From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 01:30:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B71620D for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 01:30:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87ED38FC12 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 01:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.net (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBN1K9Eb078598; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 02:20:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6FCA112720; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 02:20:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 02:20:09 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Jack Mc Lauren Subject: Re: exclude directories from find command Message-ID: <20121223012009.GA11934@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: <1356186164.16227.YahooMailNeo@web160104.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1356186164.16227.YahooMailNeo@web160104.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: FreeBSD Global Users Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 01:30:33 -0000 --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 06:22:44AM -0800, Jack Mc Lauren wrote: > Hi fellas > How can I exclude specific directories from my find command ? I want to l= ook for all files in the whole system except for those in e.g /extra direct= ory.=A0 > I use this command to find all files, but how can I exclude /extra direct= ory ? >=20 > find / -type f Try this: find / -type f -not -path '/extra/*' Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlDWXEkACgkQEnfvsMMhpyW5tQCeIe/az8QhYB4PIrGmMdGxEGaF PcMAnRVZ3COHTFg5/DYtRA0s2YUY0Ogn =h/rf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 02:44:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91653994 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 02:44:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723C88FC14 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 02:44:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 22 Dec 2012 18:43:59 -0800 Message-ID: <50D66FEF.5040105@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 21:43:59 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: how to configure host login account to use jail? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Dec 2012 02:43:59.0944 (UTC) FILETIME=[5C848C80:01CDE0B7] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 02:44:04 -0000 Have jails up and running on host with ip address of 10.0.10.10 10.0.10.11 10.0.10.12 10.0.10.13 10.0.10.14 The host rc.conf has ifconfig_xl0="DHCP" # nix connected to isp ifconfig_rl0="inet 10.0.10.2" #lan nic I want lan users to login to their jail by ip address using ssh. How do I setup host user accounts so they login to their associated jail? Is this something I code in the host user account or is it done by the remote ssh login command? How do other jail users do this? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 04:50:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BDA34ED for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 04:50:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EF78FC0A for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 04:50:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hm11so5884760wib.2 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:50:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from :subject:date:to:x-gm-message-state; bh=uBg0wFESnM36uQQsYK6NbCRLmjeoyr2FkQQqFEm47m8=; b=pLWm4EjWyw3XpGGAoCc7eHxyfwOMDcOYY9IbtO55T8+waHlLLnWFHSoNlD9Dhify5D vIQxPoQCWP98yGAmzXZRBH+9b7EoEP+lusgl5V2DwV7YKBo35fmphF67H9ttRSGAq5r0 aUYhdewotuR/FkFZmrZJDYNh2w7iACFsLwF80f+iyyd/bVXiaojS3fIfCPjC+VvgSFvS 7h6yp/POnzPdbybZ/lZKBLLWLjZfnpHr3dBx3tefKZx+jew/EKmH2zBPqFZkhSMeNUiN Umsx7cuYw48TkgZ6QHLqwpbPl2ovdWeX9LXxOHDu8i9A9uXAKnsZrcDnq+2G/5WKeoq0 JKuQ== X-Received: by 10.180.39.143 with SMTP id p15mr29219510wik.14.1356238227548; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:50:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.41.113.160] ([92.90.16.94]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fv2sm37056995wib.4.2012.12.22.20.50.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:50:26 -0800 (PST) References: <50D66FEF.5040105@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <50D66FEF.5040105@a1poweruser.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <7B1B77F2-A104-4796-996B-DA5B8D448D54@my.gd> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9A405) From: Damien Fleuriot Subject: Re: how to configure host login account to use jail? Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 05:49:36 +0100 To: Fbsd8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkixmC5UmTfzK1KEX6GzfazfaZHEDWIdwBKJYXkH9iClIaMJw3f86+rH3EOoFIArQYm75U0 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 04:50:35 -0000 On 23 Dec 2012, at 03:43, Fbsd8 wrote: > Have jails up and running on host with ip address of > 10.0.10.10 10.0.10.11 10.0.10.12 10.0.10.13 10.0.10.14 > The host rc.conf has > ifconfig_xl0=3D"DHCP" # nix connected to isp > ifconfig_rl0=3D"inet 10.0.10.2" #lan nic >=20 > I want lan users to login to their jail by ip address using ssh. > How do I setup host user accounts so they login to > their associated jail? > Is this something I code in the host user account or is it done > by the remote ssh login command? >=20 > How do other jail users do this? >=20 I assign public IPs to my jails and let people SSH to them. Alternatively you could use non-22 ports and have PF rdr to your jail's inte= rnal IP. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 09:05:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A0A95E for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:05:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jack.mclauren@yahoo.com) Received: from nm17-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm17-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.213.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2948FC14 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:05:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.212.153] by nm17.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Dec 2012 09:05:35 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.203] by tm10.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Dec 2012 09:05:35 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1012.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Dec 2012 09:05:35 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 571571.63867.bm@omp1012.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 11803 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Dec 2012 09:05:35 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1356253535; bh=3oFGvvGMtZfV5yZg4D8s5nq4QRiJrQU/Nywg1oNPObE=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pt9ocBuwa0rTVTF4/qFxQ7yWeWSJwgjQFQ3ki7j/FO1XEjPlYVvIUR8Ecx8hihTLSJJS6KeLYqhURXBKI4EGA9+Nl5zpSRhTl4FQlioA7qaarHewo/AIIiJxCmEI0JNGPW+CijqBEBTLjb6ud2JrNaVGg76QomurhcpEz87CYf8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ld9VciqDBopJW20oytiGCYjUku20S8o+PbAqYDmvCTuwoqFJ/aVu8ldi0uOllmyOfZ2otzfg/1l+eiJU5w9YeFWO04Z1SV6Y4lK7bB9IuoPUpBn88IrBUwFa08mgoRsFI8Hu4IJmnQgQsr44iK9CHgoSPd5LhY0Ap6kcsreaPlQ=; X-YMail-OSG: Tl9vKKMVM1mUCXgdlHvdY1EfLT8u6LRlqGaC9Gk3q49tw97 xSmnRJCaAjOWckgxY2vAukt2rBp1EKQZYTGPwKBgJIfcN5x_r1q7AKkC4DKk 63eSJfEl0Jb2TzcpXh6kLdksTJvBC8N3wAPr1D4MfcCpbAfngi6lMtF1alW4 12JO3aJBqh_pow8w4_Q60w5JrDJwxowis4JCaGWTY1nBUhQCUCnhQebu9pO5 d6tMI_LjjIXD29rvG5QVuQHYhU3.vrVxLwa0pnQNGUdMc8j9N1SwViEKi.NL oBfJjAHbfB.kAa.6RF9.W.tsYPi.TiEtbbfKhqI2aQ16_5d_Yzgeh4TuGeaF .Ymn4gyw4OM9lmLsGHdtTThqTPUlPslFng2ftPvcBpWSK1kfyxTDDQ1j4X0d SmHeE3qempzuhHcc4dWQftdpQ6uq98ix8ywww7ikO76EREyqeKLRdeHU6C59 G Received: from [89.165.120.140] by web160101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 01:05:35 PST X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001, SGkgYWxsDQpQbGVhc2UgdGFrZSBhIGxvb2sgYXQgdGhlIHNjcmlwdCBiZWxvdyB3aWNoIEkndmUgd3JvdGUgOg0KMS0gY2F0IC9mb28vYmFyLnR4dCB8IHdoaWxlIHJlYWQgJExJTkUxMi0gZG8zLSDCoCDCoGNhdCAvZm9vL2Jhci9mb28vYmFyLnR4dCB8IHdoaWxlIHJlYWQgJExJTkUyNC0gwqAgwqBkb8KgNS0gwqAgwqAgwqAgwqAgaWYgWyAiJExJTkUxIiA9ICIkTElORTIiIF07IHRoZW42LSDCoCDCoCDCoCDCoCDCoCDCoCDCoCBzdz0iMSI3LSDCoCDCoCDCoCDCoCDCoCDCoCDCoCBlY2hvICJDdXJyZW50IHYBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/15.1.1 YahooMailWebService/0.8.129.483 Message-ID: <1356253535.76738.YahooMailClassic@web160101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 01:05:35 -0800 (PST) From: Jack Mc Lauren Subject: shell script problem To: FreeBSD Global Users Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:05:37 -0000 Hi all Please take a look at the script below wich I've wrote : 1- cat /foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE12- do3- =A0 =A0cat /foo/bar/foo/bar.= txt | while read $LINE24- =A0 =A0do=A05- =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 if [ "$LINE1" =3D = "$LINE2" ]; then6- =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 sw=3D"1"7- =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 echo "Current value of sw is : " $sw8- =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 break9- =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 fi10- =A0 =A0done11- =A0 =A0echo "Value of sw i= s : " $sw12- =A0 =A0if [ "$sw" =3D "0" ]; then13- =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 DO SOMETH= ING14- =A0 =A0fi15- =A0 =A0sw=3D"0"16- done =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 You probebly guessed what I want to do. But the problem is that when the va= lue of sw sets to 1 (in the first if statement) and the loop breaks , the v= alue of sw is not '1' anymore in " echo "Value of sw is : " $sw " !!! Thanks in advance ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 09:34:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A83BB94 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:34:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D248FC0A for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:34:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-94-87.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.94.87]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4FF276D5; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:34:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id qBN9YYFr002893; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:34:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:34:34 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Jack Mc Lauren Subject: Re: shell script problem Message-Id: <20121223103434.def7cd9c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <1356253535.76738.YahooMailClassic@web160101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <1356253535.76738.YahooMailClassic@web160101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Global Users Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:34:39 -0000 On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 01:05:35 -0800 (PST), Jack Mc Lauren wrote: > Hi all > Please take a look at the script below wich I've wrote : > 1- cat /foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE12- do3- =A0 =A0cat /foo/bar/foo/ba= r.txt | while read $LINE24- =A0 =A0do=A05- =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 if [ "$LINE1" = =3D "$LINE2" ]; then6- =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 sw=3D"1"7- =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 echo "Current value of sw is : " $sw8- =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 break9- =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 fi10- =A0 =A0done11- =A0 =A0echo "Value of = sw is : " $sw12- =A0 =A0if [ "$sw" =3D "0" ]; then13- =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 DO SO= METHING14- =A0 =A0fi15- =A0 =A0sw=3D"0"16- done =A0 =A0 This is totally distorted! Allow me to re-arrange it. cat /foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE1 do cat /foo/bar/foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE2 do if [ "$LINE1" =3D "$LINE2" ]; then sw=3D"1" echo "Current value of sw is : " $sw break fi done echo "Value of sw is : " $sw if [ "$sw" =3D "0" ]; then DO SOMETHING fi sw=3D"0" done First, the lines with "read" have to be: cat /foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE1 cat /foo/bar/foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE2 Reason: $LINE1 and $LINE2 will be evaluated here, they are "empty string", causing "read" to throw an error. =A0 =A0 =A0 > You probebly guessed what I want to do. But the problem is that > when the value of sw sets to 1 (in the first if statement) and > the loop breaks , the value of sw is not '1' anymore in > " echo "Value of sw is : " $sw " !!! > Thanks in advance ... For testing, I've replaced the $sw=3D0 line with an "echo" command. I've created two files foo.txt and bar.txt for test, both have one line in common (3rd line in my example data). If I run the script, I get this output: Value of sw is : <- after 1st line (uninitialized) Value of sw is : 0 <- after 2nd line DO SOMETHING! Current value of sw is : 1 <- after 3nd line (common entry) Value of sw is : 0 <- after 4th line DO SOMETHING! Value of sw is : 0 <- after 5th line DO SOMETHING! It seems that the condition $LINE1=3D$LINE2 properly triggers the "current value" echo command, while all non-common lines trigger the "DO SOMETHING" action. If you indended something else, please elaborate. --=20 Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 09:43:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE369C8F for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:43:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871588FC15 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:43:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-94-87.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.94.87]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73AA7276C9; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:43:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id qBN9hBBl002969; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:43:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:43:11 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Jack Mc Lauren Subject: Re: shell script problem Message-Id: <20121223104311.557f3752.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20121223103434.def7cd9c.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <1356253535.76738.YahooMailClassic@web160101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <20121223103434.def7cd9c.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Global Users Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:43:10 -0000 On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:34:34 +0100, Polytropon wrote: > First, the lines with "read" have to be: > > cat /foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE1 > > cat /foo/bar/foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE2 > > Reason: $LINE1 and $LINE2 will be evaluated here, they are "empty > string", causing "read" to throw an error. Excuse me - I made a mistake! Of course those two lines have to be: cat /foo/bar.txt | while read LINE1 and cat /foo/bar/foo/bar.txt | while read LINE2 The $ infront of the variable names have to be removed. The variable _name_, not its content, has to be provided to "read" as a parameter. The script so far: #!/bin/sh cat foo.txt | while read LINE1 do cat bar.txt | while read LINE2 do if [ "$LINE1" = "$LINE2" ]; then sw="1" echo "Current value of sw is : " $sw break fi done echo "Value of sw is : " $sw if [ "$sw" = "0" ]; then echo "DO SOMETHING!" fi sw="0" done -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 09:57:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C293CFB0 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:57:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C408FC15 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBN9vD9s041295 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:57:13 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk qBN9vD9s041295 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/qBN9vD9s041295; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Message-ID: <50D6D56E.8000401@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:57:02 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: shell script problem References: <1356253535.76738.YahooMailClassic@web160101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <20121223103434.def7cd9c.freebsd@edvax.de> <20121223104311.557f3752.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20121223104311.557f3752.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC124095A8B251B81FB2A37C7" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:57:27 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC124095A8B251B81FB2A37C7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 23/12/2012 09:43, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:34:34 +0100, Polytropon wrote: >> First, the lines with "read" have to be: >> >> cat /foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE1 >> >> cat /foo/bar/foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE2 >> >> Reason: $LINE1 and $LINE2 will be evaluated here, they are "empty >> string", causing "read" to throw an error. >=20 > Excuse me - I made a mistake! Of course those two lines > have to be: >=20 > cat /foo/bar.txt | while read LINE1 >=20 > and >=20 > cat /foo/bar/foo/bar.txt | while read LINE2 >=20 > The $ infront of the variable names have to be removed. > The variable _name_, not its content, has to be provided > to "read" as a parameter. >=20 > The script so far: >=20 >=20 >=20 > #!/bin/sh >=20 > cat foo.txt | while read LINE1 > do > cat bar.txt | while read LINE2 > do > if [ "$LINE1" =3D "$LINE2" ]; then > sw=3D"1" > echo "Current value of sw is : " $sw > break > fi > done > echo "Value of sw is : " $sw > if [ "$sw" =3D "0" ]; then > echo "DO SOMETHING!" > fi > sw=3D"0" > done >=20 >=20 Hmmm.... I'd just like to draw your attention to the comm(1) program, which lets you find lines common to two files, or only in one or other of a pair of inputs, very easily. The only slight gotcha is that the input files have to be sorted. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enigC124095A8B251B81FB2A37C7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDW1XgACgkQ8Mjk52CukIznsgCfeNgcDOOs3P6s0I4CHwIDxa/a XLMAniDdI2fw/aOgII/FUIkiAa4olr4j =cMR0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC124095A8B251B81FB2A37C7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 12:17:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6636EE8D for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:17:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward2h.mail.yandex.net (forward2h.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:f05::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0BCA8FC0C for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (smtp2h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.187.145]) by forward2h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 20AF0701321 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:17:50 +0400 (MSK) Received: from smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 00FF51700166 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:17:49 +0400 (MSK) Received: from unknown (unknown [77.93.52.20]) by smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id Hnn4OnkZ-Hnnqw2Eg; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:17:49 +0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1356265069; bh=9XsUaZYiIUJTnUhue3nAtSURi2ZJLEWidw0KoeDpuyk=; h=Date:From:X-Mailer:Reply-To:Organization:X-Priority:Message-ID:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=f7WQlFhKLH4K6yzSz9920Y2WRMtPj3bQkcx5uq7wjC+6jjAmot5riB/8mW1On7Kxm mqj1Ftj4eNm7dmSX6xz3ue5undHxM0wKSS7DzU+gvrTqA876v0895SN1TRlZvgDi62 /hs+kCRtHtFy2uKYYPALEm9RUT8JbdgRrWL/f2oQ= Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 14:17:47 +0200 From: Eugen Konkov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: ISP FreeLine X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <141032435.20121223141747@yandex.ru> To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: bind 192.168.1.1 to all interfaces MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eugen Konkov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:17:52 -0000 Hi, FreeBSD. I have many vlans on server. IPs on those vlans are like 10.X.X.X/Y I have run DHCP. But some times users on vlan can ON their soho router like DIR-300 or so and connect their internet cable to LAN port of that router. So in my vlan I have two DHCP servers. One is mine and second is on that router. Some users get wrong IPs from that router. Can I bind 192.168.1.1 address of router to server so restrict such router to work normally? Or s there any other method to prevent such ilegal DHCP servers on LAN? -- Eugen mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 12:53:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96FBC38 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:53:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ateve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (relay01a.mail.uk1.eechost.net [217.69.40.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922C48FC12 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [31.186.37.179] (helo=smtp.marelmo.com) by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tml4H-0006HB-0O for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:54:13 +0000 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com) by smtp.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Tml3f-0009B2-Fz for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:53:35 +0000 Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:53:27 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: shell script problem Message-Id: <20121223125327.bb4350ace7952b9ea3ee613d@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <50D6D56E.8000401@FreeBSD.org> References: <1356253535.76738.YahooMailClassic@web160101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <20121223103434.def7cd9c.freebsd@edvax.de> <20121223104311.557f3752.freebsd@edvax.de> <50D6D56E.8000401@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Info: 15567@permanet.ie (plain) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:53:44 -0000 On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:57:02 +0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > Hmmm.... I'd just like to draw your attention to the comm(1) program, > which lets you find lines common to two files, or only in one or other > of a pair of inputs, very easily. The only slight gotcha is that the > input files have to be sorted. For which purpose the sort program is most useful. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 13:11:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4D451F for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 13:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC878FC0A for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 13:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 23 Dec 2012 05:11:17 -0800 Message-ID: <50D702F6.6010408@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 08:11:18 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Damien Fleuriot Subject: Re: how to configure host login account to use jail? References: <50D66FEF.5040105@a1poweruser.com> <7B1B77F2-A104-4796-996B-DA5B8D448D54@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <7B1B77F2-A104-4796-996B-DA5B8D448D54@my.gd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Dec 2012 13:11:17.0584 (UTC) FILETIME=[FE4CA500:01CDE10E] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 13:11:16 -0000 Damien Fleuriot wrote: > On 23 Dec 2012, at 03:43, Fbsd8 wrote: > >> Have jails up and running on host with ip address of >> 10.0.10.10 10.0.10.11 10.0.10.12 10.0.10.13 10.0.10.14 >> The host rc.conf has >> ifconfig_xl0="DHCP" # nix connected to isp >> ifconfig_rl0="inet 10.0.10.2" #lan nic >> >> I want lan users to login to their jail by ip address using ssh. >> How do I setup host user accounts so they login to >> their associated jail? >> Is this something I code in the host user account or is it done >> by the remote ssh login command? >> >> How do other jail users do this? >> > > I assign public IPs to my jails and let people SSH to them. > Ok but as my question asks, how do you configure things to get that to work? I am after the details. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 13:17:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749D7609 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 13:17:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [94.23.254.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35AE68FC0A for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 13:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F30A62A; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 14:17:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197732CEC02; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 14:17:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 14:17:43 +0100 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: Eugen Konkov Subject: Re: bind 192.168.1.1 to all interfaces Message-ID: <20121223141743.16b526d5@davenulle.org> In-Reply-To: <141032435.20121223141747@yandex.ru> References: <141032435.20121223141747@yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; i386-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 13:17:49 -0000 Le Sun, 23 Dec 2012 14:17:47 +0200, Eugen Konkov a écrit : Hello, > Or s there any other method to prevent such ilegal DHCP servers on > LAN? At work we use "dhcp_probe" http://www.net.princeton.edu/software/dhcp_probe/ It works quite fine, when someone plug a dhcp server it is detected and we shutdown the switch port. I don't know if it runs on FreeBSD, it runs on Centos 6. Regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 14:46:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD98850 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 14:46:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BAC8FC0C for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 14:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBNEkZZP040679 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 23 Dec 2012 14:46:36 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk qBNEkZZP040679 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/qBNEkZZP040679; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Message-ID: <50D71941.10306@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 14:46:25 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: how to configure host login account to use jail? References: <50D66FEF.5040105@a1poweruser.com> <7B1B77F2-A104-4796-996B-DA5B8D448D54@my.gd> <50D702F6.6010408@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <50D702F6.6010408@a1poweruser.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigBCFC9A925B6E9951E0D327E0" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Damien Fleuriot , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 14:46:50 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigBCFC9A925B6E9951E0D327E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 23/12/2012 13:11, Fbsd8 wrote: > Ok but as my question asks, how do you configure things > to get that to work? I am after the details. You need to run an instance of sshd in each jail. Because sshd defaults to binding to INADDR_ANY, you need to modify the sshd configuration in the host system, so it binds to a specific address, otherwise it will likely block out the jailed sshd's: ListenAddress 192.0.2.1 ListenAddress 2001:DB8::1 ListenAddress 127.0.0.1 ListenAddress ::1 sshd in the jails doesn't need any similar configuration change. You don't need user accounts in your host system for the jail users -- each jail can have it's own passwd file etc. However, it can be useful to make sure that UID numbers for regular users in host and jails don't overlap. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enigBCFC9A925B6E9951E0D327E0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDXGUoACgkQ8Mjk52CukIw/LgCeMjMeoovPcYMUvgKOWEv4716a C8YAoICqlGwvLqTxUrQh3i/mmssHOaw7 =OrGm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigBCFC9A925B6E9951E0D327E0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 15:27:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E073EB14; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 15:27:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBE08FC0A; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 15:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 23 Dec 2012 07:27:18 -0800 Message-ID: <50D722D6.5070001@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:27:18 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: how to configure host login account to use jail? References: <50D66FEF.5040105@a1poweruser.com> <7B1B77F2-A104-4796-996B-DA5B8D448D54@my.gd> <50D702F6.6010408@a1poweruser.com> <50D71941.10306@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <50D71941.10306@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Dec 2012 15:27:18.0740 (UTC) FILETIME=[FEBA3940:01CDE121] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 15:27:18 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 23/12/2012 13:11, Fbsd8 wrote: >> Ok but as my question asks, how do you configure things >> to get that to work? I am after the details. > > You need to run an instance of sshd in each jail. Because sshd defaults > to binding to INADDR_ANY, you need to modify the sshd configuration in > the host system, so it binds to a specific address, otherwise it will > likely block out the jailed sshd's: > > ListenAddress 192.0.2.1 > ListenAddress 2001:DB8::1 > ListenAddress 127.0.0.1 > ListenAddress ::1 > > sshd in the jails doesn't need any similar configuration change. > > You don't need user accounts in your host system for the jail users -- > each jail can have it's own passwd file etc. However, it can be useful > to make sure that UID numbers for regular users in host and jails don't > overlap. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > What does the remote ssh login command look like? ssh on the host does not use the standard port 22. It uses 2299 instead. this stopped all the ssh break-in attempts. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 15:52:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0485685 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 15:52:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhenin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f171.google.com (mail-ie0-f171.google.com [209.85.223.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD53B8FC14 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 15:52:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 17so8203236iea.2 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 07:52:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=uHZvV6rYXdCVZk9/Fpt8sQu9/8nR+5nAaRG0Dj9FegY=; b=Iz2d4xtfnBfdeNMLfetUj+G9VyXNylceKbcKDJ9EwnfvEkrwa6miZF94JPuTjYmXOB d8UbtwTbdwqt4Woh4STpgukdnleZ0vZsTOatyE6d66Ef3n66yviPdwHxcStWeeS5eYw3 0lMFeTgz/eB3FToarUpdM5fE2qrpcGSX+2ADU5reWibnad2Hw3aUmvAVVvxpth53iLGu kQROILl3ABYRxOqsVNXMNuvmuuqD1b/evRCh9aUK3Et6hisNdGA9VwMileRM7NIEdn+b JHrDnBhJ/3HONNJMJ4/oEthHecmm86BPmG4/k5jp/OkGRgItGXK+BF1Oj81ATfKMXq4i ycJw== Received: by 10.50.161.232 with SMTP id xv8mr17791754igb.22.1356277968092; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 07:52:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.24.229 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 07:52:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121223104311.557f3752.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <1356253535.76738.YahooMailClassic@web160101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <20121223103434.def7cd9c.freebsd@edvax.de> <20121223104311.557f3752.freebsd@edvax.de> From: =?UTF-8?B?76O/IERow6luaW4gSmVhbi1KYWNxdWVz?= Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:52:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: shell script problem To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Global Users Mailing List , Jack Mc Lauren X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 15:52:55 -0000 2012/12/23 Polytropon > On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:34:34 +0100, Polytropon wrote: > > First, the lines with "read" have to be: > > > > cat /foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE1 > > > > cat /foo/bar/foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE2 > > > > Reason: $LINE1 and $LINE2 will be evaluated here, they are "empty > > string", causing "read" to throw an error. > > Excuse me - I made a mistake! Of course those two lines > have to be: > > cat /foo/bar.txt | while read LINE1 > > and > > cat /foo/bar/foo/bar.txt | while read LINE2 > > The $ infront of the variable names have to be removed. > The variable _name_, not its content, has to be provided > to "read" as a parameter. > > The script so far: > > > > #!/bin/sh > > cat foo.txt | while read LINE1 > * echo "Pid Process: " $$* > do > cat bar.txt | while read LINE2 > do > if [ "$LINE1" =3D "$LINE2" ]; then > sw=3D"1" > echo "Current value of sw is : " $sw > *ps -ax |grep bar * > break > fi > done > echo "Value of sw is : " $sw > if [ "$sw" =3D "0" ]; then > echo "DO SOMETHING!" > fi > sw=3D"0" > done > Has you can see, "pipe" make a subshell and sw is lost. Hope this help --------------------------------------------------------- (=C2=B0> Dh=C3=A9nin Jean-Jacques / ) 48, rue de la Justice 78300 Poissy ^^ dhenin@gmail.com --------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 16:15:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E6AEACC for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:15:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from anny.lostinspace.de (anny.lostinspace.de [IPv6:2a01:138:a006::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5CFB8FC0C for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.idefix.lan (ppp-93-104-77-248.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.77.248]) (authenticated bits=0) by anny.lostinspace.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBNGFdMR088783 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:15:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from server.idefix.lan (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A4235F5 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:15:39 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fechner.net Received: from server.idefix.lan ([127.0.0.1]) by server.idefix.lan (server.idefix.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id C01Nmc8mzCD4 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:15:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from matthias-fechners-macbook.local (unknown [80.122.82.