NA; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:20:34 +0000 Message-ID: <1339658432.2141.58.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> From: David Woodhouse To: Jason Hellenthal Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:20:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20120614060503.GA5752@DataIX.net> References: <20120614060503.GA5752@DataIX.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="sha1"; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="=-lMVj5Lvh/KFWCfc/JfZa" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.2 (3.4.2-2.fc17) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by casper.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Patches for Review (security/vpnc) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:20:41 -0000 --=-lMVj5Lvh/KFWCfc/JfZa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable These mostly look good; thanks. Please could I have each with a 'Signed-off-by:' tag? See the 'Submitting Patches' section of http://www.infradead.org/openconnect/contribute.html for more background on that (and exactly what you're agreeing to). On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 02:05 -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > r2 | jh | 2012-06-14 01:14:16 -0400 (Thu, 14 Jun 2012) | 4 lines > ASCII'fy the copyrights section. less(1) and other tools see it as > binary. I'd rather not do this; I'd rather you file bugs against the tools which see it as binary. We're over a decade into the 21st century now; =E2=88=84 excuse for still u= sing EBCDIC, 7-bit ASCII or other legacy nonsense. Anyone who isn't operating a policy of "everything on my system is UTF-8 as far as possible, converted from legacy crap on the way in and begrudgingly converted to legacy crap on the way out *only* if we really must" is asking for trouble and mislabelled text. As long as this is only a cosmetic issue =E2=80=94 and I think it is =E2=80= =94 I'd really prefer it to stay as it is. If it annoys someone with broken tools or who is living in the 20th century, then that's just fine by me =E2=98=BA Btw, I *would* accept patches to openconnect itself, to convert UTF-8 banners and prompts that we receive from the server into legacy crap for local display. You could still call that a "cosmetic" issue, I suppose, but it's an issue that actually affects the *user*, if they have a legacy local encoding and the server is giving non-ASCII in its prompts. > r3 | jh | 2012-06-14 01:25:31 -0400 (Thu, 14 Jun 2012) | 13 lines > Adjust checking for if_tun to use kldstat(8) in place of /dev/tun > While here kldload if_tun.ko quietly (-q) Sounds good, and ISTR seeing a discussion in which it was confirmed that this worked when if_tun was built in to the kernel statically too? I'm going to defer entirely to you on the "back to 7.x and possibly further" bit, and assume that it's reasonable not to care if there are people with older systems on which this doesn't work? Changes here tend to get merged into upstream vpnc too, so if there's an ancient FreeBSD user who *does* happen to rebuild upstream vpnc for security fixes, perhaps it'll break for them? I'm fine with not caring about that if you (collectively, assuming my mail makes it to the ports@ list) are. > r4 | jh | 2012-06-14 01:42:30 -0400 (Thu, 14 Jun 2012) | 11 lines >=20 > Interface creation and deletion should be handled directly by vpnc and > return status should be handed back over to the script for > negotiation. Would be very nice if someone who knows the intimate details of FreeBSD tunnel devices could respond to my outstanding queries about this. If we can make the device go away automatically when its fd is closed, like we can on all other systems, that would be best. > For now comment out the implicit tunnel deletion function until it can > be reworked. I think we still need destroy_tun_device to run on NetBSD. Can you comment out just the FreeBSD part of the case statement in destroy_tun_device() instead? --=20 dwmw2 --=-lMVj5Lvh/KFWCfc/JfZa Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIUbjCCBjQw ggQcoAMCAQICAR4wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwfTELMAkGA1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0 Q29tIEx0ZC4xKzApBgNVBAsTIlNlY3VyZSBEaWdpdGFsIENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNpZ25pbmcxKTAn BgNVBAMTIFN0YXJ0Q29tIENlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gQXV0aG9yaXR5MB4XDTA3MTAyNDIxMDE1NVoX DTE3MTAyNDIxMDE1NVowgYwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAklMMRYwFAYDVQQKEw1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQuMSsw KQYDVQQLEyJTZWN1cmUgRGlnaXRhbCBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTaWduaW5nMTgwNgYDVQQDEy9TdGFy dENvbSBDbGFzcyAxIFByaW1hcnkgSW50ZXJtZWRpYXRlIENsaWVudCBDQTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcN AQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAMcJg8zOLdgasSmkLhOrlr6KMoOMpohBllVHrdRvEg/q6r8jR+EK 75xCGhR8ToREoqe7zM9/UnC6TS2y9UKTpT1v7RSMzR0t6ndl0TWBuUr/UXBhPk+Kmy7bI4yW4urC +y7P3/1/X7U8ocb8VpH/Clt+4iq7nirMcNh6qJR+xjOhV+VHzQMALuGYn5KZmc1NbJQYclsGkDxD z2UbFqE2+6vIZoL+jb9x4Pa5gNf1TwSDkOkikZB1xtB4ZqtXThaABSONdfmv/Z1pua3FYxnCFmdr /+N2JLKutIxMYqQOJebr/f/h5t95m4JgrM3Y/w7YX9d7YAL9jvN4SydHsU6n65cCAwEAAaOCAa0w ggGpMA8GA1UdEwEB/wQFMAMBAf8wDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgEGMB0GA1UdDgQWBBRTcu2SnODaywFc fH6WNU7y1LhRgjAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBROC+8apEBbpRdphzDKNGhD0EGu8jBmBggrBgEFBQcBAQRa MFgwJwYIKwYBBQUHMAGGG2h0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9jYTAtBggrBgEFBQcwAoYh aHR0cDovL3d3dy5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vc2ZzY2EuY3J0MFsGA1UdHwRUMFIwJ6AloCOGIWh0dHA6 Ly93d3cuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL3Nmc2NhLmNybDAnoCWgI4YhaHR0cDovL2NybC5zdGFydHNzbC5j b20vc2ZzY2EuY3JsMIGABgNVHSAEeTB3MHUGCysGAQQBgbU3AQIBMGYwLgYIKwYBBQUHAgEWImh0 dHA6Ly93d3cuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL3BvbGljeS5wZGYwNAYIKwYBBQUHAgEWKGh0dHA6Ly93d3cu c3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL2ludGVybWVkaWF0ZS5wZGYwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggIBAAqDCH14qywG XLhjjF6uHLkjd02hcdh9hrw+VUsv+q1eeQWB21jWj3kJ96AUlPCoEGZ/ynJNScWy6QMVQjbbMXlt UfO4n4bGGdKo3awPWp61tjAFgraLJgDk+DsSvUD6EowjMTNx25GQgyYJ5RPIzKKR9tQW8gGK+2+R HxkUCTbYFnL6kl8Ch507rUdPPipJ9CgJFws3kDS3gOS5WFMxcjO5DwKfKSETEPrHh7p5shuuNktv sv6hxHTLhiMKX893gxdT3XLS9OKmCv87vkINQcNEcIIoFWbP9HORz9v3vQwR4e3ksLc2JZOAFK+s sS5XMEoznzpihEP0PLc4dCBYjbvSD7kxgDwZ+Aj8Q9PkbvE9sIPP7ON0fz095HdThKjiVJe6vofq +n6b1NBc8XdrQvBmunwxD5nvtTW4vtN6VY7mUCmxsCieuoBJ9OlqmsVWQvifIYf40dJPZkk9YgGT zWLpXDSfLSplbY2LL9C9U0ptvjcDjefLTvqSFc7tw1sEhF0n/qpA2r0GpvkLRDmcSwVyPvmjFBGq Up/pNy8ZuPGQmHwFi2/14+xeSUDG2bwnsYJQG2EdJCB6luQ57GEnTA/yKZSTKI8dDQa8Sd3zfXb1 9mOgSF0bBdXbuKhEpuP9wirslFe6fQ1t5j5R0xi72MZ8ikMu1RQZKCyDbMwazlHiMIIHFzCCBf+g AwIBAgIDBCZ6MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIGMMQswCQYDVQQGEwJJTDEWMBQGA1UEChMNU3RhcnRD b20gTHRkLjErMCkGA1UECxMiU2VjdXJlIERpZ2l0YWwgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2lnbmluZzE4MDYG A1UEAxMvU3RhcnRDb20gQ2xhc3MgMSBQcmltYXJ5IEludGVybWVkaWF0ZSBDbGllbnQgQ0EwHhcN MTIwNTAxMTI1ODI3WhcNMTMwNTAzMTEzNzIwWjBdMRkwFwYDVQQNExA4Y1VOSzUzMTc0ODRYRjk3 MRwwGgYDVQQDDBNkd213MkBpbmZyYWRlYWQub3JnMSIwIAYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhNkd213MkBpbmZy YWRlYWQub3JnMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAyYe7wo6MrtrB4uIGGbrY 4IifY/Xsq22pSv605yganL0+uyUdd8rCjrYlH6Q/ra5TVJCQFTgzaepkuqPQc79DC/Cxmzm6Qo+s wLZy868oFsccsVokL2bPAWIPaRXfNPJKkYR1FTWQfZpWJVQmT+sPf1XFUullVBAK+d9RztopyacI xWoZ/W/Cmv7mseQbttYTtGKJa0btX73nsQRWl6SgErWXo59zg9friCLTy1GXMXJYB8H+PtnuwX0w MrAvWDdX1ABgIlA17W3FraCn0eW15ZM46eyu0/amGzJZNtemCWF73P7BAijzeV1jNmiJFXdZ0DT0 w+hmtMO9PxdDUyt78QIDAQABo4IDrjCCA6owCQYDVR0TBAIwADALBgNVHQ8EBAMCBLAwHQYDVR0l BBYwFAYIKwYBBQUHAwIGCCsGAQUFBwMEMB0GA1UdDgQWBBTkfe5UOr3PcirsjApibyyUEfsyRzAf BgNVHSMEGDAWgBRTcu2SnODaywFcfH6WNU7y1LhRgjAeBgNVHREEFzAVgRNkd213MkBpbmZyYWRl YWQub3JnMIICIQYDVR0gBIICGDCCAhQwggIQBgsrBgEEAYG1NwECAjCCAf8wLgYIKwYBBQUHAgEW Imh0dHA6Ly93d3cuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL3BvbGljeS5wZGYwNAYIKwYBBQUHAgEWKGh0dHA6Ly93 d3cuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL2ludGVybWVkaWF0ZS5wZGYwgfcGCCsGAQUFBwICMIHqMCcWIFN0YXJ0 Q29tIENlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gQXV0aG9yaXR5MAMCAQEagb5UaGlzIGNlcnRpZmljYXRlIHdhcyBp c3N1ZWQgYWNjb3JkaW5nIHRvIHRoZSBDbGFzcyAxIFZhbGlkYXRpb24gcmVxdWlyZW1lbnRzIG9m IHRoZSBTdGFydENvbSBDQSBwb2xpY3ksIHJlbGlhbmNlIG9ubHkgZm9yIHRoZSBpbnRlbmRlZCBw dXJwb3NlIGluIGNvbXBsaWFuY2Ugb2YgdGhlIHJlbHlpbmcgcGFydHkgb2JsaWdhdGlvbnMuMIGc BggrBgEFBQcCAjCBjzAnFiBTdGFydENvbSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1dGhvcml0eTADAgECGmRM aWFiaWxpdHkgYW5kIHdhcnJhbnRpZXMgYXJlIGxpbWl0ZWQhIFNlZSBzZWN0aW9uICJMZWdhbCBh bmQgTGltaXRhdGlvbnMiIG9mIHRoZSBTdGFydENvbSBDQSBwb2xpY3kuMDYGA1UdHwQvMC0wK6Ap oCeGJWh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL2NydHUxLWNybC5jcmwwgY4GCCsGAQUFBwEBBIGB MH8wOQYIKwYBBQUHMAGGLWh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9zdWIvY2xhc3MxL2NsaWVu dC9jYTBCBggrBgEFBQcwAoY2aHR0cDovL2FpYS5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vY2VydHMvc3ViLmNsYXNz MS5jbGllbnQuY2EuY3J0MCMGA1UdEgQcMBqGGGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tLzANBgkq hkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAqDU1FKifNtCFJbLnvOi1BLRfk7mut55PMtPSZLJ4/AnG7AjmJnbBI4U5 DELwvVq3mIpwUpGqZUkqkZMEfBPIbfq517UZB3h4iANtqif+ULfTLhg5XgcK5eF8/T6EtX2c3epq ylARdleCbj/0FwiUDvPlTsA6PIN4SCekjRLgjKERrL3heFz+Hteq1rtMAvMkNuyL0/0ijyyg2y45 NASAl2Afl9SLes/fnoh9nBwzfNQfb6qDYUFpnglfpGrq/0b1NtaOUb2z1SR+H1tKlb8bVJJIdvpu mEi27kSRIhzk3h30uTfKkKetgy++ouyldxZ7KZ0PuoLQrBy465EoQLosETCCBxcwggX/oAMCAQIC AwQmejANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADCBjDELMAkGA1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0 ZC4xKzApBgNVBAsTIlNlY3VyZSBEaWdpdGFsIENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNpZ25pbmcxODA2BgNVBAMT L1N0YXJ0Q29tIENsYXNzIDEgUHJpbWFyeSBJbnRlcm1lZGlhdGUgQ2xpZW50IENBMB4XDTEyMDUw MTEyNTgyN1oXDTEzMDUwMzExMzcyMFowXTEZMBcGA1UEDRMQOGNVTks1MzE3NDg0WEY5NzEcMBoG A1UEAwwTZHdtdzJAaW5mcmFkZWFkLm9yZzEiMCAGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYTZHdtdzJAaW5mcmFkZWFk Lm9yZzCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAMmHu8KOjK7aweLiBhm62OCIn2P1 7KttqUr+tOcoGpy9PrslHXfKwo62JR+kP62uU1SQkBU4M2nqZLqj0HO/QwvwsZs5ukKPrMC2cvOv KBbHHLFaJC9mzwFiD2kV3zTySpGEdRU1kH2aViVUJk/rD39VxVLpZVQQCvnfUc7aKcmnCMVqGf1v wpr+5rHkG7bWE7RiiWtG7V+957EEVpekoBK1l6Ofc4PX64gi08tRlzFyWAfB/j7Z7sF9MDKwL1g3 V9QAYCJQNe1txa2gp9HlteWTOOnsrtP2phsyWTbXpglhe9z+wQIo83ldYzZoiRV3WdA09MPoZrTD vT8XQ1Mre/ECAwEAAaOCA64wggOqMAkGA1UdEwQCMAAwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgSwMB0GA1UdJQQWMBQG CCsGAQUFBwMCBggrBgEFBQcDBDAdBgNVHQ4EFgQU5H3uVDq9z3Iq7IwKYm8slBH7MkcwHwYDVR0j BBgwFoAUU3Ltkpzg2ssBXHx+ljVO8tS4UYIwHgYDVR0RBBcwFYETZHdtdzJAaW5mcmFkZWFkLm9y ZzCCAiEGA1UdIASCAhgwggIUMIICEAYLKwYBBAGBtTcBAgIwggH/MC4GCCsGAQUFBwIBFiJodHRw Oi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9wb2xpY3kucGRmMDQGCCsGAQUFBwIBFihodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0 YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9pbnRlcm1lZGlhdGUucGRmMIH3BggrBgEFBQcCAjCB6jAnFiBTdGFydENvbSBD ZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1dGhvcml0eTADAgEBGoG+VGhpcyBjZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSB3YXMgaXNzdWVk IGFjY29yZGluZyB0byB0aGUgQ2xhc3MgMSBWYWxpZGF0aW9uIHJlcXVpcmVtZW50cyBvZiB0aGUg U3RhcnRDb20gQ0EgcG9saWN5LCByZWxpYW5jZSBvbmx5IGZvciB0aGUgaW50ZW5kZWQgcHVycG9z ZSBpbiBjb21wbGlhbmNlIG9mIHRoZSByZWx5aW5nIHBhcnR5IG9ibGlnYXRpb25zLjCBnAYIKwYB BQUHAgIwgY8wJxYgU3RhcnRDb20gQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkwAwIBAhpkTGlhYmls aXR5IGFuZCB3YXJyYW50aWVzIGFyZSBsaW1pdGVkISBTZWUgc2VjdGlvbiAiTGVnYWwgYW5kIExp bWl0YXRpb25zIiBvZiB0aGUgU3RhcnRDb20gQ0EgcG9saWN5LjA2BgNVHR8ELzAtMCugKaAnhiVo dHRwOi8vY3JsLnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9jcnR1MS1jcmwuY3JsMIGOBggrBgEFBQcBAQSBgTB/MDkG CCsGAQUFBzABhi1odHRwOi8vb2NzcC5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vc3ViL2NsYXNzMS9jbGllbnQvY2Ew QgYIKwYBBQUHMAKGNmh0dHA6Ly9haWEuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL2NlcnRzL3N1Yi5jbGFzczEuY2xp ZW50LmNhLmNydDAjBgNVHRIEHDAahhhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS8wDQYJKoZIhvcN AQEFBQADggEBAKg1NRSonzbQhSWy57zotQS0X5O5rreeTzLT0mSyePwJxuwI5iZ2wSOFOQxC8L1a t5iKcFKRqmVJKpGTBHwTyG36ude1GQd4eIgDbaon/lC30y4YOV4HCuXhfP0+hLV9nN3qaspQEXZX gm4/9BcIlA7z5U7AOjyDeEgnpI0S4IyhEay94Xhc/h7Xqta7TALzJDbsi9P9Io8soNsuOTQEgJdg H5fUi3rP356IfZwcM3zUH2+qg2FBaZ4JX6Rq6v9G9TbWjlG9s9Ukfh9bSpW/G1SSSHb6bphItu5E kSIc5N4d9Lk3ypCnrYMvvqLspXcWeymdD7qC0KwcuOuRKEC6LBExggNvMIIDawIBATCBlDCBjDEL MAkGA1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKzApBgNVBAsTIlNlY3VyZSBEaWdp dGFsIENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNpZ25pbmcxODA2BgNVBAMTL1N0YXJ0Q29tIENsYXNzIDEgUHJpbWFy eSBJbnRlcm1lZGlhdGUgQ2xpZW50IENBAgMEJnowCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAa8wGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkD MQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMTIwNjE0MDcyMDMyWjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQx FgQULUhiZ0xjMkQ5uSZ89tBgeBbm1M8wgaUGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDGBlzCBlDCBjDELMAkGA1UEBhMC SUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKzApBgNVBAsTIlNlY3VyZSBEaWdpdGFsIENlcnRp ZmljYXRlIFNpZ25pbmcxODA2BgNVBAMTL1N0YXJ0Q29tIENsYXNzIDEgUHJpbWFyeSBJbnRlcm1l ZGlhdGUgQ2xpZW50IENBAgMEJnowgacGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMYGXoIGUMIGMMQswCQYDVQQGEwJJ TDEWMBQGA1UEChMNU3RhcnRDb20gTHRkLjErMCkGA1UECxMiU2VjdXJlIERpZ2l0YWwgQ2VydGlm aWNhdGUgU2lnbmluZzE4MDYGA1UEAxMvU3RhcnRDb20gQ2xhc3MgMSBQcmltYXJ5IEludGVybWVk aWF0ZSBDbGllbnQgQ0ECAwQmejANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCAQA3SHNcy9yhFeRC+Jgz/7Qg5+r8 punkYkdNJGaYS3qJqTKpm9emem7CDiW01lSKLkKiB/rohIbRq29z7bdmFrtK0YtN4VqGAYKTzSTm PUOnJ0U1tY4ByKSSY7mmHXp62O7NWprYG30SOXPwTq0Czb7tJERgBYkpst+L3oh+9hprt2P/gJne u35nrA7u4cPG7iZisg2xrZ8EyMjJzhrKSYjYZb5WLSfDDhp6izu3R9vgO8dgHMArMRGbkt9BrIUi MROISZUeEAuGhczXFR3EaVacHO2HFwzW8jvd9GrwmJzwrrrv3EFa9pgTtnSTNdTwncY5QV8hv+5B bc5Stk+H48MUAAAAAAAA --=-lMVj5Lvh/KFWCfc/JfZa-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 08:00:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACDC106564A for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:00:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02EA58FC15 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9DD82842F; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:00:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (static-84-242-120-26.net.upcbroadband.cz [84.242.120.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D735328426; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:00:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FD99A22.7020308@quip.cz> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:00:34 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Radek_Krej=E8a?= References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "'ports@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: Proftpd mysql problem after upgrade ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:00:43 -0000 Radek Krejèa wrote: > Hi, I have problem with this module. I upgraded ports and I have this proftpd.conf You don't have a proper configuration. You need to put LoadModule directives in to proftpd.conf: # list of modules to load on startup LoadModule mod_sql.c LoadModule mod_sql_mysql.c It was mentioned in /usr/ports/UPDATING 20120126: AFFECTS: users of ftp/proftpd and ftp/proftpd-mysql AUTHOR: Martin Matuska The proftpd port has been updated to 1.3.4 and changed to use dynamically loadable modules. Please add corresponding LoadModule directives to your configuration file, like in the following example: LoadModule mod_tls.c The modules mod_sql_mysql and mod_sql_postgres are now outside of the main proftpd port: databases/proftpd-mod_sql_mysql databases/proftpd-mod_sql_postgres The proftpd-mysql port has been removed, use the alternative port: databases/proftpd-mod_sql_mysql > Before upgrade ports I had > proftpd-1.3.4a Highly configurable FTP daemon > proftpd-mod_sql_mysql-1.3.4a MySQL module for ProFTPD > > and this config file worked. After upgrade I have > proftpd-1.3.4a_2 Highly configurable FTP daemon > proftpd-mod_sql_mysql-1.3.4a_2 MySQL module for ProFTPD > > and after starting I got this message: Fatal: unknown configuration directive 'SQLEngine' on line 43 of '/usr/local/etc/proftpd.conf' > > It looks like, that mod_sql isnt loaded, > Compiled-in modules: > mod_core.c > mod_xfer.c > mod_auth_unix.c > mod_auth_file.c > mod_auth.c > mod_ls.c > mod_log.c > mod_site.c > mod_delay.c > mod_facts.c > mod_dso.c > mod_ident.c > mod_auth_pam.c > mod_ctrls.c > mod_lang.c > > but I have compiled port proftpd with mod_sql (/var/db/ports/proftpd/options OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=SQL > OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=SQL_PASSWD) > > Where could be a problem? > > I have fbsd 9.0 latest amd64 generic kernel. > > Thank you for any suggestion. Radek From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 08:14:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F92106564A; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:14:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463668FC12; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:14:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5E8Etip070422; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:14:55 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5E8EsKN070421; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:14:54 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:14:52 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20120614080633.GV60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TX8FgYyhBart40Z+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:14:55 -0000 --TX8FgYyhBart40Z+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 04:21:16PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: >=20 > Dear all, >=20 > After recent mention in this list that UNIQUENAME is not actually a > unique name for each port and how obviously non-sensical that is, plus > how it causes various problems with OPTIONS processing and how having a > proper UNIQUENAME will facilitate the new sub-package functionality > currently on the drawing board. >=20 > So, here are some patches: >=20 > http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/uniquenames.diff >=20 > There's also some data on the effect these have on OPTIONSFILE and > UNIQUENAME values per port in >=20 > http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/before/* > http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/after/* >=20 > Summarizing the changes: >=20 > * UNIQUENAME is now unique per port, and is primarily derived from > the port directory name. >=20 > * Where the port directory name isn't unique (eg. accessibility/orca > vs graphics/orca) there is a new UNIQUEPREFIX variable to > distinguish the affected ports. This is set for all the LANG > specific category ports (arabic, chinese, french, german, hebrew, > hungarian, japanese, korean, polish, portuguese, russian, > ukranian, vietnamese) to the standard 2 character abbreviation for > that LANG. Otherwise it is only set for the specific ports where > there is a directory name collision, usually based on the category > names. >=20 > * To avoid accidental non-uniqueness, UNIQUENAME should be treated > as a read-only variable by port maintainers. UNIQUEPREFIX should > only be set where necessary to resolve conflicts. All instances of > ports setting UNIQUENAME have been removed: in the majority of > cases, this turned out to be a no-op as the new UNIQUENAME turned > out to be the same as what most ports were previously overriding > it to. >=20 > * The way UNIQUENAME is defined means that it doesn't now change > depending on the version of python, ruby or apache installed on a > machine. >=20 > * UNIQUENAME will have changed for numerous ports -- consequently > port OPTIONFILEs may well have changed location. By default now, > each port should have an individual OPTIONFILE location. This > has removed a number of accidental cases of different (maybe > completely unrelated) ports sharing the same OPTIONSFILE. >=20 > * If you do want to share the same OPTIONSFILE between several > different ports, you can modify OPTIONSFILE directly or there is > now a new OPTIONS_DIR variable allowing a simple way for you to > override the location: OPTIONSFILE is redefined as: >=20 > OPTIONSFILE=3D ${PORT_DBDIR}/${OPTIONS_DIR}/options >=20 > with OPTIONS_DIR defaulting (as before) to UNIQUENAME unless > overriden. See databases/postgresql91-server for an example. >=20 > * Other things that may be affected: ports with USE_LDCONFIG or > USE_LDCONFIG32 can have ldconfig data written to a different > location. This shouldn't make any user-visible change. > Per-port options settings (OPTIONSng-style) in /etc/make.conf > may need to be modified. >=20 > Please test. Comments, corrections and bug reports will be most welcome. >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Matthew >=20 > --=20 > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey >=20 >=20 >=20 Thank you very much for the patch, it solves a problem that sticks for way = too long in the ports tree: the problem with options files. It also solve another problem which is really important when dealing with b= inary packages and will allow to simplify the life of pkgng development: we would= for real get a unique identifier for a package!!!, before for we were workaroun= ding the problem considering origin as our unique identifier which "worked" but = no that good, it was hard to track a package which was moved (no MOVED isn't an ideal solution to track them in full binary world) The other thing that it could solve for binary only world if that if people= from python ruby perl and others uses always the same uniquename for their defau= lt version, then it will be easy to move from python26 as a default to python2= 7 as a default in full binary environment with no manual intervention from the u= ser and no complex hacks to figure it out in the package tool. Last but no least once it is done the LATEST_LINK overwrite could die, and = the feature associated could just use LATEST_LINK. Please do test this patch comment on it and improve it. regards, Bapt --TX8FgYyhBart40Z+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/ZnXwACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzSDgCfSPnvbpsXYhrljNp0p63NBlq1 iUwAn3YTm+MDIxeMfc/Y6kb6woTCaXED =MdFK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TX8FgYyhBart40Z+-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 09:29:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3B2106566C; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:29:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from fsm2.ukr.net (fsm2.ukr.net [195.214.192.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2C78FC0A; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:29:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=fsm; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=y+plXhOP+CaUgaGnpFWOu+JGJLlnYOaEF+zzTFdbIHU=; b=teU/TnxRWbdrnNILE0H33k9zcCShcC8AvPfaDguCh1hJfHKDOKeYaCCLnH5vxsnwUtU7PS6p2yk7ubthfPJm7RW1DM0KYVUaY/zxof1yvsyyvolOVK9zBhbMjg4w/3l45+FpyWi0R+oqOBBOt845xnrnAAakYwwDplRU0MrXKTk=; Received: from [178.137.138.140] (helo=nonamehost) by fsm2.ukr.net with esmtpsa ID 1Sf6MS-000Dbq-Lg ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:29:04 +0300 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:29:03 +0300 From: Ivan Klymenko To: Baptiste Daroussin Message-ID: <20120614122903.77208228@nonamehost> In-Reply-To: <20120613221043.GS60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120613221745.23cdf52d@nonamehost> <20120613221043.GS60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="MP_/X7IY5Haov8+qH4=WaH9CxOb" Cc: dan@langille.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg is segmentation fault with of the cross-compile port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:29:06 -0000 --MP_/X7IY5Haov8+qH4=WaH9CxOb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline =D0=92 Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:10:43 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:17:45PM +0300, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > Hi all! > >=20 > > I building the packages of ports in the chroot system FreeBSD 9.0 > > i386 the parent system FreeBSD 9.0 amd64. > > pkg is segmentation fault in port devel/libtool. > >=20 > > full trace obtained a pkg.core file is here > > http://privatepaste.com/2c66b1204f > >=20 > > ports tree in a chroot - updated today > >=20 > > Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 > Wow strange I did a lot of tests in chroot for building ports (i386 > chroot on amd64 host) and it always work like a charm. >=20 > The failure you have also seems to come from a -a argument of pkg > register which is unused and will disappear from next version of > pkgng. >=20 > Can you send the the manifest (should in the > ${WORKDIR}/.metadir/+MANIFEST please? >=20 > regards, > Bapt name: libtool version: 2.4.2 origin: devel/libtool comment: | Generic shared library support script maintainer: autotools@FreeBSD.org prefix: /usr/local deps:. categories: [devel,] licenselogic: single licenses: [GPLv2,] users: [] groups: [] options: {} --MP_/X7IY5Haov8+qH4=WaH9CxOb Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=+MANIFEST Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=+MANIFEST bmFtZTogbGlidG9vbAp2ZXJzaW9uOiAyLjQuMgpvcmlnaW46IGRldmVsL2xpYnRvb2wKY29tbWVu dDogfAogIEdlbmVyaWMgc2hhcmVkIGxpYnJhcnkgc3VwcG9ydCBzY3JpcHQKbWFpbnRhaW5lcjog YXV0b3Rvb2xzQEZyZWVCU0Qub3JnCnByZWZpeDogL3Vzci9sb2NhbApkZXBzOiAKY2F0ZWdvcmll czogW2RldmVsLF0KbGljZW5zZWxvZ2ljOiBzaW5nbGUKbGljZW5zZXM6IFtHUEx2MixdCnVzZXJz OiBbXQpncm91cHM6IFtdCm9wdGlvbnM6IHt9Cg== --MP_/X7IY5Haov8+qH4=WaH9CxOb-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 10:36:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345CB106566C; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:36:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from geo.liaskos@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f49.google.com (mail-qa0-f49.google.com [209.85.216.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7008FC0A; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qabj40 with SMTP id j40so2110430qab.15 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 03:36:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+FIO+T+KxFaM/YB4SiZkL1hOsT681eXMGsatFyBXCwE=; b=G9UeuE79jMxaQuqIP1YdR+l/gsiT95+7O/sRO/kpQJi95203YbhoKN7O6OXO1KlnTv F96Oq9u/rIwQDZ31mh4TT+ufvDT86guil51Q4I9JMKYDiBsMF8SDoP3DB5cQufJRmdC4 lpPj86a2amdjerrYyL4t7FZIXdTjjvGuGjgx2lBQPRBGxURL1N5D16WjIALvTnlgh7zl OZotaHlsUSNKvRjSi2tVVfDFGp7w5t8m+PjEDAG9aX5ijibfkd5DZEbM3lkuiz8UofBG jniy/ZSo/IYEI3ieaqC7kln3eNCXZpoq9x2nLyGJz+ow360qSCCnxa/jXOcN55A+rSSA 2guA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.105.166 with SMTP id t38mr554110qco.136.1339670195043; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 03:36:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.213.8 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 03:36:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120613221043.GS60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120613221745.23cdf52d@nonamehost> <20120613221043.GS60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:36:35 +0300 Message-ID: From: George Liaskos To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Ivan Klymenko , dan@langille.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg is segmentation fault with of the cross-compile port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:36:36 -0000 On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:17:45PM +0300, Ivan Klymenko wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> I building the packages of ports in the chroot system FreeBSD 9.0 i386 >> the parent system FreeBSD 9.0 amd64. >> pkg is segmentation fault in port devel/libtool. >> >> full trace obtained a pkg.core file is here >> http://privatepaste.com/2c66b1204f >> >> ports tree in a chroot - updated today >> >> Thanks. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Wow strange I did a lot of tests in chroot for building ports (i386 chroot on > amd64 host) and it always work like a charm. > > The failure you have also seems to come from a -a argument of pkg register which > is unused and will disappear from next version of pkgng. > > Can you send the the manifest (should in the ${WORKDIR}/.metadir/+MANIFEST > please? > > regards, > Bapt I have reported the same a while ago, the backtrace seems identical. https://groups.google.com/group/mailing.freebsd.ports/browse_thread/thread/191ec99e36fb2536/bd8719c3370e98e7?show_docid=bd8719c3370e98e7 Regards, George From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 11:39:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68EFA1065670 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:39:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317A18FC08; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5EBdgIr067825; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:39:42 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5EBdfRV067824; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:39:41 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@freebsd.org using -f Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:39:37 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: George Liaskos Message-ID: <20120614113937.GZ60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120613221745.23cdf52d@nonamehost> <20120613221043.GS60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cnnC1+vf4lqgEF19" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Ivan Klymenko , dan@langille.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg is segmentation fault with of the cross-compile port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:39:42 -0000 --cnnC1+vf4lqgEF19 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 01:36:35PM +0300, George Liaskos wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wr= ote: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:17:45PM +0300, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > >> Hi all! > >> > >> I building the packages of ports in the chroot system FreeBSD 9.0 i386 > >> the parent system FreeBSD 9.0 amd64. > >> pkg is segmentation fault in port devel/libtool. > >> > >> full trace obtained a pkg.core file is here > >> http://privatepaste.com/2c66b1204f > >> > >> ports tree in a chroot - updated today > >> > >> Thanks. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" > > > > Wow strange I did a lot of tests in chroot for building ports (i386 chr= oot on > > amd64 host) and it always work like a charm. > > > > The failure you have also seems to come from a -a argument of pkg regis= ter which > > is unused and will disappear from next version of pkgng. > > > > Can you send the the manifest (should in the ${WORKDIR}/.metadir/+MANIF= EST > > please? > > > > regards, > > Bapt >=20 > I have reported the same a while ago, the backtrace seems identical. >=20 > https://groups.google.com/group/mailing.freebsd.ports/browse_thread/threa= d/191ec99e36fb2536/bd8719c3370e98e7?show_docid=3Dbd8719c3370e98e7 >=20 >=20 > Regards, > George > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Oh, I missed that one, in your case it is not running in a chroot, is it? strange is that I'm able to build 9.0-RELEASE i386 packages on pointyhat... regards, Bapt --cnnC1+vf4lqgEF19 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/ZzXkACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ez31gCcDW4NnqjeYL8ROx7rBpXZGjGV QJwAoJYSLy0ZjKNgB4QG9XY5GVPN+DXw =4pZC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cnnC1+vf4lqgEF19-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 12:37:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71081065674; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:37:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from fsm1.ukr.net (fsm1.ukr.net [195.214.192.