From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 13 11:06:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08CDD5FD for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:06:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7D0F1140 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:06:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0DB6i5D095831 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:06:44 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s0DB6idi095829 for freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:06:44 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:06:44 GMT Message-Id: <201401131106.s0DB6idi095829@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:06:45 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/183866 geom [geom] graid cannot remove loader detected BIOS RAIDS o kern/183803 geom [geom] FreeBSD 10 Beta 2 geom module does not understa o kern/181704 geom [geom] ggatec crash the system when I write something o kern/179889 geom [geli] geli stopped work after updating RELEASE 9.* so o kern/178684 geom gpart(8) cannot get my GEOM tree o kern/178359 geom [geom] [patch] geom_eli: support external metadata o kern/176744 geom [geom] [patch] BIO_FLUSH not recorded by devstats o kern/170038 geom [geom] geom_mirror always starts degraded after reboot o kern/169539 geom [geom] [patch] fix ability to run gmirror on MSI MegaR a bin/169077 geom bsdinstall(8) does not use partition labels in /etc/fs f kern/165745 geom [geom] geom_multipath page fault on removed drive o kern/165428 geom [glabel][patch] Add xfs support to glabel o kern/164254 geom [geom] gjournal not stopping on GPT partitions o kern/164252 geom [geom] gjournal overflow o kern/164143 geom [geom] Partition table not recognized after upgrade R8 a kern/163020 geom [geli] [patch] enable the Camellia-XTS on GEOM ELI o kern/162690 geom [geom] gpart label changes only take effect after a re o kern/162010 geom [geli] panic: Provider's error should be set (error=0) o kern/161979 geom [geom] glabel doesn't update after newfs, and glabel s o bin/161807 geom [patch] add option for explicitly specifying metadata o kern/161752 geom [geom] glabel(8) doesn't get gpt label change o bin/161677 geom gpart(8) Probably bug in gptboot o kern/160409 geom [geli] failed to attach provider f kern/159595 geom [geom] [panic] panic on gmirror unload in vbox [regres f kern/159414 geom [isp] isp(4)+gmultipath(8) : removing active fiber pat p kern/158398 geom [headers] [patch] includes o kern/158197 geom [geom] geom_cache with size>1000 leads to panics o kern/157879 geom [libgeom] [regression] ABI change without version bump o kern/157863 geom [geli] kbdmux prevents geli passwords from being enter o kern/157739 geom [geom] GPT labels with geom_multipath o kern/157724 geom [geom] gpart(8) 'add' command must preserve gap for sc o kern/157723 geom [geom] GEOM should not process 'c' (raw) partitions fo o kern/157108 geom [gjournal] dumpon(8) fails on gjournal providers o kern/155994 geom [geom] Long "Suspend time" when reading large files fr o bin/154570 geom [patch] gvinum(8) can't be built as part of the kernel o kern/154226 geom [geom] GEOM label does not change when you modify them o kern/150858 geom [geom] [geom_label] [patch] glabel(8) is not compatibl o kern/150626 geom [geom] [gjournal] gjournal(8) destroys label o kern/150555 geom [geom] gjournal unusable on GPT partitions o kern/150334 geom [geom] [udf] [patch] geom label does not support UDF o kern/149762 geom volume labels with rogue characters o bin/149215 geom [panic] [geom_part] gpart(8): Delete linux's slice via o kern/147667 geom [gmirror] Booting with one component of a gmirror, the o kern/145818 geom [geom] geom_stat_open showing cached information for n o kern/145042 geom [geom] System stops booting after printing message "GE o kern/143455 geom gstripe(8) in RELENG_8 (31st Jan 2010) broken o kern/142563 geom [geom] [hang] ioctl freeze in zpool o kern/141740 geom [geom] gjournal(8): g_journal_destroy concurrent error o kern/140352 geom [geom] gjournal + glabel not working o kern/135898 geom [geom] Severe filesystem corruption - large files or l o kern/134113 geom [geli] Problem setting secondary GELI key o kern/133931 geom [geli] [request] intentionally wrong password to destr o bin/132845 geom [geom] [patch] ggated(8) does not close files opened a o bin/131415 geom [geli] keystrokes are unregulary sent to Geli when typ o kern/131353 geom [geom] gjournal(8) kernel lock o kern/129674 geom [geom] gjournal root did not mount on boot o kern/129645 geom gjournal(8): GEOM_JOURNAL causes system to fail to boo o kern/129245 geom [geom] gcache is more suitable for suffix based provid o kern/127420 geom [geom] [gjournal] [panic] Journal overflow on gmirrore o kern/124973 geom [gjournal] [patch] boot order affects geom_journal con o kern/124969 geom gvinum(8): gvinum raid5 plex does not detect missing s o kern/123962 geom [panic] [gjournal] gjournal (455Gb data, 8Gb journal), o kern/123122 geom [geom] GEOM / gjournal kernel lock o kern/122738 geom [geom] gmirror list "losts consumers" after gmirror de o kern/122067 geom [geom] [panic] Geom crashed during boot o kern/120091 geom [geom] [geli] [gjournal] geli does not prompt for pass o kern/115856 geom [geli] ZFS thought it was degraded when it should have o kern/115547 geom [geom] [patch] [request] let GEOM Eli get password fro o kern/113837 geom [geom] unable to access 1024 sector size storage o kern/113419 geom [geom] geom fox multipathing not failing back o kern/107707 geom [geom] [patch] [request] add new class geom_xbox360 to o kern/94632 geom [geom] Kernel output resets input while GELI asks for o kern/90582 geom [geom] [panic] Restore cause panic string (ffs_blkfree o bin/90093 geom fdisk(8) incapable of altering in-core geometry o kern/87544 geom [gbde] mmaping large files on a gbde filesystem deadlo o bin/86388 geom [geom] [geom_part] periodic(8) daily should backup gpa o kern/84556 geom [geom] [panic] GBDE-encrypted swap causes panic at shu o kern/79251 geom [2TB] newfs fails on 2.6TB gbde device o kern/79035 geom [vinum] gvinum unable to create a striped set of mirro o bin/78131 geom gbde(8) "destroy" not working. 80 problems total. From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 14 01:22:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00722676; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 01:22:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.xcllnt.net (mail.xcllnt.net [50.0.150.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD35C1E23; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 01:22:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.84] (50-0-150-213.dsl.static.sonic.net [50.0.150.213]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.xcllnt.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0E1M8p5036709 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:22:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: "deep" gpart backup? From: Marcel Moolenaar In-Reply-To: <1389461267.16576.69479689.0A3D893A@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:33:39 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <1023566295.20140105015301@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1389461267.16576.69479689.0A3D893A@webmail.messagingengine.com> To: Mark Felder X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 01:22:18 -0000 On Jan 11, 2014, at 9:27 AM, Mark Felder wrote: > On Sat, Jan 4, 2014, at 15:53, Lev Serebryakov wrote: >> Hello, Freebsd-geom. >> >> Is here any way to make "deep" "gpart backup | gpart restore"? Now, when >> I >> have disk with MBR, with two slices, each of which has BSD label, I need >> three calls of backup / restore commands with proper arguments. It looks >> just stupid :) >> > > If gpart can see and manipulate all of these elements it really should > be able to backup and restore them all atomically. This statement is close to being ridiculous. Being able to operate on all components is absolutely not a sufficient condition for doing atomic operations across a multitude of them. Atomicity is a very particular requirement. Note also that gpart (in its most vague definition) cannot actually manipulate on *all* elements at the same time. Nested partitioning schemes are not seen by the gpart invocation that works on the outer-most container. Only when running gpart on a partition will it (= gpart) be able to work on the nested partitions. As such, no single gpart invocation