From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 03:18:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDF5C97 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 03:18:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F798FC14 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 03:18:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Toshi.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2] (may be forged)) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA11257 for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2012 20:18:51 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 20:18:44 -0700 To: stable@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass Subject: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 03:18:55 -0000 Just checking in, yet again, to ask about the status of FreeBSD 9.1. We've been delaying construction of new servers (which we wanted to build during the US Thanksgiving holiday) until the release, and really want to be able to work on them over Christmas. I understand that the release was held back by server security issues and possibly by problems with CLANG's failure to emulate obscure quirks of GCC; are these now resolved? Is there anything else on the "TODO" list (the version on the Wiki is of no help; it's woefully out of date) to be done prior to release? Does the FreeBSD project need a fresh server to be donated to handle the release? --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 03:39:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC13360 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 03:39:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F408FC08 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 03:39:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id fo14so2008468vcb.13 for ; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 19:39:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=hsJKkDhSG/JmEv9QYT/ACx6n23E/AGsY4+g4XwV/BGI=; b=X0QeB+AzY4g/W0DMdIutyD3MS3NDwGTbQI+SOm9u48H5mMFzrlBqfnEtU6LkFZhy/B mGbm0IdkqUSKHzBaBeRILFz4jh81YCu60w+uuXaeo3rPPDQqmEqShpzRhlj1fDS9IWXr iHUYZbEsqVIiEkTb9tekoa8MRNAvyBi8k0tMrkKa51131O4Cn4/6KNfoIoxLBjX9KiYG J8yArBgEfNH/tfQ5G2DdkWyBzc4WcC8zuojcmkIx1sYXaHIoLFL1IAOhGA+zaJAlFJjl /ZY+0yu1fuJPQU8+AM5eko2OvMTp8qPDNjprga3iJueqtip3aq2nVE0m3aqIvNtrYqlZ UrHw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.67.133 with SMTP id n5mr5763955vdt.24.1355024343554; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 19:39:03 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.58.201.202 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Dec 2012 19:39:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 19:39:03 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2v95IewPbMpbIQomttHMU_dqHoc Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? From: Adrian Chadd To: Brett Glass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 03:39:04 -0000 It's still progressing, albeit slowly. There's been a lot of security checking going on in the background as part of this task and that takes time. Adrian From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 04:26:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144B139A for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 04:26:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpet@sdf.org) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCA68FC16 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 04:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (dsl-187-150-86-144-dyn.prod-infinitum.com.mx [187.150.86.144] (may be forged)) (authenticated (0 bits)) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qB94QZ2R001979 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 04:26:36 GMT Message-ID: <50C412F6.7040300@sdf.org> Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 22:26:30 -0600 From: Chris Petrik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> In-Reply-To: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 04:26:43 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It will be released when it is ready. On 12/8/2012 9:18 PM, Brett Glass wrote: > Just checking in, yet again, to ask about the status of FreeBSD > 9.1. We've been delaying construction of new servers (which we > wanted to build during the US Thanksgiving holiday) until the > release, and really want to be able to work on them over Christmas. > I understand that the release was held back by server security > issues and possibly by problems with CLANG's failure to emulate > obscure quirks of GCC; are these now resolved? Is there anything > else on the "TODO" list (the version on the Wiki is of no help; > it's woefully out of date) to be done prior to release? Does the > FreeBSD project need a fresh server to be donated to handle the > release? > > --Brett Glass > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To > unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQxBL1AAoJEAGnn5Nn8qWUrPAH/2cgbQ3BYL+E6B1C0Vce0XNY Yxf7IQByzLCsmdXJW62OZoXkOvS1RV/bPFqqiOtd/Vl6v7eaxQgXmXTZuf401eRD FHz2/j9j0BouVnU2nOwcrQxrjB5phjqpAe/87MWrqR2/bQFt3/b7x5EC/oB1hKJ6 5S5A0/Yukh//gpaA5LcMxLZuus3xmRKA7zUugiYi9x8eis+pNu/7n470nnKtZKkZ pRvGxr4F/olUqj0yOw/Pqap9a41Xc4R8L1MjZfbu2fs5ob60qPMva00WEhBgOKQy xfkLFU7hHj+KaZ3AqdoHQbmsiKrMjjK/q1aeibS8nEDMB+RF8T8xoCd33P33960= =aroh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 11:26:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8A5552 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 11:26:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ia0-f182.google.com (mail-ia0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F518FC08 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 11:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f182.google.com with SMTP id x2so4204655iad.27 for ; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 03:26:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=f0wNDxapO9TKITuE7kciTytq0LaWvWC1KHIrqcf8zOA=; b=aDWwD2KJga5VxAkueANVHZrL/bj7Ev+c2IpolNCOhpPMvcVIT8Ach3krToac9dQ+TW 26hI/nofG+4OXZEkfbMQqM4Z7Tgco3gGVAqpiX86+rdDfq2J4HchPYLWtBkws8zgsoQz n/d96LYb73Ft6ZqMew3a0YJxkhwdgSiAV132pc3Ea9wTMV2Yg2O1sHBnJLV00pokgH8P 5XbxnkYrKPBxaNqAATp1XC0zFwllmkkTZad0PCcQaB2q/NHcLTdt6XXztzigoT7f6taZ Xi6KUupTomgUZ5e3u2pWMtqPRh2N26n08+Ag55911vdbjY9dw8DhEAz6mBrUyfwpTWYc n9eQ== Received: by 10.50.33.169 with SMTP id s9mr3732296igi.19.1355052395703; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 03:26:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from luna.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com. [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id az6sm3465080igb.11.2012.12.09.03.26.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 09 Dec 2012 03:26:34 -0800 (PST) From: ajtiM To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 05:26:26 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-RC3; KDE/4.8.4; i386; ; ) References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C412F6.7040300@sdf.org> In-Reply-To: <50C412F6.7040300@sdf.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201212090526.26535.lumiwa@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Petrik X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 11:26:41 -0000 On Saturday 08 December 2012 22:26:30 Chris Petrik wrote: > It will be released when it is ready. > Perfect answer... And one hour after release thounsands of new ports for building on Christmas time ): Mitja -------- http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 13:48:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780E76FC for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 13:48:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517468FC0C for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 13:48:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ThhEq-0006nn-73 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 05:48:12 -0800 Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 05:48:12 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1355060892204-5767785.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <201212090526.26535.lumiwa@gmail.com> References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C412F6.7040300@sdf.org> <201212090526.26535.lumiwa@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:48:13 -0000 This is good answer for end users, not so much when somebody is genuinely concerned if there were some unforeseen issues. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Will-we-get-a-RELEASE-9-1-for-Christmas-tp5767716p5767785.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 13:51:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFEC8A2 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 13:51:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2B68FC13 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 13:51:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ThhI7-0006yL-GK for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 05:51:35 -0800 Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 05:51:35 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1355061095500-5767789.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1355060892204-5767785.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C412F6.7040300@sdf.org> <201212090526.26535.lumiwa@gmail.com> <1355060892204-5767785.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:51:36 -0000 ...so needless to say, I prefer one provided by developer (in this case Adrian's), even if it is laconic. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Will-we-get-a-RELEASE-9-1-for-Christmas-tp5767716p5767789.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 14:04:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A6AC32 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 14:04:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com (mail-la0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6457E8FC13 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 14:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id j13so1743690lah.13 for ; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 06:04:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=JytpH+dZmfBIfVCUp1CncSly/DyRxxBVkB5DcY+kGZo=; b=leuA37TgauUN+VdrhUGHKmVbeGcvlm8S2UOiRbUhVto28ZlK3SM3nWxvYIwEWi+MSr 5aQwox/KsIJvnZH/fIJeRRCbmRNCf380gAWRV0L7OHXRigfYSo5mRSwr/DKy+9Yj4jym AGSaiSZTAuGzLJDkjj7V2xDGvyWHg7TVqVJHw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=JytpH+dZmfBIfVCUp1CncSly/DyRxxBVkB5DcY+kGZo=; b=NyMrKjV1QORqkTqMxRUX3jkZOekh9BHyItHuurfozvrOAHKlnQ0sA2BpyYLV+3JRcy 0bhexi11wHRUQBdvSeo2eIeq/6I6wunNtzxTpgaZ09A1Lm6elfmhlfqDGD62HR1QSoby cOBZ9V0xIzyaDuHvrT3BHuNr14usV49BKwP1VcsmolElT244q5M7YoyBYyZ0jXtRCkmM 7eOg6EaUe4IGnSJAZ5rmKBdCSA3vtUKvEgK7Xn8Q/NbqdEQ3Xn+L13NPvcafm102zNE4 iHv1Nx8K4vy1izjNXVLDk5QqOVoJR8b5oMI1+M8tZaEMA+74EJ/jrcYhV78105cg8y5z HVDQ== Received: by 10.112.83.100 with SMTP id p4mr4820176lby.96.1355061895797; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 06:04:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.43.229 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 06:04:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1355060892204-5767785.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C412F6.7040300@sdf.org> <201212090526.26535.lumiwa@gmail.com> <1355060892204-5767785.post@n5.nabble.com> From: Eitan Adler Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 09:04:25 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? To: Jakub Lach Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlSp4fRsIa6bZhRdvMGHt8Otmwu8ORTyY4dLwlKxWx2TY2Jk958MhdRBMFBQMb8JNftukZC Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 14:04:58 -0000 On 9 December 2012 08:48, Jakub Lach wrote: > This is good answer for end users, not so much when > somebody is genuinely concerned if there were some > unforeseen issues. Agreed. Companies need predictability. FWIW: The ports tree is open now (ports branch was tagged). The 9.1.0 src branch was tagged already. I'd expect to be released *very* shortly (before Christmas), although I don't know an exact date. -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 14:42:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC23F55 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 14:42:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [87.251.56.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FA0D8FC0C for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 14:42:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:1087:8fb7:11b9:397a] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:1087:8fb7:11b9:397a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A72D25C37; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 15:42:11 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 15:42:09 +0100 From: Dimitry Andric Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:18.0) Gecko/20121128 Thunderbird/18.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> In-Reply-To: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 14:42:19 -0000 On 2012-12-09 04:18, Brett Glass wrote: > Just checking in, yet again, to ask about the status of FreeBSD > 9.1. We've been delaying construction of new servers (which we > wanted to build during the US Thanksgiving holiday) until the > release, and really want to be able to work on them over Christmas. > I understand that the release was held back by server security > issues and possibly by problems with CLANG's failure to emulate > obscure quirks of GCC; It has nothing to do with clang; it is not the default compiler for 9.1, and will never be for the 9.x series. Using it to compile your system (or ports) is entirely optional. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 15:47:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2CBD28 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 15:47:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDFF8FC15 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 15:47:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Thj5p-00074d-4a for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 07:47:01 -0800 Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 07:47:01 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1355068021135-5767808.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <176051353355653@web21f.yandex.ru> <50B3E8A6.7060004@ose.nl> <50B46F5D.1040100@netfence.it> <50B471F1.5040704@ose.nl> <1354015603346-5764584.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354271955297-5765495.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354912564145-5767462.post@n5.nabble.com> <50C25B8F.2010605@ose.nl> Subject: Re: Help review the FAQ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 15:47:02 -0000 #sound-card-support=20 First part is fine, assuming man pages will be up to date etc. Not sure about support for MIDI cards/MPU-401. Is this covered by uart? Don't know whateve= r=20 was "Microsoft=C2=AE Sound System specification". #es1370-silent-pcm=20 That's one thing, but most often silent device is caused by need for proper= =20 device.hints, as usual with e.g. snd_hda. This could use mention of it. #java=20 is fine assuming linked content is up to date. Looks it is, but I'm not using Java. #midi-sound-files=20 I'm not usually creating wavs from midi (honestly, probably nobody is doing= =20 that for music listening any more, maybe it should be swapped to "how to ri= p CD to mp3 or ogg"=20 with links to port tools, but maybe this is already old fashioned ;) ) but = I have audio/timidity++=20 installed, and just checked, it still works as described. On the side note, audio/timidity is broken,=20 sound is severely corrupted, this was not the case some time ago. #x-3d-acceleration=20 This should/could be updated a bit, especially that there is no mention of intel and newer cards,=20 and those old ones (matrox etc.) are going to be dropped with newer xorg (kib@?) -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-rev= iew-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5767808.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 16:03:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3597FE3 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 16:03:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2F68FC12 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 16:03:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ThjLL-0008OH-51 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 08:03:03 -0800 Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 08:03:03 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1355068983136-5767809.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1355068021135-5767808.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <50B3E8A6.7060004@ose.nl> <50B46F5D.1040100@netfence.it> <50B471F1.5040704@ose.nl> <1354015603346-5764584.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354271955297-5765495.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354912564145-5767462.post@n5.nabble.com> <50C25B8F.2010605@ose.nl> <1355068021135-5767808.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Help review the FAQ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 16:03:03 -0000 Just FYI, "Microsoft Sound System Specification" probably was meant to be Windows Sound System (?), severely obsolete standard... "WSS was based on Analog Devices AD1848 codec chip with Yamaha OPL3 (YMF262-M) FM synthesis sound chip." Probably already axed, it was supported by dev/sound/isa/mss.c and isa/snd/ad1848.c I think. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5767809.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 16:08:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835FD1A6 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 16:08:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59CA98FC12 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 16:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ThjQZ-0000H4-V5 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 08:08:27 -0800 Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 08:08:27 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1355069307955-5767810.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1355068983136-5767809.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <50B3E8A6.7060004@ose.nl> <50B46F5D.1040100@netfence.it> <50B471F1.5040704@ose.nl> <1354015603346-5764584.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354271955297-5765495.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354912564145-5767462.post@n5.nabble.com> <50C25B8F.2010605@ose.nl> <1355068021135-5767808.post@n5.nabble.com> <1355068983136-5767809.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Help review the FAQ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 16:08:28 -0000 Closest now would be ancient snd_ad1816, maybe it could be usable with it but it's pure speculation, good luck with finding hardware and testing that :) -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5767810.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 16:19:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2326B516 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 16:19:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com (mail-la0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 802BF8FC13 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 16:19:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id j13so1799344lah.13 for ; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 08:19:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=PrC9HJP0J1G5zzpn6fGik2LLCFpswj1JZnhqsSPC7N0=; b=CxLxo7OkaNX2Pf94C/u1gdaqgiS1Ut6mUktZv9HC5b/pyCkFhr+ZaEmoOd+FZvvcID Uv2lJiXQ/0MrFbHutCXG3IGDFnVj2p5sMMr2CJLGsSJJgV/YH0U7VuGpj9gzocK14VCc PwjkufHMOvN4s8b1a00R05zsiCRD+FbNicT2bVY5sGkqOZ/I3F3y7KzbGVKElpHoQV9r UVQdsvgc1y0K++EhTnX4qWNgjeMZ6Xxo1LqC9V7biYJVINGVK18HsKqsLFMpAAjinYw8 o2ygQ5cE8z4NlwD3yfm7jq/uYL9KZBflvqhE4b3phZ7SRAhZ4Om8jnJVghDei74t1tOo OTDQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.105.103 with SMTP id gl7mr11033958lab.10.1355069977981; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 08:19:37 -0800 (PST) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.12.226 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 08:19:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1355069307955-5767810.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <50B3E8A6.7060004@ose.nl> <50B46F5D.1040100@netfence.it> <50B471F1.5040704@ose.nl> <1354015603346-5764584.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354271955297-5765495.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354912564145-5767462.post@n5.nabble.com> <50C25B8F.2010605@ose.nl> <1355068021135-5767808.post@n5.nabble.com> <1355068983136-5767809.post@n5.nabble.com> <1355069307955-5767810.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 17:19:37 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: mzVsBvUQes_PBTtb__uxb2z3SEc Message-ID: Subject: Re: Help review the FAQ From: CeDeROM To: Jakub Lach Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 16:19:40 -0000 AdLib ROX! :-) http://www.datasheetarchive.com/indexer.php?file=DSA00355987.pdf&dir=Datasheet-020&keywords=AD1848%2F1846&database=user-highscore# http://www.ebay.com/itm/Analog-Devices-AD1848KP-ISA-SoundPort-Opti-82C29A-/200846434225?pt=US_Sound_Cards_Internal_&hash=item2ec3615fb1 At computer demoscene there are still guys that use this stuff to create muzik :-) http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=adlib Best regards :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 16:37:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3BA7FC for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 16:37:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D6B8FC13 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 16:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Thjsf-0007Zy-07 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 17:37:29 +0100 Received: from 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 17:37:28 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 17:37:28 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: jb Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 16:37:01 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121121 Firefox/10.0.11) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 16:37:20 -0000 Brett Glass lariat.net> writes: > > Just checking in, yet again, to ask about the status of FreeBSD > 9.1. We've been delaying construction of new servers (which we > wanted to build during the US Thanksgiving holiday) until the > release, and really want to be able to work on them over Christmas. > I understand that the release was held back by server security > issues and possibly by problems with CLANG's failure to emulate > obscure quirks of GCC; are these now resolved? Is there anything > else on the "TODO" list (the version on the Wiki is of no help; > it's woefully out of date) to be done prior to release? Does the > FreeBSD project need a fresh server to be donated to handle the release? > > --Brett Glass A few days ago I installed 9.0 and tested twice: - updating security/errata - updating ports tree with portsnap - setting up the system for Linux, Java, browsers (as in Handbook) - and then from ports to make work the usual suspects: cdrecord, smartmontools It all seems to be OK until, after many subsequent ports tree updates, I decided to update xterm, vlc, xfce, pan from ports. If I managed to update some of them, then it seemed the dependencies hell or something else started to take effect and I could not finish building them because they were dying with errors. I have done such an exercise in the past many times and I never failed to bring my system to a stable state. Only after this security compromise, time wise, things were so unstable. I understand that releng people will build all packages once more right before 9.1 release, but perhaps caution is warranted - would 9.1-RC4 make sense ? jb From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 16:42:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA9EA5B for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 16:42:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C6A8FC14 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 16:42:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qB9Gg0oB015052 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 10:42:01 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <50C4BF57.9020009@tundraware.com> Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 10:41:59 -0600 From: Tim Daneliuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (ozzie.tundraware.com [192.168.0.1]); Sun, 09 Dec 2012 10:42:01 -0600 (CST) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: qB9Gg0oB015052 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 16:42:18 -0000 On 12/09/2012 10:37 AM, jb wrote: > I understand that releng people will build all packages once more right before > 9.1 release, but perhaps caution is warranted - would 9.1-RC4 make sense ? I recently upgraded in place from 8.3-STABLE to 9.1-PRE. I needed to redo the system because of the sec compromise "just to be sure", so this seemed to be a good time to do it. So, using the now-preferred portsnap and svn download mechanisms, I rebuilt the OS AND every single port. Thus far, I've not had a significant problem ... well, other than the fact that when sasl rebuilds it does not restart the daemon and I couldn't figure out why mail wasn't going out ... -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 16:43:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61445B63 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 16:43:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5098FC0C for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 16:43:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id go10so1890933lbb.13 for ; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 08:43:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=laWopQQgC1jl7FYDUhM8AbEw00KJbMzbBRla51VZ3Ac=; b=LLdiJR2fUKFuWU9BXIoCl9FnxzQa+aZoJZ3o3iV1k8ldCOMdhVdBqaDB6Ddefyb/Ts GddMsVPGZgko7S8GoTX/LXtWZ5aAQea44AEgw+XlOusYP7OrrmB8el8rptmKLtCYl6rP l05/bMSLV7zG2KIzMz406JEkMiFINtj4WaboXYMiD9YOVj4S9YvXLxGmL0QYGCT3xz7P w71H0BUwFl2RWPb1yXiONYBBZKYve1feOkcTjShsXa5blmkyUB1ojJMv13jjd+gbGYwV rdojW0D3pSRi8Pl4ehT+QL3NqgtkCMSJTHDcnikKDDPiYDAUeI9//SoNGuL7x5IxzGJK 0ORg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.104.240 with SMTP id gh16mr11365635lab.56.1355071418423; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 08:43:38 -0800 (PST) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.12.226 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 08:43:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 17:43:38 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Jva7uLSfkFBsFFbZ35lx9AgwRV4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? From: CeDeROM To: jb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 16:43:45 -0000 On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 5:37 PM, jb wrote: > A few days ago I installed 9.0 and tested twice: > (..) > Only after this security compromise, time wise, things were so unstable. > I understand that releng people will build all packages once more right before > 9.1 release, but perhaps caution is warranted - would 9.1-RC4 make sense ? Was also true for me to crash the 9.0 system with dependencies inconsistency after some time. But! Try 9.1-RC3 and use PORTINSTALL (ports-mgmt/portupgrade port) - see how beautiful life become when you only type what program you wand and it gets installed from BINARY PACKAGES with all necessary dependencies :-) So far I have no problem at all with portinstall on two machines running 9.1-RC3 for some weeks. PORTINSTALL should become a standard equipment of FreeBSD :-) Best regards :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 17:08:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9F423B for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 17:08:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2EC8FC12 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 17:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ThkMq-0001HL-O8 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 18:08:44 +0100 Received: from 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 18:08:40 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 18:08:40 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: jb Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 17:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121121 Firefox/10.0.11) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 17:08:42 -0000 CeDeROM tlen.pl> writes: > ... > Was also true for me to crash the 9.0 system with dependencies > inconsistency after some time. But! Try 9.1-RC3 and use PORTINSTALL > ... The reason I abandoned 9.1-RC? was the security update statement that "It is believed that the compromise may have occurred as early as the 19th September 2012." I looked at 9.1 release schedule and saw this: Action Expected Actual RC1 2012-07-20 2012-08-23 RC2 2012-09-07 2012-10-09 ... and decided to drop the ball, go back to 9.0 and bring myself up from there. The result was as described. jb From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 19:44:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE64B340 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 19:44:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bright@mu.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA528FC08 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 19:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.242.246.239] (221.sub-174-234-14.myvzw.com [174.234.14.221]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93A731A3CF7; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 11:44:34 -0800 (PST) References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C412F6.7040300@sdf.org> <201212090526.26535.lumiwa@gmail.com> <1355060892204-5767785.post@n5.nabble.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <59932B96-F041-4BC2-9DD6-598A531A7F0D@mu.org> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10A523) From: Alfred Perlstein Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 11:44:32 -0800 To: Eitan Adler Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" , Jakub Lach X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 19:44:36 -0000 My prediction is 9.1 will be released the last day of Hanukkah and I will te= ll you why: When I was a kid sometimes I would ask my patients to give me one big gift f= or Hanukkah instead of a small present each day. This would mean I would hav= e to wait until the final day though.=20 My assumption is that my Jewish mother has told re@ & core@ of this preferen= ce and they are just setting up to surprise the members of the tribe with on= e big gift.=20 So everyone please hold onto your dreidels! Sent from my iPhone On Dec 9, 2012, at 6:04 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 9 December 2012 08:48, Jakub Lach wrote: >> This is good answer for end users, not so much when >> somebody is genuinely concerned if there were some >> unforeseen issues. >=20 > Agreed. Companies need predictability. >=20 > FWIW: The ports tree is open now (ports branch was tagged). The 9.1.0 > src branch was tagged already. I'd expect to be released *very* > shortly (before Christmas), although I don't know an exact date. >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Eitan Adler > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 20:31:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0560205; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 20:31:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288248FC16; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 20:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Toshi.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2] (may be forged)) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA17017; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 13:31:07 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:31:04 -0700 To: Dimitry Andric From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? In-Reply-To: <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 20:31:16 -0000 At 07:42 AM 12/9/2012, Dimitry Andric wrote: >It has nothing to do with clang; it is not the default compiler for 9.1, >and will never be for the 9.x series. Using it to compile your system >(or ports) is entirely optional. I am actually eagerly awaiting a completely "un-GNUed" toolchain. But I am glad that this is not the holdup. I just need to plan my time so that I get a vacation SOMETIME this season and also keep my commitments. Alas, there have been no updates to the projected schedule or to the "To Do" list to help me out. --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 20:59:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF65762; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 20:59:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79448FC14; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 20:59:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hm9so719136wib.13 for ; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 12:59:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=8yo+H+QqNmEf4novj2BkWBHyoTqaYKWVBqKXhpQtDmM=; b=GFhDcV2C6FAQ3kTgRG+v+xOf2I4+HGWTY/Gn5NwFeAb9NS8XCI55Zam8MKD90qVFFI +LDCutnSh58L4E+mx3oASDW9r7szmag1sJFd9FNAtJutDHVKeaDhY7NOsdJnyIv9ya4U ADQUWQU03SQ0SaA+3d8PGYK5dPzxPvkJJvsKO1VHQFz08iy+BD6Qhz4ozK8p+PXJozbQ 3GBdrsbzQK0tCeo9G461QG3cR/6gufnPqh6/x6VbzxjmA5teF1RfA34oi1nIClDeZyVZ ByWRioeHyKSZLeXb2YLnNQhdOg7ZGOobwDCFQ70s8HAKu/5ANrdPHmrGohTKF14yZc8b BODw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.200.160 with SMTP id z32mr4266264wen.53.1355086771535; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 12:59:31 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.217.57.9 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 12:59:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 12:59:31 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: L8HEb5NbcAB81Bmwi32bxqSdutM Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? From: Adrian Chadd To: Brett Glass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 20:59:33 -0000 .. if people would like to see more resources thrown at getting things like timely releases done, please consider donating to the FreeBSD foundation and write to them about what you'd like to see. I think people are really quite used to getting "something for nothing". This isn't an attack at you Brett; this is more of a general observation. Adrian From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 21:11:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DE5913 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 21:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD3D8FC12 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 21:11:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tho9u-0005hM-CF for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 22:11:34 +0100 Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.21.186.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 22:11:34 +0100 Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 22:11:34 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Walter Hurry Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 21:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 30dc37b master) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 21:11:26 -0000 On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 12:59:31 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > .. if people would like to see more resources thrown at getting things > like timely releases done, please consider donating to the FreeBSD > foundation and write to them about what you'd like to see. > > I think people are really quite used to getting "something for nothing". > > This isn't an attack at you Brett; this is more of a general > observation. > Well said, Sir. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 22:15:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B50BCF; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 22:15:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493E18FC14; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 22:15:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Toshi.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2] (may be forged)) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA17770; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 15:15:39 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 15:15:39 -0700 To: Adrian Chadd From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? In-Reply-To: References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 22:15:43 -0000 At 01:59 PM 12/9/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: >.. if people would like to see more resources thrown at getting things >like timely releases done, please consider donating to the FreeBSD >foundation and write to them about what you'd like to see. > >I think people are really quite used to getting "something for nothing". > >This isn't an attack at you Brett; this is more of a general observation. I hope it's not. In my previous message, I offered to donate a server. Along with some bandwidth, if that's useful. --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 22:41:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91FF7283; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 22:41:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFAF78FC15; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 22:41:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id u54so1205162wey.13 for ; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 14:41:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4AY1AaOWI4TjY4Xev449N7z6nK/8lxOP194a1Hng84E=; b=iPk30KuGsmO6RQTCZ6NhBvN9Cj1pNOo4yu0RIFhAtBHF5xoOp4yGoi+OVbgPj1ysY0 wqtIg26mpH65vYgHgSVCsUnkuI96sSntbXybmY0rY2/URhL77bRvWtKVKqbC0whLPC7q HPvCY1fKgKeur5DWp6PXsYYhZrGPcm0c6YgzJEgqmFtUIv31OuEclmDeQS0rVkNtBxkW vUmXQ7lqhYQadgNksS3F2TNpnVR5c2hXVX8Hb2AyhzEibfHYM4RsBMjKjFV0//lcOec/ qcRmrJkwGAMLRSXskauekM68PFUNLgXYrOBZic67s3lSry8UKE1jsJbAJ3udggQYQp4d 9HrQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.78.1 with SMTP id x1mr7787991wiw.17.1355092897980; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 14:41:37 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.217.57.9 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 14:41:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 14:41:37 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3Due2Q01gWja7KfwXCMrh-B_2OI Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? From: Adrian Chadd To: Brett Glass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 22:41:39 -0000 Hi, It's definitely not targeted at you. The 9.1 stuff is an intersection of: * personal issues with some of the people involved (ie, "real life got to them and that took precedence"); * the security incident; * the freebsd cluster shuffling and reshuffling that was going on at the same time >From my understanding there's enough hardware. Definitely not a hardware specific problem. The foundation funds and provides plenty of hardware, as well as yahoo and a few other companies. I don't think we're short of i386/amd64 hardware. It's honestly just an intersection of bad timing. Since it's a volunteer project, it's on the timelines of the volunteers in question. I think people are right though when they comment on the lack of communication from the project about this. See the list of things above to understand why communication may not have been terribly great. :-) I'll amend my "stuff that will help" list: * Donate to the freebsd foundation, along with opening discussions to them about how your organisation uses / relies upon freebsd; * Volunteer to join the release engineering / package building teams, and actively donate manpower to the project. Adrian From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 23:04:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3447E0E; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 23:04:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157ED8FC12; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 23:04:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id fo14so2532183vcb.13 for ; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 15:04:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=oBMhfo7lVAVFVTFvS8BHVrV1a+XVZvVdGSoedJOMYuA=; b=e12vciN2e7vUH6OSp2zHpuih9o1/KozWk0/S1zxhVvsYJgWyEg5PBi9sUJcn3Ugejz i8dMpEJrmGgHlPK2ELO7omndZyso2RgyqoC7D/Cz1zAU/uNnsXRqaUABpIbgxmZzKuWl FZweOOfPSxOiplr3eC37Rk6cjvvsT5bfXlduStSaQcRenDXtyRESuHXF1GflV7gXhRZD yt4NF876cPdrGgoeCCQXgO+mq6Mqu4gG/PCNIS5t3HakjnRFmgMZgEbpk4a8UNhWhJOG bs4yQMfSduvM+QxtP27ecI1nwiMtDba2pyJRrD4waG1YEiEoEk9TqWeUrpL09fb9uNBy JHkw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.75.100 with SMTP id b4mr6845618vdw.52.1355094267154; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 15:04:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.218.35 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 15:04:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 15:04:26 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Brett Glass , stable@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 23:04:28 -0000 On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi, > > It's definitely not targeted at you. The 9.1 stuff is an intersection of: > > * personal issues with some of the people involved (ie, "real life got > to them and that took precedence"); > * the security incident; > * the freebsd cluster shuffling and reshuffling that was going on at > the same time > > From my understanding there's enough hardware. Definitely not a > hardware specific problem. The foundation funds and provides plenty of > hardware, as well as yahoo and a few other companies. I don't think > we're short of i386/amd64 hardware. > > It's honestly just an intersection of bad timing. Since it's a > volunteer project, it's on the timelines of the volunteers in > question. > > I think people are right though when they comment on the lack of > communication from the project about this. See the list of things > above to understand why communication may not have been terribly > great. :-) > > I'll amend my "stuff that will help" list: > > * Donate to the freebsd foundation, along with opening discussions to > them about how your organisation uses / relies upon freebsd; > * Volunteer to join the release engineering / package building teams, > and actively donate manpower to the project. > > > > Adrian > _______________________________________________ > > http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/donate/ http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/announcements.shtml#fundraising Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 23:14:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CE6FC2 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 23:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578FD8FC12 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 23:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBD2F2.dip.t-dialin.net [93.203.210.242]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qB9NERm0077292; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:14:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qB9NEQgc010748; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:14:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qB9NEDmU050541; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:14:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201212092314.qB9NEDmU050541@fire.js.berklix.net> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:31:04 MST." <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:14:13 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: Brett Glass X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 23:14:36 -0000 Brett Glass wrote: > At 07:42 AM 12/9/2012, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > >It has nothing to do with clang; it is not the default compiler for 9.1, > >and will never be for the 9.x series. Using it to compile your system > >(or ports) is entirely optional. > > I am actually eagerly awaiting a completely "un-GNUed" toolchain. But I am > glad that this is not the holdup. I just need to plan my time so that I get > a vacation SOMETIME this season and also keep my commitments. Alas, there > have been no updates to the projected schedule or to the "To Do" list to > help me out. > > --Brett Glass Hi those eagerly awaiting, Re-read Eitan's post of Sun, 9 Dec 2012 09:04:25 -0500 (15:04 CET) Those with knowledge, time & enthusiasm can already build their own 9.1-RELEASE from released public sources. No longer need to wait. As I wrote 3 local friends Fri, 07 Dec 2012 08:37:20 +0100 ] In case you'r waiting to upgrade any production servers to latest release: ] { ] Although FreeBSD-9.1-RELEASE has not been announced yet, it's available: ] in (ctm distributed) CVS tree (I admit I havent converted to use svn yet) ] grep RELENG_9_1_0_RELEASE /pub/FreeBSD/development/FreeBSD-CVS/src/Makefile,v ] I am exporting with ] cvs -R export -r RELENG_9_1_0_RELEASE src # du=867 M tgz=149 M ] ports & doc have not been tagged yet, they will later be: ] cvs -R export -r RELEASE_9_1_0 ports # du=... M tgz=... M ] cvs -R export -r RELEASE_9_1_0 doc ] ] The .iso images are not in ftp.freebsd.org or eg ftp2.de.freebsd.org yet, ] (& I havent bothered to look for packages as I dont use them, I always ] compile my own ports) ] I assume the delay to announce release is 'cos they're still recovering ] from their security intrusion & still rebuilding packages after ] http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html ] ] freebsd.org also have sigbus issues with cvsup (affecting send-pr), ] may also be slowing build cluster ] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2012-December/041352.html Clue to a quick check with CVS is/was grep RELENG_9_1_0_RELEASE /usr/cvs/src/Makefile,v grep RELEASE_9_1_0 /usr/cvs/ports/Makefile,v but as CVS is about to disappear, what's a quick check for svn ? Compliments to re@ team who have doubtless been working very hard, probably on a problematic cluster base. Hopefully there'll be less "When ?" questions that might distract re@, now people realise it's tagged & you can build yourself if you're in a rush. ports/ is also tagged & available: From: Thomas Abthorpe Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 19:59:09 +0000 To: ports@freebsd.org (though no tag for that yet in preceeding cvs-cur 19073 ) Those who want this lot must wait till announcement (a few days I guess) binaries compiled at freebsd.org + for all architectures, + packages build on freebsd.org cluster + docs + iso's built + all ftp'd from master server to mirror servers globaly + Release Notes written by re@ team who are doubtless tired, & working flat out ;-) + all of that work to be done on a freebsd cluster that was compromised & needed to be checked before the relase rolled, Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". Send plain text. Not: HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 09:39:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8B0889; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:39:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@psconsult.nl) Received: from mx1.psconsult.nl (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:30f:e0::5059:ee8a]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EAC58FC21; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:39:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.psconsult.nl (mx1.hvnu.psconsult.nl [46.44.189.154]) by mx1.psconsult.nl (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBA9dVYu077161 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:39:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@psconsult.nl) Received: (from paul@localhost) by mx1.psconsult.nl (8.14.5/8.14.4/Submit) id qBA9dV3m077160; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:39:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@psconsult.nl) X-Authentication-Warning: mx1.psconsult.nl: paul set sender to freebsd@psconsult.nl using -f Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:39:31 +0100 From: Paul Schenkeveld To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? Message-ID: <20121210093931.GA76623@psconsult.nl> References: <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> <201212092314.qB9NEDmU050541@fire.js.berklix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201212092314.qB9NEDmU050541@fire.js.berklix.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:39:38 -0000 On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:14:13AM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Clue to a quick check with CVS is/was > grep RELENG_9_1_0_RELEASE /usr/cvs/src/Makefile,v > grep RELEASE_9_1_0 /usr/cvs/ports/Makefile,v > but as CVS is about to disappear, what's a quick check for svn ? Some time before the turn of the millennium I wrote this little script that updates a local list of FreeBSD/sendmail/bind versions every night. I recently adapted it for svn. It's just a hack but works for me, use it as you please: http://www.psconsult.nl/pub/FB/fb_releases It expects the svn repository to be file:///FreeBSD/svn/base and writes a file called /FreeBSD/rel. Kind regards, Paul Schenkeveld From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 11:16:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6F0BE2 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:16:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ptyll@nitronet.pl) Received: from mail.nitronet.pl (smtp.nitronet.pl [195.90.106.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9FA8FC14 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:16:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailnull by mail.nitronet.pl with virscan (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti111-0005c7-EB for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:55:15 +0100 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:54:55 +0100 From: Pawel Tyll X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <14710710481.20121210115455@nitronet.pl> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ptyll@nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.nitronet.pl); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:16:38 -0000 Hi list, After an upgrade from 8.3 to 9.1-STABLE, this machine started crashing. It's a GENERIC kernel with following changes: options DUMMYNET options IPFIREWALL options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT options HZ=1000 options IPSTEALTH options IPFIREWALL_NAT options LIBALIAS options ROUTETABLES=16 Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 3; apic id = 03 fault virtual address = 0x0 fault code = supervisor read data, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff80956c73 stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffff82ddbe3750 frame pointer = 0x28:0xffffff82ddbe3760 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 Any ideas what might be wrong? p. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 11:38:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32481485 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:38:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=1691171a9b=killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34C48FC13 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:38:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r2d2 ([188.220.16.49]) by mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon PRO v10.0.4) with ESMTP id md50001302115.msg for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:38:26 +0000 X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:38:26 +0000 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 188.220.16.49 X-Return-Path: prvs=1691171a9b=killing@multiplay.co.uk X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <25C40A89BB7841C5A48906BB8243E2E7@multiplay.co.uk> From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Pawel Tyll" , References: <14710710481.20121210115455@nitronet.pl> Subject: Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:38:44 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:38:34 -0000 1. Do you have a full crash dump? 2. Are world and kernel in sync? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pawel Tyll" To: Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 10:54 AM Subject: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. > Hi list, > > After an upgrade from 8.3 to 9.1-STABLE, this machine started > crashing. > > It's a GENERIC kernel with following changes: > > options DUMMYNET > options IPFIREWALL > options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD > options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT > options HZ=1000 > > options IPSTEALTH > > options IPFIREWALL_NAT > options LIBALIAS > options ROUTETABLES=16 > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 3; apic id = 03 > fault virtual address = 0x0 > fault code = supervisor read data, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff80956c73 > stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffff82ddbe3750 > frame pointer = 0x28:0xffffff82ddbe3760 > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 > processor eflags = > interrupt enabled, > resume, IOPL = 0 > > Any ideas what might be wrong? > > p. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 12:14:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1105F2 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:14:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ptyll@nitronet.pl) Received: from mail.nitronet.pl (smtp.nitronet.pl [195.90.106.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8248FC13 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailnull by mail.nitronet.pl with virscan (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti2FD-0007X2-Bp for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:13:59 +0100 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:13:39 +0100 From: Pawel Tyll X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <111851865.20121210131339@nitronet.pl> To: "Steven Hartland" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. In-Reply-To: <25C40A89BB7841C5A48906BB8243E2E7@multiplay.co.uk> References: <14710710481.20121210115455@nitronet.pl> <25C40A89BB7841C5A48906BB8243E2E7@multiplay.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ptyll@nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.nitronet.pl); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:14:02 -0000 Hi, > 1. Do you have a full crash dump? Unfortunately no. This is everything that got logged. > 2. Are world and kernel in sync? I believe so. Is there a fool-proof reliable way to check this? It's crashing frequently, so I can make changes to get things logged properly, if given pointers. p. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 12:20:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734899C8 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:20:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6F78FC0C for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id go10so2517190lbb.13 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 04:20:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jOkmiw9U3IFyQXV9Bvw/lrjJHTWFwfzo1hPg56+TLMU=; b=EKCGbx5JeeBiLlKxC8zr8LtEpd3GpIHm8wCvMUOYYJZwNmeQkjvD8X2zgzf/DN/gs6 qCir3LGngFD70UtSPo7LHRRE0khrSw7+7yigRPoW4ticnw3oxrXPq+WIcf7RfXWKcR1Y 2mKyeyf1k7oV6TmR2cuFuNYFJHybYRUpHSurBbKShAANfp66wRS/g/udmyLtgfZJ8kZN z6rewRok6tGmqUy/cYgyGYXRFHyiZYmZSfM5te92MNGsHBuw88PkPN+4EaK8OVVmhZUG E8pQ9LQVYkZTo2/ME80TXm49RgY5uGCuuJKNBIajixmuCtjWo6MFSRXvMOeginttKp+f avwA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.44.2 with SMTP id a2mr6050158lbm.131.1355142007684; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 04:20:07 -0800 (PST) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.12.226 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 04:20:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.12.226 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 04:20:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <111851865.20121210131339@nitronet.pl> References: <14710710481.20121210115455@nitronet.pl> <25C40A89BB7841C5A48906BB8243E2E7@multiplay.co.uk> <111851865.20121210131339@nitronet.pl> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:20:07 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: r-O8vnYNvma5M9gOoa6cgyyWhV8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. From: CeDeROM To: Pawel Tyll Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Steven Hartland , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:20:09 -0000 Hey Pawel, please force fsck of the filesystem (-f), I had that issue recently and the system was crashing because of that (su-journal did not show fs corruption). Fsck -f showed and fixed inconsistencies and now its fine. Best regards, Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 12:29:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BC9C4F for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:29:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ptyll@nitronet.pl) Received: from mail.nitronet.pl (smtp.nitronet.pl [195.90.106.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B3A8FC0C for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:29:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailnull by mail.nitronet.pl with virscan (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti2Tm-0007qV-8F for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:29:02 +0100 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:28:42 +0100 From: Pawel Tyll X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <669906304.20121210132842@nitronet.pl> To: CeDeROM Subject: Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. In-Reply-To: References: <14710710481.20121210115455@nitronet.pl> <25C40A89BB7841C5A48906BB8243E2E7@multiplay.co.uk> <111851865.20121210131339@nitronet.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ptyll@nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.nitronet.pl); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Steven Hartland X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:29:03 -0000 Hi, > Hey Pawel, please force fsck of the filesystem (-f), I had that issue > recently and the system was crashing because of that (su-journal did not > show fs corruption). Fsck -f showed and fixed inconsistencies and now its > fine. This is a ZFS-only machine, including root. There are no UFS filesystems mounted. p. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 12:30:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34F0DBC for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BEB28FC14 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:30:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 759A86A6008; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:30:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBACU2p9047545; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:30:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qBACU2iu046323; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:30:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:30:02 +0100 From: Lars Engels To: Jakub Lach Subject: Re: Help review the FAQ Message-ID: <20121210123002.GR69108@e-new.0x20.net> References: <50B3E8A6.7060004@ose.nl> <50B46F5D.1040100@netfence.it> <50B471F1.5040704@ose.nl> <1354015603346-5764584.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354271955297-5765495.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354912564145-5767462.post@n5.nabble.com> <50C25B8F.2010605@ose.nl> <1355068021135-5767808.post@n5.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0fu5tullpC+tJp0Y" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1355068021135-5767808.post@n5.nabble.com> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p4 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:30:03 -0000 --0fu5tullpC+tJp0Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 07:47:01AM -0800, Jakub Lach wrote: > #sound-card-support=20 >=20 > First part is fine, assuming man pages will be up to date etc. Not sure > about > support for MIDI cards/MPU-401. Is this covered by uart? Don't know whate= ver=20 > was "Microsoft=C2=AE Sound System specification". >=20 > #es1370-silent-pcm=20 >=20 > That's one thing, but most often silent device is caused by need for prop= er=20 > device.hints, as usual with e.g. snd_hda. This could use mention of it. snd_hda can be configured at runtime from 9.0 on. No need for device.hints. --0fu5tullpC+tJp0Y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlDF1coACgkQKc512sD3afgKFgCgi5WsvvaQfDB7Fp32uUhk0i+H kDAAoLxKt+rFw7OnxUwqomhhHtZWUbvZ =R27z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0fu5tullpC+tJp0Y-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 12:37:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C990812D for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:37:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7854D8FC14 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:37:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.104.138]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti2bg-0003zH-Rq for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:37:13 +0100 Received: from [81.21.138.17] (helo=ronaldradial.versatec.local) by smtp.greenhost.nl with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti2bg-0000VF-LL for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:37:12 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. References: <14710710481.20121210115455@nitronet.pl> <25C40A89BB7841C5A48906BB8243E2E7@multiplay.co.uk> <111851865.20121210131339@nitronet.pl> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:37:12 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <111851865.20121210131339@nitronet.pl> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.11 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net X-Spam-Level: / X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Scan-Signature: 964c6a2bc69af72888bec91466701c23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:37:21 -0000 On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:13:39 +0100, Pawel Tyll wrote: > Hi, > >> 1. Do you have a full crash dump? > Unfortunately no. This is everything that got logged. > >> 2. Are world and kernel in sync? > I believe so. Is there a fool-proof reliable way to check this? > > It's crashing frequently, so I can make changes to get things logged > properly, if given pointers. Setup the machine to save crash dumps after a crash. If you have that you can extract information from it which will help developers to analyze the issue. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html#kerneldebug-obtain Ronald. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 12:50:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF48B70D for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:50:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=1691171a9b=killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF1C8FC0C for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r2d2 ([188.220.16.49]) by mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon PRO v10.0.4) with ESMTP id md50001302694.msg for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:49:59 +0000 X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:49:59 +0000 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 188.220.16.49 X-Return-Path: prvs=1691171a9b=killing@multiplay.co.uk X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <0E1DD49A33CB410F89DC2A53C845715C@multiplay.co.uk> From: "Steven Hartland" To: , "Ronald Klop" References: <14710710481.20121210115455@nitronet.pl> <25C40A89BB7841C5A48906BB8243E2E7@multiplay.co.uk> <111851865.20121210131339@nitronet.pl> Subject: Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:50:17 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:50:02 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ronald Klop" To: Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 12:37 PM Subject: Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. > On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:13:39 +0100, Pawel Tyll wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> 1. Do you have a full crash dump? >> Unfortunately no. This is everything that got logged. >> >>> 2. Are world and kernel in sync? >> I believe so. Is there a fool-proof reliable way to check this? >> >> It's crashing frequently, so I can make changes to get things logged >> properly, if given pointers. > > Setup the machine to save crash dumps after a crash. If you have that you > can extract information from it which will help developers to analyze the > issue. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html#kerneldebug-obtain If you have swap on a raw disk then adding the following to /etc/rc.conf is usually sufficent dumpdev="AUTO" If you don't reboot then run: /etc/rc.d/dumpon start Regards Steve ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 12:51:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52525836 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shiv.nath@digital-infotech.net) Received: from mail.digital-infotech.net (mail.digital-infotech.net [41.211.25.193]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED598FC13 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digital-infotech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5342E4107; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:51:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.digital-infotech.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.digital-infotech.net [127.0.0.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62793-08; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:51:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.digital-infotech.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digital-infotech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C2E2E4101; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:51:13 +0000 (GMT) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.0 mail.digital-infotech.net 16C2E2E4101 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=digital-infotech.net; s=digital; t=1355143873; bh=nTsmUkABl0YqpOTI9xG9jJxZWEaBjwGi9z61W+n1z2c=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Reply-To; b=DrYrBcgXc+mfH68j2PLwoIsZUyOinJ8LUqLcx/9G5ITyeS0PHE4BVifg9JHzM7gzR M3b8lwiHibE+wklFuveyHc6u8d2YVYmRJawSTzuaDvhFx342fi/zMdnKzJCZ7Ux1Mm bQHPoXBWKXfQiiy3rkoC2Kt6gj9a4aMWJAtwZLno= Received: from 41.211.27.79 (SquirrelMail authenticated user prabhpal@digital-infotech.net) by mail.digital-infotech.net with HTTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:51:13 -0000 Message-ID: <611303664348ecbdc98eafe2798eac8b.squirrel@mail.digital-infotech.net> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:51:13 -0000 Subject: WiFi / Hot-Spot Open Source World From: "Shiv. Nath" To: debian-user@lists.debian.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, centos@centos.org, freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: shiv.nath@digital-infotech.net List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:51:22 -0000 Dear Experts i am sure many of you would be the part of the real game, where lot of technology is implemented (Internet Service Providers) those serve thousands of clients everyday . i am requesting opinion & advice from those experts. Surfing web does not help much unless someone who is practically touch and making the use of the technology everyday. And i could not find the best place than this where i can ask this question & where my request can reach highly technical peoples those know the information i need. Your advice is valuable, i wish to thanks in advance to those guys would spend their imp time to discuss or respond to this matter. The topic is WiFi / Hot-Spot reliable solution in open source world. I work with ISP offering service for hotspots and cafe clubs. initially company was using hosted service to authenticate / validate hotspot-cafe users etc for many years. Eventually, our management decided to purchased a solution that can be one time investment and serve the need for our clients. 24-Online is a wifi & hotspot solution comes in form of appliance. We purchased 24-Online appliance that costed more than $40,000. We purchased by thinking that it is commercial product and it would be reliable and considered support as well, anyways. After started using the solution, we released that is not reliable AT ALL. Almost everyday appliance has problems. sometimes it does not issue ip address (DHCP) to hotspot client, if that happens, it does not redirect to portal page so that a user can fill voucher number and start browsing. in short, everyday this & that. As said, we have purchased the commercial support as well but support guys take several hours sometime whole weekend to troubleshoot the problem. in result our customers are down. we have refund and call for apologies for the service interruption. After this one year frustration, i wish to seek advice form experts. what kind of program or what is the right approach to handle this wifi-hotspot clients using Linux/ Unix. Is there anything reliable exists that can work without everyday problem. i understand it is a technology once in a while always be some problem there but not everyday on words. There are four services those can make it work. 1.) User reached hotspot --> Switched his laptop on --> DHCP request travels to our data center using existing link to hotspot & hotspot software should issue a ip to the user (DHCP functionality). 2.) User clicked on his browser icon --> browser opens --> Request is redirected to a web server (customer portal page) where user can fill his valid voucher number he purchased form hotspot site for browsing(Apache functionality) 3.) User clicks ok after entering his voucher number --> authentication happens --> (FreeRadious functionality) 4.) Then accounting --> user can only browse for 1 hours if he purchased one hour voucher --> (FreeRadious functionality) how can i put all four service together and make stuff working. Thanks / Thanks From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 12:54:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43047982 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:54:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A98E8FC15 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:54:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti2rs-0005eh-1l for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 04:53:56 -0800 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 04:53:56 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1355144036031-5768088.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <20121210123002.GR69108@e-new.0x20.net> References: <50B3E8A6.7060004@ose.nl> <50B46F5D.1040100@netfence.it> <50B471F1.5040704@ose.nl> <1354015603346-5764584.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354271955297-5765495.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354912564145-5767462.post@n5.nabble.com> <50C25B8F.2010605@ose.nl> <1355068021135-5767808.post@n5.nabble.com> <20121210123002.GR69108@e-new.0x20.net> Subject: Re: Help review the FAQ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:54:03 -0000 Ok, but it doesn't change current primary reason of silent devices (wrong pinout) :) -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5768088.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 13:00:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C07B98 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:00:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ptyll@nitronet.pl) Received: from mail.nitronet.pl (smtp.nitronet.pl [195.90.106.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717638FC12 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailnull by mail.nitronet.pl with virscan (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti2yV-0008nI-Hm for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:00:47 +0100 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:00:27 +0100 From: Pawel Tyll X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <213032430.20121210140027@nitronet.pl> To: "Steven Hartland" Subject: Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. In-Reply-To: <0E1DD49A33CB410F89DC2A53C845715C@multiplay.co.uk> References: <14710710481.20121210115455@nitronet.pl> <25C40A89BB7841C5A48906BB8243E2E7@multiplay.co.uk> <111851865.20121210131339@nitronet.pl> <0E1DD49A33CB410F89DC2A53C845715C@multiplay.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ptyll@nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.nitronet.pl); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ronald Klop X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:00:48 -0000 Hi, > If you have swap on a raw disk then adding the following to /etc/rc.conf > is usually sufficent > dumpdev="AUTO" > If you don't reboot then run: > /etc/rc.d/dumpon start Thanks. Dumps will be done to gmirror; I switched balancing to prefer for the time being. Everything's setup, so hopefully I'll have a dump soon. p. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 13:26:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C471979B for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:26:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD7E8FC0C for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti3N2-0000iK-3T for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 05:26:08 -0800 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 05:26:08 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1355145968096-5768106.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <611303664348ecbdc98eafe2798eac8b.squirrel@mail.digital-infotech.net> References: <611303664348ecbdc98eafe2798eac8b.squirrel@mail.digital-infotech.net> Subject: Re: WiFi / Hot-Spot Open Source World MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:26:08 -0000 1) This wrong list, it should be asked on -questions or -chat, if at all. 2) Your message is too long, and looks like on the first look like nigerian scam (sorry), most people will not take time to read it whole. 3) This is not free tech support, this is list about development of open source system. 4) Despite obfuscation in wall of text, you have outlined your problem pretty well- you have bought unreliable service and / or have unreliable tech support on the site. 5) Again, this is open source, not free lunch. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/WiFi-Hot-Spot-Open-Source-World-tp5768087p5768106.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 13:28:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42DFB8D6 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:28:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ptyll@nitronet.pl) Received: from mail.nitronet.pl (smtp.nitronet.pl [195.90.106.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E613C8FC12 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailnull by mail.nitronet.pl with virscan (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti3Ot-0009RH-Rg for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:28:04 +0100 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:27:43 +0100 From: Pawel Tyll X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1196933053.20121210142743@nitronet.pl> To: "Steven Hartland" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ronald Klop Subject: Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. In-Reply-To: <213032430.20121210140027@nitronet.pl> References: <14710710481.20121210115455@nitronet.pl> <25C40A89BB7841C5A48906BB8243E2E7@multiplay.co.uk> <111851865.20121210131339@nitronet.pl> <0E1DD49A33CB410F89DC2A53C845715C@multiplay.co.uk> <213032430.20121210140027@nitronet.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ptyll@nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.nitronet.pl); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:28:06 -0000 Here's more info, including backtrace: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 3; apic id = 03 fault virtual address = 0x0 fault code = supervisor read data, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff80956c73 stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffff82ddbe3750 frame pointer = 0x28:0xffffff82ddbe3760 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 12 (irq275: em1:rx 0) trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 3 KDB: stack backtrace: #0 0xffffffff80929bb6 at kdb_backtrace+0x66 #1 0xffffffff808f3b1e at panic+0x1ce #2 0xffffffff80bfde10 at trap_fatal+0x290 #3 0xffffffff80bfe148 at trap_pfault+0x1e8 #4 0xffffffff80bfe74e at trap+0x3be #5 0xffffffff80be7f7f at calltrap+0x8 #6 0xffffffff80a7c1af at tcp_input+0x65f #7 0xffffffff80a0db0d at ip_input+0xdd #8 0xffffffff809b7288 at netisr_dispatch_src+0x218 #9 0xffffffff809ace1d at ether_demux+0x14d #10 0xffffffff809ad0f4 at ether_nh_input+0x1f4 #11 0xffffffff809b7288 at netisr_dispatch_src+0x218 #12 0xffffffff809acd3f at ether_demux+0x6f #13 0xffffffff809ad0f4 at ether_nh_input+0x1f4 #14 0xffffffff809b7288 at netisr_dispatch_src+0x218 #15 0xffffffff804b1038 at em_rxeof+0x1c8 #16 0xffffffff804b1414 at em_msix_rx+0x24 #17 0xffffffff808c73bd at intr_event_execute_handlers+0xfd p. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 13:41:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA9ACE5 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:41:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=1691171a9b=killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94398FC19 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r2d2 ([188.220.16.49]) by mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon PRO v10.0.4) with ESMTP id md50001303131.msg for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:41:33 +0000 X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:41:33 +0000 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 188.220.16.49 X-Return-Path: prvs=1691171a9b=killing@multiplay.co.uk X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <7C277A4EDAAB499CAC67B31D1F3976BF@multiplay.co.uk> From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Pawel Tyll" , , "Ronald Klop" References: <14710710481.20121210115455@nitronet.pl> <25C40A89BB7841C5A48906BB8243E2E7@multiplay.co.uk> <111851865.20121210131339@nitronet.pl> <0E1DD49A33CB410F89DC2A53C845715C@multiplay.co.uk> <213032430.20121210140027@nitronet.pl> <1196933053.20121210142743@nitronet.pl> Subject: Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:41:51 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:41:36 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pawel Tyll" To: "Steven Hartland" ; ; "Ronald Klop" Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 1:27 PM Subject: Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. > Here's more info, including backtrace: > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 3; apic id = 03 > fault virtual address = 0x0 > fault code = supervisor read data, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff80956c73 > stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffff82ddbe3750 > frame pointer = 0x28:0xffffff82ddbe3760 > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 12 (irq275: em1:rx 0) > trap number = 12 > panic: page fault > cpuid = 3 > KDB: stack backtrace: > #0 0xffffffff80929bb6 at kdb_backtrace+0x66 > #1 0xffffffff808f3b1e at panic+0x1ce > #2 0xffffffff80bfde10 at trap_fatal+0x290 > #3 0xffffffff80bfe148 at trap_pfault+0x1e8 > #4 0xffffffff80bfe74e at trap+0x3be > #5 0xffffffff80be7f7f at calltrap+0x8 > #6 0xffffffff80a7c1af at tcp_input+0x65f > #7 0xffffffff80a0db0d at ip_input+0xdd > #8 0xffffffff809b7288 at netisr_dispatch_src+0x218 > #9 0xffffffff809ace1d at ether_demux+0x14d > #10 0xffffffff809ad0f4 at ether_nh_input+0x1f4 > #11 0xffffffff809b7288 at netisr_dispatch_src+0x218 > #12 0xffffffff809acd3f at ether_demux+0x6f > #13 0xffffffff809ad0f4 at ether_nh_input+0x1f4 > #14 0xffffffff809b7288 at netisr_dispatch_src+0x218 > #15 0xffffffff804b1038 at em_rxeof+0x1c8 > #16 0xffffffff804b1414 at em_msix_rx+0x24 > #17 0xffffffff808c73bd at intr_event_execute_handlers+0xfd Did you get a dump from this one if so /var/crash/core.txt.X (X = number) would be of help. Regards Steve ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 13:46:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1979AF50 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:46:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ptyll@nitronet.pl) Received: from mail.nitronet.pl (smtp.nitronet.pl [195.90.106.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD5B8FC12 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:46:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailnull by mail.nitronet.pl with virscan (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti3gq-0009xV-5d for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:46:36 +0100 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:46:15 +0100 From: Pawel Tyll X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <93642218.20121210144615@nitronet.pl> To: "Steven Hartland" Subject: Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. In-Reply-To: <7C277A4EDAAB499CAC67B31D1F3976BF@multiplay.co.uk> References: <14710710481.20121210115455@nitronet.pl> <25C40A89BB7841C5A48906BB8243E2E7@multiplay.co.uk> <111851865.20121210131339@nitronet.pl> <0E1DD49A33CB410F89DC2A53C845715C@multiplay.co.uk> <213032430.20121210140027@nitronet.pl> <1196933053.20121210142743@nitronet.pl> <7C277A4EDAAB499CAC67B31D1F3976BF@multiplay.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ptyll@nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.nitronet.pl); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ronald Klop X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:46:38 -0000 Hi Steven, > Did you get a dump from this one if so /var/crash/core.txt.X > (X = number) would be of help. Yes, above is from this file. It's quite large and contains sensitive information, so I'm not comfortable in uploading whole file. Are you interested in a particular section? p. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 14:08:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF417E0 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:08:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lstewart@freebsd.org) Received: from lauren.room52.net (lauren.room52.net [210.50.193.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B368FC08 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:08:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lstewart1.loshell.room52.net (ppp59-167-184-191.static.internode.on.net [59.167.184.191]) by lauren.room52.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B91A7E820; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 01:08:24 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <50C5ECD8.5020307@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 01:08:24 +1100 From: Lawrence Stewart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120613 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pawel Tyll Subject: Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. References: <14710710481.20121210115455@nitronet.pl> <25C40A89BB7841C5A48906BB8243E2E7@multiplay.co.uk> <111851865.20121210131339@nitronet.pl> <0E1DD49A33CB410F89DC2A53C845715C@multiplay.co.uk> <213032430.20121210140027@nitronet.pl> <1196933053.20121210142743@nitronet.pl> In-Reply-To: <1196933053.20121210142743@nitronet.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lauren.room52.net Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:08:26 -0000 On 12/11/12 00:27, Pawel Tyll wrote: > Here's more info, including backtrace: > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 3; apic id = 03 > fault virtual address = 0x0 > fault code = supervisor read data, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff80956c73 > stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffff82ddbe3750 > frame pointer = 0x28:0xffffff82ddbe3760 > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 12 (irq275: em1:rx 0) > trap number = 12 > panic: page fault > cpuid = 3 > KDB: stack backtrace: > #0 0xffffffff80929bb6 at kdb_backtrace+0x66 > #1 0xffffffff808f3b1e at panic+0x1ce > #2 0xffffffff80bfde10 at trap_fatal+0x290 > #3 0xffffffff80bfe148 at trap_pfault+0x1e8 > #4 0xffffffff80bfe74e at trap+0x3be > #5 0xffffffff80be7f7f at calltrap+0x8 > #6 0xffffffff80a7c1af at tcp_input+0x65f > #7 0xffffffff80a0db0d at ip_input+0xdd > #8 0xffffffff809b7288 at netisr_dispatch_src+0x218 > #9 0xffffffff809ace1d at ether_demux+0x14d > #10 0xffffffff809ad0f4 at ether_nh_input+0x1f4 > #11 0xffffffff809b7288 at netisr_dispatch_src+0x218 > #12 0xffffffff809acd3f at ether_demux+0x6f > #13 0xffffffff809ad0f4 at ether_nh_input+0x1f4 > #14 0xffffffff809b7288 at netisr_dispatch_src+0x218 > #15 0xffffffff804b1038 at em_rxeof+0x1c8 > #16 0xffffffff804b1414 at em_msix_rx+0x24 > #17 0xffffffff808c73bd at intr_event_execute_handlers+0xfd Assuming the 9.1 kernel which is reliably crashing is at /boot/kernel/kernel (change the following instructions to suit if it is elsewhere), can you please run the following and send us the output: gdb /boot/kernel/kernel (gdb) l * tcp_input+0x65f Cheers, Lawrence From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 14:11:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F83A89 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:11:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=1691171a9b=killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F208FC16 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:11:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r2d2 ([188.220.16.49]) by mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon PRO v10.0.4) with ESMTP id md50001303375.msg for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:11:44 +0000 X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:11:44 +0000 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 188.220.16.49 X-Return-Path: prvs=1691171a9b=killing@multiplay.co.uk X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <975229DDB70447DA9BC1BB3605DEC31F@multiplay.co.uk> From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Pawel Tyll" References: <14710710481.20121210115455@nitronet.pl> <25C40A89BB7841C5A48906BB8243E2E7@multiplay.co.uk> <111851865.20121210131339@nitronet.pl> <0E1DD49A33CB410F89DC2A53C845715C@multiplay.co.uk> <213032430.20121210140027@nitronet.pl> <1196933053.20121210142743@nitronet.pl> <7C277A4EDAAB499CAC67B31D1F3976BF@multiplay.co.uk> <93642218.20121210144615@nitronet.pl> Subject: Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:12:04 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ronald Klop X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:11:49 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pawel Tyll" To: "Steven Hartland" Cc: ; "Ronald Klop" Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 1:46 PM Subject: Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. > Hi Steven, > >> Did you get a dump from this one if so /var/crash/core.txt.X >> (X = number) would be of help. > Yes, above is from this file. It's quite large and contains sensitive > information, so I'm not comfortable in uploading whole file. Are you > interested in a particular section? The gdb block at the top as that will help identify where in the code your panic is occurring. The kdb block you posted only lists offsets where as gdb lists lines. Regards Steve ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 14:22:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69329F54 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:22:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 180268FC1B for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:22:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.104.138]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti4Fs-0002b7-8f for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:22:48 +0100 Received: from [81.21.138.17] (helo=ronaldradial.versatec.local) by smtp.greenhost.nl with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti4Fs-0007DD-4I for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:22:48 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WiFi / Hot-Spot Open Source World References: <611303664348ecbdc98eafe2798eac8b.squirrel@mail.digital-infotech.net> <1355145968096-5768106.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:22:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1355145968096-5768106.post@n5.nabble.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.11 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net X-Spam-Level: + X-Spam-Score: 1.9 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50, URI_HEX autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Scan-Signature: 919fae14bc17c74543a025539baad412 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:22:51 -0000 On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:26:08 +0100, Jakub Lach wrote: > 1) This wrong list, it should be asked on -questions or -chat, > if at all. > 2) Your message is too long, and looks like on the first look > like nigerian scam (sorry), most people will not take time > to read it whole. I did not see how I could get millions from some African king, but the text was too long for me too. ;-) > 3) This is not free tech support, this is list about development > of open source system. > 4) Despite obfuscation in wall of text, you have outlined your > problem pretty well- you have bought unreliable service and / > or have unreliable tech support on the site. > 5) Again, this is open source, not free lunch. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/WiFi-Hot-Spot-Open-Source-World-tp5768087p5768106.html > Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 14:22:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE38F5A for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:22:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ptyll@nitronet.pl) Received: from mail.nitronet.pl (smtp.nitronet.pl [195.90.106.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BB08FC0C for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:22:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailnull by mail.nitronet.pl with virscan (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti4Fz-000Aoe-Nr for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:22:55 +0100 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:22:30 +0100 From: Pawel Tyll X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1069635933.20121210152230@nitronet.pl> To: "Steven Hartland" , Lawrence Stewart Subject: Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. In-Reply-To: <975229DDB70447DA9BC1BB3605DEC31F@multiplay.co.uk> References: <14710710481.20121210115455@nitronet.pl> <25C40A89BB7841C5A48906BB8243E2E7@multiplay.co.uk> <111851865.20121210131339@nitronet.pl> <0E1DD49A33CB410F89DC2A53C845715C@multiplay.co.uk> <213032430.20121210140027@nitronet.pl> <1196933053.20121210142743@nitronet.pl> <7C277A4EDAAB499CAC67B31D1F3976BF@multiplay.co.uk> <93642218.20121210144615@nitronet.pl> <975229DDB70447DA9BC1BB3605DEC31F@multiplay.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ptyll@nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.nitronet.pl); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ronald Klop X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:22:56 -0000 Hi, > The gdb block at the top as that will help identify where in the code > your panic is occurring. The kdb block you posted only lists offsets where > as gdb lists lines. Steven, Please see http://pastie.org/5506669 Lawrence, 0xffffffff80a7c1af is in tcp_input (/usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c:861). 856 th->th_dport, INPLOOKUP_WILDCARD | 857 INPLOOKUP_WLOCKPCB, m->m_pkthdr.rcvif); 858 } 859 /* Remove the tag from the packet. We don't need it anymore. */ 860 m_tag_delete(m, fwd_tag); 861 m->m_flags &= ~M_IP_NEXTHOP; 862 } else 863 inp = in_pcblookup_mbuf(&V_tcbinfo, ip->ip_src, 864 th->th_sport, ip->ip_dst, th->th_dport, 865 INPLOOKUP_WILDCARD | INPLOOKUP_WLOCKPCB, Thanks for your interest and help guys. p. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 14:39:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3872836 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:39:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serguey-grigoriev@yandex.ru) Received: from forward12.mail.yandex.net (forward12.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDB78FC16 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:39:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web18f.yandex.ru (web18f.yandex.ru [95.108.131.158]) by forward12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 81FB8C217AB for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:39:56 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by web18f.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 4925A1270030; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:39:56 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1355150396; bh=klsj3alxta5S/QkfzrR65AvsgBs+hW+qOnlcy3Pse6k=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=t/iJhwABap/Vc5uMpC7Amxigcu8YMU78/ThCz4I7a+JShcTO8LWTg6QjnAWm9YvEN oEGQHDjZlqB9JszTY5NpvGjZLuLWDLOVpsajG4WjBDcnhZw/ji6XgsiCs2dIlc3BtI 4LVfyfpe5LaPfhK1VCYdfvqS0I3+sH1hstjYKYWI= Received: from [188.134.22.116] ([188.134.22.116]) by web18f.yandex.ru with HTTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:39:56 +0400 From: S.N.Grigoriev To: FreeBSD Stable Subject: How to update ports tree indexes when using svn MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <28991355150396@web18f.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:39:56 +0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:39:58 -0000 Hi list, after the security announcement (http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html) I use svn to update my local ports tree. I've found out that the port index is not updated. What is the preferred/recommended way to update port indexes when using svn? Thanks, Serguey. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 14:44:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD869E4; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:44:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onyx.glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:c200::face]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84EA78FC0C; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:44:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (75-146-225-65-Philadelphia.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [75.146.225.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by onyx.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3FEC23F75B; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:44:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:44:50 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: "S.N.Grigoriev" Subject: Re: How to update ports tree indexes when using svn Message-ID: <20121210144450.GA1312@glenbarber.us> References: <28991355150396@web18f.yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="envbJBWh7q8WU6mo" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <28991355150396@web18f.yandex.ru> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FreeBSD Stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:44:53 -0000 --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 06:39:56PM +0400, S.N.Grigoriev wrote: > Hi list, >=20 > after the security announcement > (http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html) I use svn to > update my local ports tree. I've found out that the port index is > not updated. What is the preferred/recommended way to update port > indexes when using svn? >=20 Either 'make index' or 'make fetchindex'. Glen --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQxfViAAoJEFJPDDeguUajCjoH/RZ8IMZukTO0ftKjwkizzfZ3 CpYrgRybUQ1qMzgwYlhMUnVuvb3ujPZCQ0wRNN8o9TkvFCOaThskHB601p+rZmyS AmvMy9JFq8wtF8HVHs3L8XCjSBBSlVBPCQwwJD3NWKtzFQzhNK17sWC73ghfsRgh CmqWd9HF2Md2nJLgI0E1SUqTi3pI1MakYc58jXr7KQ4LxNKLkEKmbBJCXWB3z9Wo 1WI/Ozy4ptwrVKhdqGip1zId3q4CdBL9rZpdIlJ7DxBuAXocMV/pY4Tafy1m765C GDboSNFSz86EHkrjcbgc7NMNQikSKZ3jEuo1+XlEXZEqV0S2sNm6Hj1bw2X4nUE= =G4mJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 14:47:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD1EC03; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:47:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85EF8FC0C; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:47:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id u54so1547581wey.13 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 06:47:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=A96c+xsnuELKIZKwfi4EQN06JWZ5Ma35Pxsvrwiv0YI=; b=TAfrG8A2Coz+fX9vEf3YbtxBfMg5TDXkiNSYkLqAUDLbP3zrjO+GHF4xKcVzerYhJJ INPp143b2hIlAwr9KNy673Qddi0EW74oIJpOdEL/aS1TsefzVHZQauXg96nWvbcB066d 31oqTMn8sjFlgq+g9pD9Tro23EqyZ2JxymYQnieZkBTbETeOD5e4L1CYrHl3EkLMfevj Nm2zXT+Lc9OwHcBalXjcoKiQLzo+G7Ev2SXoNzK7dPc132Ivkmx362wWTM93UGLH73// yV71h5TrQNM2yI4cy7BzKGH+GrLwrpRbQJ5FASSjKqvVNBmuUtFXSAf18vSDv+FXHkvy 9iWg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.85.211 with SMTP id u61mr5607635wee.212.1355150822196; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 06:47:02 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.217.57.9 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 06:47:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1069635933.20121210152230@nitronet.pl> References: <14710710481.20121210115455@nitronet.pl> <25C40A89BB7841C5A48906BB8243E2E7@multiplay.co.uk> <111851865.20121210131339@nitronet.pl> <0E1DD49A33CB410F89DC2A53C845715C@multiplay.co.uk> <213032430.20121210140027@nitronet.pl> <1196933053.20121210142743@nitronet.pl> <7C277A4EDAAB499CAC67B31D1F3976BF@multiplay.co.uk> <93642218.20121210144615@nitronet.pl> <975229DDB70447DA9BC1BB3605DEC31F@multiplay.co.uk> <1069635933.20121210152230@nitronet.pl> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 06:47:01 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: P5wvw46zWi0hZr_PtEY88WGo-u0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. From: Adrian Chadd To: Pawel Tyll Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Lawrence Stewart , Steven Hartland , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ronald Klop X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:47:04 -0000 You can also list the offending IP: list *0xffffffff80956c73 adrian On 10 December 2012 06:22, Pawel Tyll wrote: > Hi, > >> The gdb block at the top as that will help identify where in the code >> your panic is occurring. The kdb block you posted only lists offsets where >> as gdb lists lines. > Steven, > > Please see http://pastie.org/5506669 > > > > Lawrence, > > 0xffffffff80a7c1af is in tcp_input (/usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c:861). > 856 th->th_dport, INPLOOKUP_WILDCARD | > 857 INPLOOKUP_WLOCKPCB, m->m_pkthdr.rcvif); > 858 } > 859 /* Remove the tag from the packet. We don't need it anymore. */ > 860 m_tag_delete(m, fwd_tag); > 861 m->m_flags &= ~M_IP_NEXTHOP; > 862 } else > 863 inp = in_pcblookup_mbuf(&V_tcbinfo, ip->ip_src, > 864 th->th_sport, ip->ip_dst, th->th_dport, > 865 INPLOOKUP_WILDCARD | INPLOOKUP_WLOCKPCB, > > Thanks for your interest and help guys. > > p. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 14:47:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6368C0A for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:47:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636588FC19 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:47:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rufus.webfusion.com (mail.heartinternet.co.uk [79.170.40.31]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBAEl3x9085207 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:47:03 GMT (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.1 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk qBAEl3x9085207 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/qBAEl3x9085207; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host mail.heartinternet.co.uk [79.170.40.31] claimed to be rufus.webfusion.com Message-ID: <50C5F5E7.7000506@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:47:03 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to update ports tree indexes when using svn References: <28991355150396@web18f.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <28991355150396@web18f.yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:47:07 -0000 On 10/12/2012 14:39, S.N.Grigoriev wrote: > after the security announcement > (http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html) I use svn to > update my local ports tree. I've found out that the port index is not > updated. What is the preferred/recommended way to update port indexes > when using svn? That ports INDEX generated for 'make fetchindex' is not being updated is a temporary thing, while machines are quarantined and rebuilt. So you could just wait for a few weeks until service is resumed. If you just have to have an INDEX before then, then pretty much your only option is to build your own. You can either use 'make index' or ports-mgmt/p5-FreeBSD-Portindex. There are various advantages either way; personally I prefer the latter, but then I'm biased, because I wrote it. Cheers, Matthew From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 15:04:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A305D1C9; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:04:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serguey-grigoriev@yandex.ru) Received: from forward3h.mail.yandex.net (forward3h.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:f05::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E2D8FC16; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:04:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web3h.yandex.ru (web3h.yandex.ru [84.201.186.32]) by forward3h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 83EBA1360CAC; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:04:15 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by web3h.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id DF11E691805C; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:04:14 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1355151855; bh=uMT07OWH9njXPeSjx6Teg96QhM8YVEH3c6ITV74guns=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date; b=W0gwRIR+2VRmOSt57xwZXisz+A3nUfqkNJFmY8ol5AbSAqmfS22YuQaxXcPQqhaWF bS+xEA/WD3C/j/61wn1zw5vbBcrPm1Y8RPees20K2u4hLY6fBVD6ijXubYL/0PDzgr NynR44MYcUQLFMZrU4c0yXtCbBwA15uxbFfCLEiQ= Received: from [188.134.22.116] ([188.134.22.116]) by web3h.yandex.ru with HTTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:04:14 +0400 From: S.N.Grigoriev To: David Wolfskill In-Reply-To: <20121210145109.GO1991@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <28991355150396@web18f.yandex.ru> <20121210145109.GO1991@albert.catwhisker.org> Subject: Re: How to update ports tree indexes when using svn MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <54421355151854@web3h.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:04:14 +0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Cc: FreeBSD Stable , FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:04:17 -0000 10.12.2012, 18:51, "David Wolfskill" : > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 06:39:56PM +0400, S.N.Grigoriev wrote: > >> šHi list, >> >> šafter the security announcement (http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html) I use svn to update my local ports tree. I've found out that the port index is not updated. What is the preferred/recommended way to update port indexes when using svn? >> š... > > First, I've redirected the list recipient from stable@ to ports@, as > this has nothing to do with which branch of the OS you're using, and > everything to do with the Ports collection. > > Second, it also has nothing to do with SVN (vs., e.g, CVS): regardless, > the INDEX is a generated file, and does not come (directly) from the > repository. > > Finally, you can perform "make index" in the ports directory, though > this tends to be time-consuming. š"make fetchindex" is an alternative, > but the usefulness of that depends on how recently that INDEX was built. > > Peace, > david > -- > David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org > Taliban: Evil men with guns afraid of truth from a 14-year old girl. > > See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. David, thanks for your detailed explanation. Thanks for all who responded my question. Regards, Serguey. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 15:06:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82940399 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:06:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garbytrash@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com (mail-pa0-f54.google.com [209.85.220.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F998FC16 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:06:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id bi5so2131289pad.13 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 07:06:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=P6b68hmjsfd5jiVjyt1ZkTAL1DbbPxdiFbnYujvmpPc=; b=Yo5QARpHSw0Y05ecEie2DFQhqPy9/RuJU+PtqLYMshYR8EQu83OhiTrb2sxadwDXB8 BVc5x1hbdmOJaLTKSL9k8mJQS5LRoskudmRJTLbK0h9UtRvNeTsmzKV5c3q32ejt87G3 gkkAaCDcIZ8KkwCAyghGo2i8WwAsd+vKE5WmUj8syRWPcCzm1IA8H8GjL2hGpnyvQmC8 mt4J5gB06QE8oOEEnawFLKVsZ+aowreEa7ENfDTNrPp9nL+KlVaFcteGey8d3RauzpbS RtGke0cvE7iTHud03w7djLNge+FgfnrmumgTvXldqzXOaQIDFGHNTDxpyDTubLcGu12C J0Iw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.239.198 with SMTP id vu6mr40227918pbc.109.1355151977766; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 07:06:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.252.166 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 07:06:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <611303664348ecbdc98eafe2798eac8b.squirrel@mail.digital-infotech.net> <1355145968096-5768106.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:06:17 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: WiFi / Hot-Spot Open Source World From: Zenny To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:06:18 -0000 To OP: I wish if you would have invested only 20-30% of what you have paid for developing the feature you wanted to opensource developers including FreeBSD team, you would not only get your solution, but also get a solution that you can tweak on your own. However, your explanation is so lengthy as Ron stated that I could not reach upto the end. And you were talking about an appliance you/your company purchaged for 40 grands, it should be asked to their technical support. Because I didn't see you specifying that the product is FreeBSD-based, not the appliance is proprietary (BSD license allows that). On 12/10/12, Ronald Klop wrote: > On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:26:08 +0100, Jakub Lach > wrote: > >> 1) This wrong list, it should be asked on -questions or -chat, >> if at all. >> 2) Your message is too long, and looks like on the first look >> like nigerian scam (sorry), most people will not take time >> to read it whole. > > I did not see how I could get millions from some African king, but the > text was too long for me too. ;-) > >> 3) This is not free tech support, this is list about development >> of open source system. >> 4) Despite obfuscation in wall of text, you have outlined your >> problem pretty well- you have bought unreliable service and / >> or have unreliable tech support on the site. >> 5) Again, this is open source, not free lunch. