From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 00:42:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D31106564A for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 00:42:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F8F8FC0A for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 00:42:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED19F1DAF3; Sun, 6 May 2012 02:42:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q460gr74003945; Sun, 6 May 2012 02:42:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 02:42:53 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Joshua Isom Message-Id: <20120506024253.0c276fbc.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4FA54566.6050106@gmail.com> References: <4FA54566.6050106@gmail.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Best mail setup for home server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 00:42:55 -0000 On Sat, 05 May 2012 10:21:10 -0500, Joshua Isom wrote: > I currently use my FreeBSD system as my generic unix server and some > coding, along with occasional multimedia. I'd installed postfix years > ago and kept using it. Right now, I use getmail with cron, dspam, and > dovecot to handle my gmail account. I've never set up outgoing mail > which makes changing email clients, or devices, annoying. Currently > postfix is set to use dovecot's deliver command so that dovecot can sort > and handle it. Before I deal with setting postfix to relay the mail, > dealing with firewalls and other possible issues, is there a better > alternative? I'd prefer that local mail "just works" even if I lose > internet, and any email that gets as far as my server will at least > eventually mail. The archlinux wiki seems to suggest ssmtp doesn't work > properly with attachments. Instead it recommends msmtp, which requires > an active internet connection to use. Dragonfly's dma is local only to > the computer and not the LAN. Are the only options configuring sendmail > or configuring postfix? As it has been explained already, "home _server_" in regards of e-mail makes certain assumption on what you _should_ do. Since dynamic IPs have become the main source of spam (and spam the main amount of e-mails transferred), sending from a dynmic IP might fail due to mail servers refusing to talk to your box. Furthermore, "connection might drop" is also a bad idea for a server. If problems in mail transmission occur "on the way", notifications will be addressed to your server, and if it's currently not reachable, a problem for the other mail server arises, maybe even in blacklisting your machine. I've had a comparable solution when I was at university, behind a static IP: directly sending mail was no problem, and for receiving I did use fetchmail. That combination made me fully independent in choice of MUAs (and when paying attention to local storage formats, they all could work on the same mail data). I've been using an external server for actually hosting the mailbox (emptied by POP), so _that_ functionality (receiving messages on my _own_ system) was not in my scope at that time. However, with proper masquerading _any_ MUA could "send to localhost", and even "ls /some/stuff | mail -s stuff bob@example.com" was possible. After moving, I only had dynamic IP, resulting in the observation that my setup didn't work for _some_ targets anymore, as they refused to accept messages from dynamic IPs. So I reconfigured sendmail to just send the messages to my ISP's MX. That mail relay _has_ a static IP. The downside: You won't be able to control the arrival of your messages; only "successfully transmitted to relay" will be in the logs. You can see advantages and disadvantages in this approach: local storage, requirement for "permanent and reversable connection" (proper DNS records highly suggested!) and "being tied" to ISP's MX. Maybe you should rething your operations ideas with the suggestions given on the list. There are some things to consider, but what you're basically planning is possible without much trouble, as long as you pay attention to the protocol. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 05:57:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08749106566C; Sun, 6 May 2012 05:57:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35088FC0A; Sun, 6 May 2012 05:57:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1SQuTG-00024q-17>; Sun, 06 May 2012 07:57:26 +0200 Received: from e178012181.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.12.181] helo=munin.geoinf.fu-berlin.de) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1SQuTF-0003sk-Tj>; Sun, 06 May 2012 07:57:26 +0200 Message-ID: <4FA612C5.70206@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 07:57:25 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." Organization: FU Berlin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120504 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dimitry Andric References: <4FA54D4A.4050703@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4FA5BDDC.4050307@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4FA5BDDC.4050307@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.12.181 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, David Xu Subject: Re: OpenLDAP 2.4.31 on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 broken! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 05:57:27 -0000 On 05/06/12 01:55, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-05-05 17:54, Hartmann, O. wrote: >> Since Friday, I have on all of our FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 boxes >> massive trouble with net/openldap24-server (SASL enabled, so it is >> openldap-sasl-server). >> >> Last time OpenLDAP worked was Thursday last week, when obviously a >> problematic update to the OS was made > > I managed to reproduce the segfault you are seeing in slapd, which is > caused by a problem in libthr.so, introduced in r234947. > > Please apply the attached diff, rebuild lib/libthr and install it, and > then try your slapd tests again. Let us know. :) > > @David, can you please review this diff? It looks like there was a > mistake merging from Perforce, where you also moved the line: > > sc = SC_LOOKUP(wchan); > > to the top of the _sleepq_add() function, just before the call to > _sleepq_lookup(). If this isn't done, sc may be uninitialized when it > is dereferenced later on in the function. > Rebuild lib/libthr, installed. Restarted slapd. slapd(8C) now starts as usual and takes queries. BUT: every client using ldap for authetication is now reporting an error like: login: pam_ldap: ldap_starttls_s: Connect error While login on console with LDAP backed users is working although, login with the very same users on xdm fails (replace login with xdm, the error is always the same). I will rebuild a whole system with the patch and report in again, since I rebuilt only libthr and installed the lib, and rebooted in the first approach. oh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 07:53:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E10106564A; Sun, 6 May 2012 07:53:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286428FC12; Sun, 6 May 2012 07:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1SQwHv-0002g5-3N>; Sun, 06 May 2012 09:53:51 +0200 Received: from e178012181.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.12.181] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1SQwHu-00009o-UJ>; Sun, 06 May 2012 09:53:51 +0200 Message-ID: <4FA62DFF.3040708@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 09:53:35 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120502 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dimitry Andric References: <4FA54D4A.4050703@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4FA5BDDC.4050307@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4FA5BDDC.4050307@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5pre Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigEB72EE0E142994DF86FC6EB7" X-Originating-IP: 85.178.12.181 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, David Xu Subject: Re: OpenLDAP 2.4.31 on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 broken! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 07:53:52 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigEB72EE0E142994DF86FC6EB7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/06/12 01:55, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-05-05 17:54, Hartmann, O. wrote: >> Since Friday, I have on all of our FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 boxes >> massive trouble with net/openldap24-server (SASL enabled, so it is >> openldap-sasl-server). >> >> Last time OpenLDAP worked was Thursday last week, when obviously a >> problematic update to the OS was made >=20 > I managed to reproduce the segfault you are seeing in slapd, which is > caused by a problem in libthr.so, introduced in r234947. >=20 > Please apply the attached diff, rebuild lib/libthr and install it, and > then try your slapd tests again. Let us know. :) >=20 > @David, can you please review this diff? It looks like there was a > mistake merging from Perforce, where you also moved the line: >=20 > sc =3D SC_LOOKUP(wchan); >=20 > to the top of the _sleepq_add() function, just before the call to > _sleepq_lookup(). If this isn't done, sc may be uninitialized when it > is dereferenced later on in the function. GREAT! Everything works perfectly as expected and in its status quo as before the inconvenience. The problems I faced with xdm and others were due to a configuration mistake by myself in etc/ldap.conf, which I introduced while searching for problems. Dimitry, my personal thank you. Seriously. Regards, Oliver Hartmann --------------enigEB72EE0E142994DF86FC6EB7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPpi4FAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8V60IAKc0OdbKiIBS5cmmz826equR yydy/26LnYefddEjQAKyTXOoKLC8MAait+PMlJRoxNOf6eOaqIPrBu/9HVaTja9g 9/M+9PZZJct47ILoew7n3Vm5v/mPArht0KHUR6TmGw/wZKwABHF3my60h8RBr+yG iMG+Al0HAiLWwI9QOTsm/f9aRQvE1ThfTgq9Yg79rw721h2rP/ukuhe+d9tihC7E zJX7/eVAlkdKD8KjAG+N0Ts5mE4fynlxfKuBN0HnLVRKSl3wdQhw+ok7fI0Mh1JY zg42iqJbhR9yazS6pZYmc8AXmrVUIpU/Q28zfuXPDmCaJbeJSsfsQg4y1rBLxL4= =l/+K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigEB72EE0E142994DF86FC6EB7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 09:48:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C719A106564A for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 09:48:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25DD18FC12 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 09:48:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q469mdmc023800 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 6 May 2012 10:48:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q469mdmc023800 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q469mdmc023800; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none Message-ID: <4FA648EF.3060106@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 10:48:31 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDBE35BE560FB82BCB58BE482" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Carmel Subject: Re: problem with dhclient after update to FreeBSD-8.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 09:48:46 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDBE35BE560FB82BCB58BE482 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/05/2012 19:30, Carmel wrote: > I just updated my system to "FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0" from version 8.2. I= > was getting warning messages regarding "webcamd" at boot-up; however, I= > got them fixed (I think) I loaded: cuse4bsd_load=3D"YES" in the > loader.conf file and placed: webcamd_enable=3D"YES" in the rc.conf file= =2E > I had never used it before; however, I am assuming that the 8.3 version= > somehow requires it. What's happening is that 8.3 has introduced more comprehensive support for a wider range of USB devices. It's just picking up on the presence of a webcam now and suggesting software that could manage it. You don't need to enable the webcam at all: the kernel will recognise it as a webcam from its built-in identifying codes, but unless you enable some software to deal with it, it won't be able to do anything. This usually shows up with USB ethernet devices suddenly appearing and cluttering up ifconfig(8) output -- unlike webcams, ethernet interfaces generally do have kernel level support automatically enabled. devd will try and run dhclient on the interface to configure it, which I guess is where your extra dhclent invocation is coming from. It is possible to turn this behaviour off by adding something like: hint.usb.0.disabled=3D1 into /boot/loader.conf but this is using a sledgehammer to crack a nut, as that turns off that usb bus entirely. (Warning: This may well have deleterious effects on your ability to use a keyboard or mouse with the system: use cautiously. Also, change that '0' to the appropriate bus number if you need to) > "dhclient" is listed as starting at the beginning of the log and again > at the end. I never had this happen when using FreeBSD-8.2. I am still > confused as to why "devd" wants to start "webcamd" devd only wants to start webcamd because you've installed the webcamd software including /usr/local/etc/devd/webcamd.conf If you pkg_delete the webcamd stuff and then restart devd, it won't try starting up webcamd any more. > All I guess I really have to get corrected is the "dhclient" thing, > assuming it is a real problem and just not some useless noise. The 'dhclient already running' message is untidy, but harmless. It's the rc system refusing to start a duplicate dhclient process on some interface. As your network interface is via a PCI device, I can't see why devd would think it should try and restart dhclient for it. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enigDBE35BE560FB82BCB58BE482 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+mSPcACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyOhgCfWIHPF6xr315iM/CWUmS/Dh9t 2wMAni/dzD9tpFA15XMmx4E1eDmOujmw =5F+e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDBE35BE560FB82BCB58BE482-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 10:25:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96CFD106566C; Sun, 6 May 2012 10:25:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BDB8FC0A; Sun, 6 May 2012 10:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q46APqGP018814; Sun, 6 May 2012 04:25:52 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q46APq7M018811; Sun, 6 May 2012 04:25:52 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 04:25:52 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Matthew Seaman In-Reply-To: <4FA648EF.3060106@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <4FA648EF.3060106@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 06 May 2012 04:25:52 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Carmel , FreeBSD Subject: Re: problem with dhclient after update to FreeBSD-8.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 10:25:59 -0000 On Sun, 6 May 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 05/05/2012 19:30, Carmel wrote: >> All I guess I really have to get corrected is the "dhclient" thing, >> assuming it is a real problem and just not some useless noise. > > The 'dhclient already running' message is untidy, but harmless. It's > the rc system refusing to start a duplicate dhclient process on some > interface. As your network interface is via a PCI device, I can't see > why devd would think it should try and restart dhclient for it. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165477 may be relevant. It's on 9-stable, I haven't compared with 8.3. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 10:41:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A7C1065672 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 10:41:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6362B8FC08 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 10:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl9 with SMTP id l9so4754041yen.13 for ; Sun, 06 May 2012 03:41:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ski7zBfR9z+yOQ6uX1t1H2FBsrAjR2Qu/0pbpZrNcf4=; b=RPDmLeJdzSudk8n+uoRTb70BpsNrniVp1WcWojXxmIcFtVWzb7QNeU5H5ER5VZ5Qzl jMmahfQjbNdEjW+S/Pu2y6T5LFQq4UIySd2g4zBMmgS1YHor3WVcH074QZc4dvMozlyb JrKshQqEy+/yi4DKRHhdZD3KUQvWQ9/LY6xRg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=ski7zBfR9z+yOQ6uX1t1H2FBsrAjR2Qu/0pbpZrNcf4=; b=Qg0b+p2u5taA9nGTnl3oWCbEbzVKdRzI/SycTEy41etulbmrsIO+rjx0XMrL+0sGc4 SFIDjmb5MTn8jrGDGmWP4CroevKLD8PS5PGRXw9BicOyZz+LwC9nHwzaWQYa8A/DmUyD 4EFw8nA8qPisMNeR6hcHqK4Gdy8pjEq1CdXVlfYHEdczaleLJKcC8tegRbYa/F78KSN+ m+lyy6vJ1dtz5tCVDnob0GodV0hvFdEYzyDk4LBQA0qA7bK7r74UXhFBL8bl1z20LJ3s YJfwzfbUn5tVppu0JfbQ68JtQckZ+psTSGnfJgTVj6nSOuYmjLMJWwXX91HqqCWs1I8R 4Baw== Received: by 10.236.136.198 with SMTP id w46mr14991910yhi.68.1336300871754; Sun, 06 May 2012 03:41:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n14sm22350829anl.11.2012.05.06.03.41.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 06 May 2012 03:41:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3Vlk5c6f2Tz2CG46 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 06:41:08 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 06:41:08 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120506064108.4a770231@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4FA54566.6050106@gmail.com> References: <4FA54566.6050106@gmail.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk2opSmS+pFvCRz1mNrFcrNuxqP1RLHQpOW+TDD0DC5KQLF23xXvjydaRnHqiJzpvg70tCF Subject: Re: Best mail setup for home server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 10:41:17 -0000 On Sat, 05 May 2012 10:21:10 -0500 Joshua Isom articulated: >I currently use my FreeBSD system as my generic unix server and some >coding, along with occasional multimedia. I'd installed postfix years >ago and kept using it. Right now, I use getmail with cron, dspam, and >dovecot to handle my gmail account. I've never set up outgoing mail >which makes changing email clients, or devices, annoying. Currently >postfix is set to use dovecot's deliver command so that dovecot can >sort and handle it. Before I deal with setting postfix to relay the >mail, dealing with firewalls and other possible issues, is there a >better alternative? I'd prefer that local mail "just works" even if I >lose internet, and any email that gets as far as my server will at >least eventually mail. The archlinux wiki seems to suggest ssmtp >doesn't work properly with attachments. Instead it recommends msmtp, >which requires an active internet connection to use. Dragonfly's dma >is local only to the computer and not the LAN. Are the only options >configuring sendmail or configuring postfix? If you only have a "dynamic" IP, you might want to investigate something like: "http://dyn.com/" or a similar service. Attempting to send mail from a dynamic IP will usually result in it being marked as Spam and discarded or just being outright refused by an up-line MTA. Personally, I would stick with Postfix, obviously the latest version. It is far easier to configure than Sendmail and you can actually speak with its author if a problem arises. -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ The Wright Brothers weren't the first to fly. They were just the first not to crash. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 12:09:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006FA106566C for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 12:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s22.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s22.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4F38FC15 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 12:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP29 ([65.55.111.137]) by blu0-omc4-s22.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 6 May 2012 05:09:55 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [76.182.104.150] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([76.182.104.150]) by BLU0-SMTP29.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 6 May 2012 05:09:53 -0700 Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3Vlm400Z57z2CG46 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 08:09:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 08:09:51 -0400 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: References: <4FA648EF.3060106@FreeBSD.org> Followup-To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 May 2012 12:09:53.0268 (UTC) FILETIME=[24DA6340:01CD2B81] Subject: Re: problem with dhclient after update to FreeBSD-8.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 12:09:56 -0000 On Sun, 6 May 2012 04:25:52 -0600 (MDT) Warren Block articulated: >On Sun, 6 May 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 05/05/2012 19:30, Carmel wrote: > >>> All I guess I really have to get corrected is the "dhclient" thing, >>> assuming it is a real problem and just not some useless noise. >> >> The 'dhclient already running' message is untidy, but harmless. It's >> the rc system refusing to start a duplicate dhclient process on some >> interface. As your network interface is via a PCI device, I can't >> see why devd would think it should try and restart dhclient for it. > >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165477 may be relevant. >It's on 9-stable, I haven't compared with 8.3. Warren, I posted an addendum to that PR to indicate that the behavior is also occurring on "8.3" systems as well. Do you think it would be prudent to open a new PR with my info since it concerns FreeBSD-8.3 STABLE and not the "9.0" branch? I was also wondering if anyone other than myself is seeing this phenomenon on the "8.3" version. -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 12:26:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9196C106566C for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 12:26:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s15.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s15.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FEC08FC08 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 12:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP178 ([65.55.111.135]) by blu0-omc4-s15.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 6 May 2012 05:26:46 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [76.182.104.150] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([76.182.104.150]) by BLU0-SMTP178.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 6 May 2012 05:26:45 -0700 Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3VlmRS4Vkvz2CG46 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 08:26:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 08:26:44 -0400 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <4FA648EF.3060106@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FA648EF.3060106@FreeBSD.org> Followup-To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 May 2012 12:26:45.0722 (UTC) FILETIME=[80529BA0:01CD2B83] Subject: Re: problem with dhclient after update to FreeBSD-8.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 12:26:53 -0000 On Sun, 06 May 2012 10:48:31 +0100 Matthew Seaman articulated: >On 05/05/2012 19:30, Carmel wrote: >> I just updated my system to "FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0" from version >> 8.2. I was getting warning messages regarding "webcamd" at boot-up; >> however, I got them fixed (I think) I loaded: cuse4bsd_load="YES" in >> the loader.conf file and placed: webcamd_enable="YES" in the rc.conf >> file. I had never used it before; however, I am assuming that the >> 8.3 version somehow requires it. > >What's happening is that 8.3 has introduced more comprehensive support >for a wider range of USB devices. It's just picking up on the presence >of a webcam now and suggesting software that could manage it. > >You don't need to enable the webcam at all: the kernel will recognise >it as a webcam from its built-in identifying codes, but unless you >enable some software to deal with it, it won't be able to do anything. While that may well be true, it does clutter up the boot-up process with a lot of sinister if only benign looking warning messages. There should be a way to silence them or at least make the warning message less sinister looking. Something like: "webcamd present but not enabled" like is done for other devices. >This usually shows up with USB ethernet devices suddenly appearing and >cluttering up ifconfig(8) output -- unlike webcams, ethernet interfaces >generally do have kernel level support automatically enabled. devd >will try and run dhclient on the interface to configure it, which I >guess is where your extra dhclent invocation is coming from. It is >possible to turn this behaviour off by adding something like: > > hint.usb.0.disabled=1 > >into /boot/loader.conf but this is using a sledgehammer to crack a nut, >as that turns off that usb bus entirely. (Warning: This may well have >deleterious effects on your ability to use a keyboard or mouse with the >system: use cautiously. Also, change that '0' to the appropriate bus >number if you need to) I think I will skip the sledgehammer technique for now. Thanks for the suggestion though. :) >> "dhclient" is listed as starting at the beginning of the log and >> again at the end. I never had this happen when using FreeBSD-8.2. I >> am still confused as to why "devd" wants to start "webcamd" > >devd only wants to start webcamd because you've installed the webcamd >software including /usr/local/etc/devd/webcamd.conf If you pkg_delete >the webcamd stuff and then restart devd, it won't try starting up >webcamd any more. I don't think removing it is really an option: pkg_info -R webcamd-3.5.0.2 Information for webcamd-3.5.0.2: Required by: gstreamer-plugins-all-1.3.0.10.1_12 gstreamer-plugins-v4l2-0.10.30,3 kde-4.7.4_1 kde-workspace-4.7.4_1 kdeartwork-4.7.4_1 kdenetwork-4.7.4_2 kdeplasma-addons-4.7.4_1 kdetoys-4.7.4_1 kdeutils-4.7.4_2 phonon-gstreamer-4.5.1 qt4-4.7.4 qt4-qtconfig-4.7.4 Interestingly enough, I never had "webcamd" initiated in the /etc/rc.conf file and never received a warning message about it having to be initialized until the update to FreeBSD-8.3. I am not sure if this should be considered a BUG or what. It doesn't appear that any of the software that requires it to be installed also require it to be running at boot-up. I don't even know who, if anyone, I should report this behavior to. >> All I guess I really have to get corrected is the "dhclient" thing, >> assuming it is a real problem and just not some useless noise. > >The 'dhclient already running' message is untidy, but harmless. It's >the rc system refusing to start a duplicate dhclient process on some >interface. As your network interface is via a PCI device, I can't see >why devd would think it should try and restart dhclient for it. There does appear to be a PR listed against this behavior as noted in Warren's post on this thread. Thanks for your assistance Matthew. -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 12:41:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FC4106564A for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 12:41:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s10.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s10.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C628FC0C for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 12:41:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP18 ([65.55.111.137]) by blu0-omc4-s10.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 6 May 2012 05:41:30 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [76.182.104.150] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([76.182.104.150]) by BLU0-SMTP18.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 6 May 2012 05:41:29 -0700 Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3VlmmR6gsRz2CG46 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 08:41:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 08:41:27 -0400 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD Followup-To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 May 2012 12:41:29.0462 (UTC) FILETIME=[8F12A160:01CD2B85] Subject: kernel configuration file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 12:41:36 -0000 In the "Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64", if I do not have a floppy drive, is it safe to comment out this entry? # Floppy drives device fdc Are there any other entries that I could eliminate if I do not have a floppy drive? Also, according the the "webcamd" documentation, I need to have this in the loader.conf file. webcamd requires the cuse4bsd(3) kernel module. To load the driver as a module at boot time, place the following line in loader.conf(5): cuse4bsd_load="YES" Is there a way that I can simply compile it into the kernel? Would a: device cuse4bsd # Required by webcamd entry in the kernel file work? I cannot find any documentation on that. -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 13:07:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B8B106566B for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 13:07:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4386F8FC0A for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 13:07:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q46D8Vcb065855 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 6 May 2012 08:08:31 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 08:08:31 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201205061308.q46D8Vcb065855@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: kernel configuration file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 13:07:23 -0000 Carmel wrote; > > In the "Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64", if I do > not have a floppy drive, is it safe to comment out this entry? > > # Floppy drives > device fdc Definitely, "yes". > > Are there any other entries that I could eliminate if I do not have a > floppy drive? device atapifd obviouly. :) > > Also, according the the "webcamd" documentation, I need to have this in > the loader.conf file. > > webcamd requires the cuse4bsd(3) kernel module. To load the driver as a > module at boot time, place the following line in loader.conf(5): > > cuse4bsd_load="YES" > > Is there a way that I can simply compile it into the kernel? Would a: > > device cuse4bsd # Required by webcamd > > entry in the kernel file work? I cannot find any documentation on that. The simplest approach for this is 'try it and find out'. If you use the "traditional" kernel-huild 'Configure/make depend/make' sequence, to rebuild the kernel -only-, its a matter of one minute or so on a _slow_ (486-class) machine. you'll either get a Configure error, a linker error, or it 'just works'. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 13:34:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4C01065687 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 13:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s28.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s28.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD908FC0A for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 13:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP399 ([65.55.111.137]) by blu0-omc4-s28.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 6 May 2012 06:34:15 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [76.182.104.150] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([76.182.104.150]) by BLU0-SMTP399.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 6 May 2012 06:34:13 -0700 Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3VlnxJ5nXmz2CG46 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 09:34:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 09:34:12 -0400 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <201205061308.q46D8Vcb065855@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <201205061308.q46D8Vcb065855@mail.r-bonomi.com> Followup-To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 May 2012 13:34:14.0044 (UTC) FILETIME=[ED4F85C0:01CD2B8C] Subject: Re: kernel configuration file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 13:34:22 -0000 On Sun, 6 May 2012 08:08:31 -0500 (CDT) Robert Bonomi articulated: >Carmel wrote; >> >> In the "Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64", if I do >> not have a floppy drive, is it safe to comment out this entry? >> >> # Floppy drives >> device fdc > >Definitely, "yes". >> >> Are there any other entries that I could eliminate if I do not have a >> floppy drive? > > device atapifd > >obviouly. :) Thanks, I had not noticed that one. >> Also, according the the "webcamd" documentation, I need to have this >> in the loader.conf file. >> >> webcamd requires the cuse4bsd(3) kernel module. To load the driver >> as a module at boot time, place the following line in loader.conf(5): >> >> cuse4bsd_load="YES" >> >> Is there a way that I can simply compile it into the kernel? Would a: >> >> device cuse4bsd # Required by webcamd >> >> entry in the kernel file work? I cannot find any documentation on >> that. > >The simplest approach for this is 'try it and find out'. > >If you use the "traditional" kernel-huild 'Configure/make depend/make' >sequence, to rebuild the kernel -only-, its a matter of one minute or >so on a _slow_ (486-class) machine. > >you'll either get a Configure error, a linker error, or it 'just >works'. OK, now you lost me. I use the following basic sequence: make buildworld make buildkernel KERNCONF=CARMEL make installkernel KERNCONF=CARMEL make installworld I am sorry, but I am not fully comprehending what commands you want me to enter. -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 13:58:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE07106566B for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 13:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95FE8FC0C for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 13:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so3869985vbm.13 for ; Sun, 06 May 2012 06:58:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :x-kmail-markup:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:x-gm-message-state; bh=P1VHkfwW1b8EFU80S4XC22tmPLSj8CSnKCYLl1RLVWA=; b=ZRPI7TZ4mHw+JUd8KMuuP31E7DuDiEPjCSNo/iekHZEpF02nPfZk+iTf7aKXUcD0cd xhlQTTNPYbU/lmE7eDMIJZdkjkbasyncHVoOFQroIJLpIhZrXPJuNijJcmBgiaUyHuFS fIv9zVFe/V5fLJJwXpjaqybBG+MOu82VbqLc800sefR3vwOoT0nJwNOA9+MghjcGf9M6 LL7pOHuaUNAg5dGr4TcMkcBLM9LrUQj3E6iKIVBCWPfAf/fiqhqwH14z4rd05wyc2ly8 38IbM8fzR0CEtm1rEFqZL3lBA2HcwwjUwzDuR0znzUKofYjnyd8px4RaKDL9DF8Gm7Or fRuQ== Received: by 10.220.180.199 with SMTP id bv7mr8027122vcb.7.1336312689085; Sun, 06 May 2012 06:58:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from papi.localnet ([187.113.65.83]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q17sm20789936vdg.20.2012.05.06.06.58.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 06 May 2012 06:58:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Mario Lobo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 10:58:26 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-STABLE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201205061308.q46D8Vcb065855@mail.r-bonomi.com> In-Reply-To: X-KMail-Markup: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201205061058.27020.lobo@bsd.com.br> X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkKQyewVIvv2XMtlS/yyTPKQ+Wnq+MRMTZcdsdyDhB16E054Re+eY54k+rl+14BCXyddiL9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: kernel configuration file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 13:58:10 -0000 On Sunday 06 May 2012 10:34:12 Carmel wrote: > On Sun, 6 May 2012 08:08:31 -0500 (CDT) > > Robert Bonomi articulated: > >Carmel wrote; > > > >> In the "Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/amd64", if I do > >> not have a floppy drive, is it safe to comment out this entry? > >> > >> # Floppy drives > >> device fdc > > > >Definitely, "yes". > > > >> Are there any other entries that I could eliminate if I do not have a > >> floppy drive? > >> > > device atapifd > > > >obviouly. :) > > Thanks, I had not noticed that one. > > >> Also, according the the "webcamd" documentation, I need to have this > >> in the loader.conf file. > >> > >> webcamd requires the cuse4bsd(3) kernel module. To load the driver > >> > >> as a module at boot time, place the following line in loader.conf(5): > >> cuse4bsd_load="YES" > >> > >> Is there a way that I can simply compile it into the kernel? Would a: > >> > >> device cuse4bsd # Required by webcamd > >> > >> entry in the kernel file work? I cannot find any documentation on > >> that. > > > >The simplest approach for this is 'try it and find out'. > > > >If you use the "traditional" kernel-huild 'Configure/make depend/make' > >sequence, to rebuild the kernel -only-, its a matter of one minute or > >so on a _slow_ (486-class) machine. > > > >you'll either get a Configure error, a linker error, or it 'just > >works'. > > OK, now you lost me. I use the following basic sequence: > > make buildworld > make buildkernel KERNCONF=CARMEL > make installkernel KERNCONF=CARMEL > make installworld > > I am sorry, but I am not fully comprehending what commands you want me > to enter. Carmel; You don't need to build the whole world if you only need a kernel rebuild. just edit your kernel file and issue: cd /usr/src make kernel KERNCONF=CARMEL the 2nd line builds AND installs the new kernel. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 13:58:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89AEE1065676 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 13:58:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7ECD8FC1B for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 13:58:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q46DwlON027288 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 6 May 2012 14:58:48 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q46DwlON027288 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q46DwlON027288; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none Message-ID: <4FA6838F.2030108@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 14:58:39 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD References: <201205061308.q46D8Vcb065855@mail.r-bonomi.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig4237F988362D716130C55484" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Carmel Subject: Re: kernel configuration file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 13:58:52 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4237F988362D716130C55484 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06/05/2012 14:34, Carmel wrote: >>> Is there a way that I can simply compile it into the kernel? Would a:= >>> >>> device cuse4bsd # Required by webcamd >>> >>> entry in the kernel file work? I cannot find any documentation on >>> that. cuse4bsd is a third party module. This means that the sources aren't available as part of the base system, so making work as compiled-in code in the kernel will require you to create patches for your kernel source tree. Not impossible, but not trivial either. I don't know if hps@ has any plans to import it into the base system (I doubt it though), but it would only appear a few releases down the line even if he did. > OK, now you lost me. I use the following basic sequence: >=20 > make buildworld > make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DCARMEL > make installkernel KERNCONF=3DCARMEL > make installworld >=20 > I am sorry, but I am not fully comprehending what commands you want me > to enter. If you don't update the system sources, then you can try a new kernel config without rebuilding world all the time. Like so: make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DCARMEL make installkernel KERNCONF=3DCARMEL shutdown -r now Just (re)building the kernel takes a lot less time than rebuilding the entire base system. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig4237F988362D716130C55484 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+mg5cACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyoXgCbByZwKGZ8Pj3GAJHI7V6cdCK8 ty4An36WIJWGh2nChiXPRAifCELmgrkn =NEDF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4237F988362D716130C55484-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 14:10:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1990106566B for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 14:10:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arab@tangerine-army.co.uk) Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CCD8FC17 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 14:10:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from know-smtpout-1.server.virginmedia.net ([62.254.123.1]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20120506141013.PECG10053.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@know-smtpout-1.server.virginmedia.net> for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 15:10:13 +0100 Received: from [94.168.171.147] (helo=Mercury.universe.galaxy.lcl) by know-smtpout-1.server.virginmedia.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1SR29i-000189-2V for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 15:09:46 +0100 Received: from Mercury.universe.galaxy.lcl ([fe80::b0b0:8497:b56e:9ced]) by Mercury.universe.galaxy.lcl ([fe80::b0b0:8497:b56e:9ced%11]) with mapi; Sun, 6 May 2012 15:08:47 +0100 From: Graeme Dargie To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Thread-Topic: Samba acting oddly. Thread-Index: Ac0rjjkWkkxQE/WrRiyeWAoKebsPkQ== Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 14:08:46 +0000 Message-ID: <4C0F7421AA759346AF17299922AD57EBAEB382@Mercury.universe.galaxy.lcl> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=R50lirqlHffDPPkwUlkuVa99MrvKdVWo//yz83qex8g= c=1 sm=0 a=OMdUhd4NiskA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=E9lV9iPmvFwIqWF-6zMA:9 a=u9LwRcq49sIIrBqtmkEA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=bBRVXSeDwcgJH_-pAocA:7 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Samba acting oddly. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 14:10:22 -0000 I have a problem with Samba, well I "think" it is samba as one machine I ha= ve access to when I try to perform an action like create a new folder in my= home folder windows spouts that I need permission and would I like to try = again. I guess some background would be useful at this point, I have 3 FreeBSD mac= hines that were running 8.2 AMD 64, some kind souls on this list were able = to help me get Samba working using Active Directory, I upgraded to 9.0 when= it became available and everything seemed to be fine. I happened to be needing to create a perl script that would allow two users= to chat over a network, so rather than fiddling about with Linux and VM`s = .. I just used two of my FreeBSD machines, this is when I noticed the issue= . Only one machine shows this problem, the others let me happily create / del= ete stuff in the home folder other shares on the problematic machine are fi= ne. The configuration files for all 3 machines is included below, but I just ca= nnot seen to see why 2 work and 1 does as all three are running Samba35-3.5= .6.2 so any help or pointers would be welcome. Regards Graeme Machine Eris - samba works perfectly Smb.conf looks like this [global] workgroup =3D UNIVERSE realm =3D UNIVERSE.GALAXY.LCL netbiosname =3D ERIS interfaces =3D re0 security =3D ads allow trusted domains =3D yes idmap uid =3D 5000-10000 #idmap gid =3D 15000-20000 winbind gid =3D 5000-10000 template homedir =3D /usr/home/%U template shell =3D /bin/csh winbind cache time =3D 3600 winbind nested groups =3D yes winbind use default domain =3D yes winbind separator =3D | winbind enum users =3D yes winbind enum groups =3D yes winbind offline logon =3D yes syslog only =3D Yes socket options =3D SO_RCVBUF=3D131072 SO_SNDBUF=3D131072 TCP_NODELAY use sendfile =3D yes read raw =3D yes use sendfile =3D yes local master =3D no use sendfile =3D yes dns proxy =3D no username map =3D /usr/local/samba/usermap # ACL Support map acl inherit =3D yes #acl group inherit =3D yes acl group control =3D yes # LOGGING log file =3D /var/log/samba/%m log level =3D 1 max log size =3D 1000 syslog =3D 2 ### recycle bin code # bin vfs object =3D recycle recycle:repository =3D .RecycleBin/%U recycle:keeptree =3D Yes recycle:touch =3D Yes recycle:versions =3D Yes recycle:maxsize =3D 0 recycle:exclude =3D *.tmp recycle:exclude_dir =3D /tmp recycle:noversions =3D *.ppt [homes] readonly=3Dno Machine Proteus - samba working a charm ... [global] workgroup =3D UNIVERSE realm =3D UNIVERSE.GALAXY.LCL netbiosname =3D PROTEUS interfaces =3D re0 security =3D ads allow trusted domains =3D yes idmap uid =3D 5000-10000 #idmap gid =3D 15000-20000 winbind gid =3D 5000-10000 template homedir =3D /usr/home/%U template shell =3D /bin/csh winbind cache time =3D 3600 winbind nested groups =3D yes winbind use default domain =3D yes winbind separator =3D | winbind enum users =3D yes winbind enum groups =3D yes winbind offline logon =3D yes syslog only =3D Yes socket options =3D TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=3D65536 SO_SNDBUF=3D65536 use sendfile =3D yes read raw =3D yes use sendfile =3D yes local master =3D no use sendfile =3D yes dns proxy =3D no username map =3D /usr/local/samba/usermap # ACL Support map acl inherit =3D yes #acl group inherit =3D yes acl group control =3D yes # LOGGING log file =3D /var/log/samba/%m log level =3D 1 max log size =3D 1000 syslog =3D 2 [homes] read only =3D No Both of these work with no issues. However Amalthea which is the machine showing the problem, the smb.conf is = the following [global] workgroup =3D UNIVERSE realm =3D UNIVERSE.GALAXY.LCL netbiosname =3D amalthea interfaces =3D nfe0 security =3D ads allow trusted domains =3D yes idmap uid =3D 5000-10000 #idmap gid =3D 15000-20000 winbind gid =3D 5000-10000 template homedir =3D /usr/home/%U template shell =3D /bin/csh winbind cache time =3D 3600 winbind nested groups =3D yes winbind use default domain =3D yes winbind separator =3D | winbind enum users =3D yes winbind enum groups =3D yes winbind offline logon =3D yes syslog only =3D Yes socket options =3D TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=3D65536 SO_SNDBUF=3D65536 use sendfile =3D yes read raw =3D yes use sendfile =3D yes local master =3D no use sendfile =3D yes dns proxy =3D no username map =3D /usr/local/samba/usermap # ACL Support map acl inherit =3D yes #acl group inherit =3D yes acl group control =3D yes # LOGGING log file =3D /var/log/samba/%m log level =3D 1 max log size =3D 1000syslog =3D 2 ### recycle bin code # bin vfs object =3D recycle recycle:repository =3D .RecycleBin/%U recycle:keeptree =3D Yes recycle:touch =3D Yes recycle:versions =3D Yes recycle:maxsize =3D 0 recycle:exclude =3D *.tmp recycle:exclude_dir =3D /tmp recycle:noversions =3D *.ppt [homes] readonly=3Dno From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 14:45:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2979106564A for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 14:45:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s4.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s4.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5174D8FC0A for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 14:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP113 ([65.55.111.135]) by blu0-omc4-s4.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 6 May 2012 07:45:32 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [76.182.104.150] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([76.182.104.150]) by BLU0-SMTP113.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 6 May 2012 07:45:30 -0700 Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3VlqWY2rKkz2CG46 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 10:45:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 10:45:28 -0400 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <4FA6838F.2030108@FreeBSD.org> References: <201205061308.q46D8Vcb065855@mail.r-bonomi.com> <4FA6838F.2030108@FreeBSD.org> Followup-To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 May 2012 14:45:30.0662 (UTC) FILETIME=[E25FA460:01CD2B96] Subject: Re: kernel configuration file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 14:45:37 -0000 On Sun, 06 May 2012 14:58:39 +0100 Matthew Seaman articulated: >cuse4bsd is a third party module. This means that the sources aren't >available as part of the base system, so making work as compiled-in >code in the kernel will require you to create patches for your kernel >source tree. Not impossible, but not trivial either. I don't know if >hps@ has any plans to import it into the base system (I doubt it >though), but it would only appear a few releases down the line even if >he did. Thanks Matthew, that answered my question. It would seem that importing that module in the base system would be a wise idea; however, that decision is not mine to make. -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 16:32:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28523106564A for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 16:32:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F988FC15 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 16:32:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q46GVPtv097220; Mon, 7 May 2012 02:31:26 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 02:31:25 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Chris Hill In-Reply-To: <20120506094858.1349B1065789@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20120507015251.P94518@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20120506094858.1349B1065789@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: mexas@bristol.ac.uk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Robert Bonomi Subject: Re: help debug bwn(4) wireless X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 16:32:12 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 413, Issue 11, Message: 21 On Sat, 5 May 2012 19:26:00 -0400 (EDT) Chris Hill wrote: > On Sat, 5 May 2012, Robert Bonomi wrote: > > > Anton Shterenlikht wrote; > > [snip] > > >> ...I still find the whole networking area perfectly impenetrable. (If > >> you can recommend a really introductory book on the subject, I'd > >> really appreciate it. > > [snip] > > > See also "TCP/IP Network Administration". This is an "O'Reilley > > Associates" book. Virtually *everything* they publish is excellent. > > If they've ever published an even mediocre book, _I_ have never > > encountered it. > > Anton, I'll second that recommendation. 'TCP/IP Network Administration' > by Craig Hunt is an outstanding book; it taught me a lot about > networking, really made the subject comprehensible. The other O'Reilly > book that I found indispensable when getting started was 'Essential > System Administration' by Aeleen Frisch. In fact, why don't I just "me > too" about O'Reilly. Everything of theirs that I have seen has been > excellent. I'll third it Chris. Apart from Tanenbaum's seminal 'Computer Networks' (qv) a decade earlier, I learned most of what I needed to setup mail, DNS, other servers and TCP/IP networking in general from Hunt's book. I also borrowed Frish's excellent book (for about five years :) and found it invaluable for all sorts of sysadmin tasks, including good shell scripting techniques, covering a wide range of unixish OSes. Anton, I'm not sure what the state of the art is for multiple network profiles for such as wireless vs wired, home and work etc, but look around. I recall one called just 'profile' from years ago, and more recently talk of 'failover' setups for wired/wireless nets (probably in net@freebsd.org), but I've no time for hunting tonight. Anyone? cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 18:22:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE1D106567F for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 18:22:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C998FC12 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 18:22:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q46IN8uu067759; Sun, 6 May 2012 13:23:08 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 13:23:08 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201205061823.q46IN8uu067759@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Cc: carmel_ny@hotmail.com Subject: Re: kernel configuration file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 18:22:00 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun May 6 08:36:52 2012 > Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 09:34:12 -0400 > From: Carmel > To: FreeBSD > Subject: Re: kernel configuration file > > On Sun, 6 May 2012 08:08:31 -0500 (CDT) > Robert Bonomi articulated: > > > >If you use the "traditional" kernel-huild 'Configure/make depend/make' > >sequence, to rebuild the kernel -only-, its a matter of one minute or > >so on a _slow_ (486-class) machine. > > > >you'll either get a Configure error, a linker error, or it 'just > >works'. > > OK, now you lost me. I use the following basic sequence: > > make buildworld > make buildkernel KERNCONF=CARMEL > make installkernel KERNCONF=CARMEL > make installworld > > I am sorry, but I am not fully comprehending what commands you want me > to enter. That's the 'modern' way. Note: "make buildkernel" forcibly rebuilds everything, *EVERY* time. Including *every* loadable module, whether or not you actually use it. Which can be *really* painful on slow hardware (like 20+ *hours*, on a 486-class machine). The 'traditional' custom kernel-construction sequence is: cd /sys/{architecture}/conf $EDIT {kernelname}C config {kernelname} cd ../../compile/{kernelname} make depend make Then, 'make install', to install it as the defalt kernel to boot from, or copy it to /boot/kernel/{foo} if you just want to test it by manually selecting it at boot time.. For 'minor' kernel-only changes -- _I_ use custom kernels with =everything= I need 'compiled in', *no* loadable modules, I'm in no mood to wait for all the "never used" modules to be re-built -- The 'traditional' method is _far_ faster. On a 700 mhz PIII, it is circa 90 seconds when I make a simple configuration change -- e.g., add a 'device', change an 'option', change a 'value'. *MOST* of which is the 'make depend' stage. the actual 'make' is under 10 seconds on _that_ hardware. 'make buildkernel' always "works" for every configuration. It does it by being extremely pessimistic about what needs to be re-built. i.e., it =always= assumes everything is out-of-date. This subverts one of the major reasons 'make' exists -- to rebuild only the -minimal- set of things that are affected by a given set of changes. It is 'foolproof', but the skilled kernel builder pays an *incredible* performance penalty for using something that attemptss to outwit the classical 'sufficiently determined fool'. I don't object (well, 'much', that is, see below) to 'make buildkernel', or even to it being promoted in the Handbook as the 'preferred' means of kernel building. It _really_ annoys that it is listed therein as the -only- way. The 'traditional' methodology is fast becoming 'lost art', along with the related knowledge of _how_ the process works, 'make buildkernel' is a "black box", reminiscent of MS Windows 'magic'. When it works, all is fine. when it breaks, you've got essentially no information to work with about 'what went wrong'. With the 'traditional' method, at least all the commands have manpages, that tell you -what- each command does, in a fair amount of detail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 18:43:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C546106566C for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 18:43:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA8D8FC0C for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 18:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49691E6F4; Sun, 6 May 2012 20:43:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q46IhMXR002054; Sun, 6 May 2012 20:43:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 20:43:22 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <20120506204322.304c743d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <201205061823.q46IN8uu067759@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <201205061823.q46IN8uu067759@mail.r-bonomi.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: carmel_ny@hotmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel configuration file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 18:43:30 -0000 On Sun, 6 May 2012 13:23:08 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote: > > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun May 6 08:36:52 2012 > > Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 09:34:12 -0400 > > From: Carmel > > To: FreeBSD > > Subject: Re: kernel configuration file > > > > On Sun, 6 May 2012 08:08:31 -0500 (CDT) > > Robert Bonomi articulated: > > > > > >If you use the "traditional" kernel-huild 'Configure/make depend/make' > > >sequence, to rebuild the kernel -only-, its a matter of one minute or > > >so on a _slow_ (486-class) machine. > > > > > >you'll either get a Configure error, a linker error, or it 'just > > >works'. > > > > OK, now you lost me. I use the following basic sequence: > > > > make buildworld > > make buildkernel KERNCONF=CARMEL > > make installkernel KERNCONF=CARMEL > > make installworld > > > > I am sorry, but I am not fully comprehending what commands you want me > > to enter. > > That's the 'modern' way. The /usr/src/Makefile contains a comment header which explains the purpose of the "make" targets the current way supports. One should read it before starting, because it's quite informative on _that_ way of doing things (e. g. "make kernel" = "make buildkernel installkernel"). > Note: "make buildkernel" forcibly rebuilds everything, *EVERY* time. > Including *every* loadable module, whether or not you actually use it. > Which can be *really* painful on slow hardware (like 20+ *hours*, on a > 486-class machine). Maybe it's worth mentioning /etc/src.conf and /etc/make.conf and the "man src.conf" manpage. That is a comfortable means to avoid building (and therefore also installing) modules one does not need. The approach "to configure all and _only_ the stuff I need in a custom kernel" can be followed this way, and it will even work with the current "make " way. Have no WLAN? So why bother building it? No ISDN? Omit it! For minor kernel changes (e. g. if you want to try some compile-time settings), this approach is really handy as it minimizes the time required. This consideration should _boost_ build+install times on current plentycore multiprocessors with tons of RAM! :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 20:48:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE00B106566C for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 20:48:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from anakin.london.02.net (anakin.london.02.net [87.194.255.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E7A8FC16 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 20:48:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muji2.config (87.194.237.233) by anakin.london.02.net (8.5.140) id 4EEB63D202A90DE5 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 6 May 2012 21:48:20 +0100 Message-ID: <4FA6E393.2000708@onetel.com> Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 21:48:19 +0100 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100924 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120506094858.1349B1065789@hub.freebsd.org> <20120507015251.P94518@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <20120507015251.P94518@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: help debug bwn(4) wireless X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 20:48:27 -0000 On 06/05/2012 17:31, Ian Smith wrote: > Anton, I'm not sure what the state of the art is for multiple network > profiles for such as wireless vs wired, home and work etc, but look > around. I recall one called just 'profile' from years ago, and more > recently talk of 'failover' setups for wired/wireless nets (probably in > net@freebsd.org), but I've no time for hunting tonight. Anyone? Would that be lagg? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-aggregation.html Chris > > cheers, Ian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 6 21:28:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20EA106566C for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 21:28:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DStaal@usa.net) Received: from mail.magehandbook.com (173-8-4-45-WashingtonDC.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.8.4.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943A28FC14 for ; Sun, 6 May 2012 21:28:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (Mac-Pro.magehandbook.com [192.168.1.50]) by mail.magehandbook.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3Vm0SF5DYGz49; Sun, 6 May 2012 17:28:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 17:27:46 -0400 From: Daniel Staal To: Joshua Isom , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4FA54566.6050106@gmail.com> References: <4FA54566.6050106@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: Best mail setup for home server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 21:28:20 -0000 --As of May 5, 2012 10:21:10 AM -0500, Joshua Isom is alleged to have said: > I currently use my FreeBSD system as my generic unix server and some > coding, along with occasional multimedia. I'd installed postfix years > ago and kept using it. Right now, I use getmail with cron, dspam, and > dovecot to handle my gmail account. I've never set up outgoing mail > which makes changing email clients, or devices, annoying. Currently > postfix is set to use dovecot's deliver command so that dovecot can sort > and handle it. Before I deal with setting postfix to relay the mail, > dealing with firewalls and other possible issues, is there a better > alternative? I'd prefer that local mail "just works" even if I lose > internet, and any email that gets as far as my server will at least > eventually mail. --As for the rest, it is mine. I've been using Postfix for a decade to do basically this; no major problems, and it doesn't take much to set up. No reason to go to something else. (Even for speed: I've used it for work on a site handling millions of messages a day...) As has been said, a local resolver will help. The thing to watch for is what mail you'll let it accept: It's moderately easy to set it up as an open relay, which you *don't* want to do. Accept from the local network is fine; I've never needed to set up authenticated sending from outside that, though I keep meaning to when I have some free time... The dynamic IP problem can be a hassle, and lead to weird losses of mail. My solution has just been to call the ISP and get a 'business' line, with a static IP, though forwarding to their mail relay would work as well. Daniel T. Staal --------------------------------------------------------------- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. --------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 08:43:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27798106564A; Mon, 7 May 2012 08:43:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82BB38FC15; Mon, 7 May 2012 08:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhj6 with SMTP id hj6so2642864wib.13 for ; Mon, 07 May 2012 01:43:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=wcw9dfa/gWSU2uRa9yi2Bt2++YwCsGOA33lzNvOMHmc=; b=JO8tS1QmELAPlNI7gqSAUTmS6wy0lB+gxhTmXH5NMT77d0+lqaQLZMw5ibZKVMsBF9 SDqump8NjI01Cgy9lfW84muhwWq1Pv4myKBjUmuBqLbl1rR42njzxJ1HXTfBahhXg++J ZwDvbbt9k2efj+Dl23ZHL7b4wGqw9ONjNomsI7wRFrKP0ELLHvGykGi9D+C9zry6WW5d r/kONnjfLvjC18t80iWya8yNA0o0kXwSR/oVV7ymrNHV7zm6Or3csTilbgWi7/EmF3Tq kJYVqheLSxjT+Bb9rf7eAoF6hBlTEAADDx83ye5W9EcQWcj1C/duinZ+dzlNj1gX5HtS iX3w== Received: by 10.180.89.9 with SMTP id bk9mr32982424wib.11.1336380199668; Mon, 07 May 2012 01:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.dg (41-132-211-220.dsl.mweb.co.za. [41.132.211.220]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n20sm31908473wiw.5.2012.05.07.01.43.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 07 May 2012 01:43:18 -0700 (PDT) From: David Naylor Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:42:32 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-STABLE; KDE/4.7.1; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1976411.pbcBNBJB1J"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201205071042.37810.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.3 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 08:43:26 -0000 --nextPart1976411.pbcBNBJB1J Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.5.3 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. Th= e=20 packages for FreeBSD 10 use the pkgng* [3] format. =20 There are many reports that wine does not work with a clang compiled world (help in fixing this problem is appreciated as it affects quite a few users= ). The patch [4] for nVidia users is now included in the package and is run on installation (if the relevant files are accessible). Please read the installation messages for further information. Regards, David [1] MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.tbz) =3D=20 0592e0b1226314a7061ef5745fa0e59f MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz) =3D=20 002e343a7bcb0cea7456422b75aec8f6 MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd10/wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz) =3D=20 1e7f52dadbd6808d48fa26923ab29f17 [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 [3] http://wiki.freebsd.org/pkgng [4] The patch is located at /usr/local/share/wine/patch-nvidia.sh [*] To install the port first fix the arch tag use the 'fix-arch.sh' script= =20 from mediafire [2] --nextPart1976411.pbcBNBJB1J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk+niv0ACgkQUaaFgP9pFrKZ4gCdEKGsBTdQFc/4L2wivBr9SSX7 qnwAn2N6BwRLRZLDEYhrpjwVnFZ7ulXe =nHO0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1976411.pbcBNBJB1J-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 11:48:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59741106564A; Mon, 7 May 2012 11:48:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vermaden@interia.pl) Received: from smtpo.poczta.interia.pl (smtpo.poczta.interia.pl [217.74.65.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C32F8FC08; Mon, 7 May 2012 11:48:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 13:47:53 +0200 From: vermaden To: "Randal L. Schwartz" X-Mailer: interia.pl/pf09 In-Reply-To: <86d36iycca.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> References: <86ipgbg2p6.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <86d36jzk16.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <867gwrzjwc.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <86397fzjgi.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <86y5p7y478.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <86d36iycca.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=interia.pl; s=biztos; t=1336391273; bh=K70/k8WpehJJZ6DmAZRTkkaPG8cEIqYRKCxb7LyWhwQ=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:References: Message-Id:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=HCLjCGEH4jseiaquJHWquV9J9vJYvDm52agLgY9OrfUlR0iF0FdZHzuFXWL++QS0B sC3Cp8WKSm+ZUVTrVrYFP4qBJictjns5e/GxP2jd4zSDOOjxIqaHXaaR4lc4YAKW9X N0jRdwwGTryUhkkw8XkHmtO29QZKBxPv0+XV4t9U= Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, bryan@shatow.net Subject: Re: HOWTO: FreeBSD ZFS Madness (Boot Environments) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 11:48:01 -0000 > Good to see you've finally been burned. > You'll never make that mistake again. :) I liked that syntax: ASD && { asd } || { bsd } mostly because of syntax highlighting, to be precise highlighting of the second bracket of a pair at editors, nor VIM neither GEANY highlight if/then/elif/else/fi unfortunately, seems that I will have to live with that ;p > OK, I'll give that a try. Thanks for being persistent with me. Did it worked? Regards, vermaden -- ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 13:03:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 142F11065672; Mon, 7 May 2012 13:03:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from gw15.lax01.mailroute.net (lax-gw15.mailroute.net [199.89.0.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DA68FC0A; Mon, 7 May 2012 13:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gw15.lax01.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A41E36368; Mon, 7 May 2012 13:03:22 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from gw15.lax01.mailroute.net ([199.89.0.115]) by localhost (gw15.lax01.mailroute.net.mailroute.net [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10026) with LMTP id TQEIdq212u-e; Mon, 7 May 2012 13:03:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from red.stonehenge.com (red.stonehenge.com [208.79.95.2]) by gw15.lax01.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2ACE363B4; Mon, 7 May 2012 13:03:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: by red.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C39831803; Mon, 7 May 2012 06:03:17 -0700 (PDT) From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: vermaden References: <86ipgbg2p6.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <86d36jzk16.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <867gwrzjwc.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <86397fzjgi.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <86y5p7y478.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <86d36iycca.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.19.6.12; tzolkin = 10 Eb; haab = 15 Uo Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 06:03:17 -0700 In-Reply-To: (vermaden@interia.pl's message of "Mon, 07 May 2012 13:47:53 +0200") Message-ID: <86ehqwb0tm.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, bryan@shatow.net Subject: Re: HOWTO: FreeBSD ZFS Madness (Boot Environments) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 13:03:29 -0000 >>>>> "vermaden" == vermaden writes: >> Good to see you've finally been burned. >> You'll never make that mistake again. :) vermaden> I liked that syntax: vermaden> ASD && { vermaden> asd vermaden> } || { vermaden> bsd vermaden> } vermaden> mostly because of syntax highlighting, to be precise highlighting vermaden> of the second bracket of a pair at editors, nor VIM neither GEANY vermaden> highlight if/then/elif/else/fi unfortunately, seems that I will have vermaden> to live with that ;p Emacs indents it nicely, and colorizes the keywords so that it stands out. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 14:37:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B23106564A; Mon, 7 May 2012 14:37:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D7C8FC12; Mon, 7 May 2012 14:37:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkvi17 with SMTP id i17so5331832bkv.13 for ; Mon, 07 May 2012 07:37:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bF16z2YwJ34Gq3NntaqUkLbCE/WnrdwCxZ4+qP/jMEc=; b=wmPIoDtcYkXRdIhLdl2a7PLeubL1Nbl8Y4IGbXw5Heq46PDYKBTI6ouoBhHcmv6IhD TS/M4CBiQv1ni9CW80qX50CRX/B8HR8+PxS9ZjiMcGXnp+pwSUkmaVJlGnJd8J+oKYsA f1TbGpXmjYfgQSwfpS8/YWuJwvQw008mi8ux7Ta71hPMfmwd1tquR0pzpgikLGk2GxaQ d1WVh+p2UQR2W6JDO6siPYWhgorsaAHZ3zM3aR6HI4walmGfdU32lCK5WZDyIgZfbPF5 NZk1LwxhuUvl9LL6n/mTB88SOXmV3vjGKTs8wuoq8Aibz8KjIDMTmI+ljqmLJgIkhN2W rYmg== Received: by 10.204.9.195 with SMTP id m3mr5917095bkm.78.1336401452085; Mon, 07 May 2012 07:37:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from green.tandem.local (53-31-132-95.pool.ukrtel.net. [95.132.31.53]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s20sm32951820bks.2.2012.05.07.07.37.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 07 May 2012 07:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FA7DE25.7090009@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 17:37:25 +0300 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120426 Firefox/12.0 SeaMonkey/2.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions , FreeBSD-Current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: does anyone care about periodic scripts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 14:37:33 -0000 Hi all. It seems that patches to periodic scripts have hard time coming into the tree. I personally filed http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/165817 and still there's no move despite change is purely cosmetical and just fixes "right way of things". And this is not just one and only case, pr's are numerous and get minimal to no attention at all: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/165956 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/30938 How can I assist with this pr's? Whom should I bug to get some answer about them? -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 16:09:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733AA106564A; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:09:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from ffe8.ukr.net (ffe8.ukr.net [195.214.192.88]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AFA48FC0A; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:09:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=ffe; h=Date:Message-Id:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=DLXXO69XWCKr/Rut/xQwk8gYlr8eKCXfrV5jUV9y858=; b=fr3R8/WT0m0yrtCbQRZV73hSMZwJ9QLgdIkX17FbD68eX0h7rmF9YUDsy+L6rH22ATPGuhGYwsbt45v35wDcaBaecOojPbX5qSaHNDzxkAA0tFNj7BRUEUTXBRZCrSGRBFN1FeK+Tgf5Jqmk0+C/+uZORQP4St+unSHGdAPRnA8=; Received: from mail by ffe8.ukr.net with local ID 1SRQV7-000Dng-DE ; Mon, 07 May 2012 19:09:29 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201205071042.37810.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> References: <201205071042.37810.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> To: "David Naylor" From: "fidaj " X-Mailer: freemail.ukr.net 4.0 X-Originating-Ip: [178.137.138.140] Message-Id: <53012.1336406969.6660815719173128192@ffe8.ukr.net> X-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0 Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 19:09:29 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.3 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 16:09:36 -0000 --- Îðèã³íàëüíå ïîâ³äîìëåííÿ --- ³ä êîãî: "David Naylor" Êîìó: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Äàòà: 7 òðàâíÿ 2012, 11:45:18 Òåìà: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.3 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) > Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.5.3 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. The packages for FreeBSD 10 use the pkgng* [3] format. There are many reports that wine does not work with a clang compiled world (help in fixing this problem is appreciated as it affects quite a few users). The patch [4] for nVidia users is now included in the package and is run on installation (if the relevant files are accessible). Please read the installation messages for further information. Regards, David [1] MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.tbz) = 0592e0b1226314a7061ef5745fa0e59f MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz) = 002e343a7bcb0cea7456422b75aec8f6 MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd10/wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz) = 1e7f52dadbd6808d48fa26923ab29f17 [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64[3] http://wiki.freebsd.org/pkgng[4] The patch is located at /usr/local/share/wine/patch-nvidia.sh [*] To install the port first fix the arch tag use the 'fix-arch.sh' script from mediafire [2] root@nonamehost# pkg_add wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz tar: +CONTENTS: Not found in archive tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors. pkg_add: tar extract of /home/my_src/ports/wine-fbsd64/wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz failed! pkg_add: unable to extract table of contents file from '/home/my_src/ports/wine-fbsd64/wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz' - not a package? md5 wine-1.5.x-freebsd10/wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz MD5 (wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz) = 1e7f52dadbd6808d48fa26923ab29f17 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 16:46:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B4B106566C for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:46:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78DF98FC1A for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werg1 with SMTP id g1so569957wer.13 for ; Mon, 07 May 2012 09:46:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=1T8k9q7Ush24RgOPoQMS01pDSTZ1n80kMUOEO3BOF+I=; b=mWTX3CJ+OzSgH/HKcXj9xaBganYriO2/qx0uXWcVvmcfu8nTe4RMwz0ofbqI0yqjdS wJ9nALbYNZkq9pLJHOcP7LtjwLDNxSxMv/M2j7xr1dCfvxjCWt8BlJSXbsP/qkP4op4o TJ/RYB4fUARbr1XfSfwVuujEs1yOceHU5T+2c= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=1T8k9q7Ush24RgOPoQMS01pDSTZ1n80kMUOEO3BOF+I=; b=nmP/oGbYtidwbYv2tsQY/QoOlQ2sCVEhD1n0lJLScIsW0cPA2QDF+lkR58RrDRVeKh BHaSAZr/oAL/WkmAhBvpt/NDW/owxhhWJfqj1on7hbcZeQkjBav7jTJuXrCbyt+uXppY g5TjfTiC0ilCkDFH+olP4MhvodvPZcV9VhvcpOFhHcYLv5ANPN02gheUlz1Aa4rwCyps /Lx+8VEIgz1/1VxAG2Yf2ILNINZ8GCi7Juk9f6pv6sNsBMT47YqRkQqNNYVy7VPKvHqq CF0JW63HLbeLH8mqMTCOeOMI/UCYoaEUg1jQ260z/5NBHFrwrxzjZnY2tgP7Zv7HZlOU J9Mw== Received: by 10.180.76.232 with SMTP id n8mr15402648wiw.2.1336409211334; Mon, 07 May 2012 09:46:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.120.6 with HTTP; Mon, 7 May 2012 09:46:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FA01728.30504@d2ux.net> References: <4FA01728.30504@d2ux.net> From: Eitan Adler Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 12:46:21 -0400 Message-ID: To: Matthias Petermann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlcHNz7h5gggE6Fy4YFKu39h2dbX9T6J6laGPOpupg+HXRnQyqI+z+nR0FT485Sjyc4wqww Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building kernel outside of /usr/src (with an unprivileged user) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 16:46:54 -0000 On 1 May 2012 13:02, Matthias Petermann wrote: > Hello, > > while trying to build a patched CURRENT src on a STABLE FreeBSD 9 I was > wondering if it would be possible to have the source directory (src) in a > different place from /usr (e.g. in /home/myuser/src) where it can be built > with an unprivileged user and without interference with the STABLE sources > in /usr/src. > > Does anyone have an idea how to achieve this? buildkernel and buildworld function without superuser permission. Just check out the directory in a different and run the typical commands. -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 17:07:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B3E1065670 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 17:07:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB3E8FC08 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 17:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q47H74QF049681; Tue, 8 May 2012 03:07:05 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 03:07:04 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Chris Whitehouse In-Reply-To: <20120507120039.9A2EC10657BC@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20120508024752.G94518@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20120507120039.9A2EC10657BC@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: help debug bwn(4) wireless X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 17:07:47 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 414, Issue 1, Message: 13 On Sun, 06 May 2012 21:48:19 +0100 Chris Whitehouse wrote: > On 06/05/2012 17:31, Ian Smith wrote: > > Anton, I'm not sure what the state of the art is for multiple network > > profiles for such as wireless vs wired, home and work etc, but look > > around. I recall one called just 'profile' from years ago, and more > > recently talk of 'failover' setups for wired/wireless nets (probably in > > net@freebsd.org), but I've no time for hunting tonight. Anyone? > > Would that be lagg? > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-aggregation.html It would indeed, thanks Chris. "Example 32-3. Failover Mode Between Wired and Wireless Interfaces" might almost meet Anton's requirements? cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 18:38:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA65106566B for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 18:38:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul.halliday@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B22A8FC0A for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 18:38:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so934918qcs.13 for ; Mon, 07 May 2012 11:38:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=fX8M1acMh/ewLqZ3yVwyMvL5YlMekHVNhBXCe5PO8KQ=; b=agxBCwNGNKvRMqETwNQcj22Ik5cBkSA3j19kfvFJHl68QIPmWoQptNWt2TSHznnv1L 1xqBsdt1KQSJyptUG397nwUAh7UngCe1TxPGeVIXJfzIf8urGTg9jGbcTmcfIkeTg0/X m1ZxAoR/jM9tO+NQvjxFAQoE6tu9B5CgkqJOdIW1/3R1cOuUSM0OjEvT/zZXPTv/0o2u V4IIb634sosiEWLiJFDUcQcsU/u5UH6bKWwmzMZPfbejokhWO0IeznP4rR7V/pvsFMHs LlUnSWhvGRj8ISlhzCpjM1ke70sqWd4IxXMjomSwZwFeEU2+AIzi/A65kDStdSluL0wJ r60w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.222.68 with SMTP id if4mr1535604vcb.8.1336415883484; Mon, 07 May 2012 11:38:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.201.75 with HTTP; Mon, 7 May 2012 11:38:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 15:38:03 -0300 Message-ID: From: Paul Halliday To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Write only directory. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 18:38:04 -0000 Is it possible to let a user write to a directory but not access the file after they write it? The file is being transferred via scp and after the transfer I don't want them to be able to re-fetch or even get a directory listing. Thanks. -- Paul Halliday http://www.squertproject.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 18:49:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC43106566B for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 18:49:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from gw16.lax01.mailroute.net (lax-gw16.mailroute.net [199.89.0.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1658FC14 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 18:49:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gw16.lax01.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67925BC0FB; Mon, 7 May 2012 18:49:37 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from gw16.lax01.mailroute.net ([199.89.0.116]) by localhost (gw16.lax01.mailroute.net.mailroute.net [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10026) with LMTP id L4kD4scKypPS; Mon, 7 May 2012 18:49:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from red.stonehenge.com (red.stonehenge.com [208.79.95.2]) by gw16.lax01.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002565BC08F; Mon, 7 May 2012 18:49:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: by red.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BAE091D50; Mon, 7 May 2012 11:49:36 -0700 (PDT) From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: Paul Halliday References: x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.19.6.12; tzolkin = 10 Eb; haab = 15 Uo Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 11:49:36 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Paul Halliday's message of "Mon, 7 May 2012 15:38:03 -0300") Message-ID: <86aa1jaksf.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Write only directory. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 18:49:44 -0000 >>>>> "Paul" == Paul Halliday writes: Paul> Is it possible to let a user write to a directory but not access the Paul> file after they write it? Paul> The file is being transferred via scp and after the transfer I don't Paul> want them to be able to re-fetch or even get a directory listing. scp is via ssh. with ssh, they get a complete command line. how are you going to prevent *that*? -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 18:53:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC91106564A for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 18:53:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul.halliday@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f49.google.com (mail-qa0-f49.google.com [209.85.216.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6616F8FC1C for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 18:53:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qabj40 with SMTP id j40so3431563qab.15 for ; Mon, 07 May 2012 11:53:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mp8N/dSAzDQA64kffcDz1VzKb1ZBe3lBYerom3vp/j4=; b=X5Vi+v5QHp7qo4FDPiGKfAzjpXVd2uAHI67O51vsHYsdIs3WumPTHSieNUBUVLMd01 1FYUbZORkwnqV24rjKrKKBYQ2F4L2WXBPMUTROaDPFpB8yXknv0AtPLNgjIEVFrrbd5H eocL6i2GBq8yDls69Z0cX28KY3scESIEGbevDCAKK4fupIigeZYMvOLBAwvwltuXNAeZ O/RXus63WbLCtp+DNwLnz7TTqjQ25YKHt3CrlEuTmmr99ZaDb/kHYCvpfp/HVECpXfPb rm38iCzj2/hkrO7D5fCaeoQlw6I+qLJQ/1J9v4UqB3u/3ftnpyc1CHyttb5fLVf0KsZX n3hg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.154.130 with SMTP id o2mr3224028vcw.57.1336416789738; Mon, 07 May 2012 11:53:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.201.75 with HTTP; Mon, 7 May 2012 11:53:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86aa1jaksf.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> References: <86aa1jaksf.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 15:53:09 -0300 Message-ID: From: Paul Halliday To: "Randal L. Schwartz" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Write only directory. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 18:53:10 -0000 On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: >>>>>> "Paul" =3D=3D Paul Halliday writes: > > Paul> Is it possible to let a user write to a directory but not access th= e > Paul> file after they write it? > > Paul> The file is being transferred via scp and after the transfer I don'= t > Paul> want them to be able to re-fetch or even get a directory listing. > > scp is via ssh. =A0with ssh, they get a complete command line. =A0how are > you going to prevent *that*? The users shell is /bin/false and sshd is setup like: Match User a_user ChrootDirectory %h ForceCommand internal-sftp AllowTcpForwarding no From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 19:04:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4351065672; Mon, 7 May 2012 19:04:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3A48FC0C; Mon, 7 May 2012 19:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhq2 with SMTP id hq2so725548wib.13 for ; Mon, 07 May 2012 12:04:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=4UA2cm5bJ4bQ/8D/cTQdSw3AmW++KHWbq2JKoVKWWD8=; b=mXjFF1vR1H0pSfxfufRvLzgwqfL7O5aZQ6njOAeDN73y0MQJODa89sydnSrdAGUaSt EsGIFgTUkH2ndNd0ysSNj7hdIN0ayFAtQ6Fm3UAxrYLtIqvbmxFUkxMNHe7H6GILhhvT TbACiNxJLdR1M58gPgF2kh3RXSWXZw3eWqiO05hoauWOpj3B1UszEpQ02Umn+Qeb/oqz bQXC1dmiGlJCqj8lZvk4rIaYWccQ0hrSdDeYOqCgPQVjsMTOn/B/D+GE9EFzRWdwQTK0 0hIxBMyTrijqHj7v//RK6V2CPHcerjM32s0AwVL0N8rwXhv1ja4J23NOmzKo2/rpbm/z Y26Q== Received: by 10.180.83.196 with SMTP id s4mr14667819wiy.15.1336417497294; Mon, 07 May 2012 12:04:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.dg (41-132-211-220.dsl.mweb.co.za. [41.132.211.220]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e6sm23592260wix.8.2012.05.07.12.04.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 07 May 2012 12:04:56 -0700 (PDT) From: David Naylor To: "fidaj " Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 21:04:46 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-STABLE; KDE/4.7.1; amd64; ; ) References: <201205071042.37810.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> <53012.1336406969.6660815719173128192@ffe8.ukr.net> In-Reply-To: <53012.1336406969.6660815719173128192@ffe8.ukr.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1401828.McFtUxb8bV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201205072104.50603.