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A2A8FC14; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:37:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=fsm; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=45dci3Dj+gnD/vvLK0i2605cRdEhFSxc1KoTxOh/GFs=; b=rS16YqmOT9V3NsEth5Sj5Dpe88eknjUbUj7G3vzr4KK1AZGa2+N3kzp1UPUg58YREGg4H1oEhDC3qaShjNYvbU5UZxtJrgYi/uh4R8UAWmyDHm3JEq7tPg6dwqzTA8PYFNSOmRehlLZLgaQPj2T+68nVl97pOx5p9GfizvFf9SM=; Received: from [178.137.138.140] (helo=nonamehost) by fsm1.ukr.net with esmtpsa ID 1Sf8zo-0005Zv-Rn ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:17:53 +0300 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:17:51 +0300 From: Ivan Klymenko To: Baptiste Daroussin Message-ID: <20120614151751.32240233@nonamehost> In-Reply-To: <20120614113937.GZ60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120613221745.23cdf52d@nonamehost> <20120613221043.GS60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120614113937.GZ60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: George Liaskos , dan@langille.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg is segmentation fault with of the cross-compile port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:37:47 -0000 =D0=92 Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:39:37 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 01:36:35PM +0300, George Liaskos wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Baptiste Daroussin > > wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:17:45PM +0300, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > >> Hi all! > > >> > > >> I building the packages of ports in the chroot system FreeBSD > > >> 9.0 i386 the parent system FreeBSD 9.0 amd64. > > >> pkg is segmentation fault in port devel/libtool. > > >> > > >> full trace obtained a pkg.core file is here > > >> http://privatepaste.com/2c66b1204f > > >> > > >> ports tree in a chroot - updated today > > >> > > >> Thanks. > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > >> "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > Wow strange I did a lot of tests in chroot for building ports > > > (i386 chroot on amd64 host) and it always work like a charm. > > > > > > The failure you have also seems to come from a -a argument of pkg > > > register which is unused and will disappear from next version of > > > pkgng. > > > > > > Can you send the the manifest (should in the > > > ${WORKDIR}/.metadir/+MANIFEST please? > > > > > > regards, > > > Bapt > >=20 > > I have reported the same a while ago, the backtrace seems identical. > >=20 > > https://groups.google.com/group/mailing.freebsd.ports/browse_thread/thr= ead/191ec99e36fb2536/bd8719c3370e98e7?show_docid=3Dbd8719c3370e98e7 > >=20 > >=20 > > Regards, > > George > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 > Oh, I missed that one, in your case it is not running in a chroot, is > it? strange is that I'm able to build 9.0-RELEASE i386 packages on > pointyhat... >=20 > regards, > Bapt I'm sorry, but I forgot to add that I did build ports with the option WITH_PKGNG=3Dyes in /etc/make.conf From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 12:44:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB25106564A; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:44:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from geo.liaskos@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568F48FC1A; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so1170598qcs.13 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 05:44:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=tXJMIDO97rlU1bh5sx2hFOCQqsWgExTv/d//PMotELc=; b=MaGED1nze0wgejzTZE8vaGcE5BB6V9PuL4HSdFsV7+MEdM8GBCyubXaKHt6vzHpsGa 3hTjtKQtyEB6IpHYPIlDvpA2ht2uXrnM0hmZ+IQ2TjwsyzhPwFsH1DNSayrN36tCKc+M kXsxDVDFjHqKxCVQPu2FpxxZOU2swyWeUUZnY9VuveEWsp7VcZDVaRuKNuWHt9CdCjrn bR/a9nhxg53RwBkVwfkL1cospRpfZpxYHfz8sH2q3/8sUyxs+gok6i5umMib4EVYiNgv FcCm1zdCdPNoJ+rcJvMzfEEPGKYwbcwqwDse+guDChhrSIRnVI3Bn+G/vBU8u/uBscTC QApA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.207.4 with SMTP id fw4mr3837913qab.82.1339677887749; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 05:44:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.213.8 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 05:44:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120614113937.GZ60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120613221745.23cdf52d@nonamehost> <20120613221043.GS60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120614113937.GZ60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:44:47 +0300 Message-ID: From: George Liaskos To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Ivan Klymenko , dan@langille.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg is segmentation fault with of the cross-compile port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:44:54 -0000 > Oh, I missed that one, in your case it is not running in a chroot, is it? It's not, it's a vm under vbox. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 12:50:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE760106564A; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:50:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@tormail.org) Received: from server2.allsitecontrol.com (server2.allsitecontrol.com [63.143.36.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28518FC08; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:50:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tor21.anonymizer.ccc.de ([31.172.30.4]:53096 helo=internal.tormail.org) by server2.allsitecontrol.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sf9VA-003UW8-SP; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:50:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tormail.org; s=tm; h=Message-Id:X-TorMail-User:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=woaYU83LmiYfwg3r2FMvroaRHCKWPiLc9sZ7Cl6IbIw=; b=VD7uHirR9vEIFZvohbe23WY8LVTyzmG0pjpQhMIIAXLiirhWvJC2AHj7wWEKgdZ3a+cESQsB3JVyDprgK4ZIZy3czPcxOFBFfCoukv/oTsHNURDYSAa1SM3srIxC0xt1xU1ZSjHskkP1CDaK7wpb0Pf6IOSJGQpSP5n0Gyx+wbY=; Received: from jbeich by internal.tormail.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Sf9TI-0006O2-8s; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:48:22 +0000 From: Jan Beich To: Andriy Gapon In-Reply-To: <4FD8624F.6080104@FreeBSD.org> (Andriy Gapon's message of "Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:50:07 +0300") Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:48:28 -0300 References: <4FD8624F.6080104@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-TorMail-User: jbeich Message-Id: <1Sf9TI-0006O2-8s@internal.tormail.org> X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server2.allsitecontrol.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tormail.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sanity-config issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:50:25 -0000 Andriy Gapon writes: > In some ports I am getting an error message about how make doesn't know how to > make sanity-config after exiting from config menu. > I see that there is > @${MAKE} sanity-config > line at the end of the config target script. > > I use WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj and I noticed that e.g. in the case of > mail/thunderbird port the make command was being run from > /usr/obj/usr/ports/mail/thunderbird. > > My workaround was to prepend "cd ${.CURDIR};" before the make command. > I see that this is a popular theme in bsd.port.mk, but I am not sure why it is > needed and if my workaround is actually correct. I can confirm your workaround also works for broken fetch-url{,all}-list target when MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX and WRKDIPREFIX share directory, e.g. $ cd devel/gmake $ env -i make fetch-urlall-list http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/make/make-3.82.tar.bz2 ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/make/make-3.82.tar.bz2 http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/gnu/gnu/make/make-3.82.tar.bz2 http://mirrors.kernel.org/gnu/make/make-3.82.tar.bz2 ftp://ftp.kddlabs.co.jp/GNU/make/make-3.82.tar.bz2 ftp://ftp.dti.ad.jp/pub/GNU/make/make-3.82.tar.bz2 http://ring.nict.go.jp/archives/GNU/make/make-3.82.tar.bz2 ftp://ftp.mirrorservice.org/sites/ftp.gnu.org/gnu/make/make-3.82.tar.bz2 ftp://ftp.informatik.hu-berlin.de/pub/gnu/gnu/make/make-3.82.tar.bz2 ftp://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/mirror/ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/make/make-3.82.tar.bz2 http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/gnu/prep/make/make-3.82.tar.bz2 ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/make-3.82.tar.bz2 $ mkdir -p $(env -i WRKDIRPREFIX=/tmp make -V WRKDIR) $ env -i MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/tmp make fetch-urlall-list make: don't know how to make fetch-url-list-int. Stop *** [fetch-urlall-list] Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gmake. > > Hope that this is useful. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 13:23:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B8D10656B0 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:23:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1CA8FC17 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:23:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.50]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67A1A70A9D for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:22:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 23757 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2012 13:22:57 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 4104, pid: 8453, t: 0.1551s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 14 Jun 2012 13:22:57 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3BF233C1E; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:22:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id AA4133984C; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:22:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Lars Eighner References: Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:22:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Lars Eighner's message of "Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:24:31 -0500 (CDT)") Message-ID: <44obomt4d1.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Xscreensaver conflicts X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:23:07 -0000 Lars Eighner writes: > xscreensaver-gnome-hacks will not install if xscreensaver is installed > ("write files to the same place") > > gnome requires xscreensaver-gnome-hacks > > kde4 requires xscreensaver > > It appears to me that if you force pkg_delete of xscreensaver and install > xscreensaver-gnome-hacks first, you can reinstall xscreensaver without > complaints. > > I grepped UPDATING for xscreensaver without any hits and do not find this > documented. I suspect the conflicts line in the Makefile > xscreensave-gnome-hacks is not accurate. The pkg-plist files have a number of common entries, so my suspicion would be the opposite; that xscreensaver ought to have a corresponding CONFLICTS line. Gnome can be configured (by an option) to use xscreensaver, if I'm reading the Makefile correctly. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 21:06:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD74D106566C; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 21:06:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@FreeBSD.org) Received: from bsdevel2.freebsdnorth.com (bsdevel2.freebsdnorth.com [204.109.60.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6EC8FC12; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 21:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.0.17] (241-9-178-69.static.gci.net [69.178.9.241]) by bsdevel2.freebsdnorth.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 10DC2170BC; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 21:04:05 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FDA523A.9030801@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:06:02 -0800 From: Beech Rintoul User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "James Wade (Phurix)" References: <201206141830.q5EIUANs057392@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201206141830.q5EIUANs057392@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Beech Rintoul Subject: Re: ports/169054: Can't install irc/eggdrop X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: beech@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 21:06:09 -0000 On 6/14/2012 10:30 AM, James Wade (Phurix) wrote: > The following reply was made to PR ports/169054; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: "James Wade (Phurix)" > To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org > Cc: > Subject: Re: ports/169054: Can't install irc/eggdrop > Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:05:34 +0100 > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > --------------070204040909070603050005 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > The bigger issue here is the SSL patch, it's unofficial. > > The advise from the vendor is that using SSL patches are a bad idea. > > http://www.eggheads.org/news/2011/05/25/39 > > Instead the port should switch to eggdrop1.8-snapshot (development but, > supports SSL) or eggdrop1.6.20 (latest but, no SSL support). > > I tried to contact beech@freebsd.org , but > received no reply, has this port become unmaintained? > > --------------070204040909070603050005 > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > > > > > The bigger issue here is the SSL patch, it's unofficial. >

>
>
The advise from the vendor is that using SSL patches are a bad > idea.
>

>
> >

>
>
Instead the port should switch to eggdrop1.8-snapshot > (development but, supports SSL) or eggdrop1.6.20 (latest but, no > SSL support).
>

>
>
I tried to contact beech@freebsd.org, > but received no reply, has this port become unmaintained?
> > > > --------------070204040909070603050005-- I have ported 1.8 to irc/eggdrop-devel. I will update the other to 1.6.21 and drop the rooty patch. Upstream has discontinued all support for the patch as it's very buggy. If you need ssl support try the -devel version. Comments are welcome. Beech -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - beech@FreeBSD.org /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/9.0R/announce.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 22:47:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA301065670 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:47:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C475E8FC0C for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:47:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werg1 with SMTP id g1so2111430wer.13 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:47:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DyiHbpeIHVgk4+ald6JE/Lzb6cTvMWEMzAyUH3LbrUQ=; b=yQTWhfCoaEr+7pdeHBY8pNvdIsi1U79OIxSUfi37wT02juexl3fYJScX19CpbFAwNq abGWQQ5btXa/McmNsYMCgfQdR/1SIDD8695TuYyVq7f4Ws9B85qG8A4JbezX06h15GEF WgRNUal7YagTD+O96hXsUrZ+ei8XFhE+2QLMZZceJCQiaGC/uZAuFlVTZBmY9XngOrK7 UhkfCSFxWJMDyb7djoxi1CTAjG9ojt2aI/hqIf1Yxyg7gfIiQmF+P1t3j7Us6VhCymJc /kS4kiHJ3YBbeqYQWifmnZa2mbUXk5K1gkU14nWTOJc7h2mBX4IFUJymlQE+LGohCh7n xxyg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.106.137 with SMTP id gu9mr7844208wib.8.1339714071615; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:47:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.155.4 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:47:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <44obomt4d1.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <44obomt4d1.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:47:51 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: Lowell Gilbert Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports , Lars Eighner Subject: Re: Xscreensaver conflicts X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:47:53 -0000 On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Lars Eighner writes: > >> xscreensaver-gnome-hacks will not install if xscreensaver is installed >> ("write files to the same place") >> >> gnome requires xscreensaver-gnome-hacks >> >> kde4 requires xscreensaver >> >> It appears to me that if you force pkg_delete of xscreensaver and instal= l >> xscreensaver-gnome-hacks first, you can reinstall xscreensaver without >> complaints. >> >> I grepped UPDATING for xscreensaver without any hits and do not find thi= s >> documented. =C2=A0I suspect the conflicts line in the Makefile >> xscreensave-gnome-hacks is not accurate. > > The pkg-plist files have a number of common entries, so my suspicion > would be the opposite; that xscreensaver ought to have a corresponding > CONFLICTS line. > > Gnome can be configured (by an option) to use xscreensaver, if I'm > reading the Makefile correctly. You are right. You may not install both xscreensaver and xscreensaver-gnome-hacks. By default, gnome uses xscreensaver-gnome which pulls in xscreensaver-gnome-hacks. xscreensaver and xscreensaver-gnome-hacks should both declare the other as CONFLICTs. They are slightly different flavors of the same thing. This really should have been sent to gnome@. The folks there would have probably confimed the situation immediately and, if they have a commit bit, might have fixed it. Please open a PR for this so it will be fixed. --=20 R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 23:07:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AF41065673 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 23:07:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-src@helfman.org) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A6948FC0C for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 23:07:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadv36 with SMTP id v36so3377616dad.13 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 16:07:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to:x-operating-system:organization :x-living-the-dream:x-pgp-fingerprint:x-pgp-key:user-agent :x-gm-message-state; bh=utZAgERFPDoF0xp52ycohKQSGztbbN7+fNiMqlBaftM=; b=SHYDfRZq60QQ0NApsOogvfjNQIrN2SpmlRg8O4zOmvDH6vbW+jTjSUYcx9UvoE/Ypl JkZR2eXKzZ7BBMvTYrIs9SlysmpJPKcLtHv9C6qsmdIKgGLAkjEHcM1DZs2P3V0qAK+Y Hjcdyp9r3QR7Q5yRgfCcvF7nV3Bi69qsmi4cs7eNxoewKwT7TEvZPIxrBfEWS/M4Ba3f 3LBrUOW1o8hFZ9Mv6WoCYCaYq5UYfnj0sFx0RI+WaRrdVem0/tVFftD0yHTIpzrFD9EE cqKHuRcvX6WomTTkSCH3HSY7w93zRZpadW7OQ71dQqHX/O/sMT4evBTJ4WZMkcVeWapW PXAA== Received: by 10.68.217.229 with SMTP id pb5mr12754631pbc.20.1339715272906; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 16:07:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dormouse.experts-exchange.com ([72.29.164.238]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ku7sm10999300pbc.31.2012.06.14.16.07.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 14 Jun 2012 16:07:51 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Jason Helfman Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 16:06:17 -0700 From: Jason Helfman To: Baptiste Daroussin Message-ID: <20120614230617.GT26321@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> References: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> <20120614080633.GV60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed In-Reply-To: <20120614080633.GV60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE amd64 Organization: The FreeBSD Project, http://www.freebsd.org X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! X-PGP-FingerPrint: 8E0D C457 9A0F C91C 23F3 0454 2059 9A63 4150 D3DC X-PGP-Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh/jgh.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkSxG0IiEw5sCksXNWyfnxTYYTsssArBKsRrSF1YDMt7UL+FOo3FmZnDCi1aRf89tN2pK21 Cc: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-ports Subject: Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 23:07:56 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:14:52AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin thus spake: >On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 04:21:16PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> After recent mention in this list that UNIQUENAME is not actually a >> unique name for each port and how obviously non-sensical that is, plus >> how it causes various problems with OPTIONS processing and how having a >> proper UNIQUENAME will facilitate the new sub-package functionality >> currently on the drawing board. >> >> So, here are some patches: >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/uniquenames.diff >> >> There's also some data on the effect these have on OPTIONSFILE and >> UNIQUENAME values per port in >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/before/* >> http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/after/* >> >> Summarizing the changes: >> >> * UNIQUENAME is now unique per port, and is primarily derived from >> the port directory name. >> >> * Where the port directory name isn't unique (eg. accessibility/orca >> vs graphics/orca) there is a new UNIQUEPREFIX variable to >> distinguish the affected ports. This is set for all the LANG >> specific category ports (arabic, chinese, french, german, hebrew, >> hungarian, japanese, korean, polish, portuguese, russian, >> ukranian, vietnamese) to the standard 2 character abbreviation for >> that LANG. Otherwise it is only set for the specific ports where >> there is a directory name collision, usually based on the category >> names. >> >> * To avoid accidental non-uniqueness, UNIQUENAME should be treated >> as a read-only variable by port maintainers. UNIQUEPREFIX should >> only be set where necessary to resolve conflicts. All instances of >> ports setting UNIQUENAME have been removed: in the majority of >> cases, this turned out to be a no-op as the new UNIQUENAME turned >> out to be the same as what most ports were previously overriding >> it to. >> >> * The way UNIQUENAME is defined means that it doesn't now change >> depending on the version of python, ruby or apache installed on a >> machine. >> >> * UNIQUENAME will have changed for numerous ports -- consequently >> port OPTIONFILEs may well have changed location. By default now, >> each port should have an individual OPTIONFILE location. This >> has removed a number of accidental cases of different (maybe >> completely unrelated) ports sharing the same OPTIONSFILE. >> >> * If you do want to share the same OPTIONSFILE between several >> different ports, you can modify OPTIONSFILE directly or there is >> now a new OPTIONS_DIR variable allowing a simple way for you to >> override the location: OPTIONSFILE is redefined as: >> >> OPTIONSFILE= ${PORT_DBDIR}/${OPTIONS_DIR}/options >> >> with OPTIONS_DIR defaulting (as before) to UNIQUENAME unless >> overriden. See databases/postgresql91-server for an example. >> >> * Other things that may be affected: ports with USE_LDCONFIG or >> USE_LDCONFIG32 can have ldconfig data written to a different >> location. This shouldn't make any user-visible change. >> Per-port options settings (OPTIONSng-style) in /etc/make.conf >> may need to be modified. >> >> Please test. Comments, corrections and bug reports will be most welcome. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Matthew >> >> -- >> Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. >> PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey >> >> >> > >Thank you very much for the patch, it solves a problem that sticks for way too >long in the ports tree: the problem with options files. > >It also solve another problem which is really important when dealing with binary >packages and will allow to simplify the life of pkgng development: we would for >real get a unique identifier for a package!!!, before for we were workarounding >the problem considering origin as our unique identifier which "worked" but no >that good, it was hard to track a package which was moved (no MOVED isn't an >ideal solution to track them in full binary world) > >The other thing that it could solve for binary only world if that if people from >python ruby perl and others uses always the same uniquename for their default >version, then it will be easy to move from python26 as a default to python27 as >a default in full binary environment with no manual intervention from the user >and no complex hacks to figure it out in the package tool. > >Last but no least once it is done the LATEST_LINK overwrite could die, and the >feature associated could just use LATEST_LINK. > >Please do test this patch comment on it and improve it. > >regards, >Bapt Great patch. I've done some testing, but was aware of this issue, and even have raised this with bapt during his implementation of optionsng to see if he knew of this issue. From what I can see, this also takes care of this PR, but also adds some needed consistency that has long been removed. And by looking up the pr, I see you already have found it :) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/148637 I humbly suggest to move this PR to an open state. Great work, Matthew! Thanks! - -jgh - -- Jason Helfman FreeBSD Committer | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh | The Power To Serve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP2m5pAAoJECBZmmNBUNPcmoEIAJdkYJ+BnpttWtENMZffrCbc VRHQWV47DmqNGW38KxuWzs1M0yoyD319vJ+5Znr14+IcrIww4iDoDNpsvjAw1NWC xS4BrXL3g0Uh8CL2QQzM3m1Rx9Zb7JBHERiJxBidVESrNSaRrLDlT9vbWd9Liz9r 2qh1g9z22PiMhtlDqU9WWzU3Nq1HW4OR2AFjv6SuW5Va6CRRvgJIPkL0vUoK+QKH Lhz4DaIzYq09ScN2kYLD+MSWuLRHzGSMtLzwVUwJSvyp5w5AMC9UoNwoaTt7RPZd GubpGf6wy1r9quPB77Cj6RFq9DqqZN9EetspwxS9y8xshX671uKPBRtwS3PcYI8= =7R9I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 23:50:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66570106566B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 23:50:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@brightstar.bomgardner.net) Received: from brightstar.bomgardner.net (brightstar.bomgardner.net [63.229.207.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D628FC12 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 23:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from brightstar.bomgardner.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brightstar.bomgardner.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C65882B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 18:50:39 -0500 (CDT) From: "Gene" To: "FreeBsd-ports" Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 18:50:39 -0500 Message-Id: <20120614234727.M12036@brightstar.bomgardner.net> X-Mailer: OpenWebMail 2.53 X-OriginatingIP: 192.168.0.2 (fbsd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Subject: mail/mailman install problem python 2.6 import urandom X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 23:50:06 -0000 Hi All: Running 8.1 AMD64. I had python 2.6.8 installed. After upgrading several ports, which installed python 2.7.3_2, scripts requiring 2.6 fail due to an inability to import urandom from os. Now I'm not a python person by any means, but I was wondering where its trying to find urandom. Could it be looking for 'dev/urandom'? Or perhaps urandom from ports/math/mpc? In a few scripts I've changed 2.6 to 2.7 and they seem to work. Did installing 2.7 alongside 2.6 break something? Specifically, right now I'm trying to install mail/mailman port which looks for python 2.6. It terminates with the following: ================================================ Compiling /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/versions.py ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "bin/update", line 50, in from Mailman import Utils File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Utils.py", line 32, in import cgi File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/cgi.py", line 49, in import mimetools File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/mimetools.py", line 6, in import tempfile File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/tempfile.py", line 34, in from random import Random as _Random File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/random.py", line 47, in from os import urandom as _urandom ImportError: cannot import name urandom ================================================= I've googled and searched archives and all I can find is ubuntu problems related to a virtual machine. Does anyone know what's going on? Thanks, Gene -- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 04:55:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D13106566B; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 04:55:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3085D14EF3C; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 04:55:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FDAC047.9030300@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 21:55:35 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120611 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Beich References: <4FD8624F.6080104@FreeBSD.org> <1Sf9TI-0006O2-8s@internal.tormail.org> In-Reply-To: <1Sf9TI-0006O2-8s@internal.tormail.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: sanity-config issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 04:55:37 -0000 On 06/14/2012 05:48, Jan Beich wrote: > I use WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj As I've mentioned to you a non-zero number of times, this is a bad idea. The fact that it either works and/or can be made to work sometimes, notwithstanding. -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 05:01:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFC3106564A; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:01:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2981554A2; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FDAC18C.4000504@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:01:00 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120611 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Beich References: <4FD8624F.6080104@FreeBSD.org> <1Sf9TI-0006O2-8s@internal.tormail.org> <4FDAC047.9030300@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4FDAC047.9030300@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andriy Gapon , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sanity-config issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:01:01 -0000 On 06/14/2012 21:55, Doug Barton wrote: > On 06/14/2012 05:48, Jan Beich wrote: >> I use WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj > > As I've mentioned to you ... where "you" == Andriy. > a non-zero number of times, this is a bad idea. > The fact that it either works and/or can be made to work sometimes, > notwithstanding. -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 06:26:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A06106564A; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 06:26:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344278FC08; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 06:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id JAA16082; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:26:36 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1SfPzP-000J4Q-Jn; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:26:35 +0300 Message-ID: <4FDAD599.2000205@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:26:33 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120613 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4FD8624F.6080104@FreeBSD.org> <1Sf9TI-0006O2-8s@internal.tormail.org> <4FDAC047.9030300@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4FDAC047.9030300@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Jan Beich Subject: Re: sanity-config issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 06:26:44 -0000 on 15/06/2012 07:55 Doug Barton said the following: > On 06/14/2012 05:48, Jan Beich wrote: >> I use WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj > > As I've mentioned to you a non-zero number of times, this is a bad idea. > The fact that it either works and/or can be made to work sometimes, > notwithstanding. You never explained why. Perhaps, the time has come? I personally do not see any problem with that setting. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 07:05:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93DC1106566C; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:05:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA91152CA9; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FDADEA8.3090507@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:05:12 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120611 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andriy Gapon References: <4FD8624F.6080104@FreeBSD.org> <1Sf9TI-0006O2-8s@internal.tormail.org> <4FDAC047.9030300@FreeBSD.org> <4FDAD599.2000205@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4FDAD599.2000205@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Jan Beich Subject: Re: sanity-config issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:05:13 -0000 On 06/14/2012 23:26, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 15/06/2012 07:55 Doug Barton said the following: >> On 06/14/2012 05:48, Jan Beich wrote: >>> I use WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj >> >> As I've mentioned to you a non-zero number of times, this is a bad idea. >> The fact that it either works and/or can be made to work sometimes, >> notwithstanding. > > You never explained why. Actually I've explained it several times, you just don't like the explanation. The problems described in this thread are a good start. -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 07:06:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33418106566B; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:06:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D768FC16; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:06:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id KAA16500; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:06:35 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1SfQc7-000J6W-K7; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:06:35 +0300 Message-ID: <4FDADEFA.1030607@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:06:34 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120613 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4FD8624F.6080104@FreeBSD.org> <1Sf9TI-0006O2-8s@internal.tormail.org> <4FDAC047.9030300@FreeBSD.org> <4FDAD599.2000205@FreeBSD.org> <4FDADEA8.3090507@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4FDADEA8.3090507@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Jan Beich Subject: Re: sanity-config issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:06:38 -0000 on 15/06/2012 10:05 Doug Barton said the following: > On 06/14/2012 23:26, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 15/06/2012 07:55 Doug Barton said the following: >>> On 06/14/2012 05:48, Jan Beich wrote: >>>> I use WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj >>> >>> As I've mentioned to you a non-zero number of times, this is a bad idea. >>> The fact that it either works and/or can be made to work sometimes, >>> notwithstanding. >> >> You never explained why. > > Actually I've explained it several times, you just don't like the > explanation. The problems described in this thread are a good start. > Could you please point me to those past explanations? Or repeat them again, if that's not too much trouble. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 07:11:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FCCD106564A; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:11:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFC6152773; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FDAE01F.30903@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:11:27 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120611 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andriy Gapon References: <4FD8624F.6080104@FreeBSD.org> <1Sf9TI-0006O2-8s@internal.tormail.org> <4FDAC047.9030300@FreeBSD.org> <4FDAD599.2000205@FreeBSD.org> <4FDADEA8.3090507@FreeBSD.org> <4FDADEFA.1030607@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4FDADEFA.1030607@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Jan Beich Subject: Re: sanity-config issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:11:28 -0000 On 06/15/2012 00:06, Andriy Gapon wrote: > Could you please point me to those past explanations? If the fact that using it actually causes things to break (as described in this thread) isn't sufficient, I have no idea what else I could say that would help you. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 07:13:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198F1106564A; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:13:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A488FC12; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:13:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id KAA16565; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:13:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1SfQj1-000J6r-J2; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:13:43 +0300 Message-ID: <4FDAE0A6.6070706@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:13:42 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120613 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4FD8624F.6080104@FreeBSD.org> <1Sf9TI-0006O2-8s@internal.tormail.org> <4FDAC047.9030300@FreeBSD.org> <4FDAD599.2000205@FreeBSD.org> <4FDADEA8.3090507@FreeBSD.org> <4FDADEFA.1030607@FreeBSD.org> <4FDAE01F.30903@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4FDAE01F.30903@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Jan Beich Subject: Re: sanity-config issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:13:46 -0000 on 15/06/2012 10:11 Doug Barton said the following: > On 06/15/2012 00:06, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> Could you please point me to those past explanations? > > If the fact that using it actually causes things to break (as described > in this thread) isn't sufficient, I have no idea what else I could say > that would help you. A technical explanation would. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 07:13:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DABFB1065670 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:13:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@amy.id.au) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0A68FC14 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so1949135vbm.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:13:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=11uAL/Hl7iGO92X+qfVz0bbusYy4zBN9aYOzm3rF6Qg=; b=Ljib34KQb9CoqHVs6hTvwOPa2Fwip71k3gQvmkbtjZx6dShhNYZt88zDCTENDsGaGD yXvahD/ZX7gbEo6fUtLi2Bjul9LebPvVWoaT4w92Xrlk3WnJuXauC1rQ9HZA0F+6y6rj XRJZXVu7kudVdJWH6nQTUIu9+nTRfk8xJ8WgFTVIDfqA7ArX3tMO15Sky/UqEQyYwg68 sw/zU68uNxMamFYbS/nUfinEELX+9/iIMoomLwfYfUlOsxV1e1R6hj6DStywnDm4Rl9v sEKi+VG74LUJrxB+JqxgAnuz/Sfl46XCn1nU8a9cE5NYXk2Xyloaawchs9pxm7Jbn0qu NEgQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.20.143 with SMTP id n15mr2028918vde.112.1339744426395; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:13:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.112.163 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:13:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [121.208.208.49] Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:13:46 +1000 Message-ID: From: Kris Amy To: dab@rj45.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnKJtUPs0JY9GkL5IJFa1AV/BDKGtYDmUperEhyBzHWHt+hoAFcalNAfPqlWPS4YvhX19UY Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: sabnzbdplus-0.6.15 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:13:48 -0000 Hi, Just touching base to see if you were aware that 0.7.0 has been released. If you could update the port when you get a chance (have time), that would be excellent. Cheers, Kris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 07:32:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08AB71065675 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:32:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dab@rj45.org) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA7A8FC1E for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:32:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eabm6 with SMTP id m6so914686eab.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:32:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=lltwOujRVS0FcPHlrS3AH6vGZgE/VX0rW6sfNSNru1Y=; b=VOCfqY3l6jkQ07ZhZQif4jrR1yO9EsmYMQRHzlJBQafxGJvaX553RsDVU6taKjC3Yk Ho7P1jN5HkSjAAMJ3hk0WEbsp8egLp+i4AwhcL3IVEe83iNh49Q3zeOx5pWjYVLcg/6h TMuIdzc+4jWQBprSGuBW8QXqotnUlRWW/jBdIvsTWZ2dfE77RDS88/w9ZrICWBcapeur LOIvCpuJd2f2aV4SX1k9KeYGeS8yy/pXZMrLyBRe02ejbSIPsi1yTU6s8oa2JBL60Wa1 2QepzTZkllkbW863cFgHzBPCvvtOFOfgKA+kGzrPF6YHeYojjHHpzFF/p1YPHQ1nEsEE qwnQ== Received: by 10.14.186.142 with SMTP id w14mr521669eem.95.1339745571082; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:32:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u16sm27545379eeb.16.2012.06.15.00.32.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:32:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so2591306wgb.31 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:32:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.81.36 with SMTP id w4mr1974761wix.16.1339745568734; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:32:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.135.144 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:32:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:32:48 -0700 Message-ID: From: David Brooks To: Kris Amy X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkOvi2Hmk5QfxB+JU/T2Sp7D9ommt85sM6/HeWEaPOkXHLGVl2YHWBKVKZFNpNPofsr8YdP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: sabnzbdplus-0.6.15 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:32:53 -0000 Thanks for the heads up. I've been out of town on business all week, and we're coming up on the close of the quarter, so I've been a bit busy. I'll do my best to get it ported soon, though I expect it may take longer than usual given that it's a "larger" update, the extent of which I don't yet know. If you happen to get it working on your end and can submit a patch against the current port, I'll be happy to test it and approve it. Otherwise, I may be a little while. Let me know your results. -db. On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Kris Amy wrote: > Hi, > > Just touching base to see if you were aware that 0.7.0 has been released. > > If you could update the port when you get a chance (have time), that > would be excellent. > > Cheers, > Kris > -- "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -- RFC1925 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 07:44:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B36B106564A; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:44:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43C78FC0A; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:44:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5F7i5JF005766 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 15 Jun 2012 08:44:05 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q5F7i5JF005766 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q5F7i5JF005766; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none Message-ID: <4FDAE7BF.6020606@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 08:43:59 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120601 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Helfman References: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> <20120614080633.GV60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120614230617.GT26321@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> In-Reply-To: <20120614230617.GT26321@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig964C109A18D8B3C5D34B6390" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , freebsd-ports Subject: Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:44:16 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig964C109A18D8B3C5D34B6390 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 15/06/2012 00:06, Jason Helfman wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:14:52AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin thus spake= : >> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 04:21:16PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> After recent mention in this list that UNIQUENAME is not actually a >>> unique name for each port and how obviously non-sensical that is, plu= s >>> how it causes various problems with OPTIONS processing and how having= a >>> proper UNIQUENAME will facilitate the new sub-package functionality >>> currently on the drawing board. >>> >>> So, here are some patches: >>> >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/uniquenames.diff >>> >>> There's also some data on the effect these have on OPTIONSFILE and >>> UNIQUENAME values per port in >>> >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/before/* >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/after/* >>> >>> Summarizing the changes: >>> >>> * UNIQUENAME is now unique per port, and is primarily derived from= >>> the port directory name. >>> >>> * Where the port directory name isn't unique (eg. accessibility/or= ca >>> vs graphics/orca) there is a new UNIQUEPREFIX variable to >>> distinguish the affected ports. This is set for all the LANG >>> specific category ports (arabic, chinese, french, german, hebrew= , >>> hungarian, japanese, korean, polish, portuguese, russian, >>> ukranian, vietnamese) to the standard 2 character abbreviation f= or >>> that LANG. Otherwise it is only set for the specific ports wher= e >>> there is a directory name collision, usually based on the catego= ry >>> names. >>> >>> * To avoid accidental non-uniqueness, UNIQUENAME should be treated= >>> as a read-only variable by port maintainers. UNIQUEPREFIX shoul= d >>> only be set where necessary to resolve conflicts. All instances= of >>> ports setting UNIQUENAME have been removed: in the majority of >>> cases, this turned out to be a no-op as the new UNIQUENAME turne= d >>> out to be the same as what most ports were previously overriding= >>> it to. >>> >>> * The way UNIQUENAME is defined means that it doesn't now change >>> depending on the version of python, ruby or apache installed on = a >>> machine. >>> >>> * UNIQUENAME will have changed for numerous ports -- consequently >>> port OPTIONFILEs may well have changed location. By default now= , >>> each port should have an individual OPTIONFILE location. This >>> has removed a number of accidental cases of different (maybe >>> completely unrelated) ports sharing the same OPTIONSFILE. >>> >>> * If you do want to share the same OPTIONSFILE between several >>> different ports, you can modify OPTIONSFILE directly or there is= >>> now a new OPTIONS_DIR variable allowing a simple way for you to >>> override the location: OPTIONSFILE is redefined as: >>> >>> OPTIONSFILE=3D ${PORT_DBDIR}/${OPTIONS_DIR}/options >>> >>> with OPTIONS_DIR defaulting (as before) to UNIQUENAME unless >>> overriden. See databases/postgresql91-server for an example. >>> >>> * Other things that may be affected: ports with USE_LDCONFIG or >>> USE_LDCONFIG32 can have ldconfig data written to a different >>> location. This shouldn't make any user-visible change. >>> Per-port options settings (OPTIONSng-style) in /etc/make.conf >>> may need to be modified. >>> >>> Please test. Comments, corrections and bug reports will be most welc= ome. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Matthew >>> >>> -- >>> Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. >>> PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey >>> >>> >>> >=20 >> Thank you very much for the patch, it solves a problem that sticks for= way too >> long in the ports tree: the problem with options files. >=20 >> It also solve another problem which is really important when dealing w= ith binary >> packages and will allow to simplify the life of pkgng development: we = would for >> real get a unique identifier for a package!!!, before for we were work= arounding >> the problem considering origin as our unique identifier which "worked"= but no >> that good, it was hard to track a package which was moved (no MOVED is= n't an >> ideal solution to track them in full binary world) >=20 >> The other thing that it could solve for binary only world if that if p= eople from >> python ruby perl and others uses always the same uniquename for their = default >> version, then it will be easy to move from python26 as a default to py= thon27 as >> a default in full binary environment with no manual intervention from = the user >> and no complex hacks to figure it out in the package tool. >=20 >> Last but no least once it is done the LATEST_LINK overwrite could die,= and the >> feature associated could just use LATEST_LINK. >=20 >> Please do test this patch comment on it and improve it. >=20 >> regards, >> Bapt >=20 > Great patch. I've done some testing, but was aware of this issue, and e= ven > have raised this with bapt during his implementation of optionsng to se= e if > he knew of this issue. >=20 > From what I can see, this also takes care of this PR, but also adds so= me > needed consistency that has long been removed. >=20 > And by looking up the pr, I see you already have found it :) >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/148637 >=20 > I humbly suggest to move this PR to an open state. >=20 > Great work, Matthew! >=20 > Thanks! > -jgh If people want to get a feeling for the changes involved in this patch, I've put together a script to scan the ports tree and highlight UNIQUENAME (and port name) conflicts. http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/uniquecheck No output is good, unless you turn up the verbosity. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig964C109A18D8B3C5D34B6390 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/a58UACgkQ8Mjk52CukIy4wQCbBe3zHzNjlXF7615sntwwh/Qd 6kIAnAk6FxRyt9Q9IxasmyY4tfey6YKZ =+KDW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig964C109A18D8B3C5D34B6390-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 09:01:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48EB91065782; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:01:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C828FC16; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5F910MH005368; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:01:00 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5F90xBo005339; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:00:59 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:00:55 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20120615090055.GE98264@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> <20120614080633.GV60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120614230617.GT26321@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <4FDAE7BF.6020606@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tMbDGjvJuJijemkf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FDAE7BF.6020606@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Jason Helfman , freebsd-ports Subject: Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:01:00 -0000 --tMbDGjvJuJijemkf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 08:43:59AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 15/06/2012 00:06, Jason Helfman wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:14:52AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin thus spake: > >> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 04:21:16PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > >>> > >>> Dear all, > >>> > >>> After recent mention in this list that UNIQUENAME is not actually a > >>> unique name for each port and how obviously non-sensical that is, plus > >>> how it causes various problems with OPTIONS processing and how having= a > >>> proper UNIQUENAME will facilitate the new sub-package functionality > >>> currently on the drawing board. > >>> > >>> So, here are some patches: > >>> > >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/uniquenames.diff > >>> > >>> There's also some data on the effect these have on OPTIONSFILE and > >>> UNIQUENAME values per port in > >>> > >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/before/* > >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/after/* > >>> > >>> Summarizing the changes: > >>> > >>> * UNIQUENAME is now unique per port, and is primarily derived from > >>> the port directory name. > >>> > >>> * Where the port directory name isn't unique (eg. accessibility/or= ca > >>> vs graphics/orca) there is a new UNIQUEPREFIX variable to > >>> distinguish the affected ports. This is set for all the LANG > >>> specific category ports (arabic, chinese, french, german, hebrew, > >>> hungarian, japanese, korean, polish, portuguese, russian, > >>> ukranian, vietnamese) to the standard 2 character abbreviation f= or > >>> that LANG. Otherwise it is only set for the specific ports where > >>> there is a directory name collision, usually based on the catego= ry > >>> names. > >>> > >>> * To avoid accidental non-uniqueness, UNIQUENAME should be treated > >>> as a read-only variable by port maintainers. UNIQUEPREFIX should > >>> only be set where necessary to resolve conflicts. All instances= of > >>> ports setting UNIQUENAME have been removed: in the majority of > >>> cases, this turned out to be a no-op as the new UNIQUENAME turned > >>> out to be the same as what most ports were previously overriding > >>> it to. > >>> > >>> * The way UNIQUENAME is defined means that it doesn't now change > >>> depending on the version of python, ruby or apache installed on a > >>> machine. > >>> > >>> * UNIQUENAME will have changed for numerous ports -- consequently > >>> port OPTIONFILEs may well have changed location. By default now, > >>> each port should have an individual OPTIONFILE location. This > >>> has removed a number of accidental cases of different (maybe > >>> completely unrelated) ports sharing the same OPTIONSFILE. > >>> > >>> * If you do want to share the same OPTIONSFILE between several > >>> different ports, you can modify OPTIONSFILE directly or there is > >>> now a new OPTIONS_DIR variable allowing a simple way for you to > >>> override the location: OPTIONSFILE is redefined as: > >>> > >>> OPTIONSFILE=3D ${PORT_DBDIR}/${OPTIONS_DIR}/options > >>> > >>> with OPTIONS_DIR defaulting (as before) to UNIQUENAME unless > >>> overriden. See databases/postgresql91-server for an example. > >>> > >>> * Other things that may be affected: ports with USE_LDCONFIG or > >>> USE_LDCONFIG32 can have ldconfig data written to a different > >>> location. This shouldn't make any user-visible change. > >>> Per-port options settings (OPTIONSng-style) in /etc/make.conf > >>> may need to be modified. > >>> > >>> Please test. Comments, corrections and bug reports will be most welc= ome. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> > >>> Matthew > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. > >>> PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey > >>> > >>> > >>> > >=20 > >> Thank you very much for the patch, it solves a problem that sticks for= way too > >> long in the ports tree: the problem with options files. > >=20 > >> It also solve another problem which is really important when dealing w= ith binary > >> packages and will allow to simplify the life of pkgng development: we = would for > >> real get a unique identifier for a package!!!, before for we were work= arounding > >> the problem considering origin as our unique identifier which "worked"= but no > >> that good, it was hard to track a package which was moved (no MOVED is= n't an > >> ideal solution to track them in full binary world) > >=20 > >> The other thing that it could solve for binary only world if that if p= eople from > >> python ruby perl and others uses always the same uniquename for their = default > >> version, then it will be easy to move from python26 as a default to py= thon27 as > >> a default in full binary environment with no manual intervention from = the user > >> and no complex hacks to figure it out in the package tool. > >=20 > >> Last but no least once it is done the LATEST_LINK overwrite could die,= and the > >> feature associated could just use LATEST_LINK. > >=20 > >> Please do test this patch comment on it and improve it. > >=20 > >> regards, > >> Bapt > >=20 > > Great patch. I've done some testing, but was aware of this issue, and e= ven > > have raised this with bapt during his implementation of optionsng to se= e if > > he knew of this issue. > >=20 > > From what I can see, this also takes care of this PR, but also adds so= me > > needed consistency that has long been removed. > >=20 > > And by looking up the pr, I see you already have found it :) > >=20 > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/148637 > >=20 > > I humbly suggest to move this PR to an open state. > >=20 > > Great work, Matthew! > >=20 > > Thanks! > > -jgh >=20 > If people want to get a feeling for the changes involved in this patch, > I've put together a script to scan the ports tree and highlight > UNIQUENAME (and port name) conflicts. >=20 > http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/uniquecheck >=20 > No output is good, unless you turn up the verbosity. >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Matthew >=20 > --=20 > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 Get this script in Tools/scripts maybe after your patch gets in that can be useful! regards, Bapt --tMbDGjvJuJijemkf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/a+ccACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyJ9gCeIVknAhiSKH048DX4sl3kC93r fzcAn0RcGUqu+VSOOJPM+kR61j6LKAwE =e8z9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tMbDGjvJuJijemkf-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 09:23:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E369106566C for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:23:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB51F8FC1A for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:23:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsd.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.59] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SfSkS-0001ZW-21 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:23:20 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SfSkR-00027N-Uo for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:23:19 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5F9NJdx010966 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:23:19 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5F9NJwD010965 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:23:19 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bris.ac.uk using -f Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:23:19 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120615092319.GA10943@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Where's linux-mirror.org coming from? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:23:21 -0000 I maintain math/slatec. I see in http://people.freebsd.org/~ehaupt/distilator/math/slatec/ http://netlib.linux-mirror.org/slatec/guide 2012-06-15, 00:25:17 2012-05-27, 11:46:28 NXDOMAIN http://netlib.linux-mirror.org/blas/d1mach.f 2012-06-14, 22:15:50 2012-05-27, 13:55:49 NXDOMAIN http://netlib.linux-mirror.org/blas/i1mach.f 2012-06-14, 22:31:09 2012-05-27, 13:31:24 NXDOMAIN http://netlib.linux-mirror.org/slatec/slatec_src.tgz 2012-06-15, 00:02:27 2012-05-27, 12:07:32 NXDOMAIN http://netlib.linux-mirror.org/slatec/toc 2012-06-15, 00:17:26 2012-05-27, 12:47:51 NXDOMAIN http://netlib.linux-mirror.org/slatec/slatec_chk.tgz 2012-06-14, 22:39:27 2012-05-27, 14:45:41 NXDOMAIN http://netlib.linux-mirror.org/blas/r1mach.f 2012-06-15, 00:25:23 2012-05-27, 12:05:35 NXDOMAIN In my port I have MASTER_SITES= NL:slatec,blas which, according to bsd.sites.mk, does not include linux-mirror.org. In fact I can't find it in bsd.sites.mk at all. So where is it coming from? Thanks -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 09:55:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E617810656D4 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:55:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller23@insightbb.com) Received: from mail.insightbb.com (smtp1.insight.synacor.com [208.47.185.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18D58FC12 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:55:22 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=Jv2Gzhh1lwLFJeNB+3eGfgzFaKdMyzn3ez8cN0hwf/E= c=1 sm=0 a=jLN7EqiLvroA:10 a=yvGSKoXVuN5s2KbLCpkA:9 a=Q/oqmR4JO1zR3vNQamCQeQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp02.insight.synacor.com header.from=mueller23@insightbb.com; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: smtp02.insight.synacor.com smtp.mail=mueller23@insightbb.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (smtp02.insight.synacor.com: transitional domain insightbb.com does not designate 74.134.26.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.134.26.53] ([74.134.26.53:44768] helo=localhost) by mail.insightbb.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.40 r(29895/29896)) with ESMTP id 11/46-20291-A860BDF4; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:55:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:55:22 -0400 Message-ID: <11.46.20291.A860BDF4@smtp02.insight.synacor.com> From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: png-1.5.11 status? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:55:24 -0000 While checking the new packages/ports in NetBSD pkgsrc and FreeBSD ports, I noticed png-1.5.11 just added in NetBSD pkgsrc, which is usually behind FreeBSD ports, but not yet in FreeBSD ports (just ran "portsnap fetch update"). Not to be unduly impatient, but I don't want to upgrade a whole lot of ports as would be necessary with png-1.5.10 only to have to do it again just a day later. Maybe it's just a day away? I'm not that impatient. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 10:20:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB73F106564A for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:20:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E488FC16 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:20:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werg1 with SMTP id g1so2485543wer.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 03:20:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=Jg1xDmAOHFF9XK0BSjKK6gdKSUSlhyI+dJnzsHd60/c=; b=F58sGkUwszq8C9xEyRenjbmQOReITwf4cDWa5vzNp4DsgfFHmsvUyLXBx8xSXeKd0U Nist7XoOvqR8BMZvAAPkifP/hg8+6N2PwSwKpsdFJELrMavryidfuIBtmlTT083xHpJH RiqxcdEXN1QEFwLVFlRjQuBVf2cIxdh0PprFhsszaLmKiN3SVMkaMmpDuGuoJFU/lqW2 lPxcg2eXhuQ0tOpiVyPnekioWB531393Wm6eqBKn+Bh3ienwSXS2/8mcnkp/BqF7A5wK rlUUUtTFHbwjfjfTfcA1ZblwsxLIxXH4BPLP9Q2y/0YZ5WZb/Slu7/oXUXIMpyrIGNTK CcoQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.80.228 with SMTP id u4mr3270032wix.5.1339755624142; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 03:20:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.102.4 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 03:20:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 06:20:24 -0400 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Anton Shterenlikht Subject: Re: Where's linux-mirror.org coming from? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:20:25 -0000 > In my port I have > > MASTER_SITES= NL:slatec,blas > > which, according to bsd.sites.mk, does not > include linux-mirror.org. In fact I can't > find it in bsd.sites.mk at all. > So where is it coming from? I recently removed it from the Netlib master sites because of recent failures, so you needn't worry about it. (If service resumes and seems stable, I'll reinstate it.) The distilator results that you cite are based on a slightly older ports tree. Those entries will probably disappear soon, when the the ports tree that the distilator uses is updated, and the port is re-tested. b. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 15:36:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C38DF106564A for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnebdal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCBF8FC15 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:36:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so2972280yhg.