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/WiFi-Hot-Spot-Open-Source-World-tp5768087p5768106.html >> Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 15:06:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC888499 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:06:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ptyll@nitronet.pl) Received: from mail.nitronet.pl (smtp.nitronet.pl [195.90.106.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948058FC18 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailnull by mail.nitronet.pl with virscan (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti4wa-000C0B-MO for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:06:56 +0100 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:06:36 +0100 From: Pawel Tyll X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1024249693.20121210160636@nitronet.pl> To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. In-Reply-To: References: <14710710481.20121210115455@nitronet.pl> <25C40A89BB7841C5A48906BB8243E2E7@multiplay.co.uk> <111851865.20121210131339@nitronet.pl> <0E1DD49A33CB410F89DC2A53C845715C@multiplay.co.uk> <213032430.20121210140027@nitronet.pl> <1196933053.20121210142743@nitronet.pl> <7C277A4EDAAB499CAC67B31D1F3976BF@multiplay.co.uk> <93642218.20121210144615@nitronet.pl> <975229DDB70447DA9BC1BB3605DEC31F@multiplay.co.uk> <1069635933.20121210152230@nitronet.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ptyll@nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.nitronet.pl); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: Lawrence Stewart , Steven Hartland , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ronald Klop X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:06:58 -0000 Witam, > You can also list the offending IP: > list *0xffffffff80956c73 Excuse my ignorance, but how does that list an IP address? (gdb) list *0xffffffff80956c73 0xffffffff80956c73 is in m_tag_delete (mbuf.h:1047). 1042 */ 1043 static __inline void 1044 m_tag_unlink(struct mbuf *m, struct m_tag *t) 1045 { 1046 1047 SLIST_REMOVE(&m->m_pkthdr.tags, t, m_tag, m_tag_link); 1048 } 1049 1050 /* These are for OpenBSD compatibility. */ 1051 #define MTAG_ABI_COMPAT 0 /* compatibility ABI */ p. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 15:45:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70812998 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:45:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E5E8FC13 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.104.138]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti5XV-00088T-E4 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:45:05 +0100 Received: from [81.21.138.17] (helo=ronaldradial.versatec.local) by smtp.greenhost.nl with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti5XV-0002FH-5h for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:45:05 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. References: <14710710481.20121210115455@nitronet.pl> <25C40A89BB7841C5A48906BB8243E2E7@multiplay.co.uk> <111851865.20121210131339@nitronet.pl> <0E1DD49A33CB410F89DC2A53C845715C@multiplay.co.uk> <213032430.20121210140027@nitronet.pl> <1196933053.20121210142743@nitronet.pl> <7C277A4EDAAB499CAC67B31D1F3976BF@multiplay.co.uk> <93642218.20121210144615@nitronet.pl> <975229DDB70447DA9BC1BB3605DEC31F@multiplay.co.uk> <1069635933.20121210152230@nitronet.pl> <1024249693.20121210160636@nitronet.pl> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:45:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1024249693.20121210160636@nitronet.pl> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.11 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net X-Spam-Level: / X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Scan-Signature: 0ccaee305be983877c9e38c09cbf8ec4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:45:08 -0000 On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:06:36 +0100, Pawel Tyll wrote: > Witam, > >> You can also list the offending IP: > >> list *0xffffffff80956c73 > Excuse my ignorance, but how does that list an IP address? See your first error report mail. instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff80956c73 Ronald. > > (gdb) list *0xffffffff80956c73 > 0xffffffff80956c73 is in m_tag_delete (mbuf.h:1047). > 1042 */ > 1043 static __inline void > 1044 m_tag_unlink(struct mbuf *m, struct m_tag *t) > 1045 { > 1046 > 1047 SLIST_REMOVE(&m->m_pkthdr.tags, t, m_tag, m_tag_link); > 1048 } > 1049 > 1050 /* These are for OpenBSD compatibility. */ > 1051 #define MTAG_ABI_COMPAT 0 /* compatibility > ABI */ > > p. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 15:50:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2444ABDB for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:50:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6998FC1B for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.104.138]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti5cz-00006a-Nf for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:50:46 +0100 Received: from [81.21.138.17] (helo=ronaldradial.versatec.local) by smtp.greenhost.nl with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti5cz-0002U3-HX for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:50:45 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to update ports tree indexes when using svn References: <28991355150396@web18f.yandex.ru> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:50:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <28991355150396@web18f.yandex.ru> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.11 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net X-Spam-Level: / X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Scan-Signature: 7b320cd02cd98c580351ccd23ba1512a X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:50:48 -0000 On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:39:56 +0100, S.N.Grigoriev wrote: > Hi list, > > after the security announcement > (http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html) I use svn to update > my local ports tree. I've found out that the port index is not updated. > What is the preferred/recommended way to update port indexes when using > svn? Unless you are a ports committer I recommend you use portsnap to update your ports tree. It takes care of the INDEX file too. Ronald. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 16:27:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8DD80E; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:27:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8998FC19; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBAGR0ms052588; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:27:00 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id qBAGR0DA052585; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:27:00 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:27:00 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: How to update ports tree indexes when using svn In-Reply-To: <50C5F5E7.7000506@freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <28991355150396@web18f.yandex.ru> <50C5F5E7.7000506@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:27:00 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:27:01 -0000 On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 10/12/2012 14:39, S.N.Grigoriev wrote: >> after the security announcement >> (http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html) I use svn to >> update my local ports tree. I've found out that the port index is not >> updated. What is the preferred/recommended way to update port indexes >> when using svn? > > That ports INDEX generated for 'make fetchindex' is not being updated is > a temporary thing, while machines are quarantined and rebuilt. So you > could just wait for a few weeks until service is resumed. 'portmaster -L' also seems to work without an updated index, just leave out the --index-only option. I have not looked to see how it does that so quickly, or verified that it does not miss anything. # portmaster -L | egrep '(ew|ort) version|total install' From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 16:54:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B311D6 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:54:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BC48FC13 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:54:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id qBAGslwn063016; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 03:54:48 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 03:54:47 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Jakub Lach Subject: Re: Help review the FAQ In-Reply-To: <1355068983136-5767809.post@n5.nabble.com> Message-ID: <20121211034618.H52305@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <50B3E8A6.7060004@ose.nl> <50B46F5D.1040100@netfence.it> <50B471F1.5040704@ose.nl> <1354015603346-5764584.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354271955297-5765495.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354912564145-5767462.post@n5.nabble.com> <50C25B8F.2010605@ose.nl> <1355068021135-5767808.post@n5.nabble.com> <1355068983136-5767809.post@n5.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:54:58 -0000 On Sun, 9 Dec 2012 08:03:03 -0800, Jakub Lach wrote: > Probably already axed, it was supported by > dev/sound/isa/mss.c and isa/snd/ad1848.c I think. Add text and items enhancing knowledge for later and latest kit, by all means, but - just speaking generally - "Careful with that axe, Eugene!" cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 17:35:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDBF216; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:35:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDFDC8FC15; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Toshi.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2] (may be forged)) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA02736; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:35:19 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:34:44 -0700 To: Adrian Chadd From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? In-Reply-To: References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:35:22 -0000 At 03:41 PM 12/9/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: >I'll amend my "stuff that will help" list: > >* Donate to the freebsd foundation, along with opening discussions to >them about how your organisation uses / relies upon freebsd; >* Volunteer to join the release engineering / package building teams, >and actively donate manpower to the project. I've thought about donating manpower; tried to many years ago, in fact. But I was deterred by the egos, the politics, and the territoriality and hotheadedness of some of the developers. So, most of my contributions of code (and I have made quite a few) have been passed quietly through committers so as to avoid this. Maybe the situation is better now; I don't know. As for monetary donations: We are not a large corporation, and so could only make relatively small ones as opposed to more valuable "in kind" donations. --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 18:52:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B02DFF for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:52:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553198FC14 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti8Sp-0000tk-Hf for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:52:27 -0800 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:52:27 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1355165547540-5768186.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <20121211034618.H52305@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <50B46F5D.1040100@netfence.it> <50B471F1.5040704@ose.nl> <1354015603346-5764584.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354271955297-5765495.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354912564145-5767462.post@n5.nabble.com> <50C25B8F.2010605@ose.nl> <1355068021135-5767808.post@n5.nabble.com> <1355068983136-5767809.post@n5.nabble.com> <20121211034618.H52305@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Subject: Re: Help review the FAQ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:52:29 -0000 Exactly, I assumed mss.c was history already, because I looked only in modules, while there is plenty isa stuff in src/sys/dev/sound/isa still! /usr/src/sys/dev/sound/isa $ ls -a . ad1816.h mss.c sb16.c sndbuf_dma.c .. ess.c mss.h sb8.c ad1816.c gusc.c sb.h sbc.c Sorry. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5768186.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 22:25:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE71BE24 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:25:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3767B8FC0C for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:25:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hm9so1555513wib.13 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:25:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=PJH6rQmjWfq8bcxLI5aSoGF+3s8jHg0t3byia2X3P0c=; b=BEflmt4e5xzkZMpWB63S1Sf3j9phRobCd6oKRWOxL4YjuyaaUPIBXrzDpLRdeSH07a XdsLwlaMJuKitjyb5eUm9jiE9fl8FJZWb3SpAUq0gXrd8PjZW9wZEdtIKhc3gZ1Cu50/ eOHY4jLCQ1XvpnhNovuipVTntx+bHI3wUNOaKDyas3WgZgepZtg/m/vDvZMy0LQxPg0L 55auf2cl3CHz+JWtKewjrY5ZTXQvGZtUMxt1QhXNgu0R7avlKx0Afrc/VVI7s1JD4zhZ KUYfkPxh0nzQdkwLS/LPPmJC3lmrUrhnA65Mu+oSygmdL+KYkovG6xiJN1Co2h6Aeb3l ZGvQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.78.1 with SMTP id x1mr13363258wiw.17.1355178313049; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:25:13 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.217.57.9 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:25:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <611303664348ecbdc98eafe2798eac8b.squirrel@mail.digital-infotech.net> References: <611303664348ecbdc98eafe2798eac8b.squirrel@mail.digital-infotech.net> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:25:12 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: R4H9m9_DuxiyLuu8C8BiRsOVlOM Message-ID: Subject: Re: WiFi / Hot-Spot Open Source World From: Adrian Chadd To: shiv.nath@digital-infotech.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: centos@centos.org, freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, debian-user@lists.debian.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:25:14 -0000 Hi, If your product uses FreeBSD wireless code, please ask your vendor to liaise with the FreeBSD wireless community and work with us to improve things. I have no idea who the vendor is though, so this is all total conjecture. Adrian On 10 December 2012 04:51, Shiv. Nath wrote: > Dear Experts > > i am sure many of you would be the part of the real game, where lot of > technology is implemented (Internet Service Providers) those serve > thousands of clients everyday . i am requesting opinion & advice from > those experts. Surfing web does not help much unless someone who is > practically touch and making the use of the technology everyday. And i > could not find the best place than this where i can ask this question & > where my request can reach highly technical peoples those know the > information i need. > > Your advice is valuable, i wish to thanks in advance to those guys would > spend their imp time to discuss or respond to this matter. The topic is > WiFi / Hot-Spot reliable solution in open source world. > > I work with ISP offering service for hotspots and cafe clubs. initially > company was using hosted service to authenticate / validate hotspot-cafe > users etc for many years. Eventually, our management decided to purchased > a solution that can be one time investment and serve the need for our > clients. 24-Online is a wifi & hotspot solution comes in form of > appliance. We purchased 24-Online appliance that costed more than $40,000. > We purchased by thinking that it is commercial product and it would be > reliable and considered support as well, anyways. > > After started using the solution, we released that is not reliable AT ALL. > Almost everyday appliance has problems. sometimes it does not issue ip > address (DHCP) to hotspot client, if that happens, it does not redirect to > portal page so that a user can fill voucher number and start browsing. in > short, everyday this & that. As said, we have purchased the commercial > support as well but support guys take several hours sometime whole weekend > to troubleshoot the problem. in result our customers are down. we have > refund and call for apologies for the service interruption. After this one > year frustration, i wish to seek advice form experts. what kind of program > or what is the right approach to handle this wifi-hotspot clients using > Linux/ Unix. Is there anything reliable exists that can work without > everyday problem. i understand it is a technology once in a while always > be some problem there but not everyday on words. There are four services > those can make it work. > > 1.) User reached hotspot --> Switched his laptop on --> DHCP request > travels to our data center using existing link to hotspot & hotspot > software should issue a ip to the user (DHCP functionality). > > 2.) User clicked on his browser icon --> browser opens --> Request is > redirected to a web server (customer portal page) where user can fill his > valid voucher number he purchased form hotspot site for browsing(Apache > functionality) > > 3.) User clicks ok after entering his voucher number --> authentication > happens --> (FreeRadious functionality) > > 4.) Then accounting --> user can only browse for 1 hours if he purchased > one hour voucher --> (FreeRadious functionality) > > > how can i put all four service together and make stuff working. > > Thanks / Thanks > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 23:26:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99886B0E; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:26:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243D08FC08; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:26:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id fo14so4008035vcb.13 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:26:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cLjMkcV2qt5T836p0dfHzlFPxf5w+rgNlmJ73aPRjlE=; b=U/EYN40sNyvxkWbqcpihG/61K6hGsWaE5Y7+WoRSgnwc1teiRow2noOGJglUZ68tg3 nX2NxIhhTU6y/zmuO19eTTAFGY1Hk9J+6CtUg1xsKJ+AGyqAOxsaFLdqhZ8YM6CTyUf+ rWkkhws8WIRbMDWX54fe7EwRyW8MDwGKu8Q9p350kbe8y3SFNCvYj8iULrzyeDlI0566 uiBJJ243pSvCbrphTp4Nh3nnIuHzsXccDwWUldg/+ZPsLFlTkr5DqzR19WypLs8q8Tpy +DDGJvmQy985ohELzyP6mj3yXG75qHjvI6h/5GZnQo5rRL5XQKjtIYiagEyMCCrPotAi rfxQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.59.13.135 with SMTP id ey7mr10224257ved.37.1355181965214; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:26:05 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.58.201.202 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:26:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1024249693.20121210160636@nitronet.pl> References: <14710710481.20121210115455@nitronet.pl> <25C40A89BB7841C5A48906BB8243E2E7@multiplay.co.uk> <111851865.20121210131339@nitronet.pl> <0E1DD49A33CB410F89DC2A53C845715C@multiplay.co.uk> <213032430.20121210140027@nitronet.pl> <1196933053.20121210142743@nitronet.pl> <7C277A4EDAAB499CAC67B31D1F3976BF@multiplay.co.uk> <93642218.20121210144615@nitronet.pl> <975229DDB70447DA9BC1BB3605DEC31F@multiplay.co.uk> <1069635933.20121210152230@nitronet.pl> <1024249693.20121210160636@nitronet.pl> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:26:05 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4ijoiJ1_iopSZEDR_srtbiN-b8E Message-ID: Subject: Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. From: Adrian Chadd To: Pawel Tyll Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Lawrence Stewart , Steven Hartland , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ronald Klop X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:26:06 -0000 Instruction Pointer. :-) adrian On 10 December 2012 07:06, Pawel Tyll wrote: > Witam, > >> You can also list the offending IP: > >> list *0xffffffff80956c73 > Excuse my ignorance, but how does that list an IP address? > > (gdb) list *0xffffffff80956c73 > 0xffffffff80956c73 is in m_tag_delete (mbuf.h:1047). > 1042 */ > 1043 static __inline void > 1044 m_tag_unlink(struct mbuf *m, struct m_tag *t) > 1045 { > 1046 > 1047 SLIST_REMOVE(&m->m_pkthdr.tags, t, m_tag, m_tag_link); > 1048 } > 1049 > 1050 /* These are for OpenBSD compatibility. */ > 1051 #define MTAG_ABI_COMPAT 0 /* compatibility ABI */ > > p. > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 23:29:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 556E2C3D; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:29:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7008FC13; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:29:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l1so4018146vba.13 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:29:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=D6dRtRyLfM7hiaF9s+w4t2fEw6Gw4fqY+BetgMUXztY=; b=QYh8HdqvjhofKHgzzsXnvtkWNZMohJechYwmaiuw4yXe5On94gkUYm2lG79VzR3HyK p34UuKKKgrw7f7F0vsG9PnCBuGasAy78xyUtVD9lTF+gueif6tCmIdy7XGAkyg7RrvOx GR8mh/OiCuEm5rDu1dj5xA7E0um3k0eO18BZMPZXGhqqrz8frB50Fmm9rsqriyJuxC9r wCSdolgHo+hk2O/G6TrP+7gpoGwQxz3IE6/9C3gK7Nv8uB65pMyBo1L/TbSvfCzWJRsy BtMJYNN0o2mKyInFjGsFKf2tNHEKGYIqG0YU+D2dnXo0Oqtg4vtf9V0YGmmnzb5Rs3jT wqTA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.67.133 with SMTP id n5mr8676919vdt.24.1355182148068; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:29:08 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.58.201.202 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:29:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:29:08 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: FSk7S_mafwqpcQv1oSMDWEH_rzQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? From: Adrian Chadd To: Brett Glass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:29:09 -0000 On 10 December 2012 09:34, Brett Glass wrote: > I've thought about donating manpower; tried to many years ago, in fact. > But I was deterred by the egos, the politics, and the territoriality and > hotheadedness of some of the developers. So, most of my contributions > of code (and I have made quite a few) have been passed quietly through > committers so as to avoid this. Maybe the situation is better now; I don't > know. There's politics in every organisation. There are ego clashes in every organisation. Sometimes you'll fit in, sometimes you won't. If you feel there are issues, find people inside the community who you do get along well with and talk with them about it. It sucks, yes. I'm one of those "shut up and code already" types and I deal badly with politics. But somehow I have a commit bit and get away with breaking things. :-) > As for monetary donations: We are not a large corporation, and so could only > make relatively small ones as opposed to more valuable "in kind" donations. Even a $5k a year donation from 25 organisations is a significant chunk of money to the foundation. Please don't believe that you can't have a positive effect from a small donation. the foundation will definitely benefit from any and all contributions, no matter how small. I'd rather see the Foundation funded from thousands of small donations a year than a handful of big ones. Adrian From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 10 23:53:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3110D809; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:53:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC49E8FC15; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:52:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Toshi.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2] (may be forged)) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA09737; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:52:48 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <201212102352.QAA09737@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:52:22 -0700 To: Adrian Chadd From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? In-Reply-To: References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:53:00 -0000 At 04:29 PM 12/10/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: >There's politics in every organisation. There are ego clashes in every >organisation. Sometimes you'll fit in, sometimes you won't. If you >feel there are issues, find people inside the community who you do get >along well with and talk with them about it. > >It sucks, yes. I'm one of those "shut up and code already" types and I >deal badly with politics. Me, too. That's why I have been contributing code quietly through others rather than putting myself out in the front lines. In any event -- back to the original topic -- there should indeed be better communications between the Release Engineering team and the community. The time it takes to post updates -- especially as it gets close to release time -- would be recovered many times over because folks like me wouldn't have any need to e-mail regarding status and projected schedules. ;-) --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 00:16:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6796633 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:16:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ask@develooper.com) Received: from mbox1.develooper.com (mbox1.develooper.com [207.171.7.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D7A8FC12 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:16:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mbox1.develooper.com (mbox1.develooper.com [127.0.0.1]) by mbox1.develooper.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE33F175A9F for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:58:50 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 32419 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2012 23:58:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ask.bur.sol) (ask@mail.dev@64.235.248.131) by smtp.develooper.com with ESMTPA; 10 Dec 2012 23:58:50 -0000 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: freebsd-update mergemaster options Message-Id: <612DB7D4-07CA-4C48-98F8-081C33E85812@develooper.com> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:58:50 -0800 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:16:11 -0000 Hi, On an 8.2 box, I run freebsd-update -r 8.3-RELEASE upgrade I am getting hundreds of files with "conflicts" like: <<<<<<< current version # $FreeBSD: src/etc/auth.conf,v 1.6.32.1.4.1 2010/06/14 02:09:06 = kensmith Exp $ =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D # $FreeBSD: src/etc/auth.conf,v 1.6.32.1.8.1 2012/03/03 06:15:13 = kensmith Exp $ >>>>>>> 8.3-RELEASE ... which is just tremendously unhelpful. I'm using the default = freebsd-update configuration. Per an old mail from the archives I made = sure I have /etc/mergemaster.rc setup as below, but it doesn't seem to = make a difference. Any ideas? In the past I've just given up on using freebsd-update and = gone back to manually compiling and installing world, but for this box = I'd really like not to. Ask $ cat /etc/mergemaster.rc # Automatically install files that do not exist AUTO_INSTALL=3D'yes' # Automatically upgrade files that have not been edited AUTO_UPGRADE=3D'yes' # Ignore files that I don't want changed IGNORE_FILES=3D'/etc/motd' # Do not display changes that only affect whitespace DIFF_FLAG=3D"'.Bub'" # Ignore CVS id lines to stop replacing files where only that line has = changed DIFF_OPTIONS=3D'-I$FreeBSD:.*[$]'= From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 03:57:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EBB4A5C; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 03:57:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (freebsd-stable.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:3::6502:9b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB148FC12; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 03:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBB3vTTX088791; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 03:57:29 GMT (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: (from tinderbox@localhost) by freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qBB3vTut088786; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 03:57:29 GMT (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 03:57:29 GMT Message-Id: <201212110357.qBB3vTut088786@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca> X-Authentication-Warning: freebsd-stable.sentex.ca: tinderbox set sender to FreeBSD Tinderbox using -f Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Subject: [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on arm/arm Precedence: bulk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 03:57:30 -0000 TB --- 2012-12-11 03:23:48 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-12-11 03:23:48 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtancsa@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2012-12-11 03:23:48 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2012-12-11 03:23:48 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-12-11 03:23:48 - checking out /src from svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9 TB --- 2012-12-11 03:23:48 - cd /tinderbox/RELENG_9/arm/arm TB --- 2012-12-11 03:23:48 - /usr/local/bin/svn cleanup /src TB --- 2012-12-11 03:24:22 - /usr/local/bin/svn update /src TB --- 2012-12-11 03:24:33 - At svn revision 244108 TB --- 2012-12-11 03:24:34 - building world TB --- 2012-12-11 03:24:34 - CROSS_BUILD_TESTING=YES TB --- 2012-12-11 03:24:34 - MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/obj TB --- 2012-12-11 03:24:34 - PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/sbin TB --- 2012-12-11 03:24:34 - SRCCONF=/dev/null TB --- 2012-12-11 03:24:34 - TARGET=arm TB --- 2012-12-11 03:24:34 - TARGET_ARCH=arm TB --- 2012-12-11 03:24:34 - TZ=UTC TB --- 2012-12-11 03:24:34 - __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null TB --- 2012-12-11 03:24:34 - cd /src TB --- 2012-12-11 03:24:34 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> World build started on Tue Dec 11 03:24:35 UTC 2012 >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything [...] ===> bin/expr (all) cc -O -pipe -std=gnu99 -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wunused-parameter -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -Wold-style-definition -Wno-pointer-sign -c expr.c cc1: warnings being treated as errors /src/bin/expr/expr.y: In function 'main': /src/bin/expr/expr.y:291: warning: implicit declaration of function 'yyparse' /src/bin/expr/expr.y:291: warning: nested extern declaration of 'yyparse' expr.c: At top level: expr.c:813: warning: no previous prototype for 'yyparse' *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/bin/expr. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/bin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. TB --- 2012-12-11 03:57:29 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2012-12-11 03:57:29 - ERROR: failed to build world TB --- 2012-12-11 03:57:29 - 1497.01 user 348.71 system 2021.38 real http://tinderbox.freebsd.org/tinderbox-releng_9-RELENG_9-arm-arm.full From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 04:06:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D523C04; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:06:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897728FC08; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:06:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id c13so2388321eek.13 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:06:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=OskD0c6I/KAiwSy5tf6iWRKzeteEbIBb5hCKDXk3deE=; b=WooHcPhoSZppX3ae1lgTYYs+t7Pc73cA3nNywTyjXsejzREILIBE2xa7cUwyMaJJAP kmKa1HiO5cf3V2FV0uptH0A7IF1qlFvq2bfw3Eeu9Ic11i7iWlptibmAP4Jal4Nk5MqJ yR03AxzCrK6xxNtQ7bC0qoKZZoZHTlJg28HV0ztGJe3452lAAt5ta+g2zjWXzCEUscdZ mTw9PG50XW67BPOgd7h8/FQ5iBeESAzVVFRKtbKVRQpuDS/1EL3+k04vcT4G/+4DYJmr MA7iLFgXMLvnRumpvqblGsDppIVrgg5Mwlg95iVFkYKq6JDY+CJeYQrVP5iYytly9rcO VpAw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.204.198 with SMTP id h46mr48223659eeo.1.1355198784479; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:06:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.170.193 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:06:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201212102352.QAA09737@lariat.net> References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> <201212102352.QAA09737@lariat.net> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:06:24 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? From: Kevin Oberman To: Brett Glass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Adrian Chadd , stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:06:26 -0000 On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Brett Glass wrote: > At 04:29 PM 12/10/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> There's politics in every organisation. There are ego clashes in every >> organisation. Sometimes you'll fit in, sometimes you won't. If you >> feel there are issues, find people inside the community who you do get >> along well with and talk with them about it. >> >> It sucks, yes. I'm one of those "shut up and code already" types and I >> deal badly with politics. > > > Me, too. That's why I have been contributing code quietly through others > rather than putting myself out in the front lines. > > In any event -- back to the original topic -- there should indeed be better > communications between the Release Engineering team and the community. > The time it takes to post updates -- especially as it gets close to release > time -- would be recovered many times over because folks like me wouldn't > have any need to e-mail regarding status and projected schedules. ;-) I whole-heatedly agree... but I know a little about release engineering for a large project, especially when the release team is unpaid and has to honor commitments to $real_job. Release engineering is very detail-oriented and unforgiving. This is not really compatible with part-time work. The RE must be focused, first ans foremost, on getting a release out the door as quickly as possible and not to have any serious problems with that release. This makes it very had to pull bakc and make announcements or even update posted schedules. That is made even worse by hte desire to make such communication accurate or at least useful. Since there is a LOT of guessing involved in pulling together a release (how long will "Joe" take to fix this problem or why are there half a dozen reports of a serious issue with the RC, when no one else can reproduce it or even figure out what part of the system is causing it), RE folks are usually reticent about trying to give out any information since it will most likely be inaccurate. This is why I accept the line that it will be released when it is ready. I really think it's about ready, but not even the head of the 9.1 RE team KNOWS when it will be ready, even if the ISO builds are started. "There is many a slip twixt the cup and the lip." -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 05:20:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC500E29; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:20:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (freebsd-stable.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:3::6502:9b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8742C8FC08; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:20:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBB5KNt6041992; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:20:23 GMT (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: (from tinderbox@localhost) by freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qBB5KN7S041987; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:20:23 GMT (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:20:23 GMT Message-Id: <201212110520.qBB5KN7S041987@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca> X-Authentication-Warning: freebsd-stable.sentex.ca: tinderbox set sender to FreeBSD Tinderbox using -f Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Subject: [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64 Precedence: bulk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:20:23 -0000 TB --- 2012-12-11 04:33:48 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-12-11 04:33:48 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtancsa@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2012-12-11 04:33:48 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2012-12-11 04:33:48 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-12-11 04:33:48 - checking out /src from svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9 TB --- 2012-12-11 04:33:48 - cd /tinderbox/RELENG_9/ia64/ia64 TB --- 2012-12-11 04:33:48 - /usr/local/bin/svn cleanup /src TB --- 2012-12-11 04:34:29 - /usr/local/bin/svn update /src TB --- 2012-12-11 04:34:39 - At svn revision 244109 TB --- 2012-12-11 04:34:40 - building world TB --- 2012-12-11 04:34:40 - CROSS_BUILD_TESTING=YES TB --- 2012-12-11 04:34:40 - MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/obj TB --- 2012-12-11 04:34:40 - PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/sbin TB --- 2012-12-11 04:34:40 - SRCCONF=/dev/null TB --- 2012-12-11 04:34:40 - TARGET=ia64 TB --- 2012-12-11 04:34:40 - TARGET_ARCH=ia64 TB --- 2012-12-11 04:34:40 - TZ=UTC TB --- 2012-12-11 04:34:40 - __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null TB --- 2012-12-11 04:34:40 - cd /src TB --- 2012-12-11 04:34:40 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> World build started on Tue Dec 11 04:34:41 UTC 2012 >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything [...] ===> bin/expr (all) cc -O2 -pipe -std=gnu99 -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wunused-parameter -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -Wold-style-definition -Wno-pointer-sign -c expr.c cc1: warnings being treated as errors /src/bin/expr/expr.y: In function 'main': /src/bin/expr/expr.y:291: warning: implicit declaration of function 'yyparse' /src/bin/expr/expr.y:291: warning: nested extern declaration of 'yyparse' expr.c: At top level: expr.c:813: warning: no previous prototype for 'yyparse' *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/bin/expr. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/bin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. TB --- 2012-12-11 05:20:22 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2012-12-11 05:20:22 - ERROR: failed to build world TB --- 2012-12-11 05:20:22 - 2207.03 user 381.90 system 2794.07 real http://tinderbox.freebsd.org/tinderbox-releng_9-RELENG_9-ia64-ia64.full From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 05:45:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3102244A; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:45:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (freebsd-stable.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:3::6502:9b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE678FC0C; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBB5jBg4093708; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:45:11 GMT (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: (from tinderbox@localhost) by freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qBB5jBDo093707; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:45:11 GMT (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:45:11 GMT Message-Id: <201212110545.qBB5jBDo093707@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca> X-Authentication-Warning: freebsd-stable.sentex.ca: tinderbox set sender to FreeBSD Tinderbox using -f Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Subject: [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386 Precedence: bulk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:45:12 -0000 TB --- 2012-12-11 03:57:29 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-12-11 03:57:29 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtancsa@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2012-12-11 03:57:29 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2012-12-11 03:57:29 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-12-11 03:57:29 - checking out /src from svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9 TB --- 2012-12-11 03:57:29 - cd /tinderbox/RELENG_9/i386/i386 TB --- 2012-12-11 03:57:29 - /usr/local/bin/svn cleanup /src TB --- 2012-12-11 03:58:09 - /usr/local/bin/svn update /src TB --- 2012-12-11 03:58:18 - At svn revision 244108 TB --- 2012-12-11 03:58:19 - building world TB --- 2012-12-11 03:58:19 - CROSS_BUILD_TESTING=YES TB --- 2012-12-11 03:58:19 - MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/obj TB --- 2012-12-11 03:58:19 - PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/sbin TB --- 2012-12-11 03:58:19 - SRCCONF=/dev/null TB --- 2012-12-11 03:58:19 - TARGET=i386 TB --- 2012-12-11 03:58:19 - TARGET_ARCH=i386 TB --- 2012-12-11 03:58:19 - TZ=UTC TB --- 2012-12-11 03:58:19 - __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null TB --- 2012-12-11 03:58:19 - cd /src TB --- 2012-12-11 03:58:19 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> World build started on Tue Dec 11 03:58:20 UTC 2012 >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything [...] ===> bin/expr (all) cc -O2 -pipe -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wunused-parameter -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -Wold-style-definition -Wno-pointer-sign -c expr.c cc1: warnings being treated as errors /src/bin/expr/expr.y: In function 'main': /src/bin/expr/expr.y:291: warning: implicit declaration of function 'yyparse' /src/bin/expr/expr.y:291: warning: nested extern declaration of 'yyparse' expr.c: At top level: expr.c:813: warning: no previous prototype for 'yyparse' *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/bin/expr. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/bin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. TB --- 2012-12-11 05:45:11 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2012-12-11 05:45:11 - ERROR: failed to build world TB --- 2012-12-11 05:45:11 - 5353.02 user 604.66 system 6461.60 real http://tinderbox.freebsd.org/tinderbox-releng_9-RELENG_9-i386-i386.full From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 05:56:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5D87E1; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:56:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (freebsd-stable.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:3::6502:9b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E798FC12; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBB5uiSX082042; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:56:44 GMT (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: (from tinderbox@localhost) by freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qBB5ui34082041; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:56:44 GMT (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:56:44 GMT Message-Id: <201212110556.qBB5ui34082041@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca> X-Authentication-Warning: freebsd-stable.sentex.ca: tinderbox set sender to FreeBSD Tinderbox using -f Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Subject: [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on mips/mips Precedence: bulk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:56:45 -0000 TB --- 2012-12-11 05:20:23 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-12-11 05:20:23 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtancsa@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2012-12-11 05:20:23 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2012-12-11 05:20:23 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-12-11 05:20:23 - checking out /src from svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9 TB --- 2012-12-11 05:20:23 - cd /tinderbox/RELENG_9/mips/mips TB --- 2012-12-11 05:20:23 - /usr/local/bin/svn cleanup /src TB --- 2012-12-11 05:21:04 - /usr/local/bin/svn update /src TB --- 2012-12-11 05:21:11 - At svn revision 244110 TB --- 2012-12-11 05:21:12 - building world TB --- 2012-12-11 05:21:12 - CROSS_BUILD_TESTING=YES TB --- 2012-12-11 05:21:12 - MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/obj TB --- 2012-12-11 05:21:12 - PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/sbin TB --- 2012-12-11 05:21:12 - SRCCONF=/dev/null TB --- 2012-12-11 05:21:12 - TARGET=mips TB --- 2012-12-11 05:21:12 - TARGET_ARCH=mips TB --- 2012-12-11 05:21:12 - TZ=UTC TB --- 2012-12-11 05:21:12 - __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null TB --- 2012-12-11 05:21:12 - cd /src TB --- 2012-12-11 05:21:12 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> World build started on Tue Dec 11 05:21:13 UTC 2012 >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything [...] ===> bin/expr (all) cc -O -pipe -G0 -std=gnu99 -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wunused-parameter -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -Wold-style-definition -Wno-pointer-sign -c expr.c cc1: warnings being treated as errors /src/bin/expr/expr.y: In function 'main': /src/bin/expr/expr.y:291: warning: implicit declaration of function 'yyparse' /src/bin/expr/expr.y:291: warning: nested extern declaration of 'yyparse' expr.c: At top level: expr.c:813: warning: no previous prototype for 'yyparse' *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/bin/expr. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/bin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. TB --- 2012-12-11 05:56:44 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2012-12-11 05:56:44 - ERROR: failed to build world TB --- 2012-12-11 05:56:44 - 1521.03 user 339.12 system 2181.02 real http://tinderbox.freebsd.org/tinderbox-releng_9-RELENG_9-mips-mips.full From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 06:00:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0ECBD8; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:00:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (freebsd-stable.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:3::6502:9b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BCB8FC08; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBB60j8g011799; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:00:45 GMT (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: (from tinderbox@localhost) by freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qBB60j0a011794; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:00:45 GMT (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:00:45 GMT Message-Id: <201212110600.qBB60j0a011794@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca> X-Authentication-Warning: freebsd-stable.sentex.ca: tinderbox set sender to FreeBSD Tinderbox using -f Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Subject: [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98 Precedence: bulk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:00:45 -0000 TB --- 2012-12-11 04:11:44 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-12-11 04:11:44 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtancsa@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2012-12-11 04:11:44 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2012-12-11 04:11:44 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-12-11 04:11:44 - checking out /src from svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9 TB --- 2012-12-11 04:11:44 - cd /tinderbox/RELENG_9/i386/pc98 TB --- 2012-12-11 04:11:44 - /usr/local/bin/svn cleanup /src TB --- 2012-12-11 04:12:57 - /usr/local/bin/svn update /src TB --- 2012-12-11 04:13:07 - At svn revision 244108 TB --- 2012-12-11 04:13:08 - building world TB --- 2012-12-11 04:13:08 - CROSS_BUILD_TESTING=YES TB --- 2012-12-11 04:13:08 - MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/obj TB --- 2012-12-11 04:13:08 - PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/sbin TB --- 2012-12-11 04:13:08 - SRCCONF=/dev/null TB --- 2012-12-11 04:13:08 - TARGET=pc98 TB --- 2012-12-11 04:13:08 - TARGET_ARCH=i386 TB --- 2012-12-11 04:13:08 - TZ=UTC TB --- 2012-12-11 04:13:08 - __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null TB --- 2012-12-11 04:13:08 - cd /src TB --- 2012-12-11 04:13:08 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> World build started on Tue Dec 11 04:13:10 UTC 2012 >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything [...] ===> bin/expr (all) cc -O2 -pipe -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wunused-parameter -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -Wold-style-definition -Wno-pointer-sign -c expr.c cc1: warnings being treated as errors /src/bin/expr/expr.y: In function 'main': /src/bin/expr/expr.y:291: warning: implicit declaration of function 'yyparse' /src/bin/expr/expr.y:291: warning: nested extern declaration of 'yyparse' expr.c: At top level: expr.c:813: warning: no previous prototype for 'yyparse' *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/bin/expr. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/bin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. TB --- 2012-12-11 06:00:45 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2012-12-11 06:00:45 - ERROR: failed to build world TB --- 2012-12-11 06:00:45 - 5308.69 user 612.20 system 6540.73 real http://tinderbox.freebsd.org/tinderbox-releng_9-RELENG_9-i386-pc98.full From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 06:39:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B262681A; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:39:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (freebsd-stable.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:3::6502:9b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7209D8FC08; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBB6dX2k020755; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:39:33 GMT (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: (from tinderbox@localhost) by freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qBB6dX8C020754; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:39:33 GMT (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:39:33 GMT Message-Id: <201212110639.qBB6dX8C020754@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca> X-Authentication-Warning: freebsd-stable.sentex.ca: tinderbox set sender to FreeBSD Tinderbox using -f Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Subject: [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 Precedence: bulk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:39:34 -0000 TB --- 2012-12-11 06:00:45 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-12-11 06:00:45 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtancsa@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2012-12-11 06:00:45 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2012-12-11 06:00:45 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-12-11 06:00:45 - checking out /src from svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9 TB --- 2012-12-11 06:00:45 - cd /tinderbox/RELENG_9/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2012-12-11 06:00:45 - /usr/local/bin/svn cleanup /src TB --- 2012-12-11 06:01:26 - /usr/local/bin/svn update /src TB --- 2012-12-11 06:01:34 - At svn revision 244111 TB --- 2012-12-11 06:01:35 - building world TB --- 2012-12-11 06:01:35 - CROSS_BUILD_TESTING=YES TB --- 2012-12-11 06:01:35 - MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/obj TB --- 2012-12-11 06:01:35 - PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/sbin TB --- 2012-12-11 06:01:35 - SRCCONF=/dev/null TB --- 2012-12-11 06:01:35 - TARGET=sparc64 TB --- 2012-12-11 06:01:35 - TARGET_ARCH=sparc64 TB --- 2012-12-11 06:01:35 - TZ=UTC TB --- 2012-12-11 06:01:35 - __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null TB --- 2012-12-11 06:01:35 - cd /src TB --- 2012-12-11 06:01:35 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> World build started on Tue Dec 11 06:01:36 UTC 2012 >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything [...] ===> bin/expr (all) cc -O2 -pipe -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wunused-parameter -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -Wold-style-definition -Wno-pointer-sign -c expr.c cc1: warnings being treated as errors /src/bin/expr/expr.y: In function 'main': /src/bin/expr/expr.y:291: warning: implicit declaration of function 'yyparse' /src/bin/expr/expr.y:291: warning: nested extern declaration of 'yyparse' expr.c: At top level: expr.c:813: warning: no previous prototype for 'yyparse' *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/bin/expr. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/bin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. TB --- 2012-12-11 06:39:33 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2012-12-11 06:39:33 - ERROR: failed to build world TB --- 2012-12-11 06:39:33 - 1743.67 user 335.81 system 2328.51 real http://tinderbox.freebsd.org/tinderbox-releng_9-RELENG_9-sparc64-sparc64.full From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 06:55:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A31BE88 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:55:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFAA48FC13 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:55:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Footer: b3NlLm5s Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits)) for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:55:17 +0100 Message-ID: <50C6D8D3.9020106@ose.nl> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:55:15 +0100 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update mergemaster options References: <612DB7D4-07CA-4C48-98F8-081C33E85812@develooper.com> In-Reply-To: <612DB7D4-07CA-4C48-98F8-081C33E85812@develooper.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 06:55:20 -0000 On 12/11/2012 12:58 AM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: > Hi, > > On an 8.2 box, I run > > freebsd-update -r 8.3-RELEASE upgrade > > I am getting hundreds of files with "conflicts" like: > > <<<<<<< current version > # $FreeBSD: src/etc/auth.conf,v 1.6.32.1.4.1 2010/06/14 02:09:06 kensmith Exp $ > ======= > # $FreeBSD: src/etc/auth.conf,v 1.6.32.1.8.1 2012/03/03 06:15:13 kensmith Exp $ I don't know why this happens. Upgrading a couple of boxes from 8.1-RELEASE to 8.3-RELEASE did not give me these conflicts. As far as I know freebsd-update does not use mergemaster.rc, just freebsd-update.conf It might be the case that you have upgraded from source before on this machine that causes this situation? >>>>>>>> 8.3-RELEASE > ... which is just tremendously unhelpful. I'm using the default freebsd-update configuration. Per an old mail from the archives I made sure I have /etc/mergemaster.rc setup as below, but it doesn't seem to make a difference. > > Any ideas? In the past I've just given up on using freebsd-update and gone back to manually compiling and installing world, but for this box I'd really like not to. > > > Ask > > $ cat /etc/mergemaster.rc > # Automatically install files that do not exist > AUTO_INSTALL='yes' > # Automatically upgrade files that have not been edited > AUTO_UPGRADE='yes' > # Ignore files that I don't want changed > IGNORE_FILES='/etc/motd' > # Do not display changes that only affect whitespace > DIFF_FLAG="'.Bub'" > # Ignore CVS id lines to stop replacing files where only that line has changed > DIFF_OPTIONS='-I$FreeBSD:.*[$]' From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 07:03:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8866104 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:03:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCAA8FC08 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:03:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id s9so13803771iec.13 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:03:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=4bwArd87RAbcpzT1ofjniqJWBgJmyIRq1qJdfYJ2OdA=; b=B9DLkxA+GjwWpOb6af1j6KkYkDMqpF1BzZZ4F6V4kB3ZcitKId368TARi2cjqXjHpP BHVLf9NNu1pTv9Hm9NgA7m8bHLrYufCfqQWdAWWwRx2gwsKGPwexMPX+fJS8f712BhDW 6rw7urGZNr2V7PKzVeGV2llQDl4eelhxPSrdtCQtxxbpm3mIcWWJqYlCz791ucL1GQkr aUXpglDI/Ktjl/2SVsQ+t5Eo1x6NPXduxy2hbIkThKlzkANAbB8S05bzf7N4r0s59X8e RWv//9AYKu+LE2Q758BqmtSpzS0dAmgPKn0vziCKbZkvltCL0Bs1bPmEtPxWYI4GIcwK iI7w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.63.4 with SMTP id a4mr13110470ici.40.1355209406712; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:03:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.30.11 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:03:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <28991355150396@web18f.yandex.ru> References: <28991355150396@web18f.yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 02:03:26 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to update ports tree indexes when using svn From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "S.N.Grigoriev" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:03:32 -0000 On 10 December 2012 09:39, S.N.Grigoriev wrote: > Hi list, > > after the security announcement (http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html) I use svn to update my local ports tree. I've found out that the port index is not updated. What is the preferred/recommended way to update port indexes when using svn? > make index does take a good 20 minutes on a dual core machine, but it's not strictly needed, as pkg_version -vl"<" (or pkg version -vl"<" if you're using the new pkg system) work well, albeit more slowly than if they had an index (as in pkg_version -vIl"<") portmaster doesn't require an index to update stuff. I can't remember if portupgrade does. The index can be [re]built at your leisure while other things are going on (such as rebuilding out-of-date ports), if you don't mind the additional CPU & IO load. -- -- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 07:11:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910FC564 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:11:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200528FC1B for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:11:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Footer: b3NlLm5s Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits)) for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:11:35 +0100 Message-ID: <50C6DCA5.8070505@ose.nl> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:11:33 +0100 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> In-Reply-To: <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:11:37 -0000 On 12/10/2012 06:34 PM, Brett Glass wrote: > At 03:41 PM 12/9/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> I'll amend my "stuff that will help" list: >> >> * Donate to the freebsd foundation, along with opening discussions to >> them about how your organisation uses / relies upon freebsd; I just had a little conversation with my employer about donating to the FreeBSD Foundation and sent the three *most important* people in the organization a follow up mail on it with the link of course. Let's see what happens. Maybe they will take it out of our Christmas gift :) Thanks! From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 07:15:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C666C88B; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:15:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (freebsd-stable.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:3::6502:9b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4178FC15; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:15:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBB7FXEZ017274; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:15:33 GMT (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: (from tinderbox@localhost) by freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qBB7FXlR017273; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:15:33 GMT (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:15:33 GMT Message-Id: <201212110715.qBB7FXlR017273@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca> X-Authentication-Warning: freebsd-stable.sentex.ca: tinderbox set sender to FreeBSD Tinderbox using -f Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Subject: [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc Precedence: bulk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:15:33 -0000 TB --- 2012-12-11 05:45:11 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-12-11 05:45:11 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtancsa@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2012-12-11 05:45:11 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2012-12-11 05:45:11 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-12-11 05:45:11 - checking out /src from svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9 TB --- 2012-12-11 05:45:11 - cd /tinderbox/RELENG_9/powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2012-12-11 05:45:11 - /usr/local/bin/svn cleanup /src TB --- 2012-12-11 05:45:54 - /usr/local/bin/svn update /src TB --- 2012-12-11 05:46:01 - At svn revision 244110 TB --- 2012-12-11 05:46:02 - building world TB --- 2012-12-11 05:46:02 - CROSS_BUILD_TESTING=YES TB --- 2012-12-11 05:46:02 - MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/obj TB --- 2012-12-11 05:46:02 - PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/sbin TB --- 2012-12-11 05:46:02 - SRCCONF=/dev/null TB --- 2012-12-11 05:46:02 - TARGET=powerpc TB --- 2012-12-11 05:46:02 - TARGET_ARCH=powerpc TB --- 2012-12-11 05:46:02 - TZ=UTC TB --- 2012-12-11 05:46:02 - __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null TB --- 2012-12-11 05:46:02 - cd /src TB --- 2012-12-11 05:46:02 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> World build started on Tue Dec 11 05:46:03 UTC 2012 >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything [...] ===> bin/expr (all) cc -O2 -pipe -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wunused-parameter -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -Wold-style-definition -Wno-pointer-sign -c expr.c cc1: warnings being treated as errors /src/bin/expr/expr.y: In function 'main': /src/bin/expr/expr.y:291: warning: implicit declaration of function 'yyparse' /src/bin/expr/expr.y:291: warning: nested extern declaration of 'yyparse' expr.c: At top level: expr.c:813: warning: no previous prototype for 'yyparse' *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/bin/expr. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/bin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. TB --- 2012-12-11 07:15:32 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2012-12-11 07:15:32 - ERROR: failed to build world TB --- 2012-12-11 07:15:32 - 4486.55 user 567.66 system 5421.44 real http://tinderbox.freebsd.org/tinderbox-releng_9-RELENG_9-powerpc-powerpc.full From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 07:24:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4EE4D49; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:24:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (freebsd-stable.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:3::6502:9b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D1F8FC1F; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBB7Od0G078748; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:24:39 GMT (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: (from tinderbox@localhost) by freebsd-stable.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qBB7Ocre078741; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:24:39 GMT (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:24:39 GMT Message-Id: <201212110724.qBB7Ocre078741@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca> X-Authentication-Warning: freebsd-stable.sentex.ca: tinderbox set sender to FreeBSD Tinderbox using -f Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Subject: [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc Precedence: bulk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 07:24:39 -0000 TB --- 2012-12-11 05:56:44 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-12-11 05:56:44 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtancsa@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2012-12-11 05:56:44 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2012-12-11 05:56:44 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-12-11 05:56:44 - checking out /src from svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9 TB --- 2012-12-11 05:56:44 - cd /tinderbox/RELENG_9/powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2012-12-11 05:56:44 - /usr/local/bin/svn cleanup /src TB --- 2012-12-11 05:57:32 - /usr/local/bin/svn update /src TB --- 2012-12-11 05:57:41 - At svn revision 244110 TB --- 2012-12-11 05:57:42 - building world TB --- 2012-12-11 05:57:42 - CROSS_BUILD_TESTING=YES TB --- 2012-12-11 05:57:42 - MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/obj TB --- 2012-12-11 05:57:42 - PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/sbin TB --- 2012-12-11 05:57:42 - SRCCONF=/dev/null TB --- 2012-12-11 05:57:42 - TARGET=powerpc TB --- 2012-12-11 05:57:42 - TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64 TB --- 2012-12-11 05:57:42 - TZ=UTC TB --- 2012-12-11 05:57:42 - __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null TB --- 2012-12-11 05:57:42 - cd /src TB --- 2012-12-11 05:57:42 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> World build started on Tue Dec 11 05:57:43 UTC 2012 >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything [...] ===> bin/expr (all) cc -O2 -pipe -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wunused-parameter -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -Wold-style-definition -Wno-pointer-sign -c expr.c cc1: warnings being treated as errors /src/bin/expr/expr.y: In function 'main': /src/bin/expr/expr.y:291: warning: implicit declaration of function 'yyparse' /src/bin/expr/expr.y:291: warning: nested extern declaration of 'yyparse' expr.c: At top level: expr.c:813: warning: no previous prototype for 'yyparse' *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/bin/expr. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/bin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src. TB --- 2012-12-11 07:24:38 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2012-12-11 07:24:38 - ERROR: failed to build world TB --- 2012-12-11 07:24:38 - 4396.00 user 556.35 system 5274.38 real http://tinderbox.freebsd.org/tinderbox-releng_9-RELENG_9-powerpc64-powerpc.full From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 09:32:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7648777E for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:32:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrei693@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB418FC1B for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:32:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id go10so3486736lbb.13 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 01:32:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lLlMBf5W4jiQlxZo6gARPyF7192xwGKIC+h4qzSIUMQ=; b=SHzFWz4WXJrNdQzqoGZhq5EfWQpBa+qdrPUhVvODEoNag2nHNd78SbY0gZPsuHoRMX YUWoRLLUgEgDoiomES8Nv9euv1eUKRQnz3VPauDsTYC3o9S+BPky+dO28ndbPinrRvyt PwL9+4U5ypXpbifJVJgAj+FEQ94xYKl5pmUaLbx59ZkLU/mCpYoURwevz1mcg8k7pVf4 jWKShLPJ7Joy23EOmSL0/2BtGki11FdYc3NUXdvO0n5FOkaQR8Y0x9naE+y/82cGDkFj CLPt2C6LqQGY9awDwDeiIe45HI9uERvSDynUpkG/84BSKIjadS51xEJSZ/7FaOxpfrR2 qedQ== Received: by 10.152.125.7 with SMTP id mm7mr16889193lab.2.1355218327310; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 01:32:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([87.213.55.5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v7sm7836696lbj.13.2012.12.11.01.32.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 01:32:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50C6FD8C.7080804@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:31:56 +0100 From: Andrei Brezan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to update ports tree indexes when using svn References: <28991355150396@web18f.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:32:09 -0000 On 12/10/2012 4:50 PM, Ronald Klop wrote: > On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:39:56 +0100, S.N.Grigoriev > wrote: > >> Hi list, >> >> after the security announcement >> (http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html) I use svn to >> update my local ports tree. I've found out that the port index is not >> updated. What is the preferred/recommended way to update port indexes >> when using svn? > > Unless you are a ports committer I recommend you use portsnap to > update your ports tree. It takes care of the INDEX file too. > > Ronald. > _______________________________________________ > One reason to use svn over portsnap would be that you can do a port downgrade if needed. Before we had ports-mgmt/portdowngrade for this but that relies on CVS which is no longer supported. Maybe there's another way that I'm missing. -- Andrei From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 10:36:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1CE46C for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:36:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EA48FC14 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:36:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.104.138]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TiNCc-0002NP-RD for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:36:43 +0100 Received: from [81.21.138.17] (helo=ronaldradial.versatec.local) by smtp.greenhost.nl with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TiNCc-0007K1-Mk for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:36:42 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> <201212102352.QAA09737@lariat.net> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:36:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.11 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net X-Spam-Level: / X-Spam-Score: 0.8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Scan-Signature: 9b84bad32751a42de3aa9e7877f1ca86 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:36:47 -0000 On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:06:24 +0100, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Brett Glass wrote: >> At 04:29 PM 12/10/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> >>> There's politics in every organisation. There are ego clashes in every >>> organisation. Sometimes you'll fit in, sometimes you won't. If you >>> feel there are issues, find people inside the community who you do get >>> along well with and talk with them about it. >>> >>> It sucks, yes. I'm one of those "shut up and code already" types and I >>> deal badly with politics. >> >> >> Me, too. That's why I have been contributing code quietly through others >> rather than putting myself out in the front lines. >> >> In any event -- back to the original topic -- there should indeed be >> better >> communications between the Release Engineering team and the community. >> The time it takes to post updates -- especially as it gets close to >> release >> time -- would be recovered many times over because folks like me >> wouldn't >> have any need to e-mail regarding status and projected schedules. ;-) > > I whole-heatedly agree... but I know a little about release > engineering for a large project, especially when the release team is > unpaid and has to honor commitments to $real_job. Release engineering > is very detail-oriented and unforgiving. This is not really > compatible with part-time work. > > The RE must be focused, first ans foremost, on getting a release out > the door as quickly as possible and not to have any serious problems > with that release. This makes it very had to pull bakc and make > announcements or even update posted schedules. That is made even worse > by hte desire to make such communication accurate or at least useful. > Since there is a LOT of guessing involved in pulling together a > release (how long will "Joe" take to fix this problem or why are there > half a dozen reports of a serious issue with the RC, when no one else > can reproduce it or even figure out what part of the system is causing > it), RE folks are usually reticent about trying to give out any > information since it will most likely be inaccurate. > > This is why I accept the line that it will be released when it is > ready. I really think it's about ready, but not even the head of the > 9.1 RE team KNOWS when it will be ready, even if the ISO builds are > started. "There is many a slip twixt the cup and the lip." Then they can communicate they don't know a date. People accept hearing: 'because of unforeseen problems the expected date is unknown' in stead of '2012-10-29' (http://wiki.freebsd.org/Releng/9.1TODO). Not knowing something is not an excuse for not communicating. Ronald. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 10:57:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38606948; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:57:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1A28FC08; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:57:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8270F2842A; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:51:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [89.177.49.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9040F28427; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:51:08 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50C7101B.2020702@quip.cz> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:51:07 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> <201212102352.QAA09737@lariat.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Brett Glass , Adrian Chadd , stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:57:37 -0000 Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Brett Glass wrote: >> At 04:29 PM 12/10/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: [...] > This is why I accept the line that it will be released when it is > ready. I really think it's about ready, but not even the head of the > 9.1 RE team KNOWS when it will be ready, even if the ISO builds are > started. "There is many a slip twixt the cup and the lip." ISOs are on FTP site today (with date of 2012-12-04, but yesterday there were none) Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 14:00:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B360992; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:00:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpalmer@freebsd.org) Received: from noop.in-addr.com (mail.in-addr.com [IPv6:2001:470:8:162::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC55A8FC18; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:00:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gjp by noop.in-addr.com with local (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1TiQO3-000KqF-8B; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:00:43 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:00:43 -0500 From: Gary Palmer To: Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? Message-ID: <20121211140043.GB20011@in-addr.com> References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> <201212102352.QAA09737@lariat.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gpalmer@freebsd.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on noop.in-addr.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: Brett Glass , Adrian Chadd , stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:00:57 -0000 On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 08:06:24PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Brett Glass wrote: > > At 04:29 PM 12/10/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > >> There's politics in every organisation. There are ego clashes in every > >> organisation. Sometimes you'll fit in, sometimes you won't. If you > >> feel there are issues, find people inside the community who you do get > >> along well with and talk with them about it. > >> > >> It sucks, yes. I'm one of those "shut up and code already" types and I > >> deal badly with politics. > > > > > > Me, too. That's why I have been contributing code quietly through others > > rather than putting myself out in the front lines. > > > > In any event -- back to the original topic -- there should indeed be better > > communications between the Release Engineering team and the community. > > The time it takes to post updates -- especially as it gets close to release > > time -- would be recovered many times over because folks like me wouldn't > > have any need to e-mail regarding status and projected schedules. ;-) > > I whole-heatedly agree... but I know a little about release > engineering for a large project, especially when the release team is > unpaid and has to honor commitments to $real_job. Release engineering > is very detail-oriented and unforgiving. This is not really > compatible with part-time work. > > The RE must be focused, first ans foremost, on getting a release out > the door as quickly as possible and not to have any serious problems > with that release. This makes it very had to pull bakc and make > announcements or even update posted schedules. That is made even worse > by hte desire to make such communication accurate or at least useful. > Since there is a LOT of guessing involved in pulling together a > release (how long will "Joe" take to fix this problem or why are there > half a dozen reports of a serious issue with the RC, when no one else > can reproduce it or even figure out what part of the system is causing > it), RE folks are usually reticent about trying to give out any > information since it will most likely be inaccurate. > > This is why I accept the line that it will be released when it is > ready. I really think it's about ready, but not even the head of the > 9.1 RE team KNOWS when it will be ready, even if the ISO builds are > started. "There is many a slip twixt the cup and the lip." I don't remember seeing any updates in e-mail, but the http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html url has been updated. Its a litle out of date now (last update about 2 weeks ago), but it does include information on the release of 9.1 and what is holding it up (specifically getting a minimal set of packages built). With the 2 branches tagged (ports and src) it is likely still a matter of getting stuff built in a known clean environment. Gary From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 14:27:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0D7A20 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:27:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xenophon+freebsd@irtnog.org) Received: from mx1.irtnog.org (bge0-1.edge1.cincinnati.irtnog.org [IPv6:2001:470:c445::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC948FC0C for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:27:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cinep001bsdgw.irtnog.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.irtnog.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8D0144BB for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:27:12 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at irtnog.org Received: from mx1.irtnog.org ([127.0.0.1]) by cinep001bsdgw.irtnog.net (mx1.irtnog.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RTBULdP8iyJN for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:27:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from cinip100ntsbs.irtnog.net (irtnog.net [10.63.1.100]) by mx1.irtnog.org (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:27:04 -0500 (EST) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Custom Kernel for FreeBSD Installation X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:26:03 -0500 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Custom Kernel for FreeBSD Installation Thread-Index: Ac3Xq3NZQ6Yr7t83SgGOq/XeLG2Rsw== From: "xenophon\\+freebsd" To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:27:21 -0000 How do I go about replacing the kernel on the FreeBSD installation CDs? I assume it's as simple as replacing the relevant files in the ISO image, and that if I look at "make release", I can figure out how the CD image gets generated.=20 I'm trying to install FreeBSD onto a HP ProLiant DL380 G3 with a Smart Array 5i controller, for use as a file server. Rather than use Smart Array's RAID features, I want to use ZFS's RAID-Z1/Z2, so I have configured 18 RAID-0 volumes, each consisting of a single drive attached to the Smart Array controller. This totals 18 drives, so at boot time, the ciss(4) driver logs the following error: ciss0: port 0x3000-0x30ff mem 0xf05c0000-0xf05fffff,0xf04f0000-0xf04f3fff irq 10 at device 3.0 on pci1 ciss0: PERFORMANT Transport ciss0: adapter claims to report absurd number of logical drives (18 > 15) device_attach: ciss0 attach returned 6=09 According to Paul Saab (http://lserinol.blogspot.com/2012/03/freebsd-ciss-driver-logical-drive- limit.html), the constant CISS_MAX_LOGICAL limits the amount of memory used by the driver for DMA by default. Best wishes, Matthew --=20 I FIGHT FOR THE USERS From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 16:18:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CE0643 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:18:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nonesuch@longcount.org) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B403E8FC12 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:18:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id fo14so4979642vcb.13 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:18:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=k7lqM8hmncN5L1QvdL1+tgEtMGShMjhbmTDz+NbO/8g=; b=hpm/pMwg0BSf8fsOs1FCYW4cdYpuw7rXg1eMA3sFuHDDeDlwDnpmc7cY5Azq6XLnvA N7Yk1Jf5IZ1yBThcdpjqnIZARDwgBYvzEBNF/vF0gWE3Z7EWyJ2Dc1vFiOjyst8Mn76d 4AjkNS9AMQVirGXvWvN6y08WPqZfjgFk0rO/Fc11edmNbXSGdo/cILD7qo4jhHVGNWjT +r+mkmoZzAxQaGeaGKCcohylApQJXMOWezm2QM+rtA3Pt7a7j+GGzRTAEvYuu+1G5U/M Eprgzi4WoccO01L2/Tajm8GtFSalSKhGXt/mtjTAuV+R5RftCqKDEx8ghJbDixtzSrTg lQ/g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.92.144 with SMTP id cm16mr9997541vdb.36.1355242724880; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:18:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.210.34 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:18:44 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [209.66.78.50] In-Reply-To: <20121211140043.GB20011@in-addr.com> References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> <201212102352.QAA09737@lariat.net> <20121211140043.GB20011@in-addr.com> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:18:44 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? From: Mark Saad To: Gary Palmer X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkmZpnAIgwrotU2mps00CVe4BkuwWmnCT3Uua4uZxS6rV+E74A3o3ZBpSdwCb9ZzzLc1GyY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Brett Glass , Adrian Chadd , stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:18:46 -0000 So what is the short summary ? From what I can see, the wiki is out of date again. the ISO are on the master server, and working out to the mirrors. FreeBSD update is still not updated. Does someone just need to just update the wiki with the relevant info ? On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Gary Palmer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 08:06:24PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Brett Glass wrote: > > > At 04:29 PM 12/10/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > > > >> There's politics in every organisation. There are ego clashes in every > > >> organisation. Sometimes you'll fit in, sometimes you won't. If you > > >> feel there are issues, find people inside the community who you do get > > >> along well with and talk with them about it. > > >> > > >> It sucks, yes. I'm one of those "shut up and code already" types and I > > >> deal badly with politics. > > > > > > > > > Me, too. That's why I have been contributing code quietly through > others > > > rather than putting myself out in the front lines. > > > > > > In any event -- back to the original topic -- there should indeed be > better > > > communications between the Release Engineering team and the community. > > > The time it takes to post updates -- especially as it gets close to > release > > > time -- would be recovered many times over because folks like me > wouldn't > > > have any need to e-mail regarding status and projected schedules. ;-) > > > > I whole-heatedly agree... but I know a little about release > > engineering for a large project, especially when the release team is > > unpaid and has to honor commitments to $real_job. Release engineering > > is very detail-oriented and unforgiving. This is not really > > compatible with part-time work. > > > > The RE must be focused, first ans foremost, on getting a release out > > the door as quickly as possible and not to have any serious problems > > with that release. This makes it very had to pull bakc and make > > announcements or even update posted schedules. That is made even worse > > by hte desire to make such communication accurate or at least useful. > > Since there is a LOT of guessing involved in pulling together a > > release (how long will "Joe" take to fix this problem or why are there > > half a dozen reports of a serious issue with the RC, when no one else > > can reproduce it or even figure out what part of the system is causing > > it), RE folks are usually reticent about trying to give out any > > information since it will most likely be inaccurate. > > > > This is why I accept the line that it will be released when it is > > ready. I really think it's about ready, but not even the head of the > > 9.1 RE team KNOWS when it will be ready, even if the ISO builds are > > started. "There is many a slip twixt the cup and the lip." > > I don't remember seeing any updates in e-mail, but the > > http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html > > url has been updated. Its a litle out of date now (last update about 2 > weeks ago), but it does include information on the release of 9.1 and what > is holding it up (specifically getting a minimal set of packages built). > With the 2 branches tagged (ports and src) it is likely still a matter > of getting stuff built in a known clean environment. > > Gary > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- mark saad | nonesuch@longcount.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 16:35:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C74E62 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:35:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rainer@ultra-secure.de) Received: from mail.ultra-secure.de (mail.ultra-secure.de [78.47.114.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464818FC0C for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:35:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25878 invoked by uid 89); 11 Dec 2012 16:32:34 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 25873, pid: 25875, t: 0.0608s scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.97.3/m:54/d:15721 Received: from unknown (HELO suse3) (rainer@ultra-secure.de@212.71.117.1) by mail.ultra-secure.de with ESMTPA; 11 Dec 2012 16:32:34 -0000 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:32:34 +0100 From: Rainer Duffner To: Mark Saad Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? Message-ID: <20121211173234.260bf5b8@suse3> In-Reply-To: References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> <201212102352.QAA09737@lariat.net> <20121211140043.GB20011@in-addr.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Brett Glass , Adrian Chadd , stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:35:03 -0000 Am Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:18:44 -0500 schrieb Mark Saad : > So what is the short summary ? From what I can see, the wiki is out > of date again. the ISO are on the master server, and working out to > the mirrors. FreeBSD update is still not updated. Does someone just > need to just update the wiki with the relevant info ? =46rom my experience, it usually takes a couple of days from uploading the ISOs to the official announcement. I don't think it makes sense anymore to update the wiki now. For the future, I also suggest not to make a timeline or a public schedule at all. It will stop people from making assumptions and plans for their rollouts that more often than not just turn out to be unrealistic. I myself actually anticipated a October/November-ish release-date when I saw the first schedule...and even that turned out to be too optimistic. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 16:38:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0DCFBC for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:38:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61DBE8FC0C for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:38:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.104.138]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TiSqT-0007ck-Qt for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:38:14 +0100 Received: from [81.21.138.17] (helo=ronaldradial.versatec.local) by smtp.greenhost.nl with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TiSqT-0004ta-NG for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:38:13 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> <201212102352.QAA09737@lariat.net> <20121211140043.GB20011@in-addr.com> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:38:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.11 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net X-Spam-Level: / X-Spam-Score: 0.8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Scan-Signature: aadb025e1561638fa3cfee7b14734d3b X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:38:23 -0000 On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:18:44 +0100, Mark Saad wrote: > So what is the short summary ? The short summary is that nobody knows. The people who can know anything don't say much more than "it's ready when it's ready" and the rest of the people guess from information from various e-mails and other sources which reliability can be doubted. And the last few days people are saying that you have to donate to the freebsd foundation if you want a release or better information. ;-) Ronald. > From what I can see, the wiki is out of date > again. the ISO are on the master server, and working out to the mirrors. > FreeBSD update is still not updated. Does someone just need to just > update > the wiki with the relevant info ? > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Gary Palmer wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 08:06:24PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Brett Glass wrote: >> > > At 04:29 PM 12/10/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> > > >> > >> There's politics in every organisation. There are ego clashes in >> every >> > >> organisation. Sometimes you'll fit in, sometimes you won't. If you >> > >> feel there are issues, find people inside the community who you do >> get >> > >> along well with and talk with them about it. >> > >> >> > >> It sucks, yes. I'm one of those "shut up and code already" types >> and I >> > >> deal badly with politics. >> > > >> > > >> > > Me, too. That's why I have been contributing code quietly through >> others >> > > rather than putting myself out in the front lines. >> > > >> > > In any event -- back to the original topic -- there should indeed be >> better >> > > communications between the Release Engineering team and the >> community. >> > > The time it takes to post updates -- especially as it gets close to >> release >> > > time -- would be recovered many times over because folks like me >> wouldn't >> > > have any need to e-mail regarding status and projected schedules. >> ;-) >> > >> > I whole-heatedly agree... but I know a little about release >> > engineering for a large project, especially when the release team is >> > unpaid and has to honor commitments to $real_job. Release engineering >> > is very detail-oriented and unforgiving. This is not really >> > compatible with part-time work. >> > >> > The RE must be focused, first ans foremost, on getting a release out >> > the door as quickly as possible and not to have any serious problems >> > with that release. This makes it very had to pull bakc and make >> > announcements or even update posted schedules. That is made even worse >> > by hte desire to make such communication accurate or at least useful. >> > Since there is a LOT of guessing involved in pulling together a >> > release (how long will "Joe" take to fix this problem or why are there >> > half a dozen reports of a serious issue with the RC, when no one else >> > can reproduce it or even figure out what part of the system is causing >> > it), RE folks are usually reticent about trying to give out any >> > information since it will most likely be inaccurate. >> > >> > This is why I accept the line that it will be released when it is >> > ready. I really think it's about ready, but not even the head of the >> > 9.1 RE team KNOWS when it will be ready, even if the ISO builds are >> > started. "There is many a slip twixt the cup and the lip." >> >> I don't remember seeing any updates in e-mail, but the >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html >> >> url has been updated. Its a litle out of date now (last update about 2 >> weeks ago), but it does include information on the release of 9.1 and >> what >> is holding it up (specifically getting a minimal set of packages built). >> With the 2 branches tagged (ports and src) it is likely still a matter >> of getting stuff built in a known clean environment. >> >> Gary >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 16:44:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5124F3A9 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:44:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF05C8FC08 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:44:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.104.138]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TiSwl-0007sD-SP for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:44:44 +0100 Received: from [81.21.138.17] (helo=ronaldradial.versatec.local) by smtp.greenhost.nl with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TiSwl-00055h-OX for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:44:43 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> <201212102352.QAA09737@lariat.net> <20121211140043.GB20011@in-addr.com> <20121211173234.260bf5b8@suse3> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:44:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20121211173234.260bf5b8@suse3> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.11 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net X-Spam-Level: / X-Spam-Score: 0.8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Scan-Signature: 4052b6d1c9976086d5ab5ce040fcf5b8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:44:47 -0000 On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:32:34 +0100, Rainer Duffner wrote: > Am Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:18:44 -0500 > schrieb Mark Saad : > >> So what is the short summary ? From what I can see, the wiki is out >> of date again. the ISO are on the master server, and working out to >> the mirrors. FreeBSD update is still not updated. Does someone just >> need to just update the wiki with the relevant info ? > > > From my experience, it usually takes a couple of days from uploading > the ISOs to the official announcement. > > I don't think it makes sense anymore to update the wiki now. > > For the future, I also suggest not to make a timeline or a public > schedule at all. > It will stop people from making assumptions and plans for their > rollouts that more often than not just turn out to be unrealistic. > I myself actually anticipated a October/November-ish release-date when I > saw the first schedule...and even that turned out to be too optimistic. I suggest to make a timeline AND communicate what is happening _now_. Some small official statement from the release team now and then would make a large difference. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 16:50:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D9668D for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:50:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@c0mplx.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656F28FC1E for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:50:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1TiT2h-000KHe-BM for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:50:51 +0100 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:50:51 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? Message-ID: <20121211165051.GV12114@home.opsec.eu> References: <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> <201212102352.QAA09737@lariat.net> <20121211140043.GB20011@in-addr.com> <20121211173234.260bf5b8@suse3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121211173234.260bf5b8@suse3> X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:50:52 -0000 Hello, > For the future, I also suggest not to make a timeline or a public > schedule at all. That seems to be a very bad idea, it will invite the usual freebsd-is-dead crowd. > It will stop people from making assumptions and plans for their > rollouts that more often than not just turn out to be unrealistic. > I myself actually anticipated a October/November-ish release-date when I > saw the first schedule...and even that turned out to be too optimistic. The last few years it was always shortly after x-mas 8-} -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 8 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 17:13:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84832E27 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:13:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fonz@skysmurf.nl) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [82.95.125.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28848FC08 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBBHDZg0099194; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:13:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fonz@spectrum.skysmurf.nl) Received: (from fonz@localhost) by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id qBBHDZQa099193; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:13:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fonz) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:13:35 +0100 From: "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" To: Kurt Jaeger Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? Message-ID: <20121211171335.GA99166@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> References: <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> <201212102352.QAA09737@lariat.net> <20121211140043.GB20011@in-addr.com> <20121211173234.260bf5b8@suse3> <20121211165051.GV12114@home.opsec.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121211165051.GV12114@home.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/pgp/fonz.asc Cc: stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:13:49 -0000 --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kurt Jaeger wrote: > The last few years it was always shortly after x-mas 8-} Christmas comes early this year: there hasn't been an official announce- ment yet and perhaps not all mirrors have synced yet, but I've seen the ISOs on the NL mirror, so it looks like 9.1-RELEASE is out now. AvW --=20 Obsig: developing a new sig --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQx2m/AAoJEAfP7gJTaCe8NPsP/1aqVquvGig1jYHEvglZ01hC H0cSfkbrFYsEL6uBZELsvo0VDMN30w2o0Ne3ttZBK4Nb8vdrHHulUCT/ah66Ufvp YUbbP0NqefImZsq8eCVZN3QBJPqPhH3qBuAxRRPG18/9akLdo6r6/+ecOWTxje1c aUDsDcckSkGQ2dGz5r/M36lacyu2jnoqGwHht7v4Uue9MuniQMXnEk4M4Zik5Cks gInqF/FP+Dqo7GCTYLtFRjYxpbTQzSkHTwSjwEateqjhJj5nUMN6Av8bICLnM16E iXwBQewjTucutIjeGCNYlCjFQ6MNoA8bpDmQfhjq7YEOi3RWZW2MFJbsucosUCXU 0BIa2+EYwbzpbagq3suJe8bbsR9IRRfryv9mouBdEFhrD3kLJqEZODb4f4tUWOWl 5cNSpROBQBr+RabFPz1Ssdzhbv6JTPYMF7RelBnwYMzX9M0YjEi+xOT3YhfiOK+v Yn0tC4QGyanrBJB6eQFfE1fz2C6BKpI31XFmlEvgmwx4qHxM64KrBBSKTe4rGAP0 5swIXsp90F+UiucNKl014T7vmVscVDXNZh1H6fIVs2mN7E4HiO10/CXJIue7Lqkn 3o+znXrx1OgkBKHYsWWHih36Wb3mvo6PocesgMneh/TwUR26vTIfNy0zdSqRl12V GJyPWvajnf9Hi6ON/nUf =Ia3t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 17:56:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A63A7A50 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:56:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@c0mplx.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5937F8FC19 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:56:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1TiU3j-000LJ6-Mh for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:55:59 +0100 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:55:59 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? Message-ID: <20121211175559.GW12114@home.opsec.eu> References: <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> <201212102352.QAA09737@lariat.net> <20121211140043.GB20011@in-addr.com> <20121211173234.260bf5b8@suse3> <20121211165051.GV12114@home.opsec.eu> <20121211171335.GA99166@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121211171335.GA99166@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:56:01 -0000 Hi! > > The last few years it was always shortly after x-mas 8-} > > Christmas comes early this year: there hasn't been an official announce- > ment yet So, as every year: be patient, wait for the official release announcement, it still might change due to some last-minute bug. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 8 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 18:00:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9C4C61; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:00:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpalmer@freebsd.org) Received: from noop.in-addr.com (mail.in-addr.com [IPv6:2001:470:8:162::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E29F8FC19; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gjp by noop.in-addr.com with local (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1TiU7w-000LEt-9R; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:00:20 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:00:20 -0500 From: Gary Palmer To: Mark Saad Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? Message-ID: <20121211180020.GC20011@in-addr.com> References: <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> <201212102352.QAA09737@lariat.net> <20121211140043.GB20011@in-addr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gpalmer@freebsd.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on noop.in-addr.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: Brett Glass , Adrian Chadd , stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:00:33 -0000 Short summary: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-December/071023.html On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:18:44AM -0500, Mark Saad wrote: > So what is the short summary ? From what I can see, the wiki is out of date > again. the ISO are on the master server, and working out to the mirrors. > FreeBSD update is still not updated. Does someone just need to just update > the wiki with the relevant info ? > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Gary Palmer wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 08:06:24PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Brett Glass wrote: > > > > At 04:29 PM 12/10/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > > > > > >> There's politics in every organisation. There are ego clashes in every > > > >> organisation. Sometimes you'll fit in, sometimes you won't. If you > > > >> feel there are issues, find people inside the community who you do get > > > >> along well with and talk with them about it. > > > >> > > > >> It sucks, yes. I'm one of those "shut up and code already" types and I > > > >> deal badly with politics. > > > > > > > > > > > > Me, too. That's why I have been contributing code quietly through > > others > > > > rather than putting myself out in the front lines. > > > > > > > > In any event -- back to the original topic -- there should indeed be > > better > > > > communications between the Release Engineering team and the community. > > > > The time it takes to post updates -- especially as it gets close to > > release > > > > time -- would be recovered many times over because folks like me > > wouldn't > > > > have any need to e-mail regarding status and projected schedules. ;-) > > > > > > I whole-heatedly agree... but I know a little about release > > > engineering for a large project, especially when the release team is > > > unpaid and has to honor commitments to $real_job. Release engineering > > > is very detail-oriented and unforgiving. This is not really > > > compatible with part-time work. > > > > > > The RE must be focused, first ans foremost, on getting a release out > > > the door as quickly as possible and not to have any serious problems > > > with that release. This makes it very had to pull bakc and make > > > announcements or even update posted schedules. That is made even worse > > > by hte desire to make such communication accurate or at least useful. > > > Since there is a LOT of guessing involved in pulling together a > > > release (how long will "Joe" take to fix this problem or why are there > > > half a dozen reports of a serious issue with the RC, when no one else > > > can reproduce it or even figure out what part of the system is causing > > > it), RE folks are usually reticent about trying to give out any > > > information since it will most likely be inaccurate. > > > > > > This is why I accept the line that it will be released when it is > > > ready. I really think it's about ready, but not even the head of the > > > 9.1 RE team KNOWS when it will be ready, even if the ISO builds are > > > started. "There is many a slip twixt the cup and the lip." > > > > I don't remember seeing any updates in e-mail, but the > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html > > > > url has been updated. Its a litle out of date now (last update about 2 > > weeks ago), but it does include information on the release of 9.1 and what > > is holding it up (specifically getting a minimal set of packages built). > > With the 2 branches tagged (ports and src) it is likely still a matter > > of getting stuff built in a known clean environment. > > > > Gary > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > -- > mark saad | nonesuch@longcount.