From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 20 04:30:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17EF46B8 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 04:30:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from forward3m.mail.yandex.net (forward3m.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:2519::3:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Certum Level IV CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0B37649 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 04:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web13m.yandex.ru (web13m.yandex.ru [37.140.138.104]) by forward3m.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 33E276B610FD for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 08:29:43 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web13m.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 903471761145; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 08:29:41 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1413779381; bh=NY0+R9J98+4HdGUxFeCaD/6ozWhfJbxnQxyqsNRWa5w=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=eCb4kpr2tum3dTehSrZgX8EFoH+/ttQjKrLD3pWKOcvZeM1wVZhvCv4MlC2UTC/Dk 41pPHmG+08l7wbRP4v7aCTvce3Mh1YTLw+5E3/2Xexm4tLgFuTpi/N52F5NT5fOwPF oeHjYp9coBN5MLXX/TxTaFKTQczK08Y+xSHRQyLY= Received: from tsn46-166-168-243.dyn.nltelcom.net (tsn46-166-168-243.dyn.nltelcom.net [46.166.186.243]) by web13m.yandex.ru with HTTP; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 08:29:39 +0400 From: Martin Hanson To: "freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org" Subject: We need much better security updates for packages MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <821921413779379@web13m.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 06:29:39 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 04:30:03 -0000 Hi This is a suggestion. If "pkg" is going to be any good, meaning as a real replacement for always compiling from ports, I think it is really important that we move away from a fixed weekly build when important security upgrades are pending. We cannot wait week or more for the official repos when an important security upgrade is pending. Sure for some small packages it is no problem compiling them from ports, but that really beats the whole purpose of "pkg". Working also with Debian I believe we could perhaps "adopt" some of the ways they deal with these issues. I am not sure how it works at FreeBSD, but I suggest making some kind of security package build team that, when an important security upgrades arises, quickly upgrades the relevant packages. Or this could even be automatized perhaps? Kind regards. From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 20 13:53:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ED67AC7 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36AF5968 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s9KDr2ho036859 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:53:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193016] pkg upgrade does not use latest version from repo Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:53:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: kalten@gmx.at X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pkg@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:53:02 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D193016 --- Comment #3 from Kalten --- Created attachment 148502 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D148502&action= =3Dedit rm_old_multiple_pkgs.sh Some dirty hack for now: In the attached script =C2=BBrm_old_multiple_pkgs.sh=C2=AB: Read the comments there: Adjust =C2=BBpoudriere_pkgdir=C2=AB and run it. As it is now, it will only list the to be deleted files to stdout but not actually delete them. You would have to uncomment the call =C2=BBdeleteOldMultiplePkgVersions=C2=AB in =C2=BBmain()=C2=AB to automatic= ally delete them. I suggest you build the packages (e.g. using poudriere), than call this scr= ipt (having changed it to deleting mode), (may be build missing packages again = as the script might have deleted some it should not have) and thereafter build= the meta files by calling =C2=BBpkg repo ${poudriere_pkgdir}/All=C2=AB. I hope, it will be of use to some people. Kalten --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 20 16:42:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB14680 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ultra-secure.de (mail.ultra-secure.de [88.198.178.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED8838E1 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1978 invoked by uid 89); 20 Oct 2014 16:42:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.200?) (rainer@ultra-secure.de@217.71.83.52) by mail.ultra-secure.de with ESMTPA; 20 Oct 2014 16:42:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\)) Subject: Re: We need much better security updates for packages From: Rainer Duffner In-Reply-To: <821921413779379@web13m.yandex.ru> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 18:41:54 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <06AEEDD6-E7A7-4FAC-9FE5-54D329D42C07@ultra-secure.de> References: <821921413779379@web13m.yandex.ru> To: Martin Hanson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1) Cc: "freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:42:06 -0000 > Am 20.10.2014 um 06:29 schrieb Martin Hanson = : >=20 > Hi >=20 > This is a suggestion. >=20 > If "pkg" is going to be any good, meaning as a real replacement for > always compiling from ports, I think it is really important that we > move away from a fixed weekly build when important security upgrades > are pending. >=20 >=20 > Or this could even be automatized perhaps? >=20 I believe, the quarter-yearly =E2=80=9Ecuts=E2=80=9C of the ports-tree = are supposed to be that. I have no idea, however, how fast and plenty