From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 15 11:20:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66924106566B for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:20:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A03B8FC0A for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:20:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1SJNVU-0005k1-0d>; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:20:36 +0200 Received: from e178032100.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.32.100] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1SJNVT-0003Ca-RU>; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:20:36 +0200 Message-ID: <4F8AAEF7.3090800@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:20:23 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Kojedzinszky References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF0D98E26C984CBD583EA5B0C" X-Originating-IP: 85.178.32.100 Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd) X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:20:37 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF0D98E26C984CBD583EA5B0C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 04/14/12 21:37, schrieb Richard Kojedzinszky: > Dear list, >=20 > Although it is not only security-related question, I did not get any > answer from freebsd-performance. The original question is below. >=20 > Can someone give some advice? >=20 > Thanks in advance, >=20 >=20 > Kojedzinszky Richard > Euronet Magyarorszag Informatikai Zrt. >=20 > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 06:16:57 +0100 (CET) > From: Richard Kojedzinszky > To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org > Subject: ufs multilabel performance >=20 > Dear List, >=20 > I've noticed that when I enable multilabel on an fs, a file creation > gets around 20-30 times slower than without multilabel set. >=20 > This one-liner can be used to test the differences: > $ truss -D perl -e 'open(F, ">$_.file") for 1 .. 1000' Same here, creating files seems to be 10 - 30 times slower with multilabels as it is without. But as several posts and discussions reflects, FreeBSD isn't supposed to be fast although it is claimed that writing is the major than reading; FBSD should serve functionality. >=20 > And one can see that the open call takes much more when multilabel is > set on an fs. It seems that only file creation needs that many time, > when a file exists it is opened much faster. >=20 > Could someone acknowledge this, and have some suggestions how to make i= t > faster? >=20 > Regards, >=20 >=20 > Kojedzinszky Richard > TvNetWork Nyrt. > E-mail: krichy (at) tvnetwork [dot] hu > PGP: 0x54B2BF0C8F59B1B7 > Fingerprint =3D F6D4 3FFE AF03 CACF 0DCB 46A1 54B2 BF0C 8F59 B1B7 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.= org" --------------enigF0D98E26C984CBD583EA5B0C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPiq8DAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8CMIIAJDE2q87nR7cdwrxNdZnJtl3 +VL5xs13MD5/2TLLpwjFnwFUT0JfEWLHGt9L8eQSQq6Ec4ZJdooyfdjzdYN9Q8NO ykd4lUjnPeEzcUdjjiftY8BFsHomMM8PHZi9GDROJnzPT1c29GxNXLafwZxDGPq0 DvnKDXMjLaYf/SE1MKRIofyzXwJHsu7nbLcQJj4ZOv+W5FMkRwqIadFMux2VhNxc nAVPK1CVsoc8o1BVY2h5GGQ+Z6ww0WYgJYr/ekkwNAOxh3xFDklxQgNPuIOSwhMt VlQXUie5esAjaQ8PDRC14lHSEhCALgT27lTtGqWI9CageTgxljfkncZ+IY9xUiY= =dMKB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF0D98E26C984CBD583EA5B0C--