sees all levels of nesting. gpart is an inherently low-level utility and what you want is intended (i.e. by design) to be handled at an application layer above gpart. FYI, -- Marcel Moolenaar marcel@xcllnt.net From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 14 01:57:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E78531F5 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 01:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A144F1060 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 01:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6C420E13 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:57:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:57:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=smtpout; bh=2ZA t7TbxsiazWrRR5yAsZ+tuxMY=; b=eiE1fM0M6zubHCx1MgbSA44fdSctlIrucm6 xC+v/6aPExKV0JSWDN1Whqbqnbm6Kvb2H5OaZrWxwzZJnzhMGPHEuOElXyT0o6Aw LohJkGkHSd0wsPNUwOvw5i+/mMDP6f8Ofk5FlDUhX3O3Iub0yPtp16l8A6iQ0SuG nbJfF1LU= X-Sasl-enc: +yz/EmCo8GhLtMCD9Ox61BE9ah8hNrCIgqsymY6ed7Wj 1389664665 Received: from [172.16.1.145] (unknown [68.117.126.78]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9C375C00E87; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:57:45 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2568DAC3-8F87-4AB4-97AC-7995E3070FF3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: "deep" gpart backup? From: Mark Felder In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:57:43 -0600 Message-Id: References: <1023566295.20140105015301@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1389461267.16576.69479689.0A3D893A@webmail.messagingengine.com> To: Marcel Moolenaar X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 01:57:48 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_2568DAC3-8F87-4AB4-97AC-7995E3070FF3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jan 13, 2014, at 18:33, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >=20 > On Jan 11, 2014, at 9:27 AM, Mark Felder wrote: >=20 >> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014, at 15:53, Lev Serebryakov wrote: >>> Hello, Freebsd-geom. >>>=20 >>> Is here any way to make "deep" "gpart backup | gpart restore"? Now, = when >>> I >>> have disk with MBR, with two slices, each of which has BSD label, I = need >>> three calls of backup / restore commands with proper arguments. It = looks >>> just stupid :) >>>=20 >>=20 >> If gpart can see and manipulate all of these elements it really = should >> be able to backup and restore them all atomically. >=20 > This statement is close to being ridiculous. Being able to > operate on all components is absolutely not a sufficient > condition for doing atomic operations across a multitude > of them. Atomicity is a very particular requirement. >=20 You're right. Throwing out that word without thinking carefully was not = smart. After considering the bit of knowledge I have about how geom = operates it wouldn't be able to go a layer deeper without tasting first = unless we somehow teach gpart how to prepare transactions and write the = labels all at once, then re-taste the device. Probably more difficult = than it's worth. I imagine a batch transaction that rolls back to the = previous state could be achieved. Though we all know the attempt would = taint any existing data, but if you're attempting this you should have = already said your farewells to the data anyway :-) > Note also that gpart (in its most vague definition) cannot > actually manipulate on *all* elements at the same time. > Nested partitioning schemes are not seen by the gpart > invocation that works on the outer-most container. Only > when running gpart on a partition will it (=3D gpart) be > able to work on the nested partitions. As such, no single > gpart invocation sees all levels of nesting. >=20 Aha, one step ahead of me :-) > gpart is an inherently low-level utility and what you want > is intended (i.e. by design) to be handled at an application > layer above gpart. >=20 It's pretty low level, but it does seem to be missing some features I = would expect in such a low level utility such as the ability to create = partitions with custom IDs. Being limited to the handful defined in the = gpart man page has caused me problems a few times. See: = http://www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/partitions/partition_types-1.html which are = almost all included in the Linux fdisk utility. Annnnd now something at the end of the gpart man page just caught my = eye: AUTHORS Marcel Moolenaar I'll see my way out :-) --Apple-Mail=_2568DAC3-8F87-4AB4-97AC-7995E3070FF3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJS1JmXAAoJEJg7ZFAfE+JS8qgH/jmOqMNS/EZA+1QQDl8t9VLx o4bnAfzdA/bi36axHK5kWPsdHjNf3vJPyZnppCLWxm91J/o6QpN6JsvJ0L3rCIRn /JkX7vs/7mYGm6FgZdQLCjjlsZdU1bTr0jpsy61AMwp5IAnCzzpNhPqDxBUbFbSy ze4vheigwMUo4TyhBlqoGhBOYSfl3Vtr+cquuA0IP0fMPo7WO5GblrYtU3thPXi9 btpQTGEDwMHgLkfvP36yHb565uge3/vyFjGKZd6803QTcR38EkUoTyrUvQtM56At TldOmZSsrOy8w8QtgTroYJ3DkYe+XHNG2MO3+Rgl1NY+m8TFA/LRyGDETUStJhg= =qzxp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_2568DAC3-8F87-4AB4-97AC-7995E3070FF3-- From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 14 03:35:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F1208BE; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 03:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.xcllnt.net (mail.xcllnt.net [50.0.150.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E81E17E1; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 03:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.84] (50-0-150-213.dsl.static.sonic.net [50.0.150.213]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.xcllnt.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0E3YomX037691 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:34:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_66F899E5-F6C7-42C1-8905-B22460CAB990"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: "deep" gpart backup? From: Marcel Moolenaar In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:34:49 -0800 Message-Id: References: <1023566295.20140105015301@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1389461267.16576.69479689.0A3D893A@webmail.messagingengine.com> To: Mark Felder X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 03:35:00 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_66F899E5-F6C7-42C1-8905-B22460CAB990 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jan 13, 2014, at 5:57 PM, Mark Felder wrote: >=20 >> gpart is an inherently low-level utility and what you want >> is intended (i.e. by design) to be handled at an application >> layer above gpart. >>=20 >=20 > It's pretty low level, but it does seem to be missing some features I = would expect in such a low level utility such as the ability to create = partitions with custom IDs. You can. While gpart provides common aliases that make it easier to work on different schemes without having to know too many details, you can still use the scheme-specific partition types if you know them. For example: ns1% sudo gpart create -s mbr md0 md0 created ns1% gpart show md0 =3D> 1 2047 md0 MBR (1.0M) 1 2047 - free - (1.0M) New let's create a NetBSD slice: ns1% sudo gpart add -t netbsd -s 1023 md0 gpart: Invalid argument Uh, ok. No alias know. Raw value it is... ns1% sudo gpart add -t \!0xa9 -s 1023 md0 md0s1 added ns1% gpart show md0 =3D> 1 2047 md0 MBR (1.0M) 1 1023 1 !169 (512K) 1024 1024 - free - (512K) HTH, --=20 Marcel Moolenaar marcel@xcllnt.net --Apple-Mail=_66F899E5-F6C7-42C1-8905-B22460CAB990 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAlLUsFkACgkQpgWlLWHuifa1gwCfW+lpd27SIuWuwBADW11A0N5o 9u4An3o3tce56nJ4v7Aq4a6o387+cdPE =KTut -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_66F899E5-F6C7-42C1-8905-B22460CAB990-- From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 14 03:36:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8B858FA for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 03:36:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81D4517E8 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 03:36:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10EAB20A47 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:36:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:36:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=smtpout; bh=xbk bEnnnkqEN2TQJ5fD3GNIkHl8=; b=rqkoOsR4y9XKsej4X23+BmgaBD5HvTjTabN k5dowvW6xpmovzJOGv6aQpoyf/5FjU7JHKoVrHCBV3ogHCV5rv7pVGKSrsVaeZ49 gMoR61EzFy90GtiPzn7GFHSPa4RO40MUuuWskzsgffByYzQqDESS83UpKsZE1fCm 