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.3 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 19:04:59 -0000 --nextPart1401828.McFtUxb8bV Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday, 7 May 2012 18:09:29 fidaj wrote: > --- =D0=9E=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=B3=D1=96=D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=BD=D0=B5 = =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B2=D1=96=D0=B4=D0=BE=D0=BC=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BD=D1=8F --- > =D0=92=D1=96=D0=B4 =D0=BA=D0=BE=D0=B3=D0=BE: "David Naylor" > =D0=9A=D0=BE=D0=BC=D1=83: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-question= s@freebsd.org > =D0=94=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0: 7 =D1=82=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=BD=D1=8F 2012, 11= :45:18 > =D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BC=D0=B0: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.3 (32bit Wine for 64= bit FreeBSD) > > root@nonamehost# pkg_add wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz > tar: +CONTENTS: Not found in archive > tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors. > pkg_add: tar extract of > /home/my_src/ports/wine-fbsd64/wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz failed! > pkg_add: unable to extract table of contents file from > '/home/my_src/ports/wine-fbsd64/wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz' - not a package? >=20 > md5 >=20 > wine-1.5.x-freebsd10/wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz >=20 > MD5 (wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz) =3D 1e7f52dadbd6808d48fa26923ab29f17 To install wine-fbsd64 on FreeBSD 10 please do: # make -C /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg install clean # sh fix-arch.sh wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz # pkg add wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz fix-arch.sh is available from mediafire. =20 Regards --nextPart1401828.McFtUxb8bV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk+oHNIACgkQUaaFgP9pFrLqHACfbDvoxdx8nhE2ET9sRNQJDSl4 Bs8An3FQvTiHQ8x+VmEBjp8LvN/nZpLw =Etd3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1401828.McFtUxb8bV-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 19:37:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEA11065670; Mon, 7 May 2012 19:37:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from fsm1.ukr.net (fsm1.ukr.net [195.214.192.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA8F8FC08; Mon, 7 May 2012 19:37:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=fsm; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=MX/ACFwGXQR0zvec5WDuGh2S44c0nnu/VprAjTHai2A=; b=giLFkCmzwVmrlRYkJ6T0LIbvHbW3xExP5HrR9mVWvnxL1oaSES3qh++ty18YsjrKnwXM9pOu3i1NVkU9ebO77+x5cncr2wJiWbkU0ByAB0+1dFrBZehWT9t9LNUKYoxphp5Uh3o69ORcuPT68GhzAw5Qn1K1E2DCp1A9p2sD9Sg=; Received: from [178.137.138.140] (helo=nonamehost.) by fsm1.ukr.net with esmtpsa ID 1SRTTx-000Cbd-6A ; Mon, 07 May 2012 22:20:29 +0300 Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 22:20:15 +0300 From: Ivan Klymenko To: David Naylor Message-ID: <20120507222015.0f9a5f5b@nonamehost.> In-Reply-To: <201205072104.50603.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> References: <201205071042.37810.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> <53012.1336406969.6660815719173128192@ffe8.ukr.net> <201205072104.50603.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.3 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 19:37:11 -0000 =D0=92 Mon, 7 May 2012 21:04:46 +0200 David Naylor =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > On Monday, 7 May 2012 18:09:29 fidaj wrote: > > --- =D0=9E=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=B3=D1=96=D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=BD=D0=B5 = =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B2=D1=96=D0=B4=D0=BE=D0=BC=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BD=D1=8F --- > > =D0=92=D1=96=D0=B4 =D0=BA=D0=BE=D0=B3=D0=BE: "David Naylor" > > =D0=9A=D0=BE=D0=BC=D1=83: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-questi= ons@freebsd.org > > =D0=94=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0: 7 =D1=82=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=BD=D1=8F 2012, = 11:45:18 > > =D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BC=D0=B0: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.3 (32bit Wine for = 64bit FreeBSD) > > > > root@nonamehost# pkg_add wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz > > tar: +CONTENTS: Not found in archive > > tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors. > > pkg_add: tar extract of > > /home/my_src/ports/wine-fbsd64/wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz failed! > > pkg_add: unable to extract table of contents file from > > '/home/my_src/ports/wine-fbsd64/wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz' - not a > > package? > >=20 > > md5 > >=20 > > wine-1.5.x-freebsd10/wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz > >=20 > > MD5 (wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz) =3D 1e7f52dadbd6808d48fa26923ab29f17 >=20 > To install wine-fbsd64 on FreeBSD 10 please do: > # make -C /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg install clean > # sh fix-arch.sh wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz > # pkg add wine-fbsd64-1.5.3,1.txz >=20 > fix-arch.sh is available from mediafire. =20 >=20 > Regards Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 20:00:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4BC0106566B for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 20:00:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA2E8FC08 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 20:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q47K1VYf080171; Mon, 7 May 2012 15:01:31 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 15:01:31 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201205072001.q47K1VYf080171@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: bah@bananmonarki.se In-Reply-To: <4FA820A2.8060300@bananmonarki.se> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel configuration file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 20:00:28 -0000 Bernt Hansson wrote: > 2012-05-06 20:23, Robert Bonomi skrev: > > > Including *every* loadable module, whether or not you actually use it. > > That's not really true, at least not for me, and I have not made any > changes to the build environment. The loadable module that I actually > use is bktr.ko, that one among others does not get built. I'd guess that bktr.ko is a 'third-party' module, found in a port, and not part of the base system. I found that every loadable kernel module in the base system is, or at least "was", rebuilt. I haven't used make buildkernel in several years -- I use a 'monolithic' kernel, with everything compiled in, and loadable modules disabled. That way I always know _exactly_ what cabilities exist, and what security holes I _don't_ have to worry about. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 20:34:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E89D106564A for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 20:34:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@fstaals.net) Received: from isp-bos-02.edutel.nl (isp-bos-02.edutel.nl [88.159.1.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D0A8FC08 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 20:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isp-aos-01.edutel.intern (unknown [IPv6:2a01:670:100:11::1:1]) by isp-bos-02.edutel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CD52C62BE; Mon, 7 May 2012 22:18:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by isp-aos-01.edutel.intern (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6364A3DC246; Mon, 7 May 2012 22:18:20 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at isp-aos-01.edutel.intern Received: from isp-aos-01.edutel.intern ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (isp-aos-01.edutel.intern [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TM5PE-sCshxA; Mon, 7 May 2012 22:18:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lacus.fstaals.net (104-208.ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl [88.159.208.104]) by isp-aos-01.edutel.intern (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 38DB53DC24B; Mon, 7 May 2012 22:18:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lacus.fstaals.net (unknown [192.168.10.14]) by filter.fstaals.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 385FD7F4FB3; Mon, 7 May 2012 22:18:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (unknown [92.69.231.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: frank) by lacus.fstaals.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBD007F4086; Mon, 7 May 2012 22:18:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Frank Staals To: Paul Halliday References: <86aa1jaksf.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> User-Mail-Address: frank@fstaals.net Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 22:18:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Paul Halliday's message of "Mon, 7 May 2012 15:53:09 -0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: questions@freebsd.org, "Randal L. Schwartz" Subject: Re: Write only directory. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 20:34:25 -0000 Paul Halliday writes: > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Randal L. Schwartz > wrote: >>>>>>> "Paul" =3D=3D Paul Halliday writes: >> >> Paul> Is it possible to let a user write to a directory but not access t= he >> Paul> file after they write it? >> >> Paul> The file is being transferred via scp and after the transfer I don= 't >> Paul> want them to be able to re-fetch or even get a directory listing. >> >> scp is via ssh. =C2=A0with ssh, they get a complete command line. =C2=A0= how are >> you going to prevent *that*? > > The users shell is /bin/false > > and sshd is setup like: > > Match User a_user > ChrootDirectory %h > ForceCommand internal-sftp > AllowTcpForwarding no There is also shells/scponly for this kind of thing. As for the file permis= sions question: not sure how to tackle that.=20 --=20 - Frank From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 20:34:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4415E1065675 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 20:34:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF918FC1A for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 20:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gamma.lan.locolomo.org (gamma.lan.locolomo.org [192.168.0.33]) by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 654B41C0841 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 22:34:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FA831DB.5020307@locolomo.org> Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 22:34:35 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Write only directory. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 20:34:43 -0000 On 07/05/2012 20:38, Paul Halliday wrote: > Is it possible to let a user write to a directory but not access the > file after they write it? > > The file is being transferred via scp and after the transfer I don't > want them to be able to re-fetch or even get a directory listing. Hi, If user has no shell access I suppose the problem is that the user might be able to overwrite an existing file. The problem is what owner/permissions/flags the files will have after transfer. I don't know if this will work, but check if setting append only flag on a directory might do. I would expect the append only flag on a directory to allow only creating new files, so existing files cannot be overwritten. Other flags might also be required, also check what you can do with ACL and extended attributes. BR, Erik -- M: +34 666 334 818 T: +34 915 211 157 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 20:46:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06B1106566C for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 20:46:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from nk11p00mm-asmtp006.mac.com (nk11p00mm-asmtp006.mac.com [17.158.161.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934218FC0C for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 20:46:14 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (unknown [17.209.4.71]) by nk11p00mm-asmtp006.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01(7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0M3O00KHI48I1S10@nk11p00mm-asmtp006.mac.com> for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 19:45:55 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.6.7580,1.0.260,0.0.0000 definitions=2012-05-07_04:2012-05-07, 2012-05-07, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=4 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1205070242 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 12:45:54 -0700 Message-id: References: To: Paul Halliday X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Write only directory. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 20:46:14 -0000 On May 7, 2012, at 11:38 AM, Paul Halliday wrote: > Is it possible to let a user write to a directory but not access the > file after they write it? > > The file is being transferred via scp and after the transfer I don't > want them to be able to re-fetch or even get a directory listing. A directory with 0300 / 0330 umask permissions will prevent directory listing, but if they know the filename, they can still read from it as a necessary consequence of being able to write to it (think of appending data). It sounds like you are trying to implement the SFTP equivalent of an FTP incoming upload dropbox, so the comments in "man ftpd" might be helpful. However, it might be easier to setup a cronjob every minute which moves any files in the dropbox location to some other place for review and processing, which will prevent read access as well as making directory listings moot. (People offering anonymous FTP incoming tend to do this, even if their ftpd offers support for blocking read access for anonymous users, etc...) Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 20:52:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D3A106566C for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 20:52:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293C58FC0C for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 20:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsd.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.59] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SRUvI-0002Uk-09; Mon, 07 May 2012 21:52:48 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SRUvH-0002hx-2S; Mon, 07 May 2012 21:52:47 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q47KqkoC007780; Mon, 7 May 2012 21:52:46 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q47KqkdW007779; Mon, 7 May 2012 21:52:46 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bris.ac.uk using -f Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 21:52:46 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Ian Smith Message-ID: <20120507205246.GA7772@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Ian Smith , Chris Whitehouse , Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120507120039.9A2EC10657BC@hub.freebsd.org> <20120508024752.G94518@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120508024752.G94518@sola.nimnet.asn.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Chris Whitehouse Subject: Re: help debug bwn(4) wireless X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 20:52:56 -0000 On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 03:07:04AM +1000, Ian Smith wrote: > In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 414, Issue 1, Message: 13 > On Sun, 06 May 2012 21:48:19 +0100 Chris Whitehouse wrote: > > On 06/05/2012 17:31, Ian Smith wrote: > > > Anton, I'm not sure what the state of the art is for multiple network > > > profiles for such as wireless vs wired, home and work etc, but look > > > around. I recall one called just 'profile' from years ago, and more > > > recently talk of 'failover' setups for wired/wireless nets (probably in > > > net@freebsd.org), but I've no time for hunting tonight. Anyone? > > > > Would that be lagg? > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-aggregation.html > > It would indeed, thanks Chris. "Example 32-3. Failover Mode Between > Wired and Wireless Interfaces" might almost meet Anton's requirements? Thanks for all your recommendations, guys. I'll get reading. -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 21:21:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7502F106564A for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 21:21:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32EAF8FC0C for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 21:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6133CBB1; Mon, 7 May 2012 23:21:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q47LL6nW001969; Mon, 7 May 2012 23:21:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 23:21:06 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <20120507232106.975ce099.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <201205072001.q47K1VYf080171@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <4FA820A2.8060300@bananmonarki.se> <201205072001.q47K1VYf080171@mail.r-bonomi.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, bah@bananmonarki.se Subject: Re: kernel configuration file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 21:21:15 -0000 On Mon, 7 May 2012 15:01:31 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi wrote: > > Bernt Hansson wrote: > > 2012-05-06 20:23, Robert Bonomi skrev: > > > > > Including *every* loadable module, whether or not you actually use it. > > > > That's not really true, at least not for me, and I have not made any > > changes to the build environment. The loadable module that I actually > > use is bktr.ko, that one among others does not get built. > > I'd guess that bktr.ko is a 'third-party' module, found in a port, and not > part of the base system. No, it's part of the base system. I've been using bktr _in_ kernel for many years (FreeBSD 5 and 7), but since 8.0, it does not build anymore. However, the module _does_ correctly build. The documentation is in "man 4 bktr". A typical use (with the PAL option, because I don't have "Never The Same Color" here), did work in the past like this: device bktr options BROOKTREE_SYSTEM_DEFAULT=BROOKTREE_PAL options BKTR_USE_PLL options BKTR_GPIO_ACCESS options BKTR_USE_FREEBSD_SMBUS Today, I need to use /boot/loader.conf with those entry bktr_load="YES" Works for my Haupauge WinTV PCI video + tuner card, even the options (PAL) seem to magically work! :-) > I found that every loadable kernel module in the base system is, or at least > "was", rebuilt. That's correct so far. Additionally, all components specified by the kernel configuration file will be rebuilt, which in case of _no_ alteration is the content of GENERIC. As I said, there may be parts that one can safely drop (e. g. WLAN, floppy, ISDN or sound for a server). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 21:57:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1C91065670; Mon, 7 May 2012 21:57:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vermaden@interia.pl) Received: from smtpo.poczta.interia.pl (smtpo.poczta.interia.pl [217.74.65.208]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FAA28FC08; Mon, 7 May 2012 21:57:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 23:57:52 +0200 From: vermaden To: "Randal L. Schwartz" X-Mailer: interia.pl/pf09 In-Reply-To: <86ehqwb0tm.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> References: <86ipgbg2p6.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <86d36jzk16.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <867gwrzjwc.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <86397fzjgi.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <86y5p7y478.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <86d36iycca.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <86ehqwb0tm.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=interia.pl; s=biztos; t=1336427872; bh=bJUG9nepGkMwbHtCHmdnoMdYGI8hjURrYTV5Pto3tD0=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:References: Message-Id:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=tU5rAowv7pbgQf51z/ON58Xzqva0F3iw9yOBWd4RbhicAqfdy3hWFvD5K/C3P6Sux q4WykTAgpAVqveFLHyRaYbMNHWHWFI8FH3fSN3ifsouK8jg4HvU/5Ou0xVS+hgxFmt g29XNxnAAV884hCNzchqnYI4nmBygG/U9Pl8qtbc= Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, bryan@shatow.net Subject: Re: HOWTO: FreeBSD ZFS Madness (Boot Environments) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 21:57:54 -0000 > Emacs indents it nicely, and colorizes the > keywords so that it stands out. Indentification is not a problem, it work both in geany and vim. Probably I haven't made clear what I meant ;) Take a look at this picture: http://ompldr.org/vZG50bQ The brackets in that specific section (asd) are highlighted, other are not, its not possible with if/then/fi, only the keywords are highlighted, but they are highlighted for the whole script so ... ;) With { } I can also (un)fold the section/function, its not possible with if/then/fi. Regards, vermaden --=20 ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 23:40:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24ECB106566C for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 23:40:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-announce@chthonic.com) Received: from www5.pairlite.com (www5.pairlite.com [64.130.10.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F8F8FC0C for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 23:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whisperer.chthonixia.net (cpe-66-65-69-148.nyc.res.rr.com [66.65.69.148]) by www5.pairlite.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D59A2E2D3 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 19:34:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 19:35:33 -0400 From: Joe Altman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120507233533.GA67095@whisperer.chthonixia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Wterm and FreeBSD 9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joe Altman List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 23:40:51 -0000 Greetings... For FreeBSD 8, we see this for wterm: BROKEN= does not compile .if ${OSVERSION} > 900007 BROKEN= fails to build with new utmpx .endif I'd like to confirm that wterm will build and run on 9. I'm currently running 8.3-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p1 #0. Does anyone know? Thanks, and best regards, Joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 01:09:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355D7106564A for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 01:09:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0939E8FC0C for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 01:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so8208006pbb.13 for ; Mon, 07 May 2012 18:09:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+uY8nvZWPx4i3gIyyFeMtfjqm051ZAKLoGgwlFcYThU=; b=TWn38DpjMydVDxe9zyEvUijXyflyA/teofKhQTh7z+xBCtvBjO371q/Ga3rNyD4URV 6K81gz2d+Pwmmpve/bjRvSZktxvdOEqI4HppU1zW/4pG+cfe97jmTjD8YGGdawBMZvg8 dW1mHQyOneWj2MG6zvNrIv7rQ/IYQ2MFxMhZWsrvcZf9W6368nGFuy99pDMJSpTReNCd TxY0p2Oljffb6bIfbtoDIpl1CzBMDrEOdjylcEk9M3IfIKfjQZVqDn/YmS1STZfSeK2R n2ILLUyCDk88O933/ospcieEi0Lwn3bOcMHBnJXPWubDCPR6wT7UDdKFnCxUjeD9drRZ j4Pg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.201.201 with SMTP id kc9mr1962407pbc.70.1336439390454; Mon, 07 May 2012 18:09:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.62.27 with HTTP; Mon, 7 May 2012 18:09:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120507233533.GA67095@whisperer.chthonixia.net> References: <20120507233533.GA67095@whisperer.chthonixia.net> Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 21:09:50 -0400 Message-ID: From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: Joe Altman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wterm and FreeBSD 9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 01:09:51 -0000 On 7 May 2012 19:35, Joe Altman wrote: > Greetings... > > For FreeBSD 8, we see this for wterm: > > BROKEN=3D =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 does not compile > > .if ${OSVERSION} > 900007 > BROKEN=3D =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 fails to build with new utmpx > .endif > > I'd like to confirm that wterm will build and run on 9. I'm currently > running 8.3-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p1 #0. > > Does anyone know? > Dunno, it wants WMaker.h, which "they" aren't shipping any more. Looks like wterm may be obsolete. --=20 -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 10:13:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D56E106566C for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 10:13:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DBF8FC19 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 10:13:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SRhQA-0003RY-S5; Tue, 08 May 2012 11:13:30 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SRhQA-00065e-GF; Tue, 08 May 2012 11:13:30 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q48ADUIG011971; Tue, 8 May 2012 11:13:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q48ADUoG011970; Tue, 8 May 2012 11:13:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bris.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 11:13:30 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Chris Whitehouse Message-ID: <20120508101330.GA11956@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Whitehouse , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120501120654.GA4883@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120501124110.GB5007@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4FA032AE.8050902@onetel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FA032AE.8050902@onetel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: laptop very hot and noisy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 10:13:32 -0000 On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 07:59:58PM +0100, Chris Whitehouse wrote: > On 01/05/2012 13:41, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >So I might need to pull the laptop apart.. > >I'm just not sure I could put it back > >together... > > > >Thanks anyway > > service manual (c02834030.pdf): > http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/CoreRedirect.jsp?redirectReason=DocIndexPDF&prodSeriesId=3368539&targetPage=http%3A%2F%2Fbizsupport1.austin.hp.com%2Fbc%2Fdocs%2Fsupport%2FSupportManual%2Fc02834030%2Fc02834030.pdf > > short url: > http://bit.ly/Ivgs5C > > HP are pretty good about service manuals. I guess I've got to do it, because I just got this: Message from syslogd@mech-aslap239 at May 8 11:05:41 ... mech-aslap239 root: WARNING: system temperature too high, shutting down soon! Many thanks for your help -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 13:49:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE427106566C for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 13:49:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paulbeard@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A978FC12 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 13:49:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so9057732pbb.13 for ; Tue, 08 May 2012 06:49:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=G7GYZ6azj2h0xeBpVw/7m78zzf3bg1DcmoKne3xL2kE=; b=ASSO8DPMDoRaBPqadJgenN9uxoEgwuY8OTTwgsaM8/fl35c71I/jjAzv8ekOHm5P7U dUy2W4tJqBUy/zenCfm3lCePgW/mjnCttkWlHfmnDEBkjQVp+j3/X+Qk9VmmXPvPwYXS FtYnFrzWeQS9uhQBZsWG6DXPiHpSpV+bNTxGLAduhXvhKUztNopOfu00POW5F2fl2nAm FXFHNpY98wvBIBxyV6ku9jqXyTUQl6o8vTutXX38IKfqT1Kih04GUe14SX4w+Pc6PwcA Hr+ph8I0HZp56soxBkyOxUMEDshVLxSFbyVfhsBJsJ/4AGeakGQoewkjaj+F01Xh6j0F LtXg== Received: by 10.68.129.42 with SMTP id nt10mr8294249pbb.164.1336484946848; Tue, 08 May 2012 06:49:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivoire.paulbeard.org (97-113-31-249.tukw.qwest.net. [97.113.31.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id rf7sm2440003pbc.65.2012.05.08.06.49.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 May 2012 06:49:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul Beard Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F10AC60C-41A5-4928-B591-84027A817B7D"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1 Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 06:49:01 -0700 Message-Id: <898E0B3D-63DD-470C-8F1D-49F478D05C7E@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD-questions Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: securing MySQL: easiest/best ways? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 13:49:07 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_F10AC60C-41A5-4928-B591-84027A817B7D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Monkeying with IPv6, I discovered that globally routable addresses are = what it says on the tin, so hiding behind a network appliance is not = longer viable for me. An nmap scan showed the port 3306 was hanging out = for all to see but I couldn't figure out how to close it off. The = "--skip-networking" argument seems not to work, either in my.cnf or as = an rc argument. The server just fails to start. (For some reason the = socket is hard-coded to live in /tmp, regardless of what's in my.cnf but = I gave up bothering about that.) What I ended up doing was adding=20 mysql_args=3D"--bind-address=3D127.0.0.1" to /etc/rc.conf. This seems to work as netstat and sockstat no longer = show port 3306 listening and database connections are happening.=20 Is this the preferred/best way?=20 -- Paul Beard Are you trying to win an argument or solve a problem?=20 --Apple-Mail=_F10AC60C-41A5-4928-B591-84027A817B7D-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 14:06:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06263106566C for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 14:06:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1CD8FC18 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 14:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SRl3F-0002q3-OJ; Tue, 08 May 2012 15:06:05 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SRl3F-0003EE-B3; Tue, 08 May 2012 15:06:05 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q48E65iC012777; Tue, 8 May 2012 15:06:05 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q48E6492012776; Tue, 8 May 2012 15:06:04 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bris.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 15:06:04 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Chris Whitehouse Message-ID: <20120508140604.GA12758@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Whitehouse , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120501120654.GA4883@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120501124110.GB5007@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4FA032AE.8050902@onetel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4FA032AE.8050902@onetel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ACPI temprature settings [WAS: Re: laptop very hot and noisy] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 14:06:07 -0000 On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 07:59:58PM +0100, Chris Whitehouse wrote: > On 01/05/2012 13:41, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >So I might need to pull the laptop apart.. > >I'm just not sure I could put it back > >together... > > > >Thanks anyway > > service manual (c02834030.pdf): > http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/CoreRedirect.jsp?redirectReason=DocIndexPDF&prodSeriesId=3368539&targetPage=http%3A%2F%2Fbizsupport1.austin.hp.com%2Fbc%2Fdocs%2Fsupport%2FSupportManual%2Fc02834030%2Fc02834030.pdf > > short url: > http://bit.ly/Ivgs5C > > HP are pretty good about service manuals. yes, this is partly why I bought an HP laptop. I had previous experience with other HP/Compaq/Digital hardware and manuals - they are generally very good. Anyway, this was easier than I expected. I removed a lot of dust from the fan and the heat sink gills. I also replaced the "thermal material". I rebuilt gcc47 and saw the highest temperature of 75. This is on the southern side, so not too bad. The noise reduced too. Now, I'd just like to understand better the meaning of these console messages: May 8 15:00:08 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC3: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 40.0 May 8 15:00:08 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC2: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 50.0 May 8 15:00:18 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC3: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 40.0 May 8 15:00:18 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC2: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 50.0 May 8 15:00:28 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC3: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 40.0 May 8 15:00:28 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC2: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 50.0 May 8 15:00:38 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC3: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 40.0 May 8 15:00:38 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC2: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 50.0 May 8 15:00:48 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC3: temperature 65.0 >= setpoint 40.0 May 8 15:00:48 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC2: temperature 65.0 >= setpoint 50.0 Where are setpoints defined? What's acpi_tz? What are AC1, AC2, AC3? Which kernel tunables are involved in the switching from one fan speed to another (assuming AC1, AC2, AC3 are related to fan speed in some way)? I had a quick look at ⌡aacpi(4), but none of the above are mentioned. Many thanks for all your help. -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 14:28:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DEB1106566B for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 14:28:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04228FC08 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 14:28:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q48ES8rf001536 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 16:28:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q48ES88Z001533 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 16:28:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 16:28:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 08 May 2012 16:28:08 +0200 (CEST) Subject: maybe not truly freebsd related X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 14:28:18 -0000 by possibly someone can help. I want to use FreeBSD as timeshared server with some amount of X terminal (basically for free with old computers, netboot, running just Xorg -query and xdm on server). There is usable software that have the commonly required uselessness (called desktop environment) and yet works at tolerable speed and uses tolerable amount of resources - i mean gnome2 there are working and available programs for "common" needs like abiword, gnumeric, optionally openoffice, gimp, firefox etc.. etc.. But yet - what graphical mail program can you recommend that have such simple basic functionality of local mail support in Maildir format? Just running thunderbird to connect dovecot(imap) over localhost and having duplicated mail indexes (dovecot and thunderbird) isn't something that make sense. i use pine but people like point&click. if there are none, is there a method to alter password setting in thunderbird using command line tool. just i don't like loggin on over X11 to change password in thunderbird after changing it with passwd. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 14:34:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E4B106564A for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 14:34:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622078FC17 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 14:34:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q48EY9Pc040863 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 15:34:09 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q48EY9Pc040863 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1336487649; bh=XoEufK4CIEWs+BGIFnZSR2P13RTpaXF7/cecVJP2GOk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:Content-Type: Message-ID:Mime-Version; b=h7qPTld+sG7COK4Mvx/SCciF+Gq4+lsN4XbelBPkdcW7L+o/9EsYeS4Vr4u+XxB+5 w223k2KGrfMV6azbvglhpTLBzqgTV1LNE1q6J5+yfJgI4pR6eUSBa8lX3J3ojgGx8d 8LNEDlyvkuqV718LQyGwu2lhDLaNElTSwkfJOQTw= Message-ID: <4FA92EDA.3090809@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 15:34:02 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <898E0B3D-63DD-470C-8F1D-49F478D05C7E@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <898E0B3D-63DD-470C-8F1D-49F478D05C7E@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5668FE4FC45445B6F4D45DE8" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_ALL,DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: securing MySQL: easiest/best ways? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 14:34:14 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5668FE4FC45445B6F4D45DE8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/05/2012 14:49, Paul Beard wrote: > Monkeying with IPv6, I discovered that globally routable addresses > are what it says on the tin, so hiding behind a network appliance is > not longer viable for me. An nmap scan showed the port 3306 was > hanging out for all to see but I couldn't figure out how to close it > off. The "--skip-networking" argument seems not to work, either in > my.cnf or as an rc argument. The server just fails to start. (For > some reason the socket is hard-coded to live in /tmp, regardless of > what's in my.cnf but I gave up bothering about that.) >=20 > What I ended up doing was adding >=20 > mysql_args=3D"--bind-address=3D127.0.0.1" >=20 > to /etc/rc.conf. This seems to work as netstat and sockstat no longer > show port 3306 listening and database connections are happening. >=20 > Is this the preferred/best way? You have been restarting mysql to test changes to my.cnf? You have to do a full restart to get mysql to re-read the config file. If you need to reconfigure without interrupting service, you can set most parameters at runtime using mysql(1). Sounds almost as if the my.cnf you've been editing is not the my.cnf that your mysql instance is using. IIRC there was some talk about moving from the usual BSD-ish /var/db/mysql/my.cnf to /usr/local/etc/my.cnf (no doubt under some insidious influence from Linux= =2E) skip-networking certainly should leave you with just the unix domain socket. Alternatively you can bind mysql's network socket to a specific interface -- so if you bind it to the loopback, it should make it inaccessible from the network. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig5668FE4FC45445B6F4D45DE8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+pLuEACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxjAgCeP+CRzFzRQFzxvl7l+bK1XKqZ IP0AniwzbbHl8Wyly3JwJMFUqDMfksum =4+Mh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5668FE4FC45445B6F4D45DE8-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 14:40:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB82106564A for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 14:40:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EDB8FC12 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 14:40:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q48Eflou090224; Tue, 8 May 2012 09:41:47 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 09:41:47 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201205081441.q48Eflou090224@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl In-Reply-To: Cc: Subject: Re: maybe not truly freebsd related X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 14:40:35 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 8 09:31:02 2012 > Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 16:28:08 +0200 (CEST) > From: Wojciech Puchar > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: maybe not truly freebsd related > > by possibly someone can help. > > I want to use FreeBSD as timeshared server with some amount of X terminal > (basically for free with old computers, netboot, running just Xorg -query > and xdm on server). > > But yet - what graphical mail program can you recommend that have such > simple basic functionality of local mail support in Maildir format? Did you try googling for 'X mail client FreeBSD'? A mere 14+ million hits. add 'maildir' to the search, and you get over 1.6 million . Eliminate referenes to Apple, and there are still over 1.2 million hits. *LOTS* of options for you to investigate. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 15:24:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A59106566C for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 15:24:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922ED8FC15 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 15:24:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q48FO47G001897; Tue, 8 May 2012 17:24:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q48FO43f001894; Tue, 8 May 2012 17:24:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 17:24:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Robert Bonomi In-Reply-To: <201205081441.q48Eflou090224@mail.r-bonomi.com> Message-ID: References: <201205081441.q48Eflou090224@mail.r-bonomi.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 08 May 2012 17:24:04 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: maybe not truly freebsd related X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 15:24:08 -0000 >> But yet - what graphical mail program can you recommend that have such >> simple basic functionality of local mail support in Maildir format? > > Did you try googling for 'X mail client FreeBSD'? A mere 14+ million hits. true. and none usable. all outdated etc. did YOU checked them before answering? > add 'maildir' to the search, and you get over 1.6 million . Eliminate > referenes to Apple, and there are still over 1.2 million hits. > > *LOTS* of options for you to investigate. > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 15:48:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EEF5106564A; Tue, 8 May 2012 15:48:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A13B8FC15; Tue, 8 May 2012 15:48:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so13318437obc.13 for ; Tue, 08 May 2012 08:48:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=b5YzeEsvC9PZxbofRpRi5RF33HWbe1LINO/nsLGjJRI=; b=gFtJFGT3XIy7gRoTSBbszSuITm6/tXhwEc9tREubdc0EIlYlrMt20qASvmoQ0Pug3C 7WKM1yFy45bTJ1NOXEtIxe740bRLuvOKR4vJ4uIE5nXaxQvuyEYrT2CACi3BWg4TiPlU uHSxgQThjZRSpAi44USWiomCOLpixhS5A53RJ0otqG6nMzrAZfK9BBl+DpLoloi7LoBW rQZ6b7V1OlTWxs0xe2fIfkPXbxvbx1PUL3qPf3F/Jmuq/hZdbyALTrAp5kCyhaeiooXq wB8wevw2BWoJvIS2ENaNrher06ANzrtJQiE2X07w+4V3iIav03tqpj8Z5Mg4kR/rUytJ no3g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.113.73 with SMTP id iw9mr3179089obb.21.1336492130696; Tue, 08 May 2012 08:48:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.5.138 with HTTP; Tue, 8 May 2012 08:48:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 16:48:50 +0100 Message-ID: From: krad To: FreeBSD Questions , freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: synproxy definition in pfctl -si X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 15:48:51 -0000 Hi, I am looking to track the number of syn packets coming into a system, as the box in question has pf running and using the synproxy attribute on tcp services, I hope to be able to use the synproxy field in pfctl -si. However I cant find a definitive definition of the variable, Ive looking in the source but haven't have much look in finding where it is derived. Can anyone shed any light on if my assumption is valid as without a proper definition of this variable I can't really trust its output is what i think it is. Alternatively if anyone could suggest an another way of tracking inbound syn packets I would be grateful, it must use base os tools though, ie no ports or other apps required. Thanks K From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 15:57:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D9C106566C for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 15:57:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDEA8FC0A for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 15:57:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q48FxCW5090734; Tue, 8 May 2012 10:59:12 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 10:59:12 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201205081559.q48FxCW5090734@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com, wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: maybe not truly freebsd related X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 15:57:59 -0000 > From: Wojciech Puchar > Subject: Re: maybe not truly freebsd related > > >> But yet - what graphical mail program can you recommend that have such > >> simple basic functionality of local mail support in Maildir format? > > > > Did you try googling for 'X mail client FreeBSD'? A mere 14+ million hits. > > true. and none usable. all outdated etc. did YOU checked them before > answering? Strange. With 'maildir' and '-apple' added, I found several product names I recognized on the first page of items. _I_ don't use a point-and-drool mail client so I can't commennt on any of them, but 'mutt' for example, running in an xterm (or a putty client), *is* mouse aware. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 16:27:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2CA106566B for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 16:27:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@vereshagin.org) Received: from mx1.skyriver.ru (ns1.skyriver.ru [89.108.118.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB928FC0C for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 16:27:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (tor-exit-router37-readme.formlessnetworking.net [199.48.147.37]) by mx1.skyriver.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6855A5AB0 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 20:27:06 +0400 (MSK) Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 20:26:59 +0400 From: Peter Vereshagin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120508162659.GC12053@external.screwed.box> References: <898E0B3D-63DD-470C-8F1D-49F478D05C7E@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <898E0B3D-63DD-470C-8F1D-49F478D05C7E@gmail.com> Organization: ' X-Face: 8T>{1owI$Byj]]a; ^G]kRf*dkq>E-3':F>4ODP[#X4s"dr?^b&2G@'3lukno]A1wvJ_L(~u 6>I2ra/<,j1%@C[LN=>p#_}RIV+#:KTszp-X$bQOj,K Subject: Re: securing MySQL: easiest/best ways? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 16:27:09 -0000 Hello. 2012/05/08 06:49:01 -0700 Paul Beard => To FreeBSD-questions : PB> Monkeying with IPv6, I discovered that globally routable addresses are what it says on the tin, so hiding behind a network appliance is not longer viable for me. An nmap scan showed the port 3306 was hanging out for all to see but I couldn't figure out how to close it off. The "--skip-networking" argument seems not to work, either in my.cnf or as an rc argument. The server just fails to start. (For some reason the socket is hard-coded to live in /tmp, regardless of what's in my.cnf but I gave up bothering about that.) How can you know for sure that your my.cnf is being taken into the account by mysqld at all? I remember some issues that made me to put a symlink /etc/my.cnf to ..//usr/local/etc/my.cnf ... PB> What I ended up doing was adding PB> PB> mysql_args="--bind-address=127.0.0.1" PB> PB> to /etc/rc.conf. This seems to work as netstat and sockstat no longer show port 3306 listening and database connections are happening. PB> PB> Is this the preferred/best way? I just think locking mysqld into the jail(4) is better. ;-) PB> Are you trying to win an argument or solve a problem? Whatever I may need. -- Peter Vereshagin (http://vereshagin.org) pgp: A0E26627 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 18:51:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC991065675 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 18:51:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedmjsun@gmail.com) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D508FC12 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 18:51:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SRpVO-0000oS-Lq for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 11:51:26 -0700 Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 11:51:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Ted Sun To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1336503086669-5695622.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: USA Anonymous CVS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 18:51:27 -0000 I have similar issue earlier today. Then I make it by login first and checkout next. cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@anoncvs.tw.FreeBSD.org:/home/ncvs login cvs co src -rRELENG_8_3_0_RELEASE Best regards, Ted -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/USA-Anonymous-CVS-tp5565539p5695622.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 19:09:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F89106566B for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 19:09:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s12.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s12.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.151]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F8E8FC0C for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 19:09:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP158 ([65.55.111.136]) by blu0-omc4-s12.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 8 May 2012 12:09:28 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [76.182.104.150] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([76.182.104.150]) by BLU0-SMTP158.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 8 May 2012 12:09:27 -0700 Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3Vn9HB4mvtz2CG46 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 15:09:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 15:09:26 -0400 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD Followup-To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEUAAABYRlwJCw4FAgAIBwKprDkBAQFQLR0BAgCir7VRttp8AAACAUlEQVQ4jZWUTYvbMBCGTVl8V2hX6Gg5G5FbWQdBj0lEfE7BhN4cyzi5Wt1E5L70roWy6N92xok/skkP+5IYrMcz78xIduDWpNM3vFzuA/jX5EY1AI6KHFwW/CzFuQAwqUBbV12p+CzIh6Awq7sg33pn5D64SQXAexffeuQlA/L35RrkaB551OjGfP/cAO8mCNaDcgvfky5ijoD0pAXlCQCnljiAjsJD9Ax05Ko5sZxbnLQcmM+dZg5IjREfZrWIHK0JuwU68pAGwHvfRxBundRzTxxz3r9dNUikPsEihjz2Dc4kjp1hKsJGuot4EDxaxzMoC7XqhxhOSfZrTS6gSX1JVdjp+o1PvWfekXgw3WL0g70nDEwA0H0HQsEZc8sTmFMTkWUfYWC/vdR1zQy3xLQgLwzu90QnlnFLjeiGWBjwhb4Sa42IqOg2qqS4O1/zhKokFUb1Q8Rj4Eb69WVflXEehJ35DgChVTE5n50eaGyMLOfH8AOodoSM4PVYAQgQdBulOa+knklYks3vAuQ+uX492lTl+A+e8qBV2AKoXalVKFfyuUp0pUp1ARaUHh82lv9MN+Ig7CZtgE6FNYvjlywT2VP2dMgOG46gTIWcqdfvuwyXNz0oMJNd/N5lh1YNiJt19ADTUo3VuFSNeQwVqRSrGjSCp53fk2g+Mvfk/gfoPxHeUS8MH9vRAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 May 2012 19:09:27.0781 (UTC) FILETIME=[16DBB950:01CD2D4E] Subject: Video not view-able X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 19:09:36 -0000 I have been visiting several sites lately in which the video content was not view-able. Example: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/05/republicans-get-in-my-vagina-kate-beckinsale_n_1484918.html?ref=fb&src=sp&comm_ref=false There is a video there that displays perfectly in MS Windows in either IE8 or 9 and Firefox. However, under FreeBSD-8.3 with the latest version of Firefox all I get is a black box. No controls to click, etcetera. This sort of thing happens way to frequently on way to many sites. It cannot be a simple "blame Microsoft" thing since these sites work under Firefox when used in MS Windows. Does anyone have a possible solution? -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 19:33:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E75D106566B for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 19:33:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig001@lerwick.hopto.org) Received: from skybolt.hopto.org (skybolt.hopto.org [208.79.82.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C8C8FC16 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 19:33:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60315 invoked by uid 98); 8 May 2012 19:26:37 +0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from 93.141.187.81.in-addr.arpa by mailserver (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-2.10 (clamdscan: 0.97.4/14872. mhr: 1.0. spamassassin: 3.3.2. Clear:RC:1(81.187.141.93):. Processed in 0.072279 secs); 08 May 2012 19:26:37 -0000 Received: from 93.141.187.81.in-addr.arpa (HELO ?192.168.1.3?) (81.187.141.93) by skybolt.hopto.org with SMTP; 8 May 2012 19:26:37 +0000 From: Craig Butler To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso8859-1" Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 20:26:36 +0100 Message-ID: <1336505196.63174.6.camel@zbox> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Video not view-able X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 19:33:19 -0000 On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 15:09 -0400, Carmel wrote: > I have been visiting several sites lately in which the video content > was not view-able. > > Example: > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/05/republicans-get-in-my-vagina-kate-beckinsale_n_1484918.html?ref=fb&src=sp&comm_ref=false > > There is a video there that displays perfectly in MS Windows in either > IE8 or 9 and Firefox. However, under FreeBSD-8.3 with the latest > version of Firefox all I get is a black box. No controls to click, > etcetera. This sort of thing happens way to frequently on way to many > sites. It cannot be a simple "blame Microsoft" thing since these sites > work under Firefox when used in MS Windows. > > Does anyone have a possible solution? > Working fine here with 8.2-STABLE amd64, firefox 9, linux-f10-flashplugin-11, and nspluginwrapper Have you installed the flash port ? /CB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 19:55:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66161065670 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 19:55:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gg0-f182.google.com (mail-gg0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D3088FC12 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 19:55:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnm2 with SMTP id m2so1048987ggn.13 for ; Tue, 08 May 2012 12:55:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type; bh=p/s2/TfeyEtv/ibkpCHsGhsFFFFs+aXb2uSjq/Zarqg=; b=ec1vimR/GXi89WZ9mn+8E68ZrBKRzce2CzFYNK3bP3kK0g5ayaZMS+rkN2g/Qb6LS1 mHqv8AUwXtWkmP21bsr0WlsqzYvu3Tx0ghIWfnJ7UVtlLkp+GwZaMb1LFpC08/Kgj3ro lih4BYGNavFHyJZGSHPkYl7rsBkneBBCHuK7M= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=p/s2/TfeyEtv/ibkpCHsGhsFFFFs+aXb2uSjq/Zarqg=; b=j7ZKFQA7KXHxoPCzMMeyhQJQL7xonf2qFzxui+ujU8Qr0+lvFVcPez4mJD32tavR7z HBvwgv4/rXuwrzEI58+mxM+xc+QNrEbo3xPU4xpmK3/WDYMT06FRqfzaECHL+0zI5Heo h1RpWlg26qfABAWtykQCQgng+g8NhEUoVYqWP3LP6JBVXtTkKTSx92ZmmOZTgonJP5Zu j2TY6VZKXPNGTz/WCVSeXD84L2G4WBpdVxgzDXMOY6Y8wAn6Vat3fytHt53+g5HQ5OCV mtUcufpmH5ihIrrc2E34Yf6DRdeoQQerSK/KX5qAlbAJ+CJ7X4aYduucno/RwHxvIT07 vqzg== Received: by 10.236.153.104 with SMTP id e68mr25797202yhk.36.1336506949649; Tue, 08 May 2012 12:55:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h3sm506723anm.20.2012.05.08.12.55.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 May 2012 12:55:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3VnBJg1Zvnz2CG46 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 15:55:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 15:55:36 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120508155536.505fd7ed@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4FA92EDA.3090809@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <898E0B3D-63DD-470C-8F1D-49F478D05C7E@gmail.com> <4FA92EDA.3090809@infracaninophile.co.uk> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/VSfwlzZFFgZGVJOGmTjh3zR"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkqS6H56g3x2HGzWhdKr5ePBtAHtkIoR+UjWXnD/d2Rc9Qjq0OIbm42KkvUY5Rewlou8y4O Subject: Re: securing MySQL: easiest/best ways? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 19:55:50 -0000 --Sig_/VSfwlzZFFgZGVJOGmTjh3zR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 08 May 2012 15:34:02 +0100 Matthew Seaman articulated: >Sounds almost as if the my.cnf you've been editing is not the my.cnf >that your mysql instance is using. IIRC there was some talk about >moving from the usual BSD-ish /var/db/mysql/my.cnf to >/usr/local/etc/my.cnf (no doubt under some insidious influence from >Linux.) The first time I ever looked for "my.cnf" I had expected to find it in "/usr/local/etc". Since so many configuration files are stored there, it just seemed like a natural place for it to be located. IMHO, a centralized repository for configuration files greatly simplifies system maintenance. --=20 Jerry =E2=99=94 Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ --Sig_/VSfwlzZFFgZGVJOGmTjh3zR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPqXpCAAoJEF2rWD2do7dNrXAH/i5DeSdskXmlF4uVHQgEKyCN ptSErPU12OAyYNxmYr69FauNkLVgTD3NJHORAx0uNMvxJzGNKdWmpomVF5fUZKgV yTp9cy8gbmxByIJLepSSH6j3hiw6dr4hJ8pRTalCowJi8nrUy1k1L2Sa65hq+h9g YbV0bv8QM2IHHU5Oeuaf+bwyFmO7kmZ1rhw/oXMepCZ20HP0+ngLF2QwNvB91N1U Duh0IdgLacxVzqJaT0eyrVrj22t4mT6b7koOefP0Waw2tC9Uuf3dNGoGfEBEC/Bs nDavSVP/fqUB+5bXe2PpIS5wM/Bai6y2IXi7S/fErCHJaYft13JNS4vuO5rrosU= =/a+i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/VSfwlzZFFgZGVJOGmTjh3zR-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 20:14:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DCDF106564A for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 20:14:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15288FC15 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 20:14:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eabm6 with SMTP id m6so999605eab.13 for ; Tue, 08 May 2012 13:14:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FXu8QOlzTOePiZ1jE/OZXmxlowGnJmvdIyJMR8tKMLk=; b=IDyzjhiyNzvP/Hd79Zd69NhWvvzNyVCh8rc2hM5sQmixHZCwAiLsd8J/rCwK9NBwe2 fgcjy70UOIf7zHh0n+hexWPxo8k4atWppB7Q/VzPbhsgYl8hs6Hv8Vwcp/qsQIpXlbLX GU/FZzCiwe+hfpyEQTwC4j2/VeZxpL+ajsRthaI3eS3Fs8c61YOJF3pnoDAe+ZMoD5DP Fm/Z9Shn92ag+uTI6dA45ZMPM5kAKVvk0IZHJGV1cSkEHfTiHgXJUDFMCTnDsotE+9nE hGSozIyiH+UeGZYgF97bk/4RBzd5nYky1niHtpghmD1Pkt0gHc26EdDP3O5v7Dvwp58l ymkA== Received: by 10.213.26.217 with SMTP id f25mr89776ebc.3.1336508067279; Tue, 08 May 2012 13:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s54sm1644472eeb.4.2012.05.08.13.14.25 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 May 2012 13:14:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 21:14:23 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120508211423.1ae655c6@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Video not view-able X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 20:14:34 -0000 On Tue, 8 May 2012 15:09:26 -0400 Carmel wrote: > I have been visiting several sites lately in which the video content > was not view-able. > > Example: > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/05/republicans-get-in-my-vagina-kate-beckinsale_n_1484918.html?ref=fb&src=sp&comm_ref=false > > There is a video there that displays perfectly in MS Windows in either > IE8 or 9 and Firefox. However, under FreeBSD-8.3 with the latest > version of Firefox all I get is a black box. No controls to click, > etcetera. This sort of thing happens way to frequently on way to many > sites. It cannot be a simple "blame Microsoft" thing since these sites > work under Firefox when used in MS Windows. I know this isn't what you want to hear, but it works just fine for me. It's a bit anecdotal, but I've had fewer problems with flash video since upgrading to modern hardware a year ago. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 20:37:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A839106566B for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 20:37:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from avasout07.plus.net (avasout07.plus.net [84.93.230.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B64B8FC0C for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 20:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout07 with smtp id 7YZz1j007516WCc01Ya1Gn; Tue, 08 May 2012 21:34:01 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=VpKh8pKn c=1 sm=1 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=rLpCYgkgFLgA:10 a=J6t1BdqNDmwA:10 a=ZTb9aqGL9YkA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=422B3-6Adkj8LwqHhBcA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 Received: by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SRr6d-0005ri-LL for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 21:33:59 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 21:33:59 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201205082133.59417.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Preventing portmaster from using packages for specified ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 20:37:12 -0000 I'm happy to use the -P option to let portmaster use packages for most of my ports but there's a few that must be compiled from the port instead because I need to configure non default options, e.g. to enable GIMP plugin support in graphics/xsane Is there any way of forcing portmaster to never use packages for certain specified ports? -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 20:37:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37D21065740 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 20:37:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from woodbine.london.02.net (woodbine.london.02.net [87.194.255.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7647F8FC12 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 20:37:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muji2.config (87.194.237.233) by woodbine.london.02.net (8.5.140) id 4F70C667011C496F for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 8 May 2012 21:36:04 +0100 Message-ID: <4FA983B3.40002@onetel.com> Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 21:36:03 +0100 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100924 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Video not view-able X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 20:37:27 -0000 On 08/05/2012 20:09, Carmel wrote: > I have been visiting several sites lately in which the video content > was not view-able. > > Example: > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/05/republicans-get-in-my-vagina-kate-beckinsale_n_1484918.html?ref=fb&src=sp&comm_ref=false > > There is a video there that displays perfectly in MS Windows in either > IE8 or 9 and Firefox. However, under FreeBSD-8.3 with the latest > version of Firefox all I get is a black box. No controls to click, > etcetera. This sort of thing happens way to frequently on way to many > sites. It cannot be a simple "blame Microsoft" thing since these sites > work under Firefox when used in MS Windows. > > Does anyone have a possible solution? > Do you have adblock plus installed and enabled? Try disabling it for that page and reloading. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 20:51:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9942D106566B for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 20:51:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s17.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s17.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46BA98FC08 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 20:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP207 ([65.55.111.136]) by blu0-omc4-s17.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 8 May 2012 13:51:10 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [76.182.104.150] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([76.182.104.150]) by BLU0-SMTP207.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 8 May 2012 13:51:08 -0700 Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3VnCXW3Hxzz2CG46 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 16:51:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 16:51:06 -0400 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <20120508211423.1ae655c6@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <20120508211423.1ae655c6@gumby.homeunix.com> Followup-To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 May 2012 20:51:08.0997 (UTC) FILETIME=[4B776750:01CD2D5C] Subject: Re: Video not view-able X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 20:51:16 -0000 On Tue, 8 May 2012 21:14:23 +0100 RW articulated: >On Tue, 8 May 2012 15:09:26 -0400 >Carmel wrote: > >> I have been visiting several sites lately in which the video content >> was not view-able. >> >> Example: >> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/05/republicans-get-in-my-vagina-kate-beckinsale_n_1484918.html?ref=fb&src=sp&comm_ref=false >> >> There is a video there that displays perfectly in MS Windows in >> either IE8 or 9 and Firefox. However, under FreeBSD-8.3 with the >> latest version of Firefox all I get is a black box. No controls to >> click, etcetera. This sort of thing happens way to frequently on way >> to many sites. It cannot be a simple "blame Microsoft" thing since >> these sites work under Firefox when used in MS Windows. > >I know this isn't what you want to hear, but it works just fine for me. > >It's a bit anecdotal, but I've had fewer problems with flash video >since upgrading to modern hardware a year ago. Define "modern hardware". The Windows machine is actually older then the FreeBSD one. -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 20:52:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13D41065687 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 20:52:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F118FC28 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 20:52:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q48KpuOA047051 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 21:51:56 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q48KpuOA047051 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1336510316; bh=hVOMlXMpms9PU0FBWkewLUyto6gghQlrw1Hs+tJTir4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:Content-Type: Message-ID:Mime-Version; b=yhsXa4fMOwzFhUT5UjlBBYjiEOKzBledo7Pgw2Nc1SSOKSxsV2aK9zO+Cbtv6uKp2 NIRnJXh5xTR7uh7xSR0RRoh9oZDmCQbo8Uezm+NmHhYTEzyW1FIrVVDIOeLmZtjAUt HSRwHDp2Aal3GYXsfrHHOSJ8sIB9juxSzuwgGw1c= Message-ID: <4FA98765.3020702@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 21:51:49 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <898E0B3D-63DD-470C-8F1D-49F478D05C7E@gmail.com> <4FA92EDA.3090809@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120508155536.505fd7ed@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120508155536.505fd7ed@scorpio> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigEDB13CCEF32F2E943DA7E716" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_ALL,DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: securing MySQL: easiest/best ways? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 20:52:01 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigEDB13CCEF32F2E943DA7E716 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/05/2012 20:55, Jerry wrote: > On Tue, 08 May 2012 15:34:02 +0100 > Matthew Seaman articulated: >=20 >> >Sounds almost as if the my.cnf you've been editing is not the my.cnf >> >that your mysql instance is using. IIRC there was some talk about >> >moving from the usual BSD-ish /var/db/mysql/my.cnf to >> >/usr/local/etc/my.cnf (no doubt under some insidious influence from >> >Linux.) > The first time I ever looked for "my.cnf" I had expected to find it in > "/usr/local/etc". Since so many configuration files are stored there, > it just seemed like a natural place for it to be located. IMHO, a > centralized repository for configuration files greatly simplifies > system maintenance. Yeah. It's no big deal. But... Maybe you want to run more than one instance of mysql on the same machine= =2E Or you want to move the data directory lock, stock and barrel onto a different server. Maybe it's some ultra fancy fail-over setup with a data dir shared between two servers. Keeping the configs with the data does have a few advantages. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigEDB13CCEF32F2E943DA7E716 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+ph2wACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxCoACfVEpgdQxhflipusZCoCoJHDk2 SjAAn2dVGuQwY/WAzKgjN4NuUpVxkQUL =2P6/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigEDB13CCEF32F2E943DA7E716-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 20:54:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 936901065676 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 20:54:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@drenet.info) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411C38FC1C for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 20:54:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl8 with SMTP id l8so1144288yen.13 for ; Tue, 08 May 2012 13:54:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drenet.info; s=google; h=content-type:to:subject:references:date:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=KtiM3CkMZvZwa/dI4OFEN5g78t0xdjsZ3R84k7n6Cig=; b=CVECnI7UPb2qQI4vGG5aA8TN6LxCWDacJent4U1ZIPy/MNuEZyKPLbYTTNmWmCMeib dI7QMi52vGB3HOfEZf5iqe1z3/RDtkimGMi04gCxD9VPkPs+P8Ds4+X8exPIo265Dnn8 YycQbnAqHdLtTHMfJgDGdxxylBK5UQhqAMMEM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:to:subject:references:date:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-gm-message-state; bh=KtiM3CkMZvZwa/dI4OFEN5g78t0xdjsZ3R84k7n6Cig=; b=iP4tN4URRsY8BCrq9Y4ULc5HikMsKucB+Ucdy0BM7RMTHc3oxmp7ZP33zCiC1xbYUD 3MDSG1TOYXbBua9XtVlRSdQMAHmkSo/e+OA2hJXoEhb7TUrECFqRAEyjhqYK3MmJhW0O BRZk7uMlUiVhebeN+Ee3hLY8e2OE9WrttD6ZkmrznVYJKS0/lA2zw9uOu08Kg2vTO6fH 0/yZrAKGa6MNdHONj9WsJUTKMs1DW7Cuvj0jn3MCXkEVBoG8h4xmHkaqIDa9qP5I7uFS yvyLMlSmsx3WSGExLTaG2Kq0TlAmtGPSSKA7GhZf4kHMY3bkWqlpVt+d2qYvQ0R84sRj iQow== Received: by 10.236.136.8 with SMTP id v8mr8298548yhi.101.1336510447652; Tue, 08 May 2012 13:54:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sideswipe.accesso.office (rrcs-71-43-102-114.se.biz.rr.com. [71.43.102.114]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u20sm793783anm.10.2012.05.08.13.54.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 May 2012 13:54:07 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: FreeBSD References: <898E0B3D-63DD-470C-8F1D-49F478D05C7E@gmail.com> <4FA92EDA.3090809@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120508155536.505fd7ed@scorpio> Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 16:54:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Andre Goree" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20120508155536.505fd7ed@scorpio> User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.62 (Linux) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlMGTFBMmm4t0AnF1o98Pixzl6dq5x1IkCoj//R6hMO+e5NTny3SxzKwECY+cPIfjh07Vfl Subject: Re: securing MySQL: easiest/best ways? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 20:54:08 -0000 On Tue, 08 May 2012 15:55:36 -0400, Jerry wrote: > On Tue, 08 May 2012 15:34:02 +0100 > Matthew Seaman articulated: > >> Sounds almost as if the my.cnf you've been editing is not the my.cnf >> that your mysql instance is using. IIRC there was some talk about >> moving from the usual BSD-ish /var/db/mysql/my.cnf to >> /usr/local/etc/my.cnf (no doubt under some insidious influence from >> Linux.) > > The first time I ever looked for "my.cnf" I had expected to find it in > "/usr/local/etc". Since so many configuration files are stored there, > it just seemed like a natural place for it to be located. IMHO, a > centralized repository for configuration files greatly simplifies > system maintenance. > Hence the reason almost all of my config files are symlinked in someway in /etc/ Call it a habit from spending much of my time using & working on Linux :p -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 20:56:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C931065670 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 20:56:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jwebster0001@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661108FC14 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 20:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so9622035pbb.13 for ; Tue, 08 May 2012 13:56:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=z5e8ao9oML7Dgi7vU0n1smeoEHRI8fI45WRtsaaq8Jg=; b=IxRwYrSMb0jtYIgTXTv1zw6oTkFeAfUcs04TSDPtuOjyoABpu57MH3Vv0jHJvpaKha Ls8z33TSEevDuZ9GawVUeea6y6Ea9gHwOPggIXYu78SKbkrArOIxPavN/caYb7fXf932 FEX9JnnUUmNMvaLVEA/7xEYopmfJ33mfBbFJrnA8pWzkz+FJ710/XJ72ambcg/hrv42f puY2tBiFXdEXBL5XYJ6HDbHWRLnML0sDSih3GqqG/fEM6bV0yVQ39Ay4uSk2Nvw8hrdm pfq98qKg42OhcnbtEx+hyYZb9G8OWTfPxNdN1sP8d4WInS6L4gjJ6dw4Gz1XiExlkAmF yo7A== Received: by 10.68.238.4 with SMTP id vg4mr166523pbc.147.1336510564037; Tue, 08 May 2012 13:56:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.212] (c-24-7-74-255.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.7.74.255]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ov3sm3488524pbb.35.2012.05.08.13.56.02 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 May 2012 13:56:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 13:55:53 -0700 From: John Webster To: Mike Clarke , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <5E7F55D0038D5B0206E5E841@Sky.local> In-Reply-To: <201205082133.59417.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> References: <201205082133.59417.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="==========3BACCA36D779EAF626F9==========" Cc: Subject: Re: Preventing portmaster from using packages for specified ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 20:56:04 -0000 --==========3BACCA36D779EAF626F9========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --On May 8, 2012 9:33:59 PM +0100 Mike Clarke wrote: > > I'm happy to use the -P option to let portmaster use packages for most > of my ports but there's a few that must be compiled from the port > instead because I need to configure non default options, e.g. to enable > GIMP plugin support in graphics/xsane > > Is there any way of forcing portmaster to never use packages for certain > specified ports? > > -- Would this work for you? From the manpage: For those who wish to be sure that specific ports are always compiled instead of being installed from packages the PT_NO_INSTALL_PACKAGE vari- able can be defined in the make(1) environment, perhaps in /usr/local/etc/ports.conf if using /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portconf, or in /etc/make.conf. This setting is not compatible with the -PP/--packages-only option. --==========3BACCA36D779EAF626F9========== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPqYhiAAoJEFWEcdsJ/W2JTuYIAKAEyXpX1bA7KUFdRPjfD9XS V5raKodYVOLX2EfzG2e2yOkux6WmvssCZr27evqQ0E9whYGOOw/coQ/oiM4wRmky X0xeiMhOdeH7nAE/mVv3r7VUgTU63BII/TZ2GRBAgfTkEMzYZeTW1GMM0blfABLn /zBH2g9omJEeOK1KDpwz/p/txyqcWL6DYnCO+OeUHKyEvJp4kXWuH5ch790Gzd/f AdmIOJ/znohyGBsxQhAKjV7UPCx8H2tledlaDXrFn/MR3BKgF2JRLhaGmj/QpjSg DPegYNLC1JsK9KTJjtdl/suTZxEf/d4pNODUqID/rob2fcoyPwLlxRlJZRBRnFs= =g53X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==========3BACCA36D779EAF626F9==========-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 21:20:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E34C3106564A for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 21:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775488FC17 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 21:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl8 with SMTP id l8so1182422yen.13 for ; Tue, 08 May 2012 14:20:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:followup-to :reply-to:organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type; bh=VP3agwTNPfbngQLFf4dttF9sr6Fh+NTNQvu+adO/Ihs=; b=Vl7EzMuhzF0gfoY99CFrsB2LRogjY8N0wVTQp0h4DEu1QMo+Rg3KB/wI94MaNsjgKy EjNaD1SGqDcZoMP9bzGd/7VEK06PmWNZoriox0nsRUCr2LX0F8QlT0Xb4ygUhnXDFFwQ xz9C+mdj2meP+FaGwuL/d2F0d8DnYcqt0t8fk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:followup-to :reply-to:organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=VP3agwTNPfbngQLFf4dttF9sr6Fh+NTNQvu+adO/Ihs=; b=UZyAQN8rvuHFajb2iaiNZNHe14PI1wUqiYI2JXLYigTLsCrIqbjcM1x1SeSMRn7rSs enXfM4JhpVTP5VfcGLZAy9tRrD3VNe3LfXFc3zm3Xcts+cZ30E4rNcKUuyz6NcPvyGOR c5w2a99CJ6C6CnDdylRz7NRw13SS3WBaaRCeEFKGj8hJniEu28WVkfRo2sNdTQgRXtJn y/73BfEpv9aHVw2c7b/QanneVqVxj/MKJZjqsbRf9FljNBZbI40AN/Y/1IgFJTv9TacQ Jlzk6E2AfGMFi891icAQiiNRcMqNytnJfLc40d7XF9AKKm7/nqV9SB0swfJDGjLXZ0vp ezYg== Received: by 10.236.185.167 with SMTP id u27mr11513518yhm.32.1336512012097; Tue, 08 May 2012 14:20:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u2sm2152010yhe.8.2012.05.08.14.20.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 May 2012 14:20:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3VnDB13cSqz2CG46 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 17:20:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 17:20:00 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120508172000.76ca1bdf@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4FA98765.3020702@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <898E0B3D-63DD-470C-8F1D-49F478D05C7E@gmail.com> <4FA92EDA.3090809@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120508155536.505fd7ed@scorpio> <4FA98765.3020702@infracaninophile.co.uk> Followup-To: FreeBSD Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/PjggBA7e3x52p7yrIg.l+Xa"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnZK9o2c50A93To9h2KgoYmmWrnH2ieVnGbRr06QcIAXOX4jXrfEAvCMtCgnLgejRt7kyAj Subject: Re: securing MySQL: easiest/best ways? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 21:20:14 -0000 --Sig_/PjggBA7e3x52p7yrIg.l+Xa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 08 May 2012 21:51:49 +0100 Matthew Seaman articulated: >On 08/05/2012 20:55, Jerry wrote: >> On Tue, 08 May 2012 15:34:02 +0100 >> Matthew Seaman articulated: >>=20 >>> >Sounds almost as if the my.cnf you've been editing is not the >>> >my.cnf that your mysql instance is using. IIRC there was some >>> >talk about moving from the usual BSD-ish /var/db/mysql/my.cnf to >>> >/usr/local/etc/my.cnf (no doubt under some insidious influence from >>> >Linux.) > >> The first time I ever looked for "my.cnf" I had expected to find it >> in "/usr/local/etc". Since so many configuration files are stored >> there, it just seemed like a natural place for it to be located. >> IMHO, a centralized repository for configuration files greatly >> simplifies system maintenance. > >Yeah. It's no big deal. > >But... > >Maybe you want to run more than one instance of mysql on the same >machine. > >Or you want to move the data directory lock, stock and barrel onto a >different server. Maybe it's some ultra fancy fail-over setup with a >data dir shared between two servers. Keeping the configs with the data >does have a few advantages. Actually, it has a lot of advantages. I only run one instance of MySQL; however, for multiple instances, keeping the configs in one location would probably not be advantageous. Someone else mentioned creating a link for the my.cnf file. Since I never touch the my.cnf file once MySQL is setup, I probably would not bother with it, although it is an interesting idea. --=20 Jerry =E2=99=94 Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ --Sig_/PjggBA7e3x52p7yrIg.l+Xa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPqY4JAAoJEF2rWD2do7dNTU0IAI6pSvfgUiX2BdELAPNWJlzf /k6CvOeyCNYLA/c/i8hMtTLzqYwFS2hOK/8vuK+rTnPkGAtifvEQbRVTzMpht2UN x8EuFmMwzYURtOEnitzPxj9zM5LnKnK1fz1kaWvJRHHl46Ku+1CvN4Ia7y7Vo9z9 9juuvSE5gzH8oixtiIwhtI8z5hGfvi2lCl7m6U1ZYxjc9JBgDurIHtE3f+wB52B+ RkfzGuH8eKeNnsLRVeWqCTPlPw8HgxRZz9iaqwZ/TCMJhf1Xq3iew5IlBtLlaNX3 rK7yKoSLiMobGUbnUCJcHZakyZ6Gclg1bbA+RwcAWRfsV+dX7vJ4bvn9r4TcViY= =Vl3T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/PjggBA7e3x52p7yrIg.l+Xa-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 21:51:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6179E106564A for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 21:51:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from avasout07.plus.net (avasout07.plus.net [84.93.230.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD88B8FC0A for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 21:51:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout07 with smtp id 7ZrG1j009516WCc01ZrJcn; Tue, 08 May 2012 22:51:18 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=VpKh8pKn c=1 sm=1 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=rLpCYgkgFLgA:10 a=-Txt6FHj514A:10 a=ZTb9aqGL9YkA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=gczVm7oiezOCPfO6-qUA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 Received: by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SRsJQ-0005wu-KD; Tue, 08 May 2012 22:51:16 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: John Webster Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 22:51:16 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <201205082133.59417.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <5E7F55D0038D5B0206E5E841@Sky.local> In-Reply-To: <5E7F55D0038D5B0206E5E841@Sky.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201205082251.16507.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Preventing portmaster from using packages for specified ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 21:51:20 -0000 On Tuesday 08 May 2012, John Webster wrote: > Would this work for you? =A0From the manpage: > > =A0 =A0 =A0For those who wish to be sure that specific ports are always > compiled instead of being installed from packages the > PT_NO_INSTALL_PACKAGE vari- able can be defined in the make(1) > environment, perhaps in /usr/local/etc/ports.conf if using > /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portconf, or in /etc/make.conf. =A0This setting > is not compatible with the -PP/--packages-only option. Yes, that looks like exactly what I need. I don't know how I missed it,=20 I must have searched through the manpage several times and had a total=20 blind spot for that paragraph - sorry for looking so dumb. =2D-=20 Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 22:24:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EEF106566B for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 22:24:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219CA8FC14 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 22:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werg1 with SMTP id g1so1851614wer.13 for ; Tue, 08 May 2012 15:24:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k14tqvRePC0yS2F9zxST1QuK407/TCg2MCi/rXR19gc=; b=SqDlOJobdgUtaigzQKS/hO5937j22lLZFUvjoqqoKNqGVTG7lUqsQCqgvLlr3AuEhv QnZBjhkrcplqPfo7pZ5w/PJwPYYFLHzuCAe6npQIzrg2JYf9z3DCQFROfCSLmrVipyYb 38e4MVX/NT1SQZS49WnFJTBeA/etAA+BLp6pxSVmh+2qM24ftykn200rWIMdD2Wcx3D4 nAy+X7YV7Mx+dlN7MZvN0MwQDaz+4M5AmS5I+56OqJAUhzJXAFq6ky5oxRdaes/jGB4x WNeEJZPu0pCcqMPmzA4p1wspb7o7e0U9cxa/EPE266AmTO3bxsmppd5qrYAiGZtKVlTN SSdA== Received: by 10.180.107.100 with SMTP id hb4mr3981676wib.22.1336515892068; Tue, 08 May 2012 15:24:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ff9sm32032524wib.2.2012.05.08.15.24.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 May 2012 15:24:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 23:24:48 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120508232448.4cfe8691@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20120508211423.1ae655c6@gumby.homeunix.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Video not view-able X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 22:24:54 -0000 On Tue, 8 May 2012 16:51:06 -0400 Carmel wrote: > On Tue, 8 May 2012 21:14:23 +0100 > RW articulated: > >It's a bit anecdotal, but I've had fewer problems with flash video > >since upgrading to modern hardware a year ago. > > Define "modern hardware". The Windows machine is actually older then > the FreeBSD one. There's no point in comparing performance on Windows and FreeBSD. Anything other than Windows is an afterthought as far as Flash development is concerned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 01:00:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6085106564A for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 01:00:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FBC88FC0C for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 01:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9779E1EAFB; Wed, 9 May 2012 03:00:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q4910J7O001983; Wed, 9 May 2012 03:00:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 03:00:19 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Wojciech Puchar Message-Id: <20120509030019.35237917.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: maybe not truly freebsd related X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 01:00:27 -0000 On Tue, 8 May 2012 16:28:08 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar wrote: > But yet - what graphical mail program can you recommend that have such > simple basic functionality of local mail support in Maildir format? I'm using Sylpheed here. It requires Gtk 2 (which should be fine when you're using Gnome anyway), and it stores mails in MH format (quite comparable to Maildir). Related to TB, it's still very lightweight. There has also been a Gtk 1 version (much more lightweight), but I think it's already out of ports, and its UTF-8 support does not exist. However, it's even faster than the current version. :-) Remember that it's a MUA. It's not a calendar, not a web browser, not a multimedia player and not a PDF viewer. (But you can interface it to open content based on file type by using external programs, such as xmms, xpdf, xzgv etc.). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 01:07:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE05106564A for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 01:07:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david+dated+1336957458.358d38@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2128FC08 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 01:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4914JtL080606 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 21:04:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from david+dated+1336957458.358d38@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q4914IBA080603 for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 8 May 2012 21:04:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from david+dated+1336957458.358d38@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1336957458.358d38@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Tue, 08 May 2012 21:04:18 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 21:04:18 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120509010418.GA78616@skytracker.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) From: David Banning Cc: Subject: error: libm.so.4 needed by libspeex may conflict w libm.so.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 01:07:59 -0000 while attempting to build and install mplayer under FreeBSD Release 8.2 I get the error; /usr/local/bin/ld: warning: libm.so.4, needed by /usr/local/lib/libspeex.so, may conflict with libm.so.5 /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to `XRRGetScreenResourcesCurrent' /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to `XRRGetOutputPrimary' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status gmake: *** [mplayer] Error 1 If it's libspeex / libm.so.4 that is causing the error (thats what it looks like to me) I wonder how to find out what libspeex is being used for - or for that matter what libm.so.4 is needed for. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 01:08:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D480106566B for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 01:08:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jwebster0001@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3348FC0C for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 01:08:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadv36 with SMTP id v36so3326033dad.13 for ; Tue, 08 May 2012 18:08:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=CDKPUEMDrhDwIM5M6HsozgSHI/1Pb7vLTBMOJCpKAhM=; b=RoqY6u0gTYakEfuC731Cm/cfy05d4QPZd/m2mHVjrsVmdpbD+3P8+5TPLZ4jNU7jW7 o3VqHyWy2PcNKzg+uJiGXwULj2wyC64cM0NUB90S6BrL0ydVmXeuQTajsClHW1WqUPb8 KKbY+jH0AvJ3tQTbW81KHasFTV6OzgmxmTk04d9ON18gf48TiqQer00n4KB7LyG8KQS0 sxEoV8CEPBlYE3yCXjYJBtKCUcczeUSZ1en+HuSIlpJROAkdgIX3EZHPLQ3DhlndoXUC YX5b4bZtaGBa0jbol8IiOThb0z1D2sg4znpKScHGaqe97dOy73Nsks7ETWlGqCvzoI66 8fvg== Received: by 10.68.223.169 with SMTP id qv9mr3357034pbc.27.1336525683907; Tue, 08 May 2012 18:08:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.212] (c-24-7-74-255.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.7.74.255]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id tx9sm4128290pbc.10.2012.05.08.18.08.02 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 May 2012 18:08:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 18:08:02 -0700 From: John Webster To: Mike Clarke Message-ID: <233C87C1CBEE79E35D7CE4D4@Sky.local> In-Reply-To: <201205082251.16507.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> References: <201205082133.59417.