updates are coming to this = branch. I there a mailing-list only for commits to that particular branch? I don=E2=80=99t want mails with all commits to the whole ports-tree=E2=80=A6= . I run my own poudriere server and if I really need a security-update, I = copy the stuff over from my =E2=80=9Ecurrent=E2=80=9C tree that follows = head. Ideally, I would just need to run a svn update - but I=E2=80=99d like to = know in advance what has changed=E2=80=A6 From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 20 20:15:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97FF4B82 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:15:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6050D2D1 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:15:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s9KKF2L8033660 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:15:02 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s9KKF2Xc033659 for freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:15:02 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 25861 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2014 15:14:57 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.0.24?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.0.24) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 20 Oct 2014 15:14:57 -0500 Message-ID: <54456D40.7030902@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 15:14:56 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Hanson , "freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: We need much better security updates for packages References: <821921413779379@web13m.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <821921413779379@web13m.yandex.ru> OpenPGP: id=6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="P5WNTQavHlEVPsJkg5prOG2xisQfIfIXj" X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:15:02 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --P5WNTQavHlEVPsJkg5prOG2xisQfIfIXj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/19/2014 11:29 PM, Martin Hanson wrote: > Hi >=20 > This is a suggestion. >=20 > If "pkg" is going to be any good, meaning as a real replacement for > always compiling from ports, I think it is really important that we > move away from a fixed weekly build when important security upgrades > are pending. >=20 > We cannot wait week or more for the official repos when an important > security upgrade is pending. >=20 (I run the builds) We all agree. There's a lot of challenges to solve with changing how we build packages currently to speed them up. The easiest solution is more hardware. We are working to get more hardware to be able to build more often per week. We don't have anything official to announce yet. We currently build 1 time per week. We have some hardware freed up from not needing the pkg_install builds anymore, and not needing a new_xorg/ssp repository. We should be able to get to 2-3 times per week soon and 4-5 in February once we get additional hardware. We're also trying to balance new hardware with getting ARM/MIPS packages built. IMHO though we need near-daily builds for x86 ASAP. The recent security issues have been difficult. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --P5WNTQavHlEVPsJkg5prOG2xisQfIfIXj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJURW1AAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPb0cH/RPDj9lLb8eXvSIyv+1stucU ys7YLLvwZUV52LFaUgIhCjFEufG4uNzhYJ8PygtefecNUPghgLu+GxP+804KA1LI rR2pwBzH3181u0T5+BWpt4dgoOhVfxfMv14qF2ZKudYlnEGmuICkS9ujxpO/UgJ7 +rextjp9AoBiJ73gku9jBnOaUR3tD/AGeKZXRFn0vo9+yjlIxG81ImxPC3NU4wX8 dkY3q9U0gFL5jaqpb8MAG1nApbXEj2pOkf0j3qLarye+hGe+QLlFQlKRClwUKoPv rgWZufPDvttQZBNc74TOijBGKu6njoxTeVxvpQ17wRlHLSVHaqlDEmACqgYV9DQ= =26hh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --P5WNTQavHlEVPsJkg5prOG2xisQfIfIXj-- From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 22 10:49:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C20384DE for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eu1sys200aog105.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog105.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.119]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C66BDBC for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:49:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob105.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKVEeLldeOiYvkrjhk5DzsrLTmEQtJEHVd@postini.com; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:49:27 UTC Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id d1so960633wiv.14 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 03:48:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to; bh=4FJUNK5NCUxBbwXsQgwNU1GGJxU1DHEREk1S/U835PM=; b=ObhuL3FmY/ES6tnZEsZXpx7fv6KmcHDNckunEXvV3bhfGalb+N/dpx/PNLXfJ6Bq3s k3/QMeN/8VoSJpYWQT9Dw/b9pf0Lg/zQ7XLONtzKz1BXd9RpAcdFBEwivilnuiaTigfG RBP5nBhEx+1Gkrg9LVeKRONlqps/XbQ5aUYWXR5GpFTnpLVms3WDHJASa103TwmjDYSh 0jKBF2V/kCohEaBKV37DdPWkykKm47CefKbFhRaxd9kGYc9+HZ+oIC0RRiwIUzQS78W5 mmQ/brD4nXi5O7Q6wjMGunLOAJ06bChnFOw+I2tQ15UayVGlGjcQ7NX7w1UrPzILyCDu Dz5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlAjC3ahR2eyzxuD4ZBxWkg8maGDji2eVE0VCa0Gqp7WGBTfdHIUm48ntod39iQjDQZ7NkycalmjJzB+3engo9yzL2VOxrK6VVd9esPHGAO57xVS5vAbXQ9m/oM9tV8m4EE/cnN3AxhC2dr0SYNBU+LbG+ZKQ== X-Received: by 10.194.192.73 with SMTP id he9mr2326406wjc.125.1413974933673; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 03:48:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.192.73 with SMTP id he9mr2326399wjc.125.1413974933588; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 03:48:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.187.