From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 29 06:38:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157F2419 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 06:38:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talayeh.asadi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB3FE2836 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 06:38:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id x13so7725721ief.29 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 23:38:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=+oSYQYqzspHrkZIYAGGRNZCdvIF9EjlpiC63pL9e/xY=; b=jvYnh3WrDJ2BiiDpCc8rffF6uKNnvvwU643LxhLSLXZjBBUWO/TgRpU32PZYbJYbxA sARhP1gIWjs1vkCn1G5b63eILoNUjPMCeX+bcs5tGvCb1zy7qNdWVxvD6wgH+LD00iRC 442TkWBYGv1DKsrC5RT9U+AGGyvYkMAaw/4a4z1Ah5p7Cpn09WUA2OwnssJ1kDz3qOgn pLFRcFLRkFkMdYJqGqKYsWrO57WcmYV/sIhuFmCmFhcPXctTUpAPkCS5PJ6vF1uf+T9w wS2NIuW1C2KvlAkf9wFZEzFPgOsG5hYymjf4l1Dht0ta6CXwkB8Isan5q3O9Kjfa0NlW TsYQ== X-Received: by 10.50.97.35 with SMTP id dx3mr8955796igb.55.1380436738262; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 23:38:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: talayeh.asadi@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.153.8 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 23:38:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: takCoder Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:08:38 +0330 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3pccyW_jEQObBAgeI8ynGXXevdA Message-ID: Subject: Re: Throughput test with iperf... To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: tak.official@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 06:38:59 -0000 hi again.. would any of you please at least explain it to me what may cause iperf server ending up with "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" message right at the beginning of setting second connection in my bi-directional throughput test, using -r flag?? i used these commands on client and server on two freebsd machines which are connected straight with one cat5e cable: iperf -s -i 1 iperf -c X.Y.Z.T -t 60 -r just getting more confused.. :( Best Regards, t.a.k On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:22 AM, takCoder wrote: > hi everyone, > > this might be a bit off-topic but i am really confused and in need of your > helps.. :( > > i need to understand what exactly iperf does while testing network > throughput? > > i'm trying to run a throughput+frame loss test on a router using iperf, > and i am really confused with the definitions given for throughput and > packet-loss and iperf output.. > > as i have seen through my searches, throughput is the maximum transfer > rate at which we have no packet loss, so i thought i have to rerun iperf > for different transfer rate(in udp test), so i reach maximun rate while > having no drops... > > but i have seen test videos in which they ran iperf once, with maximum > bandwidth of the line, and just used the reported throughput and packet > loss as the required result! > > what's on? does iperf calculate the throughput independent from > packet-loss? and why is it reporting it named as bandwidth?? > > thank you all.. > > Kind regards, > takcoder > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 29 08:20:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53A6D71 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 08:20:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talayeh.asadi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x230.google.com (mail-ie0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6CFD2B9D for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 08:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id as1so7592861iec.35 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 01:20:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=n+nGZXA5VruOiiZqIebGsDPy0fA3NISyGS+RKoRBgQQ=; b=LBA0KPhfeHKyJZqMHZuCtqn2oqv0kyT7gU5vYuszb9Ye+XxhqB0QZDjTuPga0qR3iC cSCi+0v/WcqORId8BMMiz7w3z6plzPrC6tibT7Sf2cNS6ZqMylbON6LRwrT/YLJRnVfv bABn28nj+T4Kri0iP9k9IFiO0XswvKlR5XDhFqeSAIIpEnGzRsmcOlBzA/aqWQokQq3Z Db/u8sXo9Pzgyen8oOUfvW3QTvwSlUkY3iqxYszMXLogaCaNXND1C8AqYnavA8L/Cr9Y kJJ1QkEe8rD5ZTc1PAGrGhRktp6iKs9o7LvK4JXog1L2sa+v/iXH8IN7mCW12P8lkT3m FCcQ== X-Received: by 10.50.45.100 with SMTP id l4mr9132173igm.60.1380442850863; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 01:20:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: talayeh.asadi@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.153.8 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 01:20:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <04980532-FA66-4660-B1E0-0E4AF59025A5@lafn.org> References: <04980532-FA66-4660-B1E0-0E4AF59025A5@lafn.org> From: takCoder Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:50:30 +0330 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0bTihFgQby2noBknEeMKYQY_6CI Message-ID: Subject: Re: Throughput test with iperf... To: Doug Hardie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: tak.official@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 08:20:52 -0000 thanks for your reply.. :) i think it's iperf.. i installed /usr/ports/benchmarks/iperf port. where can i find iperf2? my machines are both FreeBsds but i can't find iperf2 in my ports collection.. Best Regards, t.a.k On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Doug Hardie wrote: > On 28 September 2013, at 23:38, takCoder wrote: > > > hi again.. > > > > would any of you please at least explain it to me what may cause iperf > > server ending up with "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" message right at > > the beginning of setting second connection in my bi-directional > throughput > > test, using -r flag?? > > > > i used these commands on client and server on two freebsd machines which > > are connected straight with one cat5e cable: > > > > iperf -s -i 1 > > iperf -c X.Y.Z.T -t 60 -r > > > > just getting more confused.. :( > > Are you using iperf or iperf2. Iperf has a few problems. Iperf2 is more > stable. > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 29 08:31:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED44AF72 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 08:31:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75782BFD for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 08:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.177.216.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r8T88THh065571 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 29 Sep 2013 01:08:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: Throughput test with iperf... From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 01:08:29 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <04980532-FA66-4660-B1E0-0E4AF59025A5@lafn.org> References: To: tak.official@gmail.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 08:31:54 -0000 On 28 September 2013, at 23:38, takCoder wrote: > hi again.. >=20 > would any of you please at least explain it to me what may cause iperf > server ending up with "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" message right = at > the beginning of setting second connection in my bi-directional = throughput > test, using -r flag?? >=20 > i used these commands on client and server on two freebsd machines = which > are connected straight with one cat5e cable: >=20 > iperf -s -i 1 > iperf -c X.Y.Z.T -t 60 -r >=20 > just getting more confused.. :( Are you using iperf or iperf2. Iperf has a few problems. Iperf2 is = more stable. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 29 09:11:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B81658F for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 09:11:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F152D3D for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 09:11:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.177.216.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r8T9AqOT066967 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 02:11:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: Throughput test with iperf... From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 02:11:46 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <11479658-E045-480A-B9CD-05CFAE6B1879@lafn.org> References: <04980532-FA66-4660-B1E0-0E4AF59025A5@lafn.org> To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 09:11:46 -0000 On 29 September 2013, at 01:20, takCoder wrote: > thanks for your reply.. :) >=20 > i think it's iperf.. i installed /usr/ports/benchmarks/iperf port. > where can i find iperf2? my machines are both FreeBsds but i can't = find iperf2 in my ports collection..=20 Bad memory - its iperf3. There is no port at this time. You find it = at: http://code.google.com/p/iperf/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 29 09:21:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28ECC945 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 09:21:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talayeh.asadi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x234.google.com (mail-ie0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED83E2DA0 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 09:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id u16so7384697iet.25 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 02:21:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=VVIOFpLu5zVnZ0d4JjtYg12ecFKp9fxz2hcUR2aCvME=; b=WpJmxhGpW2bdNpVCGQJOVLU25V1bhI9pFY8tk2QyDLv6hIYRhD5rjhFhnDl99Bd+A7 bXERv20e9sXBqaZisTvESqW5M46NbGT3I+31rUlJ7XG5sT61REGwtbUse5PwaRUFlBKF fyXKUWTVtUg+dRglyT7SLDLdc5R8P7wmuen+MUP6kM1JizUUjPREic456+J19N75ztG/ CbIvQj3+BpZ3aU8O1WwrzjUD7mqffLQ0I/Qnvug+JqaqC2fYcnZ815SWNyii1Rvr5fqg 7fPK2pdbdsKNY8qI5Ox/5gR344DEcZmCaQW7YgWXmFrHjK/a6w7Jqra2MmSMonmN/89w q0Og== X-Received: by 10.43.180.200 with SMTP id pf8mr212170icc.50.1380446493209; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 02:21:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: talayeh.asadi@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.153.8 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 02:21:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <11479658-E045-480A-B9CD-05CFAE6B1879@lafn.org> References: <04980532-FA66-4660-B1E0-0E4AF59025A5@lafn.org> <11479658-E045-480A-B9CD-05CFAE6B1879@lafn.org> From: takCoder Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 12:51:13 +0330 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Fx8tBQ_XnXEIYtMxHnmFZsZSW6g Message-ID: Subject: Re: Throughput test with iperf... To: Doug Hardie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: tak.official@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 09:21:34 -0000 Thank you, Doug, I'll check it :) Best Regards, t.a.k On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Doug Hardie wrote: > > On 29 September 2013, at 01:20, takCoder wrote: > > > thanks for your reply.. :) > > > > i think it's iperf.. i installed /usr/ports/benchmarks/iperf port. > > where can i find iperf2? my machines are both FreeBsds but i can't find > iperf2 in my ports collection.. > > Bad memory - its iperf3. There is no port at this time. You find it at: > > http://code.google.com/p/iperf/ > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 29 16:47:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C22A40 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 16:47:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF78C2E08 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 16:47:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r8TGlhkd007184; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 02:47:44 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 02:47:43 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Roland Smith Subject: Re: Is it possible to suspend to disk with geli+Root on ZFS installation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20130930015912.G67367@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: yudi v , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 16:47:53 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 486, Issue 7, Message: 5 On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 16:25:33 +0200 Roland Smith wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 05:37:55PM +1000, yudi v wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Is it possible to suspend to disk (hibernate) when using geli for full disk > > encryption. > > As far as I can tell, FreeBSD doesn't support suspend to disk on all > architectures. On amd64 the necessary infrastructure doesn't exist, and on > i386 FPU state is lost, there is no multiprocessor support and some MSRs are > not restored [1]. > > [1]: https://wiki.freebsd.org/SuspendResume Roland, sorry, no; you (and that page) are talking about Suspend to RAM, ACPI state S3. What you've said is correct re Suspend to RAM - though some running amd64 have achieved some success on some machines lately; most of the issues are with restoring modern video, backlight and such. Those i386 comments don't apply to my Thinkpad T23s, which suspend and resume, in console mode and X, flawlessly on 9.1-R and properly after various tweaks on 8.x, 7.x and 6.x - but they're a single core P3-M .. I must reiterate, FreeBSD does not support Suspend to Disk (state S4 aka 'hibernate') on ANY platform, except - perhaps - on machines supporting S4 in BIOS (hw.acpi.s4bios=1) which are very rarely spotted in the wild. > And even suspend to RAM doesn't work on every machine [2]. > > [2]: https://wiki.freebsd.org/IdeasPage#Suspend_to_disk That page IS about Suspend to Disk - but only as a wishlist idea, as it has been for many years. Someone did take it on as a Google SoC project years ago, but nothing ever came of it to my knowledge. The last laptop I have that will properly hibernate - ie save RAM and all state to disk and power off, then reload all RAM and state on power return - is a 300MHz Compaq Armada 1500C (mfg '98), but using the older APM BIOS rather than ACPI. (It's still running, 24/7/365 since 2002 :) cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 29 18:45:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7471FBA4 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 18:45:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAD3F22E3 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 18:45:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r8TIjg0P006743; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 20:45:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <52487556.5000601@bananmonarki.se> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 20:45:42 +0200 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130419 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: loran42o Subject: Re: How to ask a DNS resolver listening on a different port than the tcp/udp 53 References: <5245CC59.5060204@laposte.net> <524600CF.3040609@fjl.co.uk> <13463C66-C15D-48E0-B926-CA0BF6580CAD@elde.net> <52468723.5080701@laposte.net> In-Reply-To: <52468723.5080701@laposte.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 18:45:56 -0000 On 2013-09-28 09:37, loran42o wrote: > Le 28.09.2013 00:08, Terje Elde a écrit : >> On 28. sep. 2013, at 00:03, Frank Leonhardt wrote: >> >>> If I understand the way it works correctly, the resolver pulls a list of the NS and hard-sets the port number for each to 53 (via a manifest constant) . See libc/resolv/res_init.c. All you need to do(!) is change this to a value of your choice and recompile libc >> >> Sorry, but this is startin to look a lot like a complicated solution to a problem that isn't really there... >> >> Why not just point from resolv.conf to localhost, run a caching and/or recursive dns-server there, and point it whereever? >> >> As far as I can tell, that'd solve everything, add caching, and let it all be controlled from the config of the DNS-server? >> >> Terje > > Hi, > I guess this is the way that'll end. > > Laurent SALIN > You'll need to setup your bind.conf; zone "fqdn" IN { type forward; forward first; forwarders { 127.0.0.1 port 530; }; }; From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 29 19:11:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC04F31 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:11:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from salin.laurent@laposte.net) Received: from smtpout.laposte.net (smtpout6.laposte.net [193.253.67.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E98023DD for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.76.1] ([62.147.142.218]) by mwinf8512-out with ME id X7BB1m0094ivp8E037BEph; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 21:11:15 +0200 Message-ID: <52487B4F.9060806@laposte.net> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 21:11:11 +0200 From: Laurent SALIN User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130824 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to ask a DNS resolver listening on a different port than the tcp/udp 53 References: <5245CC59.5060204@laposte.net> In-Reply-To: <5245CC59.5060204@laposte.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:11:23 -0000 Hi, for the list archive, here's how I solved my "problem". Some on the thread tell me to run BIND on the 1rst VPS, as DNS autoritative server and as caching resolver who let only hosts from my network send him queries. Well I'm quite happy my setup with NSD as DNS autoritative and UNBOUND as caching resolver so I don't really want to change them for BIND, but i'd do it if this is the only way. I descide to focus on the 2nd VPS, the one who can't send queries directly to tcp/udp 5353, I configure UNBOUND to forward all queries to my 1rst VPS with few dedicated lines in the /usr/local/etc/unbound/unbound.conf: ...snip... forward-zone: name: "." forward-addr: "public_ip_v4"@5353 # forward to port 5353. forward-first: yes and modify my /etc/resolv.conf to only have localhost as nameserver. The system footprint of UNBOUND is very small so it's just fine to me. Thanks all for the help. Laurent SALIN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 29 22:14:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834A26A8; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 22:14:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ah@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49B832BEC; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 22:14:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id r8TME8EQ000972; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 16:14:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ah@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <5248A630.3030304@dreamchaser.org> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 16:14:08 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Felder Subject: Re: after pkgng update, daily run still using pkg_info References: <52470959.9050904@dreamchaser.org> <1380398226.30638.27610565.609ED96A@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1380398226.30638.27610565.609ED96A@webmail.messagingengine.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Sun, 29 Sep 2013 16:14:09 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 22:14:17 -0000 >>On 09/28/13 10:52, Gary Aitken wrote: >> After switching to pkgng, I noticed that my daily run output constantly >> complains about the installed packages being corrupt, e.g.: >> "pkg_info: the package info for package 'asciidoc-8.6.8_1' is corrupt" >> >> The problem is with >> etc/periodic/daily/490.status-pkg-changes >> which is still using "pkg_info" instead of "pkg info" >> >> Was this script supposed to be automatically updated as part of the >> conversion? What's the "right" way to upgrade this on a 9.1 release >> system? Or should I just edit the script by hand and be done with it? > >On 09/28/13 13:57, Mark Felder wrote: > Run pkg_info. If there is anything listed you have not fully converted > to pkgng and have some old broken/corrupt packages. You'll want to clean > this up. What does "clean this up" mean, and how does one go about it, given the system is converted to using pkgng? There is no /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db Some of the packages reported as corrupt were installed *after* the conversion to pkgng, so why is pkg_info even noticing them? "pkg info" reports 705 packages installed, and installs and re-installs using portmaster seem to be working. "pkg_info" reports 14 "good" packages and 658 "corrupt" packages. If pkg_info is picking up packages installed after the conversion, why doesn't the sum of good and corrupt packages equal the number pkg reports? It was my understanding that after switching to pkgng, the pkg_* cmds should no longer be used. If that's the case, shouldn't the daily script have been modified by the upgrade process? Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 04:09:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C727EF58; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 04:09:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9172A2865; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 04:09:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id r8U499as001782; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 22:09:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <5248F965.3030703@dreamchaser.org> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 22:09:09 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Felder Subject: Re: after pkgng update, daily run still using pkg_info References: <52470959.9050904@dreamchaser.org> <1380398226.30638.27610565.609ED96A@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1380398226.30638.27610565.609ED96A@webmail.messagingengine.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Sun, 29 Sep 2013 22:09:09 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 04:09:11 -0000 >>On 09/28/13 10:52, Gary Aitken wrote: >> After switching to pkgng, I noticed that my daily run output constantly >> complains about the installed packages being corrupt, e.g.: >> "pkg_info: the package info for package 'asciidoc-8.6.8_1' is corrupt" >> >> The problem is with >> etc/periodic/daily/490.status-pkg-changes >> which is still using "pkg_info" instead of "pkg info" >> >> Was this script supposed to be automatically updated as part of the >> conversion? What's the "right" way to upgrade this on a 9.1 release >> system? Or should I just edit the script by hand and be done with it? > >On 09/28/13 13:57, Mark Felder wrote: > Run pkg_info. If there is anything listed you have not fully converted > to pkgng and have some old broken/corrupt packages. You'll want to clean > this up. What does "clean this up" mean, and how does one go about it, given the system is converted to using pkgng? There is no /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db Some of the packages reported as corrupt were installed *after* the conversion to pkgng, so why is pkg_info even noticing them? "pkg info" reports 705 packages installed, and installs and re-installs using portmaster seem to be working. "pkg_info" reports 14 "good" packages and 658 "corrupt" packages. If pkg_info is picking up packages installed after the conversion, why doesn't the sum of good and corrupt packages equal the number pkg reports? It was my understanding that after switching to pkgng, the pkg_* cmds should no longer be used. If that's the case, shouldn't the daily script have been modified by the upgrade process? Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 07:15:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3C3241; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:15:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B66182F00; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:15:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.local ([78.133.112.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r8U7DBRn038262 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:13:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk r8U7DBRn038262 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/r8U7DBRn038262; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (unprotected policy) X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host [78.133.112.70] claimed to be seedling.local Message-ID: <52492480.5080105@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:13:04 +0200 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org Subject: Re: after pkgng update, daily run still using pkg_info References: <52470959.9050904@dreamchaser.org> <1380398226.30638.27610565.609ED96A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <5248F965.3030703@dreamchaser.org> In-Reply-To: <5248F965.3030703@dreamchaser.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sJ3djkSh2DGsho76ILtAgX2KrWU6SDxmI" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DCC_CHECK, RCVD_IN_XBL,RDNS_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:15:58 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --sJ3djkSh2DGsho76ILtAgX2KrWU6SDxmI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 30/09/2013 06:09, Gary Aitken wrote: >>> On 09/28/13 10:52, Gary Aitken wrote: >>> After switching to pkgng, I noticed that my daily run output constant= ly >>> complains about the installed packages being corrupt, e.g.: >>> "pkg_info: the package info for package 'asciidoc-8.6.8_1' is corru= pt" >>> >>> The problem is with >>> etc/periodic/daily/490.status-pkg-changes >>> which is still using "pkg_info" instead of "pkg info" >>> >>> Was this script supposed to be automatically updated as part of the >>> conversion? What's the "right" way to upgrade this on a 9.1 release >>> system? Or should I just edit the script by hand and be done with it= ? >> >> On 09/28/13 13:57, Mark Felder wrote: >> Run pkg_info. If there is anything listed you have not fully converted= >> to pkgng and have some old broken/corrupt packages. You'll want to cle= an >> this up. >=20 > What does "clean this up" mean, and how does one go about it, given the= > system is converted to using pkgng? There is no /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db >=20 > Some of the packages reported as corrupt were installed *after* the > conversion to pkgng, so why is pkg_info even noticing them? > "pkg info" reports 705 packages installed, and installs and re-installs= > using portmaster seem to be working. "pkg_info" reports 14 "good" > packages and 658 "corrupt" packages. If pkg_info is picking up package= s > installed after the conversion, why doesn't the sum of good and corrupt= > packages equal the number pkg reports? >=20 > It was my understanding that after switching to pkgng, the pkg_* cmds s= hould > no longer be used. If that's the case, shouldn't the daily script have= been > modified by the upgrade process? Hi, Gary, Yes, you're correct that the pkg_info command should no longer be used after pkgng-ifying your system. Not because it's harmful or lead to any sort of breakage but simply because it won't return any meaningful information. Ideally, there shouldn't really be any of the old style package metadata left in /var/db/pkg after running pkg2ng but the conversion process may occasionaly stumble over the odd port or two. (In which case force the port in question to re-install. If you're using a package repository, that's 'pkg install -f pkgname' -- otherwise, just use the normal portmaster / portupgrade command you'ld have used pre-pkgn= g.) If you are a portmaster user be aware that it does store various bits to do with managing distfiles in /var/db/pkg/pkgname-ver/ subdirectories. These shouldn't be confused with old style pkg_install metadata -- the distinguishing feature is if they contain a +CONTENTS file. As to why pkg2ng doesn't disable pkg_install related periodic jobs -- pretty much because no one has implemented that. pkg comes with it's own set of periodic job scripts which should give you the equivalent set of reports via the pkg local database, so all we'd need to do is turn off any old pkg_install script and turn on the pkg equivalent. I've just created a new issue on github for that: https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/issues/599 Patches -- or even better, pull requests -- are welcome. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --sJ3djkSh2DGsho76ILtAgX2KrWU6SDxmI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iKYEARECAGYFAlJJJIZfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEI1NTUyQTk2Mjc0RUQyNDg1NzM0MEVCNEYw QzhFNEU3NjBBRTkwOEMACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyaTwCgh5zNB1be8vR09eWat2ELPDB+ 3VgAmwcAd8R0/o3aTu2cGYrV4Fs++CJY =1gnk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sJ3djkSh2DGsho76ILtAgX2KrWU6SDxmI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 11:35:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0EDA48 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:35:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 820CE2ED1 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316632111B for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:34:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:34:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to :references; s=smtpout; bh=0s888/si3Xt6f97O7hSU++Cp5Y4=; b=cH2Ra 025dd0vZWDC5oolH31UO88Cl4skUejQ7Cq4vfodICzr/TT7ILb8h1HJJKC0E7Zfd EhVPlNyW5hlg7KBCjR7azM8NoCyxY0mvi4B34YTx0f3GYk/qbI++wfksfingz0el gWcXhO3TJQO3Lj+Q53xifcs+DeAEvx3mnZYEAY= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id 1330EB01EBC; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:34:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1380540898.14383.28105213.268545DC@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: JW3f7c6ybGGectX2P0PrR6srNYVHipEAWYe6gPKbg6oK 1380540898 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-ce174988 Subject: Re: after pkgng update, daily run still using pkg_info Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 06:34:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5248F965.3030703@dreamchaser.org> References: <52470959.9050904@dreamchaser.org> <1380398226.30638.27610565.609ED96A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <5248F965.3030703@dreamchaser.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:35:00 -0000 On Sun, Sep 29, 2013, at 23:09, Gary Aitken wrote: > > Some of the packages reported as corrupt were installed *after* the > conversion to pkgng, so why is pkg_info even noticing them? > The only way this is possible is if they are in the old package format. Did you happen to convert your packages to pkgng and then install some software from ports without putting WITH_PKGNG=YES in your make.conf? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 11:46:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200C5B89 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:46:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karangarg31@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com (mail-ob0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E237E2F45 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:46:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id gq1so4859515obb.12 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 04:46:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=NtetQhj0qJY5X93GkdeJQfijypwlpzz6y5JIpZp+LGk=; b=Xii/clu/DMpJdRwt9XLF7k7jYXR4av8aE1GwBKIymHfGaoYvZ6lGpYj+R5gZoW0q9i wnwSW6EIuLhyeYVClQ/UNvhuvb/B8de4tGGVqzqj7G6uAXI4GJrQm3cvgtiIR2L5eTAE IAvUfeunDSNW0iaB3oPFyKKC1YP5gI7Qr1DJrbOHbNE2+8VONjEPGtoZFFknSse8cks3 x4g2HFeevwtEr0HvX2butx0MLvk8oi4Cmw9OxCpJMIYGDZdIWSPJ5zW44rIyOEsP2U1V hpiegHq8d8sgHfciXFglPasrCFj9tu7RU/aiqKJr2/ot4fVPQASmIC1M//281tGaQ3i5 jGDA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.62.4 with SMTP id u4mr5934745oer.35.1380541614191; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 04:46:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.45.229 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 04:46:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:16:54 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Contributing to FreeBSD From: karan garg To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:46:55 -0000 Hi all, I am an open source enthusiast and new to freeBSD community. I am an RHCE and have a reasonable knowledge of linux administration, database, Bash Scripting, and C/C++. I want to contribute to the community. I have gone through the FreeBSD handbook, and list of various projects under the community. However, I was unable to determine a suitable project for me to get started. So, I would really appreciate if you could help me find a project that would require my field of knowledge. Also, I wish to apply for GSOC-2014 and have checked the ideas page but found the similar problems as above. Also, if you could give me a link of resources and handbook for me to go through before starting to contribute. -- Regards :) Karan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 11:59:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CBDCF8 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:59:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com (mail-wi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 998142FD5 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:59:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hn9so3695372wib.11 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 04:59:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=0AzRqbpWQCqZJ2aRDtbX+9bOOmL+pc6iqEWe1cmYnjY=; b=XHXrZ+Bx3CE1jA6CpWVV8w8uGJj3FHnDeok9Ve1mnt582uKErMJepKWvmNs6JUNEf4 eO1DSY3NFrOp3JtuWG+Zi4bZIc8xO3tqe8QFMWVbnmYb2Q+S2uY717Ez8wOYPqNkHFNq rQjH1uU7O9Y+VeKs/b267B+aRPIsQhZtpCaOIQ9hl8n56GwfOFS3nC+99II69yLiKy9B qKdAlJ2o4SpboxQalqriOEIpXtS+0u/SX9FzrrsFiI7YZ/qGL0hpUcVM5OOIL9pCwWri fGJjN4/25dpfhTeKF71L0fcp+09ioA2FJyThlYx3IFXH4teOGMytvfIRMYGrlssjZEiq dNuw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.85.65 with SMTP id f1mr13347313wiz.33.1380542395083; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 04:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.84.163 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 04:59:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:59:54 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Contributing to FreeBSD From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= To: karan garg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: User Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:59:57 -0000 On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:46 PM, karan garg wrote: > Hi all, > > I am an open source enthusiast and new to freeBSD community. I am an RHCE > and have a reasonable knowledge of linux administration, database, Bash > Scripting, and C/C++. > > I want to contribute to the community. I have gone through the FreeBSD > handbook, and list of various projects under the community. However, I was > unable to determine a suitable project for me to get started. So, I would > really appreciate if you could help me find a project that would require my > field of knowledge. > I suppose that depends on your interests and your habilities. You can check the Ideas Page: https://wiki.freebsd.org/IdeasPage Ports need work too, so you can try to port something new that people want: https://wiki.freebsd.org/WantedPorts or adopt an orphaned port: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=36243 Contributing documentation is always welcomed AFAIK. Cheers. > > Also, I wish to apply for GSOC-2014 and have checked the ideas page but > found the similar problems as above. > > Also, if you could give me a link of resources and handbook for me to go > through before starting to contribute. > > > -- > Regards :) > Karan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 12:30:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81FC7C0B for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:30:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-qa0-x229.google.com (mail-qa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32B8E226A for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:30:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id ii20so2247089qab.14 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 05:30:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=piszHBDoxFrMLMt/n9mFRo4MEQrwbt3twx9AywGu2IY=; b=gupZR7teRxxEjyimzIaAR8Mm+sbbS774KlrIsC7e2AvKw3UcsihRd9xy1+kJVFuk6y tU10hfPqASD3VgSz9XYGwEl1D9e2E3smR9n9UD6chxYrGQcL/IEyomA+Ot5apdXD5ATV EDI3nWtF92zlBIDuZeD69RdokEUAOQ6jC/9RM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:organization:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=piszHBDoxFrMLMt/n9mFRo4MEQrwbt3twx9AywGu2IY=; b=a7N4grNoM1zSRg2UiDBMFZd3Ieh6MrH3e8haKmXvCep7xgr8YjaUGs3Zk3lcFkxEod 4TtHZRmCILLCkakY/TZuRbyBTn4f5jjmySEB1WblhNTCr0orrSrUrnKW+BsLrh8T0H59 gEl9j5R7KFwpS0qttTpzQDJf9H7i8+e4PgQzfhSxEafMsmeMCgLSld0yMZcQMaIiMJvm US1+v/CFeK4cNGZuM4zEHLQRxBAgpoUzV+FOnPVpGnKUeUw+KDrs9PwR1C/N6gdqIXIx ntiakpiaNpClk+OS0NA1D2Ydwxn2uN6glaqs4hbVI05aLW8R/Up8mi2NTMpA5Kbsb+MT S37Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmZuAjYfO3iW5bL0jpSnbNdQ9zmYe5bu58ln7q3MPECLhkEOf2xPLti92a/F8ykNdVka52m X-Received: by 10.224.127.6 with SMTP id e6mr13565335qas.67.1380544235956; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 05:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g2sm1020246qaf.12.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 05:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3cpNHZ4sL2z2CG48 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:30:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:30:34 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Contributing to FreeBSD Message-ID: <20130930083034.7d5bf2ff@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:30:37 -0000 On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:16:54 +0530 karan garg articulated: > Hi all, > > I am an open source enthusiast and new to freeBSD community. I am an > RHCE and have a reasonable knowledge of linux administration, > database, Bash Scripting, and C/C++. > > I want to contribute to the community. I have gone through the FreeBSD > handbook, and list of various projects under the community. However, > I was unable to determine a suitable project for me to get started. > So, I would really appreciate if you could help me find a project > that would require my field of knowledge. > > Also, I wish to apply for GSOC-2014 and have checked the ideas page > but found the similar problems as above. > > Also, if you could give me a link of resources and handbook for me to > go through before starting to contribute. Well, if you really want a suggestion, you could try updating the "linux_base-f10-10_7" port that was released by Fedora on November 25, 2008 to something newer, say the Fedora 19, released July 2, 2013. -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 14:05:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BADA3C1 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:05:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-qc0-x233.google.com (mail-qc0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F284329EC for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id l4so3662514qcv.10 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:05:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:organization:face :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VrQqYg80fQKQA94VNEGKj48J/PREN9JmUuijTJGRymc=; b=EdVvfBIdXwIZmRwLDkCNPfYFk7MIIGyMFRj9ghzFpX+CRLSoubY87/isYkSOE6cbZu vZShOp7kPNDvJtOO26F7T+BsrdHGFGWCe7issQYrKUE/zEzrYIhflgjEfS7NdgSeVazB 1+Hw5iA1YT6XdEPnGbgSLQh1bM7rAJ+u4Hu8Y= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :organization:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VrQqYg80fQKQA94VNEGKj48J/PREN9JmUuijTJGRymc=; b=BWDYTTT7otAmCxovklkoaZ4bq45j4xm48FKaO6nmdDJP97lsZLLGZQYROLt2pQLYmS eswMrMZ1XT6EtOG/vjETtFTyOoxkHP8Emw2E4z/z6GM3X2miM5C6pLNBUSMdEclBG5Ny OfHJ6yI+ZhpAIJHrMvOiQGS/aRRNLN7C8YEtMeHXMM+X+Y9pizT9XuLrvwU2i8jj51z/ eTBtqmaNYa4wukw+NWEPkEgNcvqMJ+fvipoHZmKfI7GOw8Iey9EHuYKv34Vjf+R++4hK HeCp2WxI9uunLUPec4ttUuT535y2hDsPBHpcsUwZjO/Aiix+nwWfUyo2u18vDrQhmxtY HsOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnFrrodErwV1Zl28oG7FcnY6bpr5rkSaic6TYY+3u/A03wcQ8If35+L/ow2QbC7sHWzG0Et X-Received: by 10.224.152.6 with SMTP id e6mr13961015qaw.56.1380549952828; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:05:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u8sm1241349qef.3.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:05:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3cpQPW2QLRz2CG48 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:05:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:05:50 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Subject: Vulnerability Message-ID: <20130930100550.084cb740@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:05:54 -0000 Has this been rectified: -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 14:24:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663C71F5; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:24:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailist@yandex.com) Received: from forward12.mail.yandex.net (forward12.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8AA2B7D; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:24:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web20j.yandex.ru (web20j.yandex.ru [5.45.198.61]) by forward12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 829E1C20C17; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:24:19 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web20j.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 2001121C112A; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:24:19 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1380551059; bh=ONjFzKmW7tCc91koiKpiD5jqX7ihsLRQa2OqTdC7PQk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=DJSsdGhLqI3J+udMRKa1HY35cdGgYOUhJfCjjwSZAfuwh6pMzzC/L7O6ESJOL9WcQ WENCPVgbn/dF3eQngO6J54XwRy9Qqszz5LGTfB6IieY6WzvDI6U+E+vTyCPN+QuoC+ /OoNDecfl5x/x1UlDj7ymd6HJgt9lI0gKwHaIicA= Received: from 78.161.169.103.dynamic.ttnet.com.tr (78.161.169.103.dynamic.ttnet.com.tr [78.161.169.103]) by web20j.yandex.ru with HTTP; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:24:18 +0400 From: =?utf-8?B?RW1yZSDDh2FtYWxhbg==?= Envelope-From: mailist@yandex.com.tr To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD quest Subject: cause of reboot MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <519911380551058@web20j.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:24:18 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:24:22 -0000 Hi, my server reboots every night and same o'clock last 10 days. But this machine's uptime was 96days. Suddenly reboot this machine and now this continue every night again and again. I didn't find any reason and I didn't change anything else. I looked "last" command, reboot ~ ~ AM 03.15 ~ I checked "dmesg -a" , it has only generic things no other things. I checked "/var/log/messages" I wrote script and checked swapinfo , cpu and memory but all of them was normal before reboot. I checked crontab and scripts. I checked "crashinfo" but no dump from kernel. I didn't find any useful info from this commands. I checked "praudit /var/audir/20130930..CrashRecovery" and I didn't understand very well from this file but I think this means my machine crash and reboot isn't it?? And How can I understand what is the reason of rebooting my FreeBSD8.3 server. Please help I need to find cause of reboot.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 14:30:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C43D550 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:30:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karangarg31@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-x230.google.com (mail-oa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17FF22C15 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id m6so3812436oag.35 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:30:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=KN3HLUuVH0Lr/1luHo4rSvKjsWDsflhrsCMUFkNctO0=; b=iaF9jit2DLW2y/AL2JRKXldHoBrSCQDEFMqeyl5FHa8PHqdiEIr6v4hz1L17POvs9J 80iEU1+zbtenRGn4oH/yXIklS0FEyfghdrkxBLvSnr9dnycYUaI6KTFEbyfx3mV11tYO SneQA4zLzNORNIFXSdUvDgoJQd0cHY0kWYK2HyNPUKtcgJhT2MQQ2GEUvbVk3U+q8onC Q4PXlKR/bIh6OkObQ0+Z1shYzoE4jRgQCOeD6CdbwTG+ofBO+HwbHeHX5jtC8AKl4IBx EpDLnEbJS5q4wEH78gtqD4LdufXdGL98AL+yQIqehboVDt4tDzkCkPzWAqQgumwEJLYI teSw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.39.161 with SMTP id q1mr982634obk.54.1380551444312; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:30:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.45.229 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:30:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130930083034.7d5bf2ff@scorpio> References: <20130930083034.7d5bf2ff@scorpio> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:00:44 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Contributing to FreeBSD From: karan garg To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:30:45 -0000 On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Jerry wrote: > On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:16:54 +0530 > karan garg articulated: > > > Hi all, > > > > I am an open source enthusiast and new to freeBSD community. I am an > > RHCE and have a reasonable knowledge of linux administration, > > database, Bash Scripting, and C/C++. > > > > I want to contribute to the community. I have gone through the FreeBSD > > handbook, and list of various projects under the community. However, > > I was unable to determine a suitable project for me to get started. > > So, I would really appreciate if you could help me find a project > > that would require my field of knowledge. > > > > Also, I wish to apply for GSOC-2014 and have checked the ideas page > > but found the similar problems as above. > > > > Also, if you could give me a link of resources and handbook for me to > > go through before starting to contribute. > > Well, if you really want a suggestion, you could try updating the > "linux_base-f10-10_7" port that was released by Fedora on November 25, > 2008 to something newer, say the Fedora 19, released July 2, 2013. > > Thanks Jerry, But as this is my first experience, can you give me some links to go through before I start? According to what I found, portsnap is one of the tools that will help me for this. Also, is this the correct mailing list to keep posting on for this purpose? > -- > Jerry =E2=99=94 > > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. > __________________________________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 Regards :) Karan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 14:33:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B79D61C for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:33:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@dataix.net) Received: from mail-ie0-x233.google.com (mail-ie0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02EBE2C40 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id e14so10382085iej.38 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:33:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dataix.net; s=rsa; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=rP6Qg8QwvwXib/0vb1AaupUvXQSx4DbxKuwEJ0nRSRc=; b=a9BcE9n+gnp6JXJFPbn+OK4FIAVe5rPVooBAL40a02GkhbT8t1nBUM5riwxOzm2tO3 ZL5Bgjc8WCgik7hdY8BcLASS4/bxzMiQ8FpxQ0TtiRUbxR75SOFNMqZ+oe9Q4cMFyx20 di9lQRV4KZXiqxftj7jUjYrgNoTJCwoW5pj9s= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=rP6Qg8QwvwXib/0vb1AaupUvXQSx4DbxKuwEJ0nRSRc=; b=Nbzl9bT028G3b9mhOUnxM+6cNB9UUsbzhR/HzVcCY+W65WwPIIQALd5xe3qX9q428N KlX3BywTAIJF0XYpFoIvMhOKuql3DNfwKDZxMKzDdpEJ6/Doc3nkIrFUn/D/uBzeLE7S hxG2aFPyxFXDGJS0A1flajp83onR/yZYqEXsAfP1mr7sCUlKNEY3ITe+SxWlAru56zZE 3nU8gFCFwY+HAgwQwSPP0XgVH3omsgd7xq+Vtf28vSO7yGh/TmgB2+PtKjG6E+QhkjGn 0ov7IGstNarTtx1JW/ksPk8ZNRa0QH+vvbFTU23MBBHXxITXpmqGXLUM4GHhkAznQF+Q LDSw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkxf6BHYuVOzV8kE2QO8R6WE/s263G7FffmQUNvzn5KePVfjVK+Gfz4Mfj0IMuwn2pRqAez X-Received: by 10.50.87.33 with SMTP id u1mr14067346igz.42.1380551634401; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.31.35.7] (24-236-193-75.dhcp.aldl.mi.charter.com. [24.236.193.