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <5E7F55D0038D5B0206E5E841@Sky.local> <201205082251.16507.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Preventing portmaster from using packages for specified ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 01:08:04 -0000 --On May 8, 2012 10:51:16 PM +0100 Mike Clarke wrote: > On Tuesday 08 May 2012, John Webster wrote: >=20 >> Would this work for you? =C2=A0From the manpage: >>=20 >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0For those who wish to be sure that specific ports are always >> compiled instead of being installed from packages the >> PT_NO_INSTALL_PACKAGE vari- able can be defined in the make(1) >> environment, perhaps in /usr/local/etc/ports.conf if using >> /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portconf, or in /etc/make.conf. =C2=A0This setting >> is not compatible with the -PP/--packages-only option. >=20 > Yes, that looks like exactly what I need. I don't know how I missed it,=20 > I must have searched through the manpage several times and had a total=20 > blind spot for that paragraph - sorry for looking so dumb. >=20 > --=20 > Mike Clarke I know how that is, I've missed stuff in the manpages too. > sorry for looking so dumb. Not dumb. You had a question and you asked it on freebsd-questions looking for an answer. That's smart in my book. That's what the=20 list is for. Cheers, jw From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 01:34:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BE3106564A for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 01:34:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33DE8FC12 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 01:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CAA3D143; Wed, 9 May 2012 03:34:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q491YNKY002435; Wed, 9 May 2012 03:34:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 03:34:23 +0200 From: Polytropon To: David Banning Message-Id: <20120509033423.0638e4f9.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120509010418.GA78616@skytracker.ca> References: <20120509010418.GA78616@skytracker.ca> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: error: libm.so.4 needed by libspeex may conflict w libm.so.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 01:34:31 -0000 On Tue, 8 May 2012 21:04:18 -0400, David Banning wrote: > If it's libspeex / libm.so.4 that is causing the error (thats what it looks like to me) > I wonder how to find out what libspeex is being used for - or for that matter what > libm.so.4 is needed for. I see you start exploring the joy of "front page decisions based upon information provided exactly there". :-) Speex is a codec intended for speech compression (and libspeex is its corresponding library implementation), and libm is the math library of your FreeBSD system (OS, not a port). However, I have mplayer 1.0.r20110329_3 installed here on FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE (i386), using speex 1.2.r1_3,1. If you have problems installing it, and you know you're not going to need it, just do a "make config" in the mplayer port's directory and deselect "SPEEX" option, then it shouldn't be built. Is your ports tree up to date? Maybe there's a newer version of speex or mplayer that will happily work with the system's libm v5? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 07:37:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326A4106564A for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 07:37:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1468FC0A for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 07:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.net (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q497ad7f053567; Wed, 9 May 2012 09:36:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CE21312343; Wed, 9 May 2012 09:36:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 09:36:39 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: David Banning Message-ID: <20120509073639.GA21213@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: <20120509010418.GA78616@skytracker.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120509010418.GA78616@skytracker.ca> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: error: libm.so.4 needed by libspeex may conflict w libm.so.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 07:37:12 -0000 --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:04:18PM -0400, David Banning wrote: > while attempting to build and install mplayer under FreeBSD Release 8.2 I > get the error; >=20 > /usr/local/bin/ld: warning: libm.so.4, needed by /usr/local/lib/libspeex.= so, > may conflict with libm.so.5 /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined > reference to `XRRGetScreenResourcesCurrent' > /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to > `XRRGetOutputPrimary' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status gmake: *** > [mplayer] Error 1 >=20 > If it's libspeex / libm.so.4 that is causing the error (thats what it loo= ks > like to me) I wonder how to find out what libspeex is being used for - or > for that matter what libm.so.4 is needed for. This sounds like a ports rebuild gone wrong. Did you by any chance upgrade your ports in-place when updating the system from FreeBSD 7 to FreeBSD 8? Or did you install libspeex from a package? Try running the following command: `ldd /usr/local/lib/libspeex.so`. If the output of that command indeed includes libm.so.4, you should re-install the libspeex port before continuing. Make sure your ports tree is up-to-date, a= nd then do: # cd /usr/ports/audio/speex # make deinstall # make install clean Then continue the mplayer build. It might be a good idea to check if there are other libraries relying on ol= der system libs out there; # find /usr/local/lib -type f -name '*.so' -exec ldd {} \; >deps.txt # grep libm.so.4 deps.txt # grep libc.so.6 deps.txt If the grep commands returns any output, you can search deps.txt to see whi= ch library uses the older system libraries. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+qHocACgkQEnfvsMMhpyWMCwCeO0fmQpMY4m1UAnHmeSR1Uxqw vc8AoItdO/AbZh7ytvU56RsfXvsMWVHa =q6UO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 08:04:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7687106566B for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 08:04:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from btv1==47684323d0b==p.stroo@goes.nl) Received: from smtpgraveyard.zeelandnet.nl (smtpgraveyard.zeelandnet.nl [212.115.192.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675AA8FC0C for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 08:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.zeelandnet.nl (unknown [10.255.255.204]) by smtpgraveyard.zeelandnet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D272B40C3 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 09:31:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fsspam.goes.nl (217-63-69-81.zeelandnet.nl [217.63.69.81]) by mail.zeelandnet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F7B15812B for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 09:31:03 +0200 (CEST) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1336548663-0413771ded3bc40001-jLrpzn Received: from mail.goes.nl ([89.1.0.4]) by fsspam.goes.nl with ESMTP id VRN73zAzHcyxthl0 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 09:31:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: p.stroo@goes.nl X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 89.1.0.4 Received: from do_gemgoes-MTA by mail.goes.nl with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 09 May 2012 09:29:23 +0200 Message-Id: <4FAA38F00200001800116228@mail.goes.nl> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 8.0.2 Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 09:29:20 +0200 From: "Paul Stroo" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Network strangeness only with incoming email&In-Reply-To= Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=__Part517FB9C0.0__=" X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[89.1.0.4] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1336548663 X-Barracuda-URL: http://192.168.3.21:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at goes.nl X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.96423 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Network strangeness only with incoming email&In-Reply-To= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 08:04:30 -0000 This is a MIME message. If you are reading this text, you may want to consider changing to a mail reader or gateway that understands how to properly handle MIME multipart messages. --=__Part517FB9C0.0__= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi....=20 =20 Having same problem with barracuda spam firewall..... :(=20 =20 Problem only with some senders and only with attachments.=20 Receiving mail from senders without attachment no problems.....=20 =20 Regards,=20 Paul Stroo =20 Goes is fairtrade- en millenniumgemeente: duurzaamheid staat bij ons dus ho= og in het vaandel.=0D Denkt u daarom alstublieft aan het milieu voordat u dit bericht en eventuee= l de bijlagen (dubbelzijdig) print.=0D ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= -----=0D De informatie verzonden met dit E-mail bericht is uitsluitend bestemd voor = de geadresseerde.=0D Gebruik van de inhoud ervan door anderen zonder toestemming van de afzender= of geadresseerde is niet toegestaan.=0D De gemeente Goes staat niet in voor de juiste en volledige overbrenging van= de inhoud van een verzonden E-mail, noch voor tijdige ontvangst daarvan.= =0D Mocht dit e-mailbericht ten onrechte bij u zijn terechtgekomen, dan verzoek= en wij u vriendelijk het te retourneren aan de afzender.=0D Dit e-mailbericht is gescand op virussen door McAfee=0D ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= -----= --=__Part517FB9C0.0__=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 08:15:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 825B5106566C for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 08:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@vereshagin.org) Received: from mx1.skyriver.ru (ns1.skyriver.ru [89.108.118.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37AD78FC0A for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 08:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (h-234-182.a189.priv.bahnhof.se [81.170.234.182]) by mx1.skyriver.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 26F505AE6 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:15:51 +0400 (MSK) Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 12:15:42 +0400 From: Peter Vereshagin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120509081541.GA12699@external.screwed.box> References: <898E0B3D-63DD-470C-8F1D-49F478D05C7E@gmail.com> <4FA92EDA.3090809@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120508155536.505fd7ed@scorpio> <4FA98765.3020702@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FA98765.3020702@infracaninophile.co.uk> Organization: ' X-Face: 8T>{1owI$Byj]]a; ^G]kRf*dkq>E-3':F>4ODP[#X4s"dr?^b&2G@'3lukno]A1wvJ_L(~u 6>I2ra/<,j1%@C[LN=>p#_}RIV+#:KTszp-X$bQOj,K Subject: Re: securing MySQL: easiest/best ways? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 08:15:59 -0000 Hello. 2012/05/08 21:51:49 +0100 Matthew Seaman => To freebsd-questions@freebsd.org : MS> data dir shared between two servers. Keeping the configs with the data MS> does have a few advantages. I know yet another reason to do this. In common case this isn't mysql-specific. There may be a 'chroot' feature built into the daemon like mysqld that means that daemon does chroot(2) first when it is running, and the directory to chroot is the its own data directory, say, /var/db/mysql. This way it should be able to re-read its configuration file on receiving, say HUP or USR1 posix signal to chenge its settings on the fly. This is why in this particular case the configuration file must reside within the databse directory. -- Peter Vereshagin (http://vereshagin.org) pgp: A0E26627 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 11:56:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1113106564A for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 11:56:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from anakin.london.02.net (anakin.london.02.net [87.194.255.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559B98FC14 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 11:56:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muji2.config (87.194.237.233) by anakin.london.02.net (8.5.140) id 4EEB63D202BD3FD7 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:56:19 +0100 Message-ID: <4FAA5B63.3010307@onetel.com> Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 12:56:19 +0100 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100924 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120501120654.GA4883@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120501124110.GB5007@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4FA032AE.8050902@onetel.com> <20120508140604.GA12758@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20120508140604.GA12758@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: ACPI temprature settings [WAS: Re: laptop very hot and noisy] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 11:56:27 -0000 On 08/05/2012 15:06, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Anyway, this was easier than I expected. > I removed a lot of dust from the fan > and the heat sink gills. I also replaced > the "thermal material". I prop my mine up off the desk to get better airflow to the fan intake which is on the underside. The fan slows down when I lift it up indicating it is moving more air. > > I rebuilt gcc47 and saw the highest temperature of 75. > This is on the southern side, so not too bad. The > noise reduced too. > > Now, I'd just like to understand better the > meaning of these console messages: > > May 8 15:00:08 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC3: temperature 64.0>= setpoint 40.0 > May 8 15:00:08 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC2: temperature 64.0>= setpoint 50.0 > May 8 15:00:18 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC3: temperature 64.0>= setpoint 40.0 > May 8 15:00:18 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC2: temperature 64.0>= setpoint 50.0 > May 8 15:00:28 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC3: temperature 64.0>= setpoint 40.0 > May 8 15:00:28 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC2: temperature 64.0>= setpoint 50.0 > May 8 15:00:38 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC3: temperature 64.0>= setpoint 40.0 > May 8 15:00:38 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC2: temperature 64.0>= setpoint 50.0 > May 8 15:00:48 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC3: temperature 65.0>= setpoint 40.0 > May 8 15:00:48 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC2: temperature 65.0>= setpoint 50.0 > > Where are setpoints defined? > What's acpi_tz? > What are AC1, AC2, AC3? > Which kernel tunables are involved in the > switching from one fan speed to another > (assuming AC1, AC2, AC3 are related to fan > speed in some way)? > > I had a quick look at ⌡aacpi(4), > but none of the above are mentioned. > > Many thanks for all your help. > Google for "acpi_tz0: _CRT value is absurd, ignored" and you will find a long thread with some hopefully useful pointers. You may need to bone up on the ACPI reference and custom ASL's for FreeBSD. I've forgotten most of it now but I think you will find references for both of them in that thread. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 11:57:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11A1106566B for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 11:57:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-gg0-f182.google.com (mail-gg0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762368FC08 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 11:57:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnm2 with SMTP id m2so141037ggn.13 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 04:57:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=GdvbS4whbiXrKlP1ia8MmWQHlET51gHYRJe4efQO3gY=; b=KoLfs3sElRCqx6zTnMEmD1gEY8mTOV8ggv4eLcet/pfwub7XeoGu8L6GQunJGQ5gj5 7XhFVldFk2dNLLNvJ4IsXb2GZEHjxIY7mB/H2p14yH97WTWXpB2VD3Q+OEVYo54dfvcv Je9rkUYZKPIZrFcWPlc3vAi/9b1wL5TbjDT/klHocMcnlE1Q55PLJuETRwNgLWYMCGz6 0tiubBXNZ2lsK7sZK0ajk2QTbrk4mxSLocGSuGq7mQfJG7iDQjMUIwIAPGEX2VKtRR57 wbfrFdJwLewxeTi/99jgi3yJi/9ewkVmGx7FC4QGzmrWdupBlarCYAQzO7wxMhr17L3G iA+g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.197.233 with SMTP id ix9mr12725107igc.26.1336564626792; Wed, 09 May 2012 04:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.231.74.138 with HTTP; Wed, 9 May 2012 04:57:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201205031335.q43DZUKx025041@mail.r-bonomi.com> Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 07:57:06 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: N3f9J8yijjhnGotGWm3dWyLjUkA Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: Robert Bonomi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkSR19fnbz1c3D3hQ2O0RbMhWEWs86a6reQFNaC4iFaEMTCGVnHEGpb7MJZzQiruPdGPAz5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 11:57:09 -0000 On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Robert Bonomi = wrote: >> [...] >> One comment: for 'defensive' purposes it would be useful to break ad6 up >> into two slices, putting 'basejail' in it's own slice. =A0Then, for prod= uction >> use, that slice can be mounted RO, and with the 'system immutable' flag >> set on everything in that filesystem. >> > > Yes. From one of your posts that became somewhat clear to me: Having > all the jails on a single 150GB slice seems like a bad idea. > For your recommendation above, what are the advantages or differences of slicing the disk versus partitioning on a single slice? Thanks, --=20 Alejandro Imass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 12:04:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DB41065674 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:04:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ndhertbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618AA8FC24 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:04:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so239962yhg.13 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 05:04:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iwfcRgfameV+NyGtm8/xMIlSxp/wANFasCVFCf49zNs=; b=a1Zv504+desg2PDaus4zjNodjvuJGBnGV5+RV1zxK6qIqIBnvbwqTsJ7IVsObWaHNX DQ7fjKI2+dXyvmM3Arwc0+1CkIAX+axq69dRPvVsrKae8nOwKwAxnDImJqIDkiZ1ajVn X8A1A9ArDih5BO5uie5h/gzjVF4bbG1DO8caMsxQK1NeHBswZ9JmyRjQPjf60rKwTZvo bBJc1iSA86dhGEOHsd1pNwg7PSpQWQoDa0pfRqxTBawav+25VQlHSYG60av7fN3t1HAM iNShXq9C51eW5Y96M/eDG43fVQrvsSLCm6wDVBdAmwp3iJDpPAEgSXobpaEDIFxB/sXB oxbg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.220.227 with SMTP id pz3mr12818426igc.7.1336565075893; Wed, 09 May 2012 05:04:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.88.138 with HTTP; Wed, 9 May 2012 05:04:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 14:04:35 +0200 Message-ID: From: n dhert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: User can't login but /etc/(master.)passwd OK X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 12:04:37 -0000 I have a problem with a login on FreeBSD (8.3-p1) Dont' know what was done wrong, but a certain user (lets call it THATUSER) can no longer login. the entries for 'THATUSER in /etc/passwd and /etc/master.passwd are still the same as from a backup of 14 days ago (no change in encrypted passwd) The /etc/pwd.db and /etc/spwd.db are binary files so I can't check.. The home-directory of THATUSER is still present and contents looks normal .. All users have quota, but for this particular user: # quota -v THATUSER responds quota: THATUSER: unknown user # edquota -u THATUSER edquota: THATUSER: no such user # repquota /home does not show that user anymore Other users, no problem So it seems that user is unknown to the system ?? What can be the reason and how to solve ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 12:53:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B421065673 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:53:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erich@alogreentechnologies.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D4D8FC14 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:53:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amd620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q49CrXnr024510; Wed, 9 May 2012 06:53:41 -0600 From: Erich Dollansky Organization: ALO Green Technologies Pte Ltd To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 19:53:27 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.3-STABLE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201205091953.28091.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> Cc: Alejandro Imass , Robert Bonomi Subject: Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 12:53:51 -0000 Hi, On Wednesday 09 May 2012 18:57:06 Alejandro Imass wrote: > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote: > >> > > [...] > > >> One comment: for 'defensive' purposes it would be useful to break ad6 up > >> into two slices, putting 'basejail' in it's own slice. Then, for production > >> use, that slice can be mounted RO, and with the 'system immutable' flag > >> set on everything in that filesystem. > >> > > > > Yes. From one of your posts that became somewhat clear to me: Having > > all the jails on a single 150GB slice seems like a bad idea. > > > > For your recommendation above, what are the advantages or differences > of slicing the disk versus partitioning on a single slice? > it could be a misunderstanding. What is a partition? What is a slice. I have to look always into the handbook. Anyway, as long the OS see different units which have to be mounted independent of each other, it all does not matter what is what. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 13:30:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E7D1065670 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 13:30:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31338FC15 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 13:30:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werg1 with SMTP id g1so236934wer.13 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 06:30:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=JqxNLwT5d/Yj693gbJ9Z8tZj7ZbWmPTtUgv6h/4cgrA=; b=BkW5kl6J2/tN3+NsLFQ0SAiKhWcfttLeFaGZDYR4m9QadiNrd5z45Irdp8UhjClDsa G3it+SQ8lfsMf+rc10+MX9xmqX81U17xWZGkGuctaxKvp96P9OMtt+uyUTJQVa8hOGxf 7gOMEqxvsSP5sqUJlfCYJA2Ok+4ExMx2vHQh4vDpJU9Qtt5HaCQp+wSS3qCx5psM9HVk f44WGPgKy4mkyeWMxPPNQaiHG5Ty4pXSh9zVWVFo/UYht+jsm3iLiRMUhfR48H79H+H8 CLXH60N94WWb+OX2MPTfZl2un6FWqUzUMSO7h9r+0+8JCeJukDEEVhsN5JjtO4pvUD3z 9lRA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.88.199 with SMTP id bi7mr1495870igb.26.1336570237786; Wed, 09 May 2012 06:30:37 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.231.74.138 with HTTP; Wed, 9 May 2012 06:30:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201205091953.28091.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> References: <201205091953.28091.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 09:30:37 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: PScRhQ4pP-8aF4msh29Q1kijuZ0 Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: Erich Dollansky Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQllVKjjtdFkNeSBRWgGgkR2S1i7gwpD+Q9g0ysnpjqVPZMqGDkjkGGF+drIxJQJPcSsiDhc Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Robert Bonomi Subject: Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 13:30:40 -0000 On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Wednesday 09 May 2012 18:57:06 Alejandro Imass wrote: >> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: >> > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote: >> >> >> >> [...] >> >> >> One comment: for 'defensive' purposes it would be useful to break ad6= up >> >> into two slices, putting 'basejail' in it's own slice. =A0Then, for p= roduction >> >> use, that slice can be mounted RO, and with the 'system immutable' fl= ag >> >> set on everything in that filesystem. >> >> >> > >> > Yes. From one of your posts that became somewhat clear to me: Having >> > all the jails on a single 150GB slice seems like a bad idea. >> > >> >> For your recommendation above, what are the advantages or differences >> of slicing the disk versus partitioning on a single slice? >> > it could be a misunderstanding. What is a partition? What is a slice. I h= ave to look always into the handbook. Anyway, as long the OS see different = units which have to be mounted independent of each other, it all does not m= atter what is what. > I meant in Unix terms of course. Slice is slice (partition in other OS) and partition a thru h The question is if it has any advantage of using a slice to mount the basejail in RO as opposed to doing the same thing on a partition. Thanks, --=20 Alejandro Imass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 13:38:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309C11065672 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 13:38:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED108FC0C for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 13:38:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C333CF69; Wed, 9 May 2012 15:38:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q49Dc5e2001884; Wed, 9 May 2012 15:38:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 15:38:05 +0200 From: Polytropon To: n dhert Message-Id: <20120509153805.5c364b3c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: User can't login but /etc/(master.)passwd OK X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 13:38:08 -0000 On Wed, 9 May 2012 14:04:35 +0200, n dhert wrote: > the entries for 'THATUSER in /etc/passwd and /etc/master.passwd are still > the same as from a backup > of 14 days ago (no change in encrypted passwd) > The /etc/pwd.db and /etc/spwd.db are binary files so I can't check.. You can easily rebuild them from the text files using pwd_mkdb. Is /ect/group also okay? > The home-directory of THATUSER is still present and contents looks normal .. Does the home directory itself (the "path leading to it") also look correct (owner & permissions)? > All users have quota, but for this particular user: > # quota -v THATUSER > responds > quota: THATUSER: unknown user > # edquota -u THATUSER > edquota: THATUSER: no such user > # repquota /home does not show that user anymore Maybe a side effect? Can you provide more error messages maybe? Does /var/log/messages or /var/log/auth.log show something relevant when the user in question attempts an login? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 13:48:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90BC41065670 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 13:48:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9E68FC0A for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 13:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD2211; Wed, 9 May 2012 15:48:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q49Dm7Kt001918; Wed, 9 May 2012 15:48:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 15:48:07 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Alejandro Imass Message-Id: <20120509154807.b6e9ee4e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <201205091953.28091.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 13:48:09 -0000 On Wed, 9 May 2012 09:30:37 -0400, Alejandro Imass wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Erich Dollansky > wrote: > >> For your recommendation above, what are the advantages or differences > >> of slicing the disk versus partitioning on a single slice? > >> > > it could be a misunderstanding. What is a partition? What is a slice. I have to look always into the handbook. Anyway, as long the OS see different units which have to be mounted independent of each other, it all does not matter what is what. > > > > I meant in Unix terms of course. Slice is slice (partition in other > OS) and partition a thru h > > The question is if it has any advantage of using a slice to mount the > basejail in RO as opposed to doing the same thing on a partition. The answer is: It it not possible. :-) You cannot mount a slice. Given the BSD terminology: A slice _has_ to contain partitions. You cannot format a slice, you can only format partitions. A formatted partition carries a UFS file system. (However, it's possible to omit the slice, and partition the whole disk instead, this is called "dedicated mode"). A third method is formatting the whole disk ("the 'c' device"), in that case the 'c' is omitted. The _only_ time you can mount a slice is when it is used in its common meaning, being a "DOS primary partition"; in this case, a FAT or NTFS file system will be placed directly into a slice, as those do not support any (BSD-style) partitioning. /dev/ad0 -> the disk /dev/ad0s1 -> 1st slice /dev/ad0s1a -> 1st partition on 1st slice THIS is something you can mount. -or- /dev/ad0a -> 1st partition on disk ("dedicated") THIS can also be mounted. -or- /dev/ad0 -> the whole disk (equals /dev/ad0c) Even THIS can be mounted. In case I'm misunderstanding your question, could you alter the expression? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 13:55:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473781065670 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 13:55:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE788FC15 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 13:55:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amd620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q49DsuVb008043; Wed, 9 May 2012 07:55:09 -0600 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 20:54:47 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.3-STABLE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201205091953.28091.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201205092054.47719.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Cc: Alejandro Imass , Robert Bonomi Subject: Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 13:55:12 -0000 Hi, On Wednesday 09 May 2012 20:30:37 Alejandro Imass wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Erich Dollansky > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wednesday 09 May 2012 18:57:06 Alejandro Imass wrote: > >> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > >> > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote: > >> >> > >> > >> [...] > >> > >> >> One comment: for 'defensive' purposes it would be useful to break ad6 up > >> >> into two slices, putting 'basejail' in it's own slice. Then, for production > >> >> use, that slice can be mounted RO, and with the 'system immutable' flag > >> >> set on everything in that filesystem. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Yes. From one of your posts that became somewhat clear to me: Having > >> > all the jails on a single 150GB slice seems like a bad idea. > >> > > >> > >> For your recommendation above, what are the advantages or differences > >> of slicing the disk versus partitioning on a single slice? > >> > > it could be a misunderstanding. What is a partition? What is a slice. I have to look always into the handbook. Anyway, as long the OS see different units which have to be mounted independent of each other, it all does not matter what is what. > > > > I meant in Unix terms of course. Slice is slice (partition in other > OS) and partition a thru h > > The question is if it has any advantage of using a slice to mount the > basejail in RO as opposed to doing the same thing on a partition. > I do not think so. As long it is mounted as a separated unit, FreeBSD has to keep everything separated. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 14:30:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B788D1065679 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 14:30:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E8C8FC0A for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 14:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q49ETF8H042159; Thu, 10 May 2012 00:29:16 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 00:29:15 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Anton Shterenlikht In-Reply-To: <20120509115639.BED74106577B@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20120509231835.W94518@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20120509115639.BED74106577B@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1025041368-1336573080=:94518" Content-ID: <20120510001818.H94518@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Chris Whitehouse Subject: Re: ACPI temprature settings [WAS: Re: laptop very hot and noisy] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 14:30:46 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-1025041368-1336573080=:94518 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-ID: <20120510001818.C94518@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 414, Issue 3, Message: 2 On Tue, 8 May 2012 15:06:04 +0100 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 07:59:58PM +0100, Chris Whitehouse wrote: > > On 01/05/2012 13:41, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > >So I might need to pull the laptop apart.. > > >I'm just not sure I could put it back > > >together... > > > > > >Thanks anyway > > > > service manual (c02834030.pdf): > > http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/CoreRedirect.jsp?redirectReason=DocIndexPDF&prodSeriesId=3368539&targetPage=http%3A%2F%2Fbizsupport1.austin.hp.com%2Fbc%2Fdocs%2Fsupport%2FSupportManual%2Fc02834030%2Fc02834030.pdf > > > > short url: > > http://bit.ly/Ivgs5C > > > > HP are pretty good about service manuals. > > yes, this is partly why I bought an HP laptop. > I had previous experience with other HP/Compaq/Digital > hardware and manuals - they are generally very good. > > Anyway, this was easier than I expected. > I removed a lot of dust from the fan > and the heat sink gills. I also replaced > the "thermal material". > > I rebuilt gcc47 and saw the highest temperature of 75. > This is on the southern side, so not too bad. The > noise reduced too. Happiness is a warm CPU .. so much easier the next time it needs doing. > Now, I'd just like to understand better the > meaning of these console messages: > > May 8 15:00:08 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC3: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 40.0 > May 8 15:00:08 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC2: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 50.0 > May 8 15:00:18 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC3: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 40.0 > May 8 15:00:18 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC2: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 50.0 > May 8 15:00:28 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC3: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 40.0 > May 8 15:00:28 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC2: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 50.0 > May 8 15:00:38 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC3: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 40.0 > May 8 15:00:38 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC2: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 50.0 > May 8 15:00:48 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC3: temperature 65.0 >= setpoint 40.0 > May 8 15:00:48 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC2: temperature 65.0 >= setpoint 50.0 > > Where are setpoints defined? > What's acpi_tz? > What are AC1, AC2, AC3? > Which kernel tunables are involved in the > switching from one fan speed to another > (assuming AC1, AC2, AC3 are related to fan > speed in some way)? To add to What Chris said, perhaps more directly see acpi_thermal(4) Please show us `sysctl hw.acpi`? Particularly `sysctl hw.acpi.thermal` shows your machine's thermal zone(s) settings. These messages are re your zone tz1, which sure looks like an active mode multi-setpoint fan. This logging does appear strange; it suggests that the temperature is always reading as 64 or 65C - which sounds reasonable given it peaks at 75C - but since that's greater than either of the 40C and 50C setpoints, I don't see why it should (appear to) change between _AC2 and _AC3 every 10 seconds, most likely the value of hw.acpi.thermal.polling_rate Do you hear a fan changing speed at that frequency? Does that echo what hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature reports from time to time? Do you have any extra ACPI debugging enabled? Or did you last boot with verbose messages? If so, maybe it's just reporting fan change activity? Unless someone here has an explanation, I suspect this would be of interest on the freebsd-acpi@ list, where core acpi folks hang out. > I had a quick look at ⌡aacpi(4), > but none of the above are mentioned. Searching acpi(4) for thermal|THERMAL gets you there, but yes, you first needed to know that 'tz' means 'thermal zone'. ACPI be deep and wide .. cheers, Ian --0-1025041368-1336573080=:94518-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 15:02:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC95E106564A for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 15:02:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC738FC08 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 15:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q49F3xwH004097; Wed, 9 May 2012 10:03:59 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 10:03:59 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201205091503.q49F3xwH004097@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, ndhertbsd@gmail.com In-Reply-To: Cc: Subject: Re: User can't login but /etc/(master.)passwd OK X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 15:02:50 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 9 07:09:19 2012 > Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 14:04:35 +0200 > From: n dhert > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: User can't login but /etc/(master.)passwd OK > > I have a problem with a login on FreeBSD (8.3-p1) > > Dont' know what was done wrong, but a certain user (lets call it > THATUSER) can no longer login. > > the entries for 'THATUSER in /etc/passwd and /etc/master.passwd are still > the same as from a backup > of 14 days ago (no change in encrypted passwd) > The /etc/pwd.db and /etc/spwd.db are binary files so I can't check.. > > The home-directory of THATUSER is still present and contents looks normal .. "Details are *IMPORTANT*" What is shown for the 'owner' useraame/groupname for files in that directory? What does a long-form listing of the entry for the home-directory _itself_ show? Specifically with regard to the 'owner' username and groupname? > All users have quota, but for this particular user: > # quota -v THATUSER > responds > quota: THATUSER: unknown user > # edquota -u THATUSER > edquota: THATUSER: no such user > # repquota /home does not show that user anymore > > Other users, no problem > So it seems that user is unknown to the system ?? > > What can be the reason and how to solve ? All of this suggests that user THATUSER is -not- the "name" that you "think" it is. Possibly that some glyph in THATUSER is not in the ASCII set, but is an 'extended' character that 'looks like' an ASII symbol in what you are keyboarding to represent THATUSER. *OR* that there is 'whitespace' preceeding/following THATUSER. *OR* that there is an embedded {char}[BS] sequence. Does 'grep THATUSER /etc/passwd' produce a user line as you expect? IF so, does 'grep THATUSER /etc/passwd | od -xc' show anything 'unexpected'? How about the same checks on /etc/master.passwd ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 15:08:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A911106566B for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 15:08:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-gg0-f182.google.com (mail-gg0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F1F8FC15 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 15:08:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnm2 with SMTP id m2so310739ggn.13 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 08:08:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=k1TIZ9ztT6NYn3xp4fEYf0IHDBBAJfTnhgNpbALpakI=; b=JFFXx/W2izK0xdaj7oV9hr+jdvSW2t0SoRxUIImaIEItXoS+EGRbUMiq4B3YnlA6A+ WHjVg8NEKsaxWOBpnm1zKBLyXm1xWY6rC/RStG5tWAyBZ2WMNJeo6C59qSFwx8ePdA3X rj9XMOQPxfjWs4XvNImXdxtOjaGYE3Jq/Ak7tkm0JxzohdmkoUIarzFdpRMtz96GsdMg hOngNfbaMbYinTrLW5NY/JAsPJRbZYY5ly5bdR7RGYHVMnOOv3oRewH63/1BzgA5iDII UkujoEZ5lAgMveNfmQBKx6XkG3jSUfCmnLyPpRmGJIcCqywkbahbJRwOQlPWm4aldn3B f1pA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.115.74 with SMTP id d50mr484549yhh.95.1336576112157; Wed, 09 May 2012 08:08:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.95.45 with HTTP; Wed, 9 May 2012 08:08:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201205091503.q49F3xwH004097@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <201205091503.q49F3xwH004097@mail.r-bonomi.com> Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 08:08:32 -0700 Message-ID: From: Michael Sierchio To: Robert Bonomi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk4gFiALT1N8dKV7FY7yhrrJZrsSFDffhtaAixv/R86jbJqXZwKlhwuZ01mMoCRl/S60IQi Cc: ndhertbsd@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: User can't login but /etc/(master.)passwd OK X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 15:08:33 -0000 On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote: > "Details are *IMPORTANT*" What's the user's shell in the password file, and does that shell: exist? executable? In the /etc/shells file? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 15:27:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F8171065674 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 15:27:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (av-tac-rtp.cisco.com [64.102.19.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0115D8FC1F for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 15:27:24 +0000 (UTC) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from rooster.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q49FLp6c025437 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 11:21:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dhcp-64-102-211-16.cisco.com (dhcp-64-102-211-16.cisco.com [64.102.211.16]) by rooster.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q49FLo3p016340 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 11:21:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FAA8B8E.2070506@marcuscom.com> Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 11:21:50 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Questions on adaptive mutexes and trylock X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 15:27:25 -0000 The newest GLib (as well as PHP APC) is starting to use adaptive mutexes in their code. When a mutex type is set to adaptive and you try to call pthread_mutex_trylock() on it, you get back an EINVAL. Is this a bug, or should this really be happening (the code clearly indicates adaptive mutexes are not handled by trylock)? I imagine Linux is not doing this since the code doesn't abort on Linux as it does on FreeBSD. Should we be silently allowing trylock to perform a no-op on adaptive mutexes, or should we be handling adaptive mutexes with trylock? Thanks. Joe -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 16:02:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2BFE106566B for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 16:02:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brian@brianwhalen.net) Received: from mail-ob0-f196.google.com (mail-ob0-f196.google.com [209.85.214.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805DC8FC0A for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 16:02:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwd18 with SMTP id wd18so278809obb.7 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 09:02:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=M1ZfA7qdz+vIne0KonRnUmjR+MAlzvMGExVLlJWEmvE=; b=QVZybnxI4g4w+eE2m95gyjrq0Lx7UXGLqwtZ3zuQWFgGFJ8BQHAJdOtSrbZwRz/h9V nQoVbpvDJZyzTfkKa5z+9IELWVJELInZn3YGY3l2jqxQ0FhcgFbn9mNbNIbfu6s2JTXm DEuz3DFaVukGtbJSamXFoiwe1mQU7/Ncpf5/0ir6lvhxIDN4XcXiYyy7JE1t5JmrDyxy f4oMBH2DiZsrX4Yi84C6hoEBNUf5UtJhgWUc9BS61WrkSqnjbt2FMdA+PndFvrj6pyv4 oOrDs3qmKRI/MAGHwXBy7Fal0BmZd1tOi2zp831rxm+VabZ5DINEe25hNm7c8mnB9Bh4 CjAQ== Received: by 10.60.27.38 with SMTP id q6mr990729oeg.20.1336579357738; Wed, 09 May 2012 09:02:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.5.6] (dsl093-034-235.snd1.dsl.speakeasy.net. [66.93.34.