From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 2 00:22:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700BE106564A for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 00:22:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292798FC0A for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 00:22:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T7xwu-0003i3-7R for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 02:22:00 +0200 Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.21.186.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 02:22:00 +0200 Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 02:22:00 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Walter Hurry Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 00:21:45 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 17 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 30dc37b master) Subject: Wrong version of sources? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 00:22:06 -0000 I am having trouble with virtualbox-ose-additions. This is 9.1-RC1 on amd64 in a VirtualBox VM. It builds from the port (DISTVERSION= 4.1.20), but on reboot, the kernel module refuses to load,, complaining of a version mismatch with the kernel. When I install the binary version (4.1.18) using 'pkg_add -r' it is fine. This induces me to suspect that I have the wrong version of the kernel sources installed. I installed the source tree with csup. My standard- supfile (copied from examples with only the default host changed) says 'tag=RELENG_9'. I must be doing something wrong, but what? Please forgive me if this is a silly question; I am fairly new to FreeBSD, being a refugee from Linux. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 2 02:25:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD21106564A for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 02:25:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce@smtp-5-40.dattaweb.com) Received: from smtp-5-40.dattaweb.com (smtp-5-40.dattaweb.com [200.58.105.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDBC8FC18 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 02:25:45 +0000 (UTC) To: From: AAMI Medicina Integrativa Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 23:12:38 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@envialosimple.com X-Report-Abuse: abuse@envialosimple.com X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced by Envialosimple.com 1.0 X-Mailer: envialosimple.com X-Mailer-MsgId: cXVlc3Rpb25zQGZyZWVic2Qub3Jn X-Mailer-CSID: MzdfMTdfMTI0NTM= Message-ID: <5042c0962de6c@smtp-5-marketing.dattaweb.com> X-DKIM: envialosimple.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; q=dns/txt; l=10928; s=envialo; t=0; c=relaxed/simple; h=From:To:Subject; d=envialosimple.com; z=From:=20AAMI=20Medicina=20Integrativa=20=0A=0D=0A|To:=20=0A=0D=0A|Subject:=20=3D?iso-8859-1?B?Q3Vyc28gSU5URU5TSVZPIGVuIE1lZGljaW5hIElOVEVHUkFUSVZBIC0gU2VkZTogQU1B?=3D=0A=0D=0A; bh=0iZ4qTXNyYUOayHeG2AKa8CRL70=; b=Mq0adxXLObULt98YaFtiWd/A6WCigycq4pG4VaNZZ3dYbpBwNpBYiYzzaLmoaHHI1ByteATPGoZoHUKlc5JuTjHgo/CDEDjYFTKkqFQHuqld6WzD68w0JTfkFaVi2kNluwIyFjxwtofjuCrJFL0jvpsEwH+Psecod8BcaKB74eY= X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - smtp-5-40.dattaweb.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [500 500] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - smtp-1-marketing.dattaweb.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Curso INTENSIVO en Medicina INTEGRATIVA - Sede: AMA X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: AAMI Medicina Integrativa List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 02:25:46 -0000 Si no visualiza correctamente este bolet=EDn, haga =0A=0Aclick aqu=ED (Link= ->http://www.medicinaintegrativa.org.ar/newsletters/2012ama/news01.html) .= =0A=0ACompart=EDr esta publicaci=F3n=0A=0A(Link->http://www.facebook.com/sh= are.php?u=3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fv2.envialosimple.com%2Fcampaign%2Fhtmlversion%3FAd= ministratorID%3D12453%26CampaignID%3D37%26s%3Db91a6de2f3beaafc49d4f66f60994= 9e3&t=3DCurso%20INTENSIVO%20en%20Medicina%20INTEGRATIVA%20-%20Sede%3A%20AMA= &v=3D3&unique=3D0) =0A=0A(Link->http://v2.envialosimple.com/campaign/forwar= d?AdministratorID=3D12453&CampaignID=3D37&StatisticID=3D17&MemberID=3D36617= &s=3Da78c2e7e56c6b8adbc6eb1f9ef83c484&isDemo=3D0) =0A=0APara desuscribirse = de nuestra lista haga =0A=0AClick aqu=ED (Link->http://v2.envialosimple.com= /member/publicunsubscribe?AdministratorID=3D12453&MemberID=3D36617&Statisti= cID=3D17&CampaignID=3D37&isDemo=3D0&MailListsIds[]=3D2&MailListsIds[]=3D3&M= ailListsIds[]=3D4&MailListsIds[]=3D5&MailListsIds[]=3D6&MailListsIds[]=3D8&= MailListsIds[]=3D9&MailListsIds[]=3D10&MailListsIds[]=3D11&MailListsIds[]= =3D13&MailListsIds[]=3D14&s=3Da4dc05fe1c9c84f90e66b00870cc73c2) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 2 05:37:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61AF9106564A for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 05:37:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alphachi@mediaspirit.org) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC388FC15 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 05:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by weyx56 with SMTP id x56so3027656wey.13 for ; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 22:37:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=RR1IZF6o6gO7/pQje2I5yUnjiAuO6NqMvyiOYNdMGSs=; b=IvgyHklz9NYLMTaFkTXeexXARYgWP8SZ0gt3w57IhIsX9TJj0ZoEJSbErUznV6tmML DdiR4U2LuWbs6pdfp/gGHcfAqQ2i8R6t8wkf/pMkNJK5Kk+8wm4Fvb6E1l2z+xCDpDIG Nbxh7VnndT/Ba/BZLXQowxTFgdiuUMW7rpKojvqNqrpQi4wf+XtadG0e1OGvz7a07DRd leE3PXtQW3aNtEOE46U+vDQYUs5pc6y2GAZRdDawUWNbC+s0ijvK2UFY2pLaEJEEakAm uvwRp4G3LN1fDXNAYVLSCpI1BfDx5iq++g00KmBwR3oerNEmWl/73Jpzx6JTcH+JgKTq 2Hgw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.24.197 with SMTP id w5mr14887650wif.22.1346564254513; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 22:37:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.87.11 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 22:37:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201209011709.46974.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> References: <201209011709.46974.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 13:37:34 +0800 Message-ID: From: alphachi To: David Naylor X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlZck5H6dFfIUqE8abJ47ULBAXxW41TYG0l/JVB5LmVZWq2ZRoh00SIvWIk1gTuc6adOybF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.12 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 05:37:37 -0000 2012/9/1 David Naylor > Hi, > > Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.5.12 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. > The > packages for FreeBSD 10 use the pkgng [3] format. > > There are many reports that wine does not work with a clang compiled world > (help in fixing this problem is appreciated as it affects quite a few > users). > > The patch [4] for nVidia users is now included in the package and is run on > installation (if the relevant files are accessible). Please read the > installation messages for further information. > > Regards, > > David > > [1] > MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.5.12,1.tbz) = > 335ef444a2f6f375dd22cf932b651919 > MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.5.12,1.txz) = > e06673c4ab9a0bb82a7d48dad5b8877f > MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd10/wine-fbsd64-1.5.12,1.txz) = > aafe06b15176f810c25cbf708c11aabb > [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 > [3] http://wiki.freebsd.org/pkgng > [4] The patch is located at /usr/local/share/wine/patch-nvidia.sh > Hi David, I have pkg_add wine-fbsd64-1.5.12,1.txz and run /usr/local/share/wine/patch- nvidia.sh; everything is OK. When running wine, the error msg is: wine: failed to initialize: /usr/local/lib32/wine/ntdll.dll.so: Undefined symbol "_ThreadRuneLocale" What shall I do? Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 2 05:51:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA221065677 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 05:51:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander.kapshuk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445D88FC1B for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 05:51:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbgg13 with SMTP id gg13so2373880lbb.13 for ; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 22:51:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=te0LKM3E9pdoRcpCB835iiOsjI81bx6rlroo1SyZs8Y=; b=h2OZauG+bNYQaGI1FZ3xmyHRw8xues1x4XyQUgZlsnT044FRHw+I6HXqHct+1ya+sG mAxoSqdLjoGMnxMSKJ0a/7q8K8qN/qWpbnlqyFsDohfxqYBGPvlQYdLP7x0ObJwQ+g8D EdI4dvE3i8+6jsaSzFlz+7XpIX9atTleOmOldAthGk+Rnk9t8hEkMA0NtAnZ8H0znueh LwVXYWIW4/E3WyTdhw4l4ronT2snVOjnFmHVqKnmyMbJc7aDh7bR8h3fXzULcPW9DpOV jzYRgC8C/hw1Mt5bfhZyBc/N2eWmVzBnGYPgTGCFoDw6zIRGWBuWfM2q+cSHCOB4EaH1 Bu4Q== Received: by 10.152.110.46 with SMTP id hx14mr10494168lab.21.1346565094748; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 22:51:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (93-127-96-97.static.vega-ua.net. [93.127.96.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y4sm2328277lbg.5.2012.09.01.22.51.34 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 01 Sep 2012 22:51:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5042F3E5.7040409@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 08:51:33 +0300 From: Alexander Kapshuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20120726 Icedove/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Wrong version of sources? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 05:51:36 -0000 On 09/02/2012 03:21 AM, Walter Hurry wrote: > My standard- > supfile (copied from examples with only the default host changed) says > 'tag=RELENG_9'. > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html RELENG_9 The line of development for FreeBSD-9.X, also known as FreeBSD 9-STABLE You're running 9.1-RC1, which doesn't have the RELENG_9_1 tag available yet, as this is a release candidate. Thus the trouble when compiling VBox from sources. Have you rebuilt your kernel and the world once you'd pulled in the sources for RELENG_9? Anyway, that's my take on it. Alexander Kapshuk. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 2 11:24:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E23C1065674; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 11:24:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20248FC18; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 11:24:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so3287640wgb.31 for ; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 04:24:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=KoKd8QzwkzRX94eWUBf+bJc1IVmlkkNnkiKo16K5+u4=; b=XC37d84xZC1XP4IFkOYsyqCrhhBICwyOefmKneRq7CM9dEM40mhn4WvUbfV57UOq4r fK3xqKselg1QmF+LLtfiNH1abrjMZVLDDcNGMo8tj6UJjYOs/efuqZqkPzvFdQVFK1VC +O9Hn6cXDkzObS7RLwUVQPTzOEBoF0LH0X1Gkt2Vi5QWP7U8qE5DmZikbHlI6Hz5eo3d Qg0a/KXJPD94t8oV7fyPhb09MwVT5AmxfbMuPjnXZa932fcXDzHQWG2GdU6I8O0nmLCr xLMs6ScewqYog1nhiFrbKeEEfVBu/ehgzLHl7+useS5bRoR3SnC/Lehn/q/tsSOZfYxp b9Kw== Received: by 10.180.95.193 with SMTP id dm1mr16350895wib.10.1346585064789; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 04:24:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.dg (41-135-0-219.dsl.mweb.co.za. [41.135.0.219]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l6sm12688260wiz.4.2012.09.02.04.24.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 02 Sep 2012 04:24:24 -0700 (PDT) From: David Naylor To: alphachi Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 13:24:14 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.8.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201209011709.46974.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart12706326.C1vWn2vbDk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201209021324.17945.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.12 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 11:24:27 -0000 --nextPart12706326.C1vWn2vbDk Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday, 2 September 2012 07:37:34 alphachi wrote: > 2012/9/1 David Naylor >=20 > > Hi, > >=20 > > Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.5.12 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. > >=20 > > The > >=20 > > packages for FreeBSD 10 use the pkgng [3] format. > >=20 > > There are many reports that wine does not work with a clang compiled > > world (help in fixing this problem is appreciated as it affects quite a > > few users). > >=20 > > The patch [4] for nVidia users is now included in the package and is run > > on installation (if the relevant files are accessible). Please read the > > installation messages for further information. > >=20 > > Regards, > >=20 > > David > >=20 > > [1] > >=20 > > MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.5.12,1.tbz) =3D > > =20 > > 335ef444a2f6f375dd22cf932b651919 > > =20 > > MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.5.12,1.txz) =3D > > =20 > > e06673c4ab9a0bb82a7d48dad5b8877f > > =20 > > MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd10/wine-fbsd64-1.5.12,1.txz) =3D > > =20 > > aafe06b15176f810c25cbf708c11aabb > >=20 > > [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 > > [3] http://wiki.freebsd.org/pkgng > > [4] The patch is located at /usr/local/share/wine/patch-nvidia.sh >=20 > Hi David, Hi > I have pkg_add wine-fbsd64-1.5.12,1.txz and run > /usr/local/share/wine/patch- nvidia.sh; everything is OK. >=20 > When running wine, the error msg is: > wine: failed to initialize: /usr/local/lib32/wine/ntdll.dll.so: Undefined > symbol "_ThreadRuneLocale" >=20 > What shall I do? Thanks! Could you please answer some questions: - Are you running FreeBSD 9 or 10? - When last did you update world? - Are you using clang for any compilation (of world, ports, etc) - How did you run wine? Could please run the followings commands, and provide the output: # uname -a # winecfg # regedit also please run the program that tripped wine up. =20 Some things you could try [the following long shots] (although I have no id= ea=20 what the root cause is til I get further information): - Have a look at http://markmail.org/thread/5kt24py6q2w2ageq - Update to the latest -stable or -current code - If you were using clang then switch to gcc and do a full rebuild Regards --nextPart12706326.C1vWn2vbDk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAlBDQeEACgkQUaaFgP9pFrK3bgCfd4TUxNp3onp5EXMg9/Pfcbio K6EAnRGFbXI3heTKee/f8kEEWCTkoljv =JwAX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart12706326.C1vWn2vbDk-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 2 13:19:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93307106566B for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 13:19:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0D78FC15 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 13:19:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T8A5l-0001WI-BP for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 15:19:57 +0200 Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.21.186.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 15:19:57 +0200 Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 15:19:57 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Walter Hurry Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 13:19:44 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <5042F3E5.7040409@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 30dc37b master) Subject: Re: Wrong version of sources? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 13:19:56 -0000 On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 08:51:33 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On 09/02/2012 03:21 AM, Walter Hurry wrote: >> My standard- >> supfile (copied from examples with only the default host changed) says >> 'tag=RELENG_9'. >> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html > RELENG_9 The line of development for FreeBSD-9.X, also known as FreeBSD > 9-STABLE > > You're running 9.1-RC1, which doesn't have the RELENG_9_1 tag available > yet, as this is a release candidate. Thus the trouble when compiling > VBox from sources. > > Have you rebuilt your kernel and the world once you'd pulled in the > sources for RELENG_9? > > Anyway, that's my take on it. Thanks for the reply. No, I haven't rebuilt kernel and world, nor do I intend to for the moment. I'm happy to stick with generic. I'm still slightly confused by this "tag" stuff though; sorry (despite perusal of the handbook). Are you saying that until RELENG_9_1 is made available I won't be able to compile kernel modules? Or that I should have a different tag in my standard-supfile? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 2 13:33:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46BE106566C for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 13:33:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (kontrol.kode5.net [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125368FC08 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 13:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q82DXOWB053168 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 14:33:25 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q82DXOCT053167 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 14:33:24 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) X-Authentication-Warning: kontrol.kode5.net: jamie set sender to jamie@kode5.net using -f Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 14:33:24 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120902133324.GG54669@kontrol.kode5.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5042F3E5.7040409@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: x-operating-system: FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE amd64 x-pgp-fingerprint: A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38 x-pgp-key: 1D31DC38 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.5 at kontrol.kode5.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: Wrong version of sources? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 13:33:27 -0000 [ Walter Hurry wrote on Sun 2.Sep'12 at 13:19:44 +0000 ] > On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 08:51:33 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > > On 09/02/2012 03:21 AM, Walter Hurry wrote: > >> My standard- > >> supfile (copied from examples with only the default host changed) says > >> 'tag=RELENG_9'. > >> > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html > > RELENG_9 The line of development for FreeBSD-9.X, also known as FreeBSD > > 9-STABLE > > > > You're running 9.1-RC1, which doesn't have the RELENG_9_1 tag available > > yet, as this is a release candidate. Thus the trouble when compiling > > VBox from sources. > > > > Have you rebuilt your kernel and the world once you'd pulled in the > > sources for RELENG_9? > > > > Anyway, that's my take on it. > > Thanks for the reply. No, I haven't rebuilt kernel and world, nor do I > intend to for the moment. I'm happy to stick with generic. > > I'm still slightly confused by this "tag" stuff though; sorry (despite > perusal of the handbook). Are you saying that until RELENG_9_1 is made > available I won't be able to compile kernel modules? Or that I should > have a different tag in my standard-supfile? To have the 9.1-RC1 source code, use the stable-supfile in /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ and build world and kernel using that source tree. That will give you a 9.1-RC1 system. So that would be a RELENG_9 tag if you look in that stable-supfile. Then, when 9.1-RELEASE is officially released, you'd use the standard-supfile which uses a RELENG_9_1 tag if you wanted to stay with the -RELEASE brach. Or you could just continue to track stable branch and keep the RELENG_9 tag. That's what I am doing currently although I intend on tracking stable branch anyway, i.e. after 9.1-RELEASE has been made available. Jamie. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 2 13:45:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A2F106564A for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 13:45:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander.kapshuk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F154C8FC08 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 13:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbgg13 with SMTP id gg13so2496074lbb.13 for ; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 06:45:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Oe/ql7/3PXPPsq/PD3MaZ/HIe2Kp+007IlI9Jtud/0o=; b=j8Xch+yMCRL7UocE3y5Tx+UqNPsEbZlTyWpkFZNsax9ccR9Z1Tf5b1Ox6c8BkAUHoa mZUvR8V6e3wHs0ULPjvpX8qB6l7lyTJbNERTgax0thNUcMCBNZzCZMh9st7MEZqtXbs1 5wnI1d1UJoMO5tnRzXnTrVWIMoPGuEMCQpaMQYG4zqpxRVqIhToJezVjGd4cf08mPIwB B/5zBmeKkb6UTuAoJMrlNbtRM8yvsfaPi67NogNOSXUhezuXay0A4ZuL0KwcOd/bu21m VdJvyptzpEk9bgmZPdfW+n/Lje57n48buRRsUo8cE53mTFnqHUFQY4aGXH0cWO0RYn0B nHLw== Received: by 10.152.112.234 with SMTP id it10mr11410236lab.36.1346593502457; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 06:45:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (93-127-96-97.static.vega-ua.net. [93.127.96.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ba4sm2556253lbb.14.2012.09.02.06.45.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 02 Sep 2012 06:45:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <504362DD.4040609@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 16:45:01 +0300 From: Alexander Kapshuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120831 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5042F3E5.7040409@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Wrong version of sources? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 13:45:04 -0000 On 09/02/12 16:19, Walter Hurry wrote: > Thanks for the reply. No, I haven't rebuilt kernel and world, nor do I > intend to for the moment. I'm happy to stick with generic. By using the RELENG_9 tag, you're tracking the STABLE development branch. By pulling in the sources for the STABLE development branch and rebuilding the kernel and the world by following the instructions given in the Handbook, you are sticking with the GENERIC kernel configuration, unless you build a custom kernel. > > I'm still slightly confused by this "tag" stuff though; sorry (despite > perusal of the handbook). Are you saying that until RELENG_9_1 is made > available I won't be able to compile kernel modules? Or that I should > have a different tag in my standard-supfile? That's right. RELENG_9_1 isn't available yet. The options available to you now, as far as I can tell, are: (1). Do not recompile the kernel and the world, if you want to track 9.1-RC, to be followed by RELENG_9_1, once it becomes available. You may use freebsd-update(8), to keep the system up-to-date by way of binary updates. Once release 9.1 is out, you may change RELENG_9 in your sup-file to RELENG_9_1, and then you'll be tracking the release branch and you'll be able to keep the kernel and the world up-to-date by way of source updates. Use pkg_add(1) to install VBox. (2). Stick with RELENG_9, which is the STABLE development branch. Pull in the latest sources. Rebuild the kernel and the world. You may be prompted to rebuild the ports installed on your system as well. Use pkg_add(1) or the ports to install software. If any one else on the list thinks otherwise, as they are more experienced folk on the list than I, I'd be happy to stand corrected. Hope the above helps. Alexander Kapshuk. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 2 13:49:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E771065670 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 13:49:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231FC8FC12 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 13:49:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.local (host86-143-181-80.range86-143.btcentralplus.com [86.143.181.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q82Dn22K023492 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 14:49:03 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q82Dn22K023492 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q82Dn22K023492; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host host86-143-181-80.range86-143.btcentralplus.com [86.143.181.80] claimed to be seedling.local Message-ID: <504363C6.9030709@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 14:48:54 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <5042F3E5.7040409@gmail.com> <20120902133324.GG54669@kontrol.kode5.net> In-Reply-To: <20120902133324.GG54669@kontrol.kode5.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig640F15187E6E256C62A2C5C9" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT, RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Subject: Re: Wrong version of sources? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 13:49:08 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig640F15187E6E256C62A2C5C9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/09/2012 14:33, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: > To have the 9.1-RC1 source code, use the stable-supfile in > /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ and build world and kernel using that > source tree. That will give you a 9.1-RC1 system. So that would be a > RELENG_9 tag if you look in that stable-supfile. Then, when > 9.1-RELEASE is officially released, you'd use the standard-supfile > which uses a RELENG_9_1 tag if you wanted to stay with the -RELEASE > brach. Or you could just continue to track stable branch and keep the > RELENG_9 tag. While this advice was correct for all previous FreeBSD releases, cvsup(8) support for 9.1-RELEASE is not going to be provided. See this message from re@: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-August/069233.html= Ken Smith wrote: > With both the doc and ports repositories now moved to SVN it has been > decided to not export the 9.1 release branch activity to CVS. So > csup/cvsup update mechanisms are not available for updating to 9.1-RC1.= > If you would like to use SVN the branch to use is releng/9.1. Instead, you will be able to use freebsd-update to track 9.1-RELEASE (including system sources), or you can use SVN to follow the releng/9.1 branch. You will still be able to use cvsup to track RELENG_9 aka. 9.1-STABLE aka. stable/9. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig640F15187E6E256C62A2C5C9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlBDY84ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwpAgCfegzkw62VVzMppV8iAO0De6dF JlcAoIoFEpyXU+Tosp5HZM0ZbKs3tbX8 =lo1A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig640F15187E6E256C62A2C5C9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 2 23:05:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74DF51065670 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 23:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from levitch@iglou.com) Received: from rdsmtp.iglou.com (rdsmtp.iglou.com [192.107.41.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329098FC18 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 23:05:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iglou.com; s=alpha; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=VEcUnSzAN8vBYntWxTlPVu0JtX8Ps3AnRpOUVk/V+Cc=; b=AnbtDB67DCTSC2YmJ/mKQMbB9C/g/Sr63joeEdjww/hsmOHeVoRq+Cbs5Jppjb0ljpvKbbGFE/Hoz5iBN4G/El0UGTR0X+XiFkcEQdzC3ElUYfsR833g+JT7eQqnyz40TcpBZ0ekZ0tvBGJQQk8lbwKgHOUW0/vpvgYrFXyIoB8=; Received: from iglou1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.3]:48820 helo=mail.iglou.com) by rdsmtp.iglou.com with esmtpa (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T8Isx-0003iX-OE by authid with igloumta_auth for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 18:43:19 -0400 Received: from shell1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.17]:47731 helo=shell1) by mail.iglou.com with esmtps (TLS cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T8Isx-0006nd-DY for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 18:43:19 -0400 Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 18:43:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Darrel X-X-Sender: levitch@shell1 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (GSO 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: 192.107.41.17 X-IgLou-Customer: 3cb6f76205bd20f518810676a67a982b Subject: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 23:05:10 -0000 Hello, If my csup file looks about like this: *default host=this_working_mirror *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9_0 *default delete use-rel-suffix and my machine now has devel/subversion what is the quickest way to get the new release candidate sources with svn? Then, can I simply build{w,k}, install{w,k} as before? Regards, Darrel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 04:02:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550CB106566C for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 04:02:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C638FC08 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 04:02:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 28506459 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 10:02:19 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8332Igi079634 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 10:02:18 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q8332IRQ079633 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 10:02:18 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 10:02:17 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120903030217.GA79339@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Sharing COM ports to Windows hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 04:02:30 -0000 Colleagues, There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone have a success story for such a scenario? There is some software like comms/serialoverip, comms/tits etc but are there any (freeware) Windows virtual COM port drivers compatible therewith? Maybe some Windows drivers for hardware console servers (like Moxa) would work with tits etc? Thanks a lot for any advice. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 06:00:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5011106566B for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 06:00:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C43C8FC18 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 06:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.local (host86-143-181-80.range86-143.btcentralplus.com [86.143.181.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8360UlU042452 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 07:00:31 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q8360UlU042452 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q8360UlU042452; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host host86-143-181-80.range86-143.btcentralplus.com [86.143.181.80] claimed to be seedling.local Message-ID: <50444778.3030302@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 07:00:24 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig56EC60F734BEDDB07532A194" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Subject: Re: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 06:00:35 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig56EC60F734BEDDB07532A194 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/09/2012 23:43, Darrel wrote: > Hello, >=20 > If my csup file looks about like this: >=20 > *default host=3Dthis_working_mirror > *default base=3D/var/db > *default prefix=3D/usr > *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_9_0 > *default delete use-rel-suffix >=20 > and my machine now has devel/subversion >=20 > what is the quickest way to get the new release candidate sources with = svn? >=20 > Then, can I simply build{w,k}, install{w,k} as before? I'm not sure if svn can be made to 'take over' a tree of files already obtained by non-svn means. I believe not. Therefore to get hold of 9.1rc do: # cd /usr # mv src src.old # svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 src and then later on to update your tree with any changes from upstream: # svn up Note: the first time you update from a SVN tree, you'll get a lot of mergemaster false positives, because the format of the $FreeBSD$ VCS id string is different. Use of 'mergemaster -F' is recommended. Et voil=E0. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig56EC60F734BEDDB07532A194 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlBER38ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxX7QCdEdnmvfmbadGQ0sLXivBCXNXw icIAn17TwP/IFMYmhRTcOeSn+KXLr9Ij =DjEG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig56EC60F734BEDDB07532A194-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 06:09:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA0C106564A for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 06:09:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.165]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1479B8FC0A for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 06:09:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.42.139] (helo=smtp8.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T8Odk-0007Us-LD for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 06:52:00 +0200 Received: from 5419839c.cm-5-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([84.25.131.156] helo=ra.egypt.nl) by smtp8.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T8Odk-0000Ot-CV for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 06:52:00 +0200 Received: from [192.168.13.35] (xp.egypt.nl [192.168.13.35]) by ra.egypt.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0438039847 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 06:51:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <50443766.4020705@boosten.org> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 06:51:50 +0200 From: Peter Boosten User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120903030217.GA79339@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> In-Reply-To: <20120903030217.GA79339@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: AVG for E-mail 2012.0.2197 [2437/5242] X-Ziggo-spambar: / X-Ziggo-spamscore: -0.4 X-Ziggo-spamreport: BAYES_00=-1.9, CM_META_TB_NOARR=0.5, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_PASS=-0.001 X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No Subject: Re: Sharing COM ports to Windows hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 06:09:25 -0000 On 3-9-2012 5:02, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Colleagues, > > There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be > accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone > have a success story for such a scenario? > > There is some software like comms/serialoverip, comms/tits etc but are > there any (freeware) Windows virtual COM port drivers compatible > therewith? > > Maybe some Windows drivers for hardware console servers (like Moxa) > would work with tits etc? > > Thanks a lot for any advice. > If I understand your question correctly, then AFAICT the only way to access serial ports over the network is with a piece of additional hardware, like a terminal server, for instance: http://www.perle.com/products/Terminal-Server.shtml?utm_source=ppc&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=server Peter -- http://www.boosten.org ----- Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht. Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com Versie: 2012.0.2197 / Virusdatabase: 2437/5242 - datum van uitgifte: 09/02/12 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 07:07:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302F3106566C for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 07:07:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emss.mail@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41AA8FC08 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 07:07:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by weyx56 with SMTP id x56so3489718wey.13 for ; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 00:07:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:x-virus-scanned:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:x-operating-system:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qfQL1P2UfRFciE/KzIBSNORMwoSBfyhnBptAAcBJrVY=; b=S9BpsLHHxwC9jTClPSkzeUlskhCamJlOwyFh3C0UyxNJs7S4CkfOKPG/0o80MVIE0G WwVgWhfWCDi2jYZMhQu6ih0Eu921CEDSfGBz12XT157q9Ep2FCZECMmsbEBmKfmfLnmv xGYGJMhBofcBVaV2bwCo3HXvkPtBwJf5v4N5R+uQ+Oeiihep+bIhWxizgAD12M/R9HPd LVmRyIYLUUJO3qb577D4Lk+w+uIhDkR93upQ372Y693ED7QFCDwEoi69pPMpaeziAg+I mXpcbXCReiCzXTtHFf+lilv739dP+MDQIJV092vNQhSyoFYWwzySTGKaKki8BbWLfXV1 /Gnw== Received: by 10.180.84.164 with SMTP id a4mr21091146wiz.12.1346656067417; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 00:07:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org (LCaen-151-92-21-48.w217-128.abo.wanadoo.fr. [217.128.200.48]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q4sm17635804wix.9.2012.09.03.00.07.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 03 Sep 2012 00:07:46 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Eric Masson Received: from srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B447CCF0DA; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 09:07:44 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at interne.associated-bears.org Received: from srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org ([127.0.0.1]) by srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org (srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RpduJyi4cTJZ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 09:07:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D022CCF0D5; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 09:07:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Masson To: Victor Sudakov In-Reply-To: <20120903030217.GA79339@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> (Victor Sudakov's message of "Mon, 3 Sep 2012 10:02:17 +0700") References: <20120903030217.GA79339@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (berkeley-unix) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3 amd64 Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 09:07:39 +0200 Message-ID: <86wr0binyc.fsf@srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sharing COM ports to Windows hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 07:07:49 -0000 Victor Sudakov writes: Hi, > There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be > accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone > have a success story for such a scenario? Yes, sredird on the FreeBSD box & NetDialout from PCMicro on the Windows box. > There is some software like comms/serialoverip, comms/tits etc but are > there any (freeware) Windows virtual COM port drivers compatible > therewith? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COM_port_redirector#Open_source_solutions com0com Project's com2tcp may be what you're expecting. Regards Éric Masson -- l'anarchie, c'est pt'etre pas genial comme mode de gouvernement, mais c'est mieux que pas de gouvernement du tout. -+- Kevin in -+- Ni Root, ni Maître. -+- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 07:10:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB21106566B for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 07:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7978FC08 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 07:10:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id q837AdQB033036 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 3 Sep 2012 00:10:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.14.2/Submit) with UUCP id q837AdQH033035; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 00:10:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA02093; Mon, 3 Sep 12 00:06:54 PDT Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 07:06:48 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: peter@boosten.org Message-Id: <5044b978.qFhU35CVsU8J/nET%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20120903030217.GA79339@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <50443766.4020705@boosten.org> In-Reply-To: <50443766.4020705@boosten.org> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sharing COM ports to Windows hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 07:10:41 -0000 Peter Boosten wrote: > On 3-9-2012 5:02, Victor Sudakov wrote: > > There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports > > be accessed by Windows hosts over the network? > > If I understand your question correctly, then AFAICT the only way to > access serial ports over the network is with a piece of additional > hardware, like a terminal server, for instance: > > http://www.perle.com/products/Terminal-Server.shtml?utm_source=ppc&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=server I believe the OP wants to use a FreeBSD machine, that has several serial ports and a network connection, _as_ a terminal server. I can think of no reason why such an arrangement could not be made to work; the question is whether someone has already written the necessary FreeBSD code to accept a telnet/ssh/whatever connection, initiated by a Windows terminal-server driver, and _transparently_ connect the session to a serial port on the FreeBSD machine via tip(1) or some such. (If all that's needed is access from a Windows Command window, it is a simple matter of ssh-ing to the FreeBSD box and then running tip(1).) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 07:24:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D55106566C for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 07:24:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143EE8FC18 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 07:24:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 28509268 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 14:24:51 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q837Oo8p092808 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 14:24:50 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q837OoxZ092807 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 14:24:50 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 14:24:49 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120903072449.GA92658@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20120903030217.GA79339@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <50443766.4020705@boosten.org> <5044b978.qFhU35CVsU8J/nET%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5044b978.qFhU35CVsU8J/nET%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: Sharing COM ports to Windows hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 07:24:53 -0000 perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > > There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports > > > be accessed by Windows hosts over the network? > > > > If I understand your question correctly, then AFAICT the only way to > > access serial ports over the network is with a piece of additional > > hardware, like a terminal server, for instance: > > > > http://www.perle.com/products/Terminal-Server.shtml?utm_source=ppc&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=server > > I believe the OP wants to use a FreeBSD machine, that has several > serial ports and a network connection, _as_ a terminal server. Correct. > > I can think of no reason why such an arrangement could not be made > to work; the question is whether someone has already written the > necessary FreeBSD code to accept a telnet/ssh/whatever connection, There are several in the ports collection. Some even implement RFC2217. Some work and some don't. > initiated by a Windows terminal-server driver, and _transparently_ > connect the session to a serial port on the FreeBSD machine In fact, the question is whether there is a standards compliant (not written for some proprietary hardware terminal server protocol) driver for Windows. Not exactly a FreeBSD question, I know :) -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 07:29:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15583106566C for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 07:29:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555328FC16 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 07:29:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 28509312 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 14:29:20 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q837TKvY092896 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 14:29:20 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q837TKPf092895 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 14:29:20 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 14:29:20 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120903072920.GB92658@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20120903030217.GA79339@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <86wr0binyc.fsf@srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86wr0binyc.fsf@srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org> Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: Sharing COM ports to Windows hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 07:29:23 -0000 Eric Masson wrote: > > > There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be > > accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone > > have a success story for such a scenario? > > Yes, sredird on the FreeBSD box & NetDialout from PCMicro on the Windows > box. Oh, NetDialout is commercial software, but thanks anyway. > > > There is some software like comms/serialoverip, comms/tits etc but are > > there any (freeware) Windows virtual COM port drivers compatible > > therewith? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COM_port_redirector#Open_source_solutions > com0com Project's com2tcp may be what you're expecting. At least it has an example of an RFC 2217 client (COM port to TCP redirector) in its README file. Thanks again, will look at it. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 10:04:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD621065673 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 10:04:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780808FC08 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 10:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-49-179.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.49.179]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E483CDA3; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:03:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q83A3sp0001940; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:03:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:03:54 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Victor Sudakov Message-Id: <20120903120354.293061a0.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120903030217.GA79339@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20120903030217.GA79339@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sharing COM ports to Windows hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 10:04:02 -0000 On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 10:02:17 +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Colleagues, > > There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be > accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone > have a success story for such a scenario? > > There is some software like comms/serialoverip, comms/tits etc but are > there any (freeware) Windows virtual COM port drivers compatible > therewith? > > Maybe some Windows drivers for hardware console servers (like Moxa) > would work with tits etc? It is _easily_ possible, even though my own experiences do not include doing this with "Windows", but with other BSD boxes and even DOS. First you have to enable a serial terminal connection just the same way you handle the virtual terminals in text mode: Edit /etc/ttys and enable the line ttyu0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.19200" dialup on secure Now you can connect to that port via a serial cable, using a terminal emulator (for example Kermit). Make sure you have set the proper speed, 19k2 in this example (faster than the default 9k6). See "man 5 ttys" for examples. If you use a UNIX or Linux client, you can use the "cu" program. See "man cu" for details. However, what you need on "Windows" side is a program that can communicate via serial port. I don't know if such a program is still included in today's "modern" versions of "Windows", but I seem to remember that the 3.11 and 95 versions came with such a program. In worst case, maybe you can use a DOS program like Kermit under "Windows"? I'm sure the compatibility is restricted, but maybe you can give it a try. http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/mskermit.html Note that I haven't tried this with any recent FreeBSD system. But it _was_ possible with FreeBSD 4 and 5. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 10:21:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4001065670 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 10:21:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF128FC12 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 10:21:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 28512718 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 17:20:48 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q83AKmHj097199 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 17:20:48 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q83AKlol097198 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 17:20:47 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 17:20:46 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120903102046.GA97010@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20120903030217.GA79339@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20120903120354.293061a0.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120903120354.293061a0.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: Sharing COM ports to Windows hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 10:21:22 -0000 Polytropon wrote: > > > > There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be > > accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone > > have a success story for such a scenario? > > > > There is some software like comms/serialoverip, comms/tits etc but are > > there any (freeware) Windows virtual COM port drivers compatible > > therewith? > > > > Maybe some Windows drivers for hardware console servers (like Moxa) > > would work with tits etc? > > It is _easily_ possible, even though my own experiences do > not include doing this with "Windows", but with other BSD > boxes and even DOS. > > First you have to enable a serial terminal connection just > the same way you handle the virtual terminals in text mode: > Edit /etc/ttys and enable the line > > ttyu0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.19200" dialup on secure Sorry, Polytropon, you understood the challenge the wrong way around. Have you ever heard of "reverse telnet" and "reverse ssh" (these are terms from the Cisco world though). I am trying to use an existing FreeBSD box as an el cheapo portserver. I don't need to use the Windows box as a serial terminal. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 10:28:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC98106566C for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 10:28:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alphachi@mediaspirit.org) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982D78FC12 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 10:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by weyx56 with SMTP id x56so3595891wey.13 for ; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 03:28:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=PHzHhqO/z0xyblr8GEZwOpZpHSd1McuZGM/Myo4pDq8=; b=nIcorypmHnigDAETd0Y5MDQt1ZJGWc2JeCCjAjhtSFd0Hx6qrkL6O2Y1JeJ85Rsg3Q Qla6dz4MM86dqt08/MXhRjhNXB6PS2yf3KwrW1g/ockkzkximXkx/iEVmCbfCSj4bToB VmoMfAtbkfUrBx06cSerExSKr0L208GOh1700dVbuyiYdVRjMiEG/8nNhQMQ/dgmJ5Dj ymYlaamS2f5FNlhCIJZpki1cef99JdwpeKJtc20VcEX4Ro0O1jSeMthrQCvkCTpkN+4e xCM8HOJX+CTN0zTccJKqhC8mc8tbLTijT0XXP30orx7JAQh7euXSceXt4JV55U5FBj5z xJwA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.86.106 with SMTP id o10mr22214449wiz.22.1346668131445; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 03:28:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.87.11 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 03:28:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.87.11 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 03:28:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201209011709.46974.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> References: <201209011709.46974.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 18:28:51 +0800 Message-ID: From: alphachi To: David Naylor X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkM/H97QZ+IdeHcBYikBEYMOe3F4RnRtFx8QBzuIutddmeQt+S5rfQOqhwwZZgC6HTbivQP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, "list: freebsd" Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.12 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 10:28:53 -0000 OK, I have solved the problem. 1.5.10 is fine for 9.0 RELEASE. 1.5.11&1.5.12 have the same error on it. After 9.0 RELEASE (9.0 STABLE, etc.), all version is fine. Thanks! =E5=9C=A8 2012-9-1 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=8811:10=EF=BC=8C"David Naylor" =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Hi, > > Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.5.12 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. > The > packages for FreeBSD 10 use the pkgng [3] format. > > There are many reports that wine does not work with a clang compiled worl= d > (help in fixing this problem is appreciated as it affects quite a few > users). > > The patch [4] for nVidia users is now included in the package and is run = on > installation (if the relevant files are accessible). Please read the > installation messages for further information. > > Regards, > > David > > [1] > MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.5.12,1.tbz) =3D > 335ef444a2f6f375dd22cf932b651919 > MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.5.12,1.txz) =3D > e06673c4ab9a0bb82a7d48dad5b8877f > MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd10/wine-fbsd64-1.5.12,1.txz) =3D > aafe06b15176f810c25cbf708c11aabb > [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 > [3] http://wiki.freebsd.org/pkgng > [4] The patch is located at /usr/local/share/wine/patch-nvidia.sh > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 11:34:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213A91065697 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 11:34:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from betts@norden1.com) Received: from jax.norden1.com (cblmdm72-240-117-108.buckeyecom.net [72.240.117.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DAB8FC0A for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 11:34:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jax.norden1.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2601BB929E for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 07:26:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jax.norden1.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (jax.norden1.com [127.0.0.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23613-03 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 07:26:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bart.norden1.com (router1 [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: betts@norden1.com) by jax.norden1.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC0BCB924A for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 07:26:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Darrell Betts Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 07:26:54 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1486\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1486) Subject: Error after upgrading to php 5.4.6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:34:18 -0000 My php pages will no longer render in a web browser after upgrading to = php 5.4.6. Used port upgrade to do this. Running apache 2.2.22_6. Checked the error log and this is what I receive=20 [notice] child pid 38232 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) This does this on all php pages. Any idea how to fix this error? Thanks= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 12:03:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F0C1065670 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:03:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B8A8FC27 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:03:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Footer: b3NlLm5s Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits)) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 13:53:16 +0200 Message-ID: <50449A0D.6030900@ose.nl> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 13:52:45 +0200 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Error after upgrading to php 5.4.6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 12:03:25 -0000 On 09/03/2012 01:26 PM, Darrell Betts wrote: > My php pages will no longer render in a web browser after upgrading to php 5.4.6. Used port upgrade to do this. Running apache 2.2.22_6. > Checked the error log and this is what I receive > > [notice] child pid 38232 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) > > This does this on all php pages. > Any idea how to fix this error? > > > Thanks_______________________________________________ > I had the same issue on a 8.3-STABLE machine. On other machines php is still at 5.4.3 and does not have this problems. On the machine where 5.4.6 gave the problems I completely removed php and installed lang/php53 (5.3.16) which solved the issue If you are using portmaster -b to update ports, then a backup of the previous port will be in /usr/ports/packages and you can reinstall the previous version Disclaimer: http://www.ose.nl/email From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 12:13:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A5C106566B for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from murthykvvsn@drreddys.com) Received: from mail2.drreddys.com (mail2.drreddys.com [202.3.66.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457E18FC16 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:13:27 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhoHAH2dRFDAqAHI/2dsb2JhbABFhT6kNwGPNIJ/gmEDI0GBIcJNiw2EB4McA4hOkwyNBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,359,1344191400"; d="scan'208";a="15889242" Received: from unknown (HELO drreddys.co.in) ([192.168.1.200]) by mail2.drreddys.com with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2012 17:42:14 +0530 From: murthykvvsn@drreddys.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 17:56:21 +0530 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on WEBSERV/DRG/IN(Release 8.5.2|August 10, 2010) at 09/03/2012 05:42:08 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: AUTO: KVVSN Murthy is out of the office. (returning 09/07/2012) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 12:13:30 -0000 I am out of the office until 09/07/2012. I am unavailable in TDC1 as i am going to CTOV for Roche audit preparation, please coordinate with Mr.KN Rao & Mr.K.Siva Prasad for PET related activities in my obsence. Note: This is an automated response to your message "freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 431, Issue 1" sent on 9/3/2012 5:30:53 PM. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away. Disclaimer This message contains legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or employee or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 13:02:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC77106566B for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 13:02:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@vereshagin.org) Received: from mx1.skyriver.ru (ns1.skyriver.ru [89.108.118.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32058FC12 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 13:02:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [109.163.238.48]) by mx1.skyriver.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D50635ABB for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:53:08 +0400 (MSK) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:52:13 +0400 From: Peter Vereshagin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120903125210.GA5387@external.screwed.box> References: <20120903030217.GA79339@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <86wr0binyc.fsf@srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org> <20120903072920.GB92658@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120903072920.GB92658@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Organization: ' X-Face: 8T>{1owI$Byj]]a; ^G]kRf*dkq>E-3':F>4ODP[#X4s"dr?^b&2G@'3lukno]A1wvJ_L(~u 6>I2ra/<,j1%@C[LN=>p#_}RIV+#:KTszp-X$bQOj,K Subject: Re: Sharing COM ports to Windows hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 13:02:20 -0000 Hello. 2012/09/03 14:29:20 +0700 Victor Sudakov => To freebsd-questions@freebsd.org : VS> > > There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be VS> > > accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone VS> > > have a success story for such a scenario? VS> At least it has an example of an RFC 2217 client (COM port to TCP VS> redirector) in its README file. Thanks again, will look at it. >From what I remember the os/2 smb protocol implementation could share COM ports as easily as LPT ports for printers. I can't remind though if this was for 'printer-only' purposes e. g. output-only, supplied with a mandatory queueing facilities, etc., or not. Who knows if modern smb protocol implementations could do this, too. Depending on a task I think the most interactive user-friendly solution here is a minicom(s) each in its own ssh'ed jail(s). -- Peter Vereshagin (http://vereshagin.org) pgp: A0E26627 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 13:24:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A111065670 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 13:24:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gg0-f182.google.com (mail-gg0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4495D8FC12 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 13:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnk4 with SMTP id k4so940563ggn.13 for ; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 06:24:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=l8ZJq0Ur/xHgyMT5HV2KCssD4gCldTUAOUUuiCxijuM=; b=JxKllo/SpHIMdVp1Gr0XuREHIj3qyqWrJGkAO3+kmB5/6MA3LFFaFzQ6WNZs+yD1ix x2GyTzO7FE52tesejafbOlZYOg8oHGXTm88quK44vu675LOc1bbmSmtff0LOfxfymQCh /iHOG6W4EhDWToAb5hMCXKThWIS0YiTa6HOlw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=l8ZJq0Ur/xHgyMT5HV2KCssD4gCldTUAOUUuiCxijuM=; b=lVPdxDHjar5gtkmmWjGA7gzB2p4EbI3r8OHWdh0WefiXXb7OtzheZyALUg3WqiFYaG Ht5DNdExlxmfLCZDQQMFYahP1FG5yKxmn/Q9fBJp5QxyJUUwx1J94ulG9Pdie7wrxRr4 3ljvtoUP1c9EWsadjjrVrEltp+xkPbagQH9X77xqWrQ0/iHzb3ZRXg4Sc1Pm2YJM0GpV SSn9sjQlA0HD81Hie+WI4rPO+6/ZyAcT29qEWWYgs7KYDSp8aRx0OyxGSs1qC3ronzLH u9R5f2Lc+QHDRIg2Z+64V4JbbRZznx7TxgUgI/SlBrBl2yuN79KihpAt209RquuERbe/ cbOg== Received: by 10.236.115.38 with SMTP id d26mr15269952yhh.40.1346678642631; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 06:24:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o25sm24227901yhm.14.2012.09.03.06.24.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 03 Sep 2012 06:24:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3X9X200Qk3z2CG4g for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 09:23:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 09:23:51 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120903092351.1e8a734f@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <50449A0D.6030900@ose.nl> References: <50449A0D.6030900@ose.nl> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkQupoTW7AFWn7n2Zh2qtiLuafqKNzAWch4yAcaELRCcQRl37wEsH3Ba2GkxNc5h9xcfqGc Subject: Re: Error after upgrading to php 5.4.6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 13:24:03 -0000 On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 13:52:45 +0200 Bas Smeelen articulated: > On 09/03/2012 01:26 PM, Darrell Betts wrote: > > My php pages will no longer render in a web browser after upgrading > > to php 5.4.6. Used port upgrade to do this. Running apache > > 2.2.22_6. Checked the error log and this is what I receive > > > > [notice] child pid 38232 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) > > > > This does this on all php pages. > > Any idea how to fix this error? > > > I had the same issue on a 8.3-STABLE machine. > On other machines php is still at 5.4.3 and does not have this > problems. > > On the machine where 5.4.6 gave the problems I completely removed php > and installed lang/php53 (5.3.16) which solved the issue > > If you are using portmaster -b to update ports, then a backup of the > previous port will be in /usr/ports/packages and you can reinstall > the previous version I completely removed all traces of PHP from my system, including configuration files, made sure to run "make config" in each PHP port I intended to install and then installed the latest version of PHP without a single problem. I believe, although I can not prove it, that the problem is not in the PHP port but rather in the update process. Running "portmanager" with the "-p" option might take care of some ports not being updated correctly with PHP also. Again, there is nothing wrong with the latest version but rather in the way it is presently running on your system. -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 13:43:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53621065670 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 13:43:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB148FC12 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 13:43:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Footer: b3NlLm5s Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits)) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 15:43:18 +0200 Message-ID: <5044B3D6.8000405@ose.nl> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 15:42:46 +0200 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <50449A0D.6030900@ose.nl> <20120903092351.1e8a734f@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120903092351.1e8a734f@scorpio> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Error after upgrading to php 5.4.6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 13:43:20 -0000 On 09/03/2012 03:23 PM, Jerry wrote: > On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 13:52:45 +0200 > Bas Smeelen articulated: > >> On 09/03/2012 01:26 PM, Darrell Betts wrote: >>> My php pages will no longer render in a web browser after upgrading >>> to php 5.4.6. Used port upgrade to do this. Running apache >>> 2.2.22_6. Checked the error log and this is what I receive >>> >>> [notice] child pid 38232 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) >>> >>> This does this on all php pages. >>> Any idea how to fix this error? >>> >> I had the same issue on a 8.3-STABLE machine. >> On other machines php is still at 5.4.3 and does not have this >> problems. >> >> On the machine where 5.4.6 gave the problems I completely removed php >> and installed lang/php53 (5.3.16) which solved the issue >> >> If you are using portmaster -b to update ports, then a backup of the >> previous port will be in /usr/ports/packages and you can reinstall >> the previous version > I completely removed all traces of PHP from my system, including > configuration files, made sure to run "make config" in each PHP port I > intended to install and then installed the latest version of PHP > without a single problem. I believe, although I can not prove it, that > the problem is not in the PHP port but rather in the update process. > Running "portmanager" with the "-p" option might take care of some > ports not being updated correctly with PHP also. Again, there is > nothing wrong with the latest version but rather in the way it is > presently running on your system. > OK thanks voor the insight, I only checked the extensions.ini file after updating I will go ahead and try it the clean way with version 5.4.6 Disclaimer: http://www.ose.nl/email From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 16:08:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 093B6106564A; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:08:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from levitch@iglou.com) Received: from rdsmtp.iglou.com (rdsmtp.iglou.com [192.107.41.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0748FC08; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:08:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iglou.com; s=alpha; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:cc:To:From:Date; bh=S9y7djFr5dPr1ZviRdA0Gqp6Bo0gn1ByaoMSvYmJu6s=; b=JO5+DtYl5ExWGQ3B9beveBiVGrnEhzK37ZvjFE3xqkatZWiNpg+JK4Rfu+TrJjRDEMt3l2eB014I9XgsaQAFByzQZHxYI56v8pfWbm5KxKeVnpBUS0YzdeAliozNCxaAzbNPTe/8G7D1muThlIPK3kaKjp41o+5+wT+PQZOzzt0=; Received: from iglou3.iglou.com ([192.107.41.6]:35316 helo=mail.iglou.com) by rdsmtp.iglou.com with esmtpa (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T8ZCM-0005Xe-Hg by authid with igloumta_auth; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 12:08:26 -0400 Received: from shell1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.17]:59513 helo=shell1) by mail.iglou.com with esmtps (TLS cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T8ZCM-0003r5-7S; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 12:08:26 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:08:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Darrel X-X-Sender: levitch@shell1 To: matthew@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (GSO 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: 192.107.41.17 X-IgLou-Customer: 3cb6f76205bd20f518810676a67a982b Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 16:08:33 -0000 Thanks, Matthew- and especially for mentioning to use -F on the first subsequent run of mergemaster. > > svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 src > For ports would it be better to match -fbsd91, like this: svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/9.1 ports or can the most recent ports be run with a release, like this: svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head ports Someone off of the list recommended something like this: svn co svn://svn.penx.com/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src svn co svn://svn.penx.com/ports/head /usr/ports Darrel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 16:29:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F19106566B for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:29:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819B98FC12 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:29:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.53]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AE3A710E6 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:29:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 21813 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2012 16:29:19 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 27309, pid: 26319, t: 0.1543s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:13495 Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 3 Sep 2012 16:29:19 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1322F33C23; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:29:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 1825C3983C; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:29:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Darrel References: Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 12:29:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Darrel's message of "Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:08:25 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: matthew@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 16:29:27 -0000 Darrel writes: > Thanks, Matthew- and especially for mentioning to use -F on the first > subsequent run of mergemaster. > >> >> svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 src >> > > For ports would it be better to match -fbsd91, like this: > svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/9.1 ports > > or can the most recent ports be run with a release, like this: > svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head ports > > Someone off of the list recommended something like this: > > svn co svn://svn.penx.com/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src > svn co svn://svn.penx.com/ports/head /usr/ports I would expect ports to still be best with head, as I haven't heard anything about branching it. I'm not sure whether there's any equivalent to tracking RELENG_9 (as opposed to tracking RELENG_9_1) under the branching scheme being used with subversion. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 16:35:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4892F1065670 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:35:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F7E8FC12 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.local (host86-143-181-80.range86-143.btcentralplus.com [86.143.181.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q83GZacV052687 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 3 Sep 2012 17:35:37 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q83GZacV052687 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q83GZacV052687; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host host86-143-181-80.range86-143.btcentralplus.com [86.143.181.80] claimed to be seedling.local Message-ID: <5044DC50.7020806@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 17:35:28 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lowell Gilbert References: <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig97AF3886D483F337F5686015" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Darrel , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 16:35:49 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig97AF3886D483F337F5686015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Darrel wrote: >> For ports would it be better to match -fbsd91, like this: >> svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/9.1 ports 404. There are no branches in the ports, in exactly the same way that there wasn't a RELENG_9 tag you could use in a ports supfile. Head is the only option with ports. On 03/09/2012 17:29, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > I'm not sure whether there's any equivalent to tracking RELENG_9 (as > opposed to tracking RELENG_9_1) under the branching scheme being used > with subversion. stable/9 is the SVN equivalent of RELENG_9 Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig97AF3886D483F337F5686015 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlBE3FgACgkQ8Mjk52CukIykCACdEiuXB9asKqJWB0SAl7Q1ZT/f WgUAn2+9c/Nmlw6QklpmcB+f1KXjo6n3 =FCSt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig97AF3886D483F337F5686015-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 16:46:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E671065673 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:46:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08138FC26 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:46:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.39]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31383A70475 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:46:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 23411 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2012 16:46:32 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 15715, pid: 17382, t: 0.1534s scanners: clamav: m: Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 3 Sep 2012 16:46:32 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC29233C24; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:46:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id A97073983C; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:46:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Matthew Seaman References: <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <5044DC50.7020806@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 12:46:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5044DC50.7020806@FreeBSD.org> (Matthew Seaman's message of "Mon, 03 Sep 2012 17:35:28 +0100") Message-ID: <44a9x712cd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Darrel , Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 16:46:34 -0000 Matthew Seaman writes: > On 03/09/2012 17:29, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> I'm not sure whether there's any equivalent to tracking RELENG_9 (as >> opposed to tracking RELENG_9_1) under the branching scheme being used >> with subversion. > > stable/9 is the SVN equivalent of RELENG_9 Ah, yes, that makes sense. I hadn't looked higher than the releng part of the path. Is anyone working on documenting this for the "cutting edge" section of the Handbook? I could take a shot at it myself, but I likely couldn't produce anything intelligible for beginners (at least, not before 9.1 is out). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 16:56:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B24E106566B for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:56:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Received: from outbound.ifdnrg.com (outbound.ifdnrg.com [193.200.98.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F063C8FC0A for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:56:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.109] (cpc12-sgyl31-2-0-cust160.18-2.cable.virginmedia.com [80.192.11.161]) (authenticated bits=0) by outbound.ifdnrg.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q83ElO1D028175 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 3 Sep 2012 15:47:25 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Message-ID: <5044C2FC.5050703@ifdnrg.com> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 15:47:24 +0100 From: Paul Macdonald User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Darrell Betts References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error after upgrading to php 5.4.6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 16:56:50 -0000 On 03/09/2012 12:26, Darrell Betts wrote: > My php pages will no longer render in a web browser after upgrading to php 5.4.6. Used port upgrade to do this. Running apache 2.2.22_6. > Checked the error log and this is what I receive > > [notice] child pid 38232 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) > > This does this on all php pages. > Any idea how to fix this error? > > > Thanks_______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > try editing your /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini, comment out all extensions (restart apache) and see if it stops seg faulting. If it works, add in the modules one by one until it stops. Previously i've seen people posting about the order being important Paul. -- ------------------------- Paul Macdonald IFDNRG Ltd Web and video hosting ------------------------- t: 0131 5548070 m: 07970339546 e: paul@ifdnrg.com w: http://www.ifdnrg.com ------------------------- IFDNRG 40 Maritime Street Edinburgh EH6 6SA ------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 17:09:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6911065673 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 17:09:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB298FC0C for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 17:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2012 13:09:48 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BYH26927; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 13:09:47 -0400 Received-SPF: None identity=pra; client-ip=209.6.86.84; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-sender="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Neutral identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.6.86.84; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-sender="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None identity=helo; client-ip=209.6.86.84; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-sender="postmaster@jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received: from 209-6-86-84.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.86.84]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2012 13:09:47 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20548.58455.998975.930226@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 13:09:43 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44a9x712cd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <5044DC50.7020806@FreeBSD.org> <44a9x712cd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 17:09:55 -0000 Lowell Gilbert writes: > Is anyone working on documenting this for the "cutting edge" > section of the Handbook? I could take a shot at it myself, but I > likely couldn't produce anything intelligible for beginners (at > least, not before 9.1 is out). That would be hugely appreciated; none of the current references (I'm aware of) carry the imprimitur of the Handbook. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 17:13:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED704106564A; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 17:13:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from levitch@iglou.com) Received: from rdsmtp.iglou.com (rdsmtp.iglou.com [192.107.41.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61318FC21; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 17:13:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iglou.com; s=alpha; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Subject:cc:To:From:Date; bh=ve+pwyARPJvX6FvX+H3xNfqoyGdjkzpfkDV3DfkC01s=; b=EdyapFg6Z03X2y7Kr3bJ8XCenhRqycIfvU+wIfEZDvtCsJLNbWKRQ9luFw+A8Vl7qY2sOH5VhS/uXbrvce+Q+vtQtMNnFv6c+z4lw6MIEBphizVcP5E4YqpcM5ry17KRMcDGno2ctCzeRza7nT03OfNjQiGqICfJYZvOsz04meQ=; Received: from iglou3.iglou.com ([192.107.41.6]:51858 helo=mail.iglou.com) by rdsmtp.iglou.com with esmtpa (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T8aDV-0002aH-P6 by authid with igloumta_auth; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 13:13:41 -0400 Received: from shell1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.17]:63974 helo=shell1) by mail.iglou.com with esmtps (TLS cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T8aDV-0004qe-Cw; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 13:13:41 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 13:13:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Darrel X-X-Sender: levitch@shell1 To: Lowell Gilbert In-Reply-To: <44a9x712cd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Message-ID: References: <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <5044DC50.7020806@FreeBSD.org> <44a9x712cd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (GSO 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Originating-IP: 192.107.41.17 X-IgLou-Customer: 3cb6f76205bd20f518810676a67a982b Cc: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 17:13:49 -0000 On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Matthew Seaman writes: > >> On 03/09/2012 17:29, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >>> I'm not sure whether there's any equivalent to tracking RELENG_9 (as >>> opposed to tracking RELENG_9_1) under the branching scheme being used >>> with subversion. >> >> stable/9 is the SVN equivalent of RELENG_9 > > Ah, yes, that makes sense. I hadn't looked higher than the releng part > of the path. > > Is anyone working on documenting this for the "cutting edge" section of > the Handbook? I could take a shot at it myself, but I likely couldn't > produce anything intelligible for beginners (at least, not before 9.1 is > out). > If you do decide to write a new section, I could possibly offer help on "dumbing it down". :) At least with the English version. Darrel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 18:00:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B91B2106564A; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 18:00:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from levitch@iglou.com) Received: from rdsmtp.iglou.com (rdsmtp.iglou.com [192.107.41.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7382E8FC2B; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 18:00:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iglou.com; s=alpha; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Subject:cc:To:From:Date; bh=tdRbkC1HAcrFO9RmrlWI1+2xRQ2c983ebRKlw3jCMDw=; b=u+hGNu7yYdfTBFQ/5ULvyzodluVu6llPYba6mDlubdhEJ0MBJmLrLo4UP1E4m0idNL2nfN6mzhUSX7KGqeLOG4ek5KNTXOJDbSl1EmdXCd2gyC/1UVNy74yuqaX2UQUVEyCWdEpp3een+Qm8T1JpVRgCc+JFau+YxaZIU4/K9g8=; Received: from iglou4.iglou.com ([192.107.41.39]:42790 helo=mail.iglou.com) by rdsmtp.iglou.com with esmtpa (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T8ax6-0002c9-2P by authid with igloumta_auth; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 14:00:48 -0400 Received: from shell1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.17]:64221 helo=shell1) by mail.iglou.com with esmtps (TLS cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T8ax5-0003uz-M8; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 14:00:47 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 14:00:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Darrel X-X-Sender: levitch@shell1 To: Matthew Seaman In-Reply-To: <5044DC50.7020806@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <5044DC50.7020806@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (GSO 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Originating-IP: 192.107.41.17 X-IgLou-Customer: 3cb6f76205bd20f518810676a67a982b Cc: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:00:48 -0000 >>> For ports would it be better to match -fbsd91, like this: >>> svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/9.1 ports > > > On 03/09/2012 17:29, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> I'm not sure whether there's any equivalent to tracking RELENG_9 (as >> opposed to tracking RELENG_9_1) under the branching scheme being used >> with subversion. > > stable/9 is the SVN equivalent of RELENG_9 > > Could I then run: svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/[ 91 9.1] /usr/ports/ or | and svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/stable/9 /usr/ports/ ? Since in the past several years I installed minimal fbsd and then used portsnap for ports, so I was not aware that -head was the only option for ports- is that what Lowell was pointing out? It turns out that mergemaster would have been alright in my case, due to .mergemasterrc, I can not recall why this was selected, comments are welcomed: # cat .mergemasterrc FREEBSD_ID=YES VERBOSE=YES AUTO_INSTALL=YES RUN_UPDATES=YES COMP_CONFS=YES PRESERVE_FILES_DIR=/var/tmp/mergemaster/preserved-files-`date +%y%m%d-%H%M%S` DELETE_STALE_RC_FILES=YES Kind regards, Darrel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 18:32:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A5110656D7 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 18:32:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vs@celicom.ru) Received: from backup.newdesign.ru (backup.newdesign.ru [89.111.189.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A3F8FC12 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 18:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [46.242.121.227] (helo=[192.168.1.101]) by backup.newdesign.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.75 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1T8aIg-000Ie2-OQ; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:19:02 +0400 Message-ID: <5044E6A3.2010703@celicom.ru> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:19:31 +0400 From: Solmin Vladimir User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Darrell Betts References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error after upgrading to php 5.4.6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:32:39 -0000 Hi! After any upgrade of php i'm use one script that was founded on freebsd.org $ cd /usr/local/etc/php $ cat fixphpextorder.sh #!/bin/sh # ============================================================= # Fix php/extensions.ini order # # Script based on the idea and information(s) of # - http://www.pingle.org/2007/09/22/php-crashes-extensions-workaround # - http://nerdstock.org/php_extensions # # Please copy your original php/extensions.ini to a save place before # running this script! # # There is no guaranty the script is working for you or don't damage # your system. Use at own Risk! # # 2011-04-03 olli hauer # # License: BSD # http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html # # # Updates: # 2011-12-26: # Make sed expression more explicit. # Reported by Kartsten Schmidt # INI=/usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini EXT="session.so fileinfo.so crack.so ssh2.so imagick.so ldap.so simplexml.so dba.so ctype.so apc.so ftp.so mbstring.so tokenizer.so filter.so pgsql.so gmp.so mcrypt.so tidy.so xmlwriter.so mhash.so gd.so ncurses.so readline.so gettext.so iconv.so dbase.so calendar.so exif.so zlib.so curl.so mailparse.so xmlrpc.so bz2.so sysvmsg.so pdf.so openssl.so ming.so dom.so hash.so xmlreader.so gnupg.so bcmath.so pcre.so xsl.so wddx.so memcache.so soap.so spl.so sqlite.so recode.so pdo.so pdo_mysql.so pdo_sqlite.so mysqli.so mysql.so imap.so sockets.so pspell.so xml.so" if [ ! -e ${INI} ] ; then echo "cannot find ${INI}" exit 1 fi # cleanup previous run [ -e ${INI}.new ] && rm -f ${INI}.new cp -f ${INI} ${INI}.work for e in ${EXT}; do if egrep -q "^extension=${e}" ${INI}.work ; then echo extension=${e} >> ${INI}.new sed -i '' -e "/^extension=${e}/d" ${INI}.work fi done if [ -s ${INI}.work ]; then echo "; additional extension(s) not known by $(basename $0)" >> ${INI}.new # sybase_ct needs to be loaded last. grep ^extension ${INI}.work | grep -v sybase_ct.so >> ${INI}.new grep ^extension=sybase_ct.so ${INI}.work >> ${INI}.new AE=1 fi [ -e ${INI}.work ] && rm -f ${INI}.work if cmp -s ${INI} ${INI}.new ; then echo "No changes found, remove ${INI}.new" rm -f ${INI}.new AE=0 fi if [ ${AE} -ne 0 ]; then cat << _EOF ============================== New INI is saved as ${INI}.new Additional extension(s) not known by $(basename $0) are added to the end of new INI file. Please review the new INI, and replace it on your own! Do some Basic tests: php -V php -m php -i apachectl graceful ... _EOF fi cat << _EOF If the segfault issue is not gone, or you cannot find the issue - ask on the ports@ mailing list or - open a PR: Synopsys: lang/php5 Segmentation fault. Additional try debugging with command: gdb php ./php.core http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/debugging.html _EOF Best regards, Vladimir Unix Sysadmin 03.09.2012 15:26, Darrell Betts пишет: > My php pages will no longer render in a web browser after upgrading to php 5.4.6. Used port upgrade to do this. Running apache 2.2.22_6. > Checked the error log and this is what I receive > > [notice] child pid 38232 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) > > This does this on all php pages. > Any idea how to fix this error? > > > Thanks_______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 18:58:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCB91065670 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 18:58:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78068FC0A for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 18:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.local ([31.123.1.252]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q83IwAkR055146 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 3 Sep 2012 19:58:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q83IwAkR055146 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q83IwAkR055146; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host [31.123.1.252] claimed to be seedling.local Message-ID: <5044FDC2.5060809@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 19:58:10 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Darrel References: <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <5044DC50.7020806@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE31378D673032D89D684A2E7" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_PBL, RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:58:29 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE31378D673032D89D684A2E7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/09/2012 19:00, Darrel wrote: > Could I then run: >=20 > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/[ 91 9.1] /usr/ports/ > > or | and >=20 > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/stable/9 /usr/ports/ ? >=20 Why don't you try it and see? All you'll get is an error message essentially saying 'file not found.' Simply put, there isn't a path ports/releng/9.1 or ports/stable/9 in the FreeBSD SVN repository. Look here if you don't believe me: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ Click on 'ports' and look at the subdirectories under there. The *only* bit of the SVN repository that follows the branching structure you seem so enamoured of is base -- the system sources. Get that clear in your head, and you will have a much better time of it. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enigE31378D673032D89D684A2E7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlBE/cIACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwREgCbBeU+lXSkI34qjrG6a4dj6cy0 31IAn39t1uJkz2ush0B6HOxWZ2351x5y =MmA6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE31378D673032D89D684A2E7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 19:11:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B6E1065673 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 19:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ws@au.dyndns.ws) Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:6:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F269F8FC1A for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 19:11:33 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAHj/RFCWZWdv/2dsb2JhbABFvCuDcG6IH5kgoRmSMAOITo4fhEuKO4Jz Received: from ppp103-111.static.internode.on.net (HELO lillith-iv.ovirt.dyndns.ws) ([150.101.103.111]) by ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 04 Sep 2012 04:41:32 +0930 X-Envelope-From: ws@au.dyndns.ws X-Envelope-To: Received: from [172.17.17.134] (ws@predator-ii.buffyverse [172.17.17.134]) by lillith-iv.ovirt.dyndns.ws (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q83JBIoE036931 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 04:41:18 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from ws@au.dyndns.ws) From: Wayne Sierke To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ASCII" Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 04:41:21 +0930 Message-ID: <1346699481.13805.42.