From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 01:23:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A086D9E1 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 01:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84EBA8FC08 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 01:23:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:23:36 -0800 Message-ID: <50E23A95.80907@a1poweruser.com> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:23:33 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: utility to compare 2 dir trees Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jan 2013 01:23:36.0715 (UTC) FILETIME=[9F5DF5B0:01CDE7BE] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 01:23:35 -0000 I want to compare 2 different directory trees to each other to locate any differences in directories and files contained there in. Any suggestions? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 01:31:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9784EB0D for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 01:31:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com (mail-ob0-f175.google.com [209.85.214.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533768FC08 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 01:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id vb8so11758622obc.20 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:31:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=YcXgqAEr5hNDE9N4KYmU7B/Er3jmGKKSoD9wTxHUAuQ=; b=bozv7amO3VRPWflugzGwV7pDGwc8X+PWDqy0pmYnaMSiEqqts4dxKypu+GDEkK5cGT 7c32BNwQhhMDWgjE96MhYpo8MDYmvhRtMVDLlNGhWV7QeIUp2ps7EBzcXQ370JPtApmh 5CNcUI8c2Lk9y2E94DAjGFqSM3heOrh48pKg6XhmYev9QcO74fjAHw0gjXDjX3beMgXI 5TJFSOvGOXUlEkxDp13Uifoa9vdbQk8W6dsGGaqKB5BNA3MJ+GkbWZTkRmo9d8znwV0f sZtGQRUuVQv0SlIh69kcFeSHWrvwjTQq0BPDGrk/EIFyuKnK8rWdCObYDBDEsoFuVsCq SS0g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.121.97 with SMTP id lj1mr35210448obb.63.1357003906396; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:31:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.80.104 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:31:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50E23A95.80907@a1poweruser.com> References: <50E23A95.80907@a1poweruser.com> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 19:31:46 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: utility to compare 2 dir trees From: Adam Vande More To: Fbsd8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 01:31:53 -0000 On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > I want to compare 2 different directory trees to each other to locate any > differences in directories and files contained there in. > > Any suggestions? > mtree(8) -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 01:45:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88CDC10 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 01:45:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5319B8FC08 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 01:45:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:45:42 -0800 Message-ID: <50E23FC3.5060204@a1poweruser.com> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:45:39 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More Subject: Re: utility to compare 2 dir trees References: <50E23A95.80907@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jan 2013 01:45:42.0745 (UTC) FILETIME=[B5BE1490:01CDE7C1] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 01:45:42 -0000 Adam Vande More wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > >> I want to compare 2 different directory trees to each other to locate any >> differences in directories and files contained there in. >> >> Any suggestions? >> > > mtree(8) > From the man page I don't see how to code mtree to compare 2 different directory trees against each other. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 01:54:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A92CF3 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 01:54:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A511A8FC0A for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 01:54:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=LhLzQShmeAhEzsaAXEzVm5lgTHJuKmIpGkTOPEUmbcc=; b=HWl0NfE7nWICOIZVpHzPnXApkwCYufbYFfblhSa368/2r14Wj2mZaAlm3FZGWNR2bUXtt/86i9/LR0l8LnT72UN7sjed4XtycGY3uDKPidWXjJp1iZs4P0GHQng2ZvPW; Received: from [122.129.203.50] (port=62712 helo=X220.ovitrap.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Tpr3G-000EWI-PK; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:53:59 -0700 Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 08:53:55 +0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: utility to compare 2 dir trees Message-ID: <20130101085355.4e4767c2@X220.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <50E23FC3.5060204@a1poweruser.com> References: <50E23A95.80907@a1poweruser.com> <50E23FC3.5060204@a1poweruser.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: Adam Vande More , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 01:54:07 -0000 Hi, On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:45:39 -0500 Fbsd8 wrote: > Adam Vande More wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Fbsd8 > > wrote: > >=20 > >> I want to compare 2 different directory trees to each other to > >> locate any differences in directories and files contained there in. > >> > >> Any suggestions? > >> > >=20 > > mtree(8) > >=20 >=20 >=20 > From the man page I don't see how to code mtree to compare 2 > different directory trees against each other. you can compare a directory tree which is rooted in your current directory and a specified one. =46rom man: The mtree utility compares the file hierarchy rooted in the current directory against a specification read from the standard input. Messages are written to the standard output for any files whose characteristics do not match the specifications, or which are missing from either the file hierarchy or the specification. Erich > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 02:08:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2EB5DF9 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 02:08:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9FE8FC08 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 02:08:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690643CADC; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 03:08:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r0128h1l002293; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 03:08:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 03:08:43 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: changing prompt for user in jail Message-Id: <20130101030843.fce3ce7c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <50E1BC82.8060403@a1poweruser.com> References: <50E1BC82.8060403@a1poweruser.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 02:08:49 -0000 On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:25:38 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > Now when I login to the jail over remote ssh to the just created user > account I get the % prompt, then su to root and get the > set prompt = "# %/ >". > I want that same prompt for all user I create in the jail. Each user you add will have "predefined" dot files copied into his ~ directory. Those are obtained from /usr/share/skel. In order to make global settings available to all users, you have to do two things: 1st: Make sure (e. g. by removing the template or changing its content, commenting out or deleting lines) that they won't receive the "predefined" dot file from the skel/ subdirectory. 2nd: Make your change global in /etc/csh.cshrc. If you want root to participate, make sure /root/.cshrc does not define the following (or similar): set promptchars = "%#" set prompt = "%n@%m:%~%# " This will give you a standard UNIX prompt which will automatically add # for root and % for non-root as prompt character, as well as display the username, the hostname, and the working directory. Similarly to the approach mentioned, you can "globalize" the C shell's login and logout files: /etc/csh.login and /etc/csh.logout vs. ~/.login and ~/.logout (from /usr/share/skel/dot.login and /usr/share/skel/dot.logout). If users wish to override settings, they can do that in their home directory's dot files. > I tried putting the set prompt = "# %/ >" statement in the jail user > account /home/test/.cshrc file log out and back in to no effect. This is strange. Can you interactively change the prompt? > Them I put the set prompt = "# %/ >" statement in the jail's > /usr/share/skel/.cshrc and created a different user account > using the same pw command, still no joy. Maybe there's some relation to global files in /etc? But note: The files in /usr/share/skel have special names! If you want to create .cshrc, the name of the template must be dot.cshrc (literally 'd' 'o' 't' dot cshrc). The templates in this directory should already have this pattern. > Then I just added the set prompt = "# %/ >" statement in the jail's > /etc/csh.cshrc and created new jail user account and still no joy. > > I even tried putting the set prompt = "# %/ >" statement as the last > line in the files so it was out side of any if statements with no joy. If the shells invoked are login shells, you can add commands to the .login files; note that only interactive login shells will read them. > No matter what I do to the config of the jail files it makes no > difference when I use ssh to login to the jail user account. > > Anyone have any idea what I any doing wrong? > > Or is this just now jails work? It should at least work on "normal level". -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 02:09:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA253E9E for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 02:09:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81C38FC08 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 02:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:09:31 -0800 Message-ID: <50E24558.8040501@a1poweruser.com> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:09:28 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erich Dollansky Subject: Re: utility to compare 2 dir trees References: <50E23A95.80907@a1poweruser.com> <50E23FC3.5060204@a1poweruser.com> <20130101085355.4e4767c2@X220.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <20130101085355.4e4767c2@X220.ovitrap.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jan 2013 02:09:31.0937 (UTC) FILETIME=[099B7910:01CDE7C5] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: Adam Vande More , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 02:09:31 -0000 Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:45:39 -0500 > Fbsd8 wrote: > >> Adam Vande More wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Fbsd8 >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I want to compare 2 different directory trees to each other to >>>> locate any differences in directories and files contained there in. >>>> >>>> Any suggestions? >>>> >>> mtree(8) >>> >> >> From the man page I don't see how to code mtree to compare 2 >> different directory trees against each other. > > you can compare a directory tree which is rooted in your current > directory and a specified one. > > From man: > > The mtree utility compares the file hierarchy rooted in the current > directory against a specification read from the standard input. > Messages are written to the standard output for any files whose > characteristics do not match the specifications, or which are missing > from either the file hierarchy or the specification. > > Erich > So cd dir-tree1 mtree -p dir-tree2 Do I understand you correctly? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 02:11:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC335F46 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 02:11:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6587C8FC08 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 02:11:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25193CADC; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 03:11:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r012BRUH002322; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 03:11:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 03:11:25 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: changing prompt for user in jail Message-Id: <20130101031125.6f620d2d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <50E1CB88.6040906@a1poweruser.com> References: <50E1BC82.8060403@a1poweruser.com> <2851771356974131@web17h.yandex.ru> <50E1CB88.6040906@a1poweruser.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Aldis Berjoza , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 02:11:25 -0000 On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:29:44 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > Aldis Berjoza wrote: > > > > 31.12.2012, 18:26, "Fbsd8" : > > > >> Them I put the set prompt = "# %/ >" statement in the jail's > >> /usr/share/skel/.cshrc and created a different user account > >> using the same pw command, still no joy. > > > > Shouldn't that be /etc/skel/.cshrc ? > > > > Nope, no such directory as /etc/skel as part of base release. It might be a symlink to /usr/share/skel which is the standard location, as described in "man hier": /usr/ contains the majority of user utilities and applications share/ architecture-independent files skel/ example . (dot) files for new accounts -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 02:39:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0811C0 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 02:39:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77EC58FC08 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 02:39:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:39:49 -0800 Message-ID: <50E24C71.5090104@a1poweruser.com> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:39:45 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erich Dollansky Subject: Re: utility to compare 2 dir trees References: <50E23A95.80907@a1poweruser.com> <50E23FC3.5060204@a1poweruser.com> <20130101085355.4e4767c2@X220.ovitrap.com> <50E24558.8040501@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <50E24558.8040501@a1poweruser.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jan 2013 02:39:49.0763 (UTC) FILETIME=[451DB530:01CDE7C9] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: Adam Vande More , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 02:39:48 -0000 Fbsd8 wrote: > Erich Dollansky wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:45:39 -0500 >> Fbsd8 wrote: >> >>> Adam Vande More wrote: >>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Fbsd8 >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I want to compare 2 different directory trees to each other to >>>>> locate any differences in directories and files contained there in. >>>>> >>>>> Any suggestions? >>>>> >>>> mtree(8) >>>> >>> >>> From the man page I don't see how to code mtree to compare 2 >>> different directory trees against each other. >> >> you can compare a directory tree which is rooted in your current >> directory and a specified one. >> >> From man: >> >> The mtree utility compares the file hierarchy rooted in the current >> directory against a specification read from the standard input. >> Messages are written to the standard output for any files whose >> characteristics do not match the specifications, or which are missing >> from either the file hierarchy or the specification. >> >> Erich >> > > > So > cd dir-tree1 > mtree -p dir-tree2 > > Do I understand you correctly? > ended up trying cd dir-tree1 mtree -c | mtree -p dir-tree2 Now this seems like it worked, except every thing was flagged for non-matching modification time. How do I tell it to not check modification time? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 05:12:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923AE21F for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 05:12:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23BB28FC08 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 05:12:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id r015EuQh013368; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 23:14:56 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 23:14:56 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201301010514.r015EuQh013368@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: utility to compare 2 dir trees In-Reply-To: <50E23A95.80907@a1poweruser.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 05:12:17 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 31 19:26:37 2012 > Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:23:33 -0500 > From: Fbsd8 > To: FreeBSD Questions > Subject: utility to compare 2 dir trees > > I want to compare 2 different directory trees to each other to locate > any differences in directories and files contained there in. > > Any suggestions? 'man diff' From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 05:23:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB81304 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 05:23:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca) Received: from nm37-vm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm37-vm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.229.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0288FC08 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 05:23:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.138.90.51] by nm37.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jan 2013 05:19:58 -0000 Received: from [98.138.84.47] by tm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jan 2013 05:19:58 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp115.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jan 2013 05:19:58 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.ca; s=s1024; t=1357017598; bh=eBP3PJlab5ApkGESYgt9mlpj+eXtTsX16Pc5PriVyRo=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Received:MIME-Version:Received:Received:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Content-Type; b=XI+5Mu87E31A62BDObh9IAQPxsyfkGfPax5ROG3MwrsLQQwSgxDHtusl4YMmpI+Y3LbrT7cYNM3jPauBY24VXZ7C6chHwQUAEZzvBmH8CCtOaITHkEo5rr0mO9x8a/y2lNIcPLid95PVAU/g5XaeFwvRl0tanqE96s5vDfmcIMg= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 28780.96433.bm@smtp115.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: Bo7grtEVM1nELK9aaWcUozsU_L7euKbxMSMofsA4bjQj.cn 2hYbVLznWVORKJNYSraYtrf5PIPZnWYpCeDGgcSyaUK2DIsP1mYfJlqQjAyq AwzxcPek.8TkCElGcLhuFcDuM._RuDgWiniTjC4l5Dxs_vVM8o3segWL4tCJ OIxuKeg2dFd1n7kK1TPUOKrsZF8B2okWd05CIhzz4f.VPs.BPZOINkr4FKGU pg21AX5CZTs5PMvbbtrZkYsB7MyX.qQ4UmV_FONziCTnajViOgamJTwS1AGN rgtmWz_auib2ci92l7JlB71e3xOQEXe1UO3D7jMWJSwIaQjdcMkmxotkaIFR vTFHCBZ2a1rjE0wYlLYXK0ZHszLe4dwk5MdI_xBkjLYProt6AbhTmRSgLCUn jsRRevyCiQ6FcG_VLP4mbWE51fdQdtr_ih5E49vheev6uIYx7VFSJNjLAa8W Nh1QQJzVbH0upjNFC1A-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: Xr6qjFWswBAEmd20sAvB4Q3keqXvXsIH9TjJ Received: from mail-vb0-f48.google.com (moonlightakkiy@209.85.212.48 with plain) by smtp115.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Dec 2012 21:19:57 -0800 PST Received: by mail-vb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id fc21so13235848vbb.35 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:19:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.239.14 with SMTP id ku14mr66107687vcb.57.1357017597375; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:19:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.182.72 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:19:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 22:19:57 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: buffalo wli-uc-gn wireless card sometimes unusable and emit "run0: wcid=xx out of range" From: PseudoCylon To: Jov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 05:23:20 -0000 > Message: 13 > Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:11:04 +0800 > From: Jov > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: buffalo wli-uc-gn wireless card sometimes unusable and emit > "run0: wcid=xx out of range" > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > hi experts: > I think the hardware is ok because I can use it in Win7. And in Freebsd > 9.1,it works for sometime,but sometimes after system reboot or I plug out & > plug in the card it my unusable.on the console it emmit: > "run0: wcid=xx out of range" where xx is 91,87 and etc. Please try attached patch. Reboot or re-plug-in shouldn't be a cause of the problem. Receiving an association ID larger than device's max (64) is the problem. You must be using a high-end AP. Reboot or re-plug-in initiate re-association and just happen to receive a large association ID. AK --begin patch-- diff --git a/dev/usb/wlan/if_run.c b/dev/usb/wlan/if_run.c index 3d2577f..ed11d97 100644 --- a/dev/usb/wlan/if_run.c +++ b/dev/usb/wlan/if_run.c @@ -2019,7 +2019,8 @@ run_key_set_cb(void *arg) wcid = 0; /* NB: update WCID0 for group keys */ base = RT2860_SKEY(RUN_VAP(vap)->rvp_id, k->wk_keyix); } else { - wcid = RUN_AID2WCID(associd); + wcid = (vap->iv_opmode == IEEE80211_M_STA) ? + 1 : RUN_AID2WCID(associd); base = RT2860_PKEY(wcid); } @@ -2374,9 +2375,12 @@ run_newassoc(struct ieee80211_node *ni, int isnew) struct run_softc *sc = ic->ic_ifp->if_softc; uint8_t rate; uint8_t ridx; - uint8_t wcid = RUN_AID2WCID(ni->ni_associd); + uint8_t wcid; int i, j; + wcid = (vap->iv_opmode == IEEE80211_M_STA) ? + 1 : RUN_AID2WCID(ni->ni_associd); + if (wcid > RT2870_WCID_MAX) { device_printf(sc->sc_dev, "wcid=%d out of range\n", wcid); return; @@ -3044,8 +3048,12 @@ run_tx(struct run_softc *sc, struct mbuf *m, struct ieee80211_node *ni) txd->flags = qflags; txwi = (struct rt2860_txwi *)(txd + 1); txwi->xflags = xflags; - txwi->wcid = IEEE80211_IS_MULTICAST(wh->i_addr1) ? - 0 : RUN_AID2WCID(ni->ni_associd); + if (IEEE80211_IS_MULTICAST(wh->i_addr1)) + txwi->wcid = 0; + else { + txwi->wcid = (vap->iv_opmode == IEEE80211_M_STA) ? + 1 : RUN_AID2WCID(ni->ni_associd); + } /* clear leftover garbage bits */ txwi->flags = 0; txwi->txop = 0; From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 05:41:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29C1447 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 05:41:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhao6014@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (mail-wi0-f176.google.com [209.85.212.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBCB8FC12 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 05:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hm6so9684235wib.15 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:41:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Z75tp2rNPwP3Ut/ESb+OHMSHx+GQvB34KlQvM3z2DJI=; b=HE9FmEoF1bD6ZSAI+31RIix1ct+0aWqhewbUppTC4jbY7MjvqDoCaA6lGKBF+OABa0 4PqVfFkBdkdt4jQOKm2ap7cjCwWYXD1qHmd+9/jqhIRR4Gud1H+bQbG59PaRhAAU76SB wJvNJUJKf8dJY3HDSx+GTVy5Y1loVwKfNG/AionTWtI80aWbYqw15WjjtVOUllrrTEGh rW8WfEi94Y8B2puMOzumxiAf6LwyODL9Z17JLTywbnTgEljXz1Cjjjj6FG87C30LBk70 lMwDXlfMfNkzORsZhH71PSiCdWdc8Qm2GzcD06HUjCQVa7Rlwq73Fn6JMUPwYqlwb+xh 9xsg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.73.202 with SMTP id n10mr65425120wiv.17.1357018881770; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:41:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.47.71 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:41:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.47.71 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 21:41:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 13:41:21 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: buffalo wli-uc-gn wireless card sometimes unusable and emit "run0: wcid=xx out of range" From: Jov To: PseudoCylon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 05:41:29 -0000 thanks very much=A3=ACi will try the patch. jov =D4=DA 2013-1-1 =CF=C2=CE=E71:19=A3=AC"PseudoCylon" =D0=B4=B5=C0=A3=BA > > Message: 13 > > Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:11:04 +0800 > > From: Jov > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: buffalo wli-uc-gn wireless card sometimes unusable and emit > > "run0: wcid=3Dxx out of range" > > Message-ID: > > < > CADyrUxPrP6OS2mpK51yiwoG-jKwTQ+XpOP48uZQ+Y15_oUr9Sg@mail.gmail.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1 > > > > hi experts: > > I think the hardware is ok because I can use it in Win7. And in Freebsd > > 9.1,it works for sometime,but sometimes after system reboot or I plug > out & > > plug in the card it my unusable.on the console it emmit: > > "run0: wcid=3Dxx out of range" where xx is 91,87 and etc. > > Please try attached patch. > > Reboot or re-plug-in shouldn't be a cause of the problem. Receiving an > association ID larger than device's max (64) is the problem. You must > be using a high-end AP. Reboot or re-plug-in initiate re-association > and just happen to receive a large association ID. > > > AK > > > --begin patch-- > > diff --git a/dev/usb/wlan/if_run.c b/dev/usb/wlan/if_run.c > index 3d2577f..ed11d97 100644 > --- a/dev/usb/wlan/if_run.c > +++ b/dev/usb/wlan/if_run.c > @@ -2019,7 +2019,8 @@ run_key_set_cb(void *arg) > wcid =3D 0; /* NB: update WCID0 for group keys */ > base =3D RT2860_SKEY(RUN_VAP(vap)->rvp_id, k->wk_keyix); > } else { > - wcid =3D RUN_AID2WCID(associd); > + wcid =3D (vap->iv_opmode =3D=3D IEEE80211_M_STA) ? > + 1 : RUN_AID2WCID(associd); > base =3D RT2860_PKEY(wcid); > } > > @@ -2374,9 +2375,12 @@ run_newassoc(struct ieee80211_node *ni, int isnew) > struct run_softc *sc =3D ic->ic_ifp->if_softc; > uint8_t rate; > uint8_t ridx; > - uint8_t wcid =3D RUN_AID2WCID(ni->ni_associd); > + uint8_t wcid; > int i, j; > > + wcid =3D (vap->iv_opmode =3D=3D IEEE80211_M_STA) ? > + 1 : RUN_AID2WCID(ni->ni_associd); > + > if (wcid > RT2870_WCID_MAX) { > device_printf(sc->sc_dev, "wcid=3D%d out of range\n", wci= d); > return; > @@ -3044,8 +3048,12 @@ run_tx(struct run_softc *sc, struct mbuf *m, > struct ieee80211_node *ni) > txd->flags =3D qflags; > txwi =3D (struct rt2860_txwi *)(txd + 1); > txwi->xflags =3D xflags; > - txwi->wcid =3D IEEE80211_IS_MULTICAST(wh->i_addr1) ? > - 0 : RUN_AID2WCID(ni->ni_associd); > + if (IEEE80211_IS_MULTICAST(wh->i_addr1)) > + txwi->wcid =3D 0; > + else { > + txwi->wcid =3D (vap->iv_opmode =3D=3D IEEE80211_M_STA) ? > + 1 : RUN_AID2WCID(ni->ni_associd); > + } > /* clear leftover garbage bits */ > txwi->flags =3D 0; > txwi->txop =3D 0; > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 06:23:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A43616CF for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 06:23:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC9D8FC08 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 06:23:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.6/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r016NeXE034050 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Jan 2013 06:23:40 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk r016NeXE034050 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/r016NeXE034050; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Message-ID: <50E280E3.3050401@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 06:23:31 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: utility to compare 2 dir trees References: <50E23A95.80907@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <50E23A95.80907@a1poweruser.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig50B034E1FA23E6938857B7BC" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 06:23:52 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig50B034E1FA23E6938857B7BC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/01/2013 01:23, Fbsd8 wrote: > I want to compare 2 different directory trees to each other to locate > any differences in directories and files contained there in. >=20 > Any suggestions? diff -ru directory1 directory2 Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig50B034E1FA23E6938857B7BC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDigOsACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzlewCfVQvZxX0mVi6/d1thz191TAPU 1EYAn0mA607xh8JkpbKzdi5SYq1WfdMP =/Ri9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig50B034E1FA23E6938857B7BC-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 10:41:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 638A82D1 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 10:41:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talayeh.asadi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com (mail-ie0-f175.google.com [209.85.223.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EAC8FC0A for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 10:41:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id qd14so15520137ieb.6 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 02:41:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:from:date:x-google-sender-auth :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=2wZ5Fi2TZiRw+VXUb4/Q+t8qgYDosE1S9eGQ4hcBIfY=; b=XyehONUApy0tu8rr3Q4CTeh+l6U/Ro4KWqVARvX8Oa6nr3mdbW3tEJ6towJZWgqh1Q CLEmyU3j4sSnSvjHEPUQ4kQT3FkbAQB7My5Am9NwuLVx27LRzZSgg7VECqhSRvmn3yr6 Jzefw/YB//CdaSRnWEZHz/arkoBv6U9H6du3AijXpHf8D9FNIAK30gBC4rClKhl6BSAJ LHsJISEEwhklJ7bKxfra1EDJLMhr6X9wtUXGDQAN7ODUXZZGtWk1kOT1mpHDXCTWAw8y 1d2VEHB0wLQtq8QwjwVMr+VvmpZrOu+mg4jeQAibeW0xdpMNNSKd0PuTz1WNNrjigEHR QYJg== Received: by 10.42.27.145 with SMTP id j17mr22997661icc.13.1357036903149; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 02:41:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: talayeh.asadi@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.161.130 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 02:41:21 -0800 (PST) From: takCoder Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 14:11:21 +0330 X-Google-Sender-Auth: zuSSVQMEA5sC6pIqP28QJnvqk84 Message-ID: Subject: ssh server hashcode change on nanoBSD To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: tak.official@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 10:41:44 -0000 hi everyone, i've got a nanoBSD server. when i ssh to it from another bsd system, first time everything is fine. the source bsd system asks me whether i trust my nanoSBD server or not and i apply y and the nanoBSD hash key is written in known_hosts file. everything is fine until i restart my nanoBSD server. the problem is that each time i restart my server, the source system is complaining about that i need to edit my known_hosts file cause my nanoBSD hash-code is not matched.. how can i fix this?! it really bothers me cause i think of it as a security problem.. i can't risk such things on my server.. would someone please give me a hand on this? always grateful of all your helps here :) Best Regards, t.a.k From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 12:36:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64A4F47 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 12:36:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talayeh.asadi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f170.google.com (mail-ie0-f170.google.com [209.85.223.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F05E8FC08 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 12:36:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id k10so16217706iea.29 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 04:36:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=VeQoeVuktM4ZSXRhmSQWILc/49sgVdQ4rO/o8f/+4dU=; b=UkqkFqDl6C161EhEW/MEpIuRb9YRFAt6GBeMT5BRyJOcShGJInWDj8vtSxHbraUTNS jZb9g9v1xh4e7NIf4nQm33XnF6cLrGOIKBlYncv1G/s7uDHRPwCrHOdtSipyNTmvZwG/ MN3uLBakbe2ST3WC9+KvgSPqNEvotD/8rHxX/1HHfwG1iiqRq0kuQnhMDVIN2OfZIJBL klQbJwxPUlOl3yVZZ/RO/zCQ8bWQpBqUQXngMZvYC+RTSDcyFm/ZFyQgKastQevEkNLJ 0hJ5GdnmT32dVYCrcLVbOA5qAGThOzhbQHkux4YOLPkRBbOEvisZy9TDBxxqbftKsph8 N+uA== Received: by 10.42.121.1 with SMTP id h1mr32939163icr.43.1357043807086; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 04:36:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: talayeh.asadi@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.161.130 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 04:36:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: takCoder Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 16:06:26 +0330 X-Google-Sender-Auth: B-2CUqL8XzrprBHBIMD0mPEW7_8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ssh server hashcode change on nanoBSD To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: tak.official@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 12:36:54 -0000 >---------- Forwarded message ---------- >From: Aldis Berjoza >Date: Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:17 PM >Subject: Re: ssh server hashcode change on nanoBSD > >I've never used NanoBSD, but, check if ssh daemon can write to /etc/ssh/ otherwise it >won't be able to save ssh_host_* keys >Or you can create ssh_host keys and embed them in you NanoBSD image >-- >Aldis Berjoza >FreeBSD addict thank you :) for the ones who know about nanobsd, i've got a /cfg on nanobsd. during nanoBsd startup, files in /etc are replaced with their new version in /cfg, if any; (as /etc is a md here). so, in the case i explained above, i just needed to copy /etc/ssh/* to /cfg/ssh/ and now, everything is fine :) Best Regards, t.a.k Best Regards, t.a.k On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:11 PM, takCoder wrote: > hi everyone, > > i've got a nanoBSD server. when i ssh to it from another bsd system, > first time everything is fine. the source bsd system asks me whether i > trust my nanoSBD server or not and i apply y and the nanoBSD hash key is > written in known_hosts file. > > everything is fine until i restart my nanoBSD server. the problem is that > each time i restart my server, the source system is complaining about that > i need to edit my known_hosts file cause my nanoBSD hash-code is not > matched.. > > how can i fix this?! it really bothers me cause i think of it as a > security problem.. i can't risk such things on my server.. > > would someone please give me a hand on this? > > always grateful of all your helps here :) > > Best Regards, > t.a.k > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 12:53:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD1B2A1 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 12:53:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084B28FC0C for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 12:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tq1LF-0003an-5a for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 13:53:13 +0100 Received: from 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 13:53:13 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 13:53:13 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jb Subject: FB 9.1 - =?utf-8?b?ZW11bGF0b3JzL2xpbnV4X2Jhc2UtZjEw?= build error Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 12:52:46 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 28 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 12:53:02 -0000 Hi, # portmaster /usr/ports/www/nspluginwrapper ... ===>>> www/nspluginwrapper >> accessibility/linux-f10-atk >> emulators/linux_base-f10 (2/2) ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10 ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE ===>>> linuxulator is not (kld)loaded ===>>> If you are sure you can build it, remove the IGNORE line in the Makefile and try again. ===>>> Update for emulators/linux_base-f10 failed ===>>> Aborting update ===>>> Update for accessibility/linux-f10-atk failed ===>>> Aborting update # Why marked IGNORE ? jb From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 13:02:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4886A3AD for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 13:02:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bekimbislimi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com (mail-wg0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0858FC12 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 13:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id dq12so6313771wgb.24 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 05:01:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject :message-id:date:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=47DEQpj8HBSa+/TImW+5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU=; b=SBZnf/Pg5Nf2mxoNuzLR7W0yuTgjpSg1Ag+rILoQaDEbB/CBs50UqwCLUKmr4H9mcJ L6IbsFvVv/mlGnTkYs2mUJzkZQ73Ap5Z+FRs9+ya87jgcmAhSj/SDdFAhjRs7tr/B756 dACuEdXYGPQRmBAwoYaEAS8Lny9QQndP8E8gbEU9uuFOPTAOnSysYiW9QHSRxk47ziek aQLM+p4ThoGPwwdoKDtd8K0AMKR3FdG8PTqnxUx9v+I7pbMl5E1myRJA7mcmH8z5YKfR NeXyLFkYJMeVFDvU6zhum4PJ0qoVLZ89rnLozaVwiCtzLeHnfe3g+q/wZmoacs3Fgcv+ +oGw== X-Received: by 10.194.90.238 with SMTP id bz14mr59538834wjb.9.1357045317419; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 05:01:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.84] ([178.175.77.201]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e6sm21235061wiz.1.2013.01.01.05.01.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 01 Jan 2013 05:01:56 -0800 (PST) From: Bekim's Mac Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: http://localhost/phpmyadmin Message-Id: <05438C84-410F-4E27-A8CF-FE818689B8DA@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 14:01:53 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.1 \(1498\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1498) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 13:02:04 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 13:20:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E14F5FE for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 13:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B41D8FC0A for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 13:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.6/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r01DKDNF039744 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 13:20:14 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk r01DKDNF039744 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/r01DKDNF039744; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Message-ID: <50E2E286.3050706@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 13:20:06 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: http://localhost/phpmyadmin References: <05438C84-410F-4E27-A8CF-FE818689B8DA@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <05438C84-410F-4E27-A8CF-FE818689B8DA@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig74E18BCA6F7C24F6880B9B22" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 13:20:20 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig74E18BCA6F7C24F6880B9B22 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/01/2013 13:01, Bekim's Mac wrote: >=20 It's traditional to actually ask a question... Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig74E18BCA6F7C24F6880B9B22 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDi4o0ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxZiACffQ1TMxBhgAB/RuRM3wSrmtY5 oHgAoJVjNluTe6uYja0oGwDpZ+SOK/eh =0IeP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig74E18BCA6F7C24F6880B9B22-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 13:23:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8C26A2 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 13:23:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080568FC0A for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 13:23:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8E8241D1 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 14:22:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r01DN2fY007241 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 14:23:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 14:23:02 +0100 From: Polytropon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: http://localhost/phpmyadmin Message-Id: <20130101142302.fd8053a3.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <05438C84-410F-4E27-A8CF-FE818689B8DA@gmail.com> References: <05438C84-410F-4E27-A8CF-FE818689B8DA@gmail.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 13:23:07 -0000 On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 14:01:53 +0100, Bekim's Mac wrote: > {nothing} My PHP admin has no idea what to answer. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 13:25:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1032973C for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 13:25:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kazakevichilya@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com (mail-ob0-f176.google.com [209.85.214.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0B58FC0C for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 13:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id un3so12110038obb.21 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 05:24:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=t70Asm92Ox864dSmDDwqqadvNOV77y6E4daYw+NlVZs=; b=Iy8pfkhe7/mVelKdqrVhSkUfZaehSvvbqyB8huVOEvHmw2MvJuMpCu/jF5Wfh9YNdh osrzdSxZrzQqXAxLCqfxunjeChy7Cae9a0Q+yEtp5dXDpiH+2xJXh7gK3ojmPPZzPnOx sHvXLArSPbcS/6qIPw7eyh1MyTkHdj/LmYiM9weG5c+I8XeMXljThSUV2ARCvCBK5V90 CC7My2hIsvwfSUgERx0A+fUMKaes3WyH6MT/owyHXyERlKOod+mcjjLRC33eb+bRRfUk LD+5610O9VmzrU7YVXtg9FaXg2f/xK3KAI8lCpWqxNk8IEqq0xU+ue/D7fhbrT+KEh8N 0A9Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.18.165 with SMTP id x5mr36823434obd.73.1357046694526; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 05:24:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.38.104 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 05:24:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <05438C84-410F-4E27-A8CF-FE818689B8DA@gmail.com> References: <05438C84-410F-4E27-A8CF-FE818689B8DA@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 17:24:54 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: http://localhost/phpmyadmin From: Ilya Kazakevich To: "Bekim's Mac" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 13:25:01 -0000 To open some url you need to use web browser. Sending URL to freebsd mail list would not open it. On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Bekim's Mac wrote: > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 14:40:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1CBC3B for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 14:40:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264D88FC0C for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 14:40:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFD83CA98; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 15:40:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r01EeL51007887; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 15:40:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 15:40:21 +0100 From: Polytropon To: tak.official@gmail.com Subject: Re: ssh server hashcode change on nanoBSD Message-Id: <20130101154021.322bef33.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:40:22 -0000 On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 14:11:21 +0330, takCoder wrote: > everything is fine until i restart my nanoBSD server. the problem is that > each time i restart my server, the source system is complaining about that > i need to edit my known_hosts file cause my nanoBSD hash-code is not > matched.. > > how can i fix this?! it really bothers me cause i think of it as a security > problem.. i can't risk such things on my server.. You should make the key permanent (i. e. include it on the boot media you're using). In case no key is found at sshd startup, a new one will be generated - a different one each time, of course. So what you're seeing seems to be "normal", even though not desired at all. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 15:29:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FF84B4 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 15:29:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talayeh.asadi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ia0-f172.google.com (mail-ia0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FAF8FC0A for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 15:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f172.google.com with SMTP id z13so11363931iaz.31 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 07:29:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=I6H+kS9GiPucZCQIkCSkLd1aX9VNTPiWF9id4HhbGy4=; b=IZOOI3ICqoUB6qKW3lxRvUYJAq0Jt1oVOL6h+2ENUKs7bOcM1GevwIcgcB4fdSq400 r79mzXIOWnw0qc0yu4KIxOae2+YH6/YijSaMDo32IurCwIhD/iJASyiSZ2BpJh732j+e zQUH7XPcUwGzunsBotERLTAPtj/XHhb8sC97GW0jCXAf7bNL9TnIBEwwd3+R/8Z7piC3 HceGALR2zqOb5JxR2kJuT400jhxCLMxqHu+i8awNu3TBXlRk5/wh/ieSffMRKFJMI8e8 oh4GHPlZtLOHW2i1KRdsl6zo2e28VvT0reJbVl6WUrHMEqTOujhP7NDAU9HY1DsEAXoS bucw== Received: by 10.50.140.34 with SMTP id rd2mr31887421igb.81.1357054165107; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 07:29:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: talayeh.asadi@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.161.130 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 07:29:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130101154021.322bef33.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20130101154021.322bef33.freebsd@edvax.de> From: takCoder Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 18:59:05 +0330 X-Google-Sender-Auth: TkHxqj8EYV7IPeTTPiJ0bWAfaZQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: ssh server hashcode change on nanoBSD To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: tak.official@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 15:29:32 -0000 thank you for the details mentioned :) but now, a questions occurred to me about this ssh key. as i don't know enough about its process, would you please tell me whether this key is a shared key for all ssh clients who send a request? or it differs as the client changes? (this question may sound a bit newbiesh, but i don't know much about the ssh process, sorry :) ) Best Regards, t.a.k On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Polytropon wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 14:11:21 +0330, takCoder wrote: > > everything is fine until i restart my nanoBSD server. the problem is that > > each time i restart my server, the source system is complaining about > that > > i need to edit my known_hosts file cause my nanoBSD hash-code is not > > matched.. > > > > how can i fix this?! it really bothers me cause i think of it as a > security > > problem.. i can't risk such things on my server.. > > You should make the key permanent (i. e. include it on the > boot media you're using). In case no key is found at sshd > startup, a new one will be generated - a different one each > time, of course. So what you're seeing seems to be "normal", > even though not desired at all. :-) > > > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 17:05:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A85CE01 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 17:05:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com (mail-ee0-f46.google.com [74.125.83.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB818FC14 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 17:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f46.google.com with SMTP id e53so6467345eek.19 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 09:05:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fj7eLb53APwypkVhLe/roVMdRC2/dcv2ikXrNnkaLy0=; b=PCNosjEKK5YtgmsCsuduh09hPimT3rMLQr4jSirCXA322mLwGPdLvNhrsot27oq3gl A0xwcQj22pVbsSzHrJhxs855VJgO1nYv+nNNIpAJkysVSZjNJaC9ZFXhsdPWODH1Qzkp 91ETdO099I/93bpzgJD1mLtkCueQ1c9v2lk+Tox9wAUg6xBgdcDazMobQjMlaRu00YKU sjFsE9hyUwQOGyJTbW4b+UXDSTarCAy4OJpKUz54TGaKtAy2D25bkFF5Cxy0MWQG+Rpj X572zmLYVqZJXxnAsJJs1EWPZXo2hzcsR/NEuesoGRnHV/fmCUZPG67bQaS5RLkMAALB 4lAw== X-Received: by 10.14.2.66 with SMTP id 42mr119528683eee.7.1357059911093; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 09:05:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from Melon.malikania.fr (110.89.123.78.rev.sfr.net. [78.123.89.110]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q44sm92230657eep.5.2013.01.01.09.05.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 01 Jan 2013 09:05:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50E31739.20201@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:04:57 +0100 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FB 9.1 - emulators/linux_base-f10 build error References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 17:05:13 -0000 On 01/01/2013 13:52, jb wrote: > ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10 > > ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE > ===>>> linuxulator is not (kld)loaded It is said there : ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10 ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE ===>>> linuxulator is not (kld)loaded Do you have linux emulation enabled? Such as linux_enable="YES" in your /etc/rc.conf Cheers, David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 17:49:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B2B763 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 17:49:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0278FC0A for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 17:49:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 1 Jan 2013 09:49:20 -0800 Message-ID: <50E3219D.3010300@a1poweruser.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 12:49:17 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Changing value of uname -r Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jan 2013 17:49:20.0489 (UTC) FILETIME=[53CDAD90:01CDE848] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 17:49:25 -0000 uname -r returns 10.0-CURRENT setenv UNAME_r "9.0-RELEASE" uname -r now returns 9.0-RELEASE How to reset uname -r to original value without doing setenv UNAME_r "10.0-CURRENT"? Is there some way just to deactivate the effect of the setenv UNAME_r so it returns to the real value of the system? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 18:17:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B716D99 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 18:17:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A6B8FC08 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 18:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tq6PE-0007Xk-PZ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 19:17:40 +0100 Received: from 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 19:17:40 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 19:17:40 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jb Subject: Re: FB 9.1 - =?utf-8?b?ZW11bGF0b3JzL2xpbnV4X2Jhc2UtZjEw?= build error Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 18:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <50E31739.20201@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:17:28 -0000 David Demelier gmail.com> writes: > ... > Do you have linux emulation enabled? Such as linux_enable="YES" in your > /etc/rc.conf > > Cheers, > David Yes, indeed, that was the cause. Thanks. jb From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 18:31:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BD57A8 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 18:31:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenthe@comcast.net) Received: from qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D668FC12 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 18:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta18.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.90]) by qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id iiBE1k0061wpRvQ54iXRLK; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:31:25 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([68.42.13.245]) by omta18.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id iiXQ1k0095HDiR83eiXQsi; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:31:25 +0000 Message-ID: <50E32B7C.3040803@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 13:31:24 -0500 From: Jason Lenthe User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fbsd8 , FreeBSD Subject: Re: Changing value of uname -r References: <50E3219D.3010300@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <50E3219D.3010300@a1poweruser.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1357065085; bh=13smx24taLBVm8QO/etDYnD7ATsginI+8PMWHAWhCaM=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=qk+bv4VKeJ2nyjZ0jPlZpiyh6goTxEc+42vJgZaBQCaJpYIQfiqPyBseEKZ4KLZzl SrdWmAz/aIWbT1h//Y57+Irgm33b71v8rcuS4770wqp7uE3svk7Owb+t17RUgR/wuE FPUxrW3TbcLRN5JKr5NfNrsTY6B9fQdqswAr3TyyxZ5PxIi306Era7dtSxmV/Vt6+l T6XGGMVcP8gJIdpvDT1VI7pYW4KciRbJJP+Wlkr69eI//r4vlXZkE4TNCyHL7zNWHG ldnAVwQ7wORRZaV7wJuwY2tyz9u3AwHaj07zvGaY0ZcXyotY1ltChHwltBEAo3Jl2n WPmzVu/31wnZg== X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:31:26 -0000 On 01/01/13 12:49, Fbsd8 wrote: > Is there some way just to deactivate the effect of the > setenv UNAME_r so it returns to the real value of the system? I think you just want to do: unsetenv UNAME_r From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 19:11:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB74DC5 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 19:11:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400BE8FC0A for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 19:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.42]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37B3A71599 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 14:11:30 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 4130 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2013 19:11:30 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 7683, pid: 30006, t: 0.1669s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 1 Jan 2013 19:11:30 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7762133C1D; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 14:11:24 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id C7C0C39855; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 14:11:23 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: tak.official@gmail.com Subject: Re: ssh server hashcode change on nanoBSD References: <20130101154021.322bef33.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:11:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: (takCoder's message of "Tue, 1 Jan 2013 18:59:05 +0330") Message-ID: <44y5gciuqs.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 19:11:38 -0000 Don't top-post, please. takCoder writes: > but now, a questions occurred to me about this ssh key. > as i don't know enough about its process, would you please tell me whether > this key is a shared key for all ssh clients who send a request? or it > differs as the client changes? There are a number of keys involved in ssh. The host keys are used at the start of the connection to make sure that some other machine doesn't impersonate the one you wanted. The encryption of the data happens with per-session keys, which are not only different for each client, but for every session. The two types of keys are not related to each other. > (this question may sound a bit newbiesh, but i don't know much about the > ssh process, sorry :) ) Cryptography in general is quite complicated, and ssh is a lot more complicated than just its cryptography. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 19:16:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2814E7E for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 19:16:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3FB8FC0A for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 19:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id 16so12168416obc.41 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 11:16:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=HTmby+gD3Eel9rtpbHsSd3Mqk5HzZ3wRc7IoImadEeQ=; b=h49RzTr0vXbtDj7x5BLgy/sEzRCTI1qgJZzPa2JagHB/igD8U9D4BtlV5KfoN6w1bR Uxnc6V8qguEAYhUHymse6iXKjNjWi/ybl5TtmMCDEZ9gsYw1MLHvstWKOW1kUAAznJ9g YabBI+MEGjwtc4XBaboyUEbz+UyYiWDpU4vQiClwCnLFMsm8RYpkO810WvXek01VEfyn 9plYNizCNdITeFD+/1V40ed+/8vlmbQ+5CI/7nSG0fSAGaLrZpjqVEJEZkkVlwRJBNqU 59JsLj5gPG6EoZsqaW4dMaJ+qjmMMhMCGylf44SyzLdwtoiynru6oxxTXvLIfUuhH5FQ M86w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.4.226 with SMTP id n2mr24634688oen.63.1357067801888; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 11:16:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.80.104 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 11:16:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50E24C71.5090104@a1poweruser.com> References: <50E23A95.80907@a1poweruser.com> <50E23FC3.5060204@a1poweruser.com> <20130101085355.4e4767c2@X220.ovitrap.com> <50E24558.8040501@a1poweruser.com> <50E24C71.5090104@a1poweruser.com> Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 13:16:41 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: utility to compare 2 dir trees From: Adam Vande More To: Fbsd8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Erich Dollansky , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 19:16:49 -0000 On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > ended up trying > cd dir-tree1 > mtree -c | mtree -p dir-tree2 > > Now this seems like it worked, except every thing was flagged for > non-matching modification time. How do I tell it to not check modification > time? > mtree -c -k sha256digest,uname,gname | mtree -p dir-tree2 -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 19:38:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62ED3E2 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 19:38:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D408FC08 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 19:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 1 Jan 2013 11:38:30 -0800 Message-ID: <50E33B32.80600@a1poweruser.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:38:26 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Lenthe Subject: Re: Changing value of uname -r References: <50E3219D.3010300@a1poweruser.com> <50E32B7C.3040803@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <50E32B7C.3040803@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jan 2013 19:38:30.0243 (UTC) FILETIME=[93C2D330:01CDE857] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 19:38:29 -0000 Jason Lenthe wrote: > On 01/01/13 12:49, Fbsd8 wrote: >> Is there some way just to deactivate the effect of the >> setenv UNAME_r so it returns to the real value of the system? > > I think you just want to do: unsetenv UNAME_r > Yes that worked. Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 1 21:10:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62FA792E for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 21:10:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (mx-out.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97068FC0C for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 21:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb1) id r01LDSbF022951; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 15:13:28 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 15:13:28 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-Id: <201301012113.r01LDSbF022951@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Changing value of uname -r In-Reply-To: <50E3219D.3010300@a1poweruser.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 21:10:53 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 1 11:52:49 2013 > Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 12:49:17 -0500 > From: Fbsd8 > To: FreeBSD Questions > Subject: Changing value of uname -r > > uname -r returns 10.0-CURRENT > > setenv UNAME_r "9.0-RELEASE" > > uname -r now returns 9.0-RELEASE > > How to reset uname -r to original value without doing > setenv UNAME_r "10.0-CURRENT"? > > Is there some way just to deactivate the effect of the > setenv UNAME_r so it returns to the real value of the system? Did you try: unsetenv UNAME_r If yes, what were the results? If no, _why_not_? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 00:20:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A055A97 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 00:20:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@chthonixia.net) Received: from www5.pairlite.com (www5.pairlite.com [64.130.10.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F9B8FC08 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 00:20:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whisperer.chthonixia.net (unknown [184.152.30.105]) by www5.pairlite.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 823312E2E3 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 19:20:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 19:21:10 -0500 From: Joe Altman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: freebsd-update: fale? Message-ID: <20130102002110.GA7209@whisperer.chthonixia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:20:44 -0000 Greetings, list. I have the following error; though I can load update5.FreeBSD.org in a browser: root-is-on-fire # freebsd-update fetch Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found. Fetching public key from update4.FreeBSD.org... failed. Fetching public key from update5.FreeBSD.org... failed. Fetching public key from update3.FreeBSD.org... failed. No mirrors remaining, giving up. Am I missing something in this process? Regards, Joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 02:01:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC67D866 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 02:01:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E23B8FC0C for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 02:01:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 1 Jan 2013 18:01:37 -0800 Message-ID: <50E394FD.7070002@a1poweruser.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 21:01:33 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Bonomi Subject: Re: Changing value of uname -r References: <201301012113.r01LDSbF022951@mail.r-bonomi.com> In-Reply-To: <201301012113.r01LDSbF022951@mail.r-bonomi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jan 2013 02:01:37.0474 (UTC) FILETIME=[1937EA20:01CDE88D] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 02:01:36 -0000 Robert Bonomi wrote: >> From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 1 11:52:49 2013 >> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 12:49:17 -0500 >> From: Fbsd8 >> To: FreeBSD Questions >> Subject: Changing value of uname -r >> >> uname -r returns 10.0-CURRENT >> >> setenv UNAME_r "9.0-RELEASE" >> >> uname -r now returns 9.0-RELEASE >> >> How to reset uname -r to original value without doing >> setenv UNAME_r "10.0-CURRENT"? >> >> Is there some way just to deactivate the effect of the >> setenv UNAME_r so it returns to the real value of the system? > > Did you try: > unsetenv UNAME_r > > If yes, what were the results? > > If no, _why_not_? > > yes unsetenv UNAME_r worked. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 02:10:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577E39CD for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 02:10:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7418FC0A for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 02:10:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 1 Jan 2013 18:10:25 -0800 Message-ID: <50E3970D.20000@a1poweruser.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 21:10:21 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: how to delete link in port packing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jan 2013 02:10:25.0847 (UTC) FILETIME=[54273C70:01CDE88E] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 02:10:24 -0000 In a port I am working on I have a link for home -> /user/home In the ports pkg-plist I can delete every thing but that darn link. Is there some statement along the line of %%EXAMPLESDIR%%default/home/lab1/.profile that will delete the @home link? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 02:30:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225AABF2 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 02:30:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05BF68FC0C for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 02:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 1 Jan 2013 18:30:02 -0800 Message-ID: <50E39BA7.2050303@a1poweruser.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 21:29:59 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: how to delete link in port packing list References: <50E3970D.20000@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <50E3970D.20000@a1poweruser.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jan 2013 02:30:02.0371 (UTC) FILETIME=[116A8D30:01CDE891] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 02:30:01 -0000 Fbsd8 wrote: > In a port I am working on I have a link for home -> /user/home > In the ports pkg-plist I can delete every thing but that darn link. > > Is there some statement along the line of > %%EXAMPLESDIR%%default/home/lab1/.profile > that will delete the @home link? > > sorry for the noise, figured it out. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 03:02:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FCB222 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 03:02:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from the.lists@mgm51.com) Received: from oneyou.mcmli.com (oneyou.mcmli.com [IPv6:2001:470:1d:8da::100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9542A8FC0C for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 03:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sentry.24cl.com (sentry.24cl.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:3fa::1]) by oneyou.mcmli.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3YbcVj0nmsz1DTn for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 22:02:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from BigBloat (bigbloat.24cl.home [10.20.1.4]) by sentry.24cl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D28130CC for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 22:02:04 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <201301012202040487.028FC6F3@sentry.24cl.com> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.09.1098 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (P) Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 22:02:04 -0500 From: "Mike." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: 9.1 won't install - GEOM/GRAID issues Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 03:02:07 -0000 My FreeBSD server had been running fine, no issues. This evening I tried to update it to 9.1. I don't "update in place", I update by wiping the prior version and letting the new version have its way with the disk. Well, 9.1 has issues with my system (dmesg is at the end of this message). When I boot from the install DVD, I see a lot of messages along the lines of ~Root mount waiting for GRAID~, then eventually that times out and I am allowed to select the Install option. However, when I get to the partitioning (btw, it's another issue, but the new set of screens to partition the drive really suck. I've never been so confused by a FreeBSD install. But I digress...) I eventually selected "auto" partitioning. Then I am greeted with a pop up that informs me that ada0 is not valid for some unmentioned reason. (did I mention that the new partitioning screens suck?). At this point I give up, and I am now in the process of re-installing 9.0. I'm not a long-time user of FreeBSD, I've only been using it since 2005, with installs to keep it up to date through the varied and sundry versions. But this is The First Time that a FreeBSD install has failed. What's goin' on? Here's the 9.0 dmesg I promised earlier (ada0 seems to be the drive that confuses the install): $ dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2012 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:15:25 UTC 2012 root@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz (2398.90-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf29 Family = f Model = 2 Stepping = 9 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0x4400 real memory = 536870912 (512 MB) avail memory = 505307136 (481 MB) Event timer "LAPIC" quality 400 ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 1 core(s) x 2 HTT threads cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP/HT): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed acpi0: reservation of 100000, 1fef0000 (3) failed Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 900 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 cpu1: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 agp0: on hostb0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 vgapci0: port 0xb000-0xb0ff mem 0xe0000000-0xe7ffffff,0xfd8f0000-0xfd8fffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 vgapci1: mem 0xd8000000-0xdfffffff,0xfd8e0000-0xfd8effff at device 0.1 on pci1 pcib2: at device 3.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 em0: port 0xcf80-0xcf9f mem 0xfd9e0000-0xfd9fffff irq 18 at device 1.0 on pci2 em0: Ethernet address: 00:11:2f:12:c9:96 uhci0: port 0xef00-0xef1f irq 16 at device 29.0 on pci0 usbus0: on uhci0 uhci1: port 0xef20-0xef3f irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 usbus1: on uhci1 uhci2: port 0xef40-0xef5f irq 18 at device 29.2 on pci0 usbus2: on uhci2 uhci3: port 0xef80-0xef9f irq 16 at device 29.3 on pci0 usbus3: on uhci3 ehci0: mem 0xfebffc00-0xfebfffff irq 23 at device 29.7 on pci0 usbus4: EHCI version 1.0 usbus4: on ehci0 pcib3: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 twe0: <3ware Storage Controller. Driver version 1.50.01.002> port 0xdf90-0xdf9f mem 0xfeafec00-0xfeafec0f,0xfe000000-0xfe7fffff irq 23 at device 11.0 on pci3 twe0: [GIANT-LOCKED] twe0: 4 ports, Firmware FE7X 1.05.00.036, BIOS BE7X 1.08.00.044 isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xfc00-0xfc0f at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 atapci1: port 0xefe0-0xefe7,0xefac-0xefaf,0xefa0-0xefa7,0xefa8-0xefab,0xef60-0xef6f irq 18 at device 31.2 on pci0 ata2: on atapci1 ata3: on atapci1 pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) pcm0: port 0xe800-0xe8ff,0xee80-0xeebf mem 0xfebff800-0xfebff9ff,0xfebff400-0xfebff4ff irq 17 at device 31.5 on pci0 pcm0: acpi_button0: on acpi0 attimer0: port 0x40-0x43 irq 0 on acpi0 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 Event timer "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 100 atrtc0: port 0x70-0x71 irq 8 on acpi0 Event timer "RTC" frequency 32768 Hz quality 0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xccfff,0xcd000-0xcdfff pnpid ORM0000 on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 ppc0: parallel port not found. p4tcc0: on cpu0 p4tcc1: on cpu1 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec twed0: on twe0 twed0: 953878MB (1953542144 sectors) usbus0: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus1: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus2: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus3: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus4: 480Mbps High Speed USB v2.0 ugen0.1: at usbus0 uhub0: on usbus0 ugen1.1: at usbus1 uhub1: on usbus1 ugen2.1: at usbus2 uhub2: on usbus2 ugen3.1: at usbus3 uhub3: on usbus3 ugen4.1: at usbus4 uhub4: on usbus4 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ada0 at ata2 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0 ada0: ATA-6 device ada0: 150.000MB/s transfers (SATA 1.x, UDMA5, PIO 8192bytes) ada0: 76319MB (156301488 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) ada0: Previously was known as ad4 ada1 at ata3 bus 0 scbus3 target 0 lun 0 ada1: ATA-8 SATA 1.x device ada1: 150.000MB/s transfers (SATA 1.x, UDMA5, PIO 8192bytes) ada1: 953869MB (1953525168 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) ada1: Previously was known as ad6 cd0 at ata1 bus 0 scbus1 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 33.300MB/s transfers (UDMA2, ATAPI 12bytes, PIO 65534bytes) cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present - tray closed SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! Root mount waiting for: usbus4 Root mount waiting for: usbus4 Root mount waiting for: usbus4 uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ada0p2 [rw]... em0: link state changed to UP $ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 05:45:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622EFBF5 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 05:45:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED51C8FC12 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 05:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r025KlVT044915 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 00:20:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id r025KlJ7044910 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 00:20:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 00:20:47 -0500 (EST) From: doug To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: pkg_add and 9.1 Release Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:20:47 -0500 (EST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: doug@safeport.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 05:45:12 -0000 Is this command being phased out? pkg_add -r uses a default environment of ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/ This path does not exist on ftp.freebsd.org. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 06:59:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E323560 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 06:59:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262A78FC12 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 06:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.6/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r026x6Xc057646 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 06:59:06 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk r026x6Xc057646 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/r026x6Xc057646; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Message-ID: <50E3DAB0.9020001@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 06:58:56 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: doug@safeport.com Subject: Re: pkg_add and 9.1 Release References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig85B8E32FA8C45225F1D0D1F2" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: doug , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 06:59:27 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig85B8E32FA8C45225F1D0D1F2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/01/2013 05:20, doug wrote: > Is this command being phased out? pkg_add -r uses a default environment= > of > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Late= st/ In fact, yes, pkg_add and the other pkg_tools commands are being phased out in favour of pkgng. However it is early days yet, and the problem you're seeing has nothing to do with that process. pkgng won't become the default in 9.x until the next release: until then the status quo ante persists. > This path does not exist on ftp.freebsd.org. Quite so. It's because of this: http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html As a consequence, large parts of the package building infrastructure are quarantined, pending reinstallation. Also there is a lot of work going into revising the software used to build the packages with security enhancements in mind. So there simply aren't packages available yet to go with 9.1-RELEASE. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig85B8E32FA8C45225F1D0D1F2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDj2rkACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzHsACfXGS416cgWvJkc7BXDXLKKOLY hzQAnjPNFvmDlJX2GKT1u0f2OdqAF6dJ =i7yz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig85B8E32FA8C45225F1D0D1F2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 07:58:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D90E1FD for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 07:58:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from oceanpt.safeport.com (oceanpt.safeport.com [65.122.17.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99698FC0A for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 07:58:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oceanpt.safeport.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r027wvtA088440 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 02:58:58 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 02:47:41 -0500 (EST) From: doug@safeport.com To: Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: pkg_add and 9.1 Release In-Reply-To: <50E3DAB0.9020001@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <50E3DAB0.9020001@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed ReSent-Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 02:58:49 -0500 (EST) ReSent-From: doug@safeport.com ReSent-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG ReSent-Subject: Re: pkg_add and 9.1 Release ReSent-Message-ID: ReSent-User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (oceanpt.safeport.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 02 Jan 2013 02:58:58 -0500 (EST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 07:58:59 -0000 On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 02/01/2013 05:20, doug wrote: >> Is this command being phased out? pkg_add -r uses a default environment >> of >> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/ > > In fact, yes, pkg_add and the other pkg_tools commands are being phased > out in favour of pkgng. However it is early days yet, and the problem > you're seeing has nothing to do with that process. pkgng won't become > the default in 9.x until the next release: until then the status quo > ante persists. > >> This path does not exist on ftp.freebsd.org. > > Quite so. It's because of this: > > http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html > > As a consequence, large parts of the package building infrastructure are > quarantined, pending reinstallation. Also there is a lot of work going > into revising the software used to build the packages with security > enhancements in mind. So there simply aren't packages available yet to > go with 9.1-RELEASE. Ah yes, thank you Matthew. I had forgotten about that. I guess the 9.1RC3 packages were removed for the same reason. _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-217-9220 Fax: 301-217-9277 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 08:00:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378323BF for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 08:00:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@aboutsupport.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f43.google.com (mail-ee0-f43.google.com [74.125.83.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B293C8FC17 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 08:00:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f43.google.com with SMTP id e49so6878053eek.16 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:00:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=Klv8CuCmfleALqXBmvbNGxBmkaSHNyi078Tf5QV6YO4=; b=kPpBvpi5osjhjBOgy+AhV8OHrsAYxzobNWub/csAnUjHgoDrRyHhp3/oz0DDJ0UOGD NB62HJZk3gsg0nv4oG5xwbsxAiu3BUL0CI5OXjIyWhilqdqfiSwoFxr0emW0Vzcm+kWb NI0UJVWQ4/fjkUwQEdEkS7aRBVUpi6nSzv5rBOnDpr6M+Bl0q40U8xgAnfnpFUM3UzMv 4HxGbyMpaOupP4sMpgQnjhC90oqF/o6kKvbRvm/hOvuuGu7iv7q840Ts38twImrsDUfd 1TUIHuIGHwfG6yEFAtS/Tre8P+Ke73sUTo5kvw8yM/yyE8K7SuUZ5q3WHQyPCV3r1HsJ bsTA== X-Received: by 10.14.209.193 with SMTP id s41mr123562064eeo.9.1357113640110; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:00:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.30.1.168] ([95.87.193.58]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm95877297eea.3.2013.01.02.00.00.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:00:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50E3E926.9010507@aboutsupport.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:00:38 +0200 From: "Zyumbilev, Peter" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: pkg_add and 9.1 Release References: <50E3DAB0.9020001@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <50E3DAB0.9020001@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlo5CTKewSmDDGDTxtKQjEAFT2ZAT4cOaTTf8onDJ/aDs1Awfu7NreT7d15YQoKAjLfMEq2 Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 08:00:47 -0000 >> This path does not exist on ftp.freebsd.org. > > Quite so. It's because of this: > > http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html > > As a consequence, large parts of the package building infrastructure are > quarantined, pending reinstallation. Also there is a lot of work going > into revising the software used to build the packages with security > enhancements in mind. So there simply aren't packages available yet to > go with 9.1-RELEASE. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > Hi Matthew, In this case for a new Nas4free machine, will you recommend to base it on 9.0 or 9.1 ? Thanks, Peter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 08:24:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B259B607 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 08:24:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFE38FC0C for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 08:24:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rufus.webfusion.com (mail.heartinternet.co.uk [79.170.40.31]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.6/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r028O386059003 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 08:24:12 GMT (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk r028O386059003 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/r028O386059003; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host mail.heartinternet.co.uk [79.170.40.31] claimed to be rufus.webfusion.com Message-ID: <50E3EEA2.1090906@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 08:24:02 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Zyumbilev, Peter" Subject: Re: pkg_add and 9.1 Release References: <50E3DAB0.9020001@FreeBSD.org> <50E3E926.9010507@aboutsupport.com> In-Reply-To: <50E3E926.9010507@aboutsupport.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 08:24:16 -0000 On 02/01/2013 08:00, Zyumbilev, Peter wrote: > In this case for a new Nas4free machine, will you recommend to base it > on 9.0 or 9.1 ? Either. Whichever one works best for you, and if you can't distinguish them on performance or bug-fixes, choose 9.1. However, don't fall into the trap of thinking 'because I'm running OS version 9.0 I have to use the binary packages for 9.0.' You don't. And in fact, if it's more than a month or so since the OS was released, you should be checking for updates. Unfortunately, since the security problem, there haven't been updates to package sets for *any* OS versions available. So your best recourse is to pull down a copy of the ports tree and build what packages you need for yourself. This is time consuming, but not particularly difficult. Cheers, Matthew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 08:32:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0689D6CE for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 08:32:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC65D8FC0A for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 08:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1TqJk0-002opm-BY>; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:32:00 +0100 Received: from e178007124.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.7.124] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1TqJk0-001h3Q-8J>; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:32:00 +0100 Message-ID: <50E3F07E.7000507@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:31:58 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD: GIT instaed of SVN? X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6218F9DBB181AB33DC5E8CAF" X-Originating-IP: 85.178.7.124 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 08:32:02 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6218F9DBB181AB33DC5E8CAF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable When it comes to keeping sources, most developer and most large dislocated and non-centralized projects prefer GIT over Subversion. FreeBSD has moved from the ancient CVS to Subversion not long ago and I was wondering why freeBSD would have done this, since Subversion lacks in so many aspects of a modern revision system. Well, I face several odds now since I need a kind of hot replication system that replicates my Subversion repositories and I feel uncomfortable with the way Subversion performs this. I decided to move forward to GIT which seems more appropriate in any aspect and while I do not have so much legacy to carry on with, I think for me pesonally the move is more logical. But what is with the FreeBSD project? Are there any attempts or intentions to bring GIT also to the sources (the base system, the ports)?= oh --------------enig6218F9DBB181AB33DC5E8CAF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ4/CAAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8lngIALARa2xm8bbfsTAZ2zATXF9J aqTqbfKfwJzDCHP5nWSihigOyR2SsCrRe9FABviR5sROOSkrAd6/K0uGbpAJCSvB lA45fF/L24rfPkIoPxEALjN+PFzfSJJt2YxGx0xH2ufb4B226aZLlze5CPQnO22M BGQTPdHkZtONQNt1rk4dAYrlQMN/Q4CBV3DgGLp8oWZSM5be9UHzsaIbYPhJdoNq ACdHAOmidBApWlX/Zay20lixcVLaPLBLp9AYmbr0b61QEPmx6u453ekWLHjc1RTU gwBMy59IacDSkO8VdozLwW9RTb1u2PbS8XBWfvXVa8GukGcVLNQ5CNI17J/f+rA= =nb85 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6218F9DBB181AB33DC5E8CAF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 10:40:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82DBD7A9 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 10:40:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberleo@cyberleo.net) Received: from paka.cyberleo.net (mtumishi.cyberleo.net [216.226.128.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491458FC14 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 10:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.44.4] (den.cyberleo.net [216.80.73.130]) by paka.cyberleo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 141C6120382; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 05:40:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <50E40E7F.7040601@cyberleo.net> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 04:39:59 -0600 From: CyberLeo Kitsana User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121201 Thunderbird/10.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "O. Hartmann" Subject: Re: FreeBSD: GIT instaed of SVN? References: <50E3F07E.7000507@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <50E3F07E.7000507@zedat.fu-berlin.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:40:07 -0000 On 01/02/2013 02:31 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: > When it comes to keeping sources, most developer and most large > dislocated and non-centralized projects prefer GIT over > Subversion. > > FreeBSD has moved from the ancient CVS to Subversion not long ago > and I was wondering why freeBSD would have done this, since > Subversion lacks in so many aspects of a modern revision system. > > Well, I face several odds now since I need a kind of hot > replication system that replicates my Subversion repositories and I > feel uncomfortable with the way Subversion performs this. I decided > to move forward to GIT which seems more appropriate in any aspect > and while I do not have so much legacy to carry on with, I think > for me pesonally the move is more logical. > > But what is with the FreeBSD project? Are there any attempts or > intentions to bring GIT also to the sources (the base system, the > ports)? http://wiki.freebsd.org/Git http://wiki.freebsd.org/GitDrawbacks Basically, the workflow practiced by the FreeBSD developers and release engineers would have to change completely, otherwise Git would fight them every step of the way. There are those of us who maintain Git mirrors of the project repos (with or without local patchsets), but they are in no way official. -- Fuzzy love, -CyberLeo Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 10:52:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA53B8DF for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 10:52:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F628FC14 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 10:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2153CA12; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:52:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r02AqRFd002042; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:52:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:52:27 +0100 From: Polytropon To: tak.official@gmail.com Subject: Re: ssh server hashcode change on nanoBSD Message-Id: <20130102115227.67242dd5.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20130101154021.322bef33.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:52:32 -0000 On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 18:59:05 +0330, takCoder wrote: > thank you for the details mentioned :) > > but now, a questions occurred to me about this ssh key. > as i don't know enough about its process, would you please tell me whether > this key is a shared key for all ssh clients who send a request? or it > differs as the client changes? The key received in the first step of a SSH session is the host key which identifies the host (in your case: the nanoBSD box). This key is stored in the SSH client's key database for reference because the key of a box typically does not change. If it changes - there should be a valid reason for it, or it might look like "there's something wrong here". As explained, this host key is generated when no key is found at startup. As soon as you make it permanent to your nanoBSD installation, the key will obviously stay the same, and the SSH client won't complain. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 11:38:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00863A0 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:38:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:2:6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE358FC0A for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp247-71.static.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([203.122.247.71]) by ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 02 Jan 2013 22:08:05 +1030 Message-ID: <50E41BF3.3080803@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:07:23 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-questions Subject: defines in system headers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 11:38:07 -0000 I ran into a problem with /usr/include/xlocale/_ctype.h in 9.1 Line 56 is - #if __GNUC__ && !__GNUC_STDC_INLINE__ but within a tinderbox on a 9.0 system (yes I know that setup isn't actually supported) using gcc as the compiler __GNUC_STDC_INLINE__ isn't defined and generates a "!" has no right operand error. Isn't the correct way to test that #if defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(__GNUC_STDC_INLINE__) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 13:35:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1341BDA for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 13:35:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from mail.feld.me (mail.feld.me [66.170.3.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 708B08FC15 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 13:35:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=eAaegVrInlykD+FSur11V79qqn2N+pFvceEmqW15DLM=; b=d/777NvOfVZBIfBg9VZ8C5DZHhQ/RtGPpWZnzfXplzNebI5bTjglmh/Rxb8WyGu9ta0I9bW0KUCRPN2TFRTNaIciU6XxEpX+VqgtxVeG/o547Rpuc2nzYiA0ASeP6fKX; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by mail.feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1TqOTv-0000Xy-0O; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 07:35:43 -0600 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1357133737-99390-99389/5/2; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 13:35:37 +0000 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 07:35:36 -0600 From: Mark Felder To: "O. Hartmann" Subject: Re: FreeBSD: GIT instaed of SVN? Message-Id: <20130102073536.3c4d4f29@tech304.office.supranet.net> In-Reply-To: <50E3F07E.7000507@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <50E3F07E.7000507@zedat.fu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SA-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, KHOP_THREADED=-0.5 X-SA-Score: -1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 13:35:51 -0000 Git is also not BSD licensed. I believe it may require bringing Python = into base as well. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 13:45:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AB9D88 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 13:45:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de (smtprelay06.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE138FC08 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 13:45:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [78.35.166.97] (helo=fabiankeil.de) by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (SSLv3:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1TqOY3-00027i-JT; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:39:59 +0100 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:38:53 +0100 From: Fabian Keil To: "Mike." Subject: Re: 9.1 won't install - GEOM/GRAID issues Message-ID: <20130102143853.754647c0@fabiankeil.de> In-Reply-To: <201301012202040487.028FC6F3@sentry.24cl.com> References: <201301012202040487.028FC6F3@sentry.24cl.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/l4SLtQOmcWDDWZ6HwpBuz9V"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Df-Sender: Nzc1MDY3 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 13:45:46 -0000 --Sig_/l4SLtQOmcWDDWZ6HwpBuz9V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Mike." wrote: > My FreeBSD server had been running fine, no issues. This evening I > tried to update it to 9.1. I don't "update in place", I update by > wiping the prior version and letting the new version have its way with > the disk. >=20 > Well, 9.1 has issues with my system (dmesg is at the end of this > message). >=20 > When I boot from the install DVD, I see a lot of messages along the > lines of ~Root mount waiting for GRAID~, then eventually that times out > and I am allowed to select the Install option. However, when I get to > the partitioning (btw, it's another issue, but the new set of screens > to partition the drive really suck. I've never been so confused by a > FreeBSD install. But I digress...) I eventually selected "auto" > partitioning. Then I am greeted with a pop up that informs me that > ada0 is not valid for some unmentioned reason. (did I mention that > the new partitioning screens suck?). >=20 > At this point I give up, and I am now in the process of re-installing > 9.0. >=20 > I'm not a long-time user of FreeBSD, I've only been using it since > 2005, with installs to keep it up to date through the varied and sundry > versions. But this is The First Time that a FreeBSD install has > failed. =20 >=20 > What's goin' on? =20 Probably there's corrupt raid metadata (or something that can be confused with raid metadata) on the disk(s). You could try booting with kern.geom.raid.enable set to 0 or without the module loaded. Sanitising the disk(s) should work as well. Fabian --Sig_/l4SLtQOmcWDDWZ6HwpBuz9V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlDkOHIACgkQBYqIVf93VJ3+ewCgmaIdbz7YZoKAu6eUKu3DNU9R ufwAn1FPkEshExZSkseUzfDeelQukMqE =MNe1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/l4SLtQOmcWDDWZ6HwpBuz9V-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 14:01:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703D2515 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:01:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211208FC0A for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TqOtJ-0003m8-51 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:01:57 +0100 Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.21.186.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:01:57 +0100 Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:01:57 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Walter Hurry Subject: Re: 9.1 on FTP Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <1ThA2d-00068H-PE@internal.tormail.org> <50C33EAB.8070505@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 30dc37b master) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:01:46 -0000 On Sat, 08 Dec 2012 13:20:43 +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Yes, 9.1-RELEASE is delayed. Some of that is due to the effects of the > security compromise, some is down to the release process not being > pushed through as efficiently as it might be. It is coming. Soon. After the announcement the other day I have upgraded a test box (using freebsd-update) from 9.1-RC3 to 9.1-RELEASE. Entirely smooth and painless. Congratulations and heartfelt thanks to all concerned. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 14:22:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B80CB70 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:22:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talayeh.asadi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ia0-f170.google.com (mail-ia0-f170.google.com [209.85.210.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FC48FC12 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:22:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f170.google.com with SMTP id i1so11909590iaa.15 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 06:22:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=yahIwQEyb7ZhrQz+6ahCkVOwDfPutUX3VC2CkZfUOlg=; b=lDM1pyicDp7M8npVRendTf8tQjF+N/+y75a+E9cknJ2qmLyyNxx+KourTd7D8jasE+ 93owmzdCkMOD3EnvjoLvaSRuwakI7kFQ53buJO8U4CLKqJSVc6eYseJQ7l0JVywvNErH jnmw77vFYfmiOFO74qDreaJIm2PqxUPSfmiq8pItJLAiLvKkd++eeBIWWVmfXy2+WCub JhHgXDl4B44d4kT9OB9K4xIV9JIZ0UENzoTHOWuarVHn3EiOGWeOUPX2YQ5E866TE28p lIMu6JVAVoxoUcaA5M0Povmg/9/zMaZ1EKKf8OqUUoqGWPCeMNlZwiu65WTBONc5JplY Mdfg== Received: by 10.50.195.135 with SMTP id ie7mr39036739igc.8.1357136567801; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 06:22:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: talayeh.asadi@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.161.130 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 06:22:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130102115227.67242dd5.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20130101154021.322bef33.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130102115227.67242dd5.freebsd@edvax.de> From: takCoder Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:52:27 +0330 X-Google-Sender-Auth: OcmjvRElGl_aGie32VZXdAr15SU Message-ID: Subject: Re: ssh server hashcode change on nanoBSD To: Polytropon , Lowell Gilbert Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: tak.official@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:22:49 -0000 On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >Don't top-post, please. Sorry for top-posting.. i'll try to keep an eye on it from now on :) well, cause i got my answer, let's have a conclusion: According to: On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >There are a number of keys involved in ssh. The host keys are used at >the start of the connection to make sure that some other machine doesn't >impersonate the one you wanted. and On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Polytropon wrote: >The key received in the first step of a SSH session is the >host key which identifies the host (in your case: the nanoBSD >box). This key is stored in the SSH client's key database for >reference because the key of a box typically does not change. .. >As explained, this host key is generated when no key is found >at startup. As soon as you make it permanent to your nanoBSD >installation, the key will obviously stay the same, and the >SSH client won't complain i made my ssh server key permanent on my nanoBSD server, by moving /etc/ssh/ files to /cfg/ssh files (i think those two files named dsa_key are enough, but in this test, i copied all files in the source dir..) and now there are no compliments from any clients, thanks to Polytropon and Lowell and Aldis. :) >Cryptography in general is quite complicated, and ssh is a lot more >complicated than just its cryptography. and also thank you all for your patience and good explanations :) Best Regards, t.a.k From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 14:37:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03060E56 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:37:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ajith.comp@zoho.com) Received: from sender1.zohomail.com (sender1.zohomail.com [72.5.230.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73198FC0A for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:37:35 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=zapps768; d=zoho.com; h=date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; b=hHuc7PdBUdjTAO/m/5xO2gBlE1nk7swzq9GWobRpRWauNfdcp0FUJTPUGOUWINi/Ie44UAeHl+FD v4J+Gl5jOBUNObEFoCvTx6tkgQ+CbtLSpcLfBpqKbX5b1Q+NZCjQ Received: from mail.zoho.com by mx.zohomail.com with SMTP id 13571343533851014.5216886827596; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 05:45:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from [117.206.13.205] by mail.zoho.com with HTTP;Wed, 2 Jan 2013 05:45:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 05:45:53 -0800 From: "ajith.comp" To: Message-ID: <13bfb82d3b6.-716264837714092920.-4009816568014699529@zoho.com> Subject: Could not access root and user account after installing xorg-minimal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: MEDIUM User-Agent: Zoho Mail X-Mailer: Zoho Mail Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:37:36 -0000 I am running FreeBSD-9 After installing xorg-minimal by #pkg_add -r xorg-minimal and installing fonts by #cd /usr/port/x11-fonts/urwfonts #make install clean I installed Irsis. The problem occured after I issued the #startx , an error message appeared for a very short time.I could not read it.But think it was reading monitor. Now I can not access any account.wrong password message appears after typing the password. Thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 14:42:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28E2FBF; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:42:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFFFE8FC08; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 06:42:12 -0800 Message-ID: <50E44742.2060009@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:42:10 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: pkg_add and 9.1 Release References: <50E3DAB0.9020001@FreeBSD.org> <50E3E926.9010507@aboutsupport.com> <50E3EEA2.1090906@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <50E3EEA2.1090906@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jan 2013 14:42:12.0898 (UTC) FILETIME=[5A0D0020:01CDE8F7] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: "Zyumbilev, Peter" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:42:12 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 02/01/2013 08:00, Zyumbilev, Peter wrote: >> In this case for a new Nas4free machine, will you recommend to base it >> on 9.0 or 9.1 ? > > Either. Whichever one works best for you, and if you can't distinguish > them on performance or bug-fixes, choose 9.1. > > However, don't fall into the trap of thinking 'because I'm running OS > version 9.0 I have to use the binary packages for 9.0.' You don't. And > in fact, if it's more than a month or so since the OS was released, you > should be checking for updates. > > Unfortunately, since the security problem, there haven't been updates to > package sets for *any* OS versions available. So your best recourse is > to pull down a copy of the ports tree and build what packages you need > for yourself. This is time consuming, but not particularly difficult. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > what is the status of ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-current/Latest/ which is on the ftp servers? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 15:14:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB335BC for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:14:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B528FC13 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:14:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 07:14:20 -0800 Message-ID: <50E44EC9.6070301@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:14:17 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: is csup broken? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jan 2013 15:14:20.0227 (UTC) FILETIME=[D6D41130:01CDE8FB] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:14:19 -0000 Been using same script for years to fetch selected port files. Today I get error message Unknown collection "ports-sysutils" Running 9.1 and this worked in 2012 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 15:20:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD24701 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:20:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A868FC0A for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4148241EC; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:20:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r02FKPKW002827; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:20:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:20:25 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: is csup broken? Message-Id: <20130102162025.d7ef8fd5.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <50E44EC9.6070301@a1poweruser.com> References: <50E44EC9.6070301@a1poweruser.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:20:30 -0000 On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:14:17 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > Been using same script for years to fetch selected port files. > Today I get error message > Unknown collection "ports-sysutils" > > Running 9.1 and this worked in 2012 Maybe this is related to the removal of CVS-related services for obtaining src and ports? Have you tried checking out via SVN which now is the desired default method (even though it's not integrated in the base install and the "make" scripting mechanism)? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 15:30:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92ADBB0A for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:30:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@chthonixia.net) Received: from www5.pairlite.com (www5.pairlite.com [64.130.10.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672EA8FC08 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:30:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whisperer.chthonixia.net (unknown [184.152.30.105]) by www5.pairlite.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A40592E304 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 10:30:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 10:31:06 -0500 From: Joe Altman To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is csup broken? Message-ID: <20130102153106.GA86408@whisperer.chthonixia.net> References: <50E44EC9.6070301@a1poweruser.com> <20130102162025.d7ef8fd5.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130102162025.d7ef8fd5.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:30:27 -0000 On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 04:20:25PM +0100, Polytropon wrote: > > Have you tried checking out via SVN which now is the desired > default method (even though it's not integrated in the base > install and the "make" scripting mechanism)? ISTM that SVN is not the default method for users; but portsnap is the preferred method for users. Developers, OTOH, may find SVN useful. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-upgrading-portsnap.html I have no idea if the OP is a user or a developer; but I do know that at least a cursory reading of the Handbook is a good idea, since the OP question seems to be directly addressed in the Handbook. Regards, Joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 15:34:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A681BEC for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:34:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dyioulos@onpointfc.com) Received: from mail2.onpointfc.com (mail2.firstbhph.com [65.105.102.163]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71528FC15 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:34:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail2.onpointfc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Email Security Appliance) with SMTP id 6FE973318312_E452CAB for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:31:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from plymouth.onpointfc.com (plymouth.onpointfc.com [192.168.1.2]) by mail2.onpointfc.com (Sophos Email Appliance) with ESMTP id 2054E33181C6_E452CAF for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:31:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mepis1.headquarters.firstbhph.com (mepis1.onpointfc.com [192.168.100.52]) by plymouth.onpointfc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r02FUoKF004059 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 10:30:55 -0500 From: Dimitri Yioulos To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is csup broken? Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 10:30:48 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <50E44EC9.6070301@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <50E44EC9.6070301@a1poweruser.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201301021030.49852.dyioulos@onpointfc.com> X-Synonym: Copied by Synonym (http://www.modulo.ro/synonym) to: archive@onpointfc.com X-First1-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Onpoint Financial Corporation for more information X-First1-MailScanner-ID: r02FUoKF004059 X-First1-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-First1-MailScanner-MCPCheck: MCP-Clean, MCP-Checker (score=0, required 1) X-MailScanner-From: dyioulos@onpointfc.com X-MailScanner-To: archive@onpointfc.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-First1-MailScanner-Watermark: 1357745456.49574@IHkOp2nX1NfuRlXBtPRDyg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:34:51 -0000 On Wednesday 02 January 2013 10:14:17 am Fbsd8 wrote: > Been using same script for years to fetch selected port > files. Today I get error message > Unknown collection "ports-sysutils" > > Running 9.1 and this worked in 2012 > It must have to do with the security incident that took place a couple of months ago. It affects all package updates for 9.1 via pkg_add and csup, I guess. Dimitri -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 15:34:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2FFBF1 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:34:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 503BA8FC08 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 07:34:57 -0800 Message-ID: <50E4539E.7050803@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:34:54 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon Subject: Re: is csup broken? References: <50E44EC9.6070301@a1poweruser.com> <20130102162025.d7ef8fd5.