From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 21 21:00:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEB52645 for ; Sun, 21 Dec 2014 21:00:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9341A2DD1 for ; Sun, 21 Dec 2014 21:00:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBLL0LP4071027 for ; Sun, 21 Dec 2014 21:00:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201412212100.sBLL0LP4071027@kenobi.freebsd.org> From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org that need special attention X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 21:00:21 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 21:00:21 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- Open | 194884 | [acpi] Asus UX31E USB hangs during suspend, due t 1 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 24 15:30:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AEAA30E; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 15:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.metricspace.net (207-172-209-89.c3-0.arl-ubr1.sbo-arl.ma.static.cable.rcn.com [207.172.209.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B3F6447C; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 15:30:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.0.68] (unknown [172.16.0.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: eric) by mail.metricspace.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9EF1A16F6; Wed, 24 Dec 2014 15:30:26 +0000 (UTC) References: <54652C60.9050909@metricspace.net> <20141114161857.GA49507@dchagin.static.corbina.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3A965FB1-FB88-4506-935F-F30B812D814D@metricspace.net> X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11B511) From: Eric McCorkle Subject: Re: Lenovo W540 blank screen on suspend/resume after update Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 10:30:29 -0500 To: Adrian Chadd Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 15:30:34 -0000 Sorry for the long silence here... Even after applying the patch sent by dmitry, the problem seems to persist. = I've managed to track down the revision at which the problem appears, thoug= h. It shows up in 274085, when vt became the default console, though the pr= oblem shows up with both sc and vt. I may try reverting to before that point and applying your and dmitry's patc= hes and see if the problem shows up (however, for separate reasons, x11 is n= on-functional now for me) > On Nov 14, 2014, at 18:40, Adrian Chadd wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Thanks. Please do. start by reverting the patches from me and jkim; > see if it changes the behaviour. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 >=20 > -adrian >=20 >=20 >> On 14 November 2014 12:33, Eric McCorkle wrote: >> Sorry, don't remember the working version. >>=20 >> I have acpi_video compiled in to my kernel. I've tried it with both vt an= d >> sc and gotten the same result. >>=20 >> Might try to do more diagnostics this weekend. >>=20 >> On November 14, 2014 11:18:57 AM EST, Chagin Dmitry = >> wrote: >>>=20 >>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 02:13:35PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> Hi, >>>>=20 >>>> Does it stay blank if you have acpi_video (+ vt) loaded? >>>>=20 >>>> What was the revision of 11 you were previously running? >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> -adrian >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>> On 13 November 2014 14:10, Eric McCorkle wrote:= >>>>>=20 >>>>> Hello, >>>>>=20 >>>>> I updated my kernel and userland with a fresh update from 11 yesterday= , >>>>> and >>>>> I'm now seeing a blank screen after suspend/resume, where it was >>>>> working >>>>> fine previously. >>>>>=20 >>>>> I had been trying out the new vt console, so I switched back to sc, bu= t >>>>> the >>>>> blank screen is still there. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Sorry, I don't have any information beyond this (quite busy >>>>> these days). >>>>>=20 >>>>> Eric >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Lenovo t540, same here. r274463 + sc. resume worked two weeks ago. >>=20 >> -- >> Sent from my Blackphone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-mobile-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 26 17:12:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D736C60 for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 17:12:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sender1.zohomail.com (sender1.zohomail.com [72.5.230.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A7D364CCE for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 17:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from workbox.Home (184-100-71-241.mpls.qwest.net [184.100.71.241]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1419613055107302.92822222355346; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 08:57:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 10:57:31 -0600 From: Bigby James To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Lenovo T520: Present (-STABLE) vs. Future (-CURRENT) ACPI Support Message-ID: <20141226165731.GA28169@workbox.