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i3sm17089622igh.0.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:33:52 -0700 (PDT) References: <519911380551058@web20j.yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <519911380551058@web20j.yandex.ru> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-CCEA6650-828B-4E55-A647-BFB8BDAED824; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <96AD54CD-4EA8-46A4-A0C1-36B7E6F0B52E@dataix.net> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11A501) From: Jason Hellenthal Subject: Re: cause of reboot Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:33:49 -0400 To: =?utf-8?Q?Emre_=C3=87amalan?= Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD quest X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:33:55 -0000 --Apple-Mail-CCEA6650-828B-4E55-A647-BFB8BDAED824 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Did you check for the command reboot in all of the periodic scripts and cron= jobs as well as the command shutdown ? On Sep 30, 2013, at 10:24, Emre =C3=87amalan wrote: Hi, my server reboots every night and same o'clock last 10 days. But this machin= e's uptime was 96days. Suddenly reboot this machine and now this continue every night again and aga= in. I didn't find any reason and I didn't change anything else. I looked "last" command,=20 reboot ~ ~ AM 03.15 ~ I checked "dmesg -a" , it has only generic things no other things. I checked "/var/log/messages" I wrote script and checked swapinfo , cpu and memory but all of them was nor= mal before reboot. I checked crontab and scripts. I checked "crashinfo" but no dump from kernel. I didn't find any useful info from this commands. I checked "praudit /var/audir/20130930..CrashRecovery" and I didn't understand very well from this file but I think this means my m= achine crash and reboot isn't it?? And How can I understand what is the reason of rebooting my FreeBSD8.3 serve= r. Please help I need to find cause of reboot.. _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --Apple-Mail-CCEA6650-828B-4E55-A647-BFB8BDAED824 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIUOTCCBjAw ggUYoAMCAQICAwaijjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFADCBjDELMAkGA1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0 YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKzApBgNVBAsTIlNlY3VyZSBEaWdpdGFsIENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNpZ25pbmcx ODA2BgNVBAMTL1N0YXJ0Q29tIENsYXNzIDEgUHJpbWFyeSBJbnRlcm1lZGlhdGUgQ2xpZW50IENB MB4XDTEzMDUxODA4NTA0OFoXDTE0MDUxOTIyMDk0N1owSDEfMB0GA1UEAwwWamhlbGxlbnRoYWxA ZGF0YWl4Lm5ldDElMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYWamhlbGxlbnRoYWxAZGF0YWl4Lm5ldDCCASIwDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBALgnYFS1bWZr3KhKBzWAdRwrY+En+RRV8nCaYubqrMG+ YJbuenaIKSbIuFiDWipW4RHYTpE28pKaSnaVTG9WtAZvsWj0gYN9g2fYCnCOUceES2Yvi3RavxpB hsuzKIfsHb8iNNSEuczLu6gn4mQyaHwE4x6xSUKmbK8njR+YoF522F60wjsnq5dlOJdTrhDfObE5 5P23279WbRp8azgZX1VRB66wdKRDuSI1vBts4Nsha2paXd6HUUduHrPACBQREJTGXN8XtEKVwo63 aKUhRgtUwHNEuSWck/xwVl7PBUWH2dORAWTCqHjNuCKNOQ1/0LMiyMj7FdsBjN4dgL4YZpsCAwEA AaOCAtwwggLYMAkGA1UdEwQCMAAwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgSwMB0GA1UdJQQWMBQGCCsGAQUFBwMCBggr BgEFBQcDBDAdBgNVHQ4EFgQU29qUrmZtgQ7ZVoDKogfpJOSfk+YwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUU3Ltkpzg 2ssBXHx+ljVO8tS4UYIwIQYDVR0RBBowGIEWamhlbGxlbnRoYWxAZGF0YWl4Lm5ldDCCAUwGA1Ud IASCAUMwggE/MIIBOwYLKwYBBAGBtTcBAgMwggEqMC4GCCsGAQUFBwIBFiJodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0 YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9wb2xpY3kucGRmMIH3BggrBgEFBQcCAjCB6jAnFiBTdGFydENvbSBDZXJ0aWZp Y2F0aW9uIEF1dGhvcml0eTADAgEBGoG+VGhpcyBjZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSB3YXMgaXNzdWVkIGFjY29y ZGluZyB0byB0aGUgQ2xhc3MgMSBWYWxpZGF0aW9uIHJlcXVpcmVtZW50cyBvZiB0aGUgU3RhcnRD b20gQ0EgcG9saWN5LCByZWxpYW5jZSBvbmx5IGZvciB0aGUgaW50ZW5kZWQgcHVycG9zZSBpbiBj b21wbGlhbmNlIG9mIHRoZSByZWx5aW5nIHBhcnR5IG9ibGlnYXRpb25zLjA2BgNVHR8ELzAtMCug KaAnhiVodHRwOi8vY3JsLnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9jcnR1MS1jcmwuY3JsMIGOBggrBgEFBQcBAQSB gTB/MDkGCCsGAQUFBzABhi1odHRwOi8vb2NzcC5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vc3ViL2NsYXNzMS9jbGll bnQvY2EwQgYIKwYBBQUHMAKGNmh0dHA6Ly9haWEuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL2NlcnRzL3N1Yi5jbGFz czEuY2xpZW50LmNhLmNydDAjBgNVHRIEHDAahhhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS8wDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQELBQADggEBAHsw8/Hw07gsNTKYnld74NBFtHnQOPkXYuccWx3j0PGQe9nqNxeingBf 2yvx+xBQzBoi4J1u84Jbrbe8Ii3+LLD/QMW9cN0SBIgRStPQLVee4STdjeabGmpXQa7omC02wYYO 83qh6CgJEIbmrsBSZH8ZSVrjkC4UmZS8wAQMS3qTWAPF0ZQGWx2+Gks2fXuacyt2LpNR+p9ogjAZ 1/rmUKjNhQZLswytaLRUdwAwSfQ3+TNs68h6Kv1LC3bNGBT3NEtr2q/nzzb5MzuFcDE6f9exroAC 4BHmokAprhna/vZdb6BrPjpXgRAlWAh3wEMxw75M9S/Nbzj/jNp+I+lvUJYwggY0MIIEHKADAgEC AgEeMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMH0xCzAJBgNVBAYTAklMMRYwFAYDVQQKEw1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQu MSswKQYDVQQLEyJTZWN1cmUgRGlnaXRhbCBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTaWduaW5nMSkwJwYDVQQDEyBT dGFydENvbSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1dGhvcml0eTAeFw0wNzEwMjQyMTAxNTVaFw0xNzEwMjQy MTAxNTVaMIGMMQswCQYDVQQGEwJJTDEWMBQGA1UEChMNU3RhcnRDb20gTHRkLjErMCkGA1UECxMi U2VjdXJlIERpZ2l0YWwgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2lnbmluZzE4MDYGA1UEAxMvU3RhcnRDb20gQ2xh c3MgMSBQcmltYXJ5IEludGVybWVkaWF0ZSBDbGllbnQgQ0EwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IB DwAwggEKAoIBAQDHCYPMzi3YGrEppC4Tq5a+ijKDjKaIQZZVR63UbxIP6uq/I0fhCu+cQhoUfE6E RKKnu8zPf1Jwuk0tsvVCk6U9b+0UjM0dLep3ZdE1gblK/1FwYT5Pipsu2yOMluLqwvsuz9/9f1+1 PKHG/FaR/wpbfuIqu54qzHDYeqiUfsYzoVflR80DAC7hmJ+SmZnNTWyUGHJbBpA8Q89lGxahNvur yGaC/o2/ceD2uYDX9U8Eg5DpIpGQdcbQeGarV04WgAUjjXX5r/2dabmtxWMZwhZna//jdiSyrrSM TGKkDiXm6/3/4ebfeZuCYKzN2P8O2F/Xe2AC/Y7zeEsnR7FOp+uXAgMBAAGjggGtMIIBqTAPBgNV HRMBAf8EBTADAQH/MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUU3Ltkpzg2ssBXHx+ljVO8tS4 UYIwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUTgvvGqRAW6UXaYcwyjRoQ9BBrvIwZgYIKwYBBQUHAQEEWjBYMCcGCCsG AQUFBzABhhtodHRwOi8vb2NzcC5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vY2EwLQYIKwYBBQUHMAKGIWh0dHA6Ly93 d3cuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL3Nmc2NhLmNydDBbBgNVHR8EVDBSMCegJaAjhiFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0 YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9zZnNjYS5jcmwwJ6AloCOGIWh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL3Nmc2Nh LmNybDCBgAYDVR0gBHkwdzB1BgsrBgEEAYG1NwECATBmMC4GCCsGAQUFBwIBFiJodHRwOi8vd3d3 LnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9wb2xpY3kucGRmMDQGCCsGAQUFBwIBFihodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0c3Ns LmNvbS9pbnRlcm1lZGlhdGUucGRmMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4ICAQAKgwh9eKssBly4Y4xerhy5 I3dNoXHYfYa8PlVLL/qtXnkFgdtY1o95CfegFJTwqBBmf8pyTUnFsukDFUI22zF5bVHzuJ+GxhnS qN2sD1qetbYwBYK2iyYA5Pg7Er1A+hKMIzEzcduRkIMmCeUTyMyikfbUFvIBivtvkR8ZFAk22BZy +pJfAoedO61HTz4qSfQoCRcLN5A0t4DkuVhTMXIzuQ8CnykhExD6x4e6ebIbrjZLb7L+ocR0y4Yj Cl/Pd4MXU91y0vTipgr/O75CDUHDRHCCKBVmz/Rzkc/b970MEeHt5LC3NiWTgBSvrLEuVzBKM586 YoRD9Dy3OHQgWI270g+5MYA8GfgI/EPT5G7xPbCDz+zjdH89PeR3U4So4lSXur6H6vp+m9TQXPF3 a0LwZrp8MQ+Z77U1uL7TelWO5lApsbAonrqASfTpaprFVkL4nyGH+NHST2ZJPWIBk81i6Vw0ny0q ZW2Niy/QvVNKbb43A43ny076khXO7cNbBIRdJ/6qQNq9Bqb5C0Q5nEsFcj75oxQRqlKf6TcvGbjx kJh8BYtv9ePsXklAxtm8J7GCUBthHSQgepbkOexhJ0wP8imUkyiPHQ0GvEnd83129fZjoEhdGwXV 27ioRKbj/cIq7JRXun0NbeY+UdMYu9jGfIpDLtUUGSgsg2zMGs5R4jCCB8kwggWxoAMCAQICAQEw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwfTELMAkGA1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKzAp BgNVBAsTIlNlY3VyZSBEaWdpdGFsIENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNpZ25pbmcxKTAnBgNVBAMTIFN0YXJ0 Q29tIENlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gQXV0aG9yaXR5MB4XDTA2MDkxNzE5NDYzNloXDTM2MDkxNzE5NDYz NlowfTELMAkGA1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKzApBgNVBAsTIlNlY3Vy ZSBEaWdpdGFsIENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNpZ25pbmcxKTAnBgNVBAMTIFN0YXJ0Q29tIENlcnRpZmlj YXRpb24gQXV0aG9yaXR5MIICIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAg8AMIICCgKCAgEAwYjbCbxsRnx4 n5V7tTOQ8nJi1sE2ICIkXs7pd/JDCqIGZKTMjjb4OOYj8G5tsTzdcqOFHKHTPbQzK9Mvr/7qsEFZ Z7bEBn0KnnSF1nlMgDd63zkFUln39BtGQ6TShYXSw3HzdWI0uiyKfx6P7u000BHHls1SPboz1t1N 3gs7SkufwiYv+rUWHHI1d8o8XebK4SaLGjZ2XAHbdBQl/u21oIgP3XjKLR8HlzABLXJ5+kbWEyqo uaarg0kd5fLv3eQBjhgKj2NTFoViqQ4ZOsy1ZqbCa3QH5Cvhdj60bdj2ROFzYh87xL6gU1YlbFEJ 96qryr92/W2b853bvz1mvAxWqq+YSJU6S9+nWFDZOHWpW+pDDAL/mevobE1wWyllnN2qXcyvATHs DOvSjejqnHvmbvcnZgwaSNduQuM/3iE+e+ENcPtjqqhsGlS0XCV6yaLJixamuyx+F14FTVhuEh0B 7hIQDcYyfxj//PT6zW6R6DZJvhpIaYvClk0aErJpF8EKkNb6eSJIv7p7afhwx/p6N9jYDdJ2T1f/ kLfjkdLd78Jgt2c63f6qnPDUi39yIs7Gn5e2+K+KoBCo2fsYxra1XFI8ibYZKnMBCg8DsxJg8nov gdujbv8mMJf1i92JV7atPbOvK8W3dgLwpdYrmoYUKnL24zOMXQlLE9+7jHQTUksCAwEAAaOCAlIw ggJOMAwGA1UdEwQFMAMBAf8wCwYDVR0PBAQDAgGuMB0GA1UdDgQWBBROC+8apEBbpRdphzDKNGhD 0EGu8jBkBgNVHR8EXTBbMCygKqAohiZodHRwOi8vY2VydC5zdGFydGNvbS5vcmcvc2ZzY2EtY3Js LmNybDAroCmgJ4YlaHR0cDovL2NybC5zdGFydGNvbS5vcmcvc2ZzY2EtY3JsLmNybDCCAV0GA1Ud IASCAVQwggFQMIIBTAYLKwYBBAGBtTcBAQEwggE7MC8GCCsGAQUFBwIBFiNodHRwOi8vY2VydC5z dGFydGNvbS5vcmcvcG9saWN5LnBkZjA1BggrBgEFBQcCARYpaHR0cDovL2NlcnQuc3RhcnRjb20u b3JnL2ludGVybWVkaWF0ZS5wZGYwgdAGCCsGAQUFBwICMIHDMCcWIFN0YXJ0IENvbW1lcmNpYWwg KFN0YXJ0Q29tKSBMdGQuMAMCAQEagZdMaW1pdGVkIExpYWJpbGl0eSwgcmVhZCB0aGUgc2VjdGlv biAqTGVnYWwgTGltaXRhdGlvbnMqIG9mIHRoZSBTdGFydENvbSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1dGhv cml0eSBQb2xpY3kgYXZhaWxhYmxlIGF0IGh0dHA6Ly9jZXJ0LnN0YXJ0Y29tLm9yZy9wb2xpY3ku cGRmMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIABzA4BglghkgBhvhCAQ0EKxYpU3RhcnRDb20gRnJlZSBTU0wg Q2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggIBABZsmfRmDDT10IVefQrs 2hBOOBxe36YlBUuRMsHoO/E93UQJWwdJiinLZgK3sZr3JZgJPI4b4d02hytLu2jTOWY9oCbH8jmR HVGrgnt+1c5a5OIDV3Bplwj5XlimCt+MBppFFhY4Cl5X9mLHegIF5rwetfKe9Kkpg/iyFONuKIdE w5Aa3jipPKxDTWRFzt0oqVzyc3sE+Bfoq7HzLlxkbnMxOhK4vLMR5H2PgVGaO42J9E2TZns8A+3T mh2a82VQ9aDQdZ8vr/DqgkOY+GmciXnEQ45GcuNkNhKv9yUeOImQd37Da2q5w8tES6x4kIvnxywe SxFEyDRSJ80KXZ+FwYnVGnjylRBTMt2AhGZ12bVoKPthLr6EqDjAmRKGpR5nZK0GLi+pcIXHlg98 iWX1jkNUDqvdpYA5lGDANMmWcCyjEvUfSHu9HH5rt52Q9CI7rvj8Ksr6glKg769LVZPrwbXwIous NE4mIgShhyx1SrflfRPXuAxkwDbSyS+GEowjCcEbgjtzSaNqV4eU5dZ4xZlDY+NN4Hct4WWZcmkE GkcJ5g8BViT7H78OealYLrnECQF+lbptAAY+supKEDnY0Cv1v+x1v5cCxQkbCNxVN+KB+zeEQ2Ig yudWS2Xq/mzBJJMkoTTrBf+aIq6bfT/xZVEKpjBqs/SIHIAN/HKK6INeMYIDbzCCA2sCAQEwgZQw gYwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAklMMRYwFAYDVQQKEw1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQuMSswKQYDVQQLEyJTZWN1cmUg RGlnaXRhbCBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTaWduaW5nMTgwNgYDVQQDEy9TdGFydENvbSBDbGFzcyAxIFBy aW1hcnkgSW50ZXJtZWRpYXRlIENsaWVudCBDQQIDBqKOMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggGvMBgGCSqGSIb3 DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTEzMDkzMDE0MzM1MVowIwYJKoZIhvcN AQkEMRYEFPpOtDKhBxmdSl0O8ijLpy1q0kpDMIGlBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgZcwgZQwgYwxCzAJBgNV BAYTAklMMRYwFAYDVQQKEw1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQuMSswKQYDVQQLEyJTZWN1cmUgRGlnaXRhbCBD ZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTaWduaW5nMTgwNgYDVQQDEy9TdGFydENvbSBDbGFzcyAxIFByaW1hcnkgSW50 ZXJtZWRpYXRlIENsaWVudCBDQQIDBqKOMIGnBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzGBl6CBlDCBjDELMAkGA1UE BhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKzApBgNVBAsTIlNlY3VyZSBEaWdpdGFsIENl cnRpZmljYXRlIFNpZ25pbmcxODA2BgNVBAMTL1N0YXJ0Q29tIENsYXNzIDEgUHJpbWFyeSBJbnRl cm1lZGlhdGUgQ2xpZW50IENBAgMGoo4wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEggEAkQDDGzRw29f9t7R1YPOV HtYZmruG0Jpf1BLV9Zg8ccbuR37oxTRyiwbt+VHuDpN5jC/8wrZj18kkRqJI09DbSShNPgBo0uVT j18nD5vsGIUBY02YiG9v8sADkdRU5/7BQ50mQMZMpECtdYLUBZZaggO4aZxibhOqvjla5skual64 B+bZPCcpGYFe4fakjVdS229F+8wBtJebRHzp0cE5cS6vD4SfpEhjZ3sD27B4NRIKr8Zx5utQQ5jA ImebeA66oSb6AQcO5RuBcb7K8ZNJetF7pF9Dt+F1U5rnHlI3jrMz6mKTI3ryruA7vjA6S+fxzZbS QBYWXfMcvzl3XxEoSAAAAAAAAA== --Apple-Mail-CCEA6650-828B-4E55-A647-BFB8BDAED824-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 14:49:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0A6C89; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:49:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (uk1rly2283-a.eechost.net [217.69.47.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F291A2D10; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:49:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [31.186.37.179] (helo=smtp.marelmo.com) by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VQeaH-00061l-IE; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:36:25 +0100 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com) by smtp.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VQebL-0002RH-Sd; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:37:31 +0000 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:37:31 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: Emre =?UTF-8?B?w4dhbWFsYW4=?= Subject: Re: cause of reboot Message-Id: <20130930153731.50497d00b18198c678e18ef2@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <519911380551058@web20j.yandex.ru> References: <519911380551058@web20j.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Auth-Info: 15567@permanet.ie (plain) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD quest X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:49:23 -0000 On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:24:18 +0300 Emre Çamalan wrote: > Hi, > my server reboots every night and same o'clock last 10 days. But this > machine's uptime was 96days. > > Suddenly reboot this machine and now this continue every night again and > again. > > I didn't find any reason and I didn't change anything else. > > I looked "last" command, > reboot ~ ~ AM 03.15 ~ That's likely something in the daily run going wrong, try disabling items in there one by one (by editing /etc/periodic.conf - which probably doesn't yet exist so create it and look in /etc/defaults/periodic.conf for details) until you get through a night without a reboot. Then the next step is to figure out why whatever is crashing the system does so, but first let's find out what. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 14:57:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD13DAC for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:57:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@staticsafe.ca) Received: from uriel.asininetech.com (uriel.asininetech.com [IPv6:2607:5300:60:e3a::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60F302D77 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:57:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by uriel.asininetech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED138E0A83 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:56:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from uriel.asininetech.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (uriel.asininetech.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id o_fdhFZ1iXYh for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:56:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1d:96b:16da:e9ff:fe0e:a291] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1d:96b:16da:e9ff:fe0e:a291]) by uriel.asininetech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2986E03D0 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:56:51 -0400 (EDT) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.6.8 uriel.asininetech.com C2986E03D0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=staticsafe.ca; s=2013; t=1380553011; bh=FYPJGtWC9jFzvZ9BaYTD2zbpX6zTz7OPrIHdonbntkY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ePkP8CgOsswLniPjeuy2MCWpoju3Z2oGFRUXlJPQAGQ3++qELUKWQzRgL6Ykc9AmE 0Ob3rmV4RwewDPBtU/K/BeimMuL/atQDuaH18M6dxn4vVkqne4CibjXfLztx/UeKcB VW3AM5vD8cYGL9FdnyYZO3Uh4JDMT/Gbx5t5uncY= Message-ID: <52499130.5010801@staticsafe.ca> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:56:48 -0400 From: staticsafe User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Vulnerability References: <20130930100550.084cb740@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20130930100550.084cb740@scorpio> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:57:01 -0000 On 9/30/2013 10:05, Jerry wrote: > Has this been rectified: > > Yes. http://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-13:13.nullfs.asc http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=255442 -- staticsafe O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org Please don't top post. It is not logical. Please don't CC me! I'm subscribed to whatever list I just posted on. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 14:58:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF58E4D for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:58:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7909C2D89 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:58:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA8E33C49 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:58:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 736B639830; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:58:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Vulnerability References: <20130930100550.084cb740@scorpio> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:58:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130930100550.084cb740@scorpio> (jerry@seibercom.net's message of "Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:05:50 -0400") Message-ID: <44ob7a1hmt.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:58:15 -0000 Jerry writes: > Has this been rectified: > If you read the page at that link, you will find the answer. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 15:00:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644E6EF5; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:00:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailist@yandex.com) Received: from forward20.mail.yandex.net (forward20.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1402::5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173102DC6; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:00:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web8g.yandex.ru (web8g.yandex.ru [95.108.252.108]) by forward20.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 9355B1041A0C; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:00:22 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web8g.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 1D33D134081A; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:00:22 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1380553222; bh=v7v5EGmqbMN+Sea94QYOJPwzMlTMwQikbT6yjId9JZ0=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date; b=DQ8RLmdNukMKzrbHrdUVXYTgERGL6ceJZM98McZycCWJfQEYGKlb4xYV89XiT+r8U MXTS+iAzJYyXGMpMH1N7kcO2Ky94lrIbuJ+ZawDR+byp45adV+AAUJfv9XxqSOh8ZE Wyp1IHxWz48TlIdhBzQmkCyvCJ2tfmUpDrmlGcDA= Received: from 78.161.169.103.dynamic.ttnet.com.tr (78.161.169.103.dynamic.ttnet.com.tr [78.161.169.103]) by web8g.yandex.ru with HTTP; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:00:21 +0400 From: =?utf-8?B?RW1yZSDDh2FtYWxhbg==?= Envelope-From: mailist@yandex.com.tr To: Jason Hellenthal In-Reply-To: <96AD54CD-4EA8-46A4-A0C1-36B7E6F0B52E@dataix.net> References: <519911380551058@web20j.yandex.ru> <96AD54CD-4EA8-46A4-A0C1-36B7E6F0B52E@dataix.net> Subject: Re: cause of reboot MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <80361380553221@web8g.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:00:21 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD quest X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:00:24 -0000 Yes I checked also it , such as ; "grep -i 'reboot' /root/scripts/* -R" "grep -i 'halt' /root/scripts/* -R" "grep -i 'shutdown' /root/scripts/* -R" 30.09.2013, 17:33, "Jason Hellenthal" : > Did you check for the command reboot in all of the periodic scripts and cron jobs as well as the command shutdown ? > > On Sep 30, 2013, at 10:24, Emre Çamalan wrote: > > Hi, > my server reboots every night and same o'clock last 10 days. But this machine's uptime was 96days. > > Suddenly reboot this machine and now this continue every night again and again. > > I didn't find any reason and I didn't change anything else. > > I looked "last" command, > reboot ~ ~   AM 03.15  ~ > > I checked "dmesg -a" , it has only generic things no other things. > > I checked "/var/log/messages" > > I wrote script and checked swapinfo , cpu and memory but all of them was normal before reboot. > > I checked crontab and scripts. > > I checked "crashinfo"  but no dump from kernel. > > I didn't find any useful info from this commands. > > I checked "praudit /var/audir/20130930..CrashRecovery" > and I didn't understand very well from this file but I think this means my machine crash and reboot isn't it?? > > And How can I understand what is the reason of rebooting my FreeBSD8.3 server. > > Please help I need to find cause of reboot.. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 15:04:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A332ED for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:04:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbirch@jbirch.net) Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6201D2DF9 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:04:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id aq17so10444512iec.41 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:03:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+iJwfIYj9PUJbqHSQEqAsWyi6booKKleeIwJ6K1A4c0=; b=bPDr56sn17jf4sjNa5p67iij04ypSMNx132MCeeKZ1J021mM+MvopY+p5zc6uq2niq qMXBiMmoOoSXxuW/ueUDrQ91KXALZHedlDPFrolZWibgT0kD+Xba7zNcQz/at7Mun0K2 2LS6T+AHhbZGEp3Uftn6fklMxSyrmE7lNVIpUfsZUFpu11nu7SYgCaTRZgmnCwsdfzEs IN3B+7jev2REvio07eBTNXMqaT9kIGovkIbx8/pZFiksI38aOjlHUywQPFAhjlS33C5r TeQM8RburENMETGDW8GPQCPvvtHzTjpxkDF5eoWivXglju+n+FgRxfyjW8BOhcCuxKUi 4XiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmQGYThLxOC7O0/9e+eY0DKuQKW9SsVq+ZH6QOqu0WjG//t3HtciuAY2fT42tuM2DypeSsZ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.250.201 with SMTP id mp9mr16901028icb.0.1380552961826; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:56:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.94.136 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 07:56:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [110.147.187.58] In-Reply-To: <20130930100550.084cb740@scorpio> References: <20130930100550.084cb740@scorpio> Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 00:56:01 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Vulnerability From: Jason Birch To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:04:04 -0000 This was announced on security-advisories@freebsd.org on September 10th, 2013. The relevant commits, as taken from the announcement, are: Branch/path Revision - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- stable/8/ r255445 releng/8.3/ r255446 releng/8.4/ r255447 stable/9/ r255443 releng/9.1/ r255448 releng/9.2/ r255444 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Jerry wrote: > Has this been rectified: > > > -- > Jerry =E2=99=94 > > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. > __________________________________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 15:07:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7543A4A1 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:07:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@dataix.net) Received: from mail-ie0-x22e.google.com (mail-ie0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B7182E2C for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:07:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id u16so10272927iet.5 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:07:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dataix.net; s=rsa; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=654IrZUkE2Du8dAW4EkSYggDm/LwbvfKB4Z2Wxmk31I=; b=LHHHi8rSwFRBhRocRcO7y0s79FfULuv3l2Q/VK0p2hxT53DGGT0j6XVM4PWIn1gzr5 fUibV2gtyovarJJ1CpscpcdmzEOpfwPJUh65WjDA6Cr4SKTe7LFu45vcc1uDH5v30HCc sqZNS9OUfq0bee5AJhxF8mWJX5nIIlsQJ1+YU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=654IrZUkE2Du8dAW4EkSYggDm/LwbvfKB4Z2Wxmk31I=; b=kmgKWG0zP8XSr7E08hLGcBgQvgMNBKoFepPlDWQVKRAeojmvPCg3MXArV6e2iZf592 VG1zIK7tas2RgOqKcp6spKw3oj+QIkb1r46VSyeutZNdqwNFk1kMIjRqLEhzMHqWQgAX L/s8z6ew2pqD2d7ysWV6RQUc9plQi6YHNS9BFw3zF0EKtvgykR83JtS4b435xu/WMToo PK3tB8mQSmtB56+EeFXZAkRe+NzJ8lKanCKNQBah8re1RoSdXeDTEDuxArgYFB9IfWCy A5RZMhHtHT+Kdt9sjEh3HwdMYQqdgvkoKKq4kYLAY2b3t/eb7g8SEbFkCD+PoznndLK6 reQA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQljskAZlluL6lNwkVCIoZLXpue/R8bOwEICFWAWywcV8U/NkmFE24AzVuvlE9j6YJxTHsjL X-Received: by 10.50.225.3 with SMTP id rg3mr14299477igc.28.1380553623547; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:07:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.31.35.7] (24-236-193-75.dhcp.aldl.mi.charter.com. [24.236.193.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x5sm17178712iga.6.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:07:01 -0700 (PDT) References: <519911380551058@web20j.yandex.ru> <96AD54CD-4EA8-46A4-A0C1-36B7E6F0B52E@dataix.net> <80361380553221@web8g.yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <80361380553221@web8g.yandex.ru> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-7B17A8D4-2A64-4422-9E9D-C73762A70CE4; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <21CB70DD-F2F1-43F4-9730-FB12C46317B0@dataix.net> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11A501) From: Jason Hellenthal Subject: Re: cause of reboot Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:06:58 -0400 To: =?utf-8?Q?Emre_=C3=87amalan?= Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD quest X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:07:04 -0000 --Apple-Mail-7B17A8D4-2A64-4422-9E9D-C73762A70CE4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable And /etc/ ? And /var/cron ? On Sep 30, 2013, at 11:00, Emre =C3=87amalan wrote: Yes I checked also it , such as ; "grep -i 'reboot' /root/scripts/* -R" "grep -i 'halt' /root/scripts/* -R" "grep -i 'shutdown' /root/scripts/* -R" 30.09.2013, 17:33, "Jason Hellenthal" : > Did you check for the command reboot in all of the periodic scripts and cr= on jobs as well as the command shutdown ? >=20 > On Sep 30, 2013, at 10:24, Emre =C3=87amalan wrote: >=20 > Hi, > my server reboots every night and same o'clock last 10 days. But this mach= ine's uptime was 96days. >=20 > Suddenly reboot this machine and now this continue every night again and a= gain. >=20 > I didn't find any reason and I didn't change anything else. >=20 > I looked "last" command, > reboot ~ ~ AM 03.15 ~ >=20 > I checked "dmesg -a" , it has only generic things no other things. >=20 > I checked "/var/log/messages" >=20 > I wrote script and checked swapinfo , cpu and memory but all of them was n= ormal before reboot. >=20 > I checked crontab and scripts. >=20 > I checked "crashinfo" but no dump from kernel. >=20 > I didn't find any useful info from this commands. >=20 > I checked "praudit /var/audir/20130930..CrashRecovery" > and I didn't understand very well from this file but I think this means my= machine crash and reboot isn't it?? >=20 > And How can I understand what is the reason of rebooting my FreeBSD8.3 ser= ver. >=20 > Please help I need to find cause of reboot.. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"= --Apple-Mail-7B17A8D4-2A64-4422-9E9D-C73762A70CE4 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIUOTCCBjAw ggUYoAMCAQICAwaijjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFADCBjDELMAkGA1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0 YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKzApBgNVBAsTIlNlY3VyZSBEaWdpdGFsIENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNpZ25pbmcx ODA2BgNVBAMTL1N0YXJ0Q29tIENsYXNzIDEgUHJpbWFyeSBJbnRlcm1lZGlhdGUgQ2xpZW50IENB MB4XDTEzMDUxODA4NTA0OFoXDTE0MDUxOTIyMDk0N1owSDEfMB0GA1UEAwwWamhlbGxlbnRoYWxA ZGF0YWl4Lm5ldDElMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYWamhlbGxlbnRoYWxAZGF0YWl4Lm5ldDCCASIwDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBALgnYFS1bWZr3KhKBzWAdRwrY+En+RRV8nCaYubqrMG+ YJbuenaIKSbIuFiDWipW4RHYTpE28pKaSnaVTG9WtAZvsWj0gYN9g2fYCnCOUceES2Yvi3RavxpB hsuzKIfsHb8iNNSEuczLu6gn4mQyaHwE4x6xSUKmbK8njR+YoF522F60wjsnq5dlOJdTrhDfObE5 5P23279WbRp8azgZX1VRB66wdKRDuSI1vBts4Nsha2paXd6HUUduHrPACBQREJTGXN8XtEKVwo63 aKUhRgtUwHNEuSWck/xwVl7PBUWH2dORAWTCqHjNuCKNOQ1/0LMiyMj7FdsBjN4dgL4YZpsCAwEA AaOCAtwwggLYMAkGA1UdEwQCMAAwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgSwMB0GA1UdJQQWMBQGCCsGAQUFBwMCBggr BgEFBQcDBDAdBgNVHQ4EFgQU29qUrmZtgQ7ZVoDKogfpJOSfk+YwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUU3Ltkpzg 2ssBXHx+ljVO8tS4UYIwIQYDVR0RBBowGIEWamhlbGxlbnRoYWxAZGF0YWl4Lm5ldDCCAUwGA1Ud IASCAUMwggE/MIIBOwYLKwYBBAGBtTcBAgMwggEqMC4GCCsGAQUFBwIBFiJodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0 YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9wb2xpY3kucGRmMIH3BggrBgEFBQcCAjCB6jAnFiBTdGFydENvbSBDZXJ0aWZp Y2F0aW9uIEF1dGhvcml0eTADAgEBGoG+VGhpcyBjZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSB3YXMgaXNzdWVkIGFjY29y ZGluZyB0byB0aGUgQ2xhc3MgMSBWYWxpZGF0aW9uIHJlcXVpcmVtZW50cyBvZiB0aGUgU3RhcnRD b20gQ0EgcG9saWN5LCByZWxpYW5jZSBvbmx5IGZvciB0aGUgaW50ZW5kZWQgcHVycG9zZSBpbiBj b21wbGlhbmNlIG9mIHRoZSByZWx5aW5nIHBhcnR5IG9ibGlnYXRpb25zLjA2BgNVHR8ELzAtMCug KaAnhiVodHRwOi8vY3JsLnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9jcnR1MS1jcmwuY3JsMIGOBggrBgEFBQcBAQSB gTB/MDkGCCsGAQUFBzABhi1odHRwOi8vb2NzcC5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vc3ViL2NsYXNzMS9jbGll bnQvY2EwQgYIKwYBBQUHMAKGNmh0dHA6Ly9haWEuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL2NlcnRzL3N1Yi5jbGFz czEuY2xpZW50LmNhLmNydDAjBgNVHRIEHDAahhhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS8wDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQELBQADggEBAHsw8/Hw07gsNTKYnld74NBFtHnQOPkXYuccWx3j0PGQe9nqNxeingBf 2yvx+xBQzBoi4J1u84Jbrbe8Ii3+LLD/QMW9cN0SBIgRStPQLVee4STdjeabGmpXQa7omC02wYYO 83qh6CgJEIbmrsBSZH8ZSVrjkC4UmZS8wAQMS3qTWAPF0ZQGWx2+Gks2fXuacyt2LpNR+p9ogjAZ 1/rmUKjNhQZLswytaLRUdwAwSfQ3+TNs68h6Kv1LC3bNGBT3NEtr2q/nzzb5MzuFcDE6f9exroAC 4BHmokAprhna/vZdb6BrPjpXgRAlWAh3wEMxw75M9S/Nbzj/jNp+I+lvUJYwggY0MIIEHKADAgEC AgEeMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMH0xCzAJBgNVBAYTAklMMRYwFAYDVQQKEw1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQu MSswKQYDVQQLEyJTZWN1cmUgRGlnaXRhbCBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTaWduaW5nMSkwJwYDVQQDEyBT dGFydENvbSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1dGhvcml0eTAeFw0wNzEwMjQyMTAxNTVaFw0xNzEwMjQy MTAxNTVaMIGMMQswCQYDVQQGEwJJTDEWMBQGA1UEChMNU3RhcnRDb20gTHRkLjErMCkGA1UECxMi U2VjdXJlIERpZ2l0YWwgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2lnbmluZzE4MDYGA1UEAxMvU3RhcnRDb20gQ2xh c3MgMSBQcmltYXJ5IEludGVybWVkaWF0ZSBDbGllbnQgQ0EwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IB DwAwggEKAoIBAQDHCYPMzi3YGrEppC4Tq5a+ijKDjKaIQZZVR63UbxIP6uq/I0fhCu+cQhoUfE6E RKKnu8zPf1Jwuk0tsvVCk6U9b+0UjM0dLep3ZdE1gblK/1FwYT5Pipsu2yOMluLqwvsuz9/9f1+1 PKHG/FaR/wpbfuIqu54qzHDYeqiUfsYzoVflR80DAC7hmJ+SmZnNTWyUGHJbBpA8Q89lGxahNvur yGaC/o2/ceD2uYDX9U8Eg5DpIpGQdcbQeGarV04WgAUjjXX5r/2dabmtxWMZwhZna//jdiSyrrSM TGKkDiXm6/3/4ebfeZuCYKzN2P8O2F/Xe2AC/Y7zeEsnR7FOp+uXAgMBAAGjggGtMIIBqTAPBgNV HRMBAf8EBTADAQH/MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUU3Ltkpzg2ssBXHx+ljVO8tS4 UYIwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUTgvvGqRAW6UXaYcwyjRoQ9BBrvIwZgYIKwYBBQUHAQEEWjBYMCcGCCsG AQUFBzABhhtodHRwOi8vb2NzcC5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vY2EwLQYIKwYBBQUHMAKGIWh0dHA6Ly93 d3cuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL3Nmc2NhLmNydDBbBgNVHR8EVDBSMCegJaAjhiFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0 YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9zZnNjYS5jcmwwJ6AloCOGIWh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL3Nmc2Nh LmNybDCBgAYDVR0gBHkwdzB1BgsrBgEEAYG1NwECATBmMC4GCCsGAQUFBwIBFiJodHRwOi8vd3d3 LnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9wb2xpY3kucGRmMDQGCCsGAQUFBwIBFihodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0c3Ns LmNvbS9pbnRlcm1lZGlhdGUucGRmMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4ICAQAKgwh9eKssBly4Y4xerhy5 I3dNoXHYfYa8PlVLL/qtXnkFgdtY1o95CfegFJTwqBBmf8pyTUnFsukDFUI22zF5bVHzuJ+GxhnS qN2sD1qetbYwBYK2iyYA5Pg7Er1A+hKMIzEzcduRkIMmCeUTyMyikfbUFvIBivtvkR8ZFAk22BZy +pJfAoedO61HTz4qSfQoCRcLN5A0t4DkuVhTMXIzuQ8CnykhExD6x4e6ebIbrjZLb7L+ocR0y4Yj Cl/Pd4MXU91y0vTipgr/O75CDUHDRHCCKBVmz/Rzkc/b970MEeHt5LC3NiWTgBSvrLEuVzBKM586 YoRD9Dy3OHQgWI270g+5MYA8GfgI/EPT5G7xPbCDz+zjdH89PeR3U4So4lSXur6H6vp+m9TQXPF3 a0LwZrp8MQ+Z77U1uL7TelWO5lApsbAonrqASfTpaprFVkL4nyGH+NHST2ZJPWIBk81i6Vw0ny0q ZW2Niy/QvVNKbb43A43ny076khXO7cNbBIRdJ/6qQNq9Bqb5C0Q5nEsFcj75oxQRqlKf6TcvGbjx kJh8BYtv9ePsXklAxtm8J7GCUBthHSQgepbkOexhJ0wP8imUkyiPHQ0GvEnd83129fZjoEhdGwXV 27ioRKbj/cIq7JRXun0NbeY+UdMYu9jGfIpDLtUUGSgsg2zMGs5R4jCCB8kwggWxoAMCAQICAQEw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwfTELMAkGA1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKzAp BgNVBAsTIlNlY3VyZSBEaWdpdGFsIENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNpZ25pbmcxKTAnBgNVBAMTIFN0YXJ0 Q29tIENlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gQXV0aG9yaXR5MB4XDTA2MDkxNzE5NDYzNloXDTM2MDkxNzE5NDYz NlowfTELMAkGA1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKzApBgNVBAsTIlNlY3Vy ZSBEaWdpdGFsIENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNpZ25pbmcxKTAnBgNVBAMTIFN0YXJ0Q29tIENlcnRpZmlj YXRpb24gQXV0aG9yaXR5MIICIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAg8AMIICCgKCAgEAwYjbCbxsRnx4 n5V7tTOQ8nJi1sE2ICIkXs7pd/JDCqIGZKTMjjb4OOYj8G5tsTzdcqOFHKHTPbQzK9Mvr/7qsEFZ Z7bEBn0KnnSF1nlMgDd63zkFUln39BtGQ6TShYXSw3HzdWI0uiyKfx6P7u000BHHls1SPboz1t1N 3gs7SkufwiYv+rUWHHI1d8o8XebK4SaLGjZ2XAHbdBQl/u21oIgP3XjKLR8HlzABLXJ5+kbWEyqo uaarg0kd5fLv3eQBjhgKj2NTFoViqQ4ZOsy1ZqbCa3QH5Cvhdj60bdj2ROFzYh87xL6gU1YlbFEJ 96qryr92/W2b853bvz1mvAxWqq+YSJU6S9+nWFDZOHWpW+pDDAL/mevobE1wWyllnN2qXcyvATHs DOvSjejqnHvmbvcnZgwaSNduQuM/3iE+e+ENcPtjqqhsGlS0XCV6yaLJixamuyx+F14FTVhuEh0B 7hIQDcYyfxj//PT6zW6R6DZJvhpIaYvClk0aErJpF8EKkNb6eSJIv7p7afhwx/p6N9jYDdJ2T1f/ kLfjkdLd78Jgt2c63f6qnPDUi39yIs7Gn5e2+K+KoBCo2fsYxra1XFI8ibYZKnMBCg8DsxJg8nov gdujbv8mMJf1i92JV7atPbOvK8W3dgLwpdYrmoYUKnL24zOMXQlLE9+7jHQTUksCAwEAAaOCAlIw ggJOMAwGA1UdEwQFMAMBAf8wCwYDVR0PBAQDAgGuMB0GA1UdDgQWBBROC+8apEBbpRdphzDKNGhD 0EGu8jBkBgNVHR8EXTBbMCygKqAohiZodHRwOi8vY2VydC5zdGFydGNvbS5vcmcvc2ZzY2EtY3Js LmNybDAroCmgJ4YlaHR0cDovL2NybC5zdGFydGNvbS5vcmcvc2ZzY2EtY3JsLmNybDCCAV0GA1Ud IASCAVQwggFQMIIBTAYLKwYBBAGBtTcBAQEwggE7MC8GCCsGAQUFBwIBFiNodHRwOi8vY2VydC5z dGFydGNvbS5vcmcvcG9saWN5LnBkZjA1BggrBgEFBQcCARYpaHR0cDovL2NlcnQuc3RhcnRjb20u b3JnL2ludGVybWVkaWF0ZS5wZGYwgdAGCCsGAQUFBwICMIHDMCcWIFN0YXJ0IENvbW1lcmNpYWwg KFN0YXJ0Q29tKSBMdGQuMAMCAQEagZdMaW1pdGVkIExpYWJpbGl0eSwgcmVhZCB0aGUgc2VjdGlv biAqTGVnYWwgTGltaXRhdGlvbnMqIG9mIHRoZSBTdGFydENvbSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1dGhv cml0eSBQb2xpY3kgYXZhaWxhYmxlIGF0IGh0dHA6Ly9jZXJ0LnN0YXJ0Y29tLm9yZy9wb2xpY3ku cGRmMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIABzA4BglghkgBhvhCAQ0EKxYpU3RhcnRDb20gRnJlZSBTU0wg Q2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggIBABZsmfRmDDT10IVefQrs 2hBOOBxe36YlBUuRMsHoO/E93UQJWwdJiinLZgK3sZr3JZgJPI4b4d02hytLu2jTOWY9oCbH8jmR HVGrgnt+1c5a5OIDV3Bplwj5XlimCt+MBppFFhY4Cl5X9mLHegIF5rwetfKe9Kkpg/iyFONuKIdE w5Aa3jipPKxDTWRFzt0oqVzyc3sE+Bfoq7HzLlxkbnMxOhK4vLMR5H2PgVGaO42J9E2TZns8A+3T mh2a82VQ9aDQdZ8vr/DqgkOY+GmciXnEQ45GcuNkNhKv9yUeOImQd37Da2q5w8tES6x4kIvnxywe SxFEyDRSJ80KXZ+FwYnVGnjylRBTMt2AhGZ12bVoKPthLr6EqDjAmRKGpR5nZK0GLi+pcIXHlg98 iWX1jkNUDqvdpYA5lGDANMmWcCyjEvUfSHu9HH5rt52Q9CI7rvj8Ksr6glKg769LVZPrwbXwIous NE4mIgShhyx1SrflfRPXuAxkwDbSyS+GEowjCcEbgjtzSaNqV4eU5dZ4xZlDY+NN4Hct4WWZcmkE GkcJ5g8BViT7H78OealYLrnECQF+lbptAAY+supKEDnY0Cv1v+x1v5cCxQkbCNxVN+KB+zeEQ2Ig yudWS2Xq/mzBJJMkoTTrBf+aIq6bfT/xZVEKpjBqs/SIHIAN/HKK6INeMYIDbzCCA2sCAQEwgZQw gYwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAklMMRYwFAYDVQQKEw1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQuMSswKQYDVQQLEyJTZWN1cmUg RGlnaXRhbCBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTaWduaW5nMTgwNgYDVQQDEy9TdGFydENvbSBDbGFzcyAxIFBy aW1hcnkgSW50ZXJtZWRpYXRlIENsaWVudCBDQQIDBqKOMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggGvMBgGCSqGSIb3 DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTEzMDkzMDE1MDcwMFowIwYJKoZIhvcN AQkEMRYEFFvMxTFFJUWiZhLDVK+EkAj9PJ52MIGlBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgZcwgZQwgYwxCzAJBgNV BAYTAklMMRYwFAYDVQQKEw1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQuMSswKQYDVQQLEyJTZWN1cmUgRGlnaXRhbCBD ZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTaWduaW5nMTgwNgYDVQQDEy9TdGFydENvbSBDbGFzcyAxIFByaW1hcnkgSW50 ZXJtZWRpYXRlIENsaWVudCBDQQIDBqKOMIGnBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzGBl6CBlDCBjDELMAkGA1UE BhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKzApBgNVBAsTIlNlY3VyZSBEaWdpdGFsIENl cnRpZmljYXRlIFNpZ25pbmcxODA2BgNVBAMTL1N0YXJ0Q29tIENsYXNzIDEgUHJpbWFyeSBJbnRl cm1lZGlhdGUgQ2xpZW50IENBAgMGoo4wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEggEAt4zv/15HlDF7fe/gCJO/ 9CP+DluEmtHHpusRErtQep7IFS2oQT+7Meo2xqrgSLyfkbml19QBb+2r6WtqrLKnUdDX4F3dA43o UtShF1HJtrKo0sE2NTHOo3S127fQ67O0IxB5XMGyu5paEItM/di8IWHbbpPpxp0softQLU53NtyY Ydm8gdPMhKAfeZDJeYqk1qeJxSDW9Us/nXn81Wl6o/ssM5qXTe+ZnoBeAOWqYdQMnupMeKKN+eAw I/dE/7oEIyA2xv4iCQ5VLmZqMeDVT/qYnqr0akYitZb/3fAkVV5VWeCV6e+OJB7Yqf18NbHuWasr raX23Om8cECs5b6zPQAAAAAAAA== --Apple-Mail-7B17A8D4-2A64-4422-9E9D-C73762A70CE4-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 15:08:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730C362C for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:08:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@dataix.net) Received: from mail-ie0-x236.google.com (mail-ie0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38DE32E4E for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:08:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id aq17so10662806iec.27 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:08:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dataix.net; s=rsa; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=MiU45fGpQMyrKOn17yoS7cJTIBfqqu0kKh2oDxAeUrE=; b=SPCCfA+F4xibUuyOzdtjDokAR5QUU1pW+ZwoVR0yDc09zeKoen48O5yU2vji8lSYJ+ H2NPWRLNcGn1IMCEiwl1uD9qmqRSQfkK6OOc7Xi3IHBmDnxvv0RZPy79fA+d9cc7HouD /Uv/RWxWFvM/SAkc3kaFqLEgcAWzEfp2qASZo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=MiU45fGpQMyrKOn17yoS7cJTIBfqqu0kKh2oDxAeUrE=; b=ElhmnIDBUTv0GbG32qvVIcLbnyS0CHvO3Z3XukyOZLmyckNkbTfWdu603YDN/dsPey I+0DJ7iC7klZV5pgnbDJ/orneRFotQvzEvFoRR+6egL4uTdg3gLEXHKvxEaBILFsOCfC AGPOMvqqMajdLhM/Qw4iVsz4iY//ioqXFC9+/u5FyOH1Fc6V1hs/L95tLjPp8MYg4qWd 7juZrpvJ0tZUuoqhPsvKBik51fW7Zy1gozMAjdqXrctqrKqqtcPYo88HRFqs0zC0AAhA txxQ2b5SBx85ip7k6uJSR7Zf4wcUtwYAsxzToA07cGhNqOFFkQEvuQfmlDQQekwYsi5r ueNg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnMnR+luOLpODYemGUWhSgLvmlE09+VtkeQqpeIBYvPEeQZpEEM86ounaAjGrqeFjuXopXb X-Received: by 10.50.110.74 with SMTP id hy10mr14134952igb.0.1380553712511; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:08:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.31.35.7] (24-236-193-75.dhcp.aldl.mi.charter.com. [24.236.193.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k6sm17174732igx.8.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:08:30 -0700 (PDT) References: <519911380551058@web20j.yandex.ru> <96AD54CD-4EA8-46A4-A0C1-36B7E6F0B52E@dataix.net> <80361380553221@web8g.yandex.ru> <21CB70DD-F2F1-43F4-9730-FB12C46317B0@dataix.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <21CB70DD-F2F1-43F4-9730-FB12C46317B0@dataix.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-3B45B3E8-58A5-4803-8C42-87F74311D8DA; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <97A9E80E-15D2-48BA-AD6A-B580157BECAE@dataix.net> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11A501) From: Jason Hellenthal Subject: Re: cause of reboot Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:08:27 -0400 To: =?utf-8?Q?Emre_=C3=87amalan?= Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD quest X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:08:33 -0000 --Apple-Mail-3B45B3E8-58A5-4803-8C42-87F74311D8DA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Also . . . grep -ri . . .=20 On Sep 30, 2013, at 11:06, Jason Hellenthal wrote: And /etc/ ? And /var/cron ? On Sep 30, 2013, at 11:00, Emre =C3=87amalan wrote: Yes I checked also it , such as ; "grep -i 'reboot' /root/scripts/* -R" "grep -i 'halt' /root/scripts/* -R" "grep -i 'shutdown' /root/scripts/* -R" 30.09.2013, 17:33, "Jason Hellenthal" : > Did you check for the command reboot in all of the periodic scripts and cr= on jobs as well as the command shutdown ? >=20 > On Sep 30, 2013, at 10:24, Emre =C3=87amalan wrote: >=20 > Hi, > my server reboots every night and same o'clock last 10 days. But this mach= ine's uptime was 96days. >=20 > Suddenly reboot this machine and now this continue every night again and a= gain. >=20 > I didn't find any reason and I didn't change anything else. >=20 > I looked "last" command, > reboot ~ ~ AM 03.15 ~ >=20 > I checked "dmesg -a" , it has only generic things no other things. >=20 > I checked "/var/log/messages" >=20 > I wrote script and checked swapinfo , cpu and memory but all of them was n= ormal before reboot. >=20 > I checked crontab and scripts. >=20 > I checked "crashinfo" but no dump from kernel. >=20 > I didn't find any useful info from this commands. >=20 > I checked "praudit /var/audir/20130930..CrashRecovery" > and I didn't understand very well from this file but I think this means my= machine crash and reboot isn't it?? >=20 > And How can I understand what is the reason of rebooting my FreeBSD8.3 ser= ver. >=20 > Please help I need to find cause of reboot.. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"= --Apple-Mail-3B45B3E8-58A5-4803-8C42-87F74311D8DA Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIUOTCCBjAw ggUYoAMCAQICAwaijjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFADCBjDELMAkGA1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0 YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKzApBgNVBAsTIlNlY3VyZSBEaWdpdGFsIENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNpZ25pbmcx ODA2BgNVBAMTL1N0YXJ0Q29tIENsYXNzIDEgUHJpbWFyeSBJbnRlcm1lZGlhdGUgQ2xpZW50IENB MB4XDTEzMDUxODA4NTA0OFoXDTE0MDUxOTIyMDk0N1owSDEfMB0GA1UEAwwWamhlbGxlbnRoYWxA ZGF0YWl4Lm5ldDElMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYWamhlbGxlbnRoYWxAZGF0YWl4Lm5ldDCCASIwDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBALgnYFS1bWZr3KhKBzWAdRwrY+En+RRV8nCaYubqrMG+ YJbuenaIKSbIuFiDWipW4RHYTpE28pKaSnaVTG9WtAZvsWj0gYN9g2fYCnCOUceES2Yvi3RavxpB hsuzKIfsHb8iNNSEuczLu6gn4mQyaHwE4x6xSUKmbK8njR+YoF522F60wjsnq5dlOJdTrhDfObE5 5P23279WbRp8azgZX1VRB66wdKRDuSI1vBts4Nsha2paXd6HUUduHrPACBQREJTGXN8XtEKVwo63 aKUhRgtUwHNEuSWck/xwVl7PBUWH2dORAWTCqHjNuCKNOQ1/0LMiyMj7FdsBjN4dgL4YZpsCAwEA AaOCAtwwggLYMAkGA1UdEwQCMAAwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgSwMB0GA1UdJQQWMBQGCCsGAQUFBwMCBggr BgEFBQcDBDAdBgNVHQ4EFgQU29qUrmZtgQ7ZVoDKogfpJOSfk+YwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUU3Ltkpzg 2ssBXHx+ljVO8tS4UYIwIQYDVR0RBBowGIEWamhlbGxlbnRoYWxAZGF0YWl4Lm5ldDCCAUwGA1Ud IASCAUMwggE/MIIBOwYLKwYBBAGBtTcBAgMwggEqMC4GCCsGAQUFBwIBFiJodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0 YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9wb2xpY3kucGRmMIH3BggrBgEFBQcCAjCB6jAnFiBTdGFydENvbSBDZXJ0aWZp Y2F0aW9uIEF1dGhvcml0eTADAgEBGoG+VGhpcyBjZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSB3YXMgaXNzdWVkIGFjY29y ZGluZyB0byB0aGUgQ2xhc3MgMSBWYWxpZGF0aW9uIHJlcXVpcmVtZW50cyBvZiB0aGUgU3RhcnRD b20gQ0EgcG9saWN5LCByZWxpYW5jZSBvbmx5IGZvciB0aGUgaW50ZW5kZWQgcHVycG9zZSBpbiBj b21wbGlhbmNlIG9mIHRoZSByZWx5aW5nIHBhcnR5IG9ibGlnYXRpb25zLjA2BgNVHR8ELzAtMCug KaAnhiVodHRwOi8vY3JsLnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9jcnR1MS1jcmwuY3JsMIGOBggrBgEFBQcBAQSB gTB/MDkGCCsGAQUFBzABhi1odHRwOi8vb2NzcC5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vc3ViL2NsYXNzMS9jbGll bnQvY2EwQgYIKwYBBQUHMAKGNmh0dHA6Ly9haWEuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL2NlcnRzL3N1Yi5jbGFz czEuY2xpZW50LmNhLmNydDAjBgNVHRIEHDAahhhodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS8wDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQELBQADggEBAHsw8/Hw07gsNTKYnld74NBFtHnQOPkXYuccWx3j0PGQe9nqNxeingBf 2yvx+xBQzBoi4J1u84Jbrbe8Ii3+LLD/QMW9cN0SBIgRStPQLVee4STdjeabGmpXQa7omC02wYYO 83qh6CgJEIbmrsBSZH8ZSVrjkC4UmZS8wAQMS3qTWAPF0ZQGWx2+Gks2fXuacyt2LpNR+p9ogjAZ 1/rmUKjNhQZLswytaLRUdwAwSfQ3+TNs68h6Kv1LC3bNGBT3NEtr2q/nzzb5MzuFcDE6f9exroAC 4BHmokAprhna/vZdb6BrPjpXgRAlWAh3wEMxw75M9S/Nbzj/jNp+I+lvUJYwggY0MIIEHKADAgEC AgEeMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMH0xCzAJBgNVBAYTAklMMRYwFAYDVQQKEw1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQu MSswKQYDVQQLEyJTZWN1cmUgRGlnaXRhbCBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTaWduaW5nMSkwJwYDVQQDEyBT dGFydENvbSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1dGhvcml0eTAeFw0wNzEwMjQyMTAxNTVaFw0xNzEwMjQy MTAxNTVaMIGMMQswCQYDVQQGEwJJTDEWMBQGA1UEChMNU3RhcnRDb20gTHRkLjErMCkGA1UECxMi U2VjdXJlIERpZ2l0YWwgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2lnbmluZzE4MDYGA1UEAxMvU3RhcnRDb20gQ2xh c3MgMSBQcmltYXJ5IEludGVybWVkaWF0ZSBDbGllbnQgQ0EwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IB DwAwggEKAoIBAQDHCYPMzi3YGrEppC4Tq5a+ijKDjKaIQZZVR63UbxIP6uq/I0fhCu+cQhoUfE6E RKKnu8zPf1Jwuk0tsvVCk6U9b+0UjM0dLep3ZdE1gblK/1FwYT5Pipsu2yOMluLqwvsuz9/9f1+1 PKHG/FaR/wpbfuIqu54qzHDYeqiUfsYzoVflR80DAC7hmJ+SmZnNTWyUGHJbBpA8Q89lGxahNvur yGaC/o2/ceD2uYDX9U8Eg5DpIpGQdcbQeGarV04WgAUjjXX5r/2dabmtxWMZwhZna//jdiSyrrSM TGKkDiXm6/3/4ebfeZuCYKzN2P8O2F/Xe2AC/Y7zeEsnR7FOp+uXAgMBAAGjggGtMIIBqTAPBgNV HRMBAf8EBTADAQH/MA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIBBjAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUU3Ltkpzg2ssBXHx+ljVO8tS4 UYIwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUTgvvGqRAW6UXaYcwyjRoQ9BBrvIwZgYIKwYBBQUHAQEEWjBYMCcGCCsG AQUFBzABhhtodHRwOi8vb2NzcC5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vY2EwLQYIKwYBBQUHMAKGIWh0dHA6Ly93 d3cuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL3Nmc2NhLmNydDBbBgNVHR8EVDBSMCegJaAjhiFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0 YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9zZnNjYS5jcmwwJ6AloCOGIWh0dHA6Ly9jcmwuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL3Nmc2Nh LmNybDCBgAYDVR0gBHkwdzB1BgsrBgEEAYG1NwECATBmMC4GCCsGAQUFBwIBFiJodHRwOi8vd3d3 LnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9wb2xpY3kucGRmMDQGCCsGAQUFBwIBFihodHRwOi8vd3d3LnN0YXJ0c3Ns LmNvbS9pbnRlcm1lZGlhdGUucGRmMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4ICAQAKgwh9eKssBly4Y4xerhy5 I3dNoXHYfYa8PlVLL/qtXnkFgdtY1o95CfegFJTwqBBmf8pyTUnFsukDFUI22zF5bVHzuJ+GxhnS qN2sD1qetbYwBYK2iyYA5Pg7Er1A+hKMIzEzcduRkIMmCeUTyMyikfbUFvIBivtvkR8ZFAk22BZy +pJfAoedO61HTz4qSfQoCRcLN5A0t4DkuVhTMXIzuQ8CnykhExD6x4e6ebIbrjZLb7L+ocR0y4Yj Cl/Pd4MXU91y0vTipgr/O75CDUHDRHCCKBVmz/Rzkc/b970MEeHt5LC3NiWTgBSvrLEuVzBKM586 YoRD9Dy3OHQgWI270g+5MYA8GfgI/EPT5G7xPbCDz+zjdH89PeR3U4So4lSXur6H6vp+m9TQXPF3 a0LwZrp8MQ+Z77U1uL7TelWO5lApsbAonrqASfTpaprFVkL4nyGH+NHST2ZJPWIBk81i6Vw0ny0q ZW2Niy/QvVNKbb43A43ny076khXO7cNbBIRdJ/6qQNq9Bqb5C0Q5nEsFcj75oxQRqlKf6TcvGbjx kJh8BYtv9ePsXklAxtm8J7GCUBthHSQgepbkOexhJ0wP8imUkyiPHQ0GvEnd83129fZjoEhdGwXV 27ioRKbj/cIq7JRXun0NbeY+UdMYu9jGfIpDLtUUGSgsg2zMGs5R4jCCB8kwggWxoAMCAQICAQEw DQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwfTELMAkGA1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKzAp BgNVBAsTIlNlY3VyZSBEaWdpdGFsIENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNpZ25pbmcxKTAnBgNVBAMTIFN0YXJ0 Q29tIENlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gQXV0aG9yaXR5MB4XDTA2MDkxNzE5NDYzNloXDTM2MDkxNzE5NDYz NlowfTELMAkGA1UEBhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKzApBgNVBAsTIlNlY3Vy ZSBEaWdpdGFsIENlcnRpZmljYXRlIFNpZ25pbmcxKTAnBgNVBAMTIFN0YXJ0Q29tIENlcnRpZmlj YXRpb24gQXV0aG9yaXR5MIICIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAg8AMIICCgKCAgEAwYjbCbxsRnx4 n5V7tTOQ8nJi1sE2ICIkXs7pd/JDCqIGZKTMjjb4OOYj8G5tsTzdcqOFHKHTPbQzK9Mvr/7qsEFZ Z7bEBn0KnnSF1nlMgDd63zkFUln39BtGQ6TShYXSw3HzdWI0uiyKfx6P7u000BHHls1SPboz1t1N 3gs7SkufwiYv+rUWHHI1d8o8XebK4SaLGjZ2XAHbdBQl/u21oIgP3XjKLR8HlzABLXJ5+kbWEyqo uaarg0kd5fLv3eQBjhgKj2NTFoViqQ4ZOsy1ZqbCa3QH5Cvhdj60bdj2ROFzYh87xL6gU1YlbFEJ 96qryr92/W2b853bvz1mvAxWqq+YSJU6S9+nWFDZOHWpW+pDDAL/mevobE1wWyllnN2qXcyvATHs DOvSjejqnHvmbvcnZgwaSNduQuM/3iE+e+ENcPtjqqhsGlS0XCV6yaLJixamuyx+F14FTVhuEh0B 7hIQDcYyfxj//PT6zW6R6DZJvhpIaYvClk0aErJpF8EKkNb6eSJIv7p7afhwx/p6N9jYDdJ2T1f/ kLfjkdLd78Jgt2c63f6qnPDUi39yIs7Gn5e2+K+KoBCo2fsYxra1XFI8ibYZKnMBCg8DsxJg8nov gdujbv8mMJf1i92JV7atPbOvK8W3dgLwpdYrmoYUKnL24zOMXQlLE9+7jHQTUksCAwEAAaOCAlIw ggJOMAwGA1UdEwQFMAMBAf8wCwYDVR0PBAQDAgGuMB0GA1UdDgQWBBROC+8apEBbpRdphzDKNGhD 0EGu8jBkBgNVHR8EXTBbMCygKqAohiZodHRwOi8vY2VydC5zdGFydGNvbS5vcmcvc2ZzY2EtY3Js LmNybDAroCmgJ4YlaHR0cDovL2NybC5zdGFydGNvbS5vcmcvc2ZzY2EtY3JsLmNybDCCAV0GA1Ud IASCAVQwggFQMIIBTAYLKwYBBAGBtTcBAQEwggE7MC8GCCsGAQUFBwIBFiNodHRwOi8vY2VydC5z dGFydGNvbS5vcmcvcG9saWN5LnBkZjA1BggrBgEFBQcCARYpaHR0cDovL2NlcnQuc3RhcnRjb20u b3JnL2ludGVybWVkaWF0ZS5wZGYwgdAGCCsGAQUFBwICMIHDMCcWIFN0YXJ0IENvbW1lcmNpYWwg KFN0YXJ0Q29tKSBMdGQuMAMCAQEagZdMaW1pdGVkIExpYWJpbGl0eSwgcmVhZCB0aGUgc2VjdGlv biAqTGVnYWwgTGltaXRhdGlvbnMqIG9mIHRoZSBTdGFydENvbSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1dGhv cml0eSBQb2xpY3kgYXZhaWxhYmxlIGF0IGh0dHA6Ly9jZXJ0LnN0YXJ0Y29tLm9yZy9wb2xpY3ku cGRmMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIABzA4BglghkgBhvhCAQ0EKxYpU3RhcnRDb20gRnJlZSBTU0wg Q2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggIBABZsmfRmDDT10IVefQrs 2hBOOBxe36YlBUuRMsHoO/E93UQJWwdJiinLZgK3sZr3JZgJPI4b4d02hytLu2jTOWY9oCbH8jmR HVGrgnt+1c5a5OIDV3Bplwj5XlimCt+MBppFFhY4Cl5X9mLHegIF5rwetfKe9Kkpg/iyFONuKIdE w5Aa3jipPKxDTWRFzt0oqVzyc3sE+Bfoq7HzLlxkbnMxOhK4vLMR5H2PgVGaO42J9E2TZns8A+3T mh2a82VQ9aDQdZ8vr/DqgkOY+GmciXnEQ45GcuNkNhKv9yUeOImQd37Da2q5w8tES6x4kIvnxywe SxFEyDRSJ80KXZ+FwYnVGnjylRBTMt2AhGZ12bVoKPthLr6EqDjAmRKGpR5nZK0GLi+pcIXHlg98 iWX1jkNUDqvdpYA5lGDANMmWcCyjEvUfSHu9HH5rt52Q9CI7rvj8Ksr6glKg769LVZPrwbXwIous NE4mIgShhyx1SrflfRPXuAxkwDbSyS+GEowjCcEbgjtzSaNqV4eU5dZ4xZlDY+NN4Hct4WWZcmkE GkcJ5g8BViT7H78OealYLrnECQF+lbptAAY+supKEDnY0Cv1v+x1v5cCxQkbCNxVN+KB+zeEQ2Ig yudWS2Xq/mzBJJMkoTTrBf+aIq6bfT/xZVEKpjBqs/SIHIAN/HKK6INeMYIDbzCCA2sCAQEwgZQw gYwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAklMMRYwFAYDVQQKEw1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQuMSswKQYDVQQLEyJTZWN1cmUg RGlnaXRhbCBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTaWduaW5nMTgwNgYDVQQDEy9TdGFydENvbSBDbGFzcyAxIFBy aW1hcnkgSW50ZXJtZWRpYXRlIENsaWVudCBDQQIDBqKOMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggGvMBgGCSqGSIb3 DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTEzMDkzMDE1MDgyOVowIwYJKoZIhvcN AQkEMRYEFH0ZwBpowASh3cbnboW3IamkrnoTMIGlBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgZcwgZQwgYwxCzAJBgNV BAYTAklMMRYwFAYDVQQKEw1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQuMSswKQYDVQQLEyJTZWN1cmUgRGlnaXRhbCBD ZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTaWduaW5nMTgwNgYDVQQDEy9TdGFydENvbSBDbGFzcyAxIFByaW1hcnkgSW50 ZXJtZWRpYXRlIENsaWVudCBDQQIDBqKOMIGnBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzGBl6CBlDCBjDELMAkGA1UE BhMCSUwxFjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKzApBgNVBAsTIlNlY3VyZSBEaWdpdGFsIENl cnRpZmljYXRlIFNpZ25pbmcxODA2BgNVBAMTL1N0YXJ0Q29tIENsYXNzIDEgUHJpbWFyeSBJbnRl cm1lZGlhdGUgQ2xpZW50IENBAgMGoo4wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEggEAecFaCZoPZuN2DbzYRJgW e4NSiNi2/xLkurtMVcp1eGuE1CgL6qBrs75T/USdnb4E9F395GxeEHqrFJPgCE+QW/JcLQI+SJkG +l5C+vX2FpY3MkjPKHV48OWmxuUxrmlm7llvlVec3OeERaSqIl2S3V6JfghPZdnJMHz1EtNYQ3Uu ZqMT2rvncIjArSOTNQx6FECQcoFsuNq7aWzGEfHd398r1DneQgaoxRajQo1I5UjheJaXawWl6Ss+ qSJ6vgqZuZ5ZwkkL+rL0DP0rdUVnluAbBSJ00zrGvCuBH588XSy/iRRFfiC4dn25hFxKa3V7nKBc 5zPwtkjETUYzrnBJTgAAAAAAAA== --Apple-Mail-3B45B3E8-58A5-4803-8C42-87F74311D8DA-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 15:29:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C35C4F0; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:29:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 067532F92; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jre-mbp.elischer.org (ppp121-45-245-177.lns20.per2.internode.on.net [121.45.245.177]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r8UFSt1o050498 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:28:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <524998B1.60706@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 23:28:49 +0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Hellenthal Subject: Re: cause of reboot References: <519911380551058@web20j.yandex.ru> <96AD54CD-4EA8-46A4-A0C1-36B7E6F0B52E@dataix.net> <80361380553221@web8g.yandex.ru> <21CB70DD-F2F1-43F4-9730-FB12C46317B0@dataix.net> <97A9E80E-15D2-48BA-AD6A-B580157BECAE@dataix.net> In-Reply-To: <97A9E80E-15D2-48BA-AD6A-B580157BECAE@dataix.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" , =?UTF-8?B?RW1yZSDDh2FtYWxhbg==?= , FreeBSD quest X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:29:10 -0000 On 9/30/13 11:08 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > Also . . . grep -ri . . . > > > > On Sep 30, 2013, at 11:06, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > And /etc/ ? > And /var/cron ? > > > > On Sep 30, 2013, at 11:00, Emre Çamalan wrote: > > Yes I checked also it , such as ; > "grep -i 'reboot' /root/scripts/* -R" > "grep -i 'halt' /root/scripts/* -R" > "grep -i 'shutdown' /root/scripts/* -R" > > > 30.09.2013, 17:33, "Jason Hellenthal" : >> Did you check for the command reboot in all of the periodic scripts and cron jobs as well as the command shutdown ? >> >> On Sep 30, 2013, at 10:24, Emre Çamalan wrote: >> >> Hi, >> my server reboots every night and same o'clock last 10 days. But this machine's uptime was 96days. >> >> Suddenly reboot this machine and now this continue every night again and again. >> >> I didn't find any reason and I didn't change anything else. >> >> I looked "last" command, >> reboot ~ ~ AM 03.15 ~ >> >> I checked "dmesg -a" , it has only generic things no other things. >> >> I checked "/var/log/messages" >> >> I wrote script and checked swapinfo , cpu and memory but all of them was normal before reboot. >> >> I checked crontab and scripts. >> >> I checked "crashinfo" but no dump from kernel. >> >> I didn't find any useful info from this commands. >> >> I checked "praudit /var/audir/20130930..CrashRecovery" >> and I didn't understand very well from this file but I think this means my machine crash and reboot isn't it?? >> >> And How can I understand what is the reason of rebooting my FreeBSD8.3 server. >> >> Please help I need to find cause of reboot.. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Firstly, does this machine have the kernel debugger installed? if not then a kernel page fault will look like a reboot. if you know when this is going to occur, then I suggest that you set up some logging of every new process run, to a second machine, or possibly you might just ssh int the machine and leave 'top' running when it reboots you shoud get a snapshot of what's going on. you could just rename 'reboot' and see if it still happens. If not, then replace reboot (and friends) with a script that reports who called it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 17:09:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8AB6831; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:09:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [94.23.254.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9076825E3; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from roxette.lamaiziere.net (149.169.100.84.rev.sfr.net [84.100.169.149]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F2DB9A68D; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:09:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by roxette.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BCD6B58C; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:09:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:09:44 +0200 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: Emre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C7amalan?= Subject: Re: cause of reboot Message-ID: <20130930190944.281aa46d@davenulle.org> In-Reply-To: <519911380551058@web20j.yandex.ru> References: <519911380551058@web20j.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (smtp.lamaiziere.net); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:09:46 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD quest X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:09:53 -0000 Le Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:24:18 +0300, Emre Çamalan a écrit : > Hi, > my server reboots every night and same o'clock last 10 days. But this > machine's uptime was 96days. > > Suddenly reboot this machine and now this continue every night again > and again. > > I didn't find any reason and I didn't change anything else. > > I looked "last" command, > reboot ~ ~ AM 03.15 ~ The last time It happened (one month ago) to me it was the hard disk (periodic scripts read a large part of the disk). If the disk is smart capable try a full test with smartctl (sysutils/smartmontools) HTH, regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 18:31:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B1817F for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:31:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1207D2BA3 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:31:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VQiFo-0005jX-Tc for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:31:32 +0200 Received: from pool-173-79-84-117.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.84.117]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:31:32 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-84-117.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:31:32 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Subject: Re: cause of reboot Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:31:19 -0400 Lines: 47 Message-ID: References: <519911380551058@web20j.yandex.ru> <20130930190944.281aa46d@davenulle.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-84-117.washdc.fios.verizon.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:31:41 -0000 Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: [snip] >> >> I looked "last" command, >> reboot ~ ~ AM 03.15 ~ > > The last time It happened (one month ago) to me it was the hard disk > (periodic scripts read a large part of the disk). > > If the disk is smart capable try a full test with smartctl > (sysutils/smartmontools) My gateway/firewall/mail/ids router box at home has 2 GB RAM in it, so normally it has enough extra room that nothing ever pushes over into swap with one exception: the periodic run at 0300. It is generally never more than just a few kilobytes, but I find it slightly surprising nonetheless. If a sector (or more) on the drive that is backing the swap partition has gone bad it might not even be noticeable until something pages out to swap (like my 0300 periodic run). If the drive is a WD the 'Quick' test using the manufacturers' wddiags utility should spot it, and is non-destructive. I have occasionally seen the full test not destroy data - but I wouldn't count on it being non- destructive. However, as long as the remap area isn't full the long test will repair the drive by relocating and mapping out the bad spot. When this silent fading away of magnetic media occurs wrt to higher-end RAID controllers the scrub function in the controller BIOS is where you would want to go. The other problem relative to this that I've run into is the apple before the cart syndrome around backups. I have seen dump fail to allow for backing up data prior to using the full wddiags to repair a drive so you kinda get stuck. If the full test is going to wipe the drive and you can't generate a fresh current backup you're stuck only being able to restore whatever is the last good backup you have on hand. Wouldn't surpise me at all if this were to turn out to be the drive just recently grew one or more bad spots. A bad spot or few on an old drive that gets repaired I might continue to use the drive for a while, maybe even for like a year time-frame wise. If 2 months later it starts growing more bad spots the drive goes in the rubbish bin. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 18:54:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C97BCB for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:54:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x22b.google.com (mail-ie0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74A4A2D04 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:54:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id at1so11410506iec.30 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:54:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cyFh8Sw6Za1VFDH/zJEnKz5uGYTm0p0DcGNvcdV/k6g=; b=QRNqsY1YeCYwfZsDNFKglUOVfMp5JBEWM/8ki0Koemj7TIC7tWupjx1jpEm/Z1TyXC 5zH0TCg4TPj+OSmBa5c/s3cWUWLyJpyUwM5LjvXKcXbt5NVMOcW4/f7VTo0Zlz2plYgZ 9u28zRL5NstUN8AX9wCwFGULBCM91qZ9+0QtQIbbMoBwnOs2WvE8TlwZwHTLyVpf330R HPt/fzjvia36EtuR9Bp3ssS0bgpqLHCTV9DUIOtB62O8f7W34FIiEsO1JoduPEh7Qsna rzafX4qnio+h8QGfikuZ4TsWB//4BO3rV2BL2j9x7nlyIf563YX+nLkTJeQGNdxkySlY +/+w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.132.68 with SMTP id os4mr14925368igb.55.1380567296861; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:54:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.138.162 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:54:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:54:56 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: CAM / FC Security features From: Outback Dingo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:54:57 -0000 what, if any security features are capable using cam and ctladm for fiber channel targets ?? I dont see alot of documentation on it, and it appears a lun appears on all available WWPNs... is this correct From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 19:01:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337EBFE5; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:01:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from mail.lariat.net (mail.lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45EB2D6D; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Toshi.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA28515; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:01:30 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <201309301901.NAA28515@mail.lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:01:26 -0600 To: questions@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass Subject: FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE stability? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:01:39 -0000 How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The improvements are welcome, but there have been a few troubling messages about kernel panics and VM issues on the various mailing lists. It's never clear until the release drops whether these are actual problems with the software or hardware defects in individual systems, so I am eager to hear how the new release is working for everyone. --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 19:50:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB4A5395 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:50:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@staticsafe.ca) Received: from uriel.asininetech.com (uriel.asininetech.com [142.4.209.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F7FD2076 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:50:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by uriel.asininetech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF2DE0A83 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:50:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from uriel.asininetech.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (uriel.asininetech.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id li1CBrqwz8cz for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:50:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1d:96b:16da:e9ff:fe0e:a291] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1d:96b:16da:e9ff:fe0e:a291]) by uriel.asininetech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA322E04C8 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:50:32 -0400 (EDT) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.6.8 uriel.asininetech.com EA322E04C8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=staticsafe.ca; s=2013; t=1380570633; bh=lgN+cFuxUYQbHFskj4fcJcmczaqQnEL0ZDt+exBVWiM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=P33cYWC5bHUJIaErGAGBk4bHoKgAry2SJXha19i8uMxHEdUf2iUHB+r9lWJliL0r0 ZTshDBb6P2rvNCdk7OAAdvtHwXl3bhaVolMyMbb6iM3uRXt8X7loj6OAHoyNsnm3hp O1Xi1a5v5xJ+CLk6CdX0RwK5kO9ax7qZYcL5oKi4= Message-ID: <5249D603.2070204@staticsafe.ca> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:50:27 -0400 From: staticsafe User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE stability? References: <201309301901.NAA28515@mail.lariat.net> In-Reply-To: <201309301901.NAA28515@mail.lariat.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:50:35 -0000 On 9/30/2013 15:01, Brett Glass wrote: > How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The improvements > are welcome, but there have been a few troubling messages about kernel > panics and VM issues on the various mailing lists. It's never clear > until the release drops whether these are actual problems with the > software or hardware defects in individual systems, so I am eager to > hear how the new release is working for everyone. > > --Brett Glass Just upgraded a system running in KVM, working like a charm. -- staticsafe O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org Please don't top post. It is not logical. Please don't CC me! I'm subscribed to whatever list I just posted on. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 20:08:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C0EBBE for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:08:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qe0-x22e.google.com (mail-qe0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D151215C for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f46.google.com with SMTP id x7so4177831qeu.19 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:08:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date :to:mime-version; bh=HDxRFZ/dk3arTxhL5H1AzxQvacognKxAz+I4gTrdrUU=; b=Tx3pJpDBW0vw3u8Yrz+Ju0EvR1lfD7/Jz6bdN3TcENbUIaCgNViHJqr4UVJfxi+ot7 jpHUDK9N+5CYRoUAaYJ4MFPjey8RIxOzmu0WJKFQwvu2RbUFlK0jbnd15l3Hu2ArNXGC 6xc/dCGBDtdtJ4kdhZ3zbQHH11vUJEHT1IyaZQ/DBXucr1phVoOwb38XlAHXKaGgiSds BNPakcR7Oat+bupHp79YiLV6loZ6iauA8bACFwDTXN2xFT8LRfVQvQPBIF28JWNCJxxl s4/z1Okm0N+xO/0XY1/SGVxBTVMMUKZXX+/ZXYykCylvTphp+vWN6ESevoiuHJPrRJzP 671w== X-Received: by 10.49.134.102 with SMTP id pj6mr31461150qeb.49.1380571717234; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:08:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.254] (pool-71-241-132-193.burl.east.myfairpoint.net. [71.241.132.193]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i4sm5194572qan.0.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:08:36 -0700 (PDT) From: ajtiM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: 9.2 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:08:34 -0400 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:08:38 -0000 Hi! I have to used FreeBSD 10.0-ALPHA1 for a while but it was to difficult = for me. I run FreeBSD on iMac 11,1 which has: Chipset Model: ATI Radeon HD 4850 Type: GPU Bus: PCIe PCIe Lane Width: x16 VRAM (Total): 512 MB Vendor: ATI (0x1002) Device ID: 0x944a Revision ID: 0x0000 ROM Revision: 113-B9110C-425 EFI Driver Version: 01.00.383 Displays: iMac: Display Type: LCD Resolution: 2560 x 1440 Pixel Depth: 32-Bit Color (ARGB8888) Main Display: Yes Mirror: Off Online: Yes Built-In: Yes Connection Type: DisplayPort On FreeBSD 10.0-ALPHA1 it worked very good but for me 3D is not = important. I installed FreeBSD 9.2 one hour ago without problem and run = "portsnap fetch extrac"t and I like to install Xorg and KDE. Do I need = to have in make.conf "with_new_xorg=3Dyes", please? Does xorg t need = hal?. Does anyone has Radeon 4850 GPU type, please and it works? I had problems with sound settings on CURRENT and I note that will be = better now. Thank you very much. Mitja ---- http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 20:26:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8B19B5 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:26:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pascal@lechindianer.de) Received: from scummserver.lechindianer.de (scummserver.lechindianer.de [83.169.44.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC78122BE for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:26:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.46] (dslb-084-057-053-036.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.57.53.36]) by scummserver.lechindianer.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 358521DB801D for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 22:26:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5249DE2D.6020300@lechindianer.de> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 22:25:17 +0200 From: Pascal Schmid User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Contributing to FreeBSD References: <20130930083034.7d5bf2ff@scorpio> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:26:38 -0000 On 09/30/2013 04:30 PM, karan garg wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Jerry wrote: > >> On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:16:54 +0530 >> karan garg articulated: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I am an open source enthusiast and new to freeBSD community. I am an >>> RHCE and have a reasonable knowledge of linux administration, >>> database, Bash Scripting, and C/C++. >>> >>> I want to contribute to the community. I have gone through the FreeBSD >>> handbook, and list of various projects under the community. However, >>> I was unable to determine a suitable project for me to get started. >>> So, I would really appreciate if you could help me find a project >>> that would require my field of knowledge. >>> >>> Also, I wish to apply for GSOC-2014 and have checked the ideas page >>> but found the similar problems as above. >>> >>> Also, if you could give me a link of resources and handbook for me to >>> go through before starting to contribute. >> >> Well, if you really want a suggestion, you could try updating the >> "linux_base-f10-10_7" port that was released by Fedora on November 25, >> 2008 to something newer, say the Fedora 19, released July 2, 2013. >> >> Thanks Jerry, > But as this is my first experience, can you give me some links to go > through before I start? > According to what I found, portsnap is one of the tools that will help me > for this. > > Also, is this the correct mailing list to keep posting on for this purpose? > >> -- >> Jerry â™” >> >> Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. >> Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. >> __________________________________________________________________ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > Hi Karan, you should take a look at the FreeBSD porter's handbook http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/ and I think questions@ is the general purpose mailing list for all things :) If your uncertain about some options in your first port I'm sure the friendly people over at ports@ will help you! Greetings, Pascal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 20:49:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010E0871; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:49:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [94.23.254.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3BC2459; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:49:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from roxette.lamaiziere.net (149.169.100.84.rev.sfr.net [84.100.169.149]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 219F2A706; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 22:49:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by roxette.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5449922A7; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 22:49:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 22:49:40 +0200 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: Brett Glass Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE stability? Message-ID: <20130930224940.40b1e404@davenulle.org> In-Reply-To: <201309301901.NAA28515@mail.lariat.net> References: <201309301901.NAA28515@mail.lariat.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (smtp.lamaiziere.net); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 22:49:42 +0200 (CEST) Cc: stable@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:49:44 -0000 Le Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:01:26 -0600, Brett Glass a écrit : Hello, > How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The > improvements are welcome, but there have been a few troubling > messages about kernel panics and VM issues on the various mailing > lists. It's never clear until the release drops whether these are > actual problems with the software or hardware defects in individual > systems, so I am eager to hear how the new release is working for > everyone. I've seen two problems if you use poudriere (on ZFS only?) which occur in some loads (ie desktop running gvfsd). One fix is in 9-STABLE and the other one should be mfced soon. May be there will be an errata for 9.2-RELEASE for this ? I think that would be nice because 9.2 is stable as a Windows 3.11 with my load :-) Regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 21:17:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134E7757 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:17:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9A7F264B for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id r8ULHU8Q004886 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:17:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Message-ID: <5249EA6A.9090605@blackfoot.net> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:17:30 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: after pkgng update, daily run still using pkg_info Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:17:31 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:17:33 -0000 > On 09/30/13 07:15, Mathew Seaman wrote: >>>> On 09/28/13 10:52, Gary Aitken wrote: >>>> After switching to pkgng, I >>>> noticed that my daily run output constantly complains about the >>>> installed packages being corrupt, e.g.: "pkg_info: the package >>>> info for package 'asciidoc-8.6.8_1' is corrupt" >>>> >>>> The problem is with etc/periodic/daily/490.status-pkg-changes >>>> which is still using "pkg_info" instead of "pkg info" >>>> >>>> Was this script supposed to be automatically updated as part of >>>> the conversion? What's the "right" way to upgrade this on a 9.1 >>>> release system? Or should I just edit the script by hand and be >>>> done with it? >>> >>> On 09/28/13 13:57, Mark Felder wrote: Run pkg_info. If there is >>> anything listed you have not fully converted to pkgng and have some >>> old broken/corrupt packages. You'll want to clean this up. >> >> What does "clean this up" mean, and how does one go about it, given >> the system is converted to using pkgng? There is no >> /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db >> >> Some of the packages reported as corrupt were installed *after* the >> conversion to pkgng, so why is pkg_info even noticing them? "pkg >> info" reports 705 packages installed, and installs and re-installs >> using portmaster seem to be working. "pkg_info" reports 14 "good" >> packages and 658 "corrupt" packages. If pkg_info is picking up >> packages installed after the conversion, why doesn't the sum of good >> and corrupt packages equal the number pkg reports? >> >> It was my understanding that after switching to pkgng, the pkg_* cmds >> should no longer be used. If that's the case, shouldn't the daily >> script have been modified by the upgrade process? > Yes, you're correct that the pkg_info command should no longer be used > after pkgng-ifying your system. Not because it's harmful or lead to any > sort of breakage but simply because it won't return any meaningful > information. > > Ideally, there shouldn't really be any of the old style package metadata > left in /var/db/pkg after running pkg2ng but the conversion process may > occasionaly stumble over the odd port or two. (In which case force the > port in question to re-install. If you're using a package repository, > that's 'pkg install -f pkgname' -- otherwise, just > use the normal portmaster / portupgrade command you'ld have used pre-pkgng.) thanks. I was a bit confused; the ones that need to be reinstalled are the ones which pkg_info does *not* complain about. So now the daily/490.status-pkg-changes script will complain about all of them :-) Consistency is good. > If you are a portmaster user be aware that it does store various bits to > do with managing distfiles in /var/db/pkg/pkgname-ver/ subdirectories. > These shouldn't be confused with old style pkg_install metadata -- the > distinguishing feature is if they contain a +CONTENTS file. > > As to why pkg2ng doesn't disable pkg_install related periodic jobs -- > pretty much because no one has implemented that. pkg comes with it's own > set of periodic job scripts which should give you the equivalent set of > reports via the pkg local database, so all we'd need to do is turn off > any old pkg_install script and turn on the pkg equivalent. > > I've just created a new issue on github for that: > > https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/issues/599 > > Patches -- or even better, pull requests -- are welcome. Thanks for the clarification. Bit of a delay responding because something's screwed up with my mail service. It's been a while since I converted, so I'm fuzzy on what pkg2ng actually did. However, $ which pkg /usr/sbin/pkg $ pkg info pkg pkg-1.1.4_6 $ pkg which /usr/sbin/pkg /usr/sbin/pkg was not found in the database I was trying to find the set of pkg's own periodic job scripts but I don't see them, and I'm not really sure what to look for. I tried grepping for similarly numbered "490.status" and similarly named "status-pkg-changes" and came up empty, although I see the file 490.status-pkg-changes.in in the distfile. Questions: 1. Is there some reason "pkg which" doesn't find itself? 2. Where is pkg supposed to install its "own set of periodic job scripts" and what do the names look like? 3. After reinstalling the ports reported by pkg_info as ok, one of them, x11-toolkits/wxgtk28 reinstalls fine but when done /var/db/pkg/wxgtk2-2.8.12_2 still contains "old format" files: -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 45 Aug 26 22:43 +COMMENT -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3609 Aug 26 22:43 +CONTENTS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 178 Aug 26 22:43 +DESC -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 17553 Aug 26 22:43 +MTREE_DIRS -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 137 Sep 30 13:54 distfiles Is it safe to simply delete the first four? Wasn't sure whether to file a bug on this or not, so I haven't. Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 30 21:35:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C252E1B for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:35:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com (mail-la0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0C20279E for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:35:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id ep20so4995107lab.2 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:35:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6Kbx4/KXC5NUQYuTtDmd7z0tic1/rOUsajaCzAqURLg=; b=cLen5q7MGX2o8tzI1x2ySv8UHyFbev4nL8AKpSBDgaXsdhPgfALm6SbJiiYYt4Q8Af atWNM11jNP6+Qj/MDyFA2bia1RYvLbM2NnZNuhRdrW4Z+DiH+S7ludVE5vy3p/AdnrCe 2oBxWHW5bChdyVPgcJGw8ji19PMFRyU+b3yOCW1xtQ0sZDV4wMQjRyrYBbzgJsOtGTm3 DVIv8XMv8zxsac7iBs2jJT66l0XniQTkWANbdidhlmjhAZ6ft7J0BQSxW5q2WzJGXqtn q8sIQ1hTF52bM0o5H+vrbW6Shvg1Xqwl5v10xlLb0qTOFJ86gZE1sypYydanJnY0f2Nv BpcA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.37.103 with SMTP id x7mr8681031laj.28.1380576910148; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:35:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.157.129 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:35:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:35:10 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: # portmaster -r pixman fails with !#/bin/sh list too long From: Antonio Olivares To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:35:13 -0000 Dear folks, In updating ports I encounter above issue and cannot proceed. 20130929: AFFECTS: users of x11/pixman AUTHOR: zeising@FreeBSD.org The library version of x11/pixman has changed, and portrevision has been bumped in all dependent ports. If you have external software that depends on pixman, this software needs to be recompiled. To recompile all software dependent on pixman, run: # portmaster -r pixman or # portupgrade -rf pixman The messages are that a pkg texlive-ub*.... and that #!/bin/sh list too long. I try to run # portmaster -d -r pixman -x 'texlive-*' but it still fails in the same place :( I am using texlive-freebsd from Romain Tartiere's googlecode page in case it is important. Please advice me so I can succeed to fix these issue. I lost X because I failed to read the /usr/src/UPDATING advice and then I realized that I overlooked this :( Best Regards, Antonio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 1 00:32:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316F149C for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 00:32:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E33482FBC for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 00:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VQntT-0006Jq-L6 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 02:32:51 +0200 Received: from pool-173-79-84-117.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.84.117]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 02:32:51 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-84-117.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 02:32:51 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Subject: Re: cause of reboot Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:32:39 -0400 Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <519911380551058@web20j.yandex.ru> <20130930190944.281aa46d@davenulle.org> <20131001000739.GC68360@neutralgood.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-84-117.washdc.fios.verizon.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 00:32:54 -0000 kpneal@pobox.com wrote: [snip] > While we're throwing ideas onto the table let me mention power supplies. > Power supplies and hard drives are in a race to see which one will fail > first. It may be that the power supply is marginal and added load from > the drives being hit hard may send it over the edge. How heavily loaded > is the machine in question? Absolute and total agreement with this. As they age and the filter caps leak and dry out more it will eventually become apparent. But in the meantime the output DC can just about meet spec up until really loaded. Then the ripple becomes so excessive it's not quite "DC" any longer. You can clearly see it using an oscilloscope. The 0300 AM periodic does hammer a machine enough to possibly push a marginal power supply over the edge. I once had a box where the RAM chips would "sing" with a high-pitched whistle only during the 0300 periodic run. It sounded just like the horizontal output on a television right before destruction. :-) [snip] -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 1 01:07:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95E2ACF for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 01:07:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ethan.freeservices@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-x247.google.com (mail-oa0-x247.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::247]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 978B7215E for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 01:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f71.google.com with SMTP id f4so20148552oah.2 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:07:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=p0DhDycKsbkSBAZClpc2P+Fs9yUS7o9+ytDcxZtzF68=; b=Zzk1AH5LCiISCeiTGkfzj1BSXxmbZwseJKjHsh93EuEpzx7vDYJzb6r6Rsbr477eqo xqRVXFcjeFu0kCLsCVawJIHMMjuUUGx2E9o1/0bEFiNHJKxuicBHqUp+qm7c5sgGiNID wBdV1TL89uokKFow1mlf43A1oW8fFap5MTItxWp0MPwBooE1cCb2eWsZ9xoO1mUHsw+7 Dzg9/iYgmjSmpn55Er5jffODigiHTwiBvGdSY1D14khqMFnw4bKygbMQWfo5UD24qlG4 +RDtOZPqYa1rzPCWFiQGcKtDxt1WIRFGRJ7i/5wOwuIHo/TyWHRgJtsnqWULVKvKfg1f BW2A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.114.66 with SMTP id je2mr14559671igb.5.1380589651687; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:07:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <047d7b3a8a5ac5019c04e7a39374@google.com> Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 01:07:31 +0000 Subject: Freebsd.org - Integrated marketing help From: Chloe Lee To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 01:07:32 -0000 PGRpdiBkaXI9Imx0ciI+DQoJDQoJDQoJDQoNCg0KPHAgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MGNt Ij48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBmZiIgZmFjZT0iVmVyZGFuYSwgIA0Kc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+PGI+ RnJlZWJzZC5vcmc8L2I+PC9mb250Pjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj48Zm9udCAgDQpmYWNl PSJWZXJkYW5hLCBzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj6gVGVhbSw8L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250Pjxicj48L3A+DQo8cCBz dHlsZT0ibWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTowY20iPjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj48Zm9udCBmYWNl PSJWZXJkYW5hLCAgDQpzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj48Zm9udD5JDQp0aG91Z2h0IHlvdSBtaWdodCBsaWtl IHRvIGtub3cgc29tZSByZWFzb25zIHdoeSB5b3UgYXJlIG5vdCBnZXR0aW5nDQplbm91Z2ggU29j aWFsIE1lZGlhIGFuZCBPcmdhbmljIHNlYXJjaCBlbmdpbmUgdHJhZmZpYyAgDQpmb3KgPGI+RnJl ZWJzZC5vcmcuPC9iPjwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250PjwvcD4NCjxwIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4t Ym90dG9tOjBjbSI+PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9IiMwMDAwZmYiPjxmb250IGZhY2U9IlZlcmRhbmEsICAN CnNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPjEuDQpZb3VyIHdlYnNpdGWgPGI+RnJlZWJzZC5vcmegPC9iPmlzDQpub3Qg cmFua2luZyB0b3AgaW4gR29vZ2xlIG9yZ2FuaWMgc2VhcmNoZXMgZm9yIG1hbnkgY29tcGV0aXRp dmUNCmtleXdvcmQgcGhyYXNlcy48L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250PjwvcD4NCjxwIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4t Ym90dG9tOjBjbSI+DQo8Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBmZiI+PGZvbnQgZmFjZT0iVmVyZGFuYSwg c2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+Mi4NCllvdXIgY29tcGFueSBpcyBub3QgZG9pbmcgd2VsbCBpbiBtb3N0IG9m IHRoZSBTb2NpYWwgTWVkaWEgIA0KV2Vic2l0ZXMuPC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48L3A+DQo8cCBzdHls ZT0ibWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTowY20iPg0KPGZvbnQgY29sb3I9IiMwMDAwZmYiPjxmb250IGZhY2U9 IlZlcmRhbmEsIHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPjMuDQpZb3VyIHNpdGUgaXMgbm90IHVzZXIgZnJpZW5kbHkg b24gbW9iaWxlIGRldmljZXMuPC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48L3A+DQo8cCBzdHlsZT0ibWFyZ2luLWJv dHRvbTowY20iPjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj48Zm9udCBmYWNlPSJWZXJkYW5hLCAgDQpz YW5zLXNlcmlmIj5UaGVyZQ0KYXJlIG1hbnkgYWRkaXRpb25hbCBpbXByb3ZlbWVudHMgdGhhdCBj b3VsZCBiZSBtYWRlIHRvIHlvdXIgd2Vic2l0ZSwNCmFuZCBpZiB5b3Ugd291bGQgbGlrZSB0byBs ZWFybiBhYm91dCB0aGVtLCBhbmQgYXJlIGN1cmlvdXMgdG8ga25vdw0Kd2hhdCBvdXIgd29ya2lu ZyB0b2dldGhlciB3b3VsZCBpbnZvbHZlLCB0aGVuIEkgd291bGQgYmUgZ2xhZCB0bw0KcHJvdmlk ZSB5b3Ugd2l0aCBhIGRldGFpbGVkIGFuYWx5c2lzIGluIHRoZSBmb3JtIG9mIGEgPGI+V0VCU0lU RQ0KQVVESVQgUkVQT1JUIGZvciBGUkVFPC9iPi48L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250PjwvcD4NCjxwIHN0eWxl PSJtYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjBjbSI+DQo8Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBmZiI+PGZvbnQgZmFjZT0i VmVyZGFuYSwgc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+T3VyDQpjbGllbnRzIGNvbnNpc3RlbnRseSB0ZWxsIHVzIHRo YXQgdGhlaXIgY3VzdG9tZXJzIGZpbmQgdGhlbSBiZWNhdXNlDQp0aGV5IGFyZSBhdCB0aGUgdG9w IG9mIHRoZSBHb29nbGUgc2VhcmNoIHJhbmtpbmdzLiBCZWluZyBhdCB0aGUgdG9wDQpsZWZ0IG9m IEdvb2dsZSAoIzEtICMzIG9yZ2FuaWMgcG9zaXRpb25zKSBpcyB0aGUgYmVzdCB0aGluZyB5b3Ug Y2FuDQpkbyBmb3IgeW91ciBjb21wYW55JiMzOTtzIHdlYnNpdGUgdHJhZmZpYyBhbmQgb25saW5l IHJlcHV0YXRpb24uIFlvdSB3aWxsDQpiZSBoYXBweSB0byBrbm93IHRoYXQsIG15IHRlYW0gaXMg d2lsbGluZyB0byBndWFyYW50ZWUgeW91IDE8c3VwPnN0PC9zdXA+DQpwYWdlIEdvb2dsZSByYW5r aW5nIGZvciBtb3N0IG9mIHlvdXIgdGFyZ2V0ZWQga2V5d29yZCBwaHJhc2VzIGluIG91cg0Kc2l4 IG1vbnRoIG9uZ29pbmcgY2FtcGFpZ24uPC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48L3A+DQo8cCBzdHlsZT0ibWFy Z2luLWJvdHRvbTowY20iPjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj48Zm9udCBmYWNlPSJWZXJkYW5h LCAgDQpzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj5Tb3VuZA0KaW50ZXJlc3Rpbmc/IEZlZWwgZnJlZSB0byBlbWFpbCB1 cyBvciBhbHRlcm5hdGl2ZWx5IHlvdSBjYW4gcHJvdmlkZQ0KbWUgd2l0aCB5b3VyIHBob25lIG51 bWJlciBhbmQgdGhlIGJlc3QgdGltZSB0byBjYWxsIHlvdS4gSSBhbSBhbHNvDQphdmFpbGFibGUg dG8gbWVldCB5b3UgaW4gcGVyc29uIGFuZCBwcmVzZW50IHlvdSB0aGlzIHdlYnNpdGUgYXVkaXQN CnJlcG9ydC48YnI+LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tPFdCUj4tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS08V0JSPi0tLS0tPGJyPkJlc3QNClJlZ2FyZHMsPGJyPjxiPkNo bG9lIExlZTwvYj48YnI+TWFya2V0aW5nICANCkNvbnN1bHRhbnQ8YnI+PGJyPjwvZm9udD48L2Zv bnQ+PGIgIA0Kc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OlZlcmRhbmEsc2Fucy1zZXJpZjtjb2xvcjpyZ2Io MCwwLDI1NSkiPlBTDQpJOiA8L2I+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OlZlcmRhbmEsc2Fu cy1zZXJpZjtjb2xvcjpyZ2IoMCwwLDI1NSkiPkkNCmFtIG5vdCBzcGFtbWluZy4gSSBoYXZlIHN0 dWRpZWQgeW91ciB3ZWJzaXRlIGFuZCBiZWxpZXZlIEkgY2FuIGhlbHANCndpdGggeW91ciBidXNp bmVzcyBwcm9tb3Rpb24uIElmIHlvdSBzdGlsbCB3YW50IHVzIHRvIG5vdCBjb250YWN0DQp5b3Us IHlvdSBjYW4gaWdub3JlIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgb3IgYXNrIHRvIHJlbW92ZSBhbmQgSSB3aWxsIG5v dA0KY29udGFjdCBhZ2Fpbi48L3NwYW4+PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9IiMwMDAwZmYiPjxmb250IGZhY2U9 IlZlcmRhbmEsICANCnNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPjxicj48L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250PjwvcD4NCjxwIHN0eWxl PSJtYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjBjbSI+DQo8Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBmZiI+PGZvbnQgZmFjZT0i VmVyZGFuYSwgc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+PGI+UFMNCklJPC9iPjogSSBmb3VuZCB5b3VyIHNpdGUgdXNp bmcgR29vZ2xlIHNlYXJjaCBhbmQgYWZ0ZXIgaGF2aW5nIGEgbG9vaw0Kb3ZlciB5b3VyIHdlYnNp dGUgSSByZWNvbW1lbmQgeW91IHRvIGltcGxlbWVudCBmdXR1cmUgdGVjaG5vbG9naWVzDQpzdWNo IGFzIEhUTUw1IGFuZCBSZXNwb25zaXZlIERlc2lnbiB0byBtYWtlIHlvdXIgc2l0ZSBtb3JlIGFj Y2Vzc2libGUNCmluIG1vYmlsZSBwaG9uZSwgdGFibGV0cywgZGVza3RvcCBldGMuPC9mb250Pjwv Zm9udD48L3A+PC9kaXY+DQo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 1 02:16:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACD41DE for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 02:16:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EE422430 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 02:16:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-65.