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20130102162025.d7ef8fd5.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jan 2013 15:34:57.0841 (UTC) FILETIME=[B880FA10:01CDE8FE] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:34:56 -0000 Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:14:17 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: >> Been using same script for years to fetch selected port files. >> Today I get error message >> Unknown collection "ports-sysutils" >> >> Running 9.1 and this worked in 2012 > > Maybe this is related to the removal of CVS-related services > for obtaining src and ports? > > Have you tried checking out via SVN which now is the desired > default method (even though it's not integrated in the base > install and the "make" scripting mechanism)? > > > This is a catch 22 problem. How can I use svn when it's not part of the 9.1 base release? Have to csup it down first and csup is broken. Really between a rock and a hard place. What the heck are the Freebsd officials doing? They really mucked up 9.1 release big time. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 15:35:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7A8D1C for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:35:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from the.lists@mgm51.com) Received: from oneyou.mcmli.com (oneyou.mcmli.com [IPv6:2001:470:1d:8da::100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC178FC14 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sentry.24cl.com (sentry.24cl.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:3fa::1]) by oneyou.mcmli.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3YbxCl5Qtzz1DVl for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 10:35:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from BigBloat (bigbloat.24cl.home [10.20.1.4]) by sentry.24cl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDDC5130CC for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 10:35:14 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <201301021035130285.00194F38@sentry.24cl.com> In-Reply-To: <20130102143853.754647c0@fabiankeil.de> References: <201301012202040487.028FC6F3@sentry.24cl.com> <20130102143853.754647c0@fabiankeil.de> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.09.1098 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (P) Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:35:13 -0500 From: "Mike." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9.1 won't install - GEOM/GRAID issues Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:35:16 -0000 On 1/2/2013 at 2:38 PM Fabian Keil wrote: |"Mike." wrote: | |> My FreeBSD server had been running fine, no issues. This evening I |> tried to update it to 9.1. I don't "update in place", I update by |> wiping the prior version and letting the new version have its way with |> the disk. |> |> Well, 9.1 has issues with my system (dmesg is at the end of this |> message). |> |> When I boot from the install DVD, I see a lot of messages along the |> lines of ~Root mount waiting for GRAID~, then eventually that times out |> and I am allowed to select the Install option. However, when I get to |> the partitioning (btw, it's another issue, but the new set of screens |> to partition the drive really suck. I've never been so confused by a |> FreeBSD install. But I digress...) I eventually selected "auto" |> partitioning. Then I am greeted with a pop up that informs me that |> ada0 is not valid for some unmentioned reason. (did I mention that |> the new partitioning screens suck?). |> |> At this point I give up, and I am now in the process of re-installing |> 9.0. |> |> I'm not a long-time user of FreeBSD, I've only been using it since |> 2005, with installs to keep it up to date through the varied and sundry |> versions. But this is The First Time that a FreeBSD install has |> failed. |> |> What's goin' on? | |Probably there's corrupt raid metadata (or something that can be |confused with raid metadata) on the disk(s). | |You could try booting with kern.geom.raid.enable set to 0 or |without the module loaded. Sanitising the disk(s) should work |as well. | |Fabian ============= Thanks for the reply. The disk in question has never been used for RAID, so if there is RAID metadata on the disk, I do not know how it got there. The disk is (I believe --- it's been a while since I have been inside that box) on a Promise SATA RAID controller, but RAID is not used and has never been used (I have a 3Ware controller for RAID on that box). When things settle down, I'll try to figure out how to sanitize the disk and try to install 9.1 again. Thanks again for your quick reply. Mike. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 15:43:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59275E4F for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:43:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C95C8FC0A for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:43:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 07:43:52 -0800 Message-ID: <50E455B5.1050708@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:43:49 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Altman Subject: Re: is csup broken? References: <50E44EC9.6070301@a1poweruser.com> <20130102162025.d7ef8fd5.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130102153106.GA86408@whisperer.chthonixia.net> In-Reply-To: <20130102153106.GA86408@whisperer.chthonixia.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jan 2013 15:43:52.0504 (UTC) FILETIME=[F7301380:01CDE8FF] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:43:51 -0000 Joe Altman wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 04:20:25PM +0100, Polytropon wrote: >> Have you tried checking out via SVN which now is the desired >> default method (even though it's not integrated in the base >> install and the "make" scripting mechanism)? > > ISTM that SVN is not the default method for users; but portsnap is the > preferred method for users. > > Developers, OTOH, may find SVN useful. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.html > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-upgrading-portsnap.html > > I have no idea if the OP is a user or a developer; but I do know that at > least a cursory reading of the Handbook is a good idea, since the OP > question seems to be directly addressed in the Handbook. > > Regards, > > Joe As the OP I see no need to pollute my system with a complete ports tree when I only have to compile php5 to enable the apache module. Thats over kill in my book. Sure the handbook says to use portsnap but that still loads the complete ports tree. crazy. My ports tree only has the ports I have to recompile to change defaults used in package. This approach saves disk and backup times. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 15:47:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64465F09 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:47:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9D78FC0C for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:47:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDC623F0B; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:47:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r02FlSQd002966; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:47:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:47:28 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: is csup broken? Message-Id: <20130102164728.abc6cc34.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <50E4539E.7050803@a1poweruser.com> References: <50E44EC9.6070301@a1poweruser.com> <20130102162025.d7ef8fd5.freebsd@edvax.de> <50E4539E.7050803@a1poweruser.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:47:27 -0000 On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:34:54 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > Polytropon wrote: > > On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:14:17 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > >> Been using same script for years to fetch selected port files. > >> Today I get error message > >> Unknown collection "ports-sysutils" > >> > >> Running 9.1 and this worked in 2012 > > > > Maybe this is related to the removal of CVS-related services > > for obtaining src and ports? > > > > Have you tried checking out via SVN which now is the desired > > default method (even though it's not integrated in the base > > install and the "make" scripting mechanism)? > > > > > > > > This is a catch 22 problem. > > How can I use svn when it's not part of the 9.1 base release? > Have to csup it down first and csup is broken. You actually don't _have_ to use CSV. You can install SVN from binary packages via the new "pkg" command (pkgng instead of traditional pkg_* tools). Or you can obtain a ports tree first with portsnap or from the installation media you've been using, install svn from this, and then continue using svn to obtain updates for ports (and src, if you want). However, you're right about the fact that svn isn't part of the base installation (yet?) and it doesn't fully integrate with what worked with CVS for many years. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 15:47:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E03F9B for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:47:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B818FC13 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:47:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 07:47:39 -0800 Message-ID: <50E45698.8010000@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:47:36 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dimitri Yioulos Subject: Re: is csup broken? References: <50E44EC9.6070301@a1poweruser.com> <201301021030.49852.dyioulos@onpointfc.com> In-Reply-To: <201301021030.49852.dyioulos@onpointfc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jan 2013 15:47:39.0464 (UTC) FILETIME=[7E776C80:01CDE900] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:47:38 -0000 Dimitri Yioulos wrote: > On Wednesday 02 January 2013 10:14:17 am Fbsd8 wrote: >> Been using same script for years to fetch selected port >> files. Today I get error message >> Unknown collection "ports-sysutils" >> >> Running 9.1 and this worked in 2012 >> > > It must have to do with the security incident that took > place a couple of months ago. It affects all package > updates for 9.1 via pkg_add and csup, I guess. > > Dimitri > I am not talking about packages here. subject says is csup broken? I use csup to fetch individual ports not packages. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 16:03:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21E838B; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:03:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D721E157D; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r02G33K6082556; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 03:03:04 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 03:03:03 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg_add and 9.1 Release In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20130103021123.Y30575@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: doug@safeport.com, Matthew Seaman X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:03:14 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 448, Issue 3, Message: 24 - please pardon the loss of threading - On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 02:47:41 -0500 (EST) doug@safeport.com wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > On 02/01/2013 05:20, doug wrote: > >> Is this command being phased out? pkg_add -r uses a default environment > >> of > >> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/ > > > > In fact, yes, pkg_add and the other pkg_tools commands are being phased > > out in favour of pkgng. However it is early days yet, and the problem > > you're seeing has nothing to do with that process. pkgng won't become > > the default in 9.x until the next release: until then the status quo > > ante persists. Looking forward to using pkgng on my next 9.1 laptop, thanks Matthew. > >> This path does not exist on ftp.freebsd.org. > > > > Quite so. It's because of this: > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html > > > > As a consequence, large parts of the package building infrastructure are > > quarantined, pending reinstallation. Also there is a lot of work going > > into revising the software used to build the packages with security > > enhancements in mind. So there simply aren't packages available yet to > > go with 9.1-RELEASE. > > Ah yes, thank you Matthew. I had forgotten about that. I guess the 9.1RC3 > packages were removed for the same reason. ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9-stable/Latest/ is still there, though. I ran into this from the installed 9.1-RELEASE /etc/motd's suggestion of adding Handbook, FAQ etc by using pkg_add -r en-freebsd-doc. I browsed to ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9-stable/docs/en-freebsd-doc-39278,1.tbz dated October, and figured that should do for now :) I could have set PACKAGESITE but it was as easy to fetch(1) that file then pkg_add it. If I were going to install say X + KDE on that laptop - which I'm not - I'd merrily use what was fresh in October and upgrade as packages become available again, and build anything needing 'more freshness' from ports. cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 16:08:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6BAF534 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:08:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CBE715A0 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:08:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 08:08:27 -0800 Message-ID: <50E45B78.5040609@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 11:08:24 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon Subject: Re: is csup broken? References: <50E44EC9.6070301@a1poweruser.com> <20130102162025.d7ef8fd5.freebsd@edvax.de> <50E4539E.7050803@a1poweruser.com> <20130102164728.abc6cc34.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20130102164728.abc6cc34.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jan 2013 16:08:28.0119 (UTC) FILETIME=[66B90E70:01CDE903] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:08:28 -0000 Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:34:54 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: >> Polytropon wrote: >>> On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:14:17 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: >>>> Been using same script for years to fetch selected port files. >>>> Today I get error message >>>> Unknown collection "ports-sysutils" >>>> >>>> Running 9.1 and this worked in 2012 >>> Maybe this is related to the removal of CVS-related services >>> for obtaining src and ports? >>> >>> Have you tried checking out via SVN which now is the desired >>> default method (even though it's not integrated in the base >>> install and the "make" scripting mechanism)? >>> >>> >>> >> This is a catch 22 problem. >> >> How can I use svn when it's not part of the 9.1 base release? >> Have to csup it down first and csup is broken. > > You actually don't _have_ to use CSV. > > You can install SVN from binary packages via the new "pkg" command > (pkgng instead of traditional pkg_* tools). > > Or you can obtain a ports tree first with portsnap or from the > installation media you've been using, install svn from this, > and then continue using svn to obtain updates for ports (and > src, if you want). > > However, you're right about the fact that svn isn't part of the > base installation (yet?) and it doesn't fully integrate with > what worked with CVS for many years. > > > Still behind the 8 ball. The new "pkg" is not part of the base in 9.1 and there is no ftp packages for 9.1 and the disc1.iso media I installed from has no packages. I'm fubarbed Now I just had a port I maintain committed yesterday and I have no way to test it to verify the port is working. And doing a portsnap which may not contain my updated port for a few days if ever until all the other problem are addressed. This 9.1 release was released prematurely. It has more problems them 5.0 had which had a re-release 2 weeks later to fix problems. This is BAD public relations for FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 16:21:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E3B879 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:21:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1411F1606 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:21:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C333CAD0; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:21:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r02GLbsq003074; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:21:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:21:37 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: is csup broken? Message-Id: <20130102172137.3e26a4df.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <50E45B78.5040609@a1poweruser.com> References: <50E44EC9.6070301@a1poweruser.com> <20130102162025.d7ef8fd5.freebsd@edvax.de> <50E4539E.7050803@a1poweruser.com> <20130102164728.abc6cc34.freebsd@edvax.de> <50E45B78.5040609@a1poweruser.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:21:37 -0000 On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 11:08:24 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > Polytropon wrote: > > On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:34:54 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > >> Polytropon wrote: > >>> On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:14:17 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > >>>> Been using same script for years to fetch selected port files. > >>>> Today I get error message > >>>> Unknown collection "ports-sysutils" > >>>> > >>>> Running 9.1 and this worked in 2012 > >>> Maybe this is related to the removal of CVS-related services > >>> for obtaining src and ports? > >>> > >>> Have you tried checking out via SVN which now is the desired > >>> default method (even though it's not integrated in the base > >>> install and the "make" scripting mechanism)? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> This is a catch 22 problem. > >> > >> How can I use svn when it's not part of the 9.1 base release? > >> Have to csup it down first and csup is broken. > > > > You actually don't _have_ to use CSV. > > > > You can install SVN from binary packages via the new "pkg" command > > (pkgng instead of traditional pkg_* tools). > > > > Or you can obtain a ports tree first with portsnap or from the > > installation media you've been using, install svn from this, > > and then continue using svn to obtain updates for ports (and > > src, if you want). > > > > However, you're right about the fact that svn isn't part of the > > base installation (yet?) and it doesn't fully integrate with > > what worked with CVS for many years. > > > > > > > > Still behind the 8 ball. > > The new "pkg" is not part of the base in 9.1 > and there is no ftp packages for 9.1 and the > disc1.iso media I installed from has no packages. > > I'm fubarbed There is an option, even thogh possibly considered unelegant in your situation: Install the ports tree from the installation media and then install the svn port from that "outdated" ports tree. Afterwards delete the ports tree and use svn to get the components you need. > Now I just had a port I maintain committed yesterday > and I have no way to test it to verify the port is working. > > And doing a portsnap which may not contain my updated port > for a few days if ever until all the other problem are addressed. That's true - SVN (formerly CVS) provided you with "ad hoc" changes to the ports tree, whereas portsnap provides a snapshot that might not be enough "up to date". I'd really like to see a svn command being part of the base installation, with integration into the comfortable "make update" mechanism for ports and system sources so it can _really and actually_ replace csup. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 16:40:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB958CD2 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:40:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mx1.bjare.net (mx1.bjare.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2EE16A1 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:40:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8955E31C for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:29:45 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx1.bjare.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.993 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.993 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.090, BAYES_00=-2.599, RDNS_NONE=0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.596] Received: from mx1.bjare.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.bjare.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id xGr+67lOdix3 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:29:43 +0100 (CET) X-BN-MX1: ja X-BN-MailInfo: BjareNet Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (unknown [195.216.53.111]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5815E4CF for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:29:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50E46078.9010407@eskk.nu> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:29:44 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Trying to find out how to mount as user Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:40:06 -0000 Hello. I want to write a script, where I as a normal user, can back up my files with rsync to another machine (pc01), which shares a directory via NFS. I have an entry in the local machines /etc/fstab pc01:/backup /mnt/backup nfs rw,noauto 0 0 The command: mount /mnt/backup works as root. If I do sudo mount /mnt/backup I get [tcp] pc01:/backup: Permission denied I'm a member of the local wheel group and at the remote machine as well(pc01) pc01:/backup has drwxrwxr-x 28 root wheel 1024 1 Jan 14:44 backup/ The local mount point /mnt/backup has drwxr-xr-x 5 root wheel 512 1 Jan 17:18 mnt/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 1 Jan 11:38 backup/ I've tried to ad write permissions to the group, but it did not help me. I understand that I have a permission problem but I can't figure it out. Help Please! Thanks /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 16:44:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D66FF70 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:44:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB7D16E2 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TqQsP-00084W-OA for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:09:09 +0100 Received: from pool-173-79-84-117.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.84.117]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:09:09 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-84-117.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:09:09 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Subject: Re: 9.1 won't install - GEOM/GRAID issues Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 11:08:44 -0500 Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: <201301012202040487.028FC6F3@sentry.24cl.com> <20130102143853.754647c0@fabiankeil.de> <201301021035130285.00194F38@sentry.24cl.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-84-117.washdc.fios.verizon.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:44:12 -0000 Mike. wrote: [snip] > > Thanks for the reply. The disk in question has never been used for > RAID, so if there is RAID metadata on the disk, I do not know how it > got there. The disk is (I believe --- it's been a while since I have > been inside that box) on a Promise SATA RAID controller, but RAID is > not used and has never been used (I have a 3Ware controller for RAID on > that box). > > When things settle down, I'll try to figure out how to sanitize the > disk and try to install 9.1 again. > If somehow some RAID controller ever wrote out metadata to the disk it will be the last sector or two at the very end. Sometimes some GPT partitioning schemes corrupt this too. If some alien form of GPT partitioning or some form of RAID has written anything to this area it will throw an error when GEOM 'tastes' the disk. You can zero both these areas with dd if=/dev/zero plus disk plus some arithmetic. Another way, and I do sometimes when I go to reuse a disk that's been used for a while, is to use the mfr's diagnostic utility. I know the WD diag utility has an option to write 0's to the entire drive. Sometimes I do this and then run the extended diags just to get a 'feel good' factor on the media. Trouble with this is the larger the disk gets the longer it takes. I just like media scans on old disks before I recycle them to a new project. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 16:47:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B46AB6 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:47:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mx1.bjare.net (mx1.bjare.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15631705 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFA45E164 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:47:16 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx1.bjare.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.993 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.993 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.090, BAYES_00=-2.599, RDNS_NONE=0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.596] Received: from mx1.bjare.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.bjare.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id EwP5ixB9dme2 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:47:15 +0100 (CET) X-BN-MX1: ja X-BN-MailInfo: BjareNet Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (unknown [195.216.53.111]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138EB5E330 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:47:15 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50E46493.5020306@eskk.nu> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:47:15 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: SOLVED...Re: Trying to find out how to mount as user References: <50E46078.9010407@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: <50E46078.9010407@eskk.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:47:19 -0000 2013-01-02 17:29, Leslie Jensen skrev: > Hello. > > I want to write a script, where I as a normal user, can back up my files > with rsync to another machine (pc01), which shares a directory via NFS. > > I have an entry in the local machines /etc/fstab > > pc01:/backup /mnt/backup nfs rw,noauto 0 0 > > > The command: > mount /mnt/backup works as root. > > If I do sudo mount /mnt/backup I get > [tcp] pc01:/backup: Permission denied > > I'm a member of the local wheel group and at the remote machine as > well(pc01) > > pc01:/backup has > drwxrwxr-x 28 root wheel 1024 1 Jan 14:44 backup/ > > > The local mount point /mnt/backup has > drwxr-xr-x 5 root wheel 512 1 Jan 17:18 mnt/ > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 1 Jan 11:38 backup/ > > I've tried to ad write permissions to the group, but it did not help me. > > I understand that I have a permission problem but I can't figure it out. > > Help Please! > > Thanks > > /Leslie > > I was on a wired connection first and the on wifi so I had two different IP-addresses! New question: Instead of having the following in my /etc/exports /backup machine01 machine02 Can I put my internal network as 192.168.0/24? /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 16:59:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3369563F for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:59:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jnagyjr1978@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f177.google.com (mail-qc0-f177.google.com [209.85.216.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA5317B3 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:59:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id u28so7338597qcs.8 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 08:59:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=r1m2D6YMsaIm/QgJ4P47c4kph/Mtkq/cDaUazmGlGdY=; b=BfyIxhG5ME1wctos2dc33L910eIHV5mfxfdiTYL1BkP0hcej2msyCgq41BNz6qKuhJ +lOYxMc4K8y88zJlmef0SFBi1z3MZbRh3Th4rpZmUl2c7QxsPjWwnZORp323bK4u0b7Z XyjUF4droydSwv2yLiDSrmjd/sUWhiyF9itc2tLlhCmMQRBPpyNWYizpVE3clrmmKbM4 N3zw44EB+ga0FV8StWJbnc2Pn1MJeLuJg1I+93YpPk6wKOAH1jHf03DUvV5fRIiwfcBY 1R92aNDjyERzgNNCRpuJ7zILesUULqpBg6IOf8/18Zi22UNOfCACA8nrjJokG5Lnos9h wJTQ== X-Received: by 10.224.86.206 with SMTP id t14mr24613689qal.90.1357145627132; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 08:53:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (vid-196.dhcp.grp10.tnmmrl.infoave.net. [204.116.254.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i9sm8062135qei.10.2013.01.02.08.53.45 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Jan 2013 08:53:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50E46617.7070405@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:53:43 -0600 From: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is csup broken? References: <50E44EC9.6070301@a1poweruser.com> <20130102162025.d7ef8fd5.freebsd@edvax.de> <50E4539E.7050803@a1poweruser.com> <20130102164728.abc6cc34.freebsd@edvax.de> <50E45B78.5040609@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <50E45B78.5040609@a1poweruser.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:59:25 -0000 On 01/02/13 10:08, Fbsd8 wrote: > Still behind the 8 ball. No, I'm sorry but that's you. > The new "pkg" is not part of the base in 9.1 > and there is no ftp packages for 9.1 and the > disc1.iso media I installed from has no packages. I don't know what crap you're talking, but if you would have installed the ports tree upon installation this wouldn't be an issue. Yes, you want to save space and cut down on back-up times, awesome goals, but you should have been following on the list and in the handbook where CVS has been deprecated (whether for good or bad, it's done) and portsnap/SVN are now the preferred methods. > I'm fubarbed No, just too lazy to pull off a few extra steps for a one-off with portsnap or svn (which you will have to compile yourself, I'm afraid, though maybe someone will make a package for ya) > Now I just had a port I maintain committed yesterday > and I have no way to test it to verify the port is working. And? Pull it in with svn. I use svn to keep tabs on tk85 (and I only pull in tk85) in my user folder and I use svn to update my ports tree nightly. > And doing a portsnap which may not contain my updated port > for a few days if ever until all the other problem are addressed. portsnap shouldn't be affected by the pkgbeta site being down, someone else with more knowledge on the subject should feel free to correct me. > This 9.1 release was released prematurely. It has more problems > them 5.0 had which had a re-release 2 weeks later to fix problems. Prematurely? Depending on what source you go to it's at least two months behind. > This is BAD public relations for FreeBSD. Now there is some FUD for ya. -- Yours in Christ, Joseph A Nagy Jr "Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1 Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL http://owl.apotheon.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 17:11:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A6F1110 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:11:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6532517ED for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:11:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 09:11:06 -0800 Message-ID: <50E46A27.9000202@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:11:03 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nightrecon@hotmail.com Subject: Re: 9.1 won't install - GEOM/GRAID issues References: <201301012202040487.028FC6F3@sentry.24cl.com> <20130102143853.754647c0@fabiankeil.de> <201301021035130285.00194F38@sentry.24cl.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jan 2013 17:11:06.0912 (UTC) FILETIME=[27235A00:01CDE90C] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:11:06 -0000 Michael Powell wrote: > Mike. wrote: > [snip] >> Thanks for the reply. The disk in question has never been used for >> RAID, so if there is RAID metadata on the disk, I do not know how it >> got there. The disk is (I believe --- it's been a while since I have >> been inside that box) on a Promise SATA RAID controller, but RAID is >> not used and has never been used (I have a 3Ware controller for RAID on >> that box). >> >> When things settle down, I'll try to figure out how to sanitize the >> disk and try to install 9.1 again. >> > > If somehow some RAID controller ever wrote out metadata to the disk it will > be the last sector or two at the very end. Sometimes some GPT partitioning > schemes corrupt this too. If some alien form of GPT partitioning or some > form of RAID has written anything to this area it will throw an error when > GEOM 'tastes' the disk. > > You can zero both these areas with dd if=/dev/zero plus disk plus some > arithmetic. Another way, and I do sometimes when I go to reuse a disk that's > been used for a while, is to use the mfr's diagnostic utility. I know the WD > diag utility has an option to write 0's to the entire drive. Sometimes I do > this and then run the extended diags just to get a 'feel good' factor on the > media. Trouble with this is the larger the disk gets the longer it takes. I > just like media scans on old disks before I recycle them to a new project. > > -Mike > > Here is a little script named gpart.nuke that may help you #! /bin/sh echo "What disk do you want" echo "to wipe? For example - da1 :" read disk echo "OK, in 10 seconds I will destroy all data on $disk!" echo "Press CTRL+C to abort!" sleep 10 diskinfo ${disk} | while read disk sectorsize size sectors other do # Delete MBR and partition table. dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/${disk} bs=${sectorsize} count=1 # Delete GEOM metadata. dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/${disk} bs=${sectorsize} oseek=`expr $sectors - 2` count=2 done From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 17:27:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F871C0C for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:27:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607351854 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 09:27:46 -0800 Message-ID: <50E46E0D.5030202@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:27:41 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD questions Subject: using /etc/portsnap.conf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jan 2013 17:27:46.0650 (UTC) FILETIME=[7B0743A0:01CDE90E] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:27:45 -0000 When issuing the portsnap command will it automatically read the /etc/portsnap.conf file or is the -f option mandatory? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 17:38:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB0B2114 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:38:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C1D1888 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:38:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.6/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r02Hbh98067414 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:37:43 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk r02Hbh98067414 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/r02Hbh98067414; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Message-ID: <50E47060.2040601@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:37:36 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: pkg_add and 9.1 Release References: <50E3DAB0.9020001@FreeBSD.org> <50E3E926.9010507@aboutsupport.com> <50E3EEA2.1090906@freebsd.org> <50E44742.2060009@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <50E44742.2060009@a1poweruser.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB40D9DF0A98FC5E0BAA7B599" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: "Zyumbilev, Peter" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:38:01 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB40D9DF0A98FC5E0BAA7B599 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/01/2013 14:42, Fbsd8 wrote: > what is the status of > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-current/Latest/ > which is on the ftp servers? The latest packages there are what was compiled before the security incident. It hasn't been updated since. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enigB40D9DF0A98FC5E0BAA7B599 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDkcGYACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyo3gCeIKpd3acF3lcLUI1m5O1/xHlc D7YAoJB9oXawMIfTlMZIcg9pLKISbGi3 =2Jj5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB40D9DF0A98FC5E0BAA7B599-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 17:38:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7639A2233 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:38:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from mail.feld.me (mail.feld.me [66.170.3.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425A4188A for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:38:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=pBmYOMjuwzZANRS84CgfTXHHdIwkNz0VMPrHKrlOOV4=; b=KwNvI8FimPrjrDvF3BKisacWw7gHeaHPjbY9HrkrHdtN+aSiQqWZTTy2WFANm8WJ3vaHHrx+1oe93WSXK52EQNxAxkY1ZyTcx3a+hHJNr4DEAw2fpMoAKnaqu0llCXgn; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by mail.feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1TqSGi-000IxV-3u; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 11:38:20 -0600 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1357148294-10079-10078/5/3; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:38:14 +0000 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:38:13 -0600 From: Mark Felder To: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com Subject: Re: is csup broken? Message-Id: <20130102113813.2e9d42cf@tech304.office.supranet.net> In-Reply-To: <50E45B78.5040609@a1poweruser.com> References: <50E44EC9.6070301@a1poweruser.com> <20130102162025.d7ef8fd5.freebsd@edvax.de> <50E4539E.7050803@a1poweruser.com> <20130102164728.abc6cc34.freebsd@edvax.de> <50E45B78.5040609@a1poweruser.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SA-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, KHOP_THREADED=-0.5 X-SA-Score: -1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:38:27 -0000 On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:08:24 -0500 fbsd8@a1poweruser.com wrote: > This 9.1 release was released prematurely. It has more problems > them 5.0 had which had a re-release 2 weeks later to fix problems. This is FUD. Stop being afraid of change. Users use portsnap Power users use svn There's no use trying to cover everyone's edge cases. You'll never keep = everyone happy. > Now I just had a port I maintain committed yesterday > and I have no way to test it to verify the port is working. Please don't commit ports to the ports tree if you have not tested them! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 17:39:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017962385 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:39:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from mail.feld.me (mail.feld.me [66.170.3.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDA31899 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:39:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=B5///P2HX1nPNgFaEuh2s8/jMH/4tnlCb8ceoFrdmiY=; b=ocpBaYUgPeurLPBTxm8fQZyZmOEhp7K4/wlFhPvsbNQQ1ao6gdFw0x/ullsR8mopTUGlLcPWo8nWntoYstdFHA7Yh9mh4+fLPi/HgmFRkavgRVP9r1liLEUu8/u2S6Jt; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by mail.feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1TqSHu-000IxV-DE; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 11:39:34 -0600 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1357148373-10079-10078/5/4; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:39:33 +0000 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:39:32 -0600 From: Mark Felder To: Leslie Jensen Subject: Re: SOLVED...Re: Trying to find out how to mount as user Message-Id: <20130102113932.3caadb0a@tech304.office.supranet.net> In-Reply-To: <50E46493.5020306@eskk.nu> References: <50E46078.9010407@eskk.nu> <50E46493.5020306@eskk.nu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SA-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, KHOP_THREADED=-0.5 X-SA-Score: -1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:39:38 -0000 On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:47:15 +0100 Leslie Jensen wrote: > I was on a wired connection first and the on wifi so I had two = different=20 > IP-addresses! FYI a cool trick is to bridge your ethernet and wifi so you can keep = your IP and roam between wired and wireless :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 17:46:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6F12D31 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:46:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ascherrer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C645618CC for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b47so7253823eek.31 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:45:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cyO+YNWxWA/8o/2XdMPESsyKBlZZrqi4varA4/eoSNQ=; b=QbIAgeEZZgNjrnDM2TN8MRi94uL76COUtjfvzCN7pQYenQqBeViNC6AoiDYqAxZhlW ZcHjC8k9NWFy6nm1iYxoodboLnqqt6Jy6T19IUgVfqkMJQ20k4BFwX/pnctssUn76dRy 6eW9ORWitFKOedGv0AEyq8662BVHImWzBcshg1abjAId7CFb6nMUjjqMP/B/6LyPyINR 4fLLiYwwUZJ2dm9xoJyCRVPi5XlTu7Ydq858ty5JTSztjFbYX23BDl/+vPIG8qkc95GO PqLxPUPxrIW9bAOW/ktEainvLfF2yHW72ktdu31DU8D2S4PlTE4J8RBqy/eV7ZxaxxrQ zhRA== X-Received: by 10.14.184.134 with SMTP id s6mr126313158eem.43.1357148753027; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:45:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from manzana.hws.homeip.net ([2001:470:b71d:1:225:ff:fef2:447f]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b2sm98818694eep.9.2013.01.02.09.45.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:45:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50E4724E.9050706@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:45:50 +0100 From: andreas scherrer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: freebsd-update patches custom /boot/kernel/kernel which it should not X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:46:00 -0000 Hi This can be considered a follow up to the message "How to keep freebsd-update from trashing custom kernel?" sent to this list by Brett Glass on August 13th 2012 (see [1]). Unfortunately there is no solution to the problem in that thread (or I cannot see it). I am running currently running 9.0-RELEASE-p4 and freebsd-update recommends to update to p5. It states: ----- The following files will be updated as part of updating to 9.0-RELEASE-p5: /boot/kernel/kernel ----- And from experience this is what it will do: replace /boot/kernel/kernel which is my custom kernel with a GENERIC kernel. As it seems that freebsd-update works by comparing a hash of /boot/kernel/kernel with the GENERIC kernel's hash I checked the md5 and sha1 hash of /boot/kernel/kernel and /boot/GENERIC/kernel. They differ (see [3]). So why is freebsd-update going to overwrite my custom kernel? And how can I prevent it from doing so? By the way there is a post on superuser.com describing the same issue (see [2]). Best Regards andreas [1] http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/How-to-keep-freebsd-update-from-trashing-custom-kernel-tt5733932.html#none [2] http://superuser.com/questions/507322/freebsd-update-patches-custom-boot-kernel-kernel-which-breaks-remote-access [3] # md5 /boot/kernel/kernel MD5 (/boot/kernel/kernel) = 5757af02283522328c3537b8550a286a # sha1 /boot/kernel/kernel SHA1 (/boot/kernel/kernel) = a513c6d0d0a71fa5d74156c000952a5211e41465 # md5 /boot/GENERIC/kernel MD5 (/boot/GENERIC/kernel) = 3795c8766abf8e16088b5f1305931483 # sha1 /boot/GENERIC/kernel SHA1 (/boot/GENERIC/kernel) = 3a32246b3ce5f13ddeef336c010adf8f354443da From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 17:53:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9932ECA for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:53:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f177.google.com (mail-ob0-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF83F1905 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id uo13so13178288obb.36 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:52:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=EIAn5NlPZ3Tn7KXAz6ra65tIcVj7bazS/sY74KkQy+0=; b=gyNKGu1J9Ipd3XUEVTAllkA8dY4wYYZa6R+ZC85y4kMKPzoOHH4vTJELqK1qfuvYPU XzKMoqSa7ZJdKwGHFENlQXOr6W3LlXpR71oQYxydRFLkplPlQBLKjE2jySzSt0w1oHoy FtxklkvVdrJuno9AoDePOUFFRztw8Fx/CpslL75C9EoVIpSNE467ZU9PMx0LPYq/Apv9 1efAF4FHplrYJQ+NfFuJ1bg6ejcUWfI4LKbkuHUyRpCk+wmJxqaavSoZwwbEE9X0jmVr GSs9RGoT2xrjuieMtbkVswQoKUVSCyR6Hbf47XJMinv+nLczKLxU+wf6TWTtrxLDa+s+ pZEQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.131.3 with SMTP id oi3mr33837184obb.13.1357149159710; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:52:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.119.9 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 09:52:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50E46493.5020306@eskk.nu> References: <50E46078.9010407@eskk.nu> <50E46493.5020306@eskk.nu> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 09:52:39 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: SOLVED...Re: Trying to find out how to mount as user From: Michael Sierchio To: Leslie Jensen X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlSj2iF2s26Smt9GthA/AQvfld8AJjAZgvihrs/v9QDxCZKBUQsbgIvO2JZdssoI4favdAW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:53:01 -0000 On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote: > > I was on a wired connection first and the on wifi so I had two different > IP-addresses! > > New question: > Instead of having the following in my /etc/exports > > /backup machine01 machine02 > > Can I put my internal network as 192.168.0/24? > > man exports From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 17:57:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A19133 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:57:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1422C196D for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:57:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 09:57:48 -0800 Message-ID: <50E4751A.2040501@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:57:46 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Felder Subject: Re: is csup broken? References: <50E44EC9.6070301@a1poweruser.com> <20130102162025.d7ef8fd5.freebsd@edvax.de> <50E4539E.7050803@a1poweruser.com> <20130102164728.abc6cc34.freebsd@edvax.de> <50E45B78.5040609@a1poweruser.com> <20130102113813.2e9d42cf@tech304.office.supranet.net> In-Reply-To: <20130102113813.2e9d42cf@tech304.office.supranet.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jan 2013 17:57:48.0921 (UTC) FILETIME=[AD43FE90:01CDE912] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:57:54 -0000 Mark Felder wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:08:24 -0500 > fbsd8@a1poweruser.com wrote: > >> This 9.1 release was released prematurely. It has more problems >> them 5.0 had which had a re-release 2 weeks later to fix problems. > > This is FUD. Stop being afraid of change. > > Users use portsnap > Power users use svn > > There's no use trying to cover everyone's edge cases. You'll never keep everyone happy. > >> Now I just had a port I maintain committed yesterday >> and I have no way to test it to verify the port is working. > > Please don't commit ports to the ports tree if you have not tested them! > > Hay cutting out part of the post to make things look different than they are is just wrong. As the thread explains the situation which you conveniently cut out. If my words were not clear. My port works at my end, but I also check that the comment port process does not get kinked messing up the port at the ports system end. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 18:15:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52C144C for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asv@inhio.eu) Received: from cz-prg-mx-01.inhio.eu (mail.inhio.eu [178.238.36.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5121AB8 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.2.3] (93-45-217-75.ip104.fastwebnet.it [93.45.217.75]) by cz-prg-mx-01.inhio.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B463E6A179; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:19:20 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Newbie question about freebsd-update: single user mode is not needed anymore? From: ASV To: Jose Garcia Juanino In-Reply-To: <20121231155020.GA13656@banach> References: <20121231121350.GA5026@banach> <1356967664.2050.9.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> <20121231155020.GA13656@banach> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:19:19 +0100 Message-ID: <1356970759.2050.30.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:15:18 -0000 Well, I understand your concern. I've been using the freebsd-update method since several years now and mostly remotely. I've never encounter a problem. I haven't recompiled everything many times as I didn't really found a tangible advantage in this method but I've never thought about this. I believe some developer around here can provide you a neat explanation about that (which is going to be interesting to know). Strictly about your concern I believe whatever way you use for your upgrade you CANNOT be 100% sure that your upgrade will go smoothly and things like loosing control of your remote box will not happen. Even though jumping from close releases 9.0 => 9.1 is a low risk upgrade, a console access to your remote server (via terminal server/KVM/other) is imperative in these cases to avoid the worst. On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 16:50 +0100, Jose Garcia Juanino wrote: > El lunes 31 de diciembre a las 16:27:44 CET, ASV escribió: > > Hi Jose, > > > > with the freebsd-update method you don't need to pass through the "make > > installworld" as it's a binary patch/upgrade system. > > Using "freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.1-RELEASE" for example allows you to > > get your system patched directly without recompiling the kernel and the > > userland but getting binary patches from the repo and applying these > > directly on your system. > > Check the following page for a more detailed explanation and be aware > > that upgrading your ports/packages is required every time you upgrade > > your kernel to a major version (which would be your case). > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html > > > > Happy new year. > > Thanks for your response. > > The freebsd-update upgrade method is: > 1- freebsd-update install # will install a new kernel and modules > 2- reboot in multi user > 3- freebsd-update install # will install new userland > 4- reboot in multi user > > The src upgrade method is: > 1- make installkernel # will install a new kernel > 2- reboot in single user > 3- make installworld # will install a new userland > 4- reboot in multiuser > > I think that the third step is essentially the same in both methods: it > will install a new userland. But the second one require to be ran in > single user, and the first one does not. Why? > > My unique concern is that step 2 in "freebsd-update" method goes > smootly: it will boot kernel in 9.1-RELEASE but userland in 9.0-RELEASE. > If the system hangs giving up the net or other essential service, I will > not be able to reach the computer via ssh. > > Regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 18:15:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85D044D for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asv@inhio.eu) Received: from cz-prg-mx-01.inhio.eu (mail.inhio.eu [178.238.36.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13CD1AB9 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.2.3] (93-45-217-75.ip104.fastwebnet.it [93.45.217.75]) by cz-prg-mx-01.inhio.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D66F96A123; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Newbie question about freebsd-update: single user mode is not needed anymore? From: ASV To: Jose Garcia Juanino In-Reply-To: <20121231121350.GA5026@banach> References: <20121231121350.GA5026@banach> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:27:44 +0100 Message-ID: <1356967664.2050.9.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:15:18 -0000 Hi Jose, with the freebsd-update method you don't need to pass through the "make installworld" as it's a binary patch/upgrade system. Using "freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.1-RELEASE" for example allows you to get your system patched directly without recompiling the kernel and the userland but getting binary patches from the repo and applying these directly on your system. Check the following page for a more detailed explanation and be aware that upgrading your ports/packages is required every time you upgrade your kernel to a major version (which would be your case). http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html Happy new year. On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 13:13 +0100, Jose Garcia Juanino wrote: > Hi, > > I am planning to upgrade from FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE to > FreeBSD-9.1-RELEASE. With upgrade source method, it is always needed to > do the "make installworld" step in single user mode. But it seems to > be that single user is not required with freebsd-update method, in the > second "freebsd-update install". Someone could explain the reason? Am I > misunderstanding something? Can I run the upgrade enterely by mean a ssh > connection in a safe way, or will I need a serial console? > > Best regards, and excuse my poor english. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 18:15:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A05450 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:15:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asv@inhio.eu) Received: from cz-prg-mx-01.inhio.eu (mail.inhio.eu [178.238.36.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DC51ABA for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.2.3] (93-45-216-171.ip104.fastwebnet.it [93.45.216.171]) by cz-prg-mx-01.inhio.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5722D6241D for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 12:33:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: just a curiosity about auth.conf From: ASV To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 13:33:27 +0100 Message-ID: <1357043607.2063.13.