Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 01:37:57 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: "Simon L. B. Nielsen" <simon@freebsd.org> Cc: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>, freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bumping a pet bug Message-ID: <20120121233757.GB31224@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <cf3505af4577b689ea951e21ef51bcb5@nitro.dk> References: <4F14F4FF.902@erdgeist.org> <20120120230300.GE87357@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <cf3505af4577b689ea951e21ef51bcb5@nitro.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--XHgFapH+pGmRGlpQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 11:43:06PM +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: > I think in most cases if devfs mount fails you will likely not end up=20 > with a jail where you can do much... rather many things expect /dev/null= =20 > etc. >=20 > It is possible to just disable the devfs mount completely for a jail if= =20 > you want the jail to start up anyway without devfs so I think it would=20 > be OK to simply skip the jail if we cannot mount devfs - and complain=20 > loudly. >=20 > Anybody have any cases where this would be a problem? Just curious. Why devfs mounts can fail ? --XHgFapH+pGmRGlpQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk8bTFUACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4jXygCg4H+XU/s+Caq2FL9thNBbpmZd jBEAoIBhE2+LKAqn7646Y/EtvV310phX =Y7/U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XHgFapH+pGmRGlpQ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120121233757.GB31224>