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFA11277AE for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 04:16:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r912GVel002095 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 04:16:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 04:16:31 +0200 From: Polytropon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cause of reboot Message-Id: <20131001041631.4c018102.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <519911380551058@web20j.yandex.ru> <20130930190944.281aa46d@davenulle.org> <20131001000739.GC68360@neutralgood.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 02:16:46 -0000 On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:32:39 -0400, Michael Powell wrote: > kpneal@pobox.com wrote: > [snip] > > While we're throwing ideas onto the table let me mention power supplies. > > Power supplies and hard drives are in a race to see which one will fail > > first. It may be that the power supply is marginal and added load from > > the drives being hit hard may send it over the edge. How heavily loaded > > is the machine in question? > > Absolute and total agreement with this. The idea of a hardware problem looks more and more obvious here. A software configuration problem could be located by diff'ing the currently used files against "stock files", or by checking the logs of a versioning system (if you use one to track your local configuration file changes, for example in a CVS reposi- tory). It could be a matter of power (by "more than usual" drain when the machine is heavily loaded), but also a file system inconsis- tency is possible. In case the machine is using a background fsck that silently fails to deal with a specific damage, using background_fsck="NO" in /etc/rc.conf to _definitely_ bring the file systems up _clean_ prior to multi-user mode booting would probably be a good idea. Using "smartctl" to check the hard disks SMART data would make sure the disk is not dying (and the reboot is an effect of that). Monitoring the server when (or while) it reboots would surely be interesting. Maybe open some sessions to have a close look at programs like "top", "systat -v" and "mbmon" (to check for temperatures and voltages) - and when run at 1 second intervals, it should be possible to obtain a good system status diagram of the "last state" before reboot, when the connection drops. > I once had a box where the RAM chips > would "sing" with a high-pitched whistle only during the 0300 periodic run. > It sounded just like the horizontal output on a television right before > destruction. :-) I have heared something comparable from a graphics card when developing some OpenGL demo stuff. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 1 06:22:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4A9FD0 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 06:22:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michipili@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-x236.google.com (mail-ee0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 732DF215F for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 06:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id e53so3183478eek.13 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 23:22:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=l0gOPLgA5FDv/jiPCdbZJlbIUtsBEG/JOkcwdvfc1PA=; b=sZda70KKtGH/QP33wt70cUKZF94xRznjIRZ39cGM65i7S0u08MnKcS3cv8Q3Ejdf1m SmUFnnlgKcapMhBHKh40sWDaxRGCTtnaGOu4JdqV5av5yqH4F5566QNDu0lH1ItfG4yd jyiIKIjL5WI+Pd+byiyEzl1CYFSVFtSwnAIlbTbvPjgiSbrpFRFbgs1GoWf0s1i8kOrn /nxahGyRg3GsopScBDY8j1o9uPtt1EqALbogwWs8hExhVhtkoL+mMk8qNJi6WQVXByc/ vBFJDOa5zYk8IZYTP9qGHyzlyz/R/+UCziyowXxx+vwBdJ81oTbGCGfFxCLWJixBS1IQ hb0A== X-Received: by 10.15.67.131 with SMTP id u3mr43385283eex.34.1380608552807; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 23:22:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from llea.celt.neu (xdsl-89-0-185-2.netcologne.de. [89.0.185.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h45sm9351224eeg.5.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 23:22:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <524A6A26.30903@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 08:22:30 +0200 From: Michael User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/24.0 SeaMonkey/2.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Soekris for a Trac server Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 06:22:34 -0000 I am planning to move a jail-hosted service to a physical device and would like to hear the advices of experts here. My service runs sshd, apache and trac (the ticket service) and I am considering getting one of the products by soekris. I know that some list users have some experience with these products so it would be very nice for me to ear if this kind of product is suitable for my project and if FreeBSD is doing well on these platforms. Also I am bit unsure about the setup I should pick: we are a hand of users for the service and I would like to know if a 64-MB Ram and a 166Mhz setup could do, or if I definitely should consider a faster CPU or more RAM. Given my actual jail based setup, is there an easy way to guess the required RAM — In the jail `top` reports a Size of 111M for the Python process, but I guess the interpreter is taking things easy when a lot of RAM is available, doesn't it? Last, are FreeBSD jails lightweight enough to run in such a constrained environment? It is not unlikely that the device evolves to run several other services (like a nfs) and I would appreciate to be able to confine services appropriately using jails. Thank you for your comments! Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 1 06:27:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08A0140 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 06:27:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A812D2191 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 06:27:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A872933C1D; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 02:27:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 5F2AE39830; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 02:27:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Antonio Olivares Subject: Re: # portmaster -r pixman fails with !#/bin/sh list too long References: Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 02:27:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Antonio Olivares's message of "Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:35:10 -0500") Message-ID: <44d2np1p5k.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 06:27:59 -0000 Antonio Olivares writes: > Dear folks, > > In updating ports I encounter above issue and cannot proceed. > > 20130929: > AFFECTS: users of x11/pixman > AUTHOR: zeising@FreeBSD.org > > The library version of x11/pixman has changed, and portrevision has > been bumped in all dependent ports. If you have external software that > depends on pixman, this software needs to be recompiled. > To recompile all software dependent on pixman, run: > > # portmaster -r pixman > or > # portupgrade -rf pixman > > The messages are that a pkg texlive-ub*.... and that #!/bin/sh list > too long. I try to run > # portmaster -d -r pixman -x 'texlive-*' > but it still fails in the same place :( I continued with portmaster's "-R" option and got a lot further. You could try either that or the command line that portmaster suggests when it bails out. > I am using texlive-freebsd from Romain Tartiere's googlecode page in > case it is important. Please advice me so I can succeed to fix these > issue. I lost X because I failed to read the /usr/src/UPDATING advice > and then I realized that I overlooked this :( I don't think that texlive is relevant; if you continue the process instead of starting from scratch, you'll probably get farther. I'd prefer to actually debug the problem at its root, but it's the middle of the night and I don't seem to have enough brain cells awake to figure anything out. Good luck. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 1 10:04:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CED2F49 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 10:04:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karangarg31@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-x234.google.com (mail-vc0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DD222D5E for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 10:04:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ld13so4540168vcb.39 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 03:04:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=et00LW3IyjfMAYafGIDROO696PLdwlhaBhKRE9PWEvk=; b=ZO3BSG3wY07hAAfPUYLw5YHZT7r8OsmWnzURU4TvmiN4v1Z06d1OZ2wQcel7mvLzYB wru0k6BAAgXt1GlRqvZTcxnywD6xinXJPvyJoW35CEmQ/FJsfAUGsaiaJn4vYSyiYzaC PmR5vnVgE9OfKUS+S2YQXt7fW2FLvrGlTQq020lBLMe11VijJ245bMCykbJOGtnAg5Cg AZn3QBfmDjx0itIlgUJUqG3iD/72bGtBunxT9lw/fJ1o24pqWcQi86D6juNFxiPxHETw eWxRTLCES5YrsP6JOZ66CJRTwO7Jti/3Qy46K8lg/QDnqH+C50zbIMMtKd15yIg2yUhW WPRg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.237.208 with SMTP id kp16mr21134337vcb.4.1380621858543; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 03:04:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.76.225 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 03:04:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 15:34:18 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Contributing to FreeBSD From: karan garg To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 10:04:19 -0000 On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Pascal Schmid wrote= : > On 09/30/2013 04:30 PM, karan garg wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Jerry wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:16:54 +0530 > >> karan garg articulated: > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I am an open source enthusiast and new to freeBSD community. I am an > >>> RHCE and have a reasonable knowledge of linux administration, > >>> database, Bash Scripting, and C/C++. > >>> > >>> I want to contribute to the community. I have gone through the FreeBS= D > >>> handbook, and list of various projects under the community. However, > >>> I was unable to determine a suitable project for me to get started. > >>> So, I would really appreciate if you could help me find a project > >>> that would require my field of knowledge. > >>> > >>> Also, I wish to apply for GSOC-2014 and have checked the ideas page > >>> but found the similar problems as above. > >>> > >>> Also, if you could give me a link of resources and handbook for me to > >>> go through before starting to contribute. > >> > >> Well, if you really want a suggestion, you could try updating the > >> "linux_base-f10-10_7" port that was released by Fedora on November 25, > >> 2008 to something newer, say the Fedora 19, released July 2, 2013. > >> > >> Thanks Jerry, > > But as this is my first experience, can you give me some links to go > > through before I start? > > According to what I found, portsnap is one of the tools that will help = me > > for this. > > > > Also, is this the correct mailing list to keep posting on for this > purpose? > > > >> -- > >> Jerry =E2=99=94 > >> > >> Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > >> Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. > >> __________________________________________________________________ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > > > > > > > Hi Karan, > > you should take a look at the FreeBSD porter's handbook > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/ > Thanks a lot! I will go through it at once. > and I think questions@ is the general purpose mailing list for all things := ) > > If your uncertain about some options in your first port I'm sure the > friendly people over at ports@ > will help you! > Thanks! > > Greetings, > Pascal > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 Regards :) Karan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 1 12:20:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55237D92 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 12:20:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x234.google.com (mail-lb0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D60DD26B4 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 12:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id q8so5622564lbi.25 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 05:20:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=7XMueEReqDsZdgu8/bvuaW+LwfReHvQqeHPICKeEAQA=; b=lh/QvR9+WQeznm7pT7WwhhzHbaja50qA4l67ninLhhSq970vcTW1+jP+8zeVD+WxqX /kWXfGQ+VEZ69j1gtMkkt0b/eKHDaEcAQCXM5cHFj31lpbZFk7VG7MN90ST9si6JV5xN 4sLvrAaFCm29Wi9dp38OetosRgGER8R7HC8AkhDLUgHjUxOSx5d8c4drJMwu64hxww5o AX8+bLaQo+LfgKAFn2JezZEUs0dRGYDHtTk91eZWB+KOk/fvdna9y8SbL9l1rKB3Usky GkQAX8GmbVif0Ggbn0NSijNVI+7gWRBl5C3e4NGBwf9PnYxlVkrqJ1h/XqJOG2YVuwCr ytUg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.0.242 with SMTP id 18mr26372139lbh.18.1380630036736; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 05:20:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.157.129 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 05:20:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <44d2np1p5k.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <44d2np1p5k.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 07:20:36 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: # portmaster -r pixman fails with !#/bin/sh list too long From: Antonio Olivares To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Romain_Tarti=E8re?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 12:20:39 -0000 Dear Sir, I tried your advice with the -R option, it worked, but for only pixman the other ports that depend on it don't get rebuilt :( I try to use -x 'texlive-*' but it does not work :( I get Could not execute shell "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1192: warning "/usr/bin/awk '/^#define[[:blank:]]....FreeBSD_version/ {print $3} wrote: > Antonio Olivares writes: > >> Dear folks, >> >> In updating ports I encounter above issue and cannot proceed. >> >> 20130929: >> AFFECTS: users of x11/pixman >> AUTHOR: zeising@FreeBSD.org >> >> The library version of x11/pixman has changed, and portrevision has >> been bumped in all dependent ports. If you have external software that >> depends on pixman, this software needs to be recompiled. >> To recompile all software dependent on pixman, run: >> >> # portmaster -r pixman >> or >> # portupgrade -rf pixman >> >> The messages are that a pkg texlive-ub*.... and that #!/bin/sh list >> too long. I try to run >> # portmaster -d -r pixman -x 'texlive-*' >> but it still fails in the same place :( > > I continued with portmaster's "-R" option and got a lot further. You > could try either that or the command line that portmaster suggests > when it bails out. > >> I am using texlive-freebsd from Romain Tartiere's googlecode page in >> case it is important. Please advice me so I can succeed to fix these >> issue. I lost X because I failed to read the /usr/src/UPDATING advice >> and then I realized that I overlooked this :( > > I don't think that texlive is relevant; if you continue the process > instead of starting from scratch, you'll probably get farther. > > I'd prefer to actually debug the problem at its root, but it's the > middle of the night and I don't seem to have enough brain cells awake > to figure anything out. > > Good luck. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 1 13:46:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E92DA3 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 13:46:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9922C71 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 13:46:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00C633C1D; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 09:46:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id E429739830; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 09:46:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Antonio Olivares Subject: Re: # portmaster -r pixman fails with !#/bin/sh list too long References: <44d2np1p5k.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 09:46:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Antonio Olivares's message of "Tue, 1 Oct 2013 07:20:36 -0500") Message-ID: <444n9114v5.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Romain =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tarti=E8re?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 13:46:15 -0000 Antonio Olivares writes: > I tried your advice with the -R option, it worked, but for only pixman > the other ports that depend on it don't get rebuilt :( > > I try to use -x 'texlive-*' but it does not work :( > I get > > Could not execute shell > "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1192: warning "/usr/bin/awk > '/^#define[[:blank:]]....FreeBSD_version/ {print $3} > /usr/local/sbin/portmaster: rm: Argument list too long > > and it justs sits there. Out of 3 machines only 1 is working because > I overlooked the pixman update entry in /usr/src/UPDATING :( > > Please advice me as to how to get the desktop working again on these > machines. I did not want to shoot myself in the foot but I did so :( Try the '-R' again; it may get a bit farther each time. You can always recover by removing some of the ports and reinstalling them after the remaining ports are updated. You're going to have to rebuild a huge number of ports anyway, so this is not very different from using portmaster on everything. Good luck. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 1 14:03:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26D950E for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 14:03:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 776DF2DBF for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 14:03:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id D633120D9E for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 09:53:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 01 Oct 2013 09:53:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to :references; s=smtpout; bh=o/4HOBR1+y/KP5sJ221TePq+1Gc=; b=hIr4I MmLez3XtsxcLh5tAdBXDmLgy7DggGpQk+0my6jxGYBXwX2Qm20j3+thW30FFTIbp g8LIRpBFhuFiW4G+Corwi6iQswX4MwSp3SPAwxnN1HoWNvrUKy9pH2eiGy8g3gPG OgM8NfgjAozBK1mz8PnfeJsv20TTg7JFuPGp5U= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id 343AAB00005; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 09:53:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1380635626.30998.28633073.5EC751F5@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: DpwfbtXsiro+zudKX4xm2zv6z1RwUqq9F43H2WqLZ9Yy 1380635626 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-ce174988 Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE stability? Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 08:53:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201309301901.NAA28515@mail.lariat.net> References: <201309301901.NAA28515@mail.lariat.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 14:03:31 -0000 On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 14:01, Brett Glass wrote: > How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The > improvements are welcome, but there have been a few troubling > messages about kernel panics and VM issues on the various mailing > lists. It's never clear until the release drops whether these are > actual problems with the software or hardware defects in individual > systems, so I am eager to hear how the new release is working for > everyone. > I upgraded our two main backup servers which are doing I/O via rsync/rsnapshot and sending ZFS snapshots to the other remote site every 15 minutes. I had several instances where the machines went unresponsive. They didn't panic, and they did respond to CTRL+ALT+DEL on the console, but they lost all networking and wouldn't do anything else. The only change was I enabled zfs prefetch which I previously had disabled for performance reasons. It never caused this issue on 9.1 when I had it enabled, though. The fix definitely was turning off prefetch again which doesn't bother me too much, but I can't use this environment to try to help debug it as it's important production data. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 1 14:08:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBC46CA for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 14:08:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-x22a.google.com (mail-qa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D809F2E25 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 14:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id cm18so3355760qab.8 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 07:08:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=J3o9fR8pKtV8kbNlS1acqHIk9lOItOmOSl/g3XzOo3w=; b=FrsPjqPrdS4DKG8UZCy6el1NeZkpNvHtKMKUyzJpEk741R+NTG7qKz5sHe1/EXeE+X g8UjjmIBtlu0VVGaWqkChOHa9j/b+qPm1JLDpv7jVqWynWCipQX7fvXSe7OSR/NTxSKK 2hAgJ89x2ehWn2xAzfFmAIcRCE/umUeHLZyeo59FF+jVA31IDuIkknMKXbnLS8Kckd86 6LnPX8BUOEmUQv70HCHqhUJQvk2JM8beXV/Gn5kPrlruf4xrUm91JCI3IEJsM8TA9fRP QzYmZOjVWYg4R9R5u/GKzBho9zgx49BfIabQ0cIS8ZtWflYzEYeqMAa7e9v0tXJm4eZ6 JNxA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.160.83 with SMTP id m19mr2177261qax.108.1380636501915; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 07:08:21 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.1.130 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 07:08:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1380635626.30998.28633073.5EC751F5@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <201309301901.NAA28515@mail.lariat.net> <1380635626.30998.28633073.5EC751F5@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 16:08:21 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: GcjAWfZJmXRyUAXLbBDeHpzRG4E Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE stability? From: CeDeROM To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 14:08:23 -0000 On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Mark Felder wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 14:01, Brett Glass wrote: >> How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? For me freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2 went smooth on my workstation laptop, the userland works fine :-) I remember myself "Nakatomi BSD 9.2" on the movie (in the reception hall scene), I was su suprised back then to see BSD in this kind of movie :-) Best regards :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 1 15:32:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675E4B40 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 15:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexus@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-x230.google.com (mail-oa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3565B230E for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 15:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id m6so4880368oag.7 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 08:32:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=R9RHQUy7INHiGRURhgbsI/kFeSFvtoUdcxEq40LLVno=; b=GfPsBkvW2OTFEo3OSCq4JKB/4hTPFHCMItER/ejxlNGWKY46AbWIVG5iUn8ZkFkTe0 UaJ1g3DDa/4RRMxO8sxvqLMHBFaVr4bMg/QtNUnU3usTY+lXSrtPsgoARok2QPie+H8K AbUuc9Rbo6hewte/0HA1kBuKav3Y6i+MKtVaBfR7NRhQS701j0MiGtiUIQ6kiq0ZuzAe 1VsochxhY0juA1SWorXpx4JyrvXpN8U46/1d06xOfhqwkH/C93gsuK9XrlKXCBe8fIzX hljkRGn94iTaiJKEA4LhLlWob9b0zTRP7GjslhalVcmNbCXBpEI8DblxQcQqQ6qf3Q2V Ua8w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.131.41 with SMTP id oj9mr8566682oeb.40.1380641532406; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 08:32:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.95.201 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 08:32:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 11:32:12 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: mtree: line 21: unknown user auditdistd From: alexus To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 15:32:13 -0000 I've tried upgrading my FreeBSD 9.1 to 9.2 via freebsd-update and I guess I did something wrong and now I'm trying to run mergemaster and I'm unable to do so, although I do remember merging passwd file w/ new user auditdistd how can I re-run mergemaster? f9# mergemaster *** The directory specified for the temporary root environment, /var/tmp/temproot, exists. This can be a security risk if untrusted users have access to the system. Use 'd' to delete the old /var/tmp/temproot and continue Use 't' to select a new temporary root directory Use 'e' to exit mergemaster Default is to use /var/tmp/temproot as is How should I deal with this? [Use the existing /var/tmp/temproot] *** Leaving /var/tmp/temproot intact *** Creating the temporary root environment in /var/tmp/temproot *** /var/tmp/temproot ready for use *** Creating and populating directory structure in /var/tmp/temproot mtree: line 21: unknown user auditdistd *** FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'cd' to /usr/src and install files to the temproot environment f9# From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 1 15:52:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A816C9AA for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 15:52:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexus@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-x232.google.com (mail-oa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 735D9254C for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 15:52:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id j1so5037501oag.9 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 08:52:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=fCAtXaGETM0E0YuJTD4JNwOI/QfymIHCqTD0abuaGWk=; b=hsiUUMcDQzQ9NO21OPsSUc0QXgja+cnia+L9berIlpqVz7ImJPKy/1BQsScd9NHoTr gHtEjzthyWsB1oid0rhTPKHMltP02PFMyyvWzb3tnO03k+A/E0uxnva2oiG8To/lVyKK yGIlI2+F914JaUaV/Uq53iFCUrE+U5SY49ALQqkjW8d1FUrGpRG0rMOlzeV6sMgTM+CT CT9vxG7+gb6iY5yaMC0XYcWuAtSxf80ExP3xy8n17MoDeyBVc0DL6fndPlEUvYLoBbYG QYvlZrVYrMgjfGQdwk+FzIvBRWDb9li1Haxw1+TMcO41HU7oyQo6efIrnGeO1SiZK4p1 hSgg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.33.74 with SMTP id p10mr26629684oei.18.1380642753722; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 08:52:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.95.201 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 08:52:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 11:52:33 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: mtree: line 21: unknown user auditdistd From: alexus To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 15:52:34 -0000 I even sort of have that user... f9# grep auditdistd /etc/*passwd /etc/master.passwd:auditdistd:*:78:77::0:0:Auditdistd unprivileged user:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin /etc/passwd:auditdistd:*:78:77:Auditdistd unprivileged user:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin f9# On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:32 AM, alexus wrote: > I've tried upgrading my FreeBSD 9.1 to 9.2 via freebsd-update and I guess > I did something wrong and now I'm trying to run mergemaster and I'm unable > to do so, although I do remember merging passwd file w/ new user auditdistd > > how can I re-run mergemaster? > > f9# mergemaster > > *** The directory specified for the temporary root environment, > /var/tmp/temproot, exists. This can be a security risk if untrusted > users have access to the system. > > Use 'd' to delete the old /var/tmp/temproot and continue > Use 't' to select a new temporary root directory > Use 'e' to exit mergemaster > > Default is to use /var/tmp/temproot as is > > How should I deal with this? [Use the existing /var/tmp/temproot] > > *** Leaving /var/tmp/temproot intact > > *** Creating the temporary root environment in /var/tmp/temproot > *** /var/tmp/temproot ready for use > *** Creating and populating directory structure in /var/tmp/temproot > > mtree: line 21: unknown user auditdistd > > *** FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'cd' to /usr/src and install files to > the temproot environment > > f9# > > -- http://alexus.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 1 16:20:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238C844C for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 16:20:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexus@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-x22d.google.com (mail-oa0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E270E2724 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 16:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id o17so4938651oag.4 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 09:20:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=OqpgzOtqAmOreklKwLhyqJGv7ybciGcNcR2kbDn5vc4=; b=KUCq8S2inOU5iaV4lUBYgIbPyIfjmfJgIQQsidr/qlmGHF/vJUZGaLiWVXjlkI4PZd hpgPrM5XJ7YY2D7iLcDBdTA5PeSTyDJ4flaygUsx07HMYOj7qK8bQVGXco7iCOm46vyz TgXInjYkcA6iCDNOn3wZqci7z3nT/1E4DfMP2gQ6b0zuzzzRAl2d1wrRDMpZxDm70CtJ 4jVkb8MCdhmwzd8qMnEHaqNggXiVDUG3BadR6iq1Crs95MZ6IzhF0oeAfNUwGIpjYJmZ khOsXGC8D5RG/gWgzVbJ+xbBnQM2Bm2VoT3ZQ0xF/24DjniCYBehXYkHAggpqUCoK/D3 ngzw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.173.145 with SMTP id bk17mr555090oec.64.1380644399857; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 09:19:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.95.201 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 09:19:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 12:19:59 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: mtree: line 21: unknown user auditdistd From: alexus To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 16:20:01 -0000 I've re-run pwd_mkdb now auditdistd user is there, yet back to mergemaster issues: [root@f9 ~]# pwd_mkdb -p /etc/master.passwd [root@f9 ~]# id auditdistd uid=78(auditdistd) gid=77(audit) groups=77(audit) [root@f9 ~]# mergemaster *** Creating the temporary root environment in /var/tmp/temproot *** /var/tmp/temproot ready for use *** Creating and populating directory structure in /var/tmp/temproot install: illegal option -- l usage: install [-bCcMpSsv] [-B suffix] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] file1 file2 install [-bCcMpSsv] [-B suffix] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] file1 ... fileN directory install -d [-v] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] directory ... *** FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'cd' to /usr/src and install files to the temproot environment [root@f9 ~]# On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:52 AM, alexus wrote: > I even sort of have that user... > > f9# grep auditdistd /etc/*passwd > /etc/master.passwd:auditdistd:*:78:77::0:0:Auditdistd unprivileged > user:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin > /etc/passwd:auditdistd:*:78:77:Auditdistd unprivileged > user:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin > f9# > > > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:32 AM, alexus wrote: > >> I've tried upgrading my FreeBSD 9.1 to 9.2 via freebsd-update and I guess >> I did something wrong and now I'm trying to run mergemaster and I'm unable >> to do so, although I do remember merging passwd file w/ new user auditdistd >> >> how can I re-run mergemaster? >> >> f9# mergemaster >> >> *** The directory specified for the temporary root environment, >> /var/tmp/temproot, exists. This can be a security risk if untrusted >> users have access to the system. >> >> Use 'd' to delete the old /var/tmp/temproot and continue >> Use 't' to select a new temporary root directory >> Use 'e' to exit mergemaster >> >> Default is to use /var/tmp/temproot as is >> >> How should I deal with this? [Use the existing /var/tmp/temproot] >> >> *** Leaving /var/tmp/temproot intact >> >> *** Creating the temporary root environment in /var/tmp/temproot >> *** /var/tmp/temproot ready for use >> *** Creating and populating directory structure in /var/tmp/temproot >> >> mtree: line 21: unknown user auditdistd >> >> *** FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'cd' to /usr/src and install files to >> the temproot environment >> >> f9# >> >> > > > -- > http://alexus.org/ > -- http://alexus.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 1 16:31:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9D86F8 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 16:31:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 673EE27EA for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 16:31:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail.dweimer.local [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r91G9Red012684 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 11:09:27 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 11:09:27 -0500 From: dweimer To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Port of =?UTF-8?Q?icedtea-web-=31=2E=34=5F=31=2C=20on=20=36=34=20?= =?UTF-8?Q?bit=20system=20might=20have=20a=20problem=20in=20the=20install?= =?UTF-8?Q?=20process=2E?= Organization: dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Message-ID: X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 16:31:34 -0000 I was struggling to get itweb-javaws to execute, due to it not being able to find libjava.so, after running it through truss, I was able to determine that its looking for the library under /usr/local/lib/amd64, the file is located in /usr/local/openjdk7/jre/lib/amd64, I was able to work around the problem by creating a symbolic link to point /usr/local/lib/amd64 to /usr/local/openjdk/jre/lib/amd64, as the amd64 sub-directory didn't exist in /usr/local/lib. This does make me wonder though, if I am just missing something from my environment, that's causing this. Or is the port install not doing something that it should be doing? System is a new build of 9.2-RELEASE, compiled from source, source and ports all built with clang where possible. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 1 16:35:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C54E0C2D for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 16:35:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from axelbsd@ymail.com) Received: from nm10-vm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm10-vm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.90.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76680285A for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 16:35:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.138.90.51] by nm10.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Oct 2013 16:35:45 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.128] by tm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Oct 2013 16:35:45 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp215.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Oct 2013 16:35:45 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1380645345; bh=MlWrC6+CGpi7aFVRIuUKkMuNAZJnFVuP9FLZfVvXyLg=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Received:X-Google-DKIM-Signature:X-Received:MIME-Version:Received:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=ic80pxRUlRbzX17tqCSDK93tqXmi4fIu0qpsfEj4Z9A17egDFMYpniJt+cp66Au0ZC0X8LUF5QJ1eGVsjtMOj6mOjOEvJyLCuFpyhZ4j27WA0k/ZKkB88jxZg9kjzkJCeQDVjxSN77QTrK96+Mwbp0a8RO4A5SnXKLBb8qzsQDE= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 548478.64423.bm@smtp215.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: NkULgQcVM1nYry1X.sH1n7kzIAMGcdnP7MdqIWayBa9K0_W .po9BgSzSMrOAGvqsTj_sOqvimpBGOGJUSJp5cc8QRWNi_MiSgeE5imActwH d9ngN5HppALMdz43MS_cvW0f8VAfxzijIwuRZ6cx54ezsaeWjlO2yKXpbPBZ aU1zL0eu9EwBw_4cyiKCsuZId7QHflpNJTcCV_hKo4opMA_7NfXP4rKdxR5w Sk1FASY3q7oXLfSxikTCNukt9rf9IuED2n7.H4ypYVPU5yL.Jt1C3zcfmSpk E.N5wacF72h22IjTAzJUNI5Tt72xSlklDHXutAkyW16wlPYVUyQVmcp3diyl SEKCLEX4bSpQ.KN344SZRocXjEugEE2OU51bCwpUhGdYddD1WQM0LRNzCHkz 1QSF9UIGUvp124C6YdmhfuxchaCr3ls6d3VYVbke8f2MwpIushax6YfaTCeW 1V16jSrCH0ARMUNoaPxLH.9pkD3fT0UNVY7BMBsPm7jDikexlWHnuNh5vFNB 9NQpK.dtxoTAOmZMrZ9FcZSnD0qNmOHgwIpaJlPkdhoWdUcNqiLrfK2dCsn9 A54LsJ7U.DKtwuuQka7AvXDZ.E6ymUl_tId_ryNiW2MNdbcLj976nbewWSjY Nig-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: S65s63SswBDjU54Gjqw2GSWlZmfgiEU_X3tN1_9u X-Rocket-Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (axelbsd@209.85.220.182 with ) by smtp215.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 01 Oct 2013 09:35:45 -0700 PDT Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id hf12so4952775vcb.41 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 09:35:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=MlWrC6+CGpi7aFVRIuUKkMuNAZJnFVuP9FLZfVvXyLg=; b=meJK3nnnE20tCsmVMM/PBbrFVInhTsOsl8ccf9sh5OwYlCpkZ3Uh7xGTja/l+B6Sxs HeqKqdI+A3Zb97GE7FGdfaj0Q3mHrmVwujnTp50+NqO39aC//D1Y6S5lDCt8KGoP+rTc K5AyZTZetktZaI+yOTHuXgvb2jy4CziPdEMFW9aVlUMRWj2VfMbUFLNAsicxHO+d90ce /WKYZLVH1TzzuS7Hoz+/cOXRbJX6HP7FYWyPMzNcLBeLmQqAoPZlByBpgxyw0r0tcNuc 4wqfs3vieYlibPOkoglJDMYrDqM4i7hNZScTV4GrrWOwa/A/X9kgsUocuduyantnhW8C YHWQ== X-Received: by 10.58.146.71 with SMTP id ta7mr1515781veb.23.1380645344367; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 09:35:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.59.10.199 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 09:35:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Alexandre Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 18:35:24 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: mtree: line 21: unknown user auditdistd To: alexus Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 16:35:52 -0000 On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:52 PM, alexus wrote: > I even sort of have that user... > > f9# grep auditdistd /etc/*passwd > /etc/master.passwd:auditdistd:*:78:77::0:0:Auditdistd unprivileged > user:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin > /etc/passwd:auditdistd:*:78:77:Auditdistd unprivileged > user:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin > f9# > > > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:32 AM, alexus wrote: > > > I've tried upgrading my FreeBSD 9.1 to 9.2 via freebsd-update and I guess > > I did something wrong and now I'm trying to run mergemaster and I'm > unable > > to do so, although I do remember merging passwd file w/ new user > auditdistd > > > > how can I re-run mergemaster? > > > > f9# mergemaster > > > > *** The directory specified for the temporary root environment, > > /var/tmp/temproot, exists. This can be a security risk if untrusted > > users have access to the system. > > > > Use 'd' to delete the old /var/tmp/temproot and continue > > Use 't' to select a new temporary root directory > > Use 'e' to exit mergemaster > > > > Default is to use /var/tmp/temproot as is > > > > How should I deal with this? [Use the existing /var/tmp/temproot] > > > > *** Leaving /var/tmp/temproot intact > > > > *** Creating the temporary root environment in /var/tmp/temproot > > *** /var/tmp/temproot ready for use > > *** Creating and populating directory structure in /var/tmp/temproot > > > > mtree: line 21: unknown user auditdistd > > > > *** FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'cd' to /usr/src and install files to > > the temproot environment > > > > f9# > > > > > > > -- > http://alexus.org/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hi Alexus, You should have a look to this topic on FreeBSD Forums http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=36454 Kind regards, Alexandre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 1 18:12:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A89D4A for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 18:12:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B3552DAE for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 18:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail.dweimer.local [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r91ICP8L016105 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 13:12:25 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 13:12:25 -0500 From: dweimer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port of =?UTF-8?Q?icedtea-web-=31=2E=34=5F=31=2C=20on=20=36?= =?UTF-8?Q?=34=20bit=20system=20might=20have=20a=20problem=20in=20the=20in?= =?UTF-8?Q?stall=20process=2E?= Organization: dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 18:12:27 -0000 On 10/01/2013 11:09 am, dweimer wrote: > I was struggling to get itweb-javaws to execute, due to it not being > able to find libjava.so, after running it through truss, I was able to > determine that its looking for the library under /usr/local/lib/amd64, > the file is located in /usr/local/openjdk7/jre/lib/amd64, I was able > to work around the problem by creating a symbolic link to point > /usr/local/lib/amd64 to /usr/local/openjdk/jre/lib/amd64, as the amd64 > sub-directory didn't exist in /usr/local/lib. > > This does make me wonder though, if I am just missing something from > my environment, that's causing this. Or is the port install not doing > something that it should be doing? > > System is a new build of 9.2-RELEASE, compiled from source, source and > ports all built with clang where possible. Just an update, this only worked the first time I executed it, now all I get is: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /usr/local/openjdk7/jre/lib/amd64/libsplashscreen.so: /usr/local/openjdk7/jre/lib/amd64/libsplashscreen.so: Undefined symbol "jpeg_resync_to_restart" I somewhat worked around it by installing the linux_sun_jre 7.40, and pointing icedtea webstart at it, searching online shows this to be most likely be a bug in the port of openjdk. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=119654 -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 1 19:34:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C3173D for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 19:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from btillman99@yahoo.com) Received: from nm10-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm10-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.213.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76EE52322 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 19:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.212.145] by nm10.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Oct 2013 19:34:15 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.222] by tm2.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Oct 2013 19:34:15 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1031.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Oct 2013 19:34:15 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 793698.78156.bm@omp1031.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 29774 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Oct 2013 19:34:15 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1380656055; bh=mqh5OId9RUo2TM2VGA00K0s+64AmBbziyu3OcY0IEZo=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HgmZauDmUYpMIbmamXHXQVShkt6xsP/IxM1O57SQRGyKf1852hm4OUMge8wcbVvgWhxxzKbCCs7F3Tq99EVPyIZB3xD7M8c4qYeUaoauaDuynrF9Fwgq56dGLX3+eRdeTPOBtQEEA0dulD5nppwcH+nAyrPEjxbd4BbMZ6EYzEk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=aemFmIb49vv6qxkxamblK6nhvYfPYBs6wcHoXlmSRAVH9UGNBCIaPogZoVvX7uml4MIPCB4gh1pk4zHK0dVvBr6b/joTfOq0Z3YQaL/MU7siaN9CY0Q0j0lDMk/eXrKZAvbsxomXprr8bVSdSGi+yTMW99b2oIBo6MvKu0LwgTU=; X-YMail-OSG: EiZ6wPwVM1kKngEevMACRH.4QUw49mBb1qF1GCemxbsVxnT NY9jLtoJrHd3KZQvI5p4SizG2N6YrxxlI5Fj..wQTKcKKt8jLfT5oHTqie1n uAa.ULqDox.KPun4rqNr07dR.OKsy2V5cUpGq9Qn_oNmh.9V8EPCXKRCH_gL 2L_Yo_qouH_WtEKp1nEBM3su.yIBG1Q1qpXm31HykH_5SkRDaRXmUSzXP1mk 545Iz03z8yeLf70oWvkRkLgWlTdJtwhkJbN2owJ9ObTVh1TQIO8hihYpmdSw HhFPWc7RThyj_XGPqfHLE4mHyfGMFKMWyjnMrtQ6Xv6B1I9k6X7iscVMZVA8 KKlOqYW67rK16T8.62RrtqHUIq0IxXdDxLARdGhfrpgL58e2JujXCjO7ZhiK MqtIJ.bnLp26gGKSQH.hIh8T.EV9nCnBFIcMlhx6VC_Z59RAjdc8ieykEO54 ijV9HUp.DPzZ4ZH7WXKGKHmQeX.kxrU8Ky2V9EgGRYor5gSqiswGtueJ2M.F O7ITgxIezyfkcVpz_nbxxtEqaqv8C8kaRlgK5yjsCYRmwhlEkKb3UI_qMJWp zFXEn.2eCh8zfdVjcffavujdWZiKXubABUQ2D60ae Received: from [173.221.141.195] by web165001.