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C326D35CE for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:15:38 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50D72E42.9000707@fechner.net> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:16:02 +0100 From: Matthias Fechner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Upgrade icu failed X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (anny.lostinspace.de [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:15:44 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on anny.lostinspace.de X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:15:50 -0000 Dear list, I checked the file /usr/ports/UPDATING and there is noted 20121218 for icu to execute the command: portmaster -w -r icu (my system is already on pkgng as described a in the UPDATING file, 20121015). If I execute now portmaster i get the following error message: ************************* ===>>> icu-4.8.1.1_1 1/1 ===>>> Currently installed version: icu-4.8.1.1_1 ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/devel/icu ===>>> Starting check for build dependencies ===>>> Gathering dependency list for devel/icu from ports ===>>> Launching child to update pkg-1.0.3_1 to pkg-1.0.4_1 ===>>> icu-4.8.1.1_1 1/1 >> pkg-1.0.3_1 (1/16) ===>>> Currently installed version: pkg-1.0.3_1 ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg ===>>> Starting check for build dependencies ===>>> Gathering dependency list for ports-mgmt/pkg from ports ===>>> No dependencies for ports-mgmt/pkg ===> Cleaning for pkg-1.0.4_1 You are about to convert your system to pkgng while you have ports/packages installed with the old pkg_install tools. You can choose to: - keep pkg_install as the package management system by adding this line to /etc/make.conf: WITHOUT_PKGNG=yes - switch to pkgng: 1) Add WITHOUT_PKGNG to /etc/make.conf 2) Install ports-mgmt/pkg 3) Convert your package database by running pkg2ng 4) Remove WITHOUT_PKGNG from /etc/make.conf *** [pre-everything] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg. ===>>> make failed for ports-mgmt/pkg ===>>> Aborting update ===>>> Update for pkg-1.0.3_1 failed ===>>> Aborting update ******************** Is this a know problem or the there someting in the UPDATING file not mentioned? In /etc/make.conf I have: WITH_PKGNG=yes (as descriped in 20121015) Thanks, Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 16:29:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6876D203 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:29:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15FB28FC0C for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:29:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TmoQo-0002JF-Dy for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:29:42 +0100 Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.21.186.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:29:42 +0100 Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:29:42 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Walter Hurry Subject: Re: Upgrade icu failed Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:29:16 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 61 Message-ID: References: <50D72E42.9000707@fechner.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 30dc37b master) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:29:45 -0000 On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:16:02 +0100, Matthias Fechner wrote: > Dear list, > > I checked the file /usr/ports/UPDATING and there is noted 20121218 for > icu to execute the command: > portmaster -w -r icu > > (my system is already on pkgng as described a in the UPDATING file, > 20121015). > If I execute now portmaster i get the following error message: > ************************* > ===>>> icu-4.8.1.1_1 1/1 > > ===>>> Currently installed version: icu-4.8.1.1_1 ===>>> Port directory: > /usr/ports/devel/icu > > ===>>> Starting check for build dependencies ===>>> Gathering dependency > list for devel/icu from ports ===>>> Launching child to update > pkg-1.0.3_1 to pkg-1.0.4_1 > > ===>>> icu-4.8.1.1_1 1/1 >> pkg-1.0.3_1 (1/16) > > ===>>> Currently installed version: pkg-1.0.3_1 ===>>> Port directory: > /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg > > ===>>> Starting check for build dependencies ===>>> Gathering dependency > list for ports-mgmt/pkg from ports ===>>> No dependencies for > ports-mgmt/pkg > > ===> Cleaning for pkg-1.0.4_1 You are about to convert your system to > pkgng while you have ports/packages installed with the old pkg_install > tools. > > You can choose to: > - keep pkg_install as the package management system by adding this line > to /etc/make.conf: > > WITHOUT_PKGNG=yes > > - switch to pkgng: > 1) Add WITHOUT_PKGNG to /etc/make.conf 2) Install ports-mgmt/pkg 3) > Convert your package database by running pkg2ng 4) Remove > WITHOUT_PKGNG from /etc/make.conf > > *** [pre-everything] Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg. > > ===>>> make failed for ports-mgmt/pkg ===>>> Aborting update > > ===>>> Update for pkg-1.0.3_1 failed ===>>> Aborting update > ******************** > > Is this a know problem or the there someting in the UPDATING file not > mentioned? > In /etc/make.conf I have: > WITH_PKGNG=yes (as descriped in 20121015) What's the output from pkg_info? Have you done any other upgrades of ports since migrating to pkgng? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 16:44:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC2D415 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:44:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from anny.lostinspace.de (anny.lostinspace.de [IPv6:2a01:138:a006::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0379B8FC0C for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.idefix.lan (ppp-93-104-77-248.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.77.248]) (authenticated bits=0) by anny.lostinspace.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBNGi5Pe094821 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:44:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from server.idefix.lan (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3FA484F for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:44:04 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fechner.net Received: from server.idefix.lan ([127.0.0.1]) by server.idefix.lan (server.idefix.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id nQjPWjadPdzk for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:44:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from matthias-fechners-macbook.local (unknown [80.122.82.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C4AA4843 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:44:03 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50D734EA.4080801@fechner.net> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:44:26 +0100 From: Matthias Fechner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade icu failed References: <50D72E42.9000707@fechner.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (anny.lostinspace.de [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:44:09 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on anny.lostinspace.de X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:44:12 -0000 Am 23.12.12 17:29, schrieb Walter Hurry: > What's the output from pkg_info? pkg info gives me a full list of all installed ports, pkg_info complains about a lot of corrupted package infos, but i think this is related to, pkg is new and pkg_info is the old tool. > Have you done any other upgrades of ports since migrating to pkgng? yes, I did my last upgrade 12.12.2012. Till the note in /usr/ports/UPDATING 20121212. After these steps I executed portmaster -a, which was successfully. Thanks, Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 16:56:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D39872A for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:56:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB3B8FC0A for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:56:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TmorE-0002PA-VD for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:57:00 +0100 Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.21.186.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:57:00 +0100 Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:57:00 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Walter Hurry Subject: Re: Upgrade icu failed Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:56:35 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <50D72E42.9000707@fechner.net> <50D734EA.4080801@fechner.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 30dc37b master) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:56:49 -0000 On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:44:26 +0100, Matthias Fechner wrote: > Am 23.12.12 17:29, schrieb Walter Hurry: >> What's the output from pkg_info? > > pkg info gives me a full list of all installed ports, pkg_info complains > about a lot of corrupted package infos, but i think this is related to, > pkg is new and pkg_info is the old tool. > >> Have you done any other upgrades of ports since migrating to pkgng? > > yes, I did my last upgrade 12.12.2012. > Till the note in /usr/ports/UPDATING 20121212. > After these steps I executed portmaster -a, which was successfully. pkg_info should be reporting 'no packages installed'. What is the output from pkg2ng? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 17:07:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647AE878 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:07:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward2h.mail.yandex.net (forward2h.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:f05::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0DB8FC14 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4h.mail.yandex.net (smtp4h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.186.21]) by forward2h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id D33A0700956; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:07:42 +0400 (MSK) Received: from smtp4h.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 96F3A2C006B; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:07:42 +0400 (MSK) Received: from unknown (unknown [77.93.52.20]) by smtp4h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id 7gciA1dG-7gcKf8vv; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:07:42 +0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1356282462; bh=QEzTCbVbTjmv1iAQRu0/aSOXFp+jZ22/ln/N7JHX4gw=; h=Date:From:X-Mailer:Reply-To:Organization:X-Priority:Message-ID:To: CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=QPEykTT5OLr6ATloBdktXqZ2jnQNcNIfQ+wuqpNskrBrh34etaA2Cdqazn9XlFstw O7V7lHoNkYtFn9koYLkNE8qFMndAiHBeAyO4h2JtXdmppMLloniIWKxt+6ZJtZm3wJ CQXQ74ukLgufLPas4GlDWJS5DyyAIdzjKMp238W4= Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:07:40 +0200 From: Eugen Konkov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: ISP FreeLine X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <152518885.20121223190740@yandex.ru> To: Patrick Lamaiziere Subject: Re[2]: bind 192.168.1.1 to all interfaces In-Reply-To: <20121223141743.16b526d5@davenulle.org> References: <141032435.20121223141747@yandex.ru> <20121223141743.16b526d5@davenulle.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eugen Konkov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:07:51 -0000 ЗдравÑтвуйте, Patrick. Ð’Ñ‹ пиÑали 23 Ð´ÐµÐºÐ°Ð±Ñ€Ñ 2012 г., 15:17:43: PL> Le Sun, 23 Dec 2012 14:17:47 +0200, PL> Eugen Konkov a écrit : PL> Hello, >> Or s there any other method to prevent such ilegal DHCP servers on >> LAN? PL> At work we use "dhcp_probe" PL> http://www.net.princeton.edu/software/dhcp_probe/ PL> It works quite fine, when someone plug a dhcp server it is detected and PL> we shutdown the switch port. PL> I don't know if it runs on FreeBSD, it runs on Centos 6. PL> Regards. Unfortunately we use unmanaged switches (((( -- С уважением, Eugen mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 17:48:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7762F933 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:48:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhenin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f173.google.com (mail-ie0-f173.google.com [209.85.223.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350678FC0A for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:48:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id e13so8293855iej.32 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:48:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=hKxy69oLFnokmvug8YrqcAWBKJlUFq1q0C6fUFXL8YY=; b=vSZNv8bs3/m2zo+6py/bGXiL8TFo52gGP2NDoUPv9S9KpG9jtHsyemjJhhc6oNzWBp snFvdNmCrPRINmlWJno9TcHxJncWGAiDy8awp8mXa/rlzgHihoNwwOAA2J97zis5XFWi PHblW8QUw+y4+qAlhDainuZBDKMbemNeBUcgJStCdVQnem0wxBfVM9ZCGhf5cnLEkEo6 Bv/6Sy2zs5cmTRFdFITYV01sf2Qac0O7bylWXbire+95p3oGekdvf8CZUCJmyKACVUC7 fTp+1xKHc8nxbJo6AJ9mSGJ9tT1vEXqn+fJ3sBHXsr+0kobhzouiwPpSEE3m6LKHd/Bt 0Wow== Received: by 10.50.152.240 with SMTP id vb16mr12984368igb.90.1356284932666; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:48:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.24.229 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:48:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121223104311.557f3752.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <1356253535.76738.YahooMailClassic@web160101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <20121223103434.def7cd9c.freebsd@edvax.de> <20121223104311.557f3752.freebsd@edvax.de> From: =?UTF-8?B?76O/IERow6luaW4gSmVhbi1KYWNxdWVz?= Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:48:12 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: shell script problem To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Global Users Mailing List , Jack Mc Lauren X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 17:48:53 -0000 2012/12/23 Polytropon > > #!/bin/sh > > cat foo.txt | while read LINE1 > do > cat bar.txt | while read LINE2 > do > if [ "$LINE1" =3D "$LINE2" ]; then > sw=3D"1" > echo "Current value of sw is : " $sw > * ps -l | grep $$ * # see subshell here > break > fi > done > * echo " Process: " $$* # And the parent > echo "Value of sw is : " $sw > if [ "$sw" =3D "0" ]; then > echo "DO SOMETHING!" > fi > sw=3D"0" > done > I suggest : -----------------%><------------------------------------- #!/bin/sh cat foo.txt | while read LINE1 do echo 'One' > $$tmp cat bar.txt |while read LINE2 do if [ "$LINE1" =3D "$LINE2" ]; then echo 'ok' > $$tmp break fi done if [ `cat $$tmp` =3D "One" ]; then echo "One !" fi if [ `cat $$tmp` =3D "ok" ]; then echo "ok !" fi done Best regards --------------------------------------------------------- (=C2=B0> Dh=C3=A9nin Jean-Jacques / ) 48, rue de la Justice 78300 Poissy ^^ dhenin@gmail.com --------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 20:35:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899AA692 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 20:35:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377118FC14 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 20:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TmsGu-0001zg-LH for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:35:46 +0100 Received: from 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:35:44 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:35:44 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jb Subject: Re: bind 192.168.1.1 to all interfaces Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 20:35:12 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <141032435.20121223141747@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121121 Firefox/10.0.11) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 20:35:37 -0000 Eugen Konkov yandex.ru> writes: > ... > So in my vlan I have two DHCP servers. One is mine and > second is on that router. Some users get wrong IPs from that router. > ... > Or s there any other method to prevent such ilegal DHCP servers on LAN? http://www.tcpipguide.com/free/t_DHCPSecurityIssues.htm jb From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 21:56:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E71AA1; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:56:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cross@distal.com) Received: from mail.distal.com (mail.distal.com [IPv6:2001:470:e24c:200::ae25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328CB8FC0A; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:56:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from magrathea.distal.com (magrathea.distal.com [IPv6:2001:470:e24c:200:ea06:88ff:feca:960e]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.distal.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qBNLuipj027750 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:56:45 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Ross Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Changes to kern.geom.debugflags? Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:56:44 -0500 Message-Id: <7AA0B5D0-D49C-4D5A-8FA0-AA57C091C040@distal.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (mail.distal.com [IPv6:2001:470:e24c:200::ae25]); Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:56:45 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:56:46 -0000 I had brought up a machine months ago with freebsd-9-stable. I = configured it to boot off of a single disk, with ZFS, expecting I would = likely later attach the other disk to the zpool. I tried to do that = today, but find that I can't write the bootloader to either disk. Google searching shows what I used last time, that if you get a: gpart: /dev/da0a: Operation not permitted you need to run sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=3D0x10 But, that doesn't change anything for me now. I can write the boot = label (using gpart bootcode -p /boot/zfsboot ${disk}) to neither disk, = getting the same error in both cases. Has something changed recently? I'm currently using a Dec 22 9-stable = codebase, built locally with GENERIC kernel. - Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 23:37:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883ABA43; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 23:37:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E9C8FC13; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 23:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 23 Dec 2012 15:37:01 -0800 Message-ID: <50D7959D.2000400@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:37:01 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: how to configure host login account to use jail? References: <50D66FEF.5040105@a1poweruser.com> <7B1B77F2-A104-4796-996B-DA5B8D448D54@my.gd> <50D702F6.6010408@a1poweruser.com> <50D71941.10306@FreeBSD.org> <50D722D6.5070001@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <50D722D6.5070001@a1poweruser.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Dec 2012 23:37:01.0202 (UTC) FILETIME=[680A1F20:01CDE166] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 23:37:00 -0000 Fbsd8 wrote: > Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 23/12/2012 13:11, Fbsd8 wrote: >>> Ok but as my question asks, how do you configure things >>> to get that to work? I am after the details. >> >> You need to run an instance of sshd in each jail. Because sshd defaults >> to binding to INADDR_ANY, you need to modify the sshd configuration in >> the host system, so it binds to a specific address, otherwise it will >> likely block out the jailed sshd's: >> >> ListenAddress 192.0.2.1 >> ListenAddress 2001:DB8::1 >> ListenAddress 127.0.0.1 >> ListenAddress ::1 >> >> sshd in the jails doesn't need any similar configuration change. >> >> You don't need user accounts in your host system for the jail users -- >> each jail can have it's own passwd file etc. However, it can be useful >> to make sure that UID numbers for regular users in host and jails don't >> overlap. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Matthew >> >> > > What does the remote ssh login command look like? > ssh on the host does not use the standard port 22. > It uses 2299 instead. this stopped all the ssh break-in attempts. > Have things working all except ssh login to jail from an FBSD box on the lan using native ssh command syntax. This is what I have Have single jail for testing assigned ip address of 10.0.10.20 and it has jail option for auto alias create/remove. From the host I logged into the jail and did these commands This turns on ssh in jail echo "sshd_enable="YES"" >> /etc/rc.conf Turn off dns check for fast jail start echo "UseDNS no" >> /etc/ssh/sshd_config Did adduser to create user account in jail to ssh into. Stop and restart jail for changes to take effect ssh on host has been changed to use port 9922. This stopped all the ssh break-in attempts from the public internet. From putty on xp box on lan can ssh to 10.0.10.2 9922 and login to any user account on host. Using 10.0.10.20 22 login to user account on jail just fine. From another lan box running FBSD can ssh into host user accounts using this command ssh host-user-account-name@10.0.10.2 just fine But I can not figure out syntax for native ssh command to login to jail. This is where in need some help in coding the correct -options and what values to use where. I read the man pages on ssh but its clear as mud to me. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 23:39:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D41B83 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 23:39:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf.mardorf@rocketmail.com) Received: from nm24-vm5.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com (nm24-vm5.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com [212.82.109.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA9A8FC12 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 23:39:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [77.238.189.51] by nm24.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Dec 2012 23:39:50 -0000 Received: from [217.146.188.235] by tm4.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Dec 2012 23:39:50 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp108.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Dec 2012 23:39:50 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rocketmail.com; s=s1024; t=1356305990; bh=AJIhetmmvC2cNhBr18fphw41Jhdv3q6MDW0++9WEtRg=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=wfCKi12aBH5ifDhzjg23feltOuLADEPcREZOZ+e0yOsVMmsJqihLm4xaiheqO1NadM0hTn14M85Zvzy9D8S1Moj1Goo8Q05mKy12bUD95FKl4cna880zoTxD/z2U1e1lBzLlPNG8C9Wst9iWI9mNMgyRopg23+TJxFVsMeQ0VnM= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 742714.3942.bm@smtp108.mail.ird.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: hRsqXyQVM1kqbEEMoV_MeOPqNwTpcHyq.W29L_5kPzeUewI JIZLPa6PByXpXoJKySVoRSPaqM8tTE7VBaRXATeBeQ3UZlXFHY4hOGi7RrUR irbmTyMnW3D7dR3IwVv4B1WN9Dtlh2kTIKD_YcANHK0xU4z3bLaHL4A226TG iW.kZ8YEu.KUoRN2Adq0BwLjoUy7LPOfZJS6.hFr61.1Ss7_9jyCAaBKcjtU ZaDB6NtZhEB8M_oxpYQ7soc4l58znGPqXSsbhKFb9r7yIug38NXCP78ZKxOS 9UTOQCBCXbWfxGETNho6xo56rSLwpgfHANHXgw2H4eFMfqAZjGN48CO8h1Sw OBXN7UGKdEiLKfk_rIQXDLE67TTQkfeTfF3vxXLxH_iXmVxk3HgZUOvoZLr7 3j1GYumso0wTanT5WF8slBghPbHNvbL57xMxiAPVItm4ibvv0vRzCXy.HLTh moDGdseujcNYrHXfgNKis5tDpYjufvhO.f5UyhdL.Ag-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: BeMCPs2swBABTJ3kAeEiC_hE0mz8jRexLddJfD8pI2j32fOacjBmXg-- Received: from [92.231.5.129] (ralf.mardorf@92.231.5.129 with login) by smtp108.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Dec 2012 15:39:50 -0800 PST Message-ID: <1356305989.2640.34.camel@q> Subject: Re: Upgrading FreeBSD 8.3 amd64 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 00:39:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1355852561.2501.10.camel@q> <20121218185757.f10640e0.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.0-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 23:39:58 -0000 Hi, I've done the upgrade yesterday. It was a clean 8.3 install, I only set up PPPoE and then run the following commands. # cd /usr/ports/misc/mc && make install clean # uname -r 8.3-RELEASE # freebsd-update -r 9.1-RELEASE upgrade # freebsd-update install # shutdown -r now # freebsd-update install # cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade && make install clean # /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade -f ruby # rm /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db # /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade -f ruby18-bdb # rm /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db /usr/ports/INDEX-*.db # /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade -af # freebsd-update install # shutdown -r now # freebsd-update IDS >> outfile.ids This is the content of outfile.ids: Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 9.1-RELEASE from update5.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. Applying metadata patches... done. Fetching 1 metadata files... done. Inspecting system... done. /boot/kernel/linker.hints has SHA256 hash ebf78144f48f13af88e5e3752735a709b084d7e6aaee10b05e57f2a117cbc366, but should have SHA256 hash 07b927068b34c4671a323e6a8aaa80ad22dc5fc4b3741b8a4060da1764510350. /etc/group has SHA256 hash 108de8653d4a6d451cc3f018780277d2fe2d770df7a7d984f5160dc753e06678, but should have SHA256 hash d788718c25a04a14cc1818ac2afa8b76a3fd899583691972d0d5127947e3504f. /etc/hosts has SHA256 hash 9684014402be7ecd32b9047181f595d124df6cf6a79dd323b0bd5685dccc2a81, but should have SHA256 hash f795387981b68599c3df984f2ce4ac4a32bf420d57faf1fb55f249b885414d64. /etc/master.passwd has SHA256 hash cd9046284ac3e571eb9f0273f9bfc118e7094e0b9312fd1789f6385e43a26cd3, but should have SHA256 hash 6f1da238cc0a55ed360a215039bc6cb5ce5369d20b8fbceb8a1941c5124e6a4e. /etc/motd has SHA256 hash fa311ce1a08aea0c818d57b904c979941dabb726d1fb2ddaa368102bd6f2fb95, but should have SHA256 hash 98f082efc89da5e887e72bc4dcfa3e5fc8bada9d19db4bdbba9a32692a7c82a7. /etc/passwd has SHA256 hash e4bcb10c66a0440efb58591daadaeec894e75e5392da9e00f3881822d0647a11, but should have SHA256 hash 3135de169a0ff94c0c97aeb525a07ea10e5ed81c9b825e219f7eea8deb97c444. /etc/ppp/ppp.conf has 0755 permissions, but should have 0600 permissions. /etc/ppp/ppp.conf has SHA256 hash 623683de09ab97394221c64ccdec3569aa240854d907a4811f91c9ed92253dd4, but should have SHA256 hash f3dd3d0da252bd47681a261a1f0d46a8fc6ae84ff3cbd34b81b586bc87e49655. /etc/pwd.db has SHA256 hash 62eb1eafbfa8fe718e68bf784e542d09ccdc09012ef43d254ae48e9846a1df4d, but should have SHA256 hash bf86739ee052821992412b61a6673811588c382fa63ab38cc47c1a59305376eb. /etc/shells has SHA256 hash 4c25fb7c79fe5057217a70cfa1c27f41959bb7daa703a94774ec5ac9d29a9266, but should have SHA256 hash beab7e474ee12b051b98889f368bbd490340a908f6f2287f9238e818b830a1fd. /etc/spwd.db has SHA256 hash b25126503c347feb67b76a5f27f44c318a675ddc82f4984b5ec0d2fc5a45fd30, but should have SHA256 hash 1cbfbea78d316e4e8d29f53f0770b8ff1f3a731e993c3ae717f36304715d7a5b. When I run "ppp -ddial alice" now, I get warnings "Bad label in /etc/ppp/ppp.conf (line x) - missing colon", but PPPoE still works. Why are the checksums bad? FWIW "snd_hdspe" now is available. Regards, Ralf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 24 02:42:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044C544D for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 02:42:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com) Received: from mail.nexlabs.com (mail.nexlabs.com [210.193.32.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86B2A8FC0C for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 02:42:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30687 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2012 02:35:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.nexlabs.com) (jhfoo@nexlabs.com@49.128.42.154) by mail.nexlabs.com with SMTP; 24 Dec 2012 02:35:48 -0000 X-SMScore: -1000 X-LCID: 1423 Received: from [(192.168.1.197)] by icarus with Xeams SMTP; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:35:11 +0800 (GMT+08:00) X-SM_RECEIVED_ON: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:35:11 +0800 (GMT+08:00) Message-ID: <50D7BF5C.1050301@extracktor.com> Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:35:08 +0800 From: Foo JH User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Merry Christmas everyon1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 02:42:02 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 24 08:59:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC90D4B; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 08:59:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D256D8FC17; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 08:58:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id t11so3190348wey.12 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 00:58:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=1brmVYWfWVF39hQRVyh0XssWxNHoV5FyVu+qk5MMohs=; b=Bom1tE/g9F1pOJb9oQLIHLg02aI/3B4JfqjJQJgnZPOzi1L6twmFDi4o8sm+tHQVlk SV46FSiv+qrfle/XXjRxWk12HkQ7LEe9Q/wKDBGi4yMi7kesmCoEVWitIi+BaFRpiRlj tWXBd0ZwP6CRK27cDxW9K4kkgbx2a8KM91jCy9hqyS/cEG2MVl3EKvFyN1HkhBndDPeg 5gDbyBt0kq24pILCXwg/QNBBl/9DmeQ+S1qyt6HjmNFeSFF5s8d1SGn2s5f6RxWfp+WO Z3K2QcKHmzfhkQdyyhkZHrgav7x4brIvmEHGE8bduuvF0QCgoUQa9zxz16+Ht9USNB5G MtoQ== X-Received: by 10.180.24.133 with SMTP id u5mr25714890wif.17.1356339538461; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 00:58:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.dg (41-132-132-229.dsl.mweb.co.za. [41.132.132.229]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bd6sm10821162wib.10.2012.12.24.00.58.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 24 Dec 2012 00:58:57 -0800 (PST) From: David Naylor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.19 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:58:48 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.9.1; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1899030.dzI2tkV8WP"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201212241058.51978.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 08:59:00 -0000 --nextPart1899030.dzI2tkV8WP Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.5.19 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. T= he=20 packages for FreeBSD 10 use the pkgng [3] format. =20 Please read the installation messages, if you use the nVidia graphics drive= r,=20 for further information. =20 =46AQ =2D-- Q: Wine crashing when launching some 3D programs (aka games) A: This appears to be some clash with software however I have not been able= to=20 isolate where the problem is occurring (wine, ports, world, kernel, i386,=20 amd64). A possible solution in to try upgrading, or downgrading, software= =20 used however I have not been able to fix the problem with my attempts. If = you=20 find a solution please email me, or post the solution on the mailing list. Q: wine: failed to initialize: / usr/local/lib32/wine/ntdll.dll.so: Undefin= ed symbol "_ThreadRuneLocale" A: This problem is specific to FreeBSD-9.0, please either stick with=20 wine-1.5.10 or update to a newer version of FreeBSD (-STABLE or 9.1). =20 Apologies for the inconvenience. =20 Q: Creating pkgng packages for FreeBSD-9 A: When there is no demand for FreeBSD-8 packages I'll create additional pk= gng=20 packages for FreeBSD-9. Since it is possible to install the existing pkg=20 packages in a pkgng environment (which I do) this is not a high priority. = =20 Q: Wine doesn't run (properly) with a clang built world A: Clang was compiling i386 on a 16-byte boundary while gcc was using a 4-b= yte=20 boundary. To fix, recompile world after ensuring your sources include=20 http://beta.freshbsd.org/commit/freebsd/r242835 or the relevant MFC. =20 Regards, David [1] MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.5.19,1.tbz) =3D=20 c442808517aa6d77bb3c3d86f5a4031e MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.5.19.1.txz) =3D=20 86b2d231caba230d1829db1c961ed38c MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd10/wine-fbsd64-1.5.19,1.txz) =3D=20 90b9aa6cc54024349ea5389efb7f9d4c [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 [3] http://wiki.freebsd.org/pkgng --nextPart1899030.dzI2tkV8WP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAlDYGUsACgkQUaaFgP9pFrKC5ACfQgy6IegZT/kl5x4IiwnXhmrP mKkAoIzKolRW4LzuvCQtQxOevqvlqI4k =snRX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1899030.dzI2tkV8WP-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 24 09:41:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5A74EE for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 09:41:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from anny.lostinspace.de (anny.lostinspace.de [IPv6:2a01:138:a006::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1FF8FC0C for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 09:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.idefix.lan (ppp-93-104-77-248.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.77.248]) (authenticated bits=0) by anny.lostinspace.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBO9fHtk024365 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:41:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from server.idefix.lan (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id B297448FC for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:41:17 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fechner.net Received: from server.idefix.lan ([127.0.0.1]) by server.idefix.lan (server.idefix.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id zQpoWq2F_vUM for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:41:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from matthias-fechners-macbook.local (unknown [80.122.82.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 117F748F4 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:41:16 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50D82357.7020801@fechner.net> Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:41:43 +0100 From: Matthias Fechner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade icu failed References: <50D72E42.9000707@fechner.net> <50D734EA.4080801@fechner.