Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 14 Jul 2012 22:21:50 -0500
From:      Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To:        Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>
Cc:        freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org, miwi@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: graphics/libGL regression on sparc64
Message-ID:  <20120715032150.GA24257@lonesome.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120714133313.GA93858@alchemy.franken.de>
References:  <20120619104247.GA13630@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120630121634.GA94551@alchemy.franken.de> <20120709094958.GB52954@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120709130430.GN63893@alchemy.franken.de> <20120714133313.GA93858@alchemy.franken.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 03:33:13PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
> Given that I haven't received any feedback on the above mentioned
> dri_libGL_libdrm.diff so far, I'm going to commit it on June 16th
> unless someone comes up with an objection and given that I can
> get an approval from a ports committer.

You're going to wait a whole 11 months? :-)

In any case, I'm also toying around with arm builds, and of course arm
needs yet another special case added.

Would you object if I wanted to fix that and then test these patches
on an -exp run on amd64?  They're just intrusive enough to make me
nervous about the tier-1 machines.

mcl



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120715032150.GA24257>