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:15:24 -0000 Good afternoon and happy new year to everybody. I'm just curious about auth.conf. According to the detailed release notes (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.1R/relnotes-detailed.html): "auth.conf(5) has been removed because it was deprecated years ago.[r238481]" but according to the man pages online AUTH.CONF(5) of FBSD9.0-RELEASE: "auth.conf contains various attributes important to the authentication code, most notably crypt(3) for the time being. This documentation will be updated as the /etc/auth.conf file, which is very new, evolves.". How can something deprecated years ago being new and evolving quickly enough to require further doc updates? Am I missing something? :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 18:16:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ADB761D for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:16:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=707b37d7b=pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com) Received: from ip-002.utdallas.edu (ip-002.utdallas.edu [129.110.20.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737881AD1 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:16:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Group: None X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Apw2ABp45FCBbgog/2dsb2JhbABFgX+7WHOCHgEBBAE4AkQLC0YhNgYBEhuHZgMJBrBDDYhAi21qg2JhA4hii1SNDYURgxM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,397,1355119200"; d="scan'208";a="113148609" Received: from zxtm01.utdallas.edu (HELO utd71538.utdallas.edu) ([129.110.10.32]) by ip-002.utdallas.edu with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 02 Jan 2013 12:15:30 -0600 Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:15:27 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: andreas scherrer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update patches custom /boot/kernel/kernel which it should not Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <50E4724E.9050706@gmail.com> References: <50E4724E.9050706@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; size=1603 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:16:52 -0000 --On January 2, 2013 6:45:50 PM +0100 andreas scherrer wrote: > Hi > > This can be considered a follow up to the message "How to keep > freebsd-update from trashing custom kernel?" sent to this list by Brett > Glass on August 13th 2012 (see [1]). Unfortunately there is no solution > to the problem in that thread (or I cannot see it). > > I am running currently running 9.0-RELEASE-p4 and freebsd-update > recommends to update to p5. It states: > > ----- > The following files will be updated as part of updating to 9.0-RELEASE-p5: > /boot/kernel/kernel > > ----- > > And from experience this is what it will do: replace /boot/kernel/kernel > which is my custom kernel with a GENERIC kernel. > > As it seems that freebsd-update works by comparing a hash of > /boot/kernel/kernel with the GENERIC kernel's hash I checked the md5 and > sha1 hash of /boot/kernel/kernel and /boot/GENERIC/kernel. They differ > (see [3]). > > So why is freebsd-update going to overwrite my custom kernel? And how > can I prevent it from doing so? > Read man (5) freebsd-update.conf. Particularly the COMPONENTS portion that explains how to update world without changing kernel. -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ******************************************* "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson "There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them." George Orwell From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 18:21:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A8D8C1 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:21:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asv@inhio.eu) Received: from cz-prg-mx-01.inhio.eu (mail.inhio.eu [178.238.36.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050811B48 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.2.3] (93-45-216-171.ip104.fastwebnet.it [93.45.216.171]) by cz-prg-mx-01.inhio.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 838766240C; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 11:36:16 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Newbie question about freebsd-update: single user mode is not needed anymore? From: ASV To: Jose Garcia Juanino In-Reply-To: <20121231155020.GA13656@banach> References: <20121231121350.GA5026@banach> <1356967664.2050.9.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> <20121231155020.GA13656@banach> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 12:36:15 +0100 Message-ID: <1357040175.2063.1.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:21:29 -0000 For some reason my email hasn't apparently been delivered so I'm re-sending it. "From: ASV To: Jose Garcia Juanino Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Newbie question about freebsd-update: single user mode is not needed anymore? Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:19:19 +0100|" Well, I understand your concern. I've been using the freebsd-update method since several years now and mostly remotely. I've never encounter a problem. I haven't recompiled everything many times as I didn't really found a tangible advantage in this method but I've never thought about this. I believe some developer around here can provide you a neat explanation about that (which is going to be interesting to know). Strictly about your concern I believe whatever way you use for your upgrade you CANNOT be 100% sure that your upgrade will go smoothly and things like loosing control of your remote box will not happen. Even though jumping from close releases 9.0 => 9.1 is a low risk upgrade, a console access to your remote server (via terminal server/KVM/other) is imperative in these cases to avoid the worst. On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 16:50 +0100, Jose Garcia Juanino wrote: > El lunes 31 de diciembre a las 16:27:44 CET, ASV escribió: > > Hi Jose, > > > > with the freebsd-update method you don't need to pass through the "make > > installworld" as it's a binary patch/upgrade system. > > Using "freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.1-RELEASE" for example allows you to > > get your system patched directly without recompiling the kernel and the > > userland but getting binary patches from the repo and applying these > > directly on your system. > > Check the following page for a more detailed explanation and be aware > > that upgrading your ports/packages is required every time you upgrade > > your kernel to a major version (which would be your case). > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html > > > > Happy new year. > > Thanks for your response. > > The freebsd-update upgrade method is: > 1- freebsd-update install # will install a new kernel and modules > 2- reboot in multi user > 3- freebsd-update install # will install new userland > 4- reboot in multi user > > The src upgrade method is: > 1- make installkernel # will install a new kernel > 2- reboot in single user > 3- make installworld # will install a new userland > 4- reboot in multiuser > > I think that the third step is essentially the same in both methods: it > will install a new userland. But the second one require to be ran in > single user, and the first one does not. Why? > > My unique concern is that step 2 in "freebsd-update" method goes > smootly: it will boot kernel in 9.1-RELEASE but userland in 9.0-RELEASE. > If the system hangs giving up the net or other essential service, I will > not be able to reach the computer via ssh. > > Regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 18:24:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACEEEB6D for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:24:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA2B1BDB for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TqSzh-0003mT-Pw for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:24:49 +0100 Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.21.186.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:24:49 +0100 Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:24:49 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Walter Hurry Subject: Re: using /etc/portsnap.conf Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:24:14 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <50E46E0D.5030202@a1poweruser.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 30dc37b master) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:24:59 -0000 On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:27:41 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > When issuing the portsnap command will it automatically read the > /etc/portsnap.conf file or is the -f option mandatory? It will use /etc/portsnap.conf by default. No need for -f unless you need to use a different config file. By the way, in answer to your question in another thread, you don't have to extract the whole tree if you don't want to. Use 'portsnap fetch' the first time around, and then portsnap extract the port you want. See 'man portsnap', and remember to cater for the dependencies. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 18:28:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C43E5C for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:28:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com (mail-oa0-f54.google.com [209.85.219.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B0A1C30 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n9so13363887oag.13 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:28:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=+MQeS0nB8B149B3jEjHos1ngtR6cQM5l/da8q3XalXs=; b=EpYnB4Ntouny0gYdbQwrMNnzcjrHPfSTr33yXthwhAgMNW2gQMhpBTojvqmkxa0rVe W00GK5Yzp+2DDmK8qRTC0AABPm27PTJMDRps5G0pv3IN9TfC04LNcOJLUvCl9fmojFtk WaxkzSDumJCEiS6Ri5On929Vr/9BiWNNI/sl1utpwI/D5qOW07jsjEG47e+TfJJXMwY0 4hHsBB5CoSO8nv5fF2+wU6r2KOYSxQja4j96AgErlOmQ3sJqJMJrvNzsG1JvLP392TTu ewDvmHRVfIaB4yljZKbMBTZ96+Hv++/wRFuz+dWraJMf9DchVG53o8h45gWhrrVfDd9H i89w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.157.82 with SMTP id wk18mr37314205obb.26.1357151300184; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:28:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.119.9 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 10:28:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <50E4724E.9050706@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 10:28:20 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: freebsd-update patches custom /boot/kernel/kernel which it should not From: Michael Sierchio To: Paul Schmehl X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlbKcN8rcTmhE7IPVNJZOokgUBajmxEGOQf/XLdMtiTvDV44QXyVbKx+pu8eJme3qVf45xj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, andreas scherrer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:28:33 -0000 The confusion comes from the fact that the original behavior of freebsd-update was NOT to update the kernel binaries if a custom kernel was detected. FYI my /etc/freebsd-update.conf has # Components of the base system which should be kept updated. #Components src world kernel Components src world From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 19:18:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386693DA for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 19:18:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ascherrer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f45.google.com (mail-ee0-f45.google.com [74.125.83.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2FF1E95 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 19:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f45.google.com with SMTP id d49so6972677eek.18 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 11:18:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BifYOD6lhuxNa1v45j45l6AXBUL/VeGFoUnC8854PPE=; b=mQoCnoJSv4cQ5tD2z+To12V8UuLhcmw4eV13SbC8uZtKA+6SsYm/jqk/bZaiOznlb4 uH8sZwfC83Qs3eIMQgmMyQ1/Ybx8a4E3pkyNCfkTJX4DtR1QeRaP4TlBqfr9DKTuh1SX wHRc0lNqWYpg1TkiQp/NxUZWl/a57Ksvxcp0CcUzXeqQOxNL8ppybYV4KKhMvy885J7M P/LeYVpUJSvtZoXjkJF5OoiedO3DhNa3sHdkkwmyJo8apac0GDKcQpekRfcllfWeIKi9 Toqqey72bToP2ZSnNJzxjBC3XfeSttKYsE4oWIFQUJQyXh/Rucjto6PRG78/RGYHqHTU 8vfQ== X-Received: by 10.14.204.198 with SMTP id h46mr128179832eeo.1.1357154321559; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 11:18:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from manzana.hws.homeip.net ([2001:470:b71d:1:225:ff:fef2:447f]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d3sm99332836eeo.13.2013.01.02.11.18.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Jan 2013 11:18:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50E4880E.8030105@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 20:18:38 +0100 From: andreas scherrer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl Subject: Re: freebsd-update patches custom /boot/kernel/kernel which it should not References: <50E4724E.9050706@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:18:48 -0000 on 2.1.13 19:15 Paul Schmehl said the following: > --On January 2, 2013 6:45:50 PM +0100 andreas scherrer >> And from experience this is what it will do: replace /boot/kernel/kernel >> which is my custom kernel with a GENERIC kernel. >> >> As it seems that freebsd-update works by comparing a hash of >> /boot/kernel/kernel with the GENERIC kernel's hash I checked the md5 and >> sha1 hash of /boot/kernel/kernel and /boot/GENERIC/kernel. They differ >> (see [3]). >> >> So why is freebsd-update going to overwrite my custom kernel? And how >> can I prevent it from doing so? >> > > Read man (5) freebsd-update.conf. Particularly the COMPONENTS portion > that explains how to update world without changing kernel. Thanks for pointing this out. I might change my freebsd-update.conf to not update the kernel. But still I believe this to be more of a kludge than a solution: in my opinion the handbook suggests that a custom kernel should be detected and left alone. But at the same time a GENERIC kernel in /boot/GENERIC should be patched. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html ----- However, freebsd-update will detect and update the GENERIC kernel in /boot/GENERIC (if it exists), even if it is not the current (running) kernel of the system. ----- Furthermore if I remove the kernel option from the COMPONENTS in freebsd-update.conf I think I will not get the kernel source patches anymore, right? Which in turn means I have to get them via some other mechanism, no? >From the same link as above to the handbook: ----- Unless the default configuration in /etc/freebsd-update.conf has been changed, freebsd-update will install the updated kernel sources along with the rest of the updates. ----- I think something does not add up here but I can't get my head around it (yet?). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 19:27:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE25525 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 19:27:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com (mail-oa0-f44.google.com [209.85.219.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97ED31EDB for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 19:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n5so13454412oag.3 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 11:26:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=vz3kxKKr/YUMUjNCIfdTFNiU9suzbmkkCj2SlpmBr/E=; b=RKPXKKIPZraXJq6OTIhewUptsZ02+57YmErggikRBNxhUrQt/P/h4xuRrwABpALJia Coa6JdaJGOQyGOh2ny9mQDdV4tA56eX5Eh+kipptECSDVbxJkqVsktyIERgmVPXrY++e 2H/JToGC3uUGjYltGC6dAe7zR4MorS29Yk+FcnyJybMMQeBeTHHZk9++jdu805VV6ZCQ GpWgaubcL+XlS2bzvJAwKOynPgrzn4rTKitlh690+AutRkpWJV4/ZhJ9p9/Rt/EVBOLL uOP/fMpG6U/TPJahonKak7B0q0c8ovYqlofswpp6bjLWI8jG9WsWld9UKZS7+x/pmFYj sYag== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.24.97 with SMTP id t1mr26022458oef.6.1357154819146; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 11:26:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.119.9 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:26:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50E4880E.8030105@gmail.com> References: <50E4724E.9050706@gmail.com> <50E4880E.8030105@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:26:59 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: freebsd-update patches custom /boot/kernel/kernel which it should not From: Michael Sierchio To: andreas scherrer X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkVJicu2HeagR3OwlT7kfF5Nw3v7K6FsTrVqX85t82UiII/ngVx7r06kXOjEuQwx7oDvcV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:27:05 -0000 On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:18 AM, andreas scherrer wrote: This is no longer true, though it was true at the time that was written... ----- > However, freebsd-update will detect and update the GENERIC kernel in > /boot/GENERIC (if it exists), even if it is not the current (running) > kernel of the system. > This is no longer true, though it was true at the time > ----- > > Furthermore if I remove the kernel option from the COMPONENTS in > freebsd-update.conf I think I will not get the kernel source patches > anymore, right? Which in turn means I have to get them via some other > mechanism, no? > > No. If you have Components src world you'll get all sources - which you want, presumably, since /usr/src/sys changes are sometimes motivated by security vulnerabilities.. - M From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 19:47:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D3D7C80 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 19:47:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=707b37d7b=pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com) Received: from ip-001.utdallas.edu (ip-001.utdallas.edu [129.110.20.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2329898 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 19:47:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Group: None X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap02AEmN5FCBbgog/2dsb2JhbABFgX+7WHOCHgEBBAE4Aj8FCwtGITYGEwkSh2YDCQYMsEkNhkKLbYESgzphA4hii1SNDYURgxOBSw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,398,1355119200"; d="scan'208";a="119191071" Received: from zxtm01.utdallas.edu (HELO utd71538.utdallas.edu) ([129.110.10.32]) by ip-001.utdallas.edu with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 02 Jan 2013 13:46:26 -0600 Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 13:46:25 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: andreas scherrer Subject: Re: freebsd-update patches custom /boot/kernel/kernel which it should not Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <50E4880E.8030105@gmail.com> References: <50E4724E.9050706@gmail.com> <50E4880E.8030105@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; size=2843 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:47:37 -0000 --On January 2, 2013 8:18:38 PM +0100 andreas scherrer wrote: > on 2.1.13 19:15 Paul Schmehl said the following: >> --On January 2, 2013 6:45:50 PM +0100 andreas scherrer >>> And from experience this is what it will do: replace /boot/kernel/kernel >>> which is my custom kernel with a GENERIC kernel. >>> >>> As it seems that freebsd-update works by comparing a hash of >>> /boot/kernel/kernel with the GENERIC kernel's hash I checked the md5 and >>> sha1 hash of /boot/kernel/kernel and /boot/GENERIC/kernel. They differ >>> (see [3]). >>> >>> So why is freebsd-update going to overwrite my custom kernel? And how >>> can I prevent it from doing so? >>> >> >> Read man (5) freebsd-update.conf. Particularly the COMPONENTS portion >> that explains how to update world without changing kernel. > > Thanks for pointing this out. I might change my freebsd-update.conf to > not update the kernel. But still I believe this to be more of a kludge > than a solution: in my opinion the handbook suggests that a custom > kernel should be detected and left alone. But at the same time a GENERIC > kernel in /boot/GENERIC should be patched. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html > ----- That needs to be updated. > However, freebsd-update will detect and update the GENERIC kernel in > /boot/GENERIC (if it exists), even if it is not the current (running) > kernel of the system. > ----- > > Furthermore if I remove the kernel option from the COMPONENTS in > freebsd-update.conf I think I will not get the kernel source patches > anymore, right? Which in turn means I have to get them via some other > mechanism, no? > See UpdateIfUnmodified in the man page. You can specify a regex pattern that prevents the kernel from being modified but still downloads the sources. Or you can simply pull source from svn, which I think would be my preferred method. Once you've made the first pull, you can use svn to pull all the kernel updates subsequent to that first pull and then buildkernel as you normally do. >> From the same link as above to the handbook: > ----- > Unless the default configuration in /etc/freebsd-update.conf has been > changed, freebsd-update will install the updated kernel sources along > with the rest of the updates. > ----- > > I think something does not add up here but I can't get my head around it > (yet?). > The Handbook is out of date. -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ******************************************* "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson "There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them." George Orwell From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 20:55:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CAE1958 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 20:55:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=707b37d7b=pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com) Received: from ip-001.utdallas.edu (ip-001.utdallas.edu [129.110.20.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E812A2 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 20:55:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Group: None X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap4EAAme5FCBbgog/2dsb2JhbABFgX+7WnOCHgEBBTgCPxALGC4hNgYTCRKHZgMPDLBYDYZCi22BEoM6YQOIYotUjQ2FEYMTgUs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,398,1355119200"; d="scan'208";a="119192437" Received: from zxtm01.utdallas.edu (HELO utd71538.utdallas.edu) ([129.110.10.32]) by ip-001.utdallas.edu with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 02 Jan 2013 14:55:35 -0600 Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:55:34 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: andreas scherrer Subject: Re: freebsd-update patches custom /boot/kernel/kernel which it should not Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <50E4724E.9050706@gmail.com> <50E4880E.8030105@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; size=2594 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 20:55:39 -0000 --On January 2, 2013 1:46:25 PM -0600 Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On January 2, 2013 8:18:38 PM +0100 andreas scherrer > wrote: > >> on 2.1.13 19:15 Paul Schmehl said the following: >>> --On January 2, 2013 6:45:50 PM +0100 andreas scherrer >>>> And from experience this is what it will do: replace >>>> /boot/kernel/kernel which is my custom kernel with a GENERIC kernel. >>>> >>>> As it seems that freebsd-update works by comparing a hash of >>>> /boot/kernel/kernel with the GENERIC kernel's hash I checked the md5 >>>> and sha1 hash of /boot/kernel/kernel and /boot/GENERIC/kernel. They >>>> differ (see [3]). >>>> >>>> So why is freebsd-update going to overwrite my custom kernel? And how >>>> can I prevent it from doing so? >>>> >>> >>> Read man (5) freebsd-update.conf. Particularly the COMPONENTS portion >>> that explains how to update world without changing kernel. >> >> Thanks for pointing this out. I might change my freebsd-update.conf to >> not update the kernel. But still I believe this to be more of a kludge >> than a solution: in my opinion the handbook suggests that a custom >> kernel should be detected and left alone. But at the same time a GENERIC >> kernel in /boot/GENERIC should be patched. >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html >> ----- > > That needs to be updated. > >> However, freebsd-update will detect and update the GENERIC kernel in >> /boot/GENERIC (if it exists), even if it is not the current (running) >> kernel of the system. >> ----- >> >> Furthermore if I remove the kernel option from the COMPONENTS in >> freebsd-update.conf I think I will not get the kernel source patches >> anymore, right? Which in turn means I have to get them via some other >> mechanism, no? >> > > See UpdateIfUnmodified in the man page. You can specify a regex pattern > that prevents the kernel from being modified but still downloads the > sources. > I wasn't thinking when I wrote this. Freebsd-update pulls *binary* copies of files, so you're not ever going to get the src files to rebuild your kernel from freebsd-update. You need to pull those in using svn. -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ******************************************* "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson "There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them." George Orwell From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 21:02:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B60FEFF for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 21:02:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0FD02F2 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 21:02:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.6/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r02L2Gd5071752 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 21:02:17 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk r02L2Gd5071752 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/r02L2Gd5071752; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Message-ID: <50E4A04B.3070801@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 21:02:03 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl Subject: Re: freebsd-update patches custom /boot/kernel/kernel which it should not References: <50E4724E.9050706@gmail.com> <50E4880E.8030105@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig4EC91106D5A8E441EE877659" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, andreas scherrer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 21:02:24 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4EC91106D5A8E441EE877659 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/01/2013 20:55, Paul Schmehl wrote: > I wasn't thinking when I wrote this. Freebsd-update pulls *binary* > copies of files, so you're not ever going to get the src files to > rebuild your kernel from freebsd-update. You need to pull those in > using svn. Not so. Take a look at /etc/freebsd-update.conf -- if you have 'src' listed as one of the Components, freebsd-update will keep your /usr/src up to date. Primarily this is intendend for people that want to do binary updates of userland, but compile their own kernels for particular device support or whatever reason. However there's no reason why you couldn't just use freebsd-update just to grab system sources, and them update by building and installing world. If you want to track a release brance, and you don't intend to do any development work on the sources, then freebsd-update is going to be a lot more efficient for you than SVN. Outside that particular audience, however, svn rules. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig4EC91106D5A8E441EE877659 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDkoFgACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzkiwCfaec52mlOmA+rDDe6AKSrxhE6 chUAnj8hKV6QTCLOcZV1Cx3COlAqNadU =V1XG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4EC91106D5A8E441EE877659-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 23:43:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D123FB40 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 23:43:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C43A65 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 23:43:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:43:39 -0800 Message-ID: <50E4C628.8050207@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:43:36 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Walter Hurry Subject: Re: using /etc/portsnap.conf References: <50E46E0D.5030202@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jan 2013 23:43:39.0337 (UTC) FILETIME=[FD7A3390:01CDE942] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 23:43:38 -0000 Walter Hurry wrote: > On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:27:41 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > >> When issuing the portsnap command will it automatically read the >> /etc/portsnap.conf file or is the -f option mandatory? > > It will use /etc/portsnap.conf by default. No need for -f unless you need > to use a different config file. > > By the way, in answer to your question in another thread, you don't have > to extract the whole tree if you don't want to. Use 'portsnap fetch' the > first time around, and then portsnap extract the port you want. See 'man > portsnap', and remember to cater for the dependencies. > My /ect/portsnap.conf looks like this. # $FreeBSD: src/etc/portsnap.conf,v 1.5.2.1.2.1 2009/10/25 01:10:29 kensmith Exp $ # Default directory where compressed snapshots are stored. # WORKDIR=/var/db/portsnap # Default location of the ports tree # (target for "update" and "extract"). # PORTSDIR=/usr/ports # Server or server pool from which to fetch updates. You can change # this to point at a specific server if you want, but in most cases # using a "nearby" server won't provide a measurable improvement in # performance. SERVERNAME=portsnap.FreeBSD.org # Trusted keyprint. Changing this is a Bad Idea unless you've received # a PGP-signed email from telling you to # change it and explaining why. KEYPRINT=9b5feee6d69f170e3dd0a2c8e469ddbd64f13f978f2f3aede40c98633216c330 # List of INDEX files to build and the DESCRIBE file to use for each #INDEX INDEX-6 DESCRIBE.6 #INDEX INDEX-7 DESCRIBE.7 INDEX INDEX-8 DESCRIBE.8 # Example of ignoring parts of the ports tree. If you know that you # absolutely will not need certain parts of the tree, this will save # some bandwidth and disk space. See the manual page for more details. # # WARNING: Working with an incomplete ports tree is not supported and # can cause problems due to missing dependencies. If you have REFUSE # directives and experience problems, remove them and update your tree # before asking for help on the mailing lists. # REFUSE arabic chinese french german hebrew hungarian japanese REFUSE korean polish portuguese russian ukrainian vietnamese # # The following is complete list of all the port categories . # # REFUSE accessibility archivers astro audio benchmarks biology cad # REFUSE comms converters databases deskutils devel dns editors emulators # REFUSE finance ftp games graphics irc java lang mail math mbone misc # REFUSE multimedia net net-im net-mgmt net-p2p news palm ports-mgmt print # REFUSE science security shells textproc www # REFUSE x11 x11-clocks x11-drivers x11-fm x11-fonts x11-servers # REFUSE x11-themes x11-toolkits x11-wm # REFUSE sysutils # REFUSE accessibility archivers astro audio benchmarks biology cad REFUSE comms converters databases deskutils devel dns editors emulators REFUSE finance ftp games graphics irc java lang mail math mbone misc REFUSE multimedia net net-im net-mgmt net-p2p news palm ports-mgmt print REFUSE science security shells textproc www REFUSE x11 x11-clocks x11-drivers x11-fm x11-fonts x11-servers REFUSE x11-themes x11-toolkits x11-wm # REFUSE sysutils This should only populate /usr/ports/sysutils But its not being used because everything is being populated in /usr/ports. I do portsnap fetch followed by portsnap extract What am I doing wrong here? I even tried portsnap extract -f /etc/portsnap.conf with no joy. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 23:45:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FA5BEE for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 23:45:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrisom@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ia0-f178.google.com (mail-ia0-f178.google.com [209.85.210.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE14A7C for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 23:45:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f178.google.com with SMTP id k25so12538521iah.9 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:45:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CtNOki8oKm3Y3M6tQ7tQOR+BIuPg1N8yLK1JiNoQKYg=; b=xRZp3YbW+2IuxDJyxBorzBQbG5w0z7K4JjpDwS3lRlD/7r4viS7Ll5lO2+FeUza7L3 rKlnCKb/yGdoss4VXom5gzn1RLzVITXKx1LF2JPVCVs4EuCVz5v+nhtV5v9bxeKIsDrk xlApSMIejDvo+CIAoWWRMSp2L5ZEUFLFsjWlz8el4YAQ7v3xlileWoqFwgOHS8VTFbfL 43TXevSAfF2U+RH/q5ieQyKdlRS2i2Qq42/SpPvU+4b8JvCJ852UsXOdL+aiUiwsOmob S/e30JWizSI/KaJJ5b7Ben5TaMEvMueXUPNBIDA13VblS6aYX1x5ZRf7+biDxBzOZLEt n58Q== X-Received: by 10.42.212.4 with SMTP id gq4mr36066933icb.38.1357170336948; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:45:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.14] (c-98-212-197-211.hsd1.il.comcast.net. [98.212.197.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fa6sm39659565igb.2.2013.01.02.15.45.36 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:45:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50E4C69F.9090208@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:45:35 -0600 From: Joshua Isom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Upgrading from 9.0-STABLE to 9.1-RELEASE with freebsd-update? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 23:45:43 -0000 I've used STABLE for years, but with csup going away, I don't want to deal with adding extra packages, and keeping them unbroken, just to stay up date. Running freebsd-update doesn't work for people running STABLE, and I'm not sure freebsd-update will work properly anyway if I compile world for myself. What's the best way to switch from running STABLE to running the RELEASE channel? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 00:21:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9364FEF for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 00:21:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gmx@ross.cx) Received: from www81.your-server.de (www81.your-server.de [213.133.104.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339F9B81 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 00:21:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [88.70.112.46] (helo=michael-think) by www81.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.74) (envelope-from ) id 1TqYBc-0006k5-GJ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:57:28 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "Walter Hurry" , Fbsd8 Subject: Re: using /etc/portsnap.conf References: <50E46E0D.5030202@a1poweruser.com> <50E4C628.8050207@a1poweruser.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:57:20 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Michael Ross" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <50E4C628.8050207@a1poweruser.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.12 (Win32) X-Authenticated-Sender: gmx@ross.cx X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.97.5/16308/Wed Jan 2 23:55:22 2013) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:21:31 -0000 On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:43:36 +0100, Fbsd8 wrote: > Walter Hurry wrote: >> On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:27:41 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: >> >>> When issuing the portsnap command will it automatically read the >>> /etc/portsnap.conf file or is the -f option mandatory? >> It will use /etc/portsnap.conf by default. No need for -f unless you >> need to use a different config file. >> By the way, in answer to your question in another thread, you don't >> have to extract the whole tree if you don't want to. Use 'portsnap >> fetch' the first time around, and then portsnap extract the port you >> want. See 'man portsnap', and remember to cater for the dependencies. >> > > My /ect/portsnap.conf looks like this. > > # $FreeBSD: src/etc/portsnap.conf,v 1.5.2.1.2.1 2009/10/25 01:10:29 > kensmith Exp $ > > # Default directory where compressed snapshots are stored. > # WORKDIR=/var/db/portsnap > > # Default location of the ports tree > # (target for "update" and "extract"). > # PORTSDIR=/usr/ports > > # Server or server pool from which to fetch updates. You can change > # this to point at a specific server if you want, but in most cases > # using a "nearby" server won't provide a measurable improvement in > # performance. > SERVERNAME=portsnap.FreeBSD.org > > # Trusted keyprint. Changing this is a Bad Idea unless you've received > # a PGP-signed email from telling you to > # change it and explaining why. > KEYPRINT=9b5feee6d69f170e3dd0a2c8e469ddbd64f13f978f2f3aede40c98633216c330 > > # List of INDEX files to build and the DESCRIBE file to use for each > #INDEX INDEX-6 DESCRIBE.6 > #INDEX INDEX-7 DESCRIBE.7 > INDEX INDEX-8 DESCRIBE.8 > > # Example of ignoring parts of the ports tree. If you know that you > # absolutely will not need certain parts of the tree, this will save > # some bandwidth and disk space. See the manual page for more details. > # > # WARNING: Working with an incomplete ports tree is not supported and > # can cause problems due to missing dependencies. If you have REFUSE > # directives and experience problems, remove them and update your tree > # before asking for help on the mailing lists. > # > REFUSE arabic chinese french german hebrew hungarian japanese > REFUSE korean polish portuguese russian ukrainian vietnamese > # > # The following is complete list of all the port categories . > # > # REFUSE accessibility archivers astro audio benchmarks biology cad > # REFUSE comms converters databases deskutils devel dns editors emulators > # REFUSE finance ftp games graphics irc java lang mail math mbone misc > # REFUSE multimedia net net-im net-mgmt net-p2p news palm ports-mgmt > print > # REFUSE science security shells textproc www > # REFUSE x11 x11-clocks x11-drivers x11-fm x11-fonts x11-servers > # REFUSE x11-themes x11-toolkits x11-wm > # REFUSE sysutils > # > REFUSE accessibility archivers astro audio benchmarks biology cad > REFUSE comms converters databases deskutils devel dns editors emulators > REFUSE finance ftp games graphics irc java lang mail math mbone misc > REFUSE multimedia net net-im net-mgmt net-p2p news palm ports-mgmt > print > REFUSE science security shells textproc www > REFUSE x11 x11-clocks x11-drivers x11-fm x11-fonts x11-servers > REFUSE x11-themes x11-toolkits x11-wm > # REFUSE sysutils > > This should only populate /usr/ports/sysutils > > But its not being used because everything is being populated in > /usr/ports. > > I do portsnap fetch followed by portsnap extract > > What am I doing wrong here? > > I even tried portsnap extract -f /etc/portsnap.conf with no joy. > Just guessing: Try without the spaces at the beginning of the REFUSE lines? Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 00:35:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BBE337 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 00:35:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from james@mansionfamily.plus.com) Received: from avasout02.plus.net (avasout02.plus.net [212.159.14.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF26C24 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 00:35:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.barnhouse ([87.114.245.148]) by avasout02 with smtp id jCYM1k0053CpyCf01CYPcD; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:32:23 +0000 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=J7R0GnbS c=1 sm=1 a=hVBUcgCV8F7CJzaXmDyYag==:17 a=URPhxF5dMbEA:10 a=CaiL9ft7EWkA:10 a=ihvODaAuJD4A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=EBOSESyhAAAA:8 a=U7yQ1xoqLe8A:10 a=969-_8bOe-_axp8bvyMA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=5y8U40la7-JE1rcP:21 a=oU4JtHuXi0e4TcRX:21 a=hVBUcgCV8F7CJzaXmDyYag==:117 Received: from [192.168.0.96] (workstation.barnhouse [192.168.0.96]) by server.barnhouse (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3BC168015D for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 00:40:16 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <50E4D192.6060102@mansionfamily.plus.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:32:18 +0000 From: james User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: How to boot alternate installation? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: james@mansionfamily.plus.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:35:35 -0000 I have a system that boots 9.0+patches (claims to be 9.1-PRERELEASE but that's a stretch in this case) off an ssd on sata0 - I needed some mfi patches. Now that mfi is working, I have a raid1 pair on the mfi controller, and I've unpacked 9.1-RELEASE onto it using bsdinstall. Now, the crappy PERC5 and the AMI BIOS in my little AMD mobo don't really see eye to eye and I've had a lot of trouble coaxing it to boot from the RAID volume (the RAID card initialises late it seems). I'm happy to keep /boot on the SATA SSD for now. Is there a straightforward way to configure (the menus to) boot from 9.1? I'm happy enough to rename /boot on the SSD and copy over the contents from 9.1 (really the old 9.0+ system is there as insurance for the moment). Is the simplest mechanism to do that and override rootdev in loader.conf? It seems that there are a number of variables with "/boot/..." paths so its not so easy to switch between (say) /boot90 and /boot91. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 01:06:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114399E9 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 01:06:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20F3D63 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 01:06:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:06:50 -0800 Message-ID: <50E4D9A7.8070604@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 20:06:47 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Ross Subject: Re: using /etc/portsnap.conf References: <50E46E0D.5030202@a1poweruser.com> <50E4C628.8050207@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jan 2013 01:06:50.0854 (UTC) FILETIME=[9CA74060:01CDE94E] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Walter Hurry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 01:06:50 -0000 Michael Ross wrote: > On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:43:36 +0100, Fbsd8 wrote: > >> Walter Hurry wrote: >>> On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:27:41 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: >>> >>>> When issuing the portsnap command will it automatically read the >>>> /etc/portsnap.conf file or is the -f option mandatory? >>> It will use /etc/portsnap.conf by default. No need for -f unless you >>> need to use a different config file. >>> By the way, in answer to your question in another thread, you don't >>> have to extract the whole tree if you don't want to. Use 'portsnap >>> fetch' the first time around, and then portsnap extract the port you >>> want. See 'man portsnap', and remember to cater for the dependencies. >>> >> >> My /ect/portsnap.conf looks like this. >> >> # $FreeBSD: src/etc/portsnap.conf,v 1.5.2.1.2.1 2009/10/25 01:10:29 >> kensmith Exp $ >> >> # Default directory where compressed snapshots are stored. >> # WORKDIR=/var/db/portsnap >> >> # Default location of the ports tree >> # (target for "update" and "extract"). >> # PORTSDIR=/usr/ports >> >> # Server or server pool from which to fetch updates. You can change >> # this to point at a specific server if you want, but in most cases >> # using a "nearby" server won't provide a measurable improvement in >> # performance. >> SERVERNAME=portsnap.FreeBSD.org >> >> # Trusted keyprint. Changing this is a Bad Idea unless you've received >> # a PGP-signed email from telling you to >> # change it and explaining why. >> KEYPRINT=9b5feee6d69f170e3dd0a2c8e469ddbd64f13f978f2f3aede40c98633216c330 >> >> # List of INDEX files to build and the DESCRIBE file to use for each >> #INDEX INDEX-6 DESCRIBE.6 >> #INDEX INDEX-7 DESCRIBE.7 >> INDEX INDEX-8 DESCRIBE.8 >> >> # Example of ignoring parts of the ports tree. If you know that you >> # absolutely will not need certain parts of the tree, this will save >> # some bandwidth and disk space. See the manual page for more details. >> # >> # WARNING: Working with an incomplete ports tree is not supported and >> # can cause problems due to missing dependencies. If you have REFUSE >> # directives and experience problems, remove them and update your tree >> # before asking for help on the mailing lists. >> # >> REFUSE arabic chinese french german hebrew hungarian japanese >> REFUSE korean polish portuguese russian ukrainian vietnamese >> # >> # The following is complete list of all the port categories . >> # >> # REFUSE accessibility archivers astro audio benchmarks biology cad >> # REFUSE comms converters databases deskutils devel dns editors emulators >> # REFUSE finance ftp games graphics irc java lang mail math mbone misc >> # REFUSE multimedia net net-im net-mgmt net-p2p news palm ports-mgmt >> print >> # REFUSE science security shells textproc www >> # REFUSE x11 x11-clocks x11-drivers x11-fm x11-fonts x11-servers >> # REFUSE x11-themes x11-toolkits x11-wm >> # REFUSE sysutils >> # >> REFUSE accessibility archivers astro audio benchmarks biology cad >> REFUSE comms converters databases deskutils devel dns editors emulators >> REFUSE finance ftp games graphics irc java lang mail math mbone misc >> REFUSE multimedia net net-im net-mgmt net-p2p news palm ports-mgmt >> print >> REFUSE science security shells textproc www >> REFUSE x11 x11-clocks x11-drivers x11-fm x11-fonts x11-servers >> REFUSE x11-themes x11-toolkits x11-wm >> # REFUSE sysutils >> >> This should only populate /usr/ports/sysutils >> >> But its not being used because everything is being populated in >> /usr/ports. >> >> I do portsnap fetch followed by portsnap extract >> >> What am I doing wrong here? >> >> I even tried portsnap extract -f /etc/portsnap.conf with no joy. >> > > Just guessing: > > Try without the spaces at the beginning of the REFUSE lines? > > Thanks that was it. Sometimes your to close to the trees to see the forest. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 01:20:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA9CC6E for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 01:20:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B812DB6 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 01:20:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TqZU8-00008F-Tk for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 02:20:40 +0100 Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.21.186.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 02:20:40 +0100 Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 02:20:40 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Walter Hurry Subject: Re: using /etc/portsnap.conf Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 01:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: <50E46E0D.5030202@a1poweruser.com> <50E4C628.8050207@a1poweruser.com> <50E4D9A7.8070604@a1poweruser.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 30dc37b master) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 01:20:30 -0000 On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 20:06:47 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > Thanks that was it. > Sometimes your to close to the trees to see the forest. But you wouldn't have needed any REFUSE lines if you had followed my suggestion and just extracted the ports you wanted. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 02:41:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6F44C7 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 02:41:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CAD5F5F for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 02:41:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:41:36 -0800 Message-ID: <50E4EFDD.5010801@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 21:41:33 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Walter Hurry Subject: Re: using /etc/portsnap.conf References: <50E46E0D.5030202@a1poweruser.com> <50E4C628.8050207@a1poweruser.com> <50E4D9A7.8070604@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jan 2013 02:41:38.0016 (UTC) FILETIME=[DA774E00:01CDE95B] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 02:41:37 -0000 Walter Hurry wrote: > On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 20:06:47 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > >> Thanks that was it. >> Sometimes your to close to the trees to see the forest. > > But you wouldn't have needed any REFUSE lines if you had followed my > suggestion and just extracted the ports you wanted. > > After doing portsnap fetch for the first time followed by "portsnap extract mis/ytree" will create an /usr/ports directory empty of the files and directories needed for the "make" command to function. But yes the /usr/ports/misc/ytree port will be there. But having a /etc/portsnap.conf with REFUSE statements for all of the ports categories will populate /usr/port directory with only the files and directories required for the "make" command to function correctly. In csup this was called the "base" category which could be selected separately in the same way other ports could be selected separately. But it's good to know that I can duplicate what I was doing with csup now with portsnap to have a ports tree trimmed to only the things required by "make" and the few major ports that I needed to recompile to change the defaults used in the packaged versions. And to address the dependents question. I used pkg_add -r to install the dependents and the "make install" compiled without any problems. So thanks for your pointer to "portsnap extract mis/ytree". It took some testing to figure out things because the man portsnap is not very clear about what is really happening. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 02:59:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92EB74B for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 02:59:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from smtpauth22.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpauth22.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B62B5FD9 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 02:59:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4672 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2013 02:53:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (209.180.213.209) by smtpauth22.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.44) with ESMTP; 03 Jan 2013 02:53:03 -0000 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:53:05 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: somewhat OT ... in parts Message-ID: <20130103025305.GA24960@ethic.thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 02:59:44 -0000 guys, it was bill joy and friends who clued me in on how-to use the vi that he was writing in the late 70's. I've been stuck on that editor--or VIIM in recent years. Bill's original editor became COPYRIGHT of UNIX {TM}, and of course you just didnt mess with "the telephone company." I was glad when keith bostic wrote an exact clone of bill joy's editor. I'm still getting used to vim. one reason ive stuck with vim-as-vi was of the colors that vim defaults to. I'v fought the dark/crap/puke brown / color that seems to be the default on my linux desktop. it's hard to see my block cursor when I search for words. und`zo, today I spend a couple hours tracking down this color feature in vim. was pleased to find that there was a blue-tone color set. my joints are complaining so I'll ask if any of you can give me the right terms to google for. I'd like to find a lighter blue or play around with the colors. {am assuming that vim is the same across the linux and berkeley distributions.} thanks in advance for a few url's. gary PS: OH; the offtopic thing. I'm done, or =very= close with my voice by computer program. It's in C with gtk and AFAICT works only on linux. ive got a few months of cleaning up before release 0.51 will be finished. in the FBSD world, this would fit into the accessibility directory. now, the speech-impaired who can type will be able to communicate with anyone. VBC requires espeak and gvim. -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Twenty-six years of service to the Unix community. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 04:25:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264D1FE6 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 04:25:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joji@eskimo.com) Received: from ultra7.eskimo.com (ultra7.eskimo.com [204.122.16.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7EA22E7 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 04:25:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shellx.eskimo.com (root@shellx.eskimo.com [204.122.16.5]) by ultra7.eskimo.com (8.14.0/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r034J5KJ015306 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 20:19:06 -0800 Received: from shellx.eskimo.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shellx.eskimo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r034JBGP032664 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 20:19:11 -0800 Received: (from joji@localhost) by shellx.eskimo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id r034JBBq032663 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 20:19:11 -0800 Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 20:19:11 -0800 From: Joseph Olatt To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: audio/baresip on FreeBSD 9 Message-ID: <20130103041911.GA29654@shellx.eskimo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 04:25:15 -0000 I've been trying to get baresip to work on my FreeBSD 9.x laptop and haven't had much success. I register successfully to callcentric.com and it appears that I can connect and there is a stream of data coming through based on the status display: [0:00:08] audio=0/0 (bit/s) [ ] However, there is no sound. Is anybody on the list successfully using baresip? If so, could they please provide some pointers on how to get sound? There doesn't seem to be much documentation anywhere on the Internet for baresip. My config file (~/.baresip/config) is: /* Begin ~/.baresip/config */ # # baresip configuration # #------------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Core poll_method poll # poll, select, epoll .. # Input input_device /dev/event0 input_port 5555 # SIP sip_trans_bsize 128 #sip_listen 127.0.0.1:5050 # Audio audio_dev /dev/audio0.0 audio_srate 8000-48000 audio_channels 1-2 #audio_aec_length 128 # [ms] # Video video_dev video_size 352x288 video_bitrate 384000 video_fps 25 #video_selfview window # {window,pip} # AVT - Audio/Video Transport rtp_tos 184 #rtp_ports 10000-20000 #rtp_bandwidth 512-1024 # [kbit/s] rtcp_enable yes rtcp_mux no jitter_buffer_delay 5-10 # frames # Network #dns_server 10.0.0.1:53 #------------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Modules module_path /usr/local/lib/baresip/modules # UI Modules module stdio.so module cons.so #module evdev.so # Audio codec Modules (in order) #module g7221.so #module g722.so module g711.so #module gsm.so #module l16.so #module speex.so #module celt.so #module bv32.so # Audio filter Modules (in order) # NOTE: AEC should be before Preproc #module sndfile.so #module speex_aec.so #module speex_pp.so #module speex_resamp.so #module plc.so # Audio driver Modules #module oss.so #module alsa.so #module portaudio.so #module gst.so # Video codec Modules (in order) module avcodec.so #module vpx.so # Video source modules #module avformat.so #module v4l.so #module v4l2.so # Video display modules #module sdl.so #module x11.so # Media NAT modules #module stun.so #module turn.so #module ice.so # Media encoding modules #module srtp.so # Other modules #module natbd.so #------------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Module parameters # Speex codec parameters speex_quality 7 # 0-10 speex_complexity 7 # 0-10 speex_enhancement 0 # 0-1 speex_vbr 0 # Variable Bit Rate 0-1 speex_vad 0 # Voice Activity Detection 0-1 speex_agc_level 8000 # NAT Behavior Discovery #natbd_server creytiv.com #natbd_interval 600 # in seconds /* End ~/.baresip/config */ /* uname -a */ FreeBSD peace 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #4 r244062: Mon Dec 10 17:56:25 CST 2012 root@peace:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PEACE i386 Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 06:02:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EEF4921 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 06:02:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from solarcollectorwindow@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gh0-f194.google.com (mail-gh0-f194.google.com [209.85.160.