3t1BYoMA= X-Sasl-enc: /IUYWjkovxJeuKrO4E6Zua7p+6YQescYuhTV3uznbTDz 1389670579 Received: from [172.16.1.145] (unknown [68.117.126.78]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7F649C00E87; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:36:19 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_47C0C745-EC82-41F0-9ED4-CBA8C487FCAB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: "deep" gpart backup? From: Mark Felder In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 21:36:17 -0600 Message-Id: <07F2E9B0-F695-4A1D-B046-C902F0ED1A0E@FreeBSD.org> References: <1023566295.20140105015301@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1389461267.16576.69479689.0A3D893A@webmail.messagingengine.com> To: Marcel Moolenaar X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 03:36:25 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_47C0C745-EC82-41F0-9ED4-CBA8C487FCAB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jan 13, 2014, at 21:34, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > Uh, ok. No alias know. Raw value it is... > > ns1% sudo gpart add -t \!0xa9 -s 1023 md0 > md0s1 added > ns1% gpart show md0 > => 1 2047 md0 MBR (1.0M) > 1 1023 1 !169 (512K) > 1024 1024 - free - (512K) Yay! Can you slip that into the man page? That would be great :-) --Apple-Mail=_47C0C745-EC82-41F0-9ED4-CBA8C487FCAB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJS1LCyAAoJEJg7ZFAfE+JS3KkIALEUcaAdGDCwHL5U28zK+2Cb 0Xgfp/9n7O6Lmz3rs9cfEQtoNmda8OM/8trCL2hjiPLJVEq2L8qN3A7/hZ8vfOaQ ayhVdtGXSROM2nr5LJjOhQgrZlF4hNUyB2SxHCF/m7YzZHgu3zSgcpR2hoEbCpa8 hCg3R+fqVU9GxkHSnnTW86m66e0XFiVviFcScVGPV+zkehpl9TwZbQ7Bm0n60ur2 5q5/Xm4uwSXEPW+twI/sPWIzZWjpjhKlUTmz4X3LbU+gUhrD8NY+wLYNn82tLznc yU74U+eWsDLil7zZTnGgHbTi/qZXn2hmsGtAy850NXpoEsVQFRJdFTthwBVl+AI= =+Rjv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_47C0C745-EC82-41F0-9ED4-CBA8C487FCAB-- From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 14 03:42:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E78C9CB; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 03:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.xcllnt.net (mail.xcllnt.net [50.0.150.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C339E188A; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 03:42:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.84] (50-0-150-213.dsl.static.sonic.net [50.0.150.213]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.xcllnt.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0E3gQsb037733 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:42:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4B43F5BB-ABB8-4432-B5DB-40FD5FB9A516"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: "deep" gpart backup? From: Marcel Moolenaar In-Reply-To: <07F2E9B0-F695-4A1D-B046-C902F0ED1A0E@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:42:26 -0800 Message-Id: <4C2C8202-D6B7-4E3A-BE6C-26D362300A2E@xcllnt.net> References: <1023566295.20140105015301@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1389461267.16576.69479689.0A3D893A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <07F2E9B0-F695-4A1D-B046-C902F0ED1A0E@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Felder X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 03:42:32 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_4B43F5BB-ABB8-4432-B5DB-40FD5FB9A516 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jan 13, 2014, at 7:36 PM, Mark Felder wrote: >=20 > On Jan 13, 2014, at 21:34, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >=20 >> Uh, ok. No alias know. Raw value it is... >>=20 >> ns1% sudo gpart add -t \!0xa9 -s 1023 md0 >> md0s1 added >> ns1% gpart show md0 >> =3D> 1 2047 md0 MBR (1.0M) >> 1 1023 1 !169 (512K) >> 1024 1024 - free - (512K) >=20 > Yay! Can you slip that into the man page? That would be great :-) Ok, I need your help. The manpage does mention it, so it's probably not too clear. This is what the manpage says: : PARTITION TYPES Partition types are identified on disk by particular strings or = magic values. The gpart utility uses symbolic names for common partition = types so the user does not need to know these values or other details of = the partitioning scheme in question. The gpart