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 12:34:15 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, CgoKCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCiBGcm9tOiBNaWNoYWVsIDxtaWNoaXBpbGlAZ21haWwuY29tPgpUbzogImZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnIiA8ZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc.IApTZW50OiBUdWVzZGF5LCBPY3RvYmVyIDEsIDIwMTMgMjoyMiBBTQpTdWJqZWN0OiBTb2VrcmlzIGZvciBhIFRyYWMgc2VydmVyCiAKCkkgYW0gcGxhbm5pbmcgdG8gbW92ZSBhIGphaWwtaG9zdGVkIHNlcnZpY2UgdG8gYSBwaHlzaWNhbCBkZXZpY2UgYW5kCncBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.160.587 References: <524A6A26.30903@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1380656055.18443.YahooMailNeo@web165001.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 12:34:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Tillman Subject: Re: Soekris for a Trac server To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <524A6A26.30903@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bill Tillman List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 19:34:22 -0000 =0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0A From: Michael =0ATo: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" =0ASent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 2:22 AM=0ASubject: Soekris for a Trac= server=0A =0A=0AI am planning to move a jail-hosted service to a physical = device and=0Awould like to hear the advices of experts here.=0A=0A=0AMy ser= vice runs sshd, apache and trac (the ticket service) and I am=0Aconsidering= getting one of the products by soekris. I know that some=0Alist users have= some experience with these products so it would be very=0Anice for me to e= ar if this kind of product is suitable for my project=0Aand if FreeBSD is d= oing well on these platforms.=0A=0AAlso I am bit unsure about the setup I s= hould pick: we are a hand of=0Ausers for the service and I would like to kn= ow if a 64-MB Ram and a=0A166Mhz setup could do, or if I definitely should = consider a faster CPU=0Aor more RAM. Given my actual jail based setup, is t= here an easy way to=0Aguess the required RAM =E2=80=94 In the jail `top` re= ports a Size of 111M for=0Athe Python process, but I guess the interpreter = is taking things easy=0Awhen a lot of RAM is available, doesn't it?=0A=0ALa= st, are FreeBSD jails lightweight enough to run in such a constrained=0Aenv= ironment? It is not unlikely that the device evolves to run several=0Aother= services (like a nfs) and I would appreciate to be able to confine=0Aservi= ces appropriately using jails.=0A=0AThank you for your comments!=0AMichael= =0A=0A_______________________________________________=0Afreebsd-questions@f= reebsd.org mailing list=0Ahttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd= -questions=0ATo unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscrib= e@freebsd.org"=0A=0A=0AThe way technology has moved on these days I would a= pproach this from a=0Acompletely different manner. Soekris makes some cool = little boxes, but the=0Alast time I looked they still had I486 cpu's...toda= y may be different, probably=0Ais. My point is that with computers so cheap= these days why not just use=0Aa box, sans the drives and do a diskless boo= t from one of your FreeBSD=0Aservers...or better yet, setup another FreeBSD= server using VM. It doesn't=0Amake sense to buy a box with VM technology s= o freely available. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 1 19:55:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86DBB265 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 19:55:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29EF12503 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 19:55:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99992 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2013 19:55:08 -0000 Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 1 Oct 2013 19:55:08 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=524b289c.xn--hew.k1309; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=awKP6/4M3XBTqLIj8z63X8gAz8wFNOk/Zhn6HWd5YUA=; b=om7DjeOuEfKj39AQuRSEiGwhTEvNxHRP2/1tEcxo7WbI506QUqqN+hLpVaAXg/v+xLjKdZrvHPwlHdue6dObav+g/iPruqx8eH/heTIznMhN0nx/ER2yEoqV6Aeyl4w986nKHlGvJtffoM3LiUuMyCiwq2eR2Fl+44WPZU3KQhYA5bK6wkxA6ZTXoaEw+1YQQid9WTLOwC90wwBt5dovWm8ra1STqcykFFh22lyzqThaCSi3nl1S3/PHXwLLHxBP Date: 1 Oct 2013 19:54:46 -0000 Message-ID: <20131001195446.68658.qmail@joyce.lan> From: "John Levine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Soekris for a Trac server In-Reply-To: <1380656055.18443.YahooMailNeo@web165001.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Cc: btillman99@yahoo.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 19:55:10 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dunno about Soekris, but I'm very happy with one of these mini-box systems that cost about $250 with a 60GB SSD disk: http://www.mini-box.com/MiniPC-Value-Systems I got a fan but it doesn't need it. It runs ordinary amd64 FreeBSD 9.1, installed from a thumb drive. It provides DNS, DHCP, and some other random services on my home network. It's also my backup server, running a four drive ZFS raid with an ESATA controller, so I bumped the RAM up to 4GB. My only complaint is that the PCI slot doesn't have a matching cutout on the back panel for for the ESATA adapter I have to use a riser card and leave the cover off, which looks stupid but looks fine. It's just like any other FreeBSD box do I don't see why it wouldn't run jails perfecty well. R's, John -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlJLKJsACgkQkEiFRdeC/kWt/QCeKyA1GOHNxWXtx+oXSLEYocay L58An1PAV3zGKO9/9mvOhARkCkkgvExq =jLRV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 1 20:11:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DF3859 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 20:11:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@aboutsupport.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f42.google.com (mail-bk0-f42.google.com [209.85.214.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ADA2267E for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 20:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f42.google.com with SMTP id my10so2870395bkb.15 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 13:11:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AToGhw/t24LuVCt8B6pFlA7NDmt4MjXiWKRoGr7ix0g=; b=GIq7ZvT9N/Jqfa+bz2Ad7O0q8Isf1jHREfLt7Bom2lze+UBZpisydwRBM7qBzpCB9t 8VEDaSObuDrwv23cYeGe7l07VQv/d7yCZCjNlajhJGRnDheVT3KJdhW/uqQILmV3smg/ 6+wzjBOwlvZIxQwjcisQbmyUW16wz9ZziDEx0DKr9cw6mCfTbexMVtuujQZYvMOM7HVp Dm1XiJQiDlDqB7NhRULY3kifyB+6lRrsWFTbrFkxsIgeHnWosK8Z0cOr7+ivrZ9dIOal 7rCopKSZMiBd5uIgTxgJtA3K8cPG+Et39bYkjI2t/vvlb0dz3etKOexVh9OacKS0slwt stkw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlWscebDpWoPvYd+4R5BohsS+N6H0iKE+RnJjXIbzHB9y9rMPUA4L5ZAx1HJq6UtH9eWJlj X-Received: by 10.205.35.15 with SMTP id su15mr25812349bkb.21.1380658263387; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 13:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.30.151] ([95.87.236.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id kk2sm4867398bkb.10.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Oct 2013 13:11:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <524B2C54.5020006@aboutsupport.com> Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 23:11:00 +0300 From: "Zyumbilev, Peter" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130911 Thunderbird/17.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: recover gpt partion Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 20:11:05 -0000 Hi, I have hardware raid LSI - 20 TB, one GPT partion /dev/mfid0p1. System is boatable from the system disk, however GPT partion on raid seem corrupted. When I try to do fsck -y -t ufs I get Cannot find file system superblock ioctl (GCINFO): Inappropriate ioctl for device cant't read bsd label. What is the correct procedure to try recovery ? Thanks, Peter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 1 23:54:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B27A7A for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 23:54:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from other@ahhyes.net) Received: from srv.ahhyes.net (unknown [IPv6:2607:fcd0:100:d::d3f3:e6ce]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22624251E for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 23:54:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ahhyes.net; s=x; h=Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=cWYRLF/aoT4kfoLwwDQhYy1bf+oUUZd8yaxgx+hJHCM=; b=jIM/YBUaiPCM5U3WRL/BoFPB+d/Cmxfshxy123GnuKIqYq3bnqbXrlbZNjG7Fi9NCL0J/Zas/WLilPS/Wohk6peT9jOF2zuXwtT0ry+ZtHMf3FwFMjF7AmvEPV9GPkvi1Q7DxwBNvdehrtXybi30OYRVEr3RFjQhHBDeWqNtECI=; Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=ahhyes.net) by srv.ahhyes.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VR9lw-0000yi-AI; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 09:54:32 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 09:54:32 +1000 From: other@ahhyes.net To: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE =?UTF-8?Q?stability=3F?= Message-ID: <6626ce0550512bd3f61892552c863763@ahhyes.net> X-Sender: other@ahhyes.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.4 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: other@ahhyes.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on srv.ahhyes.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 23:54:33 -0000 On Mon, Sep 30, 2013, at 14:01, Brett Glass wrote: > How stable are folks finding FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE to be? The > improvements are welcome, but there have been a few troubling > messages about kernel panics and VM issues on the various mailing > lists. It's never clear until the release drops whether these are > actual problems with the software or hardware defects in individual > systems, so I am eager to hear how the new release is working for > everyone. > very frustrated at the moment... I've had some very strange issues crop up since upgrading from 9.1-RELEASE to 9.2-RELEASE. I'm using FreeBSD on a Xen HVM instance. My previous install was a system with a custom kernel (includes Xen HVM options) (entire base and kernel compiled with Clang 3.1 (base clang)). The system worked flawlessly. A "rinse and repeat" upgrade (build from source) with 9.2 is giving me some very strange issues: * Randomly when I start the VM, there is no network connectivity. I first noticed DHCP was timing out. The link appeared to be up on the xn0 interface but no data flow at all. Attempted manual interface configuration. Zilch, couldn't even get a response from the default gateway when pinging (both ipv4 and ipv6). A reboot of the machine and suddenly network connectivity is restored. Subsequently with no predictability, another reboot = no network again. No errors in dmesg or /var/log/messages. * /usr/ports/net/net-im/jabber (which appears not to have changed versions between my system upgrade) randomly aborts with signal 10 (bus error)..... * Programs that rely on mysql (installed percona 5.5 server) (such as jabber, powerdns etc) spew a bunch of errors saying they are unable to connect to the mysql server via /tmp/mysql.sock, after I log in and look, mysql is running just fine, and the programs that were complaining about mysql being unreachable are all operating correctly... (i have mysql set to start in /etc/rc.d before any of the programs that require it are started) -- never saw these issues in 9.1 * I run powerdns recursor for resolution of domain names. Despite having the recursor as being one of the first things in rc.conf to start (certainly before ntpdate), ntpdate decides to run before the recursor has started. This causes the lookup of the ntp server hostname to fail (using -b ip.ip.ip.ip as a flag to ntpdate rather than a host is a way to work around the issue). This was a clean build. I cleared up old libraries and rebuilt all my installed ports from scratch, I left no kruft lingering on the system to the best of my knowledge. Normally I would put something like the jabber server issue just being bad code that clang is happy to compile.. But the random network issue has the alarm bells ringing. Perhaps there is an issue with clang 3.3 generating faulty code? I havent had any kernel panics or machine freezes. This has to be a first for me with freebsd, I almost never ever have an issue after upgrading from RELEASE to RELEASE. I can probably rebuild it all again with the base gcc compiler, but clang is much much faster than the dinosaur gcc included in base and produces better code. Up in the air with this one. I might go back to 9.1, had none of these issues with it. /my 10 cents worth. BR, Alex. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 2 00:29:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D1DFD2 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 00:29:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA82E26DD for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 00:29:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801E5215EA for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 20:29:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 01 Oct 2013 20:29:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to :references; s=smtpout; bh=0DGEJnojZ+ebc+5FucaOVI7k22Y=; b=G1vyZ cTEBUzPuCjN0c30ZJNn2Fu5prBRPvmOPOOPCJ3woYYh3VYeVkWMs+dEJdXHiZFT1 FICQM2agbRzIZsece/4XD64KKr7V52TvG3Ym4tz0p14AJB183AxxUOob9WTZoSrn 00ryptFoZd1Gp67yachrvJpNJEtZQmt43Brfvw= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id 64159B00003; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 20:29:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1380673752.20677.28872921.50126320@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: K2HrfZrzopILCW1dQqSQAxBr7pJ7hlcvp2SB3qCB9Jd9 1380673752 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-ce174988 Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE stability? Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 19:29:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <6626ce0550512bd3f61892552c863763@ahhyes.net> References: <6626ce0550512bd3f61892552c863763@ahhyes.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 00:29:14 -0000 On Tue, Oct 1, 2013, at 18:54, other@ahhyes.net wrote: > > * I run powerdns recursor for resolution of domain names. Despite > having the recursor as being one of the first things > in rc.conf to start (certainly before ntpdate), ntpdate decides to run > before the recursor has started. This causes the lookup of the ntp > server > hostname to fail (using -b ip.ip.ip.ip as a flag to ntpdate rather than > a host is a way to work around the issue). > Create in rc script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d that does nothing but set the REQUIRE and BEFORE fields. You can use that to re-order the startup scripts. Use the `service` command to see the new startup order -- there's a flag that will give you that output. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 2 06:01:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B568527A for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 06:01:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26E472E98 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 06:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9261TXd067937 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:01:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id r9261TsY067934; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:01:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:01:29 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: alexus Subject: Re: mtree: line 21: unknown user auditdistd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="2055831798-1394716603-1380693689=:70367" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.fig.ol.no Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 06:01:35 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --2055831798-1394716603-1380693689=:70367 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 12:19-0400, alexus wrote: > I've re-run pwd_mkdb now auditdistd user is there, yet back to mergemaster > issues: > > [root@f9 ~]# pwd_mkdb -p /etc/master.passwd > [root@f9 ~]# id auditdistd > uid=78(auditdistd) gid=77(audit) groups=77(audit) > [root@f9 ~]# mergemaster > > *** Creating the temporary root environment in /var/tmp/temproot > *** /var/tmp/temproot ready for use > *** Creating and populating directory structure in /var/tmp/temproot > > install: illegal option -- l > usage: install [-bCcMpSsv] [-B suffix] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] > [-o owner] file1 file2 > install [-bCcMpSsv] [-B suffix] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] > [-o owner] file1 ... fileN directory > install -d [-v] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] directory ... > > *** FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'cd' to /usr/src and install files to > the temproot environment > > [root@f9 ~]# You need to semi-manually install a new version of mergemaster: cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/mergemaster && make install See the 20130430 entry in /usr/src/UPDATING. > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:52 AM, alexus wrote: > > > I even sort of have that user... > > > > f9# grep auditdistd /etc/*passwd > > /etc/master.passwd:auditdistd:*:78:77::0:0:Auditdistd unprivileged > > user:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin > > /etc/passwd:auditdistd:*:78:77:Auditdistd unprivileged > > user:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin > > f9# > > > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:32 AM, alexus wrote: > > > >> I've tried upgrading my FreeBSD 9.1 to 9.2 via freebsd-update and I guess > >> I did something wrong and now I'm trying to run mergemaster and I'm unable > >> to do so, although I do remember merging passwd file w/ new user auditdistd > >> > >> how can I re-run mergemaster? > >> > >> f9# mergemaster > >> > >> *** The directory specified for the temporary root environment, > >> /var/tmp/temproot, exists. This can be a security risk if untrusted > >> users have access to the system. > >> > >> Use 'd' to delete the old /var/tmp/temproot and continue > >> Use 't' to select a new temporary root directory > >> Use 'e' to exit mergemaster > >> > >> Default is to use /var/tmp/temproot as is > >> > >> How should I deal with this? [Use the existing /var/tmp/temproot] > >> > >> *** Leaving /var/tmp/temproot intact > >> > >> *** Creating the temporary root environment in /var/tmp/temproot > >> *** /var/tmp/temproot ready for use > >> *** Creating and populating directory structure in /var/tmp/temproot > >> > >> mtree: line 21: unknown user auditdistd > >> > >> *** FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'cd' to /usr/src and install files to > >> the temproot environment > >> > >> f9# > > > > -- > > http://alexus.org/ -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ --2055831798-1394716603-1380693689=:70367-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 2 10:57:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FF0F0B for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 10:57:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from axelbsd@ymail.com) Received: from nm13-vm3.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm13-vm3.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.136.218.222]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 579192C06 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 10:57:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.137.12.57] by nm13.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Oct 2013 10:57:22 -0000 Received: from [208.71.42.199] by tm2.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Oct 2013 10:57:22 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp210.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Oct 2013 10:57:22 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1380711442; bh=djLgiYM186TC5GiVSk/ZK+5VGSg3P6NvxcIw2jruTJs=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Received:X-Google-DKIM-Signature:X-Received:MIME-Version:Received:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=FImLgFQipFNpjwAyeVLIHtyZ0im8obCwaLw9vYMlWJ2vzNvIOOzGmGBRtZFzEOSRxXRjHu4mVuME9kK0tKZTmBzqqGTRDXDOvgErG+yCByDspta27+o+wQWIPR4Vqrw07d6tzwwMZPnoo4PEtLZ648gq4oK0fJW6K2YAh/SffGY= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 648932.11904.bm@smtp210.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 4d5FS3EVM1m6y_Vf6IwYoFMH2q2MzgcqPc4j2HwjQhaekhC A1jAlkMZhBNiDaeQzw0tf1zS3eIIVFJFhTGRyUS576.IWvTpgi73wSoLbE3W LsbTwv7UxA1CH53WyktZ59FJkTkwA3lILEdRTRhZAB_boWhSj2dczlj0LWdi HwWdkpPH9ac.rwZYiqWIJjSwFFfqTI8l95vBswXaVBO46z5spYR2y6dUcF9o 647lyFBJuWd48JhXxL4R9TLal_LcdwSm6ksp7TqvsyTyvU4WRIAByzPB0wnP 3CFx3Er51O0D268WyKc2iOOqBw1s.hKvPHbfQ1QrHhRc9d6obRbFqc6UyleI B0i.YWQIn6D634hW1AAw4OkIlPXHuuXnUY4hxHJArrrrEJp5Nc9nAP_gANwU jScXJKZC9FBJetQ9Kroc1NlPNA8IdshfpwIxNRCvJXF8vvj_.r96kXxHs.YH ERZQKnHKwd3E3WwINNIYx2eenunjAcAwx_uOOXCUGAedzI021F.jWoOUmd2r p1cwP0XDnp_W9cYs7VuR9HNUY_n.Zfgxq3tIs8c8Yo44LTl1t7_71zIZBjIt Bp4oT3obEJZDp6s7bIPVG5VHNCp_ft7Jxk5A37ezpotF4EYnOSVfyVFm_Y0z Pk17Y5w-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: S65s63SswBDjU54Gjqw2GSWlZmfgiEU_X3tN1_9u X-Rocket-Received: from mail-vb0-f41.google.com (axelbsd@209.85.212.41 with ) by smtp210.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 02 Oct 2013 03:57:22 -0700 PDT Received: by mail-vb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id g17so372108vbg.14 for ; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 03:57:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=djLgiYM186TC5GiVSk/ZK+5VGSg3P6NvxcIw2jruTJs=; b=N+/FS6vMubU8Wa77Y/hZsA0JyA+wpkoisZ6BlGArk/8YkWiVyZPtIH/QblQD/ynIUH /MGNTKRvmjN4w6kSzY+OU1gRvCE2B4utGQC1A+n1IAZHfqZRzW0tZq7eTcXqTgbPNsJ+ i/OhaTgaXGhB7tLiCAHAtyvXBUS0jI6tzpv5K9wYBef2X3NOX/SGt5/PRpulOWkd/Qbz H560qW/qe1wL29P9nrWlda6tr65ldzjjz6Ojx0dg7GLLEHiSFWbui/60xw/iObDb3P3R 2TvxAd5f8YDRd9PWn14HzL9IvECWnNR+QL+c/TXEMrybz//NvCmjx47Xu8c6lZg2/SQg 8qFg== X-Received: by 10.220.88.13 with SMTP id y13mr1498144vcl.20.1380711441243; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 03:57:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.59.10.199 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 03:57:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Alexandre Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:57:00 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: mtree: line 21: unknown user auditdistd To: =?UTF-8?Q?Trond_Endrest=C3=B8l?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: alexus , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 10:57:29 -0000 On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Trond Endrest=C3=B8l < Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no> wrote: > On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 12:19-0400, alexus wrote: > > > I've re-run pwd_mkdb now auditdistd user is there, yet back to > mergemaster > > issues: > > > > [root@f9 ~]# pwd_mkdb -p /etc/master.passwd > > [root@f9 ~]# id auditdistd > > uid=3D78(auditdistd) gid=3D77(audit) groups=3D77(audit) > > [root@f9 ~]# mergemaster > > > > *** Creating the temporary root environment in /var/tmp/temproot > > *** /var/tmp/temproot ready for use > > *** Creating and populating directory structure in /var/tmp/temproot > > > > install: illegal option -- l > > usage: install [-bCcMpSsv] [-B suffix] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] > > [-o owner] file1 file2 > > install [-bCcMpSsv] [-B suffix] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] > > [-o owner] file1 ... fileN directory > > install -d [-v] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] directory ... > > > > *** FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'cd' to /usr/src and install files to > > the temproot environment > > > > [root@f9 ~]# > > You need to semi-manually install a new version of mergemaster: > > cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/mergemaster && make install > > See the 20130430 entry in /usr/src/UPDATING. > > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:52 AM, alexus wrote: > > > > > I even sort of have that user... > > > > > > f9# grep auditdistd /etc/*passwd > > > /etc/master.passwd:auditdistd:*:78:77::0:0:Auditdistd unprivileged > > > user:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin > > > /etc/passwd:auditdistd:*:78:77:Auditdistd unprivileged > > > user:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin > > > f9# > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:32 AM, alexus wrote: > > > > > >> I've tried upgrading my FreeBSD 9.1 to 9.2 via freebsd-update and I > guess > > >> I did something wrong and now I'm trying to run mergemaster and I'm > unable > > >> to do so, although I do remember merging passwd file w/ new user > auditdistd > > >> > > >> how can I re-run mergemaster? > > >> > > >> f9# mergemaster > > >> > > >> *** The directory specified for the temporary root environment, > > >> /var/tmp/temproot, exists. This can be a security risk if > untrusted > > >> users have access to the system. > > >> > > >> Use 'd' to delete the old /var/tmp/temproot and continue > > >> Use 't' to select a new temporary root directory > > >> Use 'e' to exit mergemaster > > >> > > >> Default is to use /var/tmp/temproot as is > > >> > > >> How should I deal with this? [Use the existing /var/tmp/temproot] > > >> > > >> *** Leaving /var/tmp/temproot intact > > >> > > >> *** Creating the temporary root environment in /var/tmp/temproot > > >> *** /var/tmp/temproot ready for use > > >> *** Creating and populating directory structure in /var/tmp/temproo= t > > >> > > >> mtree: line 21: unknown user auditdistd > > >> > > >> *** FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'cd' to /usr/src and install files to > > >> the temproot environment > > >> > > >> f9# > > > > > > -- > > > http://alexus.org/ > > -- > +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ > | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | > | Trond Endrest=C3=B8l, | Trond Endrest=C3=B8l, = | > | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | > | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gj=C3=B8vik Technical College, Norway, = | > | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | > | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | > +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hi Trond and Alexus, The tool used by freebsd-update to merge system files is "merge(1)", not "mergemaster(8)". See manpage merge(1) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=3Dmerge&apropos=3D0&sektion=3D0&ma= npath=3DFreeBSD+9.2-RELEASE&arch=3Ddefault&format=3Dhtml for more information. I use mergemaster(8) tool if I deal with sources system upgrade process. Kind regards, Alexandre From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 2 11:34:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25F7F06 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 11:34:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x22f.google.com (mail-la0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BC74207E for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 11:34:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id eo20so493674lab.6 for ; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 04:34:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tUvCDJcCp7xkRs/XvAeM5gqrVfLB8KDiP3jOFtkJ1lI=; b=SW651EYlojFyc5o0RRvAcwSmQEkz6SU07CZTknJW2uHzoDA0Q7GJWomFx1kZWb979p YSEyynCGBkv15FWi7VYLwtDNxBvBvpBfYubr6RYRk/8ZLwPS2fHWYBXw6CJMyBRKtgxJ jPtNopK/zdxjvpmaQpWCh17ApE+6JJgEYkHgcI0Oe9OOacP5hvxUuUT2ZU4Cs507K0Nl J43nmd1VrT4mR3m2GQAkC7eHMAjI9kHYbilrWAr9sTTtjb5RQ41JvnwNY3Y8qzM97BE3 Zz7NVsvm1lCAdlVHkjSDRGw+tCX6DkI4bdANf9IhGIMh1AatqKtz1iqSkl2H24aoWvG3 GosA== X-Received: by 10.112.158.225 with SMTP id wx1mr1255706lbb.37.1380713675458; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 04:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.128] (mau.donbass.com. [92.242.127.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id zc3sm1422324lbb.2.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Oct 2013 04:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <524C04C3.3080304@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 14:34:27 +0300 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dweimer@dweimer.net, FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Port of icedtea-web-1.4_1, on 64 bit system might have a problem in the install process. References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 11:34:38 -0000 01.10.2013 19:09, dweimer wrote: > I was struggling to get itweb-javaws to execute, due to it not being > able to find libjava.so, after running it through truss, I was able to > determine that its looking for the library under /usr/local/lib/amd64, > the file is located in /usr/local/openjdk7/jre/lib/amd64, I was able to > work around the problem by creating a symbolic link to point > /usr/local/lib/amd64 to /usr/local/openjdk/jre/lib/amd64, as the amd64 > sub-directory didn't exist in /usr/local/lib. > > This does make me wonder though, if I am just missing something from my > environment, that's causing this. Or is the port install not doing > something that it should be doing? Never faced this, itweb-javaws works for me without library shuffling but with one tiny fix to startup script: `exec "${COMMAND[@]}"`. -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 2 11:35:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835AC77 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 11:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com (mail-lb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E8BC20A8 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 11:35:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id x18so620279lbi.17 for ; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 04:35:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=islaW3c9jLXtaiHfv+LeISsepOA3jXRW/zZZ+sZ/t9w=; b=wrQf6OOzhsD++qZvSJ9eYgAeEnq6YXMiAD3wOMOg4qZykLUVr3kWYZH3hjjBfHzCu6 s3oMDAzhzS1UtKvl0VllsbrWTEroWHLYbIiMwNTb7FYr6oIUjrgLW6ynq4Q++ykJuv4I 844V9UR53Y0EnZFp+yXTwuCGVIS2DJsQuqI12O1fYWgLCwsFkViGsl/PON7jUJ+GOD72 qMVKZQdqjwjWTQ4x85HNt7MPfaetg2rYoIySVRg6cIuV3JFvQiZDJ62lRMt6+3z1BMpj mRRDn4vRhGSPthgr4A0f37Js6kg4eWZJk9gWfhIu2tSqtmP1d7DcSgcSnTklFyhn5k+F UkBA== X-Received: by 10.112.50.109 with SMTP id b13mr861585lbo.47.1380713754156; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 04:35:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.128] (mau.donbass.com. [92.242.127.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n15sm1115126laa.2.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Oct 2013 04:35:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <524C0518.2050207@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 14:35:52 +0300 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dweimer@dweimer.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port of icedtea-web-1.4_1, on 64 bit system might have a problem in the install process. References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 11:35:56 -0000 01.10.2013 21:12, dweimer wrote: > On 10/01/2013 11:09 am, dweimer wrote: >> I was struggling to get itweb-javaws to execute, due to it not being >> able to find libjava.so, after running it through truss, I was able to >> determine that its looking for the library under /usr/local/lib/amd64, >> the file is located in /usr/local/openjdk7/jre/lib/amd64, I was able >> to work around the problem by creating a symbolic link to point >> /usr/local/lib/amd64 to /usr/local/openjdk/jre/lib/amd64, as the amd64 >> sub-directory didn't exist in /usr/local/lib. >> >> This does make me wonder though, if I am just missing something from >> my environment, that's causing this. Or is the port install not doing >> something that it should be doing? >> >> System is a new build of 9.2-RELEASE, compiled from source, source and >> ports all built with clang where possible. > > Just an update, this only worked the first time I executed it, now all I > get is: > > java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: > /usr/local/openjdk7/jre/lib/amd64/libsplashscreen.so: > /usr/local/openjdk7/jre/lib/amd64/libsplashscreen.so: Undefined symbol > "jpeg_resync_to_restart" Try `-headless`. You wont see the shiny logo though... -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 2 12:13:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DD8F54 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:13:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E522324D4 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail.dweimer.local [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r92CDALx051366 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Oct 2013 07:13:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 07:13:10 -0500 From: dweimer To: Volodymyr Kostyrko Subject: Re: Port of =?UTF-8?Q?icedtea-web-=31=2E=34=5F=31=2C=20on=20=36?= =?UTF-8?Q?=34=20bit=20system=20might=20have=20a=20problem=20in=20the=20in?= =?UTF-8?Q?stall=20process=2E?= Organization: dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: <524C0518.2050207@gmail.com> References: <524C0518.2050207@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4beb88f54b47462745ad7c4eb777f040@dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 12:13:13 -0000 On 10/02/2013 6:35 am, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > 01.10.2013 21:12, dweimer wrote: >> On 10/01/2013 11:09 am, dweimer wrote: >>> I was struggling to get itweb-javaws to execute, due to it not being >>> able to find libjava.so, after running it through truss, I was able >>> to >>> determine that its looking for the library under >>> /usr/local/lib/amd64, >>> the file is located in /usr/local/openjdk7/jre/lib/amd64, I was able >>> to work around the problem by creating a symbolic link to point >>> /usr/local/lib/amd64 to /usr/local/openjdk/jre/lib/amd64, as the >>> amd64 >>> sub-directory didn't exist in /usr/local/lib. >>> >>> This does make me wonder though, if I am just missing something from >>> my environment, that's causing this. Or is the port install not >>> doing >>> something that it should be doing? >>> >>> System is a new build of 9.2-RELEASE, compiled from source, source >>> and >>> ports all built with clang where possible. >> >> Just an update, this only worked the first time I executed it, now all >> I >> get is: >> >> java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: >> /usr/local/openjdk7/jre/lib/amd64/libsplashscreen.so: >> /usr/local/openjdk7/jre/lib/amd64/libsplashscreen.so: Undefined symbol >> "jpeg_resync_to_restart" > > Try `-headless`. You wont see the shiny logo though... Thank you, this fixed that part, silly me, I was searching the help for things like -nosplash, and disable splash screen. Didn't realize that this was the same thing: -headless Disables download window, other UIs. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 2 13:04:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5342B1 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 13:04:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pulsarpietro@aol.com) Received: from omr-d07.mx.aol.com (omr-d07.mx.aol.com [205.188.109.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5015C2884 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 13:04:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mtaomg-da02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-da02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.138]) by omr-d07.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 3396C701316AF for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:59:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from core-dha002a.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-dha002.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.208.130]) by mtaomg-da02.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id E15A9E00008B for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:59:04 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: DS-Lite X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Pietro Paolini Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 38079-STANDARD Received: from 185.15.248.65 by webmail-d226.sysops.aol.com (149.174.160.225) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 02 Oct 2013 08:59:04 -0400 Message-Id: <8D08D864EDE2D60-2300-40DCE@webmail-d226.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [185.15.248.65] Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:59:04 -0400 (EDT) x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1380718745; bh=reEQNi3NmmgoXXpIo7JuTaQPnbcC8eKj7HMRE4U01tg=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NocJypf11CNw4mRRVyV4CxukK4/3hQSO3PBjLruJOK23FcyYiad2XXjNSfts4j5wh H3gWBPLEEzSh8eXdr/bifyCJ16hljDj6aXx4r9qLLV/+1M2qV2dhrxw2R5Zi7Aktkf zjTNMLseih1BEDuXo04CxbDesUJ+eyX5d37rTtOU= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d338a524c18983193 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 13:04:17 -0000 I am struggling in finding some documentation which can help me to=20 understand how to configure an DS-Lite ip tunnel ipv4->ipv6 |netowrk|=20 ipv6->ipv4, my topology is composed by a Linux and a FreeBSD machine. Linux (( TUNNEL )) FreeBSD I know how to configure it in Linux but I have problem in retrieving=20 those informations for FreeBSD, someone can point me on that ? Thanks a lot. Pietro Paolini pulsarpietro@aol.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 2 15:34:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0C6CCA for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:34:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@gmx.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EE1F227E for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.69.176] ([79.110.95.2]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MAUpK-1VYVAo07bO-00BbaR for ; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 17:34:08 +0200 Message-ID: <524C3CF0.8050502@gmx.com> Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 17:34:08 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Global Users Mailing List Subject: zfs flag denoting unclean shutdown? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:3haGqom6zxJ31IRo+4LZqk27XzCrBEIv960LNIFkheECdGrT//r PxbFzJSGrJHEDP23Jw3RvqlgNYf6h9qyxiRxKiAGUiXhIx6kiv4HPmcjg20qmwtLCIUUqt6 SwZAgCxwzmiivIrHXhiJIhgKbfUUz+aWuywplW3lQA8ilvtD3MffMcJwnFLTIN2IXa3cDSU QsyroS0akrgoDJDDPxHXQ== X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 15:34:11 -0000 Hi, Is there a way to know if a zfs pool had an unclean shutdown? An attribute or maybe something during mount time similar to what ufs does (WARNING: / was not properly dismounted)? Thanks, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 2 18:14:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DEDC56 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 18:14:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DA142E6B for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 18:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r92IDrlu042523 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 19:13:53 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk r92IDrlu042523 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/r92IDrlu042523; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (unprotected policy) Message-ID: <524C6259.9030609@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 19:13:45 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs flag denoting unclean shutdown? References: <524C3CF0.8050502@gmx.com> In-Reply-To: <524C3CF0.8050502@gmx.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="llBeec5N7BOQsUhD6uKMOVIdqPB9H2qcK" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 18:14:00 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --llBeec5N7BOQsUhD6uKMOVIdqPB9H2qcK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/10/2013 16:34, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > Is there a way to know if a zfs pool had an unclean shutdown? > An attribute or maybe something during mount time similar to what ufs > does (WARNING: / was not properly dismounted)? Other than looking at the system logs for evidence of an abnormal shutdown, no. (Absence of anything in the logs is pretty good evidence for the system falling over pretty hard... Usually something to do with the power being turned off.) However, due to the design of ZFS unclean shutdowns like this are nowhere near as problematic as on UFS. Basically, you're guaranteed that what is written on disk is always consistent. You might lose a few transactions -- essentially the last few seconds of file system activity -- but that doesn't usually make a great deal of difference after the system reboots again. Oh, yeah -- absolutely no time will be needed to be spent cleaning and repairing filesystems: with ZFS, reboot after crash is as fast as a normal reboot. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --llBeec5N7BOQsUhD6uKMOVIdqPB9H2qcK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iKYEARECAGYFAlJMYmBfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEI1NTUyQTk2Mjc0RUQyNDg1NzM0MEVCNEYw QzhFNEU3NjBBRTkwOEMACgkQ8Mjk52CukIznKgCfff4Hh8ieixnv3h315c9wRjZR bMsAnihPU2nrDS7UD9GSKneaGxlkiuOk =NNix -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --llBeec5N7BOQsUhD6uKMOVIdqPB9H2qcK-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 2 20:35:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 159474E1 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 20:35:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wbe@psr.com) Received: from psr.com (mail.psr.com [67.212.42.216]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B208426F8 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 20:35:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from psr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by psr.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r92K7nAT072672; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 16:07:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wbe@psr.com) Received: (from wbe@localhost) by psr.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r92K7nV2072671; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 16:07:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wbe) Message-Id: <201310022007.r92K7nV2072671@psr.com> Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 16:07 EDT From: Winston Subject: Where is pkg repository for 9.2-RELEASE (amd64)? To: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 20:35:54 -0000 Summary: Where is the (U.S.) pkg(ng) repository for amd64 9.2-RELEASE (i.e., what's the right URI for PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf)? Things I tried that didn't work: * pkg_add -r pkg didn't create /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf * pkg.conf.sample suggests "http://pkg.freebsd.org/${ABI}/latest", but the host name pkg.freebsd.org does not DNS resolve for me. * URLs using pkgbeta.FreeBSD.org didn't work, and http://pkgbeta.FreeBSD.org/ itself says "Currently this site only contains pkg bootstrap files!" Thanks! -WBE From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 2 20:51:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3164E8A for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 20:51:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from p3plsmtpa07-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa07-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.192.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D222858 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 20:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ethic.thought.org ([209.180.213.209]) by p3plsmtpa07-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with id YLpP1m00K4XeM0101LpQfa; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 13:49:24 -0700 Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 13:49:30 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: firefox: getting back several URL's as tabs? Message-ID: <20131002204929.GA16829@ethic.thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 20:51:01 -0000 Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. Of_Interest: With 27 years of service to the Unix community. guys, well, it just happened again. when I closed an unwanted URL, the other two instances of firefox vanished. I know the Hard way of getting them all back, but does is there an easy way of refilling both browsers? oh, and if there is somewhere I can click to save my bookmarks by-hand, please let me know ---- before my shoulder falls off! thanks in advance, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Twenty-seven years of service to the Unix community. http://www.thought.org/HOPE From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 2 22:06:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340F1EB4 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 22:06:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B70AD2D95 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 22:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r92M6hTQ051786 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 23:06:43 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk r92M6hTQ051786 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/r92M6hTQ051786; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (unprotected policy) Message-ID: <524C98EC.6060204@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 23:06:36 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where is pkg repository for 9.2-RELEASE (amd64)? References: <201310022007.r92K7nV2072671@psr.com> In-Reply-To: <201310022007.r92K7nV2072671@psr.