Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:11:27 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Subject: Need input on preference on location of 3rd party tests vs FreeBSD tests Message-ID: <E5C29F6D-C632-4B7B-B8C8-0816C93DB7B7@gmail.com> References: <B1CE2158-B8C1-4D97-AB7A-031ADF55C435@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi all, One of the things that I've done on my fork of FreeBSD is I've imported A= TF test suites from NetBSD and I have integrated existing test suites from f= reebsd's tools/regression tree into Kyua as well. Due to the size and differ= ence in test content/coverage, I pulled lib/libc and lib/msun from bother so= urces and integrated them into Kyua. What I did was I put the netbsd testcas= es into the tests/ subdirectory and put the FreeBSD test suites into a tests= /legacy subdirectory. The goal was that the legacy directory would eventuall= y be converted over to atf testcases and then could be removed once the conv= ersion was complete. I'm not sure if this scheme makes sense though. Does anyone have a prefer= ence as to whether or not this makes sense? Thanks! -Garrett=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E5C29F6D-C632-4B7B-B8C8-0816C93DB7B7>