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30DB711 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 06:02:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-gh0-f194.google.com with SMTP id f14so1022096ghb.9 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:02:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:from:subject:to:content-type:mime-version :organization:date; bh=4pxKGF3S5Vuit88KqDXSz1DtESIKWsK0cFtschqknHU=; b=uhOiVIn8pHHQdetVvm+yClTAIOiT/GX0DnfTI+639skpEiN7G2rFOhVzY0qdbRWckH azhwTtiOR7K93T3BpAr7tletSHo58NsVI63zEScV5S0cwCU78PMNxSdUwEbN+r/GC1WZ nr8jbrASPtwt4V/LbF+btaFLQxz5D1k/IH8jCzxAqPLvUjqOrfcah39YWx28UQ5Y7X62 IBtgk5TtUB8gR5DpAutzKvkvApcxNVVTDYORYfkdzI9WgbsqXY3Z1ZUWA6Q0+BvB+X7e 5FxNxJLEIwHIw24kDB50af7GEcbn7glhsbJzhMfbjUM2otGZfXXk/4YXUWwNu+aret8F ufOg== X-Received: by 10.100.82.5 with SMTP id f5mr14047342anb.20.1357189881521; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 21:11:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from 75-1-102-116.lightspeed.snantx.sbcglobal.net (75-1-102-116.lightspeed.snantx.sbcglobal.net. [75.1.102.116]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l14sm23880308anm.15.2013.01.02.21.11.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Jan 2013 21:11:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50e512f8.0e6d650a.67a9.56bf@mx.google.com> From: Keith Roberts Subject: Solar Collector Windows - US Air Force Approved To: "questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: Solar Collector Windows Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 23:10:47 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 06:02:59 -0000 =EF=BB=BFSolar Window=20 =20 Solar Collecter Windows (Interior Mounted) - University Tested and Sol= ar Rejector Windows all in one=20 =20 A 4' X 4' In'Flector window insulator can produce as much heat as a 60= 0 watt electrical heater per sunlight hour and reflect up to 72% of th= e room heat back into the room! During the summer, our product reduce= s air infiltration up to 71%, stops solar heat gain up to 65%, and blo= cks up to 90% of harmful UV rays for such customers as General Motors = and numerous Canadian Embassies! We would like you to consider offeri= ng your customers truly energy efficient window insulators, roller bli= nds, vertical blinds, or sliders. At the same time, we would like you = to be a supplier, distributor or manufacturer by adding another produc= t line for your customers to consider! We have been tested by two maj= or universities with outstanding results and we are located in the Uni= ted States, Canada, Mexico, the UK, Ireland, Italy, Pakistan, Hong Kon= g, Dubai, and Australia! =20 Energy Efficiency Done Right invites you to a webinar with information= on chances in manufacturing or being a dealer of In'Flector See Thr= ough Radiant Barrier Window and Skylight Insulators. The webinar will = take place on Tuesday, January 22nd at 10:00AM (CST) The energy effici= ency industry is projected to be a 40 billion dollar industry by the y= ear 2012, and a good portion of those funds should be dedicated to imp= roving the least energy efficient envelope component-the windows. If y= ou need more information please reply to this email. If you want to be= a part of this webinar please email back this information- your name,= your business, your location, the market you desire to serve, your em= ail and a phone number. This is a true groundfloor chance in a fast gr= owing industry. Thank you for your consideration =20 Unsubscribe by email Inflector Window Insulators 10854 Lake Path Drive San Antonio, TX 78217 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 06:03:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B673A9C2 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 06:03:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from basarevych@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f176.google.com (mail-qc0-f176.google.com [209.85.216.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83747728 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 06:03:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id n41so7677566qco.7 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:03:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6u873oEVWsMOVccQNu67JfUgxohNG/BC9Jnw3cpEg5k=; b=xwncAnjjEk/ZVcDZDlfnXXkarLTE0aC9y2YRCA8w0Nl8SAWR/73ZxTud1n96mi/aci bhkOBt84RzVXnuHiKI1AIJCapUj8twAL2XFs5qaU+r/Ix5seeOinrKQfMLKdiC0sutgk cigs/jgzayRdVfvfI61jw7Tfdr+nyFvwoC1rqG9axJRh1cYuWAuWlwuwabj2k0K4z7M2 kcCINZx2tbkgbwdM87GJz+HrBnf6UX4Kb5Rq51uSxUiYrx2PyLx1q7zpnIbQS9S1Afin U5Ldge4WHB72l0Xnn7kPafMeSBh1l4UctKfLyjkiK5y/FmgVlBkNPVIcR0QktNMPmtSI 6hCQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.183.147 with SMTP id cg19mr25131552qab.16.1357193022934; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:03:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.105.130 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 22:03:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:03:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Skype video chat? From: Ross To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 06:03:49 -0000 Hello. Can you please recommend a webcam and microphone that will work in skype under FreeBSD? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 06:08:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF684A98 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 06:08:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB2C674A for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 06:08:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A299C3CC0F; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 07:08:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r0368Px8001958; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 07:08:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 07:08:25 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Fbsd8 Subject: Re: using /etc/portsnap.conf Message-Id: <20130103070825.47e87a83.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <50E46E0D.5030202@a1poweruser.com> References: <50E46E0D.5030202@a1poweruser.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 06:08:24 -0000 On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:27:41 -0500, Fbsd8 wrote: > When issuing the portsnap command will it automatically > read the /etc/portsnap.conf file or is the -f option mandatory? Judging from "man portsnap", the file will be read automatically at start unless you specify a -f file. -f conffile Read the configuration from conffile. (default: /etc/portsnap.conf) See "man portsnap" for reference. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 06:14:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E13B49 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 06:14:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B4E763 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 06:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D892B3CB76; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 07:14:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r036ETAM001994; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 07:14:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 07:14:29 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Walter Hurry Subject: Re: using /etc/portsnap.conf Message-Id: <20130103071429.07bbcb6e.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <50E46E0D.5030202@a1poweruser.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 06:14:28 -0000 On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:24:14 +0000 (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote: > By the way, in answer to your question in another thread, you don't have > to extract the whole tree if you don't want to. Use 'portsnap fetch' the > first time around, and then portsnap extract the port you want. See 'man > portsnap', and remember to cater for the dependencies. This is correct and works in many many situations. However, there has been a saying which states that "only a complete ports tree is guaranteed to work properly"; I think this basically refers to the availability of dependencies and turtles all the way down, plus the top level files (such as /usr/ports/Makefile) and the Mk/ and Tools/ subtrees. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 06:27:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14645D72 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 06:27:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B0B7D4 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 06:27:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D74C3CC06; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 07:27:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r036Rf22002325; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 07:27:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 07:27:41 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Gary Kline Subject: Re: somewhat OT ... in parts Message-Id: <20130103072741.c02a1150.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20130103025305.GA24960@ethic.thought.org> References: <20130103025305.GA24960@ethic.thought.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 06:27:41 -0000 On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:53:05 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > one reason ive stuck with vim-as-vi was of the colors that vim > defaults to. I'v fought the dark/crap/puke brown / > color that seems to be the default on my linux desktop. it's hard > to see my block cursor when I search for words. und`zo, today I > spend a couple hours tracking down this color feature in vim. was > pleased to find that there was a blue-tone color set. my joints > are complaining so I'll ask if any of you can give me the right > terms to google for. I'd like to find a lighter blue or play > around with the colors. {am assuming that vim is the same across > the linux and berkeley distributions.} In case you're using gvim (a GUI "enclosing" for vim) you can do the following: Load some text or source code, :syntax on, then in the menu: Edit -> Color Scheme, and pin the resulting menu next to the editor window; click the different schemes to check if one of the predefined 17 schemes looks usable to you; when done, unpin the menu. This approach is just for testing and "looking around" in the first place, not for actual permanent use. :-) > PS: OH; the offtopic thing. I'm done, or =very= close with my > voice by computer program. It's in C with gtk and AFAICT works > only on linux. ive got a few months of cleaning up before > release 0.51 will be finished. in the FBSD world, this would > fit into the accessibility directory. now, the speech-impaired > who can type will be able to communicate with anyone. VBC requires > espeak and gvim. There are both gvim and /usr/ports/audio/espeak in ports, and Gtk is also in there. What would cause this software to refuse working on FreeBSD? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 07:07:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F64488 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 07:07:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE56418D for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 07:07:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.204.130.203] (helo=tiny.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TqetU-00087g-F0 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 08:07:13 +0100 Received: from tiny.Sisis.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r0377AQx001227 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:07:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id r037797i001226 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:07:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: tiny.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:07:09 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Skype video chat? Message-ID: <20130103070709.GA1219@tiny.Sisis.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r226986 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.130.203 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 07:07:21 -0000 El día Thursday, January 03, 2013 a las 08:03:42AM +0200, Ross escribió: > Hello. > > Can you please recommend a webcam and microphone that will work in > skype under FreeBSD? Hello, See http://wiki.freebsd.org/WebcamCompat matthias -- Sent from my FreeBSD netbook Matthias Apitz | - No system with backdoors like Apple/Android E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | - Respect for open standards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 07:15:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7824591 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 07:15:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576AF1C4 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 07:15:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.204.130.203] (helo=tiny.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tqf1k-0008GW-Nj for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 08:15:45 +0100 Received: from tiny.Sisis.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r037Fg98001254 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:15:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id r037FgbD001253 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:15:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: tiny.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:15:41 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: audio/baresip on FreeBSD 9 Message-ID: <20130103071541.GB1219@tiny.Sisis.de> References: <20130103041911.GA29654@shellx.eskimo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20130103041911.GA29654@shellx.eskimo.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r226986 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.130.203 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 07:15:46 -0000 --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, El día Wednesday, January 02, 2013 a las 08:19:11PM -0800, Joseph Olatt escribió: > > I've been trying to get baresip to work on my FreeBSD 9.x laptop and > haven't had much success. I register successfully to callcentric.com and > it appears that I can connect and there is a stream of data coming > through based on the status display: > > [0:00:08] audio=0/0 (bit/s) [ ] The display shows zero audio data! > However, there is no sound. Have you tried the local audio loop with pressing the single letter 'a'? > Is anybody on the list successfully using baresip? If so, could they > please provide some pointers on how to get sound? I'm attaching my config file which works fine; in your config file it looks stange to me: > # Audio > audio_dev /dev/audio0.0 do you have such a device file '/dev/audio0.0'? > # Audio codec Modules (in order) > #module g7221.so > #module g722.so > module g711.so > #module gsm.so > #module l16.so > #module speex.so > #module celt.so > #module bv32.so > > # Audio filter Modules (in order) > # NOTE: AEC should be before Preproc > #module sndfile.so > #module speex_aec.so > #module speex_pp.so > #module speex_resamp.so > #module plc.so > > # Audio driver Modules > #module oss.so > #module alsa.so > #module portaudio.so > #module gst.so you have no audio driver loaded, try 'oss.so' Once you get the local loop working you could contact me off-list for my SIP and try to call me. HIH matthias -- Sent from my FreeBSD netbook Matthias Apitz | - No system with backdoors like Apple/Android E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | - Respect for open standards --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=config # # baresip configuration # #------------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Core poll_method poll # poll, select, epoll .. # Input input_device /dev/event0 input_port 5555 # SIP sip_trans_bsize 128 #sip_listen 127.0.0.1:5050 # Audio audio_dev /dev/dsp audio_srate 8000-48000 audio_channels 1-2 #audio_aec_length 128 # [ms] # Video video_dev /dev/video0 video_size 352x288 video_bitrate 384000 video_fps 25 #video_selfview window # {window,pip} # AVT - Audio/Video Transport rtp_tos 184 #rtp_ports 10000-20000 rtp_ports 1024-1030 #rtp_bandwidth 512-1024 # [kbit/s] rtcp_enable yes rtcp_mux no jitter_buffer_delay 5-10 # frames # Network #dns_server 10.0.0.1:53 #------------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Modules module_path /usr/local/lib/baresip/modules # UI Modules module stdio.so module cons.so #module evdev.so # Audio codec Modules (in order) #module g7221.so #module g722.so module g711.so #module gsm.so #module l16.so #module speex.so #module celt.so #module bv32.so # Audio filter Modules (in order) # NOTE: AEC should be before Preproc #module sndfile.so #module speex_aec.so #module speex_pp.so #module speex_resamp.so #module plc.so # Audio driver Modules module oss.so #module alsa.so #module portaudio.so #module gst.so # Video codec Modules (in order) module avcodec.so #module vpx.so # Video source modules module v4l2.so #module avformat.so #module v4l.so # Video display modules module x11.so # module sdl.so # Media NAT modules module stun.so module turn.so module ice.so # Media encoding modules #module srtp.so # Other modules #module natbd.so #------------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Module parameters # Speex codec parameters speex_quality 7 # 0-10 speex_complexity 7 # 0-10 speex_enhancement 0 # 0-1 speex_vbr 0 # Variable Bit Rate 0-1 speex_vad 0 # Voice Activity Detection 0-1 speex_agc_level 8000 # NAT Behavior Discovery natbd_server creytiv.com natbd_interval 600 # in seconds --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 08:39:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A1826F for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:39:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8C66A8 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r038QmKQ029429; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:26:48 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <50E540C8.2040808@qeng-ho.org> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 08:26:48 +0000 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ASV Subject: Re: just a curiosity about auth.conf References: <1357043607.2063.13.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> In-Reply-To: <1357043607.2063.13.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 08:39:23 -0000 On 01/01/13 12:33, ASV wrote: > Good afternoon and happy new year to everybody. > > I'm just curious about auth.conf. > > According to the detailed release notes > (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.1R/relnotes-detailed.html): > "auth.conf(5) has been removed because it was deprecated years > ago.[r238481]" > > but according to the man pages online AUTH.CONF(5) of FBSD9.0-RELEASE: > "auth.conf contains various attributes important to the authentication > code, most notably crypt(3) for the time being. This documentation will > be updated as the /etc/auth.conf file, which is very new, evolves.". > > How can something deprecated years ago being new and evolving quickly > enough to require further doc updates? Am I missing something? :) Looks like the man page hasn't been updated in a while. If you're not yet on 9.1, and look at auth.conf itself it says in the header comments # Configure some authentication-related defaults. This file is being # gradually subsumed by user class and PAM configuration. I.e. it is/was an old way of doing things that has been replaced by newer mechanisms. Personally I'm glad to see the team clearing out the cruft. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 08:50:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3979E5D1 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:50:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from server6.mbg.se (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:28:60a::106]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92188737 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:50:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org ([195.216.53.111]) (authenticated bits=0) by server6.mbg.se (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r038opaC095467 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 09:50:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Message-ID: <50E54666.4060407@eskk.nu> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:50:46 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Which k3b is recommended? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.7 required=7.0 tests=RDNS_NONE, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on server6.mbg.se X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 08:50:55 -0000 I need k3b on a newly installed 9.1-RELEASE system. I wonder if I miss out on some functionality if I go with version without KDE? I use XFCE4 as my Desktop. Thanks /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 09:54:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0ED8AA1 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 09:54:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-da0-f49.google.com (mail-da0-f49.google.com [209.85.210.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A4BD3B for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 09:54:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-da0-f49.google.com with SMTP id v40so6878738dad.8 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 01:54:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=x3Iu5gmVHl6P/oQFnC2/L8eMC7pRmciTOxOjFDVfgDc=; b=Xw1ZH5Y9qnFBFjx7Ylr+dzcYvEGFnJusixMNxhH3U0ojmD2IAqqktWLkLMK6UyjaDz 3bkVN1jFD8aKa5bAWCimyvtGNE9bCyotQV8F8ABYai8WBJNOg7sMf6Ncuw/UtS3irbeo p9fMQc3mPnfLiXnc5ZsRBKalOKZOPCGBBwgj9zUsr2+4xM2pkY6RTsDE5b6d2onVMR+e fwFBH8dWaPP7u1DYMaiEoBTuGv0/9C0ggNcTRqc/yRdBGizrn2NFtputNFjqs2KNITuo 9to+kLrsC/al7ADKLzYFRL3Axw0QuuWbhfnfCgH3p6duTOWlrqnkSJm77ge5ESBZiHlT MBLw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.82.162 with SMTP id j2mr144459656pay.13.1357206879958; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 01:54:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.218.134 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 01:54:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130102073536.3c4d4f29@tech304.office.supranet.net> References: <50E3F07E.7000507@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20130102073536.3c4d4f29@tech304.office.supranet.net> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 10:54:39 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD: GIT instaed of SVN? From: David Demelier To: Mark Felder Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:54:40 -0000 subversion is not in base and will probably never? So this is not a real problem :) 2013/1/2 Mark Felder > Git is also not BSD licensed. I believe it may require bringing Python > into base as well. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Demelier David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 10:20:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C44D5D for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 10:20:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com (mail-la0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53207DE3 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 10:20:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id fp12so7606533lab.27 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 02:20:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=E8O7ZPSygAhtTl+JDuSrTuRjlJNvrhEejZI4HUZT9Ec=; b=rbwNbTUc6xE7RDWk53rz4vyvol3rNLo1vEQgXtUrfQNrRCTROEt8zUOLwR83WGSJrc rpUjbFVjF5e+HsRT+PKTJw/QqGPM3uaFYFB6gI59CG6G31S9GRGW5UUDwuASpxeLEW+9 2ssHupYK1mI3ziJ8oitzIOY07QffX+XBbtFaZRh1pjDVrguSo569SY9konfujixiMdfB Iaqp+O4B9yvsp8LQer1uerCh2Ja4EtmQ1AZPAQxojIS3YJWKIN4n3KBr78u1bXtnyXH6 OzomY/fZm8ZYQtt/8IP8DQF2g7jBsyuFZcVm8NrS47/OCAz5HtrwT/e2+AdYnzSkqjcb a7lg== X-Received: by 10.152.104.240 with SMTP id gh16mr46998194lab.56.1357208408840; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 02:20:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.130] (mau.donbass.com. [92.242.127.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fh4sm16841076lbb.7.2013.01.03.02.20.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Jan 2013 02:20:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50E55B4B.4000308@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:19:55 +0200 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Demelier Subject: Re: FreeBSD: GIT instaed of SVN? References: <50E3F07E.7000507@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20130102073536.3c4d4f29@tech304.office.supranet.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mark Felder , "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:20:10 -0000 03.01.2013 11:54, David Demelier: > subversion is not in base and will probably never? So this is not a real > problem :) Nope, importing svnsup would suffice. http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/user/des/svnsup/ -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 12:28:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80851C58 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:28:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from mail.feld.me (mail.feld.me [66.170.3.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3901337F for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:28:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=C7cgCXRfEl6gPH0KIyVC6kKGIwPWRSWed5iHMbdZWqY=; b=e1seER1Vw1afVS1me6I11WXa47oL0RzkWoJ9sV0kJ0COvy1JJaj/2kpSz2DcW1k9PwQUMJPTwKr8P/fT6cLVPVov9JyjUhfu8XyCEi1T4UpwCzc4dVQ7BN7jtR8AfhVj; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by mail.feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1TqjuF-0007Eu-NB; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 06:28:20 -0600 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1357216093-27448-27447/5/1; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:28:13 +0000 Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 06:28:12 -0600 From: Mark Felder To: Volodymyr Kostyrko Subject: Re: FreeBSD: GIT instaed of SVN? Message-Id: <20130103062812.1d7fbe0e@tech304.office.supranet.net> In-Reply-To: <50E55B4B.4000308@gmail.com> References: <50E3F07E.7000507@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20130102073536.3c4d4f29@tech304.office.supranet.net> <50E55B4B.4000308@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) X-SA-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, KHOP_THREADED=-0.5 X-SA-Score: -1.5 Cc: David Demelier , "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:28:26 -0000 On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:19:55 +0200 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > Nope, importing svnsup would suffice. > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/user/des/svnsup/ As far as I know that's not a completed project. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 12:40:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15768F02 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:40:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com (mail-bk0-f46.google.com [209.85.214.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753B363E for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:40:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f46.google.com with SMTP id q16so6577131bkw.5 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 04:40:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XWENd+qIrcgc6qY/Eiol3pQObSRv9Nbk4DeWLDVXzM8=; b=OKjlUeiDyDh9cpqwQJlckoPgniPqtorFQUcoll3TlK490akSyE9a5I+/LJL4hrjUrU nzqSkqncY/tdV4e7mnF57boNPDN2b2Z5QA7TQ/4psQFWlA34nXuADD3q1ox+w6MKfnwZ 4lsQcE99OI47wwv6TYNp7bRpItNdcd9BYuzJY6pEIHxGEvOEOB/3NXLHDr9KMHfBsVSU T8K+WGzmLRJB16cSTDRk+YUEzPAqdFlapSOOprxjdJmOmmByJNyacMlpAhGybOtVoqTQ feMlCzj6zdLZCFG61vcSJtNqgMiQkgXOQECn7gJDqdqGS48vHdckmCYLz6/cmxIY9egj +t3w== X-Received: by 10.204.147.8 with SMTP id j8mr24288211bkv.105.1357216842626; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 04:40:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r16sm33683206bkv.3.2013.01.03.04.40.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Jan 2013 04:40:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:40:38 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD: GIT instaed of SVN? Message-ID: <20130103124038.0fe30596@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <50E55B4B.4000308@gmail.com> References: <50E3F07E.7000507@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20130102073536.3c4d4f29@tech304.office.supranet.net> <50E55B4B.4000308@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:40:50 -0000 On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:19:55 +0200 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > 03.01.2013 11:54, David Demelier: > > subversion is not in base and will probably never? So this is not a > > real problem :) > > Nope, importing svnsup would suffice. > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/user/des/svnsup/ Even that isn't essential, cvsup was used from ports for years before csup was written. And now we have portsnap, freebsd-update and pkg. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 12:57:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C73F16F for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:57:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@martinlaabs.de) Received: from relay02.alfahosting-server.de (relay02.alfahosting-server.de [109.237.142.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266A96D7 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:57:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by relay02.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 499B332C0E97; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:57:10 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-DCC: : X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 Received: from alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de (alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de [109.237.140.30]) by relay02.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC77732C0E96 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:57:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from pc.martinlaabs.de (p54B34C1B.dip.t-dialin.net [84.179.76.27]) by alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8B68515C179 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:57:08 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50E58023.9050000@martinlaabs.de> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:57:07 +0100 From: Martin Laabs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Build linux,ko kernel module standalone X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Status: No X-Virus-Checker-Version: clamassassin 1.2.4 with ClamAV 0.97.3/16321/Thu Jan 3 11:39:17 2013 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:57:19 -0000 Hello, if I wanna build a kernel module standalone (without the kernel e.g. for testing) I do it the following way (wlan in this example): cd /usr/src/sys/modules/wlan make all maybe make install if I wanna install it. Now I want do build the linux.ko module with the symbol DEBUG defined and tried the following: cd /usr/src/sys/modules/linux make -DDEBUG all but unfortunately this ends up with: cc -c -O2 -pipe -march=athlon64 -DCOMPAT_FREEBSD32 -DCOMPAT_LINUX32 -fno-strict-aliasing -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-sse -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mno-mmx -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -fstack-protector -std=iso9899:1999 -fstack-protector -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -Wmissing-include-dirs -fdiagnostics-show-option /usr/src/sys/modules/linux/../../amd64/linux32/linux32_genassym.c In file included from ./machine/param.h:46, from @/sys/param.h:115, from /usr/src/sys/modules/linux/../../amd64/linux32/linux32_genassym.c:4: ./machine/_align.h:6:24: error: x86/_align.h: No such file or directory Building the module insinde a make buildkernel works fine - so there are actually no missing files. Do you have any ideas what I'am missing? Thank you, Martin Laabs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 13:50:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F62486 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:50:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rodperson@rodperson.com) Received: from www6.pairlite.com (www6.pairlite.com [64.130.10.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CBDD910 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:50:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from unknown (unknown-ip-614.ccbh.upmc.edu [128.147.110.113]) by www6.pairlite.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C132367AF3; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:44:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:44:22 -0500 From: Rod Person To: Gary Kline Subject: Re: somewhat OT ... in parts Message-ID: <20130103084422.00004eac.rodperson@rodperson.com> In-Reply-To: <20130103025305.GA24960@ethic.thought.org> References: <20130103025305.GA24960@ethic.thought.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0cvs30 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:50:40 -0000 On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:53:05 -0800 Gary Kline wrote: > > thanks in advance for a few url's. > I love this color scheme, I use it for everything. There is a vim specific version...http://ethanschoonover.com/solarized -- Just because it can been done, does not mean it should be done. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 14:05:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2260F860 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 14:05:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hugo@barafranca.com) Received: from mail.barafranca.com (mail.barafranca.com [67.213.67.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F0B99F for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 14:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [172.16.100.24]) by mail.barafranca.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C0A98F; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:53:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at barafranca.com Received: from mail.barafranca.com ([172.16.100.24]) by localhost (mail.barafranca.com [172.16.100.24]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JEoED8U4wjBQ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:52:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.1] (i152203.upc-i.chello.nl [62.195.152.203]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.barafranca.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CFC2B982; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:52:23 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <50E58D05.2090408@barafranca.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:52:05 +0000 From: Hugo Silva User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joseph Olatt Subject: Re: audio/baresip on FreeBSD 9 References: <20130103041911.GA29654@shellx.eskimo.com> In-Reply-To: <20130103041911.GA29654@shellx.eskimo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 14:05:12 -0000 On 01/03/13 04:19, Joseph Olatt wrote: > > I've been trying to get baresip to work on my FreeBSD 9.x laptop and > haven't had much success. I register successfully to callcentric.com and > it appears that I can connect and there is a stream of data coming > through based on the status display: > > [0:00:08] audio=0/0 (bit/s) [ ] > > However, there is no sound. > > Is anybody on the list successfully using baresip? If so, could they > please provide some pointers on how to get sound? > > There doesn't seem to be much documentation anywhere on the Internet for > baresip. > > My config file (~/.baresip/config) is: > > /* Begin ~/.baresip/config */ > # > # baresip configuration > # > > #------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > # Core > poll_method poll # poll, select, epoll .. > > # Input > input_device /dev/event0 > input_port 5555 > > # SIP > sip_trans_bsize 128 > #sip_listen 127.0.0.1:5050 > > # Audio > audio_dev /dev/audio0.0 > audio_srate 8000-48000 > audio_channels 1-2 > #audio_aec_length 128 # [ms] > > # Video > video_dev > video_size 352x288 > video_bitrate 384000 > video_fps 25 > #video_selfview window # {window,pip} > > # AVT - Audio/Video Transport > rtp_tos 184 > #rtp_ports 10000-20000 > #rtp_bandwidth 512-1024 # [kbit/s] > rtcp_enable yes > rtcp_mux no > jitter_buffer_delay 5-10 # frames > > # Network > #dns_server 10.0.0.1:53 > > #------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > # Modules > > module_path /usr/local/lib/baresip/modules > > # UI Modules > module stdio.so > module cons.so > #module evdev.so > > # Audio codec Modules (in order) > #module g7221.so > #module g722.so > module g711.so > #module gsm.so > #module l16.so > #module speex.so > #module celt.so > #module bv32.so > > # Audio filter Modules (in order) > # NOTE: AEC should be before Preproc > #module sndfile.so > #module speex_aec.so > #module speex_pp.so > #module speex_resamp.so > #module plc.so > > # Audio driver Modules > #module oss.so > #module alsa.so > #module portaudio.so > #module gst.so > > # Video codec Modules (in order) > module avcodec.so > #module vpx.so > > # Video source modules > #module avformat.so > #module v4l.so > #module v4l2.so > > # Video display modules > #module sdl.so > #module x11.so > > # Media NAT modules > #module stun.so > #module turn.so > #module ice.so > > # Media encoding modules > #module srtp.so > > # Other modules > #module natbd.so > > #------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > # Module parameters > > > # Speex codec parameters > speex_quality 7 # 0-10 > speex_complexity 7 # 0-10 > speex_enhancement 0 # 0-1 > speex_vbr 0 # Variable Bit Rate 0-1 > speex_vad 0 # Voice Activity Detection 0-1 > speex_agc_level 8000 > > # NAT Behavior Discovery > #natbd_server creytiv.com > #natbd_interval 600 # in seconds > /* End ~/.baresip/config */ > > > /* uname -a */ > FreeBSD peace 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #4 r244062: Mon Dec > 10 17:56:25 CST 2012 root@peace:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PEACE i386 > > > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > This works for me (not sure about video, works with video loop but have not found a free sip server that supports video streams..): # # baresip configuration # #------------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Core poll_method select # poll, select, epoll .. # Input input_device /dev/event0 input_port 5555 # SIP sip_trans_bsize 128 #sip_listen 127.0.0.1:5050 # Audio audio_dev /dev/dsp audio_srate 8000-48000 audio_channels 1-2 audio_aec_length 128 # [ms] # Video video_dev /dev/video0 video_size 800x600 video_bitrate 384000 video_fps 25 video_selfview window # {window,pip} # AVT - Audio/Video Transport rtp_tos 184 #rtp_ports 10000-20000 #rtp_bandwidth 512-1024 # [kbit/s] rtcp_enable yes rtcp_mux no jitter_buffer_delay 5-10 # frames # Network #dns_server 10.0.0.1:53 #------------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Modules module_path /usr/local/lib/baresip/modules # UI Modules module stdio.so module cons.so #module evdev.so # Audio codec Modules (in order) #module g7221.so #module g722.so #module gsm.so #module l16.so #module speex.so module g711.so #module celt.so #module bv32.so # Audio filter Modules (in order) # NOTE: AEC should be before Preproc #module sndfile.so #module speex_aec.so #module speex_pp.so #module speex_resamp.so #module plc.so # Audio driver Modules #module oss.so #module alsa.so module portaudio.so # ^^ this enabled SOUND #module gst.so # Video codec Modules (in order) module avcodec.so module vpx.so # Video source modules #module avformat.so #module v4l.so module v4l2.so # ^^ this enabled VIDEO # Video display modules #module sdl.so module x11.so # Media NAT modules #module stun.so #module turn.so #module ice.so # Media encoding modules module srtp.so # Other modules #module natbd.so #------------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Module parameters # Speex codec parameters speex_quality 3 # 0-10 speex_complexity 7 # 0-10 speex_enhancement 1 # 0-1 speex_vbr 1 # Variable Bit Rate 0-1 speex_vad 1 # Voice Activity Detection 0-1 speex_agc_level 38000 # NAT Behavior Discovery natbd_server creytiv.com natbd_interval 600 # in seconds From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 14:50:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33875901 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 14:50:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@martinlaabs.de) Received: from relay02.alfahosting-server.de (relay02.alfahosting-server.de [109.237.142.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66C6CF0 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 14:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by relay02.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 25ED532C02E6; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 15:50:48 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-DCC: : X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 Received: from alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de (alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de [109.237.140.30]) by relay02.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4402F32C02D6 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 15:50:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from pc.martinlaabs.de (p54B34C1B.dip.t-dialin.net [84.179.76.27]) by alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0DCFB515C179 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 15:50:45 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50E59AC4.5020203@martinlaabs.de> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:50:44 +0100 From: Martin Laabs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update: fale? References: <20130102002110.GA7209@whisperer.chthonixia.net> In-Reply-To: <20130102002110.GA7209@whisperer.chthonixia.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Status: No X-Virus-Checker-Version: clamassassin 1.2.4 with ClamAV 0.97.3/16323/Thu Jan 3 13:39:19 2013 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 14:50:56 -0000 Hi, On 01/02/13 01:21, Joe Altman wrote: > Greetings, list. I have the following error; though I can load > update5.FreeBSD.org in a browser: > [...] maybe you use a release that is not supported by freebsd-update. Run "uname -r" an compare the release with that you see when looking at http://update4.freebsd.org/ If it is not there you can not use freebsd-update. Best regards, Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 14:51:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72CEB998 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 14:51:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@martinlaabs.de) Received: from relay02.alfahosting-server.de (relay02.alfahosting-server.de [109.237.142.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FE8CFA for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 14:51:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by relay02.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5371F32C02F6; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 15:51:11 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-DCC: : X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 Received: from alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de (alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de [109.237.140.30]) by relay02.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6879B32C02F6 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 15:51:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from pc.martinlaabs.de (p54B34C1B.dip.t-dialin.net [84.179.76.27]) by alfa3018.alfahosting-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39122515C3E1 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 15:51:09 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50E59ADB.5040300@martinlaabs.de> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:51:07 +0100 From: Martin Laabs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update: fale? References: <20130102002110.GA7209@whisperer.chthonixia.net> In-Reply-To: <20130102002110.GA7209@whisperer.chthonixia.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Status: No X-Virus-Checker-Version: clamassassin 1.2.4 with ClamAV 0.97.3/16323/Thu Jan 3 13:39:19 2013 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 14:51:17 -0000 Hi, On 01/02/13 01:21, Joe Altman wrote: > Greetings, list. I have the following error; though I can load > update5.FreeBSD.org in a browser: > [...] maybe you use a release that is not supported by freebsd-update. Run "uname -r" an compare the release with that you see when looking at http://update4.freebsd.org/ If it is not there you can not use freebsd-update. Best regards, Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 16:24:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA31ED0E for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 16:24:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrm@ftfl.ca) Received: from mail-la0-f51.google.com (mail-la0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B820218 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 16:24:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f51.google.com with SMTP id fj20so8247560lab.38 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 08:24:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ftfl.ca; s=google; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wP83mQA0gMb64vr096/W93zCylRUkOricIgyLEzQR7Q=; b=e8PGAyUqH/XzFO5QV5h388Srs1TUKhuouH2CDiBrgk7IofZqLVgGSNvW6cJ9GARecO sYzVhNn8oo7OoQMtwlHzGPuTqjw7OWU8rDbPh/9j5tQWD9KYRiVidxDnqSHptKFxkPqK BVL8kbiE9Lz+wIe4oe9o/3BlfqaX+rz5OYmu4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=wP83mQA0gMb64vr096/W93zCylRUkOricIgyLEzQR7Q=; b=PcV6xYlvO0/CFfauWV7qUKyvZQQ7zlvVIk8RfpPOVsEFGHmDIDhVymdIY9BwNfyudz WJO8aXjw2INXO2XfLwPgmsHPmGNPnj6qEezekgVBBKXCfyIO+FHdkPWK2U5Iw3a3KKhe Z3q/mH1FTXzrrYkzypDrAL9owc6rqj+NA3SHMW3FUjGvsNPxuOF/UnMHFOgeh1sWsbk3 zNpCbcTSCoEjzrekheX4BDl9Sg60O5KagOZSHYuyl/afcZaKIUrKtLE+9QFb04djGPEW ifvlVYhDC72JeZIrcuf5cwTB2+x6LuQNbD9waOC6zDmPhydoYkuKBy/kLRkqD4RBJp+6 Fylw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.29.71 with SMTP id i7mr20167393lbh.85.1357230271937; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 08:24:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.81.169 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:24:31 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [100.42.242.195] In-Reply-To: <20130102073536.3c4d4f29@tech304.office.supranet.net> References: <50E3F07E.7000507@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20130102073536.3c4d4f29@tech304.office.supranet.net> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:24:31 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD: GIT instaed of SVN? From: Joseph Mingrone To: Mark Felder , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkw23oJfui/aCsbkPOvpkme+j6jez3Yaw+0jIVm8+vX/fUAAy7YjDS2iSCwOPfjLXVgBKfk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:24:34 -0000 On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Mark Felder wrote: > Git is also not BSD licensed. I believe it may require bringing Python into base as well. A little of topic, but Fossil is BSD licensed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 16:38:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8BC1231 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 16:38:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D222A1 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 16:38:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:38:12 -0800 Message-ID: <50E5B3F1.7040905@a1poweruser.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:38:09 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More Subject: Re: utility to compare 2 dir trees References: <50E23A95.80907@a1poweruser.com> <50E23FC3.5060204@a1poweruser.com> <20130101085355.4e4767c2@X220.ovitrap.com> <50E24558.8040501@a1poweruser.com> <50E24C71.5090104@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jan 2013 16:38:12.0235 (UTC) FILETIME=[B88D4DB0:01CDE9D0] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: Erich Dollansky , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:38:11 -0000 Adam Vande More wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > >> ended up trying >> cd dir-tree1 >> mtree -c | mtree -p dir-tree2 >> >> Now this seems like it worked, except every thing was flagged for >> non-matching modification time. How do I tell it to not check modification >> time? >> > > > mtree -c -k sha256digest,uname,gname | mtree -p dir-tree2 > Thank you that worked. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 16:58:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043368D0 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 16:58:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA41737D for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 16:58:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.31]) by ltcfislmsgpa07.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r03GwPUC032464 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 3 Jan 2013 10:58:25 -0600 Received: from [10.0.0.102] (10.14.152.61) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 10:58:24 -0600 Subject: Re: somewhat OT ... in parts MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) From: Devin Teske In-Reply-To: <20130103084422.00004eac.rodperson@rodperson.com> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:58:23 -0800 Message-ID: <183CB4AF-64D9-45F2-9B81-8B9704FADEAD@fisglobal.com> References: <20130103025305.GA24960@ethic.thought.org> <20130103084422.00004eac.rodperson@rodperson.com> To: Rod Person X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.61] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-01-03_05:2013-01-03,2013-01-03,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Gary Kline , FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Devin Teske List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:58:27 -0000 On Jan 3, 2013, at 5:44 AM, Rod Person wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:53:05 -0800 > Gary Kline wrote: >>=20 >> thanks in advance for a few url's.=20=20 >>=20 >=20 > I love this color scheme, I use it for everything. There is a vim > specific version...http://ethanschoonover.com/solarized >=20 On the vim-specific page ( https://github.com/altercation/vim-colors-solari= zed ), it has a section "Important note for terminal users". Q: Did you do what it said in that section? or do you only use the vim colo= rscheme? Q: If you customized your terminal colors with solarize, does it work out a= lright in various situations? (for example, putty versus Mac OS X Terminal = versus physical FreeBSD console, et cetera) --=20 Devin _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 17:15:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A47EB94; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:15:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rodperson@rodperson.com) Received: from www6.pairlite.com (www6.pairlite.com [64.130.10.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1FF1645; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:15:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from unknown (unknown-ip-614.ccbh.upmc.edu [128.147.110.113]) by www6.pairlite.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A783967AF6; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:15:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:15:31 -0500 From: Rod Person To: Devin Teske Subject: Re: somewhat OT ... in parts Message-ID: <20130103121531.00000478@unknown> In-Reply-To: <183CB4AF-64D9-45F2-9B81-8B9704FADEAD@fisglobal.com> References: <20130103025305.GA24960@ethic.thought.org> <20130103084422.00004eac.rodperson@rodperson.com> <183CB4AF-64D9-45F2-9B81-8B9704FADEAD@fisglobal.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0cvs30 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gary Kline , devin.teske@fisglobal.com, FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:15:33 -0000 On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:58:23 -0800 Devin Teske wrote: > > On Jan 3, 2013, at 5:44 AM, Rod Person wrote: > > > On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:53:05 -0800 > > Gary Kline wrote: > >> > >> thanks in advance for a few url's. > >> > > > > I love this color scheme, I use it for everything. There is a vim > > specific version...http://ethanschoonover.com/solarized > > > > On the vim-specific page > ( https://github.com/altercation/vim-colors-solarized ), it has a > section "Important note for terminal users". > > Q: Did you do what it said in that section? or do you only use the > vim colorscheme? > > Q: If you customized your terminal colors with solarize, does it work > out alright in various situations? (for example, putty versus Mac OS > X Terminal versus physical FreeBSD console, et cetera) > I don't use vim, sorry for giving that impression. But I do use the scheme for xterm and rxvt and the only real issue I ran into so far is that when using mc the background comes out light blue and the file names are in a light grey and hard to see. Otherwise it's great. I don't use Mac OS X, so I can't say. -- Rod Person http://www.rodperson.com rodperson@rodperson.com "i need to banf a chick and im onna fuck amanafa" -Herb Sent From Claws Mail 3.8.0cvs30 Win7 x86 GTK+ 2.16.6/GLib 2.24.0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 17:50:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61EBBA85 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:50:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from celso.vianna@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f170.google.com (mail-qc0-f170.google.com [209.85.216.