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 18:00:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC9FC6C for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:00:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fonz@skysmurf.nl) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [82.95.125.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903848FC16 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBBI0ZP1099316; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:00:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fonz@spectrum.skysmurf.nl) Received: (from fonz@localhost) by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id qBBI0Z6l099315; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:00:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fonz) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:00:35 +0100 From: "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" To: Kurt Jaeger Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? Message-ID: <20121211180035.GA99287@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> References: <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> <201212102352.QAA09737@lariat.net> <20121211140043.GB20011@in-addr.com> <20121211173234.260bf5b8@suse3> <20121211165051.GV12114@home.opsec.eu> <20121211171335.GA99166@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> <20121211175559.GW12114@home.opsec.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121211175559.GW12114@home.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/pgp/fonz.asc Cc: stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:00:39 -0000 --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > Christmas comes early this year: there hasn't been an official > > announcement yet >=20 > So, as every year: be patient, wait for the official release announcement, > it still might change due to some last-minute bug. True. But it still looks like an early Christmas ;-) I doubt it will be two weeks before the announcement comes. AvW --=20 Obsig: developing a new sig --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQx3TDAAoJEAfP7gJTaCe8Go4P/0uWT7tznOfy1fkKwzB3VuGQ yvGbIe9PEzcNU/LRAJQ5BHduWf8m4X2sgkatHG1Us98+8NpgLZYT7fQFYxtbvloV lq59Tw9pZ16woiDt5IGgrWpnq+LlAgAK4CEgybbh+baIchE6tRJLVZyvEYFh6lfG W9HLIBSZa4g4BQyah6hIt2mXuHrKLuzM2wbJD0EtIOr0wsXKnTZZFVfKvMc2yBFj 1QwvZsuP7FNrGv3jhs5k7G0/+tUA8yDVjMctpvhSNcNJ6Wk4bRA0J6Rn9r1xKAgs JMqcjQrBBSxoX0zfyJ9taMOwDpUVcg2nzJxMGN7JYhBz/V4MiXyS8lqiC3fxOLSX IH3Rpf8RjVfBEoSSrGBxrr6JwrKMj3AMGkmBcFqSVavVMucymwtILrFduWltCzBP KsraI8zOK1L3ayKVstlb/Eh38daeTW1jEcWLjBg8ansEVbx8aCR9FehWpyhzG9Ln tthC1mxPeOaXNZB7p1rC6tht4cOChivPF+1XVxi+6hULZ9FE4HdFbVOTDTEN5C7g O1SHNsdVsw10QQStRZkQp+N7luaO9bka2QSltrLq+zwSqF8PbTfpfcf681xVJY/j nykm++aIn2Jq04wZCJSaBMx+xFL5CnRukv93WS6IAZHmnlrg9Kv9NCr2ihKgr2La 3vbvOlUzMUlxAI0pQMSW =2z51 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 18:13:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F0928C for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:13:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684B98FC08 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id u54so2289607wey.13 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:13:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=joS/yTDaZp7RQZeuDw3I8EDDe4QCimwAYhp9gk+gqG8=; b=bj1TTSPy5d23XZc2OISfeQduNto9nVet7HfDB1Tdu6kT31O6jogC3F06hJUcw1lhJa Wy+BtB+0rljkom0GMQkvmG/qPBkZIt8a3e/tacBKoPAMgY7EEGxVmZqPr/wSL/+Swwfa PmutJTahTvk5TZ43nuvsCkGR4fNHf1ZJk+WxI41Hk1W2puEtnsqOD/M8kGRaoBzoFxWS qEUUwczNq0RJHMfNfPIfgChoDkydkzW4zrbWa3x/mmkDhCNxJiItbVCaWpnmy9zIhJEh rqHSrGBIsdckxx2jLlBoBBCl1pij5Cbss4UBpaq4tLOuRME0C83YAiv3K0+C6/uCxaJh /EEA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.120.132 with SMTP id lc4mr2041410wjb.59.1355249612324; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:13:32 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.217.57.9 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:13:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> <201212102352.QAA09737@lariat.net> <20121211140043.GB20011@in-addr.com> <20121211173234.260bf5b8@suse3> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:13:32 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LDfIkz3s1XKZqpbnXbnCzmYFQo4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? From: Adrian Chadd To: Ronald Klop Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:13:34 -0000 On 11 December 2012 08:44, Ronald Klop wrote: > I suggest to make a timeline AND communicate what is happening _now_. Some > small official statement from the release team now and then would make a > large difference. The release team (and developer team in general) know that communication about 9.1-RELEASE hasn't been all that great. They've been doing the "focus on getting work done" thing and yes, unfortunately communication has suffered. Let's all be supportive of them and the enormous amount of hard work they put into trying to get a free release out there for people to use; being critical like this is very likely going to have exactly the opposite effect for people under pressure. :) Adrian From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 20:39:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0C6FC6; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:39:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B81F8FC0C; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Toshi.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2] (may be forged)) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA24997; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:38:57 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <201212112038.NAA24997@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:38:55 -0700 To: Rainer Duffner , Mark Saad From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? In-Reply-To: <20121211173234.260bf5b8@suse3> References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C4A341.9070903@FreeBSD.org> <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> <201212102352.QAA09737@lariat.net> <20121211140043.GB20011@in-addr.com> <20121211173234.260bf5b8@suse3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Adrian Chadd , stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:39:08 -0000 At 09:32 AM 12/11/2012, Rainer Duffner wrote: >For the future, I also suggest not to make a timeline or a public >schedule at all. Less communication rather than more? I would not be in favor of this. YMMV, but it seems to me that this is more the way of large, secretive corporations like Apple than it is of a collaborative open source project. And it is important to have targets. Transparency is vital. I do not mind justified schedule slippages, so long as I can track progress and plan appropriately. It is when I (and everyone else) are in the dark that things get difficult. --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 21:01:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3838BDE for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:01:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@getmail.no) Received: from smtp.getmail.no (smtp.getmail.no [84.208.15.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F248FC14 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:01:46 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Received: from get-mta-scan02.get.basefarm.net ([10.5.16.4]) by get-mta-out01.get.basefarm.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-0.04 64bit (built Jun 20 2008)) with ESMTP id <0MEV009YIX2R3820@get-mta-out01.get.basefarm.net> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:01:39 +0100 (MET) Received: from get-mta-scan02.get.basefarm.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Email Security Appliance) with SMTP id BBB391EA8283_C79F33B for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:01:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kg-v2.kg4.no (cm-84.215.134.159.getinternet.no [84.215.134.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by get-mta-scan02.get.basefarm.net (Sophos Email Appliance) with ESMTPSA id A7EC81F55273_C79F32F for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:01:38 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:01:38 +0100 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Custom Kernel for FreeBSD Installation Message-id: <20121211220138.1f4bea85e278eca54b074daf@getmail.no> In-reply-to: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:01:47 -0000 On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:26:03 -0500 "xenophon\\+freebsd" wrote: > How do I go about replacing the kernel on the FreeBSD installation CDs? Not an answer to your question, but do you need to? Can't the DL380 G3 boot from something else, like a usb image? HTH -- Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 21:55:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D98EA41 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:55:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281888FC21 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:55:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06EBC6A6001; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:55:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBBLt0G6011878; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:55:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qBBLt0VI002211; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:55:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:55:00 +0100 From: Lars Engels To: Kurt Jaeger Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? Message-ID: <20121211215500.GK69108@e-new.0x20.net> References: <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> <201212102352.QAA09737@lariat.net> <20121211140043.GB20011@in-addr.com> <20121211173234.260bf5b8@suse3> <20121211165051.GV12114@home.opsec.eu> <20121211171335.GA99166@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> <20121211175559.GW12114@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+kGj9HXVJb05GbxD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121211175559.GW12114@home.opsec.eu> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p4 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:55:02 -0000 --+kGj9HXVJb05GbxD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 06:55:59PM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! >=20 > > > The last few years it was always shortly after x-mas 8-} > >=20 > > Christmas comes early this year: there hasn't been an official announce- > > ment yet >=20 > So, as every year: be patient, wait for the official release announcement, > it still might change due to some last-minute bug. It usually gets officially released some days _after_ heise.de announces that it is released. :-s Nothing to see on heise, yet, so please be patient. ;-) --+kGj9HXVJb05GbxD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlDHq7QACgkQKc512sD3afirGwCfcVBJBONJEF3HIW7UI/2PdFzy Ci8An0y5vzmqiS2ddH0c1z9S2sER51VP =9r19 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+kGj9HXVJb05GbxD-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 22:30:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFEAA35 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:30:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E9D48FC13 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.16]) by ltcfislmsgpa03.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBBMUkRi026531 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:30:46 -0600 Received: from [10.0.0.102] (10.14.152.61) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:30:46 -0600 Subject: Re: Custom Kernel for FreeBSD Installation MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" From: Devin Teske In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:30:44 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: To: "xenophon\\+freebsd" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.61] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-12-11_09:2012-12-11,2012-12-11,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Devin Teske List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:30:48 -0000 I built this thing called the "Druid" to handle this (and other) problems. Here's the idea=85 (a) need a custom kernel to install (b) you need to install said custom kernel to the new distribution else fir= st-boot fails Enter Druid. Here's how it works: =3D=3D=3D Step 1. Download the source code to the FreeBSD Druid so you can build a cu= stom ISO with your custom kernel/kernel-distribution $ cvs -d:pserver:anonymous@druidbsd.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/druidbsd l= ogin # Simply press ENTER at the "CVS password:" prompt If you want the FreeBSD-9 based sources: $ cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonymous@druidbsd.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/druidb= sd co -P druidbsd/druid or, if you want the FreeBSD-8 based sources: $ cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonymous@druidbsd.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/druidb= sd co -P druidbsd/druid83 # Either of these will take approximately 15 minutes to download (so please= be patient) # Simply try again if you get the following error: # cvs [checkout aborted]: read lock failed - giving up =3D=3D=3D Step 2: Add your custom kernel $ cd druidbsd/druid/ # or: cd druidbsd/druid83/ $ cp ~/YOURKERNEL mdroot/kernels/YOURKERNEL $ vi mdroot/boot/menu.rc # Find the below lines \ Set kernel paths (see menu_caption[2] below) set kernel_prefix=3D"kernels/" set kernel[0]=3D"GENERIC-i386-9.0" set kernel_suffix=3D"" # Change to (making YOURKERNEL the first kernel and GENERIC the second) \ Set kernel paths (see menu_caption[2] below) set kernel_prefix=3D"kernels/" set kernel[0]=3D"YOURKERNEL" set kernel[1]=3D"GENERIC-i386-9.0" set kernel_suffix=3D"" # Save the file and exit # NOTE: At this point, you *could* say "gmake freebsd" and you have FreeBSD= -9 installation media that will use your custom kernel (YOURKERNEL) to boot= and perform the installation. However, you may have to on to step 3 if tha= t kernel is required to boot your newly installed OS # NOTE: For the 8.x based media, you'll notice that the "kernel_suffix" is = ".kgz" (you will have to kgzip your kernel and make sure it has this suffix= else you can modify the suffix; all kernels must have the same suffix, wha= tever it is). =3D=3D=3D Step 3: Have the custom kernel installed as part of the OS $ cd src/freebsd/repos/9.0-RELEASE/kernels/ # rest performed as root $ mkdir distroot $ cat generic.?? | tar zxf - -C distroot $ cd distroot $ cp YOURKERNEL GENERIC/kernel # Optional: copy in any "*.symbols" files for debug or extra "*.ko" kernel = modules into GENERIC/ $ ../../../../tools/distmtree > ../generic.mtree $ tar czfo ../generic.tgz . $ cd .. $ rm -f generic.?? $ split -b 1425408 generic.tgz generic. $ rm -Rf generic.tgz distroot # rest performed as you (non-root) $ ../../../tools/distsum # This regenerates CHECKSUM.* and *.inf =3D=3D=3D Last, make the custom ISO=85 # in the druidbsd/druid or druidbsd/druid83 directory=85 ./configure && gmake freebsd # NOTE: GNU make is required. mkisofs is required. And, if you want the ISO= to work as-intended and support both burning to CD/DVD _and_ writing to US= B thumb drive, you'll need Perl (which usually comes with the required Byte= s.pm module -- otherwise, you can do ./configure --disable-isohybrid). # NOTE: Don't forget that the DRUID installer has both i386 _and_ amd64 arc= hitectures (so if you have a custom kernel for both, you'll need to do both= repositories in the above-described manner). --=20 Devin On Dec 11, 2012, at 6:26 AM, xenophon+freebsd wrote: > How do I go about replacing the kernel on the FreeBSD installation CDs? > I assume it's as simple as replacing the relevant files in the ISO > image, and that if I look at "make release", I can figure out how the CD > image gets generated.=20 >=20 > I'm trying to install FreeBSD onto a HP ProLiant DL380 G3 with a Smart > Array 5i controller, for use as a file server. Rather than use Smart > Array's RAID features, I want to use ZFS's RAID-Z1/Z2, so I have > configured 18 RAID-0 volumes, each consisting of a single drive attached > to the Smart Array controller. This totals 18 drives, so at boot time, > the ciss(4) driver logs the following error: >=20 > ciss0: port 0x3000-0x30ff mem > 0xf05c0000-0xf05fffff,0xf04f0000-0xf04f3fff irq 10 at device 3.0 on pci1 > ciss0: PERFORMANT Transport > ciss0: adapter claims to report absurd number of logical drives > (18 > 15) > device_attach: ciss0 attach returned 6=09 >=20 > According to Paul Saab > (http://lserinol.blogspot.com/2012/03/freebsd-ciss-driver-logical-drive- > limit.html), the constant CISS_MAX_LOGICAL limits the amount of memory > used by the driver for DMA by default. >=20 > Best wishes, > Matthew >=20 > --=20 > I FIGHT FOR THE USERS >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 02:01:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90BF2D7; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 02:01:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B5D8FC0C; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 02:01:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 9A87B5606F; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:01:52 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:01:52 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: Mark Saad Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? Message-ID: <20121212020152.GA11941@lonesome.com> References: <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> <201212102352.QAA09737@lariat.net> <20121211140043.GB20011@in-addr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Brett Glass , Adrian Chadd , stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 02:01:53 -0000 On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:18:44AM -0500, Mark Saad wrote: > the ISO are on the master server The release is official when, and only when, a signed email from the release engineering team says that it is. In a past release cycle there was indeed a last-minute fix that had to be made after the ISO had already started propogating. mcl From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 07:13:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49E39B2 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:13:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shiv.nath@digital-infotech.net) Received: from mail.digital-infotech.net (mail.digital-infotech.net [41.211.25.193]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225328FC08 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digital-infotech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6C62E4109; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:13:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.digital-infotech.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.digital-infotech.net [127.0.0.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87632-05; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:13:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.digital-infotech.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digital-infotech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3094B2E4107; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:13:24 +0000 (GMT) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.0 mail.digital-infotech.net 3094B2E4107 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=digital-infotech.net; s=digital; t=1355296404; bh=ShZkLOYcKRoHHiOonH+ydfE6HlAdDGc5Ed0I1+daW6c=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Reply-To; b=EgtOhuS0T24jIPenIrba/vms53TRNg2ttJExdPbY/EmnNmavEXj52HKn4llEPXggF m7C3SCuBMhn5X7EzojEPVASbJUzB/p69Oom1RICM6RQESVZ0Ys04TLuMARpgL4tRny 2rfxUu6NE4RDf6xeRj+QZCIcC7UdZ1/AFS787Aos= Received: from 41.211.28.7 (SquirrelMail authenticated user prabhpal@digital-infotech.net) by mail.digital-infotech.net with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:13:24 -0000 Message-ID: <76581676dc02c1c9fca7d7f655693a99.squirrel@mail.digital-infotech.net> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:13:24 -0000 Subject: captive Portal Pfsense + FreeRadius + MySQL DBMS From: "Shiv. Nath" To: list@lists.pfsense.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: shiv.nath@digital-infotech.net List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:13:33 -0000 Dear Friends Greetings, i have a question for you, i am sure someone can help. The pfsense captive portal is up and running. Time countdown vouchers are working without issue, such as 30m, 45m, 1h & so on. However, I'd like to set up a download quota of 200MB per voucher. but then you need to login with a username and password, instead of vouchers. but I haven't found a way to generate username & password when generating vouchers. is there someone who managed to get this working? At the moment vouchers are only for time based login. any clue, little information or document reference would be greatly appreciated. Thanks / Shiv. Nath From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 09:03:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC13DE2E; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:03:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-da0-f54.google.com (mail-da0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AEF78FC13; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:03:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-da0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n2so167405dad.13 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 01:03:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=EYbO2We3labgcSJk8flKsCWINoihunqPL2+dJ9oEp/0=; b=su+5L5SnJhlZZZ5wIgODmfxUX11JZPoZdw/3xN3C6AjlXxrjOJJW4S69IpKAMdTdct 1OJxTG/4u6gtMufElWaQL8TJ0xfC68gzpjVFdv52XLMME4HGVY88eFVsQR1fkCTDD19i +jURCYGqHVhEgd7twrM3tWZjo20jhgSdhjtsSN9D/5ISkdpoNu49bXbeOsLpprBQEYgk 4L63SMTBYgtHdNlwIHwze9TO93mNuoiJ51iKg/rP8lkylZIDuzgs7mC4EA0igXqgGspm bJ0j7nZEuplMxxLrd7kw+nYXhxCIhlp0EQ+V1Wx+vJHRuC3oui8R5+4U7VJN+pL3D3YD TxyA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.237.135 with SMTP id vc7mr835547pbc.2.1355303020851; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 01:03:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.80.36 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 01:03:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121212020152.GA11941@lonesome.com> References: <201212092031.NAA17017@lariat.net> <201212092215.PAA17770@lariat.net> <201212101735.KAA02736@lariat.net> <201212102352.QAA09737@lariat.net> <20121211140043.GB20011@in-addr.com> <20121212020152.GA11941@lonesome.com> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:03:40 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? From: David Demelier To: Mark Linimon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Brett Glass , Mark Saad , stable@freebsd.org, Adrian Chadd X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:03:41 -0000 Is the SVN revision gonna disappear from the uname -a output ? I hope. cheers, 2012/12/12 Mark Linimon > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:18:44AM -0500, Mark Saad wrote: > > the ISO are on the master server > > The release is official when, and only when, a signed email from the > release engineering team says that it is. > > In a past release cycle there was indeed a last-minute fix that had > to be made after the ISO had already started propogating. > > mcl > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Demelier David From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 09:44:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B1E6F9 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:44:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prabhpal@digital-infotech.net) Received: from mail.digital-infotech.net (mail.digital-infotech.net [41.211.25.193]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E558FC1D for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digital-infotech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 221DF2E4103; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:44:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.digital-infotech.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.digital-infotech.net [127.0.0.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93937-02; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:44:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.digital-infotech.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digital-infotech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5652E4102; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:44:26 +0000 (GMT) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.0 mail.digital-infotech.net EA5652E4102 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=digital-infotech.net; s=digital; t=1355305467; bh=Y3W6z/uTgdvKNca+2zok+iH50Jsn41xYY/qof9tjqhE=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:From:To:Reply-To; b=YS6Idqal+wTUMhcRkama5Jn7HGS1EpJ56fK/ATedO20MVynFhZR4wqYsPhaSKgWrX MG8+xpaQjZR1FIgR/YMzwB7AU5X1HSZW8cAmjWFG5RDbck9ENMHp70irMhASSCYUdd jBA55K9IyIpogxH94XuUJxaFURVSkLtLgICsOEBY= Received: from 41.211.28.7 (SquirrelMail authenticated user prabhpal@digital-infotech.net) by mail.digital-infotech.net with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:44:27 -0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <76581676dc02c1c9fca7d7f655693a99.squirrel@mail.digital-infotech.net> References: <76581676dc02c1c9fca7d7f655693a99.squirrel@mail.digital-infotech.net> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:44:27 -0000 Subject: captive Portal Pfsense + FreeRadius + MySQL DBMS From: "Shiv. Nath" To: list@lists.pfsense.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: prabhpal@digital-infotech.net List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:44:29 -0000 Dear Friends Greetings, i have a question for you, i am sure someone can help. The pfsense captive portal is up and running. Time countdown vouchers are working without issue, such as 30m, 45m, 1h & so on. However, I'd like to set up a download quota of 200MB per voucher. but then you need to login with a username and password, instead of vouchers. but I haven't found a way to generate username & password when generating vouchers. is there someone who managed to get this working? At the moment vouchers are only for time based login. any clue, little information or document reference would be greatly appreciated. Thanks / Prabhpal S. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 09:48:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9469192C for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:48:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amitabhkant@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com (mail-pa0-f54.google.com [209.85.220.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60BB08FC0A for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:48:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id bi5so428744pad.13 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 01:48:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=6lACYgbCVUIluD1WsYPdBWdGRMwFMUF9OnXNmd8S3ek=; b=q1C3TjRWbHXdaxSbrL8MW2JMciWCSKd1+8pChtqvoWe3AvJMYqzj9lCW/nnhN39E3V FBnPh2WHO0AlF/Qt99YI/JIg+wwM7Gnctq+BtStt7a96z2VGjw3HTzbgf98esOQuRLUT ljQz1bgzDJbk/so7ao0ginoOz1HWxm++3oBNWaGTqvIWeEoGwzhg5gYPR85ZX3egtgL7 cXgvPd+KsgMe6DHiFyA73aSqpwX7DHMgqwh+rCYi7BQlVjmkSxWChc8LurmRJs+zaD3n k1zpXSUV2SOdVx15PdQt/mCEyjiF1lK7Eq7zELxqlLmTBscSQNTroC3WlNQeXdWUoU8U qKIw== Received: by 10.68.189.233 with SMTP id gl9mr1139348pbc.166.1355305730605; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 01:48:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.125.162 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 01:48:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <76581676dc02c1c9fca7d7f655693a99.squirrel@mail.digital-infotech.net> From: Amitabh Kant Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:18:29 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: captive Portal Pfsense + FreeRadius + MySQL DBMS To: prabhpal@digital-infotech.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: list@lists.pfsense.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:48:56 -0000 On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Shiv. Nath wrote: > > Dear Friends Greetings, > > i have a question for you, i am sure someone can help. The pfsense captive > portal is up and running. Time countdown vouchers are working without > issue, such as 30m, 45m, 1h & so on. > > However, I'd like to set up a download quota of 200MB per voucher. but > then you need to login with a username and password, instead of vouchers. > but I haven't found a way to generate username & password when generating > vouchers. is there someone who managed to get this working? At the moment > vouchers are only for time based login. > > any clue, little information or document reference would be greatly > appreciated. > > Thanks / Prabhpal S. > > This is a question that will best answered on either pfSense mailing list or their online forums. If you need to ask freebsd, use freebsd-general mailing list where someone might have an idea. Amitabh From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 09:53:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A00A8B; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:53:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ingresso.co.uk) Received: from constantine.ingresso.co.uk (constantine.ingresso.co.uk [IPv6:2a02:b90:3002:e550::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F3B8FC12; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dilbert.london-internal.ingresso.co.uk ([10.64.50.6] helo=dilbert.ingresso.co.uk) by constantine.ingresso.co.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Tij0J-000CMK-8q; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:53:27 +0000 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ingresso.co.uk with local (Exim 4.80 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Tij0J-000Po6-7j; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:53:27 +0000 To: demelier.david@gmail.com, linimon@lonesome.com Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? In-Reply-To: Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:53:27 +0000 Cc: brett@lariat.net, adrian@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, nonesuch@longcount.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:53:38 -0000 > Is the SVN revision gonna disappear from the uname -a output ? I hope. This comment surprises me - having the svn revision there is one of the best thigns about moving to svn from csup for me. I can look at a running machine, and know how to chekcout precisely the code is was built from. Very useful. -pete. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 09:56:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123C2BD6; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:56:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC33D8FC0A; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:56:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id wz12so403640pbc.13 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 01:56:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=M147Ui/GGoEQpOppHAbmvUTi8kjDAjvasiru4PEwlLE=; b=FWjOghFBEPM5PnaPiPotyLhUH0Lh4fthkxrymXLFXJSP/4+llqXEkryxaK/Y4jlhTT 7ssCXij/rbO5M1YJ4JJbtInQwTwK/oSlr+H0VYTjMOwemDm72Uct8E+3w64UyGe74GWm INCOaGR9goxw2TxeWFirtHKqPowefJUC0AatsDqjp3TN3P3wv8fnYOQ1L2HWxs8FsQig +Sliua9qVbIdpBsygpBLgOY/uKaKwZaoK3Gs+vz5PKzTsB+EA7blLY/94sORzSUimpiC LDWiCdl4L29kv5rEq9H9d4wFZxF9SdvRinrq4/6/bjuCpj606/v52xrihDQMZr/ehsCl aVEA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.134.232 with SMTP id pn8mr1200799pbb.47.1355306196377; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 01:56:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.80.36 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 01:56:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:56:36 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? From: David Demelier To: Pete French Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: linimon@lonesome.com, adrian@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, nonesuch@longcount.org, brett@lariat.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:56:37 -0000 You're right, but one who install a 9.1-RELEASE from iso will obviously still have the same SVN revision, of course it is still great when following -STABLE. 2012/12/12 Pete French > > Is the SVN revision gonna disappear from the uname -a output ? I hope. > > This comment surprises me - having the svn revision there is one of the > best thigns about moving to svn from csup for me. I can look at a running > machine, and know how to chekcout precisely the code is was built from. > Very > useful. > > -pete. > -- Demelier David From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 10:48:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767F7678 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:48:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andriy.kornatskyy@live.com) Received: from dub0-omc2-s3.dub0.hotmail.com (dub0-omc2-s3.dub0.hotmail.com [157.55.1.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078D18FC16 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:48:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DUB117-W67 ([157.55.1.136]) by dub0-omc2-s3.dub0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 02:47:24 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [194.44.213.194] X-EIP: [XKupeP9/EZodOMWBuH3z4Evig4iz92rs] X-Originating-Email: [andriy.kornatskyy@live.com] Message-ID: From: Andriy Kornatskyy To: Subject: How to create Jail in FreeBSD Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:47:24 +0300 Importance: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Dec 2012 10:47:24.0861 (UTC) FILETIME=[124066D0:01CDD856] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:48:32 -0000 Operating system virtualization is the most effective way to utilize your s= ystem resources=2C jails let you setup isolated mini-systems. Jails are exp= lains well in handbook however=2C from practical standpoint of view=2C the = presented material is incomplete. The post below setup few scrips that follow handbook's 'Application of Jail= s' article and enhance with few missing features (networking related). http://mindref.blogspot.com/2012/12/freebsd-jail.html Comments or suggestions are welcome. Thanks. Andriy Kornatskyy = From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 11:21:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364CBD0D for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:21:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D701E8FC13 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l1so621832vba.13 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:21:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=F7rkjcoIDeii6yGt3tAOpAoFAsR2e973gXy2pxfVFY4=; b=BRY4ayY4otPvdroKTRWm2WhwYXe/sgIxIBfMGfawpe6roYQsED1EcSNDyzV+GOzmlX 0O+7WHqSpN3TEJzJzO6BNkDqaIOAhzsu5O+u2u1FLfqmCyyxu2Jv/l3+BtBuVRiZcl8H vDWryHRFk3iXRq0yf0kNQlMqubkl0xw9VLItHB6cZEwLtd5rEbk1j2wb/pJcSsw+WLOo cyLSK9xpJ/ByZXY2WDYwXQ75fvl5XH5XiMvpf/CwMuuLEPcUv5ydp0C7KWmF8GncJzd7 dXtqkre+PovEElLPvlIYE2Jaqb8DJzXj0o9o6qSIbLquVfd396FwyDOm25TCB2bJSqwR qdnw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.33.228 with SMTP id u4mr272448vdi.4.1355311280993; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:21:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.215.106 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:21:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201212090526.26535.lumiwa@gmail.com> References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C412F6.7040300@sdf.org> <201212090526.26535.lumiwa@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:21:20 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? From: Franci Nabalanci To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Chris Petrik X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:21:22 -0000 Problem is not release, problem are ports: second day and I am still running update for cyrus-sasl and pcre new because there are so many errors. Today I check /usr/ports/UPDATE and I saw another week for update: ImageMagick -r... And than after March we will gt GIMP 2.8, KDE whatever version...and New year will be here... And the same story repeat again... On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 5:26 AM, ajtiM wrote: > On Saturday 08 December 2012 22:26:30 Chris Petrik wrote: > > It will be released when it is ready. > > > > Perfect answer... And one hour after release thounsands of new ports for > building on Christmas time ): > > > Mitja > -------- > http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 13:08:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 180AD49C for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:08:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1-6.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF338FC0A for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:08:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.43.26] (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBCD8gbC026597; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:08:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <50C881ED.2040407@sentex.net> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:09:01 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andriy Kornatskyy Subject: Re: How to create Jail in FreeBSD References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 64.7.153.18 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:08:43 -0000 On 12/12/2012 5:47 AM, Andriy Kornatskyy wrote: > > http://mindref.blogspot.com/2012/12/freebsd-jail.html > > Comments or suggestions are welcome. Hi, Perhaps a note that sysctl security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=1 no longer works on RELENG_9 you need to do it on a per jail basis it seems. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=173469 and http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/2012-November/001989.html discuss it further -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 13:32:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD36D19 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:32:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andriy.kornatskyy@live.com) Received: from dub0-omc4-s1.dub0.hotmail.com (dub0-omc4-s1.dub0.hotmail.com [157.55.2.76]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8758FC08 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:32:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DUB117-W50 ([157.55.2.73]) by dub0-omc4-s1.dub0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:31:19 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [194.44.213.194] X-EIP: [vLvjdzjJKxdHq8B77BrakoSQqRoM+T3Y] X-Originating-Email: [andriy.kornatskyy@live.com] Message-ID: From: Andriy Kornatskyy To: Subject: RE: How to create Jail in FreeBSD Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:31:18 +0300 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <50C881ED.2040407@sentex.net> References: , <50C881ED.2040407@sentex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Dec 2012 13:31:19.0093 (UTC) FILETIME=[F7E91E50:01CDD86C] Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:32:27 -0000 Mike=2C Unfortunately=2C this doesn't work per jail (FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3)... not= ready yet? Just double checked=2C sysctl as global settings works. Thanks. Andriy Kornatskyy ---------------------------------------- > Date: Wed=2C 12 Dec 2012 08:09:01 -0500 > From: mike@sentex.net > To: andriy.kornatskyy@live.com > Subject: Re: How to create Jail in FreeBSD > CC: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > On 12/12/2012 5:47 AM=2C Andriy Kornatskyy wrote: > > > > http://mindref.blogspot.com/2012/12/freebsd-jail.html > > > > Comments or suggestions are welcome. > > Hi=2C > Perhaps a note that > > sysctl security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=3D1 > > no longer works on RELENG_9 > > you need to do it on a per jail basis it seems. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D173469 > > and > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/2012-November/001989.html > discuss it further > > > -- > ------------------- > Mike Tancsa=2C tel +1 519 651 3400 > Sentex Communications=2C mike@sentex.net > Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net > Cambridge=2C Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe=2C send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" = From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 14:04:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493D275D for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:04:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1-6.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C408FC08 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.43.26] (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBCE4oZ6036419; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:04:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <50C88F15.2090703@sentex.net> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:05:09 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andriy Kornatskyy Subject: Re: How to create Jail in FreeBSD References: , <50C881ED.2040407@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 64.7.153.18 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:04:51 -0000 On 12/12/2012 8:31 AM, Andriy Kornatskyy wrote: > Unfortunately, this doesn't work per jail (FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3)... not ready yet? Hi, The change when in post 9.0 and is in RELENG_9 and will be in 9.1R ---Mike > > ---------------------------------------- >> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:09:01 -0500 >> From: mike@sentex.net >> To: andriy.kornatskyy@live.com >> Subject: Re: How to create Jail in FreeBSD >> CC: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >> >> On 12/12/2012 5:47 AM, Andriy Kornatskyy wrote: >>> >>> http://mindref.blogspot.com/2012/12/freebsd-jail.html >>> >>> Comments or suggestions are welcome. >> >> Hi, >> Perhaps a note that >> >> sysctl security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=1 >> >> no longer works on RELENG_9 >> >> you need to do it on a per jail basis it seems. >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=173469 >> >> and >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/2012-November/001989.html >> discuss it further >> >> >> -- >> ------------------- >> Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 >> Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net >> Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net >> Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 16:14:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7656E5E9; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpaasial@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1141A8FC16; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l1so993309vba.13 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:14:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iWRNdWiX0Fkpyc+j8elyWwtgi3lPfi5KXEZeurgVTL8=; b=GZZJaGuVGbL92HNHwupXvi6xg3/WORE0UF2wy4EgWvOp9slUT+nVX3E+sVAo7n+wKV ody2ST75ESDNSNiIlOspj+kFvINxNNoMSg+GnQdFE+KwboFizvaAmCHwLbLz2Fq8aS2W AUbeVIHjqv3J8khj3yQXnVf9Ln7xpvalEAgq1Xviodc/SycW/3atySfsm2uLBE3jNZcM /O6w/Gk2sDk1sZmbzj2ZNser+iM2VTSzSqwFiLdjsC4Miwam0JK4O3tusgDwoCLaBom8 rZHUBY9IIfgcL1czVXWwRMQSoMrcXGwJDD5RTqSyfzcbHCsVMYHnESSyaFLKN1Xuic2l mF6A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.115.133 with SMTP id i5mr799596vcq.42.1355328875239; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:14:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.209.163 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:14:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:14:35 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh, SYSDIR set to wrong directory. From: Kimmo Paasiala To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:14:36 -0000 Hello, My 9-STABLE buildworld broke in a very inexplicable way, I was getting an error on /usr/src/include/osreldate.h that I couldn't figure out until I started looking at the sys/conf/newvers.sh and what it does. It turned out that the thing that broke my buildworld was having .git directory at the root directory of the system because I recently started using GIT to track the configuration files. I added some debug echos to the newvers.sh and I found out it's setting SYSDIR to /bin/.. which in turn causes the newvers.sh to set the gitdir to /.git and that seems to break the logic in newvers.sh. Isn't SYSDIR supposed to be set to the sys -subdirectory of the source tree (/usr/src/sys default)? I'm guessing the reason the SYSDIR gets set to /bin/.. is the line in newvers.sh: SYSDIR=$(dirname $0)/.. $0 is actually /bin/sh and not the path to newver.sh because the newvers.sh is sourced by the Makefile in /usr/src/include instead of executing it: osreldate.h: ${.CURDIR}/../sys/conf/newvers.sh ${.CURDIR}/../sys/sys/param.h \ ${.CURDIR}/Makefile @${ECHO} creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh @MAKE=${MAKE}; \ PARAMFILE=${.CURDIR}/../sys/sys/param.h; \ . ${.CURDIR}/../sys/conf/newvers.sh; \ Now the question is how to fix this? -Kimmo From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 16:29:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF18A8A for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:29:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F8B8FC08 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:29:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBE36D.dip.t-dialin.net [217.251.227.109]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBCGSxMn033109; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:28:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qBCGSum9096962; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:28:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBCGSWPB024356; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:28:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201212121628.qBCGSWPB024356@fire.js.berklix.net> To: "Shiv. Nath" , "Shiv. Nath" , list@lists.pfsense.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: captive Portal Pfsense + FreeRadius + MySQL DBMS From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:18:29 +0530." Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:28:32 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: Amitabh Kant X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:29:16 -0000 Amitabh Kant wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Shiv. Nath > wrote: > > > > > Dear Friends Greetings, > > > > i have a question for you, i am sure someone can help. The pfsense captive > > portal is up and running. Time countdown vouchers are working without > > issue, such as 30m, 45m, 1h & so on. > > > > However, I'd like to set up a download quota of 200MB per voucher. but > > then you need to login with a username and password, instead of vouchers. > > but I haven't found a way to generate username & password when generating > > vouchers. is there someone who managed to get this working? At the moment > > vouchers are only for time based login. > > > > any clue, little information or document reference would be greatly > > appreciated. > > > > Thanks / Prabhpal S. > > > > > This is a question that will best answered on either pfSense mailing list > or their online forums. & original poster already posted to list@lists.pfsense.org Cross posted (Ugh!) twice (Ugh!) from 2 different addresses at 07:13:24 -0000 (08:13 CET) & 09:44:27 -0000 (10:44 CET) to list@lists.pfsense.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org list@lists.pfsense.org is described as "pfSense support and discussion" by http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/ > If you need to ask freebsd, use freebsd-general > mailing list A non existant list name. > where someone might have an idea. > Amitabh There is no freebsd-general@freebsd.org http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo Includes: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf freebsd-stable@freebsd.org is fairly general, though freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org is more general. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". Send plain text. Not: HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 16:35:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875B3C21 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:35:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amitabhkant@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5158C8FC13 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id wz12so685208pbc.13 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:35:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=1/awGNwQzoEPIEe8OLTAZcKLvOWLuoJjD34wGi7VQCY=; b=OdQhg+mnn2HpHFzKlP6hOGRRCczxCdrgEWx+LSWFtamZGIfJqlV8NDVAs0/qgGoAnR Llf06KUA6koQBbZkW2tFIJa53KRzDHXajv/tzwILqml4R3Dj2MhJyZXHVeip7+fAz5p2 LGgk4WOO09A1V/1EphnmbgE02hgkwuoisShNUMT3gxCQkGTu9oJSGhxzL2tPtK7qAznB Ztiwyg1tmPQB7P/Jsx6pnuIm42tdXohdBcyYJu1RfksQAUCrnWby9hXEQnGYUqT31PpD YNnsZl0edoPq6GMpTkc6vi6RfVh2DbSt6OVHNBjQtl+dVQzcP1A9BXcdUfNsFbcNup5h U1WA== Received: by 10.68.232.195 with SMTP id tq3mr4241681pbc.70.1355330114083; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:35:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.125.162 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:34:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201212121628.qBCGSWPB024356@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <201212121628.qBCGSWPB024356@fire.js.berklix.net> From: Amitabh Kant Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:04:54 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: captive Portal Pfsense + FreeRadius + MySQL DBMS To: "Julian H. Stacey" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "Shiv. Nath" , "Shiv. Nath" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, list@lists.pfsense.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:35:20 -0000 On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > > If you need to ask freebsd, use freebsd-general > > mailing list > > A non existant list name. > > > where someone might have an idea. > > Amitabh > > There is no freebsd-general@freebsd.org > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo > Includes: > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org is fairly general, though > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org is more general. > > Cheers, > Julian > -- > Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich > http://berklix.com > Reply below not above, like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". > Send plain text. Not: HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, > quoted-printable. > My apologies. I meant freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [ http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions] might have a better audience for his question. Amitabh From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 16:54:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8EEE59E; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:54:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org) Received: from duck.symmetricom.us (duck.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456D38FC13; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:54:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from damnhippie.dyndns.org (daffy.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.218]) by duck.symmetricom.us (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBCGrtQZ033194; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:53:55 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org) Received: from [172.22.42.240] (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240]) by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qBCGrpZN056726; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:53:51 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org) Subject: Re: /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh, SYSDIR set to wrong directory. From: Ian Lepore To: Kimmo Paasiala In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:53:51 -0700 Message-ID: <1355331231.87661.461.