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ws2sm18433914wjc.32.2014.10.22.03.48.52 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Oct 2014 03:48:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s9MAmpBU010547 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:48:52 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s9MAmpGF010546 for freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:48:51 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:48:51 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201410221048.s9MAmpGF010546@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: pkg: grace has a missing dependency: pdflib Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:49:27 -0000 This is on a 10.0-RELEASE-p10 amd64 with pkg-1.3.8_3. All packages installed via pkg. I want to install fr-aster, and get this message: # pkg install fr-aster Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. pkg: grace has a missing dependency: pdflib The following 29 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED: fr-aster: 11.6.0.1_3 zsh: 5.0.7 .... Why does "grace has a missing dependency" in an official pkg repo? Should I worry? If I go ahead and install this package, then on "pkg check -srda" I get: # pkg check -srda Checking all packages: 27%math/grace has a missing dependency: print/pdflib math/grace has a missing dependency: math/fftw Checking all packages: 100% >>> Missing package dependencies were detected. >>> Found 2 issue(s) in the package database. pkg: No packages available to install matching 'print/pdflib' have been found in the repositories >>> Summary of actions performed: print/pdflib dependency failed to be fixed math/fftw dependency failed to be fixed >>> There are still missing dependencies. >>> You are advised to try fixing them manually. >>> Also make sure to check 'pkg updating' for known issues. Please advise Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 22 17:17:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03C9F56A for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.paymentallianceintl.com (mx2.paymentallianceintl.com [216.26.158.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx2.paymentallianceintl.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C25367FA for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from backup (162-230-214-65.lightspeed.lsvlky.sbcglobal.net [162.230.214.65]) by mx2.paymentallianceintl.com (8.14.5/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s9MHGwMP001976 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:16:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mikej@mikej.com) Received: from mail.mikej.com (firewall [192.168.6.63]) by backup (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s9MHGtZk068989 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:16:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mikej@mikej.com) X-Authentication-Warning: backup: Host firewall [192.168.6.63] claimed to be mail.mikej.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:16:55 -0400 From: Michael Jung To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Poudrire-devel / portsnap: Directory does not exist or is not writable Message-ID: X-Sender: mikej@mikej.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:17:08 -0000 Moving to a new server and in setting things up from scratch I found that poudriere-devel is reporting it can't update ports. root@backup:/usr/ports/ports-mgmt # poudriere ports -u [00:00:00] ====>> Updating portstree "default" portsnap: Directory does not exist or is not writable: /usr/local/poudriere/ports/default/.snap root@backup:/usr/ports/ports-mgmt # mkdir /usr/local/poudriere/ports/default/.snap corrects the issue. --mikej FreeBSD backup 10.1-RC1 FreeBSD 10.1-RC1 #1 r272488M: Sun Oct 5 13:51:29 EDT 2014 mikej@backup:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 root@backup:/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/poudriere-devel # poudriere version 3.1-pre root@backup:/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/poudriere-devel # root@backup:/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/poudriere-devel # poudriere jail -l JAILNAME VERSION ARCH METHOD TIMESTAMP PATH 10stablex64 10.1-PRERELEASE r273385 amd64 svn 2014-10-21 15:32:34 /usr/local/poudriere/jails/10stablex64 root@backup:/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/poudriere-devel # drwxr-xr-x 69 root wheel 81 Oct 22 06:14 /usr/local/poudriere/ports/default/ From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 23 10:30:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D63223E1; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:30:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91A07E4E; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.204.154.166] (helo=unixarea.DDR.dd) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XhFf6-0005GS-Ek; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:30:33 +0200 Received: from unixarea.DDR.dd (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by unixarea.DDR.dd (8.14.9/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s9NAUNXc002484; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:30:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by unixarea.DDR.dd (8.14.9/8.14.3/Submit) id s9NAUIeR002483; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:30:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: unixarea.DDR.dd: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:30:16 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Jimmy Kelley , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: building java/eclipse in HEAD w/ poudriere ... Message-ID: <20141023103016.GA2470@unixarea.DDR.dd> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , Jimmy Kelley , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org References: <20140824145851.GA1966@tiny-r269739> <20140907184231.GA1092@tiny-r269739> <20140909141026.GA1217@jmobile.jimmy.