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3A37E4 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:50:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id d42so8258027qca.29 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:50:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=C2rI8lziR0s/bDM0p/N8hMw4zV3xqqEy6QQYZT9S1sM=; b=DW9v/wWTnpdzxcR1GyNfpQ9S0PSSZL5OQv+RLHFezbdnsADgzHkX14E3FfVO2ek3+p Ihg6U9SKc5Oh78FEEP4IBmQI+qdgLdmqn1ntum2awt59dpLm21M7eDuTBMldsOvGZP2h RZXiVE4TyNXkVscup9EGzr3DIByPWTYpoelJJYdot15FZl0ssIhrC9lyO6c2aOGnKh9G egGI0vc/aHYGC6MR2x4iSYHaGFwsK+yQ2vpkDTz2w70qUlhLRfuryfqGDTHBn/Vw9elf SbIR+8uo6I77gghZgHWd+JwAlmbOkE4/vTfpIMVZMnxoziS8M7OkluZ3qHyyXnI1jr9I JdUw== Received: by 10.224.213.69 with SMTP id gv5mr28705363qab.91.1357235452345; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:50:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.82.168 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 09:50:32 -0800 (PST) From: Celso Viana Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 14:50:32 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: FreeBSD 9.1 RELEASE - does not install package To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:50:53 -0000 Hi all, I can not install the package "subversion" with "pkg_add -r" pkg_add: unable to fetch 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/subversion.tbz' by URL I observed that there is "packages-9.1-release" in 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64" In FreeBSD 9.1 RELEASE, how do I install packages via "pkg_add"? Thanks!! -- Celso Vianna BSD User: 51318 http://www.bsdcounter.org Palmas/TO From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 17:56:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D5BD2B for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:56:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jnagyjr1978@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yh0-f53.google.com (mail-yh0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5957842 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f53.google.com with SMTP id q11so2524611yhf.12 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:56:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aTWKNjN+b1h4P3+oJhMNltooNUQBo2iOTai8mOtNkO8=; b=ocD2R3aRmjUaEyy5LJ/B+BYI0zeY3xJ8YHSpziud7wlfgHDbSxU3GpBdtMjF5atpzq Y5xK9yueontbwkmVDqzZqtMrPAcoG5rm8AHLSvGtCp3flO3fCo+EygAfcLZJN7rQGiAD WsM7/rzUf5VGjDe2Uw9bQI5Ws/A3GJI/+cfbKGnm+ynC+xOWxKAKnP8gPgtq2eYXCQCE 4zJHZ+GHv5IhvRtZnrCeQZDILcUJ4JELQJl6zPtfXlxuzqcGl2zNiKhqLUVJSzlhKmJv 6+50vgR4Jgk1AkDnazFzo+u61EztpnBDjWsKlFRkqH6/Mx8PdT2izA9YDQl4n696FIUS rzEw== X-Received: by 10.236.176.41 with SMTP id a29mr50444906yhm.17.1357235781764; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:56:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (vid-196.dhcp.grp10.tnmmrl.infoave.net. [204.116.254.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l51sm50379438yhh.16.2013.01.03.09.56.20 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:56:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50E5C642.1090404@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:56:18 -0600 From: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 RELEASE - does not install package References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:56:28 -0000 On 01/03/13 11:50, Celso Viana wrote: > Hi all, > > I can not install the package "subversion" with "pkg_add -r" > > pkg_add: unable to fetch > 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/subversion.tbz' > by URL > > I observed that there is "packages-9.1-release" in > 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64" > > In FreeBSD 9.1 RELEASE, how do I install packages via "pkg_add"? > > Thanks!! > You don't, the pkgbeta site is, to my knowledge, still down. Also, if pkgng is in by default, next time try 'pkg add' instead. -- Yours in Christ, Joseph A Nagy Jr "Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1 Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL http://owl.apotheon.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 18:19:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0615B62D for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:19:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8CF97A for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:18:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.6/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r03IIs1d042268 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:18:55 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk r03IIs1d042268 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1357237135; bh=fnqRxXqenkqC9YrAkhI/urrTY2RaKKotFklFv4H5KrU=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Thu,=2003=20Jan=202013=2018:18:47=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20"Joseph=20A.=2 0Nagy,=20Jr"=20|CC:=20freebsd-questions@fre ebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20FreeBSD=209.1=20RELEASE=20-=20does=20not =20install=20package|References:=20=20<50E5C642.1090404@gmail. com>|In-Reply-To:=20<50E5C642.1090404@gmail.com>; b=iNGx8uDVDH1/GxMpOhOBaNv3Iq4iPXovT066z/EdS5OU5QWg3MC2Cyz+Wsvn3BMSG OgnwrufWC+ZfYbn0YCGjrCfyfy7EXhbCt1ffu3Zdxx8twO/puJCY1rQMySkwkdkrs7 7NiNvEvoC4xyS1Sf9Yndv5vLeDudp/E38gMAnqVY= Message-ID: <50E5CB87.7020201@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:18:47 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 RELEASE - does not install package References: <50E5C642.1090404@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <50E5C642.1090404@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig51528C9741F39B3CBD159FCA" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:19:00 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig51528C9741F39B3CBD159FCA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/01/2013 17:56, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: > On 01/03/13 11:50, Celso Viana wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I can not install the package "subversion" with "pkg_add -r" >> >> pkg_add: unable to fetch >> 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/La= test/subversion.tbz' >> >> by URL >> >> I observed that there is "packages-9.1-release" in >> 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64" >> >> In FreeBSD 9.1 RELEASE, how do I install packages via "pkg_add"? >> >> Thanks!! >> >=20 > You don't, the pkgbeta site is, to my knowledge, still down. Also, if > pkgng is in by default, next time try 'pkg add' instead. >=20 pkgng isn't in 9.1 by default. You've got to wait until 9.2 for that (or upgrade to 10.x). However, you can choose to install it from ports if you wish. The OP is asking about pkg_add, however the answer is basically the same for either pkg_tools and pkgng: The security incident: http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html has meant that all of the package building systems available to the FreeBSD project (either for pkg_tools or pkgng) have been quarantined, pending sanitization and reinstallation. Consequently there have hardly been any packages built in the last month or so. There are no packages available yet for the packages-9.1-release set. There are no packages available from pkgbeta (except for a lonely copy of pkg-1.0.3.txz so people can bootstrap pkgng on their machines). For pkg_tools, there are older packages available: you should be able to use pkg compiled for 9.0 or stable/9 pretty successfully on 9.1-RELEASE. For pkgng unfortunately your only choices are to wait patiently or to compile your own. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk --------------enig51528C9741F39B3CBD159FCA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDly44ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxRDgCfUw0vZCzdVKL7UZdQrFfB9JJm rTUAnRUXtYX8xmdRQ/gqSK55g2Cop2OZ =tNKJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig51528C9741F39B3CBD159FCA-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 18:30:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB729EE for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:30:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from mail.feld.me (mail.feld.me [66.170.3.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B17A07 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:30:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=4bjWWPyXiCzZf0B8q+o+cbeKRqFrUtNbDo//2s3T0AM=; b=GltBHqaT50w7ixJFYN7bfCUdri7J5BYUMpTAuBR+cuVaejZeiDNf8PaPNeSqaPaeZWHKwiligYm0J+JR0BcFd0DPAh97tkbb8o4cob/8FF3uwDIU8AydaY2wZJ+RHetS; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by mail.feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1TqpYj-000A3U-0q; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:30:32 -0600 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1357237823-27448-27447/5/4; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:30:23 +0000 Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:30:22 -0600 From: Mark Felder To: Joseph Mingrone Subject: Re: FreeBSD: GIT instaed of SVN? Message-Id: <20130103123022.5d0b3648@tech304.office.supranet.net> In-Reply-To: References: <50E3F07E.7000507@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20130102073536.3c4d4f29@tech304.office.supranet.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SA-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, KHOP_THREADED=-0.5 X-SA-Score: -1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:30:45 -0000 On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:24:31 -0400 Joseph Mingrone wrote: > A little of topic, but Fossil is BSD licensed. It also would work poorly as an SCM for FreeBSD because everything would = be in a giant sqlite database :( From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 18:53:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B35DDC6 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:53:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D04B02 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48CFC277D9; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 19:53:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r03IrO0r001911; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 19:53:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 19:53:24 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Rod Person Subject: Re: somewhat OT ... in parts Message-Id: <20130103195324.57499aca.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20130103121531.00000478@unknown> References: <20130103025305.GA24960@ethic.thought.org> <20130103084422.00004eac.rodperson@rodperson.com> <183CB4AF-64D9-45F2-9B81-8B9704FADEAD@fisglobal.com> <20130103121531.00000478@unknown> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:53:29 -0000 On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:15:31 -0500, Rod Person wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:58:23 -0800 > Devin Teske wrote: > > > > > On Jan 3, 2013, at 5:44 AM, Rod Person wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:53:05 -0800 > > > Gary Kline wrote: > > >> > > >> thanks in advance for a few url's. > > >> > > > > > > I love this color scheme, I use it for everything. There is a vim > > > specific version...http://ethanschoonover.com/solarized > > > > > > > On the vim-specific page > > ( https://github.com/altercation/vim-colors-solarized ), it has a > > section "Important note for terminal users". > > > > Q: Did you do what it said in that section? or do you only use the > > vim colorscheme? > > > > Q: If you customized your terminal colors with solarize, does it work > > out alright in various situations? (for example, putty versus Mac OS > > X Terminal versus physical FreeBSD console, et cetera) > > > > I don't use vim, sorry for giving that impression. But I do use the > scheme for xterm and rxvt and the only real issue I ran into so far is > that when using mc the background comes out light blue and the file > names are in a light grey and hard to see. Otherwise it's great. I'm using a similar approach inspired by XFCE (version 3) to have my xterms look solarized: xterm -fg black -bg beige -title Terminal When launching the Midnight Commander inside the terminal, everything is displayed properly. I'm using MC's default color scheme. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 19:03:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71A9810 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 19:03:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from mail-pb0-f42.google.com (mail-pb0-f42.google.com [209.85.160.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87765BF7 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 19:03:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id rp2so8693521pbb.15 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:03:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=lBbR/nvX8ztJtCT//7GK9GYEP3O9jq+MlJ+m6ohAuEA=; b=WmCfeERtVeS6zGs3n3658M+5KjOJyeFArju6dke4Herkd65EXFLNnpMlNryOTlSz3Q NXoG/q+W8sGNNhaUhtw9gyanFNJXk+rv4DSbLmZ0+llZKIXt0pt/DjIWpJgeJUEVfQT0 Nj01xA8VEacTbl+Q8bcffVcFNWif9wujZUvrzla6x0aXpXKBcXZDL8CzkPdc1MtQgFlP sqI4Xo+VAZDblRXNa7vRyDmEPm/aQlN7WK/j8BElqnIZ8tSYNuctUsVbEuOYhF5RNGU1 yDoR2d5xTrIH58mUzj07M9oeWVHZhuiLZ95UsbhK1SiEF5vRoEjLt0UkBqz3Px0XrJov Cecw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.138.195 with SMTP id qs3mr155198016pbb.62.1357239793402; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:03:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.10.194 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 11:03:13 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [93.221.179.72] In-Reply-To: <50E46078.9010407@eskk.nu> References: <50E46078.9010407@eskk.nu> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 20:03:13 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Trying to find out how to mount as user From: "C. P. Ghost" To: Leslie Jensen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmAM/Mmls/0rczH44HmPAEIcBCtF0lWyYuerhoTAOrHCqNmIsNigsNfbD0fw305rOQmMlAD Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:03:19 -0000 On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Leslie Jensen wrote: > Hello. > > I want to write a script, where I as a normal user, can back up my files > with rsync to another machine (pc01), which shares a directory via NFS. > > I have an entry in the local machines /etc/fstab > > pc01:/backup /mnt/backup nfs rw,noauto 0 0 > > > The command: > mount /mnt/backup works as root. > > If I do sudo mount /mnt/backup I get > [tcp] pc01:/backup: Permission denied > > I'm a member of the local wheel group and at the remote machine as > well(pc01) > > pc01:/backup has > drwxrwxr-x 28 root wheel 1024 1 Jan 14:44 backup/ > > > The local mount point /mnt/backup has > drwxr-xr-x 5 root wheel 512 1 Jan 17:18 mnt/ > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 1 Jan 11:38 backup/ > > I've tried to ad write permissions to the group, but it did not help me. > > I understand that I have a permission problem but I can't figure it out. Try setting vfs.usermount to 1: # sysctl vfs.usermount=1 -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 19:34:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5EC26C for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 19:34:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from unlock.service@stgeorge.com.au) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5595EDAC for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 19:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from icpu1207.kundenserver.de (infong144.kundenserver.de [212.227.119.33]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MJoZ6-1Tpk5x3tTw-001uyL; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:34:29 +0100 Received: from 105.243.7.138 (IP may be forged by CGI script) by icpu1207.kundenserver.de with HTTP id 4A2fHL-1TLtWn3cjg-00dn4h; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:34:29 +0100 X-Sender-Info: <41812350@icpu1207.kundenserver.de> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:34:29 +0100 Message-Id: <4A2fHL-1TLtWn3cjg-00dn4h@icpu1207.kundenserver.de> Precedence: bulk To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Important Notice - Online Account Locked! From: St. George Internet Banking X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:WylXD17Hk16fuNphJP6iWT94WwP1ufS4Ndi/lBzoV1w TCBH2Jbj6hKzSM8hqOb7Gbk8oSkehzkL+N8YdbBRwWMC8WkMK4 vStZ78qblo8oi5D4KDR5YVH50+aRZ1RNC5nQjHkH07M7mcEsPw wj1EG9smYwEtNqWxo1d2k/Ela31dDf68zn4/z1jDFzI1JqOffx +KUwxxKprARyMb3uwNVreLUHyKMzPleMSVAUTsfUs36BDRZ+rK TNuQgt7/QsYZBOJhuBg0eC1D0HLJgz40cNlxxRilJbhzSU2+uf 770OQwj/AOhyOASm1TElvZ14TKN04y5JXxr9rF9JsIy4f3kYpq dUoNneOnbzm9HojEcVjf5rhcgVY/I6LY2E2GaxyZnHLSmGIEnI eha1BvY+ZSv7jS8SDOYymLHVjrGErzDLWUPnkilVfL89VD0Xrr t9CQ7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:34:31 -0000 http://promos.stgeorge.com.au/resources/images/popup/logo.gif Dear Customer Your online banking has been temporarily suspended, due to 3 unsuccessful login attempt on your account. To uplift this suspension, Please click on the Unlock option Below and confirm your account details. [1]Unlock IMPORTANT - You are strictly advised to match your Sensitive Details correctly to avoid service denial. Yours sincerely, St.George Bank Customer Service References 1. http://buffetdannigarcia.com.br/dataweb/produtos/st/st/loginPage.action.php From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 19:40:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBF161C for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 19:40:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberleo@cyberleo.net) Received: from paka.cyberleo.net (mtumishi.cyberleo.net [216.226.128.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63671E12 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 19:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.44.4] (den.cyberleo.net [216.80.73.130]) by paka.cyberleo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2056711E87B; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 14:40:48 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <50E5DEBF.8040701@cyberleo.net> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:40:47 -0600 From: CyberLeo Kitsana User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121201 Thunderbird/10.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Laabs Subject: Re: Build linux,ko kernel module standalone References: <50E58023.9050000@martinlaabs.de> In-Reply-To: <50E58023.9050000@martinlaabs.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:40:55 -0000 On 01/03/2013 06:57 AM, Martin Laabs wrote: > Hello, > > if I wanna build a kernel module standalone (without the kernel e.g. for > testing) I do it the following way (wlan in this example): > > cd /usr/src/sys/modules/wlan > make all > maybe make install if I wanna install it. > > Now I want do build the linux.ko module with the symbol DEBUG defined and > tried the following: > > cd /usr/src/sys/modules/linux make depend > make -DDEBUG all Be wary of changing compile options for only certain parts of the kernel, as this may lead to problems with mismatching code. -- Fuzzy love, -CyberLeo Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 20:28:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75583420 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 20:28:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [94.23.254.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB96160 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 20:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A07FAC51; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 21:19:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46112CEC02; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 21:19:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 21:19:18 +0100 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: Leslie Jensen Subject: Re: Which k3b is recommended? Message-ID: <20130103211918.5fce357d@davenulle.org> In-Reply-To: <50E54666.4060407@eskk.nu> References: <50E54666.4060407@eskk.nu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; i386-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:28:34 -0000 Le Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:50:46 +0100, Leslie Jensen a écrit : > > I need k3b on a newly installed 9.1-RELEASE system. > > I wonder if I miss out on some functionality if I go with version > without KDE? Don't know. > I use XFCE4 as my Desktop. Did you tried sysutils/xfburn? It is ligth but does the job. (nowadays I use cdrecord directly, but xfburn worked in the past...) Regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 20:33:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968407C2 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 20:33:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asv@inhio.eu) Received: from cz-prg-mx-01.inhio.eu (mail.inhio.eu [178.238.36.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4AE1BF for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 20:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.2.2] (93-45-193-105.ip103.fastwebnet.it [93.45.193.105]) by cz-prg-mx-01.inhio.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 969DE62BF1; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 20:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1357245230.2060.1.camel@pulsar> Subject: Re: just a curiosity about auth.conf From: ASV To: Arthur Chance Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:33:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: <50E540C8.2040808@qeng-ho.org> References: <1357043607.2063.13.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> <50E540C8.2040808@qeng-ho.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4 (3.4.4-2.fc17) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:33:59 -0000 I haven't installed 9.1 yet but good to know. Thanks. On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 08:26 +0000, Arthur Chance wrote: > On 01/01/13 12:33, ASV wrote: > > Good afternoon and happy new year to everybody. > > > > I'm just curious about auth.conf. > > > > According to the detailed release notes > > (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.1R/relnotes-detailed.html): > > "auth.conf(5) has been removed because it was deprecated years > > ago.[r238481]" > > > > but according to the man pages online AUTH.CONF(5) of FBSD9.0-RELEASE: > > "auth.conf contains various attributes important to the authentication > > code, most notably crypt(3) for the time being. This documentation will > > be updated as the /etc/auth.conf file, which is very new, evolves.". > > > > How can something deprecated years ago being new and evolving quickly > > enough to require further doc updates? Am I missing something? :) > > Looks like the man page hasn't been updated in a while. If you're not > yet on 9.1, and look at auth.conf itself it says in the header comments > > # Configure some authentication-related defaults. This file is being > # gradually subsumed by user class and PAM configuration. > > I.e. it is/was an old way of doing things that has been replaced by > newer mechanisms. Personally I'm glad to see the team clearing out the > cruft. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 20:41:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A95D1A for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 20:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joji@eskimo.com) Received: from ultra7.eskimo.com (ultra7.eskimo.com [204.122.16.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1E423F for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 20:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shellx.eskimo.com (root@shellx.eskimo.com [204.122.16.5]) by ultra7.eskimo.com (8.14.0/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r03KewwA005888; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:40:59 -0800 Received: from shellx.eskimo.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shellx.eskimo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r03Kf1CU005124; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:41:01 -0800 Received: (from joji@localhost) by shellx.eskimo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id r03Kf0W4005123; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:41:00 -0800 Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:41:00 -0800 From: Joseph Olatt To: Matthias Apitz , hugo@barafranca.com Subject: Re: audio/baresip on FreeBSD 9 Message-ID: <20130103204100.GA1376@shellx.eskimo.com> References: <20130103041911.GA29654@shellx.eskimo.com> <20130103071541.GB1219@tiny.Sisis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130103071541.GB1219@tiny.Sisis.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:41:07 -0000 On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 08:15:41AM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Hi, > > El d?a Wednesday, January 02, 2013 a las 08:19:11PM -0800, Joseph Olatt escribi?: > > > > > I've been trying to get baresip to work on my FreeBSD 9.x laptop and > > haven't had much success. I register successfully to callcentric.com and > > it appears that I can connect and there is a stream of data coming > > through based on the status display: > > > > [0:00:08] audio=0/0 (bit/s) [ ] > > The display shows zero audio data! > > > However, there is no sound. > > Have you tried the local audio loop with pressing the single letter 'a'? > > > Is anybody on the list successfully using baresip? If so, could they > > please provide some pointers on how to get sound? > > I'm attaching my config file which works fine; in your config file it > looks stange to me: > > > # Audio > > audio_dev /dev/audio0.0 > > do you have such a device file '/dev/audio0.0'? > > > # Audio codec Modules (in order) > > #module g7221.so > > #module g722.so > > module g711.so > > #module gsm.so > > #module l16.so > > #module speex.so > > #module celt.so > > #module bv32.so > > > > # Audio filter Modules (in order) > > # NOTE: AEC should be before Preproc > > #module sndfile.so > > #module speex_aec.so > > #module speex_pp.so > > #module speex_resamp.so > > #module plc.so > > > > # Audio driver Modules > > #module oss.so > > #module alsa.so > > #module portaudio.so > > #module gst.so > > you have no audio driver loaded, try 'oss.so' > > Once you get the local loop working you could contact me off-list for my > SIP and try to call me. > > HIH > > matthias > -- > Sent from my FreeBSD netbook > > Matthias Apitz | - No system with backdoors like Apple/Android > E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | - No HTML/RTF in E-mail > WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | - No proprietary attachments > phone: +49-170-4527211 | - Respect for open standards > # > # baresip configuration > # > > #------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > # Core > poll_method poll # poll, select, epoll .. > > # Input > input_device /dev/event0 > input_port 5555 > > # SIP > sip_trans_bsize 128 > #sip_listen 127.0.0.1:5050 > > # Audio > audio_dev /dev/dsp > audio_srate 8000-48000 > audio_channels 1-2 > #audio_aec_length 128 # [ms] > > # Video > video_dev /dev/video0 > video_size 352x288 > video_bitrate 384000 > video_fps 25 > #video_selfview window # {window,pip} > > # AVT - Audio/Video Transport > rtp_tos 184 > #rtp_ports 10000-20000 > rtp_ports 1024-1030 > #rtp_bandwidth 512-1024 # [kbit/s] > rtcp_enable yes > rtcp_mux no > jitter_buffer_delay 5-10 # frames > > # Network > #dns_server 10.0.0.1:53 > > #------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > # Modules > > module_path /usr/local/lib/baresip/modules > > # UI Modules > module stdio.so > module cons.so > #module evdev.so > > # Audio codec Modules (in order) > #module g7221.so > #module g722.so > module g711.so > #module gsm.so > #module l16.so > #module speex.so > #module celt.so > #module bv32.so > > # Audio filter Modules (in order) > # NOTE: AEC should be before Preproc > #module sndfile.so > #module speex_aec.so > #module speex_pp.so > #module speex_resamp.so > #module plc.so > > # Audio driver Modules > module oss.so > #module alsa.so > #module portaudio.so > #module gst.so > > # Video codec Modules (in order) > module avcodec.so > #module vpx.so > > # Video source modules > module v4l2.so > #module avformat.so > #module v4l.so > > # Video display modules > module x11.so > # module sdl.so > > # Media NAT modules > module stun.so > module turn.so > module ice.so > > # Media encoding modules > #module srtp.so > > # Other modules > #module natbd.so > > #------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > # Module parameters > > > # Speex codec parameters > speex_quality 7 # 0-10 > speex_complexity 7 # 0-10 > speex_enhancement 0 # 0-1 > speex_vbr 0 # Variable Bit Rate 0-1 > speex_vad 0 # Voice Activity Detection 0-1 > speex_agc_level 8000 > > # NAT Behavior Discovery > natbd_server creytiv.com > natbd_interval 600 # in seconds > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hi Matthias and Hugo, Thank you for your responses. After reading them I realized that I need to check one of the config options for the audio driver. For the benefit of future users of baresip on FreeBSD: cd /usr/ports/audio/baresip > make showconfig ===> The following configuration options are available for baresip-0.4.0: CELT=off: CELT audio codec CONS=on: Console input driver DOCS=on: Build and/or install documentation FFMPEG=off: FFmpeg (WMA, AIFF, AC3, APE...) G711=on: G.711 audio codec G722=on: G.722 audio codec GSM=off: GSM codec support GSTREAMER=off: Multimedia via GStreamer ILBC=off: iLBC audio codec L16=on: L16 audio codec OPUS=off: Opus audio codec OSS=on: Open Sound System <<-- Enable PORTAUDIO=on: PortAudio library <<-- Enable SDL=off: Simple Direct Media Layer SNDFILE=off: libsndfile support SPEEX=off: Speex audio format SRTP=off: Secure RTP module STDIO=on: stdio input driver UUID=off: UUID module V4L=off: Video4Linux module V4L2=off: Video4Linux2 module X11=off: X11 (graphics) support ===> Use 'make config' to modify these settings Needed to enable OSS or PORTAUDIO. I enabled both and tested by activating each one at a time in ~/.baresip/config file. Both worked. I'm still not sure if speaking into the microphone is working. As soon as I find someone to communicate with using SIP, I'll find out. Thanks to both of you for your assistance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 20:53:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F035C8 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 20:53:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@vereshagin.org) Received: from mx1.skyriver.ru (ns1.skyriver.ru [89.108.118.221]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A056633E for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 20:53:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (h-74-15.a183.priv.bahnhof.se [46.59.74.15]) by mx1.skyriver.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 528C05BDF for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 00:45:44 +0400 (MSK) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 00:45:34 +0400 From: Peter Vereshagin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which k3b is recommended? Message-ID: <20130103204533.GA12881@external.screwed.box> References: <50E54666.4060407@eskk.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50E54666.4060407@eskk.nu> Organization: ' X-Face: 8T>{1owI$Byj]]a; ^G]kRf*dkq>E-3':F>4ODP[#X4s"dr?^b&2G@'3lukno]A1wvJ_L(~u 6>I2ra/<,j1%@C[LN=>p#_}RIV+#:KTszp-X$bQOj,K X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:53:16 -0000 Hello. 2013/01/03 09:50:46 +0100 Leslie Jensen => To FreeBSD Questions : LJ> I need k3b on a newly installed 9.1-RELEASE system. LJ> I wonder if I miss out on some functionality if I go with version LJ> without KDE? LJ> I use XFCE4 as my Desktop. I use the 'sysutils/tkdvd' and the only thing I time to time use to find missing there is the '-joliet-long' checkbox. -- Peter Vereshagin (http://vereshagin.org) pgp: 1754B9C1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 20:59:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F65A3D for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 20:59:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725BC3D3 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 20:59:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TqrtL-00073m-E1 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:59:55 +0100 Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.21.186.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:59:55 +0100 Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:59:55 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Walter Hurry Subject: pkgng - Obsolete Dependencies? Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 20:59:21 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 9 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 30dc37b master) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:59:43 -0000 On several of my boxes (set up with pkgng), libcheck was recorded as a dependency of a number of (wxPython etc.) packages. However, I noticed that on a fresh install, libcheck did not get pulled in. So I returned to the older boxes and reinstalled the depending packages, using 'pkg install -f'. Lo and behold, the dependencies disappeared. Is this expected behaviour? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 22:11:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EFE8627 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 22:11:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73DB9AC for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 22:11:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.6/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r03MBEOp018342 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Jan 2013 22:11:14 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk r03MBEOp018342 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/r03MBEOp018342; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy) Message-ID: <50E60201.405@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:11:13 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Walter Hurry Subject: Re: pkgng - Obsolete Dependencies? References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6AC7A98B8218369354FFE27B" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:11:19 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6AC7A98B8218369354FFE27B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/01/2013 20:59, Walter Hurry wrote: > On several of my boxes (set up with pkgng), libcheck was recorded as a = > dependency of a number of (wxPython etc.) packages. However, I noticed = > that on a fresh install, libcheck did not get pulled in. >=20 > So I returned to the older boxes and reinstalled the depending packages= ,=20 > using 'pkg install -f'. Lo and behold, the dependencies disappeared. >=20 > Is this expected behaviour? As far as I can see, libcheck is not currently a dependency of any of the x11-toolkits/py-wx* ports. As libcheck is a unit test framework, it would be unlikely to be anything other than a BUILD_DEPENDS anyhow -- and if you use pkgng with a repo, the only packages you'ld install and the only dependencies pkgng would record are the RUN_DEPENDS and LIB_DEPENDS. So I don't know why it appeared on your older systems, but having it disappear on the updated ones would be correct and the expected outcome. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enig6AC7A98B8218369354FFE27B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDmAgEACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzSDACfS/Z8c8pOdE1svPex31NxVYny j+QAn1TviFskK1cZnyNAxpC5gpQjl6f8 =PFUR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6AC7A98B8218369354FFE27B-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 22:36:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2BAF88 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 22:36:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mattr-lists@eagle.ca) Received: from cohiba.eagle.ca (cohiba.eagle.ca [208.70.104.203]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB34AAF for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 22:36:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79882 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jan 2013 22:29:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO MattRauchPC) (mattr-lists@eagle.ca@208.70.104.100) by cohiba.eagle.ca with ESMTPA; 3 Jan 2013 22:29:49 -0000 From: "Matt Rauch" To: Subject: Looking for info on how to install and configure suPHP on FreeBSD 8 Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:29:46 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 thread-index: Ac3qAdXivZtQ5j/4Rz6vmocsC1TF0g== X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:36:32 -0000 Hello, I apologize if there is an easy spot to find this, but I'm looking for some instructions on implementing suPHP on FreeBSD 8 with Apache. The server is currently in production and I'd like to convert it from running PHP files as an Apache module and instead as cgi with suPHP for security and for some issues that crop up with file and directory ownership with Joomla and other CMS platforms. I have done quite a bit of searching and cannot find just a step by step installation guide of any kind for FreeBSD. I can find my way around FreeBSD pretty well, but am by no means an expert user, hence why a guide would be perfect. Any help would be greatly appreciated, Matt Rauch From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 00:17:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1907FD for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 00:17:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kazakevichilya@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f177.google.com (mail-ob0-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33106F45 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 00:17:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id uo13so14487969obb.36 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:17:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=S8tyBhQzV0oMcaG7OJkykiXFJagIjU+A/731mAKoG/M=; b=vDYSMXm1aEK9BGdweaYk7mhsSoLf3gaqTWYoDfKHsKeL+qjpucsb9GEvcfNdK/cCQB 0JjaSK5kK4jL+fQ87dM9RB2XhvboUwgCjSOm+IlLTSf8CiWs1Hh1QJOIElsWkY0bPPey JRtU5CTz+VwZzJrIaQATkcp7dus17U6PJZtum0g+bWAfRlXYtIv89a3MxmLYU6qrBGkW miISZGhAnFJn1xkJzsmRosxTOl2pcMMcSeouvjTBlyeg48jd7CL18RRLBhdc5dCtfrMe jwUkPuge0X8BOA4XQerAWiJlPhmtVHNk9N9P9cemIoPkkKSQEHcixUNu6EbcmR53tOkZ lzIQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.170.242 with SMTP id ap18mr28552327oec.97.1357258620463; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:17:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.38.104 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 16:17:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 04:17:00 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Looking for info on how to install and configure suPHP on FreeBSD 8 From: Ilya Kazakevich To: Matt Rauch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:17:01 -0000 http://www.freshports.org/www/suphp/ Is not it what are you looking for? On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Matt Rauch wrote: > suPHP From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 01:50:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF58C04 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 01:50:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 3VzXmUA4JEeYbIgTWZ.aMWUSbjOUIQT.KWUNZMMJaL-YcMabQWVaxZMMtAv.WZO@maestro.bounces.google.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f69.google.com (mail-oa0-f69.google.com [209.85.219.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0FA275 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 01:50:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f69.google.com with SMTP id j6so68434853oag.0 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:50:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ilGaAAgPoO/c663uCNJ2Rlm+S1FhzTv+tYD7rLq9Kks=; b=bVGorg0/DQblmIM/eZkTDkYLETUkbMGNkEGdmkAT8zT3XJQMXL9iPqFVbywUKEJBsF hRuKhBsUcSqePo+5/tsoP+zHtb1pc2m1jWA+OgaHtBnStnnULcxjveo3PrDttZySZ3MQ dhGadDqx0PAeUcI2UDQAfpOQ+5YJfWg6atl0WjOoG0jKivnoZKRWVzXUhJMHP3vaCadk MZwlEdwEM87Dw+DKQnpwdU2h97j55UKob9tu147QVsb1LM2dLoubsDEfQw12E/OPy+AX nHFmCPF1pIT/w7dMR/wilmJve7aRzVlVKMF9+4EHPwZyGLAErdVafwmoBmgeJGRzIGZw h/PQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.99.1 with SMTP id cq1mr39344722icc.21.1357264215307; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:50:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 01:50:15 +0000 Subject: Gain Organic Traffic: Freebsd.Org :PS From: Justin Taylor To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 01:50:22 -0000 DQoNCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPkhpIEZyZWVic2QuT3JnIFRlYW0sPGJyPg0KPGJyPg0K SSB0aG91Z2h0IHlvdSBtaWdodCBsaWtlIHRvIGtub3cgc29tZSBvZiB0aGUgcmVhc29ucyB3aHkg eW91IGFyZSBub3QgZ2V0dGluZw0KZW5vdWdoIG9yZ2FuaWMgJmFtcDsgc29jaWFsIG1lZGlhIHRy YWZmaWMgb24geW91ciB3ZWJzaXRlLjxicj4NCjxicj4NCkkgd291bGQgbGlrZSB0byB1cGRhdGUg eW91IHRoYXQgeW91ciB3ZWJzaXRlIGlzIHN0aWxsIG5vdCByYW5rZWQgb24gdGhlIHRvcA0KcGFn ZXMgb2YgR29vZ2xlIFNFUlBzIGZvciB5b3VyIHBvcHVsYXIga2V5d29yZHMgKFByb2R1Y3RzKS4g WW91ciBsb3NzIGlzICANCnlvdXINCmNvbXBldGl0b3KScyBnYWluIGkuZS4gdGhlIHRyYWZmaWMg d2hpY2ggY291bGQgaGF2ZSBnZW5lcmF0ZWQgcXVhbGl0eSBzYWxlcyAgDQpmb3INCnlvdSBnb2Vz IHRvIHlvdXIgY29tcGV0aXRvcnMgYXMgdGhleSByYW5rIHdlbGwgaW4gdGhlIFNlYXJjaCBFbmdp bmUgUmVzdWx0DQpQYWdlcyAoU0VSUHMpIG9yZ2FuaWNhbGx5Ljxicj4NCjxicj4NCjxiPlJlYXNv bnM6IDwvYj48YnI+DQo8YnI+DQoxLqCgIKBIVE1MIGFuZCBvdGhlciBvbi1wYWdlIGVycm9ycyBh cmUgcHJlc2VudCBvbiB5b3VyIHdlYnNpdGUuPGJyPg0KMi6goCCgTG93IG51bWJlciBvZiBpbnRl cm5hbCBhbmQgZXh0ZXJuYWwgcXVhbGl0eSBsaW5rcyBwcmVzZW50DQpvbiB5b3VyIHdlYnNpdGUu PGJyPg0KMy6goCCgRHVwbGljYXRlIG9yIGxvdyBxdWFsaXR5IGNvbnRlbnRzIHByZXNlbnQgaW4g eW91ciB3ZWJzaXRlDQp3aXRob3V0IGFueSByZWd1bGFyIHVwZGF0ZS48YnI+DQo0LqCgIKBOZWVk IHRvIHVwZGF0ZSBmcmVzaCBjb250ZW50cyBvbiB5b3VyIHdlYnNpdGUgYW5kIGJsb2dzIGFzDQpw ZXIgdGhlIGxhdGVzdCBHb29nbGUgZ3VpZGVsaW5lLjxicj4NCjUuoKAgoEJyb2tlbiBMaW5rcyBh bmQgUG9pc29uIHdvcmRzIG1pZ2h0IGJlIHByZXNlbnQgaW4geW91cg0Kd2Vic2l0ZS48YnI+DQo2 LqCgIKBTb2NpYWwgbWVkaWEgcHJvZmlsZSBuZWVkcyB0byBiZSB1cGRhdGVkIHJlZ3VsYXJseS48 YnI+DQo8YnI+DQpMb25nIGdvbmUgYXJlIHRoZSBkYXlzIHdoZW4gR29vZ2xlIHVzZWQgdG8gZ2l2 ZSBwcmlvcml0eSB0byB3ZWJzaXRlcyBvZiAgDQprZXl3b3JkDQpiYXNlZCBkb21haW5zIG9yIHdl YnNpdGVzIHdpdGggaHVnZSBudW1iZXIgb2YgbGlua3MuIE5vdyBHb29nbGUgY291bnRzIGVhY2gg IA0KYW5kDQpldmVyeSBkZXRhaWwgdG8gdmVyaWZ5IGlmIHlvdXIgd2Vic2l0ZSBpcyByZWxldmFu dCB0byB0aGUga2V5d29yZHMgeW91IGFyZQ0KcHJvbW90aW5nIGZvci4gQSBzaW5nbGUgdW4td2Fu dGVkIGxpbmsgb3IgYSBkdXBsaWNhdGUgY29udGVudCBjYW4gbGVhZCB5b3VyDQp3ZWJzaXRlIHRv IGJlIHBlbmFsaXplZCBieSBHb29nbGUuPGJyPg0KPGJyPg0KV2UgYXJlIGEgbGVhZGluZyB3ZWJz aXRlIHByb21vdGlvbiBjb21wYW55IHByb3ZpZGluZyBvbmxpbmUgcHJvbW90aW9uLCBTTU8sDQpS ZXB1dGF0aW9uIE1hbmFnZW1lbnQsIENvbnRlbnQgKGJvdGggd2ViIGFuZCBwcm9tb3Rpb25hbCBj b250ZW50KSBmaXhpbmcNCnNlcnZpY2VzIHRvIGNsaWVudHMuIFdlIGhhdmUgYSB0ZWFtIG9mIDI0 MCsgU0VPIHByb2Zlc3Npb25hbCB3b3JraW5nDQoyNCo3LqAgT3VyIHRlYW0gb2YgZGVkaWNhdGVk IEdvb2dsZSBBbmFseXRpYyBhbmQgQWR3b3JkcyBjZXJ0aWZpZWQNCnByb2Zlc3Npb25hbHMgZXhj ZWwgaW4gcHJvbW90aW5nIGFuZCBpbmNyZWFzaW5nIHRoZSB2aXNpYmlsaXR5IG9mIGEgd2Vic2l0 ZSAgDQppbg0KdmFyaW91cyBzZWFyY2ggZW5naW5lcyAoaW5jbHVkaW5nIHRoZSBsYXRlc3QgR29v Z2xlIFBhbmRhIGFuZCBQZW5ndWluICANCnVwZGF0ZXMpLA0Kd2hpY2ggd2lsbCBkaXJlY3RseSBo ZWxwIGluIGluY3JlYXNpbmcgdHJhZmZpY3MgZm9yIHlvdXIgd2Vic2l0ZS48YnI+DQo8YnI+DQpV bmxpa2Ugb3RoZXIgU0VPIGNvbXBhbmllcyB3ZSBkbyBub3QgYmVsaWV2ZSBpbiB0YWxraW5nIHJh dGhlciB3ZSBiZWxpZXZlIGluDQpkZWxpdmVyaW5nIHdoYXQgd2UgcHJvbWlzZSB0byBvdXIgY2xp ZW50cy4gV2UgcHJvdmlkZSBndWFyYW50ZWVkIHNlcnZpY2VzIG9yDQptb25leSBiYWNrLWd1YXJh bnRlZSB0byBhbGwgb3VyIGNsaWVudHMgd2hvIGNvbnNpZGVyIHdvcmtpbmcgd2l0aCB1cy48YnI+ DQo8YnI+DQpJZiB5b3UgYXJlIGdldHRpbmcgcmlnaWQgYnkgcGF5aW5nIGEgaHVnZSBhbW91bnQg aW4gUFBDIHRoZW4gT3JnYW5pYyAgDQpsaXN0aW5nIGJ5DQp1c2luZyB3aGl0ZSBoYXQgdGVjaG5p cXVlIHdpbGwgYmUgZGVmaW5pdGVseSBhIHJpZ2h0IGNob2ljZSBmb3IgeW91LiBBcyB0aGUNCnJh dGUgb2YgY29udmVyc2lvbiBpcyBtb3JlIGluIG9yZ2FuaWMgbGlzdGluZyBhcyBjb21wYXJlZCB0 byBQUEMsICANCmV2ZW50dWFsbHkgaXQNCndpbGwgYmUgYW4gYWJzb2x1dGUgZ2FpbiBmb3IgeW91 LqAgPGJyPg0KPGJyPg0KVGhpcyBlbWFpbCBqdXN0IHRlbGxzIHlvdSB0aGUgZnJhY3Rpb24gb2Yg dGhpbmdzIHdlIGRvLCBvdXIgb3B0aW1pemF0aW9uDQpwcm9jZXNzIGludm9sdmVzIG1hbnkgb3Ro ZXIgdGVjaG5pY2FsIGZhY3RvcnMgd2hpY2ggY2FuIGJlIHNlbnQgdG8geW91IG9uICANCnlvdXIN CnJlcXVlc3QuIElmIHlvdSB3b3VsZCBsaWtlIHRvIGtub3cgbW9yZSBhYm91dCBvdXIgc2Vydmlj ZXMgdGhlbiBwbGVhc2UgIA0Kd3JpdGUgdXMNCmJhY2sgZWxzZSB5b3UgY2FuIGdpdmUgdXMgYSBj YWxsIHVzIGluIG91ciBudW1iZXIgYmVsb3cuPGJyPg0KPGJyPg0KUC5TOiAtIFRoaXMgaXMgb3Vy IG1hcmtldGluZyBzdHJhdGVneSB0aGF0IHdlIHVzZSB0aGUgR21haWwgYWNjb3VudC4gT25jZSAg DQp5b3UNCnJlcGx5IHVzIGJhY2ssIHRoZSBuZXh0IGNvbW11bmljYXRpb24gSSB3aWxsIGRvIGlz IGZyb20gbXkgY29ycG9yYXRlIGVtYWlsICANCklELjxicj4NCjxicj4NCkxldCBtZSBrbm93IHlv dXIgdGhvdWdodHMgYW5kIGxvb2tpbmcgZm9yd2FyZCB0byB3b3JrIHRvZ2V0aGVyLjxicj4NCjxi cj4NCkJlc3QgUmVnYXJkcywgPGJyPg0KSnVzdGluIFRheWxvcnxTZW5pb3IgU0VPIEFkdmlzb3I8 YnI+DQpQSC4gTm86ICgyMTcpIDY1MC03MDk1PGJyPg0KU2t5cGU6IGp1c3RpbnRheWxvcjg4ODxi cj4NCi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLTxXQlI+LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tPFdCUj4tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS08YnI+DQpOb3Rl OiA8YnI+DQoxOiBUaGlzIGlzIGEgb25ldGltZSBlbWFpbCBhbmQgeW91IG1heSBhc2sgdXMgdG8g k1JFTU9WRZQuPGJyPg0KMjqgIElmIHlvdSBhcmUgaW50ZXJlc3RlZCBJIHdpbGwgc2VuZCBtb3Jl IGRldGFpbHMgb24gb3VyIJNjb3Jwb3JhdGUNCmlkZW50aXR5lCwgk2NvbXBhbnkgcHJvZmlsZZQs IJN3aHkgeW91IHNob3VsZCBjaG9vc2UgdXM/lCwgk1ByaWNlIGxpc3SULCAgDQqTbW9uZXkNCmJh Y2uUIGV0Yy4gaW4gbXkgbmV4dCBtYWlsLjwvcD4NCg0K From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 02:34:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA788362 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 02:34:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from p3plsmtpa07-10.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa07-10.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.192.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91FF4350 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 02:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14918 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2013 02:27:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (209.180.213.209) by p3plsmtpa07-10.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (173.201.192.239) with ESMTP; 04 Jan 2013 02:27:34 -0000 Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:27:38 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: Polytropon Subject: Re: somewhat OT ... in parts Message-ID: <20130104022738.GA7368@ethic.thought.org> References: <20130103025305.GA24960@ethic.thought.org> <20130103072741.c02a1150.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130103072741.c02a1150.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 02:34:14 -0000 On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 07:27:41AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:53:05 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > > one reason ive stuck with vim-as-vi was of the colors that vim > > defaults to. I'v fought the dark/crap/puke brown / > > color that seems to be the default on my linux desktop. it's hard > > to see my block cursor when I search for words. und`zo, today I > > spend a couple hours tracking down this color feature in vim. was > > pleased to find that there was a blue-tone color set. my joints > > are complaining so I'll ask if any of you can give me the right > > terms to google for. I'd like to find a lighter blue or play > > around with the colors. {am assuming that vim is the same across > > the linux and berkeley distributions.} > > In case you're using gvim (a GUI "enclosing" for vim) you can > do the following: Load some text or source code, :syntax on, > then in the menu: Edit -> Color Scheme, and pin the resulting > menu next to the editor window; click the different schemes > to check if one of the predefined 17 schemes looks usable to > you; when done, unpin the menu. This approach is just for > testing and "looking around" in the first place, not for > actual permanent use. :-) > wow! [apologies: I fergot that I had an appt =all day== downtown.] I am seeing this in mutt as all-green. I guess it's not that bad. one question I have may solve the problem of vim displaying all the ^/search terms and displaying them in some color. the default brown is awful, but dark blue isn't much bbetter. So: can I add something to my ~/.vimrc that =limits= the "search" to displaying one term? if I am searching for, say, "the" or I guess /\, I dont want every "the" in my file. I want only one. or one at a time, and not necessarily in color. > > > > PS: OH; the offtopic thing. I'm done, or =very= close with my > > voice by computer program. It's in C with gtk and AFAICT works > > only on linux. ive got a few months of cleaning up before > > release 0.51 will be finished. in the FBSD world, this would > > fit into the accessibility directory. now, the speech-impaired > > who can type will be able to communicate with anyone. VBC requires > > espeak and gvim. > > There are both gvim and /usr/ports/audio/espeak in ports, and > Gtk is also in there. What would cause this software to refuse > working on FreeBSD? > hm. dunno. but then , since I was using FBSD only as a server, I only put in ctwm. no gnome, no gtk, no espeak. actually, my VBC certainly ought to work under gnome and with gtk, espeak, and gvim [as the pop-up editor]. I'll put the tarball on my deadbbs.com site where ive got all my other portballs ... if you or anybody wants to try it out. just gimmee a couple weeeks. the code is seriously messy. --I hang my head... . > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Twenty-six years of service to the Unix community. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 02:39:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70087412 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 02:39:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from m1plsmtpa01-05.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (m1plsmtpa01-05.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D78365 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 02:39:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ethic.thought.org ([209.180.213.209]) by m1plsmtpa01-05.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net with id jed61k0094XeM0101ed781; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:37:07 -0700 Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:37:11 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: Rod Person Subject: Re: somewhat OT ... in parts Message-ID: <20130104023711.GB7368@ethic.thought.org> References: <20130103025305.GA24960@ethic.thought.org> <20130103084422.00004eac.rodperson@rodperson.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130103084422.00004eac.rodperson@rodperson.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 02:39:43 -0000 On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 08:44:22AM -0500, Rod Person wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:53:05 -0800 > Gary Kline wrote: > > > > thanks in advance for a few url's. > > > > I love this color scheme, I use it for everything. There is a vim > specific version...http://ethanschoonover.com/solarized > tx; if it is just plug-and-work, I'll try it out. --note that to use this blue/green scheme, I swiped a couple lines. Voila. > > -- > Just because it can been done, does not mean it should be done. -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Twenty-six years of service to the Unix community. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 05:02:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87769ED6 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:02:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhao6014@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (mail-we0-f169.google.com [74.125.82.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2811F99E for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:02:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t49so7736281wey.0 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:02:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=OT0xWQvbZT9YlgZwmv4uHFLBkZJc3Sy08qYgrkuCgts=; b=gTej/rrxehzf010LsfN2gJKT/QJ/tRL3/C9iAVATIxMysi55Al5XAfIsPfkFburmZI GoOet6TikCfpVFkBuird1W/VkXD1bA3MjAu137+smESgmMEeFGeN0MRLyNG6g/6+MG0c mD3MuAOvzZ2xbzAR+kZ8QyygiJRcr8modAimHtAY99C9QO61dRp+cZZJbw8jPXP3iRJ9 MQ+GH2QxPPTXjIfEq1L3uXpTzCxmPQKqxnNFm9mIAR08N+s8R7KMxhOVUXbGpfr45hnT m+rHPeujv0Ovkb8NDLglYiKmsOwJeqLPdqgXyIio+2bhJS5laJT7YK6Fl98w7ourA0v4 ZyvA== Received: by 10.180.81.39 with SMTP id w7mr80383333wix.15.1357275768909; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:02:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.47.71 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 21:02:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jov Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 13:02:28 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: buffalo wli-uc-gn wireless card sometimes unusable and emit "run0: wcid=xx out of range" To: PseudoCylon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 05:02:56 -0000 feedback: the patch is fine for me=EF=BC=8Cit works great! Thank you very much! do I need send a PR for this problem? 2013/1/1 Jov > thanks very much=EF=BC=8Ci will try the patch. > > jov > =E5=9C=A8 2013-1-1 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=881:19=EF=BC=8C"PseudoCylon" =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > > Message: 13 >> > Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:11:04 +0800 >> > From: Jov >> > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> > Subject: buffalo wli-uc-gn wireless card sometimes unusable and emit >> > "run0: wcid=3Dxx out of range" >> > Message-ID: >> > < >> CADyrUxPrP6OS2mpK51yiwoG-jKwTQ+XpOP48uZQ+Y15_oUr9Sg@mail.gmail.com> >> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1 >> > >> > hi experts: >> > I think the hardware is ok because I can use it in Win7. And in Freebs= d >> > 9.1,it works for sometime,but sometimes after system reboot or I plug >> out & >> > plug in the card it my unusable.on the console it emmit: >> > "run0: wcid=3Dxx out of range" where xx is 91,87 and etc. >> >> Please try attached patch. >> >> Reboot or re-plug-in shouldn't be a cause of the problem. Receiving an >> association ID larger than device's max (64) is the problem. You must >> be using a high-end AP. Reboot or re-plug-in initiate re-association >> and just happen to receive a large association ID. >> >> >> AK >> >> >> --begin patch-- >> >> diff --git a/dev/usb/wlan/if_run.c b/dev/usb/wlan/if_run.c >> index 3d2577f..ed11d97 100644 >> --- a/dev/usb/wlan/if_run.c >> +++ b/dev/usb/wlan/if_run.c >> @@ -2019,7 +2019,8 @@ run_key_set_cb(void *arg) >> wcid =3D 0; /* NB: update WCID0 for group keys */ >> base =3D RT2860_SKEY(RUN_VAP(vap)->rvp_id, k->wk_keyix); >> } else { >> - wcid =3D RUN_AID2WCID(associd); >> + wcid =3D (vap->iv_opmode =3D=3D IEEE80211_M_STA) ? >> + 1 : RUN_AID2WCID(associd); >> base =3D RT2860_PKEY(wcid); >> } >> >> @@ -2374,9 +2375,12 @@ run_newassoc(struct ieee80211_node *ni, int isnew= ) >> struct run_softc *sc =3D ic->ic_ifp->if_softc; >> uint8_t rate; >> uint8_t ridx; >> - uint8_t wcid =3D RUN_AID2WCID(ni->ni_associd); >> + uint8_t wcid; >> int i, j; >> >> + wcid =3D (vap->iv_opmode =3D=3D IEEE80211_M_STA) ? >> + 1 : RUN_AID2WCID(ni->ni_associd); >> + >> if (wcid > RT2870_WCID_MAX) { >> device_printf(sc->sc_dev, "wcid=3D%d out of range\n", wc= id); >> return; >> @@ -3044,8 +3048,12 @@ run_tx(struct run_softc *sc, struct mbuf *m, >> struct ieee80211_node *ni) >> txd->flags =3D qflags; >> txwi =3D (struct rt2860_txwi *)(txd + 1); >> txwi->xflags =3D xflags; >> - txwi->wcid =3D IEEE80211_IS_MULTICAST(wh->i_addr1) ? >> - 0 : RUN_AID2WCID(ni->ni_associd); >> + if (IEEE80211_IS_MULTICAST(wh->i_addr1)) >> + txwi->wcid =3D 0; >> + else { >> + txwi->wcid =3D (vap->iv_opmode =3D=3D IEEE80211_M_STA) ? >> + 1 : RUN_AID2WCID(ni->ni_associd); >> + } >> /* clear leftover garbage bits */ >> txwi->flags =3D 0; >> txwi->txop =3D 0; >> > --=20 jov blog: http:amutu.com/blog From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 05:56:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79A7B2C for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:56:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhao6014@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com (mail-wg0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C95D00 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:56:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id dt10so7237899wgb.15 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:56:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=3bWMNK5zAYUJLRBB7pP6zO/jB/Ov85YhX2RicWtHfO0=; b=Vg+POTbNjr+dr9DnEX1q6DXoH3q1z1R3UnIvETZQXhmovLfwxQkNSjZsRHNpL7wCpt jXSpP31HYB122Z2tGNVLtEjpMu4CZXRoS6W9CY2yb72ob+ANVqIagJ5gd6wStLeeyH6f k96L1miqg8/plhabvEOQpzkhbczLfVi9/XvwgUMB6N+57T4i+2tcIGCX3110jtdPbOq2 v5l+8gziIc2KH+vBMxxKA1qiJy9neHhcZl7pxcjFMGIoPG0aPuFpUf6m7tl8C6evwt0J iN0+29GNG01F4ZXpoaj4CKV80Qr8GfjlUQiFxXApny846VufgMVmfxZ8+SZVNnsvC9Jm wMKg== Received: by 10.194.76.99 with SMTP id j3mr82371114wjw.47.1357278982926; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:56:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.47.71 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 21:56:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jov Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 13:56:02 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: buffalo wli-uc-gn wireless card sometimes unusable and emit "run0: wcid=xx out of range" To: PseudoCylon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 05:56:24 -0000 PR url:http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ query-pr.cgi?pr=3D174963 thanks! 