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (anny.lostinspace.de [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:41:22 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on anny.lostinspace.de X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 09:41:29 -0000 Am 23.12.12 17:56, schrieb Walter Hurry: > pkg_info should be reporting 'no packages installed'. > What is the output from pkg2ng? I get there a lot of error messages: **************************** pkg_info: the package info for package 'ImageMagick-6.8.0.7' is corrupt usage: pkg info pkg info -a pkg info [-eDgxXdrlBsqOf] pkg info [-drlBsqfR] -F For more information see 'pkg help info'. pkg_info: the package info for package 'ImageMagick-6.8.0.7' is corrupt make: don't know how to make showconfig. Stop cat: /var/db/pkg/ImageMagick-6.8.0.7/+COMMENT: No such file or directory pkg_info: the package info for package 'ImageMagick-6.8.0.7' is corrupt egrep: /var/db/pkg/ImageMagick-6.8.0.7/+CONTENTS: No such file or directory pkg: open(/tmp/pkg2ngfNwkS/+DESC): No such file or directory Segmentation fault (core dumped) Registration of ImageMagick-6.8.0.7 failed. name: ImageMagick version: 6.8.0.7 origin: comment: | maintainer: prefix: licenselogic: single deps: pkg_info: the package info for package 'ORBit2-2.14.19' is corrupt usage: pkg info pkg info -a pkg info [-eDgxXdrlBsqOf] pkg info [-drlBsqfR] -F **************************** It continues with a lot of packages, it seems for all packages upgraded since the change from pkg to pkgng. Is this maybe a problem with portmaster? Thanks, Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 24 10:28:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C39BD1E; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:28:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com (mail-wg0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88CC78FC12; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:27:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id dq12so3097696wgb.0 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 02:27:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=/NWippv+AfssOnhP4T6BRguyOLzbLT74a0GZsUKjE1o=; b=LT/JrKHV+cEGYQOy5jdZG00WKWKg9aFQxwnZVPZP2fA4FwMnN81oMQZ5I8PUef+Yx1 yjhtm7/MRbN5k+2hu2l8s/5N9NMZOuov3DtBVA/s9RAiL+RDCqWTt6TRmLTh98+QuhRt zHPLAJkS7XeFXja6DhuxK6ZVH2d2GPZb/qvZgDPKrF27kEqor7g/B64PgnJ5dVu9Z0Rg 09Jmx2Rfj14bq6tk4Xszmu3YbpCShw2cM50KxIQ082wInUHMWc5uJ/ZCvE7yY46gUOL5 ykqtpliscmxRrW560KQfPZQO8NlxuHvyAMkZyx14kXYYbKm8sPHfYmTtO3SwFEz2bC9n LSAA== X-Received: by 10.194.71.140 with SMTP id v12mr34802447wju.36.1356344878155; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 02:27:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.dg (41-132-132-229.dsl.mweb.co.za. [41.132.132.229]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ew4sm32495570wid.11.2012.12.24.02.27.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 24 Dec 2012 02:27:57 -0800 (PST) From: David Naylor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.20 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 12:27:11 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.9.1; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1561069.onBiTI3zvH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201212241227.15165.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:28:00 -0000 --nextPart1561069.onBiTI3zvH Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.5.20 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. T= he=20 packages for FreeBSD 10 use the pkgng [3] format. =20 Please read the installation messages, if you use the nVidia graphics drive= r,=20 for further information. =20 =46AQ =2D-- Q: Wine crashing when launching some 3D programs (aka games) A: This appears to be some clash with software however I have not been able= to=20 isolate where the problem is occurring (wine, ports, world, kernel, i386,=20 amd64). A possible solution in to try upgrading, or downgrading, software= =20 used however I have not been able to fix the problem with my attempts. If = you=20 find a solution please email me, or post the solution on the mailing list. Q: wine: failed to initialize: / usr/local/lib32/wine/ntdll.dll.so: Undefin= ed symbol "_ThreadRuneLocale" A: This problem is specific to FreeBSD-9.0, please either stick with=20 wine-1.5.10 or update to a newer version of FreeBSD (-STABLE or 9.1). =20 Apologies for the inconvenience. =20 Q: Creating pkgng packages for FreeBSD-9 A: When there is no demand for FreeBSD-8 packages I'll create additional pk= gng=20 packages for FreeBSD-9. Since it is possible to install the existing pkg=20 packages in a pkgng environment (which I do) this is not a high priority. = =20 Q: Wine doesn't run (properly) with a clang built world A: Clang was compiling i386 on a 16-byte boundary while gcc was using a 4-b= yte=20 boundary. To fix, recompile world after ensuring your sources include=20 http://beta.freshbsd.org/commit/freebsd/r242835 or the relevant MFC. =20 Regards, David [1] MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.5.20,1.tbz) =3D=20 f292068a82cec3d068ce0ca6d154037c MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.5.20.1.txz) =3D=20 5467ea90a1ceac62f28eb4658cb53960 MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd10/wine-fbsd64-1.5.20,1.txz) =3D=20 6961696e9c8195b2969a46ee7ffa8a21 [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 [3] http://wiki.freebsd.org/pkgng --nextPart1561069.onBiTI3zvH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAlDYLgMACgkQUaaFgP9pFrKm7QCdH/MqcnlLOs6CQDwXsW/CnV4r OsUAn1SqkfxP9YP49hNDdAu1sWkkrKnU =tn3k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1561069.onBiTI3zvH-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 24 07:16:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C1E594 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 07:16:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kia00000@rambler.ru) Received: from mxout2.rambler.ru (mxout2.rambler.ru [81.19.67.59]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17978FC0A for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 07:16:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from saddam2.rambler.ru (saddam2.rambler.ru [10.32.16.2]) by mxout2.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6CE81B53 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:08:57 +0400 (MSK) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saddam2.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id D348627A45E for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:08:57 +0400 (MSK) Received: from [84.23.59.161] by saddam2.rambler.ru with HTTP; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:08:57 +0400 From: =?koi8-r?B?ydfBziDL1drOxcPP1w==?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ports and pbi Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:08:57 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Message-Id: <1356332937.582292.29385.31162@saddam2.rambler.ru> X-Mailer: Rambler WebMail, http://mail.rambler.ru/ X-Rambler-User: kia00000@rambler.ru/84.23.59.161 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rambler.ru; s=dkim; t=1356332937; bh=P0YnbTF5/SOp12Qu+f7kDrdYlCu0s69fh/Fiov7P6a4=; h=From:To:Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Message-Id; b=gkO8KPOClUoQU+kNcVpOGY/hE4I38YOilZSA5kT7cWKt8zEBiPNEQ8c8KN9CUjIDd ygDMzvkDyHEQYwEmalue/SnyXXNlAh6+LRq+0YVAkwVEl0slOmVJkYkUebnJGLovjH 4mXkqnwJa7IFSkEleQwHQ2nJGQ8ew3UhS+XICimA= X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 12:49:44 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?koi8-r?B?ydfBziDL1drOxcPP1w==?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 07:16:16 -0000 i want to make pbi files for i386 freebsd on amd64 freebsd. i attempt use v= irtualbox, but speed is low. what to do? =D0=B8=D0=B2=D0=B0=D0=BD =D0=BA=D1=83=D0=B7=D0=BD=D0=B5=D1=86=D0=BE=D0=B2. >=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 24 14:19:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD434BE3 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FAC8FC12 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:19:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBOEJMkv004635 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:19:22 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk qBOEJMkv004635 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/qBOEJMkv004635; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Message-ID: <50D86461.6050109@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:19:13 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports and pbi References: <1356332937.582292.29385.31162@saddam2.rambler.ru> In-Reply-To: <1356332937.582292.29385.31162@saddam2.rambler.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDF45E98AA277E23A8B01A5D9" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:19:33 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDF45E98AA277E23A8B01A5D9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 24/12/2012 07:08, =D0=B8=D0=B2=D0=B0=D0=BD =D0=BA=D1=83=D0=B7=D0=BD=D0= =B5=D1=86=D0=BE=D0=B2 wrote: > i want to make pbi files for i386 freebsd on amd64 freebsd. i attempt > use virtualbox, but speed is low. what to do? I don't know about PBI's specifically, but a fairly standard technique for building i386 ports is to set up an i386 jail on an amd64 host. That should give you something pretty much as fast as your base system. You can create a 32bit jail in many ways, but probably the easiest thing to do is download one of the FreeBSD 32bit .iso images. You can then extract the install sets using tar(1) -- from within the .iso file system you want /usr/freebsd-dist/base.txz, and that you can untar in the root directory of your jail to give you a pretty complete system. Given you're after PBI's you can probably do a similar trick using PC-BSD install images, but I don't know the details there. I'm sure someone on one of the various PC-BSD fora will know though. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enigDF45E98AA277E23A8B01A5D9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDYZGkACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxf6wCePugUBB2EJkDOfrVuO6fitWP+ oYoAn08C/xbw9fSSQnZLQvVH255ncuee =enw3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDF45E98AA277E23A8B01A5D9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 24 15:51:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695A0587; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 15:51:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f173.google.com (mail-we0-f173.google.com [74.125.82.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C068F8FC0C; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 15:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id z2so3245646wey.4 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 07:51:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; bh=S4wMx2EIwW19h3I5MOe8vnUmgQSOIelSOO8agr38NFM=; b=Sayx9Wb4FbJtXyX+xaSMlTutVUhKvcBi5ya7et72yXgzv1ecOf20+adwbpUZzWrClS NR0Wl9NeUxH70u95VgGiYaYLvyWuURsEvWdJUUlOblbSt7tSVaKeWAB1FsaIVTnSbWZA MtSS/USv6HO25P+yVNmJ6ol2cDuG7JU5NRE7Lz1s88E2Liomse3BIus7EAXkWGNnIdsy Sv21E5+ADqvD867KqM+6APNXBuK5wgZwH9x4WOEdLmVbroztjBuHURIxX2Qw6JYQ2K9W VKwCNvb8tOItpvb01FuG1+dFKZa1Uegec3aHE53/4hl14PSxwLW9D1kcqmlLVntoE8od p5tA== X-Received: by 10.194.76.137 with SMTP id k9mr36387847wjw.29.1356364285615; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 07:51:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.dg (41-132-132-229.dsl.mweb.co.za. [41.132.132.229]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s16sm39056243wii.0.2012.12.24.07.51.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 24 Dec 2012 07:51:24 -0800 (PST) From: David Naylor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.18 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:51:14 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.9.1; amd64; ; ) References: <201212011521.21180.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201212011521.21180.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1425665.JJyC8MQ2m6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201212241751.17040.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 15:51:27 -0000 --nextPart1425665.JJyC8MQ2m6 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Apologies, the incorrect package was uploaded for wine-1.5.x-freebsd9 for=20 wine-fbsd64-1.5.18. The correct file is: MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.5.18.1.txz) =3D f256fb13adaf5c8bf313c5973ac8159c Regards, David On Saturday, 1 December 2012 15:21:14 David Naylor wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.5.18 have been uploaded to mediafire [2].= =20 > The packages for FreeBSD 10 use the pkgng [3] format. >=20 > Please read the installation messages, if you use the nVidia graphics > driver, for further information. >=20 > FAQ > --- > Q: wine: failed to initialize: / usr/local/lib32/wine/ntdll.dll.so: > Undefined symbol "_ThreadRuneLocale" > A: This problem is specific to FreeBSD-9.0, please either stick with > wine-1.5.10 or update to a newer version of FreeBSD (-STABLE or 9.1). > Apologies for the inconvenience. >=20 > Q: Creating pkgng packages for FreeBSD-9 > A: When there is no demand for FreeBSD-8 packages I'll create additional > pkgng packages for FreeBSD-9. Since it is possible to install the > existing pkg packages in a pkgng environment (which I do) this is not a > high priority. >=20 > Q: Wine doesn't run (properly) with a clang built world > A: Clang was compiling i386 on a 16-byte boundary while gcc was using a > 4-byte boundary. To fix, recompile world after ensuring your sources > include http://beta.freshbsd.org/commit/freebsd/r242835 or the relevant > MFC. >=20 > Regards, >=20 > David >=20 > [1] > MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.5.18,1.tbz) =3D > 7335bcf8fd3a3bcb98a74e2b9d797963 > MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.5.18.1.txz) =3D > 6fb7d760ffe9ef19457982e861e84f83 > MD5 (wine-1.5.x-freebsd10/wine-fbsd64-1.5.18,1.txz) =3D > 13c54f14d4f51e46f1b22320b41308ca > [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 > [3] http://wiki.freebsd.org/pkgng --nextPart1425665.JJyC8MQ2m6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAlDYefUACgkQUaaFgP9pFrLTVACfX2nFWglpANORYO4m8vzZUiWH v9QAn1rG2iBT2zvgzQJSnNUhdLzYVoUO =Xooc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1425665.JJyC8MQ2m6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 24 16:40:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E123DB94 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:40:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hugo@barafranca.com) Received: from mail.barafranca.com (mail.barafranca.com [67.213.67.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11288FC1C for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [172.16.100.24]) by mail.barafranca.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C736F5B6 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:40:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at barafranca.com Received: from mail.barafranca.com ([172.16.100.24]) by localhost (mail.barafranca.com [172.16.100.24]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1KKPPUPytn3J for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:39:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.1] (a89-152-58-56.cpe.netcabo.pt [89.152.58.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.barafranca.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 911345B1 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:39:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <50D8854A.5050908@barafranca.com> Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:39:38 +0000 From: Hugo Silva User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: working SIP phone for FreeBSD? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:40:43 -0000 Hi all, I've been searching for a working solution to use audio+video and sip on FreeBSD. So far the webcam is working with webcamd's/v4l help and that's a good start. I tried linphone and ekiga3, neither of which worked (both ports are outdated as well). There are instructions to build ekiga4 from source @ their website but I have not attempted that yet. Just wondering, and for future reference, what are FreeBSD users using as a SIP client for audio+video these days? (skype is not an option for me for various reasons not worth getting into -- please let's keep it on topic lest it derails like this thread last year http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2011-June/231017.html) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 24 16:48:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02FAD16 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:48:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968E18FC0C for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:48:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [188.174.53.222] (helo=localhost.my.domain) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TnBCM-0007iB-K6; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:48:19 +0100 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qBOGmGEg003861; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:48:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id qBOGmGYk003860; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:48:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:48:16 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: Hugo Silva Subject: Re: working SIP phone for FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20121224164815.GA3837@tinyCurrent> References: <50D8854A.5050908@barafranca.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <50D8854A.5050908@barafranca.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT r214444 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 188.174.53.222 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:48:26 -0000 El día Monday, December 24, 2012 a las 04:39:38PM +0000, Hugo Silva escribió: > Hi all, > > I've been searching for a working solution to use audio+video and sip on > FreeBSD. So far the webcam is working with webcamd's/v4l help and that's > a good start. > > I tried linphone and ekiga3, neither of which worked (both ports are > outdated as well). There are instructions to build ekiga4 from source @ > their website but I have not attempted that yet. Hi, You could check 'baresip' from the ports or directly from: http://www.creytiv.com/pub/baresip-0.4.2.tar.gz http://www.creytiv.com/pub/restund-0.4.2.tar.gz HIH matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 24 17:34:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FC21FB for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:34:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tzabal@it.teithe.gr) Received: from alpha.it.teithe.gr (alpha.it.teithe.gr [195.251.240.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5FB8FC13 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:34:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([195.251.123.231]) by alpha.it.teithe.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id qBOHX9PT012711; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 19:33:11 +0200 Received: from dsl-aauv35.dyn.edudsl.gr (dsl-aauv35.dyn.edudsl.gr [37.32.170.225]) by webmail.it.teithe.gr (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 19:33:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20121224193308.14856fti4vxsgs0k@webmail.it.teithe.gr> Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 19:33:08 +0200 From: Tzanetos Balitsaris To: Hugo Silva Subject: Re: working SIP phone for FreeBSD? References: <50D8854A.5050908@barafranca.com> In-Reply-To: <50D8854A.5050908@barafranca.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.7) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:34:41 -0000 Quoting Hugo Silva : > Hi all, > > I've been searching for a working solution to use audio+video and sip on > FreeBSD. So far the webcam is working with webcamd's/v4l help and that's > a good start. > > I tried linphone and ekiga3, neither of which worked (both ports are > outdated as well). There are instructions to build ekiga4 from source @ > their website but I have not attempted that yet. > > > Just wondering, and for future reference, what are FreeBSD users using > as a SIP client for audio+video these days? (skype is not an option for > me for various reasons not worth getting into -- please let's keep it on > topic lest it derails like this thread last year > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2011-June/231017.html) I suggest Jitsi [1]. It is an open source audio/video and chat software written in Java that supports multiple protocols including SIP. Specifically, the former name of it was SIP Communicator. It was listed as a wanted port in Wiki and in the beginning of December I submitted it as a new port in GNATS. If you want to install it on your system and test it, please download from the PR [2] the jitsi.shar file and install it as usual (make install clean). [1] https://jitsi.org/ [2] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=174208 -- Tzanetos Balitsaris ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 24 21:23:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A60C24 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 21:23:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lokadamus@gmx.de) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A503B8FC14 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 21:23:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.71]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M1Cg2-1Su3P62dkO-00tFOC for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 22:23:20 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Dec 2012 21:23:20 -0000 Received: from ip-2-203-247-157.web.vodafone.de (EHLO [2.203.247.157]) [2.203.247.157] by mail.gmx.net (mp071) with SMTP; 24 Dec 2012 22:23:20 +0100 X-Authenticated: #3333826 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+oE8ZdR0ioj66e6Kqgt51B85GceAaAIBuDhbq6+s Vcu2qkcBxG5DZD Message-ID: <50D8C7C4.7030600@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 22:23:16 +0100 From: "lokadamus@gmx.de" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120909 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Laszlo Nagy Subject: Re: portmaster + unknown dependency problem References: <50ABDE5F.5020702@shopzeus.com> In-Reply-To: <50ABDE5F.5020702@shopzeus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 21:23:22 -0000 On 20.11.2012 20:47, Laszlo Nagy wrote: > I have a 8.2-STABLE system. Last port upgrade was about a year ago. (I > know, this is bad.) I was trying to update all ports, by following the > UPDATING file. As it turned out, some ports has been > deprecated/deleted. I have a problem in particular with the > py-bittornado-core port. I do not need it. So I have deleted it: > > # pkg_info | grep bittornado > # > > Clearly, it is not installed. However, when I write in this command: > > # portmaster -a > > Then I get this error: > > ===>>> The net-p2p/py-bittornado-core port has been deleted: Has > expired: Depends on the deprecated wx 2.4 > ===>>> Aborting update > > Well, here is the question: why does it want to build a port that does > not even exist in the ports tree? It was really deleted, there is no > such thing as /usr/ports/net-p2p/py-bittornado-core . I have also > tried to do this: > > # portmaster -a -x py-bittornado-core > > but it has exactly the same problem. Is this a stale dependency to a > nonexistent port? How can I overcome this problem? > > Thanks, > > Laszlo > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > make "pkg_info | grep "*bittornado*" When it found this package, you can think about to delete it. When you have delete it or doesnt found it, make a "portmaster --check-depends" to solve depends. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 25 00:35:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBADAFFE; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 00:35:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cross+freebsd@distal.com) Received: from mail.distal.com (mail.distal.com [IPv6:2001:470:e24c:200::ae25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8109E8FC0A; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 00:35:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from magrathea.distal.com (magrathea.distal.com [206.138.151.12]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.distal.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qBP0Zv5k000719 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 24 Dec 2012 19:35:57 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: Changes to kern.geom.debugflags? From: Chris Ross In-Reply-To: <7AA0B5D0-D49C-4D5A-8FA0-AA57C091C040@distal.com> Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 19:35:57 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6A0C1005-F328-4C4C-BB83-CA463BD85127@distal.com> References: <7AA0B5D0-D49C-4D5A-8FA0-AA57C091C040@distal.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (mail.distal.com [206.138.151.250]); Mon, 24 Dec 2012 19:35:57 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 00:35:58 -0000 On Dec 23, 2012, at 16:56 , Chris Ross wrote: > I had brought up a machine months ago with freebsd-9-stable. I = configured it to boot off of a single disk, with ZFS, expecting I would = likely later attach the other disk to the zpool. I tried to do that = today, but find that I can't write the bootloader to either disk. >=20 > gpart: /dev/da0a: Operation not permitted >=20 > [...] Okay. It occurred to me today what was likely the problem. I was = running, even when single user, off of the zfs pool on the disks I was = trying to write the bootloader to. I tar'd up /boot after my recent install from a Dec 22 9-stable, and = moved it off-host. Then, I booted off of the July stable-9 CD-ROM I = have in the machine, and was able to write bootblocks (with gpart = bootcode) and a bootloader (dd if=3D/boot/zfsloader of=3D/dev/${disk}a = bs=3D512 oseek=3D1024 conv=3Dnotrunc). Now, the new problem. When I try to boot my sparc64 with these bits, = I see: >> FreeBSD/sparc64 ZFS boot block Boot path: /pci@1c,600000/scsi@2/disk@0,0:a Consoles: Open Firmware console =20 ERROR: Last Trap: Division by Zero {1} ok So, does anyone know if something has gone unstable in the sparc64 = zfsboot in recent months? If I boot from the cdrom again and load the = July zfsboot via gpart bootcode, it boots correctly again. Thanks. Any feedback appreciated. - Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 25 04:38:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CA4CBA for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 04:38:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2238FC14 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 04:38:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id qBP4c3sh071430; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 15:38:03 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 15:38:03 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Dh?nin Jean-Jacques Subject: Re: shell script problem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20121225152522.E83325@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Jack Mc Lauren X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 04:38:29 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 447, Issue 1, Message: 13 On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:48:12 +0100 Dh?nin Jean-Jacques > 2012/12/23 Polytropon > > #!/bin/sh > > > > cat foo.txt | while read LINE1 > > do > > cat bar.txt | while read LINE2 > > do > > if [ "$LINE1" = "$LINE2" ]; then > > sw="1" > > echo "Current value of sw is : " $sw > > > * ps -l | grep $$ * > # see subshell here Yes indeed. > > break > > fi > > done > > > > * echo " Process: " $$* > # And the parent Yep. > > echo "Value of sw is : " $sw > > if [ "$sw" = "0" ]; then > > echo "DO SOMETHING!" > > fi > > sw="0" > > done > > > > I suggest : > > -----------------%><------------------------------------- > > #!/bin/sh > > cat foo.txt | while read LINE1 > do > echo 'One' > $$tmp > cat bar.txt |while read LINE2 > do > if [ "$LINE1" = "$LINE2" ]; then > echo 'ok' > $$tmp > break > fi > done > > if [ `cat $$tmp` = "One" ]; then > echo "One !" > fi > > if [ `cat $$tmp` = "ok" ]; then > echo "ok !" > fi > done Or, to avoid subshell(s) created in pipeline(s), and subsequent loss of variables set in the subshell(s) to their parents, rather than using: cat foo.txt | while read LINE1 [..] cat bar.txt | while read LINE2 [..] done [..] done you can use: while read LINE1 [..] while read LINE2 [..] done < bar.txt [..] done < foo.txt cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 25 08:33:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A1491D; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 08:33:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8B18FC15; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 08:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id o1so6638999wic.5 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 00:33:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; bh=gft0Bz/qL7FwPmiHPVi9PMyxLkGKngDpXem0+ZyDGm8=; b=Nj++vxplGx+PfjK/Nm6jS3jx0+KExLUk2zw19wgmxaZW0Spv4Y4YZsMZ/20QZwMj3x Qn5ol10ZUdHIat4a9iasFY5urBz1vhoa/bqeUNSWWjyo7gs4ssU101404nsMb0PHFezi XrEq3noY1sW6tDVqccN2EMtssDR43UbeKWA1Odryn7NLZgw/p7Eq3Eevpg8CoAmVMBB5 Ztljk/4zGpIpq8nIyrxyWuM/nJ1vBPpKnfaRHwHaYohznUAHrSyM9MPrz2A4lJp3e+/h pnsevYjv9wPnXR6KXlq/xSJfiW/ctmrBeqFA4+vWCdKOdGcpZmjlRbufKI2BX9QY4WSP dkxw== X-Received: by 10.194.236.166 with SMTP id uv6mr38873806wjc.34.1356424421786; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 00:33:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.dg (41-132-132-229.dsl.mweb.co.za. [41.132.132.229]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s16sm42255305wii.0.2012.12.25.00.33.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 25 Dec 2012 00:33:40 -0800 (PST) From: David Naylor To: Ross Subject: Re: Sound lag in Wine Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:33:32 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.9.1; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1768253.drIfEMAh01"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201212251033.35617.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 08:33:49 -0000 --nextPart1768253.drIfEMAh01 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi On Thursday, 20 December 2012 15:08:31 Ross wrote: > Hello. >=20 > I installed David Naylor's wine-fbsd64-1.5.18. > Installed Steam, bought Counter-Strike 1.6 and CS: CZ. >=20 > However, when I run these games I experience a sound lag (maybe a > half-second =E2=80=94 second). I remember having a similar problem, although my issue was an echo. After = a=20 few updates the issue disappeared. =20 > I googled the topic, the soultion is to switch to Alsa, which is not > supported in wine-fbsd64-1.5.18=E2=80=A6 >=20 > Is there anything I can do to get rid of the lag? I can suggest three things to try: 1) Update software 1.1) Upgrade (or downgrade) wine (I've release version 1.5.20) 1.2) Upgrade ports (some sound related components may cause issues, althou= gh=20 *very* unlikely) 1.3) Upgrade kernel and world (sound fixes may be available to fix your=20 issue) =20 2) Try building your own wine package with ALSA support (requires a i386=20 jail/chroot, editing the emulators/wine-devel/Makefile and manually install= ing=20 the ALSA port). See my other emails regarding the procedure to build a win= e- fbsd64 package. =20 3) File a bug report to bugs.winehq.org. I've found the sound guy very=20 responsive and willing to fix the OSS backend (patches may be provided=20 requiring parts of step 2). =20 If you do not come right please ping me in the middle of Jan and I'll try=20 assist you (I should be able to get a copy of CS 1.6). =20 Regards, David --nextPart1768253.drIfEMAh01 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAlDZZN8ACgkQUaaFgP9pFrIqFQCfbDNedakx+LtIQfrmizK1p3LA 4dMAn3bwsluYqS3VOKRUKPgxnN4nkWbv =iniA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1768253.drIfEMAh01-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 25 09:03:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51ADC19 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 09:03:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe03.c2i.net [212.247.154.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568AC8FC12 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 09:03:29 +0000 (UTC) X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED Received: from [176.74.213.204] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop015.hselasky.homeunix.org) by mailfe03.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPA id 194718542 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:03:23 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: working SIP phone for FreeBSD? Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:05:00 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.8.4; amd64; ; ) X-Face: 'mmZ:T{)),Oru^0c+/}w'`gU1$ubmG?lp!=R4Wy\ELYo2)@'UZ24N@d2+AyewRX}mAm; Yp |U[@, _z/([?1bCfM{_"B<.J>mICJCHAzzGHI{y7{%JVz%R~yJHIji`y>Y}k1C4TfysrsUI -%GU9V5]iUZF&nRn9mJ'?&>O MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201212251005.00376.hselasky@c2i.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 09:03:30 -0000 Hi, Linphone has fixed support for video under FreeBSD in SVN/GIT at least. Just google for that. There are patches you can try. --HPS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 25 09:12:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F3DD03 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 09:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe08.c2i.net [212.247.154.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83B68FC13 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 09:11:59 +0000 (UTC) X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED Received: from [176.74.213.204] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop015.hselasky.homeunix.org) by mailfe08.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPA id 363021981 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:11:58 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: working SIP phone for FreeBSD? Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:13:35 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.8.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201212251005.00376.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <201212251005.00376.hselasky@c2i.net> X-Face: 'mmZ:T{)),Oru^0c+/}w'`gU1$ubmG?lp!=R4Wy\ELYo2)@'UZ24N@d2+AyewRX}mAm; Yp |U[@, _z/([?1bCfM{_"B<.J>mICJCHAzzGHI{y7{%JVz%R~yJHIji`y>Y}k1C4TfysrsUI -%GU9V5]iUZF&nRn9mJ'?&>O MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201212251013.35624.hselasky@c2i.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 09:12:00 -0000 On Tuesday 25 December 2012 10:05:00 Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > Hi, > > Linphone has fixed support for video under FreeBSD in SVN/GIT at least. > Just google for that. There are patches you can try. > > --HPS Reference: http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2012/09/msg00060.html --HPS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 25 10:43:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B4291A for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:43:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe08.c2i.net [212.247.154.