From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar  4 19:03:33 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: standards@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC06106564A
	for <standards@freebsd.org>; Sun,  4 Mar 2012 19:03:33 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org)
Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A217C8FC0A
	for <standards@freebsd.org>; Sun,  4 Mar 2012 19:03:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [96.47.65.170])
	by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B4B546B43;
	Sun,  4 Mar 2012 14:03:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from kavik.baldwin.cx (c-68-36-150-83.hsd1.nj.comcast.net
	[68.36.150.83])
	by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3BFBB95A;
	Sun,  4 Mar 2012 14:03:32 -0500 (EST)
From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To: standards@freebsd.org
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:03:28 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-BETA2; KDE/4.6.5; i386; ; )
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201203041403.29020.jhb@freebsd.org>
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(bigwig.baldwin.cx); Sun, 04 Mar 2012 14:03:33 -0500 (EST)
Cc: 
Subject: PR kern/164674
X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Standards compliance <freebsd-standards.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-standards>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-standards@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 19:03:33 -0000

My standard-parsing fu is weak.  Can some other folks on this list look at 
this PR, figure out what the correct semantics for *fprintf() in this case, 
and evaluate the patch?  Thanks.

-- 
John Baldwin