2013/1/4 Jov > feedback: > the patch is fine for me=EF=BC=8Cit works great! Thank you very much! > > do I need send a PR for this problem? > > 2013/1/1 Jov > >> thanks very much=EF=BC=8Ci will try the patch. >> >> jov >> =E5=9C=A8 2013-1-1 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=881:19=EF=BC=8C"PseudoCylon" =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >> >> > Message: 13 >>> > Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:11:04 +0800 >>> > From: Jov >>> > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>> > Subject: buffalo wli-uc-gn wireless card sometimes unusable and emit >>> > "run0: wcid=3Dxx out of range" >>> > Message-ID: >>> > < >>> CADyrUxPrP6OS2mpK51yiwoG-jKwTQ+XpOP48uZQ+Y15_oUr9Sg@mail.gmail.com> >>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1 >>> > >>> > hi experts: >>> > I think the hardware is ok because I can use it in Win7. And in Freeb= sd >>> > 9.1,it works for sometime,but sometimes after system reboot or I plug >>> out & >>> > plug in the card it my unusable.on the console it emmit: >>> > "run0: wcid=3Dxx out of range" where xx is 91,87 and etc. >>> >>> Please try attached patch. >>> >>> Reboot or re-plug-in shouldn't be a cause of the problem. Receiving an >>> association ID larger than device's max (64) is the problem. You must >>> be using a high-end AP. Reboot or re-plug-in initiate re-association >>> and just happen to receive a large association ID. >>> >>> >>> AK >>> >>> >>> --begin patch-- >>> >>> diff --git a/dev/usb/wlan/if_run.c b/dev/usb/wlan/if_run.c >>> index 3d2577f..ed11d97 100644 >>> --- a/dev/usb/wlan/if_run.c >>> +++ b/dev/usb/wlan/if_run.c >>> @@ -2019,7 +2019,8 @@ run_key_set_cb(void *arg) >>> wcid =3D 0; /* NB: update WCID0 for group keys */ >>> base =3D RT2860_SKEY(RUN_VAP(vap)->rvp_id, k->wk_keyix)= ; >>> } else { >>> - wcid =3D RUN_AID2WCID(associd); >>> + wcid =3D (vap->iv_opmode =3D=3D IEEE80211_M_STA) ? >>> + 1 : RUN_AID2WCID(associd); >>> base =3D RT2860_PKEY(wcid); >>> } >>> >>> @@ -2374,9 +2375,12 @@ run_newassoc(struct ieee80211_node *ni, int isne= w) >>> struct run_softc *sc =3D ic->ic_ifp->if_softc; >>> uint8_t rate; >>> uint8_t ridx; >>> - uint8_t wcid =3D RUN_AID2WCID(ni->ni_associd); >>> + uint8_t wcid; >>> int i, j; >>> >>> + wcid =3D (vap->iv_opmode =3D=3D IEEE80211_M_STA) ? >>> + 1 : RUN_AID2WCID(ni->ni_associd); >>> + >>> if (wcid > RT2870_WCID_MAX) { >>> device_printf(sc->sc_dev, "wcid=3D%d out of range\n", >>> wcid); >>> return; >>> @@ -3044,8 +3048,12 @@ run_tx(struct run_softc *sc, struct mbuf *m, >>> struct ieee80211_node *ni) >>> txd->flags =3D qflags; >>> txwi =3D (struct rt2860_txwi *)(txd + 1); >>> txwi->xflags =3D xflags; >>> - txwi->wcid =3D IEEE80211_IS_MULTICAST(wh->i_addr1) ? >>> - 0 : RUN_AID2WCID(ni->ni_associd); >>> + if (IEEE80211_IS_MULTICAST(wh->i_addr1)) >>> + txwi->wcid =3D 0; >>> + else { >>> + txwi->wcid =3D (vap->iv_opmode =3D=3D IEEE80211_M_STA) = ? >>> + 1 : RUN_AID2WCID(ni->ni_associd); >>> + } >>> /* clear leftover garbage bits */ >>> txwi->flags =3D 0; >>> txwi->txop =3D 0; >>> >> > > > -- > jov > blog: http:amutu.com/blog > --=20 jov blog: http:amutu.com/blog From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 07:03:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2B79FC for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 07:03:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB89151 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 07:03:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2DA73CC44; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 08:03:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r0473dWT001979; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 08:03:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 08:03:39 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Gary Kline Subject: Re: somewhat OT ... in parts Message-Id: <20130104080339.13b51546.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20130104022738.GA7368@ethic.thought.org> References: <20130103025305.GA24960@ethic.thought.org> <20130103072741.c02a1150.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130104022738.GA7368@ethic.thought.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 07:03:45 -0000 On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:27:38 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > one question I have may solve the problem of vim displaying > all the ^/search terms and displaying them in some color. > the default brown is awful, but dark blue isn't much bbetter. If you try :colorscheme blue you can see that the results have orange background with dark text (maybe black?), while the editor background is blue (as the name of the color scheme suggests). > So: can I add something to my ~/.vimrc that =limits= > the "search" to displaying one term? if I am searching for, > say, "the" or I guess /\, I dont want every "the" in my > file. I want only one. or one at a time, and not necessarily > in color. If you have :set hlsearch activated, all (visible) matches will be highlighted, and the cursor will be placed at the first match. I don't see an option to highlight the _next_ result only. However, if you do _not_ set hlsearch, searching and continuing searching will not highlight anything, instead let the cursor skip to the next match (tried here with "gvim /COPYRIGHT", /this, /, /, / and so on), with :set nohlsearch for testing. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 09:19:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D433CD for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 09:19:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f45.google.com (mail-bk0-f45.google.com [209.85.214.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836327CB for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 09:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f45.google.com with SMTP id jk13so7052538bkc.32 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 01:19:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=y68P8eP98HPdV75IpXG2PJ5Rvwm1YlLqneLzHYeH238=; b=ZnuY8i2M7gOy3RpnQG6Cw7y6N9Yv/0w7f4Pj6S4np7/AUaul0sW/jYJ4RVKbuooJ3R JtrqElws2jbzLAwgcAHxG6OJZFeLLIy+tq+bqM+vZ+c4GWRorfjypdI6Ag2apKciHmER EJu98XUDatUmzceT4BkrIXG00vWTNY7paxlzfi6hcEMPBGFZ1SbHyIFlr65N8mDkMV1e wOmusXqfwcsuf1jrP44QQHmoDcWwHSxKXcwbaY5hpKR8VYKnrFFktw7WFZS/s22CfFWq AZCxcdckau/VaOw/2HTtdcCuowGRROrEz0rFZZMXR+OfxsNB3+tcxyDdmDk3YZhxFAUG DyFA== X-Received: by 10.204.11.208 with SMTP id u16mr26200724bku.81.1357291188943; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 01:19:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.130] (mau.donbass.com. [92.242.127.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o7sm35839060bkv.13.2013.01.04.01.19.46 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 04 Jan 2013 01:19:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50E69EA8.5000301@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:19:36 +0200 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Felder Subject: Re: FreeBSD: GIT instaed of SVN? References: <50E3F07E.7000507@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20130102073536.3c4d4f29@tech304.office.supranet.net> <20130103123022.5d0b3648@tech304.office.supranet.net> In-Reply-To: <20130103123022.5d0b3648@tech304.office.supranet.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Joseph Mingrone , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 09:19:51 -0000 03.01.2013 20:30, Mark Felder: > On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:24:31 -0400 > Joseph Mingrone wrote: > >> A little of topic, but Fossil is BSD licensed. > > It also would work poorly as an SCM for FreeBSD because everything would be in a giant sqlite database :( Why this is bad? Even for SVN I prefer bdb backend as it works faster and better regardless what SVN authors say. -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 13:01:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20715E01 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 13:01:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18B613C for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 13:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tr6uN-0002U0-Sr for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 14:01:59 +0100 Received: from p5dcd75d1.dip.t-dialin.net ([93.205.117.209]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 14:01:59 +0100 Received: from jumper99 by p5dcd75d1.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 14:01:59 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Helmut Schneider" Subject: Trying to update from 9.0 to 9.1 via svn Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 13:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 25 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5dcd75d1.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: XanaNews/1.19.1.320 X-Ref: news.gmane.org ~XNS:00000071 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:01:48 -0000 Hi, I fetched sources via $ sudo svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src/ Checked out revision 244992. $ I then recompiled and installed the kernel according to http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html $ ls -la /boot/kernel/kernel -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15622342 Jan 3 19:57 /boot/kernel/kernel $ But after reboot uname prints FreeBSD BSDHelmut964 9.0-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p5 #9 r244992M: Thu Jan 3 19:57:37 CET 2013 root@BSDHelmut964:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 Why? Thanks, Helmut From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 14:10:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBC1C16 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 14:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CAF1396 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 14:10:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.15]) by ltcfislmsgpa03.fnfis.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r04E9tjr001333 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 4 Jan 2013 08:09:55 -0600 Received: from [10.0.0.102] (10.14.152.61) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.309.2; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 08:09:54 -0600 Subject: Re: somewhat OT ... in parts MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Devin Teske In-Reply-To: <20130104080339.13b51546.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 06:09:53 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <20130103025305.GA24960@ethic.thought.org> <20130103072741.c02a1150.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130104022738.GA7368@ethic.thought.org> <20130104080339.13b51546.freebsd@edvax.de> To: Polytropon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.61] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2013-01-04_04:2013-01-04,2013-01-04,1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: Gary Kline , FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Devin Teske List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 14:10:06 -0000 On Jan 3, 2013, at 11:03 PM, Polytropon wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:27:38 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: >> one question I have may solve the problem of vim displaying >> all the ^/search terms and displaying them in some color.=20 >> the default brown is awful, but dark blue isn't much bbetter. >=20 > If you try :colorscheme blue you can see that the results have > orange background with dark text (maybe black?), while the editor > background is blue (as the name of the color scheme suggests). >=20 >=20 >=20 >> So: can I add something to my ~/.vimrc that =3Dlimits=3D >> the "search" to displaying one term? if I am searching for, >> say, "the" or I guess /\, I dont want every "the" in my=20 >> file. I want only one. or one at a time, and not necessarily >> in color. >=20 > If you have :set hlsearch activated, all (visible) matches will > be highlighted, :set hls :set nohls for short to enable/disable (respectively). > and the cursor will be placed at the first match. >=20 On a side note, there's also :set incsearch That will make you jump ahead as you type (I personally don't care for it). > I don't see an option to highlight the _next_ result only. However, > if you do _not_ set hlsearch, searching and continuing searching > will not highlight anything, instead let the cursor skip to the > next match (tried here with "gvim /COPYRIGHT", /this, /, /, / and > so on), with :set nohlsearch for testing. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia= l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an= d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma= nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware= that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie= w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 14:10:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FB5CB6 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 14:10:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mattr-lists@eagle.ca) Received: from cohiba.eagle.ca (cohiba.eagle.ca [208.70.104.203]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CBE73C8 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 14:10:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18955 invoked by uid 89); 4 Jan 2013 14:10:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO MattRauchPC) (mattr-lists@eagle.ca@208.70.104.100) by cohiba.eagle.ca with ESMTPA; 4 Jan 2013 14:10:45 -0000 From: "Matt Rauch" To: "'Ilya Kazakevich'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: Looking for info on how to install and configure suPHP on FreeBSD 8 Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 09:10:41 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 Thread-Index: Ac3qENeHEAA0vd40QSKhoTRQZSCiZAAc91nA Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 14:10:46 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of > Ilya Kazakevich > Sent: January-03-13 7:17 PM > To: Matt Rauch > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Looking for info on how to install and configure > suPHP on FreeBSD 8 > > http://www.freshports.org/www/suphp/ > > Is not it what are you looking for? > I guess what I'm looking for is not only how to do the ports install (which I think I can do without issue), but also how to implement it so that it is being used. The simple port install won't make that work right out of the box will it? Thanks, Matt Rauch From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 15:47:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7E9938 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:47:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from axelbsd@ymail.com) Received: from nm1-vm7.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm1-vm7.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.136.218.86]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2B649AC for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.137.12.191] by nm1.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jan 2013 15:47:09 -0000 Received: from [208.71.42.207] by tm12.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jan 2013 15:47:09 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp218.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jan 2013 15:47:09 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1357314429; bh=zQkLHfNb2Wbdgu1AM8g8Xr15FSkij9uy9BMHtnbhZeY=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Received:Received:MIME-Version:Received:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=ElCeH3Az2GeJ6c70IHkY3TRlme5CTT4M8F40ytLcOd5hxQuSVuMs+Fxr8VEHzMX5wrgGI4tWexJ8xP9kybWdSWP2Lz9RtP/GmafNdt7CXqVw3FF+1CFZPaLH+BcY9jazlcM6ndBGqnzZ8w2pKRg2MEbUkwDC8G6trZeECgJCXQM= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 75057.6509.bm@smtp218.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: UhGFpdIVM1lYs1_AaU5u0pxg9kdzjTvFT23W5vaTymx_sll qWwNnXaD7HdvPZRbOtBLPc09LeBpA26NWiY2FkqmPWU9vbQ.lrCPNFgNHTKB c9u0tYOni9iPMhHrO0SzhlzLhh8hfiTz7ND5sOFZs8386xXbcHpoNbUvOA8J cLEDl0Vp0nI8KHt4lueTNExNjrnlxGwlS.OPRF52tY3wiWe0oxTj.Z30lPOh ka0WJ6v_5w.1_jAV.PzcYinzKYsQoJCyttE.ZeUgkADkNvTo0.oEYEdFzutW 7IYlxtnbSCvN6_CpypaNm5vRgHkJ4DFe0uoPboMsXBzxJ2CtH_lFLPW4nmRP lW7lCGTVPZbfXpdEpso.YNvEH0BKc7Zs_1UXm2wPNmWgbHUGF9ibWiH9BWTt IZShyZYsBGE.xhlfT3D9AnMf6oPJFyvvAQkbYaiJ5Wi3IY8KuHi04eRdVlDX o0fFYyxMGZXwDBN568zu865gkS1h8i9ZjnGiyd0DvvcM8AHOiBfnvyTABNhp G1xHTHw-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: S65s63SswBDjU54Gjqw2GSWlZmfgiEU_X3tN1_9u Received: from mail-ie0-f169.google.com (axelbsd@209.85.223.169 with plain) by smtp218.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 04 Jan 2013 07:47:08 -0800 PST Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id c14so19847308ieb.14 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 07:47:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.11.136 with SMTP id q8mr41512093igb.87.1357314428371; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 07:47:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.17.198 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 07:46:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Alexandre Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:46:48 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Trying to update from 9.0 to 9.1 via svn To: Helmut Schneider Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:47:18 -0000 On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Helmut Schneider wrote: > Hi, > > I fetched sources via > > $ sudo svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src/ > Checked out revision 244992. > $ > > I then recompiled and installed the kernel according to > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html > > $ ls -la /boot/kernel/kernel > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15622342 Jan 3 19:57 /boot/kernel/kernel > $ > > But after reboot uname prints > > FreeBSD BSDHelmut964 9.0-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p5 #9 r244992M: > Thu Jan 3 19:57:37 CET 2013 > root@BSDHelmut964:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > Why? > > Thanks, Helmut > > Hi Helmut, Have you rebuilt world before compile and install your new 9.1 kernel ? Your base system installed is always in 9.0. See handbook, this article will help you to do it : http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html Regards, Alexandre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 15:52:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903BEB27 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:52:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F819E9 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:52:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tr9ZK-0002A2-Po for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:52:26 +0100 Received: from p5dcd75d1.dip.t-dialin.net ([93.205.117.209]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:52:26 +0100 Received: from jumper99 by p5dcd75d1.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:52:26 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Helmut Schneider" Subject: Re: Trying to update from 9.0 to 9.1 via svn Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:51:55 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5dcd75d1.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: XanaNews/1.19.1.320 X-Ref: news.gmane.org ~XNS:00000072 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:52:16 -0000 Alexandre wrote: > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Helmut Schneider > wrote: > > > > I fetched sources via > > > > $ sudo svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src/ > > Checked out revision 244992. > > $ > > > > I then recompiled and installed the kernel according to > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html > > > > $ ls -la /boot/kernel/kernel > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15622342 Jan 3 19:57 /boot/kernel/kernel > > $ > > > > But after reboot uname prints > > > > FreeBSD BSDHelmut964 9.0-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p5 #9 > > r244992M: Thu Jan 3 19:57:37 CET 2013 > > root@BSDHelmut964:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > > Why? > > > > Thanks, Helmut > > Have you rebuilt world before compile and install your new 9.1 kernel > ? Yes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 15:58:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB496D73 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:58:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D148A4B for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:58:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r04FwRNa069474 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:58:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id r04FwRiU069471; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:58:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:58:27 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Helmut Schneider Subject: Re: Trying to update from 9.0 to 9.1 via svn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="2055831798-882514196-1357315107=:41917" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.fig.ol.no Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:58:31 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --2055831798-882514196-1357315107=:41917 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:51-0000, Helmut Schneider wrote: > Alexandre wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Helmut Schneider > > wrote: > > > > > > I fetched sources via > > > > > > $ sudo svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src/ > > > Checked out revision 244992. > > > $ > > > > > > I then recompiled and installed the kernel according to > > > > > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html > > > > > > $ ls -la /boot/kernel/kernel > > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15622342 Jan 3 19:57 /boot/kernel/kernel > > > $ > > > > > > But after reboot uname prints > > > > > > FreeBSD BSDHelmut964 9.0-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p5 #9 > > > r244992M: Thu Jan 3 19:57:37 CET 2013 > > > root@BSDHelmut964:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > > > > Why? > > > > > > Thanks, Helmut > > > > Have you rebuilt world before compile and install your new 9.1 kernel > > ? > > Yes. I have a question: Was /usr/src populated with 9.0 sources prior to the svn operation? If you have the time and bandwidth, I would delete everything inside /usr/src, e.g. rm -Rf /usr/src/* /usr/src/.??* and retry the checkout, i.e. sudo svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ --2055831798-882514196-1357315107=:41917-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 16:24:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679B45C1 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:24:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18FB1C34 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:24:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TrA4s-0000ct-3I for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:25:02 +0100 Received: from p5dcd75d1.dip.t-dialin.net ([93.205.117.209]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:25:02 +0100 Received: from jumper99 by p5dcd75d1.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:25:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Helmut Schneider" Subject: Re: Trying to update from 9.0 to 9.1 via svn Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:24:33 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 61 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5dcd75d1.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: XanaNews/1.19.1.320 X-Ref: news.gmane.org ~XNS:00000073 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:24:51 -0000 Trond Endrestøl wrote: > On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:51-0000, Helmut Schneider wrote: > > > Alexandre wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Helmut Schneider > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I fetched sources via > > > > > > > > $ sudo svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src/ > > > > Checked out revision 244992. > > > > $ > > > > > > > > I then recompiled and installed the kernel according to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html > > > > > > > > $ ls -la /boot/kernel/kernel > > > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15622342 Jan 3 19:57 > > > > /boot/kernel/kernel $ > > > > > > > > But after reboot uname prints > > > > > > > > FreeBSD BSDHelmut964 9.0-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p5 #9 > > > > r244992M: Thu Jan 3 19:57:37 CET 2013 > > > > root@BSDHelmut964:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > > > > > > Why? > > > > > > > > Thanks, Helmut > > > > > > Have you rebuilt world before compile and install your new 9.1 > > > kernel ? > > > > Yes. > > I have a question: > > Was /usr/src populated with 9.0 sources prior to the svn operation? > > If you have the time and bandwidth, I would delete everything inside > /usr/src, e.g. > > rm -Rf /usr/src/* /usr/src/.??* > > and retry the checkout, i.e. > > sudo svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src Did so, too. It's so frustrating, I mean, I compile kernel and world since 6.0 and never had similar issues. What makes me a bit nervous is that this happens on two different machines. And why is the revision (r244992) of the kernel ident higher than the release revision (r243710[1])? http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 17:45:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C695424 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:45:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89F4F28 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r04HjPAT070055 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:45:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id r04HjPop070052; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:45:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:45:25 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Helmut Schneider Subject: Re: Trying to update from 9.0 to 9.1 via svn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="2055831798-209584057-1357321525=:41917" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.fig.ol.no Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:45:31 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --2055831798-209584057-1357321525=:41917 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:24-0000, Helmut Schneider wrote: > Trond Endrestøl wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:51-0000, Helmut Schneider wrote: > > > > > Alexandre wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Helmut Schneider > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I fetched sources via > > > > > > > > > > $ sudo svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src/ > > > > > Checked out revision 244992. > > > > > $ > > > > > > > > > > I then recompiled and installed the kernel according to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html > > > > > > > > > > $ ls -la /boot/kernel/kernel > > > > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15622342 Jan 3 19:57 > > > > > /boot/kernel/kernel $ > > > > > > > > > > But after reboot uname prints > > > > > > > > > > FreeBSD BSDHelmut964 9.0-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p5 #9 > > > > > r244992M: Thu Jan 3 19:57:37 CET 2013 > > > > > root@BSDHelmut964:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > > > > > > > > Why? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Helmut > > > > > > > > Have you rebuilt world before compile and install your new 9.1 > > > > kernel ? > > > > > > Yes. > > > > I have a question: > > > > Was /usr/src populated with 9.0 sources prior to the svn operation? > > > > If you have the time and bandwidth, I would delete everything inside > > /usr/src, e.g. > > > > rm -Rf /usr/src/* /usr/src/.??* > > > > and retry the checkout, i.e. > > > > sudo svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src > > Did so, too. It's so frustrating, I mean, I compile kernel and world > since 6.0 and never had similar issues. What makes me a bit nervous is > that this happens on two different machines. And why is the revision > (r244992) of the kernel ident higher than the release revision > (r243710[1])? Let me use the output of svn info from stable/9 as an example: root@enterprise:/usr/src # svn info Path: . Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src URL: svn://svn.ximalas.info/freebsd/base/stable/9 Repository Root: svn://svn.ximalas.info/freebsd/base Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f Revision: 245035 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: pfg Last Changed Rev: 245025 Last Changed Date: 2013-01-04 05:03:21 +0100 (Fri, 04 Jan 2013) The uname string of the kernel includes the revision number contained in the Revision line as shown above. svn keeps global revision numbers unlike cvs which uses revision number per each file. All of FreeBSD base source code resides in one giant repository. Thus changes made in, say, /base/head, i.e. -CURRENT, affects other "branches", say, /base/releng/9.1. It would make more sense if the uname string referred to the Last Changed Rev line. (Yes, I run my own svn mirror. It saves bandwidth when I issue svn log -v to look at the recent commit logs.) BTW, do you nuke the contents of /usr/obj prior to recompiling the system? The command rm -Rf /usr/obj/* should accomplish this rather well. Out of old habit I like keep everything clean before I issue buildworld + buildkernel with -DNO_CLEAN. -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ --2055831798-209584057-1357321525=:41917-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 17:48:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA484CE for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:48:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailnull@mips.inka.de) Received: from mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (mail-in-09.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041AFF3F for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:48:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-in-19-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-19-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.36]) by mx.arcor.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D23D1975A3 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:14:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-in-15.arcor-online.net (mail-in-15.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.55]) by mail-in-19-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80AB63F83DD for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:14:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (dslb-188-105-086-158.pools.arcor-ip.net [188.105.86.158]) by mail-in-15.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 584471AB530 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:14:03 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-15.arcor-online.net 584471AB530 Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r04HE2QY038185 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:14:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mailnull@lorvorc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r04HE2xt038184 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:14:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mailnull) From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) Subject: bsdinstall misaligns partitions Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Originator: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:48:58 -0000 Shouldn't bsdinstall attempt to align partitions on 4k boundaries both for the benefit of 4k drives and flash storage? I just installed 9.1R i386 for fun and practice, in fact I installed it several times, and I played around with the partitioning options. * The modern GPT scheme reserves 34 sectors at the start of the disk. Your newly created partitions will start at offset 34 and will therefor be misaligned. I ended up configuring a 63 kB freebsd-boot partition, which ensures that the following partitions are aligned. * The old MBR scheme is even worse. The FreeBSD slice will start at sector 63, guaranteeing that any partitions contained within will be misaligned. There is no way to fix this, unless you shell out and run fdisk manually. * Funnily enough, the ancient BSD "dangerously dedicated" scheme is the only one that out of the box does not misalign partitions. I'm presumably not the first one to notice this issue, and yes, I'm mostly just venting. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 18:13:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB44CC1 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:13:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com (mail-ob0-f179.google.com [209.85.214.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969B8D4 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:13:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id x4so15124189obh.10 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:12:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=ZgeL2U6hrgKU+K+lvRaMBvFat14Py0ggBBhSpAM/qnU=; b=gawnO5Oyou3gU/xVKYARKeffEZIEQp8o0FH9V6ycgzSLy5moSe25c2EHWMs8A0lTRL OF0DomfH5G4kyBI72cO9Pl9ozKk6x+0wJaXZj3mx3vjsI/DyV5cQizlHm+4NLyR0r8Ea ujrvFumc1vblZ1eAzzfDxi+9/Awl40RKmoYrahG8iYqkIy3uu17/yj3DxKV7oU/1Oi/L hmcW/uX/f3ngZvERu9pkD4zJFQWfnjypUrgxHygUT7lafHOuVg2yxwgN+nqTNPsuOs3R dt2GhurvMAg/kBDkwmYyI3Fvyg0wg+U14eYoo7Esh1Z2v93v2Rdaq0t5UIdBtzItHF3s p5gw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.157.44 with SMTP id wj12mr39561368obb.41.1357323176029; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:12:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.119.9 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 10:12:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 10:12:55 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bsdinstall misaligns partitions From: Michael Sierchio To: Christian Weisgerber X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnrgGFAe8yBQpyWgltTnE6UXLMz+hS9zv5zRxEk3l0d8+qAt4iavbDDgOyY5jkvWoH6I7rL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 18:13:03 -0000 On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Shouldn't bsdinstall attempt to align partitions on 4k boundaries > both for the benefit of 4k drives and flash storage? > > That's rather up to you. AFAIK it attempts to create partitions that preserve "cylinder" boundaries - which are generally a rather obsolete concept, even for drives with spindles. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 18:41:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7574F213 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:41:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3D21B5 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:41:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r04IfFHM070497 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Jan 2013 19:41:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id r04IfFfa070494; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 19:41:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 19:41:15 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Helmut Schneider Subject: Re: Trying to update from 9.0 to 9.1 via svn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="2055831798-1142506745-1357324875=:41917" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.fig.ol.no Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 18:41:20 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --2055831798-1142506745-1357324875=:41917 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:51-0000, Helmut Schneider wrote: > Alexandre wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Helmut Schneider > > wrote: > > > > > > I fetched sources via > > > > > > $ sudo svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src/ > > > Checked out revision 244992. > > > $ > > > > > > I then recompiled and installed the kernel according to > > > > > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html > > > > > > $ ls -la /boot/kernel/kernel > > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15622342 Jan 3 19:57 /boot/kernel/kernel > > > $ > > > > > > But after reboot uname prints > > > > > > FreeBSD BSDHelmut964 9.0-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p5 #9 > > > r244992M: Thu Jan 3 19:57:37 CET 2013 > > > root@BSDHelmut964:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > > > > Why? > > > > > > Thanks, Helmut > > > > Have you rebuilt world before compile and install your new 9.1 kernel > > ? > > Yes. Upon reading the help message of svnversion, I noticed the revision number will contain the capital letter M after the digits if the working copy is modified. Somehow you must have changed one or more of the files kept under version control. If this wasn't your intention, you might want to revert any changes made. svn revert -R /usr/src should do the trick. -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ --2055831798-1142506745-1357324875=:41917-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 19:50:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B263EBC for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 19:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce13adu@news.allesguenstiger.com) Received: from smtpbzcg.emailsoftware.net (smtpbzcg.emailsoftware.net [78.47.227.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D0C93F1 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 19:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tadao.adrom.lan (HELO santino.aem-asp.de) ([192.168.0.68]) by smtpbzcg.emailsoftware.net with ESMTP; 04 Jan 2013 17:15:11 +0100 X-MID: 187263566 X-Mailer: Gina-Mailer 1.1 (build 187263566) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:15:10 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: TrafficCaptain Subject: Advertising Request Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-LID: 2145 X-CID: 952 X-PID: 8769190 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mz@trafficcaptain.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 19:50:04 -0000 Hello, I represent TrafficCaptain a performance network focused entirely on the gaming industry. In our offers you can find well-known game developers like Big Point, Ubisoft, Travian, Kabam, Farbflut etc. We are active in 24 countries with more than 100 offers. We are currently looking for premium publishers to promote our performance based programs. Are you interested in taking a look at our offer, then log in at http://www.trafficcaptain.com/ or I can send you a PDF-file. Have you heard about our new innovation? Most websites have 10% mobile traffic, but they cannot use it, since neither the website nor the offers on the page are designed for mobile surfers. With our innovation, the "mobile switch" you can monetize this mobile traffic with only one! Line code. This is how we can offer your mobile surfers targeted Offers which can be used on their mobile device (phone, tablet, ...). I would be very pleased to get in touch with you and talk more about the opportunities created by working together. Best Regards, Paula Bremann TrafficCaptain E: pb@trafficcaptain.com P: +49-40-23706-802 www.trafficCaptain.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 21:30:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B3991B5 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 21:30:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E335A1F for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 21:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r04LUiw4007960; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 14:30:44 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) with ESMTP id r04LUibu007957; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 14:30:44 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 14:30:44 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Christian Weisgerber Subject: Re: bsdinstall misaligns partitions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 04 Jan 2013 14:30:45 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 21:30:46 -0000 On Fri, 4 Jan 2013, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Shouldn't bsdinstall attempt to align partitions on 4k boundaries > both for the benefit of 4k drives and flash storage? I think the latest version does. > I just installed 9.1R i386 for fun and practice, in fact I installed > it several times, and I played around with the partitioning options. > > * The modern GPT scheme reserves 34 sectors at the start of the disk. > Your newly created partitions will start at offset 34 and will > therefor be misaligned. I ended up configuring a 63 kB freebsd-boot > partition, which ensures that the following partitions are aligned. > > * The old MBR scheme is even worse. The FreeBSD slice will start > at sector 63, guaranteeing that any partitions contained within > will be misaligned. There is no way to fix this, unless you > shell out and run fdisk manually. Even worse news: you can't fix it manually. Both fdisk and gpart are slaves to the kernel code that deals with MBR layouts, and will align to the old CHS values. I have not found a way to use FreeBSD to create an MBR slice that starts at 1M, block 2048. The CHS alignment always forces it to block 2079, a multiple of 63. However, gpart's -a alignment flag will offset BSD partitions within the slice so they are aligned. > * Funnily enough, the ancient BSD "dangerously dedicated" scheme > is the only one that out of the box does not misalign partitions. The filesystems don't begin at the start of the slice anyway. There is a bsdlabel there. > I'm presumably not the first one to notice this issue, and yes, I'm > mostly just venting. A way to override the CHS alignment would be welcome. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 22:02:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D45673 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 22:02:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from p3plsmtpa08-07.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa08-07.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.193.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C4EB15 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 22:02:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ethic.thought.org ([209.180.213.209]) by p3plsmtpa08-07.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with id jxzf1k00D4XeM0101xzgRe; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 14:59:40 -0700 Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 13:59:45 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: Polytropon Subject: Re: somewhat OT ... in parts Message-ID: <20130104215945.GA23933@ethic.thought.org> References: <20130103025305.GA24960@ethic.thought.org> <20130103072741.c02a1150.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130104022738.GA7368@ethic.thought.org> <20130104080339.13b51546.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130104080339.13b51546.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 22:02:16 -0000 On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 08:03:39AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:27:38 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > > one question I have may solve the problem of vim displaying > > all the ^/search terms and displaying them in some color. > > the default brown is awful, but dark blue isn't much bbetter. > > If you try :colorscheme blue you can see that the results have > orange background with dark text (maybe black?), while the editor > background is blue (as the name of the color scheme suggests). > > > > > So: can I add something to my ~/.vimrc that =limits= > > the "search" to displaying one term? if I am searching for, > > say, "the" or I guess /\, I dont want every "the" in my > > file. I want only one. or one at a time, and not necessarily > > in color. > > If you have :set hlsearch activated, all (visible) matches will > be highlighted, and the cursor will be placed at the first match. > > I don't see an option to highlight the _next_ result only. However, > if you do _not_ set hlsearch, searching and continuing searching > will not highlight anything, instead let the cursor skip to the > next match (tried here with "gvim /COPYRIGHT", /this, /, /, / and > so on), with :set nohlsearch for testing. > Hm. there must be "something" in Muttrc. I dont see it in my local ~/.muttrc; this "something" is controlling every /search term and highlighting it. the regular vim /tmp/foofile.c /tmp/footext is fine. it's only in mutt that highlights EVERY instance that I'm searching for. I'll figure it out eventually if you don't know offhand. or anybody else. maybe I should just find keith bostic's newvi; see if they have it for linux; theyve got everything else... {grumble} thanks, polyt. gary > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Twenty-six years of service to the Unix community. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 22:22:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51592924 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 22:22:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naddy@mips.inka.de) Received: from mail-in-05.arcor-online.net (mail-in-05.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B95C05 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 22:22:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-in-16-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-16-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.33]) by mx.arcor.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CCCE44AC; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 23:22:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-in-03.arcor-online.net (mail-in-03.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.43]) by mail-in-16-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655FD21203D; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 23:22:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (dslb-188-105-086-158.pools.arcor-ip.net [188.105.86.158]) by mail-in-03.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCE0ED877B; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 23:22:31 +0100 (CET) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-03.arcor-online.net DCE0ED877B Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r04MMVAK045175; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 23:22:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from naddy@localhost) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r04MMVap045174; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 23:22:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from naddy) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 23:22:31 +0100 From: Christian Weisgerber To: Warren Block Subject: Re: bsdinstall misaligns partitions Message-ID: <20130104222231.GA44585@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 22:22:40 -0000 Warren Block: > > * Funnily enough, the ancient BSD "dangerously dedicated" scheme > > is the only one that out of the box does not misalign partitions. > > The filesystems don't begin at the start of the slice anyway. There is > a bsdlabel there. Yes and no. If you look at the bsdlabel(8) output, the size of 'c' is exactly the same as the sum of the sizes of the other partitions, as well as exactly the size of the fdisk slice. There is no additional reserved space for the label. So where does the disklabel hide? FFS1 (FFS2) leaves 8 kB (64 kB) of space at the start of _every_ filesystem. The first 8 kB of the slice--overlapping with the start of 'c' and the start of 'a'--hold boot1, the disklabel, and boot2. If you hexdump /boot/boot2, you'll notice that the first 0x114 bytes are zeroed out; those 276 bytes are exactly where the disklabel is located on disk. See and . -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 22:29:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1429DAFD for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 22:29:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from smtpauth22.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpauth22.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA1E7CB6 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 22:29:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6064 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2013 22:29:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (209.180.213.209) by smtpauth22.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.44) with ESMTP; 04 Jan 2013 22:29:34 -0000 Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 14:29:39 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: Devin Teske Subject: Re: somewhat OT ... in parts Message-ID: <20130104222939.GB23933@ethic.thought.org> References: <20130103025305.GA24960@ethic.thought.org> <20130103072741.c02a1150.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130104022738.GA7368@ethic.thought.org> <20130104080339.13b51546.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Polytropon , FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 22:29:42 -0000 On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 06:09:53AM -0800, Devin Teske wrote: > > On Jan 3, 2013, at 11:03 PM, Polytropon wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:27:38 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > >> one question I have may solve the problem of vim displaying > >> all the ^/search terms and displaying them in some color. > >> the default brown is awful, but dark blue isn't much bbetter. > > > > If you try :colorscheme blue you can see that the results have > > orange background with dark text (maybe black?), while the editor > > background is blue (as the name of the color scheme suggests). > > > > > > > >> So: can I add something to my ~/.vimrc that =limits= > >> the "search" to displaying one term? if I am searching for, > >> say, "the" or I guess /\, I dont want every "the" in my > >> file. I want only one. or one at a time, and not necessarily > >> in color. > > > > If you have :set hlsearch activated, all (visible) matches will > > be highlighted, > > :set hls > :set nohls > > for short to enable/disable (respectively). > > > > and the cursor will be placed at the first match. > > > YES! well, at least it works when I reply in mutt --which ive got set to use vim. the "set" strings immediately vanished from deep blue ... in other words, I can read the reply much more easily. I put the ":set nohls" in my ~/.muttrc and got an error when I exec'd mutt. I'll try without the colon. > On a side note, there's also :set incsearch > > That will make you jump ahead as you type (I personally don't care for it). > right; I see that "incsearch" jumps ahead to the next /search term [.] I can see a use if you are searching for, say "/\" or "/\" , maybe. > > I don't see an option to highlight the _next_ result only. However, > > if you do _not_ set hlsearch, searching and continuing searching > > will not highlight anything, instead let the cursor skip to the > > next match (tried here with "gvim /COPYRIGHT", /this, /, /, / and > > so on), with :set nohlsearch for testing. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Polytropon > > Magdeburg, Germany > > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _____________ > The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Twenty-six years of service to the Unix community. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 22:32:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61268CD4 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 22:32:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@chthonixia.net) Received: from www5.pairlite.com (www5.pairlite.com [64.130.10.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400F7CDD for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 22:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whisperer.chthonixia.net (unknown [184.152.30.105]) by www5.pairlite.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AAA6D2E2D0 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:32:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:32:48 -0500 From: Joe Altman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update: fale? Message-ID: <20130104223248.GA63681@whisperer.chthonixia.net> References: <20130102002110.GA7209@whisperer.chthonixia.net> <50E59AC4.5020203@martinlaabs.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50E59AC4.5020203@martinlaabs.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 22:32:20 -0000 On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 03:50:44PM +0100, Martin Laabs wrote: > Hi, > > On 01/02/13 01:21, Joe Altman wrote: > > Greetings, list. I have the following error; though I can load > > update5.FreeBSD.org in a browser: > > [...] > > maybe you use a release that is not supported by freebsd-update. Run > "uname -r" an compare the release with that you see when looking at > http://update4.freebsd.org/ > > If it is not there you can not use freebsd-update. Yes; I realized that after I revisited the man page and handbook; somehow I managed to miss that initially. I'm currently using 9.1-PRERELEASE. Now I am left to wonder how that state will last; ISTM that eventually 9.1 will be supported by freebsd-update but I cannot tell when that might happen. Given that CVSUP is going away soon, I can't see reinstalling it just for this unnecessary upgrade. Since I appear to be stuck between things, I have three questions: 1) Is there any way to guesstimate how long until 9.1 is supported by freebsd-update? 