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482AC8FC17 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:43:48 +0000 (UTC) X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, BAYES_50,WEIRD_PORT Received: from [176.74.213.204] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop015.hselasky.homeunix.org) by mailfe08.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPA id 363044947 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 11:43:40 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: working SIP phone for FreeBSD? Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 11:45:16 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.8.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201212251005.00376.hselasky@c2i.net> <201212251013.35624.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <201212251013.35624.hselasky@c2i.net> X-Face: 'mmZ:T{)),Oru^0c+/}w'`gU1$ubmG?lp!=R4Wy\ELYo2)@'UZ24N@d2+AyewRX}mAm; Yp |U[@, _z/([?1bCfM{_"B<.J>mICJCHAzzGHI{y7{%JVz%R~yJHIji`y>Y}k1C4TfysrsUI -%GU9V5]iUZF&nRn9mJ'?&>O MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201212251145.16810.hselasky@c2i.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:43:49 -0000 On Tuesday 25 December 2012 10:13:35 Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Tuesday 25 December 2012 10:05:00 Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Linphone has fixed support for video under FreeBSD in SVN/GIT at least. > > Just google for that. There are patches you can try. > > > > --HPS > > Reference: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2012/09/msg00060.html > > --HPS You can try this meanwhile the maintainers fix the port: http://hselasky.homeunix.org:8192/linphone-base.tar.bz MD5 (linphone-base.tar.bz) = c721d016c57ad4d90da228dd4a2b9508 cd /usr/ports/net tar -jxvf linphone-base.tar.bz cd linphone make all deinstall install clean --HPS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 25 14:55:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A63BC9 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 14:55:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces+freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@dynect-mailer.net) Received: from mtaout-236-pao.email7.skillpagesmail.com (mtaout-236-pao.email7.skillpagesmail.com [216.146.32.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150778FC0C for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 14:55:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=MTA2; d=skillpagesmail.com; h=Subject:Sender:List-Unsubscribe:From:To:Reply-To:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type; i=no-reply@skillpagesmail.com; bh=zi3KkaBR8rUBo07T5LHvbvrKYlo=; b=mW+UKLcaPNY0eD6h/0n0jHmb37BNjwUd1vOFgH2ZlOSm96h1VDcUQAwDCpLJOfJ8bpfMDO4tMcJk t1meEl1fZjltrPVKd3fSb5i8AbjhNdOpaC5ELtGBtPOdm6eJRj2/ DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=MTA2; d=skillpagesmail.com; b=AOlHm87BXTJEMiBkFJnlcQ2B4hobjcYegyGXoDloIbtKyauNlFrUzF7zsvl1llkN3bmIBDQ4/nrG dIJqUWPZGPY4VzqTSYkeUMt37B3SHHUEdZjVx/AMpjOOeIsSHTUv; Received: from Dynect (216.146.40.12) by mtaout-236-pao.email7.skillpagesmail.com (PowerMTA(TM) v3.5r16) id hr6v6e18iesi for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 14:45:28 +0000 (envelope-from ) X-Mailer: www.skillpages.com_AU Subject: Akarshani Amarasinghe has added you on SkillPages Sender: "Akarshani Amarasinghe via SkillPages Team" X-Skillpagesmail.com-ClientID: {beb27ceb-535a-5d98-b8af-10fe42009491} X-FullCode: Invite_Invitation_{0}_NonUser EmailId: tIOyYE6hEeKkMt3gufJgkw2 Errors-To: tIOyYE6hEeKkMt3gufJgkw2@skillpagesmail.com From: "Akarshani Amarasinghe" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 14:45:27 GMT Message-ID: X-DynectEmail-Msg-Hash: m4XSjXOx+2Ns7R7tNAVfOwkJrYNh/OBK2zmgRZc7EzQ9yAwy11TVLlYsTEQGry+DzgR4x0uwOIDrrL6dUt/CogoPhJcbjY0xjCWs720r6nLSq+GkyxfuYA== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Akarshani Amarasinghe List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 14:55:35 -0000 =0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=09=0D=0A=09=09Akarshani Amarasinghe has added you on SkillPages=0D=0A=09=09=0D=0A = =0D=0A /*Only use these styles if the screen dimensions are 480= px or less*/=0D=0A @media only screen and (max-device-width: 480px= )=0D=0A {=0D=0A =09body[yahoo] .pageContainer=0D=0A =09{= =0D=0A =09=09padding-left: 10px !important;=0D=0A =09=09padding-rig= ht: 10px !important;=0D=0A =09}=0D=0A body[yahoo] .bodyCo= ntainer=0D=0A {=0D=0A width:300px !important;=0D=0A= }=0D=0A body[yahoo] .footerContainer=0D=0A = {=0D=0A padding-left:10px !important;=0D=0A = padding-right:10px !important;=0D=0A }=0D=0A = body[yahoo] .inviteDetails=0D=0A {=0D=0A =09width:= 100% !important;=0D=0A =09display: block;=0D=0A }=0D=0A=09=09= }=0D=0A =0D=0A=09=0D=0A=09=0D=0A =0D=0A =0D=0A =0D=0A = =0D=0A=09=09=09 =0D=0A=09=09=09=09 =0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09 =0D=0A = =0D=0A = =0D=0A =0D=0A = =0D=0A = =0D=0A =0D=0A = =0D=0A=09=09=09 = =0D=0A = =0D=0A =0D=0A = =0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09= =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09= =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09= =09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=09=0D=0A=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09Hi,=0D=0A=09=09=0D=0A =0D=0A=09=0D=0A=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09Become a part of your frien= d's network.=0D=0A=09=09=0D=0A=09=0D=0A=09=0D=0A=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09= =09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09Akarshani Amarasinghe=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09= =09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09Invite sent: 25 December, 2012=0D=0A=09=09= =09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=0D=0A=09=0D=0A=09=0D=0A=09=09=0D=0A Continue=0D=0A =0D=0A=09=0D=0A= =0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A= =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09= =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =0D=0A = =0D=0A =0D=0A = =0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09 =0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =0D=0A=09=09= =09=09=09=09=09=09 =0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=09=0D=0A =0D=0A =0D=0A=09 =0D=0A=09=09 = =0D=0A=09=09=09 =0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09freebsd-questions@freebsd.org was invite= d to join SkillPages by Akarshani Amarasinghe. =0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09To stop receiving= emails from SkillPages click here.=0D=0A =0D=0A=09=09 = =0D=0A=09 =0D=0A =0D=0A=09=09 =0D=0A = © 2012 SkillPages, Blackrock Business Park, Dublin, Ireland an= d 228 Hamilton Avenue, 3rd Floor, Palo Alto, CA 94301.=0D=0A = =0D=0A =0D=0A =0D=0A =0D=0A =0D=0A=0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 = =0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09=09 =0D=0A=09=09=09=09=09 =0D=0A=09=09=09=09 =0D=0A=09=09=09 = =0D=0A=09=09 =0D=0A =0D=0A =0D=0A =0D=0A=09=0D=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 25 19:13:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7351D2 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 19:13:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yavuz.maslak@ihlas.net.tr) Received: from pop3.ihlas.net.tr (pop3.ihlas.net.tr [213.238.128.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926448FC0A for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 19:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45972 invoked by uid 89); 25 Dec 2012 21:06:55 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO com2007) (yavuz.maslak@ihlas.net.tr@213.238.150.220) by pop3.ihlas.net.tr with SMTP; 25 Dec 2012 21:06:55 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-9?Q?Yavuz_Ma=FElak?= To: Subject: route issue Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:06:50 +0200 Message-ID: <063101cde2d2$fe8dd550$fba97ff0$@ihlas.net.tr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Content-Language: tr Thread-Index: Ac3i0qToiLjS2sT8QLS8uHLTyrmzcg== X-Disclaimer: ihlas.net.tr X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 19:13:40 -0000 Hello On freebsd8.2 when i run netstat -rn i see below; # netstat -rn | grep -r "127.0.0.1" 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UHS 0 1462933 lo0 As flag i think that it should be UH but on my server as above; How can i fix it ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 25 20:51:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D5D202 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 20:51:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D760D8FC0C for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 20:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TnbTh-0008IB-48 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:51:57 +0100 Received: from pool-173-79-84-117.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.84.117]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:51:57 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-84-117.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:51:57 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Subject: Re: route issue Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 15:51:53 -0500 Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: <063101cde2d2$fe8dd550$fba97ff0$@ihlas.net.tr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-84-117.washdc.fios.verizon.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 20:51:52 -0000 Yavuz Ma?lak wrote: > Hello > > > On freebsd8.2 when i run netstat -rn i see below; > > # netstat -rn | grep -r "127.0.0.1" > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UHS 0 1462933 lo0 > > As flag i think that it should be UH but on my server as above; > > How can i fix it ? Please show us your entire netstat -rn output, as well as entire ifconfig -a output, and even possibly the relevant network config lines from /etc/rc.conf too. I'm wondering if you have no other interfaces configured so it is defaulting back to this. The 'S' flag usually shows up in manually configured interfaces for network cards, e.g. NICs with an ifconfig line to activate them in /etc/rc.conf. Perhaps you are missing or have something slightly misconfigured in /etc/rc.conf. Possibilities might include no defaultrouter, hostname, etc. Note that /etc/rc.conf should be used for overriding defaults. The defaults are in /etc/defaults/rc.conf and this file should be left alone. Note the following are already in /etc/defaults/rc.conf: network_interfaces="auto" # List of network interfaces (or "auto"). ifconfig_lo0="inet 127.0.0.1" # default loopback device configuration. Maybe you have a network_interfaces=" [...] " manually listing the interfaces in /etc/rc.conf which is overriding the default "auto". Just some guessing on my part to give you some ideas. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 25 23:25:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8494A317; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 23:25:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8A68FC0A; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 23:25:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id qBPNP78j047764; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 00:25:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qBPNP7Pv047763; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 00:25:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 00:25:07 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: Chris Ross Subject: Re: Changes to kern.geom.debugflags? Message-ID: <20121225232507.GA47735@alchemy.franken.de> References: <7AA0B5D0-D49C-4D5A-8FA0-AA57C091C040@distal.com> <6A0C1005-F328-4C4C-BB83-CA463BD85127@distal.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6A0C1005-F328-4C4C-BB83-CA463BD85127@distal.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 23:25:21 -0000 On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 07:35:57PM -0500, Chris Ross wrote: > > On Dec 23, 2012, at 16:56 , Chris Ross wrote: > > I had brought up a machine months ago with freebsd-9-stable. I configured it to boot off of a single disk, with ZFS, expecting I would likely later attach the other disk to the zpool. I tried to do that today, but find that I can't write the bootloader to either disk. > > > > gpart: /dev/da0a: Operation not permitted > > > > [...] > > Okay. It occurred to me today what was likely the problem. I was running, even when single user, off of the zfs pool on the disks I was trying to write the bootloader to. > > I tar'd up /boot after my recent install from a Dec 22 9-stable, and moved it off-host. Then, I booted off of the July stable-9 CD-ROM I have in the machine, and was able to write bootblocks (with gpart bootcode) and a bootloader (dd if=/boot/zfsloader of=/dev/${disk}a bs=512 oseek=1024 conv=notrunc). > > Now, the new problem. When I try to boot my sparc64 with these bits, I see: > > >> FreeBSD/sparc64 ZFS boot block > Boot path: /pci@1c,600000/scsi@2/disk@0,0:a > Consoles: Open Firmware console > ERROR: Last Trap: Division by Zero > > {1} ok > > So, does anyone know if something has gone unstable in the sparc64 zfsboot in recent months? If I boot from the cdrom again and load the July zfsboot via gpart bootcode, it boots correctly again. > Please see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=0+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2012/freebsd-sparc64/20121223.freebsd-sparc64 and provide debug information. Marius From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 26 02:05:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A820F96; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 02:05:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cross+freebsd@distal.com) Received: from mail.distal.com (mail.distal.com [IPv6:2001:470:e24c:200::ae25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C898FC13; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 02:05:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from magrathea.distal.com (magrathea.distal.com [206.138.151.12]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.distal.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qBQ25VMn010437 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:05:32 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: Changes to kern.geom.debugflags? From: Chris Ross In-Reply-To: <20121225232507.GA47735@alchemy.franken.de> Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:05:31 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <70B79618-A645-4900-BA92-84B3C3091BF3@distal.com> References: <7AA0B5D0-D49C-4D5A-8FA0-AA57C091C040@distal.com> <6A0C1005-F328-4C4C-BB83-CA463BD85127@distal.com> <20121225232507.GA47735@alchemy.franken.de> To: Marius Strobl X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (mail.distal.com [206.138.151.250]); Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:05:32 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 02:05:36 -0000 On Dec 25, 2012, at 18:25 , Marius Strobl = wrote: >=20 > Please see > = http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=3D0+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2= 012/freebsd-sparc64/20121223.freebsd-sparc64 > and provide debug information. Thank you. I can rebuild everything with DEBUG_FLAGS=3D-g. But do I = need to do that in only boot? And, that message says: > Please use debug versions of the loaders and report the output of > `ctrace` on the boot monitor prompt. Building debug versions is > most easily done via `make DEBUG_FLAGS=3D-g` in path/to/src/boot > when building natively. You can also add the same when cross- > compiling but then you'll end up with debug versions of everything. > In both cases, make sure to not have any old object files in place. But, I'm not sure what "the boot monitor prompt" refers to, where i'm = supposed to enter "ctrace". When the boot crashes, I'm left at the open = prom. Is that where I'm supposed to enter "ctrace"? Apologies if so, I = just haven't known of that OBP command previously. Thank you. I'll try to come up with the debugging output you're = requesting. And more directions would be appreciated. - Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 26 07:28:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D21285 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:28:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jan0sch@gmx.net) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832848FC14 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.27]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M6hJq-1Stc172SYu-00wTM1 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 08:28:17 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Dec 2012 07:28:17 -0000 Received: from dslb-088-072-242-114.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO magni.rostock.home) [88.72.242.114] by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 26 Dec 2012 08:28:17 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1545395 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+ZM2NC5MKZd4ORZk8ZSY4/wmN83z4iIvL7wJ2yys 6h4HxMGZr3qkx/ Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 08:27:55 +0100 From: Jens Jahnke To: David Naylor Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.20 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) Message-Id: <20121226082755.ee1d4a3077742aa0ff1638e2@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <201212241227.15165.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> References: <201212241227.15165.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) X-Face: &?!P`87-36gaG)/K:yi&ixw=uy]y'?$vrc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA512"; boundary="Signature=_Wed__26_Dec_2012_08_27_55_+0100_eS0ICN0K1Kc.OU9e" X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:28:24 -0000 --Signature=_Wed__26_Dec_2012_08_27_55_+0100_eS0ICN0K1Kc.OU9e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 12:27:11 +0200 David Naylor wrote: DN> Since it is possible to install the existing pkg=20 DN> packages in a pkgng environment (which I do) this is not a high DN> priority. is there a documentation for that? I searched the pkgng docs but found nothing regarding installation of "old" packages or converting them to a newer version. Regards, Jens --=20 26. Julmond 2012, 08:27 Homepage : http://www.jan0sch.de What the world *really* needs is a good Automatic Bicycle Sharpener. --Signature=_Wed__26_Dec_2012_08_27_55_+0100_eS0ICN0K1Kc.OU9e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQG8BAEBCgAGBQJQ2qcPAAoJED2+SXzzbciG9dkM/A4WM+QGiq6P4+gVLPBf45Xn d0W95tdUfaCKPk4TvpTtN+y//JZAZ+R2LFApBpN64jxTzXHd+tIG2E6iJRGaYT6V WacbUOtjnURwzzfA2NSfOtSpvE1CeZbW5S/f+zCcrpawzGVeXyJD+ufBuplea1Ri 97iB6PYaHM7QCk3WsS+z/yGrtQoGvZ0n4xrDCn4xwp2mWvtB58vuhPNUFApaaEPY Xs0hCeFoNGP8PtX4NDuuE8KAjwY4uEQp8FFTQ1/G6vn53XeJ6beB4Mw3IayTkkDQ 5XriveIDx8jE84akDkbVP0DyVbjMx9elyxRrPoN8bKAp5BGoCLYY4NRtu6QSK5C+ j18cczJDMGHZ5dpJCdTiaZYpQVdFEJIfwJNWII8dHKTXK2Rkp/TJ440OaDcPiobf gT/H9u+oXMDvo+kpsDg/tA9NeD05uUORIsJiCh2B3vtpPy+5mXU4kf7/gYpCF6lo niY4bfxQ+IHPyznotFA2QH4IOOUCtESekNOBD0TR1gDiycbSWgKKkvSD8HapuJtl 4Wvh+d43jfsVwalhkBEH =l0Lq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Wed__26_Dec_2012_08_27_55_+0100_eS0ICN0K1Kc.OU9e-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 26 07:55:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4773488C for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:55:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58588FC0C for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBQ7t7NR071681 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:55:08 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk qBQ7t7NR071681 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/qBQ7t7NR071681; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Message-ID: <50DAAD52.4020004@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:54:58 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.20 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) References: <201212241227.15165.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> <20121226082755.ee1d4a3077742aa0ff1638e2@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20121226082755.ee1d4a3077742aa0ff1638e2@gmx.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig380476FC551039F4D8590315" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:55:20 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig380476FC551039F4D8590315 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 26/12/2012 07:27, Jens Jahnke wrote: > On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 12:27:11 +0200 > David Naylor wrote: >=20 > DN> Since it is possible to install the existing pkg=20 > DN> packages in a pkgng environment (which I do) this is not a high > DN> priority. >=20 > is there a documentation for that? I searched the pkgng docs but found > nothing regarding installation of "old" packages or converting them to > a newer version. There's nothing in pkg_tools to stop it working on a pkgng-enabled system. This does not mean that installing pkg_tools packages in that situation is in any way supported or encouraged. If you do this, you will create a mess on your systems and store up a nasty job of sorting it all out for yourself. It really isn't a good idea. I know there is a lack of availability of official pre-compiled packages from the FreeBSD project at the moment. This is an unfortunate consequence of the security problem in November, and all I can do is ask for your patience as the situation gets sorted out. In the mean time, the best advice is to compile your own. Either directly from ports, by using portmaster or portupgrade or else by using an off-line package building system like poudriere or tinderbox[*]. Cheers, Matthew [*] You need tinderbox-devel for pkgng support, or the upcoming 4.0.0 release. --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig380476FC551039F4D8590315 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDarVsACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwtkQCglVFENqO8ZLVm9kpMMDQ4ImLu 76EAniHBrdabaX2Q8vAoU6qDkwK0JVXZ =C1hH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig380476FC551039F4D8590315-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 26 10:19:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB88DFD for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 10:19:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jan0sch@gmx.net) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0B38FC0C for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 10:19:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.36]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M7FY8-1Ssxvx14eU-00x2wV for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:19:31 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Dec 2012 10:19:30 -0000 Received: from dslb-088-072-242-114.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO magni.rostock.home) [88.72.242.114] by mail.gmx.net (mp036) with SMTP; 26 Dec 2012 11:19:30 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1545395 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19LjX8vOV5LrSll8iK9odl8kZUzwRQBMcD78uJuQX LFpsbQtZaBdo7t Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:19:22 +0100 From: Jens Jahnke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.20 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) Message-Id: <20121226111922.e33586cb611e6d47e94fd9d7@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <50DAAD52.4020004@FreeBSD.org> References: <201212241227.15165.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> <20121226082755.ee1d4a3077742aa0ff1638e2@gmx.net> <50DAAD52.4020004@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) X-Face: &?!P`87-36gaG)/K:yi&ixw=uy]y'?$vrc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA512"; boundary="Signature=_Wed__26_Dec_2012_11_19_22_+0100_dUoI.UFyZGMNKq.K" X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 10:19:38 -0000 --Signature=_Wed__26_Dec_2012_11_19_22_+0100_dUoI.UFyZGMNKq.K Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:54:58 +0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: MS> On 26/12/2012 07:27, Jens Jahnke wrote: MS> > On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 12:27:11 +0200 MS> > David Naylor wrote: MS> >=20 MS> > DN> Since it is possible to install the existing pkg=20 MS> > DN> packages in a pkgng environment (which I do) this is not a MS> > DN> high priority. MS> >=20 MS> > is there a documentation for that? I searched the pkgng docs but MS> > found nothing regarding installation of "old" packages or MS> > converting them to a newer version. MS>=20 MS> There's nothing in pkg_tools to stop it working on a pkgng-enabled MS> system. This does not mean that installing pkg_tools packages in MS> that situation is in any way supported or encouraged. If you do MS> this, you will create a mess on your systems and store up a nasty MS> job of sorting it all out for yourself. It really isn't a good MS> idea. Thanks for the advise. I guessed in that direction. So I'll be patient and wait for packages because I've never been able to build wine (64bit) myself from source. I just need it for some old games anyway. ;) Regards, Jens --=20 26. Julmond 2012, 11:13 Homepage : http://www.jan0sch.de All my friends and I are crazy. That's the only thing that keeps us sane. --Signature=_Wed__26_Dec_2012_11_19_22_+0100_dUoI.UFyZGMNKq.K Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQG8BAEBCgAGBQJQ2s8qAAoJED2+SXzzbciGxJoM/1L/r7poX8KK9l8ZYS62WHPK uPT6AIPetl2QjsprZ2OQRj7TWJq2fanH7MERd7zl8n4ZkteJPSzmIDPeEPjGSghz SghsZ10QFvqlV1X1XJiygc+8hi+bF/nSILSf7zDxYqWQHw31QPTR9W5VXXAaLG6P BqD8D06NOstOZxETgKjDQDr3Mn4lBNWaaax6cAxQOyf1uk7uWFDPkE4srGX3Hgvv zNZxEdLXBvfDnlULHvm4Faj9QQzQkFC6log1DWkMB4NirN5zmMEUhSGflCRfztBL 9KO+7zdlF/dQMa1pPUNweY9/O/NuSI8pxCU01nRziUGzJS8b9Vz5zL7iBwpUWPt7 DlZBxUUWKtuMiRS3ruQCc4j+vYKVPdpQTs6bnwDLVdtulekvXmdUfzJdLkdqBGwJ +N1Vp+G5Eij4c9l9f0MMy8Zj3yMpaavUSr70YguTAPu2Z5vyb0YoHibLrcthquml SEsx/Yi+HvZBXRU/MRIBJ9bR9N64vA3Nvc+Y06C1ecBw8V/lDu+w9kzDl0lvk3H1 7vKGufb9ntqbJafRcYTF =i3If -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Wed__26_Dec_2012_11_19_22_+0100_dUoI.UFyZGMNKq.K-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 26 14:09:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58BBE62D for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:09:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from boyrules@live.com) Received: from dub0-omc4-s11.dub0.hotmail.com (dub0-omc4-s11.dub0.hotmail.com [157.55.2.86]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9018FC0C for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:09:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DUB113-W45 ([157.55.2.73]) by dub0-omc4-s11.dub0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 26 Dec 2012 06:08:27 -0800 X-EIP: [uuXr2aO0GkNENSjEigwpyLBONN+65bM6] X-Originating-Email: [boyrules@live.com] Message-ID: From: BOY RULES To: Subject: i want to order one software Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:08:27 +0000 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Dec 2012 14:08:27.0649 (UTC) FILETIME=[7A044710:01CDE372] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:09:36 -0000 Hi there guys i want to order one software if possible to use on Linux ma= chines =20 freeBSD=2C Ubuntu=2C Centos=2C Debian and Fedora=20 the software i want is to use as DNS Network=2C WWW hostname add=2C direct= ories=2C www folder listview=2C hostnames hosted on the servers=20 to start=20 DNS Network ----> each machine connects to each machine and read writes h= osts to the www from each machine to be AIO=20 add dns IP and Hostname from Ubuntu=2C freeBSD=2C centos=2C debian=2C windo= ws=2C mac and will be remoted to each one=20 DNS Mysql ----> the database to each machine to read from each machine d= atabases if one dataabase is down other machine runs it=20 www directory ----> diferent www directories like install on the 1st H= DD and use other HDD for host the sites and files=20 i will install the operation system on SSD disk and use Sata HDD to hos= ting files =20 SSD 128 GB =3D operation system freeBSD=20 HDD 1 =3D videos/www/ HDD 2 =3D hosting/www/ HDD 3 =3D music/www/ and so on to be like this way =20 one software to add hostname to the directory add IP address add hostname= choose port choose the file to run on server index php=20 and click save and its up and running the site on the server=20 on webvrowsers to make sure just shows the domain name http://www.domain.c= om <------ this way =20 if possible one software similar ad MAC Admin Tools Tiger server=20 add one Listview videos/www directory list and combobox choose the d= irectory to view all the websites and hosting files=20 one listview to change chmod permisions click on the checkbox file 755= and change on text 777 and save permissions=20 its that possible add wine on feebsd to be already in feebsd dont need t= o intall after already comes with wine=20 i would like to know is if i install wine on freebsd and use exe files c= reated in VB net it will work 100%=20 i know a bit of VB net and i want to build my applications to use on linux = =20 can you help me to build this type of software and i will pay for it i wan= t to pay this software to be mine =20 i can send you the application made in VB net the ideas i had built to use= =20 if you accept it i will send you the source code in VB net=20 let me know if you want to build the software i need for use on linux mach= ines thanks=20 = From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 26 21:17:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB60C9BE for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 21:17:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mhca12@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f49.google.com (mail-oa0-f49.google.com [209.85.219.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2058FC12 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 21:17:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id l10so8289982oag.22 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:17:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=I8Hfdg6jEA9/uaxJehC8QN2WhGDxc4kkNTCTbaWNaW4=; b=nNMXsyp0QzMPzG1dPvKhEVe0ZrwsBmtgeR+TFXiUa3/h+wb5FAylDMO32hfca9Dw/E E+28Hq5IXEFA9qyfj9335ElgNpLLmncAzH/A8l+i0ZB6j1h2i1Ea1VA01R/dyVhe/kxO fcRApHlhpS2Ct+SwmkXNYr0xICPiiRoPnZyZPcFxjuF8izCQIeSI76S/AXj7SG02Ekhj YQzLtj+/AJFJU6WQ3lrNz7vSXFUBI+i5JDbDZ7SRYLS1iiITqEYgqyVPfmevJDIYvW1T 0/mSXcbKg0yK1p+5YFDqUG4GBJrAORLoeBten6yu7ebdHG6tcNNLJap/kXvjhg80appS O3bA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.146.107 with SMTP id tb11mr23176862obb.30.1356556641298; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:17:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.34.73 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:17:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 22:17:21 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Full disk encryption without root partition From: mhca12 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 21:17:27 -0000 Are there any plans or is there already support for full disk encryption without the need for a root partition? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 26 21:18:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4A7A56 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 21:18:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mhca12@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f43.google.com (mail-oa0-f43.google.com [209.85.219.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4AB8FC0C for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 21:18:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id k1so8409444oag.30 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:18:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=7ZoAN+q9RmiXrCbxbfiogTz7iiM7IBhXalPsyanAMjk=; b=Z43Q/4dd4LvktrRjcNRradvqOJOzNvNX8GrlHE0L1hQO8nwqm0LSlUzmDz3gxfI9jT ZdygyCEORssc4YMBYIhhTznkS/AjXGFAYnAb6homPiLbhXzWa7CpEMhZdJoK7YRHh3qn gd3ja3RN/StX4x94RbxHclaVEiK5IfLwt2m23raorqLSGA/sMTphVp4+eEWLRieB/5DI 924GxDQOkNH6f34vB1AyuAcx4yqhwqfbOwRsqWhReBBtLXwvQgya5N/+CJu3psTkoQ3x 6haMJS9UvXMNeKezMVxNGHBB9thMVgU5XDp3eePkCdNRM013S3ljdhoKGlgjrhhnjROF B1pA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.177.72 with SMTP id co8mr23405570obc.53.1356556720577; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:18:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.34.73 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:18:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 22:18:40 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Full disk encryption without root partition From: mhca12 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 21:18:46 -0000 On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:17 PM, mhca12 wrote: > Are there any plans or is there already support for full > disk encryption without the need for a root partition? I am sorry, I certainly meant to write "boot partition". From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 27 07:36:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C549694D for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 07:36:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jack.mclauren@yahoo.com) Received: from nm20.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm20.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.212.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F838FC0A for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 07:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.215.143] by nm20.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Dec 2012 07:36:38 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.214] by tm14.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Dec 2012 07:36:38 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1023.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Dec 2012 07:36:38 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 211532.12905.bm@omp1023.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 49051 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Dec 2012 07:36:38 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1356593797; bh=BC+yVs7WwVgpOlMkyyNQNkwBs8lhS5iIasa/z5P0+AI=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TgCqAM4Hm58ZBKr3iDhLtPRxQBmfgoobnASZmmi9ILVU5DlkSWC6k/hmjlu0uCNIRFa3c8oJd+/+JB1qcLy/FPUMac3zC+nXXUzrG54pUtxgKtIjKItmWipdMPgjI+Zgt/UV90ZqyrqsVljbPEM2B7EKzAlkvJVY+bqn+vjt/lE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WeC+Jk7qIcV66PQteyMG0m5rLsNQJZhudi2AVgU1O4iD9lmDvlrGsk+SeVU1fJJo7ZMYfg+8Zy0SOOGnAdXfEYnsQLq9glzMkQyyfm+NUGfwts71FVF4mp0bORDWW4BlU2yQCLvSfN9gxPpVYpi5nYCHh3AZIC9XmSWIKzFVQRU=; X-YMail-OSG: Q89eegMVM1mat3AmePYc1Uiw0_0BK99.4FpVOdPnF1aR.Wk ETXpi4RcKw5rguwWHFxem0bwKD6UWRnqzEi7ApNcd7iOY.VI4AJwTYzJ1DBp KBeLTuto_fEHNQH9RURUiFbVFyfkUpBFTSpsGHPSQ7d6W1UkTIX6yWUNPiy3 1tMTNWUOhv81r37LMxEweZY2Xs0c4SmAXxVWJvSG2OamWJyrxI.FVi0tJSer OdsotwcEZyfkvkzkmQGNVt0kPkIc8a.tKcO31MFzVmBZ.KwXjFKTZytP9Yo. nK6H_SG9kRN8cl_2tf454fPcGQdE4Q1mkK0OnnS_KO.yuP0NZ3EQH4pQHLYG dZXg90YqjGNE_.2krd2ZBA8pB0h4ttkdvkVLu59Wmn4RgqBp_GFTJPEx_eju 8d0VE7o_f5NdqC73uPBmkG2o66WufmqEk9Z_ntzAZfFQK0Owb5HR31WPKlFU - Received: from [89.165.120.140] by web160105.