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 08:36:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ks3hnFbIYvSKPUJcHaYXoRo5a706X0XacGTCZYqeI4w=; b=rJq64TEePi25jH9Db4qnAWyZhHGtBB7EXOk/9i8y326dLxO5bVXUITMJhRTuaWX83v H0L9ccTalP0vdsNFwV2N7xd8M1s9nwtobG1i1bOIhqiiTkRsrHOD4ovOSPmnut0LwqID bOiRxZffK3M+hUtVvnsLheCx0+Fi+WhEmzHs0Jul4qb3s68QWqYmaVX4wVSKqSsiw5ek +fbmQeepgs4Kpe4PicXnrduEr4VlGZeuId+HJjidpzX4EAm+ZOFHNA4VvoiAaqkbo1LF iBd/2GXu1QoI/5CZlfyxuPqJhs9PpRPRSJNuP0zG41PxdFdVeu3wLT93rWcRUcLFPUuY n2EA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.104.170 with SMTP id gf10mr2416847igb.52.1339774559422; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 08:35:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.136.1 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 08:35:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120614234727.M12036@brightstar.bomgardner.net> References: <20120614234727.M12036@brightstar.bomgardner.net> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:35:59 +0200 Message-ID: From: Daniel Nebdal To: Gene Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBsd-ports Subject: Re: mail/mailman install problem python 2.6 import urandom X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:36:03 -0000 That's slightly bizarre - urandom should be in the os module. Just to verif= y: mr16613: > uname -srm FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE amd64 mr16613: > python2.7 --version Python 2.7.3 mr16613: > python2.7 -c 'from os import urandom as _urandom ; print str(_urandom)' Out of curiosity, could you try something in python? Start python2.7 , and enter import os dir(os) That ought to display a long list of things in the os module, including ura= ndom. On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Gene wrot= e: > Hi All: > > =A0Running 8.1 AMD64. I had python 2.6.8 installed. After upgrading sever= al > =A0ports, which installed python 2.7.3_2, scripts requiring 2.6 fail due = to an > =A0inability to import urandom from os. > > =A0Now I'm not a python person by any means, but I was wondering where it= s > =A0trying to find urandom. Could it be looking for 'dev/urandom'? Or perh= aps > =A0urandom from ports/math/mpc? > > =A0In a few scripts I've changed 2.6 to 2.7 and they seem to work. Did > =A0installing 2.7 alongside 2.6 break something? > > =A0Specifically, right now I'm trying to install mail/mailman port which = looks > =A0for python 2.6. It terminates with the following: > > =A0=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > =A0Compiling /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/versions.py ... > =A0Traceback (most recent call last): > =A0File "bin/update", line 50, in > =A0 =A0from Mailman import Utils > =A0File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Utils.py", line 32, in > =A0 =A0import cgi > =A0File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/cgi.py", line 49, in > =A0 =A0import mimetools > =A0File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/mimetools.py", line 6, in > =A0 =A0import tempfile > =A0File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/tempfile.py", line 34, in > =A0 =A0from random import Random as _Random > =A0File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/random.py", line 47, in > =A0 =A0from os import urandom as _urandom > =A0ImportError: cannot import name urandom > =A0=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D > > =A0I've googled and searched archives and all I can find is ubuntu proble= ms > =A0related to a virtual machine. > > =A0Does anyone know what's going on? > > =A0Thanks, > =A0Gene > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 15:50:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0511065673; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:50:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71218FC14; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBDEB4.dip.t-dialin.net [93.203.222.180]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q5FFoR1k017623; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:50:28 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5FFoNww066847; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:50:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5FFo0Gh044990; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:50:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201206151550.q5FFo0Gh044990@fire.js.berklix.net> To: johans@FreeBSD.org From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Linux Unix Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/cv/ Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:50:00 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, "Julian H. Stacey" Subject: Mk macros & print/texinfo/distinfo variant SHA256 SIZE X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:50:30 -0000 Hi johans@FreeBSD.org & cc ports@ A 9.0-RELEASE ports fails on cd print/texinfo ; make fetch unless one imports newer values from current, (as I did in my http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/ports/gen/print/texinfo/distinfo.REL=ALL.diff ) But periodicaly patching distinfo with new SHA256 & SIZE is not a good solution as - We can only update values in /pub/FreeBSD/branches/-current/ports/ (as done already), but - The values are frozen at release time to whatever is exported by cvs -Q -R export -r RELEASE_8_0_0 ports - Periodically internet contents of 2 files texinfo.tex & texi2dvi will change while names remains the same, - Then along comes a user, trying to make fetch from a release, & it fails. So how best to modify Makefile to not break on size & sha256 of some but not all files ? The question can't be unique to this port, would a half way house be nice ? An Mk/bsd.port.mk macro to sniff at & warn but not error if certain values are wrong ? To support some shorter named version of eg: WARN_IF_NOT_SHA256 (texinfo.tex) = f506a97fe0ea0388c9b29653bd9b9ed8e188d3d649a9e9485e2e051bba47496e WARN_IF_NOT_SIZE (texinfo.tex) = 321252 WARN_IF_NOT_SHA256 (texi2dvi) = bf6fc2d85b52cde8e7919b5a379804a3d1eeaa95cb781c7daf79fd5f3cc8e6be WARN_IF_NOT_SIZE (texi2dvi) = 58102 I see Mk has: NO_CHECKSUM is a user variable and is not to be set in a port's Makefile. It's also too crude for this, as - the checksum of texinfo-4.13.tar.gz is invariant & should be checked. - if one let loose eg cd /some...release/ports ; make fetch one would want mots other checksums checked. current Mk/bsd.port.mk has # DISABLE_SIZE - Do not check the size of a distfile even if the SIZE field # has been specified in distinfo. This is useful # when using an alternate FETCH_CMD. I see no analagous DISABLE_SHA256 DISABLE_CHECKSUM Thoughts ? Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 15:54:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8424E1065674; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:54:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133788FC15; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBDEB4.dip.t-dialin.net [93.203.222.180]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q5FFsDN8017636; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:54:14 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5FFs2nc066852; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:54:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5FFrupt045155; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:54:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201206151554.q5FFrupt045155@fire.js.berklix.net> From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:50:00 +0200." Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:53:56 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, johans@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Mk macros & print/texinfo/distinfo variant SHA256 SIZE X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:54:15 -0000 > current Mk/bsd.port.mk has > # DISABLE_SIZE - Do not check the size of a distfile even if the SIZE field > # has been specified in distinfo. This is useful > # when using an alternate FETCH_CMD. PS: It's a port wide variable, not for individual files. Used here: ./graphics/py-gd/Makefile:DISABLE_SIZE= yes ./java/eclipse-clay-core/Makefile:DISABLE_SIZE?= yes ./math/djbfft/Makefile:DISABLE_SIZE= yes ./sysutils/fusefs-kmod/Makefile:DISABLE_SIZE= yes ./sysutils/ucspi-ipc/Makefile:DISABLE_SIZE= yes ./x11-fonts/urwfonts-ttf/Makefile:DISABLE_SIZE= yes ./x11-wm/piewm/Makefile:DISABLE_SIZE= yes Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 17:08:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4D61065675 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:08:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gh0-f182.google.com (mail-gh0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C52C8FC14 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:08:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghbz22 with SMTP id z22so2916223ghb.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:08:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:organization:x-mailer:face :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=A/bZdzaFNTgkATEAZMICgJq4MR+ScWINAYdfjJXyH0c=; b=VEvKrK/rZFv1vHpd7gF/Tlm0Oe4QLKvHBNMZv+fe79B/HuHGYxmLhLWwxZM/iMCyyM WPqTJDmm6MhGMWfzwR8s/MICmhc24ltdHbvIR9Imx9ntzDr5Vl6W9lD6KbnoIv7mXEMX zw7gyzZptxheApWBSSO7CY9BM0E+jAY7STKtY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:organization:x-mailer:face :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=A/bZdzaFNTgkATEAZMICgJq4MR+ScWINAYdfjJXyH0c=; b=mtWE6PZwbqKSDmnkMvOeZVNP8vYV7MP/v9r6cR8tazPCY/l/2gG8ru/eLcOm+uzDeS qnmwf1B9MbVeKmV3X6+x/ECj8sIOLs5hLdDJlj6WjO86VxLGKfB32oGshVdLZSyckEpz ektfHGSv3NF/cHKx3b65UhFF2AnAdBmU/FSXMoPcL4nrMsrhuy2tdR9c9mGpG+FquWIw oCuU0k5THP4sl7g3sZDeaOXaaIXRD3lQOzdQr6OHnOOew5smGlC8TCncD8t+YsnlWf3J 16cJ/9U942pw1MSt+7GZBtFtqEAQ4JSqgn2GIz5HCoYfbJY44QB4CYzp89FTuanU7UjE xHlw== Received: by 10.236.115.193 with SMTP id e41mr9172593yhh.4.1339780122553; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:08:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u6sm16815395anl.1.2012.06.15.10.08.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:08:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3WDSpH4mWwz2CG46 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:08:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:08:39 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlz6W8LlqVAr2+R81Hsy1mItRxCxXMIvaU2Y5JWcYadd48C0ykJRqb2JaO1rEXEOIveYJrm Subject: Skype 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:08:43 -0000 Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of getting it ported to FreeBSD? The latest version in ports is only 2.x. -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 17:53:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11F5106566C; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:53:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from animelovin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D5E8FC0A; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl8 with SMTP id l8so3114657yen.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:53:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent:mime-version :to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CoMwSVHx7K8BUtYX7H1uUtOMmQhcl2xWXKsP2KulmsU=; b=tmJJoLwUhnVc6WC0XctYXXwdXXMpLG1RKeixpJ4eZjOhRAyuCyDLShu5BT0ucZZ6y2 bn6Z7D7X6HWDHfZd1WeJYW9OwXI33WZjffmYUTrAwqUV4WlgXvX2qcJpzzTdm3Cr+X+O Uo1nLgUU22Y4uzF/g+J4zoLEa1if/jVckfWFX2lCq9JPeTWXH6yu9UMBHiV+Zuw0y63V t+my+Q3swqjmkk5w/iP1wHXkgbcRxuCznyp8de/2KVcfcqWr142v6UBKjdoVGTBzUcT3 YW/Oy+lGc/aLPGMVt+4O1i77REVn5PAPqYfbrgK8c0/VdgZ/vqOX9R7FQv0aJ9TFypc4 VpvA== Received: by 10.100.244.16 with SMTP id r16mr2828272anh.68.1339782805768; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:53:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (modemcable107.221-22-96.mc.videotron.ca. [96.22.221.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r45sm33937730yhg.18.2012.06.15.10.53.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:53:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FDB7698.2010207@gthcfoundation.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:53:28 -0400 From: Etienne Robillard Organization: gthcfoundation.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Hans Petter Selasky , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: FreeBSD not so free anymore ? Long live FreeBSD... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: erob@gthcfoundation.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:53:26 -0000 On 06/15/2012 01:08 PM, Jerry wrote: > Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of > getting it ported to FreeBSD? The latest version in ports is only > 2.x. Why not? Thinking FreeBSD could become immune to remote exploits is absurd. So without much efforts I can guess ports like Skype will become more widespread now that FreeBSD has gived up on network security, preferring to announce critical security vulnerabilities once the exploit has been confirmed without any warnings. A good reason to stop using this bloated OS if you ask me and use something more respectful to their users base relaying on STABLE for stability reasons... Cheers, E -- Etienne Robillard Occupation: Software Developer Company: Green Tea Hackers Club Email: erob@gthcfoundation.org Website: gthcfoundation.org Skype ID: incidah From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 17:57:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC651065676 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:57:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E31E38FC1D for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:57:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BABA621C21 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:57:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E193E621C0F for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:57:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FDB7787.6040303@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:57:27 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> <4FDB7698.2010207@gthcfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <4FDB7698.2010207@gthcfoundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD not so free anymore ? Long live FreeBSD... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:57:30 -0000 On 6/15/12 1:53 PM, Etienne Robillard wrote: > A good reason to stop using this bloated OS if you ask me and use > something more respectful to their users base relaying on STABLE for > stability reasons... PLEASE use linux.. they need you and love you. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 18:13:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E47106566C; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2BB8FC08; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so3228420bkv.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:13:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=97fuNNVe/JHpmPNd+MWEmBOM1qrnGHYS938AsyJU+6o=; b=tbojus93qMxvPlX9G16REQMO4GsbzvJQlxTsQ7lUsz0bE0ohSA9hzbdCg+jWEyO0jk NEkDF2vIsAW/NDoCEXG/MPY2oLCyRbgcwmq4U94swkLzpx4u44CMZfeAk8f4kxAqtxbe /f/IvqUj+gR4dBS0zTGKexnKGNHY1EMXQ5S8IT23b9W1gMT7/i6InLjMx5t/Y1hQ1pXI p+wkuWOorj8xU2WVMyRecG8CyC/6D2bhbLOTbeOFjvGrwORoVcGJfUEDd8tqhRbuyPZu En6cnj1Hac7SvPQUNuTZejGZPpUVfn5GnoDnDGgetxW16TAhTEvQL3MoqH5wdx7v7MCn E3sA== Received: by 10.204.145.89 with SMTP id c25mr3349596bkv.5.1339784008517; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:13:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.171.138 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:12:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FDB7698.2010207@gthcfoundation.org> References: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> <4FDB7698.2010207@gthcfoundation.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:12:58 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: uPvkRyUuEwk2NK7geo9mkuALuAw Message-ID: To: erob@gthcfoundation.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Hans Petter Selasky Subject: Re: FreeBSD not so free anymore ? Long live FreeBSD... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:13:30 -0000 On 15 June 2012 18:53, Etienne Robillard wrote: > On 06/15/2012 01:08 PM, Jerry wrote: >> >> Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of >> getting it ported to FreeBSD? The latest version in ports is only >> 2.x. > > > > Why not? Thinking FreeBSD could become immune to remote exploits is absur= d. > > So without much efforts =A0I can guess ports like Skype will become more > widespread now that FreeBSD has gived up on network security, preferring = to > announce critical security vulnerabilities once the exploit has been > confirmed without any warnings. > > A good reason to stop using this bloated OS if you ask me and use > something more respectful to their users base relaying on STABLE for > stability reasons... > New versions of Skype require ALSA. This is at their insistence. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 21:08:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97933106573A for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:08:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8DA8FC12 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:08:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so2449704vbm.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:08:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=QpAFE9ebKBkDku7IVRUzHTxbcn9HWmpo5oxPopmCt2k=; b=oCdAZEC9QruDyKiSqB4XakT+XuexLnMOJ3Jw//MuXnnJw2uKklM9+jah3vlmwN9Q0G OfXDwgF5vdAVyDZSDTwbdl0xMo2GAZQH/DPPNRQzLzvBwlrS1hMTj7Qj/4rPaR5rJUKw AHxrc+tkgbFNgfGA0mAcVm7SOr1E6uhDN5jAdrUESos8snKg8VkRu2J0diJbbIquc6dG wcdoPXfzQEneTw+m2HuSD7PiwR5487sWtLzqJBDWTlfB9HLKrRS0apuW09DAlxc36hn8 6MrikAIzMjKFu4lEmvFsws5S5HuDn72sKqQAWhg9mWVqQl5KaCrH1fX53Sto+QYoGizV iqXw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.220.203 with SMTP id hz11mr3749345vcb.41.1339794482580; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:08:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.113.97 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:08:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> References: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:08:02 -0400 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Skype 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:08:04 -0000 On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Jerry wrote: > Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of > getting it ported to FreeBSD? The latest version in ports is only > 2.x. I don't have time to do it right at the moment, but since this is pre-compiled binary software, updating the port yourself and sending the patches in with a PR would not be a complex task. I'm confident that you could do it. Start here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/quick-porting.html The URL for downloading the bugger is here: http://download.skype.com/linux/skype_static-4.0.0.7.tar.bz2 Good luck, and thanks in advance! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 21:11:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD27F1065670 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:11:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.neese@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F2D8FC14 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so5785535obc.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:11:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vJQdSE7puz8cK7aGUp4noXjcSPVCJ3nFBQvUVyA/0lw=; b=Qpug/bRHzgoCuF1Y2g88qL+rnuHAUFbRqUM8LuKwXvkGvVLSn7LN31VO+8sVBoXb6G PgNpVOU+kjl9/6Eau2X7Zx3TcLCS2+hYYwUpsyHrhaTNRn3yzvul/FsH9VJv5akscmw/ /FGxsZEJlUu7b1tN18bvi30Xd4oGbppkP+yhH0fd4nKT+W0Mlw8npAsERTjvzSGFn7/a eubyz+1ck1rkmx6zNvueERxOF8GLrVEztzMNfE1M0RmvcRje5f+QCFitbJPAZlgLrgo9 UZXYZHX7512VXHVr8U5rzOX5d1wF/gcB8CJRgsG1W4DJNRjoET051SvIxyZOcMpS91Ev VZng== Received: by 10.182.14.100 with SMTP id o4mr7496971obc.23.1339794665010; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:11:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([70.127.108.139]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o4sm6110098oef.11.2012.06.15.14.11.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:11:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FDBA4E7.40209@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:11:03 -0400 From: Rich Neese User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Simmons References: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Skype 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:11:05 -0000 On 6/15/2012 5:08 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Jerry wrote: >> Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of >> getting it ported to FreeBSD? The latest version in ports is only >> 2.x. > I don't have time to do it right at the moment, but since this is > pre-compiled binary software, updating the port yourself and sending > the patches in with a PR would not be a complex task. I'm confident > that you could do it. Start here: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/quick-porting.html > > The URL for downloading the bugger is here: > http://download.skype.com/linux/skype_static-4.0.0.7.tar.bz2 > > Good luck, and thanks in advance! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I just wish skype would get off their buts and make a bsd version. time to break code and make a opensource version From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 21:12:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121561065670 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:12:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gh0-f182.google.com (mail-gh0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18E48FC08 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghbz22 with SMTP id z22so3145384ghb.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:12:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+oLlrhVNr4YWDs2y+cbE4yR6K0L5brUuKH0YOVZT9II=; b=LwZbsajckyrvMDd+gEzJ7RLDn8D7sNvISvUqZP59Ea4BYUeyr9DdrvSRDNOdv/x4lb aebAE5biF9N/vW8B2c4m8LghZSL8epTcvLil59A+sqolQyGQ5wYuQIriuKO3dH9wO4X1 JjaYdT9I1wgkfheXnhJD8fVuEWWbarCWLy3rg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=+oLlrhVNr4YWDs2y+cbE4yR6K0L5brUuKH0YOVZT9II=; b=ndoRPCi69PITqBuEh1ahYa3k/5DV2fxvfw/mXVpusEDI7D0tBQ4ySYMnkcRWpCkHbV g8BMel48cm28I2KLX50+uxT1cvuUyQkiIP+r8LN7WIl3C9S5OmltKcnmPVjCJUm1wlwa ePfXNeBp6PyVPFR3XgCyGDSFCWZA8a85aG24yf+IGH5pKwnYrRXj7kEeg+8f9/yD6G2h jR6weIXOXl8DX63UwS1t6E7oVESMIRB6cBOaIjRZAubbJjOrPFy7Ak6r38X8e8jej91B NE8YyKXoOYPjYQyhSpp8De4c/MQ9HOU03nuA9Ky5IdNrN1PAcv+GqnJ9Qrjz6Zc0q5Yh hYTw== Received: by 10.236.168.65 with SMTP id j41mr9721962yhl.82.1339794747219; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:12:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q32sm17856770anh.21.2012.06.15.14.12.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:12:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3WDZCX40nKz2CG46 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:12:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:12:24 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120615171224.3667db09@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> <4FDB7698.2010207@gthcfoundation.org> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnllvC04HJzn0BUfWctvVj4PPEyx7HnFFrt8Ew8N5VRsA7cQa4YPBJKaLERlFBOHwS7B1se Subject: Re: FreeBSD not so free anymore ? Long live FreeBSD... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:12:28 -0000 On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:12:58 +0100 Chris Rees articulated: >On 15 June 2012 18:53, Etienne Robillard wrote: >> On 06/15/2012 01:08 PM, Jerry wrote: >>> >>> Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of >>> getting it ported to FreeBSD? The latest version in ports is only >>> 2.x. >> >> Why not? Thinking FreeBSD could become immune to remote exploits is >> absurd. >> >> So without much efforts  I can guess ports like Skype will become >> more widespread now that FreeBSD has gived up on network security, >> preferring to announce critical security vulnerabilities once the >> exploit has been confirmed without any warnings. >> >> A good reason to stop using this bloated OS if you ask me and use >> something more respectful to their users base relaying on STABLE for >> stability reasons... > >New versions of Skype require ALSA. This is at their insistence. So, are you implying that ALSA (Advanced Linux Sound Architecture) is never going to happen on a FreeBSD system? By the way, thanks to "Etienne Robillard " for completely changing the thread subject. -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 21:16:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F20D106566B for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0B58FC1C for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfy7 with SMTP id fy7so2361767vcb.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:16:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=sWa7bfnZ1jEfGR03+PK7dl7LQOdXFRII1vGUY1yBY7Q=; b=aicsOQlAQVvDNYvDjQEJoZ4e+os20LYKp1VFe9kQ80dtQOlyLrSx74arJ2zvpbup/L HxKnjlDL0kzY8ux+QFVfEo95OElURmVfuDdBwtPnwyM4JFvp5UEWWORL7VWPcn/XBrEW mjxSaP9PYR3m2wTYsElRMEfTIQL/6K6BPa7XPlPr5c1nHB6m6omx7tBcyR/6/w3eFXAH jBmfnmxapmPViR6X3gPLPRr+Gt0CaM7JPGGitAD48ZQfF0Xz0k5vpU4ro5NpYXqdIo1L RHAfhY6EbRlV0j+6jKnXz4KkBPyT0D+ASxtWsfEZsJHnMAkTK+Ntdlaa/40kb8EKfL5g 0ToQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.22.38 with SMTP id a6mr3089409vdf.37.1339795003046; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.113.97 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:16:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> References: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:16:43 -0400 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Skype 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:16:44 -0000 On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Jerry wrote: > Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of > getting it ported to FreeBSD? The latest version in ports is only > 2.x. One last thing. These are the files that you are going to want to patch: ports/net-im/skype/ If you've never used cvs before, it is trivially easy. Follow A.4.3 Examples in the handbook exactly, but replace "ls" with "ports/net-im/skype/Makefile" etc: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/anoncvs.html You will also want to read 4.3. Attaching patches or files: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/problem-reports/article.html From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 21:25:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB751065676 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D73C8FC1C for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so2458194vbm.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:25:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Dza6N1u1yUc0TeI6N2K+CV2jiaGgfY/Pi/kB33/46nk=; b=aUMnzc66Zc1pHqNnZgSItCREK418P96Gjmp3ye/77+tbrhPqW45l9UGtg7MzKMxYnN EHFEkeHCKNTj2Lw7Q2D3q78gLy95mzJoSWd0IS6WArFQWpJJYBRt/r2Z7k+qDnKx7Gdl sSatYei9OH4QlpaS21L03ceLGDhR0TdxE8HLKFjoR+ki3aaKqxYEcEqnaHdeFlL4zOP6 0298PN0A78YrHSiXYYfoZjOlCqR2vZAL1sGVh3cErpfI4QPkeScQipPfMjUzJqCjTmvq drUtKZdkfgSKSjBMLHQMJ+8DCLI4yqW89/VH2ZQke9ZIduLul/ZdKClNgQtvKQzIi4gO WFzA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.88.176 with SMTP id bh16mr2997136vdb.132.1339795508235; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:25:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.113.97 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:25:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FDBA4E7.40209@gmail.com> References: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> <4FDBA4E7.40209@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:25:08 -0400 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Skype 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:25:13 -0000 On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Rich Neese wrote: > I just wish skype would get off their buts and make a bsd version. time > to break code and make a opensource version That's not the answer. Really, everyone needs to move away from Skype altogether. Use Blink. It is a superior client and it uses SIP rather than Skype's network. Making a FreeBSD port of it has been on my list of things to do for quite a while, I just haven't had the time. If you want to check it out you can find it here: http://devel.ag-projects.com/repositories/blink-qt/ It is written in Python, and it is GPL. There is a MacOS binary and a Windows binary download of it on their website. http://icanblink.com/index.phtml From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 21:38:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E76B106564A for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:38:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6768FC0A for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 15 Jun 2012 17:38:14 -0400 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BUS56972; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:38:13 -0400 Received: from 209-6-86-84.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.86.84]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 15 Jun 2012 17:38:13 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20443.43842.531258.172276@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:38:10 -0400 To: Rich Neese In-Reply-To: <4FDBA4E7.40209@gmail.com> References: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> <4FDBA4E7.40209@gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Robert Simmons Subject: Re: Skype 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:38:20 -0000 Rich Neese writes: > >> Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of > >> getting it ported to FreeBSD? The latest version in ports is only > >> 2.x. > I just wish skype would get off their buts and make a bsd > version. time to break code and make a opensource version That would be a lot of work, and subject to Skype altering with the protocol and various internal bits. Last time this came around on the gee-tar, I believe the root problem was higher versions don't work with the Linux emulation code. Improving that would also be a lot of work (probably involving different skills) ... but would benefit all programs that run under emulation. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 22:06:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229251065670 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:06:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from animelovin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C65FD8FC16 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:06:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so2350251qcs.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:06:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=taiRGgDkYNiDOzaOSKJCuPO0qHmUY8TErpZlu8W6xOk=; b=XEqzbWuy6FpAyAbLCrXrW8h0wq1BxssCIHZFF3r2f6VpEr2viYA8t9Nhyv6iGrSVuK umBKkuU3O5BMQ7Y1GK+XH8JniebGwYz+f6NzyErSjYRx1Jrt4WiUvlXM/dHfRNW9ZY/4 MlHkO5SE+tX7bEDNrrfysns3L7+j+UHjfiSb8yvu/RUT717cC6/QnuyyWFlsCPbQniG1 Gz8TUQl5CAs9CdMUwxZk8fUyijmb8vYuR0jLGJxmF880ZNHOW9fMx6ZOLVoagUpCWusg LC2LyOhe/G1vAWn1wy6FhnyF/+JcFdY3mSz0bK1HEaTpU6Tx0UsTWQGvjXVWux2ZM8nZ e0OQ== Received: by 10.224.181.203 with SMTP id bz11mr13987461qab.55.1339798004025; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:06:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (modemcable107.221-22-96.mc.videotron.ca. [96.22.221.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fx5sm8873958qab.14.2012.06.15.15.06.42 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:06:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FDBB1F1.7080601@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:06:41 -0400 From: animelovin@gmail.