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:54:02 -0000 On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 18:14 +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > Hello, > > My 9-STABLE buildworld broke in a very inexplicable way, I was > getting an error on /usr/src/include/osreldate.h that I couldn't > figure out until I started looking at the sys/conf/newvers.sh and what > it does. It turned out that the thing that broke my buildworld was > having .git directory at the root directory of the system because I > recently started using GIT to track the configuration files. > > I added some debug echos to the newvers.sh and I found out it's > setting SYSDIR to /bin/.. which in turn causes the newvers.sh to set > the gitdir to /.git and that seems to break the logic in newvers.sh. > > Isn't SYSDIR supposed to be set to the sys -subdirectory of the source > tree (/usr/src/sys default)? > > I'm guessing the reason the SYSDIR gets set to /bin/.. is the line in > newvers.sh: > > SYSDIR=$(dirname $0)/.. > > $0 is actually /bin/sh and not the path to newver.sh because the > newvers.sh is sourced by the Makefile in /usr/src/include instead of > executing it: > > osreldate.h: ${.CURDIR}/../sys/conf/newvers.sh ${.CURDIR}/../sys/sys/param.h \ > ${.CURDIR}/Makefile > @${ECHO} creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh > @MAKE=${MAKE}; \ > PARAMFILE=${.CURDIR}/../sys/sys/param.h; \ > . ${.CURDIR}/../sys/conf/newvers.sh; \ > > Now the question is how to fix this? > > -Kimmo Perhaps it could be handled similar to PARAMFILE, something like this in the makefile: PARAMFILE=${.CURDIR}/../sys/sys/param.h; \ SYSDIR=${.CURDIR}/../sys; \ . ${.CURDIR}/../sys/conf/newvers.sh; \ I'm not sure if newvers.sh needs to work in ways that don't involve being invoked from that makefile rule, so to be safe it could have default handling, something like: : ${SYSDIR:=$(dirname $0)/..} -- Ian From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 17:05:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979FDE34; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:05:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prabhpal@digital-infotech.net) Received: from mail.digital-infotech.net (mail.digital-infotech.net [41.211.25.193]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BFF8FC13; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digital-infotech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0302E4103; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:05:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.digital-infotech.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.digital-infotech.net [127.0.0.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00193-02; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:05:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.digital-infotech.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digital-infotech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CFD32E4102; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:05:26 +0000 (GMT) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.0 mail.digital-infotech.net 2CFD32E4102 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=digital-infotech.net; s=digital; t=1355331926; bh=bmxGCCIA9RYZm7LYuE0iH7j56pE0kos62LHndmEWfJc=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Reply-To; b=JjDuvbKLKy+B3LUclzwbyO7Cl/W6av+NpmQxaYYOI9yYVIBQ95QmrrV6LQ/ZPDQ+I XFf2xysJ4Vh+gy7ktN3PIczuSUpGJWncu07gzZMDHzwE5u+KmnXVNpPcWY+nijW3yf /f04B9TN/aHHR0bZ25l6rmOwtYAuRovZ+qpIe96g= Received: from 41.211.28.7 (SquirrelMail authenticated user prabhpal@digital-infotech.net) by mail.digital-infotech.net with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:05:26 -0000 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:05:26 -0000 Subject: download quota of 200MB per voucher From: "Prabhpal S. Mavi" To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, list@lists.pfsense.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: prabhpal@digital-infotech.net List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:05:27 -0000 Dear Friends, i have a question for you, i am sure someone can help. The pfsense captive portal is up and running. Time countdown vouchers are working without issue, such as 30m, 45m, 1h & so on. However, I'd like to set up a download quota of 200MB per voucher. but then you need to login with a username and password, instead of vouchers. but I haven't found a way to generate username & password when generating vouchers. is there someone who managed to get this working? At the moment vouchers are only for time based login. any clue, little information or document reference would be greatly appreciated. Thanks From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 17:38:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00D8AAD for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:38:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694D18FC0A for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id c13so678745eek.13 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:38:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=q4D4aTzMEKnzSmJ8mv+ZJVpy9lnc5jGOVmikdhkxwFQ=; b=CoLWcWMxnbf/8LY3mq95MmaBfLXj7BWi1bfkeCHM8v/DDgE5gJugpiHHkW51+zTtBp 8NQ8GZ83pX9/RMCyMf/KMUR+8FA28vdASB36Mg8F3vSuu9ZDcamiMq0apmiOtUypXkQa D/CvyUzQXIgFQBdEtaiLEuPCytv+pbxsUU6x721ARZwokLwUWEo4NtD1eL221HAG8ep8 JNa63gS52nyHG7Hy5ooLA+NjYd8YrShrhofhHI4a5MjupDpLG8uJ3E74ScfkWul6JgLI 7fb2v6hzQuVdV9He1zDJaWMvZAl6VqI6wdzBXhjD//bZN/Zezyoivl5y7F03+zuIJiyp 5haA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.184.134 with SMTP id s6mr4577663eem.43.1355333932474; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:38:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.170.193 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:38:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C412F6.7040300@sdf.org> <201212090526.26535.lumiwa@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:38:52 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? From: Kevin Oberman To: Franci Nabalanci Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Chris Petrik , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:38:54 -0000 On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Franci Nabalanci wrote: > Problem is not release, problem are ports: > second day and I am still running update for cyrus-sasl and pcre new > because there are so many errors. Today I check /usr/ports/UPDATE and I saw > another week for update: ImageMagick -r... > And than after March we will gt GIMP 2.8, KDE whatever version...and New > year will be here... > > And the same story repeat again... Please, don't work so hard! ImageMagick required a re-installation of exactly ONE port on my laptop, editors/emacs (which has now been fixed so it actually will re-build). pcre was worse, but still I got everything for all of the commits yesterday rebuilt in a few hours yesterday afternoon. The only REAL issue was avahi-app which has a badly ordered set of lib directories. (Yes, I should submit a PR to get this fixed.) Install sysutils/bsdadminscripts and run: pkg_libchk -o | grep LIB_THAT_GOT_BUMPED | cut -f1 -d: | sort | uniq > SOMEFILE portmaster -D `cat SOMEFILE` pkg_libchk will take a while. On my 2 year old Core i5 laptop it takes around 6 minutes for my 1100 installed ports, but it does let you know just how it is prograssing. This will build a vastly smaller number of ports. You will probably need to remove graphics/py-clutter from SOMEFILE if you have it installed as it is BROKEN for the moment. There may be a couple of others, as well. If you use pkgng, please try editing /usr/local/sbin/pkg_libchk to replace "pkg_info" with "pkg info" in all locations and let me know how it works, . I'm hoping that will make it work with pkgng, but I have no way to check as I can't currently use pkgng on any of my systems, yet. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 18:39:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A207184 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:39:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02298FC08 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:39:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBE36D.dip.t-dialin.net [217.251.227.109]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBCIdDES033782; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:39:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qBCIdBDj071080; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:39:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBCIcqJQ007119; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:39:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201212121839.qBCIcqJQ007119@fire.js.berklix.net> To: "Ronald Klop" Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:38:13 +0100." Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:38:52 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:39:18 -0000 Hi, Reference: > From: "Ronald Klop" > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:38:13 +0100 > Message-id: "Ronald Klop" wrote: > On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:18:44 +0100, Mark Saad > wrote: > > > So what is the short summary ? > > The short summary is that nobody knows. The people who can know anything > don't say much more than "it's ready when it's ready" Cos theyre doubtless working full time on it & no time to answer inanne noise. > and the rest of the > people guess from information from various e-mails and other sources which > reliability can be doubted. Only stuff I count is URLs. > And the last few days people are saying that you have to donate > to the freebsd foundation if you want a release or better information. > ;-) Last paragraph completely False. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". Send plain text. Not: HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 18:40:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11A2289 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:40:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7678B8FC15 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:40:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBCIdwGX067632 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:39:58 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.1 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk qBCIdwGX067632 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/qBCIdwGX067632; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Message-ID: <50C8CF77.2040102@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:39:51 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C412F6.7040300@sdf.org> <201212090526.26535.lumiwa@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE4F99329E32F8C0974694703" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Chris Petrik , Franci Nabalanci X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:40:03 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE4F99329E32F8C0974694703 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/12/2012 17:38, Kevin Oberman wrote: > If you use pkgng, please try editing /usr/local/sbin/pkg_libchk to > replace "pkg_info" with "pkg info" in all locations and let me know > how it works, . I'm hoping that will make it work with pkgng, but I > have no way to check as I can't currently use pkgng on any of my > systems, yet. I'd like to draw people's attention to one of the newer capabilities of pkgng as it's directly relevant to this problem. You can use pkgng to track which shared libraries are used by binaries in all packages. Shared library use is determined by analysing the dynamic loading information recorded in ELF binaries -- either executables or shared libraries -- so it's pretty reliable. The feature is turned off by default, but you can enable it by adding: SHLIBS: YES to ${LOCALBASE}/etc/pkg.conf and then generate the shlib info by: pkg check -Ba This will take a while on a system with lots of packages installed: it will investigate every file installed by every package. If you aren't using a repo where the shlibs function is enabled, you'll have to use pkg check thike this on any new pkgs you subsequently install. Then, for example, you can find all the pkgs with files that link against, say, libssh2 by: worm:~:% pkg query -a "%n-%v %B" | grep libssh2 curl-7.24.0_1 libssh2.so.1 Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enigE4F99329E32F8C0974694703 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDIz34ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzCcQCfdReb38UVRtRCKVqigPf+f067 YJEAniu1zCTfWbqQtYgg8kbUJoxQEslm =mfpr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE4F99329E32F8C0974694703-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 18:43:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237BF40F for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:43:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA378FC08 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBE36D.dip.t-dialin.net [217.251.227.109]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBCIhAOx033803; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:43:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qBCIh8ZE072403; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:43:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBCIgtwd007160; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:43:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201212121843.qBCIgtwd007160@fire.js.berklix.net> To: "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:13:35 +0100." <20121211171335.GA99166@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:42:55 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:43:13 -0000 "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" wrote: > Christmas comes early this year: there hasn't been an official announce- > ment yet and perhaps not all mirrors have synced yet, but I've seen the > ISOs on the NL mirror, so it looks like 9.1-RELEASE is out now. Yup, ftp2.de.freebsd.org also has i386 & amd64, (I didnt look for other cpus) Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". Send plain text. Not: HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 18:45:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345DD541 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:45:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097F38FC14 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:45:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TirJN-000882-8J for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:45:41 -0800 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:45:41 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1355337941248-5768880.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1355165547540-5768186.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <50B471F1.5040704@ose.nl> <1354015603346-5764584.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354271955297-5765495.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354912564145-5767462.post@n5.nabble.com> <50C25B8F.2010605@ose.nl> <1355068021135-5767808.post@n5.nabble.com> <1355068983136-5767809.post@n5.nabble.com> <20121211034618.H52305@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <1355165547540-5768186.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Help review the FAQ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:45:42 -0000 I think HAST (hastd) is faq-worthy, as since release 9, it covers area previously vocally missed by some. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5768880.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 18:52:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4C1AA5; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:52:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpaasial@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B453C8FC0A; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:52:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id fo14so1217458vcb.13 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:52:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=cx4BzxB5npuRhh4zciM8Bj17kzmkfm86NirkakabwJA=; b=gYZBNer2xsNaRdvCMaZobZYL6/oe2Oa6gEN3hfxd3yc7lx+LpPvxbTooiseKn0Poge VAUWg158GcBWtz3/3YDQY/G1K0qMci8czDPcjO0CGSr/4lvdPYtGD/KoMgWmrw9LZCeE Yme3LsNancRKPl6GnNJTGyBDHv7UpHs2EN4Ffo4G5s1toLue7eLA1rsXD59Zht28Nk/p aeAj6mxD3DwXUeL0o1vdM0MdTt19ZuvI7fA3U/VC5wk3qu08EdWDiTAVUGcczNCycuhD NNfy6q4LuWRiLIPSRD5FZGlXM8g2Qyh8SmL46Aog83nV8AHCVpg4cjDtKDvC6tsrByF2 eZ3A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.33.228 with SMTP id u4mr940246vdi.4.1355338373048; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:52:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.209.163 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:52:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1355331231.87661.461.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> References: <1355331231.87661.461.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:52:52 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh, SYSDIR set to wrong directory. From: Kimmo Paasiala To: Ian Lepore Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:52:54 -0000 On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 18:14 +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: >> Hello, >> >> My 9-STABLE buildworld broke in a very inexplicable way, I was >> getting an error on /usr/src/include/osreldate.h that I couldn't >> figure out until I started looking at the sys/conf/newvers.sh and what >> it does. It turned out that the thing that broke my buildworld was >> having .git directory at the root directory of the system because I >> recently started using GIT to track the configuration files. >> >> I added some debug echos to the newvers.sh and I found out it's >> setting SYSDIR to /bin/.. which in turn causes the newvers.sh to set >> the gitdir to /.git and that seems to break the logic in newvers.sh. >> >> Isn't SYSDIR supposed to be set to the sys -subdirectory of the source >> tree (/usr/src/sys default)? >> >> I'm guessing the reason the SYSDIR gets set to /bin/.. is the line in >> newvers.sh: >> >> SYSDIR=$(dirname $0)/.. >> >> $0 is actually /bin/sh and not the path to newver.sh because the >> newvers.sh is sourced by the Makefile in /usr/src/include instead of >> executing it: >> >> osreldate.h: ${.CURDIR}/../sys/conf/newvers.sh ${.CURDIR}/../sys/sys/param.h \ >> ${.CURDIR}/Makefile >> @${ECHO} creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh >> @MAKE=${MAKE}; \ >> PARAMFILE=${.CURDIR}/../sys/sys/param.h; \ >> . ${.CURDIR}/../sys/conf/newvers.sh; \ >> >> Now the question is how to fix this? >> >> -Kimmo > > Perhaps it could be handled similar to PARAMFILE, something like this in > the makefile: > > PARAMFILE=${.CURDIR}/../sys/sys/param.h; \ > SYSDIR=${.CURDIR}/../sys; \ > . ${.CURDIR}/../sys/conf/newvers.sh; \ > > I'm not sure if newvers.sh needs to work in ways that don't involve > being invoked from that makefile rule, so to be safe it could have > default handling, something like: > > : ${SYSDIR:=$(dirname $0)/..} > > -- Ian > > Thanks, that works. Should I file a PR about this? -Kimmo From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 19:15:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A15C1CE; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:15:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com (mail-la0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069838FC14; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:15:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id j13so1006982lah.13 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:15:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=98u0P/ZMBVi18UWyNqNqsqRc1tcXHakW1CvAmVCtVeM=; b=u/FXRjLgT021qElVRnM8FdiMysHVY70w6aqMdZV3sf6IV1TxoYNC2UzUEzd5BobIGI YsJzppbYakzuHFMKRfshg30VSV2GbEdfedsTHKWtf/pbrlmVMZgcNWUPZ/S9hJcXNGhX c67TmQofOm3DPlX2Tm+Anm4a79hCTuZB7TKqqU/k0SlK9+42jO6HU8YcmX8Vt7zhaXde trMCKr79CQWLqmoXWo+G3n99fxRybaLjC6XQGQOUfShlkEnb9pBDTMjoINhb+KM3mHuB rzK/Lle7sMm3wdXeOLluci6LKdCrLxqZCeuHKujIbCzDvkBk/+Gyjq03HBgFOhPFmM0h 9+6Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.88.7 with SMTP id bc7mr925250lbb.108.1355339723725; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:15:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.99.70 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:15:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1355331231.87661.461.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:15:23 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh, SYSDIR set to wrong directory. From: Garrett Cooper To: Kimmo Paasiala Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Ian Lepore , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Alfred Perlstein , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Josh Paetzel , Xin LI X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:15:26 -0000 On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: ... > Thanks, that works. Should I file a PR about this? There are other issues with this that should be resolved (in particular, modifying include/Makefile that FreeNAS has been packing around for a year or so now). Filed a PR here a year ago, but no one has committed it yet even though it should be trivial enough to review and commit: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/160646 . Alfred/Josh/Xin: could you please commit this change first? Thanks! -Garrett From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 19:25:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7EA7C8 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:25:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ptyll@nitronet.pl) Received: from mail.nitronet.pl (smtp.nitronet.pl [195.90.106.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D6A8FC18 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:25:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailnull by mail.nitronet.pl with virscan (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1TirvV-0005Bu-Nh for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:25:05 +0100 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:24:43 +0100 From: Pawel Tyll X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <7010188086.20121212202443@nitronet.pl> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. [Solved] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------0AF17204D13F56220" X-Virus-Scanned: Nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ptyll@nitronet.pl X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.nitronet.pl); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: Lawrence Stewart , Gleb Smirnoff , Steven Hartland , Ronald Klop X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:25:07 -0000 ------------0AF17204D13F56220 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In closing, Gleb has solved the problem with attached patch. Many thanks to everyone involved and to Gleb for finding out what's wrong and fixing it. p. ------------0AF17204D13F56220 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="fwd_tag.diff" Content-transfer-encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="fwd_tag.diff" SW5kZXg6IHRjcF9pbnB1dC5jDQo9PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09DQotLS0gdGNwX2lucHV0LmMJKHJl dmlzaW9uIDI0NDExNCkNCisrKyB0Y3BfaW5wdXQuYwkod29ya2luZyBjb3B5KQ0KQEAgLTgy Miw2ICs4MjIsNyBAQA0KIAkJLyogUmVtb3ZlIHRoZSB0YWcgZnJvbSB0aGUgcGFja2V0LiAg V2UgZG9uJ3QgbmVlZCBpdCBhbnltb3JlLiAqLw0KIAkJbV90YWdfZGVsZXRlKG0sIGZ3ZF90 YWcpOw0KIAkJbS0+bV9mbGFncyAmPSB+TV9JUF9ORVhUSE9QOw0KKwkJZndkX3RhZyA9IE5V TEw7DQogCX0gZWxzZSBpZiAoaXNpcHY2KSB7DQogCQlpbnAgPSBpbjZfcGNibG9va3VwX21i dWYoJlZfdGNiaW5mbywgJmlwNi0+aXA2X3NyYywNCiAJCSAgICB0aC0+dGhfc3BvcnQsICZp cDYtPmlwNl9kc3QsIHRoLT50aF9kcG9ydCwNCkBAIC04NTksNiArODYwLDcgQEANCiAJCS8q IFJlbW92ZSB0aGUgdGFnIGZyb20gdGhlIHBhY2tldC4gIFdlIGRvbid0IG5lZWQgaXQgYW55 bW9yZS4gKi8NCiAJCW1fdGFnX2RlbGV0ZShtLCBmd2RfdGFnKTsNCiAJCW0tPm1fZmxhZ3Mg Jj0gfk1fSVBfTkVYVEhPUDsNCisJCWZ3ZF90YWcgPSBOVUxMOw0KIAl9IGVsc2UNCiAJCWlu cCA9IGluX3BjYmxvb2t1cF9tYnVmKCZWX3RjYmluZm8sIGlwLT5pcF9zcmMsDQogCQkgICAg dGgtPnRoX3Nwb3J0LCBpcC0+aXBfZHN0LCB0aC0+dGhfZHBvcnQsDQo= ------------0AF17204D13F56220-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 21:58:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1D75F2 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:58:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DBA08FC0C for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail.dweimer.net [192.168.5.1]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBCLwCJP038682 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:58:13 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:58:12 -0600 From: dweimer To: FreeBSD Stable Subject: 9.1 system hung with top open on console, yet responsive on ssh =?UTF-8?Q?sessions=3F?= Organization: dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: Message-ID: <17622505fce802a8359c4a37f120f9bf@dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:58:20 -0000 I ran into a weird one, have a 9.1 test system (virtual in VMWare Workstation 9) that I left running logged into the console with top running. The console the top process it was running appear to have hung, can't use ALT + F1,F2... to switch virtual consoles. However I can log in to the system via ssh, if you run top you get the same information on the console, can even interact with it, switching search order and the like. systat also seems to not display current information. I can do everything I have tried through the console except I noticed that syslog isn't writing data and a /etc/rc.d/syslog restart hung as well. This is just a test system running one single Java program (Ubiquiti UniFi controller software) that is responding just fine as well. Thought maybe it was disk access related, however I have confirmed that I can read and write to the disk, used dd if=/dev/random of=/.../random.out..., to each file system and was able to write to all of them. Before I reboot the system (I have a feeling it won't reboot cleanly), I was curious if anyone else has ever seen this and what I should check to possibly identify what caused the problem. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 22:24:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CEFC451 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:24:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0584A8FC15 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:24:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail.dweimer.net [192.168.5.1]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBCMOM4e039462 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:24:23 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:24:22 -0600 From: dweimer To: Subject: Re: 9.1 system hung with top open on console, yet responsive on ssh =?UTF-8?Q?sessions=3F?= Organization: dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <17622505fce802a8359c4a37f120f9bf@dweimer.net> References: <17622505fce802a8359c4a37f120f9bf@dweimer.net> Message-ID: <258779adcca4634d17cd2a4122ebbdea@dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:24:24 -0000 On 2012-12-12 15:58, dweimer wrote: > I ran into a weird one, have a 9.1 test system (virtual in VMWare > Workstation 9) that I left running logged into the console with top > running. The console the top process it was running appear to have > hung, can't use ALT + F1,F2... to switch virtual consoles. However I > can log in to the system via ssh, if you run top you get the same > information on the console, can even interact with it, switching > search order and the like. systat also seems to not display current > information. I can do everything I have tried through the console > except I noticed that syslog isn't writing data and a > /etc/rc.d/syslog > restart hung as well. > > This is just a test system running one single Java program (Ubiquiti > UniFi controller software) that is responding just fine as well. > Thought maybe it was disk access related, however I have confirmed > that I can read and write to the disk, used dd if=/dev/random > of=/.../random.out..., to each file system and was able to write to > all of them. Before I reboot the system (I have a feeling it won't > reboot cleanly), I was curious if anyone else has ever seen this and > what I should check to possibly identify what caused the problem. Might have discovered its probable related to as I noticed as well that that date command was always returning yesterdays date with the time set the same as top returned. I went ahead and reset the virtual machine with the sysctl value set as listed in the thread linked to above. will see if I hit the issue again or not. Though this application will be moved off this test system to my actual serve as soon as the 9.1-Release is official. so it may not be running long enough to know if that is the real solution. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 12 23:17:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E5CF17 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:17:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89FED8FC0A for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:17:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TivYf-0001vu-EZ for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:17:45 +0100 Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.21.186.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:17:45 +0100 Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:17:45 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Walter Hurry Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:17:20 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 51 Message-ID: References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C412F6.7040300@sdf.org> <201212090526.26535.lumiwa@gmail.com> <50C8CF77.2040102@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 30dc37b master) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:17:41 -0000 On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:39:51 +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 12/12/2012 17:38, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> If you use pkgng, please try editing /usr/local/sbin/pkg_libchk to >> replace "pkg_info" with "pkg info" in all locations and let me know how >> it works, . I'm hoping that will make it work with pkgng, but I have no >> way to check as I can't currently use pkgng on any of my systems, yet. > > I'd like to draw people's attention to one of the newer capabilities of > pkgng as it's directly relevant to this problem. You can use pkgng to > track which shared libraries are used by binaries in all packages. > Shared library use is determined by analysing the dynamic loading > information recorded in ELF binaries -- either executables or shared > libraries -- so it's pretty reliable. > > The feature is turned off by default, but you can enable it by adding: > > SHLIBS: YES > > to ${LOCALBASE}/etc/pkg.conf and then generate the shlib info by: > > pkg check -Ba > > This will take a while on a system with lots of packages installed: it > will investigate every file installed by every package. If you aren't > using a repo where the shlibs function is enabled, you'll have to use > pkg check thike this on any new pkgs you subsequently install. > > Then, for example, you can find all the pkgs with files that link > against, say, libssh2 by: > > worm:~:% pkg query -a "%n-%v %B" | grep libssh2 curl-7.24.0_1 > libssh2.so.1 That looks like a useful feature. But why is it saying this? pkg: (firefox-17.0.1,1) shared library libxpcom.so not found pkg: (firefox-17.0.1,1) shared library libmozalloc.so not found (lots more output snipped) $ locate libxpcom.so /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxpcom.so $ locate libmozalloc.so /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozalloc.so $ file /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxpcom.so /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxpcom.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked, stripped $ file /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozalloc.so /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozalloc.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked, stripped $ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 04:35:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8CEA99 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 04:35:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brian@brianwhalen.net) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E538FC13 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 04:35:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id wz12so1092142pbc.13 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:35:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=C+TpyWuRkG3uFUouNr7hlqf7zJCxomjiCgKUJVi/aac=; b=NQ0ilmCje4LBmxESo0dzGD8RYV0KWpqVMXnpfFol0oAEwVFV9wYqOYaJRNqLpQAlbu 354+BkO54TJnAHKsZexBozhSw1n/iR7PpUp8QGAFvI9+H7bArb8o5RGa0ECAQJ0gGPzU bqxoS41Bj+Bpa/E14jaFF25o0n9NnRc0U4mGZi49YfRy45dLPsqfLvPM+rrf6FhhR56e 5lGrljphEXy/MFg89KOFGuaNao3wwHs7Ng+RgctiqBVc9OnREm5e/EDHErT7zBgMxdYE /k0QqNzdsSdqV20Z0v2b+8LOqX+afDV9xOKUHGnLB8eDhSr/ARWpd/x5XKmznB7FmZkD K8LA== Received: by 10.66.88.99 with SMTP id bf3mr2588295pab.62.1355373342222; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:35:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.74] (76-252-236-89.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net. [76.252.236.89]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id zv10sm277254pbc.76.2012.12.12.20.35.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:35:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50C95B21.7060001@brianwhalen.net> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:35:45 -0800 From: Brian User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Walter Hurry , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C412F6.7040300@sdf.org> <201212090526.26535.lumiwa@gmail.com> <50C8CF77.2040102@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnG8osDakIKUOv3m1azqiyJFdDJ4LkQwLNvYvifUk7UGted7UJg/Nd0YDliISvF0TRejmT+ X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 04:35:42 -0000 A few hours ago I ran freebsd-update on a 9.1 RC3 VM system on an esxi server and got 9.1-RELEASE. I know there hasnt been an announcement but it would appear it is very close. Brian From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 06:29:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D1BC0A for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:29:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FFB18FC08 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBD6TGWm081926 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:29:17 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.1 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk qBD6TGWm081926 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/qBD6TGWm081926; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Message-ID: <50C975B3.7070701@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:29:07 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C412F6.7040300@sdf.org> <201212090526.26535.lumiwa@gmail.com> <50C8CF77.2040102@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig24DE7E1CD4C61A78BEE40309" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:29:21 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig24DE7E1CD4C61A78BEE40309 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/12/2012 23:17, Walter Hurry wrote: > That looks like a useful feature. But why is it saying this? >=20 > pkg: (firefox-17.0.1,1) shared library libxpcom.so not found > pkg: (firefox-17.0.1,1) shared library libmozalloc.so not found > (lots more output snipped) >=20 > $ locate libxpcom.so > /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxpcom.so > $ locate libmozalloc.so > /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozalloc.so > $ file /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxpcom.so > /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxpcom.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-6= 4,=20 > version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked, stripped > $ file /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozalloc.so > /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozalloc.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object,=20 > x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked, stripped > $=20 Ah -- that would be a bug. At a guess, it's not finding the shlibs because they're in a location not on the usual path and there's something odd about the RPATH settings in the binaries. I shall investigate further. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig24DE7E1CD4C61A78BEE40309 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDJdbwACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxsIwCfQnpEJDTT6jg9yx45EFhUbaCq g78An0nFWpnMlE870AIpkxxWF4uM8Uti =r9p6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig24DE7E1CD4C61A78BEE40309-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 07:31:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0374DBFC for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:31:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [84.237.50.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACEC8FC16 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tj3FP-0005xq-E8 for stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:30:23 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id qBD7V7Ae024953 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:31:07 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id qBD7UYTx024784 for stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:30:34 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:30:33 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot Message-ID: <20121213073033.GA19514@regency.nsu.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:31:17 -0000 Hey folks, Was going to try 9.1/amd64 on this Lenovo box with E5500 I have here at $work. Unfortunately it panics immediately upon boot [1]. Seems it be ACPI-related, as disabling it allows the boot to proceed a little further but still panic [2]. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS booted and worked just fine on this box, yet I could not get anywhere with any memstick.img since 8.0. Any idea what's going on here? I've tried dumping DSDT and rebuilding it, did not help. Verbose bootlogs can be found here: [1] http://193.124.210.26/9.1-acpi.dmesg [2] http://193.124.210.26/9.1-noacpi.dmesg ./danfe From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 07:37:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41186D47; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:37:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ea0-f182.google.com (mail-ea0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3D28FC12; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:37:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f182.google.com with SMTP id a14so567232eaa.13 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:37:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=RYMggbkKRMVRCnvajZgK4L/SMBVU0WsFCzKObHwlPZA=; b=b5pVp+x9jT5fHiQ3thXHno/Ks0I0sGClh8kPbMh31oPI6LnR/GaQ7mqdPwb+uBtrYH MD2+VzqvuBckxb5ZIOol9+ufmIyEge+5ygfzTufFXf4bHJVkb+osPWYiVz+WaPFukXMs t+ufFqok0Z9qu3Aj9ONqb7h01Kdlzrs6jW6S/H0dLdN/gwM7CyOQfuS7fvmFdNFlenUt MslnMEQ54sf7YRbQTKh9I+Apu1MLLVSQkZC5KxzPyvIIfn4r9Y7gn392fhShw5Li5/+K VfHqEMHRMPderc+u7Z/O5o/7tWR8MnX0vphcE7/yamcMNVAqYySmqFwSDFeuHK1kwEky 0djg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.221.5 with SMTP id q5mr2765037eep.33.1355384233207; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:37:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.198.71 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:37:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50C975B3.7070701@FreeBSD.org> References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C412F6.7040300@sdf.org> <201212090526.26535.lumiwa@gmail.com> <50C8CF77.2040102@FreeBSD.org> <50C975B3.7070701@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 01:37:13 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? From: Scot Hetzel To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:37:15 -0000 On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 12/12/2012 23:17, Walter Hurry wrote: >> That looks like a useful feature. But why is it saying this? >> >> pkg: (firefox-17.0.1,1) shared library libxpcom.so not found >> pkg: (firefox-17.0.1,1) shared library libmozalloc.so not found >> (lots more output snipped) >> >> $ locate libxpcom.so >> /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxpcom.so >> $ locate libmozalloc.so >> /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozalloc.so >> $ file /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxpcom.so >> /usr/local/lib/firefox/libxpcom.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, >> version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked, stripped >> $ file /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozalloc.so >> /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozalloc.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, >> x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked, stripped >> $ > > Ah -- that would be a bug. At a guess, it's not finding the shlibs > because they're in a location not on the usual path and there's > something odd about the RPATH settings in the binaries. I shall > investigate further. > This same issue with firefox was reported in this PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131237 And included a simple fix which was rejected by the firefox maintainer due to firefox sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH at runtime to find its share libraries. -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were maimed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 07:54:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D98538; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:54:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmg@h2.funkthat.com) Received: from h2.funkthat.com (gate2.funkthat.com [208.87.223.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895968FC16; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:54:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2.funkthat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by h2.funkthat.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qBD7Yx6C025140 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:34:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmg@h2.funkthat.com) Received: (from jmg@localhost) by h2.funkthat.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id qBD7Yxqw025139; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:34:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmg) Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:34:58 -0800 From: John-Mark Gurney To: Jim Harris Subject: Re: tws bug ? (LSI SAS 9750) Message-ID: <20121213073458.GB1563@funkthat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Harris , Jim Harris , Mike Tancsa , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , delphij@freebsd.org References: <505CC8EC.4030608@sentex.net> <505CE601.4070106@sentex.net> <505D0846.8050108@sentex.net> <20121026201819.GF1563@funkthat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE i386 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 54BA 873B 6515 3F10 9E88 9322 9CB1 8F74 6D3F A396 X-Files: The truth is out there X-URL: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/ X-Resume: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/resume.html X-to-the-FBI-CIA-and-NSA: HI! HOW YA DOIN? can i haz chizburger? X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (h2.funkthat.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:34:59 -0800 (PST) Cc: delphij@freebsd.org, Jim Harris , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:54:18 -0000 Jim Harris wrote this message on Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 13:24 -0700: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 1:18 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > > > I'm seeing similar stuff on the hpt27xx driver: > > (probe18:hpt27xx0:0:18:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 0 0 0 24 0 > > (probe18:hpt27xx0:0:18:0): CAM status: Invalid Target ID > > (probe18:hpt27xx0:0:18:0): Error 22, Unretryable error > > > > Should I make a similar change in sys/dev/hpt27xx/osm_bsd.c? Looks like > > there are two CAM_TID_INVALID lines, but from reading the comments, only > > the second one should change... > > > > Correct? If so, I'll try making the change and make sure everything > > works well. > > > > Yes - I agree that a similar change is needed, and only to the second > one in that file. Ok, I've tested a patch, and so far things look much better... It shuts up all the bad probe messges... Though I ran across a bug where the card went out to lunch giving these messages: (da2:hpt27xx0:0:2:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 a5 4c ae d8 0 0 58 0 (da2:hpt27xx0:0:2:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error (da2:hpt27xx0:0:2:0): SCSI status: OK (da3:hpt27xx0:0:3:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 a5 4c b9 f0 0 0 50 0 (da3:hpt27xx0:0:3:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error (da3:hpt27xx0:0:3:0): SCSI status: OK Scott Long suggested the first part of the patch so that an error is actually generated... Though it would be good for the sense data to be set, but not sure where to get it... Index: osm_bsd.c =================================================================== --- osm_bsd.c (revision 241041) +++ osm_bsd.c (working copy) @@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ ccb->ccb_h.status = CAM_BUSY; break; default: - ccb->ccb_h.status = CAM_SCSI_STATUS_ERROR; + ccb->ccb_h.status = CAM_AUTOSENSE_FAIL; break; } @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ vd = ldm_find_target(vbus, ccb->ccb_h.target_id); if (!vd) { - ccb->ccb_h.status = CAM_TID_INVALID; + ccb->ccb_h.status = CAM_SEL_TIMEOUT; xpt_done(ccb); return; } -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not." From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 08:29:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1059BFDF for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:29:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9248FC0A for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rufus.webfusion.com (mail.heartinternet.co.uk [79.170.40.31]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBD8Te1C083947 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:29:48 GMT (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.1 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk qBD8Te1C083947 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/qBD8Te1C083947; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host mail.heartinternet.co.uk [79.170.40.31] claimed to be rufus.webfusion.com Message-ID: <50C991F3.3040307@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:29:39 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scot Hetzel Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C412F6.7040300@sdf.org> <201212090526.26535.lumiwa@gmail.com> <50C8CF77.2040102@FreeBSD.org> <50C975B3.7070701@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:29:59 -0000 On 13/12/2012 07:37, Scot Hetzel wrote: > This same issue with firefox was reported in this PR: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131237 > > And included a simple fix which was rejected by the firefox maintainer > due to firefox sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH at runtime to find its share > libraries. Unfortunately it seems to be a fairly common effect in some large projects. Other packages showing the same symptoms: thunderbird (yeah -- that one was predictable...) openjdk6 virtualbox-ose ... and that's just out of what's installed on my desktop: by no means comprehensive. As far as I can tell from a quick check, openjdk6 doesn't rely on setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the environment. I've raised issue #403 in pkgng Github. Cheers, Matthew From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 09:02:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DCD92C for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:02:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andriy.kornatskyy@live.com) Received: from dub0-omc4-s20.dub0.hotmail.com (dub0-omc4-s20.dub0.hotmail.com [157.55.2.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B7A8FC16 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:02:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DUB117-W42 ([157.55.2.71]) by dub0-omc4-s20.dub0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 13 Dec 2012 01:01:17 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [194.44.213.194] X-EIP: [dQQu+1SMEnqYoKJRBMUBPRU+NAdWYjvq] X-Originating-Email: [andriy.kornatskyy@live.com] Message-ID: From: Andriy Kornatskyy To: Subject: RE: How to create Jail in FreeBSD Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:01:17 +0300 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <50C88F15.2090703@sentex.net> References: , <50C881ED.2040407@sentex.net> ,<50C88F15.2090703@sentex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Dec 2012 09:01:17.0524 (UTC) FILETIME=[696FA140:01CDD910] Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:02:25 -0000 Per jail raw sockets are not available with 9.1-RC3 yet (just checked). I g= uess you mean it will be available with 9.1 release. Andriy ---------------------------------------- > Date: Wed=2C 12 Dec 2012 09:05:09 -0500 > From: mike@sentex.net > To: andriy.kornatskyy@live.com > CC: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: How to create Jail in FreeBSD > > On 12/12/2012 8:31 AM=2C Andriy Kornatskyy wrote: > > Unfortunately=2C this doesn't work per jail (FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3)...= not ready yet? > > Hi=2C > The change when in post 9.0 and is in RELENG_9 and will be in 9.1R > > ---Mike > > > > > ---------------------------------------- > >> Date: Wed=2C 12 Dec 2012 08:09:01 -0500 > >> From: mike@sentex.net > >> To: andriy.kornatskyy@live.com > >> Subject: Re: How to create Jail in FreeBSD > >> CC: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > >> > >> On 12/12/2012 5:47 AM=2C Andriy Kornatskyy wrote: > >>> > >>> http://mindref.blogspot.com/2012/12/freebsd-jail.html > >>> > >>> Comments or suggestions are welcome. > >> > >> Hi=2C > >> Perhaps a note that > >> > >> sysctl security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=3D1 > >> > >> no longer works on RELENG_9 > >> > >> you need to do it on a per jail basis it seems. > >> > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D173469 > >> > >> and > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/2012-November/001989.h= tml > >> discuss it further > >> > >> > >> -- > >> ------------------- > >> Mike Tancsa=2C tel +1 519 651 3400 > >> Sentex Communications=2C mike@sentex.net > >> Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net > >> Cambridge=2C Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > >> To unsubscribe=2C send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd= .org" > > > > > > > > > -- > ------------------- > Mike Tancsa=2C tel +1 519 651 3400 > Sentex Communications=2C mike@sentex.net > Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net > Cambridge=2C Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/ = From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 10:19:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D0A643 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:19:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402348FC0A for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:19:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id MAA13606; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:19:13 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <50C9ABA0.20009@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:19:12 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dokuchaev Subject: Re: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot References: <20121213073033.GA19514@regency.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <20121213073033.GA19514@regency.nsu.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:19:19 -0000 on 13/12/2012 09:30 Alexey Dokuchaev said the following: > Hey folks, > > Was going to try 9.1/amd64 on this Lenovo box with E5500 I have here at > $work. Unfortunately it panics immediately upon boot [1]. Seems it be > ACPI-related, as disabling it allows the boot to proceed a little further > but still panic [2]. Just a general note that nowadays booting without ACPI especially on laptops would not get you very far in 99% cases. IMO, it's pointless to try. > Ubuntu 12.04 LTS booted and worked just fine on this box, yet I could > not get anywhere with any memstick.img since 8.0. Any idea what's going > on here? I've tried dumping DSDT and rebuilding it, did not help. > > Verbose bootlogs can be found here: > > [1] http://193.124.210.26/9.1-acpi.dmesg > [2] http://193.124.210.26/9.1-noacpi.dmesg Will you be able to try head on this system? This could have been fixed in more recent ACPICA imports. stable/9 seems have ACPICA from many months ago. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 10:26:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8BAAB5; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:26:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [84.237.50.