From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 10:50:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C712610657E4 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 10:50:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivoras@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84EEC8FC14 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 10:50:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so4704314yhg.13 for ; Mon, 07 May 2012 03:50:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=X4SH6bhi2lQx0yMQHPWzBWpgf4hvPcXo0CUcehlN5vc=; b=NGkUMfryBD2tn6iWMXWx2yZdMV2obbNurPzhYpy2T516yWts/2kSkZyvkOEv1jo+Nn t++y4C+EktjJ/LpBJ5yrW/7tD+Rrk8Lqb6Tc0zmwOsySlzX4UBf3LQPo68mGQMPE4IQm 4ql/Monqghu4qmI7uDg4JAB37DWiETGFunZDb+NeI2fzc2Msyv+srAR3/n15fhXNDjra FkBhvJEpgQ9pQPEehCy495tI8TTj9wdaFvQ9f/DXij+tTVwPELdzxk5V2Bny65B/Ujnr aS4uHy9zTGuWJ3OyPRKX8g24IS3fT1jt2dnqR3iXyCifEzrNCnvK0AKFewPnXRM8tqGf mNMQ== Received: by 10.236.76.35 with SMTP id a23mr18345731yhe.125.1336387844919; Mon, 07 May 2012 03:50:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: ivoras@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.121.10 with HTTP; Mon, 7 May 2012 03:50:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 12:50:04 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2mThDzDSHcxyG_eo76ROmdSJAtE Message-ID: To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: XENHVM on 9-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 10:50:45 -0000 Hi, Is XENHVM usable on 9-STABLE amd64? I seem to recall some problems early in 9-current. From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 11:06:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768F81065675; Mon, 7 May 2012 11:06:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from krichy@tvnetwork.hu) Received: from krichy.tvnetwork.hu (krichy.tvnetwork.hu [109.61.101.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290728FC1E; Mon, 7 May 2012 11:06:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by krichy.tvnetwork.hu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E5EFA20437; Mon, 7 May 2012 13:06:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krichy.tvnetwork.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E15212010C; Mon, 7 May 2012 13:06:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 13:06:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Richard Kojedzinszky To: Ivan Voras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XENHVM on 9-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 11:06:27 -0000 Dear Ivan, I am using 9.0-release right now, with no noticed problems. regards, Kojedzinszky Richard Euronet Magyarorszag Informatikai Zrt. On Mon, 7 May 2012, Ivan Voras wrote: > Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 12:50:04 +0200 > From: Ivan Voras > To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org > Subject: XENHVM on 9-stable > > Hi, > > Is XENHVM usable on 9-STABLE amd64? I seem to recall some problems > early in 9-current. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 11:07:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4ED61065672 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 11:07:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15148FC26 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 11:07:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q47B7SZq072585 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 11:07:28 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q47B7Sxj072583 for freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 7 May 2012 11:07:28 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 11:07:28 GMT Message-Id: <201205071107.q47B7Sxj072583@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 11:07:29 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/166174 xen [xen] Problems ROOT MOUNT ERROR o kern/165418 xen [xen] Problems mounting root filesystem from XENHVM o kern/164630 xen [xen] XEN HVM kernel: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: stil o kern/164450 xen [xen] Failed to install FreeeBSD 9.0-RELEASE from CD i o kern/162677 xen [xen] FreeBSD not compatible with "Current Stable Xen" o kern/161318 xen [xen] sysinstall crashes with floating point exception o kern/155468 xen [xen] Xen PV i386 multi-kernel CPU system is not worki o kern/155353 xen [xen] [patch] put "nudging TOD" message under boot_ver o kern/154833 xen [xen]: xen 4.0 - DomU freebsd8.2RC3 i386, XEN kernel. o kern/154473 xen [xen] xen 4.0 - DomU freebsd8.1 i386, XEN kernel. Not o kern/154472 xen [xen] xen 4.0 - DomU freebsd8.1 i386 xen kernel reboot o kern/154428 xen [xen] xn0 network interface and PF - Massive performan o kern/153674 xen [xen] i386/XEN idle thread shows wrong percentages o kern/153672 xen [xen] [panic] i386/XEN panics under heavy fork load o kern/153620 xen [xen] Xen guest system clock drifts in AWS EC2 (FreeBS o kern/153477 xen [xen] XEN pmap code abuses vm page queue lock o kern/153150 xen [xen] xen/ec2: disable checksum offloading on interfac o kern/152228 xen [xen] [panic] Xen/PV panic with machdep.idle_mwait=1 o kern/144629 xen [xen] FreeBSD 8-RELEASE XEN pvm networking doesn't wor o kern/143398 xen [xen] FreeBSD 8-RELEASE XEN pvm networking doesn't wor o kern/143340 xen [xen] FreeBSD 8-RELEASE XEN pvm networking doesn't wor f kern/143069 xen [xen] [panic] Xen Kernel Panic - Memory modified after f kern/135667 xen ufs filesystem corruption on XEN DomU system f kern/135421 xen [xen] FreeBSD Xen PVM DomU network failure - netfronc. f kern/135178 xen [xen] Xen domU outgoing data transfer stall when TSO i p kern/135069 xen [xen] FreeBSD-current/Xen SMP doesn't function at all f i386/124516 xen [xen] FreeBSD-CURRENT Xen Kernel Segfaults when config o kern/118734 xen [xen] FreeBSD 6.3-RC1 and FreeBSD 7.0-BETA 4 fail to b 28 problems total. From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 7 22:25:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E171065670 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 22:25:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hugo@barafranca.com) Received: from mail.barafranca.com (mail.barafranca.com [67.213.67.