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Simmons , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> <4FDBA4E7.40209@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Skype 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: animelovin@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:06:45 -0000 On 06/15/2012 05:25 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Rich Neese wrote: >> I just wish skype would get off their buts and make a bsd version. time >> to break code and make a opensource version > > That's not the answer. Really, everyone needs to move away from Skype > altogether. Use Blink. It is a superior client and it uses SIP > rather than Skype's network. Making a FreeBSD port of it has been on > my list of things to do for quite a while, I just haven't had the > time. > > If you want to check it out you can find it here: > http://devel.ag-projects.com/repositories/blink-qt/ > > It is written in Python, and it is GPL. There is a MacOS binary and a > Windows binary download of it on their website. > http://icanblink.com/index.phtml __________ Thanks for the intelligent answer, I could have not said anything better. Will look into SIP/Blink for a more secure alternative than skype... :-) Regards, Etienne From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 22:35:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32EB01065677 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:35:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDFF8FC21 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:35:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so2487894vbm.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:35:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hnbYOTO/cfePANOxj+FVHTRobm6Tb/0VceWno+h4jU0=; b=NXtoLHbi0ZEBbKZVGqWSISGWbY4mR8rwzXFikzSX6Ajbf6gEIceH1tZpDULttNQQFx oZwZwVO2vQ53k4cLS5tn4tXa74Dayxk8h0Y/uHnXqgIJOTGTY/MFoSQscPs71dVR/0JY j8yKrMF+PoUEoKGGLPJ3X4KVfk+/6n0L5YKvM6nT2G4cygNya/8W69DmnX0FIgEP4iIZ /egzXpaHOKoBseOBfl0GzTuZ5+D8gW3pNoVpydrVpz+u3//0dO3j+BGXZ4tfVKiwy4jx u5jgjAPpNwq5R0lx83igMPxrChraqBGRbwBS6CL64f1jC2hyt4LPlvWnbDvkG39b+W7f WbVA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.88.176 with SMTP id bh16mr3053550vdb.132.1339799714012; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.113.97 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:35:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FDBB1F1.7080601@gmail.com> References: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> <4FDBA4E7.40209@gmail.com> <4FDBB1F1.7080601@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:35:13 -0400 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Skype 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:35:15 -0000 On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 6:06 PM, wrote: > On 06/15/2012 05:25 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Rich Neese =A0wrote: >>> >>> I just wish skype would get off their buts and make a bsd version. time >>> to break code and make a opensource version >> >> >> That's not the answer. =A0Really, everyone needs to move away from Skype >> altogether. =A0Use Blink. =A0It is a superior client and it uses SIP >> rather than Skype's network. =A0Making a FreeBSD port of it has been on >> my list of things to do for quite a while, I just haven't had the >> time. >> >> If you want to check it out you can find it here: >> http://devel.ag-projects.com/repositories/blink-qt/ >> >> It is written in Python, and it is GPL. =A0There is a MacOS binary and a >> Windows binary download of it on their website. >> http://icanblink.com/index.phtml > > __________ > > Thanks for the intelligent answer, I could have not said anything better. > > Will look into SIP/Blink for a more secure alternative than skype... :-) Thanks! One more thing to note, since using SIP/Blink introduces the old problem of being the only person on Earth with a fax machine. Getting your linuxy friends to convert to FreeBSD may be impossible, but getting them to add Blink's repositories to their apt config is trivial since Blink runs their own Ubuntu PPA: http://www.ag-projects.com/projects-products-96/683-software-repositories From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 00:42:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2DF106566C for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 00:42:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7A98FC15 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 00:42:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so6057384obc.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:42:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=SbxaH2sX0Diw8pI+2c7UW0mnwW4Ld0jp41J9Gu3iRhc=; b=YOOPsAPwoFS5Wro0P7sCgB78YjHVGG0c8LgvBAbO6QfARe5gq/pyW2PT8T+XXjzCl0 Hn+u33dEwN70jLh0H/GTjat8aEQNLVkk6zlfC2lxi/ZYrJTEaaDa4fQ7eumHQMQ9TGPw 2GPhsL1u1Mp1U85LXNkVyWx5hbxiELNAnythCt6cnzre2bSt1k9dMOjz8EsYREtFZoiq M3+vSHymfsJeADaN/hx0MJKenssFq0sjC3BUPAmQkT1gStZYNkJlvi5YaAX2py++CGyY A5SFq3keLw63by3CyyEVOmHz8ReFAK2SLQuALY+OtY95Pa4SUMoIApP3C0d6GNFhCh2h Mljg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.77.170 with SMTP id t10mr7888661obw.70.1339807337643; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.48.130 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:42:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> <4FDBA4E7.40209@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:42:17 -0500 Message-ID: From: Franci Nabalanci To: Robert Simmons Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Skype 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 00:42:18 -0000 No, the aswer is Skype still. Why? Because Skype use user of Windows 3.1 to Windows 7, MAC, Linux... How many people use FreeBSD? Does FreeBSD user comunicate just with the other FreeBSD user? On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Rich Neese wrote: > > I just wish skype would get off their buts and make a bsd version. time > > to break code and make a opensource version > > That's not the answer. Really, everyone needs to move away from Skype > altogether. Use Blink. It is a superior client and it uses SIP > rather than Skype's network. Making a FreeBSD port of it has been on > my list of things to do for quite a while, I just haven't had the > time. > > If you want to check it out you can find it here: > http://devel.ag-projects.com/repositories/blink-qt/ > > It is written in Python, and it is GPL. There is a MacOS binary and a > Windows binary download of it on their website. > http://icanblink.com/index.phtml > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 01:59:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F73E1065675 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:59:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from yoshi.bluerosetech.com (yoshi.bluerosetech.com [174.136.100.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633F88FC12 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:59:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vivi.cat.pdx.edu (vivi.cat.pdx.edu [131.252.214.6]) by yoshi.bluerosetech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9BD84E600B; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:59:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:8643:970:211:43ff:fe70:5826] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:8643:970:211:43ff:fe70:5826]) by vivi.cat.pdx.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B79024C8B; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:59:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FDBE878.5010008@bluerosetech.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:59:20 -0700 From: Darren Pilgrim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120421 Thunderbird/10.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Simmons References: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> <4FDBA4E7.40209@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Skype 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:59:10 -0000 On 2012-06-15 14:25, Robert Simmons wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Rich Neese wrote: >> I just wish skype would get off their buts and make a bsd version. time >> to break code and make a opensource version > > That's not the answer. Really, everyone needs to move away from Skype > altogether. Use Blink. It is a superior client and it uses SIP > rather than Skype's network. Making a FreeBSD port of it has been on > my list of things to do for quite a while, I just haven't had the > time. Skype supports video calls. According to AG Projects' website, Blink is a VoIP app with IM features added, no video. Is this not the case? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 02:30:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6490D106566B for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 02:30:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@brightstar.bomgardner.net) Received: from brightstar.bomgardner.net (brightstar.bomgardner.net [63.229.207.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3895A8FC0A for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 02:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from brightstar.bomgardner.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brightstar.bomgardner.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B3D8CB for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:31:02 -0500 (CDT) From: "Gene" To: FreeBsd-ports Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:31:02 -0500 Message-Id: <20120616022223.M1362@brightstar.bomgardner.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20120614234727.M12036@brightstar.bomgardner.net> X-Mailer: OpenWebMail 2.53 X-OriginatingIP: 192.168.0.2 (fbsd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Subject: Re: mail/mailman install problem python 2.6 import urandom X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 02:30:31 -0000 The problem is with 2.6. 2.7 performs the below just fine. 2.6 does not, The mailman port seems to insist on 2.6 no matter what I do. brightstar# uname -srm FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 amd64 brightstar# python2.6 --version Python 2.6.7 brightstar# python2.6 -c 'from os import urandom as _urandom; print str (_urandom)' Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in ImportError: cannot import name urandom dir(os) list no "urandom" Is there supposed to be a urandom in 2.6? Gene On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:35:59 +0200, Daniel Nebdal wrote > That's slightly bizarre - urandom should be in the os module. Just > to verify: > > mr16613: > uname -srm > FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE amd64 > mr16613: > python2.7 --version > Python 2.7.3 > mr16613: > python2.7 -c 'from os import urandom as _urandom ; print > str(_urandom)' > > > Out of curiosity, could you try something in python? > Start python2.7 , and enter > import os > dir(os) > > That ought to display a long list of things in the os module, > including urandom. > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Gene > wrote: > > Hi All: > > > >  Running 8.1 AMD64. I had python 2.6.8 installed. After upgrading several > >  ports, which installed python 2.7.3_2, scripts requiring 2.6 fail due to an > >  inability to import urandom from os. > > > >  Now I'm not a python person by any means, but I was wondering where its > >  trying to find urandom. Could it be looking for 'dev/urandom'? Or perhaps > >  urandom from ports/math/mpc? > > > >  In a few scripts I've changed 2.6 to 2.7 and they seem to work. Did > >  installing 2.7 alongside 2.6 break something? > > > >  Specifically, right now I'm trying to install mail/mailman port which looks > >  for python 2.6. It terminates with the following: > > > >  ================================================ > >  Compiling /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/versions.py ... > >  Traceback (most recent call last): > >  File "bin/update", line 50, in > >    from Mailman import Utils > >  File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Utils.py", line 32, in > >    import cgi > >  File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/cgi.py", line 49, in > >    import mimetools > >  File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/mimetools.py", line 6, in > >    import tempfile > >  File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/tempfile.py", line 34, in > >    from random import Random as _Random > >  File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/random.py", line 47, in > >    from os import urandom as _urandom > >  ImportError: cannot import name urandom > >  ================================================= > > > >  I've googled and searched archives and all I can find is ubuntu problems > >  related to a virtual machine. > > > >  Does anyone know what's going on? > > > >  Thanks, > >  Gene > > > > -- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 03:33:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB275106566C for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 03:33:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7508FC0A for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 03:33:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by laai10 with SMTP id i10so3050995laa.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:33:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=EfKFRX8yykoomWJ4yEfgaBmNMd+WI16MkD3taMgmIHM=; b=VNpjuFwGf/drDm5Ay1TUxkrRoe1b47JGPR4Z88yNHOZZDDXDz/Xvo2AzHbhVz2XPAG lGw92OBE8eTdiaB7ZdwXWVBvQHeXqXHZQTf1CpBCk17M0BfYs2Z8lsHW5574ZVLWdeiT Kucg+olpZD2k+Lx0AjOmo+Rxj9xO5zJA1sLZyp6ZJjrJ5yqPV+2GfjtOhMj7+Og7yjTr BkmCFsS+1F/PJGARIr4Pr1NX9rKMG+S54A41D4Qsn5kvuj2CfsRbqd8nFS6w2CIO9ONl B2OdoHfDI0cdZZqBuhfKT0idlLgGI1kpWdJuCGkQpuXWcbeWWn2KGKJCkE4MVp8nqd1v 6wTg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.108.144 with SMTP id hk16mr7484231lab.2.1339817593802; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:33:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.107.170 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:33:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> <4FDBA4E7.40209@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:33:13 -0400 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Skype 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 03:33:15 -0000 On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Franci Nabalanci wrote: > No, the aswer is Skype still. Why? Because Skype use user of Windows 3.1 to > Windows 7, MAC, Linux... > How many people use FreeBSD? Does FreeBSD user comunicate just with the > other FreeBSD user? Please reread my post to the list. I was describing an open source SIP client written in Python. It is not restricted to FreeBSD, it can run anywhere you like. You should modify what you said to How many other people have telephone numbers? And how many people use SIP? Otherwise what you asked doesn't make any sense. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 03:36:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B27106564A for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 03:36:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E018FC0A for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 03:36:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbon10 with SMTP id n10so4033361lbo.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:36:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VrDr00BaxiU5RbCVSJqPHTn7xWllvJD6Wo5HUQqts2Q=; b=RM3OVYeZ4x41+cT+MivVq4G2fNYgfr/4N80ZPEdqljZikovR2Ir8fRZrMLLyVBNEHw i8jHkp+jWm+vxt/m+MZJhCKyRexwjUeDC2Xp1uPaik7DUUandB0Z4XY4lUsTr40IYmyW Y1H+tcw4jH566GbcJIaEMn5Rn13qhamTyfMgg4Wk0nvUqFSNgAj7az5LEWpwWkR4iKt4 hZ07xRHG3sE7omA+PBRlYrq+CO2rxaPk3SEi4wHKzdv4zrsGr/b4zIKJzjJaoZwiKWnJ stnbKfwudKhQtwOVd9fCwH98EuuJ5obl1JZENny/DZdCHThAsGxV9WkW8EW6X8Shr3P4 Pn5Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.84.65 with SMTP id w1mr3443811lby.40.1339817817166; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:36:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.107.170 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:36:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FDBE878.5010008@bluerosetech.com> References: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> <4FDBA4E7.40209@gmail.com> <4FDBE878.5010008@bluerosetech.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:36:56 -0400 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Skype 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 03:36:59 -0000 On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > On 2012-06-15 14:25, Robert Simmons wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Rich Neese =A0wrote: >>> >>> I just wish skype would get off their buts and make a bsd version. time >>> to break code and make a opensource version >> >> >> That's not the answer. =A0Really, everyone needs to move away from Skype >> altogether. =A0Use Blink. =A0It is a superior client and it uses SIP >> rather than Skype's network. =A0Making a FreeBSD port of it has been on >> my list of things to do for quite a while, I just haven't had the >> time. > > > Skype supports video calls. =A0According to AG Projects' website, Blink i= s a > VoIP app with IM features added, no video. =A0Is this not the case? I dislike video, so I have never even looked for that feature, but now that I'm looking, no it doesn't support video. I was curious, so I googled alternatives to Blink and I ran across Linphone. Has anyone used this? It exists in the FreeBSD ports collection, but is a few versions behind the current stable version from the project's website. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 06:02:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88654106564A for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:02:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: from z.umatar.com (z.umatar.com [66.135.39.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549328FC0C for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:02:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from z.umatar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5G62ieZ059581; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:02:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) Received: (from uzimac@localhost) by z.umatar.com (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q5G62hnR059580; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:02:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com) X-Authentication-Warning: z.umatar.com: uzimac set sender to uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com using -f From: "Waitman Gobble" To: Robert Simmons Message-Id: <1339826563.59482@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Originating-IP: 187.146.184.212 X-Mailer: Usermin 1.500 In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:02:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bound1339826563" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Skype 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:02:50 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1339826563 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Robert Simmons wrote .. > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Darren Pilgrim > wrote: > > On 2012-06-15 14:25, Robert Simmons wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Rich Neese =A0wrote: > >>> > >>> I just wish skype would get off their buts and make a bsd version. time > >>> to break code and make a opensource version > >> > >> > >> That's not the answer. =A0Really, everyone needs to move away from Skype > >> altogether. =A0Use Blink. =A0It is a superior client and it uses SIP > >> rather than Skype's network. =A0Making a FreeBSD port of it has been on > >> my list of things to do for quite a while, I just haven't had the > >> time. > > > > > > Skype supports video calls. =A0According to AG Projects' website, Blink is a > > VoIP app with IM features added, no video. =A0Is this not the case? > > I dislike video, so I have never even looked for that feature, but now > that I'm looking, no it doesn't support video. I was curious, so I > googled alternatives to Blink and I ran across Linphone. Has anyone > used this? It exists in the FreeBSD ports collection, but is a few > versions behind the current stable version from the project's website. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" dude like since MS bought it they haven't even released any non-win32 version. i agree, a different alternative to skype is better, and get your contacts to join up with that. -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA --bound1339826563-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 06:11:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972A9106564A for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183188FC15 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbon10 with SMTP id n10so4078952lbo.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:11:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=H1ETyrJFI87FT/WYT+FD7tltqRH937g6q9K1AqHNyHU=; b=mU7KdUQkOkDaSKPqr/Fv6SfvQIY1v1oaYcPeyr3fuPedvNa1//du4IpWTm6RmCfjZH E/JgVGrtCTfWN3dSBQGHc/2+44RvS6yA05xnamh5LDr/TBAMXSIBRoJy63odCqtzU4wI 0lBKFL7unbwkk2R3DgoORHN5V4/eJ2E7jdeHD0YqQ61Dw87DamFNtPhwa5bvgOTDCBjY 7Dp3951MPwZ5HPbLdEmzZNxCI8PPd9jNMdlrK7/3Gv/2U9+SD/9rm/tJ94p9kXRZTkb0 oMrnG+ECddKmdZLg9MLKla+c1dtDrLKN33qGQldzIvsPZmIqVKRTsOcJL5woPlo2Mt4t Wnow== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.30.41 with SMTP id p9mr3684311lbh.26.1339827074771; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.107.170 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:11:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1339826563.59482@da3m0n8t3r.com> References: <1339826563.59482@da3m0n8t3r.com> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 02:11:14 -0400 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Skype 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:11:16 -0000 On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > dude like since MS bought it they haven't even released any non-win32 version. i agree, a different alternative to skype is better, and get your contacts to join up with that. Huh? "New in this version 4.0": http://www.skype.com/intl/en-us/get-skype/on-your-computer/linux/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 06:12:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F98B106564A for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:12:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005078FC12 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:12:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so2493748qcs.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:12:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lbLfwTfcNUgX8mh/jaJYwSUZVGe+L7eK0yr07deA8a0=; b=hGTRGSvVqWc7qMpIklLru56kK/L1JRA39nYbhlMd3dk1N+CSCxvFV9w838q/0Hira9 HR/YJ6EUA/6ZzdJuJ/lLM25g2TYR9rUp+Si2o0BtF9mTw/UtA9qOQoOCp9JWnVjZTEJp gjX3Rj8W2JK3hCIkd87mdDk5jiw2q7FocZsANJELg0a76qWVYzWhhNL60rFgf9Q44rrC 0H4fbiTH5aCCXdaK1p5OXYn6nYN1H13ffVEu7sRSL7+ntDSDu+4ysLIN+xWR4j/MPKQp ZWIytnLv8mfypUJsoYndpuXwuVawtMZBMooaFSw23IbgaB64j5RicFfObQyidG79c6lF wj3Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.185.130 with SMTP id co2mr15696870qab.25.1339827133441; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:12:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.187.5 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:12:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> <4FDBA4E7.40209@gmail.com> <4FDBE878.5010008@bluerosetech.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:12:13 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: Robert Simmons Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Skype 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:12:14 -0000 On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Robert Simmons wrote= : > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Darren Pilgrim > wrote: >> On 2012-06-15 14:25, Robert Simmons wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Rich Neese =C2=A0wr= ote: >>>> >>>> I just wish skype would get off their buts and make a bsd version. tim= e >>>> to break code and make a opensource version >>> >>> >>> That's not the answer. =C2=A0Really, everyone needs to move away from S= kype >>> altogether. =C2=A0Use Blink. =C2=A0It is a superior client and it uses = SIP >>> rather than Skype's network. =C2=A0Making a FreeBSD port of it has been= on >>> my list of things to do for quite a while, I just haven't had the >>> time. >> >> >> Skype supports video calls. =C2=A0According to AG Projects' website, Bli= nk is a >> VoIP app with IM features added, no video. =C2=A0Is this not the case? > > I dislike video, so I have never even looked for that feature, but now > that I'm looking, no it doesn't support video. =C2=A0I was curious, so I > googled alternatives to Blink and I ran across Linphone. =C2=A0Has anyone > used this? =C2=A0It exists in the FreeBSD ports collection, but is a few > versions behind the current stable version from the project's website. You might look at ekiga. It is in ports and a standard part of Gnome. It does sip and also claims to support H.323 conferencing, but I have not had much success making it work with our H.323 system. I will admit that I have not tried in a while, though. --=20 R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 06:17:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D311065672 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:17:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D9C8FC0C for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:17:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by laai10 with SMTP id i10so3099387laa.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:17:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=z8dPl8BU6TYfhO+JLBcNgu4uTwXPkScLp0JAEFrX1TI=; b=m6yYUXcm4roTlAOFhrEnykHKIhk/yL7ZBbysQUn75l2XsACpn6MGy1SjZxOMIduNE4 7rdkTaRqpxwyLq2i64pN4kM/QmNQgAZmXz9DuD8byNKI0cNGQmttsdxGk995XjnjVfsz /9Pnt76/IQxAql6rXvdW82F4TntSMN77W7gpRmrr4ef4VYR6HrEUgHF3kxDDLIJTs//Q vPlrfGGPuEcHRWU9rlqy7zI9LQLuT/G7avIwJeTMIVsJDXcZIzsxI4XlnH18GI/wTukE 0lUqMAxDobYqtsK9hmvRcjlyMuv36wbKXSUZefhDzezCCgdBRXptry3ielVlH6TQhOeG 2O4g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.146.67 with SMTP id ta3mr7783194lab.27.1339827473622; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:17:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.107.170 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:17:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> <4FDBA4E7.40209@gmail.com> <4FDBE878.5010008@bluerosetech.com> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 02:17:53 -0400 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: Kevin Oberman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Skype 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:17:55 -0000 On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > You might look at ekiga. It is in ports and a standard part of Gnome. > It does sip and also claims to support H.323 conferencing, but I have > not had much success making it work with our H.323 system. I will > admit that I have not tried in a while, though. I remember looking at Ekiga when I was trying out different SIP clients last year, and what turned me off is the gnome thing. I am a KDE user, so Blink being a qt application means it is a KDE camp application. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 06:24:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A43F81065692 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:24:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f52.google.com (mail-qa0-f52.google.com [209.85.216.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592E98FC12 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:24:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qabj34 with SMTP id j34so162382qab.11 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:24:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lBMgwN76aElwsyFygBkj1RtlsgHDff/1M9F7jfYnrng=; b=zKCS1dbtVi2zpa/W29GC0VCygxXlW0JwWejbBVwxv+94TQU0lMBCqkciY5nVTzH7Iw Dxp8KOjbTlPhXQ+lrnQhCqfKhtx8N7mAl+tzpChSw3hBCFamqZkz/el5gzNKNzm9GesI 5o1riZi/rARyto98DiuNhVdaLH5NJSFQzjZ6kTDDJO8P6WhLqVRfaqUbjtU23r01Kp6N hc2vQ4+nnQWQmoU3byjIpGCSzGU/KQJcxggM3FyJO7pKiSrKy9sqEhZVKUJoKwxnlG5j DAi+V6C3DlqE4golwvqQA2KsuHuEWeBBa20NXWlAzZLkjq9wlJuSgNM+c8fuj5G9JOqf PW2A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.117.13 with SMTP id o13mr15690397qaq.73.1339827856413; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:24:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.187.5 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:24:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> <4FDBA4E7.40209@gmail.com> <4FDBE878.5010008@bluerosetech.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:24:16 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kevin Oberman To: Robert Simmons Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Skype 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:24:22 -0000 On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Robert Simmons wrot= e: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> You might look at ekiga. It is in ports and a standard part of Gnome. >> It does sip and also claims to support H.323 conferencing, but I have >> not had much success making it work with our H.323 system. I will >> admit that I have not tried in a while, though. > > I remember looking at Ekiga when I was trying out different SIP > clients last year, and what turned me off is the gnome thing. =C2=A0I am = a > KDE user, so Blink being a qt application means it is a KDE camp > application. Fair enough. I use gnome, but am never going to Gnome3, so I may be running KDE before long. If you run gnome, try ekiga. If you use KDE (and don't need video), go with blink. Both support open standards. --=20 R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 06:30:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B60106564A for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:30:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAFE18FC08 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [188.174.196.245] (helo=localhost.my.domain) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SfmWn-0006qq-QR for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:30:33 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5G6UWW4002900 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:30:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id q5G6UV4i002899 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:30:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:30:31 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120616063031.GA2871@tinyCurrent> References: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> <4FDBA4E7.40209@gmail.com> <4FDBE878.5010008@bluerosetech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT r214444 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 188.174.196.245 Subject: Re: Skype 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:30:35 -0000 El día Saturday, June 16, 2012 a las 02:17:53AM -0400, Robert Simmons escribió: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > You might look at ekiga. It is in ports and a standard part of Gnome. > > It does sip and also claims to support H.323 conferencing, but I have > > not had much success making it work with our H.323 system. I will > > admit that I have not tried in a while, though. > > I remember looking at Ekiga when I was trying out different SIP > clients last year, and what turned me off is the gnome thing. I am a > KDE user, so Blink being a qt application means it is a KDE camp > application. Ekiga can be compiled out of the sources in svn and git and runs fine in KDE: http://wiki.ekiga.org/index.php/Compile_your_own_SVN_version_of_Ekiga_on_FreeBSD matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11 | UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2 | FreeBSD since 2.2.5 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 08:28:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE661065670; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:28:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35668FC15; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so3613965wgb.31 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:28:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=Vp7zxfyHkPxk9Qq9PTatkiuLoxNOrftFJ2UUPNLLJq8=; b=cwi0cJqEciJ1AFx7RkAFS4NM8p0xo6Xi7kzVOBwOC25x1o7S3doez1aSCXQGicngYS NeMKoN7adKV2Zbn6AhtesErsy3JGfuxx4OtpYCUkV1nRLLvWP5eqi5vWw5Qv5SwSju79 gt5uzyACou2TtFRbTfo7WKeEWYmpII3VV5PUnM95VimyCr1D5LVcOQ286vYl9kwPHBaa Z6n1rW2mQBrYBh95kJ5jMGd0dWGx3J6DbzrLZeNtqbRJatvIbqrgfNjXOIHEfvUW62v1 XUGoXekFgiI19SUZL0rzey5B9jrTAnwS60nbXAJsQPGo0YWKDMV7vg1+V4jjKotYWznk h0Iw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.98.201 with SMTP id ek9mr10114124wib.7.1339835284640; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:28:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.102.4 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:28:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 04:28:04 -0400 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: johans@FreeBSD.org, "Julian H. Stacey" Subject: Re: Mk macros & print/texinfo/distinfo variant SHA256 SIZE X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:28:06 -0000 > Hi johans at FreeBSD.org > & cc ports@ > A 9.0-RELEASE ports fails on > cd print/texinfo ; make fetch > unless one imports newer values from current, ... > So how best to modify Makefile to not break on size & sha256 of > some but not all files ? > > The question can't be unique to this port, ... > Thoughts ? It isn't unique to this port. We already have such a construct: IGNOREFILES, (See ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, or http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-checksum.html .) Its use is discouraged because of security concerns. It would _not_ be wise to ignore checksums in the case of the texinfo sources -- instead, the maintainer can simply place copies of the unversioned sources in a separate, fully-versioned subdirectory on his mirror (e.g., ${PORTVERSION} rather than ${PORTVERSION:E}), so that they would be available there after they had been supplanted by newer versions on the upstream mirrors. The versioned sources could reside in an unversioned or partly-versioned subdirectory, to avoid unnecessary copies. The maintainer probably knows how to do this; it is described at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-distfiles.html#PORTING-MASTER-SITES-N b. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 08:57:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B716C106576E for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:57:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFCE8FC0C for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:57:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so3638335bkv.13 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:57:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=KNK66ptLHZsnvqdKNy5B3kwfJPzw6wuqqyZoU542O2M=; b=pwijpiy7c73tn9O7D/yG0QDusYQex4nSNw3jAQ44BeW5thrY0ZCf9K4Lz0FRVlbFws 7bVvWKbjXregsFCsVQ/VDgb2RYJUxASjEyitfuTCLw0AS1rzx4TIOP63bId/CxLvsgHK Vje2bh0vfyquLjcSX2S5KPVkrCFe6BcflXIJSe/fcnma4N8C7L74YGHFgTRFSkw0oru2 0dyg8vdDYu4MSwPDhRYZKtZ3hCMSEj7chvm+CErmUh8sVbLm2RO7dJ4ckSZr7uXrAUnq yrEMQRZQ4MqjpfcMIpKHgjkEIdDs6WlPHNPDrPFfRzkhDdYCfJi7MIqv0E6knEpWw/Jy 9m5Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.117.3 with SMTP id fk3mr3997344bkc.136.1339837046988; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:57:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.171.138 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:57:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.171.138 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:57:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120615171224.3667db09@scorpio> References: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> <4FDB7698.2010207@gthcfoundation.org> <20120615171224.3667db09@scorpio> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 09:57:26 +0100 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: FreeBSD not so free anymore ? Long live FreeBSD... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:57:28 -0000 On Jun 15, 2012 10:13 PM, "Jerry" wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:12:58 +0100 > Chris Rees articulated: > > >On 15 June 2012 18:53, Etienne Robillard wrote: > >> On 06/15/2012 01:08 PM, Jerry wrote: > >>> > >>> Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of > >>> getting it ported to FreeBSD? The latest version in ports is only > >>> 2.x. > >> > >> Why not? Thinking FreeBSD could become immune to remote exploits is > >> absurd. > >> > >> So without much efforts I can guess ports like Skype will become > >> more widespread now that FreeBSD has gived up on network security, > >> preferring to announce critical security vulnerabilities once the > >> exploit has been confirmed without any warnings. > >> > >> A good reason to stop using this bloated OS if you ask me and use > >> something more respectful to their users base relaying on STABLE for > >> stability reasons... > > > >New versions of Skype require ALSA. This is at their insistence. > > So, are you implying that ALSA (Advanced Linux Sound Architecture) > is never going to happen on a FreeBSD system? It is unnecessary. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 09:36:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCF2106566B for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 09:36:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0786F8FC14 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 09:36:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SfpQz-00024j-Mo for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:36:45 +0200 Received: from e176060233.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.176.60.233]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:36:45 +0200 Received: from rotkap by e176060233.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:36:45 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Heino Tiedemann Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:36:19 +0200 Organization: yes Lines: 12 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: e176060233.adsl.alicedsl.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (berkeley-unix) X-Face: v6Lci{Mw=kwHf$`7C?L-U#BHn7O\wqF-1qg#Vk%}nUQv\i^mM/.p=wU+cr)yXf#Ob+foOOxW; ir"QI!|25wG3`ywF)yh~@V.kKtr.qp+v.R; w?c@ZzM#!'/7r_+)$NjMN:]qo-]`&z~KlP}|cERO'%s9":6\ZnN/O List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 09:36:50 -0000 Hi, emacs 24 final is out There isn't an emacs 24 final in editors/emacs neither in editors/emacs-devel is there someone working on that? Heino From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 09:52:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C286106564A for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 09:52:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johans@stack.nl) Received: from mx1.stack.nl (relay02.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C2508FC08 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 09:52:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mx1.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 7805F3592F9; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:52:16 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-DCC: STAT_FI_X86_64_VIRTUAL: scanner01.stack.nl 1245; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on scanner01.stack.nl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Relay-Country: _RELAYCOUNTRY_ Received: from mud.stack.nl (mud.stack.nl [131.155.141.70]) by mx1.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89934358C63; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:52:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mud.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 801) id 7DCD89651C; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:52:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:52:14 +0200 From: Johan van Selst To: "Julian H. Stacey" Message-ID: <20120616095214.GA92982@mud.stack.nl> References: <201206151550.q5FFo0Gh044990@fire.js.berklix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201206151550.q5FFo0Gh044990@fire.js.berklix.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Mk macros & print/texinfo/distinfo variant SHA256 SIZE X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 09:52:18 -0000 --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Julian, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > A 9.0-RELEASE ports fails on > cd print/texinfo ; make fetch > unless one imports newer values from current, I copied the versions used by this port to my own server to prevent this failure, specificially for the case that the primary sources updates the files. The old files should still be retrievable from ftp.stack.nl if they are modified on the GNU servers. Maybe this secondary server was temporarily unavailable? That said, it is generally a good idea to keep your ports tree up-to-date, rather than to stick with a static snapshort ports tree =66rom the release date. Regards, Johan --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF4EAREIAAYFAk/cV0sACgkQAEpMHW8nCPT2JAD8CRmVRg2Du2hQTxeOLOX/d0YD pHPBDW3JC4EiPEGaGE4BAIZx38h+/5PwUQ8zMKz2UbFvxQOivpHd49oc6CjeCpDk =QlW5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 11:29:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050C3106564A for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:29:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (dns1.vizion2000.net [62.49.197.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8903F8FC16 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:29:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Graphics (graphics [62.49.197.51]) by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22026119C22 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 03:20:19 -0700 (PDT) From: "David Southwell ARPS" To: Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 04:28:57 -0700 Organization: Vision Communications Message-ID: <22C9525EEC41420FBF88DB39D9F67DDC@Graphics> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ac1LszfUFL5onz/sT+KZS9jd51hZJQ== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: kmail since upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:29:09 -0000 Hi I followed UPDATING instructions and deleted -r /akonadi immediately before running portupgrade -a which resulted in an upgrade to kde4 8.4. Now I seem to have a problem with kmail which when launched gives: Error kmail kmail encountered a fatal error and will terminate now. The error was: Failed to fetch resource collection. There seems to be no way to ignore the termination and set up kmail to read and access existing configuration data. This is for me a serious issue having many thousands of carefully catalogued emails. How do I set about recovery? The mails seem to be there - a I can access them via pop server onto another machine. But the indexing and cataloguing data does not move across. In the meantime I am using mail via the pop server & MS$ outlook - yuck Thanks in advance David From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 12:43:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931FA106564A for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:43:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@chronos.org.uk) Received: from chronos.org.uk (chronos-pt.tunnel.tserv5.lon1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f08:12b::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82D68FC08 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from workstation1.local.chronos.org.uk (workstation1.local.chronos.org.uk [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:12b::20]) (authenticated bits=0) by chronos.org.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5GChMcp092991 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:43:23 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matt@chronos.org.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 chronos.org.uk q5GChMcp092991 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=chronos.org.uk; s=mail; t=1339850603; bh=DsDgn16QbJgIvPSzDjiWxdd85uIlotx/Qw2wfnq+NkU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=NoW7WSqvvAF68cToPQxhMScWwk9JFbUiCJnFY7HHBU4IRPEXZiAXrKIuohPBp7hWI PxBWnt7FaA/EzTUG+xkRbDniXDnMa9DL1SaVZXxK7k6tt1bFkRnUOMSOCmNxs2rAIw BbLcAEEbQrPcqEUUFDFFVAduRIF4degBS2hh0qDY= Message-Id: <201206161243.q5GChMcp092991@chronos.org.uk> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:43:16 +0100 From: Matt Dawson To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20120616120047.88AF01065697@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20120616120047.88AF01065697@hub.freebsd.org> X-Face: ZC(F49t2uSJE}/7#!TBN:A\3:0wCZNx7YbLr6|9~$^!V&Q, q&]T:H>?\|ZZUt:{]iKK'f.( g-{z6!F@Wt#^bC-X8J4ZW2}RKBA"ak_zQMGw\YT"R%aL+?kk_mnXchE8VSy^<7I5]Z@p/\B. h"4xoqXS)n^eTJL4BeAz1&b`_Jwb\s3M626%1{X4s>A>56]Sn$b0nRFhfrTk]]Njd|!O Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/a=sAKwpWvK+3mX/ao=IxtPM"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (chronos.org.uk [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:12b::1]); Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:43:23 +0100 (BST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_FUTURE_48_96, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, MISSING_MID, SPF_PASS, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on central.local.chronos.org.uk Subject: Re: FreeBSD not so free anymore ? Long live FreeBSD... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:43:27 -0000 --Sig_/a=sAKwpWvK+3mX/ao=IxtPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:00:47 +0000 (UTC) Jerry wrote: > So, are you implying that ALSA (Advanced Linux Sound Architecture) > is never going to happen on a FreeBSD system? Our OSS sound subsystem works (and allows multiple access) without twenty different sound servers, mixers, shim layers and much faffing about, which is how we like it. So no, it's very unlikely we the users are going to put up with some putz wanting to swap that for something that only works when the planets are in the correct alignment after the use of some mystical incantation and the ritual sacrifice of a gnu just to get Skype (which is now owned by MS and is also now a conduit for yet more advertising) going. Sound is one of the things FreeBSD gets very right and most reasonably portable applications are just fine with our implementation of it. There's a compat port for those who want/need the ALSA API. --=20 Matt Dawson MTD15-RIPE GW0VNR --Sig_/a=sAKwpWvK+3mX/ao=IxtPM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/cf2oACgkQAmT9uY8euiKrJACePEh5xroZV5KU9ia2v+EtC8m1 yTgAniJ/+WNqb1OUXZN6MhLjpxJKjNz8 =IX91 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/a=sAKwpWvK+3mX/ao=IxtPM-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 13:18:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C53C1065673; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:18:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800978FC0C; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:18:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so3747080bkv.13 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:18:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ixiRCqGDhegQkSXOZnHXAoGB/Xf8JHoqGyp8uOwjCho=; b=fogXjFOB26OT/3uZcrdTYpMS3t9c5e/gldCX5r8JNF24zBjRAPukTBabyIxWDRW3JK NbEjG3AaWOO84xexUg8ePZZwnINZdhjBSG9pHP0HLQqJa7nX8H5CHra6T0BVK5qu+V+S r38v5dCWnQbrs2WPZYDzTQpllXF0AfuE9vbUSmDqBIH6HdiS2M6U7fC/mOHPM/5qTtzt gPtfQvCjPUBRdMv9oo840tb+fcsSQCPEPBIFXSdEqUJIXjnzoaz64kiD11feZdHwvjSX Qh2NvnzpYTGxgLogaj+ZK0WsgaC8g6c2iruFSV7cmtR70Ex1BOFP99uyr9+3x3xBF9ZO V8LQ== Received: by 10.204.153.15 with SMTP id i15mr4161846bkw.74.1339852727209; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:18:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.171.138 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:18:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:18:16 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: W4m4EBOTC1SJV2uJWLnyxvnTGns Message-ID: To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:18:49 -0000 On 13 June 2012 16:21, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > Dear all, > > After recent mention in this list that UNIQUENAME is not actually a > unique name for each port and how obviously non-sensical that is, plus > how it causes various problems with OPTIONS processing and how having a > proper UNIQUENAME will facilitate the new sub-package functionality > currently on the drawing board. > > So, here are some patches: > > =A0 http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/uniquenames.diff > > There's also some data on the effect these have on OPTIONSFILE and > UNIQUENAME values per port in > > =A0 http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/before/* > =A0 http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/after/* > > Summarizing the changes: > > =A0 * UNIQUENAME is now unique per port, and is primarily derived from > =A0 =A0 the port directory name. > > =A0 * Where the port directory name isn't unique (eg. accessibility/orca > =A0 =A0 vs graphics/orca) there is a new UNIQUEPREFIX variable to > =A0 =A0 distinguish the affected ports. =A0This is set for all the LANG > =A0 =A0 specific category ports (arabic, chinese, french, german, hebrew, > =A0 =A0 hungarian, japanese, korean, polish, portuguese, russian, > =A0 =A0 ukranian, vietnamese) to the standard 2 character abbreviation fo= r > =A0 =A0 that LANG. =A0Otherwise it is only set for the specific ports whe= re > =A0 =A0 there is a directory name collision, usually based on the categor= y > =A0 =A0 names. > > =A0 * To avoid accidental non-uniqueness, UNIQUENAME should be treated > =A0 =A0 as a read-only variable by port maintainers. =A0UNIQUEPREFIX shou= ld > =A0 =A0 only be set where necessary to resolve conflicts. =A0All instance= s of > =A0 =A0 ports setting UNIQUENAME have been removed: in the majority of > =A0 =A0 cases, this turned out to be a no-op as the new UNIQUENAME turned > =A0 =A0 out to be the same as what most ports were previously overriding > =A0 =A0 it to. That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, can't we just add the category to it? .for cat in ${CATEGORIES} UNIQUEPREFIX?=3D ${cat} .endfor (copying the code from PKGCATEGORY; might be better off moving the PKGCATEGORY code up higher and just using that). Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 13:30:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4DB3106566B for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwinlculp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A058FC08 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so3751966bkv.13 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:30:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6qre/7YiAY5ICo1BYK5pcgR8E/Gr/LTQcCZtBfWJ54E=; b=v27XXqc4rOsagIBRZuHrmUXd7EexC5Cm3KERSNYeSOJdv3bIZams5420AMJ7df2q8x mi/+qRFPVOZzU90yiHdMKHyvXGwjpMtQRCB6T6Yh3s0Ju0wEF9NpY2o7uL66R0U6qyaG phA38xPqPXThTkGwgEUMzexA/eVJo7x7OAaU7c0AFlraXpXtt1sIwYdd8VSwKMdIvxvN bK5izqEJzQuGMQczIucj4Dhkq4Z0dxAjezxbhHvbXxNPFX+W8S5ToDU7/D0rMYf8oTjF 0Tvm4k/JSIyg2qm1S+oKkgpPHd3QoGjPEEsnT/T1085bn/w98WZw0XtpJFeH/kr+efhK FL7A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.126.8 with SMTP id gu8mr674137bkc.61.1339853407291; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:30:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.171.135 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:30:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:30:07 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Edwin L. Culp W." To: freebsd-ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: kde 4.8.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:30:08 -0000 I've upgraded all kde4 to kde4.8.4 except for kdenetwork. It breaks as shown below but I have no idea where to begin to look to try and fix it. [ 12%] Building CXX object kget/CMakeFiles/kgetcore.dir/core/urlchecker.o [ 12%] Building CXX object kget/CMakeFiles/kgetcore.dir/settings.o [ 12%] Building CXX object kget/CMakeFiles/kgetcore.dir/core/transfertreemodel.o [ 12%] Building CXX object kget/CMakeFiles/kgetcore.dir/core/verifier.o [ 12%] Building CXX object kget/CMakeFiles/kgetcore.dir/transferadaptor.o [ 12%] Building CXX object kget/CMakeFiles/kgetcore.dir/verifieradaptor.o Linking CXX shared library ../lib/libkgetcore.so [ 12%] Built target kgetcore 1 error *** [all] Error code 2 1 error *** [do-build] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/kdenetwork4. Any suggestions as to how to fix it would be great. Thanks, ed Have a great weekend. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 13:40:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF228106566B; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:40:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6438A8FC0A; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:40:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfy7 with SMTP id fy7so2603395vcb.13 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:40:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=2G0T+A3BzA00w5r2gshWoc+YDeIcl/0nDigQgdIdMLA=; b=YSE4v23IGCBJVrv372Ns4AWuO/h6acKDEVh9MEDAA3hfJ9q80mH6biG1Uxy+b+ATt9 PeujymXYiJ/H8GD4X/M8YYzuFyhxVcABKW+QbgmpMmfKtClVzwkEqsJwbECZyZuZ5Qwp MYFOwwT2xpP7ThHPCzc6eq7ElzTRGgpj4F9iLo9bZHoAIPSBgL9AlLiMRkNgQN6b/rB5 BxCBHA+CnWTUhOYRtK2cNvVkC2xWny6lygHdqjZ1TnI9+1jRuPZMhro4zP7kj/zGCFOc 4Nc/rkToVRl0/ZXCY4U0PWnbRcycwMa+PGN1LNzGBNy2ZMDKQNzGV4tGWaIMiw9yW98D 4scw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.222.16 with SMTP id ie16mr4850770vcb.29.1339854021548; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:40:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.18.139 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:40:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:40:21 +0200 Message-ID: From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML , demon@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: p5-Locale-gettext fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:40:27 -0000 On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > What's wrong with devel/p5-Locale-gettext all of a sudden? Please ignore, this was a local problem. Turned out the the SSD was starting to corrupt files. Luckily I got a backup off the drive in time, and the SSSD was fixed by upgrading firmware on it. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 14:10:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1064B1065672 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C673B8FC0A for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:10:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65047E821; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:10:03 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4FDC93B6.10208@acsalaska.net> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:09:58 +0200 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Edwin L. Culp W." References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: kde 4.8.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:10:06 -0000 On 16-6-2012 15:30, Edwin L. Culp W. wrote: > I've upgraded all kde4 to kde4.8.4 except for kdenetwork. It breaks as > shown below but I have no idea where to begin to look to try and fix it. > > > [ 12%] Building CXX object kget/CMakeFiles/kgetcore.dir/core/urlchecker.o > [ 12%] Building CXX object kget/CMakeFiles/kgetcore.dir/settings.o > [ 12%] Building CXX object > kget/CMakeFiles/kgetcore.dir/core/transfertreemodel.o > [ 12%] Building CXX object kget/CMakeFiles/kgetcore.dir/core/verifier.o > [ 12%] Building CXX object kget/CMakeFiles/kgetcore.dir/transferadaptor.o > [ 12%] Building CXX object kget/CMakeFiles/kgetcore.dir/verifieradaptor.o > Linking CXX shared library ../lib/libkgetcore.so > [ 12%] Built target kgetcore > 1 error > *** [all] Error code 2 > 1 error > *** [do-build] Error code 1 Please retry as make -DDISABLE_MAKE_JOBS build. That will show us the real error. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 14:13:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE145106566C; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:13:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57CF98FC14; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:13:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5GEDcp4036559 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:13:44 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q5GEDcp4036559 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q5GEDcp4036559; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none Message-ID: <4FDC9488.2010509@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:13:28 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC4FBBC38A2AE410A7EF15968" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:13:53 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC4FBBC38A2AE410A7EF15968 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote: > That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, can't > we just add the category to it? >=20 > .for cat in ${CATEGORIES} > UNIQUEPREFIX?=3D ${cat} > .endfor >=20 > (copying the code from PKGCATEGORY; might be better off moving the > PKGCATEGORY code up higher and just using that). Yes. I thought long and hard about doing that, but I opted not to for two reasons: 1) Using the port name + a uniqueprefix where necessary produces what is close to the minimal change required to give every port a unique name. The UNIQUENAME won't actually change for quite a lot of ports under my scheme. 2) As a way of future-proofing against reorganizations of the ports tree. What tends to happen is that a new category is invented and a number of ports are moved into it. My way should avoid changing the UNIQUENAME in the majority of cases. Remember that changing the UNIQUENAME changes where the record of the port options are stored, and either we annoy a lot of users by making them fill in a buch of dialogues all over again, or we have to invent some complicated mechanism copy the old options settings to the new directory. (Yes -- this sort of thing will occur with the changes as written. It can't be avoided entirely.) Plus I think it would be more natural and easier for maintainers and end-users to talk about (say) "phpmyadmin" rather than "databases-phpmyadmin." Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enigC4FBBC38A2AE410A7EF15968 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/clJIACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzigQCfV8JlFWkVX1W8ptHUE1gtXozR VgMAnjjSCmDOIBbr2ZdxIvM1nhfS0z24 =p520 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC4FBBC38A2AE410A7EF15968-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 14:27:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB14106564A; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:27:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887718FC12; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:27:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so3775956bkv.13 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 07:27:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3WzdeaS76fPUmDjc+75CDAMv36NF2p5Brt8PThAS3QA=; b=kxv2wnANaK1MGpmc0i/s3RMzkTmhJi/7heqmhlVE30ERpSG4N5k2PzrN8/07jm6A5M dQ/m5tUb8SeKbbvFU9weDj/46UMcu0pki2qiaUoaIiXTTIMrtBuClLCyB/kVen0G8f0m svDNTMv/m9J7oenWHxFmVm60o82MOlnziLRWhKl9u5ypXMW04GAi0xzC/J80N9XAj5se pj1NNM3E0SnKm4Du50bCG2thZYSxO0bLIttzdjtNJ9s+qQlJu63L6B5IsoEeBpwscTII slQGeSpBEoyBiXhlDwljgV9aIsgKdTsFoE5rsSr44hLHbSKNcAz6bRg3EgZeIbCFJwhx cmRg== Received: by 10.205.117.3 with SMTP id fk3mr4261975bkc.136.1339856833247; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 07:27:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.171.138 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 07:26:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FDC9488.2010509@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> <4FDC9488.2010509@FreeBSD.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:26:43 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: JHYz-tLuuYSkiHvAhVyPCXz43wA Message-ID: To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:27:15 -0000 On 16 June 2012 15:13, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote: >> That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, can't >> we just add the category to it? >> >> .for cat in ${CATEGORIES} >> UNIQUEPREFIX?=3D ${cat} >> .endfor >> >> (copying the code from PKGCATEGORY; might be better off moving the >> PKGCATEGORY code up higher and just using that). > > Yes. =A0I thought long and hard about doing that, but I opted not to for > two reasons: > > =A0 1) Using the port name + a uniqueprefix where necessary produces what > =A0 =A0 =A0is close to the minimal change required to give every port a > =A0 =A0 =A0unique name. =A0The UNIQUENAME won't actually change for quite= a > =A0 =A0 =A0lot of ports under my scheme. > > =A0 2) As a way of future-proofing against reorganizations of the ports > =A0 =A0 =A0tree. =A0What tends to happen is that a new category is invent= ed > =A0 =A0 =A0and a number of ports are moved into it. =A0My way should avoi= d > =A0 =A0 =A0changing the UNIQUENAME in the majority of cases. > > Remember that changing the UNIQUENAME changes where the record of the > port options are stored, and either we annoy a lot of users by making > them fill in a buch of dialogues all over again, or we have to invent > some complicated mechanism copy the old options settings to the new > directory. =A0(Yes -- this sort of thing will occur with the changes as > written. =A0It can't be avoided entirely.) > > Plus I think it would be more natural and easier for maintainers and > end-users to talk about (say) "phpmyadmin" rather than > "databases-phpmyadmin." Very thoughtful, OK. You'll also need some sort of cronjob then to yell at people who duplicate UNIQUENAME then, rather like erwin's LATEST_LINK script; ports/Tools/scripts/check-latest-link. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 14:39:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1CE1065679 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:39:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6C88FC0C for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58437E84A for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:39:11 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4FDC9A8B.2040701@acsalaska.net> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:39:07 +0200 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:39:14 -0000 On 16-6-2012 15:18, Chris Rees wrote: > On 13 June 2012 16:21, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> After recent mention in this list that UNIQUENAME is not actually a >> unique name for each port and how obviously non-sensical that is, plus >> how it causes various problems with OPTIONS processing and how having a >> proper UNIQUENAME will facilitate the new sub-package functionality >> currently on the drawing board. >> >> So, here are some patches: >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/uniquenames.diff >> >> There's also some data on the effect these have on OPTIONSFILE and >> UNIQUENAME values per port in >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/before/* >> http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/after/* >> >> Summarizing the changes: >> >> * UNIQUENAME is now unique per port, and is primarily derived from >> the port directory name. >> >> * Where the port directory name isn't unique (eg. accessibility/orca >> vs graphics/orca) there is a new UNIQUEPREFIX variable to >> distinguish the affected ports. This is set for all the LANG >> specific category ports (arabic, chinese, french, german, hebrew, >> hungarian, japanese, korean, polish, portuguese, russian, >> ukranian, vietnamese) to the standard 2 character abbreviation for >> that LANG. Otherwise it is only set for the specific ports where >> there is a directory name collision, usually based on the category >> names. >> >> * To avoid accidental non-uniqueness, UNIQUENAME should be treated >> as a read-only variable by port maintainers. UNIQUEPREFIX should >> only be set where necessary to resolve conflicts. All instances of >> ports setting UNIQUENAME have been removed: in the majority of >> cases, this turned out to be a no-op as the new UNIQUENAME turned >> out to be the same as what most ports were previously overriding >> it to. > > That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, can't > we just add the category to it? > > .for cat in ${CATEGORIES} > UNIQUEPREFIX?