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m2sm3065226obk.9.2012.05.09.09.02.36 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 May 2012 09:02:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FAA951F.2050001@brianwhalen.net> Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 09:02:39 -0700 From: Brian User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201205091503.q49F3xwH004097@mail.r-bonomi.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlWlaaUT6RGnkFO/x3Zrfn4Ig6PiikWf55wK4NM4kFX9qXZaHzw+w2yyNDdJkxnS4hcGjyd Subject: Re: User can't login but /etc/(master.)passwd OK X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 16:02:38 -0000 On 5/9/2012 8:08 AM, Michael Sierchio wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote: > >> "Details are *IMPORTANT*" > What's the user's shell in the password file, and does that shell: > exist? executable? In the /etc/shells file? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" The OP probably ought to look at /var/log files as well to see if anything is revealed there. Access can be denied for reasons other than passwords. BW From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 16:52:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13194106564A for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 16:52:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tvchannels@veryevilclowns.com) Received: from mail-gw5.njit.edu (mail-gw5.njit.edu [128.235.251.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C217C8FC0A for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 16:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beta.maestro.njit.edu (dhcp114-27.njit.edu [128.235.114.27]) by mail-gw5.njit.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q49GBfrU010342 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:11:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FAA96AF.6070702@veryevilclowns.com> Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 12:09:19 -0400 From: Tim K User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120507 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201205091503.q49F3xwH004097@mail.r-bonomi.com> <4FAA951F.2050001@brianwhalen.net> In-Reply-To: <4FAA951F.2050001@brianwhalen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: User can't login but /etc/(master.)passwd OK X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 16:52:07 -0000 On 05/09/12 12:02, Brian wrote: > On 5/9/2012 8:08 AM, Michael Sierchio wrote: >> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Robert >> Bonomi wrote: >> >>> "Details are *IMPORTANT*" >> What's the user's shell in the password file, and does that shell: >> exist? executable? In the /etc/shells file? >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > The OP probably ought to look at /var/log files as well to see if > anything is revealed there. Access can be denied for reasons other > than passwords. > > BW And a su -l [thatuser] as root would probably spit out some handy console messages right away. Tim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 20:15:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB9E106564A for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 20:15:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362B38FC0A for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 20:15:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SSDIO-00022M-3x for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 22:15:36 +0200 Received: from np-19-75.prenet.pl ([np-19-75.prenet.pl]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 22:15:36 +0200 Received: from jb.1234abcd by np-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 22:15:36 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jb Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 20:15:26 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <4FAA8B8E.2070506@marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0.2) Subject: Re: Questions on adaptive mutexes and trylock X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 20:15:39 -0000 Joe Marcus Clarke marcuscom.com> writes: > > The newest GLib (as well as PHP APC) is starting to use adaptive mutexes > in their code. When a mutex type is set to adaptive and you try to call > pthread_mutex_trylock() on it, you get back an EINVAL. Is this a bug, > or should this really be happening (the code clearly indicates adaptive > mutexes are not handled by trylock)? Adaptive mutex is a combination of a mutex and a spinlock with adjusted duration of spinning ("trylocking"). The primary purpose of a spinlock is to protect portions of the code that implement other synchronization primitives such as a mutex, etc. The pthread_mutex_trylock() attempts to acquire a lock on a mutex. It follows it is proper to deny direct access to (adaptive) mutex by pthread_mutex_trylock(). > I imagine Linux is not doing this since the code doesn't abort on Linux > as it does on FreeBSD. Should we be silently allowing trylock to > perform a no-op on adaptive mutexes, or should we be handling adaptive > mutexes with trylock? Thanks. I do not know why Linux handles it the way it does. jb From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 20:36:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232F7106567E for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 20:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joh.hendriks@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3B68FC0A for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 20:36:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eabm6 with SMTP id m6so317558eab.13 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 13:36:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=jydVgsk5wZnrLhjzcwmySzkxjaKrnQaZ0oxL0FBZ1LM=; b=QvAKVSauE/ku8A7lRFyqXf54twjkjBV7RJr/GYfp25t0Kd34MeW97tI8E+oqmRCA8k P5VginVlM5J5sItUoubfMCVhohMnZim6f8fTW92zYF/xdLfn+PvUHuKv+XvyUc15vkE7 kNNm8Fqq6q9IVE1yXz2S5/yayF/NNgphuDX3P9N/FD5yADzCHzYlQAjfmaDbB3fDAkyZ k43gX49Io7Z2nIlIMtVWp6HD6Bo0ZUE1n8nxNMq/hF8ob3p1NjOp/roAK8r8z6FkK7RA zS/Kv51W23eNch2U586TVtrghn8oDuhcFW16Ft0EmC9GnK/IS1PhPrATKvWGJLN9QJn9 ROBA== Received: by 10.213.7.66 with SMTP id c2mr896394ebc.37.1336595762458; Wed, 09 May 2012 13:36:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.17] (5ED0E470.cm-7-1d.dynamic.ziggo.nl. [94.208.228.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d18sm18071296eeb.7.2012.05.09.13.36.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 May 2012 13:36:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FAAD530.4020102@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 22:36:00 +0200 From: Johan Hendriks User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Graeme Dargie , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4C0F7421AA759346AF17299922AD57EBAEB382@Mercury.universe.galaxy.lcl> In-Reply-To: <4C0F7421AA759346AF17299922AD57EBAEB382@Mercury.universe.galaxy.lcl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Samba acting oddly. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 20:36:09 -0000 On 06-05-12 16:08, Graeme Dargie wrote: > I have a problem with Samba, well I "think" it is samba as one machine I have access to when I try to perform an action like create a new folder in my home folder windows spouts that I need permission and would I like to try again. > > I guess some background would be useful at this point, I have 3 FreeBSD machines that were running 8.2 AMD 64, some kind souls on this list were able to help me get Samba working using Active Directory, I upgraded to 9.0 when it became available and everything seemed to be fine. > > I happened to be needing to create a perl script that would allow two users to chat over a network, so rather than fiddling about with Linux and VM`s .. I just used two of my FreeBSD machines, this is when I noticed the issue. > > Only one machine shows this problem, the others let me happily create / delete stuff in the home folder other shares on the problematic machine are fine. > > The configuration files for all 3 machines is included below, but I just cannot seen to see why 2 work and 1 does as all three are running Samba35-3.5.6.2 so any help or pointers would be welcome. > > Regards > Graeme > > > > Machine Eris - samba works perfectly > > Smb.conf looks like this > [global] > workgroup = UNIVERSE > realm = UNIVERSE.GALAXY.LCL > netbiosname = ERIS > interfaces = re0 > security = ads > allow trusted domains = yes > > idmap uid = 5000-10000 > #idmap gid = 15000-20000 > winbind gid = 5000-10000 > template homedir = /usr/home/%U > template shell = /bin/csh > winbind cache time = 3600 > winbind nested groups = yes > winbind use default domain = yes > winbind separator = | > winbind enum users = yes > winbind enum groups = yes > winbind offline logon = yes > syslog only = Yes > socket options = SO_RCVBUF=131072 SO_SNDBUF=131072 TCP_NODELAY > use sendfile = yes > read raw = yes > use sendfile = yes > local master = no > use sendfile = yes > dns proxy = no > username map = /usr/local/samba/usermap > > # ACL Support > map acl inherit = yes > #acl group inherit = yes > acl group control = yes > > # LOGGING > log file = /var/log/samba/%m > log level = 1 > max log size = 1000 > syslog = 2 > ### recycle bin code > # bin > vfs object = recycle > recycle:repository = .RecycleBin/%U > recycle:keeptree = Yes > recycle:touch = Yes > recycle:versions = Yes > recycle:maxsize = 0 > recycle:exclude = *.tmp > recycle:exclude_dir = /tmp > recycle:noversions = *.ppt > > > [homes] > readonly=no > > > > > Machine Proteus - samba working a charm ... > [global] > > workgroup = UNIVERSE > realm = UNIVERSE.GALAXY.LCL > netbiosname = PROTEUS > interfaces = re0 > security = ads > allow trusted domains = yes > > idmap uid = 5000-10000 > #idmap gid = 15000-20000 > winbind gid = 5000-10000 > template homedir = /usr/home/%U > template shell = /bin/csh > winbind cache time = 3600 > winbind nested groups = yes > winbind use default domain = yes > winbind separator = | > winbind enum users = yes > winbind enum groups = yes > winbind offline logon = yes > syslog only = Yes > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=65536 SO_SNDBUF=65536 > use sendfile = yes > read raw = yes > use sendfile = yes > local master = no > use sendfile = yes > dns proxy = no > username map = /usr/local/samba/usermap > > # ACL Support > map acl inherit = yes > #acl group inherit = yes > acl group control = yes > > # LOGGING > log file = /var/log/samba/%m > log level = 1 > max log size = 1000 > syslog = 2 > > > [homes] > read only = No > > > Both of these work with no issues. > > However Amalthea which is the machine showing the problem, the smb.conf is the following > > [global] > workgroup = UNIVERSE > realm = UNIVERSE.GALAXY.LCL > netbiosname = amalthea > interfaces = nfe0 > security = ads > allow trusted domains = yes > > idmap uid = 5000-10000 > #idmap gid = 15000-20000 > winbind gid = 5000-10000 > template homedir = /usr/home/%U > template shell = /bin/csh > winbind cache time = 3600 > winbind nested groups = yes > winbind use default domain = yes > winbind separator = | > winbind enum users = yes > winbind enum groups = yes > winbind offline logon = yes > syslog only = Yes > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=65536 SO_SNDBUF=65536 > use sendfile = yes > read raw = yes > use sendfile = yes > local master = no > use sendfile = yes > dns proxy = no > username map = /usr/local/samba/usermap > > # ACL Support > map acl inherit = yes > #acl group inherit = yes > acl group control = yes > > # LOGGING > log file = /var/log/samba/%m > log level = 1 > max log size = 1000syslog = 2 > > ### recycle bin code > # bin > vfs object = recycle > recycle:repository = .RecycleBin/%U > recycle:keeptree = Yes > recycle:touch = Yes > recycle:versions = Yes > recycle:maxsize = 0 > recycle:exclude = *.tmp > recycle:exclude_dir = /tmp > recycle:noversions = *.ppt > > > [homes] > readonly=no > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" This is not the solution, but there are some things i notice. For starters, use sendfile = yes is 2 to 3 times in the config file, one time is enough. Secondly in the log section of the troubled system. log level = 1 max log size = 1000syslog = 2 Is this a typo else it should look like this. log level = 1 max log size = 1000 syslog = 2 what does the command testparm show on the machines? Does the command wbinfo -u show you the users? gr Johan Hendriks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 9 21:35:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085EC1065670 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 21:35:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37058FC08 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 21:35:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so1043664yhg.13 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 14:35:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=7fAHPmBFNWZYOBSQyLGB5it+/tZeQ6NdTr0NVIrePjY=; b=XW6UN/SvlhdOZAomfIK8/u2wvjOQ5O0U+c47GPnGFj4naorvXSDyXyYMCalUuoiUsg 7B+VYanVelXgJDRMUF6y9WlPtAUCB36fUVkutVGCciqqAm7LpcJwpDMauvX8DlZRC2/X Rfc0c124mPlqNkPAqE4EbwbeLmbfmJWGPNJh3NCYfK572H5KyFrrNcpEF5mBU+X1yuuk buzzgM/7jM/u0Fw+6dEfWmR9a6mM3A+R3DED75xTRufhuvPlV1pBlFcpkV4h59XWKhCG QZrT9kcoIEM66W75ZNBcU7NSArHgEy3vgRlzD8x1bgQEwdO8eFl4YzfQvkD1ojnSmB4H qqeA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.15.137 with SMTP id x9mr2407927igc.8.1336599303769; Wed, 09 May 2012 14:35:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.217.234 with HTTP; Wed, 9 May 2012 14:35:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 16:35:03 -0500 Message-ID: From: Antonio Olivares To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: djvu viewers from ports or add capability to view to xpdf, gv or other X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 21:35:05 -0000 Dear folks, How can I add the capability of viewing djvu files to say xpdf or gv without installing evince? Or is there a small djvu viewer available in ports that can be installed easily? Thanks, Antonio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 10 04:59:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E18106566B for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 04:59:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE908FC0C for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 04:59:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED20595D8; Thu, 10 May 2012 06:50:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q4A4nxXx001886; Thu, 10 May 2012 06:49:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 06:49:59 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Antonio Olivares Message-Id: <20120510064959.5d1fe5c6.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: djvu viewers from ports or add capability to view to xpdf, gv or other X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 04:59:07 -0000 On Wed, 9 May 2012 16:35:03 -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote: > Dear folks, > > How can I add the capability of viewing djvu files to say xpdf or gv > without installing evince? > > Or is there a small djvu viewer available in ports that can be installed easily? You can install the port "ImageMagick" with support for djvu format. To view a file, simply call "display ". Not tested. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 10 05:34:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7560C106566B for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 05:34:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 3pFGrTxYJAHciZrn-gZgjibVkkhVdg-XjhbhVdg.Xjh@M3KW2WVRGUFZ5GODRSRYTGD7.apphosting.bounces.google.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f200.google.com (mail-qc0-f200.google.com [209.85.216.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18438FC14 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 05:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcol42 with SMTP id l42so1888308qco.7 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 22:34:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:x-google-appengine-app-id:message-id:date :subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Du6Ted1W302ozJgn+grkMnlOXglgU8k6l9/Zmo4gS9I=; b=VcMibbf7Yn0Nf//1rkyOjJvTbQ17tBZV+TzBVw+rlrF8XGKG5pt21yhM0cdgsSNi+Y pHlwdDs2P1pM44J8mBP3HgeS/uMsYYeFkVg481gb31V44Fm5MhywK1RL0pHtHL5TnL2k 6yRV+JkA8HMl4GbGII5/9Fi7xtGG+QUc+HWVkQWWc3Lm04iYgmGMAWV5WU5ClvjTYwnf geFnX/3IsFAYme26Vvshg9lS08dcY4MqK6VLiTq4o0YJvMqJN5K1huHL7BzZ4wtwZMIY r1qXAelBW0qUgj+UuPzTQpIXVkNocOn8zKxgSpg+sl6xrhnEWeYW9gNvEmzD6LzLWkYb U/bQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.33.209 with SMTP id t17mr2258238vdi.0.1336627620269; Wed, 09 May 2012 22:27:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Appengine-App-Id: s~news-lelongappmail-com Message-ID: <20cf3079bd0a80d37504bfa7de59@google.com> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 05:27:00 +0000 From: Lelong Mailer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn8UXW67Ex0vLtM6cAimIcsHeNloMbwcHC1Hn6caLzd2uSuj9vKeJM+2NZrgTSMVxBG6wZl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Nasi Lemak Without Nasi? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lelong Mailer List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 05:34:28 -0000 You're receiving this newsletter because you subscribed from our website. Can't see the message? View it in browser. Come and join our Free Training Class! happy customer What our happy customer says: happy customer Tips of the day: "We like to thank you for your remarkable services and assistant to help us to grow our online business. Before we run our promotion/advertise in Lelong, our business no really doing so well and business volume is very small and inconsistent. However after we run our promotion in Lelong.com.my we can see remarkable improvement. Customer confidence to purchase product from us via Lelong and at the same time customer also been introduced to our company website. Now the customer is comfortable to order and re-order from us, and very frequent too. Currently 40% of our sales channel from lelong.com.my, we love to see more and more new feature from Lelong that can plugin into our store and can make the purchase process become more and more simplified. Keep on the good job." Jack Lee allfix.com.my (Malaysia First Online Hardware Store) special promotions 7 Reasons to Start an E-Commerce Business (Part Time or Full Time) Owning a business can be emotionally fulfilling and financial enriching. Tens of thousands of new ventures are started each year. E-Commerce businesses frequently require less capital and less time to start than brick and mortal retail or services operation. So why not get going? Certainly starting an online business is not without its trials and pitfalls. But for every reason someone could name not to start a new ecommerce-based business, there are plenty of good reasons to go ahead. What follows is a simple list of seven reasons to start an ecommerce business. Want to know more? Read more in Lelong Education page Upcoming Activity: Previous Activity: May 2012 ( Damansara Campus) If you wish us to drop by to your University or College, email us at edu@lelong.com.my Penang Education Tour Our Education Tour to Penang on 5 - 6 May 2012! Also View ALL Picture Gallery Come and join our Free Training Class! Seats are limited. We would love to hear from you! Don't hesitate to call us at 017-686 4568 / 017-686 1522 for any enquiries! Powered by Lelong.my You are receiving this e-mail because you are in our mailing list. If you do not wish to receive further newsletters, you may unsubscribe by clicking Here From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 10 10:09:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E299106564A for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 10:09:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3857C8FC17 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 10:09:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.11] ([192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q4AA9qES087656; Thu, 10 May 2012 06:09:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 06:09:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Hill To: Polytropon In-Reply-To: <20120510064959.5d1fe5c6.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: References: <20120510064959.5d1fe5c6.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Antonio Olivares Subject: Re: djvu viewers from ports or add capability to view to xpdf, gv or other X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 10:09:58 -0000 On Thu, 10 May 2012, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2012 16:35:03 -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote: >> Dear folks, >> >> How can I add the capability of viewing djvu files to say xpdf or gv >> without installing evince? >> >> Or is there a small djvu viewer available in ports that can be >> installed easily? > > You can install the port "ImageMagick" with support for djvu > format. To view a file, simply call "display ". Not tested. Be aware that ImageMagick is the opposite of small. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 10 12:14:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2EA106566C for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 12:14:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s19.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s19.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80ADB8FC15 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 12:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP135 ([65.55.111.135]) by blu0-omc4-s19.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 10 May 2012 05:14:03 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [76.182.104.150] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([76.182.104.150]) by BLU0-SMTP135.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 10 May 2012 05:14:02 -0700 Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3VpCyw6BvGz2CG5v for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 08:14:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 08:14:00 -0400 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD Followup-To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEUAAABYRlwJCw4FAgAIBwKprDkBAQFQLR0BAgCir7VRttp8AAACAUlEQVQ4jZWUTYvbMBCGTVl8V2hX6Gg5G5FbWQdBj0lEfE7BhN4cyzi5Wt1E5L70roWy6N92xok/skkP+5IYrMcz78xIduDWpNM3vFzuA/jX5EY1AI6KHFwW/CzFuQAwqUBbV12p+CzIh6Awq7sg33pn5D64SQXAexffeuQlA/L35RrkaB551OjGfP/cAO8mCNaDcgvfky5ijoD0pAXlCQCnljiAjsJD9Ax05Ko5sZxbnLQcmM+dZg5IjREfZrWIHK0JuwU68pAGwHvfRxBundRzTxxz3r9dNUikPsEihjz2Dc4kjp1hKsJGuot4EDxaxzMoC7XqhxhOSfZrTS6gSX1JVdjp+o1PvWfekXgw3WL0g70nDEwA0H0HQsEZc8sTmFMTkWUfYWC/vdR1zQy3xLQgLwzu90QnlnFLjeiGWBjwhb4Sa42IqOg2qqS4O1/zhKokFUb1Q8Rj4Eb69WVflXEehJ35DgChVTE5n50eaGyMLOfH8AOodoSM4PVYAQgQdBulOa+knklYks3vAuQ+uX492lTl+A+e8qBV2AKoXalVKFfyuUp0pUp1ARaUHh82lv9MN+Ig7CZtgE6FNYvjlywT2VP2dMgOG46gTIWcqdfvuwyXNz0oMJNd/N5lh1YNiJt19ADTUo3VuFSNeQwVqRSrGjSCp53fk2g+Mvfk/gfoPxHeUS8MH9vRAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2012 12:14:02.0215 (UTC) FILETIME=[62E3AF70:01CD2EA6] Subject: Problem with npviewer.bin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 12:14:03 -0000 I am continuing to have a problem with certain "flash" videos not displaying with Firefox on FreeBSD-8.3. I have discovered numerous messages like this in the system log file. May 10 07:59:04 scorpio kernel: linux: pid 96942 (npviewer.bin): syscall pipe2 not implemented I have also discovered: npviewer.bin.core files in my HOME directory. Is there something that I can do to correct this problem? -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 10 12:26:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624C7106564A for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 12:26:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B91A8FC0C for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 12:26:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.113.98.52] (helo=tiny.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SSRos-0000PO-CA for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 13:46:06 +0200 Received: from tiny.Sisis.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q4ABk4nD001667 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 13:46:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q4ABk34q001666 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 10 May 2012 13:46:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: tiny.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 13:46:03 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120510114602.GA1643@tiny> References: <20110725151047.GA8701@sh4-5.1blu.de> <20120409170659.GA4608@tinyCurrent> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20120409170659.GA4608@tinyCurrent> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r226986 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 82.113.98.52 Subject: Re: keyboard latency from time to time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 12:26:54 -0000 El día Monday, April 09, 2012 a las 07:06:59PM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió: > Months later, in some other issue, I learned about the feature of KDE > "slow keys" and what I have described is exactly the same behaviour and > I can now even reproduce this with just pressing and holding down the > Shift-key for around 8 secs; when it happens one must go to the KDE > Control Center and activate 'slow keys' (yes, they are not shown as > activated in this moment) and deactivate 'slow keys' again, and all is > fine. I was curious and digged deeper into this... "slow keys" is part of the X11 XKB-protocol (details in XKBproto.pdf or XkbGetSlowKeysDelay(3) man page; in the ports there is ports/x11/xkbset utility and with this one can set the "Slowkeys acceptance delay" (time in ms the X server awaits a key is hold down before sending out the keypress event) or to switch it off again: $ xkbset slowkeys 500 # to switch in on and set 500ms delay $ xkbset -slowkeys # to switch it off again HIH matthias -- Matthias Apitz e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 10 12:48:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898E81065674 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 12:48:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158CA8FC17 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 12:48:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhr2 with SMTP id hr2so356186wib.13 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 05:48:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=N3blaItbrUiP6zS9NBzk1WydYDE3hN83YSSVy/FzKLY=; b=GwH8lDP4LHLYbVWnUEpC4l7jL5NqmNZaLxFk8tFUXXRH2q0eMwn2FkmPx4umoCaCP/ 1Wb1KsWR35RAH6QsY/RPCe+z3OmIbZgDxW/IQL7dzPWKs/6QN3OIe2DrNx7zHswGrti0 qKpqzKmGo9HIHoKhrZzr8SOxiMD5/TpPDuaDM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=N3blaItbrUiP6zS9NBzk1WydYDE3hN83YSSVy/FzKLY=; b=b2sZFpLc5qirBnV1IK+YBvainfJfJ1Nfr/5Y3gKMMMsjujS9rFRrvophpmADIghAc+ gro+JBaHJuHcZry6yKsjac2t9cAkYc7VKKhe4r66gdzN5hVoZNoQ2OKb2vQF9KHQ8Yv/ WlnreG/6SS5wKEmymHIj9cU5/0EkcnAl+rmX2jQuimd9K+/smIEq9e368ALSS7/q3xyk 6xuzjiAnbTTG18P0g28AYOGzXXpi0g3Mwfysl8u99e4G6jgBS/vC6PWZlwRPE1WMdS/M wHVTDE1rjzSjsHAQ17Md6WWHYoEGHJUtSLGQ0DqV84vJLrLnEGXLdaSDGgy+Sb6+xLcj hekQ== Received: by 10.180.84.4 with SMTP id u4mr9301841wiy.2.1336654106044; Thu, 10 May 2012 05:48:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.120.6 with HTTP; Thu, 10 May 2012 05:47:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Eitan Adler Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 08:47:55 -0400 Message-ID: To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnIdq422DASYKm9jiAhik9nfgmxLJ94QQaPq81A2CFcgYzbg5msjeZJcFvs7sOltcN2+9hI Subject: Re: Problem with npviewer.bin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 12:48:27 -0000 On 10 May 2012 08:14, Carmel wrote: > I am continuing to have a problem with certain "flash" videos not > displaying with Firefox on FreeBSD-8.3. > > I have discovered numerous messages like this in the system log file. > > May 10 07:59:04 scorpio kernel: linux: pid 96942 (npviewer.bin): syscall pipe2 not implemented > > I have also discovered: npviewer.bin.core files in my HOME directory. > > Is there something that I can do to correct this problem? Which version of flash are you using? -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 10 14:04:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351A9106566C for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 14:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B958FC08 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 14:04:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn19 with SMTP id hn19so460581wib.13 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 07:04:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=OclP0RJrAaSkjMpF5JXNMUQ1GC44bcse2v6KW+DzmRw=; b=wOl7JXcNGU5F6ThRc3ExQAsbsY2yUCo8llK1vXSyzf1K+qp+i1tm73IXqilczRb1M/ y+/758bFkkoXq3ElDe8d3mc6L7FvZzdKKbjPbN15hawsaLBc0TWFnBMoIOmlk029cEQu jWsLrUZpY5nuAWQm137HcusDvVOJTEojnNVK3Xj/Ta3xNiD6nAWz97ELKWbsOeljchAn nk1J4EBLnIHsUoQYWf7Msj1Ak6rmPJsSyJMCOQC2HtAcKY8ak2oOXLouge7LPCMekGjs UIYdv9ZElVsap7cP2gjlJzclHen1Azsxt8Ruj4AmFQGLQnzJQcXnoWnzpISeftLw3QAn rVig== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.15.137 with SMTP id x9mr3927511igc.8.1336658656456; Thu, 10 May 2012 07:04:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.217.234 with HTTP; Thu, 10 May 2012 07:04:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120510064959.5d1fe5c6.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 09:04:16 -0500 Message-ID: From: Antonio Olivares To: Chris Hill Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Polytropon , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: djvu viewers from ports or add capability to view to xpdf, gv or other X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 14:04:43 -0000 On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Chris Hill wrote: > On Thu, 10 May 2012, Polytropon wrote: > >> On Wed, 9 May 2012 16:35:03 -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote: >>> >>> Dear folks, >>> >>> How can I add the capability of viewing djvu files to say xpdf or gv >>> without installing evince? >>> >>> Or is there a small djvu viewer available in ports that can be installed >>> easily? >> >> >> You can install the port "ImageMagick" with support for djvu >> format. To view a file, simply call "display ". Not tested. > > > Be aware that ImageMagick is the opposite of small. > > -- I have successfully installed djview4, but it also pulled in qt stuff. I have imagemagick installed, but I did not compile in djvu support :( I had a gut feeling that viewers like gv or xpdf would have the capability to view djvu files, since evince could do this, but I guess I was wrong. Thanks to both of you for your responses. Best Regards, Antonio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 10 14:14:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A872106564A for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 14:14:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C488FC19 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 14:14:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967D327697; Thu, 10 May 2012 16:14:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q4AEETNx007753; Thu, 10 May 2012 16:14:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 16:14:29 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Antonio Olivares Message-Id: <20120510161429.dd7008cf.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20120510064959.5d1fe5c6.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: djvu viewers from ports or add capability to view to xpdf, gv or other X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 14:14:33 -0000 On Thu, 10 May 2012 09:04:16 -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote: > I had a gut feeling that viewers like gv or xpdf would have the > capability to view djvu files, since evince could do this, but I guess > I was wrong. As far as I know, the ability to deal with this file formate requires the corresponding library to be used. Evince seems to be able to, but xpdf and gv are "just PS/PDF viewers", so this functionality hasn't been incorporated. Even though ImageMagic is a "heavy chunk of compiling", it is acceptably easy to use when installed ("display" command). Enabling DJVU option and recompiling it shouldn't pull too many dependencies into the system. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 10 14:27:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187601065676; Thu, 10 May 2012 14:27:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F8C8FC0A; Thu, 10 May 2012 14:27:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=5Ua4XRhn3/NsMP69DwbnLcXqFU9/XHaKfP518z+Z2zo=; b=QP5P2cTqv2Lqt5VrnlRI/iapotpe15Audz+VaCA4w6yp5R9NbYok408fHvMdrIKTGV9WS3WrwU25tGNHLAdijLGF5965h4eqrLUrR3T1wozYmsma57NZMK1ExqfgSJav; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1SSUKb-000L6t-Cs; Thu, 10 May 2012 09:27:07 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1336660015-1570-1568/5/35; Thu, 10 May 2012 14:26:55 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 09:26:54 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.62 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Please help me diagnose this crazy VMWare/FreeBSD 8.x crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 14:27:08 -0000 Quick update: I have received word last night that this crash has been consistently happening to someone on FreeBSD 9 and they're looking for more ideas. I changed the following 41 days ago: - Video memory to "auto" if it wasn't already - SCSI controller changed from LSI Logic Parallel to LSI Logic SAS It uses the same driver (da) but so far has been holding steady for us. As far as the video memory -- many of our servers somehow had video memory set to 1MB which seemed strange; newer builds of FreeBSD on ESXi do not show this option. Perhaps there was a build of ESXi in the past that had a different setting for video memory when you selected FreeBSD? Another change people might want to do as suggested to us by VMWare Support: - Change CPU/MMU Virtualization to the bottom option -- "Use Intel VTx/AMD-V for instruction set virtualization and Intel EPT / AMD RVI for MMU virtualization" Supposedly there are autodetection issues here with some OSes -- they named some BSDs and Netware. I'll provide further updates if anything changes, but this seems to be working well so far. We won't begin to trust it until we can hit at least 100 days of uptime, though. Unfortunately I was hoping to upgrade these servers to 8.3 before then... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 10 17:21:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03537106566B for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 17:21:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomdean@speakeasy.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80298FC17 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 17:21:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.42]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA413C818C for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 13:21:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 4293 invoked from network); 10 May 2012 17:21:55 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 22982, pid: 5658, t: 0.1775s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 spam: 3.0.4 Received: from 24-113-107-31.wavecable.com (HELO [192.168.2.3]) (tomdean@[24.113.107.31]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 10 May 2012 17:21:55 -0000 Message-ID: <4FABF938.7000706@speakeasy.org> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 10:22:00 -0700 From: tomdean User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on mail3.sea5 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=8.0 tests=RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=disabled version=3.0.4 Subject: Lost Boot Sector X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 17:21:57 -0000 FreeBSD AMD64 9-stable up-to-data as of a week ago. ASUS P9X79 motherboard. (OC 4.2GHz) I have 4 SATA disks. (disk 0)500G windows 7 plus a (disk 1)windows mirror, (disk 2)500G FreeBSD, (disk 3)160G backup. I need windows for .NET, Gadgeteer, and uM-FPU. (otherwise, ... hot rock) Windows stabbed a disk, I think. After using windows, the next AM, I found the system with a US cursor on a black background. When I booted with BIOS selector, I saw a windows update message go by. The windows 7 disk, (disk 0) is not recognized by windows 7 after booting disk 1 via BIOS and selecting 'windows 7 secondary plex'. So, either disk 0 died or windows stabbed it (not unheard of). I was using grub from an old linux installation. Disk 2 is not bootable from BIOS - it tries but I get a running '#', forever. I booted the FreeBSD 9.0 RC2 live CD. FreeBSD (disk 2) is still there (whew!) and looks intact. disk 2 GPT: 0 GPT (456G) 1 linux-data (93G) debian??? 2 linux-swap (29G) 3 FreeBSD-boot (64k) 4 FreeBSD-ufs (338G) 5 FreeBSD-swap (4G) <== I need to increase this to 16G (== RAM) - free (847M) I plan to use BIOS boot, with FreeBSD as the default - no more auto boot windows! disconnect all disks except (disk 2) - it will appear in BIOS as P0. boot the 9.0 RC2 live CD if pmbr and gptboot are on (disk 2) use those files, else use the live CD files # gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptboot -i 3 /dev/ada0 I think this puts pmbr on (disk 2) boot sector and gptboot on partition 3. Will this make the disk bootable? And boot FreeBSD when selected from BIOS? With only the windows 7 secondary plex disk connected, it boots. Tom Dean From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 10 18:39:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58A2106566C for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 18:39:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomdean@speakeasy.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940F48FC15 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 18:39:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.42]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD4AA709D8 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 14:39:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 6732 invoked from network); 10 May 2012 18:39:42 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 2610, pid: 6725, t: 0.1850s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 spam: 3.0.4 Received: from 24-113-107-31.wavecable.com (HELO [192.168.2.3]) (tomdean@[24.113.107.31]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 10 May 2012 18:39:42 -0000 Message-ID: <4FAC0B6C.6000205@speakeasy.org> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 11:39:40 -0700 From: tomdean User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4FABF938.7000706@speakeasy.org> In-Reply-To: <4FABF938.7000706@speakeasy.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on mail3.sea5 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=8.0 tests=RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=disabled version=3.0.4 Subject: Re: Lost Boot Sector - SOLVED X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 18:39:43 -0000 On 5/10/2012 10:22 AM, tomdean wrote: > > > # gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptboot -i 3 /dev/ada0 > This restored the disk to bootable state. Tom Dean From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 10 18:52:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD23F1065672 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 18:52:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjuanino@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481798FC0A for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 18:52:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eeke49 with SMTP id e49so432827eek.13 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 11:52:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:x-operating-system:user-agent; bh=yPgFWhHg7YEJTG3cKEN6IlxsQm71Gz31aUmjTGMcGEo=; b=hLPskVtlgqYShdI/kpY7IXMYEZmkJwXoJgluF+jBXzP6PdUYo2k/orYAf8stD/HJdk nOpRK3/EkOfBeW6G7D9ZEOlDxw6EUN6wJ4eh0ZO8ZtL5SiQarWx8J79ad5sBdeY+f+GZ ft8d4+O948GpwujZoyM56OobkBs9hTyCp5mGMHtoBJsYSSUmOradoBLaU7lL+nibEf7f vKg/fiyoQBAJGoBhLio0UcMfKXIclaEwFxJ44YsHIhVJEifzPUOE26Q17WtIJFHRMcVP j35OkZo1/a74+Jo3XVOAf7JpGkDaTwxJIulSeho/LsseyN3xltL32tQIiqRKgqfsbv2i z3mA== Received: by 10.213.104.132 with SMTP id p4mr1317509ebo.77.1336675959155; Thu, 10 May 2012 11:52:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from banach (59.Red-83-34-14.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net. [83.34.14.59]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f16sm33052770eec.2.2012.05.10.11.52.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 10 May 2012 11:52:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 20:52:34 +0200 From: Jose Garcia Juanino To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120510185233.GA2759@banach> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5" Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Panic in FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE after reload mountd to export for NFS an UFS snapshot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 18:52:40 -0000 --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi, Today I have got a panic under the following scenario: * FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE in VMWare ESXi virtualized host * Very busy host (java compilers, NFS server, lot of UFS snapshots) * apache web server * pgsql and mysql databases * GENERIC kernel The panic happened after: 1- to umount a UFS snapshot mount point 2- to mount other similar UFS snapshot (with snapshot mount /fs:tag /mountpoint) 3- Update /etc/exports to include the previous /mountpoint 4- service mountd reload The crash dump is here: http://www.mipaginapersonal.movistar.es/web3/jjuanino/core.txt.0 Please keep me in CC: Best regards --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+sDnEACgkQFOo0zaS9RnIo8gCgjHenePZZ+v1ZO4i2Ck7uNlzh suAAoJlKTItetn7IoJ9G4g1CCM+z349a =tF8B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 10 22:45:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D261065782 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 22:45:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A1A8FC16 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 22:45:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl8 with SMTP id l8so2674093yen.13 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 15:45:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=87OeHC5S4dI7Gdg3MbOLCSoXOO8/2+Gf817GgpKFL0U=; b=olrsKH7w4kaYsMlmjEVo9xZE37BMbtt7igKXZoVSqtu9/1qrXv+4bV9+Ixmc/U/RMp hhfsF94J/ZCjzcLAXWMTkA9iyivlmLnrLAnfWDh2fQIlBT7SKbHXlBuQZxDIU051f6/q eATeJiBPFwIpZl0iTfwpTiFWQxcHncXxZYCXs8QtvMtIpLUSZnjT81sA17AMLsOPU7y1 C3KVUEtja8v34fIsbQSGUcdXFvOW5bQzvBMhmi/FeCbJe4kiaSTC/drVqUQO8N88IPjM WhbJMdqkhVkjc969iuyuwQCR8j6WEV80dOVNEtNROyVkpZKkRhevf0wD7DQ1VD+8OGSn SmfQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.88.199 with SMTP id bi7mr422154igb.26.1336689934620; Thu, 10 May 2012 15:45:34 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.231.74.138 with HTTP; Thu, 10 May 2012 15:45:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201205010558.q415wAFu091478@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <201205010558.q415wAFu091478@mail.r-bonomi.com> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 18:45:34 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: c6nF7lk_eD93F52Fs0s6Tk1xqLI Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: Robert Bonomi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm5E7Fg0PmqtgXymliPzJvjiE/Qk6l3FjRVSLLplPCmI56V1speOmJfUbIig75nxDJ8Sh4+ Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 22:45:36 -0000 On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Robert Bonomi wr= ote: > [...] > Reading _both_ of McKusick's =A0"Design of .." books, and the 'Unix Syste= m > Admininstration Handbook', by Nemeth, et al. =A0is a good _start_. > I just bought the FreeBSD one only unless there is a reason I should read the older 4.4BSD ? Regarding Nemeth's I am undecided between the 4th (Unix & Linux) or the 3rd. Please advise. Thanks, --=20 Alejandro Imass > Having a bunch of the books from O'Reilley & Assoc. (= ), > especially for 'standard' tools that you need to get the most out of, is > also highly recommended. > > Disclaimer: =A0I know a lot of the authors of those books, persoally. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 11 01:23:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F63E106564A for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 01:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eam1edward@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD6B8FC08 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 01:23:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so3355625obc.13 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 18:23:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lQt8ds1LiAjwmG6qmJnGo0dRlYo/VEmNSYxqY5hjpSU=; b=c2BszOAvdL9znDB86hnBHezco8nfFNe+gyrGRcntQSwKXq1NOQr61kzTYWh6DlVllL 1fnNduBBjyZZ83QWqcvpxLFgZTJvSOk08RNv43mh1dljFsDzI9C6aPy8dvvAcOrGPpQF Ks75QPhTb3nTbArsYHxAZXTZjWWUwk6VdIz/FgLVol1Ks3Z413HqSHTP+hw06zoxQu2Z qySasbWvTQY14WhMaZnWr3/hWWGo6ivUd9siu3UdRiDKLcBw1F9Jc/b0WXDzCPSBb+Zi MqQIEJN3dFa30ydP7OzPd0+iURJSR8NP3SGKyTTLompXZIbwBJX4p2OkP1cy57Vb2AKj 1q3A== Received: by 10.182.31.102 with SMTP id z6mr8825941obh.78.1336699411793; Thu, 10 May 2012 18:23:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([174.134.109.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ch5sm7953130obb.16.2012.05.10.18.23.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 10 May 2012 18:23:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FAC6B61.5060604@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 18:29:05 -0700 From: Edward M User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201205010558.q415wAFu091478@mail.r-bonomi.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 01:23:32 -0000 On 05/10/2012 03:45 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > Regarding Nemeth's I am undecided between the 4th (Unix& Linux) or > the 3rd. Please advise. i purchased the third edition because I took a look in the 4th the table of contents and it appears anything FreeBSD related was remove and it only focuses on: Solaris Linux( red hat ubuntu) and AIX. However third edition mentions BSDs table of contents of 4th edition. http://www.amazon.com/Linux-System-Administration-Handbook-Edition/dp/0131480057/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1336698969& sr=1-1#reader_0131480057 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 11 07:01:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07E0106564A for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 07:01:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christer.solskogen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5838FC0A for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 07:01:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so2976588yhg.13 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 00:01:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=SqM4v0nJ1jizcIvEJ7Tz79eW1Npsqo6FZrslf2RhqPg=; b=tgSkKrBlZrcDrGAnalrRWxn53mWUxyZQLGm1HSu2j8rmrjWEz3rhL5ccZkEU4PAGT/ +bjN4btfCruPdId16Lk4Cy26TWJOmQZJc4HSBNsQctQulhcqlHSnw4CEzkF7Lz4y6Ll3 +TDOxSJXJvvXBtF57bfKd+xrAZaHSn1UaH+PA/5n6o6cUS2p1BKabWc6FAYHQUvCWG2t 7UiNup1mIDsg+GlHpBtlkF2IUuSKqizviLK5J+gz9uddYpO+sPUAizHZJL59NX/4A90n wiPei5BRV/li+mRIN1YbwrO7IYn26X1KdpDfeZmsmtF+OAFDZpsjEg/JcB4epRxeeZAR GiOQ== Received: by 10.50.183.225 with SMTP id ep1mr1537659igc.1.1336719713755; Fri, 11 May 2012 00:01:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.67.233 with HTTP; Fri, 11 May 2012 00:01:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Christer Solskogen Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 09:01:33 +0200 Message-ID: To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: newfs on a SSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 07:01:55 -0000 After years of waiting for a decent price on one of these I finally got one. The questions is, which options should I use on a SSD that will be / on my system. I see that newfs supports TRIM, so that will be turned on, but should I use journaling? gjournal? softupdates? soft updates journaling? I'm confused :) -- chs, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 11 08:45:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D23106566B for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 08:45:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681C98FC0C for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 08:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl8 with SMTP id l8so3076333yen.13 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 01:45:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=V3rmwzKRNmx31GJxpsITbLX1r4irudqeXBf8/cy5/JQ=; b=hIX8cGm6RMBCe3/HZSEw0IH1d83cBwsEVYDO+Hs2OW0sQkAikemvsB5ke6YQ4N9Cj5 FfPX3YR2JH7rxuQPTajapJtiIZBKLLbaGBcSsges8UWaI4vkgTZQa4CzOk/Xb61Etx4f Ng5vY/S93C127q6tmzZEGeM+5KzNyxhqvFMzMsgVae+7r7nV14ToGwUPIRz3V3xIMp19 OwMpMNT7FeCxkVXTCeB6DOTj0CsmcK2K4zqcBWAg89V9eIZKs2HINQgzd8wa/haVVPMw MDQzb9mIbGbGh34WtrFHnHVBAG+zdXV5iKwnw6mmNbQbKmgHMixezVb+VODmOpdWLP+T goBg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.158.161 with SMTP id wv1mr1124166igb.43.1336725908519; Fri, 11 May 2012 01:45:08 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.231.74.138 with HTTP; Fri, 11 May 2012 01:45:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FAC6B61.5060604@gmail.com> References: <201205010558.q415wAFu091478@mail.r-bonomi.com> <4FAC6B61.5060604@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 04:45:08 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: CVmg-Yo3ndEwIFq4WSxF1fQdmCc Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: Edward M Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn4xVT9L0vPtU9m/aWudch3pwtRnMWP9n4DEvBWkSqSQ49CLuzIlpV9PV2tBia4UNtVEmZh Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 08:45:12 -0000 On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Edward M wrote: > On 05/10/2012 03:45 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: >> >> Regarding Nemeth's I am undecided between the 4th (Unix& =A0Linux) or >> the 3rd. Please advise. > > > =A0 =A0i purchased the third edition because I took a look =A0in the 4th = the table > of contents > =A0 =A0 and it appears =A0anything =A0 FreeBSD related =A0 was remove and= it only > focuses on: Solaris > =A0 =A0Linux( red hat ubuntu) and AIX. However third edition mentions BSD= s > Yep, agreed. 3rd edition it is. Thanks, --=20 Alejandro Imass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 11 09:18:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D819106564A for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 09:18:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-gg0-f182.google.com (mail-gg0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8DF58FC19 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 09:18:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnm2 with SMTP id m2so2054506ggn.13 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 02:18:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=fqp5cVM5U2aXNJEK60if31Bq7SE52jCS84szMPy2Uik=; b=ESj/n/szw9cfMvxnbAflmIrkwd7Lyb70MPHZE71Sqb78rprED8q3w53BgoSySOh5ih ROafPejp1xCv5BxlfdyGZEfZbAxlGMDILTifZGvzj88B3jix8QjfoijviPVQ6OTI+KhL wWiM85nVNABmObdvZoiqXEWidNUvPJZ/ejWj2DkaHHcIN+zS4VIoHG5VLlAqriQ0LFmk DfTccOTJBXe274AwdfP1iNi3NhWZ+mQwH9R98vvOI5pNYD7SOwPEXz6KfsRJAib2VnI/ vWXCW0THL4tWNj3lYHvPDtLm9U4VllTRr6hlwmggK56sDsTjXkftpRvUNei6oFCgXMaU 5qQQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.142.71 with SMTP id r7mr3914035icu.7.1336727897184; Fri, 11 May 2012 02:18:17 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.231.74.138 with HTTP; Fri, 11 May 2012 02:18:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120509154807.b6e9ee4e.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <201205091953.28091.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> <20120509154807.b6e9ee4e.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 05:18:16 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: I3Bv_YWp-ZvQO0tdeP6B0jNHKM0 Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlgYYAq3srKST5byDU5G5flWdw9mqlpDF5UOkeyUbjG0dMHZBBbW+BetyRMqgil5iivce5r Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 09:18:19 -0000 On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2012 09:30:37 -0400, Alejandro Imass wrote: >> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Erich Dollansky >> wrote: >> >> For your recommendation above, what are the advantages or differences >> >> of slicing the disk versus partitioning on a single slice? >> >> >> > it could be a misunderstanding. What is a partition? What is a slice. = I have to look always into the handbook. Anyway, as long the OS see differe= nt units which have to be mounted independent of each other, it all does no= t matter what is what. >> > >> >> I meant in Unix terms of course. Slice is slice (partition in other >> OS) and partition a thru h >> >> The question is if it has any advantage of using a slice to mount the >> basejail in RO as opposed to doing the same thing on a partition. > > The answer is: It it not possible. :-) > > You cannot mount a slice. > > Given the BSD terminology: A slice _has_ to contain partitions. > You cannot format a slice, you can only format partitions. A > formatted partition carries a UFS file system. (However, it's > possible to omit the slice, and partition the whole disk instead, > this is called "dedicated mode"). A third method is formatting > the whole disk ("the 'c' device"), in that case the 'c' is omitted. > > The _only_ time you can mount a slice is when it is used in its > common meaning, being a "DOS primary partition"; in this case, > a FAT or NTFS file system will be placed directly into a slice, > as those do not support any (BSD-style) partitioning. > > /dev/ad0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-> the disk > /dev/ad0s1 =A0 =A0 =A0-> 1st slice > /dev/ad0s1a =A0 =A0 -> 1st partition on 1st slice > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 THIS is something you can mount. > -or- > /dev/ad0a =A0 =A0 =A0 -> 1st partition on disk ("dedicated") > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 THIS can also be mounted. > -or- > /dev/ad0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-> the whole disk (equals /dev/ad0c) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Even THIS can be mounted. > > In case I'm misunderstanding your question, could you alter the > expression? > Thanks. The question was more advantages of a single slice + single partition versus a slice and multiple partitions, for mounting the EzJail basejail in RO mode. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 11 10:48:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25AAB106566B for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 10:48:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from four.troublesome.heads@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F848FC14 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 10:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbon10 with SMTP id n10so2482267lbo.13 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 03:48:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=h5WFk6p+e5mVePYl7ybmspE6OsQlUaESV/QlSMiba0g=; b=s9oM4DDu5/iRYzEyDSzEjZoS7ebRNNpX/Cs4WMXNdKWL18TzIMDgxh8jgU8X5JuvsZ F4VlzBNx4TAPrmmQvB78L7FPt86KzXn/S8kqFDaHE/IzN3uVGQP9abIMQhSaV1lz5UUA PFSUNQyq+2bvXYRvQdIQ5+sN42bYUMA5pU2Rs1zSwZTKhZiz4qhe4X7pNgnDRxElpxlW co5mfQmoRYz/cmZJjqiKmdkAiKJCY3pPVTshtgObBotP0BMjKgIItSk6MEDAvOAmflVV 5E5dZD2dUP28gt5YIDUiDUcvJeIL/IxYanfBLIu1K34kEK3r3YcWQaSliIQ07dEW0PT+ I0Og== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.112.161 with SMTP id ir1mr7898338lab.13.1336733319220; Fri, 11 May 2012 03:48:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.96.36 with HTTP; Fri, 11 May 2012 03:48:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 19:48:39 +0900 Message-ID: From: fake fake To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Firefox will not start X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 10:48:41 -0000 $firefox returns this: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozsqlite3.so: Undefined symbol "posix_fallocate" It seems failed to link, but how to solve this? ==== System Information==== FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE amd64 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 11 12:28:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7DB106566B; Fri, 11 May 2012 12:28:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s25.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s25.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F398FC14; Fri, 11 May 2012 12:28:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP200 ([65.55.111.135]) by blu0-omc4-s25.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 11 May 2012 05:28:48 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [76.182.104.150] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([76.182.104.150]) by BLU0-SMTP200.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 11 May 2012 05:28:47 -0700 Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3VprFT5drjz2CG46; Fri, 11 May 2012 08:28:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 08:28:45 -0400 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 May 2012 12:28:47.0417 (UTC) FILETIME=[9CEC8A90:01CD2F71] Cc: itetcu@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem with SSL ans "net/sendemail" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 12:28:49 -0000 Error message: invalid SSL_version specified at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.2/IO/Socket/SSL.pm line 308 This is generated by the "sendEmail" program. The "net/sendemail" port compiled with SSL support. make showconfig ===> The following configuration options are available for sendEmail-1.56: SSL=on "Enable SSL support" This was working fine until today. This all started after a reboot of the system. ssh -V OpenSSH_5.4p1_hpn13v11 FreeBSD-20100308, OpenSSL 0.9.8q 2 Dec 2010 openssl version OpenSSL 1.0.1a 19 Apr 2012 It appears I have two different versions of OpenSSL installed. I deliberately installed the newer version and placed this in the "/etc/make.conf" file: WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes I have no idea what happened or how to correct this problem. I tried rebuilding Perl and the two ports listed in the "sendemail" port and the "sendemail" port itself without a satisfactory result. By the way, I noticed that "OpenSSH 6.0" was released April 22, 2012. Are there any plans to get that into the ports system, or better yet, replace the aging base system? -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 11 14:11:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A571065678 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 14:11:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7FC48FC19 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 14:11:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (c80-217-70-175.bredband.comhem.se [80.217.70.175]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q4BEBCHx013701; Fri, 11 May 2012 16:11:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <4FAD1DC0.1090806@bananmonarki.se> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 16:10:08 +0200 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120411 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fake fake References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox will not start X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 14:11:21 -0000 2012-05-11 12:48, fake fake skrev: > $firefox > returns this: > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozsqlite3.so: > Undefined symbol "posix_fallocate" > > It seems failed to link, but how to solve this? > > ==== System Information==== > FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE > amd64 Reinstall sqlite3. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 11 17:47:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F6A106577E for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 17:47:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy1.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53B1D8FC12 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 17:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23022 invoked by uid 0); 11 May 2012 17:47:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by oproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 11 May 2012 17:47:28 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apotheon.com; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=eIz3aJ0kNoVBPgQ9OlQa2GiDuyIw0tU/58+7YgPmQ/8=; b=FXg3zLPLtmlCFWXuG5zfJMrhSUWI9jeyVk/sdb3zps/Cn99mH4A+boLaBjbnNLQAggpllSRpY+PxIBXOjjGpq+Pv62Pm7kpdZWJYxbGe8RgzCr/+9yMSleWCCKUewnXe; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=localhost) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SStw7-0006C2-Eq for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 11:47:27 -0600 Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 11:47:26 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120511174726.GA21845@hemlock.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201205010558.q415wAFu091478@mail.r-bonomi.com> <4FAC6B61.5060604@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FAC6B61.5060604@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.com} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with perrin@apotheon.com} Subject: Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 17:47:29 -0000 On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 06:29:05PM -0700, Edward M wrote: > On 05/10/2012 03:45 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > >Regarding Nemeth's I am undecided between the 4th (Unix& Linux) or > >the 3rd. Please advise. > > i purchased the third edition because I took a look in the 4th > the table of contents > and it appears anything FreeBSD related was remove and it > only focuses on: Solaris > Linux( red hat ubuntu) and AIX. However third edition mentions BSDs >From the index of my copy of the third edition, I see these entries: 4.4BSD 2 . . . BSD (Berkeley UNIX) 2 . . . FreeBSD 4 >From the index of my copy of the fourth edition, I see these entries: BSD Printing 1054-1065 see also printing architecture 1054-1055 configuration 1059-1065 lpc command 1057-1059 lpd daemon 1056 lpq command 1056-1057 lpr command 1056 lprm command 1057 printcap file 1059-1065 PRINTER environment variable 1054 BSD UNIX 8, 12, 1268-1273 . . . FreeBSD 8 . . . NetBSD 8 . . . OpenBSD 8 Page 8 of the fourth edition mentions various BSD Unix systems in the section "Friction Between UNIX and Linux". Page 12's mention of BSD Unix in the fourth edition appears to correspond to page 3's un-indexed mention of FreeBSD in the third edition (specifically FreeBSD 3.4), in reference to the example Unix OSes they chose to use when discussing various OSes, though FreeBSD is not mentioned specifically in the fourth edition on that page and BSD Unix is largely referred to in a historical context. This appears to be a legitimate case of BSD Unix being phased out of part of the text as a relevant OS, but it is not a section that actually says anything of specific technical value. Pages 1268-1273 in the fourth edition correspond to the bulk of the section "A Brief History of System Administration" in the back of the book. The third edition's equivalent is the end of page 2 and a little over half of page 3, "The Sordid History of UNIX". The fourth edition's index mentions "jail, chroot" which, when investigated in the text, has nothing at all to do with FreeBSD jails; it's just about chroot. The third edition also contains information about chroot, but does not mention it under the J section of the index. It looks to me like the fourth edition probably presents quite a bit more historical information particular to BSD Unix systems than the third edition, judging by the index. In the table of contents, I see that the third edition has a section set aside for BSD printing, despite lack of mention in the index. It looks like the table of contents section for "BSD and AIX printing" in the fourth edition (the first edition to include coverage of AIX, apparently) goes into a fair bit more detail about what's in the equivalent section. It looks to me, at a glance, like the fourth edition probably kept all of the BSD Unix related stuff from the third, probably updated slightly but not expanded outside of historical information. While a failure to expand technical information on BSD Unix systems would result in a reduction of the percentage of the book that covers BSD Unix technical matters, given the growth in size between third and fourth editions, the quantity of technical information about BSD Unix systems does not appear to have shrunk at all, from what I've seen. Of course, I might easily have overlooked something. Is there something else I should try to find in the index or table of contents that would be in the third edition but not the fourth? Can you give me some examples of the sorts of things you'd expect to find in the table of contents that is lacking in the fourth edition but present in the third? -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 11 19:06:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72FC106566B for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 19:06:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eam1edward@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C95C8FC12 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 19:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl8 with SMTP id l8so3857612yen.13 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 12:06:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7RXS6ORQ9k8E++fcXzTIxF3EG9hzr2eYW7C0k1V/tEk=; b=KYioITUufPkNYNG9G7k5ByeMRi90lFddbmJNMHkr770RXHwKXS+ol1L8cNj+3FHLpa HJaGPo7P3SZDN73aAW0LZqEdvajSC9u0B30MGh52L2eT1CM4wWnQoP118XwzBJ7YWRcz G2HFge8KWXZ2CXUPpt8og099P6yhUput6ekScNQEkE2PtgBjpsai9QxYqXypLEcspkFK qfYqmbHYogcCmdlSkbWWnN4ZXcNMgquL4bIuS+P1jKnGZb2RjmtEiKAN0vAivKzmzKYQ a39HwcsAOXgb5DjvWE6h02qGLCAUaKGSmYszeJ+4P5+oqhzmE74GBFjd6LhE6s44EvO9 JN5Q== Received: by 10.60.169.146 with SMTP id ae18mr4219428oec.36.1336763173778; Fri, 11 May 2012 12:06:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([174.134.109.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m2sm10309193obk.9.2012.05.11.12.06.12 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 11 May 2012 12:06:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FAD6474.1070803@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 12:11:48 -0700 From: Edward M User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201205010558.q415wAFu091478@mail.r-bonomi.com> <4FAC6B61.5060604@gmail.com> <20120511174726.GA21845@hemlock.hydra> In-Reply-To: <20120511174726.GA21845@hemlock.hydra> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 19:06:14 -0000 On 05/11/2012 10:47 AM, Chad Perrin wrote: > Is there something else I should try to find in the index or table of > contents that would be in the third edition but not the fourth? Can you > give me some examples of the sorts of things you'd expect to find in the > table of contents that is lacking in the fourth edition but present in > the third? Hi,:-) So far I think I found a few that may make a difference. According to the "table of contents" in the 4th edition in the chapter called "Booting and shuting down it only shows entries for: red hat, HP-UX, AIX, SUSE,Ubuntu. However in the third edition, show entries for FreeBSD's Booting and shuting down process. And another example is in the 4th edition the chapter called "Adding new users", only mentions how to add users for: SUSE, Redhat Solaris HP-UX and AIX. However in the 3rd edition, explains how to add users on FreeBSD and how FreeBSD's master.passwd file, login.conf. work,etc The third edition's chapter called "Drivers and the kernel" shows how to build a freebsd kernel, create a BSD config file, tuning the freebsd kernel, add freebsd device drivers,etc. I was not able to find those entries in the the 4th editions "Drivers and the kernel. chapter. the 3rd editions TCP/IP chapter shows network config for freebsd. However in the table of contents of the 4th edition does not. I'm searching for a website that contains the 3rd edition table of contents so one can compare between the two editions for better judgement. unfortunate, those were a few examples i have time to point out. I think may make a great difference. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 11 19:12:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9EB7106566B for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 19:12:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eam1edward@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799418FC14 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 19:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so4803756obc.13 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 12:12:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PuW1zH0Y83LvZ4xs4eAPxRdR1Yz7TfvrAxvOe/qqfhU=; b=C2kbZNmbrLcjMCcOs7BPyKKSXKY7CBkKEHGzXJK4zSftjaYLexxSUVOjrLKCKY8mSF LmSDY92LfwVVeUoyMzqG4NtcoZMPSbYzkWKJkjgkQIvLMrUXILtUpjyNdRf8AsgSBR7U nm9q6lJyxpGnajFMl+pib3IQPHnJd/NAZYOWiD4nmGLF46awbVrYq6Ba+z/gK+oHPMb2 RFfQgF/OQgVhWSra+2KdEqTBjWRvNI7gZP2ahhrUaW+RBVOtCBP+NrEsiVPi6qushTec RkLdeleBndsUlfjqcybzji9WWU5KzUwQvzMXQr/0AQTACxueEq5OjSW3zeWvOt7jvbTk EyEg== Received: by 10.182.169.68 with SMTP id ac4mr13375022obc.19.1336763566843; Fri, 11 May 2012 12:12:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([174.134.109.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t5sm8339185oef.10.2012.05.11.12.12.45 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 11 May 2012 12:12:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FAD65FE.60904@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 12:18:22 -0700 From: Edward M User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201205010558.q415wAFu091478@mail.r-bonomi.com> <4FAC6B61.5060604@gmail.com> <20120511174726.GA21845@hemlock.hydra> <4FAD6474.1070803@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4FAD6474.1070803@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 19:12:47 -0000 On 05/11/2012 12:11 PM, Edward M wrote: > So far I think I found a few that may make a difference. According > to the "table of contents" in the 4th edition in the chapter called > "Booting and shuting down it > only shows entries for: red hat, HP-UX, AIX, SUSE,Ubuntu. However > in the third edition, show entries for FreeBSD's Booting and shuting > down process. > And another example is in the 4th edition the chapter called > "Adding new users", only mentions how to add users for: > SUSE, Redhat Solaris HP-UX and AIX. However in the 3rd edition, > explains how to add users on FreeBSD and > how FreeBSD's master.passwd file, login.conf. work,etc The third > edition's chapter called > "Drivers and the kernel" shows how to build a freebsd kernel, > create a BSD config file, tuning the freebsd kernel, add freebsd > device drivers,etc. > I was not able to find those entries in the the 4th editions > "Drivers and the kernel. chapter. the 3rd editions TCP/IP chapter > shows network config for freebsd. > However in the table of contents of the 4th edition does not. I'm > searching for a website that contains the 3rd edition table of > contents so one can compare between > the two editions for better judgement. > unfortunate, those were a few examples i have time to point out. > I think may make a great difference. I apologized, if my email came out looking strange with chopped up/ uneven sentences,etc. I have to check into that:-( From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 11 21:15:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C55106566B for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 21:15:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AABEF8FC0A for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 21:15:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SSxBe-0001n7-6n; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:15:42 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SSxBc-0005dF-Mo; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:15:40 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4BLFeds027643; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:15:40 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q4BLFdUD027642; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:15:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bris.ac.uk using -f Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 22:15:39 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Ian Smith Message-ID: <20120511211539.GA27629@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Ian Smith , Anton Shterenlikht , Chris Whitehouse , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120509115639.BED74106577B@hub.freebsd.org> <20120509231835.W94518@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120509231835.W94518@sola.nimnet.asn.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Chris Whitehouse Subject: Re: ACPI temprature settings [WAS: Re: laptop very hot and noisy] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 21:15:51 -0000 On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:29:15AM +1000, Ian Smith wrote: > In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 414, Issue 3, Message: 2 > On Tue, 8 May 2012 15:06:04 +0100 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 07:59:58PM +0100, Chris Whitehouse wrote: > > > On 01/05/2012 13:41, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > >So I might need to pull the laptop apart.. > > > >I'm just not sure I could put it back > > > >together... > > > > > > > >Thanks anyway > > > > > > service manual (c02834030.pdf): > > > http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/CoreRedirect.jsp?redirectReason=DocIndexPDF&prodSeriesId=3368539&targetPage=http%3A%2F%2Fbizsupport1.austin.hp.com%2Fbc%2Fdocs%2Fsupport%2FSupportManual%2Fc02834030%2Fc02834030.pdf > > > > > > short url: > > > http://bit.ly/Ivgs5C > > > > > > HP are pretty good about service manuals. > > > > yes, this is partly why I bought an HP laptop. > > I had previous experience with other HP/Compaq/Digital > > hardware and manuals - they are generally very good. > > > > Anyway, this was easier than I expected. > > I removed a lot of dust from the fan > > and the heat sink gills. I also replaced > > the "thermal material". > > > > I rebuilt gcc47 and saw the highest temperature of 75. > > This is on the southern side, so not too bad. The > > noise reduced too. > > Happiness is a warm CPU .. so much easier the next time it needs doing. > > > Now, I'd just like to understand better the > > meaning of these console messages: > > > > May 8 15:00:08 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC3: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 40.0 > > May 8 15:00:08 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC2: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 50.0 > > May 8 15:00:18 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC3: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 40.0 > > May 8 15:00:18 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC2: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 50.0 > > May 8 15:00:28 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC3: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 40.0 > > May 8 15:00:28 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC2: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 50.0 > > May 8 15:00:38 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC3: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 40.0 > > May 8 15:00:38 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC2: temperature 64.0 >= setpoint 50.0 > > May 8 15:00:48 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC3: temperature 65.0 >= setpoint 40.0 > > May 8 15:00:48 mech-aslap239 kernel: acpi_tz0: _AC2: temperature 65.0 >= setpoint 50.0 > > > > Where are setpoints defined? > > What's acpi_tz? > > What are AC1, AC2, AC3? > > Which kernel tunables are involved in the > > switching from one fan speed to another > > (assuming AC1, AC2, AC3 are related to fan > > speed in some way)? > > To add to What Chris said, perhaps more directly see acpi_thermal(4) > > Please show us `sysctl hw.acpi`? Particularly `sysctl hw.acpi.thermal` > shows your machine's thermal zone(s) settings. These messages are re > your zone tz1, which sure looks like an active mode multi-setpoint fan. > > This logging does appear strange; it suggests that the temperature is > always reading as 64 or 65C - which sounds reasonable given it peaks at > 75C - but since that's greater than either of the 40C and 50C setpoints, > I don't see why it should (appear to) change between _AC2 and _AC3 every > 10 seconds, most likely the value of hw.acpi.thermal.polling_rate > > Do you hear a fan changing speed at that frequency? Does that echo what > hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature reports from time to time? > > Do you have any extra ACPI debugging enabled? Or did you last boot with > verbose messages? If so, maybe it's just reporting fan change activity? > > Unless someone here has an explanation, I suspect this would be of > interest on the freebsd-acpi@ list, where core acpi folks hang out. > > > I had a quick look at ???aacpi(4), > > but none of the above are mentioned. > > Searching acpi(4) for thermal|THERMAL gets you there, but yes, you first > needed to know that 'tz' means 'thermal zone'. ACPI be deep and wide .. yes, I got it now. It's quite easy really. acpi_thermal(4) explains nearly all I need to know. I have GEN8> sysctl hw.acpi.thermal hw.acpi.thermal.min_runtime: 0 hw.acpi.thermal.polling_rate: 10 hw.acpi.thermal.user_override: 0 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature: 64.0C hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.active: 1 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.passive_cooling: 1 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.thermal_flags: 0 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._PSV: 95.0C hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._HOT: -1 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._CRT: 105.0C hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._ACx: 75.0C 60.0C 50.0C 40.0C -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._TC1: 1 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._TC2: 2 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._TSP: 100 GEN8> Which seems reasonable. And yes, my previous post was from a vebose boot. So all seems fine now. Many thanks for your help. -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 11 21:49:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8E7106564A for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 21:49:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from mail.shire.net (mail.shire.net [199.102.78.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7812A8FC08 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 21:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-76-27-96-201.hsd1.ut.comcast.net ([76.27.96.201] helo=[192.168.99.216]) by mail.shire.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SSx5X-000C3F-HB for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 15:09:23 -0600 From: "Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 15:09:22 -0600 Message-Id: To: FreeBSD Mailing List Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 76.27.96.201 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: question on SYN_SENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 21:49:14 -0000 it is my understanding that SYN_SENT is when MY SIDE sends out a request = and is awaiting a reply? One of the jails we run for a customer had hundreds (if not thousands) = of attempts to connect from the 147. address you see below. It was = exhausting resources so that new tcp connections could not be made until = some closed. I added that address to a "pf" block statement to stop it but now we get = a rolling connections in a "netstat -a" as show below (host. being a = generic name used in place of actual host on our side). I am wondering = if this shows something on our side trying to connect out? That is what = it appears to me to be, which does not make sense. tcp4 0 0 host.52562 147.237.76.155.http SYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52561 147.237.76.155.http SYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52560 147.237.76.155.http SYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52559 147.237.76.155.http SYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52558 147.237.76.155.http SYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52557 147.237.76.155.http SYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52556 147.237.76.155.http SYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52555 147.237.76.155.http SYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52554 147.237.76.155.http SYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52553 147.237.76.155.http SYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52552 147.237.76.155.http SYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52551 147.237.76.155.http SYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52550 147.237.76.155.http SYN_SENT thanks Chad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 11 22:15:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37CDD106566C for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:15:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from mail.shire.net (mail.shire.net [199.102.78.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121898FC12 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-76-27-96-201.hsd1.ut.comcast.net ([76.27.96.201] helo=[192.168.99.216]) by mail.shire.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SSy7r-000E32-FH; Fri, 11 May 2012 16:15:51 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC" In-Reply-To: <4782C161-4B28-4276-9559-A54B711368F1@mac.com> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 16:15:48 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0A88B145-82C4-4167-AD13-829CCAC6298F@shire.net> References: <4782C161-4B28-4276-9559-A54B711368F1@mac.com> To: Chuck Swiger X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 76.27.96.201 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: question on SYN_SENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 22:15:52 -0000 On May 11, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On May 11, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC wrote: >> it is my understanding that SYN_SENT is when MY SIDE sends out a = request and is awaiting a reply? >=20 > That's right. >=20 >> One of the jails we run for a customer had hundreds (if not = thousands) of attempts to connect from the 147. address you see below. = It was exhausting resources so that new tcp connections could not be = made until some closed. >=20 > You have/had your jail opening connections to the webserver at IP = 147.237.76.155, not that IP trying to connect to you. >=20 >> I added that address to a "pf" block statement to stop it but now we = get a rolling connections in a "netstat -a" as show below (host. being a = generic name used in place of actual host on our side). I am wondering = if this shows something on our side trying to connect out? That is what = it appears to me to be, which does not make sense. >>=20 >>=20 >> tcp4 0 0 host.52562 147.237.76.155.http = SYN_SENT >> tcp4 0 0 host.52561 147.237.76.155.http = SYN_SENT >=20 > Yes, your side is trying to connect out. > Unless you know better, it seems reasonable to gather that it's doing = a DoS attack against: Hi Chuck! Thanks. I am investigating as this side should not be going out at all, = but the SYN_SENT made me think it was. Thanks Chad >=20 > % whois 147.237.76.155 > [ ... ] > inetnum: 147.237.0.0 - 147.237.255.255 > netname: IL-GOVT-NET > descr: Israeli Government Network > country: IL > admin-c: AT979-RIPE > tech-c: TT441-RIPE > status: ASSIGNED PI > mnt-by: GOV-IL-DNS > mnt-lower: GOV-IL-DNS > mnt-routes: AS8867-MNT { ANY } > mnt-routes: AS9116-MNT { 147.237.232.0/24^24-24 } > source: RIPE # Filtered >=20 > person: Admin Tehila > address: Israel Ministry Of Finance > address: 1 Netanel Lorech st > address: Jerusalem Israel > phone: +972 2 6664666 > fax-no: +972 2 6664650 > remarks: For ABUSE and security issues please contact > remarks: email: abuse@tehila.gov.il > remarks: or contact CERT.gov.il at report@CERT.gov.il > nic-hdl: AT979-RIPE > source: RIPE # Filtered >=20 > Regards, > --=20 > -Chuck >=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 11 23:08:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7AD1065673 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 23:08:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from nk11p00mm-asmtp007.mac.com (nk11p00mm-asmtp007.mac.com [17.158.161.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05208FC08 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 23:08:58 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (unknown [17.209.4.71]) by nk11p00mm-asmtp007.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01(7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0M3V00APNPHYVA40@nk11p00mm-asmtp007.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:08:23 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.6.7580,1.0.260,0.0.0000 definitions=2012-05-11_06:2012-05-11, 2012-05-11, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1205110234 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 15:08:22 -0700 Message-id: <4782C161-4B28-4276-9559-A54B711368F1@mac.com> References: To: "Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: question on SYN_SENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 23:08:59 -0000 On May 11, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC wrote: > it is my understanding that SYN_SENT is when MY SIDE sends out a request and is awaiting a reply? That's right. > One of the jails we run for a customer had hundreds (if not thousands) of attempts to connect from the 147. address you see below. It was exhausting resources so that new tcp connections could not be made until some closed. You have/had your jail opening connections to the webserver at IP 147.237.76.155, not that IP trying to connect to you. > I added that address to a "pf" block statement to stop it but now we get a rolling connections in a "netstat -a" as show below (host. being a generic name used in place of actual host on our side). I am wondering if this shows something on our side trying to connect out? That is what it appears to me to be, which does not make sense. > > > tcp4 0 0 host.52562 147.237.76.155.http SYN_SENT > tcp4 0 0 host.52561 147.237.76.155.http SYN_SENT Yes, your side is trying to connect out. Unless you know better, it seems reasonable to gather that it's doing a DoS attack against: % whois 147.237.76.155 [ ... ] inetnum: 147.237.0.0 - 147.237.255.255 netname: IL-GOVT-NET descr: Israeli Government Network country: IL admin-c: AT979-RIPE tech-c: TT441-RIPE status: ASSIGNED PI mnt-by: GOV-IL-DNS mnt-lower: GOV-IL-DNS mnt-routes: AS8867-MNT { ANY } mnt-routes: AS9116-MNT { 147.237.232.0/24^24-24 } source: RIPE # Filtered person: Admin Tehila address: Israel Ministry Of Finance address: 1 Netanel Lorech st address: Jerusalem Israel phone: +972 2 6664666 fax-no: +972 2 6664650 remarks: For ABUSE and security issues please contact remarks: email: abuse@tehila.gov.il remarks: or contact CERT.gov.il at report@CERT.gov.il nic-hdl: AT979-RIPE source: RIPE # Filtered Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 12 00:05:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 638D11065675 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 00:05:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F318FC1C for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 00:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q4C06Itk036463; Fri, 11 May 2012 19:06:18 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 19:06:18 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201205120006.q4C06Itk036463@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: chad@shire.net, cswiger@mac.com In-Reply-To: <0A88B145-82C4-4167-AD13-829CCAC6298F@shire.