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OGJSwIME1KNIW1gdte6ir6am7lRjQAMJ3" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 22:06:48 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --OGJSwIME1KNIW1gdte6ir6am7lRjQAMJ3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/10/2013 21:07, Winston wrote: > Summary: >=20 > Where is the (U.S.) pkg(ng) repository for amd64 9.2-RELEASE (i.e., > what's the right URI for PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf)? >=20 >=20 > Things I tried that didn't work: >=20 > * pkg_add -r pkg didn't create /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf >=20 > * pkg.conf.sample suggests "http://pkg.freebsd.org/${ABI}/latest", > but the host name pkg.freebsd.org does not DNS resolve for me. >=20 > * URLs using pkgbeta.FreeBSD.org didn't work, and > http://pkgbeta.FreeBSD.org/ itself says > "Currently this site only contains pkg bootstrap files!" Yeah -- and the bootstrap pkg on pkgbeta is severely out of date and has some problems with the up to date DB schema. Use PACKAGESITE=3Dhttp://pkg-test.freebsd.org/pkg-test-${ABI}/latest That's the kit that will form the official FreeBSD package repository; it just lacks the crypto bits for signing the packages, which is why it's calling itself 'pkg-test' Oh -- there isn't an A record in the DNS for pkg-test.freebsd.org -- look up a SRV record for _http._tcp.pkg-test.freebsd.org instead. (Yes, this is counter to RFC 2616. https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/issues/550 There are moves afoot to change to a new set of URL schemes: pkg+http://, pkg+https://, pkg+ssh:// etc. but these are still under development) Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --OGJSwIME1KNIW1gdte6ir6am7lRjQAMJ3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iKYEARECAGYFAlJMmPJfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEI1NTUyQTk2Mjc0RUQyNDg1NzM0MEVCNEYw QzhFNEU3NjBBRTkwOEMACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzlHgCffwnWkDE3uv0iTCxEdhB3duTH PTIAn2NHK5qyO5Hzzgv4qah+YGKINBEh =Ph7t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OGJSwIME1KNIW1gdte6ir6am7lRjQAMJ3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 3 08:59:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F80C958 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 08:59:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shope.shi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com (mail-pa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 491012E1E for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 08:59:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id bj1so2317185pad.28 for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 01:59:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :thread-index:content-language; bh=ntGtwFPXWg3hUbBN/jgIM5CHf4DBUQ1PimeHXgcvWHI=; b=cY+Lpn3iUnie9REJwSm5qGTasmh509YN5MKYJBYwM3z4ZsKyQAlOIN9oWP6PhPp0B8 CmTFtTMdPpEMTGv+ROiDMOkjM4mkFuaPTzirHHfB7SDXKkOreDAunvEt+CEPBUIkJaPf jQmWWUrjoTGrZcLnPVX5xmMsw8c5bKGLvivJAdw/+M71iMb69WfJTATI+ZBMhnSqMXpm ErGDlxvsL7RFoiNgyZRYXYNAPwAFTE3f2aRd6vk7Y8FfI+c1jnA8VhTcDYEmLmW5fjYl ulpz3i+9ErrdihsDwogjCF+2z3YUwG4BJO8LF/GaUXjv8Eu/Scia3QKcizaAs+WnGLJZ R3ww== X-Received: by 10.68.143.38 with SMTP id sb6mr7430689pbb.44.1380790790830; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 01:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 3c1PC ([122.177.82.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ja5sm6858879pbc.14.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Oct 2013 01:59:50 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ryan" To: Subject: 1st page in Google Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:29:50 +0530 Message-ID: <524d3206.45c6440a.496a.ffff86bd@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac7AFuqsKrXnK9W5Q5ahQEv1WMH+9A== Content-Language: en-us Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 08:59:51 -0000 =20 =20 Hi, I Am Ryan, ( SEO Marketing Strategist ) =20 You want to get your website in front of as many people as possible. Our = SEO services give you long-lasting results that extend beyond a quick, = temporary boost in rankings. We=92ll help you achieve better rankings, increased traffic, and more sales in the long run. =20 Our SEO consultants will talk with you about your business goals. = They=92ll research your industry, your competition, and the keywords you want to target. They=92ll provide you with regular, detailed updates on your = website=92s rankings and traffic. =20 =20 we have discounted offers $150 for 10-15 keywords SEO with Mainstreethost includes: =FC Initial Website Consultation =FC Keyword Research =FC Meta Data Alterations =FC Front Page Content Consultation =FC Internal Text Link Modifications =FC Content Writing (additional charges may apply) =FC Setup and Implementation of Google Analytics / Google Webmaster = Tools =FC Setup and Implementation of Bing Webmaster Tools =FC Ranking / Status Reports We=92re working with small, medium-sized, and large businesses right = now, helping them improve their rankings and delivering them real, measurable results. =20 Let me know if you are interested and I=92ll present you with a proposal = that would not only improve sales of your company but also brand your = products. NOTE: Kindly let me know your phone number and best timing along with = time zone to give you a call to discuss more. =20 Thanks & Regards Ryan ( SEO Marketing Strategist ) ---------------------------- =20 =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 3 09:00:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED6EA00 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 09:00:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from clickmediaseoservices@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pd0-x243.google.com (mail-pd0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::243]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3900D2E27 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 09:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f195.google.com with SMTP id w10so554736pde.10 for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 02:00:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :thread-index:content-language; bh=Mib1atABANLdgcDuAxgdHCIzdPOdgqha5+hl21F7ECY=; b=bb14MSoN5SA5rQUkxjUqayW6ZMoBuN2ycxvufuDM7hbtAmHorzDrxEEfNT98rckG74 OQw5xfbKH/iZ+XPIocmARnLJbTMIzYJsZ359tL4Ft5f5S3OtjeI2G+TOeomsCqBSpqN9 iOjXJXXDN+T9Cf8ADYGwOPAcLWVcWPdgKzsh7W4l/7TU90VILZMsEG0YG7nCnpdy/vGH DtMofPrWxOSEV4KhiR1celwazM/yFZUif3YlMNQAyZ/K6JdffAcASr4lPUq226ATgx7J suFozY9EWtqtXBWFzkEhwILocbIcregkMr4rh57RUkc5K95qZrP8MkRE5xpnxjR4tY/M j0ig== X-Received: by 10.66.158.72 with SMTP id ws8mr8120006pab.39.1380790797858; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 01:59:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 3c1PC ([122.177.82.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ab4sm6808655pbc.43.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Oct 2013 01:59:57 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ryan" To: Subject: 1st page in Google Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:29:57 +0530 Message-ID: <080501cec016$f0bb18d0$d2314a70$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac7AFu8Fgg4j8FnXSLWyZiBJhg7ASQ== Content-Language: en-us Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 09:00:01 -0000 =20 =20 Hi, I Am Ryan, ( SEO Marketing Strategist ) =20 You want to get your website in front of as many people as possible. Our = SEO services give you long-lasting results that extend beyond a quick, = temporary boost in rankings. We=92ll help you achieve better rankings, increased traffic, and more sales in the long run. =20 Our SEO consultants will talk with you about your business goals. = They=92ll research your industry, your competition, and the keywords you want to target. They=92ll provide you with regular, detailed updates on your = website=92s rankings and traffic. =20 =20 we have discounted offers $150 for 10-15 keywords SEO with Mainstreethost includes: =FC Initial Website Consultation =FC Keyword Research =FC Meta Data Alterations =FC Front Page Content Consultation =FC Internal Text Link Modifications =FC Content Writing (additional charges may apply) =FC Setup and Implementation of Google Analytics / Google Webmaster = Tools =FC Setup and Implementation of Bing Webmaster Tools =FC Ranking / Status Reports We=92re working with small, medium-sized, and large businesses right = now, helping them improve their rankings and delivering them real, measurable results. =20 Let me know if you are interested and I=92ll present you with a proposal = that would not only improve sales of your company but also brand your = products. NOTE: Kindly let me know your phone number and best timing along with = time zone to give you a call to discuss more. =20 Thanks & Regards Ryan ( SEO Marketing Strategist ) ---------------------------- =20 =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 3 13:11:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F35FDE2 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:11:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlopmart@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x22c.google.com (mail-wg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D31232395 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:11:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b13so2392019wgh.11 for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 06:11:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8zTyQ1rzL1WmNb/4GyTuU0MqBXQD96R24WZGjwrBfXo=; b=LoUXWgyWPf0lxOA/T+CF8skBd/TYp/X3VEe+sMMy8ChQxwEtMHj6UH/N43cnN7zyYJ Awuk9U9AMFlEWvQc74ZrZYi2jTr8ZEBMrZwuJ5Fpo+dwDI2G8v6jfJqSGxxINP509eYr YfcVIGhQg6rcUQ40FF5+qS+CCQD9DQ26djxjjXU3GUG87ELsSrj0Q5KVAAhfTXLg3YRX PiIUg+lNOyzOw5a3pzm08sCRZQbVxauvDIhPMKvfWt8vE5OUHsgf/cn9jzHYcFEG6q+9 uOTD4IV9JH4mwz28HonEw9gkX4TBTGhElMUMkW9jnstbD831ME0DtE9Eph/Yc6UWPu2k qb1Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.23.8 with SMTP id i8mr1064930wjf.68.1380805862162; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 06:11:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.170.198 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 06:11:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:11:02 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Perl packages fails to build From: "C. L. Martinez" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:11:04 -0000 Hi all, Using freebsd 9.2 amd64 and poudriere, perl fails to build: /bin/mkdir -p /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14/BSDPAN/. install -o root -g wheel -m 444 /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/BSDPAN-20111107/BSDPAN.pm /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14/BSDPAN/BSDPAN.pm /bin/mkdir -p /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14/BSDPAN/BSDPAN install -o root -g wheel -m 444 /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/BSDPAN-20111107/BSDPAN/Override.pm /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14/BSDPAN/BSDPAN/Override.pm /bin/mkdir -p /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14/BSDPAN/. install -o root -g wheel -m 444 /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/BSDPAN-20111107/Config.pm /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14/BSDPAN/Config.pm /bin/mkdir -p /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14/BSDPAN/ExtUtils install -o root -g wheel -m 444 /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/BSDPAN-20111107/ExtUtils/MM_Unix.pm /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14/BSDPAN/ExtUtils/MM_Unix.pm /bin/mkdir -p /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14/BSDPAN/ExtUtils install -o root -g wheel -m 444 /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/BSDPAN-20111107/ExtUtils/MakeMaker.pm /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14/BSDPAN/ExtUtils/MakeMaker.pm /bin/mkdir -p /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14/BSDPAN/ExtUtils install -o root -g wheel -m 444 /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/BSDPAN-20111107/ExtUtils/Packlist.pm /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14/BSDPAN/ExtUtils/Packlist.pm ====> Compressing man pages ===> Installing for perl-5.14.4_1 ===> Checking if lang/perl5.14 already installed ===> Registering installation for perl-5.14.4_1 pkg-static: lstat(/wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14/man/man3/): No such file or directory pkg-static: lstat(/wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14/man/): No such file or directory pkg-static: lstat(/wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14/mach/sys/): No such file or directory pkg-static: lstat(/wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14/mach/machine/): No such file or directory pkg-static: lstat(/wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14/mach/auto/): No such file or directory pkg-static: lstat(/wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/perl5.14/work/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14/auto/): No such file or directory *** [fake-pkg] Error code 74 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.14. ===> Cleaning for perl-5.14.4_1 build of /usr/ports/lang/perl5.14 ended at Thu Oct 3 13:07:33 UTC 2013 build time: 00:05:13 Any idea?? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 3 13:39:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF01D1DD for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:39:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrisikeshsahu@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-x235.google.com (mail-vb0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EE0F2582 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:39:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id i3so1586297vbh.12 for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 06:39:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=fD6huAexjdihRxA6lcZVXD9pZMOa2cMyCyogaYXXOE0=; b=IoI/HARs/NqqWHKv7a5KHj0V81kGSxw65TSCDCwF5t6MiQD4O15ObBYB5cIeOPcLZR WMz2KOLiSo4lX/Tv45Yq6CzhJDlq3IaH4HU4Jw+MLEMET1/a6/2MF7ZUwKt/lvvLROZQ IGoMtPMzEOaYgxdMLk0VRwh46S12bzvmh0sSp0L0ICX+FlOaKgnR7NxQtQAAZoZ7iYqF D/336xsCTgxQrRLwHy5YFXR9H3DyyKW2MD64A0eyZSNPrQ1OTNUY3roLejjm2kKjg0T0 GzMGZB5X9p0QBy1n1YkseagzuoxCAfOsT9MO/QimXeb3ECxy84Z2nRz2UEFz2zmpZhwT Ts5w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.10.194 with SMTP id q2mr7424679vcq.2.1380807542545; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 06:39:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.26.17 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 06:39:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:09:02 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: FreeBSD routing problem From: hrkesh sahu To: "Julian H. Stacey" Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=001a11c3b94413b65104e7d64fd8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Polytropon , FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:39:03 -0000 --001a11c3b94413b65104e7d64fd8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, I am facing a routing issue for the Interoperability 1.5 topology. Please find the attachment of the exact topology map. As per test setup =96 =D8 Configured REF-Router2 NOT to transmit Router Advertisement on Network1. But REF-Router2 is able to transmit Router Advertisement on Network2 with 2001:db8:ffff:3::/64 . =D8 Configured a static route on TAR-RouterD ( ubuntu) Indicating REF-Router2=92s Link local address as the next hop for the Network2 . =D8 But Ref-Router Not able to routes between Network1 and Network2. Due = to this ICMPv6 request from TAR-router to the global address of REF-Host2 is not working. There is no reply for this ICMPv6 request. =D8 Same when I try to transmit ICMPv6 Echo request from REF-HOST2 to glob= al address of TAR-HOST1( Prefix of TAR-RouterD), no ICMPv6 reply. =D8 Within Network1 , nodes are able to communicate. But when I try to communicate Netwrok2 from Network1, it is not working. Could you please suggest tell me if I am missing something to route the traffic on REF-Router ? I suspect , as there is no Route Advertisement on Interface1 of the Ref-Router, it is not able to route the traffic between the interfaces. Please help me to find this solution. Regards --001a11c3b94413b65104e7d64fd8-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 3 14:36:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9917CF for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:36:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3A7928C2 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:36:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail.dweimer.local [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r93EaAsJ000873 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 09:36:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 09:36:10 -0500 From: dweimer To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: 9.1 - 9.2 upgrade, clang question Organization: dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Message-ID: X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 14:36:19 -0000 When upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 using source, is there any benefit to rebuilding twice, due to the clang version change? So that the second buildworld/kernel is done from the updated clang 3.3, instead of the clang 3.1 that was in FreeBSD 9.1? -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 3 16:08:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21477EA4 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 16:08:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x22f.google.com (mail-lb0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1DA22E2A for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 16:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id y6so2185635lbh.20 for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 09:08:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OS1ff34Lwj0vIraPH3X20h0DLxOTyJC+278HyUWNEYs=; b=gtW6bj2ZMy/wF1nv9VkWxuLksQ5xPWCZf9X3AG3zgDGo7nuK6to+cZiYmI2g095TtY 49CregYOOQ9WMhTNSyrq85Gy4Qr2H1xpUMLS8D8D0K+B9L7XdoZAvDtv/TW5a8jTQv06 Ho/sBdzsBi8NkFnIlMAXcpJuh2WOTiXv09JTRa2+HhK2gVPx9RkuEwG/plA4W8kOkV7E H9Zef5hbZapX2LxekBAuJ8SAaMwCppdjG8CJUS8+QBdJNvb5S3O3WP/AIxi+5URUDkIW r6Wa/aFDeCBvqh2kVDRzrCRXBGcIjJlGzdML8uCvbF+MKhjAKZx8uKuG79TRaNwIXz9D zRLg== X-Received: by 10.112.50.72 with SMTP id a8mr1650060lbo.50.1380816490760; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 09:08:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.128] (mau.donbass.com. [92.242.127.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id kx1sm6858811lac.7.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Oct 2013 09:08:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <524D9668.4080605@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 19:08:08 +0300 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dweimer@dweimer.net, FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: 9.1 - 9.2 upgrade, clang question References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 16:08:13 -0000 03.10.2013 17:36, dweimer wrote: > When upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 using source, is there any benefit to > rebuilding twice, due to the clang version change? So that the second > buildworld/kernel is done from the updated clang 3.3, instead of the > clang 3.1 that was in FreeBSD 9.1? During the buildworld first new compiler is built and then this new compiler is used to build everything else. There may be other reasons to double build though... Maybe after cleaning system with `make delete-old`/`make delete-old-libs`? -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 3 16:08:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F69F3F for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 16:08:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michipili@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-x22e.google.com (mail-ee0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D52D92E39 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 16:08:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f46.google.com with SMTP id c13so1220671eek.33 for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 09:08:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3rB5ERjejg9msxt+tKluI38gVzJZlHFcNpGW5CpXbZY=; b=q+mJu8Tl6axm0h5mCI7zZOc289Tp598MZxNwXQ+QBRLzjclPC8/VRKQWOGTAkV6x1y pJKwlVHTkZpwEa1+FZ1797pGn4eVqMiJgaOjfyElQkOQFwXwNh4Jg8cSOR1qfeoyPM7m pmzUNMK4e6oLdBmX1N8P1HiNIhLMIo4zCeThlxd1pe6D/dVVLBu+Z7ebJJJEkmHcPqmB +++apb84dZp5TafODua5gTIhjFKPo46UWKXCHL4+lfoVnhyINfdB8A8P55DhAnbaWP3Y Gj/3mjiUuvYqzm8EswV9XxL92EgtSZNDQyW8ooIcm+T3hwTUBgN3XIne5I65KM1vSU+e iD9Q== X-Received: by 10.14.183.130 with SMTP id q2mr13870389eem.5.1380816519286; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 09:08:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from llea.celt.neu (xdsl-89-0-78-230.netcologne.de. [89.0.78.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z12sm17351912eev.6.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Oct 2013 09:08:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <524D9684.6060905@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 18:08:36 +0200 From: Michael User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/24.0 SeaMonkey/2.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Tillman , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Soekris for a Trac server References: <524A6A26.30903@gmail.com> <1380656055.18443.YahooMailNeo@web165001.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1380656055.18443.YahooMailNeo@web165001.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 16:08:41 -0000 Hello Bill, thank you for your answer! Bill Tillman wrote: > The way technology has moved on these days I would approach this from a > completely different manner. Soekris makes some cool little boxes, but the > last time I looked they still had I486 cpu's...today may be different, probably > is. My point is that with computers so cheap these days why not just use > a box, sans the drives and do a diskless boot from one of your FreeBSD > servers...or better yet, setup another FreeBSD server using VM. It doesn't > make sense to buy a box with VM technology so freely available. Of course you are right that virtualisation is the cheapest way to go. But this my actual setup and I am considering moving it to a physical support because for my uses, I value some of its features (low-noise™ or take-away™). Best regards, Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 3 16:20:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919617F5 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 16:20:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@gmx.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 153EC2F0D for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 16:20:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.63] ([5.56.238.180]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Me5Q2-1VBrqU0rhW-00PvZf for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 18:20:44 +0200 Message-ID: <524D9950.70400@gmx.com> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 18:20:32 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130922 Icedove/17.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman Subject: zfs over geli over zfs (was: Re: zfs flag denoting unclean shutdown?) References: <524C3CF0.8050502@gmx.com> <524C6259.9030609@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <524C6259.9030609@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:T72Wj0iG6T5sOoFRufjOGCZNT+o7umTtNqgAUYQL7oNxmt+bUYf QrrZFAVRtB1C1IF1dzG97FxRcwiPiSYnvynCaaatj+pFtNLaX5E73NP38LJcuyJKoWN259H 7H25BJF+mE7mvgyLSewuWw66qPrAcgEkrHhaUBM/XAoQlYreUZnd0pGdMZM57hwRH8ZrmDk Ru9r7I1VtqklqlkDRHXCA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 16:20:52 -0000 On 10/02/2013 08:13 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 02/10/2013 16:34, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: >> Is there a way to know if a zfs pool had an unclean shutdown? >> An attribute or maybe something during mount time similar to what ufs >> does (WARNING: / was not properly dismounted)? > > Other than looking at the system logs for evidence of an abnormal > shutdown, no. (Absence of anything in the logs is pretty good evidence > for the system falling over pretty hard... Usually something to do with > the power being turned off.) > > However, due to the design of ZFS unclean shutdowns like this are > nowhere near as problematic as on UFS. Basically, you're guaranteed > that what is written on disk is always consistent. You might lose a few > transactions -- essentially the last few seconds of file system activity > -- but that doesn't usually make a great deal of difference after the > system reboots again. Oh, yeah -- absolutely no time will be needed to > be spent cleaning and repairing filesystems: with ZFS, reboot after > crash is as fast as a normal reboot. Thanks Matthew, I realized I should have used a more appropriate subject. I'll explain what my actual goal is:) I am after a really specific use-case and the last minute transactions are important. Using a zpool over geli over a zvol. I'd like to know if during shutdown the kernel flushes all zfs files caches in order so these last minutes transactions won't be lost. The unmounting order is far from obvious (zfs over geli over zfs) and i wonder if such a scheme will succeed. I can't afford losing the last transactions of my home dir every time i shutdown my laptop;) The obvious solution is to create two slices and dedicate a slice to geli. Like this: mypool lives on slice1 myencpool lives on slice2.eli I am after this: mypool lives on slice1 myencpool lives on /dev/zvol/mypool/avolume.eli The second scheme will allow me to have an encypted home and not to pre-allocate space. A quick test showed that it might work... On the other hand conceptually seems like a very bad idea haha. I think I've heard people doing this zfs over geli over zfs before... Thanks for any thoughts, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 3 16:23:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458738CA for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 16:23:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd-mbox@mail.ru) Received: from fallback7.mail.ru (fallback7.mail.ru [94.100.176.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD302F3A for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 16:23:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp43.i.mail.ru (smtp43.i.mail.ru [94.100.177.103]) by fallback7.mail.ru (mPOP.Fallback_MX) with ESMTP id 8033BE62075C for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 20:23:17 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ru; s=mail2; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=CWiQ7ZmlbX/jBIQ49yH+AsMI4RE5NizZnT0m2Y4E4hA=; b=APpKiRvE0gXeTaYdLLmgknanlxdy0BZZLQSACowlgzoAvwfFS0QAqcx2N4V6+eur7W+9HKJZQbzdLhRRhw8fEfMzbBuaByPFDSBfM5b9g9DsQeaMo789E7LBk2OVdzdAxoptxDmg0xcXAuwg69rGcR6QXSoeWspi52CfbI5sdqI=; Received: from [212.100.132.202] (port=51887 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by smtp43.i.mail.ru with esmtpa (envelope-from ) id 1VRlgD-0005r5-4O for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 20:23:09 +0400 Message-ID: <524D99EB.5060508@mail.ru> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 20:23:07 +0400 From: fbsd-mbox User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Problem with IPSec setup Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected X-Mras: Ok X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 16:23:25 -0000 Hello. Does anyone have a clue why kernel always directs ESP packets via default route (or default gateway in FIB 0), even if there are other FIBs with per-interface routes? I'm stuck with the gateway, which is connected to 2 ISPs and the necessity to configure IPSec tunnels on both external channels. Using setfib(8) I've managed to successfully establish an IKE session via both channels (using a separate instance of racoon per each channel), but the tunnel is just not working. Using IPFW's setfib option does not make any difference. Is this a bug or I'm missing some point? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 3 16:31:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4849B9E3 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 16:31:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michipili@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-x236.google.com (mail-ee0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D43E42FA9 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 16:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id e53so1242738eek.13 for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 09:31:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jg169O6Js0rerVaNb0k3jUCJ6Gwp8UatbszmiduZgSY=; b=A0IPQLAXMnaXnG+Zgod5p1RrSIpBp9LWb5+Xzrr2NA9iwKjr20nc49fNCk+LB1EOMi t3VBFu86saGhEwyDN5bjouAtTNgX98R6UcPj7udDJzCT9liFT9nrg082SMgS+f3l+VMo juCfjmWaDbhHhdJNCzkTzAHQF9eLSoxsUbIaq4PjdJPZY2381dOWWO4o7bia60+ygv05 r+uIbSzZPRr3D9rJ9nk0cfHr/u1qfUyBwt7R5I/XCUtk1G2iBZ6MvsVlT7P2uKw6aTXd eQuMLf8c8c5RYMKeJkruQhdIeH6zKaqtV4N0WDUzsph3lbHs/noSzfLSh0ilVD1LFtyN ukOw== X-Received: by 10.14.3.9 with SMTP id 9mr4288833eeg.72.1380817876218; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 09:31:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from llea.celt.neu (xdsl-89-0-173-251.netcologne.de. [89.0.173.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r48sm17541920eev.14.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Oct 2013 09:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <524D9BC2.5010202@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 18:30:58 +0200 From: Michael User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/24.0 SeaMonkey/2.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Levine , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Soekris for a Trac server References: <20131001195446.68658.qmail@joyce.lan> In-Reply-To: <20131001195446.68658.qmail@joyce.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: btillman99@yahoo.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 16:31:18 -0000 Hi John, John Levine wrote: > Dunno about Soekris, but I'm very happy with one of these > mini-box systems that cost about $250 with a 60GB SSD disk: > > http://www.mini-box.com/MiniPC-Value-Systems thank you for your detailed answer and useful suggestion, I will probably look for a similar product! Regards, Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 3 17:33:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C39CD422 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 17:33:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51726231F for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 17:33:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBF890.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.203.248.144]) (authenticated bits=128) by land.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r93HXGYe035675; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 17:33:16 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r93HX4it004780; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:33:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost.js.berklix.net [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r93HWkSP011234; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:32:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201310031732.r93HWkSP011234@fire.js.berklix.net> To: hrkesh sahu Subject: Re: FreeBSD routing problem From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Thu, 03 Oct 2013 19:09:02 +0530." Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 19:32:46 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: Polytropon , FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 17:33:20 -0000 > From: hrkesh sahu > Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:09:02 +0530 > To: "Julian H. Stacey" > Cc: Polytropon , > FreeBSD questions Hi, No idea why it was To: me. > Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I dislike MS & windows & quoted-printable, > Content-Type: application/msword; name="1.5.VendorD.Topology.doc" > Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="1.5.VendorD.Topology.doc" MS excrement not accepted. http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/std/no_ms_format.txt Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". Send plain text. No quoted-printable, HTML, base64, multipart/alternative. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 3 17:49:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1F99DA for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 17:49:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBDF23D5 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 17:49:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.177.216.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r93HnX4Q037802 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 10:49:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) From: Doug Hardie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: 9.1 - 9.2 upgrade Message-Id: Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 10:49:33 -0700 To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 17:49:40 -0000 I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a = custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update completed. = However, I noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been updated. The = first entry still says: 9.1-RELEASE. Is this correct? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 3 18:06:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD12FCD; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 18:06:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vmiller@verisign.com) Received: from exprod6og106.obsmtp.com (exprod6og106.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB98724E5; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 18:06:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from peregrine.verisign.com ([216.168.239.74]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob106.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUk2yD+/vwLK8eyvhSIqX/5Bnq0NGXJZX@postini.com; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 11:06:08 PDT Received: from BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexchm01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.255]) by peregrine.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id r93I66xP013461 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:06:06 -0400 Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 14:06:06 -0400 From: "Miller, Vincent (Rick)" To: FreeBSD Questions , "freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-announce@freebsd.org" Subject: vBSDcon Is Coming: Oct 25 - 27, 2013 in Herndon, VA Thread-Topic: vBSDcon Is Coming: Oct 25 - 27, 2013 in Herndon, VA Thread-Index: AQHOwGM6j9y18pn34UikBeclD0ZU6g== Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 18:06:05 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.7.130812 x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 18:06:08 -0000 vBSDcon is a BSD-related conference occurring *this month* from 25th =96 27= th, just 3 weeks away in the DC Metropolitan area. At a cost of only USD$7= 5, the time to register for this event is now! vBSDcon has an amazing list= of speakers from the FreeBSD and OpenBSD communities, but participation fr= om all sectors of the community is encouraged. Our list of speakers and th= eir respective topics can be reviewed at http://www.vbsdcon.com/. In addition to plenary speakers, vBSDcon will also have lightning talks. T= he topics for these talks is chosen by you! When attendees register for vB= SDcon at http://www.vbsdcon.com/, you are given the opportunity to identify= subjects and areas of interest to you. This will be translated into a lig= htning talk to be given by one of our attendees. Be sure not to miss this event hosted by Verisign! This is your opportunit= y to come together with others in the BSD communities for a series of round= table discussions, educational sessions, best practice conversations, and e= xclusive networking opportunities. Registrations will be accepted now through October 23rd at http://www.vbsdc= on.com/. We look forward to seeing you all there! -- Vincent (Rick) Miller Systems Engineer vmiller@verisign.com t: 703-948-4395 m: 703-581-3068 12061 Bluemont Way, Reston, VA 20190 http://www.vbsdcon.com http://www.verisigninc.com =93This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of= the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain informa= tion that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt f= rom disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as attorney work = product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified tha= t any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is= strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, notify se= nder immediately and delete this message immediately.=94 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 3 18:28:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37CC1C5D for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 18:28:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x233.google.com (mail-la0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7A6926D4 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 18:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f51.google.com with SMTP id es20so2271664lab.24 for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 11:28:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=oDwMfOKlCRoMu5Mw8Ndk/GYvaDb+m1vvvlbjyror02Q=; b=PX0mKb42XkhdgACNdoRE6jiGqswfqHuAlc2+ya2YRqTNbbP76o4pxZ3Ky5pbwo3JDH SbfcNzmcKM0A9QpQ0JBVnaOCSnpSd7AZAFaZFjvEbZ6ZE/WbmAnvKyByZ5pNz/HHfrUR sEPmGgkkmcauJetTR3JSw4Ll7Fim/giIqZyTDkDOyC1148wD+F3sYLh/HQavfBg+D9rR Z54rKWm7pAqELy/AsyYl9U/UjCIu4ZKE92GciCoKNMBn2hFYVgk3lqKwhbVuW8nm1uYg DnNOiLpxnsz5nxMgHY8lEKIH9YpCQjnWBxn3kvqCIQXEyZumDU0sv7UJ2+WrerpnlEbx rzgA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.87.143 with SMTP id ay15mr8083285lab.2.1380824881694; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 11:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.157.129 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:28:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <444n9114v5.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <44d2np1p5k.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <444n9114v5.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:28:01 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: # portmaster -r pixman fails with !#/bin/sh list too long From: Antonio Olivares To: Lowell Gilbert Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Romain_Tarti=E8re?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 18:28:04 -0000 On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Antonio Olivares writes: > >> I tried your advice with the -R option, it worked, but for only pixman >> the other ports that depend on it don't get rebuilt :( >> >> I try to use -x 'texlive-*' but it does not work :( >> I get >> >> Could not execute shell >> "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1192: warning "/usr/bin/awk >> '/^#define[[:blank:]]....FreeBSD_version/ {print $3} >> > /usr/local/sbin/portmaster: rm: Argument list too long >> >> and it justs sits there. Out of 3 machines only 1 is working because >> I overlooked the pixman update entry in /usr/src/UPDATING :( >> >> Please advice me as to how to get the desktop working again on these >> machines. I did not want to shoot myself in the foot but I did so :( > > Try the '-R' again; it may get a bit farther each time. > > You can always recover by removing some of the ports and reinstalling > them after the remaining ports are updated. You're going to have to > rebuild a huge number of ports anyway, so this is not very different > from using portmaster on everything. > > Good luck. Have tried that, but it rebuilds pixman, but then X bombs out blurting out messages that lib....pixman.so is missing :( I have tried to remove print/texlive-scheme-full; removed it, but then run portmaster -R pixman, and portmaster -r pixman and the running of it stops with message that !#/bin/sh .. argument too long and comes up with texlive-?????-?????-_1 or similar. Have not been successful in fixing this issue. I have 2 machines working and 2 not working because of this. I am running out of ideas. Is there another way to fix this issue manually, i.e, going to /usr/ports/x11/pixman and rebuilding it there or have to go one by one? Thanks for your advice and suggestions but I am not getting there :( Best Regards, Antonio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 3 18:48:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 180F58FD for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 18:48:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E434F280C for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 18:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.177.216.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r93Im7TO039202 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:48:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: 9.1 - 9.2 upgrade From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:48:08 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 18:48:08 -0000 On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote: > I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a = custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update completed. = However, I noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been updated. The = first entry still says: 9.1-RELEASE. Is this correct? Well, it just got worse - The last reboot now fails: I am using a = remote console and it shows: --> Press a key on the console to reboot <-- Rebooting... Consoles: internal video/keyboard serial port =20 BIOS drive A: is disk0 BIOS drive C: is disk1 BIOS 639kB/2087360kB available memory FreeBSD/x86 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1 (doug@zool.lafn.org, Thu Oct 3 04:23:13 PDT 2013) Can't work out which disk we are booting from. Guessed BIOS device 0xffffffff not found by probes, defaulting to disk0: panic: free: guard1 fail @ 0x7f481ed0 from = /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/loader/../../common/module.c:1004 --> Press a key on the console to reboot <-- I can enter a string as it doesn't try to reboot again till the return = is entered. I've tried b disk1, but it still only tries disk0. The = system rebooted fine after the reboot after make kernel. Mergemaster = didn't seem to affect anything dealing with boot. Don't know what make = delete-old does but the descriptions lead me to not believe it could = cause this. This system is on the other side of LA from me so its a = major trip timewise. Any ideas how this can be recovered remotely?= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 3 18:56:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0DA4F42 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 18:56:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BFD32898 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 18:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id r93IUY3k017616; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 12:30:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <524DB7CA.5040206@dreamchaser.org> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 12:30:34 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Kline Subject: Re: firefox: getting back several URL's as tabs? References: <20131002204929.GA16829@ethic.thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20131002204929.GA16829@ethic.thought.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Thu, 03 Oct 2013 12:30:34 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 18:56:27 -0000 On 10/02/13 14:49, Gary Kline wrote: > well, it just happened again. when I closed an unwanted URL, the > other two instances of firefox vanished. I know the Hard way of > getting them all back, but does is there an easy way of refilling > both browsers? oh, and if there is somewhere I can click to save > my bookmarks by-hand, please let me know ---- before my shoulder > falls off! Usually, if it crashes, just starting up will do it. It should ask about restoring the previous session, or at least mine did the last time (quite a while ago) To save and restore bookmarks: Bookmarks/Show All Bookmarks In the window that appears, check out the "Import and Backup..." menu item. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 3 18:58:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75978173 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 18:58:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3688728B5 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 18:58:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail.dweimer.local [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r93IwoQH008783 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:58:50 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:58:50 -0500 From: dweimer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9.1 - 9.2 upgrade Organization: dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <43c4ff2f2c09059a7382ef11a4febde9@dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0000 On 10/03/2013 1:48 pm, Doug Hardie wrote: > On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote: > >> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a >> custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update >> completed. However, I noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been >> updated. The first entry still says: 9.1-RELEASE. Is this correct? > > Well, it just got worse - The last reboot now fails: I am using a > remote console and it shows: > > --> Press a key on the console to reboot <-- > Rebooting... > Consoles: internal video/keyboard serial port > BIOS drive A: is disk0 > BIOS drive C: is disk1 > BIOS 639kB/2087360kB available memory > > FreeBSD/x86 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1 > (doug@zool.lafn.org, Thu Oct 3 04:23:13 PDT 2013) > Can't work out which disk we are booting from. > Guessed BIOS device 0xffffffff not found by probes, defaulting to > disk0: > > panic: free: guard1 fail @ 0x7f481ed0 from > /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/loader/../../common/module.c:1004 > --> Press a key on the console to reboot <-- > > > I can enter a string as it doesn't try to reboot again till the return > is entered. I've tried b disk1, but it still only tries disk0. The > system rebooted fine after the reboot after make kernel. Mergemaster > didn't seem to affect anything dealing with boot. Don't know what > make delete-old does but the descriptions lead me to not believe it > could cause this. This system is on the other side of LA from me so > its a major trip timewise. Any ideas how this can be recovered > remotely? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I wonder if your source update didn't correctly download, mine starts with: Updating Information for FreeBSD current users ...[snip]... Items affecting the ports and packages system can be found in /usr/ports/UPDATING. Please read that file before running portupgrade. 20130705: hastctl(8)'s `status' command output changed to terse one-liner format. Scripts using this should switch to `list' command or be rewritten. 20130618: Fix a bug that allowed a tracing process (e.g. gdb) to write ...[snip]... 20121218: With the addition of auditdistd(8), a new auditdistd user is now depended on during installworld. "mergemaster -p" can be used to add the user prior to installworld, as documented in the handbook. 20121205: 9.1-RELEASE. ...[snip]... I haven't a clue how to fix your non booting system short of booting off a FreeBSD disc, going to live CD, mounting the filesystems in a temp location and doing a buildworld/kernel over again with correct source tree. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 3 19:13:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09E5551 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907922998 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:13:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.177.216.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r93JBhCV040000 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Oct 2013 12:11:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: 9.1 - 9.2 upgrade From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: <43c4ff2f2c09059a7382ef11a4febde9@dweimer.net> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 12:11:44 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <67F7CF91-3D31-4EDB-8BC2-CDC36201AE23@lafn.org> References: <43c4ff2f2c09059a7382ef11a4febde9@dweimer.net> To: dweimer@dweimer.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 19:13:04 -0000 On 3 October 2013, at 11:58, dweimer wrote: > On 10/03/2013 1:48 pm, Doug Hardie wrote: >> On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote: >>> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses = a custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update = completed. However, I noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been = updated. The first entry still says: 9.1-RELEASE. Is this correct? >> Well, it just got worse - The last reboot now fails: I am using a >> remote console and it shows: >> --> Press a key on the console to reboot <-- >> Rebooting... >> Consoles: internal video/keyboard serial port >> BIOS drive A: is disk0 >> BIOS drive C: is disk1 >> BIOS 639kB/2087360kB available memory >> FreeBSD/x86 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1 >> (doug@zool.lafn.org, Thu Oct 3 04:23:13 PDT 2013) >> Can't work out which disk we are booting from. >> Guessed BIOS device 0xffffffff not found by probes, defaulting to = disk0: >> panic: free: guard1 fail @ 0x7f481ed0 from >> /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/loader/../../common/module.c:1004 >> --> Press a key on the console to reboot <-- >> I can enter a string as it doesn't try to reboot again till the = return >> is entered. I've tried b disk1, but it still only tries disk0. The >> system rebooted fine after the reboot after make kernel. Mergemaster >> didn't seem to affect anything dealing with boot. Don't know what >> make delete-old does but the descriptions lead me to not believe it >> could cause this. This system is on the other side of LA from me so >> its a major trip timewise. Any ideas how this can be recovered >> remotely? >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 > I wonder if your source update didn't correctly download, mine starts = with: >=20 > Updating Information for FreeBSD current users > ...[snip]... > Items affecting the ports and packages system can be found in > /usr/ports/UPDATING. Please read that file before running = portupgrade. >=20 > 20130705: > hastctl(8)'s `status' command output changed to terse one-liner = format. > Scripts using this should switch to `list' command or be = rewritten. >=20 > 20130618: > Fix a bug that allowed a tracing process (e.g. gdb) to write > ...[snip]... > 20121218: > With the addition of auditdistd(8), a new auditdistd user is = now > depended on during installworld. "mergemaster -p" can be used = to add > the user prior to installworld, as documented in the handbook. >=20 > 20121205: > 9.1-RELEASE. > ...[snip]... >=20 > I haven't a clue how to fix your non booting system short of booting = off a FreeBSD disc, going to live CD, mounting the filesystems in a temp = location and doing a buildworld/kernel over again with correct source = tree. I have been using freebsd-update for quite awhile now and this is the = first time it has failed. However, I am not convinced the kernel is = bad. It never gets to the point of trying to load the kernel. = Something has failed in the bootstrap process itself and I have not = figured out what is the right thing to enter at that prompt. Being = on-site is not a viable alternative=85 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 3 21:16:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B0A5DD for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 21:16:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87C34201C for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 21:16:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r93LGBOw090535 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 22:16:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk r93LGBOw090535 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/r93LGBOw090535; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (unprotected policy) Message-ID: <524DDE9B.1080801@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 22:16:11 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs over geli over zfs References: <524C3CF0.8050502@gmx.com> <524C6259.9030609@FreeBSD.org> <524D9950.70400@gmx.com> In-Reply-To: <524D9950.70400@gmx.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a17K2aSAteCGFFUq3EwKQDDKIFkGn8MWo" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 21:16:17 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --a17K2aSAteCGFFUq3EwKQDDKIFkGn8MWo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/10/2013 17:20, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > I am after a really specific use-case and the last minute transactions > are important. Using a zpool over geli over a zvol. I'd like to know if= > during shutdown the kernel flushes all zfs files caches in order so > these last minutes transactions won't be lost. The unmounting order is > far from obvious (zfs over geli over zfs) and i wonder if such a scheme= > will succeed. I can't afford losing the last transactions of my home di= r > every time i shutdown my laptop;) If it's a normal clean shutdown, then yes, all pending transactions will be committed to persistent storage. Normally you'ld do something like this by creating geli devices on disk partitions (usually via gpt nowadays), and then creating your zpool from those geli devices. (Typically you'ld just use one geli device in your zvol, which doesn't offer any resilience but avoids potential cryptographical fubars like having two crypttexts known to come from the same plaintext: something that can make it considerably easier to break the encryption. Using a zfs exported as a raw device layered with geli is a good way to get round that, but I think you're probably better off creating a standard UFS on top of the geli partition, rather than creating a second layer of zpool and zfses. (I don't actually know: this is just me guessing without ever having tried this in practice. I'll willingly cede to anyone with actual experience of this sort of thing.) Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --a17K2aSAteCGFFUq3EwKQDDKIFkGn8MWo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iKUEARECAGYFAlJN3ptfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEI1NTUyQTk2Mjc0RUQyNDg1NzM0MEVCNEYw QzhFNEU3NjBBRTkwOEMACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyTGgCWI6X6LC94rgo+RQNtmvcaEaGx hgCeMch1f1At+LoENn2MeD2bfgARNpk= =gAkw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a17K2aSAteCGFFUq3EwKQDDKIFkGn8MWo-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 4 02:13:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2869808 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 02:13:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from html5webdesigning.philip@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-x24f.google.com (mail-oa0-x24f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::24f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 808322DC5 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 02:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f79.google.com with SMTP id i3so6430oag.6 for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 19:13:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=o1ZcrDuNiPombMi35d7vDR9ver5yiXGsKVqx9X+dGC4=; b=QlzoXYwCgBvfZtYcHpQSP+k4Jns9kNO2ZU5os1FZSIYYMb0eJhwkJaB2sM3HRgLBhn 7ty3ZNF+N7p+lmMl1Nfnt8RNJoxMxxFceTuSuCD+twyA6CxCCNM7rkYr5cex/Ft8k/rZ fD28b6y2DFu9Nyl/+KnHpNiNOVZzDCMAZKzis9bq+nNURPwywJGAYlza0A2KMIH2W8at OM3Y7bGp9GRcxgjzy8qZGTRClG13Gn3C/bK6JLAYNRfX6NDjF4O8cofZSxJge7asYBd+ 2zevlg8EFvYYuTU11FJf7Eo3sNtOAiB0ILpS5ZCSqkPnnUDwAFV7FhW6eOKf6Q+wTyoW hY8g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.161.195 with SMTP id u3mr5939399icx.5.1380852821729; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 19:13:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <90e6ba61393aed2dc504e7e0d968@google.com> Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 02:13:41 +0000 Subject: Freebsddiary.org - Integrated marketing help From: Philip Lew To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 02:13:42 -0000

Freebsddiary.org Team,

I thought you might like to know some reasons why you are not getting enough Social Media and Organic search engine traffic for Freebsddiary.org.

1. Your website Freebsddiary.org is not ranking top in Google organic searches for many competitive keyword phrases.

2. Your company is not doing well in most of the Social Media Websites.

3. Your site is not user friendly on mobile devices.

There are many additional improvements that could be made to your website, and if you would like to learn about them, and are curious to know what our working together would involve, then I would be glad to provide you with a detailed analysis in the form of a WEBSITE AUDIT REPORT for FREE.

Our clients consistently tell us that their customers find them because they are at the top of the Google search rankings. Being at the top left of Google (#1- #3 organic positions) is the best thing you can do for your company's website traffic and online reputation. You will be happy to know that, my team is willing to guarantee you 1st page Google ranking for most of your targeted keyword phrases in our six month ongoing campaign.

Sound interesting? Feel free to email us or alternatively you can provide me with your phone number and the best time to call you. I am also available to meet you in person and present you this website audit report.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Best Regards,
Philip Lew
Marketing Consultant

PS I: I am not spamming. I have studied your website and believe I can help with your business promotion. If you still want us to not contact you, you can ignore this email or ask to remove and I will not contact again.

PS II: I found your site using Google search and after having a look over your website I recommend you to implement future technologies such as HTML5 and Responsive Design to make your site more accessible in mobile phone, tablets, desktop etc.

From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 4 06:30:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396CFD35 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 06:30:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C67182836 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 06:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nb981.math (p4FD276C8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.210.118.200]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MSY0i-1VHz300pIy-00S3Fp; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 08:30:42 +0200 Message-ID: <524E6086.5080809@janh.de> Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 08:30:30 +0200 From: Jan Henrik Sylvester User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Antonio Olivares Subject: Re: Re: # portmaster -r pixman fails with !#/bin/sh list too long References: <44d2np1p5k.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <444n9114v5.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:jKZD4PdBrytGG+UuTwAQLSUwdkMqQPzAmAnoKQEH7RX VZansALiGyTuLkS+yo5QYN6ibTZ4KD6N+/fddKZiuL4BaNVNO9 X7KYWQoPJBOi/3VMjlmlLulE5hOujoPQCgKTpBNahKHU29iq67 LQLJuTm44ugeb4HPu7oMaEJE5bVypOJaKitLiYMDcojfsl1FLp XUXvKu9DqJYMDGMMV5n9BSSmaHQn3+Cw2bGBxnTbIkywCs8uXT mpdxXYqs0Z/nweJndfoF3JiuSYEuuENznLUMfEPkvhMffXlsEZ IMg0fFsjPzhCj8g+U9YRkowCuDENvRkEBb2+ae8HIKdeiOTjA= = Cc: questions-list freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 06:30:45 -0000 On 10/03/2013 20:28, Antonio Olivares wrote: > Have tried that, but it rebuilds pixman, but then X bombs out blurting > out messages that lib....pixman.so is missing :( > > I have tried to remove print/texlive-scheme-full; removed it, but then > run portmaster -R pixman, and portmaster -r pixman and the running of > it stops with message that !#/bin/sh .. argument too long and comes up > with texlive-?????-?????-_1 or similar. Have not been successful in > fixing this issue. I have 2 machines working and 2 not working > because of this. I am running out of ideas. Is there another way to > fix this issue manually, i.e, going to /usr/ports/x11/pixman and > rebuilding it there or have to go one by one? Is it vital to use the texlive ports you get via portshaker or could you switch to TEX_DEFAULT=texlive and use the texlive 2012 from official ports (which has a few huge instead of many tiny packages)? (If you want to switch, remove everything starting with texlive, check out a fresh ports tree without portshaker, since there is at least one port with the same name, and install print/texlive-full and maybe print/texlive-docs.) Cheers, Jan Henrik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 4 06:36:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B545F4F for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 06:36:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18BD22877 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 06:36:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.177.216.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r946a42s054784 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 23:36:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: 9.1 - 9.2 upgrade From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 23:36:09 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <62A8B684-0328-42F5-B9E4-D5DF80563D4D@lafn.org> References: To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 06:36:07 -0000 On 3 October 2013, at 11:48, Doug Hardie wrote: >=20 > On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote: >=20 >> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses = a custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update = completed. However, I noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been = updated. The first entry still says: 9.1-RELEASE. Is this correct? >=20 > Well, it just got worse - The last reboot now fails: I am using a = remote console and it shows: >=20 > --> Press a key on the console to reboot <-- > Rebooting... > Consoles: internal video/keyboard serial port =20 > BIOS drive A: is disk0 > BIOS drive C: is disk1 > BIOS 639kB/2087360kB available memory >=20 > FreeBSD/x86 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1 > (doug@zool.lafn.org, Thu Oct 3 04:23:13 PDT 2013) > Can't work out which disk we are booting from. > Guessed BIOS device 0xffffffff not found by probes, defaulting to = disk0: >=20 > panic: free: guard1 fail @ 0x7f481ed0 from = /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/loader/../../common/module.c:1004 > --> Press a key on the console to reboot <-- >=20 >=20 > I can enter a string as it doesn't try to reboot again till the return = is entered. I've tried b disk1, but it still only tries disk0. The = system rebooted fine after the reboot after make kernel. Mergemaster = didn't seem to affect anything dealing with boot. Don't know what make = delete-old does but the descriptions lead me to not believe it could = cause this. This system is on the other side of LA from me so its a = major trip timewise. Any ideas how this can be recovered remotely? Booting off the live CD didn't find anything obviously wrong. I = replaced the kernel with the old one and still the same error. I am = having the drive mailed to me and will work with it here. However, it = appears a new install is going to be required. The old sysinstall had = the capability to skip over the formatting of the disk by just entering = quit. It would then just replace the system components and leave = everything else alone. I don't see any obvious way to do the same thing = with bsdinstall. Is there a way to do that. I don't want to have to = completely rebuild the drive, but just replace the system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 4 10:16:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0149A23E for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 10:16:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1E5E235F for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 10:16:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VS2Qg-0005Gj-KG for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:16:14 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:16:14 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:16:14 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Subject: Re: Soekris for a Trac server Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:15:59 +0200 Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: <524A6A26.30903@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xA8iSRIbUDO8aRn3OAfd2w1lH71rQOecp" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 In-Reply-To: <524A6A26.30903@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 10:16:24 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --xA8iSRIbUDO8aRn3OAfd2w1lH71rQOecp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/10/2013 08:22, Michael wrote: > Also I am bit unsure about the setup I should pick: we are a hand of > users for the service and I would like to know if a 64-MB Ram and a > 166Mhz setup could do, or if I definitely should consider a faster CPU > or more RAM. Given my actual jail based setup, is there an easy way to Definitely aim for a much faster CPU and more RAM. Trac is written in Python, and is pretty slow (unless you are not bothered by pages being generated over a few seconds...). --xA8iSRIbUDO8aRn3OAfd2w1lH71rQOecp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iKYEARECAGYFAlJOlV9fFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDYxNDE4MkQ3ODMwNDAwMDJFRUIzNDhFNUZE MDhENTA2M0RGRjFEMkMACgkQ/QjVBj3/HSwaKgCggRZEajqRqdszb6m+k5inhhuh u9EAn2GtJb0E8lXETn6M6cB7NGLN19Je =yvFi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xA8iSRIbUDO8aRn3OAfd2w1lH71rQOecp-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 4 14:34:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D372B0; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:34:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from varanasisai@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-x231.google.com (mail-vb0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F174211F; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f49.google.com with SMTP id w16so2277891vbb.8 for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 07:34:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mhXtRfBP2DNqw48TywrkxtAVWHwVbQkPtf5e4Cw/eWw=; b=HUUN/SBIPS4A84u4t6BxDO+PHz9BPVS3zXmsWLiXU+u9kMijcg2OnKbPhDqFeOvUMP KKM9iX/FFsRJzMenvPFECk3KYgeUNbbyXe1jkajYDlNzBao29YRgheBPUHxj1rb2Y1xS ps0ypDciYc3CdYBVWslsnhfHczicmyzCeVKZRUv51IKso7SFMrQjx5VGhmWEwIZoQbx1 gtF0cwLVEgOQ0f5HbC5hD0WqFjAjEUpFgVo4fiM5hiXK0TtcoP5CrQqWTgds4yuEVf/s 7IMbWCKuYD+Zc364GuR9Nu2BDvHjL/PWMdcqJuDmPqQyP22ieVR/aP8H1xy6n7g0yLOn zKGg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.196.148 with SMTP id im20mr352677vec.28.1380897249461; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 07:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.30.75 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 07:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 20:04:09 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: gptid's in fstab while installing FreeBSD using ISO From: varanasi sainath To: freebsd-drivers@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, abgupta@microsoft.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 14:34:10 -0000 Hi All, How do I get gptid's as default in fstab while installing using FreeBSD iso file (Virtual,machine installation) ? Is this possible currently? if not how do I achieve this? I use guided partitioning while installing - If I were to tweak in to the source code which files or drivers I should be focusing on? which drivers write the contents of fstab? PS: any reason why we use device names in the place of gptid's as default in fstab. Thanks, Sainath. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 4 16:22:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096BAF25 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 16:22:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACB592747 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 16:22:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail.dweimer.local [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r94GMUvH055104 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 11:22:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 11:22:30 -0500 From: dweimer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9.1 - 9.2 upgrade Organization: dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: <62A8B684-0328-42F5-B9E4-D5DF80563D4D@lafn.org> References: <62A8B684-0328-42F5-B9E4-D5DF80563D4D@lafn.org> Message-ID: <1bdf3856902efd917ab9d489c8b6e751@dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 16:22:39 -0000 On 10/04/2013 1:36 am, Doug Hardie wrote: > On 3 October 2013, at 11:48, Doug Hardie wrote: > >> >> On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote: >> >>> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses >>> a custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update >>> completed. However, I noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been >>> updated. The first entry still says: 9.1-RELEASE. Is this correct? >> >> Well, it just got worse - The last reboot now fails: I am using a >> remote console and it shows: >> >> --> Press a key on the console to reboot <-- >> Rebooting... >> Consoles: internal video/keyboard serial port >> BIOS drive A: is disk0 >> BIOS drive C: is disk1 >> BIOS 639kB/2087360kB available memory >> >> FreeBSD/x86 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1 >> (doug@zool.lafn.org, Thu Oct 3 04:23:13 PDT 2013) >> Can't work out which disk we are booting from. >> Guessed BIOS device 0xffffffff not found by probes, defaulting to >> disk0: >> >> panic: free: guard1 fail @ 0x7f481ed0 from >> /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/loader/../../common/module.c:1004 >> --> Press a key on the console to reboot <-- >> >> >> I can enter a string as it doesn't try to reboot again till the return >> is entered. I've tried b disk1, but it still only tries disk0. The >> system rebooted fine after the reboot after make kernel. Mergemaster >> didn't seem to affect anything dealing with boot. Don't know what >> make delete-old does but the descriptions lead me to not believe it >> could cause this. This system is on the other side of LA from me so >> its a major trip timewise. Any ideas how this can be recovered >> remotely? > > Booting off the live CD didn't find anything obviously wrong. I > replaced the kernel with the old one and still the same error. I am > having the drive mailed to me and will work with it here. However, it > appears a new install is going to be required. The old sysinstall had > the capability to skip over the formatting of the disk by just > entering quit. It would then just replace the system components and > leave everything else alone. I don't see any obvious way to do the > same thing with bsdinstall. Is there a way to do that. I don't want > to have to completely rebuild the drive, but just replace the system. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Just want to clarify the steps that started this if I read everything right: Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2 Step 2: compile from source ? Was this world, or just the custom kernel?? Step 3: make delete-old Step 4: mergemaster Step 5: reboot oops, something went wrong.. If my suspicions are correct, the source was still 9.1 patch 7, but the system was running 9.2 from the binary update. This may have caused the make delete-old to delete things it shouldn't have The very first thing I would do is bring the disk up in another system and make a backup copy of the data. I have never tried this process, I am basically just taking the steps I use for updating a zfs system using boot environments, and applying them in order to build a new kernel and world to an alternate directory, as a method of recovering the system. The next step I would take is to then mount the file systems in an alternate location, /mnt for example make MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX /mnt/usr/obj make DESTDIR /mnt cd /mnt/usr/src rm -r * .svn rm -r /usr/obj/* svn co https://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.2 make buildwolrd make buildkernel make installkernel make installworld make -DBATCH_DELETE_OLD_FILES delete-old make -DBATCH_DELETE_OLD_FILES delete-old-libs mergemaster -Ui /mnt/usr/src -D /mnt With some luck the file system will now contain a boot-able FreeBSD install, that will still have all the settings in place, except it will be the generic kernel. You should then just be able to build and install the custom kernel, from the booted system as you normally would. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 4 17:10:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002DE3E6 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 17:10:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A42CB29D6 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 17:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r94H9kJW084816; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 11:09:46 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id r94H9jLQ084813; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 11:09:45 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 11:09:45 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Antonio Olivares Subject: Re: # portmaster -r pixman fails with !#/bin/sh list too long In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <44d2np1p5k.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <444n9114v5.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 04 Oct 2013 11:09:46 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Lowell Gilbert , FreeBSD Questions , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Romain_Tarti=E8re?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 17:10:13 -0000 On Thu, 3 Oct 2013, Antonio Olivares wrote: > Have tried that, but it rebuilds pixman, but then X bombs out blurting > out messages that lib....pixman.so is missing :( > > I have tried to remove print/texlive-scheme-full; removed it, but then > run portmaster -R pixman, and portmaster -r pixman and the running of > it stops with message that !#/bin/sh .. argument too long and comes up > with texlive-?????-?????-_1 or similar. Have not been successful in > fixing this issue. I have 2 machines working and 2 not working > because of this. I am running out of ideas. Is there another way to > fix this issue manually, i.e, going to /usr/ports/x11/pixman and > rebuilding it there or have to go one by one? Careful: -R has a different meaning with portmaster than it does with portupgrade. It does not mean "recursive" like lowercase "-r". pkg_libchk from sysutils/bsdadminscripts can be used to detect installed ports that depend on missing libraries. From that, it may be possible to just give a list of all the ones that are missing pixman to portmaster. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 4 19:10:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4577D1 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:10:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C40A020C8 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:10:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-65.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5967424CDF; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:10:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r94JAVOc001917; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:10:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:10:31 +0200 From: Polytropon To: varanasi sainath Subject: Re: gptid's in fstab while installing FreeBSD using ISO Message-Id: <20131004211031.a0c6ba91.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 19:10:46 -0000 On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 20:04:09 +0530, varanasi sainath wrote: > Hi All, > > How do I get gptid's as default in fstab while installing using FreeBSD iso > file (Virtual,machine installation) ? > Is this possible currently? As far as I know, the installer "bsdinstall" currently does not have this option included, but it already offers labeling the partitions as desired, so you could change the content of /etc/fstab manually to use labels instead of those device names. You could do this as a post-installation task while leaving the installer for the command shell and using an editor to do this. > if not how do I achieve this? > I use guided partitioning while installing - If I were to tweak in to the > source code which files or drivers I should be focusing on? I haven't looked into the source yet, but I assume you should concentrate on the component doing the partitioning tasks as explained here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/bsdinstall-partitioning.html > which drivers write the contents of fstab? The corresponding installer's component itself which creates the file according to the partitioning layout at installation time. I assume the required data will actually be written when the installer performs the _real_ installation steps (committing to the installation). > PS: any reason why we use device names in the place of gptid's as default > in fstab. Because it's not always wanted or intended. Next to GPT partitioning with GPT labels, UFS partitioning is possible (both MBR and dedicated style), which _may_ have cases where it needs to be applied. Maybe this can happen when you have a very strange combination of striping, mirroring, encryption and other things that require metadata here and there... The different methods have different capabilities regarding labels (UFS labels, UFSIDs to be mentioned). You can find out more about them here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-glabel.html And read about the different methods of partitioning itself: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/disksetup.html Even "hardcoded" device names could also be required, though I can't imagine such a situation at the moment. :-) It highly depends on the toolset you're using (the bsdinstall program, gpart, fdisk & disklabel, newfs only). PS. I've trimmed the CC list to the freebsd-questions@ list for my reply, hope that's okay. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 4 20:10:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C923A258 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 20:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivares14031@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-x22b.google.com (mail-oa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B4BD2405 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 20:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id j10so1476267oah.2 for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 13:10:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9ubFP8q/FCs5p9c6MiPalaUK5R8HejchwMybGJ80VoQ=; b=wxFd5Cu8NRaBgAUDh83Egj9OTIbmowSS3UcLIs5XDBomdCq7vdDkRGrwWJbQ3PUdAn 7/8i/ca9WRXUhQwTaY0+07TLGHX47XvZPyZTzl5EJo/Typ4V83570MCK5KJP1BzmrI5G 2T3XYs/c+Wu9vkLM+lL46y74C2otSNDXTfMLyELZxd9HDZ5g36RZ7os9vw2oopT6OYM5 0uIMCn/fD7TjCfJ1jngB6LoyLRm3i1/IfXDzeH7d3Q6rm23QBqA4ZFV13irEpaiSn92D N0cIFrEBKWr8RODMB4UH9WddhAXefs/ZS8Cqco8drCgrf3vuPn/mfvWvz4FhU5fJpVpJ maag== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.96.169 with SMTP id dt9mr24291104oeb.27.1380917401908; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 13:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.168.132 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 13:10:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <44d2np1p5k.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <444n9114v5.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 15:10:01 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: # portmaster -r pixman fails with !#/bin/sh list too long From: Antonio Olivares To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Lowell Gilbert , FreeBSD Questions , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Romain_Tarti=E8re?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 20:10:02 -0000 On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 3 Oct 2013, Antonio Olivares wrote: > >> Have tried that, but it rebuilds pixman, but then X bombs out blurting >> out messages that lib....pixman.so is missing :( >> >> I have tried to remove print/texlive-scheme-full; removed it, but then >> run portmaster -R pixman, and portmaster -r pixman and the running of >> it stops with message that !#/bin/sh .. argument too long and comes up >> with texlive-?????-?????-_1 or similar. Have not been successful in >> fixing this issue. I have 2 machines working and 2 not working >> because of this. I am running out of ideas. Is there another way to >> fix this issue manually, i.e, going to /usr/ports/x11/pixman and >> rebuilding it there or have to go one by one? > > > Careful: -R has a different meaning with portmaster than it does with > portupgrade. It does not mean "recursive" like lowercase "-r". > > pkg_libchk from sysutils/bsdadminscripts can be used to detect installed > ports that depend on missing libraries. From that, it may be possible to > just give a list of all the ones that are missing pixman to portmaster. Dear all, It appears that using # portmaster -d -r pixman -x 'texlive-*-*' is doing the job :) I am keeping my fingers crossed and hope it comes through and succeeds! It stopped with libexo, but got that sorted out. Then stopped with mplayer*, but I am skipping it at this time. -x 'mplayer-*' and hope it succeeds, I'll then rebuild mplayer later if needed. Best Regards, Antonio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 4 21:46:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E566463 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:46:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juris.kaminskis@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x22e.google.com (mail-wg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCC5928AA for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:46:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id k14so4654701wgh.1 for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 14:46:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=V0mv8aNUi4Nvgxb7tQJYGBTUCMq5xwHKRr7oLH6SakY=; b=eVXDJpM1sbgscfaUQcmtGlLYuerCWRDbzSoQFunK1CmoKlb5rpiIS5tOXSlwITSPn1 NjhNUTVbIubyEsih1xdTwV++nWNdRrs7oMqHGhvcLtx7oPINnMOrxb4Un9iStLGIFjmp FLzUoaLV4fHnj7TgMkY148f4804Hw5+jn6EI3c0NcMLO5gF29WjsgO8LCtRPyzcj6JfJ 8K03ckSRxV9WtuaEZgiDkI5sGquSK+wCDc/Rr9WNO12fmoHYga9L4meVwCIfylrOLwuY hiDsMmOko1hjZ8+cHL1WGLQfRSd+B37I1SPbSRKInPIFjJdlgMe1lJotIF+j6qWoG3Jp aIcw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.80.39 with SMTP id o7mr14895217wjx.39.1380923169197; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 14:46:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.56.33 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:46:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 00:46:09 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Failure to build FreeBSD 9.2 From: Juris Kaminskis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 21:46:11 -0000 Hello, I am desperate trying to build FreeBSD 9.2. The same happens with FreeBSD-Current. When I build 9.1 kernel without building world everything is ok. My svn info Path: . Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src URL: http://svn0.eu.freebsd.org/base/release/9.2.0 Repository Root: http://svn0.eu.freebsd.org/base Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f Revision: 255954 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: gjb Last Changed Rev: 255898 Last Changed Date: 2013-09-26 21:28:11 +0300 (Thu, 26 Sep 2013) When I do standard process: make buildworld make buildkernel make installkernel reboot my kernel hangs up and does not respond. I have tried a lot of things but nothing works. my new kernel hangs right after: pci1: on pcib1 my uname -a FreeBSD station 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue Dec 4 09:23:10 UTC 2012 root@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 and my dmesg output: Copyright (c) 1992-2012 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue Dec 4 09:23:10 UTC 2012 root@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+ (2211.11-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x40fb2 Family = f Model = 4b Stepping = 2 Features=0x178bfbff Features2=0x2001 AMD Features=0xea500800 AMD Features2=0x1f real memory = 2147483648 (2048 MB) avail memory = 2045505536 (1950 MB) Event timer "LAPIC" quality 400 ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 2 core(s) cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) unknown: memory range not supported unknown: memory range not supported unknown: memory range not supported acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed acpi0: reservation of 100000, 7ff00000 (3) failed cpu0: on acpi0 cpu1: on acpi0 attimer0: port 0x40-0x43 irq 0 on acpi0 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 Event timer "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 100 atrtc0: port 0x70-0x71 irq 8 on acpi0 Event timer "RTC" frequency 32768 Hz quality 0 hpet0: iomem 0xfed00000-0xfed003ff on acpi0 Timecounter "HPET" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 950 Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 900 acpi_timer0: <32-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 3.0 on pci0 pcib1: failed to allocate initial memory window: 0xffb00000-0xffbfffff pci1: on pcib1 vgapci0: port 0x9800-0x98ff mem 0xc0000000-0xcfffffff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci1 hdac0: irq 16 at device 0.1 on pci1 pcib2: at device 6.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 re0: port 0xa800-0xa8ff mem 0xffcff000-0xffcfffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci2 re0: Using 1 MSI message re0: Chip rev. 0x38000000 re0: MAC rev. 0x00000000 miibus0: on re0 rgephy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 rgephy0: none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 10baseT-FDX-flow, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 100baseTX-FDX-flow, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-master, 1000baseT-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX-master, 1000baseT-FDX-flow, 1000baseT-FDX-flow-master, auto, auto-flow re0: Ethernet address: 00:19:db:f6:72:d0 ahci0: port 0xe800-0xe807,0xe400-0xe403,0xe000-0xe007,0xdc00-0xdc03,0xd800-0xd80f mem 0xffeffc00-0xffefffff irq 22 at device 18.0 on pci0 ahci0: AHCI v1.10 with 4 3Gbps ports, Port Multiplier supported ahcich0: at channel 0 on ahci0 ahcich1: at channel 1 on ahci0 ahcich2: at channel 2 on ahci0 ahcich3: at channel 3 on ahci0 ohci0: mem 0xffefe000-0xffefefff irq 16 at device 19.0 on pci0 usbus0 on ohci0 ohci1: mem 0xffefd000-0xffefdfff irq 17 at device 19.1 on pci0 usbus1 on ohci1 ohci2: mem 0xffefc000-0xffefcfff irq 18 at device 19.2 on pci0 usbus2 on ohci2 ohci3: mem 0xffefb000-0xffefbfff irq 17 at device 19.3 on pci0 usbus3 on ohci3 ohci4: mem 0xffefa000-0xffefafff irq 18 at device 19.4 on pci0 usbus4 on ohci4 ehci0: mem 0xffeff800-0xffeff8ff irq 19 at device 19.5 on pci0 ehci0: AMD SB600/700 quirk applied usbus5: EHCI version 1.0 usbus5 on ehci0 pci0: at device 20.0 (no driver attached) atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xff00-0xff0f at device 20.1 on pci0 ata0: at channel 0 on atapci0 hdac1: mem 0xffef4000-0xffef7fff irq 16 at device 20.2 on pci0 isab0: at device 20.3 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pcib3: at device 20.4 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 fwohci0: port 0xbc00-0xbc7f mem 0xffdff800-0xffdfffff irq 20 at device 2.0 on pci3 fwohci0: OHCI version 1.10 (ROM=1) fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4. fwohci0: EUI64 00:dc:10:00:01:2d:cc:8b fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 2 ports. fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. firewire0: on fwohci0 fwe0: on firewire0 if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:dc:10:2d:cc:8b fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:dc:10:2d:cc:8b fwip0: on firewire0 fwip0: Firewire address: 00:dc:10:00:01:2d:cc:8b @ 0xfffe00000000, S400, maxrec 2048 dcons_crom0: on firewire0 dcons_crom0: bus_addr 0x7c344000 fwohci0: Initiate bus reset fwohci0: fwohci_intr_core: BUS reset fwohci0: fwohci_intr_core: node_id=0x00000000, SelfID Count=1, CYCLEMASTER mode re1: port 0xb800-0xb8ff mem 0xffdff400-0xffdff4ff irq 21 at device 3.0 on pci3 re1: Chip rev. 0x18000000 re1: MAC rev. 0x00000000 miibus1: on re1 rgephy1: PHY 1 on miibus1 rgephy1: none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 10baseT-FDX-flow, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 100baseTX-FDX-flow, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-master, 1000baseT-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX-master, 1000baseT-FDX-flow, 1000baseT-FDX-flow-master, auto, auto-flow re1: Ethernet address: 00:19:db:f6:04:43 acpi_button0: on acpi0 uart0: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcefff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 ctl: CAM Target Layer loaded acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 acpi_throttle0: CLK_VAL field overlaps THT_EN bit device_attach: acpi_throttle0 attach returned 6 powernow0: on cpu0 device_attach: powernow0 attach returned 6 powernow1: on cpu1 device_attach: powernow1 attach returned 6 firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <= 0 cable IRM irm(0) (me) firewire0: bus manager 0 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec hdacc0: at cad 0 on hdac0 hdaa0: at nid 1 on hdacc0 pcm0: at nid 3 on hdaa0 hdacc1: at cad 0 on hdac1 hdaa1: at nid 1 on hdacc1 pcm1: at nid 20,22,21 and 25 on hdaa1 pcm2: at nid 27 on hdaa1 pcm3: at nid 30 on hdaa1 usbus0: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus1: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus2: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus3: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus4: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0 usbus5: 480Mbps High Speed USB v2.0 ugen0.1: at usbus0 uhub0: on usbus0 ugen1.1: at usbus1 uhub1: on usbus1 ugen2.1: at usbus2 uhub2: on usbus2 ugen3.1: at usbus3 uhub3: on usbus3 ugen4.1: at usbus4 uhub4: on usbus4 ugen5.1: at usbus5 uhub5: on usbus5 (aprobe0:ahcich0:0:15:0): NOP. ACB: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 (aprobe0:ahcich0:0:15:0): CAM status: Command timeout (aprobe0:ahcich0:0:15:0): Error 5, Retries exhausted uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub4: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhub5: 10 ports with 10 removable, self powered ugen0.2: at usbus0 ukbd0: on usbus0 kbd2 at ukbd0 ums0: on usbus0 ums0: 16 buttons and [XYZT] coordinates ID=2 uhid0: on usbus0 ugen5.2: at usbus5 ulpt0: on usbus5 ulpt0: using bi-directional mode ahcich0: Timeout on slot 0 port 0 ahcich0: is 00000002 cs 00000000 ss 00000000 rs 00000001 tfd 50 serr 00000000 cmd 00042017 (aprobe0:ahcich0:0:0:0): ATA_IDENTIFY. ACB: ec 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 (aprobe0:ahcich0:0:0:0): CAM status: Command timeout (aprobe0:ahcich0:0:0:0): Error 5, Retry was blocked run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 60 seconds for xpt_config ahcich0: Timeout on slot 0 port 0 ahcich0: is 00000002 cs 00000000 ss 00000000 rs 00000001 tfd 50 serr 00000000 cmd 00042017 (aprobe0:ahcich0:0:0:0): ATA_IDENTIFY. ACB: ec 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 (aprobe0:ahcich0:0:0:0): CAM status: Command timeout (aprobe0:ahcich0:0:0:0): Error 5, Retry was blocked ada0 at ata0 bus 0 scbus4 target 1 lun 0 ada0: ATA-5 device ada0: 100.000MB/s transfers (UDMA5, PIO 8192bytes) ada0: 76319MB (156301488 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) ada0: Previously was known as ad1 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! cd0 at ata0 bus 0 scbus4 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 66.700MB/s transfers (UDMA4, ATAPI 12bytes, PIO 65534bytes) cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present thanks Juris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 5 02:00:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183F8E3C for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 02:00:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D694C2269 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 02:00:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.177.216.