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 23:36:37 PST X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001, SGkgZ3V5cwoKVGFrZSBhIGxvb2sgdG8gdGhlIGNvZGUgYmVsb3cgOgoKI2luY2x1ZGUgPGlvc3RyZWFtPgojaW5jbHVkZSA8c3RyaW5nLmg.CiNpbmNsdWRlIDxpbmlwYXJzZXIuaD4KI2luY2x1ZGUgPGRpY3Rpb25hcnkuaD4KCnVzaW5nIG5hbWVzcGFjZSBzdGQ7CgppbnQgbWFpbigpCnsKwqAgwqAgZGljdGlvbmFyeSAqZGljdCA9IG5ldyBkaWN0aW9uYXJ5OwrCoCDCoCBkaXJlbnQgKmRpciA9IG5ldyBkaXJlbnQ7CsKgIMKgIGNoYXIgKmM7CsKgIMKgIGRpY3QgPSBpbmlwYXJzZXJfbG9hZCgiL3RtcC90ZXMBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.129.483 Message-ID: <1356593797.48993.YahooMailNeo@web160105.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 23:36:37 -0800 (PST) From: Jack Mc Lauren Subject: using iniparser.h To: FreeBSD Global Users Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jack Mc Lauren List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 07:36:44 -0000 Hi guys=0A=0ATake a look to the code below :=0A=0A#include =0A#in= clude =0A#include =0A#include =0A=0Aus= ing namespace std;=0A=0Aint main()=0A{=0A=A0 =A0 dictionary *dict =3D new d= ictionary;=0A=A0 =A0 dirent *dir =3D new dirent;=0A=A0 =A0 char *c;=0A=A0 = =A0 dict =3D iniparser_load("/tmp/test.ini");=0A=A0 =A0 c =3D iniparser_get= string(dict,"s","w");=0A=A0 =A0 cin.get();=0A=A0 =A0 return 0;=0A}=0A=0AI h= ave this error :=0A=0A***main.cpp:17: undefined reference to `iniparser_loa= d'=0A***/main.cpp:18: undefined reference to `iniparser_getstring'=0A=0Aany= suggestions ?=0A=0AThanks in advance ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 27 08:31:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78437524 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 08:31:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5768FC0C for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 08:31:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id qBR8Ur0c041990; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 02:30:53 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 02:30:53 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201212270830.qBR8Ur0c041990@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, jack.mclauren@yahoo.com Subject: Re: using iniparser.h In-Reply-To: <1356593797.48993.YahooMailNeo@web160105.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 08:31:03 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Dec 27 01:39:38 2012 > Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 23:36:37 -0800 (PST) > From: Jack Mc Lauren > Subject: using iniparser.h > To: FreeBSD Global Users Mailing List > > Hi guys > > Take a look to the code below : > > #include > #include > #include > #include > > using namespace std; > > int main() > { > dictionary *dict = new dictionary; > dirent *dir = new dirent; > char *c; > dict = iniparser_load("/tmp/test.ini"); > c = iniparser_getstring(dict,"s","w"); > cin.get(); > return 0; > } > > I have this error : > > ***main.cpp:17: undefined reference to `iniparser_load' > ***/main.cpp:18: undefined reference to `iniparser_getstring' > > any suggestions ? a) your code doesn't match the errors -- 3-4 lines missing. b) did you specify the iniparser lib when you tried to compile ? > > Thanks in advance ... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 27 09:56:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161F13B9; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:56:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jack@jarasoft.net) Received: from orac.jarasoft.net (orac.jarasoft.net [37.34.58.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2208FC08; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:56:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orac.jarasoft.net (orac.jarasoft.net [37.34.58.13]) by orac.jarasoft.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D200E10A0B5; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:53:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from jarasc430 (raats.xs4all.nl [82.95.230.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by orac.jarasoft.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D164109F67; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:53:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <10CAB5BED66A49CBAF20A9DE02CAC3DD@jarasc430> From: "Jack Raats" To: , Subject: FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:53:23 +0100 Organization: Jack Raats, JaRaSoft, Steenbergen, Nederland MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on orac.jarasoft.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jack Raats List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:56:18 -0000 Hi, In this mailinglist I'm reading a lot about problems (re)compiling the = system. At this moment I'm running: "FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE (ORAC) #0 r244047: Sun Dec 9 15:33:19 CET 2012" = without problems. Is it save to recompile the system with all patches? Thanks Jack Raats From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 27 10:59:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF57655B for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:59:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7AF8FC12 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:59:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1ToBB2-000tI5-DC>; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 11:59:04 +0100 Received: from e178032053.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.32.53] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1ToBB2-003ke0-9i>; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 11:59:04 +0100 Message-ID: <50DC29F1.1070500@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 11:58:57 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: PPPOED: reading data of line quality from the A/DSL modem X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig711268CDB3161CB27EA57A5D" X-Originating-IP: 85.178.32.53 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:59:05 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig711268CDB3161CB27EA57A5D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable When using modern SoGo A/DSL routers, most devices do have fancy GUIs and information screens about the settings of the device and especially the line quality, like SNR, dampening et cetera. In my private office, I've setup a FreeBSD server acting like a gateway/router, replacing my oldish non-IPv6 capable ADSL modem/router. Using a secondary NIC connecting to the ADSL modem via PPPOED, I'd like to read some of the important statistsics from the device's chipset like line quality informations. Sometimes our line here go bad and with the setup at the moment, I can not check what's wrong. Also, I have no informations about the actual up- and downstream speed, which is also important to me. Since most professional/commercial ADSL routers/modems use opensource software, most prefereably Linux, I was wondering if there isn't a way to achieve those data from FreeBSD as well. I prefer the system's tools in favour over a port installation, but if there is a sophisticated software, I would appreciate a hint or tip. Thanks, Oliver P.S. Please set me CC, I do not subscribe this list. --------------enig711268CDB3161CB27EA57A5D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ3Cn4AAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8vsMIANkh9B+hvPAJ4g4vIab29vLz dm285Miqsyli+UobiHQommAPcXuLsGrXbcABoCT1q1fdsvYFcRIdZ3n1AM6xXa6d n1hrKejB1I0StNRL7aSnUkiey+fARaqplk9YAwkAtnPZAeWYnXURqarOgYa8X5vx yRZ1s1IOKCYZBJfUnJSWX38BQvGGvZT1J/az5bHoQyP3FZRdJT/z7yOfDtmKNEeo RDYWsq+UWk6cSMhvber1XhsXPCHiPB/0kC9+uzZtz71f0mMG2Kmawl4YcX/21jyP g7nhCmP/mVha+VpEr3LbVrPyympTu0XVgIDREVYCmtVzrkN7HALGz8Tmu+RjLC4= =IaQE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig711268CDB3161CB27EA57A5D-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 27 11:43:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80772B00 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 11:43:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@vereshagin.org) Received: from mx1.skyriver.ru (ns1.skyriver.ru [89.108.118.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E088FC08 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 11:43:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [95.170.88.81]) by mx1.skyriver.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9BAD05A92; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:35:20 +0400 (MSK) Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:34:25 +0400 From: Peter Vereshagin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PPPOED: reading data of line quality from the A/DSL modem Message-ID: <20121227113425.GB5388@external.screwed.box> References: <50DC29F1.1070500@zedat.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50DC29F1.1070500@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Organization: ' X-Face: 8T>{1owI$Byj]]a; ^G]kRf*dkq>E-3':F>4ODP[#X4s"dr?^b&2G@'3lukno]A1wvJ_L(~u 6>I2ra/<,j1%@C[LN=>p#_}RIV+#:KTszp-X$bQOj,K Cc: "O. Hartmann" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 11:43:10 -0000 Hello. 2012/12/27 11:58:57 +0100 "O. Hartmann" => To freebsd-questions@freebsd.org : OH> When using modern SoGo A/DSL routers, most devices do have fancy GUIs SoHo? Or 'SoGo' is a brand? OH> and information screens about the settings of the device and especially OH> the line quality, like SNR, dampening et cetera. OH> OH> In my private office, I've setup a FreeBSD server acting like a OH> gateway/router, replacing my oldish non-IPv6 capable ADSL modem/router. OH> Using a secondary NIC connecting to the ADSL modem via PPPOED, I'd like OH> to read some of the important statistsics from the device's chipset like OH> line quality informations. Sometimes our line here go bad and with the OH> setup at the moment, I can not check what's wrong. OH> OH> Also, I have no informations about the actual up- and downstream speed, OH> which is also important to me. OH> Since most professional/commercial ADSL routers/modems use opensource OH> software, most prefereably Linux, I was wondering if there isn't a way OH> to achieve those data from FreeBSD as well. I prefer the system's tools It is not clear if you want to install FreeBSD on your modem? That depends on its model. OH> in favour over a port installation, but if there is a sophisticated OH> software, I would appreciate a hint or tip. It's kind of unlikely that FreeBSD 'base system' does have a tool(s) to measure the DSL quality characteristics. Depending on your modem's model you can have a telnet(1) interface to it from your FreeBSD server to look up for line quality information via modem's specific commands by hand. But telnet(1) doesn't seem to be the notifying tool you think you need. It should be nothing complicated to make such a tool or install the ready-to-use software from the FreeBSD Ports system. Same can go here about the web interface your modem can be controlled by saying not about the telnet(1) but about web browser, correspondently. -- Peter Vereshagin (http://vereshagin.org) pgp: 1754B9C1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 27 13:34:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8AF2E7; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 13:34:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpaasial@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (mail-wi0-f177.google.com [209.85.212.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F1A8FC0A; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 13:34:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id hm2so5356478wib.4 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 05:34:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Y9PTL3VHwExZsPnT0jPW+QSVQBMSF5ZwSzAD1thAFng=; b=UQsXXN6a5KjPGQ8p/4rqW9CgCQzB10oWb/JpUv4Niky/fvIWUpPAQL9xpfZXf+Dv6M LGh2P7K6G7Tjpn24OiDIlx/1VlnoM1zTbHXV52km6X8eDmc3cOGS2K/V7y1p7iQbd5LC 5DJNCwbMVhKvXEhSbZmNlO/qKmniVrhQEtbS4hY3tvvqzqvRU6JCSfbm2NA/0ExrCcKp XxQUAYOAXp9d0wNs0eRP3eng8OpS4RvhSgCjbpkmQZ3P+BKEs0uUHXB4GHOvXWohA1dk khlgIlNPQQijeuHE2czSnReGLQ74xEdGWVk7ps5YvA+R1ddnPGDlscvid3cAS0SYp9rq ocFQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.21.70 with SMTP id t6mr48871511wje.42.1356615260283; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 05:34:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.172.197 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 05:34:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <10CAB5BED66A49CBAF20A9DE02CAC3DD@jarasc430> References: <10CAB5BED66A49CBAF20A9DE02CAC3DD@jarasc430> Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:34:20 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE From: Kimmo Paasiala To: Jack Raats Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 13:34:27 -0000 On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Jack Raats wrote: > Hi, > > In this mailinglist I'm reading a lot about problems (re)compiling the system. At this moment I'm running: > "FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE (ORAC) #0 r244047: Sun Dec 9 15:33:19 CET 2012" without problems. > > Is it save to recompile the system with all patches? > > Thanks > Jack Raats > _______________________________________________ You're seeing just the "tip of the iceberg" meaning only those who do have problems building the OS from sources and are following the mailing lists post on them. There's potentially thousands or even much more of those who are following 9-STABLE and never encounter a problem they can not solve on their own. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 27 15:49:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A317BDE0 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:49:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi.sergio@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gh0-f182.google.com (mail-gh0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530948FC0A for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-gh0-f182.google.com with SMTP id z15so948960ghb.41 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 07:49:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references :disposition-notification-to:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer; bh=sNUlKC1iPv3xf/rhOkFrp8q5Az3z0AJUm15qhZlnzj8=; b=OAOoWJ1HNsVPufmkEjBxlAhD7FHwLvaEdI7ErNI+1KU2HcI/NmE/U8z59T5xGGS4p9 M/vDPcpH0D5xbakT8BRe48149Ef/h5YmYf3qd/Id4XJKr7JG/Bs5DDjhFKRIL88XIU1U 1/Zq5/XVvkewQBFez3oQyJXSy8T9y8aN0my6L2S3VF51f3YvW+imcW4UbyB42jiLnBOR wnv+Nms2fHtMSYmOfA5Z2jNRd7YRV91pj3Z411kJjm/tlifZYcUtKpOKqzQCVcTwUrS8 ybQZujMv0qdcvfulZ3lwmMVZrSQ8SGZWrN2erf+kd3gcIiv3m5QqA4D+lG7InwCDfEJt /fDQ== X-Received: by 10.236.137.17 with SMTP id x17mr25201781yhi.77.1356623365268; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 07:49:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.6.230] ([189.123.205.219]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u49sm27740477yhd.18.2012.12.27.07.49.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 27 Dec 2012 07:49:24 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE From: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <10CAB5BED66A49CBAF20A9DE02CAC3DD@jarasc430> References: <10CAB5BED66A49CBAF20A9DE02CAC3DD@jarasc430> Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 13:49:21 -0200 Message-ID: <1356623361.26983.5.camel@z6000.lenzicasa> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:49:32 -0000 Em Qui, 2012-12-27 às 10:53 +0100, Jack Raats escreveu: > Hi, > > In this mailinglist I'm reading a lot about problems (re)compiling the system. At this moment I'm running: > "FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE (ORAC) #0 r244047: Sun Dec 9 15:33:19 CET 2012" without problems. > > Is it save to recompile the system with all patches? Here I use the svn to fetch the src than I build a config (xxxx) file in /sys/amd64/conf than go to /usr/src make sure there is an user named auditdistd in /etc/master.passwd ==>auditdistd:*:78:77::0:0:Auditdistd unprivileged user:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin export KERNCONF=xxxx make buildworkld && make buildkernel then make installworld installkernel if your config ===> xxxx is correct, Should work From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 27 17:06:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6A43B5; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 17:06:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cross+freebsd@distal.com) Received: from mail1.markmonitor.com (mail1.markmonitor.com [209.66.70.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EDD8FC0A; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 17:06:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.markmonitor.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCAC17A4C; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:43:37 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at markmonitor.com Received: from mail1.markmonitor.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.mm-corp.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id VNKRE5x7SyrV; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:43:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from sfoexch3.mm-ads.com (unknown [10.111.51.241]) by mail1.markmonitor.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B0117A28; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:43:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from dc-exch4.mm-ads.com ([10.112.0.225]) by sfoexch3.mm-ads.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 27 Dec 2012 07:43:32 -0800 Received: from zalamar.mm-corp.net ([10.112.52.72]) by dc-exch4.mm-ads.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:43:30 -0500 Subject: Re: Changes to kern.geom.debugflags? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Chris Ross In-Reply-To: <20121225232507.GA47735@alchemy.franken.de> Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:43:27 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8D01A854-97D9-4F1F-906A-7AB59BF8850B@distal.com> References: <7AA0B5D0-D49C-4D5A-8FA0-AA57C091C040@distal.com> <6A0C1005-F328-4C4C-BB83-CA463BD85127@distal.com> <20121225232507.GA47735@alchemy.franken.de> To: Marius Strobl X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Dec 2012 15:43:30.0952 (UTC) FILETIME=[EBDD0080:01CDE448] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 17:06:19 -0000 On Dec 25, 2012, at 6:25 PM, Marius Strobl wrote: >> So, does anyone know if something has gone unstable in the sparc64 = zfsboot in recent months? If I boot from the cdrom again and load the = July zfsboot via gpart bootcode, it boots correctly again. >>=20 >=20 > Please see > = http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=3D0+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2= 012/freebsd-sparc64/20121223.freebsd-sparc64 > and provide debug information. I built the world with DEBUG_FLAGS=3D-g, and installed new zfsboot and = zfsloader on my sparc64. However, "ctrace" isn't helpful: >> FreeBSD/sparc64 ZFS boot block Boot path: /pci@1c,600000/scsi@2/disk@1,0:a Consoles: Open Firmware console =20 ERROR: Last Trap: Division by Zero {1} ok ctrace No saved state {1} ok=20 Anything else you can suggest to get debugging information out of = zfsloader? - Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 27 21:31:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2F4C20 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 21:31:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@musl.org) Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com (mail-ee0-f46.google.com [74.125.83.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8F48FC0A for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 21:31:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f46.google.com with SMTP id e53so4842509eek.19 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 13:31:49 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=rm5+wAVx+WFwE4774AtzcgrroYdI8dWALvgLCeGx44k=; b=XFVnLQkgQBHncwtDIrp83eVT45pzlVCHs+cK/YaSpK6XDaAjnojm/w5ugzzopSkVXx YJHlGgSVni99BqgVHTA4FIuSKYuCdvXYRCkJtPNLmkSs0wnquvNVXpYnVNp1YstI82gJ eTwVxhzJgt9THTDym3Q2i/gp28jzN798DO01nQupWFJfYRbLASMSzpEGCPN74FIRpKyg jgDJZhVTKI7pwFdw2px2u0V4pPH3RDydsAvfqOT5NqYcprlktJNlCdKrlONhb2yZW5NU /Rl7RCCOQy5MFy8iEZkXOVHa2yCQ1ylCZozckhB+BEk/K9z5sDHZLeOrpSTXNKym7zz0 mkpw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.2.196 with SMTP id 44mr80464213eef.25.1356643909410; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 13:31:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.182.137 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 13:31:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 13:31:49 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: ixgbe ALTQ support on 9.1-RELEASE From: Mike Hix To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmNjW+XV3NIHcaifzrC6HrVuqw3VmLqMiSp0FnskXrCc+vc1UPN0UWUukSQTDciD2ezMlWq X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 21:31:56 -0000 Should ixgbe 2.4.8 (supplied with 9.1-RELEASE) support ALTQ? My card: ix0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0xa12c8086 chip=0x150b8086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82598EB 10-Gigabit AT2 Server Adapter' class = network subclass = ethernet I've successfully built a kernel with altq suppport. altq works with other drivers on this system. However when attempting to load a pf rule set that includes queueing for this NIC, it fails with the following message: pfctl: ix0: driver does not support altq altq(4) lists ixgbe under the SUPPORTED DEVICES secction. Is there some alternative to altq, or is there some other knob/sysctl/step I'm missing? -- Mike Hix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 28 00:42:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CCED60 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:42:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@gmx.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415C98FC15 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:42:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout-eu.gmx.com ([10.1.101.215]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Mfl5W-1TRF0y1caC-00NEO2 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 01:42:44 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2012 00:42:44 -0000 Received: from 188.4.241.172.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr (EHLO [192.168.1.77]) [188.4.241.172] by mail.gmx.com (mp-eu015) with SMTP; 28 Dec 2012 01:42:44 +0100 X-Authenticated: #46156728 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/BgDFss0HB0NFIWaCLNgMeq7cyHkU7nLG4gR24yA 17ax2wXV3hh2pE Message-ID: <50DCEAFE.3030806@gmx.com> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 02:42:38 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Vereshagin , "O. Hartmann" Subject: Re: PPPOED: reading data of line quality from the A/DSL modem References: <50DC29F1.1070500@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20121227113425.GB5388@external.screwed.box> In-Reply-To: <20121227113425.GB5388@external.screwed.box> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:42:45 -0000 On 12/27/2012 1:34 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote: > Hello. > > 2012/12/27 11:58:57 +0100 "O. Hartmann" => To freebsd-questions@freebsd.org : > OH> When using modern SoGo A/DSL routers, most devices do have fancy GUIs > > SoHo? Or 'SoGo' is a brand? > > OH> and information screens about the settings of the device and especially > OH> the line quality, like SNR, dampening et cetera. > OH> > OH> In my private office, I've setup a FreeBSD server acting like a > OH> gateway/router, replacing my oldish non-IPv6 capable ADSL modem/router. > OH> Using a secondary NIC connecting to the ADSL modem via PPPOED, I'd like > OH> to read some of the important statistsics from the device's chipset like > OH> line quality informations. Sometimes our line here go bad and with the > OH> setup at the moment, I can not check what's wrong. > OH> > OH> Also, I have no informations about the actual up- and downstream speed, > OH> which is also important to me. > OH> Since most professional/commercial ADSL routers/modems use opensource > OH> software, most prefereably Linux, I was wondering if there isn't a way > OH> to achieve those data from FreeBSD as well. I prefer the system's tools > > It is not clear if you want to install FreeBSD on your modem? That depends on > its model. > > OH> in favour over a port installation, but if there is a sophisticated > OH> software, I would appreciate a hint or tip. > > It's kind of unlikely that FreeBSD 'base system' does have a tool(s) to > measure the DSL quality characteristics. Depending on your modem's model you > can have a telnet(1) interface to it from your FreeBSD server to look up for > line quality information via modem's specific commands by hand. > > But telnet(1) doesn't seem to be the notifying tool you think you need. It > should be nothing complicated to make such a tool or install the ready-to-use > software from the FreeBSD Ports system. > > Same can go here about the web interface your modem can be controlled by > saying not about the telnet(1) but about web browser, correspondently. Some ADSL modems expose some of their data over SNMP. Maybe yours too? > snmpget -v 1 -c hohoe1234 192.168.1.254 IF-MIB::ifSpeed.501 > IF-MIB::ifSpeed.501 = Gauge32: 18337000 My modem syncs at around 18 mbps of raw downstream. Keep in mind that SNMP might be disabled by default and you'll have to enable it. HTH, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 28 08:43:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17611518 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 08:43:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c-s@c-s.li) Received: from mail.319.ch (319.ch [88.198.108.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D2E8FC08 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 08:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.319.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD2718CC0C for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:33:46 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=c-s.li; s=C-S; t=1356683627; bh=/PVQ/wHH8ZBH9samnlpNraC4OsR15Rc3hJEhuDvEMQk=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:From:To; b=oB0SYjCPvklVuF43M/hRcac3/xWaH2MsRL/rxBoT8+8i+YrbL1jTV1fnAtn5IeKt0 Mp/ILMdbaWJ4TIB0vrCjDH0JfaP4xbTgr8aFsjcmSQJDI7gEwxp9IfgEqkoCKY9AsK 2hmbLLriGw/DHJcd0/0kkFrcFTUGql0uP5scbTfU= Received: from mail.319.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (maia.319.ch [127.0.0.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 90962-03 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:33:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from webmail.319.ch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: c-s@c-s.li) by mail.319.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EF38318CC07 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:33:43 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=c-s.li; s=C-S; t=1356683624; bh=/PVQ/wHH8ZBH9samnlpNraC4OsR15Rc3hJEhuDvEMQk=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:From:To; b=IMu01WO/BU3Rl4hrpMLvh0+ff5NxsyXc/YTKkbmLcnBmKSj+5xcJxAr9rtvlH+XBy ST+rJgmv9/mvL5iT4CtNS49XO1yCxd1DqESJXZfsrpK8TN71l5CZHm3xoG6V9OeGUb VWzpx4LIIWr0Ih7vOJ8c4T7w6jzro4iIRKeoMG8U= Received: from 84.72.44.58 (SquirrelMail authenticated user c-s@c-s.li) by webmail.319.ch with HTTP; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:33:44 +0100 Message-ID: <9295e7e163201a1fa49bf67543c7304d.squirrel@webmail.319.ch> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:33:44 +0100 Subject: Re: Full disk encryption without root partition From: "C-S" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 08:43:03 -0000 > Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 22:18:40 +0100 > From: mhca12 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Full disk encryption without root partition > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:17 PM, mhca12 wrote: >> Are there any plans or is there already support for full >> disk encryption without the need for a root partition? > > I am sorry, I certainly meant to write "boot partition". > Yes, it is possible to use GELI for example to do a full disk encryption and have the boot partition on a USB stick. cs@ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 28 08:58:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66655669 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 08:58:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ADC78FC0A for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 08:58:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [46.244.147.69] (helo=localhost.my.domain) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ToVmA-0007ZO-TG; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:58:47 +0100 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qBS8wiT4005567; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:58:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id qBS8wgal005566; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:58:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:58:41 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: Tzanetos Balitsaris Subject: Re: working SIP phone for FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20121228085841.GA5557@tinyCurrent> References: <50D8854A.5050908@barafranca.com> <20121224193308.14856fti4vxsgs0k@webmail.it.teithe.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20121224193308.14856fti4vxsgs0k@webmail.it.teithe.gr> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT r214444 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 46.244.147.69 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Hugo Silva X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 08:58:57 -0000 El día Monday, December 24, 2012 a las 07:33:08PM +0200, Tzanetos Balitsaris escribió: > I suggest Jitsi [1]. It is an open source audio/video and chat > software written in Java that supports multiple protocols including > SIP. Specifically, the former name of it was SIP Communicator. > > It was listed as a wanted port in Wiki and in the beginning of > December I submitted it as a new port in GNATS. If you want to install > it on your system and test it, please download from the PR [2] the > jitsi.shar file and install it as usual (make install clean). > > > [1] https://jitsi.org/ > [2] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=174208 Hi Tzanetos, I've used your port and installed Jitsi on my laptop; thanks; do you know why the account window on my sreen (1024x600) looks so ugly: http://www.unixarea.de/jitsi.jpg it registers fine to my Yahoo account and I will try SIP later on. Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 28 09:44:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC71E32 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:44:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16718FC14 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:44:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [46.244.147.69] (helo=localhost.my.domain) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ToWU7-00031t-5Y; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 10:44:11 +0100 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qBS9i91D006416; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 10:44:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id qBS9i8LY006415; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 10:44:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 10:44:08 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: Tzanetos Balitsaris , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Hugo Silva Subject: Re: working SIP phone for FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20121228094408.GA6355@tinyCurrent> References: <50D8854A.5050908@barafranca.com> <20121224193308.14856fti4vxsgs0k@webmail.it.teithe.gr> <20121228085841.GA5557@tinyCurrent> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20121228085841.GA5557@tinyCurrent> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT r214444 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 46.244.147.69 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:44:13 -0000 El día Friday, December 28, 2012 a las 09:58:41AM +0100, Matthias Apitz escribió: > Hi Tzanetos, > > I've used your port and installed Jitsi on my laptop; thanks; do you > know why the account window on my sreen (1024x600) looks so ugly: > http://www.unixarea.de/jitsi.jpg > > it registers fine to my Yahoo account and I will try SIP later on. and I could not make jitsi using /dev/video0 of webcamd (which works fine in Skype and other apps); any idea? matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 28 11:29:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC524196 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:29:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ia0-f171.google.com (mail-ia0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A5D8FC14 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f171.google.com with SMTP id k27so8728800iad.2 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 03:29:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; bh=iVPmg/Y98FOIddMT7VncACYJs3VJuUonQel5k54XIlg=; b=nFyZ0ziyEhU8sCtphqLP2Xpj2KpMAWl7GFAav1OLvRnANTfBPzyG1xpftE/rk9rsBx 9XgxQqWMTG+6ZioqAuNRKrxY0EYcm2gMIaJLRS9FaiuOcGMc+yhqsCsZ5ekEyPnj7rlJ 1UD3PZxvNusj3+1qQTHy8lLxb5ibFfvVzrJ7Rlt5Pp9mt+l07M6tWJXHIvU+EAXdJPLQ gR/mipuBxRQaoZRydfZcQ2A1rXF/zELTUYlOhhGITurcHVkUeezgm30h7M9WMav0rwju DpmCV60bsdoSE7T1PFsyc4HUXmfIkdbkjSoSN7NVacBZ1nV0A71oabxrLw7u9HcZhP5J MQPg== X-Received: by 10.50.214.2 with SMTP id nw2mr24828690igc.110.1356694169387; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 03:29:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from luna.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com. [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id kp4sm26375718igc.1.2012.12.28.03.29.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 28 Dec 2012 03:29:28 -0800 (PST) From: ajtiM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Matthias Apitz Subject: Re: working SIP phone for FreeBSD? Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 05:29:18 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.8.4; i386; ; ) References: <50D8854A.5050908@barafranca.com> <20121228085841.GA5557@tinyCurrent> <20121228094408.GA6355@tinyCurrent> In-Reply-To: <20121228094408.GA6355@tinyCurrent> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201212280529.18520.lumiwa@gmail.com> Cc: Hugo Silva , Tzanetos Balitsaris X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:29:35 -0000 On Friday 28 December 2012 03:44:08 Matthias Apitz wrote: > El d=EDa Friday, December 28, 2012 a las 09:58:41AM +0100, Matthias Apitz= =20 escribi=F3: > > Hi Tzanetos, > >=20 > > I've used your port and installed Jitsi on my laptop; thanks; do you > > know why the account window on my sreen (1024x600) looks so ugly: > > http://www.unixarea.de/jitsi.jpg > >=20 > > it registers fine to my Yahoo account and I will try SIP later on. >=20 > and I could not make jitsi using /dev/video0 of webcamd (which works > fine in Skype and other apps); any idea? >=20 > matthias I installed jitsti too and registered to XMPP, ippi and iptel. With XMPP=20 (Jabber) and ippi I can connect but on iptel.org I am not succesful with=20 conection. I don't have a camera and I didn't try to talk with anyone becau= se=20 all frinds have Skype. I don't know how sound works because in settings I h= ave=20 just java sound option. I use jitsi on FreeBSD 9.1-Release and KDE 4.8.4. Mitja =2D------- http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 28 11:30:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B37233 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mhca12@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com (mail-ob0-f180.google.com [209.85.214.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F7A8FC0A for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:30:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id wd20so9365761obb.25 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 03:29:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=QAoH3iJxU7VMiy1MV1n6SeJrYSzGK3UfZWCe15c869k=; b=warCgTW4ORaucXugsuKbnUi629vBcNbz90+9Pjjr4N2EgfXbjWpR5DwK/DQrbC4xPa gG96A7YFpOg1YPoArHoT15pwcYTUtisZirximFOk71vltxAIJRXPuSxEm/ABRKlepXGA h3QHbxfQHXkK7Yc6gsgjJliCyYqIG72OLuzItaYLm+Df4xbgsy1xROpRGHiP3WDnKQ3m om6obHYbvbcXfP+yAN/jw2D4aTGRRtoy1wF6eXZvJ9M+Em+9N8qjkF4CEjEhqxe88CHv yvUWiBBq8xd8PnPJYqQK8rWiTnzVi3/X4+DRdbRw5YLTWQMPjiE70u3TJx60DCcHw+ho Dp6A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.172.71 with SMTP id ba7mr15606054oec.50.1356694199260; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 03:29:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.34.73 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 03:29:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9295e7e163201a1fa49bf67543c7304d.squirrel@webmail.319.ch> References: <9295e7e163201a1fa49bf67543c7304d.squirrel@webmail.319.ch> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 12:29:59 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Full disk encryption without root partition From: mhca12 To: C-S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:30:05 -0000 On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 9:33 AM, C-S wrote: > >> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 22:18:40 +0100 >> From: mhca12 >> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: Re: Full disk encryption without root partition >> Message-ID: >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:17 PM, mhca12 wrote: >>> Are there any plans or is there already support for full >>> disk encryption without the need for a root partition? >> >> I am sorry, I certainly meant to write "boot partition". >> > > > Yes, it is possible to use GELI for example to do a full disk encryption > and have the boot partition on a USB stick. That would still keep the boot partition as unencrypted, wouldn't it? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 28 15:35:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FC43D3; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:35:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF538FC08; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [46.244.147.69] (helo=localhost.my.domain) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tobxx-0008D8-Et; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:35:21 +0100 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qBSFZJjY036335; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:35:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id qBSFZHu4036334; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:35:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:35:17 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: Tzanetos Balitsaris , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Hugo Silva Subject: jitsi (was: Re: working SIP phone for FreeBSD?) Message-ID: <20121228153517.GA36192@tinyCurrent> References: <50D8854A.5050908@barafranca.com> <20121224193308.14856fti4vxsgs0k@webmail.it.teithe.gr> <20121228085841.GA5557@tinyCurrent> <20121228094408.GA6355@tinyCurrent> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20121228094408.GA6355@tinyCurrent> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT r214444 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 46.244.147.69 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, tzabal@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:35:24 -0000 El día Friday, December 28, 2012 a las 10:44:08AM +0100, Matthias Apitz escribió: > > I've used your port and installed Jitsi on my laptop; thanks; do you > > know why the account window on my sreen (1024x600) looks so ugly: > > http://www.unixarea.de/jitsi.jpg > > > > it registers fine to my Yahoo account and I will try SIP later on. > > and I could not make jitsi using /dev/video0 of webcamd (which works > fine in Skype and other apps); any idea? I have had a look into the Java sources: in jitsi/src/net/java/sip/communicator/impl/neomedia/device/JmfDeviceDetector.java initializeVideo() there is no support for FreeBSD (only for MAC OS, Linux and Windows); I added it the same way as Linux would do, hoping that our V4L2 is doing its job; but it turned out that the Java/C interface shared object in jitsi/src/native/linux/video4linux2 does not get built by the port and so it says in the log file: 12:57:00.189 INFO: impl.neomedia.device.JmfDeviceDetector.initializeVideo().307 No Video4Linux2 detected: no jvideo4linux2 in java.library.path matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 28 17:23:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B106F635 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 17:23:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF2F8FC0C for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 17:23:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.net (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBSHMgBT060245 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 18:22:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9799612341; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 18:22:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 18:22:42 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: correct way for installing python extensions for 3.3? Message-ID: <20121228172242.GB4522@slackbox.erewhon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f" Content-Disposition: inline X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 17:23:20 -0000 --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Currently I'm using python 2.7.3 because numpy required it. It seems that numpy some other extensions can now be installed for python3. Numpy for python 2.7.3 is already installed, and now I want to install it for python 3.3 as well. I'm just not sure how to do that? Reading /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.python.mk implies that setting PYTHON_VERSION in /etc/make.conf should only be done if you want to build extensions with an older binary. Is that still correct? In other words: what is the best way to install numpy and other extensions = for different major versions of python? Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlDd1WIACgkQEnfvsMMhpyXHwQCeMwkkFT77z7AratYCa+ouxQAz 7FsAn2RvI31Inj46sbjZO7DSK04jeqG+ =yeQ0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 28 19:18:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E4513E for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:18:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tzabal@it.teithe.gr) Received: from smtp.it.teithe.gr (smtp.it.teithe.gr [195.251.123.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD368FC08 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:18:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (www-data@[195.251.123.231]) by smtp.it.teithe.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id qBSJGUSU008545; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 21:16:31 +0200 Received: from ppp046177009210.access.hol.gr (ppp046177009210.access.hol.gr [46.177.9.210]) by webmail.it.teithe.gr (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 21:16:30 +0200 Message-ID: <20121228211630.63326y39gv2w5b7y@webmail.it.teithe.gr> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 21:16:30 +0200 From: Tzanetos Balitsaris To: Matthias Apitz Subject: Re: working SIP phone for FreeBSD? References: <50D8854A.5050908@barafranca.com> <20121224193308.14856fti4vxsgs0k@webmail.it.teithe.gr> <20121228085841.GA5557@tinyCurrent> In-Reply-To: <20121228085841.GA5557@tinyCurrent> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.7) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:18:58 -0000 Quoting Matthias Apitz : > El día Monday, December 24, 2012 a las 07:33:08PM +0200, Tzanetos > Balitsaris escribió: > > Hi Tzanetos, > > I've used your port and installed Jitsi on my laptop; thanks; do you > know why the account window on my sreen (1024x600) looks so ugly: > http://www.unixarea.de/jitsi.jpg > > it registers fine to my Yahoo account and I will try SIP later on. > > Thanks > > matthias > Hello Matthias, I do not know why the label and the textarea for Password does not show correctly. In my 17" monitor with 1280x1024 resolution it appears in the right position. But generally the user interface of Jitsi it may not be so appealing because it is written in Java Swing. We may need to install any port that render Java Swing applications more correctly. Regards Tzanetos -- Tzanetos Balitsaris ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 02:23:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FAEC3B3 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 02:23:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:6:6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49B58FC0A for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 02:23:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp247-71.static.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([203.122.247.71]) by ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 29 Dec 2012 12:53:53 +1030 Message-ID: <50DE5413.1060405@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 12:53:15 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121030 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland Smith Subject: Re: correct way for installing python extensions for 3.3? References: <20121228172242.GB4522@slackbox.erewhon.net> In-Reply-To: <20121228172242.GB4522@slackbox.erewhon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 02:23:55 -0000 On 29/12/2012 03:52, Roland Smith wrote: > Currently I'm using python 2.7.3 because numpy required it. It seems that > numpy some other extensions can now be installed for python3. > > Numpy for python 2.7.3 is already installed, and now I want to install it > for python 3.3 as well. I'm just not sure how to do that? Reading > /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.python.mk implies that setting PYTHON_VERSION in > /etc/make.conf should only be done if you want to build extensions with an > older binary. Is that still correct? > > In other words: what is the best way to install numpy and other extensions for > different major versions of python? > > Roland > I'll second that. As a temporary workaround I duplicated py-numpy to py-numpy32 and changed USE_PYTHON to 3.2. It appears that some extra patching is needed for 3.3 which I haven't gotten to yet. Is duplicate ports the only way to install multiple versions? This should be extended to boost-python-libs as well. I duplicated the port to boost-python3-libs and changed it to use py3.2. This enables the building of libboost_python as well as libboost_python3 so it looks to be able to support both py3.x and py2.7 if built against py3.x. I only use this for blender so I don't know for sure that py2.7 will work right. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 05:42:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3E02A3; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 05:42:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f51.google.com (mail-vb0-f51.google.com [209.85.212.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9764E8FC13; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 05:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id fq11so11153580vbb.24 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 21:42:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=HDUNRTTTSt2u2koyCu53hp8PAqf/l0bKT2VH/z8RwxQ=; b=yIdEA6c0E5j6z+rco2ld/zPQxJrxn7NjCm3cjYQVWDyijLhZcVNPheEYKloXD1D8f1 bQBQtQOY5HrWpSUfj/0QCrj6hr3sMjq9IOtIBUlPGCZydcJT6MEvgTsDxhUQ9fijG6tL O1AO9SbeXXeshm0xQUphnYCR5Mu5mgRkkZP7zV5VhGpjFXdaAOz7RBxobigmNVnUbTGl 51jUaLwlqiYwTz0GiVGtk7MDdhYYQ15UwLYs8DZYN+SYMTK70Q0SbQninyMylMi2b1kN jt7IPScoIp7a6/ZkHLlxzCIWHHDs3gSwPyrqSLrj3l/7ORiOXokaD6b6LvJR/hVIOzua bHDQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.35.37 with SMTP id e5mr46769939vdj.115.1356759722484; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 21:42:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.148.147 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 21:42:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.148.147 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 21:42:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121226082755.ee1d4a3077742aa0ff1638e2@gmx.net> References: <201212241227.15165.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> <20121226082755.ee1d4a3077742aa0ff1638e2@gmx.net> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 07:42:02 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.20 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) From: David Naylor To: Jens Jahnke Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 05:42:04 -0000 On 26 Dec 2012 9:28 AM, "Jens Jahnke" wrote: > > Hi, Hi, > On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 12:27:11 +0200 > David Naylor wrote: > > DN> Since it is possible to install the existing pkg > DN> packages in a pkgng environment (which I do) this is not a high > DN> priority. > > is there a documentation for that? I searched the pkgng docs but found > nothing regarding installation of "old" packages or converting them to > a newer version. Use the old `pkg_ng` command to install the package. As long as the files installed with the old and the new package tools are mutually exclusive you shouldn't have a problem. If you patch your ports tree with the wine-fbsd64 diff then it is possible to use `pkg2ng` to convert to the pkgng format. (Although I have never tested that, see documentation for pkg2ng and `pkg create`). Regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 07:43:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C473A20 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 07:43:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jan0sch@gmx.net) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD42C8FC0C for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 07:43:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.4]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M1Tap-1Sw3XB2UQL-00tRVQ for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 08:43:40 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Dec 2012 07:43:40 -0000 Received: from dslb-088-072-234-048.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO magni.rostock.home) [88.72.234.48] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 29 Dec 2012 08:43:40 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1545395 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/LDRM1+wHLCZZTjMQd0kM0CU08SMLK5XNhD+g0RE TC5F8eNN4HOM71 Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 08:43:20 +0100 From: Jens Jahnke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.5.20 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) Message-Id: <20121229084320.b82c4f049bf1f250f55f04eb@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: References: <201212241227.15165.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> <20121226082755.ee1d4a3077742aa0ff1638e2@gmx.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) X-Face: &?!P`87-36gaG)/K:yi&ixw=uy]y'?$vrc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA512"; boundary="Signature=_Sat__29_Dec_2012_08_43_20_+0100_VxY19n1fYLEsZM.J" X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 07:43:42 -0000 --Signature=_Sat__29_Dec_2012_08_43_20_+0100_VxY19n1fYLEsZM.J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 07:42:02 +0200 David Naylor wrote: DN> > On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 12:27:11 +0200 DN> > David Naylor wrote: DN> > DN> > DN> Since it is possible to install the existing pkg DN> > DN> packages in a pkgng environment (which I do) this is not a DN> > DN> high priority. DN> > DN> > is there a documentation for that? I searched the pkgng docs but DN> > found nothing regarding installation of "old" packages or DN> > converting them to a newer version. DN>=20 DN> Use the old `pkg_ng` command to install the package. As long as the DN> files installed with the old and the new package tools are mutually DN> exclusive you shouldn't have a problem. DN>=20 DN> If you patch your ports tree with the wine-fbsd64 diff then it is DN> possible to use `pkg2ng` to convert to the pkgng format. (Although DN> I have never tested that, see documentation for pkg2ng and `pkg DN> create`). meanwhile I've succeeded in building wine from ports using a 32bit system under /compat/i386 following the instructions in the freebsd wiki. I needed some tweaks which I documented here:=20 https://makandracards.com/jan0sch/13429-installing-wine-under-freebsd-8-amd= 64 Regards, Jens --=20 29. Julmond 2012, 08:38 Homepage : http://www.jan0sch.de Still looking for the glorious results of my misspent youth. Say, do you have a map to the next joint? --Signature=_Sat__29_Dec_2012_08_43_20_+0100_VxY19n1fYLEsZM.J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQG8BAEBCgAGBQJQ3p8qAAoJED2+SXzzbciG3KINALDEl+K1uqVpNxGkXtPyZrZB Q9rfvTMa4bXns7f91SAvbByWfrivYxGF4F3wu+UlY3u0i29JZnw4DfHQ2v6kFchz GPJJqlIF8vZKZnAcWIa5SkI1qUmlqekxcbGrRxquyWMlj9lmYj3265+hamN+BubY hDdHFPCjd2liLoXvbDNtqjakK3R5bIugjA9QqfHoXe2NUaccniuyexKkc3lRYX0c dRZvwp32dRw7mrjTYwFtv+vZj8t/cc1BqY7kb++KfzO/gdZHVDsXgCDk83JoJvQ3 1ndCf0X1idqaiFi5XXWXi3UGlEGu16FMf+otM+R6R3pL84jmeCDgGw3McthBXVfR Q3DiVoS8OTAZG8dNFPCSdGXbWfK5wnlp8kboUbnorBHO4Adf2bZ0UgAvBNBVM4s9 NHybDeRKmw6Vs9N3F4mG1xWT8jFD5Wj214dchdO7bB4SdE5bxkX4dIVFgzr9zTkz Th/Loj36rrIeczYDqxGbySZx4hi/3V9u514rc3BpERmQ2iVtE/xCZ/bZ6Qrpn9CR kl0NsfU3S+3cgk6vrAjs =T7YJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sat__29_Dec_2012_08_43_20_+0100_VxY19n1fYLEsZM.J-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 10:20:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F83A31 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 10:20:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam.gh1986@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0388FC0A for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 10:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id fy27so11497841vcb.41 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 02:19:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=901Vgs5wJcGOxjPIV4l8Bgpr1YkkZUkJMcQ0FAFVIFs=; b=DmQL05mnbO/guBRjb7RrjB/mIXEWCj5dofgO6j+XI9CTp7HRPlPTqQb+qLeIkPEd4P E14j7dDwH32HNUrfHyUSbmxz85fvUlGRhRWauN2v6dka+Qpo8u5uulA4xZf7CzqzAZIG ohQV4KVSmkHxGU5hDVGVOJvCUqHqo0KXUP/tSRR68l7LpQhBA3YITM8qpGoBiYDfkGE/ 457QjqLOPVe67Kg1cepd1JB/OiqECvpdrJmc/9GLqHUAOI2eohYzMmA82TR62kRoEtHx VQ98YFlW6elFhQju2G1ZfTd/yfcecEit03/nDV3m5sb9Hlo4dMV1Z6AhhWFyViLKvhIY CQ+A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.156.72 with SMTP id wc8mr48204174vdb.77.1356776397561; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 02:19:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.245.104 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 02:19:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 13:49:57 +0330 Message-ID: Subject: expect doesn't work correctly with cu From: s m To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 10:20:04 -0000 hello every body i want to run cu via expect shell script. when i run my script, cu is running and enter its cli. but when i enter a command (like ~s to set variable) manually , this command doesn't execute and cu cli is closed and bash return an error that this command is not valid. this is my shell script: #!/usr/local/bin/expect set timeout 20 spawn cu -l /dev/ttyu0 -s 115200 -e expect "Connected" send "~s" expect "~[]" send "hardwareflow\n" expect eof and this is the output: [root@zharf ~]# /usr/SAM/shell-scripts/runcu.sh spawn cu -l /dev/ttyu0 -s 115200 -e Connected ~[set] *all / *i enter this command manually [root@zharf ~]# all bash: all: command not found [root@zharf ~]# i don't know what happened when i run cu via expect that doesn't work correctly. please let me know if you have any ideas. yours, SAM From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 11:19:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9419712D for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 11:19:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j.chhayani@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc4-s19.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc4-s19.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.190.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773E38FC12 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 11:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BAY002-W175 ([65.54.190.199]) by bay0-omc4-s19.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 29 Dec 2012 03:19:03 -0800 X-EIP: [bbXk0TzlUkWtWhqH1pWq6YViwLFvxqUF] X-Originating-Email: [j.chhayani@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: J chhayani To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: HI Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 16:49:03 +0530 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Dec 2012 11:19:03.0668 (UTC) FILETIME=[4F0D1B40:01CDE5B6] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 11:19:09 -0000 Hi=2C=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= I was just reviewing your website=0A= and found it very interesting. I really like your website and services you = are=0A= providing. I was wondering if we can work with you and help you with your= =0A= business.=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= I would like to offer you our Hire Developer/Programmer=0A= service where you can hire our dedicated developer who will dedicatedly wor= k=0A= for you. We are having three different plans for the same like Full-Time=2C= =0A= Part-Time and Hourly. Currently=2C many of our clients are getting benefits= from=0A= this service. Let me share some of the benefits of our Hire Developer Servi= ce:=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Guaranteed to=0A= save you at least 75% of cost against having on site team / resources.= =0A= Compare it=0A= with fixed priced quote=2C it saves your minimum 35% of cost.=0A= No start up or=0A= maintenance cost compare to invest in onsite team.=0A= Project=0A= control is totally on your hand (*no hidden conditions) as you can=0A= co-ordinate with developer directly.=0A= It=92s save your=0A= time to find new developer for your projects. =0A= Multiple=0A= options / hiring models to choose to hire developer.=0A= You can have=0A= every 10 minutes snapshots of your dedicated web developer=92s machine= =0A= during work.=0A= High-speed=0A= communications and live chat conferencing capabilities.=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= I can share references of our=0A= existing clients who are currently getting benefits from our Hire Developer= =0A= service. You can know more about this service from below link.=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Build Your Virtual Team:=0A= =0A= http://www.narolainfotech.com/hire-web-developers.html=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= We=2C Narola are a leading Custom Software Development company based in Ind= ia. We are having a good=0A= experience in Custom Web Design and Development=2C Custom Mobile Applicatio= n=0A= Development=2C E-Commerce Solution=2C Real Estate Portal Development=2C etc= .=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Narola Strengths:=0A= =0A= - =0A= 6 years of successful operations=0A= =0A= - =0A= 54 team members=0A= =0A= - =0A= Technology/Process maturity=0A= =0A= - =0A= 500+ satisfied clients=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Our Skilled Team:=0A= =0A= - =0A= 43 Experienced=0A= Programmers/Developers=0A= =0A= - =0A= 5 Business Analyst=0A= =0A= - =0A= 2 Project Manager=0A= =0A= - =0A= 4 Graphic Designers=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Our Technology Expertise:=0A= =0A= PHP=2C ASP .NET (2.0=2C 3.5)=2C iOS SDK=0A= (iPhone/iPad)=2C Android SDK and expert in their related CMS and frameworks= .=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Web Service/API Integration Expertise:=0A= =0A= Twitter=2C Facebook=2C Google Checkout=2C=0A= PayPal=2C Skype. And many more=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Other Technologies Expertise:=0A= =0A= jQuery=2C SOA=2C Web Services=2C XML=2C=0A= AJAX=2C and many more.=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= You can check our website to know=0A= more about us and our services.=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= http://www.narolainfotech.com/=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= See Narola Team at work: http://www.narolainfotech.com/video-narola-infotec= h.html =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Let me know your views and we can=0A= discuss further on this. I would be happy to share our past work details wi= th=0A= you.=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= I look forward to your positive=0A= reply!!!=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Regards=2C=0A= =0A= j.chhayani =0A= =0A= Note: - Though this is not an automated email=2C we keep on=0A= sending out these emails to all those people whom we find eligible of using= our=0A= services. To unsubscribe from future mails (i.e.=2C to ensure that we do no= t=0A= contact you again for this matter)=2C please reply NO. = From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 14:18:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7298D5 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:18:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saeedeh.motlagh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com (mail-la0-f47.google.com [209.85.215.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69ED98FC0C for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:18:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id fh20so2082826lab.6 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 06:18:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=/jSyfHOU9aHB76jjlKg2bABTsZAvVoSC+caTfs39TN4=; b=0Ok7zpGlUZI8Zv/RUSSwBKvtPnhTDUk6ywIJbE7LpcGSUwuHxxLcNG8mjOn9ctg/nA d4dPolml5JtK3/1dU5c891YwlVoZHAJVG9wpfAWnKKQOuCN9FV08aOiXBnWMhjgsVnOH uSrjYNexRFkgjvVUP3wujVzlDGR4vGq53bjFZY+GaFaHgfWhLjII5iB+qxekwiadi9DD 63fGCSTdSkINMyRHeRy8PHUtnSBz0YNQR/Kvd/P8M63ElauvaZ3oxGsa2NDVyv1D7OWq 6NjL1AfPVq0+X8P4i1MnuVOApZLHU+Jx02J/BSyuoZk0/LERovPtzIcIQTTtvMpFSM9t sAsQ== Received: by 10.112.103.135 with SMTP id fw7mr14592776lbb.17.1356790683112; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 06:18:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.87.132 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 06:17:22 -0800 (PST) From: saeedeh motlagh Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 17:47:22 +0330 Message-ID: Subject: plink can not work with serial port To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:18:05 -0000 hello guys i have a problem with putty and plink. i want to connect to a modem via serial port by putty. when i run the below command, every thing is ok and modem responds me. putty -v -serial -sercfg 8,1,115200,n,R /dev/ttyu2 but when i run the below command modem doesn't respond to me. plink -v -serial -sercfg 8,1,115200,n,R /dev/ttyu2 i check it by another com port instead of modem. i mean i connect two freebsd boxes by com port and run above command but nothing happened either. i have to work with plink beacuse i have no graphic and when i installed putty without GTK, just plink is installed and there is no putty command. please let me know what i'm doing wrong. any comments or hints are really appreciated. thanks *Sa.M* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 16:23:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181F7EF5 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 16:23:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-da0-f48.google.com (mail-da0-f48.google.com [209.85.210.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D628FC0A for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 16:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-da0-f48.google.com with SMTP id k18so5253528dae.7 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 08:23:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=aGtzXNB6FLRWYXKceTHDqmdjwUENz7Ek1Yc1U0ZW2nw=; b=LzJSlK+wa7SxH1V7g86oNoC7TGjoule+1v8pYJ2T/krR0W+aAe4Rvi5EhwBkh4T7xM XmjRsf1A1RBBp85h0jg9c1sG3prQWrngqOMfbjxYEgXoc2t2EfbgLaBGoonu1E1PZJkc YkqlbrozfFT2asHSMnd+o2CE8poQzRFl343fHY7JJmaJ5r9D6WuExeyAjMBe1m5/qKpO 3Y5KVCIsKwdukKVFPkqFX7h7iRnQC+8JapJ3e1uMTEQsZmypsblh1AkKSxD8TEl77J8J WS9HOwONVTOp6YxFqZn3W6y1+33B+AZ07S+5os2nvtSLqMDOft63nTprybj+zzYCrY3v ZpgQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.219.67 with SMTP id pm3mr115021748pbc.150.1356798195063; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 08:23:15 -0800 (PST) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.66.254.164 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 08:23:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 11:23:14 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: _pwHNBy7C6pSNh0d6NxW7vwkeBE Message-ID: Subject: Re: HI From: Alejandro Imass To: J chhayani Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkio1d64S+7+2oOPEUSLYtVkJ5f3ykK2yGa0B/lM/UcH7anGZ4lg6Lz7mvL2ZYS3TKdfqLf Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 16:23:16 -0000 NO NO NO On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 6:19 AM, J chhayani wrote: > Hi, > > > > I was just reviewing your website > and found it very interesting. I really like your website and services you are > providing. I was wondering if we can work with you and help you with your > business. > [...] > > Note: - Though this is not an automated email, we keep on > sending out these emails to all those people whom we find eligible of using our > services. To unsubscribe from future mails (i.e., to ensure that we do not > contact you again for this matter), please reply NO. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 17:13:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DB8D16 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 17:13:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8BE8FC0A for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 17:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 29 Dec 2012 09:13:33 -0800 Message-ID: <50DF24BC.20507@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 12:13:32 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: static ip address and ifconfig Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Dec 2012 17:13:33.0793 (UTC) FILETIME=[D5089D10:01CDE5E7] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 17:13:33 -0000 I don't have static ip address so I can not find out for myself. Lets say I am a company that my ISP has assigned us 25 static ip address. When I issue the ifconfig command what will it show me? Just the single primary static ip address or all 25 of them in a list? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 17:45:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 206EC423 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 17:45:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.jeays@rogers.com) Received: from nm27-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm27-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.94.236.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97F78FC0A for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 17:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [66.94.237.195] by nm27.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Dec 2012 17:42:08 -0000 Received: from [98.139.221.66] by tm6.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Dec 2012 17:42:08 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp103.rog.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Dec 2012 17:42:08 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rogers.com; s=s1024; t=1356802928; bh=3iBz5dgLI5KzH0/h7QdTPCVanEKov5e/WV0uHdzZQig=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Rkx9PuF5FO/ndLKW6tey7gA2Sh86ETyQhZgvKdPz8dZQ33qbgvYUbj2mSYYtShjIjEwCij6v01ZlipQrt9RK3uTM07D2kPe+UtKLYe3YHpT/k8GgqR82lEq0gQd869Psc0nf0rwTwlzWV5jMuqok7QnN1BSK31itexEJ5KL/f+g= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 144397.59223.bm@smtp103.rog.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: tmAtfskVM1kyo555TKptCt4a2Q8PdZHIvHsVn0nxd_8thCr Bcsljfigjo7NFPnfkX8qCUGoNeV1hiEaLldtmUOF_CbVxuvWVyE3KEfD0Rlo HioFqB.M9TpUIADukHk5vBkw585c0_lYOhbaRZyy_3e05jAdiRqf67IKCKwC vncEbhi.J0fGnoHcYTXduarLzuNPvvDY2mua2rk1uQHOuHziJKDtJ1SNoQ6i J_BDGKkXfcgKxJQTH0_a0Go1eSQhAiQT75K9UdsLSkXLsbbk.dtDWFI.OZrw rnmHTXASzNuQPTMsAijGr6FW1tUQCd.a2GcibfsVp.C3XoH6lJwfhf5G4C8P F4SoRlsETAp7f7oLTjK.i3eqAOm2gEgcCRhhJsJO7mNmwHBf8dR1gYHM4biM QQTxqiKijVcvV7Iw6dXeOEwjLLe_ISk9.5G.kJ7kxUTlhEnURuyqDn8qi4qE SG2l3MWam1_POcy0pP8LnOkELgnaDUQ-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: N82WFx6swBBjwcHWPFR2CGt6udzA8RPrA.xm0enFFXaK2g-- Received: from europa (mike.jeays@174.114.6.223 with login) by smtp103.rog.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Dec 2012 09:42:08 -0800 PST Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 12:42:07 -0500 From: Mike Jeays To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: static ip address and ifconfig Message-ID: <20121229124207.110dca60@europa> In-Reply-To: <50DF24BC.20507@a1poweruser.com> References: <50DF24BC.20507@a1poweruser.