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question on SYN_SENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 00:05:08 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri May 11 17:19:29 2012 > From: "Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC" > Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 16:15:48 -0600 > To: Chuck Swiger > Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List > Subject: Re: question on SYN_SENT > > > On May 11, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: > > > On May 11, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC wrote: > >> it is my understanding that SYN_SENT is when MY SIDE sends out a reques > >> t and is awaiting a reply? > > > > That's right. > > > >> One of the jails we run for a customer had hundreds (if not thousands) o > >> f attempts to connect from the 147. address you see below. Correction. As Chuck pointed out it is your box attempting to connect *TO* that address. > >> It was exha > >> usting resources so that new tcp connections could not be made until som > >> e closed. > > > > You have/had your jail opening connections to the webserver at IP 147.237 > > .76.155, not that IP trying to connect to you. > > > >> I added that address to a "pf" block statement to stop it but now we get > >> a rolling connections in a "netstat -a" as show below (host. being a ge > >> neric name used in place of actual host on our side). I am wondering i > >> f this shows something on our side trying to connect out? That is what > >> it appears to me to be, which does not make sense. > >> > >> > >> tcp4 0 0 host.52562 147.237.76.155.http SYN_SENT > >> tcp4 0 0 host.52561 147.237.76.155.http SYN_SENT > > > > Yes, your side is trying to connect out. > > Unless you know better, it seems reasonable to gather that it's doing a D > > oS attack against: > > Hi Chuck! > > Thanks. I am investigating as this side should not be going out at all, bu > t the SYN_SENT made me think it was. > 'Should not' does not mean 'is not'. and unfortunately, it -is- attempting to "go out". There are at least a couple of possible explanations, none of them "good". 1) the jail is attempting a DoS (or participating in DDoS) against an Israeli _government_ network/machine. 2) the jail is 'owned' by a botnet, and is trying to 'phone home' for instructions. The webserver on the IP address listed has -extremely- 'suspicious' content, to wit; html> body> script> document.cookie='fffffff=ee0333b9fffffff_ee0333b9; path=/'; window.location.href=window.location.href; /script> /body> /html> From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 12 00:18:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C674B106564A for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 00:18:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from oproxy9.bluehost.com (oproxy9.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89C818FC0A for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 00:18:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24274 invoked by uid 0); 12 May 2012 00:18:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by oproxy9.bluehost.com with SMTP; 12 May 2012 00:18:34 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apotheon.com; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=aFCuRfVNhigOnLjVEjT5WSzHHQre6MnXz/lDASJRWV8=; b=ASvTc97R3u/p5HWvf6BigfiA/TnHlu0W7UmgzZeR77K69E4jk6liqr95eYjIntt4Ohu5LckWR36Fz7j8F3RJFXhdp3PzlhHBYpakOfu26NtPWPwlbeJLpNOhK25/FeZr; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=localhost) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ST02b-00077l-Mg for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:18:33 -0600 Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 18:18:32 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120512001832.GA4644@hemlock.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201205010558.q415wAFu091478@mail.r-bonomi.com> <4FAC6B61.5060604@gmail.com> <20120511174726.GA21845@hemlock.hydra> <4FAD6474.1070803@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FAD6474.1070803@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.com} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with perrin@apotheon.com} Subject: Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 00:18:34 -0000 On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:11:48PM -0700, Edward M wrote: > > So far I think I found a few that may make a difference. > According to the "table of contents" in the 4th edition in the > chapter called "Booting and shuting down it > only shows entries for: red hat, HP-UX, AIX, SUSE,Ubuntu. However > in the third edition, show entries for FreeBSD's Booting and shuting > down process. > And another example is in the 4th edition the chapter called > "Adding new users", only mentions how to add users for: > SUSE, Redhat Solaris HP-UX and AIX. However in the 3rd edition, > explains how to add users on FreeBSD and > how FreeBSD's master.passwd file, login.conf. work,etc The > third edition's chapter called > "Drivers and the kernel" shows how to build a freebsd kernel, > create a BSD config file, tuning the freebsd kernel, add freebsd > device drivers,etc. > I was not able to find those entries in the the 4th editions > "Drivers and the kernel. chapter. the 3rd editions TCP/IP > chapter shows network config for freebsd. > However in the table of contents of the 4th edition does not. > I'm searching for a website that contains the 3rd edition table of > contents so one can compare between > the two editions for better judgement. > unfortunate, those were a few examples i have time to point > out. I think may make a great difference. Okay, thanks. You've provided a pretty good representative selection, I think. I guess there are two problems: the third edition index is woefully incomplete, and the fourth edition text has for some reason basically traded FreeBSD for AIX -- which makes little sense to me. I appreciate the time you put into this. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 11 23:13:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC1F106564A for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 23:13:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail.vnc@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15058FC14 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 23:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so4436969pbb.13 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 16:13:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=S+3S+XAFVN1oat84MVj4VRbqvt9QmEE5amFsnytRdBc=; b=mpFhfzQqY8JW1Y/vv0q+K1QOHUE7zAyKvzlUsq1Cfht4VN+DDBYrAsmrA/5mer8TaJ m7D/uFz4UVd1zxdLgp1h9egfJbBN61sL5DZgiNGRVGBSsJkw4K3YWybOK4zEYV/r+8Hk Uvrz8Tz09z7I8DFvqC2cKzxDzyMYpE5U+9OZ5WkoX3Q6HeUs7jUpN+mWFKPdsyQ3t+xW 7AV/7oJk05OA3EA7+el2uRXj3L6fyyAOKKBju7u2hBQSoK3sMNibVDhDJpEJ4MEA1pMn Fs/GLeD9MzBw+T4rOQs91YrJozPa+OI1KSGY35QqzZj6mF8YZ3dq0tT3VoWETY4JKI41 4Bnw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.203.66 with SMTP id ko2mr11097514pbc.84.1336777992506; Fri, 11 May 2012 16:13:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.165.2 with HTTP; Fri, 11 May 2012 16:13:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 18:13:12 -0500 Message-ID: From: Vinicio Santiago Altamirano Mendez To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 12 May 2012 01:28:28 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: help me please X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 23:13:12 -0000 please can u tell me how to remapping tftp with a remapping file or exist another form?. i see that in tftp manual no exist the -m option how to do remapping on tftp on mac os x 10.6 pleaseeee thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 12 02:02:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7737B106566B for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 02:02:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rg.lists@rzweb.com) Received: from flabnapple.net (flabnapple.net [216.129.104.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CC48FC0A for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 02:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.flabnapple.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by flabnapple.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0961CC0FB for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:55:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 18:55:54 -0700 From: Ron To: Message-ID: <2e9591c0bcf420555bd3d8c89780a9e1@flabnapple2.net> X-Sender: rg.lists@rzweb.com User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.7.2 Subject: lots httpd processes with lockf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 02:02:32 -0000 I recently updated from FreeBSD7 to FreeBSD9. The server runs (and has always run) apache-2.2. When I do a 'top' I see around 30 entries that all look like this: 32016 www 1 20 0 321M 40744K lockf 1 0:13 0.00% httpd When I do a ps and grep for www, I get back ~62 entries that look like this: www 81139 0.0 0.9 324456 36784 ?? I 7:50AM 0:03.49 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DNOHTTPACCEPT My hardware is; hw.machine: amd64 hw.model: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9550 @ 2.83GHz hw.ncpu: 4 hw.machine_arch: amd64 Is it normal to see that many httpd process and lockf entries? Or do I have something incorrectly configured. I don't know if this started happening after 9.X, it might have been doing this before. Ron From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 12 02:14:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9753C1065670 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 02:14:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eam1edward@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D948FC0A for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 02:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so5319750obc.13 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 19:14:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=X5dGgr6U1mjDz1R11tTHntKEliGj9fgOF7K4kaCkBRs=; b=y1Si35HeXoH4e8M+Mcthb8rWmuolO7MAg/uBxUKbsS8RhJzS9sDhfmIVr9crnWlsFO qmDlzWSDirX3c3i2pDXSs5jn6VUbCJ/D6/4ycGgt7C5Sz+6VkuzCFlidGAVO+7f9V6BS bxhc7OoVK6MMnumcmp4OSsM+VTUHsFnRCkscja1/Rgwk43mAyXvTq0bDJLK/CEgOMRwW 456eGW5O07vHvVdLrUG+kVRjhSd97HRSI9uuPcsHckf4oev9AdQck8jgddFfmjStMLnC nm8QEt30rmm1j6pYIX+GiZ3GSD3bw4Ku/BAlysLLGvmzdaVP+MjavLDXa9WJQcrvijcT 3GiA== Received: by 10.60.172.195 with SMTP id be3mr442273oec.48.1336788866699; Fri, 11 May 2012 19:14:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([174.134.109.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t5sm9187414oef.10.2012.05.11.19.14.25 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 11 May 2012 19:14:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FADC8D1.2000703@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 19:20:01 -0700 From: Edward M User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201205010558.q415wAFu091478@mail.r-bonomi.com> <4FAC6B61.5060604@gmail.com> <20120511174726.GA21845@hemlock.hydra> <4FAD6474.1070803@gmail.com> <20120512001832.GA4644@hemlock.hydra> In-Reply-To: <20120512001832.GA4644@hemlock.hydra> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 02:14:27 -0000 On 05/11/2012 05:18 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > I appreciate the time you put into this. It was no problem at all:-) had fun comparing. Now that I'm free and have more time I went over the 3rd edition table of contents and found a few instances that mentions FreeBSD. In chapter "Adding a Disk" describes the FFS, shows a freebsd fstab example file and teaches how to add a disk in FreeBSD,etc. I Continued glancing at the contents and it appears the rest of the book is pretty much on subjects that apply to all UNIX OS. > the fourth edition text has for some reason > basically traded FreeBSD for AIX -- which makes little sense to me. I found a site that it kinda shows that this is was happened, AIX replaced FreeBSD:-( mid way through the site shows the 4th edition only focuses on redhat, opensuse, rhel, solaris, HPUX and IBM AIX. http://www.admin.com/ I From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 12 06:58:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EBE106564A for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 06:58:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller23@insightbb.com) Received: from mail.insightbb.com (smtp1.insight.synacor.com [208.47.185.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401738FC08 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 06:58:17 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=hs79RfqGu96KpPcBAZlACpM79L42wc4ZA0TUlQl3rS0= c=1 sm=0 a=jLN7EqiLvroA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=zxiErcchp3y13lTo3iMA:9 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=Q/oqmR4JO1zR3vNQamCQeQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.insight.synacor.com header.from=mueller23@insightbb.com; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: smtp01.insight.synacor.com smtp.mail=mueller23@insightbb.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (smtp01.insight.synacor.com: transitional domain insightbb.com does not designate 74.134.26.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.134.26.53] ([74.134.26.53:50863] helo=localhost) by mail.insightbb.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.40 r(29895/29896)) with ESMTP id BB/CC-17750-D690EAF4; Sat, 12 May 2012 02:55:41 -0400 Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 02:55:41 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Vinicio Santiago Altamirano Mendez Subject: Re: help me please X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 06:58:18 -0000 from Vinicio Santiago Altamirano Mendez : > please can u tell me how to remapping tftp with a remapping file or exist > another form?. > i see that in tftp manual no exist the -m option > how to do remapping on tftp on mac os x 10.6 pleaseeee > thanks. Is this question for FreeBSD or Mac OS X? This emailing list is for FreeBSD, as the email address suggests. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 12 08:18:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7D0106566B for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 08:18:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gobble.wa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A067B8FC12 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 08:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so3251507wgb.31 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 01:18:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=JHG14GkmIXhwnMFKHc9YIpWd1iuhsbOOT8TzM9TOc7U=; b=YlyXpQ4l7RQErtYacJs8UFGCsP6b4hIv2ShKvRcoia+qPq/yFHPfP2kU5Z0BulLY0G w7tqw5q7X14CRDy0mqStfeAFgOaohkWya4Xr8nCgyLFWAs13XavtBW+G6u+2qsVZwelC aZN2Jn3NESjfYRRJNYGSF35ESvXJtnvezSyYElJVEe2CVWP9Sq8HDuYkUJBf3kY+nwvH J/U6u61G73jmQRiMOmxitB+R8/wy+SoF4ExjGOAIWJmafDrKGd2NG32JKtaRyIrQ/aYd 4BAfYTimTNiwvmEkFStDxB+WdtEGWUjxDaFG6+PyFSvVl2BcOWfktJTQYmPuoal576Yy izCg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.105.69 with SMTP id gk5mr2795878wib.3.1336810685475; Sat, 12 May 2012 01:18:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.85.130 with HTTP; Sat, 12 May 2012 01:18:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 01:18:05 -0700 Message-ID: From: Waitman Gobble To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: help me please X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 08:18:07 -0000 On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote: > from Vinicio Santiago Altamirano Mendez : > > > please can u tell me how to remapping tftp with a remapping file or exist > > another form?. > > i see that in tftp manual no exist the -m option > > how to do remapping on tftp on mac os x 10.6 pleaseeee > > thanks. > > Is this question for FreeBSD or Mac OS X? > > This emailing list is for FreeBSD, as the email address suggests. > > Tom > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Gosh, it sounds kind of drastic. Have you tried fuse? http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse/browse_thread/thread/97951b355e57db56 Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 12 12:55:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55200106566C for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cjr@cruwe.de) Received: from cruwe.de (cruwe.de [188.40.164.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E944F8FC12 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 12:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cruwe.de (unknown [127.0.0.4]) by cruwe.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2C514774 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 12:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by cruwe.de (Postfix, from userid 65534) id D6D4D14773; Sat, 12 May 2012 12:49:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.cruwe.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from dijkstra.cruwe.de (p5B3798C1.dip.t-dialin.net [91.55.152.193]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cruwe.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7BCDD14771 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 12:49:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 14:49:18 +0200 From: "Christopher J. Ruwe" To: Message-ID: <20120512144918.715616f0@dijkstra.cruwe.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV on mail.cruwe.de using ClamSMTP Subject: dlink dwl-122g e1 on 9-stable, working only partially? (or not at all?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 12:55:15 -0000 Currently I am fighting with (against?) a dlink dwl-g122 usb wlan dongle. The casing is claiming the thing to be of H/W-version E1, F/W-version 5.00, which I interpret as hardware and firmware. I am running 9-stable (FreeBSD ritchie.cruwe.de 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #8 r235064: Fri May 11 21:32:52 CEST 2012 cjr@ritchie.cruwe.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RITCHIE amd64) and admittedly, dwl-g122 is not included in the hw-compatibility list for 9.0. I am also aware that others have been unsuccessful, though some time back, to get dlw-g122 e running (http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=27123). However, I am somewhat successful in getting the dongle recognized by if_run.ko, though not to work as I would like to: dmesg gives then [...] ugen0.3: at usbus0 run0: on usbus0 run0: MAC/BBP RT3070 (rev 0x0201), RF RT2020 (MIMO 1T1R), address b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by hand for now. wlan0: Ethernet address: b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec run0: firmware RT2870 ver. 0.236 loaded ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by hand for now. wlan0: Ethernet address: b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec run0: firmware RT2870 ver. 0.236 loaded run0: firmware RT2870 ver. 0.236 loaded ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by hand for now. wlan0: Ethernet address: b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec run0: firmware RT2870 ver. 0.236 loaded ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by hand for now. wlan0: Ethernet address: b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec run0: firmware RT2870 ver. 0.236 loaded run0: firmware RT2870 ver. 0.236 loaded ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by hand for now. wlan0: Ethernet address: b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by hand for now. wlan0: Ethernet address: b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec run0: firmware RT2870 ver. 0.236 loaded ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by hand for now. wlan0: Ethernet address: b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec run0: firmware RT2870 ver. 0.236 loaded wlan0: ieee80211_new_state_locked: pending RUN -> SCAN transition lost wlan: mac acl policy registered I have no explanation for the multiple occurrences, I have been trying for some time now, though. After sudo ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev run0 wlanmode hostap sudo ifconfig wlan0 inet 192.168.3.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ssid bsdap channel - I get run0: flags=8a43 metric 0 mtu 2290 ether b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec nd6 options=29 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g status: running wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec inet6 fe80::baa3:86ff:fe97:c1ec%wlan0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xb inet 192.168.3.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.3.255 nd6 options=29 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g status: running ssid bsdap channel 1 (2412 MHz 11g) bssid b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec regdomain ETSI country DE authmode OPEN privacy OFF deftxkey 2 TKIP 2:128-bit TKIP 3:128-bit txpower 30 scanvalid 60 protmode CTS wme dtimperiod 1 -dfs This looks quite reasonable to me, however, I have been unsuccessful so far to get the ssid bsdap to appear on any scan done from the prospective clients (one 9-stable notebook, two Linux notebooks and one Nexus S android). Does anyone have an idea what is left to try or should I give up and look for another solution to build a wireless-capable router? Thanks in advance, cheers and have a nice weekend, -- Christopher TZ GMT + 2h From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 12 13:13:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37020106566B for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 13:13:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (worf.ds9.tecnik93.com [81.196.207.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BAC8FC0C for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 13:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.170] (unknown [201.53.184.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFFB822C5198; Sat, 12 May 2012 16:05:43 +0300 (EEST) References: User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 10:05:34 -0300 To: FreeBSD , FreeBSD Message-ID: <999c5ac7-c287-4829-b80c-6c0f1d79f925@email.android.com> Subject: Re: Problem with SSL ans "net/sendemail" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 13:13:33 -0000 Carmel wrote: >Error message: > >invalid SSL_version specified at >/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.2/IO/Socket/SSL.pm line 308 > >This is generated by the "sendEmail" program. The "net/sendemail" port >compiled with SSL support. > >make showconfig >===> The following configuration options are available for >sendEmail-1.56: > SSL=on "Enable SSL support" > > >This was working fine until today. This all started after a reboot of >the system. > >ssh -V >OpenSSH_5.4p1_hpn13v11 FreeBSD-20100308, OpenSSL 0.9.8q 2 Dec 2010 > >openssl version >OpenSSL 1.0.1a 19 Apr 2012 > >It appears I have two different versions of OpenSSL installed. I >deliberately installed the newer version and placed this in the >"/etc/make.conf" file: > >WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes > >I have no idea what happened or how to correct this problem. I tried >rebuilding Perl and the two ports listed in the "sendemail" port and >the "sendemail" port itself without a satisfactory result. > >By the way, I noticed that "OpenSSH 6.0" was released April 22, 2012. >Are there any plans to get that into the ports system, or better yet, >replace the aging base system? > >-- >Carmel ✌ >carmel_ny@hotmail.com I'm currently traveling, with no computer nearby. Please ping me in 3 days. -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 12 14:28:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB89106564A for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 14:28:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1F28FC24 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 14:28:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so5029429pbb.13 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 07:28:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=1d1HKx8nrSMD41pUeMyVP78xwY4JuRfHvxs9y5H22Z0=; b=YDyjIlNTbR9ukyC5cZ7/5Rkg/hdRImachs6qlwd/6vrnzH8Fj9NpcjEDJAzL+nOwHP dkDDPHnw5ooPkho8XsnB6ShRy/ThGtRTnHCxXZDNPP55OhmWcRvgJhgE4klydOxI22XP I2OgphPaXm5hpm8PyE+MyT8USz06gIGD8cdKJwBsIhkgQBbbi2wZ2bWEi6nj7RRIZ45o uS7/6JiLS10FleI3MMtxV+ChSoK89HHamMVNUj/vcmaN2GpjdUveYOlK9d0VjIwCzOfQ zW4ywPorUXUWHf8EVTiOp13eZohjJZaCap/FqKPiuj0ZaKvHDPfvAjH5BJxhhG/x/stD 0j7g== Received: by 10.68.237.198 with SMTP id ve6mr5553399pbc.116.1336832898814; Sat, 12 May 2012 07:28:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Naga (ool-45745da6.dyn.optonline.net. [69.116.93.166]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id rj4sm16140451pbc.30.2012.05.12.07.28.17 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 12 May 2012 07:28:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 10:27:52 -0400 From: Chris Brennan (lists) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20120512102752.009f9363b377c3a9a7ffa0d8@xaerolimit.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0beta6 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Sat__12_May_2012_10_27_52_-0400_6=0pDgXQSXFqgzC3" X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkPM/mQ2xnkdcZd/4xEmGfr+Bu1NbHX4xDAkrQJpt1Z6vsEPU4LruiWtLLQZ/av9UjnmDfE Subject: Wierd install (kinda) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 14:28:19 -0000 --Signature=_Sat__12_May_2012_10_27_52_-0400_6=0pDgXQSXFqgzC3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is a new way of setting up a machine for me, I have no more smaller spare hard-drives to setup as a system boot/root drive for my FreeBSD machine (they are all dead), but what I do have is a 2GB CF card, the rest of the system is being housed on a ZFS array. My goal is to boot the FreeBSD9 bootstick img and install just what I need to the CF card, but I am unsure of exactly how to go about this. I only want what I need on the card and no more and then have it mounted RO at boot (will I have the option then to remount it RW if I need to make changes later?) The host system is am AMD64 machine w/ 6GB of RAM, it has 6 SATA drives of varying sizes, the smallest being 500GB, the largest being 1TB, The ZFS array is 3 750GB SATA drives in a ZFS-backed/run raid5 array (raidz or raiz2 I think is what it's called.) They all have important data them so they cannot be touched/modified in any way by the installer. P.S. I know my signature dosn't match my public key, I haven't added this e-mail yet (it's on my TODO list!) -- Chris Brennan | http://xaerolimit.net | http://xaerolimit.net/forum > A: Yes. > >Q: Are you sure? > >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? > http://xkcd.com/84/ | http://xkcd.com/149/ | http://xkcd.com/549/ > GPG: D5B20C0C (6741 8EE4 6C7D 11FB 8DA8 9E4A EECD 9A84 D5B2 0C0C) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --Signature=_Sat__12_May_2012_10_27_52_-0400_6=0pDgXQSXFqgzC3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPrnNwAAoJEO7NmoTVsgwMoEoH/2wlLzPu4CJ3crmVdA6WjIUE 7Nz3nuNgKOGggoFlP+cr4naHi04HgChUwm887+2utIj6HyjzstimKdZluthiymTj 0fZ9ZVEa7XpOOGn6uzv153nO1sIbsZeaRVaCWBAR0vj52l5bmg6tK0ht5SglDgkS zPe12E0MPgk/H/yHVpXDVZbgI+Vi4aUuVYuEjv/spFapuwj9j6e17eBPZdNI72sI 8uVd/QRY4LC1QaTp3PZZbIIRm4kPHpezQibHmuJjf77fe98sB6/3D2Ew6hkzqlVX UUlC9KUY1xi0JgLCDRHOv0yuh30niosdeKDUDrMJS16UHE9Bc6z4RLHRPH8at/o= =yiaK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sat__12_May_2012_10_27_52_-0400_6=0pDgXQSXFqgzC3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 12 14:37:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019981065673 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 14:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from four.troublesome.heads@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB818FC0C for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 14:37:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbon10 with SMTP id n10so3456135lbo.13 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 07:37:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JKFJMBbRf9s6C9UwAim54FfAzZb+rkjRlkVSFz4ZIJU=; b=lc4pxnCR6qbm1E2dBy50b45Jn5HpO9td9xSsWax2iyorTiKx2qN4xh0LQ4yd+NEM+C /IlKIpuzo0/lZ8u09lov1+0YlWx9eUsgciiE+VOv2H9zI7PT0iZWnZnP1YP8rn1UeJcB uyZXsUzjrIwdjRFg+0SZLt+3JNQlBZCRKZ1AJGBGQXZJ679DrdCQmsMZJP9ZffynS+li eApxp26DQQH/jOz2N9MthkaddapyYOHzEfKpMm0vNeqGZcsiDyBMfD3HDDce7ir2rIbd JZdb8Ld41Bg7h6LaYIjXrYklxtn6DHGtmqg/HudeFl5xz5BMKvWVvds/X0uQF8Zhq20p 9LkA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.146.129 with SMTP id tc1mr1905835lab.27.1336833420202; Sat, 12 May 2012 07:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.96.36 with HTTP; Sat, 12 May 2012 07:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 23:37:00 +0900 Message-ID: From: fake fake To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: file permission template X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 14:37:02 -0000 I need a sort of file permission template. Under some particular directory (like ~/secret), I need all those files (including newly creating one) mode 700. Is there any template-trick? Or "chmod -R 700" every time? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 12 14:48:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155221065670 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 14:48:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AFC8FC0C for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 14:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so4387040yhg.13 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 07:48:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=YJEYrmvFfTXKMcCHqDGRMDvdfD2yqTFQGX3CZWnKkm4=; b=K9UtJuOUDIhi7koC6u8cJJEqAqhFdsawY+vg3X5h8UB2mscR8rleabVZL9ot9Cj7qv FMD5j/NTpy8ZGnG62UyBzrEZZ40XQ9hDFVyI6F9mpOiXOk1FumaauyXsDe4k80x1TON3 c9W+Pe39WVMYKwH+2unVjiC3LWvP+PWVOLWnHLceMQmnoSJG/UTuAbj62CYEzRV4R/BD pu4Rk7FuKt7vpNzjfw567Z4aghzb3si9lM/A3E1q00VbSVrjyeejawoKDXRAqD1wzfhm DOlEqjSo2qvCLivKvo80J1FiPfrFi5NqDt4AFClXbqgjtQCjpzFU7HeXMrzKH0qnGYT+ WgvA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.181.5 with SMTP id k5mr1917949yhm.61.1336834098033; Sat, 12 May 2012 07:48:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.103.51 with HTTP; Sat, 12 May 2012 07:48:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 07:48:17 -0700 Message-ID: From: Michael Sierchio To: fake fake Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlz5QiEPwKPtPvXHC5udiHJlv7Sopm8BbWU+CHgJQfakXLcItuiO+xtM/5fdUaKvg/flWvk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: file permission template X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 14:48:19 -0000 man sh (or man csh) - look for 'umask' On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:37 AM, fake fake wrote: > I need a sort of file permission template. > Under some particular directory (like ~/secret), I need all those > files (including newly creating one) mode 700. > Is there any template-trick? Or "chmod -R 700" every time? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 12 15:15:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2AA91065670 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 15:15:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from four.troublesome.heads@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507518FC17 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 15:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by laai10 with SMTP id i10so2308668laa.13 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 08:15:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+pp59OvNCoYKYWbPRSRlDO7BHV1KrlBZTVV/tsK5OF4=; b=p8DZzhAV5fmHkbQ55U3lhT5Jm8RQVUBgzXvj8DPOGUDk95mWdlxcRpnP0i4rEf7Oz3 RVBrbw7kCbvkpUpTS4LjXy1kQBpQC+nfNjFAldU/OyflN9d1JeXbf1gd8iREeN3aLGVI OG8LXmz1YgzUVljLSjSIrBCs7D54ZLAVLfWewtstHn5tvloaIK9RFQEwx1ry0b7KDiU1 XTOztqE1sYT+XCkRwKitmQT2Cb1nzfsDb3LUbNqnyH/UduXvvlCSRGOBA70wFJhfUxQC JBgH5Xi4EU9wUnEqq1Chh1q2QniT1whynHzoA/KBQCK5RtCMbf1k+ilE+vconAmvL9Eh em/w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.146.129 with SMTP id tc1mr2003829lab.27.1336835754038; Sat, 12 May 2012 08:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.96.36 with HTTP; Sat, 12 May 2012 08:15:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 00:15:54 +0900 Message-ID: From: fake fake To: Michael Sierchio Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: file permission template X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 15:15:55 -0000 Thanks. But I need specific directory only. umask way seems to set mode not only under ~/secret but other directories like ~/public. Is there any elegant way? 2012/5/12 Michael Sierchio : > man sh (or man csh) - look for 'umask' > > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:37 AM, fake fake > wrote: >> I need a sort of file permission template. >> Under some particular directory (like ~/secret), I need all those >> files (including newly creating one) mode 700. >> Is there any template-trick? Or "chmod -R 700" every time? >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 12 15:18:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2066B1065674 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 15:18:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D458F8FC0C for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 15:18:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666893D129; Sat, 12 May 2012 17:17:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q4CFHwdO002642; Sat, 12 May 2012 17:17:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 17:17:58 +0200 From: Polytropon To: fake fake Message-Id: <20120512171758.c83218f2.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: file permission template X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 15:18:06 -0000 On Sat, 12 May 2012 23:37:00 +0900, fake fake wrote: > I need a sort of file permission template. > Under some particular directory (like ~/secret), I need all those > files (including newly creating one) mode 700. > Is there any template-trick? Or "chmod -R 700" every time? Depending on your shell, there is a "umask" command that can be used as a "template". For example, if you're using the default dialog shell csh, put the required "umask Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADC5106564A for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 15:43:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976938FC08 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 15:43:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-20-192.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.20.192]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84B33CEAD; Sat, 12 May 2012 17:43:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q4CFhQBf002730; Sat, 12 May 2012 17:43:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 17:43:26 +0200 From: Polytropon To: fake fake Message-Id: <20120512174326.62b4594f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: file permission template X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 15:43:27 -0000 On Sun, 13 May 2012 00:15:54 +0900, fake fake wrote: > Thanks. But I need specific directory only. > umask way seems to set mode not only under ~/secret but other > directories like ~/public. You're sure you want to have something _public_ in your home directory? > Is there any elegant way? Depends on how the files are created. A possibility is to set umask prior to creating files, and resetting it to its previous value when being done. If files are created automatically, this could be done by a shell script. Such a script could also be used to "copy to secure directory", performing the cp and the chmod step. However, is there any problem _for your particular case_ that setting secret/ to rwx/-/- only, and leaving the files inside with the default umask rw/r/r? Maybe there really is a more elegant way. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 12 16:21:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504B1106566C for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 16:21:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF2D8FC19 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 16:21:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id q4CGMrxH045913 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 11:22:53 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 11:22:53 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201205121622.q4CGMrxH045913@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: file permission template X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 16:21:30 -0000 > I need a sort of file permission template. > Under some particular directory (like ~/secret), I need all those > files (including newly creating one) mode 700. > Is there any template-trick? Or "chmod -R 700" every time? As usual, 'insufficient data'. created 'by whom', and 'how'? some starting points: a) 'man umask'. b) 'man 2 chmod', c) see also how the 'setuid' bit works on directories note if '~/secret' is mode 700, no one other than the owner can list the files in it (or any subdirectory), nor can they use it in a path name. Is this sufficient? If not, exactly _what_ are you trying to accomplish? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 12 19:01:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECA01065675; Sat, 12 May 2012 19:01:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6028FC14; Sat, 12 May 2012 19:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.204.138.246] (helo=tiny.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1STHZR-0003LR-2o; Sat, 12 May 2012 21:01:37 +0200 Received: from tiny.Sisis.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q4CJ1YcS001404; Sat, 12 May 2012 21:01:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q4CJ1XTS001403; Sat, 12 May 2012 21:01:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: tiny.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 21:01:33 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120512190132.GA1361@tiny> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r226986 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.138.246 Cc: Subject: Sony ebook reader with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 19:01:39 -0000 Hello, It seems that the Sony ebook readers internaly run some kind of Linux (MontaVista Linux). I heared someone saying that there are images for eeprom out there to get access to the Linux system itself. Is there any work in progress to install FreeBSD on this (or any other ebook reader). They have a real nice greyscale display of 600x800 to read epub or PDF, even in daylight sun, and as they now also have Wifi on board, it would be nice to combine this with access to mail by some alpha MUA, for example mutt... Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 12 23:21:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCAA106564A for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 23:21:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cjr@cruwe.de) Received: from cruwe.de (cruwe.de [188.40.164.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67FE8FC0A for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 23:21:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cruwe.de (unknown [127.0.0.4]) by cruwe.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3CAA14EDF for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 23:21:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by cruwe.de (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 84E9914EDE; Sat, 12 May 2012 23:21:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.cruwe.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from dijkstra.cruwe.de (p57BDE706.dip.t-dialin.net [87.189.231.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cruwe.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F43714EDB for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 23:21:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 01:21:30 +0200 From: "Christopher J. Ruwe" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120513012130.64d78c1f@dijkstra.cruwe.de> In-Reply-To: <20120512144918.715616f0@dijkstra.cruwe.de> References: <20120512144918.715616f0@dijkstra.cruwe.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV on mail.cruwe.de using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: dlink dwl-122g e1 on 9-stable, working only partially? (or not at all?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 23:21:36 -0000 On Sat, 12 May 2012 14:49:18 +0200 "Christopher J. Ruwe" wrote: > Currently I am fighting with (against?) a dlink dwl-g122 usb wlan > dongle. The casing is claiming the thing to be of H/W-version E1, > F/W-version 5.00, which I interpret as hardware and firmware. > > I am running 9-stable (FreeBSD ritchie.cruwe.de 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD > 9.0-STABLE #8 r235064: Fri May 11 21:32:52 CEST 2012 > cjr@ritchie.cruwe.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RITCHIE amd64) and > admittedly, dwl-g122 is not included in the hw-compatibility list for > 9.0. > > I am also aware that others have been unsuccessful, though some time > back, to get dlw-g122 e running > (http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=27123). > > However, I am somewhat successful in getting the dongle recognized by > if_run.ko, though not to work as I would like to: > > dmesg gives then > > [...] > ugen0.3: at usbus0 > run0: on usbus0 > run0: MAC/BBP RT3070 (rev 0x0201), RF RT2020 (MIMO 1T1R), address > b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by > hand for now. wlan0: Ethernet address: b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec > run0: firmware RT2870 ver. 0.236 loaded > ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by hand for now. > wlan0: Ethernet address: b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec > run0: firmware RT2870 ver. 0.236 loaded > run0: firmware RT2870 ver. 0.236 loaded > ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by hand for now. > wlan0: Ethernet address: b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec > run0: firmware RT2870 ver. 0.236 loaded > ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by hand for now. > wlan0: Ethernet address: b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec > run0: firmware RT2870 ver. 0.236 loaded > run0: firmware RT2870 ver. 0.236 loaded > ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by hand for now. > wlan0: Ethernet address: b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec > ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by hand for now. > wlan0: Ethernet address: b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec > run0: firmware RT2870 ver. 0.236 loaded > ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by hand for now. > wlan0: Ethernet address: b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec > run0: firmware RT2870 ver. 0.236 loaded > wlan0: ieee80211_new_state_locked: pending RUN -> SCAN transition lost > wlan: mac acl policy registered > > I have no explanation for the multiple occurrences, I have been trying > for some time now, though. > > After > > sudo ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev run0 wlanmode hostap > sudo ifconfig wlan0 inet 192.168.3.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ssid bsdap > channel - > > I get > > run0: flags=8a43 > metric 0 mtu 2290 > ether b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec > nd6 options=29 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g > status: running > wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 > mtu 1500 ether b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec > inet6 fe80::baa3:86ff:fe97:c1ec%wlan0 prefixlen 64 scopeid > 0xb inet 192.168.3.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.3.255 > nd6 options=29 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g > status: running > ssid bsdap channel 1 (2412 MHz 11g) bssid b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec > regdomain ETSI country DE authmode OPEN privacy OFF deftxkey 2 > TKIP 2:128-bit TKIP 3:128-bit txpower 30 scanvalid 60 protmode > CTS wme > dtimperiod 1 -dfs > > > This looks quite reasonable to me, however, I have been unsuccessful > so far to get the ssid bsdap to appear on any scan done from the > prospective clients (one 9-stable notebook, two Linux notebooks and > one Nexus S android). > > Does anyone have an idea what is left to try or should I give up and > look for another solution to build a wireless-capable router? > > Thanks in advance, cheers and have a nice weekend, > -- > Christopher > TZ GMT + 2h > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" OK, update on the situation: I can get wlan to work in AP-mode, I must not enable WPA, though. Having enabled hostapd for one time kills my wlan and requires a complete reboot. This situation is somewhat better than what I thought before, i.e., if_run supports dlink dwl-122 e1. However, I really need to secure my wireless network. Can anybody point me in a direction where to look for that hostapd issue? Thanks, cheers, Christopher