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4C58FC1A; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tj5zY-0007mk-2r; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:26:12 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id qBDAQvt7052151; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:26:57 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id qBDAQqCq052099; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:26:52 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:26:51 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot Message-ID: <20121213102651.GA51050@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20121213073033.GA19514@regency.nsu.ru> <50C9ABA0.20009@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50C9ABA0.20009@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:26:15 -0000 On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:19:12PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > Just a general note that nowadays booting without ACPI especially on > laptops would not get you very far in 99% cases. > IMO, it's pointless to try. I know, I just wanted to isolate a problem. > Will you be able to try head on this system? > This could have been fixed in more recent ACPICA imports. stable/9 seems > have ACPICA from many months ago. Do we have memstick.img snapshots for -CURRENT somewhere? Can only boot via USB this time. ./danfe From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 10:36:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A8EF3E; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:36:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onyx.glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:c200::face]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7698FC16; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:36:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (kaos.glenbarber.us [71.224.221.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by onyx.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAD2123F75F; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 05:36:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 05:36:35 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: Alexey Dokuchaev Subject: Re: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot Message-ID: <20121213103635.GG1325@glenbarber.us> References: <20121213073033.GA19514@regency.nsu.ru> <50C9ABA0.20009@FreeBSD.org> <20121213102651.GA51050@regency.nsu.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0NB0lE7sNnW8+0qW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121213102651.GA51050@regency.nsu.ru> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, Andriy Gapon X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:36:40 -0000 --0NB0lE7sNnW8+0qW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:26:51PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > Do we have memstick.img snapshots for -CURRENT somewhere? Can only boot > via USB this time. >=20 https://snapshots.glenbarber.us/Latest/ It is a few days behind though. Glen --0NB0lE7sNnW8+0qW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQya+zAAoJEFJPDDeguUajhHIH/ivBj/anjQPUwES5ce4dNX2H IR3lkVYk9L4qcXqgJU8itu62mE4L9l8bh1MSsHxhAUPWBmMxqTtQ4uVWklnOMxAv TVT0X0GHrVvhPjVaK0qJpebAUGbGLs23xHseNcZYjrZ1YdUnFaq+2a255z/QwY/a 0ItuzX3Ektbfzp9ts8Z21kU7tddmUvxtGgWpKA2ySgXUA+aZHcI4xfOzg6MQ9szP WaO1OG1PauQILfHi4g4M1oWASBSpagAu1UNTqjgI/5/aN33ohWBIyNBnzLX2ttzk zjMVGPEF6QmP5lPWhVOWyxVV/XvSZCBTXdZYjVu7K2U5yY1Tkz+ulo+HtkpXTuI= =9JLW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0NB0lE7sNnW8+0qW-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 10:36:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B0EC8; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:36:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6BA18FC0C; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:36:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id MAA13845; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:36:54 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <50C9AFC6.6080902@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:36:54 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: olivier olivier Subject: Re: NFS/ZFS hangs after upgrading from 9.0-RELEASE to -STABLE References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:36:58 -0000 I decided to share here the comment that I made in private, so that more people could potentially benefit from it. on 03/12/2012 20:41 olivier olivier said the following: > Hi all > After upgrading from 9.0-RELEASE to 9.1-PRERELEASE #0 r243679 I'm having > severe problems with NFS sharing of a ZFS volume. nfsd appears to hang at > random times (between once every couple hours to once every two days) while > accessing a ZFS volume, and the only way I have found of resolving the > problem is to reboot. The server console is sometimes still responsive > during the nfsd hang, and I can read and write files to the same ZFS volume > while nfsd is hung. I am pasting below the output of procstat -kk on nfsd, > and details of my pool (nfsstat on the server gets hung when the problem > has started occurring, and does not produce any output). The pool is v28 > and was created from a bunch of volumes attached over Fibre Channel using > the mpt driver. My system has a Supermicro board and 4 AMD Opteron 6274 > CPUs. > > I did not experience any nfsd hangs with 9.0-RELEASE (same machine, > essentially same configuration, same usage pattern). > > I would greatly appreciate any help to resolve this problem! I've looked at the provided data and I do not see anything that implicates ZFS. My rules of the thumb for ZFS hangs: - if there are threads in zio_wait - if you can firm that they are indeed stuck there[*] - if there are no threads in zio_interrupt [*] you have to be sure that a thread just sits in zio_wait and doesn't make any forward progress as opposed to the thread doing a lot of I/O and thus having a high probability of being seen in zio_wait. Then it is most likely that the problem is at the storage level. Most likely it is a bug in storage controller driver which allowed an I/O request to get lost (instead of "errored out" or timed out). `camcontrol tags -v` can be used to query depth of a queue for each disk and determine the bad one. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 12:12:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B0A9E7 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:12:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from victor@bsdes.net) Received: from equilibrium.bsdes.net (244.Red-217-126-240.staticIP.rima-tde.net [217.126.240.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D258FC17 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:12:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by equilibrium.bsdes.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 857C639847; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:05:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:05:32 +0100 From: Victor Balada Diaz To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: gjournal + HAST data lost Message-ID: <20121213120532.GW1414@equilibrium.bsdes.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:12:25 -0000 Hello, We've experienced a weird data "rollback" on our NFS servers. We have two NFS servers. Both running 8.3-RELEASE-p3. We've setup HAST for one partition between both of them. To be able to switch fast we configured gjournal on top of HAST. At the time there was no UFS+J. Yesterday one of the servers crashed and CARP changed the slave to master. During that operation we got the following error: GEOM_JOURNAL: Journal 2180207123: hast/shared contains data. GEOM_JOURNAL: Journal 2180207123: hast/shared contains journal. GEOM_JOURNAL: Cannot decode journal header from hast/shared. GEOM_JOURNAL: Journal on hast/shared is broken/corrupted. Initializing. GEOM_JOURNAL: clean=1 flags=0x40 GEOM_JOURNAL: File system hast/shared marked as dirty. Did a full fsck and no errors were detected. The filesystem was working again. After looking at the data we saw that all the files in the last days were missing. Like if both servers were disconnected, but that didn't happen. Even more: after our first NFS server was up again, no split-brain condition was detected. We're sure the first NFS server was working because all of the data is on the backup servers. So it's not like the data never got written. What could explain that data rollback? If gjournal's journal is lost it's possible to lose the data of a few days ago? Is not recommended to use gjournal with HAST? Thanks a lot. Regards. Victor. hast.conf: replication fullsync #compression lzf #checksum sha256 on nfs01 { listen 192.168.23.81 } on nfs02 { listen 192.168.23.82 } resource shared { name shared local /dev/mirror/oss1g on nfs01 { remote 192.168.23.82 } on nfs02 { remote 192.168.23.81 } } -- La prueba más fehaciente de que existe vida inteligente en otros planetas, es que no han intentado contactar con nosotros. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 14:14:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D671FA2C; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:14:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org) Received: from duck.symmetricom.us (duck.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB5B8FC17; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from damnhippie.dyndns.org (daffy.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.218]) by duck.symmetricom.us (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBDEE2oD068957; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:14:02 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org) Received: from [172.22.42.240] (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240]) by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qBDEDxYF057893; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:13:59 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org) Subject: Re: /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh, SYSDIR set to wrong directory. From: Ian Lepore To: Kimmo Paasiala In-Reply-To: References: <1355331231.87661.461.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:13:59 -0700 Message-ID: <1355408039.87661.491.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:14:03 -0000 On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 20:52 +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Ian Lepore > wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 18:14 +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> My 9-STABLE buildworld broke in a very inexplicable way, I was > >> getting an error on /usr/src/include/osreldate.h that I couldn't > >> figure out until I started looking at the sys/conf/newvers.sh and what > >> it does. It turned out that the thing that broke my buildworld was > >> having .git directory at the root directory of the system because I > >> recently started using GIT to track the configuration files. > >> > >> I added some debug echos to the newvers.sh and I found out it's > >> setting SYSDIR to /bin/.. which in turn causes the newvers.sh to set > >> the gitdir to /.git and that seems to break the logic in newvers.sh. > >> > >> Isn't SYSDIR supposed to be set to the sys -subdirectory of the source > >> tree (/usr/src/sys default)? > >> > >> I'm guessing the reason the SYSDIR gets set to /bin/.. is the line in > >> newvers.sh: > >> > >> SYSDIR=$(dirname $0)/.. > >> > >> $0 is actually /bin/sh and not the path to newver.sh because the > >> newvers.sh is sourced by the Makefile in /usr/src/include instead of > >> executing it: > >> > >> osreldate.h: ${.CURDIR}/../sys/conf/newvers.sh ${.CURDIR}/../sys/sys/param.h \ > >> ${.CURDIR}/Makefile > >> @${ECHO} creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh > >> @MAKE=${MAKE}; \ > >> PARAMFILE=${.CURDIR}/../sys/sys/param.h; \ > >> . ${.CURDIR}/../sys/conf/newvers.sh; \ > >> > >> Now the question is how to fix this? > >> > >> -Kimmo > > > > Perhaps it could be handled similar to PARAMFILE, something like this in > > the makefile: > > > > PARAMFILE=${.CURDIR}/../sys/sys/param.h; \ > > SYSDIR=${.CURDIR}/../sys; \ > > . ${.CURDIR}/../sys/conf/newvers.sh; \ > > > > I'm not sure if newvers.sh needs to work in ways that don't involve > > being invoked from that makefile rule, so to be safe it could have > > default handling, something like: > > > > : ${SYSDIR:=$(dirname $0)/..} > > > > -- Ian > > > > > > Thanks, that works. Should I file a PR about this? > > -Kimmo I think that would probably be a good idea, since no committer has chimed in on this thread saying they're about to commit a fix. -- Ian From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 16:15:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E36FB54A; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from kabab.cs.huji.ac.il (kabab.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ACC48FC15; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by kabab.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1TjBI7-0002Zy-NK; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:05:43 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: igb issues Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:05:43 +0200 From: Daniel Braniss Message-ID: Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:15:09 -0000 hi, I'm trying out a 4way Dell PowerEdge C5125/AMD server with onboard Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection version - 2.3.1 when running FreeBsd 8.3 (from sometime around Nov 2) all is ok. with latest (at least Fridays') 9.1-PRERELEASE it's getting 'constipated'. It seems that NFS writes slowdown to a halt, and so I'm getting 'not responding' errors. I am using the same kernel on different hosts with out any problems, even with Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection version - 2.3.4 Any ideas? danny From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 17:00:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D00C2ED; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:00:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006F88FC12; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l1so2643088vba.13 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:00:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=SPoUhDujy35hd39TFAPq1PpYsacpLIeX8ky3kerzuPQ=; b=e6NCSUiQlCfSgxt/Hj3gggAs7Wc62IRF4IbVJoAfMHhIrewGsptcHrfgCEEgB8r3LL Ljl2wM6i8CKujkEgl3T28umQL0oV/GmbihfyR901+n2utkRXhvDIQvNxIduEfw10g71c 9VZftIpW3FOSNR7kXjLd1Cusf0yPqCOlBVJaoZ7eCKwVA8GsSlAXWh38Y25rCSoU6S+E 8+zXhhzn4mgmDIaKzIzWgOdOulzgyb0kp/MFlvYK3bSwm+TFe1/1nfJyCX6SvR1WVbje 4IWkjvMnltqVjUebqfgby4a/UT/OMKo7j7MWz9aUAq6Xwfi51iMg2NWk6ixB9MZ7ZGu+ 3kMw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.240.146 with SMTP id wa18mr3980042vdc.47.1355418033055; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:00:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.50.6 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:00:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:00:32 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: igb issues From: Jack Vogel To: Daniel Braniss Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:00:34 -0000 Try putting the driver from 9.1 back onto 8.3 and see if you still see a problem. That will indicate if its in the driver or the stack/OS. If you have any question about doing this send me email. Is NFS using UDP or TCP? Regards, Jack On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote: > hi, > I'm trying out a 4way Dell PowerEdge C5125/AMD server with onboard > Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection version - 2.3.1 > > when running FreeBsd 8.3 (from sometime around Nov 2) all is ok. > with latest (at least Fridays') 9.1-PRERELEASE it's getting 'constipated'. > > It seems that NFS writes slowdown to a halt, and so I'm getting 'not > responding' errors. > > I am using the same kernel on different hosts with out any problems, > even with Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection version - 2.3.4 > > Any ideas? > > danny > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 17:46:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D7DF1E; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:46:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivier777a7@gmail.com) Received: from mail-da0-f54.google.com (mail-da0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF7C8FC0A; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:46:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-da0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n2so879137dad.13 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:46:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=d63E96/6160OLuVcKEgRLI9BksImtpZrzihnFDIb9Cs=; b=JjQxTfDP4AKXnqM/YL2NgjD74nFs31qT8WyfTYQWvjNVy/OnbTeP32797INyCx2PEX NoHUnRP33qVuEaLGwyfftnK8mEruGxUu0XcUSGweYk/IlQnN6CRZq5TFOXVI1iHkTfmq R2mfsec+2vusnipQwCpkEppaoImHrMJL9nL4mss6jeOuPmL/Zp4TgDwJ4SNE468kfscg ZZtTtR31awZc6+fMZatF9teTCX4m7mvyD49MFgH865TpAPsu9xlCcQKOAsHqT7JOXjB7 IFpWQKkYYCR65u7nUUmZC+U8owQYMDFtCKOQZEX+e3UtppvUluGIqTjuVnwmdHToUW1R /5pw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.204.103 with SMTP id kx7mr7773087pbc.33.1355420795250; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:46:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.148.136 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:46:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50C9AFC6.6080902@FreeBSD.org> References: <50C9AFC6.6080902@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:46:35 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NFS/ZFS hangs after upgrading from 9.0-RELEASE to -STABLE From: olivier To: Andriy Gapon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:46:46 -0000 Thanks. I'll be sure to follow your suggestions next time this happens. I have a naive question/suggestion though. I see from browsing past discussions on ZFS problems that it has been suggested a number of times that problems that appear to originate in ZFS in fact come from lower layers; in particular because of driver bugs or disks in the process of failing. It seems that it can take a lot of time to troubleshoot such problems. I accept that ZFS behavior correctly leaves dealing with timeouts to lower layers, but it seems to me that the ZFS layer would be a great place to warn the user about issues and provide some information to troubleshoot them. For example, if some I/O requests get lost because of a buggy driver, the driver itself might not be the best place to identify those lost requests. But perhaps we could have a compile time option in ZFS code that spits out a warning if it gets stuck waiting for a particular request to come back for more than say 10 seconds, and identifies the problematic disk? I'm sure there would be cases where these warnings would be unwarranted, and I imagine that changes in the code to provide such warnings would impact performance; so one certainly would not want that code active by default. But someone in my position could certainly recompile the kernel with a ZFS debugging option turned on to figure out the problem. I understand that ZFS code comes from upstream, and that you guys probably want to keep FreeBSD-specific changes minimal. If that's a big problem, even just a patch provided "as such" that does not make it into the FreeBSD code base might be extremely useful. I wish I could help write something like that, but I know very little about the kernel or ZFS. I would certainly be willing to help with testing. Just my 2 cents worth. Thanks for the help Olivier On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > I decided to share here the comment that I made in private, so that more > people > could potentially benefit from it. > > on 03/12/2012 20:41 olivier olivier said the following: > > Hi all > > After upgrading from 9.0-RELEASE to 9.1-PRERELEASE #0 r243679 I'm having > > severe problems with NFS sharing of a ZFS volume. nfsd appears to hang at > > random times (between once every couple hours to once every two days) > while > > accessing a ZFS volume, and the only way I have found of resolving the > > problem is to reboot. The server console is sometimes still responsive > > during the nfsd hang, and I can read and write files to the same ZFS > volume > > while nfsd is hung. I am pasting below the output of procstat -kk on > nfsd, > > and details of my pool (nfsstat on the server gets hung when the problem > > has started occurring, and does not produce any output). The pool is v28 > > and was created from a bunch of volumes attached over Fibre Channel using > > the mpt driver. My system has a Supermicro board and 4 AMD Opteron 6274 > > CPUs. > > > > I did not experience any nfsd hangs with 9.0-RELEASE (same machine, > > essentially same configuration, same usage pattern). > > > > I would greatly appreciate any help to resolve this problem! > > > I've looked at the provided data and I do not see anything that implicates > ZFS. > My rules of the thumb for ZFS hangs: > - if there are threads in zio_wait > - if you can firm that they are indeed stuck there[*] > - if there are no threads in zio_interrupt > > [*] you have to be sure that a thread just sits in zio_wait and doesn't > make any > forward progress as opposed to the thread doing a lot of I/O and thus > having a > high probability of being seen in zio_wait. > > Then it is most likely that the problem is at the storage level. > Most likely it is a bug in storage controller driver which allowed an I/O > request > to get lost (instead of "errored out" or timed out). > > `camcontrol tags -v` can be used to query depth of a queue for each > disk > and determine the bad one. > > -- > Andriy Gapon > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 17:54:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B9131A; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:54:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 414318FC08; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id TAA18521; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:54:02 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <50CA1639.1010409@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:54:01 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: olivier Subject: Re: NFS/ZFS hangs after upgrading from 9.0-RELEASE to -STABLE References: <50C9AFC6.6080902@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:54:06 -0000 on 13/12/2012 19:46 olivier said the following: > Thanks. I'll be sure to follow your suggestions next time this happens. > > I have a naive question/suggestion though. I see from browsing past discussions on > ZFS problems that it has been suggested a number of times that problems that > appear to originate in ZFS in fact come from lower layers; in particular because > of driver bugs or disks in the process of failing. It seems that it can take a lot > of time to troubleshoot such problems. I accept that ZFS behavior correctly leaves > dealing with timeouts to lower layers, but it seems to me that the ZFS layer would > be a great place to warn the user about issues and provide some information to > troubleshoot them. > > For example, if some I/O requests get lost because of a buggy driver, the driver > itself might not be the best place to identify those lost requests. But perhaps we > could have a compile time option in ZFS code that spits out a warning if it gets > stuck waiting for a particular request to come back for more than say 10 seconds, > and identifies the problematic disk? I'm sure there would be cases where these > warnings would be unwarranted, and I imagine that changes in the code to provide > such warnings would impact performance; so one certainly would not want that code > active by default. But someone in my position could certainly recompile the kernel > with a ZFS debugging option turned on to figure out the problem. > > I understand that ZFS code comes from upstream, and that you guys probably want to > keep FreeBSD-specific changes minimal. If that's a big problem, even just a patch > provided "as such" that does not make it into the FreeBSD code base might be > extremely useful. I wish I could help write something like that, but I know very > little about the kernel or ZFS. I would certainly be willing to help with testing. Google for "zfs deadman". This is already committed upstream and I think that it is imported into FreeBSD, but I am not sure... Maybe it's imported just into the vendor area and is not merged yet. So, when enabled this logic would panic a system as a way of letting know that something is wrong. You can read in the links why panic was selected for this job. And speaking FreeBSD-centric - I think that our CAM layer would be a perfect place to detect such issues in non-ZFS-specific way. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 18:14:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9002816; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:14:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivier777a7@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com (mail-pa0-f54.google.com [209.85.220.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A859E8FC0A; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id bi5so1625773pad.13 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:14:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=6g0nOaq98CKYWgII6U589p3f1nd+p0JLBaOiH3ur4K0=; b=0bGzf/ZWuD0qlbcKx7GezWr3ZHtaCp4Oq9q7t6DjD73Ji3ot1d2uCjpFEW0KmEKYqq xJGLYsP5QI0qDrqfWD56Px6SiCBz5zX6QWxmS0OLFMmRSvgBbDW4QoYrZYaBe3PDS8Ke Ce84g9rvNEL2O7HQZaCaHbH3uUVfkQGUAVe6SXkFAu5I+jBnus8ZVDSGWVHUWZBfdMtw 5QxZdBZfqL/v46Ak4BqkZxDIU2mh3aDqj8CRW+4Iknqvi0fcaLEuREZi8CqudF7tRKt5 Dk8IHNDYn2plkZCns0iFFrAYQp8noECLArPjJ+yFG83HLajTZ5WCoV8pn6K4E3SOz1mN jEGg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.132.34 with SMTP id or2mr7752908pbb.133.1355422443853; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:14:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.148.136 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:14:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50CA1639.1010409@FreeBSD.org> References: <50C9AFC6.6080902@FreeBSD.org> <50CA1639.1010409@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:14:03 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NFS/ZFS hangs after upgrading from 9.0-RELEASE to -STABLE From: olivier To: Andriy Gapon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:14:05 -0000 On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > Google for "zfs deadman". This is already committed upstream and I think > that it > is imported into FreeBSD, but I am not sure... Maybe it's imported just > into the > vendor area and is not merged yet. > Yes, that's exactly what I had in mind. The logic for panicking makes sense. As far as I can tell you're correct that deadman is in the vendor area but not merged. Any idea when it might make it into 9-STABLE? Thanks Olivier > So, when enabled this logic would panic a system as a way of letting know > that > something is wrong. You can read in the links why panic was selected for > this job. > > And speaking FreeBSD-centric - I think that our CAM layer would be a > perfect place > to detect such issues in non-ZFS-specific way. > > -- > Andriy Gapon > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 23:02:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CC03E9; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 23:02:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpaasial@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E524C8FC13; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 23:02:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id fy27so953129vcb.13 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:02:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=2WhDXU9I6UeHKeVCIgrfRRTIev7490qQixTgE47M/bw=; b=BS/wgXFoi37wQvZkZeWxJtst66S31xgvSuuEIOWZ0JFlh7LLc+vjHHiBeQSvTY+VI9 Whlr31Owg3ejGWnpmt7GkL4kyGPDID6Grx8oo1Y3GsgqTWjKpVbpu2/WGwWrzX8yoFxY nTSoWrUZ6NQ5xZ5EvIGEPaF6ZdNUhWkHNdqIH1Ud62tgVUzEc1+dk6WQy5GWllu4MLnP FUd7BDqp0RLoQs81Pr72YOqaOhhpvvB11JgQgHqD4YOxu5AtzmPCKT85ldd+WN/c5Icu MTk21U9YiDPcXTRTgxrtk7dBFXUoG3d8Tfez7n7+zQnPFkObZ7MTDIX/2G2DBlP7deLC Q99g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.65.105 with SMTP id w9mr6282155ves.54.1355439735705; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:02:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.209.163 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:02:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1355408039.87661.491.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> References: <1355331231.87661.461.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <1355408039.87661.491.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 01:02:15 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh, SYSDIR set to wrong directory. From: Kimmo Paasiala To: Ian Lepore Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 23:02:17 -0000 On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 20:52 +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Ian Lepore >> wrote: >> > On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 18:14 +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> My 9-STABLE buildworld broke in a very inexplicable way, I was >> >> getting an error on /usr/src/include/osreldate.h that I couldn't >> >> figure out until I started looking at the sys/conf/newvers.sh and what >> >> it does. It turned out that the thing that broke my buildworld was >> >> having .git directory at the root directory of the system because I >> >> recently started using GIT to track the configuration files. >> >> >> >> I added some debug echos to the newvers.sh and I found out it's >> >> setting SYSDIR to /bin/.. which in turn causes the newvers.sh to set >> >> the gitdir to /.git and that seems to break the logic in newvers.sh. >> >> >> >> Isn't SYSDIR supposed to be set to the sys -subdirectory of the source >> >> tree (/usr/src/sys default)? >> >> >> >> I'm guessing the reason the SYSDIR gets set to /bin/.. is the line in >> >> newvers.sh: >> >> >> >> SYSDIR=$(dirname $0)/.. >> >> >> >> $0 is actually /bin/sh and not the path to newver.sh because the >> >> newvers.sh is sourced by the Makefile in /usr/src/include instead of >> >> executing it: >> >> >> >> osreldate.h: ${.CURDIR}/../sys/conf/newvers.sh ${.CURDIR}/../sys/sys/param.h \ >> >> ${.CURDIR}/Makefile >> >> @${ECHO} creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh >> >> @MAKE=${MAKE}; \ >> >> PARAMFILE=${.CURDIR}/../sys/sys/param.h; \ >> >> . ${.CURDIR}/../sys/conf/newvers.sh; \ >> >> >> >> Now the question is how to fix this? >> >> >> >> -Kimmo >> > >> > Perhaps it could be handled similar to PARAMFILE, something like this in >> > the makefile: >> > >> > PARAMFILE=${.CURDIR}/../sys/sys/param.h; \ >> > SYSDIR=${.CURDIR}/../sys; \ >> > . ${.CURDIR}/../sys/conf/newvers.sh; \ >> > >> > I'm not sure if newvers.sh needs to work in ways that don't involve >> > being invoked from that makefile rule, so to be safe it could have >> > default handling, something like: >> > >> > : ${SYSDIR:=$(dirname $0)/..} >> > >> > -- Ian >> > >> > >> >> Thanks, that works. Should I file a PR about this? >> >> -Kimmo > > I think that would probably be a good idea, since no committer has > chimed in on this thread saying they're about to commit a fix. > > -- Ian > > Submitted as misc/174422. -Kimmo From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 01:35:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF1B99DD for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 01:35:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927178FC0A for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 01:35:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TjKBl-0001OD-0U for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:35:45 -0800 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:35:45 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1355448945008-5769224.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1355337941248-5768880.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1354015603346-5764584.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354271955297-5765495.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354912564145-5767462.post@n5.nabble.com> <50C25B8F.2010605@ose.nl> <1355068021135-5767808.post@n5.nabble.com> <1355068983136-5767809.post@n5.nabble.com> <20121211034618.H52305@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <1355165547540-5768186.post@n5.nabble.com> <1355337941248-5768880.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Help review the FAQ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 01:35:46 -0000 #uninstall-kerberos Uh? Reinstalling base will delete kerberos? I don't get this answer. I thought kerberos was part of base? -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5769224.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 01:50:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2B9B7A for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 01:50:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05AA8FC0C for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 01:50:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TjKQQ-00025l-9I for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:50:54 -0800 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:50:54 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1355449854281-5769225.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1355448945008-5769224.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1354271955297-5765495.post@n5.nabble.com> <1354912564145-5767462.post@n5.nabble.com> <50C25B8F.2010605@ose.nl> <1355068021135-5767808.post@n5.nabble.com> <1355068983136-5767809.post@n5.nabble.com> <20121211034618.H52305@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <1355165547540-5768186.post@n5.nabble.com> <1355337941248-5768880.post@n5.nabble.com> <1355448945008-5769224.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Help review the FAQ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 01:50:54 -0000 #xfree86-root There is no Xwrapper (x11/wrapper) in ports tree. (Port is expired, whole answer outdated.) #xconsole-failure Indeed xconsole throws such error, but not xterm -C. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5769225.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 03:02:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC3D4F1; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 03:02:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [84.237.50.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9298FC14; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 03:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TjLWy-0004WL-Ul; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:01:44 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id qBE32V9a017672; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:02:31 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id qBE329CM017643; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:02:09 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:02:09 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Glen Barber Subject: Re: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot Message-ID: <20121214030208.GA15080@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20121213073033.GA19514@regency.nsu.ru> <50C9ABA0.20009@FreeBSD.org> <20121213102651.GA51050@regency.nsu.ru> <20121213103635.GG1325@glenbarber.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121213103635.GG1325@glenbarber.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, Andriy Gapon X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 03:02:02 -0000 On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:36:35AM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: > > https://snapshots.glenbarber.us/Latest/ > > It is a few days behind though. I've tried 10.0 image from it; still getting (apparently the same) panic [1]. It seems that something is wrong with AML, but I cannot tell much without debug symbols. Glen, since you include kernel debugger in you snapshots, do you think you can ship those .symbols as well? :-) ./danfe [1] http://193.124.210.26/10.0-acpi.dmesg From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 03:07:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270DF6C5; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 03:07:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onyx.glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:c200::face]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDEC68FC08; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 03:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (kaos.glenbarber.us [71.224.221.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by onyx.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70E4723F762; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 22:07:49 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.1 onyx.glenbarber.us 70E4723F762 Authentication-Results: onyx.glenbarber.us; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 22:07:47 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: Alexey Dokuchaev Subject: Re: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot Message-ID: <20121214030747.GC1280@glenbarber.us> References: <20121213073033.GA19514@regency.nsu.ru> <50C9ABA0.20009@FreeBSD.org> <20121213102651.GA51050@regency.nsu.ru> <20121213103635.GG1325@glenbarber.us> <20121214030208.GA15080@regency.nsu.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2JFBq9zoW8cOFH7v" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121214030208.GA15080@regency.nsu.ru> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, Andriy Gapon X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 03:07:51 -0000 --2JFBq9zoW8cOFH7v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:02:09AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:36:35AM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: > >=20 > > https://snapshots.glenbarber.us/Latest/ > >=20 > > It is a few days behind though. >=20 > I've tried 10.0 image from it; still getting (apparently the same) panic = [1]. > It seems that something is wrong with AML, but I cannot tell much without > debug symbols. Glen, since you include kernel debugger in you snapshots, > do you think you can ship those .symbols as well? :-) >=20 They are included in the ISO. root@:/usr/freebsd-dist # tar tvf kernel.txz | grep symbols | head -n2 = =20 -r-xr-xr-x 0 root wheel 143976 Dec 6 14:17 ./boot/kernel/if_rue.ko.symb= ols=20 -r-xr-xr-x 0 root wheel 244856 Dec 6 14:16 ./boot/kernel/ng_hci.ko.symb= ols Glen --2JFBq9zoW8cOFH7v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQypgDAAoJEFJPDDeguUajhOgH/1RdsHnAT8FsITs1RM1y/YKV Q2dgl+gdQo/0yOuE+FxflYn5UVJy+OhzpIZecOdoBAFPQajjSya51p7etnPWK2v3 ot4+3+0QYHEe46/P2y/WG+0hBRR0gOdwx4otjMTkAqNbJCtJfNCeiVqWcQhklPsB q8nzzGcx1qQXNJMosQ/MztMdHDZGCT7n1F/UPc0Ou8mTCP9dVhKM4QqIwQFhJLTr dveq9JDxpe91jNcQHcD1HEIKp6M0IuwDLhAY61s1L5BicltZvkAp7l8f+BBkWYXX mmZSW9z4csPNEJR0DyDZUDUDGuPXwrw5z8qnXUSS7+zdgoyKwj/bc/C28EtCGJY= =VvQ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2JFBq9zoW8cOFH7v-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 03:23:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2FCC49; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 03:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onyx.glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:c200::face]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7F58FC13; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 03:23:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (kaos.glenbarber.us [71.224.221.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by onyx.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0159623F762; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 22:23:51 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.1 onyx.glenbarber.us 0159623F762 Authentication-Results: onyx.glenbarber.us; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 22:23:49 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: Alexey Dokuchaev Subject: Re: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot Message-ID: <20121214032349.GD1280@glenbarber.us> References: <20121213073033.GA19514@regency.nsu.ru> <50C9ABA0.20009@FreeBSD.org> <20121213102651.GA51050@regency.nsu.ru> <20121213103635.GG1325@glenbarber.us> <20121214030208.GA15080@regency.nsu.ru> <20121214030747.GC1280@glenbarber.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121214030747.GC1280@glenbarber.us> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, Andriy Gapon X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 03:23:53 -0000 --1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:07:47PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: > They are included in the ISO. >=20 Meh... I did not pay attention to the subject too closely, it seems. If the memstick panics, I am not sure how much good the kernel symbols will do for you. I cannot build them into the memstick without changing the Makefiles, which I intentionally do not do so the images are what you would expect from a -RELEASE ISO. But, the debugging symbols are available in the FTP-style hierarchy here: https://snapshots.glenbarber.us/Latest/ftp/10-CURRENT/amd64/amd64/ https://snapshots.glenbarber.us/Latest/ftp/10-CURRENT/i386/i386/ Glen --1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQypvFAAoJEFJPDDeguUajbccH/3cv+zB7fuPWFk2lpUCDxqwg dQioDt5d70Dl+oBMre3kl/MdPMX75agPsHWNa72nApAUTKUynAeQpTh4OADMuvsb IsZvVjStPsOe0x1fJqdgPiSeUS/y7dw4WVCSJPJnAVKcTAJm5Z36zwFjAMbUCDuG AHlXjhiLDTf1MFlo0TpUgoJ4+7x5R1dRcJQKrnGdB8iN7WAFeiUbXWlgOJlm8t5M Cy4gNnPwfhyvhdVLeKyKGKl4sSIKquLx1X0Y/22XpSzTnt2CrNSPeY2P4Rc04YKw K49S3wPJ9DuOzps6zC+jFAu2YzLhZFLR3+7cuD5qC9ZATQpvAF7HM9ACcw/3pRQ= =uts5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1sNVjLsmu1MXqwQ/-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 03:40:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B26BFCD; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 03:40:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [84.237.50.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164928FC12; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 03:40:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TjM8E-0005CL-Rw; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:40:14 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id qBE3f1Us024901; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:41:01 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id qBE3euGh024846; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:40:56 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:40:56 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Glen Barber Subject: Re: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot Message-ID: <20121214034056.GA22963@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20121213073033.GA19514@regency.nsu.ru> <50C9ABA0.20009@FreeBSD.org> <20121213102651.GA51050@regency.nsu.ru> <20121213103635.GG1325@glenbarber.us> <20121214030208.GA15080@regency.nsu.ru> <20121214030747.GC1280@glenbarber.us> <20121214032349.GD1280@glenbarber.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121214032349.GD1280@glenbarber.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, Andriy Gapon X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 03:40:37 -0000 On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:23:49PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:07:47PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: > > They are included in the ISO. > > > > Meh... I did not pay attention to the subject too closely, it seems. > > If the memstick panics, I am not sure how much good the kernel symbols > will do for you. I cannot build them into the memstick without changing > the Makefiles, which I intentionally do not do so the images are what > you would expect from a -RELEASE ISO. It's OK, as long as they are provided, I should be able to modify the memstick contents (like, after rw-mounted it) and copy debug-enabled kernel in /boot. Not need to regenerate anything on your side, thanks! ./danfe From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 06:14:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0792D3C; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 06:14:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivier777a7@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com (mail-pa0-f54.google.com [209.85.220.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853A88FC0C; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 06:14:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id bi5so1975695pad.13 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 22:14:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=lD8ye38yOiC5Jllvu4GChUMBUnwpuV1W3TwPBjmwkdc=; b=l0hy/U0D9YWmYjHUsUOU5DX/DfSx9KYWHGCq33K/ReOdpXQWW9TMfSNxn//mtRmMsP yAbnjfbPby1d8tayMjeiOkmvesPz/xhG6oVkCPpcWsenBYWWCyucQHR5LR2XC9kpggMO INapMSGn2/cLBqAL6TMsrV4pnQ46Ss5B/CBqJg1pIMtj1xqMMscmuLUAhPtS6f4PdaDE xIXUtaWXJ9j5BhnY0UbMyFSdLyFXC1/oJ3TwFBkWQ9mvIgWT6NPcJIdre/rJ8CqxHcV3 qbSJuoDPMBdnLl7idpOv9nn+JoP7PULB3AMFyddbfzwprCGC5KtgXEpa6I+JpjDAwDFM AiuQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.238.165 with SMTP id vl5mr13179584pbc.0.1355465655907; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 22:14:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.148.136 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 22:14:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <50C9AFC6.6080902@FreeBSD.org> <50CA1639.1010409@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 22:14:15 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NFS/ZFS hangs after upgrading from 9.0-RELEASE to -STABLE From: olivier To: Andriy Gapon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, ken@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kashyap.Desai@lsi.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 06:14:17 -0000 For what it's worth, I think I might have solved my problem by reverting to an older version of the mps driver. I checked out a recent version of 9-STABLE and reversed the changes in http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=230592 (perhaps there was a simpler way of reverting to the older mps driver). So far so good, no hang even when hammering the file system. This does not conclusively prove that the new LSI mps driver is at fault, but that seems to be a likely explanation. Thanks to everybody who pointed me in the right direction. Hope this helps others who run into similar problems with 9.1 Olivier On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:14 AM, olivier wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> Google for "zfs deadman". This is already committed upstream and I think >> that it >> is imported into FreeBSD, but I am not sure... Maybe it's imported just >> into the >> vendor area and is not merged yet. >> > > Yes, that's exactly what I had in mind. The logic for panicking makes > sense. > As far as I can tell you're correct that deadman is in the vendor area but > not merged. Any idea when it might make it into 9-STABLE? > Thanks > Olivier > > > > >> So, when enabled this logic would panic a system as a way of letting know >> that >> something is wrong. You can read in the links why panic was selected for >> this job. >> >> And speaking FreeBSD-centric - I think that our CAM layer would be a >> perfect place >> to detect such issues in non-ZFS-specific way. >> >> -- >> Andriy Gapon >> > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 08:04:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20024495; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:04:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [84.237.50.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B478FC16; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:04:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TjQFc-00067U-4I; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:04:08 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id qBE84uCu067143; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:04:56 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id qBE84pIY067118; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:04:51 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:04:50 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Glen Barber Subject: Re: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot Message-ID: <20121214080450.GA63557@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20121213073033.GA19514@regency.nsu.ru> <50C9ABA0.20009@FreeBSD.org> <20121213102651.GA51050@regency.nsu.ru> <20121213103635.GG1325@glenbarber.us> <20121214030208.GA15080@regency.nsu.ru> <20121214030747.GC1280@glenbarber.us> <20121214032349.GD1280@glenbarber.us> <20121214034056.GA22963@regency.nsu.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121214034056.GA22963@regency.nsu.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, Andriy Gapon X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:04:38 -0000 On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:40:56AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:23:49PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: > > If the memstick panics, I am not sure how much good the kernel symbols > > will do for you. > > It's OK, as long as they are provided, I should be able to modify the > memstick contents (like, after rw-mounted it) and copy debug-enabled > kernel in /boot. On the second thought (try, actually) they are not too much helpful indeed, as I cannot get crashdump for post-mortem analysis (when symbols become useful), since panic happens so early debugger apparently has no idea of where to store the dump. It seems I have to debug it the hard way (hello printf's). Is it possible to cross build amd64 10.0 kernels on i386 8.3 machine? ./danfe From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 08:21:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF7D8FA; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:21:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from kabab.cs.huji.ac.il (kabab.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6DA8FC12; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by kabab.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1TjQWE-000Eja-43; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:21:18 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3 To: Jack Vogel Subject: Re: igb issues In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Jack Vogel message dated "Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:00:32 -0800." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:21:18 +0200 From: Daniel Braniss Message-ID: Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:21:21 -0000 Hi Jack, > --20cf30780b4661e6f904d0bedadd > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Try putting the driver from 9.1 back onto 8.3 and see if you still > see a problem. That will indicate if its in the driver or the stack/OS. > If you have any question about doing this send me email. > > Is NFS using UDP or TCP? > > Regards, short version: All is OK, sorry for the noise. long version: after sending off the message, I found a nic that I could plug into the box, did that, and before switching to use the em card, I tried another run with the igb, and surprice! all is ok, I will now have to go through logs to see what happend, but my guess is that the switch this host was connected was under heavy load, it has a cluster of HPCs. thanks, have a nice weekend and season greatings! danny > > Jack > > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote: > > > hi, > > I'm trying out a 4way Dell PowerEdge C5125/AMD server with onboard > > Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection version - 2.3.1 > > > > when running FreeBsd 8.3 (from sometime around Nov 2) all is ok. > > with latest (at least Fridays') 9.1-PRERELEASE it's getting 'constipated'. > > > > It seems that NFS writes slowdown to a halt, and so I'm getting 'not > > responding' errors. > > > > I am using the same kernel on different hosts with out any problems, > > even with Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection version - 2.3.4 > > > > Any ideas? > > > > danny > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > --20cf30780b4661e6f904d0bedadd > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Try putting the driver from 9.1 back onto 8.3 and see if you still
see = > a problem. That will indicate if its in the driver or the stack/OS.
iv>If you have any question about doing this send me email.

>
Is NFS using UDP or TCP?

Regards,
= >

Jack


On Th= > u, Dec 13, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Daniel Braniss < "mailto:danny@cs.huji.ac.il" target=3D"_blank">danny@cs.huji.ac.il><= > /span> wrote:
>
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">hi,
> I'm trying out a 4way Dell PowerEdge C5125/AMD server with onboard
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection version - 2.3.1
>
> when running FreeBsd 8.3 (from sometime around Nov 2) all is ok.
> with latest (at least Fridays') 9.1-PRERELEASE it's getting 'co= > nstipated'.
>
> It seems that NFS writes slowdown to a halt, and so I'm getting 'no= > t
> responding' errors.
>
> I am using the same kernel on different hosts with out any problems,
> even with Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection version - 2.3.4
>
> Any ideas?