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.24.4; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 17:45:02 -0000 On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 12:13:32 -0500 Fbsd8 wrote: > I don't have static ip address so I can not find out for myself. > Lets say I am a company that my ISP has assigned us > 25 static ip address. > > When I issue the ifconfig command what will it show me? > > Just the single primary static ip address or all 25 of them in a list? > > Thanks > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" It will just show the one currently assigned. Try it - just bring up an xterm and type 'ifconfig' You don't have to be root, and you can't do any harm. em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=9b ether 08:00:27:40:ca:a9 inet 10.0.2.15 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.2.255 # HERE IT IS media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) status: active lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=3 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 nd6 options=3 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 18:05:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3559593B for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:05:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1659F8FC12 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 29 Dec 2012 10:05:32 -0800 Message-ID: <50DF30EA.1030408@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 13:05:30 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Jeays Subject: Re: static ip address and ifconfig References: <50DF24BC.20507@a1poweruser.com> <20121229124207.110dca60@europa> In-Reply-To: <20121229124207.110dca60@europa> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Dec 2012 18:05:32.0556 (UTC) FILETIME=[17F614C0:01CDE5EF] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:05:31 -0000 Mike Jeays wrote: > On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 12:13:32 -0500 > Fbsd8 wrote: > >> I don't have static ip address so I can not find out for myself. >> Lets say I am a company that my ISP has assigned us >> 25 static ip address. >> >> When I issue the ifconfig command what will it show me? >> >> Just the single primary static ip address or all 25 of them in a list? >> >> Thanks >> _______________________________________________ > > It will just show the one currently assigned. > > Try it - just bring up an xterm and type 'ifconfig' You don't have to > be root, and you can't do any harm. > > > em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=9b > ether 08:00:27:40:ca:a9 > inet 10.0.2.15 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.2.255 # HERE IT IS > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) > status: active > Nope 10.0.2.15 is a private lan IP address, its not public routable. question has to be answered by some body who has multiple static public routable ip address assigned by their ISP. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 18:24:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62A9BF8 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:24:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81AE98FC0A for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FC73CADA; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:16:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id qBTIG4Z7001885; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:16:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:16:04 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: static ip address and ifconfig Message-Id: <20121229191604.cff1a883.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <50DF30EA.1030408@a1poweruser.com> References: <50DF24BC.20507@a1poweruser.com> <20121229124207.110dca60@europa> <50DF30EA.1030408@a1poweruser.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mike Jeays , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:24:40 -0000 On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 13:05:30 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > Mike Jeays wrote: > > On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 12:13:32 -0500 > > Fbsd8 wrote: > > > >> I don't have static ip address so I can not find out for myself. > >> Lets say I am a company that my ISP has assigned us > >> 25 static ip address. > >> > >> When I issue the ifconfig command what will it show me? > >> > >> Just the single primary static ip address or all 25 of them in a list? > >> > >> Thanks > >> _______________________________________________ > > > > It will just show the one currently assigned. > > > > Try it - just bring up an xterm and type 'ifconfig' You don't have to > > be root, and you can't do any harm. > > > > > > em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > > options=9b > > ether 08:00:27:40:ca:a9 > > inet 10.0.2.15 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.2.255 # HERE IT IS > > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) > > status: active > > > > Nope 10.0.2.15 is a private lan IP address, its not public routable. > question has to be answered by some body who has multiple static public > routable ip address assigned by their ISP. The presented example simply shows a typical ifconfig output. On the "inet" line, you can see the assigned IP addresses. As per definition, one interface can be assigned more than one IP address, and maybe those will show in the ifconfig output - however, this depends on your actual setup, for example when you have specific network gear that "translates" one or more static IP addresses into local addresses that are _then_ assigned to individual network interfaces. However, at my old location I had assigned one static IP address directly delivered to the NIC, and ifconfig did show exactly that address. Simply try "ifconfig" and show what it prints for YOU. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 18:45:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BA732A for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:45:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669088FC0C for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:45:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 29 Dec 2012 10:45:55 -0800 Message-ID: <50DF3A61.6040307@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 13:45:53 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon Subject: Re: static ip address and ifconfig References: <50DF24BC.20507@a1poweruser.com> <20121229124207.110dca60@europa> <50DF30EA.1030408@a1poweruser.com> <20121229191604.cff1a883.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20121229191604.cff1a883.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Dec 2012 18:45:55.0463 (UTC) FILETIME=[BC205970:01CDE5F4] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:45:54 -0000 Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 13:05:30 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: >> Mike Jeays wrote: >>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 12:13:32 -0500 >>> Fbsd8 wrote: >>> >>>> I don't have static ip address so I can not find out for myself. >>>> Lets say I am a company that my ISP has assigned us >>>> 25 static ip address. >>>> >>>> When I issue the ifconfig command what will it show me? >>>> >>>> Just the single primary static ip address or all 25 of them in a list? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> It will just show the one currently assigned. >>> >>> Try it - just bring up an xterm and type 'ifconfig' You don't have to >>> be root, and you can't do any harm. >>> >>> >>> em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 >>> options=9b >>> ether 08:00:27:40:ca:a9 >>> inet 10.0.2.15 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.2.255 # HERE IT IS >>> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) >>> status: active >>> >> Nope 10.0.2.15 is a private lan IP address, its not public routable. >> question has to be answered by some body who has multiple static public >> routable ip address assigned by their ISP. > > The presented example simply shows a typical ifconfig output. > On the "inet" line, you can see the assigned IP addresses. > As per definition, one interface can be assigned more than > one IP address, and maybe those will show in the ifconfig > output - however, this depends on your actual setup, for > example when you have specific network gear that "translates" > one or more static IP addresses into local addresses that > are _then_ assigned to individual network interfaces. > > However, at my old location I had assigned one static IP > address directly delivered to the NIC, and ifconfig did > show exactly that address. > > Simply try "ifconfig" and show what it prints for YOU. > Yes I understand all that, but lets go deeper into difference between static and dynamic ip address assigned by the ISP. For anyone being a professional company who wants permanent presents on the internet will pay extra fees for static ip address because static ip address never change and this is required for domain name registration. Dynamic ip address are normally assigned by the ISP for home users having dsl or tv cable internet connections. Dynamic ip address can change and if used for domain name registration the users FQDN will no longer point to the correct host. Now to return to the original question. Say I am a professional company and my ISP assigned me 25 static ip address. What will ifconfig show me on the interface facing the public internet? Just the single primary static ip address or all 25 of them in a list? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 18:52:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8D5489 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:52:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74AD8FC0C for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:52:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00243CAB6; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:52:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id qBTIqgZd001984; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:52:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:52:42 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: static ip address and ifconfig Message-Id: <20121229195242.8a4f3210.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <50DF3A61.6040307@a1poweruser.com> References: <50DF24BC.20507@a1poweruser.com> <20121229124207.110dca60@europa> <50DF30EA.1030408@a1poweruser.com> <20121229191604.cff1a883.freebsd@edvax.de> <50DF3A61.6040307@a1poweruser.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:52:41 -0000 On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 13:45:53 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > For anyone being a professional company who wants permanent presents on > the internet will pay extra fees for static ip > address because static ip address never change and this is required for > domain name registration. Dynamic ip address are normally assigned by the > ISP for home users having dsl or tv cable internet connections. Dynamic > ip address can change and if used for domain name registration the users > FQDN will no longer point to the correct host. Correct. > Now to return to the original question. > Say I am a professional company and my ISP assigned me 25 static ip address. > What will ifconfig show me on the interface facing the public internet? > Just the single primary static ip address or all 25 of them in a list? If all 25 IP addresses are configured to be provided "through" the one network connection (either directly by ethernet port or through some kind of DSL modem), the interface would show all 25 addresses, like this: xl0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=80008 ether 01:23:45:67:89:ff inet 123.456.789.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 123.456.789.255 inet 123.456.789.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 123.456.789.255 inet 123.456.789.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 123.456.789.255 inet 123.456.789.4 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 123.456.789.255 inet 123.456.789.5 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 123.456.789.255 inet 123.456.789.6 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 123.456.789.255 inet 123.456.789.7 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 123.456.789.255 [...] inet 123.456.789.21 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 123.456.789.255 inet 123.456.789.22 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 123.456.789.255 inet 123.456.789.23 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 123.456.789.255 inet 123.456.789.24 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 123.456.789.255 inet 123.456.789.25 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 123.456.789.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active However, I've not seen that in reality. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 19:17:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF4CACE for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:17:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3198FC08 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 29 Dec 2012 11:17:29 -0800 Message-ID: <50DF41C8.5010503@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:17:28 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mikel King Subject: Re: static ip address and ifconfig References: <50DF24BC.20507@a1poweruser.com> <20121229124207.110dca60@europa> <50DF30EA.1030408@a1poweruser.com> <20121229191604.cff1a883.freebsd@edvax.de> <0DC2CDCE-7A58-4F5D-AD27-6A4B46DD05ED@olivent.com> In-Reply-To: <0DC2CDCE-7A58-4F5D-AD27-6A4B46DD05ED@olivent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Dec 2012 19:17:29.0954 (UTC) FILETIME=[2554BC20:01CDE5F9] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:17:28 -0000 >>Mikel King wrote: >> It will show you each IP address you have successfully bound >> to the interface. Using static IP addresses; the choice is yours >> on which get bound to the interface and which do not where as >> with DHCP the one chosen by the provider is assigned. >> >> If you bind only one then that is what it will show you. >> >Polytropon wrote: >If all 25 IP addresses are configured to be provided "through" >the one network connection (either directly by ethernet port >or through some kind of DSL modem), the interface would show >all 25 addresses, like this: > >xl0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu >1500 > options=80008 > ether 01:23:45:67:89:ff > inet 123.456.789.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 123.456.789.255 > inet 123.456.789.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 123.456.789.255 > inet 123.456.789.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 123.456.789.255 > inet 123.456.789.4 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 123.456.789.255 > inet 123.456.789.5 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 123.456.789.255 > inet 123.456.789.6 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 123.456.789.255 > snip same line for rest of 25 ip's > > However, I've not seen that in reality. :-) OK now were getting closer to real understanding of what is happening. Your both imply that there is some way to control which static ip address the ISP will forward to my NIC facing the public internet. This is the meat of the my question. How is this done? My host just has ifconfig_xl0="DHCP" in rc.conf and xl0 is the NIC connected to public internet connection coming from my ISP. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 19:21:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71A2BD5 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikel.king@olivent.com) Received: from mail.olivent.com (mail.olivent.com [75.99.82.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC008FC13 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:21:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.olivent.com (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits)); Sat, 29 Dec 2012 13:50:23 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: static ip address and ifconfig From: Mikel King In-Reply-To: <20121229191604.cff1a883.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 13:50:40 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0DC2CDCE-7A58-4F5D-AD27-6A4B46DD05ED@olivent.com> References: <50DF24BC.20507@a1poweruser.com> <20121229124207.110dca60@europa> <50DF30EA.1030408@a1poweruser.com> <20121229191604.cff1a883.freebsd@edvax.de> To: Polytropon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Cc: Mike Jeays , Fbsd8 , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:21:02 -0000 It will show you each IP address you have successfully bound to the = interface. Using static IP addresses; the choice is yours on which get = bound to the interface and which do not where as with DHCP the one = chosen by the provider is assigned. If you bind only one then that is what it will show you.=20 Regards, Mikel King Senior Editor, BSD News http://bsdnews.net =20 On Dec 29, 2012, at 1:16 PM, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 13:05:30 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: >> Mike Jeays wrote: >>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 12:13:32 -0500 >>> Fbsd8 wrote: >>>=20 >>>> I don't have static ip address so I can not find out for myself. >>>> Lets say I am a company that my ISP has assigned us >>>> 25 static ip address. >>>>=20 >>>> When I issue the ifconfig command what will it show me? >>>>=20 >>>> Just the single primary static ip address or all 25 of them in a = list? >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>=20 >>> It will just show the one currently assigned. >>>=20 >>> Try it - just bring up an xterm and type 'ifconfig' You don't have = to=20 >>> be root, and you can't do any harm. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> em0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 = mtu 1500 >>> options=3D9b >>> ether 08:00:27:40:ca:a9 >>> inet 10.0.2.15 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.2.255 # HERE = IT IS >>> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) >>> status: active >>>=20 >>=20 >> Nope 10.0.2.15 is a private lan IP address, its not public routable. >> question has to be answered by some body who has multiple static = public=20 >> routable ip address assigned by their ISP. >=20 > The presented example simply shows a typical ifconfig output. > On the "inet" line, you can see the assigned IP addresses. > As per definition, one interface can be assigned more than > one IP address, and maybe those will show in the ifconfig > output - however, this depends on your actual setup, for > example when you have specific network gear that "translates" > one or more static IP addresses into local addresses that > are _then_ assigned to individual network interfaces. >=20 > However, at my old location I had assigned one static IP > address directly delivered to the NIC, and ifconfig did > show exactly that address. >=20 > Simply try "ifconfig" and show what it prints for YOU. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 19:33:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9322CF5 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:33:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91BB48FC12 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:33:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail.dweimer.local [192.168.5.1]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBTJ9nE2058149 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 13:09:49 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 13:09:49 -0600 From: dweimer To: Subject: Re: static ip address and ifconfig Organization: dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <50DF3A61.6040307@a1poweruser.com> References: "\"<50DF24BC.20507@a1poweruser.com>" <20121229124207.110dca60@europa>" <50DF30EA.1030408@a1poweruser.com> <20121229191604.cff1a883.freebsd@edvax.de> <50DF3A61.6040307@a1poweruser.com> Message-ID: <29b73b32ef10a5f868eb1e3bbc6a0a95@dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:33:38 -0000 On 2012-12-29 12:45, Fbsd8 wrote: > Polytropon wrote: >> On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 13:05:30 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: >>> Mike Jeays wrote: >>>> On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 12:13:32 -0500 >>>> Fbsd8 wrote: >>>> >>>>> I don't have static ip address so I can not find out for myself. >>>>> Lets say I am a company that my ISP has assigned us >>>>> 25 static ip address. >>>>> >>>>> When I issue the ifconfig command what will it show me? >>>>> >>>>> Just the single primary static ip address or all 25 of them in a >>>>> list? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> It will just show the one currently assigned. >>>> >>>> Try it - just bring up an xterm and type 'ifconfig' You don't have >>>> to be root, and you can't do any harm. >>>> >>>> >>>> em0: flags=8843 metric 0 >>>> mtu 1500 >>>> options=9b >>>> ether 08:00:27:40:ca:a9 >>>> inet 10.0.2.15 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.2.255 # HERE IT >>>> IS >>>> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) >>>> status: active >>>> >>> Nope 10.0.2.15 is a private lan IP address, its not public >>> routable. >>> question has to be answered by some body who has multiple static >>> public routable ip address assigned by their ISP. >> The presented example simply shows a typical ifconfig output. >> On the "inet" line, you can see the assigned IP addresses. >> As per definition, one interface can be assigned more than >> one IP address, and maybe those will show in the ifconfig >> output - however, this depends on your actual setup, for >> example when you have specific network gear that "translates" >> one or more static IP addresses into local addresses that >> are _then_ assigned to individual network interfaces. >> However, at my old location I had assigned one static IP >> address directly delivered to the NIC, and ifconfig did >> show exactly that address. >> Simply try "ifconfig" and show what it prints for YOU. >> > > Yes I understand all that, but lets go deeper into difference between > static and dynamic ip address assigned by the ISP. > > For anyone being a professional company who wants permanent presents > on the internet will pay extra fees for static ip > address because static ip address never change and this is required > for > domain name registration. Dynamic ip address are normally assigned by > the > ISP for home users having dsl or tv cable internet connections. > Dynamic > ip address can change and if used for domain name registration the > users > FQDN will no longer point to the correct host. > > Now to return to the original question. > Say I am a professional company and my ISP assigned me 25 static ip > address. > What will ifconfig show me on the interface facing the public > internet? > Just the single primary static ip address or all 25 of them in a > list? > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" It still all depends on your configuration, it won't look any different than a static private IP address shows when doing an ifconfig except it will be the public IP. Generally if you have a static IP you will have to set it manually, and it won't get it via DHCP. But I have worked with some DSL connections though that assigned the static IP through a DHCP reservation based on your modem/routers MAC address. However that would only work for a single IP. If you get 25, you can assign those with aliases to make a single server answer on the others as well, common for servers hosting multiple https web sites. Here's an example with Aliases, its from a LAN with private range, but would look no different except IPs if it was public range addresses. This is from my web/email server (the very one this message comes from), the secondary IP is for running jails, when testing upgrades. LAN: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 9000 options=209b ether 00:07:e9:09:be:4f inet 192.168.5.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.5.255 inet 192.168.5.21 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.5.255 nd6 options=29 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) status: active Here's an example from a public range, pulled this from my pfSense box, which is on a Cable Connection with a block of 5 static IP Addresses. vr1: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8280b ether 00:0d:b9:1c:78:2d inet 24.240.198.186 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 24.240.198.191 inet6 fe80::20d:b9ff:fe1c:782d%vr1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 nd6 options=43 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active There's just a single IP set, though it does relay connections on other IPs, using proxy arp to do this so there is no need for an alias to be defined. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 19:48:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184CCF26 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:48:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70CD8FC12 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:48:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.11] ([192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qBTJRNPA004777; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:27:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:27:23 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Hill To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: static ip address and ifconfig In-Reply-To: <50DF41C8.5010503@a1poweruser.com> Message-ID: References: <50DF24BC.20507@a1poweruser.com> <20121229124207.110dca60@europa> <50DF30EA.1030408@a1poweruser.com> <20121229191604.cff1a883.freebsd@edvax.de> <0DC2CDCE-7A58-4F5D-AD27-6A4B46DD05ED@olivent.com> <50DF41C8.5010503@a1poweruser.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Polytropon , Mikel King , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 19:48:53 -0000 On Sat, 29 Dec 2012, Fbsd8 wrote: [ ... ] > My host just has ifconfig_xl0="DHCP" in rc.conf and xl0 is the NIC > connected to public internet connection coming from my ISP. In that case, you are not using static IPs. If your ISP has assigned you - as in Poly's example - 123.456.789.1 through 123.456.789.25, then those addresses are for your use to assign as you see fit. You would configure this machine's interface for any address in that block. You can then configure the same interface for more than one of those, or use your extra IPs for other machines (or interfaces). Instead of ifconfig_xl0="DHCP" in rc.conf, you might have ifconfig_xl0="123.456.789.16 255.255.255.128" or some such. HTH. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 20:17:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3D4823 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 20:17:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9358A8FC08 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 20:17:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (c80-217-70-175.bredband.comhem.se [80.217.70.175]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id qBTJsKW2009109; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 20:54:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <50DF498B.8020609@bananmonarki.se> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 20:50:35 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mhca12 Subject: Re: Full disk encryption without root partition References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 20:17:23 -0000 2012-12-26 22:17, mhca12 skrev: > Are there any plans or is there already support for full > disk encryption without the need for a root partition? Not exactly what asked for, but here it is http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=2775 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 21:16:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E364D89A for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 21:16:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03F98FC0C for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 21:16:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 29 Dec 2012 13:16:11 -0800 Message-ID: <50DF5D99.9020206@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 16:16:09 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dweimer@dweimer.net Subject: Re: static ip address and ifconfig References: "\"<50DF24BC.20507@a1poweruser.com>" <20121229124207.110dca60@europa>" <50DF30EA.1030408@a1poweruser.com> <20121229191604.cff1a883.freebsd@edvax.de> <50DF3A61.6040307@a1poweruser.com> <29b73b32ef10a5f868eb1e3bbc6a0a95@dweimer.net> In-Reply-To: <29b73b32ef10a5f868eb1e3bbc6a0a95@dweimer.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Dec 2012 21:16:11.0791 (UTC) FILETIME=[BA46D1F0:01CDE609] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Mikel King X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 21:16:11 -0000 snip previous > It still all depends on your configuration, it won't look any different > than a static private IP address shows when doing an ifconfig except it > will be the public IP. Generally if you have a static IP you will have > to set it manually, and it won't get it via DHCP. But I have worked > with some DSL connections though that assigned the static IP through a > DHCP reservation based on your modem/routers MAC address. However that > would only work for a single IP. If you get 25, you can assign those > with aliases to make a single server answer on the others as well, > common for servers hosting multiple https web sites. > > Here's an example with Aliases, its from a LAN with private range, but > would look no different except IPs if it was public range addresses. > This is from my web/email server (the very one this message comes from), > the secondary IP is for running jails, when testing upgrades. > > LAN: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 9000 > > options=209b > ether 00:07:e9:09:be:4f > inet 192.168.5.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.5.255 > inet 192.168.5.21 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.5.255 > nd6 options=29 > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) > status: active > > > Here's an example from a public range, pulled this from my pfSense box, > which is on a Cable Connection with a block of 5 static IP Addresses. > > vr1: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=8280b > ether 00:0d:b9:1c:78:2d > inet 24.240.198.186 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 24.240.198.191 > inet6 fe80::20d:b9ff:fe1c:782d%vr1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > nd6 options=43 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > > There's just a single IP set, though it does relay connections on other > IPs, using proxy arp to do this so there is no need for an alias to be > defined. > So your saying the ISP forwards any internet traffic for those static ip address to the on site "modem/router" MAC address which my service was previsioned to? The ISP is sending DNS port 53 and DHCP port 67 traffic on each static ip address as well? I can configure the on site modem/router to assign selected static ip address to a router's hardware port which is cabled to different PC's? The PC's would only be seeing traffic for that selected static ip address? The rc.config statement ifconfig_xl0="DHCP" on that PC would function as exspected? Now if I only had a on site "modem" with a single output port, then all the static ip address would hit the NIC card it was cabled to? So on the single FreeBSD system with NIC xl0 being cabled to the single port coming from the on site modem I would need ifconfig statements in rc.conf to select what static ip address I want to use for DHCP to automatically get the ISP's DSN ip address? Please correct my syntax if wrong ifconfig_xl0="DHCP,24.240.xxx.186" If I wanted to use the remaining static ip address for other PC's on my private LAN I would have to have additional ifconfig statements in rc.conf? ifconfig_xl0="alias,24.240.xxx.187,24.240.xxx.188,24.240.xxx.189" or would I need a single statement for each alias? Please correct my syntax if wrong. I would also have to configure my firewall to redirect those alias static ip address to the LAN ip address of the servers I want to target? For some of the remaining static ip address i have not used yet, I would like to use them for jails. Using the jail option to provide the interface name to bound to which automatically creates an alias for the jails ip address at jail start time and also removes it when the jail stopped. I can do this by creating the jail using one of the unused static ip address? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 21:42:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBBBFC6 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 21:42:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikel.king@olivent.com) Received: from mail.olivent.com (mail.olivent.com [75.99.82.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7EAB8FC08 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 21:42:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.olivent.com (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits)); Sat, 29 Dec 2012 16:40:24 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: static ip address and ifconfig From: Mikel King In-Reply-To: <50DF5D99.9020206@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 16:40:42 -0500 Message-Id: References: "\"<50DF24BC.20507@a1poweruser.com>" <20121229124207.110dca60@europa>" <50DF30EA.1030408@a1poweruser.com> <20121229191604.cff1a883.freebsd@edvax.de> <50DF3A61.6040307@a1poweruser.com> <29b73b32ef10a5f868eb1e3bbc6a0a95@dweimer.net> <50DF5D99.9020206@a1poweruser.com> To: Fbsd8 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 21:42:14 -0000 Well generally DHCP and static are mutually exclusive on the same = interface. Also bear in mind that DHCP is more comprehensive than a = simple address assignment system. In addition a static reservation is = not the same thing as a static IP address assignment on an interface. = They are similar but different. A DHCP assignment will bind one address to a MAC as well as configure = address resolution, routing et cettera=85 Whereas a static IP assignment = must be configured manually by you the human and not the ISP. Your ISP = can route a block of addresses to you via a CPE like a DSL modem or = router but you have to configure your equipment to consume the traffic = passed on by that device.