= ${cat} > .endfor I'm also for getting rid of the badly chosen default. Since origins are unique within the tree, we can simply use: UNIQUENAME=${PORTORIGIN:S,/,____,} Then once you get childports (tis the new and improved name for subpackages) you can tack that on there in the same way. On 16-6-2012 16:13, Matthew Seaman wrote: > 2) As a way of future-proofing against reorganizations of the ports > tree. What tends to happen is that a new category is invented > and a number of ports are moved into it. My way should avoid > changing the UNIQUENAME in the majority of cases. This causes exactly the problem you're trying to solve. When ports get moved to a new location, they are for all intents and purposes new ports. Using an origin-based UNIQUENAME makes the most sense and does the right thing for the common case. The issue here is that pkgng has problems with the MOVED format and wishes to tack on to UNIQUENAME to solve it's problem. The obvious solution here is to come up with a better MOVED format. Although, to me it isn't clear what the problem is. I doubt it's the MOVED file, it's probably more to do with ports that change their name based on dependency. If you really want to track a port even if it's changing locations, then you really should use some kind of GUID and provide a query interface for the set options -- which we already have. You could probably generate the GUIDs on port creation with an svn hook. > Remember that changing the UNIQUENAME changes where the record of the > port options are stored, and either we annoy a lot of users by making > them fill in a buch of dialogues all over again, or we have to invent > some complicated mechanism copy the old options settings to the new > directory. If you change the default and ensure it is unique by design, then migrating options for the user isn't that hard: OLDSCHEME=${PKGNAMEPREFIX}${PORTNAME} OLDOPTIONSFILE=${PORT_DBDIR}/${OLDSCHEME}/options .if exists(${OLDOPTIONSFILE}) _CONFIG_SEQ=migrate-config ${CONFIG_SEQ} .endif migrate-config: @${ECHO_CMD} "An options file has been found using the old" @${ECHO_CMD} " naming scheme. Would you like to migrate these" @${ECHO_CMD} " settings?" ...etc > Plus I think it would be more natural and easier for maintainers and > end-users to talk about (say) "phpmyadmin" rather than > "databases-phpmyadmin." I doubt UNIQUENAME is used in casual end user to maintainer conversations. :) -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 14:53:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4118F106564A; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:53:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229518FC08; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5GEriKA040672; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:53:44 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5GErhrl040671; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:53:43 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:53:41 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20120616145341.GK98264@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> <4FDC9488.2010509@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nzri8VXeXB/g5ayr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FDC9488.2010509@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Chris Rees , freebsd-ports Subject: Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:53:44 -0000 --nzri8VXeXB/g5ayr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 03:13:28PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote: > > That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, can't > > we just add the category to it? > >=20 > > .for cat in ${CATEGORIES} > > UNIQUEPREFIX?=3D ${cat} > > .endfor > >=20 > > (copying the code from PKGCATEGORY; might be better off moving the > > PKGCATEGORY code up higher and just using that). >=20 > Yes. I thought long and hard about doing that, but I opted not to for > two reasons: >=20 > 1) Using the port name + a uniqueprefix where necessary produces what > is close to the minimal change required to give every port a > unique name. The UNIQUENAME won't actually change for quite a > lot of ports under my scheme. >=20 > 2) As a way of future-proofing against reorganizations of the ports > tree. What tends to happen is that a new category is invented > and a number of ports are moved into it. My way should avoid > changing the UNIQUENAME in the majority of cases. >=20 > Remember that changing the UNIQUENAME changes where the record of the > port options are stored, and either we annoy a lot of users by making > them fill in a buch of dialogues all over again, or we have to invent > some complicated mechanism copy the old options settings to the new > directory. (Yes -- this sort of thing will occur with the changes as > written. It can't be avoided entirely.) >=20 > Plus I think it would be more natural and easier for maintainers and > end-users to talk about (say) "phpmyadmin" rather than > "databases-phpmyadmin." >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Matthew >=20 > --=20 > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 I'm strongly against adding something related to the category automatically. Because I'm thinking about binary managerment, adding PKGCATEGORY to unique= name would mean a package tracking will be lots in case of moving a port from a category to another. Currently in pkgng a package is identified by its orig= in and thus can't survive automatically from a move, because origin changes. Having a uniquename able to survive from move can help a lot avoiding compl= ex detection of move and keeping tracking easily the package. What could be added is a UNIQUENAMESUFFIX to be able to have a finer grain = name. regards, Bapt --nzri8VXeXB/g5ayr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/cnfUACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzFCACfQBZ8swU6enG398wLxj1MylTO dbcAn0kwDPTjPZ+gWQIs2b2Kme1VcxSy =GmKs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nzri8VXeXB/g5ayr-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 15:06:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54D5106566C; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:06:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rflynn@acsalaska.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7979C8FC0A; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (squeeze.lan.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.30]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C9A7E846; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 07:06:40 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <4FDCA0FC.3050407@acsalaska.net> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 17:06:36 +0200 From: Mel Flynn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> <4FDC9488.2010509@FreeBSD.org> <20120616145341.GK98264@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20120616145341.GK98264@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chris Rees , Matthew Seaman , freebsd-ports Subject: Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:06:42 -0000 On 16-6-2012 16:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 03:13:28PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote: >>> That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, can't >>> we just add the category to it? >>> >>> .for cat in ${CATEGORIES} >>> UNIQUEPREFIX?= ${cat} >>> .endfor >>> >>> (copying the code from PKGCATEGORY; might be better off moving the >>> PKGCATEGORY code up higher and just using that). >> >> Yes. I thought long and hard about doing that, but I opted not to for >> two reasons: >> >> 1) Using the port name + a uniqueprefix where necessary produces what >> is close to the minimal change required to give every port a >> unique name. The UNIQUENAME won't actually change for quite a >> lot of ports under my scheme. >> >> 2) As a way of future-proofing against reorganizations of the ports >> tree. What tends to happen is that a new category is invented >> and a number of ports are moved into it. My way should avoid >> changing the UNIQUENAME in the majority of cases. >> >> Remember that changing the UNIQUENAME changes where the record of the >> port options are stored, and either we annoy a lot of users by making >> them fill in a buch of dialogues all over again, or we have to invent >> some complicated mechanism copy the old options settings to the new >> directory. (Yes -- this sort of thing will occur with the changes as >> written. It can't be avoided entirely.) >> >> Plus I think it would be more natural and easier for maintainers and >> end-users to talk about (say) "phpmyadmin" rather than >> "databases-phpmyadmin." >> >> Cheers, >> >> Matthew >> >> -- >> Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. >> PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey >> >> >> >> > > I'm strongly against adding something related to the category automatically. > Because I'm thinking about binary managerment, adding PKGCATEGORY to uniquename > would mean a package tracking will be lots in case of moving a port from a > category to another. Currently in pkgng a package is identified by its origin > and thus can't survive automatically from a move, because origin changes. You should solve this using a better index format. I figured out years ago that the INDEX format used by the ports system is not a good format for binary upgrades. -- Mel From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 15:06:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A6B1065722 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:06:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D203A8FC17 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SfuaO-0006TJ-E7 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 17:06:48 +0200 Received: from 201.82.202.92 ([201.82.202.92]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 17:06:48 +0200 Received: from rakuco by 201.82.202.92 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 17:06:48 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Raphael Kubo da Costa Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:06:38 -0300 Lines: 7 Message-ID: <87y5nnz475.fsf@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FDC93B6.10208@acsalaska.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 201.82.202.92 User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.0.93 (berkeley-unix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ov7oRD8XlNjxAwW6X6cLH6UgkYs= Subject: Re: kde 4.8.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:06:58 -0000 Mel Flynn writes: > Please retry as make -DDISABLE_MAKE_JOBS build. > That will show us the real error. And please have CMAKE_VERBOSE set so we can see the full command line of the call that's causing problems. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 15:07:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE7C106566B; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:07:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D73B8FC1F; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:07:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5GF7mIl037482 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:07:49 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q5GF7mIl037482 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q5GF7mIl037482; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none Message-ID: <4FDCA13D.8010302@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:07:41 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> <4FDC9488.2010509@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE0FCD84DA310F0481165A415" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:07:53 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE0FCD84DA310F0481165A415 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 16/06/2012 15:26, Chris Rees wrote: > On 16 June 2012 15:13, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote: >>> That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, can'= t >>> we just add the category to it? >>> >>> .for cat in ${CATEGORIES} >>> UNIQUEPREFIX?=3D ${cat} >>> .endfor >>> >>> (copying the code from PKGCATEGORY; might be better off moving the >>> PKGCATEGORY code up higher and just using that). >> >> Yes. I thought long and hard about doing that, but I opted not to for= >> two reasons: >> >> 1) Using the port name + a uniqueprefix where necessary produces wha= t >> is close to the minimal change required to give every port a >> unique name. The UNIQUENAME won't actually change for quite a >> lot of ports under my scheme. >> >> 2) As a way of future-proofing against reorganizations of the ports >> tree. What tends to happen is that a new category is invented >> and a number of ports are moved into it. My way should avoid >> changing the UNIQUENAME in the majority of cases. >> >> Remember that changing the UNIQUENAME changes where the record of the >> port options are stored, and either we annoy a lot of users by making >> them fill in a buch of dialogues all over again, or we have to invent >> some complicated mechanism copy the old options settings to the new >> directory. (Yes -- this sort of thing will occur with the changes as >> written. It can't be avoided entirely.) >> >> Plus I think it would be more natural and easier for maintainers and >> end-users to talk about (say) "phpmyadmin" rather than >> "databases-phpmyadmin." >=20 > Very thoughtful, OK. You'll also need some sort of cronjob then to > yell at people who duplicate UNIQUENAME then, rather like erwin's > LATEST_LINK script; ports/Tools/scripts/check-latest-link. http://people.freebsd.org/~matthew/uniquename/uniquecheck needs to grow the capability to send e-mails. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enigE0FCD84DA310F0481165A415 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/coUQACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwHnwCePr8UcRbJZyLs5ACGK9jLhWUi S68AnR4I7GLRZkzzuGZj3apkpvH+fGpd =51de -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE0FCD84DA310F0481165A415-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 15:11:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9285106566B; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:11:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA05B8FC0A; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5GFBRTk059120; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:11:27 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5GFBRQB059119; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:11:27 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@freebsd.org using -f Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 17:11:25 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Mel Flynn Message-ID: <20120616151125.GL98264@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> <4FDC9488.2010509@FreeBSD.org> <20120616145341.GK98264@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FDCA0FC.3050407@acsalaska.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UUBKWyapWpFAak7q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FDCA0FC.3050407@acsalaska.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Chris Rees , Matthew Seaman , freebsd-ports Subject: Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:11:28 -0000 --UUBKWyapWpFAak7q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 05:06:36PM +0200, Mel Flynn wrote: > On 16-6-2012 16:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 03:13:28PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > >> On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote: > >>> That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, can't > >>> we just add the category to it? > >>> > >>> .for cat in ${CATEGORIES} > >>> UNIQUEPREFIX?=3D ${cat} > >>> .endfor > >>> > >>> (copying the code from PKGCATEGORY; might be better off moving the > >>> PKGCATEGORY code up higher and just using that). > >> > >> Yes. I thought long and hard about doing that, but I opted not to for > >> two reasons: > >> > >> 1) Using the port name + a uniqueprefix where necessary produces wh= at > >> is close to the minimal change required to give every port a > >> unique name. The UNIQUENAME won't actually change for quite a > >> lot of ports under my scheme. > >> > >> 2) As a way of future-proofing against reorganizations of the ports > >> tree. What tends to happen is that a new category is invented > >> and a number of ports are moved into it. My way should avoid > >> changing the UNIQUENAME in the majority of cases. > >> > >> Remember that changing the UNIQUENAME changes where the record of the > >> port options are stored, and either we annoy a lot of users by making > >> them fill in a buch of dialogues all over again, or we have to invent > >> some complicated mechanism copy the old options settings to the new > >> directory. (Yes -- this sort of thing will occur with the changes as > >> written. It can't be avoided entirely.) > >> > >> Plus I think it would be more natural and easier for maintainers and > >> end-users to talk about (say) "phpmyadmin" rather than > >> "databases-phpmyadmin." > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Matthew > >> > >> --=20 > >> Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. > >> PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey > >> > >> > >> > >> > >=20 > > I'm strongly against adding something related to the category automatic= ally. > > Because I'm thinking about binary managerment, adding PKGCATEGORY to un= iquename > > would mean a package tracking will be lots in case of moving a port fro= m a > > category to another. Currently in pkgng a package is identified by its = origin > > and thus can't survive automatically from a move, because origin change= s. >=20 > You should solve this using a better index format. I figured out years > ago that the INDEX format used by the ports system is not a good format > for binary upgrades. >=20 > >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Mel Before saying that you should have a look at what pkgng is. pkgng doesn't g= ive a shit about index. and changing the INDEX won't solve that if you have no way unique way to identify a package you are doomed, have a look at every single package management system in the world, all of the sane one with real binary management system have a unique way to identify packages. We don't ! Bapt --UUBKWyapWpFAak7q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/coh0ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ews7QCfd9j80KV2sQMFlvSq7RCFYFA+ a60AnjBa5/3yaxAzFW6Rje+EM57uWNwy =MH2L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UUBKWyapWpFAak7q-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 15:15:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A995F1065670; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:15:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87EC98FC12; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5GFFDgB060440; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:15:13 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5GFFDjK060438; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:15:13 GMT (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@freebsd.org using -f Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 17:15:08 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Mel Flynn Message-ID: <20120616151508.GM98264@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> <4FDC9488.2010509@FreeBSD.org> <20120616145341.GK98264@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FDCA0FC.3050407@acsalaska.net> <20120616151125.GL98264@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DheUW4aQn8WJk6WR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120616151125.GL98264@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Chris Rees , Matthew Seaman , freebsd-ports Subject: Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:15:13 -0000 --DheUW4aQn8WJk6WR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 05:11:25PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 05:06:36PM +0200, Mel Flynn wrote: > > On 16-6-2012 16:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 03:13:28PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > >> On 16/06/2012 14:18, Chris Rees wrote: > > >>> That's great-- though rather than patching colliding-only ports, ca= n't > > >>> we just add the category to it? > > >>> > > >>> .for cat in ${CATEGORIES} > > >>> UNIQUEPREFIX?=3D ${cat} > > >>> .endfor > > >>> > > >>> (copying the code from PKGCATEGORY; might be better off moving the > > >>> PKGCATEGORY code up higher and just using that). > > >> > > >> Yes. I thought long and hard about doing that, but I opted not to f= or > > >> two reasons: > > >> > > >> 1) Using the port name + a uniqueprefix where necessary produces = what > > >> is close to the minimal change required to give every port a > > >> unique name. The UNIQUENAME won't actually change for quite a > > >> lot of ports under my scheme. > > >> > > >> 2) As a way of future-proofing against reorganizations of the por= ts > > >> tree. What tends to happen is that a new category is invented > > >> and a number of ports are moved into it. My way should avoid > > >> changing the UNIQUENAME in the majority of cases. > > >> > > >> Remember that changing the UNIQUENAME changes where the record of the > > >> port options are stored, and either we annoy a lot of users by making > > >> them fill in a buch of dialogues all over again, or we have to invent > > >> some complicated mechanism copy the old options settings to the new > > >> directory. (Yes -- this sort of thing will occur with the changes as > > >> written. It can't be avoided entirely.) > > >> > > >> Plus I think it would be more natural and easier for maintainers and > > >> end-users to talk about (say) "phpmyadmin" rather than > > >> "databases-phpmyadmin." > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> > > >> Matthew > > >> > > >> --=20 > > >> Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. > > >> PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >=20 > > > I'm strongly against adding something related to the category automat= ically. > > > Because I'm thinking about binary managerment, adding PKGCATEGORY to = uniquename > > > would mean a package tracking will be lots in case of moving a port f= rom a > > > category to another. Currently in pkgng a package is identified by it= s origin > > > and thus can't survive automatically from a move, because origin chan= ges. > >=20 > > You should solve this using a better index format. I figured out years > > ago that the INDEX format used by the ports system is not a good format > > for binary upgrades. > >=20 > > > >=20 > >=20 > > --=20 > > Mel >=20 > Before saying that you should have a look at what pkgng is. pkgng doesn't= give a > shit about index. and changing the INDEX won't solve that if you have no = way > unique way to identify a package you are doomed, have a look at every sin= gle > package management system in the world, all of the sane one with real bin= ary > management system have a unique way to identify packages. We don't ! >=20 > Bapt Forgot to say that origin is a good way to identify a package until we will= have sub packages (which we really need) sub package will mean N packages will have the same origin. that way origin= will not become unique anymore. regards, Bapt --DheUW4aQn8WJk6WR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/covwACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyJvwCggEjVZQtCCRVXHRDtK1O9KniU YM4AnRwSozyS4Kpxeq8IJiJoi9iPPV5w =w2A0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DheUW4aQn8WJk6WR-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 15:26:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0436106566B for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:26:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 552438FC14 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sfutt-00028b-BA for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 17:26:57 +0200 Received: from e176060233.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.176.60.233]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 17:26:57 +0200 Received: from rotkap by e176060233.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 17:26:57 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Heino Tiedemann Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 17:18:17 +0200 Organization: yes Lines: 51 Message-ID: References: <20120507135600.fb20bcf6.mazhe@alkumuna.eu> <201205071538.03765.lumiwa@gmail.com> <4FBBF245.2050906@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: e176060233.adsl.alicedsl.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (berkeley-unix) X-Face: v6Lci{Mw=kwHf$`7C?L-U#BHn7O\wqF-1qg#Vk%}nUQv\i^mM/.p=wU+cr)yXf#Ob+foOOxW; ir"QI!|25wG3`ywF)yh~@V.kKtr.qp+v.R; w?c@ZzM#!'/7r_+)$NjMN:]qo-]`&z~KlP}|cERO'%s9":6\ZnN/O List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:26:59 -0000 Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Heino Tiedemann wrote on 22.05.2012 23:56: >> ajtiM wrote: >> >>> On Monday 07 May 2012 06:56:00 Matthieu Volat wrote: >>>> Hello everybody, >>>> >>>> As gimp 2.8 was released a few days ago, I naturaly tried to get it working >>>> on my 9.0-RELEASE desktop :) >>>> >>>> I "forked" a few ports directories to bump gimp and the dependancies to the >>>> needed versions. Everything seems to work quite nicely. >>>> >>>> I'm sure those modifications cannot be pushed right now in the ports tree, >>>> there are quite a few version bump that would impact other ports, but I'd >>>> like to share them anyway. >>>> >>>> I've attached a tarball of my files, here are the list of modified ports: >>>> glib20 -> 2.30.2 >>>> gio-fam-backend -> 2.30.2 >>>> atk -> 2.2.0 >>>> gtk -> 2.24.10 >>>> gdk-pixbuf2 -> 2.24.1 >>>> pango -> 1.29.4 >>>> babl -> 0.1.10 >>>> gegl -> 0.2.0 >>>> gimp -> 2.8.0 >>>> >>>> I hope it can help people wanting to upgrade to the lastest version of >>>> gimp. >>> >>> I like to give a try but I am not familliar with ports (I never dd). Maybe we >>> will be lucky and GIMP 2.8 show in ports soon. >> >> Is here any maintainer who can tell - is there a gimp 2.8 at the and of >> the tunnel? :) When it is there? >> >> Heino > > There is a patch from Koop Mast, that updates gimp to 2.8 (and > gegl/babl too). But new gimp also requires more fresh atk and all of > this needs testing. I can't recall the link for kwm's patch, and will > not put one that I have somewhere, because there is possibility that > there is updated version of it. Koop, can you please post that patch > link here so the interested people can check it on their own? What about now - 3 weeks later? Is there any timeline for the actual gimp? Heino From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 15:49:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A70106564A; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:49:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18618FC08; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5GFnUTa038106 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:49:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q5GFnUTa038106 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q5GFnUTa038106; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none Message-ID: <4FDCAB02.2040701@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:49:22 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> <4FDC9488.2010509@FreeBSD.org> <20120616145341.GK98264@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20120616145341.GK98264@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigCC8E9902A77F2F6AF6C729A7" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Chris Rees , freebsd-ports Subject: Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:49:39 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigCC8E9902A77F2F6AF6C729A7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 16/06/2012 15:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > What could be added is a UNIQUENAMESUFFIX to be able to have a finer gr= ain name. That's certainly possible, but I was thinking about your plans to create sub-packages. As I understand it, you'll be building and installing each port into a staging area, and then creating a number of different packages from what's in the staging area. So for a port foo, you might create: foo-0.99 --- the foo application and libfoo.so.0 shared library foo-docs-0.99 --- documentation foo-examples-0.99 --- example configurations etc. foo-devlibs-0.99 --- *.h headers, libfoo.a static lib, profiling libs and other things useful for developers. and so forth. So these are distinct packages all from one port with its own UNIQUENAME and hence all using that port's OPTIONS settings, and all built in one block. Having UNIQUENAMESUFFIX for docs, examples, devlibs etc. would imply all of those are entirely separate ports, like the way bacula and bacula-docs are handled at the moment. I can see there will need to be some sort of SUBPACKAGESUFFIXES variable and associated gubbins in the ports makefiles, to do that, plus something like tagging the entries in pkg-plist to identify which sub-package they should belong to. Trying to mix that with UNIQUENAMESUFFIXes would get pretty complicated. Not to mention the question of foo-devel -- is that the devel sub-package of the foo port, or a separate foo-devel port?[*] Cheers, Matthew [*] Hmmm... maybe sub-packages suffixes should use a different separator: foo-0.99, foo--docs-0.99, foo--examples-0.99 foo--devlibs-0.99 (?) --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enigCC8E9902A77F2F6AF6C729A7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/cqwkACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzNGwCcDDDTwhbMzFxxK2gxOdEQkQKv JJEAnRG7IEQ4aNTkoQEYwhZGO5ss8LgE =1LF/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigCC8E9902A77F2F6AF6C729A7-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 16:04:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4061E1065670; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:04:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B318FC08; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:04:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5GG3x9U007076; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:03:59 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5GG3xwm007075; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:03:59 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:03:57 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20120616160356.GN98264@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> <4FDC9488.2010509@FreeBSD.org> <20120616145341.GK98264@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FDCAB02.2040701@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7fwXp2o0gOrkU5lS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FDCAB02.2040701@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Chris Rees , freebsd-ports Subject: Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:04:00 -0000 --7fwXp2o0gOrkU5lS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 04:49:22PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 16/06/2012 15:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > What could be added is a UNIQUENAMESUFFIX to be able to have a finer gr= ain name. >=20 > That's certainly possible, but I was thinking about your plans to create > sub-packages. As I understand it, you'll be building and installing > each port into a staging area, and then creating a number of different > packages from what's in the staging area. >=20 > So for a port foo, you might create: >=20 > foo-0.99 --- the foo application and libfoo.so.0 shared > library > foo-docs-0.99 --- documentation > foo-examples-0.99 --- example configurations etc. > foo-devlibs-0.99 --- *.h headers, libfoo.a static lib, profiling > libs and other things useful for developers. >=20 > and so forth. So these are distinct packages all from one port with its > own UNIQUENAME and hence all using that port's OPTIONS settings, and all > built in one block. >=20 > Having UNIQUENAMESUFFIX for docs, examples, devlibs etc. would imply all > of those are entirely separate ports, like the way bacula and > bacula-docs are handled at the moment. >=20 > I can see there will need to be some sort of SUBPACKAGESUFFIXES variable > and associated gubbins in the ports makefiles, to do that, > plus something like tagging the entries in pkg-plist to identify which > sub-package they should belong to. >=20 > Trying to mix that with UNIQUENAMESUFFIXes would get pretty complicated. > Not to mention the question of foo-devel -- is that the devel > sub-package of the foo port, or a separate foo-devel port?