>
> danny
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mail= > ing list
> "_blank">http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " cribe@freebsd.org">freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>

> > --20cf30780b4661e6f904d0bedadd-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 09:48:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B323A8; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:48:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDADA8FC16; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:48:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id LAA25524; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:48:12 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1TjRsK-000Od4-Hz; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:48:12 +0200 Message-ID: <50CAF5DA.6070203@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:48:10 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dokuchaev Subject: panic in AcpiExSystemMemorySpaceHandler [Was: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot] References: <20121213073033.GA19514@regency.nsu.ru> <50C9ABA0.20009@FreeBSD.org> <20121213102651.GA51050@regency.nsu.ru> <20121213103635.GG1325@glenbarber.us> <20121214030208.GA15080@regency.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <20121214030208.GA15080@regency.nsu.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:48:18 -0000 on 14/12/2012 05:02 Alexey Dokuchaev said the following: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:36:35AM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: >> >> https://snapshots.glenbarber.us/Latest/ >> >> It is a few days behind though. > > I've tried 10.0 image from it; still getting (apparently the same) panic [1]. OK. Let's move this over to acpi@. Could you please obtain acpidump output using Ubuntu? It might be available in "pmtools" package or "acpi-something" package, not sure... > It seems that something is wrong with AML, but I cannot tell much without > debug symbols. Glen, since you include kernel debugger in you snapshots, > do you think you can ship those .symbols as well? :-) > > ./danfe > > [1] http://193.124.210.26/10.0-acpi.dmesg > -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 09:50:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B77C4D4; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:50:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71BD98FC08; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:50:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id LAA25541; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:50:07 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1TjRuB-000OdE-1N; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:50:07 +0200 Message-ID: <50CAF64E.70600@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:50:06 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dokuchaev Subject: Re: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot References: <20121213073033.GA19514@regency.nsu.ru> <50C9ABA0.20009@FreeBSD.org> <20121213102651.GA51050@regency.nsu.ru> <20121213103635.GG1325@glenbarber.us> <20121214030208.GA15080@regency.nsu.ru> <20121214030747.GC1280@glenbarber.us> <20121214032349.GD1280@glenbarber.us> <20121214034056.GA22963@regency.nsu.ru> <20121214080450.GA63557@regency.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <20121214080450.GA63557@regency.nsu.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Glen Barber , stable@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:50:11 -0000 on 14/12/2012 10:04 Alexey Dokuchaev said the following: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:40:56AM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:23:49PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: >>> If the memstick panics, I am not sure how much good the kernel symbols >>> will do for you. >> >> It's OK, as long as they are provided, I should be able to modify the >> memstick contents (like, after rw-mounted it) and copy debug-enabled >> kernel in /boot. > > On the second thought (try, actually) they are not too much helpful > indeed, as I cannot get crashdump for post-mortem analysis (when symbols > become useful), since panic happens so early debugger apparently has no > idea of where to store the dump. It looks like you obtained the boot messages using some sort of a remote console? If yes, you can try to use kgdb for a live remote debugging. > It seems I have to debug it the hard way > (hello printf's). > > Is it possible to cross build amd64 10.0 kernels on i386 8.3 machine? amd64 on i386 - yes, 10 on 8.3 - not so sure... -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 10:35:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD00B3C; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:35:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [84.237.50.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49ECF8FC12; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TjSbR-0002ij-U4; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:34:49 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id qBEAZc7A090613; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:35:38 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id qBEAZXMd090586; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:35:33 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:35:33 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot Message-ID: <20121214103532.GA88134@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20121213073033.GA19514@regency.nsu.ru> <50C9ABA0.20009@FreeBSD.org> <20121213102651.GA51050@regency.nsu.ru> <20121213103635.GG1325@glenbarber.us> <20121214030208.GA15080@regency.nsu.ru> <20121214030747.GC1280@glenbarber.us> <20121214032349.GD1280@glenbarber.us> <20121214034056.GA22963@regency.nsu.ru> <20121214080450.GA63557@regency.nsu.ru> <50CAF64E.70600@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50CAF64E.70600@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Glen Barber , stable@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:35:20 -0000 On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:50:06AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > It looks like you obtained the boot messages using some sort of a remote > console? Yes; luckily this box has serial port (real, on-board one). > If yes, you can try to use kgdb for a live remote debugging. I thought of it, but last time I tried I could get rid of "GDB: no debug ports present" message in dmesg. :-( Maybe it was due to USB<->serial adapter, and with "real" serial port it would not be a problem. ./danfe From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 10:40:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B02DECA6; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:40:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB588FC12; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id MAA25960; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:40:24 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1TjSgq-000OgJ-8v; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:40:24 +0200 Message-ID: <50CB0217.70002@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:40:23 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dokuchaev Subject: kgdb + uart [Was: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot] References: <20121213073033.GA19514@regency.nsu.ru> <50C9ABA0.20009@FreeBSD.org> <20121213102651.GA51050@regency.nsu.ru> <20121213103635.GG1325@glenbarber.us> <20121214030208.GA15080@regency.nsu.ru> <20121214030747.GC1280@glenbarber.us> <20121214032349.GD1280@glenbarber.us> <20121214034056.GA22963@regency.nsu.ru> <20121214080450.GA63557@regency.nsu.ru> <50CAF64E.70600@FreeBSD.org> <20121214103532.GA88134@regency.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <20121214103532.GA88134@regency.nsu.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Glen Barber , stable@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:40:29 -0000 on 14/12/2012 12:35 Alexey Dokuchaev said the following: > I thought of it, but last time I tried I could get rid of "GDB: no debug > ports present" message in dmesg. :-( Maybe it was due to USB<->serial > adapter, and with "real" serial port it would not be a problem. uart(4): 0x00080 use this port for remote kernel debugging There's probably a reason why this is not in the default hints, but I don't know it. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 10:43:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A469EB8; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:43:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [84.237.50.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9848D8FC13; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:43:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TjSjm-0003Br-V8; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:43:27 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id qBEAiF2w092595; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:44:15 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id qBEAiA4N092538; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:44:10 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:44:10 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: panic in AcpiExSystemMemorySpaceHandler [Was: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot] Message-ID: <20121214104409.GB88134@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20121213073033.GA19514@regency.nsu.ru> <50C9ABA0.20009@FreeBSD.org> <20121213102651.GA51050@regency.nsu.ru> <20121213103635.GG1325@glenbarber.us> <20121214030208.GA15080@regency.nsu.ru> <50CAF5DA.6070203@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50CAF5DA.6070203@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:43:30 -0000 On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:48:10AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > Could you please obtain acpidump output using Ubuntu? Yup, I already did [1]. Here is the what's inside: all.bin dump of all tables dsdt.bin dump of DSDT (original) dsdt.dsl decompiled DSDT dsdt.aml recompiled DSDT (from dsdt.dsl) [1] http://193.124.210.26/lenovo.tgz ./danfe From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 11:01:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD312CE; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:01:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [84.237.50.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F298FC0A; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TjT0J-0003sq-HO; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:00:31 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id qBEB1KD0096698; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:01:20 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id qBEB0xpJ096693; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:00:59 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:00:59 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: kgdb + uart [Was: 9.1 memstick install panics on boot] Message-ID: <20121214110058.GC88134@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20121213102651.GA51050@regency.nsu.ru> <20121213103635.GG1325@glenbarber.us> <20121214030208.GA15080@regency.nsu.ru> <20121214030747.GC1280@glenbarber.us> <20121214032349.GD1280@glenbarber.us> <20121214034056.GA22963@regency.nsu.ru> <20121214080450.GA63557@regency.nsu.ru> <50CAF64E.70600@FreeBSD.org> <20121214103532.GA88134@regency.nsu.ru> <50CB0217.70002@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50CB0217.70002@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:01:14 -0000 On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:40:23PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > uart(4): > 0x00080 use this port for remote kernel debugging Thanks, that did the magic. The problem, however, is that kgdb from i386 does not like amd64 kernel image, and I do not have any other amd64 box in the vicinity. Not sure how feasible would it be to build amd64-target yet i386-host kgdb. ./danfe From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 11:22:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84395909 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:22:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99A48FC0C for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:22:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id NAA26331; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:22:14 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1TjTLK-000OjA-2a; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:22:14 +0200 Message-ID: <50CB0BE4.4050103@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:22:12 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dokuchaev Subject: Re: kgdb + uart References: <20121213102651.GA51050@regency.nsu.ru> <20121213103635.GG1325@glenbarber.us> <20121214030208.GA15080@regency.nsu.ru> <20121214030747.GC1280@glenbarber.us> <20121214032349.GD1280@glenbarber.us> <20121214034056.GA22963@regency.nsu.ru> <20121214080450.GA63557@regency.nsu.ru> <50CAF64E.70600@FreeBSD.org> <20121214103532.GA88134@regency.nsu.ru> <50CB0217.70002@FreeBSD.org> <20121214110058.GC88134@regency.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <20121214110058.GC88134@regency.nsu.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:22:18 -0000 on 14/12/2012 13:00 Alexey Dokuchaev said the following: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:40:23PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> uart(4): >> 0x00080 use this port for remote kernel debugging > > Thanks, that did the magic. The problem, however, is that kgdb from i386 > does not like amd64 kernel image, and I do not have any other amd64 box > in the vicinity. Not sure how feasible would it be to build amd64-target > yet i386-host kgdb. Yeah, kgdb and target kernel must closely match each other. I guess that the machine does not support amd64 mode? -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 12:23:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5164EB for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:23:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525B38FC12 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TjUIN-00084o-EA for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 04:23:15 -0800 Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 04:23:15 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1355487795430-5769298.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1355449854281-5769225.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1354912564145-5767462.post@n5.nabble.com> <50C25B8F.2010605@ose.nl> <1355068021135-5767808.post@n5.nabble.com> <1355068983136-5767809.post@n5.nabble.com> <20121211034618.H52305@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <1355165547540-5768186.post@n5.nabble.com> <1355337941248-5768880.post@n5.nabble.com> <1355448945008-5769224.post@n5.nabble.com> <1355449854281-5769225.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Help review the FAQ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:23:16 -0000 After _following_ recommendations (0600) in #xconsole-failure, there is xterm error as well as xconsole one still. So definitely something is amiss. On the side note, revisited "What security features are present in &os;" should mention ProPolice. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5769298.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 14:31:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A778700; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:31:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [84.237.50.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957AC8FC1A; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TjWIT-00028O-E9; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:31:29 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id qBEEWJfK025201; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:32:19 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id qBEEWDiC025146; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:32:13 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:32:13 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: kgdb + uart Message-ID: <20121214143213.GB20406@regency.nsu.ru> References: <20121214030208.GA15080@regency.nsu.ru> <20121214030747.GC1280@glenbarber.us> <20121214032349.GD1280@glenbarber.us> <20121214034056.GA22963@regency.nsu.ru> <20121214080450.GA63557@regency.nsu.ru> <50CAF64E.70600@FreeBSD.org> <20121214103532.GA88134@regency.nsu.ru> <50CB0217.70002@FreeBSD.org> <20121214110058.GC88134@regency.nsu.ru> <50CB0BE4.4050103@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50CB0BE4.4050103@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:31:33 -0000 On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 01:22:12PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > Yeah, kgdb and target kernel must closely match each other. > I guess that the machine does not support amd64 mode? Which machine? :-) My laptop can do i386 only, as it has old Dothan CPU. Lenovo box (victim) is E5500, which I want to use as amd64, but you've given me an idea: if this problem is not amd64-specific, I might be able to trigger it with 10.0/i386 and then remotely debug from my laptop. I will try it tomorrow, thanks! ./danfe From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 16:38:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0DD9A2 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:38:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zkolic@sbb.rs) Received: from smtp3.sbb.rs (smtp3.sbb.rs [89.216.2.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4897E8FC14 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from faust.localdomain (cable-178-148-107-118.dynamic.sbb.rs [178.148.107.118]) by smtp3.sbb.rs (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id qBEGRj4l014499; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:27:50 +0100 Received: by faust.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9FF27A41B79; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:27:15 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:27:15 +0100 From: Zoran Kolic To: jakub_lach@mailplus.pl Subject: kms problem Message-ID: <20121214162715.GA1422@faust.sbb.rs> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:38:22 -0000 After successfuly installed 9.1 on desktop, I was after the same on lenovo e320 laptop. The first surprise was gpt. It failed to boot from ssd. Finally, I put parti- tions as old mbr and it was fine. Added KMS and NEW XORG and DRIVER into newly created /etc/make.conf (not existed before). Then I rebuilded the kernel, removing some staff, including all usb, and x11/xorg-minimal using portmaster. Without xorg.conf I made startx and... I had server rea- ding xinitrc, since it xsetroot the color of the back- ground and it read fvwm2rc configuration file. Nothing else. The cursor hangs in the middle of the screen. Nothing moves. I plan to make xorg.conf file first. Then to remove xmodmaprc from user directory at all. To check what it says for mouse and keyboard drivers. To add AutoAddDevices and DontZap to xorg.conf. Any idea how to puzzle off this situation? I let psm driver for mouse stay in the kernel, just as agp, since people mentioned it necessary for some stuff in kms. I will add more information if needed. Best regards Zoran From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 18:13:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCB579E for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:13:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcartwri@asu.edu) Received: from mail-ia0-f182.google.com (mail-ia0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A96C8FC12 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f182.google.com with SMTP id x2so3416397iad.13 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:13:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=TCccf/NuOiAtiT6yKTFP08HMMf0LuP3gZ4LuGYrMoac=; b=F67/FpvRh5CpxjudzaFVKqc2yMJ72IoSRB3uh8zwo5tDjJJ/9XUZcLAkgsIfcJQ1I4 cOKalH3tupLr1O+VitRen+CTzKOU0B18YWHlZWM/dEPZnUu4QlA/YT+PylSRwXSTtaNk QfjjV3Zj/yu5IMFl1DMunlrihOvM70cJlRSi8MqWUpCBwCxO+zLpC65ouH6QiI3/1iRj PJV3drDT5J1RjenCeHey8AvbiVEYHPZ5HYPDIQ+CETcrN9Ck4YqCKChk9fAWgPVapCR4 Qi+D9l9pKiDwtaqx9oF7TZs1VkjNAmpF8QLleVy6tbTQsSyMCUoca2Qfua2ZFFpD9mcz b7Iw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.62.133 with SMTP id xa5mr5353944icb.28.1355508809897; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:13:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.64.39 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:13:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <50C9AFC6.6080902@FreeBSD.org> <50CA1639.1010409@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:13:29 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NFS/ZFS hangs after upgrading from 9.0-RELEASE to -STABLE From: "Reed A. Cartwright" To: olivier Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmj6+5btGLMWIoMRJf900/c23kJB/gaZRjNjASwa++F1/tQsrcrOFDFD+LIw6b0xs6dga/w Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" , ken@freebsd.org, Kashyap.Desai@lsi.com, Andriy Gapon X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:13:33 -0000 I need to do this as well. Can you give me a quick primer on the commands you used to revert to the earlier driver? On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:14 PM, olivier wrote: > For what it's worth, I think I might have solved my problem by reverting to > an older version of the mps driver. I checked out a recent version of > 9-STABLE and reversed the changes in > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=230592 (perhaps there > was a simpler way of reverting to the older mps driver). So far so good, no > hang even when hammering the file system. > > This does not conclusively prove that the new LSI mps driver is at fault, > but that seems to be a likely explanation. > > Thanks to everybody who pointed me in the right direction. Hope this helps > others who run into similar problems with 9.1 > Olivier > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:14 AM, olivier wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >>> Google for "zfs deadman". This is already committed upstream and I think >>> that it >>> is imported into FreeBSD, but I am not sure... Maybe it's imported just >>> into the >>> vendor area and is not merged yet. >>> >> >> Yes, that's exactly what I had in mind. The logic for panicking makes >> sense. >> As far as I can tell you're correct that deadman is in the vendor area but >> not merged. Any idea when it might make it into 9-STABLE? >> Thanks >> Olivier >> >> >> >> >>> So, when enabled this logic would panic a system as a way of letting know >>> that >>> something is wrong. You can read in the links why panic was selected for >>> this job. >>> >>> And speaking FreeBSD-centric - I think that our CAM layer would be a >>> perfect place >>> to detect such issues in non-ZFS-specific way. >>> >>> -- >>> Andriy Gapon >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Reed A. Cartwright, PhD Assistant Professor of Genomics, Evolution, and Bioinformatics School of Life Sciences Center for Evolutionary Medicine and Informatics The Biodesign Institute Arizona State University From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 18:33:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AA2C0; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:33:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ken@kdm.org) Received: from nargothrond.kdm.org (nargothrond.kdm.org [70.56.43.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788E28FC08; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nargothrond.kdm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nargothrond.kdm.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id qBEILlY9066662; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:21:47 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ken@nargothrond.kdm.org) Received: (from ken@localhost) by nargothrond.kdm.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id qBEILltT066661; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:21:47 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ken) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:21:47 -0700 From: "Kenneth D. Merry" To: olivier Subject: Re: NFS/ZFS hangs after upgrading from 9.0-RELEASE to -STABLE Message-ID: <20121214182147.GA66456@nargothrond.kdm.org> References: <50C9AFC6.6080902@FreeBSD.org> <50CA1639.1010409@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kashyap.Desai@lsi.com, Andriy Gapon X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:33:10 -0000 This doesn't quite make sense. In your original email, you said that you're using a mpt-based Fibre Channel card and have a ZFS filesystem on top of that. If that's the case, why would going back to an older version of the mps(4) driver change things at all? It has no support for that hardware. Ken On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 22:14:15 -0800, olivier wrote: > For what it's worth, I think I might have solved my problem by reverting to > an older version of the mps driver. I checked out a recent version of > 9-STABLE and reversed the changes in > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=230592 (perhaps there > was a simpler way of reverting to the older mps driver). So far so good, no > hang even when hammering the file system. > > This does not conclusively prove that the new LSI mps driver is at fault, > but that seems to be a likely explanation. > > Thanks to everybody who pointed me in the right direction. Hope this helps > others who run into similar problems with 9.1 > Olivier > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:14 AM, olivier wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > >> Google for "zfs deadman". This is already committed upstream and I think > >> that it > >> is imported into FreeBSD, but I am not sure... Maybe it's imported just > >> into the > >> vendor area and is not merged yet. > >> > > > > Yes, that's exactly what I had in mind. The logic for panicking makes > > sense. > > As far as I can tell you're correct that deadman is in the vendor area but > > not merged. Any idea when it might make it into 9-STABLE? > > Thanks > > Olivier > > > > > > > > > >> So, when enabled this logic would panic a system as a way of letting know > >> that > >> something is wrong. You can read in the links why panic was selected for > >> this job. > >> > >> And speaking FreeBSD-centric - I think that our CAM layer would be a > >> perfect place > >> to detect such issues in non-ZFS-specific way. > >> > >> -- > >> Andriy Gapon > >> > > > > -- Kenneth Merry ken@FreeBSD.ORG From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 19:19:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168A6824; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:19:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivier777a7@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44D08FC0A; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:19:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id wz12so2371163pbc.13 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:19:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ET5VX6TXjBFws3SOtAy/UObtCXX6Br02btDImzD5ILA=; b=i1A+4vV4tIYiEkFYaNHdNn5+I0bxTcmx3GuL843+crSrC8AOmXDkVC8OYvlicgeA/y B/JjyNk/OUD/2Cv6lHcB4av3yEdXEkUsnBWip+MAuh2ynaRwon/qZFZ3TffeSROTRgXd B6bdh82XiRwE5t2OxRDBmErZj4DDxIwUKKZBcPaJZdztBVWZ8Q1JObuPOtooIi77ORxk EALMk6dFfGgG+IKcnLPxybh1ND/sy5euyeNyWCffGvkeuBcd14VHs0J7MxlpLKl9K8l4 aZ4YThXerIdNPZs8EpjbeaLIJ9x1s3hd4bw7ue8j+JzUWR+7rbLtf3/PKnollf03RRHF oIxw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.75.162 with SMTP id d2mr18415078paw.27.1355512780539; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:19:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.148.136 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:19:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121214182147.GA66456@nargothrond.kdm.org> References: <50C9AFC6.6080902@FreeBSD.org> <50CA1639.1010409@FreeBSD.org> <20121214182147.GA66456@nargothrond.kdm.org> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:19:40 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NFS/ZFS hangs after upgrading from 9.0-RELEASE to -STABLE From: olivier To: "Kenneth D. Merry" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kashyap.Desai@lsi.com, Andriy Gapon X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:19:47 -0000 Sorry about the confusion. I'd forgotten to mention that a few of the disks in the pool in which that ZFS filesystem resides are actually provided through the mps driver. In other words, my pool has a couple disks it sees through the mps driver, and other disks it sees through the mpt driver. (For the sake of completeness, the same machine also has ZFS on root, with a pool formed from a single mps disk; I haven't formally excluded that the hangs are due to my root pool but that probably doesn't change the problem). Reed: I'm happy to provide my compiled kernel for you to try out (if you're using generic). To compile yourself, checkout 9-STABLE, replace /usr/src/sys/dev/mps by the version from 9.0, and edit sys/conf/files and sys/modules/mps/Makefile to revert the diffs shown in http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=230592 I'm sure there's a more elegant way of doing this (would it be safe to just copy over mps.ko from 9.0?). Olivier On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > This doesn't quite make sense. In your original email, you said that > you're using a mpt-based Fibre Channel card and have a ZFS filesystem on > top of that. > > If that's the case, why would going back to an older version of the mps(4) > driver change things at all? It has no support for that hardware. > > Ken > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 22:14:15 -0800, olivier wrote: > > For what it's worth, I think I might have solved my problem by reverting > to > > an older version of the mps driver. I checked out a recent version of > > 9-STABLE and reversed the changes in > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=230592 (perhaps > there > > was a simpler way of reverting to the older mps driver). So far so good, > no > > hang even when hammering the file system. > > > > This does not conclusively prove that the new LSI mps driver is at fault, > > but that seems to be a likely explanation. > > > > Thanks to everybody who pointed me in the right direction. Hope this > helps > > others who run into similar problems with 9.1 > > Olivier > > > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:14 AM, olivier > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > > > >> Google for "zfs deadman". This is already committed upstream and I > think > > >> that it > > >> is imported into FreeBSD, but I am not sure... Maybe it's imported > just > > >> into the > > >> vendor area and is not merged yet. > > >> > > > > > > Yes, that's exactly what I had in mind. The logic for panicking makes > > > sense. > > > As far as I can tell you're correct that deadman is in the vendor area > but > > > not merged. Any idea when it might make it into 9-STABLE? > > > Thanks > > > Olivier > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> So, when enabled this logic would panic a system as a way of letting > know > > >> that > > >> something is wrong. You can read in the links why panic was selected > for > > >> this job. > > >> > > >> And speaking FreeBSD-centric - I think that our CAM layer would be a > > >> perfect place > > >> to detect such issues in non-ZFS-specific way. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Andriy Gapon > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > Kenneth Merry > ken@FreeBSD.ORG > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 20:31:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A111990 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 20:31:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D1F8FC0C for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 20:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id go10so3158299lbb.13 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:31:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=G8on9itF8x3kVfKhzp1Ank353BbXOCEEHIAoQiMeVMU=; b=I11zapWwqs3ZsN6kwvnyj6Nz7tMAyaTInJ2g/pm9yl6p7W7OVjFeg79vZW6GhyQ8d7 sJtmQunx5uygR8cG9h4OlsuqdAOL0Zi0qW8l1QMbXb4DcfUkyfzYsXMl8FUEEl/lDOyp 0y/yzKM37x1acpdDRTCqfYz29dpDn9ck8OrMyDI+PqhWGoUUDhg/CUnOENraRrNnGvVv FoBqRLu7mFfA0ykevBncKwiU3bYsbm4qqLPvS3X0xG4B5n4i+8/yXhUfolOTyOZYte3U IgD+niXRO7cENPP9ieAdSX2n9/wUQ25bTaDP4GR4XznSYtxpQtZEvQH1MBPjsuLfyxM7 vaHg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.125.7 with SMTP id mm7mr3747225lab.2.1355517085411; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:31:25 -0800 (PST) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.11.165 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:31:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:31:25 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: OMFWkr7nh_CImjomrhBHtFIzPcY Message-ID: Subject: 9.1-RC3 problems with Creative Audigy 2 ZS [SB0350] audio From: CeDeROM To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 20:31:33 -0000 Hello :-) Recently I have switched to Creative Audigy 2 ZS [SB0350] PCI audio card from SoundBlaster Live! The new audio device although using the same kernel driver have some problems with audio/video streams - sound does not resemble original at all and the video player hangs (until audio buffer is flushed I guess). Did anyone enountered similar problem? I guess there is something wrong with audio format/samplerate conversion...? Best regards, Tomek More information: emu10kx0: port 0xdc00-0xdc3f irq 21 at device 6.0 on pci4 % sysctl -a | grep pcm dev.pcm.0.%desc: EMU10Kx DSP front PCM interface dev.pcm.0.%driver: pcm dev.pcm.0.%parent: emu10kx0 dev.pcm.0.eapd: 1 dev.pcm.0.play.vchans: 1 dev.pcm.0.play.vchanmode: fixed dev.pcm.0.play.vchanrate: 48000 dev.pcm.0.play.vchanformat: s16le:2.0 dev.pcm.0.rec.vchans: 1 dev.pcm.0.rec.vchanmode: fixed dev.pcm.0.rec.vchanrate: 48000 dev.pcm.0.rec.vchanformat: s16le:2.0 dev.pcm.0.buffersize: 65536 dev.pcm.0.bitperfect: 0 dev.pcm.1.%desc: EMU10Kx DSP rear PCM interface dev.pcm.1.%driver: pcm dev.pcm.1.%parent: emu10kx0 dev.pcm.1.play.vchans: 1 dev.pcm.1.play.vchanmode: fixed dev.pcm.1.play.vchanrate: 48000 dev.pcm.1.play.vchanformat: s16le:2.0 dev.pcm.1.buffersize: 65536 dev.pcm.1.bitperfect: 0 dev.pcm.2.%desc: EMU10Kx DSP center PCM interface dev.pcm.2.%driver: pcm dev.pcm.2.%parent: emu10kx0 dev.pcm.2.play.vchans: 1 dev.pcm.2.play.vchanmode: fixed dev.pcm.2.play.vchanrate: 48000 dev.pcm.2.play.vchanformat: s16le:2.0 dev.pcm.2.buffersize: 65536 dev.pcm.2.bitperfect: 0 dev.pcm.3.%desc: EMU10Kx DSP subwoofer PCM interface dev.pcm.3.%driver: pcm dev.pcm.3.%parent: emu10kx0 dev.pcm.3.play.vchans: 1 dev.pcm.3.play.vchanmode: fixed dev.pcm.3.play.vchanrate: 48000 dev.pcm.3.play.vchanformat: s16le:2.0 dev.pcm.3.buffersize: 65536 dev.pcm.3.bitperfect: 0 dev.pcm.4.%desc: EMU10Kx DSP side PCM interface dev.pcm.4.%driver: pcm dev.pcm.4.%parent: emu10kx0 dev.pcm.4.play.vchans: 1 dev.pcm.4.play.vchanmode: fixed dev.pcm.4.play.vchanrate: 48000 dev.pcm.4.play.vchanformat: s16le:2.0 dev.pcm.4.buffersize: 65536 dev.pcm.4.bitperfect: 0 -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 15 12:56:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15146928 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 12:56:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA4D8FC1C for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 12:56:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TjrHX-0001hW-Uy for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 04:55:55 -0800 Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 04:55:55 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1355576155952-5769493.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1355487795430-5769298.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <50C25B8F.2010605@ose.nl> <1355068021135-5767808.post@n5.nabble.com> <1355068983136-5767809.post@n5.nabble.com> <20121211034618.H52305@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <1355165547540-5768186.post@n5.nabble.com> <1355337941248-5768880.post@n5.nabble.com> <1355448945008-5769224.post@n5.nabble.com> <1355449854281-5769225.post@n5.nabble.com> <1355487795430-5769298.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Help review the FAQ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 12:56:03 -0000 #missing-hw-float There is no longer npx option in 9 GENERIC i386 kernel, so there is nothing to delete accidentally. Traces of npx on my system (amd64) are: $ locate npx /usr/src/share/man/man4/man4.i386/npx.4 /usr/src/sys/i386/include/npx.h /usr/src/sys/i386/isa/npx.c /usr/src/sys/pc98/include/npx.h + NOTES content. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5769493.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 15 19:44:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49FAC0 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 19:44:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wicked@baot.se) Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2308FC14 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 19:44:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hm9so1175456wib.13 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:44:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent:x-gm-message-state; bh=mWQf8bo+6SNpvK7KZxoLxcl+gQmQ0SL0Ho1I6nV7SF4=; b=PRPz+hKQo47BLKrbmvD/icdR1WgNwZHjpobeL4/A7zzdiYrz9SKyoh8ZSOlKJnH+1g w0o7ID78RU8Uw5VxBCCIUZkesNcZguCClQZaQCrFLkxeLy2Nz2qveJ7wy549JH8O1jn4 6rdFUodIf4vcdayE4pCqll9nENd4TgDWQo+vdrPax3awhZMo4YKvEWjWM5SFdylUPOQB YquKEpqkAh7KlCqaGIRPUMSy6NM1ofaRFgTMOeCFj0kgkrtlk8nTfA1ISfblUyK1tT/H wYbCA+/QasC+0ENboFgCZO224cMK7OC1T2LCD0aGgKwUKKivSqYW6xUyzfE/0mlY1KHM C8Sw== Received: by 10.194.58.230 with SMTP id u6mr9311430wjq.5.1355600676963; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:44:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from baot.se (baot.se. [82.192.84.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cf6sm3989909wib.3.2012.12.15.11.44.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:44:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by baot.se (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 15 Dec 2012 19:44:27 +0000 Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 19:44:27 +0000 From: "Anders N." To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: svn revision in uname Message-ID: <20121215194427.GA19347@baot.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkmkRrZ9bcE0hUMo0upILdPLxDq6ZixVaIPoyNuSZpplg+TEqXSLIOVc/bYViPh2EaR/tqY X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 19:44:44 -0000 Hi. I've noticed in my "uname -a" on 9.1-RELEASE there is "r243826." This is on a system that upgraded from 9.1-RC3 using freebsd-update (binary). On another system, upgraded from 9.0-RELEASE via freebsd-update (source), there is nothing at all and uname -a looks normal. Two other people I asked have r243825 (installed from ISO) and r243872 (upgraded from svn). They're all 9.1-RELEASE, shouldn't they be the same, final version? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 15 20:15:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15ED98B4 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:15:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C228FC12 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tjy9C-0007wL-Gs for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 12:15:46 -0800 Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 12:15:46 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1355602546517-5769591.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <20121215194427.GA19347@baot.se> References: <20121215194427.GA19347@baot.se> Subject: Re: svn revision in uname MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:15:48 -0000 This is revision of svn repository as whole when checkout was made. Not release branch. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/svn-revision-in-uname-tp5769581p5769591.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 15 21:54:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B55679; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:54:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onyx.glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:c200::face]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2F98FC0C; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:54:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (kaos.glenbarber.us [71.224.221.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by onyx.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A1DF23F763; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:54:15 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.1 onyx.glenbarber.us 5A1DF23F763 Authentication-Results: onyx.glenbarber.us; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:54:12 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: stable@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: FWD: FreeBSD Development Snapshot Availability Message-ID: <20121215215412.GE1344@glenbarber.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fWddYNRDgTk9wQGZ" Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:54:17 -0000 --fWddYNRDgTk9wQGZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable For those on -stable@ and -current@ not subscribed to -announce@: Glen ----- Forwarded message from Glen Barber ----- Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:37:11 -0500 =46rom: Glen Barber To: freebsd-announce@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Development Snapshot Availability I am pleased to announce the re-availability of FreeBSD development snapshots provided by the FreeBSD Project. As with any development branch, these snapshots are not intended for use on production systems. However, we do encourage testing on non-production systems as much as possible. At this time, installation images are available for: - 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 - 10.0-CURRENT/i386 - 10.0-CURRENT/powerpc - 10.0-CURRENT/powerpc64 - 9.1-PRERELEASE/amd64 - 9.1-PRERELEASE/i386 Snapshots for the stable/8 branch are currently not available. Please note, the 9.1-PRERELEASE images are the stable/9 branch, not what will be 9.1-RELEASE. Also note, the 10.0-CURRENT powerpc and powerpc64 builds do not currently include a memstick image. Users interested in testing the development branches are also encouraged to subscribe to the freebsd-snapshots@ mailing list, where new snapshot availability, including corresponding installation image checksums, and any additional noteworthy information about the images will be announced. The list subscription URL is: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-snapshots Snapshots may be downloaded from the corresponding architecture subdirectory over FTP: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/ Please be patient if your local FTP mirror has not yet caught up with the changes. Problems, bug reports, or regression reports should be reported through the GNATS PR system or the appropriate mailing list, such as -current@ or -stable@ . Checksums for the current set of snapshots: o 10.0-CURRENT amd64: MD5 (FreeBSD-10.0-CURRENT-amd64-20121209-bootonly.iso) =3D c98f99312f9da7dc= f94e571da759583d MD5 (FreeBSD-10.0-CURRENT-amd64-20121209-memstick) =3D eb7bcf8dcfae35d772b9= b20ce64c7399 MD5 (FreeBSD-10.0-CURRENT-amd64-20121209-release.iso) =3D 239bdf4de6774a47c= cc11ca1d378e1ef SHA256 (FreeBSD-10.0-CURRENT-amd64-20121209-bootonly.iso) =3D 20998c1272115= dde8ef032ea58471e7aafd6c41284d81a65b9e407d3884c5d1f SHA256 (FreeBSD-10.0-CURRENT-amd64-20121209-memstick) =3D 2429ba78a4647324b= 2a0009037e0400df06e2e10a2a9547b5c7a8ac3b28629b9 SHA256 (FreeBSD-10.0-CURRENT-amd64-20121209-release.iso) =3D 9d0dc08bdae87e= 9dd883afa5e0448b85491345124c0a8a0741559d6599b720bf o 10.0-CURRENT i386: MD5 (FreeBSD-10.0-CURRENT-i386-20121209-bootonly.iso) =3D 6ef0f61e42e0554f8= 128bfe468840451 MD5 (FreeBSD-10.0-CURRENT-i386-20121209-memstick) =3D 1af85be9389e43b373c67= c7aa3e5c550 MD5 (FreeBSD-10.0-CURRENT-i386-20121209-release.iso) =3D cae4bc258aaf94c056= a9e818ca7393fa SHA256 (FreeBSD-10.0-CURRENT-i386-20121209-bootonly.iso) =3D d576dcae22df22= 6a59dbe2d4e25efee335c85f62b9551936e2f1c1a973dbb3fb SHA256 (FreeBSD-10.0-CURRENT-i386-20121209-memstick) =3D c828b881f2587cebd7= 746033e774767894555968bbf0052237a55ee1697b71c2 SHA256 (FreeBSD-10.0-CURRENT-i386-20121209-release.iso) =3D e8745fb4ed6efa9= aa4eb4e4873e4dcf39d97d381c983326758eb001954ac8405 o 10.0-CURRENT powerpc: MD5 (FreeBSD-10.0-CURRENT-powerpc-20121211-bootonly.iso) =3D 6767d524c12c79= 63dc788b451a7a8384 MD5 (FreeBSD-10.0-CURRENT-powerpc-20121211-release.iso) =3D 7374f919c36dbd5= 2966db35b86a58f78 SHA256 (FreeBSD-10.0-CURRENT-powerpc-20121211-bootonly.iso) =3D 509f7e0d9e7= 95ca7fda95e6c68fc94afa914b24eaaddf463a82183475e9d2dc1 SHA256 (FreeBSD-10.0-CURRENT-powerpc-20121211-release.iso) =3D 2a8955dbb193= 7cffd205bb518be43dea5c33353bfb44606fabed6f719b9680b0 o 10.0-CURRENT powerpc64: MD5 (FreeBSD-10.0-CURRENT-powerpc64-20121210-bootonly.iso) =3D 066fb4da4339= b67cb7d33bc7c0947f54 MD5 (FreeBSD-10.0-CURRENT-powerpc64-20121210-release.iso) =3D db30b252b78fd= 85eefdbfddd37c91797 SHA256 (FreeBSD-10.0-CURRENT-powerpc64-20121210-bootonly.iso) =3D 2e3b725f9= 101afa87932bb3688dcc1ec9ceb40d419d7c7bd5ab808bb85f43513 SHA256 (FreeBSD-10.0-CURRENT-powerpc64-20121210-release.iso) =3D 36cd422196= 18524239906bedeb6b9571b1dae41471f9cb025d1dfec8618bf1c4 o 9.1-PRERELEASE amd64: MD5 (FreeBSD-9.1-PRERELEASE-amd64-20121209-bootonly.iso) =3D 10e970db2eb681= 07eed0d010798f30cc MD5 (FreeBSD-9.1-PRERELEASE-amd64-20121209-memstick) =3D 07b0422e45a8836daf= f9e052bd973e1a MD5 (FreeBSD-9.1-PRERELEASE-amd64-20121209-release.iso) =3D 1e7f7836d1ad519= c5fd01775c7bb7576 SHA256 (FreeBSD-9.1-PRERELEASE-amd64-20121209-bootonly.iso) =3D 5359dc27d38= 8da44163e5d0b9ecef1dda2eb4a4e83469849c86ad967ff74e26a SHA256 (FreeBSD-9.1-PRERELEASE-amd64-20121209-memstick) =3D c6a8c4e5ffffc1a= 56a4f6efcdbef2736d265d2270693b763ed4171ffea9f94a5 SHA256 (FreeBSD-9.1-PRERELEASE-amd64-20121209-release.iso) =3D ca180c895890= 2c32e01629b01b2db4c826aa5817ab1abf03512103f948e87492 o 9.1-PRERELEASE i386: MD5 (FreeBSD-9.1-PRERELEASE-i386-20121209-bootonly.iso) =3D 05511515a607399= 037de2227284aa119 MD5 (FreeBSD-9.1-PRERELEASE-i386-20121209-memstick) =3D 9b12248a2eb06e5c7f3= 4d48684d3979d MD5 (FreeBSD-9.1-PRERELEASE-i386-20121209-release.iso) =3D f4c880b3d6d124d1= 943e37bc4b5d51a3 SHA256 (FreeBSD-9.1-PRERELEASE-i386-20121209-bootonly.iso) =3D 1d5e6f52b356= 7c78c384df34d80ab90fd594d26f8064955118477964a1278939 SHA256 (FreeBSD-9.1-PRERELEASE-i386-20121209-memstick) =3D 33d86994013df479= 70e8b780a94649505fc41ca43f922bf3014a6b425dbc80f0 SHA256 (FreeBSD-9.1-PRERELEASE-i386-20121209-release.iso) =3D 1e8998f069ce8= 85c0d6a8d267d5fe14da9b33ed2dc90a52b501197d67f28090b Regards, Glen --=20 One OS to rule them all, On FTP, we'll host them. One machine to build them all, And any bugs, we'll find them. ----- End forwarded message ----- --fWddYNRDgTk9wQGZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQzPGEAAoJEFJPDDeguUajUmMH/2aWVcsoWIC905k4n54Xbrmw gnALqiCcHaoFRFFkwe4OwG6+spQHyDuQp6ukvpwfkWcd+GsAsibvk4jWIqupmzUD fQDZ9PFQNq1fzE8CoZqhmQgD6LCV7vAg8XHzGKFDVNB/HoauISWx5X2iJnTnQpu6 q7RwWbL4QssnsoYrxs2iT3z0CdgbxIgk53pShLbMrYi+RBmEJ5FHMPHQOgy0qZLN x1DyzgrVQQQlvjP0SwXSBAkwfakHXj0XlgRaSBXx9zosFE5nT6XREl8vgEufZXtf nPQJSA4YFSkBrd///h+3jdBT++8bAvCIBvL+cYYKF8fKBQhQQG7AC8TqTTxufGk= =iUFz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fWddYNRDgTk9wQGZ--