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (lillith-iv.ovirt.dyndns.ws [172.17.17.142]); Tue, 04 Sep 2012 04:41:18 +0930 (CST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 172.17.17.142 X-Scanned-By: SpamAssassin 3.003002(2011-06-06) X-Scanned-By: ClamAV X-Spam-Score: -2.9 () ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 Subject: Combining netcat with fifos results in stuck queues/sbwait X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 19:11:34 -0000 I was hoping to establish a simple processing server using nc(1). After finding numerous examples of combining netcat with fifos (named pipes) I am unable to establish a reliable setup. E.g. following the example of the canonical netcat server: server: #mkfifo backpipe #nc -l 4242 < backpipe | tr -u "[:lower:]" "[:upper:]" > backpipe client: #mkfifo frontpipe #nc localhost 4242 < frontpipe > testfile.out & #cat testfile.in > frontpipe For any non-trivially small testfile I inevitably end up with the processes at both ends stuck in sbwait. I have managed to avoid the stuck condition by setting the TCP buffer sizes at both ends: nc -I 2048 -O 1024 with a resulting throughput of ~40kB/s (and a supplementary problem of truncation). There are other oddities, such as not using the fifo on the client end: #nc -I 2048 -O 1024 localhost 4242 < testfile.in > testfile.out & also results in "stuck" processes. So far I've tried on 8.2/8.3 i386 and amd64. The full implementation is planned to use fifos for input and output along with fd redirection but attempts using that have fared no better. Can anyone provide a secret-sauce recipe for netcat/fifo success? Thanks, Wayne From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 19:39:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015B4106564A for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 19:39:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEACF8FC12 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 19:39:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.48]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B37A701F0 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 15:39:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 28425 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2012 19:39:46 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 25120, pid: 19224, t: 0.1869s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 3 Sep 2012 19:39:46 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DE333C23; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 15:39:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 4E76C3983C; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 15:39:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Darrel References: <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <5044DC50.7020806@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 15:39:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Darrel's message of "Mon, 3 Sep 2012 14:00:47 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: <44k3wazyis.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Lowell Gilbert , Matthew Seaman , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 19:39:54 -0000 Darrel writes: >>>> For ports would it be better to match -fbsd91, like this: >>>> svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/9.1 ports >> >> >> On 03/09/2012 17:29, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >>> I'm not sure whether there's any equivalent to tracking RELENG_9 (as >>> opposed to tracking RELENG_9_1) under the branching scheme being used >>> with subversion. >> >> stable/9 is the SVN equivalent of RELENG_9 >> >> > > Could I then run: > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/[ 91 9.1] /usr/ports/ > > or | and > > svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/stable/9 /usr/ports/ ? No. > Since in the past several years I installed minimal fbsd and then used > portsnap for ports, so I was not aware that -head was the only option > for ports- is that what Lowell was pointing out? Yes. There is never any branching in the ports tree. The latest (i.e., head) version is, at any given time, expected to work for all (then) supported versions of the base system. This is not a change -- this has always been the case, and the current (cvsup-centric) text in the Handbook describes it explicitly. > It turns out that mergemaster would have been alright in my case, due > to .mergemasterrc, I can not recall why this was selected, comments > are welcomed: > > # cat .mergemasterrc > FREEBSD_ID=YES Equivalent to -F. > VERBOSE=YES > AUTO_INSTALL=YES > RUN_UPDATES=YES > COMP_CONFS=YES > PRESERVE_FILES_DIR=/var/tmp/mergemaster/preserved-files-`date +%y%m%d-%H%M%S` > DELETE_STALE_RC_FILES=YES A reasonable set of defaults, although I prefer a little more human interaction on major changes. Why it "would have been alright(sic)" in your case isn't clear, because you don't describe the alternative, but the manual for mergemaster(8) almost certainly has the answer. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 19:46:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DC1106564A; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 19:46:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from levitch@iglou.com) Received: from rdsmtp.iglou.com (rdsmtp.iglou.com [192.107.41.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A80C8FC14; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 19:46:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iglou.com; s=alpha; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Subject:cc:To:From:Date; bh=slbaftln56zcwGksDx+grK1lnuZOzj/hEqBQX9OJL8s=; b=OEEqYjdg1nr4mz4fHvaJZsQ5ailOVGiO6k+vfWCP2xpwdJHtSfpQkDVfSXJKgZYXbO3XKC4d0yEOobZ8J7QR1pi8H03QxyOBP4A9u/Zk8MfPu2x8G3TS2DB3OitrbAZuLo6uNhMht4mF8w+t3KQU+sdue76p/L/vgfRTOwKJMVk=; Received: from iglou2.iglou.com ([192.107.41.8]:37958 helo=mail.iglou.com) by rdsmtp.iglou.com with esmtpa (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T8cb9-0004jM-DE by authid with igloumta_auth; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 15:46:15 -0400 Received: from shell1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.17]:64808 helo=shell1) by mail.iglou.com with esmtps (TLS cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T8cb9-0004vb-1t; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 15:46:15 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 15:46:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Darrel X-X-Sender: levitch@shell1 To: Matthew Seaman In-Reply-To: <5044FDC2.5060809@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <5044DC50.7020806@FreeBSD.org> <5044FDC2.5060809@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (GSO 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Originating-IP: 192.107.41.17 X-IgLou-Customer: 3cb6f76205bd20f518810676a67a982b Cc: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 19:46:16 -0000 On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 03/09/2012 19:00, Darrel wrote: >> Could I then run: >> >> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/releng/[ 91 9.1] /usr/ports/ >> >> or | and >> >> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/stable/9 /usr/ports/ ? >> > > Why don't you try it and see? All you'll get is an error message > essentially saying 'file not found.' > After reading so many of your intelligent posts, then I typically default to believing in your methods. To get svn:// to work then the fileserver, i.e., -fbsd9 and at the moment becoming -fbsd91 required service svn added outbound in pf.conf. The gateway is -obsd51 and needed the port number out in pf.conf, since svn is not included in /etc/services. :) > Simply put, there isn't a path ports/releng/9.1 or ports/stable/9 in > the FreeBSD SVN repository. Look here if you don't believe me: > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ > > Click on 'ports' and look at the subdirectories under there. > > The *only* bit of the SVN repository that follows the branching > structure you seem so enamoured of is base -- the system sources. > Get that clear in your head, and you will have a much better time of it. The releases seem neat to me because fbsd reports to have security officers tracking the specified version. I am not necessarily enamoured with it. I have followed -stable and -current before. I can use portsnap as before, or experiment. I might try: svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports /usr/ports I probably know everything for my purposes at this point. As the fileserver is building, some of the points seem obvious now. Thanks to you and Lowell. Darrel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 20:11:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9464106566C; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 20:11:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from levitch@iglou.com) Received: from rdsmtp.iglou.com (rdsmtp.iglou.com [192.107.41.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814E28FC1F; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 20:11:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iglou.com; s=alpha; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Subject:cc:To:From:Date; bh=8tVLCXBxlVPjl68tyN7ycyEPoL1B98YoP3TevKVd64M=; b=hw47ydt0GzkyEAfwqoo7f8/O9vNBalGgsYHO8lwVUNoyXLynqsTN3Lm9KLlz4ZLvPfE45rRhcQ/0TqNzr/nkL5fheKBShzaTUfY0eIO6GSwg0E5VtyX8s/MTUECw+uRy2/AFu/hK33h9duuo+Wn67mLopmuroBcec43KiiHOrgE=; Received: from iglou2.iglou.com ([192.107.41.8]:44701 helo=mail.iglou.com) by rdsmtp.iglou.com with esmtpa (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T8czv-0001In-0M by authid with igloumta_auth; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 16:11:51 -0400 Received: from shell1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.17]:64955 helo=shell1) by mail.iglou.com with esmtps (TLS cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T8czu-0000F2-OE; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 16:11:50 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:11:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Darrel X-X-Sender: levitch@shell1 To: Lowell Gilbert In-Reply-To: <44k3wazyis.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Message-ID: References: <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <5044DC50.7020806@FreeBSD.org> <44k3wazyis.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (GSO 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Originating-IP: 192.107.41.17 X-IgLou-Customer: 3cb6f76205bd20f518810676a67a982b Cc: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 20:11:51 -0000 >>> >>> stable/9 is the SVN equivalent of RELENG_9 src only, understood now. Thanks, Matthew. > Yes. There is never any branching in the ports tree. The latest (i.e., > head) version is, at any given time, expected to work for all (then) > supported versions of the base system. > > This is not a change -- this has always been the case, and the current > (cvsup-centric) text in the Handbook describes it explicitly. > same as nbsd, then. I probably need to read fbsd handbook again >> It turns out that mergemaster would have been alright in my case, due >> to .mergemasterrc, I can not recall why this was selected, comments >> are welcomed: >> >> # cat .mergemasterrc >> FREEBSD_ID=YES > > Equivalent to -F. > >> VERBOSE=YES >> AUTO_INSTALL=YES >> RUN_UPDATES=YES >> COMP_CONFS=YES >> PRESERVE_FILES_DIR=/var/tmp/mergemaster/preserved-files-`date +%y%m%d-%H%M%S` >> DELETE_STALE_RC_FILES=YES > > A reasonable set of defaults, although I prefer a little more human > interaction on major changes. Why it "would have been alright(sic)" in > your case isn't clear, because you don't describe the alternative, but > the manual for mergemaster(8) almost certainly has the answer. > Hopefully not to have bored you too much, Matthew's mention of -F with mergemaster solved this problem of conversion from csup to svn- yet as you saw it was already in my .mergemasterrc , that is why I wrote that it "would have been alright". I like human interaction in every case where it is beneficial. If you want to send some guidance, it is welcomed. Other than that, I will let it be and also study the manual again; i.e. man 8 mergemaster. Kind regards, Darrel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 20:34:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55004106564A for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 20:34:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F3DC8FC0A for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 20:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.42]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965CFA710AC for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:34:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 20890 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2012 20:34:23 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 19040, pid: 14805, t: 0.1660s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 3 Sep 2012 20:34:22 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C5733C23; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:34:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 15DE93983C; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:34:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Darrel , Robert Huff References: <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <5044DC50.7020806@FreeBSD.org> <44a9x712cd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 16:34:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Darrel's message of "Mon, 3 Sep 2012 13:13:41 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: <44ehmiyhfa.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 20:34:25 -0000 Darrel writes: > On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >> Matthew Seaman writes: >> >>> On 03/09/2012 17:29, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >>>> I'm not sure whether there's any equivalent to tracking RELENG_9 (as >>>> opposed to tracking RELENG_9_1) under the branching scheme being used >>>> with subversion. >>> >>> stable/9 is the SVN equivalent of RELENG_9 >> >> Ah, yes, that makes sense. I hadn't looked higher than the releng part >> of the path. >> >> Is anyone working on documenting this for the "cutting edge" section of >> the Handbook? I could take a shot at it myself, but I likely couldn't >> produce anything intelligible for beginners (at least, not before 9.1 is >> out). >> > > If you do decide to write a new section, I could possibly offer help > on "dumbing it down". :) At least with the English version. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=171292 I don't think "dumbing it down" is an issue. What I may have left out that beginners wouldn't think of... more of a concern. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 20:56:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD69106566C for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 20:56:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from levitch@iglou.com) Received: from rdsmtp.iglou.com (rdsmtp.iglou.com [192.107.41.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639178FC17 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 20:56:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iglou.com; s=alpha; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Subject:cc:To:From:Date; bh=TiVwOQn0cr+vzMuqtZwEwHTvWfkYU67bC1jUEyTyHFs=; b=hDJwgLBU7lvMc9x+ryGam3Z1i/3grz24qDPxoPe1COTyEQQyJJO9UQzgOW+N0VTaTM/FOt5Hn70onHKD/DKMpOl3ircbvReSFNhViSZHKT91sNRwH+RrRlCysVWAcTzcWMcI5TPDJrF0cZDnmcfa5IQAhZj74/stos0Q1K9Dg9g=; Received: from iglou3.iglou.com ([192.107.41.6]:35303 helo=mail.iglou.com) by rdsmtp.iglou.com with esmtpa (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T8dgh-0000Je-A4 by authid with igloumta_auth for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 16:56:03 -0400 Received: from shell1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.17]:65186 helo=shell1) by mail.iglou.com with esmtps (TLS cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T8dgg-0004TK-Tq; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 16:56:03 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:56:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Darrel X-X-Sender: levitch@shell1 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <44ehmiyhfa.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Message-ID: References: <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <5044DC50.7020806@FreeBSD.org> <44a9x712cd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <44ehmiyhfa.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (GSO 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Originating-IP: 192.107.41.17 X-IgLou-Customer: 3cb6f76205bd20f518810676a67a982b Cc: Robert Huff Subject: Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 20:56:04 -0000 >>> Is anyone working on documenting this for the "cutting edge" section of >>> the Handbook? I could take a shot at it myself, but I likely couldn't >>> produce anything intelligible for beginners (at least, not before 9.1 is >>> out). >>> >> >> If you do decide to write a new section, I could possibly offer help >> on "dumbing it down". :) At least with the English version. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=171292 > > I don't think "dumbing it down" is an issue. What I may have left out > that beginners wouldn't think of... more of a concern. > I apologize- that comment was intended to be taken with a grain of salt. As I am asking just now changing from csup to svn, it seems like I might have the insight of a beginner in this instance. - considering my file server: It appears that buildkernel is going well. Next, I will decide whether to keep /usr/ports with portsnap or move ports to svn as well. Peace be to you, Darrel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 21:35:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3291065698 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 21:35:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4CD8FC1D for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 21:35:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.37]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2012 17:35:15 -0400 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BQZ12751; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 17:35:10 -0400 Received: from 209-6-86-84.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.86.84]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2012 17:35:10 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20549.8846.105735.468146@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 17:35:10 -0400 To: Darrel In-Reply-To: References: <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <5044DC50.7020806@FreeBSD.org> <44a9x712cd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <44ehmiyhfa.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Robert Huff , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:35:19 -0000 Darrel writes: > Next, I will decide whether to keep /usr/ports with portsnap or > move ports to svn as well. I just did this (ports and docs) and - modulo an error on my part - it has been remarkably painless. (Make sure you eradicate all vesitges of c(v)sup activity.) Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 22:13:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC5C1065670 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 22:13:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99068FC12 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 22:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id q83MDfQq082729 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 3 Sep 2012 15:13:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.14.2/Submit) with UUCP id q83MDfrL082728; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 15:13:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA06031; Mon, 3 Sep 12 15:01:33 PDT Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 22:01:26 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: vas@mpeks.tomsk.su Message-Id: <50458b26.tmHtgZn7IH/7r2In%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20120903030217.GA79339@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <50443766.4020705@boosten.org> <5044b978.qFhU35CVsU8J/nET%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20120903072449.GA92658@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> In-Reply-To: <20120903072449.GA92658@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sharing COM ports to Windows hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 22:13:43 -0000 Victor Sudakov wrote: > In fact, the question is whether there is a standards compliant > (not written for some proprietary hardware terminal server > protocol) driver for Windows. Not exactly a FreeBSD question, > I know :) Finding a Windows driver that will work with an existing FreeBSD program is certainly one possible approach. Another, which I understood to be the intent of the original inquiry, is finding a FreeBSD solution that will work with an existing Windows driver. There's surely no reason why a FreeBSD system _can't_ support a protocol originally developed by a hardware terminal server manufacturer, as vpnc does for the Cisco VPN protocol. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 02:18:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039101065674 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 02:18:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DD38FC0A for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 02:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T8iiR-0005rT-5S for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 04:18:11 +0200 Received: from pool-173-79-96-198.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.96.198]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 04:18:11 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-96-198.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 04:18:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 22:18:13 -0400 Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <5044C2FC.5050703@ifdnrg.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-96-198.washdc.fios.verizon.net Subject: Re: Error after upgrading to php 5.4.6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 02:18:16 -0000 Paul Macdonald wrote: > On 03/09/2012 12:26, Darrell Betts wrote: >> My php pages will no longer render in a web browser after upgrading to >> php 5.4.6. Used port upgrade to do this. Running apache 2.2.22_6. Checked >> the error log and this is what I receive >> >> [notice] child pid 38232 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) >> >> This does this on all php pages. >> Any idea how to fix this error? [snip] > try editing your /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini, comment out all > extensions (restart apache) and see if it stops seg faulting. > If it works, add in the modules one by one until it stops. > > Previously i've seen people posting about the order being important > Some while back I thought portupgrading PHP caused the extensions.ini to be edited after each and every extension rebuild/reinstall, causing a shuffle like effect. Since I do a backup before, including all configs, I got into the habit of just copying my old extensions.ini back into place afterwards prior to restarting PHP and/or web servers. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 03:53:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC31106564A for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 03:53:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from levitch@iglou.com) Received: from rdsmtp.iglou.com (rdsmtp.iglou.com [192.107.41.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677C58FC0A for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 03:53:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iglou.com; s=alpha; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Subject:cc:To:From:Date; bh=z4j9etLe+P1Kxzoyedr8T7lh4iVfvzu4kThiTw/Ht6s=; b=q3cUwKq4b8OtFdQF4slrVHpIrxel28SMTS53OQObEQtn3Dv7toQyprfP4ZeIyvl1v+Po8z9VtqIsfvmoGSQAw4uBkqhLxIOZ5d9QlhvcoAkuXaLSrpMOn2hK/YQ+ZFM51tnYWW4tZk5nsBh35eaZ73mRZ/5rckVR2NutjIg4N5E=; Received: from iglou1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.3]:36921 helo=mail.iglou.com) by rdsmtp.iglou.com with esmtpa (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T8kCJ-0003F4-42 by authid with igloumta_auth for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 23:53:07 -0400 Received: from shell1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.17]:35071 helo=shell1) by mail.iglou.com with esmtps (TLS cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T8kCI-00048q-Lb; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 23:53:06 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 23:53:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Darrel X-X-Sender: levitch@shell1 To: Robert Huff In-Reply-To: <20549.8846.105735.468146@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Message-ID: References: <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <5044DC50.7020806@FreeBSD.org> <44a9x712cd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <44ehmiyhfa.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20549.8846.105735.468146@jerusalem.litteratus.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (GSO 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Originating-IP: 192.107.41.17 X-IgLou-Customer: 3cb6f76205bd20f518810676a67a982b Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 03:53:14 -0000 >> Next, I will decide whether to keep /usr/ports with portsnap or >> move ports to svn as well. > > I just did this (ports and docs) and - modulo an error on my > part - it has been remarkably painless. (Make sure you eradicate > all vesitges of c(v)sup activity. Hello Robert, Other than my csup-file, I found these: /home/var.db/sup/src-all/checkouts.cvs:RELENG_9 /home/var.db/sup/src-all/checkouts.cvs:RELENG_9_0 /.snap /home/.snap /home/var.db/portsnap /home/var.db/portsnap/* /tmp/.snap /usr/.snap /var/.snap Also, on my amd64 kernel I had to remove 'device atapicam'. The failed kernel build might be a bug, perhaps I should file a report. Thank you, Darrel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 05:55:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0DD106564A for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 05:55:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from levitch@iglou.com) Received: from rdsmtp.iglou.com (rdsmtp.iglou.com [192.107.41.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0040C8FC14 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 05:55:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iglou.com; s=alpha; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Subject:cc:To:From:Date; bh=UXpQw3BDCZEUIYAKlejswKD8gBvt7zm0kbcZ4sRXByM=; b=DCovuboSx4U56sbAGb4r7WEQBtF5AFVO0TOELJI5ZpH5jPtwdD0rREKWl9zOFKNNlXOg+LAF2C5B2xmvjC6h2U8bUIITGrtfJAZ0jKt8pkFeM9AW/Z0h2btJTrCQ/zS5uxsVdfb16BjT82AnhxrKQykELxNBwAiFgcB5VBKTZnI=; Received: from iglou4.iglou.com ([192.107.41.39]:58939 helo=mail.iglou.com) by rdsmtp.iglou.com with esmtpa (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T8m6k-0002wE-8o by authid with igloumta_auth for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 01:55:30 -0400 Received: from shell1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.17]:35733 helo=shell1) by mail.iglou.com with esmtps (TLS cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T8m6j-000463-Qc; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 01:55:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 01:55:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Darrel X-X-Sender: levitch@shell1 To: Robert Huff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <5044DC50.7020806@FreeBSD.org> <44a9x712cd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <44ehmiyhfa.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20549.8846.105735.468146@jerusalem.litteratus.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (GSO 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Originating-IP: 192.107.41.17 X-IgLou-Customer: 3cb6f76205bd20f518810676a67a982b Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 05:55:31 -0000 On Mon, 3 Sep 2012, Darrel wrote: > >>> Next, I will decide whether to keep /usr/ports with portsnap or >>> move ports to svn as well. >> >> I just did this (ports and docs) and - modulo an error on my >> part - it has been remarkably painless. (Make sure you eradicate >> all vesitges of c(v)sup activity. > > Hello Robert, > > Other than my csup-file, I found these: > > /home/var.db/sup/src-all/checkouts.cvs:RELENG_9 > /home/var.db/sup/src-all/checkouts.cvs:RELENG_9_0 > /.snap > /home/.snap > /home/var.db/portsnap > /home/var.db/portsnap/* > /tmp/.snap > /usr/.snap > /var/.snap > > Also, on my amd64 kernel I had to remove 'device atapicam'. > > The failed kernel build might be a bug, perhaps I should file a report. > > Thank you, > Darrel > I found these files as well: /var/db/portsnap/ /var/db/sup/ Darrel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 06:15:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F8A1065670 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 06:15:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBC18FC0C for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 06:15:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Footer: b3NlLm5s Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits)) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 08:15:25 +0200 Message-ID: <50459C5D.4010004@ose.nl> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 08:14:53 +0200 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5044C2FC.5050703@ifdnrg.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Error after upgrading to php 5.4.6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 06:15:28 -0000 On 09/04/2012 04:18 AM, Michael Powell wrote: > Paul Macdonald wrote: > >> On 03/09/2012 12:26, Darrell Betts wrote: >>> My php pages will no longer render in a web browser after upgrading to >>> php 5.4.6. Used port upgrade to do this. Running apache 2.2.22_6. Checked >>> the error log and this is what I receive >>> >>> [notice] child pid 38232 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) >>> >>> This does this on all php pages. >>> Any idea how to fix this error? > [snip] >> try editing your /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini, comment out all >> extensions (restart apache) and see if it stops seg faulting. >> If it works, add in the modules one by one until it stops. >> >> Previously i've seen people posting about the order being important >> > Some while back I thought portupgrading PHP caused the extensions.ini to be > edited after each and every extension rebuild/reinstall, causing a shuffle > like effect. Since I do a backup before, including all configs, I got into > the habit of just copying my old extensions.ini back into place afterwards > prior to restarting PHP and/or web servers. > > -Mike > Well with pkg_delete -f php5\* , removing all of php's config files in /usr/local/etc (keeping a backup of course) and then installing php-5.4.6 extensions resolved the problem. It does not happen too often that this goes wrong, but somehow php can be troublesome at times. Thanks Bas Disclaimer: http://www.ose.nl/email From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 06:26:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5196106566C for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 06:26:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690918FC14 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 06:25:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Footer: b3NlLm5s Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits)) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 08:25:57 +0200 Message-ID: <50459ED4.3020804@ose.nl> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 08:25:24 +0200 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5044C2FC.5050703@ifdnrg.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Error after upgrading to php 5.4.6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 06:26:00 -0000 On 09/04/2012 04:18 AM, Michael Powell wrote: > Paul Macdonald wrote: > >> On 03/09/2012 12:26, Darrell Betts wrote: >>> My php pages will no longer render in a web browser after upgrading to >>> php 5.4.6. Used port upgrade to do this. Running apache 2.2.22_6. Checked >>> the error log and this is what I receive >>> >>> [notice] child pid 38232 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) >>> >>> This does this on all php pages. >>> Any idea how to fix this error? > [snip] >> try editing your /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini, comment out all >> extensions (restart apache) and see if it stops seg faulting. >> If it works, add in the modules one by one until it stops. >> >> Previously i've seen people posting about the order being important >> > Some while back I thought portupgrading PHP caused the extensions.ini to be > edited after each and every extension rebuild/reinstall, causing a shuffle > like effect. Since I do a backup before, including all configs, I got into > the habit of just copying my old extensions.ini back into place afterwards > prior to restarting PHP and/or web servers. > > -Mike > My previous response was sent too early :( I still get errors in apache [Tue Sep 04 08:14:42 2012] [error] [client 192.168.1.189] PHP Warning: Unknown: Unable to allocate memory for pool. in Unknown on line 0, referer: http://sys.ose.nl/cacti/graph_view.php?action=tree&tree_id=1&leaf_id=21 [Tue Sep 04 08:14:43 2012] [notice] child pid 56172 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) [Tue Sep 04 08:14:43 2012] [notice] child pid 56163 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) [Tue Sep 04 08:14:53 2012] [error] [client 192.168.1.189] PHP Warning: Unknown: Unable to allocate memory for pool. in Unknown on line 0, referer: http://sys.ose.nl/cacti/graph_view.php?action=tree&tree_id=1&leaf_id=7 [Tue Sep 04 08:15:59 2012] [notice] child pid 56169 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) So now I will comment out all extensions and start investigating. Well it turns out to be apc.so, this comes with core php I guess? For completeness: The php manual states this is for alternative php cache. http://php.net/manual/en/book.apc.php With apc.so commented out and testing with cacti and mediawiki all seems to go well. My extensions.ini follows below extension=pdf.so extension=imagick.so ;extension=apc.so extension=hash.so extension=phar.so extension=zip.so extension=zlib.so extension=iconv.so extension=mysql.so extension=pdo.so extension=pdo_sqlite.so extension=sqlite3.so extension=json.so extension=tokenizer.so extension=filter.so extension=posix.so extension=ctype.so extension=dom.so extension=simplexml.so extension=xml.so extension=xmlreader.so extension=xmlwriter.so extension=session.so Disclaimer: http://www.ose.nl/email From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 07:02:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6EA8106566B for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 07:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFBF8FC12 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 07:02:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T8n9G-0003uE-30 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 09:02:10 +0200 Received: from pool-173-79-96-198.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.96.198]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 09:02:10 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-96-198.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 09:02:10 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 03:02:14 -0400 Lines: 39 Message-ID: References: <5044C2FC.5050703@ifdnrg.com> <50459ED4.3020804@ose.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-96-198.washdc.fios.verizon.net Subject: Re: Error after upgrading to php 5.4.6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 07:02:09 -0000 Bas Smeelen wrote: [snip] > > My previous response was sent too early :( > > I still get errors in apache > [Tue Sep 04 08:14:42 2012] [error] [client 192.168.1.189] PHP Warning: > Unknown: Unable to allocate memory for pool. in Unknown on line 0, > referer: > http://sys.ose.nl/cacti/graph_view.php?action=tree&tree_id=1&leaf_id=21 > [Tue Sep 04 08:14:43 2012] [notice] child pid 56172 exit signal > [Segmentation > fault (11) > [Tue Sep 04 08:14:43 2012] [notice] child pid 56163 exit signal > [Segmentation > fault (11) > [Tue Sep 04 08:14:53 2012] [error] [client 192.168.1.189] PHP Warning: > Unknown: Unable to allocate memory for pool. in Unknown on line 0, > referer: > http://sys.ose.nl/cacti/graph_view.php?action=tree&tree_id=1&leaf_id=7 > [Tue Sep 04 08:15:59 2012] [notice] child pid 56169 exit signal > [Segmentation > fault (11) > > So now I will comment out all extensions and start investigating. > Well it turns out to be apc.so, this comes with core php I guess? > For completeness: The php manual states this is for alternative php cache. > http://php.net/manual/en/book.apc.php I use xcache. However, whenever I rebuild PHP I also rebuild xcache. Sometimes when the change is very small you may get away with not doing it, but whenever updating between major versions it is a must. I had this happen one time too many and just got into the habit of whenever I rebuild/update PHP I rebuild xcache as well. I believe it pulls in includes form PHP during it's build process so if PHP changes too much xcache will segfault, or just outright refuse to load. [snip] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 07:58:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB331106564A for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 07:58:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chiehhan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6F58FC0A for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 07:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadr6 with SMTP id r6so4025231dad.13 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 00:58:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:x-mailer:x-priority:mime-version :content-type; bh=7lSCfdSHn9U0uTXXNC/PYAszOLX1YQcxiYLiP6f1bAM=; b=B+0KiJ4HBIcvZpgEZzxKfxho0EJIYTJTBXqiCgD4DQwEeKPT3XZHN52Ly03fIOMFCh 3pX1GVRszPfFeOy8ks0CkLCAHbCgv01tS2NqBfPs7Nw9k094D8E7AjQRfqlDMilGCBOj 6vKiY4vM17P0/r5Tvp/00scWrfzXeF38iQS0Wqumwgv+/ZV4SPlbIh1Qb8To9ZJtfPdq Ai6P2Z+TlgDKXXzNkdghsfqTPpX10nH1bM2cmfcQXZ1QArIFf/jJsEUrU+dLILn5qkZy JUUDtZn/Ts4vietxe9y57AXHu739i3kPKI1mN6GakGzU9+XhnGDQLOS0JjDPsgAKuZt+ p+VQ== Received: by 10.68.194.169 with SMTP id hx9mr43853041pbc.8.1346745501430; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 00:58:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gha-PC ([117.136.11.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id wf7sm11675253pbc.34.2012.09.04.00.58.12 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 04 Sep 2012 00:58:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5045b49c.27f1440a.422f.1dc4@mx.google.com> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:58:15 +0800 From: "chiehhan" To: "freebsd-questions" X-Mailer: NetEase Flash Mail 2.2.1.16 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: asking for help about "acpi_tz0: _CRT value is absurd, ignored (256.0C) " X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 07:58:27 -0000 VG8gd2hvbSBtYXkgY29uY2VybiwNCg0KSSBhbSBhIGdyZWVuaG9ybiBpbiB0aGUgZmllbGQgb2Yg ZnJlZWJzZC5BbmQgd2hlbiBJIGluc3RhbGwgRnJlZWJzZDkuMCBvbiBteSBsYXB0b3AgSFAgTlg2 MzMwLGEgY29udHJvbCBzcGFtICJhY3BpX3R6MDogX0NSVCB2YWx1ZSBpcyBhYnN1cmQsIGlnbm9y ZWQgKDI1Ni4wQykib2NjdXJzLg0KDQpJIGxlYXJuZWQgc29tZSByZWZlcmVuY2UgYWJvdXQgc3lz Y3RsIGFuZCByZXZpc2VkIHRoZSBjb25maWd1cmUgZmlsZSBzeXNjdGwuY29uZixhZGRpbmcgdHdv IGxpbmVzIGJlbG93IGludG8gc3lzY3RsLmNvbmY6DQpody5hY3BpLnRoZXJtYWwudXNlcl9vdmVy cmlkZT0xIA0KaHcuYWNwaS50aGVybWFsLnR6MC5fQ1JUPTExMC4wQyANCmJ1dCB0aGUgY29udHJv bCBzcGFtIHJlbWFpbnMuDQoNCkkgcmVhZCB0aGUgc291cmNlIGNvZGUgYWJvdXQgYWNwaV90aGVy bWFsLmMsYnV0IHN0aWxsIGhhdmUgbm8gaWRlYSBhYm91dCBob3cgdG8gc29sdmUgdGhpcyBwcm9i bGVtLkkgYW0gYSBsaXR0bGUgZGVzcGVyYXRlZCBhbmQgdHVybiBmcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9uc0Bm cmVlYnNkLm9yZyBmb3IgaGVscC5Xb3VsZCB5b3UgcGxlYXNlIHNlbmQgbWUgYSBzb2x1dGlvbj8g DQoNCk15IGRtZXNnIGlzIGJlbG93cywNCkNvcHlyaWdodCAoYykgMTk5Mi0yMDEyIFRoZSBGcmVl QlNEIFByb2plY3QuDQpDb3B5cmlnaHQgKGMpIDE5NzksIDE5ODAsIDE5ODMsIDE5ODYsIDE5ODgs IDE5ODksIDE5OTEsIDE5OTIsIDE5OTMsIDE5OTQNCiAgICAgICAgVGhlIFJlZ2VudHMgb2YgdGhl IFVuaXZlcnNpdHkgb2YgQ2FsaWZvcm5pYS4gQWxsIHJpZ2h0cyByZXNlcnZlZC4NCkZyZWVCU0Qg aXMgYSByZWdpc3RlcmVkIHRyYWRlbWFyayBvZiBUaGUgRnJlZUJTRCBGb3VuZGF0aW9uLg0KRnJl ZUJTRCA5LjAtUkVMRUFTRSAjMDogVHVlIEphbiAgMyAwNzoxNToyNSBVVEMgMjAxMg0KICAgIHJv b3RAb2JyaWFuLmNzZS5idWZmYWxvLmVkdTovdXNyL29iai91c3Ivc3JjL3N5cy9HRU5FUklDIGkz ODYNCkNQVTogSW50ZWwoUikgQ29yZShUTSkyIENQVSAgICAgICAgIFQ1NjAwICBAIDEuODNHSHog KDE4MjguNzktTUh6IDY4Ni1jbGFzcyBDUFUpDQogIE9yaWdpbiA9ICJHZW51aW5lSW50ZWwiICBJ ZCA9IDB4NmY2ICBGYW1pbHkgPSA2ICBNb2RlbCA9IGYgIFN0ZXBwaW5nID0gNg0KICBGZWF0dXJl cz0weGJmZWJmYmZmPEZQVSxWTUUsREUsUFNFLFRTQyxNU1IsUEFFLE1DRSxDWDgsQVBJQyxTRVAs TVRSUixQR0UsTUNBLENNT1YsUEFULFBTRTM2LENMRkxVU0gsRFRTLEFDUEksTU1YLEZYU1IsU1NF LFNTRTIsU1MsSFRULFRNLFBCRT4NCiAgRmVhdHVyZXMyPTB4ZTNiZDxTU0UzLERURVM2NCxNT04s RFNfQ1BMLFZNWCxFU1QsVE0yLFNTU0UzLENYMTYseFRQUixQRENNPg0KICBBTUQgRmVhdHVyZXM9 MHgyMDEwMDAwMDxOWCxMTT4NCiAgQU1EIEZlYXR1cmVzMj0weDE8TEFIRj4NCiAgVFNDOiBQLXN0 YXRlIGludmFyaWFudCwgcGVyZm9ybWFuY2Ugc3RhdGlzdGljcw0KcmVhbCBtZW1vcnkgID0gMTYx MDYxMjczNiAoMTUzNiBNQikNCmF2YWlsIG1lbW9yeSA9IDE1NTg5Mjk0MDggKDE0ODYgTUIpDQpF dmVudCB0aW1lciAiTEFQSUMiIHF1YWxpdHkgNDAwDQpBQ1BJIEFQSUMgVGFibGU6IDxIUCAgICAg MzAyMSAgICA+DQpGcmVlQlNEL1NNUDogTXVsdGlwcm9jZXNzb3IgU3lzdGVtIERldGVjdGVkOiAy IENQVXMNCkZyZWVCU0QvU01QOiAxIHBhY2thZ2UocykgeCAyIGNvcmUocykNCmNwdTAgKEJTUCk6 IEFQSUMgSUQ6ICAwDQpjcHUxIChBUCk6IEFQSUMgSUQ6ICAxDQppb2FwaWMwOiBDaGFuZ2luZyBB UElDIElEIHRvIDENCmlvYXBpYzAgPFZlcnNpb24gMi4wPiBpcnFzIDAtMjMgb24gbW90aGVyYm9h cmQNCmtiZDEgYXQga2JkbXV4MA0KYWNwaTA6IDxIUFFPRU0gU0xJQy1NUEM+IG9uIG1vdGhlcmJv YXJkDQphY3BpMDogUG93ZXIgQnV0dG9uIChmaXhlZCkNCmFjcGkwOiByZXNlcnZhdGlvbiBvZiAw LCBhMDAwMCAoMykgZmFpbGVkDQphY3BpMDogcmVzZXJ2YXRpb24gb2YgMTAwMDAwLCA1ZmYwMDAw MCAoMykgZmFpbGVkDQpUaW1lY291bnRlciAiQUNQSS1mYXN0IiBmcmVxdWVuY3kgMzU3OTU0NSBI eiBxdWFsaXR5IDkwMA0KYWNwaV90aW1lcjA6IDwyNC1iaXQgdGltZXIgYXQgMy41Nzk1NDVNSHo+ IHBvcnQgMHgxMDA4LTB4MTAwYiBvbiBhY3BpMA0KY3B1MDogPEFDUEkgQ1BVPiBvbiBhY3BpMA0K Y3B1MTogPEFDUEkgQ1BVPiBvbiBhY3BpMA0KYWNwaV9lYzA6IDxFbWJlZGRlZCBDb250cm9sbGVy OiBHUEUgMHgxNj4gcG9ydCAweDYyLDB4NjYgb24gYWNwaTANCnBjaWIwOiA8QUNQSSBIb3N0LVBD SSBicmlkZ2U+IHBvcnQgMHhjZjgtMHhjZmYgb24gYWNwaTANCnBjaWIwOiBMZW5ndGggbWlzbWF0 Y2ggZm9yIDMgcmFuZ2U6IDExZmYwMDAgdnMgMTFmZWZmZg0KcGNpMDogPEFDUEkgUENJIGJ1cz4g b24gcGNpYjANCnBjaWIxOiA8QUNQSSBQQ0ktUENJIGJyaWRnZT4gaXJxIDE2IGF0IGRldmljZSAx LjAgb24gcGNpMA0KcGNpMTogPEFDUEkgUENJIGJ1cz4gb24gcGNpYjENCnZnYXBjaTA6IDxWR0Et Y29tcGF0aWJsZSBkaXNwbGF5PiBwb3J0IDB4NDAwMC0weDQwZmYgbWVtIDB4ZDgwMDAwMDAtMHhk ZmZmZmZmZiwweGU0NDAwMDAwLTB4ZTQ0MGZmZmYgaXJxIDE2IGF0IGRldmljZSAwLjAgb24gcGNp MQ0KaGRhYzA6IDxJbnRlbCA4MjgwMUcgSGlnaCBEZWZpbml0aW9uIEF1ZGlvIENvbnRyb2xsZXI+ IG1lbSAweGU0NTAwMDAwLTB4ZTQ1MDNmZmYgaXJxIDE2IGF0IGRldmljZSAyNy4wIG9uIHBjaTAN CnBjaWIyOiA8QUNQSSBQQ0ktUENJIGJyaWRnZT4gaXJxIDE2IGF0IGRldmljZSAyOC4wIG9uIHBj aTANCnBjaTg6IDxBQ1BJIFBDSSBidXM+IG9uIHBjaWIyDQpwY2liMzogPEFDUEkgUENJLVBDSSBi cmlkZ2U+IGlycSAxNyBhdCBkZXZpY2UgMjguMSBvbiBwY2kwDQpwY2kxNjogPEFDUEkgUENJIGJ1 cz4gb24gcGNpYjMNCndwaTA6IDxJbnRlbChSKSBQUk8vV2lyZWxlc3MgMzk0NUFCRz4gbWVtIDB4 ZTQwMDAwMDAtMHhlNDAwMGZmZiBpcnEgMTcgYXQgZGV2aWNlIDAuMCBvbiBwY2kxNg0KcGNpYjQ6 IDxBQ1BJIFBDSS1QQ0kgYnJpZGdlPiBpcnEgMTkgYXQgZGV2aWNlIDI4LjMgb24gcGNpMA0KcGNp MzI6IDxBQ1BJIFBDSSBidXM+IG9uIHBjaWI0DQp1aGNpMDogPEludGVsIDgyODAxRyAoSUNINykg VVNCIGNvbnRyb2xsZXIgVVNCLUE+IHBvcnQgMHg1MDAwLTB4NTAxZiBpcnEgMjAgYXQgZGV2aWNl IDI5LjAgb24gcGNpMA0KdWhjaTA6IExlZ1N1cCA9IDB4MmYwMA0KdXNidXMwOiA8SW50ZWwgODI4 MDFHIChJQ0g3KSBVU0IgY29udHJvbGxlciBVU0ItQT4gb24gdWhjaTANCnVoY2kxOiA8SW50ZWwg ODI4MDFHIChJQ0g3KSBVU0IgY29udHJvbGxlciBVU0ItQj4gcG9ydCAweDUwMjAtMHg1MDNmIGly cSAyMSBhdCBkZXZpY2UgMjkuMSBvbiBwY2kwDQp1aGNpMTogTGVnU3VwID0gMHgyZjAwDQp1c2J1 czE6IDxJbnRlbCA4MjgwMUcgKElDSDcpIFVTQiBjb250cm9sbGVyIFVTQi1CPiBvbiB1aGNpMQ0K dWhjaTI6IDxJbnRlbCA4MjgwMUcgKElDSDcpIFVTQiBjb250cm9sbGVyIFVTQi1DPiBwb3J0IDB4 NTA0MC0weDUwNWYgaXJxIDE4IGF0IGRldmljZSAyOS4yIG9uIHBjaTANCnVoY2kyOiBMZWdTdXAg PSAweDJmMDANCnVzYnVzMjogPEludGVsIDgyODAxRyAoSUNINykgVVNCIGNvbnRyb2xsZXIgVVNC LUM+IG9uIHVoY2kyDQp1aGNpMzogPEludGVsIDgyODAxRyAoSUNINykgVVNCIGNvbnRyb2xsZXIg VVNCLUQ+IHBvcnQgMHg1MDYwLTB4NTA3ZiBpcnEgMTkgYXQgZGV2aWNlIDI5LjMgb24gcGNpMA0K dWhjaTM6IExlZ1N1cCA9IDB4MmYwMA0KdXNidXMzOiA8SW50ZWwgODI4MDFHIChJQ0g3KSBVU0Ig Y29udHJvbGxlciBVU0ItRD4gb24gdWhjaTMNCmVoY2kwOiA8SW50ZWwgODI4MDFHQi9SIChJQ0g3 KSBVU0IgMi4wIGNvbnRyb2xsZXI+IG1lbSAweGU0NTA0MDAwLTB4ZTQ1MDQzZmYgaXJxIDIwIGF0 IGRldmljZSAyOS43IG9uIHBjaTANCnVzYnVzNDogRUhDSSB2ZXJzaW9uIDEuMA0KdXNidXM0OiA8 SW50ZWwgODI4MDFHQi9SIChJQ0g3KSBVU0IgMi4wIGNvbnRyb2xsZXI+IG9uIGVoY2kwDQpwY2li NTogPEFDUEkgUENJLVBDSSBicmlkZ2U+IGF0IGRldmljZSAzMC4wIG9uIHBjaTANCnBjaTI6IDxB Q1BJIFBDSSBidXM+IG9uIHBjaWI1DQpjYmIwOiA8UENJLUNhcmRCdXMgQnJpZGdlPiBtZW0gMHhl NDEwMDAwMC0weGU0MTAwZmZmIGlycSAxOCBhdCBkZXZpY2UgNi4wIG9uIHBjaTINCmNhcmRidXMw OiA8Q2FyZEJ1cyBidXM+IG9uIGNiYjANCnBjY2FyZDA6IDwxNi1iaXQgUENDYXJkIGJ1cz4gb24g Y2JiMA0KcGNpMjogPG1hc3Mgc3RvcmFnZT4gYXQgZGV2aWNlIDYuMiAobm8gZHJpdmVyIGF0dGFj aGVkKQ0KcGNpMjogPGJhc2UgcGVyaXBoZXJhbCwgU0QgaG9zdCBjb250cm9sbGVyPiBhdCBkZXZp Y2UgNi4zIChubyBkcml2ZXIgYXR0YWNoZWQpDQpwY2kyOiA8c2ltcGxlIGNvbW1zPiBhdCBkZXZp Y2UgNi40IChubyBkcml2ZXIgYXR0YWNoZWQpDQpiZ2UwOiA8QnJvYWRjb20gTmV0WHRyZW1lIEdp Z2FiaXQgRXRoZXJuZXQgQ29udHJvbGxlciwgQVNJQyByZXYuIDB4MDAzMDAzPiBtZW0gMHhlNDEx MDAwMC0weGU0MTFmZmZmIGlycSAxNiBhdCBkZXZpY2UgMTQuMCBvbiBwY2kyDQpiZ2UwOiBDSElQ IElEIDB4MDAwMDMwMDM7IEFTSUMgUkVWIDB4MDM7IENISVAgUkVWIDB4MzA7IFBDSQ0KbWlpYnVz MDogPE1JSSBidXM+IG9uIGJnZTANCmJyZ3BoeTA6IDxCQ001NzA1IDEwMDBCQVNFLVQgbWVkaWEg aW50ZXJmYWNlPiBQSFkgMSBvbiBtaWlidXMwDQpicmdwaHkwOiAgMTBiYXNlVCwgMTBiYXNlVC1G RFgsIDEwMGJhc2VUWCwgMTAwYmFzZVRYLUZEWCwgMTAwMGJhc2VULCAxMDAwYmFzZVQtbWFzdGVy LCAxMDAwYmFzZVQtRkRYLCAxMDAwYmFzZVQtRkRYLW1hc3RlciwgYXV0bywgYXV0by1mbG93DQpi Z2UwOiBFdGhlcm5ldCBhZGRyZXNzOiAwMDoxNzowODo0OTo2YzplOA0KaXNhYjA6IDxQQ0ktSVNB IGJyaWRnZT4gYXQgZGV2aWNlIDMxLjAgb24gcGNpMA0KaXNhMDogPElTQSBidXM+IG9uIGlzYWIw DQphdGFwY2kwOiA8SW50ZWwgSUNIN00gU0FUQTE1MCBjb250cm9sbGVyPiBwb3J0IDB4MWYwLTB4 MWY3LDB4M2Y2LDB4MTcwLTB4MTc3LDB4Mzc2LDB4NTA4MC0weDUwOGYgaXJxIDE3IGF0IGRldmlj ZSAzMS4yIG9uIHBjaTANCmF0YTA6IDxBVEEgY2hhbm5lbCAwPiBvbiBhdGFwY2kwDQphdGExOiA8 QVRBIGNoYW5uZWwgMT4gb24gYXRhcGNpMA0KYmF0dGVyeTA6IDxBQ1BJIENvbnRyb2wgTWV0aG9k IEJhdHRlcnk+IG9uIGFjcGkwDQpiYXR0ZXJ5MTogPEFDUEkgQ29udHJvbCBNZXRob2QgQmF0dGVy eT4gb24gYWNwaTANCmFjcGlfYWNhZDA6IDxBQyBBZGFwdGVyPiBvbiBhY3BpMA0KYWNwaV9idXR0 b24wOiA8U2xlZXAgQnV0dG9uPiBvbiBhY3BpMA0KYWNwaV9saWQwOiA8Q29udHJvbCBNZXRob2Qg TGlkIFN3aXRjaD4gb24gYWNwaTANCmFjcGlfdHowOiA8VGhlcm1hbCBab25lPiBvbiBhY3BpMA0K YWNwaV90ejA6IF9DUlQgdmFsdWUgaXMgYWJzdXJkLCBpZ25vcmVkICgyNTYuMEMpDQphY3BpX3R6 MTogPFRoZXJtYWwgWm9uZT4gb24gYWNwaTANCmFjcGlfdHoyOiA8VGhlcm1hbCBab25lPiBvbiBh Y3BpMA0KYWNwaV90ejM6IDxUaGVybWFsIFpvbmU+IG9uIGFjcGkwDQphY3BpX3R6NDogPFRoZXJt YWwgWm9uZT4gb24gYWNwaTANCmF0dGltZXIwOiA8QVQgdGltZXI+IHBvcnQgMHg0MC0weDQzIGly cSAwIG9uIGFjcGkwDQpUaW1lY291bnRlciAiaTgyNTQiIGZyZXF1ZW5jeSAxMTkzMTgyIEh6IHF1 YWxpdHkgMA0KRXZlbnQgdGltZXIgImk4MjU0IiBmcmVxdWVuY3kgMTE5MzE4MiBIeiBxdWFsaXR5 IDEwMA0KYXRydGMwOiA8QVQgcmVhbHRpbWUgY2xvY2s+IHBvcnQgMHg3MC0weDcxLDB4NzItMHg3 MyBpcnEgOCBvbiBhY3BpMA0KRXZlbnQgdGltZXIgIlJUQyIgZnJlcXVlbmN5IDMyNzY4IEh6IHF1 YWxpdHkgMA0KaHBldDA6IDxIaWdoIFByZWNpc2lvbiBFdmVudCBUaW1lcj4gaW9tZW0gMHhmZWQw MDAwMC0weGZlZDAwM2ZmIG9uIGFjcGkwDQpUaW1lY291bnRlciAiSFBFVCIgZnJlcXVlbmN5IDE0 MzE4MTgwIEh6IHF1YWxpdHkgOTUwDQpFdmVudCB0aW1lciAiSFBFVCIgZnJlcXVlbmN5IDE0MzE4 MTgwIEh6IHF1YWxpdHkgNDUwDQpFdmVudCB0aW1lciAiSFBFVDEiIGZyZXF1ZW5jeSAxNDMxODE4 MCBIeiBxdWFsaXR5IDQ0MA0KRXZlbnQgdGltZXIgIkhQRVQyIiBmcmVxdWVuY3kgMTQzMTgxODAg SHogcXVhbGl0eSA0NDANCmF0a2JkYzA6IDxLZXlib2FyZCBjb250cm9sbGVyIChpODA0Mik+IHBv cnQgMHg2MCwweDY0IGlycSAxIG9uIGFjcGkwDQphdGtiZDA6IDxBVCBLZXlib2FyZD4gaXJxIDEg b24gYXRrYmRjMA0Ka2JkMCBhdCBhdGtiZDANCmF0a2JkMDogW0dJQU5ULUxPQ0tFRF0NCnBzbTA6 IDxQUy8yIE1vdXNlPiBpcnEgMTIgb24gYXRrYmRjMA0KcHNtMDogW0dJQU5ULUxPQ0tFRF0NCnBz bTA6IG1vZGVsIEludGVsbGlNb3VzZSwgZGV2aWNlIElEIDMNCnVhcnQwOiA8MTY1NTAgb3IgY29t cGF0aWJsZT4gcG9ydCAweDNmOC0weDNmZiBpcnEgNCBmbGFncyAweDEwIG9uIGFjcGkwDQpwcGMw OiA8UGFyYWxsZWwgcG9ydD4gcG9ydCAweDM3OC0weDM3ZiwweDc3OC0weDc3YSBpcnEgNyBkcnEg MSBvbiBhY3BpMA0KcHBjMDogU01DLWxpa2UgY2hpcHNldCAoRUNQL0VQUC9QUzIvTklCQkxFKSBp biBDT01QQVRJQkxFIG1vZGUNCnBwYzA6IEZJRk8gd2l0aCAxNi8xNi84IGJ5dGVzIHRocmVzaG9s ZA0KcHBidXMwOiA8UGFyYWxsZWwgcG9ydCBidXM+IG9uIHBwYzANCnBsaXAwOiA8UExJUCBuZXR3 b3JrIGludGVyZmFjZT4gb24gcHBidXMwDQpscHQwOiA8UHJpbnRlcj4gb24gcHBidXMwDQpscHQw OiBJbnRlcnJ1cHQtZHJpdmVuIHBvcnQNCnBwaTA6IDxQYXJhbGxlbCBJL08+IG9uIHBwYnVzMA0K cG10aW1lcjAgb24gaXNhMA0Kc2MwOiA8U3lzdGVtIGNvbnNvbGU+IGF0IGZsYWdzIDB4MTAwIG9u IGlzYTANCnNjMDogVkdBIDwxNiB2aXJ0dWFsIGNvbnNvbGVzLCBmbGFncz0weDMwMD4NCnZnYTA6 IDxHZW5lcmljIElTQSBWR0E+IGF0IHBvcnQgMHgzYzAtMHgzZGYgaW9tZW0gMHhhMDAwMC0weGJm ZmZmIG9uIGlzYTANCmVzdDA6IDxFbmhhbmNlZCBTcGVlZFN0ZXAgRnJlcXVlbmN5IENvbnRyb2w+ IG9uIGNwdTANCnA0dGNjMDogPENQVSBGcmVxdWVuY3kgVGhlcm1hbCBDb250cm9sPiBvbiBjcHUw DQplc3QxOiA8RW5oYW5jZWQgU3BlZWRTdGVwIEZyZXF1ZW5jeSBDb250cm9sPiBvbiBjcHUxDQpw NHRjYzE6IDxDUFUgRnJlcXVlbmN5IFRoZXJtYWwgQ29udHJvbD4gb24gY3B1MQ0KVGltZWNvdW50 ZXJzIHRpY2sgZXZlcnkgMS4wMDAgbXNlYw0KaGRhYzA6IEhEQSBDb2RlYyAjMDogQW5hbG9nIERl dmljZXMgQUQxOTgxSEQNCmhkYWMwOiBIREEgQ29kZWMgIzE6IEx1Y2VudC9BZ2VyZSBTeXN0ZW1z IChVbmtub3duKQ0KcGNtMDogPEhEQSBBbmFsb2cgRGV2aWNlcyBBRDE5ODFIRCBQQ00gIzAgQW5h bG9nPiBhdCBjYWQgMCBuaWQgMSBvbiBoZGFjMA0KdXNidXMwOiAxMk1icHMgRnVsbCBTcGVlZCBV U0IgdjEuMA0KdXNidXMxOiAxMk1icHMgRnVsbCBTcGVlZCBVU0IgdjEuMA0KdXNidXMyOiAxMk1i cHMgRnVsbCBTcGVlZCBVU0IgdjEuMA0KdXNidXMzOiAxMk1icHMgRnVsbCBTcGVlZCBVU0IgdjEu MA0KdXNidXM0OiA0ODBNYnBzIEhpZ2ggU3BlZWQgVVNCIHYyLjANCnVnZW4wLjE6IDxJbnRlbD4g YXQgdXNidXMwDQp1aHViMDogPEludGVsIFVIQ0kgcm9vdCBIVUIsIGNsYXNzIDkvMCwgcmV2IDEu MDAvMS4wMCwgYWRkciAxPiBvbiB1c2J1czANCnVnZW4xLjE6IDxJbnRlbD4gYXQgdXNidXMxDQp1 aHViMTogPEludGVsIFVIQ0kgcm9vdCBIVUIsIGNsYXNzIDkvMCwgcmV2IDEuMDAvMS4wMCwgYWRk ciAxPiBvbiB1c2J1czENCnVnZW4yLjE6IDxJbnRlbD4gYXQgdXNidXMyDQp1aHViMjogPEludGVs IFVIQ0kgcm9vdCBIVUIsIGNsYXNzIDkvMCwgcmV2IDEuMDAvMS4wMCwgYWRkciAxPiBvbiB1c2J1 czINCnVnZW4zLjE6IDxJbnRlbD4gYXQgdXNidXMzDQp1aHViMzogPEludGVsIFVIQ0kgcm9vdCBI VUIsIGNsYXNzIDkvMCwgcmV2IDEuMDAvMS4wMCwgYWRkciAxPiBvbiB1c2J1czMNCnVnZW40LjE6 IDxJbnRlbD4gYXQgdXNidXM0DQp1aHViNDogPEludGVsIEVIQ0kgcm9vdCBIVUIsIGNsYXNzIDkv MCwgcmV2IDIuMDAvMS4wMCwgYWRkciAxPiBvbiB1c2J1czQNCnVodWIwOiAyIHBvcnRzIHdpdGgg MiByZW1vdmFibGUsIHNlbGYgcG93ZXJlZA0KdWh1YjE6IDIgcG9ydHMgd2l0aCAyIHJlbW92YWJs ZSwgc2VsZiBwb3dlcmVkDQp1aHViMjogMiBwb3J0cyB3aXRoIDIgcmVtb3ZhYmxlLCBzZWxmIHBv d2VyZWQNCnVodWIzOiAyIHBvcnRzIHdpdGggMiByZW1vdmFibGUsIHNlbGYgcG93ZXJlZA0KYWRh MCBhdCBhdGEwIGJ1cyAwIHNjYnVzMCB0YXJnZXQgMCBsdW4gMA0KYWRhMDogPEZVSklUU1UgTUhW MjA4MEJIIFBMIDg5MkM+IEFUQS03IFNBVEEgMS54IGRldmljZQ0KYWRhMDogMTUwLjAwME1CL3Mg dHJhbnNmZXJzIChTQVRBLCBVRE1BNSwgUElPIDgxOTJieXRlcykNCmFkYTA6IDc2MzE5TUIgKDE1 NjMwMTQ4OCA1MTIgYnl0ZSBzZWN0b3JzOiAxNUggNjNTL1QgMTYzODNDKQ0KYWRhMDogUHJldmlv dXNseSB3YXMga25vd24gYXMgYWQwDQpTTVA6IEFQIENQVSAjMSBMYXVuY2hlZCENClRpbWVjb3Vu dGVyICJUU0MtbG93IiBmcmVxdWVuY3kgMTQyODc0MDIgSHogcXVhbGl0eSAxMDAwDQpjZDAgYXQg YXRhMSBidXMgMCBzY2J1czEgdGFyZ2V0IDAgbHVuIDANCmNkMDogPFRTU1Rjb3JwIENEVy9EVkQg VFMtTDQ2MkMgSFAxMD4gUmVtb3ZhYmxlIENELVJPTSBTQ1NJLTAgZGV2aWNlIA0KY2QwOiAxNi43 MDBNQi9zIHRyYW5zZmVycyAoV0RNQTIsIEFUQVBJIDEyYnl0ZXMsIFBJTyA2NTUzNGJ5dGVzKQ0K Y2QwOiBBdHRlbXB0IHRvIHF1ZXJ5IGRldmljZSBzaXplIGZhaWxlZDogTk9UIFJFQURZLCBNZWRp dW0gbm90IHByZXNlbnQgLSB0cmF5IGNsb3NlZA0KYWNwaV90ejA6IF9DUlQgdmFsdWUgaXMgYWJz dXJkLCBpZ25vcmVkICgyNTYuMEMpDQpSb290IG1vdW50IHdhaXRpbmcgZm9yOiB1c2J1czQNClJv b3QgbW91bnQgd2FpdGluZyBmb3I6IHVzYnVzNA0KdWh1YjQ6IDggcG9ydHMgd2l0aCA4IHJlbW92 YWJsZSwgc2VsZiBwb3dlcmVkDQpUcnlpbmcgdG8gbW91bnQgcm9vdCBmcm9tIHVmczovZGV2L2Fk YTBwMiBbcnddLi4uDQp3bGFuMDogRXRoZXJuZXQgYWRkcmVzczogMDA6MTg6ZGU6YWU6NGE6MjQN CndwaTA6IG5lZWQgbXVsdGljYXN0IHVwZGF0ZSBjYWxsYmFjaw0Kd3BpMDogbmVlZCBtdWx0aWNh c3QgdXBkYXRlIGNhbGxiYWNrDQp3cGkwOiBuZWVkIG11bHRpY2FzdCB1cGRhdGUgY2FsbGJhY2sN CndsYW4wOiBsaW5rIHN0YXRlIGNoYW5nZWQgdG8gRE9XTg0Kd2xhbjA6IGxpbmsgc3RhdGUgY2hh bmdlZCB0byBVUA0Kd3BpMDogbmVlZCBtdWx0aWNhc3QgdXBkYXRlIGNhbGxiYWNrDQp3cGkwOiBu ZWVkIG11bHRpY2FzdCB1cGRhdGUgY2FsbGJhY2sNCndsYW4wOiBsaW5rIHN0YXRlIGNoYW5nZWQg dG8gRE9XTg0Kd2xhbjA6IGxpbmsgc3RhdGUgY2hhbmdlZCB0byBVUA0Kd2xhbjA6IGxpbmsgc3Rh dGUgY2hhbmdlZCB0byBET1dODQp3bGFuMDogbGluayBzdGF0ZSBjaGFuZ2VkIHRvIFVQDQp3bGFu MDogbGluayBzdGF0ZSBjaGFuZ2VkIHRvIERPV04NCndsYW4wOiBsaW5rIHN0YXRlIGNoYW5nZWQg dG8gVVANCndsYW4wOiBsaW5rIHN0YXRlIGNoYW5nZWQgdG8gRE9XTg0Kd2xhbjA6IGxpbmsgc3Rh dGUgY2hhbmdlZCB0byBVUA0Kd2xhbjA6IGxpbmsgc3RhdGUgY2hhbmdlZCB0byBET1dODQp3bGFu MDogbGluayBzdGF0ZSBjaGFuZ2VkIHRvIFVQDQp3bGFuMDogbGluayBzdGF0ZSBjaGFuZ2VkIHRv IERPV04NCndsYW4wOiBsaW5rIHN0YXRlIGNoYW5nZWQgdG8gVVANCndsYW4wOiBsaW5rIHN0YXRl IGNoYW5nZWQgdG8gRE9XTg0Kd2xhbjA6IGxpbmsgc3RhdGUgY2hhbmdlZCB0byBVUA0Kd2xhbjA6 IGxpbmsgc3RhdGUgY2hhbmdlZCB0byBET1dODQp3bGFuMDogbGluayBzdGF0ZSBjaGFuZ2VkIHRv IFVQDQoNCg0KMjAxMi0wOS0wNA0KDQoNCg0KY2hpZWhoYW4= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 11:52:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF991065670 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 11:52:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177148FC18 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 11:52:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.37]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 04 Sep 2012 07:52:30 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BQZ53360; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 07:52:29 -0400 Received-SPF: None identity=pra; client-ip=209.6.86.84; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-sender="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Neutral identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.6.86.84; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-sender="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None identity=helo; client-ip=209.6.86.84; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-sender="postmaster@jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received: from 209-6-86-84.