=20 For instance my cable provider's modem boots DHCP, as does the router = that they configure via DHCP net boot so that it may receive the block = of static IP addresses assigned to my account. The router itself = consumes the first usable address as delivered by the ISP. I am free to = assign the remain 5 addresses to any device be-it a firewall or server = at my discretion and connect it to the LAN side of this router. The = following is sort of what these static assignment will look like on this = server. xl1: flags=3D8863 mtu 1500 ether 00:17:02:d3:84:6f=20 inet 75.99.82.91 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 75.99.82.95 inet 75.99.82.93 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 75.99.82.95 inet 75.99.82.92 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 75.99.82.95 media: autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active Regards, Mikel King Senior Editor, BSD News http://bsdnews.net On Dec 29, 2012, at 4:16 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > snip previous >> It still all depends on your configuration, it won't look any = different than a static private IP address shows when doing an ifconfig = except it will be the public IP. Generally if you have a static IP you = will have to set it manually, and it won't get it via DHCP. But I have = worked with some DSL connections though that assigned the static IP = through a DHCP reservation based on your modem/routers MAC address. = However that would only work for a single IP. If you get 25, you can = assign those with aliases to make a single server answer on the others = as well, common for servers hosting multiple https web sites. >> Here's an example with Aliases, its from a LAN with private range, = but would look no different except IPs if it was public range addresses. = This is from my web/email server (the very one this message comes = from), the secondary IP is for running jails, when testing upgrades. >> LAN: flags=3D8843 metric 0 = mtu 9000 >> = options=3D209b >> ether 00:07:e9:09:be:4f >> inet 192.168.5.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.5.255 >> inet 192.168.5.21 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.5.255 >> nd6 options=3D29 >> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) >> status: active >> Here's an example from a public range, pulled this from my pfSense = box, which is on a Cable Connection with a block of 5 static IP = Addresses. >> vr1: flags=3D8843 metric 0 = mtu 1500 >> = options=3D8280b >> ether 00:0d:b9:1c:78:2d >> inet 24.240.198.186 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 24.240.198.191 >> inet6 fe80::20d:b9ff:fe1c:782d%vr1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 >> nd6 options=3D43 >> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >> status: active >> There's just a single IP set, though it does relay connections on = other IPs, using proxy arp to do this so there is no need for an alias = to be defined. >=20 > So your saying the ISP forwards any internet traffic for those static = ip address to the on site "modem/router" MAC address which my service = was previsioned to? >=20 > The ISP is sending DNS port 53 and DHCP port 67 traffic on each static = ip address as well? >=20 > I can configure the on site modem/router to assign selected static ip = address to a router's hardware port which is cabled to different PC's? >=20 > The PC's would only be seeing traffic for that selected static ip = address? >=20 > The rc.config statement ifconfig_xl0=3D"DHCP" on that PC would = function as exspected? >=20 >=20 > Now if I only had a on site "modem" with a single output port, then > all the static ip address would hit the NIC card it was cabled to? >=20 > So on the single FreeBSD system with NIC xl0 being cabled to the = single port coming from the on site modem I would need ifconfig = statements in rc.conf to select what static ip address I want to use for = DHCP to automatically get the ISP's DSN ip address? Please correct my = syntax if wrong > ifconfig_xl0=3D"DHCP,24.240.xxx.186" >=20 > If I wanted to use the remaining static ip address for other PC's on = my private LAN I would have to have additional ifconfig statements in = rc.conf? > ifconfig_xl0=3D"alias,24.240.xxx.187,24.240.xxx.188,24.240.xxx.189" > or would I need a single statement for each alias? Please correct my = syntax if wrong. >=20 > I would also have to configure my firewall to redirect those alias = static ip address to the LAN ip address of the servers I want to target? >=20 > For some of the remaining static ip address i have not used yet, I = would like to use them for jails. Using the jail option to provide the > interface name to bound to which automatically creates an alias for = the jails ip address at jail start time and also removes it when the = jail stopped. I can do this by creating the jail using one of the unused = static ip address? >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 21:47:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E58B107 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 21:47:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@martinlaabs.de) Received: from relay04.alfahosting-server.de (relay04.alfahosting-server.de [109.237.142.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4AB8FC08 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 21:47:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by relay04.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2A0DB32C55EC; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:47:25 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-DCC: : X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 Received: from alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de (alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de [109.237.140.30]) by relay04.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2B032C553B for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:47:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from pc.martinlaabs.de (p54B338B5.dip.t-dialin.net [84.179.56.181]) by alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B435515D5CB for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:47:23 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50DF64E9.8070106@martinlaabs.de> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:47:21 +0100 From: Martin Laabs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: [solved] Malformed UTF-8 in x11-toolkits/p5-Gtk2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Status: No X-Virus-Checker-Version: clamassassin 1.2.4 with ClamAV 0.97.3/16196/Sat Dec 29 20:38:50 2012 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 21:47:28 -0000 Hi, I am currently building the x11-toolkits/p5-Gtk2 port and get the following errors: ------------------:<---------------------- arsing XS files... Creating stock items POD... Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected end of string) in length at tools/podifystockitems.pl line 52. Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected end of string) in length at tools/podifystockitems.pl line 52. Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected end of string) in length at tools/podifystockitems.pl line 52. Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected end of string) in length at tools/podifystockitems.pl line 52. Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected end of string) in length at tools/podifystockitems.pl line 52. Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected end of string) in length at tools/podifystockitems.pl line 52. Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected non-continuation byte 0x67, immediately after start byte 0xfc) in printf at tools/podifystockitems.pl line 68. Code point 0x0000 is not Unicode, may not be portable at tools/podifystockitems.pl line 68. [...]Generating POD... Loaded 9 extra types from doctypes Loaded 2 extra types from /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.2/mach/Pango/Install/doctypes Loaded 8 extra types from /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.2/mach/Glib/Install/doctypes Loaded 7 extra types from /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.2/mach/Cairo/Install/doctypes Malformed UTF-8 character (fatal) at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.2/mach/Data/Dumper.pm line 682. gmake: *** [build/podindex] Fehler 25 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/p5-Gtk2. -----------------------:<----------------------------- The cause is the environmental variable LC_ALL that was set to "de_DE.ISO8859-1" for me. Unsetting it with unset LC_ALL (if you use bash) resolve the problem. Best regards, Martin Laabs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 21:56:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38A52B5 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 21:56:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@martinlaabs.de) Received: from relay04.alfahosting-server.de (relay04.alfahosting-server.de [109.237.142.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1978FC0A for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 21:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by relay04.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D68A732C1541; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:43:32 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-DCC: : X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_50,SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 Received: from alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de (alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de [109.237.140.30]) by relay04.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784FD32C1CA2 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:43:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from pc.martinlaabs.de (p54B338B5.dip.t-dialin.net [84.179.56.181]) by alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33977515D5CB for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:43:31 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50DF6401.50001@martinlaabs.de> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:43:29 +0100 From: Martin Laabs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Full disk encryption without root partition References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Status: No X-Virus-Checker-Version: clamassassin 1.2.4 with ClamAV 0.97.3/16196/Sat Dec 29 20:38:50 2012 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 21:56:07 -0000 Hi, >> Are there any plans or is there already support for full >> disk encryption without the need for a boot partition? Well - what would be your benefit? OK - you might not create another partition but I think this is not the problem. >From the point of security you would not get any improvement because some type of software has to be unencrypted. And this software could be manipulated to do things like e.g. send the encryption key to . So from this point of view there is no difference whether the kernel is unencrypted or any other type of software (that runs before the kernel) is unencrypted. There is a solution named secureboot together with TPM but this introduces some other aspects that are not so very welcome in the open source community. So from the security point of view it might be a good choice to have a unencrypted and (hardware) readonly boot partition. Best regards, Martin Laabs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 22:38:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F88B7D for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:38:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2518FC08 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.52]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F438A70ABE for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 17:38:28 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 17409 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2012 22:38:27 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 15698, pid: 19037, t: 0.1596s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:13513 Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 29 Dec 2012 22:38:27 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B532933C18; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 17:38:21 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 1FE3A39829; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 17:38:21 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: static ip address and ifconfig References: <50DF24BC.20507@a1poweruser.com> <20121229124207.110dca60@europa> <50DF30EA.1030408@a1poweruser.com> <20121229191604.cff1a883.freebsd@edvax.de> <50DF3A61.6040307@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 17:38:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: <50DF3A61.6040307@a1poweruser.com> (fbsd8@a1poweruser.com's message of "Sat, 29 Dec 2012 13:45:53 -0500") Message-ID: <44licglc0y.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:38:35 -0000 Fbsd8 writes: > For anyone being a professional company who wants permanent presents > on the internet will pay extra fees for static ip > address because static ip address never change and this is required for > domain name registration. Dynamic ip address are normally assigned by the > ISP for home users having dsl or tv cable internet connections. Dynamic > ip address can change and if used for domain name registration the users > FQDN will no longer point to the correct host. In the interests of figuring out the right kind of answer here: Do you understand the different types of DNS records? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 22:52:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17528E8A for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:52:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F468FC12 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:52:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:52:54 -0800 Message-ID: <50DF7444.8080409@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 17:52:52 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mikel King Subject: Re: static ip address and ifconfig References: "\"<50DF24BC.20507@a1poweruser.com>" <20121229124207.110dca60@europa>" <50DF30EA.1030408@a1poweruser.com> <20121229191604.cff1a883.freebsd@edvax.de> <50DF3A61.6040307@a1poweruser.com> <29b73b32ef10a5f868eb1e3bbc6a0a95@dweimer.net> <50DF5D99.9020206@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Dec 2012 22:52:55.0039 (UTC) FILETIME=[3D4830F0:01CDE617] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:52:55 -0000 >> snip previous >>> It still all depends on your configuration, it won't look any >>> different than a static private IP address shows when doing an >>> ifconfig except it will be the public IP. Generally if you have a >>> static IP you will have to set it manually, and it won't get it via >>> DHCP. But I have worked with some DSL connections though that >>> assigned the static IP through a DHCP reservation based on your >>> modem/routers MAC address. However that would only work for a single >>> IP. If you get 25, you can assign those with aliases to make a >>> single server answer on the others as well, common for servers >>> hosting multiple https web sites. >>> Here's an example with Aliases, its from a LAN with private range, >>> but would look no different except IPs if it was public range >>> addresses. This is from my web/email server (the very one this >>> message comes from), the secondary IP is for running jails, when >>> testing upgrades. >>> LAN: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 9000 >>> options=209b >>> ether 00:07:e9:09:be:4f >>> inet 192.168.5.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.5.255 >>> inet 192.168.5.21 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.5.255 >>> nd6 options=29 >>> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) >>> status: active >>> Here's an example from a public range, pulled this from my pfSense >>> box, which is on a Cable Connection with a block of 5 static IP >>> Addresses. >>> vr1: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 >>> options=8280b >>> ether 00:0d:b9:1c:78:2d >>> inet 24.240.198.186 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 24.240.198.191 >>> inet6 fe80::20d:b9ff:fe1c:782d%vr1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 >>> nd6 options=43 >>> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >>> status: active >>> There's just a single IP set, though it does relay connections on >>> other IPs, using proxy arp to do this so there is no need for an >>> alias to be defined. >> >> So your saying the ISP forwards any internet traffic for those static >> ip address to the on site "modem/router" MAC address which my service >> was previsioned to? >> >> The ISP is sending DNS port 53 and DHCP port 67 traffic on each static >> ip address as well? >> >> I can configure the on site modem/router to assign selected static ip >> address to a router's hardware port which is cabled to different PC's? >> >> The PC's would only be seeing traffic for that selected static ip address? >> >> The rc.config statement ifconfig_xl0="DHCP" on that PC would function >> as exspected? >> >> >> Now if I only had a on site "modem" with a single output port, then >> all the static ip address would hit the NIC card it was cabled to? >> >> So on the single FreeBSD system with NIC xl0 being cabled to the >> single port coming from the on site modem I would need ifconfig >> statements in rc.conf to select what static ip address I want to use >> for DHCP to automatically get the ISP's DSN ip address? Please >> correct my syntax if wrong >> ifconfig_xl0="DHCP,24.240.xxx.186" >> >> If I wanted to use the remaining static ip address for other PC's on >> my private LAN I would have to have additional ifconfig statements in >> rc.conf? >> ifconfig_xl0="alias,24.240.xxx.187,24.240.xxx.188,24.240.xxx.189" >> or would I need a single statement for each alias? Please correct my >> syntax if wrong. >> >> I would also have to configure my firewall to redirect those alias >> static ip address to the LAN ip address of the servers I want to target? >> >> For some of the remaining static ip address i have not used yet, I >> would like to use them for jails. Using the jail option to provide the >> interface name to bound to which automatically creates an alias for >> the jails ip address at jail start time and also removes it when the >> jail stopped. I can do this by creating the jail using one of the >> unused static ip address? >> >> Mikel King wrote: > Well generally DHCP and static are mutually exclusive on the same > interface. Also bear in mind that DHCP is more comprehensive than a > simple address assignment system. In addition a static reservation is > not the same thing as a static IP address assignment on an interface. > They are similar but different. > > A DHCP assignment will bind one address to a MAC as well as configure > address resolution, routing et cettera… Whereas a static IP assignment > must be configured manually by you the human and not the ISP. Your ISP > can route a block of addresses to you via a CPE like a DSL modem or > router but you have to configure your equipment to consume the traffic > passed on by that device. > > For instance my cable provider's modem boots DHCP, as does the router > that they configure via DHCP net boot so that it may receive the block > of static IP addresses assigned to my account. The router itself > consumes the first usable address as delivered by the ISP. I am free to > assign the remain 5 addresses to any device be-it a firewall or server > at my discretion and connect it to the LAN side of this router. The > following is sort of what these static assignment will look like on this > server. > > xl1: flags=8863 mtu 1500 > ether 00:17:02:d3:84:6f > inet 75.99.82.91 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 75.99.82.95 > inet 75.99.82.93 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 75.99.82.95 > inet 75.99.82.92 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 75.99.82.95 > media: autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > > Regards, > Mikel King > Senior Editor, BSD News > http://bsdnews.net > > Your talking in general terms which does not help me, I need details. You said above "Whereas a static IP assignment must be configured manually by you the human and not the ISP." I tried to show this human manual configuration in my above post. What are you purposing as human manual configuration? I need syntax of commands used in response to my above post. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 22:53:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD43F24 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:53:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB098FC0A for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:53:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA570276AE; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:53:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id qBTMrJDX003182; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:53:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:53:19 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Martin Laabs Subject: Re: Full disk encryption without root partition Message-Id: <20121229235319.2ee5cb85.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <50DF6401.50001@martinlaabs.de> References: <50DF6401.50001@martinlaabs.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:53:24 -0000 On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:43:29 +0100, Martin Laabs wrote: > So from the security point of view it might be a good choice to have a > unencrypted and (hardware) readonly boot partition. To prevent unintended modification by of the boot process's components, an option would be to have the system boot from a R/O media (SD card, USB stick or USB "card in stick") and then _remove_ this media when the system has been booted. Of course this requires physical presence of some kind of operator who is confirmed to handle this specific media. The rest of the system on disk and the data may be encrypted now, and if (physically) stolen, the disks are useless. I agree that such kind of security isn't possible everywhere, especially not if you cannot physically access your server. To prevent further "bad things" (like someone steals this "boot stick"), manually entering a passphrase in combination with the keys on the stick could be required. Of course a strong passphrase would have to be chosen, and not written on the USB stick. :-) The options has on a _running_ system with encrypted components is a completely different topic. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 23:09:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFFE55A for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:09:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865728FC08 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:09:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B033924ABF; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 00:09:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id qBTN9fH3003245; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 00:09:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 00:09:41 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: static ip address and ifconfig Message-Id: <20121230000941.06510aa0.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <50DF7444.8080409@a1poweruser.com> References: <50DF24BC.20507@a1poweruser.com> <20121229124207.110dca60@europa> <50DF30EA.1030408@a1poweruser.com> <20121229191604.cff1a883.freebsd@edvax.de> <50DF3A61.6040307@a1poweruser.com> <29b73b32ef10a5f868eb1e3bbc6a0a95@dweimer.net> <50DF5D99.9020206@a1poweruser.com> <50DF7444.8080409@a1poweruser.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:09:39 -0000 On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 17:52:52 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > Your talking in general terms which does not help me, I need details. > You said above "Whereas a static IP assignment must be configured > manually by you the human and not the ISP." > > I tried to show this human manual configuration in my above post. > What are you purposing as human manual configuration? > I need syntax of commands used in response to my above post. This basically means you do not actually use DHCP for your "client" machines (or better: for _your_ machines, be it servers, desktop computers or firewalls); instead you have to configure the components that would be DHCP's task on a dynamic IP connection. This is: 1. In /etc/rc.conf you need to configure the NIC(s) of your system to the IPs you want them to have: hostname="foo.example.com" ifconfig_xl0="inet 123.456.789.10 netmask 0xffffff00" ifconfig_xl1="inet 123.456.789.11 netmask 0xffffff00" defaultrouter="123.456.777.100" Maybe your ISP also defines a default router for you. 2. In /etc/resolv.conf, you have to define name servers if you need them (or you run your own one). Typically the ISP will tell you which NS _he_ offers. search example.com nameserver 123.456.700.100 3. You would also add entries to /etc/hosts reflecting your host's settings: 123.456.789.10 foo.example.com foo 123.456.789.11 foo.example.com foo All this implies that those settings are quite static. But for a static IP that might be fully desired. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 23:10:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0E85F5 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:10:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8C18FC08 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:09:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 29 Dec 2012 15:10:01 -0800 Message-ID: <50DF7847.5010603@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:09:59 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org Subject: Re: static ip address and ifconfig References: <50DF24BC.20507@a1poweruser.com> <20121229124207.110dca60@europa> <50DF30EA.1030408@a1poweruser.com> <20121229191604.cff1a883.freebsd@edvax.de> <50DF3A61.6040307@a1poweruser.com> <44licglc0y.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <44licglc0y.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Dec 2012 23:10:01.0387 (UTC) FILETIME=[A10877B0:01CDE619] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:10:00 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Fbsd8 writes: > >> For anyone being a professional company who wants permanent presents >> on the internet will pay extra fees for static ip >> address because static ip address never change and this is required for >> domain name registration. Dynamic ip address are normally assigned by the >> ISP for home users having dsl or tv cable internet connections. Dynamic >> ip address can change and if used for domain name registration the users >> FQDN will no longer point to the correct host. > > In the interests of figuring out the right kind of answer here: > > Do you understand the different types of DNS records? > Yes I have basic DNS processing understanding. But lets not get side tracked by something the question is not asking about. Please Focus on the part of the post you cut out which is asking about static ip addressees. Thank you anyway From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 23:14:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C3F7F9 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:14:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikel.king@olivent.com) Received: from mail.olivent.com (mail.olivent.com [75.99.82.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B91CE8FC08 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.olivent.com (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits)); Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:13:36 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: static ip address and ifconfig From: Mikel King In-Reply-To: <50DF7444.8080409@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:13:54 -0500 Message-Id: <6EC82056-7FEE-43F3-B00C-9FB0FF98E09F@olivent.com> References: "\"<50DF24BC.20507@a1poweruser.com>" <20121229124207.110dca60@europa>" <50DF30EA.1030408@a1poweruser.com> <20121229191604.cff1a883.freebsd@edvax.de> <50DF3A61.6040307@a1poweruser.com> <29b73b32ef10a5f868eb1e3bbc6a0a95@dweimer.net> <50DF5D99.9020206@a1poweruser.com> <50DF7444.8080409@a1poweruser.com> To: Fbsd8 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:14:07 -0000 On Dec 29, 2012, at 5:52 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: >>> ifconfig_xl0=3D"alias,24.240.xxx.187,24.240.xxx.188,24.240.xxx.189" ifconfig_xl0=3D"inet 24.240.198.186 netmask 0xfffffff8" ifconfig_xl0_alias0=3D"inet 24.240.198.187 netmask 0xfffffff8" ifconfig_xl0_alias1=3D"inet 24.240.198.188 netmask 0xfffffff8" ifconfig_xl0_alias2=3D"inet 24.240.198.189 netmask 0xfffffff8" =85 ifconfig_xl0_alias24=3D"inet 24.240.198.210 netmask 0xfffffff8" You can change the netmask of the aliases to 0xffffffff if you are = experiencing too much broadcast chatter. Regards, Mikel King Senior Editor, BSD News http://bsdnews.net= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 23:26:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2DFB80 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:26:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com (mail-we0-f174.google.com [74.125.82.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897B18FC08 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f174.google.com with SMTP id x10so5405495wey.5 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 15:26:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RHyBHGh1gg0zPvQtY/RRTPaU8mglLV/Y3LYTxZUhixI=; b=K7BF3Q0MwWiN8WIe11j9Gk7oabRGgYurbOYZwSHG2Iu6ft04WbO4L9t/ccY2vEaWKY ZSejAwFWPMaKgPME2ETSJ+N3A0QJHoVAEl0RtmoshkgjzI85vkcFHeyd9oykslwynC4f hwT3KOlA/n3fPAHM+oMGxLi7OHS7oJHEfWe5oHa8Gr8eSTgx2g7AksbsXiJ1tRwuSHcv qxOb+9i78T+hempjDtX64VNeafAcRtqNiU7Wv8a4ngVnpBede2CzSukomqz+9Yt8FXxR mxWLZew/t0G8LlY6jPr/8hbHxrHWq3zs1VIjFyiqROS8KvP9P+o4ERPZBUxjCID3uAf0 /+Bg== X-Received: by 10.194.9.197 with SMTP id c5mr59316584wjb.20.1356823562381; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 15:26:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fv2sm68826305wib.4.2012.12.29.15.26.00 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 29 Dec 2012 15:26:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:25:59 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Full disk encryption without root partition Message-ID: <20121229232559.6997b182@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <50DF6401.50001@martinlaabs.de> References: <50DF6401.50001@martinlaabs.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:26:05 -0000 On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:43:29 +0100 Martin Laabs wrote: > Hi, > > >> Are there any plans or is there already support for full > >> disk encryption without the need for a boot partition? > > Well - what would be your benefit? OK - you might not create another > partition but I think this is not the problem. > From the point of security you would not get any improvement because > some > type of software has to be unencrypted. And this software could be > manipulated to do things like e.g. send the encryption key to > . So from this point of view there is no difference whether > the kernel is unencrypted or any other type of software (that runs > before the kernel) is unencrypted. And the advantage of putting the boot partition on a memory stick is that it's much easier to keep such a device physically secure. Bootstrapping code on the main hard drive is easier to attack. IIRC someone demonstrated such an attack against one of the commercial encryption packages. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 29 23:34:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F23C3B for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:34:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1B98FC0A for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.48]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7793A7234F for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:34:28 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 12511 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2012 23:34:28 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 21007, pid: 30917, t: 0.2012s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 29 Dec 2012 23:34:28 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B113233C18; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:34:22 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 6298339829; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:34:22 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: static ip address and ifconfig References: <50DF24BC.20507@a1poweruser.com> <20121229124207.110dca60@europa> <50DF30EA.1030408@a1poweruser.com> <20121229191604.cff1a883.freebsd@edvax.de> <50DF3A61.6040307@a1poweruser.com> <44licglc0y.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <50DF7847.5010603@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:34:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <50DF7847.5010603@a1poweruser.com> (fbsd8@a1poweruser.com's message of "Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:09:59 -0500") Message-ID: <448v8gl9fl.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:34:29 -0000 Fbsd8 writes: > Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> Fbsd8 writes: >> >>> For anyone being a professional company who wants permanent presents >>> on the internet will pay extra fees for static ip >>> address because static ip address never change and this is required for >>> domain name registration. Dynamic ip address are normally assigned by the >>> ISP for home users having dsl or tv cable internet connections. Dynamic >>> ip address can change and if used for domain name registration the users >>> FQDN will no longer point to the correct host. >> >> In the interests of figuring out the right kind of answer here: >> >> Do you understand the different types of DNS records? >> > > Yes I have basic DNS processing understanding. > But lets not get side tracked by something the question is not asking > about. Please Focus on the part of the post you cut out which is > asking about static ip addressees. Okay, good. I'll assume that the DNS issues aren't relevant, then. The simple answer is: the IP address(es) shown by 'ifconfig' will be the ones actually bound to that interface on that machine. Without knowing *how* you're binding those addresses, we can't tell you which of your 25 "static" addresses are bound on any particular machine. In most cases, I expect static addresses to be directly configured on the specific machine in question. Since you control that machine, and don't know what address(es) are configured, that probably isn't the case. As a second possibility, the addresses are allocated statically, but the host is configured via DHCP, from a server that knows those addresses are statically assigned to that host by hardware address or some other DHCP option. In this case, there will almost certainly be exactly one of your 25 static IP addresses bound to this specific host's network interface. But, again, the key piece of information is how the addresses are getting bound.