[*] Yes you are right regards, Bapt --7fwXp2o0gOrkU5lS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/crmwACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ew0XwCfYNBZVYvAjscG3Xy2CN4Xlg1B VtkAn1Y0CoKOaciRXmDWmKr2jLXyfGXE =Ijl6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7fwXp2o0gOrkU5lS-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 16:20:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C43106566B; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:20:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwinlculp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8998FC1F; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi18 with SMTP id i18so3823318bkv.13 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 09:20:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=0xXcNwaS4nrAXfdXlpsHvqHBc732AkPfb9mQMcFV9bI=; b=X06FZCQDtghb/10Abj81fOcb7YoouR8Ck2WOatyeRLylw7j1hUa6X+CN6UiZuVz7xl vjLRdGGv7lmOq0ovjO2NlXR/coBVoDGlhT+BcONK6MLdRpyLBEs4Z7aDDELTa8w5XUW+ Q2+9g4iYR1irUe6cH7oJ25+XKrJcXQ3r9oD6aah7xopxNLmN5zKdolHcSNOV3H5JIlWe asASvfxI5bklxZfOBc013X0dXb725rIKe9t61EVKaPLS4cAmJVz+aKS4E8HfHQu16OA1 6p+mvGe01OR80fvdrCnwqv6yV6YaBNEM/2lxII1RkBzGpwHcxFgIyeyHKkoQZI51UFmW BoRg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.152.6 with SMTP id e6mr4192617bkw.18.1339863614492; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 09:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.171.135 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 09:20:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y5nnz475.fsf@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FDC93B6.10208@acsalaska.net> <87y5nnz475.fsf@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:20:14 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Edwin L. Culp W." To: Raphael Kubo da Costa Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=0015175df1faca0f4904c2994eaa X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kde 4.8.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:20:21 -0000 --0015175df1faca0f4904c2994eaa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2012/6/16 Raphael Kubo da Costa > Mel Flynn writes: > > > Please retry as make -DDISABLE_MAKE_JOBS build. > > That will show us the real error. > > And please have CMAKE_VERBOSE set so we can see the full command line of > the call that's causing problems. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > It broke at : 73%] Building CXX object kopete/protocols/jabber/googletalk/libjingle/talk/examples/call/CMakeFiles/call.dir/console.o^Jcd /usr/ports/net/kdenetwork4/ > /usr/local/lib/libmediastreamer.so: undefined reference to `snd_pcm_hw_params@ALSA_0.9' I have attached a file with this begining to the end. Hopefully this will make it easier. Thanks, ed --0015175df1faca0f4904c2994eaa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="kdenetwork-4.8.4Build.txt" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="kdenetwork-4.8.4Build.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_h3iw3bhn0 L3Vzci9wb3J0cy9uZXQva2RlbmV0d29yazQgIyBlY2hvICJeSlsgNzMlXSBCdWlsZGluZyBDWFgg b2JqZWN0IGtvcGV0ZS9wcm90b2NvbHMvamFiYmVyL2dvb2dsZXRhbGsvbGliamluZ2xlL3RhbGsv ZXhhbXBsZXMvY2FsbC9DTWFrZUZpbGVzL2NhbGwuZGlyL2NvbnNvbGUub15KY2QgL3Vzci9wb3J0 cy9uZXQva2RlbmV0d29yazQvID4KL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9saWIvbGlibWVkaWFzdHJlYW1lci5zbzog dW5kZWZpbmVkIHJlZmVyZW5jZSB0byBgc25kX3BjbV9od19wYXJhbXNAQUxTQV8wLjknCi91c3Iv bG9jYWwvbGliL2xpYm1lZGlhc3RyZWFtZXIuc286IHVuZGVmaW5lZCByZWZlcmVuY2UgdG8gYHNu ZF9taXhlcl9zZWxlbV9nZXRfcGxheWJhY2tfdm9sdW1lX3JhbmdlQEFMU0FfMC45JwovdXNyL2xv Y2FsL2xpYi9saWJtZWRpYXN0cmVhbWVyLnNvOiB1bmRlZmluZWQgcmVmZXJlbmNlIHRvIGBzbmRf bWl4ZXJfZmlyc3RfZWxlbUBBTFNBXzAuOScKL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9saWIvbGlibWVkaWFzdHJlYW1l ci5zbzogdW5kZWZpbmVkIHJlZmVyZW5jZSB0byBgc25kX21peGVyX2VsZW1fbmV4dEBBTFNBXzAu OScKL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9saWIvbGlibWVkaWFzdHJlYW1lci5zbzogdW5kZWZpbmVkIHJlZmVyZW5j ZSB0byBgc25kX21peGVyX3NlbGVtX3NldF9jYXB0dXJlX3ZvbHVtZV9hbGxAQUxTQV8wLjknCi91 c3IvbG9jYWwvbGliL2xpYm1lZGlhc3RyZWFtZXIuc286IHVuZGVmaW5lZCByZWZlcmVuY2UgdG8g YHNuZF9wY21fc3RhdGVAQUxTQV8wLjknCi91c3IvbG9jYWwvbGliL2xpYm1lZGlhc3RyZWFtZXIu c286IHVuZGVmaW5lZCByZWZlcmVuY2UgdG8gYHNuZF9wY21fb3BlbkBBTFNBXzAuOScKL3Vzci9s b2NhbC9saWIvbGlibWVkaWFzdHJlYW1lci5zbzogdW5kZWZpbmVkIHJlZmVyZW5jZSB0byBgc25k X3BjbV9zdGFydEBBTFNBXzAuOScKL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9saWIvbGlibWVkaWFzdHJlYW1lci5zbzog dW5kZWZpbmVkIHJlZmVyZW5jZSB0byBgc25kX21peGVyX3NlbGVtX3NldF9wbGF5YmFja192b2x1 bWVfYWxsQEFMU0FfMC45JwovdXNyL2xvY2FsL2xpYi9saWJtZWRpYXN0cmVhbWVyLnNvOiB1bmRl ZmluZWQgcmVmZXJlbmNlIHRvIGBzbmRfbWl4ZXJfYXR0YWNoQEFMU0FfMC45JwovdXNyL2xvY2Fs L2xpYi9saWJtZWRpYXN0cmVhbWVyLnNvOiB1bmRlZmluZWQgcmVmZXJlbmNlIHRvIGBzbmRfcGNt X3N3X3BhcmFtc19zZXRfc3RhcnRfdGhyZXNob2xkQEFMU0FfMC45JwovdXNyL2xvY2FsL2xpYi9s aWJtZWRpYXN0cmVhbWVyLnNvOiB1bmRlZmluZWQgcmVmZXJlbmNlIHRvIGBzbmRfY2FyZF9nZXRf bmFtZUBBTFNBXzAuOScKL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9saWIvbGlibWVkaWFzdHJlYW1lci5zbzogdW5kZWZp bmVkIHJlZmVyZW5jZSB0byBgc25kX21peGVyX3NlbGVtX2dldF9jYXB0dXJlX3ZvbHVtZV9yYW5n ZUBBTFNBXzAuOScKL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9saWIvbGlibWVkaWFzdHJlYW1lci5zbzogdW5kZWZpbmVk IHJlZmVyZW5jZSB0byBgc25kX21peGVyX3NlbGVtX3NldF9wbGF5YmFja19zd2l0Y2hfYWxsQEFM U0FfMC45JwovdXNyL2xvY2FsL2xpYi9saWJtZWRpYXN0cmVhbWVyLnNvOiB1bmRlZmluZWQgcmVm ZXJlbmNlIHRvIGBzbmRfcGNtX3ByZXBhcmVAQUxTQV8wLjknCi91c3IvbG9jYWwvbGliL2xpYm1l ZGlhc3RyZWFtZXIuc286IHVuZGVmaW5lZCByZWZlcmVuY2UgdG8gYHNuZF9taXhlcl9zZWxlbV9n ZXRfcGxheWJhY2tfdm9sdW1lQEFMU0FfMC45JwovdXNyL2xvY2FsL2xpYi9saWJtZWRpYXN0cmVh bWVyLnNvOiB1bmRlZmluZWQgcmVmZXJlbmNlIHRvIGBzbmRfcGNtX2h3X3BhcmFtc19hbnlAQUxT QV8wLjknCi91c3IvbG9jYWwvbGliL2xpYm1lZGlhc3RyZWFtZXIuc286IHVuZGVmaW5lZCByZWZl cmVuY2UgdG8gYHNuZF9wY21fc3dfcGFyYW1zX3NpemVvZkBBTFNBXzAuOScKL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9s aWIvbGlibWVkaWFzdHJlYW1lci5zbzogdW5kZWZpbmVkIHJlZmVyZW5jZSB0byBgc25kX3BjbV9k cmFpbkBBTFNBXzAuOScKL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9saWIvbGlibWVkaWFzdHJlYW1lci5zbzogdW5kZWZp bmVkIHJlZmVyZW5jZSB0byBgc25kX21peGVyX3NlbGVtX2hhc19jYXB0dXJlX3ZvbHVtZUBBTFNB XzAuOScKL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9saWIvbGlibWVkaWFzdHJlYW1lci5zbzogdW5kZWZpbmVkIHJlZmVy ZW5jZSB0byBgc25kX3BjbV9hdmFpbF91cGRhdGVAQUxTQV8wLjknCi91c3IvbG9jYWwvbGliL2xp Ym1lZGlhc3RyZWFtZXIuc286IHVuZGVmaW5lZCByZWZlcmVuY2UgdG8gYHNuZF9wY21fY2xvc2VA QUxTQV8wLjknCi91c3IvbG9jYWwvbGliL2xpYm1lZGlhc3RyZWFtZXIuc286IHVuZGVmaW5lZCBy ZWZlcmVuY2UgdG8gYHNuZF9wY21faHdfcGFyYW1zX3NldF9wZXJpb2Rfc2l6ZV9uZWFyQEFMU0Ff MC45LjByYzQnCi91c3IvbG9jYWwvbGliL2xpYm1lZGlhc3RyZWFtZXIuc286IHVuZGVmaW5lZCBy ZWZlcmVuY2UgdG8gYHNuZF9taXhlcl9vcGVuQEFMU0FfMC45JwovdXNyL2xvY2FsL2xpYi9saWJt ZWRpYXN0cmVhbWVyLnNvOiB1bmRlZmluZWQgcmVmZXJlbmNlIHRvIGBzbmRfbWl4ZXJfc2VsZW1f cmVnaXN0ZXJAQUxTQV8wLjknCi91c3IvbG9jYWwvbGliL2xpYm1lZGlhc3RyZWFtZXIuc286IHVu ZGVmaW5lZCByZWZlcmVuY2UgdG8gYHNuZF9taXhlcl9zZWxlbV9oYXNfcGxheWJhY2tfc3dpdGNo QEFMU0FfMC45JwovdXNyL2xvY2FsL2xpYi9saWJtZWRpYXN0cmVhbWVyLnNvOiB1bmRlZmluZWQg cmVmZXJlbmNlIHRvIGBzbmRfcGNtX2h3X3BhcmFtc19zZXRfY2hhbm5lbHNAQUxTQV8wLjknCi91 c3IvbG9jYWwvbGliL2xpYm1lZGlhc3RyZWFtZXIuc286IHVuZGVmaW5lZCByZWZlcmVuY2UgdG8g YHNuZF9wY21faHdfcGFyYW1zX3NldF9hY2Nlc3NAQUxTQV8wLjknCi91c3IvbG9jYWwvbGliL2xp Ym1lZGlhc3RyZWFtZXIuc286IHVuZGVmaW5lZCByZWZlcmVuY2UgdG8gYHNuZF9wY21faHdfcGFy YW1zX3NldF9yYXRlX25lYXJAQUxTQV8wLjkuMHJjNCcKKioqIFtrb3BldGUvcHJvdG9jb2xzL2ph YmJlci9nb29nbGV0YWxrL2xpYmppbmdsZS90YWxrL2V4YW1wbGVzL2NhbGwvZ29vZ2xldGFsay1j YWxsXSBFcnJvciBjb2RlIDEKClN0b3AgaW4gL3Vzci9wb3J0cy9uZXQva2RlbmV0d29yazQvd29y ay9rZGVuZXR3b3JrLTQuOC40L2J1aWxkLgoqKiogW2tvcGV0ZS9wcm90b2NvbHMvamFiYmVyL2dv b2dsZXRhbGsvbGliamluZ2xlL3RhbGsvZXhhbXBsZXMvY2FsbC9DTWFrZUZpbGVzL2NhbGwuZGly L2FsbF0gRXJyb3IgY29kZSAxCgpTdG9wIGluIC91c3IvcG9ydHMvbmV0L2tkZW5ldHdvcms0L3dv cmsva2RlbmV0d29yay00LjguNC9idWlsZC4KKioqIFthbGxdIEVycm9yIGNvZGUgMQoKU3RvcCBp biAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL25ldC9rZGVuZXR3b3JrNC93b3JrL2tkZW5ldHdvcmstNC44LjQvYnVpbGQu CioqKiBbZG8tYnVpbGRdIEVycm9yIGNvZGUgMQoKU3RvcCBpbiAvdXNyL3BvcnRzL25ldC9rZGVu ZXR3b3JrNC4KKioqIFtidWlsZF0gRXJyb3IgY29kZSAxCgpTdG9wIGluIC91c3IvcG9ydHMvbmV0 L2tkZW5ldHdvcms0Lgo= --0015175df1faca0f4904c2994eaa-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 16:27:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA341065686 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:27:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562E48FC08 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sfvq9-0008Ru-MJ for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:27:09 +0200 Received: from static-78-8-147-77.ssp.dialog.net.pl ([78.8.147.77]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:27:09 +0200 Received: from mwisnicki+freebsd by static-78-8-147-77.ssp.dialog.net.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:27:09 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Marcin Wisnicki Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 9 Message-ID: References: <4FD38E68.2090909@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: static-78-8-147-77.ssp.dialog.net.pl User-Agent: Pan/0.134 (Wait for Me; Unknown) Subject: Re: How to uninstall pkgng X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:27:15 -0000 On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 19:56:56 +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote: > On 6/9/2012 7:46 PM, Marcin Wisnicki wrote: >> I've made a mistake of installing pkgng on 9.0-amd64 but since there is >> no up-to-date repository I want to remove it. > Have you looked at http://pkgbeta.freebsd.org/freebsd-9-amd64/latest/ ? >> Yes, it was 3 weeks behind -i386 at the time. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 16:35:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6830106564A for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:35:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93A08FC12; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5GGZSPu038916; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:35:28 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5GGZSUM038913; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:35:28 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:35:25 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Marcin Wisnicki Message-ID: <20120616163525.GO98264@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <4FD38E68.2090909@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jx/LfW4V5TfZLeq7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: How to uninstall pkgng X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:35:28 -0000 --jx/LfW4V5TfZLeq7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 04:26:59PM +0000, Marcin Wisnicki wrote: > On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 19:56:56 +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote: >=20 > > On 6/9/2012 7:46 PM, Marcin Wisnicki wrote: > >> I've made a mistake of installing pkgng on 9.0-amd64 but since there is > >> no up-to-date repository I want to remove it. > > Have you looked at http://pkgbeta.freebsd.org/freebsd-9-amd64/latest/ ? > >> >=20 > Yes, it was 3 weeks behind -i386 at the time. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" It is now up to date --jx/LfW4V5TfZLeq7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/ctc0ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExPrQCePrpZ10k4JiqRr5f8K+votTl1 5rUAmwVWdlJ6AO7KB26W5Q/CL6WFXZrT =6gDW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jx/LfW4V5TfZLeq7-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 18:22:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF91106564A for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:22:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6995F8FC08 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:22:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sfxdq-0006S0-FQ for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:22:34 +0200 Received: from 201.82.202.92 ([201.82.202.92]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:22:34 +0200 Received: from rakuco by 201.82.202.92 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:22:34 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Raphael Kubo da Costa Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:22:20 -0300 Lines: 15 Message-ID: <87ehpfyv4z.fsf@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FDC93B6.10208@acsalaska.net> <87y5nnz475.fsf@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 201.82.202.92 User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.0.93 (berkeley-unix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:f1zFMnG1EPPuUqQ4OyJdD7kodrU= Subject: Re: kde 4.8.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:22:36 -0000 "Edwin L. Culp W." writes: > It broke at : > > 73%] Building CXX object > kopete/protocols/jabber/googletalk/libjingle/talk/examples/call/CMakeFiles/call.dir/console.o^Jcd > /usr/ports/net/kdenetwork4/ > > /usr/local/lib/libmediastreamer.so: undefined reference to > `snd_pcm_hw_params@ALSA_0.9' > > I have attached a file with this begining to the end. Hopefully this will > make it easier. Did you have the alsa ports installed when you built mediastreamer and remove them later or something like that? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 19:11:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4AE6106566B for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 19:11:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.139.233.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 251D38FC08 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 19:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cde1100.uni.vrs [192.168.0.100]) (Authenticated sender: ohauer) by p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75C2820871 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:11:35 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FDCDA68.9010807@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:11:36 +0200 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> <4FDC9488.2010509@FreeBSD.org> <20120616145341.GK98264@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FDCAB02.2040701@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4FDCAB02.2040701@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 19:11:46 -0000 On 2012-06-16 17:49, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 16/06/2012 15:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> What could be added is a UNIQUENAMESUFFIX to be able to have a finer grain name. > > That's certainly possible, but I was thinking about your plans to create > sub-packages. As I understand it, you'll be building and installing > each port into a staging area, and then creating a number of different > packages from what's in the staging area. > > So for a port foo, you might create: > > foo-0.99 --- the foo application and libfoo.so.0 shared > library > foo-docs-0.99 --- documentation > foo-examples-0.99 --- example configurations etc. > foo-devlibs-0.99 --- *.h headers, libfoo.a static lib, profiling > libs and other things useful for developers. > > > and so forth. So these are distinct packages all from one port with its > own UNIQUENAME and hence all using that port's OPTIONS settings, and all > built in one block. > > Having UNIQUENAMESUFFIX for docs, examples, devlibs etc. would imply all > of those are entirely separate ports, like the way bacula and > bacula-docs are handled at the moment. > This looks like most RPM packages are build but with one major difference With one RPM spec file you can build foo, foo-docs, foo-devlibs and foo-examples in one build and get 4 rpm's in one run. With the ports infrastructure we have to run several builds one for foo, one for foo-devlibs and maybe one for foo-docs if docs are generated. Here we can take bacula, pgsql or mysql as example. To build the server and the client the build is done twice and only different files are taken to crate the package. Unless the ports infrastructure can build several packages from one port in one run this looks for me very impractical and time consuming. Also DEPENDENCY handling can become a real mess if a port needs foo, foo-devlibs , bar, bar-devlibs ... to build. Even this writeup looks critical I think I like the idea to split the packages if pkg has also the ability to search for packages like 'yum search' or apt .. I always smiled if I read Linux $fillInDistro has x thousands packages and if you look seriously divide the amount by 3 or 4 to get a real number. I suspect FreeBSD will be hit easily 50.000 packages with this split. How much additional time will take to do a full portstree build ?? > I can see there will need to be some sort of SUBPACKAGESUFFIXES variable > and associated gubbins in the ports makefiles, to do that, > plus something like tagging the entries in pkg-plist to identify which > sub-package they should belong to. > > Trying to mix that with UNIQUENAMESUFFIXes would get pretty complicated. > Not to mention the question of foo-devel -- is that the devel > sub-package of the foo port, or a separate foo-devel port?[*] > [*] Hmmm... maybe sub-packages suffixes should use a different > separator: foo-0.99, foo--docs-0.99, foo--examples-0.99 > foo--devlibs-0.99 (?) > Looks silly but you have more then the '-' (_ + %) for example foo+docs, foo__docs, foo%docs -- Regards, olli From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 20:36:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126D6106564A for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:36:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65DFC8FC1B for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:36:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5GKaRTJ042816 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:36:27 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q5GKaRTJ042816 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1339878987; bh=hsesg+HY+lYE0EyYdkDwYdbzKkdOipOr7JuXNKUtC5U=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:Content-Type: Message-ID:Mime-Version; b=l68wakXZX3HfJ6L/c0x1xfcmLMzVhQVxuYjQKSd8SZrFqaG6RGEsKzsaXSQs8+EKt +P/x+UFuUGHG8TD/AGtPUrq4xbBGu2O/N0YhhawW+9H7tCBDrseURWr8BNKcadqEKx I7SyvAqaxdgBx8RMiQZH7AnbirqyPW1yUK0tb+tM= Message-ID: <4FDCEE4A.3020908@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:36:26 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> <4FDC9488.2010509@FreeBSD.org> <20120616145341.GK98264@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FDCAB02.2040701@FreeBSD.org> <4FDCDA68.9010807@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4FDCDA68.9010807@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC51CB3EA81737B869701CA2B" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_ALL,DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:36:32 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC51CB3EA81737B869701CA2B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 16/06/2012 20:11, Olli Hauer wrote: > With one RPM spec file you can build foo, foo-docs, foo-devlibs and > foo-examples in one build and get 4 rpm's in one run. >=20 > With the ports infrastructure we have to run several builds > one for foo, one for foo-devlibs and maybe one for foo-docs if docs ar= e > generated. Exactly -- that's precisely the functionality that sub-packages is going to introduce for the ports. You do one build stage, and can then split up the results into several different packages. One port, several pkgs. This will require the use of a staging directory, so you can package up a port without having to have it installed. Staging is another new feature currently on the drawing board. > Also DEPENDENCY handling can become a real mess if a port needs > foo, foo-devlibs , bar, bar-devlibs ... to build. Well, maybe. For an end-user system where you install from pkgs (in this case, meaning pkgng -- that's the driver for most of these new features ) you only really need the base 'foo-0.99' package: dependencies will be pretty much equivalent to what there is now. Optionall you'll probably want foo--docs and foo--examples too, but you don't have to have them if installing a really stripped down system. There will probably be some sort of global setting to say automatically install docs and/or examples when you install the primary port. When you're doing pkg building, then yes, you'ld need to install a bunch more pkgs -- they'd be BUILD_DEPENDS rather than RUN_DEPENDS -- but the ports infrastructure should take care of that. Using a package builder like poudriere to maintain your own pkg repo should become standard procedure for supporting any reasonably sized installation, and that will gloss over all the boring detail of that for you. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigC51CB3EA81737B869701CA2B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/c7ksACgkQ8Mjk52CukIy0qgCdGqqXqsCAUAMetK7KmAHKswPf uesAoIEEwBh/7OLpDeoLXZuzfD2EJnoX =38xL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC51CB3EA81737B869701CA2B-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 20:53:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from chateau.d.if (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A558106564A; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:53:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ashish@freebsd.org) Received: from chateau.d.if (chateau.d.if [IPv6:::1]) by chateau.d.if (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD8D5B021; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 02:17:47 +0530 (IST) From: ashish@FreeBSD.org (Ashish SHUKLA) To: rotkap@gmx.de Organization: The FreeBSD Project References: X-Face: )vGQ9yK7Y$Flebu1C>(B\gYBm)[$zfKM+p&TT[[JWl6:]S>cc$%-z7-`46Zf0B*syL.C]oCq[upTG~zuS0.$"_%)|Q@$hA=9{3l{%u^h3jJ^Zl; t7 X-Uptime: 2:15AM up 13 mins, 2 users, load averages: 0.04, 0.10, 0.12 X-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~ashish/ X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3/amd64 X-OpenPGP-Fingerprint: F682 CDCC 39DC 0FEA E116 20B6 C746 CFA9 E74F A4B0 X-Attribution: =?utf-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3?= Organisation: The FreeBSD Project X-Hashcash: 1:20:120616:rotkap@gmx.de::fkWjjTIZQOeYhsv6:00005+eB X-Hashcash: 1:20:120616:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org::9u8N8aLiB17N5t6a:0000000000000000000000000000000000007T1m Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 02:17:43 +0530 In-Reply-To: (Heino Tiedemann's message of "Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:36:19 +0200") Message-ID: <861ulf0ys0.fsf@chateau.d.if> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJ1BMVEWpqal/f39tbW1jY2Md HR2goKCenp6UlJROTk7////9/f35+fnT09ORJdieAAACVklEQVQ4jXXUP2vbQBQA8AvUTkgz5OzY Z0iGWhpS6BSrkECn0mvx0MEJ6AjtYrfoBCVDlD8naJYmNlRfwZq8+mkKlIZaGpJSYmP7Q/XkJDrJ Td8i/H68u3vHPaPufwLdf32AMA4A6GcAgvAamY1pOJiDIFqicTwLswDhfr3uxfFtkAY/GFHPMwzD 8zpnACmIOnE6js7rQb+v4NJrG9od0C+QgpHMy5jBewV+UDSMWiw1Y4fWfyV7+NGFzDsYa3pth9LJ Q4XvXxFHcJRvHOmygn5NAEabnDcQQguarnfoiwSCJ99jmKKcphsZONmWsDK9Ro7cvZOCtQdg8nje egLhc2LNlkLmsezzTFUUy5w18ocox/f0LaLgJy0zO75zk+9pp85GAj36xjqhdI0y3tq2m4dqqcWX zQWBTz8L1irvolXV4J+3q7eCDgVnttjNq6X8H+9KOZsuNk1uCzx8pSp+E9HImfJOTLdcGqo+YKnG EIovizkEn48V7BO+ch2DXcD4ENSpWiU+q8hjjbgTBZCXnZtyj0Ws4Q1Q0B2WXFtYZo65Bbyeeldw RS6qFueM80LlLA29YlVwGRYvFD+kwI/0O+A2PlpOP9GwslUVciHuYGechuBTp922YiDZCrghTknm XSyOM+D3aoRZlo0Jb42zY7DN4p2x4AeZ+QAYutx1sHwTHzMT5cMNduQ9yW3GczN4KZ86kb0c9O8T yXDeFqpl2fryPEAYGXIlezAPXYh2NgVr/gvdoHIuDwuPwOhcWE8f8mmICq41eATkn8x0kuRTIKcB wE9+/QUtiiAnYcaN7wAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Emacs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:53:09 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Heino Tiedemann writes: > Hi, > emacs 24 final is out=20 > There isn't an emacs 24 final in editors/emacs neither in > editors/emacs-devel > is there someone working on that? Hi Heino, I'm the maintainer of editos/emacs*, and I'm working on it. It'll take a bit of time, because it'll require an -exp run (for changes to bsd.emacs.mk). HTH =2D-=20 Ashish SHUKLA | GPG: F682 CDCC 39DC 0FEA E116 20B6 C746 CFA9 E74F A4B0 freebsd.org!ashish | http://people.freebsd.org/~ashish/ Sent from my Emacs --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJP3PDzAAoJEMdGz6nnT6Sw2DQP/RL9b1G593mM9H3ezJbqfSNw OikKuMQuzG5uWP9FlG+BUcLcfNfLaeJhKdHNLyMRVZFe5OznVGaflhTVxy6psqd0 7fiize+uI3QSrasv/PQhwJ4NQWTJ3VzfpXwFEb8mdWk1jbQBRST508u+HD3gttk8 fnLmlqIM9qGH5mWOLoBQQg26fFG0aoPTu92qbAdR2w7nWgqD0r0cHL3h5LGDKpEq iEdJB+Hrd0J0EvZ78vQFomyH5tgKoylp8eX/hBJhnd64WHsf/dEDj9NIdGfc5a4C iYPEIiOdNBDhCe8xjQsQpWiRLxcEwT3r1q6w6i5SZNDLviBiRkr5PVnvAq2108lr gz+cJouZyxAkvG1KHTBNvt7JU+7/KvT2h6xK08TeY7mBhg868kTZ4qAQt8TimD17 3Ac1q90qJ/xjW9W4KqdCMTlvQYMXrwuKEd8rOXtuUbQWc7UNnVzwb+3X+hfyuZr9 DAJTzw46r37rRrUHSRPDStcHZANS/iFLhf53iDqsiwJowXix9lZpdrLx/PNnuuZe Po1G1YiWBBSBXh/H8vke3tPyr2aSOrOCHkNJNlGeeOroZ8awYxc99u+alyg+OqyC 7J42PtwYVfV8SE7KjGUV3+iXadYmXIrqD2RW+/+V617/yj6XSa72cnXTzAqucZiT +TrpIcwc+pXhGVs1O5B9 =H/uZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 21:21:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80998106564A for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.139.233.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3531B8FC16 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cde1100.uni.vrs [192.168.0.100]) (Authenticated sender: ohauer) by p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F64C20829 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 23:21:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FDCF8DE.4070702@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 23:21:34 +0200 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4FD8AFEC.6070605@FreeBSD.org> <4FDC9488.2010509@FreeBSD.org> <20120616145341.GK98264@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FDCAB02.2040701@FreeBSD.org> <4FDCDA68.9010807@FreeBSD.org> <4FDCEE4A.3020908@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4FDCEE4A.3020908@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:21:33 -0000 On 2012-06-16 22:36, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 16/06/2012 20:11, Olli Hauer wrote: >> With one RPM spec file you can build foo, foo-docs, foo-devlibs and >> foo-examples in one build and get 4 rpm's in one run. >> >> With the ports infrastructure we have to run several builds >> one for foo, one for foo-devlibs and maybe one for foo-docs if docs are >> generated. > > Exactly -- that's precisely the functionality that sub-packages is going > to introduce for the ports. You do one build stage, and can then split > up the results into several different packages. One port, several pkgs. sounds good > > This will require the use of a staging directory, so you can package up > a port without having to have it installed. Staging is another new > feature currently on the drawing board. > >> Also DEPENDENCY handling can become a real mess if a port needs >> foo, foo-devlibs , bar, bar-devlibs ... to build. > > Well, maybe. For an end-user system where you install from pkgs (in > this case, meaning pkgng -- that's the driver for most of these new > features ) you only really need the base 'foo-0.99' package: > dependencies will be pretty much equivalent to what there is now. > Optionall you'll probably want foo--docs and foo--examples too, but you > don't have to have them if installing a really stripped down system. > There will probably be some sort of global setting to say automatically > install docs and/or examples when you install the primary port. > > When you're doing pkg building, then yes, you'ld need to install a bunch > more pkgs -- they'd be BUILD_DEPENDS rather than RUN_DEPENDS -- but the > ports infrastructure should take care of that. Using a package builder > like poudriere to maintain your own pkg repo should become standard > procedure for supporting any reasonably sized installation, and that > will gloss over all the boring detail of that for you. > also sounds good to me, at the moment I stopped testing pkgng since I use exclusive tinderbox with several builds for prod machines and haven't had the time to look deeper into the ./tb tbcleanup bug (tb head) which wiped twice a view builds from two different build machines. http://www.marcuscom.com/pipermail/tinderbox-list/2012-May/002601.html -- Regards, olli From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 21:37:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CDF106567F for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:37:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx.tetcu.info (mx.tetcu.info [217.19.15.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FE98FC16 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:37:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (unknown [188.27.101.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.tetcu.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 57259C1A0F; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:37:48 +0300 (EEST) Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:37:47 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: "Waitman Gobble" Message-ID: <20120617003747.273ddbdb@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <1339826563.59482@da3m0n8t3r.com> References: <1339826563.59482@da3m0n8t3r.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Robert Simmons Subject: Re: Skype 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:37:56 -0000 On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 23:02:43 -0700 (PDT) "Waitman Gobble" wrote: > dude like since MS bought it they haven't even released any non-win32 > version. i agree, a different alternative to skype is better, and get > your contacts to join up with that. If you don't count Mac, Android, and some other .. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 16 21:41:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6CA106564A for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:41:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx.tetcu.info (mx.tetcu.info [217.19.15.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B038FC0A for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:41:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (unknown [188.27.101.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.tetcu.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5215BC1AFF; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:41:56 +0300 (EEST) Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:41:55 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Rich Neese Message-ID: <20120617004155.73a59dbc@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <4FDBA4E7.40209@gmail.com> References: <20120615130839.2bbb9d51@scorpio> <4FDBA4E7.40209@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Robert Simmons Subject: Re: Skype 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:41:57 -0000 On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:11:03 -0400 Rich Neese wrote: > On 6/15/2012 5:08 PM, Robert Simmons wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Jerry wrote: > >> Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of > >> getting it ported to FreeBSD? The latest version in ports is only > >> 2.x. > > I don't have time to do it right at the moment, but since this is > > pre-compiled binary software, updating the port yourself and sending > > the patches in with a PR would not be a complex task. I'm confident > > that you could do it. Start here: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/quick-porting.html > > > > The URL for downloading the bugger is here: > > http://download.skype.com/linux/skype_static-4.0.0.7.tar.bz2 > > > > Good luck, and thanks in advance! It also needs to run, which it doesn't for lack of linux emulation things and some linux- ports. > I just wish skype would get off their buts and make a bsd version. time > to break code and make a opensource version 0 chances. As a market we're not significant at all for them. Even Linux isn't, not really. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B