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.86.84]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 04 Sep 2012 07:52:30 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20549.60285.377072.391084@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 07:52:29 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: <44ehmj1354.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <5044DC50.7020806@FreeBSD.org> <44a9x712cd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <44ehmiyhfa.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20549.8846.105735.468146@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: Re: [solved]: to move csup 90 to subversion 91rc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 11:52:31 -0000 Darrel writes: > Also, on my amd64 kernel I had to remove 'device atapicam'. > > The failed kernel build might be a bug, perhaps I should file a > report. As far as I know, this is completely unrelated to subversion/c(v)sup. Please check for other issues. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 14:10:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275B41065670 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 14:10:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57A08FC17 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 14:10:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Footer: b3NlLm5s Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits)) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 16:10:11 +0200 Message-ID: <50460BA1.3000206@ose.nl> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 16:09:37 +0200 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5044C2FC.5050703@ifdnrg.com> <50459ED4.3020804@ose.nl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: SOLVED: Re: Error after upgrading to php 5.4.6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:10:18 -0000 On 09/04/2012 09:02 AM, Michael Powell wrote: > Bas Smeelen wrote: > > [snip] >> My previous response was sent too early :( >> >> I still get errors in apache >> [Tue Sep 04 08:14:42 2012] [error] [client 192.168.1.189] PHP Warning: >> Unknown: Unable to allocate memory for pool. in Unknown on line 0, >> referer: >> http://sys.ose.nl/cacti/graph_view.php?action=tree&tree_id=1&leaf_id=21 >> [Tue Sep 04 08:14:43 2012] [notice] child pid 56172 exit signal >> [Segmentation >> fault (11) >> [snip] >> >> Well it turns out to be apc.so, this comes with core php I guess? >> >> [snip] I have found that the faults are present because www/pecl-APC was not recompiled/reinstalled. So I reinstalled www/pecl-APC with portmaster -f and this also reinstalled the following ports: Re-install pecl-APC-3.1.12 Re-install autoconf-2.69 Re-install autoconf-wrapper-20101119 Re-install gmake-3.82_1 Re-install gettext-0.18.1.1 Re-install libiconv-1.14 Re-install libtool-2.4.2 Re-install m4-1.4.16_1,1 Re-install perl-5.12.4_4 Re-install help2man-1.40.11 Re-install p5-Locale-gettext-1.05_3 Re-install php5-5.4.6 Re-install pcre-8.31 Re-install pkgconf-0.8.7_2 Re-install libxml2-2.7.8_3 Re-install apache-2.2.22_6 Re-install apr-ipv6-devrandom-gdbm-db42-1.4.5.1.3.12_1 Re-install db42-4.2.52_5 Re-install gdbm-1.9.1 Re-install automake-1.12.3 Re-install automake-wrapper-20101119 Re-install python27-2.7.3_3 Re-install expat-2.0.1_2 There is nothing about this in UPDATING, should there? This solved the problem anyway. Bas Disclaimer: http://www.ose.nl/email From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 14:14:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05785106564A for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 14:14:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pldrouin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B368FC12 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 14:14:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbgg13 with SMTP id gg13so3938862lbb.13 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 07:14:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1vALXH3qHupgGxseJUAOhdvzYoAJDDRZn9JkSHXu2MQ=; b=LvRj5YA+GMdZjDk0GrullJUx1MJlGv2deMm/m2qYNIK3ULIO2QSRaeKd8kIhfAU6k5 SQP9hYv8YhYLqG1HlBige4JwkWK7fJMGZeTtrwgr2xfttBTyDw3lw+tbRDGJeERani6Q LslTMheP+lnqy2kpEhK+kcD7R86EiAvWefOL+dGoMF9PXn0VWk7OVZxOQuekewZ29I7S TPmiRLpx5NKKeMf+aSMIH0XJ9RcLUi6vGw/8eriqalls7FTZmX+DElYJ5rJp71QrCOCR JAD49UdEUzdcIWDlbtuU3MblHavv4UdoyW+Y748StAWwqjJmpEzZvhdOFMwwV/g2C3DO pjVw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.102.68 with SMTP id fm4mr6666830lbb.19.1346768058856; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 07:14:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.80.168 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 07:14:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 10:14:18 -0400 Message-ID: From: Pierre-Luc Drouin To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: portsnap Generating a "Bad file descriptor" Error Message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:14:21 -0000 Hi, so I have been having problems using portsnap lately. I always get a "Bad file descriptor" message when trying using it on one of my i386 machine: Looking up portsnap5.freebsd.org mirrors... none found. Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap5.freebsd.org... done. Fetching snapshot metadata... done. Fetching snapshot generated at Mon Sep 3 20:04:44 EDT 2012: 86abb3c6f24b24e7fdadda42805f9ae38f487177dcb949 0% of 67 MB 0 Bps fetch: http://portsnap5.freebsd.org/s/86abb3c6f24b24e7fdadda42805f9ae38f487177dcb9493f5e0cb4f792490b2f.tgz: Bad file descriptor fetch: 86abb3c6f24b24e7fdadda42805f9ae38f487177dcb9493f5e0cb4f792490b2f.tgz: Bad file descriptor I tried fsck -y the /var, /tmp and /usr partitions and everything seems fine. What could the problem be? Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 14:21:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FEBC106566B for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 14:21:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B9E8FC15 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 14:21:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Footer: b3NlLm5s Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits)) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 16:21:19 +0200 Message-ID: <50460E3E.6010303@ose.nl> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 16:20:46 +0200 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5044C2FC.5050703@ifdnrg.com> <50459ED4.3020804@ose.nl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: SOLVED: Re: Error after upgrading to php 5.4.6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:21:21 -0000 On 09/04/2012 09:02 AM, Michael Powell wrote: > Bas Smeelen wrote: > > [snip] >> My previous response was sent too early :( >> >> I still get errors in apache >> [Tue Sep 04 08:14:42 2012] [error] [client 192.168.1.189] PHP Warning: >> Unknown: Unable to allocate memory for pool. in Unknown on line 0, >> referer: >> http://sys.ose.nl/cacti/graph_view.php?action=tree&tree_id=1&leaf_id=21 >> [Tue Sep 04 08:14:43 2012] [notice] child pid 56172 exit signal >> [Segmentation >> fault (11) >> [snip] >> >> Well it turns out to be apc.so, this comes with core php I guess? >> >> [snip] Sorry, this just delays the error but it eventually comes back so I'll keep apc.so commented. I have found that the faults are present because www/pecl-APC was not recompiled/reinstalled. So I reinstalled www/pecl-APC with portmaster -f and this also reinstalled the following ports: Re-install pecl-APC-3.1.12 Re-install autoconf-2.69 Re-install autoconf-wrapper-20101119 Re-install gmake-3.82_1 Re-install gettext-0.18.1.1 Re-install libiconv-1.14 Re-install libtool-2.4.2 Re-install m4-1.4.16_1,1 Re-install perl-5.12.4_4 Re-install help2man-1.40.11 Re-install p5-Locale-gettext-1.05_3 Re-install php5-5.4.6 Re-install pcre-8.31 Re-install pkgconf-0.8.7_2 Re-install libxml2-2.7.8_3 Re-install apache-2.2.22_6 Re-install apr-ipv6-devrandom-gdbm-db42-1.4.5.1.3.12_1 Re-install db42-4.2.52_5 Re-install gdbm-1.9.1 Re-install automake-1.12.3 Re-install automake-wrapper-20101119 Re-install python27-2.7.3_3 Re-install expat-2.0.1_2 There is nothing about this in UPDATING, should there? This solved the problem anyway. Bas Disclaimer: http://www.ose.nl/email From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 16:05:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782DE10656A4 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 16:05:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ilegis.return+7865095@gmail.com) Received: from li108-176.members.linode.com (li108-176.members.linode.com [69.164.193.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE1C8FC0C for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 16:05:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by li108-176.members.linode.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A23B232D22 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 16:05:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 16:05:06 +0000 From: Walton Carpes To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <504626b2821f0_563410134c417196288@li108-176.mail> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Aos meus amigos e aos amigos de meus amigos. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 16:05:07 -0000 Quando a gente vota, escolhe os candidatos que ir=C3=A3o nos representar = na busca do Bem Comum, que todos n=C3=B3s buscamos.Compet=C3=AAncia, seri= edade, comportamento =C3=A9tico e dignidade s=C3=A3o qualidades que, embo= ra raras, todos os pol=C3=ADticos deviam ter. Mas infelizmente nem todos = t=C3=AAm.Por isso, vou votar num pol=C3=ADtico que sei que, al=C3=A9m de = cultivar e praticar esses valores, =C3=A9 coerente com eles e trabalha mu= ito, mesmo.Trata-se do JO=C3=83O CARLOS NEDEL =E2=80=93 11633, o vereador= que mais trabalha o dia-a-dia da cidade.Para saber a raz=C3=A3o da minha= escolha,=C2=A0clique=C2=A0aqui.Depois disso, repasse este e-mail a seus = amigos e conhecidos, para que tamb=C3=A9m eles possam valorizar os seus v= otos, votando emJO=C3=83O CARLOS NEDEL n=C2=BA 11633=C2=A0Um grande abra=C3= =A7o.=C2=A0Walton Carpes=C2=A0= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 17:11:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 837251065670 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 17:11:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A4C8FC20 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 17:11:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ialo14 with SMTP id o14so11916404ial.13 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:11:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=wz2TRjmlUmMOxapEYLUMBkCfcyawNZW7/sBdqVlxMok=; b=PX6QOFpm/+0RYSBXlUkULaPcxyHGpvgWxAEywHbXmiM5oEUOSYMtyBtwaFKVtP6ePs e7ezAudH8X/T1BZnlbyqu2ALOnpf//RYd5ZiNUwcnT7f4SjEeGZBAAHqBwBbBg7EcKC9 mCSzb9nKupYL+Lg0/jWA0Jq4pERDuassbwCdHXJS7h/yF14xZ6PSVwbjWKfVnMFv1f4g VJe1nPtaCOLlNY5htGDPhW1E+8Y64d0F0mRifWJ9OHnsuxKvL853IOneYdi26O/KkV3W n6Cr6UDTDy5RozEZ5QcBupN+AWx0lX715uEnlDhP5eCHTs/KBCOkFJuEgN8BXLN6y6vP mntA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.186.229 with SMTP id fn5mr15020512igc.72.1346778683399; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.131.129 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 10:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 14:11:23 -0300 Message-ID: From: Mario Lobo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkI80QeDQdrJ7b3A/4Hcheol959vZx84Zdwbu4MAWNBWmHXdQyqosC4PXJlYHF6FhzdWzjS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Firefox install problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 17:11:24 -0000 Hi; env: FBSD 8.3-STABLE AMD64 Firefox 15 port The problem seems to be with the porting itself. The first problem showed up during configure. Libvpx could not be found and configure stops. After examining Config.Log, I found a compiler switch like this: -L/usr/local/lib/nss I made a symlink there to libvpx.so and the port compiled without errors. Then after issuing a make install, this comes up everytime: [Snip] a ./searchplugins/yahoo.xml a ./dictionaries/en-US.aff a ./dictionaries/en-US.dic a ./defaults/pref a ./defaults/pref/channel-prefs.js a ./chrome/icons a ./chrome/icons/default a ./chrome/icons/default/default16.png a ./chrome/icons/default/default32.png a ./chrome/icons/default/default48.png /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/config/nsinstall -D /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/bin rm -f -f /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/bin/firefox ln -s /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/firefox/firefox /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/bin gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/browser/installer' echo 'share/applications/firefox.desktop' >> /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/plist_files echo "@dirrmtry share/applications" >> /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/plist_dirs echo 'share/pixmaps/firefox.png' >> /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/plist_files /bin/mkdir -p /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/libdata /bin/mv -f /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/pkgconfig /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/libdata/ || true mv: rename /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/pkgconfig to /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/libdata/pkgconfig: No such file or directory /bin/rm -f /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/pkgconfig cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/include *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. All the fixes I googled that could relate to this, date back to 2005 the latest,, and none of them helped. I've been trying to fix this for 2 days now and I'm not getting anywhere so I can only hope someone can shed a light on this problem here on the list.. My sincere thanks to whoever points me a direction. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 18:19:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A3D106564A for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 18:19:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lifefornazgul@mail.ru) Received: from fallback3.mail.ru (fallback3.mail.ru [94.100.176.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A5E8FC08 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 18:19:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from f11.mail.ru (f11.mail.ru [217.69.129.69]) by fallback3.mail.ru (mPOP.Fallback_MX) with ESMTP id 5E871BD8C8B2 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 22:04:45 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ru; s=mail; h=Content-Type:Message-ID:Reply-To:Date:Mime-Version:Subject:To:From; bh=A1djjtZFcxslOX4lq8j9kJ7V7zus6Wx+um1OxUdjwWo=; b=p75bKStTcpH3sLGDzSKJq6uAA7FDWmIU8UyDrttzDE0+Nt3L3RztZ7brbN24TwyXP6Rr1G6zAfjU76po89r8s8Cl61p83wZ54QUBbua69ACo3tOUSf8yWYAoFf+yJ/PA; Received: from mail by f11.mail.ru with local (envelope-from ) id 1T8xUL-0003Z2-DG for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 22:04:37 +0400 Received: from [193.109.166.252] by e.mail.ru with HTTP; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 22:04:37 +0400 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWF4aW0gR2Fsa2lu?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [193.109.166.252] Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 22:04:37 +0400 X-Priority: Message-ID: <1346781877.90463486@f11.mail.ru> X-Spam: Not detected X-Mras: Ok Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Error with "Coretemp" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?UTF-8?B?TWF4aW0gR2Fsa2lu?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:19:05 -0000 CkhlbGxvLCBteSBuYW1lIGlzIE1heGltLiBDYW4gdSBoZWxwIG1lIHdpdGggbXkgcXVlc3Rpb24/ Ckkgd2FudCB0byBrbm93IHRoZSB0ZW1wZXJhdHVyZSBvZiB0aGUgQ1BVIHdpdGggdGhlIHZhbHVl cyDigIvigItvZiBzeXNjdGwuClRoZSBjb21tYW5kICJzeXNjdGwtYSB8IGdyZXAgdGVtcGUiIC4u LiBhbnkgcmVzdWx0cwoKSSByZWJ1aWx0IHRoZSBrZXJuZWwgd2l0aCB0aGUgcmVtYXJrOgpkZXZp Y2UgY29yZXRlbXAKCmp1c3QgdHJ5aW5nIHRvIGFkZCBhIG1vZHVsZSB3aXRoIGtsZGxvYWQuCgoK IyBrbGRzdGF0Ck1heSAxIDB4YzA0MDAwMDAgYjY1OTQ0IGtlcm5lbApGZWJydWFyeSAxIDB4YzBm NjYwMDAgMjJkMCBhY2NmX2h0dHAua28KTWFyY2ggMSAweGMwZjY5MDAwIDMwZDQgY29yZXRlbXAu a28KCkFueXdheSBzeXNjdGwgcyBub3QgZGlzcGxheSB0ZW1wZXJhdHVyZS4KCk15IENQVToKSW50 ZWwoUikgUGVudGl1bShSKSA0IENQVSAxLjRHSHogKDE0MDAuMDktTWh6IDY4Ni1jbGFzcyBDUFUp CgoKCldhaXRpbmcgZm9yIGFuIGFuc3dlciwgdGhhbmtzIGluIGFkdmFuY2UuCkdhbGtpbiBNLiA= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 18:54:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77FA1106566C for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 18:54:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander.kapshuk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49AB8FC08 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 18:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbgg13 with SMTP id gg13so4210870lbb.13 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 11:53:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=8LcceFTEYVeJh22kVQaYongwxhS3W43DAX0Ncmk8cUk=; b=CkWfHovpg1yoaLYVl4ZU6QNoeJlSqpcWV6QPocMHkBJKIQJVYhJTJto4TkY674Hpci bKWOAGpMQz5dQyLnEj5jTguijWZjo24RG5mjpANv44KEV/uoMJoHUFX7SLL4W+VqIAPv PtuZqrd/jdhslv2JtiLVQzTc9lCA6WynBIUvpx0Yxo/HcBOr33cQdTYvSCXkTgXSxIrf LrhPz70LZaqmxu40FW9ebhPQoY3fqaDm6Pt0Q1rG35Wp0TWxg6tPZEn4qbF1vrAsPs+n wucAMkGYKwmzcCBX0tnA8H+pmLbt9u/imQwy1H99ed/Y2t1tpStm8mmwDMd2mXSBtieG gu2g== Received: by 10.112.41.161 with SMTP id g1mr6854891lbl.59.1346784837606; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 11:53:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (93-127-96-97.static.vega-ua.net. [93.127.96.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d1sm4254091lbk.16.2012.09.04.11.53.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 04 Sep 2012 11:53:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <50464E43.3050208@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:53:55 +0300 From: Alexander Kapshuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20120726 Icedove/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Firefox install problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:54:05 -0000 On 09/04/2012 08:11 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: > /bin/mv -f /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/pkgconfig > /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/libdata/ || true > mv: rename /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/pkgconfig to > /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/libdata/pkgconfig: No such file or > directory > /bin/rm -f /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/pkgconfig > This might help... /usr/ports/UPDATING 20120726: AFFECTS: users of devel/pkg-config AUTHOR: bapt@FreeBSD.org devel/pkg-config has been replaced by devel/pkgconf # portmaster -o devel/pkgconf devel/pkg-config or # portupgrade -fo devel/pkgconf pkg-config-\* pkgng: # pkg set -o devel/pkg-config:devel/pkgconf # pkg install -f devel/pkgconf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 19:17:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104A41065673 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:17:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1EF38FC1B for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:17:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q84JHLVm032293; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 13:17:21 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q84JHLn7032290; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 13:17:21 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 13:17:21 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Maxim Galkin In-Reply-To: <1346781877.90463486@f11.mail.ru> Message-ID: References: <1346781877.90463486@f11.mail.ru> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-ID: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 04 Sep 2012 13:17:21 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error with "Coretemp" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 19:17:23 -0000 On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Maxim Galkin wrote: > > Hello, my name is Maxim. Can u help me with my question? > I want to know the temperature of the CPU with the values ??of sysctl. > The command "sysctl-a | grep tempe" ... any results > > I rebuilt the kernel with the remark: > device coretemp > > just trying to add a module with kldload. > > > # kldstat > May 1 0xc0400000 b65944 kernel > February 1 0xc0f66000 22d0 accf_http.ko > March 1 0xc0f69000 30d4 coretemp.ko > > Anyway sysctl s not display temperature. > > My CPU: > Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.4GHz (1400.09-Mhz 686-class CPU) >From coretemp(4): "The coretemp driver provides support for the on-die digital thermal sensor present in Intel Core and newer CPUs." So the Pentium 4 is too old to be supported by that driver. sysutils/mbmon might work. Some P4 systems might not have accessible temperature monitoring. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 18:33:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2211106564A for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 18:33:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brianstivala@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f54.google.com (mail-qa0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1F78FC08 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 18:33:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qatn12 with SMTP id n12so3800257qat.13 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 11:33:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9biicloxzaNdpr90bl4BcQaaWi9SO7Yd0xXK9+6eZ9g=; b=F9vgn6Ncd0imyHBeePDhGYdGwKFcdkBaHQQT8u/w+bPwM5jyEg5aBjF2MVsuav1vQx G9Bk/bKCVibu4AAW89N8okVE9SnfH7Ljr3KB59jDUGugXP2HrBO+//TiuKfOhHXcW3T3 D4lsP5sBHJTtXcK/g49O4SHE56AkIjjAQmUO3092qjBsDv17MIBziq8AGI3U7E4auFCo H8seSYAs6xOsbzwZs3FlSAiDTPbp2XCbwoIdCRxVuHmSW9mZPnaDssCRQ945UAcG9AGl 95iwmymvDohbfzkHmpHoGmgt8Qw8dYhgdhxoOvHbm4zRsffR9C+rjCxYAXw1BWQWZs3Q Qftw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.247.165 with SMTP id yf5mr17684955vec.50.1346783609225; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 11:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.70.101 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 11:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:33:28 +0200 Message-ID: From: Brian Stivala To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=047d7bf0f14e9e018404c8e47ed2 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 19:22:33 +0000 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: FreeBsd modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:33:32 -0000 --047d7bf0f14e9e018404c8e47ed2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I have a watchguard firewall v80 which I=92ve decided to amend it to PFSens= e based on freebsd. So far I=92ve installed PFSense and everything is working accordingly. This firewall has 2x onboard nic cards and a PCI quad nic, as per attached photo. The onboard nics can be recognized however the PCI card is not being recognised, and the strange thing is that both onboard and the PCI uses the same chipset Intel 82559er Ethernet. How can I amend changes in freebsd modules so that the PCI card can be recognised. Usually in other distros modules can be located in /etc/module however I cannot find where the modules are located in freebsd. Can I have some assistance. Regards, Brian Stivala --047d7bf0f14e9e018404c8e47ed2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 19:29:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFDB106566B for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:29:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07D48FC19 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:29:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ialo14 with SMTP id o14so12250624ial.13 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:29:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=bvAYfJwxMhpIs8F/8CgytVGh9YQpHBhLBxBeMBr2nvo=; b=ookHVo8ScFBqW+RJVmw0WtXnidIjleS9p0s9GoNqsy0zgaMgk6T1J35CimanCWQxWr 6j2BJFI8o1PYFi1MTve95IwuaLfalKT3rT/WIhCkiZtZG5P0TJnc6CG+o+Qs4Dk0lGl2 k84KDClgqQk1gt30jtk6Vuz+fJdZ/EvdbwXuKcRgj9PEo9gxrW/Hqz4reiEKCMqUowim bYNbxMJEDnw8D9K7njYF2demWmFSToX5GqTKaQpn/o2/8pd0DEyXmON76WS98wxzaOBk 15P8UsgxjP2D3B0HBzPkpyqrBCSysnjIZch8T/y1RF+Qz5MXDRH/uIKeoo7F4zz2zbnI VmqA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.236.65 with SMTP id us1mr15152948igc.17.1346786953835; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:29:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.131.129 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 12:29:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <50464E43.3050208@gmail.com> References: <50464E43.3050208@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 16:29:13 -0300 Message-ID: From: Mario Lobo To: Alexander Kapshuk X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmbsFbbxtL/Hpu0eEJ3aNuiybuVTzfb86HIu6v2MPMF8RqamT5xhRCD0v4XCRXWBou9QCaO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox install problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 19:29:15 -0000 2012/9/4 Alexander Kapshuk > > This might help... > > /usr/ports/UPDATING > > 20120726: > AFFECTS: users of devel/pkg-config > AUTHOR: bapt@FreeBSD.org > > devel/pkg-config has been replaced by devel/pkgconf > > # portmaster -o devel/pkgconf devel/pkg-config > or > # portupgrade -fo devel/pkgconf pkg-config-\* > > pkgng: > # pkg set -o devel/pkg-config:devel/pkgconf > # pkg install -f devel/pkgconf > Thank Alexander but been there, done that. pkg_info | grep pkg pkgconf-0.8.7 pkg-config compatible utility which does not depend on glib -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 19:35:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E04106564A for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:35:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander.kapshuk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1948FC18 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:35:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lage12 with SMTP id e12so5570962lag.13 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:35:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NMwFnPGeGe5zc+6D9XYGLOg12E3IpevG1WsTFlARe5o=; b=KQH3qTKrojwtcBWdl5Iu9nKUVns4SWdzkLu6u6FxkRo4sFhMGnjuH/fsyZeBWlXYBR huXmpUKqlaQW2G5BUSthcw3bzL55JuHtWZKYbWtdv6mXHhlIKoFxdwokPQ8BdXEG/+V2 2/807KG6TQ3gepXWPAKxgHq34OsuDFiPW24DAmqXATbZRcGzDLYvOtBGC4rmzXpEFnjj bCUjgymfLY2XIayaHMGxRJ3QWFqyF9iyHSEBgfnnRD0odBhVv9Y0MyjHeoifFmZAzBo1 iXvpB34vODYYwQPh/ffe+lWA/D+v6M7slqL+1An9KGafgq6n0G7ipaBoLPvKOdl50hFm BFGQ== Received: by 10.112.31.197 with SMTP id c5mr6894076lbi.50.1346787345546; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:35:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (93-127-96-97.static.vega-ua.net. [93.127.96.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ba4sm4277385lbb.14.2012.09.04.12.35.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:35:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5046580F.8070308@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 22:35:43 +0300 From: Alexander Kapshuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20120726 Icedove/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mario Lobo References: <50464E43.3050208@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox install problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 19:35:47 -0000 On 09/04/2012 10:29 PM, Mario Lobo wrote: > Thank Alexander but been there, done that. > > pkg_info | grep pkg > pkgconf-0.8.7 pkg-config compatible utility which does not depend on glib > Hopefully, somebody else on the list will be of more help than I have been. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 19:51:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0FE1065674 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:51:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (kontrol.kode5.net [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550398FC17 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:51:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q84JpF4B015941 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:51:15 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q84JpFob015940 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:51:15 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) X-Authentication-Warning: kontrol.kode5.net: jamie set sender to jamie@kode5.net using -f Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:51:14 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120904195114.GD12704@kontrol.kode5.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: x-operating-system: FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE amd64 x-pgp-fingerprint: A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38 x-pgp-key: 1D31DC38 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.5 at kontrol.kode5.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: portsnap Generating a "Bad file descriptor" Error Message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 19:51:24 -0000 [ Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote on Tue 4.Sep'12 at 10:14:18 -0400 ] > Hi, > > so I have been having problems using portsnap lately. I always get a "Bad > file descriptor" message when trying using it on one of my i386 machine: > > Looking up portsnap5.freebsd.org mirrors... none found. > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap5.freebsd.org... done. > Fetching snapshot metadata... done. > Fetching snapshot generated at Mon Sep 3 20:04:44 EDT 2012: > 86abb3c6f24b24e7fdadda42805f9ae38f487177dcb949 0% of 67 MB 0 Bps > fetch: > http://portsnap5.freebsd.org/s/86abb3c6f24b24e7fdadda42805f9ae38f487177dcb9493f5e0cb4f792490b2f.tgz: > Bad file descriptor > fetch: > 86abb3c6f24b24e7fdadda42805f9ae38f487177dcb9493f5e0cb4f792490b2f.tgz: Bad > file descriptor > > I tried fsck -y the /var, /tmp and /usr partitions and everything seems > fine. What could the problem be? I'm not getting that error but I am getting these: sort: write failed: standard output: Broken pipe sort: write error Unrelated i'd imagine but seems portsnap has some issues? Jamie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 20:02:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25DD01065781 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:02:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3AF8FC1D for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-49-179.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.49.179]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4E527C1D; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 22:02:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q84K2Psr002064; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 22:02:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 22:02:25 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Warren Block Message-Id: <20120904220225.36a6725d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <1346781877.90463486@f11.mail.ru> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Maxim Galkin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error with "Coretemp" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 20:02:33 -0000 On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 13:17:21 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Maxim Galkin wrote: > > > > > Hello, my name is Maxim. Can u help me with my question? > > I want to know the temperature of the CPU with the values ??of sysctl. > > The command "sysctl-a | grep tempe" ... any results > > > > I rebuilt the kernel with the remark: > > device coretemp > > > > just trying to add a module with kldload. > > > > > > # kldstat > > May 1 0xc0400000 b65944 kernel > > February 1 0xc0f66000 22d0 accf_http.ko > > March 1 0xc0f69000 30d4 coretemp.ko > > > > Anyway sysctl s not display temperature. > > > > My CPU: > > Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.4GHz (1400.09-Mhz 686-class CPU) > > From coretemp(4): > > "The coretemp driver provides support for the on-die digital thermal > sensor present in Intel Core and newer CPUs." > > So the Pentium 4 is too old to be supported by that driver. > sysutils/mbmon might work. Some P4 systems might not have accessible > temperature monitoring. I've successfully been monitoring CPU temp with a Intel Pentium 4 processor on FreeBSD 5 and 7, using xmbmon and some kernel configuration tweaks, such as the inclusion of: device smbus device iicbus device iicsmb device iicbb device iic With xmbmon, temperatures could then be queried. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 20:27:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1D3106564A for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:27:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32A78FC15 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:27:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.local (host86-186-0-200.range86-186.btcentralplus.com [86.186.0.200]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q84KR2Qo084677 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 4 Sep 2012 21:27:03 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q84KR2Qo084677 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q84KR2Qo084677; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host host86-186-0-200.range86-186.btcentralplus.com [86.186.0.200] claimed to be seedling.local Message-ID: <5046640E.10806@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:26:54 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Stivala References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig13A3D197079BD3ED25C80271" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, RDNS_DYNAMIC, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBsd modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 20:27:26 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig13A3D197079BD3ED25C80271 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/09/2012 19:33, Brian Stivala wrote: > I have a watchguard firewall v80 which I=92ve decided to amend it to PF= Sense > based on freebsd. So far I=92ve installed PFSense and everything is wor= king > accordingly. This firewall has 2x onboard nic cards and a PCI quad nic,= as > per attached photo. Unfortunately the list management software ate your photo, but never mind. Your verbal description is sufficient. > The onboard nics can be recognized however the PCI card is not being > recognised, and the strange thing is that both onboard and the PCI uses= the > same chipset Intel 82559er Ethernet. How can I amend changes in freebsd= > modules so that the PCI card can be recognised. There may be a good reason for your quad card not being recognised, or it might just be a bug. If you run: % pciconf -lv You should be able to pick out your unrecognised device. If you ask again on freebsd-net@freebsd.org and include relevant sections from the pciconf output, you should get to the attention of some of the guys that write network drivers. > Usually in other distros modules can be located in /etc/module however = I > cannot find where the modules are located in freebsd. Verb Sap. Calling FreeBSD a 'distro' is definitely non-U. We generally consider penguins a bit fishy round here... If you want to locate the kernel modules for various hardware, look in /boot/kernel. NIC modules will generally have a name beginning 'if_'. If you want to see what modules have been loaded into the kernel, then run: % kldstat There's also 'kldload' and 'kldunload' but they aren't going to help you for this problem. PCI devices are discovered when the kernel probes the bus at boot time: if the kernel hasn't already assigned a driver for the device, then there isn't one available. > Can I have some assistance. Keeps asking good questions and you'll get useful answers. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig13A3D197079BD3ED25C80271 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlBGZBYACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwYiQCglHEgUrnvCrw0RQ1X+uLrw4OR A6gAniCgu9hwNF7QmQOFFpqV6vzXrxQp =MV8I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig13A3D197079BD3ED25C80271-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 4 21:20:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E060106564A for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 21:20:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF098FC16 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 21:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail.dweimer.net [192.168.5.1]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q84LKdRu027857 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 16:20:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 16:20:39 -0500 From: dweimer To: Organization: dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <5046640E.10806@FreeBSD.org> References: <5046640E.10806@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <3b5bbd57669106277ac143b873ede5b4@dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.0 Subject: Re: FreeBsd modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:20:47 -0000 On 2012-09-04 15:26, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 04/09/2012 19:33, Brian Stivala wrote: >> I have a watchguard firewall v80 which I’ve decided to amend it to >> PFSense >> based on freebsd. So far I’ve installed PFSense and everything is >> working >> accordingly. This firewall has 2x onboard nic cards and a PCI quad >> nic, as >> per attached photo. > > Unfortunately the list management software ate your photo, but never > mind. Your verbal description is sufficient. > >> The onboard nics can be recognized however the PCI card is not being >> recognised, and the strange thing is that both onboard and the PCI >> uses the >> same chipset Intel 82559er Ethernet. How can I amend changes in >> freebsd >> modules so that the PCI card can be recognised. > > There may be a good reason for your quad card not being recognised, > or > it might just be a bug. > > If you run: > > % pciconf -lv > > You should be able to pick out your unrecognised device. If you ask > again on freebsd-net@freebsd.org and include relevant sections from > the pciconf output, you should get to the attention of some of the > guys > that write network drivers. > >> Usually in other distros modules can be located in /etc/module >> however I >> cannot find where the modules are located in freebsd. > > Verb Sap. Calling FreeBSD a 'distro' is definitely non-U. We > generally > consider penguins a bit fishy round here... > > If you want to locate the kernel modules for various hardware, look > in > /boot/kernel. NIC modules will generally have a name beginning > 'if_'. > > If you want to see what modules have been loaded into the kernel, > then > run: > > % kldstat > > There's also 'kldload' and 'kldunload' but they aren't going to help > you > for this problem. PCI devices are discovered when the kernel probes > the > bus at boot time: if the kernel hasn't already assigned a driver for > the > device, then there isn't one available. > >> Can I have some assistance. > > Keeps asking good questions and you'll get useful answers. > > Cheers, > > Matthew Definitely do some searching on the pfSense user forums , I run it at home on Alix board, and know I have ran across several threads about using it on watch guard hardware on the forums when looking for hardware alternatives before going with the Alix platform for running pfSense. Someone may have already posted the answer you're looking for there. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 00:52:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1841065670 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 00:52:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lifefornazgul@mail.ru) Received: from fallback2.mail.ru (fallback2.mail.ru [94.100.176.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49A18FC0A for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 00:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from f230.mail.ru (f230.mail.ru [217.69.128.160]) by fallback2.mail.ru (mPOP.Fallback_MX) with ESMTP id 00AECB5BBFD4 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 04:00:36 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ru; s=mail; h=Content-Type:Message-ID:Reply-To:Date:Mime-Version:Subject:To:From; bh=gmY4HM+wTWXOzh8Y8ezAiwDSSojdlahAG4tvMCqF0as=; b=xzok8/IE/dABRedhLGpbPJ179XbhkjC/Xj9sTnpHiKNq7NgOO7L/byddLzGB5qGD4jjW65nlsaIrWigclMqLkSingqSi4W1Cn7D0bQvTXCX6o9+w+AiiBEDKlVIFm+B2; Received: from mail by f230.mail.ru with local (envelope-from ) id 1T932Y-00039Q-Om for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 04:00:18 +0400 Received: from [193.109.166.252] by e.mail.ru with HTTP; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 04:00:18 +0400 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWF4aW0gR2Fsa2lu?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [193.109.166.252] Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 04:00:18 +0400 X-Priority: Message-ID: <1346803218.429230917@f230.mail.ru> X-Spam: Not detected X-Mras: Ok Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Snmpd.conf and own OIDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?UTF-8?B?TWF4aW0gR2Fsa2lu?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:52:32 -0000 Ckd1eXMsIHBsZWFzZSBoZWxwLgpCZWZvcmUgdXMgaXMgYSBjaGFsbGVuZ2UsIHRoZXJlIGlzIGEg c2NyaXB0IHRoYXQgcmFrZSB0aGUgdmFsdWUuIEZ1cnRoZXJtb3JlLCB0aGlzIHZhbHVlIHNob3Vs ZCBiZSBwbGFjZWQgaW4gYW55IE9JRCBvciBjcmVhdGUgeW91ciBvd24gT2JqZWN0IElkZW50aWZp Y2F0b3IgKE9JRCkgZm9yIGV4YW1wbGU6IDEuMy42LmguaC5oLmguaC4gVG8gdGhlbiBnZXQgdGhp cyBPSUQgd2l0aCBzbm1wd2FsayAvIHNubXBnZXQgb24gYSByZW1vdGUgY29tcHV0ZXIuCnJlYWQg YSBsb3Qgb2YgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24sIGJ1dCBoYXZlIG5vdCBmb3VuZCBhIGNvbmNyZXRlIGV4YW1w bGUgLi4uCgpNeSBPUyAiRnJlZUJTRCA5LjAtUkVMRUFTRSAsIG5ldC1zbm1wIDUuNy4xXzcKCgpX cm90ZSBhIGJhc2ggc2NyaXB0IHdoaWNoIGdpdmVzIHRoZSB2YWx1ZSBvZiAiaW50ZWdlciIgIjUu IgpBZGRlZCB0byBzbm1wZC5jb25mCgpleGVjIC4xLjMuNi4xLjQuMS4xOTU4wqAgwqAvIHVzciAv IGxvY2FsIC8gYmluIC8gYmFzaMKgwqDCoMKgwqAgwqAvIGhvbWUgLyB1c2VyIC8gYmluIC8gdGVz dC5zaAoKdGhlbiB0cnkgdG8gZ2V0IHRoZSB2YWx1ZToKCnNubXB3YWxrLXYyYy1jIHB1YmxpYyBs b2NhbGhvc3QgLjEuMy42LjEuNC4xLjE5NTgKCmFuIGVycm9yIHRoYXQgdGhlIE9JRCBpcyBub3Qg Zm91bmQuIHdoYXQgYW0gSSBkb2luZyB3cm9uZz8KU05NUHYyLVNNSSA6OiBlbnRlcnByaXNlcy4x OTU4ID0gTm8gU3VjaCBPYmplY3QgYXZhaWxhYmxlIG9uIHRoaXMgYWdlbnQgYXQgdGhpcyBPSUQK wqAKCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 01:07:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95760106564A for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 01:07:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6106F8FC0A for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 01:07:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.53]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73AA2A710A2 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 21:07:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 17935 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2012 01:07:23 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 9409, pid: 30703, t: 0.1554s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:13495 Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Sep 2012 01:07:23 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E4033C24; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 21:07:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 918163983C; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 21:07:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: "chiehhan" References: <5045b49c.27f1440a.422f.1dc4@mx.google.com> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:07:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5045b49c.27f1440a.422f.1dc4@mx.google.com> (chiehhan@gmail.com's message of "Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:58:15 +0800") Message-ID: <44y5kps2f0.