From owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 15 03:21:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 729721065672; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 03:21:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A9FA8FC18; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 03:21:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id CBDC25625B; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 22:21:50 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 22:21:50 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Marius Strobl Message-ID: <20120715032150.GA24257@lonesome.com> References: <20120619104247.GA13630@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120630121634.GA94551@alchemy.franken.de> <20120709094958.GB52954@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120709130430.GN63893@alchemy.franken.de> <20120714133313.GA93858@alchemy.franken.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120714133313.GA93858@alchemy.franken.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org, miwi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: graphics/libGL regression on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 03:21:51 -0000 On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 03:33:13PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: > Given that I haven't received any feedback on the above mentioned > dri_libGL_libdrm.diff so far, I'm going to commit it on June 16th > unless someone comes up with an objection and given that I can > get an approval from a ports committer. You're going to wait a whole 11 months? :-) In any case, I'm also toying around with arm builds, and of course arm needs yet another special case added. Would you object if I wanted to fix that and then test these patches on an -exp run on amd64? They're just intrusive enough to make me nervous about the tier-1 machines. mcl