utility also allows the = user to specify scheme-specific partition types for partition types that = do not have symbolic names. Symbolic names currently understood are: : freebsd A FreeBSD partition subdivided into filesystems = with a BSD disklabel. This is a legacy partition type = and should not be used for the APM or GPT schemes. = The scheme-specific types are "!165" for MBR, = "!FreeBSD" for APM, and "!516e7cb4-6ecf-11d6-8ff8-00022d09712b" = for GPT. : Does it help if we add an example? --=20 Marcel Moolenaar marcel@xcllnt.net --Apple-Mail=_4B43F5BB-ABB8-4432-B5DB-40FD5FB9A516 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAlLUsiIACgkQpgWlLWHuifZQqwCeLR7vEOYtdkLTZodBoj/3k5IU oU4AnjJ0QDhU6kKGlOyOJjiOvGjYD7vW =5HZk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_4B43F5BB-ABB8-4432-B5DB-40FD5FB9A516-- From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 14 04:05:28 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEEC2B02 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 04:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96E4419AE for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 04:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ADCA21131 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 23:05:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 13 Jan 2014 23:05:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=smtpout; bh=3nG dAtWhtq9KQ96DRE8r5HARuI8=; b=GPjtQ4mNnuouCE6RfP3Cd9RUy4dMBc1hrEa y0S7my6QJcr6M0yjtBKpk+60NZgTUeh9eKel3G6YTgTnGXDvj0XcPw8wzCPimLY4 19kIdulmZVwKXsNLmJWGnPP2KGLWGvpazfposA4I3hLEIv8GCYPlvLWJzaxUQ3DM z0G6t0Sg= X-Sasl-enc: 9pRtIvmMp9+4uEniz+W//Afv4YOCkiwBV6VcJt5qaMnE 1389672325 Received: from [172.16.1.145] (unknown [68.117.126.78]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F2C38C00E84; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 23:05:24 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_12323ADE-9932-45C4-924C-33DC94B95208"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: "deep" gpart backup? From: Mark Felder In-Reply-To: <4C2C8202-D6B7-4E3A-BE6C-26D362300A2E@xcllnt.net> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:05:23 -0600 Message-Id: References: <1023566295.20140105015301@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1389461267.16576.69479689.0A3D893A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <07F2E9B0-F695-4A1D-B046-C902F0ED1A0E@FreeBSD.org> <4C2C8202-D6B7-4E3A-BE6C-26D362300A2E@xcllnt.net> To: Marcel Moolenaar X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 04:05:28 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_12323ADE-9932-45C4-924C-33DC94B95208 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jan 13, 2014, at 21:42, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >=20 > On Jan 13, 2014, at 7:36 PM, Mark Felder wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> On Jan 13, 2014, at 21:34, Marcel Moolenaar = wrote: >>=20 >>> Uh, ok. No alias know. Raw value it is... >>>=20 >>> ns1% sudo gpart add -t \!0xa9 -s 1023 md0 >>> md0s1 added >>> ns1% gpart show md0 >>> =3D> 1 2047 md0 MBR (1.0M) >>> 1 1023 1 !169 (512K) >>> 1024 1024 - free - (512K) >>=20 >> Yay! Can you slip that into the man page? That would be great :-) >=20 > Ok, I need your help. The manpage does mention it, so it's > probably not too clear. This is what the manpage says: >=20 > : >=20 > PARTITION TYPES > Partition types are identified on disk by particular strings or = magic > values. The gpart utility uses symbolic names for common = partition types > so the user does not need to know these values or other details of = the > partitioning scheme in question. The gpart utility also allows = the user > to specify scheme-specific partition types for partition types = that do > not have symbolic names. Symbolic names currently understood are: >=20 > : >=20 > freebsd A FreeBSD partition subdivided into filesystems = with a > BSD disklabel. This is a legacy partition type = and > should not be used for the APM or GPT schemes. = The > scheme-specific types are "!165" for MBR, = "!FreeBSD" for > APM, and "!516e7cb4-6ecf-11d6-8ff8-00022d09712b" = for > GPT. >=20 > : >=20 I have misread this specific sentence several times over the last few = years: "The gpart utility also