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: asking for help about "acpi_tz0: _CRT value is absurd, ignored (256.0C) " X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 01:07:25 -0000 "chiehhan" writes: > To whom may concern, > > I am a greenhorn in the field of freebsd.And when I install Freebsd9.0 on my laptop HP NX6330,a control spam "acpi_tz0: _CRT value is absurd, ignored (256.0C)"occurs. > > I learned some reference about sysctl and revised the configure file sysctl.conf,adding two lines below into sysctl.conf: > hw.acpi.thermal.user_override=1 > hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._CRT=110.0C > but the control spam remains. > > I read the source code about acpi_thermal.c,but still have no idea about how to solve this problem.I am a little desperated and turn freebsd-questions@freebsd.org for help.Would you please send me a solution? A solution to what problem? The "ignored" message isn't a problem on its own; do you think it causing some other trouble that you didn't describe? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 01:14:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179FA106566C for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 01:14:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96DA8FC1C for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 01:14:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.49]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452C3A711E3 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 21:14:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 954 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2012 01:14:12 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 30102, pid: 26602, t: 0.2075s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Sep 2012 01:14:12 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228F533C24; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 21:14:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 431973983C; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 21:14:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Mario Lobo References: Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:14:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Mario Lobo's message of "Tue, 4 Sep 2012 14:11:23 -0300") Message-ID: <44txvds23l.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox install problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 01:14:14 -0000 Mario Lobo writes: > env: > FBSD 8.3-STABLE AMD64 > Firefox 15 port > > The problem seems to be with the porting itself. > > The first problem showed up during configure. Libvpx could not be found and > configure stops. > After examining Config.Log, I found a compiler switch like this: > > -L/usr/local/lib/nss > > I made a symlink there to libvpx.so and the port compiled without errors. That's an incredibly ugly solution; if the vpx port were installed correctly, it would have been detected, so you're probably just hiding a real problem. > Then after issuing a make install, this comes up everytime: > > [Snip] > a ./searchplugins/yahoo.xml > a ./dictionaries/en-US.aff > a ./dictionaries/en-US.dic > a ./defaults/pref > a ./defaults/pref/channel-prefs.js > a ./chrome/icons > a ./chrome/icons/default > a ./chrome/icons/default/default16.png > a ./chrome/icons/default/default32.png > a ./chrome/icons/default/default48.png > /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/config/nsinstall -D > /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/bin > rm -f -f /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/bin/firefox > ln -s /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/firefox/firefox > /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/bin > gmake[1]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/browser/installer' > echo 'share/applications/firefox.desktop' >> > /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/plist_files > echo "@dirrmtry share/applications" >> > /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/plist_dirs > echo 'share/pixmaps/firefox.png' >> /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/plist_files > /bin/mkdir -p /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/libdata > /bin/mv -f /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/pkgconfig > /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/libdata/ || true > mv: rename /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/pkgconfig to > /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/libdata/pkgconfig: No such file or > directory > /bin/rm -f /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/pkgconfig > cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/include > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. > > All the fixes I googled that could relate to this, date back to 2005 the > latest,, and none of them helped. > > I've been trying to fix this for 2 days now and I'm not getting anywhere so > I can only hope someone can shed a light on this problem here on the list.. > > My sincere thanks to whoever points me a direction. You've done something really weird (in particular, the "work/fake" directory would not exist or be referenced in a normal ports installation). Try emptying your /etc/make.conf and starting from scratch. Good luck. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 01:37:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74256106564A for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 01:37:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EDC88FC0C for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 01:37:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q851be8O035062; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:37:40 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q851behA035059; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:37:40 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:37:40 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <44y5kps2f0.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Message-ID: References: <5045b49c.27f1440a.422f.1dc4@mx.google.com> <44y5kps2f0.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 04 Sep 2012 19:37:40 -0600 (MDT) Cc: chiehhan Subject: Re: asking for help about "acpi_tz0: _CRT value is absurd, ignored (256.0C) " X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 01:37:41 -0000 On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > "chiehhan" writes: > >> To whom may concern, >> >> I am a greenhorn in the field of freebsd.And when I install Freebsd9.0 on my laptop HP NX6330,a control spam "acpi_tz0: _CRT value is absurd, ignored (256.0C)"occurs. >> >> I learned some reference about sysctl and revised the configure file sysctl.conf,adding two lines below into sysctl.conf: >> hw.acpi.thermal.user_override=1 >> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._CRT=110.0C >> but the control spam remains. >> >> I read the source code about acpi_thermal.c,but still have no idea about how to solve this problem.I am a little desperated and turn freebsd-questions@freebsd.org for help.Would you please send me a solution? > > A solution to what problem? The "ignored" message isn't a problem on its > own; do you think it causing some other trouble that you didn't describe? I have a similar HP system. That message is logged a couple of times a minute, hiding other messages in the logs and making them roll over quickly. That particular system is a Pentium D which wasn't really worth much effort, but it would still be nice to see this annoyance fixed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 01:46:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9460D106566B for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 01:46:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chiehhan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616F78FC0A for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 01:46:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so103313pbb.13 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:46:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :x-priority:mime-version:content-type; bh=r9r1973WhY1mFurVVqr8g8GOp3REU9ubJ+mdWM7Qm+w=; b=sx/P+oMnaukYO16QuOLJxBaWbYl6k7f2zHfXxcDQd5/pMC/Z91QXciUh8dWFbwCXlX enqITAsHoejnUvcJBewU1E6BBuPKxiijOu/4ECHU8EcMrhcpncxGtenPaUf3ELsa5nSG N+HAvlLv1zVs/Pu0onaJ7cs2NyZCWlQKKr0pwMcAAF4719ZMh54fGpfupgDvs4pni9yR 1zGm+FgNnELo8b9HYrvmK2ZE+GpqYKYpYnUGnhfRLNop3UbwQrs91uS1ghLsWooKunS+ N39N5oaTF3VsN8WmDTxZ9LlzhbBwS68dD/LhwYfFJ05v+u0IKYFXVxggnRsj0OopNOsM P8cQ== Received: by 10.68.223.133 with SMTP id qu5mr12759355pbc.104.1346809574926; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:46:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gha-PC ([117.136.11.93]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ty1sm237701pbc.76.2012.09.04.18.46.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:46:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5046aee5.c1e9440a.173e.139a@mx.google.com> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:46:11 +0800 From: "chiehhan" To: "freebsd-questions" In-Reply-To: <44y5kps2f0.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <5045b49c.27f1440a.422f.1dc4@mx.google.com> <44y5kps2f0.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> X-Mailer: NetEase Flash Mail 2.2.1.16 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: =?utf-8?b?5Zue5aSNOiAgUmU6IGFza2luZyBmb3IgaGVscCBhYm91dCAiYWNw?= =?utf-8?q?i=5Ftz0=3A_=5FCRT_value_is_absurd=2C_ignored_=28256=2E0C?= =?utf-8?b?KSAi?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 01:46:15 -0000 aGksR2lsYmVydA0KVGhhbmtzIGZvciB5b3VyIHJlcGx5LlRoZSBtZXNzYWdlICJhY3BpX3R6MDog X0NSVCB2YWx1ZSBpcyBhYnN1cmQsIGlnbm9yZWQgKDI1Ni4wQykiIHdhcyBwcmludGVkIG9uIG15 IHNjcmVlbiB3aGVuIEkgaW5zdGFsbCBGUkVFQlNEOS4wLkFuZCB0aGUgbWVzc2FnZSBhcHBlYXJz IGZyb20gdGltZSB0byB0aW1lIHdoZW4gSSB1c2VkIG15IGxhcHRvcC5Bbm5veWluZ35+fn4NCg0K VW50aWwgbm93LEkgZG8gbm90IG5vdGljZSBhbnkgcHJvYmxlbSBjYXN1c2VkIGJ5IHRoZSBtZXNz YWdlIG9idmlvdXNseS4gSSByZWFkIHRoZSBzb3VyY2UgY29kZSBvZiB0aGUgYWNwaV90aGVybWFs LmMsYnV0IGhhdmUgbm8gaWRlYSBhYm91dCB3aGF0IHRlbXBlcmF0dXJlIHRoZSBhY3BpX3R6MCBk ZXRlY3RlZC5UaGUgbWVzc2FnZSB0ZWxsIG1lIF9DUlQgdmFsdWUgaXMgYWJzdXJkLGhvdyB0byBt YWtlIGl0IHJlYXNvbmFibGUgYW5kIG5vdCBhcHBlYXJzIGZyb20gdGltZSB0byB0aW1lIG9uIG15 IHNjcmVlbj9UaGFua3MgZm9yIHlvdXIga2luZG5lc3MuDQoNCnBzOkkgaW5zdGFsbCBmcmVlYnNk OS4wIHRvIG90aGVyIG1hY2hpbmUsdGhpcyBtZXNzYWdlIGRvZXMgbm90IGFwcGVhcnMuDQoNCg0K MjAxMi0wOS0wNQ0KDQoNCg0KY2hpZWhoYW4NCg0KDQoNCuWPkeS7tuS6uu+8mkxvd2VsbCBHaWxi ZXJ0DQrlj5HpgIHml7bpl7TvvJoyMDEyLTA5LTA1IDA5OjA3DQrkuLvpopjvvJpSZTogYXNraW5n IGZvciBoZWxwIGFib3V0ICJhY3BpX3R6MDogX0NSVCB2YWx1ZSBpcyBhYnN1cmQsIGlnbm9yZWQg KDI1Ni4wQykgIg0K5pS25Lu25Lq677yaImNoaWVoaGFuIjxjaGllaGhhbkBnbWFpbC5jb20+DQrm ioTpgIHvvJoiZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnMiPGZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zQGZyZWVic2Qub3Jn Pg0KDQoiY2hpZWhoYW4iIDxjaGllaGhhbkBnbWFpbC5jb20+IHdyaXRlczogDQoNCj4gVG8gd2hv bSBtYXkgY29uY2VybiwgDQo+IA0KPiBJIGFtIGEgZ3JlZW5ob3JuIGluIHRoZSBmaWVsZCBvZiBm cmVlYnNkLkFuZCB3aGVuIEkgaW5zdGFsbCBGcmVlYnNkOS4wIG9uIG15IGxhcHRvcCBIUCBOWDYz MzAsYSBjb250cm9sIHNwYW0gImFjcGlfdHowOiBfQ1JUIHZhbHVlIGlzIGFic3VyZCwgaWdub3Jl ZCAoMjU2LjBDKSJvY2N1cnMuIA0KPiANCj4gSSBsZWFybmVkIHNvbWUgcmVmZXJlbmNlIGFib3V0 IHN5c2N0bCBhbmQgcmV2aXNlZCB0aGUgY29uZmlndXJlIGZpbGUgc3lzY3RsLmNvbmYsYWRkaW5n IHR3byBsaW5lcyBiZWxvdyBpbnRvIHN5c2N0bC5jb25mOiANCj4gaHcuYWNwaS50aGVybWFsLnVz ZXJfb3ZlcnJpZGU9MSAgDQo+IGh3LmFjcGkudGhlcm1hbC50ejAuX0NSVD0xMTAuMEMgIA0KPiBi dXQgdGhlIGNvbnRyb2wgc3BhbSByZW1haW5zLiANCj4gDQo+IEkgcmVhZCB0aGUgc291cmNlIGNv ZGUgYWJvdXQgYWNwaV90aGVybWFsLmMsYnV0IHN0aWxsIGhhdmUgbm8gaWRlYSBhYm91dCBob3cg dG8gc29sdmUgdGhpcyBwcm9ibGVtLkkgYW0gYSBsaXR0bGUgZGVzcGVyYXRlZCBhbmQgdHVybiBm cmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9uc0BmcmVlYnNkLm9yZyBmb3IgaGVscC5Xb3VsZCB5b3UgcGxlYXNlIHNl bmQgbWUgYSBzb2x1dGlvbj8gIA0KDQpBIHNvbHV0aW9uIHRvIHdoYXQgcHJvYmxlbT8gVGhlICJp Z25vcmVkIiBtZXNzYWdlIGlzbid0IGEgcHJvYmxlbSBvbiBpdHMgDQpvd247IGRvIHlvdSB0aGlu ayBpdCBjYXVzaW5nIHNvbWUgb3RoZXIgdHJvdWJsZSB0aGF0IHlvdSBkaWRuJ3QgZGVzY3JpYmU/ IA== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 02:02:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA722106564A for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 02:02:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-qa0-f47.google.com (mail-qa0-f47.google.com [209.85.216.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7A68FC12 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 02:02:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qadc11 with SMTP id c11so4503784qad.13 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 19:02:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=/pPTxn9uZdzM1TTcgVHNlk1j/87lkvxgRPe6G6A2QLw=; b=XX5LrH5HyOEmCNXcC8Xh/5Wawj+HGDKXYTPJX2iMHiiLtZ9qG5MvOqcM1a78xhvGAf ciNqugRVirepJtJCulnrUyT7vU9nqxfHPBWRTL5yYJO+5FyR7nLxEtebS/1O2RS/WxwM 1zvcMf1rLFdNwZJpksEEKUfsOPhKEI8IMndplovrylDxc8HEcKPeQJKBODfSNg3MavPa EalLia66yPRM4HcySgRn+13ZokZKnKrsG0w1kFDoX7dv5f5vflgk60ETKk6T382kDz9e mZttDkR+qsMpCLJ8PPxXTI5Or7P3OSlpNWu8RmKG+1TVIzi94z8VDaLSDBsS4opQbHjq e4dA== Received: by 10.229.136.140 with SMTP id r12mr8825688qct.39.1346810530473; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 19:02:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from papi ([177.41.9.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ha5sm294997qab.1.2012.09.04.19.02.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 04 Sep 2012 19:02:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 23:03:05 -0300 From: Mario Lobo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120904230305.46a318b6@papi> In-Reply-To: <44txvds23l.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <44txvds23l.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Organization: BSD X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQltPZiYfdf4VU9/lUdcSDEHar2C/SQXzJNQdFCwqKDw+z645eqxlEC6I0e+x6RPziNFP272 Subject: Re: Firefox install problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 02:02:11 -0000 First, thanks for replying ! On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:14:06 -0400 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Mario Lobo writes: > > > env: > > FBSD 8.3-STABLE AMD64 > > Firefox 15 port > > > > The problem seems to be with the porting itself. > > > > The first problem showed up during configure. Libvpx could not be > > found and configure stops. > > After examining Config.Log, I found a compiler switch like this: > > > > -L/usr/local/lib/nss > > > > I made a symlink there to libvpx.so and the port compiled without > > errors. > > That's an incredibly ugly solution; I can't disagree with that! but hey, the problem was getting to compile correctly and, in the absence of the right knowledge and the presence of need, that did it. > if the vpx port were installed > correctly, it would have been detected, so you're probably just > hiding a real problem. > The problem is libvpx.so is CORRECTLY installed under /usr/local/lib/vpx, together with all the other correctly installed libraries on my system so most certainly there is something uglier than my hack here. > > Then after issuing a make install, this comes up everytime: > > > > [Snip] > > a ./searchplugins/yahoo.xml > > a ./dictionaries/en-US.aff > > a ./dictionaries/en-US.dic > > a ./defaults/pref > > a ./defaults/pref/channel-prefs.js > > a ./chrome/icons > > a ./chrome/icons/default > > a ./chrome/icons/default/default16.png > > a ./chrome/icons/default/default32.png > > /bin/rm -f /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/pkgconfig > > cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/include > > *** Error code 2 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. > > > > You've done something really weird (in particular, the "work/fake" > directory would not exist or be referenced in a normal ports > installation). Try emptying your /etc/make.conf and starting from > scratch. All I've done was "csup -L 2 ports-supfile" with ports-www in it. Then cd /usr/ports/www/firefox; make with default options. As for my /etc/make.conf CPUTYPE?=nocona OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f10 OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f10 WITH_KDE4=yes WITH_CUPS=yes WITH_ICONS=KDE4 WITHOUT_GNOME=yes PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION=python2.7 PERL_VERSION=5.10.4 If it is its fault, it will be the first time in around 3,5 years. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 02:06:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C18106566C for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 02:06:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7248FC0A for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 02:06:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 28537290 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:06:37 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8526bLn038941 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 09:06:37 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q8526aOQ038940 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 09:06:36 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 09:06:36 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120905020636.GA38610@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20120903030217.GA79339@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <86wr0binyc.fsf@srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org> <20120903072920.GB92658@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20120903125210.GA5387@external.screwed.box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120903125210.GA5387@external.screwed.box> Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: Sharing COM ports to Windows hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 02:06:46 -0000 Peter Vereshagin wrote: > Depending on a task I think the most interactive user-friendly solution here is > a minicom(s) each in its own ssh'ed jail(s). There is special Windows software for managing Natex MUXes. It works with those MUXes via an RS232 port only. I want to be able to run it from a remote location. Solution 1. A hardware RS232 portserver (e.g. Moxa) and a special Windows driver for COM-port redirection. Works great. Disadvantage: it's pretty expensive and occupies additional rack space. Solution 2. Using an existing networked FreeBSD box sitting next to the MUX, it already has COM ports. Advantage: cheap, no additional rack space and power. Disadvantage: doubts if this solution is feasible, especially on the Windows side. A minicom or any other interactive terminal emulation software is out of the question. The MUX managing software uses its own protocol over RS323 and insists that it be a "real" port. Perhaps my English is so poor that I could not present the task correctly from the very beginning. Sorry for that. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 02:15:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7EF106564A for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 02:15:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6AE8FC12 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 02:15:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 28537383 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:15:17 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q852FHKX039155 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 09:15:17 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q852FGGL039154 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 09:15:16 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 09:15:16 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120905021516.GB38610@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20120903030217.GA79339@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <50443766.4020705@boosten.org> <5044b978.qFhU35CVsU8J/nET%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20120903072449.GA92658@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <50458b26.tmHtgZn7IH/7r2In%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50458b26.tmHtgZn7IH/7r2In%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: Sharing COM ports to Windows hosts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 02:15:20 -0000 perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > > In fact, the question is whether there is a standards compliant > > (not written for some proprietary hardware terminal server > > protocol) driver for Windows. Not exactly a FreeBSD question, > > I know :) > > Finding a Windows driver that will work with an existing FreeBSD > program is certainly one possible approach. Another, which > I understood to be the intent of the original inquiry, is finding > a FreeBSD solution that will work with an existing Windows driver. I am fine with that too. Whatever works. > There's surely no reason why a FreeBSD system _can't_ support > a protocol originally developed by a hardware terminal server > manufacturer, as vpnc does for the Cisco VPN protocol. Actually, that was the reason of my question here: perhaps someone has already found a matching pair (freeware if possible). Two commercial solutions have already been named: NetDialout from PCMicro and DialOut/EZ COM Port Redirector from Tactical Software. Eric has mentioned com0com, but I have not been able to make it work (I am not much of a Windows guy, and this software is a good example of Windows hacking, in the good sense of the word, but still, I cannot figure out how to create the configuration described in the README file, some components seem missing). -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 02:18:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22CA106566C for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 02:18:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gobble.wa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FCB08FC15 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 02:18:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so1582wgb.31 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 19:18:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/P6gBzol0g75hYDyMBQghh/xbe32+5TaKIfwk1L9sms=; b=yEZJLo/oSPtvKO6642XkERgwOzi+p+Fq0+RMaK+i2FD3BSbwB1HoiF56srrwoKgOPs a8aN/BJM9bhIWxJOU3U+stOuczu8UIyUdq6HuOIUqXi6bcTcz0VWnwwf9extF0KNAFSo WEp03TxoAAF5eIq6UeSUeZzWauoO6NniJ95m5ZoMHUdgcs8UOFfoZFRBPi2BqD85nlvD yQmaAZ5qUevgz+JIOgXFgicX3yV7zl/4cDCAkTfxG2YMZ90ChhaGcKZqBVe7FVCxSk9g Ft1VHJpG/pYCBD5mecxyghg1WMst7BvDSN0Zixfwss9NaGqIAKjnDrq1bCL1N6hVIqP4 +XjQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.241.198 with SMTP id g48mr13490588wer.153.1346811532183; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 19:18:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.190.153 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.190.153 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:18:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120904230305.46a318b6@papi> References: <44txvds23l.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20120904230305.46a318b6@papi> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:18:51 -0700 Message-ID: From: Waitman Gobble To: Mario Lobo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox install problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 02:18:54 -0000 On Sep 4, 2012 7:03 PM, "Mario Lobo" wrote: > > First, thanks for replying ! > > On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:14:06 -0400 > Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > > Mario Lobo writes: > > > > > env: > > > FBSD 8.3-STABLE AMD64 > > > Firefox 15 port > > > > > > The problem seems to be with the porting itself. > > > > > > The first problem showed up during configure. Libvpx could not be > > > found and configure stops. > > > After examining Config.Log, I found a compiler switch like this: > > > > > > -L/usr/local/lib/nss > > > > > > I made a symlink there to libvpx.so and the port compiled without > > > errors. > > > > That's an incredibly ugly solution; > > I can't disagree with that! but hey, the problem was getting to compile > correctly and, in the absence of the right knowledge and the presence > of need, that did it. > > > if the vpx port were installed > > correctly, it would have been detected, so you're probably just > > hiding a real problem. > > > > The problem is libvpx.so is CORRECTLY installed > under /usr/local/lib/vpx, together with all the other correctly > installed libraries on my system so most certainly there is something > uglier than my hack here. > > > > > Then after issuing a make install, this comes up everytime: > > > > > > [Snip] > > > a ./searchplugins/yahoo.xml > > > a ./dictionaries/en-US.aff > > > a ./dictionaries/en-US.dic > > > a ./defaults/pref > > > a ./defaults/pref/channel-prefs.js > > > a ./chrome/icons > > > a ./chrome/icons/default > > > a ./chrome/icons/default/default16.png > > > a ./chrome/icons/default/default32.png > > > /bin/rm -f /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib/pkgconfig > > > cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/include > > > *** Error code 2 > > > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. > > > > > > > You've done something really weird (in particular, the "work/fake" > > directory would not exist or be referenced in a normal ports > > installation). Try emptying your /etc/make.conf and starting from > > scratch. > > All I've done was "csup -L 2 ports-supfile" with ports-www in it. > Then cd /usr/ports/www/firefox; make with default options. > > As for my /etc/make.conf > > CPUTYPE?=nocona > OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f10 > OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f10 > WITH_KDE4=yes > WITH_CUPS=yes > WITH_ICONS=KDE4 > WITHOUT_GNOME=yes > PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION=python2.7 > PERL_VERSION=5.10.4 > > If it is its fault, it will be the first time in around 3,5 years. > > -- > Mario Lobo > http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br > FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" hi, did you _only_ csup www in ports? ill have to check but im not sure libvpx is in www... im not in a place to check at this exact second but my memory is that is providing webm support so probably in audio or multimedia Waitman Gobble San Jose California From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 02:39:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9092C106566C for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 02:39:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1EF8FC0C for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 02:39:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q852dgip035633; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:39:42 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q852dfHf035630; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:39:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:39:41 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Waitman Gobble In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <44txvds23l.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20120904230305.46a318b6@papi> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 04 Sep 2012 20:39:42 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Mario Lobo , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox install problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 02:39:44 -0000 On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote: > On Sep 4, 2012 7:03 PM, "Mario Lobo" wrote: >> >> All I've done was "csup -L 2 ports-supfile" with ports-www in it. >> Then cd /usr/ports/www/firefox; make with default options. >> >> As for my /etc/make.conf >> >> CPUTYPE?=nocona >> OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f10 >> OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f10 >> WITH_KDE4=yes >> WITH_CUPS=yes >> WITH_ICONS=KDE4 >> WITHOUT_GNOME=yes >> PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION=python2.7 >> PERL_VERSION=5.10.4 >> >> If it is its fault, it will be the first time in around 3,5 years. > > did you _only_ csup www in ports? ill have to check but im not sure libvpx > is in www... im not in a place to check at this exact second but my memory > is that is providing webm support so probably in audio or multimedia multimedia/libvpx would not have been updated. Selectively updating ports is not supported. Symlinking libraries to missing versions is often a source of mysterious problems later. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 07:38:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED99106566C for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 07:38:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from semiservers@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C158FC14 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 07:38:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so506593pbb.13 for ; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:38:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=T4gGRxERgrTDbH6QTMrQQWQwyDOOaP7AncMy+SKw5AE=; b=dvQejjJ63aufjNHFOpgr0waFsVCGf2mleQrl1E9DtjEHpHKwZWUSWtbmjGOpO6vF/D A8jzlBPf65oRw++xrVUTNCYz8RGy1vYe874wcw3ewLXb0u5jY3TpUoctwPEFsrR83G6I iBlRzlEKaZLXDlSRflORYf4XTaB7kcWH3DZkvgTklpRrCvtlH2stgtRLKGulS51dKajr CyY6gir96RQSsRgLH3fuIti+SItB4y+sBcc30ttAMsicR1vg1N1k/HVtgEtKZzwliPTd C01YWHKjjQq9D8FdJF6HxLjfVNEWOHa4fVARd9j3UJHlfP3pF2PovnUru5alRxdOB0Ui Xuww== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.75.201 with SMTP id e9mr46902702paw.54.1346830730756; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:38:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.15.136 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 00:38:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:38:50 +0500 Message-ID: From: semi servers To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Unlimited Master Reseller Hosting now in just 30$/year X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 07:38:51 -0000 *Unlimited Reseller Hosting now in just 20$/year* *Discount Coupon: LETS20* *http://wbestoffer.wordpress.com* *Reseller Hosting * Would you like to start a web hosting company, or take your current hosting business to the next level? Our reseller hosting account puts YOU in control! With *WebHostMaker* you can sell unlimited plans to your customers and we also enable overselling! You will have your own FREE private name servers (ns1.yourdomain.com & ns2.yourdomain.com) that will build and solidify your brand. ** *Reseller Packages* *Basic* $3.99 per month *Host Unlimited* Domains *100 GB* Storage *1000 GB* Bandwidth *Unlimited* Email Accounts *Unlimited* FTP Accounts *Unlimited* Databases *RvSitebuilder Pro* *Softaculous* PHP, CGI, Perl, MySQL, PostgreSQL, Ruby on Rails (RoR), Ion cube, Zend Optimizer, Cron Jobs, GD Library, ImageMagick, Awstats etc... Sign Up Now * * *Pro* $4.99 per month *Host Unlimited* Domains *300 GB* Storage *3000 GB* Bandwidth *Unlimited* Email Accounts *Unlimited* FTP Accounts *Unlimited* Databases *RvSitebuilder Pro* *Softaculous* Sign Up Now * * *Enterprise* $5.99 per month *Host Unlimited* Domains *Unlimited GB* Storage *Unlimited GB* Bandwidth *Unlimited* Email Accounts *Unlimited* FTP Accounts *Unlimited* Databases *RvSitebuilder Pro* *Softaculous* Sign Up Now *Unlimited Master Reseller Hosting now in just 30$/year* *Discount Coupon: LETS30 * Master Reseller Hosting As a Master Reseller host you=92re at the top of the food chain! You will b= e able to sell both WHM Reseller accounts and cPanel accounts! With us you can sell unlimited plans to your customers and we also enable overselling! You will also have your own FREE private name servers (ns1.yourdomain.com & ns2.yourdomain.com) that will build and solidify your brand *Master Reseller Packages* *Basic* $7.99 per month *Host Unlimited* Domains + 10 WHM Accounts / 10 Sub Resellers *100 GB* Storage *1000 GB* Bandwidth *Unlimited* Email Accounts *Unlimited* FTP Accounts *Unlimited* Databases *RvSitebuilder Pro* *Softaculous* Sign Up Now * * *Pro* $8.99 per month *Host Unlimited* Domains + 30 WHM Accounts / 30 Sub Resellers *300 GB* Storage *3000 GB* Bandwidth *Unlimited* Email Accounts *Unlimited* FTP Accounts *Unlimited* Databases *RvSitebuilder Pro* *Softaculous* Sign Up Now *Enterprise* $9.99 per month *Host Unlimited* Domains + Unlimited WHM / Unlimited Sub Resellers *Unlimited GB* Storage *Unlimited GB* Bandwidth *Unlimited* Email Accounts *Unlimited* FTP Accounts *Unlimited* Databases *RvSitebuilder Pro* *Softaculous* Sign Up Now *Unlimited Alpha Reseller Hosting now in just 40$/year* *Discount Coupon: LETS40 * Alpha Reseller Hosting As an Alpha Reseller host you=92re in control! With Alpha Reseller you will be able to sell Master Reseller accounts, WHM Reseller accounts and cPanel hosting accounts! With us you can sell unlimited plans to your customers and we also enable overselling! You will also have your own FREE private name servers (ns1.yourdomain.com & ns2.yourdomain.com) that will build and solidify your brand. You will be hosted on WebHostMaker=92s powerful dedicated servers that have eight (4-8) CPUs, 8-12 GB RAM each, and are located at the Serverloft and other large, established United States & Europ datacenters. *Alpha Reseller Packages* *Basic* $11.99 per month *Host Unlimited* Domains/ 10 Master Reseller / 10 Sub Resellers *Unlimited GB* Storage *Unlimited GB* Bandwidth *Unlimited* Email Accounts *Unlimited* FTP Accounts *Unlimited* Databases *RvSitebuilder Pro* *Softaculous* Sign Up Now * * *Pro* $13.99 per month *Host Unlimited* Domains/ 30 Master Reseller / 30 Sub Resellers *Unlimited GB* Storage *Unlimited GB* Bandwidth *Unlimited* Email Accounts *Unlimited* FTP Accounts *Unlimited* Databases *RvSitebuilder Pro* *Softaculous* Sign Up Now * * *Enterprise* $15.99 per month *Host Unlimited* Domains/ Unlimited Master Reseller / Unlimited Sub Resellers *Unlimited GB* Storage *Unlimited GB* Bandwidth *Unlimited* Email Accounts *Unlimited* FTP Accounts *Unlimited* Databases *RvSitebuilder Pro* *Softaculous* Sign Up Now *http://wbestoffer.wordpress.com* --=20 ***Disclaimer: This email is sent out in accordance with the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. You can opt out by sending mail to **semiservers@gmail.com **with 'Remove' in the subject line and we ensure you will not receive any such mails in future.* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 11:26:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF48106564A for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 11:26:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3078FC14 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 11:25:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iayy25 with SMTP id y25so837605iay.13 for ; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 04:25:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=iDvLQezMhenHo+3EoZuAVdFCcCwe+S+ys6T2jNrfL7k=; b=VnOWVKYiH0f3ABdUZ8WwumMxc7R3fGQhkSrzt7bbr5YluRJA+jppgOhhn6wFxAdyfz 31Kv+vgAfPpH88ll4EustFDupFeEo+yMmk8APsLjYLE/z9ErRXLJhg7amMjbFxrK8O60 NAyd1WELBW3+PeiDyGaOEtgKqlcYpMHHVnu45558/R2aNHd7Rz5mCVQs7tQhRFweATId 8TBTsVLKwihBpynsoxd4FU6zNTdFUleXFRRMRJ/p1FrUP11+DAKdpjeW3DnShfESkO3A 1Y6P3VfpbvZCuD19j/qF7Y5Q6RAnFpiYdOKveU1lxc5EXMDhoPiHhA96OXclQzpgr1Pn 9Ssw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.177.7 with SMTP id cm7mr16712874obc.17.1346844357601; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 04:25:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.0.194 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 04:25:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <44txvds23l.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20120904230305.46a318b6@papi> Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 08:25:57 -0300 Message-ID: From: Mario Lobo To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlK7mv50PB2Ncif3MZF8aV0AWT4g6JWWekPLut+qyuMsFJghlHgnuGx7LxyqVoOrVHD6zqt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Firefox install problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 11:26:02 -0000 2012/9/4 Warren Block > On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > On Sep 4, 2012 7:03 PM, "Mario Lobo" wrote: >> >>> >>> All I've done was "csup -L 2 ports-supfile" with ports-www in it. >>> Then cd /usr/ports/www/firefox; make with default options. >>> >>> As for my /etc/make.conf >>> >>> CPUTYPE?=nocona >>> OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f10 >>> OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f10 >>> WITH_KDE4=yes >>> WITH_CUPS=yes >>> WITH_ICONS=KDE4 >>> WITHOUT_GNOME=yes >>> PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION=python2.7 >>> PERL_VERSION=5.10.4 >>> >>> If it is its fault, it will be the first time in around 3,5 years. >>> >> >> did you _only_ csup www in ports? ill have to check but im not sure >> libvpx >> is in www... im not in a place to check at this exact second but my memory >> is that is providing webm support so probably in audio or multimedia >> > > multimedia/libvpx would not have been updated. Selectively updating ports > is not supported. Symlinking libraries to missing versions is often a > source of mysterious problems later. > I had run csup with ports-multimedia since the first libvpx error came up!. Libvpx was already up to date by the way, and correctly installed. So i did not Symlink a library to any "missing version". "Selectively updating ports is not supported". Then I must wonder why do we have the option to put "ports-{$port}" inside the supfile, and not a mandatory ports-all. @Jan ~]>ident /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk: $FreeBSD: ports/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk,v 1.63 2012/07/26 23:12:19 flo Exp $ As far as I could find, this seems to be the latest version. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 12:25:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C241065689 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:25:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B1F8FC24 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:25:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-49-179.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.49.179]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 336E33D980; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 14:19:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q85CJu46002108; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 14:19:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 14:19:56 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Mario Lobo Message-Id: <20120905141956.1fdd0113.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <44txvds23l.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20120904230305.46a318b6@papi> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox install problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:25:41 -0000 On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 08:25:57 -0300, Mario Lobo wrote: > "Selectively updating ports is not supported". Then I must wonder why do > we have the option to put "ports-{$port}" inside the supfile, and not a > mandatory ports-all. The reason is that you can safely ignore port categories for languages and topics you're intendedly not going to use. I'm using this approach here myself, but I include categories that _might_ contain components that are dependencies for other (more obvious) dependencies or programs. So for example, if you omit ports-german, you should be fine if you're not installing anything for that language. This kind of selection is easy. Avoiding other categories can be problematic when a "less obvious" dependency is requested from such a category, e. g. a library in ports-astronomy for some dependency for a library used in a component of a some gadget for the KDE desktop. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 14:26:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5CDE1065675 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 14:26:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from x.it.okstate.edu (x.it.okstate.edu [139.78.2.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3FD28FC08 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 14:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by x.it.okstate.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q85EQ2pl050337 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 09:26:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <201209051426.q85EQ2pl050337@x.it.okstate.edu> To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:26:02 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Cc: Subject: Virtual FreeBSD9.0 ISO Image Won't Mount Root FS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 14:26:09 -0000 The ISO image is the FreeBSD9.0 bootonly CDROM for amd64 systems. I added loader.conf to /boot in order to activate a serial console and this along with socat appears to be working as it should. This is great because remote desktop is not an option. The VM boot starts normally with the spinning bars and normal startup messages until: cd0: cd present [85585 x 2048 byte records] Timecounter "TSC" frequency 3368628976 Hz quality 800 Trying to mount root from cd9660:/dev/iso9660/FREEBSD_INSTALL [ro]... mountroot: waiting for device /dev/iso9660/FREEBSD_INSTALL ... Mounting from cd9660:/dev/iso9660/FREEBSD_INSTALL failed with error 19. Loader variables: vfs.root.mountfrom=cd9660:/dev/iso9660/FREEBSD_INSTALL vfs.root.mountfrom.options=ro Manual root filesystem specification: : [options] Mount using filesystem and with the specified (optional) option list. eg. ufs:/dev/da0s1a zfs:tank cd9660:/dev/acd0 ro (which is equivalent to: mount -t cd9660 -o ro /dev/acd0 /) ? List valid disk boot devices . Yield 1 second (for background tasks) Abort manual input mountroot> I enter a Question Mark. mountroot> ? List of GEOM managed disk devices: iso9660/CDROM cd0 ada0 mountroot> The host system is a fairly new 64-bit Macintosh which is using VirtualBox. Here is the script to define the new machine. VBoxManage createvm --name "vsys" --ostype FreeBSD_64 --register VBoxManage modifyvm "vsys" --memory 1000 --vram 128 --acpi on \ --boot2 dvd --boot1 disk --nic1 nat #setup ttyu0 so the VM can communicate. VBoxManage modifyvm "vsys" --uart1 0x3F8 4 VBoxManage -q modifyvm "vsys" --uartmode1 server '/tmp/vmx' VBoxManage createhd --filename "FreeBSD.VMDK" --size 10000 VBoxManage storagectl x --name "SATA Controller" --add sata --controller \ IntelAHCI --hostiocache on VBoxManage storageattach x --storagectl "SATA Controller" \ --port 0 --device 0 --type hdd --medium "FreeBSD.VMDK" VBoxManage storagectl "vsys" --name "IDE Controller" \ --add ide --controller PIIX4 VBoxManage storageattach "vsys" --storagectl "IDE Controller" \ --port 0 --device 0 --type dvddrive --medium /users/sysbuild/headless.iso From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 15:42:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65AB81065677 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 15:42:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223828FC1A for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 15:42:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.50]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304E1A71A71 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 11:42:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 1476 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2012 15:42:37 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 7570, pid: 14042, t: 0.1904s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Sep 2012 15:42:37 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id D012F33C25; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 11:42:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Warren Block References: <5045b49c.27f1440a.422f.1dc4@mx.google.com> <44y5kps2f0.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 11:42:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Warren Block's message of "Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:37:40 -0600 (MDT)") Message-ID: <44vcfs4gsz.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions , chiehhan Subject: Re: asking for help about "acpi_tz0: _CRT value is absurd, ignored (256.0C) " X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:42:39 -0000 Warren Block writes: > On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >> "chiehhan" writes: >> >>> To whom may concern, >>> >>> I am a greenhorn in the field of freebsd.And when I install >>> Freebsd9.0 on my laptop HP NX6330,a control spam "acpi_tz0: _CRT >>> value is absurd, ignored (256.0C)"occurs. >>> >>> I learned some reference about sysctl and revised the configure file sysctl.conf,adding two lines below into sysctl.conf: >>> hw.acpi.thermal.user_override=1 >>> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._CRT=110.0C >>> but the control spam remains. >>> >>> I read the source code about acpi_thermal.c,but still have no idea >>> about how to solve this problem.I am a little desperated and turn >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org for help.Would you please send me a >>> solution? >> >> A solution to what problem? The "ignored" message isn't a problem on its >> own; do you think it causing some other trouble that you didn't describe? > > I have a similar HP system. That message is logged a couple of times > a minute, hiding other messages in the logs and making them roll over > quickly. That particular system is a Pentium D which wasn't really > worth much effort, but it would still be nice to see this annoyance > fixed. Yes, I would agree that a repeated message is much more of an annoyance than having it just happen once at boot time. With a Pentium D, there probably isn't a core temperature monitor at all (I *think* that's true for all of them, but it's definitely true for some), so you just want to turn the messages off. Unfortunately, I can't browse sources now, but I think that what happens might be controlled by events going through devd. If that's correct, you should be able to add an event rule to drop events related to your non-existant thermistor (or delete one that already exists). You also might be able to change the polling period for the thermal device. Good luck. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 16:04:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5F01065675 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 16:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA38F8FC17 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 16:04:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.42]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BEFA719D9 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:04:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 30816 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2012 16:04:41 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 6145, pid: 24036, t: 0.2121s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Sep 2012 16:04:40 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 6597733C24; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:04:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Mario Lobo References: <44txvds23l.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20120904230305.46a318b6@papi> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:04:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Mario Lobo's message of "Wed, 5 Sep 2012 08:25:57 -0300") Message-ID: <44r4qg4fs7.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox install problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:04:43 -0000 Mario Lobo writes: > 2012/9/4 Warren Block > >> On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote: >> >> On Sep 4, 2012 7:03 PM, "Mario Lobo" wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> All I've done was "csup -L 2 ports-supfile" with ports-www in it. >>>> Then cd /usr/ports/www/firefox; make with default options. >>>> >>>> As for my /etc/make.conf >>>> >>>> CPUTYPE?