From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 19 02:16:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FFC106564A for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 02:16:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75ED08FC0A for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 02:16:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ialo14 with SMTP id o14so1989261ial.13 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:16:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=NLEr6yE8yBQMaU35mCrT2KAzocWxdMj8izfomvOG+ew=; b=l378AD3wmW7ckzBVW0gsMzAt5WghIDcQk3UgZOvGCcAt2m8Ee+3lwRp6HCit028lGR qaBkHkVtvK8xT0A5fpTpOTmuJsZPRIqEGqJNjeD9L6lkBYB9DYdZjOhrHX7U3WFVDDyr QoLz7+VaFJgIMswIkZjXzmkrj8cvttCVjgKPObCxzf3FGCF5VvEAOGRFUUM+7LC9g0lv BQhE2ez380hOjI+E7Y/G+6G4GgWzwv1EgHX33S/Q2IFXAwa2pP+8FlydxIfEtisuzHTA RxO/N4i58Tndo8L08tBr6+jIrccyXyBjUwCSf/rQ4Y7fnTNEj62kOHCn+HlBCNEWZbRx Q8aA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.186.131 with SMTP id fk3mr6168120igc.31.1345342569435; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:16:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.18.101 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:16:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201208181825.33758.lumiwa@gmail.com> References: <201208181825.33758.lumiwa@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 21:16:09 -0500 Message-ID: From: Antonio Olivares To: ajtiM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libxul X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 02:16:11 -0000 On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:25 PM, ajtiM wrote: > Hi! > > There are vulnerabilities in libxul-1.9.2 very long time and looks like > nothing is better. Are there a new libxul version somewhere to download, > please? > > > > portaudit -Fda > auditfile.tbz 100% of 79 kB 316 kBps > New database installed. > Database created: Sat Aug 18 18:15:04 CDT 2012 > Affected package: libxul-1.9.2.28_1 > Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities. > Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/dbf338d0-dce5-11e1- > b655-14dae9ebcf89.html > > Affected package: libxul-1.9.2.28_1 > Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities. > Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/bfecf7c1- > af47-11e1-9580-4061862b8c22.html > > Affected package: libxul-1.9.2.28_1 > Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities. > Reference: > http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/380e8c56-8e32-11e1-9580-4061862b8c22.html > > 3 problem(s) in your installed packages found. > > You are advised to update or deinstall the affected package(s) immediately. > Mitja > -------- > http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I was wanting to ask this question for a long time, but you have beaten me to it :) I was going to ask specifically if firefox does depend on libxul that it is necessary? Otherwise, why do we have to see this every time we update our ports? I have seen that there's a configuration option for libxul so that it can install, but using portmaster the option is not the same or not present? Anyone want to take a shot at explaining this never ending libxul-* saga? Regards, Antonio