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r951woo7075907 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: 9.1 - 9.2 upgrade From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: <1bdf3856902efd917ab9d489c8b6e751@dweimer.net> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2B420332-D26F-4926-A53A-787B110B0EFE@lafn.org> References: <62A8B684-0328-42F5-B9E4-D5DF80563D4D@lafn.org> <1bdf3856902efd917ab9d489c8b6e751@dweimer.net> To: dweimer@dweimer.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 02:00:21 -0000 On 4 October 2013, at 09:22, dweimer wrote: > On 10/04/2013 1:36 am, Doug Hardie wrote: >> On 3 October 2013, at 11:48, Doug Hardie wrote: >>> On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie wrote: >>>> I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system = uses a custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update = completed. However, I noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been = updated. The first entry still says: 9.1-RELEASE. Is this correct? >>> Well, it just got worse - The last reboot now fails: I am using a = remote console and it shows: >>> --> Press a key on the console to reboot <-- >>> Rebooting... >>> Consoles: internal video/keyboard serial port >>> BIOS drive A: is disk0 >>> BIOS drive C: is disk1 >>> BIOS 639kB/2087360kB available memory >>> FreeBSD/x86 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1 >>> (doug@zool.lafn.org, Thu Oct 3 04:23:13 PDT 2013) >>> Can't work out which disk we are booting from. >>> Guessed BIOS device 0xffffffff not found by probes, defaulting to = disk0: >>> panic: free: guard1 fail @ 0x7f481ed0 from = /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/loader/../../common/module.c:1004 >>> --> Press a key on the console to reboot <-- >>> I can enter a string as it doesn't try to reboot again till the = return is entered. I've tried b disk1, but it still only tries disk0. = The system rebooted fine after the reboot after make kernel. = Mergemaster didn't seem to affect anything dealing with boot. Don't = know what make delete-old does but the descriptions lead me to not = believe it could cause this. This system is on the other side of LA = from me so its a major trip timewise. Any ideas how this can be = recovered remotely? >> Booting off the live CD didn't find anything obviously wrong. I >> replaced the kernel with the old one and still the same error. I am >> having the drive mailed to me and will work with it here. However, = it >> appears a new install is going to be required. The old sysinstall = had >> the capability to skip over the formatting of the disk by just >> entering quit. It would then just replace the system components and >> leave everything else alone. I don't see any obvious way to do the >> same thing with bsdinstall. Is there a way to do that. I don't want >> to have to completely rebuild the drive, but just replace the system. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 > Just want to clarify the steps that started this >=20 > if I read everything right: >=20 > Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2 > Step 2: compile from source ? Was this world, or just the custom = kernel?? > Step 3: make delete-old > Step 4: mergemaster > Step 5: reboot > oops, something went wrong.. >=20 > If my suspicions are correct, the source was still 9.1 patch 7, but = the system was running 9.2 from the binary update. This may have caused = the make delete-old to delete things it shouldn't have >=20 > The very first thing I would do is bring the disk up in another system = and make a backup copy of the data. >=20 > I have never tried this process, I am basically just taking the steps = I use for updating a zfs system using boot environments, and applying = them in order to build a new kernel and world to an alternate directory, = as a method of recovering the system. >=20 > The next step I would take is to then mount the file systems in an = alternate location, /mnt for example >=20 > make MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX /mnt/usr/obj > make DESTDIR /mnt > cd /mnt/usr/src > rm -r * .svn > rm -r /usr/obj/* > svn co https://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.2 > make buildwolrd > make buildkernel > make installkernel > make installworld > make -DBATCH_DELETE_OLD_FILES delete-old > make -DBATCH_DELETE_OLD_FILES delete-old-libs > mergemaster -Ui /mnt/usr/src -D /mnt >=20 > With some luck the file system will now contain a boot-able FreeBSD = install, that will still have all the settings in place, except it will = be the generic kernel. You should then just be able to build and = install the custom kernel, from the booted system as you normally would. >=20 The exact sequence was: Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2 Step 2: make buildworld Step 3: make build_kernel KERNCONF=3DLAFN Step 4: make install_kernel KERNCONF=3DLAFN Step 5: reboot Step 6: mergemaster -p Step 7: make installworld Step 8: mergemaster -i Step 9: make delete-old Step 10: reboot oops, something went wrong.. After step 5, uname -a still showed 9.2 but now it listed the kernel I = built rather than generic. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 5 02:15:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59939A for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 02:15:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88A1B2314 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 02:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-65.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 228523CB03; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 04:08:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r95282vp003301; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 04:08:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 04:08:02 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Doug Hardie Subject: Re: 9.1 - 9.2 upgrade Message-Id: <20131005040802.32af9b73.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <2B420332-D26F-4926-A53A-787B110B0EFE@lafn.org> References: <62A8B684-0328-42F5-B9E4-D5DF80563D4D@lafn.org> <1bdf3856902efd917ab9d489c8b6e751@dweimer.net> <2B420332-D26F-4926-A53A-787B110B0EFE@lafn.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 02:15:52 -0000 On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote: > The exact sequence was: > > Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2 Have you verified in /etc/freebsd-update.conf that "src" is definitely part of what should be updated? > Step 2: make buildworld > Step 3: make build_kernel KERNCONF=LAFN > Step 4: make install_kernel KERNCONF=LAFN I assume the correct targets "buildkernel" and "installkernel" have been used. ;-) > Step 5: reboot Attention: Into single-user mode. > Step 6: mergemaster -p > Step 7: make installworld > Step 8: mergemaster -i > Step 9: make delete-old > Step 10: reboot Into multi-user mode again. > oops, something went wrong.. > > After step 5, uname -a still showed 9.2 but now it listed the > kernel I built rather than generic. Again, verify your configuration. Compare your steps with the comment header of /usr/src/Makefile which illustrates the exact procedure; from a (dated) 8-STABLE installation: 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source tree). 2. `make buildworld' 3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC). 4. `make installkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC). [steps 3. & 4. can be combined by using the "kernel" target] 5. `reboot' (in single user mode: boot -s from the loader prompt). 6. `mergemaster -p' 7. `make installworld' 8. `make delete-old' 9. `mergemaster' (you may wish to use -i, along with -U or -F). 10. `reboot' 11. `make delete-old-libs' (in case no 3rd party program uses them anymore) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 5 02:43:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55FA4CA for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 02:43:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01C1240E for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 02:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.177.216.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r952gEbK076622 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: 9.1 - 9.2 upgrade From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: <20131005040802.32af9b73.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <62A8B684-0328-42F5-B9E4-D5DF80563D4D@lafn.org> <1bdf3856902efd917ab9d489c8b6e751@dweimer.net> <2B420332-D26F-4926-A53A-787B110B0EFE@lafn.org> <20131005040802.32af9b73.freebsd@edvax.de> To: Polytropon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 02:43:41 -0000 On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote: > On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote: >> The exact sequence was: >>=20 >> Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2 >=20 > Have you verified in /etc/freebsd-update.conf that "src" > is definitely part of what should be updated? System is not bootable - can't verify anything=85 >=20 >=20 >=20 >> Step 2: make buildworld >> Step 3: make build_kernel KERNCONF=3DLAFN >> Step 4: make install_kernel KERNCONF=3DLAFN >=20 > I assume the correct targets "buildkernel" and "installkernel" > have been used. ;-) >=20 Yes >=20 >=20 >> Step 5: reboot >=20 > Attention: Into single-user mode. Not possible since the system is located over 100 miles away. = Everything has to be done via remote console. >=20 >=20 >=20 >> Step 6: mergemaster -p >> Step 7: make installworld >> Step 8: mergemaster -i >> Step 9: make delete-old >> Step 10: reboot >=20 > Into multi-user mode again. >=20 >=20 >=20 >> oops, something went wrong.. >>=20 >> After step 5, uname -a still showed 9.2 but now it listed the >> kernel I built rather than generic. >=20 > Again, verify your configuration. Compare your steps with the > comment header of /usr/src/Makefile which illustrates the > exact procedure; from a (dated) 8-STABLE installation: >=20 > 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source = tree). > 2. `make buildworld' > 3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DYOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is = GENERIC). > 4. `make installkernel KERNCONF=3DYOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is = GENERIC). > [steps 3. & 4. can be combined by using the "kernel" target] > 5. `reboot' (in single user mode: boot -s from the loader = prompt). > 6. `mergemaster -p' > 7. `make installworld' > 8. `make delete-old' > 9. `mergemaster' (you may wish to use -i, along with -U or = -F). > 10. `reboot' > 11. `make delete-old-libs' (in case no 3rd party program uses them = anymore) >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... >=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 5 03:03:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7628388A for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 03:03:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36B6A2551 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 03:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-65.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A67827790; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 05:03:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r95337CM001993; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 05:03:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 05:03:07 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Doug Hardie Subject: Re: 9.1 - 9.2 upgrade Message-Id: <20131005050307.7bab5735.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <62A8B684-0328-42F5-B9E4-D5DF80563D4D@lafn.org> <1bdf3856902efd917ab9d489c8b6e751@dweimer.net> <2B420332-D26F-4926-A53A-787B110B0EFE@lafn.org> <20131005040802.32af9b73.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 03:03:16 -0000 On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote: > > On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote: > >> The exact sequence was: > >> > >> Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2 > > > > Have you verified in /etc/freebsd-update.conf that "src" > > is definitely part of what should be updated? > > System is not bootable - can't verify anything… Does the system (or better, its "enclosure", software-wise) allow booting a rescue system or an emergency media, such as a FreeBSD v9 live system? The file /etc/freebsd-update.conf should contain the line Components src world kernel if you want to make sure the source is properly updated, along with the world and kernel (GENERIC). > >> Step 5: reboot > > > > Attention: Into single-user mode. > > Not possible since the system is located over 100 miles away. > Everything has to be done via remote console. Does this mean "SSH only" or do you have a _real_ console transmission by which you can access the system _prior_ to the OS providing the SSH access? I'm mentioning this because the traditional approach requires (few) steps done in the single-user mode where no SSH connectivity is provided in the "normal" way... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 5 04:50:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D093B85A for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 04:50:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4342B38 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 04:50:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.4] (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.177.216.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r954nI9i078306 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: 9.1 - 9.2 upgrade From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: <20131005050307.7bab5735.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <039B61B6-C918-494C-B327-52E4815660B1@lafn.org> References: <62A8B684-0328-42F5-B9E4-D5DF80563D4D@lafn.org> <1bdf3856902efd917ab9d489c8b6e751@dweimer.net> <2B420332-D26F-4926-A53A-787B110B0EFE@lafn.org> <20131005040802.32af9b73.freebsd@edvax.de> <20131005050307.7bab5735.freebsd@edvax.de> To: Polytropon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 04:50:44 -0000 On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon wrote: > On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote: >>=20 >> On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote: >>=20 >>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote: >>>> The exact sequence was: >>>>=20 >>>> Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2 >>>=20 >>> Have you verified in /etc/freebsd-update.conf that "src" >>> is definitely part of what should be updated? >>=20 >> System is not bootable - can't verify anything=85 >=20 > Does the system (or better, its "enclosure", software-wise) > allow booting a rescue system or an emergency media, such > as a FreeBSD v9 live system? Yes - but there is no one there who can successfully be told how to run = it. We have serious communications issues - they want to use back = slashes and have no idea what a slash is. Even if you tell them which = key to use, they know better and use a back slash cause thats what = Windoze uses. The disk should be in the mail to me now. I will be able = to work with it when it arrives. >=20 > The file /etc/freebsd-update.conf should contain the line >=20 > Components src world kernel >=20 > if you want to make sure the source is properly updated, > along with the world and kernel (GENERIC). As indicated before, I don't think all the source got updated. The = kernel showed 9.2 after recompilation. However UPDATING was not = updated. Thats as much as I could check before. >=20 >=20 >=20 >>>> Step 5: reboot >>>=20 >>> Attention: Into single-user mode. >>=20 >> Not possible since the system is located over 100 miles away. >> Everything has to be done via remote console. >=20 > Does this mean "SSH only" or do you have a _real_ console > transmission by which you can access the system _prior_ to > the OS providing the SSH access? I'm mentioning this because > the traditional approach requires (few) steps done in the > single-user mode where no SSH connectivity is provided in > the "normal" way=85 I have a telnet box that has serial connections to the console ports. = That approach has been used without any issues since FreeBSD 2.5. I do = disable all ports during the process via an reduced rc.conf file. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... >=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 5 05:10:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B27B9C for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 05:10:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D9772C7B for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 05:10:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-65.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22EE1276A6; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 07:10:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r955AloG002453; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 07:10:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 07:10:47 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Doug Hardie Subject: Re: 9.1 - 9.2 upgrade Message-Id: <20131005071047.29185a65.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <039B61B6-C918-494C-B327-52E4815660B1@lafn.org> References: <62A8B684-0328-42F5-B9E4-D5DF80563D4D@lafn.org> <1bdf3856902efd917ab9d489c8b6e751@dweimer.net> <2B420332-D26F-4926-A53A-787B110B0EFE@lafn.org> <20131005040802.32af9b73.freebsd@edvax.de> <20131005050307.7bab5735.freebsd@edvax.de> <039B61B6-C918-494C-B327-52E4815660B1@lafn.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 05:10:56 -0000 On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote: > > On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote: > >> > >> On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote: > >>>> The exact sequence was: > >>>> > >>>> Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2 > >>> > >>> Have you verified in /etc/freebsd-update.conf that "src" > >>> is definitely part of what should be updated? > >> > >> System is not bootable - can't verify anything… > > > > Does the system (or better, its "enclosure", software-wise) > > allow booting a rescue system or an emergency media, such > > as a FreeBSD v9 live system? > > Yes - but there is no one there who can successfully be told > how to run it. Not even inserting a USB stick (with the FreeBSD memstick data) or a CD? > We have serious communications issues - they want to use back > slashes and have no idea what a slash is. Maybe that is the result of many years of "administration" on "Windows" PCs. :-) > Even if you tell them which key to use, they know better and > use a back slash cause thats what Windoze uses. Uh... "knowing better" would disqualify them as maintainers of a server installation. The inability to learn (or even to read and follow instructions) is a dangerous thing. > The disk should be in the mail to me now. I will be able to > work with it when it arrives. Okay, that's also a possible alternative. To be honest, that's the first time I hear about this procedure. But doable. > > The file /etc/freebsd-update.conf should contain the line > > > > Components src world kernel > > > > if you want to make sure the source is properly updated, > > along with the world and kernel (GENERIC). > > As indicated before, I don't think all the source got updated. > The kernel showed 9.2 after recompilation. However UPDATING > was not updated. Thats as much as I could check before. I assume that this could be possible by inconsistently updated sources. It would be a good start to remove /usr/src and download the sources of the correct version via SVN _or_ freebsd-update again. Before the next installation attempt, /usr/obj should be removed as well, just to be sure. > >>>> Step 5: reboot > >>> > >>> Attention: Into single-user mode. > >> > >> Not possible since the system is located over 100 miles away. > >> Everything has to be done via remote console. > > > > Does this mean "SSH only" or do you have a _real_ console > > transmission by which you can access the system _prior_ to > > the OS providing the SSH access? I'm mentioning this because > > the traditional approach requires (few) steps done in the > > single-user mode where no SSH connectivity is provided in > > the "normal" way… > > I have a telnet box that has serial connections to the console > ports. That approach has been used without any issues since > FreeBSD 2.5. I do disable all ports during the process via an > reduced rc.conf file. A serial console should also work, but even though I've been using serial consoles (and _real_ serial terminals), one thing I'm not sure about: Is it possible to interrupt (!) the boot process at an early stage to get to the loader prompt and boot into single user mode from there? Ok boot -s If not, do you have the "beastie menu" (or whatever it is called today) enabled to go to SUM to perform the "make installworld" step? Anyway, if you can install everything is required with the disk at home, and then send it back to that "datacenter" (according to your characterization, the quotes are deserved), that should solve the problems and make sure everything works as intended. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 5 06:40:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB21ECF for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 06:40:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juris.kaminskis@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x22c.google.com (mail-wg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C9FD2F37 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 06:40:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b13so5066982wgh.23 for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 23:40:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=mLiDK+pdTT/a3d741utB6wH6uD57FK7QXWqjT26j090=; b=rvzcK7Ank6HSz81tKuk30T1OXUNh1lijNYUFs4twiDkmB2+50QH21Ft1VqS2lWnMAc KnMyuX0+PneSoMeaYdDoUY+Z5BuhUSX/Ni1PXzVhk/96MUZOfGWeKFGtWEzyv8Idj+Tb LW1ANE1Cik4c3CldnHHL1GxOXZbg/UGQn0Ym376VDxvIQXQK3Tj7KQSPmyWDZGlRfoJc ShqSKGJDA7NBtWYd/gDctm9TRnE1T57BGny/p0e8dvmpqiNVUTaniqqyKC/WqkS6NOEO Dc39UDEMcWSmiwviE77k5+Q5G9T+V/wTR8nSDdn7yfAWWNqIQz5RFzAgexAbT207pudb noKQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.208.49 with SMTP id mb17mr10461214wic.64.1380955231801; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 23:40:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.56.33 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 23:40:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 09:40:31 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Failure to build FreeBSD 9.2 From: Juris Kaminskis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 06:40:33 -0000 i recompiled my kernel with more verbose output and I see following errors before it stops: procfs registered panic: No usable event timer found! cpuid=0 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2a .... panic() at panic+0x1d8/frame .... initclocks() .... mi_startup() .... btext() ... KDB: enter: panic [thread pid 0 tid 100000] Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3b: moxq can someone help me to explain what this means and what to do next? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 5 06:52:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29A3FB5 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 06:52:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75A442FB0 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 06:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-65.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD7783CA47; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 08:52:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r956q3RW002994; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 08:52:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 08:52:03 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Juris Kaminskis Subject: Re: Failure to build FreeBSD 9.2 Message-Id: <20131005085203.5ce78e86.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 06:52:12 -0000 On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 09:40:31 +0300, Juris Kaminskis wrote: > i recompiled my kernel with more verbose output and I see following errors > before it stops: > > procfs registered > panic: No usable event timer found! > cpuid=0 > KDB: stack backtrace: > db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2a .... > panic() at panic+0x1d8/frame .... > initclocks() .... > mi_startup() .... > btext() ... > KDB: enter: panic > [thread pid 0 tid 100000] > Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3b: moxq > > can someone help me to explain what this means and what to do next? In many cases, this indicates a problem introduced by the computer's BIOS settings or ACPI. Make sure ACPI is enabled and the BIOS is configured properly (e. g. no timer settings modified or features deactivated). You could also check if a newer version of the BIOS is available. In addition, there's the suggestion to add the line debug.acpi.disabled="hostres" to /boot/loader.conf and reboot. Source: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.0R/errata.html -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 5 10:07:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152783F6 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 10:07:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [94.23.254.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D183F27BE for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 10:07:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from roxette.lamaiziere.net (unknown [84.100.169.149]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 41EC1A215; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 12:07:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by roxette.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533E520CB; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 12:07:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 12:07:16 +0200 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: Nikolas Britton Subject: Re: General questions regarding FreeBSD 10 Message-ID: <20131005120716.13a7c0dc@davenulle.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (smtp.lamaiziere.net); Sat, 05 Oct 2013 12:07:18 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 10:07:26 -0000 Le Fri, 27 Sep 2013 12:47:08 -0500, Nikolas Britton a écrit : > 10. How is the Java ecosystem on FreeBSD? Not bad IMO. I develop with maven/netbeans/openjdk in Java and Groovy on FreeBSD 9. That works. There is no profiler support in netbeans. And the JVM can't request huge memory page (may be this is fixed in 10?), so it could perform better : http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/tech/largememory-jsp-137182.html Java is much slower than other apps when the box is busy (building a world for example) but I'm not sure if this specific to FreeBSD. (I have litle success with Eclipse on the past, I don't use it) Regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 5 15:50:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5DE39E for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 15:50:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juris.kaminskis@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F097A281C for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 15:50:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id ex4so3013890wid.14 for ; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 08:50:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+6CKiyJGZhx/2ISiO4XeHK0dv1s9Ct95cjN6T2q3hvU=; b=PM0n48nBCYNcE4pGzxLRT77KlpzEGIhQww5mPSMJLSxd1tTRnQBi8qJQlrlrCc8vGk UbXVcZerf37cm7mZXo3KAk7eYeobFp4TuLNpkox4sMbafS+tHqn2RN/Gs6hb7mCJNltY xJseWwXzhpF6Qp1vVAA5C1YouqhZtmQhRN8pXWoXgDtkEbAffcZ3RyoaZAnCVrPsOz0B KuuTit++mp9e4cbB3huhhNF7sxrLNwfKj3n9Rg1KlVxeirK09HJhnXoqfMSX80lYLXL3 bblu0pxcg5oqgQ8AfAP343aosDKXqBJmLE2AgR49AcpCT3Behk9t5J1wj5g5F3cdli2b /kdg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.211.111 with SMTP id nb15mr11955843wic.55.1380988214380; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 08:50:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.56.33 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 08:50:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20131005121159.GK43287@webmail.dweimer.local> References: <20131005121159.GK43287@webmail.dweimer.local> Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 18:50:14 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Failure to build FreeBSD 9.2 From: Juris Kaminskis To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 15:50:16 -0000 2013/10/5 Polytropon > On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 09:40:31 +0300, Juris Kaminskis wrote: > > i recompiled my kernel with more verbose output and I see following > errors > > before it stops: > > > > procfs registered > > panic: No usable event timer found! > > cpuid=0 > > KDB: stack backtrace: > > db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2a .... > > panic() at panic+0x1d8/frame .... > > initclocks() .... > > mi_startup() .... > > btext() ... > > KDB: enter: panic > > [thread pid 0 tid 100000] > > Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3b: moxq > > > > can someone help me to explain what this means and what to do next? > > In many cases, this indicates a problem introduced by the > computer's BIOS settings or ACPI. Make sure ACPI is enabled > and the BIOS is configured properly (e. g. no timer settings > modified or features deactivated). You could also check if > a newer version of the BIOS is available. > > Update to new BIOS did the trick! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 5 16:44:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3DD9459 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 16:44:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from laszlo_danielisz@yahoo.com) Received: from nm9-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm9-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.213.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3887C2AC4 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 16:44:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [66.196.81.171] by nm9.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Oct 2013 16:44:46 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.201] by tm17.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Oct 2013 16:44:45 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1010.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Oct 2013 16:44:45 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 967735.47449.bm@omp1010.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 92264 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Oct 2013 16:44:45 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1380991485; bh=axoDxecATgYhBK9aVJ5pBlvdI/A+c4u+BLh8GNB3Ius=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qTm+021qxAIrLyZqh/KES151O8Xic431uoAxsIb5TBS/coXSAlw1493eyGzL/DwQ2ywLEWQ3hj8h6UHXl8K6OhTzLV7k8Enfb3IfZ3WUpTdJaq+E2TT+1wEchIgXScEbhQPVBejldam2Oj4+v/W5nunS3xZnU0aJre3hnvjJxeg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VjCKIIVpgPtqs3Q/yIHA6pGZj8c71wSL/jfT5j8QQMoQg0sY4P45BPMugkkar4EB+O0ejlnv6mfTGkGdPIS/SchQ/v5Mkw1GLg3SKkspji6FI+ow1PhewoO7zxnk96nMdmNiIKXQy30/giBfi0bPl8MEUkrZljCNxWDx8Z7fsnI=; X-YMail-OSG: s9yLcAQVM1nR5lwTpCPzelSn1kmuhRofTGXtVsi.GX5eTsE sQ0Te69Vy9ZsVdeF7f4sqWLfUBWxpMIiYZ9NzSYqUtkd4fi77hs4wpT3_rb7 .42snKTF0uKpzgIXYkL1YaAx8gva3GjK_emXVRA8f.yEWePvy8ezrFDimCfQ O4pzDW3oaku6.W4bEezAkrE5IrnWa2hgzZ23u6kCPM0O5sda8kftLlbOpaQ0 Ijus5afiijCc_hJ6wSbk9gJZnBCx.SyQ962AfitOG.ZX2j_4Hmxmfsl4Y7rj x7UJO.FK.02.HiH3IIU7GwGuSHzjyvYt36Q17U3KBxU04cfn28TvIl7b9a.c pX8IWst1ylSE9cf7FV.sJ9mUW.HIo6BJh0cS9rNlIUfyhYRIThb.Qi82gGAw c0uxCkwl8GPEQuPTdiMGBooB43bCinpWvZrA8w4xBlKVgxXrSGm4xxwMclKw QLjIiTsqAqtDK7QIQX28JgKTYLYH.flcto7EddJmZjkR3NkSkUTEdrp5btSP uxlW2HZWpyyn544wAmRBhWSz2J7kL6j4Gg3CP_.ZieTEVwJCE2OJ7kUTWbzk EQFIGxxPFbdvPZRqVs_3Qpx0- Received: from [80.98.102.209] by web160503.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 09:44:45 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, SGkgZXZlcnlib2R5LAoKVG9kYXkgd2hpbGUgdHJ5aW5nIHRvIGluc3RhbGwgbXVuaW4tbm9kZSBvbiA5LjIgZnJvbSBwb3J0cyBJIGtlZXAgZ2V0dGluZyB0aGUgZm9sbG93aW5nIGVycm9yOgoKPT09PiDCoENoZWNraW5nIGlmIHN5c3V0aWxzL211bmluLWNvbW1vbiBhbHJlYWR5IGluc3RhbGxlZAo9PT0.IENyZWF0aW5nIHVzZXJzIGFuZC9vciBncm91cHMuClVzaW5nIGV4aXN0aW5nIGdyb3VwIGBtdW5pbicuCkNyZWF0aW5nIHVzZXIgYG11bmluJyB3aXRoIHVpZCBgODQyJy4KcHc6IHVzZXIgJ211bmluJyABMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.160.587 Message-ID: <1380991485.82917.YahooMailNeo@web160503.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 09:44:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Laszlo Danielisz Subject: munin related To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Laszlo Danielisz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 16:44:53 -0000 Hi everybody,=0A=0AToday while trying to install munin-node on 9.2 from por= ts I keep getting the following error:=0A=0A=3D=3D=3D> =A0Checking if sysut= ils/munin-common already installed=0A=3D=3D=3D> Creating users and/or group= s.=0AUsing existing group `munin'.=0ACreating user `munin' with uid `842'.= =0Apw: user 'munin' already exists=0A*** [create-users-groups] Error code 7= 4=0A=0AStop in /usr/ports/sysutils/munin-common.=0A*** [build-depends] Erro= r code 1=0A=0AStop in /usr/ports/sysutils/munin-node.=0A*** [build] Error c= ode 1=0A=0AStop in /usr/ports/sysutils/munin-node.=0A=0A=0ADo you have any = =A0idea what can cause this?=0AThe ports are up to date.=0A=0AI've tried be= fore installing munin-node via pkg_add, it installed successfully but didn'= t work properly so I uninstall and tried it via ports.=0A=0AAny suggestions= ?=0A=0AThx!=0ALaci From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 5 19:11:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45728FA1 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 19:11:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from efeldhusen.lists@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-x235.google.com (mail-qc0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09EB6211C for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 19:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id q4so3726191qcx.26 for ; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 12:11:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lTLYdhnQBYm18oA2wzLdThp40S7U2ktNyp5UBEoFLmQ=; b=FP2DxwV1YrJDSoZURgNHH8+aY9lVUEsQpsBDv+j2gguaSMPH2y05J/tSH0aRU5fwqW SsqhaHAe8NEMh47mRywvB7CXUI45nqmx/ve4gz3NmxseyqMj9HAdFz9JUFbxEzAuwXQG MUE1VWiix7k8KHYR1UklqTY2Yf6Y1eA6ZvnjbLZhi5PSrGQBMe6QyKp2xDygaNTL67gD IvG7ysVngzvmjL9N4Khgf0aGzw0Fpdo/AJS2aE0a5od6NCZLYVAMpBgrL9Ym519/lQWY H0DNicuEqLHqaI94ekR6DgpoEZP2EAtyVOySBIis5mslkIpa3yvZ2sMnZkCTzKk7UvZx oJ+Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.54.129 with SMTP id q1mr26699829qag.19.1381000265253; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 12:11:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.75.231 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 12:11:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 15:11:05 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Problem completing a 9.1 release to 9.2 release upgrade From: Eric Feldhusen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 19:11:06 -0000 I have a server that was/is running 9.1 release that I tried to upgrade to 9.2 release. I missed the step of updating to the latest 9.1 patches by doing freebsd-update fetch freebsd-update install I went right to freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.2-RELEASE freebsd-update install rebooot freebsd-update install reboot again But my system still comes up as 9.1 release. Any suggestions on the steps to fix my goof? Eric Feldhusen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 5 19:34:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5666B7 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 19:34:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0355921EC for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 19:34:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r95JYExR049991 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 20:34:14 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk r95JYExR049991 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/r95JYExR049991; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (unprotected policy) Message-ID: <525069AD.7040505@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 20:34:05 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem completing a 9.1 release to 9.2 release upgrade References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="utWhq4C1cfNo2luosblJ4VWM6m6pSrBdK" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 19:34:19 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --utWhq4C1cfNo2luosblJ4VWM6m6pSrBdK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/10/2013 20:11, Eric Feldhusen wrote: > I have a server that was/is running 9.1 release that I tried to upgrade= to > 9.2 release. I missed the step of updating to the latest 9.1 patches b= y > doing >=20 > freebsd-update fetch > freebsd-update install >=20 > I went right to >=20 > freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.2-RELEASE > freebsd-update install >=20 > rebooot >=20 > freebsd-update install >=20 > reboot again >=20 > But my system still comes up as 9.1 release. >=20 > Any suggestions on the steps to fix my goof? Did you replace the generic kernel from 9.1-RELEASE with something you compiled yourself? If so, you may well have caused freebsd-update to ignore any modifications to the kernel. You can fix that by re-compiling a kernel using the 9.2-RELEASE sources and basically the same kernel configuration as for 9.1 (you will need to check for 9.2 related differences to the configuration, but these are likely to be pretty minor or not needed at all.) If you aren't using a customized kernel, then has the kernel in the standard location on your system actually been updated? You can tell if it's a 9.2 kernel by running strings(1) against the kernel binary, like s= o: # strings /boot/kernel/kernel | grep RELEASE If that's clearly a 9.2 kernel, then are you actually booting up from a different kernel somewhere else on your system? First of all, are there any other copies of FreeBSD kernels around anywhere -- on memsticks, or on split mirrors perhaps? You may need to fiddle with the bios settings or interrupt the boot sequence and type things directly at the loader if so. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --utWhq4C1cfNo2luosblJ4VWM6m6pSrBdK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iKYEARECAGYFAlJQabVfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEI1NTUyQTk2Mjc0RUQyNDg1NzM0MEVCNEYw QzhFNEU3NjBBRTkwOEMACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyc2ACeP0tUb8rWavNdR07uf2HMpD24 RWUAnjVU2ZXI1v9l5HODQC6nUI9LFaEn =+kDk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --utWhq4C1cfNo2luosblJ4VWM6m6pSrBdK-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 5 20:00:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D1DFC7 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 20:00:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from efeldhusen.lists@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-x234.google.com (mail-qc0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75BF1232C for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 20:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id p19so3782398qcv.11 for ; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 13:00:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Mw2+uklm9m8EPt/WmJKb1K/Gnwv5ug/5qgtXKDY6GNs=; b=xXPqjrZShaB1mjRFNuSQDeJtqxzqAcsQWmDkUONLRUAYDsyxV+gqqLXAn26xFchLE6 JtqIEsCoqW3XTTrix7PzS/ZMw4zYOX+Ob+A3IkyBiov1yHiOLW1sT0JALaNok74N+tX2 jdYIfdJP36X1C2lZPmvrAJvgt7bdhuMJtejJfopDw4hzvQO2E8AIQNGDY84vudq22I8Q adojyxHzLZI6yyEEJFEATh5BlYQXA2cR7DnczP+kwxEQ81di9YdOkb64SAYBpgT3EAQ3 aBIVFfoMiI+610lrXNzkp9E96wu0SB+o9nQKAcGhkM0lwI32odlCNhiqMo7nOi8PKmux sjpA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.30.227 with SMTP id v3mr348897qeh.92.1381003225641; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 13:00:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.75.231 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 13:00:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <525069AD.7040505@FreeBSD.org> References: <525069AD.7040505@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 16:00:25 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problem completing a 9.1 release to 9.2 release upgrade From: Eric Feldhusen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 20:00:26 -0000 Ah, yes, when this particular box was a 9.0-release, I had compiled a custom kernel to enable ipsec. When I check the strings, it's a 9.1 release kernel. I see my /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC is a 9.2 kernel, so I should just be able to do a cd /usr/src make buildworld make installworld reboot and I'll be running up on the 9.2 kernel and then I'll be all set? Thanks for the help. Eric On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 05/10/2013 20:11, Eric Feldhusen wrote: > > I have a server that was/is running 9.1 release that I tried to upgrade > to > > 9.2 release. I missed the step of updating to the latest 9.1 patches by > > doing > > > > freebsd-update fetch > > freebsd-update install > > > > I went right to > > > > freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.2-RELEASE > > freebsd-update install > > > > rebooot > > > > freebsd-update install > > > > reboot again > > > > But my system still comes up as 9.1 release. > > > > Any suggestions on the steps to fix my goof? > > Did you replace the generic kernel from 9.1-RELEASE with something you > compiled yourself? If so, you may well have caused freebsd-update to > ignore any modifications to the kernel. > > You can fix that by re-compiling a kernel using the 9.2-RELEASE sources > and basically the same kernel configuration as for 9.1 (you will need to > check for 9.2 related differences to the configuration, but these are > likely to be pretty minor or not needed at all.) > > If you aren't using a customized kernel, then has the kernel in the > standard location on your system actually been updated? You can tell if > it's a 9.2 kernel by running strings(1) against the kernel binary, like so: > > # strings /boot/kernel/kernel | grep RELEASE > > If that's clearly a 9.2 kernel, then are you actually booting up from a > different kernel somewhere else on your system? First of all, are > there any other copies of FreeBSD kernels around anywhere -- on > memsticks, or on split mirrors perhaps? You may need to fiddle with the > bios settings or interrupt the boot sequence and type things directly at > the loader if so. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 5 20:49:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225ACA25 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 20:49:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D982D2522 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 20:49:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-65.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F04B327697; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 22:41:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r95KfWgs001918; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 22:41:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 22:41:32 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Eric Feldhusen Subject: Re: Problem completing a 9.1 release to 9.2 release upgrade Message-Id: <20131005224132.baf52b18.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <525069AD.7040505@FreeBSD.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 20:49:05 -0000 On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 16:00:25 -0400, Eric Feldhusen wrote: > I see my /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC is a 9.2 kernel, so I should just > be able to do a > > cd /usr/src > make buildworld > make installworld > reboot > > and I'll be running up on the 9.2 kernel and then I'll be all set? No. You should follow the procedure mentioned in the comment header of /usr/src/Makefile. From my (old) b-STABLE system: # 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source tree). # 2. `make buildworld' # 3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC). # 4. `make installkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC). # [steps 3. & 4. can be combined by using the "kernel" target] # 5. `reboot' (in single user mode: boot -s from the loader prompt). # 6. `mergemaster -p' # 7. `make installworld' # 8. `make delete-old' # 9. `mergemaster' (you may wish to use -i, along with -U or -F). # 10. `reboot' # 11. `make delete-old-libs' (in case no 3rd party program uses them anymore) Pick what you need to do. When kernel and world sources are in sync, a new kernel can always be installed in multi-user mode. To install world, you should drop to single-user mode to avoid interferences with a full-featured system running in the "background". This procedure (or parts of it) will also work when you have been using freebsd-update to modify your kernel, world, and sources. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...