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14468FC12 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 22:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [172.16.100.24]) by mail.barafranca.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA84854 for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 22:25:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at barafranca.com Received: from mail.barafranca.com ([172.16.100.24]) by localhost (mail.barafranca.com [172.16.100.24]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4CalqS7YBC8f for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 22:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.1] (a89-152-174-115.cpe.netcabo.pt [89.152.174.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.barafranca.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D4CE84F for ; Mon, 7 May 2012 22:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FA84BA1.5000809@barafranca.com> Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 23:24:33 +0100 From: Hugo Silva User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: XENHVM on 9-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 22:25:27 -0000 On 05/07/12 11:50, Ivan Voras wrote: > Hi, > > Is XENHVM usable on 9-STABLE amd64? I seem to recall some problems > early in 9-current. I still see timekeeping problems with -RELEASE, altough switching to HTC *appears to* mitigate the problem somewhat. Other than that, the OS runs stable, but simple stuff like portsnap fetch update appear to use a lot more CPU than normal. Hugo From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 12 16:41:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B2D106564A for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 16:41:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from denis@webmaster.spb.ru) Received: from mail-relay-02.infobox.org (mail-relay-02.infobox.org [77.221.130.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B8F8FC14 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 16:41:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from in-relay-05.infobox.org (77.221.130.246.addr.datapoint.ru [77.221.130.246]) by mail-relay-02.infobox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4114D9072AD9 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 20:32:06 +0400 (MSK) Received: from [192.168.2.32] (unknown [217.197.230.90]) (Authenticated sender: denis@webmaster.spb.ru) by in-relay-05.infobox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528FA670055 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 20:33:07 +0400 (MSK) Message-ID: <4FAE90C2.8050108@webmaster.spb.ru> Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 20:33:06 +0400 From: denis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: xen-kernel + nfs + ezjail not working? X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 16:41:10 -0000 I have a server with centos-dom0 and freebsd 8.3-i386, and it works good on HVM-mode, but in pv: Starting sshd. ezjailConfiguring jails:. Starting jails:lock order reversal: 1st 0xc2691bdc nfs (nfs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_mount.c:1081 2nd 0xc2691ad0 devfs (devfs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2169 KDB: stack backtrace: X_db_sym_numargs(c038908b,c2634ce8,d59fa7ac,c0123d9b,eb302a43,...) at X_db_sym_numargs+0x146 kdb_backtrace(c011335b,c038c109,c22d16c8,c22d1250,d59fa854,...) at kdb_backtrace+0x2a witness_display_spinlock(c038c109,c2691ad0,c037a043,c22d1250,c0393993,...) at witness_display_spinlock+0x75 witness_checkorder(c2691ad0,9,c0393993,879,0,...) at witness_checkorder+0x839 __lockmgr_args(c2691ad0,80500,c2691aec,0,0,...) at __lockmgr_args+0x81c vop_stdlock(d59fa974,c0123d9b,c037a303,80500,c2691a78,...) at vop_stdlock+0x62 VOP_LOCK1_APV(c03c6020,d59fa974,c2681384,c03f9a80,c2691a78,...) at VOP_LOCK1_APV+0xb5 _vn_lock(c2691a78,80500,c0393993,879,8,...) at _vn_lock+0x5e vget(c2691a78,80500,c26812e0,164,c26812e0,...) at vget+0xb9 devfs_allocv(c2641e80,c24e778c,80000,d59faa0c,c056d85c,...) at devfs_allocv+0x105 devfs_rules_apply(c24e778c,80000,d59fac2c,447,0,...) at devfs_rules_apply+0x182 vfs_donmount(c26812e0,0,c2658500,c2658500,bf7fdb99,...) at vfs_donmount+0x14c2 nmount(c26812e0,d59facfc,c26812e0,c038c9bf,207,...) at nmount+0x75 syscall(d59fad38) at syscall+0x270 Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x22 --- syscall (378, FreeBSD ELF32, nmount), eip = 0x280e947b, esp = 0xbf7fdb6c, ebp = 0xbf7fe0c8 --- aqua2.wm. fbsd8# uname -a FreeBSD fbsd8.wm 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Sat May 12 19:01:01 MSK 2012 root@fbsd8.wm:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/XEN i386 Config for xen: kernel = "/var/xen/kernels/kernel.i386.pv/kernel" extra = "vfs.root.mountfrom=ufs:ad0s1a,machdep.idle_mwait=0,boot_verbose=1" memory = 512 name = "ezjail.pv" vcpus = 1 vif = [ 'bridge=xenbr0' ] disk = [ 'tap:aio:/mnt/1t/xen/nfs/freebsd8.img,hda,w' ] acpi=1 apic=1