Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 17:20:47 -0700 From: Neel Natu <neelnatu@gmail.com> To: Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Neel Natu <neel@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD Message-ID: <CAFgRE9FXxPPfQyA2Eu09zexf4b0xCch5h07c4iWFbR9qq9DooA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CACpH0MdjL-sCS4%2BJbNYvN=nq7y5yF%2BUeByN=YLxfiWN%2BGX4E-Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <154A442D-7814-4618-9AFC-6F9FB3F5DFD3@gmail.com> <5443A89F.8050801@digiware.nl> <B44FDB33-D8AB-4E58-9E9E-5EF8B6452334@gmail.com> <CACpH0MdjL-sCS4%2BJbNYvN=nq7y5yF%2BUeByN=YLxfiWN%2BGX4E-Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com> wrot= e: > I tried to integrate this patch into 10.1_RC3 and I failed. Is there a > timeframe to MFC this to 10.1 or 10-STABLE? > It will be MFCed to 10-STABLE but I don't have a specific time frame in min= d. I'll guess that it'll be towards the end of November but can be accelerated if someone has a need for this in 10-STABLE sooner. best Neel > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Benjamin Perrault <ben.perrault@gmail.co= m> > wrote: >> >> After a few days of extensive testing and abuse, i=E2=80=99ve run into n= o new >> issues or unknowns what so ever. Everything that worked before still wor= ks >> now ( and a few bugs from fixed from HEAD ). >> >> Thus, I have gone ahead and pushed r273182 w/ Neel=E2=80=99s patch out t= o about 80 >> of the assorted AMD boxes in the production and dev pods that I care for= . If >> end users see something, I=E2=80=99ll let you know, but I have a feeling= they won=E2=80=99t. >> >> Again - Excellent work. >> >> cheers, >> -bp >> >> > On Oct 19, 2014, at 5:03 AM, Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl> >> > wrote: >> > >> > On 16-10-2014 5:00, Anish Gupta wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> The projects/bhyve_svm branch is ready to be merged to HEAD. >> >> >> >> This branch contains patches to bhyve to enable it to work on AMD >> >> processors with SVM/AMD-V hardware extensions[1]. Pretty much any AMD >> >> processor since 2010 will have the features required by bhyve. >> >> >> >> bhyve on AMD supports (almost) all the features available with Intel >> >> [2]. All guest OSes supported on Intel are supported on AMD. All the >> >> bhyve-related utilities function similarly on both Intel and AMD >> >> platforms [3]. >> >> >> >> The patch against HEAD revision 273066 is available for review and >> >> testing: >> >> https://people.freebsd.org/~neel/bhyve/bhyve_svm.diff [Neel=E2=80=99s= web >> >> directory] >> >> >> >> [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86_virtualization >> >> [2]: bhyve doesn't support PCI passthru on AMD at this time >> >> [3]: bhyvectl has grown some processor-specific options >> > >> > Fetched the patch and compiled. >> > Now running: HEAD r273066M and I was able to throw at it all the tests >> > and images that in the past works. And perhaps even better. >> > >> > Great work. >> > --WjW >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> > "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFgRE9FXxPPfQyA2Eu09zexf4b0xCch5h07c4iWFbR9qq9DooA>