2) Am I correct in assuming that there is no good reason (security concerns, for instance) to update right now? I seem to have no problems with my system; it runs fine. 3) Does freebsd-update really require at least a Gig of space in /var for a major or minor upgrade? If so, it looks like I may as well reinstall the OS, since I never anticipated needing that much in /var. At this point, given the amount of 'portupgrade -fr' I'll need to do, it might consume less time to start from scratch. Thanks for the followup, and best regards, Joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 4 23:39:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93BE88A4 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 23:39:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53041E9C for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 23:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mbook.home (pool-173-79-208-244.washdc.fios.verizon.net [173.79.208.244]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r04NcwwD066813 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:38:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) From: Doug Hardie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Problem upgrading to 9.1-Release Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:38:53 -0800 Message-Id: <299E9D35-959E-4074-BEC8-7B335C177F7A@lafn.org> To: FreeBSD Mailing List Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 23:39:07 -0000 I have upgraded my development system to 9.1 without any problems. This = system maintains kernel source and I build a new kernel with a couple = extra options there. The other systems mount /usr/src and /usr/obj from = it and do the install. The first one to be upgraded had no problem with = make installkernel. Rebooted and ran mergemaster -p just fine. However = make installworld dies within a couple seconds with the following error: install -o root -g wheel -m 444 libc_pic.a /usr/lib gencat be_BY.UTF-8.cat /usr/src/lib/libc/nls/be_BY.UTF-8.msg gencat: No such file or directory *** [be_BY.UTF-8.cat] Error code 1 /usr/bin/gencat exists. However, ktrace of the make shows: 3347 make CALL execve(0xbfbfd1c8,0x28c35f14,0x28421180) 3347 make NAMI "/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin/gencat" 3347 make RET execve -1 errno 2 No such file or directory 3347 make CALL execve(0xbfbfd1c8,0x28c35f14,0x28421180) 3347 make NAMI "/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin/gencat" 3347 make RET execve -1 errno 2 No such file or directory 3347 make CALL execve(0xbfbfd1c8,0x28c35f14,0x28421180) 3347 make NAMI "/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/games/gencat" 3347 make RET execve -1 errno 2 No such file or directory 3347 make CALL execve(0xbfbfd1c8,0x28c35f14,0x28421180) 3347 make NAMI "/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/sbin/gencat" 3347 make RET execve -1 errno 2 No such file or directory 3347 make CALL execve(0xbfbfd1c8,0x28c35f14,0x28421180) 3347 make NAMI "/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/gencat" 3347 make RET execve -1 errno 2 No such file or directory 3347 make CALL execve(0xbfbfd1c8,0x28c35f14,0x28421180) 3347 make NAMI "/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/games/gencat" 3347 make RET execve -1 errno 2 No such file or directory 3347 make CALL execve(0xbfbfd1c8,0x28c35f14,0x28421180) 3347 make NAMI "/tmp/install.CuIzLuBX/gencat" 3347 make RET execve -1 errno 2 No such file or directory 3347 make CALL write(0x2,0x28c48c00,0x6) 3347 make GIO fd 2 wrote 6 bytes "gencat" Obviously its not in any of those places. How can I fix this? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 01:00:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A1A6D9 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 01:00:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7698157 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 01:00:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.10.3] ([173.88.197.103]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:59:58 -0800 Message-ID: <50E77B0C.7000808@a1poweruser.com> Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 19:59:56 -0500 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Altman Subject: Re: freebsd-update: fale? References: <20130102002110.GA7209@whisperer.chthonixia.net> <50E59AC4.5020203@martinlaabs.de> <20130104223248.GA63681@whisperer.chthonixia.net> In-Reply-To: <20130104223248.GA63681@whisperer.chthonixia.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jan 2013 00:59:58.0775 (UTC) FILETIME=[FBDC7C70:01CDEADF] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Authenticated-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-EchoSenderHash: [fbsd8]-[a1poweruser*com] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 01:00:03 -0000 Joe Altman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 03:50:44PM +0100, Martin Laabs wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 01/02/13 01:21, Joe Altman wrote: >>> Greetings, list. I have the following error; though I can load >>> update5.FreeBSD.org in a browser: >>> [...] >> maybe you use a release that is not supported by freebsd-update. Run >> "uname -r" an compare the release with that you see when looking at >> http://update4.freebsd.org/ >> >> If it is not there you can not use freebsd-update. > > Yes; I realized that after I revisited the man page and handbook; > somehow I managed to miss that initially. I'm currently using > 9.1-PRERELEASE. > > > Now I am left to wonder how that state will last; ISTM that eventually > 9.1 will be supported by freebsd-update but I cannot tell when that > might happen. Given that CVSUP is going away soon, I can't see > reinstalling it just for this unnecessary upgrade. > > Since I appear to be stuck between things, I have three questions: > > 1) Is there any way to guesstimate how long until 9.1 is supported by > freebsd-update? > > 2) Am I correct in assuming that there is no good reason (security > concerns, for instance) to update right now? I seem to have no > problems with my system; it runs fine. > > 3) Does freebsd-update really require at least a Gig of space in /var > for a major or minor upgrade? If so, it looks like I may as well > reinstall the OS, since I never anticipated needing that much in > /var. At this point, given the amount of 'portupgrade -fr' I'll need > to do, it might consume less time to start from scratch. > > > Thanks for the followup, and best regards, > > Joe Heres a work around that should work. For your 9.1-PRERELEASE you can temporary change that so freebsd-update will work for you. Issue this console command on your system. setenv UNAME_r "9.0-RELEASE" Now when you run freebsd-update it will think your system is 9.0-RELEASE and go through with the update to 9.1-RELEASE. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 02:40:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD64E3BF for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 02:40:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3A23CF for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 02:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TrJgf-0005CX-5u for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 03:40:41 +0100 Received: from p5dcd75d1.dip.t-dialin.net ([93.205.117.209]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 03:40:41 +0100 Received: from jumper99 by p5dcd75d1.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 03:40:41 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Helmut Schneider" Subject: Re: Trying to update from 9.0 to 9.1 via svn Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 02:40:13 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5dcd75d1.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: XanaNews/1.19.1.194 X-Ref: news.gmane.org ~XNS:00000031 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130104-1, 04.01.2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 02:40:28 -0000 Trond Endrestøl wrote: > BTW, do you nuke the contents of /usr/obj prior to recompiling the > system? The command rm -Rf /usr/obj/* should accomplish this rather > well. That might have been the issue, yes. Works now. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 04:00:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19781BB for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 04:00:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6818983A for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 04:00:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=7oKEodhOvxJaponj4l3m2J45gB7k3drZUdL8/jm/Sm4=; b=skqv3d++5C2ZPChKVNTxBo3Pz1zqWJw4tU3dqDjSQodLd5vo+HdKVMZoLKZWHBd5WStMWekgIySg6NId1RHYbqA7/n8hP57uMredmifEZhH+zJGql8QfRbP1LwiuD7Zs; Received: from [122.129.203.50] (port=26022 helo=X220.ovitrap.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1TrKvP-0008gS-FQ; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 21:00:00 -0700 Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 10:59:56 +0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: "Helmut Schneider" Subject: Re: Trying to update from 9.0 to 9.1 via svn Message-ID: <20130105105956.490d2adb@X220.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 04:00:06 -0000 Hi, On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 02:40:13 +0000 (UTC) "Helmut Schneider" wrote: > Trond Endrest=C3=B8l wrote: >=20 > > BTW, do you nuke the contents of /usr/obj prior to recompiling the=20 > > system? The command rm -Rf /usr/obj/* should accomplish this rather=20 > > well. >=20 > That might have been the issue, yes. Works now. Thanks. doesn't this indicate an error in the make file? Shouldn't sources be compiled when their date is newer then the date of the object file?=20 Or was the last compilation done after the affected file got updated at the server? Shouldn't there be a system in place which automatically deletes all object files automatically? Either a process is automated 100% or not at all is what I would say. Erich >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 07:43:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B427437C for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 07:43:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757F9D80 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 07:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2565824F76; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:43:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r057hIWE001891; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:43:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:43:18 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Gary Kline Subject: Re: somewhat OT ... in parts Message-Id: <20130105084318.61354422.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20130104215945.GA23933@ethic.thought.org> References: <20130103025305.GA24960@ethic.thought.org> <20130103072741.c02a1150.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130104022738.GA7368@ethic.thought.org> <20130104080339.13b51546.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130104215945.GA23933@ethic.thought.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 07:43:23 -0000 On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 13:59:45 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 08:03:39AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:27:38 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > > > one question I have may solve the problem of vim displaying > > > all the ^/search terms and displaying them in some color. > > > the default brown is awful, but dark blue isn't much bbetter. > > > > If you try :colorscheme blue you can see that the results have > > orange background with dark text (maybe black?), while the editor > > background is blue (as the name of the color scheme suggests). > > > > > > > > > So: can I add something to my ~/.vimrc that =limits= > > > the "search" to displaying one term? if I am searching for, > > > say, "the" or I guess /\, I dont want every "the" in my > > > file. I want only one. or one at a time, and not necessarily > > > in color. > > > > If you have :set hlsearch activated, all (visible) matches will > > be highlighted, and the cursor will be placed at the first match. > > > > I don't see an option to highlight the _next_ result only. However, > > if you do _not_ set hlsearch, searching and continuing searching > > will not highlight anything, instead let the cursor skip to the > > next match (tried here with "gvim /COPYRIGHT", /this, /, /, / and > > so on), with :set nohlsearch for testing. > > > > Hm. there must be "something" in Muttrc. I dont see it in my > local ~/.muttrc; this "something" is controlling every /search > term and highlighting it. That should be the default of :set hls (usually in ~/.vimrc), as I assume Mutt "inlines" vim. > the regular vim /tmp/foofile.c /tmp/footext is fine. it's only > in mutt that highlights EVERY instance that I'm searching for. > I'll figure it out eventually if you don't know offhand. or > anybody else. Search for "flags to vim as editor", :set hlsearch or :set hls. You can add your own :set nohlsearch or :set nohls at the end of the file to try to deactivate the effect. This should also work when manually entered during an editor session. > maybe I should just find keith bostic's newvi; see if they have it > for linux; theyve got everything else... {grumble} I know there's nvi in ports. Maybe those will be helpful: http://garage.linux.student.kuleuven.be/~skimo//nvi/ nvi download here: https://sites.google.com/a/bostic.com/keithbostic/files Project page and FAQ: https://sites.google.com/a/bostic.com/keithbostic/vi -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 07:44:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2160941F for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 07:44:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jack.mclauren@yahoo.com) Received: from nm4-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm4-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.213.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91036D96 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 07:43:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.212.144] by nm4.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jan 2013 07:43:57 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.220] by tm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jan 2013 07:43:57 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1029.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jan 2013 07:43:57 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 874272.4919.bm@omp1029.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 21004 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jan 2013 07:43:57 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1357371837; bh=ubq9wWJGnSIvHgfxSg6U9lqXLy5NQ1WuMH+XwGfnCyw=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=0FkSP07NqwnnifRn2Wa9wn3EqmTQ1MCQaPMkMseW1tjNs5VhggEBK+7Jh7fx9/Vre/4oq6BW1toZfg3PagmEsmSPSCAV1vnitqyfvBJySllk6uu7Aud0TF+Z9x1uShIVvMUVESe7tG7JqqRL0yVIZjHPcUwHRqO0BSy91hnAGVs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AoR+6eTml4HolnaepblpNN8hPjVGkIoEdqKceAF7ZKZSQ78emMRtD/vCrpLzYBZfITavpEDIzUG8nPIjmNMPY5bf9y3W7FGUQqZ1m1tbYf03sVEEbKCCssLpxs/reG47tKVD9S4+8O43mLMN2wayQDVHA5J3mf7GF44fZ7JyIXs=; X-YMail-OSG: s9goW8QVM1n4XIzE62H1Z8V2Et7BfRwORS8LeSVNMwljuqu GTl90RGMAEETplUj4nheIsmQLAlP.pZN1huipExpVKmY2NL6Zfc89mwPcu_. 9.bOxX79vc_H30_NaWqaWEdcJb3zRRISCUgo.Sk646xQ9xnk0HhTPPaKga9a lltdm0JDbF3U0SeVs_BYiCbnI.RMVioje3iWrP1bGNqGpg.BvuWBHBKD5S70 mUG6q10RzHQM7Azhnys3ACP3U4yRkr1PjLAX_Czml_ZIGAHjXsoy28CdkB96 bDLV3GWD0NsrZSrGWK1ilBIOxXrl2JME5BIlUcLGBehinxvJEp3R0f4fokHE ULidbITjt37Xx83muapnxKzLKRadcQSqM28BZI3EcCQvpshLENsQxmRi6Zx7 VptETYFd4aq4c6twWgLv0ZhFGgy4iWAEi80umJy9kl8FfyjyI Received: from [89.165.120.140] by web160101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 23:43:57 PST X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001, SGkKCkhvdyBjYW4gSSByZXN0YXJ0IG15IGZyZWVCU0QgYWZ0ZXIgc3BlY2lmaWMgc2Vjb25kcyA_CgpUaGFua3MgaW4gYWR2YW5jZSAuLi4BMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.129.483 Message-ID: <1357371837.19307.YahooMailNeo@web160101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 23:43:57 -0800 (PST) From: Jack Mc Lauren Subject: system restart after some seconds To: FreeBSD Global Users Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jack Mc Lauren List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 07:44:00 -0000 Hi How can I restart my freeBSD after specific seconds ? Thanks in advance ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 07:51:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B522586; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 07:51:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62114DF2; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 07:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF47A24CA3; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:51:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r057pGxN001919; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:51:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:51:16 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Gary Kline Subject: Re: somewhat OT ... in parts Message-Id: <20130105085116.339e91b4.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20130104222939.GB23933@ethic.thought.org> References: <20130103025305.GA24960@ethic.thought.org> <20130103072741.c02a1150.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130104022738.GA7368@ethic.thought.org> <20130104080339.13b51546.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130104222939.GB23933@ethic.thought.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Devin Teske , FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 07:51:15 -0000 On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 14:29:39 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 06:09:53AM -0800, Devin Teske wrote: > > > > On Jan 3, 2013, at 11:03 PM, Polytropon wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:27:38 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > > >> one question I have may solve the problem of vim displaying > > >> all the ^/search terms and displaying them in some color. > > >> the default brown is awful, but dark blue isn't much bbetter. > > > > > > If you try :colorscheme blue you can see that the results have > > > orange background with dark text (maybe black?), while the editor > > > background is blue (as the name of the color scheme suggests). > > > > > > > > > > > >> So: can I add something to my ~/.vimrc that =limits= > > >> the "search" to displaying one term? if I am searching for, > > >> say, "the" or I guess /\, I dont want every "the" in my > > >> file. I want only one. or one at a time, and not necessarily > > >> in color. > > > > > > If you have :set hlsearch activated, all (visible) matches will > > > be highlighted, > > > > :set hls > > :set nohls > > > > for short to enable/disable (respectively). > > > > > > > and the cursor will be placed at the first match. > > > > > > > > YES! well, at least it works when I reply in mutt --which ive got > set to use vim. the "set" strings immediately vanished from deep > blue ... in other words, I can read the reply much more easily. > > I put the > > ":set nohls" > > in my ~/.muttrc and got an error when I exec'd mutt. I'll try > without the colon. Yes, that's the correct syntax (like for .vimrc). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 07:56:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D273827 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 07:56:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@passap.ru) Received: from forward12.mail.yandex.net (forward12.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4890E21 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 07:56:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (smtp12.mail.yandex.net [95.108.131.191]) by forward12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 20656C20E3B; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 11:56:18 +0400 (MSK) Received: from smtp12.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id AE9A316A0319; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 11:56:18 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 93.91.2.63.tel.ru (93.91.2.63.tel.ru [93.91.2.63]) by smtp12.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id uI7uGwSo-uI7uvfOK; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 11:56:18 +0400 Message-ID: <50E7DCA2.1020907@passap.ru> Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 11:56:18 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov Organization: =?UTF-8?B?0JfQkNCeICLQktCQ0KDQoiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jack Mc Lauren Subject: Re: system restart after some seconds References: <1357371837.19307.YahooMailNeo@web160101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1357371837.19307.YahooMailNeo@web160101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Global Users Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 07:56:21 -0000 05.01.2013 11:43, Jack Mc Lauren пишет: > How can I restart my freeBSD after specific seconds ? SHUTDOWN(8): ----- NAME shutdown, poweroff — close down the system at a given time SYNOPSIS shutdown [-] [-h | -p | -r | -k] [-o [-n]] time [warning-message ...] poweroff [...] -r The system is rebooted at the specified time. ----- -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 07:58:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FDA8EA for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 07:58:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25EEE3E for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 07:58:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C68254AE; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:58:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r057wgcb001980; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:58:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:58:42 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Jack Mc Lauren Subject: Re: system restart after some seconds Message-Id: <20130105085842.c5d70579.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <1357371837.19307.YahooMailNeo@web160101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <1357371837.19307.YahooMailNeo@web160101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Global Users Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 07:58:41 -0000 On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 23:43:57 -0800 (PST), Jack Mc Lauren wrote: > How can I restart my freeBSD after specific seconds ? Unelegant and obvious: # sleep 10 ; shutdown -r now If you need this to happen automatically, use /etc/rc.local, and maybe put the whole command into background using (...)&. Beware - endless loop! You need to be fast enough to revert the change or go to SUM to do so. :-) Parameters to shutdown itself, as well as for the "at" command, only allow minutes as most precise elements; see "man shutdown" and "man at" for details. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 08:02:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E109FA for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@passap.ru) Received: from forward2h.mail.yandex.net (forward2h.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:f05::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2747E6D for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4h.mail.yandex.net (smtp4h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.186.21]) by forward2h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id A3280700FFE; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 12:02:27 +0400 (MSK) Received: from smtp4h.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 53E222C040A; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 12:02:27 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 93.91.2.63.tel.ru (93.91.2.63.tel.ru [93.91.2.63]) by smtp4h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id 2QoqtK2H-2RoGtWpq; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 12:02:27 +0400 Message-ID: <50E7DE12.6010502@passap.ru> Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 12:02:26 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov Organization: =?UTF-8?B?0JfQkNCeICLQktCQ0KDQoiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jack Mc Lauren Subject: Re: system restart after some seconds References: <1357371837.19307.YahooMailNeo@web160101.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <50E7DCA2.1020907@passap.ru> In-Reply-To: <50E7DCA2.1020907@passap.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Global Users Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 08:02:29 -0000 05.01.2013 11:56, Boris Samorodov пишет: > 05.01.2013 11:43, Jack Mc Lauren пишет: > >> How can I restart my freeBSD after specific seconds ? > > SHUTDOWN(8): > ----- > NAME > shutdown, poweroff — close down the system at a given time > > SYNOPSIS > shutdown [-] [-h | -p | -r | -k] [-o [-n]] time [warning-message ...] > poweroff > [...] > -r The system is rebooted at the specified time. > ----- Yep, Polytropon is right. Here "time" is minutes. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 10:41:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BDA4E19 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 10:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC0F8C9 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 10:40:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1F924A6F; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 11:40:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r05Aewct002415; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 11:40:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 11:40:58 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Leslie Jensen Subject: Re: Which k3b is recommended? Message-Id: <20130105114058.0cd98328.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <50E54666.4060407@eskk.nu> References: <50E54666.4060407@eskk.nu> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 10:41:00 -0000 On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:50:46 +0100, Leslie Jensen wrote: > > I need k3b on a newly installed 9.1-RELEASE system. > > I wonder if I miss out on some functionality if I go with version > without KDE? > > I use XFCE4 as my Desktop. Maybe not directly related, but I'm using k9copy without a full KDE installation, with WindowMaker as my window manager (no desktop at all). I'm not missing any essential functionality for this program. So probably using k3b should work just fine. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 12:12:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02B6CE4 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 12:12:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (mail.sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C89B52 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 12:12:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.97.5 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPSA id 30159953 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:12:42 +0700 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r05BCfUF034197 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 18:12:42 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r05BCeMi034196 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 18:12:40 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 18:12:40 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: last(1) does not work after upgrade to 9.1-STABLE Message-ID: <20130105111240.GA34092@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 12:12:52 -0000 Colleagues, I have upgraded from 9.0-STABLE to 9.1-STABLE (via make world) and have found out that last(1) does not work any more. From the output of "strings /var/log/utx.log" I guess that the information about recent logins, users, hosts etc is there, but somehow "last" does not show it. The last entries it shows are from the moment before installworld. [sudakov@vas ~] last | head -n3 sudakov pts/4 :0 ÓÒ 2 ÑÎ× 13:32 still logged in sudakov pts/5 :0 ÓÒ 2 ÑÎ× 13:01 - 13:01 (00:00) sudakov pts/4 :0 ÓÒ 2 ÑÎ× 13:01 - 13:19 (00:18) [sudakov@vas ~] What can it mean? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 13:24:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1759EDF8 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 13:24:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCC3DE2 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 13:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mbook.home (pool-173-79-208-244.washdc.fios.verizon.net [173.79.208.244]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r05DOXhU083883 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 05:24:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Subject: SOLVED: Problem upgrading to 9.1-Release From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: <299E9D35-959E-4074-BEC8-7B335C177F7A@lafn.org> Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 05:24:28 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <299E9D35-959E-4074-BEC8-7B335C177F7A@lafn.org> To: FreeBSD Mailing List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 13:24:37 -0000 I found the problem. Somehow /usr/obj was not successfully exported and = hence was completely empty. There must have been some error message in = that process that I missed. Anyway, correcting that problem so that = /usr/obj was available fixed the problem. On 4 January 2013, at 15:38, Doug Hardie wrote: > I have upgraded my development system to 9.1 without any problems. = This system maintains kernel source and I build a new kernel with a = couple extra options there. The other systems mount /usr/src and = /usr/obj from it and do the install. The first one to be upgraded had = no problem with make installkernel. Rebooted and ran mergemaster -p = just fine. However make installworld dies within a couple seconds with = the following error: >=20 > install -o root -g wheel -m 444 libc_pic.a /usr/lib > gencat be_BY.UTF-8.cat /usr/src/lib/libc/nls/be_BY.UTF-8.msg > gencat: No such file or directory > *** [be_BY.UTF-8.cat] Error code 1 >=20 > /usr/bin/gencat exists. However, ktrace of the make shows: >=20 > 3347 make CALL execve(0xbfbfd1c8,0x28c35f14,0x28421180) > 3347 make NAMI "/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin/gencat" > 3347 make RET execve -1 errno 2 No such file or directory > 3347 make CALL execve(0xbfbfd1c8,0x28c35f14,0x28421180) > 3347 make NAMI "/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin/gencat" > 3347 make RET execve -1 errno 2 No such file or directory > 3347 make CALL execve(0xbfbfd1c8,0x28c35f14,0x28421180) > 3347 make NAMI "/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/games/gencat" > 3347 make RET execve -1 errno 2 No such file or directory > 3347 make CALL execve(0xbfbfd1c8,0x28c35f14,0x28421180) > 3347 make NAMI "/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/sbin/gencat" > 3347 make RET execve -1 errno 2 No such file or directory > 3347 make CALL execve(0xbfbfd1c8,0x28c35f14,0x28421180) > 3347 make NAMI "/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/gencat" > 3347 make RET execve -1 errno 2 No such file or directory > 3347 make CALL execve(0xbfbfd1c8,0x28c35f14,0x28421180) > 3347 make NAMI "/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/games/gencat" > 3347 make RET execve -1 errno 2 No such file or directory > 3347 make CALL execve(0xbfbfd1c8,0x28c35f14,0x28421180) > 3347 make NAMI "/tmp/install.CuIzLuBX/gencat" > 3347 make RET execve -1 errno 2 No such file or directory > 3347 make CALL write(0x2,0x28c48c00,0x6) > 3347 make GIO fd 2 wrote 6 bytes > "gencat" >=20 > Obviously its not in any of those places. How can I fix this? >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 13:24:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497F5E8B for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 13:24:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EDCDE9 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 13:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r05DOiJu081524 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 5 Jan 2013 14:24:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id r05DOhnv081521; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 14:24:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 14:24:43 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Erich Dollansky Subject: Re: Trying to update from 9.0 to 9.1 via svn In-Reply-To: <20130105105956.490d2adb@X220.ovitrap.com> Message-ID: References: <20130105105956.490d2adb@X220.ovitrap.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="2055831798-884942623-1357392284=:41917" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.fig.ol.no Cc: Helmut Schneider , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 13:24:55 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --2055831798-884942623-1357392284=:41917 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 10:59+0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 02:40:13 +0000 (UTC) > "Helmut Schneider" wrote: > > > Trond Endrestøl wrote: > > > > > BTW, do you nuke the contents of /usr/obj prior to recompiling the > > > system? The command rm -Rf /usr/obj/* should accomplish this rather > > > well. > > > > That might have been the issue, yes. Works now. Thanks. > > doesn't this indicate an error in the make file? > > Shouldn't sources be compiled when their date is newer then the date of > the object file? That assumes a lot of things, like the clock is running correctly at all times, e.g. under the control of NTP or some other mechanism. If said computer dual boots Microsoft OS, then most likely the firmware clock (BIOS clock, RTC) runs in local time. Should you then boot FreeBSD straight into single user mode with /etc/wall_cmos_clock present, and you fail to run adjkerntz -i while in single user mode, then the clock will be off by 1 or 2 hours, depending on daylight saving time is in effect or not. Next, svn sets the date and time on each checked out file to the present date and time. If the clock is running in the future at the time of check out/update a lot of things might happen at the time of compilation of the source code. Of course, I'm just speculating, the one who knows most about the issue at hand is Helmut. > Or was the last compilation done after the affected file got updated at > the server? > > Shouldn't there be a system in place which automatically deletes all > object files automatically? make buildworld does include a step where certain files are wiped. It still doesn't hurt to take matters in your own hands. > Either a process is automated 100% or not at all is what I would say. Outer forces may be at play as outlined above. Anyway, this is all part of learning to cope with changes, mistakes, wrong assumptions, etc. > Erich -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ --2055831798-884942623-1357392284=:41917-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 16:15:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A7ABE30 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 16:15:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from clangbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-f51.google.com (mail-la0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694C12C9 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 16:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f51.google.com with SMTP id fj20so11740548lab.38 for ; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 08:15:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lKAjS/1aiEf91nmSQpSQNqTQiOpqKftMK1VBvcJjCnQ=; b=t9SH8Bv1Et7ajcw7aIqMWTftCtyX0HDvAmIj3YJVXmrMSjkNbF3NZ2nl/j7TRkGvkE s2PSdXowzlJPaygkmlcXVQ56cL86FtmW9fUZOraHTF5jw5xRG1CRG+E1dJ01oW3e0CqM ZnZ7abuHPXNNYXnnBk2PyFvdwW/29R4VT1uuIDQGJWqk0GmI54Wq5I/F20KsbqHqgjii T8MEQHS+U65B1LB4xPbUQHAUzV4cNVfQX0lKLVJ658h7DYmB/m+PiM2LVFRMS7Rydd3v M0wUyYZvwyLidysLFzU8pBp/qoTua4P9YRLJwvhYXY1T+hVXIQUWk63O2nFrDjkJOzWz TuYQ== X-Received: by 10.152.144.71 with SMTP id sk7mr53095143lab.29.1357402505256; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 08:15:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (host-2-60-43-44.pppoe.omsknet.ru. [2.60.43.44]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id if8sm20574034lab.1.2013.01.05.08.15.03 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 05 Jan 2013 08:15:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50E8518A.6070408@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 23:15:06 +0700 From: Dima Naumov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Reduce the consumption of video memory Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 16:15:13 -0000 Can i reduce using of video memory in xorg.conf? My video card is almost dead, i think is something with Video Memory, because in monitor showed and disappear little noisy pixel, and i wish check out is problem with video memory? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 16:38:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DC284D for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 16:38:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5284E369 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 16:38:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-31-80.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.31.80]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA063CAE1; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 17:38:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r05GcaZM004151; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 17:38:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 17:38:36 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Dima Naumov Subject: Re: Reduce the consumption of video memory Message-Id: <20130105173836.d6b258b0.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <50E8518A.6070408@gmail.com> References: <50E8518A.6070408@gmail.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 16:38:40 -0000 On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 23:15:06 +0700, Dima Naumov wrote: > Can i reduce using of video memory in xorg.conf? My video card is almost > dead, i think is something with Video Memory, because in monitor showed > and disappear little noisy pixel, and i wish check out is problem with > video memory? You can add an entry into the GPU's "Device" section. How _exactly_ this option will be honored depends on the actual driver you're using. >From "man xorg.conf": VideoRam mem This optional entry specifies the amount of video ram that is installed on the graphics board. This is measured in kBytes. In most cases this is not required because the Xorg server probes the graphics board to determine this quantity. The driver-specific documentation should indicate when it might be needed. Check the documentation for your driver if it will deal with this setting in the desired way. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 16:40:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E7F8ED for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 16:40:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6DA37C for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 16:40:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TrWnS-0003BQ-8e for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:40:34 +0100 Received: from 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:40:34 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:40:34 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jb Subject: Re: Reduce the consumption of video memory Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 16:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <50E8518A.6070408@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121121 Firefox/10.0.11) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 16:40:23 -0000 Dima Naumov gmail.com> writes: > > Can i reduce using of video memory in xorg.conf? My video card is almost > dead, i think is something with Video Memory, because in monitor showed > and disappear little noisy pixel, and i wish check out is problem with > video memory? - check in BIOS - man xorg.conf VideoRam jb From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 17:07:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB74C40 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 17:07:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) Received: from redcondor2.peak.org (redcondor2.peak.org [69.59.192.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EDC0684 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 17:07:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmail-mta01.peak.org ([207.55.16.111]) by redcondor2.peak.org ({6c724cae-de34-4c5f-b615-3072b86419fa}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTP id 20130105170421106 for ; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:04:21 +0000 X-RC-FROM: X-RC-RCPT: Received: from birch.localnet (rad0.peak.org [69.59.192.40]) by zmail-mta01.peak.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CAE2C491967 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 09:04:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from oak.localnet (oak.localnet [192.168.193.34]) by birch.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3874556E8 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 09:04:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from oak.localnet (localhost.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by oak.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2519ABE26 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:58:59 -0800 (PST) Received: (from carlj@localhost) by oak.localnet (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id r05GwwRe017433; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:58:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) X-Authentication-Warning: oak.localnet: carlj set sender to carlj@peak.org using -f From: Carl Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: somewhat OT ... in parts References: <20130103025305.GA24960@ethic.thought.org> <20130103072741.c02a1150.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130104022738.GA7368@ethic.thought.org> <20130104080339.13b51546.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130104215945.GA23933@ethic.thought.org> <20130105084318.61354422.freebsd@edvax.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 08:58:58 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20130105084318.61354422.freebsd@edvax.de> (Polytropon's message of "Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:43:18 +0100") Message-ID: <87y5g7o9bh.fsf@oak.localnet> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-MAG-OUTBOUND: peakinternet.redcondor.net@207.55.16/22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:07:56 -0000 Polytropon writes: > On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 13:59:45 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: >> maybe I should just find keith bostic's newvi; see if they have it >> for linux; theyve got everything else... {grumble} > > I know there's nvi in ports. > > Maybe those will be helpful: > > http://garage.linux.student.kuleuven.be/~skimo//nvi/ > > > > nvi download here: > > https://sites.google.com/a/bostic.com/keithbostic/files > > > > Project page and FAQ: > > https://sites.google.com/a/bostic.com/keithbostic/vi The vi in FreeBSD is already nvi. The name nvi is a link to vi in /usr/bin and the source includes nvi at /usr/src/contrib/nvi/. -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 18:22:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41BA514 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 18:22:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schultz@ime.usp.br) Received: from netuno.ime.usp.br (netuno.ime.usp.br [143.107.45.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87169B21 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 18:22:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arachne.ime.usp.br (arachne.ime.usp.br [143.107.45.22]) by netuno.ime.usp.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42532AC03C0 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 16:12:57 -0200 (BRST) Received: by arachne.ime.usp.br (Postfix, from userid 112) id 296DA360CB6; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 16:12:56 -0200 (BRST) Received: from bd65dbab.virtua.com.br (bd65dbab.virtua.com.br [189.101.219.171]) by webmail.ime.usp.br (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 16:12:56 -0200 Message-ID: <20130105161256.49797e7viwwtqfc8@webmail.ime.usp.br> Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 16:12:56 -0200 From: schultz@ime.usp.br To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Backup with mtree and rsync? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.10) X-Horde-Username: schultz X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_MID, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on netuno.ime.usp.br X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:22:45 -0000 I have been wondering whether it is possible to create a backup system using mtree and rsync. Essentially, the user would create a mtree specification of the source directory and copy it over to the destination directory with rsync. Any changes in the destination could then be detected before restoring with the mtree specification, which should contain strong hashes of the files and should not contain the nlink keyword. The problem is that mtree would be too slow. It would recompute the hashes of big files even when they did not change from the last backup. Therefore, I would like to ask if there is an easy way to accomplish the following. Let a mtree specification of a directory from a certain point in the past be given. Also, assume that a (regular) file below that directory has not changed if its current modification time (mtime) equals its modification time in the past specification. Produce as output the new mtree specification for the directory without reading these files. This is somewhat like rsync does to perform incremental backups. P.S.: As an aside, is there an utility in the base system that can reproduce the behavior of `rsync --delete -a dir0/ dir1/`? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 18:25:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0CD5DB for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 18:25:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3106FB48 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 18:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gamma.lan.locolomo.org (gamma.lan.locolomo.org [192.168.0.40]) by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 150CF1C0841 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 19:17:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50E86E42.1010300@locolomo.org> Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 19:17:38 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Problem compling apr1 from ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:25:54 -0000 Hi, I just rebuilt my system to FBSD91 and updated the ports tree. Now builidng apache which depends on apr1 I but fails building because of dependency on python. Python is installed, and is found initially. Full error: root@alpha:/usr/local/ports/devel/apr1 # make ===> portaudit database exists, however, portaudit is not installed! ===> Found saved configuration for apr-1.4.6.1.4.1_3 ===> Extracting for apr-1.4.6.1.4.1_3 => SHA256 Checksum OK for apr-1.4.6.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for apr-util-1.4.1.tar.gz. ===> Patching for apr-1.4.6.1.4.1_3 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for apr-1.4.6.1.4.1_3 /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's/OSVERSION/901000/g' /usr/local/ports/devel/apr1/work/apr-1.4.6/build/apr_hints.m4 /usr/bin/find /usr/local/ports/devel/apr1/work/apr-1.4.6 /usr/local/ports/devel/apr1/work/apr-util-1.4.1 -name "Makefile.in*" | /usr/bin/xargs /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|[(]libdir[)]/pkgconfig|(prefix)/libdata/pkgconfig|g' /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's,-lpthread,-pthread,g' /usr/local/ports/devel/apr1/work/apr-1.4.6/build/apr_threads.m4 /usr/local/ports/devel/apr1/work/apr-1.4.6/build/apr_hints.m4 /usr/local/ports/devel/apr1/work/apr-util-1.4.1/build/apu-conf.m4 /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e '1 s/python/python2.6/' /usr/local/ports/devel/apr1/work/apr-1.4.6/build/gen-build.py /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's/void main/int main/' /usr/local/ports/devel/apr1/work/apr-1.4.6/build/apr_network.m4 /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|sql = apr_palloc|sql = apr_pcalloc|' /usr/local/ports/devel/apr1/work/apr-util-1.4.1/dbd/apr_dbd_freetds.c ===> apr-1.4.6.1.4.1_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.6 - found ===> apr-1.4.6.1.4.1_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/automake-1.12 - found ===> apr-1.4.6.1.4.1_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf-2.69 - found ===> apr-1.4.6.1.4.1_3 depends on package: libtool>=2.4 - found ===> apr-1.4.6.1.4.1_3 depends on shared library: expat - found ===> apr-1.4.6.1.4.1_3 depends on shared library: gdbm - found ===> apr-1.4.6.1.4.1_3 depends on shared library: iconv.3 - found ===> apr-1.4.6.1.4.1_3 depends on shared library: pq.5 - found ===> apr-1.4.6.1.4.1_3 depends on shared library: db-4.6.0 - found ===> apr-1.4.6.1.4.1_3 depends on shared library: sqlite3.8 - found ===> Configuring for apr-1.4.6.1.4.1_3 cd /usr/local/ports/devel/apr1/work/apr-1.4.6 ; /usr/bin/env CC="cc" ac_cv_path_PGSQL_CONFIG="" PYTHON="/usr/local/bin/python2.6" SHELL=/bin/sh CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/sh AUTOMAKE=/usr/local/bin/automake-1.12 AUTOMAKE_DIR=/usr/local/share/automake-1.12 AUTOMAKE_VERSION=1.12 AUTOMAKE_APIVER=1.12.6 ACLOCAL=/usr/local/bin/aclocal-1.12 ACLOCAL_DIR=/usr/local/share/aclocal-1.12 AUTOCONF=/usr/local/bin/autoconf-2.69 AUTOCONF_DIR=/usr/local/share/autoconf-2.69 AUTOHEADER=/usr/local/bin/autoheader-2.69 AUTOIFNAMES=/usr/local/bin/ifnames-2.69 AUTOM4TE=/usr/local/bin/autom4te-2.69 AUTORECONF=/usr/local/bin/autoreconf-2.69 AUTOSCAN=/usr/local/bin/autoscan-2.69 AUTOUPDATE=/usr/local/bin/autoupdate-2.69 AUTOCONF_VERSION=2.69 LIBTOOL=/usr/local/bin/libtool LIBTOOLIZE=/usr/local/bin/libtoolize LIBTOOL_LIBEXECDIR=/usr/local/libexec/libtool LIBTOOL_SHAREDIR=/usr/local/share/libtool LIBTOOL_M4=/usr/local/share/aclocal/libtool.m4 LTMAIN=/usr/local/share/libtool/config/ltmain.sh lt_cv_sys_max_cmd_len=262144 /bin/sh ./buildconf buildconf: checking installation... buildconf: python not found. You need python installed to build APR from SVN. *** [run-autotools] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/local/ports/devel/apr1. *** [build] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/local/ports/devel/apr1. Any clues? Thanks, Erik -- M: +34 666 334 818 T: +34 915 211 157 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 21:53:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D3F642 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 21:53:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from p3plsmtpa06-02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa06-02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.192.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9017D5 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 21:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ethic.thought.org ([209.180.213.209]) by p3plsmtpa06-02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with id kMtU1k0044XeM0101MtUMJ; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 14:53:29 -0700 Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 13:53:35 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: Polytropon Subject: Re: somewhat OT ... in parts Message-ID: <20130105215335.GA5722@ethic.thought.org> References: <20130103025305.GA24960@ethic.thought.org> <20130103072741.c02a1150.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130104022738.GA7368@ethic.thought.org> <20130104080339.13b51546.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130104215945.GA23933@ethic.thought.org> <20130105084318.61354422.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130105084318.61354422.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:53:36 -0000 On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 08:43:18AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: > On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 13:59:45 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 08:03:39AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:27:38 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > > > > one question I have may solve the problem of vim displaying > > > > all the ^/search terms and displaying them in some color. > > > > the default brown is awful, but dark blue isn't much bbetter. > > > > > > If you try :colorscheme blue you can see that the results have > > > orange background with dark text (maybe black?), while the editor > > > background is blue (as the name of the color scheme suggests). > > > > > > > > > > > > > So: can I add something to my ~/.vimrc that =limits= > > > > the "search" to displaying one term? if I am searching for, > > > > say, "the" or I guess /\, I dont want every "the" in my > > > > file. I want only one. or one at a time, and not necessarily > > > > in color. > > > > > > If you have :set hlsearch activated, all (visible) matches will > > > be highlighted, and the cursor will be placed at the first match. > > > > > > I don't see an option to highlight the _next_ result only. However, > > > if you do _not_ set hlsearch, searching and continuing searching > > > will not highlight anything, instead let the cursor skip to the > > > next match (tried here with "gvim /COPYRIGHT", /this, /, /, / and > > > so on), with :set nohlsearch for testing. > > > > > > > Hm. there must be "something" in Muttrc. I dont see it in my > > local ~/.muttrc; this "something" is controlling every /search > > term and highlighting it. > > That should be the default of :set hls (usually in ~/.vimrc), > as I assume Mutt "inlines" vim. > > > > > the regular vim /tmp/foofile.c /tmp/footext is fine. it's only > > in mutt that highlights EVERY instance that I'm searching for. > > I'll figure it out eventually if you don't know offhand. or > > anybody else. > > Search for "flags to vim as editor", :set hlsearch or :set hls. > You can add your own :set nohlsearch or :set nohls at the end > of the file to try to deactivate the effect. This should also > work when manually entered during an editor session. > > > > > maybe I should just find keith bostic's newvi; see if they have it > > for linux; theyve got everything else... {grumble} > > I know there's nvi in ports. > > Maybe those will be helpful: > > http://garage.linux.student.kuleuven.be/~skimo//nvi/ > > > > nvi download here: > > https://sites.google.com/a/bostic.com/keithbostic/files > > > > Project page and FAQ: > > https://sites.google.com/a/bostic.com/keithbostic/vi > > > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... super! dank! I had no idea that keith's stuff was still around--well, except for our nvi in ports/editors/. one quick and easy solution would be to set editor = nvi in my .muttrc and see if that works. sometimes colors are helpful; usually I can get along fine w/out :-) -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Twenty-six years of service to the Unix community.