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20140909141026.GA1217@jmobile.jimmy.localnet> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r269739 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.154.166 X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:30:42 -0000 El día Tuesday, September 09, 2014 a las 09:10:26AM -0500, Jimmy Kelley escribió: > Hello Matthias, > > No ideas at the present on your problem. I tried building the eclipse port with > poudriere, but lang/gcc is failing for me on -CURRENT right now. > > I had never before built the eclipse port on a -CURRENT machine, so I set up a > -CURRENT i386 VM in VirtualBox with 2Gb RAM, 30 GB disk space, > did a "pkg install" of eclipse 4.3.2_1 that currently is available (to get all > the build/run dependencies installed), and then did a "make package" of the > eclipse 4.3.2_2 in the ports tree. One hour later, I had a eclipse package > ready to install, no out of memory errors or any other problem. > > From posts on the Eclipse Wiki's, building Eclipse with only 2Gb of RAM seems to > running pretty close to the lower limit needed. I have managed to build with > -Xmx1536m, but that's a low as I dare go; suggestions on the Eclipse Wiki for > building Eclipse 4.4 recommend setting -Xmx2560m. > > I don't know anything about poudriere really, having never used it until my > attempt last week. Could the overhead of poudriere be taking away from the > memory space that would normally be available if one wasn't using it? Hello, Was meanwhile someone able to build java/eclipse on head in i386 *with* poudriere? Thx matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaign From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 25 20:00:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BEC399B for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 20:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x22f.google.com (mail-pd0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64692178 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 20:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f175.google.com with SMTP id y13so3283123pdi.20 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 13:00:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date :to:mime-version; bh=rIcO/fbKxhqIONp2p3QFLHKTPBLuVtQWYrXvUgtnwIs=; b=t9T4xFgMXq7t69TPkWJb0KwlwTZphkpyreZRQGG84m05iVUSVdMrat/UH45Z+WiV9C TfYDtv7qDlueTN3s7MuEBmCmfTmBC5aLughALSPLLoz1d4TPxUGrhCOpgO5kKKe3U7uw eU1omVNU5eCNs75duYEyaG1FQGf7BNms1kZRAxghQP2+2zIQg2O5i57eCgRB+HWrsYKi 7OQPBhUlNLxlEZMDgqkPzxchPI6n/vny4QeQaxyh2cswd6RYKuuRZGxs3ihSZWbEgHND m38k6vHk9Z2NhKIudmH5TB6vlZujWyV4Af9bk8ffPzSoRMv8ajEuDTpzhzQN0DmXLdMb L+zg== X-Received: by 10.66.255.36 with SMTP id an4mr13414589pad.15.1414267204945; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 13:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (c-50-132-9-251.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [50.132.9.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ll4sm6919858pab.25.2014.10.25.13.00.04 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 25 Oct 2014 13:00:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul Beard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: send-pr Message-Id: Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 13:00:02 -0700 To: pkg@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 20:00:05 -0000 I would use send-pr for this but it doesn=E2=80=99t work because postfix = doesn=E2=80=99t work because it doesn=E2=80=99t link against the right = db libraries for the files on disk. I have tried re-hashing/re-mapping = and it doesn=E2=80=99t seem to take. And I can=E2=80=99t install from = source because of this.=20 pkg-static: = lstat(/usr/ports/mail/postfix/work/stage%%RESETPREFIX%%/share/doc/postfix/= ): No such file or directory Kind of underwhelmed with pkgng when this kind of thing happens. I have = another send-pr stuck in queue which is how I found this.=20 If I wanted an uncooperative package management system, I could have = stayed with Linux=E2=80=A6= From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 25 20:52:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5BDEB04 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 20:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com (mail-pa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E3A8976 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 20:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id kx10so3065087pab.40 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 13:52:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date :to:mime-version; bh=SazMJPepMDn/p67wYRHhql4bdoa49e8AdKzLL2YrybU=; b=0gGbK06M1AXGEpVE3JDHZx5DfHFC8oTvmCgiYGbtFqqGV9LIEdq5NKxEuM0Sx0c6yA zOuh9Y1VLyGkEU9wL8DIxbM37VJ7lEZQ6wYqh69/OiwcxZ+noJXgOmsk4moynccnTZjO QRwli9ic4+60ouEofl1/VVMqcXiCHEHmg84dYTjtTi81KXNOpKXaKLcQy8C5ILOiaMYk ZRKXdTgvkBGUHifPmR4EN39GjKAgQ0TeNi1tp4uR5cVyjNUPDkfXxFvK0XEfbaLSJFbI Gv4SN2XB6dj2i6IXbvunB9M5VBKiDDaYKLCKcGONtDz/y2Df69tXQ+m+rCmRWqQYXVjN m1Yg== X-Received: by 10.68.135.65 with SMTP id pq1mr13208790pbb.18.1414270352173; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 13:52:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:470:b:839:a400:6c43:bd98:5821? ([2001:470:b:839:a400:6c43:bd98:5821]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ez4sm6893232pab.36.2014.10.25.13.52.31 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 25 Oct 2014 13:52:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul Beard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: more pkg woes Message-Id: Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 13:52:29 -0700 To: pkg@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 20:52:32 -0000 It doesn=E2=80=99t do much good to select options that aren=E2=80=99t = there.=20 Oct 25 13:50:24 www postfix/smtp[84641]: warning: smtp_sasl_auth_enable = is true, but SASL support is not compiled in Oct 25 13:50:24 www postfix/smtp[84641]: warning: TLS has been selected, = but TLS support is not compiled in Not sure how many hours I still have to go before I fix this but it was = a damn site easier before pkgng.=20=