=nocona >>>> OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f10 >>>> OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f10 >>>> WITH_KDE4=yes >>>> WITH_CUPS=yes >>>> WITH_ICONS=KDE4 >>>> WITHOUT_GNOME=yes >>>> PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION=python2.7 >>>> PERL_VERSION=5.10.4 >>>> >>>> If it is its fault, it will be the first time in around 3,5 years. >>>> >>> >>> did you _only_ csup www in ports? ill have to check but im not sure >>> libvpx >>> is in www... im not in a place to check at this exact second but my memory >>> is that is providing webm support so probably in audio or multimedia >>> >> >> multimedia/libvpx would not have been updated. Selectively updating ports >> is not supported. Symlinking libraries to missing versions is often a >> source of mysterious problems later. >> > > > I had run csup with ports-multimedia since the first libvpx error came up!. > Libvpx was already up to date by the way, and correctly installed. So i did > not Symlink a library to any "missing version". But not necessarily the version that your other ports had been tested against. This can lead to mysterious problems, as you may have noticed. > "Selectively updating ports is not supported". Then I must wonder why do > we have the option to put "ports-{$port}" inside the supfile, and not a > mandatory ports-all. Sometimes, for some purposes, it works, and keeping it around helps some experts (especially porters). But "not supported" means "please don't ask us to help you use it." That is, you should update the whole port tree and update all dependent ports before reporting a problem. Here is what you should do: (1) Update your ports tree. You can use any method to do this (e.g. cvs, cvsup, subversion, portsnap), but update the whole tree at the same time. (2) If step (1) did not update your INDEX file, update it now. Possible methods include "make fetch" and "make index". I you use portupgrade, "portsdb -Uu" is the best way. (3) cd /usr/ports && make clean Kind of overkill in most cases, but when your port tree is building in bogus directories for no apparent reason, overkill may save your butt. (4) Upgrade all of the ports that firefox depends on (and the ones they depend on). Tools like portmaster or portupgrade make this much easier. (5) Rebuild the vpx port, even if it's already up to date. (6) Then rebuild the firefox port. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 16:38:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F381106566B for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 16:38:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryanrfrederick@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297FE8FC12 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 16:38:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so754121obb.13 for ; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:38:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9IfMSRkK5VxRYEplzg7an/U9RzycXIcmUcY/QsF7ny4=; b=T666yXCQYN/idslfNicUjuNWh4aUwJ2PgKvJAALIwvZJmiErnopu0xPbuQd0TCjKj7 DIJ4Jy2YcMCt64YvmLmA8zcz2ZAtE5V+dXkNbOyFunA1JrjlD19R7OFMgQa4Mf6QdteJ Hy5TN9/JTZA6vkXG8tfYjpNmNGbQj/bKfyKyspwqi5RyNRFBt5fUFjGwWfy3vgZBVBU6 hXsqCB06er8CNxQhu2CYBWE0rMWEesgW+qpxxH3J5D0KrBH/+sU0o0VXezk71ogOPC9c FCtMvX0v6ee+HDaRD/qdbxIFalxi5use/cSTm4q7e7naqU7u33vndnpSvCNjbPj84PbI H5UA== Received: by 10.182.180.39 with SMTP id dl7mr14471854obc.40.1346863120321; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:38:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2610:1d8:a03:1:d267:e5ff:fe44:3b30? ([2610:1d8:a03:1:d267:e5ff:fe44:3b30]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id kc5sm930988obb.21.2012.09.05.09.38.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:38:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <50478008.7010705@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 11:38:32 -0500 From: Ryan Frederick User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111120 Icedove/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201209051426.q85EQ2pl050337@x.it.okstate.edu> In-Reply-To: <201209051426.q85EQ2pl050337@x.it.okstate.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Virtual FreeBSD9.0 ISO Image Won't Mount Root FS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:38:41 -0000 What option argument did you specify for the -V (volume ID) option when you created the ISO with the `mkisofs` command? I believe that the root filesystem lies under /dev/iso9660/ for which the ISO loader's default configuration specifies as /dev/iso9660/FREEBSD_INSTALL. Thus you'll need to change the vfs.root.mountfrom loader variable to be cd9660:/dev/iso9660/ Ryan On 09/05/2012 09:26 AM, Martin McCormick wrote: > The ISO image is the FreeBSD9.0 bootonly CDROM for amd64 > systems. I added loader.conf to /boot in order to activate a > serial console and this along with socat appears to be working > as it should. This is great because remote desktop is not an > option. > > The VM boot starts normally with the spinning bars and > normal startup messages until: > > cd0: cd present [85585 x 2048 byte records] > Timecounter "TSC" frequency 3368628976 Hz quality 800 > Trying to mount root from cd9660:/dev/iso9660/FREEBSD_INSTALL [ro]... > mountroot: waiting for device /dev/iso9660/FREEBSD_INSTALL ... > Mounting from cd9660:/dev/iso9660/FREEBSD_INSTALL failed with error 19. > > Loader variables: > vfs.root.mountfrom=cd9660:/dev/iso9660/FREEBSD_INSTALL > vfs.root.mountfrom.options=ro > > Manual root filesystem specification: > : [options] > Mount using filesystem > and with the specified (optional) option list. > > eg. ufs:/dev/da0s1a > zfs:tank > cd9660:/dev/acd0 ro > (which is equivalent to: mount -t cd9660 -o ro /dev/acd0 /) > > ? List valid disk boot devices > . Yield 1 second (for background tasks) > Abort manual input > > mountroot> > > I enter a Question Mark. > > mountroot> ? > > List of GEOM managed disk devices: > iso9660/CDROM cd0 ada0 > > mountroot> > > The host system is a fairly new 64-bit Macintosh which > is using VirtualBox. Here is the script to define the new > machine. > > VBoxManage createvm --name "vsys" --ostype FreeBSD_64 --register > VBoxManage modifyvm "vsys" --memory 1000 --vram 128 --acpi on \ > --boot2 dvd --boot1 disk --nic1 nat > #setup ttyu0 so the VM can communicate. > VBoxManage modifyvm "vsys" --uart1 0x3F8 4 > VBoxManage -q modifyvm "vsys" --uartmode1 server '/tmp/vmx' > VBoxManage createhd --filename "FreeBSD.VMDK" --size 10000 > VBoxManage storagectl x --name "SATA Controller" --add sata --controller \ > IntelAHCI --hostiocache on > VBoxManage storageattach x --storagectl "SATA Controller" \ > --port 0 --device 0 --type hdd --medium "FreeBSD.VMDK" > > VBoxManage storagectl "vsys" --name "IDE Controller" \ > --add ide --controller PIIX4 > VBoxManage storageattach "vsys" --storagectl "IDE Controller" \ > --port 0 --device 0 --type dvddrive --medium /users/sysbuild/headless.iso > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 16:58:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1710106566C for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 16:58:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8148FC0A for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 16:58:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T9IwE-00053u-2y for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 18:58:50 +0200 Received: from 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 18:58:50 +0200 Received: from jb.1234abcd by 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 18:58:50 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jb Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 16:58:32 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 33 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0) Subject: 9.1-RC1 kernel dump - anybody willing to tackle it ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:58:56 -0000 Hi, here is a kernel dump I got recently: # ls -al /var/crash/ total 285944 drwxr-x--- 2 root wheel 512 Sep 5 06:21 . drwxr-xr-x 25 root wheel 512 Sep 5 08:30 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2 Sep 5 06:21 bounds -rw------- 1 root wheel 105813 Sep 5 06:21 core.txt.0 -rw------- 1 root wheel 449 Sep 5 06:21 info.0 -rw------- 1 root wheel 314290176 Sep 5 06:21 vmcore.0 # cat /var/crash/info.0 Dump header from device /dev/ada0s2b Architecture: i386 Architecture Version: 2 Dump Length: 314290176B (299 MB) Blocksize: 512 Dumptime: Wed Sep 5 06:19:44 2012 Hostname: localhost.localdomain Magic: FreeBSD Kernel Dump Version String: FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 #0: Tue Aug 14 03:56:40 UTC 2012 root@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Panic String: page fault Dump Parity: 3108753009 Bounds: 0 Dump Status: good core.txt.0 : http://pastebin.com/88DEw63T jb From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 17:24:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0415A1065670 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:24:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE618FC08 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:24:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so879537obb.13 for ; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 10:24:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=SKdn8w38VcoC/lgcYiFPibJRnmtw76XEMuxbJAYitPY=; b=gvfSw6Dgj8QEvSZ2aajEqxb5/UD9KfntWzqzzMDbnF61WDVLC9cvIg06MQwIU7o7Si Vfp76qBhqlPQn9X2b/lzqkA6skAdsFV8Oh7jgfc41OiS+xKODbsj3na+jAVPH7oagaMf PTsUp0s8rwjBcvQFHP6bRRc2RjBTcYDD70cmttKIEkAXbPvX0axK0QhK9baljnSbER6g 7HflSmmHwXNeEjZ0aWDip7eehfkpZOvULb/auAqAy0YXEt1MTqc9sa3QjbsY6NNbaASi WpCQFQneGAFmG9oQJsxwcOrCUxtD7rKyWFvsNl3ELwp0RQMuY+C7PsLDqA2qJL3t1tCU e3OA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.171.109 with SMTP id at13mr18258397oec.79.1346865862720; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 10:24:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.0.194 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 10:24:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1T9ICM-0004xS-S2@internal.tormail.org> References: <44txvds23l.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20120904230305.46a318b6@papi> <1T9ICM-0004xS-S2@internal.tormail.org> Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 14:24:22 -0300 Message-ID: From: Mario Lobo To: Jan Beich X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkKKcSLcPfD67Rjhwz4GC6C/A3sfu2PvBHYGOhG6RIa/I5ou7u7bEhW7f42AJgudDjEEtZ/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [SOLVED] Firefox install problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 17:24:24 -0000 2012/9/5 Jan Beich > Mario Lobo writes: > > > @Jan > > > > ~]>ident /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk > > /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk: > > $FreeBSD: ports/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk,v 1.63 2012/07/26 23:12:19 flo Exp $ > > > > As far as I could find, this seems to be the latest version. > > Try another cvsup server or subversion. > > You nailed it Jan ! I updated bsd.gecko,mk from the link you posted: http://trillian.chruetertee.ch/freebsd-gecko/changeset/951 It solved BOTH problems! (libvpx and the install issue). I deleted the symlink to libvpx.so and compilation/installation went on without a glitch. I tested it with all firefox port versions under www/ and they all went ok. Thanks to all that took the time to help. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 17:38:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCCC1065676; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:38:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from orientalsensation@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC8C8FC1A; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:38:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iebc12 with SMTP id c12so1990255ieb.13 for ; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 10:38:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=nin1t0DjpQ8Y2WCWkCL9px7wCD7f2T0ctuv+AphHIAg=; b=ntb93mM5U9gteHC9kju328aSZAd5l5z2MZ2bNhZVTP4PDZUw5O8LxN8XrJowKL/RWd OIgvaGPj2ax4E/HtzjDCWhcjAiPFPQZlnEhOOLc6SduNgpYqHK5blAJAK2whggndNfaf K7cbSjTH23viU+cyrqyomFScusBbEzyPBqtQPUp4kFskJ1HEVaJ0HJtc07+3Ln4IcwDq 2pZMIf88ud1XVAmeCDkVG4zQHFaQeZcFkBJ9gWExF2p/Q4JAn1OVo0McZo7lyb9ebnGp Ygt3sm36tSV+JWrRBKFHh5uU/4K/n4JrJsg+M6MZn3biX53doc+FvLPfBDC9C+hQCEZ3 2kaA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.160.233 with SMTP id xn9mr19089398igb.37.1346866734500; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 10:38:54 -0700 (PDT) Sender: orientalsensation@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.81.226 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 10:38:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 19:38:54 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: fwvXIjLpxt-LY7KpynAirVnwW_o Message-ID: From: OriS To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Auto-mounting sshfs from /etc/fstab X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 17:38:55 -0000 Hello all, I've been trying to find a page on the Internet where an example is posted explaining how to mount sshfs from /etc/fstab, but I can't find any! I'm on 9.1-PR amd64 and I've installed Fuse and sshfs, I have enabled Fuse in rc.conf and I can see /dev/fuse. Furthermore, using sshfs from the command line, I am even able to mount the remote file system. I can manually mount the remote file system using: *sshfs user@host:/ /mnt* Then, I do 'mount -p' and get: */dev/fuse0 /mnt fusefs.sshfs rw,sync 0 0* This isn't sufficient for mounting/unmounting from fstab since it's missing the authentication details I've used in sshfs. So.. the question is: How to add the authentication details to /etc/fstab so that I can mount the sshfs just by using: *mount /mnt* Thanks in advance, and kindly Cc me on your replies! /OriS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 20:08:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27ED1065672 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 20:08:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from woodbine.london.02.net (woodbine.london.02.net [87.194.255.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5408FC12 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 20:08:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.51] (87.194.237.233) by woodbine.london.02.net (8.5.140) id 4FED9DF101CB5D15 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 21:07:39 +0100 Message-ID: <5047B10B.2000800@onetel.com> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 21:07:39 +0100 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111228 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5045b49c.27f1440a.422f.1dc4@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: <5045b49c.27f1440a.422f.1dc4@mx.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: asking for help about "acpi_tz0: _CRT value is absurd, ignored (256.0C) " X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 20:08:53 -0000 On 04/09/2012 08:58, chiehhan wrote: > To whom may concern, > > I am a greenhorn in the field of freebsd.And when I install > Freebsd9.0 on my laptop HP NX6330,a control spam "acpi_tz0: _CRT > value is absurd, ignored (256.0C)"occurs. I created a custom ASL as a workaround. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi/2009-March/005558.html You can see that I changed the line that says Return (C316 (0x04, 0x00)) to say Return (C316 (0x00, 0x02)) which on my laptop gives a temperature of 95C > > I learned some reference about sysctl and revised the configure file > sysctl.conf,adding two lines below into sysctl.conf: > hw.acpi.thermal.user_override=1 > hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._CRT=110.0C but > the control spam remains. Good try but hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._CRT gets set back to -1 http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi/2009-March/005549.html > > I read the source code about acpi_thermal.c,but still have no idea > about how to solve this problem.I am a little desperated and turn > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org for help.Would you please send me a > solution? I think the steps are 1) dump your ASL as per http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/acpi-debug.html starting at section 12.17.4 ASL, acpidump, and IASL 2) open your dumped ASL in a plain text editor (vi, joe, ...) and modify the value of "Method (_CRT, 0, Serialized)". http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi/2009-March/005562.html shows you some values you can use. Others may work as your ASL is almost certainly different from mine. 3) recompile your modified ASL and load it, following section 12.17.4 ASL, acpidump, and IASL in the handbook. 4) restart your computer and check the value of hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._CRT If it doesn't work go back to step 2. YMMV (that means my laptop is running fine several years later but don't blame me if yours blows up :) ) Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 21:43:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798C4106564A for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 21:43:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: from icp-osb-irony-out2.external.iinet.net.au (icp-osb-irony-out2.external.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E23698FC16 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 21:43:40 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnAJAFHGR1B8lJvv/2dsb2JhbABFhRy0fQSBCoEHgiABAQQBOj8FCwsNAzYUGDETiAcFunaLW4UbYAOVWIVNNYoZgnU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,376,1344182400"; d="scan'208";a="30611747" Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.phoenix) ([124.148.155.239]) by icp-osb-irony-out2.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 06 Sep 2012 05:43:38 +0800 Received: by smtp.phoenix (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2C2D727E; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 07:43:38 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 07:43:38 +1000 From: andrew clarke To: OriS Message-ID: <20120905214338.GA9567@ozzmosis.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Auto-mounting sshfs from /etc/fstab X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 21:43:41 -0000 On Wed 2012-09-05 19:38:54 UTC+0200, OriS (site.freebsd@orientalsensation.com) wrote: > I've been trying to find a page on the Internet where an example is posted > explaining how to mount sshfs from /etc/fstab, but I can't find any! Have you tried running sshfs from cron? eg. run "crontab -e" as a regular user and add: @reboot /usr/local/bin/sshfs remotehost: $HOME/mnt/remote Note: Untested. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 22:01:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0FC4106568B for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 22:01:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E69F8FC1A for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 22:01:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-49-179.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.49.179]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AE3276C6; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 00:00:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q85M0pxa002495; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 00:00:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 00:00:51 +0200 From: Polytropon To: andrew clarke Message-Id: <20120906000051.998afd39.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120905214338.GA9567@ozzmosis.com> References: <20120905214338.GA9567@ozzmosis.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: OriS , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Auto-mounting sshfs from /etc/fstab X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 22:01:01 -0000 On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 07:43:38 +1000, andrew clarke wrote: > On Wed 2012-09-05 19:38:54 UTC+0200, OriS (site.freebsd@orientalsensation.com) wrote: > > > I've been trying to find a page on the Internet where an example is posted > > explaining how to mount sshfs from /etc/fstab, but I can't find any! > > Have you tried running sshfs from cron? eg. run "crontab -e" as a > regular user and add: > > @reboot /usr/local/bin/sshfs remotehost: $HOME/mnt/remote > > Note: Untested. Also untested, but possible, if you want it to happen "system-wide": Add a section to /etc/rc.local: echo -n " sshfs" /usr/local/bin/sshfs And to /etc/rc.shutdown.local: echo -n " sshfs" umount Note that you can add additional configuration tweaks by using the rc.conf mechanism, and you can also add tests to increase reliability. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 22:03:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E64106566C for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 22:03:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elias_chr@otenet.gr) Received: from sphinx.otenet.gr (sphinx.otenet.gr [83.235.69.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4428FC12 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 22:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pluto.universe (athedsl-4467997.home.otenet.gr [94.71.109.13]) by sphinx.otenet.gr (ESMTP) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 00:57:46 +0300 (EEST) From: Elias Chrysocheris To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 00:57:43 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-RELEASE-p9; KDE/4.8.4; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201209060057.44039.elias_chr@otenet.gr> Subject: Re: Auto-mounting sshfs from /etc/fstab X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 22:03:43 -0000 In the past I wanted to do so in my system. I had one server called "pluto" and I wanted to sshfs one directory from my laptop. The first thing I had to do was to make passwordless ssh from my laptop to the server (there are a lot of pages in the internet to explain how to do this, so I will not explain how-to...) When passwordless ssh login is possible then a line in your fstab like the following does the job: sshfs#your_username_here@pluto:/Common/ /Network_Folders/Pluto/ fuse BatchMode=yes,reconnect,allow_other,users,gid=users,umask=002 0 0 In this way the system automounts the directory /Common that exists in "pluto" in my local directory /Network_Folders/Pluto Of cource "pluto" must have a specific ip (or available through naming service e.t.c.). In my case it has a static IP so I had its declaration in /etc/hosts Hope this helped you Elias From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 23:13:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67396106566C; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 23:13:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougs@dawnsign.com) Received: from mailfilter.dawnsign.com (pyxis.dawnsign.com [69.198.101.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F978FC17; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 23:13:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailfilter.dawnsign.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailfilter.dawnsign.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB38895D32; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 16:13:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Draco.dawnsign.com (draco.dawnsign.com [192.168.101.33]) by mailfilter.dawnsign.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFB795CA3; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 16:13:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DRACO.dawnsign.com ([fe80::6062:7fef:2376:a729]) by Draco.dawnsign.com ([fe80::6062:7fef:2376:a729%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0379.000; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 16:13:44 -0700 From: Doug Sampson To: 'Edward Tomasz Napierala' Thread-Topic: NFSv4 ACL permissions setting Thread-Index: Ac2HCSZAAjTVzuZmTtKA54+RytNrQwA3PYCAAPVobrA= Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 23:13:44 +0000 Message-ID: References: <60FD2657-0D3C-4E6C-ABD0-652DA424D9A2@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <60FD2657-0D3C-4E6C-ABD0-652DA424D9A2@freebsd.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.101.149] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: NFSv4 ACL permissions setting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 23:13:53 -0000 > Wiadomo=B6=E6 napisana przez Doug Sampson w dniu 31 sie 2012, o godz. 01:= 42: >=20 > [..] >=20 > > group:DSP-production:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow <<<<<---= - > - > > group:DSP-production:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow <<<<<---= - > - >=20 > This itself looks like a bug in setfacl(1). I'll look into it. > However... >=20 > [..] >=20 > > #!/bin/sh > > # run this script where you wish to effect the changes > > # reset perms to default > > find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 setfacl -b * >=20 > Why the asterisk? Also, using "-m" with NFSv4 ACLs is not a very good > idea - it's supposed to work, but with NFSv4 ACLs the ordering does > matter, > and "-m" simply modifies the ACL entry in place, while the effect of the > entry might depend e.g. on "deny" entries before it. Use "-a" instead. >=20 Forgive me- I am not particularly strong when it comes to shell scripting. = I will modify so that the -a parameter is used instead of -m when setting n= ew entries. What would you use in place of the asterisk when you want to apply the "set= facl -b" command to either all files or all directories? The period? ~Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 23:20:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C776106564A for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 23:20:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etnapierala@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F7A8FC0C for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 23:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so997693wgb.31 for ; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:20:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=rlRbi2pSSeqKvtWzRmaaN6PDS5sLA4o+i2DTFHPHnr8=; b=Bn763jd93qdUn0pIzeXUuo9JobjZv/7HEOmQuK2soHzKHy50ARloN9E6UFLaZbsv7o 0FEK4BuPCZ/QWmlSAkGJklsVNCgubiUDanQCPHqQduvPUYQUxYTuJHf2QOisUgB2b2yo HPD4nIvz9cEGfK24QPX4scXaizLLs2syNI04DjQys5FScPpGVxWf0MoRLLqELUX2/5pH vN6YT64+xKhQgTK6I3GjCt/P8Ya+TgeAIfWCj9qm2lpy8O26eERFs8W5ZqLrvrZe883X KSoPsjfZKxpqOIbnSToIs3b0jL9ltEYwQb4atJ7LuweCV9skKi7V22WZihAZVdCZ4C21 lv3g== Received: by 10.180.94.38 with SMTP id cz6mr369330wib.10.1346887248426; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:20:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.104] (45.81.datacomsa.pl. [195.34.81.45]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w7sm1144188wiz.0.2012.09.05.16.20.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=C5=82a?= Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=B3a?= In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 01:20:38 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7ACB9DDC-7CF2-4521-9234-35BA6441D0B3@freebsd.org> References: <60FD2657-0D3C-4E6C-ABD0-652DA424D9A2@freebsd.org> To: Doug Sampson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: NFSv4 ACL permissions setting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 23:20:50 -0000 Wiadomo=B6=E6 napisana przez Doug Sampson w dniu 6 wrz 2012, o godz. = 01:13: >> Wiadomo=B6=E6 napisana przez Doug Sampson w dniu 31 sie 2012, o godz. = 01:42: >>=20 >> [..] >>=20 >>> group:DSP-production:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow = <<<<<---- >> - >>> group:DSP-production:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow = <<<<<---- >> - >>=20 >> This itself looks like a bug in setfacl(1). I'll look into it. >> However... >>=20 >> [..] >>=20 >>> #!/bin/sh >>> # run this script where you wish to effect the changes >>> # reset perms to default >>> find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 setfacl -b * >>=20 >> Why the asterisk? Also, using "-m" with NFSv4 ACLs is not a very = good >> idea - it's supposed to work, but with NFSv4 ACLs the ordering does >> matter, >> and "-m" simply modifies the ACL entry in place, while the effect of = the >> entry might depend e.g. on "deny" entries before it. Use "-a" = instead. >>=20 >=20 > Forgive me- I am not particularly strong when it comes to shell = scripting. I will modify so that the -a parameter is used instead of -m = when setting new entries. Ok. It's simply a matter of replacing '-m' with '-a0'. Btw, the bug in setfacl(1) command has been fixed in HEAD and will be merged into STABLE in a month from now. > What would you use in place of the asterisk when you want to apply the = "setfacl -b" command to either all files or all directories? The period? Directories: find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 setfacl -b Files: find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 setfacl -b The whole point of xargs here is to take the list of files it gets from = find and turn it into a series of arguments for setfacl. So, in the example = above, the actual invocation of setfacl would read "setfacl -b first-file = second-file" etc. With the asterisk, it would be "setfacl -b * first-file = second-file"; this means setfacl would modify not only the files passed by find, but = also all the files in the current directory. --=20 If you cut off my head, what would I say? Me and my head, or me and my = body? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 6 00:09:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E9E1065670 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 00:09:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC0D8FC0A for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 00:09:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8602DTK026172 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 19:02:13 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <5047E804.7050406@tundraware.com> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 19:02:12 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (ozzie.tundraware.com [192.168.0.1]); Wed, 05 Sep 2012 19:02:13 -0500 (CDT) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: q8602DTK026172 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Somewhat OT: Using Pipes Inside a GNU Make File X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:09:42 -0000 A bit off topic, but I'm kind of stuck. I am using gmake and want to do something like this: FOO := $(shell a | b | c) But this appears not to work. Only the 'a' command is executed. The remainder of the pipeline is ignored. Is there some clean way to implement this kind of thing? -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 6 00:17:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2F9106564A; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 00:17:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3058FC1D; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 00:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-49-179.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.49.179]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD36B3D370; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 02:17:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q860HUNQ002875; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 02:17:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 02:17:30 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Edward Tomasz =?UTF-8?B?TmFwaWVyYcWCYQ==?= Message-Id: <20120906021730.74a446b9.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <7ACB9DDC-7CF2-4521-9234-35BA6441D0B3@freebsd.org> References: <60FD2657-0D3C-4E6C-ABD0-652DA424D9A2@freebsd.org> <7ACB9DDC-7CF2-4521-9234-35BA6441D0B3@freebsd.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Doug Sampson , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: NFSv4 ACL permissions setting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:17:33 -0000 On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 01:20:38 +0200, Edward Tomasz NapieraÅ‚a wrote: > Wiadomość napisana przez Doug Sampson w dniu 6 wrz 2012, o godz. 01:13: > >> Wiadomość napisana przez Doug Sampson w dniu 31 sie 2012, o godz. 01:42: > >> > >> [..] > >> > >>> group:DSP-production:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow <<<<<---- > >> - > >>> group:DSP-production:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow <<<<<---- > >> - > >> > >> This itself looks like a bug in setfacl(1). I'll look into it. > >> However... > >> > >> [..] > >> > >>> #!/bin/sh > >>> # run this script where you wish to effect the changes > >>> # reset perms to default > >>> find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 setfacl -b * > >> > >> Why the asterisk? Also, using "-m" with NFSv4 ACLs is not a very good > >> idea - it's supposed to work, but with NFSv4 ACLs the ordering does > >> matter, > >> and "-m" simply modifies the ACL entry in place, while the effect of the > >> entry might depend e.g. on "deny" entries before it. Use "-a" instead. > >> > > > > Forgive me- I am not particularly strong when it comes to shell scripting. I will modify so that the -a parameter is used instead of -m when setting new entries. > > Ok. It's simply a matter of replacing '-m' with '-a0'. > > Btw, the bug in setfacl(1) command has been fixed in HEAD and will > be merged into STABLE in a month from now. > > > What would you use in place of the asterisk when you want to apply the "setfacl -b" command to either all files or all directories? The period? > > Directories: > > find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 setfacl -b > > Files: > > find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 setfacl -b > > The whole point of xargs here is to take the list of files it gets from find > and turn it into a series of arguments for setfacl. So, in the example above, > the actual invocation of setfacl would read "setfacl -b first-file second-file" > etc. With the asterisk, it would be "setfacl -b * first-file second-file"; > this means setfacl would modify not only the files passed by find, but also > all the files in the current directory. Note that the parameter lists constructed by xargs and passed to setfacl might grow quite long and possibly exceed the respective buffer. In that case, you could modify the command to process one result at a time: # find . -type f -exec /bin/setfacl -b {} \; for all files, and # find . -type d -exec /bin/setfacl -b {} \; for all directories. Not tested. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 6 00:24:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71763106564A for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 00:24:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryan@shatow.net) Received: from secure.xzibition.com (secure.xzibition.com [173.160.118.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A11E8FC14 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 00:24:18 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=shatow.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sweb; b=uT+Bn3 IPW/B3JXj0/8zvjd7xEZOeCirWR4lGMlTmsLDG7sLA5LVqxzMpY3vhWy2rhjWxbl utEk9YM3j5I+VilcyRA2jU1ettbsGxQNLBn5aPEJ/FoERyLD5wNaN60WTkCl+QJ1 tj2/9pPirQ7o7BcRt9Vm9UQ9WdIEyJCCvzh38= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=shatow.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sweb; bh=OBJu8FuHB1lf Ud72QRzA68b+Sl15KI763zuod55vjXk=; b=Z1rU/3p8pULs7j8aOe3gJ8wX2wW6 ESOg1brut8LSIiAAT1ZEDeH0dnJpHBUv8knxPOCr1cZKA+gveQzuZ5+7RVIgLqlO FkaYMjoNaceoGojvr1K4igr2Q2J0cBaxMP2Bfk3vIMwcC8KU/tPK8+lX8HDdvpD7 e+Ld6t7AZ8ERTC8= Received: (qmail 93254 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2012 19:24:16 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.0.115?) (bryan@shatow.net@10.10.0.115) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 5 Sep 2012 19:24:16 -0500 Message-ID: <5047ED29.2040001@shatow.net> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 19:24:09 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tundra@tundraware.com References: <5047E804.7050406@tundraware.com> In-Reply-To: <5047E804.7050406@tundraware.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 OpenPGP: id=3C9B0CF9; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Somewhat OT: Using Pipes Inside a GNU Make File X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:24:19 -0000 On 9/5/2012 7:02 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > A bit off topic, but I'm kind of stuck. I am using gmake and want to > do something like this: > > FOO := $(shell a | b | c) > > But this appears not to work. Only the 'a' command is executed. The > remainder > of the pipeline is ignored. Is there some clean way to implement this > kind of thing? > > I use this in a GNUMakefile and it works fine. BRANCH := $(shell git branch --no-color | grep "^*" | sed -e 's/^\* //') You may need to post a more specific example. Bryan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 6 00:34:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF64E106564A; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 00:34:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougs@dawnsign.com) Received: from mailfilter.dawnsign.com (pyxis.dawnsign.com [69.198.101.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A708FC0C; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 00:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailfilter.dawnsign.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailfilter.dawnsign.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7F495D5A; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:34:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Draco.dawnsign.com (draco.dawnsign.com [192.168.101.33]) by mailfilter.dawnsign.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F1895D51; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:34:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DRACO.dawnsign.com ([fe80::6062:7fef:2376:a729]) by Draco.dawnsign.com ([fe80::6062:7fef:2376:a729%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0379.000; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:34:55 -0700 From: Doug Sampson To: 'Edward Tomasz Napierala' Thread-Topic: NFSv4 ACL permissions setting Thread-Index: Ac2HCSZAAjTVzuZmTtKA54+RytNrQwA3PYCAAPVobrAADv9YAAAMxElA Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 00:34:54 +0000 Message-ID: References: <60FD2657-0D3C-4E6C-ABD0-652DA424D9A2@freebsd.org> <7ACB9DDC-7CF2-4521-9234-35BA6441D0B3@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <7ACB9DDC-7CF2-4521-9234-35BA6441D0B3@freebsd.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.101.149] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: NFSv4 ACL permissions setting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:34:56 -0000 > >>> #!/bin/sh > >>> # run this script where you wish to effect the changes > >>> # reset perms to default > >>> find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 setfacl -b * > >> > >> Why the asterisk? Also, using "-m" with NFSv4 ACLs is not a very good > >> idea - it's supposed to work, but with NFSv4 ACLs the ordering does > >> matter, > >> and "-m" simply modifies the ACL entry in place, while the effect of > the > >> entry might depend e.g. on "deny" entries before it. Use "-a" instead= . > >> > > > > Forgive me- I am not particularly strong when it comes to shell > scripting. I will modify so that the -a parameter is used instead of -m > when setting new entries. >=20 > Ok. It's simply a matter of replacing '-m' with '-a0'. >=20 I did not realize that one could add a numeral to the "-a" parameter to ind= icate the desired order. I just did a 'man setfacl' and indeed it is descri= bed as such. Good to know! Is there a preferred way of ordering? I.e. owner@ at line 0 followed by gro= up@ at line 1 followed by everyone@ at line 2 then followed by the two grou= ps described in my original mail (e.g. dsp-production & dsp-marketing)? Or = is that totally dependent on how I want to structure the permissions so tha= t the desired effect is achieved? For example like this: dougs@dorado:/data# getfacl ADS-New/ # file: ADS-New/ # owner: root # group: DSP-production group:DSP-production:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow group:DSP-marketing:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow owner@:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow group@:rwxpDdaARWcCos:fd----:allow everyone@:------a-R-c--s:------:allow dougs@dorado:/data# where anyone who is a member of the dsp-production group will ALWAYS have f= ull_set permissions simply because that is indicated at line 0 and thus mee= ts the test of line 0? Processing stops at line 0 as long as the user is a = member of that group, right? Does a user who does not belong to any of the groups indicated above and is= n't an owner have the ability to modify the directory? I assume that would = be the everyone@ group... > Btw, the bug in setfacl(1) command has been fixed in HEAD and will > be merged into STABLE in a month from now. What exactly was the bug? Did I uncover it inadvertently? > > What would you use in place of the asterisk when you want to apply the > "setfacl -b" command to either all files or all directories? The period? >=20 > Directories: >=20 > find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 setfacl -b >=20 > Files: >=20 > find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 setfacl -b >=20 > The whole point of xargs here is to take the list of files it gets from > find > and turn it into a series of arguments for setfacl. So, in the example > above, > the actual invocation of setfacl would read "setfacl -b first-file second= - > file" > etc. With the asterisk, it would be "setfacl -b * first-file second- > file"; > this means setfacl would modify not only the files passed by find, but > also > all the files in the current directory. Ah, interesting. I'm going to test the changes to the scripts. Thanks for the feedback. ~Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 6 01:59:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B80106564A for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 01:59:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F848FC12 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 01:59:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q861wwvI028416 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 5 Sep 2012 20:58:58 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <50480361.8030601@tundraware.com> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 20:58:57 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bryan Drewery References: <5047E804.7050406@tundraware.com> <5047ED29.2040001@shatow.net> In-Reply-To: <5047ED29.2040001@shatow.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (ozzie.tundraware.com [192.168.0.1]); Wed, 05 Sep 2012 20:58:58 -0500 (CDT) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: q861wwvI028416 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Somewhat OT: Using Pipes Inside a GNU Make File X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 01:59:09 -0000 On 09/05/2012 07:24 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 9/5/2012 7:02 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: >> A bit off topic, but I'm kind of stuck. I am using gmake and want to >> do something like this: >> >> FOO := $(shell a | b | c) >> >> But this appears not to work. Only the 'a' command is executed. The >> remainder >> of the pipeline is ignored. Is there some clean way to implement this >> kind of thing? >> >> > > I use this in a GNUMakefile and it works fine. > > BRANCH := $(shell git branch --no-color | grep "^*" | sed -e 's/^\* //') > > > You may need to post a more specific example. > > Bryan> _______________________________________________ Here's the line that is failing: 2LATEX = $(shell which rst2latex.py rst2latex | tr '\012' ' ' | awk '{print $1}') --stylesheet=parskip -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 6 02:15:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2EFE106564A for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 02:15:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2BF8FC15 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 02:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q862FnMd001811; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 20:15:49 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q862Fnfa001808; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 20:15:49 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 20:15:49 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Tim Daneliuk In-Reply-To: <50480361.8030601@tundraware.com> Message-ID: References: <5047E804.7050406@tundraware.com> <5047ED29.2040001@shatow.net> <50480361.8030601@tundraware.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 05 Sep 2012 20:15:49 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Bryan Drewery Subject: Re: Somewhat OT: Using Pipes Inside a GNU Make File X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 02:15:55 -0000 On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > On 09/05/2012 07:24 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> On 9/5/2012 7:02 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: >>> A bit off topic, but I'm kind of stuck. I am using gmake and want to >>> do something like this: >>> >>> FOO := $(shell a | b | c) >>> >>> But this appears not to work. Only the 'a' command is executed. The >>> remainder >>> of the pipeline is ignored. Is there some clean way to implement this >>> kind of thing? >>> >>> >> >> I use this in a GNUMakefile and it works fine. >> >> BRANCH := $(shell git branch --no-color | grep "^*" | sed -e 's/^\* //') >> >> >> You may need to post a more specific example. >> >> Bryan> _______________________________________________ > > Here's the line that is failing: > > 2LATEX = $(shell which rst2latex.py rst2latex | tr '\012' ' ' | awk '{print $1}') --stylesheet=parskip Bryan's example is using := for assignment. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 6 06:16:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1DB1106566C for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 06:16:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from orientalsensation@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32188FC16 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 06:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iebc12 with SMTP id c12so3123700ieb.13 for ; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 23:16:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=xxcYhC7hbJ0Z9rP/IqiK+hCIqN9lF01mkiSOTaXZHn0=; b=zIcgQM7Z7wYfRZUdbs5GdK5In9JcO1swlK6wlxKN/O4nRz4ZEBxN7PSn9eHV704M6b 4PFbWeM9yWeIrYuarSQT9zeruCmXCzLHS7WQwwl6cX9Cgo4coSLT8c19ANEDEkMCffkR xER4qgDp+XBxtxCtLEq2dxWNsJtU0NE4CBjQSsRI15UtBgT+tqsENHYqXaQM3RPsiOlt 4YZszmLJMbqFqYZHgrOwAqU/MGKp2kDxMMmxY1P4LkOToyDPy+lOQ7w4xyPqmSvXqVzl YQS8eso7niSaruW/z140IzZ/ufL318LJiJ5/TbIWo2p/d+9qU9D0cNAvjPZZ1fMqhIhT 7ICA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.222.231 with SMTP id qp7mr959065igc.40.1346912162731; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 23:16:02 -0700 (PDT) Sender: orientalsensation@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.81.226 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 23:16:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120905214338.GA9567@ozzmosis.com> References: <20120905214338.GA9567@ozzmosis.com> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:16:02 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LWoxEd4fPLVcSQGeeIyoV7vHORY Message-ID: From: OriS To: andrew clarke Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Auto-mounting sshfs from /etc/fstab X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 06:16:04 -0000 Hello, Well, no I haven't -- I have tried only the fstab route which does serve the purpose for me. Thanks nonetheless :) OriS On Wednesday, September 5, 2012, andrew clarke wrote: > On Wed 2012-09-05 19:38:54 UTC+0200, OriS ( > site.freebsd@orientalsensation.com ) wrote: > > > I've been trying to find a page on the Internet where an example is > posted > > explaining how to mount sshfs from /etc/fstab, but I can't find any! > > Have you tried running sshfs from cron? eg. run "crontab -e" as a > regular user and add: > > @reboot /usr/local/bin/sshfs remotehost: $HOME/mnt/remote > > Note: Untested. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 6 08:16:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD9E106566B for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:16:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 251C88FC12 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop3.herveybayaustralia.com.au (unknown [192.168.0.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 965B15C21 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 18:23:20 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <504859C9.7010402@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 18:07:37 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120728 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: .package files? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 08:16:33 -0000 Just a quickie- has anyone been able to install a .package file on FBSD? File offered an interesting diagnosis: bash script 4 file. Opening in ee (gedit had kittens) displayed that it was indeed a bash script file with one massive difference: there is a line that says skipline=, and from that line number onward it is encoded. Cheers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 6 09:58:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49271065672 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 09:58:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from venkatduvvuru.ml@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55598FC0A for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 09:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so2631584obb.13 for ; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 02:58:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=E7l8bz06V1ETBfgP1CbE50gVjFc0Rcl/DdQbHYKgz6E=; b=MPf5sxlrBys8LxcIedLsXRAITLd0JXXjjzzEX2KXcdL3at87yw6x64ccMxidR0aW1Z rUJpC8Bk+82sJ5c6X1aOHMqtOsOw6x7qYqFN/H5Jt795WC0uaNBrL2vtyuItVGTi0Td0 xFQdssyAfvhKWgqq9zJCbPdgEK7KwVczxWyVRR5Q6yhYcLFZIHAxv1cVUnouPDdrJKjQ 5CkgF1CTo+oJrptnK0/lzyVPSIF9kmThWbi6u0QTItTWPRVDGsFL3h9tzaW989sVorU8 QbbjMHWm5fF817j1A5kUvXwkxv/xwRjTmSdIhJcCF898zW21NKmhHNvEMa7FvuMdkBoY hNvA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.14.101 with SMTP id o5mr1264529obc.1.1346925506782; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 02:58:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.95.138 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 02:58:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:28:26 +0530 Message-ID: From: Venkat Duvvuru To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Patch into kernel sources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 09:58:28 -0000 Hi, Could somebody please point me to a procedure to apply a patch to the sources? I have a driver patch that I would like to commit. /Venkat From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 6 10:10:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B20A106566C for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:10:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC8D8FC0C for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBF569.dip.t-dialin.net [217.251.245.105]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q86AAPH6090489; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:10:26 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q86AAFeR058668; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:10:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q86AA37P010078; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:10:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201209061010.q86AA37P010078@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Venkat Duvvuru From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:28:26 +0530." Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:10:03 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Patch into kernel sources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 10:10:35 -0000 Venkat Duvvuru wrote: > Hi, > Could somebody please point me to a procedure to apply a patch to the > sources? > I have a driver patch that I would like to commit. If you want to send from local mail client man send-pr If you want to send via web http://www.freebsd.org/support/bugreports.html (pointed to from "Report a Bug" on front page) http://www.freebsd.org/ (yup, easily missed on front page with new eyes, as Not a bug)) Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". Send plain text. Not: HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 6 14:57:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47492106566B for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 14:57:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050988FC12 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 14:57:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-49-179.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.49.179]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E5B3D3C5; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 16:57:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q86EvKa2002011; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 16:57:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 16:57:20 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Da Rock Message-Id: <20120906165720.68d9755e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <504859C9.7010402@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <504859C9.7010402@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: .package files? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 14:57:33 -0000 On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 18:07:37 +1000, Da Rock wrote: > Just a quickie- has anyone been able to install a .package file on FBSD? > > File offered an interesting diagnosis: bash script 4 file. Opening in ee > (gedit had kittens) displayed that it was indeed a bash script file with > one massive difference: there is a line that says skipline= number here>, and from that line number onward it is encoded. Is this possibly a shell arthive from Linux? Try "man shar" for more information. Or is it a kind of shell archive that contains a binary or uuencode-encoded data block? You could extract that block manually to a separate file and then try uudecode (or some other decoder) on it. It's possible that it is a "self-contained installer" from a Linux distribution... Keep on fighting, Blondie has puppies. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 6 15:16:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE53106564A for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:16:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sivareddy.obili@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EEAC8FC12 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhr14 with SMTP id hr14so1268986wib.13 for ; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 08:16:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CqCFnvjMiqW3BpFebzVu2HedHV04VwubR5qEVvldH14=; b=AkPzLW8cPHY/9/XJqW/YMXwybTu9Bsj/ffnjUybUNiUIcrHSkAQlvoJ9kheJ+9kON+ 7+lEyWPFznJ5VhNj76OrQS9uyGyoi+GBoz7ieGd2YQdNOSJ8WXRsbWtilDcKmNu/X84+ k3v1G+voqVx7+lnOVmaeXbkAM/FHLJwcLLLNTEJXvX970mb5JUlYrl4HfWPh01veQf3W C89KRVjvlnn9nzerq1HxVZLEhy8W77vEi8GOJfd1+H5by3vUwkillLvFM+dkY7P/PmdL TkrDWRnd8qpCfrq3ExNX8KZMI88xeb7l4WxfmQa9Iq/AtO4pripSuCqULv3v7LtJ3ecL tE5Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.103.4 with SMTP id fs4mr5547106wib.16.1346944614010; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 08:16:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.200.198 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:16:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 20:46:53 +0530 Message-ID: From: SivaReddy Obili To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: RFC 2385 TCP MD5 support on FreeBSD8.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:16:55 -0000 Hi Team, Recently I've downloaded the FreeBSD 8.3 Release ISO Image (FreeBSD-8.3-RELEASE-i386-dvd1 (1).iso) and installed in our machine. Actually our requirement is to check the TCP MD5 support on FreeBSD8.3 . But we were not able to configure BGP MD5 on that machine. Can someone please provide me some inputs how to proceed further from here. Do I need to install any more packages or any patch available to proceed further on this issue? Thank you in advance. Regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 6 15:30:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A63C3106566C for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:30:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [94.23.254.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1C38FC0A for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (mr129166.cri.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.129.166]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 31DBCCE25; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 17:30:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mr129166 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A886078; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 17:30:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 17:30:28 +0200 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: SivaReddy Obili Message-ID: <20120906173028.4448600f@mr129166> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC 2385 TCP MD5 support on FreeBSD8.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:30:36 -0000 Le Thu, 6 Sep 2012 20:46:53 +0530, SivaReddy Obili a écrit : Hello, > Recently I've downloaded the FreeBSD 8.3 Release ISO Image > (FreeBSD-8.3-RELEASE-i386-dvd1 (1).iso) and installed in our machine. > Actually our requirement is to check the TCP MD5 support on > FreeBSD8.3 . > > But we were not able to configure BGP MD5 on that machine. I've used TCP-MD5 signature for bgp between a FreeBSD 8.x and OpenBSD, using setkey(8) to enforce the signature between the peers. That worked (of course, then you shouldn't use tcp-md5 in openbgd). setkey(8): add -4 peer1 peer2 tcp 0x1000 -A tcp-md5 "PASSWORD"; add -4 peer2 peer1 tcp 0x1000 -A tcp-md5 "PASSWORD"; kernconf: # In order to enable IPSEC you MUST also add device crypto to # your kernel configuration options IPSEC #IP security (requires device crypto) device crypto options TCP_SIGNATURE #include support for RFC 2385 You should check that the signature is checked (ie if the signature is bad, bgpd rejects the connection), I've not test this. HTH. Regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 6 15:31:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DFEE1065672 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:31:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1-6.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002238FC1B for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:31:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.43.26] (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q86FVIk4068897; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 11:31:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <5048C1BC.3030001@sentex.net> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 11:31:08 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: SivaReddy Obili References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 64.7.153.18 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC 2385 TCP MD5 support on FreeBSD8.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:31:19 -0000 On 9/6/2012 11:16 AM, SivaReddy Obili wrote: > > But we were not able to configure BGP MD5 on that machine. Perhaps you could post some details as to what you tried. Did you recompile the kernel with MD5 support ? In the kernel, you need options TCP_SIGNATURE options IPSEC device crypto If you have not built a customer kernel, cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf cp GENERIC router in the file router, options TCP_SIGNATURE options IPSEC device crypto in /etc/make.conf add KERNCONF=router cd /usr/src make -j4 buildkernel && make installkernel Then, in /etc/ipsec.conf add something like #.18 is the local machine, .29 the remote machine add 192.168.134.18 192.168.134.29 tcp 0x1000 -A tcp-md5 "HelloMD5" ; add to /etc/rc.conf ipsec_enable="YES" # Set to YES to run setkey on ipsec_file ipsec_file="/etc/ipsec.conf" # Name of config file for setkey cd to /usr/ports/net/quagga and make install in your bgp config, the peer needs a line like neighbor 192.168.134.29 password HelloMD5 ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 6 16:16:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A5B1065672 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 16:16:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429A28FC08 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 16:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.219.130.72] ([66.175.245.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q86GGd8u099587 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 11:16:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <5048CC88.4030107@tundraware.com> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 11:17:12 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5047E804.7050406@tundraware.com> <5047ED29.2040001@shatow.net> <50480361.8030601@tundraware.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]); Thu, 06 Sep 2012 11:16:40 -0500 (CDT) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: q86GGd8u099587 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: Somewhat OT: Using Pipes Inside a GNU Make File X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:16:51 -0000 On 09/05/2012 09:15 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > >> On 09/05/2012 07:24 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >>> On 9/5/2012 7:02 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: >>>> A bit off topic, but I'm kind of stuck. I am using gmake and want to >>>> do something like this: >>>> >>>> FOO := $(shell a | b | c) >>>> >>>> But this appears not to work. Only the 'a' command is executed. The >>>> remainder >>>> of the pipeline is ignored. Is there some clean way to implement this >>>> kind of thing? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I use this in a GNUMakefile and it works fine. >>> >>> BRANCH := $(shell git branch --no-color | grep "^*" | sed -e 's/^\* //') >>> >>> >>> You may need to post a more specific example. >>> >>> Bryan> _______________________________________________ >> >> Here's the line that is failing: >> >> 2LATEX = $(shell which rst2latex.py rst2latex | tr '\012' ' ' | awk '{print $1}') --stylesheet=parskip > > Bryan's example is using := for assignment. That wasn't it, as it turned out. The problem was in the awk statement. Instead of: awk '{print $1}' I had to use: awk '{print $$1}' This is necessary because $1 is a *make* variable but $$1 is the awk variable I wanted ($1).... D'uh .... ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 6 21:38:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75461065673 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 21:38:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lifefornazgul@mail.ru) Received: from fallback1.mail.ru (fallback1.mail.ru [94.100.176.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C798FC14 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 21:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from f179.mail.ru (f179.mail.ru [217.69.128.249]) by fallback1.mail.ru (mPOP.Fallback_MX) with ESMTP id AE7DC928029 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 00:15:06 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ru; s=mail; h=Content-Type:Message-ID:Reply-To:Date:Mime-Version:Subject:To:From; bh=u15+sRJS+iEi4GUFkCUuiMAHWbNoMG8lMF1DGW/RtNM=; b=A151mIBfgp6xwSgC1EUgoptUlR2AwsIannyMyFUsYufhJ4yHwbnmo6cvXdSFGabxvEJgRfTyq4GGjwKhsGjWDqc39qEH1834r8snDKrMqUqV3FXLgpka/BKkd+koGRQo; Received: from mail by f179.mail.ru with local (envelope-from ) id 1T9iTZ-0005yJ-Lw for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:14:57 +0400 Received: from [193.109.166.252] by e.mail.ru with HTTP; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:14:57 +0400 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWF4aW0gR2Fsa2lu?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [193.109.166.252] Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:14:57 +0400 X-Priority: Message-ID: <1346962497.808672791@f179.mail.ru> X-Spam: Not detected X-Mras: Ok X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 21:42:44 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Cant find snmptrapd.conf file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?UTF-8?B?TWF4aW0gR2Fsa2lu?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 21:38:07 -0000 V2hlcmUgaXMgdGhlIGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24gZmlsZSBmb3Igc25tcHRyYXBkPwoKSSdtIHVzaW5n wqBuZXQtc25tcC01LjcuMV83LgphbmQgc3VjY2VzZnVsbHkgc3RhcnRpbmcgc25tcGQgYW5kIHNu bXB0cmFwZC4KCkJ1dCB0aGVyZSBpcyBvbmx5IGEgY29uZmlnIHNubXBkLmNvbmYgIQoKV2h5IGNh biBub3QgSSBmaW5kIGEgZmlsZSBzbm1wdHJhcGQuY29uZiByZWZlcnJlZCBpbiBtYW4/CldoZXJl IGRvIEkgcmVnaXN0ZXIgbXnCoCJ0cmFwaGFuZGxlcnMiPwoKSGVscCBndXlz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 03:41:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143071065670 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 03:41:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from levitch@iglou.com) Received: from rdsmtp.iglou.com (rdsmtp.iglou.com [192.107.41.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C811E8FC15 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 03:41:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iglou.com; s=alpha; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=383OwnZsXxUiDd1DIN/HAi81pyDMUiP7ZI98xLrzwr8=; b=RLWJGBVY5CBOzGRTwIaE6wRgJWhai7m16YSUK8zhPGJsjN7OxJLTrqYQMSZjcaf/wnpQ1i8Anf6ePrxc4voK2uEgzGnO9lJppJPieNsp/UAJvNlutOD1bO5ZQVG3mdd/MxnER3FZh5ZH0C/bXdq5666aEynTJGzbuWP/B5QTaqQ=; Received: from iglou2.iglou.com ([192.107.41.8]:49447 helo=mail.iglou.com) by rdsmtp.iglou.com with esmtpa (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T9pRw-00079x-Rc by authid with igloumta_auth for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 23:41:44 -0400 Received: from shell1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.17]:49700 helo=shell1) by mail.iglou.com with esmtps (TLS cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T9pRw-0007ax-Hc for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 23:41:44 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 23:41:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Darrel X-X-Sender: levitch@shell1 To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (GSO 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: 192.107.41.17 X-IgLou-Customer: 3cb6f76205bd20f518810676a67a982b Cc: Subject: openbsd packet firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 03:41:52 -0000 Hello, When I moved from -fbsd82 to -fbsd90 it required a total reinstall since Packet Filter did not *work* any longer. Now that I have moved from -fbsd90 to the new release candidate, Packet Filter does not work considering at least IPv6 and ssh. I have tested a simple pf.conf on this system with the same result. It seems like I will need to learn ipfw or give up on fbsd. Darrel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 07:31:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DEB106566B for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 07:31:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08A548FC0A for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 07:31:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Sep 2012 07:31:13 -0000 Received: from port-92-206-169-3.dynamic.qsc.de (EHLO CoreI5) [92.206.169.3] by mail.gmx.net (mp069) with SMTP; 07 Sep 2012 09:31:13 +0200 X-Authenticated: #4870692 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/WZngTVPbWdsKjPGhbb/vCpDca7KhxGzC9x2PzkF 5ETzPP/WrEqfl2 Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:31:08 +0200 From: Andreas Rudisch To: Darrel Message-Id: <20120907093108.fa9930aeb87e5935f3d0e3a2@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openbsd packet firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 07:31:20 -0000 On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 23:41:44 -0400 (EDT) Darrel wrote: > Packet Filter does not work Hi, you might want to give more information other than that. Andreas -- GnuPG key : 0x2A573565 | http://www.gnupg.org/howtos/de/ Fingerprint: 925D 2089 0BF9 8DE5 9166 33BB F0FD CD37 2A57 3565 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 11:12:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217DA1065673 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:12:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from venkatduvvuru.ml@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9FE8FC21 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so5501053obb.13 for ; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 04:12:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=6K9XFdMkWcCZPOV35jJDJmQ9eRbAxZq3eYwrR8sDVQk=; b=vo7izbd3nkZgBwKc3LzwPU/vVPen3FIbmBuQu+mq2d+XMRn+ZOhie1I0le5tkw7Ul7 pvsyuv11E/AEpLA5fG3EQgi8nBbNV2NpSu2H35hU/iim+30gLfkgX/7GlUkDHz2MqRFv PstrTJ7TAZDGUHo1mxBY9p9V3l5il72RQQ1hffEpPfk2IpCzPig7HxTUbnboCfbalmSm m9zqqSzI9haC4XV4iGUD/SLEGO0T7KhKD7gWQnw8q2Juq2xVI3eO2nzv2Ft4CzwVBb2L X1nxJfR04HCLm9Kwtje2u9dX3np7OOkVJsvmmAhro4fp0P2h+UgWiFJkRL1s58VFRYMW aOOg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.12.8 with SMTP id u8mr5334428oeb.46.1347016371049; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 04:12:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.95.138 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 04:12:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201209061010.q86AA37P010078@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <201209061010.q86AA37P010078@fire.js.berklix.net> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:42:51 +0530 Message-ID: From: Venkat Duvvuru To: "Julian H. Stacey" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Patch into kernel sources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:12:52 -0000 Does this procedure hold good for a device driver module's patch as well? On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Venkat Duvvuru wrote: > > Hi, > > Could somebody please point me to a procedure to apply a patch to the > > sources? > > I have a driver patch that I would like to commit. > > If you want to send from local mail client > man send-pr > > If you want to send via web > http://www.freebsd.org/support/bugreports.html > (pointed to from "Report a Bug" on front page) > http://www.freebsd.org/ > (yup, easily missed on front page with new eyes, as Not a bug)) > > Cheers, > Julian > -- > Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich > http://berklix.com > Reply below not above, like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". > Send plain text. Not: HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, > quoted-printable. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 11:21:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B261065675 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:21:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 191108FC18 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:21:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.198.112]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 7 Sep 2012 04:20:03 -0700 Message-ID: <5049D862.8000906@a1poweruser.com> Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 07:20:02 -0400 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Darrel References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Sep 2012 11:20:03.0118 (UTC) FILETIME=[B9CEB4E0:01CD8CEA] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openbsd packet firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:21:07 -0000 Darrel wrote: > Hello, > > When I moved from -fbsd82 to -fbsd90 it required a total reinstall since > Packet Filter did not *work* any longer. Now that I have moved from > -fbsd90 to the new release candidate, Packet Filter does not work > considering at least IPv6 and ssh. > > I have tested a simple pf.conf on this system with the same result. > It seems like I will need to learn ipfw or give up on fbsd. > > Darrel > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > pf is way back level in Freebsd, the online openbsd pf manual is at the current pf level and uses the newer syntax for the nat function. You have to use the freebsd pf man pages for correct matching documentation. You can always use ipf (ipfilter) instead of ipfw. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 11:27:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98649106564A for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:27:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lyris-noreply@lyris.sunbelt-software.com) Received: from lyris.sunbelt-software.com (lyris.sunbelt-software.com [66.129.99.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF6298FC14 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:27:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: X-lyris-type: match-phrase From: "Lyris ListManager" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 06:56:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: No Attachments Please X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:27:41 -0000 You sent an email to the Exchange list with an attachment. We have disabled this option as recently a virus was attached. Please resend your posting without it? Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 11:34:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73741065687 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:34:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 552988FC19 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBCB5B.dip.t-dialin.net [93.203.203.91]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q87BYbEi011795; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:34:38 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q87BYPNt064698; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:34:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q87BY13h031876; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:34:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201209071134.q87BY13h031876@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Venkat Duvvuru From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:42:51 +0530." Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 13:34:01 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Patch into kernel sources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:34:46 -0000 Venkat Duvvuru wrote: > Does this procedure hold good for a device driver module's patch as well? Yes > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > Venkat Duvvuru wrote: > > > Hi, > > > Could somebody please point me to a procedure to apply a patch to the > > > sources? > > > I have a driver patch that I would like to commit. > > > > If you want to send from local mail client > > man send-pr > > > > If you want to send via web > > http://www.freebsd.org/support/bugreports.html > > (pointed to from "Report a Bug" on front page) > > http://www.freebsd.org/ > > (yup, easily missed on front page with new eyes, as Not a bug)) > > > > Cheers, > > Julian > > -- > > Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich > > http://berklix.com > > Reply below not above, like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". > > Send plain text. Not: HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, > > quoted-printable. > > > > --e89a8fb1ef564d94e904c91ab01a > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > 3px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">Does this procedure hold good for a = > device driver module's patch as well?=A0

ail_quote"> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Julian H. Stacey < ref=3D"mailto:jhs@berklix.com" target=3D"_blank">jhs@berklix.com> pan> wrote:
;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> >
Venkat Duvvuru wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Could somebody please point me to a procedure to apply a patch to the<= > br> > > sources?
> > I have a driver patch that I would like to commit.
>
>
If you want to send from local mail client
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 man send-pr
>
> If you want to send via web
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 target=3D"_blank">http://www.freebsd.org/support/bugreports.html
> (pointed to from "Report a Bug" on front page)
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 http:= > //www.freebsd.org/
> (yup, easily missed on front page with new eyes, as Not a bug))
>
> Cheers,
> Julian
> --
> Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich //berklix.com" target=3D"_blank">http://berklix.com
> =A0Reply below not above, like a play script. =A0Indent old text with "= > ;> ".
> =A0Send plain text. Not: HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printa= > ble.
>

> > --e89a8fb1ef564d94e904c91ab01a-- > Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". Send plain text. Not: HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 12:19:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB17106566C for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 12:19:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from levitch@iglou.com) Received: from rdsmtp.iglou.com (rdsmtp.iglou.com [192.107.41.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45BC8FC0A for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 12:19:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iglou.com; s=alpha; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Subject:cc:To:From:Date; bh=Y7Ipe9RGVAtzLv9SThJFJNz+WtT7VbZADIwH9jdZsbs=; b=QkJ2y2MRiokWZ+va0xp2mE7u8e5UdbZUwoKOJInqVqLWf/LGIT6t6qXjhTvcOinYtfh9pacvru+dchXku4ey1kgEPs4vYgSA0BalEaNnmrwqCPNNGp+sG8FO5NeIQ0Ju37vNaDYqptEJSuIvBcS31i67nDcvz0aRED9YFRHYHnE=; Received: from iglou3.iglou.com ([192.107.41.6]:59861 helo=mail.iglou.com) by rdsmtp.iglou.com with esmtpa (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T9xXE-0006W9-TP by authid with igloumta_auth for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 08:19:44 -0400 Received: from shell1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.17]:52477 helo=shell1) by mail.iglou.com with esmtps (TLS cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T9xXE-0003Bu-GZ; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 08:19:44 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 08:19:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Darrel X-X-Sender: levitch@shell1 To: Fbsd8 In-Reply-To: <5049D862.8000906@a1poweruser.com> Message-ID: References: <5049D862.8000906@a1poweruser.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (GSO 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Originating-IP: 192.107.41.17 X-IgLou-Customer: 3cb6f76205bd20f518810676a67a982b Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openbsd packet firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 12:19:46 -0000 On Fri, 7 Sep 2012, Fbsd8 wrote: > Darrel wrote: >> Hello, >> >> When I moved from -fbsd82 to -fbsd90 it required a total reinstall since >> Packet Filter did not *work* any longer. Now that I have moved from >> -fbsd90 to the new release candidate, Packet Filter does not work >> considering at least IPv6 and ssh. >> >> I have tested a simple pf.conf on this system with the same result. >> It seems like I will need to learn ipfw or give up on fbsd. >> >> Darrel >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > > pf is way back level in Freebsd, the online openbsd pf manual is at the > current pf level and uses the newer syntax for the nat function. You have to > use the freebsd pf man pages for correct matching documentation. > You can always use ipf (ipfilter) instead of ipfw. > thanks for your kind response. darrel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 13:00:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0323D106566B for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:00:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from levitch@iglou.com) Received: from rdsmtp.iglou.com (rdsmtp.iglou.com [192.107.41.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DDF8FC0A for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:00:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iglou.com; s=alpha; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Subject:cc:To:From:Date; bh=38FkGd3YaL7GNnLyZRUSkflr+iOL1y1g6mNgiLMhTQM=; b=JMZyXosTpEqDwGEykGjQMNMxowb6KoS4CTnyGcP18Q3cfFpUm75W/NFQsSMU3TdUDtGAnQGONE5NONH7Y8uSmiDOOa3rGDILuyDbmsuLdlaDPcGVEWk5NGwamk7EMRgGSE0IgvM8l49M8Xq+oYFvpLbBleD06Zt7+7Cvtj2ONwI=; Received: from iglou2.iglou.com ([192.107.41.8]:48342 helo=mail.iglou.com) by rdsmtp.iglou.com with esmtpa (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T9yAk-0003Ch-Bh by authid with igloumta_auth for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 09:00:34 -0400 Received: from shell1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.17]:52790 helo=shell1) by mail.iglou.com with esmtps (TLS cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1T9yAj-0003jc-SW; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 09:00:34 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:00:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Darrel X-X-Sender: levitch@shell1 To: "cyb."@gmx.net, cyb@gmx.net In-Reply-To: <20120907093108.fa9930aeb87e5935f3d0e3a2@gmx.net> Message-ID: References: <20120907093108.fa9930aeb87e5935f3d0e3a2@gmx.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (GSO 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Originating-IP: 192.107.41.17 X-IgLou-Customer: 3cb6f76205bd20f518810676a67a982b Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openbsd packet firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 13:00:35 -0000 On Fri, 7 Sep 2012, Andreas Rudisch wrote: > On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 23:41:44 -0400 (EDT) > Darrel wrote: > >> Packet Filter does not work > > Hi, > > you might want to give more information other than that. > when i updated from fbsd82 to fbsd90 using buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, reboot, installworld, mergemaster, and make check-old, then packet filter simply did not load. others on the list had the same problem. i do not recall if it was specific to amd64. now that i have updated from fbsd90 to fbsd91rc, ipv6 of packet filter is broken. i can not connect to ipv6 services. nmap run against the machine reports per usual with -4 flag and using -6 flag reports no opened ports. ssh and auth should be open. i substituted a very simple pf.conf and got the same result. i think that there is no troubleshooting to be done, but if you want further information then i will send it. darrel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 13:05:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F7410656D1 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:05:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386B98FC14 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:05:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-63-5.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.63.5]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F6727BC6; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 15:05:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q87D5o6t002060; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 15:05:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 15:05:50 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Darrel Message-Id: <20120907150550.5cd87924.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20120907093108.fa9930aeb87e5935f3d0e3a2@gmx.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openbsd packet firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 13:05:58 -0000 On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:00:27 -0400 (EDT), Darrel wrote: > when i updated from fbsd82 to fbsd90 using buildworld, buildkernel, > installkernel, reboot, installworld, mergemaster, and make check-old, then > packet filter simply did not load. That's nmot 100% the procedure. Please refer to the comment header of /usr/src/Makefile for the full description. It should also be mentioned in The FreeBSD Handbook. 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source tree). 2. `make buildworld' 3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC). 4. `make installkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC). [steps 3. & 4. can be combined by using the "kernel" target] 5. `reboot' (in single user mode: boot -s from the loader prompt). 6. `mergemaster -p' 7. `make installworld' 8. `make delete-old' 9. `mergemaster' (you may wish to use -i, along with -U or -F). 10. `reboot' 11. `make delete-old-libs' (in case no 3rd party program uses them anymore) The proper use of mergemaster and the two delete* targets seems to be different from your description. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 15:44:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89AB106564A for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 15:44:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from levitch@iglou.com) Received: from rdsmtp.iglou.com (rdsmtp.iglou.com [192.107.41.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72EC28FC08 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 15:44:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iglou.com; s=alpha; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Subject:cc:To:From:Date; bh=r6xzIYAgxgppmqU88leQimAiASq4HGiIG/uPepi2RG4=; b=Pm5O4HWimyKwkWXFyHfgeM6iFBAFjqySZ6HPy4shZAPA8hAfL2MvLIQzevr6OeYoJfxQj+b1nxvkH57KHLAZwxevgXUC0kDCkwsKTeQotivtzx8kBSyWYoMiUmlhHVi7ag6yAE2fU4vd2eYLLZpNsqKAhHUGzbNoINWElkJuLzI=; Received: from iglou1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.3]:33816 helo=mail.iglou.com) by rdsmtp.iglou.com with esmtpa (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1TA0jE-000420-FT by authid with igloumta_auth for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:44:20 -0400 Received: from shell1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.17]:57982 helo=shell1) by mail.iglou.com with esmtps (TLS cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from ) id 1TA0jD-0006Ky-Rg; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:44:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:44:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Darrel X-X-Sender: levitch@shell1 To: Polytropon In-Reply-To: <20120907150550.5cd87924.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: References: <20120907093108.fa9930aeb87e5935f3d0e3a2@gmx.net> <20120907150550.5cd87924.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (GSO 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Originating-IP: 192.107.41.17 X-IgLou-Customer: 3cb6f76205bd20f518810676a67a982b Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openbsd packet firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:44:21 -0000 On Fri, 7 Sep 2012, Polytropon wrote: > On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:00:27 -0400 (EDT), Darrel wrote: >> when i updated from fbsd82 to fbsd90 using buildworld, buildkernel, >> installkernel, reboot, installworld, mergemaster, and make check-old, then >> packet filter simply did not load. > > That's nmot 100% the procedure. Please refer to the comment > header of /usr/src/Makefile for the full description. It should > also be mentioned in The FreeBSD Handbook. > > 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source tree). > 2. `make buildworld' > 3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC). > 4. `make installkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC). > [steps 3. & 4. can be combined by using the "kernel" target] > 5. `reboot' (in single user mode: boot -s from the loader prompt). > 6. `mergemaster -p' > 7. `make installworld' > 8. `make delete-old' > 9. `mergemaster' (you may wish to use -i, along with -U or -F). > 10. `reboot' > 11. `make delete-old-libs' (in case no 3rd party program uses them anymore) > > The proper use of mergemaster and the two delete* targets > seems to be different from your description. You are correct, of course. Actually that is what I have been doing, except that I have been running 'make delete-old' after mergemaster. Also, I have been deleting /usr/obj/* before 'cd /usr/src' and after 'cd /usr/src' running 'make cleandir && make cleandir'. Thanks for the clarification. Darrel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 17:55:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E02106566C for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:55:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kayasaman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58BF38FC0A for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:55:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaak11 with SMTP id k11so1132294eaa.13 for ; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 10:55:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tUqS4qFytBfcReqEchaDBcCtAlmwlz5DkZgwP2t4vDI=; b=qXCOU0iX++vpiuUnfI6oe1ZGXgnH5ZsBmnk4T0E3VQDJddgCGwaABJo7w8GLZqoRN0 tYOJ4AJhWmwkssNp+IDJmUzWYLo6g3kWdTJs5Jl+/ifsnC6yI5cax2a0pG00pDsI0cwg Mt+5K17qZpbJbZTl2Es0r0gd7wI2MKJv3FSoDOgciD/vSb8AxmqWrpsRmxvwz0n2t8mK GC598GglCYo3J2/13e0mcKd87MBOHb/BTYUBehp1jT8VHR2+7sdIQdYCs+Wwlz8fEV+u 15OosZIepsuPtxeZlug6baKOMezmQop2f8A6n1IRu9wa82PhrIypH+nKOVv8GJ04mkRc 80Zw== Received: by 10.14.202.131 with SMTP id d3mr9404244eeo.32.1347040555350; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 10:55:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sting-ray.optiplex-networks.com (81-178-2-118.dsl.pipex.com. [81.178.2.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e7sm16672732eep.2.2012.09.07.10.55.52 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 07 Sep 2012 10:55:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <504A3525.3030208@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:55:49 +0100 From: Kaya Saman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: FreeBSD in finance sector X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:55:56 -0000 Hi, Does anyone know of any financial firms or banks that run FreeBSD? I have been instructed to research this for the firm I work at as I am trying to get the senior management to switch over from Linux as our current network is in shambles. Thanks for any responses. Regards, Kaya From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 18:13:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FC1106564A for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:13:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Dave.Robison@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1F18FC08 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.16]) by ltcfislmsgpa05.fnfis.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q87IDBNX030214 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:13:11 -0500 Received: from lefty.vicor.com (10.14.152.53) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:13:11 -0500 Message-ID: <504A3935.6010904@fisglobal.com> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:13:09 -0700 From: "Robison, Dave" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120209 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <504A3525.3030208@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <504A3525.3030208@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.53] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-09-07_07:2012-09-06, 2012-09-07, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 Subject: Re: FreeBSD in finance sector X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: david.robison@fisglobal.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:13:19 -0000 On 09/07/2012 10:55, Kaya Saman wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know of any financial firms or banks that run FreeBSD? > We use FreeBSD for our lockbox/remittance processing system. We have non-disclosure agreements which prevent me from mentioning bank names, but the most prominent players use our system running FreeBSD. Last year our systems processed well over 1.6 trillion dollars in financial transactions. We do have a few smaller systems running Linux, however all but a fairly negligible amount of that dollar total was processed by systems running FreeBSD. Dave -- Dave Robison Sales Solution Architect II FIS Banking Solutions 510/621-2089 (w) 530/518-5194 (c) 510/621-2020 (f) daver@vicor.com david.robison@fisglobal.com _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 18:17:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3732E1065701 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:17:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6B28FC0A for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:17:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-63-5.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.63.5]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74452279B2; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:17:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q87IHKZ3002002; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:17:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:17:20 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Kaya Saman Message-Id: <20120907201720.d77ef994.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <504A3525.3030208@gmail.com> References: <504A3525.3030208@gmail.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD in finance sector X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:17:22 -0000 On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:55:49 +0100, Kaya Saman wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know of any financial firms or banks that run FreeBSD? > > I have been instructed to research this for the firm I work at as I am > trying to get the senior management to switch over from Linux as our > current network is in shambles. There is a good chance that networking equipment they use (e. g. firewalls, routers, gateways, encryption appliances) run FreeBSD internally, or a system derived from it and turned into closed source (which the BSD license explicitely allows). Probably you won't have a chance to verify this. For running actual services (not sure _what_ you are running), FreeBSD might be as good as Linux, maybe even better. It can also serve as storage solution or networking subsystem for various kinds of "client OSes". Probably banks won't tell you what they run. Some run IBM mainframe systems (which you can "recognize" when looking at screens you're not supposed to look at). Any information more precise than just my assumptions can only be provided by insiders or service contractors who know the actual infrastructures. Banks and financial firms tend to _not_ publish what they run. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 18:34:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8CC106566B for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:34:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kayasaman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2682C8FC0C for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:34:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaak11 with SMTP id k11so1147775eaa.13 for ; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:34:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UeT90tL2Q88q2FFaEDesLobwMoOAYG2uo0oMLRqqLcg=; b=B6J/nlUGG7q3hGpnHszmbzRH7PGe28YRxMcQLF8YOSpgOuwgCu6hm1emokh6i3Ya+S HSjb6dKPkXEMcWHh9N29cy3qJYyrkIW2UBtojMA4EktqZ6CVPSqqx9rkIUH57/zIShLP rkyxOXFaZrSKx6zJ+huDFmjRVpjEjdPtsbLiAf1xcKXHl95K5U1gjNgltju8ygbPp3ap Jw6skamcpmOIPbMM7G+TS6OJGKWUe5Lcs8BjA7I3MwKYhi16uU5PLuhT40pXoHyo3gL9 xEaDs37QlrydKjn1mI8yYg+HDspZTepDmViUDTnagZg+iRVeM4Ry3GdJgeNHkvS3g18o j/tA== Received: by 10.14.184.133 with SMTP id s5mr9481098eem.31.1347042879092; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:34:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sting-ray.optiplex-networks.com (81-178-2-118.dsl.pipex.com. [81.178.2.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h2sm16916650eeo.3.2012.09.07.11.34.34 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:34:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <504A3E37.5080702@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:34:31 +0100 From: Kaya Saman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <504A3525.3030208@gmail.com> <20120907201720.d77ef994.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120907201720.d77ef994.