Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 15:39:12 -0300 From: Luiz Otavio O Souza <loos.br@gmail.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> Cc: Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@freebsd.org>, freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: etherswitch regression? Message-ID: <153E652C-3C4F-4BEC-BDF9-C6038813A369@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmok5Bmh_=quuKz44Dygz0Jd9t_==Uro9QG%2BD%2BHRu1Wp5gA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ-Vmok5Bmh_=quuKz44Dygz0Jd9t_==Uro9QG%2BD%2BHRu1Wp5gA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 8, 2013, at 5:26 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi guys, >=20 > I've noticed this regression: >=20 > # etherswitchcfg > etherswitchcfg: ioctl(IOETHERSWITCHGETINFO): Inappropriate ioctl for = device >=20 > Is this just a userland mismatch? or? >=20 >=20 >=20 > adrian Hi Adrian, Yes this looks like a userland mismatch. Usually rebuilding = etherswitchcfg (with the new etherswitch.h) is enough to fix this. Luiz=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?153E652C-3C4F-4BEC-BDF9-C6038813A369>