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 17:12:42 -0000 Howdy-ha, folks, Please forgive my ignorance if my question is rather mundane and/or inane. I'm pretty new to FreeBSD and its development cycle. Here's my situation: I've recently migrated my laptop (Levovo Thinkpad T520) to FreeBSD using the 10.1-STABLE snapshot, and most everything works pretty well. The only exceptions are some of the hardware keys, including the LCD brightness control keys, which is something I'd really like to have. Before going ahead with that install, though, on a lark I decided to try out the 11-CURRENT snapshot to see how it worked out. As it turns out, everything presently missing from 10-STABLE worked out of the box on -CURRENT. So I know that full support for my machine is in the source tree now and, barring any fundamental changes in the development branch, will be in the next -RELEASE. I don't really have the time, know-how or guts to maintain a -CURRENT install on this machine, so for the time being I'm sticking with 10-STABLE. So I'm wondering just how often ACPI functionality gets moved from the -CURRENT branch into the most recent release's -STABLE branch. In other words, what are the chances that the features I'm waiting for will get moved into the 10-STABLE branch in the near future? Are the ACPI devs pretty conservative with this? For the time being I can control screen brightness using xrandr, and as fond as I am with the convenience it is just a convenince all the same, so I can always remain patient. But I'm wondering if there's a way to know if and when ACPI functionality will get backported to -STABLE. I currently follow this list and the SVN mailing list for 10-STABLE, so I can also just keep an eye on them if that's the answer. Thanks in advance. - Bigby -- "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 26 17:54:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DF85753 for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 17:54:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B538D665AD for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 17:54:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id y19so14878481wgg.0 for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 09:54:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=1UiucIEI8iotwCWoUlQNqORCULJkY1jxRbKkDQWweiw=; b=HO4lmG6Dsw44bTAy5RMFj6QySgok+zfN1gN0Mg/eInMgIP4nH88OGmQNbpif0Vu+1N sehPIfvfv6/RW8BCyy3IwTAwQyOcZThGEnQjDcPeNp4GhFY92X4LTJ5JHz89FXbqU9sX RzYcKK7OXTdr+HqrQ6MPK5E6bgeQciw/pMyNbBTZsZMYMSOQ5MyopU/QnX052A8tKU6u 2T4G/gJjKexiTSPmHPO3wI+XMIekG2Q3eGOfex/p5iaEMwqhCkVuD7RVmwjdvRBKKCg5 xLmO7OBhI+4JelY70PZQ6TVRnTjn21oFn5gN6RwfdG+enJ7FwhEBkB8D2YWiGYAbC2mI YSkw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.108.9 with SMTP id hg9mr82474423wjb.68.1419616453825; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 09:54:13 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.106.195 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 09:54:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20141226165731.GA28169@workbox.Home> References: <20141226165731.GA28169@workbox.Home> Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 09:54:13 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: DVNE168c3MVcH5pnkRGe9L5b7S4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Lenovo T520: Present (-STABLE) vs. Future (-CURRENT) ACPI Support From: Adrian Chadd To: Bigby James Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 17:54:16 -0000 Hi! On 26 December 2014 at 08:57, Bigby James wrote: > Howdy-ha, folks, > > Please forgive my ignorance if my question is rather mundane and/or inane. I'm > pretty new to FreeBSD and its development cycle. Here's my situation: I've > recently migrated my laptop (Levovo Thinkpad T520) to FreeBSD using the > 10.1-STABLE snapshot, and most everything works pretty well. The only > exceptions are some of the hardware keys, including the LCD brightness control > keys, which is something I'd really like to have. > > Before going ahead with that install, though, on a lark I decided to try out the > 11-CURRENT snapshot to see how it worked out. As it turns out, everything > presently missing from 10-STABLE worked out of the box on -CURRENT. So I know > that full support for my machine is in the source tree now and, barring any > fundamental changes in the development branch, will be in the next -RELEASE. I > don't really have the time, know-how or guts to maintain a -CURRENT install on > this machine, so for the time being I'm sticking with 10-STABLE. So I'm > wondering just how often ACPI functionality gets moved from the -CURRENT branch > into the most recent release's -STABLE branch. In other words, what are the > chances that the features I'm waiting for will get moved into the 10-STABLE > branch in the near future? Are the ACPI devs pretty conservative with this? For > the time being I can control screen brightness using xrandr, and as fond as I am > with the convenience it is just a convenince all the same, so I can always > remain patient. But I'm wondering if there's a way to know if and when ACPI > functionality will get backported to -STABLE. I currently follow this list and > the SVN mailing list for 10-STABLE, so I can also just keep an eye on them if > that's the answer. Thanks in advance. Thanks for asking! developers backport to freebsd-stable (and earlier branches) whenever they have a need or desire. There's no hard and fast policy requiring it as we're all volunteers and there's noone being paid to maintain or develop laptop / tablet support for FreeBSD. In my particular case I run FreeBSD-HEAD on almost everything, and thus I don't backport things. I have enough limits on my time right now and trying to backport and test everything would be very time consuming. Other developers are different - some will run stable/10 (or stable/9!) and will end up backporting things that they need for whichever hardware they're using. But outside of a handful of strange situations, FreeBSD-HEAD has been remarkably wonderful to use as a desktop for the last 18 months. -adrian