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD in finance sector X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:34:40 -0000 On 09/07/2012 07:17 PM, Polytropon wrote: > On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:55:49 +0100, Kaya Saman wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Does anyone know of any financial firms or banks that run FreeBSD? >> >> I have been instructed to research this for the firm I work at as I am >> trying to get the senior management to switch over from Linux as our >> current network is in shambles. > There is a good chance that networking equipment they use > (e. g. firewalls, routers, gateways, encryption appliances) > run FreeBSD internally, or a system derived from it and > turned into closed source (which the BSD license explicitely > allows). Probably you won't have a chance to verify this. > > For running actual services (not sure _what_ you are running), > FreeBSD might be as good as Linux, maybe even better. It can > also serve as storage solution or networking subsystem for > various kinds of "client OSes". > > Probably banks won't tell you what they run. Some run IBM > mainframe systems (which you can "recognize" when looking > at screens you're not supposed to look at). Any information > more precise than just my assumptions can only be provided > by insiders or service contractors who know the actual > infrastructures. Banks and financial firms tend to _not_ > publish what they run. > > > > Thanks for the response! I agree and understand this, hence I am not allowed to give away details of where I work etc.... but I can state that we are using an aging Linux (CentOS) based architecture for our systems and as the new boy in town have made a big campaign to run a mixture of FreeBSD and Sun SPARC systems as AIX seems to be a big pain in the assets to admin. Regards, Kaya From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 18:46:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1571065673 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:46:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lokadamus@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC4298FC16 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:46:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Sep 2012 18:46:57 -0000 Received: from d019190.adsl.hansenet.de (EHLO FBSD.lokilan) [80.171.19.190] by mail.gmx.net (mp069) with SMTP; 07 Sep 2012 20:46:57 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3333826 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX191gLl/NHB1QPuQLeTAG2AxDC8KP+AW9h4HQ2UJs2 nx22YgBuJHwNFD Message-ID: <504A4125.3000006@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:47:01 +0200 From: "lokadamus@gmx.de" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120505 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxim Galkin References: <1346962497.808672791@f179.mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <1346962497.808672791@f179.mail.ru> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cant find snmptrapd.conf file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:46:59 -0000 Have you search with "find / -iname "snmptrap.conf"? Most example config files are under /usr/share/ or /usr/local/share. Else build a new one and test it. Set something, that is easy to test and look. On 09/06/12 22:14, Maxim Galkin wrote: > Where is the configuration file for snmptrapd? > > I'm using net-snmp-5.7.1_7. > and succesfully starting snmpd and snmptrapd. > > But there is only a config snmpd.conf ! > > Why can not I find a file snmptrapd.conf referred in man? > Where do I register my "traphandlers"? > > Help guys > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 19:25:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F06E106564A for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:25:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CA18FC08 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TA4BH-000498-FE for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 21:25:31 +0200 Received: from 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 21:25:31 +0200 Received: from jb.1234abcd by 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 21:25:31 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jb Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 4 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0) Subject: Clang'ed FreeBSD: Builds Quicker, Uses Way Less RAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:25:33 -0000 Good news on clang front: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTE3NjI jb From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 19:31:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E4F106566C for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markham_breitbach@ssimicro.com) Received: from mail.ssimicro.com (mail.ssimicro.com [64.247.129.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55CF8FC08 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:31:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from markham.ssimicro.com (markham.ssimicro.com [64.247.130.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.ssimicro.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q87JOxWw010446 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:24:59 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <504A4A0B.10908@ssimicro.com> Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 13:24:59 -0600 From: markham breitbach User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: gpart and mbr give "no operating system" message at boot. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:31:07 -0000 I am trying to partition a disk to be used as the primary boot disk for a FreeBSD 8.3 installation using gpart to install an MBR partition. The system is an existing FreeBSD 5.2.1 system at a remote location (ie impossible to boot from CD/netboot/etc), but has no data of value. To do this I am copying /boot and mfsroot.gz from an mfsbsd iso image to boot to an MFS live system so I can wipe the drive and do a clean install of 8.3. After booting to the MFS I do this: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad2 bs=1m count=1 gpart create -s mbr ad2 gpart add -b63 -t freebsd ad2 gpart create -s bsd ad2s1 gpart add -i1 -s 1g -t freebsd-ufs ad2s1 gpart add -i2 -s 1g -t freebsd-swap ad2s1 gpart add -i4 -s 2g -t freebsd-ufs ad2s1 gpart add -i5 -s 1g -t freebsd-ufs ad2s1 gpart add -i6 -t freebsd-ufs ad2s1 gpart set -a active -i 1 ad2 gpart bootcode -b /boot/mbr ad2 newfs /dev/ad2s1a newfs -U /dev/ad2s1d newfs -U /dev/ad2s1e newfs -U /dev/ad2s1f followed by a sysinstall and some configuration. When I reboot I get a message that says "Operating system not found" and the system hangs. If I follow the same procedure but create a gpt partition it works swimmingly. I am OK with using a gpt partition if needed, but for the sake of curiosity I would like to know why I can't make the MBR partition partition work. Am I missing something? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 20:48:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50439106566C for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:48:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0878FC14 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:48:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q87Km5hQ039271; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:48:05 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q87Km4bw039268; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:48:05 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:48:04 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: markham breitbach In-Reply-To: <504A4A0B.10908@ssimicro.com> Message-ID: References: <504A4A0B.10908@ssimicro.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:48:05 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gpart and mbr give "no operating system" message at boot. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:48:06 -0000 On Fri, 7 Sep 2012, markham breitbach wrote: > I am trying to partition a disk to be used as the primary boot disk for a FreeBSD 8.3 > installation using gpart to install an MBR partition. > > The system is an existing FreeBSD 5.2.1 system at a remote location (ie impossible to boot > from CD/netboot/etc), but has no data of value. To do this I am copying /boot and > mfsroot.gz from an mfsbsd iso image to boot to an MFS live system so I can wipe the drive > and do a clean install of 8.3. After booting to the MFS I do this: > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad2 bs=1m count=1 > gpart create -s mbr ad2 > gpart add -b63 -t freebsd ad2 > gpart create -s bsd ad2s1 > gpart add -i1 -s 1g -t freebsd-ufs ad2s1 > gpart add -i2 -s 1g -t freebsd-swap ad2s1 > gpart add -i4 -s 2g -t freebsd-ufs ad2s1 > gpart add -i5 -s 1g -t freebsd-ufs ad2s1 > gpart add -i6 -t freebsd-ufs ad2s1 > gpart set -a active -i 1 ad2 > gpart bootcode -b /boot/mbr ad2 > newfs /dev/ad2s1a > newfs -U /dev/ad2s1d > newfs -U /dev/ad2s1e > newfs -U /dev/ad2s1f > > followed by a sysinstall and some configuration. When I reboot I get a message that says > "Operating system not found" and the system hangs. > > If I follow the same procedure but create a gpt partition it works swimmingly. I am OK > with using a gpt partition if needed, but for the sake of curiosity I would like to know > why I can't make the MBR partition partition work. Am I missing something? Need to install bootcode to the slice also: # gpart bootcode -b /boot/boot ad2s1 Why are you skipping partition 3? For that matter, don't give partition numbers when adding, and gpart will just use the next available. If GPT works, there is little reason to use MBR. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 21:10:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF996106566C for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 21:10:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrisneudorf@yahoo.ca) Received: from nm38-vm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm38-vm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.229.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 857668FC16 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 21:10:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.138.90.54] by nm38.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Sep 2012 21:10:09 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.168] by tm7.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Sep 2012 21:10:09 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1024.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Sep 2012 21:10:09 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 706509.32025.bm@omp1024.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 4064 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Sep 2012 21:10:09 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.ca; s=s1024; t=1347052209; bh=Rd5n698sT9IIP/zaWkA93QeXvSQqkvYC1j2W/KaU23E=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CLUia8X8Ti4etiDnNbUmL56Ty6GEPaouzuKR2jQQsCf9+wsq9rX9+pDzUsmhvv1NNF5g9/uAa0Pv6hVJ02X6mdF6STUICybFPscbctGUpTawhMml/T4CWfbADZaGLzZc/W0JoNmueKEQtKMu4f4W2d3vyOKL3ZTj+yfxktggmJQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=v7luQMmWMo7AWoYb74nJDMG+dITg+cvcKD9hogDqbGc5Mcc2WURB0xdUvBC0dwRTG/hKHR1tcUiabTzqQ7HH85NlTrbheAldGb4NSlkDOmJvwv6EbLyZf9gwTmJDCmCJZi2sUQzBq9OB+H/GVckpIAAF7HA6Vo6+Gbk27d+hF/g=; X-YMail-OSG: UBmaMsUVM1mFzS8z9o2B4zkgXxLM_y4klcwk5gkyxbpV.LA wxjncqcPucVZ6NCtsjF_1eqk.7B7Eg2.7vdiXuXMCFLgLl8oHz_aiObmJVtq m6kl4aiRokUCiDYaTUtKBOsC465x_DcihdkbE9XqI8YnxBRgX_aMlAheHjtC 8qQXFzJm9ES16o8I.vNxz7tyMtuSFOMb.zfgECmJkSAAiHGpMCe.MuLeruWI V1fxw8.SV3rp298h5kzM95z3nYEKZzQPP2wvDLfy5OZNLjb3dIgBp9F7vs5z bZP82b9ymTyzGPv0.u8x0HzAyS_HE5hMK8WENb2.42Bz2qOwSm6S8lRD64P_ dm6Zten345e3szl4mIFwnovBOkI9osTfdSfqhCIw3OGZsyaDOa89aR7IHHwt 6x62aXQzu6zcvCJmtD1m0P7uqDups2kHvvbRAsRgtQitM08sNrqP7eOjfYcy b04r_rY5tylCbuegg5njAE9BB Received: from [70.66.153.188] by web120802.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:10:09 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.121.416 Message-ID: <1347052209.49230.YahooMailNeo@web120802.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:10:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Neudorf To: "questions@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD Install Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Chris Neudorf List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 21:10:15 -0000 Hello,=0A=0AI have a problem installing FreeBSD 9.0 Releaseon my Lenovo Thi= nkpad R61i laptop (4GB RAM, 160GB HDD, 32-bit). It doesn't matter if I trie= d installing it from the CD or the DVD, I still have the same problem. I ev= en tried re-downloading and re-burning a new CD or DVD, and I'm still unabl= e to install. I even have problems going through the "sysinstall" route.=0A= =0A=0AIn the installation process, I'm able to go far to the partitioning a= rea in where the problem occurs. I click for "Guided" partitioning and then= I receive this "Abort" message:=0A=0AAbort=0A------=0A=0AAn installation s= tep has been aborted. Would you like to restart the installation or exit th= e installer?=0A=0A---------------------------------------------------------= ------------------------------------------=0A[ Restart ] =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 [ Exit ]=0A=0A---------= ----------------------------=0A=0AWhen I click restart I end up with the sa= me result, and I end up in a neverending cycle of unable to install.=0A=0A= =0A(I even have a the same problem installing from GhostBSD.) =0A=0A=0A=0AI= s there any remedies to this problem? =0A=0A=0AThank you so much,=0A=0A--Ch= ristopher From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 21:38:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B163C1065672 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 21:38:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lokadamus@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 091BA8FC0C for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 21:38:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Sep 2012 21:37:55 -0000 Received: from d134093.adsl.hansenet.de (EHLO FBSD.lokilan) [80.171.134.93] by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 07 Sep 2012 23:37:55 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3333826 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/IvudC7vzI7lqdMJMbCNtMEUr55bFnUpdgqlkv5o y1W+JLXhIhYjjT Message-ID: <504A6937.3040805@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 23:37:59 +0200 From: "lokadamus@gmx.de" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120505 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Neudorf References: <1347052209.49230.YahooMailNeo@web120802.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1347052209.49230.YahooMailNeo@web120802.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: FreeBSD Install Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 21:38:03 -0000 On 09/07/12 23:10, Chris Neudorf wrote: > An installation step has been aborted. Would you like to restart the installation or exit the installer? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > [ Restart ] [ Exit ] > > ------------------------------------- > > When I click restart I end up with the same result, and I end up in a neverending cycle of unable to install. > > > (I even have a the same problem installing from GhostBSD.) > Is there any remedies to this problem? In Bios is legacy support for sata enable? On some systems this is a problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 23:00:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F3AA1065675 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 23:00:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markham_breitbach@ssimicro.com) Received: from mail.ssimicro.com (mail.ssimicro.com [64.247.129.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50918FC1A for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 23:00:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from markham.ssimicro.com (markham.ssimicro.com [64.247.130.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.ssimicro.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q87N0OZK033910 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:00:24 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <504A7C88.3090201@ssimicro.com> Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:00:24 -0600 From: markham breitbach User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <504A4A0B.10908@ssimicro.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: gpart and mbr give "no operating system" message at boot. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 23:00:26 -0000 Thanks Warren! I was always under the impression that partition 3 was not to be touched as the "raw" partition, so figured it was best left alone. I was mostly concerned with installing MBR so it would still be compatible with sysinstall, although I can't really think of a terribly good reason not to go GPT. Installing the bootcode gets me a step closer, but is now puking at the loader. I'm not sure if this is because the bootcode is coming from and 8.1 install, but at this point I'm pretty much out of time and out of patience for this, since it is something of a bandaid situation anyway. On 12-09-07 2:48 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Fri, 7 Sep 2012, markham breitbach wrote: > >> I am trying to partition a disk to be used as the primary boot disk for a FreeBSD 8.3 >> installation using gpart to install an MBR partition. >> >> The system is an existing FreeBSD 5.2.1 system at a remote location (ie impossible to boot >> from CD/netboot/etc), but has no data of value. To do this I am copying /boot and >> mfsroot.gz from an mfsbsd iso image to boot to an MFS live system so I can wipe the drive >> and do a clean install of 8.3. After booting to the MFS I do this: >> >> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad2 bs=1m count=1 >> gpart create -s mbr ad2 >> gpart add -b63 -t freebsd ad2 >> gpart create -s bsd ad2s1 >> gpart add -i1 -s 1g -t freebsd-ufs ad2s1 >> gpart add -i2 -s 1g -t freebsd-swap ad2s1 >> gpart add -i4 -s 2g -t freebsd-ufs ad2s1 >> gpart add -i5 -s 1g -t freebsd-ufs ad2s1 >> gpart add -i6 -t freebsd-ufs ad2s1 >> gpart set -a active -i 1 ad2 >> gpart bootcode -b /boot/mbr ad2 >> newfs /dev/ad2s1a >> newfs -U /dev/ad2s1d >> newfs -U /dev/ad2s1e >> newfs -U /dev/ad2s1f >> >> followed by a sysinstall and some configuration. When I reboot I get a message that says >> "Operating system not found" and the system hangs. >> >> If I follow the same procedure but create a gpt partition it works swimmingly. I am OK >> with using a gpt partition if needed, but for the sake of curiosity I would like to know >> why I can't make the MBR partition partition work. Am I missing something? > > Need to install bootcode to the slice also: > > # gpart bootcode -b /boot/boot ad2s1 > > Why are you skipping partition 3? For that matter, don't give partition numbers when > adding, and gpart will just use the next available. > > If GPT works, there is little reason to use MBR. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 23:16:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D548106566B for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 23:16:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE208FC12 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 23:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-63-5.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.63.5]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953F927CF0; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 01:16:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q87NG3SC002982; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 01:16:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 01:16:03 +0200 From: Polytropon To: markham breitbach Message-Id: <20120908011603.e75c852d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <504A7C88.3090201@ssimicro.com> References: <504A4A0B.10908@ssimicro.com> <504A7C88.3090201@ssimicro.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gpart and mbr give "no operating system" message at boot. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 23:16:07 -0000 On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:00:24 -0600, markham breitbach wrote: > I was always under the impression that partition 3 was not to be touched as the "raw" > partition, so figured it was best left alone. No, that is regarding traditional partitioning. But it's not the 3rd partition, it's the 'c' partition, which means nothing more or less than "the whole device" or "the whole slice". In today's FreeBSD /dev representation, the 'c' is left out, e. g. /dev/ad0c = /dev/ad0, and /dev/da3s2c = /dev/da3s2. For GPT partitions, that doesn't matter. It's only relevant for the kind of partitions disklabel (bsdlabel) creates inside a slice or directly on the device. Reserved names (or those with special purpose) are 'a' for a bootable partition, 'b' for a swap partition and 'c' for "the whole slice or disk". I think even 'd' has had a special meaning, but I didn't encounter it yet, even though I'm using FreeBSD since 4.0. :-) Partitions created with the gpart / gpt tools usually use e. g. /dev/ad0p1 and so on for partitioning, if I remember correctly. Additionally, I typically point to http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/disksetup.html to encourage the use of labels, because that lets you leave devices names alone. More information can be found here: http://www.daemonforums.org/showthread.php?t=2666 http://www.freebsdonline.com/content/view/731/506/ http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html And also http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-glabel.html regarding labels (GEOM labels, UFS labels, UFSIDs). > I was mostly concerned with installing MBR so it would still be compatible with > sysinstall, although I can't really think of a terribly good reason not to go GPT. Maybe that is significant only on older hardware where you intendedly want to preserve the "traditional" approach of MBR partitioning, maybe to keep compatibility with other systems that have trouble with GPT layouts. > Installing the bootcode gets me a step closer, but is now puking at the loader. I'm not > sure if this is because the bootcode is coming from and 8.1 install, but at this point I'm > pretty much out of time and out of patience for this, since it is something of a bandaid > situation anyway. The version number should not be the problem. It's only important that the boot elements installed refer to the layout that is present on disk correctly. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 8 00:19:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03C4106566C for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 00:19:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7815D8FC14 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 00:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.15]) by ltcfislmsgpa03.fnfis.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q880JHMn028991 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:19:17 -0500 Received: from dtwin (10.14.152.63) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:19:16 -0500 From: Sender: Devin Teske To: "'Chris Neudorf'" , References: <1347052209.49230.YahooMailNeo@web120802.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1347052209.49230.YahooMailNeo@web120802.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:19:31 -0700 Message-ID: <12ed01cd8d57$9e37a350$daa6e9f0$@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQMxKC893dZ6/Hqb0kL1RmmBsfKl/5S4XkJA Content-Language: en-us X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.63] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-09-07_07:2012-09-06, 2012-09-07, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: Subject: RE: FreeBSD Install Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 00:19:19 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chris Neudorf > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 2:10 PM > To: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: FreeBSD Install Problem >=20 > Hello, >=20 > I have a problem installing FreeBSD 9.0 Releaseon my Lenovo Thinkpad R61i > laptop (4GB RAM, 160GB HDD, 32-bit). It doesn't matter if I tried install= ing it from > the CD or the DVD, I still have the same problem. I even tried re-downloa= ding and > re-burning a new CD or DVD, and I'm still unable to install. I even have problems > going through the "sysinstall" route. >=20 Can you try the following? http://sourceforge.net/projects/druidbsd/files/FreeBSD-9.0_Druid-1.0b57.iso= /down load NOTE: New version posted just a couple days ago (but not announced yet; in-progress). --=20 Devin >=20 > In the installation process, I'm able to go far to the partitioning area = in where the > problem occurs. I click for "Guided" partitioning and then I receive this "Abort" > message: >=20 > Abort > ------ >=20 > An installation step has been aborted. Would you like to restart the installation or > exit the installer? >=20 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- ------------------- > [ Restart ] =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0 [ Exit ] >=20 > ------------------------------------- >=20 > When I click restart I end up with the same result, and I end up in a neverending > cycle of unable to install. >=20 >=20 > (I even have a the same problem installing from GhostBSD.) >=20 >=20 >=20 > Is there any remedies to this problem? >=20 >=20 > Thank you so much, >=20 > --Christopher > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 8 06:46:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7479106566B; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 06:46:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dalescott@shaw.ca) Received: from idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca (idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765668FC0C; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 06:46:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pd4ml1so-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.141.141]) by pd2mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 08 Sep 2012 00:46:47 -0600 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=zu4PKjlF+9DoPrG/TPTQ4CC8dREy1gI1uGhqrRhVwqE= c=1 sm=1 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=s1lrx0EV61IYYNPiyc1Uww==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=FP58Ms26AAAA:8 a=zXUqxrEgyMCzYb54sqkA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=8w8f3t8Vscu53cfd:21 a=IwSKaFHoLJXfJE4d:21 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Received: from unknown (HELO dalet61) ([70.73.37.138]) by pd4ml1so-dmz.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 08 Sep 2012 00:46:46 -0600 From: "Dale Scott" To: , "'Chris Neudorf'" , References: <1347052209.49230.YahooMailNeo@web120802.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <12ed01cd8d57$9e37a350$daa6e9f0$@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <12ed01cd8d57$9e37a350$daa6e9f0$@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 00:46:47 -0600 Message-ID: <001c01cd8d8d$b79e4340$26dac9c0$@shaw.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQMxKC893dZ6/Hqb0kL1RmmBsfKl/wJHfQVtlKaOqCA= Content-Language: en-us Cc: Subject: RE: FreeBSD Install Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 06:46:54 -0000 Check the SATA drive mode in the BIOS. It may need to be set to "Compatibility" (or vice versa). -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of = dteske@freebsd.org Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 6:20 PM To: 'Chris Neudorf'; questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD Install Problem > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-=20 > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chris Neudorf > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 2:10 PM > To: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: FreeBSD Install Problem >=20 > Hello, >=20 > I have a problem installing FreeBSD 9.0 Releaseon my Lenovo Thinkpad=20 > R61i laptop (4GB RAM, 160GB HDD, 32-bit). It doesn't matter if I tried = > installing it from > the CD or the DVD, I still have the same problem. I even tried=20 > re-downloading and > re-burning a new CD or DVD, and I'm still unable to install. I even=20 > have problems > going through the "sysinstall" route. >=20 Can you try the following? http://sourceforge.net/projects/druidbsd/files/FreeBSD-9.0_Druid-1.0b57.i= so/ down load NOTE: New version posted just a couple days ago (but not announced yet; in-progress). -- Devin >=20 > In the installation process, I'm able to go far to the partitioning = area in where the > problem occurs. I click for "Guided" partitioning and then I receive = this "Abort" > message: >=20 > Abort > ------ >=20 > An installation step has been aborted. Would you like to restart the installation or > exit the installer? >=20 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- ---- ------------------- > [ Restart ] = =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 [ = Exit ] >=20 > ------------------------------------- >=20 > When I click restart I end up with the same result, and I end up in a neverending > cycle of unable to install. >=20 >=20 > (I even have a the same problem installing from GhostBSD.) >=20 >=20 >=20 > Is there any remedies to this problem? >=20 >=20 > Thank you so much, >=20 > --Christopher > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete = the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the = message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, = please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to = archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 8 07:40:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34EF2106564A; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 07:40:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51838FC17; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 07:40:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.31]) by ltcfislmsgpa05.fnfis.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q887ehnD007798 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 8 Sep 2012 02:40:43 -0500 Received: from [10.0.0.100] (10.14.152.61) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 02:40:42 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" From: Devin Teske In-Reply-To: <001c01cd8d8d$b79e4340$26dac9c0$@shaw.ca> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 00:40:40 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <9281CDA7-AE46-4B2D-B690-5C2B40AC998A@fisglobal.com> References: <1347052209.49230.YahooMailNeo@web120802.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <12ed01cd8d57$9e37a350$daa6e9f0$@freebsd.org> <001c01cd8d8d$b79e4340$26dac9c0$@shaw.ca> To: Dale Scott X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.61] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-09-08_01:2012-09-06, 2012-09-08, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: 'Chris Neudorf' , dteske@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Install Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 07:40:45 -0000 Not saying your suggestion won't work but=85 The last time I had to flip the SATA mode in a BIOS to Compatibility (somet= imes labeled "Legacy" or "IDE" mode) was when I was installing FreeBSD-4.11= on an Intel S5000PSL/R. I don't think I've come across a machine that required me to change the SAT= A mode before installing FreeBSD 9. The OP may have said he tried sysinstall approaches but unless he specifica= lly said he tried Druid, it actually implies he was comparing FreeBSD 8 med= ia to FreeBSD 9's. This is naturally not a fair fight because both install = media are using different kernels. That's why I recommend that you try a sysinstall based installer that's act= ually built from/for 9.0-RELEASE. It will boot with a 9.0 kernel and use sy= sinstall to automatically set up the system. Trying FreeBSD Druid will put the two installers (sysinstall v bsdinstall) = on the same ground using the same kernel, so we'll be able to tell if its y= our hardware or the installer. --=20 Devin On Sep 7, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Dale Scott wrote: > Check the SATA drive mode in the BIOS. It may need to be set to > "Compatibility" (or vice versa). >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of dteske@freebsd.= org > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 6:20 PM > To: 'Chris Neudorf'; questions@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: FreeBSD Install Problem >=20 >=20 >=20 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-=20 >> questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chris Neudorf >> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 2:10 PM >> To: questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: FreeBSD Install Problem >>=20 >> Hello, >>=20 >> I have a problem installing FreeBSD 9.0 Releaseon my Lenovo Thinkpad=20 >> R61i laptop (4GB RAM, 160GB HDD, 32-bit). It doesn't matter if I tried= =20 >> installing > it from >> the CD or the DVD, I still have the same problem. I even tried=20 >> re-downloading > and >> re-burning a new CD or DVD, and I'm still unable to install. I even=20 >> have > problems >> going through the "sysinstall" route. >>=20 >=20 > Can you try the following? >=20 > http://sourceforge.net/projects/druidbsd/files/FreeBSD-9.0_Druid-1.0b57.i= so/ > down > load >=20 > NOTE: New version posted just a couple days ago (but not announced yet; > in-progress). > -- > Devin >=20 >=20 >>=20 >> In the installation process, I'm able to go far to the partitioning area > in > where the >> problem occurs. I click for "Guided" partitioning and then I receive this > "Abort" >> message: >>=20 >> Abort >> ------ >>=20 >> An installation step has been aborted. Would you like to restart the > installation or >> exit the installer? >>=20 >>=20 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- > ---- > ------------------- >> [ Restart ] [ Exit ] >>=20 >> ------------------------------------- >>=20 >> When I click restart I end up with the same result, and I end up in a > neverending >> cycle of unable to install. >>=20 >>=20 >> (I even have a the same problem installing from GhostBSD.) >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Is there any remedies to this problem? >>=20 >>=20 >> Thank you so much, >>=20 >> --Christopher >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 > _____________ > The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or > confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete t= he > message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the messa= ge > in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, plea= se > be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving > and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >=20 _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 8 15:15:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0395A106566C for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 15:15:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kia00000@rambler.ru) Received: from mx-out-wr-2.rambler.ru (mx-out-wr-2.rambler.ru [81.19.92.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E37D8FC14 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 15:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from saddam3.rambler.ru (saddam3.rambler.ru [10.32.16.3]) by mx-out-wr-2.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DCD7E26E8 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:08:25 +0400 (MSK) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saddam3.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id A115425620D for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:08:25 +0400 (MSK) Received: from [213.87.130.237] by saddam3.rambler.ru with HTTP; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:08:25 +0400 From: =?koi8-r?B?ydfBziDL1drOxcPP1w==?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:08:25 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Message-Id: <1347116905.578461.8570.23750@saddam3.rambler.ru> X-Mailer: Rambler WebMail, http://mail.rambler.ru/ X-Rambler-User: kia00000@rambler.ru/213.87.130.237 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rambler.ru; s=dkim; t=1347116905; bh=79dnXbOPirBg2AJgRvBiIDy1fiEbnGWpiIJNByJvhks=; h=From:To:Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Message-Id; b=55geU5m8H/mPilu2azCTmA1vbLl3W7Au48yiry2tNbwmQRd5wNLEjEYdWxhcXtQcY Ho/HDT1M79Ybs6JpC6R6l3sc6LJNe/esvArspY99t7TfsinNqsyw/MGCQ2Og4C+Btt AlH5+blKYhRfIQInBbm9tLAg1r7tTTl7PoKW8Z94= X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 15:20:25 +0000 Subject: ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?koi8-r?B?ydfBziDL1drOxcPP1w==?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 15:15:07 -0000 =0D i was download 135g distfiles from russian mirror on usb hdd, and i have no= room on laptop for this files.how to setup apps from it,how to build pbi f= iles? i was read some articles but i cant.=0D =0D =0D =D0=B8=D0=B2=D0=B0=D0=BD =D0=BA=D1=83=D0=B7=D0=BD=D0=B5=D1=86=D0=BE=D0=B2.= =0D > =0D From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 8 15:34:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4278F1065670 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 15:34:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corebug@corebug.net) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC03E8FC0C for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 15:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so1108158vbm.13 for ; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 08:34:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=B8uRFNPIXyUKqstwcaXrOPaYzcRRPk6oA9mDZNmnnaM=; b=Cr8+hvOiBTcEgX/kmqP8t9EjVB2T+teRtecat+7aHvhU9nH108q9soC9tksXK8FImy Rsx3gthV+dNtG9PTPp7UjWHllFyrkf/6uCx2ktkl9HYTbHoTPttK+5e7IXgvU91W/Fty GomJQESTtF/0UdcJ2ctkY2bs7BU1T/JWvYZEUZkyExevXHk9ead/C+BWyoJTrac5RX1W vKcqPXGx7tuU6mv2twJrhIdmvW5PXnq6egyHXExwrZzGFSxtuqm+iacmzH9KziNPCtm+ ngr7b92ZsLyMgfBDOFvFmH0vGV53XsooclvV8v1pvqPl8hY6gHSgm41fEey4pITsinvj oUYQ== Received: by 10.58.74.196 with SMTP id w4mr12502374vev.7.1347118448994; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 08:34:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.249.138 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 08:33:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [176.113.162.13] In-Reply-To: <1347116905.578461.8570.23750@saddam3.rambler.ru> References: <1347116905.578461.8570.23750@saddam3.rambler.ru> From: =?KOI8-R?B?98nUwczJyiD01dLP18XD?= Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 18:33:48 +0300 Message-ID: To: =?KOI8-R?B?ydfBziDL1drOxcPP1w==?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkViJ6ahbtc9tRvrYSfYSA1LK17UuJr44bUQvwnyxzADApky5wDogtT5L1gwcCTZ5MAgKLi Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 15:34:10 -0000 2012/9/8 =C9=D7=C1=CE =CB=D5=DA=CE=C5=C3=CF=D7 : > > > > i was download 135g distfiles from russian mirror on usb hdd, and i have = no > room on laptop for this files.how to setup apps from it,how to build pbi > files? i was read some articles but i cant. > > > > > > =C9=D7=C1=CE =CB=D5=DA=CE=C5=C3=CF=D7. > >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" Well, basically, you can mount your usb HDD as distfiles directory under /usr/ports. That would be something like mount -t YOUR_USB_HDD_FILE_SYSTEM /dev/YOUR_USB_HDD /usr/ports/distfiles. Also note that not only distfiles are required, your ports tree must be in sync with distfiles directory (same versions, names and sizes/checksumms). Cheers. --=20 ~~~ WBR, Vitaliy Turovets Systems Administrator Corebug.Net +38(093)265-70-55 VITU-RIPE X-NCC-RegID: ua.tv From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 8 17:14:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2791106566C for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 17:14:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from x.it.okstate.edu (x.it.okstate.edu [139.78.2.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8928FC12 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 17:14:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by x.it.okstate.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q88HEXtY099872 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 12:14:33 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <201209081714.q88HEXtY099872@x.it.okstate.edu> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <99870.1347124473.1@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 12:14:33 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Is there anything like strace for 64-bit Systems? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 17:14:40 -0000 Is there anything like strace for AMD64 FreeBSD? Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 8 17:26:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A36106566C for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 17:26:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776DB8FC14 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 17:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDC4E6528; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 18:29:00 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=yAMljFUaavCZ S8AjMHrNDCx61ic=; b=yUIIrfawfTODOnPdBjw8SS5+8pNYSlCDRDlfNB9qEiPh ZavP9eKPaSfrzL6LREL3vDFd0wkggfc9BlDP8lMp5dt0eytVYLZ3mC3BIPEEpSJp E0IvmMK/vaSgVVwTybr3DBwh5dpV/nvbJo9p88iGZTq7hNcBKu3GUG7nns3qucc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=CHZtKP 7tlKJM87U+OxaD9Z5djwJ/7julYaufpN5a9GrDZHHthSKrXbBxOVnw/yJahT4nF3 gh2xp3kmUNLNNhnsg/hwuPpFFzPhKKtqO4Ydz+MVjpXCxvfhmLGIKoXWSn9Giaou rtvwFZvWGEM1A9kh8th460g4n0cmdWqoZCCmw= Received: from [IPv6:2a01:348:301:2:c5cf:192e:129:6d76] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:348:301:2:c5cf:192e:129:6d76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD3B9E6401; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 18:29:00 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <504B7FB1.8030306@cran.org.uk> Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 18:26:09 +0100 From: Bruce Cran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin McCormick References: <201209081714.q88HEXtY099872@x.it.okstate.edu> In-Reply-To: <201209081714.q88HEXtY099872@x.it.okstate.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there anything like strace for 64-bit Systems? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 17:26:17 -0000 On 08/09/2012 18:14, Martin McCormick wrote: > Is there anything like strace for AMD64 FreeBSD? See truss(1) - "trace system calls". -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 8 18:10:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E50106567D for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 18:10:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlopmart@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692418FC14 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 18:10:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eeke52 with SMTP id e52so343285eek.13 for ; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 11:10:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=26t1RhS6frjq9iuNMMERpMcDWKQo+Vf4UXT+KRZnXbU=; b=lWceVfHRlGVyiWjMph5coHhQj+4ZUmpvoO4pN5Dl/iUm0HhRdANRiIJmUvAy4fte3K YwtEeM935ld46jJwkNV0uLqlePJcBy2Tc5TrWyrW2don89YA1LPvDV8bGavDEPr/rzcS hroXYex8zZLHNg0nDRN9qlSLJQ+y6//isfPPzbXs+DTY2gihbYUnT32xQNZl+UCwL6ds SynPIyGtUW93vpiVbr7Co14aN0ejRIjWm/rYv8mTZ0g7GuCG6e7OkkmRncgqqM74dwJd QNRdM5eA/zTejbu5XMxx2wvhIJk4ylCInV7VKFXOOvx02BEMKJy3hCyK5zz+ceW9qtDf 3jXw== Received: by 10.14.223.9 with SMTP id u9mr12735264eep.10.1347127855555; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 11:10:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from silmaril.hpulabs.org (56.Red-83-46-142.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net. [83.46.142.56]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e7sm24024894eep.2.2012.09.08.11.10.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 08 Sep 2012 11:10:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <504B8A2B.6090007@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 20:10:51 +0200 From: carlopmart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111109 Red Hat/3.1.16-2.el6_1 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Binding IP adress to opensmtpd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 18:10:56 -0000 Hi all, I have installed opensmtpd on my FreeBSD 8.3. All works ok, except I can't bind smtpd to specific IP address ... In this box, I am using 3 ip aliases, but smtpd sends all emails using the first IP. Is it possible to configure this?? I have tried to fix with hostname option, without result ... Thanks, -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 8 18:16:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E43106564A for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 18:16:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@thorshammare.org) Received: from smtprelay-b12.telenor.se (smtprelay-b12.telenor.se [62.127.194.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5492D8FC15 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 18:16:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipb4.telenor.se (ipb4.telenor.se [195.54.127.167]) by smtprelay-b12.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899C2C08F for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 20:16:29 +0200 (CEST) X-SENDER-IP: [83.227.225.121] X-LISTENER: [smtp.bredband.net] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApuVAM2KS1BT4+F5PGdsb2JhbABFhUC1AwEBAgEBAoEGGQEBAQE3NIIiAgMBAQEFIBIMCAIGGAsHAgQEARg3GQ4BBQQIAwcVAQQIBwQBChIEh3MHsS2JBxSLGYJ9gx8DjWGFT4NBkXGBYQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,392,1344204000"; d="scan'208";a="111735553" Received: from ua-83-227-225-121.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO thor.thorshammare.org) ([83.227.225.121]) by ipb4.telenor.se with ESMTP; 08 Sep 2012 20:16:05 +0200 Received: from obah (obah.thorshammare.org [192.168.1.10]) by thor.thorshammare.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q88IG3n5014710; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 20:16:03 +0200 (CEST) From: "Martin McCormick" Sender: "fbsd" To: Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 20:15:59 +0200 Message-ID: <000101cd8dee$02c06af0$084140d0$@cis.okstate.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-ID: <99870.1347124473.1@dc.cis.okstate.edu> X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac2N5YFNsyOG8AESRlC5xnOkjrTAmg== Content-Language: sv X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.5 at mailhub3.thorshammare.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Is there anything like strace for 64-bit Systems? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 18:16:36 -0000 Is there anything like strace for AMD64 FreeBSD? Thank you. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 8 19:00:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7513E1065675 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:00:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3423B8FC12 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:00:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-63-5.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.63.5]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF2E3CA8D; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 21:00:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q88J0nkC002055; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 21:00:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 21:00:49 +0200 From: Polytropon To: =?UTF-8?B?0LjQstCw0L0g0LrRg9C30L3QtdGG0L7Qsg==?= Message-Id: <20120908210049.1dadfde2.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <1347116905.578461.8570.23750@saddam3.rambler.ru> References: <1347116905.578461.8570.23750@saddam3.rambler.ru> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 19:00:57 -0000 On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:08:25 +0400, иван кузнецов wrote: > > > i was download 135g distfiles from russian mirror on usb hdd, > and i have no room on laptop for this files.how to setup apps > from it,how to build pbi files? i was read some articles but i > cant. I assume it's better to ask PBI-related questions in PC-BSD's web forum as those are not exactly "native FreeBSD things". -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 8 22:20:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DC810656AD for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 22:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@x.it.okstate.edu) Received: from x.it.okstate.edu (x.it.okstate.edu [139.78.2.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C3A8FC15 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 22:20:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x.it.okstate.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by x.it.okstate.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q88MK9Vr001129 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 17:20:09 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@x.it.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <201209082220.q88MK9Vr001129@x.it.okstate.edu> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1127.1347142809.1@x.it.okstate.edu> Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 17:20:09 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Re: Is there anything like strace for 64-bit Systems? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 22:20:11 -0000 Bruce Cran writes I should try truss. I would just quote the text, but I need to first find out what is broken in the reply sequence and truss may point out what is failing. Martin McCormick