allows the user to specify scheme-specific = partition=20 types for partition types that do not have symbolic names" I guess it doesn't help that I've always known it as an ID not a = "partition type". Even the Wikipedia article for "Partition types" calls = them IDs. I thought the mention of the values "!165" etc were simply = confirming what values gpart was using internally in relation to those = symbolic names. I'm very pleased to know this is possible now. :-) > Does it help if we add an example? It's possible that I'm in the minority here, but an example would make = it clear. --Apple-Mail=_12323ADE-9932-45C4-924C-33DC94B95208 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJS1LeDAAoJEJg7ZFAfE+JSvewIALhOc1bCeCqekbR0r4eMtUUh mWaX6XIikPreaWS7a3bw2mMFuQLbxKg4ibg2YZ9nQ17FCT1vlKA+FQ40HEWqrH9C kVQSEm2yiy4eXxIIZyCXeBoGIRn53Q/8NAFe12tzfwtd1lDhhnuqkPCNx4VusOTA 1DPV3TPcxwNQtA25cH+E82jPnoak19yi8piC1atIOL4BZlUlOP+bEtz2NILRRFB8 GYr//t2F3uWTnzq+lImFcYRfbVtULtHl5ip40VRqJhCXejH1rdRKmo9pzCPxFOte iIk/SNtdrmvyTczBcKO8pAYMFllYqIVMLgm1v0DZVHNViVNCe31Oa/9lAt+hTOs= =PKOn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_12323ADE-9932-45C4-924C-33DC94B95208-- From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 14 05:09:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E01EF734; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 05:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 704BB1E73; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 05:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0E59EZt091115; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:09:14 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id s0E59E6g091112; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:09:14 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:09:14 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Marcel Moolenaar Subject: Re: "deep" gpart backup? In-Reply-To: <4C2C8202-D6B7-4E3A-BE6C-26D362300A2E@xcllnt.net> Message-ID: References: <1023566295.20140105015301@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1389461267.16576.69479689.0A3D893A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <07F2E9B0-F695-4A1D-B046-C902F0ED1A0E@FreeBSD.org> <4C2C8202-D6B7-4E3A-BE6C-26D362300A2E@xcllnt.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:09:14 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 05:09:21 -0000 On Mon, 13 Jan 2014, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2014, at 7:36 PM, Mark Felder wrote: > >> >> On Jan 13, 2014, at 21:34, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >> >>> Uh, ok. No alias know. Raw value it is... >>> >>> ns1% sudo gpart add -t \!0xa9 -s 1023 md0 >>> md0s1 added >>> ns1% gpart show md0 >>> => 1 2047 md0 MBR (1.0M) >>> 1 1023 1 !169 (512K) >>> 1024 1024 - free - (512K) >> >> Yay! Can you slip that into the man page? That would be great :-) > > Ok, I need your help. The manpage does mention it, so it's > probably not too clear. This is what the manpage says: > > : > > PARTITION TYPES > Partition types are identified on disk by particular strings or magic > values. The gpart utility uses symbolic names for common partition types > so the user does not need to know these values or other details of the > partitioning scheme in question. The gpart utility also allows the user > to specify scheme-specific partition types for partition types that do > not have symbolic names. Symbolic names currently understood are: > > : > > freebsd A FreeBSD partition subdivided into filesystems with a > BSD disklabel. This is a legacy partition type and > should not be used for the APM or GPT schemes. The > scheme-specific types are "!165" for MBR, "!FreeBSD" for > APM, and "!516e7cb4-6ecf-11d6-8ff8-00022d09712b" for > GPT. > > : > > > Does it help if we add an example? Probably. I'd suggest one with \!12 as a common need. Since we're talking about this, maybe an option for gpart to show the aliases it knows would be useful. Or that list could be added to man page, but then it's in two places. From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 17 19:22:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0F17DC2 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 19:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-x242.google.com (mail-pb0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAB361206 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 19:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f66.google.com with SMTP id ma3so3134654pbc.5 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:22:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:from:to:reply-to:subject:date; bh=Iyk2K6fvYNLbDPkOF2p5SQgAED667GVP56ua58RI4bE=; b=bRIet1RcTaJyeTIGVy8GBonkSnghCMMJfBXHQNCrM7jmEnIhTMJtsiDps1JTi15HcE 2QMPjQrHGRxMQSdyEZMZFa9sD+jklw57i/DIxiX9HAmyFjPy/qqqQCzj0bOlBheD8JMU 87Nr6jbjuLqkok0Jsq+A71dS4ou3DjAEO/BoMkC384fvUnq7qy14d1vq0FxaKx4+wjcQ q8IPuI5Z56W6ct4Xpz5r8kvSQji1SVGoY6EwxjRJhWvjbjS3GtB7BBAZAgcgeTebbZNr YshKaws/z1NOxEo2bwKbBh5MTsmhRVJUTvup9NY/vvicLRRsqIEho2X2n6f3BmsnbuVr uvSg== X-Received: by 10.68.219.168 with SMTP id pp8mr3884961pbc.51.1389986530466; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:22:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([124.253.47.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jp3sm24526228pbc.36.2014.01.17.11.22.07 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:22:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52d982e1.23c8440a.411f.6de0@mx.google.com> From: bettie30617@googlemail.com To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: RE: LOCAL MAP OPTIMIZATION FOR : mail-archive.com (Less Than $99/Month) Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 00:52:15 +0530 X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: JUDY18088@gmail.com List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 19:22:11 -0000 Good Morning Sir / Mam Is your business ranking in local maps shown on PAGE 1 of google ? With new google policies they have specifically asked local business owners to optimize their website for local maps rather than JUST organics. Do you know the reason why you are not ranked well on google MAPs or why there is drop in your website rankings? Prime reason for bad rankings for a busniess is lack of local presence and local citations ie getting your business listed on directories like YELP, MANTA & Many more. These websites not just give your business a push but also help you Maintain a good Online Reputation. Why you need to optimize your website for local MAP Listings ? - MAP listings get 10 times more clicks than organic listings - Increased conversions because of real reviews posted on your Google Plus Page - Every year there is 30% increase in searches for local keywords - Increases legitimacy of a Business We will help you get your website ranked well on google for the related keywords in your niche. We specialize in LOCAL SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION increasing visibility for small businesses by ranking them for geographically-related keywords. Say for eg-: you want to search a plumber in your city, You will be typing in keywords like Plumbers + City Or Plumbers + IN + City. We make sure your website comes in google MAP listings shown on page 1 for each such keyword. Now Google believes in - BE ORIGINAL, HAVE ORIGINAL AND GIVE ORIGINAL which means that google wants to end up that frustrating experience of users who are searching for Service Or Product and seeing the results that are not even close to what they are looking for. Google only wants to give their user original and relevant results. This makes it even more important that we showcase our business in the best possible way and make sure our website in valued high by google. We at TheLOCALIST will make google feel the importance of your business by following their guidelines thus ranking your website higher in serach results. We are presently offering LOCAL OPTIMIZATION to more than 400 websites and they all rank page 1 for all possible keywords !!! Each month your website is submitted to more than 50 citations and social presence is controlled by posting videos and blogs all over the web. Email us back with your website & phone number so we can discuss this further with you. Our Packages start from as low as 99$/month. Thanks For Taking Time To Read Our Email Polly Martin Local SEO Manager ( THE Localist ) Address : 24 ST Suite 32 Downtown Provo Utah ------------------- NOT INTERESTED ? REPLY WITH NOT INTERESTED IN THE SUBJECT LINE